Laserfiche WebLink
Parks & Recreation Committee <br /> Meeting Minutes 04-07-10 <br /> <br />Mr. Tom Lee offered his services to help organize the 8K and said his PA system was available if <br />needed. Chairperson Branch said he thought a bullhorn would probably work better. <br /> <br />IV. CONSIDERATION OF MINUTES <br /> <br />March 3, 2010 Parks & Recreation Committee Meeting Minutes <br /> <br /> ‘ <br />Committee Member Haiden requested a typo be corrected on page 6 of 8 changingTracie McBride <br />Memorial McBride’ to ‘Tracie McBride Memorial Park’. <br /> <br /> <br />Motion was made by Committee Member Seeley, seconded by Committee Member Peterson, to <br />approve the March 3, 2010 Parks & Recreation Committee Meeting Minutes with the above <br />correction. Ayes – 4, Nays – 0, Abstain – 3 (Branch, Haiden, Amundsen) Motion carried. <br /> <br />V. COMMITTEE BUSINESS <br /> <br />Review Pergola Plans per Mr. Mark Statz, City Engineer <br /> <br />Mr. Statz, City Engineer requested the committee review a sketch of the proposed pergola with <br />sandblasted concrete posts to match the treatment of the sidewalks and fountain curb. The only thing <br />he requested the committee look at was whether or not they would approve the concrete posts (four <br />corner posts). Other choices would be steel (more expensive, more maintenance) or timber <br />(susceptible to vandals). He stated the concrete design would be Bonestroo’s recommendation, but we <br />are open to whatever the committee may suggest. <br /> <br />The committee discussed the options of wood timbers versus concrete posts and felt without seeing <br />what the posts would look like it was hard to determine and would like the bids to be solicited with <br />both timber and concrete posts. They would also like to request Mr. Statz supply a picture of what <br />each would look like as well as the dimensions of the pergola. The committee was not opposed to the <br />durability of the concrete posts, but felt it would look more appealing with timbers. The committee <br />removed the pergola from the original plan for multiple reasons; it was too expensive and were <br />concerned what the impression of the community would be to spending these funds at this time and 2) <br />they felt it was too big for this particular park. The committee was under the impression that if the <br />pergola was submitted as an alternate and it was determined to be not within the budget that the <br />footings would be installed without the pergola for consideration at a later date. If the pergola is not <br />built the committee would prefer the footings not be put into place, they would like the footings and <br />pergola to be in the bid together. Mayor Capra suggested that if the pergola is within the budget and <br />included in the plan that it could be moved to another location as long as it is trailside. Ms. Stephan <br />will ask this question of Mr. Statz. Mayor Capra clarified the bid process with alternates in that if <br />there are multiple alternates included and they come in within budget the City can accept all the <br />alternates or single options if there are more than one. So for instance the pergola could be added and <br />not the kiosk or vise-versa. The landscape designers for Bonestroo felt the pergola would give a nice <br />balance to the fountain instead of the fountain looking so big and standing alone in the park. <br /> <br />Motion was made by Committee Member Haiden, seconded by Committee Member Seeley to <br />recommend City Council suggest Mr. Statz, City Engineer submit the plans for the bid process <br />to include both options of wood timber and concrete posts for the pergola in Corner Stone Park <br />3 of 8 <br /> <br />