The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2003-08-27 CC Packet j CITY COUNCIL MEETING Wednesday, August 27, 2003 6:30 P.M. COUNCIL MEETING f)~-j~ c~ 1. Roll Call . I p~ /C!; ./~ ll. APPROVAL OF AGENDA vL- . (} k { , \ 1. m. ~PROV~UNCIL MINUTES Iv(/ 1.J ~ " Cbf"1 l.~Angust 13, 2003 Council Meeting Minutes IV. CONSENT AGENDA J '~D;P If~ City ofCenterville August 14, 2003 through August 27,2003 Claims V~ 2. Centennial Fire District Claims V. A W ARDS/PRESENTATIONS/APPEARANCES I. CALL TO ORDER VI. PUBLIC HEARINGS ~ I . ih J A / l..Le-- ./ /' ~ (I, LPn,! -!c qfi-y .4-~ tfD J(. . Ordinance #49 - Noise (Tabled from previous meeting) -#--,Yr-""'" ~ Pheasant Marsh Phase ill -lv.{USAlCo9W. Plan Amendment & Final Plat '1',0{- (Cont'd) due to Tied Vote V~r 'f~ tf--I (J '. ~6' 3, Hunter's Crossing 2nd Addition - Municipal Utilities and Street 1,,01 ''''1'~vYImprovements (Resolution #03-043) ~/UL/ VI. NEW BUSINESS ....- Resolution #03-044 - Closing Hunters Crossing 1 st Addition Project ~ Resolution #03-045 - Transfer Funds for Water Main - Pheasant Marsh ~ Phase I * . Resolution~046 - Ordering Preparation of Report - Municipal Street - ~ Project V~/~ ~_D . ~ " "TNT ~a5' ~;&.& or 'b..c. z,.3(1'~.) - V~ LIJ #} -. ~ . LD BUSINESS 5". rJDt~ f)r-~ 4'oY ~ ~ ~ - ~ II;~ - 11/t:'fPIh ~ Hunters Crossing Developers Agreement - T~ - V~ I~ ~ Ordinance #77 (Clean-up of Clandestine Drug Lab Sites and Chemical Dump Sites) - Draft Water Tower Feasibility Report (T. Pe~rson) ~I t..L.e- tb - 0 Lift Station Generator ~ /~ ~flV-V- llY ~~tv-~ 3. 4. 5. \". \) IX. x. ANNOUNCEMENTSIUPDATES Xcel EnergylLift Station (Update) r' ~/2-f Mound Trail Reconstruction (Update) - PI'e...ttn'\ r - ~ . CounciJ/CommitteelCommissiol:llCounty Joint Meeting (Update) . oct ,"'\ c1 (f 1 HUroricbUonution(Updue-Capr~ A~ub~ish Hauler Contract & Ordinance (Update) ') ~ Q> - Sty~ #r ~ _ eJrvl "? EXECUTIVE SESSION 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 1. Outstanding Capital Improvement Projects XI. ADJOURNMENT <i" ~S / CITY OF CENTERVILLE CITY COUNCIL MEETING AUGUST 13,2003 6:30 p.rn. Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, the City of Centerville held their regularly scheduled meeting on August 13,2003, at City Hall, 1880 Main Street. PRESENT: Mayor Terry Sweeney Council Member Lee Council Member Capra Council Member Paar t'~~ til'Ji" w,-',',', " f~~ ABSENT: Council Member Broussard Vickers STAFF: City Administrator, Ms. Moore-Sykes City Attorney, Mr. Hoeft City Engineer, Mr. Peterson Public Works Director, Mr. Palzer I. CALL TO ORDER Mayor Sweeney called the August 13, 2003, City Council meeting to order at 6:30 p.m. IT. SET AGENDA Ms. Moore-Sykes requested that Pay Request Number 1 from Dave Perkins Contracting Inc., for Peltier Preserve Street and Utilities be added to the Consent Agenda. Ms. Moore-Sykes requested that repair of the culvert at LaMotte Park be added under New Business and that Mr. Schoeberlein be added under appearances. Council Member Capra requested an update on Eagle Pass be added. MOtiOD bv C-OUDcll Member L~ secondecl-bv CouDcll Member Paar to approve the al!enda as amended. All in favor. Motion carried unanimouslv. ID. APPROVAL OF COUNCIL MINUTES I. July 30. 2003 Council Meeting Minutes Mayor Sweeney requested the following changes: On Page 2 of 24, second sentence from bottom indicated there were some issues. Page 4, third paragraph last sentence change he to ''the.'' On Page 7, fourth paragraph remove the word "says". On Page 15, City of Centerville August 13, 2003 Council Meeting Minutes fourth paragraph from bottom insert the word want. Page 15, second paragraph from the bottom change "are" to "area". Page 23, fourth paragraph from bottom, last sentence change discussion to our department. Motion by Council Member Paar. seconded bv Council Member Lee to approve the July 30. 2003 Council Meetine Minutes as Amended. AIl in favor. Motion carried unanimously. IV. CONSENT AGENDA 1. The City of Centerville July 10, 2003 through July 23, 2003 Claims for Approval 2. Centennial Fire District Claims 3. Pay Request Number 1 Dave Perkins Contracting Inc., for Peltier Preserve Street and Utilities Council Member Capra questioned the $22,000 payment to Bonestroo. Mr. Peterson indicated that a larger bi11like that is usually for the design of a project and Peltier is the most current one so he believes that it is for Peltier Preserve. He then said that there is usually an escrow set aside for funding the engineering on the projects and it is not an expense of the City. Council Member Lee asked if Mr. Peterson had been out to Peltier Preserve and whether things are done to his satisfaction. Mr. Peterson indicated that Dan Schluender is the engineer in the field and he has signed off on the work. He then said that this is a $141,498.70 payment outofa $500,000 project and a11looks fine to him. Motion by Council Member Lee. seconded by Council Member Capra to approve the Consent Aeenda as presented. AIl in favor. Motion carried unanimously. v. A W ARDSIPRESENTATIONS/APPEARANCES 1. Wes Schoeberlein Water Issue Pheasant Marsh Mr. Wes Schoeberlein, 1744 Partridge Place, addressed the Council and explained his water issue and provided the same pictures that were provided to the Planning Commission in addition to a few new ones with pictures of water in the basement. He explained that he has lived at the property for 16 years and has never had a water problem and now that the area has been developed there was a large rain fall in May and there was standing water everywhere and water in his basement. Mayor Sweeney asked if the marginal wetland discussed by Mr. Schoeberlein was to be a retention pond. Mr. Peterson indicated there is a culvert that takes it out to the north when it rises. Council Member Capra indicated the memo received from Staff indicates that Mr. Schoeberlein intends to install drain tile. Page 2 of 13 City of Centerville August 13, 2003 Council Meeting Minutes Mr. Schoeberlein indicated that he has not done anything yet because he needs to do research into what is appropriate because it is a major investment. He then indicated that, when his house was built, drain tile and sump pumps were not required and doing so after the fact is costly. Council Member Capra asked what the recommendation from Planning and Zoning was for this matter. Ms. Moore-Sykes indicated that the Planning Commission recommended approval of the MUSA advancement and asked that Council look into the water issues with Mr. Schoeberlein and review the overall drainage plan for the development before the commencement of construction on Phase ill. Mr. Palzer indicated that in 1996 or 1997 the City was going to do some ditching in the area because of an ongoing drainage problem in the area but the City does not have easements there and when the City attempted to get them, the City met with resistance from the neighbors. He then said that with the development of Pheasant Marsh water from 8 to 10 acres has been rerouted and no longer goes through his backyard as it had. He then said that the ditch was cleaned out and if that was continued that would help but there is no easement in the area Council Member Capra asked if the City has the right to have water running off onto that property if there is no drainage easement. City Attorney Hoeft indicated that the City is only going to use easements for drainage and utilities. He then said that if the property owner wants to grant an easement, the City can look at doing the work or the City could look at the benefit of condemning the property for an easement. Mayor Sweeney asked for a map from Public Works of the area to review and discuss at the work session. Mr. Palzer indicated that there was fabric over the drain so the drainage change was not effective until sometime this summer. Mr. Peterson indicated that most of the water comes from the backyards and there are no easements in that area. Mr. Palzer indicated that the City has a few options, but commented that Center Street drains a lot of water through the backyards and when--the street is reconstructed the-(;ity could look at rerouting water to the north so that it does not drain into the backyards. Council Member Lee asked if there is standing water now. Mr. Schoeberlein indicated there is not but said it has been very dry. Mr. Schoeberlein indicated that if the work done after the pictures were taken solves the water problem he would be happy, but if after a rain storm he still has water, he will be back. Page 3 of 13 City of Centerville August 13, 2003 Council Meeting Minutes VI. PUBLIC HEARING(S) 1. Ordinance #49 - Noise Council Member Capra indicated she contacted the U of M and obtained generalized information on decibel levels. City Attorney Hoeft indicated that in using this type of ordinance in another community, they ran into concerns with regard to prosecution of the ordinance when it was determined that the ambient noise level of the area exceeded the limits of the ordinance. He then suggested that the City take readings in various parts of the City to determine what the ambient noise level is. Mr. Palzer indicated there have been noise complaints on air conditioners and pool pumps. Council Member Capra suggested taking readings at times and places of previous complaints. ~ Council agreed to continue the public hearing and <ij.Lect staff to purchase two decibel meters and have staff take readings and report to Council. --. Motion was made bv Council Member CaDra and seconded bv Council Member Paar to continue the DubHe hearin!!. All in favor. Motion carried unanimouslv. Council Member Capra mdicated she has concerns with how the nuisance ordinance relates to the noise ordinance. City Attorney Hoeft indicated that there is a condition in the noise ordinance that indicates an officer can determ.i:i:1e that a noise creates a nuisance. Mayor Sweeney continued the public hearing to the next meeting. 