Laserfiche WebLink
Overall, the proposed 2011 General Fund expenditures totaled roughly $2,0A88O0ora <br />696 decrease from 2010. For Qroph|nm| representation of expenditures please see appendix C <br />and D. <br />Fund Balance <br />General Fund: The City of Centerville has historically maintained a healthy fund balance, <br />which contributes positively to the city's bond rating and mitigates the potential for needing short <br />hann borrowing. Council has m targeted fund balance reserve of 40 to 5096 of current <br />expenditures ora target between ($838.84Oho$1,048.30O). The below represents the last three <br />years of historic general fund balance and the next two years projected general fund balances <br />based on budgeted date. Please note that the City is projecting afundba|anoeof$1.123.405ot <br />the end nf2011. which |a53Y6nf2O11 budgeted expenditures. <br />2007 $1,435,164 <br />2008 $1 <br />2009 $1,231,325 <br />2010 $1,151,395 <br />2011 $1,123495 <br />Tax Rate / Tax Capacity <br />The general tax rate has been relatively stable over the last three years—with 2007. <br />2OO8. and 2O0Q having city tax rates of45.74% and 4G.25%.respectively, Given overall <br />market valuations in the City have fallen by roughly 7% (in tax capacity terms) the tax rate rose to <br />54.3596in2010. Market valuations again fell another 7% (in tax capacity terms) for 2011 so the <br />overall tax rate is projected to rise again to 58.6796 in 2011 . That being said, the tax rate is only <br />one of the two variables one must consider before evaluating the true effect on their respective <br />property taxes—the other |o the 2011 tax capacity. Cities in Minnesota levy actual dollar amounts <br />and the tax rate is merely the formula for a||ooediog the share to each parcel. For a graphical <br />representation of historic tax rates and e real vvur|d example of its effects on the City portion of <br />property tax see appendix E. <br />Debt Service Fund BudoatSummmmam/ <br />'- <br />The City currently has five outstanding bond iaouea--200413, 2005A, 2007A 2000A, <br />2000B. Outstanding principal obligations for these five bond innumo are $10.025.000 at August <br />31,2010. <br />Debt Service Revenue: Each bond issue |o supported bya levy (2O0AB series being the <br />only exception) and on assortment of special assessments. The Debt service fund budget/levy <br />and special assessment budgets for 2O11 are $528.800 and $284,700 respectively. <br />Debt Service Expenditures- Debt Service expenditures include principal and inNen*a1 <br />payments on the respective bond issues along with fiscal agent fees associated with their annual <br />