My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1999-06-02 Agenda Packet
Centerville
>
Committees
>
Parks & Rec.
>
Agenda Packets
>
1997-2022
>
1999
>
1999-06-02 Agenda Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/28/2010 9:30:53 AM
Creation date
4/28/2010 9:30:44 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
68
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
. - <br /> , r � , <br /> �,' _- <br /> �` Na�min of �ent�rvLe par . <br /> Michael �Navin �questioned why/ wha �putthis on�the �agenda: Ms: Lien +affered��sh� adc�ed <br /> it to the agenda because th�re were a couple of parks in the city that aren't named. After <br /> discussing�tne� parks, it was��d�termfrrect�tha�t there�a�twa parks that are wmam+�: B�th <br /> parks are located near Roya1 Meadows and are connected. The Park and Recreation <br /> C�nitte+e etected to na�erthe�twQ parks Royal �M+cactows Park - all as on� This <br /> will be recommended to Council for approval. <br /> l�f'ichaet Navin wanted to n+�te on the� re.�ard�that itisvery� nice �having M�. �;ierr attend�ng <br /> the Park and Recreation Meetings. Adding it's nice to have all the color coded <br /> infarmation and the minutes typecl up �sa . meely, <br /> Tim March explained a developer is proposing 15 single family lots on a 10 acre parcel of <br /> ian+d just�east� of The Woods of £l�earwaterCre�etc d+evelopmem which woutd be ca�led <br /> Dcer Pass. Mr. March also mentioned there is another parcel of 20 acres of undeveloped <br /> Iand just north �f that. There have been� questi�ns from residents within the area. <br /> pertaining to sidewalk access to the park. Mr. March suggested a trail easement with a � <br /> paved trai��installed to the plat �oundaryta the�north �and �anae the 2U acres�nortlr of this is � <br /> developed, the City could have the developer of that parcel connect to the trail stub and <br /> p�ve� s waildng trail to the north �sicte oftY+carn �reek �ark. � <br /> I <br /> Ntr. Navin asked if Brian Drive will continue north? Mr. March explained it may be ! <br /> difficuit to �extend the roadway north depend'urg on w�tland �or soil conditions; but.�t � <br /> would be possible. Da1e Larson felt the trail should be paved right away. If someone is I <br /> urterested in purchasing property a�ong the trai�, they know it is there� and theymake the I <br /> choice before they purchase. �� <br /> 3eff Cribbans offered another� aiternative� �tor put in s�boardwtttk �r �bridg� mm�ing to �he � <br /> west over the wetland. This option would not require any wetland filling. ', <br /> Steve �rown questioned how big the wetla�d� area �is? <br /> Tim March stated the wettand is approximately 350 feet wide in some spots. Mr. March <br /> � mentian+ed a�oating bridge�maybe very�exp+ensive to construct and mainta�in: - 1�Ir.�N�aFch <br /> was unaware if a permit could be allowe�l to construct a floating bridge over a DNR <br /> prote+cted w+�t�and. <br /> Jeff firibbons �expressetl his thanks tv the Park anc� itecreation Committee for allowing �l�im <br /> to participat� in the meeting, but unfortunately had other commitments in which to attend. <br /> Mr. Navin asked Mr. March� whar the City needs frrnn the �Park and Recrearion Commi�ee <br /> regarding the new Deer Pass devetopment? Mr. March responded that the Park and <br /> Recreation Committee needs to �decide� if they wouh� I'rke cash �or land for the required <br /> park dedication. � <br /> 5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.