Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
1998-08-26 Packet
CITY COUNCIL MEETING WEDNESDAY, AUGUST 26, 1998 6:00 p.m. * * * * * * *5:00 p.m. Joint Workshop with Planning and Zoning to discuss the revised Shoreland Ordinance CA L TO ORDER Roll Call VII. PUB IC HEARING (S) 21st Avenue Public Hearing jo,wr Parkview Assessment Hearing tTa A PEARANCES 1 • Kristin Hanson (Ehlers & Associates) Present Bond Information for Parkview Development Resolution 98 -17 - Award Bo d Bid For Parkview Development V. CONSIDERATION OF MINUTES � August 19, 1998 Workshop Meeting Minutes PAYMENT OF CLAIMS The City of Centerville August 13- 26 11/ Pav Estimate #3 for 20th Avenue Improvements Centennial Fire District SET AGENDA V 11• PETITIONS AND COMPLAINT VII. UNNFINISHED BUSINESS V Addition - Storm Sewer Resolution 98 -18 Adopting Parkview Addition Assessment Roll The Woods of Clearwater Creek - Grading Plan Review - Preliminary Plat Consideration - Developers Agre ent LaMotte Park Consideratio f Bids Willie Lessard Rezone o ideration for 1994 - 20th Ave. !: -w IX. N BUSINESS Consulting Engineer Selection C MMITTEE O / TS vvv G4�Cc XI [ A / NISTRAT R REPO X11. CONSENT AGENDA 1. Resolution 998 -19 Electing to Continue Participating in the Local Housing Incentives Account Program Under the Metropolitan Livable Communities Act 2. Resolution 98 -01 Amend 1998 Appointments - Legal Newspaper - Press Publications - City Attorney - Barna, Guzy & Steffen, Ltd. 3. Annual Step Increase - Grade 5, Step 3 - City Clerk, based on Satisfactory Annual Performance Review 4. Bonine Excavating - Accept bid of $5,500 for demolition of Barett House XHI. ADJOURNMENT WEEK IN REVIEW Edition # 71 8/17-8/21 Building Permits this Period = 6 Building Permits YTD = 147 New Homes YTD = 83 * The internship position was accepted by James Bownik. James will be reporting to work on September 8, 1998. * Reminder! A joint meeting has been scheduled with the Police Commission to discuss the police department budget. The meeting is scheduled for August 24 at 7:00 P.M, at Circle Pines City Hall. * At the workshop on August 19, 1998, a budget workshop was scheduled for Wednesday, September 2, 1998. This workshop is scheduled to begin at 6:00. * The EDC committee has scheduled their next meeting for 7:00 on September 14, 1998. This will be their last meeting before the MN Design Team arrives on September 24. * Additional testing is being completed on the drain tile in the Eagle Pass development this week. Portions of the the are working, while other portions of the tile system are not. We have made it clear to the engineer and contractor that we expect all portions of the tile system to be inspected to insure that the system is functioning as designed. * An asphalt pad was installed and the stop sign adjusted at the corner of Progress Road and Main Street to better allow for pedestrians to navigate the crosswalk. I am working with Mike Hughes to coordinate obtaining written quotations for the design work for the flashing lights. * I am working to gather the information requested at the workshop in regards to the consulting engineer decision. I will be providing this written information to the City Council under sealed envelope early next week. * Reminder! Ajoint workshop was scheduled with the Planning and Zoning Commission at 5:00 prior to the next Council meeting to discuss the revisions to the shoreland management ordinance. * Mike Navin has been appointed the new chairman of the Park and Recreation commission with the resignation of Rick Thompson. * I received a phone call from Con -Spec. They are designing a 22,000 square foot facility to be leased to the school district for kindergarten classrooms. Howard R. Green Company IS CONSULTING ENGINEERS rOASIMIGLIG 6f33 Formerly MSA Consulting Engineers MEMORANDUM To: Mr. Jim March, City of Centerville From: David E. Nyberg, P.E. Subject: SHORELAND ORDINANCE REVISIONS FROM JULY 29, 1998 WORKSHOP File: 260081 M -0025 Date: August 21, 1998 Attached to this memo, please find a copy of the revised Shoreland Ordinance, dated August 21, 1998. We have included revisions to the document in accordance with a discussion at the July 29, 1998 workshop, a joint meeting between the Planning and Zoning Committee and the City Council. Listed below is a summary of changes to the Shoreland Ordinance. • Section 5.14, Part B, Item 1 The building setback has been changed from 50 feet to 75 feet from the ordinary high water level, • Section 5.14, Part C, Item 2 The maximum allowable height for a guest cottage has been changed from 15 feet to 35 feet. • Section 5.23 The maximum allowable height of structures has been changed from 25 feet to 35 feet. We will be in attendance at the August 21 special meeting to discuss the Shoreland Ordinance with both the Planning and Zoning Committee and the City Council. It is our recommendation that the City Attorney also be consulted on this ordinance, especially with regard to granting variances or allowing reconstruction within Shoreland zones. DEN /st Enclosures cc: Mr. Paul Palzer, Centerville Public Works Mr. Jim Hoeft, Barna, Guzy, and Steffen 0: PR0J\260061m \081- 2101aug.doc 1326 Energy Park Drive • St. Paul, MN 55108 • 612/644 -4389 fax 612/644 -9446 toll free 888/368 -4389 DRAFT Revised August 21, 1998 CITY OF CENTERVILLE SHORELAND ORDINANCE terville Established 1857 Adopted ' 1998 SV10- 260.081 260- 081 -10 DRAFT Revised August 21, 1998 SAMPLE SHORELAND MANAGEMENT ORDINANCE TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION PAGE SECTION 1.0 - STATUTORY AUTHORIZATION AND POLICY .......................... 1 1.1 Statutory Authorization ........................ ............................... 1 1.2 Policy ............................................. ............................... i SECTION 2.0 - GENERAL PROVISIONS AND DEFINITIONS ............................. 1 2.1 Jurisdiction ...................................... ............................... 1 2.2 Compliance ...................................... ............................... 1 2.3 Enforcement ..................................... ............................... 2 2.4 Interpretation .................................... ............................... 2 2.5 Severability ....................................... ..............................2 2.6 Abrogation and Greater Restrictions ........ ............................... 2 2.7 Definitions ....................................... ............................... 2 SECTION 3.0 - ADMINISTRATION ................................. ............................... 8 3.1 Permits Required .............................. ............................... 8 3.2 Certificates of Zoning Compliance ......... ............................... 8 3.3 Variances ........................................ ............................... 8 3.4 Notifications to DNR ........................ ............................... 8 SECTION 4.0 - SHORELAND CLASSIFICATIONS AND LAND USE DISTRICTS..... 9 4.1 Shoreland Classification System ............. ............................... 9 4.2 Land Use District Descriptions ............... .............................10 SECTION 5.0 - ZONING AND WATER SUPPLY /SANITARY PROVISIONS ........... 15 5.1 Lot Area and Width Standards ................ .............................15 5.2 Placement, Design, and Height of Structures ......................... 18 5.3 Shoreland Alterations ........................ ............................... 22 5.4 Placement and Design of Roads, Driveways, and Parking Areas ........................ ............................... 25 5.5 Stormwater Management ....................... .............................25 5.6 Special Provisions for Commercial, Industrial, Public/ Semipublic, Agricultural, Forestry and Extractive Uses and Mining of Metallic Minerals and Peat ..........................26 5.7 Conditional Uses ................................ .............................28 SMO- 260.081 - 1 - 260- 081 -10 DRAFT Revised August 21, 1998 5.8 Water Supply and Sewage Treatment ........ .............................29 SECTION 6.0 - NONCONFORMITIES ............................. ............................... 30 6.1 Construction on Nonconforming Lots of Record ....................... 30 6.2 Additions /Expansions to Nonconforming Structures ...................31 6.3 Nonconforming Sewage Treatment Systems ............................ 31 SECTION 7.0 - SUBDIVISION /PLATTING PROVISIONS ...... .............................32 SECTION 8.0 - PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENTS .......... ............................... 33 8.1 Types of PUD's Permissible ................ ............................... 33 8.2 Processing of PUD' s ............................ .............................33 8.3 Application for a PUD ....................... ............................... 33 8.4 Site "Suitable Area" Evaluation .............. .............................34 8.5 Residential and Commercial PUD Density Evaluation ................ 35 8.6 Maintenance and Design Criteria ............. .............................37 8.7 Conversions ...................................... .............................40 APPENDICES APPENDIX A - ORDINANCE CERTIFICATION CHECKLIST SMO- 260.081 260- 081 -10 DRAFT Revised August 21, 1998 SAMPLE SHORELAND MANAGEMENT ORDINANCE SECTION 1.0 - STATUTORY AUTHORIZATION AND POLICY 1.1 Statutory Authorization This shoreland ordinance is adopted pursuant to the authorization and policies contained in Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 103F, Minnesota Regulations, Parts 6120.2500 - 6120.3900, and the planning and zoning enabling legislation in Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 394 (for counties) or Chapter 462 (for municipalities). 1.2 Policy The uncontrolled use of shorelands of the City of Centerville, Minnesota affects the public health, safety and general welfare not only by contributing to pollution of public waters, but also by impairing the local tax base. Therefore, it is in the best interests of the public health, safety and welfare to provide for the wise subdivision, use and development of shorelands of public waters. The Legislature of Minnesota has delegated responsibility to local governments of the state to regulate the subdivision, use and development of the shorelands of public waters and thus preserve and enhance the quality of surface waters, conserve the economic and natural environmental values of shorelands, and provide for the wise use of waters and related land resources. This responsibility is hereby recognized by the City of Centerville. SECTION 2.0 - GENERAL PROVISIONS AND DEFINITIONS 2.1 Jurisdiction The provisions of this ordinance shall apply to the shorelands of the public water bodies as classified in Section 4.0 of this ordinance. Pursuant to Minnesota Regulations, Parts 6120.2500 - 6120.3900, no lake, pond, or flowage less than 10 acres in size in municipalities or 25 acres in size in unincorporated areas need be regulated in a local government's shoreland regulations. A body of water created by a private user where there was no previous shoreland may, at the discretion of the governing body, be exempt from this ordinance. 2.2 Compliance The use of any shoreland of public waters; the size and shape of lots; the use, size, type and location of structures on lots; the installation and maintenance of water supply and waste treatment systems, the grading and filling of any shoreland area; the cutting of shoreland vegetation; and the subdivision of land shall be in full compliance with the terms of this ordinance and other applicable regulations. SMO- 260.081 _ 1 260- 081 -10 DRAFT Revised August 21, 1998 2.3 Enforcement The City of Centerville is responsible for the administration and enforcement of this ordinance. Any violation of the provisions of this ordinance or failure to comply with any of its requirements (including violations of conditions and safeguards established in connection with grants of variances or conditional uses) shall constitute a misdemeanor and shall be punishable as defined by law. Violations of this ordinance can occur regardless of whether or not a permit is required for a regulated activity pursuant to Section 3.1 of this ordinance. 2.4 Interpretation In their interpretation and application, the provisions of this ordinance shall be held to be minimum requirements and shall be liberally construed in favor of the governing body and shall not be deemed a limitation or repeal of any other powers granted by State Statutes. 2.5 Severability If any section, clause, provision, or portion of this ordinance is adjudged unconstitutional or invalid by a court of competent jurisdiction, the remainder of this ordinance shall not be affected thereby. 2.6 Abrogation and Greater Restrictions It is not intended by this ordinance to repeal, abrogate, or impair any existing easements, covenants, or deed restrictions. However, where this ordinance imposes greater restrictions, the provisions of this ordinance shall prevail. All other ordinances inconsistent with this ordinance are hereby repealed to the extent of the inconsistency only. 2.7 Definitions Unless specifically defined below, words or phrases used in this ordinance shall be interpreted so as to give them the same meaning as they have in common usage and so as to give this ordinance its most reasonable application. For the purpose of this ordinance, the words "must" and "shall" are mandatory and not permissive. All distances, unless otherwise specified, shall be measured horizontally. 2.711 Accessory structure or facility. "Accessory structure" or "facility" means any building or improvement subordinate to a principal use which, because of the nature of its use, can reasonably be located at or greater than normal structure setbacks. 2.712 Bluff. 'Bluff' means a topographic feature such as a hill, cliff, or embankment having the following characteristics (an area with an average slope of less than 18 percent over a distance for 50 feet or more shall not be considered part of the bluff): SMO- 260.081 - z - 260 - 081 -10 DRAFT Revised August 21, 1998 (1) Part or all of the feature is located in a shoreland area; (2) The slope rises at least 25 feet above the ordinary high water level of the waterbody; (3) The grade of the slope from the toe of the bluff to a point 25 feet or more above the ordinary high water level averages 30 percent or greater; and (4) The slope must drain toward the waterbody. 2.713 Bluff impact zone. 'Bluff impact zone" means a bluff and land located within 20 feet from the top of a bluff. 2.714 Boathouse. 'Boathouse" means a structure designed and used solely for the storage of boats or boating equipment. 2.715 Building line. 'Building line" means a line parallel to a lot line or the ordinary high water level at the required setback beyond which a structure may not extend. 2.716 Commercial planned unit developments. "Commercial planned unit developments" are typically uses that provide transient, short-term lodging spaces, rooms, or parcels and their operations are essentially service - oriented. For example, hotel /motel accommodations, resorts, recreational vehicle and camping parks, and other primarily service -orien ed activities are commercial planned unit developments. 2.717 Commercial use. "Commercial use" means the principal use of land or buildings for the sale, lease, rental, or trade of products, goods, and services. 2.718 Commissioner. "Commissioner" means the commissioner of the Department of Natural Resources. 2.719 Conditional use. "Conditional use" means a land use or development as defined by ordinance that would not be appropriate generally but may be allowed with appropriate restrictions as provided by official controls upon a finding that certain conditions as detailed in the zoning ordinance exist, the use or development conforms to the comprehensive land use plan of the community, and the use is compatible with the existing neighborhood. 2.720 Deck. "Deck" means a horizontal, unenclosed platform with or without attached railings, seats, trellises, or other features, attached or functionally related to a principal use or site and at any point extending more than three feet above ground. 2.721 Duplex, triplex, and quad. "Duplex," triplex," and "quad" means a dwelling structure on a single lot, having two, three, and four units, respectively, being attached by common walls and each unit equipped with separate sleeping, cooking, eating, living, and sanitation facilities. sMO- 260.081 -3- 260 4)81 -10 DRAFT Revised August 21, 1998 2.722 Dwelling site. 'Dwelling site" means a designated location for residential use by one or more persons using temporary or movable shelter, including camping and recreational vehicle sites. 2.723 Dwelling unit. "Dwelling unit" means any structure or portion of a structure, or other shelter designed as short- or long -term living quarters for one or more persons, including rental or timeshare accommodations such as motel, hotel, and resort rooms and cabins. 2.724 Extractive use. "Extractive use" means the use of land for surface or subsurface removal of sand, gravel, rock, industrial minerals, other nonmetallic minerals, and peat not regulated under Minnesota Statutes, sections 93.44 to 93.51. 2.725 Forest land conversion. "Forest land conversion" means the clear cutting of forested lands to prepare for a new land use other than reestablishment of a subsequent forest stand. 2.726 Guest cottage. "Guest cottage" means a structure used as a dwelling unit that may contain sleeping spaces and kitchen and bathroom facilities in addition to those provided in the primary dwelling unit on a lot. 2.727 Hardship. "Hardship" means the same as that term is defined in Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 394 (for counties) or Chapter 462 (for municipalities). 2.728 Height of building. "Height of building" means the vertical distance between the highest adjoining ground level at the building or ten feet above the lowest ground level, whichever is lower, and the highest point of a flat roof or average height of the highest gable of a pitched or hipped roof. 2.729 Industrial use. "Industrial use" means the use of land or buildings for the production, manufacture, warehousing, storage, or transfer of goods, products, commodities, or other wholesale items. 2.730 Intensive vegetation clearing. "Intensive vegetation clearing" means the complete removal of trees or shrubs in a contiguous patch, strip, row, or block. 2.731 Lot. "Lot" means a parcel of land designated by plat, metes and bounds, registered land survey, auditors plot, or other accepted means and separated from other parcels or portions by said description for the purpose of sale, lease, or separation. 2.732 Lot width. "Lot width" means the shortest distance between lot lines measured at the midpoint of the building line. 2.733 Nonconformity. "Nonconformity" means any legal use, structure or parcel of land already in existence, recorded, or authorized before the adoption of official controls or amendments thereto that would not have been permitted to become established SMO- 260.081 -4_ 260 - 081 -10 DRAFT Revised August 21, 1998 under the terms of the official controls as now written, if the official controls had been in effect prior to the date it was established, recorded or authorized. 2.734 Ordinary high water level. "Ordinary high water level" means the boundary of public waters and wetlands, and shall be an elevation delineating the highest water level which has been maintained for a sufficient period of time to leave evidence upon the landscape, commonly that point where the natural vegetation changes from predominantly aquatic to predominantly terrestrial. For watercourses, the ordinary high water level is the elevation of the top of the bank of the channel. For reservoirs and flowages, the ordinary high water level is the operating elevation of the normal summer pool. 2.735 Planned unit development. "Planned unit development" means a type of development characterized by a unified site design for a number of dwelling units or dwelling sites on a parcel, whether for sale, rent, or lease, and also usually involving clustering of these units or sites to provide areas of common open space, density increases, and a mix of structure types and land uses. These developments may be organized and operated as condominiums, time -share condominiums, cooperatives, full fee ownership, commercial enterprises, or any combination of these, or cluster subdivisions of dwelling units, residential condominiums, townhouses, apartment buildings, campgrounds, recreational vehicle parks, resorts, hotels, motels, and conversions of structures and land uses to these uses. 2.736 Public waters. 'Public waters" ears any waters as defined in Minnesota Statutes, section 103G.005, subdivisions 15 and 15a. 2.737 Residential planned unit development. "Residential planned unit development" means a use where the nature of residency is non - transient and the major or primary focus of the development is not service - oriented. For example, residential apartments, manufactured home parks, time -share condominiums, townhouses, cooperatives, and full fee ownership residences would be considered as residential planned unit developments. To qualify as a residential planned unit development, a development must contain at least five dwelling units or sites. 2.738 Semipublic use. "Semipublic use" means the use of land by a private, nonprofit organization to provide a public service that is ordinarily open to some persons outside the regular constituency of the organization. 2.739 Sensitive resource management. "Sensitive resource management" means the preservation and management of areas unsuitable for development in their natural state due to constraints such as shallow soils over groundwater or bedrock, highly erosive or expansive soils, steep slopes, susceptibility to flooding, or occurrence of flora or fauna in need of special protection. 2.740 Setback. "Setback" means the minimum horizontal distance between a structure, sewage treatment system, or other facility and an ordinary high water level, sewage treatment system, top of a bluff, road, highway, property line, or other facility. SMO- 260.081 5 260- 081 -10 DRAFT Revised August 21, 1998 2.741 Sewage treatment system. "Sewage treatment system" means a septic tank and soil absorption system or other individual or cluster type sewage treatment system as described and regulated in Section 5.8 of this ordinance. 2.742 Sewer system. "Sewer system" means pipelines or conduits, pumping stations, and force main, and all other construction, devices, appliances, or appurtenances used for conducting sewage or industrial waste or other wastes to a point of ultimate disposal. 2.743 Shore impact zone. "Shore impact zone" means land located between the ordinary high water level of a public water and a line parallel to it at a setback of 50 percent of the structure setback. 2.744 Shoreland. "Shoreland" means land located within the following distances from public waters: 1,000 feet from the ordinary high water level of a lake, pond, or flowage; and 50 feet from a river or stream, or the landward extent of a floodplain designated by ordinance on a river or stream, whichever is greater. The limits of shorelands may be reduced whenever the waters involved are bounded by topographic divides which extend landward from the waters for lesser distances and when approved by the commissioner. 2.745 Significant historic site. "Significant historic site" means any archaeological site, standing structure, or other pro erty that meets the criteria for eligibility to the National Register of Historic Places or is listed in the State Register of Historic Sites, or is determined to be an unplatted cemetery that falls under the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, section 307.08. A historic site meets these criteria if it is presently listed on either register or if it is determined to meet the qualifications for listing after review by the Minnesota state archaeologist or the director of the Minnesota Historical Society. All unplatted cemeteries are automatically considered to be significant historic sites. 2.746 Steep slope. "Steep slope" means land where agricultural activity or development is either not recommended or described as poorly suited due to slope steepness and the site's soil characteristics, as mapped and described in available county soil surveys or other technical reports, unless appropriate design and construction techniques and farming practices are used in accordance with the provisions of this ordinance. Where specific information is not available, steep slopes are lands having average slopes over 12 percent, as measured over horizontal distances of 50 feet or more, that are not bluffs. 2.747 Structure. "Structure" means any building or appurtenance, including decks, except aerial or underground utility lines, such as sewer, electric, telephone, telegraph, gas lines, towers, poles, and other supporting facilities. 2.748 Subdivision. "Subdivision" means land that is divided for the purpose of sale, rent, or lease, including planned unit developments. SMO- 260.081 - 6 - 260 - 081 -10 DRAFT Revised August 21, 1998 2.749 Surface water- oriented commercial use. "Surface water - oriented commercial use" means the use of land for commercial purposes, where access to and use of a surface water feature is an integral part of the normal conductance of business. Marinas, resorts, and restaurants with transient docking facilities are examples of such use. 2.750 Toe of the bluff. "Toe of the bluff" means the lower point of a 50 -foot segment with an average slope exceeding 18 percent. 2.751 Top of the bluff. "Top of the bluff' means the higher point of a 50 -foot segment with an average slope exceeding 18 percent. 2.752 Variance. "Variance" means the same as that term is defined or described in Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 394 (for counties) or Chapter 462 (for municipalities). 2.753 Water - oriented accessory structure or facility. "Water- oriented accessory structure or facility" means a small, above ground building or other improvement, except stairways, fences, docks, and retaining walls, which, because of the relationship of its use to a surface water feature, reasonably needs to be located closer to public waters than the normal structure setback. Examples of such structures and facilities include boathouses, gazebos, screen houses, fish houses, pump houses, and detached decks. 2.754 Wetland. "Wetland" means a surface water feature classified as a wetland in the United States Fish and Wildlife Service Circular No. 39 (1971 edition). SECTION 3.0 - ADMINISTRATION 3.1 Permits Required 3.11 A permit is required for the construction of buildings or building additions (and including such related activities as construction of decks and signs), the installation and /or alteration of sewage treatment systems, and those grading and filling activities not exempted by Section 5.3 of this ordinance. Application for a permit shall be made to the City of Centerville Building Inspector on the forms provided. The application shall include the necessary information so that the City of Centerville Building Inspector can determine the site's suitability for the intended use and that a compliant sewage treatment system will be provided. 3.12 A permit authorizing an addition to an existing structure shall stipulate that an identified nonconforming sewage treatment system, as defined by Section 5.8, shall be reconstructed or replaced in accordance with the provisions of this ordinance. SMO- 260.081 7 260 -081 -10 DRAFT Revised August 21, 1998 3.2 Certificate of Zoning Compliance The Building Inspector shall issue a certificate of zoning compliance for each activity requiring a permit as specified in Section 3.1 of this ordinance. This certificate will specify that the use of land conforms to the requirements of this ordinance. Any use, arrangement, or construction at variance with that authorized by permit shall be deemed a violation of this ordinance and shall be punishable as provided in Section 2.3 of this ordinance. 3.3 Variances 3.31 Variances may only be granted in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 394 (for counties) or 462 (for municipalities), as applicable. A variance may not circumvent the general purposes and intent of this ordinance. No variance may be granted that would allow any use that is prohibited in the zoning district in which the subject property is located. Conditions may be imposed in the granting of a variance to ensure compliance and to protect adjacent properties and the public interest. In considering a variance request, the board of adjustment must also consider whether the property owner has reasonable use of the land without the variance, whether the property is used seasonally or year- round, whether the variance is being requested solely on the basis of economic considerations, and the characteristics of development on adjacent properties. 3.32 The board of adjustment shall hear and decide requests for variances in accordance with the rules that it has adopted for the conduct of business. When a variance is approved after the Department of Natural Resources has formally recommended denial in the hearing record, the notification of the approved variance required in Section 3.42 below shall also include the board of adjustment's summary of the public record /testimony and the findings of facts and conclusions which supported the issuance of the variance. 3.33 For existing developments, the application for variance must clearly demonstrate whether a conforming sewage treatment system is present for the intended use of the property. The variance, if issued, must require reconstruction of a nonconforming sewage treatment system. 3.4 Notifications to the Department of Natural Resources 3.41 Copies of all notices of any public hearings to consider variances, amendments, or conditional uses under local shoreland management controls must be sent to the commissioner or the commissioner's designated representative and postmarked at least ten days before the hearings. Notices of hearings to consider proposed subdivisions /plats must include copies of the subdivision/plat. 3.42 A copy of approved amendments and subdivisions /plats, and final decisions granting variances or conditional uses under local shoreland management controls must be sent to the commissioner or the commissioner's designated representative SMO- 260.081 _ 8 - 260 - 081 -10 DRAFT Revised August 21, 1998 and postmarked within ten days of final action. SECTION 4.0 - SIIORELAND CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM AND LAND USE DISTRICTS 4.1 Shoreland Classification System The public waters of the City of Centerville have been classified below consistent with the criteria found in Minnesota Regulations, Part 6120.3300, and the Protected Waters Inventory Map for Anoka County, Minnesota. 4.11 The shoreland area for the waterbodies listed in sections 4.12 and 4.13 shall be as defined in section 2.744 and as shown on the Official Zoning Map. 4.12 Lakes Protected Waters A. Natural Environment Lakes Inventory I.D.# Peltier Lake 4P Protected Waters B. Recreational Development Lakes Inventory I.D.# Centerville Lake 6P Protected Waters C. General Development Lakes Inventory I.D.# None -- 4.13 Rivers and Streams A. Remote Rivers None B. Forested Rivers None C. Transition Rivers None D. Agricultural Rivers None E. Urban Rivers None F. Tributary Streams Clearwater Creek See map *All protected watercourses in the City of Centerville shown on the Protected Waters Inventory Map for Anoka County, a copy of which is hereby adopted by reference, not given a classification in Items A -E above shall be considered "Tributary ". SMO- 260.081 9 260- 081 -10 DRAFT Revised August 21, 1998 4.2 Land Use District Descriptions 4.21 Criteria For Designation. The land use districts in Section 4.22, and the delineation of a land use district's boundaries on the Official Zoning Map, must be consistent with the goals, policies, and objectives of the comprehensive land use plan (when available) and the following criteria, considerations, and objectives: A. General Considerations and Criteria for All Land Uses: (1) preservation of natural areas; (2) present ownership and development of shoreland areas; (3) shoreland soil types and their engineering capabilities; (4) topographic characteristics; (5) vegetative cover; (6) in -water physical characteristics, values, and constraints; (7) recreational use of the surface water; (8) road and service enter accessibility; (9) socioeconomic development needs and plans as they involve water and related land resources; (10) the land requirements of industry which, by its nature, requires location in shoreland areas; and (11) the necessity to preserve and restore certain areas having significant historical or ecological value. B. Factors and Criteria for Planned Unit Developments: (1) existing recreational use of the surface wates and likely increases in use associated with planned unit developments; (2) physical and aesthetic impacts of increased density; (3) suitability of lands for the planned unit development approach; (4) level of current development in the area; and (5) amounts and types of ownership of undeveloped lands. SMO- 260.081 _10- 260- 081 -10 DRAFT Revised August 21, 1998 4.22 Land Use District Descriptions. The land use districts provided below, and the allowable land uses therein for the given classifications of waterbodies, shall be properly delineated on the Official Zoning Map for the shorelands of this community. These land use districts are in conformance with the criteria specified in Minnesota Regulation, Part 6120.3200, Subp. 3: (Note: Include either the following tables of land use districts by classification, modified tables meeting state standards or a reference to an existing ordinance with land use descriptions meeting state standards.) A. Land Use Districts For Lakes (P = permitted, C = conditional) General Recreational Natural Development Development Environment Lakes Lakes Lakes (Centerville Lake) (Peltier Lake) (1) Special Protection District - Uses - Forest management P P P - Sensitive resource management P P P - Agricultural: cropland and pasture P P P - Agricultural feedlots C C C -Parks and historic sites C C C - Extractive use C C C - Single residential C C C - Mining of metallic minerals and peat P P P (2) Residential District - Uses - Single residential P P P - Semipublic C C C -Parks & historic sites C C C - Extractive use C C C - Duplex, triplex, quad residential P P C - Forest management P P P - Mining of metallic minerals and peat P P P (3) High Density Residential District - Uses - Residential planned unit developments C C C - Single residential P P P SMO- 260.081 _11- 260 - 081 -I0 DRAFT Revised August 21, 1998 - Surface water oriented commercial* C C C - Semipublic C C C -Parks & historic sites C C C - Duplex, triplex, quad residential P P P - Forest management P P P (4) Water Oriented Commercial District - Uses - Surface water- oriented commercial P P C - Commercial planned unit development ** C C C - Public, semipublic C C C -Parks & historic sites C C C - Forest management P P P *As accessory to a residential planned unit development * *Limited expansion of a commercial planned unit development involving up to six additional dwelling units or sites may be allowed as a permitted use provided the provisions of Section 8.0 of this ordinance are satisfied. (5) General Use District - Uses - Commercial P P C - Commercial planned unit development ** C C C - Industrial C C N - Public, semipublic P P C - Extractive use C C C -Parks & historic sites C C C - Forest management P P P - Mining of metallic minerals and peat P P P B. Land Use Districts for Rivers and Streams Re- For- Trans- Agri- Ur- Tribu- mote ested ition cultural ban tary (Clearwater Creek) (1) Special Protection District - Uses - Forest management P P P P P P - Sensitive resource management P P P P P P - Agricultural: cropland and pasture P P P P P P SMO- 260.081 -12- 260- 081 -10 DRAFT Revised August 21, 1998 - Agricultural feedlots C C C C C C -Parks and historic sites C C C C C C - Extractive use C C C C C C - Single residential C C C C C C - Mining of metallic minerals and peat P P P P P P (2) Residential District - Uses - Single residential P P P P P P - Semipublic C C C C C P -Parks and historic sites C C C C C P - Extractive use C C C C C C - Duplex, triplex, quad residential C C C C P C - Forest management P P P P P P - Mining of metallic minerals and peat P P P P P P *As accessory to a residential planned unit development * *Limited expansion of a commercial planned unit development involving up to six additional dwelling units or sites may be allowed as a permitted use provided the provisions of Section 8.0 of this ordinance are satisfied. (3) High Density Residential- Uses - Residential planned unit developments C C C C C C - Single residential P P P P P P - Surface water oriented commercial* C C C C C C - Semipublic C C C C C C -Parks and historic sites C C C C C C - Duplex, triplex, quad residential P P P P P P - Forest management P P P P P P (4) Water- oriented Commercial- Uses - Surface water- oriented commercial C C C C C C - Commercial planned unit development* C C C C C C - Public, semipublic C C C P P P -Parks and historic sites C C C C C C - Forest management P P P P P P SMO- 260.081 13 260- 081 -10 DRAFT Revised August 21, 1998 (5) General Use District - Uses - Commerical C C C C P C - Commercial planned unit development" C C C C C C - Industrial N C N N C C - Public, semipublic C C C C P C - Extractive use C C C C C C -Parks and historic sites C C C C C C - Forest management P P P P P P - Mining of metallic minerals and peat P P P P P P *As accessory to a residential planned unit development * *Limited expansion of a commercial planned unit development involving up to six additional dwelling units or sites may be allowed as a permitted use provided the provisions of Section 8.0 of this ordinance are satisfied. 