My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2001-07-10 Agenda Packet
Centerville
>
Committees
>
Parks & Rec.
>
Agenda Packets
>
1997-2022
>
2001
>
2001-07-10 Agenda Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/27/2010 11:13:29 AM
Creation date
4/27/2010 11:13:15 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
107
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
June 5, 2001 <br /> Planning and Zoning Workshop Meeting Minntes <br /> Chairperson Hanson opened the public hearing at 6:34 p.m. <br /> Mr. March reviewed the Ordinance #4 amendments and indicated that the Commission <br /> may desire to set a maximum size for accessory structures in the M-1 district. Mr. March <br /> stated that the Commission would need to hold a public hearing concerning mini-storage <br /> before making the recommendation to Council. <br /> Commissioner Brainard asked Mr. March if he could survey the surrounding <br /> communities to determine the maximum size accessory structure in a M-1 district. <br /> Commissioner Kilian indicated he did not think the accessory structure should exceed the <br /> square footage of the principal structure. <br /> Mr. Wilharber stated he would like to see the information from surrounding communities <br /> and add a height restriction. <br /> Commissioner Kilian stated that the Commission had previously set a height restriction. <br /> Council Liaison Broussard Vickers suggested allowing accessory structures for ! <br /> residential use in a M-1 district to be fifty percent (50%) of the rear yard. <br /> Commissioner Kilian stated that he felt the Commission should indicate the structure <br /> could be 50% of the rear yard, but not to exceed the size of the principal structure. I <br /> Commissioner DeVine indicated that the Iots in downtown were split into 100-foot lots <br /> and some residents own mare than one (1) lot. Commission DeVine stated one (1) I <br /> resident would need to come before the Commission to rejoin the lots, which seems I <br /> unfair. <br /> Council Liaison Broussard Vickers stated that the property owner has the option to sell II <br /> the lots separately if they were divided and may not desire to rejoin them. <br /> Council Liaison Broussard Vickers stated that the Ordinance stated there must be a <br /> principal structure on the lot in order to build an accessory structure. <br /> Commissioner DeVine indicated he was concerned about how the suggested change <br /> would affect a property owner with more than one (1) lot, as they may be able to build a <br /> large building. <br /> Council Liaison Broussard Vickers stated that the requirement for the accessory structure <br /> not exceed the square footage of the principal structure, should limit the size of the <br /> accessory structures because she is unaware of any large principal structures in the <br /> downtown area. <br /> Commissioner DeVine indicated he felt the matter needed to be researched and further <br /> I discussed. <br /> Page 2 of 6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.