Laserfiche WebLink
Parks & Recreation Committee <br /> Meeting Minutes 04-07-10 <br /> Mr. Tom Lee offered his services to help organize the $K and said his PA system was available if <br /> needed. Chairperson Branch said he thought a bullhorn would probably work better. <br /> IV. CONSIDERATION OF MINUTES <br /> March 3, 2010 Parks & Recreation Committee Meeting Minutes <br /> Committee Member Haiden requested a typo be corrected on page 6 of 8 changing `Tracie McBride <br /> Memorial McBride' to `Tracie McBride Memorial Park'. <br /> Motion was made by Committee Member Seeley, seconded by Committee Member Peterson, to <br /> approve the March 3, 2010 Parks & Recreation Committee Meeting Minutes as is. Ayes — 4, <br /> Nays — 0, Abstain — 3(Branch, Haiden, Amundsen) Motion carried. <br /> V. COMMITTEE BUSINESS <br /> Review Per�ola Plans per Mr. Mark Statz, Citv Engineer <br /> Mr. Statz, City Engineer requested the committee review a sketch of the proposed pergola with <br /> sandblasted concrete posts to match the treatment of the sidewalks and fountain curb. The only thing <br /> he re4uested the committee look at was whether or not they would approve the concrete posts (four <br /> corner posts). Other choices would be steel (more expensive, more maintenance) or timber <br /> (susceptible to vandals). He sta.ted the concrete design would be Bonestroo's recommendation, but we <br /> are open to whatever the committee may suggest. <br /> The committee discussed the options of wood timbers versus concrete posts and felt without seeing <br /> what the posts would look like it was hard to determine and would like the bids to be solicited with <br /> both timber and concrete posts. They would also like to request Mr. Statz supply a picture of what <br /> each would look like as well as the dimensions of the pergola. The committee was not opposed to the <br /> durability of the concrete posts, but felt it would look more appealing with timbers. The committee I <br /> removed the pergola from the original plan for multiple reasons; it was too expensive and were <br /> concerned what the impression of the community would be to spending these funds at this time and 2) <br /> they felt it was too big for this particular park. The committee was under the impression that if the <br /> pergola was submitted as an alternate and it was determined to be not within the budget that the <br /> footings would be installed without the pergola for consideration at a later date. If the pergola is not <br /> built the committee would prefer the footings not be put into place, they would like the footings a.nd <br /> pergola to be in the bid together. Mayor Capra suggested that if the pergola is within the budget and <br /> included in the plan that it could be moved to another location as long as it is trailside. Ms. Stephan <br /> will ask this question of Mr. Sta.tz. Mayor Capra clarified the bid process with alternates in that if <br /> there are multiple alternates included and they come in within budget the City can accept all the <br /> alternates or single options if there are more than one. So for instance the pergola could be added and <br /> not the kiosk or vise-versa. The landscape designers for Bonestroo felt the pergola would give a nice <br /> balance to the fountain instead of the fountain looking so big and standing alone in the pazk. <br /> Motion was made by Committee Member Haiden, seconded by Committee Member Seeley to <br /> recommend City Council suggest Mr. Statz, City Engineer submit the plans for the bid process <br /> to include both options of wood timber and concrete posts for the peegola in Corner Stone Park <br /> , 3 of 8 <br />