4.23 Use and Upgrading of Inconsistent Land Use Districts. A. The land use districts adopted in Ordinance Number , Section as they apply to shoreland areas, and their delineated boundaries on the Official Zoning Map, are not consistent with the land use district designation criteria specified in Section 4.22 herein. These inconsistent land use district designations may continue until revisions are proposed to change either the land use district designation within an existing land use district boundary shown on the Official Zoning Map or to modify the boundary of an existing land use district shown on the Official Zoning Map. B. When a revision is proposed to an inconsistent land use district provision, the following additional criteria and procedures shall apply: (1) For Lakes. When a revision to a land use district designation on a lake is considered, the land use district boundaries and use provisions therein for all the shoreland areas within the jurisdiction of this ordinance on said lake must be revised to make them substantially compatible with the framework in Sections 4.21 and 4.22 of this ordinance. (2) For Rivers and Streams. When a revision to a land use district designation on a river or stream is proposed, the land use district boundaries and the use provisions therein for all shoreland on both sides of the river or stream within the same classification within the jurisdiction of this ordinance must be revised to make them substantially compatible with the framework in Sections 4.21 and 4.22 of this ordinance. If the same river classification is contiguous for more than a five -mile segment, only the shoreland for a distance sMO- 260.081 -14- 260 - 081 -10 DRAFT Revised August 21, 1998 of 2.5 miles upstream and downstream, or to the class boundary if closer, need be evaluated and revised. C. When an interpretation question arises about whether a specific land use fits within a given "use" category, the interpretation shall be made by the Board of Adjustment. When a question arises as to whether a land use district's boundaries are properly delineated on the Official Zoning Map, this decision shall be made by the City of Centerville. D. When a revision is proposed to an inconsistent land use district provision by an individual parry or landowner, this individual party or landowner will only be responsible to provide the supporting and /or substantiating information for the specific parcel in question. The City of Centervillewill direct the Building Inspector to provide such additional information for this waterbody as is necessary to satisfy Items A and B. E. The City of Centerville must make a detailed finding of fact and conclusion when taking final action that this revision, and the upgrading of any inconsistent land use district designations on said waterbody, are consistent with the enumerated criteria and use provisions of Section 4.2. SECTION 5.0 - ZONING AND WATER SUPPLY /SANITARY PROVISIONS 5.1 Lot Area and Width Standards. The lot area (in square feet) and lot width standards (in feet) for single, duplex, triplex and quad residential lots created after the date of enactment of this ordinance for the lake and river /stream classifications are the following: 5.11 Unsewered Lakes A. No new construction will be allowed within the shoreland zones without sewer systems. 5.12 Sewered Lakes: A. Natural Environment (Peltier Lake): Riparian Lots Nonriparian Lots Area Width Area Width Single 11,500 80 11,500 80 SMO- 260.081 15 260 -081 -10 DRAFT Revised August 21, 1998 B. Recreational Development (Centerville Lake): Riparian Lots Nonriparian Lots Area Width Area Width Single 11,500 80 11,500 80 C. General Development: Riparian Lots Nonriparian Lots Area Width Area Width Single 11,500 80 11,500 80 5.13 River /Stream Lot Width Standards. There is no minimum lot size requirements for rivers and streams. The lot width standards for single, duplex, triplex, and quad residential developments for the six river /stream classifications are: Re- For- Trans- Agri- Urban & mote ested ition cultural Tributary No Sewer Sewer Single 80 80 80 80 80 80 5.14 Additional Special Provisions. A. Residential subdivisions with dwelling unit densities exceeding those in the tables in Sections 5.12 and 5.13 can only be allowed if designed and approved as residential planned unit developments under Section 8.0 of this ordinance. Only land above the ordinary high water level of public waters can be used to meet lot area standards, and lot width standards must be met at both the ordinary high water level and at the building line. The sewer lot area dimensions in Section 5.12 can only be used if publicly owned sewer system service is available to the property. B. Subdivisions of duplexes, triplexes, and quads on Natural Environment Lakes must also meet the following standards: (1) each building must be set back at least 75 feet from the ordinary high water level; (2) each building must be connected to the City sewer system; (3) watercraft docking facilities for each lot must be centralized in one location and serve all dwelling units in the building; and (4) no more than 25 percent of a lake's shoreline can be in duplex, SMO- 260.081 16 260 - 081 -10 DRAFT Revised August 21, 1998 triplex, or quad developments. C. One guest cottage may be allowed on lots meeting or exceeding the duplex lot area and width dimensions presented in Sections 5.11 -5.13, provided the following standards are met: (1) for lots exceeding the minimum lot dimensions of duplex lots, the guest cottage must be located within the smallest duplex -sized lot that could be created including the principal dwelling unit; (2) a guest cottage must not cover more than 700 square feet of land surface and must not exceed 35 feet in height; and (3) a guest cottage must be located or designed to reduce its visibility as viewed from public waters and adjacent shorelands by vegetation, topography, increased setbacks or color, assuming summer leaf -on conditions. D. Lots intended as controlled accesses to public waters or as recreation areas for use by owners of nonriparian lots within subdivisions are permissible and must meet or exceed the following standards: (1) they must meet the width and size requirements for residential lots, and be suitable for the intended uses of controlled access lots. (2) If docking, mooring, or over -water storage of more than six (6) watercraft is to be allowed at a controlled access lot, then the width of the lot (keeping the same lot depth) must be increased by the percent of the requirements for riparian residential lots for each watercraft beyond six, consistent with the following table: Controlled Access Lot Frontage Requirements Ratio of lake size Required increase to shore length in frontage (acres /mile) (percent) Less than 100 25 100 -200 20 201 -300 15 301 -400 10 Greater than 400 5 sMO- 260.081 -17- 260 -081 d0 DRAFT Revised August 21, 1998 (3) they must be jointly owned by all purchasers of lots in the subdivision or by all purchasers of nonriparian lots in the subdivision who are provided riparian access rights on the access lot; and (4) covenants or other equally effective legal instruments must be developed that specify which lot owners have authority to use the access lot and what activities are allowed. The activities may include watercraft launching, loading, storage, beaching, mooring, or docking. They must also include other outdoor recreational activities that do not significantly conflict with general public use of the public water or the enjoyment of normal property rights by adjacent property owners. Examples of the insignificant conflict activities include swimming, sunbathing, or picnicking. The covenants must limit the total number of vehicles allowed to be parked and the total number of watercraft allowed to be continuously moored, docked, or stored over water, and must require centralization of all common facilities and activities in the most suitable locations on the lot to minimize topographic and vegetation alterations. They must also require all parking areas, storage buildings, and other facilities to be screened by vegetation or topography as much as practical from view from the public water, assuming summer, leaf -on conditions. 5.2 Placement, Design, and Height of Structures. 5.21 Placement of Structures on Lots. When more than one setback applies to a site, structures and facilities must be located to meet all setbacks. Where structures exist on the adjoining lots on both sides of a proposed building site, structure setbacks may be altered without a variance to conform to the adjoining setbacks from the ordinary high water level, provided the proposed building site is not located in a shore impact zone or in a bluff impact zone. Structures shall be located as follows. A. Structure Setbacks (in feet) from Ordinary High Water Level *. Setbacks* Classes of Structures Public Waters Unsewered Sewered Lakes Natural Environment 50 50 Recreational Development 50 50 General Development 50 50 SMO- 260.081 -18 260 - 081 -10 DRAFT Revised August 21, 1998 Rivers Remote 50 50 Forested and Transition 50 50 Agriculture, Urban, and Tributary 50 50 *One water - oriented accessory structure designed in accordance with Section 5.22 of this ordinance may be set back a minimum distance of ten (10) feet from the ordinary high water level. ** Distance between structures and property line, not OHW. B. Additional Structure Setbacks. The following additional structure setbacks apply, regardless of the classification of the waterbody: Setback From: Setback (in feet) (1) top of bluff, 30 (2) unplatted cemetery; 54 (3) right -of -way line of 50 federal, state, or county highway; and (4) right -of -way line of 20 town road, public street, or other roads or streets not classified. C. Bluff Impact Zones. Structures and accessory facilities, except stairways and landings, must not be placed within bluff impact zones. D. Uses Without Water - oriented Needs. Uses without water- oriented needs must be located on lots or parcels without public waters frontage, or, if located on lots or parcels with public waters frontage, must either be set back double the normal ordinary high water level setback or be substantially screened from view from the water by vegetation or topography, assuming summer, leaf -on conditions. 5.22 Design Criteria For Structures. A. High Water Elevations. Structures must be placed in accordance with any floodplain regulations applicable to the site. Where these controls do not exist, the elevation to which the lowest floor, including basement, is placed or flood - proofed must be determined as follows: (1) for lakes, by placing the lowest floor at a level at least three feet SMO- 260.081 -19 260 - 091 -10 DRAFT Revised August 21, 1998 above the highest known water level, or three feet above the ordinary high water level, whichever is higher; (2) for rivers and streams, by placing the lowest floor at least three feet above the flood of record, if data are available. If data are not available, by placing the lowest floor at least three feet above the ordinary high water level, or by conducting a technical evaluation to determine effects of proposed construction upon flood stages and flood flows and to establish a flood protection elevation. Under all three approaches, technical evaluations must be done by a qualified engineer or hydrologist consistent with parts 6120.5000 to 6120.6200 governing the management of flood plain areas. If more than one approach is used, the highest flood protection elevation determined must be used for placing structures and other facilities; and (3) water- oriented accessory structures may have the lowest floor placed lower than the elevation determined in this item if the structure is constructed of flood- resistant materials to the elevation, electrical and mechanical equipment is placed above the elevation and, if long duration flooding is anticipated, the structure is built to withstand ice action and wind - driven waves and debris. B. Water- oriented Accessory Structures. Each lot may have one water - oriented accessory structure not meeting the normal structure setback in Section 5.21 of this ordinance if this water - oriented accessory structure complies with the following provisions: (1) the structure or facility must not exceed ten feet in height, exclusive of safety rails, and cannot occupy an area greater than 250 square feet. Detached decks must not exceed eight feet above grade at any point; (2) the setback of the structure or facility from the ordinary high water level must be at least ten feet; (3) the structure or facility must be treated to reduce visibility as viewed from public waters and adjacent shorelands by vegetation, topography, increased setbacks or color, assuming summer, leaf -on conditions; (4) the roof may be used as a deck with safety rails, but must not be enclosed or used as a storage area; (5) the structure or facility must not be designed or used for human habitation and must not contain water supply or sewage treatment facilities; and SMO- 260.081 -20- 260- 081 -10 DRAFT Revised August 21, 1998 (6) as an alternative for general development and recreational development waterbodies, water- oriented accessory structures used solely for watercraft storage, and including storage of related boating and water - oriented sporting equipment, may occupy an area up to 400 square feet provided the maximum width of the structure is 20 feet as measured parallel to the configuration of the shoreline. C. Stairways, Lifts, and Landings. Stairways and lifts are the preferred alternative to major topographic alterations for achieving access up and down bluffs and steep slopes to shore areas. Stairways and lifts must meet the following design requirements: (1) stairways and lifts must not exceed four feet in width on residential lots. Wider stairways may be used for commercial properties, public open -space recreational properties, and planned unit developments; (2) landings for stairways and lifts on residential lots must not exceed 32 square feet in area. Landings larger than 32 square feet may be used for commercial properties, public open -space recreational properties, and planned unit developments; (3) canopies or roofs are not allowed on stairways, lifts, or landings; (4) stairways, lifts, and landings may be either constructed above the ground on posts or pilings, or placed into the ground, provided they are designed and built in a manner that ensures control of soil erosion; (5) stairways, lifts, and landings must be located in the most visually inconspicuous portions of lots, as viewed from the surface of the public water assuming summer, leaf -on conditions, whenever practical; and (6) facilities such as ramps, lifts, or mobility paths for physically handicapped persons are also allowed for achieving access to shore areas, provided that the dimensional and performance standards of subitems (1) to (5) are complied with in addition to the requirements of Minnesota Regulations, Chapter 1340. D. Significant Historic Sites. No structure may be placed on a significant historic site in a manner that affects the values of the site unless adequate information about the site has been removed and documented in a public repository. SMO- 260.081 21 260- 081 -10 DRAFT Revised August 21, 1998 E. Steep Slopes. The City of Centerville Building Inspector must evaluate possible soil erosion impacts and development visibility from public waters before issuing a permit for construction of sewage treatment systems, roads, driveways, structures, or other improvements on steep slopes. When determined necessary, conditions must be attached to issued permits to prevent erosion and to preserve existing vegetation screening of structures, vehicles, and other facilities as viewed from the surface of public waters, assuming summer, leaf -on vegetation. 5.23 Height of Structures. All structures in residential districts, except churches and nonresidential agricultural structures, must not exceed 35 feet in height. 5.3 Shoreland Alterations Alterations of vegetation and topography will be regulated to prevent erosion into public waters, fix nutrients, preserve shoreland aesthetics, preserve historic values, prevent bank slumping, and protect fish and wildlife habitat. 5.31 Vegetation Alterations, A. Vegetation alteration necessary for the construction of structures and sewage treatment systems and the construction of roads and parking areas regulated by Section 5.4 of this ordinance are exempt from the vegetation alteration standards that follow. B. Removal or alteration of vegetation, except for agricultural and forest management uses as regulated in Sections 5.62 and 5.63, respectfully, is allowed subject to the following standards: (1) Intensive vegetation clearing within the shore and bluff impact zones and on steep slopes is not allowed. Intensive vegetation clearing for forest land conversion to another use outside of these areas is allowable as a conditional use if an erosion control and sedimentation plan is developed and approved by the soil and water conservation district in which the property is located. (2) In shore and bluff impact zones and on steep slopes, limited clearing of trees and shrubs and cutting, pruning, and trimming of trees is allowed to provide a view to the water from the principal dwelling site and to accommodate the placement of stairways and landings, picnic areas, access paths, livestock watering areas, beach and watercraft access areas, and permitted water - oriented accessory structures or facilities, provided that: (a) the screening of structures, vehicles, or other facilities as viewed from the water, assuming summer, leaf -on conditions, is not substantially reduced; sMO- 260.08 t -22- 260 -08 t -10 DRAFT Revised August 21, 1998 (b) along rivers, existing shading of water surfaces is preserved; and (c) the above provisions are not applicable to the removal of trees, limbs, or branches that are dead, diseased, or pose safety hazards. 5.32 Topographic Alterations /Grading and Filling. A. Grading and filling and excavations necessary for the construction of structures, sewage treatment systems, and driveways under validly issued construction permits for these facilities do not require the issuance of a separate grading and filling permit. However, the grading and filling standards in this Section must be incorporated into the issuance of permits for construction of structures, sewage treatment systems, and driveways. B. Public roads and parking areas are regulated by Section 5.4 of this ordinance. C. Notwithstanding Items A. and B. above, a grading and filling permit will be required for: (1) the movement of ore than ten (10) cubic yards of material on steep slopes or within shore or bluff impact zones; and (2) the movement of more than 50 cubic yards of material outside of steep slopes and shore and bluff impact zones. D. The following considerations and conditions must be adhered to during the issuance of construction permits, grading and filling permits, conditional use permits, variances and subdivision approvals: (1) Grading or filling in any type 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, or 8 wetland must be evaluated to determine how extensively the proposed activity would affect the following functional qualities of the wetland *: (a) sediment and pollutant trapping and retention; (b) storage of surface runoff to prevent or reduce flood damage; (c) fish and wildlife habitat; (d) recreational use; (e) shoreline or bank stabilization; and sr10- 260.081 -23- 260- 081 -10 DRAFT Revised August 21, 1998 (f) noteworthiness, including special qualities such as historic signficance, critical habitat for endangered plants and animals, or others. *This evaluation must also include a determination of whether the wetland alteration being proposed requires permits, reviews, or approvals by other local, state, or federal agencies such as a watershed district, the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, or the United States Army Corps of Engineers. The applicant will be so advised. (2) Alterations must be designed and conducted in a manner that ensures only the smallest amount of bare ground is exposed for the shortest time possible; (3) Mulches or similar materials must be used, where necessary, for temporary bare soil coverage, and a permanent vegetation cover must be established as soon as possible; (4) Methods to minimi soil erosion and to trap sediments before they reach any surface water feature must be used; (5) Altered areas must be stabilized to acceptable erosion control standards consist nt with the field office technical guides of the local soil and water conservation districts and the United States Soil Conservation Service; (6) Fill or excavated material must not be placed in a manner that creates an unstable slope; (7) Plans to place fill or excavated material on steep slopes must be reviewed by qualified professionals for continued slope stability and must not create finished slopes of 30 percent or greater; (8) Fill or excavated material must not be placed in bluff impact zones; (9) Any alterations below the ordinary high water level of public waters must first be authorized by the commissioner under Minnesota Statutes, 103G.245; (10) Alterations of topography must only be allowed if they are accessory to permitted or conditional uses and do not adversely affect adjacent or nearby properties; and (11) Placement of natural rock riprap, including associated grading of the shoreline and placement of a filter blanket, is permitted if the finished slope does not exceed three feet horizontal to one foot SMO- 260.081 24 260- 081 -10 DRAFT Revised August 21, 1998 vertical, the landward extent of the riprap is within ten feet of the ordinary high water level, and the height of the riprap above the ordinary high water level does not exceed three feet. E. Connections to public waters. Excavations where the intended purpose is connection to public water, such as boat slips, canals, lagoons, and harbors, must be controlled by local shoreland controls. Permission for excavations may be given only after the commissioner has approved the proposed connection to public waters. 5.4 Placement and Design of Roads, Driveways, and Parking Areas. 5.41 Public and private roads and parking areas must be designed to take advantage of natural vegetation and topography to achieve maximum screening from view from public waters. Documentation must be provided by a qualified individual that all roads and parking areas are designed and constructed to minimize and control erosion to public waters consistent with the field office technical guides of the local soil and water conservation district, or other applicable technical materials. 5.42 Roads, driveways, and parking areas must meet structure setbacks and must not be placed within bluff and shore impact zones, when other reasonable and feasible placement alternatives exist. If no alternatives exist, they may be placed within these areas, and must be designed to minimize adverse impacts. 5.43 Public and private watercraft access ramps, approach roads, and access - related parking areas may be placed within shore impact zones provided the vegetative screening and erosion control conditions of this subpart are met. For private facilities, the grading and filling provisions of Section 5.32 of this ordinance must be met. 5.5 Stormwater Management. The following general and specific standards shall apply: 5.51 General Standards: A. When possible, existing natural drainageways, wetlands, and vegetated soil surfaces must be used to convey, store, filter, and retain stormwater runoff before discharge to public waters. B. Development must be planned and conducted in a manner that will minimize the extent of disturbed areas, runoff velocities, erosion potential, and reduce and delay runoff volumes. Disturbed areas must be stabilized and protected as soon as possible and facilities or methods used to retain sediment on the site. snto- 260.081 -25- 260- 081 -10 DRAFT Revised August 21, 1998 C. When development density, topographic features, and soil and vegetation conditions are not sufficient to adequately handle stormwater runoff using natural features and vegetation, various types of constructed facilities such as diversions, settling basins, skimming devices, dikes, waterways, and ponds may be used. Preference must be given to designs using surface drainage, vegetation, and infiltration rather than buried pipes and man -made materials and facilities. 5.52 Specific Standards: A. Impervious surface coverage of lots must not exceed 25 percent of the lot area. B. When constructed facilities are used for stormwater management, documentation must be provided by a qualified individual that they are designed and installed consistent with the field office technical guide of the local soil and water conservation districts. C. New constructed stormwater outfalls to public waters must provide for filtering or settling of suspended solids and skimming of surface debris before discharge. 5.6 Special Provisions for Commercial, Industrial, Public /Semipublic, Agricultural, Forestry and Extractive Uses and Mi 'ng of Metallic Minerals and Peat. 5.61 Standards for Commercial, Industrial, Public, and Semipublic Uses. A. Surface water - oriented commercial uses and industrial, public, or semipublic uses with similar needs to have access to and use of public waters may be located on parcels or lots with frontage on public waters. Those uses with water - oriented needs must meet the following standards: (1) in addition to meeting impervious coverage limits, setbacks, and other zoning standards in this ordinance, the uses must be designed to incorporate topographic and vegetative screening of parking areas and structures; (2) uses that require short -term watercraft mooring for patrons must centralize these facilities and design them to avoid obstructions of navigation and to be the minimum size necessary to meet the need; and (3) uses that depend on patrons arriving by watercraft may use signs and lighting to convey needed information to the public, subject to the following general standards: SMO- 260.081 26 260.081 -10 DRAFT' Revised August 21, 1998 (a) no advertising signs or supporting facilities for signs may be placed in or upon public waters. Signs conveying information or safety messages may be placed in or on public waters by a public authority or under a permit issued by the county sheriff; (b) signs may be placed, when necessary, within the shore impact zone if they are designed and sized to be the minimum necessary to convey needed information. They must only convey the location and name of the establishment and the general types of goods or services available. The signs must not contain other detailed information such as product brands and prices, must not be located higher than ten feet above the ground, and must not exceed 32 square feet in size. If illuminated by artificial lights, the lights must be shielded or directed to prevent illumination out across public waters; and (c) other outside lighting may be located within the shore impact zone or over public waters if it is used primarily to illuminate potential safety hazards and is shielded or otherwise directed to prevent direct illumination out across public waters. This does not preclude use of navigational lights. B. Uses without water - oriented needs must be located on lots or parcels without public waters frontage, or, if located on lots or parcels with public waters frontage, must either be set back double the normal ordinary high water level setback or be substantially screened from view from the water by vegetation or topography, assuming summer, leaf -on conditions. 5.62 Agriculture Use Standards. A. General cultivation farming, grazing, nurseries, horticulture, truck farming, sod farming, and wild crop harvesting are permitted uses if steep slopes and shore and bluff impact zones are maintained in permanent vegetation or operated under an approved conservation plan (Resource Management Systems) consistent with the field office technical guides of the local soil and water conservation districts or the United States Soil Conservation Service, as provided by a qualified individual or agency. The shore impact zone for parcels with permitted agricultural land uses is equal to a line parallel to and 50 feet from the ordinary high water level. B. Animal feedlots must meet the following standards: (1) new feedlots must not be located in the shoreland of watercourses or in bluff impact zones and must meet a minimum setback of 300 SMO- 260.081 -27- 260 -081 -10 DRAFT Revised August 21, 1998 feet from the ordinary high water level of all public waters basins; and (2) modifications or expansions to existing feedlots that are located within 300 feet of the ordinary high water level or within a bluff impact zone are allowed if they do not further encroach into the existing ordinary high water level setback or encroach on bluff impact zones. 5.63 Forest Management Standards. The harvesting of timber and associated reforestation must be conducted consistent with the provisions of the Minnesota Nonpoint Source Pollution Assessment - Forestry and the provisions of Water Quality in Forest Management "Best Management Practices in Minnesota. " 5.64 Extractive Use Standards. A. Site Development and Restoration Plan. An extractive use site development and restoration plan must be developed, approved, and followed over the course of operation of the site. The plan must address dust, noise, possible pollutant discharges, hours and duration of operation, and anticipated vegetation and topographic alterations. It must also identify actions to be taken during operation to mitigate adverse environmental impacts, particularly erosion, and must clearly explain how the site will be rehabilitated after extrac ive activities end. B. Setbacks for Processing Machinery. Processing machinery must be located consistent with setback standards for structures from ordinary high water levels of public waters and from bluffs. 5.65 Mining of Metallic Minerals and Peat. Mining of metallic minerals and peat, as defined in Minnesota Statutes, sections 93.44 to 93.51, shall be a permitted use provided the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, sections 93.44 to 93.51, are satisfied. 5.7 Conditional Uses Conditional uses allowable within shoreland areas shall be subject to the review and approval procedures, and criteria and conditions for review of conditional uses established community-wide. The following additional evaluation criteria and conditions apply within shoreland areas: 5.71 Evaluation criteria. A thorough evaluation of the waterbody and the topographic, vegetation, and soils conditions on the site must be made to ensure: (1) the prevention of soil erosion or other possible pollution of public waters, both during and after construction; SMO- 260.081 28 260- 081 -10 DRAFT Revised August 21, 1998 (2) the visibility of structures and other facilities as viewed from public waters is limited; (3) the site is adequate for water supply and on -site sewage treatment; and (4) the types, uses, and numbers of watercraft that the project will generate are compatible in relation to the suitability of public waters to safely accommodate these watercraft. 5.72 Conditions attached to conditional use permits. The City of Centerville, upon consideration of the criteria listed above and the purposes of this ordinance, shall attach such conditions to the issuance of the conditional use permits as it deems necessary to fulfill the purposes of this ordinance. Such conditions may include, but are not limited to, the following: (1) increased setbacks from the ordinary high water level; (2) limitations on the natural vegetation to be removed or the requirement that additional vegetation be planted; and (3) Special provisions for the location, design, and use of structures, sewage treatment systems, watercraft launching and docking areas, and vehicle parking areas. 5.8 Water Supply and Sewage Treatment 5.81 Water Supply. Any public or private supply of water for domestic purposes must meet or exceed standards for water quality of the Minnesota Department of Health and the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency. 5.82 Sewage treatment. Any premises used for human occupancy must be provided with an adequate method of sewage treatment, as follows: A. No new individual sewage treatment systems will be allowed. B. All private sewage treatment systems must meet or exceed the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency's standards for individual sewage treatment systems contained in the document titled, "Individual Sewage Treatment Systems Standards, Chapter 7080 ", a copy of which is hereby adopted by reference and declared to be a part of this ordinance. C. On -site sewage treatment systems must be set back from the ordinary high water level in accordance with the setbacks contained in Section 5.21 of this ordinance. D. All proposed sites for individual sewage treatment systems shall be evaluated in accordance with the criteria in subitems (1) -(4). If the SN40- 260.081 -29- 260- 081 -10 DRAFT Revised August 21, 1998 determination of a site's suitability cannot be made with publicly available, existing information, it shall then be the responsibility of the applicant to provide sufficient soil borings and percolation tests from on -site field investigations. Evaluation criteria: (1) depth to the highest known or calculated ground water table or bedrock; (2) soil conditions, properties, and permeability; (3) slope; (4) the existence of lowlands, local surface depressions, and rock outcrops; E. Nonconforming sewage treatment systems shall be regulated and upgraded in accordance with section 6.13 of this ordinance. SECTION 6.0 - NONCONFORMITIES All legally established nonconformities as of the date of this ordinance may continue, but they will be managed according to applicable state statutes and other regulations of this community for the subjects of alterations and additions, repair after damage, discontinuance of use, and intensification of use; except that the following standards wil also apply in shoreland areas: 6.1 Construction on nonconforming lots of record. A. Lots of record in the office of the county recorder on the date of enactment of local shoreland controls that do not meet the requirements of Section 5.1 of this ordinance may be allowed as building sites without variances from lot size requirements provided the use is permitted in the zoning district, the lot has been in separate ownership from abutting lands at all times since it became substandard, was created compliant with official controls in effect at the time, and sewage treatment and setback requirements of this ordinance are met. B. A variance from setback requirements must be obtained before any use, sewage treatment system, or building permit is issued for a lot. In evaluating the variance, the board of adjustment shall consider sewage treatment and water supply capabilities or constraints of the lot and shall deny the variance if adequate facilities cannot be provided. C. If, in a group of two or more contiguous lots under the same ownership, any individual lot does not meet the requirements of Section 5.1 of this ordinance the lot must not be considered as a separate parcel of land for the purposes of sale or development. The lot must be combined with the one or more contiguous lots so they equal one or more parcels of land, each meeting the requirements of Section 5.1 of this ordinance as much as possible. SMO- 260.081 30 260- 081 -10 DRAFT Revised August 21, 1998 6.2 Additions /expansions to nonconforming structures. A. All additions or expansions to the outside dimensions of an existing nonconforming structure must meet the setback, height, and other requirements of Section 5.0 of this ordinance. Any deviation from these requirements must be authorized by a variance pursuant to Section 3.3. B. Deck additions may be allowed without a variance to a structure not meeting the required setback from the ordinary high water level if all of the following criteria and standards are met: (1) the structure existed on the date the structure setbacks were established; (2) a thorough evaluation of the property and structure reveals no reasonable location for a deck meeting or exceeding the existing ordinary high water level setback of the structure; (3) the deck encroachment toward the ordinary high water level does not exceed 15 percent of the existing setback of the structure from the ordinary high water level or does not encroach closer than 30 feet, whichever is more restrictive; and (4) the deck is constructed primarily of wood, and is not roofed or screened. 6.3 Nonconforming sewage treatment systems. A. A sewage treatment system not meeting the requirements of Section 5.8 of this ordinance must be upgraded, at a minimum, at any time a permit or variance of any type is required for any improvement on, or use of, the property. For the purposes of this provision, a sewage treatment system shall not be considered nonconforming if the only deficiency is the sewage treatment system's improper setback from the ordinary high water level. B. The governing body of the City of Centerville has by formal resolution notified the commissioner of its program to identify nonconforming sewage treatment systems. The City of Centerville will require upgrading or replacement of any nonconforming system identified by this program within a reasonable period of time which will not exceed 2- years. Sewage systems installed according to all applicable local shoreland management standards adopted under Minnesota Statutes, section 105.485 (now 103F.201 -.221] in effect at the time of installation may be considered as conforming unless they are determined to be failing, except that systems using cesspools, leaching pits, seepage pits, or other deep disposal methods, or systems with less soil treatment area separation above groundwater than required by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency's Chapter 7080 for design of on -site sewage treatment systems, shall be considered nonconforming. SMO- 260.081 31 260 -081 -10 DRAFT Revised August 21, 1998 SECTION 7.0 - SUBDIVISION /PLATTING PROVISIONS 7.11 Land suitability. Each lot created through subdivision, including planned unit developments authorized under Section 8.0 of this ordinance, must be suitable in its natural state for the proposed use with minimal alteration. Suitability analysis by the local unit of government shall consider susceptibility to flooding, existence of wetlands, soil and rock formations with severe limitations for development, severe erosion potential, steep topography, inadequate water supply or sewage treatment capabilities, near -shore aquatic conditions unsuitable for water -based recreation, important fish and wildlife habitat, presence of significant historic sites, or any other feature of the natural land likely to be harmful to the health, safety, or welfare of future residents of the proposed subdivision or of the community. 7.12 Consistency with other controls. Subdivisions must conform to all official controls of this community. A subdivision will not be approved where a later variance from one or more standards in official controls would be needed to use the lots for their intended purpose. In areas not served by publicly owned sewer and water systems, a subdivision will not be approved unless domestic water supply is available and a sewage treatment system consistent with Sections 5.2 and 5.8 can be provided for every lot. Each lot shall meet the minimum lot size and dimensional requirements of Section 5. 1, including at least a minimum contiguous lawn area, that is free of limiting factors sufficient for the construction of two standard soil treatment systems. Lots that would require use of holding tanks must not be approved. 