2. Pheasant Marsh Phase ill - MUSA/Comprehensive Plan Amendment & Final Plat Mayor Sweeney opened the public hearing at 7:05 p.m. Ms. Moore-Sykes indicated that the City has not yet received comments from the Metropolitan Council on the MUSA advancement. She then recommended that any approvals be contingent upon receiving approval from the Met Council. Mr. Runkle indicated that he, his engineer and his attorney were present for the discussion. He then said that, if it is determined that they are the cause of the water issues, they will work diligently with the City to correct the problem. He further commented that the drainage plan was prepared by the City's engineer and approved by the City. Page 4 of 13 -'i_" ..-_. .' " City of Centerville August 13, 2003 Council Meeting Minutes Mr. Runkle indicated he spoke with Dean Johnson from Resource Strategies this afternoon who feels there should not be an issue with Met. Council's approval but no official word has been received. Mr. Runkle indicated that homes are building out faster than what was anticipated and they would like to continue on. Council Member Capra asked for information on the trail through Phase ill. Mr.' Peterson indicated the trail will go down the south side of Dupre. Mr. Runkle pointed out on the map where the trail would be located indicating that it goes down the south side of Dupre and then through the high spots of the wetland area. Council Member Capra asked where the trail comes out. Mr. Palzer indicated that the trail comes out near the lift station. City Attorney Hoeft and Mr. Runkle discussed the trail and how it is designated on the plat and Mr. Hoeft indicated that he would be fine with the trail location being within the easement for drainage and utility. Council Member Capra indicated that Mr. Runkle wrote a note with regard to the 60 day waiver. City Attorney Hoeft indicated that as far as he knows the City has no issue from his reading of Mr. Johnson's letter regarding the Comprehensive Plan amendment. City Attorney Hoeft indicated that the final plat could be approved with the conditions that the developer's contract be executed and a response from the Met. Council on the MUSA advancement. Mr. Palzer asked that Council ask that the building pads be larger in the third phase because they have been running into substantial soil correction issues because the houses are larger than the pads. Mr. Runkle indicated the pads should be big enough but some houses are angled on the lot and go off on the comer. He then said that the 50 x 60 should be adequate and they are watching it closely. Mr. Palzer asked that the pads be 60 x 60 to eliminate future soil correction issues. Council Member Capra indicated that she would vote against the advancement of MUSA to remain consistent on her opposition to building out the City faster than scheduled. Motion was made by Council Member Capra and seconded by Council Member Paar to close the public hearin!!. All in favor. Motion carried unanimously. Mayor Sweeney closed the public hearing at 7:25 p.m. Page 5 of 13 City of Centerville August 13, 2003 Council Meeting Minutes Motion was made bv Council Member Paar and seconded bv Mayor Sweeney to approve the final plat conditioned upon approval from Metropolitan Council and the execution of the developer's 821"eement. Council Member Capra asked if Mayor Sweeney was building any homes in there. Mayor Sweeney indicated he was not. VOTE: Ayes - 2. Nays - 2 (CapralLee). Motion failed. Mayor Sweeney indicated this would be heard before a full Council at the next meeting. Vll. NEW BUSINESS 1. Mr. Dave Kilian 1695 Sorel Street (Site Plan Review) Ms. Moore-Sykes indicated that Mr. Kilian had gone before the Planning and Zoning Commission for site plan approval to construct two garages and the Commission recommended approval of the plan as presented. Mayor Sweeney asked the square footage size of the structures. Ms. Moore-Sykes indicated that the one structure had remained the same size but the other had been expanded to 22x24 since the Commission recoinmendation. Council Member Capra asked whether the request falls within the parameters of 704 square feet. Ms. Moore-Sykes indicated that Ordinance #4 allows for two accessory buildings and does not distinguish whether that is two buildings for a total of 704 square feet or two buildings each of 704 square feet. Mr. Kilian of 1695 Sorel Street addressed Council and indicated that it would cost him $2,500 more to build the buildings separately rather than as one and asked for permission to build one building. Ms. Moore-Sykes indicated that going beyond the 704 square feet would require a variance application and the hardship requirements would need to be met. . Mr. Kilian indicated he would like to build the main garage 21x33 for a total of 693 square feet and build that this year. He then said he would like to build the other building next year and asked whether that would be an issue with Council. Council agreed that the buildings could be built as planned provided that they meet the ordinance requirements. 2. Peltier Preserve - Developer's Agreement Page 6 of 13 City of Centerville August 13, 2003 Council Meeting Minutes Mr. Dave Gonyea addressed Council and indicated that the issue with regard to early payment of assessments had been resolved with the City Attorney. City Attorney Hoeft indicated that he had discussed the issue with Mr. Eilertson and determined that any lost interest would be negligible as the City can call the bonds after only one year. Council Member Capra asked whether Council could discuss reconsidering the park land dedication. Mayor Sweeney indicated that he is of the opinion that a decision was made and he would prefer to discuss the matter before a full Council. Council Member Lee indicated he received calls from residents in the area and they believed they were promised that piece of land for park land and are disheartened by Council's previous decision. Council Member Capra indicated she has petitions of residents there stating that they wanted park property and that was decided by the previous council December 19, 2002. Council Member Paar indicated that he had asked to have this added to the agenda because he would like to reconsider his vote now that he has all the facts. He then explained that he had only the information on potential liability and costs for maintenance, as well as issues for the owner of the parcel it adjoins, for the parkland and was not aware that the previous Council had promised the residents a park within the development. He further commented that now that he knows all of the information and debate leading up to the decision by the previous Council to give residents that land as parkland, he would like to change his vote. City Attorney Hoeft indicated that a Council Member voting in the majority for the motion previously approved could make a motion to reconsider the decision regarding the designation of the area shown as drainage and utility easement. Council Member Lee indicated he was curious as to the hesitance to give this parkland to the residents. Mayor Sweeney indicated he could foresee maintenance and liability issues for kids going back there and he can foresee a few years down the line residents who purchase the property not realizing that was an easement for parkland and wondering why they do not have this lakeshore as part of their property. Council Member Capra commented that the property is not even attached to Lot 1. Mayor Sweeney indicated that he is looking at this as a resident who would own the property and people assume things and regardless of whether they Should be aware when they purchase the property most are not and that causes issues down the road. Council Member Lee asked for clarification on the liability issue. Page 7 of 13 City of Centerville August 13, 2003 Council Meeting Minutes City Attorney Hoeft indicated he does not see a liability issue for the City because the City will just add that piece onto its insurance. He then said it is not the City's responsibility to help someone if they misinterpret something they are purchasing. Council Member Paar indicated he had not changed his mind from pressure of residents contacting him but because he now has all the facts concerning previous Council discussions and promises and he feels it is right to provide this park to the residents because it was promised to them. Council Member Lee commented that the Park and Recreation Committee did not appreciate being left out of the loop with regard to this park issue. Motion was made bv Council Member Paar and seconded bv Council Member Capra to reconsider. Aves - 3. Navs -l(Sweenev). Motion carried. Motion was made bv Council Member Capra and seconded bv Council Member Paar to re-desimate the westerlv 50 feet of the drainaee and utility easement currentlv on Lot 1. Block 1 of Peltier Preserve as a drainaee. utility and park easement. Aves - 3. Navs -l(Sweenev). Motion carried. Motion was made bv Council Member Capra and seconded bv Council Member Lee to approve the developer's aereement for Peltier Preserve. All in favor. Motion carried unanimouslv. 