Laserfiche WebLink
� NIr. Nlarch expiained that i�1r. vlattke was appearing bef€�re t�ie Park and Recreation Committee <br /> because the ro ertv is not ss,heduled in the �1ti SA until 2�0 i. Modification of the daie will <br /> P P J <br /> need t� be approved by Council, alon� with some type of benefit/gain outside of the normal Park <br /> Dedicati�n Fees. t)nce the Park and Recreation Committee approv�s the proposed p?_an, a <br /> reeommendation will then n�ed to be forwarded to the Citv Couneii. <br /> Mr. Niattke preser�ted an offer of $2000 per lot compared to the exi�ting park dedication fee of <br /> $1200 per lot, with the c�ndition that the development be develop�d as a PUD, and the Mti SA is <br /> modif ed �o one year earlier than the original date for this property. �Iomes wi11 not be <br /> constructed until the end of summer/ea�ly fall, so there will only be roughly 6— 12 homes built <br /> next year, with the balance of the homes btiing built the fatlowing year. Mr. Mattke added that <br /> they are just ir, �he sketch plan phase. <br /> IYtr. iblarch mentioned that he spoke with iVlr. Jon VonDe�,inde, Ano��a County Parks D'uector, <br /> last week. Mr. VonDeLinde informed him that the rough grading for the trail around the south <br /> side of �enterville Lake will be�in next week Mr. March continued, statin� that there are 3—� <br /> acres of prc�pese� wetland in this proposed developmer_t. It would b� a nice amenit_v to have a <br /> trail around the wetland. Also, 'Vletro�olitan Council would hzve to approve mc�difying �he date <br /> change in the MUS� from 2001 to 2000 When Gor-em plats the property east ofthis proposed <br /> d�velopment, th� Park and Recreation C�mmittee will want to retain a trail easemer,t. From <br /> there, Gerald Rehb�in has already stated that he has no problem with a trail easement on his <br /> property, ir� fact, he wants to dedicat� some of his pro�erty f�r tax purposes. NIr. Ken Carpertier <br /> will have a problem with a trail easement on his prop�rty, so this could be an issue in the future. <br /> Where the trail will be placed once it �ets to Mr. Carpenter's nroperty will need further <br /> discussion. Mr. Wilharber owns the next t�%o parceis of �rand just south of the proposecl ' <br /> development. <br /> 1�lotion by i�lr. Navin, seconded by Mr. Larson to recom�end to City Council that �ark <br /> and Recreation w�ill recomm�nd advan�ceir�e��t/modification of the co�np pla� to one year <br /> earlier, at the developers expense with th� following condIltions: $2000 per lot in park <br /> dCC�,1CRtlOri teC5, �OI1Sii'UCIl0�1 01 � fl'�1'1 �ri(1!O1' IRCIUCY� SlCaervdlis5 n� ue��i�eu i��icS�niy ai <br /> developers expense. �ll in fa�or. 1�1�tion carried u�anim�usly. <br /> OLD BUSINESS <br /> Acorn Creek Park <br /> Mr. Navin questioned the balar�ce of the park dedication fee account, and if the letter was sent <br /> out to Mr. Travis re�arding the trail in the Woods of Clearwater Creek development. <br /> Nls, Lien stated that we czd� have a negativ� balance in tl�e park dedication accourit, and the <br /> letter was sent out ta �r. Travis on the l 8�"` of November. <br /> Ms. DeVine mentioned that people are parking in the �rass at Acorn Creek park, �nd that at <br /> some point in the future, a parking lot will be a necessity. <br /> Pa�e 2 of ( <br />