The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2003-10-22 CC Packet CITY COUNCIL MEETING Wednesday, October 22, 2003 6:30 P.M. COUNCIL MEETING ./ CALL TO ORDER 1. RoD Call 1 L,P/ ~ _ APPROVAL OF AGENDA ~ V ~ APPROVAL OF COUNCIL MINUTES fJ-P/ I October 10, 2003 Council Meeting Minutes AGENDA /J~ City of Centerville October 9, 2003 t!lrongIJ October 22. 2003 CbrimI ~I Centennial Fire District Claims vu/l..,ujl c ~ EDC Recommendations (New Resident Pac~t & FaDlWinter B,~~~s 'J<.uu I'U tjfGu~1- i Speaker~ ~ +0 ~~ ~ ~~V~/~~ A WARDSIPRESENTATIONS/APPEARANCES ~ PUBLIC HEARINGS 1.<~ 1 ttY 1. Ordinanee 1#49 - Noise (Cont'd) 4.()\j~ i/~I vn. NEWBUSINESS to tllJ~ ~ _/ 'f~~. · . ~y. Sedona Homes Developers Agr~eJlt!FinJl PAt L... It V~ t,.4.. Pavement Management Study I a1tJi.l ~ T" 't/3 ~~ ~ Request for Overweight Pel"}Pi!.-:-_1Q.~7 Jlpiff9IJ.~Road ~ ~~@~~ y PurchaseofNewCopYMP~i~ICfmgWifue C?/~ JI~ 5-0. ~ Resolution #03-055 - De&Mnftosts to be Assessed, Calling for Public Hearing & Ordering Preparation of Proposed Assessments for Municipal / . . _ /' Services Within the Pheasant Marsh Phase n Development Project C~ IJ~ b("" Resolution #03-056 - Declaring Costs to be Assessed, Calling for Public I A_/' , Hearing & Ordering Preparation of Proposed Assessments for Municipal ~ U~ Services to Benefiting Properties along CenterviUe Road, Peltier Lake Drive & Within the Peltier Preserve Development Project Resolution #O3-~57 - Declaring Costs to be Assessed, Calling for Public Hearing & Ordering Preparation of Proposed Assessments for Municipal Services (Street Construction) to Be...efiting Properties along Mound Trail Resolution #03-058 - Calling for Public Hearing on Delinquent Sewer, - % . Water & Qarbase Services for Residents Associated With The 3rd & 4th I f c./I.V'1 Quarter 2002, 1 & 2nd Quarter of 2003 Billing Cycles. . ~ vi t/ vm. OLD BUSINESS -L Communications IX. ANNOUNCEMENTSIUPDATES ~ Mound Trail Reconstruction A ~~ 7016 & 7020 Brian Court (Property Line Dispute) \~/) Sedona Homes TIF Work Session (Update) M. 'iqUo.r License Renewals Z004 (Update) . ~. J Council Packet (paper/CD?) Je'iD- 2--1 "'6(1 EDC Sno Biz (paar - Update, ~. I \ D . ". YtvleA w~ ~. of~'r~ do~..~,.-f'J CLOSED - EXECUTIVE SESSION pc9-fU.e T ~ t& fO~ x. 1. Performance Review - City Administrator XI. ADJOURNMENT CITY OF CENTERVILLE CITY COUNCIL MEETING OCTOBER 8, 2003 6:30 p.rn. Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, the City of Centerville held their regularly scheduled meeting on October 8, 2003, at City Hall, 1880 Main Street. PRESENT: Mayor Terry Sweeney Council Member Lee Council Member Capra Council Member Paar Council Member Brouss ABSENT: None. STAFF: City Administrator, Ms. Moore-Sykes City Attorney, Mr. Hoeft City Engineer, Mr. Peterson I. CALL TO ORDER- Mayor Sweeney called the October 8, 2003, City Council meeting to order at 6:35 p.m. ll. SET AGENDA Mayor Sweeney added Fete des Lacs under Announcements and Updates. Council Member Capra requested that temporary signage be added under Announcements and Updates. Ms. Moore-Sykes requested that Anoka County Community Development Authority be added under Announcements and Updates. Motion by Council Member Capra., seconded by Council Member Paar to approve the al!enda as amended. . All in favor. Motion carried unanimously. ID. APPROVAL OF COUNCIL MINUTES 1. September 24. 2003 Council Meeting Minutes Mayor Sweeney requested that the Not Approved stamp be lightened on the Minutes. City ofCentervil1e October 8, 2003 Council Meeting Minutes Mayor Sweeney requested the following changes: On Page 5, indicate that Mayor Sweeney had asked for permission to paint some walls as well. On Page 6, first paragrap~ last sentence indicate that the default increase is "approximately". On Page 8, fourth paragraph, second sentence "and when the bids were agreed". On Page 9 of 14, insert "a" in front of second were. On Page 12, third paragraph from bottom replace light rail with North Star Commuter Rail. Motion by Council Member Broussard Vickers. seconded by Council Member Lee to approve the September 24. 2003 Council Meetin!! Minutes as amended. All in favor. Motion carried unanimously. IV. CONSENT AGENDA 1. The City of Centerville September 25, 2003 through October 8, 2003 Claims for Approval 2. Centennial Fire District Claims 3. Centennial Fire District Quarterly Budget Disbursement 4. Pay Estimate #6 - Park Construction $58,949.52 (pheasant Marsh, Phase I) Motion by Council Member Lee. seconded by Council Member Paar to approve Consent A!!enda Items 1 - 3 as presented. All in favor. Motion carried unanimously. Council Member Capra indicated she would like clarification on Item 4. Mr. Peterson explained the pay request was for bituminous to pave for wear on the street: Motion by Council Member Capra. seconded by Council Member Lee to approve Consent A!!enda Item 4 as presented. All in favor. Motion carried unanimously. V. AWARDSIPRESENTATIONS/APPEARANCES None. VI. PUBLIC BEARING(S) 1. Special Assessments - 21 st Avenue Street & Storm Sewer FrOt ect Mayor Sweeney opened the public hearing at 6:37 p.m. Mayor Sweeney indicated the proposed assessments to the property owners would be $14,042 which ends up being 12% oftotal cost of the project. Mr. Kozar said this was good and thanked Council for lowering the amount. He then said he could live with the $14,042. Page 2 of 14 City ofCenterville October 8, 2003 Council Meeting Minutes Council Member Paar asked if the amount can go up after this point. Mayor Sweeney indicated the contract would be awarded and this amount is set. Motion bv Council Member Broussard Vickers. seconded by Council Member Capra to close the public hearine:. All in favor. Motion carried unanimously. Mayor Sweeney closed the public hearing at 6:44 p.m. Motion by Council Member Capra. seconded by Council Member Paar to adopt the 21st Avenue assessments as outlined in the October 8. 2003 schedule. Ayes - 4. Nays -1 (Broussard Vickers). Motion carried. Mr. Peterson indicated the pre-construction meeting was scheduled for next week and they hope to star.! the project next week. 2. Ordinance #49 - Noise City Attorney Hoeft indicated that if Council makes any substantive changes, another public hearing would have to be noticed. He further commented that changes to the numbers in the decibel chart would be considered substantive. Mayor Sweeney indicated he had a decibel meter in his truck and the background noise level in his truck which is a 2002 one-ton, crew cab, diesel pick-up with four wheel drive and a topper was 75 and above depending on the type of surface he was driving on. He then indicated he had the meter with him at the Phil Todd Benefit and out in front of the band the level went between 90 and 98 where he was standing serving food. Council Member Broussard Vickers indicated they crossed the street and were at 85 and did not have to scream to hold a conversation. Mayor Sweeney indicated that considering the ambient noise level is 70 to 75 in most areas, it would be hard to enforce the ordinance with the lower numbers that are currently in it. Council Member Broussard Vickers commented that this is all about the noise downtown and the City is looking at rewriting an entire ordinance for a couple of complaints and has not sat outside in that area to see what the number is. Council Member Lee indicated he had taken readings in the area in question and the ~~ numbers were between 65 and 70 with no extra noise. IV'-- Council Member Capra commented that the reading at the property line with the band playing was 69 but on the steps the reading was 83. Page 3 of 14 City of Centerville October 8, 2003 Council Meeting Minutes Council Member Broussard Vickers commented the level went to the 60's inside the house. Council Member Capra expressed concern with taking the reading at the property line. Council Member Lee commented that living across the street from two bars you would have to expect a certain amount of noise. Council Member Broussard Vickers suggested raising the lower number but change the times from 10:00 p.m. to 9:00 p.m. as a compromise for both sides. City Attorney Hoeft commented that the numbers should be set high enough to account for the ambient noise level or it would be impossible to prosecute. Council Member Capra commented that she did not feel the City should figure in traffic. City Attorney Hoeft indicated that traffic is part of the ambient noise level and should be figured in. City Attorney Hoeft indicated that the City has a general prohibition against noise that is not related to the noise level table. He further commented that the City would need to consider all areas of the City when figuring the noise levels not just one area. City Attorney Hoeft indicated that some activity may not rise to the level of a decibel violation but may be a violation of the general noise prohibition of the ordinance. Council Member Broussard Vickers indicated that about the only thing not exempted is music playing, all the other things are exempted. Council Member Capra asked how many Council Members would be interested in having the noise ordinance changed from 7:00~.m. to 9:00 p.m. The consensus was that Members were not interested in changing to 9:00 p.m. Council discussed the noise ordinance and decided that each Member should provide proposed levels to Staff for compilation and discussion at the next meeting. Motion by Council Member Capra., seconded bv Council Member Lee to continue the public bearinS!:. All in favor. Motion carried unanimously. VII. NEW BUSINESS I. Sales Tax Audit Ms. Paulseth indicated the City was told this was a random audit and noted one had not been done here for 7 or 8 years. Page4ofl4 City of Centerville October 8, 2003 COlUlcil Meeting Minutes Mayor Sweeney indicated the state charged for people who did services for the City but did not breakout the labor and materials. He then commented that if the state applies the same standard to the private sector, it could cause major issues and it concerns him that this type of thing sets a precedent. Council Member Broussard Vickers asked whether this requirement was known to the City. Ms. Paulseth indicated that it was. She then provided an example of a sign that was made for the City and the person charged the City $300 but dj,d not break out labor and materials so the City had to pay sales tax because it was not able to show that sales tax was paid on the materials. Council Member Lee commented that 2002 was a clean year and complimented Ms. Paulseth. - . _ b> Ms. Paulseth credited the account clerk for watching the invoices very closely. ;;~'(j'f r' ~ 2. Schedule TIP Work Session - Sedona Homes 11 f. rtr ~ >u ~ fY Y~~"Q-o- . Mayor Sweeney indicated he met with Sedona Homes to discuss a proposal for the watbr \i~~ tower area and downtown. He then asked Staff to set a work session to discuss TIF and downtown redevelopment. As a side note, the Mayor indicated the meeting occurred over lunch and he paid for his own lunch. Council Member Capra indicated she would prefer to hold the discussion at a Council meeting because the public needs to know about TIF. Mayor Sweeney indicated that a work session is a noticed public meeting and he would prefer to schedule a work session to provide the parties with enough time to make a proposal with potential significant financial impact to them. Council Member Capra indicated she would like to have the TIF auditor from Abdo, Abdo, Eick and Meyer attend the meeting if TIP is going to be discussed. Mayor Sweeney indicated that Mr. Kellier had offered to provide a TIF expert that does a lot of work with White Bear Township at his expense for the presentation. He then said he would prefer that the City not expend any funds on consultants until, or if, there is interest on behalf of the City in the proposal. Council Member Capra indicated she would like to use Abdo. There was Council consensus to let Mr. Kellier bring the TIP person along and wait to hire someone for consultation until, or if, the City is interested in the proposal. Page 5 of 14 City of Centerville October 8, 2003 COlDlcil Meeting Minutes Council set a work session for Monday, October 20,2003 at 6:30 p.m. to discuss TIF and economic development. 3. Ordinance #4 - Zoning Permit Amendment (Accessory Structures/Fences) Ms. Moore-Sykes indicated that Staff had proposed the idea of a permit for accessory structures and fences to the Planning and Zoning Commission previously as a way of eliminating or reducing some of the issues Staff has with them, but the Planning and Zoning Commission was not in favor of adding another permit fee. She then said that Staff would like to suggest that the permit fee for accessory structures and fences be reconsidered. Council directed Staff to have the Planning and Zoning Commission discuss the matter and come to Councii with a recommendation on an appropriate permitting fee for accessory structures and fences. Mayor Sweeney asked that Staff and the Commission consider the fee carefully and assure that it covers Staff time but is not too high because the permit process will not help Staff if residents feel it is too high and do not apply for permits. 4. Parks and Recreation Committee Recommendation Council indicated this recommendation should be held over until it is determined whether the development will proceed. vm. OLD BUSINESS 1. Pheasant Marsh. Phase ill - Developer's Agreement & Final Plat Ms. Moore-Sykes indicated this item was tabled from the last meeting. Council M~mber Capra asked whether there had been any progress on the issue of the waiver. City Attorney Hoeft indicated that he has no issue with regard to the sidewalk, trailways and mailbox language added by Staff. He then commented that Mr. Runkle may wish to comment on the escrow for the mailboxes. Mr. Dale Runkle, Ground Development, indicated that he does have a concern about the escrow for the mailboxes as it was not required in the other two phases and mailboxes were installed. He then said that they have arrangements in place to have the mailboxes installed and he does not feel the need for another escrow. He also commented that he does not see where the ordinance requires it. Mr. Runkle indicated he was concerned with the language added on the top of Page 6 where it says the developer will construct concrete sidewalk on the north and west side of Page 60f14 City of Centerville October 8, 2003 Council Meeting Minutes Dupre as the feasibility study for the street and utility improvements included the sidewalk and that will be done at the same time. City Attorney Hoeft suggested amending the language to state that the sidewalk: comes under the street and utility improvement by indicating the developer hereby requests the City construct a concrete sidewalk. He then indicated that he would work out the language and provide it to the developer. Ms. Moore-Sykes indicated that the Parks and Recreation Committee had asked for language in the developer's agreement to ensure that the sidewalk: and trailways were constructed. Ms. Karen Marty indicated she had nothing new to say with regard to the waiver. Council Member Broussard Vickers asked if the developer was willing to sign a new waiver. Ms. Karen Marty indicated the developer is not willing to sign a new waiver. Council Member Broussard Vickers asked for the options from the City Attorney. City Attorney Hoeft indicated the City could proceed without a waiver, make the assessment and wait fo see if the amounts over the waiver will be contested. He then said there is a cost to defend a contested assessment but he feels the developer's agreement obligates the developer to pay for those costs. He further commented that, other than for entertainment value, he does not 'know why the developer would challenge the assessments because he feels that the benefit can easily be proven. Council Member Capra indicated that Ms. Marty had stated that there was an original waiver in the original agreement and that is why they do not want to waiver this agreement. City Attorney Hoeft indicated the developer says the City approved the development plan for all construction and waived up to $1.8 million so that is what they are obligated to so the question is whether the City is obligated to do the 429 process on this portion of the land and he is not convinced that the City is. He then indicated that the City has given independent approval by this body for each phase and just because it is indicated in the initial agreement that the City would proceed with the 429 process with a waiver of X number of dollars does not commit the City to going forward with 429 process. He further commented that the interesting question is if the City does not go . forward with 429 process for the final phase and waiver of $1.8 million he would anticipate that the developer would say that the $1.8 million was for a three phase project and try to factor out the first two phases so the City may have an assessment challenge even if Phase ill does not go forward. Page 7 of 14 City of Centerville October 8, 2003 Council Meeting Minutes Mayor Sweeney indicated that he is nervous due to the comment that Ms. Marty made that the developer was not consulted when the bids came in higher than the estimates. He further commented that makes him feel that if this goes fOlWard and the amounts are over the $1.8 million the developer will contest it and the City is faced with legal costs to defend. Mayor Sweeney asked what the original date for Phase ill was before it was moved up. Council discussed it and thought that the original date was 2006 but was not sure. Council Member Capra commented that the City was shorted approximately $130,000 with the first 429 process. She then asked if Ms. Paulseth had the exact figures. Ms. Paulseth indicated that she has been figuring about $150,000 depending upon interest rates. Council Member Lee indicated he is not interested in moving fOlWard without the waiver. Council Member Paar indicated he does not want the City to get stuck again with extra costs to develop the property. He then said he does not understand how they can contest something that they gave the City the authority to do through the 429 process. Council Member Broussard Vickers commented that the City did not lose the money because of the waiver issue, it was lost because of the bonding situation and prepayment. She then said that this bond would be set up differently to account for early payoffs. She further commented that the City knows that the costs are going beyond the $1.8 million and it is likely that the developer would contest the amounts over that amount. Council Member Lee indicated that, based on comments made previously by the developer and counsel, he would assume there will be a challenge. Council Member Broussard Vickers asked how the City would deny the 429 process. City Attorney Hoeft indicated that not approving the developer's agreement would mean the 429 process does not go fOlWard and the developer would have to finance the project differently. City Attorney Hoeft indicated there would be a different development contract for improvements with escrows required and the developer would need to have its own engineer and own contractors and the work would have to be done to City specifications. Mayor Sweeney indicated the developer would be responsible to pay for City inspections as well. City Attorney J!:oeft asked Council to provide direction to the developer as to how it wished to proceed. Page 8 of 14 City of Centervllle October 8, 2003 Council Meeting Minutes. Mayor Sweeney indicated that Council wants to see a waiver for the costs for Phase ill or it is not pr.epared to move forward with the 429 process. Ms. Karen Marty indicated that they were aware that Council might take this action and she thinks they have discussed everything that they are going to discuss and could not bring anything different back at another meeting. She then said that, unless Council has specific direction for them, she does not feel it is necessary to table the matter. Council Member Broussard Vickers indicated the City is not asking the developer to assume financial risk but is just asking the developer to pay ~e assessments for what the property improvements cost so the City is ensured that the costs are not picked up by the City. She further commented that this is not a case of beefing up the costs, the costs are what they are for the improvements and the City wants the developer to agree to pay those to limit fi.n.ancial risk to the taxpayers of this City. Council Member Capra asked if the developer was open to considering financing the improvements rather than the 429 process. Ms. Marty indicated the developer did a waiver based on the estimate for 429 improvements for all three phases. She then said that they believe that the City has some obligation to follow through with its side of the bargain which is to construct those 429 improvements. Shtf then said the City can do what it wants and the developer will respond accordingly. She further commented that it is unfortunate that the City incurred costs but she does not see where it is possible for the developer to write a blank check to the City for a waiver. Council Member Broussard Vickers indicated that the City is not asking for a blank check but an additional specific amount on the waiver for the costs, for Phase m. She further commented that the assessment was an estimate and all parties knew that in the beginning. City Attorney Hoeft responded by indicating that the original waiver did not obligate the City to construct under the 429 process. Mr. Peterson indicated that he is in the process of working with Staff on the numbers for Phase II for the assessment hearing on November 12,2003 and he expects to have those figures for the next meeting so that the City will have a better idea of where it is at on the $1.8. City Attorney Hoeft indicated that counsel for Ground Development has already initiated a challenge to the assessments whether it is a challenge to Phase I, Phase I and II or Phase III, there is a challenge riding out there. Council Member Broussard Vickers asked how the developer could challenge when they agreed not to. Page 9 of 14 City of Centerville October 8, 2003 COImciI Meeting Minutes City Attorney Hoeft indicated the developer felt that what was being assessed for Phase I and/or II was somehow more than what should have been assessed under the estimated costs. He then said that brings back the comment that, if the City does not go through with Phase III, and the developer challenges the City on whether it is obligated he anticipates that the developer will follow through with the dispute on the assessment for phases I and II over some extrapolated number over the $1.8 so there may still be an issue with one and/or two. Ms. Marty asked what Council did because she heard a public hearing opened. Mayor Sweeney indicated that the noise ordinance public hearing was opened but no one was present to speak at it so the Pheasant Marsh matter was moved up to accommodate the parties. Ms. Marty commented that Council looked at this issue that is on the agenda and chose to take no action. City Attorney Hoeft indicated that was correct. Mr. Runkle from Ground Development and his counsel, Ms. Marty, left the meeting and returned a minute later. Ms. Marty then asked for permission to address Council. Ms. Marty indicated they would like to request some action one way or another on the -- matter. City Attorney Hoeft indicated that Council did not have to take any action as this is a negotiation over the development agreement. He then said the agreement, as proposed, is not acceptable to Council and Council has indicated what it wants the developer to do and, until there is a revised development agreement, there is no approval. Council Member Capra commented that the developer needed to take out the 429 or add the waiver in. Council Member Capra asked that Ms. Marty and Mr. Hoeft work on the matter. City Attorney Hoeft indicated he would look at any proposed additional language or would anticipate receiving pleadings. 