7.13 Information requirements. Sufficient information must be submitted by the applicant for the community to make a determination of land suitability. The information shall include at least the following: (1) topographic contours at ten -foot intervals or less from United States Geological Survey maps or more accurate sources, showing limiting site characteristics; (2) the surface water features required in Minnesota Statutes, section 505.02, subdivision 1, to be shown on plats, obtained from United States Geological Survey quadrangle topographic maps or more accurate sources; (3) adequate soils information to determine suitability for building and on -site sewage treatment capabilities for every lot from the most current existing sources or from field investigations such as soil borings, percolation tests, or other methods; (4) information regarding adequacy of domestic water supply; extent of anticipated vegetation and topographic alterations; near -shore aquatic conditions, including depths, types of bottom sediments, and aquatic vegetation; and proposed methods for controlling stormwater runoff and erosion, both during and after construction activities; SMO- 260.081 32 260- 081 -10 DRAFT Revised August 21, 1998 (5) location of 100 -year flood plain areas and floodway districts from existing adopted maps or data; and (6) a line or contour representing the ordinary high water level, the "toe" and the "top" of bluffs, and the minimum building setback distances from the top of the bluff and the lake or stream. 7.14 Dedications. When a land or easement dedication is a condition of subdivision approval, the approval must provide easements over natural drainage or ponding areas for management of stormwater and significant wetlands. 7.15 Platting. All subdivisions that create five or more lots or parcels that are 2 -1/2 acres or less in size shall be processed as a plat in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 505. No permit for construction of buildings or sewage treatment systems shall be issued for lots created after these official controls were enacted unless the lot was approved as part of a formal subdivision. 7.16 Controlled Access or Recreational Lots. Lots intended as controlled accesses to public waters or for recreational use areas for use by nonriparian lots within a subdivision must meet or exceed the sizing criteria in Section 5.14 of this ordinance. SECTION 8.0 - PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENTS (PUD's) 8.1 Types of PUD's Permissible Planned unit developments (PUD's) are allowed for new projects on undeveloped land, redevelopment of previously built sites, or conversions of existing buildings and land. The Iand use districts in which they are an allowable use are identified in the land use district descriptions in Section 4.2 of this ordinance and the official zoning map. 8.2 Processing of PUD's Planned unit developments must be processed as a conditional use, except that an expansion to an existing commercial PUD involving 6 or less new dwelling units or sites since the date this ordinance was adopted is permissible as a permitted use provided the total project density does not exceed the allowable densities calculated in the project density evaluation procedures in Section 8.5. Approval cannot occur until the environmental review process (EAW /EIS) is complete. 8.3 Application For a PUD The applicant for a PUD must submit the following documents prior to final action being taken on the application request: 8.31 A site plan and /or plat for the project showing locations of property boundaries, surface water features, existing and proposed structures and other facilities, land sMO- 260.081 -33- 260 - 081 -10 DRAFT Revised August 21, 1998 alterations, sewage treatment and water supply systems (where public systems will not be provided), and topographic contours at ten -foot intervals or less. When a PUD is a combined commercial and residential development, the site plan and /or plat must indicate and distinguish which buildings and portions of the project are residential, commercial, or a combination of the two. 8.32 A property owners association agreement (for residential PUD's) with mandatory membership, and all in accordance with the requirements of Section 8.6 of this ordinance. 8.33 Deed restrictions, covenants, permanent easements or other instruments that: 1) properly address future vegetative and topographic alterations, construction of additional buildings, beaching of watercraft, and construction of commercial buildings in residential PUD's; and 2) ensure the long -term preservation and maintenance of open space in accordance with the criteria and analysis specified in Section 8.6 of this ordinance. 8.34 When necessary, a master plan/drawing describing the project and the floor plan for all commercial structures to be occupied. 8.35 Those additional documents as requested by the City of Centerville Building Inspector that are necessary to explain how the PUD will be designed and will function. 8.4 Site "Suitable Area" Evaluation Proposed new or expansions to existing planned unit developments must be evaluated using the following procedures and standards to determine the suitable area for the dwelling unit/dwelling site density evaluation in Section 8.5. 8.41 The project parcel must be divided into tiers by locating one or more lines approximately parallel to a line that identifies the ordinary high water level at the following intervals, proceeding landward: Shoreland Tier Dimensions Unsewered Sewered (feet) (feet) General development lakes - first tier 200 200 General development lakes - second and additional tiers 267 200 Recreational development lakes 267 267 Natural environment lakes 400 320 All river classes 300 300 8.42 The suitable area within each tier is next calculated by excluding from the tier area all wetlands, bluffs, or land below the ordinary high water level of public waters. sMO- 260.081 -34- 260 - 081 -10 DRAFT Revised August 21, 1998 This suitable area and the proposed project are then subjected to either the residential or commercial planned unit development density evaluation steps to arrive at an allowable number of dwelling units or sites. 8.5 Residential and Commercial PUD Density Evaluation The procedures for determining the "base" density of a PUD and density increase multipliers are as follows. Allowable densities may be transferred from any tier to any other tier further from the waterbody, but must not be transferred to any other tier closer. 8.51 Residential PUD 'Base" Density Evaluation: A. The suitable area within each tier is divided by the single residential lot size standard for lakes or, for rivers, the single residential lot width standard times the tier depth, unless the local unit of government has specified an alternative minimum lot size for rivers which shall then be used to yield a base density of dwelling units or sites for each tier. Proposed locations and numbers of dwelling units or sites for the residential planned unit developments are then compared with the tier, density, and suitability analyses herein and the design criteria in Section 8.6 8.52 Commercial PUD 'Base" Density Evaluation: A. Determine the average inside living area size of dwelling units or sites within each tier, including both existing and proposed units and sites. Computation of inside living area sizes need not include decks, patios, stoops, steps, garages, or porches and basements, unless they are habitable space. B. Select the appropriate floor area ratio from the following table: 510- 260.081 -35- 260- 081 -10 DRAFT Revised August 21, 1998 Commercial Planned Unit Development Floor Area Ratios* Public waters classes Sewered general Second and development additional tiers lakes; first on unsewered tier on general unsewered development general lakes; development recreational lakes; urban, development Natural *Average agricultural, lakes; environment unit floor tributary transition and lakes and area (sq. river forested river remote river ft� segments segments segments 200 .040 .020 .010 300 .048 .024 .012 400 .056 .028 .014 500 .065 .03Z .016 600 .072 .038 .019 700 .082 .042 .021 800 .091 .046 .023 900 .099 .050 .025 1,000 .108 .054 .027 1,100 .116 .058 .029 1,200 .125 .064 .032 1,300 .133 .068 .034 1,400 .142 .072 .036 1,500 .150 .075 .038 *For average unit floor areas less than shown, use the floor area ratios listed for 200 square feet. For areas greater than shown, use the ratios listed for 1,500 square feet. For recreational camping areas, use the ratios listed at 400 square feet. Manufactured home sites in recreational camping areas shall use a ratio equal to the size of the manufactured home, or if unknown, the ratio listed for 1,000 square feet. C. Multiply the suitable area within each tier by the floor area ratio to yield total floor area for each tier allowed to be used for dwelling units or sites. D. Divide the total floor area by tier computed in Item C. above by the average inside living area size determined in Item A. above. This yields a base number of dwelling units and sites for each tier. E. Proposed locations and numbers of dwelling units or sites for the commercial planned unit development are then compared with the tier, SMO- 260.081 36 260 - 081 -10 DRAFT Revised August 21, 1998 density and suitability analyses herein and the design criteria in Section 8.6. 8.53 Density Increase Multipliers: A. Increases to the dwelling unit or dwelling site base densities previously determined are allowable if the dimensional standards in Section 5.0 are met or exceeded and the design criteria in Section 8.6 are satisfied. The allowable density increases in Item B. below will only be allowed if structure setbacks from the ordinary high water level are increased to at least 50 percent greater than the minimum setback, or the impact on the waterbody is reduced an equivalent amount through vegetative management, topography, or additional means acceptable to the local unit of government and the setback is at least 25 percent greater than the minimum setback. B. Allowable Dwelling Unit or Dwelling Site Density Increases for Residential or Commercial Planned Unit Developments: Density evaluation tiers Maximum density increase within each tier (percent) First 50 Second 100 Third 200 Fourth 200 Fifth 200 8.6 Maintenance and Design Criteria 8.61 Maintenance and Administration Requirements. A. Before final approval of a planned unit development, adequate provisions must be developed for preservation and maintenance in perpetuity of open spaces and for the continued existence and functioning of the development. B. Open space preservation. Deed restrictions, covenants, permanent easements, public dedication and acceptance, or other equally effective and permanent means must be provided to ensure long -term preservation and maintenance of open space. The instruments must include all of the following protections: (1) commercial uses prohibited (for residential PUD's); (2) vegetation and topographic alterations other than routine maintenance prohibited; SMO- 260.081 -37- 260 - 081 -10 DRAFT Revised August 21, 1998 (3) construction of additional buildings or storage of vehicles and other materials prohibited; and (4) uncontrolled beaching of watercraft prohibited. C. Development organization and functioning. Unless an equally effective alternative community framework is established, when applicable, all residential planned unit developments must use an owners association with the following features: (1) membership must be mandatory for each dwelling unit or site purchaser and any successive purchasers; (2) each member must pay a pro rata share of the association's expenses, and unpaid assessments can become liens on units or sites; (3) assessments must be adjustable to accommodate changing conditions; and (4) the association must be responsible for insurance, taxes, and maintenance of all commonly owned property and facilities. 8.62 Open Space Requirements. Pla ed unit developments must contain open space meeting all of the following criteria: A. At least 50 percent of the total project area must be preserved as open space; B. Dwelling units or sites, road rights -of -way, or land covered by road surfaces, parking areas, or structures, except water - oriented accessory structures or facilities, are developed areas and shall not be included in the computation of minimum open space; C. Open space must include areas with physical characteristics unsuitable for development in their natural state, and areas containing significant historic sites or unplatted cemeteries; D. Open space may include outdoor recreational facilities for use by owners of dwelling units or sites, by guests staying in commercial dwelling units or sites, and by the general public; E. Open space may include subsurface sewage treatment systems if the use of the space is restricted to avoid adverse impacts on the systems; F. Open space must not include commercial facilities or uses, but may contain water- oriented accessory structures or facilities; SMO- 260.081 -38- 260- 081 -10 DRAFT Revised August 21, 1998 G. The appearance of open space areas, including topography, vegetation, and allowable uses, must be preserved by use of restrictive deed covenants, permanent easements, public dedication and acceptance, or other equally effective and permanent means; and H. The shore impact zone, based on normal structure setbacks, must be included as open space. For residential PUD's, at least 50 percent of the shore impact zone area of existing developments or at least 70 percent of the shore impact zone area of new developments must be preserved in its natural or existing state. For commercial PUD's, at least 50 percent of the shore impact zone must be preserved in its natural state. 8.63 Erosion Control and Stormwater Management. Erosion control and stormwater management plans must be developed and the PUD must: A. Be designed, and the construction managed, to minimize the likelihood of serious erosion occurring either during or after construction. This must be accomplished by limiting the amount and length of time of bare ground exposure. Temporary ground covers, sediment entrapment facilities, vegetated buffer strips, or other appropriate techniques must be used to minimize erosion impacts on surface water features. Erosion control plans approved by a soil and water conservation district may be required if project size and site physical characteristics warrant; and B. Be designed and constructed to effectively manage reasonably expected quantities and qualities of stormwater runoff. Impervious surface coverage within any tier must not exceed 25 percent of the tier area, except that for commercial PUD's 35 percent impervious surface coverage may be allowed in the first tier of general development lakes with an approved stormwater management plan and consistency with Section 5.3. 8.64 Centralization and Design of Facilities. Centralization and design of facilities and structures must be done according to the following standards: A. Planned unit developments must be connected to publicly owned water supply and sewer systems, if available. On -site water supply and sewage treatment systems must be centralized and designed and installed to meet or exceed applicable standards or rules of the Minnesota Department of Health and Sections 5.2 and 5.8 of this ordinance. On -site sewage treatment systems must be located on the most suitable areas of the development, and sufficient lawn area free of limiting factors must be provided for a replacement soil treatment system for each sewage system; B. Dwelling units or sites must be clustered into one or more groups and located on suitable areas of the development. They must be designed and located to meet or exceed the following dimensional standards for the sMO- 260.081 -39- 260 - 081 -10 DRAFT Revised August 21, 1998 relevant shoreland classification: setback from the ordinary high water level, elevation above the surface water features, and maximum height. Setbacks from the ordinary high water level must be increased in accordance with Section 8.53 of this ordinance for developments with density increases; C. Shore recreation facilities, including but not limited to swimming areas, docks, and watercraft mooring areas and launching ramps, must be centralized and located in areas suitable for them. Evaluation of suitability must include consideration of land slope, water depth, vegetation, soils, depth to groundwater and bedrock, or other relevant factors. The number of spaces provided for continuous beaching, mooring, or docking of watercraft must not exceed one for each allowable dwelling unit or site in the first tier (notwithstanding existing mooring sites in an existing commercially used harbor). Launching ramp facilities, including a small dock for loading and unloading equipment, may be provided for use by occupants of dwelling units or sites located in other tiers; D. Structures, parking areas, and other facilities must be treated to reduce visibility as viewed from public waters and adjacent shorelands by vegetation, topography, increased setbacks, color, or other means acceptable to the local unit of government, assuming summer, leaf -on conditions. Vegetative and topographic screening must be preserved, if existing, or may be required to be provided; E. Accessory structures and facilities, except water oriented accessory structures, must meet the required principal structure setback and must be centralized; and F. Water- oriented accessory structures and facilities may be allowed if they meet or exceed design standards contained in Section 5.2 of this ordinance and are centralized. 8.7 Conversions Local governments may allow existing resorts or other land uses and facilities to be converted to residential planned unit developments if all of the following standards are met: 8.71 Proposed conversions must be initially evaluated using the same procedures for residential planned unit developments involving all new construction. Inconsistencies between existing features of the development and these standards must be identified. 8.72 Deficiencies involving water supply and sewage treatment, structure color, impervious coverage, open space, and shore recreation facilities must be corrected as part of the conversion or as specified in the conditional use permit. sMO- 260.081 -40- 260 - 081 -10 DRAFT Revised August 21, 1998 8.73 Shore and bluff impact zone deficiencies must be evaluated and reasonable improvements made as part of the conversion. These improvements must include, where applicable, the following: A. Removal of extraneous buildings, docks, or other facilities that no longer need to be located in shore or bluff impact zones; B. Remedial measures to correct erosion sites and improve vegetative cover and screening of buildings and other facilities as viewed from the water; and C. If existing dwelling units are located in shore or bluff impact zones, conditions are attached to approvals of conversions that preclude exterior expansions in any dimension or substantial alterations. The conditions must also provide for future relocation of dwelling units, where feasible, to other locations, meeting all setback and elevation requirements when they are rebuilt or replaced. 8.74 Existing dwelling unit or dwelling site densities that exceed standards in Section 8.5 may be allowed to continue but must not be allowed to be increased, either at the time of conversion or in the future. Efforts must be made during the conversion to limit impacts of high densities by requiring seasonal use, improving vegetative screening, centralizing shore recreation facilities, installing new sewage treatment systems, or other means. solo- 260.081 -41- 260 - 081 -10 DRAFT Revised August 21, 1998 APPENDIX A ORDINANCE CERTIFICATION CHECKLIST [CITY /COUNTY NAME) Once all the below listed tasks are completed, please sign and return the checklist and all required documents to the appropriate DNR area hydrologist. 1. Date of published hearing notice. 2. Date of postmark of hearing notice to commissioner of the Department of Natural Resources /area hydrologist. 3. Date of hearing(s). 4. Date of ordinance adoption. 5. If ordinance is published in entirety, date and affidavit of newspaper publication of adopted ordinance (Include three copies of ordinance). 6. If only ordinance summary published, date and affidavit of newspaper publication of ordinance title and summary along with certified copy of adopted ordinance in its entirety from clerk/auditor. (Include three copies of ordinance) 7. Date of official filing of adopted ordinance with county recorder ( record book number page number). S. Yes No Board of adjustment and appeals has been established? *Note: Cities under charter must also submit a list of any additional requirements for hearings, notices, etc. stated in their charter. Please specify: Signature of Clerk/Auditor SMO- 260.081 260 -081 -10 e tery *ffe 1880 -Main Stre • C enterville, MN 5503 Established 1857 (612) 4293232 • FaX (612) 429 -8629 CITY OF CENTERVILLE ANOKA COUNTY, MINNESOTA - NOTICE OF BUDGET WORKSHOP MONDAY, AUGUST 24 1998 - 7;00 P.M. _ NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Centerville City Council will attend a Circle Pines- -- Lexington Joint Police Commission budget workshop on Monday, August 24, 1998, 7:00 P.M. at Circle Pines City Hall, 200 Civil Heights Drive, Circle Pines. The purpose of the workshop is to discuss the 1999 budget and to discuss other business. Please contact the City Clerk's office with questions 429 -3232. DATED: August 20, 19 8 �p 1, SIGNED: � 1i{ (Q LtL ��fiC Ry.hel Gaustad, CMC City Clerk l< �CiI l l l fe 1880 -M S treet • C entervi((z, M91( 55038 i Tsstti6C15(2ed 1857 (612) 429 -3232 • FaX (612) 429 -8629 CITY OF CENTERVILLE ANOKA COUNTY, MINNESOTA NOTICE OF WORKSHOP WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 2, 1998 6:00 P.M. NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Centerville City Council will hold a workshop on Wednesday, September 2, 1998, 6:00 P.M. at City Hall, 1880 Main Street. The purpose of the workshop is to discuss the 1999 budget and to discuss other city business. No action will be taken at this workshop. However, the public is welcome to attend. Please contact the City Clerk's office with questions 429 -3232. DATED: t,Y3i gmst � 20� SIGNED: l Ry hel Gaustad, CMC City Clerk Howard R, Green Company _ CONSULTING ENGINEERS erU2ZL2 _. Zff4&UW :857 CITY OF CENTERVILLE PUBLIC HEARING 21 st Avenue North Street and Storm Sewer Improvements August 26, 1998 Centerville Council Chambers Tom Wilharber, Mayor Sanna Buckbee, Council Member Mary Jo Helmbrecht, Council Member Theresa Brenner, Council Member Laura Powers, Council Member Jim March, Administrator Ry -Chel Gaustad, City Clerk David Nyberg, City Engineer 802690J- public. hearing.doc o Howard R. Green Company CONSULTING ENGINEERS te7yAe aired aw r"7 AGENDA I. CALL TO ORDER II. PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS III. PROJECT COST IV. PROJECT SCHEDULE V. PROPOSED ASSESSMENTS VI. PROPERTY OWNER QUESTIONS AND COMMENTS VII. ADJOURN 802690J- public. hearing. doc Howard R. Green Company CONSULTING ENGINEERS ( 4 , t em"ll e aMMW ras 7 PROPOSEDIMPROVEMENTS • Bituminous Surfacing • 38 Feet Wide • ±900 Feet Long • Curb and Gutter • Storm Sewer • Ditch and Boulevard Grading • Utilities by Lino Lakes already complete • Erosion Control • Turf Restoration 802690J -p ubl ic. hean ng.d oc Howard R. Green Company CONSULTING ENGINEERS tmrwiIIe s.s�etin�e rase TOTAL PROJECT COSTS Site Work $5,000.00 Street $120,000.00 Storm Sewer $30,000.00 TOTAL PROJECT COST $155 Note: Above cost does not include turn lanes on Main Street. Costs are estimates only, and have not been reviewed by the City of Lino Lakes. 802690J-public. h ea ring.doc O Howard R. Green Company CONSULTING ENGINEERS �2?"U2Z18 PROJECT SCHEDULE Public Hearing August 26, 1998 Plan Approval and Order Advertisement September 9, 1998 for Bids Bid Opening (Lino Lakes) October 8, 1998 Award Project (Lino Lakes) October 12, 1998 Begin Construction October 26, 1998 Assessment Hearing October 28, 1998 Complete Construction November 1998 and Spring 1999 802690) -pu blic. hearin g. doc ALG-05 -1998 1545 CITY OF LINO LAKES 612 464 4568 P. 82/02 I S.A.H. N0. 14 I li _ _ —ffl&� _ _ ----- - - -- -- °®" - - ---- -- - -- - -- j I < 1 ii•:£= 1 1 { �jj 1 1 j SAM //_ /per \\ I • r rI I 3]r 1 1 � I PAIN max:: I i t ;r�•::: r 9 1 2 3 1 2 CITY BOUNDARY { 38, I s ` I 1 4 UCTION I C=EXCEPTION TOTAL P.02 OP Howard R, Green Company CONSULTING ENGINEERS , ternville a,rmr,�a rasp CITY OF CENTERVILLE ASSESSMENT HEARING Parkview Addition Sanitary Sewer, Watermain, Street, and Storm Sewer Improvements August 26, 1998 Centerville Council Chambers Tom Wilharber, Mayor Sanna Buckbee, Council Member Mary Jo Helmbrecht, Council Member Theresa Brenner, Council Member Laura Powers, Council Member Jim March, Administrator Ry -Chel Gaustad, City Clerk David Nyberg, City Engineer 260089M- assessment. hea ri ng.doc Howard R. Green Company CONSULTING ENGINEERS to yNe aawersnea rug AGENDA 1. CALL TO ORDER 11. PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS Ill. PROJECT COST IV. PROJECT SCHEDULE V. PROPOSED ASSESSMENTS VI. PROPERTY OWNER QUESTIONS AND COMMENTS VII. ADJOURN 260089M- assessment. hearing. doc IF op Howard R, Green Company CONSULTING ENGINEERS krviLLe _. a.watt%W t 7 PROPOSEDIMPROVEMENTS • Street with Curb and Gutter • Storm Sewer • Lateral Sanitary Sewer & Watermain • Individual Services • Hydrants • Erosion Control • Watermain Along Centerville Road • Trunk Watermain • Hydrants • Services • Turf Restoration • Sodding • Seeding 260069M -a ssessme nt. he ari ng. d o c OP Howard R, Green Company CONSULTING ENGINEERS terville . a.t"WPi d 1457 TOTAL PROJECT COSTS Site Work $15,727.50 Street $185,920.00 Bituminous Trail $4,857.50 Storm Sewer $54,535.00 Watermain $121,841.00 Sanitary Sewer $61,398.00 TOTAL PROJECT COST $444 ALTERNATES Eagle Pass Connection $27,692.50 Drain Tile Alternate $23,229.00 Sub -Total $50,921.50 TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COST $495 Overhead (30 %) $148,560.15 TOTAL PROJECT COST $643,760.65 260089M- assessment. hearing. doc IF Howard R. Green Company CONSULTING ENGINEERS tBrU2Lle arm:rh<e rasr PROJECT SCHEDULE Review Draft Feasibility Study March 11, 1998 Receive Final Feasibility Study March 25, 1997 Public Hearing April 22, 1997 Plan Approval and Order Advertisement May 27, 1998 for Bids Bid Opening July 14, 1998 Project Awarded, Notice to Proceed August 24, 1998 Public Hearing and Assessment Hearing August 26, 1998 Begin Construction August 1998 Complete Construction October 1998 260089M- assessment. heari ng.doc ASSESS,. T ROLL FOR: CITY OFc .17ERVILLE PARKVIEW ADDITION (260089M-0583) M v4 W .1, Un ME; 220-MMMAXAM I 23-31-22-23-0003 Arnold Drew)o 7029 Centerville Road Centerville, MN 55038 $ 1.741.23 2 23-31-22-23-0051 St. Genevieve Church 1664 Heritage Street Centerville, JAN 55038 $ 13,279.36 3 23-31-22-23-0052 St. Genevieve Church 1664 Herita2e Street Centerville, MN 55038 $ 4 23-31-22-24-0007 C auncey Barett Gardens 7024 Centerville Road Centerville, MN 55038 $ 5 23-31-22-24-0008 Richard Thompson 7008 Centerville Road Centerville, MN 55038 $ 1.741.23 6 23-31-22-32-0008 John and Cindy Rieder 6977 Centerville Road Centerville, MN 55038 $ 1,741.23 7 23-31-22-32-0007 Dean Anderson 6961 Centerville Road Centerville, MN 55038 $ 1,741.23 6 23-31-22-32-0017 Robert Barest 6953 Centerville Road Centerville, MN 55038 $ 1,741.23 9 23-31-22-32-0039 Stan Hasiak 6994 Centerville Road Centerville, MN 55038 $ 1,741.23 10 Stan Hasiak 6994 Centerville Road Centerville, MN 55038 $ 12.389.99 11 1 1 Rick Carlson 7671 Central Ave NE Fridley, MN 55432 $ 12.389.99 12 2 1 Rick Carlson 7671 Central Ave NE Fridley, MN 55432 $ 12.389.99 13 3 1 Rick Carlson 7671 Central Ave NE Fridley, MN 55432 $ 12.389.99 14 4 1 Rick Carlson 7671 Central Ave NE Fridley, MN 55432 $ 12,389.99 15 5 1 Rick Carlson 7671 Central Ave NE Fridley. MN 55432 $ 12.389.99 16 6 1 Rick Carlson 7671 Central Ave NE Fridley, MN 55432 $ 12,389.99 17 7 1 Rick Carlson 7671 Central Ave NE Fridley, MN 55432 $ 12,389.99 18 8 1 Rick Carlson 7671 Central Ave NE Fridley, MN 55432 ... $ 12,389.99 19 1 2 Rick Carlson 7671 Central Ave NE - Fridley, MN 55432 $ 12,389.99 20 2 2 Rick Carlson 7671 Central Ave NE Fridley, MN 55432 $ 12,389.99 21 3 2 Rick Carlson 7671 Central Ave NE _ Fridley, MN 55432 $ 12.389.99 22 4 2 Rick Carlson 7671 Central Ave NE Fridley, MN 55432 $ 12,389.99 23 6 2 Rick Carlson 7671 Central Ave NE Fridley, MN 55432 $ 12,389.99 24 6 2 Rick Carlson 7671 Central Ave NE Fridley, MN 55432 $ 12,389.99 25 7 2 Rick Carlson 7671 Central Ave NE Fridley, MN 55432 $ 12,389.99 26 a 2 Rick Carlson 7671 Central Ave NE Fridley, MN 55432 $ 12,389. 1 27 9 2 Rick Carlson 7671 Central Ave NE Fridley. MN 55432 $ 12,389.99 28 10 2 Rick Carlson 7671 Central Ave NE Fridley, MN 55432 $ 12,389.99 29 11 2 Rick Carlson 7671 Central Ave NE - Fridley, MN 55432 $ 12 260089ar Pare 1 ASSESS,, .4T ROLL FOR: CITY OF C i ERVILLE PARKVIEW ADDITION (260D89M -0583) w ar .w.. ?FE... .:.n,.....:o: +�; xna' k >3.:r ..: x.<<: v:r:•:ez:.<&uas::: r . s ate „,. , ^ < ` s '.. : . .: :: .:r:s.:>::� • ,.. .< .. <..si �. .:.M, ., :.: ,.>: ... ..:.... :'?.Y.�- ,..s.:.a:>p;=3�,„. cg's s q�. . a n.. ... t:. :E?�. �,3: «.,..,., }a.. ,: :... s >:. a•. +: �, � :. ::..,.,;...::<s:, .,,.:w.(.} ::<� .. .m,�`"::.�: :: .< . ^.: cFS.$% > ". >!?x.:.,a?$.;f° : �>' ?ssz...l::...k.; ..r :.:.....:..:. ,g ..;.�`; •r :ti.... ::P ..: >..: Y...zhk... ¢�.��...�. .. ::..:::,...... ..� � ,........ .E:�1�`',7G'"�:5 y �y(�/��iw�y > Ys >.... �5 �� ::.... :.... ...r:..:... ... :.w.., .. .::. .........} isf.?: i•..::.::..:, Y?: �: Y....m::Y..sfRl «:e::.3 30 12 2 Rick Carlson 7671 Central Ave NE Fridley, MN 55432 $ 12,389,99 31 13 2 Rick Carlson 7671 Central Ave NE Fridley. MN 55432 $ 12,389.99 32 14 2 Rick Carlson 7671 Central Ave NE Fridley, MN 55432 $ 12,389.99 33 15 2 Rick Carlson 7671 Central Ave NE Fridley, MN 55432 $ 12,389 34 16 2 Rick Carlson 7671 Central Ave NE Fridley, MN 55432 $ 12,389.99 35 17 2 Rick Carlson 7671 Central Ave NE Fridley, MN 55432 $ 12,389.99 36 18 2 Rick Carlson 7671 Central Ave NE Fridley, MN 55432 $ 12,389.99 37 19 2 Rick Carlson 7671 Central Ave NE Fridley. MN 55432 $ 12,389.99 38 20 2 Rick Carlson 7671 Central Ave NE Fridley. MN 55432 $ 12,389.99 39 21 2 Rick Carlson 7671 Central Ave NE Fridley, MN 55432 $ 12,389.99 40 22 2 Rick Carlson 7671 Central Ave NE Fridley, MN 55432 $ 12,389.99 41 23 2 Rick Carlson 7671 Central Ave NE Fridley. MN 55432 $ 12,389.99 42 24 2 Rick Carlson 7671 Central Ave NE Fridley, MN 55432 $ 12,389.99 43 25 2 Rick Carlson 7671 Central Ave NE Fridley. MN 55432 $ 12,389.99 44 26 2 Rick Carlson 7671 Central Ave NE Fridley, MN 55432 $ 12,389.99 45 27 2 Rick Carlson 7671 Central Ave NE Fridley, MN 55432 $ 12,389.99 46 1 3 Rick Carlson 7671 Central Ave NE Fridley. MN 55432 $ 12,389.99 47 2 3 Rick Carlson 7671 Central Ave NE Fridley. MN 55432 $ 12,389.99 48 3 3 Rick Carlson 7671 Central Ave NE Fridley, MN 55432 $ 12,389.99 49 4 3 Rick Carlson 7671 Central Ave NE Fridley, MN 55432 $ 12,389.99 50 5 3 Rick Carlson 7671 Central Ave NE Fridle , MN 55432 $ 12,389.99 51 6 3 Rick Carlson 7671 Central Ave NE Fridley, MN 55432 $ 12,389.99 52 7 3 Rick Carlson 7671 Central Ave NE Fridley, MN 55432 $ 12,389.99 TOTALASSESSMENTS $ 556,496.31 26(N)k9sr ASSESSMENT SCHEDULE Constant Annual Payment Method Project: PARKVIEW ADDITION Lot: Project 260089M (0583) Block: Parcel: 23- 31 -22 -23 -0003 Addition: Owner: Arnold Drewlo Interest Start Date August 26, 1998 Repayment Period 10 yrs Interest Rate: 8.00% Assessments Unit Measure Unit Pri Amount Watermain Improvements LS 1,741.23 $ 1,741.23 YEAR SCHEDULED PRI CIPAL INTEREST PRINCIPAL PAYMENT PAYMENT PAYMENT REMAINING 1998 $ - $ - $ - $ 1,741.23 1999 $ 284.68 $ 120.20 $ 164.49 $ 1,621.03 2000 $ 259.49 $ 129.81 $ 129.68 $ 1,491.22 2001 $ 259.49 $ 140.20 $ 119.30 $ 1,351.03 2002 $ 259.49 $ 151.41 $ 108.08 $ 1,199.61 2003 $ 259.49 $ 163.53 $ 95.97 $ 1,036.09 2004 $ 259.49 $ 176.61 $ 82.89 $ 859.48 2005 $ 259.49 $ 190.74 $ 68.76 $ 668.74 2006 $ 259.49 $ 206.00 $ 53.50 $ 462.75 2007 $ 259.49 $ 222.47 $ 37.02 $ 240.27 2008 $ 259.49 $ 240.27 $ 19.22 $ 0.00 $ 2,620.13 Total Scheduled Payment 260089as I ASSESSMENT SCHEDULE Constant Annual Payment Method Project: PARKVIEW ADDITION Lot: Project 260089M (0583) Block: Parcel: 23- 31 -22 -23 -0051 Addition: Owner: St. Genevieve Church Interest Start Date August 26, 1998 Repayment Period 10 yrs Interest Rate: 8.00% Assessments: unit Measure Unit Price Amoun Watermain Improvements LS $13,279.36 $13,279.36 YEAR SCHEDULED PRINCIPAL INTEREST PRINCIPAL PAYMENT PAYMENT PAYMENT REMAINING 1998 $ - $ - $ - $ 13,279.36 1999 $ 2,171.11 $ 916.67 $ 1,254.44 $ 12,362.69 2000 $ 1,979.02 $ 990.00 $ 989.02 $ 11,372.69 2001 $ 1,979.02 $ 1,069.20 $ 909.82 $ 10,303.49 2002 $ 1,979.02 $ 1,154.74 $ 824.28 $ 9,148.75 2003 $ 1,979.02 $ 1,247.12 $ 731.90 $ 7,901.64 2004 $ 1,979.02 $ 1,346.89 $ 632.13 $ 6,554.75 2005 $ 1,979.02 $ 1,454.64 $ 524.38 $ 5,100.12 2006 $ 1,979.02 $ 1,571.01 $ 408.01 $ 3,529.11 2007 $ 1,979.02 $ 1,696.69 $ 282.33 $ 1,832.42 2008 $ 1,979.02 $ 1,832.42 $ 146.59 $ 0.00 $ 19,982.26 Total Scheduled Payment 260089as 2 ASSESSMENT SCHEDULE Constant Annual Payment Method Project: PARKVIEW ADDITION Lot: Project 260089M (0583) Block: Parcel: 23- 31- 22 -24- -0008 Addition: Owner: Richard Thompson Interest Start Date August 26, 1998 Repayment Period 10 yrs Interest Rate: 8.00% Assessments Unit Measure Unit Pri Amount Watermain Improvements LS 1,741.23 $ 1,741.23 YEAR SCHEDULED PRINCIPAL INTEREST PRINCIPAL PAYMENT PAYMENT PAYMENT REMAINING 1998 $ - $ - $ - $ 1,741.23 1999 $ 284.68 $ 120.20 $ 164.49 $ 1,621.03 2000 $ 259.49 $ 129.81 $ 129.68 $ 1,491.22 2001 $ 259.49 $ 140.20 $ 119.30 $ 1,351.03 2002 $ 259.49 $ 151.41 $ 108.08 $ 1,199.61 2003 $ 259.49 $ 163.53 $ 95.97 $ 1,036.09 2004 $ 259.49 $ 176.61 $ 82.89 $ 859.48 2005 $ 259.49 $ 190.74 $ 68.76 $ 668.74 2006 $ 259.49 $ 206.00 $ 53.50 $ 462.75 2007 $ 259.49 $ 222.47 $ 37.02 $ 240.27 2008 $ 259.49 $ 240.27 $ 19.22 $ 0.00 $ 2,620.13 Total Scheduled Payment 260089as 3 ASSESSMENT SCHEDULE Constant Annual Payment Method Project: PARKVIEW ADDITION Lot: Project 260089M (0583) Block: Parcel: 23- 31 -22 -32 -0008 Addition: Owner: John and Cindy Rieder Interest Start Date August 26, 1998 Repayment Period 10 yrs Interest Rate: 8.00% Assessments: Unit Measure Unit Price Amount Watermain Improvements LS 1,741.23 $ 1,741.23 YEAR SCHEDULED PRINCIPAL INTEREST PRINCIPAL PAYMENT PAYMENT PAYMENT REMAINING 1998 $ - $ - $ - $ 1,741.23 1999 $ 284.68 $ 120.20 $ 164.49 $ 1,621.03 2000 $ 259,49 $ 129.81 $ 129.68 $ 1,491.22 2001 $ 259.49 $ 140.20 $ 119.30 $ 1,351.03 2002 $ 259.49 $ 151.41 $ 108.08 $ 1,199.61 2003 $ 259.4.9 $ 163.53 $ 95.97 $ 1,036.09 2004 $ 259.49 $ 176.61 $ 82.89 $ 859.48 2005 $ 259.49 $ 190.74 $ 68.76 $ 668.74 2006 $ 259.49 $ 206.00 $ 53.50 $ 462.75 2007 $ 259.49 $ 222.47 $ 37.02 $ 240.27 2008 $ 259.49 $ 240.27 $ 19.22 $ 0.00 $ 2,620.13 Total Scheduled Payment 260089as 4 ASSESSMENT SCHEDULE Constant Annual Payment Method Project: PARKVIEW ADDITION Lot: Project 260089M (0583) Block: Parcel: 23- 31 -22 -32 -0007 Addition: Owner: Dean Anderson Interest Start Date August 26, 1998 Repayment Period 10 yrs Interest Rate: 8.00% Assessments: Unit Measure Uni Price Amount Watermain Improvements LS 1,741.23 $ 1,741.23 YEAR SCHEDULED PRIN IPAL INTEREST PRINCIPAL PAYMENT PAYMENT PAYMENT REMAINING 1998 $ - $ - $ - $ 1,741.23 1999 $ 284.68 $ 120.20 $ 164.49 $ 1,621.03 2000 $ 259.49 $ 129.81 $ 129.68 $ 1,491.22 2001 $ 259.49 $ 140.20 $ 119.30 $ 1,351.03 2002 $ 259.49 $ 151.41 $ 108.08 $ 1,199.61 2003 $ 259.49 $ 163.53 $ 95.97 $ 1,036.09 2004 $ 259.49 $ 176.61 $ 82.89 $ 859.48 2005 $ 259.49 $ 190.74 $ 68.76 $ 668.74 2006 $ 259.49 $ 206.00 $ 53.50 $ 462.75 2007 $ 259.49 $ 222.47 $ 37.02 $ 240.27 2008 $ 259.49 $ 240.27 $ 19.22 $ 0.00 $ 2,620.13 Total Scheduled Payment 260089as 5 ASSESSMENT SCHEDULE Constant Annual Payment Method Project: PARKVIEW ADDITION Lot: Project 260089M (0583) Block: Parcel: 23- 31 -22 -32 -0017 Addition: Owner: Robert Barett Interest Start Date August 26, 1998 Repayment Period 10 yrs Interest Rate: 8.00% Assessments Unit Measure Unit Pri Amount Watermain Improvements LS 1,741.23 $ 1,741.23 YEAR SCHEDULED PRINCIPAL INTEREST PRINCIPAL PAYMENT PAYMENT PAYMENT REMAINING 1998 $ - $ - $ - $ 1,741.23 1999 $ 284.68 $ 120.20 $ 164.49 $ 1,621.03 2000 $ 259.49 $ 129.81 $ 129.68 $ 1,491.22 2001 $ 259.49 $ 140.20 $ 119.30 $ 1,351.03 2002 $ 259.49 $ 151.41 $ 108.08 $ 1,199.61 2003 $ 259.49 $ 163.53 $ 95.97 $ 1,036.09 2004 $ 259.49 $ 176.61 $ 82.89 $ 859.48 2005 $ 259.49 $ 190.74 $ 68.76 $ 668.74 2006 $ 259.49 $ 206.00 $ 53.50 $ 462.75 2007 $ 259.49 $ 222.47 $ 37.02 $ 240.27 2008 $ 259.49 $ 240.27 $ 19.22 $ 0.00 $ 2,620.13 Total Scheduled Payment 260089as 6 ASSESSMENT SCHEDULE Constant Annual Payment Method Project: PARKVIEW ADDITION Lot: Project 260089M (0583) Block: Parcel: 23- 31 -22 -32 -0039 Addition: Owner: Stan Hasiak Interest Start Date August 26, 1998 Repayment Period 10 yrs Interest Rate: 8.00% Assessments Unit Measure Unit Pry Amount Watermain Improvements LS 1,741.23 $ 1,741.23 YEAR SCHEDULED PRIN IPAL INTEREST PRINCIPAL PAYMENT PAYMENT PAYMENT REMAINING 1998 $ - $ - $ - $ 1 ,741.23 1999 $ 284.68 $ 120.20 $ 164.49 $ 1,621.03 2000 $ 259.49 $ 129.81 $ 129.68 $ 1,491.22 2001 $ 259.49 $ 140.20 $ 119.30 $ 1,351.03 2002 $ 259.49 $ 151.41 $ 108.08 $ 1,199.61 2003 $ 259.49 $ 163.53 $ 95.97 $ 1,036.09 2004 $ 259.49 $ 176.61 $ 82.89 $ 859.48 2005 $ 259.49 $ 190.74 $ 68.76 $ 668.74 2006 $ 259.49 $ 206.00 $ 53.50 $ 462.75 2007 $ 259.49 $ 222.47 $ 37.02 $ 240.27 2008 $ 259.49 $ 240.27 $ 19.22 $ 0.00 $ 2,620.13 Total Scheduled Payment 260089as 7 ASSESSMENT SCHEDULE Constant Annual Payment Method Project: PARKVIEW ADDITION Lot: Project 260089M (0583) Block: Parcel: Addition: Owner: Stan Hasiak Interest Start Date August 26, 1998 Repayment Period 10 yrs Interest Rate: 8.00% Assessments Unit Measure Unit Price Amount Municipal Improvements LS 12,389.99 $ 12,389.99 YEAR SCHEDULED PRINCIPAL INTEREST PRINCIPAL PAYMENT PAYMENT PAYMENT REMAINING 1998 $ - $ - $ - $ 12,389.99 1999 $ 2,025.70 $ 855.27 $ 1,170.43 $ 11,534.72 2000 $ 1,846.47 $ 923.70 $ 922.78 $ 10,611.02 2001 $ 1,846.47 $ 997.59 $ 848.88 $ 9,613.43 2002 $ 1,846.47 $ 1,077.40 $ 769.07 $ 8,536.03 2003 $ 1,846.47 $ 1,163.59 $ 682.88 $ 7,372.43 2004 $ 1,846.47 $ 1,256.68 $ 589.79 $ 6,115.76 2005 $ 1,846.47 $ 1,357.21 $ 489.26 $ 4,758.54 2006 $ 1,846.47 $ 1,465.79 $ 380.68 $ 3,292.75 2007 $ 1,846.47 $ 1,583.05 $ 263.42 $ 1,709.70 2008 $ 1,846.47 $ 1,709.70 $ 136.78 $ 0.00 $ 18,643.97 Total Scheduled Payment 260089as 8 ASSESSMENT SCHEDULE Constant Annual Payment Method Project: PARKVIEW ADDITION Lot: 1 Project 260089M (0583) Block: 1 Parcel: Addition: Parkvi Owner: Rick Carlson Interest Start Date August 26, 1998 Repayment Period 10 yrs Interest Rate: 8.00% Assessments: Unit Measure Unit Pri Amount Municipal Improvements LS 12,389.99 $ 12,389.99 YEAR SCHEDULED PRINCIPAL INTEREST PRINCIPAL PAYMENT PAYMENT PAYMENT REMAINING 1998 $ - $ - $ - $ 12,389.99 1999 $ 2,025.70 $ 855.27 $ 1,170.43 $ 11,534.72 2000 $ 1,846.47 $ 923.70 $ 922.78 $ 10,611.02 2001 $ 1,846.47 $ 997.59 $ 848.88 $ 9,613.43 2002 $ 1,846.47 $ 1,077.40 $ 769.07 $ 8,536.03 2003 $ 1,846.47 $ 1,163.59 $ 682.88 $ 7,372.43 2004 $ 1,846.47 $ 1,256.68 $ 589.79 $ 6,115.76 2005 $ 1,846.47 $ 1,357.21 $ 489.26 $ 4,758.54 2006 $ 1,846.47 $ 1,465.79 $ 380.68 $ 3,292.75 2007 $ 1,846.47 $ 1,583.05 $ 263.42 $ 1,709.70 2008 $ 1,846.47 $ 1,709.70 $ 136.78 $ 0.00 $ 18,643.97 Total Scheduled Payment 260089as 9 Howard R, Green Company CONSULTING ENGINEERS terville .... astaA[inMS r&57 OTHER (NONASSESSMENT) COSTS Water Availability Charge (WAC): Water availability charges are the costs to connect to and become a part of the Centerville water system. This charge pays for the costs associated with water systems such as elevated storage, water treatment facilities, and maintenance. The WAC charge is $2800 per SAC unit. Sewer Availability Charge (SAC): Sewer availability charges are the costs to connect to and become a part of the Centerville sewer system. This charge pays for the costs associated with the sewer system, such as lift station rehabilitation and operation costs, sewer cleaning, and system maintenance. The SAC charge is $1750 per SAC unit for the City of Centerville. The Metropolitan Council of Environmental Services also issues a SAC charge. This charge is $1000 per SAC unit. Property Owner Costs: The individual property owner will be responsible for the connection between the property line and the individual building. Because of the many different configurations, this cost varies considerably, and is difficult to estimate. Property owners may also have costs associated with taking individual well systems and septic systems out of service. The current City Ordinance requires property owners to connect to the sewer once sewer service is available. Property owners must connect to the water system once a private well system is in need of repair. 