Laserfiche WebLink
� May 23, 2001 <br /> Council Meeting Minutes <br /> Mr. Hannah stated that, as designed, it does not look like it would be difficult to take out <br /> the street but stated he questioned whether it is practical to change the street this far into <br /> the process. <br /> Mr. Hoeft indicated there would be no problem with proposing that the area remain a cul- <br /> de-sac when the final plat is presented. <br /> Council Member Capra recommended that Mr. Hannah check with the police and fire <br /> deparhnents to determine whether they would have an issue with the street remaining a <br /> cul-de-sac. <br /> Mr. March stated that as there is no turn around on Pheasant Lane, the cul-de-sac would <br /> need to be modified. <br /> Mr. Brian Walters, 1855 Quebec, stated the Parks and Recreation Committee are unsure <br /> of the location developer intended on placing the traiL <br /> Mr. Hannah stated that the two (2) requirements presented to him were that the trail <br /> connects to the Hunter's Crossing trail and continue to the northeast corner and run <br /> through the upland area. <br /> Motion bv Council Member Broussard Vickers, second by Council Member Travis <br /> to set a public hearin on the presented feasibilit stu ��for 3une 13, 2001. All in <br /> favor.. Motion carried unanimouslv. <br /> Council Member Broussard Vickers questioned the easement acquisition costs and <br /> assessment amounts were determined. Mr. Peterson indicated they were estimated <br /> amounts. <br /> Council Member Broussard Vickers stated that there would be a resident who was <br /> unhappy with the assessments and easement request as he was under the impression that <br /> the property would not be developed. <br /> Mr. Peterson explained that whenever sewer and water are extended, the assessment <br /> amount is based on the number of feet of frontage. <br /> Council Member Broussard Vickers questioned the relationship of these assessments for <br /> this improvement project and how they are related to the project to the north. Council <br /> Member Broussard Vickers stated that most of the cost was bore by the developer. <br /> Council Member Broussard Vickers also stated that the assessments for residents seemed <br /> high in this case. Mr. Peterson stated that Ground Development would pay for 93% of <br /> the overall costs to run the services. <br /> Council Member Broussard Vickers questioned what percentage, in relation to where <br /> there are residents, the developer is paying. Mr. Peterson indicated the developer is <br /> paying 50% of the costs where there are residents. He then explained that the difference <br /> could be because there were not clear-cut frontages for the assessments to the north. <br /> Page 8 of 12 <br />