Laserfiche WebLink
� � <br /> March 6, 2001 <br /> Planning and Zoning Minutes <br /> hire someone, but anticipated this to be a low maintenance business. Mr. Sadelack stated <br /> that in his opinion, he is not selling something and does not feel the need to have an on <br /> site manager. Mr. Sadelack stated he was unaware of another mini-storage facility other <br /> than those with on-site caretakers and franchised mini-storage facilities that have an on- <br /> site manager during business hours. He then noted he did not see the necessity for same. <br /> Council Liaison Broussard Vickers questioned the type of construction requirements the <br /> Commissiori would place on mini-storage facilities. Consensus was that the construction <br /> would conform to the Industrial requirements for the business park. Council Liaison <br /> Broussard Vickers stated that the City can not modify the requirements for individual <br /> businesses. Council Liaison Broussard Vickers also stated the City recently modified the <br /> requirements for buildings in the Industrial Park when re-writing Ordinance #4 and took <br /> into consideration that it would increase the cost of construction, but the City desired to <br /> require a specific type of structure. <br /> Council Member Broussard Vickers questioned whether the City could require an on-site <br /> manager. Commissioner Kilian did not believe there was a necessity to provide same. <br /> Commissioner Brainard stated that there has been problems with vandalism and <br /> maintenance at other facilities and an on-site manage would deter vandalism and ensure <br /> that the facility is maintained accordingly. ; <br /> Commissioner DeVine questioned the type of fencing proposed by developer. Mr. �', <br /> Sadelack stated that fencing is undetermined and understands the aesthetic concerns I <br /> expressed by the Commission. '� <br /> Mr. Sadelack stated that the requirem�nts the Commission outlined are ultimatel �� <br /> Y <br /> advantageous to him as it will force him to provide a better facility and people will use <br /> the facility due to the enhanced safety features. Mr. Sadelack aiso stated that while the <br /> requirements may be advantageous they are also a hindrance due to additional costs not <br /> taken into consideration. Mr. Sadelack also stated that he was not planning on installing <br /> a sprinkler system or concrete construction requirements that the Commission is <br /> requiring. <br /> Commissioner DeVine stated that the valuation of the building must conforzn to the <br /> average valuation per square foot of the surrounding buildings in the Industrial Park. <br /> Council Liaison Broussard Vickers stated that if the Commission adheres to the <br /> construction standard, there would be consistency. Council Liaison Broussard Vickers <br /> also stated that Mr. Sadelack would need to meet the industrial building standards due to <br /> the fact that he does not meet the standards for obtaining a Variance; and cost is not a <br /> reason for granting a Variance. Council Member Broussard Vickers suggested that the <br /> architect sketch plans that take into account cunent ordinances and Mr. Sadelack could <br /> determine cost effectiveness. <br /> Commissioner McLean questioned whether the architect had reviewed the industrial <br /> building code requirements. Mr. Sadelack stated that he was unsure of same. Mr. March <br /> stated that Mr. Sadelack had been presented with an entire copy of Ordinance #4. <br /> Page 3 of 8 <br />