Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1998-06-10 Packet I � CITY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA WEDNESDAY, JUNE 10, 1998 /CA* 6:00 p.m. TO ORDER Roll Call PUBLIC HEARING (S) t/III. APPEARANCES Carolyn rude - Ehlers and Associates V� ing for the 20th Avenue Sewer and Water Project. L ondiug for Parkview Development Refunding the `87 Street Bond through the Local Bank R. Bill Bisek - Rockin Hollywoods - October 10, 1998 v CONSIDERATION OF MINUTES /1" May 20, 1998 Special Meeting Minutes /Q May 27, 1998 Council Meeting Minutes UfG. ZPAYM NT OF CLAIMS he City of Centerville May 27 - 31 he Centennial Fire District May 27, 1998 / The Centennial Fire District June 3, 1998 \ SET AGENDA V71; PETITIONS AND COMPLAINTS II. UNFINISHED BUSINESS Terminal Transport - Special Use Permit Rick Car son - Parkview Development e elopers Agreement nal Plat Final Grading Plan Resolution 98 -13 Approve Plans and Specification and Authorize Advertisement of Bids for Parkview Development LaMotte Park 21st Avenue Road Construction Sr. Housing - Barett House and Garage Contract with Dean Johnson Tobacco Ordinance X. ; UNESS Gymnastics - Sketch Plan COMMITTEE REPORTS V� ISTRATORS REPORT June 23, 1998 Joint Meeting ° be (G. c ..l rw-4 CONSENT AGENDA I. ADJOURNMENT *Newsletter entry due date is June 24, 1998. WEEK S N REV S EW Edition # 62 6 -1 -98 through 6 -5 -98 ----------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------- Building permits issued this period = 6 Building permits issued YTD = 97 * Another meeting of the funding formula sub - committee of the Joint Police Task Force was held on Monday evening. The goal of this group is to recommend an equitable funding formula to the task force in regards to a three city police department. The four variables that are being analyzed for a formula are as follows : number of calls, population, miles of streets, and market valuation. The sub - committee has another meeting scheduled for 7/12/98. The sub - committee expects to have a recommendation to forward to the task force in time for the full task force meeting scheduled for June 29 at 7:00 at Centerville City Hall. I will deliver additional information to the City Council as it becomes available. * The attendance at the Planning and Zoning meeting filled the Council chambers and the front lobby on Tuesday evening. There were four public hearings and four sketch plans presented at the meeting. The most controversial issue was the request from Lake Area Utilities to rezone their entire property to commercial. This request met with much opposition from those in attendance. A sketch plan was presented for the Moore Property (north of the Brian Drive extension), Starfire Gymnastics (a 14,520 sq. ft. training center proposed to be constructed south of Eagle Trucking) and the commercial building to be constructed by Husnik Homes on the lot north of Main Street and east of Peterson Trail. These issues will be discussed at the next Council meeting. , * I heard through the real estate appraiser that Herman Strehlow may be dropping his contestment of the assessments on his property. He has had two offers on his property in the Industrial Park. He apparently feels that the market is showing the potential benefit to his property from the installation of sewer and water. The appraiser received a call from Russ Strehlow (Herman's son) who then communicated this information to her. * A meeting was held with Andrew Melcher of St. Genevieve's Church. He indicated that the church would be willing to pay the watermain extension assessment on their vacant land, if the entire assessment could be placed on the south parcel of their property only. They would then not have to connect to the water system if their well malfunctioned at the building that the own on Heritage Street. They would be willing to pay for an additional water service now for the future service to the same building, if water was also extended down Heritage street sometime in the future. This item will be discussed in more detail when we hold the assessment hearing for the Parkview Development. * RJ Ryan, the contractor for Terminal Transport, stopped in City Hall Friday morning to complete an application for a building permit for their proposed building in the Industrial Park. They also submitted a revised set of building plans. Included in these plans were a revised landscape plan which now shows tree plantings on the south and west sides of the property. These tree plantings will serve to screen the parking lot from Cedar Street as well as 20th Avenue. The special use permit for this property will be discussed at the next Council meeting. Howard R. Green Company CONSULTING ENGINEERS �rvsrc77rcascts¢as Formerly MSA Consulting Engineers June 5, 1998 File: 260000m -0325 Honorable Mayor, Council, and City Staff Centerville City Hall 1880 Main Street Centerville, MN 55038 RE: PROPOSALS FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES TOUR OF HOWARD R. GREEN OFFICE Dear Mayor, Council, and Staff: We received your letter dated May 22, 1998 informing us that we were selected as one of the four final firms to be interviewed for your Engineering Services. We sincerely appreciate your interest in continuing to consider us for your Engineering Services. The letter you sent also requested a site tour of our office. We would be delighted to have you visit our office and tour our facilities. This tour is scheduled for Friday, June 12 at 1:00 p.m. We hope all of you can make it to the tour. Again, thank you for selecting us to be included on your short list of firms to be considered for Engineering Services. We look forward to the interviews that you will conduct in August. Until then, if there is anything we can do for you, please do not hesitate to call. Sincerely, Howard R. Green Company (w& U David E. Nyberg, P.E. Project Manager Cc: Mr. Ralph Russell, President, Howard R. Green Company Mr. Terry Maurer, Howard R. Green Company O: tPROJl260000mi000- 0504.1une. da 1326 Energy Park Drive • St. Paul, MN 55108 • 612/644 -4389 fax 612/644 -9446 toll free 8881368 -4389 JUN—e4-1998 1c:25 r, nr�eiv O Howard R, Green Compan +►' CONSULTING ENGINEERS ° w��ry Asa canewrng Engines WEEK IN REVIEW ENGINEERING MUM MAY 27 — JUNE 2, 1998 PROTECTS IN DESIGN LAURIE LAMOTTE PARK P ark Layout GradlU Plan We will be discussing the proposed plan at the Park and Recreation Committee meeting on June 3 ". We have discussed the wetiand issues with the Rice Creek Watershed District. We have ducumentation that some of the wetlands were coated and are therefore non-jurisdictional, T'tis will signifimily lessen the cost of wetland mitigation for the project. Our recommendation to the Park and Recreation Committee will be to recommend the City Council authotize preparation of plaits and specifications for the project. TAKE AREA UTILITIES FEASIBE ITY Ftasibilily Study We are waiting for the petitioner of the feasibility study to prepare a preliminary plat for development of the parcel. This plat will be presented at the July Planning and Zoning mi:eting. 21ST AVENUE ROAD CONSTRUCTION L no Lakes issues No additional issues to report on coordlm0on with Lino Lakes. A Joint City Council meeting hs been considered to discuss the interconnect and road agreements. PARKVIEW ADDITION Pl at. Grading Plan. and Municipal Improvements 'A e will be present at the June 10P Council meeting to review the project. At that meeting, the developer is necking approval of plans, the plat, and the developers agreement and authorization to bid the project. 000 {401.1un,.wnek in Review Page 1 13Z i Energy Pent Drive • 51. Paul, MN 55108 • 812f644-4388 fax 66121644 toll free 8881388 -4388 JUN -04 V:�VU 14: db EAGLE PASS 2 ADDITION (north of Parkview Addition, south of Eagle Pass) S kcsch.Pla� We have completed a preTuninary review of a sketch plan for this proposed development submitted by Gor -Em Development, Inc. We will review our comments with the City Council at a future City Council meeting. The developer has signed the right -of -way acquisition documents that were provided to City staff for obtaining right -of -way through Eagle Pass 2 Addition for the Parkview Addition project. This right-of- will allow for a connection of Parkview Road with Dupre Road. PROJECTS IN CONSTRUCTION 26rrr AVFNTX WATERMAIN AND SANITARY SEWER 'A ork on the lift station began this week. The sanitary sewer on the east side of 20 Avenue will be constructed first, We are continuing to discuss an alternate foreemain alignment through the lake Area Utilities property to save additional trees. CHAUNCEY BARETT GARDENS The Contractor will be completing punch list items on this project in the near future. ACORN CREEK A -irk on replacement of broken sidewalk throughout the project is continuing. EAGLE PASS 1 h a will be discussing construction of the trails and park with the developer later this week. MUON' GLEN N new issues to report on this project. LAKELAND HILLS No new issues to report on this project, Rpreen Company CONSULTING ENGINEERS SLPJ -04 -1999 14:26 - P.04iO4 $TIiS1TE5 AND REPORTS CENTERVILLE SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN S a t ioreland Ordinance Tire 5horeland Ordinance is on the July Pla nning and Zoning agenda. CC0.0401.jnne ,,,,,,,,,,w-,.2.9 Iowa `-^ Ri ee ! Company Ipa ny CONSULTING ENGINEERS TOTAL P.04 MEMO DATE ; June 5, 1998 TO Honorable Mayor and Council FROM : Jim March RE Appearance of Carolyn Drude Carolyn Drude (Financial Advisor from Ehlers and Assoc.) will be present to discuss three items. The first item will be the bond issuance for the 20th Avenue sewer and water extension project. Included in your packet is the relevant information from the Official Statement for this bond issuance. The second item Carolyn will address is the refunding of the 87 street bond. I have asked Carolyn to draft a proposal form that we could submit to Firstar. I reported the potential savings to the City on this subject in my "Week in Review" issue #61. We have a great opportunity to work with the local bank to reduce the interest that we are paying on this bond, to eliminate the fiscal agent fees that we are currently paying, as well as save the bond issuance costs if we were to solicit new proposals in the open market. The last issue Carolyn will comment upon will be the timing for bonding the Parkview Development. This bond issuance will include the costs for looping the watermain to the senior housing site as well as a extension to Center Street, An assessment hearing will have to be held after we receive the bids for this project. le the opinion of Bum! CuutcTel. the wroevt nn the Blinds is eve wpr ....r nwaian Us the State of Nlinnesnm will its subdivisions and nuuticipalities and dte interest to be paid nn fle Bonds is gat ia( h.dible in the guess income t jlhe recipient yin United Stares or State of Nfinne.enn income rax purposes (bur i.s,subjeir ra federal ahetrnarn a witrnntrw trues au n)pororioas a ... I Ah we ..ni lioachise Mies hnlwsed na corp, ... omits, including Imam lid in.sinution . told measw ell by net incanre mad the alterundve nimi...on toe base) ronlbµ a present federal wnrl hfirwesatw Iona, regulations, rulings and decisions. (See "Tax Eeemption "lie, ein.) 7'he Issuer n ill designrtre the Bonds ns "qualified tax-exempt obligations" purvtant fn Section 265 of the bttemal Revenue Code of 1986, its amended. +vhiclt permit., Jinnncinl i ... rimmm, m deduct uneven expenses oBocable m the Bonds re) the esters pe, mined under prior Imc. New Issue Non -Rated OFFICIAL STATEMENT DATED MAY 28, 1998 . CITY OF CENTERVILLE, MINNESOTA $720,000* GENERAL OBLIGATION SEWER AND WATER REVENUE BONDS, SERIES 1998 PROPOSAL OPENING: June 10, 1998, 11:00 A.M., C.T. CONSIDERATION: June 10, 1998,6:00 P.M., C.T. PURPOSFIAUTHORiTY /SECURITY: The $720,000• General Obligation Sewer and Water Revenue Bonds, Series 1998 (the "Bonds ") are being issued pursuant to Minnesota Snuutes, Chapters 444 and 475, to provide funds for sanitary sewer and water main improvements in the City of Centerville, Minnesota (the "City "). The Bonds will be general obligations of the City for which the City will pledge its full faith, credit and taxing powers. The Bonds will be in Iully registered loon as to both principal and interest and will be in integral multiples of $5,000 each. Delivery is subject to receipt of approving legal opinions of Kennedy & Graven, Chartered, of Nlinneapolis, Minnesota. DATE OF BONDS: July 1, 1998. MATURITY: February I as follows: Year Amount- Year Amount 2000 $60,000 2005 $75,000 2001 60,000 2006 75,000 2002 65,000 2007 80,000 2003 65,000 2008 85,000 2004 70,000 2009 85,000 -The City reserves the right to increase or decrease the amount of individual maturities on the day of sale, in increments of $5,000 each. TERM BOND OPTION: All dates are inclusive. Proposals for the Bonds may contain a maturity schedule providing for any combination of serial bonds and term bonds, subject to mandatory redemption, so long as the amount of principal maturing or subject to mandatory redemption in each year conforms to the ntmurity schedule set forth above. REDEMPTION: Bonds maturing February 1, 2006 and thereafter are subject to call for prior redemption on February 1, 2005 and any date thereafter, at par. INTEREST: February 1, 1999 and semiannually thereafter, MININIUM PROPOSAL: $711,065. r GOOD FAITH DEPOSIT: $14,400, payable to the City. PAYING AGENT: Firstar Bank of Minnesota, N.A., St. Paul, Minnesota. BOOK - ENTRY -ONLY: See "Book- Entry -Only System" herein. This Official Statement will be further supplemented by an addendum specifying the offering prices, interest rates, aggregate principal amount, principal amount per maturity, anticipated delivery date, and underwriter, together with any other information required by law, and, as supplemented, shall constitute a "Final Official Statement" of the Issuer with respect to the Bonds, as defined in S.E.C. Rule 15c2 -12. 3060 Centre Pointe Drive Roseville, Minnesota 55113 -1105 Ehlers & Associates, Inc. (612) 697 -8500 • FAX (612) 697 -8555 www.ehiers- inc.com 40 LEADERS IN PUBLIC FINANCE Offices in Roseville, MN • Brookfield, WI .e COMPLIANCE WITH S.E.C. RULE 15c2.12 Municipal obligations (issued in an aggregate amount over $1,000,000) are subject to General Rules and Regulations, Securities Exchange Act Of 1934, Rule 15c2 -12 Municipal Securities Disclosure (the "Rule "). Official Statement: This Official Statement was prepared for the Issuer for dissemination to potential customers. Its primary purpose is to disclose information regarding the Obligations to prospective underwriters in the interest of receiving competitive proposals in accordance with _ the sale notice contained herein. Unless an addendum is received prior to the sale, this document shall be deemed the "Near Final Official Statement'. Review Period: This Official Statement has been distributed to members of the legislative body and other public officials of the Issuer as well as to prospective bidders for an objective review of its disclosure. Comments or omissions or inaccuracies must be submitted to Ehlers & Associates at least two business days prior to the sale. Requests for additional information or corrections in the Official Statement received on or before this date will not be considered a qualification of a proposal received from an underwriter. If there are any changes, corrections or additions to the Official Statement, interested bidders will be informed by an addendum at least one business day prior to the sale. Final Official Statement: Upon award of sale of the Obligations, the legislative body will authorize the preparation of an addendum to the Official Statement that includes the offering prices, interest rates, aggregate principal amount, principal amount per maturity, anticipated delivery date and other information required by law and the identity of the Syndicate Manager and Syndicate Members. This addendum, together with any previous addendum of corrections or additions to the Official Statement, shalt be deemed the complete Final Official Statement. Copies of the Final Official Statement will be delivered to the underwriter (Syndicate Manager) within seven business days following the proposal acceptance. Continuing Disclosure: Subject to certain exemptions, issues in an aggregate amount over $1,000,000 may be required to comply with provisions of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 which require that issuers of municipal securities enter into agreements for the benefit of the owners of the securities to provide continuing disclosure with respect to the securities. Described in the Official Statement are the conditions under which the Issuer of these obligations is exempt or will comply with the Rule. REPRESENTATIONS No dealer, broker, salesperson or other person has been authorized by the Issuer to give any information or to make any representation other than those contained in the Official Statement and, if given or made, such other information or representations must not be relied upon as having been authorized by the Issuer. This Official Statement is not to be construed as a contract with the underwriter. Statements contained herein which involve estimates or matters of opinion are intended solely as such and are not to be construed as representations of fact. This Official Statement and any addenda thereto were prepared relying on information of the Issuer and other sources and, while believed to he reliable, are not guaranteed as to completeness or accuracy. Bond Counsel has not participated in the preparation of this Official Statement and is not expressing any opinion as to the completeness or accuracy of the information contained therein. Compensation of Ehlers & Associates, Inc., payable entirely by the Issuer, is contingent upon the sale of the issue. CLOSING CERTIFICATES Upon delivery of the Obligations, the purchaser (underwriter) will be furnished with the following items: (1) a certificate of the appropriate Officials to the effect that at the time of the sale of the Obligations and all times subsequent thereto up to and including the time of the delivery of the Obligations, this Official Statement did not and does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements therein, in the light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading; (2) a receipt signed by the appropriate officer evidencing payment for the Obligations; (3) a certificate evidencing the due execution of the Obligations, including statements that (a) no litigation of any nature is pending, or to the knowledge of signers, threatened, restraining or enjoining the issuance and delivery of the Obligations. (b) neither the corporate existence or boundaries of the Issuer nor the title of the signers to their respective offices is being contested, and (c) no authority or proceedings for the issuance of the Obligations have been repealed, revoked or rescinded; and (4) a certificate setting forth facts and expectations of the Issuer which indicates that the Issuer does not expect to use the proceeds of the Obligations in a manner that would cause them to be arbitrage bonds within the meaning of Section 148 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, _ as amended, or within the meaning of applicable Treasury Regulations. ii • o TABLE OF CONTENTS TERMSOF PROPOSAL ......................................................... ............................... I RATING ............................. .... .......... .......... ....... ..... ......... I ... I__ ............. 5 TAXEXEMPTION ............ ....... ................ ............ ... .... ... I ............. I ..... ......... .. 6 QUALIFIED TAX- EXEMPT OBLIGATIONS .................................... ............................... 6 CONTINUINGDISCLOSURE ........... .... .... ....... ......... ..... ......................... I............. 7 RISKFACTORS ........................................................... ............................. .. 7 VALUATIONS .......... .. .. ..... ......................................... ............................... 8 .... MINNESOTA VALUATIONS; PROPERTY TAXES .............................. ............................... 8 CURRENT PROPERTY VALUATIONS .......................................... ............................. 1997198 NET TAX CAPACITY BY CLASSIFICATION ..................... ............................... ..... 10 TRENDOF VALUATIONS ................................................. ......................... . ... .. LARGERTAXPAYERS .................................................... ............................... 10 DEBT ....................................................................... ............................... 11 DIRECT DEBT ................ . .... ..... .......................... I .................... I__ ......... I. 11 . LEASEPURCHASE .............................................. ............................... I........ 11 DEBTLIMIT ............................................................. ............................... 11 SCHEDULE OF BONDED INDEBTEDNESS ................................... ............................... 12 OVERLAPPINGDEBT ................................... ............................... I.......... ...... . 15 FUTUREFINANCING ................................................ ............................... _ - 15 DEBTRATIOS ............................................. ............................... I ..... ...... -' 16 LEVYLIMITS ............................................................ ............................... TAX LEVIES AND COLLECTIONS .................................... ............................... ......... 17 TAXCOLLECTIONS ...................................................... ............................... 17 TAXCAPACITY RATES .......................... ............................... I ............ ..... ....... 17 THEISSUER ................................................................. ............................... 18 CITY GOVERNMENT ............................ ............................... _ ...- ................... 18 EMPLOYEES; PENSIONS ................................................. ............................... 18 ENTERPRISEFUNDS ................................... ............................... I................. 19 INSURANCE...................................................... ............................... I...... 20 LITIGATION................................... ............................... I .... ..................... 20 DEBTPAYMENT HISTORY ................................................ ............................... 20 GENERALINFORMATION ...... ............ ................ ........................................ I......... 21 LOCATION.............................................................. ............................... 21 AREAEMPLOYMENT ................................ ............................... ..... ................ 21 EDUCATION............... _ ............................ _ .............. ............................... 21 U .S. CENSUS DATA ....................................................... ............................... 22 EMPLOYMENT9INFMPLOYMENT DATA .............. .. ............ 22 .... ............................... . BUILDINGPERMITS ...................................................... ............................... 23 BONDYEARS .... .................. .... .................. ............................. .............. I...... 24 EXCERPTS FROM FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ................................... ............................... A -1 FORMOF LEGAL OPINION ................................................... ............................... B -I BOOK -ENTRY -ONLY SYSTEM ................................................ ............................... C -1 iii OFFICERS Tom Wilharber Mayor Theresa Brenner Council Member Sanna Buckbee Council Member Mary Jo Helmbrecht Council Member Laura Powers Council Member James March, City Administrator Ry -Chel Gaustad, City Clerk Danell Westbrock, Deputy Clerk - Treasurer PROFESSIONAL SERVICES Gregory Hellings, City Attorney, Coon Rapids, Minnesota Kennedy & Graven, Chartered, Bond Counsel, Minneapolis, Minnesota Ehlers & Associates, Inc., Financial Advisors, Roseville, Minnesota iv TERMS OF PROPOSAL $720,000* GENERAL OBLIGATION SEWER AND WATER REVENUE BONDS, SERIES 1998 CITY OF CENTERVILLE, MINNESOTA Sealed proposals for the purchase of $720,000* General Obligation Sewer and Water Revenue Bonds, Series 1998 (the "Bonds ") of the City of Centerville, Minnesota (the "City ") will be received at the offices of Ehlers & Associates, Inc., 3060 Centre Pointe Drive, Roseville, Minnesota 55113-1105, until 11:00 A.M., Central Time, on June 10, 1998, when they will be opened, read and tabulated for presentation to the City Council- The proposals will be presented to the City Council for consideration for award at a meeting to be held in the City at 6:00 P.M., Central Time, on the same date. The Bonds will be general obligations of the City for which the City will pledge its full faith, credit and taxing powers. The proposal offering to purchase the Bonds upon the terms specified herein and most favorable to the City will be accepted unless all proposals are rejected. Purpose The Bonds are being issued pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapters 444 and 475, to provide funds for sanitary sewer and water main improvements in the City. Dates and Maturities The Bonds will be dated July 1, 1998 as the date of original issue, will be issued as fully registered Bonds in the denomination of $5,000 each, or any integral multiple thereof, and will mature on February I in the following years and amounts: Year Amount Year Amount 2000 $60,000 2005 $75,000 2001 60,000 2006 75,000 2002 65,000 2007 80,000 2003 65,000 2008 85,000 2004 70,000 2009 85,000 The City reserves the right to increase or decrease the amount of individual maturities on the day of sale, in increments of $5,000 each. Term Bond Option All dates are inclusive. Proposals for the Bonds may contain a maturity schedule providing for any combination of serial bonds and term bonds, subject to mandatory redemption, so long as the amount of principal maturing or subject to mandatory redemption in each year conforms to the maturity schedule set forth above. Interest Payment Dates and Rates Interest will be payable on February 1 and August 1 of each year, commencing February 1, 1999, to the registered owners of the Bonds appearing of record in the bond register as of the close of business on the 15th day (whether or not a business day) of the immediately preceding month. Interest will be computed upon the basis of a 360 -day year 1 r of twelve 30 -day months and will be rounded pursuant to rules of the MSRB. All Bonds of the same maturity must bear interest from date of issue until paid at a single, uniform rate, not exceeding the rate specified for Bonds of any subsequent maturity. Each rate must be expressed in an integral multiple of 5 1100 or 1/8 of 1 %. Optional Redemption At the option of the City, Bonds maturing on or after February 1, 2006 shall be subject to prior payment on February 1, 2005 or any date thereafter, at a price of par and accrued interest. Redemption may be in whole or in part of the Bonds subject to prepayment. If redemption is in part, the selection of the Bonds remaining unpaid to be prepaid shall be at the discretion of the City. If only part of the Bonds having a common maturity date are called for prepayment, the City will notify DTC of the particular amount of such maturity to be prepaid. DTC will determine by lot the amount of each participant's interest in such maturity to be redeemed and each participant will then select by lot the beneficial ownership interest in such maturity to be redeemed. Notice of such call shall be given by mailing a notice thereof by registered or certified mail at least thirty (30) days prior to the date fixed for redemption to the registered owner of each Bond to be redeemed at the address shown on the registration books. Book Entry Format The Bonds will be designated in the name of Cede & Co., as nominee for The Depository Trust Company ( "DTC "), New York, New York. DTC will act as securities depository for the Bonds, and will be responsible for maintaining a book -entry system for recording the interest of its participants and the transfers of interests between its participants. The participants will be responsible for maintaining records regarding the beneficial interests of the individual purchasers of the Bonds. So long as Cede & Co. is the registered owner of the Bonds, all payments of principal and interest will be made to the depository which, in turn, will be obligated to remit such payments to its Participants for subsequent disbursement to the beneficial owners of the Bonds. Paving Agent The City has selected Firstar Bank of Minnesota, N.A., St. Paul, Minnesota, to act as paying agent (the "Paying Agent "). The City will pay the charges for Paying Agent services. The City reserves the right to remove the Paying Agent and to appoint a successor. Delivery Within 40 days after the sale, the Bonds will be delivered without cost to the original purchaser at DTC. On the day of closing, the City will furnish to the purchaser the opinion of bond coynsel hereinafter described, appropriate arbitrage certifications and a certificate verifying that no litigation in any manner questioning the validity of the Bonds is then pending or, to the hest knowledge of officers of the City, threatened. Payment for the Bonds must be received by the City at its designated depository on the date of closing in immediately available funds. Legal Opinion An opinion as to the validity of the Bonds and the exemption from taxation of the interest thereon will be furnished by Kennedy & Graven, Chartered, of Minneapolis, Minnesota, bond counsel to the City, and will accompany the Bonds. The legal opinion will state that the Bonds are valid and binding general obligations of the City enforceable in accordance with their terms, except to the extent to which enforceability may be limited by Minnesota or United States laws relating to bankruptcy, reorganization, moratorium or creditors' rights generally. 2 Type of Proposal Proposals for not less than $711,065 plus accrued interest on the principal sum of $720,000 from date of or ginal issue of the Bonds to date of delivery must be filed with the undersigned prior to the time of safe. Proposals must be submitted to Ehlers & Associates, Inc. either: 1) In a seated envelope to Ehlers & Associates, Inc. as described herein; or 2) A facsimile submission to Ehlers & Associates, Inc., Financial Advisors, Facsimile Number: (612) 697 -8555. Proposals must be submitted to Ehlers & Associates, Inc. as described above and must be received prior to the time established above for the opening of proposals. Each proposal must be unconditional except as to legality. A good faith deposit (the "Deposit ") in the amount of $14,400, or a financial surety bond complying with the provisions below, must be submitted with each proposal. The Deposit must be in the form of a certified or cashiers check or bank draft or a wire transfer of funds to Resource Bank & Trust Company, of Minneapolis, Minnesota, ABA #09 -10- 0550 -6 for further credit to Ehlers & Associates, Inc., Bond Issue Escrow Account #850- 788 -1, Attn: Alicia O'Bannmt, or a financial surety bond. The Deposit will be retained by the City as liquidated damages if the proposal is accepted and the bidder fails to comply therewith. The Deposit will be returned to the Purchaser at the closing for the Bonds. Proposals for the Bonds should be addressed to the undersigned City Clerk. If a financial surety bond is used, it must be from an insurance company licensed to issue such a bond in the State of Minnesota, and preapproved by the City. Such bond must be submitted to Ehlers & Associates, Inc. prior to the opening of the proposals. Such bond must identify each bidder whose deposit is guaranteed by such financial surety bond. If the Bonds are awarded to a bidder using a financial surety bond, then that purchaser is required to submit its Deposit to Ehlers & Associates, Inc. in the form of a certified or cashier's check or wire transfer as instructed by Ehlers & Associates, Inc. not later than 100 P.M., Central Time, on the next business day following the award. If such deposit is not received by that time, the financial surety bond may be drawn by the City to satisfy the deposit requirement. In the event the purchaser fails to comply with the accepted proposal, said amount will be retained by the City. No proposal can be withdrawn after the time set for receiving proposals unless the meeting of the City scheduled for award of the Bonds is adjourned, recessed, or continued to another date without award of the Bonds having been made. Award The Bonds will be awarded to the bidder offering the lowest interest rate to be determined on a true interest cost (TIC) basis. The City's computation of the interest rate of each proposal, in accordance with customary practice, will be controlling. In the event of a tie, the sale of the Bonds will be awarded by lot. No oral proposal will be considered, and the City reserves the right to reject any and all proposals and to waive any informality in any proposal. CUSIP Numbers The City will assume no obligation for the assignment or printing of CUSIP numbers on the Bonds or for the correctness of any numbers printed thereon, but will permit such numbers to be printed at the expense of the purchaser, if the purchaser waives any delay in delivery occasioned thereby. Information From Purchaser The successful purchaser will be required to provide, in a timely manner, certain information relating to the initial offering prices of the Bonds necessary to compute the yield on the Bonds pursuant to the provisions of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. 3 Qualified Tax - Exempt Oblivations The City will designate the Bonds as qualified tax - exempt obligations for purposes of Section 265(6)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. Continuing Disclosure Bidders and other participating underwriters in the primary offering of the Bonds need not comply with paragraph (b)(5) of Rule 15c2 -12 promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Rule "), because the aggregate principal amount of the Bonds and any other securities required to be integrated with the Bonds is less than $1,000,000. Consequently, the Issuer will not enter into any undertaking to provide continuing disclosure of any kind with respect to the Bonds. Official Statement Underwriters may obtain a copy of the Official Statement by request to the City's Financial Advisor prior to the proposal opening. The Syndicate Manager will be provided with 50 copies of the Final Official Statement within seven business days of the proposal acceptance. Additional copies of the Final Official Statement will be available at a cost of $10.00 per copy. Information for bidders and proposal forms may be obtained from the undersigned or from the City's Financial Advisor, Ehlers & Associates, Inc., 3060 Centre Pointe Drive, Roseville, Minnesota 55113 -1105, Telephone (612) 697 -8500. The City reserves the right to reject any and all proposals, and to waive informalities and to adjourn the sale. BY ORDER OF THE CITY COUNCIL Ry -Chel Gaustad City Clerk City Hall 1880 Main Street Centerville, Minnesota 55038 If proposals are delivered to Ehlers & Associates, Inc., the good faith deposit, payable to the City, shall be retained in the offices of Ehlers & Associates, Inc_ with the same effect as if delivered to the City, Alternatively, bidders may wire the good faith deposit to Resource Bank & Trust Company, Minneapolis, Minnesota, A.B.A. #09 -10- 0550 -6 Attention: Alicia O'Bannon for credit to Ehlers & Associates, Inc. Bond Issue Escrow Account, #850- 788 -1. The City and any bidder who chooses to so wire the good faith deposit hereby agree irrevocably that Ehlers & Associates, Inc. shall be the escrow holder of the good faith deposit wired to such account subject only to these conditions and duties: 1) All income earned thereon shall be retained by the escrow holder as payment for its expenses; 2) If the proposal is not accepted, Ehlers & Associates, Inc. shall, at its expense, promptly return the good faith deposit amount to the losing bidder; 3) If the proposal is accepted, the good faith deposit shall be returned to the purchaser at the closing; 4) Ehlers • Associates, Inc. shall bear all costs of maintaining the escrow account and returning the funds to the bidder; 5) Ehlers • Associates, Inc. shall not be an insurer of the good faith deposit amount and shall have no liability hereunder except if it willfully fails to perform, or recklessly disregards, its duties specified herein; and 6) FDIC insurance on deposits within the escrow account shall be limited to $100,000 per bidder. 