2. Resolution #03-054 - Water Tower Motion by Council Member Broussard Vickers. seconded by Council Member Lee to approve Resolution #03-054 as presented. All in favor. Motion carried unanimously. ' Mayor Sweeney indicated that when he met with Sedona Homes they indicated they would work with the City for storage during construction. Page 10 of 14 City of Centerville October 8, 2003 COImcil Meeting Minutes 3. Hunter's Crossing Developer's Agreement (Modifications) Council Member Broussard Vickers asked if a waiver was done on this development. City Attorney Hoeft indicated that Staff would prepare a waiver and work with Mr. Peterson for the figures. Motion by Council Member Capra., seconded bv Council Member Lee to approve the Hunter's Crossin!! Developer's A!!reement subiect to receivin!! a waiver from Mr. Carlson in the amount of $1.75 million. All in favor. Motion carried unanimouslv. 4. Resolution #03-055 - Paulsen Request (Street Easement Vacation) City Attorney Hoeft indicated that he has been working with the City Clerk who has been working with the property owners to obtain a legal description for the easement. He then said there may need to be a survey done if the legal cannot be obtained. IX. ANNOUNCEMENTSIUPDATES 1. Lifetime Achievement Award Motion bv Council Member Capra., seconded bv Council Member Paar to approve the lifetime achievement award nominee in memory of Chauncey Barrett. All in favor. Motion carried unanimously. Mayor Sweeney offered congratulations to the family of Chauncey Barrett. Council Member Capra indicated the nomination was made by Ms. Land and that family had a terrible tragedy this week and she would like to send a letter to them notifying them that the award will be given when their schedules can accommodate it. 2. Mound Trail Reconstruction Mr. Peterson indicated that the street is to be paved this week. 3. Police Task Force- - Council Member Lee provided an update on his police task force meeting indicating that the format of the police commission and the formula will be discussed for possible changes. Council Member Lee indicated that there would need to be an all City meeting to discuss . the structure of the police commission as well as the formula for funding prior to the end of the year. He also indicated that there were discussions concerning a potential new building. Page 11 of14 City ofCentervll1e October 8, 2003 Council Meeting Minutes 4. 7016 & 7020 Brian Court (ProPerty Line Dispute) Ms. Moore-Sykes indicated that Staff has learned that the shed in question is located within a drainage and utility easement, was constructed in 1997 and is 8 x 10. She then said the shed should-be moved out of the drainage easement. City Attorney Hoeft indicated that Staff would send a letter to the resident asking that the shed be moved once he works with the City Clerk to determine what the standard is that needs to be met. 5. Liquor License Ms. Moore-Sykes indicated the liquor licenses are in need of renewal and all that information was sent to the liquor establishments. She then indicated she had provided information from. the fire department on some compliance issues that will need to be resolved prior to renewal. 6. Street Reconstruction Plan Ms. Moore-Sykes indicated that the City needed to set a hearing date for the street reconstruction plan but the schedules for November and December are heavy. Council asked that it be placed on the January agenda. Mr. Peterson indicated that it would be preferable to have it on the December 10, 2003 agenda. 7. Fete des Lacs Mayor Sweeney indicated that Mr. Thill had sent a thank: you note to the City for the help with the parade. He then read the note and thanked Mr. Thill and those that volunteered on the parade for their assistance. . 8. Temporary Signs Council Member Capra indicated that temporary signs seem to be popping up all over town. Ms. Moore-Sykes indicated that all of them have permits and noted that Staff is on top of -them. 9. CDA Information Ms. Moore-Sykes indicated she received information that Coon Rapids met with the larger cities within the County and has now invited smaller cities to be involved in a task Page 12 of 14 ,. .. City of Centerville October 8, 2003 COlUlcil Meeting Minutes force on this issue. She then indicated that she would provide the date of the meeting when it is made known to her. Mayor Sweeney indicated he does not want to be taxed any amount to pay for development on the other side of the County. . Council Member Capra indicated she heard that there is to be a two story senior housing building. Ms. Moore-Sykes indicated she has heard nothing on that. Council Member Broussard Vickers asked that Staff respond to Eagle Pass and indicate which items are the City's obligation through the developer's agreement and which issues are for them to handle with the developer. - Council Member Capra asked that a newsletter discussion be added to the next agenda. She then said she would like to have a newsletter to keep residents informed because the week in review is no longer published. Ms. Moore-Sykes indicated that the week in review gets put out on the Internet. Council Member Capra indicated she would like Council to reconsider publishing the >-- week in review twice per month in the Q11ad for $5,000 per year versus the cost of a newsletter. Council Member Paar indicated that if someone cannot get the week in review off of the Internet they should call City Hall and have it mailed to them or come and pick it up. Council Member Capra indicated she feels Council has limited communications with the public. Council Member Broussard Vickers indicated the City has limited communication to those that actually want it. She then said that it is available at City Hall, on the Internet, and by mail to anyone who asks for it and she does not feel that it is cost-effective to pay $5,000 to publish the week in review since there have been few or no requests for mailing it. Council Member Capra asked that the utility billing contain a notation that the week in review is available on the Internet or by mail by request. Ms. Moore-Sykes indicated the week in review is on a shared file so anyone at City Hall can access it and print it should someone stop in and want a copy. X. CLOSED - EXECUTIVE SESSION 1. Union Contract Negotiations & Public Works Staffing _ Page 13 of 14 " .. City of CentervilIe October 8, 2003 COlmcil Meeting Minutes Council recessed to executive session at 8:40 p.m. 1. Union Contract Negotiations & Public Works Staffing Council and the City Administrator discussed the I.O.U.E. Local No. 49 contract proposals as presented previously to the City Administrator. Future staffing issues for the Public Works Department were discussed. The Executive Session was closed at 9: 17 p.m. XI. ADJO~NT Motion by Council Member Broussard Vicken. seconded bv Council Member Lee to adiourn the October 8. 2003 City Council Meetinl! at 9:17 P.rn. All in favor. Motion carried unanimously. Transcribed by: Joan Lenzmeier, Recording Secretary TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc. Page 14 of 14 .. Update October 20 through October 22, 2003 Receipts $18,582.04 Disbursements $11,987.05 CITY OF CENTERVILLE 10/22/034:28 PM Page 1 Cash Receipts October 20 thru October 22, 2003 Tran Batch Amount Date Refer Comments Name Account Oeser FUND 101 GENERAL FUND Act Type G $0.10 1012012003 o UB UR Receipt Group 01 1 0-2O..Q3u1 G 101-11500 Accounts Receivable $1.80 10/2012003 o UB UR Receipt Group 01 10"20-03UT1 G 101-11500 Accounts Receivable $0.58 10/21/2003 o UB UR Receipt Group 01 102103UT-1 G 101-11500 Accounts Receivable $0.50 10/2112003 o 6873 MALLARD 10-2103 G 101-24502 Mech. Permit Surcharge $1.00 10/22/2003 o 1667 PEL nER LAKE DR- 10-22-03 G 101-24500 Bldg. Permit Surcharge $6.50 10/2212003 o 7112 BRIAN DR - 03-184 10-22-03 G 101-24500 Bldg. Permit Surcharge $15.00 10/2212003 o 7131 -20TH AVE - C03-036 10-22-03 G 1Q1-245OO Bldg. Permit Surcharge $0.50 10/2212003 o 6870 MALLARD WAY - 10-22-03 G 101-24503 EIec. Permit Surcharge Act $25.98 Act Type R $2,900.00 10/20/2003 o LIQUOR & TOBACCO 10-2O-Q3 R 101-00000-32100 RentaVUquor $20.00 10/2112003 o 6873 MALLARD 10-2103 R 101-00000-32210 Building/Mach. $279.30 10I22l2OO3 o 7112 BRIAN DR - 03-184 10-22-03 R 101-00000-32210 Building/Mach. $110.00 10/2212003 o 6870 MALLARD WAY - 10-22-03 R 101-00000-32225 Electrical $92.80 10/2212003 o 1667 PEL nER LAKE DR - 10-22-03 R 101-00000-32210 Building/Mach. $346.60 10/22/2003 o 7131 -20TH AVE - C03-D36 10-22-03 R 101-00000-32210 Building/Mech. Act $3,748.70 FUND $3,n4.68 FUND 415 STORM WATER IMP PROJECTS Act Type R $136.83 10/20/2003 o UB Receipt Serv 10 DRAIN 1o-2O..Q3UT1 R 415-00000-32350 Storm Water $30.00 10/2012003 o UB Receipt Serv 10 DRAIN 1o-2O..Q3UT2 R 415-00000-32350 Storm Water $0.73 10/20/2003 o UB Receipt Serv Pen 10 10-2O-Q3ut R 415-00000-32350 Storm Water $79.32 10/2012003 o UB Receipt Serv 10 DRAIN 10-2O..Q3ut R 415-00000-32350 Storm Water $1.63 10/2112003 o UB Receipt Serv Pen 10 102103UT-1 R 415-OOQOO..3235O Storm Water $35.00 10/2112003 o US Receipt Serv 10 DRAIN 10-2103ut R 415-00000-32350 Storm Water $34420 10/21/2003 o US Receipt Serv 10 DRAIN 102103UT-1 R 415-00000-32350 Storm Water $14.89 10/21/2003 o UB Receipt Serv 10 DRAIN 102103UT-2 R 415-00000-32350 Storm Water $10.00 10/21/2003 o UB Receipt Serv 10 DRAIN 102103ut R 415-00000-32350 Storm Water $0.50 10/22/2003 o UB Receipt Serv Pen 10 10-22-o3UT R 415-00000-32350 Storm Water $59.44 10/22/2003 o UB Receipt Serv 10 DRAIN 1o-22-o3UT R 415-00000-32350 Storm Water Act $712.54 -FUND $712.54 FUND 601 WATER FUND Act Type G $8.18 10/2112003 o US Receipt Sure 1 SALES 102103UT-1 G 601-20800 State Sales & Use Tax $1.11 10/22/2003 o UB Receipt Sure 1 SALES 10-22-o3UT G 601-20800 State Sales & Use Tax Act $9.29 Act Type R 10/20/2003 o UB Receipt Serv 1 WATER 10-2O-Q3ut R 601-00000-37100 Water Sales $634.68 $7.61 10/20/2003 o US Receipt Sarv 30 WATER 10-2O-Q3ut R 601-00000-34400 Safe Drlnking $0.75 10/20/2003 o US Receipt Serv Pen 30 10-2O-o3ut R 601-00000-34400 Safe Drlnklng $4.35 10/20/2003 o US Receipt Sarv Pen 1 10-2O-Q3ut R 601-00000-37100 Water Sales $193.80 10/20/2003 o US Receipt Serv 1 WATER 10-2O-Q3UT2 R 601-00000-37100 Water Sales $1,701.39 10/20/2003 o UB Receipt Serv 1 WATER 10-2O..Q3UT1 R 601-00000-37100 Water Sales $241.29 10/21/2003 o US Receipt Serv 1 WATER 102103UT-2 R 601-00000-37100 Water Sales $435.20 10/21/2003 o UB Receipt Serv 1 WATER 1 0-21 03u1 R 601-00000-37100 Water Sales $205.70 10/21/2003 o UB Receipt Sarv 1 WATER 102103u1 R 601-00000-37100 Water Sales ~ / $125.80 10/21/2003 o UB Receipt Serv 15 WATER 102103UT-1 R 601-0??oo-37100 Water Sales $3,554.66 10121/2003 o UB Receipt Serv 1 WATER 102103UT-1 R 601..QO()()()..371 00 Water Sales $292.40 1012212003 o UB Receipt Serv 1 WATER 1o-22-o3UT R 601-00000-37100 Water Sales $17.00 10l22l2oo3 o US Receipt Serv 15 WATER 1o-22-o3UT R 601-0??oo-37100 Water Sales $5.21 10/2212003 o UB Receipt Serv 30 WATER 1o-22-o3UT R 601-o0OOO-34400 Safe Drinking $0.52 1012212003 o US Receipt Serv Pen 30 1o-22-o3UT R 601-0??oo-34400 Safe Drinking $4.76 10/2212003 o UB Receipt Serv Pen 1 1o-22-o3UT R 601-o0OOO-37100 Water Sales Act $7,425.12 FUND $7,434.41 FUND 602 SEWER FUND Act Type R $1,341.03 10/2012003 o UB Receipt Serv 6 SEWER 10-2O-Q3UT1 R 602-o0OOO-37200 Sewer Safes $245.00 10/20/2003 o UB Recefpt Serv 6 SEWER 10-2O-Q3UT2 R 602-0??oo-37200 Sewer Sales $m.33 10/20/2003 o UB Receipt Serv 6 SewER 10-2O-Q3ut R 602-00000-37200 Sewer Sales $7.15 10/20/2003 o UB Receipt Serv Pen 6 10-2O-Q3ut R 602-o0OOO-37200 Sewer Sales $2,772.52 10121/2003 o UB Receipt Serv 6 SEWER 102103UT-1 R 602-00000-37200 Sewer Sales $343.00 10/2112003 o UB Receipt Sarv 6 SEWER 1 0-21 03ut R 602-o0OOO-37200 Sewer Sales $145.92 10/21/2003 o UB Receipt Serv 6 SEWER 102103UT-2 R 602-0??oo-37200 Sewer Sales $343.00 10/2112003 o UB Receipt Serv 18 102103UT-1 R 602-00000-37200 Sewer Sales $98.00 10121/2003 o UB Receipt Serv 6 SEWER 102103ut R 602-o0OOO-37200 Sewer Sales $49.00 1012212003 o UB Receipt Serv 18 1o-22-o3UT R 602-00000-37200 Sewer Sales $533.56 1012212003 o UB Receipt Sarv 6 SEWER 10-22-o3UT R 602-o0OOO-37200 Sewer Sales $4.90 1012212003 o UB Receipt Serv Pen 6 1o-22-o3UT R 602-0??oo-37200 Sewer Sales Act $6,660.41 FUND $6,660.41 $18,582.04 *Check Summary Register@) OCTOBER 2003 Page 1 Name 10100 MAIN STREET BANK Paid Chk# 018574 AVLIC Paid Chk# 018575 BROCK WHITE COMPANY Paid Chk# 018576 GOLDENGATE INTERNET Paid Chk# 018577 HUGO FEED MILL Paid Chk# 018578 INSTRUMENTAL RESEARCH Paid Chk# 018579 IRSIMAIN STREET BANK Paid Chk# 018580 MAGUIRE IRON INC Paid Chk# 018581 MENARDS - FOREST LAKE Paid Chk# 018582 MINNEGASCO* Paid Chk# 018583 MINNESOTA DEPT OF Paid Chk# 018584 MONTAlN, PAUL Paid Chk# 018585 NATIONWIDE RETIREMENT Paid Chk# 018586 PALZER, PAUL Paid Chk# 018587 PEIL, KATHY Paid Chk# 018588 PUBLIC EMPLOYEES Paid Chk# 018589 QWEST Paid Chk# 018590 SWEENEY, TERRY Paid Chk# 018591 TRU GREEN - CHEM LAWN Paid Chk# 018592 UNITED PRODUCTS Check Date 1012212003 1012212003 10/2212003 10/2212003 1012212003 1012212003 1012212003 10/2212003 1012212003 10/2212003 1012212003 10/2212003 10/2212003 10/2212003 10/2212003 10/2212003 1012212003 1012212003 1012212003 Total Checks Check Amt $456.00 DEF COMP - WIH 10-23-03 $102.70 SKATING RINK $50.00 INTERNET SERVICE - 982280 $3.75 RECOIL ROPE $34.00 OCTOBER 2003 WATER SAMPLES -TE $3,478.36 PAYROLL WIH 10-23-03 $895.00 SERVICE WATER TOWER $141.54 SUPPLIES $210.30 6970 LAMOTTE DR - SERV THRU 10 $554.30 PAYROLL WIH 10-23-03 $141.25 OVER PAID -BEST PRACTICES $729.00 DEP COMPWIH 10-23-03 $7.56 MILEAGE TO BLDG SEMINAR 10-16- $223.84 REIMBURSE FOR MATERIALS FOR WA $1,596.27 PAYROLL WIH 10-23-03 $60.74 651-762-9261 - SERV THRU11-12- $110.00 REIMBURSE FOR LUNCH AT WARMING $1,600.71 LAMOTTE PARK LAWN CARE $1,591.73 SHINGLES & ACCESSORIES $11,987.05 TO: Economic Development Committee Memben FROM: Kim Stephan '?b SUBJECT: EDC Recommendations DATE: October 16, 2003 New Resident Packet_ The following memo was included in the Economic Development Committee's September packet from City Administrator Moore-Sykes regarding the New Resident Packet. There is CU17'ently a section on the city's web site titletl'New Resident InfOl7lUllion' where itifonnt.1Jion is adJed lIS time permits. The city now hos a scllllner which makes it relo:tWely etISJ to copy documents, convert them to Adobe and transfer them to the web site. The trail -- 1IUIJl is cummtly on the weIJ site, lIS are the zoning and a.ddress 1IUIJl& EtlI:h sedion included in the brochure portion of the new resident folder is already updllted on the web site - Parks, Lakes & Trails, H"1StorJ & Tradition, Gfl11e1'IU1IJmt & Services, Education and Community. The most commonly requested orditumeeS are adJed to the New Resident Packet, lIS is permit infonnt.1Jioll. Ordinances are availllb1e on the web site and there is a section for permits and building inspection infOl7lUllion. Considering there are lfHJ+ New Resident Packets renudning, the expense of protlJlcing a new JHlCket (14,000), budget cuts and the fad that all the injonnt.1Jion supplied in the packet is availo.b1e on the web site and easily printed for those without intemet tlI:cess, stoff would like the Economic Development Committee to re-evaluate the necessity of ordering a New Resident Packet. Other considerations are the amollnt of stoff time inl'olved in copying information for the packet, Pllttlng the packet together and postage for each packet ($3.87). WIuIt staff is proposing is to send new residents a welcome letter, a brochure on the city's web site and a business cardfrom the aty AtlministratDr. The committee discussed the various options and determined they would still like to see something available to present to new residents such as a tri-fold brochure with web site information and pertinent phone numbers included with a welcome letter and a Business Directory. Ms. Stephan informed the committee that City Hall is out of the 2003 Business . Directories and these should be updated and re-ordered also. Staifwill contact Ms. Kim. Wtlcox, Media Iunction to prepare an estimate for the next EDC meeting. Motion was made by Vice-Chairperson Backman, second~ by Committee Member Burke to rescind the original motion to purchase the New Resident Packet from New Impressions, IDe. for $4,000 (down payment of 52,000 from the 2002 EDC budget, remainder of balance from the 2003 EDe budget) with the monies to go ba~k to the EDC budget AD in favor. Motion carried unanimously. Motion was made by Committee Member Burke, seconded by Committee Member Scheller to research a downsized new resident "brochure, which would include a trail map and new resident & business information for a more cost etTectiv~ communication tooL All in favor. Motion carried unanimously. Ouarterlv Event The Economic Development Committee had tentatively scheduled a Fall Speaker Meeting for local business owners to be held in October, but due to the September committee meeting being cancelled there was not-sufficient time to plan this. The committee members would still like to offer a speaker meeting yet this year on a subject relevant to small businesses. Ms. Stephan informed the committee that there is a Centennial Lakes Police / Business Owner meeting scheduled for December 11, 2003 at 3:00 p.m. and perhaps the committee could coordinate something to be held following this meeting. Vice-Chairperson Backman will coordinate this effort with the police representative and a speaker from Century College. Motion was made by Committee Member Scheller, seconded by Committee Member Burke to promote and support the December 11, 2003 Centennial Lakes Pollee I Business Owner meeting and sponsor a speaker meeting immediately following on. a related topic. All in favor. Motion carried onpnimously. erviCee 'Est:a6lisfid 1857 Receipts, Disbursements & Payroll October 9 through October 17, 2002 ~eceipts Disbursements Payroll (10-9-03) $27,654.53 $16,531.36 $10,914.48 ...... An update will be handed out on 10-22-03 for disbursements & receipts from 10-20-03 through 10-22-03. Amount CITY OF CENTERVILLE Cash Receipts October 9 thru October 17,2003 Tran Date Refer Comments FUND 101 GENERAL FUND Act Type G Act Act Type R Act $5.50 $2.00 $0.50 $1,500.00 $2.00 $5.62 $0.50 $0.50 $0.50 $0.50 $0.50 $1.50 -$46.80 -$80.80 $0.50 $0.50 -$433.24 $0.50 $7.50 $0.50 $968.28 $75.00 $244.30 $200.97 $139.80 $2.565.00 $0.78 $110.00 $85.00 $2.116.13 $104.30 $1.44 $10.00 $60.00 $100.00 $135.00 $20.00 $110.00 $70.00 $170.00 $300.00 $50.00 $6,667.72 10/9/2003 10/9/2003 101912003 10/1 0/2003 10/10/2003 10/1512003 10/15/2003 10/1512003 10/15/2003 10/1512003 10/15/2003 10/15/2003 10/1512003 10/15/2003 10/15/2003 10/15/2003 10/15/2003 10/1512003 10/17/2003 10/1712003 10/9/2003 10/9/2003 10/9/2003 10/1012003 10/15/2003 10/1512003 10/15/2003 10/15/2003 10/1512003 10/15/2003 10/1512003 10/15/2003 . 