260089M- assessment. hea ring. doc Howard R. Green Company CONSULTING ENGINEERS t8?'Z12ilr? ... 8etahtvW 1657 OTHER(NONASSESSMENT)COSTS Water Availability Charge (WAC): Water availability charges are the costs to connect to and become a part of the Centerville water system. This charge pays for the costs associated with water systems such as elevated storage, water treatment facilities, and maintenance. For Commercial properties, the WAC charge is $2,800 per SAC unit. For Residential properties, the WAC charge is $1,300 per connection. Sewer Availability Charge (SAC): Sewer availability charges are the costs to connect to and become a part of the Centerville sewer system. This charge pays for the costs associated with the sewer system, such as lift station rehabilitation and operation costs, sewer cleaning, and system maintenance. The SAC charge is $1750 per SAC unit for the City of Centerville. The Metropolitan Council of Environmental Services also issues a SAC charge. This charge is $1000 per SAC unit. Property Owner Costs: The individual property owner will be responsible for the connection between the property line and the individual building. Because of the many different configurations, this cost varies considerably, and is difficult to estimate. Property owners may also have costs associated with taking individual well systems and septic systems out of service. The current City Ordinance requires property owners to connect to the sewer once sewer service is available. Property owners must connect to the water system once a private well system is in need of repair. 260089M- assessment. hearing.doc . Howard R. Green Company r saw CONSULTING ENGINEERS ', te?*y2llg SstaMiMei 1859 CITY OF CENTERVILLE ASSESSMENT HEARING Parkview Addition Sanitary Sewer, Watermain, Street, and Storm Sewer Improvements August 26, 1998 Centerville Council Chambers Tom Wilharber, Mayor Sanna Buckbee, Council Member Mary Jo Helmbrecht, Council Member Theresa Brenner, Council Member Laura Powers, Council Member Jim March, Administrator Ry -Chel Gaustad, City Clerk David Nyberg, City Engineer 260089M- assessment. hearing.doc Howard R. Green Company 6 & terville CONSULTING ENGINEERS sweat WW4 rear AGENDA I. CALL TO ORDER II. PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS Ill. PROJECT COST IV. PROJECT SCHEDULE V. PROPOSED ASSESSMENTS VI. PROPERTY OWNER QUESTIONS AND COMMENTS VII. ADJOURN 260089M- assessment. hearing. doc Howard R. Green Company CONSULTING ENGINEERS " ♦ teryill sarewn� rasr PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS • Street with Curb and Gutter • Storm Sewer • Lateral Sanitary Sewer & Watermain • Individual Services • Hydrants • Erosion Control • Watermain Along Centerville Road • Trunk Watermain • Hydrants • Services • Turf Restoration • Sodding • Seeding 260089M- assessment. hearing. doc Howard R, Green Company _ CONSULTING ENGINEERS te"U2lLe s90181wW rasp TOTAL PROJECT COSTS Site Work $15,727.50 Street $185,920.00 Bituminous Trail $4,857.50 Storm Sewer $54,535.00 Watermain $121,841.00 Sanitary Sewer $61,398.00 TOTAL PROJECT COST $444,279.00 ALTERNATES Eagle Pass Connection $27,692,50 Drain Tile Alternate $23,229.00 Sub -Total $50,921.50 TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COST $495 5 200.50 Overhead (30 %) $148 TOTAL PROJECT COST $643,760.65 260089M -a ssessme nt. he a ring.d oc Howard R, Green Company CONSULTING ENGINEERS te ille aawuw�a test PROJECT SCHEDULE Review Draft Feasibility Study March 11, 1998 Receive Final Feasibility Study March 25, 1997 Public Hearing April 22, 1997 Plan Approval and Order Advertisement May 27, 1998 for Bids Bid Opening July 14, 1998 Project Awarded, Notice to Proceed August 24, 1998 Public Hearing and Assessment Hearing August 26, 1998 Begin Construction August 1998 Complete Construction October 1998 260089 M- assessme nt. hearing.doo Howard R, Green Company CONSULTING ENGINEERS Formerly MSA Consulting Engineers August 26, 1998 File: 260094m -0071 Mr. Jim March City Administrator 1880 Main Street Centerville, MN 55038 RE: LAUIRIE LAMOTTE MEMORIAL PARK BID RESULTS Dear Mr. March: As you are aware, we opened bids yesterday for the Laurie Lamotte Memorial Park project in Centerville. We have attached a complete summary of the bid results to this correspondence. Below is a summary of the base bid results: Forest Lake Contracting $153,227.90 Dresel Contracting $186.299.00 Glenn Rehbein Excavating $191,077.45 Lakeland Nurseries $315,303.00 We talked to a representative from Forest Lake Contracting after the bid opening. They have resources available immediately to begin work on the project if the Council is prepared to award the project. There are several items that need attention on this project. We have outlined these below: • An electrical power cut for the well needs to be completed. The City should consider reinstallation of the meter for the well on the wall of the building at the park. • The City of Centerville should consider lighting for the proposed parking area. The City would enter into an agreement with NSP on this work. It would be important to determine the locations of the light standards prior to final grading of the parking lot. • The small storage shed on the west side of the building should be moved and disposed of if necessary by the City. There are a number of other smaller site work items that should also be addressed such as whether or not to salvage any of the parking lot aggregate, and removing items on the site such as garbage cans, foul posts, and the snow fence. We will continue to coordinate these efforts with the City Public Works staff. 11 SPNWFSIVOLIIDATA \PROJ�260094m100711094 -2609. aug.doc 1326 Energy Park Drive • St. Paul, MN 55108 • 612/644 -4389 fax 612/644 -9446 toll free 888/368 -4389 A Mr. Jim March August 26, 1998 Page 2 Total overhead expenditures to date on this project are $15,895 including the $5895 previously authorized earlier this summer for completion of the plans and specs and bidding the project. Additional overhead expenditures for construction staking, utility coordination, construction administration, and construction inspection are estimated to cost $18,000. We also recommend budgeting a contingency fund of $20,000 for a project of this scope and cost. Total overhead for budgeting purposes is therefore $53,895. We will be in attendance at the August 26` City Council meeting to discuss this important project with you. Sincerely, owar Green Company f � David E. Nyberg, P.E. Project Manager DEN /st Enclosures cc: Mr. Paul Palzer, Centerville Public Works Mr. Clyde Chase, Howard R. Green Company Howard R. Green Company \1SPNWFS5VOL1\ DATA \PROJ\260094m' 6pl i .ONGI BID TABULATION PROJECT: LAURIE LAMOTTE MEMORIAL PARK (260094M) OWNER, CITY OF CENTERVILLE. MINNESOTA OPENING DATE: AUGUST 25, 1998 ENGINEER: HOWARD R. GREEN COMPANY SYE65 s A'TEAl ORSC'BAPTIDSf{ s r i FTN1E&'A'SdKM, fpF4'Jiir � � tS9 i ..OLRNNAEISBFlN SX(<'1= z _ (y1k>W+tNRNU1LS5.kIPH iz . `� PRICS TATh>.PRtCG:, ��t +Tbru.PacB ScIlmi1F I O CRAOINC FROS,10NrON ' I MOBILIZATION IS 1 $7,000.00 $7,OW.W $25,000.00 525,000.00 $19,000.00 519,000.00 $72,144.90 572,144.W 2 COMMON EXCAVATION IS 1 $45,0W.W I45,OW.00 $60,000.00 160,000.00 $66,IW.00 566,10100 163.000.00 S3,OW.W 3 MUCK EXCAVATION(EV) CY IOW 52.00 $2,000.00 $4.W 14,000.00 $2.75 123M.00 $1.00 18.000.00 4 CLEAR &GRUB AC 0.5 $3,8W.W $1,900.W $6.000.00 53.000.00 14,000.0) $2,000.00 51,000.00 1500.00 5 REMOVE EXISTING BITUMINOUS SURFACE(?) SY 216 $2.00 M32.00 $3.50 5756.00 $2 .70 $583.20 53.00 $WB.W 6 REMOVE EXISTING CONCRETE SIDEWALK (P) SY 19 14.00 $76.00 54.m $76.00 54.00 $76.W 120.0) $381100 7 REMOVE EXISTING CULVERTS EA 2 $300.00 $600.00 5150.00 $3W.00 SI00.W $200.00 1310.00 $620.00 8 REMOVE It SALVAGE EXISTING AGGREGATE (P) CY 314 $4.8S $1,522.90 $4.W $1,256.00 $6.50 $2,0U.W $4.00 $1,256.W 9 REMOVE& SALVAGE EXISTING LIME AGGREGATE( CY 184 $2.50 $4W.00 $4.00 $136.00 $2.50 $4W.W $5.50 $1,012.00 10 SILT FENCE LF 12M $).75 $2,IW.0D $2.00 $2,400.00 12.50 53,000.00 $4.00 $4,800,00 II BALE CHECKS EA 45 $5.00 $225.00 $7.00 $315.00 M2.00 $540.00 $266.00 $11,970.00 12 TIMBER CHECK DAMS EA 9 1300.00 12,700.00 11,000.00 $9,000.00 5150.00 $1,350.00 $2,000.00 $18,000.00 13 TEMPORARY ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE (P) SY 45 $7.00 $315.00 $IB.W $810.00 $20.00 $900.00 114.00 $630.00 14 RIPRAP (CLASS III ) CY 8 $65,W 1520.00 $100.00 SEW.W $42.00 936.00 168.00 $544.00 T SCIIEDUIE 1.0 GRADING A, EROSION CONTROL -TOTAL $64,550.90 $108,449.00 $99.39.20 $123,5W.W SCHEnID E 2.0 PARKING AREA 154PRGVFMFNTC 1 MODIFIED SELECT GRANULAR BORROW (P) CY 3530 $9.25 $32,652.50 $7.30 526,475.0) SIO.30 $36,359.00 $18.00 $63,540.00 2 CUSS 5 AGGREGATE BASE TN 1805 $6.00 $10,130.00 $9.00 116,245.00 $8.45 $15,252.25 $27.00 $48.735.00 3 ADJUST SANITARY SEWER CLEANOUT COVERS EA 3 1130.00 1390.00 $150.00 $450.00 $150.00 $4SD.00 5600.00 5LIJW.W 4 PERFORATED THERMOPLASTIC DRAIN PIPE 4 WITH TYPE I GEOTEXTILE SOCK LF 1500 $3.25 $4,875.00 $6.50 59,750.00 JILTS $2,615.W $1.00 $12,000.00 5 4' THERMOPLASTIC GRAIN PIPE IF 750 $3.25 $2,437.50 $6.00 M -5W.00 $3.00 $2,250.W S1I.W 3$80.00 T SCHEDULE 2.0 PARKING AREA IMPROVE6IENTS -TOTAL $51,185.00 157,42100 556,936.25 $134,325.00 �:In�oil'Nrr9amx26m94M P , �,. , 1 1 ITEAS f uTaa$ux��en5rr�$71� ��� in i���'lr+a �r55�i5asix . �_r zia 5E93a TkatrrRtesea iDU mice '> n[ce TOTALAL tA)C>s . .: .... ..: _.:� ...... ..,.; _:,..., .......... .151 .;:.:! SCHEDLI F 3_0 TURF F_STA R11SI f61 ENT 1 SEEDING(ATHLEfIC TURF MIX) (P) AC 4.3 $2.400.0) $10,320.00 $1,100.00 $4,730.00 $2,800.W $12,040.0) $3,363.00 $14460.90 2 SEEDING AC 11.6 $1,700.00 $19,720.00 SS50.00 $6,380.0) $8W.00 $9,280.00 $2,394.00 $27,770.40 3 TYPE 5 WOOD CELLULOS E MU LCI I(ATH LETIC FIELD AC 4.3 56X).0) $2,580.0) $600.W $2,580.00 $750.00 $3,225.0) $318.00 $1,367.40 4 MULCHING AC 11.6 $170.00 31,972.00 $400.0) $4,640.00 360).00 $6,960.00 5334.00 $3,874.40 5 WOOD FIBER BLANKET s 20)0 SI.3U $200.00 $1.05 $2,I0D.00 $1.65 $3,300.00 SS.W $10,0W.W T SCHEDULE 3.0 TURF ESTABLISI NI ENT -TOTAL $37,192.00 $20,430.00 $34.805.00 557,473.10 BID SUMMARY SCHEDULE 1.0 GRADING B EROSION CONTROL - TOTAL 564,850.90 $108,449.00 $99,336.20 $123,$01.90 SCHEDULE 2.0 PARKING AREA IMPROVEMENTS -TOTAL $51,185.0) $57,420.00 $56,936.25 M54,325.10 SCHEDULE 3.0 TURF ESTAELISHMENT - TOTAL S3],192.0) $20,410.0) 534,805.0) 55],4]3.10 TOTAL BASE BID $153,227.90 5186,299.00 S191,0]7.45 S315.M3.00 1 REMOVE EXCESS SOIL FROM SITE LS 1 $I3,X)O.X) $13,(X0.0) $1000).00 $10,000.00 S12.5W.W S12.5W.W $3,175.00 53,17S.W T BIDAL7ERNATEA REBIOVAL OF EXCESS SOIL FROM SITE - TOTAL S13,6W.00 $10,000.00 $12,50).00 $3.175.00 HOCKEY RANK IMPROVEMENTS 1 SUBGRADE EXCAVATION FOR RINK (P) CY 708 SLm $1,132.80 S].W $4,956.W $235 $1,593.00 $6.00 $4.24B.00 2 MODIFIED SELECT GRANULAR BORROW (P) CY 600 51 I.0) $6,6X).00 $8.50 $5,1W.W $17.35 $10,410.03 $11.00 $6,600.W 4' PERFORATED THERMOPLASTIC DRAIN PIPE 3 WITH TYPE I GEOTEXTILE SOCK LF 526 $3.75 51,972.50 $6.50 $3,419.00 $2.35 51,23610 $6.50 $3,419.00 4 4' THERMOPLASTIC DRAIN PIPE LF W 53.75 $225.W $6.0) $360.W $S.0) $m.X) $7,0) S420.W Y THICK. 40 PSI TONGUE & GROOVE EXTRUDED 5 POLYSTYRENE INSULATION BOARD (P) SF 1620) $I.0) 516,20),00 $1.75 $28,350.00 $1.05 $17.010.W $2.00 S32,400.W 6 INSTALL HOCKEY RINK BOARD POSTS IS 1 $2.600.00 $2,60).00 $4,0)3.0) S4.".W S7,130.W !7,130.00 $29,750.00 520,750.00 7 REMOVE& INSTALL PENALTY BOXES LS I SI6,OW.W $10,00).00 SI,500.00 $1,500.00 $7,250.W $7,250.W S2,975.W $2,875.W n: %pmj1260094m @600946! PAGE 7 +arp4 r. � 1 ; Flo a s � s fn�rF : X1'4` ur+ttre>BtC�e ..�'�rcA� F � $ ���4+lr�l� 'uwx2mrce C, ter�tt�irr�usswv>�s .: .. .:.." .:: .._..., ...... ,.,..• .a:dttry .. :'ii} .:.:.:> 117 :.: > <> {$t - •., BALL FIELD IMPROVEMENTS B REMOVE& SALVAGE EXISTING BLEACHERS EA 2 $200.W $".Do $1,000.00 $2,000,00 $350.00 S7W.W $1,000.00 REMOVE & SALVAGE EXISTING BACKSTOPS, $2.000.00 9 FENCES, BENCHES. AND FOUL POSTS EA 2 $1,000.00 $2,000.00 $2000.00 54,000.00 5950.00 $1,9W,W $1,000.00 $2.000.W 10 BALL DIAMOND AGGREGATE INFIELD EA 3 56,400.00 $19,2W.00 $3,500.W SI0,500.W 55.100.00 $15,300.00 $3,273.00 $9.BI9.W II BACKSTOP EA 3 $2,8W.W $8,4W.W $2,600.00 $7,500.00 52,750.00 $8,250.00 S3,0W.W $9Xw.W 12 INFIELD FENCE (P) LF 210 $28.00 $5,880.00 521.00 $5,670.W $28.W $5,880.00 $J 1.00 16,510.00 13 PLAYERS BENCIIES EA 6 5800.00 $4,8W.00 $500.0) $3,000.00 $1,150.00 16,900.00 $878.00 S5,2611.00 14 FOUL POSTS EA 6 S1,BW.W $10,800.00 $800.00 $4,800.W $4W.00 $2,940.00 f 173.00 $1050.00 IS CONCRETE MAINTENANCE EDGER (P) LF 330 $IO.W $3,700.00 $25.00 $8,250.00 57.35 52,425.50 513.00 N ?0).00 16 BASES, HOME PLATE, PITCHING RUBBER SETS 3 $700.00 S2,I0(kW 1500.00 $1,500.00 $385.00 $1,155.00 $1,375.00 S4,125.0() OTHER 17 RECONNECT WATER SERVICE IS 1 $3SO.00 S350.W S60D.W fb00.00 $750.00 $750.00 $1,875.00 S1875.00 18 2 COPPER SERVICE PIPE LF 125 $21.00 $2,625.00 $20.00 S2,500.00 $15.00 $1,875.00 $IO.W S1,250.1M) 19 REMOVE TIMBER POSTS LA 62 $B.W 3496.00 $10.00 5620.03 $14.W S868.W $90,00 f53$000 20 REMOVE LIGHTING POLE FOUNDATIONS EA 2 1300.00 $600.00 5300.00 $600.00 $175.00 $350.00 $500,W $1,000.00 21 TOPSOIL BORROW (CV) CY 3W $10.01 $3,W3.00 12.00 $600.00 3ILW 33,600.00 $500,W $ W 22 SOD SY 500 $2.00 $1,000.0) $1.30 $650.00 $3.00 $1,500.00 ,800. 23 GRADE I COMPOST CY 200 $45.00 $4.W $2,00.00 $9,000.00 $4.00 $800.00 550.00 $10,000.00 115.00 $3,000.00 24 GRADE If COMPOST CY 500 $18.00 S9,000.0D $4.00 $2,000,00 $20.00 $10,000.00 $19.00 19,5W.W T BID ALTERNATIVE B RECREATIONAL FACILITIES &REMOVALS - TOTAL $121,684.30 $103,575.W $119,322.W $154,779.00 1 TYPE 4IA, WEAR COURSE MIXTURE TN 430 $32.00 $13,760.00 $29.50 $12,685.00 $32.75 $14,082.50 $34.00 $14,620.W 2 TYPE 31 B. BASE COURSE MIXTURE TN 430 $31.00 $13,330.00 $31.75 $13,652.50 $31.50 $13,545.00 $44.00 $18,920.00 3 BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR TACK COAT GAL 200 $1.50 1390.00 $1.50 $300.00 $1.50 $390.00 $2.W S5J0.00 4 8612 CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER LF 965 $10.00 $9.650.W $10.00 59,650.00 $9.45 $8,154.25 $15.00 S14,475.W DID ALTERNATE C PAVEMENT AND CURB &GUTTER - TOTAL. $37,130.00 $36,377.50 $36,171.75 $48,535.W I REREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS AN ACCURATE TABULATION OF TI IL BIDS RECLIVF UGUST D FOR THE ABOVE MENTIONED PROIECT. AVI . NYBERG, P.E. 25, 1998 MN REG. NO.: 23801 n:lPmj1260091m\260D94b1 PAGE 3 LAMOTTF. A K POT NT A D Yti EMENT F ND Park Dedication Fund = Year end 12/31/97 $108,829 Lakeland Hills $ 30,000 Park $ 31,500 Woods ofCW $ 7,500 $177,829 Tax Increment Funds $226,046 MEMO DATE : August 21, 1998 TO : Honorable Mayor and Council FROM: Jim March RE Appearance of Kristin Hanson, Ehlers and Associates Kristin Hanson from Ehlers and Associates will be present to discuss the bonding for the Parkview development. As you may recall, the Council rejected all bids for bonds for this project at the Council meeting on August 12. The financial advisor was instructed to negotiate interest rates with the apparent low bidder and bring the results back to the City Council on August 26. City Council Workshop Minutes August 19, 1998 Present: Wilharber, Brenner, Helmbrecht, Powers Absent: Buckbee Staff Jim March, City Administrator Paul Palzer, PW Director, Building Official Meeting was called to order at 5:00 by Mayor Wilharber. Discussion occurred on the status of the Barett home on the senior housing site. Mayor Wilharber mentioned that he had spoke to Violet Barett and she was not upset about the fact that the house needs to be removed. Mr. March indicated that Bonine Construction phoned City Hall on the morning of August 13, 1998 to indicate that they had made an error on their written quote. The price to demolish the house was supposed to be $5500, not $3500. The Council consensus was that the price was still half of the next lowest quote and the work should proceed. Discussion occurred on the Parkview development. The main item of consideration was the house site formerly owned by Dan Tourville. The Council had indicated at the meeting of August 13, 1998 that the street and utility assessment for the lot now owned by (Hasaik's) should be deferred indefinitely, until the property owner decides to split the lot. The same consideration was also to be granted to the property owned by Sievert's in the Acorn Creek subdivision. City Attorney Jim Hoeft indicated that the practice of deferring assessment's indefinitely is not an allowable practice. Council indicated that they would like to defer the assessment for a period of ten years and then also extend the assessments on the Sievert property for an additional five years. This item will be officially approved at the next Council meeting. Mayor Wilharber asked City Attorney Hoeft how the prosecutions would work during the transition of City Attorneys. City Attorney Hoeft indicated that he did not foresee any problems and that he would be in contact with former Attorney Hellings to coordinate the transition. City Attorney Hoeft is going to be making contact with the Circle Pines/Lexington Police Department to introduce himself Mr. Hoeft indicated that he would be splitting prosecution responsibilities with another Attorney in their firm (Greg Herrick). Discussion occurred on the topic of the engineering consultant interviews. Each Council member relayed their individual point scores on each of the engineering firms based on the firm's answers to the questions during the interview process. The point total for each firm was as follows: BRW (229) , Bolton and Menk (200), Bonestroo (255) and HR Green (206). Discussion occurred on the problems associated with the Eagle Pass and Parkview development. It was mentioned that problems will occur with any engineering firm, but the key issue is how the firm tends to deal with their mistakes. The consensus was that the firm of Bonestroo, Rosene, Anderlik and Associates was worth investigating more closely. Staff was asked to contact Bonestroo to investigate their thoughts on stepping in to the various projects that were pending and on -going within the City. Staff was also asked to develop a fist of projects that the City is facing as well as the status of current projects. Staff was asked to investigate the satisfaction of Arden Hills with their selection of Bonestroo as consulting engineer. Staff will provide the information to the City Council prior to the regular meeting on August 26, The City Council will take official action on selecting a consulting engineer at the meeting on August 26. The flashing lights for the school cross -walk was discussed. Mr. March indicated that a meeting was held with representatives from the school, Anoka County and the engineering firm of WSB. The result of the school crossing report was reviewed at the meeting. The report indicated that warrants were not met for a flashing beacon system for the crosswalk. Mr. March indicated that the City would have to work in conjunction with the school district to hire an engineering firm to design the lights and then hire a firm to install the lights. The total cost is estimated at $12,000. The consensus was to proceed with the project to have the lights installed as soon as possible. The County will be making signage improvements in the area prior to the start of school. It was mentioned that County Commissioner Langfeld should be invited to a future meeting to discuss this issue. The 1999 budget was discussed. It was noted that a levy of at least $700,000 would be needed to cover the increased costs from going to 24 hour police protection. It was noted that it is important for the Council members to be present at the police budget workshop on August 24, 1998. A workshop was scheduled for September 2, 1998 at 6:00 to further work on refining the budget so that the initial levy amount can be certified prior to September 15. The City web site was briefly discussed. The consensus was to proceed with launching the web site. The City would have to pay $175 to register a domain name for two years. The City would then pay $50 per month to have the site hosted with the ability to update the site on a regular basis. It was mentioned that no home addresses or phone numbers should be included on the web site. Mayor Wilharber indicated that the interviews had been held for the position of Circle- Pines/Lexington Police Chief. A motion was made by Laura Powers, seconded by Mary Jo Helmbrecht to adjourn the meeting at 8:30 P.M. Motion carried unanimously. Respectfully submitted, Jim March City Administrator DATE: August 18, 1998 TO: City Council City of Circle Pines City Council City of Centerville City Council City of Lino Lakes FROM: Milo Bennett SUBJECT: Ratification of ex and approval for payment of August expenses. Your approval of August expenses as listed on the attached copy of the check register, checks #9633 - 9668, in the amount of $21,359.64 is hereby requested. MB /nw cc: 7 Circle Pines City Council 7 Centerville City Council 7 Lino Lakes City Council 2 File 08/18/98 at.02:35PM CENTENNIAL FIRE DISTRICT PAGE 1 BANK CHECK REGISTER Checking account 08/18/98 TO 08/18/98 CHECK NO DATE TYPE PAID TO / DESCRIPTION CHECK AMOUNT — ---- --^~----- ---- ----------^^------------------- ------------ 9--6 08/18/98 AP—D BILLS RENTAL CENTER 223.34 23017 9634 08/18/98 AP—D CENTERVILLE FLORAL 75.00 A MCKENZIE 9635 08/18/98 AP—D CITY OF LINO LAKES 81.58 SAFETY CAMP 9636 08/18/98 AP—D MAPLE CHASE CO 2,136.96 500 SMOKE DETECTORS 9637 08/18/98 AP—D MlLO BENNETT 102.31 EXPENSES 9638 08/18/98 AP—D AlRTOUCH CELLULAR/BELLEVUE 342.62 1003-4396417 9639 08/18/98 AP—D MARK'S MEAT PRODUCTS 120"00 8@17 9640 08/18/98 AP—D ANOKA ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE 128.07 395649~210057 9p 08/18/98 AP—D PEHL, HINSCHBERGER ASSOCIATES 250.00 31277 9642 08/18/98 AP—D NORTHERN STATES POWER COMPANY 1,189"53 1589-648-494-215 9643 08/18/98 AP—D ANCOM COMMUNICATIONS, INC. 179.45 18974 9644 08/18/98 AP—D ROSS INDUSTRIES, INC 135.47 E89183 9645 08/18/98 AP—D FOOD~N~FUEL, INC. 8°50 10019 9646 08/18/98 AP—D DANKO EMERGENCY EQUIPMENT CO 23^67 283974 9647 08/18/98 AP—D US WEST COMMUNICATIONS 65.00 612 E@8~0790 032 9648 08/18/98 AP—D PAPERDIRECT, INC" 48,85 31851746001 9649 08/18/98 AP—D PHOTO WORLD 30"30 STMT 8-6-98 08/18/98 at 02:35PM CENTENNIAL FIRE DISTRICT PAGE 2 BANK CHECK [REGISTER Checking account 08/18/98 TO 08/18/98 CHECK NO DATE TYPE PAID TO / DESCRIPTION CHECK AMOUNT - - - -- -- - - - - -- - - -- --------- ----------------- - - -- -- ------ - - ---- 08/18/98 AP -D MINNEGASCO 49.98 583- 001 -881-700 9651 08/18/98 AP -D NORTHWAY IRRIGATION 146.67 1520 9652 08/18/98 AP -D TWIN CITY OXYGEN 236.93 0;;708 9653 08/18/98 AP -D OXYGEN SERVICE COMPANY, INC. 11:;.50 13 23'2, 133233, 133234 9654 08/18/98 AP -D DALE HAAPOJA 92.68 1048 9655 08/18/96 AP -D TOM THUMB 35.82 STMT 7 -26 -98 9656 08/18/98 AP -D FINA OIL & CHEMICAL COMPANY 177.48 STMT 7 -29 -98 9957 08/18/98 AP -D AIRTOUCH CELLULAR /BELLEVUE 17.81 1003 - 1052011 9 08/18/98 AP -D C.P. OFFICE PRODUCTS 117.49 2038 9659 08/18/98 AP -D LIGHTNING PRINTING 7:.90 109366 9660 08/18/98 AP -D EMERGENCY APPARATUS MAINT. 897.63 13044- 13220 -13176 9661 08/18/98 AP -D PAGING NETWORK OF MINNESOTA 53.32 064- A228314 9G6" 08/18/98 AP -D SEDGWICK 1.89.00 1. '97; =' •.3663 08/18/98 AP -D AT &T 13.75 016 345 5966 001 9664 08/18/98 AP -D AT &T 20.65 651- 784 -7472 9665 08/18/98 AP -D ARTHUR E MOHLER 29.63 EXPENSES 9666 08/18/98 AP -D CITY OF CIRCLE PINES 2,392.50 DEPRECIATION 08/18/98 at 02:35PM CENTENNIAL FIRE DISTRICT PAGE RANK CHECK REGISTER Checking account 08/18/98 TO 08/18/98 CHECK NO DATE TYPE RAID TO / DESCRIPTION CHECK AMOUNT - - - -- -- - - - - -- - - -- ------------------------ - - - - -- ------------ 9--7 08/18/98 AG -D CITY OF LINO LAKES 6,561.25 COMMON AREA CHGS 9668 08/18/98 AP -D CENTENNIAL RELIEF ASSOCIATION :1,000.00 RELIEF ASSOC TOTAL MANUAL CHECKS (M): 0.00 TOTAL COMPUTER CHECKS (C): 0.00 TOTAL DIRECT DISBURSEMENTS (D7: 21,359.64 TOTAL CHECKS: 21,359.E4 CITY OF CENTERVILLE COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION 98 -18 ADOPTING PARKVIEW ADDITION DEVELOPMENT ASSESSMENT ROLL WHEREAS, pursuant to proper notice duly given as required by law, the Council has met and heard and passed upon all objections to the proposed assessment for the improvement of Parkview Addition. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CENTERVILLE, MINNESOTA: 1. Such proposed assessment, a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part hereof, is hereby accepted and shall constitute the special assessment against the lands named therein, and each tract of land therein included is hereby found to be benefited by the proposed improvement in the amount of the assessment levied against it. 1 Such assessment shall be payable in equal annual installments extending over a period of years determined by the Council, the fast of the installments to be payable on or before the first Monday in January 1999, and shall bear interest at a rate percent per annum determined by the Council, from the date of the adoption of this assessment resolution. To the first installment shall be added interested on the entire assessment from the date of this resolution until December 31, 1998. To each subsequent installment when due s all be added interest for one year all unpaid installments. 3. The owner of any property so assessed may, at any time prior to certification of the assessment to the county auditor, pay the whole assessment on such property, with interest accrued to the date of payment, to the city treasurer, except that no interest shall be charged if the entire assessment is paid within 30 days from the adoption of this resolution, and he may at any time thereafter, pay to the city treasurer the entire amount of the assessment remaining unpaid, with interested accrued to December 31, of the year in which such payment is made. Such payment must be made before November 15, or interest will be charged through December 31, of the next succeeding year. 4. The clerk shall forthwith transmit a certified duplicate of this assessment to the county auditor to be extended on the property tax lists of the county. Such assessments shall be collected and paid over in the same manner as other municipal taxes. Adopted by the Council this 26 day of August, 1998, Thomas Wilharber, Mayor ATTEST: Ry -Chel Gaustad, CMC City Clerk Howard R, Green Company CONSULTING ENGINEERS rsetvtssesw�ts Formerly MSA Consulting Engineers MEMORANDUM To: Jim March, Administrator From: David E. Nyberg, P.E. Subject: WOODS OF CLEARWATER CREEK DEVELOPMENT PLANS File: 804080J -0240 Date: August 21, 1998 Attached to this memo please find a copy of a revised Developer's Agreement showing the change indicated at the Council meeting on August 12'". The change included requiring that the trees be balled and burlapped, installed as p rt of the development. Several minor changes have been and continue to be made to the plans, in coordination with Mr. Paul Palzer, Public Works Director. We hope to have preliminary engineering plans of the street and utilities prior to the August 26` Council meeting. We will present these at the Council meeting for your review only, to update you on the progress of this development. Grading of the site has started. The Developer applied for and received a grading permit from the City, and has also provided the necessary escrow for us to start the engineering street and utility plans. DEN /st Enclosure cc: Mr. Paul Palzer, Public Works Director O: \PROJ\804080j \02401080 -2105. a ug. d oc 1326 Energy Park Drive • St. Paul, MN 55108 • 612/644 -4389 fax 612/644 -9446 toll free 888/368 -4389 Woods of Clearwater Creek Development Agreement DRAFT August 21, 1998 DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT WOODS OF CLEARWATER CREEK CENTERVILLE, MINNESOTA (Developer Installed Improvements) THIS AGREEMENT, made this day of 1998, is by and between the City of Centerville, whose address is 1880 Main Street, Centerville, Minnesota 55038, a municipal corporation organized under the laws of the State of Minnesota, hereinafter referred to as the "City ", and Mr. Richard Travis, whose address is P.O. Box 533, Circle Pines, MN, hereinafter referred to as the "Developer ". WHEREAS, the Developer has received approval from the City Council for a preliminary plat of land within the corporate limits of the City known as Woods of Clearwater Creek, hereinafter called "Subdivision "; and WHEREAS, the Developer has applied to the City to be allowed at the Developer's expense to construct all surfaced streets, curb and gutter, required landscaping, storm sewer, stormwater ponds, drainage facilities, watermain and sanitary sewer facilities, hereinafter referred to as Street and Utility Improvements, and WHEREAS, the Developer is to be responsible for the installation and financing of certain private improvements within the plat, hereinafter referred to as Private Improvements; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises of the parties made herein, IT IS AGREED BY AND BETWEEN THE PARTIES HERETO: A. PRIVATE IMPROVEMENTS The Developer will construct and install at Developer's expense the general improvement construction according to ordinance 98, Section 38.01 and other improvements specific to the development herein set forth. 1. Cost of Private Improvements, description: a. Street name signs (installed by the City) approximately 1 a $250 /each $250 b. Traffic signs, stop sign, dead -end, etc. (installed by the City) approximately 2 @ $200 /each $400 C. Utility markers approximately 5 @ $200 $1,000 d. Street sweeping 3 each @ S600 /each $1,800 0 :`PROM04080j \080- 2401.june.D0c.- lead -doc Page l Woods of Clearwater Creek Development Agreement DRAFT August 21, 1998 e. Signage and barricades 1 each @ $200 /each $200 f Flushing of storm sewers, once per year until all lots are built upon $1,000 g. Street lights approximately 2 lights @ $500 /light $1,000 h. Shade trees (balled and burlapped) per lot or 2 per corner lot @ $300 each $3,000 i. Sod, 600 square yards per lot @ $2.00 /SY $12,000 j. Snowplow service of streets 20 @ $100 /plowing $2,000 k. City administration for review and compliance of above — 80 hours @ $30 /hour $2,400 Total Estimated Cost $25,050 Developer Retainage (150 %) $37,575 All of the above items under Section 1 with the exception of the trees and sod on unbuilt lots shall be completed and /or provided to the City by November 30, 1999. 2. Also included as items associated with the Private Improvements, the Developer shall undertake or arrange to accomplish the following: a. Site Development issues 1) Coordinate with the utility companies to provide for gas main, telephone lines, cable lines, and power lines to service the properties developed on the final plat according to the City's joint trench policy. 2) Provide seeding and vegetation maintenance and erosion control over denuded or graded areas and mitigation area, at the City's direction. 3) Reimburse the City for street name signs and stop signs that will installed by the City. 4) Establish lot corner monumentation within 60 days of grading completion or by November 1, 1998, after filing the final plat, whichever is sooner. 5) Provide such street maintenance and control of builder's actions to maintain roadways clear of mud, soil, and debris to provide safe driving U:`.P2�JlR(140R(]j41R0 -2301 : june.Dec; \Rrec.doc Page 2 Woods of Clearwater Creek Development Agreement DRAFT August 21, 1998 surfaces. The Developer shall provide street sweeping within 24 hours of the City's request for such services. 6) Provide for landscaping in accordance with City ordinances and other requirements The Developer shall accomplish or cause to be accomplished these actions according to generally accepted trade standards. The Developer will cause to be furnished to the City a schedule of proposed operations at least five days prior to commencement of his construction activities. Construction vehicles for site rading, streets, and utilities will utilize the existing blacktop surface on 20" Avenue to access the site. At no time shall vehicles associated with the plat development be allowed to access the site from Brian Drive. b. Site Grading, Street Construction and Building Permits No certificate of occupancy shall be issued without installation of bituminous base course across the front lot line of that property. No building permit shall be issued for any lot without the finished grading in accordance with the approved grading plan. No building permits will be issued until the rough grading for the site has been completed and approved by the City Engineer. Furthermore, only one building permit will be issued prior to installation of the bituminous base course, and this permit shall be at the discretion of the City, to allow for emergency vehicle access. C. Erosion Control The Developer shall control erosion insuring: 1) All development shall conform to the natural limitations presented by the topography and soil of the subdivision in order to create the best potential for preventing soil erosion. The Developer shall submit an erosion control plan, detailing all erosion control measures to be implemented during construction. Said plan shall be approved by the City prior to the commencement of site grading or construction. 2) Erosion and siltation control measures shall be coordinated with the different stages of development. Appropriate control measures as required by the City shall be installed prior to development when necessary to control erosion. 3) Land shall be developed in increments of workable size, as determined by the City, such that adequate erosion and siltation controls as directed by the Engineer can be provided as construction progresses. The smallest practical area of land, as determined by the City, shall be exposed at any one period of time. O 1 1 1 ROP9040R0090- 1 101 _I����c.Dc�:Agr,: 'h,c Page 3 Woods of Clearwater Creek Development Agreement DRAFT August 21, 1998 4) Where the topsoil is removed, sufficient arable soils shall be set aside for respreading over the developed area. The topsoil shall be restored to a depth of at least four (4) inches and shall be of a quality at least equal to the soil quality prior to development and the Developer shall install four (4) inches of topsoil on all boulevards and seed or sod as approved by the City. The Developer shall make all necessary adjustments to the curb stops to bring them flush with the topsoil (before occupancy). All disturbed areas shall be seeded. The quality of the top soil restored shall be equivalent to the top soil on the development prior to the removal. d. Inspection All of the work shall be under and subject to the inspection and approval of the City and the City Engineer and, where appropriate, any other governmental agency having jurisdiction. e. Easements The Developer shall make available to the City, at no cost to the City, all permanent or temporary easements necessary for the installation and use of the both the Private Improvements and the Street and Utility Improvements, as determined by the City Engineer. All such easements requested by the City shall be in writing, in recordable form, and on the standard easement form of the City and on such other terms and conditions as the City shall determine. The Developer shall be fully responsible for the recording of such easements. f Faithful Performance of Construction Contracts and Letter of Credit The Developer will fully and faithfully comply with all terms and conditions of any and all contracts entered into by the Developer for the installation and construction of all Private Improvements and hereby guarantees the workmanship and materials for a period of two years following the City's final acceptance of the Private Improvements. The Developer agrees to guarantee for a period of one year the tree plantings required as part of the Developer's Agreement, including one tree per lot or two per corner lot, as per City Ordinance Each specific tree guarantee period shall begin with the planting of each specific tree. Concurrently with the execution hereof by the Developer, the Developer will furnish to, and at all times thereafter maintain with the City, a cash deposit, certified check, or an Irrevocable Letter of Credit, based on one hundred fifty percent (150 %) of the total estimated cost of the Private Improvements as indicated in Paragraph A I. The Irrevocable Letter of Credit shall be for the exclusive use and benefit of the City of Centerville and shall state thereon the same is issued to guarantee and assure performance by the Developer of all the terms and conditions of this Development Contract and construction of all required improvements in accordance with the ordinances and specifications of the City. Such Letter of Credit may be reduced upon completion and acceptance of the Private Improvements by the City to an amount deemed adequate by the City Engineer to cover the two year warranty period described herein. The City shall have the right during said warranty period to draw on the Letter of Credit for any warranty work that is necessary. The City reserves the right to draw, in whole or in part, on any portion of the Irrevocable Letter of Credit for the purpose of guaranteeing the terms and 0 ATOJA804080pOX0.2401 junc_I7co= Agrc..doe Page 4 Woods of Clearwater Creek Development Agreement DRAFT August 21, 1998 conditions of this contract. The Irrevocable Letter of Credit shall be renewed or replaced by not later than twenty (20) days prior to its expiration with a like letter or bond. g. Reduction of Escrow Guarantee The Developer may request reduction of the Letter of Credit or cash deposit based on prepayment or the value of the completed Private Improvements at the time of the requested reduction. The amount of reduction will be determined by the City and such recommendation will be submitted to the City Council for action. h. Approval of Contractors Any contractor selected by the Developer to construct and install any Private Improvements must be determined in writing by the City Engineer to be acceptable. The City reserves the right to require satisfactory proof of successful experience and adequate financial status by any such contractor. B. STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS In accordance with the policies and ordinances of the City, the following described improvements (hereinafter collectively called the "Street and Utility Improvements "), to include improvements as described by the plans, specifications, and contract documents entitled Woods of Clearwater Creek Streets and Utilities, as prepared by the City Engineer, Howard R. Green Company, and as adopted and approved by the City Council of the City of Centerville. Said improvements shall be constructed and installed by the City to serve the Subdivision on the terms and conditions according to Ordinance #8, Section 38.01, and other improvements specific to the development herein set forth: 1. Street Construction The base course shall be completed before November 15, 1998. The wear course shall be completed before September 1, 1999, or when the City deems appropriate according to the progress of work on the individual lots. The Developer shall be liable for any increase in cost for construction of the wear course due to delays in construction on the individual lots. 2. Construction Procedures All such improvements set out in Ordinance #8, Section 38.01, and as additionally specified herein shall be instituted, constructed, and financed as follows: a. The Developer shall provide to the City in writing an indication of the contractor selected by the Developer to construct and install the Street and Utility Improvements, The City shall reserve the right to determine if the contractor selected by the Developer is acceptable. The City reserves the right to require satisfactory proof of successful experience and adequate financial status by any such contractor. b. Construction shall not begin until written notice authorizing construction to start is received by the Developer from the City. O:1PRO.11R040ROj\OR0.2401,1�,,i .Uovr\erc. -doc Page5 Woods of Clearwater Creek Development Agreement DRAFT August 21, 1998 G. Construction shall be completed to the standards and specifications described in the plans and specifications entitled Woods of Clearwater Creek Streets and Utilities. d. The Developer shall provide a Disbursement Agreement as Security for the construction of the Street and Utility Improvements as referenced in paragraph B above, Street and Utility Improvements. e. As outlined in the Disbursement Agreement, the City shall give written notice to the Developer and the Lender whether the City approves or rejects the Street and Utility Improvements pay estimate through that particular stage of construction submitted for approval. 