My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2001-07-10 Agenda Packet
Centerville
>
Committees
>
Parks & Rec.
>
Agenda Packets
>
1997-2022
>
2001
>
2001-07-10 Agenda Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/27/2010 11:13:29 AM
Creation date
4/27/2010 11:13:15 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
107
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City Council Meeting Minutes <br /> June13,2001 <br /> construction and the manhole cover is underwater. Mayor Swedberg stated that Mr. <br /> Vanderbeek had indicated a concern for drainage behind his property. <br /> Mr. Wilharber indicated there were some properties along Centerville Road that were <br /> unable to be assessed due to side-yard frontage, which increased the costs for others. <br /> Mr. Wilharber indicated that the developer cannot put more water on your properiy than <br /> is already there. He then indicated that there were ponds behind his property and that he <br /> was concerned that the ponds would become larger. Mr. Hannah has indicated no <br /> additional water would be put on his property. <br /> Mr. Wilharber indicated that the ditch behind Mr. Vanderbeek's house is not a County <br /> ditch but was created by farmers who worked together to create a series of ditches to <br /> drain their properties out to Centerville Lake. He then indicated that the only County <br /> ditch in the area is Ditch #47. <br /> Mr. Wilharber indicated that the ditch Mr. Vanderbeek has an issue with also drains his j <br /> property on the west. He then noted he had talked to Mr. Hannah about his concern for <br /> drainage. <br /> Mr. Wilharber indicated he received sticker shock when he received the first estimated ' <br /> assessment amount. Mr. Wilharber stated that a portion of his property is not in MUSA <br /> until 2006 and the remaining portion in 2011. He further noted it is pretty tough to , <br /> swallow the assessment amount, as the property will not be in MUSA for quite some <br /> time. <br /> Mr. March indicated that the Metropolitan Council had indicated they would approve <br /> putting the entire City in MUSA. <br /> Mr. Wilharber stated that Mr. Peterson stated that typically both sides of the street are <br /> assessed. Mr. Wilharber questioned why a portion of Hunter's Crossing is not being <br /> assessed to run the improvements down to the new development. He further noted he <br /> thinks the City should look at doing so. <br /> Mr. Wilharber stated that, if the development goes through, he would like sewer run <br /> under the road to him allowing a future hook up. He also stated that this would be in the <br /> best interest of the City, as they would not disturb the outlet for the new development to <br /> run sewer to his property in the future. <br /> Mr. Wilharber stated that he would like to pay for the costs to run the sewer under the <br /> road to the point where a roadway would be put in when his property develops in the <br /> future. <br /> Mr. Hannah, stated that he had been receiving a multitude of information and noted he <br /> has had trouble contacting some of the players on his side of the deal to discuss the <br /> Page 6 of 25 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.