3. Hunter's Crossing 2nd Addition Developers Agreement & Final Plat Mr. Rick Carlson asked that Council review with him a few aspects of the developer's agreement. He then asked that the escrow be further defined as monies that he would be reimbursed for and not monies that are applied to indirect costs. City Attorney Hoeft indicated that the word escrow means that they are monies that are ultimately reimbursed. Mr. Carlson asked that Council make accommodation for allowing model homes prior to the utilities being completed and indicated that he has four lots that would meet the 150 foot requirements. City Attorney Hoeft indicated his only concern would be that the developer agrees to have the City's engineer check the grade at that lot before the model home is constructed because final grade is not completed at that time. Mr. Carlson indicated he had no problem with that. Mr. Carlson indicated that he had included a center island with landscaping and would like to leave that out as he believes it is a maintenance problem. Council discussed it and agreed to leave the island out because it hampers snow removal and maintaining it becomes an issue. Page 8 of 13 City of Centerville August 13, 2003 Council Meeting Minutes Ms. Moore-Sykes asked how access was being provided to Lot 19. Mr. Carlson indicated that they had applied to the County for road access for Lot 19. City Attorney Hoeft indicated that the final plat could be approved subject to execution of the developers agreement. Council Member Capra indicated she had a question on the height of homes and water runoff issues. Mr. Carlson indicated the heights are similar to the first phase but the roofs are 8/12 pitch. Mr. Peterson indicated that the yards all slope to a pond. Motion was made by Council Member Lee and seconded by Council Member Capra to approve the final plat pend.in2 execution of the developer's a2reement. All in favor. Motion carried unanimously. 4. Pavement Management Plan (Tabled from Previous Meeting) Motion was made by Council Member Capra and seconded by Council Member Paar to table the Pavement Mana2ement Plan. All in favor. Motion carried unanimously. 5. 2004 North Metro Telecommunications Commission & Media Center Budgets Ms. Moore-Sykes indicated that the North Metro Cable Commission is seeking Council approval of the 2004 budgets. Mayor Sweeney indicated that the increase in budget was for the new building. Council Member Capra indicated that PEG fees should cover the bond payment. Mayor Sweeney indicated the City turned its PEG fees over for the bond payment so will not have that money available for cameras and other items. Council Member Capra indicated that the City has some monies still in that equipment fund. Motion was made by Council Member Capra and seconded by Council Member Lee to approve the 2004 North Metro Telecommunications Media Center bud2ets as presented. All in favor. Motion carried unanimously. 6. R~akofLWMottePark Mr. Palzer indicated that the ditch in the County park that is partly on the water utility, partly on City property and partly on County property needs to be repaked. Page 9 of 13 City of Centerville August 13,2003 Council Meeting Minutes Ms. Moore-Sykes indicated that the City would be splitting the.costs three ways and the City's portion would be $1,800. Motion was made by Council Member Capra and seconded by Council Member Lee to approve the repair of the culvert area at LaMotte Park at a cost not to exceed $1.800.00. All in favor. Motion carried unanimously. VllI. OLD BUSINESS 1. Ordinance #77 (Clean Up of Clandestine Drug Lab Sites and Chemical Dump Sites - Draft City Attorney Hoeft indicated that he has reviewed Ordinance #77 and will communicate his revisions to the City Clerk. Ms. Moore-Sykes indicated the police reviewed Ordinance #77. 2. Mound Trail City Attorney Hoeft reviewed the circumstances surrounding collections from.. Mr. Buechler and the paving of Mound Trail. He then indicated that Staff seeks Council direction on whether to pay to reconstruct beyond Buechler Estates into the cul-de-sac. He further indicated that Council would want Mr. Buechler to come to Council with the amounts for formal approval of the reconstruction. Council Member Capra asked whether the property owners along that street can be assessed. City Attorney Hoeft indicated that the City has not adopted the Pavement Management Plan yet but could consider assessing the property owners for the improvement. He then indicated that the amount, using the proposed calculation would be around $1,200 per property for the road reconstruction. Mr. Peterson indicated that the $54,000 includes doing the cul-de-sac. Mr. Palzer indicated that he had spoken to Mr. Drilling and he fine with that dollar amount. Motion was made by Council Member Capra and seconded by Council Member Lee to approve the reconstruction of Mound Trail based on the recommendation of the City Enlrlneer with the City's portion to cost $54.212. All in favor. Motion carried unanimously. 3. Reconsideration of Park Dedication Land Peltier Preserve This was handled as part of the discussion concerning the developer's agreement earlier in the agenda. Page 10 of 13 . . City of Centerville August 13, 2003 Council Meeting Minutes IX. ANNOUNCEMENTSIUPDATES 1. Xcel Energy Lift Station Council Member Capra indicated the trees have not been trimmed. She then asked for information on the generator. Mr. Palzer indicated he received information from one vendor and nothing from the other two. He then said that Ziegler, Inc., has several used generators available ranging in price from $10,000 to $14,000 with 5,600 to 7,500 hours all maintained through service contracts. Council Member Capra asked how much a new generator would cost. Mr. Palzer indicated a new generator would cost $25,000 to $30,000. He then indicated that in addition to the purchase price there would be a cost of $2,000 to $5,000 for hookups. Mayor Sweeney asked for something in writing concerning pricing, hours and warranty. Mr. Palzer indicated that he has doubts that the trees are causing the issue. Council Member Capra indicated she saw them working on Centerville Road cutting down branches. Council Member Lee indicated he would like City Staff to contact Xcel and ask them to trim the trees because the power takes out the lift station and that is an issue. Council Member Capra indicated she contacted Xcel and was told to call City Hall and ask City Hall to pressure Xcel to trim them because that is a secondary line and those are not a priority. Council agreed that Staff would contaCt Xcel and ask that the trees be trimmed. 2. Warming House Council Member Lee indicated it is his understanding that the Lions intend to wait until it is cooler to re-roofthe warming house. Mayor Sweeney indicated that during the festival it was noticed that there is rotting fascia on the warming house but that is not an issue if the City pays for materials it can be repaired or replaced. He then said that the intention was to re-roofthe warming house in ~ September. 3. Tri-City Meeting U~date Council Member Capra indicated that she and Council Members Paar and Lee took a bus tour of the proposed corridor and noted that Columbus Township was added. Page 11 of13 City of Centerville August 13, 2003 Council Meeting Minutes 4. Eagle Pass Update Ms. Moore-Sykes indicated that sod was laid on Portage Way and the streets have been swept. Ms. Moore-Sykes indicated she was there yesterday and they were working but there is a construction debris pile that Staff could ask them to remove by the end of the week. Council Member Capra asked whether escrow monies could be used to have the pile removed. City Attorney Hoeft indicated that they would need to be notified to remove the debris and then, if they did not do so, the City could do it and charge them. A resident indicated she is concerned because there is a six foot tall pile of dead pine trees and that is .~ fire hazard in this dry weather. Ms. Moore-Sykes indicated she would call Mr. Quigley tomorrow and ask him to remove it. Motion was made by Council Member Lee and seconded bv Council Member Paar to notify the developer to remove the debris pile containine dead trees by the end of business on Fridav. AUl!Ust 15. 2003. All in favor. Motion carried unanimouslv. The resident thanked Council Member Capra and Mr. Peterson for coming by.and talking to them. Council Member Capra indicated there are issues on Pioneer Lane and Mr. Peterson agreed to forward a letter to Mr. Quigley with regard to what needs to be done. Mr. Peterson indicated the letter already went out. 5. Other Issues Council Member Capra asked about R and R Leasing. City Attorney Hoeft indicated there would need to be an executive session at the next meeting to discuss it. Council Member Capra indicated she would like an update and discussion on the rest of the capital projects at that time. Council Member Paar indicated that the EDC is updating the new resident packets and working on plans for Snow Biz. He then said they discussed a City wide meeting concerning County Road 14 and all of the road projects going on. Page 12 of 13 ~ceipts, (])is6ursements el payro(( .Jlugust 14 tnrougn.Jlugust 22, 2003 Receipts Disbursements Payroll (8-14-03) $41,306.98 $53,987.66 $11,701.85 $60,000 $50,000 $40,000 $30,000 $20,000 $10,000 o II Receipts ~ Disbursements . Payroll :J{(YJ!E: }In upaate wif[ 6e fianrfet{ out on}lugust 27, 2003 for ~ts et CDis6ursements from}lUfJust 25 tlirOU{JIi}lugust 27, 2003. l CITY OF CENTERVILLE 08/22/0310:32 AM Page 1 Cash Receipts AUGUST 14 THRU AUGUST 22, 2003 Tran Batch Amount Date Refer Comments Name Account Descr FUND 101 GENERAL FUND Act Type G $0.29 8/14/2003 o US UR