4 INTRODUCTION $720,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION SEWER AND WATER REVENUE BONDS, SERIES 1998 The .$710,000 General Obligation Sewer and Water Revenue Bonds, Series 1998 (the "Bonds "), are being issued pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapters 444 and 475, to finance construction of sanitary sewer and watermain improvements on 20th Avenue North in the City. Capitalization has been estimated as follows: Construction, contingency, engineering and overhead Sanitary Sewer $374,530 Watermain 302,150 Issuance costs 15,000 Capitalized interest, est. 19,385 Funds needed $711,065 Plus allowance for discount bidding (an interest cost) 8.935 Bond Issue 1720,O Principal and interest will be paid from special assessments against properties specially benefitted from the improvement and from revenues of the sewer and water systems. The Bonds are general obligations of the City for which its full faith, credit and taxing powers are pledged without limit as to rate or amount. RATING General obligation debt of the City of Centerville is non- rated. The City has not requested a rating on this issue- 5 TAX EXEMPTION In the opinion of Bond Counsel, under existing statutes, regulations rulings and decisions, interest on the Bonds is not includible in the "gross income" of the owners thereof for purposes of federal income taxation and is not includable in taxable net income of individuals, estates or trusts for purposes of State of Minnesota income taxation, but is subject to State of Minnesota franchise taxes measured by income that are imposed upon corporations, including financial institutions. Noncompliance following the issuance of the Bonds with certain requirements of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, (the "Code ") and covenants of the bond resolution may result in the inclusion of interest on the Bonds in gross income (for federal tax purposes) and taxable net income (for State of Minnesota tax purposes) of the owners thereof. No provision has been made for redemption of the Bonds, or for an increase in the interest rate on the Bonds, in the event that interest on the Bonds becomes subject to United States or State of Minnesota income taxation. The Code imposes an alternative minimum tax with respect to individuals and corporations on alternative minimum taxable income. Interest on the Bonds will not be treated as a preference item in calculating alternative minimum taxable income. The Code provides, however, that for taxable years beginning after 1989, a portion of the adjusted current earnings of a corporation not otherwise included in the minimum tax base would be included for purposes of calculating the alternative minimum tax that may be imposed with respect to corporations. Adjusted current earnings include income received that is otherwise exempt from taxation such as interest on the Bonds. The Code provides that in the case of an insurance company subject to the tax imposed by Section 831 of the Code, for taxable years beginning after December 31, 1986 the amount which otherwise would be taken into account as "losses incurred" under Section 832(6)(5) shall be reduced by an amount equal to 15% of the interest on the Bonds that is received or accrued during the taxable year. Interest on the Bonds may be included in the income of a foreign corporation for purposes of the branch profits tax imposed by Section 884 of the Code. Under certain circumstances, interest on the Bonds may be subject to the tax on ., excess net passive income' of Subchapter S corporations imposed by Section 1375 of the Code. The above is not a comprehensive list of all Federal tax consequences which may arise from he receipt of interest on the Bonds. The receipt of interest on the Bonds may otherwise affect the Federal or State income tax liability of the recipient based on the particular taxes to which the recipient is subject and the particular tax status of other items or deductions. Bond Counsel expresses no opinion regarding any such consequences. All prospective purchasers of the Bonds are advised to consult their own tax advisors as to the tax consequences of, or tax considerations for, purchasing or holding the Bonds. QUALIFIED TAX- EXEMPT OBLIGATIONS Prior to the adoption of the Code, financial institutions were generally permitted to deduct 80% of their interest expenses allocable to tax - exempt bonds . Under the Code, however, financial institutions are generally not entitled to such a deduction for tax - exempt bonds purchased after August 7, 1986. However, the City will designate the Bonds of this issue as qualified tax- exempt obligations pursuant to section 265(b)(3) of the Code which would permit financial institutions to deduct interest expenses allocable to the Bonds to the extent permitted under prior law. 6 CONTINUING DISCLOSURE Participating underwriters in the primary offering of the Bonds need not comply with paragraph (b)(5) of Rule 15c2 -12 promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, because the aggregate principal amount of the Bonds and any other securities required to be integrated with the Bonds is less than $1,000,000. Consequently, the Issuer will not enter into any undertaking to provide continuing disclosure of any kind with respect to the Bonds. RISK FACTORS Following is a description of possible risks to holders of these Bonds without weighing as to probability. This description of risks is not intended to be all - inclusive and there may be other risks not now perceived or listed here. Taxes: The Bonds of this offering are general obligations of the City, the ultimate payment of which rests in the City's ability to levy and collect sufficient taxes to pay debt service should other revenue (special assessments and revenues) be insufficient. Interest Rates: In the future, interest rates for this type of obligation may rise generally, possibly resulting in a reduction in the value of the obligations for resale prior to maturity. Tax Exemption: If the federal government or the State of Minnesota taxes the interest on municipal obligations directly or indirectly, the value of the Bonds may fall for purposes of resale. Noncompliance following the issuance of the Bonds with certain requirements of the Code and covenants of the bond resolution may result in the inclusion of interest on the Bonds in gross income of the recipient for United States or in taxable net income of individuals, estates or trusts for State of Minnesota income tax purposes. No provision has been made for redemption of the Bonds, or for an increase in the interest rate on the Bonds, in the event that interest on the Bonds becomes subject to United States or State of Minnesota income taxation, retroactive to the date of issuance. The 1995 Minnesota Legislature has enacted a statement of intent that interest on obligations of Minnesota governmental units and Indian tribes be included in net income of individuals, estates and trusts for Minnesota income tax purposes if a court determines that Minnesota's exemption of such interest unlawfully discriminates against interstate commerce because interest on obligations of governmental issuers located in other states is so included. This provision applies to taxable years that begin during or after the calendar year in which any such court decision becomes final, irrespective of the date on which the obligations were issued. The Issuer is not aware of any judicial decision holding that a state's exemption of interest on its own bonds or those of its political subdivisions or Indian tribes, but not of interest on the bonds of other states or their political subdivisions or Indian tribes, unlawfully discriminates against interstate commerce or otherwise contravenes the United States Constitution. Nevertheless, the Issuer cannot predict the likelihood that interest on the Bonds would become taxable under this Minnesota statutory provision. State Economy; Local Government Aids: State cash flow problems could affect local governments and possibly increase property taxes. Book- Entry -Only System: The timely credit of payments for principal and interest on the Bonds to the accounts of the Beneficial Owners of the Bonds may be delayed due to the customary practices, standing instructions or for other unknown reasons by DTC participants or indirect participants. Since the notice of redemption or other notices to holders of these obligations will be delivered by the City to DTC only, there may be a delay or failure by DTC, DTC participants or indirect participants to notify the Beneficial Owners of the Bonds. Economy: The economy of the City consists of light industry and commerce, and agriculturally related businesses. A combination of economic, climatic, political or civil disruptions could affect the local economy and result in reduced tax collections and /or increased demands upon local government. 7 VALUATIONS MINNESOTA VALUATIONS; PROPERTY TAXES All non - exempt property is subject to taxation by local taxing districts. The total tax rate is determined by dividing each taxing district's dollar levy (budget less aids and revenues) by its total tax capacity. Exempt real property includes Indian lands, public property, and educational, religious and charitable institutions. Most personal property is exempt from taxation (except investor -owned utility mains, generating plants, etc.). At least one- fourth of all real properties are appraised yearly by local or county assessors who are directed by statute to appraise each parcel according to its estimated market value (EMV). The assessors classify all property subject to the general property tax and apply statutory percentages to the EMV to determine the tax capacity upon which tax capacity rates are computed. Significant major classifications and the percentages by which tax capacity is determined are: Tvpe of Propertv 1996/97 1997198 1998199 Residential homestead' First $72,000 - 1.0% First $75,000 - Lo %a First $75,000 - 1.0% Over $72,000 - 2.0% Over $75,000 - 1.85% Over $75,000 - 1,70% Agricultural homestead' First $72,000 HGA' - LO% First $75,000 HGA - 1.0% First $75,000 HGA - 1.0% Over $72.000 HGA - 2.0% Over $75,000 HGA - 1.85% Over $75,000 HGA - 1.70% Land to 320A - 45 %n - 1.0 %n Land to 320A - .4% - 0.9 % Land to 320A ­35% - 0.8% Land excess - 1.50% Land excess - 1.40% Land excess - 1.25% Agricultural non - homestead Land - 1.50 % Land - 1.40% Land - 1.25% Seasonal recreational residential First $72,000 - 1.75% First $75,000 - 1.4% First $75,000 - 1.25% Over $72,000 - 15% Over $75,000 - 2.5% Over $75,000 - 22% Residential non - homestead: I -3 units 2.3% 1 unit - First $75,000 - 1.9% 1 unit - First $75,000 - 1.25% 4 or more 3.4% Over $75,000 - 2.1% Over $75,000 - 1.70% Selected small cities with 4 or 2 -3 units - 2.1% 2 -3 units - 1.70 % more units' 2.3% 2.3% 2.15% Industrial /commercial First $100,000 - 3.0 %n First $150,000 - 2.77o First $150,000 - 2.45% Excess - 4.60% Excess - 4.00% Excess - 3.50% Utility' 4,60% 4,00% 3.50% A residential property qualifies as "homestead" if it is occupied by the owner or a relative of the owner on the assessment date. House /garage /1 acre. ' Cities of 5,000 population or less and located entirely outside the seven- county metropolitan area and the adjacent nine - county area and whose boundaries are 15 miles or more from the boundaries of a Minnesota city with a Population over 5,000. ' The estimated market value of utility property is determined by the Minnesota Department of Revenue. 8 CURRENT PROPERTY VALUATIONS Estimated Full Value of Taxable Property, 1997/98 594.493.1 13 ' 1997/98 Assessors 1997/98 Taxable Net Tax Market Value Ca aci Real Estate $84,741,200 $1,172,897 Personal Property 1.165,800 44,682 Total Valuation $85,907,000 $1,217,579 Less: Captured Tax Increment Tax Capacity'' - 17,739 Fiscal Disparities Contribution' - 61,363 Taxable Net Tax Capacity $1,138,477 Plus: Fiscal Disparities Distribution 264,897 Adjusted Taxable Net Tax Capacity $1.403,374 According to the Minnesota Department of Revenue, the Assessor's Taxable Market Value ( "ATMV ") for the City of Centerville is about 90.8`!% of the actual selling prices of property most recently sold in the City. That sales ratio was calculated by comparing the selling prices with the Assessors Taxable Market Value. Dividing the Assessor's Taxable Market Value of real estate by 0.908 and adding personal property and mobile home ATMV, if any, results in an "Estimated Full Value of Taxable Property" for the City of $94,493,113. - The $17,739 tax increment value shown above represents the captured net tax capacity of tax increment financing districts located in the City of Centerville. Taxes collected on property in the tax increment districts accrue to the City to pay debt service on outstanding tax increment bonds and/or to reimburse eligible development expenses, 3 Each community in the seven - county metropolitan area contributes 40% of its new industrial and commercial valuation to an area pool which is then distributed among the municipalities on the basis of population, special needs, etc. Each governmental unit makes a contribution and receives a distribution -- sometimes gaining and sometimes losing net tax capacity for tax purposes. Taxes are spread on the basis of taxable net tax capacity. 9 1997/98 NET TAX CAPACITY BY CLASSIFICATION 1997198 Percent of Total Net Tax Capacity Net Tax Capacity Residential $ 952,647 78.24% Agricultural 6,626 0.54% Commercial /industrial 132,952 10.92% Non - homestead residential 80,672 6.63% Personal property 44,682 3.67% Total $1,217,579 100.00% TREND OF VALUATIONS Adjusted Assessor's Taxable Levy Taxable Net Tax Net Tax Year Market Value Capacity' Capacity' 1993194 $59,975,100 $ 842,423 $ 908,734 1994/95 63,533,900 895,079 919,342 1995/96 70,702,000 1,023,457 1,040,532 1996197 77,429,200 1,151,435 1,274,916 1997/98 85,907,000 1,217,579 1,403,374 LARGER TAXPAYERS 1997/98 1997/98 Assessor's Taxable Net Tax Taxpayer Type of Property Market Value Capacity Northern States Power Utility $740,700 $29,628 Northern Forest Products Commercial /industrial 590,400 20,851 Individual Commercial /industrial 441,400 15,706 Magill Properties Commercial /industrial 398,800 14,002 Minnegasco Inc. Utility 297,400 11,896 Rehbem Inc. Commercial /industrial 419,400 11,766 Individual Commercial /industrial 333,900 11,406 Individual Commercial /industrial 198,700 5,998 James Refrigeration Co. Commercial /industrial 178,700 5,198 Lake Area Utility Cont. Commercial /industrial 181,300 4,954 Source: Current Property Valuations, Net Tax Capacity by Classification, Trend of Valuations and Larger Taxpayers have been furnished by Anoka County. Net tax capacity is before fiscal disparities adjustments and includes tax increment values. Taxable net tax capacity is after fiscal disparities adjustments and does not include tax increment values. 10 DEBT DIRECT DEBT Long -Term General Obligation Debt (See schedules following) Total g.o. debt being paid from special assessments and taxes $ 895,000 Total g.o. debt being paid from revenues and special assessments (includes this issue) 1,130,000 Total g.o. debt being paid from senior housing revenues and taxes 1,290,000 Total Long -Term General Obligation Debt $3,315,000 LEASE PURCHASE The City entered into a Lease Purchase Agreement, dated September 16, 1992, with Norwest Investment Services for $500,000 to finance the construction of a new City Hall and Fire Hall building. Payments are by annual appropriation over 10 years and taxing powers are not pledged. DEBT LIMIT The statutory limit on debt of Minnesota municipalities other than school districts or cities of the first class (Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.53, subd. 1) is 2% of the Assessor's Taxable Market Value of all taxable property within its boundaries. 'Net debt" (Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.51, subd. 4) is the amount remaining after deducting from gross debt: (1) obligations payable wholly or partly from special assessments levied against benefitted property; (2) warrants or orders having no definite or fixed maturity; (3) obligations issued to finance any public revenue producing convenience (i.e. the Bonds of this offering); (4) obligations issued to create or maintain a permanent improvement revolving fund; (5) funds held as sinking funds for payment of principal and interest on debt other than those deductible under 1 -4 above; (6) other obligations which are not to be included in computing the net debt of a municipality under the provisions of the law authorizing their issuance. Assessor's Taxable Market Value $ 85,907,000 Multiply by 2% 0.02 Statutory Bonded Debt Limit $ 1,718.140 Less: Lon Debt Outstanding Being Paid Solely from Taxes -0 Unused Debt Limit $ 1.718.140 11 CITY OF CENTERVILLE, MINNESOTA Schedule of bonded Indebtedness G.O. Debt Being Paid From Special Assessments and Taxes (as of 6/01/98) Improvement Improvement Improvement Improvement & Refunding 1) Dated 6179 7/67 6193 11/1/96 Amoum $215,000 $615.000 $600.030 4605,000 Maturity 411 211 211 211 Rate 6.30% 1999 -00 7.00% 1999 4.25% 1999 4.15% 1999 Rate 7,10% 2000 4.30% 2000 Rate 7.20% 2001 4.40% 20D1 Hate 7.30% 2002 4.50% 2002 Rate 7.40% 2003 Rate TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL PRINCIPAL YEAR Principal Interest Principal Interest Principal Interest Principal Interest PRINCIPAL INTEREST P & I OUTSTANDING %PAID YEAR 1998 0 945 0 9424 0 8,025 0 10,749 0 29,143 29,143 895.000 000% 1998 1999 15,000 1,418 45,000 15,720 130,000 2,763 115,000 19,111 305,000 39,012 344,012 590,000 34.08% 1999 2000 15,000 473 45000 12,548 125.000 14.036 165,030 27,059 212,059 405.000 54,75% 2000 2001 50,000 9,150 125.000 8.600 175,D00 17,750 192,750 230.000 74.30% 2001 2002 50,000 5,525 130,000 2.925 18D.00D 8,450 185.450 50,000 94.41% 2002 N 2001 50,000 1,850 50,000 1,850 51,850 0 100.00% 2003 30.000 2.836 240,000 54,217 130,000 10 ,788 495.000 55.423 895.000 123,264 1,018,264 1) A potion of this issue retuned the 1998 through 20D2 maturities 01 the $360.000 O.O. ImprOVem¢nt Bonds. Series 19918, dated August 1, 1991. Prepared by Ehlers & Associates, Inc. 05/29/98 CRASSMTX,WK4 CITY OF CENTERVILLE, MINNESOTA Schedule of Bonded Indebtedness G.O. Debt Being Paid From Revenues and Special Assessments (as of 6/01/98) Water Revenue This Issue 1) Dated 8/1/96 711/98 Amount $410,000 $720,000 Maturity 211 211 Rate 4.95% 1999 4.75% 2000 -09 Rate 5.05% 2000 -02 Rate 5.10% 2003 -05 Rate 5.20% 2006 Rate 5.30% 2007 Rate 5.48% 2008 TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL PRINCIPAL YEAR Principal Interest Principal Interest P INCIPAL INTEREST P &1 OUTSTANDING %PAID YEAR w 1998 0 10,553 0 0 0 10,553 10,553 1,130,000 0.00% 1998 1999 30,000 20,363 0 37,050 30,000 57,413 87,413 1,100,000 2.65% 1999 2000 35,000 18,736 60,000 32,775 95,000 51,511 146,511 1,005,000 11.06% 2000 2001 35,000 18,969 60,000 29,925 95,000 46,894 141,894 910,000 19.47% 2001 2002 40,000 15,075 65,000 26,956 105,000 42,031 147,031 805,000 28.76% 2002 2003 40,000 13,045 65,000 23,869 105,000 36,914 141,914 700,000 38.05% 2003 2004 40,000 11,005 70,000 20,663 110,000 31,668 141,668 590,000 47.79% 2004 2005 45,000 8,838 75,000 17,219 120,000 26,057 146,057 470,000 58.41% 2005 2006 45,000 6,520 75,000 13,656 120,000 20,176 140,176 350,000 69.03% 2005 2007 50,000 4,025 80,000 9,975 130,000 14,000 144,000 220,000 80.53% 2007 2008 50,000 1,350 85,000 6,056 135,000 7,406 142,406 85,000 92.48% 2008 2009 85,000 2.019 85,000 2,019 87,019 0 100.00% 2009 410,000 126,479 720,000 220,163 1,130,000 346,542 1,476,642 1) Interest on this issue is estimated at 4.75 %. Prepared by Ehlers 8 Associates, Inc. 05/29/98 CRREV.W K4 CITY OF CENTERVILLE, MINNESOTA (ANOKA COUNTY HRA) Schedule of Bonded Indebtedn0ss General Obligation Debt Being Paid From Senior Housing Revenues & Taxes (05 of finilm) Senior Housing baled IN0197 Amount $1,290,000 Maturity 2101 Rate 4.25% 2001) Rate 4.35% 2001 Rate 4.45% 2002 Rate 4.55% 2003 Rare 4E5% 2004 Role 475% 2005 Rate 4.05% 2006 Rate 4.95% 2007 Rate 5.05% 2000 Rate 5.15%• 2009 Role 5256 2010 Rata 5.30%. 2011 Rate 5.35% 2012 Rate 5.65% 2013 -2020 Rate 575% 2021-2027 TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL PRINCIPAL 4. YEAR Principal Interest PRINCIPAL IWEREST Pal OUTSTANDING %PAID YEAR 1998 0 59,273 0 59,273 59.273 1,290,D00 000% 1998 1999 0 71,126 0 71,128 71.128 1'9W000 0.00% 1999 2000 15,000 70.009 15.000 70,809 05,809 1275,000 1.16% 2000 2001 151000 70,164 15,000 70,164 05,164 1'260000 2.33% 2001 2002 15.000 69.504 15,000 69,504 04,504 I.M.000 3.49% 2002 2003 20.000 68.715 20.000 68,715 00,715 1,225,000 5.04% 2003 2004 20.000 67.795 20.000 67,795 07,795 1,2051000 6,59% 2004 2005 25.000 66.736 25.000 66,736 91,736 118%933 ISM 2005 2006 25.000 65,536 25,000 65,536 90,536 1.1 Word 10.47% 2006 2007 25.000 64.311 25.000 64,311 09,311 1,130.000 1240% 2007 2008 30.000 62,935 30.000 62.935 92,935 1,100.000 14.73. 2006 2009 30,000 61,405 30.000 61.05 91405 1,070.000 9956 2009 2010 35,000 59,714 35.000 59,714 94.714 1,035.000 19.77% 2010 2011 354000 57.068 35.000 57,068 92.860 1,000,000 2248% 2011 2012 40.000 55.070 40,000 55.870 95.870 960,000 25.58% 2012 2013 40.OW 53,670 40,000 53,670 93 920,000 28.68% 2013 2014 40.000 51.10 40.000 51,410 91,410 000.000 3178% 2014 2015 45.000 49,009 45,000 49.009 94,009 035,000 3527% 2015 2016 45.000 46.66 45.000 46.466 91,466 790,000 3076% 2016 2017 50.000 43]03 50.000 43 .783 93,783 740,000 42,64% 2017 2018 55.000 40,016 55.000 40.816 95,016 685,000 46.90% 2019 2019 60.000 37,560 60.000 37,560 97,568 625.000 51.55% 2019 2020 65.000 34,036 65.000 34.036 99,036 560.000 56.59% 2020 2021 65.000 30,331 65 we 30,331 95.331 495.000 61.636 2021 2022 70.000 26,450 70000 26,450 96,450 425.000 67.05. 2022 2023 75,000 22.281 75.000 22,281 97.281 350.000 7287% 2023 2024 More 17,825 80,000 17,825 97,825 270,000 79.07% 2024 2025 05.000 13.001 85000 13,081 98,081 185,000 85.66% 2025 2026 90.000 8.D50 90,000 R.M 98,050 95.000 92.64% 2026 2027 95,000 2 ,731 95.000 2,731 97,731 0 100.00% 2027 1,290,000 1449.270 1,290.000 1449,270 2,739.270 Prepared by Ehlers 8 Associates, Inc. 0512998 SNIORHOU.W K4 MEMO DATE : June 5, 1998 TO Honorable Mayor and Council FROM Jim March RE Appearance of Bill Bisek tt* �* * trx*** rr ,t *xt,r *ttt,ttt,r,t,r *t,ttt *x* rat *t +t:t�t:r * *:r�� *t+r *,t *,rte * *�* Bill Bisek will be present to discuss his plans for a "Customer Appreciation Day" scheduled for October 10, 1998. Mr. Bisek would like to secure a noise permit for this event. This event was held in a tent on his property on October 18, 1997 last year. The event includes a hog roast and performance from the "Rockin Hollywoods ". The event ran from 4:00 PM until 10:00 PM last year. Mr. Bisek has requested permission to allow this event to run from 4:00 PM until 12 :00 PM this year. Last year a letter was sent by the owner to the surrounding property owners informing them of the event and granting them free admission to the event. I do not recall receiving any complaints on this issue last year. �dv! A CITY OF CENTERVILLE SPECIAL MEETING WEDNESDAY, MAY 20, 1998 Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, the City Council of the City of Centerville held a special meeting on Wednesday, May 20, 1998 at City Hall, 1880 Main Street. PRESENT: Acting Mayor Mary Jo Helmbrecht Council Members: Theresa Brenner Laura Powers ABSENT: Mayor Tom Wilharber Councilmember Sanna Buckbee STAFF: Administrator Jim March City Clerk Ry -Chel Gaustad Public Works Director /Building Official Paul Palzer Engineering Proposals The Council considered engineering proposals from the firms of Bolton & Menk, Inc., Howard R. Green Company, Bonestroo Rosene Anderlik & Associates, BRW, McCombs Frank Roos Associates, Inc., Hakanson Anderson Assoc., Inc., and RLK - Kuusisto, Ltd. Mr. March briefed the Council on the proposals received and made recommendation on behalf of himself and Mr. Palzer. Furthermore, the four firms that ranked highest on their list are Bonestroo Rosene Anderlik & Associates, BRW, Howard R. Green Company and Bolton & Menk, Inc. Mayor Wilharber made written comments about the firms which ranked highest on his list. The Council was in consensus of the Staffs findings. After reviewing the proposals, Mr. March recognized there are several different billing methods. In addition, the proposals sparked many good ideas. Mr. March elaborated on a few of the ideas. Some firms offer an open house to show plans to residents. Also, some engineering firms execute a newsletter to the citizens with updates on city projects. Mr. March was interested to learn about the training and certificates received by the engineering firm employees. In addition, the key personnel assigned to Centerville, the years of experience and education. Another interesting note is one firm offered a `Hotline" for citizens to call with questions, where as another firm conducts monthly brainstorm sessions with staff and senior engineers. Councilmember Helmbrecht suggested a format and forms to use 4 during the interview process. Ms. Gaustad mentioned the Council may consider requesting another engineer to sit through the interviews, either an engineer from another community or another firm. Councilmember Powers inquired about ranking each firms cost for work rendered. Mr. Palzer commented the costs are difficult to consider because of the type and number of employees needed on each project. Councilmember Helmbrecht requested Staff develop an interview format for the selected firms. Mr. March suggested notifying the final engineering firms, three to four weeks in advance,to allow them time to prepare for the interview. The Council suggested establishing a workshop date to discuss how the city plans to proceed with the interviews. Mr. Palzer suggested touring the firms and meeting the engineering staff. Councilmember Brenner moved and it was seconded to interview H.R. Green Bonestroo Bolton & Menk and BRW Motion carried i7nanimously, Councilmember Powers suggested sample work products and perhaps questions regarding their experience on specific projects. Councilmember Brenner requested a time line for the events. Mr. March outlined the chain of events; first to tour engineering facilities, second hold a workshop to review the format and forms for the interview and finally, conduct the interviews. Mr. Palzer suggested performing background checks on the firms from other communities. Councilmember Helmbrecht questioned the Council if a subcommittee should be created. Mr. March replied Staff can inform the Council of the date and time of the tours and hopefully everyone will be able to attend. Ms. Gaustad noted the meeting should be posted if three or more Council members plan to 'tour the engineering facilities. The Council and Staff discussed scheduling a workshop, tours and interviews. Mr. Palzer stated he will be on vacation from June 27, until July 27th. The Council preferred to schedule the interviews after Mr. Palzers' return. The Council discussed interviewing two nights and allowing each firm, twenty minutes for introductions and the remaining time to answer questions and respond to scenarios. Councilmember Helmbrecht asked if a new firm is selected will H.R. Green complete projects in progress. Mr. March felt it is a good rule of thumb, to allow H.R. Green to complete current projects for liability reasons. 2 Ms. Gaustad questioned the possibility of the City exploring the option of hiring a staff engineer. Mr. March replied with the cost and support staff needs it would be cost prohibitive. Mr. Palzer suggested perhaps Mr. Dean Johnson of Resource Strategies would consider sitting through the interview process. Ms. Gaustad noted the Vice President of an engineering firm stated he would be willing to sit through the interview process at no cost to the city. Councilmember Powers requested Staff investigate the Dean Johnson idea. The Council elected to schedule a workshop on June 15, 1998, 5:00 p.m., and to schedule tours the week of June 8, and interviews the first part of August. Councilmember Powers commented she is available Thursdays in June. Mr. March planned to schedule the tours for June 11, 1998, Dress Code Mr. March explained the office staff requested an amendment to the dress code. The request is to allow for "casual day" and /or colored jeans. The Council discussed the professional appearance of the Staff. Also, that the current policy had only been in effect for two months and they did not want to show favoritism toward the office staff over the other employees. Mr. Palzer said that the public works employees regularly wear jeans. Ms. Gaustad suggested Fridays for "casual day." The Council clarified the dress policy no tattered, worn jeans with holes and only colored jeans on "casual day." Councilmember Brenner moved and it was seconded to amend the dress code policy to allow casual day and color jeans exclusively on Fridays Motion carried unanimously. Equipment Mr. March pointed out the need for an additional vehicle for public works' department. Councilmember Powers asked what is the current public works' vehicle situation. Mr. Palzer replied the red Ford truck, the white Dodge truck and the green Ford truck. However, the City has four public works' employees with transportation needs. Currently, one person needs to use their personal vehicle for work. Furthermore, does the City want to supply the staff with the equipment to do their jobs. Often, two public works' employees need to car pool. Mr. Palzer also said the `97 green truck will need to be replaced next year. This is in hopes to have a very dependable vehicle with minimal maintenance expense. Therefore, Mr. Palzer requested authorization to use $5000 for a newer vehicle to supply the 3 needs of public works. Councilmember Helmbrecht moved and it was seconded to approve an additional vehicle for the public works department at an apnroxirmate cost of $5000 Motion carried unanimously. Staffina Mr. March described office staffing needs due to an increase in business. Mr. March also distributed the 1998 budget narrative and explained the budgeted savings year to date. Moreover, Centerville budgeted $141,347.00 for office personnel salaries. Mr. March continued, with the projected figures the City has spent 32% of the budgeted allocation for administrative personnel. However, if the city is on target with the budget this fia_ure should be at 38 %. Therefore, this has resulted in a year to date savings of $8480. Mr. March presented and explained several staffing scenarios: A. Hire an additional part -time receptionist B. Hire a full -time receptionist C. Hire an intern for the summer D. Expand the duties of the Deputy Clerk E. Expand the duties of the Recycling Coordinator F. Create a new position Councilmember Brenner questioned Mr. March if the salary cost savings took into consideration the wage increases relating to the adoption of the City's comprehensive salary plan. Mr. March explained there has been an overage in the administrative personnel budget which accounts for the salary cost savings. Furthermore, the 32% takes in to consideration the 1998 wage increases. Mr. March explained the results of a one week logging from Staff which included servicing the window, calls received, calls returned and calls retrieved off the answering machine. In essence, thirty calls were taken from the answering machine and it is hoped the City will provide better customer service. Mr. March explained each option concerning filling the administrative staffing needs. Mr. March observed the need to hire a part -time receptionist and commented the new position could be worked out with the current receptionist position as a job share position. This option provides more flexibility for all office staff. Moreover, option B - hire a full -time receptionist does not 4 Moreover, option B - hire a full -time receptionist does not appear to be a viable solution. Again, option C - hiring an intern for the summer will assist the City with future projects. Mr. March added, this fall the City will need to look at the garbage and union contracts. In addition, an intern would be an extra employee to help with the phones and this will be an inexpensive option for the City. The City would pay a minimal salary, but would not be required to pay for benefits. Mr. March noted, an intern position affords the opportunity for a person to gain valuable experience and knowledge. Councilmember Brenner questioned Mr. March if he had adequate time to ensure the intern would gain valuable experience and knowledge. Mr. March assured the Council, the time will be available to properly train and instruct an intern. Mr. March advocated option D, expanding the duties of the Deputy Clerk. In consideration of the City's accumulation of funds which are in excess of three million dollars, there is a need for more in house financial observation. Mr. March identified the primary problem is the need to increase financial investment activity. Furthermore, the Deputy Clerk currently works less than forty hours a week and she has agreed to work more hours to achieve the City's financial goal. Mr. March commented the additional responsibilities may cause an increase in the Deputy Clerks job grade. Councilmember Powers asked if this staffing option will increase the salary of the position. Mr. March responded a correlation between the additional responsibilities and grading points would be investigated. Councilmember Powers questioned Mr. March how option D will support the incoming phone calls and service needs of the City. Also, Councilmember Powers warned, the City may want to consider consulting a professional to comment on the investment of funds and perhaps work for the City in that capacity. Ms. Gaustad questioned Mr. March who currently performs the financial investments for the City. Mr. March replied, to date the financial investments are handled by himself and the Deputy Clerk. Mr. Palzer commented the City may want to consider utilizing a financial consultant to advise the Deputy Clerk in setting up a ladder investment strategies. Mr. March planned to develop an investment policy and bring the proposal to the Council for consideration. Councilmember Powers commented it is difficult to make an educated decision with the limited information provided on option D. Mr. March continued by explaining option E which is to expand the duties of the Recycling Coordinator. Mr. March added recycling 5 SCORE funds are available for reimbursement up to 25 hours a week. Moreover, the Council may want to consider a position that would maximize the City's recycling efforts and accommodate the City's parks. There is a need to have an employee cover the Park and Recreation meetings, do minutes and help develop the park programming. Mr. March suggested option F would be to create a new position. Councilmember Brenner stated for immediate office support, perhaps a part -time receptionist would fulfill the need. Mr. March felt a part -time receptionist, an intern and expanding the duties of the Deputy Clerk would serve the administration personnel needs. Councilmember Powers consented to a part -time receptionist and an intern. However, Councilmember Powers hesitated to authorize expanding the duties of the Deputy Clerk without further information. Councilmember Helmbrecht felt comfortable with Mr. March's recommendations. Mr. March commented one way to satisfy the current employee needs is to increase the Deputy Clerk's responsibility and increase that grade. Mr. Palzer noted he observed several disruptions in the front office because of servicing the window or answering the phones. Therefore, he suggested voice mail boxes in the office. Mr. March commented the City should maximize technology. Ms. Gaustad mentioned recently she researched the cost associated with the voice mail box and this may be a viable solution. Councilmember Brenner questioned Mr. March as to what will the grade increase be for option D with the increase of responsibilities. Councilmember Brenner felt okay with option D. Councilmember Helmbrecht requested Mr. March's recommendation. Mr. March suggested to eliminate staffing options B, and F, and to implement options A, C, D and E. Councilmember Powers requested to have Staff examine professional financial services and its advantages and disadvantages, prior to implementing staffing option D. Councilmember Powers requested Staff place in writing, how the City plans to put monies to',work for the City and how to eliminate current or potential problems. Councilmember Powers moved and it was seconded to authorize Staff to hire a part -time receptionist and an intern Motion carried unanimously. Councilmember Helmbrecht moved and it was seconded to authorize Mr. March to explore option D to expand the Deputy Clerks lob 6 description investigate a financial policy and present other options Helmbrecht aye Brenner aye, Powers nay. Motion carried Councilmember Brenner moved and it was seconded to adjourn the special meeting of May 20, 1998. Motion carried unanimously. The special meeting of May 20, 1998 adjourned at 8 :00 p.m. Respectfully Submitted, Ry -Chel Gaustad, CMC City Clerk 7 r CITY OF CENTERVILLE NOT CITY COUNCIL MEETING WEDNESDAY, MAY 27, 1998 Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, the City Council of the City of Centerville held its regularly scheduled Council meeting on Wednesday, May 27, 1998, at City Hall, 1880 Main Street. PRESENT: Mayor Tom Wilharber Council Members: Theresa Brenner Mary Jo Helmbrecht Sanna Buckbee ABSENT: Councilmember Laura Powers STAFF /CONSULTANTS: Jim March, City Administrator Ry -Chel Gaustad, City Clerk Paul Palzer, Public Works Director/Building Official Phil Bergem, H.R. Green Consulting Engineers Greg Hellings, City Attorney CALL TO ORDER Mayor Wilharber called the Council meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. PUBLIC HEARING APPEARANCES NSP Gas Franchise Mr. Hellings gave an overview of Northern States Power Company's (NSP) request for a gas franchise. Furthermore, in order for a public utility to utilize a public right -of -way, there must be a franchise agreement between Centerville and NSP. Currently, the City has a franchise agreement with Minnegasco. Mr. Hellings stated NSP's agreement is typical of a public utility contract. However, utility companies usually allocate 3 to 7 percent for franchise fees to Cities. Mr. March commented NSP has requested to provide gas service from east of 35W to the undeveloped industrial area in Centerville. Mr. March added some concerns he had with the contract, if the governing body adopts an ordinance in the future, NSP is exempt. Mr. March noted developers have requested NSP and there is no interest in competing with Minnegasco. However, Mr. March recommended denying the franchise agreement. Mr. Hellings stated if gas line relocation is required within five years the City is responsible for paying the cost. Mr. Palzer explained, east of 20th Avenue is serviced by NSP and west of 20th Avenue is serviced by Minnegasco. However, he sees no benefit in having two gas providers. Mayor Wilharber moved and it was seconded to deny the request from NSP and to contract Minnegasco and inform them of the franchise fees Motion carried unanimously, 1993 Minnesota Magic Midway. Inc Case No S4 -92 -3906 Mr. March explained new developments regarding the status of a 1993 law suit between the City of Centerville and Minnesota Magic Midway, Inc. Mr. March reported the City received a letter from PPI (Private Protection, Inc.) offering to purchase the outstanding judgement for 10 percent of $2,518. In addition, the Sheriffs' Department indicated the rite of execution expires in 180 days. Mr. March questioned Mr. Hellings as to the City's expense to pursue the issue. Mr. Hellings replied about $100. excluding the Sheriffs Department fees. Mayor Wilharber recalled Centerville purchased 250 advanced discounted carnival tickets for $2000. However, Minnesota Magic Midway did not show and there was no carnival. Councilmember Buckbee noted, in the past the city exhausted its efforts in an attempt to recover the fees. Mr. March added there is a voided check for $2000 and several letters in the file regarding the City's efforts to recover the fees. Mayor Wilharber polled the Council members. Councilmember Brenner moved and it was seconded to accept the proposal from PPI Motion carried unanimously. Steve McDonald - Audit Presentation Mr. McDonald (Abdo, Abdo, Eick & Myers) gave a report on the 1997 City audit, the management letter and its findings. (EXHIBIT A) Councilmember Buckbee moved and it was seconded to acknowledge receipt of the annual audit year ending 1997 and requested a summary of the audit be published in the local paper. Motion carried unanimously CONSIDERATION OF MINUTES March 25 1998 Council Meeting Minutes Councilmember Buckbee moved and it was seconded to approve the March 25 1998 Council meeting minutes with corrections Motion carried unanimously. April 22, 1998 Council Meeting Minutes Councilmember Brenner moved and it was seconded to approve the April 22 1998 Council meeting minutes Brenner aye Buckbee aye Wilharber ay7e-, Helmbrecht abstained Motion carried. 