HomeMy WebLinkAbout1996-08-14 - CC Packet CENTERVILLE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA — AUGUST 14, 1996
5:00 P.M. WORKSH P
6:00 P.M. REGULAR MEETING
7July AL OF MIN UTES
, 1996
PA ENT OF CLAIMS
1.,,6entennial Fire District
4Z City of Centerville
SET AGENDA
PETITIONS AND COMPLAINTS
APPEARANCES
�1/ / Rockey Goertz, Willow Glen sketch plan
UNFINISHED BUSINESS
�roject Updates
a. ater Extension
Clearwater Meadows
eagle Pass
I/2. T ash Grates for Culverts���
II Road Stop Signs
Financial Summary Publication
, ; so NEW SINESS
F.Ordinance one of Hensel Property
Fence Variance
44A
f f infrared Thermal Bond Patches
Genevieve's Beer Permit Request
CO M" " """""" MMIITTEE REPORTS
AA ISTRATOR REP TS Ceti
614- ONSENT AGENDA
ADJOURN
�3
_ CITY OF CENTERVILLE
CITY COUNCIL
JULY 24, 1996
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, the City Council of the City of Centerville held
their regular meeting on July 24, 1996, at the City Hall, Mayor Wilharber called the
meeting to order at 6:00 p.m.
PRESENT: Tom Wilharber MaryJo Helmbrecht
Theresa Brenner Laura Powers- Rasmussen
ABSENT: Sanna Buckbee
STAFF /CONSULTANTS: Jim March Trudi Breuninger
Dave Nyberg
PUBLIC HEARING — Street & Utility Improvement Hearing for Clearwater Meadows
Wilharber stated the public hearing is for the purpose of correcting a technical defect of
not putting the estimated costs of the improvements in the previous hearing notice. The
first public hearing was held March 27, 1996. The estimated costs of the improvements is
$462,000.
MOTION by Helmbrecht, second by Brenner to close the public hearing for street and
utility improvements for Clearwater Meadows. Motion carried unanimously, Powers -
Rasmussen not present.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
MOTION by Brenner, second by Helmbrecht to approve the meeting minutes of June 19,
1996, with one correction to page 2, 6th paragraph. Motion carried unanimously,
Powers - Rasmussen not present.
MOTION by Brenner, second by Helmbrecht to approve the meeting minutes of June 26,
1996, with the correction of adding first names on the introduction of minutes. Motion
carried unanimously, Powers- Rasmussen not present.
MOTION by Helmbrecht, second by Brenner to approve the meeting minutes of July 10,
1996. Motion carried unanimously, Powers - Rasmussen not present.
PAYMENT OF CLAIMS
•
CC7 -24MM. WPS 1
7 • City Council Minutes from July 24, 1996
MOTION by Brenner, second by Helmbrecht to approve the Centennial Fire District's
expenditures dated July 18, 1996. Motion carried unanimously, Powers - Rasmussen not
present.
MOTION by Helmbrecht, second by Brenner to approve the City of Centerville's receipts
and disbursements dated July 11 -24, 1996, Motion carried unanimously, Powers -
Rasmussen not present.
(Powers - Rasmussen arrived at 6:08 p.m.)
MOTION by Brenner, second by Helmbrecht to approve Pay Estimate 42 for Main Street
/ Progress Road / Elementary School Watermain Extension Project. Motion carried,
Powers - Rasmussen abstained.
SET AGENDA
Add to new business: Cable Commission, 1997 Proposed Police Budget, and Traffic
Survey.
MOTION by Wilharber, second by Helmbrecht to set the agenda for July 24, 1996, with
i nk the above noted additions. Motion carried unanimously.
_MW PETITIONS AND COMPLAINTS
Helmbrecht had residents ask about the noise ordinance and how it relates to enforcing of
cars with loud stereos. Staff will look into it.
Powers - Rasmussen expressed a safety concern regarding a culvert from Acorn Creek to
the creek. This culvert is large enough that children can walk in and also live animals.
She would like to see a grate put on it. Nyberg stated the purpose for not putting a grate
on is because it collects debris. He added that the culvert is large enough that children
cannot get stuck in it. An estimated cost for a grate is $800 -1000. Staff is to research the
pros and cons to a grate, get a cost estimate, and come back to council with a
recommendation.
APPEARANCE - Carolyn Drude, Ehlers and Associates, Ina
Ms. Drude distributed the bid tabulation for the general obligation bond for the watermain
extension project. Ms. Drude commented that she was pleased with the bids and that they
all were relatively close.
Powers - Rasmussen asked what the savings would have been if bonded with Clearwater
Meadows project. Ms. Drude responded; $3,000 - 4,000.
CC7 -24MM. WPS 2
City Council Minutes from July 24, 1996
_J
Helmbrecht asked about the assessment rate. Ms. Drude stated the bond payment and
term does not take assessment payments into consideration, it is determined by existing
debts.
Ms, Drude explained the resolution regarding awarding the sale of the bond and she
mentioned that it does have a call feature at the year 2004.
MOTION by Helmbrecht, second by Brenner to pass Resolution 96 -27, a resolution
awarding the sale of $410,000 general obligation water revenue bonds to Juran and
Moody, Inc., St. Paul, Minnesota. Motion carried unanimously.
APPEARANCE – Mary Capra: Centerville Wall of Fame
Ms. Capra explained that the concept for lifetime achievement awards originated with the
Economic Development Committee. It was felt that citizens who had dedicated years of
their lives to community service and involvement should be honored. This award would
be presented to present and past residents of the community who have spent a great deal
of their lives dedicated to community service through, city government or committees,
involvement in fire department, schools, charity work, etc.
The nomination of this award would be Ieft to the residents. It was suggested that the
l— award be presented during the Fete des Lacs festival. This person would receive a
certificate of lifetime achievement. It was hoped that photos and stories would be kept on
display in the council chambers of those who have received the award.
Ms. Capra stated that funding could come from donations for the historical society given
in the past and future donation would also be used to fund the project.
Ms. Capra provided the council with a copy of a historical society survey that was done
on the public works building.
The council thanked Ms. Capra and stated that it would be on a future agenda for the
council to discuss.
Acorn Creek Pay Estimate #8 for Class 5 Work
MOTION by Helmbrecht, second by Brenner to approve the partial pay estimate number 8
for the Acorn Creek project in the amount of $2,102 as per MSA's letter dated July 22,
1996. Motion carried unanimously.
Eagle Pass
Helmbrecht requested the ordinance for PUD's be checked regarding the developer being
responsible for development of the park within the project.
CC7 -24MM. WPS 3
City Council Minutes from July 24, 1996
Powers- Rasmussen explained that because of her absence she had questions regarding the
feasibility study and wetlands in the park. She also expressed frustration with the decrease
in the open space and that is not turning out to be what was originally proposed.
Nyberg stated that the schedule will slip some because the city has not received the
required escrow amount. (The schedule is noted in MSA's letter dated July 12, 1996.)
Nyberg said because the developer is funding the project, versus going through the 429
process, the street and utilities do not have to be bid. C. W. Houle is the contractor
generally used by the developer.
Nyberg suggested that a good way to keep some control over the project would be
approving the pay estimates.
General consensus of the council is that no action or staff time is to be spent on the project
until the escrow is received.
Clearwater Meadows
Nyberg stated the final submittal has been drafted and routed internally at Dewberry and
1 Davis and the main issues have been communicated with FEMA. There appears to be no
problems with the FEMA application.
Nyberg stated the utility bid could be awarded at the August 14 meeting and if it would go
to August 28 the contractor has said they will extend the bid.
Appraisal Proposals
Helmbrecht stated it would be to the city's benefit to use an appraiser that works with
Anoka County Court system.
March stated it may be premature to have appraisals done before an issue has been
formally presented to the city. Brenner said that the appraisals were requested to assist in
setting the assessments. Nyberg thought it would set a standard that may not be in the
best interest of the city.
MOTION by Helmbrecht, second by Brenner to request that staff research what other
cities are charging for water assessments and their procedure and to hold off on the
appraisals. Motion carried, Powers - Rasmussen voted nay.
Antenna Permit Fee
MOTION by Helmbrecht, second by Powers - Rasmussen to approve the antenna permit
application fee of $1250.00 and that resolution 96 -05 -- fee structure -- be amended to
include this fee. Motion carried unanimously.
CC7 -24MM. WPS 4
City Council Minutes from July 24, 1996
Cable Commission
MOTION by Powers- Rasmussen, second by Brenner to approve the Commission's Joint
Powers Agreement voting structure as amended as per the letter dated May 21, 1996,
from the North Central Suburban Cable Communications Commission. Motion carried
unanimously.
