The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1998-10-28 Packet CITY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 28, 1998 / 6:00 p.m. CALL TO ORDER (X Call PUBLIC HEARING (S) III. APEARANCES ♦ Milo Bennett - 1999 Fire Budget /IV. CONSIDERATION OF MINUTES t August 26, 1998 Council Meeting Minutes PAYMENT OF CLAIMS �1 The City of Centerville October 15 - 28 Centennial Fire District Pay Estimate #2 Parkview Pay Estimate #5 20th Avenue VI. ET AGENDA PETITIONS AND COMPLAIN' VIII. UN NISHED BUSINESS Beuchler Estates Park Dedication Fee Dennis Shudy's proposal BUSINESS Otter Lake Animal Control Contract Swift Construction X. COMMITTEE REPORTS IsAI. AD INISTRATORS REPORT �yL Council Vacancy Procedures Emergency Training XII. CONSENT AGENDA 1. 98 -23 Electing to Continue Participation in the Local Housing Incentive Account Program Under the Metropolitan Livable Communities Act 2. Uniform Building Code Ordinance Amendment XIII. ADJOURNMENT WEEK IN REVIEW Edition # 79 10/19 -10/23 Building Permits this Period = 5 Building Permits YTD = 208 New Homes YTD = 119 The City of Centerville Web Site has had 124 persons view the location since it was launched on October 1, 1998. I have received some very positive a -mails in regards to the site. There have been viewers from around the country and one from the L1K. * Dave Nyberg has indicated that they will now release the electronic information on the development known as the Woods of Clearwater Creek. When this information is received, Bonestroo will be submitting the appropriate permit information for the utilities in this development. * The posts have been installed around the hockey rink at LaMotte Park. The hockey boards will be installed next week. Public works is completing this project. NSP has been contacted in regards to the lighting needs for the park. The Centerville Lions will once again be using the warming house building for the annual Lions Haunted House. The watermain that was run through LaMotte Park has been tested and the line is leak -proof and bacteria free. * The final inspection is scheduled for Friday for the Terminal Transport building in the Industrial Park. * I spoke to Gerald Rehbein on Thursday. The County Bank is scheduled to close on the lot in the commercial area on April 1, 1999. Gerald also has a signed letter from the school district indicating that he will be reimbursed up to $70,000 for the design work on the kindergarten facility to be built in Centerville. He is proceeding with having the building designed. * The EDC committee is going to have a Design Team post meeting Open House at their next regularly scheduled meeting. The meeting is going to be informal. All of the presenters, host families and those that indicated at the meetings that they were interested in helping on a project will be invited to attend to generate ideas and plan for potential project implementation. * Reminder! Council Meeting on October 28, 1998 at 6:00 Special Council Meeting on November 4 at 6:00 (to review election results and hold a budget workshop) Bonestraa, Rosene, Anderlik and Associates. Inc_ is an AfPnnative Actlon/E9ual Opportunity Employer ' Bonestroo Principals Otto G. Bonestroo, P.E. - Joseph C Anderlik, PE. • Marvin L Sorvala. RE. - Richard F Tci ner. PE. - Glenn R. Cook, PE. • Robert G. Schu ¢ht. PE. • Jerry A. Bourdon, P.E. ® Rosene Robert W Rosene. P.E a d Susan M Elberlin, CPA, Serlor Consultants Associate Principals How ard A. Sanford PE • Keith A Gordon. PE. • Robert R. Pfefferle, PE.. A nderlik & Richard W Foster. P.E - Dsvid O Loskota RE. • Robert C Ressek. ALA • Mark A Hanson, PE Michael T Raut arin, PE. • Ted K.Fieid, RE, Kenneth P Anderson, P.E. Mark R. Rails, PE. - A ssociates Sidney P. Will arnson, PE.. L S • Robert F Katsmith • Agues hi Ring - M hael P Rau, RE •i Allan Rick SchmitlC PE. Engineers & Architects Offices SC Paul, Rochester, Vhllmar and St. Cloud, KIN • MIIWaukee, WI LV,bare. iV W W.bnneS[r00. corn WEEK IN REVIEW ENGINEERING ISSUES CITY OF CENTERVILLE October 5, 1998 to October 23, 1998 BRA File No. 616 -GEN PROJECTS IN CONSTRUCTION LAMOTTE PARK • The hockey rink posts will be installed by City personnel and volunteers on October 24th. • Kilmer Electric will not have electric to the building by Halloween. A quote of $16,530 was received on Oct. 22 for lighting of the free skating rink and parking lot. Waiting for NSP to give us a second quote for this work. EAGLE PASS No new issues to report this week. LAKELAND HILLS No new issues to report this week. THE WOODS OF CLEARWATER CREEK Project is complete, except sidewalk, bituminous wear, outlet storm sewer, and bituminous trail. A letter of credit was developed for these items. PROJECTS IN DESIGN BUECHLER ESTATES No new issues to report. FLASHING CROSSWALK LIGHTS ON CSAH 14 Location of easterly light is still in question, due to access easement for property to the north. Rud will draw up permanent easements for each pole when details come together. 2335 West Highway 36 • St. Paul, MN 55113 • 612-636 - 4600 • Fax: 612 -636 -1311 CENTER VILLA Utility and Street plans are nearly complete. Draft plans were given to the City on Oct. 23 A draft development contract was received from City Attorney, Tim Hoeft. 21 AVENUE ROAD CONSTRUCTION No new issues to report. MEMO DATE : October 23, 1998 TO Honorable Mayor and Council FROM: Jim March RE Centennial Fire Department Budget District Fire Chief Milo Bennett is scheduled to appear to present the annual Fire Department budget to the City Council. The budget to be presented is an approximate 2% increase over last years budget. Included in your packet are the handouts that were received at the last Fire Steering Committee meeting that was held on October 13, 1998. Centennial Fire District 7741 Lake Drive Lino Lakes, MN 55014 (651) 784 -7472 NOTICE Steering Committee Meeting October 13, 1998 3:30 P.M. Centennial Fire Station #2 7741 Lake Drive Lino Lakes, MN 55014 Agenda Minutes of January 28, 1998 meeting 1999 Budget Update on activities: 998 Safety Camp V1998 Fire Prevention in schools 98 Storms (and lessons learned) W998 Lino Lakes Public Safety Academy Adjournment Centennial Fire District Steering Committee Meeting Minutes January 28, 1998 The meeting was held at Centennial Fire Station #2 in the training room. The meeting was called to order by Jim Keinath at 3:35 p.m. Role call was taken and the following members were present: Sauna Buckbee — Centerville Representative Tom Wilharber — Centerville Representative Jim March — Centerville City Administrator LeAnn Osbun — Circle Pines Representative Dan Stoltz — Circle Pines Repressentative Jim Keinath — Circle Pines Administrator Andy Neal — Lino Lakes Representative Dave Peechia — Lino Lakes Administrator Milo Bennett — Fire Chief Des Englund — President of Relief Association Mike Peterson — Secretary Treasurer of Relief Association Absent from the meeting are as follows: John Bergeson —Lino Lakes Representative Welcome to New Members The meeting started with a request from Keinath to have everyone seated in the meeting introduce themselves. Year -end Review of Call History Chief Bennett reviewed the 1997 call history compared to 1994, 1995, and 1996. Calls were down in 1997 compared to 1996- Graphs were presented showing comparisons of call history for these years. Calls on CO Monitors were down from last year. Pension Increase Des Englund and Jerry Peterson of the Relief Association requested a pension increase for the firefighters. Chief Bennett gave a presentation with a study of comparisons of pensions within surrounding areas. Milo explained that the increase would not effect the planned budget and would come from revenue earned by investments. A financial statement showing a very conservative break down of future earnings answered many questions asked. Treasurer of the Relief Association, Jerry Peterson, advised members e, that the money now is in a Money Market, Bonds, Stocks, Mutual Funds and has done very well in the past years. Des Englund told members how the new bylaws with a change in vesting from 5 up to 10 years would benefit and help the surplus. The pension now stands at $2400 per year of service and the Relief Association is requesting an increase to $3000 per year of service. Andy Neil made the motion to approve the firefighters pension increase to $3000 per year of service on the condition that the cities would not increase their share more than the planned amount. LeAnn Osbun seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. Fire Chief Review Jim Keinath addressed Chief Bennett's annual review. The review was very positive and the steering committee feels Milo has done very well. The administration recommended a 3 % /Jne in pay, which will increase the Chief's yearly salary from $50,058 to CIA51,S60.__ Tom Wilharber motioned to approve the 3% increase. Dan Stoltz seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. Jim Keinath adjourned the meeting at 4:25 p.m. Janet Haapoja, Secretary Jim Keinath Circle Pines Administrator Centennial Fire District 7741 Lake Drive Lino Lakes, MN 55014 (651) 784 -7472 1999 Budget - The budget being proposed for 1999 is really the same as the 1998 budget with the following exceptions: 1. Part-time Secretary This account was increased to provide 30 hours of secretarial coverage. As we develop, there seems to be more work in this area. Increase from $9,000 to $17,000 2. District Chief Salary Provide funds for annual review and salary adjustment. Increase from $52,500 to $54,500 3. Payroll Taxes Increased because the salary accounts were increased. Increased from $15,000 to $16,000 This represents an increase of 2 percent over the 1998 budget. Attached you will find some charts that show the effect of this budget on the cost per citizen. Over the years, we have been able to slightly reduce the cost per citizen even though our budget is increasing. This is possible because there is growth in the district and the budget growth is less than the population. The cost per citizen varies by city because of differences in run volume and valuations as it relates to population. CENTENNIAL FIRE DISTRICT BUDGET 10/8/98 Account 1998 1999 Change % Change 5020 Logistic Supplies 1,000 1,000 0 0.00% 5030 Fire Calls 32,000 32,000 0 0.00% 5035 Rescue Calls 30,000 30,000 0 0.00% 5040 Training Calls 20,000 20,000 0 0.00% 5045 Maintenance Drills 9,000 9,000 0 0.00% 5050 Inspection Wages 12,000 12,000 0 0.00% 5060 Fire Prevention Wages 4,000 4,000 0 0.00% 5210 Vehicle Maintenance 20,000 20,000 0 0.00% 5211 Fuel and Lube 5,500 5,500 0 0.00% 5212 Other Maintenance 10,000 10,000 0 0.00% 5300 Uniforms 2,000 2,000 0 0.00% 5305 Equipment 30,000 30,000 0 0.00% 5310 Insurance 25,000 25,000 0 0.00% 5312 Medical Physicals 3,000 3,000 0 0.00% 5320 Accounting Services 3,200 3,200 0 0.00% 5325 Legals 2,000 2,000 0 0.00% 5350 Office Supplies and Printing 6,000 6,000 0 0.00% 5355 Community Service 5,000 5,000 0 0.00% 5360 Dues and Memberships 2,000 2,000 0 0.00% 5365 Subscriptions 1,000 1,000 0 0.00% 5370 Travel and Conferences /Schoo 14,000 14,000 0 0.00% 5375 Cleaning Supplies and Service 6,000 6,000 0 0.00% 5380 Telephone 7,000 7,000 0 0,00% 5385 Utilities 18,000 18,000 0 0.00% 5390 Medical Supplies 1,000 1,000 0 0.00% 5395 Breathing Air 3,000 3,000 0 0.00% 5400 Salaried Positions 15,500 15,500 0 0.00% 5425 Part Time Secretary 9 400 17,000 7,600 84.44% 5510 District Chief 52,500.1 54,500 2,000 3.96% 5511 Steering Committee Secretary -- 250 250 0 0.00% 5999 Payroll Taxes and Benefits 15,000 16,000 1,000 7.41% Total 364,350 374,950 10,600 2.99% Relief Association 20,000 20,500 500 2.56% Depreciation 9,570 9,570 0 0.00% Common Area Charges 26,245 25,341 (904) -3.33% Total 420,165 430,361 10,196 2.49% Capital Equipment 100,000 100,000 0 0.00% Total Budge 520,165 530,361 10,196 2.00% Centennial Budget 1999 Centennial Fire District Costs per Person 35.00 30.00 - - .... - = 25.00 - 0 L IL 20.00 - - L m 0-15.00- 0 0 10.00- - - -- -- 5.00 - - - -- - 0.00 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 Centerville Cost per Person 35.00 - — -- - -- -- __ -- 30.00 c 25.00 0 a 20.00 - L * 0' 15.00 - N 0 U 10.00 - 5.00 0.00 - 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 Circle Pines Cost per Person 35.00 30.00 25.00 0 N a 20.00 CL L 15.00 - N O U 10.00 - 5.00 0.00 - 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 Lino Lakes Cost per Person 35.00 30.00 - 25.00 - C O N L 0) 20.00 _ - - L Q. 15.00 U) O U 10.00 - - 5.00 - - -- 0.00 - r 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 Cost per Person 40.00 — �-- r 35.00 i P I t a� 30.00 N 25.00 la 20.00 Centerville ti � ® Circle Pines Q n ❑ Lino Lakes +� -- 0 15.00 1 0.00 � . 