Laserfiche WebLink
Council Liaison Broussard Vickers questioned whether Mr. Schoberlein had a driveway <br /> easement and, if so, where it was Iocated. Mr. Schoberlein stated that he drives straight <br /> out to Centerville Road. <br /> Mr. John Lundbald, 6904 Centerville Road, stated that he had a valid easement that was <br /> part of the legal description for his property. <br /> Mr. March indicated it may be easier to address the driveway access issue by eliminating <br /> a couple of lots and centering the (2) two homes on the cul-de-sac at the north end of the <br /> development to provide better access far the two (2) properties in question. Mr. March <br /> stated that the Planning and Zoning Commission needed to determine whether the i <br /> development met the requirements of a PUD and either approve, deny, or table action. I <br /> � <br /> Commissioner LaMotte questioned the sewer force main running to the north of the I <br /> development. Mr. March stated that the Met. Council owned the force rnain and was in i <br /> the process of replacing the piping in that area. <br /> Mr. Joe Schwartz, 6882 Centerville Road, stated that he had concerns regarding the <br /> proposed trail that would run along his property. Mr. Schwartz stated that moved to <br /> Centerville to be outside of the inner city and was upset that the development was <br /> coming. <br /> Mr. Mike Carter, 6913 Sumac Court, stated that it could be possible for the development � <br /> to have houses in place prior to the opening of the new school, which concerned him. I <br /> Mr. Carter expressed a desire to have a park located within the development rather than <br /> receiving park dedication fees. Mr. Carter felt that a park was necessary to prevent I I <br /> children from crossing Main Street to go to the nearest park. Mr. Carter also expressed <br /> concern for increased traffic on Center Street. <br /> Ole Mersinger, 6936 Tourville Circle, expressed his concern for the safety of the children <br /> along Center Street if traffic volume is increased. <br /> Mr. Hannah, Ground Development, offered to amend the submitted plans to R-2 which <br /> would increase the minimum lot size if the City could guarantee appraval of the plans by <br /> December 15, 2000. Mr. Hannah stated that if the City were unable to come to tenns by <br /> December 15, 2000, Ground Development would not be developing the area. Mr. March <br /> advised the Commission against making any commitments to an R-2 plan since there <br /> would need to be a public hearing on the matter. <br /> ' Mr. Schwartz stated that he had received information from the previous owner of his <br /> ' property, which led him to beiieve, the area next to his lot would not be developed as it <br /> was a nature area and that was reason he purchased the property. Commissioner Brainard <br /> stated that it is the responsibility of property owner to research many areas prior to <br /> purchasing property, such as school district, sewer and water, undeveloped land nearby, <br /> etc. Commissioner Brainard stated that it is unreasonable to think the area would stay <br /> undeveloped in a growing community. <br /> Mr. Carter stated that in his opinion, Ground Development was pressuring the City to <br /> ' agree to their terms by a specific date. <br /> I <br />