1997 Proposed Police Budget
As per the Police Chiefs memo dated July 17, 1996, the 1997 proposed budget reflects an
increase of 3.75% over the previous year.
Last year Centerville budgeted $169,889 towards police services. The 1997 proposed
budget shows at $176,340, this is a $6,451 increase.
Helmbrecht stated that Centerville only has one main event a year and would like police
service for the event instead of the Lions Club paying for service.
Wilharber said that it is not a big increase considering the union contract for the officers is
up for renewal and that there was a cutback in state funding.
MOTION by Wilharber, second by Helmbrecht to approve the proposed 1997 police
budget as presented in the Chiefs memo dated July 17, 1996. Motion carried
unanimously.
Traffic Study
According to the Police Chiefs memo dated July 15, 1996, the particular intersection of
Mill Road, Hayfield Road and Clear Ridge does not meet the warrant for an all way stop.
An be suggested checking with the city engineer on a single stop sign placement for the
intersection of Sorel Street and Progress Road.
Powers - Rasmussen suggested speed bumps with pedestrian signs or other options that
may be more effective.
The Public Works Director is to research the cost of speed bumps, what type of
maintenance would be necessary and come back to the council with a recommendation.
ADMINISTRATOR REPORTS
March provided a memo that updated the following:
CC7 -24MM. WPS 5
City Council Minutes from July 24, 1996
Senior Housing: Mr. Yantos will be presenting the resolution recently passed by council
to the full HRA board on July 23, 1996. Mr. Yantos will keep the city informed on the
progress of the project.
I/I Grant Application: On July 23, 1996, the city received notice that the grant
application was approved in the amount of $1700. This will be used to study the I/I
problem in the downtown area of the sanitary sewer system.
Local Government Aid: The Department of Revenue reported the LGA contribution is
approximately $7,000 higher than projected by the League of MN Cities.
City Budget: Workshop set up for 5:00 p.m. on August 14, 1996.
COMMITTEE REPORTS
Brenner suggested having a "volunteer day" to install the city sign. She also reported the
sign would be in the parade during Fete des Lacs.
Powers- Rasmussen stated that complaints were still coming in regarding the garbage
service. March stated that Randy Hagerty is setting up a meeting with United Waste to
discuss these complaints.
Wilharber commended March for his involvement and hard work in his position. The
council agreed that he is a "keeper ". Wilharber also thanked Breuninger for her service,
especially during the period of time when the city did not have an administrator.
ADJOURN
MOTION by Helmbrecht, second by Powers - Rasmussen to adjourn the regular city
council meeting at 8:20 p.m. Motion carried unanimously.
Respectfully submitted,
Trudi Breuninger
City Clerk
CC7 -24MM. WPS 6
DATE: August 1, 1996
T0: City Council
City of Circle Pines
City Council
City of Centerville
City Council
City of Lino Lakes
FROM: Milo Bennett
SUBJECT: Ratification of expenditures
and approval for payment of
ANEL August expenses.
Your approval of August expenses as listed on the
attached copy of the check register, checks
#8242 - 8272 and #11326 - 11328, in the amount of
$ 22,943.77 is hereby requested.
MB /al
cc: 7 Circle Pines City Council
7 Centerville City Council
7 Lino Lakes City Council
2 File
'INDERS line up top of check with these numbers. entry will appear on corresponding line. DESCRIPTION A
' r 771 (:; CHECK
DATE CHECK ISSUED TO CHECK / AMOUNT
,: "..._,. NUMBER Y v
l b i rC e p in eS u r i i PS t
' M inre,Qc — D S�ldS 0- h li -�i�PS �°
1 rol 5305 gw'A�n �� 123
3 I
} 11� pok (%evrble 52lo ve ir marn� w6e L .5-5 11
r ci (, E- br °c 046r g Dq(. c 5 cc
t NAcnal -rive. - ?rt)�chcn R.rc. 5355 �mmo4v SCrticPS DQ �9 a
! �� nne i Tec ti C� F e 53`Ib o 3z� qe
I �1to a4p 1 s any
f 4j mi r1 7iCrO - T , A, kc ice p ie° nq x b1 b
! 'I(( j to 1 i u-be 311 s_.
1. I n 6nle fol c
fik USwFS 57 , 91
� O < 1v z 0
VNA
1 W(o Ll/ ire �Y �c Way I ( "ac), 53 0 PdiC�l ppr,�s 9)5L �r5
1 c1� �:< �� 0536 E4uibraent ��l -�55
V C IV i ��`' P: 5 Ie�Dhov� Jx
-mP v_. � ce - J _!�C 530 y uihh�en ��Cal _ ICi --5
! o h EC 53V 00 bl ri
! c {T ► 53 Tele one
I:fr Rcss It;t1u <,�r�FS ,1 r�r . 53 �'amn�urti +�rviccs tau 1 <,�
1 Clio 65 I 52-1 &hor rn&,, 7-�nQ
! Clln P b (� l ce rGd Lto
_5 5 v. ( ce !PS B Z 42q
�. t,� _ 7 /O- l2,jg7 7C2o 7O3CJ _
�C I ' T1 ; 1 i n� .� -1 r c, L' P i4iZ . o -
- - � L'n L 1 'GL - 7
r �.. � �� ��4 L •. ,- . +-- .,,,,, tl._ ((�D� ��Pr<<��o._���r� FLT ` 1 l //
OUNTANT CLIENT - PACE
TOT
>TE PREVIOPS PAGE ^ ��
)BMITTED 1 1 TO ATE 1
P � , � MD. DAY YR. TOTALS
Sa '"1uar l J -� TO DATE
a.v shrew w
MSO�LL. µ.iO3 •FiLL6tNkµYO4µµ ACCOUNT
FORM NO. AJPD -35 -EDP- I NUMBERS
ERS � Line up top of check with these numbers. entry will appear on cortesponown9 "re r DESCRIPTION A
CHECK
4TE w CHECK ISSUED TO CHECK / AMOUNT TN
NUMBER Y WK
, 1L � r_ a.,, �2lUd)jF<d L wIt! -PR Z�ua kL l �lC �/ 7
! ,�� << �;,,�r
�y Z Zl3 Z
I
f
t
L 2
T f Z I
� I
"2 � ' 7
I
I
I
I
I
UNTANT CLIENT I I � FF I PAGE A
TOTALS
1 PRENGUS PAGE
MITTED I TE ►
MO. DAY YR. TOTALS
Safeguard
TO DATE ►
uxwu NO. JPD,35 -EDP ACCOUNT
FORM NO. AJPD35 -EDP -1 NuM8ER5 �
1
PLANNING AND ZONING MEETING HELD AUGUST 6, 1996
IYdllow Glen
Mr. Goertz presented a sketch plan for Willow Glen (this is the area referred to in the past
as Golden Meadows). Willow Glen is proposed to be 84 townhome units, for sale and
priced at $90- 120,000,
It would be a continued South Robin Lane as a public street with private streets to the
units. The association would take care of the private roads.
Drilling questioned the emergency vehicle access -- what it would look like / be
constructed of and whether it would work for the Hensel property.
Mr. Nyberg stated he thought it needs to be plowed in the winter but the Fire Marshal
would have to make that determination.
Mr. March asked if it would be phased to insure that the units would be sold.
Mr. Goertz stated the project is meant for starter homes and would be built eight at a time
(3 phases). The project would be a PUD and if any changes occur it would require a
i public hearing.
Drilling stated the residents concern in the past was for rental and didn't seem to have a
problem if the units would be owned.
Welk questioned the number of units per acre, Mr. Goertz stated approximately 7.
Mr. Nyberg stated that other public entities (police and school) do their own studies for
future growth and needs.
Welk expressed a concern for the number of units for the space.
Vermeulen asked if the property has been considered for Senior Housing? Mr. Goertz
stated he wouldn't have a problem with senior housing but that the land owners have it
priced for high density. The commercial zoned property to the south is a plus for the city
and the industrial is not necessarily bad. It helps being in close proximity to the freeway.
Mr. Goertz stated he wasn't sure on a time frame, would like to get going on the plans to
build in the spring.
Drilling stated it look good and suggested the Mr. Goertz take it to the City Council.
TYPICl4L BUILDINCsS
Sketch Plan NORTH
WILLOW GLEN
- S 89°50 W
658.86 7 .