5.00 0.00 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 Year Funding Formula Centennial Fire District 10/13/98 1999 Bud et Centerville Circle Pines Lino Lakes Total 1993 Runs 66 139 307 512 1994 Runs 79 161 365 605 1995 Runs 82 186 454 722 1996 Runs 107 291 483 881 1997 Runs 100 247 477 824 Total 434 1024 2086 3544 Five Year Avera e 86.80 204.80 417.20 708.80 Market Value per Anoka Count 85,907,000 171,535,300 627,423,800 884,866,100 Market Value divided b 1,000,000 85.91 171.54 627.42 884.87 Po ulation er Met Council 2,305 4,772 14,560 21,637 Po ulation divided b 100 23.05 47.72 145.60 216.37 CALCULATION Five Year Avera a of Runs 86.80 204.80 417.20 708.80 Market Value divided b 1,000,000 85.91 171.54 627.42 884.87 Po ulation divided b 100 23.05 47.72 145.60 216.37 Total 195.757 424.0553 1190.2238 1810.0361 Percenta e of Total 10.8% 23.4% 65.8% 100.0% 1998 Bud et 57,861 125,340 351,799 535,000 Centennial Fire 1999 Budget Centerville 10.7% Circle Pines Lino Lakes 22.8% 66.5% t Centennial Fire District October 1998 Monthly Planner Sunday Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday 1 2 3 S�l�'tn6er Novanber SXl FS ssnrwTrs — - -- ---- -- —._�. -- — 1 1 - y .1 i s 3 „ r t S 9 10 11 12 8 4 a " 12 L Id 13 I< 15 i<+ 1+ IS 19 IS - 19 18 19 20 21 N 31 2, 23 24 21 24 >2 23 24 25 2b 2] 28 21 28 29 30 29 3e 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 9:15 AM Rice Lake 9a5 AM Rice Lake 9:15 AM Rice Lake 10:00 AM - 11:00 AM Elementary Elementary Elementary Station Tour -Boy Scouts 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 9:30 AM Lino Lakes 9:30 AM Lino Lakes 9:00 AM - 10:30 AM Elementary Elementary Station Tours - Presehool/Dayeares 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 9:30 AM Golden Lake 9:30 AM Golden Lake 9:30 AM Golden Lake Elementary Elementary Elementary 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 9:30 AM Centerville 9:30 AM Centerville 9:30 AM Centerville 9:30 AM Centerville Elementary Elementary Elementary Elementary Printed by Calendar Cre is on 10/9/98 EMERGENCY INFORMATION FOR HELP - CALL 911 Patient full name Last First Middle Date of Birth Address Apt # MEDICATIONS: City, State, Zip Phone Doctor Hospital Social Security Medicare No. Health Ins. Policy No. Medical History: Med. His. Cont: Med. His Cont: Notify in Case of Emergency x Date last updated: This form supplied by the Centennial Fire District EMERGENCY INFORMATION FOR HELP - CALL 911 Patient full name Last First Middle Date of Birth Address Apt # MEDICATIONS: City, State, Zip Phone Doctor Hospital Social Security Medicare No. Health Ins. Policy No. Medical History: Med. His. Cont: Med. His Cont: Notify in Case of Emergency Date last updated: This form supplied by the Centennial Fire District _ CITY OF CENTERVILLE CITY COUNCIL MEETING AUGUST 26, 1995 Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, the City Council of the City of Centerville held its regularly scheduled Council meeting and a Joint Workshop with the Planning and Zoning Commission to discuss the revised Shoreland Ordinance on Wednesday, August 26, 1998, at City Hall, 1880 Main Street. PRESENT: Mayor Tom Wilharber Council Members: Theresa Brenner Mary Jo Helmbrecht Sauna Buckbee ABSENT: Council Member: Laura Powers STAFF: Jim March, City Administrator Ry -Chel Gaustad, City Clerk Paul Palzer, Public Works Director/Building Official CALL TO ORDER Mayor Wilharber called the workshop to order at 5:05 p.m. PUBLIC HEARING Dave Nyberg opened the discussion on the Shoreland Ordinance and then noted he updated the Shoreland Ordinance to reflect the Councils wishes. The ordinance was adjusted to change the setback from the lake to 75' and he changed the allowable height on buildings. He also recommended sending a copy of the ordinance without any further restrictions, to Rice Creek Watershed District (RCWD) for its consideration. Mr. James Hoeft - City Attorney, expressed the City's primary interest is to allow property owners to rebuild an existing house, in the case of a natural disaster (tornado, fires, flood). Ms. Broussard- Vickers was not concerned about property owners rebuilding existing houses within the newly established set backs, but she was concerned about rebuilding sheds, garages and pools within the established set backs. Ms. Broussard- Vickers did not condone that in the event of a natural disaster, properties that are on septic "must" connect to the City sewer system. 1 .r City Attorney, Jim Hoeft, warned that ordinance language to grant or deny variances for nonconforming structures could present problems. However, general standard is to attempt to bring all properties into conformity. The Council discussed rezoning properties adjacent to the shoreland, thus, allowing an existing structure to be rebuilt in a specific zone. In addition, if a structure is demolished, to be remodeled, then the new structure would become non - conforming. Therefore, 51% of an existing structure must remain in tack, in order for a property not to lose its nonconforming use. Councilmember Brenner requested Staff retrieve input from two lake associations. Ms. Broussard- Vickers left the meeting at 5:45 p.m. Councilmember Brenner moved and it was seconded by Councilmember Buckbee to adjourn at 5 45 12.m. Motion carried. The Joint Workshop with the Planning and Zoning Commission adjourned at 5:45 p.m. *� * *��a *�r�+ * * *�� ** six*** xra+* ��*► aar* ar** x��+** � * * *a * * * *:r� * * * * * * *a� *� * *� *�s�■ Mayor Wilharber called the August 26, City Council Meeting to order at 6:05 p.m. PRESENT: Mayor Wilharber Council Members: Theresa Brenner Sanna Buckbee Mary Jo Helmbrecht ABSENT: Councilmember Laura Powers STAFF: Jim March, City Administrator Ry -Chel Gaustad, City Clerk Paul Palzer, Public Works Director/Building Official Dave Nyberg, H.R. Green Consulting Engineers CALL TO ORDER Mayor Wilharber called the meeting to order at 6:05 p.m. PUBLIC HEARINGS 21st Avenue Public Hearing 2 Dave Nyberg introduced the 21 st Ave. North Street and Storm Sewer Improvements. Mr. Nyberg noted the total project costs: Site work 5,000 Streets 120,000 Storm Sewer 30,000 $155,000 Also, Mr. Nyberg indicated there is $20,000 - $30,000 in construction cost for turning lanes, and the additional accounts for administration. The overall project cost is estimated at $230,000.00, which includes Lino Lakes expenses. The project schedule includes the following: Public Hearing Plan Approval and Order Advertisements for Bids Sept. 9 Bid Opening Oct. 8 Award Project Oct. 12 Begin Construction Oct. 26 Assessment Hearing Oct. 28 Complete Construction Nov. 1998 / Spring 1999 Mr. Jim Kozar of Automotive Drive Line (ADL - 7095 - 21 st Ave. S) questioned the approximate cost to construct the road. Mr. Nyberg noted few alternates: a per foot cost, and a blanket cost to each property owner, however, all costs are subject to the City's contributions. Mr. Bob Sorg ( Noble Welding 7075 21st Ave S ) inquired if the water being piped from Lino Lakes, across 21 st Avenue and draining onto his property would be permanent. Mr. Nyberg stated he is not proposing to discharge run -off onto the swale between ADL and Noble Welding. Mr. Kozar (ADL) questioned the Engineer if there will be a stop light at the intersection of Hightway 14 and 21 st. Ave. Mr. Nyberg stated that there may very well be a stop light, but not anytime soon. Mr. Kozar (ADL) questioned the Engineer, if 21 st. Ave. N. will align with 21 st. Ave. S. Mr. Nyberg stated that it is proposed to align the two streets. Mr. Sorg (Noble Welding) stated he was glad to see that minimal road construction work is being done. He also asked that we keep in mind that the road has been maintenance free for 10 years. Also, he questioned the Engineer if the city can use the existing road to assist with the cost. Mr. Nyberg stated that the present material will be milled and reused. Mr. Kozar (ADL) stressed the need to implement a traffic light. Mayor Wilharber noted the mayors from the three surrounding communities plan to discuss the bridge safety with Anoka County and possibly the state. Councilmember Helmbrecht commented she did not feel comfortable making a decision at this 3 time. Councilmember Buckbee stated if funds are available she would rather cash roll the project. Motion by Councilmember Helmbrecht to close the Public Hearing for 21st. Ave. _ Councilmember Brenner seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. Parkview Assessment Hearing Mr. Nyberg gave a presentation on proposed improvements for the Parkview Addition and the total project cost and the project schedule. Mr. Nyberg explained the proposed Parkview Addition assessments of $12,389.99 and the $1,741.23 assessments. Moreover, he explained the assessments does not include the SAC (Sewer available Charge) hook up cost, nor the cost from the street to the home, nor does the assessment include the Water Availability Charge (WAC). Mr. Don Jones (6994 Centerville Road) questioned the double assessment of $12,389.99 at 6994 Centerville road. Mr. Nyberg explained the 6994 Centerville Road property can be split into two properties. Therefore, there are two assessments on the one parcel. However, Mr. Nyberg indicated one assessment is for the $12,389.99 and that the City may defer the assessment 10 years. Mr. Jones commented that Ms. Stephanie Hasiak (6994 Centerville Road) purchased Mr. Tourville's property and was not informed that there was an assessment nor a pending assessment. Councilmember Helmbrecht suggested the assessment be deferred for 10 years and then the property owner will not have to pay the assessment until then or until the lot is split. Mr. Jones (6994 Centerville Road) stated the pro erty owner is required to pay all assessments on a property prior to selling. Furthermore, Mr. Tourville was not aware of a pending assessment to his property. In addition, how can the city expect one property owner to pay $25,000 for an assessment! Councilmember Buckbee understood that Mr. Tourville was aware of the assessment when he owned the property. Mr. Jones stated he knew about an assessment and escrowed $1,700, at closing. The Council confirmed Mr. Robert Barett's (6953 Centerville Road) question that he could pay the assessment total prior to the end of the year, without paying interest. Mr. Jones commented that a $25,000 assessment is too high for the property in question. Mr. James Hoeft - City Attorney, noted the highest and best use standard principle has been applied to assess the property according to improvement benefit. Motion by Councilmember Helmbrecht. seconded by Councilmember Brenner to close the public hearing at 6.55 p.m. Motion carried unanimously. 