My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2001-07-10 Agenda Packet
Centerville
>
Committees
>
Parks & Rec.
>
Agenda Packets
>
1997-2022
>
2001
>
2001-07-10 Agenda Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/27/2010 11:13:29 AM
Creation date
4/27/2010 11:13:15 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
107
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
� May 23, 2001 <br /> Council Meeting Minutes <br /> Mr. Hannah stated that, as designed, it does not look like it would be difficult to take out <br /> the street but stated he questioned whether it is practical to change the street this far into <br /> the process. <br /> Mr. Hoeft indicated there would be no problem with proposing that the area remain a cul- <br /> de-sac when the final plat is presented. <br /> Council Member Capra recommended that Mr. Hannah check with the police and fire <br /> deparhnents to determine whether they would have an issue with the street remaining a <br /> cul-de-sac. <br /> Mr. March stated that as there is no turn around on Pheasant Lane, the cul-de-sac would <br /> need to be modified. <br /> Mr. Brian Walters, 1855 Quebec, stated the Parks and Recreation Committee are unsure <br /> of the location developer intended on placing the traiL <br /> Mr. Hannah stated that the two (2) requirements presented to him were that the trail <br /> connects to the Hunter's Crossing trail and continue to the northeast corner and run <br /> through the upland area. <br /> Motion bv Council Member Broussard Vickers, second by Council Member Travis <br /> to set a public hearin on the presented feasibilit stu ��for 3une 13, 2001. All in <br /> favor.. Motion carried unanimouslv. <br /> Council Member Broussard Vickers questioned the easement acquisition costs and <br /> assessment amounts were determined. Mr. Peterson indicated they were estimated <br /> amounts. <br /> Council Member Broussard Vickers stated that there would be a resident who was <br /> unhappy with the assessments and easement request as he was under the impression that <br /> the property would not be developed. <br /> Mr. Peterson explained that whenever sewer and water are extended, the assessment <br /> amount is based on the number of feet of frontage. <br /> Council Member Broussard Vickers questioned the relationship of these assessments for <br /> this improvement project and how they are related to the project to the north. Council <br /> Member Broussard Vickers stated that most of the cost was bore by the developer. <br /> Council Member Broussard Vickers also stated that the assessments for residents seemed <br /> high in this case. Mr. Peterson stated that Ground Development would pay for 93% of <br /> the overall costs to run the services. <br /> Council Member Broussard Vickers questioned what percentage, in relation to where <br /> there are residents, the developer is paying. Mr. Peterson indicated the developer is <br /> paying 50% of the costs where there are residents. He then explained that the difference <br /> could be because there were not clear-cut frontages for the assessments to the north. <br /> Page 8 of 12 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.