2 May 20. 1998 Special Meeting Minutes Mayor Wilharber moved and it was seconded to table the May 20 1998 Special meeting minutes due to the lack of a quorum Motion carried unanimously, PAYMENT OF CLAIMS The City of Centerville May 14 - 27. 1998 Councilmember Helmbrecht moved and it was seconded to approve the receipts and disbursements for May 14 - 27. Motion carried unanimously. Eagle Pass Pay Estimate Councilmember Buckbee moved and it was seconded to accept the engineer's recommendation to approve the Eagle Pass pay estimate for streets and utilities. Motion carried unanimously. SET AGENDA Senior Housing Update Business Appreciation Dinner Garage Sale Days Councilmember Brenner moved and it was seconded to approve the set agenda with changes. Motion carried unanimously. PETITIONS AND COMPLAINTS Reisdorfer - Request for Beer Permit Councilmember Buckbee moved and it was seconded to approve the beer permit for the Reisdorfer family, contingent upon appropriate fees be paid and if they do not use the field the fees will be refunded and the12ark is left in the same condition as found. Motion carried unanimously. Hanna Tilsen - Waive copy Fees Councilmember Buckbee moved and it was seconded to grant a waiver of photo copy fees for summary information instead of the whole Council packet Motion carried unanimously_ UNFINISHED BUSINESS Terminal Transport - Grading Plan Review Mr. Phil Bergem (H.R. Green Consulting Engineering) gave a presentation on Terminal Transport and its proposed grading plan. Furthermore, a revised grading plan was submitted to the city, May 26, 1998 from Paramount Engineering. Mr. Bergem addressed a recommendation letter dated May 22, 1998 from H. R. Green. Also, both engineering firms have been in contact and 3 plan to address the items listed in the recommendation letter. Mr. March explained Terminal Transport was an agenda item since it is a major project, however, no action is needed from the Council. In addition, City Staff plans to address the building concept and proposed grading plan at the Planning and Zoning meeting. Rick Carlson - Parkview Development Mr. March summarized the Parkview progress and discussed the draft Developer's agreement, draft final plat and draft grading plan. In essence, the Developer is looking for preliminary feedback prior to presenting the final plat at the next City Council meeting. Mr. March addressed the draft Developer's agreement. Foremost, the Council received a sod escrow letter, indicating the Developer will be responsible for individual property sod compliance. A concern is that the City has no recourse if the Developer does not comply with the sod/seed Ordinance. Therefore, Mr. March suggested the Developers agreement include a cash deposit of $10,000 for sod escrow with the City. Mr. March commented holding the Developer responsible for sod placement is a superior process compared to the City's current method and suggested implementing the idea in future projects. Mr. March suggested the City hold park/trail dedication fees as earmarked funds for future developments of trails. Specifically, the park dedication fee is $750 per lot and the trail dedication fee is $150 per lot. Councilmember Helmbrecht recognized the Developer's agreement did not indicate the trees would be balled and burlapped. Mr. Bergem responded corrections will be made to reflect the trees will be balled and burlapped. Mr. Bergem noted the site grading plan is in compliance with the building ordinance and is, as per the Building Official's recommendation. Mr. March suggested further amendments be issued to Staff as soon as possible to insure all changes are incorporated into the final Developer's agreement. Mr. Carlson emphasized their desire to begin construction the day after the June 10, Council meeting. Therefore, if any changes are needed contact him, so he can guarantee the Developers' agreement will be ready for the Council's approval. Mr. Bergem commented the lot size meets with city ordinance and a variance is not required with this development. Mayor Wilharber polled the Council and there were no apparent concerns. Mr. Bergem relaid Mr. Hellings took no exception to the Parkview Developers contract. 20th Avenue Update Mr. Bergem reported RCWD may give notice to proceed on May 28th. At that time, the City will request that the contractor sign off in agreement to commence work on the 20th Avenue project. 4 Street Name List Councilmember Brenner moved and it was seconded to approve the street naming list contingent upon Police and Fire approval and to send letters of appreciation to the committee members Motion carried unanimously_ NEW BUSINESS Sager's Liquor License Consideration Councilmember Buckbee moved and it was seconded to approve Sager's Liquor License contingent upon the State Liquor Controls' approval of an off sale liquor license Motion carried unanimouslv. COMMITTEE REPORTS Senior Housing Councilmember Brenner reported the Senior Housing open house is scheduled for Thursday, June 11, 1998, at 11:00 a.m. Business Appreciation Dinner Mayor Wilharber reported the Business Appreciation Dinner was held on May 19, and everything went well. In addition, thanks was extended to the EDC Committee for its help. Mayor Wilharber mentioned it was nice to see new and existing business owners at the dinner. Garage Sale Days Mayor Wilharber commented Garage Sale Days was held on May 15, and 16th. More than 100 garage sales were conducted by participating residents. ADMINISTRATORS REPORT Investment Policv In short, Mr. March submitted an investment policy for Council consideration, at a later date. Local Performance Aid Mr. March briefly explained the City plans to participate with the state Local Performance Aid (LPA), to receive State revenue. Water Sewer Rate Analysis Mr. March presented a water /sewer rate analysis for Council consideration. Councilmember Buckbee suggested investigating other communities' policies and procedures in regards to applying flat sewer rates among the residents. Councilmember Buckbee noted in the past residents have questioned the option of metering sewer flowage instead of applying flat rates. CONSENT AGENDA 5 ,r ADJOURNMENT Councilmember Helmbrecht moved and it was seconded to adjourn the May 27, 1998 Council meeting. Motion carried unanimously. The May 27, 1998 Council meeting adjourned at 7:30 p.m. Respectfully Submitted, Ry -Chel Gaustad, CMC City Clerk 6 DATE: May 27, 1998 TO: City Council City of Circle Pines City Council City of Centerville City Council City of Lino Lakes FROM: Milo Bennett SUBJECT: Ratification of expenditures and approval for payment of May expenses. Your approval of May expenses as listed on the attached copy of the check register, checks # 9535 - 9558, in the amount of $ 3,685.68, is hereby requested. MB /hc CC: 7 Circle Pines City Council 7 Centerville City Council 7 Lino Lakes City Council 2 File 05/27/96 at 12 :34PM CENTENNIAL FIRE_ DISTRICT PAGE 1 BANK CHECK REGISTER Checking account 05/27/98 TO 05/27/98 CHECK NO DATE TYPE PAID TO / DESCRIPTION CHECK AMOUNT 90-0 05/27/98 AP-I) CA-.E COUNTRY CHAPTER 135.00 953E 05/27/98 AP -D FRATTALLONE'S HARDWARE STORES 19.47 9537 05/27/98 AP -D FINA OIL & CHEMICAL COMPANY 132.76 9538 05/27/98 AP -D NORTHERN STATES POWER COMPANY 478.61 9539 05/27/98 AP -D US WEST COMMUNICATIONS 65.00 9540 05/27/93 AP -D B & S INDUSTRIES, INC. 11.9E 9541 05/27/98 AP -D ANOKA ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE 108.0E 9542 05/27/99 AP -D WELLE AUTO SUPPLY INC 93.28 9543 05/27/98 AP -D AT &T 20.65 9544 05/27/98 AP -D AT &T 9.97 9545 05/27/98 AP -D BRIAN D. GRUDEM, O.D. 91.35 9546 05/27/98 AP -D ANOKA- HENNEPIN TECH COLLEGE 530.00 9° 05/27/98 AP -D US WEST COMMUNICATIONS 64.93 9548 05/27/98 AP -D US WEST COMMUNICATIONS 82.04 9549 05/27/98 AP - -D C.P. OFFICE PRODUCTS 86.48 9550 05/2:7/98 AP -D MN FIRE SERVICE CERT. BOARD 175.00 9551 05/27/99 AP-D NATIONAL BUSINESS FURNITURE 431.85 9552 05/27/98 AP -D IKON OFFICE SOLUTIONS 43.9E 9553 05/27/98 AP -D US WEST COMMUNICATIONS 309.31 9554 05/27/98 AP -D EBROC 30.50 9555 05/27/98 AP -D JOHN GUSE 215.00 955E 05/27/98 AP -D STEVE POVOLNY 99.00 9557 05/27/98 AP -D PHYSIO- CONTROL CORPORATION 355.50 9558 05/27/98 AP -D POSTMASTER 96.00 05/27/98 at 12 :34PM CENTENNIAL FIRE DISTRICT PAGE BANK CHECK REGISTER Checking account 05/27/98 TO 05/27/98 CHECK NO DATE TYPE PAID TO / DESCRIPTION CHECK AMOUNT TOTAL MANUAL CHECKS (M) : _ 0.00 TOTAL COMPUTER CHECKS (C): 0.00 TOTAL DIRECT DISBURSEMENTS (D): 3,685.68 TOTAL CHECKS: -- - - 3, 685.68 DATE: June 3, 1998 TO: City Council City of Circle Pines City Council City of Centerville City Council City of Lino Lakes FROM: Milo Bennett SUBJECT: Ratification of expenditures and approval for payment of June expenses. Your approval of June expenses as listed on the attached copy of the check register, checks # 9559 - 9566 and # 11729, in the amount of $ 548.85, is hereby requested. MB /hc CC: 7 Circle Pines City Council 7 Centerville City Council 7 Lino Lakes City Council 2 File 06/03/98 at 11:58AM CENTENNIAL FIRE DISTRICT PAGE � BANK CHECK REGISTER Checking account ^ 06/03/98 TO 06/03/99 CHECK NO DATE TYPE PAID TO / DESCRIPTION CHECK -------- -------- ---- ------------------------------ --`--------- 59 06/01/98 AP-D FOOD-N-FUEL, INC. 27`. 9560 06/03/98 AP-D ARTHUR E MOHLER 2��| 9561 06/03/98 AP-D RANDY ROLSTAD 9562 06/03/98 AP-D HUGO FEED MILL & ELEVATOR 9563 W6/03/98 AP-D MINNFGAGCO to. W- 9564 06/03/98 AP-D PAGING NETWORK OF MINNESOTA 4n.43 9565 06103/98 AP-D C.P. OFFICE PRODUCTS 63.t 9566 06/03/98 AP-D UNIFORMS UNLIMITED 7��3 TOTAL MANUAL CHECKS (M): @.WW TOTAL COMPUTER CHECKS (C): Q�00 � � TOTAL DIRECT DISBURSEMENTS (D): 352.61 TOTAL CHECKS: 352.0 / Ma'? 31, 1558 12:07 PIN CENTENNIAL FIRE DISTRICT Pace PAYROLL COMPUTER CHECK REGISTER CHECK# EMP t0 EMPLOYEE NAME DEPT SOC -SEC -NUM CHECKBOOK /ACCT GROSS PAY DEDUCTIONS NET Puy 117 2360 MISCHKE, KATHY FIR 470 -86 -7273 2122.50 16.26 196.2= - ------ --- - -- - -- -------- - - - --- ---------------- ---------------- ------ -- - - -- --------------- - TOTALS 5212.50 $iE.26 5196.2= PAYROLL SUMMIARY FICA Social Security FICA Medicare Federal Tax Withheld Withheld Employer Owed Withheld Employer Owed Advanced EiC Paym nt= 5,00 513.18 313.18 53.08 $3.08 $.00 TOTAL TAX LIABILITY (32.5 2 MEMO DATE : June 5, 1998 TO Honorable Mayor and Council FROM : Jim March RE Terminal Transport - Special Use Permit A public hearing was held for the issuance of a special use permit for Terminal Transport. There were a couple of residents from Lino Lakes present at the meeting to view the sketch plan. The concerns were in regards to truck traffic going south on 20th Avenue and screening on the north side of Cedar Street. The Planning Commission recommended approval for the issuance of a special use permit, pending a revised landscape plan, a revised grading plan and contingencies placed in the permit. The contingencies would allow construction to begin at developer's risk and that no certificate of occupancy would be issued until the utilities are fully connected. The special use permit will also require a hold harmless agreement specifying that the contractor is responsible for working with the property owner in securing RCWD permits for their site as well as any parcel that receives run -off from this site (ie. the parcel to the north owned by Rehbein). The revised grading plan and landscape plan will be available for display at the Council meeting. The developer has incorporated the screening requests from the residents into the revised landscape plan. The landscape plan is estimated to be $15,000 and we will escrow for this item to ensure its satisfactory completion. I am having Greg review the draft special use permit that is included in your packet. The revisions should be ready in time for next week's meeting. CITY OF CENTERVILLE COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA SPECIAL USE PERMIT This Special Use Permit is granted by the City of Centerville, Anoka County, Minnesota, this day of 1998. WHEREAS, Brent Coatney ( "Permittee ") has applied for a Special Use Permit for site plan approval for construction of a office /truck maintenance building described below within the City of Centerville, Minnesota; and WHEREAS, such Special Use Permit is required by Zoning Ordinance #4, Appendix B - Industrial District; and WHEREAS, the Centerville Planning and Zoning Commission held a duly scheduled public hearing and recommend approval for such Special Use Permit; and WHEREAS, after review the City Council has approved the granting of such Special Use Permit subject to the following conditions. NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY AGREED as follows 1. That Brent Coatney shall be granted a Special Use Permit for a site plan to construct an office /truck maintenance building on property located at 6812 20th Avenue South, Centerville, Minnesota. 2. That this Special Use Permit is conditioned upon the following: (a) All construction activities upon such property shall comply with Ordinance #4 of the City of Centerville and any other building and zoning codes or ordinances applicable to the property. (b) Permittee shall ensure that the site is developed per the site plan attached to and made a part hereof as Exhibit A. Any changes from such site plan must be approved by the City Council. (c) The maximum number of on -site employees shall be dictated by the corresponding number of parking spaces as defined in Ordinance #4, Table C, Schedule of District Regulations Off Street Parking Spaces, Industrial Use. Any alteration to the parking lot will require site plan approval by the City Council. (d) The uses of the building will be for offices and vehicle maintenance. Any change in use not identified in Ordinance #4, Table A, Schedule of District Regulations Permitted Principal and Special Uses, I -1 Industrial would require approval by the City Council. 3. All parking and driveway areas shall be surfaced with asphalt or concrete and S 6.12 concrete curb and gutter shall be installed around the parking area. (a) The floor elevation of the proposed building will be no lower than (b) The parking lot of this facility will be graded to provide a minimum slope for drainage of 1% and shall be constructed to a ton axle bearing capacity. (c) Drainage on the site shall be consistent with the approved grading plan. 4. Landscaping shall be installed on site according to the approved landscape plan. All landscaping will be guaranteed for a one (1) year period. All replacement plants, if necessary, shall be guaranteed for a one (1) year period. 5. Permittee will provide a cash escrow or Letter of Credit in favor of the City of Centerville to ensure compliance with all the provisions of this Special Use Permit as well as all other ordinances, regulations and statutes of all governing authorities concerning the construction activities on the premises. The Letter of Credit or cash escrow shall be one hundred fifty percent (150 of the landscaping costs as estimated by the City Engineer. Should the landscaping plantings appear to be alive and healthy after the guarantee period, the cash escrow or Letter of Credit will be reduced or returned whichever is appropriate. 6. In the event that Permittee fails to comply with any of the terms and conditions set out herein or ordinances, rules and regulations of the State of Minnesota, County of Anoka, City of Centerville or any other governmental agency having jurisdiction over this project, the City Council shall have the right to immediately revoke the Special Use Permit. Any and all costs incurred by the City in the event of default by Permittee in any of the terms, conditions, ordinances or rules and regulations as provided above shall be the responsibility of the Permittee. The City shall have the right to draw upon the Letter of Credit to cover such costs and in the event such amount is insufficient, Permittee shall be responsible for any excess charges. 7. This Special Use Permit shall be subject to annual review by the City of Centerville. In the event the activities conducted on such property are injurious to the public health, safety and welfare, the City Council may impose additional restrictions in this Special Use Permit or revoke same. All conditions heretofore and hereinafter contained in this Special Use Permit shall be binding upon any and all officers and managing agents of the Permittee, and any of their heirs, transferees or assignees. 8. If construction has not commenced within (1) year following the granting of this permit, this permit shall be null and void and Permittee shall cease and desist from any further construction or work on said project. CITY OF CENTERVILLE Mayor Dated Clerk /Administrator Dated P$RMITT$S Brent Coatney Dated Terminal Transport �L -02 -1996 1644 P.01i02 O Howard R. Green Company CONSULTING ENGINEERS nmenynrsa Gl�sulfv,9 Ergrieer� June 2, 1998 File: 803880} POabiC Fax Note 7071 Diti C.Zjg 1 2 TO - V, M t l tB FMM Mr. Jim March cAloepc 9 o I Administrator City of Centerville 1880 Main Street F 'x" X421- �2 eN Centerville, MN 55038 S w „t� ta pes �d iy tKV RE: GRADING PLAN REVIEW TERMINAL TRUCK MAINTENANCE SITE Dear Mr, March; Paramount Engineering has submitted a revised grading plan, dated May 25, 1898, for the proposed terminal truck maintenance facility. We have reviewed this in light of the comments made in our letter to you dated May 22. This aftemoon I also talked with Mr. John Snyder of RJ Ryan regarding these same comments. The following is a list of comments based on the revised plan and discussion with Mr. Snyder. • Mr. Snyder acknowledged that the right o way for Cedar Street was not shown p,operly. They will take corrective action. This is further complicated by section B- E ,4) of the ordinance that calls for parking lots to be 25 feet from the street right of kasy. This will impact the parking lot layout and possibly the building location. • "he 130 -foot drainage and utility easement along the east side is shown erroneously and will be removed. • !'he plan shows curb and gutter at the entrance extending out to 20th Avenue ,'County Road 54). This could cause a maintenance problem for snowplows hitting [he curb, and also draining water out onto the road before R flows into the ditch. It would be better to stop the curb at the radius point. before it extends to 20th Avenue, and have bituminous spillways divert the water directly into the ditch. Mr. Snyder agreed that it should be shown this way, The existing drainage ditch along the south line should be within the right -of -way or in a drainage easement. When the right of way is properly shown, the ditch will be adequately located in the easement.. o �ao,n6tr36ao11eao.oao3.)une.aoc )26 Energy Park Or1Ve 5t. Paul, N1N 3'3108 619J844.4389 W8124444446 toll free ssa/366 -4389 JLN -02 -1998 1645 P. 02/02 Mr. Jim March June 2, 1998 Page 2 • Grades on the paving area have been adjusted and will allow for proper water flow. The dolly pads are at 0.5 %, but as they are concrete, water will flow along them 61 fficiently. • Curb Is now shown along the north line. There remains the question of the need for temporary bituminous curb along the east side of the paving area. • The pond, as shown on the site grading plan completed by Metro Land Surveying, dated May 14, 1998, is now shown and stormwater flows to it. Tne identified High Water Level is 904.5, which will back water onto the proposed Terminal Truck Maintenance property. A drainage easement should be given to cover the area where water will backup during the design storm. • Erosion control has been added and appears to be sufficient • Some wetland areas are shown on the Metro Land Surveying site plan. These should also be shown on the grading plan. The City may wish to know plans for wetland mitigation. These Items should be addressed and the grading plan resubmitted for final review. This review Is therefore considered preliminary and other issues may arise during the final review. If you have any questions, please let me know. Sincerely, Howard R. Green Company Phillip G. Bergem, .H. CC: Gerald Rehbein, Rehbeln Properties John Snyder, RJ Ryan Construction Bob Wiegert, Paramount Engineering and Design Dave Nyberg, Howard R, Green Company Frank Kriz, Howard R. Green Company PGB1st 0:1PR0ne03ss0MN- 0203.I n� Gvvard R Green Company CONSULTING ENGINEERS TOTgL P.02 I COMMERCIAL PLAN REVIEW' P R O P O S E D B U I L D I N G F O R FOR 000E COMPLIANCE TERMINAL TRUCK MAINTENANCE �°°°�'�°"'°' .�t�,>aE �.� A ur>@ am m aam ar. C O N T R A C T O R A R C H I T E C T E N G I N E E R mw ao uo ve wa%®a R J R Y A N L-A M P E R T S T R 0 H "' A1w0G mat nAaam aa•aaP C 0 N S T R U C T ION A R C H I T E C T S E N G I N E E R I N G °�� ° ° '/ °A ' n II ' "� 6511 Cedar Ave• South 548 138 Avenue NE 331 2nd Ave. N #200 0. FIRICABE 000M Minneapolis, MN 55423 Ham Lake, MN 55304 Minneapolis, MN 55401 } Phone: 612 - 866 -4632 Phone: 612- 755 -1211 Phone: 612 - 341 -9372 "� u �� } r� r a�,r ow L A Y P E R T _ fr � E�y�r��,,, ARCHITECT S } I .A�A POb _w (.x ]Y IM A—. ME a '4a[[bY• { l - KIY•w wfW b` 1M i ,vm :" ___ C w- "I., ],0 ' I N ass7e E _._._._._._._._._._._._.— _._.— +c ao �a?«< = Dfb uew,ECr axlsxwrae _ -'-'- --'- '-'-'- --'-'- 1 ,-o --- ' - ' - ' -- ' - ' --- ' - ' - +UruTrticolr -- s:,ara I T1PE6 .Im . ! - - - - -- -- --- - -- --- -- - - - -- -- r____ Sl_ - -I__ _ ___________________________L___ _ 0. o«r •*wruw • b+I PwPMw.•1 �sA �n� �+w,.. umxw x%ut I fdN: m1.Y P.b I � IwA�'v O 1 j I n Wd $ wm/0- �Vif-0•eG I an•/wt Ns 1 Fyn v ArY II,W ea%ay. u � 2 ]w. ,�` i i I ' '' _ _,_ I Is[,eMic a /rr�.w -M� P. •d Y' j a 1f � T $ eF 1: cfn • wnElt aeAalaa PAwK. I A•.r •,� - ,� tL" m • :Lase u. h _ 4F Ma VA, I 1 � %,aw a12 Kb -M.11 /� j ,ram I' i� A Ew enrlars ,vc 0. , x. v+r�.... P a a, .a ��]/ Em` (mz� ex-ava 4[ aua /Ar � \� \ \\ I I -� mAlwa yo K � RE$Ii1E MiN05 (L8C TAKE (VQ YM1rtv Pw9EMi t ,��n 1]mi „ BUIDING f. �� � ' w � " RRyon CmawcLtm, Inc. 0 1 = N 1I %� , n tim M wr w1I e•M Cc a • ra w esAv 5 ,a '\ ' I I ! C.X." 6'}."'kC:.:r4. � j fad sad $ L? b'd I ,]rc-a• lid I I �'y N -,e/rx s�nPE fi { { fi A ��n wrr I j I y �2b'Y HPS I I �I� L 000.PAN(.Y 111N (l6C TA9lE 70-N o I � 8 � 5 _ � (2 mTSj i I 310 b•w�91•� bYwi.lb A1V/f�lar ,� i I 1 I -Ynfd aawK I I I� 1 Dnm ` Z j � �-Md 1 / flaffHAEf DR-be I u[s ,00va /¢ Aw °' LLuml i awn a a� oa eom I : e+: ° °°^ 3 m l i e "" 0 < ulam Paaoa ea3l3m ro n+a, U— < I j sx RiAa a/d a Y r �iw a u. a� r I I -- I I I N I I § I I 1 a ul'.. o�rrPrr � O ! l i i $ i i I a �.. �..�•a... � Y C I I - 1 j 7. �r ry uaw \/ _ w - t3 oa a wrrtR `I.� 3E Rile 3/p j . a a o- Ir m]a %•a cc 1 1 1 '.r n�wr u. A •� C i., _______ _____________I____________� I IL OTIER �/ I ___ zwr.�t>r aaW m _ ._._._._._._ ._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._. _ Y�eAa[ &67'00 1 v xis as xu _. _._.- :y¢i._._._._._._._._.$ _._._._._.-._._._ ._._._._._._._._._._._._._. -._. _. H 8911YdC E __, wr.+•u` w.n J 50.00' �, a ewI awA _ ary M CEO AR STREET (GRAVEL) H o+ L N�91C FCIWlES - M61pM A(�E O Z C Y � • I i�rr �w i 11 y NOITII 11A1+ Q- •� SITE PLµ a E.a. r - L At �' ' i°� w PAIN M v Ir�E.rr+••arr� H � rw •, r P. bAwe 4bllrr • NLL% � I �— I T , Ma f%t%Ixa6 mui a y .f %V 1 ryy f W rF. I m IL PAMSOff OEIOk �.,� rf ..m g�� nui SR cov lr }, �, t lu AS I4[S,K lql w6•¢aY Yfp 1 IT�bJ B LL RL M CtliC = _ 1-�/t a.YOY t:[ m6 w..ut m M w �tl / np !! aPyO! r®t TI! M mL DM M • W,Itlur ' f C1NCm eM P Ya Yl mL ]tl S M [MID Md a161w 149.0 m Ply1r B(YLy10 laWOa CY mQ wL m2m Mw pEMyM]] 2 I IONE O AC PA¢a f a%%we rm mR Iw aai %AI M ll n /300 RT.[Nf ��� I tCYILID eY Aaliwmt.ltt / WTEA11 TW. �W wo, w y WF Mc Ai. P Q SPEpAL MSPFCRO6 NO TESIMO SOWLUFS -Now RP4lM k R V. ca+c ve yy � yy d veal 9 6 w lormlr 6 < a %o ro Co' Aoas sc � aa%aye n's I I I I P W I �'+ R ! .1' S-O• "i' lY qA PUaIYM PLAN � � �� � III 2•a TT I I I . ten. rw. ^ Sheet Number mrAC ®u� �� "v A/CESaYC CLRB LiIT E BOLlAfm DETAIL / i \A " PAf0011G 9GN = � ' TM — y B6- 72 CLM t GUTTER Al Vt - 1 A7 ,/3• - ,'"°' A, A 1 G I A7 �' • nw. [ nw r[ rw. L n — .- � ��ff .� - - - -- - - - - - - - --- -- -- - - - - - --- - - - --- s., _ y •.—.—._._._._.—._.—.—._.—.---------------— .— ._._._.— .— ._. —' —' -- _._ 85879 _______ —____________ mwuc2�GV[xr___ ¢r ! 1 ____________� I i I I I I IIII I I I j l 1 el I I I I I I I I I�( � i { I I HIIIM]6 PAwG � ero B`IW10.6 ' LD'-0' I �i PRC LDING — onwua A1a1 I j • BUILDING^ c l nlro� 1 upn y • •� �\`\ i j I lul (nil Rftrn Cmrtruclbn, Ina _ I � I I �__� I I 1 a tw A�n•Ma Wexv I I I I I j I I I I I L 9FAYekt 9fPE ___ _____ I _J 1 O )a I — " U S I I l ` lU L.—._._.- 11L;._.—._._.—._._._._._._._.—.—.—.—.—.-------------- _.— .— ._.— ,_.— ._.— ._.— . —. —._. N 89'10'44' E = OO O 50.00 c Y y CEDAR STREET (GRAVEL) C •� PIDITH �� C / 1 \LNIOSCAPE PLAN �0 F— � � c J `w H Q C O z d G c V L ce C L1J itlN Bl PfEl1K F A, yA � PLANTING SCHEOULE — r ulw •om ov rA.a — nmt e.wl aaty me aarwaev. tuc maul w.wP arr. mtnne - S IX 9.HM = iIL: O — d II- MwO.F iE Iwo RASIIC ® rA V.wn IAV9WLS A91 i rX aA uNfrn Pu�w .xo cr. ® �mcs w..r lanc aPwrxr a x Por x Pm � � ='1114 ___ °,u raanc taa l90 Punic L +, = rc w na.A nn¢,a caauro aca sewer ° r eA I.APDSCAM rc m tan n.•rnnagz amK an aPVtr k n ca en PLAN k' ,may i 1 1 Sheet Number v sn wA oaneam AetAs 2 Pgp,(E IMYbM1p PNLINN 91f22U8 PLfMING DETAL iREE PLANTNC DETAB. snify wn anon trtAs L I Lt rar m s uc L7 wr ro scar= L 1 G I_ J n-..: JAMES \TEPM.TRUK \A O O I�L C 0 -- 00 X0 0 O O -- OOi` a l � a I I ` _r I ,r � 14 - °3• ri 4 1 09 19 CSR — a _ r � sA� -- / — GO I d 4 4 C 9gg + r r -4 I I Ail . ���`` }I yq{ - f9 O a I — I , A q - -= �. =9899948 &s9g u r_r e. -0• r_r 3133 3333�3333� l i t + �A.r IklS3�g� 9 k Z' L d L$ A $ s I Proposed Buildin g For g K � TERMINAL TRUCK MAINT. �$ r t➢ t� 9 Centerville, Minnesota i� $ ; !,t L ,... IERU.7RUK \A3 : . 1 :7 e i I — li it !i li ii ii I! i! it ii ! li I I s g Proposed Building For ]HM R_ �> > F 13 TERMINAL TRUCK MAINT. W Centerville, Minnesota f2 'Ii fl m mp L J 3 RYA M1E Rl1T RARER l ' 2T RtCYMf VJ�E �/ S I L f W. ROT fJ1_ pSt 1 1lr 6iofa W °£ LA M ERT A R C H I T E C T 5 y 1c Ya2 e Su Ib I.wnw xf z —I' - T Mega, uN av6x ill _ __ ratan sn oRUn n .,R•�v>u�,::.m,vm nrw6xac AR[HIER CFRIi1CAllart r xm[ t>fne soRt �0m ��/( i wnr mr�r rnr a� rux. $ • 9fP M 5a iM .a iP,SgE L I11 I SR A£ �rcai a v4I v 5 � Rpry m3) RRe.� b avwum w uuQ. � y YC vw 1RfI6S Y RoE wa A6mf mw Fw0%W AVx16( LF54yfa OE➢.SIf RNE I/ r1 VNI x tw• o x R4R 1_� V WOY.A ve (� YOWY LOG.tpN A1fR ONNM 4l r, Rim. ( y � (613) f66 -0Ya a TLTsI /Y tlP MR16 _ r-r ■■ JJJ������\ •4 a la CV 1 f'1 RJ J Yy Cm6 Ctbn, Inc 1 a..r R.•w.w es.n 67 n M BOOR EL I1C0 fi rr ! 3 1WM LAOOER W/ ROOF HATOi Z p tY RECRSf TW, Y PIESAST fIDaR ffi M t/Y -a' Q Q L R o $ ----------------- - - - - -- - -------------- _ v � U C zit suwxr earn sttz a snArrr eom vf6s a wrt mr, y Ic •.Y ar_ 0 v b TI ` 6L anew row w/ T / GJ m •� Y CTG N% ad'b 6X LL £V6fr WL R•Wnw 4/D 5191_TI1Al iF3 1SS06 R4£ j 6t PSGrsi YC/6521[N 9AB SWFMK IES /f� OY �p}�➢ ' S! i6VACr IK�f1EL1g1 KE1.5 6 IS 0.0 Rl(9O6 S - (VK'4/Bt �RglV 911R166 r 6aem a e ru � mr� ru Y me sAe i c �I �� - :_ lea. ------- ____ __ I IIEZili z __ __ ------- -- _ SEC710M WALL i � Roo ______ __ __ _. 6 .t Number 6T �Y ire. f{fIR m RyfU6lK � - a • . � _ 6fi 9RVCRRAL e • -- - -- - - -- - wuL w w — O OMCE / Y lw.w. swnm o unzwR1E A 4 1 -a' ° A4 aH_ - V� J AES \IER`A.1RUK \51 i 7 L yt4 - - - --- --- ----- ---- -- - -- --- - ------ - �_ _ i - K uaas xmm § - - ----- ------- '-- -- --- ---- -- -- -- - -- --- -- ---- -- -- -- -- ---- - - ---------- -- ----- - - - - --- , > '• ]Ili {` � � I 3 4 qT 9, { e IIII R R if -a' r �Q rgle __ O — - ; - - I � 9 p f i i 0. 'P a �q - q -- _ -- -- - - - - -- ------ ------- -- -- -- - - -- F� i i g� - - -- - - - -- - - - - n I Y AY w 4� I i d f `77 - 1 kill 1 11 ?-AIN F � u ' IIIII T � K•4 w, a W+� � T -- e -- - --- �_� - - - -- -- -- - - -- .� - - - --- - - --- --- �- o.------ - - -- -- - -� -- � ( 1— 1 q j — 9 [ P V fF N �• N � 11 I o f f URI All 105 � A 4 l � psg� �'6fi� I a g Proposed Building For aI�� TERMINAL TRUCK MAINT. 1 G Q 9 Centerville, Minnesota D % r R 6 „ t J 0 0 0 0 0 0 SCd I 30'd x'-o SYd I aYd 1K n. Ma FA sOE • Pp p��j[ rn W4 - � q ' NJ SfMrtR Jmi aNeS 0. - „ fd !Ei BG IIP. A6i aACl�ll . a] WS Mtn4]IS nhl] v - a ws v3'cnm< axnxwrwc �. � N� I � TYPM.LL OETAL sme� n a we E g I I I I 4 ' t pxp� -MM 5 T R o H - -_' —_ - -_ —_ —_ m. 0 IwM mwa (M M nma (SSM � I -- - - ----- - - -- - -- - - - -- --- -- - -- -- --------- -I e, I 8 I � r ro scue L _ _ ___ ___ __ _ __ __ _ __ __ __ i mm.emx t l0 wtvrn a�.W'a�ois�rO�D,m I ( srs ro air � — a V I I , � �I 9Rp c ,wi vws aio nertv rsr etwnuou na+] sm rar - rns a.�aio ¢. - ,i>.a' ` Md U if y ¢ C a3»m sa sw wr+am TYPICAL DETAIL /� 6G.. M Pff 9aY W WS aR ICMC 0.VCW a1A 3/t - I "d CL W II � pEM IlYO Cb Yd NMTH L 1 1ROOF FRAI/NC mm s.moe c�5�c moss eemw v mTn"r �g F-n Q uay ee b cam w� w ru uco u vx vmo -anw ROOF FRAMM PLAN TYPIf]lL DETAA TYPICAL DETAIL Shoat Number S J 11St" Howard R. Green Company CONSULTING ENGINEERS Formerly MSA Consulting Engineers June 5, 1998 File: 260089m -0060 Mr. Jim March, Administrator Centerville City Hall 1880 Main Street Centerville, MN 55038 RE: PARKVIEW ADDITION Dear Mr. March: We will be in attendance at the June 10 City Council meeting for approval of the following items pertaining to the above referenced project: • Plans and Specifications and Authorizing Advertisement for Bids • Grading Plan • Development Agreement • Final Plat Following Council approval of the above items, the developer would pay all required fees for the project prior to final signatures on the plat and recording by Anoka County. The plans and specifications included with this information are preliminary. We will provide final updated plans with signatures at the June 10 City Council meeting. Mr. Paul Palzer, Centerville Public Works, and Mr. Clyde Chase, our inspector for the project, are reviewing the plans and will provide us comments to incorporate into the plan set before the Council meeting. Please review the enclosed documents. If you have any questions or comments about these documents before the City Council meeting, please give us a call. Sincerely, oward R. Green Company David E. Nyberg, P.E. Project Manager Cc: Mr. Paul Palzer, Centerville Public Works Mr. Clyde Chase, Howard R. Green Company Mr. Phillip Bergem, Howard R. Green Company Mr. Rick Carlson, Richard S. Carlson & Associates O: tPROJt260089m1089- 0503.iune. doc 1326 Energy Park Drive • St. Paul, MN 55108 • 612/644 -4389 fax 612/644 -9446 toll free 888/368 -4369 .r Parkview Addition DRAFT C O P Y Development Agreement June 5, 1998 DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT PARKVIEW ADDITION (City Installed Improvements) THIS AGREEMENT, made this d ay of 1998, is by and between the City of Centerville, whose address is 1880 Main Street, Centerville, MN 55038, a municipal corporation organized under the law of the State of Minnesota, hereinafter referred to as the "City," and Richard S. Carlson, as President of Parkview of Centerville, Inc., a Minnesota corporation, on behalf of the corporation, hereinafter referred to as the "Developer." WHEREAS the Developer has received approval from the City Council for a preliminary plat of land within the corporate limits of the City known as Parkview Addition, hereinafter called "Subdivision;" and WHEREAS the Developer has requested that the City construct and finance certain improvements to serve the plat; and WHEREAS the Developer is to be responsible for the installation and financing of certain private improvements within the plat; and WHEREAS the Developer has petitioned the City of Centerville to undertake certain public improvements within the plat; and WHEREAS said City Subdivision Ordinance and Minnesota Statute 462.358 authorize the City to enter into a performance contract secured by a bond, cash escrow, or other security to guarantee completion and payment of such improvements following final approval and recording of final plat; and WHEREAS Minnesota Statute 429 provides a method for assessing the cost of City - installed improvements to the benefited property; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises of the parties made herein, IT IS AGREED BY AND BETWEEN THE PARTIES HERETO: A. DEVELOPERIMPROVEMENTS The Developer will construct and install at Developer's expense the general improvement construction according to ordinance #8, Section 38.01 and other improvements specific to the development herein set forth. 