3. Security and Required Payment Therefor Prior to the preparation of final plans and specifications for the construction of said improvements, the Developer shall provide to the City a cash escrow in an amount indicated in writing to provide for financing the cost of preparing said final plans and specifications by the City Engineer. Furthermore, the Developer shall also provide a cash escrow to the City in an amount indicated in writing to provide for financing the cost of inspection, staking, and construction administration by the City Engineer. Said cash escrow, including accrued interest thereon, may be used by the City upon default by Developer. C. RECORDING AND RELEASE The Developer agrees that the terms of this Development Contract shall be a covenant on any and all property included in the Subdivision. The Developer agrees that the City shall have the right to record a copy of this Development Contract with the Anoka County Recorder to give notice to future purchasers and owners. This shall be recorded against the Subdivision described on page 1 hereof. D. REIMBURSEMENT OF COSTS The Developer agrees to fully reimburse the City for all costs incurred by the City including, but not limited to, the actual costs of construction of said improvements, engineering fees, legal fees, inspection fees, interest costs, costs of acquisition of necessary easements, if any, and any other costs incurred by the City relating to this Development Contract and the installation and financing of the aforementioned improvements. E. OCCUPATION OF PREMISES The Developer further agrees that they will not cause to be occupied any premises upon the plat or any property within the plat until the completion of the gas, electric, telephone, water, and sewer improvements required by this Development Contract have been installed, unless the City has agreed in writing to waive this requirement as to a specific premises. Furthermore, Developer shall be granted no certificates of occupancy for homes within the plat prior to substantial completion of all Private and Street and Utility Improvements described in this Agreement, including the base course layer of pavement. Building Permits shall be issued only within the constraints of Section A, Part 2b o�TI ZO. nsnaa90 i_ d,w Pagc6 Woods of Clearwater Creek Development Agreement DRAFT August 21, 1998 F. CLEAN UP . The Developer shall be responsible to keep new and existing streets clean and shall conduct routine sweeping of the project area. The Developer shall clean streets no later than 24 hours after being notified by the City. G. HOMEOWNER NOTICE Developer agrees to provide the owner of each lot purchased within the development on or before the date of closing a statement in substantially the form shown as Exhibit A hereto. A signed copy of such agreement shall be returned to the City within ten (10) days following execution by the homeowner. H. OWNERSHIP OF IMPROVEMENTS Upon completion of the work and construction required by this contract and acceptance by the City, the improvements lying within the public easements shall become City property without further notice or action. 1. REIMBURSEMENT OF COSTS FOR DEFENSE The Developer agrees to reimburse the City for all costs incurred by the City in defense of enforcement of this contract, or any portion thereof, including court costs and reasonable engineering and attorney's fees. J. VALIDITY If any portion, section, subsection, sentence, clause, paragraph, or phrase in this contract is for any reason held to be invalid by a court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect or void any of the other provisions of the Development Contract. K. GENERAL 1. Binding Effect The terms and provisions hereof shall be binding upon and insure to the benefit of the heirs, representatives, successors, and assigns of the parties hereto and shall be binding upon all future owners of all or any part of the Subdivision and shall be deemed covenants running with the land. 2. Notice Whenever in this Agreement it shall be required or permitted that notice or demand be given or served by either party to this Agreement to or on the other party, such notice or demand shall be delivered personally or mailed by United States mail to the addresses herein before set forth on Page 1 by certified mail (return receipt requested). Such notice or demand shall be deemed timely given when delivered personally or when deposited in the mail in accordance with the above_ The addresses of the parties hereto are as set forth on Page I until changed by notice given as above. 3. Final Plat Approved The City agrees to give final approval to the plat of the Subdivision upon execution and delivery of this Agreement and of all required petitions, bonds, fees, and securities indicated in Exhibit B 4. Incorporation by Reference All plans, special provisions, proposals, specifications, and contracts for the improvements furnished and let pursuant to this Agreement shall be and hereby are made a part of this agreement by reference as fully as if set out herein in full. 0 : 1PROR8040800IM_2401 tll,..Del %91eC.d,,, Pagc7 Woods of Clearwater Creek Development Agreement DRAFT August 21, 1998 L. VIOLATION OF AGREEMENT In the event that Developer violates any of the covenants and agreements contained in this Development Contract and to be performed by the Developer, the City, at its option, in addition to the rights and remedies as set out hereunder may refuse to issue building permits to any property within the plat until such time as such default has been corrected to the satisfaction of the City. M. PARK DEDICATION The Developer agrees to provide park dedication to the City in the form of a cash payment of $7,500 calculated at $750 per lot multiplied by 10 N. TRAIL DEDICATION The Developer agrees to provide trail dedication to the City in the form of a cash payment of $1,500 calculated at $150 per lot multiplied by 10 lots. O. STORMWATER FEES The stormwater fee shall be paid by the Developer prior to approval of the final plat. This fee is $13,002.94, based on a charge of $0.01546 per square foot of 19.31 acres of platted area. P. LIABILITY INSURANCE REQUIREMENT The Developer shall provide to the City, at the Developer's expense, general public liability and property damage insurance including vehicle coverage protecting the City and the Developer from all claims for personal injury, including death, and all claims for construction of or damage to property, arising out of or in connection with any operations under these contract documents, whether such operations be by the Developer, its Contractor, or by any subcontractor, or anyone directly or indirectly employed by the Contractor or by a subcontractor under him. Insurance shall be written with a Iii of liability of not less than $600,000 for all damages arising out of bodily injury including death, at any time resulting therefrom, sustained by any one person in any one accident; and a limit of liability of not less than $1,000,000 for any such damage sustained by two or more persons in any one accident. Insurance shall be written with a limit of liability of not less than $300,000 for all property damage sustained by one person in any one accident, and a limit of liability of not less than $600,000 for any such damage sustained by two or more persons in any one accident. The insurance policies shall accompany the contract for its execution by the Developer and the City of Centerville. The above insurance policies shall be in full force and effect during the life of this contract. DEVELOPER CITY OF CENTERVILLE Mr. Richard Travis By: By: Mayor ATTEST: By: City Clerk 0 Page 8 Woods of Clearwater Creek Development Agreement DRAFT August 21, 1998 1, , the undersigned, do hereby verify that I am an individual known as and hereby personally guarantee all duties, obligations, and undertaking set forth in this Development Contract. STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) SS. COUNTY OF ANOKA ) On this day of 1998, before me, a Notary Public within and for said County, personalty appeared Tom Wilharber to me known to be the Mayor of the City of Centerville, and who executed the foregoing instrument and acknowledged that he executed the same on behalf of said City. Notary Public STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) SS. COUNTY OF ANOKA ) On this day of 1998, before me, a Notary Public within and for said County, personally appeared Ry -Chcl Gaustad to me known to be the City Clerk of the City of Centerville. and who executed the foregoing instrument and acknowledged that she executed the same on behalf of said City. Notary Public STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) SS. COUNTY OF ANOKA ) On this day of 1998, before me, a Notary Public within and for said County, personally appeared to me known as a corporation under the laws of the State of Minnesota, and that they executed the foregoing instrument and acknowledged that they executed the same on behalf of said corporation. Notary_ Public STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) SS. COUNTY OF ANOKA ) On this day of 1998, before me, a Notary Public within and for said County, personally appeared to me known to be the person described in and %vho executed the foregoing instrument and acknowledged that he executed the same as his free act and deed. Notary Public 0 PRO.1 -2401 lum•. Do Agree. doc Woods of Clearwater Creek Development Agreement DRAFT August 21, 1998 EXHIBIT A I, future homeowner of Lot _, Block Woods of Clearwater Creek Development, do understand that: • It is my responsibility as propertv owner that within 30 days (May - September) or by June Ist (October- April), my lot will be landscaped and sodded per ordinance in a manner that prevents erosion due to wind or water. • It is my responsibility as propcm owner to maintain the sod and trees that have been installed. Trees are guaranteed for one year from initial plant date. • Grading will not be altered on my lot. Drainage will comply with the grading plan. • I understand that there may be drainage casements, utility casements and/or trail easements on my property. • I understand that sidewalk is part of this development and may be constructed on my lot. Date: Buyer/Homcowner Signature A copy of this must be returned to the City of Centerville, 1880 Main Street, Centerville, Minnesota 55038, prior to issuance of the Building Permit. 0\PROJ\804080i \090 -2401 .ju ne. DevA^_rou.do. Woods of Clearwater Creek Development Agreement DRAFT August 21, 1998 EXHIBIT B CASH FEES I. Stormwater Fee $13,002.94 2. Park Dedication Fee $7,500.00 3. Trail Dedication Fee $1,500 4. Final Plat Filing $200.00 5. Administration Foes $100 /Lot $1.000.00 TOTAL $23,202.94 SECURITIES 1_ Street and Utility Improvements (Disbursement Agreement) 2. Private Improvements (Paragraph A I) TOTAL 0:%PROJ\904080j \ONO- 2401.june. DevAg rcc.drx , NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING CITY OF CENTERVILLE COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA Preliminary Plat PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that a public hearing will be held before the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Centerville at City Hall, 1880 Main Street. The said meeting will take place on Tuesday, August 4, 1998 at 7:00 p.m. or shortly thereafter. The purpose of the hearing w ill be to hear all parties present regarding the consideration of preliminary plat approval for the property legally described as: R14 31 22 41 000' 31 22 41 0004 Locally known as: 7305 20th Avenue and 7353 20th Avenue. Written comments will be accepted until 4:00 p.m. on August 4, 1998. City Hall is ADA accessible. Requests for hearing assistance devices or a sign language interpreter must be received before July 21, 1998. Such a request may be made by telephone (612- 429 -3232) or by facsimile (612- 429 - 8629). All interested persons are invited to attend and to be heard. You may call City Hall at 429 -3232 if you have any questions or need additional information. June 26, 1998 /s/Ry -Chet Gaustad, CMC City Clerk abcdefghijklmnopgrstuvwxyz Published in the Times July 16 & 23, 1998. -- _ co w ' a 1 REVOIR STREET 1e lee :ate �!ssa �IS !z;., P >6K O 0 00000 � s n Ic s a > a 6 'All 13 !NS Ira- • =g i e a DUEEEC STREET 73RD STREET of vu _ ° SSO No 1a+sl a,al a — - I O C Ifi IJ 1- IS Z 17 2 't+l IU7 :13 la•9 13'311 1P5I 1.71 19 "• S 'J— — > u 16 - +'+ + ]5. s - 73RD STREET 171 11 !L!O 1Y6 Stl0 �' a 3 Z 3 l Y �:• 4 g — MEMO August 3, 1998 To: Planning and Zonin From: Paul Palzer I�w Re: The Woods of Clerwater Creek *xak ak ac at a�: *:;a<x, ;r:Fxa,[NMTx, k.>t *at a�x *Mare ak a�:kye:kae *ak ak ae ieM * # *Mk Ntxx�e:k ix .',� *ak -h, is akx ae ak ia�; ias >;x *-X, a'e aex a'e The following are issues that should be addressed before approval of the preliminary plat for this development. 1. The lowest floor elevations are to be 2 feet above the ordinary high water level and the DNR wetland 4545 has a level of 907 plus or minus as shown. This elevation needs to be determined and the lowest floors of the adjoining homes are required to be 2 feet higher. 2. The plat shows a 10 feet trail easement and the city has been requiring 20 feet for trails due to snow removal issues. A culvert or bridge over the existing ditch should be shown for access to the park on Revoir Street. 3. Consideration should be given for looping the watermain to Revoir Street or have some money put in escrow towards this purpose. 4. The length of Brian Drive, roughly 960 feet, is longer than allowed by ordinance (800 feet maximum) and a variance would be required to approve a longer cul -de -sac. J 5. The sidewalk along the west side of Brian drive should be extended to the north boundary of the plat to provide access to the trail and park system 6. The Engineer should review this plat for conformance to the City's Standards. 7. Recently Jim March and myself viewed the area north of this plat on the west end and standing water in a pond is visible from the Revoir street park. This pond is not identified on the plat or its extent into the future road extension to the north. 8. An outlet or drainage flow for the wetland areas are not shown for the central portion between the two ten acres areas. Will this flow to the north or south and are existing storm drainage systems able to accommodate these additional flows. 9. I have not seen the Rice Creek Watershed report on this parcel and their comments and requirements. GLENN EHBE %N j COMPANIES 8651 NAPLES ST. N.E. • BLAINE, MN 55449 (612) 784 -0657 To: City Of Centerville 8/6/98 1880 Main Street Centerville, NLN 55038 Attention' Paul Palzer Reference: The Woods Of Clearwater Creek This letter is in response to your memo dated August 3, 1998 addressed to the City of Centerville Planning and Zoning. In an attempt to keep this proposed project on a schedule to begin construction yet this fall I will try to address your questions myself immediately as opposed to waitin for answers from our engineer or survey departments. -Jli of these responses correspond to the numbering of your questions. Please forgive any e-rors in spelling or grammar. I am enclosing the latest and greatest grading plan and preliminary plat for your information. i. The lowest floor elevations for the East side are partially based on the HWL of wetland — 1''545 of 907. The plus or minus that was on the preliminary plat has been removed to give the actual elevation as 907. This information came as a result of correspondence received from the DNR and I believe was copied to HGA. I will verify Dave Nyberg has received it. The issue of the lowest floor elevation being 2 feet above HWL of wetland 7'545 was discussed at the Planning and Zoning meeting. Apparently the requirement is to be on'iy 1 foot above HWL which our plat shows. We also are creating a wetland mitigation pond with a controlled elevation of 905.5 which would give even more separation. The West side of the site lowest floor elevations are based on the elevation of the 1x:":'n we'lands on this side of the site and also the new sediment pond. We are maintaining at least a 2 foot separation here. Please let us know if we need to change these elevations. We along with HGA are currently locking at options to possibly ease the South property owners current drainage problems and will be available to discuss these at a meeting on this site on Tuesday 9 -11- 98 with the time yet to be determined by Dave Nyberg. 2. We have chanted the easement shown from 10' to 20' as requested for the trail. We are not proposing to construct the trail or any appurtenances that may or may not be needed. Please feel free to contact me, William McCully or Tim Kytonen should you have any questions or need additional information. Sincerely, Dick Travis Project Coordinator cc: Dave Nyberg cc: William McCully Howard R, Green Company CONSULTING ENGINEERS FernerlyMSa Consulting Engineers August 6, 1998 File: 804080J -0240 Mr. Jim March City Administrator City of Centerville 1880 Main Street Centerville, MN 55038 RE: WOODS OF CLEARWATER CREEK PLAT AND GRADING PLAN REVIEW Dear Mr. March: We have completed a review of the preliminary plat and grading plan received on August 3` and July 29` respectively. The following is a list of items identified for comment during our review. Please be aware that some significant items need to be addressed and another review will be necessary. Preliminary Plat • As indicated in our letter dated July 1, 1998, drainage easements along the front and side yard property lines must be shown. • The temporary cul -de -sac extends beyond the right -of -way. Temporary right -of -way needs to be defined to cover this. • The drainage easement along the western edge of the plat should match the west (rear) . property line. • The boundary of the drainage easement at the northwest corner of the plat and on the east side of the wetland in the center of the plat is undefined. • A 10 -foot trail easement is shown along the south side of Lot 1, Block 1. Trail easements are required to be 20 feet wide. Grading Plan • As requested in our letter dated July 1 1998, pond and storm drainage calculations must be submitted to our office for review. • The ordinary high water level of the central wetland still has the ±907 designation. The Mn /DNR, in a letter dated June 30, 1998, actually indicated an elevation between 907 and 908. The Department of Natural Resources should be contacted to request additional O: \P ROJ\260000m1000 -0605. a ug. doo 1 37E P,arrnr Park n,w. . Ct Po,d MN F91 nQ . Al 0MAA_A'SAO f— Al OIAAA_QAAC 1 -114— a90ioco_naoo Mr. Jim March August 6, 1998 Page 2 information about this wetland, or additional calculations should be done to try and determine the HWL. • Spot elevations and survey data should be shown along the south plat boundary to confirm that the drainage will be contained within the plat. • The wetland on Lots 1 and 2, Block 2 has a listed 100 -year water elevation of 907.9, prior to mitigation. This is an apparent contradiction with the existing outlet for this area at 905.5. As the proposed low floor elevation is 908, this is an important issue to address. • Spot elevations are needed to accurately show the outflow from the proposed pond and confirm that it does flow north. • The grades on the north side of the cul -de -sac are steep. A 3:1 minimum is required. This may require moving the cul -de -sac to the south. • Along the south line of Lot 1, Block 1, a swale is shown in the trail easement. This will not be acceptable. The trail easement must be provided above drainage swales. • The house on Lot 1, Block 1 is shown as a full- basement walk -out with the garage dropped 3 feet. A split -entry level home would work better here. • Lots 2, 3, and 4 of Black 1 have only 10 -20 feet between the house and the edge of the pond. It may be possible to increase the backyard width by moving the road to the east in front of these homes. The houses on Lots 2 and 3, Block 2, would need to be moved over, but wetland encroachment should not be an issue given the size of the proposed mitigation pond. Mr. Paul Palzer, Centerville Public Works, provided a memo dated August 3, 1998 to the planning and zoning commission outlining several concerns. These concerns also need to be addressed prior to approval of the plat and grading plan. Sincerely, Howard R. Green Company ' D au_V�Yj- _ David E. Nyberg, P.E. Project Manager DEN /st cc: Mr. Paul Palzer, Centerville Public Works Mr. Dick Travis, Glenn Rehbein, Inc. Mr. Bill McCully, Glenn Rehbein, Inc. Mr. Tim Kytonen, Glenn Rehbein, Inc. Howard R. Green Company O: VPROJl260000m1000- 0605.a ug.doc CONSULTING ENGINEERS EROSION CONTROL NOTES e F 1. PRIOR TO RpUGH. GRADING, ''INSTALL SILT STOP rCNCt IN LDCATIONS SHOVN. ADbIT10NAL SILT STOP FENCES^.�'y; - r VILL BE REQUIRED WHERE LOCAL CONDITIONS REOUIPE. 2 ROUGH GRADING SHALL PROCEED ON AN AREA BY AREA Scale: / SO' BASIS TO MINIMIZC UNCOMPLETED AREAS, 1 Cap[ Contour Iet treat z. 3. AS EACH AREA OUTSIDE THE STREET IS GRADED. PROVIDE fI•G•v •D. vertical Letum, 4. f - NATIVE 7QPS071, SEED, AND MIA,CN ANEMDPED vITM A - 4 * -0- 0 DCAD[!e R[DIDS on COD C rol. STRAIGHT $ET DISC AS SOON AS PRACTICAL AFTER. EPA DING. 49>DDenotea Ptopoied elevations (9 OS Denahas Exsti�tJ view. k. HAINTAIN AND REPAIR SILT STOP FENCES (INCLUDING �• Dlno tea AS[lCtlon Df ■o[face Aril sage. REMOVAL OF ACCUMULATED SILT) UNTIL VEGETATION IS ESTABLISHED" ' DeaOtea Proposed c11t1Ors. - l Desotei e[latdns,eontoura. PR OP, DESCRIPTION � Denotes PrDpo usd store sever catch basin, e Denote• propoved atote sever Iine, " 71-.c Fartk 112 of s!c N.E. 1/G cf F.E. l!6 8 . 9 . 0 . Devotee shallnv walkout basement. 'r-U- Denotes fall walkout basemen[, efSee.- 96 -11. �. 22, Xavkv Cam. V13- [ o teeKwta AeaP �'Ho °se; , -- -_ Sc6)¢ct Ia roam acv sa ecacF3"Is. �tipgrs I sen:n� - rf7fov y.rs *M.) a�wl•9 P-d -7 Dem4os C %IT Finae. (Iaor.An7e9t) ® Dcno+,rs so; -re, 7- pit. , / I ProPoSed Mlnmurrl Basemen= 906 (gcK 2)905 Bat<I� / PrpPos ec( Waflnna F-M, 2,910 Yq. F'I-.. &Tpf / .T (TO elLac 7� Gi /y Se76• -ck5� - r / x403,8 l l a 1- � 0 ` T 9b1.59 905,29, 11: GONSTRUGTION CF SILT FENGE i. f vR .MK w M rRR ES 9�Y (T 79 Y �- 1 + ? Ire- 3 ^' � / x 905.63/ !� - ,< a KMm . bra Mr M cn• L � .g f M I 'm al O�H�LVAR vlzalrt FCC"F, r Cjr , aG�<h EROSION CONTROL NOTES I FOUGH CAADD4G. JNSTALL SILT $TOP rENCE - TIONS SHOWM ADDITIONAL SILT STOP FENCES - R x.,.Y . - REQUIRED "ERE LOCAL CONDITIONS REQUIRE. TRADING SHALL PROCEED ON AN AREA BY AREA scale: 1 SD' - O HINIMIZC UNCOHPLETED AREAS. t feet Contour - lnteewsL T AREA OUTSIDE THE STREET IS GRADED. PROVIDE R ' c •�.• D • Vertical batum, - TOPSOIL. SEED, AND MULCH ANCHORED V)TH A D- ©Dcietea lreBfon Control, T SET DISC AS SOON AS PRACTICAL AFTER.. GRADING De note a ptapOaed olewatlons�9O,Sx DegG!a5 E.>t:5'fiRCl e /Cy. 1 AND REPAIR SILT STOP FENCES (INCLUDING . Denotes direction Of surface drainage- OF ACCUMULATED SILTS UNTIL VE6ETATIDN IS ESTABLISHED Denatr■ Proposed can tOa[ *, ` - � -- Denotes crier AnQ contour*. :11°T1GN ©Denotee proposed store serat catch basin, PROPERTY GESC( ��--� Denotes Proposed *torn sewer live. 1/4 o .f famlb 112 lkc N.E. S.E. 114 i.e.0, D enotes •hollow walkout basement. \ \ Qf O.D.O. Denotes fall , ,Ikout basement. \ 1 . -TI, 22. Aa®ke Cn. Lai. L. o. . - L *f-f a {ear Propr Z.nr'n d "House, Thject la raatta ace Oar ecscu-Imwla. 1 bS 0LV' A ry.�s HPn� �jq�•9 . Dr ❑ -o- Drnhas C %IT fmc`. �1OO'Fr�ega.� F . ProPoSed MfnimNni Basem eii'� - = 9D6 �$LK 7.��9DS Br-kl� �. .. � - Proposed Worland Fri /: 1,910 Sq. F'>"..�7YPE 6 AL (ro .aR.w4 to c;a sefc..�ks) �• / r9o3:e \ �� I � o / \ ` 901.59 905.29 - l� \\ - S 89'lV ` \ 1 �- fo-IP6S r ' — -' ly- /J ° O' �/✓M tI- V -F � ' l ' rfo� 1 OF SILT FENCE 1 / ` 9 i - -enP n I • S TAi PG' - L \ \ .r�"r -(. � .A JSTr'2l1GTION T A'y 1 5 9o7.G YW QfL A I WPR / X 908.71 �1 905.63 9 O> � \ da.4� y / { CR TRFAR DYBE. 0./,MIQ _ HNl �6 j l P(a [0 Wk2 R N IY M ICTALL 2 EHC6 WF R OF WIPr POHU RO]A ROiO (1]' MlRltllllt iHtbllS) �� MIKL"!tl R y If19 eIJIK R rua f' -IS au HML mom vnn ,r_.wrz �I,G (u u�uaicncy P (YMI A Mp.. w w C Elan l - - -L ---- nKRwll K FlCJ HQfCH m ' M DE PoNO BCTTW -� - - - \ � E• SGY W BA Vii°: Edf�S �. �v L�9`� Y flick - 4 lSoeics Travis -- -- ACCW FlL l.A. 'evx sts _ iEfI fTJ�TE - . -- TYPICAL BAFFLED WEIR DETAIL - PLAN VIEW OF TYPICAL WEIR Circle - Piper, t7n. -- — — — — — — — — / 908.23 SCALE IN FEET F 50 0 25 50 100 200 X 11 n 1 WCH 30 fEE1 i _ 7 I E 12 8.30 — Norii /!nom .f se tti d� 'fNSjt 6 6 sos s3 * w Lll i � \ 4k � ) 4- > r � A LL z4_- -9 P1 -- \ \ , k. % 13.76 `.� P—: Cn I I .� Ak Q' jig ep� 912.44 y, Wcn ' A`° 'C U 914155 I I� \ 15 i 15.08 Ak / i d 15.23 )1 Ix I hereby certify that this survey, plan, *Y= - or report was prepared by me or under my � f direct super -lsion and that I am a duly IM1'433357 TRIO �1�, 1bDAD CTi PIRMI IZ Registered E�grnear under the laws 8651 Naples St. N.E. ■lsiwe ill of the State of Minnesota. i✓AT /r9c fel: 784 -0657 Date gistration No 1-,,3138 r7. bp� I fi V 7r — -.-- - 906 \\ I 7rf I I _ - �� / x \ SSIb l6 .III � vY ay 44'l 44216 AT I III w' i �rr 6 9b'bl0 11 ,a ' ?( cvv ) *fr tf ) 9CCI 11 ` \ \ I _ - 1,46- -Tr{ I 01,6 I I r! Dk� �EtLA~y i /� I" \ o III U I II ! , }in U, III j I ' !` IN 41 .N� I ;m III i a 912 �.� ' N[naJr 1 Cn i 914;55 JLL Lk IL " }4 Q - 906.15 � I DF '06 V A — r�� -� 5. 67 II i � ' 1 ' \ Z. U _ 1 \ I / 1 1 fr I �• y� ` I�1 I 15.08 Ak }' 1269.29— 8£E41VE — % 15.23 910 91(— I r L f hereby certify that this survey, pl *Y: Or report was prepared by me or under my !! direct supervision and that I am a duly IMISI'JJ Inob VI Co � Registered E�7 neor under the laws f651 Naples St. N.E. if of the State of Minnesota. tef: 784 -D337 Dote Rigistration N 1-3138 t { aIl i " 3 v `� k • I , �V - _ E I �,. S . E Wcffnn� 7I 11 3 L , I .Z �o I'f F.3' 'p? _ y q l 90.59 \ area \ Ak y 897.58 it r - _ .— 9. - - /! r ^� ..i �' � mPer ✓revs ,�I, ` __- h d of 4 \ 'i. � 3 n � v X 905 P/ klt ion Perl er. `� j 89250, `� 905.52 AL 896.52 So 896.75 4 4 I - .r j ttiVIC s ...� .+ f.vva.:. nQ x. -_�- �� i , 3 ' 1 ~ iz,e � Otis J• � � . / / /� ) 905.63 _ - -- r / X908.71 9, ?g o C A I OZ q,1 - - We;tlandJ Ic • j 9ca, 90 .59 \ 1 I I (as '� 3 v�� .� vv v Ak Iq� I �; 897.58 ,9 \ Nk I Y oI 3 !' X905 p/ Pere � \ 0� 61 lire} I _ 1 o �c d6 111 oBd 897.50 e 905.52 1 001 P /- 1 � 13.76 I I �- �� / I O / r _� I 014.26 / 10 III IO l0, If IIIN I I I I I . I I ' 912.44 � -i y: �Wen� / �_ III � 914155 ` OD I I I ' ♦ \ I. I I 1 i' \ ♦ � I III ♦ k9cB,5 - � I I i I -- " r 1 I 15,67 I I +I D !, 1 � \ 1 1 c ' �, `- �Dr,:. e � -, _mil I ALL MEMO DATE : August 21, -1998 TO : Honorable Mayor and Council FROM: Jim March RE LaMotte Park At the meeting, we will be discussing the bids received for the first phase of construction at LaMotte Park. The bid opening is scheduled for 10:00 on August 25. The City Engineer will be bringing a tally of the bid results for distribution at the meeting. There are currently seven planholders for the project. � From: Mr. & Mrs. Johnson MAY _? 13Ju ,-. 7017 Brian Drive Centerville, MN 55038 To: City of Centerville Planning and Zoning Commission 1880 Main Street Centerville, MN 55038 RE: PROPOSED REZONING OF R23- 31- 22 -41- 0003 -THAT PRT OF THE El /2 OF THE N1 /2 FO THE NI/2 OF THE SE 1/4 FO SEC 23 TWP 3IN. R23- 31 -22 -41 -0004- T14E N 330 FT OF THE El/2 OF THE N1/2 OF THE SE 1/4 OF SEC 23 TWP 3IN. The rezoning of this property from R2 to B 1 would be inappropriate and irresponsible. The job of the City Planning and Zoning Commission is to maintain the integrity of the City and its residents by making decisions that will benefit the City and it's residents. The reason that this property is currently zoned R2 is because 100's of families and thousands of children surround this property. The people that currently built houses in this neighborhood and long standing tax payers of this city moved here to get away from bright lights and commercial sites typical of the inner city. There are many more appropriate settings in the City of Centerville for commercial property. Make the and vote against this proposal. We are prepared to use any legal means as necessary to stop this proposed rezoning. Lets not make a mountain out of a molehill and stop this proposal swiftly. Sincerely, 4 r. n Mrs. Jo so May 25, 1998 City of Centerville 1880 Main St. Centerville, Mn. 55038 City of Centerville Planning and Zoning Commission, This letter is in response to the rezoning of R23 -31 -41 -003 & R23- 31 -22 -41 -0004 etc or locally known as Lake Area Utilities Cont. Inc. My husband and myself are urging the Zoning Commission to keep the above said property as residential. We live in a new home that borders this property. We have only lived here for the past six months. We chose this property for the obvious reasons, which do not include commercial property right next door. We called the city before purchasing this lot and were told there were no plans for that particular property. Now we come to find out that you want to put commercial property right next door to my new home!!!! That is ridicules!!!!! We expected that at some point there would be another home built next to ours, although we were hoping for a park or refuse for the wild life. Had we known your intentions we would have chose to build elsewhere. We have spent a lot of time and money on our new home. We do not intend to have the value of our new home depreciate and that is what will happen. Our family moved here from the city to have peace and quiet not a business next door. Then there is the issue of safety and security in our neighborhood. The street we live on is a dead end. We have many small children and we are very concerned about the increased traffic. Also this piece of land is home to many of the wildlife in the area. We look out the window and see deer in our backyard and ducks swimming in the pond. Maybe we should think of preserving some of this. We will fight to keep this from becoming a reality. Our home and our new way of life are at stake. We will attend your meeting on June 2 nd to show our support to veto this outrageous proposal. Sincerely, Georgine & Robert Kurschner 7005 Brian Dr. Centerville, MN. 55038 MAY 1 9 1998 Concerning the proposed zoning change for property just south of 7008 Brian dr., please don't 11 feel very strongly about living next to any commercial enterprise. My wife and I left the city of St. Paul a year and one half ago for some peace and quiet, after retiring from the Fire Department. So again, PLEASE RETAIN THE PRESENT RESIDENTIAL ZONING. Respectfully, Ronald and Mary Ann Lenz 7008 Brian DR. Centerville n v' MEMO DATE August 24, 1998 TO Honorable Mayor and Council FROM Jim March RE Arden Hills Case Study At the workshop on August 19, staff was directed to contact the staff at Arden Hills to see how their recent transition went when they switched from H.R. Green to BRW, Inc. I spoke to Terry Post from Arden Hills on the above mentioned matter. Mr. Post indicated that the transition was not as painless as everyone had hoped. He indicated that it is difficult to have a total transition from old to new without running into some problems. Mr. Post mentioned that they felt they were treated as an ex- client in regards to after they made the announcement to switch firms. The City of Arden Hills thought that they would receive their City records that HR. Green held in a few weeks, when actually it took several months. This issue caused some friction and animosity between H.R. Green and BRW, Inc. The City arbitrarily picked a date of November I to have the transition complete between the old and new firms. He mentioned this was helpful to have a date when the old firm was no longer expected to be working in the community. lvlr. Post indicated they did not have any subdivisions or major development projects that were occurring during the transition. They did have a formal pavement management program that suffered during the transition. The City typically would select the streets to be redeveloped in the fall and then start the public information process. The streets did end up getting replaced as usual, but the process did not run as smoothly as normal due to the timing of the transition of firms. MEMO DATE : August 24, 1998 TO i Honorable Mayor and Council FROM Jim March = RE Major Projects Status List At the workshop on August 19, staff was directed to develop a list of major projects and indicate the status of those projects. It was also directed that staff contact Bonestroo to assess their comfort level with stepping in to the various development projects that are in various levels of completion. A meeting has been scheduled with Bonestroo on Tuesday, August 25 to investigate this matter. I expect to deliver written results of the meeting to the City Council, prior to the meeting on Wednesday. Major Prgject Status 1) Lakeland Hills (remaining issues) - Final asphalt lift, storm drainage through the culvert under Main Street, entrance monuments, trail paving, punch list items 2) Acorn Creek I and II - Final punch list items 3) Clearwater Meadows - Final punch list items 4) Eagle Pass - Draintile replacement, final lift of asphalt, road connection to Parkview, park improvements, no punch list generated 5) LaMotte Park - Bid opening for first phase of improvements scheduled for August 25 6) Parkview Development - Finalize and certify grading, ready to begin utility installation, award bonds on August 26 7) 20th Avenue Utility Project - Sewer and watermains to be tested by next week, begin installation of forcemain 8) Woods of Clearwater Creek - Grading has begun under permit, Project at preliminary plat and development agreement approval stage 9) Center Villa - This development is at the pre - rezoning stage. 10) Flashing Crosswalk Lights - This project is in the stage of selecting an engineering firm to begin design work. I will be discussing a written quote from Bonestroo on Tuesday. 11) 21st Avenue Road Improvement - The construction for this project may be delayed until next year. The project is going to be dependent on the weather as well as on the coordination and delivery information from Lino Lakes to meet the public process for assessing a portion of the costs to the adjacent property owners. The joint powers agreement is ready for execution. 12) Water Interconnect - This project is on hold until the 21st Avenue project joint powers agreement is signed. 13) Public Works Building - I am assuming this project is on hold until after we have the MN Design Team consider the site. 14) MN Design Team - The Design Team is scheduled to be in the community from September 24 - 27. The mixed use zoning is one issue that was going to be delayed until after the visit from the committee. 15) Elementary School Building - Con -spec is currently designing a 22,000 square foot building that is going to be leased back to the Centennial School District. I6) Terminal Transport - Under construction 4 17) Goetz Landscaping - They have requested to meet with staff on Thursday, August 24 to discuss the status of their plans for building. 18) Husnik Commercial Building - We have received a sketch plan for a 6,000 square foot commercial building that Husnik would like to build on the comer of Main Street and Peterson Trail. 19) Liebel Property on Centerville Lake - It has been mentioned that the Liebe] property has been sold and they will be bringing in plans for a five unit subdivision. 20) East ten acres of Travis Property - Gerald Rehbein has purchased this property and is interested in developing the site. 21) 1999 Budget - The initial levy needs to be certified by September 15, A workshop has been scheduled for 6:00 on September 2. 22) Union Contract - The union contract is up for renewal. An initial meeting to discuss the contract has been scheduled for August 28. 