My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2001-09-04 P & Z
Centerville
>
Planning & Zoning
>
Minutes
>
2000-2022
>
2001
>
2001-09-04 P & Z
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/9/2006 3:01:00 PM
Creation date
1/18/2006 1:56:25 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Chairperson Hanson indicated he had tried to fit Mr. and Mrs. Bates situation into the <br />criteria but does not feel the criteria have been met. <br /> <br />Council Liaison Broussard Vickers reviewed the variance requirements for the applicant. <br /> <br />Chairperson Hanson recommended attaching the garage to the house and meeting the 10- <br />foot setback. <br /> <br />Commissioner Wilharber stated that, in his opinion, the criteria could be met because the <br />area was developed as a PUD which is unique in its own respect. He then said the homes <br />were placed on the property with no allowance made for garages, and other variances <br />were granted in the area so he feels not granting the variance to Mr. and Mrs. Bates <br />would deprive them of something others have. He further stated that an improvement to <br />the property would have the advantages of improved appearance of the property and tax <br />benefits for the City. <br /> <br />Council Liaison Broussard Vickers cautioned that if Commissioner Wilharber’s logic <br />were applied to some of the larger lots in the City some very large structures could be <br />built. She then questioned if this variance were granted whether the City would need to <br />grant them for everyone else who asked. <br /> <br />Commissioner DeVine questioned whether there was any other R4 zoning in the City. <br /> <br />Mr. Bates indicated that, even if he were allowed to build the 20 x 20 garage, he would <br />still need another building for storage. Council Liaison Broussard Vickers indicated that <br />he would not be allowed another accessory structure. <br /> <br />Mrs. Bates indicated she had called the City to ask if they would be able to build a garage <br />before purchasing the house. She then indicated they would not have purchased the <br />house if they had gotten accurate information from the City concerning the issues <br />involved in building a garage on that lot. She further stated that she feels City Staff is the <br />residents’ link to information and regulations within the City and she feels a person <br />should be able to rely upon the information received. <br /> <br />Commissioner Wilharber indicated that, unless you build the City exactly the way you <br />want it to begin with, variances are necessary. He also said not everything can be black <br />and white there needs to be some gray. <br /> <br />Motion by Commissioner Brainerd to recommend Council deny the variance <br />request for an oversized accessory structure at 1977 South Robin Lane. <br /> <br />The Motion died for lack of a second. <br /> <br /> <br />Motion by Commissioner Wilharber, seconded by Commissioner McLean to <br />recommend Council approve the variance request for an oversized accessory <br />Page 13 of 16 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.