Sava'._ ` P
4 UNIT TOWNHOUSE
NORTH ROBIN 1 - 4 \ \ 4 / I
T I _LANE
/
o f I I I r 1 \ \ `
II I ° Emir, e ,Y vehlle \ / /
` 1 oo'
Acce b
z I
vote Drive C\ I .46 1 111 ! I 1 II I I I C
SL ap 9LJ
8 UNIT TOWNHOUSE I _ WS
III Pt e ° �1 j
�i/ zo.ov 3
— u O
CARDINAL r III OK , s ,� 1 y -- -LANE o
Ii Q / �y j n
DRIVE 5 g 1\ Ir i i 1 11 1 1 1 1
GRAPHIC SCALE - I!I /�/ 1•, T \ \ N ' -
\ \
4 \ m
iry -�o x
41.6& r
1 \ lu oo I 45.a'Y
I he eby CMity thoi this whey. Ptmr /
.cPM ors P .d by me o w der
\� / / ' ` I / / •—_ —�\
mY dvecf suPe Ws and that t onr I q' 1 1
o d:ly RMisfered Land Surveyor under I o e
the lows of the State o, Yinnescto.
Ronald P. Alwin 3
Pa e: Li.e .4c. 17765 SOUT RO s \ \\ \ I
- LANE
G. QUO 4 SONS, INC. I I � Berm � / � � � \\\� 6 / I
Land
9180 LEXINGTON AVENUE NE. 1 Bann / i _ .. 1 . _ ..tam•.. Berm !
CflZCLE PINES, M. 55014 -3625 I ._.._. _ .— .._.._....._. — ----
Tel. 986 -5556 Fax 986 -6009 1 658.31 JOB NO. 96195F�P
5 8950 5:' W
CITY OF CENTERVILLE
RESOLUTION % -23
RESOLUTION ORDERING IMPROVEMENT PROJECT AND AWARDING BID for
CLEARWATER MEADOWS
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Centerville, Minnesota as follows:
Section 1. Background findings
1.01 Pursuant to Council resolution a public hearing on the Improvement of watermain
extension to existing home on Brian Drive south of Main Street and street and utility
improvement of an extension of Brian Drive and construction of a new street known as
Cottonwood Court was set for March 27, 1996.
1.01 Pursuant to proper notice duly given as required by law, the Council has met, conducted
the hearing and afforded an opportunity to all persons choosing to he heard.
Section 2. Project Ordered
2.01 The Improvements as proposed by the Engineer are ordered to be constructed.
2.02 The plans and specifications for the Improvements as prepared by the City Engineer are
re- approved.
2.03 It is the judgment of the City Council that the Improvements have no relationship to the
municipal comprehensive plan.
2.04 The Council declares its official intent to reimburse the costs of the Improvements, now
estimated to be $452,525.36, from the proceeds of tax exempt bonds to be issued by the city.
Section 3. Awarding Bid
3.01 Pursuant to an advertisement for bids for the Improvement, bids were received, opened
and tabulated according to law. And it appears that Lametti & Sons, Inc., Minnesota is the
lowest responsible bidder.
101 It is authorized and directed that the city enter into a contract with Lametti & Sons, Inc.
for the improvement of the development known as Clearwater Meadows according to the plans
and specifications therefor approved by the city council and on file in the office of the city clerk.
Adopted by the city council this 14th day of August, 1996
Am ATTEST: Tom Wilharber, Mayor
Trudi Breuninger, City Clerk
Lo:�> Z
July 30, 1996
To: City Council
From Paul Palzer PWD/BI
Re: Trash Grates for Culverts
++++++++++++++++++ +++++++++++++++ ++++ +++ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +++++ +++
As requested from the last Council meeting, I have done research into trash grates for the
culverts on Brian Drive and Old Mill Road. These grates are primarily designed to collect
debris in the drainage way and prevent it from entering the rivers and lakes. The grates
also aid in preventing children from entering the storm pipe.
The grates require more maintenance to keep the openings clear of debris especially
during the spring and fall months. In larger storm pipes the grates would also reduce the
possibility of a smaller child from falling from the top onto the bottom of the pipe.
The cost to install grates on Brian Drive would be $5,000.00 and Old Mill Road would be
$7,000.00. These are ballpark figures utilizing city forces installing the grates. Please let
me know if follow -up action is required on this issue.
3
July 30, 1996
To: City Council
From: Paul Palzer PWDB
Re: NO Road Stop Signs
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ + +++ + + + + +++ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + ++
From the information presented and discussed during the last Council meeting, I gather
that residents on the collector routes in town don't particularly like the increase traffic
flow down their streets. For years these routes experienced traffic flow more
characteristic of residential lateral instead of a collector road. This problem will increase
in the future until the residents get use to the increased traffic flow.
Instead of installing stop signs or speed bumps along these routes the Council may want to
look into the option of reducing the speed limit along these routes or city wide to 25 mph
on the residential streets.
T,CAL Bu,")INGB sketch Plan NORTH
WILLOW GLEN
5 89°50'57" W
, mar ` i i Y ii g i i i 658.86' —
r
— l
i
� 1 /
`// I
o \ \\ * 'C�' a'z 4 UNIT TOWNHOUSE NORTH ROBIN 4 LANE .I I 'r" { l 9 4 f
ar l I I II "Emer ly veh:le
\ I
s Acce d
j Z<� , \ / \�
\ \ C
— �- - -� I
2 i 'G zo.W' �/ l
I�I
S LQe LJ1=1 -1_ I I I II I I t
1 �� 46
Mw'?
6 UNIT TOWNHOUSE
1 I I 11 I 1 I I
I
P`e
I
I'.
CARDINAL 6
DRIVE
5
- GRAPHIC SCALE - I. // / , o, 4 \ \ m
I \
s I
4UW \ aM 1
I he- y certify that this carry. pla0
w report ors prepwed by me w undo ( \ I
my o duty mtt a La-d Sunre,or urW I 0 \ `\ ..�,.� I � p 0e• ) \ \ /
the Ions o/ Me State of Yinnexto.
Resold F. Alein
Date: License 4a. J776,
SOUT RO _ _ / ✓ \, \, \ \ 6
- -- i �' 7
LANE - — � �� \, 1
1 �
E: a. muc 4 SONS, INC. Berm 6 / I
Land
VSt LEXINGTON AVENUE NE. I 1 4az• Berm / i — — � - -. — 'Berm
CIRCLE i�INES, M.
Tel. '166 -5556 Fax '186 -60m1 / 658.31' JOB NO. 96195Pp
S 89°50'57" w
to yiffe 1880 Main S treet • Center MN 55038
EStab ishZd 185 (612) 429.3232 • Fax (612) 429 -8629
DATE: _JUu 2Z, 1
PLEASE DELIVER THIS INFORMATION T0:
FROM: I V ((X
NUMBER OF PAGES P TO FOLLOW:
COMMENTS: 2oi Xd 6M a al Paae C AD
Q-- 'el Pot — ft) ou i-A-h �1
1 1
(9�t�it�� .
THANK YOU' �� 3 z 7
1
u_e> 4
INVOICE NO.
Nos • b p
WGE f/ CYST ACC{NQ NSf
4779 BLOOM AVENUE • WHITE BEAR LANE MINNESOTA S5116-
512429 -77B
A FWANCE CHARGE OF % VFlLL BE COMPUTED PEF
MONTH � % PER ANNUM) ON ALL UNPAID BALANCE:
OF 30 DAYS, 2% NET 100E INVOICE DATE
AMOUNT
ENCLOSEDS
DETACH & RETURN TOP PORTION WITH REINTTANCE FOR PROPER CREDIT
CAE REF NO RAVE f OWATM OESCRIVRL'N AMOUNT
i .fix-. 1� 3coz.4�o
1 I
NO TA14t8LE A MO1ftfT A,`(ABlEAWO StLES U:( TSAAt OU E
3 io Z_to
PaERX PLASEC(ISE
�:ESS PUBUCATONS
A »MEwfless . Post -W Fax Note 7677 Owe �, Z � +(d �v135'S. IdN 551 f(}rF.t ---
cwDvL _A2
Pba(e 4 COX Phone 0
raxt �z9- �3tQz9 Fax
CITY OF CENTERVILLE, MINNESOTA
COMBINED BALANCE SHEET
ALL FUND TYPES AND ACCOUNT GROUPS
DECEMBER 31, 1995
Governmental Fund Tunes
Special Debt
General Revenue Service
ASSETS
Cash and temporary investments (deficit) $279 073 $(35 062) $ 582 829
Receivables
Taxes 14 952 - -
Accounts and accrued interest 6 280 4 241 -
Special assessments 47 470 - 533 806
Due from other governmental units 20 898 13 046 -
Prepaid items - - 62 130
Inventory 7 - _
Property, plant and equipment - net - -
Amount available in debt service funds - -
Amount to be provided for debt retirement - -
TOTAL ASSETS $368 673 17 775) 51 178 765
LIABILITIES AND FUND EQUITY (DEFICIT)
LIABILITIES
Accounts and contracts payable $ 9 320 $ 348 $ -
Accrued salaries 2 586 - -
Deferred revenue 56 229 - 530 654
Lease purchase payable - -
Bonds payable - -
TOTAL LIABILITIES - 68 135 348 530 654
FUND EQUITY (DEFICIT)
Contributed capital - - -
Investment in general fixed assets - - _
Retained earnings - unreserved -
Fund balance
Reserved - - 803 689
Unreserved 300 538 (18 123 (155 578
TOTAL FUND EQUITY (DEFICIT) 300 538 (18 123 648 111
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND FUND EQUITY
(DEFICIT) 368 673 17 775) $1 178 765
-
See Notes to Financial Statements.