10/1512003 10/15/2003 10/1512003 10/1512003 10/15/2003 10/15/2003 10/16/2003 10117/2003 10/1712003 Batch Name 10/17/0311:53AM Page 1 Account Descr o 1764 MAIN STREET - 10-9-03 G 101-24500 Bldg. Permit Surcharge o 7016 BRIAN CT - 03-179 10-09-03 G 101-24500 Bldg. Permit Surcharge o 1751 PARTRIDGE PL - 10-9-03 G 101-24501 Plmblng Permit o 1765 PARTRIDGE PL 10-10-03 G 101-24505 Sod Escrow o 1885 PRAIRIE DR - 03-181 10-10-03 G 101-24500 Bldg. Permit Surcharge o UB UR Receipt Group 01 1O-15-03UT G 101-11600 Accounts Receivable o 1nO PARTRIDGE PL - 10-15-03 G 101-24501 Plmblng Permit o 6872 DEER CT - P03-042 10-15-03 G 101-24501 Plmblng Permit o 1715 DUPRE RD - C03-091 10-15-03 G 101-24503 Elec. Permit Surcharge o 6872 DEER CT - C03-092 10-15-03 G 101-24503 Elec. Permit Surcharge 6875 MALLARD WAY - 10-15-03 G 101-24502 Mach. Permit Surcharge o 7167 SHAD AVE - 03-183 10-15-03 G 101-24500 Bldg. Permit Surcharge o UB UR Receipt Group 02 101503UTADJ G 101-11500 Accounts Receivable o US UR Receipt Group 00 101503UTADJ G 101-11500 Accounts Receivable o 6870 MALLARY WAY - 10-15-03 G 101-24501 Plmbing Permit o 6872 DEER COURT - 10-15-03 G 101-24502 Mach. Permit Surcharge o US UR Receipt Group 01 101503UTADJ G 101-11500 Accounts Receivable o 7265 MOUND TRAIL - 10-15-03 G 101-24501 Plmbing Permit o 7050 20TH AVE S - M03-05810-17-03 G 101-24502 Mach. Permit Surcharge o 6965 MEADOW COURT - 10-17-03 G 101-24503 Elec. Permit Surcharge o 1751 PARTRIDGE PL- 10-9-03 o 1764 MAIN STREET - 10-9-03 o 7016 BRIAN CT - 03-179 10-09-03 o 1885 PRAIRIE DR - 03-181 10-10-03 o LIQUOR LICENSE 10-15-03 o COPIES 10-15-03 o 6872 DEER CT - C03-092 10-15-03 o 6870 MALl.ARYWAY - 10-15-03 o SEPT. FINES & FEES 10-15-03 o 7167SHADAVE-03-183 10-15-03 o UB Receipt Serv 102 10-15-03UT o MAP 10-15-03 o 6872 DEER CT - P03-042 10-15-03 o 6872 DEER COURT - 10-15-03 o 7265 MOUND TRAIL - 10-15-03 6875 MALLARD WAY - 10-15-03 o 1715 DUPRE RD - C03-091 10-15-03 o 1nO PARTRIDGE PL- 10-15-03 o OFF SALE LIQUOR 101603 o 7050 20TH AVE S - M03-05810-17-03 o 6965 MEADOW COURT - 10-17-03 FUND $7,636.00 FUND 415 STORM WATER IMP PROJECTS Act Type R $21.00 $2.10 $5.00 $0.50 $76.50 10/9/2003 1019/2003 10/9/2003 10/9/2003 10/1512003 o UB Receipt Serv 10 DRAIN o US Receipt Serv Pen 10- o UB Receipt Serv 10 DRAIN o US Receipt Serv Pen 10 o UB Receipt Serv 10 DRAIN 1O-9003UT 10-9003UT 10-09-03UT 10-09-03UT 101503ut Cash Receipts October 9 thru October 17, 2003 R 101-00000-32180 Plumbing Permits R 101-00000-32210 Building/Mach. R 101-00000-32210 Building/Mach. R 101-00000-32210 Building/Mach. R 101-00000-32100 RentaVLlquor R 101-00000-34105 Sale of Maps and R 101-00000-32225 Electrlcal R 101-00000-32180 Plumbing Permits R 101-00000-35000 Fines and Forfeits R 101-00000-32210 Buildlng/Mech. R 101-00000-36200 Miscellaneous R 101-00000-34105 Sale of Maps and R 101-00000-32180 Plumbing Pennits R 101-00000-32210 Building/Mach. R 101-00000-32180 Plumbing Pennits R 101-00000-32210 Building/Mach. R 101-00000-32210 Building/Mach. R 101-00000-32180 Plumbing Pennits R 101-00000-32100 RentaVLlquor R 101-00000-32210 Building/Mach. R 101-00000-32225 Electrlcal R 415-00000-32350 Storm Water R 415-00000-32350 Storm Water R 415-00000-32350 Storm Water R 415-00000-32350 Storm Water R 415-00000-32350 Storm Water , Tran Batch Amount Date Refer Comments Name Account Oeser . $10.15 10115/2003 o US Receipt Serv Pen 10 1O-15-03UT R415-00D00-3235O Storm Water $5.02 10/1512003 o UB Receipt Serv Pen 10 101503ut R 415-00000-32350 Storm Water $1.63 10/15/2003 o US Receipt Serv Pen 10 10-15-03UT-1 R 415-00000-32350 Storm Water $23.56 10115/2003 o UB Receipt Serv 10 DRAIN 10-15-03UT-1 R 415-00000-32350 Storm Water $62.09 10/15/2003 o UB Receipt Serv 10 DRAIN 101503UTADJ R 415-00000-32350 Storm Water $153.00 10/15/2003 o UB Receipt Serv 10 DRAIN 1O-15-03UT R 415-00000-32350 Storm Water $1.55 10/16/2003 o UB Receipt Serv Pen 10 10-16-03UT R 415-00000-32350 Storm Water $21.13 10/16/2003 o US Receipt Serv 10 DRAIN 10-16-03UT R 415-00000-32350 Storm Water $1.34- 10/17/2003 o US Receipt Serv Pen 10 10-17 -D3UT R 415-00000-32350 Storm Water $21.27 10/17/2003 o US Receipt ~ 10 DRAIN 10-17-D3UT R 415-00000-32350 Storm Water Act $405.84 FUND $405.84 FUND 446 HUNTERS CROSSING PHASE II Act Type R $12.500.00 10/10/2003 0 ENGINEERING Ese- Ad. $12,500.00 FUND $12.500.00 FUND 601 WATER FUND Act Type G Ad. Act Type R $25.00 10/15/2003 $25.00 $5.21 10/9/2003 $0.52 101912003 $28.90 10/9/2003 $2.89 10/9/2003 $723.14 10/15/2003 $36.94 10/1512003 $2.40 10/1512003 $191.12 10/15/2003 $0.55 10/1512003 $5.64 10/15/2003 $396.01 10/1512003 $29.35 10/15/2003 $18.00 10/15/2003 $23.94 10/1512003 -$81.00 10/15/2003 $90.40 10/15/2003 $1.220.29 10/15/2003 $1.n. 10/15/2003 $0.33 10/1612003 $3.32 10/16/2003 $185.21 10/16/2003 $16.03 10/16/2003 $98.92 10/17/2003 $4.13 10/17/2003 $0.30 10/17/2003 . $2.99 10/17/2003 Ad. $3,007.30 FUND $3,032.30 FUND 602 SewER FUND Act Type R $24.50 $245.00 $4.90 $49.00 $113.34- $343.85 $20.05 $19.78 $271.92 $51.33 $1,605.02 101912003 10/9/2003 10/9/2003 10/9/2003 10/15/2003 10/15/2003 10/15/2003 10/1512003 10/15/2003 10/15/2003 10/15/2003 10-1O-D3 R 446-00000-36235 Escrow Deposits o US Receipt Sure 1 SALES 101503UTADJ G 601-20800 State Sales & Use Tax o US Receipt Serv 30 WATER 1O-D9-D3UT R 601-00000-34400 Safe Drinking o US Receipt Serv Pen 30 10-oe-03UT R 601-00000-34400 Safe Drinking o US Receipt Serv 1 WATER 1O-D9-D3UT R 601-00000-37100 Water Sales o US Receipt Serv Pen 1 1O-D9-D3UT R 601-00000-37100 Water Sales - 0 US Receipt Serv 1 WATER 101503ut R 601-o0OOO-37100 Water Sales o US ReceiptServ Pen 1 101503ut R 601-00000-37100 Water Sales o UB Receipt Serv Pen 30 10-15-D3UT R 601-00000-34400 Safe Drinking o US Receipt Serv 1 WA:rER 101503UTADJ R 601-00000-37100 Water Sales o UB Receipt Serv Pen 30 10-15-03UT-1 R 601-00000-344OO Safe Drinking o UB Receipt Serv 30 WATER 10-15-03UT-1 R 601-00000-34400 Safe Drinking o US Receipt Serv 1 WATER 10-15-03UT-1 R 601-00000-37100 Water Sales o UB Receipt Serv Pen 1 10-15-D3UT-1 R 601-o0OOO-37100 Water Sales o US Receipt Serv 30 WATER 101503ut R 601-00000-34400 Safe Drinking o US Receipt Serv 30 WATER 10-15-03UT R 601-D0000-34400 Safe Drinking o US Receipt Serv 40 101503UTADJ R 601-ooOOO-371ooWater Sales o US Receipt Serv Pen 1 10-15-03UT R 601-00000-37100 Water Sales o UB Receipt Serv 1 WATER 10-15-D3UT R 601-D0OOO-37100 Water Sales o US Receipt Serv Pen 30 101503ut R 601-00000-34400 Safe Drinking o UB Receipt Serv Pen 30 10-16-03UT R 601-00000-34400 Safe Drinking o US Receipt Serv 30 WATER 10-16-03UT R 601-00000-34400 Safe Drinking o UB Receipt Serv 1 WATER 10-16-Q3UT R 601-00000-37100 Water Sales o US Receipt Serv Pen 1 10-16-03UT R 601-00000-37100 Water Sales o US Receipt Serv 1 WATER 10-17-D3UT R 601-00000-37100 Water Sales o UB Receipt Serv Pen 1 10-17-D3UT R 601-00000-37100 Water Sales o US Receipt Serv Pen 30 10-17-D3UT R 601-00000-34400 Safe Drinking o US Receipt Serv 30 WATER 10-17-D3UT _ R 601-00000-34400 Safe Drinking o US Receipt Serv Pen 6 o UB Receipt Serv 6 SEWER o US Receipt Serv Pen a o US Receipt Serv 6 SewER o US Receipt Serv Pen 6 o US Receipt Serv a SEWER o UB Receipt Serv Pen 6 o US Receipt Serv 18 o UB Receipt Serv 6 SEWER o US Receipt Serv 18 o US Receipt Serv 6 SEWER 10-9003UT R 602-o0OOO-37200 Sewer Sales 10-9003UT R 602-00000-37200 Sewer Sales 1O-D9-D3UT R 602-o0OOO-37200 Sewer Sales 1O-D9-D3UT R 602-00000-37200 Sewer Sales 10-15-D3UT R 602-o0OOO-37200 Sewer Sales 101503UTADJ R 602-o0OOO-37200 Sewer Sales 10-15-D3UT-1 R 602-o0OOO-37200 Sewer Sales 101503UTADJ R 602-00000-37200 Sewer Sales 10-15-D3UT -1 R 602-o0OOO-37200 Sewer Sales 10-15-03UT R 602-00000-37200 Sewer Sales 1O-15-D3UT R 602-00000-37200 Sewer Sales Act $55.05 $809.22 $2.57 $223.89 $17.34 $13.32 $210.31 $4,080.39 10/15/2003 10/15/2003 10115/2003 10/16/2003 10116/2003 10/17/2003 10/17/2003 o UB Receipt Serv Pen 6 o UB Receipt Serv 6 SEWER o UB Receipt Serv Pen 18 o UB Receipt Serv 6 SEWER o UB Receipt Serv Pen 6 o UB Receipt Serv Pen 6 o UB Receipt Serv 6 SEWER 101503ut 101503ut 10-15-03UT 10-16-03UT 10-16-03UT 10-17-03UT 10-17-03UT R 602-00000-37200 Sewer Sales R 602-00000-37200 Sewer Sales R 602-00000-37200 Sewer Sales R 602-00000-37200 Sewer Sales R 602-00000-37200 Sewer Sales R 602-00000-37200 Sewer Sales R 602-00000-37200 Sewer Safes FUND $4,080.39 $27,654.53 , .Check Summary Register@ OCTOBER 2003 Name 10100 MAIN SlREET BANK Paid Chk# 018551 POSTMASTER Paid Chk# 018552 10,000 LAKES CHAPTER Paid Chk# 018553 BONESTROO, ROSENE, Paid Chk# 018554 BUILDING CODES & Paid Chk# 018555 CITY 'OF ST. PAUL Paid Chk# 018556 CORNER EXPRESS Paid Chk# 018557 CULLIGAN Paid Chk# 018558 GOPHER STATE ONE CALL INC Paid Chk# 018559 IIMC Paid Chk# 018560 IMAGE PRINTING & GRAPHICS Paid Chk# 018561 INTERNATIONAL UNION OF Paid Chk# 018562 LABORlMGMT HEALTH CARE Paid Chk# 018563 MCFOA Paid Chk# 018564 MENARDS - FOREST LAKE Paid Chk# 018565 METRO SALES INCORPORATED Paid Chk# 018566 MID AMERICA METER, INC. Paid Chk# 018567 MINNESOTA BENEFIT Paid Chk# 018568 NCPERS LIFE INSURANCE Paid Chk# 018569 PAULSETH, ELLEN Paid Chk# 018570 QWEST Paid Chk# 018571 SAM'S CLUB Paid Chk# 018572 THE MINNESOTA Paid Chk# 018573 TIME SAVER Check Date 10/15/2003 1012212003 10/2212003 1012212003 10/2212003 1012212003 1012212003 1012212003 1012212003 1012212003 1012212003 1012212003 1012212003 1012212003 1012212003 1012212003 1012212003 10/2212003 10/2212003 1012212003 10/2212003 10/2212003 1012212003 Total Checks Check Amt $450.56 UTIL1lY BILLING POSTAGE $175.00 P. PALZER-11-18 & 19 CONFEREN $13,623.06 MOUND TRAIL - SERV THRU 9-27-0 $35.00 2003 FALL BLDG CODE SEMINAR- $128.01 ASPHALT MIX $40.79 FUEL - SERV THRU SEPT 2003 $35.97 WATER RENTAL $15.50 SERVICES THRU SEPTEMBER $90.00 T. BENDER ANNUAL MEMBERSHIP FE $309.70 4 PART BLDG, MECH PERMITS & PE $60.00 T. PETERSON & J. MCPHERSON UNI $170.00 E. PAULSETH - HEALTH CARE SEMI $30.00 T. BENDER & K SWEENEY SEMINAR $27.64 SUPPLIES $95.58 STAPLES FOR COPIER $243.20 REPAIR, CLEAN, CALIBRATE 8" ME $78.01 E. PAULSETH NOV. INS. $32.00 NOV. 2003 INS. E PAULSETH & T $57.60 REIMBURSE FOR MILEAGE $113.00 612 E35-0084 - SERV THRU 10-31 $207.91 OFFICE SUPPLIES $20.00 K. MOORE SYKES - CONFERENCE $492.83 CllY COUNCIL - 9-24-03 $16,531.36 Check Register-Payroll 1 0-9-03 Pay Pay Check Sac Check Check Year Group Period # Employee # Employee Name Date Amount Gross 2003 01 21 007381 000000047 COOK, KENNETH 10/912003 $277.27 $1,367.50 2003 01 21 007382 000000026 PALZER, PAUL J. 10/9/2003 $1,949.95 $2,788.63 2003 01 21 007383 000000093 STEPHAN, KIM 10/912003 $868.86 $1,302.38 2003 01 21 007384 000000094 MOORE-SYKES, KIMBERLAI 10/9/2003 $1,646.51 $2,904.52 2003 01 21 007385 000000098 PAULSETH,ELLEN 10/912003 $1,373.97 $2,553.43 2003 01 21 007386 000000091 MCPHERSON, JOEL 10/912003 $1,070.99 $1,861.03' 2003 01 21 007387 000000075 PETERSON, TEDD 10/912003 $1,132.20 $2,071.15 2003 01 21 007388 000000069 BENDER, TERESA 10/9/2003 $997.49 $1,874.23 2003 01 21 007389 000000080 SWEENEY, KRISTEN 10/912003 $852.57 $1,495.67 2003 01 21 007390 000000073 BROUSSARD,LlNDA 10/912003 $0.00 $200.00 2003 01 21 007391 000000110 LEE, THOMAS A. 1019/2003 $184.70 $200.00 2003 01 21 007392 000000111 PAAR, JEFFREY S. 10/9/2003 $184.70 $200.00 2003 01 21 007393 000000068 SWEENEY, TERRY 10/9/2003 $227.58 $250.00 2003 01 21 007394 000000089 YELLE-CAPRA, MARY J. 10/9/2003 $147.69 $200.00 $10,914.48 $19,268.54 Centerville City Council Workshop Sedona Homes October 20th, 2003 AGENDA I. Introduction *ScottlPaul >> Review Development History >> Office/Condo Project >> Townhomes - Hugo (112 units), White Bear (20) II. Overview of the Project *140-150 Units *Schedule >> Public Improvements - 5/2004 >> Construction - 8/2004 >> Build-Out 3-4 years - 200712008 *Budget - Need for TIF (Soil Correction) *Landowner Discussions *Lay-Out and Models (Floor Plan) III. Overview of Office/C9ndo Project IV. Overview ofTIF Process *Use of Money *Redevelopment Qualifications *Review Maps (planning Map) *Financial Potential V. TIF Options ~ Add Downtown Redevelopment >> Redevelopment on adjacent Sites >> Other Public Improvements: Water Tower, Trail, Street Extension VI. Feedback and Discussion of Process PROPERTY ANALYSIS. CITY OF CENTERVlLLE , M8rIIet T_ Year REF PIN NUlllber RefereMe 0lImmIed Valuation Amount Bum - C 23-31-22-414lO7 BGL Partrlenlhbl no "40,200 $4,092.33 NA 2.80 Land $140,2110 D 23-31-22-41-ol108 center Oaks PartneIll no S84,300 $2,461.68 NA 1.70 Land $84,300 B 23-31-22-44-0007 DraInage orea no S48,GOO $140.03 NA 4.60 Land $46,lXlO H 23-31-22-14-0065 Rehbein, 8M & Gordon no S214,300 $3,061.99 NA 6.00 Land $214,300 To1aIs: ",768.83 14.00 REF PIN NUIIIber Reforence OCCUDIed ValuatIon Amount Bum 4_ A 23-31-22-44-0003 Carpenter yes t142,4lIO $1,691.28 1979 3.84 Land $60,600 BuDdIng $91,800 B 23-31-22-44-0002 Clvpenter yes "30,200 $3,880.41 1972 US Land $56,700 BuDdIng $73,600 . F001 23-31-22-41-00G2 Lake Area UIlI1ly COntIact yes 1380. 100 $12,631.05 1978 4.60 Land $178,100 BuDdIng $184,lXlO F-I 23-31-22-41-OllO3 Lake Area UIlI1ly COntIact yes S2lI8, 112 516,318.14 1978 Land $32,700 BulIdIng $127,700 G 23-31-22-44-0004 Reubln yes 1288,_ $9,884.80 1974 6.6 Land $120,800 BuDdIng $168,700 , 23-31-22-14-0068 Muellner Yes 1223.800 $3,660.67 1972 2.66 Land $72,000 BuIlding $161,900 J 23-31-22-44-000II FInlt CIess Leeslng Yes t7",800 $26,820.04 21101 2.03 Land $68,400 BulIdIng $925,600 K1 23-31-22-44-000II Rehbein Yes 1288,100 $10,872. tt 1975 US Land ",000 BuIlding 1241,000 L Ves 18.60 CIty PrGpmty CIIy 01 CenteIYiIIe yes Land 2.10 BuUdlng To1aIs: 12.432,212 S84,46UO 42.14 Redeveloprnent AnalysIs Total Occupied Parcels - by area Total Non - OccupIed Palce1s - by area Total Acreage OccupIed Area as B pel eel daQe of Total Acreage 42.14 ~ 56.14 75.07% ~"'I I""~ ,," :~ . ';.', ~' D.... (il' ~T 1 ' . " --,...~-- -- ft w ()'J . '"1 ~ \ )11 ; ~ . '. : - - --..... - . ~ .4f'<<"."'~III~~-- - --~ , . If,) . I:. . . .p.. p. i.....-J' ~ c:. 7S" A... COR~ LIMITS OF CITY OF r-r) . -"'" ",,.~ t:4~1tIIo - ~ EN "T!RVILLE- ~ ~ ,time: 10/16/2003 10:25 ~ No.:070 P.OO2 . City of Hugo 14669 Fitzgerald Avenue North Hugo, MN 55038-9367 PHONE: (651) 762-6300 FAX: (651) 426-8812 EMAIL: info@Ci.hugo.mn.us October 15, 2003 Fran Miron. Mayor Becky Petryk. Council Member Ward J Frank Puleo, Council Member Ward 2 Chuck HtJf1S, Council Member Ward 3 Mike Granger, Council Member at Large Paul Keleher Sedona Homes 4910 Highway 61 White Bear Lake, MN 55110 RE: Sedona Homes. Reference Dear Mr. Keleher: You requested a letter of reference regarding projects you completed in the City of Hugo. I understand that you intend to submit this letter to the City of Centerville as part of a development application. Sedona Homes has completed several developments in the CitY of Hugo. They have worked cooperatively with the City and have always respo~ded in a prompt fashion to any City request. They keep the City informed and updated on their development projects and have worked closely with the City and residents to resolve any problems. Their extra effort to meet with neighboring property owners and to respond to resident questions and concerns was much appreciated. Please feel free to forward this reference to the City of Centerville. If you or anyone from the City of Centerville would like additional information, please call me at (651) 762-6320. Sincerely, ~/ -;:::' ./ '~:..e:-~ 7' ..,. -- ~'. John Rask, AICP . Community Development Director I I I .x- I I I ~ I I I I I ~ I! I Jj( I rl I CiS I II I I I III~I I I I I I I I I I I ~ .... ---------- -------- t i &II !.. Ill' 0 "'0.... S . ~ 0...,- "'008 ~ ~J r: ~ 'i N 1:'1. it.. '+ ~ C!. ~ fi < !:l 'a i::&l,~~"i. U:l. B ... a =.....a.Sl.SlN € ii II ~fi. is ;.i~!~i~ .!I ;t'g Ill~ ~! ~~~it~&\ ~ !~ ~l '!~ 1~ ::;iR'::Jo~~ 0~ &OH~HH "....0 I I I I ~II 1&1 I" .11 III ~ II I I I I I ~ d o 0 ~"= _ u ~.s "= ~ ~o :: u II 1;11 II ! IIII ~ !J I '" I pi } 111,1' ~ I; :~ "I " I , 'I '~!i Ii I 'I .ri. ': ! 'i , ~ J j I' : i I i I , I ,I i I J ! I: I ,'I" I' r ';111'1 :i. !'~:~' ~i~~; ;:11 '.ll I' :.: '~ , . , j " , ' ~ " i i , I ,I II 'I I I 1 il I I " :! ,I, I, ,J t ; :l' d ' if .,I, I j:. :1,' .,lj,II, I I': ,J; l:l:ij J. ,I':', I ,I.. jl:, '" I ~I: ' " u" I ! f):! i l ':~ ~ !:~ I :1' ,~~'~i : r' II' ""~',: ': " , :'1 : I ,jl i I 'i" : ~ . ! n-:, 'f " ~ ,~ fr<t:'j , Il I m: I ' j :} I~lj :11 :\ I' " 1 , " " ,i I 'I I I : : I: :i ; n L 1 ' 1 ' I I 'I , .1 I j' :1 ' I i, P " I :i i , Protect BudGet - Worksheet I Property Acquisition Soli Corrections Demolition and Site Clean up Utilities and Roads Mitigation Credits " $2,350,000 $1,155,000 $200,000 $3,300,000 $250,000 ! Total $7,255,000 150 $48,367 140 $51,821 130 ~55,808 150 ($3,505,000) 140 ($3,755,000) 130 ($4,005,OO?) i 1 Cost per unit ., :j I, 'i TIF Required for $25,ooO/unit , I ' 1 1 ,I I I ' I II I,j , 'I t, I I: , , I ~ . r I. , I .. I ,- i : I I ' , , ! j : I ,'; ,: jl 1 i I Iii . I ' ,,' . Ii 1 i', :i f' 'j " ' :: [1 ~ l j ! rill i i, I I j I I I .. ~ f~ I i :\ I ~j ~ I I, I '[ I I 'j :I I amnmMLLII I -- TAIl_ -.gllrlelllpmonl 010 MIlLY8IlI 1IOT__ ...- I\\) - WC::ENT I I - __ _TAIl I CAPTURED TAX CAP PROJECT ADMIN EXCESS PAYGO PATAIIUI _GAPAllIn' GAPAllm' I TAX CAPACITY RATE PAYGO FEE WCREMENT NET P VALUE -- 2D01 0.00 0.00 0.00 142.8840% 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2D01 0.00 0.00 0.00 142.8840% 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2G02 0.00 0.00 0.00 142.8840% 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2lI02 0.00 0.00 0.00 142.8840% 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2003 35,000.00 35,000.00 0.00 142.88400/0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2003 35,000.00 35,000.00 0.00 142.8840% 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 21104 35.000.00 35.000.00 0.00 142.8840% 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 21104 35,000.00 35,000.00 0.00 142.8840% 0.00 O.OD 0.00 0.00 0.00 200S 35,000.00 35,000.00 0.00 142.8840% 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 200S 35,000.00 35,000.00 0.00 142.8840% 0.00 O.OD 0.00 0.00 0.00 2008 44,400.00 35.000.00 9,400.00 142.8840% 8,715.55 4,700.88 871.55 1,343.11 4,063.&8 2008 44,400.00 35,000.00 . 9,400.00 142.8840% 8,715.55 4,700.88 671.55 1,343.11 8,OlI8.2I 2007 111,000.00 35,000.00 78,000.00 142.8840% 54,295.82 38,007.14 5,429.59 10,859.18 39,2D2A8 2007 111,000.00 35,000.00 78,000.00 142.8840% 54,295.82 , 38,007.14 5,429.59 10,859.18 69,836.88 2008 222,000.00 35,000.00 187,000.00 142.88400/0 133,596.54 93,617.B8 13,359.65 28,719.31 142,891.68 2008 222,000.00 35.000.00 187,000.00 142.8840% 133,596.54 93,617.88 13,359.65 26,719.31 213,lI8&.&I 2008 333,000.00 35,000.00 298,000.00 142.8840% 212,897.18 148,028.01 21,289.12 42,579.43 324,778.28 2008 333,000.00 35,000.00 298,000.00 142.8840% 212,897.16 148,028.01 21,289.12 42,579.43 432,8B4.21 2010 333,000.00 35,000.00 298,000.00 142.88400/0 212,897.16 149,028.01 21,289.12 42,579.43 638,3&&.38 2010 333,000.00 35,000.00 298,000.00 142.8840% 212,897.16 149,028.01 21,289.12 42,579.43 641,264.09 2011 333,000.00 35,000.00 298,000.00 142.8840% 212,897.16 148,028.01 21,289.12 42,579.43 741,843.08 2011 333,000.00 35,000.00 298,000.00 142.8840% 212,897.16 149,028.01 21,289.12 42,579.43 839,883.&8 2012 333,000.00 35,000.00 298,000.00 142.8840% 212,897.16 148,028.01 21,289.72 42,579.43 936,131.23 2012 333,000.00 35,000.00 298,000.00 142.8840% 212,897.16 148,028.01 21,289.12 42,579.43 1,028,388.38 2013 333,000.00 35,000.00 298,000.00 142.8840% 212,897.16 148,028.01 21,289.12 42,579.43 1,111,303.8& 2013 333,000.00 35,000.00 298,000.00 142.8840% 212,897.16 148,028.01 21,289.12 42,579.43 1,2D8,033.08 2014 333,000.00 35,000.00 298,000.00 142.8840% 212,897.16 148,028.01 21,289.12 42,579.43 1,294,&18.11. 2014 333,000.00 35,000.00 298,000.00 142.8840% 212,897.16 1.48,028.01 21,289.12 42,579.43 1,371,061.96 2016 333,000.00 35,000.00 298,000.00 142.8840% 212,897.16 148,028.01 21,289.12 42,579.43 1,481 ,44&.87 2016 333,000.00 35,000.00 298,000.00 142.8840% 212,897.16 149,028.01 21,289.12 42,579.43 1,641,830.18 2018 333,000.00 35,000.00 298,000.00 142.8840% 212,897.16 148,028.01 21,289.12 42,579.43 1,620,2&3.89 2018 333,000.00 35,000.00 298,000.00 142.8840% 212,897.16 149,028.01 21,289.12 42,579.43 1,698,764.83 2017 333,000.00 35,000.00 298,000.00 142.8840% 212,897.16 148,028.01 21,289.72 42,579.43 1,771,4D1.. 2017 333,000.00 35,000.00 298,000.00 142.8840% 212,897.16 148,028.01 21,289.12 42,579.43 1,844,233.87 2018 333,000.00 35,000.00 298,000.00 142.8840% 212,897.16 149,028.01 21,289.12 42,579.43 1,816,281.88 2018 333,000.00 35,000.00 298,000.00 142.8840% 212,897.16 149,028.01 21,289.12 42,579.43 1,184,&17.02 2018 333,000.00 35,000.00 298,000.00 142.8840% 212,897.16 148,028.01 21,289.12 42,579.43 2,062,221.64 201. 333,000.00 35,000.00 218,000.00 142.8840% 212,897.16 148,028.01 21,289.12 42,579.43 2,118,1118.88 2020 333,000.00 35,000.00 298,000.00 142.8840% 212,897.16 148,028.01 21,289.12 42,579.43 2,182,&82.88 2020 333,0Q0.00 35,000.00 298,000.00 142.8840% 212,897.16 148,028.01 21,289.12 42,579.43 2,246,388.77 2021 333,000.00 35,000.00 298,000.00 142.8840% 212,897.16 148,028.01 21,289.12 42,579.43 2,308.123.28 2021 333,000.00 35,000.00 298,000.00 142.8840% 212,897.16 148,028.01 21,289.12 42,579.43 2,398,393.48 2022 333,000.00 35,000.00 298,000.00 142.8840% 212,897.16 148,028.01 21,289.12 42,579.43 2,424,70&.89 2022 333,000.00 35,000.00 298,000.00 142.8840% 212,897.16 148,028.01 21,289.12 42,579.43 2,481,6118.06 2023 333,000.00 35,000.00 218,000.00 142.8840% 212,897.16 148,028.01 21,289.12 42,579.43 2,637,D98.. 2023 333,000.00 35,000.00 218,000.00 142.8840% 212,897.16 149,028.01 21,289.12 42,579.43 2,611,247.62 2024 333,000.00 35,000.00 298,000.00 142.8840% 212,897.16 148,028.01 21,289.12 42,579.43 2,644,076.89 2024 333,000.00 35,000.00 298,000.00 142.8840% 212,897.16 148,028.01 21,289.12 42,579.43 2,61&,816.37 2026 333,000.00 35.000.00 298,000.00 142J!.!1!1O% 212,897.16 148,028.01 21,289.12 42,579.43 2,748,897.88 2026 333,000.00 35,000.00 298,000.00 142.8840% 212,897.16 148,028.01 21,289.12 42,579.43 2,794,1&4.11 2028 333,000.00 35,000.00 298,000.00 142.8840% 212,897.16 148,028.01 21,289.12 42,579.43 2,642,813.90 2028 333,000.00 35,000.00 218,000.00 142.8840% 212,897.16 148,028.01 21,289.12 42,579.43 2,888,6D8.3O 2027 333,000.00 35,000.00 218,000.00 142.8840% 212,897.16 148,028.01 21,289.12 42,579.43 2,131,061.87 2027 333,000.00 35,000.00 218,000.00 142.81140% 212,897.16 148,028.01 21,289.72 42,579.43 2,17I,1D2.37 ......... FrALS 8,471,308.10 6,93&,616.87 847,130.81 1,61&,881.62 2,871,6D2.37 CENIEIMLLII I -- -- -1lenkIpaN 1\010 -'\'llIll 18__ 1IP1lIlIlIllCT - \'11M - -- FISCAL CAPTURED TAX CAP NET ~ ADMIN EXCESS PAYGO PA'IllIIIJl _CAPllCIIY CAPllCIIY DISPARITIES TAX CAPACITY RATE INCREMENT PAYGO FEE INCREMENT NET P VALUE 21101 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 142.8840% 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 21101 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 142.8840% 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2lI02 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 142.8840% 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2lI02 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 142.8840% 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2lI03 5,000.00 5,000.00 0.00 0.00 142.8840% 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2lI03 6,000.00 5,000.00 0.00 0.00 142.8840% 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2004 6,000.00 5,000.00 0.00 0.00 142.8840% 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2lIlI4 5,000.00 5,000.00 0.00 0.00 142.8840% 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 200ll 6,000.00 5,000.00 0.00 0.00 142.8840% 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 200lI 6,000.00 6,000.00 0.00 0.00 142.8840% 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2OD8 18,000.00 5,000.00 0.00 13,000.00 142.8840% 9,287.46 8,601.22 928.75 1,857.49 1,801.. 