4 APPEARANCES Ms. Kristen Hanson (Ehlers & Associates) Present Bond Inform for Parkview Development Resolution 98 -17 Award Bond Bid for Parkview Development Ms. Kristen Hanson from Ehlers and Associates updated the Council from the last meeting, the issue concerning awarding the bids needed to be resolved regarding the storm sewer. At that time, the Council decided to reject all bids and negotiate with the best bidder. Moreover, Ehlers and Associates negotiated and arrived at 4.5873% effectiveness, which is better than the 4.76% previously presented. Councilmember Brenner questioned Ms. Hanson if there was a financial penalty to delay the bids. Ms. Hanson replied that the cost to delay awarding the bid costs an additional $700. Mr. Nyberg explained the situation surrounding the Parkview Development grading conflict as it pertains to the storm sewer and outlet. Furthermore, upon recognizing the grading elevation conflict, with the original elevation 9063 and proposed elevation 905, H. R. Green brought the issue to the Public Works Directors/Building Officials attention. Not until later did the issue arise and unfortunately Mr. Nyberg missed the council meeting when the issue was addressed. Mr. Palzer stated the plans show what was discussed with H. R. Green and it appears in line. Mr, Nyberg stated RCWD did not have a problem with the elevation. Mr. Nyberg also apologized for missing the last meeting, but explained that Public Works Directors /Building Officials were notified of the elevation situation a few weeks prior to the issue arising. In addition, Mr. Nyberg understood the situation was under control. Councilmember Helmbrecht questioned the Engineer if the development ditch will be open, The ditch may be open (west and east) between Center Oaks and Parkview development. Motion by Councilmember Helmbrecht to approve the revised grading plan dated 8/24/98 Councilmember Brenner seconded the motion Motion carried unanimously, Motion by Councilmember Helmbrecht to approve Resolution 98 -17 regarding Bonds for Parkview Addition. Councilmember Brenner seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. CONSIDERATION OF MINUTES August 19. 1998 Workshop Meeting Minutes Motion by Councilmember Helmbrecht to approve August 19 1998 Worksh Meeting_ Minutes. Councilmember Brenner seconded the motion Helmbrecht aye, Brenner aye, Wilharber aye. Buckbee - abstained. PAYMENT OF CLAIMS 5 The City of Centerville August 13 -26 Mayor Wilharber questioned E.H. Renner and Son's payment of $4,800. Mr. Palzer stated that lightning struck well 41 and E.H. Renner replaced the damaged parts. Motion by Councilmember Brenner to approve the August 13 -26 payment of claims Motion seconded by Councilmember Powers. Motion carried unanimously, Pay Estimate #3 for 20th Avenue Improvements Motion by Councilmember Helmbreeth to approve Pay estimate #3 for 20th Avenue improvement. Councilmember Brenner seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. Centennial Fire District Councilmember Buckbee approved the Centennial Fire District claims Councilmember Brenner seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. SET AGENDA Police Contract Shoreland Ordinance Economic Development Committee Police Report Motion by Councilmember Helmbrecht t a rove he Set A nda. Co ncilmemb r Brenner seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. PETITIONS AND COMPLAINTS UNFINISHED BUSINESS Resolution 98 -18 Adopting Parkview Addition Assessment Roll Motion by Councilmember Helmbrecht to adopt Resolution 98 -18 Adopting Parkview Addition Assessment Roll Motion seconded by Councilmember Powers Motion carried unanimously. Motion by Councilmember Helmbrecht to defer the assessment of $12.389. for ten years on PIN 23- 31 -22 -31 -0040 Councilmember Brenner seconded the motion Motion carried unanimous The Woods of Clearwater Creek Mr. Nyberg gave an overview of the proposed development and noted the Developer is not in need for approval. However, there are two points of interest in the Developer's Contract. First is the cost for looping the watermain from Revoir Street to Brian Drive. Second is a temporary cul -de -sac and the cost to create a permanent road in the future. Mr. Nyberg 6 proposed that the City pick up the cost to loop the watermain along the north boundary of The Woods Development. Mr. March distributed a letter dated August 25, from the City Attorney - Jim Hoeft. The letter suggests to change the development agreement that states the city requires insurance coverage of $300,000 per occurrence to a maximum of $600,000 to a maximum of $700,000 as per statutory regulation. Mr. Dick Travis commented that he had no concern with changing the Developers Agreement to reflect the City Attorney's suggestions. Mr. Nyberg addressed a pedestrian ramp at the intersection of 73rd and Brain Drive. Attorney James Hoeft noted the pedestrian ramp at the end of the trail may be a future liability concern and recommended that no pedestrian ramp be installed. Mr. Palzer agreeded when Councilmember Powers stated that she preferred not to put in a pedestrian ramp. Laurie LaMotte Memorial Park Bid Result Mr. Nyberg briefed the Council on the Laurie LaMotte Park bid results. Forest Lake contract bid at $153,227.90. Mr. Nyberg felt the City should discuss mass grading on the site. Mr. Nyberg suggested awarding the bid during the September 9 Council meeting. However, he suggested delaying the seeding until the spring of 1999. Mr. March spoke with the Park and Recreation Committee Chairman - Michael Navin. Mr. Navin noted concern about turf establishment, and suggested the work commence immediately. Also, the Chain of Lakes Little League commited to helping with the project. Mr. March confirmed, Councilmember Buckbee questioned that an estimate for everything in the park is approximately $330,000. Councilmember Helmbrecht would like Park and Recreation's input, prior to making a decision on all the alternate options. Motion by Councilmember Buckbee to award the base bid of $153.227.90 to Forest Lake Contracting for completion of the Laurie LaMotte Park, contingent upon Park and Recreation's approval of alternate options. Council further discussed the advantages and disadvantages pertaining to the alternative bid options in developing Laurie LaMotte Park. Mr. March informed the Council that Publicworks may be able to do some of the work, thus lowering the project cost. Councilmember Powers mentioned that the Boy Scouts may be able to help. The Council was all in favor of the m otio n. 7 Mr. Willie Lessard (Center Villa) Rezone Consideration - Mr. Davich (Rud Land Surveying) was present to discuss a rezone request from R3 (Residential Future Expansion Non - sewered) to B 1 (Commercial). Mr. Davich shared the proposed development currently shows a few ponds to buffer current residential development. Mr. Dana Johnson (7048 Cottonwood Court) requested that a trailway access Cottonwood Court to other parks. Thus, the homeowner will not have to walk on Main Street to get to a park. Ms. Amy Mample (7034 Brian Court) questioned the Developer that if the property is not sold then why rezone the property? Mr. Davich noted a town home developer voiced interest in the property. Ms. Chris Swenson (7016 Brian Court) questioned the Developer, whether or not the businesses will be located closer to the north existing buildings, if the cul -de -sac road is moved to the north? Mr. Davich stated the road may be moved closer to the north property line but, either way the town homes will be near the property line. Mr. March mentioned a developer is looking to build rental units on the property. Councilmember Buckbee stated that rental units are good for a higher tax base. Councilmember Helmbrecht questioned why we need to have a trail accessing the east side of 20th Avenue. Councilmember Brenner commented that because of talks with citizens and the Design Team, several persons have voiced a desire to have more trails throughout Centerville. Mr, Tom Pelican (1889 Center Street) questioned why the Developer wants to rezone the property if there are buyers willing to build town homes on the property? Mr. Dave Nyberg stated the developer was looking for consideration prior to proceeding with the project. In addition, with the present time frame, no construction will take place until 1999. Mr. Swenson would rather see some type of residential development instead of townhomes. Councilmember Powers stated she had received several calls in regards to this development. She would rather have six businesses than town homes. She feels this is a good compromise. Councilmember Helmbrecht understood Mr. Lessard will have covenants indicating what what type of business would be acceptable to locate in the commercal district. Mayor Wilharber stated the Comprehensive Plan showed Brian Drive connecting to 20th Avenue and if a residential district is approved then 20th Avenue should extend to 20th Avenue, Councilmember Helmbrecht favored the proposed development with businesses opened from 8:00 - 5:00 p.m. Also, the city knows what is going in the commercial district and the area will be 8 more open space than if it is residential or town homes. Motion by Councilmember Powers to take the rezone from the table to take action on the rezone Motion seconded by Councilmember Brenner. Motion carried unanimousl. Motion by Councilmember Helmbrecht to approve the rezone request from R3 to B 1 to the westerly boundary for outlot A and B and remaining portion rezoned R3 to R2 as per plan dated June 22, 1998, contingent upon final plat approval. Motion seconded by Councilmember Brenner Helmbrecht, Brenner and Powers - aye. Buckbee and Wilharber - nay. Motion denied due to lack of 4 /5th vote. Police Contract Mayor Wilharber stated the Police Chief Search has been an interesting process and that the Department received several good candidates. A joint meeting was held on August 24, 1998, with Circle Pines and Lexington for a proposed budget meeting. Mayor Wilharber, Councilmember Brenner and Councilmember Helmbrecht were present. The meeting started at 7:00 and ended at 1 1:00 p.m. Mayor Wilharber thanked the participating members. The Circle Pines/Lexington Police Department is looking at Centerville experiencing an $307,515 increase for 24 hour police coverage in Centerville. Lock -outs and false calls will be explored and evaluated as the City goes through the grid theory. Mayor Wilharber clarified that 24 hour coverage does not mean 24 hour continuous coverage. He gave the go ahead with $274,568 for the 1999 Tri -City. Councilmember Helmbrecht agreed with the following percents: 49% Circle Pines 26% Lexington 25% Centerville Mayor Wilharber mentioned Centerville is growing fast and experiencing more residential and commercial growth, thus increasing the City's safety needs. Councilmember Helmbrecht requested the Police Department document their actual time in Centerville. Mayor Wilharber touched upon tenative amounts to partner with the CPLPD. Motion by Councilmember Buckbee to approve $274.568. for the Tri -City Police Department. Motion seconded by Councilmember Helmbrecht. Further discussion. Councilmember Helmbrecht noted this included two new staff members. 9 Motion carried unanimously. Councilmember Powers stated for the record "I have total faith in our police department. They have been nothing but incredibly wonderful, respectful, courteous, kind and efficient. I think they are a talented group of men and women. I have a very large problem with the City of Centerville paying 25% of the budget for 1999, while the City of Lexington only pays 26% of the budget for 1999. I also think that it is unfair to the City of Circle Pines who is carrying a big bunch of the burden." Shoreland Ordinance Motion by Councilmember Helmbrecht to make changes and forward to RCWD with copies furnished to the lakes association Also to change the title of Building Inspector to Building Official Councilmember Buckbee seconded the motion Motion carried unanimously. NEW BUSINESS Consulting Engineer Selection After an extensive discussion the City Council took the following action: Motion by Councilmember Helmbrecht to chafe the official City Engineer from R.R. Green to Bonestroo Councilmember Brenner seconded the motion Mr. Nyberg questioned the Council why the change in Engineers? Councilmember Powers explained that a year ago she had requested a review of all of our consulting firms, which included H.R. Green. It can't be monitored if it is not reviewed. It had nothing to do with Mr. Nyberg, personally. Councilmember Brenner stated it was a very drawn - out process consisting of many meetings, and it was very time consuming and covered many areas. Mr. Nyberg requested the Council member workshop notes and how the Council point system supported the change in engineering firms. Councilmember Helmbrecht asked Attorney James Hoeft if there were any legal issues. Does the City have to produce the notes from the workshop session regarding the engineering firm search? Mr. Hoeft stated, "Yes the workshop notes legally have to be made available." Mayor Wilharber called for the vote Helmbrecht aye Brenner aye Powers aye Buckbee nay. and Wilharber - nay, Motion carried Councilmember Helmbrecht amended the motion to "Include all documents the City paid for be passed along to the City. Councilmember Powers seconded the amendment. 