Receipt Group 01 RE 081403UT-1 G 101-11500 Accounts Receivable $9.60 8/1512003 o US UR Receipt Group 00 FIN 0815-03UT G 101-11500 Accounts Receivable $0.11 8/15/2003 o US UR Receipt Group 01 RE 0815-03UT G 101-11500 Accounts Receivable $27.14 8/1512003 o US UR Receipt Group 01 RE 0815030t G 101-11500 Accounts Receivable $0.50 8/15/2003 01932 EAGLE TRAlL- C03-06 081503 G 101-24503 Elee. Permit Surcharge $10.00 8/15/2003 01618 PELTIER LAKE DR-03- 081503 G 101-24500 Bldg. Permit Surcharge -$1.31 8/1912003 o US UR Receipt Group 01 RE 081903UTAJ G 101-11500 Accounts Receivable $0.50 8/1912003 06885 PHEASANT LANE-C03 08-19-03 G 101-24503 Elec. Permit Surcharge $0.50 8/19/2003 01814 MAIN ST - C03-064 08-1903 G 101-24503 Elec. Permit Surcharge $0.50 8/1912003 o 1686 HUNTER'S TRAIL - PO 08-19-03 G 101-24501 Plmbing Permit Surcharg $0.50 8/1912003 01812 MAIN ST - C03-063 08-1903 G 101-24503 Elee. Permit Surcharge $0.50 8/20/2003 06883 BEAVER POND WAY - 082003 G 101-24503 Elee. Permit Surcharge $0.50 8/20/2003 06875 MALLARD WAY- C03-Q 08-2003 G 101-24503 Elec. Permit Surcharge $96.50 8/20/2003 06872 DEER CT - C03-144 082003 G 101-24500 Bldg. Permit Surcharge $200.00 8/20/2003 o 6872 DEER CT - C03-144 082003 G 101-24504 Site Main. Escrow $5.00 8/2012003 06883 BEAVER POND WAY - 082003 G 101-24500 Bldg. Permit Surcharge $150.00 8/21/2003 o US UR Receipt Group 01 RE 082103-1 UT G 101-11500 Accounts Receivable $4.50 8/21/2003 01817 CENTER ST - 03-147 08-2003 G 101-24500 Bldg. Permit Surcharge $1,500.00 8/2212003 o 1760 DUPRE RD - SOD ESC 08-22-03 G 101-24505 Sod Escrow $0.50 8/22/2003 o 6878 MALLARD WAY - P03- 08-22-03 G 101-24501 Plmbing Permit Surcharg Act $2,005.83 Act Type R $662.97 8/15/2003 o 1618 PELTIER LAKE DR-03- 081503 R 101-32210 BulldlnglMech. Permits $120.00 8/15/2003 o 1932 EAGLE TRAIL- C03-06 081503 R 101-32225 Electrical Inspection $8.50 8/18/2003 o DOG TAG 02-03 #226 081803 R 101-32200 Animal Licenses $8.00 8/19/2003 o DOG TAG #227- 7173 MILL 08-19-03 R 101-32200 Animal Licenses $2.50 8/1912003 o DUPLICATE DOG LICENSE 08-19-03 R 101-32200 Animal Lieenses $1,589.10 8/19/2003 o JAN-JUN SCORE REIMBUR 08-19-03 R 101-36290 Solid Waste Reimbursem $100.00 8/1912003 o 1686 HUNTER'S TRAIL - PO 08-19-03 R 101-32180 Plumbing Permits $110.00 8/19/2003 06885 PHEASANT LANE-C03 08-19-03 R 101-32225 Elecbicallnspectlon $110.00 8/19/2003 o 1814 MAIN ST - C03-064 08-1903 R 101-32210 Building/Mech. Permits $110.00 8/1912003 o 1812 MAIN ST - C03-063 08-1903 R 101-32210 SuildlnglMech. Permits $110.00 812012003 o 6875 MALLARD WAY - C03-Q 08-2003 R 101-32225 Eleetricallnspeclion $50.00 8/20/2003 06883 BEAVER POND WAY - 082003 R 101-32225 Elecbicallnspectlon $75.00 8/20/2003 06883 BEAVER POND WAY - 082003 R 101-32210 SuildinglMech. Permits $3,124.19 8/20/2003 06872 DEER CT - C03-144 082003 R 101-32210 Building/Mech. Permits $25.00 8/20/2003 06872 DEER CT - C03-144 082003 R 101-32300 Site Maintenance Fees $3,251.31 8/2112003 o 6800 CENTERVILLE RD - G 082103 R 101-32000 Special Use/Grading/Bum $208.58 8/21/2003 01817 CENTER ST - 03-147 08-2003 R 101-32210 Bullding/Mech. Permits $80.00 8/22/2003 o 6878 MALLARD WAY - P03- 08-22-03 R 101-32180 Plumbing Permits Act $9,745.15 FUND 10 $11,750.98 FUND 415 STORM WATER IMP PROJECTS Act Type R $0.81 $100.45 $169.42 $0.05 $0.65 $143.44 $151.46 $1.36 8/14/2003 8/1412003 8/14/2003 8/1412003 8/1412003 8/1412003 8/15/2003 8/1512003 o UB Receipt Serv Pen 10 DRA 081403UT o UB Receipt Serv 10 DRAIN F 081403UT-2 o UB Receipt Serv 10 DRAIN F 081403UT o UB Receipt Serv Pen 10 ORA 081403UT-2 o UB Receipt Serv Pen 10 ORA 081403UT-1 o UB Receipt Serv 10 DRAIN F 081403UT-1 o UB Receipt Serv 10 DRAIN F 081503ut o US Receipt Serv Pen 10 DRA 081503ut R 415-32350 Storm Water Drainage Fu R 415-32350 Storm Water Drainage Fu R 415-32350 Storm Water Drainage Fu R 415-32350 Storm Water Drainage Fu R 415-32350 Storm Water Drainage Fu R 415-32350 Storm Water Drainage Fu R 415-32350 Storm Water Drainage Fu R 415-32350 Storm Water Drainage F u CITY OF CENTERVILLE 08/22/03 10:32 AM Page 2 Cash Receipts AUGUST 14 THRU AUGUST 22, 2003 Tran Batch Amount Date Refer Comment$ Name Account Descr $0.38 8/15/2003 o US Receipt Serv Pen 10 ORA 0815-03UT R 415-32350 Storm Water Drainage Fu $185.n 8/1512003 o US Receipt Serv 10 DRAIN F 0815-03UT R 415-32350 Storm Water Drainage Fu $0.10 8/18/2003 o US Receipt Serv Pen 10 ORA 081503-6 R 415-32350 Storm Water Drainage Fu $0.14 8/18/2003 o US Receipt Serv Pen 10 ORA 081503-5 R 415-32350 Storm Water Drainage Fu $100.92 8/18/2003 o US Receipt Serv 10 DRAIN F 081503-5 R 415-32350 Storm Water Drainage F u $110.79 8/18/2003 o US Receipt Serv 10 DRAIN F 081503-6 R 415-32350 Storm Water Drainage Fu $5.89 8/1912003 o US Receipt Serv Pen 10 ORA 08-1903ut R 415-32350 Storm Water Drainage Fu $57.58 8/19/2003 o US Receipt Serv 10 DRAIN F ()8..1903ut R 415-32350 Storm Water Drainage Fu $89.15 8/19/2003 o US Receipt Serv 10 DRAIN F 081903UT R 415-32350 Storm Water Drainage Fu $8.96 8/19/2003 o US Receipt Serv Pen 10 ORA 081903UT R 415-32350 Storm Water Drainage Fu $14.10 8/2012003 o US Receipt Serv 10 DRAIN F 082OO3UT R 415-32350 Storm Water Drainage Fu $200.00 8/20/2003 06872 DEER CT - C03-144 082003 R 415-34000 Chrgs for Serv. Drain $15.00 8120/2003 o US Receipt Serv 10 DRAIN F 082003-ut R 415-32350 Storm Water Drainage Fu $1.00 8/20/2003 o US Receipt Serv Pen 10 ORA 082oo3-ut R 415-32350 Storm Water Drainage Fu $1.40 8/2012003 o US Receipt Serv Pen 10 ORA 082003UT R 415-32350 Storm Water Drainage Fu $15.32 8/2112003 o US Receipt Serv 10 DRAIN F 082103UT R 415-32350 Storm Water Drainage Fu $69.51 8/21/2003 o US Receipt Serv 10 DRAIN F 082103-1UT R 415-32350 Storm Water Drainage Fu $1.79 8/2112003 o US Receipt Serv Pen 10 ORA 082103UT R 415-32350 Storm Water Drainage Fu $7.17 8/2112003 o US Receipt Serv Pen 10 ORA 082103-1UT R 415-32350 Storm Water Drainage Fu $0.95 8/2212003 o US Receipt Serv Pen 10 ORA 82203UT R 415-32350 Storm Water Drainage Fu $9.55 8/2212003 o US Receipt Serv 10 DRAIN F 82203UT R 415-32350 Storm Water Drainage Fu Act $1,463.11 FUND 41 $1,463.11 FUND 601 WATER FUND Act Type G . $19.45 811412003 o US Receipt Sure 1 SALES T 081403UT-1 G 601-20800 State Sales & Use Tax $7.19 8/15/2003 o US Receipt Sure 1 SALES T 0815-03UT G 601-20800 State Sales & Use Tax $1.88 8/19/2003 o US Receipt Sure 1 SALES T 081903UT G 601-20800 State Sales & Use Tax $3.54 8/21/2003 o US Receipt Sure 1 SALES T 0821 03-1 UT G 601-20800 State Sales & Use Tax Act $32.06 Act Type R $398.68 8/14/2003 o US Receipt Serv 1 WATER 081403UT-2 R 601-37100 Water Sales $1,184.12 8/1412003 o US Receipt Serv 1 WATER 081403UT R 601-37100 Water Sales $0.43 8/14/2003 o US Receipt Serv Pen 1 W AT 081403UT-2 R 601-37100 Water Sales $52.10 8/14/2003 o US Receipt Serv 30 WATER 081403UT-1 R 601-34400 Safe Drinking Water Fee $0.88 8/1412003 o US Receipt Serv Pen 15 WA 081403UT-1 R 601-37100 Water Sales $308.01 811412003 o US Receipt Serv 15 WATER 081403UT-1 R 601-37100 Water Sales $4.25 ---srr412003 o US Receipt Serv Pen 1 WAT 081403UT-1 R 601-37100 Water Sales $508.30 8/1412003 o US Receipt Serv 1 WATER 081403UT-1 R 601-37100 Water Sales $111.12 811412003 o US Receipt Serv 30 WATER 081403UT R 601-34400 Safe Drinking Water Fee $5.27 8/14/2003 o US Receipt Serv Pen 1 W AT 081403UT R 601-37100 Water Sales $26.05 8/1412003 o US Receipt Serv 30 WATER 081403UT-2 R 601-34400 Safe Drinking Water Fee $155.42 8/15/2003 o US Receipt Serv 30 WATER 0815-03UT R 601-34400 Safe Drinking Water Fee $0.22 8/1512003 o US Receipt Serv Pen 15 WA 0815-03UT R 601-37100 Water Sales $112.66 8/15/2003 o US Receipt Serv 15 WATER 0815-Q3UT R 601-37100 Water Sales $1.63 811512003 o US Receipt Serv Pen 1 W A T 0815-03UT R 601-37100 Water Sales $0.15 811512003 o US Receipt Serv Pen 30 WA 081503ut R 601-34400 Safe Drinking Water Fee $121.31 811512003 o US Receipt Serv 30 WATER 081503ut R 601-34400 Safe Drinking Water Fee $9.55 811512003 o US Receipt Serv P"en 1 WAT 081503ut R 601-37100 Water Sales $1,330.02 8/15/2003 o US Receipt Serv 1 WATER 081503ut R 601-37100 Water Sales $1,834.21 811512003 o US Receipt Serv 1 WATER 0815-03UT R 601-37100 Water Sales $880.19 8/18/2003 o US Receipt Serv 1 WATER 081503-5 R 601-37100 Water Sales $93.78 811812003 o US Receipt Serv 30 WATER 081503-6 R 601-34400 Safe Drinking Water Fee $0.69 811812003 o US Receipt Serv Pen 1 WAT 081503-5 R 601-37100 Water Sales CITY OF CENTERVILLE 08/22/0310:32 AM Page 3 Cash Receipts AUGUST 14 THRU AUGUST 22, 2003 Tran Batch Amount Date Refer Comments Name Account Descr $n.86 8/18/2003 o US Receipt Serv 30 WATER 081503-5 R 601-34400 Safe Drinking Water Fee $1,109.65 8/18/2003 o US Realipt Serv 1 WATER 081503-6 R 601-37100 Water Sales $1.46 8/18/2003 o US Receipt Sarv Pen 1 WAT 081503-6 R 601-37100 Water Sales $1.51 8/19/2003 o US Receipt Serv Pen 30 WA 08-1903ut R 601-34400 Safe Drinking Water Fee $208.42 8/19/2003 o US Realipt Serv 1 WATER 08-1903ut R 601-37100 Water Sales $24.01 8/19/2003 o US Receipt Sarv Pen 1 W A T 08-1903ut R 601-37100 Water Sales $4.19 8/19/2003 o US Realipt Serv Pen 30 WA 081903UT R 601-34400 Safe Drinking Water Fee $41.96 8/19/2003 o US Receipt Sarv 30 WATER 081903UT R 601-34400 Safe Drinking Water Fee $2.63 8/19/2003 o US Realipt Serv Pen 15 WA 081903UT R 601-37100 Water Sales $15.16 8/19/2003 o US Receipt Serv 30 WATER 08-1903ut R 601-34400 Safe Drinking Water Fee $26.27 8/19/2003 o US Receipt Sarv 15 WATER 081903UT R 601-37100 Water Sales $76.91 8/19/2003 o US Receipt Serv Pen 1 WAT 081903UT R 601-37100 Water Sales $751.39 8/19/2003 o US Receipt Serv 1 WATER 081903UT R 601-37100 Water Sales $0.47 8/20/2003 o US Receipt