1. Cost of Developer's Improvements, description: a. Street name signs (installed by the City) Approximately 3 @ $250 /each $750.00 b. Traffic signs, stop sign, dead -end, etc. (Installed by City) Approximately 5 @ $200 /each $1,000.00 c. Utility markers Approximately 10 @ $200 /each $2,000.00 %\SPNWFSW0Lf WATMPROP260089mW89. 1405.may.DevAgree.doc Page 1 `A Parkview Addition DRAFT C O P Y Development Agreement June 5, 1998 d. Street sweeping 6 times @ $600 /each sweeping $3,600.00 e. Signage and barricades 1 each @ $300 /each $300.00 f. Flushing of storm sewers, once per year until all lots are built on $5,000.00 g. Street lights Approximately 6 lights @ $500 /light $3,000.00 h. Shade trees (balled & burlapped; 1 per lot or 2 per corner lot) $300 /each (47 trees) $14,100.00 i. Snowplow service of streets 25 times @ $250 /each plowing $6,250.00 j. City administration for review and compliance of above 80 hours @ $30 /hour $2,400.00 Total Estimated Cost $38,400.00 Developer Retainage (150 %) $57,600.00 All of the above items under Section 1 with the exception of the trees and sod on unbuilt lots shall be completed and /or provided to the City by November 30, 1998. The Developer agrees to provide to the City a cash deposit of $10,000.00 for the purpose of a sod escrow. If the money is used to sod properties that are in violation of the City Ordinance, the City reserves the right to withhold building permits on the project until the $10,000.00 total deposit is restored. The deposit may be reduced at the discretion of the City and as requested by the developer as the number of lots remaining to be sodded decreases. The final deposit will be returned at the end of the growing season after the last lot is sodded. 2. The Developer shall undertake or arrange to accomplish the following: a. Coordinate with the utility companies to provide for gas main, telephone lines, cable lines, and power lines to service the properties developed on the final plat according to the City's joint trench policy. b. Provide seeding and vegetation maintenance and erosion control over bare or graded areas and mitigation area, at the City's direction. C. Provide street name signs and stop signs for installation by City staff. d. Establish lot corner monumentation within 60 days of grading completion or by September 1998, whichever is sooner. e. Provide such street maintenance and control of builder's actions to maintain roadways clear of mud, soil, and debris to provide safe driving surfaces. The 'AS PNWFS \VOLT\ DATA \PROJ1260089m \089- 1405.may.DevAgree.doc Page 2 Parkview Addition DRAFT COPY Development Agreement June 5, 1998 Developer shall provide street sweeping within 24 hours of the City's request for such services. f. Provide for landscaping in accordance with City ordinances and other requirements. The Developer shall accomplish or cause to be accomplished these actions according to generally accepted trade standards. The Developer will cause to be furnished to the City a schedule of proposed operations at least five days prior to commencement of his construction activities. Construction vehicles for site grading, streets, and utilities will utilize the existing blacktop surface on Centerville Road. No construction vehicles will be allowed to access the site from Dupre Road. 3. Site Grading. The Developer shall be responsible for providing the road sub -cut during mass grading of the site. Topsoil shall be stockpiled during mass grading. Also, a suitable stockpile shall be provided of material to backfill the utility trench, should a shortage from compactor occur. This material will be necessary to provide for volume losses due to compaction that will occur during utility installation. No certificate of occupancy shall be issued for any lot without the proper grading checked of those lots as determined by the Building Official. 4. Erosion Control. The Developer shall control erosion insuring: a. All development shall conform to the natural limitations presented by the topography and soil of the subdivision in order to create the best potential for preventing soil erosion. The Developer shall submit an erosion control plan, detailing all erosion control measures to be implemented during construction. Said plan shall be approved by the City prior to the commencement of site grading or construction. b. Erosion and siltation control measures shall be coordinated with the different stages of development. Appropriate control measures as required by the City shall be installed prior to development when necessary to control erosion. C. Land shall be developed in increments of workable size such that adequate erosion and siltation controls can be provided as construction progresses. The smallest practical area of land, as determined by the City, shall be exposed at any one period of time. d. Where the topsoil is removed, sufficient arable soils shall be set aside for respreading over the developed area. The topsoil shall be restored to a depth of at least four (4) inches and shall be of a quality at least equal to the soil quality prior to development and the Developer shall install four (4) inches of topsoil on all boulevards and seed or sod as approved by the City. The Developer shall make all necessary adjustments to the curb stops to bring them flush with the topsoil (before occupancy). All disturbed areas shall be \\SPNWPS \VOL IIDATA\PAO.R260089m \089 -1405. may. DevAgree. doc Page 3 Parkview Addition DRAFT C O P Y Development Agreement June 5, 1998 seeded. The quality of the top soil restored shall be equivalent to the top soil on the development prior to the removal. 5. Inspection. All of the work shall be under and subject to the inspection and approval of the City and, where appropriate, any other governmental agency having jurisdiction. 6. Easements. The Developer shall make available to the City, at no cost to the City, all permanent or temporary easements necessary for the installation and use of the Developer Improvements, as determined by the City Engineer. All such easements requested by the City shall be in writing, in recordable form, and on the standard easement form of the City and on such other terms and conditions as the City shall determine. 7. Faithful Performance of Construction Contracts and Letter of Credit. The Developer will fully and faithfully comply with all terms and conditions of any and all contracts entered into by the Developer for the installation and construction of all Developer's Improvements and hereby guarantees the workmanship and materials for a period of one year following the City's final acceptance of the Developer's Improvements. The Developer agrees to guarantee for a period of two years the tree plantings required as part of the Developer's Agreement. Each specific tree guarantee period shall begin with the planting of each specific tree. Concurrently with the execution hereof by the D veloper, the Developer will furnish to, and at all times thereafter, maintain with the City a cash deposit, certified check, or an Irrevocable Letter of Credit, based on one hundred fifty percent (150 %) of the total estimated cost of the Developer's Improvements as indicated in Paragraph Al. The Irrevocable Letter of Credit shall be for the exclusive use and benefit of the City of Centerville and shall state thereon the same is issued to guarantee and assure performance by the Developer of all the terms and conditions of this Development Contract and construction of all required improvements in accordance with the ordinances and specifications of the City. Such Letter of Credit may be reduced upon completion and acceptance of the Developer's Improvements by the City to an amount deemed adequate by the City Engineer to cover the one year warranty period described herein. The City shall have the right during said warranty period to draw on the Letter of Credit for any warranty work that is necessary. The City reserves the right to draw, in whole or in part, on any portion of the Irrevocable Letter of Credit for the purpose of guaranteeing the terms and conditions of this contract. The Irrevocable Letter of Credit shall be renewed or replaced by not later than twenty (20) days prior to its expiration with a like letter or bond. 7. Reduction of Escrow Guarantee. The Developer may request reduction of the Letter of Credit or cash deposit based on prepayment or the value of the completed Improvements at the time of the requested reduction. The amount of reduction will be determined by the City and such recommendation will be submitted to the City Council for action. \ \SPNWFS \VOLT% DATA \PROJ\260089m \089 - 1405. may.DevAgree.doc Page 4 Parkview Addition DRAFT C O P Y Development Agreement June 5, 1998 8. Approval of Contractors. Any contractor selected by the Developer to construct and install any Developer's Improvements must be determined in writing by the City Engineer to be acceptable. The City reserves the right to require satisfactory proof of successful experience and adequate financial status by any such contractor. B. CITY IMPROVEMENTS The Developer has requested that the City of Centerville undertake the following improvements pursuant to MS429: a. Installation of sanitary sewer and water distribution piping and services b. Installation of RCP storm sewers and catch basins of various sizes C. Installation of urban street d. Installation of sidewalk In accordance with the policies and ordinances of the City, the following described improvements (hereinafter collectively called the "Improvements "), to include improvements as described by the plans, specifications, and contract documents entitled Parkview Addition Street and Utility Improvements, as prepared by the City Engineer, Howard R. Green Company, and as adopted and approved by the City Council of the City of Centerville. Said improvements shall be constructed and installed by the City to serve the Subdivision on the terms and conditions according to Ordinance #8, Section 38.01 and other improvements specific to the development herein set forth: 1. Street Construction. The base course shall be completed before October 31, 1998. The wear course shall be completed when the City deems appropriate according to the progress of work on the individual lots. The Developer shall be liable for any increase in cost for construction of the wear course due to delays in construction on the individual lots. 2. Construction Procedures. All such improvements set out in Ordinance #8, Section 38.01, and as additionally specified herein shall be instituted, constructed, and financed as follows: The City shall commence proceedings pursuant to Minnesota Statute 429 providing that such improvements be made and assessed against the benefited properties. After preparation of preliminary plans and estimates by the City Engineer, an improvement hearing, if required by law, will be called by the City Council for the purpose of ordering such improvements. After preparation of final plans and specifications by the City Engineer, the installation of the improvements shall take place under the City's complete supervision. 3. Security, Levy of Special Assessments and Required Payment Therefor. Prior to the preparation of final plans and specifications for the construction of said improvements, the Developer shall provide to the City a cash escrow or letter of \ \SPNWPS \VOLT\ DATA\PROR260089m \089 -1405. may.DevAgree.doc Page 5 Parkview Addition DRAFT C O P Y Development Agreement June 5, 1998 credit in an amount equal to the estimated cost for preparation of plans and specifications, as established by the City Engineer. Said cash escrow, including accrued interest thereon, or letter of credit, may be used by the City upon default by Developer in the payment of special assessments pursuant hereto, whether accelerated or otherwise. Said cash escrow or letter of credit shall remain in full force and effect until the City Improvements contract has been let and the Contractor for the project has furnished the City of Centerville with a performance bond that would be executed upon award of the contract. At the request of the developer, and at the City's option, the cash escrow or letter of credit shall then be reduced or returned in full to the developer. The entire cost of the installation of such improvements, including any reasonable engineering, legal and administrative costs incurred by the City, shall be assessed against the benefited properties within the Subdivision in ten (10) equal installments with interest on the unpaid installments at a rate not to exceed the maximum allowed by law. Payment of the interest accrued on the special assessments levied shall be payable to the City Clerk on 1998. The balance of principal and interest of the special assessments levied hereto shall be payable to the City Clerk in semi - annual installments commencing on 1998 and on and hereafter until the entire balance plus accrued interest is paid in full unless paid earlier pursuant to Paragraph C herein. In the event any payment is not make on the dates set out herein, the City may exercise its rights pursuant to Paragraph D hereof. The Developer waives any and all procedural and substantive objections to the installation of the public improvements and the special assessments, including but not limited to hearing requirements and any claim that the assessments exceed the benefit to the property. Developer waives any appeal rights otherwise available pursuant to M.S.A. 429.081. The City, at its option, may elect to certify the entire assessment roll to Anoka County for collection with the real estate taxes. 4. Required Payments of Special Assessments by Developer. Developer, its heirs, successors, or assigns hereby agree that prior to or on issuance of certificate or occupancy, to pay the entire unpaid improvement costs assess or to be assessed under this agreement against such property. If a certificate of occupancy is issued before the special assessments have been levied, the Developer, its heirs, successors or assigns shall pay the City the sum of cash equal to the Engineer's estimate of the special assessments for such improvements that would be levied against the property. Upon such payment, the City shall issue a certificate showing the assessments are paid in full. Notwithstanding the issuance of said certificate, the Developer shall be liable to the City for any deficiency and the City shall pay the Developer any surplus arising from the payment based upon such estimate. 5. Acceleration Upon Default. In the event the Developer violates any of the covenants, conditions or agreements herein contained to be performed by the Developer, violates any ordinance, rule or \ \SPNWFS \VOLT\ DATA \PROI\260089m \089.1405. may.DevAgree.doc Page 6 Parkview Addition DRAFT C O P Y Development Agreement June 5, 1998 regulation of the City of Centerville, County of Anoka, State of Minnesota or other governmental entity having jurisdiction over the plat, or fails to pay any installment of any special assessment levied pursuant hereto, or any interest thereon, when the same is to be paid pursuant hereto, the City, at its option, in addition to its rights and remedies hereunder, after ten (10) days' written notice to the Developer, may declare all of the unpaid special assessments which are then estimated or levied pursuant to this agreement due and payable in full, with interest. The City may seek recovery of such special assessments due and payable from the security provided in Paragraph B hereof. In the event that such security is insufficient to pay the outstanding amount of such special assessments plus accrued interest, the City may certify such outstanding special assessment in full to the County Auditor pursuant to M.S. 429.061, Subdivision 3 for collection the following year. The City, at its option, may commence legal action against the Developer to collect the entire unpaid balance of the special assessments then estimated or levied pursuant hereto, with interest, including reasonable attorney's fees and Developer shall be liable for such special assessments and, if more than one, such liability shall be joint and several. Also, if the Developer violates any term or condition of this agreement, or if any payment is not made by Developer pursuant to this agreement, the City, at its option, may refuse to issue building permits to any of the properties within the plat on which the assessments have not been paid. C. RECORDING AND RELEASE The Developer agrees that the terms of this Development Contract shall be a covenant on any and all property included in the Subdivision. The Developer agrees that the City shall have the right to record a copy of this Development Contract with the Anoka County Recorder to give notice to future purchasers and owners. This shall be recorded against the Subdivision described on page 1 hereof. City shall provide to Developer upon payment of all the special assessments levied against a parcel a release of such parcel from the terms and conditions of this Development Contract subject to provision contained in the second paragraph of Section 3.G.3 on page 9. D. REIMBURSEMENT OF COSTS The Developer agrees to fully reimburse the City for all costs incurred by the City including, but not limited to, the actual costs of construction of said improvements, engineering fees, legal fees, inspection fees, interest costs, costs of acquisition of necessary easements, if any, and any other costs incurred by the City relating to this Development Contract and the installation and financing of the aforementioned improvements. E. OCCUPATION OF PREMISES The Developer further agrees that they will not cause to be occupied any premises upon the plat or any property within the plat until the completion of the gas, electric, telephone, water, and sewer improvements required by this Development Contract have been installed, unless the City has agreed in writing to waive this requirement as to a specific premises. Furthermore, Developer shall be granted no certificates of occupancy for homes within the plat prior to substantial completion of all Developer and City Improvements described in this Agreement. %ISPN WK VOL IIDATA IPROA260089m1089d4Umay. DevAgrce. doe Page 7 Parkview Addition DRAFT COPY Development Agreement June 5, 1998 F. CLEAN UP The Developer shall be responsible to keep new and existing streets clean and shall conduct routine sweeping of the project area. The Developer shall clean streets no later than 24 hours after being notified by the City. G. HOMEOWNER NOTICE Developer agrees to provide the owner of each lot purchased within the development on or before the date of closing the form shown as Exhibit A hereto. A signed copy of such agreement shall be returned to the City within ten (10) days fallowing execution by the homeowner. H. OWNERSHIP OF IMPROVEMENTS Upon completion of the work and construction required by this contract and acceptance by the City, the improvements lying within the public easements shall become City property without further notice or action. I. REIMBURSEMENT OF COSTS FOR DEFENSE The Developer agrees to reimburse the City for all costs incurred by the City in defense of enforcement of this contract, or any portion thereof, including court costs and reasonable engineering and attorney's fees. J. VALIDITY If any portion, section, subsection, sentence, clause, paragraph, or phrase in this contract is for any reason held to be invalid by a court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect or void any of the other provisions of the Development Contract. K. GENERAL 1. Binding Effect. The terms and provisions hereof shall be binding upon and insure to the benefit of the heirs, representatives, successors, and assigns of the parties hereto and shall be binding upon all future owners of all or any part of the Subdivision and shall be deemed covenants running with the land. 2. Notice. Whenever in this Agreement it shall be required or permitted that notice or demand be given or served by either party to this Agreement to or on the other party, such notice or demand shall be delivered personally or mailed by United States mail to the addresses herein before set forth on Page 1 by certified mail (return receipt requested). Such notice or demand shall be deemed timely given when delivered personally or when deposited in the mail in accordance with the above. The addresses of the parties hereto are as set forth on Page 1 until changed by notice given as above. \ \SPNWFS \VOLT\ DATA \PROJ\260089m \089- 1405.may.DevAgree.doc Page 8 Parkview Addition DRAFT C O P Y Development Agreement June 5, 1998 3. Final Plat Approval. The City agrees to give final approval to the plat of the Subdivision upon execution and delivery of this Agreement and of all required petitions, bonds, fees, and securities. 4. Incorporation by Reference. - All plans, special provisions, proposals, specifications, and contracts for the improvements furnished and let pursuant to this Agreement shall be and hereby are made a part of this agreement by reference as fully as if set out herein in full. L. VIOLATION OF AGREEMENT In the event that Developer violates any of the covenants and agreements contained in this Development Contract and to be performed by the Developer, the City, at its option, in addition to the rights and remedies as set out hereunder may refuse to issue building permits to any property within the plat until such time as such default has been corrected to the satisfaction of the City. M. PARK DEDICATION The park dedication requirements due to the City of Centerville in the amount of $750.00 per lot for 42 lots, resulting in a total fee of $31,500.00, shall be paid in cash at the time of the signing of the final plat. N. TRAIL DEDICATION The trail dedication fee in the amount of $150.00 per lot for 42 lots resulting in a total fee of $6,300.00 shall be paid in cash at the time of the signing of the final plat. O. STORM WATER FEES The storm water fee shall be paid in cash to the City according to the interim policy of storm water charges at a rate of $0.01546 per square foot for a total amount of $12,916.53, based on an area of 19.18 acres, at the time of the signing of the final plat. DEVELOPER CITY OF CENTERVILLE Parkview of Centerville, Inc. By: By: Mayor ATTEST: By: City Clerk 1 \SPNWFS \VOLI\ DATA \PR07\260089m \089- 1405.may.DevAgrce.doc Page 9 Parkview Addition DRAFT C O P Y Development Agreement June 5, 1998 I, , the undersigned, do hereby verify that I am an officer of the corporation known as Parkview of Centerville, Inc., and hereby personally guarantee all duties, obligations, and undertaking of said corporation set forth in this Development Contract. STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) SS. COUNTY OF ANOKA ) On this day of 1998, before me, a Notary Public within and for said County, personally appeared Tom Wilharber to me known to be the Mayor of the City of Centerville, and who executed the foregoing instrument and acknowledged that he executed the same on behalf of said City. Notary Public STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) SS. COUNTY OF ANOKA ) On this day of 1998, before me, a Notary Public within and for said County, personally appeared Ry -Chel Gaustad to me known to be the City Clerk of the City of Centerville, and who executed the foregoing instrument and acknowledged that she executed the same on behalf of said City. Notary Public STATE OF MINNESOTA ) )SS' COUNTY OF ANOKA ) On this day of 1998, before me, a Notary Public within and for said County, personally appeared to me known to be the person described in and who executed the foregoing instrument and acknowledged that he executed the same as his free act and deed. Notary Public 260/083- 1904.teb Parkview Addition DRAFT C O P Y Development Agreement June 5, 1998 EXHIBIT A I, future homeowner of Lot _, Block Parkview Addition Development, do understand that: It is my responsibility as property owner that within 30 days (May- September) or by June 1 st (October - April), my lot will be landscaped and sodded per ordinance in a manner that prevents erosion due to wind or water. • It is my responsibility as property owner to maintain the sod and trees that have been installed. Trees are guaranteed for two years from initial plant date. • Grading will not be altered on my lot. Drainage will comply with the grading plan. I understand that there may be drainage easements, utility easements and/or trail easements on my property. I understand that sidewalk is part of this development and may be constructed on my lot. Date: Buyer /Homeowner Signature A copy of this must be returned to the City of Centerville, 1880 Main Street, Centerville, Minnesota 55038, prior to issuance of the Building Permit. \ \SPN W FSIVOLI \DATA \PROJ\260089m` ,089- 1405.may.DevAgree.doc Parkview Addition DRAFT C O P Y Development Agreement June 5, 1998 EXHIBIT B CASH FEES 1. Stormwater Fee $12,916.53 2. Park Dedication Fee ($750 per lot/ 42 lots) $31,500.00 3. Trail Dedication Fee ($150 per lot/ 42 lots) $6,300.00 4. Sod Deposit $10,000.00 5. Final Plat Filing $200.00 6. Administration Fees $100 /Lot $4.200.00 TOTAL FEES $65,116.53 SECURITIES 1. Developer Improvements (Paragraph Al) $57,600.00 TOTAL SECURITIES $57,600.00 \ \SPNWFS\ V OL 1\DATA \PROI\260089m \089 -1405. may. DevAgree.doc MNM pRnl M PARKVIEW ADDITION _ � w _� ° STREET, STORM SEWER, SANITARY SEWER vrROm a AND WATERMAIN a N PROJECT LOCATIO a IMPROVEMENTS MRW Rw ;. r4 .] wW,[,r wwrt 91 Am" Ira ne. rr s, rq ar AM I •ust 'x5 onrld 1. n, dGO. •✓O 0.urt {I YAM ya ¢n M1 MA Y u r Ia uw uae � _ CUKWN, n lIN6m IM N9[n M Ow] O Mli SML 4 w K. np t Ko«n cw�o ML YA I MAL I ER-BY CERTIFY THAT T HH 6 PLAN, SPECIFICATION, .p ma.n Kaa uw¢.v Rd r.ra rW0 OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT w d n rw,r °� PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER ( THE Y LAWS OF T nu d rn. Ter. P.¢ w STATE OF MINNESOTA. nr.srouln DATE REG.NO. mn. 1] !mr lol sir. d.wnSYF RORRV ~ Ah'9 K I.. AAA.K sv.0 1326 ENERGY PARK DRIVE ""` ST. PAUL, MI N N ESOTA 62) 64454389 0.4 Crd _ � RI ]Y n0.K a HDArcrd R. Green Company `( 13 esn CONSULTING ENGINEERS ]su nuE. uvn¢ Rm¢nd,r wd VK ] PREPARED FOR: .ward ' °ON1 sa PURSUANT TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF M.&21613.04, THE GOPHER STATE ONE —CALL NOTIFICATION CENTER WAS CONTACTED ON ,NNE ITH, 1998 a AND THESE PLANS INCLUDE THE TYPE, SIZE AND GENERAL LOCATION OF G / ViLGe THE UNDERGROUND FACILITIES AS REPORTED BY THE AFFECTED OPERATORS OF THOSE FACILITIES AS OF JUNE 8TH, 1998, THE DATE OF THE 8{!aElish{d 1857 COMPLETION OF THIS FINAL DRAWING, THIS INFORMATION MAY NOT BE RELIED ON AS WARRANTING THE ACTUAL PRESENCE, CHARACTERISTICS, OR LOCATION OF THE UNDERGROUND FACILITIES AND DOES NOT RELIEVE ANY PERSON FROM COMPLYING WITH STATE NOTIFICATION AND LOCATION REOIREMENTS PRIOR LOCATION MAP TO EXCAVATION, JUNE 1998 SHEET 1 OF 17 ,RIB! ID R/W R/W RO� 30 30 , -- _ i 13.5' 16.5 16.5' 13 5' SURMOUNTABLE A 6 CONCRETE CURB k CUTTER 4' 5' 4.5' R 1 /4' /FT. 0.02' 111,, 1 4" F(. - + O 4' CIXJC. WALK 4' COMPACTED SAND NOT SIDEWALK TO BE 4 DRAIN TILE C AS SHOWN ON PLANS. TT - 1 1/2 1340 TINE 41A BITUMINOUS NEAR COURSE T � TACK COAT . - 1 1/2 2340 THE 318 BITUMINOUS BASE COURSE -- fi CLASS 5 AGGREGATE BASE A 20 MODIFIED SELECT GRANULAR BORROW GEOTEXTILE FABRIC 1 TYPICAL STREET SECTION M (] TON RESIDENTIAL) OR LF L _E 8 r E' 002'/FT, E � r M I L L L — !� O O —_ i 4 CENTER STREET 4 -- Z 2340 TYPE 41A BITUMINOUS NEAR COURSE 6 CLASS 5 AGGREGATE BASE ® BIT PATH D 20 ° vCRT 5 BY: .pB NUMBER nEBE6r ¢nr „r >tiAr rnls P,Ax. vECi�c,no-v, „0. o,rE av mEV Vw o1U 11noN 1316 ENERGY PARK IXIIYE s EEr No -- DESIGNED BY P B JOB DAM JUNE 1996 ry1 RT 1 „5 gSP140 91 uE GP L„C(x Yr VRcr ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA 551IN CITY OF CENTERMLLE SANRARY SEWER, STORM SEWER AND WATERMAIN GRAM RKM 260089M 9MErtM901 C54W CNO „N0 m I w , 0 E r R W TU (611) 6p -4369 2 GRAM PaCS+LL KCN NCEP TxE LAwS OE vE - L APPRO� O: - -- CAD DATE: JUNE 1998 s,rt v Nixxcs0rw PARKVIEW ADDITION INDEX SHEET I CAD FILE: 260089 -L Howard R. Green Company CONSUL ENG 17 MEADOW LANE SEE SHEET 10 d^ la a °M ' I, 2" TEMP. BIT PATH 8 " -22y2 BEND rc _ 8" VALVE 0 HYD w/VALVE 10' -6" LEAD R -215 .N s — 8'X6" TEE L =12fi u yX •D ,p om PLACE HYD. 3' BACK OF CURB Deg0=O3°1 s'oa' TO AVOID 5' SIDEWALK RAIN BIN REMOVED — m BY OTHERS F & 1 40' - 15" CMP wV, - W/ 2 APRONS (} • � AF,9ACb ,+": 've ,;,! }. �(.' �. KK'Y- ,�S`NA�';i y , , SEE SHEET 4 i ^F AFB � 5 ✓i ° 1. " wsus., Y MILL EXISTING BITUMINOUS SMOG SURFACE 1" DEEP X 4' WIDE jTAPER STRAIGHT LINE CUT, TACK & MATCH EXISTING BITUMINOUS I I I1 IL K 2 3 o 5 \V SEE SHEET 11 0 20 o _KR1J f•i N N N 925 �m m m a 925 ' i 50. v6 920 �.: n _ 920 7777777 7. - a m a 915 ° - -- -- -- _ - ^ -- — -- I — x_915_ FINISHED FE :GRAD '. {... _... _. OP 9 -O 50% . TOP 911.10 ICJ1 POINT E V- 912 910 _ GH- RMLlLb_ L+Dzz _ -. 910 E TOP 908 50 - PN STA - 1 +D6 - - _ 15" Ci.1P ONSTRUCiH '- PN EIEV - 912.33 - - 75 IN - - _ A ❑ - '1':10 SUBGRADE PROFIL CO R 905 K - 5.42 _— t 905 .- 4T PvC W TERMAIN 900 _9po -- 157' -8" PVC SANITARY 0.010% - 89810 -.. 323 - j PVC SANI ARY O 0,821 89 .77. E b T636 E - 89 93 9.45 EIDSTIN - -- ' ' E CONNEC TO EXISTIN �O TSID E DROP MANHOLE i I 5 P I WRY UnIXV IXAT mi5 `LAN, mECU,CAnCx, N0. D/.IE BE 12M4CN DCSOnvnW 1326 ENERGY PARK DRIVE ^ � ^C CENTERVILLE SxEC! x0. DE9CNED BY: JOB DATE: MAY 1998 DX VCPD`l e s PIdPA4[D B� Irt a L«M.'X fl(C! ST. PAUL. MINNESOTA 55108 C OF CE 3ANffARY SEWER, STORM SEWER AND WATERMAIN RNM 2600 APPROO CAD DA 694 a`fNM9d µo n,A! w A WLY g "UKD (6121 6 4 -TMS 3 DRANK BY; JOB NUMBER PPClC49VIAt fXOMECfl IIXDfP MC UN$ C! IN( NL: _ - -- IS: MAY 1996 +TAR a ,InvXCwlA PARKMEW ADDMON MEADOW LANE a CAD FILE; _ 2600.99 -K - I ILJVVQrd R. Teen Company STA 0 +00 TO SEA. 5 }00 oeR 9ECeo. CONSULTING ENGINEERS 17 PED RAMP �/ MEADOW LANE _ 8 " -It y4 BEND 6 8'%8'TEE 8' VALVE SEE SHEET 3 GL 909.55 > a C CL 909.69 � TC 910.28 9.70 0.¢ D30�1oi523 g0 33' -15" RCP CL V 8` %8 "TEE 00) 32% TC 910.31 I�j I , 8 " -11 4 BEND GL 909.7 + 8"-2a BEND 8" VALVE A 1+ TMH 8' -11 W BEND s GL 909.69 C 910.31 TC 910. ,b PED RAMP °`' SEE SHEET 5 33' -18" RCP CL III v GL 909.72 00.26% I .. 1 � 97 00 0`TID aO)a 21 TMH A. Gl 908.79 TMH STMH� �. CL 909.62 909.I3 � C 309.] TC 909.]2 iC 909..2 32'-15 "RCP CL V F� 0 20 O 0.32% TC 90 : + V `.:. �^ s SEE SHEET 7 C6 SEE SHEET 9 u vil,1. GL 909.0 h m m I m$ I 92 925 tow PgHT EL V e 91006 .:: ICH POINT _E EV. a 910.5 LYW _: PCIN7 ST = 5 +73.24 - IV PONT 5 A 6 +999 1 - - - MU STA = 5 +73.15 - :PN STA - 7 +00 _920 L PVI ELEV 910.00 _ '.PN ELEV =_ 910.63 _ -. -_. 920 -- _ m - ' -. - _- . -_ n n .. �n ar _. n yl: A D. 0.99 m n -_ ud o.:: K .13 o _ :: o:. K t _. 915 m -� - -- - - f_915 m m so DO- DO VC w soo've. 910 - OB 910.01 - -- "' TOP 970.08 FINISF�ED Q CRADE - _ -- -- 1 -0. - -- _- 909 - UB RADE PROFIL _ -TOP S .... 0636 SE- 54 15 - - 186 -21 R P CL III 0023% /O5' 21` R�P. CL el O 23% _ - P roWA " 905 : : 906.05 SE OS NW -- _ - 71' 21' RCP CL III 0.25X - R .. OS 9 SW _ 7 90538 E - i 905.14 w - _ n 9 05 .CL V O 0. ;-. 05.00,E­ .: , - ::, 905.14 E 900.44 N G4 E 9OO 488'- PVC wATE AIN 1 900 44 $ 66' 8" VC $ANITAR 4'- ` P SANITARY 06.40% TA 9O0 RP' Oi __ - . -.._.. _. -. _... 900 7 ___ _. 899.80 E 898.a0 : 98.E 227 8 $ANI 79 � 899.70 W 5 598.79 S I I OVERBURY ATER _ MA IN 1 - -_- TO MAINTAIN 18' VERT ry SEPERATI BETWEEN WATERMAIN ANO SANITARY EWER +6 + ++ + + e 1 4 KR®r <[fl \FY \11nS \VA$ ft., SPCfbKATDN. N0. DAR BY riEM4M msc,pi 1325 ENERGY PARR DRP,E 91EEr ND. - DESCNED BY: °U JOB DAZE: MAY 1998 w KR l u5 R AMD By,A m U.AT .r MSC\ ST. PAUL, MINKSOTA 55108 CITY OF CENTERVILLE SANITARY SEWER. STORM SEWER AND WATERMAIN 4 DRAWN BY. RKM J09 NUMOER 26D069M SVRRN9Pl AND i"nr. w A My RCOSRRED _ 612 BCi[59CNn NGNEER UNDVN 1 L.1 0( 1Nf ( 1 61a - a]69 APPROVED: - -- CAD DAZE:!JRY 1996 5,AM a PARKVIEW ADDITION MEADOW LANE a CAD PILE: 260089 -2 DAR - �DND. s=CNSUVN R. Green Company STA 5 +00 TO STA WOO ENGINEERS 17 . MEADOW LANE t PEO RAMP 8' -11 SEND CONNECT TO EXISTING 8' -222' BEND WATERMAIN CB 5 � a ^e • ^ +�_ GL 9 .4 _ •,O0? MILL EXISTING BITUMINOUS SURFACE I' DEEP X 4' WOE, STRAIGHT LINE CUT, TACK & E MATCH EXISTING BITUMINOUS SEE SHEET 4 - -rn -pi • • • m Die m O • fie CONNECT TO EXISTING 5 L 9 8,48 \ \ R- 355.79 SANITARY SEWER 7 I . s L- 160.37 .�. TP1 =8L5 4 • ej Ob DNIO =2 ° So C\ ®np l 0 2 SEE SHEET 6 0 lrt:u i Q r%2 m a $ $ m $ m m a m -925 LOr/ POINT ELEV 908.99 LOW OINT STA . 10 +41,18 A 10 411 _ V P W NLEV 9 .93 920.. _. 50 915 - u m o a — _ _ ._ - - -- - 915 m 50.00 _ 910 aP 809'.m - OP09.4z -- -- i _. 910 -- - I -; - R -- - _ 905 904.50 W 905 -- - — - - - - 5 -B PVO AN17AR 90 70 5 - - " P ITARY d % IN .692 Jd 0.40% '" 90 70_,E 902.81.E -. 900 ao 7a T:OD _ - '° A I :. 900 .. - 268' -8' P WATERMAIN i U WA MUN __ —_ __ ------ TO MAINTAIN TBII VERT ., ., SEPERATICN BETWEEN { - WATERMAI AND 1 I I f _SAN ITARY E_ g R MAY 19 90 I NEREBY IXRRY MAT MIS RNI. WCKICAP.. M0. OeR BY REM9PY CESCeG11M 1326 ENERGY PARK MW AIEEI N0. DE9GNED BY: PB _JOB SATE: pf 0EN]01 NAS RPEPMFp er NE oa uNLR Nr.Kc ST. PAUL Mw11ES0TA 93108 CITY OF CENTERVILLE SANITARY SEWER, STORM SEWER AND WATERMAIN 5 RKM NO I w A 0.Rr %09BI`EO DRAW Rr: „b9 NUMBER _Y_ 2600B9M 1 998 RBO A'°E "S l AL ENOWER "fXR ME TAU (8121 641 -4]89 S V 7NE _ PARKVIEw aoomoN MEADOW LANE a APPRQb D: _— - CAD DAM: MA 9A¢ 6 wNxE501 e. CAD FILE: 260 -3 REC x4. _ Howard R. Green Company STA 70+00 TO STA 12+72 oerz CO ENGINEERS 17 MEADOW LANE SEE SHEET 5 9 q .° 24 I 100 YEAR ELEVATION = 906.50 I I PLACE 4,6 CU.YAROS d CLASS III RIPRAP GL C13 4 SEE INSET ® '� I MONITURING ` — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 20' d°inoge t Utility E°scmml 0.50 1+B0 1 +50 +71. STUH 5 GL 908.48 r m q P I a a o a o m � SEE SHEET 4 rrat. 5 N T T T U P ON U T 915 - — - = - - - - - 915 INSET - 54 IS y - R - CP O ISO - - 910 Jib 191Q F"NISHEO PROFILE ._ - I I 905 -- S05 yrt - -- a7r -7 1 Rcr a m b ois>< (16 t6' heaaN) - -- _.. - -- _ 905 9B4;e0 w 904.90 W 904.70 S HY+VC Ai,- P SAN b b IF 904:70 E 900 9U �INV. 9012 .900. 895 895 -- — - -- 895 890 890 I i J , i -- -- 1¢t¢Rr IDIK TxA, nns vi.w, srzovIWUN. 1326 ENERGY PARK DRIVE P MAY 1996 nn. oeTC 6Y flCNA6N O[SCAianU' L17 DEWNE0 BY: JOB DAM: 1 R Kf f RAs I+¢vrxm RY uE m ONOU1 Vr wrtn ST. PAW„ MINNESOTA 55106 CITY OF CENTERALLE SANITARY SEWER, STORM SEWER AND WATERMAIN aMRN9W AND mnT I AN A DULY pRA`AN BY RflM .109 NUMBER 3 6089M °1E590N.4 EN (612) 611 -x569 APPRBNEp: �._ —_caB OA1E: M 1998 STAR a NINNESaTA. PARKVIEW ADDff10P1 MEADOW LANE STORM OUTLET CAD FILE: 260009 -3A o.N R. Green Ccmpany STA 0+00 TO STA 1 +71.5 NSULTING ENGINEERS SEE SHEET 4 MEADOW CIRCLE T 1 n CB n ° I4 GL 909.72 J — m T 1 HYD ,!/VALVE 12'- , LEAD B'X6' TEE B'-45� BEND r A�' 90 8' VALVE t" + v. a• PT - �4 v _ SEE INSET CL 909.72 0 "0 9 e ✓j 6 3 ° 9 2 6 T 1 J�1J, if SEE SHEET 3 SEE SHEET 8 a 20 Q �4Ri 5 n . -_. w -_ 920 w w w w w w w w w w w w IN o& - +� - 92O _St -15' C, V -RCP O O S2% 915 Sib 1 915 FINISHED Q ADE S - - TOP 91116 1 a - 0,50% 906. 0-N 9 10 W TOP 910.0 _ _._ -____ _91 _910 3b5 ^ D6 0 E 00 N _ 1: % 1 _ - -'- - - 7.S MIN a' xAY. - 906 9 NW - COVER 905 9o0 506.9 E SUBGRADE OFIL — — -- } -- _ — _ i 905 mm arocc _ _ 900 905 -- -895 .V V 3- 4r -8 PVC TERMAIN WA I - — - — _ = 898.79E 332• B' PVC SAKI ARY -O 062 - 90085 N 89879 S .. : _ 1 895 IL 89;,69 W 9'9 895 F7 --- — - — - — - - - I 1 — — — °, ; j +rtMAr anon met nos a.x, mEUr¢nnw. 029 ENERGY PARK Mw PB MAY 1998 x0. PntE Br x[xs,o OESGianCN 5T, PAVL, YU4NES0TA 35109 CfrY OF CENTERVILLE 9�EEt rva. D9vcM9D er: . 9 DATE: KK T " +s vrYv "r»<w ". PP[CE SAMTARY SEWER, STORM SEWER AND WATERMAIiV 7 smrsxsw -0 m +t +" n ov,r xEasrzr¢o ORAwry BY: RKM _J09 NUMBER 260D89M Bp[s90rvu CxIW".xKE mE u"s (812) 644 -q99 APPR0VE0: =.. —_CAD DATE: NAY. 1998 sT.rz °` "'""`"°'"" — PARKVIEW ADDIMON MEADOW CIRCLE cnD Pipe 790069_4 - - — I- IcNVard R, Green Company STA. 0 +00 TO SFA 3 +30 R 17 CONSULTIN E SEE SHEET 11 MEADOW CIRCLE SEE SHEET 7 \ \ \ \ \ \ 8 7 0 TC 91576 0�e� \ 4A 11 � PC TC 912.88 v ;n TC 914.2} M1 8 " -I l Y4 BEND SC 912.66 8 r 8 "�5 BEND IT . 5*- L \ J 5 LEAD TC 913.76 l 8 " %6" TEE \ 16 16 1 BEND 14 13 a° .I 8" VALVE 0� 20 5 SEE SHEET 12 O DO N n O N Yl K1 O m w — NO V Y 0 w W0 o o :- o - N1 rj •1 ^1 n r + - w 920_ m h m m m m m w w m m m 920 915 - - _ :. - S _ �3NLSH 0 Q- GRADE_ — ___ ._ _. __ _ _ - -___ I 915 k N 0.5D% C T 911.66 910 _ _ - - - -- -- -- - -- - - - - - - - -- - -- - - - - - - - - -- - -- - - -- - _910 COVER UBCRA E PROFILE 905 - - - - { 905 549' WATERMA(N _ 90� .02: E 334'-8 PVC �SAWTARY -0 0.62% 1 900 900.95 w ... { 900.85 N _ 895 -- - -- - - - -_ - __..__895_. 4- MAY 1998 �rxr¢er ¢alav 1RAT nns qAN. SVCCaicAIDR. 