_2_
proprietary Fiduciary Account Groups Totals
Fund Fund Type General General (Memorandum Only)
capital Type _ Expendable Fixed Long -term
projects Enterprise Trust Assets Debt 1995 1994
$584 816 $ 947 304 $ 3 200 $ - $ - $2 362 160 $2 320 959
612 - - - - 15 564 15 093
8 878 41 313 8 943 - - 69 655 54 881
104 919 26 579 - - - 712 774 846 868
- 33 944 288 443
8 162 - - - 70 292 66 994
1 698 - - 1 698 2 019
912 155 - 887 422 - 1 799 577 1 609 260
- 648 111 648 111 973 414
1 603 858 1 603 858 1 768 251
699 2251 937 211 1 2 143 887 422 j2 251 969 57 317 633 ^ 38 146 182
$ 9 879 $ 3 729 $ - $ - $ $ 23 276 $ 93 438
186 - - - 2 772 3 765
104 919 26 491 - - 718 293 856 097
411 969 411 969 456 665
1 840 000 1 840 000 2 285 000
114 798 30 406 - - 2 251 969 2 996 310 3 694 965
- 911 160 - - - 911 160 918 260
887 422 - 887 422 873 825
- - 995 645 - - - 995 645 894 001
- 803 689 973 414
584 427 - 12 143 - 723 407 791 717
584 427 1 906 805 12 143 887 422 - 4 321 323 4 451 217
699 225 S1 937 211 12 143 887 422 S2 251 969 $7 317 633 SS 146 182
_3
CITY OF CENTERVILLE, MINNESOTA
COMBINED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
ALL PROPRIETARY FUND TYPES
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1995
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES Enterprise
Operating income $ 77 897
Adjustments to reconcile operating income
to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation 23 280
(Increase) decrease in assets:
Accounts receivable (3 120)
Inventory - 321 [
Prepaid items (223) li
Deferred special assessments (1 488)
Increase (decrease) in liabilities:
Accounts payable 1 853
Accrued salaries )
Deferred revenue Z (80 (80 r
NET CASH PROVIDED BY OPERATING ACTIVITIES 99 865
CASH FLOWS FROM NONCAPITAL FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Operating transfer out (11 000
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Interest on investments 27 647
INCREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS 116 512
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, JANUARY 1 830 792
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, DECEMBER 31 947 304
See Notes to Financial Statements.
-8-
CITY OF CENTERVILLE, MINNESOTA
COMBINED STATEMENT OF REVENUE, EXPENSES AND CHANGES IN RETAINED EARNINGS
ALL PROPRIETARY FUND TYPES
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1995
Enterprise
OPERATING REVENUE
Charges for services $158 725
Hook -up fees and unit charges 99 690
TOTAL OPERATING REVENUE 258 415
_ OPERATING EXPENSES
Personal services 13 510
Supplies and maintenance 5 552
Other services and charges 16 495
Inspection and permit fees - 1 453
Utilities 4 863
MWCC- disposal charges 115 365
Depreciation 23 280
TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSES 180 518
OPERATING INCOME 77 897
NONOPERATING REVENUE
Interest on investments 27 647
NET INCOME BEFORE OPERATING TRANSFERS 105 544
OPERATING TRANSFERS OUT (11 000
NET INCOME 94 544
CREDIT FOR DEPRECIATION ON CONTRIBUTED ASSETS 7 100
INCREASE IN RETAINED EARNINGS 101 644
RETAINED EARNINGS, JANUARY 1 894 001
RETAINED EARNINGS, DECEMBER 31 5995 645
See Notes to Financial Statements.
-7
CITY OF CENTERVILLE, MINNESOTA
STATEMENT OF REVENUE, EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE -
BUDGET AND ACTUAL
GENERAL FUND
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1995
Variance -
Favorable
Budget Actual (Unfavorable)
REVENUE
General property taxes $328 280 $ 330 371 $ 2 091
Licenses and permits 50 400 70 532 20 132
Intergovernmental 142 818 216 717 73 899
Charges for services 5 000 4 734 (266)
Fines and forfeits 35 000 21 459 (13 541)
Miscellaneous
Interest on investments 2 000 16 256 14 256
Other 11 200 25 990 14 790
TOTAL REVENUE 574 698 686 059 111 361
EXPENDITURES
General government 176 875 194 353 (17 478)
Public safety
Police 160 424 163 285 (2 861)
Fire 55 246 94 991 (39 745)
Other 15 500 17 564 (2 064)
Streets 138 453 112 996 25 457
Parks and other 22 500 27 227 (4 727
TOTAL EXPENDITURES 568 998 610 416 (41 418
EXCESS OF REVENUE (EXPENDITURES) 5 700 75 643 69 943
OTHER FINANCING SOURCES (USES)
Operating transfer in 14 300 14 300
Operating transfers out (20 000 (100 000 (80 000
TOTAL OTHER FINANCING SOURCES (USES) (5 700 (85 700 (80 000
EXCESS OF REVENUE OVER (UNDER) EXPENDITURES
AND OTHER FINANCING SOURCES (USES) $ - (10 057) !10 057
FUND 'BALANCE, JANUARY 1 310 595
FUND BALANCE, DECEMBER 31 300 538
See Notes to Financial Statements.
-6- [
Fiduciary
Types Fund Tyne_ Totals
capital Expendable (Memorandum Only)
Projects Trust 1995 1994
$137 399 $ - $ 527 468 $ 525 001
400 - 70 932 63 358
6 495 - 223 212 571 099
200 - 4 934 13 489
- - 21 459 30 127
13 868 - 52 021 45 311
41 616 7 200 447 743 410 908
199 976 7 200 1 347 769 1 659 293
- - 194 353 172 271
- - 163 285 152 645
- - 94 991 91 827
- - 17 564 27 793
- - 112 996 105 840
- - 21 969 31 725
263 849 4 000 361 211 882 162
630 435 908 407
263 849 4 000 1 596 804 2 37 670
(63 871 3 200 (249 035 (713 377
- - 114 300 791 630
(3 300 (103 300 (705 575
i
(3 300 11 000 86 055
(67 171) 3 200 (238 035) (627 322)
578 733 8 943 1 765 131 2 392 453
72 865
584 427 $ 12 143 $1 527 096 $1 765 131
' -5
CITY OF CENTERVILLE, MINNESOTA
COMBINED STATEMENT OF REVENUE, EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE
ALL GOVERNMENTAL AND EXPENDABLE TRUST FUNDS
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1995
Governmental Fund
Special Debt
REVENUE General Revenue Service
General property taxes $ 330 371 $ _- $ 59 698
Licenses and permits 70 532 - _
Intergovernmental 216 717
Charges for services 4 734
Fines and forfeits 21 459 - -
Miscellaneous
Interest on investments 16 256 71 21 826
special assessments and other 25.990 16 749 356 188
TOTAL REVENUE 686 059 16 820 437 712
EXPENDITURES
General government 194 353 - -
Public safety
Police 163 285 - -
Fire 94 991 - -
Other 17 564 - -
Streets 112 996 - -
Parks and recreation 21 969 - _
Capital projects and other 5 258 20 935 67 169
Debt service - - 630 435
TOTAL EXPENDITURES 610 416 20 935 697 604
EXCESS OF REVENUE (EXPENDITURES) 75 643 _ (4 115 (259 892
OTHER FINANCING SOURCES (USES)
Operating transfer in 14 300 - 100 000
Operating transfers out (100 000
TOTAL OTHER FINANCING SOURCES (USES) (85 700 100 000
EXCESS OF REVENUE AND OTHER FINANCING
SOURCES OVER (UNDER) EXPENDITURES AND
OTHER USES (10 057) (4 115) (159 892)
FUND BALANCE, JANUARY 1 310 595 (14 008) 880 868
FUND EQUITY TRANSFER IN (OUT) - - (72 865
FUND BALANCE, DECEMBER 31 300 538 18 123) 648 111
o f
I
See Notes to Financial Statements.
i
-4-
I V�'
PLANNING AND ZONING MEETING HELD AUGUST 6, 1996
PUBLIC HEARING — Rezoning of the Hensel Property
Rockey Goertz stated he re -did the sketch plan to address the concerns that were
expressed at the last public hearing. The proposal of rezoning has changed in that the
request is for R2 instead of R2A. A portion of the property is already zoned correctly for
the project. Mr. Goertz stated having Main Street as an exit should alleviate some of the
traffic concerns.
