Laserfiche WebLink
. . <br /> Aimee Fairbrother (1844 Revoir Street) stressed her and the neighborhoods concerns <br /> about what was mentioned at the last Park and Recreation meeting about the vision of <br /> Acorn Creek Park being geared more towards adults. Ms. Fairbrother mentioned how the <br /> ' City is very focused on youth and a possible youth center in the City. She went on further <br /> � to explain that the Neighborhood Network Committee went to 76 homes in the immediate <br /> area surrounding Acorn Creek Park. Out of the 76 homes, 63 were available for <br /> comment. The survey included the number of children per household which totaled 114. <br /> Aimee went on further to explain the neighborhood (63%) wanted the park to be named <br /> Aeorn Creek Park. <br /> Jeff.Gibbons (7203 Clear Ridge) questioned_the open space - he felt Acorn Creek Park is a <br /> very large park. <br /> Loren Abraha.mson (1868 Revoir) questioned what the average size park is and wha.t is <br /> normal in a park the size of Acorn Creek? <br /> Intern James Bownik suggested thax the City could choose to have the City Engineer do a <br /> survey of the park. <br /> Michael Navin felt the Tracey McBride Park is about half the size of the Acorn Creek <br /> Park. Mr. Navin stressed the Park and Recreation Committee needs to consider what the <br /> City has in mind as far as athletics. <br /> Tom Fairbrother (1844 Revoir Street) questioned pa.rking, and if it would be required to <br /> have designated parking. <br /> James Bownik felt it would be required to have a.minimum of handicap pazking / off <br /> street parking versus no parking. <br /> Da1e Larson stated the Pa.rk and Recreation Committee is trying to gear the City pa.rks to <br /> all residents of Centerville. Mr. Larson listed several parks and their amenities, adding it <br /> would be nice to have a pa,rk for adults and family reunions, etc. Not that the adults using <br /> , the parks will be hobbling around with canes - we could still have playground equipment <br /> for the children. <br /> Tom Fairbrother (1844 Revoir Street) stated that the adults have the ability to drive to <br /> any park they choose to go to. The children aren't able to drive to other parks like the <br /> adults are, and that no matter what goes into the Acorn Creek Park, the children of the <br /> area will be there - no matter what. Adding, the other "proposed" park by the lake could <br /> ' be desi ed more for adults - it would be a erfect s ot for adults and reunions, etc.. <br /> � P P <br /> 7ill Lien (1810 Hayfield Road) questioned why the Acorn Creek Park cannot be designed <br /> for both adults and children. Adding, if adults use the park for reunions, then their <br /> grandchildren will be using the playground equipment. This park is lazge enough to serve <br /> all ages. Why does it have to be one or the other? <br /> 2 <br />