1326 ENERGY PARK DRIVE OE9GNED RY: PB JOB DATE; d ffxnl aA5 NFa41(➢ Bf M[ W I.nLFA av pnEC1 N0. DATE 9Y IIENAM pFSCMPpLM S Ff! Np. wPEaxspN ANp ,wAT M. A pplr afa,= 5T. PAUL, MINNESOTA 55108 CITY OF CENTERVILLE SANITARY SEWER, STORM SEWER AND WATERMAIN DRANK BY: R JOB NUMBER - 260089M aapffmwu ENdMER uNpFa IRE fANS t€ 1R (612J 644 -4389 8 APPROVED: - -- CAD DATE: MAY 1998 STATE X mNNfw,A - (�� p rvf PAWVIEW ADDITION MEADOW CIRCLE CAD PILE: 26 0089 -5 _. -_— I IIJVVGTrI,.I R. L een Co I Ipany ¢ DAM afc NO. C ONSUL TI NG ENGINEERS STA 3 #30 TO 3TA 8 +78 �7 MEADOW COURT n + 8 BEND / .' SEE SHEET 13 g^ VALVE ,.i =.. \ PED RAMP, e'�15" BEND SEE SHEET 5 8' -11 BEND TC 91 6 aF `' T HYD w/VALVE I8 -6' LEAD dt / 8 " %6 TEE �9 g T I . q TC 914. 4 n HYO w�VAL VE 10' -6' LEAD REDUCER C GL 909.00 L T •Qu TC 91 6 taw �ZB °3T n pe \to ry SEE SHEET 4 0 20 p ARI 6 _ _ O QI OI :: OI OI w P VI OI q � � T � T 925 m _ - - - - - — - i 925 920 N „ 920 ---- - - - W 915 . N s s FI q iSHED q 044E ( 915 x0.80 TOP _ W i 910 - -- ov aacc a 0% TOP 91o.3a E - - _° ( l - - - 910 _ _ _ 10 - 1 _- - - -- - _ SUBCR DE PROFILE _ 905 4 NW COVE -. 905 -- __ 905. .. 4 PVC W AIlT 903.0 IN 40 -8 PVC 9ANuTARY O .78% - - 900 sANI R 0 1.00% 901.53 s _ - - __ _ -_ , _ ___ 900- ,44 5 901 43 N 900.44 N 900.34 ii a # 1336 ENERGY PARK DWK SANITARY SEWER, STORM SEWER AND WATERMAIN ffREBY URTr 1Xnt MIS RwV. X0. OnIE RY REN4CN DESCRivPW SMEE! n0. DESIGNED : RB _.LOB DAIS: MAY 1998 m REPFI wns Brtn T r W w AN,, ur o- 51•[C4iCnPM. ID, Si. PAOL. MINNESOTA 4389 CITY OF CENTERVILLE 9 RKM 2600 arcaxxm mE- Mni m " wnv ncasrtREo- (612) 644 -4389 p ARAKN RY: • A D NUMBER MAY 1998 UE54dM FxpxfCR IwMR iraE inNS IF ME __ PARKVIEW ADDITION MEADOW COURT IT CAD RILE: 260089 -6 APPROVED : CAD DAM Sr 2IX mewE50Yn. Lam,, ,.1 �" een Company STA 0100 TO STA 3 #40 B.rz � - -�-- -- _ 1 M'Valu R. G reen C ONSULTING ENGINE 17 _ CENTERVILLE ROAD ST. GENE`eEVE CHURCH ARNOLD DREWLO •gb •$ 8' PLUG DIRECTIONAL BORE jvr REMOVE 20' -12' CMP 1" COPPER SERVICE ,c'WEE 6'WLE '?, REMOVE 20' -12' CMP F & 128 -15" CUP F & 1 28' -15' CMP 12'W LE SAN 4n _ g . JACK BORE 46 -18' 'b v sDb STEEL CASING 4 v . r s�GN� -- _.._. _ _.... ............... __ .... __ • °*' •e Ya SECTION LINE •° •D • �v IS' o • ° o P ° 6. •° 'o °$ °$ q, a YP J 111E or s.: SEE SHEET it _ - - 'o/ B,Eu _oGE a .... ... p 2 u_ ixv. 909 42 0 'ly ad ti v. smss ih F J sn � -L`- -� •° C° I I aan • I S ° 7Yi 1 - • Y °Jr✓ °J ° _ "o 4D_ 8" VALVE o%w -g ' , °c =auxo ip y i _ rOL'Nn ip AR2E 20'WLE 10'IREE �HWEC C %6nNL uo'J5. °' a I rOaNa '.a I ° 8 "X12 "TEE — Ul a/ %'° 'q s 12 " -2 BEND ��,' I 12' PLUG 12" VALVE 12'-22 BEND POWER POLES RELOCATED.' RESTORE GRAVEL BY OTHERS (TYP.) RESTORE BITUMINOUS REMOVE 8" PLUG AND CONNECT DRIVEWAY DRIVEWAY PROTECT STORM SEWER 8" VALVE TO EXISTING WATERMAIN OR REMOVE AND REPLACE TOVRIALLE RICHARD THOMPSON CHAUNCEY BARER GARDENS 18" CMP CULVERT RESTORE BITUMINOUS (INCIDENTAL) DRIVEWAY 0 20 Q ° vERT N f` O OI' fpV, • _ OI =. S 01 Oi S I Oi Oi Oi OiI 0.. O 915 m w R $ m m $ °m DA ° m ml 915 - - _ -__ A : .. 910 - _.. EXIS 910 STING IROFILE _- -- - - ... - _u .- _ _ -- 905 coNER 905 900 - — - - -- - - 900 -.... ..... .. : 0T -12'. PVC WATERMAIN L. I 895 895 8 90 _ _ 6_iJ "- A6U CA iAAY W W4H 090 -15 1 I I I 1 - -_ :- TO .DNE 1998 ' HLRE6Y UAUn l THAT mis rLAH. S ceicAnw. Na DAM Rr W.9CW 0[S Pn. 1326 ENERGY PARK DRIVE 91EEr j DESIGNED BY: a0R DATE: m W., RAC MIIIANI AY uE D, ~ AY a cT ST. PAUL. MINNESOTA 55108 CITY OF CENTERVILLE SAWARY SEWER, STORM SEWER AND WATERMAIN 1� RKM �nn9w AND TiArI AK A DULY RLOSWRLD (612) 644 -1389 DR 2600B9M AKN BY J08 NUMBER OrLS_ifNR V,=EH IOID R mE UWS tY mE AP CAD DATE' — ...ANE 1998 STAW ar rinxNE50u PARKVIEW ADD(T1ON CENTERVLLE ROAD PROVED: CAD FILE: 260089 -7 uArt REaNn. Howard R. Green Company C ONSULTING ENGINEERS 3iA 0+00 TO 3TA 5}00 1] CENTERVILLE ROAD (h „p „��� IXi9nx;u0Vff DEAN ANDERSON LAURIE LAMOTTE PARK JOHN & CINDY RIEDER ST. CENENEVE CHURCH • o LPL ♦ ° V ♦ y i } °A. J ♦ °° ° ♦may CMP _ ' fl lSP 5 WP VE? INV 90).60 NV, 9R)6 ♦ J .1 M _ _ _ i iNV. 90] 5' _ 907,51 1 LMP i J MB ' T —� �'- wpv ♦ •♦> : =`b= - Y♦ INV 908.03♦[ VE- y♦MV. 906 ♦r INV, 90]S9 I A 3� ____ ( .. . . ....... .. . .. .. __.... ... J ♦ ill ♦ RD PO51 _ __..- ..........- - •.. - -- .......... y ♦A SECTION LINE ♦g i2 - %8 - TEE °:+ EDLC O! Bit ° r ....... - _..-- -- _......._____ ........ Bpa __. ----.._.. yn._... _.. . g�_... 9 r 1 12 - VALVE 'g ... °. $ IAN MN ;. rr Ev o 3 cNnan Pc. a` $ sax Mn ♦$ 12 X12 - TEE ♦$ P . "q - - - -- - - - - -- 'be " ` $ Al , SEE SHEET 10 n B..An T An ].nn $ e ° Assn t2 22 • BEND SEE SHEET 12 ' -- II I ♦°� I � I � I I t I � I � I I —rt-lr I T I �- I ° � .,�:' _ � '�* BID ALTERNATIVE 1 CONSISTS OF s $° ♦ 4b CONSTRUCTING WATERMAIN FROM ♦ �b� iA STA. 9 +55 TO STA- 12 +31 DIRECTIONAL BORE 1” m COPPER SERVICE r n 12 - -2 BEND — _ _ — _ _ — — _ — 7 — — _ _ _ _ — _ _ . _ — _ \ IOU RMLLE SEE SHEET 8 SEE SHEET 3 a 20 � Nlt1 5 .• I O O tl n h - n - N LO m? �L3 q lV (O OI O b N n O O O O O O O O 6 O O O ^I O O O O P OI T OI C1 w w w O1 O1 N OI Of w T T w w P 915 - — - 915 910 E&S LNO350FILE -.__ - I -- - --- r 910 J I 905 - — -- - - I -.. - - 905 COVER -_ 0' -12' PVC WATERMAIN - - 895 R P SAN: SEAERI 895 -- -- I -.. 890 _890 r I - - -- - — -- - -- - -- I - _ _... :- I f 7 51 1 1 wleer L l FIAT FES I., 9 11t AICN, na- PAIE ex N[flsar LY SwIVnOx 1328 ENERGY PARE DRIVE s „E[i no DESIGNED By PEI J 13 OATE'. _ J UNE 1998 _ w XEIC ” s P,pAMD w w w m MY PPacf ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA 1]108 Cn OF CENTERMLLE SAWARY SEWER. STORM SEWER AND WATERMANJ RKM 280089M awE9wsw Am. THAT I w A our PLQ37EMD DRAM BY. J'JD NUMBEfl wCftS9(eLAL CXPnCEF .. .E LAxS Gt lxf 812 bAA -A]89 APPROVLO: - -- Cn0 OP TI:: m E 1998 sr +� aP MIXnE801A PARKVIEW ADDMON CENTERALLE ROAD EE CAD PILE: 260089 - DAM NE6 „a __ - I- lavv�d R. Green Company STA 5+00 TO STA 101-00 17 CO ENG CENTERVILLE ROAD D. k J. GREENWADT BERNARD HENRICH ROBERT BARE TT DIRECTIONAL BORE 1" COPPER SERVICE TREE o'wEE '0, 0` •� r- I.'RCES INV. 90591• 5 %C l (ALKR INV. 905.96 ^ `yF, `71 °� °• cuEwE e_ • 4l -� NV. 90699 9[111] ° �p� e : • • ♦ � •♦ INV q 1 NV 9066 ♦ p �� O O' a JA ' J SELPON LINE $ ♦�G ♦ °i j ♦ ° D B C \ .. .. .. ... . .. F t Or ... ....... ....... .... .- ....... _ ... • _ G9AKt� :f RIB r J Q'r( 51G SAN u! 'g All •$, wv 900.9 - y$ +1 w .q, -- - - - -- SEE SHEET it o o r t F o PERT q _____N yal 0, 12" -22W BEND BID ALTERNATIVE 1 CONSISTS OF ♦4i ¢ '' 4 _ CONSTRUCTING WATERMAIN FROM lb �' 4" p� Z •j� +� ♦$ n - - -__. -___. _ __ °� STA. 9 +55 TO STA. 12 +31 % 12-2 BEND 12" PLUG + 6"�LEAD� POWER POLE RELOCATED BY OTHERS 72 " %6" TEE DART N1lL I 0 20 vERI, 5 g a o o m 915 of 910 - -- — -- - -- -- — - -- - - - -- -- - -910 .. EMSRN 3 PROFILE _ 905 - - - - - -- - - -- -. -- _ - - - -- 1 905.. 900 E _- i 895 895 23l -tY P WATERMAIN :- 890 890 } 1 NERgx CExisv iNAi nN5 RAN, gEf61t,ATd. M0. OAl[ gr REN4CN DENAia11CN I326 ENERGY PMN DRIK SxEEi N0. DEDONED BY: PB JOB DATE: _ NNE 1999 w REMRr SAS M IN wE w Urea NT WA[ l ST. PAUL. 11PINESOTA 55108 AJ89 CITY OF CENTERVILLE 3ANfrARY SEWER, STORM SEWER AND WATERMAIN 12 RRN 260089M swERNSd .NO ler9r 1 v(9 var R[asrta[o _ (912) 64A - DRAWN E NUMDER mtr(59dA1 [xpN[[n uNO[a w[ IAwS w wE APPR0 CAD DATE NNE 1999 srA!E a V1NMSw9 PARKVIEW ADDff10N CENTERVILLE ROAD : - -- : a CAD FILE: 260089 -9 09R REN.. I- lauvard R. Green Company STA. 10}00 TO M 12 +3125 CONSULTING ENGINEERS 17 SEE SHEET 9 PARK TRAIL I 27 \ / CONSTRUCT 8' BIT PATH r / EMERGENCY OVERFLOW 907.50 � r B L--------------------- -- — — — — — — — - T.----- - — — — — — 40* 12" CM m /FI.AHFD ENDS 0 20 N n. —g ➢5. 4. S. Inv. 905. ;0 _ -- -- - -_ 1 r v�Rr._ i 920 _ — 920 v r 915 — - -.-- - -- - - -- - i 915 910 - — - : I -- - - 9 . 10 _ - PR 905— _ ' 907.50 0 STA. 2 +90 - - - -. 900 I _ - j - -- - i _ _ 2 _ P Ka9r c[a *rr vt.w, sv[anunp+. no oAIE 6r q[M9M CESCAmnOx 1726 ENERGY PARK DRIVE Df9GNED 0Y: JOB DALE: MAY 1998 m tt 9 r s 0 .an er .[ a uwm ur px[n 9T. PAOI, uINNE50TA 55106 CffY OF CENTERVILLE SANITARY SEWER, STORM SEWER AND WATERMAIN 13 pP[RM9M MO .nt.NI ^ IXM1Y flCpSRF[lr DRAM BY: RKM JOB NUMBER 260089M m[.k Expx[E^ VMX- 1 E [Aws � 1v[ APPROVED: — AD DATE: Y (fi12) fi1K —A]89 APPRO - -- C NA 1998 +' ^R x�xxESal. PARKVIEW ADDMON PARK TRAIL a CAD TILE: 26069 -10 . -..- Howard R. Green Company STA 0}00 TO STA 3 +88 w: NEC ro. CONSUL ENG 17 - -- - - - ---- -------- - - - -- -- - - - -- - ALL ANCHOR BOLTS. NUTS j4-3/8-XV " A. HOT- DIPPED GALV. SEAL AFTER DROP IS COMPLETE GROUT BOTTOM TO SLOPE TOWARD AND WASHERS TO BE ' -0" O.C.- MIN. 2 PIPE AS SHOWN BY ARROWS NEENAH CASTING R -1733 OR EQUAL STAINLESS STEEL PER TO MH PATH 2" SCREENED GOOSENECK VENT MNOOT SPEC. 3312 ANCHOR BOLT$ POH HOLES HAVE TWO CONCE A LEO D. SHORT BODY TEE NEENAH CASO R -1733 OR EQUAL COVEVE R SHALL _ SLnB SHALL BE CONCRETE COLLAR E NEENAH CASTING R -1]58- NEENAH CASTING R -1]33 Oft EWAL COVER SHALL COLLAR WO SCONCEALED CONCRETE \ . CRETE% TOPE II (FROST RETARDANT CASTING) PICK H OR EQUAL CL 52 DIP RISER PIPE HAVE TWO CO CONCRETE NCEALED I FLOW I ADJURE TIE ADJUSTING RINGS CONC. BLOCK $PACER PICK HOLES. ADJUSTING RINGS MINIMUM 2 R S MINIMUM 2 RINGS MA %IMUM 6 RIN ING$ CONCRETE MAXIMUM 6 RINGS ADJUSTNG RINGS n- -A 1 I 2] ( ' MINIMUM 2 RINGS - MAXIMUM 6 RINGS �l( STEPS AS PER 18• CONCRETE COLLAR — GI mErIFIr ATION S 27 SECTION A —A ~' lNCRETE Cq.LAR ECCENTRIC CONE wALLS i0 BE STEPS AS PER <e" SPEC $IEEI iRANST10N COUPLER 1 X 1/4 STEEL CL 52 DI, P REDWOOD SECTION A - Cpry STR'JC SECTIONS A PRECAST SECTI$ 1 /2' SHUT OFF VALVE PIPE CP . FROM TEE BLOCK < NTH CX4 JOINTS QUICK DISCONNECT WALLS TO BE TO UN015NRBE0 SOR � - - ECCENTRIC CONE COUPLING CONSTRUCTED OF MJ -PE DIP GS /8" INSERTS BACK FLUSHING WETHC CX4 Sj100jH 5 N?SSIAAINHOSE STEPS AS PER VARIES AIR k VACUUM VALVE SPECIFICATIONS (APCO MODEL 400) DETAIL A M INVERT SHALL A STEPS AS PER -WALLS TO BE CONSTRUCTED OF BE SLOPED TO PRONOE 1' BLOW OFF VALVE SEE DETAIL "B SPECIFICATIONS 7 PRECAST SECTIONS NTH EX w SMOOTH FLOW FROM // d JOINTS < I INLET t0 OUTLET. 2" SHUT OFF VALVE F OW A SPEOFlCANONS A ���\�\\ BUN D FLANGE �A UNDISTURBED PIPE CLAMPS EVERY 12' em SOIL < SEE DETAIL ' A' INSTALL PVC CUT < 1 _ 24 COMPACTED IN HALF 10 a 1 - - - 1 GRANULER FILL MAINTAIN FLOW INVERT SHALL BE HALF BLIND INTEGRAL BASE MONCLI PRECAST DROP IHIC �� FLANGE A A INL SUUO BA SE ON •' ��/ • CRUSHED ROCK \\% 4 d A ' FIL A q,E NOW£: MJ -PE / �`NgNHOLE INVERT SMALL MANN FL W 1 90 ELBOW ~ N1T11 -MI 1' OP 0 ' BEN /BE SLOPED TO PROVIDE 5• e ! SLOPED TO PROVIDE SMOOTH THIS TYPO MANHOLE SHALL BE USED MANHOLE SLAB SHALL BE CRETEX TYPE II /��\ GROUT l FLOW FROM INLET TO OUTLET SMOOTH FLOW FROM TEE DEPTH OEP SS TORN W GROUT INLET TO OUTLET • DETAIL B I" MIN, INTEGRAL BASE STANDARD AIR RELIEF MANHOLE OUTSIDE DROP MANHOLE INSIDE DROP MANHOLE INSIDE DROP MANHOLE (TWO FEET OR LESS) SLAB TOP MANHOLE GROUT BOTTOM TO SLOPE TOWARD PIPE AS SHOWN BY ARROWS NEENAH CASTING R -1733 PROPERTY LINE OR EQUAL. COVER SHALL HAVE TWO CONCEALED PICK HOLES 1 / BT SUITABLE MATERIAL F SERVICE MARKER ADAJS TE 4' OR fi AS SPECIFIED - ADNSTINL RINGS I I� MINIMUM Z RINGS SEWER MAIN J V 1 TEE OR WYE A$ SPECIFIED MAXIMUM 6 RINGS E H • / 6 OR 1/4 Bc WHICHEVER _ 7 I$ LARGER (12 MAXIMUM) 6 O O D Y PLVC PROPERiv LINE ZY • I 6 "I O O O ° SEGT IQN— A-=A O O O SERVICE MARKER ' SPRING LINE 1 O 0 O SERVICE PIPE ORIGINAL GROUND O O O 45 BEND ECCENTRIC CONE O O 13 MIN. SLOPE "' 1 O O �FQ' 45° BEND 5' THIS SECTION OF PIPE PLUG 4 OR BC /8 WHICHEVER NATURAL GROUND ON UNDISTURBED SOIL STEPS AS PER WALLS TO BE CONSTRUCTED OF IS LARGER — < " OR 6" AS SPECIFIED SPECIFICATIONS PRECAST SECTIONS W.M CXI 45 BEND )DIN TS 0.063" THICK ALUMINUM SIGN. BLACK GRANULAR BEDDING LETTERS ON WHITE HIGH INTENSITY I GRANULAR BEDDING SEWER MAIN REFLECTg212E0 BACKGROUND. 45° BEND 19. M IN. S LOPE m U- CHANNEL POST, MINIMUM 3 L0./FT. GEE OR WYE AS SPECIFIED a I i 6' -6" LONG, PAINTED GREEN. � SEWER MAIN VARIES A A PLACED AS DIRECTED BY CITY, NOTE: GRANULAR BEDDING SHALL BE ` - - -� PAID FOR PER CUBIC YARD. TO BE USED AS SERVICE CONNECTIONS ON DEEP LINES O1• MIN FL w wTECRAL ASE STRUCTURE MARKER SIGNS CLASS B PIPE BEDDING SERVICE RISER SECTION TYPICAL HOUSE SERVICE STANDARD MANHOLE PB 11R.Y c1Rr l THAI nlls ft.. mloIH Arox. ro. DArt 6Y BExsIHm DE$CFPnGN 1326 ENERGY PART[ DRIVE vlL[I Na APPROVED DESIGNED BY: JOB DATE: .A1N 1998 w N[KPT •AS FIIEPAFID er uE w VNDEA ur dxcr ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA 55108 DRAWN BY: REM SINEMxAM M THAT. nu A WLY REPSn[ ED _ JOB NUMBER 2SM89M ma[wwa Fndrv[ER MNDCR Iw[ uxs a THE -- (812) 811 - 089 CITY OF CENTERVILLE �4 V: -- -_CAD DATE.: __ JUNE 1996_ STArz a MINNESOTA. rv� SANITARY SEWER DETAILS CAD FI E, 26008, -5 V -- He rd R. Green Company PARKVIEW ADDITION a INK BEdN.. CONSULTING ENGINEERS 1 ------- - - - - -- -- RIP -RAP 12 --- -- STANDARD CASTING GROUTED IN PLACE - 2 CONCRETE ADJUSTING RINGS - EXTERNAL MVI SEAL MINIMUM 2 RINGS O I CONCRETE SLAB MAXIMUM 6 RINGS CREIEX iWE 11 / GROUTED IN PLACE OR EQUAL / 2' CONCRETE STANDARD CASTING ADJUSTING RINGS $ECTION B -0 ® ® ® ®® MINIMUM 2 RINGS EXTERNAL MH SEAL ® ® ® ®� ® MAXIMUM 6 RINGS ®ee®�.e B 4 B ®® ® ® z v �a STEPS WALLS TO BE CONSTRUCTED SPECIFI I 27 ' A A �A !� OF PRECAST SECTIONS OR SECTION A -A _� o GOING. SEWER BLOCK. SEWER p• • P051nONING LUG 15 GO R M g VARIABLE o BLOCK SHALL BE PLASTERED --[ - NOT REQUIRED 1 1 ON INTERIOR AND EXTERIOR. PRECAST ECCENTRIC CONE SOLID LID WITH TWK) CONCEALED PION HOLES 4 8 25 3/4 • PRECAST CONCRETE SD USE EQU1v. 0 FOR PIPE ARCH 25 3Z4 Z /8 OFFSET NOTE: STEPS AROUND P LAN PIPE MAXIMUM DISTANCE A m _L RIP -RAP SHALL BE INSTALLED FROM FLOOR TO BOTTOM 16 4 D STEP TO PROVIDE EASY REMOVAL OF I _ 24 1/8• - I CONCRETE SLAB - PRECAST OR BLOCK TRASH GUARD. + r RIP -RAP A I CRETE% TYPE II q2 EOVAL Ze 1/2 _ STORED FLOOR SHALL BE -y _ _I SLOPED TO INLET PROYOC S MOOTH FLOW FROM OUTLE O & I I I 35 1/2' I INLET T QUTLEi. 3• CASING SHALL BE nEENAH 9-1233 OR EWAL 3 NOTE: MANHOLE FLOOR SHALL O 6 SLOPED TO PROVIDE SMOOTH -- T CASRNCS SHALL BE NEENAH R -2561a OR EQUAL 'E MANHOLE SHALL DE USED FLOW FROM 1rvLEt TO OULET WiE . h 5 -4 WHEN SPE OR WEN THE MANHOLE LESS DEPTH IS LESS R1pN EIGHT FEET. L CONCRETE EQUAL RE @x SECTION A -A ' HYPE II OR EQUAL RIP —RAP INSTALLATION BEEHIVE CASTING STANDARD MANHOLE CASTING SLAB TOP MANHOLE STANDARD MANHOLE WRE MESH REINFORCEMENT GEOTEXTILE FABRIC PIPE THREAD POST SPACING -SEE NOTE SIZE DIAMETER FABRIC ANCHORAGE FRENCH. 12 BACKFILL W11H TAMPED '/ 19 5 /B . • ' . 3 NATURAL SOIL REMOVE CAP SCREWS EXTERNAL CR SEAL ROLLED THREADS 2 MAX. 3 MAX. FROM CURB BOX WHEN CASTING 21 (SEE NOTE 4) CONCRETE HAS SET EYE 24 t T i 6' MIN. BOLT 2T I 32 (AOJ. 11 II2 MIN. _ I RUNS N FLOW - JO CANOPY TIE ~ AD.IUSRHGRNGS- 2 CONCRETE 33 - L MINIMUM 2 RINGS ET'E 36 MAXIMUM 6 RINGS BO T 42 3/4 40 CUT OR ROLLED 6 MIN. e• 54 60 - WALLS TO BE CONSTRUCTED W 66 p MAX, MAX NOTE: SILT FENCE DETAIL SECTIONS OR CONCRETE ' 1, SILT FENCES CONSTRUCTED WIN SUPPORT FENCES. POSTS SHALL BE � 5< 24' X J6� PRECAST SEC SEWER BLOCK. BLOCK SHALL BE 3/4• STEEL BARS - TRANSVERSE 28 r t SPACED AT 10 OR LESS, AND DRIVEN VEN AT LEAST 2• INTO THE GROUND. PLASTERED ON INTERIOR AND AND LONGITUDINAL. WELD EACH 32'1 AS REQUIRED 2. SILT FENCES CONSTRUCTED WITHOUT SUPPORT FENCES, POST SHALL BE EXTERIOR, INTERSECTION 90 I 1 FOR ACCEPTABLE JOINT SPACED AT 4' OR LESS, AND DRIVEN AT LEAST 3' INTO THE GROUND. 9fi CLL OR ROLLED 102 U BOLT TIE DALES PLACED ON -� LOB MINE OR WIRE EDGE, BUTTED TI 2 TIGHT �� PLA 120 132 WELDED EYE OR APPROVED EQUAL A A POINT A MUST BE Jfi 1/Z _ 60° 60° 60° 60° HIGHER THAN PONT B B 85 R EACH BALE SANDEEMBEDDEIDF 35 1/4 ��I CuftO� 0% ADJUSTABLE 6" S IN GROUND 10• MINIMUM. T f� • 2 MAX.- 2- 1' EARTH FILL STO. 1.13 LES. PER FT. 6• 19 } 4 -- IS'� — �3h — 4 N2 T i "'111 DIg2 e I 32' (ADJ. 21 1/2' I METAL FENCE POST - 6'LONG ROUND PIPE ARCH PIPE SNOW • SNOW r �� - FENCE FENCE _ 4 MINIMUM PRECAST BASED IN PLACE DR 7 EDGE OF EYE BOLT TIE $PAC FOR -[ _ FLARED 7ENUSEGnON OUTSIDE JOINT Ott: ALE DITCH CHECK I 33 1 15 1/2 — I. HOLES SHALL BE CAST -In OR GRILLED lfi" FLO X [23ADE SPAOHG FLOW 3 1 3 6 • I ��23, I6• I6' FROM OuT90E EDGE of JgrvT. = Zx_ IOp —+ f' "�� '__ I_ ^^^ ^V AW WASH ARE NOT REP RE ON D II 4% TS 43 ]I 2, NUTS WASHERS MSIDE OF PIPE WM 2Y DIAMETER OR LESS. STAKE 6S —Sir_ STAKE J. TES ARE NOT REWIRED FOR BELL PIPE Y — Bx 40 AND SMALLER, ON OTHER MZES, TC MAY L _ ]5_ NOTE'. BE INSERTED FROM ASIDE. OPT CR 1 f OPTION 2 TAPERED HOLES PERMITTED I I Of STEEL WI SHALL IC HAM W A SINGLE UHF. ELE YATION WHEN PRECAST 4. CUT THREADS MAY BE USED IF WASHER AND OF STEEL WIRE FABRIC HAVING R AREA OF NUT ME USED. BALE HAY OR STRAW DITCH CHECK CASTINGS SHALL BE NEENAN R- ]O6J -V OR EQUAL NOT LESS THAN 0.17 60. IN. PER FOOT OF HEIGHT. PLACEMENT OF HOLES 5. PIPE SZE9 LI E EQUIVALENT INSIDE DIAMETER W TO BE USED WITH SNOW FENCE O T SHOWN ON PLAN SHEETS, ROUND RNO PE OR OR EWIVALENL gAMEIER OF A WITH OR WITHOUT SNOW SHOW FE FENCE CE 1H AT OER LOCATIONS AS P�'Ng DIRECTED TO BE UIRELFED SE BY THE ENGINEER. TRASH GUARD CONCRETE PIPE JOINT TIES EROSION CONTROL DETAIL STANDARD INLET CASTING SHALLOW CATCH BASIN ✓JNE 1998 rIER[er q 5 Hnxt 1 YCGFIC no. oArt BY RCNSM IxswlRnlxH 1426 ENERGY SOTA DRIVE —' L�FL1 no DESIGNED By PS .`JOR OA'E: Iv RDVHr ns RSRARD er MEIN em6e yr aacr 5T. PAUL. MINNESOTA 5510a sJttnxsa+.RO nHAr w A uAr RmsrtRF° ) CffY OF CENTERVILLE 1 r J RAN 0069M (612 6p -4}69 DRAWN BY'. JOB NUMBER _ 26 UNIAR WU LnRIKFR U-IXA H[ Ll S IX tart STORM SEWER DETAILS APPROVED: ___ -_CAD ❑AlE'.._• 1998 (�� SIT �n a CAD FILE: 260 -SM 1 NVVG'!Id R. Geen Corn Iy PARKMEW AMMON 17 De1[ -- REI:.ND. CONSUL E fro A SURMOUNTABLE B—I SURMOUNTABLE A CURB AND GUTTER CURB AND GUTTER 4 ROAD Y •�+' EDGE BITUMINOUS DRIVEWAY O � PAVEMENT Y q • L •' 1 1 • • , E - J EDGE GRAVEL 12' MINIMUM E%PAN90N JOINT • SHOULDER 1/2 EXPANSION BEGIN TRANS. TO TYPE BJ FRAME. GRATE AND CURB CMATCH S - JOINT 6616 CURB AND CUTTER DIRECTION OF FLOW BOX: NEENAH R- 3062-V, T FRAME TIPPED TO MATCH - , ESS S -330 HIS OR EQUAL 15 CRE APRON ° STREET GRADE PROFILE 2U OR SE " PLAN 16' CDNWACDON . •' I ]' -0' ]' -O' r 36 / T DEPRESSED CURB-y 3" RADIUS 1/Y R4DUS DESIGN GUTTER UNE GRADE PAVED DRIVEWAY ENTRANCE J' ROAD 3 RADIUS 4 1/2 1 JOINT 1 # EXP, JOINT G EDGE BITUMINOUS 25' 25 ' PLAN I/2' RADIUS OPENING PAVEMENT SLOPE 3/4' PER FT 3 ©- CUTTER FLOW LINE *WHEN BASE OF FRAME IS LEVEL TRANSVERSELY, 2 1' SUMP FROM FLOWLINE RESULTS J 1r 2 EDGE GRAVEL J' t' MINIMUM 3' • _ SECTION A -A SHOULDER i I I I I I ] 11• FRONT TOP EDGE OF FRAME IS GRAVEL EA - 5 1/¢ I -' I a FRONT TOP EDGE OF GUTTER I GRAVEL BASE 3/4" LIP 1 VA TES j 2• II- TAPER TO MATCH EXISTING AT R/W }T I T GRAVEL DRIVEWAY ENTRANCE GUTTER LINE • E %P, JOINT •• 6' EXP. JOINT I q ROAD ELEVATION SECTION C -C CUT SECTION 0.5' 18 PLAN RIM ELEVATION 6' VAR USE 6:1 SIDE SLOPES CU T CUT MATCH EDGE OF CUTTER II BACK CU C i 4' MINIMUM NON - SHRINK MORTAR 1_-- 11• 3/4" R15E MEETING CORPS OF 6" _ MIN. SLOPE - 8E ENGINEERS SPEC. 4 ROAD APPROACH - 50'(25' MIN.) MP % SLOPE 1JE CRD -C -621 REWIRED �, 2•_D• FARM ENTRANCE - 23'(15' MIN.) 4 ROaD + fi S GONG. RESIDENTIAL IF SHIMS USES, S. NCE $H ARE S 1 FIELD ENTRAIN - 15" Mlrv. • ° 8' GONG. COMMERCIAL ADJUSTING RINGS 2 -MIN., 5 -MAX COAT RINGS, OPENINGS, AND RINGS AN MIN. 3 /e" BED OF MORTAR BETWEEN I LVERT IF NECESSARY ALL CUT EDGES WITH LATEX D PLASTER EXTERIOR ONLY CV Vz' E %P ANSIGN JOINT PRIMER /SEALER-- HYDROZO NTH 4' THICK COAT Sa 40 OR APPROVED SECTION B -B FILL SECTION CROSS SEC iION CURB AND GUTTER SECTION CATCH BASIN FRAME PLACEMENT RURAL DRIVEWAY ENTRANCE DEPRESSED CURB WITH DRIVEWAY APRON CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER 8618 SURMOUNTABLE CURB AND GUTTER _ DESIGN 00 A � 0618 CURB 2" 8618 CURB WIDTH OF WALK A ANQ CUTTER , B--I AND GVITIR n - -- - -- - J MI ��J -- ACCORDANCE IRTH • ' p / LOCAL POST WASTERS ° • •'• •, , • 'JN ,1 s PROPOSED - REQUIREMENTS t • /// — BEGIN TRANS. 0 W / STREET BEGIN TRAS. TO TYPE BJ FRAME, ORATE AND CURB / 6 CURB AND CUTTER pIRECllON OF FLOW BOX: NEE: R- 3062 -V CUTTER FLOW LINE FRAME TPPED TO MATCH STREET GRADE PROFILE 5'O• 5'0 PLAN 4'-D" 36' M. 36 1 2' 36' MIN. A FACE OF CURB \ — T 1 ' N a @ TOP OF FRAME �� i `Mlll 4' ODE < \P OESCN GUTTER MATCHES TOP ROUND ALL SLOPED INTERSECTIONS LINE MADE— I OF CURB APPftO%, 10:1 SLOPE rr ll ll +r J' P m -LL I/2 •, �� q *MEN BASE OF FRAME LI LEVEL TRANSVERSELY. 318' SUMP FROM PLO % RESULTS E %P. JOINT EXP. JOINT ]_4 PAVE WEAR COURSE 10 1/2' 1 2 1/: . (FOR 8616 CURB 6: CUTTER) SECTION A -A MIN. 4'00E 28 EXPOSED AGGREGATE MILL 1•DEEP PLAN RIM E OF N 6 C • CURB AND GUTTER F MATCH EDGE OF CUTTER LALIER EACH OF CURB NON - SHRINK MORTAR 4 ENGINEERS 11' EL CORPS OF 6" ENCNEERS SPEC. CONCRETE WALK CRS -0-621 REQUIRED �, 2•_0' -� SECTION A - IF 5111M5 ARE USED. I — Ex. STREET $F.CPON SEE SPECIFICATIONS. $TRaIGHi LME SAwCUi EDGE OF SHLULAER COAT ADJUSTING RINGS 2 -MIN., 5 -MAX, I SURFACE TREATMENT - AFTER NORMAL CONCRETE FINISHING, EMBED EX. BIT. FOR REMOVAL ALL CUT T EDGES Q D OPENINGS AND GES WITH LATEX MIN, E 0E BETWEEN AGGREGATE, MEETING THE REQUIREMENTS RILL 1 OF SPEC. J 10 PROPOSED WEAR COURSE. PRIMER R--HYDROZO RINGS AND PLASTER EXTERIOR ONLY MODIFIED i0 10 OF THE MATERIAL 1/2' 2" J /e' IN SIZE. ZE. IN IN THE BASE COURSE AND ND AGGREGATE BASE S 40 OR BED R LAKE 40 OR APPROVED B- THICK COAT GREEN CONCRETE. THE EMBEDDED AGGREGATE E SHALL OE AT B -B EOUgL. SECTION LEAST J /T6 ABOVE THE CO NCRETE SURFACE. THE E EXP POSED RI AGGREGATE MAY BE LIGHTLY RINSED TO WASH MORTAR OFF OF IT. MAIL BOX CATCH BASIN FRAME PLACEMENT PEDESTRIAN CURB RAMPS MATCH EXISTING BITUMINUOUS SURFACING SURMOUNTABLE CONCRETE CURB AND CUTTER 8618 CURB AND GUTTER PB K", MIT' %H l .111... aEUnrwna, Na DATE 01 REWax c[sCRN11o 1326 ENERGY PARK DRIVE I O�SfGYED 0Y JOB CAT. JUNE 1998 aq q[RXr qx9 grgvuEn 8� uE W NM%n xr pgYll — Sl, PAUL, YINNESQG ]]108 .IMREOSRV., DRAWN RY: RKM —JOB NUMBER 269M - (612) 644 -4389 CITY OF CENTEROLLE og9FE59M1L EHOM1ECq uxpEF 1E L.1M C! lxE APPROVED: ___CAD DATE : - -- cao EILE: - 26poe9 sr - . - -- - -._ " _ — _ k7L/V2r(� R. La'e2(1 CO(pp2(ly PARKVIEW ADDITION STREET CONSiAUC DET IL3 - CONSULTING E NGINEE RS 17 NWZLE SEC ➢ON PROPERTY LINE MERAnn6 BUT I' PENTAODN Z I/T HOSE CCNNEC ION (THREAD 9ZE J 1/16 O.D, 11 /T iv I) F STREET • I/3 PUMPER CCNNEC,cN (THNEnD 2" % 4' WOOD MARKER SIZE 5 9/16' OD., 4' TIP.) e< SUITABLE MATERIAL - _ NUT CAP [ S ERMCE TYPE MTN CNAWS W US PUMPER NOIRE C' CURB BOX AND STOP W n I" E T ACM TO PROPERTY LINE OPERA,, u1S CURB BOX ANO STOP CURB BOX TO PROPERTY LINE NOMINAL GROUND LINE AND STOP PROPERTY LINE E 9 .5 Bc NATURAL GROUND 1_ E / VALVE B B' CROSS 1 STANDPIPE CONCRETE BRICK WAiERMAII THE BOTTOM OF THE TRENCH SHALL BE SHAPED I2 I ! TO FIT THE PIPE BARREL FOR AT LEAST 50% —` OF THE OUTSIDE DIAMETER. THE REMAINDER OF rlEE BO11pA B I LOOP PROMDE O ERVICE 0' HORIZONTAL THE PIPE 15 SURROUNDED TO A HEIGHT OF AT ALVE VALVE MATERIALS, LEAST 6' ABOVE ITS TOP BY SELECT FILL MATERIALS, PLACED BY HAND TOOLS AND COMPACTED TO COMPLETELY FILL ALL SPACES UNDER AND ADJACENT TO THE PIPE. CORPORATION COCK E PROP ERTY L INE ANT I • T S SERVICE PIPE )/9 ROUND HOLES NOT, ^ WATERMAIN I. 15 RREMOTF SECTION 1. LEFT RAND OPERATING NUT (1 Vx' POINT To FLAT) PLAN J. PMNI BARREL SECTOR RED TO CRAM •. GRIN RO ES S4 L BE RVCQO 1N rnpl QFXPRI WATER Ch1OITM5 NOTE: AS DIRECIED BY THE ENONEER. WATER SERVI N ION$ SH AII. BE F %TENDED 5 PUMPER NOZZLE OF N10RnN 15 WIN PLUGGER DRnIwIOLES SHkI BE PAINED BLUE. 10 FEET PAST T T HE PROPERTY ERTY RTY LINE ' 6. HYDRANT ,LAGS SHALL BE FURNISHED AND INSTALLED W TN HYDRANT. CLASS C PIPE BEDDING TYPICAL WATER LAYOUT PACER HYDRANT DETAIL TYPICAL SERVICE DETAIL EDGE OF MAY OR BACK OF CURB Bc SUITABLE MATERIAL {' -0' I 2' -0' MINIMUM DOVER AS REQUIRED 9 FIRE "M AI IN Qe L ONE LENGTH OF WATERMN SPECIFICATIONS OR AS SHOWN / COMPACTED TRENCH ON PLANS. BACKFIII � PIPE M THE APPROPRIATE 6' DR 1/4 SIC WHICHEVER MATERIAL ADAPTORS. CENTER IS LARGER (11 MAXIMUM) AT CROSSINGS. -'� 24' 0.0 24' GATE VALVE WITH - \ y / er // / PROPOSEp SEWER MECHANICAL JOINT "`III � " SPRING LNlE / - COMPACTED SAND TEE AND VALVE BOX - -. —_ 2 RO OAM '� M \ NSVLA 11U IN. 2 5 MIN - L Y /A /� / / /� BENDS AS I OSEO WATERMAIN - - -- -- - RECURRED DS F O OR Bc /8 WHICHEVER NATURAL GROUND WATERMAIN STYROFOAM IS LARGER INSULATION WAT ERMAIN INSTALLATION UNDER SANITARY OR STORM SEWER GRANULAR BEDDING EXISTING SOIL SAND CUSHIOr1 WATERMAIN 'MiN SEE iYPICAI 4 COMPACTED SELECTED CENTER ONE JAY TRANSI➢ON i0 SPECIFIED MECHANICAL JOINT TEE HYDRANT GRANULAR MATERIAL OF WATERMAI VEPTH (TYP ) INSTALL FOR 517E FIRE HYURANT DE FAIL CROSSING -- VETICAL REND AS REOUIPEO- LINE AS REOUIREO JOINT RESTRAINING COUPLING -TWO NOTE: ALL COSTS OF EXCAVATION BELOW NOTE- WATERMAIN PIPE SHALL BE INSULATED 3/4' ALL THREAD RODS - -- GRADE AND PLACEMENT OF GRANULAR WHEN COVER IS LESS MAN 7.5 FEET BEDDING SHALL BE INCIDENTAL. POSSIBLE CONTINUOUS ROD - CONTRACTOR'S OPTION NOTE, RETAINED GLANDS MAY BE USED IN PLACE OF HOLDING CLASS 8 PIPE BEDDING PIPE INSULATION DETAIL WATERMAIN CROSSING RESTRAINING DETAIL 1 HLRUAl CER111 BRAT MI5 PIAN. YC[RKnR(N, NO DATE I BY I RENACM DESCPoPTM 1336 ENERGY PARK DRIVE A1EET NO DESIGNED BY. P JOB DATE: _ TUNE 1998 OR XUBC, As NXAR`ED RT BE UR UN�1 vT 9RERI - ST. PAUL. MINNESOTA 55108 FIRM �RERM4M WO THAT I AM A pUIY FICSTINEO _ (612) 6444389 CITY OF CENTERVILLE 17 DRAWN BY JOB NUMBER OUTCANAt ".It" UNXR 11 'AK U Ill WATERMAIN DETAILS APPBOKO'. - ._,CAD DATE _ ODNE 1990 STUE (Y wNNETarA. OF Cnu F1LC. 16 0089 -w --- .-- --- - -._._ — — f �O'✓VBfC� R. C een Company PARKAEW AMMON 17 -- - lulE�_ BECRD ___- -- - - CONSULTING ENGINEERS PA R K VIE W City Coun of n oka Ce County of Anoka e C le� e. se°nm v. 1­1" .L °n9. ..I I N S leas Wpn , pr m. Nat .: ,a a F., _ r .� _ , °e °u I, v°ae °,m °1 x] Secn°n F I°vnq p ] °:. °n9< Zx i al ,n< 1°u1Bw<a1 W°rl<. °I seellm x], i°v,..ary ]1, °n9e 32 n unpin [° rum r 598'.0'nTE n ntmu cnl 31 R31 u u. s] ___I_ S86'40'0TE 1060.91 - -- _ - .m., p' 1 -11- at n:. R21,1' Enn tii cp 3 -11- 11. 11 I -__- _ I � r s2De -BO � r S -� z� _9eza- -.° a'laor f^ r " n3.o° _____ 7 iI ;If -ass f -9;.D -; r � p. - f .n „- � 16ae - -� S z<.e..5 O I z e s5 __ z s � l \ „ 5 _ I w o \'m ♦ g>b / c x511s, f l °Ih \ ' i 8 r s n 7 s I \a r *- Sot Ss'E ze o t I^ 33 588'40'07wE ee 6 e 255.02 L z l/ s T JL s¢.] e_3 'S.or ]. • t , '�a sn °c. z] 6 3n / SEew U]c I:eE w B 4 U9']. ".' C__ YB 09 <8S1] 54 'F/ o ko "' ME LANE � V Z 508'400] "E � M 60 SB. p6']."E � 6° • NJ)Z9'2fi E_� � 9LIx- 92.00- I l�r l I lr �(- axsl_l`I BB'°]'.9'E _•p'S r _I..m -- P±os5 2 9 ° ____PO -zs 32e w'oa0'a e s.' ). s .ti z' l5zx] r) s 5 i zzvz'es .°2.41 >°� ° L_. .sl'f� Itti N ° e 144°i__ 0]1 ¢'E_�LO rv¢4"]0'2EE_1.Q Fu°i c)t o 4 sea low'El tsae - lo m"E r e Ie Z4 0� 3I tssE- - 1a1 .z .. _ . SSs 40 e0']8't °^ 6 l ° o - o m O _ ?el5t_J4 C m 23 m' O F _ _ n i U ilk. p 1 _ at lea.l ___ w _ Lit IC -:`] u '^ n� c 10 ' %° 9i° - 6 - xatll.or -r `_ �s3.ev a __ L- "sleas� _ `,'` 3 H O. o5 �i W 3 _se]s S44tN z n `: GRAPH SCALE 7 19 o `s _ E S..3J a N J V O k S9 5 B n m O lm z° L :5eq p _ v0 U 8 9 4 6],2e L 144 J _6_° 3i 3] -NB] ]]'E W 3]35 INi88'I - 2 1 46 °4'l0 ? o F ~ 588']902 "E.j4 ` '.546E - W m :5466 ] _ _� n, _ Se]'S1 ]4-01 e ` f i 1 uch f00 K °aG I, !a o' 5 sn i MEADOW CIRCLE g 8y n•sJVlar 25 scg p O t JOE v 6 , . 06']a"J2f n N0929) .__ ° ?- w, .49 -91 ae 114> r. + �\QC n ti9, �� tB� ] s ee 41]31 �' ap 4g r5r�, J ° FOR IHE PURPOSES OF M PCT, THE NOR]H LINE TH ,_� 7 w mlr I�sz54 r u. ,n a re,]�io. 1 <6 o's' b i WI All .c, 1 rc 5 12�'" : ° f e e + ry / � \ c OF E SOUTF!WEST O(/ARi ER OF SfRION 2J 14 is 1 6 a t7 z. ���� 0 26 r 27 ��: 6 - .2eryn \\ a 1 is A65UMEO TO eFiR seaaoarE o \\� •� is ♦ z h .r, i I3 V U / I e 1£ z no, 1. DENOTES AN ANOKA COUNTY MONUMENT E y n aji\ / ,6 S98']9'aZ "E \\ oLSa- sz9J-- �`-ns2 sa.00 I_. y Qi 9O.an -4355 IB1.91 / ------ DENOTES • DENOTES FOUND IRON MONUMENT - -- ° N88 - 39'02W 1315.85 - -- DEN17@S 1/2' IRON PIPE SET AND - o Im ° .11" xpnn ry p' m. a :I I..'s, .1 e, S , °� °n °, MARKED BY R.L.S. REGISTRATION NO. 15612 s..I.- 2. T....on ]I� u -1- 22 !l r a t - T r - r, n -p —p- DENOTES RIGHT OF ACCESS DEDICATED L_ I V I L_ ~'� I I �� �` �� TO THE COUNTY OF ANOKA DRAINAGE k UTILITY EASEMENTS SHOWN THUS. KNOW PERSONSBYT}ffSE PRESENTS. rhr1P.nI icwofCema.ilIehu,a 4illageHank [her mi tout Cue City C ofth<Ci ofCentervige, AOOke County, hfitmca4 duty Corporation under the laws of l.Lrvlesa4 owner ofthe following dncnbd propmy, and Village fames R. Smith PresideuiC, E. O. dY t ty ry Hv,k,awrporationu gag«o g on 23 prom c0i OF ) dry of 19�by lama R. Smith as Cisymth�e o imhd30d upend A elapsed witho of M h o °Noo h IM 51 tdre - - - -1' s -o i� - - -- du the laws OrMorre.l., mon fthc kdlomis dadibed to Ppre p eguarm« dog Yo vouted ttthe County of Anloky Sutc D(hLtmcsou, to xm STATE OF MINNESOTA) The forego: g' strvmcnt waz acknowlod ed 1,eFOR me this T r � And the North Puilfofure Northeast Quanvofthe Southwm Quarteror Seca PresidenUEE.O. cfViJIaSs Bank, a Minn to corporvion, on Townslup 31, Range 22 a d,pt the Weed 25500 feet °fthe North 140. W feet ofsaid behalf of We ryontion. rmomuaerbatio:u, as providd by Mitm. Statutes, Section 505.03, Subd. 2. North Halfoflhe Non'neaal Quoui of toe Swthwal Quarto of Sa:fmn 23. - s 15 City of Centerville Arwka Co Mhoeta: ____ ___1 — w Have caused the same to be a rve std platted as PARK'VLEW std do heeby donate and Notary Public, _County, Minnesota ry' m der te to The public for public use fore.er the road, are, tnum C par line, and k as shown on the 10 iw plat, also deditaring the som enenu for utility ud/or drainage poroscs ss shown on the plat. alao My Commission expires BY Thomas D. Willueber, Mayor r dedicating m the C ... ,ofMoka the nght of... Onto County Store Aid Highway No 21 as B Ry -Chel Gaustad, City Clerk BEING 10 FEET IN WIDTH AND ADJOINWG STREET LINES shownonthephit. fnwhousswhersoCutd I'v vewof Cone iglrc. hascaosdthese AND REAR LOT UNES, AND 5 FEET IN WIDTH AND ADUOINING presmts to be 4gnd by its proper olfiuron Ws day of 19 l hereby certify door l have sn-,M and pond the prapury descdbd on this plat as SIDE LOT LINES, UNLESS SHOWN OTHERWSE ON THIS PLAT. Also in wo. whereof said YJlage Hank hss caused these presoi to be signd by its Proper PARI(V[EW, toad this pd is a correct rcprmnatio° ofthe scanty_ that all dis. are officers this day of 19_ conecdy art on the plat in f still hwWr dtha of a f t, Ihu all m —..a will be corrmly Checkd+d Appr°vod this _day of t9_ placd in the ground As deignatd, that the outside boundary lira are duroody designated on the ParkvioW of Co se,tu, Arc_ plat, sill that there arc no was rd lards as defined H MS 503 02, Solid, 1, or public highways to be BY Aroka County Survryor. Richud S Carted, as President daigazted otter than as shown. STATE OF MRJNESOTA) The foregoing irutrvment was acknowledged bef me has Todd W. Menke, Land Survryor COUNTY OF ) _day of 19 by Richard 5. Carboq is Mu'nesota License No. 15612 President of Par, owof Centerville, inns., a M orresota mrporatioq on bdWf oldie Corporation. STATEOFMINNESOTA) The foregoing iosoumrnl was acbpwidgd before me this COUNT, OF 1 _day of 19 by Tdd W. Menke, Land Surveyor. Notary Public, __Counay, Mimaou. Notary Publiy _County, Miruaota My Commission apirss My Commission earn. Ma t tke Engineering, Inc. 1 I I I 588'40'07 'E 1060.91 -- IJne of NE t/4 of SW 1/4 01 SecLm 23 _________1 r 1 ________ __ i _______ _______ .L______J_ 914 ____ I � � r 912 l L6 z 1\ __ __ I I -1 I ,i x ao ; .e .'xi e= BLOCKxt 6 Ema9.len oI.no s / PAD 09.9 I I` , 1 i PAD 910.6 / MN- Gara 9 0.9 1 1 __JL y ' hY 7 MN Go.... 9e 1 1 - mow.. G, 1 2 l 3 ' PAD 9 S/ 6 . Mom GRAPHIC : / o L awett Floor Ges I o I SCALE veer`{ PAD 912{ / PAD 913.1 PI�D 911.5 / PAD 911.5 RAGi 911.5 PAD 911.6 PAD 911.1 Lowe,t floor 906.6 9 / �E - - 0I Ir _ I I i 1 Z n, G.,.,P yl}4 M'n. Co 911 Min. Game 9�.5 MN. Garage 9125 Mh Garage 9125 Mln. Geroge 912.6 M'm. Garo9e 9121 SE ^' n. _ r o.ezl no« 90 5 Lawe, Floor 906.0 Lo -eat Floar 908.0 1 *` owest floor 9p9. I L� cst Floor 908.0 [°wazt Fla- 9025 Lov,at Floor 907 0 - 1 1 T C SEA $E ! SE SE SE SE o I 255.02 t \ [ .}p ,10 .2 a l mare - sp x n. I" q31 / T.°r g• 911_2 la - �91z $ / Y ov{1 Flo« 906- 1 �t - a12 .aa ~ - I PARK VIEW 1 I . 912 1 1 �0 1. 910 M � M 5 - w AD 913 o i., 1 2 n L 9<9140 I PAD 912.1 PAD 3 1 4 L e t Geer 900.5 I 1 Min. Car a H14 -3 91 },I PAD 912.1 ~ 1 1 I immr f k Wrtr 1 P9 Ma. Gara 9111 PA0 81281 t a. SE -WO 94 I m detag) 9' Nin. Garage 910.6 YN Garage 91 }.1 5 0mm de Sep «ale Pmd ham IN4U.d Lovol Floor 909.6 Lo. <st F!oor 909.6 ,y, Zt / \ -_ 1 SE -WO Lown! Floor 9 °9.6 Covent floor 900.5 Gor 9115 j PAD 911s / , p{ SE u - 1 - - Oewtlon 906.5 SE -w0 SE -w0 I m, Fte.r .06. 0 l Mra. It Flear 9 .0 ng. 91 5 910 Lo -e 1 22 1 , 1 mz 1 + / AD 9ns La... 908. � a Lovett `, ___cam____ L. t 1 G °P. w 907.5 PAD 9139075 4 9 I I M1 p I SE Pm 1 O n 1 fr J SE -WO 1 It Gaxa9e 4re.9 6 T 21 AD 914.0 0 ge,p eA! Mia Cam9e PAC gz24" \ Nn. ey<915. y Apo �„ oar sere. - - I- n: carag< 1 N Pa 907 eA SE Law„1 naar a < SE 1 a P 91.3 3 o a� 910 _ 8 SE -wo / rn n La ,, no,9as�ss 1 \ 1 - �' ro 0 10 9 2q M -WO e G, 1 g Z i a Z j o I PAD,.,. 7 19 _ BLOCK L l \ - °(. 0 -• IJ I P A 914] n. Garo9e 915.3 / 8 1 AO 914.5 ° P, S In. Garo9e 9t 5. west floor 909.6 PO 9121 I PPD 4121 °' y °9e 9156 I $ 1 J Ze DL Lewaat Fleor 909.6 5E -WO / PAD I].8 Mi .Garage 9151 Min. Garage 1 - Nin. Go-,, 914.8 Lox s1 Floor 908.0 1 L °veel no- .0 - ___ L l lour 90].5 2 Z o / Lowesl Floor 909.6 SE SE -WO ? p Ee -WO +g Pao 91VJ 1 w 1 W . II 11 5E -w0 •.•••' ^' 1 1 ad 915.0 c- os.99 0 0 l 1 1 g .: nave 40as 1 1 it agga 916.0 / [ I a r `cn.<k 25 l m FB -WO 1 38 a p{ Lo z Fl `909.8 9 10- d} 6 +00 5+00 4100 PAO 912.5 1 PAD 914.6 un.a r w •r n• -� 5E- WO 1- _ --I -- n Garage 915.8 Ab in. Garay.' 913 d ES t Flmr am.5 Too le. PARK TERRAC 91 2 Lawv! Fleoi 90 . I 1 B `3 PAD n. c oo` s.o 914J ! 1 1 Garage 915. 15 16 PAD 9126 O x 26 vut r:o 906. / t Floor 909.6 PAD, 91].5 PAD 91].0 Min. Cm " 91J8 I P}D 915.2 FB -WO / 1 1 PAD 9140 Min, Ga 914.5 Loxest Floor 901 � Mm. Garage 916.2 1J 9< Min. Goroge 9 .8. U 1 1 I E -WO Min. Garage 915.0 Laweat Floor 909.6 L zzl hoar 901.5 PAD 91 s.5 1 PAD 3!4.5 Lawee( Flow 908.5 SE -WO Nin. Goroge 916.5 C ry 1 Lawezl Floor 909.6 Fe -WO 1 1 1 Mm. .°ra 91x.5 SE -WO SE -w0 Lewe,t Fl°°r 9m.5 1 __ _ Lovext Floo _909.6 S 910 1 _ _ FB -WO _ \ - 1 I .1 ... , 12 cMP r/F7o - m En] Rvroo (c°u ) __ d N003902 W. 1 _�_______________e. Lnr�404- Oa.___ I 1315.65 t S lnv 905.10 i Y 1 1 1 1 1 1 l ! 1 Pmd -U., 9D5.50 1 N1remM r,tl/pgrteA r I loo-5•a, D. -tioa M.w IawMa.n fiya..maux 1. fta&.aA.lrweta 3. PNa M ante alrn leer,, 100 -1a1 obey e . 2 c1a a/w rml Fel,blubnem Hero: / MN. Flea F]ewUm H00.50 I mow 4e Stalpiletopsoilerrepze.dova ill tlismrtd aro :0 A J0 4adm &Pfau aMnve tmvan POndlwalud ua vW upLaa rr� y ar l ` " � .- i Fabi<arWw+x 1a.a' A 25a) Mlnt Jetuei.�M1- Sad eM mete arw bel till( ud ,tart /i°p l FIp'ap rpl C<N<tWled nrclr b<W wM Y & - n8 vamp'vipn Y 6V O dl Storm Sera Outedle 1 as rer 1v pmWwnlugar wilnm tD as of m .w <„a b as n harvest mu muAA eM disk Ph¢,ItwM m. lim WOHWaIaM baMm / N a. wgYe«,w,n 49,y1•,mx+Wn MIIN1, 5..nuwuraBl£ 5 5 wb Poaa l'p a , P rN nWd Btu Wall lar. °4 ay Mwwn tart,,. 6v mrtlrfea. C'.w[RER Nv0 k 4VrrCA a 1 rmauNw6Arprt Vagof § Pativu Arew :^9 [M.. lD y dNCn mrszMm b°npm. Btck11°eb C ex l 6 a0t NK aaa R {' Pmd. nuro nett p.aaw ltirc l., N.p '•" 1 aASa attars: Mtn. I.,. MM WW, ve ud ,p 1 ftadooT rates e , I be l e d r [ _ i� , sa ' (ercn mram.�nr A, h at adud WRerva.PPM' m J, F m�ud P en valved ' - n . wue 1.itl[ollp'MNDOT Saa5WUe1 - wiaA mPhuit on NUive z / \Ex19Twa VMMD Mae gar,eep lgwlaargwvion. anWrMbe le.in m,m.r<n I l r,CT0 G,a >,M FoAZ'. (MU Bmdc°n: rue - 50 RµAa Type1 lap arpt tlN pare. wM lb'wa,. A, paN Atth harper. ( r. " aIA A LA ro mwrt win be gr.;n ° anw -et, il..t or eye - may. nl- 4.5 vo[w.l_e amalwnti aiFl.aeebord. Fwb... me -c 22s [eI a.ae Moen CONSTRICTION [lnunet TRAIL'DETAIL F1gMr. u:: ryp[�Ilwell.mn wr,l[na. g"TeD A, paar to Act -) Man e.[a: tawrvaan a e bete 6,rrl.r va r 'A n.. IE.1. erma�MaMS • .. a.AG A0011ON5 RE'd510N5 Fl 5 C.d..n d: Asaoci lea, Inc. 1 hued, e«tdy that We 'an, epeeiHcotim, d ` 7671 Oentml Avenue N� 11/2 �23a0 r1PE 310 61Nwnp/5 BaSE [vuPS[ or retort vat prepared Ey me o under my DLO. OA 'E )MW CMKD. PPVD CMMENrS +n aUMOFITY Fridle MN 55432 612) 766 -1216 Fl nss5.w+cca[ suet aw =�+eim, tad mm 1 am a aaly 1 s ee N «ale RC. .mare clan e. NATTKE ENGINEERING, INC. L 2o' uoan[n s[aer a6..aL.6 arA9aw Re toed Pmfuaionol En tore. me PARKVIEW aolErna ..6ec gi. yin "` 2 `hr /" 7671 Cen trot Avenue NE PRadscr nrLE Slate °t Yin .... le Stetutea, S,ctio" t26 n2 TYPICAL SIAEET SECTION to 326.16. Fridley, MN 55432 DflareMC nrLF Gradin Pon Develo meet Plan (1 TOM RE9DEnnAL) Ted W. Np n�P.E. (612) 783 -0300 DRAIN CARD APPRDVED TAM SCAE: 1 =51) DRaw or Date: 5/]/)6 Ninn. fle Na. 15fi12 CHECKED DATE 5/7/99 STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF ANOKA CITY OF CENTERVILLE EXTRACT OF MINUTES OF MEETING OF THE CENTERVILLE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CENTERVILLE, MINNESOTA HELD: June 10, 1998 Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a Council meeting of the City Council of the City of Centerville, Minnesota, was duly called and held at the City hall in said City on the 10 day of June 1998, at 6:00 o'clock p.m. The following members were present: Councilmember introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION 98 -13 APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND ORDERING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS WHEREAS, the consulting engineers for the City have prepared final plans and specifications for the construction of Parkview Improvements of 1998 in the City, and such plans and specifications have been presented to this Council for approval, NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Centerville, Minnesota: 1. Such plans and specifications are hereby approved and ordered to be placed on file in the office of the City Clerk. 