Dave Nyberg stated that without doing a traffic study the flow of traffic would be hard to
determine. The exit to Main Street is a good alternative, he agreed. Mr. Nyberg added
that Centerville Road should be a collector street.
Don Simonson, 7263 Centerville Road, said that this proposal was an inlet to the traffic
problems not an outlet. Mr. Simonson went on to say he would like to reiterate John
Buck-bee's comments from the last public hearing regarding bigger lots.
Mr. Simonson also questioned why 60 foot wide streets and is this in the best interest of
the city to run a street by a school. Mr. Nyberg stated there needs to be a collector street
to the south from those homes in the northern area. And this collector is in the long range
transportation plan to have Centerville Road go through.
Mr. Nyberg commented that roads have to go by schools, Westview goes in front of it.
Mr. Simonson stated the traffic concern is the increase of traffic that would go by the
school.
Tim Schweppe, 7249 Centerville Road, said the sketch plan is an improvement from the
last but does question the reason for Centerville Road being extended. It devalues the
properties and is creating traffic problems. Need to do what is best for the city, Mr.
Schweppe commented.
Mr. Nyberg stated the city has limits for the length of cul -de -sacs and for fire protection
there needs to be more than one connection. Mr. Nyberg stated the Fire Marshal needs to
comment whether that would be acceptable.
Drilling suggested eliminating the connection to the north and leaving the rest basically the
same. And questioned whether there is a way to appease the public.
Mr. Nyberg stated that if the zoning is approved the developer would have to prepare a
preliminary plat.
Mr. Nyberg stated he provided three options for water service and also mentioned the
sewer at Centerville Road is shallow and may have to look at alternate routes for a portion
of the plat. Mr. Goertz agreed and stated he would probably look at getting the water
from the east.
Margaret Hensel asked about the concern about children walking to school. It was
mentioned that the children are now being picked up by the bus.
Drilling stated a portion of the proposed 60 foot road could be used for a trailway system.
Mrs. Hensel questioned why everybody hates them. Drilling stated they are trying to help
and that they have every right to develop their property.
Bob Knabe, 6483 - 20th Avenue South, owns the property next to Hensel's and he
expressed a concern for storm water runoff. Mr. Knabe stated that a culvert was put in
lower than Peltier Lake across Peltier Lake Drive and the detention pond is growing
because the weirs are not maintained and the culvert is to low, Mr. Goertz stated that
mitigation would be done for adding the road plus retention ponding on the east and south
ends would probably be necessary.
MOTION by Vermeulen, second by Drilling to close the public hearing on the rezoning of
the Hensel property at 7:35 p.m. Motion carried unanimously.
Recommendation from public hearing
Mr. Goertz stated the city really needs to look at the comp plan and future roads.
MOTION by Drilling, second by Vermeulen to approve the rezone of the Hensel property
from R3 to R2 (Single Family Residential) contingent upon preliminary plat approval.
P &Z also requests that the developer look at spreading out the lots on the north side to
eliminate the extension of Centerville Road, provide a fixture access to the south; and that
P &R look at a trailway system for access to the school and playground facilities. Motion
carried unanimously.
�i
z
�� 61
ag
Lr
p rn
4.1 ® 6 al V
08 °b a
0
P
C
August 5, 1996
File: 260 083 -11
i
COISILT15C ESCItiEW Mr. Jim March, Administrator
City of Centerville
1326 Energy Park Drive 1880 Main Street
St. Paul, MN 55108 Centerville, MN 55038
612 6AA -4389
1- 800 - 8882923 RE: HENSEL PROPERTY - SKETCH PLAN REVIEW
Pax: 612 - 644 -94d6
Dear Mr. March:
On July 25, 1996, we received a copy of the sketch plan for the development proposed
on the Hensel Property in Centerville. We have researched several issues regarding
development of this parcel and have summarized below some of the important issues the
City may wish to consider. Because of the preliminary nature of the sketch plan, please
understand the costs listed below would be further considered and evaluated more closely
at the time of completion of a feasibility study.
C W eNG NE !NG 'TRAFFIC ISSUES
;NV!RC%iENTAL
;naN,C'AL Two key traffic issues include increasing volume on connecting residential streets and also
7UNNNG the approach onto Main Street (CSAH 14). At the July 9th Planning and Zoning meeting,
sC�D WASTE several residents expressed concern about increased traffic volumes from the proposed
AacC"JRAL development. At that meeting, the Developer presented a sketch showing a lot and street
_c.VEeNG layout with no access to Main Street. The present sketch plan shows an access to Main
:ac =;C Street; however, a connection is also made to Centerville Road. Traffic moving from the
ruNrC.unC.N proposed development to I -35E would likely continue to utilize Peltier Lake Drive and
Mill Road as collector streets to Main Street.
The proposed approach to Main Street is in the vicinity of the existing driveway access.
This approach would meet traffic standards provided adequate site distance was available
in both directions at the intersection. Clearing trees and brush may be necessary at this
approach to provide for proper site distance.
WATER ISSUES
We have reviewed the proposed development to determine different potential watermain
connecting points into the existing water supply system. There are three options for
extending watermain to the development. All the options below include only the cost to
extend watermain to the plat, not to serve the individual lots within the plat.
Option 1 includes extending watermain across Clearwater Creek from Clear Ridge to the
OFFICES IN east cul -de -sac of the proposed development. The estimated construction cost for this
MINNEAPCUS extension to the plat is $18,900. An easement would need to be obtained to construct
PRfCR LAKE water from Clear Ridge to the creek.
Si. PAUL
WASE A
160 /083 -0502.aug
An Equal Opportunity Emplover
Mr. Jim March, Administrator
August 5, 1996
Page Two
Option 2 includes extending watermain north from Westview Street, west of the
elementary school. The estimated construction cost for this extension to the plat is
$24,200. Easements would need to be obtained from the Westview Street right -of -way
to the plat boundary.
Option 3 includes extending watermain along Peltier Lake Drive and Centerville Road.
The estimated construction cost for this watermain extension is $72,920. Please note that
this cost only includes extension of watermain. Street reconstruction costs were not
included in this estimate. No easements would be necessary for this work, as the
watermain would be constructed within City right -of -way.
SANITARY SEWER ISSUES
A close sewer connection for the development would be to extend the sewer south from
the existing stub at the dead -end of Centerville Road. As -built drawings of this sewer
show the sewer at a minimal depth. To provide sewer service to the development without
a lift station may require considerable fill to be transported to the site. The Developer
of the property would need to provide a grading plan for review to determine the
feasibility of utilizing this sewer co ection.
WETLAND ISSUES
The access road to Main Street is shown to be constructed through what appears to be a
wetland area. The amendments to the Wetland Conservation Act passed earlier this year
allow for certain impacts to wetlands for public road projects. However, the Corps of
Engineers continues to regulate this type of activity and may require mitigation for the
proposed street.
DEVELOPMENT COSTS
Estimated construction costs for the proposed development are outlined below:
Street $181,700
Sanitary Sewer 42,300
Watermain 58,400
Storm Sewer and Pond 15.000
Estimated Total Construction Cost $297,480
Overhead (32%) 95.194
Estimated Total Project Cost $392,674
260!083 -0502.aue
Mr. Jim March. Administrator
August 5, 1996
Page Three
These preliminary estimates, as mentioned above, would be further refined and evaluated
during preparation of a feasibility study for the development. The above estimate does
not include utility work required to connect the watermain or sanitary sewer to the
existing systems.
We hope the above information is useful to the City of Centerville for evaluating this
proposed development. Please let me know if we can be of further assistance.
Sincerely,
MSA, CONSULTING ENGINEERS
D 4A ,L 6t . AJkA
David E. Nyberg, P.E.