Serv Pen 30 WA 082003UT R 601-34400 Safe Drinking Water Fee $44.82 8/20/2003 o US Receipt Sarv 1 WATER 082003UT R 601-37100 Water Sales $290.00 8/20/2003 06872 DEER CT - C03-144 082003 R 601-34600 Water Meter Charges $4.48 8/20/2003 o US Receipt Serv Pen 1 W AT 082003UT R 601-37100 Water Sales $4.74 8/20/2003 o US Receipt Sarv 30 WATER 082003UT R 601-34400 Safe Drinking Water Fee $1,500.00 8/20/2003 06872 DEER CT - C03-144 082003 R 601-37150 Water ConnecUReconnec $1.17 8/21/2003 o US Receipt Serv Pen 30 WA 082103UT R 601-34400 Safe Drinking Water Fee $20.20 8/21/2003 o US Realipt Serv Pen 1 WAT 082103UT R 601-37100 Water Sales $44.60 8/21/2003 o US Receipt Serv 30 WATER 0821 03-1 UT R 601-34400 Safe Drinking Water Fee $49.45 8/21/2003 o US Realipt Serv 15 WATER 082103-1UT R 601-37100 Water Sales $169.85 8/21/2003 o US Receipt Sarv 1 WATER 082103UT R 601-37100 Water Sales $4.95 8/21/2003 o US Realipt Serv Pen 15 WA 082103-1UT R 601-37100 Water Sales $600.43 8/21/2003 o US Receipt Sarv 1 WATER 082103-1UT R 601-37100 Water Sales $11.64 8/21/2003 o UB Receipt Sarv 30 WATER 082103UT R 601-34400 Safe Drinking Water Fee $62.46 8/21/2003 o US Receipt Serv Pen 1 WAT 082103-1UT R 601-37100 Water Sales $4.45 8/21/2003 o US Receipt Sarv Pen 30 WA 0821 03-1 UT R 601-34400 Safe Drinking Water Fee $2.55 8/2212003 o US Realipt Serv Pen 1 WAT 82203UT R 601-37100 Water Sales $0.52 8/22/2003 o US Receipt Sarv Pen 30 WA 82203UT R 601-34400 Safe Drinking Water Fee $25.50 8/2212003 o UB Receipt Serv 1 WATER 82203UT R 601-37100 Water Sales $5.21 8/22/2003 o US Receipt Serv 30 WATER 82203UT R 601-34400 Safe Drinking Water Fee Act $12,327.95 FUND 60 $12,360.01 FUND 602 SEWER FUND Act Type G $1,262.25 8/20/2003 o 6872 DEER CT - C03-144 082003 G 602-20801 Service Availability Charg Act $1,262.25 Act Type R $0.45 8/14(2003 o US Receipt Sarv Pen 18 SE 081403UT-1 R 602-37200 Sewer Sales $1,666.75 8f14/2003 o US Receipt Serv 6 SEWER 081403UT R 602-37200 Sewer Sales $8.55 8/14/2003 o US Receipt Sarv Pen 6 SEW 081403UT R 602-37200 Sewer Sales $935.40 8f14/2003 o US Realipt Serv 6 SEWER 081403UT-2 R 602-37200 Sawer Sales $543.45 8f14/2003 o US Receipt Sarv 18 SEWER 081403UT-1 R 602-37200 Sewer Sales $5.82 8114/2003 o US Realipt Serv Pen 6 SEW 081403UT-1 R 602-37200 Sewer Sales $862.27 8/14/2003 o US Receipt Serv 6 SEWER 081403UT-1 R 602-37200 Sewer Sales $0.45 8114(2003 o US Receipt Sarv Pen 6 SEW 081403UT-2 R 602-37200 Sewer Sales $18.70 8f15/2003 o US Realipt Serv Pen 6 SEW 081503ut R 602-37200 Sewer Sales $102.45 8f15/2003 '0 US Receipt Serv 18 SEWER 0815-03UT R 602-37200 Sewer Sales $0.45 8/15/2003 o US Realipt Serv Pen 18 SE 0815-03UT R 602-37200 Sewer Sales $2.11 8/15/2003 o US Receipt Serv Pen 6 SEW 0815-03UT R 602-37200 Sewer Sales $1,719.10 8f1512003 o US Receipt Sarv 6 SEWER 0815-03UT R 602-37200 Sewer Sales $1,522.65 8/15/2003 o US Receipt Sarv 6 SEWER 081503ut R 602-37200 Sewer Sales CITY OF CENTERVILLE 08/22/03 10:32 AM Page 4 Cash Receipts AUGUST 14 THRU AUGUST 22, 2003 Tran Batch Amount Date Refer Comments Name Account Descr $1.05 8/1812003 o US Receipt Serv Pen 6 SEW 081503-6 R 602-37200 Sewer Sales $1.29 8/1812003 o US Receipt Serv Pen 6 SEW 081503-5 R 602-37200 Sewer Sales $1.037.52 8/18/2003 o US Receipt Serv 6 SEWER 081503-6 R 602-37200 Sewer Sales $990.12 8/1812003 o US Receipt Serv 6 SEWER 081503-5 R 602-37200 Sewer Sales $59.n 8/1912003 o US Receipt Serv Pen 6 SEW 08-1903ut R 602-37200 Sewer Sales $88.19 8/1912003 o US Receipt Serv Pen 6 SEW 081903UT R 602-37200 Sewer Sales $573.76 8/1912003 o US Receipt Serv 6 SEWER 08-1903ut R 602-37200 Sewer Sales $4.45 8/19/2003 o US Receipt Serv Pen 18 SE 081903UT R 602-37200 Sewer Sales $44.55 8/19/2003 o US Receipt Serv 18 SEWER 081903UT R 602-37200 Sewer Sales $873.21 8/19/2003 o US Receipt Serv 6 SewER 081903UT R 602-37200 Sewer Sales $1.31 8/19/2003 o US Receipt Serv 6 SEWER 081903UTAJ R 602-37200 Sewer Sales $13.80 8/2012003 o US Receipt Serv Pen 6 SEW 082003UT R 602-37200 Sewer Sales $138.10 8/20/2003 o US Receipt Serv 6 SEWER 082003UT R 602-37200 Sewer Sales $9.80 8/2012003 o US Receipt Serv Pen 6 SEW 082003-ut R 602-37200 Sewer Sales $2.000.00 8/20/2003 06872 DEER CT - C03-144 082003 R 602-37250 Sewer ConnectlReconnec $12.75 8/20/2003 06872 DEER CT - C03-144 082003 R 602-34700 SAC Charges $147.00 8120/2003 o US Receipt Serv 6 SewER 082OO3-ut R 602-37200 Sewer Sales $66.70 8/2112003 o US Receipt Serv Pen 6 SEW 082103-1 UT R 602-37200 Sewer Sales $644.04 812112003 o US Receipt Serv 6 SEWER 082103-1UT R 602-37200 Sewer Sales $89.10 8/21/2003 o US Receipt Serv 18 SEWER 082103-1 UT R 602-37200 Sewer Sales $18.24 8121/2003 o US Receipt Serv Pen 6 SEW 082103UT R 602-37200 Sewer Sales $8.90 8121/2003 o US Receipt Serv Pen 18 SE 0821 03-1 UT R 602-37200 Sewer Sales $155.48 8/2112003 o US Receipt Serv 6 SEWER 082103UT R 602-37200 Sewer Sales $93.55 812212003 o US Receipt Serv 6 SewER 82203UT R 602-37200 Sewer Sales $9.35 8/2212003 o US Receipt Serv Pen 6 SEW 82203UT R 602-37200 Sewer Sales Act $14,470.63 "- FUND 60 $15,732.88 $41,306.98 FILTER: (([Period] in(8) and [Act Year] = '2003') and [Tran Nbr] in(1 0,13)) and (((((((((((Not [Tran Date]=#8/4/2003#))) AND ((Not [Tran Date]=#7/31/2003#))) AND ((Not [Tran Date]=#8/5/2003#))) AND ((Not [Tran Date]=#8/6/2003#))) AND ((Not [Tran Date]=#8/11/2003#))) AND ((Not [Tran Date]=#8/1212003#))) AND ((Not [Tran Date]=#8/13/2003#))) AND ((Not [Tran Date]=#8/1/2003#))) AND ((Not [Tran Date]=#817/2003#))) CITY OF CENTERVILLE 08/22/03 10:30 AM Page 1 *Check Summary Register@ AUGUST 2003 Name Check Date Check Amt 10100 MAIN STREET BANK Paid Chk# 018366 10,000 LAKES CHAPTER OF ICC 8/2212003 Paid Chk# 018367 AMERICAN ENGINEERING TESTI 8/2212003 Paid Chk# 018368 GOLDENGATE INTERNET SERVI 8/2212003 Paid Chk# 018369 GONYEA DEVELOPMENT, LLC 8/2212003 Paid Chk# 018370 INTEGRA HOMES 8/2212003 Paid Chk# 018371 INTERNATIONAL UNION OF OPE 8/22/2003 Paid Chk# 018372 METRO SALES INCORPORATED 8/2212003 Paid Chk# 018373 MINNEGASCO. 8/2212003 Paid Chk# 018374 MN DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH 8/22/2003 Paid Chk# 018375 NORTHLAND SECURITIES 8/2212003 Paid Chk# 018376 PETER MELBY 8/22/2003 Paid Chk# 0183n PRESS PUBLICATIONS 8/2212003 Paid Chk# 018378 QWEST 8/22/2003 Paid Chk# 018379 SWEENEY, KRIS 8/2212003 Paid Chk# 018380 SWIFT CONSTRUCTION 8/2212003 Paid Chk# 018381 TIME SAVER 8/2212003 Paid Chk# 018382 TRU GREEN - CHEM LAWN 8/22/2003 Paid Chk# 018383 U.S. BANK'" 8/2212003 Paid Chk# 018384 XCEL ENERGY 8/2212003 Total Checks FILTER: None $120.00 J. MCPHERSON & P. PALZER 10/16 $8,784.70 GEOTECHNICAL SERVICE FOR WATER $50.00 #982280 SERV THRU 9-01-03 $6,600.00 REFUND ADDN'L ESCROW $1,500.00 1741 DUPRE RD - SOD ESC REFUND $60.00 T. PETERSON & J. MCPHERSON UNI $786.00 8-15THRU 11-15MA1NTENANCEAG $142.63 1694 SOREL 8T - #9270967-SERV $1,048.00 7-1-01 THR 9-30-03 WATER TEST $930.86 PELTIER PRESERVE FINANCIAL CON $1,500.00 1782 DUPRE RD - ESCROW -INTEG $180.60 STREET & EASEMENT - COUNCIL NO $60.76 651-762-9261 - SERV THRU 9-12- $27.90 REIMBURSE FOR MILEAGE $28,500.00 1741 OJIBWAY - 02-137 $361.85 P & Z MEETING 8-5-03 $1,334.46 LAWN CARE -CITY HALL $129.87 SUPPLIES $1,870.03 7098 CENTERVILLE RD - SERV THR $53,987.66 ~'; C')0l ~~ o .... C') ~ CD o W ..J ..J ~ W I- Z W o II. o ~ (3 l- S .! C) CI) c::: ~ u CI) .c o .ll:" C) C Gl ~ .cO CJ~ .ll: liHd Be .ll:'II: lil C) .cGl CJln 'II: ~'8 Gl'C .cGl CJa. :o.~ l\lI 0 a... e :0... l\lIl\lI a..:. II) II) e e m~~~~ng~n~;~ggggg ()I; ~~~~f2~~~gllillilli~1li N COOC')OlIl)CDCDOl""~~~N~ ~ :; g ;; ~ ~ ;; ;; ;; ;; (It flHlHH~ ~ (It ~~~;Ol>>~~lOlOg~~~()I; ~ dcr;dcDcr;dd~!!2d"':"':o)cD .... Ol~l8;!l:;l:;~oii!l(lt~~~~ ~ ~ N (It .....: .....: .....: (It .....: (It (It (It (It (It .... (It (It (It (It (It .... (It C')C')C')C')C')C')C')C')C')C')C')C')C')C') 00000000000000 00000000000000 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ T-.,.-.................................,.-................,-.,.- .....................---........................................................................ CD CD CD CD CD CD CD CD CD CD CD CD CD CD Gl E III Z 3 ffi -; ~...J z< >- ~j ~~Qg~~~<uj~~ W::::l~WW:i~O::O::ciCJ)~w< z<~~ .0 .~~0::~u.~0:: ~D:~~2:~~ .~<olt~~ .o:::c W ~ W ~ ffi z ~ J:" Z <.? ~ ~ a. O::...J J: ~ 0 W::::l ~ ~-w ~ o WO::::la. ZWOui W...J o ~o<u w3:o::w 3:w Ua.CJ)~a.~a.alCJ)al...Ja.CJ)>- E w I"-~~()I;mc;lemg~~~mm ~ooooooooo........og gggggggggggggo gggggggggooggg oooooooooggooo 00000000000000 NC')""Il)COl"-~OlO"'NC')::t1l) ~~~~~~C')~~~~~M~ 1"-1"-1"-1"-1"-1"-1"-1"-1"-1"-1"-1"-1"-1"- 00000000000000 00000000000000 1"-1"-1"-1"-1"-1"-1"-1"-1"-1"-1"-1"-1"-1"- ...........,.-T""T"",.........,.-.,.-T"".....'r"""T""T"" ................'1""'"'1""'"................................,-.,.-.,.