Laserfiche WebLink
maintained. Mr. March noted there is an issue with a trail coming from Chauncy Barrot <br />Gardens connecting to the subdivision between units 2 and 3. Mr. March noted there is <br />also an issue with unit 3’s building pad encroaching into the easement. <br /> <br />Mr. Rawlings noted the trail would connect to a private road. He then asked if the City <br />has authorization to revert the road to a public road. <br /> <br />Ms. Jean Davis, 1764 Ojibway Drive, stated she did not know when she bought her home <br />that the road was private. She then explained that since the street is not on the map of <br />Centerville it took the post office three weeks to find her. Whenever she receives <br />deliveries they are delayed because they aren’t able to find her. <br /> <br />Mr. Larry Boerner, 7014 Dupre Road, questioned why they are stuck with private roads. <br />Mr. Quigley explained that private roads are quite common in townhome developments. <br />He then noted the private road information was on the plat from the beginning, and on the <br />plat in the sales office. <br /> <br />Mrs. Peterson, 7065 Dupre Road, noted the original plat showed Ojibway Drive going <br />through and exiting on Meadow Lane, not as a cul-de-sac. Mr. Quigley explained that it <br />was requested at a previous meeting that Ojibway end in a cul-de-sac. Mrs. Peterson <br />stated she did not want a cul-de-sac. <br /> <br />Mr. Brian Carlson, 1771 Meadow Lane, questioned the type of trees to be planted as a <br />screen from Parkview. He then noted the building with units 7 and 8 would be very close <br />to his backyard and asked that the building be moved forward ten (10) or more feet to <br />provide more privacy. <br /> <br />Commissioner McLean noted the City Engineer had recommended the building be <br />moved ten (10) or twenty (20) feet forward to provide more privacy to the home on <br />Meadow Lane. <br /> <br />Chairperson Hanson read the rest of the recommendations of the City Engineer <br />nd <br />concerning the preliminary plat for Eagle Pass 2 Addition. Mr. Quigley stated he would <br />look at all the issues raised and noted the screening was done as a request during the <br />sketch plan phase. <br /> <br />Mr. Jim Juhl, 1825 Voyager Court, questioned if the density for the new development is <br />the same as his Association. He noted that Lot 6, Block 2 is really close to the last unit <br />on his street. Mr. Quigley stated he thought the density is less than the original <br />development and noted there are fewer units than originally planned. <br /> <br />Mr. March requested the developer’s response to the easement between Lots 2 and 3, <br />Block 1. Mr. Quigley stated he felt it was appropriate to plat over an easement line. Mr. <br />March explained the edge of the house would be built adjacent to the easement, which is <br />not a desirable situation. <br /> <br />Page 3 of 12 <br /> <br />