Project Engineer
DEN:tw
cc: Mr. Rockey Goertz, K -G Development, Inc.
260,0874)502.3ue
PLANNING AND ZONING MEETING HELD JULY 9,1996
PUBLIC HEARING — Rezoning he Hensel Pro
S o e .f Pnl' D OO
Called to order 7:15 p,m.
The Hensel property is a 15 acre parcel that is currently zoned Conservation, Single
Family Residential - Future Expansion, and Single Family Residential. W. Goertz stated
that rezoning the property is part of the purchase agreement.
The portion of the property zoned for single family residential is also already in the MUSA
boundaries.
The proposal is to rezone the property to high density single family (R2A).
The sketch plan showed extending Centerville Road to the south with cul -de -sacs to the
east and west with approximately 19 lots.
Mr. Goertz stated he would petition the city for improvements.
Gene Houle, 7124 Centerville Road, Q: Is it in the plan to purchase the LaRoux property.
If possible, Mr. Goertz responded.
Mr. Houle stated that he does not want Cent rville Road to go through, does not want the
traffic, and does not want city utilities.
John Buckbee, 7381 Peltier Circle, Q: the traffic flow. Mr. Goertz answered: Mill Road
and Peltier Lake Drive. He added that the road can't be looped to Main Street because of
the wetlands and RCWD is not allowing fill in the wetlands.
Mr. Buckbee questioned why high density. Mr. Goertz stated it is what is in the city's
comprehensive plan and it also fits with the surrounding area. Mr. Buckbee stated that
when he was on the council, they had discussed the footage requirements and did not want
to see the houses close together. Mr. Goertz stated that in order to make the frontages
larger and keep within the cities comp plan he would have to build town homes.
Linda Drilling, 7248 Centerville Road, expressed a safety concern for pedestrians and
children and also questioned if trees would be lost. Mr. Goertz stated there would be
some trees lost that fall within the roadway but would try to keep as many as possible. He
also mentioned that the Hensel's could cut down trees at any time because they are on
thew property.
Tim Schweppe, 7249 Centerville Road, stated he is not opposed to the project, need to do
what is best for the community. Mr. Schweppe does have a concern however for safety
and traffic.
a
I
Amy Ebsen, 1594 Peltier Lake Drive, expressed a concern on the impact to the whole city
with all the developments and the number of homes being built.
Steve Marcello, 1649 Peltier Lake Drive, also expressed a traffic concern. He stated the
city needs to put in better streets. Dave Nyberg responded that the street standards are
higher today.
Scott Maro, 7276 Centerville Road, stated the project won't work as proposed because
the maintenance of Peltier Lake Drive, Mill Road and Centerville Road are poor and the
storm sewers are not in the right places.
George Burr, 1693 Peltier Lake Drive, stated because the city wants the watermain to go
through doesn't mean the residents do. He also commented that emergency vehicle routes
have to be looked at.
Rich Sohan, 7251 Mill Road, commented that Mill Road can't take any more traffic.
Wayne LeBlanc, 1677 Peltier Lake Drive, said he used to sit on the RCWD advisory
committee and doesn't think it would be that big of an issue to have a road to Main Street.
Mr. Nyberg stated that if you impact wetlands you generally have to replace them at a 2 to
1 ratio. Regarding the traffic issues, Mr. Nyberg stated that it has been a long term goal
to have Centerville Road develop to the north at a 9 ton road.
Bonnie Larson, 1724 Peltier Lake Drive, experiences a lot of traffic from Waterworks --
drinking and driving and not aware of children. Ms. Larson stated that no thought has
been put into developments in Centerville and this proposal is not ideal for this property.
Tourville stated that the city will grow and doesn't feel comfortable putting up gates to
keep development out.
Norm Fritchie, 1637 Peltier Lake Drive, stated the traffic issue needs to be addressed.
Don Moe, 1740 Peltier Lake Drive, stated the locals use Peltier Lake Drive as a cut across
and also Lino Lakes residents use it to get to 35E. He also works on the fire departments
and stated it is difficult to get through because of the large volume of children in the area.
Need to look at the big picture -- what is best for Centerville as a whole.
Mr. Buckbee stated he has a 13 acre parcel that was originally platted to have 22 homes
and would like to see less density in Centerville. Would recommend not going to R2A
anywhere in Centerville and would rather see R5.
Ms. Ebsen said that traffic is one issue but what about crime with the limited police
coverage that Centerville has.
Bill LaLonde, 1687 Westview, believes it to be premature for the community and also
made the comment that nobody said anything about the schools. He stated that he would
not turn over his property and it would be a severe legal battle if Centerville Road was
ever extended.
Mr. Goertz stated he is only here with a proposal and the residents may have legitimate
concerns but ultimately it affects the Hensels. The comp plan shows townhomes.
Cynthia LaBlanc, 1677 Peltier Lake Drive, would recommend not allowing Centerville
Road to go through.
Theresa Brenner stated she has been involved in the comp plan update and the city has
held town meetings and she encourages residents to attend the public hearings. She stated
she would've like to see a moratorium on development during the updating of the comp
plan. Brenner finds it frustrating to look at developments while re -doing the comp plan.
She also advised the residents to call her or city staff if they have any questions.
Tourville stated that public input is important but very seldom do they get it until it is in
the person's backyard.
Karen Clearance, 1649 Heritage, said she doesn't know what a comp plan is to attend
meetings. She also has a concern for the wetlands and raw sewage flowing in the
downtown area.
Ron Barnes, 1594 Peltier Lake Drive, said he came to Centerville for the esthetic value of
the land and with the increasing traffic and crime it is dividing the community.
Tom Wiiharber stated that only 11 people came to the town meeting and 7 of which were
from other communities. Residents have to let the council members know how they feel.
Sandy Peterson, 1585 Peltier Lake Drive, expressed a concern for the shortage of school
space. Questioned what happens with the school with the number of homes going up and
does the developer help pay for the school. Mr. Goertz stated the developer does pay
their share by paying taxes on the lots and model homes that aren't homesteaded.
Mr. Goertz stated that he doesn't want controversy and he agreed to look at other options.
MOTION by Drilling, second by LaMotte to close the public hearing at 8:40 p.m. Motion
carried unanimously.
N�2
CITY OF CENTERVILLE
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
TO: Centerville City Council
FROM: Trudi Breuninger
DATE: August 8, 1996
SUBJECT: NELSON FENCE VARIANCE
Planning and Zoning recommended to approve the variance request from the Nelsons at
their meeting on August 6, 1996.
P &Z decided that the main concern would be for visibility and it doesn't appear to hinder
visibility to traffic on 73rd.
MOTION by Welk, second by Drilling to grant a variance allowing a 6 foot fence - as
proposed - for a corner lot at 1846 73rd Street, as long as the set backs are met, it doesn't
obstruct vision for traffic in the area and that the neighbors are also in favor of granting
the variance. Motion carried unanimously.
Attached is the request and correspondance the city has received from the Nelsons.
NELSON FENCE VARIANCE
PUBLIC HEARING -- Nelson Fence Variance Request - July 9,1996
Mari and Roger Nelson, 1846 - 73rd Street, explained that the variance is for a 6 foot
fence around their backyard. Because their lot is on a comer it is considered a side lot
they would only be allowed to put up a 4 foot fence.
The application for the variance request completed by the Nelsons explains the reasons for
a 6 foot privacy fence.
No residents present regarding this issue.
MOTION by Drilling, second by Welk to adjourn the public hearing for the Nelson Fence
variance request. Motion carried unanimously.
Nelson Fence Variance Recommendation - July 9, 1996
Welk stated the view for traffic on the street doesn't seem to be hindered by a fence.
Mr. Nyberg suggested landscaping instead of a fence.
TourvHle stated a solid wood fence is for privacy and from the street side it looks like a
stockyard.
Drilling doesn't see a reason to grant a variance. LaMotte agreed with Drilling.
Tourville questioned the need for a 6 foot, whether a 4 foot fence wouldn't be sufficient.
He also added that comer lots do present a problem.
MOTION by LaMotte, second by Drilling to table for further research. Staff is requested
to survey surrounding communities to see how they address fences on corner lots. Motion
carried unanimously.
Nelson Fence Variance -August 6, 1996
P &Z decided that the main concern would be for visibility and that it doesn't appear to
hinder visibility for traffic on 73rd.
MOTION by Welk, second by Drilling to grant a variance allowing a 6 foot fence - as
proposed - for a comer lot at 1846 - 73rd Street, as long as the set backs are met, it
doesn't obstruct vision for traffic in the area and that the neighbors are also in favor of
granting the variance. Motion carried unanimously.
