Laserfiche WebLink
Council Liaison Broussard Vickers then summarized the issues raised concerning the <br />preliminary plat. Those issues are: The driveway crossing property of the current <br />Townhome Association and concern for more detail for the buffering that will take place <br />in the development. She then explained that the City has not gotten into a position of <br />requiring exact details regarding the construction of the buildings as was suggested by a <br />resident. <br /> <br />Mrs. Albrecht stated they have no idea what the buildings will look like and said she is <br />concerned that she will have to pay to maintain and repair Ojibway Drive after the <br />construction truck traffic and the addition of twenty (20) more homes. She then noted <br />she did not think it was fair to her Association, as construction trucks tear up roads. <br /> <br />Council Liaison Broussard Vickers questioned whether the residents were interested in <br />expanding their Association to include the new townhomes, if the City does not make the <br />street public. <br /> <br />Ms. Peterson explained the by-laws of the Association specify 18 units. Council Liaison <br />Broussard Vickers explained that the bylaws could be amended if the Association chose <br />to do so. She then asked if the residents were fine with the basic design for the <br />townhomes. <br /> <br />Mr. Albrecht questioned if there was an alternative plan that the developer could come up <br />with. Mr. Quigley stated he was at the meeting to seek input and take it back for <br />consideration. <br /> <br />Council Liaison Broussard Vickers stated she would like to review the Association by- <br />laws. She then noted the plan was in the preliminary stages and agreed that the City <br />needed to review the road issue. <br /> <br />Mr. Norm Freeberg, 7025 Dupre Road, asked if the new development would have silt <br />barriers included. He noted that the developer dumped ten (10) loads of dirt right next to <br />his townhome. He feels about one load a week goes into the sewer which runs into the <br />lake. He feels this should not be allowed. He noted there is mud running everywhere <br />and asked how the developer is allowed to get by without providing silt fencing. He <br />understands that the trucks have to get in and out of the area, but those trucks are <br />dragging the dirt and mud into the streets. He thinks they or the developer should have to <br />clean up the mess, not the City. <br /> <br />Council Member Broussard Vickers explained that silt fencing was not a part of <br />Developer’s Agreements at that time, but is required in all new Developer’s Agreements. <br /> <br />Mr. Quigley explained that all the silt fence requirements were met during the time of <br />construction. He then noted Centerville does not require silt fencing around the building <br />site. Mr. March explained the City requires, in new subdivisions, barrier around the curb <br />and river rock where the driveway would be. He then noted it is a constant problem <br />trying to get developers to clean up after their subcontractors. <br />Page 5 of 12 <br /> <br />