10 Mr. March mentioned the firms will need to negotiate a reasonable time to exchange the information. Mr. Wilharber mentioned that H.R. Green has been very professional and organized, - and did not feel it was necessary to place the additional comment in a motion. Motion carried unanimously Motion by Councilmember Helmbrecht to retain HA Green for the 20th Avenue and Parkview Development contingent upon the smooth transition and Clyde is to remain as the inspector. Councilmember Buckbee left at 9:25 p.m. Mayor Wilharber abstained. Motion carried Councilmember Brenner read aloud a portion of the July 21, 1998 EDC minutes. "Motion by Tim Rehbein to ask City Council to continue receiving the profits from the newsletter ads for fund raising to be used on city promotions such as, monuments, street banners, etc. Seconded by John Magill. All in favor." Ms. Gaustad noted the $25 initial cost does not cover the business card set up fee and she suggested the initial fee is retained in the general fund. Councilmember Brenner moved to approve the newsletter profits to be applied to the EDC fund to be used on city promotions less the set up fee Councilmember Powers seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimoudy ADMINISTRATORS REPORT Mr. March reported the City received a letter from Greg Hellings requesting the Council to consider the transition date of January 1, 1999. Councilmember Helmbrecht moved to acknowledge the letter from the previous City Attorney, but the original motion stands. Councilmember Brenner seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. CONSENT AGENDA Councilmember Brenner moved to approve the consent agenda. Mayor Wilharber seconded the motion. Helmbrecht - nay, Powers - abstained. Motion did not carry. 1. Resolution #98 -19 Electing to Continue Participating in the Local Housing Incentives Account Program Under the Metropolitan Livable Communities Act Councilmember Brenner moved to approve consent agenda item #1 Councilmember 11 2 Resolution 98 -01 Amend 1998 Appointments - Legal Newspaper - Press Publications - City Attorney - Barna, Guzy & Steffen, Ltd. Councilmember Helmbrecht moved to approve the item #2 of the consent agenda. Councilmember Brenner seconded the motion Helmbrecht Brenner Wilharber - aye, Powers - nay. Motion carried. 3 Annual Step Increase - Grade 5, Step 3 - City Clerk Based on Satisfactory Annual Performance Review Councilmember Brenner moved to approve item #3 of the consent agenda Mayor Wilharber seconded the motion Brenner Wilharber, Helmbrecht - aye Powers abstained Motion carried. 4. Bonine Excavating - Accept bid of $5,500 for demolition of Barett House Councilmember Brenner moved to approve item #4 on the consent agenda Mayor Wilharber seconded the motion. Brenner. Wilharber. Helmbrecht - aye Powers - nay, Motion carried. ADJOURNMENT Councilmember Helmbrecht moved to adiour the August 26 1998 Council meeting Councilmember Brenner seconded the motion Motion carried unanimously. The August 26, 1998 Council meeting adjourned at 9;35 p.m. Respectfully Submitted, Ry -Chel Gaustad, CMC City Clerk 12 o Howard R, Green Company CONSULTING ENGINEERS Formerly MSA Consulting Engineers October 22, 1998 File: 260085m -0071 Mr. Jim March City Administrator City of Centerville 1880 Main Street Centerville, MN 55038 RE: PARTIAL PAYMENT ESTIMATE NO. 5 20th AVENUE SEWER AND WATERMAIN PROJECT Dear Mr. March: Enclosed please find Partial Payment Estimate No. 5 for the above - referenced project. This pay estimate is for work completed up to Wednesday, October 21, 1998. The work included in this payment is primarily miscellaneous sitework, watermain and sanitary sewer work. The total amount earned this period is $45,977.20 with 5% retained, for a total payment of $43,678.34. We recommend that the City of Centerville approve this payment and make payment promptly to the Contractor's escrow agency, Northern Escrow, Incorporated. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call. Sincerely, Howard R. Green Company c_�' David E. Nyberg, P.r Project Manager DENlst Enclosure cc: Ms. Nancy Bonine, Bonine Excavating, Inc. Ms. Heather Schauf, Northern Escrow, Inc. Ms. Jean Campbell, CMP, Inc. Mr. Jason Lindberg, Tunnels, Inc. \1SPNW FSWOLI IDATAIPROJQ60085m5pay5.doc 1326 Energy Park Drive • St. Paul, MN 55108 • 6121644 -4389 fax 612/644 -9446 toll free 888/368 -4389 PARTIAL PAYMENT ESTIMATE NO. 5 MOM: SEPTEMBER 17, ME TO: OCTOBER 21, ME CONTRACTOR: BONINE EXCAVATING. INC. ADDRESS; 12669 MEADOW VALE ROAD, ELK RIVER, MN 55330 OWNER: CITY OF CENTERVILU, MINNESOTA PROJECT. 26)(385M COMPLETION DATE AMOUNT OF CONTItACT! S5438.7%,65 ORIGINAL: AUGUST 30. ?"S ORIGINAL: REVISED: REVISED; EEM922 PRILC scutEnuLE I qsrrEwnRK I CLEARING AND GRUBBING TREE 20 $50.00 10 $5W.D) IN) sa."'m 2 CLEARING AND GRUBBING ACRE 1 5400.00 0 moo 0 $0.w 3 REMOVE WOVEN WIRE FENCE LF 4200 50.40 0 woo 2m $w.w 4 SALVAGE AND INSTALL SIGN EA 6 $60.00 0 Sow 3 slw.w 5 SALVAGE GATE EA 1 $75.00 a W.W 0 SX)m 6 TOPSOIL BORROW CY 2500 $1.00 0 mm 0 $O.w 7 SEEDING AC 4 $450.00 7 S3.150M 7 $3,1"m 8 MULCHING AC 4 $105.00 7 5735m 7 $735.00 9 SODDING SY 1500 $1.50 5m S750.00 saD $750.00 10 SILT FENCE LF 500 $1.25 1" 51.250.00 14w $1,750M T SCHEDULE 1.0 SrFEWORK-TOTAL 56,385m $15.365.00 SCHEDULE 1 0 STREET CONSTRI REMO I REMOVE CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER LF 50 52.00 0 SOIN 0 w DO 2 SALVAGE AGGREGATE(CV) CY 65 $3,00 0 W03 5 51)'m 3 MILL EXISTING BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT SY 35 51.00 0 Sow 0 SOW 4 SUBGRADE PREPARATION SY 300 $0.50 0 Sow 0 RIM 5 GEOTEXT[LE FABRIC SY 300 $1.00 D Sow 0 S4).w 6 4" PERFORATED THERMOPLASTIC DRAIN PIPE LF 200 $5.00 a S0.w 0 SIYm 7 SELECT GRANULAR BORROW (CV) CY 350 $7.50 0 mm 0 sow 9 AGGREGATE SHOULDERING, CLASS 2 TON 310 $15.75 0 SON 0 fo'm 9 AGGREGATE BASE, CLASS 5 TON 135 511.25 0 w'w 0 $000 10 BITUMINOUS WEAR COURSE, TYPE 4] A TON 40 570.00 0 SIM a W.W 11 SURMOUNTABLE CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTE LF 50 $15.00 0 sow 0 Sow 12 S I ANDARD PROC rOR EA I 5I00,00 0 Sam 0 $().w 13 IN.PLACE DENSITY EA to S55.00 0 Sum D sx),D) T SCHEDULE 2.0 STREET CONSTRUCTION-TOTAL ww $D.W PAGE I rrsnt SCREDITI E. 3-0 SMRM DRAINAGE I REMOVE 15" CMP CULVERT LF loo $5.00 0 am m wsom 2 SALVAGE AND INSTALL 35' RCP LF 50 $15.00 0 "m 50 s7m.w 3 SALVAGE AND INSTALL 24" RCP LF 70 $15.00 0 so.w 0 w.w 3 15" CMP APRON EA 4 $100.00 2 $200.8 7 vw.w 4 15" CM? CULVERT LF loo S16.00 70 51.120.w 170 $2,n0.w 4 18' CMP APRON EA 2 $125.00 1 5125.8 3 $375.W 5 18' CMP CULVERT LF 50 S17,00 20 &u w 4 5340.8 6 15' RCP LF 20 SI&DO 0 " w 0 w.w T SCHEDULE 3.0 STORM DRAINAGE-TOTAL $1,795,8 55,135.8 SCHEDULE 4.0 WATERMAIN I CONNECT TO EXISTING WATERMAIN EA I 5320.00 0 00.8 1 $320.8 2 6" PVC WATERMAIN LF 140 516.00 43 W&M 443 $7.M.W 3 8' PVC WATERMAIN LF 920 $16.50 64 $1.056.8 llw 51912w.w 4 12* PVC WATERMAIN LF 3320 $16.90 175 52.957.50 3275 $55.347,50 5 JACK BORE 8' PVC WATERMAIN LF 320 $%.00 0 woo 170 516,3208 6 JACK BORE 12* PVC WATERMAIN LF 90 $105.00 w $7.350.8 m 526.250.8 7 INSTALL 12" WM THROUGH EXISTING CASING EA 2 51,550.00 0 Z.W 0 w.w 8 HYDRANT W/ VALVE EA 7 5080.00 0 w.w 8 $15,W.w 9 9' VALVE EA 20 $513.00 0 w.w 22 $11,3W.W 10 12' VALVE EA a $885.00 0 w.w 6 55.31om 1 1 FITTINGS LISS 12500 50.85 13W $1.173,00 :53M $13.073.8 12 2" INSULATION SF 64 $1.30 0 woo 0 som 13 GRANULAR FOUNDATION CY 2000 $17.00 0 so.w 0 w.w 14 GRANULAR BEDDING CY 2000 58.00 0 w.w 0 w.w 15 LOCATE GAS MAIN EA 5 $160.00 0 Mw 5 58w.w 16 STANDARD PROCTOR EA I $100.00 0 woo 2 S2M.W t7 IN-PLACE DENSITY EA 40 $50.00 0 W,W 6 $38.8 T SCHEDULE 4.0 WATERMAIN-TOTAL $u.224,50 $170.584.50 SCREDULF 5.0 SANITARY SEWER I CORE CONNECT TO EXISTING MH EA 1 $320,00 0 $0.00 1 $320.8 2 8' PVC SANITARY SEWER (10' -12' DEEP) LF 300 $1400 31 54348 881 512.334,8 3 S" PVC SANITARY SEWER (12' -l4' DEEP) LF 600 $15.50 43 $666.50 943 $14.616.5D 4 8" PVC SANITARY SEWER (14'-16' DEEP) LF 1200 $18.50 56 51.036.8 1656 530,636.8 5 9 PVC SANITARY SEWER DEEP) LF lom $23.00 3 569.00 93 $2.139.8 6 SANITARY MANHOLE (0-8 DEEP) EA 10 $1,130.00 a w.w 15 $16.900.8 7 EXTERNAL MANHOLE SEAL EA 11 $200,00 0 wm 5 $1mo'w 8 MANHOLE EXTRA DEPTH (> 8' DEEP) LF 100 576.00 4 S�w ag 56,764.8 9 8' PVC FORCEMAIN LF 2400 56.40 35 5224. 235 51 6.2248 10 LIFT STATION LS 1 $52,800.00 03 slmQm 0.8 W.2Q.W 11 8' X 6" WYE EA 18 $52.00 0 00.00 w $I.w.w 12 6" SANITARY SEWER SERVICE LF 620 $10.20 11 $21420 471 54.W,20 13 SANITARY SERVICE CLEANOUT EA 10 $140.00 0 so.w 2 $2w.w 14 JACK BORE 6' PVC SANITARY SEWER SERVICE LF 400 590.00 0 Saw 120 SID.M.W 15 JACK BORE 8" PVC SANITARY SEWER LF ion $90.00 0 W.W 330 529,7ao.w 16 JACK BORE 8' PVC FORCEMAIN LF 100 s90.00 w S5.4W w N $5,48.w 17 FITTINGS LBS 1000 $1.00 395 $395,00 1495 Hl 2" INSULATION SF 64 $1.30 0 woo 0 $o.w 19 GRANULAR FOUNDATION CY 2000 $17.00 0 Z.W 4aD $6.WLM 20 GRANULAR BEDDING CY 2000 58.00 0 som s8 $4.W.W 21 LOCATE FORCEMAIN EA 5 $215.00 0 som 5 $1,075.8 22 STANDARD PROCTOR EA I 5100.00 0 so.w I sim.w 23 IN-PLACE DENSITY EA 50 $50.00 0 W.00 3 sisom T SCHEDULE 5.0 SANITARY SEWER-TOTAL $24.582.70 $20,867-M ALTERNATE R - SCADATELEMETRY IMPROVEME I SCADAITELEMETRY IMPROVEMENTS LS 1 $86,456.00 0 wm a mm T ALTERNATE B SCADAITELEMETRY IMPROVEME3VIS-TOTAL 00.8 fO.W PAGE 2 .. .. . ...... IzEaa LW DESCRIPTION THIS ]PERIOD TO DATE SCHEDULE 1.0 SITEWORK--TOTAL 56.385.00 $151365.00 SCHEDULE 2.0 STREET CONSTRUCTION- -TOTAL so,w w.w SCHEDULE 3.0 STORM DRAINAGE.-TOTAL ST.7m PC 551m.m SCHEDULE 4.0 WATERMAINTOTAL $13.22490 $170,5U.50 SCHEDULE 5.0 SANITARY SEWER--TOTAL $24.5U." 520.867,70 ALTERNATE B SCADAITELEMETRY IMPROVEMENTS--TOTAL 50.00 som TOTAL 545,9T1.20 5399951.20 'T ... . .. . ....... .. . AMOUNT EARNED 545,917.20 $399.952.20 ......... Non',: ....... AMOUNT RETAINED $2.298.N $19.99/,61 4n .... . . .. . .. . . . . MATERIAL ON SME VIM %,W X l� . .. .... MATERIAL DIED= 50.00 ".w . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . PREVIOUS PAYMENTS ....... .... $242. , AMOUNT DUE 543,618.24 5137,133.N PAGE 3 UC I GG ' IJ8 1.7: ob I hereby ocrdly tbat all items and amounts shown by this pay mtimatc are correct for the work completed to date. CONTRACTOR- BONINt EXCAVATING, INC. BY: TULE: DATE: T Based on the ENGINEER'S on -site Inspections as an experienced and qualified design professional and on review of application for payment and the accompanying data and schedules, the ZNGINkER has determined, to the best of his lasowledge and belief, that the qusntides shown by this estimate are correct and that, based on such inspections and review, that the work has progressed to the point indicated (subject to tut evaluation of suoh work as a functiotthtg Project upon Substantial Completion, to the results of any subsequent tests required by the Contract Documents, and to any qualifications stated in his recommettdadon), and that payment of the amount recommended is due Contractoroo: but by recommending any payment, the ENGINEER will not thereby be deemed to have reviewed the mews, methods, sequences, techniques, or proceedures of construction or safety precautions or programs incident thereto or that the ENGINEER has made au; examination to ascertain how or for what purpose any Contractor has used the monies paid on account of the Contract 'ce, or that title to any of the work, materials, or equipment has passed to the Owner free and clear of any lain, claims, secuity interests or cncum6rancces, or that the Contractor(s) have completed their work exactly in accordance with the Contact Documents. ENGINEER HOWARD GREEN COMPANY BY: G V TITLE: DA'I'S: Approved by Owner /Commission CITr OF CENZERVff —LE, MINNESOTA BY: TITLE: DATE: End 60i90•d TT:£T 8665^22 -.1�D ills Howard R. Green Company atiltircet�tt�ts CONSULTING ENGINEERS Formerly MSA Consulting Engineers October 22, 1998 File: 260089m -0071 Mr. Jim March City Administrator City of Centerville 1880 Main Street Centerville, MN 55038 RE: PARTIAL PAYMENT ESTIMATE NO. 2 PARKVIEW ADDITION DEVELOPMENT Dear Mr. March: Enclosed please find Partial Payment Estimate No. 2 for the above - referenced project. This pay estimate is for work completed up to Wednesday, October 22, 1998. The work included in this payment is street construction, storm sewer, and trunk watermain. The street construction includes subgrade preparation, granular borrow, class 5, and curb and gutter throughout the development. The storm sewer includes all storm sewer along the streets along with the storm sewer outlet to the pond. The trunk watermain construction includes primarily 12 -inch watermain along Centerville Road. The total amount earned this period is $226,783.30 with 5% retained, for a total payment of $215,444.14. We recommend that the City of Centerville approve this payment and make payment promptly to the Contractor's escrow agency, Northern Escrow, Incorporated. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call. Sincerely, Howard R. Green I Company David E. Nyberg, P.E. Project Manager DEN /st Enclosure cc: Ms. Nancy Bonine, Bonine Excavating Ms. Heather Schauf, Northern Escrow, Inc. Mr. Richard Carlson, Richard Carlson and Associates Mr. Mike Quigley, Gor -Em Development, Inc. O: TROJ5260089m1pay2. doc 1326 Energy Park Drive • St. Paul, MN 55108 • 612/644 -4389 fax 612/644 -9446 toll free 888/368 -4389 PARTIAL PAN LENT ESTUTATE NO. 2 FROM: SEPTEMBER 17, 1998 TO: OCTOBER 21, 1998 CONTRACTOR: BONINE EXCAVATING, INC. ADDRESS: 12669 MEADOW VALE ROAD, ELK RIVER, MINNESOTA, MN 53330 OWNER: CITY OF CENTERVILLE, MINNESOTA PROJECT: PARKVIEW ADDITION STREET, STORM SEWER, SANITARY SEWER AND WATERMAIN IMPROVEMENTS (260089M) COMPLETION DATE AMOUNT OF CONTRACT: ORIGINAL: OCTOBER 17. 1998 ORIGINAL: 5444,279.00 REVISED: REVISED: ; CgaS'Ck [1TkNS ,3,3ISSRR'R1O<K `i AEY£i13.7O Ah'E 3TEbS 1:TO 411P5LTi$YfiOK.� FiN$R `. QI'Y., GIBFY Q2V< ffiFTtiE3X?r .0 ,AAT(i�RS'1`. SCDEDID 1..10 SITRWORK 1 SALVAGE TOPSOIL (CV) CY 400 $3.50 0.00 5090 0.00 $0,00 2 TOPSOIL BORROW (CV) CY 400 56.00 0.00 50.00 0.00 50.00 3 SEEDING AC 0.5 5450.00 0.00 50.00 0.00 50.00 4 MULCHING AC 0.5 $105.00 0.00 $0.00 0.00 50.00 5 SODDING $Y 35M $2.00 0.00 $0.00 0.00 $0.00 6 SILT FENCE LT 2000 $2.00 0.00 50.00 0.00 $0.00 7 FOUNDATION REMOVAL LS I 5650.00 0.50 $325.00 0,50 $325.00 T SCHEDULEI.O SITFWORK- TOTAL $325.00 5325.00 SCHEDULE 2 B STREET CONSTRUCTION 1 REMOVE BITUMINOUS DRIVEWAY SY 150 $2.50 0.00 50.00 0.00 SOAO 2 SALVAGE DRIVEWAY AGGREGATE CY 7 $5.00 0.00 $0.00 0.00 SO.00 3 SUBGRADE PREPARATION RD STA 22 $150.00 22.00 $3.300.00 22.00 $3.300.00 4 MODIFIED SELECT GRANULAR BORROW (P) CY 6000 $8.50 6,000.00 551000.00 6,OOD.00 $51,000.00 5 GEOTEXTILE FABRIC SY 10300 $1.00 9,000.00 $9,000.00 9 $9.000.00 6 MILL BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT SY 30 512.00 0.00 50.00 0.00 50.00 7 SHOULDERING AGGREGATE. CLASS 2 TON 10 S2D.00 0.00 50.00 0 m 50.00 8 AGGREGATE BASE, CLASS S TON 3175 58.50 2.000 cc 517,000.00 2,000.00 $17,000.00 9 TYPE 4IA WEAR COURSE MIXTURE TON 775 $31,00 0.00 50.00 0.00 50.00 10 TYPE 3111, BASE COURSE MIXTURE TON 775 $30.00 0,00 50.00 0.00 $0.00 I I BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR TACK COAT GAL 400 $1.10 0.00 $0.00 ODD 50.00 12 CONCRETE CURB& GUTTER, SURMOUNTABLE LF 4385 $6.50 4,386.00 $28,509.00 4,386.00 $28309.00 13 BITUMINOUS DRIVEWAY RESTORATION SY 115 510.00 0.00 $0.00 0.00 SOHO 14 4' CONCRETE SIDEWALK SF 5300 $2.00 0.00 $0.00 0.00 $0.00 IS SUBGRADE DENSITY TEST, INPLACE EA 20 $40.00 0.00 30.00 0.00 $0.00 16 CLASS 5 GRADATION TEST EA 2 565.00 0.00 50.00 0.00 $0.00 17 CLASS S PROCTOR TEST EA 2 $85.00 0.00 50.00 0.00 $0,00 TS CLASS 5 DENSITY TEST, INPLACE EA 10 $40.00 0.00 $0.00 0.00 $0.00 19 CONCRETE TESTING EA 7 $135.00 0.00 50.00 0.00 $0.00 20 BITUMINOUS CORE DENSITY TESTING EA 6 $350.00 0.00 5090 0.00 50.00 T SCHEDULE 2.0 STREET CONSTRUCTION -TOTAL $108,809.00 $108.809.00 o:lprojU60089 #2 PAGE I . . . . . ....... grDIEDULF. 10 BITUMINOUS TIZAIT, CONSTRUCTI I SUBGRADE PREPARATION RD STA 4 $180.00 0.00 SOM 0.00 $0.00 2 AGGREGATE BASE, CLASS 5 TON 175 $9.50 0.00 50.00 om $0.00 3 TYPE 41 BIT MIXTURE FOR PATHS TON 43 $35.00 0.00 50.00 0.00 MOD T SCHEDULE 3.0 BITUMINOUS TRAIL CONSTRUCTION - TOTAL sow 50.00 SCHEMIq E 4 0 STORM SEWER CONSTRITLI70 I REMOVE 12* CM? LF 40 55.50 0.00 $0.00 0.00 $0.00 2 15' CMP LF 85 $15.60 46.00 $717.60 46.00 $717.60 3 15' RCP, CL V LF 250 $20.15 192.00 $3,868.80 IK.m $3,868.80 4 IS' RCP. CL III LF 35 $22.00 197.00 84,334.00 Iw.00 54,334.00 5 21" RCP, CL III LF 365 $24.30 354.00 $8,673.00 354.00 $8.673.00 6 24' RCP, CL Ul LF 240 $26.60 206.00 $5.419.60 206.00 S5,479.60 7 30' RCP, CL III LF 350 $37.40 0.00 Somoo om $0.00 8 24 X 36 CATCH BASIN EA 7 $850.00 &W 56.800.00 8mm 56.800m00 9 STANDARD STORM MANHOLE EA 3 51.130M 3.00 53,3%.W 3.00 $3,390.00 10 34" DIAMETER STORM MANHOLE EA 2 $1,665.00 2.OD $3,330.00 2.00 $3.330.00 11 24m RCP APRON W1 TRASH GUARD EA 1 $675,00 2.00 susom 2.00 $1,350.00 12 30" RCP APRON W/ TRASH GUAM EA 3 $995.00 0.00 $0.00 Boo $0.00 13 15' RCP SAFETY APRON FA 2 $615.00 2m00 $1,230.00 2.00 $1,230.00 14 RIP RAP, CL III TON 6 $50.00 0.00 som 0.00 $0.00 15 20; 1 STORM SEWER SUBGRADE TAPER LF 200 $6.00 0.00 50.00 0.00 $0.00 16 CONCRETE CATCH BASIN COLLAR EA 7 $70.00 0.00 SOM 0,00 $0.00 17 CONCRETE MANHOLE COLLAR EA 5 $70.00 om 50.00 0.00 50.00 18 STANDARD PROCTOR EA 3 $95.00 omm Sow OM $0.00 19 INmPLACF. DENSITY RA 15 $40,00 0.00 Somw omoo $0.00 T SCHEDULE 4.0 STORM SEWER CONSTRUCTION TOTAL 539.173.00 $39,173m00 SCHEDITLE 9.0 WATERMAIN CONSTRUCTIDN I CONNECT TO EXISTING WATERMAIN EA 1 $320m 1.00 $320.00 I. Do S320. DD 1 6' PVC WATERMAIN LF 460 $14.20 15.00 5213.00 455.00 $6,461.00 2 8' PVC WATERMAIN LF 1980 516.20 64.00 $1.036.90 1.964.00 $31,816.80 3 12' PVC WATERMAIN LF 965 $24.50 956m00 $23.42100 956.W $23,422.00 4 FTIMNG5 LBS 4500 $1.70 4.415.00 $7.505.50 4,915.00 $8,355.50 5 HYDRANT W/ GV EA 5 52.000.00 0.00 Sow 5.00 sio,womoo 6 6m DATE VALVE EA I $425.00 1.00 $425.00 100 $850.00 7 S' GATE VALVE EA 8 $570.00 3.W SI-710m 7.00 8 12' VALVE EA 2 $760.00 1.00 5760.00 1.00 $760.00 9 VALVE ROD EXTENSION EA 11 $95.00 0.00 50.00 0,00 $0.00 10 1" SERVICE CONNECTION W/ CURB STOP EA 48 5150.00 ISM 52,700.00 39.00 $5.700.00 11 1' COPPER SERVICE PIPE LF 1095 $5.30 940.00 $4.982.00 IM0.00 $7,632.00 12 DIRECTIONAL BORE I' COPPER SERVICE PIPE LF 400 $25.00 loomm $2,500.00 100.00 $2,500.00 13 JACKmBORF, I8' STEEL CASING PIPE LF so $125.00 MOG 515,000M 120.00 $15.000.00 14 GRANULAR FOUNDATION MATERIAL CY 600 50.01 0.00 $0.00 100.00 $1.00 15 GRANULAR BEDDING MATERIAL CY 600 $0,01 0.00 $0.00 0.00 Sow 16 STANDARD PROCTOR EA 3 $85m 0.00 $0.00 2.00 $370.00 17 IN-PLACE DENSITY EA 20 S40M omoo SOMDO 5.00 $200.00 T SCHEDULE 5.0 WATERMAIN CONSTRUCTION TOTAL 560374.30 $117.179.30 oAprojU60089#2 PAGE 2 KIM IT SCHEDULE fi fi,,9AN[TARY SEWER CONSTRUCTION I RECONSTRUCT MANHOLE LS 1 $550.00 1.00 5550.00 1.00 $550m 2 8 PVC (0 TO 8' DEEP) LF 675 515.00 215.00 $5,225.00 945.00 $12,675.00 3 S' PVC (8' TO 10' DEEP) LF 955 $16.00 0.00 $0.00 1,000.00 $16,000.00 4 8" PVC (10'M 12' DEEP) LF 200 $17.00 0.00 $0.00 200.00 $3.400.00 5 8* PVC (12'.14' DEEP) LF 230 $19.00 0.00 $0.00 230.00 $4,140.00 6 SANITARY MANHOLE (0' TO 9 DEEP) EA 10 $1,270.00 0.00 $0.00 lom $12,700.00 7 MANHOLE EXTRA DEPTH (> 8' DEEP) LF 20 $&0.00 20.00 $800.00 20.00 $1,600,00 8 CONCRETE MANHOLE COLLAR EA to $70.0 0.00 som 0.00 $0.00 9 ADJUSTING RING EA 10 $20.0 0.00 $0.00 0.00 Som 10 CONSTRUCT OUTSIDE DROP EA 1 $1.000.00 0.00 $0.00 1.00 $t'owoo I I OUTSIDE DROP EXTRA DEPTH (> FEET) LF 5 $140.00 0.00 $0.00 5.00 5700.00 12 8" X 4" WYE EA 43 $40.00 12.00 5.480.00 32.00 $1,290.00 13 4' PVC SERVICE PIPE LF 1604 $5.00 357.00 $2,735.00 1.357.00 $6,785.00 14 GRANULAR FOUNDATION MATERIAL CY 400 $0.01 0.00 $0.00 100.00 $1.00 15 GRANULAR BEDDING MATERIAL CY 400 $0.01 0.00 $0.00 0.00 $0.00 16 STANDARD PROCTOR EA 3 $85.00 0.00 $0.00 1.00 595.00 17 IN-PLACE DENSITY EA 25 $40.00 0.00 50.00 5.00 $200.00 T SCHEDULE 6.0 SANITARY SEWER CONSTRUCTION - TOTAL $7.840.00 $61,116.00 AMAT.TERNATER MEADOINI,AWMlr.RTk�lYnI.�FNI'ENSIO I CONNECT TO EXISTING GRAIN TILE EA 2 $340.00 0.00 Soloo 0.00 $0.00 2 SUBGRADE PREPARATION RD STA 1.6 $150.00 10 $240.00 1.60 324000 3 MODIFIED SELECT GRANULAR BORROW (P) CY 390 $8.30 390,00 $3.315.00 390.00 $3,315.00 4 GEOTEXTILE FABRIC SY 660 31.00 650.00 1650.00 650.00 $650.00 5 MILL BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT SY is $25.00 0,00 $0.00 0.00 $0.00 6 AGGREGATE BASE, CLASS 5 TON 210 $12.00 210.00 $2.520.00 210.00 $2.520.00 7 TYPE 41 A. WEAR COURSE MIXTURE TON 50 $65,00 0.00 $0.00 0.00 SBOO 3 TYPE 318, BASE COURSE MIXTURE TON 50 $60.00 0.00 $0.00 000 $0.00 9 BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR TACK COAT GAL 25 $3.00 0.00 $0.00 0.00 $0.00 10 CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER, SURMOUNTABLE LF 320 $6.50 320,00 $2,080.00 320.W $2.080.00 11 4' CONCRETE SIDEWALK SF 910 $2.00 0.00 50.00 0.00 50.00 12 CONNECT TO EXISTING WATEMAIN EA 1 $320.00 0.00 50.00 1.00 $320.00 13 9" PVC W&TERMAIN LF 156 $14.25 0.00 $0.00 169.00 $2,408.25 14 FITTINGS LBS [to $1,80 0.00 $0.00 0.00 $0.00 15 1' SERVICE CONNECTION W/ CURB STOP EA 3 $150.00 0.00 $0.00 5.00 $750.00 16 1' COPPER SERVICE PIPE LF 85 56.60 0.00 $0.00 203.00 $1.339.80 17 CONNECT TO EXISTING SANITARY SEWER EA I 5400.00 0.00 50.00 1.00 5400.00 18 S" PVC (0 TO 3' VEEP) LF 117 S19.10 0.00 so.w 117.00 52,234.70 19 SANITARY MANHOLE (0' TO B' DEEP) EA 1 $1,275.00 0.99 $1,257.00 1.00 $1.275.00 20 CONCRETE MANHOLE COLLAR EA 1 $70.00 om $0.00 0.00 50.00 21 8' X 4' WYE EA 3 540.00 0.00 $0.00 5.00 $200.00 21A MANHOLE EXTRA DEPTH (> 8' DEEP) L.F. 9.5 $80.00 0.00 $0.00 9.50 3760.00 22 4* PVC SERVICE PIPE LF 95 55.00 0.00 Som 299.00 $1,445.00 23 GRANULAR FOUNDATION MATERIAL CY 40 10.01 0.00 50.00 40.00 50.40 24 GRANULAR BEDDING MATERIAL CY Q $0.01 0.00 som 0.00 $0.00 25 STANDARD PROCTOR EA 1 $95.00 0.00 $0.00 0.00 30.00 26 IN-PLACE DENSITY EA 5 $40.00 0.00 Soko 0.00 $0.00 27 SUBGRADE DENSITY TEST, INPLACE EA 1 $40.00 0.00 $0.00 0.00 $0.00 28 CLASS 5 GRADATION TEST EA 1 $65.00 0.00 $0.00 0.00 $0.00 29 CLASS 5 PROCTOR TEST EA 1 $85.00 0.00 $0.00 0.00 $0.00 30 CLASS 5 DENSITY TEST, INPLACE EA 1 $40.00 0,00 50.00 0.00 $6.00 31 CONCRETE TESTING EA 1 $135.00 0.00 $0.00 0.00 $0.00 32 BITUMINOUS CORE DENSITY TESTING EA 2 5350.00 0.00 $0.00 0.00 10.00 T BED ALTERNATE B - TOTAL 510,062.00 $19.938.15 o:iprojU60089#2 PAGE 3 xmcs RIDALTERNATECT THERMOPT.A.Mr DRAM TILF C.DN9TRU C 1 4" PERFORATED THERMOPLASTIC DRAIN PIPE LF 4820 $5.40 ODD s0.00 0.00 so-ou 2 4" x 4- DRAIN TILE TEE FA 23 $22.00 0.00 $0.00 0.00 50.00 BID ALTERNATE Cl THERMOPLASTIC DRAIN TILE - TOTAL 50.00 $0.00 BIn ALTERNATE rl POLYF.THTI. �. DRAIN TUA CONqTRUCTIQ 1 4' CORR, POLYETHYLENE PE TUBING LF 4820 54.70 0.00 50,00 0.00 $0.00 2 4'. V DRAIN TILE TEE EA 23 $25.00 0.00 $0.00 0.00 $0.00 BID ALTERNATE C2 POLYETHYLENE DRAIN TILE - TOTAL som $om DESCRUPTION SCHEDULE 1.0 SITEVORK - TOTAL 5325.00 $325.00 SCHEDULE 2.0 STREET CONSTRUCTION - TOTAL $108.809.00 $108.809.00 SCHEDULE 3.0 BITUMINOUS TRAIL CONSTRUCTION - TOTAL $0.00 $0.00 SCHEDULE 4.0 STORM SEWER CONSTRUCTION - TOTAL $39,173.00 $39,173.00 SCHEDULE 5-0 WATERMAIN CONSTRUCTION - TOTAL $60.574.30 $117,178.30 SCHEDULE 6.0 SANITARY SEWER CONSTRUCTION - TOTAL $7,840.00 $61,116.00 DID ALTERNATE B - TOTAL $10.062.00 $19,938.15 BUD ALTERNATE Cl THERMOPLASTIC DRAIN TILE - TOTAL $0.00 som BID ALTERNATE C2 POLYETHYLENE DRAIN TILE TOTAL som $0.00 TOTAL 5226.781.30 $346.539.45 AMOUNT EARNED $226,783.30 $346,539,45 AMOUNT RETAINED • $11,339.17 $17.326,97 MATERIAL ON SITE $0.00 $0.00 MATERIAL DEDUCT. $0.00 so.w ... ... ... P REVIOUS PAYMENTS .................................. ....... 