23) Police Joint Powers - This is an on -going project to explore the feasibility of establishing a three city police department. I will be continuing to investigate all of the City's options if the three City department fails to be established. The above projects are in no particular order. The above list is the best estimate available at this time of major projects we will have to deal with prior to the end of the year. Other issues may develop that are not anticipated at this time, primarily commercial/industrial developments. The list does not include less major issues such as ordinance codification, shoreland ordinance, on -going maintenance issues, etc... STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF ANOKA CITY OF CENTERVILLE RESOLUTION 98 -19 ELECTING TO CONTINUE PARTICIPATING IN THE LOCAL HOUSING INCENTIVES ACCOUNT PROGRAM UNDER THE METROPOLITAN LIVABLE COMMUNITIES ACT CALENDER YEAR 1999 WHEREAS, the Metropolitan Livable Communities Act (Minnesota Statues Section 473.25 to 473.254) establishes a Metropolitan Livable Communities Fund which is intended to address -_ housing and other development issues facing the metropolitan area defined by Minnesota Statutes section 473.121, and WHEREAS, the Metropolitan Livable Communities Fund, comprising the Tax Base Revitalization Account, the Livable Communities Demonstration Account and the Local Housing Incentive Account, is intended to provide certain funding and other assistance to metropolitan area municipalities, and WHEREAS, a metropolitan area municipality is not eligible to received grants or loans under the Metropolitan Livable Communities Fund or eligible to receive certain polluted sites cleanup funding from the Minnesota Department of Trade and Economic Development unless the municipality is participating in the Local Housing Incentives Account Program under the Minnesota Statutes section 473.254; and WHEREAS, the Metropolitan Livable Communities Act requires the Metropolitan Council to negotiate with each municipality to establish affordable and life -cycle housing goals for that municipality that are consistent with and promote the policies of the Metropolitan Council as provided in the adopted Metropolitan Development Guide; and WHEREAS, each municipality must identify to the Metropolitan Council the actions the municipality plans to take to meet the established housing goals through preparation of the Housing Action Plan; and WHEREAS, the Metropolitan Council adopted, by resolution after a public hearing, negotiated affordable and life -cycle housing goals for each participating municipality; and WHEREAS, a metropolitan area municipality which elects to participate in the Local Housing Incentives Account Program must do so by November 15 of each year; and WHEREAS, for calendar year 1999, a metropolitan area municipality that participated in the Local Housing Incentive Account Program during the calendar year 1998, can continue to participate under Minnesota Statutes section 473.254 if (a) the municipality elects to participate in the Local Housing Incentives Account Program by November 15, 1998; and (b) the metropolitan Council and the municipality have successfully negotiated affordable and life -cycle housing goals for the municipality: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT the City of Centerville hereby elects to participate in the Local Housing Incentives Program under the Metropolitan Livable Communities Act during the Calendar year 1999. Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. Thomas Wilharber, Mayor ATTEST: Ry -Chel Gaustad, CMC City Clerk STATE OF MINNESOTA CITY OF CENTERVILLE RESOLUTION 98 -01 *1998 APPOINTMENTS WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Centerville met on January 14, 1998, at City Hall; and, WHEREAS, the City_ Council of the City of Centerville discussed appointments for the 1998 year; THE CITY OF CENTERVILLE HEREBY RESOLVES, the following persons are hereby appointed to the named positions; 1. Acting Mayor - Mary Jo Helmbrecht 2. Animal Control - Otter Lake Animal Care Center 3. Assessor - Anoka County 4. Auditor - Abdo, Abdo and Eick, Inc. 5. A. Cable TV Representative B. Alternate A. - Sanna Buckbee B. - Ry -Chet Gaustad 6. Centerville Centennial Fire District Steering Committee Members - Tom Wilharber - Sanna Buckbee 7. Circle Pines/Lexington Police Liaison - Tom Wilharber 8. City Attorney - Barna, Guzy & Steffen, Ltd. 9. Celebration Committee Representative - Mary Jo Helmbrecht 10. City Engineer - H.R. Greene Consulting Engineerings 11. City Forester - DNR - Art Widerstrom - Laura Powers 12. Centerville Economic Development Task Force - Tim Rehbein - Dan Tourville - Paul Montain - John Magill - Mary Capra 13. Centerville Economic Development Liaison - Theresa Brenner 14. Drainage Ordinance Committee - Staff 15. Drug Testing - HNSA 16 Emergency Services Directors (Civil Defense) Milo Bennett - Paul Palzer Joel Heckman 17. Fire Marshall - Milo Bennett 18. Fire Protection - Centennial Fire District 19. Housing and Redevelopment Authority (HRA) - Anoka County HRA - Theresa Brenner 20, Health Officer - Laura Powers 21. Intergovernmental Relations Representative - Tom Wilharber 22. Municipal Financial Advisor - Ehlers and Associates 21 Official Depository - Firstar State Bank -Hugo and Twin City 24. Federal Savings and Loan - Maplewood, 4M and 4M+ Funds, Smith Barney 25. Official Newspaper - Press Publications 26. Park and Recreation Committee - Dale Larson - Michael Navin - Steve Brown - Richard Thompson - Doug Porter 27. Park and Recreation Committee Liaison - Laura Powers 28. Planning and Zoning Commission - Kathy Welk - Allen LaMotte - Katrina Vermeulen - Linda Broussard- Vickers - John Buckbee 29. Planning and Zoning Commission Liaison - Mary Jo Helmbrecht 30. Police Protection - Circle - Lexington Police Department 31. Recycling Coordinator - Randy Hagerty 32. Responsible Authority - Jim March 33. Rice Creek Watershed District Representative - Sanna Buckbee 34. Senior Transportation Representative - Staff 35. Solid Waste Representative - Staff 36. Weed Inspector - Tom Wilharber Passed by the City Council of the City of Centerville this 14th day of January, 1998, Mayor Tom Wilharber ATTEST: Ry -Chel Gaustad, CMC City Clerk *Amended August 12, 1998 JuL 4e IC I.-- - S ®NINE EXCAVA IN C PHONM(612)4414"NFAX .- (612)9 41 -6109 12669 Meadewvale Road Elk River, Ma 555M Avgust21, 1998 Paul Palzer City of Centerville 1890 Main Street Centerville, mN 55098 RS: Parkview Addition: House Demolish PROPOSAL: Demolish house and haul away. Lump Sum Price: $ 5,500.00 "Foundation blocks to be boned on site under separate bid item. (Time Schedule Per Jerry Bonine: Monday (Aug. 24th) or Friday (Aug. 28th). If you have any questions please call us at your convenience. Thank you. 5ificerely, Nancy Bonine August 21, 1998 CENTER VILLA F - -- _ R I- r d 5C -LE OUTLOT A —� 1 r - i fi - v �Ii 2 o a c)OLOT 8 2 I i r 1 / i r 1 r � ' l _ rte � f i I I � i * (Iwlef 1,52('i .4; t' .SIP. %0 --- - - - - -- -- - - - - -- —_ __ Tile- ff�elc iV155114 i San: by: `IELL1N3S /'NEE<ENDERS 6127557258 08;24198 1 :28P Job 449 Page 112 y GREGORY J. HELLINGS Attorney at Law 13000 Crooked Lake Blvd. Coon Rapids, MN 55448 (612) 755 -0576 FAX: (612) 755 -7256 August 24, 1998 City of Centerville Attention City Council 1880 Main Street _ Centerville, MN 55038 Ile: Prosecution Services Dear Mayor Wilharber and Council Members: You recent decision to retain another firm to represent the Citv of Centerville came as a complete surprise to me- While I knew that the City was requesting proposals from other firms, I assumed that there would be interviews and that I would be informed as to what was happening in this process. I submitted a proposal and the next I heard was n August 21, 1998 when I received correspondence form the City Administrator advising me that effective i=cdiatel I was no longer the City Attorney. I can understand the immediate transition for the Civil portion of the contract since that is relatively simple to accomplish. However, I am writing to request that the City Council reconsider their decision to immediately transfer the prosecution portion of the legal services contract. In my ?l years as Prosecutor for the City of Centerville, I have received nothing but praise for my work from both the Circle PineAxxington Police Department and .Anoka County Court Administration. I have worked very hard and, t believe, gained the respect of all involved with providing prosecution services to the City of Centerville I respectfully request that the Council reconsider transferring this portion of the contract. If, in fact, the Council determines that transferring the prosecution services is in the best interests of the City, I believe the transition date should he January 1, 1999 for several reasons. First and foremost the Court is currently setting cases into November and I have already prepared for most of the cases set into October As such, I am already familiar with these cases and the City has already paid me the majority of preparation time involved with these cases, It doesn't make sense to pav another attorney to prepare these cases since the work has already been done. Secondly, The Citv of Centerville court calendars have been set for 1998 to coincide with the prosection calendars fo- my other cities in Anoka County. The City receives a substantial monetary savings in dividing the time spent in Court with my other cities. Sant Oy: HhLL1NUb[VVtt Kt N'.)t HC b1L /bb /ebb 06124788 1:28F'M 100 448 Page 2/2 Please contact me if you require additional information or assistance. I sincerely hope that you wi!I reconsider your recent action as it regards the prosecution services. Very lyyours: Gregory J. Hellin s GJI4/pmh cc: Joel Heckman, Acting Police Chief August 17, 1998 Mr. Greg Hellings 13000 Crooked Lake Boulevard Coon Rapids, MN 55448 == Dear Greg, As you are aware, the City Council has adopted a policy to review the services of all consultants on a regular basis. The Council reviewed all written proposals in regards to the position of City Attorney. I am writing to inform you ry that the City Council elected to select the firm Barna, Go and Steffen, Ltd to represent Centerville as the City s legal attorney effective immediately. On behalf of the entire City and the City Council, I want to thank you for your years of service to the City of Centerville. I will be contacting you to request any files that you may have concerning the City. Everyone wishes you much success in your future endeavors. Sincerely, Jim March City Administrator cc. City Council ^ � CENTERVILLE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE REGULAR MEETING MINUTES TUESDAY July 22, 1998 Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, the Centerville Hcen^miz Wvsln1Jment Committee held their reuular scheduled meeLioo o'/ juiv 02, 199s. Chairperson Tim Renbine calleo the meetino ho rrder at 7:10 P.M. Presents Mary Cenura. Theresa w,`ennep J41 March, John Nauill, Dan Tourville. others wresent: Pen"v Simonsen, Mn Desi?n ream. and Brian Hansen, [entev SLrew-� resident. = 8 -'W_1/S9o.tie Art- Motion by Mary Capra to approve the Moy 1918 meeting minu/tss, second by Tim Rehbine. kil in favor. J\ulp,-1141hyn,wes- Motion by i`iary Capra to approve the June 1096 meeting minmes second by Tim Rehbine, Dan Tourville: abstain, all others in favor. DO VnionnAgnity? & A oI Penny Simonsen from the Minnesota Design Team was present fcr an unbate on hvw the committee is moving alonj on oeals for their ujcoming visit in 52ptember. She stated she would like to have spmenne from the Ceentv Highway Department available at one oi we *eetinos to answer any ouestimws repardin= the future oi Main street. /heresa Brenner noted chanqes to the Desigo Team schejule, 3�'e also verified that all facilities that are oo the scheWule or,: available for those time slots. Eke is curnenily working no a notebook for the besign Team members io foiJeW. Tim Aehhine and john hagil> have been workinn nc ihn bonne, oroi*ct for fund raising and have 30 cnn'irmed a�s t tolw.wo per ad. Mary Capra has been wcrkino on the lod4inn and i� getting close to having all the host families in Place. jim March out an article in the newsletter For oublicity tha� went out to residents in July. He is also working on a ooster contest for the children. HE stated it hes alsu been in the church bulletin. Tnercsa Brenner stated a direct mail survey still needs to be dune around the beoinning of August. She will also be recruiting volunteers at the Ciiv Celebration booth. Tim Rshbine has lined no a bus for a tour of the city. Rehbein Transit has agreed to donate ti/e bus and duiver. He will need to work on the route and line no a ccuole of soaakers for the Lour. ' Penny Simonsen handed out four disposable caweras to dhe committee for distribution to residents to take pictures around town that they feel are important to thew or things they would like to see changed. Penny Simonsen informed the committee that Lucy Thompson will be her co–leader. She is currently a St. Paul City Planner. Penny stated the committee will need to supplv at least one zoning mao, two large downtown maps, and four address maps for the Design Team to use for their presentation boards. Thev wueld also need a copy of the lateK [cnp Plan available. Nixed Use Zoning – Motion by Mary Capra to table discussion or mixed use zoning until the Desiun team results come back. Second— by ben Tourvjlle. All in favor. � Oblectivet Motion by Tim Rehbine to ask City Council to cunfinue receivi;/, the orofits from the newsletter aos for Fond raising to we usaJ on city promotions such as, monuments. street bonners. e.c. becond by John Magill" All in ra/er^ Welcome Neighbor Packets – It was decidcd to Uut the Porofolius out Fit the City Celebration. 7he coUPcn idea was tableJ until later this fall" 1"t Remove from the egenda. serri Therpsa Brenner stated the conplex is now full and has a waiti/`� list, 5hurnoaier_ Fire .Tnudi [/an Touoville stateci thp Mayor is Ucing to start wynhinA o`, tw- bia,es and vrher items. Hp would like to see K remain in the c�cm���nit� Li-re c m e wtliLv w a!nt_kwa1r e! 3rville Hughes will be p,`esented his award at the July 2a, 19&- City Council meeting. Liferime smczial recognition awards will be eye/"Vu to ["arles Peltier, Francis In i`|cnte, and Francis X. La valle. Au 1 , u !'|u010n oy johv Nagill to ad`our// We meeLi"v 01 6110 Kk, seCU/'� by Mary Capra. Ali in Favor. Respectfu!ly Submitted. [��nel} Westbrock Deputy Clerk C I T Y O F NO 1A ES CERTIFICATION OF ORDINANCE NO. 95 - 04 STATE OF MINNESOTA) COON 'Il' O1- ANOKA ) CTTI' OT, LINO LAKES ) 1_ the undersigned, being the duly qualified and uclim_ Cluk- Treanwer of the City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota, do hereby certify that I ha�c carelidly compared the attached and foregoing Copy of Resolution No 95 - 04 with the original thereof'on file in ny Olce, and the same is a full, u11e and complete copy inwbr as the some relates to SIIOIZF.LAND 1NIANAGI'_Aivour oVE1 .w olumAIVCF \\ 'Muss my hand as said (duk= frc;lsurcr ?Hd the (0 in"w1c Sad Of the ('iic Ilu. 17111 d i% �I ilusust, I`) Manlyn G `Anderson, Clerk - Treasurer (SEAL) ORDINANCE NO. 04 - 95 ' 0 r I s Council Member Elliott introduced the following Ordinance summary and moved its adoption. Chapter 1102 Shoreland Management Overlay Ordinance of the City Zoning Ordinance was adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council on April 10, 1995. Following is a summary of the provision of that Ordinance as adopted. A complete copy of the Ordinance is available for public review at City Hall, 1189 Main Street, Lino Lakes, MN., between the hours of 7:30 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday. The Ordinance shall take effect and be in force 30 days following its publication. CHAPTER 1102 SHORELAND MANAGEMENT OVERLAY ORDINANCE SUMMARY 1102.01 Statutory Authorization and Policy 1102.02 General Provisions 1102.03 Definitions 1102.04 Administration 1102.05 Shoreland overlay District 1102.06 Shoreland Overlay District Uses 1102.07 Zoning and Water Supply /Sanitary Provisions 1102.08 Nonconformities 1102.09 Shoreland Alterations 1102.10 Special Provisions for Commercial, Industrial, Public/ Semipublic, Agricultural, Forestry and Extractive Uses and Mining of Metallic Minerals and Peat 1102.11 Water Supply and Sewage Treatment 1102.12 Subdivision /Platting Provisions 1102.13 Planned Development Overlays (PDOS) 1102.01 Statutory Authorization and Policy,, ATTEST Vernon F_ Reinert, Mayor Marlyn G. Anderson, City Clerk Motion for adoption of the foregoing ordinance was seconded by Council Member Kuethe, and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: Bergeson, C11io[t, Kuether, Neal, Reinert. The following voted against same: None. Whereupon said ordinance was declared duly passed and adopted. Council Member Elliott introduced the following Ordinance and moved its adoption. i ORDINANCE N0. 04 - 95 CHAPTER 1102 SHORELAND MANAGEMENT OVERLAY ORDINANCE 1102.01 Statutory Authorization and Policy 1102.02 General Provisions 1102.03 Definitions 1102.04 Administration 1102.05 Shoreland Overlay District 1102.06 Shoreland Overlay District Uses 1102.07 Zoning and Water Supply /Sanitary Provisions 1102.08 Nonconforrnities 1102.09 Shoreland Alterations 1102.10 Special Provisions for Commercial, Industrial, Public/Semipublic. Agricultural. Forestry and Extractive Uses and Mining of Metallic Minerals and Peat 1102.11 Water Supply and Sewage Treatment 1102.12 Subdivision/Platting Provisions 1102.13 Planned Development Overlays (PDOS) 1102.01 Statutory Authorization and Policy Subdivision 1. Statutory Authorization. Local government units are required to adopt shoreland management ordinances in Minnesota Statutes 103F.201 to 1031 This Shoreland Overlay District Ordinance is adopted pursuant to these authorizations and policies and the planning and zoning enabling legislation in Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 462. Subd. 2. Policies. The uncontrolled use of shorelands of the City of lino Lakes. Minnesota affects the public health, safety and general welfare not only by contributing Io pollution of public waters, but also by impairing the local tax base. 'Therefore, it is in the best interests of the public health, safety and welfare to provide for the wise subdivision, use and development of shorelands of .public waters. The Legislature of Minnesota has delegated responsibility to local governments of the state to regulate the subdivision, use and development of shorelands of public waters and thus preserve and enhance the quality of surface waters, conserve the economic and natural environmental values of shorelands, and provide for the wise use of waters and related land resources. The responsibility for the management of shoreland areas is hereby recognized by the City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota. 1102.02 General Provisions Subdivision 1. Jurisdiction. The provisions of this ordinance shall apply to the shorelands of the public water bodies as classified in 1102.05 of this ordinance and as shown on the Official Zoning Map of the City of Lino Lakes as being located within the Shoreland Overlay District- A body of water created by a private user where there was no previous shoreland may, at the discretion of the City, be exempt from this ordinance. Page 1 ' r Subd. 2. Cornpliance. The use of any shoreland of public waters; the size and shape of leis; the use, size, type and locations of structures on lots; the installation and maintenance of water supply and waste treatment systems; the grading and filling of any shoreland area; the cutting of shoreland vegetation; and the subdivision of land shall be in full compliance with the terms of this ordinance and other applicable regulations. Subd. 3 Enforcement. The Zoning Administrator is responsible for the administration and enforcement of this ordinance. Any violation of the provisions of this ordinance or failure to comply with any of its requirements (including violations of conditions and safeguards established in connection with grants of variances or conditional uses) shall constitute a misdemeanor and shall be punishable as defined by law. Violations of this ordinance can occur regardless of whether or not a permit is required for a regulated activity pursuant to 1102.04, Subd. I of this ordinance. Subd. 4. Interpretation. In their interpretation and application, the provisions of this ordinance shall be held to be minimum requirements and shall be liberally construed in favor of the governing body and shall not be deemed a limitation or repeal of any other powers granted by State Statutes. The approximate boundaries of the Shoreland Overlay District are indicated on the Official Zoning Map of the City of Lino Lakes, and attachments thereto. Exact determination of the boundaries will be made by the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, Division of Waters. Subd. S. Severability. If any section, clause, provision, or portion of this ordinance is adjudged unconstitutional or invalid by a court of competent jurisdiction, the remainder of this ordinance shall not be affected thereby. Subd. 6. Abrogation and Greater Restrictions. It is not intended by this ordinance to repeal, abrogate, or impair any existing easements, covenants, or deed restrictions. Where the conditions imposed by any provision of this ordinance are either more restrictive or less restrictive than comparable conditions imposed by any other law, ordinance, statute, resolution, or regulation of any kind, the regulations which are more restrictive, or which impose higher standards or requirements shall prevail All other ordinances inconsistent with this ordinance are hereby repealed to the extent of the inconsistency only. 1102.03 Definitions. Unless specifically defined below, words or phrases used in this ordinance shall be interpreted so as to give them the same meaning as they have in common usage and so as to give this ordinance its most reasonable application_ For the purpose of this ordinance, the words "must" and "shall" are mandatory and not permissive. All distances, unless otherwise specified, shall be measured horizontally - Subdivision 1. Accessory structure or facility. "Accessory structure" or "facility" means any building or improvement subordinate to a principal use which, because of the nature of its use, can reasonable be located at or greater than normal structure setbacks. Subd. 2. Bluff. "Bluff' means a topographic feature such as a hill, cliff, or embankment having the following characteristics (an area with an average slope of less than 18 percent over a distance for 50 feet or more shall not be considered part of the bluff): A. Part of all of the feature is located in a shoreland area; Page 2 L B. The slope rises at least 25 feet above the ordinary high water level of the waterbody; C. The grade of the slope from the toe of the bluff to a point 25 feet or more above the ordinary high water level averages 30 percent or greater; and D. The slope must drain toward the waterbody. Subd. 3. Bluff impact zone. "Bluff impact zone" means a bluff and land located within 20 feet from the top of a bluff. Subd. 4. Boathouse. "Boathouse" means an accessory structure designed and used solely for the storage of boats and boating equipment. Subd. 5. Building line. "Building line" means a line parallel to a lot line or the ordinary high water level at the required setback beyond which a structure may not extend. Subd. 6. Clear Cutting. "Clear cutting" means the removal of an entire stand of trees. Subd. 7. Resort planned development overlay. "Resort planned development overlays" are typically uses that provide transient, short -term lodging spaces, rooms, or parcels and their operations are essentially service-oriented- For example, hotel /motel accommodations, resorts, recreational vehicle and camping parks, and other primarily service - oriented activities are resort planned unit developments. Subd. 8. Commercial use. "Commercial use" means the principal use of land or buildings for the sale, lease, rental, or trade of products, goods, and services. Subd. 9. Commissioner. "Commissioner" means the commissioner of the Department of Natural Resources. Subd. 10. Conditional use. "Conditional use" means a land use or development as defined by ordinance that would not be appropriate generally but may be allowed %with appropriate restrictions as provided by official controls upon a finding that certain conditions as detailed in the official zoning ordinance exist, the use or development conforms to the comprehensive land use plan of the community, and the use is compatible with the existing neighborhood. Subd. 1I. Deck. "Deck" means a horizontal, unenclosed platform with or without attached railings, seats, trellises, or other features, attached or functionally related to a principal use or site and at any point extending more than three feet above the ground. Subd. 12. Dwelling site. "Dwelling site" means a designated location for residential use by one or more persons using temporary or movable shelter, including camping and recreational vehicle sites. Subd. 13. Dwelling unit. "Dwelling unit" means any structure or portion of a structure or other shelter designed as short- or long -term living quarters for one or more persons, including rental or timeshare accommodations such as motel, hotel, and resort rooms and cabins. Page 3 , J Subd. 14. Extractive use. "Extractive use" means the use of land for surface or st )surface removal of sand, gravel, rock, industrial minerals, other nonmetallic minerals, and peat not regulated under Minnesota Statutes, sections 9.44 to 9.51. Subd. 15. Forest land conversion. "Forest land conversion" means the clear cutting of forested land to prepare for a new land use other than reestablishment of a subsequent forest stand. Subd. 16. Hardship. "Hardship" means the property in question cannot be put to reasonable use under the conditions allowed by the official controls; the plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to his property, not created by the landowner; and the variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the Iocality. Economic considerations alone shall not constitute a hardship if a reasonable use for the property exists under terms of the official controls. Subd. 17. Height of building. "Height of building" means the vertical distance between the highest adjoining ground level at the building or ten feet above the lowest ground level, whichever is lower, and the highest point of a flat roof or average height of the highest gable of a pitch or hipped roof. Subd. 18. Industrial use. "Industrial use' means the use of land or buildings for the production, manufacture, warehousing, storage, or transfer of goods, products, commodities, or other wholesale items. Subd. 19. Intensive vegetation clearing. "Inte.nsive vegetation clearing" means the complete removal of trees or shrubs in a contiguous patch, strip, row, or block. Subd. 20. Lot. "Lot" means a designated parcel, tract or area of land established by plat, subdivision, or as otherwise permitted by law, to be used developed or built upon as a unit. Subd. 21. Lot. width. "Lot width" means the shortest distance between lot lines measured at the midpoint of the building line. Subd. 22. Nonconforming Use. "Nonconforming use" means any legal use, structure or parcel of land already in existence, recorded, or authorized before the adoption of official controls or amendments thereto that would not have been permitted to become established under the terms of the official controls as now written, if the official controls had been in effect prior to the date it was established, recorded or authorized. Subd. 23. Open Space. Undeveloped land of the subdivided property providing visual expanses and recreational areas clear of obstructions other than natural vegetation, or structures directly related to the use and enjoyment of these spaces. Open spaces may include natural habitats, places for neighborhood recreation, and pedestrian corridors. Subd. 24. Ordinary high water level. "Ordinary high water level" means the boundary of public waters and wetlands, and shall bean elevation delineating the highest water level which has been maintained for a sufficient period of time to leave evidence upon the landscape, commonly that point where the natural vegetation changes from predominantly aquatic to predominantly terrestrial.. Page 4 t, Surd. 25. Planned development overlay. "Planned development overlay" means a type of development characterized by a unified site design for a number of dwelling units or dwelling sites on a parcel, whether for sale, rent, or lease, and also usually involving clustering of these units or sites to provide areas of common open space, density increase, and a mix of structure types and land uses. These developments may be organized and operated as condominiums, time -share condominiums, cooperatives, full fee ownership, commercial enterprises, or any combination of these, or cluster subdivisions of dwelling units, residential condominiums, townhouses, apartment buildings, campgrounds, recreational vehicle parks, resorts, hotels, motels, and conversions of structures and land uses to these uses. Subd. 26. Public waters. "Public waters" means any waters as defined in Minnesota Statutes, section 105.37, subdivisions 14 and 15. Surd. 27. Residential planned development overlay. "Residential plan ned developrent overlay" means a use where the nature of residency is nontransient and the major or primary focus of the development is not service - oriented. For example, residential apartments, manufactured home parks, time -share condominiums, townhouses, cooperatives, and full fee ownership residences would be considered as residential planned development overlays. To qualify as a residential planned development overlay, a development must contain at least five dwelling units or sites. Subd. 28. Semipublic use. "Semipublic use" means the use of land by a private, nonprofit organization to provide a public service that is ordinarily open to some persons outside the regular constituency of the organization. Subd. 29. Sensitive resource management. "Sensitive resource management" means the preservation and management of areas unsuitable for development in their natural state due to constraints such as shallow soils over groundwater or bedrock, highly erosive or expansive soils, steep slopes, susceptibility to flooding, or occurrence of flora or fauna in need of special protection. Subd. 30. Setback. "Setback" means the minimum horizontal distance between a structure, sewage treatment system, or other facility and an ordinary high water level, sewage treatment system, road, highway, property line, or other facility. Subd. 31. Sewage treatment system. "Sewage treatment system" means a septic tank- and soil absorption system or other individual or cluster type sewage treatment system as described and regulated in Section 1102.11 of this ordinance. Subd. 32. Sewer system. "Sewer system" means pipelines or conduits, pumping stations, and force main, and all other construction, devices, appliances, or appurtenances used for conducting sewage or industrial waste or other wastes to a point of ultimate disposal. Subd. 33. Shore impact zone. "Shore impact zone" means land located between the ordinary high water level of a public water and a line parallel to it at a setback of 50 percent of the structure setback. Subd. 34. Shoreland. "Shoreland" means land located within 1,000 feet from the ordinary high water level of the lakes and land located within 300 feet from the streams Page 5 classified in Section 1102.05 or the landward extent of a floodplain designated by ordinance on a :fiver or stream, whichever is greater. The limits of shorelands may be reduced whenever the waters involved are bounded by topographic divides which extend landward from the waters for lesser distances and when approved by the Comissioner. Subd. 35. Significant historic site. "Significant historic site" means any archaeological site, standing structure, or other property that meets the criteria for eligibility to the National Register of Historic Places or is listed in the State Register of Historic Sites, or is determined to bean unplatted cemetery that falls under the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Section 307.08. An historic site meets these criteria if it is presently listed on either register or if it is determined to meet the qualifications for listing after review by the Minnesota state archaeologist or the director of the Minnesota Historical Society. All unplatted cemeteries are automatically considered to be significant historic sites. Subd. 36. Steep slope. "Steep slope" means land where development is either not recommended or described as poorly suited due to slope steepness and the site's soil characteristics as mapped and described in available county soil surveys or other reports, unless appropriate design and construction techniques and farming practices are used in accordance with the provisions of this ordinance. Where specific information is not available, steep slopes are lands having average slopes over 12 percent, as measured over horizontal distances of 50 feet or more that are not bluffs. Subd. 37. Structure. "Structure" means any building or appurtenance, including decks mobile homes, docks and boat launches, except aerial or underground utility lines, such as sewer, electric, telephone, telegraph, gas lines, towers, poles, and other supporting facilities. Subd. 38. Subdivision. "Subdivision" means land that is divided for the purpose of sale, rent, or lease, including planned developments overlays. Subd. 39. Surface water- orientedconunercialuse. "Surface water- oriented commercial use" means the use of land for commercial purposes, where access to and use of a surface water feature is an integral part of the normal conductance of business. Plannas, resorts, and restaurants with transient docking facilities are examples of such use. Subd. 40. VVater- oriented accessory structure or facility. "Water- oriented accessory structure or facility" means a small, above ground building or other improvement, except stairways, fences, docks, and retaining walls, which, because of the relationship of its use to a surface water feature, reasonable needs to be located closer to public waters than the normal structure setback. Examples of such structures and facilities include boathouses, gazebos, screen houses, fish houses, pump houses, and detached decks. 1102.04 Administration. Subdivision 1. Permits Required A. Permit Required. A building permit is required for the construction of buildings or building additions (including such related activities as construction of decks and signs), the installation and/or alteration of sewage treatment systems, and a grading permit for those grading and filling activities not exempted by Section 1102.09 of this ordinance. Application Page 6 for a permit shall be made to the Zoning Administrator on forms provided. The application shall include the necessary information so that the Zoning Administrator can determine the site's suitability for the intended use and that a compliant sewage treatment system will be provided. B. A building permit authorizing an addition to an existing structure shall stipulate that an identified nonconforming sewage treatment system, as defined in Section 1102. 11, shall be reconstructed or replaced in accordance with the provisions of this ordinance. Subd. 2. Certificate of Zoning Compliance. The Zoning Administrator shall issue a certificate of zoning compliance for each activity requiring a permit as specified in 1102.04, Subd. 1 of this ordinance. This certificate will specify that the use of land conforms to the requirements of this ordinance. Any use, arrangement, or construction at variance with that authorized by permit shall be deemed a violation of this ordinance and shall be punishable as provided in 1102.02, Subd. 3 of this ordinance. Subd. 3. Variances. A. Variances may only be granted in accordance with Minnesota Statues, Chapter 462, as applicable. A variance may not circumvent the general purposes and intent of this ordinance. No variance may be granted that would allow any use that is prohibited in the zoning district in which the subject property is located. Conditions may be imposed in the gran ting of a variance to ensure compliance and to protect adjacent properties and the public interest. in considering a variance request, the zoning Administrator must also consider whether the property owner has reasonable use of the land without the variance, whether the property is used seasonally or year- round, whether the variance is being requested solely on the basis of economic considerations, and the characteristics of development on adjacent properties. B. The City Council shall hear and decide requests for variances in accordance with the rules that it has adopted for the conduct of business in Section 5, Subd. 7 of the City Zoning Ordinance. When a variance is approved after the Department of Natural Resources has formally recommended denial in the hearing record, the notification of the approved variance - required in 1 102.04, Subd. 413 shall also include the City Council's summary of the public recorditestimony and the findings of facts and conclusions which supported the issuance 01 the variance. C. For existing developments, the applications for variance must clearly demonstrate whether a conforming sewage treatment system is present for the intended use of the property. The variance, if issued, must require reconstruction of a nonconforming sewage treatment system. Subd. 4. Notification to the Department of Natural Resources A. Copies of all notices of any public hearings to consider variances, amendments, or conditional uses in the Shoreland Overlay District must be sent to the Commissioner of the Department of Natural Resources or the Commissioner's designated representative and postmarked at least ten (10) days before the hearings. Notices of hearing to consider proposed subdivision /plats must include copies of the subdivision /plat. Page 7 B. A copy of approved amendments and subdivisions /plats, and final decisions granting variances or conditional uses in the Flood Plain or Shoreland Management Districts must be 'sent to the Commissioner or the Commissioner's designated representative and postmarked within ten (10) days of final action. 1102.05 Shoreland Overlay District i Subdivision 1. Establishment of Shoreland Overlay District. The public waters of the City of Lino Lakes have been classified consistent with the criteria found in Minnesota Regulations, Part 6120.3300. The Shoreland Overlay District for the waterbodies listed below is that land within 1,000 feet of the ordinary high water level of the Takes, and 300 feet from a river or stream as shown on the Official Zoning Map. Protected Water A. Natural Environment Lakes Inventory I.D.# Unnamed 2 -1 Peltier Lake 2-4 George Watch Lake 2 -5 Marshan Lake 2 -7 Rice Lake 2 -8 Wards Lake 2 -10 Sherman Lake 2 -11 Cedar lake 2 -12 Amelia Lake 2 -14 Rondeau Lake 2 -15 Wilkinson Lake 62 -43 Protected Water B. Recreational Develoornent Lak Inventory LD.# Otter Lake 2 -3 Centerville Lake 2 -6 Reshanau Lake 2 -9 Baldwin Lake 2 -13 Protected Water C. General Develooment Lake Inventory I.D.