2. The City Clerk shall prepare and cause to be inserted in the official Forest bake Times newspaper and in the Construction Bulletin an advertisement for bids upon the making of such improvements under such approved plans and specifications. The advertisement shall be published in each of the said publications at least three weeks before the date set for opening bids, shall specify the work to done, shall state that bids will be publicly opened on Tuesday, July 14, 1998 at 10:00 o'clock a.m. at Centerville City Hall in said City and that no bids will be considered unless sealed and filed with the Clerk and accompanied by a cash deposit, cashier's check, bid bond or certified check payable to the Clerk for 5% of the amount of such bids. The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was seconded by Councilmember and upon vote being take thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. Thomas Wilharber, Mayor ATTEST: Ry -Chel Gaustad, CMC City Clerk o Howard R. Green Company i WS11ME MUM S CONSULTING ENGINEERS Formerly MSA Consuiting Engineers June 5, 1998 File: 260094M -0325 Mr. Jim March, Administrator Centerville City Hall 1880 Main Street Centerville, MN 55038 RE: LAMOTTE PARK PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS Dear Mr. March: As we presented at the June 3r Park and Recreation Committee meeting, we have discussed the potential wetland impacts on the Lamotte Park project with Ms. Kate Drewry, of the Rice Creek Watershed District. We reviewed aerial photographs and an affidavit with Ms. Drewry showing that a significant amount of the wetland on the Lamotte Park property was constructed in the late 1960's. This information is attached for your review. Ms. Drewry agreed with this conclusion and will allow impacts to the non - jurisdictional wetlands on the site. This will greatly reduce the amount of mitigation required on the project, and will thus reduce the cost of the project significantly. We discussed wetland credits with Mr. Gerald Rehbein on Thursday. He may be willing to donate credits for the remaining small amount of wetland mitigation the project will require. This would allow the project to be completed with no expense for the wetland mitigation work. As requested at the June 3 rd Park and Recreation Committee meeting, we will be presenting a cost estimate for preparation of plans and specifications of the Lamotte Park project at the June 10` City Council meeting. In the next few days, we will be discussing the project and cost estimate with Mr. Bruce Chamberlain, our landscape architect on the project, to quantify separate costs of the project for different design features, such as the ball fields, playground equipment, tennis courts, and basketball courts. O: \PROJ\260094m 103251094- 0502.j u ne. doc 1326 Energy Park Drive • St. Paul, MN 55108 • 612/644 -4389 fax 612/644 -9446 toll free 888/368 -4389 Mr. Jim March June 5, 1998 Page 2 We will present these options and provide input at the City Council meeting on these issues. We look forward to getting this important project moving again for the residents of the City of Centerville. Sincerely, Ho R. Green Company J k iI � David E. Nyberg, P.E. Project Manager Enclosures Cc: Mr. Paul Palzer, Centerville Public Works Mr. Christopher Bolt, Howard R. Green Company 0:\PR0J\260094m \03251094' OSZYLj'GrYe�.ddc� R Green Company CONSULTING ENGINEERS MINNESOTA WETLAND CONSERVATION ACT (WCA) AFFIDAVIT EXEMPTION EVIDENCE FOR LOCAL GOVERNMENT UNITS (LGU) I do hereby certify that the following statement of evidence or activity is true and may be used as evidence to support qualification for WCA exemptions. The LGU may require additional affidavits or verification evidence before making an exemption determination. Location: (County, Township, Range, Section 1/4, v4, 1/4) City of Centerville, Anoka County, Minnesota SW 1 4 of Section 23, Township 31N, Range 22W Description of Evidence for Exemption # 5: Incidental Wetlands I, Mr. Can Tourville, currently retired and residing at 10830 240 Street, Scandia, Minnesota, farmed this property for over 20 years since the late 1960 I can attest to the following about the property's history: 1. It has been consistently planted in the low, wetland area, shown on the attached illustration, since the land was originally converted for agricultural use. Crops generally remained healthy in this area during dry growing seasons. 2. Five property owners collaborated to dig the County Ditch on the south side of the property in the mid- 1940's. My father re- excavated and cleaned it out in 1966 or 1967. 3. A swale was created in the late 1960's to drain the wetland area: a plow was used to excavate the swale by "dead furrowing ". On penalty of perjury, I hereby swear under oath that the information above, made for the purpose of documenting qualification for an exemption from the WCA, is true to the best of my knowledge. 470 -34 -3549 Signature Date Social Sec. No. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT The foregoing instrument was subscribed and sworn to before me on: (day), (month), (year), by (Notary Stamp or Seal lilt /i / /lc re " t , Wit/ � ] 1 ''t r , 1 K Y ' •:, j} �� „•,�r- -. ,-.._ �.. t, I" � ' i it Y I�r.. Rj.. a .,'(.Xr',xt)k�f 1 �1_ -�•. � • �' � �. � v 5 > '" � .'Fr t' 1)L f r F g ` t .i �i t , p R' !f Y.., Y �. i .[I�:, .� r ,, S �b ,�..kfYU V�Vt f`� i� •+ h1Y( � +.. IN It 4 L. _ r ' ti1 � ig t �1 K < eC•k �� tj. ti � "h ' ` .kTi'�4.51 ,ra.1 ^�*-) `�" '. � ,. � .�' j�` (: � �"�"I F � J , �{ a•� " �� r.Y+,)-p� ? , r. jl .,( f i --�, .... l,� ('�� k cyr. r•,L' 'b ." �. ll s 4 ° 'k td "` ' � ,. i y 1 1 { ' � [ v �: . 'k %a I..FJ1• T'' }.. j l i.�. W WI I, J.5 dY + i �t _ r Y C T '� 1 ...,yY._r ks } . a � •�' Fy4�`F'r' �, ' �� r S ; . 3 A F < D rr J} J ..�wa y t� j \ ♦i ' 'Vb i ` b 3 *fi�x44.�.F. #+., St4 �� £`.I �;, u.,.�•�wrk tr. r >: • ti, � � $ .Tr��k :S� .•� y � � FSf i� tP �%? 9Yf �! +a M��'4a ° ♦ � e+ � 7p � -�M �i� - r � Y L 1V`'FF++" �- r i.<r i a i�yKt- Xf �t � � � n F. v � ,p...,p •��. r•. S s a;j!_ W}..:. ML- AT h � � v yy ` Y � � »' i .,.w `.Y i. � �� } va tF �S "'v. d^+ �iF` �;1 -� • +I v '�w f "wr i. `A j�� � Y ¢Ni.`��r �iry''s•Y'�' '� f` sr..' F (�F ' 4y�,' y'•. { '. ; , 4 J ! �.'y.Z. 45r �r z' ''"' } "k +.. ri it � Ttiz,.Y • il, ,. ,.dk a .� • T w � Y e S • v`l� r a ) X 4 Fs + Y 9 r.7'w a rt yS4 5 `� Mf r T} } �';': I � I�� i � 4i^��9' • s , �"v5 � I 7 e u � ]_ ; '. ', t I w r T � ' w ) s • .�� �.' �, w `. 4k. ' i 'w ;bY f ^«fin , . t m c:� iP � Y I AO'tt tf r • * � � i r'•��4 'St c y Fr �'p� ' !' p "�4 FFb w)r��• � ;.���w� w " ,5..x r �' �a'�f f��'�sa �:� �� ' I � I qrt Y r �� % It r S ]'e �t ♦ o L ° .r. ��' „r :. .: ., ... .... ... ^'+ ;s;rr ^h» � .,•pa IYP.���}Yf , aa� � � 1 06/05/98 FRI 10:26 FAX 1 612 426 3077 REEBEIN, INC. ¢1002 REHBEIN, INC. Beneficial reuse and management of Municipal, Agricultural and industrial Waste June 5, 1998 Mr. Jim March City of Centerville 1880 Main St. Centerville, MN 55038 Dear Mr. March: Here is a quote to upgrade 21st Ave. The quote covers 2 areas as follows: 1. Dimensions: 400' (long) x 20' (wide) Includes: fabric, sand, drain tile, cross culvert, aggregate base (reshaping the ditch) This will match into the Centerville driveways 2. Dimensions, 16' (wide) x 1 -1/2" (wide) Includes: bituminous base coarse These improvement will be an identical match to he work I am doing on the Lino side of that area of 21 st Ave. The price for all this work will be a lump sum price of $24, 550.00 If this is approved we will commence work the 15th of June, 1998. Sincerely A Gerald Rehbein President cc: David Nyberg 6805 20th Avenue South • P.O. Box 324 • Hugo, MN 55038 -0324 (612) 426 -1345 • Fax (612) 426.3077 An Equal Opportunity Employer MEMO DATE : June 5, 1998 TO Honorable Mayor and Council FROM : Jim March RE Senior Housing - Barett House and Garage ,tt *t,t,tt� *,tt *xirt *xxx :r��rx, rte**+ rxirt* t*** * *t,r *t *ttt *t *t *,r,t :,tt,t * * *,t Now that the Chauncey Barett Gardens project is complete, we need to decide what to do with the Barett house and garage. The house is approximately 8' into the Centerville road right -of -way. This poses a potential problem for looping the watermain from the Parkview Development to the seni r housing watermain. I believe the garage would have some value for someone that would want to move it off of the property. We have placed "For Sale" signs on the garage and have received a call from a house mover that would be interested in the building. I would suggest that we take sealed proposals on the garage for anyone that would like to purchase the structure and move it off of the site. I have contacted two house movers that have indicated that the existing house would not be worth moving off the site. Bob Barett (Violet Barett's son) stopped in City Hall and dropped off the keys and garage door opener for the buildings. He asked when the house would be torn down. He indicated that he hoped no one was considering keeping the structure, since it is in such bad shape. I have asked Paul Palzer to walk thry the structure and document any deficiencies with the structure. Paul's memo is included in your packet. I have discussed burning the house down with the Fire Chief. They are interested in burning the structure for training purposes. Per the joint powers agreement with the Anoka County HRA, the City is responsible for removing the house and garage at our own initiative or if so requested by the HRA. I believe the removal of the structures would greatly enhance the appearance and view for those living within the new senior housing building. MEMO 5 June 98 To: Jim March n From: Paul Palzer Re: 7024 Centerville Road I inspected the Barett's house and the following items would have to be addressed if the city would want to rent out the house. 1. The electrical system is a non - grounded system but some receptacles have a grounding prong and the entire system would require work to bring it up to current safety standards. 2. The windows in the bedroom areas do not meet egress requirements, the stairway is not up to code and the guard rail at the top of the steps is dangerous due to the low height. 3. The home doesn't have smoke detectors in the bedroom areas. 4. I was unable to view the heating system due to the electrical supply being disconnected, and this system would have to be tested. If the city wishes to remove the building the following items would have to be addressed before demolition is started. a. The electric service to the power pole would have to be disconnected. b. The gas would have to be disconnected and capped. c. The cable lime would have to be disconnected. d. The well would have to be abandoned and sealed. I would also make the recommendation that the door hardware be salvaged for its historical value and possibly some old newspapers in the attic area. RESOURCE STRATEGIES CORPORATION 1400' RIDG[DALE DRIVE SUITE 300 MIFi�ETONKA, MAN 55x05 April 22, 1998 612/513 -9548 FAX 612/5139549 Mr. Jim March City Administrator City of Centerville Centerville, MN 55038 Re: Contract for Consulting Services Dear Jim: Enclosed please find an original and one copy of a contract for consulting services for your consideration. This agreement incorporates the proposed scope of services and budget submitted one year ago. Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions or would like any clarification with the proposed contract. Sincerely, Dean Johnson President President encl. CITY OF CENTERVILLE ZONING ORDINANCE REVISIONS CONSULTING SERVICES CONTRACT I. REQUEST FOR SERVICES The City of Centerville has requested consulting assistance for the revision of Ordinance No. 4, the Centerville Zoning Ordinance, II. SCOPE OF SERVICES Attachment A outlines the Work Scope and Budget for revisions to the Centerville Zoning Ordinance. III. COMPENSATION Attachment A identifies the budget for consulting services at a cost not to exceed $7945.00 for labor. Expenses are estimated at $811.00 IV. ACCEPTANCE The parties agree to the terms of this contract and authorize the consulting services to commence this day of 1 1998. CITY OF CENTERVILLE RESOURCE STRATEGIES CORPORATION / BY BY Its Mayor Its President BY Its City Clerk ATTACHMENT A March 18, 1997 Mr. Jim March City Administrator City of Centerville 1880 Main Street Centerville, MN 55038 RE: Zoning Ordinance Revisions - Work Scope/Budget Dear Jim: We have spoken several times in recent months about potential amendments to the Zoning Ordinance. You have expressed a desire for additional clarification for "estate" residential provisions and rezoning options. I have mentioned several updates t at are necessary to implement the Comprehensive Plan. I have completed a review of the current ordinance and offer the following comments and options. Ordinance No, 4, Centerville Zoning Ordinance, was adopted in 1982. There have been numerous amendments to the ordinance in the past 15 years. Some provisions of the ordinance are rather antiquated and the document contains its share of the "heretofores ", of the typical legalese of the 1960's. The ordinance is not easy to read, in part because of the language, but also because of its basic organization and format. The content of the ordinance includes many of the basic provisions found in ordinances, but it is missing several essential components and many mandatory elements. There are references to "conditional use permits (CUPs);" although, the administrative section refers to "special use permits (SUPs). CUPS are defined in the ordinance but there is no definition for SUPS. The ordinance references the "Planning and Zoning Commission" in some spots and "Planning Commission" in other sections. One PUD section identifies permitted uses as residential, commercial and community facilities, while another section references industrial development standards. ATTACHMENT A City of Centerville March 18, 1997 Page Two At a minimum, I would recommend additions /revisions in the following areas: • Clarify and recategorized residential districts • Expand the number of commercial districts, including a Central Business District • Shoreland protection standards • Best management practices • NURP standards • Wetland conservation requirements • Obstructions to airspace navigations • Communication towers • Update performance standards • Update definitions • Timetable for action (60 -day law) • Day care and group homes (mandatory) These revisions are fairly extensive and will require putting the entire document into a word processing software compatible with the City. My clear preference would be to reorganize and rewrite the entire ordinance. It will streamline the document, modernize it for better clarification and reformat it for readability and comprehension. From a budget standpoint, I think the rewrite is more cost effective than amending the document with so many revisions. My approach to any revisions would include an orientation with staff to verify and secure all relevant City ordinances and amendments which have bearing on the content of the zoning ordinance. I would propose a work session with the Planning Commission (City Council welcome also) to inventory all issues, problem areas and deficiencies of the current ordinance. We would also discuss each other's wish lists for ordinance provisions. A follow up work meeting would include review of an outline of ordinance revisions and potential content issues from previous discussions. I like to review most key issues in a conceptual format with the Planning Commission, prior to writing formal provisions. This generally saves time in the long run, generates more local input and understanding in the process and gives me better direction at the beginning of the process. ATTACHMENT A City of Centerville March 18, 1997 Page Three Additional areas for discussion include the CUP /SUP provisions. At a minimum, the ordinance requires editing to reference either a CUP or SUP process, not both. I would also like to present arguments why neither process may be necessary. There are often misunderstandings about the purpose and benefits of these permits, as well as limitations, which should be debated. The current ordinance does not appear to establish a Board of Appeals and Adjustments. The Planning Commission apparently acts in that capacity to hear variances, but the City Council actually approves the variances. It may be more efficient to grant authority to one rather than two bodies. There is an appeal process where the City Council hears alleged errors in an administrative ruling or Planning Commission action. This is a good provision for an ordinance; however, it is somewhat invalid because the Planning Commission is making recommendations under the current ordinance, not final authorizations. I would envision six or seven staff/Planning Commission meetings to generate a complete draft document for public review. Experience dictates that up to three public meetings/hearings are about average for formal review and adoption. The entire process will take nine to twelve months, if there are no major controversies or external issues affecting the project. The following budget identifies the major work categories and consultant roles. This cost estimate is firm and can be considered a cost not to exceed, provided the scope remains the same. I have also estimated expenses for the proj ect. TASK Partner As sociate Support Total I. Mobilization/Orientation $825 $270 $0 $1095 II. Background / Outlines $900 $360 $100 $1360 III. Working Drafts $2025 $360 $150 $2535 IV. Final Draft $900 $270 $150 $1320 V. Public Review/ $1125 $360 $150 $1535 Revisions / Adoption TOTALS $5775 $1620 $550 $7945 ATTACHMENT A City of Centerville March 18, 1997 Page Four ESTIMATED EXPENSES Draft Copies 2500 @ $0.12 $300.00 Postage 27 @ $3.00 $ 81.00 Mileage 850 @ $0.30 $255.00 Final Document 25 @ $7.00 $175.0 0 TOTAL $811.00 I hope this information is helpful. I am available to answer any questions you may have or provide you with any additional information you may desire. I am also available to discuss this in detail with the City Council. Sincerely Dean R. Johnson President MEMORANDUM DATE: June 5, 1998 TO: Honorable Mayor and Council FROM: Ry -Chel Gaustad RE: Tobacco Ordinance # 66 A proposed tobacco ordinance is enclosed for your consideration and approval. The 1997 session of the legislature enacted a number of changes to Minnesota Statutes relating to the licensing and sales of tobacco products to minors. These changes, which were effective .August 1, 1997, involve MS 461.12, 461. 19, and 171.171 (Please see attached). The new law requires all cities' and/or counties to adopt specific regulations regarding the sale of tobacco products. This ordinance has been designed to achieve this goal. Joel Heckman, Acting Police Chief reviewed and assisted me in customizing this ordinance. Likewise, the proposed tobacco ordinance meets with the state laws and Mr. Heckman's approval. Moreover, on Thursday, March 12, 1998 the Planning and Zoning Commission held a public hearing on proposed Tobacco Ordinance #66. After substantial discussion regarding ordinance 466, the consensus of the Commission was the following: Ms. Broussard - Vickers moved and it was seconded to forward tobacco ordinance 966 to the City Council; apply appropriate numbering and strike in its entirety, Tobacco Ordinance 66.13 Penalties. Subd. 3. Minors. (Minors found in unlawful possession of, or who unlawfully purchased or attempt to purchase tobacco, tobacco products, or tobacco related devices shall be charged an administrative fee set by City Council resolution and will be subjected to 20 hours of community service). The above - mentioned amendments are incorporated in the proposed tobacco ordinance. Unfortunately, a minor will be the tobacco purchasing violator. And whereas, it is unlawful to expose a minor in the public process. Therefore, the Anoka County Juvenile Attorney recommends violators be subject to the juvenile judicial system. However, if not effective, Anoka County will suggest changes. Mr. Hellings agreed with Anoka County's recommendation. All tobacco license holders have been notified thirty days in advance of the Council's meeting date to consider the proposed ordinance change. Set Appropriate License Fee Generally, a license fee should cover the cost for staff time, including the license application process, inspection of licensees, training, communication needs (letters, forms, reports, ect.), a budget for tobacco purchases and printing and mailing cost. The licensing fee will become effective for licencing year 1999. The following is an account of other cities' tobacco licensing fees: The city of Andover $ 75.00 The city of Anoka $250.00 The city of Blaine $150.00 The city of Circle Pines $ 50.00 The city of Fridley $150.00 Council action is requested, whether to adopt or change proposed ordinance #66 and to establish a licensing fee. MinnctGdta ASSion Laws 1997, Chapter 227 Page I of 4 NTinnesota Statutes and Session Lav s Minnesota Session Laws - 1997 Key: ... new laneuaee Change lan_ua¢e enhancement display. Le¢islative history and Authors CHAPTER 227- H.F.NO. 117 An act relating to commerce; requiring local units of government to license the retail sale of tobacco; providing for mandatory penalties against license holders for sales to minors; requiring compliance checks; restricting self- service sales; requiring disclosure of specified substances in tobacco products; prescribing penalties; amending Minnesota Statutes 1996, sections 171.171; 260.195, subdivisions 3 and 3a; and 461.12; proposing coding for new law in Minnesota Statutes, chapter 461; repealing Minnesota Statutes 1996, section 325E.075. BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA: Section 1. Minnesota Statutes 1996, section 171.171, is amended to read: 171.171 [SUSPENSION; ILLEGAL PURCHASE OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES OR TOBACCO PRODUCTS.] The commissioner shall suspend for a period of 90 days the license of a person who: (1) is under the age of 21 years and is convicted of purchasing or attempting to purchase an alcoholic beverage in violation of section 340A.503 if the person used adrivers license, permit or Minnesota identification card to purchase or attempt to purchase the alcoholic beverage; e (2) is convicted under section 171.22, subdivision 1, clause (2), or 340A.503, subdivision 2, clause (3), of lending or knowingly permitting a person under the age of 21 years to use the person's driver's license, permit or Minnesota identification card to purchase or attempt to purchase an alcoholic beverage; (3) is under the age of 18 years and is found by a court to have committed a petty misdemeanor under section 609.685, subdivision 3, it the person used a driver's license, permit, or Minnesota identification card to purchase or attempt to purchase the tobacco product; or (4) is convicted under section 171.22, subdivision 1, clause (2) , of lendino or knowingly permitting a person +under t he age of 18 years to use the person's driver's license, permit, or Minnesota identification card to purchase or attempt to purchase a tobacco product Sec. 2. Minnesota Statutes 1996, section 260.195, subdivision 3, is amended to read: ' Subd. 3. [DISPOSITIONS.] If the juvenile court finds that a child is a petty offender, the court may: (a) require the child to pay a fine of up to $100; (b) require the child to participate in a community service Project; (c) require the child to participate in a drug awareness program; (d) place the child on probation for up to six months; (e) order the child to undergo a chemical dependency evaluation and if warranted by this evaluation, order participation by the child in an outpatient chemical dependency treatment program; (f) order the child to make restitution to the victim; or (g) perform any other activities or participate in any other outpatient treatment programs deemed appropriate by the court. 9/16/97 9:54:48 AM Minnesota Session Laws 1997, Chapter 227 Paae 2 of 4 In all cases where the juvenile court finds that a child has purchased or attempted to purchase an alcoholic beverage in violation of section 340A.503, if the child has a driver's license or permit to drive, and if the child used a driver's license, permit or Minnesota identification card to purchase or attempt to purchase the alcoholic beverage, the court shall forward its finding in the case and the child's driver's license or permit to the commissioner of public safety. Upon receipt, the commissioner shall suspend the child's license or permit for a period of 90 days. In all cases where the juvenile court finds that a child has purchased or attempted to purchase tobacco in violation of section 609.685, subdivision 3, if the child has a driver's license or permit to drive, and if the child used a driver's license, permit, or Minnesota identification card to purchase or attempt to purchase tobacco, the court shall forward its findin in the case and the child's driver's license or permit to the commissioner or public safety. Upon receipt, the commissioner shall suspend the child's license or permit for a period of 90 days. None of the dispositional alternatives described in clauses (a) to (f) shall be imposed by the court in a manner which would cause an undue hardship upon the child. . Sec. 3. Minnesota Statutes 1996, section 260.195, _ subdivision 3a, is amended to read: Subd. 3a. [ENHANCED DISPOSITIONS.] If the juvenile court finds that a child has committed a second or subsequent juvenile alcohol or controlled substance offense, the court may impose any of the dispositional alternatives described in paragraphs (a) to (c). If the juvenile court finds that a child has committed a second or subsequent ju venile tobacco offense, the court may impose any of the dispositional alternatives described in paragraphs (a) to (c)_ (a) The court may impose any of the dispositional alternatives described in subdivision 3, clauses (a) to (f). 1 b) If the adjudicated petty offender has a driver's license or permit, the court may forward t e license or permit to the commissioner of public safety. The commissioner shall revoke the petty offender's driver's license or permit until the offender reaches the age of 18 years or for a period of one year, whichever is longer. (c) if the adjudicated petty offender has a driver's license or permit, the court may suspend the driver's license or permit for a period of up to 90 days, but may allow the offender driving privileges as necessary to travel to and from work. (d) If the adjudicated petty offender does not have a driver's license or permit, the court may prepare an order of denial of driving privileges. The order must provide that the petty offender will not be granted driving privileges until the offender reaches the age of 18 years or for a period of one year, whichever is longer. The court shall forward the order to the commissioner of public safety. The commissioner shall deny the offender's eligibility for a driver's license under section 171.04, for the period stated in the court order. Sec. 4. Minnesota Statutes 1996, section 461.12, is amended to read: 461.12 [MUNICIPAL GIGARST?^a TOBACCO LICENSE.] Subdivision. 1. [AUTHORIZATION.] 4'he A town board or the governing body of each ts%- �.�. and a home rule charter and or statutory city may license and regulate the retail sale aE Late of _ wsagtse -=s tobacco as defined in section 609.685, subdivision 1, and f� establish a license fee for sales to recover the estimated cost of-enforcing this chanter f ees __ dif €eren# 'asses e€ - " r F€ nay=p 'd -€er the Jquf4 q i _ftent = viel_€;_n of th nsl and ;fe ether f h y The county board make 4:akm Y a t .l_ F reee -rx shall license and regulate the sale of tobacco in unorganized territory alsp t _F 9/16/97 9:54:50 AM Minnesota Session Laws 1997, Chapter 227 Page 3 of 4 ________ of the county and in a town or a home rule charter or statutory city if the town or city does not license and regulate - xetail tobacco sales. Retail establishments licensed by a town or city to sell tobacco are not required to obtain a second license for the same location under the licensing ordinance of the county Subd. 2. [ADMINISTRATIVE PENALTIES; LICENSEES.] If a licensee or employee of a licensee sells tobacco to a person under the age of 18 years, or violates any other provision of this chapter, the licensee shall be charged an administrative penalty of $75_ An administrative penalty of 5200 must be imposed for a second violation at the same location within 24 months after the initial violation. For a third violation at the same location within 24 months after the initial violation, an administrative .penalty of 5250 must be imposed, and the licensee's authority to sell tobacco at that location must be suspended for not less than seven days. No suspension or penalty may take effect until the licensee has received notice, served personally or by mail, of the alleged violation and an opportunity for a hearing before a person authorized by the licensing authority to conduct the hearing. A decision that a violation has occurred must be in writing. Subd. 3. [ ADMINISTRPTIVE PENALTY; INDIVIDUALS.) An individual who sells tobacco to a person under the age of 18 years must be charged an administrative penalty of $50. No penalty may be imposed until the individual has received notice, served personally or by mail, of the alleged violation and an opportunity for a hearing before a person authorized by the licensing authority to conduct the hearing. A decision that a violation has occurred must be in writing. Suhd. 4. [MINORS.] The licensing authority shall consult with interested educators, parents, children, and representatives of the court system to develop alternative penalties for minors who purchase, possess, and consume tobacco. The licensing authority and the interested persons shall consider a variety of options, including, but not limited to, tobacco free education programs, notice to schools, parents, community service, and other court diversion programs. Subd. 5. [COMPLIA.NCE CHECKS.] A licensing authority shall conduct unannounced compliance checks at least once each calendar year at each location where tobacco is sold to test compliance with section 609.685. Compliance checks must involve minors over the age of 15, but under the age of 18, who, with the prior written consent of a parent or guardian, attempt to purchase tobacco under the direct supervision of a law enforcement officer at an employee of the licensing authority - Subd. 6. [DEFENSE.] It is an affirmative defense to the charge of selling tobacco to a person under the age of 18 _years in violation of subdivision 2 or 3 that the licensee or individual making the sale relied in good faith upon proof of age as described in section 340A.503, subdivision 6. Subd „ ICI REVIErd.] Anv parson aggrieved b a decision under V subdivision 2 or 3 may have the decision reviewed in the district court in the same manner and procedure as provided in section 462.361. Sec. 5. [461.17] [MANUFACTURERS TO REPORT CERTAIN SUBSTANCES TO ASSIST IN ENFORCEMENT OF LOCAL ORDINANCES.] Subdivision 1. (ANNUAL REPORT REQUIRED.] Each manufacturer of tobacco products sold in Minnesota shall provide the commissioner of health with an annual report, either on paper or by electronic means. The report shall be provided in a form and at a time specified by the commissioner, identifying, for each brand of such product, any of the following substances present in detectable levels in the product in its unburned state and if the product is typically burned when consumed, in its burned state: (1) ammonia or any compound of ammonia; (2) arsenic; (3) cadmium; (4) formaldehyde; and (5) lead. The form for annual reports under this section is not a rule for purposes of chapter 14, including section 14.386. 9/16/97 9:54:50 AM Minnesota Session Laws 1997, Chapter 227 Page 4 of 4 Subd. 2. [ASSISTANCE TO LOCAL GOVERNMENTS.] Upon request, the commissioner shall provide a local government unit with a copy of reports filed under this section, to assist n the enforcement of local ordinances. Subd. 3. [PUBLIC DATA.] Reports under this section are public data. Sec. 6. (461.18] [SELF - SERVICE SALES RESTRICTED.] Subdivision 1. [SELF- SERVICE SALES OF SINGLE PACKAGES ' RESTRICTED.1 (a) No person shall offer for sale single packages of cigarettes or smokeless tobacco in open displays which are accessible to the public without the intervention of a store employee. (b) Cartons and other multipack units may be offered and sold through open displays accessible to the public. (c) Paragraph (b) expires on the effective date of subdivision 3. (d) This subdivision shall not apply to retail stores which derive at least 90 percent of their revenue from tobacco and tobacco- related products and which cannot be entered at any time by persons younger than 18 years of age. Subd. 2. [VENDING MACHINE SALES PROHIBITED.] No person shall sell tobacco products from vending machines. This subdivision does not apply to vending machines in facilities that cannot be entered at any time by persons younger than 18 years of age. - Subd. 3. [FEDERAL REGULATIONS.] Code of Federal Regulations, title 21, part 897.16(c), is incorporated by reference with respect to cartons and other multi pack units. Sec. 7. [461.19] [EFFECT ON LOCAL ORDINANCE; NOTICE.] Sections 461.12 to 461.18 do not preempt a local ordinance that provides for more restrictive regulation of tobacco sales. A governinq body shall give notice of its intention to consider adoption or substantial amendment of any local ordinance required under section 4 or permitted under this section. The govetning body shall take reasonable steps to send notice by mai_'..at least 30 days prior to the meeting to the last known address of each licensee or person required to hold a license under section 4. The notice shall state the time, place, and date of the meeting and the subject matter of the proposed ordinance. Sec. 8. [REPEALER.] Minnesota Statutes 1996, section 325E.075, is repealed. Sec. 9. [EFFECTIVE DATE.] Section 6, subdivision 3, is effective upon the implementation of Code of Federal Regulations, title 21, part 897.16(c). Presented to the governor May 27, 1997 Signed by the governor May 30, 1997 1:40 p.m. 9/16/97 9.54:5] AM CITY OF CENTERVILLE ANOKA COUNTY, MINNESOTA ORDINANCE # 66 An Ordinance Adopting City Code # 66 The Sale of Tobacco The City Council of the City of Centerville does ordain as follows: Sect ion 1. The City Code of the City of Centerville is hereby adopting City Code #66 in its entirety. Section 1 66` - The Sale of Tobacco 66.01 Purpose The city recognizes that many persons under the age of 18 years purchase or otherwise obtain, possess, and use tobacco, tobacco products, and tobacco related devices, and such sales, possession, and use are violations of both State and Federal laws; and because studies, which the city hereby accepts and adopts, have shown that most smokers begin smoking before they have reached the age of 18 years and that those persons who reach the age of 18 years without having started smoking are significantly less likely to begin smoking; and because smoking has been shown to be the cause of several serious health problems which subsequently place a financial burden on all levels of government; This ordinance shall be intended to regulate the sale, possession, and use of tobacco, tobacco products, and tobacco related devices for the purpose of enforcing and furthering existing laws, to protect minors against the serious effects associated with illegal use of tobacco, tobacco products, and tobacco devices, and to further the official public policy of the State of Minnesota in regard to preventing young people from starting to smoke as stated in Minn. Stat. §144.391. 