2OD8 18,000.00 5,000.00 0.00 13,000.00 142.8840% 9,287.46 8,601.22 928.75 1,857.49 11,07&.24 2llO7 38,000.00 5,000.00 0.00 31,000.00 142.8840% 22,147.02 18,&02.81 2,214.70 4,429.40 23,788.20 2llO7 38,000.00 5,000.00 0.00 31,000.00 142.8840% 22,147.02 11,1102.81 2,214.70 4,429.40 38,212.82 2OD8 50,400.00 5,000.00 0.00 45,400.00 142.8840% 32,434.67 22,704.27 3,243.47 6,486.93 63,848.38 2OD8 50,400.00 5,000.00 0.00 45,400.00 142.8840% 32,434.67 22,704.27 3,243.47 6,486.93 t1,2&3.30 2CI09 84,800.00 5,000.00 0.00 59,800.00 142.8840% 42,722.32 28,806.82 4,272.23 8,544.46 93,481.80 2CI09 84,8OD.OO 5,000.00 0.00 59,800.00 142.8840% 42,722.32 28,806.82 4,272.23 8,544.46 11&, 1l13.Sll 2010 84,800.00 5,000.00 0.00 59,800.00 142.8840% 42,722.32 28,80&.82 4,272.23 8,544.46 138,348.87 2010 84,800.00 5,000.00 0.00 59,800.00 142.8840% 42,722.32 28,80&.82 4,272.23 8,544.46 1&8,187.77 2011 84,800.00 5,000.00 0.00 59,800.00 142.8840% 42,722.32 29,80&.82 4,272.23 8,544.46 177,142.84 2011 84,800.00 5,000.00 0.00 59,800.00 142.8840% 42,722.32 28,80&.82 4,272.23 8,544.46 188,788.77 2012 84,800.00 5,000.00 0.00 59,800.00 142.8840% 42,722.32 28,90&.82 4,272.23 8,644.46 211,871.23 2012 84.800.00 5,000.00 0.00 59,800.00 142.8840% 42,722.32 28,80&.82 4,272.23 8,544.46 234,878.03 2018 84,800.00 5,000.00 0.00 59,800.00 142.8840% 42,722.32 28,80&.82 4,272.23 8,644.46 212,828.68 2013 84,800.00 5,000.00 0.00 59,800.00 142.8840% 42,722.32 28,90&.82 4,272.23 8,544.46 270,733.l18 2014 84,800.00 5,000.00 0.00 59,800.00 142.8840% 42,722.32 28,90&.82 4,272.23 8,544.46 288,10&.07 2014 84,800.00 5,000.00 0.00 59,800.00 142.8840% 42,722.32 28,80&.82 4,272.23 8,544.46 30&,0&2.81 20111 84,800.00 5,000.00 0.00 59,800.00 142.8840% 42,722.32 28,90&.82 4,272.23 8,644.46 321,&88.&8 20111 84,800.00 5,000.00 0.00 59,800.00 142.8840% 42,722.32 28,80&.82 4,272.23 8,544.46 337,717.40 2018 84,800.00 5,000.00 0.00 59,800.00 1428840% 42,722.32 28,80&.82 4,272.23 8,544.46 363,4&4.78 2018 84,800.00 5,000.00 0.00 59,800.00 142.8840% 42,722.32 28,80&.82 4,272.23 8,544.46 368,808.31 2017 84,800.00 5,000.00 0.00 59,800.00 142.8840% 42,722.32 28,80&.82 4,272.23 8,644.46 383,'IffT.37 2017 84,800.00 5,000.00 0.00 59,800.00 142.8840% 42,722.32 28,80&.82 4,272.23 8,544.46 388,401.09 2018 84,8OD.OO 6,000.00 0.00 59,800.00 142.8840% 42,722.32 28,80&.82 4,272.23 8,544.46 412,868.38 2018 84,800.00 5,000.00 0.00 59,800.00 142.8840% 42,722.32 28,80&.82 4,272.23 8,544.46 428,&87.83 2019 84,800.00 5,000.00 0.00 59,800.00 142.8840% 42,722.32 28,80&.82 4,272.23 8,644.46 440,138.22 2019 84,800.00 5,000.00 0.00 59.800.00 142.8840% 42,722.32 28,80&.82 4,272.23 8,544.46 463,377.&2 2020 ' 84,800.00 6,000.00 0.00 59,800.00 142.8840% 42,722.32 28,80&.82 4,272.23 8,644.46 488,283.82 2020 84,8OD.OO 5,000.00 0.00 59,800.00 142.8840% 42,722.32 29,80&.82 4,272.23 8,544.46 478,89&.28 2021 84,800.00 5,000.00 0.00 59,800.00 142.8840% 42,722.32 28,80&.82 4,272.23 8,544.46 481,1..30 2021 84,8OD.00 5,000.00 0.00 59,800.00 142.8840% 42,722.32 28,80&.82 4,272.23 8,644.46 &03,183.48 2022 84,800.00 5,000.00 0.00 59,800.00 142.8840% 42,722.32 28,80&.82 4,272.23 8,544.46 114,88&.08 2022 84,800.00 . 5,000.00 0.00 59,800.00 142.8840% 42,722.32 29,80&.82 4,272.23 8,544.46 828,301.29 2028 84,800.00 5,000.00 0.00 59,800.00 142.8840% 42,722.32 28,90&.82 4,272.23 8,544.46 137,438.09 2028 84,800.00 5,000.00 0.00 59,800.00 142.8840% 42,722.32 28,80&.82 4,272.23 8,544.46 648,30&.17 2024 84,800.00 5,000.00 0.00 59,800.00 142.8840% 42,722.32 28,80&.82 4,272.23 8,544.46 &18,808.28 2024 84,800.00 8,000.00 0.00 59,800.00 142.8840% 42,722.32 28,80&.82 4,272.23 8,544.46 188,248.78 2028 84,800.00 5,000.00 0.00 59,800.00 142.8840% 42,722.32 28,80&.82 4,272.23 8,544.46 678,338.08 2028 84,800.00 5,000.00 0.00 59,800.00 142.8840% 42,722.32 28,80&.82 4,272.23 8,544.46 &88,183.22 2028 84,800.00 5,000.00 0.00 59,800.00 142.8840% 42,722.32 28,80&.82 4,272.23 8,544.46 &88,'IffT .29 2028 84,800.00 5,000.00 0.00 59,800.00 142.8840% 42,722.32 28,80&.82 4,272.23 8,544.46 808,167.11 2027 84,800.00 6,000.00 0.00 59,800.00 142.8840% 42,722.32 28,soa.82 4,272.23 8,544.46 817,2118.38 2027 84,800.00 5,000.00 0.00 59,BOO.OO 142.8840% 42,722.32 28,80&.82 4,272.23 8,544.46 828,218.72 =-- 'OTALS 1,761,188.30 . 1,221,830.41 178,118.83 3&0,237.28 828.218.72 .... f i ~i l:! III' 0""0..... _ I::!~ 0\"'- ""llCl!5 :h ~1 ~ '" i ~j ~ ..,'i ~ g;' i] ~ ~ f::!, ] ./j_ll<c"" aL ~"lI. - a1 B~!:! i ]:.';..,iC, ~ -5' ~ a i.io~=af::!, ]~ ~ l ~I :; e f::!,.~E!;l~ Q.' ]!l Q. -I 1!'5il.......~.. rn~ s"~. =~ g-.~~DQg~ !~ 2l !~ j] g.~g~~.DQ;; o .. -l~uf. , ~ $ i:) lu:I!!! i I I c! I I d I ;f I I I I , I ~ . I liC I rl I I I II~ I I IIII I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ~II 151 1-1 sll III c! It I I I I I - :s . o c ~.g _ u ~E .::l :g :iB - - "t:l 0 ta C ta~ _ 0 C1._ . QIl ta .13 e ..;8: ~-a~ o .;g .a z ~.:! II' Idl II !I~l 4 ! ':....1... ...... .. ...... '.. , \ r ~h'. ~;',';1~ . e =Z =.~ .- ~ e IJ' C ..~G.}. 'Ct = = ...~ 0';: . = <>>G.} lu ~ o ( 0 o L- _ hl fll t:J 7 L- 8~D 00 iY JY1 f1D ~-I--1-- I-----r~', __J::~-' --- n---nn---n \-.... ( ~_:::.., ~~ I II o " I _ _ _ l r=.,_:Jr-rl @ I ... I L:Io/=r~ l?- I :: ' \V I Iil I II ~ · ~) 6--1-- --P' --\"---~-; - 115HEIJ m__ l/ LA:r \j D '/ I ~ L ;=f\ I ~~ ~ ~ ~ -~ 10 0 (~ a ~ ..':::: Q o ~- I ? v ~ _____ ir'-.. :~ II \ I \ . ... e e -'I ~ ..... ~ .= ~ r I t i :;i I I .' I ~ ------~ ~ -------, .: I I ~\ I : .: .---- I I 1 I I I in I I 1 I I L . , , } I .( ^" ~ z c ... e .s ~ "C = e u ~ rIJ. -, I 1 1 1 I I -I I 1 1 I I _____..J I I I I 1 I I I I 1 I f- I I I I I I I I I I I --, I I I 1 I I I I I 1 I I I I 1 1 I I : 1 I : I------...J I I I 1 1 I I I I I I I I October 17, 2003 Honorable Mayor and City Council Members, I would like to request City Council's consideration in granting Cemstone an overweight permit to exceed the posted tonnage for Sorel Street and Goiffon Roads for four (4) trucks at seven (7) tons each. Sorel Street and Goiffon Road are currently posted as five (5) ton roads. If Sorel Street is not a possibility, would you consider granting the overweight permit for Heritage Street instead of Sorel Street. This is to . haul in cement for a garage slab. Thank you in advance for your consideration. J!~~~ David Kapaun 7067 Goiffon Road Centerville, MN 55038 STAFF REPORT CENTERVILLE CITY COUNCIL Date: October 22, 2003 To: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members Ms. Kim Moore-Sykes, City Administrator cof From: Ellen Paulseth, Finance Director Re: Purchase of new copy machine ************************************************************************ Staffhas been trying out new copy machines in an effort to find the most suitable replacement for the current machine, which is three years old. We have agreed on the Ricoh Aficio 2045 Digital Copier from Metro Sales (see attached quote.) The proposed new machine comes with a hole-punch kit, produces more copies per minute, has faxing capabilities, and has network print/scan capabilities. Staffhas included the purchase of a new copier in the draft Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) for the year 2003 (see attached page.) Council will be reviewing and approving a 5-year CIP at the time the 2004 budget is adopted. However, there should be adequate funding in the capital outlay account to purchase the copier this year. We wo~d be purchasing the machine through the State of Minnesota Cooperative Purchasing Venture (CPV) Program to ensure the best possible price and to be in compliance with legal bidding requirements. Because of the newer digital technology, the maintenance contract for the new machine would be $102/month less than the contract on the current machine. The dedicated line for the fax machine could be eliminated, as the new machine would allow for network faxing capabilities. The current copy machine and fax machine could both be moved to the Public Works Department to upgrade the equipment currently in place there. If approved, Council should motion to approve the purchase of a Ricoh Aficio 2045 Digital copier from Metro Sales, in the amount of$12,666, plus tax, through the State of Minnesota Cooperative Purchasing Venture Program. . me t'Sales. Inc.. ,;, IS largest RlCOh dealer SOLUTION FOR: Centerville Village Hall 1880 Main St Centervllle, MN 55038 September 12, 2003 RlCOH AFICIO 2045 DIGITAL COPIER Q 45 Digital B&W Copies/Prints Per Minute Q Automatic Document Feeder Q Automatic Duplex Q Bypass feed Q PS530 Paper Bank Q SR880 Rnlsher/Stapler Q 2 & 3 Hole Punch KIt Your Investment: $10,175 Optional Accessories: FAX OPTION: NETWORK PRINT SCAN KIT: $920 $1,571 (J (p j\-re.f (p ~. , ;}.~fd--' q ~<(1IV ,.'1) 1 MAINTENANCE AND SUPPLY CONTRACf - based on 11,000 per month MONTHLY INVESTMENT = $152 Overages billed at .0139 CJ Indudes all service, parts, labor, travel, maintenance and deanlng CJ Indudes all Toner, Developer, POJ's CJ 7 Year Replacement Warranty CJ 0-3 Hour Sentlce Guarantee . Capital Plan City of Centervi11e, MN Project # 03-ADM-007 Project Name. Copy Mac~e Replacement 2003 thru 2007 Type Useful Life Category Equipment 3 Years Office Equipment Priority Contact Department 3 Important Kim Moore-Sykes Administration Total Project Cost $14,000 Description Current copy machine is three years old. Metro Sales is recommending a Ricoh Aficio 2045 Digital copier with 45 digital B&W copies per minute, automatic document feed, automatic duplex, bypass feed, PS530 paper bank, SR880 finisher/stapler, 2 & 3 hole punch kit, internal fax, network print scan kit Justification The current copy machine speed is only 32 ccpies per minute and it does not have the punch hole kit, fax option, or network print scan kit. The fax option would allow staff to use the copy machine as a fax machine and fax documents right from the workstation. In addition, the network print scan kit would allow documents to be sent to the printer from imy workstation for 1ater assembly. For example, council packets could be stored in electronic format until they are ready to be assembled. Packets could easily be produced all at once, and the machine would do all the collating and punching. Packet production is very labor intensive. Also, because of the new digital technology, maintenance charges would be approximately $ I02lmonth less with the new maChine. Expenditures EquipNehfcleslFumishlngs Total 2003 14,000 14,000 2004 2005 2006 2007 Total 14,000 14,000 Funding Sources General Fund 2003 14,000 14,000 2004 2005 2006 2007 Total 14.000 14,000 Total I~~ Produced using the Plan-It Capital Planning Software Page 3 of 4 Thursday, October 02, 2003 STAFF REPORT CENTERVILLE CITY COUNCIL Date: October 22, 2003 To: Honorable Mayor and City Councll Members Ms. Kim Moore-Sykes, City Administrator Ef From: Ellen PauIseth, Finance Director Re: Purchase of folding machine ************************************************************************ Staffis again requesting to purchase a folding machine to assist with all of the City's mass mailing needs. Staffhas included the purchase of a folding machine in the draft Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) for the year 2004 (see attached page.) Council will be reviewing and - approving a 5-year CIP at the time the 2004 budget is adopted. However, there should be adequate funding in the capital outlay account to purchase the machine this year. The folding machine that staff is proposing would also have stuffing and sealing capabilities. Currently labor costs for these activities are estimated to be $2,560 per year. At this rate, the machine would pay for itself in three years. It has been suggested that the committees or other non-profit organizations may wish to assist with the purchase, or be willing to pay a fee for the use of !he machine. Capital Plan City of Centerville, MN 2003 thru 2007 Type Useful Life Category Equipment 7 years Office Equipment Priority Contact Department 3 Important Kim Moore-Sykes Administration Total Project Cost $7,500 Project # 03-ADM-002 Project Name Folding Mac~e Description I Folding machine that would fold, stuff, and seal utility bills and other mass-mailed documents. Justification I Currently, labor costs are estimated to be $640 per quarter, or $2,560 per year for folding and stuffing activities. A less expensive model that would fold only could be obtained for 'under $2,000, however, it would not have stuffing or sealing capabilities. Expenditures EqulpNehlcleslFumishlngs 2003 7,500 7,500 2004 2005 2006 2007 Total 7,500 7,500 Total Funding Sources General Fund 2003 7,500 7,500 2004 2005 2006 2007 Total 7,500 7,500 Total I Opemtiona\ "'-"Other PossIble mamtenance agreement Produced using the Plan-It Capital Planning Software Wednesday, October /5, 2003 ervi{{e 'Esta6[islid 1857 1880 !Main Street . CenteroiffeJ!M9{. 55038 (651) 429-3232 . !fa(( (651) 429-8629 STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF ANOKA CITY OF CENTERVILLE RESOLUTION #03 - 055 A RESOLUTION DECLARING COSTS TO BE ASSESSED AND OlIDERlNG PREPARATION OF PROPOSED ASSESSMENT FOR MUNICPAL SERVICES WIT.H.lN THE PHEASANT MARSH n DEVELOPMENT AND CALLING FOR PUBLIC BEAlUNG WHEREAS, a contract was ente.red into for the improvements of municipal services (roads, curb/gutter, water and sewer and street lighting) within the Pheasant Marsh Phase IT Development and the contract (bid) price for such improvement is $463,327.45 and the total cost of the improvements will be $625,880.00 and are proposed to be assessed to the Pheasant Marsh Phase IT development (27) parcels. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCll. OF THE CITY OF CENTERVILLE, MINNESOTA: 1. The portion of the costs to be assessed against benefited property owners is declared to be $625,880.00. 2. Assessments shall be payable in equal annual installments extending over a period of ten (10) years, the first of the installments to be payable on or before the first Monday in January, 2004 and shall bear interest at the rate of eight (8) percent per annum from the date of the adoption of the assessment resolution. . 3. The City Clerk, with the assistance of the City Engineer and the Finance Director, shall forthwith calculate the proper amount to be specially assessed for such improvement against every assessable lot, piece or parcel of land within the district affected, without regard to cash valuation, as provided by law, and she shall file a copy of su~h proposed assessment in her office for public inspection. 4. The Clerk shall upon completion of such proposed assessment, notify the council thereof 5. The owner of any property so assessed may, at any time prior to certification of the assessment to the county auditor, pay the whole of the assessment of such property, with interest accrued to the date of payment, to the City Clerk, except that no interest shall be charged if the eIitire assessment is paid within 30 days :from the adoption of the assessment. He may at any time thereafter, pay to the City Clerk the entire amount of the assessment remElining unpaid, with interest accrued to December 31 of the year in which such payment is made. Such payment must be made before November 15 or interest will be charged through December 31 of the succeeding year. 6. A he8rlngshall be held on tIre 12th day of November, 2003 in the City Hall at 1880 Main Street commencing at 6:30 p.m. or. shortly thereafter to pass upon such proposed assessment and at ~ch time and place all persons owning property affected by such improvement will be given an opportunity to be heard with reference to such assessment. 7. The City Clerk is hereby directed to cause a notice of the hearing on the proposed . assessment to be published once in the official newspaper at least two (2) weeks prior to the hearing, and she sMll state in the notice the total cost of the improvement. She shall also cause mailed notice to be given to the owner of each parcel described in the assessment roll not less than two (2) weeks prior to the hearings. 8. The owner of any property so assessed may, at any time prior to certification of the assessment to the County Auditor, pay the whole of the assessment on such property, with interest accrued to the date of payment, to the City Clerk, except 1Mt no interest shall be charged if the entire assessment is paid within thirty (30) days from the adoption of the assessment. He/She may at any time thereafter, pay to the City Clerk the entire amount of the assessment remSlining unpaid, with interest accrued to December 31 of the . year in which such payment is made. Such payment must be made before November 15 or interest will be charged through December 31 of the suc~ing year. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City of Centerville this 22nd day of October, 2003. Mayor, Terry Sweeney Attest: City Clerk, Teresa Bender ervi{{e 'Esta6fisfied 1857 1880 Main Street 8 Centervif{e/ 9vftJ.L 55038 (651) 429-3232 .:Fat( (651) 429-8629 STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF ANOKA CITY OF CENTERVILLE RESOLUTION #03 - 056 A RESOLUTION DECLARING COSTS TO BE ASSESSED AND ORDERING PREPARATION OF PROPOSED ASSESSMENT FOR MUNICPAL SERVICES WIT.H.lN THE PELTIER PRESERVE DEVELOPMENT AND BENEFITED PROPERTIES OUTSIDE OF THE DEVELOPMENT ALONG CENTERVlLLE ROAD~ MILL ROAD~-PELTIER CIRCLE-& PELTIER LAKE DRIVE AND '. CALLING FOR PUBLIC HEARING WHEREAS, a contract was entered into for the improvements of municipal services (roads, curb/gutter, water and sewer and street lighting) within the Peltier Preserve Development arid municipal water services to the above stated benefited properties outside of the development and the contract (bid) price for such improvement is $461,220.00 and the total cost of the improvements will be $574,746.25. A total of $475,4IO.250f the assessments are proposed to be assessed to the Peltier Preserve Development (20) parcels and $99,336.0000 the benefiting properties outside of the development (24) parcels. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CENTERVILLE, MINNESOTA: 1. The portion of the costs to be assessed against benefited property owners is declared to be $574,746.25 ($475,410.25 within the Peltier Preserve Development and $99,336.00 outside of the development). 2. Assessments shall be payable in equal annual installments extending over a period of ten (10) years, the first of the installments to be payable on or before the first Monday in January, 2004 and shall bear interest at the rate of eight (8) percent per annum from the date of the adoption of the assessment resolution. 3. The City Clerk, with the assistance of the City Engineer and the Finance Director, shall forthwith calculate the proper amount to be specially assessed for such improvement against every assessable lot, piece or parcel of land within the district affected, without regard to cash valuation, as provided by law, and she shall file a copy of such proposed assessment in her office for public inspection. 4. The Clerk shall upon completion of such proposed assessment, notify the council thereof. 5. The owner of any property so assessed may, at any time prior to certification of the assessment to the county auditor, pay the whole of the assessment of such property, with interest accrued to the date of payment, to the City Clerk, except that no interest shall be charged if the entire assessment is paid within 30 days from the adoption of the assessment. He may at any time thereafter, pay to the City Clerk the entire amount of the assessment remaining unpaid, with interest accrued to December 31 of the year in which such payment is made. Such payment must be made before November 15 or interest will be charged through December 31 of the succeeding year. 6. A hearing shall be held on the 12th day of November, 2003 in the City Hall at 1880 Main Street commencing at 6:30 p.rn. or shortly thereafter to pass upon such proposed assessment and at such time and place all persons owning property affected by such improvement will be given an opportunity to be heard with reference to such assessment. 7. The City Clerk is hereby directed to cause a notice of the hearing on the proposed assessment to be published once in the official newspaper at least two (2) weeks prior to the hearing, and she shall state in the notice the total cost of the improvement. She shall also cause mailed notice to be given to the owner of each parcel described in the assessment roll not less than two (2) weeks prior to the hearings. 8. The owner of any property so assessed may, at any time prior to ~cation of the assessment to the County Auditor, pay the whole of the ~sessment on such property, with interest accrued to the date of payment, to the City Clerk:, except that no interest shall be charged if the entrre- assessment is paid within thirty (30) days from the adoption of the assessment. He/She may at any time thereafter, pay to the City Clerk the entire amount of the assessment remaining unpaid, with interest accrued to December 31 of the . year in which such payment is made. Such payment must be made before November 15 or interest will be charged througll December 31 of the succeeding year. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City of Centerville this 22nd day of October, 2003. Mayor, Terry Sweeney Attest: City Clerk, Teresa Bender ervi{{e 'Esta6lisfiei 1857 1880 Main Street _ Centervilfe, 9vffAL 55038 (651) 429-3232 e1"a;c (651) 429-8629 STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF ANOKA CITY OF CENTERVILLE RESOLUTION #03 - 057 A RESOLUTION DECLARING COSTS TO BE ASSESSED AND ORDERING PREPARATION OF PROPOSED ASSESSMENT FOR STREET IMPROVEMENTS MADE TO 902' OF MOUND TRAIL (pORTION OF SAID ROAD IS WITHIN THE BUECHLER ESTATES DEVELOPMENT AND A PORTION OF SAID ROAD IS OUTSIDE OF THE DEVELOPMENT (7185 & 7193 MOUND TRAIL ARE TIiE BENEFITING PROPERTIES) AND CALLING FOR PUBLIC HEARING WHEREAS, a contract was entered into for the street improvement made to 902' of Mound Trail and the above stated benefited properties outside of the development and th~ contract (bid) price for such improvement is $68,995.00 and the total cost of the improvements will be $79,345.00. A total of $54,212.00 will be the responsibility of the City of Centerville, $22,825.00 will be the responsibility of Mr. Carl Buechler and the remainder $2,308.00 is proposed to be assessed to 7185 & 7193 Mound Trail (benefited properties). THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNcn. OF THE CITY OF CENTERVILLE, MINNESOTA: 1. The portion of the costs to be assessed against benefited property owners is declared to be $2,308.00 (7185 & 7193 Mound Trail). 2. Mr. Buechler has entered into an agreement with the City of Centerville and is responsible for $22,825.00 associated with the Buechler Estates development street construction. . 3. Assessments shall be payable in equal annual installments extending over a period of ten (10) years, the first of the installments to be payable on or before the first Monday in January, 2004 and shall bear interest at the rate of eight (8) percent per annum from the date of the adoption of the assessment resolution. 4. The City Clerk, with the assistance of the City Engineer and the Finance Director, shall forthwith calculate the proper amount to be-specially assessed for such improvement against every assessable lot, piece or parcel of land within the district affected, without regard to cash valuation, as provided by law, and she shall file a copy of such proposed assessment in her office for public inspection. 