My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1999-06-02 Agenda Packet
Centerville
>
Committees
>
Parks & Rec.
>
Agenda Packets
>
1997-2022
>
1999
>
1999-06-02 Agenda Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/28/2010 9:30:53 AM
Creation date
4/28/2010 9:30:44 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
68
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
e . � r , <br /> � I� .. <br /> � goal is to come to agreement with Park and Recreation a.nd eventually go to th� City <br /> Council for Council endorsement. " <br /> PETITIONS AND COMPLAINTS <br /> UNFINISHED BUSINESS ; <br /> Steve Brown questioned what taok plaae at th� iast two meetings re�a.rding Acom Cr�ek <br /> Park: M'ichael Navin explained we started the meeting with a public hearing on Acom ' <br /> Creek Park. The Neighborhood Network Committee submitted information that inctuc�ed <br /> surveys, graphs, photos and petitions etc. Dale Larson concurred that the Park and <br /> . Re�reation Committee request�d the Neighborh�od Netwark Committee to submit a <br /> thumbnail sketch of their vision. " <br /> Tinrivfarch� mentioned that tlte Neighbarhooct l'det�work Committee had azrother�meetin� a <br /> couple of weeks after the Public Hearing. The goup came up with the initial phase of the <br /> park devel�pment. Mr. M.�rch showed the p�hans �that the Neighborhood �Network <br /> Committee came up with, which illustrated play equipment, benches, refuse containers etc. <br /> Dale Lazson questioned if ther� was menti�n of a picnic shelter anywhere. Mr: <br /> state.ci there wasn't a shelter in the plan, adding there are two major components: The first <br /> component is the play area (�quipm� and��the� s�nd���amponent is connecting the <br /> trailways. The Neighborhood Network Committee would like to see some trees m�ved <br /> into the park. . <br /> Da1e Larson felt the information submitbed� bythe Neighborhoad Network Committee was <br /> very nicely put together a.nd will help the Park and Recreation Committee considerably. <br /> Steve Brown questioned the doltar amount of th� quot� submitted by the Neighborhqod <br /> Network Committee. Michael Navin felt th�at the Park and Recreation Committee needs <br /> to be more prudent with the City's funds. <br /> Tim March explained that the City would have to accept bids on anything over $25,000.00. <br /> Mr. Ma.rch gave a breakdown of the grant budget as follows: <br /> $55,500 for the play structwe <br /> , 2�000 for grading the entire park � <br /> 5,000 for hydro seeding <br /> 7,900 for 575 lineai feet of asphalt tcail <br /> 3,100 for designing the park <br /> 9;000 for concrete sidewalk <br /> 3,500 for trail between benches and play structure <br /> 4,533 for 12" wood mulch <br /> $90,533 - Tota1 <br /> Mr. Gibbons menrioned he works for the l}epartment of Transportation and has �a �litt�e.bit <br /> of design experience. He offered that 1 1/2 inches of bituminous trail wouldn't be very <br /> adequate. He suggested ganulau rnateriai with a good �sub-cut material would hotdup . <br /> 2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.