Laserfiche WebLink
Ms. Dell indicated the road was moved in 1978 or 1979 at the same time sewer was put <br />in. <br /> <br />Mr. Rehbein inquired as to whether the City had an Ordinance that required the City <br />Engineer to do the construction drawings. Mr. Palzer indicated he thought the City does <br />require that the City Engineer provide all utility drawings. Mr. Rehbein then asked the <br />Commission to consider allowing him to use his staff to do the work as they can do it a <br />lot less expensively. He further indicated the City Engineer could still review the <br />drawings and do the inspections. Mr. Palzer indicated he would check into it. <br /> <br />Motion by Commissioner Wilharber, seconded by Commissioner McLean to <br />recommend that Council approve the Preliminary Plat for The Shores. All in favor. <br />Motion carried unanimously. <br /> <br />Commissioner Wilharber recommended Mr. Rehbein check with Ms. Bender to make <br />sure that the matter is posted in time for the public hearing at the Council level. <br /> <br />2. Mr. and Mrs. Jeremy Bates – 1977 South Robin Lane <br /> <br />Mrs. Bates reviewed her situation for the Commission and indicated the variance request <br />was denied by Council because Council would like to have the Commission change the <br />Ordinance. She then indicated that the current maximum accessory structure is 200 <br />square feet and they had requested a 400 square foot garage. <br /> <br />Mrs. Bates indicated that of the 39 houses in Royal Meadows 20 houses have two car <br />detached garages and only six (6) houses have no garage. <br /> <br />Chairperson Hanson explained that the Ordinance would not be changed at this meeting <br />but said a recommendation will be made and the matter will be published for a public <br />hearing. <br /> <br />Council Liaison Broussard Vickers indicated that at the Council meeting the City <br />Attorney had indicated he would prefer that the City not govern by variance because the <br />City would have to look at granting any variances of the same type. She then explained <br />that this request was double the allowed size and, while Council was sympathetic to the <br />Bates’ situation, it preferred to change the Ordinance rather than granting the variance. <br />She also noted that Mayor Swedberg had asked that Planning and Zoning hurry the <br />matter along even if that meant scheduling an extra work session meeting. <br /> <br />Commissioner Wilharber stated that, if 20 of the 39 homes have two car garages, the City <br />must have granted variances in the past. He then indicated that he feels that one more <br />variance would not have been detrimental to the City. He further indicated that he did <br />not feel that it made sense for Council to deny the variance in this instance. <br />Page 3 of 15 <br /> <br />