My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2010-05-05 P & R Agenda Packet
Centerville
>
Committees
>
Parks & Rec.
>
Agenda Packets
>
1997-2022
>
2010
>
2010-05-05 P & R Agenda Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/3/2010 7:54:37 AM
Creation date
5/3/2010 7:54:34 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
TO: Parks & Recreation Committee <br /> FROM: Kim Stephan <br /> DATE: Apri130, 2010 <br /> SUBJECT: Committee's Pergola Recommendation to City Council <br /> The following motion was made by the Parks & Recreation Committee at the Apri17, 2010 P& R Meeting: <br /> Motion was made by Committee Member Haiden, seconded by Committee Member Seeley to recommend <br /> City Council suggest Mr. Statz, City Engineer submit the plans for the bid process to include both options <br /> of wood timber and concrete posts for the pergola in Corner Stone Park including the footings with the <br /> pergola, having no requirement for footings if the pergola is not built. All in favor. Motion carried I <br /> unanimously. <br /> Mr. Statz's response via email (prior to City Council meeting 4/14/10) with respect to the Pergola: <br /> I <br /> 1. I don't think we can bid it with an either/or for concrete or timber posts. They would have different <br /> footing connections, etc. If we bid it as either/or, it would be up to the contractor, not us, which <br /> would be used. If we bid them as alternates, we're then stacking alternates on top of altemates. <br /> You'd have an alternate to put the pergola in or not and then an alternate within that alternate for the I <br /> selection of the posts. At any rate, it should be easy enough to get you guys some photos of each and <br /> we can decide at your next meeting. If we get it done in time, we could issue an addendum or wait <br /> and do it as a change order. Long story short, it will be more work to bid them together than it will <br /> be to change later. For now, the plans will show concrete. <br /> 2. I doubt we could put the pergola anywhere else along the trail and still use the grant money to pay <br /> for it. Our application was pretty specific about the idea of a trailhead type park. It really didn't talk <br /> about other amenities along the trail. Also, I'm not sure this pergola would fit in to the landscape by <br /> itself. As you mention in your notes, its purpose is to provide a sense of "scale" to the park. I'm not <br /> sure how to convince people that that is important. We've shown everyone the sort of 3-D drawings <br /> with the pergola, etc. Aside from that, I'd just have to say: trust our Landscape Architect. Anyway, <br /> we'II have the pergola in the bid as an alternate. The footings and everything else that goes with it, <br /> will be included in that alternate. It's all or nothing. <br /> The following excerpt is from the City Council Meeting Minutes of April 14, 2010: <br /> Parks & Recreation Committee's Recommendation to Council to Authorize Bonestroo Engineering to <br /> Commence Bid Process to Construct a Pergola in Corner Stone Pazk. <br /> City Engineer Statz reviewed background information stating he would recommend the City Council authorize <br /> bidding only the concrete posts, stating the City could decide to change after seeing samples if they wished. It <br /> was the consensus of the Council for Staff to proceed with the bid process for concrete posts for the pergola in <br /> Corner Stone Park. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.