5. The Clerk shall upon completion of such proposed assessment, notify the council thereof. 6. The owner of any property so assessed may, at any time prior to certification of the assessment to the county auditor, pay the whole of the assessment of such property, with interest accrued to the date of payment, to.the City Clerk, except that no interest shall.be charged if the entire assessment is paid within 30 days from the adoption of the assessment. He may at any time thereafter, pay to the City Clerk the entire amount of the assessment remaining unpaid, with interest accrued to December 31 of the year in which such payment is made. Such payment must be made before November 15 or interest will be charged through December 31 of the succeeding year. 7. A hearing shall be held on the 12th day of November, 2003 in the City Hall at 188.0 Main Street commencing at 6:30 p:-m. or shortly thereafter to pass upon such proposed assessment and at such time and place all persons owning property affected by such improvement will be given an opportunity to be heard with reference to such assessment. 8. The City Clerk is hereby directed to cause a notice of the hearing on the proposed . assessment to be published once in the official newspaper at least two (2) weeks prior to the hearing, and she shall state in the notice the total cost of the improvement. She shall also cause mailed notice to be given to the owner of each parcel described in the assessment roll not less than two (2) weeks prior to the hearings. 9. The owner of any property so "assessed may, at any time prior to certification of the assessment to the County Auditor, pay the whole of the assessment on such property, with interest accrued to the date of payment, to the City Clerk, except that no interest Shall be charged if the entire assessment is paid within thirty (30) days from the adoption of the assessment. He/She may at any time thereafter, pay to the City Clerk the entire amount of the assessment remaining unpaid, with interest accrued to December 31 of the year in which such payment is made. Such payment must be made before November 15 or interest will be charged through December 31 of the succeeding year. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City ofCenterville this 22nd day of October, 2003. Mayor, Terry Sweeney Attest: City Clerk, Teresa Bender .- Effective 1/10190 City of CenterviDe Ord. #49 STATE OF MINNEsOTA COUNTY OF ANOKA CITY OF CENTERVllLE ORDINANCE #49 AN ORDINANCE RELATING TO NOISE, PROVIDING FOR THE ELIMINATION AND PREvENTION OF PROHIBITED NOISE, AND IMPOSING PENALTIES FOR VIOLATION. THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CENTERVILLE DoES ORDAIN: SECTION 1. NOISES PROHIBITED. The City Council finds that within the City, certain loud, avoidable, unnatural and unnecessary noises, which under certain circumstances and conditions constitute a serious threat to the health, welfare, contentment and the feeling of well-being of our residents. Excessive noise degrades the environment of the City and the City has a substantial and, in some situations, compelling interest in controlling such noise. Subdivision 1. General Prohibition. No person shall make or cause to be made any distinctly audIble, continuous, objectionable noise due to intermittence, frequency, beat, shrillness, or intensity that annoys, disturbs, injures, or endangers the comfort, repose, health, peace, safety, or welfare of any person or precludes their enjoyment of property. This geneml prohIbition is not limited by the specific restriction of the following subdivisions. Subdivision 2. Radios. Phon02raDhs. PaPiolJ Svstems. Etc. No person shall use or operate or permit the use or operation of any mdio receiving set, musical instrument, phonograph, paging system, machine, or other device for the production or reproduction of sound in violation of the noise standards set forth in Section 3, Subdivision 1. Subdivision 3. Particioation in Noisv Parties or GatheriolJ- No person shall participate in any party or other gathering of people in violation of Section 1, subdivision 1. When a police officer determines that a gathering is creating such a violation, the Effective 1/10190 City ofCenterviDe Ord. #49 officer may order all persons present, other than the owner or tenant of the premises, to disperse immediately. Subdivision 4. Animals. a. Refer to Ordinance #24, Section 24.08 - Nuisances. SECTION 2. HOURLY RESTRICTION ON CERTAIN OPERATIONS Subdivision 1. Reereadonal Vehicles. No person shall, between the hours of 10:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m., drive or operate any mini-bike/dirt bike, snowmobile, or any other recreational vehicle not licensed for travel on public highways. Subdivision 2. Domesdc Power EaWoment. No person shall operate a power lawn mower, hedge clipper, chain saw, mulcher, garden tiller, edger, drill, or other similar domestic power maintenance equipment between the hours of 10:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.rn.. Snow removal equipment is exempt from this provision. Subdivision 3. Refuse Haulin2. No person shall collect or remove garbage or refuse in any residential district between the hours of 10:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. Subdivision 4. Construcdon ActMties. No person shall engage in or permit construction activities involving the use of hammers or the use of any kind of ~ electric, diesel, or gas powered machine or other power equipment between the hours of 10:00 p.rn.. and 7:00 a.rn.. Subdivision 5. Noise Impact Statements. The Council may require any person applying for a change in zoning classification or a permit or license for any structure, operation, process, installation or alteration, or project that may be considered a potential noise source to submit a noise impact statement It shall evaluate each such statement and take its evaluation into account in approving or disapproving the license or permit applied for or the zoning change requested. Effective 1/10/90 City ofCenterville Ord. #49 SECTION 3. ENFORCEMENT. Subdivision 1. Noise Level Table. No person shall cause, or permit to be caused, any somce of noise in such a manner as to create a noise level exceeding the limits set forth below for the receiving land use category. Residential: Duration of Sound Less than 10 minutes Less than 2 homs More than 2 homs Homs: 7:00"a.m. - 10:00 p.1i1. 75db 70db 60db 10:00 p.m. - 7:00 a.m. 60db 50db 40db CommerciaVIndustriallMixed Use: Less than 10 minutes Less than 2 homs More than 2 homs 75db 70db 60 db 70db 60db 50db The limits of the most restrictive district shall apply at the boundaries between different land use designations. The determination of land use shall be by its zoning designation. Subdivision 2. Sounds ExemDt from Noise Level Requirements. Sounds emanating from the operation of outdoor implements, such as power lawnmowers, snowblowers, power hedge clippers, power saws, pile drivers, jackhammers, and other construction equipment, are exempt from the sound level requirements but shall observe the time restriction provisions of this subdivision Subdivision 3. ExceDtions for Soecial Events. The City Council shall have the authority, consisteat with this section, to grant exceptions from the requirements of any section of this ordinance for special events. Any person seeking an exception shall file an application at City Hall with the City Clerk: or hislher designee on a form prescribed by the City. The application shall state the dates dming which the application is proposed, the location of the noise somce and time of operation, the nature of the noise somce, reasons why the exception is sought, steps to be taken to minimi'7.e the noise level, and such other information as is required by the City. Effective 1110/90 City ofCenterville Ord. #49 The application will be presented to the City Council for consideration and may be approved only if the City Council finds that full compliance with the requirements of the ordinance would constitute an unreasonable hardship on the applicant, on other persons, or on the community. In determining whether to grant or deny the application, the City Council shall balance the hardship to the applicant against the adverse impact on the health, safety, and welfare of the persons affected, the adverse impact on property affected, and any other adverse effects of granting the application. The application may be granted subject to conditions, including a time limit, which shall be clearly stated. If the City finds that sufficient controversy exists regarding the proposed exception to the provisions of this ordinance, a public hearing may be held on the proposed application at which all persons affected shall be given aD. opportunity to be heard. Subdivision 4. Exception for Emergency Work. Noise created exclusively in the performance of emergency work to preserve the public health, safety, or welfare, or in the performance of emergency work necessary to restore a public service or eliminate a public hazard shall be exempt from the provisions of this ordinance for a period not to exceed 24 hours after the work. is commenced. Persons responsible for such work shall inform the police department, Building Inspector and City Administrator of the need to initiate such work: or, if the work is commenced during non-business hours of the City, at the beginning of business hours of the first business day thereafter. Any person responsible for such emergency work: shall take. all reasonable actions to minimize the amount of noise. Subdivision S. Criminal Penalties. Every person who violates any provision of this ordinance is guilty of a misdemeanor and shall, upon conviction. be subject to a fine, imprisonment, or both, and in either case, the cost of prosecution. Each act of violation and each day a violation occurs or continues constitutes a separate offense. . ~ Effective 1/10/90 City of Centerville Ord. #49 SECTION 4. SEVERABILITY. If any provision of this ordinance or the application of any provision to a particular situation is held to be invalid by a court of competent jurisdiction. the remaining portions of the ordinance and the application of the ordinance to any other situation shall not be invalidated. Adopted by the City Council this 27th day of October, 1999. APPROVED: (Si2J1llture on File) Mayor, Tom Wilharber Attest: (Signature on File) Diane F. Ward, City Clerk Amended: May 22, 2002 Published in the Quad Community Press on June 11, 2002 Amended: Published in the Quad Community Press on 205416_1 M' 'e ~ !~. : i~ _:' .. -~., '..... , '... "..:;..-.:.-......... ! qi "~;. ~-: _ i ;~'.~ u TO: Honorable Mayor and Council Members Teresa Bender, City Clerk{~ I FROM: SUBJECT: Res. #03-055, 056 & 057 DATE: October 17, 2003 Resolution #03-055, 056 & 057 are being compiled by the City Engineer, Finance Director & City Clerk. It is anticipated that these will be available for Council consideration at their meeting. Staff apologizes for the inconvenience this has caused. ervi[{e 'Esta6{isfied 1857 1880 Main Street . CenterviffeJ 9vf!J.l. 55038 (651) 429-3232 . ~ai( (651) 429-8629 STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF ANOKA CITY OF CENTERVILLE RESOLUTION #03 - 058 A RESOLUTION CALLING FOR PUBLIC HEARING ON DELINQUlENT SEWER, WATER & GARBAGE SERVICES FOR RESIDENTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE 3M AND 4TH QUARTER 2002, 1ST AND 2ND QUARTERS OF 2003 BILLING CYCLES. WHEREAS, City Ordinance #1, (Garbage), City Ordinance #30 (Sanitary Sewer) and Minnesota State Statute 429.101 give the City the authority to assess/certify delinquent services; and WHEREAS, the City Account Clerk n has compiled a list of those residents who have delinquent city services such as sewer, water or both and garbage services. These services are for the periods of3rd & 4th Quarter 2002, 1st and 2nd Quarter of2003; and WHEREAS, delinquent sewer, water or both total $17,822.22 and garbage services total $7,661.09; and NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF CENTERVlLLE, MINNESOTA: 1. The Account Clerk n and the City Clerk will calculate the proper amounts to be assessed for those residents that are delinquent. These amounts will be placed on County Records and payable on the property owner's 2004 property tax payable in 2004. 2. Shall file a copy of such proposed certifications available for inspection. 3. Shall include a $25 certification fee to all delinquent accounts. 4. Shall follow all requirements for the certification process by mailing notice to those residents that are delinquent and posting notice of public hearing to be held on November 12,2003. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council this 2200 day of October, 2003. Attest City Clerk Mayor 1880 :Main Street . CenteT'Clif[e, M!Jo.l.. 55038 (651) 429-3232 .:FQ.7( (651) 429-8629 October 15,2003 Mr. & Mrs. Joel Swenson 7016 Brian Court - Centerville, MN 55038 Dear Mr. & Mrs. Swenson: It was brought to the City's attention in July that your Accessory Structure/Shed is less than the required 5 feet fr9m the side setback from the property line and located within a drainage/utility easement On July 16, 2003 you received a Correction Notice from our Building Inspector requesting that you contact him for a reinspection and verification that the Accessory Structure/Shed had been brought into compliance. The City Administrator also left several messages on your voice.mail at (763) 780-5958 for you to contact her in regards to this issue. To date, no attempt has been made by you to contact either the Building Inspector, the City Administrator or to the relocate the structure in question. The City Administrator and I have had several discussions regarding this issue with your spouse and provided her with the ordinance that governed the location of the shed at the time that the shed had been constructed. I have enclosed the same information for your review. Upon the removal and new location of the shed that is in question, you must comply with the current ordinance that governs same. I have enclosed a copy of the current Ordinance #4 (effective 9/5/00) that pertains to accessory structures/sheds and their location your convenience. Please, note that no structure may be placed in a drainage/utility easement. The City formally request.s that you abate the above stated ordinance violation within thirty (30) clays of receipt of this letter (November 17, 2003) or the City will have no alternative but to proceed legally to have this violation brought into compliance. I have included Division 200: . Enforcement and Violations of the current ordinance that addresses the City's right to enforce non-compliance of Ordinance #4, (Effective 9/5/00). If you have any questions or concerns regarding this issue, please feel free to contact myself or Ms. ~oore-Sykes. Sincerely, ~-~,~~ Teresa Bender City Clerk Ene. Cc: Honorable Mayor and Council Members City Attorney, Mr. Tun Hoeft Effective 1/10/90 City ofCenterviJle Ord. #49 STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF ANOKA CITY OF CENTERVILLE ORDINANCE #49 AN ORDINANCE RELATING TO NOISE, PROVIDING FOR THE ELIMINATION AND PREVENTION OF PROHIBITED NOISE, AND IMPosING PENALTIES FOR VIOLATION. THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CENTERVILLE DoES ORDAIN: SECTION 1. NOISES PROHIBITED. The City Council finds that within the City, certain loud, avoidable, unnatural and unnecessary noises, which under certain circumstances and conditions constitute a serious threat to the health, welfare, contentment and the feeling of well-being of our residents. Excessive noise degra4es the environment of the City and the City has a substantial and, in some situations, compelling interest in controlling such noise. Subdivision 1. General Prohibition. No person shall make or cause to be made any distinctly audible, continuous, objectionable noise due to intermittence, frequency, beat, shrillness, or intensity that annoys, distmbs, injures, or endangers the comfort, repose, health, peace, safety, or welfare of any person or precludes their enjoyment of property. This geneml prohibition is not limited by the specific restriction of the following subdivisions. Subdivision 2. Radios. Phon02r8Dhs. Pam!!: Systems. Etc. No person shall use or operate or permit the use or operation of any mdio receiving set, musical instrument, phonograph, paging system, machine, or other device for the production or reproduction of sound in violation of the noise standards set forth in Section 3, Subdivision 1. Subdivision 3. ParticiDation in Noisv Parties or Gatheriru!:. No person shall participate in any party or other gathering of people in violation of Section I, subdivision 1. When a police officer determines that a gathering is creating such a violation, the Effective 1/10/90 City ofCentervilIe Ord. #49 officer may order all persons present, other than the owner or tenant of the :PreIDises, to disperse immediately. Subdivision 4. Animals. a Refer to Ordinance #24, Section 24.08 - Nuisances. SECTION 2. HOURLY RESTRICTION ON CERTAIN OPERATIONS Subdivision 1. Recreational Vehicles. No person shall, between the hours of 10:00 p.m. and 7:00 am., drive or operate any mini-bike/dirt bike, snowmobile, or any other recreational vehicle not licensed for travel on public highways. Subdivision 2. Domestic Power Eauioment. No person shall operate a power lawn mower, hedge clipper, chain saw, mulcher, garden tiller, edger, drill, or other similar domestic power maintenance equipment between the hours of 10:00 pm. and 7:00 am. Snow removal equiPment is exempt from this provision. Subdivision 3. Refuse Hauline:. No person shall collect or remove garbage or refuse in any residential district between the hours of 10:00 p.m. and 7:00 am. . Subdivision 4. Construction Activities. No person shall engage in or permit construction activities involving the use of hammers or the use of any kind of.IDL. electric, diesel, or gas powered machine or other power equipment between the hours of 10:00 p.m. and 7:00 am. Subdivision 5. Noise Impact Statements. The Council may require any person applying for a change in zoning classification or a permit or license for any structure, operation, process, installation or alteration, or project that may be considered a potential noise source to submit a noise impact statement It shall evaluate each such statement and take its evaluation into account in approving or disapproving the license or permit applied for or the zoning change requested. Effective 1/10/90 City ofCenterville om. #49 SECTION 3. ENFORCEMENT. Subdivision 1. Noise Level Table. No person shall cause, or permit to be caused, any source of noise in such a manner as to create a noise level exceeding the limits set forth below for the receiving land use category. Residential: Duration of Sound Less than 10 minutes Less than 2 hours More than 2 hours Hours: 7:00"a.m. - 10:00 p.m. 75db 70db 60db 10:00 p.m. -7:00 a.m. 60db 50db 40db CommerciaVIndustriallMixed Use: Less than 10 minutes Less than 2 hours More than 2 hours 75db 70db 60 db 70db 60db 50db The limits of the most restrictive district shall apply at the boundaries between different land use designations. The determination of land use shall be by its zoning designation. Subdivision 2. Sounds ExemDt from Noise Level Requirements. Sounds emanating from the operation of outdoor implements, such as power lawnmowers, snowblowers, power hedge clippers, power saws, pile drivers, jackhammers, and other construction equipment, are exempt from the sound level requirements but shall observe the time restriction provisions of this subdivision Subdivision 3. ExceDtions for Soecial Events. The City Council sWdthave the authority, consistent with this section, to grant exceptions from the requirements of any section of this ordinance for special events. Any person seeking an exception shall file an application at City Hall with the City Clerk or his/her designee on a form prescribed by the City. The application shall state the dates during which the application is proposed, the location of the noise source and time of operation, the nature of the noise source, reasons why the exception is sought, steps to be taken to minimize the noise level, and such other information as is required by the City. Effective 1/10/90 City ofCenterviIle Ord. #49 The application will be presented to the City Council for consideration and may be approved only if the City Council finds that full compliance with the requirements of the ordinance would constitute an unreasonable hardship on the applicant, on other persons, or on the community. In determinine whether to grant or deny the application, the City Council shall balance the hardship to the applicant against the adverse impact on the health, safety, and welfare of the persons affected, the adverse impact on property affected, and any other adverse effects of granting the application. The application may be granted subject to conditions, including a time limit, which shall be clearly stated. If the City finds that sufficient controversy exists regarding the proposed exception to the provisions of this ordinance, a public hearing may be held on the proposed application at which all persons affected shall be given an opportunity to be heard. Subdivision 4. Exception for Emergency Work. Noise created exclusively in the performance of emergency work to preserve the public health, safety, or welfare, or in the performance of emergency work necessary to restore a public service or eliminate a public hazard shall be exempt from the provisions of this ordinance for a period not to exceed 24 hours after the work is commenced. Persons responsible for such work shall inform the police department, Building Inspector and City Administrator of the need to initiate such work or, if the work is commenced during non-business hours of the City, at the beginning of business hours of the first business day thereafter. Any person responsible for such emergency work shall take all reasonable actions to minimize the amount of noise. Subdivision S. Criminal Penalties. Every person who violates any provision of this ordinance is guilty of a misdemeanor and shall, upon conviction, be subject to a fine, imprisonment, or both, and in either case, the cost of prosecution. Each act of violation and each day a violation occurs or continues constitutes a separate offense. . Effective 1/10/90 City ofCenterville Ord. #49 SECTION 4. SEVERABILITY. If any provision of this ordinance or the application of any provision to a particular situation is held to be invalid by a court of competent jurisdiction, the remainine portions of the ordinance and the application of the ordinance to any other situation shall not be .invalidated. Adopted by the City Council this 27th day of October, 1999. APPROVED: (SiPna:ture on File) Mayor, Tom Wilharber Attest: (Signature on File) Diane F. Ward, City Clerk Amended: May 22, 2002 Published in the Quad Community Press on June 11, 2002 Amended: Published in the Quad Community Press on 205416_1 TO: . ~ Honorab~ Mayor and Council ~:: i, vJJ-i ~ P ~ . ?:.