My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2001-02-06 P & Z
Centerville
>
Planning & Zoning
>
Minutes
>
2000-2022
>
2001
>
2001-02-06 P & Z
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/9/2006 3:01:04 PM
Creation date
1/18/2006 1:50:09 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Business Signs – Home-based businesses may have a sign that is no larger than four (4) <br />square feet. The sign may not be an interior-illuminated sign. <br /> <br />Motion by Commissioner DeVine, seconded by Commissioner Sheppard to amend <br />Ordinance #39 as specified. All in favor. Motion carried unanimously. <br /> <br /> <br />3.Site Plan Review Checklist <br /> <br />Mr. March reviewed the submitted draft checklist that will ensure that all requirements <br />are met during site plan review. Mr. March requested comments on same prior to the <br />next meeting. <br /> <br />Commissioner Brainard questioned whether Staff would be using the form to verify all <br />information has been reviewed and reporting same to the Commission prior to <br />consideration of the project. Mr. March indicated Staff would be using the form to <br />prepare a report to the Commission for their review process. <br /> <br />Commissioner Brainard requested a report on each plan from Building Official, Mr. Paul <br />Palzer, as well as, Mr. March on the checklist items highlighting any special concerns. <br /> <br />VI. DISCUSSION ITEMS <br /> <br />Commissioner DeVine questioned whether Mr. March had recommendations for mini- <br />storage facilities. Mr. March felt that the tax base consideration was very important. <br /> <br />Commissioner DeVine stated that developing mini-storage requirements would assist the <br />Commission in advising those interested in building mini-storage facilities. <br /> <br />Chairperson Hanson suggested that a work session be held prior to the next meeting to <br />develop requirements for mini-storage facilities. <br /> <br />Commissioner Sheppard stated if the City required them to follow the Industrial criteria, <br />everything is already set up. <br /> <br />Chairperson Hanson explained that there are many things that need to be determined <br />other than just the appearance of the building. <br /> <br />Commissioner DeVine questioned the possibility of discussing requirements at the next <br />regular meeting prior to audience participation. <br /> <br />Chairperson Hanson stated he preferred to discuss this item at a work session. Mr. March <br />noted the work session is public meeting. Mr. Sadelack and Mr. Sager may be in <br />attendance. Chairperson Hanson said they may not be there because it is a work session <br />and not a formal meeting. <br /> <br />Chairperson Hanson questioned the procedures for dealing with two (2) builders coming <br />before the Commission requesting to develop the same property with the same type of <br />facility. Mr. March stated that he did not foresee two (2) individuals building mini- <br />Page 8 of 10 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.