# Bald Eagle Lake 62 -2 Protected Watercourse D. Tributary Rivers and Streams Legal Description Rice Creek From Basin 740 to Basin 13 Hardwood Creek From T31N, R22W, Sect_ 12 to Basin 4 Page 8 Subd. 2. Establishment of Official Zoning Map. The Official Zoning Map, together with all materials attached thereto is hereby adopted by reference and declared to be a part of this ordinance. The attached material shalll include the Protected Waters Inventory Map for Anoka County. The Official Zoning Map shall be on file in the Office of the Zoning Administrator_ Subd. 3. Land Use District Descriptions. A. Criteria for Designation. The land use districts in B below and the delineation of a land use district's boundaries on the Official Zoning Map, must be consistent with the goals, policies, and objectives of the comprehensive land use plan. B. Land Use District Descriptions. The land use districts and the allowable land uses therein for the given classifications of waterbodies, shall be properly delineated on the Official Zoning Map for the shorelands of the City of Lino Lakes. The designated land use districts shall be in conformance with the criteria specified in Minnesota Regulation, Part 6120.3200, Subp. 3. 1102.06 Shoreland Overlay District Uses Subdivision 1. Permitted Uses. The permitted uses in the Shoreland Overlay District are those uses allowed and regulated by the applicable underlying zoning district as indicated on the OCGcial Zoning Map of the City of Lino Lakes. Subd. 2. Conditional Uses. A. The conditional uses in the Shoreland Overlay District are those uses allowed and regulated on a conditional basis by the applicable underlying zoning district as indicated on the Official Zoning Map of the City of Lino Lakes. B. Boathouses. C. Evaluation Criteria. A thorough evaluation of tire waterbody and the topographic_ vegetation and soils conditions on the site must be made to ensure: 1. the prevention of soil erosion or other possible pollution of public waters, both during and after construction in accordance with Chapter 1101 and 1105 of the City Code; 2_ the visibility of structures and other facilities as viewed from public waters is limited; 3. the site is adequate for water supply and on -site sewage treatment; and 4. the types, uses and numbers of watercraft that the project will generate are compatible in relation to the suitability of public waters to safely accommodate these watercraft. D. Conditions attached to conditional use permits. The City of Lino Ickes, upon pane e consideration of the criteria listed above and the purposes of this ordinance, shall attach such conditions to the issuance of the conditional use permits as it deems necessary to fulfill the I urposes of this ordinance and Section 5, Subd. 5 of the City Zoning Ordinance. Such conditions may include, but are not limited to, the following: I. increased setbacks from the ordinary high water level; 2 limitations on the natural vegetation to be removed or the requirement that additional vegetation be planted; and 3. special provisions for the location, design, and use of structures, watercraft launching and docking areas, and vehicle parking areas. E. The City Council shall hear and decide applications for conditional uses permissible under this ordinance in accordance with Conditional Use Permit approval process of the City Code. Subd. 3. Permitted Accessory Uses. A. The permitted accessory uses in the Shoreland Overlay District are those uses allowed and regulated as accessory uses by the applicable underlying zoning district as indicated on the Official Zoning Map of the City of Lino Lakes. B. Water - oriented accessory structures are permitted when constructed in accordance with the design criteria of Section 1102.07, Subd, 213. C. Dock and boat launches are permitted provided they are constructed on the same lot as the principal structure. Subd. 4, Prohibited Uses. Any uses which are not permitted or conditional uses as regulated by the applicable underlying zoning district as indicated on the Official Zoning Map are not permitted. 1102.07 "Zoning and Water Supply /Sanitary Provisions Subdivision 1. Lot Area and Width Standards. The following standards shall apply to ail lots within the Shoreland Overlay District provided that the resulting total development density in the shoreland area does not exceed the total City -wide shoreland density allowed based on State of Minnesota shoreland standards. The City, in its evaluation of any development, shall evaluate the proposed development in light of the development capacity of the City -wide Shoreland Overlay District. Where the requirements of the underlying zoning district are more or less restrictive than those set forth herein, the more restrictive standards shall apply. A. Residential (R -1, R -IX, R -2, R -3, R-4) Zoning Districts. NE RD GD T 1. Lot Area Per Unit a. Unsewered* 10 acres 10 acres 10 acres 10 Acres Page 10 b. Sewered Abutting ** Single Family 20,000 20,000 20,000 Two Family/ Duplex 8,775 8,775 8,775 Triplex /Quad/ Townhome 6,000 6,000 6,000 c. Sewer Non- Abutting *' Single Family 10,800 10,800 10,800 Two Family/ Duplex 8,775 8,775 8,775 Triplex /Quad/ Townhome 5,000 5,000 5,000 2. Lot Width /Base Lot * ** a. Unsewered* 330 330 330 330 b. Sewered Abutting Single Family 80 80 80 80 Two Family/ Duplex 130 130 130 130 Triplex /Quad/ Townhome 130 130 130 130 c. Sewered Non - Abutting Single Family 80 80 80 130 Two Family/ Duplex 130 130 130 130 Triplex /Quad/ Townhome 130 130 I30 130 B. Commercial and Industrial (NB, LB, GB, CB, SC, LI, GI) Zoning Districts. NL RD GD 1' I . Lot Area a. Unsewered 1 acre 1 acre I acre 1 acre b. Sewered Abutting Commercial 1 acre 1 acre. I acre Industrial 1 acre 1 acre 1 acre c. Sewered Non - Abutting Commercial ** ** ** ** Industrial. I acre 1 acre 1 acre 1 acre 2. Lot Widths * ** a. Unsewered Commercial t00 100 100 100 Industrial 150 150 150 150 b. Sewered Abutting Commercial 100 100 100 100 Industrial 150 150 150 150 c_ Sewered Non- Abutting Commercial Industrial 150 150 150 150 Lot size requirement in unsewered area are delineated in Section 4, Subdivision 17 and Section 6, Subdivisions 2 and 3. * Lot area and width requirements along rivers in sewered areas and commercial zoning districts in sewered areas will be delineated by the standards of the base zoning districts. * "* Lot widths shall be measured at both the front building setback line and at the setback from the ordinary high water level. C. Additional Special Provisions. 1. Only land above the ordinary high water level of public waters and outside existing watercourses can be used to meet the lot area standards. 2. The shoreland lot width standards must be met at both the ordinary high water level and the building setback line. I. All single family, two family, triplex, quadraminium, townhouse, commercial and industrial subdivisions must provide a grading and drainage plan for review and approval of the City Engineer and Rice Creek Watershed District_ The grading and drainage plan shall include: a. Compliance for the impervious surface standards of the. respective zoning district. b. The subdivision or lot development shall provide for the collection and treatment of storm water in compliance with the Lino Lakes local Storm Water Management Plan if determined that the site improvements will result in increased runoff directly entering a public water. All grading and drainage plans shall require review and approval by the City Engineer and the Rice Creek Watershed District. c. Measures to be taken for the treatment of storm water runoff and /or prevention of storm water from directly entering a public water. The measures may include, but not be limited to the following: Page 12 1. Appurtenances as sedimentation basins, debris basins, desilting basins or silt traps. 2. Installation of debris guards and microsilt basins on storm sewer inlets. 3. Use where necessary, oil skimming devices or sump catch basins. 4. Direct drainage away from the lake and into pervious, grassed, yards through site grading, use of gutters and downspouts. 5. Construct sidewalks and driveways of partially pervious raised materials such as decking which has natural earth or other previous material beneath or between the planking. 6. Use grading and construction techniques which encourage rapid infiltration, e.g. sand and gravel under impervious materials with adjacent infiltration swales graded to lead into them. 7. Install berms, water bars, or terraces which temporarily detain water before dispersing it into pervious area. 4_ Impervious surface coverage of lots must not exceed the following percentages of lot area: NE RD G R Single Family Residential 3077 30% 30% 30% Two Family /Duplex 30% 30% 30% 30% Triplex /Quad /Townhomes 35% 35% 35% 35% Commercial /Industrial 60% 60% 60% 60% 5. Medium density residential,commereial, and industrial structures, parking areas, and other facilities shall be treated to reduce visibility as viewed from public waters and adjacent shorelands by vegetation, topography, increased setbacks, or color, assuming summer, leaf -o, conditions. Veg e etativ and topographic screening shall be preserved, if r existing, or may be required to be provided. 6. Accessory structures and facilities shall meet the required principal structure setback and shall be centralized. 7. Multiple family developments shall contain open space meeting the following criteria: a. At least thirty -five (35) percent of the total development area shall be preserved as open space. b. Dwelling units or sites, land covered by road surfaces, parking areas, or structures are developed areas and shall not be included in the computation of minimum open space. Page 13 c al space shall include areas with physic characteristics unsuitable for development in their natural state, and areas containing significant historic sites or unplatted cemeteries. d. The shore impact zone, based on normal structure setbacks, shall be included as open space. At least fifty (50) percent of the shore impact zone area of existing developments or at least seventy (70) percent of the shore impact zone area of new developments shall be preserved in its natural or existing state. 8. Residential subdivisions exceeding those permitted by the lot area standards of Section 1102.07 can only be allowed if designed and approved as a residential planned unit development under Section 110213 of this Ordinance. Subd. 2. Placement, Design, and Height of Structures. A. Placement of Structures on Lots. When more than one setback applies to a site, structures and facilities must be located to meet all setbacks. Where structures exist on the adjoining lots on both sides of a proposed building site, structure setbacks may be altered without a variance to conform to the adjoining setbacks from the ordinary high water level, provided the proposed building site is not located in a shore impact zone_ Structures shall be located as follows. I. Structure and On -site Sewage System Setbacks (in feet) from Ordinary High Water Level. Sewage Classes of Structures Treatment Public Waters Unsewered Sewered System Lakes Natural Environment 150 150 150 Recreational Development 100 75 75 General Development 75 50 50 Rivers and Streams 100 SO 75 One water - oriented accessory structure exclusive of one dock and lake access per individual lot designed in accordance with Section 1102.07, Subd_ 2B of this ordinance may be set back a minimum distance of ten (10) feet from the ordinary high water level. 2. Additional Structure Setbacks. The following additional structure setbacks apply, regardless of the classification of the water body: Setback From: Setback (in feet) a. top of bluff 30 b. unplatted cemetery; 50 Page 14 L c. right -of -way line of federal, state, 40 or county highway; and d. right -of -way line of a town road, 30 public street or other roads or streets not classified. 3. Uses Without Water- oriented Needs. Uses without water - oriented needs must be substantially screened from view from the water by vegetation or topography, assuming summer, leaf -on conditions. 4. Exceptions to Structure Setback Requirements. a. Accessory structures may be located in the front yard of lakeshore properties upon approval of a riparian lot variance. B. Design Criteria for Structures. 1. High Water Elevations. a. Structures must be placed with the lowest floor three feet above the (OHW) Ordinary High Water Level in accordance with the Local Water Management Plan for the City of Lino Lakes. b. Water - oriented structures may have the lowest floor placed lower than the elevation determined in the Local Water Management Plan if the structure is constructed of flood - resistant materials to the elevation, electrical and mechanical equipment is placed above the elevation and, if long duration flooding is anticipated, the structure is built to withstand ice action and wind - driven waves and debris. 2. Water - oriented Accessory Structures. Each lot may have one water- oriented accessory structure not meeting the normal structure setback in 1102.07, Subd_ 2A of this ordinance if this water - oriented structure complies with the following provisions: a. the structure or facility must not exceed ten feet in height, exclusive of safety rails, and cannot occupy an area greater than 250 square feet. Detached decks must not exceed eight feet above grade at any point; b. the setback of the structure or facility from the ordinary high water level must be at least ten (M) feet; c. the structure or facility must be treated to reduce visibility as viewed from public waters and adjacent shorelands by vegetation, topography, increased setbacks or color, assuming summer, leaf -on conditions; d. the roof may be used as a deck with safety rails, but must not be enclosed or used as a storage area; e. the structure or facility must not be designed or used for human habitation and must not contain water supply or sewage treatment facilities; and f. within the shoreland areas of general development and recreational development waterbodies, water - oriented accessory structures used solely for watercraft storage, and including storage or related boating and water - oriented sporting equipment, may occupy an area up to 400 square feet provided the maximum width of the structure is 20 feet as measured parallel to the configuration of the shoreline. 3. Stairways, Lifts, and Landings. Stairways and lifts are the preferred alternative to major topographic alterations for achieving access up and down steep slopes to shore areas. Stairways and lifts must meet the following design requirements: a. stairways and lifts must not exceed four feet in width on residential lots. Wider stairways may be used for commercial properties, public open -space recreational properties and planned development overlays; b. landings for stairways and lifts on residential lots must not exceed 32 square feet in area. Landings larger than 32 square feet may be used for commercial properties, public open -space recreational properties and planned development overlays; c. canopies or roofs are not allowed on stairways, lifts, or landings, d. stairways, lifts, and landings may be either constructed above the ground on posts or pilings, or placed into the ground, provided they are designed and built in a manner that ensures control of soil erosion; e. stairways, lifts, and landings must be located in the most visually inconspicuous portions of lots, as viewed from the surface of the public water assuming summer, leaf -on conditions, whenever practical; and f. facilities such as ramps, lifts, mobility paths for physically handicapped persons are also allowed for achieving access to shore areas, provided that the dimensional and performance standards of subitems (i) to (5) or complied with in addition to the requirements of Minnesota Regulations, Chapter 1340. 4. Significant Historic Sites. No structure may be placed on a significant historic site in a manner that affects the values of the site unless adequate information about the site has been removed and documented in a public repository. 5. Steep Slopes. The Zoning Administrator must evaluate possible soil erosion impacts and development visibility from public waters before issuing a permit for construction of sewage treatment systems, roads, driveways, structures, or other improvements on steep slopes. When determined necessary, conditions must be attached to issued permits to prevent erosion and to preserve existing vegetation screening of structures, vehicles, and other facilities as viewed from the surface of public waters, assuming summer, leaf -on vegetation. C. Height of Structures. All structures shall not exceed 36' in height, except churches and nonresidential agricultural structures. 1102.08 Nonconformities. All legally established nonconformitics as of the date of this ordinance may continue, but they will be managed according to applicable state statutes and other regulations of the City of Lino Lakes for the subjects of alterations and additions, repair after damage, discontinuance of use, and intensification of use; except that the following standards will also apply in the Shoreland Overlay District. Subdivision 1. Construction on nonconforming lots of record. A. Lots of record in the Office of the County Recorder prior to the date of enactment of this ordinance which do not meet the requirements of 1102.07, Subd. 1 may be allowed as building sites without variances from lot size requirements provided: 1. such use is permitted in the underlying zoning district, 2. the lot is and has been in separate ownership from abutting lands at all times since it became substandard, 3. the lot was created compliant with official controls in effect at the time, 4. all other dimensional requirements are complied with insofar as practical, and 5. sewage treatment and setback requirements of this ordinance are met. B. A variance from setback requirements must be obtained before any use or building permit is issued for a lot. In evaluating the variance, the City Council shall consider sewage treatment and water supply capabilities or constraints of the lot and shall deny the variance if adequate facilities cannot be provided. C. If, in a group of two or more contiguous lots under the same ownership, any individual lot does not meet the requirements of Section 1102.07, Subd. 1 of this ordinance the lot must not be considered as a separate parcel of land for the purposes of sale or development. The lot must be combined with the one or more contiguous lots so they equal one or more parcels of (and, each meeting the requirements of Section 1102.07 of this ordinance as much as possible. Subd. 2. Additions /expansions to nonconforming structures. A. All additions or expansions to the outside dimensions of an existing nonconforming structure must meet the setback, height, and other requirements of this ordinance_ Any deviation from these requirements must be authorized by a variance pursuant to 1102.04, Subd_ 3. Page 17 B. Deck additions may be allowed without a variance to a structure not meeting the required setback from the ordinary high water level if all of the following criteria and standards are met: 1. the structure existed on the date the structure setbacks were established; 2. a thorough evaluation of the property and structure reveals no reasonable location for a deck meeting or exceeding the existing ordinary high water level setback of the structure; 3. the deck encroachment toward the ordinary high water level does not exceed 15 percent of the existing setback of the structure from the ordinary high water level or does not encroach closer than 30 feet, whichever is more restrictive, and 4. the deck is constructed primarily of wood, and is not roofed or screened. Subd. 3. Nonconforming sewage treatment systems. A. A sewage treatment system not meeting the requirements of Section 1102.11 of this ordinance must be upgraded, at a minimum, at any time a permit or variance of any type is required for any improvement on, or use of, the property. For the purposes of this provision, a sewage treatment system shall not be considered nonconforming if the only deficiency is the sewage treatment system's improper setback from the ordinary high water level. B. The governing body of the City of Lino Lakes has by formal resolution notified the commissioner of its program to identify nonconforming sewage treatment systems_ The City of Lino Lakes will require upgrading or replacement of any nonconforming system identified by this program within a reasonable period of time which will not exceed 2 years. Sewage systems installed according to all applicable local shoreland management standards adopted under Minnesota Statues, section 103F.211, in effect at the time of installation may be considered as conforming unless they are determined to be failing, except that systems using cesspools, leaching pits, seepage pits, or other deep disposal method, or systems with less soils treatment area separation above groundwater than required by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency's Chapter 7050 for design of on -site sewage treatment systems shall be considered nonconforming_ 1102.09 Shoreland Alterations. Alterations of vegetation and topography in the Shoreland Overlay District will be regulated to prevent erosion into public waters, fix nutrients, preserve shoreland aesthetics, preserve historic values, prevent bank slumping, and protect fish and wildlife habitat. Subdivision 1. Vegetation Alterations. A. Vegetation alteration necessary for the construction of structures, sewage treatment systems, uses permitted in the underlying zoning district and the construction of roads and parking areas regulated by 1102.09, Subd. 3 of this ordinance are exempt from the vegetation alteration standards that follow. Page 18 B. Removal or alteration of natural vegetation, except for agricultural and forest management uses as regulated in Section 1102. 10, shall be restricted to prevent erosion into protected waters, to consume nutrients in the soil, and to preserve shoreland aesthetic. Removal of natural vegetation in the Shoreland Overlay District is allowed subject to the following standards: 1. Clear cutting of natural vegetation is prohibited. 2. Limited clearing of trees and shrubs and cutting, pruning, and trimming of trees is allowed to provide a view to the water from the principal dwelling site and to accommodate the placement of stairways and landings, picnic areas, access paths, beach and watercraft access areas, and permitted water - oriented accessory structures or facilities, provided that: a, the screening of structures, vehicles, or other facilities as viewed from the water, assuming summer, leaf -on conditions, is not substantially reduced; b. along rivers, existing shading of water surfaces is preserved; c, the above provision is not applicable to the removal of trees, limbs, or branches that are dead, diseased, or pose safety hazards. 3. Natural vegetation shall be restored insofar as feasible after any construction project is completed to retard surface runoff and soil erosion. 4. The provisions of this section shall not apply to permitted uses which normally require the removal of natural vegetation. Subd. 2. Topographic Alterations /Grading and Filling. A. Grading, filling and excavations necessary for the construction of structures, sewage treatment systems, driveways and other uses permitted in the underlying zoning district under validly issued construction permits for these facilities do not require the issuance of a separate grading and filling permit. However, the grading and filling standards in this Section must be incorporated into the issuance of permits for construction of structures, sewage treatment systems and driveways. B. Public roads and parking areas are regulated by Section 1102.09, Subd. 3 of this ordinance. C. Notwithstanding Items A and B above, a grading and filling permit, in accordance with Section 4, Subd. 33 of the City Zoning Ordinance, will be required for: 1. the movement of more than ten (10) cubic yards of material on steep slopes or within the shore impact zone; and 2. the movement of more than 50 cubic yards of material per acre. D. The following considerations and conditions must be adhered to during the issuance n--- 10 of construction permits, grading and filling permits, conditional use permits, variances and subdivision approvals: 1. Grading or filling in any wetland must be evaluated to determine the extent of impact to the functions and values of the wetland area in accordance with Section 1104 of the City Code. This evaluation must also include a determination of whether the wetland alteration being proposed requires permits, reviews, or approvals by other local, state, or federal agencies such as a watershed district, a local governmental unit, the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, or the United States Army Corps of Engineers. The applicant will be so advised. 2. Alterations must be designed and conducted in a manner that ensures only the smallest amount of bare ground is exposed for the shortest time possible. Mulches or similar materials must be used, where necessary, for temporary bare soil coverage, and a permanent vegetation cover must be established as soon as possible; 3. Methods to minimize soil erosion and to trap sediments before they reach any surface water feature must be used. Altered areas must be stabilized to acceptable erosion control standards consistent with the field office technical guides of the Anoka County Soil and Water Conservation District and the United States Soil Conservation Service; 4. Pill or excavated material must not be placed in a manner that creates an unstable slope_ Plans to place fill or excavated material on steep slopes must be reviewed by qualified professionals for continued slope stability and must not create finished sloped of 30 percent or greater; 5. Any alterations below the ordinary high water level of the waterbodics described in 1002.05, Subd. 1B must first be authorized by the Commissioner under Minnesota Statutes, Section 1030.245; 6. Alterations of topography must only be allowed if they are necessary to allow a defined permitted accessory or conditional use within the underlying zoning district and do not adversely affect adjacent or nearby properties; and 7. Placement of natural rock riprap, including associated grading of the shoreline and placement of a filter blanket, is permitted if the finished slope does not exceed three feet horizontal to one foot vertical, the landward extent of the nprap is within ten feet of the ordinary high water level, and the height of the riprap above the ordinary high water level does not exceed three feet. E. Connections to public waters. Excavations where the intended purpose is connection to a public water, such as boat slips, canals, lagoons, and harbors, must be controlled by local shoreland controls. Permission for excavations may be given only after the Commissioner has approved the proposed connection to public waters. Subd. 3. Placement And Design of Roads, Driveways, and Parking Areas. Page 20 A. Public and private roads and parking areas must be designed to take advantage of natural vegetation and topography to achieve maximum screening from view from public waters. Documentation must be provided by a qualified individual that all roads and parking areas are designed and constructed to minimize and control erosion to public waters consistent with the Lino Lakes Local Water Management Plan. B. Roads, driveways, and parking areas must meet structure setbacks and must not be placed within shore impact zones when other reasonable and feasible placement alternatives exist. If no alternatives exist, they may be placed within these areas, and must be designed to minimize adverse impacts. C. Public and private watercraft access ramps, approach roads, and access - related parking areas may be placed within shore impact zones provided the vegetative screening and erosion control conditions of this subpart are met. For private facilities, the grading and filling provisions of 1102.09, Subd 2 of this ordinance must be met. Subd. 4. Stonnwater Management. A. Impervious surface coverage of lots must not exceed the impervious surface percentage of lot area outlined in Section 1102.07 C4 of this ordinance_ B. When possible, existing natural drainageways, wetlands and vegetated soil surfaces must be used to convey, store, filter, and retain stormwater runoff before discharge to public waters. C. Development must be planned and conducted in a manner that will minimize the extent of disturbed areas, runoff velocities, erosion potential, and reduce and delay runoff volumes. Disturbed areas must be stabilized and protected as soon as possible and facilities or methods used to retain sediment on the site. D. When development density, topographic features, and soil and vegetation conditions are not sufficient to adequately handle stormwater runoff using natural features and vegetation, various types of constructed facilities such as diversions, settling basins.. skimming devices, dikes, waterways, and ponds may be used. Preference must be given to designs using surface drainage, vegetation, and infiltration rather than buried pipes and man- made materials and facilities. Residential, commercial and industrial subdivisions and site plans shall provide for the collection and treatment of storm water in compliance with the City Storm Water Management Plan if determined that the site improvements will result in increased runoff directly entering a public water. All grading and drainage plans shall require review and approval by the City Engineer and the Rice Creek Watershed District_ E. When constructed facilities are used for stormwater management, documentation must be, provided by a qualified individual that they are designed and installed consistent with the Lino Lakes Local Water Management Plan. F. Newly constructed stormwater outfalls to public waters must provide for filtering or settling of suspended solids and skimming of surface debris before discharge_ 1102.10 Special Provisions for Commercial, Industrial, Public /Semipublic, Agricultural, Page 21 Forestry and Extractive Uses and Mining of Metallic Minerals and Peat. Subdivision 1. Standards for Commercial, Industrial, Public and Semipublic Uses. Surface water - oriented commercial uses and industrial, public, or semipublic uses with similar needs to have access to and use of public waters may be located on parcels or lots with frontage on public waters. Those uses with water - oriented needs must meet the following standards: A. in addition to meeting impervious coverage limits, setbacks, and other zoning standards in this ordinance, the uses must be designed to incorporate topographic and vegetative screening of parking areas and structures; B. uses that require short-term watercraft mooring for patrons must centralize these facilities and design them to avoid obstructions of navigation and to be the minimum size necessary to meet the need; and C. uses that depend on patrons arriving by watercraft may use signs and lighting to convey needed information to the public, subject to the following standards: 1. No advertising signs or supporting facilities for signs may be placed in or upon public waters. Signs conveying information or safety messages may be placed in or on public waters by a public authority or under a permit issued by the Anoka County Sheriff; 2. Signs may be placed, when necessary, within the shore impact zone if they are designed and sized to be the minimum necessary to convey needed information. They must only convey the location and name of the establishment and the general types of goods or services available. The signs must not contain other detailed information such as product brands and prices, must not be located higher than ten feet above the ground, and must not exceed 32 square feet in size. If illuminated by artificial lights, the lights must be shielded or directed to prevent illumination out across public waters; and 3. Other outside lighting may be located within the shore impact zone or over public waters if it is used primarily to illuminate potential safety hazards and is shielded or otherwise directed to prevent illumination out across public waters. This does not preclude use of navigational lights. Subd. 2. Agriculture Use Standards. A. General cultivation farming, grazing, nurseries, horticulture, truck farming, sod fuming, and wild crop harvesting are permitted uses if steep slopes and shore impact zones are maintained in permanent vegetation or operated under an approved conservation plan consistent with the Lino Lakes Local Water Management Plan, as provided by a qualified individual or agency. The shore impact zone for parcels with permitted agricultural land uses is equal to a line parallel to and 50 feet from the ordinary high water level. B. Animal feedlots must meet the following standards: Page 22 I . new feedlots must not be located in the shoreland of watercourses and must meet a minimum setback of 300 feet from the ordinary high water level of all public waters basins; and 2. modifications or expansions to existing feedlots that are located within 300 feet of the ordinary high water level are allowed if they do not further encroach into the existing ordinary high water level setback. Subd. 3. Forest Management Standards. The harvesting of timber and associated reforestation must be conducted consistent with the provisions of the Minnesota Nonpoint Source Pollution Assessment - Forestry and the provisions of Water Quality in Forest Management "Best Management Practices in Minnesota." Subd. 4. Extractive Use Standards. A. Site Development and Restoration Plan. An extractive use site development and restoration plan must be developed, approved, and followed over the course of operation of the site. The plan must address dust, noise, possible pollutant discharges, hours and duration of operation, and anticipated vegetation and topographic alterations, It must also identify actions to be taken during operation to mitigate adverse environmental impacts, particularly erosion, and must clearly explain how the site will be rehabilitated after extractive activities end. B. Setbacks for Processing Machinery. Processing machinery must be located consistent with setback standards for structures from ordinary high water levels of public waters. Suhd_ S. Mining of Metallic Minerals and Peat. Mining of metallic minerals and peat, as defined in Minnesota Statutes, section 93.44 to 93.51, shall be a permitted use provided the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, section 93.44 to 93.51 are satisfied. 1102.11 Water Supply and Sewage Treatment Subdivision 1. Water Supply. Any public or private supply of water for domestic purposes must meet or exceed standards for water quality of the Minnesota Department of Health and the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency_ Subd. 2. Sewage treatment. Any premises used for human:occupancy must be provided with an adequate method of sewage treatment as follows: A. Publicly -owned sewer systems must be used in accordance with Chapter 402 of the City Code. Any new buildings used for human habitation or human occupancy, including businesses, located on property adjacent to a sewer main, or in a block through which the system extends, shall be connected to the municipal sanitary sewer system. B. All private sewage treatment systems must meet or exceed the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency's standards for individual sewage treatment systems contained in the document titled, "Individual Sewage Treatment Systems Standards, Chapter 7080 ", a copy of which is hereby adopted by reference and declared to be a part of this ordinance. Page 23 C. On -site sewage treatment systems must beset back from the ordinary high water level' in accordance with the setbacks contained in 1102.07 of this ordinance. D. All proposed sites for individual sewage treatment systems shall be evaluated in accordance with the criteria in subitems 1-4. If the determination of a site's suitability cannot be made with publicly available, existing information, it shall then be the responsibility of the applicant to provide sufficient soil borings and percolation tests from on- site field investigations. Evaluation criteria: 1, depth to the highest known on calculated ground water table or bedrock; 2, soil conditions, properties and permeability; 3. slope; and 4. the existence of lowlands, local surface depressions, and rock outcrops. E. Nonconforming sewage treatment systems shall be regulated and upgraded in accordance with section 1102.08, Subd. 3 of this ordinance. 1102.12 Subdivision /Platting Provisions Subdivision 1. Land suitability. Each lot created through subdivision, including planned development overlays authorized under 1102.13 of this ordinance, must be suitable in its natural state for the proposed use with minimal alteration. Suitability analysis by the City Council shall consider susceptibility to flooding, existence of wetlands, soil and rock formations with severe limitations for development, severe erosion potential, steep topography, inadequate water supply OF sewage treatment capabilities, near -shore aquatic conditions unsuitable for water -based recreation, important fish and wildlife habitat, presence of significant historic sites, or any other i`cature of the natural land likely to be harmful to the health, safety, or welfare of future residents of the proposed subdivision or of the community. Subd. 2. Consistency with other controls. Subdivisions must conform to all official controls of this community. A subdivision will not be approved where a later variance from one or more standards in official controls would be needed to use the lots for their intended purpose. In areas not served by publicly owned sewer and water systems, a subdivision will not be approved unless domestic water supply is available and a sewage treatment system consistent with Sections 1102.07, Subd. 2 and 1102.11 can be provided for every lot. Each lot shall meet the minimum lot size and dimensional requirements of Section 1102.07, Subd. 1 including at least a minimum contiguous lawn area, that is free of limiting factors sufficient for the construction of two standard'soil treatment systems. Lots that would require use of holding tanks shall not be approved. 