~~=-~ U- TeresaBender,CilyCIerk "Ob~.~. Sedona Homes/Jackson Commercial, LLC. Developers Agreement FROM: SUBJECT: DATE: October 22, 2003 I forwarded the developers agreement that is in your council packet to both the City Engineer and the City Attorney for their review. I also forwarded the agreement to Mr. Paul Keller, Sedona Homes. Upon review, the City Engineer provided the hand written notations attached to this memo and as follows: The inclusion of language regarding private improvements such as utilities and the corresponding dollar amount of $90,000.00. Mr. Peterson also included $41,500.00 for landscaping and $4,500.00 for sodding of the common areas within the development. Wtth these recommendations, the developer's retainage would be adjusted accordingly. Upon receiving the attached facsimile copy of the developer's agreement from Mr. Keller with his suggested modifications, I forwarded a copy of the same. to Mr. Hoeft for his review. Staff along with Mr. Hoeft have the following concerns: . Sedona Homes would need to provide the City with documentation regarding Jackson Commercial's financial backing and orvni7.ationally documentation. . The City would need to review all purchase documentation regarding this agreement/contract. . It appears that Sedana Homes/Jackson Commercial, LLC. desires to phase the project. Individual development contracts would correspond with the phases. . Include language addressing the need of the developer to fu1fi11 all laws regarding ADA requirements. Parking ramps, space, signage, etc. prior to issuance of Occupancy Permits. . Sedona Homes/Jackson Commercial, LLC. has requested that the City allow for a one year guarantee/warranty regarding installation and construction of private utilities. This in turn would only allow a one year letter of credit. The City's previous policy has been two years for both of these requirements and deviation from the previous practice would be setting a precedence. DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT SEDONA HOMES - CENTERVILLE TOWN OFFICE pARK CENTERVILLE, MINNESOTA TIllS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this day of . 2003, by and between the City of Centerville, a municipal corporation organized ~ID.der the laws of the State of Minnesota (the ''City''), and Sedona Homes, a Minnesota Corporation (the "Developer"). RECITALS: WHEREAS, the Developer has applied to the City to be allowed at the Developer's expense to construct all swface streets, parking lots, curb and gutter, required landscaping, storm sewer, storm water ponds, drainage facilities, water main, and sanitary sewer facilities, hereinafter referred to as "Street and Utility Improvements"; and WHEREAS, the Developer is to be responsible for the installation and financing of certain private improvements within the development, hereinafter referred to as "Private Improvements". NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises of the parties made herein, it is agreed by and between the parties as follows: A REPRESENTATIONS OF DEVELOPER. As inducement to the City's approval and authorization to proceed with construction and entering into this Agreement, the Developer represents and warrants to the City: 1. That the Developer is the fee owner of the property and has authority to enter into this Agreement. 2. That the commercial development complies with all City, County, State and Federal laws and regulations, including but not limited to City subdivision ordinances and zoning ordinances. 3. The commercial development complies with all wetland protection legislation and will secure all required permits. 4. Attached as Exhibit B will be a letter stating that a permit is not need or that a valid permit from Anoka County for road access onto 20th A venue for the Developments driveway area(s) has been secured. B. PRIVATE IMPROVEMENTS. The Developer will construct and install at Developer's expense the general improvements construction according to the detailed plans submitted for development approval and attached and listed as Exhibit A. 1. Cost of Private Improvements, description: a. Landscaping as proposed in the site plan (Attached as Exhibit A) $ +I,)DO 4;pfIJ "i) b. Sod in the common areas q'.....i!s 'i("Ol)rr t:- (~/500~F ~ $ qo~(J /<4 :: (~'i) $Y.X: ? c. Striping of Parking Spaces ' Total Estimated Cost $4,000 1$50,000 ol\ U-h I, -I Ch .$' ,1,,000 X(. ~S- ..-::. 1010&0 Developer Retainage (150%) $ 7~DlJZJ Additional Private Improvements as outline in attachment Exhibit C. (Bonestroo, Rosene, Anderlik. & Associates letter date October 14, 2003. The above referenced Private Improvements shall be completed by October 1, 2004. 2. Also included as items associated with the Private Improvements, the Developer shall undertake or arrange to accomplish the following: a. Site Development Issues i. Coordinate with the utility companies to - provide for gas main, telephone lines, cable lines, and power lines to service the properties developed on the final plat according to the City's joint trench policy. ii. Provide seeding and vegetation maintenance and erosion control over denuded or graded areas and mitigation area, at the City's direction. iii. Establish a center monument (within the center driveway(s) entering the commercial _ site) within 60 days of grading completion or within 180 days after filing the final plat, whichever is sooner. This monument will be maintained by the association of the developer's choiceITown Office Park Association and not the City of Centerville. iv. Provide such street maintenance and control of builder's actions to maintain roadways clear of mud, soil, and debris to provide safe driving surfaces. The Developer shall provide street sweeping within 24 hours of the City's request for such services. The Developer shall accomplish or cause to be accomplished these actions according to generally accepted trade standards. To the extent possible, the construction vehicles for site grading, streets, and utilities shall access the site from 20th Avenue. b. Site Grading, Street Construction and Building Permits. No certificate of occupancy shall be issued without installation of bituminous parking lot c. Erosion Control. The Developer shall control erosion insuring: i. The Developer shall submit an erosion control plan, detailing all erosion control measures to' be implemented during construction. n. Erosion and siltation control measures shall be coordinated with the different stages of development. Appropriate control measures as reqUired by the City shall be installed prior to deyelopment when necessary to control erosion. n. Where the topsoil is removed, sufficient arable soils shall be set aside for respreading over the developed area. The topsoil shall . be restored to a depth of at least four (4) inches and shall be of a quality at least equal to the soil quality prior to development d. Inspection. All of the work shall be under and subject to the inspection and approval of the City, City Engineer, and where appropriate, any other governmental agency having jurisdiction. e. . Faithful Performance of Construction Contracts and Letter of Credit The Developer will fully and faithfully comply with all terms and conditions of any and all contracts entered into by the D~veloper for the installation and construction of all Private Improvements and hereby guarantees the workmanship and materials for a period of two years following the City's final a~ptance of the Private Improvements. The Developer agrees to guaranty for a period of one year the tree plantings required as part of the Developer's Agreement. Each specific tree guaranty period shall begin with the planting of each specific tree. Concurrently with the execution hereof by the Developer, the Developer will furnish to, and at all times thereafter maintain with the City, a cash deposit, certified check, or an Irrevocable Letter of Credit, based on one hundred fifty percent (150%) of the total estimated cost of the Private Improvements as indicated in Paragraph B 1. The Irrevocable Letter of Credit shall be for the exclusive use and benefit of the City of Centerville and shall state thereon the same is issued to guaranty and assure performance by the Developer of all the terms and conditions of Paragraph B 1 of -this Development Contract Sueh--l:.etter of Credit may be reduced upon completion and acceptance of the Private Improvements by the City to an amount deemed adequate by the City Engineer to cover the two year warranty period described herein. The City shall have the right during said warrant period to draw on the Letter of Credit for any warranty work that is necessary. The Irrevocable Letter of Credit shall be renewed or replaced by not later than twenty (20) days prior to its expiration with a like letter or bond. f. Reduction of Escrow Guaranty. The Developer may request a reduction of the Letter of Credit or cash deposit based on prepayment or the value of the completed Private Improvements at the time of the requested reduction. The amount of reduction will be determined by the City and such recommendation will be submitted to the City Council for action. C. RECORDING AND RELEASE. The Developer agrees that the terms of this Development Contract shall be a covenant on this entire project site. The Developer agrees that the City shall have the right to record. a copy of this Development Contract with the Anoka County RecorderlRegistrar to give notice to future purchasers and owners. D. REIMBURSEMENT OF COSTS. The Developer agrees to fully reimburse the City for all costs incurred by the City including, but not limited to, the actual costs of construction of said improvements, engineering fees, legal fees, inspection fees, interest costs, costs of acquisition of necessary easements, if any, and any other costs incurred by the City relating to this Development Contract and the installation and financing of the aforementioned improvements. E. OWNERSHIP OF IMPROVEMENTS. Upon completion of the work and construction required by this Contract and acceptance by the City, the improvements lying within the public easements shall become City property without further notice or action. F. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS. 1. Reimbursement of Costs for Defense. The Developer agrees to reimburse the City for all costs incurred by the City in defense of enforcement of this Contract, or any portion thereof, including court costs and reasonable engineering and attorney's fees._ 2. Validity. If any portion, section, subsection, sentence, clause, paragraph, or phrase in this Contract is for any reason held to be invalid by a court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect or void any of the other provisions of the Development Contract. 3. Waiver. The action or inaction of the City shall not constitute a waiver or amendment to the provisions of this Agreement. To be binding, amendments or waivers shall be in writing, signed by the parties, and approved by written resolution of the City Council. The City's failure to promptly take legal action to enforce this Agreement shall not be a waiver or release. 4. Binding Effect. The terms and provisions hereof shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the heirs, representatives, successors, and assigns of the parties hereto and shall be binding upon all future owners of all or any part of the Subdivision and shall be deemed covenants running with the land. S. Notice. Whenever in this Contract it shall be required or permitted that notice or demand be given or served by either party to this Contract to or on the other party, such notice or demand shall be delivered personally or mailed by United States mail to the addresses set forth below by certified mail (return receipt requested). Such notice or demand shall be deemed timely given when delivered personally or when deposited in the mail in accordance with the above. The addresses of the parties hereto are. as set forth below until changed by notice given as per above: Developer: Sedona Homes 4886 Highway 61, Suite 202 White Bear Lake, MN SS 110 City: City of Centerville Attn: City Administrator 1880 Main Street Centerville, MN 55038 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, City and Developer have signed this Development Agreement the day and year first written above. CITY: DEVELOPER: CITY OF CENTERVILLE SEDONA HOMES By: By: Mayor Its: President ATTEST: By: City Clerk STATE OF MINNESOTA) COUNTY OF ) )ss The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this _ day of , 2003, by the Mayor of the City of Centerville, a municipal corporation under the laws of the State of Minnesota, on behalf of the City. Notary Public STATE OF MINNESOTA) )ss COUNTY OF ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this _ day of . 2003, by the City Clerk of the City of Centerville, a municipal corporation under the laws of the State of Minnesota, on behalf of the City. Notary Public STATE OF MINNESOTA) ) 5S COUNTY OF ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this_ day of ,~ ~ ,2003, by ,a_ Notary Public . I' I" DEVUOPMENT CON'I'RACT JAc..k"Solla l"A.1l u. e ILt(d c.. .LL.C!. ~ - CEN'I'ERVILLE TOWN OmCE PARI< CENTERVILLE. MINNESOTA THIS AGRB~, Il\adu and entmod into this day of .2003, by 8.Ild between the City of CeDt8rVille, a municipal corporaticm orsan- \Ulder fb. laws of the State of MttU1CBOta (tho ClCitf'); ami SadoR& 3',"-\<1. ~ Hemet,. Mfnnosota Corparatl~ (tho "DevelOper"). C.~Mf"-. (" ~ Co RlClTALS: WHEREAS. the Developer bm appllcd to the Cit)' to be allowed at the Developerl! elq)6IIse to coastruct alt 8\Uface streets, parldng lote, ourb and gutter. requited hmdscapins. 1tOml8GWer, storm water ponds, dra!nago facilities, WBter main. and saniter)' sewer facUlties, herehtafter referred to as "Stteet and Utility ImproV81~entsn: loci WHEREAS, the Developer ,is to be responsible for the l1tsta1Wion Md flnanclng of eertain private Improvements within the development, hereinafter re&rred to as "Private ImproveJXIents". NOW, THBREFORB, In consideration of the mutual promises of the parties made herein, It fa _weed by and botwooD the parties as !onowa: A. REPRESENTATIONS OF DEVRLOPER. As Inducement to the City's approval and authorlzatlon to proceed with constructkm anet entering IDto this Asreement. the Develcper represents 811d warranta to the CIty: eo"'l'~ ptllI..e Hliflld, I. That the Developer Is the ,., ~ur of the property IDd has authmity to emer fntotbisAan=mcnt ANI) '''H~ .'IUt' Q\M"'~R. Ntlt (":t,I,I'ft,l "HI (.~ON"~N"t + ~ t ~ 0& b.eU ~(,o f€'A. r~ i:l "" 'f~ I! 1,..,.,.1 .,...,.... ~ AIS' --All' .. 2. That the commercial. development compU.. with all City. County, State and Fedoral laws II1d rol'Jiat!ons, lnoludJq but not limited to City $UbdMaloll. ordinances aocl zenmg ol'dhllnccs. 'J '..' . 3. The commorGial development compll811 with all wBtland protection legisJadon IIiI1d wllllltlcure all required permits. Attached as Exhibit B will be a Illtter statins that a permit is not need or that a valid perml1 ftoom Anoka County for road IICCCSS onto 20. Avenue tor tho Developmen.ta driveway lU'ea(.) hu been &ee:U1'ed. 4. B. PRIVATE IMPROVBMBNTS. The Doveloper will construct and mawl at DtMlopor's cxpoDSO the sellerallmprovements COt)stl\1CtIoa. aecording to the detailed plans ,.ubmitted for developm~t..L approvalandattaobedandlisteduExhibltA. .,.. _. If:olllllif~.,j III' 1~4.If' f4IS' '''/f Iud f'1\.H 'I. rst' II...'" 4'h...H, ,...:Af..d ~.\olI" P4Vf'Z IV I. Cost of Private ImprovemeDts, desorfptloD: C c..d h. .". a. LrmdsClapiag as proposed 111 the alte plan .J Urh ,...,6 (,Attacl1ed 8S Exhibit A) b. Sod in the ~mmOD I1"OU Loft ,...10 $ AOt'Zo)o Co Striping of:P&ridng Spaces Lcifr I"'~ Total Bstimateci Cost S 5/1.S (J ~fl 4Ji- t. ~14PO - 000' d 161# 1 1:60 SOOZ/OZlOl V099 19L 199 dIll:I8 AtBWOOl.NOW 3Hl:wo.J:I Developer Rcta.Inap (1.S0%) .., s ~,'U)t! AcldiUonaI PrIvate Improvements as outlIDe in e.ttacJnnent BxhIbit C, (Bonemoo. Roaone, AndorJik " Asso~l..1cttor dati October 14. 2009- The above referenced Private Improvements shall be completed by October I, 2004. 2. A1$o Inc11.ldeclas Items usociated with. the Private Improvements. the Developer shall undertake or lII'f8n88 to accomplish me follGw1q: a. Site Dsvelo.pmeJl.t IsauU iv. 1. CaordII1atcl with the utWty oompanies to provlde for gas main, telephone lines, cable lines. and power lines to serv!ee the propertkls developed on tb.a final plat aoaordlns to the City's joint tren.oh polley, ll. Provide aoedlq and vcptat10n malnttmlDce Illd erO$ion control over denuded or ended areas and mldgatioD. s:rea, ..~ r.he City's c1lreotlon. ill. Establfsh a center monument (withlrt the oentor c:1rlveway(s) OIlter:lnl tho c:ommcroJal - . lite) within 60 days ofsradhtg completion 01' within 180 days after mJns the t1naI Gl~ - . _.J/. .L .whio~er Is 8OOI1Cl. ~ monumeaiWr: D'. !6lJ6IN41.. ~ matntalned by the lISSooiation of the. developer'. choicetroWD OMct Park Association llIld not tho City ofContoryllle. Provldo such street m.ramtenrmrn! IIDd ccmtm1 'of builder's 80110118 to m.rafnt:J.lin roadways clear of_ sol~ and dobris to provide safe dmIDa surface.. Tho Developer shall provide atrect aweepins within 24 hours of tht City's raquestfor 81.1ch servIccla. ~JIfj'~ rtftJ/t!- ..; The Developer shall ao~mpllah or cause to be acocmpllshed these aotI01'lI accorcUDs to generally accepted trade staDciards, To tho oxtmt posslble, the construction vehlel. for site srad1n& streets, 8II.d utilities sIWl ac:oeu the site from 2()lh Avenue. b. Site. Ora.dins!. Street Construc1ion and. Buildul.Il Permit!. No ~ cert1tlcate of occupancy sha11 be lsaued. withoP.lt illBtallation of ~. L .t bilumtoout ~ e......t c....w,'2' """otc.$ '" ;x."...~~ .,. '!"''''''* , ~ \A~ jllJIl) :Jt-'....... ,... ~~tt.t~ ~P~deJ 4.v c..+v e...dNMi'UN ,r "'11M . ~ Cq v Erosion ~ Tbe Developer shall control. erosion . ~l/" ~ 111S1ltlng: ~ - vJJ-' Vi. The Oeveloper shall 8lIbmlt an- erosion vt~. _Ip~~~~~wl 800' d 161# 2:1:60 SOOYDUOl V099 CSL 199 d('(JC[l A~OOOOW 3Hl:WO.Jj meaaum to be implemented during can.structlon. ii. Broalon and siltation control measwos shall be coordfnl!lted with the dIflirellt &tages of dove1opmcnt Appropriate acnt.rolll1ellSUl'el as required by the City shill be Jnstallod ~ar to develop1nent wh8l1 necessary to oontrol oroa!on. li. Where the topsoil It removed, sufficient arable solls shall be set aside for respreaclJns over the develol'ed IIl'IL Tbe topsail ehalI be restored to a depth of at least four (4) inches and sba1I bo of a quality at least equal to the soll quality prier to development d. rnauectl.oll. All ot the work shaU be under and subject to the ~on IDd approval of the City. City Bngfnoor. and where appropriate, my other IJOvenuftmtal ageDC)' baving JurIsdiction. . e, Faithful Pertbftnance of COIlfb'UctiOl'l Contracts and Letter of ~ The Developer wt11 tully and faithfUlly comply with all terms and cOl1ditiODS of any BDCl all oontraclts entered Jnto by tho Dovolopel' for the Lnatallatlon and OCDStl'Uction of all PrIvate ImprOVelDenta and hore~ the workmanship awl IIWt1'fa1s for a perIod Of'MyeD following the City's tlnal accept:ance at the Private Jmprovemmll. The Developer agreee to paranty for a period of one year tho tree plantfnp required as part oftbe Developer's Agreement. Eaoh apecifie trca guaranty period shall besin with the pl.a.1Wng ot sa speolfla tree, ConC1.l1'l'OD.t1y with the execudon hereof by thll Developer, the Developer will fumlsh to, and at all t_ thoreatter maintain with the CIty, a cash deposit. cert1fIed check. or an. In'evocable Letter of Credit. blScd on ono hW1dred tlfty peroent (ISO%) of the totBl estimated COIK of the PrIvace Improvements as indicated In Paragraph B 1. The IrrIvocable Letter of Ctecllt shall be for tho exclusive use and benefIt of the City of Cent.rviUll and shall statl thereon the same II Issued to guaranty and usure performance by the Developer of all the terms aI1d gonclltioBS of Paragt'l1)h B 1 of this Developmeat Contract. Such Lettel of Credit may be reduced upon c:cmplltion end ICCIp1m1CO of the Private Improvements by the City to III &1Jl~!M deemed adoquato by the City EqiDeer to GOVl!' the iW8 year warranty period clescrlbcd herein. The City shall have the right dur1ns said W81'I'Bftt perJoC to draw on tho LettDr of Credit tor MY WIm'III1'ty war1c that ls D8ClSllary, The Irrevocable LeU... of Credit shall be renewed or l'IpllCed by not later 1han twenty (20) days prior to Its oxplmion with allko letter or band. f. Reductl.on of Escrow Guaranty. The Developer may request II reduotion of tho Lettor of Credit or cash dJp~ band on prepl)'Dlent or the value of the completed Private vaO. d 161# SI:6O 800UOUOl V099 19L 199 cID:lD A~OOlNOW 3Hl:WOJ.::! Improvemets at the tJme 01 the raqueat=d reduction. The amount of reducdon wm be dOlerrnmlQ by the City II1d such reclommondatlon will be S1lbmitted to the Ci~ COuncu for lotiOn. C. RECORDING AND llBLRASB. The Developal' asras that the terms of this DaV(llopJ;nl11t Contract shall be a covenant 011 this II1tire project a1to. The Oewlopor agrees that the City sball hive the right to record a copy of this Dewlopment Contraot with the Anaka County Record8l'~ar to give notIeo to fb1urc purcbssera and owners. D. REIMB~MENT OF COS11. The Devet01*' agrees. to fully relmbW'St the City for all costs Incurred by the City mc1udJ.D& but not limlted to, the actual costs 'of ccmstmcdon of said Improvements, ens{neerins fees, legal fees, hlapllotion fees. Interest OOlts. Gom of acquisition of neoeasary asemenra, if any, and any other coats IIlcurred by tbe City relatfng to this Development Contract II1d the lneea.