Laserfiche WebLink
Park and Recreation Committee <br /> Report and Ideas from Wayne LeBlanc <br /> Dec 1, 1999 <br /> First, conbratulations on the City Council budget approval for Park and Rec! <br /> This repori is divided into 3 sections: <br /> 1. Trails letter to surrounding communities update. <br /> Z. Concerns sent to City Council <br /> 3. Followup on last months presentation. <br /> Trails Letter to Surroundin� Communities Uudate <br /> Apparently there was only one reply &om Arne Stefferud of the Metropolitan Council. Arne's letter referred to Rick ' <br /> Gelbmann who maintains a database of information. I called Rick and we could get electronic data, but need a license and I <br /> appropriate software. I asked about �et[ing a map, and be said he just needed a letter. So, I suggest the City send Rick <br /> Gelbmann, 230 East 5`� St, St Paul, MN 55101 a letter something like the below: I <br /> In a phone conversation with Wayne LeBlanc on Nov 30, you asked for a letter to be sent to obtain a map of plans in <br /> our area for trails. The City of Centerville is interested in a map showing existing trails and proposed or planned <br /> trails in the communities sunounding the City of Centerville. This would include Lino Lakes, White Bear Lake, <br /> Hugo, and township areas within a 7 mile or so radius of Centerville. Any other information you can provide would <br /> be welcome. Thank you... <br /> I also talked with Phylis Hanson and Johnathan Vlaming of the Met Council and got several leads on other people to call. <br /> When I outlined the rough plan to circle Centerville Lake and connect to the east, they suggested the City work with <br /> Anoka Co�n[y to get the trails in the master plan (they may have used another term). They said the suggested trails would <br /> fit very well and some are already in the master plan. They suggested Ron Cox at Anoka Parks as a good contact. , <br /> Concerns Sent to Ci� Council � <br /> In the handout, is a letter l discussed with City Council on Monday, Nov 22. They sent it to Park and Rec. My purpose <br /> was to make some of these issues more visible and I wasn't sure where the issues belonged (P&Z or what). <br /> Here are some suggestions on what to do with the issues (somewhat reworded): <br /> 1). Trail easement to narrow or trail easement being unknown by buyers. The cunent width of a trail easement is 6 feet on <br /> one side, 8 feet of trail, then 6 feet on the other side for a total of 20 feet. In my view, a Iot next to this would be quite <br /> undesirable. There is only 6 feet of "buffer: ' Codes in the city say buildings must be at least 10 feet from property lines. I <br /> suggest this needs to be wider. I'll not state a specific number. The other issue is people don't seem to know about <br /> easements. From Acorn Creek experience, it is clear that the existing system is not working. Developers are supposed to <br /> tell buyers where the easements are. Here aze some suggesuons: A). Ideally, infrastructure shoald be in place before <br /> � houses are sold. Roads are constructed before houses are sold. Trails could also be constructed before houses are so1d. This <br /> one ran perpendiculaz to the road and a trail on a property line perpendicular to the road, should not c;ause a developer a <br /> problem. (A sidewalk put in before construction is a problem.) So, here, require trails be put in before anything is sold. <br /> B). Require signs every 50 feet or so identifying easements. These would have to be' maintained by the developer. C). <br /> There needs to be a penalty or conseqnence for developers who don't follow the rules. A huge cash surety (to pay off <br /> people with a misunderstanding) or the ability to shut down the project quickly if something is not right. Most of this is <br /> probably a P&Z issue, but a recommendation from Park & Rec is the suggested process, I guess. <br /> 2). Abandonment of the Acorn Creek easement. I got the minutes of this transaction thanks to Aimee and it happened in <br /> 1995. The root of the problem is #1 above. Since this is a done deal and at least one nearby resident (Aimee) said it's okay <br /> as it is, I suggest no need to pursue it. However, something needs to be done to prevent the same thing in the future. The <br /> precedent I see, is that about the only trail ever planned for the City of Centerville was abandoned. This is not a very good <br /> record. <br /> 2 <br />