1102.13 Shoreland Planned Development Overlay Subdivision 1. Types of PDO's Permissible. Shoreland Planned Development Overlays as defined in Section 1102.03 of this Ordinance are allowed for new projects on undeveloped Page 24 land, redevelopment of previously built sites, or conversions of existing buildings and land. Subd. 2. Processing of Shoreland PDO's. Planned Development Overlays shall be processed as a conditional use permit in accordance with Section 5, Subd. 5 and. Section 6, Subd. 20 of the Lino Lakes Zoning Ordinance as well as the performance standards outlined herein. Subd. 3. Application for a PDO. The application for a PDO /CUP must submit the following documents in addition to documents required by Section 5, Subd. 5 and Section 6, Subd. 5 of the Lino Lakes Zoning Ordinance, prior to final action being taken on the application request: A. A site plan and /or plat for the project showing locations of property boundaries, surface water features, existing arid proposed structures and other facilities, land alterations, sewage treatment and water supply systems where public systems will not be provided, and topographic contours at ten (10) foot intervals or less. When a PDO is a combined commercial and residential development, the site plan and /or plat must indicate and distinguish which buildings and portions of the project are residential, commercial or a combination of the two. B. A property owners association agreement (for residential PDO's) with mandatory membership, and all in accordance with the requirements of Section 1 102.13, Subd_ 6 of this ordinance. C. Deed restrictions, covenants, permanent easements or other instruments that: I- properly address future vegetative and topographic alterations, construction of additional buildings, beaching of watercraft, and construction of commercial buildings in residential PDO's; and 2. ensure the long -term preservation and maintenance of open space in accordance with the criteria and analysis specified in Section 110 Subd. 6 of this ordinance. I). When necessary, a master planldrawing describing the,project and the floor plan for all commercial structures to be occupied. E. Those additional documents as requested by the City of Lino Lakes that are necessary to explain how the PDO will be designed and will function. Subd. 4. Site "Suitable Area" Evaluation. Suitable area for development within a shoreland planned overlay districts (PDOs) shall exclude all wetland, watercourses, land below the ordinary high water level of public waters, public street rights -of -way, and public parks. This suitable area and the proposed project are subject to PDO performance standards governing density and design. A. All PDOs must have access to public sanitary sewer and water. B. Lot area and width standards. The following lot are per unit standards shall apply to all PDOs within the Shoreland Overlay District provided that the resulting total development density in the shoreland area does not exceed the total City -wide shoreland density allowed based on State of Minnesota shoreland standards. The City, in its evaluation of any PDO, shall evaluate the proposed PDO density in light of the development capacity of the City -wide Shoreland Overlay District. Where the requirements of the underlying zoning district are more or less restrictive than those set forth herein, the more restrictive standards shall apply. I. Residential (R -3, R -4 Zoning Districts) NE RD GD T a. Lot Area: Townhomes 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 Apartments/ Condominiums 2,900 2,900 2,900 2,900 b. Lot Width: Townhomes 150 130 130 130 Apartments/ Condominiums 150 130 130 130 c. Setbacks: 1. GHWL 200 feet 2. Setback from Streets: a. Right-of-Way Line of Federal, State or County Highway 40 feet b. Local Street 30 feet 3. Side Yard Setback 20 feet 4. Setback Between Buildings on Multiple Building Site 35 feet 5. Bluff Setback 50 fe C. Maintenance and Administration Requirements. 1. Before final approval of a planned development overlay, adequate provisions must be developed for preservation and maintenance in perpetuity of open spaces and for the continued existence and functioning of the development. 2. Open Space Preservation. Deed restrictions, covenants, permanent easements, public dedication and acceptance, or other equally effective and permanent means must be provided to ensure long -term preservation and maintenance of open space. The instruments must include all of the following protections: a. Commercial uses prohibited (for residential PDO's). b. Vegetation and topographic alterations other than routine maintenance prohibited. c. Construction of additional buildings or storage of vehicles and other materials prohibited. d. Uncontrolled beaching of watercraft prohibited. 3. Development Organization and Functioning. Unless an equally effective alternative community framework is established, when applicable, all residential planned unit developments must use an owners association with the following features: a. Membership must be mandatory for each dwelling unit or site purchaser and any successive purchasers. b. Each member must pay a pro rata share of the association's expenses, and unpaid assessments can become liens on units or sites_ c. Assessments must be adjustable to accommodate changing conditions. d. The association must be responsible for insurance, taxes, and maintenance of all commonly owned property and facilities. 1). Open Space Requirements. Planned development overlays must contain open space meeting of the following criteria: 1. At least fifty (50) percent of the total project area must be preserved as open space. 2. Dwelling units or sites, road rights -of -way, or land covered by road surfaces, parking areas, or structures, except water - oriented accessory structures or facilities are developed areas and shall not be included in the computation of minimum open space. 3. Open space must include areas with physical characteristics unsuitable for development in their natural state, and areas containing significant historic sites or unplatted cemeteries. ' 4. Open space may include outdoor recreational facilities for use by owners of dwelling units or sites, by guests staying in commercial dwelling units or site, and by the general public. 5. Open space must not include commercial facilities or uses, but may contain water - oriented accessory structures or facilities. 6. The appearance of open space areas, including topography, vegetation, and allowable uses, must be preserved by use of restrictive deed covenants, permanent easements, public dedication and acceptance, or other equally effective and permanent means. 7. The shore impact zone, based on normal structure setbacks, must be included as open space. For residential PDO's, at least fifty (50) percent of the shore impact zone area of existing developments or at least seventy (70) percent of the shore impacts zone area of new developments must be preserved in its natural or existing state. For commercial PDO's, at least fifty (50) percent of the shore impact zone must be preserved in its natural state. E. Erosion Control and Stormwater Management. Erosion control and stormwater management plans must be. developed and the PDO must: I. Be designed, and the construction managed, to minimize the likelihood of serious erosion occurring either during or after construction. This must be accomplished by limiting the amount and length of time or bare ground exposure. Temporary ground covers, sediment entrapment facilities, vegetated buffer strips, or other appropriate techniques must be used to minimize erosion impacts on surface water features. Erosion control plans must be in accordance with the Lino Lakes Local Water Management Plan and approved by the City Council, 2. Be designed and constructed to effectively manage reasonably expected quantities and qualities of stormwater runoff. Impervious surface coverage must not exceed thirty -five (3 percent with an approved stormwater management plan and consistency with Section 1102.09. F. Centralization and Design of Facilities. Centralization and design of facilities and structures must be done according to the following standards: 1. planned development overlays must be connected to publicly owned water supply and sewer systems. 2. Dwelling units or sites must be clustered into one or more groups and located on suitable areas of the development. They must be designed and located to meet or exceed the following dimensional standards for the relevant shoreland classification, setback from the ordinary high water level, elevation above the surface water features, and maximurn height. 3. Shore recreation facilities, including but not limited to swimming areas, docks, and watercraft mooring areas and launching ramps, must be centralized and located in areas suitable for them. Said shared lake access must be approved by the City Council. Evaluation of suitability must include consideration of land slope, water depth, vegetation, soils, depth to groundwater and bedrock, or other relevant factors. The number of spaces provided for continuous beaching, mooring, or docking of watercraft must not exceed one (1) for each allowable dwelling unit or site in the first tier (notwithstanding existing mooring sites in an existing commercially used harbor). Launching ramp facilities including a small dock for loading and unloading equipment, may be provided for use by occupants of dwelling units or sites located in other tiers. 4. Structures, parking areas, and other facilities must be treated to reduce visibility as viewed form public waters and adjacent shorelands by vegetation, topography, increased setbacks, color, or other means acceptable to the City Council, assuming summer, leaf -on conditions. Vegetative and topographic screening must r be preserved, if existing, or may be required to be provided. 5. Accessory structures and facilities, except water - oriented accessory structures, must meet the required principal structural setbacks and must be centralized. 6. Water- oriented accessory structures and facilities may be allowed if they meet or exceed design standards contained in Section 1102.07, Subd. 2 of this ordinance and are centralized. Subd. 7. Conversions. The City of Lino Lakes may allow existing resorts or other land uses and facilities to be converted to residential planned unit developments if all of the following standards are met: A. Proposed conversions must be initially evaluated using the same procedures for residential planned development overlays involving all new construction. Inconsistencies between existing features of the development and these standards must be identified_ B. Deficiencies involving water supply and sewage treatment, structure color, impervious coverage, open space, and shore recreation facilities must be corrected as part of the conversion or as specified in the conditional use permit. C. Shore impact zone deficiencies must be evaluated and reasonable improvements made as part of the conversion. These improvements must include, where applicable, the following- 1 . Removal of extraneous buildings, docks, or other facilities that no longer need to be located in shore impact zones. 2. Remedial measures to correct erosion sites and improve vegetative cover and screening of buildings and other facilities as viewed from the water. 3. If existing dwelling units are located in shore impacts zones, conditions shall be attached to approvals of conversions that preclude: exterior expansions in any dimension or substantial alterations. The conditions must also provide for future relocation of dwelling units, where feasible, to other locations, meeting all setback and elevation requirement's when they are rebuilt or replaced. D. Existing dwelling unit or dwelling site densities that exceed standards in Section 1102. 13, Subd. 5 may be allowed to continue but must not be allowed to be increased, either at the time of conversion or in the future. Efforts must be made during the conversion to limit impacts of high densities by requiring seasonal use, improving vegetative screening, centralizing shore recreation facilities, installing new sewage treatment systems, or other means. Effective Date. This ordinance will take effect and be in force after its passage and official publication. Page 29 1 Centerville x Elementary School Crossing of CSAH 14 (Main Street) �X F.< E; +: L in the ` z City of Centerville ` Anoka Count t� Y r � 0 m ?; Prepared for: Anoka County Highway Department 1440 Bunker Lakes Blvd Andover, Minnesota 55304 August 7, 1998 WSB Project No. 1044.08 SCHOOL CROSSING STUDY CENTERVILLE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ON CSAH 14 (MAIN STREET) IN THE CITY OF CENTERVILLE C.P. 98 -07 -14 WSB PROJECT NO. 1044.08 for Anoka County Highway Department August 7, 1998 WSB & Associates 350 Westwood Lake Office 8441 Wayzata Boulevard Minneapolis, MN 55426 Table of Contents I. Introduction ................... ............................... I II. Background Data ................ ..............................2 IIl. Crossing Alternatives ........... ............................... 3 IV. Alternative Analysis ............ ............................... 4 V. Conclusions / Recommendation ... ............................... 6 Appendix Attached Figure I Location Map Figure 2 Roadway Configuration Figure 3 Traffic V lumes Figure 4 Crossing Alternatives F: \W P W IN\] 044.Wtw.wpd I - INTRODUCTION The Anoka County Highway Department, in response to concerns raised by the Centerville School District (IDS 12) and the City of Centerville, initiated a study of the school crossing on CSAH 14 (Main Street) at Progress Road. WSB & Associates was retained by Anoka County to conduct the school crossing study in order to determine the proper location and traffic control of this crossing. The existing school crossing is located in the City of Centerville on CSAH 14 (Main Street), approximately one block east of the intersection of CSAH 14 and CSAH 21 (Centerville Road). Figure 1, in the appendix, illustrates the project location. Currently, the area adjacent to the school crossing includes the school and residential uses on the north side of CSAH 14 and residential uses and some commercial uses south of CSAH 14. The purpose of this study was to review and analyze school crossing alternatives for CSAH 14 (Main Street). The analysis will recommend the proper traffic control, including signing and striping as well as the location of the crossing. The methodology, results and conclusions /recommendations of these analyses are contained in the following sections of this report. School Crossing Study Anoka County WSB Project No. 1044.08 Page 1 II - BACKGROUND DATA Roadwav Characteristics CSAH 14 (Main Street) is an cast/west "A" Minor Arterial (connector /expander) traveling through the City of Centerville. Primarily, this roadway, through the City of Centerville, is a two lane facility (one lane in each direction) with paved shoulders. Adjacent to the elementary school, a sidewalk exists on the north side of the roadway. A 30mph speed limit is posted through the area adjacent to the elementary school. Approaching the intersection of Progress Road, from the east (westbound), a slight upgrade exists. A striped pedestrian crosswalk is provided across CSAH 14 (Main Street) on the east side of Progress Road. Currently, pedestrian crossing signs exist approaching the intersection from both direction. A figure illustrating the existing roadway configuration, signing and striping is included as Figure 2 in the Appendix. Currently, the CSAH 14 corridor has substantial "Visual Interference ". The narrow right -of -way together with several buildings /obstructions immediately adjacent to the right -of -way, contribute to this interference. A slight upgrade exists on CSAH 14 approaching the school from the west. The Anoka County Highway Department conducted a review of the existing traffic control devices on CSAH 14 (Main Street). Several recommendations for improvements were identified on or adjacent to the roadway, including, sign locations and obstructions to sight lines. A copy of the County study is included in the Appendix. Existing_ Traffic Volumes Traffic volume data was obtained from the Anoka County Traffic Volume Map for 1996 traffic conditions. The average daily traffic (ADT) in 1996 on CSAH 14 (Main Street), in the area of the elementary school, was 7,759 vehicles. Based on an hourly traffic count at the intersection of CSAH 14 and CR 54, the peak hours on Main Street are 5:00 -6:00 PM and 7:00 -8:00 AM with the peak school times of 3:00 -4:00 PM and 8:00 -9:00 AM. Existing Pedestrian Volumes The Anoka County Highway Department conducted a pedestrian/gap -time study at the existing school crossing on CSAH 14 at Progress Road, on December 17, 1997. The study found there was an adequate number of gaps on CSAH 14 for pedestrians crossing this roadway. Based on the School Crossing Study, no additional controls were warranted at the crossings. A copy of the County's study is included in the Appendix. School Crossing Study Anoka County WSB Project No. 1044.08 Page 2 III- SCHOOL CROSSING ALTERNATIVES Although additional controls at the crossings are not warranted at this time, the City of Centerville and IDS 12 have requested a Joint Powers Agreement with the County of Anoka to install some type of flashing beacon system at the crossing. Three basic school crossing alternatives were reviewed for the CSAH 14 (Main Street) crossing at the Centerville Elementary School. The alternatives are as follows: 1. Flashing Beacon System Two types of flashing beacon systems can be utilized for the intersection. a. Advanced Pedestal Flashers b. Overhead Flasher at Crossing In both cases several construction alternatives would exist for providing power to these flashing beacon systems. The construction alternatives could use a combination of underground trenching and/or the existing wood poles currently located adjacent to the roadway. 2. Signing / Striping Improvements This improvement would involve upgrading the advanced signing and crossing signing as well as the other waming/regulatory signs adjacent to the intersection. It also would provide for improved crosswalk striping. 3. Crossing Relocation This alternative evaluated the potential relocation of the school crossing to a safer location for pedestrians. School Crossing Study Anoka County WSB Project No. 1044.08 Page 3 IV - CROSSING ALTERNATIVE ANALYSIS Each alternative outlined in the previous section was analyzed and is discussed below. 1. Flashing Beacon System Flashing beacon systems are installed to help identify hazardous locations and conditions or draw attention to warning or regulatory signs. Flashing beacons are warranted based on four reasons. a. Limited Visibility If the site distance of an intersection is limited based on obstructions or curvature of the roadway, this warrant would apply. A 30mph approach would require a visibility of approximately 200 feet. Approximately 400 feet of site distance is available for westbound traffic, therefore, this intersection does not meet site distance requirements. b. Accident Rate A flashing beacon may be warranted if high safety improvement criteria are met or there have been 4 or more left turn accidents, right angle accidents, or accidents of a type being preventable in a period of one year. This intersection does not meet the accident rate requirements. C. School Crossing A flashing beacon may be warranted if school crossing is desigrrated across any of the approaches of the intersection and there are more than 500 vehicles per hour crossing the crosswalk during heavy pedestrian usage periods and there are insufficient usable gaps for pedestrians using the crosswalk. Based on the analysis conducted by Anoka County Highway Department there are sufficient gaps for pedestrians crossing CSAH 14, therefore, this warrant is not met. d. Rural Trunk Highway Junctions If both roadways are rural trunk highways, a flashing beacon maybe required. This does not apply to this project. Based on the pedestrian and traffic volume data, this intersection would not justify a flashing beacon system. However, if state aid dollars are not used and it is determined that a flashing beacon should be installed, further analysis should be conducted of the location of the flashing beacons. School Crossing Study Anoka County WSB Project No. 1044.08 Page 4 Flashing beacons include beacons mounted on span wire directly over the intersection or beacons mounted on pedestals above the advanced warning signs, Both flashing beacon systems have advantages and disadvantages. Overhead beacons may be confused with flashing red signals or may distract the motorist from the roadway signing, but they aid the motorist in locating the intersection of hazard. Pedestal mounted beacons help draw attention to the advanced warning signs but do not help locate the intersection or a crosswalk somewhere ahead of the flashing beacon. The advanced pedestal mounted flasher can be installed at this intersection, for a cost ranging from 56,000 - 512,000. These costs are based on information provided by the Centerville School District No. 12. These alternatives would include using a variety of trenching and existing wood poles. In addition, there is no good location to locate the pedestal pole for eastbound CSAH 14. This is due to the large driveway and parking lot adjacent to the roadway on the south side of CSAH 14. Overhead mounted flashers would require a substantial amount of work at the intersection in order to mount the flashing beacon at the proper height. This is a result of the significant number of overhead power and cable t.v. lines across and in this intersection. The estimated cost to provide a overhead mounted signal would range from $7,000415,000 depending on the need for relocating existing overhead power lines. 2. Signing 1 Striping Improvements This alternative would involve re- striping the crosswalk and providing additional or improved signing of the crosswalk. Visibility of the advanced warning signs and crosswalk markings is imperative for drivers approaching eastbound and westbound on CSAH 14 (Main Street), This alternative would provide for replacing the existing pedestrian crossing signs with the strong fluorescent yellow -green signs and re- striping the crosswalk with high intensity pavement markings. This improvement would be a relatively low cost improvement. The cost for this alternative would range from 51,00042,000, assuming installation by County maintenance crews. In addition, the recommendations of the Anoka County Study of January 7, 1998 should be carried out and CSAH 14 right -of -way be cleared to the greatest extent possible to improve the visibility of the crossing. 3. Relocating Crossing This alternative would relocate the existing crosswalk from Progress Road to the intersection of CSAH 21 one block west. Currently, this intersection is a 4 -way stop sign controlled intersection. By relocating the crosswalk to this intersection, the existing stop sign control can be used for the safety of pedestrians. However, some roadway improvements may be required to accommodate the school crossings. This would include the addition of pedestrian curb ramps for the crossing as well as sidewalk installation. This alternative provides for the safest situation for pedestrian crossing CSAH 14 (Main Street). The estimated cost to provide a relocated crossing would depend on the amount of sidewalk installed. School Crossing Study Anoka County WSB Project No. 1044.08 Page 5 V - CONCL USIONS / RECOMMENDATIONS Based on the school crossing analysis outlined in the previous section, the following conclusions can be made. • Based on existing traffic volumes and pedestrian volumes, the existing crossing is functioning adequately with respect to the number of gaps provided for crossing the roadway. • The existing crossing does not justify, based on Ivin/DOT justification criteria, a flashing beacon system. • The safest condition for pedestrians would be crossing at a location where vehicles are required to stop (i.e. CSAH 14 at CSAH 21). Based on the conclusions outlined above, the following recommendations are made. 1. Alternative 2, signing/striping improvements be implemented. 2, The recommendations as outlined in the Anoka County study of January 7, 1998, be implemented with respect to sign placement, sight lines and right -of -way clearing. 3. On a long term basis, the school crossing should be relocated to the 4 -way stop sign controlled intersection at CSAH 14 and CSAH 21 (Alternative 3) to provide forthe safety of crossing pedestrians. This should be accomplished when the City is prepared to provide sidewalks in and around this area. 4. If the City / School District are unwilling to relocate the crosswalk, and still request a flashing beacon system, it is recommended that an advanced pedestal mounted flashing beacon system be installed. School Crossing Study Anoka County WSB Project No. 1044.09 Page 6 APPENDIX School Crossing Study Anoka County WSB Project No. 1044.08 Page 7 3 ST. w a o O'.'EBEC S! ST. PEl i IER LAKE, ' o J I — — — — y yar W W PRAIRIE DR. 72 /z Si. ` PROJECT LOCATION o HAYFIELD > GpRa IXAL OR. , 14 RD. w i SS 5. ROBIN LA. 21 wESTV Tow rc �SaULE'CIR. ST � MAIN Y Si. CenLervzLe Lake SO REL HERIT AGE a ST. �6 ° P 21 CENTERVILLE 0 1990 POP. 1,633 CENTER �`, ST, tER / LAM 0111 c E W V s iT G 4. ? U S l i xa SHORT Wards \,\ \ \fake J,Iy :J E. CEDAR ST V} Lake LINO LAKES � � \ P 22 1990 POP. 8,807 s a a 1N 2s e 9� ^ C PONOV]EW 4i iJIX R22W ERG AI$ CT. 1F FEa c T(MBERN'O:F� ❑R. �4�a ¢"S � t S f PHEASAN "r NL�Y'S oOR. B KEN Q OAR CT. z IB IS 15 r BIRCH ST. CNOKEC P ° . - IflO. yyE VETLf A: SUCCIH 'LA U RD. ORN VI LA. ° LAeFiEL l 35E� W 350 Wetwood Lake OfSr� SCHOOL CROSSING STUDY V6B Pra.ed NO. 1044.08 Date: July 20,1998 s V/.. 8441 Minneapof Wayrata MN 55 Boukvard 42s, 8 Centerville Elementary School Crossing of CSAH 14 (Main Street) Project Location Map d- FAX Nt -1i0] INFRASTRUCTURE - ENGINEERS - PLANNERS Centerville, Anoka County, Minnesota Figure 1 t:\ 1044.00 VO44.08 \re6ori OLOgrt 1 1 1 , 1 1 1 1 I � — - -- J �- - -- - -- - - -- -- _J L - -- - -- - -- - -- - -- - -- a CSAN 14 MAIN ST. '0 N 1 1 I p 1 1 w o o a 0 1 1 I I = 1 U — A — to _ 1 _ — 1 _ _ 1 — _ 1 — — 15 _ _ 16 F-1 1 O Q 1 W K a 1 � - 350 Nlestxood Lake Office SCHOOL CROSSING STUDY WSB Project No. 1044.06 Date: July 20, 1998 7.Vt.. 9Mlwayz8laR00ieverd Minneapolis, MN SS429 Centerville Elementary School W %� Crossing of CSAII 14 (Main Street) Roadway Configuration d Ariw.i.11i, Inc, FAAW -1700 INFRASTRUCTURE - ENGINEERS - PLANNERS Centerville, Anoka County, Minnesota Figure 2 1: \1044.00 \1044.09 \report \ t iq- 02.dgn I 7,759 ADT (1996) 526 (8 -9 am) - - -� �- - ---� L- - - - - -- 54 9( 3 -4 Pm) - --- -- - - - - -- v CSAH 14 M4IN 57. 1 1I N I}I 350 W419t4W0(1 Lake OFfica SCIIOOL CROSSING STUDY WSBPtojed No. 1044.08 DaWMY20,1998 WSB 8441 Waycata UOUICVad Min�apolis,MN 55428 Centerville Elementary School Crossing of CSAH 14 (Main Street) Traffic Volumes F(J(511.1]W INFRASTRUCTURE ENGINEERS - PLANNERS Centerville, Anoka County, Minnesota Figure 3 ti \1044.00 \Ip44.OB \repor � \ {i9- 03.d9n Alternative 3 Relocate Crossing Alternative 1D a Alternative IA J Overhead Flash L Advanced Flasher CSAIi 14 Q _ MAIN ST. I I I � I ❑ I i ce „ H cif I � Alternative lA Advanced Flasher 0 I ' I � I I � � a 11 — — 12 _ 13 — — 14 — — 15 _ _ 16 I I o 1 W I i a I � - 350 Westwood Lake Office SCHOOL CROSSING STUDY WSO Project No. 1044.00 Date: July 20,1998 S 8441 Wayzata BN rie Minepolis, MN N 554 55448 Centervi Elementary S A� at' Crossing of CSAII 14 (Main Street) Crossing Alternatives A Asswmu, 1n, FAX 541 -17M INFRASTRUCTURE - ENGINEERS - PLANNERS Centerville, Anoka County, Minnesota Figure 4 t; \IOJ4.00 \1044.08 \repor i \ f iq-04,tlgn ANOKA COUNTY HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT SCHOOL CROSSING STUDY and REVIEW OF EXISTING TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES CSAH 14 (Main St.) in the City of Centerville January 7, 1998 Scope: The scope of this study /review is to determine the need to add, change or remove any traffic control devices on CSAH 14 (Main St.) in the area of Centerville Elementary School. INDEX Page Description/Location Map 2 School Crossing/Gap Stud 3 -7 Evaluation of Existing Traffic Control Devices 8 -10 Summa /Recommendations 11 Page 7 SEGMENT DESCRIPTION/ LOCATION MAP This segment of CSAH 14 (Main St.) is a two lane, two way roadway with paved shoulders. CSAH 14 has a Functional Classification of Minor Arterial A (Connector /Expander). a F ST.FRANCIS BETA EL + ^ f 0 V BURNS U ua 2JN1t000 , GRD E •• � v . o a p.. 1 SEY /\ AN DVEP. HM U10E COLUMBUS `LJI c� F A.N p 1 f BLAINE LIND L1 C PIES �• I o CI S CSAH 7a MA }N Si. F D N , Page 2 School Crossing Study: A school crossing /gap study was conducted on December 17, 1997 at the Progress Road school crossing. This study was conducted using the procedures described in A Program For School Crossing Protection a recommended practice by the Institute of Transportation Engineers. The primary objective of this study is to determine if some additional level of control is needed at the crossing point. Additional levels of control may include crossing guards, pedestrian actuated signals, school crossing flashers or moving of the crossing point to another location. Based on the data collected additional levels of control at this crossing point would only be needed if and when the percent of pedestrian delay time reaches 76 percent. During the four Gap Study periods the percent of pedestrian delay at this crossing ranged from 28 to 51 percent. The percent of pedestrian delay and the additional control needed line are shown in the chart below. Percent of Pedestrian Delay Chart, CSAH 14 Main St. at Progress Rd. 100 100 so 90 so Additional Controls Needed at 76% Pedestrian Delay SO 70 70 60 60 s0 50 40 3D 30 1D 10 0 0 AM Gap Study 1 AM Gap Study 2 PM Gap Study 1 PM Gap Study 2 r. Percent of Delay — Control Needed Line A copy of the computerized report generated with the data collected during this study is shown on the following four pages of this report. Based on this school crossing study no additional controls are warranted at this school crossing. Page 3 SCHOOL CROSSING PEDESTRIAN GAP TIME ! PEDESTRIAN TIME DELAY STUDY SCHOOL NAME Centerville Elementary _OCATION C.S.A.H. 14 @ Progress Rd. (east side) DATE OF STUDY 12/17/97 WEATHER Clear 145 STUDY START TIME 8:00 AM STUDY ENDING TIME 9:00 AM CROSSWALK ACROSS C.S.A.H. 14 ✓JIDTH OF ROAD 40 NUMBER OF LANES 2 DIVIDED? NO ISLAND WIDTH N/A 1st GAP STUDY START TIME :` 8:00:00 ENDING TIME 8:15:00 2nd GAP STUDY START TIME 16:15:00 ENDING TIME 16:30:00 ADEQUATE GAP TIME = 14 SECONDS FIRST GAP STUDY SECOND GAP STUDY COMBINED STUDIES MINUTES 0:15:00 MINUTES 0:15:001 1 MINUTES 0:30:00 TO �L OF ADEQUATE GAPS= 486 645 1131 FIRST STUDY SECOND STUDY COMBINED STUDY TIM E'T'= 900 900 1800 time "t "= 486 645 1131 % DELAY "D" 46 28.33333 37.16667 ACCEPTABLE PERCENT OF DELAY 76 461 28.33333 37.1666667 highlight the shaded cells above and open chart (new) Page 4 SCHOOL CROSSING PEDESTRIAN GROUP SIZE STUDY SCHOOL NAME Centerville Elementary:" LOCATION C.S.A.H. 14 @ Progress Rd. (east side) DATE OF STUDY 12/17/97 WEATHER Clear/ 45 STUDY START TIME T 8:0 M STUDY ENDING TIME 9:00 AM CROSSWALK ACROSS 'C. S.A.H. 14 WIDTH OF ROAD 40 NUMBER OF LANES 2 DIVIDED? E ISLAND WIDTH N/A ARRIVAL GROUP SIZE GROUP SIZE # OF ROWS OF GROUPS 10 46-50 10 9 41 -45 9 8 36 -40 8 7 31-35 7 6 26-30 6 5 21-25 5 4 16 -20 4 3 11 -15 3 2 6 -10 1 2j 7T 10 1 5- 1 5 1 " -'5 TOTAL NUMBER OF GROUPS SPECIAL FIELD NOTES GROUPSTIMES.15 0.9 NUMBER OF ROWS "N" 1 ADEQUATE GAP "G" 14 Page 5 SCHOOL CROSSING PEDESTRIAN GAP TIME / PEDESTRIAN TIME DELAY STUDY SCHOOL NAME Centerville Elementary LOCATION C.S.A H. 14 @ Progress Rd. (east side) DATE OF STUDY 12/17/97 WEATHER Clear 145 STUDY START TIME 3:30 PM STUDY ENDING TIME 4:30 PM CROSSWALK ACROSS C,S,A.H. 14 WIDTH OF ROAD 40 NUMBER OF LANES 2 DIVIDED? NO ISLAND WIDTH N/A 1st GAP STUDY START TIME 15:15:00 ENDING TIME 15:30:00 2nd GAP STUDY START TIME 16:15:00 ENDING TIME 16:30:00 ADEQUATE GAP TIME= 14 SECONDS FIRST GAP STUDY SECOND GAP STUDY COMBINED STUDIES MINUTES 0:15:00 1 MINUTES 0:15:00 MINUTES 0:30:00 TOiALOFADEQUATE GAPS= 460 442 902 FIRST STUDY SECOND STUDY COMBINED STUDY TIME'7= 900 900 1800 time "t "= 460 442 902 % DELAY "D" 48.8888889 50.88889 49.88889 ACCEPTABLE PERCENT OF DELAY 76 48.88889 50.88889 49.8888889 highlight the shaded cells above and open chart (new) Page 6 SCHOOL CROSSING PEDESTRIAN GROUP SIZE STUDY SCHOOL NAME Centerville Elementary LOCATION C.S.A -H. 14 @ Progress Rd. (east side) DATE OF STUDY 12117/97 WEATHER Clear/45 STUDY START TIME 3:30 PM STUDY ENDING TIME 4:30 PM CROSSWALK ACROSS C.S.A H. 14 WIDTH OF ROAD 40 NUMBER OF LANES 2 DIVIDED? NO ISLAND WIDTH NIA ARRIVAL GROUP SIZE GROUP SIZE V OF ROWS it OF GROUPS 101 46-50 10 91 41 -45 9 8 35 -40 8 7 31-35 7 6 26 -30 6 5 21 -25 5 4 16 -20 4 3 11 -15 3 2 6 -10 1 2 1 10 1 5- 1 5 1 S TOTAL NUMBER OF GROUPS SPECIAL FIELD NOTES GROUPS TIMES .15 0.9 NUMBER OF ROWS ADEQUATE GAP "G" 14 Page 7 R Review of Existing Traffic Control Devices A field review of all signs and markings along CSAH 14 (Main St.) from the west junction with CSAH 21 (Centerville Rd.) to the east junction with CSAH 21 (20th Ave.) was conducted. Sign locations, sign conditions and all pavement markings are shown on the drawing on page 10 of this report. Also shown on this drawing are several trees and commercial type signs within Anoka County Right of Way. Several items identified during this review were found not to be consistent with the manuals, policies, guidelines and/or operational practices used by this department. Each of these items and a recommended course of action are listed in Table I on page 9 of this report. I Page 8 Table I I' PROBLEM RECO MMENDED COURSE OF ACTION reral school related signs have been Replace the following signs with new, High Intensity identified as having Engineering Grade Grade signs: Scotchlite sheeting that is in either fair or poor a) Eastbound advance school symbol. condition. b) Eastbound and westbound school crossing symbol and down arrow. Inconsistent use of School Xing Ahead Remove the School Xing Ahead supplemental plate supplemental plate with advance School sign. from the eastbound advance school sign. Sign spacing is less that desirable, especially 1) Remove both the eastbound and westbound in the area from CSAH 21 (Centerville Rd.) to "School Walking Route" warning signs. These Mill Rd. signs are not consistent with the MMUTCD or standard signing used in other school areas. (See Section 7A -1 Need for Standards of the MMUTCD) 2) Look for an alternative location for the eastbound Adopt -A- Highway sign, if another location can be found notify group and move sign. Inconsistent spacing of some advance Relocate the following signs or sign assemblies: warning signs and junction assemblies. 1) The eastbound Stop Ahead sign on CSAH 14 at CSAH 21 (20th Ave.). Reset at the distance given for condition A in Table II -1 in Section 2C of the MMUTCD. 2) The eastbound JCT 54 assembly. Reset this assembly at a new location approximately 400 ft. west of CSAH 21 (20th Ave.) Several commercial signs appear to be Contact the owners of these signs and order them located within Anoka County Right of Way. removed from the Right of Way. Allow 48 hours for compliance. If not removed within 48 hour time period have them removed by ACHD sign or maintenance crews. Several trees appear to be located in or have ACHD Maintenance Division to be directed to branches extending into Anoka County Right remove any trees and /or branches within Anoka of Way. These trees and /or branches either County Right of Way on CSAH 14 between the west obstruct the view of a traffic control device or and east junctions with CSAH 21. are located within a Case I Intersection Sight Distance Triangle. A wood privacy fence and at least two pine ACHD to notify homeowner to remove fence and trees are located within Anoka County Right trees from Right of Way. (ACHD has some history Vay at 1873 Main St. on the trees. ACHD advised the homeowner not to put them in the Right of Way on 10/1/92.) Page 9 RI�I .I Llrii NT 3�p.i $6VO. YY4 RU IzInlq? :zll 91 n n A x' f1 I BTU' pt YLL R0. oc+_cc IS.x =, 20 ! , A zJ.w nosro IQI m un r m _ 5 anI \ � w m [4 n a cr z ❑ C 7 WW IT.. R II -9 � I j - area i l [YF� I I vJ6 A nJn ruurb 11. � 53r9x+a0 Sl3at !md 6 -rD�x 0 -Iln LMd -J i O S 3-: .z-CaO I � d -p I I 5]�OnvaB Tialy m-13 i mlll� SKI o N _ 1i ' � Y- 21 YI_6 I "✓b IJtLL P 1 l FNG -fd ExG -W I � 'I crltiv]ntLLllMN�n � y (' � pwE 1REE2 d RM /I I { I Svb nK. G -rx 1 U S]rgw nxin� �� i I I I I 1 -2a I Dn It I, � N r y l C O nti "i - ➢' wwi .,,imary and Recommendations The School Crossing /Gap Study indicates that adequate gaps in the traffic stream exist and that the percent of pedestrian delay time is at an acceptable level. No additional controls are recommended. The review and evaluation of existing traffic control devices has revealed several items not consistent with the manuals, policies, guidelines or operational practices used by this department. It is recommended that the courses of action listed in Table I of this report are carried out. The city or school district could consider the installation of school crossing flashers. However, because the warrants for additional controls at the crossing are not satisfied at this time, the construction and ongoing maintenance costs of these flashers would be the responsibility of the city and /or school district. Page 11 SENT BY: 5- 8 -98 : 9 =32111 : CENTENN:MAL ISD X12- 612 862 4201:# 21 5 jhum t'vP1' (.'UWAN!tz �c; u�. U� 3o I :�� ice:. 1 :3ui lvv, r, I Egan -tic ay Electrical COntfadarS ay 4, 1998 Mr. Mike Hughes Transportation Manager Centennial School District Re_ Flashing beacon System Elementary School Dear Mike, The following is list of different prices that can be used in maldng your decision as to which type of flashing beacon system you would like to have installed at the location by tha school in Cerrterville. . The first posslblllty Is to use a standard MnDot deslgn pedestal bases and do averything underground, The cost to do things this way would be 511,950.00. The majority of the cost is from the use of trenching as well as pushing under the streets, This process would also require us to cut and patch the paridng lot of the establishment on the Southwest side of the street The second possibility would also be to use standard MnDot pedestals, but instead of going underground the entire way (between pedestals) we would usa the overhead wirers (assuming that we could get permisglan from N.S.P_). The cost of this application would be $8,485.00. The last possible way of doing what your looking for Is by using the existing utility poles to mount the flashers as well ns to string the poww lines to operate the system overhead on the N.S.P. Imes, once again this could only work wtth N.S.P. approval. The cost to do the task this way would be $5,825.00. f have enclosed a couple of drawings to hopefully help to explain the three different posslbiilties. If you have any question or need more information let me know. Sincerely, ELAN -McKAY ELECTRICAL CONTRACTORS, INC. Tony Juetiner Project Manager, Outside Division c:om vr<:el. Indu+crial Y. 7100 )4., icinc Take {(/11e(( ,� �uiAner £Lntriu] Mina6apalls,'XJl L-oota 0042 7 c d-%r ee 7.1 (814) 944.1171 Fni (6] Y 1 591 -6560 An Fgoal Op puriunicy' Employer /COnvutvr. SENT BY: S- 8 -98 9:32AM : CENTENNIAL ISD 912- 612 862 4201: 3/ 3 f1;U& f,I�A.N UUI&AN1ES J nJ v - , * �b r. SSVT BY: -5- 8 -98 9:32AN : CENTISWAL ISD "12— 612 862 4201:: 4/ 5 pi {rJ} ,UAN 'U,N FAN Ito {LUCIUD. U0 `1C• 1-3—:Q :b1.1�.�71 :Y� - 3M."U u:o c, J f 2'1 S' 50 r , ELAN LUN,YhNIES v �1U ",'U ;i.UJ ;I5 I, I qi 1 \V „75UU y.Z UUU Y. Iz a 0