- 00000000000000 C')C')C')C')C')C')C')C')C')C')C')C')C')C') 00000000000000 00000000000000 NNNNNNNNNNNNNN Centennial Fire District Check Register 8/20/2003 The disbursements listed below are submitted by the Centennial Fire District for your approval: DATE 8/19f2003 8/1912003 8/1912003 8/1912003 8/19/2003 8/1912003 8/1912003 8/1912003 8/1912003 8/1912003 8/1912003 8/1912003 8/1912003 8/1912003 8/19/2003 8/1912003 8/1912003 8/1912003 8/1912003 8/1912003 8/19/2003 8/19/2003 8/1912003 8/1912003 8/1912003 CHECK# NAME 13906 13907 13908 13909 13910 13911 13912 13913 13914 13915 13916 13917 13918 13919 13920 13921 13922 13923 13924 13925 13926 13927 13928 13929 13930 Amoco OD Company Arthur Mohler Bauer Bunt, Inc. Citgo Petroleum Corporation Connexus Energy Emergency Apparatus Maintenance Fire Instruction & Rescue Education, Inc. FrattaDone's Hardware Lofller Business Systems Lynn Card Company Metro Fire Mid America Speciallies MInnesota State Fire Chiefs Assn. National Assoc. for Search and Rescue Orkin Exterminating Qwest Ross Industries, Inc. Smith Micro Technologies, Inc. Cameron Haapaja David Bruder . Mark's Meat Products Mid America speCialties Sam Hyden Zachary Lansing Janet Haapaja 1011 ACCOUNT 42100 - Fuel and Lube 42190 - Fire Prevention Supplies 42000 - Vehicle Maintenance 42100 - Fuel and Lube 42252 - Station 1 - Bectric 42000 - Vehicle Maintenance 42220 - Travel, Conference, School 42110 - Other Maintenance 42180 - Office Supplies 42180 - Office Supplies 42130 - Equipment Expense 42190 - Fire Prevention Supplies 42220 - Travel, Conference, School 42200 - Dues and memberships 42110 - Other Maintenance 42240 - Telephone 42190 - Fire Prevention Supplies 42130 - Equipment Expense 45010 - Safety Camp Expense 45010 - Safety Camp Expense 45010 - Safety Camp Expense 45010 - Safety Camp Expense 45010 - Safety Camp Expense 45010 - Safety Camp Expense 45010 - Safety Camp Expense T ota! AMOUNT 505.11 35.09 60.52 176.26 356.04 2, 186.50 500.00 137.81 22.63 5.00 915.57 585.75 822.00 49.00 56.23 187.90 187.44 106.02 84.00 98.58 70.00 24.00 10.00 10.00 16.99 $7,208.44 Effective 1/10/90 City ofCentervilIe Ord. #49 STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF ANOKA CITY OF CENTERVILLE ORDINANCE #49 AN ORDINANCE RELATING TO NOISE, PROVIDING FOR THE ELIMINATION AND PREVENTION OF PROHIBITED NOISE, AND IMPOSING PENALTIES FOR VIOLATION. THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CENTERVILLE DOES ORDAIN: SECTION 1. NOISES PROHIBITED. The City Council finds that within the City, certain loud, avoidable, unnatural and unnecessary noises, which under certain circumstances and conditions cOnstitute a serious threat to the health, welfare, contentment and the feeling of well-being of our residents. Excessive noise degrades the environment of the City and the City has a substantial and, in some situations, compelling interest in controlling such nois~. Subdivision 1. General Prohibition. No person shall make or cause to be made any distinctly audible, continuous, objectionable noise due to intermittence, frequency, beat, shrillness, or intensity that annoys, disturbs, injures, or endangers the comfort, repose, health, peace, safety, or welfare of any person or precludes their enjoyment of property. This general prohibition is not limited by the specific restrictio~ of the following subdivisions. Subdivision 2. Radios..Phonoe:raDhs. Pae:ine: Systems. Etc. No person shall use or operate or permit the use or operation of any radio receiving set, musical instrument, phonograph, paging system, machine, or other device for the production or reproduction of sound in violation of the noise standards set forth in Section 3, Subdivision 1. Subdivision 3. ParticiDation in Noisv Parties or Gatherine:. No person shall participate in any party or other gathering of people in violation of Section 1, subdivision 1. When a police officer determines that a gathering is creating such a violation, the Effective 1/10/90 City of Centerville Ord. #49 officer may order all persons present, other than the owner or tenant of the premises, to disperse immediately. Subdivision 4. Animals. a. Refer to Ordinance #24, Section 24.08 - Nuisances. SECTION 2. HOURLY RESTRICTION ON CERTAIN OPERATIONS Subdivision 1. Recreational Vehicles. No person shall, between the hours of 10:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m., drive or operate any mini-bike/dirt bike, snowmobile, or any other recreational vehicle not licensed for travel on public highways. Subdivision 2. Domestic Power Eauipment. No person shall operate a power lawn mower, hedge clipper, chain saw, mulcher, garden tiller, edger, drill, or other similar domestic power maintenance equipment between the hours of 10:00 ~.m. and 7:00 am. Snow removal equipment is exempt from this provision. Subdivision 3. Refuse Haulin!!. No person shall collect or remove garbage or refuse in any residential district between the hours of 10:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. Subdivision 4. Construction Activities. No person shall engage in or permit construction activities involving the use of hammers or the use of any kind of air. electric, diesel, or gas powered machine or other power equipment between the hoUI'S" of 10:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. Subdivision 5. Noise Impact Statements. The Council may require. any person applying for a change in zoning classification or a permit or license for any structure, operation, process, installation or alteration, or proj<?ct that may be considered a potential noise source to submit a noise impact statement. It shall evaluate each such statement and take its evaluation into account in approving or disapproving the license or permit applied for or the zoning change requested. Effective 1/10/90 City of Centerville Ord. #49 SECTION 3. ENFORCEMENT. Subdivision 1. Noise Level Table. No person shall cause, or permit to be caused, any source of noise in such a manner as to create a noise level exceeding the limits set forth below for the receiving land use category. Residential: Duration of Sound Less than 10 minutes Less than 2 hours Hours: 7:00 a.m. - 10:00 p.m. 75db 70db 60db 10:00 p.m. - 7:00 a.m. 60db 50db 40db More than 2 hours CommerciaIlIndustriallMixed Use: Less than 10 minutes Less than 2 hours More than 2 hours 75db 70db 60 db 70db 60db 50db The limits of the most restrictive district shall apply at the boundaries between different land use designations. The determination ofland use shall be by its zoning designation. Subdivision 2. Sounds ExemDt from Noise Level Requirements. Sounds emanating from the operation of outdoor implements, such as power lawnmowers, snowblowers, power hedge clippers, power saws, pile drivers, jackhammers, and other construction equipment, are exempt from the sound level requirements but shall observe the time restriction provisions of this subdivision Subdivision 3. ExceDtions for SDecial Events. The City Council shall have the authority, consistent with this section, to grant exceptions from the requirements of any section of this ordinance for special events. Any person seeking an exception shall file an application at City Hall with the City Clerk or his/her designee on a form prescribed by the City. The application shall state the dates during which the application is proposed, the location of the noise source and time of operation, the nature of the noise source, reasons why the exception is sought, steps to be taken to minimi7.e the noise level, and such other information as is required by the City. Effective 1/10/90 City of CenterviDe Ord. #49 The application.will be presented to the City Council for consideration and may be approved only if the City Council finds that full compliance with the requirements of the ordinance would constitute an unreasonable hardship on the applicant, on other persons, or on the community. In determining whether to grant or deny the application, the City Council shall balance the hardship to the applicant against the adverse impact on the health, safety, and welfare of the persons affected, the adverse impact on property affected, and any other adverse effects of granting the application. The application may be granted subject to conditions, including a time limit, which shall be clearly stated. If the City finds that sufficient controversy exists regarding the proposed exception to the provisions of this ordinance, a public hearing may be held on the proposed application at which all persons affected shall be given an opportunity to be heard. Subdivision 4. Exception for Emergency Work Noise created exclusively in the performance of emergency work to preserve the public health, safety, or welfare, or in the performance of emergency work necessary to restore a public' service or eliminate a public hazard shall be exempt from the provisions of this ordinance for a period not to exceed 24 hours after the work is commenced. Persons responsible for such work shall inform the police department, Building Inspector and City Administrator of the need to initiate such work or, if the work is commenced during non-business hours of the City, at the beginning of business hours of the :first business day thereafter. Any person responsible for- sUch emergency work shall take all reasonable actions to minimi7.e the amount of noise. Subdivision 5. Criminal Penalties. Every person who violates any provision of this ordinance is guilty of a misdemeanor and shall, upon conviction, be subject to a fine, imprisonment, or both, and in either case, the cost of prosecution. Each act of violation and each day a violation occurs or continues constitutes a separate offense. Effective 1/10/90 City of Centerville Ord. #49 SECTION 4. SEVERABILITY. If any provision of this ordinance or the application of any provision to a particular situation is held to be invalid by a court of competent jurisdiction, the remaining portions of the ordinance and the application of the ordinance to any other situation shall not be invalidated. Adopted by the City Council this 27th day of October, 1999. APPROVED: (Signature on File) Mayor, Tom Wilharber Attest: (Signature on File) Diane F. Ward, City Clerk Amended: May 22, 2Q02 Published in the Quad Community Press on June 11, 2002 Amended: Published in the Quad Community Press on 205416_1 Aug-26-03 Ol;06P Resource Strategies Corp. 952 513 9549 P.02 ~ MetropoUtaa Council ~ BuUdir.g CGmmun1tf.es that work August 22, 2003 Dean R. Johnson, President Resource Strategies Corporation 14001 Ridgedale Drive, Suite 300 Minnetonka. MN 55305 RE: Centerville Comprehensive PI.. AmendDlel1t 2003.;% R::,e~oPoUtaD Urban Service Area Restaging, Pheasant Marsh Dear~son: ..