\Jation and flDlmcina of the aforementioned Improvsmems. E. QWNBRSRIP Ol!.JMPROVR~, Upon completion ofthc,; work tmd conmctlon required by this CODtraat IU\d acceptance by the Ci\)', the Improvements 1)'1ns within the publIc easement$ shall become City property without fUrther notlce or actJClll, F. MISCELLANlIDUS PROVISlem.a. 1. Reimbursement of Coltll for Defense. The Dlveloper asrees to relmbme the City for 411 COit& Incurred b)' the Clty In dofcmsa of 811forcement oflhis Contract, or my portion thereof; laaluding court costa and re8$Onable eqlneer1Dg and attorney's fees; 2. Vallcllt)'. If' any portion, seotlon, subsection, sentenoe, clause, psrqraph, or phrase In this Contract Is for any reason held to be InvaUcl by I court af competent jurl4diotion. such decision shall not affeot or void any of the other provlslcms of the Development Colltraot. 3. Waiver. The action or 1m=ion of the City sheD DIll; con&titutc a waiver or amendment to the provlaiolll of this.Asreamll1t. To be bln_ amel1dmeate or waivers shall. be In writln& sJsned by the pertlea, and approved by wrlft$t1 resolution oUte City CO\lI1Cil. The City's mil\U'o to promptly take legal action to enforce this Asreemem shall not be a waiver Of release. 4. Binding Bffeot. The terms and provisions heroof' W1l be bindiq upon 8Ild Inure to the benefit of the heirs, I'Ipmentatlv~ auocetsors, IUld iSSigns of the parties hereto md shall be blndlng upon all future OWDers of all or any part of tlte SubcUvtslCln 8!l.d shall be deemed coveD.8ftts I'DMinI with the land. S. Notioc, Whenever In this Contract It shall be required or pemrltted that notIce or demand be given 0.1' served by either" party to this Contract to or on tho other party, such nodee or demand &.hall be deIlvered personalty or mailed by United States mall to the addreslI8s set forth below by csrrlfied maf1 (return receipt requested). Such notice or domed shall be deemed timely given whon delivered persoD8.lly or when deposited in the maU in aooordance with the above. The addrcssoa of' the parties hereto are l1li set forth below until cbansed by notloe given liS per above: Developer: r (I....J';'..1I ~_i'1 JO.c:.k~ ~M~C'A"',l.L.c. 4886 H1ch'WIY 61. Suite 202 White Bear Like, MN 5S 11 0 900" d [81# v[ :60 SOOZlOY01 V099 zgL 199 dnmID A~OOl.NOW 3Hl:WOJ:I . . City: City of CentervWe Atln: City A.clmlD.lstrator ]880 MaJn Street CtnterviU.. MN 5S038 IN WITNBSS WHEREOF, City and Developer have sigaecl thts Development Agreement the day and yeat' fir$1: written above. CITY: CITY OF CENTER.Vll.LE By. Mayor By: A'M'EST: Its: President By: city Clerk STATE OF MINNESOTA) COUNTY OF ) The foregoing iDB1rument 'WIll adcnowledpd betore me thla _ clay of , 2003, by the Mayor atthe City ofCemltvWo, I m\lDiClipat corporation under the laws of the State of Minnosoll1, on behalf orthe City. ) all STATE OF MINN2S0TA) COUNTY OF ) Notary PubUc )88 The forogolng Jnstrumen.t was acknowledsed before me thla _ day of , 2003, by the City Clerk of the City of Canterv1Uo. B. municipal corpcration UDder the laws of the Stale of Minnesota. an behalf of the City. Notary PublJo STATE OF MINNBSOTA) COUNTY OF ) )sa 900' d 161# 91:60 S00Z/0Y01 V099 7.SL 199 dflO~ AtBWOOlNOW 3HI:lUO.J:I . The foresolng mSU'Ument was acknowledged betoro me this day of . the of - . 2003, by .1- Nowy Publio . LOO. d L61# 9L :60 SOOllOUOl v099 7.SL L 99 dIlO~n AtBWOOlNOW 3Hl: UJOJ j .~ g Bonestroo Rosene Anderlik & Associates Engineers & Architects October 14, 2003 Kim. Moore-Sykes City of Centerville 1880 Main Street Centerville, MN 55038.;;9794 Re: Town Office Park File No. 616-03-000 Dear Kim: Bonestroo, Rosene, Anderllk.and Associates. Inc. Is an Affirmative Action/Equal Opportunity Employer and Employee Owned Principals: Otto G. Bonestroo. P.E. . MarvIn L Sorvala. P.E. . Glenn R. Cook. P.E. . Robert G. Schunlcht, P.E. . Jerry A. Bourdon. P.E. . Mark A. Hanson, P.E. Senior Consultants: Robert W. Rosene. P.E. . Joseph C. Anderllk, P.E. . Richard E. Turner. P.E. . Susan M. Eberlin, C.P.A. Associate Principals: KeIth A Gordon, P.E. . Robert R. Pfefferle, P.E. . Richard W. Foster, P.E. . DavId O. Loskota. P.E. . Michael T. Rautmann, P.E. . Ted K. FIeld, P.E. . Kenneth P. Anderson, P.E. . Mark R. Rolfs, P.E.' David A. Bonestroo, M.B.A. SIdney P. Williamson, P.E., LS. . Agnes M. Ring. M.B.A. . Allan RIck Schmidt, P.E. . Thomas W. Peterson, P.E. . James R. Maland, P.E. . Miles B. Jensen. P.E.. L Phillip Gravel III, P.E. . DanIel J. Edgerton. P.E. . Ismael Martinez. P.E. . Thomas A. Syfko, P.E. . Sheldon J. Johnson' Dale A. Grove, P.E. . Thomas A. Roushar, P.E.' Robert J. Devery, P.E: Offices: St. Paul, St. Cloud; Roche'Ster and Wlllmar. MN . Milwaukee, WI . ChIcago. IL Webslte: www.bonestroo.com EXHIBIT C ',to', \: ' - " : , ' :'- ./- ,,, '.' ~ I have reviewed the preliminary grading, drainage, eros~(jn cop.trOl, and utility plans dated August 18,2003 for the proposed I8-unit office complex on 20th Avenue. I have the following comments/recommendations: 1. Recommend an 18" reinforced concrete culvert under the entrance road rather than 12" RCP shown. 2. The sanitary sewer manhole invert elevations (IE) shown are incorrect and should be revised to the following: MIl 1 IE 894.02/893.92 MH 2 IE 894.70/894.60 MH 3 IE 895.53 MH4 IE 895.54 3. The tWo 6" water valves in the parking lot should be moved south approximately 20' to either side of the 6x6 tee. 4. Place 10 cubic yards of rip rap at the storm sewer outlet to the pond. . This should be shown on the grading plan. 5. Show silt fence around the entire site to prevent erosion into the pond, county ditch, and Clearwater cree~. 2335 West Highway 36 . St. Paul, MN 55113. 651-636-4600 . Fax: 651-636-1311 6. Include a parking lot section showing B612 concrete curb and gutter, 8" class 5 aggregate base, 2" bituminous base, and 1 1/2" bituminous wear. Crown the entire lot so 'Yater drains to the curb and gutter. 7. Note the height, length, and type of retaining wall located at the far north side of the site. Please call me at 651-604-4868 with any questions or concerns. Yours very truly, BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK, & ASSOCIATES I~~ Thomas W. Peterson TWP/crw 2 , .11. Bonestroo .... Rosene ii. . Anderlik & lj \J 1 Associates Engineers & ArdUtects October 9, 2003 Bonestroo, Rosene, Anderllk and Associates, Inc. Is an AffirmatIve Action/Equal Opportunity Employer and Employee Owned Principals: Otto G. Bonestroo. P.E. . Marvin L Sorvala. P.E. . Glenn R. Cook. P.E. . Robert G. Schunkht. P.E. . Jerry A. Bourdon. P.E. . Mark A. Hanson, P.E. Senior Consultants: Robert \IV, Rosene. P.E. . Joseph C. Anderllk. P.E. . Richard E. Turner. P.E. . Susan M. eberlin. c.P.A. Associate PrIncipals: Keith A Gordon. P.E. . Robert R. Pfefferle, P.E. . Richard \IV, Foster. P.E. . David O. Loskota. P.E. . Michael T. Rautmann. P.E. . Ted K. Reid. P.E. . Kenneth P. Anderson. P.E. . Mark R. Rolfs, P.E.. David A. Bonestroo. MB.A. . SIdney P. Williamson, P.E., LS. . Agnes M. RIng. M.B.A. . Allan RIck Schmidt. P.E. . Thomas W. Peterson, P.E. . James R. Maland. P.E. . Miles B. Jensen. P.E. . L Phllllp Gravel III. P.E.. Daniel J. Edgerton, P.E. . Ismael Martinez. P.E. . Thomas A. Syfko. P.E. . Sheldon J. Johnson' Dale A. Grove. P.E.. Thomas A. Roushar, P.E. . Robert J. Devery. P.E. Offices: St. Paul. St. Cloud. Rochester and Wlllmar. MN . Milwaukee, WI . Chicago. Il lIIebslte: wwwbonestroo.com Honorable Mayor and City Council City of Centerville 1880 Main Street Centerville, MN 55038 Re: Pavement Manage:ment Study' Bonestroo File No. 616':OJ~t~t' Dear Mayor and Council: . ': ~'~'~;;':~~':~~ :..;" " '. '. ~,_" J .;,.;;.,,~, :~"i. ...... . . "','. ,",:7;;~:{::",: ....................,.:.... In accordance with your au,~opz~~~~lJf.~~~~y.~~f~g~e4;~~r~~~i,nent Management Plan for the City of Centerville. 1'his pIan adiliesses~th~ii~'ffiH-orrehabi4t~\i;ig)he older streets and associated utility improvements in the City. The :Prima:frpwPose.o(~s:cRran'is.topfoVide the City Council and its staff with a planning tool to assist them in discussing funrre'iIDprovemen! projects with its residents. The plan discusses proposed street rehabilitation, necesswy utility 4IJ.prQv~nieIlts, estimated costs, possible assessments and a recommended capital improveme.ntpr9gram 'for 2.094 through 2012. Please contact us to discuss any portion of this s~y" or the project in g~neral. Yours very truly, BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, lNe. '1/uwrtla 0~ .~ Thomas W. Peterson I hereby certify that this report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. '7~ W/)jj;;::- ~ - Thomas W. Peterson, P.E. Date: October 9.2003 Reg.'No. 16610 2335 West Highway 36 s. St. Paul, MN 55113 Ii 651-636-4600 SI Fax: 651-636-131'1 M'e]" !.~\.~ .,. "lJj \j e TO: Honorable Mayor and Council Members FROM: Teresa Bender, City Clerk1.~ · SUBJECT: Liquor License Renewals 2004 DATE: October 17,2003 To date, the City has received only two (2) license renewals. These licenses have been forwarded to the Police Chief for his review. The Police Chiefwill be out of the office next week at a seminar. It also appears that at least one (1) of the license holders, who has not turned in his application, has delinquent sewer services to date. No research has been done with the County due to the lack of submissions. Those businesses that have filed their documentation do not own property within the City, they rent their premises. It is hoped that all renewals will be submitted prior to the November 12, 2003 Council meeting. ]-0....- ,<~1fii!'" ;'~'" < ~ r~<$ ~ ;~.,~_ ,.w-",....'-'< .', TO: Economic Development Committee Members FROM: Kim Stephan ~ SUBJECT: SNO BIZ Update DATE: October 16, 2003 SNO BIZ The Economic Development Committee tentatively selected Friday, February 20 & Saturday, February 21, 2004 for SNO BIZ. This will be in conjunction with the International Ice Racing Association's Car Races scheduled for February 21 & 22, 2004 on Centerville Lake. The committee would like the Experimental Aircraft Association, St. Genevieve's Church, The Quad Area Chamber of Commerce, the Parks & Recreation Committee and the Centerville Lions involved in SNO BIZ 2004. The committee will propose that the Centerville Lions have their -- annual fishing contest this weekend also. The date will be set at the next scheduled EDC meeting after discussing it with the other groups involved. The committee is also interested in changing the name from SNO BIZ to something associated with a winter Fete des Lacs. This will also be discussed at the next scheduled meeting. Vice-Cbairperson Backman suggested an old fashioned theme for Friday evening with a skate night, bonfire, hot chocolate and horse drawn hay rides. The Saturday events would be geared towards a'modern theme with airplanes rides and car races. -I I -I I 'f~ Chief of Police Joel D. Heckman Centennial Lakes Police Department 200 Civic Heights Circle Circle Pines MN 55014 763-231-2615 iheckmanrmcentenuiallakesod.com October 16, 2003 To: Chair Varian, Commissioners Re: Department Tours cc: City of Centerville, Circle Pines, Lexington As discussed at our meeting last Thursday, I have arranged for tours of the Anoka and Ramsey Police DepartDlents. The Anoka Police Department had scheduled an open house for their new facility on November 17, 2003 from 4-6pm. Therefore, as the 17th falls on a Monday we notified Anoka Police Department that we would be attending their open house and made arrangements to tour the Ramsey Police Department immediately after. If enough commissioners, mayors, councils and city employees are interested in taking the tours, I will make arrangements to have a bus pick us up at Circle Pines City Hall on Monday November 17, 2003 at 4:30 p.rn.. We would then head to Anoka for their open house and respond immediately afterwards to Ramsey PD. I would expect we could tour both departments and arrive back at Circle Pines City Hall by 7 p.m. or shortly thereafter. If the above is acceptable, please contact our office by October 31 st to reserve your seat on the busl Thank you. 11 g~ ~l~! ! ll! ~~' I~ !II ! o lEft 23, 24 Ii 25TH FROM 6:00 PM - 10:00 PM ... ",,- ,\,~ "\: \\l\ \\\\t\ t\\'\ 'i\. - \'1 DONATE A FOoD I7PM ::~I'ER_LE FOoD $l/EIJ AM 11IE I.tJCAL $1.(IU OFF AD! RECEIVE "IIIIION. ~ ~~'~ ~-- #~ ~ 4Jt ,~ ~~, Alllllimll: /(f/(J I'l · 16.f/(J 1fI1I':- 611 lIAr HID! 1Nct.~ r4 THE CENTERVlUE UON$ ARE A NON-PROFIT VOLUNTEER OReANI~110N. A PERCENTAGE OF MONEY RAISED WILL BE DONATED TO THE CENTENNIAL SCHQOL$. SPECIAL FINANCIAL A$SI$TANCE 1$ AVAILABLE FOR THOSE IN NEED. Handouts @ meeting ervi{{e ~Cisfiec{ 1857 1880 Main Street _ Centeroiffe, 9vftJ.L 55038 (651) 429-3232 -1"ai( (651) 429-8629 STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF ANOKA CITY OF CENTERVILLE RESOLUTION #03 - 055 A RESOLUTION DECLARING COSTS TO BE ASSESSED AND ORDERING PREPARATION OF PROPOSED ASSESSMENT FOR MUNICPAL SERVICES WITHIN THE PHEASANT MARSH n DEVELOPMENT AND CALLING FOR PUBLIC HEARING WHEREAS, a contract was entered into for the improvements of municipal services (roads, curb/gutter, water and sewer and street lighting) within the Pheasant Marsh Phase IT Development and the contract (bid) price for such improvement is $463,327.45 and the total cost of the improvements will be $625,880.00 and are proposed to be assessed to the Pheasant Marsh Phase IT development (27) parcels. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CENTERVll..LE, MINNESOTA: . 1. The portion of the costs to be assessed against benefited property owners is declared to be $625,880.00. 2. Assessments shall be payable in equal annual installments extending over a period of ten (10) years, the first of the installments to be payable on or before the first Monday in January, 2004 and shall bear interest at the rate of eight (8) percent per annum from the date of the adoption of the assessment resolution. 3. The City Clerk, with the assistance of the City Engineer and the Finance Director, shall forthwith calculate the proper amount to be specially assessed for such improvement against every assessable lot, piece or parcel of land within the district affected, without regard to cash valuation, as provided by law, and she shall file a copy of such proposed assessment in her office for public inspection. 4. The Clerk shall upon completion of such proposed assessment, notify the council thereof. 5. The owner of any property so assessed may, at any time prior to certification of the assessment to the county auditor, pay the whole of the assessment of such property, with interest accrued to the date of payment, to the City Clerk, except that no interest shall be charged if the entire assessment is paid within 30 days from the adoption of the assessment. He may at any time thereafter, pay to the City Clerk the entire amount of the assessment remaining unpaid, with interest accrued to December 31 of the year in which such payment is made. Such payment must be made before November 15 or interest will be charged through December 31 of the succeeding year. 6. A hearing shall be held on the 12th day of November, 2003 in the City Hall at 1880 Main Street commencing at 6:30 p.m. or shortly thereafter to pass upon such proposed assessment and at such time and place all persons owning property affected by such improvement will be given an opportunity to be heard with reference to such assessment. 7. The City Clerk is hereby directed to cause a notice of the hearing on the proposed assessment to be published once in the official newspaper at least two (2) weeks prior to the hearing, and she shall state in the notice the total cost of the improvement. She shall also cause mailed notice to be given to the owner of each parcel described in the assessment roll not less than two (2) weeks prior to the hearings. 8. The owner of any property so assessed may, at any time prior to certification of the' assessment to the County Auditor, pay the whole of the assessment on such property, with interest accrued to the date of payment, to the City Clerk, except that no interest shall be charged if the entire assessment is paid within thirty (30) days from the adoption of the assessment. He/She may at any time thereafter, pay to the City Clerk the entire amount of the assessment remaining unpaid, with interest accrued to December. 31 of the year in which such payment is made. Such payment must be made before November 15 or interest will be charged through December 31 of the succe~ing year. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City of Centerville this 22nd day of October, 2003. Mayor, Terry Sweeney Attest: City Clerk, Teresa Bender tervi{{e 'Esta6Eis1id 1857 1880 !Main Street . Centerviffe, 9vf!J{.. 55038 (651) 429-3232 . ~W( (651) 429-8629 STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF ANOKA CITY OF CENTERVILLE RESOLUTION #03 - 056 A RESOLUTION DECLARING COSTS TO BE ASSESSED AND ORDERING PREPARATION OF PROPOSED ASSESSMENT FOR MUNICPAL SERVICES WITHIN THE PELTIER PRESERVE DEVELOPMENT AND BENEFITED PROPERTIES OUTSIDE OF THE DEVELOPMENT ALONG CENTERVILLE ROAD, MILL ROAD, PELTIER CIRCLE & PELTIER LAKE DRIVE AND -. CALLING FOR PUBLIC HEARING WHEREAS, a contract was entered into for the improvements of municipal services (roads,. curb/gutter, water and sewer and street lighting) within the Peltier Preserve Development and municipal water services to the above stated benefited properties outside of the development and the contract (bid) price for such improvement is $461,220.00 and the total cost of the improvements will be $574,746.25. A total of $475,410.250f the assessments are proposed to be assessed to the Peltier Preserve Development (20) parcels and $99,336.00 to the benefiting properties outside of the development (24) parcels. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNcn. OF THE CITY OF CENTERVILLE, MINNESOTA: 1. The portion of the costs to be assessed against benefited property owners is declared to be $574,746.25 ($475,410.25 within the Peltier Preserve Development and $99,336.00 outside of the development). 2. Assessments shall be payable in equal annual installments extending over a period of ten (10) years, the first of the installments to be payable on or before the first Monday in January, 2004 and shall bear interest at the rate of eight (8) percent per annum from the date of the adoption of the assessment resolution. 3. The City Clerk, with the assistance of the City Engineer and the Finance Director, shall forthwith calculate the proper amount to be specially assessed for such improvement against every assessable lot, piece or parcel of land within the district affected, without regard to cash valuation, as provided by law, and she shall file a copy of such proposed assessment in her office for public inspection. 4. The Clerk shall upon completion of such proposed assessment, notify the council thereof. 5. The owner of any property so assessed may, at any time prior to certification of the assessment to the county auditor, pay the whole of the assessment of such property, with interest accrued to the date of payment, to the City Clerk, except that no interest shall be charged if the entire assessment is paid within 30 days from the adoption of the assessment. He may at any time thereafter, pay to the City Clerk the entire amount of the assessment remaining unpaid, with interest accrued to December 31 of the year in which such payment is made. Such payment must be made before November 15 or interest will be charged through December 31 of the succeeding year. 6. A hearing shall be held on the 12th day of November, 2003 in the City Hall at 1880 Main Street commencing at 6:30 p.m. or shortly thereafter to pass upon such proposed assessment and at such time and place all persons owning property affected by such improvement will be given an opportunity to be heard with reference to such assessment. 7. The City Clerk is hereby directed to cause a notice of the hearing on the proposed assessment to be published once in the official newspaper at least two (2) weeks prior to the hearing, and she shall state in the notice the total cost of the improvement. She shall also cause mailed notice to be given to the owner of each parcel described in the assessment roll not less than two (2) weeks prior to the hearings. 8. The owner of any property so assessed may, at any time prior to certification of the assessment to the County Auditor, pay the whole of the ~sessment on such property, with interest accrued to the date of payment, to the City Clerk, except that no interest shall be charged if the entire assessment is paid within thirty (30) days from the adoption of the assessment. He/She may at any time thereafter, pay to the City Clerk the entire amount of the assessment remaining unpaid, with interest accrued to December 31 of the year in which such payment is made. Such payment must be made before November 15 or interest will be charged through December 31 of the succeeding year. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City ofCenterville this 22nd day of October, 2003. Mayor, Terry Sweeney Attest: City Clerk, Teresa Bender ervi{{e T.sta6fisfiec[ 1857 1880 Main Street . Centervif{e, 9vf!AL 55038 (651) 429-3232 . ~ai( (651) 429-8629 STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF. ANOKA CITY OF CENTERVILLE RESOLUTION #03 - 057 A RESOLUTION DECLARING COSTS TO BE ASSESSED AND ORDERING PREPARATION OF PROPOSED ASSESSMENT FOR STREET IMPROVEMENTS MADE TO 902' OF MOUND TRAIL (pORTION OF SAID ROAD IS WITHIN THE BUECHLER ESTATES DEVELOPMENT AND A PORTION OF SAID ROAD IS OUTSIDE OF THE DEVELOPMENT (7185 & 7193 MOUND TRAIL ARE THE BENEFiTING PROPERTIES) AND CALLING FOR PUBLIC BEARING WHEREAS, a contract was entered into for the street improvement made to 902' of Mound Trail and the above stated benefited properties outside of the development and the contract (bid) price for such improvement is $68,995.00 and the total cost of the improvements will be $79,345.00. A total of $54,212.00 will be the responsibility of the City of Centerville, $22,825.00 will be the responsibility of Mr. Carl Buechler and the remainder $2,308.00 is proposed to be assessed to 7185 & 7193 Mound Trail (benefited properties). THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CENTERVILLE, MINNESOTA: 1. The portion of the costs to be assessed against benefited property owners is declared to be $2,308.00 (7185 & 7193 Mound Trail). 2. Mr. Buechler has entered into an agreement with the City of Centerville and is responsible for $22,825.00 associated with the Buechler Estates development street construction. 3. Assessments shall be payable in equal annllal installments extending over a period of ten (10) years, the first of.the installments to be payable on or before the :first Monday in January, 2004 and shall bear interest at the rate of eight (8) percent per annum from the date of the adoption of the assessment resolution. 