CITY OF CENTERVILLE
APPLICATION FOR VARIANCE OR REZONING
VARIANCE _ x *FEE Fj 175.
REZONING - DATE PAID 1 n I a ( - tN -
STREET LOCATION OF PROPERTY: 1 '73 r d iet
LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY: L o� J - Block 1, 42orn
Creek
SIZE OF PARCEL(S) 73 ,Si-rat 9O PgA sO rrdd
�r
723'
PROPERTY OWNER: -RCAjari AfRAOr1 PHONE # 612 40'/090$
FEE OWNER: Rpa2r 4 Aar Nel5nn
ADDRESS: IH & - 73-rt 4treo,:E, 0,p4tQ4noi . AAN !i5a: ?A
APPLICANT'S INTEREST IN PROPERTY:
FEE OWNER CONTRACT PURCHASER
LEASE HOLDER OPTIO N TO PURCHASE
DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: S'to. &l Ebg chz
REASON FOR REQUEST: -9-tp- 0-tta l hcd- --
Sig ature o ap licant * Plus any additional costs
incurred for engineering,
��• legal fees, publication
or other requirements.
SigSig a�f property owner
Date
DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST:
The side of our backyard faces the street (Peterson Trail). This area of our backyard is
classified as a "front yard ". We request a waiver to the City of Centerville's ordinance
#25.11, #4 regarding fences erected in the front yard shall not exceed four feet in
height. We request a variance to erect our whole backyard fence (including the section
facing Peterson Trail and 73rd Street) to six feet in height. See Diagram on next page.
REASONS FOR REQUEST:
1. PRIVACY: We would like to use our backyard as a retreat. We plan on having a
Victorian Garden with walk ways and setting areas through out the gardens. The six
foot fence will assist in privacy as well as helping to create a quiet meditative retreat.
Our fence would be attractive from the street. It will be a stained, wood fence of
five feet, with the top foot decorated with wooden lattice. It will be well kept, as
will the lawn between the fence and the street.
2. SAFETY FOR CHILDREN IN COMMUNITY: In our Victorian we plan to have a
goldfish pond. The goldfish pond will be eighteen inches to three feet deep. With a
four foot fence, children may be able to climb over it. A six foot fence would be a
better deterrent for the children in the neighborhood.
3. OUR OWN SAFETY: On May 15, 199 , a truck speeding around the corner of
73rd Street & Peterson Trail slid several feet on the wet pavement over the curb,
over our lawn, through our corner fence post, and onto our patio (Police Report
#84861). Had we been sitting in our backyard it is possible that we could have been
injured or killed. Again, a six foot fence would be a better deterrent for any out of
control vehicles.
4. PET CONTROL: We have two Siamese cats (front paws de- clawed). We enjoy
having our pets outdoors with us. A four foot fence would not keep our pets in our
backyard. Again, a six foot fence would.
5. SECURITY: Our home is a small rambler on grade-(no basement area). People
driving by can see into our whole house. Short of keeping the curtains closed day
and night, we are exposed to the public on Peterson Trail. Again, a six foot fence
would give us the privacy we need for better security of our home and its contents.
6. NO OBSTRUCTION: The fence would not be in a location where it would obstruct
a driver's view of an intersection. As you can see by the property diagram on the
next page, the fence is no where near the intersection.
PLEASE PROCESS THIS REQUEST AS SOON AS POSSIBLE. WE ARE
PLANNING AN OPEN HOUSE IN JUNE.
NORTH
WEST ---t -- EAST
SOUTH
73RD STREET 73RD STREET
Driveway X 70 ft PETERSON
TRAIL
65 it
Corner C 45 ft PETERSON
Of House TRAIL
98 ft
Corner
Of House-] X 29 ft � Corner C� 16ft �� PETERSON
Of Fence TRAIL
58 ft
I
Corner
Of F
DIAGRAM IS NOT DRAWN TO SCALE
PKEASE COME,
UOICE YOUR OPINION- IT COUNTS!!
PUBLIC HEARING
CENTERVILLE CITY HALL
TUESDAY, JULY 9 7:00 P.M.
TRAFFIC FLOW PATTERNS
tellerLake e .
m
m
z
Ctj 14
m
j f"i
Centerville Road
•. Mill Road •.
PLEASE CONSIDER THESE QUESTIONS:
1. Can Peltier Lake Drive" and Mill Road handle increased traffic flow for this
multi -home development? Are the roads too narrow to be collector streets?
2. Will increased traffic flow on Peltier Lake Drive make it even more dangerous
for children walking to school, bike riders and others on the streets?
3. If the land south of this parcel gets developed, will there be even more traffic
and congestion on these streets? Can we handle this?
4. Who will pay for the increased wear and tear on these streets?
5. Could we request that this development not be rezoned to "High Density" (R2A)?
6. Could we propose access to the Hensel development from County Road 14,
thus eliminating these concerns?
VOICE YOUR OPINION - IT COUNTS!!
B��Iai�.JYY�lss n, JUL 'C RECD
>s46 7 &ds
aafft� " ,ssays
612 407=4906'
July 29, 1996
Dear Planning and Zoning Committee:
We have thought about the discussion at the P & Z Public Hearing and have two
comments:
1. HILL: We considered putting the four foot fence on a two foot (high) hill to raise the height of
the fence. We do not think it would accomplish our objective of keeping the neighborhood
children out, i.e., they would stand on the hill and be able to climb over the four feet.
Furthermore, it would be unattractive.
2. CHAIN LINK FENCE: A chain link fence would not afford us privacy nor would it be attractive.
That's the kind of fence that one might think of in an industrial area. With the wood fence, we
would have a decorative two feet of lattice on the top of the four feet solid. Also, we could
decorate both sides of the fence with bird houses and flower planters.
BUREAUCRACY: One of the reasons Centerville appealed to us was our assumption that
citizens would have a more neighborly relationship with the local government; where the
citizens would be more involved in their local government and the city would exercise their
ability to assess situations and regulations based on the individual situation. We
anticipated the "red tape" of a smaller city would be simplified, if not eliminated. We
applied for this variance on May 17th.
REGULATIONS: In our opinion, the regulation should be amended to allow corner lots to
have a standard six (6) foot fence as long as it does not obstruct a clear view traffic at the
intersection.
We do not think it is too much for a resident to be able to have a small degree of
privacy and security in their own backyard, whether they are located on a corner or not.
IF REQUEST IS DENIED:
1. VARIABLE HEIGHTS: We will probably erect the six foot wood fence (4' solid topped
with 2' lattice) on the West and South side of our backyard. On the East side (Peterson
Trail) we would erect the four foot solid wood fence (without the decorative lattice on
top). Why wouldn't the city approve a variance for the two feet decorative lattice?
2. SWIMMING POOL: We are considering the idea of completely changing the focus in
our backyard to a below ground swimming pool with beach chairs, etc. However, our
first choice is the "Victorian" gardens with fish ponds and water falls. If our request is
denied, we would like to know what the requirements on a fence enclosing a swimming
pool are?
3. COUNCIL MEETING: If our request for a variance is denied, may we attend the Council
Meeting to object to the P & Z's recommendation?
We have enclosed a small statement of support our neighbor's who are located on each
side of our backyard. We hope the decision of the Planning and Zoning Committee will be
to recommend that our request for a variance be approved forthwith.
Thank you for your assistance.
Mari and`Roger ?rlson
ROGER & MARI NELSON'S
NEIGHBOR'S SUPPORT
SIX FOOT FENCE VARIANCE
Our property faces Roger & Mari Nelson's backyard. By signing this
petition, I am indicating my support of the Nelson's six foot fence (four
feet solid wood topped with two feet lattice).
1. Eric & Lynette Wahl
1840 73rd Street h e c S0,415 u �e tides e
West Side of Nelson's c fb fo - / —L 4'a J .
Back Yard (fence) A bf-
2. Chris & Michelle Radermacher
1862 73rd Street 4 a A�
East Side of Nelson's �S
Back Yard (fence)
Peterson Trail Between
3. Tracy & Nancy Tobin
1847 Prairie Drive o W '
South Side of Nelson's `�� ) Vl/` u �I j
Back Yard (fence)
4. Roger ��(7 b�/ —�
d Y ) Prairie Drive v�4 7 7 C— 1 6 o(V1 So 117
South Side of Nelson's d} rte` l .
Back Yard (fence) t44 -5Yalt % 6 4 4C - t - GfA= !gam
N�3
CITY OF CENTERVILLE
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
TO: Centerville City Council
FROM: Trudi Breuninger
DATE: August 8, 1996
SUBJECT: ORDINANCE 44A
Planning and Zoning recommended to approve the following ordinance amendment at
their meeting on August 6, 1996.
