2001-02-07 Agenda Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

, I ' Mr. March explained due to the property being located near the creek and the size of the parcel some of the allowed uses for industrial property would not be allowed. He then � explained that the pole building would not be allowed to be reconstructed in the event of destruction b a natural disaster. Y Mrs. Yaeger expressed her concerns for truck traffic, diesel fuel smells and chemical smells if the property is rezoned to Industrial and the use of the property changes. Ms. Karen Maska, Brian Court, stated she believed she was building a house in a residential neighborhood and would not have built her home in that location if she were aware that the parcel would be rezoned to Industrial. She is very concerned that something louder, smellier and more disruptive to the neighborhood would come in should the property be rezoned to Industriai. Mr. Mark Radley, 7044 Cottonwood Court, questioned the need for a rezone to Industrial if the intention is to keep the same type of business there. He then asked the Commission to consider the fact that this parcel is bordered on three sides by property zone Residential. � Mrs. Stevens presented her tax statement to Chairperson Hanson, which indicated she is I currently taxed Residential and Commercial far the property. i Mr. March noted the properiy owner is requesting the entire parcel be rezoned to Industrial. The property owner had considered splitting the property, however, there is I no buildable area on the portion with the pole barn due to the floodway. The current tenant would like to continue to use the entire piece of property and can continue to operate the business under a Special Use Permit. I i Ms. Maska questioned how residents or the City could control the use of the property in the future. Mr. March indicated any new business would need a Special Use Permit, I which would require a public hearing to infortn residents and receive resident input. Mrs. Yaeger questioned whether there was a difference in which businesses could be located on the property if the parcel was zoned Commercial, rather than Industrial. Chairperson Hanson stated there were different businesses allowed under Commercial, rather than Industrial. Mrs. Yaeger questioned whether it was possible to split the parcel and leave the portion of the lot with the house on it Residential and zone the other Commercial. The Stevens indicated they did not have a preference either way for zoning but had received a request from the buyer of the property to request a rezone to Industrial as a condition of the sale. Mr. March explained the business could continue to operate as is under the currently issued Special Use Permit if the zoning remains the same. If the buyer of the property should want to redevelop in the future, rezoning to Industrial would be required. Page2of10