Laserfiche WebLink
Ms. Moore-Sykes indicated that the Ordinance went into effect on May 1, 2001 and the <br />permit was pulled on May 2, 2001. <br /> <br />Mr. Drilling indicated he had no problem providing a comprehensive sign plan and then <br />asked if a tenant, such as Hair Update, wanted to differ from the comprehensive sign plan <br />would they be required to ask for a variance. <br /> <br />Council Liaison Broussard Vickers indicated a variance would not be necessary provided <br />that the sign meets all the requirements of the sign code. <br /> <br />Commissioner DeVine asked how much square footage of signage was being used. Mr. <br />Drilling indicated that he was using a small portion of what the sign ordinance allows. <br /> <br />Council Liaison Broussard Vickers reminded Mr. Drilling to make sure he does not allow <br />one tenant a disproportionate amount of signage and end up with not enough for the last <br />tenant. <br /> <br />It was determined that Mr. Drilling did not need to submit a comprehensive sign plan due <br />to the fact that the ordinance indicates that the comprehensive sign plan is part of the site <br />review process and Mr. Drilling had completed the site review process prior to the May <br />1, 2001 effective date of the Ordinance change. <br /> <br />Mr. Drilling asked if he needed a sign permit. <br /> <br />Council Liaison Broussard Vickers recommended that Mr. Drilling check with Mr. Palzer <br />to determine whether or not he needed a sign permit. <br /> <br />Commissioner DeVine asked City Administrator Moore-Sykes to create a binder with the <br />latest Ordinances because the Commission should have the Ordinance in front of it when <br />discussing possible changes. He then commented that the letter he received from Ms. <br />Bender contained incorrect information and said that anyone at City Hall quoting <br />Ordinances should know what they are talking about. <br /> <br />Council Liaison Broussard Vickers suggested that only Mr. Palzer and Ms. Moore-Sykes <br />should be quoting Ordinances. <br /> <br /> 3. Mr. Brent Coatney – Mueller Pipeliners (Terminal Transport Building); Site Plan <br /> <br />Mr. Brent Coatney, the President of Terminal Transport indicated that he is downsizing <br />his business due to economic constraints and would like to sublease his facility in <br />Centerville to Mueller Pipeliners. He then indicated that Mueller Pipeliners is a similar <br />type of industry and should be a good business for Centerville. <br /> <br />Jeff Nordness of 25582 East Comfort Drive, Chisago City, representing Mueller <br />Pipeliners presented a grading plan and described for the Commission what Mueller <br />Pipeliners wished to do. He then indicated that the one change in the plan is that Mueller <br />Page 12 of 24 <br /> <br />