- On August II, 2003 the Metropolitan Council received the City's local plan amendment for restaging of the Metropolitan Urban Service Area in the Pheasant Marsh development. As I understand the proposed amendment, the city wishes to accelerate the staging of the project's 15- acre third phase from the 2006-2010 timeframe to the 2001-2005 timeframe. No significant changes in land use are involved. As we discussed in our phone conversation there is no need for fonnal Metropolitan Council review ofthis change. In reviewing the city's comprehensive plan in 1997 the Council accepted the designated 2010 urban service area and the incremental stages within it. From a regional planning perspective an of the land within the previously reviewed 2010 area is eligible for immediate development and urban services. Intermediate stages may be implemented at the city's discretion, including changes in timing within the designated 2010 planning area such as this. I have visited the site and reviewed the materials you sent and have verified this timing- staging change falls within these parameters. Therefore, the city may proceed to implement this restaging proposal. Thank you for your conscientiousness in alerting the Council to this local plan amendment. I will forward a copy of the timing-staging revisions to the Council's GIS staff so they may update their land use and Metropolitan Urban Service Area files, and I will put a copy of your submittal and this letter in the city's comprehensive plan file for future reference. Sincerely, 64 Bob Mazanec, Sector Representative - Local Assistance cc: Council Member Steffen Council Member Oeorgacas Cheryl Olsen. Referrals Coordinator Solveig Berg. GIS Specialist V:\REVIEWS\Communities\Ccnterville\Letters\Centerville 2003 CPA restaging within 2010 MUSA.doc WW'W .'i Il-tnK'IHlllt~I.'JI1.I Ml'lru II/fu IJIIt' 602 1118~ :l:lllr~l>l1 ~ll1h Stn't't 0 51 l'auL MlnnE!M<)ta 55101-1826 . (SfU! 602.1()()() . Fax 002.1550 . .~ 291-1)904 All &llI/d Oppot!unDII Em/1llll/<., .. FROM : CENT PHONE NO. : 651 429 8629 Jun. 10 2003 12:56PM P3 ervi[fe ~1857 1880 !Main Strut - Centeruilfe,!M!J.(. 55038 (65.1) 429-3232 -!F~ (651) 429.8629 June 10, 2003 1, Dale Runkle on behalf of Ground Development, agree ~ I am waiving the time period requirements per Minnesota State Statute 15:99 ~d its amendments, for the City to act on my request to advance the MUSA for the highlighted yellow portion of the attached Utility StaginglMUSA Additions (current map) PIN #.R23-31-2243-OOO1 and Final Plat for Phase ill of the Pheasant Marsh Sub-division. "f)Jh&f[L Dale Runkle Co-;2S-~ Date I --- I :c. ~IlLL.!o ~~~J +te- -hMe"~ ~ mO(~ ful- ;c.&. ~ ru();~ /lP~("ireMw.k ~ ~ c>4 5~bs~Ji4l. 'PNt~~ A.i'4 htal1 M~ ~~ ~~ \f1~ Awt~~-f. t'l:Ii sv..bs~.J..~L ~r ,..;.Ll kA.. d....k.....:......Q ~ a.1&<lU~J. ~+, Dl~. l{o~v:>e: t2.. :t: L.J ,l\ ~crt-. a.jf\JJJL ~ 0-, +. M.a.. ~~~ ~. "t- ") '. ,l ' u..Js WQo.,l a (?O<J+ ~ ldD ~ ~\)~ ~~: (l.It/LI~~. ~~~. (p-~-03. 00 Y'/Lv~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ pi--~ ... FROM : CENT PHONE NO. : 651 429 8629 Jun. 10 2003 12: 58PM P7 - " tervi[[e '&-tafJ[isfid 11J57 u;so"%zi:n. Street . CenteT'rJiltt, M:J( 55038 {G51} 42.9..3232 . !Ill;(. (G51) 429.8629 CITY OF CENTERVILLE APPLICATION FOR FINAL PLAT DATE PAID: STREET LOCATION OF PROPERTY: LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY: C:iu.+JtJt- ~ \j)A~ 1f}4A<;.h ;;Ild. A /)D,.110;"/ SIZE OF PARCEL (8): J tJ. q I f).6l1&l t: (J'J'. S ''''jk ~ I ~ l../s J PROPERTYOWNER: (;fltJul1J 7)~f~~ t)Jt!. PHONE#: 1~3-Stfh -;;J.t./JSex. II FEE OWNER: GlUJtJnd l)~d/~WIt1..d,~ 01L . ADDRESS: 7S'')S'" ~"u.... V",llo7 141. r;." /J,.,. tJcJ!-t7 J n'lAl .<<;t/:Xt- APPLICANTS INTEREST IN PROPERTY: V FEE OWNER LEASE HOLDER CONTRACT PURCHASER OPTION TO PURCHASE ,- REASON FOR REQUEST: Nt;i2ii1AL p~~ 1-" t1nu/~1L+' /fL, L-ItA- I ij)~~2 &1f~uz~;:;;'''+- IVk~.;:~L ~ L-76 .J;.Alb. f)hPJ~il!~-+- ~rM;;;ev By paying the abo'lC stated fee. I 11I1derstaJJd that no refUnds will be issw::d in run or . '_W~ ~ .UJ ~ ~ Signature of Applicant Signature of property owner -~ t -.A"-Q~ Date . FROM : CENT PHONE NO. : 651 429 8629 Jun. 10 2003 12:58PM P8 .tervi[[e TstaEEisfieti 18..CJ7 1880 qv{airz Street . L~lltefTliJ[e, !M9{ 55038 (fiSt) 429-3232 · !falL (651) 429-8629 CITY OF CENTERVILLE APPLICA nON FOR COMPRE'RE'N'SIVE PLAN AMENDMENT Anyadditionw costs incmred for DATE PAID: FEE: $3.1 50.00 + Engineeriog.legat fuss. pubIica1ion or otber~. STREET LOCATION OF PROPERTY; ~J- lit ~~.I- LI'#. a. . u",.1t ? })qp/L1L Rd.)' LEGALDESCRIPTIONOFP~OPERTY: .~ ~(.LHo'f- ~ PM~.f- /VJkJ2t;h .:J.tvl A-dA J:i 0" _ _ _ __ SIZE OF PARCEL (S): 11./0 9/ ~ ~rr -s/kjJe... hm.j Lu/:s PROPERTY OWNER.: tPllbi.JlJd Df.:3lJuf~WIt~ :btt'- PHONE #; 7fo~- 511"- :Jk'J..~ ex 1/ FEE OWNER: c./lIJtJ" d. 1'u::Ilf-/'" I'UTitOM.J. ..Q) L . . I '" ADDRESS: 75?S- (f!,n/.kwlkJ1e7 RJ. afJ Irla,,! tJeJ.I'J .W] 591).7- APPliCANTS INTEREST IN PROPERTY: ~ FEE OWNER CONTRACT PURCHASER LEASE. HOLDER OPTION TO PURCHASE ~:S~}lt~t~~~:~~ ZONING DISTRICT: 9..,1.. f,....~ PROPOSED UNITS; .jlr' By paying the above stated fee. I understand that no refunds will at any time, even if~ ~Gf)~ Signature of Applica.nt .;> Signature of property owner I c..-~",Oy Date tervi1{e 'Esta6lisftetf 1857 STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF ANOKA CITY OJ' CENTERVILLE NOTICE OF }ltrBUC HEARING COMPluurEl~SIVE PLAN AMENDMENT ADVANCING THE DEVELOPMENT STAGINGIDATE FOR ANTICIPATED DEVEWPMENT (MUSA) FROM 2006 - 2010 TO 2001 - 2005 & FINAL PLAT ASSOCIATED WITH THE PROPOSED PHEASANT MARSH PHASE ill SUB-DIVISION NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, that the City Council of the City of Centerville will consider Ground Development's request to advance the development staginglMUSA from 2006 - 2010 to 200 1 - 2005 and final plat associated with the proposed Pheasant Marsh Phase m Subdivision (Outlot B, Pheasant Marsh 2nd Addition - 14.91 + Acres). The meeting will be held on Wednesday, August 13, 2003 commencing at 6:30 p.rn. or shortly thereafter. The meeting will be held in Council Chambers at City Hall, 1880 Main Street. ' All persons interested are invited to attend and to be heard orally or in writing. You may contact the City Clerk's office at (651) 429-3232 or by facsimile (651) 429-8629 if you need additional information. If you desire, you may e-mail: kSykes@centervillemn.com or tbender@centervillemn.com with questions or concerns. This notice is also available on the City's web site: www.centervillemn.com. City Hall is ADA accessible. Requests for hearing assisted devices or a sign language --interpreter must be'received prior to 4:00 p.rn., AugUst 8-, 2003. July 21, 2003 Teresa Bender, City Clerk Published in the Quad Community Press July 29 and August 5, 2003 Utility Staging / MUSA Additions Figure 12-B ~ / / I i I I / ~ o , 0.25 0.5 , Miles ~;R ' Plan Amendmen12001-i: MUSAchanges ~ 2006-2010 to 2001-2005 MUSA change ~ 2001-2005 to 2006-2010 MUSA change <! \ \ ;> ( .- I \. \ .~- . D Current MUSA ~ 1996-2000 Addition Nt ParklRecreation Areas . '\."~~("":"i . . '\,<:,<;, 2001-2005 Addition ",,-:"::"'''':L:''J ResolIrt:e Strategies Corporation June 2001 J ~ '. t' .' Wetlands r-:-:"':-:-j Floodplain ,....-....... ~ 2006-2010 Addition ;'97,( 2011-2020 Addition ,~:t~"'f--":':-2 43 FROM : CENT Minnesota Statutes 2002. 15.99 PHONE NO. 651 429 8629 Jun. 1121 21211213 12:56PM P4 Page 1 of2 Minn~ta StatUtes .2002, Table of ChaPters I~le of contents for Chapter ~? 15.99 ~ deaAHge ~or ag8Dcy act.:I.on. Subdivision 1. Def'.1.n1.Uon. For plttposes of this section, "agency" means a department, agency, board, commission, or other group in the executive branch of state gove.rnrnent; a statutory or home rule charter citt, county, town, or school district; any metropolitan agency or regional entity; and any other political subdivision of the state. subd. 2. O4Iadline ~ox.- .J:8sponse. Except as otherwise provided in this section and notwithstanding any other law to the contrary, an agency must approve or deny wi.th1n 60 days a written request relating to zoning, septic systems, or e~ans1on of the metropolitan urban service area for a pe~t, license, or other governmental approval of an action. Failure of an agency to deny a request within 60 days is approval of the request. If an agency dEUl.ies the request, it must state in writing' the reasons for the denial at the time that it denies the request. sUbd. 3. ApplicaUon; ezbmSious. (a) The time limit in subdivision 2 begins upon the agency's receipt of a written request containing all info.nna.tion required. by law or by a previous1y adopted rule, ordinance, or policy of the agency. If an agency receives ~ written request that does not contain all required info~tion, the 60~ay limit starts over only if the agency sendsnotice.wiehin ten business days of receipt of the request telling the requester what info~tion is missing. (b) If an action relating to zoning, septic systems, or expansion of the ~etropolitan urban service area requires the approval of more than one state agency in the executive branch, the 60-day period in subdivision 2 begins to run for all egeoutive branch agencies on the day a request containing a!1 required information ~s received by one state agency. The agency receiving the request must forward copies to othe~ state agencies whose approval is required. J (c) An agency response meets the 60-day time 11m1t