66.02 Definitions As used in this section, the following terms are defined as follows: Subd. 1 Tobacco or Tobacco Products "Tobacco' or "Tobacco products" shall mean any substance or item containing tobacco leaf, including but not limited to, cigarettes; cigars; pipe tobacco; snuff; fine cut or other chewing tobacco; cheroots; stogies; perique; granulated plug cut, crimp cut, ready - rubbed, and other smoking tobacco, snuff flowers; cavendish; shorts; plug and twist tobaccos; dipping tobaccos; refuse scraps; clippings; cuttings; and sweepings of tobacco; and other kinds and forms of tobacco leaf prepared in such manner as to be suitable for chewing, sniffing, or smoking. Subd.2 Tobacco Related Devices "Tobacco related devices" shall mean any tobacco product as well as a pipe, rolling papers, or other device intentionally designed or intended to be used in a manner which enables the chewing, sniffing, or smoking of tobacco or tobacco products. 1 Subd. 3 Self - Service Merchandising "Self- Service Merchandising" shall mean open displays of tobacco, tobacco products, or tobacco related devices in any manner where any person shall have access to the tobacco, tobacco products, or tobacco related devices, without the assistance or intervention of the licensee or the licensee's employee. The assistance or intervention shall entail the actual physical exchange of the tobacco, tobacco product, or tobacco related device between the customer and the licensee or employee. Self - service merchandising shall not include vending machines. Subd. 4 Vending Machines "Vending Machine" shall mean any mechanical, electric or electronic, or other type of device which dispenses tobacco, tobacco products, or tobacco related devices upon the insertion of money, tokens, or other form of payment directly into the machine by the person seeking to purchase the tobacco, tobacco product, or tobacco related device. Subd. 5 Individually Packaged "Individually packaged" shall mean the practice of selling any tobacco or tobacco product wrapped individually for sale. Individually wrapped tobacco and tobacco products shall include, but not be limited to, single cigarette packs, single bags or cans of loose tobacco in any form, and single cans or other packing of snuff or chewing tobacco. Cartons or other packaging containing more than a single pack or other container as described in this subdivision shall not be considered individually packaged. Subd. 6 Loo ie . "Loosies" shall mean the common term used to refer to a single or individually packaged cigarette. Subd. 7 Minor "Minor" shall mean any natural person who has not yet reached the age of eighteen (18) years. Subd. 8 Retail Establishment "Retail establishment" shall mean any place of business where tobacco, tobacco products, or tobacco related devices are available for sale to the general public. Retail establishment shall include, but not be limited to, grocery stores, convenience stores and restaurants. Subd. 9 Moveable Place of Business "Moveable Place of Business" shall refer to any form of business operated out of a truck, van, automobile, or other type of vehicle or transportable shelter and not a fixed address, store front or other permanent type of structure authorized for sales transactions. Subd. 10 Sale. A "sale" shall mean any transfer of goods for money, trade, barter, or other consideration. 2 Subd. 11 Compliance Checks "Compliance checks" shall mean the system the city uses to investigate and ensure that those authorized to sell tobacco, tobacco products, and tobacco related devices are following and complying with the requirements of this ordinance. Compliance checks shall involve the use of minors as authorized by this ordinance. Compliance checks shall also mean the use of minors who attempt to purchase tobacco, tobacco products, or tobacco related devices for educational, research and training purposes as authorized by State and Federal laws. Other units of government for the purpose of enforcing appropriate Federal, State, or local laws may also conduct compliance checks and regulations relating to tobacco, tobacco products and tobacco related devices. 66.03 License Required No person shall sell or offer to sell any tobacco, tobacco products, or tobacco related device without first having obtained a license to do so from the city. Subd. 1 2 lication for License An application for a license to sell tobacco, tobacco products, or tobacco related devices shall be made on a form provided by the city. The application shall contain the full name of the applicant, the applicant's residential and business addresses and telephone numbers, the name of the business for which the license is sought, and any additional information the city deems necessary. Upon receipt of a completed application, the city clerk shall forward the application to the council for action during a regularly scheduled council meeting. If the clerk shall determine that an application is incomplete, he or she shall return the application to the applicant with notice of the information necessary to make the application complete. Subd. 2 Action The council may either approve or deny the license, or it may delay action for a reasonable amount of time to complete any investigation of the application or the applicant it deems necessary. If the council shall approve the license, the clerk shall issue the license to the applicant. If the council denies the license, notice of the denial shall be given to the applicant along with notice of the applicant's right to appeal the council's decision. Subd. 3 Term All licenses issued under this ordinance will expire December 31, of the year the license was purchased. Subd. 4 Suspension or Revocation Any license under this ordinance may be revoked or suspended as deemed necessary by the Council. Subd. 5 Tr r . All licenses issued under this ordinance shall be valid only on the premises for which the license was issued and only for the person (s) to whom the license was issued. No transfer of any license to another location or person or entity shall be valid without the prior approval of the council. The licensee shall not be entitled to a refund of the license fee upon revocation or voluntarily ceasing the licensed activity. 3 Subd. 6 Disnlay All licenses shall be posted and displayed in plain view of the general public on the licensed premise. Subd. 7 Renewals The renewal of a license issued under this section shall be handled in the same manner as the original application. The request for a renewal shall be made at least thirty days but no more than sixty days before the expiration of the current license. The issuance of a license issued under this ordinance shall be considered a privilege and not an absolute right of the applicant and shall not entitle the holder to an automatic renewal of the license. 66.04 Fees No license shall be issued under this ordinance until the appropriate license fee is paid in full. The fee for a license under this ordinance shall be determined by resolution of the City Council. 66.05 Basis for Denial of License The following shall be grounds for denying the issuance or renewal of a license under this ordinance; however, except as may otherwise be provided by law, the existence of any particular ground for denial does not mean that the city must deny the license. If a license is mistakenly issued or renewed to a person, it shall be revoked upon the discovery that the person was ineligible for the license under this Section: A. The applicant is under the age of 18 years. B. The applicant has been convicted within the past five years of any violation of a Federal, State or local law, ordinance provision, or other regulation relating to tobacco or tobacco products or tobacco related devices. C. The applicant has had a license to sell tobacco, tobacco products, or tobacco related devices revoked within the preceding twelve months of the date of application. D. The applicant fails to provide any information required on the application, or provides false or misleading information. E. The applicant is prohibited by Federal, State, or other local law, ordinance, or other regulation, from holding such a license. 66.06 Prohibited Sales It shall be a violation of this ordinance for any person to sell or offer to sell any tobacco, tobacco product, or tobacco related device: A. to any person under the age of eighteen (I8) years. B. By means of any type of vending machine, except as may otherwise be provided in this ordinance. 4 C. By means of self - service methods whereby the customer does not need to make a verbal or written request to an employee of the licensed premise in order to receive the tobacco, tobacco products, or tobacco related devices and whereby there is not a physical exchange of tobacco, tobacco products, or tobacco related device between the licensee or the licensee's employee, and the customer. D. By means of loosies as defined in Section 66.02 Subd. 6 of this ordinance. E. Containing opium, morphine, jimpson weed, Bella donna, strychnos, cocaine, marijuana, or other deleterious, hallucinogenic, toxic, or controlled substances except nicotine and other substances found naturally in tobacco or added as part of an otherwise lawful manufacturing process. F. By any other means, to any other person, or in any other manner of form prohibited by Federal, State, or other local law, ordinance provision, or other regulation. 66.07 Vending Machines It shall be unlawful for any person licensed under this ordinance to allow the sale of tobacco, tobacco products, or tobacco related devices by the means of a vending machine unless minors are at all rimes prohibited from entering the licensed establishment. 66.08 Self- Service Sales It shall be unlawful for a licensee under this ordinance to allow the sale of tobacco, tobacco products, or tobacco related devices by any means whereby the customer may have access to such items without having to request the item from the licensee or the licensee's employee and whereby there is not a physical exchange of the tobacco, tobacco products, or the tobacco related devices between the licensee or his or her clerk and the customer. All tobacco, tobacco products, and tobacco related devices shall either be stored behind a counter or other area, not freely accessible to customers, or in a case or other storage unit not left open and accessible to the general public. Any retailer selling tobacco, tobacco products, or tobacco related devices at the time this ordinance is adopted shall comply with this Section within 90 days. Self- service sales restriction shall not apply to retail stores which derive at least 90% of their revenue from tobacco and tobacco related products and which cannot be entered at any time by a person(s) younger than 18 years of age. 66.09 Responsibility All licensees under this ordinance shall be responsible for the actions of their employees in regard to the sale of tobacco, tobacco products, or tobacco related devices on the licensed premises and the We of such an item by an employee shall be considered a sale by the license holder. Nothing in this section shall be construed as prohibiting the City from also subjecting the clerk to whatever penalties are appropriate under this Ordinance, State or Federal law, or other applicable law or regulation. 66.10 Compliance Checks and Inspections All licensed premises shall be open to inspection by the city police or other authorized city official during regular business hours. From time to time, but at least once per year, the city shall conduct compliance checks by 5 engaging, with the written consent of their parents or guardians, minors over the age of fifteen (15) years but less than eighteen (18) years, to enter the licensed premise to attempt to purchase tobacco, tobacco products, or tobacco related devices. Minors used for the purpose of compliance checks shall be supervised by city designated law enforcement officers or other designated city personnel. Minors used for compliance checks shall not be guilty of unlawful possession of tobacco, tobacco products, or tobacco related devices when such items are obtained as a part of the compliance check. No minor used in compliance checks shall attempt to use a false identification misrepresenting the minor's age, and all minors lawfully engaged in a compliance check shall answer all questions about the minor's age asked by the licensee or his or her employee and shall produce any identification, if any exists, for which he or she is asked. Nothing in this Section shall prohibit compliance checks authorized by State or Federal laws for educational, research, or training purposes, or required for the enforcement of a particular State or Federal law. 66.11 Other illegW Acts Unless otherwise provided, the following acts shall be a violation of this ordinance. Subd. 1 Illegal Sales It shall be a violation of this ordinance for any person to sell or otherwise provide any tobacco, tobacco product, or tobacco related device to any minor. Subd. 2 Illegal Possession It shall be a violation of this ordinance for any minor to have in his or her possession any tobacco, tobacco product, or tobacco related device. This subdivision shall not apply to minors lawfully involved in a compliance check. Subd. 3 Illegal Use. It shall be a violation of this ordinance of any minor to smoke, chew, sniff, or otherwise use any tobacco product, or tobacco related device Subd. 4 Illegal Procurement It shall be a violation of this ordinance for any minor to purchase or attempt to purchase or otherwise obtain any tobacco, tobacco product, or tobacco related device, and it shall be a violation of this ordinance for any person to purchase or otherwise obtain such items on behalf of a minor. It shall further be a violation for any person to coerce or attempt to coerce a minor to illegally purchase or otherwise obtain or use any tobacco, tobacco product, or tobacco related device. This subdivision shall not apply to minors lawfully involved in a compliance check. Subd. 5 Use of False Identification It shall be a violation of this ordinance for any minor to attempt to disguise his or her true age by the use of a false form of identification, whether the identification is that of another person or one on which the age of the person has been modified or tampered with to represent an age older than the actual age of the person. 66.12 Violations Subd. 1 Notice. Upon discovery of a suspected violation, the alleged violator shall 6 be issued, either personally or by mail, a citation that sets forth the alleged violation and which shall inform the alleged violator of his or her right to be heard on the accusation. Subd. 2 Hearing If a person accused of violating this ordinance so requests, a hearing shall be scheduled, the time and place of which shall be determined by Anoka County. Subd. 3 Hearings Officer Anoka County shall serve as the hearing officer. Subd. 4 Decision If the hearing officer determines that a violation of this ordinance did occur, the decision, along with the hearing officer's reasons for finding a violation and the penalty to be imposed under Section 66.13 of this ordinance or as the court rules, shall be recorded in writing, a copy of which shall be provided to the accused violator, their parent or legal guardian. Likewise, if the hearing officer finds that no violation occurred or finds grounds for not imposing any penalty, such findings shall be recorded and a copy provided to the acquitted accused violator, their parent or legal guardian. Subd. 5 Appeals Appeals of any decision made by the hearing officer shall be filed in the district court for the city in which the alleged violation occurred. Subd. 6 Misdemeanor Prosecution Nothing in this Section shall prohibit the City from seeking prosecution as a misdemeanor for any alleged violation of this ordinance. If the City elects to seek misdemeanor prosecution, no administrative penalty shall be imposed. Subd. 7 Continued Violation Each violation, and every day in which a violation occurs or continues, shall constitute a separate offense. 66.13 Penalties. Subd. 1 Licensees and Em IIooyees Any licensee, and any employee of a licensee, found to have violated this ordinance shall be charged an administrative fine which shall be determined by resolution of the City Council for a first violation of this ordinance; for a second offense at the same licensed premises within a twenty -four month period; and/or a third or subsequent offense at the same location within a twenty -four month period. A fine shall be determined by resolution of the City Council. In addition, after the third offense, the license shall be suspended for not less than seven days. Subd. 2 Other Individuals Other individuals, other than minors regulated by subdivision 3 of this subsection, found to be in violation of this ordinance shall be charged an administrative fee set by resolution of the City Council. Subd. 3 Misdemeanor Nothing in this Section shall prohibit the City from seeking prosecution as a misdemeanor for any violation of this ordinance. 7 66.14 Exceptions and Defenses Nothing in this ordinance shall prevent the providing of tobacco, tobacco products, or tobacco related devices to a minor as part of a lawfully recognized religious, spiritual, or cultural ceremony. It shall be an affirmative defense to the violation of this ordinance for a person to have reasonably relied on proof of age as described by State law. 66.15 Severabilit_ and Savings Clause If any section or portion of this ordinance shall be found unconstitutional or otherwise invalid or unenforceable by a court of competent jurisdiction, that finding shall not serve as a invalidation or effect the validity and enforceability of any other section or provision of this ordinance. 66.16 Effective Date This ordinance shall take effect the day following publication in the city's official newspaper. Mayor Tom Wilharber Attest: Ry -Chet Gaustad, CMC City Clerk 8 MEMO DATE June 5, 1998 TO Honorable Mayor and Council FROM : Jim March RE Starfire Gymnastics The Planning and Zoning Commission reviewed the sketch plan for a proposed 14,520 square foot gymnastics facility proposed for construction on the site south of Eagle Trucking. A public hearing was held the same evening in regards to this site being rezoned as Industrial. There were many people in attendance at the hearing to comment upon the site plan. The primary concern was that the property not be rezoned to industrial. The adjoining residential property owners in attendance were pleased with a gymnastics training center being proposed for the site. Resident concerns revolved around landscaping and drainage from the site. Adequate lighting for safety was also discussed. The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended that this proposal be allowed with a special use permit. The consensus was that an additional public hearing was not necessary, since the residents on Cottonwood Court were sent a notice in regards to the rezoning proposal. The Commission also recommended that the property be maintained as commercial. I am expecting a review of the sketch plan at, the Council meeting on June 10th. The special use permit for the facility could be issued on June 24th, if the grading, landscape plan and Rice Creek Watershed District permits are received in adequate time for a thorough review. / T 7 / / -_ REMAINING OUTLOT C PARCEL �3 AND 4 PARCEL 2 PARCEL 1 DRANPGE —__ , . ter - I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I EWUNE POKING AS I INtrwrco Ex orsNEO rrrr r' I UNr I . it ! 111 1 14,520 SO. FT. GYMNASTICS CENTER IIII f 1 I I 1 11(1 s'_o• � � � i I fill 1 I fill ! Irll 'l if f _ II = - -- All - - - -� -_- - - - - - - -- -- - - -- - - - - -- - -- - - - -- -- owwu[usEUENr� -- COUNTY ROAD 54 1 SITE PLAN W ® p ® 1 -- 30 0 r - � - - --� -, <�,� � �� EAST ELEVATION �y t e/ ✓ 'fle 1880 Mai Street 0 C ent e rvi(!e, MN 5 Esta6Ctsked 1857 (612) 429 -3232 • Fax (612) 429 -8629 STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF ANOKA CITY OF CENTERVILLE PLEASE TAKE NOTICE the City Council of the City of Centerville will host a Joint Meeting with the Centerville Planning Commission, Park and Recreation Committee, and the Economic Development Committee and Resource Strategies on Tuesday, June 23, 1998, 7:00 pm at City Hall, 1880 Main Street. This gathering is open to the public and all are invited to attend. The purpose of this meeting is to discuss the concepts behind mixed use zoning and to discuss other City business. Please contact the City Clerk at 429 -3232 if you have questions. DATED: J e 3, 1998 SIGNED: IkiS' Iga ll i Ry- 'hel Gaustad, CMC City Clerk ORDINANCE NO. 206 " � !Y ' <�. Lyn.. t•] AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING A GENERAL POLICY RELATING TO LOCAL IMPROVEMENTS AND SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS 0 The Council of the City of Falcon Heights, /Minnesota ordains: 1. Section I. Definiti For purposes of this ordinance, the words below shall have the meanings given to them in this section: Subdivision 1. Local Improvements Local improvement shall mean a public improvement such as the construction of curbs and gutters, construction or reconstruction of collector or residential streets, the construction of storm sewers, instal- lation and maintenance of street lighting systems and other similar projects described herein. Subdivision 2. Petition Petition shall mean a written document presented to the City Council for purposes related to a local improvement. A petition shall contain a clear statement of its purposes on the top of each page upon which signatures appear purporting to validate the same. All signatures shall be accompanied by the address of the signator, the date of the signature and a printing of the signatur's name. 2. Section 2. Initiation of Improvements Subdivision 1. Petition A local improvement may be initiated by a petition of at least 51% of the benefitted property owners. A benefitted parcel can have only one signature. The petition shall be presented to the Clerk- Administrator who shall place it on the agenda at the next available Council meeting for its consideration. The Council shall review the petition, as to its adequacy under this ordinance. If the Council finds that it meets the criteria herein, it may adopt a resolution by affirmative vote of the majority of all Council members to undertake the project. Subdivision 2. Council Resolution As an alternative to the method prescribed in Subdivision 1 above, a local improve- ment may be initiated by a resolution adopted by a four- fifths affirmative vote of all Council members and a statement of need from the City Engineer. �j Subdivision 3. Report of City Engineer When local ` improvements are initiated pursuant to either Subdivision 1 or Subdivision 2 above, the Council shall direct the City Engineer to undertake a study and make a report outlining the nature, scope and feasibility of the proposed improvements, a cost estimate, a recommendation regarding benefitted property and any other information deemed necessary or appropriate by the Council. Subdivision 4. Hearing Regarding Proposed Improvements Following receipt by the Council of the Engineer's report described in Subdivision 3 above, the Council shall set a public hearing on the proposed improvements in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Section 429.031. 2 Subdivision 5. Ordering Improvements and Advertising : p for Bids At any time within six months following the hearing r described in Subdivision 4 above, the Council may by resolution order the improvements. If the improvements were initiated by petition, a majority vote is needed. In the absence of a peti- tion, a four- fifths vote is required to order the improvements. When the proposed improvement is ordered by the Council, the Council may, by resolution, at any time within one year follow- ing the ordering of the improvement, proceed on the improvement by advertising for bids and letting an appropriate contract in accordance with Minn. Stat. §429.041. 3. Section 3. Apportionment of Cost The cost of improve- ments may be assessed where appropriate upon property benefitted by the improvement, based on the benefits received, whether or not _ the property abutts v:_ the improvement and whether or not any part of the cost of the improvement is paid from the County, StateAid Highwav Fund, the Municipal State -Aid Street Fund, or the Trunk Highway Fund in accordance with the rules described in Sections 5 through 12 of this Ordinance. 4. Section 4. Assessment Procedure In addition to the provisions of this Ordinance, assessments shall be made in compliance with the assessment procedures desc'ribed in Minn. Stat. §429.061 relating to the notice and conduct of assessment hearings, the adoption of proposed assessments, the transmission of certified assessment rolls to the County Auditor and other related matters. 3 5. Section 5. Classification of Local Improvement Projects Subdivision I. In General Local improvements are r divided into the three classes specified in the following subdivisions according to their respective benefits to the City as a whole and to property specially served by the improvement: Class A . Class A improvements are those which are of general benefit to the City at large, including, by way of illustration, (1) public buildings; (2) public parks, playgrounds, or recreational facilities; (3) street lighting systems; and (4) off-street parking facilities. Any such improvements shall be financed from general City funds and not from special assessments. Class B . Class B improvements are those which are of both general benW= it to the City at lane as well as special benefit to abutting or nearby property. Clasp B improvements include (1) construction or recon- struction of collector or arterial streets *; (2) the construction of curb and gutter on collector or arterial streets. * COLLECTOR STREETS are those streets generally considered to collect traffic from residential streets or alleys and include those named on the City's official thoroughfare map. ARTERIAL STREETS are those streets generally considered to collect traffic from collector streets and include those named on the City's official thoroughfare map. 4 4 Class C . Class C improvements are those which are primarily, if not exclusively, of benefit to property abutting or in the area of the improvement, including (1) the construction of sidewalks and bicycle paths; (2) the construction of storm sewers, (3) the construction or reconstruction of residential streets and alleys; and (4) the construction of curb and gutters on residential streets. 6. Section 6. Financing Class B and C Improvements It is the policy of the City of Falcon Heights to finance Class B and C improvements by the methods prescribed in Sections 7, 8 and 9 below. The apportionment of the cost between benefitted property and the City at large and the method of levying assessments pre - :scribed in those sections shall be followed in earn case unless the Council, by resolution, finds that because of special. circum- stances stated in the resolution, a different policy is necessary or desirable in the particular case. Any local improvement described in Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429 and not placed in Class A, S or C by Section 2 above, shall be financed as the Council determines to be most feasible and equitable in each case. 7. Section 7. Assessment Rules for Class B Improvements Subdivision 1. Collector or Arterial, Street Con- struction or Reconstruction When a collector or arterial street is constructed or reconstructed, 50% of the costs of the improvements shall be paid from the general fund and 50% shall be 5 V assessed to benefitted property. However, properties fronting on c� arterial or collector streets shall be assessed for the costs of improvements as described in Subdivision 3 below. As to properties not fronting on collector or arterial streets, the costs of construction or reconstruction to be assessed shall be assessed on the basis of frontage on streets in the benefitted area. The benefitted area shall be defined by the City Engineer in accordance with the following illustration: RESIDENTIAL STREET p 0 2 I - 12 it 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 12 II w o r � U � w U 23 24 c 13 14 15 16 17 Is 19 20 21 22 23 ]24 a i3 14 w r RESIDENTIAL STREET a LOTS TO BE ASSESSED FOR LOTS TO BE ASSESSED FOR COLLECTOR I CONSTRUCTION ARTERIAL OR COLLECTOR II OR RECONSTRUCTION I CONSTRUCTION OR RECONSTRUCTION Residential property containing other than single family residences shall be assessed at a rate one and one -half times the rate assessed single family residential property. Commercial property shall be assessed at a rate two times the single family residential rate. 6 Subdivision 2. Curbs and Gutters on Collector or Arterial Streets Costs of these improvements shall be assessed in a manner identical to that described in Subdivision 1 above for collector or arterial street construction or reconstruction except as to property fronting on collector or arterial streets which shall be assessed as described in Subdivision 3 below. Corner lots with side yards abutting collector or arterial streets shall be assessed SO$ of the costs of curbs and gutters determined on a linear foot basis measured against the side yard. Subdivision 3. Assessment of Properties Fronting on Arterial or Collector Streets Properties with frontage on arterial or collector streets shall be assessed on a frontage basis. The costs to be assessed shall be determined by the City Engineer and shall not exceed an amount sufficient to construct or reconstruct a residential street. 3. Section H. Assessment Rules for Class C Improvements Subdivision 1. Storm Sewers One hundred percent of the cost of constructing storm sewers shall be assessed against the property in the area served by the sewer as determined by the City Engineer on the basis of the square footage of the property so served. The area to be assessed shall be determined by the Engineer on the basis of topographical maps and other pertinent data. Multi -unit residential property shall be assessed at one and one -half times the single family residential rate and 7 commercial property shall be assessed at two and one -half times the single family residential rate. Subdivision 2. Residential Street Construction and Reconstruction Ninety percent (908) of the cost of construction or reconstruction of residential streets shall be assessed to abutting property owners on the basis of frontage. The remaining 108 shall be paid from the general fund. Side yards abutting residential streets shall be assessed 508 of the costs of street construction and reconstruc- tion on a linear foot basis measured against the side yard. Subdivision 3. Alleys and Curb and Gutters on Residential Streets One hundred percent (100 %) of the cost of construction or reconstruction of alleys and of curbs and gutters (� on residential streets shall be assessed to abutting property owners on the basis of frontage. Corner lots with side yards abutting residential streets shall be assessed 508 of the costs of curb and gutters determined on a linear foot basis measured against the side yard. 9. Section 9. Special Rules Subdivision 1. Intersections In the case of any kind of street improvement, including curbs and gutters, intersection costs shall be included as part of the total assessable costs to be levied in accordance with the rules in this Ordinance. Subdivision 2. Adjusted frontage When the amount of an assessment is determined by frontage, an equivalent front footage shall be determined according to the following rules when f 8 an irregular lot requires such an adjustment to maintain fairness in the assessment: (a) front footage shall be measured at setback on cul de sacs and sharply curved streets and irregular shaped lots; (b) equivalent front footage shall be determined by dividing the square footage of the lot by the general lot depth of the sub- division for pie - shaped lots and irregular shaped lots where other rules do not apply; (c) where frontage curves so greatly as to give a general appearance of a corner, the lot shall be considered a corner lot and equivalent front footage, as well as side footage where required, determined on the basis of an irregularly shaped lot and (d) where a lot consists of a combination of rectangular and pie- shaped or irregular portions, the equivalent front footage shall be determined as the sum of the straight front footage plus the remainder in accordance with applicable rules. — 10. Section 10. Federal, State and County Aid Use If the City receives financial assistance from the federal, state or county governments to defray a portion of the cost of a street improvement project, such aid may be used to reduce the share of the project costs. 11. Section 11. Certification of Assessments After the adoption of any special assessment by the Council, the Clerk - Administrator shall transmit a certified duplicate of the assessment roll with each installment, including interest, set forth separately to the County auditor to be extended on the proper tax lists of the County. ` ( 1 9 ic. aecrion i<. aiiecrive ua �e . Lniy �ruinance Sna1L oe a ceccive zrom and after its passage and publication. ADOPTED by the City Council this 25th day of July, 1984 I Ronald C. Egg ., Mayor l ATTEST: Dewan B, Barnes, Clerk Administrator f Regular City Council Meeting of .Tuley 25, 1984 CITY OF NORTH BRANCH ASSESSMENT POLICY (Adopted zu.gust 28, 1984) RESOLUTION 84 -52 A RESOLUTION ADOPTING AN ASSESSMENT POLICY WHEREAS, the City of North Branch has been making public improvements; and WHEREAS, no formal policy has existed to deal with assess- ments in an equitable and like manner; and WHEREAS, A draft policy was prepared, reviewed, and changes were made to provide for an acceptable policy; and WHEREAS, the final policy has been prepared for acceptance. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the North Branch City Council approves and adopts the assessment policy dated August 28, 1984, and that said policy will remain as a Policy to be flexible with regard to: 1. Maintaining equitability to those assessed. 2. Recognition that not all situations of assess- ments are alike. 3. Realization that strict application of the polio,' could result in assessment costs greater than benefit and the ability to make adjustments to deal with those situations. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Section 16; Determination of Policy on Improvements, be incorporated to provide a track record of how assessments have been apportioned to give both Council and staff a greater understanding of this policy. Maxine Gregor Ave Bob Streater n v o Bill Lewis Ave Jim Mindrup Aye Roger Thompson Ave , Adopted this 28th day of August, 1984, by the North Branch City Council. Maxi e G egor, Mayor Attest: Joe Ru er , Clerk /Admi or INTRODUCTION This policy manual describes the policies and pro- cedures to be followed by the City of North Branch in. making improvements and levying special assessments to finance such improvements. Legal authority for these policies are provided under State law, specifically in Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429, commonly called the "Local Improvement Code ". Recent court cases have effected cities' ability to finance public improvements. The courts have stated quite clearly that cities do not have an absolute right to assess property for improvements. The assessment to a parcel may not exceed the special benefit (increase in market value) given to the property by the improvement. This requirement has caused cities to exercise care in levying assessments. On the other side of the scale is a growing need for public improvements. The infrastructure (streets and utilities) is constantly aging. As various utility sys- tems grow older, they require greater attention. Cities now face two demands for investment in public improvements: construction to support now development and rehabilitation Of existing systems. This increased demand occurs at a time when cities have less financial resources to apply to public improvements. As a result, many necessary pro- jects have been postponed. The deferring of investment until future years stands to increase long term costs as facilities continue to deteriorate. _ These assessment policies attempt to deal with both concerns. The flexibility built into the policies allow the City Council to more equitably apply assessments in each situation. It also permits the Council to create the best mix of individual property and city wide taxation to encourage needed improvements. The assessment policy manual is intended to be a dynamic document.. As the City Staff gains experience in using the policies, they will begin to develop an administrative guide. The guide will help staff make decisions about applying the policies. It is hoped that all of these elements will combine to produce practical and equitable framework'for public im- provements. TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION CONTENTS PAGE 1 Legislative - Intent ------------------------- - - - - -- 1 2 General Assessment Policies ---------------- - - - - -- 1 3 Distribution of Assessments ---------------- - - - - -- 3 4 Sanitary Sewer ------------- -- ---- --- ------- - - -- -- 5 5 Water Distribution ------------------------- - - - - -- 7 6 Storm Sewer ------- ------- -- -- ----------- -- - - - - - -- 9 7 Streets ---------------- ---- ---- ----------- - -- -- -- 10 8 Sidewalks --------- -- ------ ------- --------- - -- - - -- 12 9 Postponed Assessments ---------------------- - - - - -- 13 10 Apportionment of Assessments Upon Subdivision of Lend -------- - - - - -- 14 11 Supplemental Assessment & Reassessment ----- - - - - -- 14 12 Special Assessments for Current Services --- - - - - -- 14 13 Prepayment of Assessment Certification ----- - - - - -- 15 14 Deferred Assessments ----------------------- - - - - -- 15 15 Local Improvements Process ----------------- - - - - -- 17 ASSESSMENT POLICY SECTION 1 LEGISLATIVE INTENT The policies contained herein establish a procedure for making public improvements and levying special assess- ments pursuant to the requirements of Minnesota Statutes. When an improvement conveys special benefit to properties in a definable area, the City intends to levy special assessments on the benefitted properties to finance such improvements. It is the policy of the City that the amount of the assessment for public improvements should not exceed the special benefit to the property. The City will use the assessment policies to insure that assessments have a reason- able relationship to benefits. Public improvements include the construction or reconstruction of streets, sidewalks, storm sewer, sanitary sewer, water works, street lighting, or any other public improvements allowed by State law. SECTION 2 GENERAL ASSESSMENT POLICIES 1. Initiation of Im provements. Improvements may be initiated by the City Council or by petition of not less than 35% of the affected property owners. Petitions re- questing improvements will be received by Council until the 15th day of August of the year prior to the year of requested construction. (Petitions after this date will be received only upon special consent of the Council.) The City Council, shall, by resolution, determine whether or not the petition has been signed by the required per- centage of owners of the property affected by such petition. 2. Project Cost. The "project cost" of an improvement shall be deemed to include the costs of all necessary con- struction work required to accomplish the improvement, plus expenses incurred or to be incurred in making the improve- ment including engineering, legal, administration, financing, right -of -way acquisition, and other contingent costs. 3. City Cost. Where the project cost of an improvement is not entirely attributable to the need for service to the areas served by said improvement, or where unusual conditions beyond the control of the property owners in the area served by the improvement would result in an inequitable distribu- tion of special assessments, the City, through the use of other funds, may pay such "city costs" which, in the opinion of the City Council, represents those costs not directly attributable to the area served. 1 SECTION 2, cont. GENERAL ASSESSMENT POLICIES, cant. 4. Assessable Cost. The "assessable cost" of an im- provement shall be defined as those costs which, in the opinion of the City Council, are attributable to the need for service in the areas served by the improvement and are not in excess of the special benefit conveyed to the pro- perty by the improvements. Said assessable cost shall be equal to the project.cost of the current project as defined above, minus city cost as defined above, minus other financial assistance applied to the project. 5. Use of Other Funds. If financial assistance is received from the federal government, from the State of Minnesota, or from any other source to defray a portion of the cost of a given improvement, such aid will first be used to reduce the city cost of the improvement. If the financial assistance received is greater than the normal city cost, the remainder of the aid will be used to reduce the special assess- ments against the benefiting properties. Such reductions will be applied on a pro -rata basis. 6. City Property. City owned property, including municipal building sites, parks and playgrounds, but not including public streets and alleys shall be regarded as being assessable or. the same basis as if such property was privately owned. 7. Distribution of Assessments. The assessable costs of the improvement shall be distributed among the affected property owners according to one of the provedures outlined in Section 3. The following shall apply in determining assessable costs: A. "Adjusted frontage" shall be expressed to the nearest foot. B. "Area" shall be defined as the gross area of the parcel or lot which is benefited, in terms of square feet or acres. All property within district boundaries is to be included. District boundaries shall be determined by the Director of Public Works or the City Engineer. C. "Unit" or "Lot ": When the City Council determines that the assessable cost would be more equitably distributed on a "unit" basis, the assessable unit may be the "lot" (i.e., a uniform per lot assessment), REC (Residential Equivalent Connection), or other equitable unit adopted by the Council. D. Measures of dimension, distance, or size shall be based on recorded platting data, wherever possible. 2 SECTION 2, cont. GENERAL ASSESSMENT POLICIES, cont. 8. Application of Policy. In the event the literal application of the provisions outlined herein would result in an inequitable distribution of special assessments, the City Council reserves the right to adjust the policy so as to achieve a more equitable distribution. Such adjustment may be based on current or anticipated land use. SECTION 3 DISTRIBUTION OF ASSESSMENTS Several methods exist for assessing property benefited by local improvement projects. It is the policy of the City to use the method that most equitably distributes the project costs. A description of the methods generally used by the City appears in this section. How these methods will be used in relation to specific types of improvements will be described in later sections. FRONT FOOT METHOD: Improvement costs are commonly dis- tributed according to the "adjusted front footage" of a parcel or lot. In this method, the City determines a rate of assessment per front foot. This rate applies to each parcel as follows: Assessment = Assessment rate per frortfoot X Parcel's adjusted front footage. The City will choose from among the following methods to calculate adjusted front footage based on which method best reflects the benefit received from the improvement. RECTANGULAR INTERIOR LOTS For rectangular interior lots, the footage equals the dimension of the side of the lot abutting the improvement. CUL -DE -SAC LOTS For cul -de -sac lots, one of the following methods applies: (1) Footage equals the lot width at the building setback line; or (2) Footage equals the average of the front and rear lot lines. 3 SECTION 3, cont. FRONT FOOT METHOD, Cont. CURVED FRONTAGE For other lots with curved frontage, one of the following methods applies: (1) Frontage equals lot width at the building setback line; or, (2) Frontage equals lot width at the front lot line. IRREGULAR SHAPED LOTS For lots with irregular shaped frontage equals the average width of the lot. CORNER LOTS When improvements are made to both sides of a corner lot, frontage will be deter- mined by one of the following methods: For Utility Laterals (1) Footage is equal to the longest side or side installed first if done in two distinct projects. (2) When one side of a corner lot has been provided sewer or water benefit and develop- ment occurs at a later date to the other side, that front- age shall be excluded from the adjusted footage. For Street Improvements, Curb & Gutter, Sidewalks (3) Adjusted footage equals 100% of the initial frontage and 50% of the second side. If accomplished on both sides at the same time, adjusted footage is 100% of the longest side and 50% of the shorter side. 4 SECTION 3, cont. DISTRIBUTION OF ASSESSMENTS, cont. AREA METHOD; Assessments may be distributed accord- ing to the gross area of the benefited lot or parcel. The assessable area shall be expressed in terms of the number of acres or the number of square feet subject to assessment. Assessment = Area to be assessed (acres or square feet) X assessment rate per acre or square feet. Where appropriate, an allowance will be made for streets. When the area is platted, the deduction will be for actual and proposed street right -of -way. For unplatted land with no streets platted or proposed, a deduction of 20% of the gross acreage applies as a street credit. WEIGHTED UNIT /LOT METHOD; When the City Council determines that the assessable cost would be more equitably distributed on a unit basis all lots will be reviewed for conformity and a standard lot size will be determined. Any lot which could be divided to form more than one lot shall be given a weighted lot or residential equivalent unit. Each equivalent unit shall be charged with one assessment charge. Assessment = Assessable Cost Residential quiva ent units or Weighted Lots New subdivisions will generally use the unit /lot method or weighted lot method for all improvements. SECTION 4 SANITARY SEWER TRUNK Definition: Trunk sanitary sewer systems SEWER are defined as those improvements necessary SYSTEMS to collect wastewater for treatment. Such improvements include treatment facilities, lift stations and sanitary sewer lines in excess of eight (8) inches in diameter. 1 Assessable Cost: The assessable cost of the trunk sewer system equals up to a maximum of 50% of the total cost of the improvement. The remainder of the trunk costs shall be paid through core connec- tion charges. Distribution of Assessments: It is the policy of the City to distribute the assess- able costs of trunk sanitary sewer systems 5 SECTION 4, cont. SANITARY SEWER, cont. TRUNK across the area benefited by the improve - SEWER ment. Where property has been subdivided SYSTEMS, cont. for residential use, the assessment shall be on a weighted lot basis. Where unplatted or unplatted and subdivided properties occure or zoning for non - residential pur- poses, the assessment will be distributed using the area or weighted lot method. (A 20% reduction in area will be allowed for unsubdivided properties.) Some properties in the benfit area may not have direct access to the sanitary sewer system. Such properties do accrue an immediate benefit from the trunk sewer since the system is available to receive lateral sewer connections which may be initiated by property owner petition. LATERALS Definition: Sanitary sewer laterals are defined as sanitary sewer lines eight (8) inches in diameter or less extending from the trunk sewer and designed to serve individual properties. Assessable Cost: The assessable cost for sanitary sewer laterals equals the entire project cost. Distribution of Assessments: Unless other- wise specified by the Council, assessable costs will be distributed to benefited property on an adjusted frontage basis. Assessments for sanitary sewer laterals will be levied at the same time against all benefited property in the area, even if some parcels do not connect to the system at the time of assessment. Trunk as a Lateral: Where a trunk sewer main serves as a lateral (provides ser- vice to abutting property), a lateral benefit assessment will be levied. Assess- ment rate shall be equivalent to the cost of the trunk installation minus the charge for the oversizing. The assessment for lateral benefit from a trunk will be levied at the time of improvement. The City Council reserves the right to postpone the assessment for undeveloped property. 6 SECTION 4, cont. SANITARY SEWER, cont.____ RECONSTRUCTION The life expectancy for sanitary sewers is 40 years. If during the first 20 years after construction, reconstruction is re- quired, the City shall bear 100% of the costs. Between 20 and 40 years of sewer life, any.reconstruction project costs shall be assessable on a pro -rata basis. 5% for each additional year. After 40 years, assessable costs equal the entire project cost. SECTION 5 WATER DISTRIBUTION POLICY It is recognized that water distribution improvements benefit both the individual property and the entire water system. The improvements bring water service to individual parcels while also improving flow and pressure conditions at other locations. In distributing assessments, the City Council will try to strike a balance between individual and system- wide benfits. TRUNK Definition: Trunk water systems are de- WATER fined as those improvements necessary to SYSTEMS provide, purify and distribute water throughout the City. Such improvements shall include treatment facilities, wells, hydrants, water towers and watermains eight (8) inches in diameter or greater. Assessable Cost: The assessable cost of a trunk water facility equals up to a maximum of 50% of the total cost of the improvement. The remainder of the trunk costs shall be paid through core connec- tion charges. 7 SECTION 5, cont. WATER DISTRIBUTION, cont. TRUNK Distribution of Assessments: It is the WATER policy of the City to distribute the SYSTEMS, Cont. assessable costs of trunk water facilities across the area to be benefited by the improvement. Where property has been subdivided for residential use, the assess- ment shall be on a weighted lot basis. Where unplatted or unplatted and subdivided properties occur or zoning for non - residential purposes, the assessment will be distributed using the area or weighted lot method (a 20% reduction in area will be allowed for un- subdivided properties.) Some properties in the benefit area may not have direct access to the water distribution system. Such properties do accrue on im- mediate benefit from the trunk water system since it is available to receive water connection at a later date which may be initiated by property owner petition. RECONSTRUCTION The life expectancy for watermain is 40 years. If during the first 20 years after construction, reconstruction is required the City shall bear 100% of the costs. Between 20 and 40 years of watermain life any reconstruction project costs shall be assessable on a pro -rata basis. 5% for each additional year. After 40 years, assessable costs equal the entire project cost. LATERALS Definition: Lateral water lines are de- fined as watermains of a size six (6) inches or less in diameter. Assessable Costs: The assessable cost of laterals equals the entire project cost of lateral improvements. 8 SECTION 6 STORM SEWER POLICY It is the policy of the City to provide storm sewer systems through a property tax levy. However, in new subdivisions or areas where benefit can be well defined an assessment proceeding may be used. STORM Definition: Storm sewer systems are de- SEWER fined as storm sewer pipes, open drainage SYSTEMS ways, storage sites and ponding areas designed to provide for the control of storm water and ground water over a par- ticular area. Assessable Costs: The assessable cost of storm sewer systems shall be a minimum of 20% of the total cost of the improvement. Where system oversizing is needed to ac- comodate growth, a minimum assessment is applied. Where system oversizing is due to the nature of individual properties a greater share of the project costs shall be an assessable cost. Storm sewers servic- ing private parcels or lots shall be con- sidered private storm sewers and the cost shall be borne entirely by those tracts or parcels benefiting. Distribution of Assessments: The City shall determine the area to be benefited by the storm sewer improvement. Assessable costs for such improvements shall be dis- tributed on an area, weighted unit, or lot basis to benefited properties. Addition Laterals: Should smaller storm sewer laterals and catch basins be required with street construction, these additional costs may be included in the street con- struction assessment. 114PROVEMENT The City may adopt an ordinance creating DISTRICT a storm sewer improvement tax district, pursuant to the requirements of Minnesota Statutes 444.16 - 444.21. The purpose of such a district will be to provide for the financing of storm sewer improvements. 9 SECTION 7 STREETS STREET Definition: Street construction is defined CONSTRUCTION as the initial installation of a permanent street into an area, consisting of all necessary grading, base, drainage, hard surfacing (such as bituminous or concrete), and curb and gutter. Policy: Street construction will occur only after all utilities and utility ser- vice lines have been installed to serve each known and assumed location. No street construction shall be approved for less than both sides of a street except as neces- sary to complete the improvement of a block which has previous partial completion. Typical street design standards are as follows: Residential areas: "7 -ton" design normally 24 feet in width. Commercial and Industrial areas: "9 -ton" design normally 44 feet in width measured between the faces of curbing Assessable Cost: The assessable cost equals the entire project cost for the street con - struction including intersections, alley openings and street openings. Distribution of Assessments: The assessable costs for street construction shall be distributed among benefited properties on an adjusted frontage basis, except (1) in the case of improvements to irregular shaped or cul -de -sac lots where assessable costs can more equitable be spread on a lot basis or (2) unless otherwise specified by the City Council. Additional Capacity: The City shall pay the cost for extra width and strength when the Council determines such additional capacity is necessary. If the property owner(s) request or require additional width or strength, the cost of such addi- tional capacity shall be borne by the property owner(s). 10 SECTION 7, cont. STREETS, cont. STREET Definition: Street reconstruction is de- RECONSTRUCTION fined as the rehabilitation of an existing street. Assessable Cost: The life expectancy for the construction of new streets is twenty .(20) years. If during the first ten (10) years after construction, reconstruction is required, then the project cost shall be borne by the City. Between ten and twenty years of street life any reconstruction projects casts shall be assessable on a pro -rata basis. 10% for each additional year. After twenty years, assessable costs equal the entire project cost. Distribution of Assessments: Unless other - wise specified by the Council, the assessable costs shall be distributed on an adjusted frontage basis. RESURFACING Definition: Resurfacing is defined as the act of prolonging street life by applying a sealcoat of oil and pea rock or other materia . Bituminous overlayment of up to lz inch is also considered resurfacing. Policy: It is the policy at this point in time to provide street resurfacing through a general tax levy. If extenuating cir- cumstances exist the policy may be altered to assess for a portion of bituminous over - layment. Assessable Cost: The assessable cost equals 25% of the project costs for over - layment. Distribution of Assessments: Assessable costs shall be distributed using either the area or the lot method. 11 SECTION 8 SIDEWALKS CONSTRUCTION Definition: Sidewalks are defined as a path or area parallel to the street for use by pedestrians. Policy: The City Council shall determine where sidewalks will be constructed. New sidewalks must be constructed to meet city standards = width - 4 ft., thickness - 4 in., and strength capacity - 4,000 lbs. per square inch. It shall be the responsibility of property owner to keep sidewalks in good condition as described in the City Code. Assessable Cost: The assessable cost equals the entire cost of sidewalk con- struction, except that the City will pay for that portion of the sidewalk attrib- utable to intersections and alley cross- ings. - Distribution of Assessments: The total cost for initial installation of new side- walks shall be assessed on a front foot basis. The assessment will be levied on the property which abuts the sidewalk on a cost per square foot of sidewalk con- struction. No credit will be given to cul -de -sac or irregularly shaped lots. REPLACEMENT Policy: If a sidewalk is in need of re- placement, the replacement cost will be borne by the property owner. 12 SECTION 8, cont. SIDEWALKS, cont. IMPROVEMENT Polciy: Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes DISTRICT 435.44, the City Council by ordinance may establish a sidewalk improvement dis- trict. The purpose of such district is to provide an area with safe pedestrian walkways to and from schools, school bus stops, public transportation facilities, and other neighborhood and community facilities. Improvements may include both construction and repair. Assessable Cost: The Council may elect to make all or part of the project costs assessable costs. Distribution of Assessments: The assessable cost may be apportioned to all property in the district on a uniform basis as to each classification of property. An indirect benefit assessment may involve all property in the district without regard to location of sidewalks; a direct benefit may be assessed to abutting property for the additional cost of an extra sidewalk width. Assessments may be spread over a five- year period. SECTION 9 POSTPONED ASSESSMENTS 1. If the city advances its own funds to pay for improve- ment costs relating to property abutting on but not initially assessed for the improvement, the City may reimburse itself for all or any portion of this cost by levying assessments against such property upon notice and hearings provided for the assessments at a later date. 2. If the City advances its own funds to pay for improve- ment costs that benefit non - abutting property not initially assessed for it, but able to use it when extensions or other improvements are made, the City may include all or any por- tion of the costs originally advanced into assessments for later improvements if notice to that effect is included in the notice of hearing on the matter of undertaking the later extension or improvement. 13 SECTION 10 APPORTIONMENT OF ASSESSMENTS UPON SUBDIVISION OF LAND If a special assessment is levied against a tract of land which is later subdivided, the installments remaining unpaid can be apportioned among the various lots and parcels in the tract upon a finding that such apportionment will not materially impair collection of the balance due. This may be done upon application of the property owner or by the Council acting upon its own motion, but notice of such apportionment and of the right to appeal must be mailed to or personally served upon all owners of any part of the tract. The Council may, and if the assessment has been pledged towards payment of improvement warrants the Council must, require the owner or owners to furnish surety bonds. SECTION 11 SUPPLEMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND REASSESSMENT The City Council may, subject to legal notice and hearing requirements, make supplemental assessments to correct omissions, errors, or mistakes in the relating to the total cost of the improvement or any other particular item. If an assessment is set aside by a court for any reason or if the Council finds that the assessment or any part of it is excessive or determines on advice of the City Attorney that it is or may be invalid for any reason, the Council may upon notice and hearing as required for the original assessment, make a reassessment or a new assessment as to such parcel or parcels. SECTION 12 SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS FOR CURRENT SERVICES The City Council may provide for the collection of cer- tain service charges as a special assessment against the pro- perty benefitting from the service. Special charges that may be assessed include those for: (1) snow, ice or rubbish removal from sidewalks,weed elimination from streets or pri- vate property; (2) removal or elimination of public health or safety hazards from private property (except hazardous buildings as defined by M.S. 463.15 to 463.26; (3) installa- tion or repair of water service lines; (4) street sprinkling or other dust treatment of streets; (5) the trimming and care of trees and the removal of trees from any street and the treatment and removal of insect - infested or diseased trees on private property; (6) the repair of sidewalks and alleys; (7) the operation of a street lighting system. 14 SECTION 12, cont. SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS FOR CURRENT SERVICES, cont Implementation of this Section must be authorized by the City Code or other ordinance adopted by the Council. Provisions for the levy and collection of the assessment are the same as for other improvements except that any special assessment levied under this Section is payable in no more that ten annual installments, the number to be determined by the Council. The Ordinance adopted under authority of this Section may, at the option of the Council, include provisions for placing primary responsibility upon the property owner or occupant to do the work himself (except in the case of street sprinkling or other dust treatment, alley repair, tree trimming, care, and Yemoval, or the operation of a street lighting system) upon notice before the work is undertaken, and for collection from the property owner or other person served of unpaid charges before they are attached to the tax bill. SECTION 13 PREPAYMENT AND ASSESSMENT CERTIFICATION 1. Partial Prepayment. After the adoption by the City Council of the assessment roll in any local improvement pro- ceeding, the owner of any property specially assessed in the proceeding may, prior to the certification of the assessment of the first installment to the County Auditor, pay to the City Clerk- Treasurer any portion of the assessment. The remaining unpaid balance shall be spread over the period of time established by the Council for installment payment of the assessment. 2. Certification of Assessments. After the adoption Of any special assessment by the Council, the City Clerk - Treasurer shall transmit a certified duplicate of the assess- ment roll with each installment, including interest, set forth separately to the County Auditor on an annual basis to be extended on the proper tax lists of the County. r SECTION 14 DEFERRED ASSESSMENTS 1. Senior Citizens A. Criteria. In determining whether or not a senior citizen is eligible for deferral of special assessment installment payments, the following criteria are established: (1) Senior Citizens special assessment hardship deferral applies to 15 SECTION 14, cant. DEFFERED ASSESSMENTS, cont. Senior Citizens, cont. special assessments levied after the date of the Policy; (2) Senior Citizens special assessment hardship deferral applies to qualifying special assessments against all properties classified as "homestead" pursuant 'to M.S. Chapter 273, where one or more of the owners of such property is 65 years of age or older and it would create a hard- ship for the owner or owners of the property to pay the special assessment installments as they become due; (3) It shall be presumed that a hard- ship exists if: (a) the annual assessment in- stallment exceeds 1% of the previous year's total adjusted gross incomes, for Federal Income Tax purposed, for all owners of the property; in no event shall "total adjusted gross income" include Social Security Benefits, Railroad Retirement Benefits, retirement benefits attributable to employee contributions, disability benefits, per- sonal injury awards. or workmen's compensation pay- ments; and (b) all owners of the property verify, under oath, that they meet the criteria for es- tablishing a hardship by completing an application provided by the City. (4) In cases where exception- al and unusual circumstances exist, the City Council may determine that a hardship exists despite the fact that the minimum income requirements of Section A(3) are not met; such cases shall be decided by the Council on a case by case basis. B. Interest. Interest shall be charged on any assessment deferred pursuant to this Ordinance at a rate equal to the rate charged on other assessments for the particular public improvement project the assessment is financing. C. Termination of Deferment. The option to defer the payment of special assessments pursuant to this Ordinance shall terminate and all installment amounts previously deferred, plus applicable interest, shall become due upon the occurence'of any of the following events: (1) Request of Property owner; (2) Death of property owner 65 years of age or older, providing the surviving owner is otherwise not eligible for the deferral; (3) Sale, transfer or subdivision of the property or any part thereof; (4) The City determines that hardship no longer exists; (5) The property, for any reason, loses its homestead status. 16 SECTION 15 LOCAL IMPROVEMENT PROCESS STEP ACTION 1 PROJECT INITATION: Projects may be initiated in two ways: (1) Petition by 35% of the af- fected property owners; or (2) By order of the City Council. Petitions for improvements must be submitted by August 15.. la PETITION REVIEW: If project is petitioned, The City Council must determine if the peti- tion conforms with the guidelines of M.S.429.035. 2 FEASIBILITY REPORT: The Council instructs the City Engineer to prepare a preliminary report on the proposed improvement. The report will indicate feasibility of proceeding with the im- provement and estimated costs. 3 ACCEPT FEASIBILITY REPORT /CALL FOR HEARING: The City Engineer will submit the freasibility report to the Council. The Council will then schedule a date for a public hearing on the improvement. Notice of hearing iwll be mailed to all affected property owners at least 10 days prior to the hearing date. Notice of hearing will also we published twice in the ECM Post- Review. 4 PUBLIC HEARING ON IMPROVEMENT: The purpose o£ the hearing is to give all interested pro- perty owners a chance to make comment on the proposed improvement. If the project is peti- tioned by 1008 of the affected property owners, then this step may be skipped. 5 ORDER IMPROVEMENT /PREPARATIONS OF PLANS: If the City Council chooses to proceed with the project, then the improvement is ordered. The City Engineer will be directed to prepare the necessary plans and specificatibns_ 6 APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS /ORDERING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS: When the City Engineer has completed the plans and specifications, they will be presented for consideration by the City Council. Upon approval of the plans and specifications, the Council will direct the City Clerk to advertise for bids for making the improvement. At a minimum, the advertisement will be placed in the ECM Post - Review and the Construction Bulletin 17 SECTION 15, cont. LOCAL IMPROVEMENT PROCESS, cont. STEP ACTION 6, cont. The Council shall also set a time for the bid opening. Generally, the City will allow a 30 -day period between calling for bids and opening.bids. 7 ACCEPTING BIDS: At the time and place pre- viously established, the City shall open and review all sealed bids for the improvement. The City may accept and retain all or a por- tion of the bids. The City may also defer awarding the bid for a period of time not to exceed 30 days. The purpose of the delay is to allow Staff time to review the bids. 8 AWARDING BIDS: When the City Council has completed all necessary review and hearings, it may award the bid to the lowest acceptable bidder. 9 CONSTRUCTION: Once the City has entered into a contract with the successful bidder, con - struction of the improvement may begin. 10 O RDER ASSESSMENT ROLL / ASSESSMENT HEARING: If 100% of the affected property owners have not petitioned for the improvement or signed a waiver of rights to appeal, then the City Council shall begin the assessment process. The Council will declare costs to be assessed, order prepartation of the assessment roll and set a date for public hearing on the assess- ments. Notice of hearing shall be published in the ECM Post- Review and mailed to all affected property owners. 11 ASSESSMENT HEARING: The purpose of the hearing is to give property owners information on the amount of assessment and to give them an op- portunity to object to the proposed assessment. Objections may he made at the hearing or sub- mitted in writing prior to or at the hearing. At its descretion, the Council may consider any objection raised to the amount of a pro- posed individual assessment at an adjourned meeting. The purpose of such additional in- quiry is to determine objectively, and in a non-adversary proceeding whether the amount of the assessment exceeds the benefit conveyed to 18 SECTION 15, cont. LOCAL IMPROVEMENT PROCESS, cont. STEP ACTION 11, cont. the property. At such a adjourned meeting, both the City and the property owner will be given the opportunity to present oral and written testimony. 12 ADOPTING ASSESSMENT; Upon determination of final assessment amounts, the Council shall adopt the assessment roll. Any property owner who has formally objected to the assessment has 30 days to appeal the assess- ment to District Court. SECTION 16 DETERMINATION OF POLICY ON IMPROVEMENTS To keep this policy as current as possible and to pro- vide direction for future assessments this section has been added as an administrative section. The purpose is to provide a record of how assessments were applied in accor- dance with this policy. 19 6th STREET 1. Right -o£ -Way a. Assessed 1008 to benefitting property owners. b. Property owner to the west should have been included in 429 hearings. As he does have 60 feet of abutting property and with the dedicated property to the west (part of Northern Oak's property) this property owner will have approximately 295 feet of frontage. C. If he is included, acquisition costs can be divided by all benefitting properties in a more equitable split. This would include both north and south side of 6th, west side of north - south street, east side developers credit. d. This would give a split of right -of -way ac- quisition of $8.20 per foot on the north side of ROW @$4,587, south side of ROW @$4,996, and west side ROW @2,417. (These figures are ROW land costs only - attorney fees and deed update should be included also.) e. Corner -lots, where right -of -way has been provided, will not be assessed for right -of -way acquisition. VoRrFnR.a °� Z srect T C R �LJO 2. Watermain - 8 inch main a. City to pay 508 of oversizing between 6" and 8" as it is a trunk facility. 50% will be paid by benefitting property owners. Core charges for water hookup should pay the City's share of costs. This should be paid by the Utilities Commission. b. Corner lots receive no benefit for water, (at Branch Avenue and 6th). Benefitted property should share costs to receive the utility. C. Fire hydrants are a trunk facility. 508 of the costs for these will be paid by benefitting pro- perty owners. The remaining 50% will be paid by core charges for water hookup. This should be paid by the Utilities Commission d. Service lines are assesses; to benefitting pro - perty on a per each basis. 6th STREET, cont. 3. Sewer - 8 inch a. Sewer is assessed 100% to benefitting properties. b. Corner lots receive no benefit. Benefitted pro- perties to share costs of frontage of corner lots. c. Connection T's to property lines for service will be assessed on a per each basis. 4. Roadway - 32 feet wide, 7 ton design a. 24 feet wide to be assessed to abutting property owners. City to pay difference between 24 and 32 feet. b. Corner lots to receive a 50% credit. City to pay difference. 5th STREET 1. Watermain - 6 inch main a. Fire hydrants are a trunk facility. 50% of the costs for these will be paid by benefitting pro- perty owners. Th.e remaining 508 will he paid by core charges for water hookup. This should be paid by the utilities Commission. b. Corner of 5th and 13th on the north has received no benefit here. Corner of 5th and 14th will receive benefit. Benefitted properties should share costs of frontage of corner lots. C. Service lines are assessed to benefitting pro- perty on a per each basis. 2. Sewer - 8 inch main a. Sewer assessed 1008 to benefitting properties. b. Corner of 5th and 13th on the north has received no benefit. Corner of 5th and 14th will receive benefit. Benefitted properties should share costs of frontage of corner lots. C. Connection T's to property line for service will be assessed on a per each basis.