ORDINANCE 44A
NOW READS:
Section 2. All buildings erected on land within the commercial and industrial zoning
districts shall be of wood frame, steel, reinforced concrete, masonry or an equivalent or
better material. No building shall have pole barn type construction nor an exterior wall
surface of sheet metal. Exterior wall surfaces of all buildings shall be face brick, glass,
stone, decorative block, architectural concrete cast in place, pre -cast concrete panel, or
architectural metal panel. Wood may be used as a trim material.
AMEND TO READ:
Section 2. All buildings erected on land within the commercial and industrial zoning
districts shall be of wood frame, steel, reinforced concrete, masonry or an equivalent or
better material. No building shall have pole barn type construction nor an exterior wall
surface of sheet metal. Exterior wall surfaces of all buildings shall be face brick, glass,
stone, decorative block, architectural concrete cast in place, pre -cast concrete panel
Wood may be used as a trim material.
BACKGROUND: They had previously discussed combining ordinance 44A to ordinance
4. In order to do that they would need to have a public hearing. Therefore the public
hearing has been delayed to gather more changes that need to be considered for ordinance
4. In the meantime, they have approve to amend ordinance 44A as noted above.
MEMO
August 5, 1996
To: City Council
From: Paul Palzer
Re: Infrared Thermal Bond Patches
Enclosed are three quotes from the Bergman Companies whom we have contracted with
to perform the crack filling in the streets. The infrared thermal bond patch heat the asphalt
till it becomes soft and then additional material is added and the area is rolled with a
pavement roller. This operation saves cutting out the old material and its disposal plus
ARL cuts down on the mess in the streets from these operations.
I request that Council approves the quotes labeled "Peltier Lake Drive" and "East of
Center St_ & Dupre Rd" to be completed this year with a dollar limit of $2,000.00.
These areas can be monitored during the course of the coming year to determine how
effective this type of repair is on these two different problem areas.
Bergman Companies, Inc.
j661 P5 U.S. Hwy. 12 West, P.O. Box 659, Eau Claire, WI 54702 -0659 Suite 114, 7D40 Lakeland Ave., N., Brooklyn Park, MN 55428 -5615
hone (715) 874 - 6070.1.800- 497 -4907 • FAX (715) 874 -6717 Phone (612) 560 -2001 • 1 -800- 497 -4907 • FAX (612) 560 -4084
_ _4WOPOSAL SUBMITTED TO PHONE DATE
City of Centerville 612- 429 -3232 7 -15 -96
STREET JOB NAME
1880 Main Street City of Centerville
CITY, STATE AND ZIP CODE JOB LOCATION
Centerville, MN 55038 Peltier Lake Drive
We R r specifications and estimates for:
Approximately 12 infrared thermal bond patches each measuring 7J' x 51' or
2J' x 10'.
Price based on the rate of $75.00 per patch. Final price based on the actual number
of patches completed.
This proposal assumes there is no pre - determined wage scale on this project.
1. We propose hereby to furnish material and labor — complete in accordance with above specifications,
for the sum of:
Nine Hundred and no vents Dollars ($ 900.00 1
Full Payment due within 30 days after completion.
2. In the event owner defaults and fails to make payment as aforesaid, interest on any unpaid balance
shall be charged at the highest legal rate commencing with the date of default.
3. All material is guaranteed to be as specified. All work to be completed in a workmanlike manner
according to standard practices. Any alteration or deviation from above specifications involving extra costs
will become an extra charge over and above the estimate. Contractor to carry fire, tornado and other necessary
insurance, including Workmen's Compensation Insurance.
Bergman Companies, Inc. by
Jack Nelson Authorized Signature
'CEPTANCE OF PR OSAL — The above prices, specifications and conditions are satisfactory and are
..ereby accepted. You are authorized to do the work as specified. Payment will be made as outlined above.
Date of Acceptance: Signature
PLEASE SIGN AND RETURN YELLOW COPY - KEEP WHITE COPY.
Bergman Companies, Inc.
AL 6615 U.S. Hwy. 12 West, P.O. Box 659, Eau Claire, WI 54702 -0659 Suite 114, 7040 Lakeland Ave., N., Brooklyn Park, MN 55428 -5615
Phone (715) 874 -6070. 1- 800 - 497 -4907 • FAX (715) 874 -6717 Phone (612) 560 -2001 • 1 -800 -497 -4907 • FAX (612) 560 -4084
PROPOSAL SUBMITTED 70 PHONE DATE
City of Centerville 612 - 429 -3232 7 -15 -96
STREET JOB NAME
1880 Main Street City of Centerville
CITY, STATE AND ZIP CODE JOB LOCATION
Centerville, MN 55038 East of Center St & Dupre Rd
We tnspecifications and estimates for:
Approximately 10 infrared thermal bond patches each measuring 71' x 5J' or
21' x 10'.
Price based on the rate of $75,00 per patch. Final price based on the actual number
of patches completed.
This proposal assumes there is no pre- determined wage scale on this project.
AML
low
1. We propose hereby to furnish material and labor — complete in accordance with above specifications,
for the sum of:
Seven Hundred Fifty and no cents Dollars I5 750.00 I
Full Payment due within 30 days after completion.
2. In the event owner defaults and fails to make payment as aforesaid, interest on any unpaid balance
shall be charged at the highest legal rate commencing with the date of default.
3. All material is guaranteed to be as specified. All work to be completed in a workmanlike manner
according to standard practices. Any alteration or deviation from above specifications involving extra costs
will become an extra charge over and above the estimate. Contractor to carry fire, tornado and other necessary
insurance, including Wor? ' ompensation Insurance.
Bergman Companies, Inc. b
ack Nelson Authorized Signature
..CCEPTANCE OF PRO — The above prices, specifications and conditions are satisfactory and are
hereby accepted. You are authorized to do the work as specified. Payment will be made as outlined above.
Date of Acceptance: Signature
PLEASE SIGN AND RETURN YELLOW COPY - KEEP WHITE COPY.
Bergman Companies, Inc. �
j, 6615 U.S. Hwy. 12 West, P.O. Box 659, Eau Claire, WI 54702.0659 Suite 114, 7040 Lakeland Ave., N., Brooklyn a N 281 fir
Phone (715) 874 -6070. 1 -800. 497 -4907 • FAX (715) 674 -6717 Phone (612) 560 -2001 •1 -800- 497 -4907 • FAX (612) 560 -4084
P ROPOSAL SUBMITTED TO PHONE DATE
City of Centerv 612- 429 -3232 7 -15 -96
STREET JOB NAME
1880 Main Str eet City of Centerville
CITY, STATE AND ZIP CODE JOB LOCATION
Centerville, MN 55038 Peltier Lake Dr, just E of Centerville RD
We W { and estimates for:
Approximately 28 infrared thermal bond patches each measuring 71' x 51' or
21' x 10'.
Price based on the rate of $70.00 per patch. Final price based on the actual number
of patches completed.
This proposal assumes there is no pre- determined wage scale on this project.
1. We propose hereby to furnish material and labor — complete in accordance with above specifications,
for the sum of:
One Thousand Nine Hundred Sixty and no cents Dollars ($ 1,960.00 )
Full Payment due within 30 days after completion.
2. In the event owner defaults and fails to make payment as aforesaid, interest on any unpaid balance
shall be charged at the highest legal rate commencing with the date of default.
3. All material is guaranteed to be as specified. All work to be completed in a workmanlike manner
according to standard practices. Any alteration or deviation from above specifications involving extra costs
will become an extra charge over and above the estimate. Contractor to carry fire, tornado and other necessary
insurance, including Workmen's Compensation Insurance,
Bergman Companies, Inc. by
Jack Nelson Authorized Signature
CCEPTANCE OF PROP SAL — The above prices, specifications and conditions are satisfactory and are
hereby accepted. You are authorized to do the work as specified. Payment will be made as outlined above.
Date of Acceptance: Signature
PLEASE SIGN AND RETURN YELLOW COPY - KEEP WHITE COPY.
Nf3S
CITY OF CENTERVILLE
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
TO: Centerville City Council
FROM: Trudi Breuninger
DATE: August 8, 1996
SUBJECT. ST. GENEVIEVE'S BEER PERMIT REQUEST
Father Walter has requested a beer permit for August 18, 1996, during their Chicken
Dinner.
Because of the time constraints, Father Walter requested that the waiting period be
waived. (In the past the permit fee has also been waived.)