50.00 ..... ... • AMOUNT DOE $215.444.14 $329,212. .48 o!lproj1260089#2 PAGE 4 OCT 22 '58 1.5: Wb .eew —+ arm I hereby certify that all items and amounts shown by this pay ratimate ale correct for the work completed to data. CONTPACTOR. BONfNE CAVATING, INC. BY: lL OX-1 -A-L- 1TTIX: G — DATE: Based on the ENGINEER'S on -site inspections as all experienced and qualified design professional and on review of appitcadou for payment and the accompanying data and schedules, the ENGINEER has determined, to the best of his knowledge and belief, that the quantities shown by this estimate are correct and that, based on such inspecdon> and review, that the work has progressed to the point indicated (subject to an avatuatlot: of sucb work as a iirtretiortiug Pro3ect upon Substantial Completion, to the results of ant subsequent testa required by the Contract DocumentS, and to any qualifications suited in Itia ree romendation), and that payrowd of the amount recomrotuded is due Contraetaris'. but by rec ummendidg aay payment, the ENGINEER will not thereby be deemed to batie reviewed the means, methods, sequences, tecitmques, or proceedures of conattoct3o3 of safety precautions or programs incident thereto or that the BNGINM has made all exaWinatlon to aseirtsin how or for what purpose any Contractor bas used the monies paid on account of the Contract price, or that title to any of rho work, materials, or equipment has passed to the Owner tree and clear of any Lein, claims, secutRY intereets or encumbrances, or that the Couttactor(s) have completed their woflt exactly in accordance with the Contact Documents. ENGINEER: HOWARD GREEN COMPANY BY: TITLE: �im�Lcf 4Y1av DATE: Approved by OwnerlCommission CITY 4F CENTERS'fLLE. MINNESOTA BY: TITLE: _ DATE: Pod ST:Ei 8661 -ice 1`t0 60/90'd / 10/21/1998 09:04 4911407 PAGE 02 1 1 Oct. 20th, 1998 City of Centerville Park & Rec. Committee Re: Buechler Estates Development Dear Park & Rec. Committee: i As a follow -up to our meeting with the City Council last evening, please accept this lefter as a summary of our position. We had been told that the Park and Rae fees would be $950100 per lot for 5 lots, fnr a totat = $4,750.00, and we reasonably relied an those statements In all of our work done up to this point. We have incurred substantial fees already In getting the project to this stage. Had we been told up front the truth about the Park and Roe Fees, we may have scrapped this project altogether, or at least deducted the Park & Rae fees from our purchase price. It is not only us who were told that the Park & Rao fees were $ 950.00 per lot; every developer we spoke to told us the same thing, that they had never heard of the City's rlgh; to Charge up to 10% of the purchase price. Instead, we were informed of the additional fees well after the fact, and after considerable fees had already been spent by us. We feel that ':he Council is potentially being short- sighted in this matter, particularly those members that sta'ed that they would like to see the fees set at 10% of the costs of the land. You are currently receiving next to nothing in taxes on that property, even though you have some responsibilty for maintenance. We are proposing to pay $4000.00 per lot for 5 lots In Park & Roe fees. If our development was approved as we have proposed, you would not only receive $20,000.0C in Park & Rae fees, you would also have five homes paying approximately $6,000.00 per yea' in property taxes. The cow.. impact on the City of these five homes would be extremely minirlal, much less than virtually any other proposed use. In short, our development, as proposed, would be a win -win situation for both us and the City_ However, if the City insists on getting 10% of; he costs of the land in Park and Rec fees, they will lose our development (we will have to cari :el our purchase agreement or modify it), and another year will go by without the City receiving any substantial amount of taxes from that property, Instead, if our development is approved, 'he homes can go up for construction immediately, and the City should start receiving additional .ax revenues as soon as the year 2000 (1999 taxes will be for a vacant lot, regardless of how quickly construction V.ts started), We further understand your reluctance to set a preced3nt with our property, and we submit that our development will not set one that will prohibit you from collecting up to 10% in the future. We were told by everyone at the City that the foes would be $950.00 per H and based all of our work on that figure. We were substantially along in our development work when we were informed of the potential Increase in fees. We do ?got want to scrap the project, and we feel strongly that it is not in the best interests of the City to have us back out, either The City claims that it has changed or is in the process of changing its procedures in providing information to developers, so that this situation, where a developer 1aas mis- informed about the fees they would be required to pay, Cannot occur again. If that Wthe I ! f i 1 _7/21/1998 09:04 4811407 PAGE 03 case, then the City could agree to accept a compromise amount from us in the sum of $4,000,00 per lot, and not have it set a precedent for future development. All future develop'Drs will get accurate information, and will go into the project fully aware of potential amount of he Park and Roc fees involved, which is not the case with us. They could not rely on our situation to receive a reduced amount. We are paying $500,000.00 for the land, if our proposed development is approved. Ne have an option to back out of the Purchase Agreement, if we do not receive approval for '"our development from the City. If we are charged 10% for the Park & Rae fees, we cant poss' proceed with the project, and the land will presumably sit there vacant for the time being. To charge us $50,000.00 in Park & Rae fees for the development of 5 homes is blatantly unfair. Five homes cannot possibly place that much of a burden on the City in terms of Parka s nd Recreation. It seems to us that the charging of 10% Is something that should be reserved for multi - housing projects where the density Is much greater and the burdens on the City may warrant such an amount Please let us know what your recommendation is, and we will then quickly take appropriate action. 4 Sincerely, Carl D. Buechler b i i i j t N t J i MEMO DATE : October 23, 1998 TO Honorable Mayor and Council FROM: Jim March RE Request from Dennis Schudy to lease park property �� * «s +�� +� + + + + « *r «* art***+*** r* s* r��*++ a� *�� +�r�r�r *�� + + *�� *� + *■v�r *�r■ As you may recall, Mr. Dennis Schudy had inquired about purchasing the approximate two acre Cedar Street Park. Mr. Schudy has since then requested a lease to use the property as a temporary ready mix concrete plant. I have since found the documentation from former City Attorney Greg Hellings in regards to the status of the ownership of the parcel. Enclosed in your packet is a copy of a letter addressed to Greg Hellings from March of 1997. I will be forwarding this information to current City Attorney Jim Hoeft. This issue has not yet been addressed by the Park and Recreation committee. Jim March; 10/8/98 City Administrator City of Centerville I submitted a proposal to the city on the 15th of September about a two -acre parcel of land the city owns in the southeast portion of the city. I would like to amend that proposal. My intention would be to lease the property from the city for two years with an option for more, to run a redi -mix cement business on the property. The city would be able to keep the land for their future development and still receive revenue from the property. Looking at the trees on the property, there would be no need to remove any large trees, but only remove some of the brush within the center. At the removal of the business, there would be no remaining remnants of the business, but a clearing inside the woods. I would like to work with the city public works director to be sure this is done in an acceptable manner. After talking to a couple of Realtors that deal in industrial property, they were able to offer some advice on an equitable lease amount, which would be in the area of eight thousand dollars per year. Also included as a supplement to the lease payment, would be a twelve- percent reduction in the price of concrete for city projects, based on the price charged by the local suppliers. If you feel this proposal could benefit the city, then I would like to meet with the city attorney to work out terms and condi ions that would be agreeable to both parties. Sincerely, Dennis Shudy 6795 20th Ave. S Hugo, MN. 55038 O�T COUNTY OF ANOKA Office of Governmental Services Division GOVERNMENT CENTER 2100 3rd Avenue • Anoka, Minnesota 55303 -2265 (612) 323 -5680 GENE RAFFERTY Land Commissioner Direct #323 -5427 March 26, 1997 Gregory J. Hellings Attorney at Law 13000 Crooked Lake Blvd Coon Rapids, MN 55448 Re: City owned parcel 24 31 22 33 0002 Dear Mr. Hellings: I have your March 18th, 1997 letter at hand. The land in its present status cannot be sold to a developer. The parcel was acquired under a restricted deed for the specific public use of a park. It must be used for that purpose or be reconveyed to the state which returns it to forfeit status. See MS282.01 Subd. id. For the City of Centerville to obtain an unrestricted deed, which would allow them to sell to a developer, they must reconvey the property to the state and make application to acquire the parcel for a nonspecific public use paying the appraised price as established by the County Board. The city council should adopt a resolution directing the mayor and the city clerk /administrator to execute the necessary documents to reconvey the parcel to the State of Minnesota and make application to acquire the property for a nonspecific public use. Both of these documents (enclosed) can be completed at the same time and forwarded to me along with the council resolution. FAX: 323.5682 Affirmative Action ! Equal Opportunity Employer TDDrM: 323 -5269 -40-1 These actions require approval of the County Board. When I receive the reconveyance and application documents it will be put on the County Board agenda for their consideration. The current assessor's market value on the parcel is $15,000.00. Any questions, please call me. Yo�urs�^ Very Truly, Gen e Raffert}f Anoka County Land Commissioner Enclosures GRJsk c Commissioner Berg Commissioner Langfeld Dan Klint Jim Parch, Centerville Clerk /Administrator 24 3122 33 0002 Centerville Commissioner Langfeld Department of Revenue SDr( .nn 9751nev. 11175) Approved by Attorney General 7 -2069 RECONVEYANCE OF FORFEITED LANDS TO STATE OF MINNESOTA BY GOVERNMENTAL SUBDIVISIONS WHEREAS, Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 282.01, Subdivision 1, the STATE OF MINNESOTA, as trustee under Minnesota Statutes, Section 281.25, on the 16th _ day of June 19 7 2 , conveyed to __ Cit of Centerville _ _ O rigi na l Deed No.: 141732 a governmental subdivision, the lands hereinafter described, to be used for an authorized public use, and WHEREAS, Said governmental subdivision "has failed to put such land to the public use for which it was conveyed 'has abandoned the public use for which such land was conveyed, and now desires to reconvey said lands to the State of Minnesota, as such trustee, NOW, THEREFORE, This indenture, made this day between _ Cit of_ Ce a governmental subdivision of the State of Minnesota, as party of the first part, and the State of Minnesota, as trustee as hereinafter set forth, as party of the second part, WITNESSETH, That the said party of the first part, in consideration of the premises and other valuable considerations, the receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, does hereby Grant, Bargain, Quitclaim and Reconvey unto the said party of the second part all the tract or parcel of land lying and being in the County of Anoka in the State of Minnesota, described as follows, to -wit: See attached Exhibit A in trust as provided by Minnesota Statutes, Section 281.25, upon like conditions and with like effect as if said lands had not been conveyed to said party of the first part as aforesaid. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD THE SAME, Together with all the hereditaments and appurtenances thereunto belonging or in anywise appertaining, to the said party of the second part and its successors and assigns, Forever. IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, Said party of the first part has caused these presentsto be executed in its corporate name by its Mayor and its __ — _ __ and its corporate seal to be hereunto affixed the day and year first above written. In Presence of: Citv of Ce_nterville__ __ Name of Governmental Subdivision 'Strike out clause riot applicable. STATE OF MINNESOTA I County of I ss. On this clay of _ _ __ , 19 _, before me, a _ _ within and for said county, personally appeared 1 -- - - -- - -- _ and - "> to me personally known, who, being each by me duly sworn say that they are respectively the and the of the governmental subdivision named in the foregoing instrument, and that the seal affixed to said instrument is the corporate seat of said governmental subdivision, and that said instrument was signed and sealed in behalf of said governmental subdivision by authority of its and said aril acknowledged said instrument to be the free act and deed of said governmental subdivision. APPROVAL The undersigned, acting for the Commissioner of Revenue of the State of Minnesota, under delegation of authority duly filed with the Secretary of State, does hereby approve the foregoing conveyance to the State of Minnesota. Dated: STATE OF MINNESOTA In the Presence of: Commissionet of Revenue ___ —_ By No. THIS ! STRUNIENT WAS DEED RECONVEYING FORFEITED DRAFTED BY: LANDS to STATE OF MINNESOTA by GOVERNMENTAL SUBDIVISIONS Name Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 252.01, Subd. I Address TO STATE OF MINNESOTA OFFICE OF REGISTER OF DEEDS STATE OF MINNESOTA, }ss. County of JJJ I hereby certify that the within Deed was filed in this office for record on the day of A. D. 19_, at o'cloc M ,, and was duly recorded in Boo of Deeds, on pag Register of Deeds. By D EXHIBIT A The East 410 feet of the South 205 feet of the Southwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter (SW1 /4 of SW1 /4) of Section 24, Township 31, Range 22 together with an easement over that part of the South 20 feet of the Southwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter (SW1 /4 of SW1 /4) of Section 24, Township 31, Range 22 lying between the point where the South line of Section 24 intersects County Road 54, commonly known as Cedar Street and the West line of the above described property. This easement shall be effective only in the event that the grantees herein have no other access to said County road from the property conveyed herein. 26 31 22 33 0002 Guuctauvii IL G0111[1JjS.Si0L1Cr Lan " Form No. 2507.8-iJpiomiii it i,i lak:0,,ri N,,,!12 Milh, 11... w k1i .... i,rR11.1i! APPLICATION BY GOVERNMENTAL SUBDIVISION FOR CONVEYANCE OF TAX-FORFEITED LANDS Jlinulx(da Mviiiii 282.01 In theAtatter of ... C ill -, qnti�wrx ... I.f ... _ _ ....................... ...................... ....... ........................ a Governnventat Subdiri8jon, for a Conveyance of Certain Lantla. Comes now . of Centerville and alleges ...... Y.I., ..... ...1.11 .... 1. ..1. .1- ...... ...... ................ ......... .... ......................... .- (n.o,C of *.b4W.ioo) 1. That applicant is a ( CuveTnmentcil Subdivis1q,11 ......... .......... ...................................................... .... 2. That (b) ............ 3, That there is situated within applicant's boundaries in the County of ...... l�[Aqkq ............. .............. ............. certain tax - forfeited [and described as follows: - . . .. . ...... ...... . .... .. ... _ ......... ......... ..... ................. _ . .......... . ........ - .......... The East 410 feet of the South 205 feet of the Southwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter (SWJ of SW of Section 24, Township 31, Range 22 together with an easement over that part of the South 20 feet of the Southwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter (SW� of SW}) of Section 24, Township 31, Range 22 lying between the point where the South line of Section 24 intersects County Road 54, commonly known as Cedar Street and the West line of the above described property. This easement shall be effective only in the event that the grantees herein have no other access to said County Road from the property conveyed herein. 4 . That said lands are (c) ................. Kxi .... ............................................................... .................... ........ ..... 5. That applicant desires to obtain ,quid land for the following purposes: (d) .... Public.. ........................... 6. That there is need for such lands for the following reasons: .... ....... 1 ..... I ................... I ........ 1rherefore applicant prays that said lands be. conveyed to it for the use stated herein. ....... ..............C.i .... of . ... C.e.n�t.eKyille__ ..... ............................... Ry .. . . ...... Its ...... Ma.YRK ........................................................ ....... ...... %nd .1 ....... .................... __ ........ I., ...... I ... I— ... I ............................ I ....... Its ..... ..................... .................................................. iptate of Jflhlllleota, County ....... ..... ..... ...... ... _................_....... ee. ... ..... I—, ........ .. .. ..... ........ - ................. -.1 ... ..... .......... ..................... ...., ... each being llrst ditty sworn, depose and say, each for himself, that they are respeeUvety the .............. .......... .................... . ............... .. ............... and_ ................ . . ............ - _ ......... ... ._ ........ of thet ... ........... . ............. ...... ............ ......... .. . .. .......... ... ..... .. - - .. , ... .. ... _ - ; that fifty have read the foregoing application and k now the contents thereof; and that the ; stated therein are true. .......... ........ .... ... . ... . ....... ........... I .................... ....... Subscribed and sworn to before rue this ....................... ... .. ... ..... 19_.. ........ ................... ..................... ............ .......... ................................... ............... Notary Public ........ ................. .... ......... County, .Minn. 11W ill* Tact/ otitti,e to l Crgtoimi.n. , allie Ucto sho"'i"K out Ml,i of arquitititol rr land Ittteintiftitr described by resolution of governing body or by Yowl, tic., at the Colo It 0 1 11 imcbing cop p if kni, 4,11"111,111 R "d., use of 'U'Nolitfti, too ar C, t arid E; bititothl of lacla a to the ate 16 * hkil e ouch RESOLUTION OF COUNTY BOARD UPON APPLICA'T'ION WMA't {F..48, the County Board of _... ANOKA,._ ,.,., ,._,,...County, Minnesota, has examined into the allegations of the application of......_ ... . .... ............................_.........................._.............................._........,. ............................... dated _. .__....._._..... ....._..._....__ ............... 19_......._., for the conveyance of certain lands therein described; now, Therefore, be it resolved by the County IA>ard of ... ..... ....... ._..........ANO .... _.....County, Minnesota, that it hereby _._....._.approves said application and recommends that the same be ... _ .....................granted. ...................... _................. I ... ..... ... .. ... ._.._ ._ ........................ . _..........._..._..... _ . ... ..... .... ...................... ........ ..... ........ ..... ........... ............... ..... ....... _..... .... _ ...... ............................... County Board of said County 6tate of AinnfWta, County of ....__... ANOKA sa. .................... ............................... I, ................. _. ... ..._... .... .._.. ................... ...__..,._........ .......... ........ ............. county auditor and clerk of the County Hoard of .................. _.......... ........... __ ............... --- ... .County, Minnesota, hereby certify that I have compared the foregoing copy of resolution of the County Board of said county with the, original record thereof is the minutes of the proceedings of said board at a meeting duly held _ . ................ _.. ............ , 19 . _, and that the santC. is a true and correct copy of said original record and of the whole thereof, and that said resolution was duly adopted by said board at said meeting, I further certify that the application referred to in said resolution is hereto attached. TT'itness my hand and seal this ..... ......................................................... day of .................... ---1 . County ✓luditor and Cleric of the County Board .................. . .......... ANOKA ............... .._. _._County, Minnesota OFFICE OF T1IF,' CONMISSIONElt OF TAX.ITION St . Paul, .Alin.a.. _. ...... _ ....... .... ._.. ..... ........ — ...... _.. ..... 19.. _.._.. Upon due consideration of the within application it is ordered that the same be and it is hereby rejec "ed granted. ...... ...... .................... ._...._...._. ..... ... .......................... Commissioner of Taxation I1 y _._...._.__..._.......__..._.. ..__....__.. .... _...,._ .._...... Deputy o3 0i &4 U Z G14 z o &4 Q V � MEMORANDUM DATE: October 23, 1998 TO: Honorable Mayor and Council FROM Ry -Chel Gaustad, CMC City Clerk RE: Otter Lake Animal Control Contract The City Attorney will be reviewing the Otter Lake Animal Control Contract and will be present at the Council meeting to discuss the 1999 Contract. Please call me if you have any questions or need additional information. Have a great weekend. MEMO DATE : October 23, 1998 TO Honorable Mayor and Council FROM: Jim March RE Sprinkler system connection charges ****** � *:r� »� *►r +� * +� +� * +�� *� * * * * *�� +* sus* � * *w *rx * « +� *M + *��►� *�sa +�� *� +* Included in your packet is a copy of a letter that was received from the owner of Swift Construction. This is an issue that has not been brought forth previously by any other builder to my knowledge. The townhome complex in Eagle Pass would be the largest private sprinkler system we have in the City. We will be researchi g this issue more fully and survey surrounding cities to see how they address this issue and bring the results to the next meeting. SWIFT CONSTRUCTION,, INC. 92a' ? ?.LT i,IOR ST =.EET N I .E. • ELAINE, MINNESOTA 55a49. 