My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2010-05-11 Packet
Centerville
>
Planning & Zoning
>
Agenda Packets
>
1994-2022
>
2010
>
2010-05-11 Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/7/2010 2:10:26 PM
Creation date
5/7/2010 2:10:24 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City of Centerville <br /> Planning and Zoning Commission <br /> Also, concern was raised over creating more nonconforming uses in the City. Staff <br /> was directed to come up with code language to implement the medium and high <br /> density zoning areas identified in the plan. <br /> C. Nonconforming uses. The Commission discussed the input that was received from <br /> the public this evening. City Attorney Glaser will investigate possible options and will <br /> report back in writing before the April meeting. The Commission discussed the <br /> possibility of a joint work session with the City Council for April or May, 2010. <br /> D. Residential Accessory Structures and Setbacks. Resident Kurt Frison had <br /> requested that P&Z consider reducing the side-yard setback for garages and accessory ' <br /> buildings. Staff confirmed that several neighboring communities have a five-foot ', <br /> setback as compared to Centerville's 10 foot requirement. Those with a five-foot � <br /> setback include White Bear Lake, Vadnais Heights, Lino Lakes and Blaine. The ! <br /> Commission discussed some adverse impacts of a reduced setback. Among those are: a I <br /> narrower setback would make it impossible for the property owner to get a vehicle to I <br /> the rear yard along that side; if two garages on neighboring parcels faced one another, <br /> the buildings would be ten feet apart, even less if ineasured at the roof overhang; <br /> drainage swales along that side of the property would be more difficult with the <br /> reduced distance. Staff was directed to prepare draft code language tha.t would <br /> implement the reduced setback but taking into account the adverse impacts mentioned. <br /> V. CONSIDERATION OF NIINUTES <br /> 1. December 1, 2009 Meeting Minutes (Januar�meetin� cancelled Februarv I �i <br /> meetin�lacked a quorum) ' <br /> Motion bv Commissioner Pangell, seconded bv Commissioner Wood , to approve the <br /> December 1, 2009 minutes as nresented. All in favor. Motion carried. <br /> VI. PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING ADJOURNMENT <br /> Motion bv Commissioner Mosher, seconded bv Commissioner Pan�ell to adiourn the <br /> Meeting at 9:1Q p.m. All in favor. Motion carried unanimouslv. <br /> Transcribed by: <br /> Dallas Larson, Administrator <br /> Page 3 of 3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.