Laserfiche WebLink
. � ! <br /> Aimee Fairbrother (1844 Re�oir Street) stressed her and the neighborhoods cancerns <br /> about what was mentioned at the last Park and Recreation meeting about the vision of <br /> �� Acorn Creek Park bein� geared more towards adults. Ms. Fairbrother mentioned how the <br /> City is very focused on youth and a possible youth center in the City. She� went on further <br /> to explain that ihe Neighbarhood Netwark Committee �vent to 76 homes in the immediate <br /> area surrounding Acorn �'reek Park Out of the 76 homes, 63 u�ere available for <br /> comment. The survey included the number of children per household which totaled 114. <br /> Aimee went on further to explain the neighborhood (63%) wanted the park to be named <br /> Acorn Creek Park. <br /> Jeff Gibbons (72G3 Clear Ridge) questioned the open space - he felt Acorn Creek P�rk is a <br /> very large park. <br /> Loren Abrahamson (1868 Revoir) questioned what the average size park is and what is <br /> normal in a park the size of Acorn Creek? <br /> Intern James Bownik suggested that the City could choose to have the City Engineer do a <br /> survey of the park. , <br /> Michael Navin felt the Tracey NlcBride Park is about half the size of the Acorn Creek I <br /> Park Mr. Navin stressed the Park and Recreation Committee needs to consider what the �'� <br /> City has in mind as far as athletics. �' <br /> Tom Fairbrother (1$44 Revoir Street) questioned parking, and if it would be required to ' <br /> have designated parking. <br /> James Bownik felt it would be required to have a minimunl of handicap parking / off <br /> street parking versus no parking. <br /> Dale Larsan stated the Park and Recreation Committee is trying to gear the City parks to � <br /> all residents of Centeiville. Mr. Larson liszed se��eral parks and their ar��enities, adding it � <br /> would be nice to have a park for adults and family reunions, etc. Not that the adults using <br /> the parks will b� hobbling around with canes - we could still ha�ve ptayground equipment <br /> for the children. <br /> Tom Fairbrother (18�� Revoir Street} stated that the adults have the ability to drive to <br /> any park they choose to go to. The children aren't able to drive to other pat like the <br /> adults are, and that no matter what goes into the Acorn Creek Park, the children of the <br /> area will be there - no matter what. Adding, the other "proposed" park by the lake could <br /> be designed more for adults - it would be a perfect spot for adults and reunions, etc.. <br /> Jill Lien (1810 Haytield Road) questioned why the Acorn Creek Park cannot be designed <br /> , for both adults and children. Adding, if adults use the park for reunions, then their <br /> grandchildren will be usin� the playground e�uipment. This park is large enough to serve <br /> all ages. Why does it have to be one or the other'� <br /> -� <br /> � <br />