Laserfiche WebLink
� <br /> February 15, 2001 <br /> Council Meeting Minutes <br /> Council Member Nelson requested the modifications be made to the January 24, 2U01 <br /> meeting minutes: Page 4, where it indicates the type of exterior, building materials used <br /> on the rear of the building should ,indicate siding not brick. Where it states Mayor <br /> Swedberg requested Mr. Hoeft investigate the costs of electrical in LaMotte Park, it <br /> should state Mr. Peterson. In the adjournment motion, the wrong Council Member was <br /> inserted as- tlie� seconding member. Adjourned to the Executive Session, add a sentence <br /> indicating the topic of discussion. <br /> Motion bv Council Member Nelson, seconded by Cauncil Member Ca ra to <br /> approve the January 24, 2001 Council Minutes and the Januarv 31, 2001 Worksho� <br /> Meeting Minutes as amended. All in favor. Ayes — 3 Na,�s — 0 Abstain — 2 <br /> �Broussard Vickers and Travisl. Motion carried. <br /> VI. PETITIONS AND COMPLAINTS <br /> l. Tom Wilharber Complaint <br /> Mr. Tom Wilharber, 6849 Centerville Road, appeared before Council and questioned the <br /> reasoning for re-scheduling the meeting, noticing same, whether the meeting was re- <br /> scheduled to accommodate one (1) Council Member and whether Council felt they were <br /> in violation of the open meeting law regarding the re-scheduling. Mr. Wilharber stated <br /> that notice of the re-scheduling was not placed on the cable channel or in the Quad <br /> Community Press, as has been the practice in the past. <br /> Mr. March stated that he had received a telephone call requesting that the meeting date be <br /> modified. Mr. March stated that he told the caller he did not feel comfortable with re- <br /> scheduling the meeting unless he heard from a quorum of the Council Members. It had <br /> been noted that Mayor Swedberg was out of town and had mentioned an interest in <br /> having the date moved to Thursday. Mr. March stated that a third Council Member <br /> conta.ct him stating the re-scheduling the meeting was acceptable. Mr. March felt that <br /> subsequent to receiving a quorum requesting the re-scheduling, notice was place in the <br /> vestibule. Mr. March stated that a ten (10) day notice is not required; however, at least a <br /> three (3) day notice is required. An emergency meeting may be called with one (1) day <br /> notice. Mr. March stated that he was not sure of the exact date of the placement of the <br /> notice on the cable channel, but it was more than three (3) days prior to the meeting. <br /> Council Member Capra stated she had received an e-mail from Mr. March concerning the <br /> re-scheduling of t�e meeting. <br /> Mr. March stated after getting a quorum of calls he notified the other two (2) Council <br /> Members by e-mail stating that the meeting would be re-scheduled. <br /> Council Member Nelson stated she had call�d on the Monday of the week before the <br /> scheduled meeting date and asked Mr. March if the meeting could be re-scheduled due to <br /> conflicts with two (2) Council Member's schedules. Council Member Nelson stated that <br /> due to same, she requesteci that Mr. March check with the other Members to ascerta.in if <br /> the meeting could be re-scheduled. Council Member Nelson stated that she contact <br /> Council Member Capra to ascertain if the re-scheduling was acceptable to her and it was. <br /> Mr. March had e-mailed the other two (2) Council Members and Council Member Nelson <br /> Page 2 of 18 <br />