4. The City Clerk, with the assistance of the City Engineer and the Finance Director, shall forthwith calculate the proper amount to be specially assessed for such improvement against every assessable lot, piece or parcel of land within the district affected, without regard to cash valuation, as provided by law, and she shall file a copy of such proposed assessment in her office for public inspection. 5. The Clerk sha1I upon completion of such proposed assessment, notify the council thereof. 6. The owner of any property so assessed may, at any time prior to certification of the assessment to the county auditor, pay the whole of the assessment of such property, with interest accrued to the date of payment, to the City Clerk, except that no interest shall be charged. if the entire assessment is paid within 30 days from the adoption of the assessment. He may at any time thereafter, pay to the City Clerk the entire amount of the assessment remaining unpaid, with interest accrued to December 31 of the year in which such payment is made. Such payment must be made before November 15 or interest will be charged through December 31 of the succeeding year. 7. A hearing shall be held on the 12th day of November, 2003 in the City Hall at 1880 Main Street commencing at 6:30 p.rn. or shortly thereafter to pass upon such proposed assessment and at such time and place all persons owning property affected by such improvement will be given an opportunity to be heard with reference to such assessment. 8. The City Clerk is hereby. directed to cause a notice of the hearing on the proposed assessment to be published once in the official newspaper at least two (2) weeks prior to the hearing, and she shall state in the notice the total cost of the improvement. She shall also cause mailed notice to be given to the owner of each parcel described in the assessment roll not less than two (2) weeks prior to the hearings. 9. The owner of any property so assessed may, at any time prior to certification of the assessment to the County Auditor, pay the whole of the assessment on such property, with interest accrued to the date of payment, to the City Clerk, except that no interest shall be charged if the entire assessment is paid within thirty (30) days from the adoption of the assessment. He/She may at any time thereafter, pay.to the City Clerk the entire amount of the assessment remaining unpaid, with interest accrued to December 31 of the year in which such payment is made. Such payment must be made before November 15 or interest will be charged through December 31 of the succeeding year. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City ofCenterville this 22nd day of October, 2003. Mayor, Teny Sweeney Attest: City Clerk, Teresa Bender ~. ... ervi{{e Update October 20 th~ough October 22, 2003 Receipts $18,582.04 Disbursements $11,987.05 CITY OF CENTERVlLLE 10/22/034:28 PM Page 1 Cash Receipts October 20 thru October 22, 2003 Tran Batch Amount Date Refer Comments Name Account Deser FUND 101 GENERAL FUND Act Type G $0.10 10/20/2003 o UB UR Receipt Group 01 10-20-03ut G 101-11500 Accounts Receivable $1.80 10/2012003 o UB UR Receipt Group 01 10-20-03UT1 G 101-11500 Accounts Receivable $0.58 10/21/2003 . OUB UR Receipt Group 01 102103UT-1 G 101-11500 Accounts Receivable $0.50 10/2112003 o 6873 MALLARD 10-2103 G 101-24502 Mach. Permit Surcharge $1.00 10/22/2003 o 1667 PEL TIER LAKE DR- 10-22-03 G 101-24500 Bldg. PellTllt Surcharge $6.50 10/22/2003 o 7112 BRIAN DR - 03-184 1 ()"'22-O3 G 101-24500 Bldg. PellTllt Surcharge $15.00 10/2212003 o 7131 -20TH AVE - C03-036 10-22-03 G 1Q1-245OO Bldg. PellTllt Surcharge $0.50 10/22/2003 o 6870 MALLARD WAY - 10-22-03 G 101-24503 Elee. Permit Surcharge Act $25.98 Act Type R $2,900.00 10/20/2003 o UQUOR & TOBACCO 10-20-03 R 101-00000-32100 Rentall1..lQuor $20.00 10/21/2003 o 6873 MALLARD 10-2103 R 101-0Q00()...32210 Buildlng/Mech. $279.30 10/2212003 o 7112 BRIAN DR - 03-184 10-22-03 R 101-00000-32210 Bullding/Mech. $110.00 10/22/2003 o 6870 MALLARD WAY -' 1 ()"'22-O3 R 101-OO00Q...32225 Electrical $92.80 10/2212003 o 1667 PEL TIER LAKE DR- 10-22-03 R 101-00000-32210 Building/Mach. $346.60 1012212003 o 7131 -20TH AVE - C03-036 10-22-03 R 101-00000-32210 Bulldlng/Mech. Act $3,748.70 FUND $3,n4.68 FUND 415 STORM WATER IMP PROJECTS Act Type R $136.83 10/20/2003 o UB Receipt Serv 10 DRAIN 10-20-03UT1 R 415-00000-32350 Storm Water $30.00 10/2012003 o UB Receipt Serv 10 DRAIN 10-20-03UT2 R 415-00000-32350 Storm Water $0.73 10/20/2003 o UB RecefptServPen 10 10-20-03ut R 415-00000-32350 Storm Water $79.32 10/20/2003 o UB Receipt Serv 10 DRAIN 10-20-03ut R415-00000-32350 StOIlTl Water $1.63 10/21/2003 o UB Receipt Serv Pen 10 102103UT-1 R 415-0000Q...32350 Storm Water $35.00 10/21/2003 o UB Receipt Serv 10 DRAIN 1 0-21 O3ut R 415-0000Q...32350 Storm Water $344.20 10/2112003 o UB Receipt Serv 10 DRAIN 102103UT-1 R415-00000-32350 Storm Water $14.89 10/21/2003 o UB Receipt Serv 10 DRAIN 102103UT-2 R 415-00000-32350 Storm Water $10.00 10/21/2003 O' UB Receipt Serv 10 DRAIN 1 021 03ut R 415-0Q00()...32350 Storm Water $0.50 10/22/2003 o UB Receipt Serv Pen 10 10-22-03UT R 415-00000-32350 Storm Water $59.44 10/22/2003 o UB Receipt Serv 10 DRAIN 10-22-03UT R 415-0000Q...32350 StOIlTl Water Act $712.54 FUND $712.54 FUND 601 WATER FUND Act Type G $8.18 10/21/2003 o UB Receipt Sure 1 SALES 102103UT-1 G 601-20800 State Sales & Use Tax $1.11 10/2212003 o US Receipt Sure 1 SALES 10-22-03UT G 601-20800 State Sales & Use Tax Act $9.29 Act Type R R 601-OO00Q...37100 Water Sales $634.68 10/20/2003 o US Receipt Serv 1 WATER' 10-20-03ut $7.61 10/20/2003 o US Receipt Serv 30 WATER 10-20-03ut R 601-00000-34400 Safe Drinking $0.75 10/20/2003 o US Receipt Serv Pen 30 10-2O-03ut R 601-OO00Q...34400 Safe Drinking $4.35 10/20/2003 o UB Receipt Serv Pen 1 10-20-03ut R 601-00000-37100 Water Sales $193.80 10/20/2003 o UB Receipt Serv 1 WATER 10-20-03UT2 R 601-00000;-37100 Water Sales $1,701.39 10/20/2003 o US Receipt Serv 1 WATER 10-20-03UT1 R 601.00000.;37100 Water Sales $241.29. 10/21/2003 o UB Receipt Serv 1 WATER 102103UT-2 R 601-OO00Q...37100 Water Sales $435.20 10/21/2003 o US Receipt Serv 1 WATER 10-2103ut R 601-QOOOQ...371 00 Water Sales $205.70 10/21/2003 o UB Receipt Serv 1 WATER 102103ut R 601-00000-37100 Water Sales $125.80 10/21/2003 o UB Receipt Serv 15 WATER 102103UT-1 R 801-00000-37100 Water Sales $3,554.66 10/21/2003 o UB Receipt Serv 1 WATER 102103UT-1 R 601-00000-37100 Water Sales $292.40 10122/2003 o UB Receipt Serv 1 WATER 10-22-03UT R 601-00000-37100 Water Sales $17.00 10t22f2003 o UB Receipt Serv 15 WATER 10-22-03UT R 601-00000-37100 Water Sales $5.21 10/22/2003 o US Receipt Serv 30 WATER 10-22-03UT R 601-00000-34400 Safe Drinking $0.52 10/22/2003 o UB Receipt Serv Pen 30 10-22-03UT R 601-00000-34400 Safe Drinking $4.76 10/2212003 o US Receipt Serv Pen 1 10-22-03UT R 601-00000-37100 Water Sales Act. $7,425.12 FUND $7,434.41 FUND 602 SEWER FUND Act Type R $1.341.03 10/20/2003 o US Receipt Serv 6 SEWER 10-20-03UT1 R 602-00000-37200 Sewer Sales $245.00 10/20/2003 o UB Receipt Serv 6 SEWER 10-20-03UT2 R 602-00000-37200 Sewer Sales sm.33 10/20/2003 o UB Receipt Serv 6 SEWER 10-20-03ut R 602-00000-37200 Sewer Sales $7.15 10/20/2003 o UB Receipt Serv Pen 6 10-20-03ut R 602-00000-37200 Sewer Sales $2. n2.52 10/21/2003 o US Receipt Serv 6 SEWER 102103UT-1 R 602-00000-37200 Sewer Sales $343.00 10/21/2003 o US Receipt Serv 6 SEWER 10-2103ut R 602-00000-37200 Sewer Sales $145.92 10/21/2003 o UB Receipt Serv 6 SEWER 102103UT-2 R 602-00000-37200 Sewer Sales $343.00 10/21/2003 o US Receipt Serv 18 102103UT-1 R 602-00000-37200 Sewer Sales $98.00 10/21/2003 o UB Receipt Serv 6 SEWER 102103ut R 602-00000-37200 Sewer Sales $49.00 10/2212003 o US Receipt Serv 18 10-22-03UT R 602-00000-37200 Sewer Sales $533.56 10/22/2003 o US Receipt Serv 6 SEWER 10-22-03UT R 602-00000-37200 Sewer Sales $4.90 1012212003 o UB Receipt Serv Pen 6 10-22-03UT R 602-00000-37200 Sewer Sales Act. $6,660.41 FUND $6,660.41 $18,582.04 *Check Summary Register@) OCTOBER 2003 Page 1 Name 10100 MAIN STREET BANK Paid Chk# 018574 AVUC Paid Chk# 018575 BROCK WHITE COMPANY Paid Chk# 018576 GOLDENGATE INTERNET Paid Chk# 0185n HUGO FEED MILL Paid Chk# 018578 INSTRUMENTAL RESEARCH Paid Chk# 018579 IRS/MAIN STREET BANK Paid Chk# 018580 MAGUIRE IRON INC Paid Chk# 018581 MENARDS - FOREST LAKE Paid Chk# 018582 MINNEGASCO. Paid Chk# 018583 MINNESOTA DEPT OF Paid Chk# 018584 MONTAlN, PAUL Paid Chk# 018585 NATIONWIDE RETIREMENT Paid Chk# 018586 PALZER, PAUL Paid Chk# 018587 PEIL, KATHY Paid Chk# 018588 PUBLIC EMPLOYEES Paid Chk# 018589 QWEST Paid Chk# 018590 SWEENEY, TERRY Paid Chk# 01859j TRU GREEN - CHEM LAWN Paid Chk# 018592 UNITED PRODUCTS Check Date 10/2212003 1012212003 1012212003 10/2212003 10I22l2OO3 10/2212003 10/2212003 1012212003 10/2212003 1012212003 1012212003 1012212003 10/2212003 10/2212003 1012212003 1012212003 1012212003 1012212003 1012212003 Total Checks Check Amt $456.00 DEF COMP - WIH 10-23-03 $102.70 SKATING RINK $50.00 INTERNET SERVICE - 982280 $3.75 RECOIL ROPE $34.00 OCTOBER 2003 WATER SAMPLES-TE $3,478.36 PAYROLL WIH 10-23-03 $895.00 SERVICE WATER TOWER $141.54 SUPPLIES $210.30 6970 LAMOTTE DR - SERV THRU 10 $554.30 PAYROLL WIH 10-23-03 $141.25 OVER PAID -BEST PRACTICES $729.00 DEP COMP W/H 10-23-03 $7.56 MILEAGE TO BLOG SEMINAR 10-16- $223.84 REIMBURSE FOR MATERIALS FOR WA $1,596.27 PAYROLL WIH 10-23-03 $60.74 651-762-9261 - SERV THRU11-12- $110.00 REIMBURSE FOR LUNCH AT WARMING $1,600.71 LAMOTTE PARK LAWN CARE $1,591.73 SHINGLES & ACCESSORIES $11,987.05 .' City of Centerville, MN Street Management Plan - General Obligation Bonding Scenarios The following scenatios reflect the City financing the 2004 and 2006 Reconstruction Projects along with the 2004 Mill and Overlay Projects as one bond issue. The 2008 Reconstruction Projects are not included in the bond. Local Debt Service Revenue Assumotions City Funds - Ad valorem (property) taxes and I Qr other funds - not to exceed $250,000 per year Special Assessments - Assessments against benefitting property owners - $936,139 assessed over the term of the bond scenario at an assessment interest rate of 2.00% over the average coupon rate that the City borrows at. G.O. Improvement Bonds 10-year term G.O. Improvement Bonds 15-year term Bond Size $2,595,000 $2,605,000 3.84% 4.43% $218,500 $161,500 $936,139 $936,139 10 years 15 vears 5.84% 6.43% $319,923 $243,610 Average Interest rate Annual City amount (property taxes & other revenues) Special Assessment Principal Special Assessment Term Special Assessment Interest Rate Average annual debt service Northland Securities 10/21/2003 .' DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT SEDONA HOMES - CENTERVILLE TOWN OFFICE PARK CENTERVILLE, MINNESOTA TIllS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this day of , 2003, by and between the City of Centerville, a municipal corporation organized under the laws of the State of Minnesota (the "City"), and Sedona Homes: a Minnesota Corporation (the "Developer"). RECITALS: WHEREAS, the Developer has applied to the City to be allowed at the Developer's expense to construct all smface streets, parking lots, curb and gutter, required landscaping, storm sewer, storm water ponds, drainage facilities, water main, and sanitary sewer facilities, hereinafter referred to as "Street and Utility Improvements"; and WHEREAS, the Developer is to be responsible for the installation and financing of certain private improvements within the development, here~ referred to as ''Private Improvements". NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises of the parties made herein, it is agreed by and between the parties as follows: A. REPRESENTATIONS OF DEVELOPER. As inducement to the City's approval and authorization to proceed with construction and entering into this Agreement, the Developer represents and warrants to the City: 1. That the Developer is the fee owner of the property and has authority to enter into this Agreement. 2. That the commercial development complies with all City, County, State and Federal laws and regulations, including but not limited to City subdivision ordinances and zoning ordinances. 3. The commercial development complies with all wetland protection legislation and will secure all required permits. 4. Attached as Exlubit B will be a letter stating that a permit is not need or that a valid permit from Anoka County for road access onto 20th Avenue for the Developments driveway area(s) has been secured. B. PRIVATE IMPROVEMENTS. The Developer will construct and install at Developer's expense the general improvements construction according to the detailed plans submitted for development approval and attached and listed as Exlubit A. 1. Cost of Private Improvements, description: a. Landscaping as proposed in the site plan $ (Attached as Exhibit A) b. Sod in the common areas $ c. Striping of Parking Spaces $4,000 Total Estimated Cost $50,000 Developer Retainage (150%) $ Additional Private Improvements as outline in attachment Exlubit C. (Bonestroo, Rosene, Anderlik & Associates letter date October 14, 2003. The above referenced Private Improvements shall be completed by October 1, 2004. 2. Also included as items associated with the Private Improvements, the Developer shall undertake or arrange to accomplish the following: a. Site Develol>ment Issues i. Coordinate with the utility companies to provide for gas main, telephone lines, cable . lines, and power lines to service the properties developed on the :final plat according to the City's joint trench policy. ii. Provide seeding and vegetation maintenance and erosion control over denuded or graded areas and mitigation area, at the City's direction. iii. Establish a center monument (within the center driveway( s) entering the commercial site) within 60 days of grading completion or - within 180 days after filing the :final plat, whichever is sooner. This monument will be maintained by the association of the developer's choice/Town Office Park Association and not the City of Centerville. lV. Provide such street maintenance and control of builder's actions to maintain roadways clear of mud, soil, and debris to provide safe driving surfaces. The Developer shall provide street sweeping within 24 hours of the City's request for such services. The Developer shall accomplish or cause to be accomplished these actions according to generally accepted trade standards. To the extent possible, the construction vehicles for site grading, streets, and utilities shall access the site from 20th Avenue. b. Site Gradinp'. Street Construction and Building Permits. No certificate of occupancy shall be issued without installation of bituminous parking lot c. Erosion Control. The Developer shall control erosion insuring: 1. The Developer shall submit an erosion control plan, detailing all erosion control measures to be implemented during construction. ii. Erosion and siltation control measures shall be coordinated with the different stages of development Appropriate control measures as required by the City shall be installed prior to development when necessary to control erosion. ii. Where the topsoil is removed, sufficient arable soils shall be set aside for respreading over the developed area. The topsoil shall be restored to a depth of at least four (4) inches and shall be of a quality at least equal to the soil quality prior to development d. Wsl>ection. All of the work shall be under and subject to the inspection and approval of the City, City Engineer, and where appropriate, any other governmental agency having jurisdiction. e. Faithful Performance of Construction Contracts and Letter of Credit. The Developer will fully and faithfully comply with all terms and conditions of any and all contracts entered into by the Developer for the installation and construction of all Private-Improvements and hereby guarantees the workmam:hip and materials for a period of two years following the City's final acceptance of the Private Improvements. The Developer agrees to guaranty for a period of one year the tree plantings required as part of the Developer's Agreement. Each specific tree guaranty period shall begin with the planting of each specific tree. Concurrently with the execution hereof by the Developer, the Developer will furnish to, and at all times thereafter maintain with the City, a cash deposit, certified check, or an Irrevocable Letter of Credit, based on one hundred fifty percent (150%) of the total estimated cost of the Private Improvements as indicated in Paragraph B 1. The Irrevocable Letter of Credit shall be for the exclusive use and benefit of the City of Centerville and shall state thereon the same is issued to guaranty and assure performance by the Developer of all the terms and conditions of Paragraph B 1 of _this Development Contract Such Letter of Credit may be reduced upon completion and acceptance of the Private Improvements by the City to an amount deemed adequate by the City Engineer to cover the two year warranty period descnbed herein. The City shall have the right during said warrant period to draw on the Letter of Credit for any warranty work that is necessary. The Irrevocable Letter of Credit shall be renewed or replaced by not later than twenty (20) days prior to its expiration with a like letter or bond. f. Reduction of Escrow Guaranty. The Developer may request a reduction of the Letter of Credit or cash deposit based on prepayment or the value of the completed Private Improvements at the time of the requested reduction. The amount of reduction will be determined by the City and such recommendation will be submitted to the City Council for action. C. RECORDING AND RELEASE. The Developer agrees that the terms of this Development Contract shall be a covenant on this entire project site. The Developer agrees that the City shall have the right to record a copy of this Development Contract with the Anoka County Recorder/Registrar to give notice to future purchasers and owners. D. REIMBURSEMENT OF COSTS. The Developer agrees to fully reimburse the City for all costs incurred by the City including, but not limited to, the actual costs of construction of said improvements, engineering fees, legal fees, inspection fees, interest costs, costs of acquisition of necessary easements, if any, and any other costs incurred by the City reJiting to this Development Contract and the installation and financing of the aforementioned improvements. E. OWNERSIllP OF IMPROVEMENTS. Upon completion of the work and construction required by this Contract and acceptance by the City, the improvements lying within the public easements shall become City property without further notice or action. ~ F. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS. 1. Reimbursement of Costs for Defense. The Developer agrees to reimburse the City for all costs incurred by the City in defense of enforcement of this Contract, or any portion thereof, including court costs and reasonable engineering and attorney's fees. 2. Validity. If any portion, section, subsection, sentence, clause, paragraph, or phrase in this Contract is for any reason held to be invalid by a court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect or void any of the other provisions of the Development Contract. 3. Waiver. The action or inaction of the City shall not constitute a waiver or amendment to the provisions of this Agreement. To be binding, amendments or waivers shall be in writing, signed by the parties, and approved by written resolution of the City Council. The City's failure to promptly take legal action to enforce this Agreement shall not be a waiver or release. 4. Binding Effect. The terms and provisions hereof shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the heirs, representatives, successors, and assigns of the parties hereto and shall be binding upon all future owners of all or any part of the Subdivision and shall be deemed covenants running with the land. 5. Notice. Whenever in this Contract it shall be required or permitted that notice or demand be given or served by either party to this Contract to or on the other party, such notice or demand shall be delivered personally or mailed by United States mail to the addresses set forth below by certified mail (return receipt requested). Such notice or demand shall be deemed timely given when delivered personally or when deposited in the mail in accordance with the above. The addresses of the parties hereto are as set forth below until changed by notice given as per above: Developer: Sedona Homes 4886 Highway 61, Suite 202 White Bear Lake, MN 55110 ~ City: City of Centerville Attn: City Administrator 1880 Main Street Centerville, MN 55038 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, City and Developer have signed this Development Agreement the day and year first written above. CITY: DEVELOPER: CITY OF CENTERVILLE SEDONA HOMES By: By: Mayor Its: President A TIEST: By: City Clerk STATE OF MINNESOTA) ) ss COUNTY OF ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this _ day of , 2003, by the Mayor of the City of Centerville, a municipal corporation under the laws of the State of Minnesota, on behalf of the City. Notary Public STATE OF MINNESOTA) ) ss COUNTY OF ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this _ day of . 2003, by the City Clerk of the City of Centerville, a municipal corporation under the laws of the State of Minnesota, on behalf of the City. Notary Public STATE OF MINNESOTA) )ss COUNTY OF ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this _ day of .~ ~ , 2003, by .a_ Notary Public 1- I I I ~ I , I I I I I I I ~ I l I I I I I I I I I I I I " I ~ .... ~ i =1 s III ~",Q" sj ..,- "'008 :h 01 '" ;~] ~ ",i '"' g;... i ~ '"' i ~ ~ ,g ~t !{ ~ ~ I;t]:I~ i~ Jll S ~ ~~c5:o~ii "Eo" -ll ~~ ~ ~ i"[B~--t=a rn~ j..ll ~~ ~i u"'~~ &!lei Oll ~)j ~ 11~"!2 >-.r'>.;JliloC to; 12 "'= _.... C;;;l C ..c c5 Oll.!!l O ~ lQi!; ~!~ gg'!'~ ~ eo ..~.H:~!! "'.....0 I I I ~ g ~.~ -;g .13 ~ ja - ... ~ c !a c:l !a~ _c c..-; bO> .13 e .. !a c.. !:i5.g. o.~ .s z~<I.l .- III I~I U.r ~ ~'tj ~Ij o F- ~ ~ ~ 'tj I I I I I I I I I . I l lC I J I . r I I I I - I - I .J I I . I I II I1!r ~ ~ !! ! ! II filii! b I '15 II nUll · ~ "!P& I !g ra '11 i! p. '~~~~I~ ~ ". I~ !I 111;11 116 II ! III i I ___...I .----- I I --/' u . II II!I ............ . z . 4:.1 )it (3 l5 6 I ~ ~ II I ~ ~ ~~~h ~ II ~;:I g 1=1 ~~Idi Q; U! ~I ~ III . JE III I C fll JlfJlfb ~ .lll!lfllllll II c II11111II1I1 I ~ II' It!! 1 f!1 · C) I. III I ~ _ . iDGS~_