5121783 -1000 • FAX 512;733 -1921 September 16, 1998 Jim March - City Administrator City of Centerville 1880 Main Street Centerville, MN 55038 Dear Mr. March, I am the owner and builder of Eagle Pass townhomes and single family homes, a planned development totaling approximately 100 units once totally completed. Both home styles have separate homeowners associations. A common element to both associations is a lawn sprinkler system. On September 2nd of this year, I was informed by your office that Centerville charges a water connection fee of $1,300 per water tap for lawn sprinkler systems Due to project design, size, and development patterns, a total of 18 individual water taps may be required to complete the sprinkler system for the entire project. The permitting cost for this system is an unbelievable $33,400. This constitutes approximately 30% of the construction cost of the entire system.. which is not a budgeted item. I build in many communities but have never encountered such a high permit cost. I have had the opportunity to discuss this issue with several other communities. Without exception, they use the impact on the sanitary sewer system as the basis for determining thF number of ronn Pf_6-1, fee- va,ioi)q 19nd 11CPS Would uenerAtP, 140uvevt tjle" Hn charge tapping toes which cover the cost of the required inspections. By charging a connection fee for a sprinkler system, you are saying that it is equivalent to a residential unit, which it is not The principle reasons most communities charge connection fees are for debt retirement, Iona range capital improvements, and system maintenance. To calculate the amount of the connection charge, communities use the utility and land use elements of the comprehensive plans -which is the most accurate way to measure and project the need tot revenue. I rather doubt that Centerville has a chapter in their comprehensive plans pertaining to sprinkler systems. EPWATER.WPS A sprinkler system is a desirable improvement option for any development whether residential, commercial, or industrial. You should encourage the installation of sprinkler systems which produce positive benefits for the community as a whole. Your current ordinance places a serious financial burden and discriminates against those projects which by design, size, or environmental factors, must have multiple taps to install a sprinkler system. Please keep in mind that any sprinkler system that is installed, no matter how extensive, that uses a source of water other than a water tap pays no connection fees. In conclusion, I feel strongly that your current ordinance dealing with this issue lacks rational foundation, is grossly unfair, and is inconsistent with most other communities in the region. Please accept this letter as a petition to amend the ordinance at issue at your earliest convenience and a request for reimbursment for fees already paid. Forward any documents that may be required to my office. I would be happy to discuss this issue with you in greater detail. Thank you for your anticipated help in this matter. Bill G. Roessler President Swift Construction, Inc. EPWATER.WPS RESOLUTION 98 -23 RESOLUTION ELECTING TO CONTINUE PARTICIPATION IN THE LOCAL HOUSING INCENTIVES ACCOUNT PROGRAM UNDER THE METROPOLITAN LIVABLE COMMUNITIES ACT CALENDAR YEAR 1999 WHEREAS, the Metropolitan Livable Communities Act (Minnesota Statues Section 473.25 to 473254) establishes a Metropolitan Livable Communities Fund which is intended to address housing and other development issues facing the metropolitan area defined by Minnesota Statutes section 473.121, and WHEREAS, the Metropolitan Livable Communities Fund, comprising the Tax Base Revitalization Account, the Livable Communities Demonstration Account and the Local Housing Incentive Account, is intended to provide certain funding and other assistance to metropolitan area municipalities; and WHEREAS, a metropolitan area municipality is not eligible to receive grants or loans under the Metropolitan Livable Communities Fund or eligible to receive certain polluted sites cleanup funding from the Minnesota Department of Trade and Economic Development unless the municipality is participating in the Local Housing Incentives Account Program under the Minnesota Statutes section 473.254; and WHEREAS, the Metropolitan Livable Communities Act requires the Metropolitan Council to negotiate with each municipality to establish affordable and life -cycle housing goals for that municipality that are consistent with and promote the policies of the Metropolitan Council as provided in the adopted Metropolitan Development Guide; and WHEREAS, each municipality must identify to the Metropolitan council the actions the municipality plans to take to meet the established housing goals through preparation of the Housing Action Plan; and WHEREAS, the Metropolitan Council adopted, by resolution after a public hearing, affordable and life -cycle housing goals for each participating municipality; and WHEREAS, a metropolitan area municipality which elects to participate in the Local Housing Incentives Account Program must do so by November 15 of each year, and WHEREAS, for calendar year 1999, a metropolitan area municipality that did participate in the Local Housing Incentive Account Program during the calendar year 1998, and can continue to participate under Minnesota Statutes section 473.254 only if (a) the municipality elects to participate in the Local Housing Incentives Account Program by November 15, 1998; and (b) the Metropolitan Council and the municipality have successfully negotiated affordable and life -cycle housing goals for the municipality: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT the City of Centerville hereby elects to participate in the Local Housing Incentives Program under the Metropolitan Livable Communities Act during the calendar year 1999. Mayor Tom Wilharber ATTEST: Ry -Chel Gaustad, CMC City Clerk CITY OF CENTERVILLE ANOKA COUNTY, MINNESOTA An Amendment to Ordinance 44B Adopting the Minnesota State Building Code 1997 AN AMENDMENT ADOPTING THE MINNESOTA STATE BUILDING CODE. THIS AMENDMENT: PROVIDES FOR THE APPLICATION, ADiV11MSTRATION, AND ENFORCEMENT OF THE MINNESOTA STATE BUILDING CODE BY REGULATING THE ERECTION, CONSTRUCTION, ENLARGEMENT, ALTERATION, REPAIR, MOVING, REMOVAL, DEMOLITION, CONVERSION, OCCUPANCY, EQUIPMENT, USE, HEIGHT, AREA, AND MAINTENANCE OF ALL BUILDINGS AND /OR STRUCTURES IN THIS MUNICIPALITY, PROVIDES FOR THE ISSUANCE OF PERMITS AND COLLECTION OF FEES THEREOF; PROVIDES PENALTIES FOR VIOLATION THEREOF; REPEALS ALL ORDINANCES AND PARTS OF ORDINANCES THAT CONFLICT THEREWITH. This City Council of the City of Centerville does ordain as follows: Sect ion 1. Application, Administration and Enforcement. The application, administration, and enforcement of the code shall be in accordance with Minnesota rule part 1300.2100 and as modified by chapter 1305. The code shall be enforced within the extraterritorial limits permitted by Minnesota statute 16B.62 subdivision 1 when so established by this ordinance. The code enforcement agency of this municipality is called the City Council. A Minnesota certified Building Official must be appointed by this jurisdiction to administer the code (Minnesota statute 16B.65). Sect ion 2. Permits and Fees. The issuance of permits and the collection of fees shall be as authorized in Minnesota statute 16B.62 subdivision l and as provided for in chapter 1 of the 1997 Uniform Building Code and Minnesota rules parts 1305.0106 and 1305.0107. Permit fees shall be assessed for work governed by this code in accordance with this ordinance. In addition, a surcharge fee shall be collected on all permits issued for work governed by this code in accordance with Minnesota statute 1613_70. Sect ion 3. Violations and Penalties. A violation of the code is a misdemeanor (Minnesota statute 16GB.69). Se ction 4. Building Code. The Minnesota State Building Code, established pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 16B.59 to 168.75 is hereby adopted as the building code for this jurisdiction. The code is hereby incorporated in this ordinance as if fully set out herein. A. The Minnesota State building Code includes the following chapter of Minnesota Rules: 1. 1300 Minnesota Building Code 2. 1301 Building Official Certification 3. 1302 State Building construction Approvals 4. 1305 Adoption of the 1997 Uniform Building Code including Appendix Chapters: a. 3, Division I, Detention and Correctional Facilities b. 12, Division II, Sound Transmission Control C. 15, Reroofing d. 16, Division I, Snowload Design e. 29, Minimum Plumbing Fixtures f. 31, Division 11, Membrane Structures 5. 1307 Elevators and Related Devices 6. 1315 Adoption of the 1996 National Electrical Code 7. 1325 Solar Energy Systems 8. 1330 Fallout Shelters 9. 1335 Floodproofing Regulations 10. 1340 Facilities for the Handicapped 11. 1346 Adoption of the 1991 Uniform Mechanical Code 12. 1350 Manufactured Homes 13. 1360 Prefabricated Buildings 14. 1361 Industrialized/Modular Buildings 15. 1370 Storm Shelters (Manufactured Home Parks) 16. 47 t 5 Minnesota Plumbing Code 17. 7670 Minnesota Energy Code B. This municipality may adopt by reference any or all of the following optional appendix chapters of the 1997 Uniform Building Code as authorized by Minnesota rule part 1305.0020 subpart 2: 3, Division I1I, 1992 One and Two Family Dwelling. The following optional appendix chapters of the 1997 Uniform Building Code are hereby adopted and incorporated as part of the building code for this municipality: 1. 33, Excavation and Grading C. This municipality may adopt by reference any or all of the following optional chapters of Minnesota rule: The following optional chapters of Minnesota rule are hereby adopted and incorporated as part of the building code for this municipality. 1. 1306, Special Fire Protection Systems with option 8 (Group M, S, or F occupancies with 2,000 or more gross square feet) or 8a (Group M, S, or F occupancies with 5,000 or more gross square feet). 2. 1335, Floodproofing regulations part 1335.0600 to 1335.1200. Sect ion 5. Effective Date of Ordinance. The effective date of this Ordinance shall take effect the day following publication in the City's official newspaper. Mayor Tom Wilharber ATTEST: Ry -Chel Gaustad, CMC City Clerk CITY OF CENTERVILLE PARK AND RECREATION COMMITTEE OCTOBER 7, 1998 Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, the Park and Recreation Committee of the City of Centerville held their regularly scheduled meeting on October 7, 1998 at City Hall. Dale Larson called the meeting to order at 6:50 p.m. PRESENT: Dale Larson Steve Brown Don Bahneman ABSENT: Chairperson Michael Navin Doug Porter STAFF: Jim March James Bownik CONSIDERATION OF MINUTES May 6, 1998 - Minutes approved. September 2, 1998 - Minutes approved. Motion to approve the May Meeting Minutes by Dale Larson. Motion seconded by Steve Brown. Motion carried unanimously. Motion to approve the September Meeting Minutes by Dale Larson. Motion seconded by Steve Brown. Motion carried unanimously. PETITIONS AND COMPLAINTS Gary Schmidt of 7071 Cottonwood Court expressed his interest in seeing a Footbridge connecting Cottonwood Court and Brian Court. UNFINISHED BUSINESS Clearwater Meadows Footbridge Update - Michael Navin The committee discussed the possibility of building a walkway bridge. Staff was directed to research past Minutes of the City Council and Park and Recreation Committee to see why it was never passed. LaMotte Park Grading Update Jim March, City Administrator, presented an update to the Committee. Everything is on schedule. Boards will be put up around the hockey rink October 23 -24 with the help of volunteer labor. The hockey rink should be ready to use this winter. Mr. March also sy mentioned that the City has received sealed bids on a new snow tractor. No action needed. Center Villa (Lake Area Utilities - 6994 20th Avenue) - Mr Willie Lessard Mr. Willie Lessard presented a preliminary plat proposal for the Center Villa Development. Mr. Lessard acknowledged that a few trees would be lost in extending the sidewalk to Brian Drive. The issue of park dedication fees was also discussed. Mr. March presented a hand -out of a survey on park dedication fees which was conducted by the Association of Metropolitan Municipalities. Motion was made by Dale Larson to recommend that the City Council accept $900 per lot or 10% of the value of the raw land, whichever is higher, as park dedication fees for the Center Villa Development. Motion seconded by Steve Brown. Motion carried unanimously. Dale Larson noted that the Park and Recreation Committee should consider recommending to the City Council an increase in the per lot fee for park dedication as per park dedication survey. Buechler Estates (mound Trail Development) - Mr. Carl Buechler The issue of park dedication fees was discussed. Mr. March noted that in all past cases the fee per lot has always exceeded the value of the land. Motion made by Dale Larson to ask Chairperson Michael Navin to represent the Park and Recreation Committee at the October 14, 1998 City Council meeting and submit a recommendation concerning the park dedication fees. Motion seconded by Steve Brown. Motion carried unanimously. NEW BUSINESS LaMotte Park Winter Schedule Applicants are needed for the warming house for January and February. Also discussed possible concessions or vending at the hockey rink. No action needed. DISCUSSION ITEMS November Agenda 1) Clearwater Meadows Footbridge Update 2) Buechler Estates (Mound Trail Development) - Park Dedication Fees 3) Lot Fee Adjustment for Park Dedication. ADJOURNMENT Motion to adjourn made by Dale Larson. Seconded by Don Bahneman. Motion carried unanimously. Meeting adjourned at 9:00 p.m. Respectfully Submitted, James Bownik, Administrative /Planning Intern