Laserfiche WebLink
Boarding Kennel <br /> <br />Chairperson Hanson indicated that the Committee would be discussing wording for the <br />Ordinance at the work session. He then indicated that the applicant did not need to attend <br />the meeting because it is a simple addition to the industrial section of the Ordinance to <br />allow for boarding kennels. He then indicated that there would be a public hearing at the <br />next meeting for any residents to express concerns. <br /> <br />Council Liaison Broussard Vickers indicated that the Ordinance would be changed and <br />published for a public hearing and, if at that meeting it is determined that changes need to <br />be made, it would again be published and would go to Council for a public hearing. <br /> <br />Chairperson Hanson indicated that the matter would most likely be before Council on the <br />second Wednesday in November. He did note, however, if Council determines it would <br />like any changes to the Ordinance it would be sent back and have to be republished <br />causing a delay in approval and the effective date. <br /> <br />Commissioner DeVine asked if the Committee would carry over the O’Connor letter and <br />the Carlson letter. <br /> <br />Mr. Rehbein indicated he would like the Committee to discuss the O’Connor letter as he <br />is the neighbor it refers to. <br /> <br />Council Liaison Broussard Vickers indicated the letter had suggested that the Committee <br />made a mistake with the changes to Ordinance #4 concerning parking allowances for <br />motor homes and boats and asked the Committee to reconsider it. <br /> <br />Chairperson Hanson indicated the Committee had not made a mistake and clarified that it <br />was the intent of the Committee to allow two or less motor homes or boats to be parked <br />in a resident’s driveway indefinitely provided the motor home is less than 35 feet long. <br /> <br />Council Liaison Broussard Vickers indicated that, if it is the intent of the Committee to <br />allow indeterminate parking, Mr. O’Connor would like the Committee to reconsider as he <br />does not want the City to allow parking in the driveway. <br /> <br />Council Liaison Broussard Vickers clarified that not more than two things are allowed to <br />park in the driveway permanently. She further clarified there is nothing wrong with the <br />wording but the resident disagrees with it. <br /> <br />Mr. Rehbein clarified that the 48 hour time limit refers to vehicles parked by visitors. <br /> <br />It was the consent of the Committee not to consider changing Ordinance #4 as requested <br />by Mr. O’Connor. <br /> <br />It was the consent of the Committee to hold the Carlson letter for discussion at the work <br />session. <br />Page 8 of 15 <br /> <br />