if the agelloy can doc~t' that the response was sent within 60 days of receipt of the written request. (d) The time l~t in subdivision 2 is e&tended if a state statute, federal 1aw, or court order requires a process to occur before the agency aots on the ~equest, and the time periOdS prescribed in the state statute, federal law, or court order make it impossibl.e to act on the request wi thin 60 days. In cases described in this paragraph, the deadline is extended to 60 days after completion of the last process required in the app1icable statute, law, or order. Final approyal of an agency receiving a request is not considered a process for purposes of this paragraph. (el The time limit in sul:lciivision 2 is extended if: (1) a request sub~tted to a state agency requires prio~ approval of a http://www.revisorJeg.state.mn.uslstats/15/99.htm1 6/10/2003 .FROM : CENT Minnesota Statutes 2002, 15.99 PHONE NO. 651 429 8629 Jun. 10 2003 12: 57PM P5 . Page 2 of2 federal agency; or (2) an application $uhmitted to a city, county, town, school district, me~~opolitan or regional entity, o~ other political subdivision requ1~es prior approval of a state or federal agency. In cases described in this paragraph, the deadline for agency action is extended to 60 days after the required prior approval is granted. (:1;) An agency may extend the t.iIne limit in subdivision 2 before the end of the initial 60-day period by providing written notice of the extension to the applicant. The notification must state the reasons for the ektension and its anticipated length, which may not exceed 60 days unless approved by the applicant. BIST: 1995 c 248 art 18 s 1; 1996 c 283 s 1 copyright:: 2002 by the orri.ce of Revisor of statutes, state or Minneso'ta.. http://www.revisor.leg.state.mn.uslstatsllS/99.html -' 6/10/2003 ig~ ~a: ILl? 0,,": ILt:~ Oz - '58~ z o F= o o <( o cr:: I l- I (J) cr:: <( ~ I- Z <( en <( w I D- 'HIlt i fa Ja Glf' iJ~lGi hU jUff I~'IU ..!It iJ file iUJU li1ifj~ . d) J4 !!j .JIBl ".. II G'II -si!S!'!IJu {hIjl f.sUif JihB .II J n i it J n t II I ~~ l! 1 E./l li' a I ~I 1. .!f'll..!l. ~! ~ Js a ~-B a ! f n I u I ~l I ~! ~ i 1 .J ~ll h L ~t! u l~ ~! I li~ 1 .~ ". J.au ell I i . itU 'II if if i~' I, si ~H Ii ; I ~ i I ! i I j ] f~ ! .i ~ II I II l:ll:l 'u ~~ ~ tle h ~ J! x' 'I 'D'll'lll'" lijl~ . j;jdl ~ .f fJ II f~ ja1li'li' S fil)! ~ ~;!JJf e~f 'll liU'D ~ ~ diil I i' I Ii i..!l' I J '" t I 1 fi ~l J ~ J ~ li'a ~'.!f J~ ~ -j ~ " f I~ I I ;II a U i.J i < J U · I. i I ~i ~ c5 ~. '. J; ..) ~g~ ~ ~II""\IIJnnu 1~\.jI_1 LJ("'\ IUIA' I ~ IU("'U""] LJ ~ ~ I ~~oc I ~VI...J...I'-l'-l V ...J...~(_I_J I I....)(:! v r, ...J...I ~ V ...:: v ...J I I c.. LL~ 91.181: M.8C:.I:IoOON ~ ~!! i S aO,": " II LL~~ z - " , all J ~ /:: ~ 8 frll~1 - E1 J" ::0 CJJ ili ;;; ~ a ., ~ I -p m I i~ z I n " ,....---- \ " iii "- L() 11 ~ ". II . ill~ II ~~ i h i 8 ,. S ~q ....- ;;; Z l:J I ;!i I . . 0 ~ .. i!l: ~ ~! j I- G";'C~ , I II i 3~d:1C 9 J 0 , II . 0 G) 0 <x: to ~ml :". ;;'~';f ~ 0 f j!;~ ..~ Pi ::ii!i: IT: to ~Id! ..J I P- ~~~~ _llCW' ~~U! I- !~ I ............. blla I ~ ~ L() <C '~Iii .. ~ It!;! (J) on .. -, w .. w; :~;!I ~ 0::: IT: (:>. lX) 1:11 0.. I- <x: .. Q;;; :II ~ 0 f' - .. .. ~l: 'U"'_ _ _ -.J 0 ~ .. -.J z 0:::!1 e e e e I:- ~W~~ <( - ....':o>.liiiiii.- - -, I- 0.. 10) 1:11 :J ..... 0 b,,! z ~I., :II .:! ..Il~- <x: -.J ~;~~ Cf) n If::l 4 r:.r.oo..... l ,. IlIlb2~ : I .1 0 1:11 ;;: ~il~~- <( "... :II .. 1~lt~ ..........xiii] n" I ....- r .. W .. .. ill L l!L'" J z d 101 I " ..... li;lIli -.. p:oi:o>.aoN l rL .. .. ;I~~j~ , '" !i! 1_ ....- ~ .. l1l- ~~ I - a--:---- \\ /" \ '.,II ':' I '\ I II 1 '... J 0, I 1 - " I I I -1-1 - - I I "'..IV' ~ 1 ..:rl ~ v r - Ii! I A.IU,",U'U I 9 - I I ..L1'4 y~y.:rl IC:: r-: u("'\.r] LJ ..: --'~r u 6\IUIAI\ Ld 80 ,- t- II....)<:!V" t?~J \ ..1.1 ~ v"':: v _J I J c.. 19~ I \ ~~ () i.i til I ~ .~ '" I I I l-- _.I \ ~n. " I I .( n. o. Page 1 of 1 Teresa Bender .-------.---.-...------- -.------....-.------..----:-t---..-----.- From: Jill COne [ppcomp@sherbtel.net) I ~ \~ Sent: Wednesday. July 23,20031:05 PM j~ )/\" To: Teresa Bender l' {' =~: ~. .{./~/' Teresa Bender wrote: ~~\ Dear Quad Community Press: Please pubDsh this on July 29 and August 5, 2003.Please send confinnation of the printing of this Legal and receipt of this email Thanks, Teresa 7/23/2003 Office_Address_Ust 712212003 First Name I Last Name I Address Une 1 ., City ~~~_~ Mrs. <?arl__._.. .____~~~~~r.~urrent ~er _..~8~ ~~~r street ____._'-_ Centerville__ Ms. Jane Olson or Current Owner :1801 Center street .Centerville Mr.-i Mrs. Mike----..-.---.,Cmintrymari. or"CwrentOW:1808 Center Street----- "eenterviile _.- Mr. -& Mrs. Fvlike .----~- '''--'-'Wllke or'Cu'rTerit oWner:1809 Center Street---------- 'Cerrterville -- _._..._________..._........ _.___.____..._____. .____-L..__. . ._.......___.___' !VIr. David Dixon or ___.___._;9u~~.er ____._____.1817 C~nter~ . _____..9.~nterville .,_._ Ms. Cynthia Ulshafer or Current Owner ;1825 Center Street :Centerville ._-----_._-~-_. '_.~'--~ -- --.--- - --,- -_._..._._.-----._---~_.- -...... Ms. Patricia .Evans or Current Owner : 1832 Center street :Centerville ----.--.--...-..----..-..,---...---.------- ,,-...- -....-...-. "--- Mr. & ~.rs. Ted '__"0_.' __ __:!:Iipe~~~gurre"!. ~~_. :~.833 Ce!l~er street .. _.__..._... __.:~nterville ..___._ Ms. Lonie ___________~~. _~~EY~t.or Current Own.. 11 ~ _Center street ;Centerville Mr. & Mrs. Keith ,Okan or Current Owner :1841 Center Street :Centerville Mr. & Mrs. Clifford __=~_~ifU1Z O~CUrTent 'Owner.__'1~Q. ce~~r Street -.-=~.==-igenterville _.~-= Mr. & Mrs. steve .____.....__An<<!~rt or C?urrent Owner :1858 Center street .____.___..._ ;Centerville Ms. Leann _.______._._,Unc:!q..:en ~~~urrent Owner :1859 Center street .._____..J~enterville__ Mr. Mark : Meader or Current Owner ; 1866 Center street iCenterville --~--._--,.~._.,._-.-~_.._~~.--.I.-..--. ------------_____!-.. ______ -'---'--" ----r-- Ms. Molly ._._.__.__...__.__;~o~e~~!E~rrent Owner :1874 Center street._____..!~nterville Mr. & Mrs. Brian __._...^'_.__~':i!!~~_~~..9ul'n!nt Owner :1882 Center street ._._.____._;~!1lerville_..__._ Mr. & Mrs. Timothy : Peloquin or Current Owner ! 1889 Center Street :Centerville ,.-,--'--.-~.-..------.-----.1-:--. .-.~.-.,..----..--...--.-.__.____. Mr. Walter :Mehsikomer or Current OW .1890 Center Street iCenterville -------1------ . -------~ Mr. & Mrs. Ken :Theis or Current Owner : 1901 Center Street ;Centerville .,.....------'---..----. . --.--.-----.-.- Mr. & Mrs. Cra~~L_ ._.____g~!:tis ~r Current Owner .:.1902 Qanter Street __ ._____ ;~~.!!te~iIIe ___._ Erin Conrad or Current Onwer :1909 Center street 'Centerville ---.-------..-...--.-.....-.-- .-..__._--_.~--_. -'-.-. Mr. David Lund or Current Owner !1917 Center Street ;Centerville Mr~-& MrS~'iany ---.------;S8i1or 'orCurrentOWner "--11925 'center street-.-.---.. -fcerltelville .-. -..,- c-.-------....--.-...--...-.--.... -- -----.--------,-.----- --.-...---:-.-.--- -'~'-.- Kelly Sullivan or Current Owner :1933 Center Street :Centerville '--'--'-'--~'-----'--~-"-". . ---1---' '1-.---------- Ms. Jill Branson or Current Owner \1934 Center street ;Centerville Mr. & M'rs.-RUsSeU-'----:'Reid or Current oWner -":1941 Center Street--.-----...--'Centerville .....- - ...-----t--.---~,._._- --.--+---~----------~--------- Mr. & Mrs. Blaine . Hopp or Current Owner '1949 Center street :Centerville - ~ ~"l -...~--~.._--.-,-,-_._-- Mr. & Mrs. Brian 'Hanson or Current Owner :1950 Center Street iCenterville Mr. & Mrs. David .-----.-fGrafskYor-Current ownerT1957 Center Street --"'---"---:Celltervine-'-'- -"~-"-'---',-~ '1.--.------..---~..--~----.\-.._. ...- Mr. Wayne :Rodriguez or Current Owne:1960 Center Street !Centerville ---~---~--'-"---'-'-""'---~~- .~, - ~--'-'.""r-. .-.--,-- Mr. Thomas 'Hanson or Current Owner 11965 Center Street iCenterville Mr. & Mrs. ROberi----"---'SChaefer or Current Owner':1970 Center Street -_c-~--:CenterVille -- Mr.-'& Mrs. Wayne -'_=:::=J~I~om~! curre~._~er:692?:~Y.l' cou~.__.__:~=~=:.~.-.f~~~!YiIl~'_~~~~' Mr. Harveyu_____.A<~~~ orC~rren~Owner ___~~~28 !vy_~~I:!~____._..______;9.entervill.~ _.. !VIr..~ Mrs. Loren _._._......_....EIIi!t orC~~..!'! ~er .._____1~_~~1~..~~. _____..___:9~nte~!!!~..._. Mr.-& Mrs. Danny ~'Durbin or Current Owner :6936 IvY Court' iCenterville Mr:_f~rs~ Ronald ~~~~.:.: ,~i~.~~~~~nt-6wnef~:~:-:~~. !ii.9-~u~:'_" ~~_- _:- ~'-==::~'!nte!vi"e_'.~ . "'--: ~.~_& Mrs. TrOt...... .._.____....:'=!~.~~~~~..9.!1~ent ~e~.. .1~~.I~~~urt...__ ..~..._. ........_._....j9.~nterville. .. ____ !,!!~:_~.~!:>>:_Brandon _....... .. ..;~~~.<?!..9_~_~~.0W!!~~_.. .._._~~9~Jrr_~~1:!1! ........_._._ .....:9~nte~lIIe ~.' ..' Ms. Beverly :Berg or Current Owner ,6948 Ivy Court ;Centerville ~!~ &Mrs. Mike~_=...~~~_=_-_'.corii~~ ~! Current pWi1~I1Ti~)ju~~~~.___~:._-...-.-_~-~C~!!!~ryi~e-.~:.~ Ms. Cynthia ;Beane or Current Owner :1782 Dupre Road :Centerville ..-----.-----.-.......~-.... .---.-------------------.--.---.- .~.-----.-.c -.-~.--.----.- !VIr. & Mrs. Todd .___ ._.__.~in ~~_~.urrent Own~~___._~17~1_~'::Ie.~ Roa~_.___._._.___..9~nt~rvill~____ ~!=~_~~:~~~es __ .~_..... :ttof~~!t~! o~ 9~~~9W"e }?~~~_~':IEre~o~__ ..".____ _ ..,~!1.!..~rvi.!!~ ___ I'!!~:_~~rs...!?e~~.._... ... _ .__I\I1_~si~~~ C~rre~~e _;~~.1~_Dupre Road _. __ _ __._._. :~I:'!~!Yi.~~_... Mr. & Mrs. Thomas 'French or Current Owner .6921 Dupre RoadCenterville Page 1 Offlce_Address_Ust 7/2212003 First Name Last Name Address Une 1 C' ~r. ~.~___. .. ~oI!e~p or_~u~n.!._~ 6~~ ~.~~ ~~cf.. ~l!t~'Y!~~~ Mr. ~~~_u~I... _' _ ~~~ C?rCu~~ ~!r_ _ ~~~?_l>.~~_~C?a~ . ~.r1t~_~I.I!. _ Mr. &_.~~~.~~rry. ~~~~C?.rCu!!8I1t..~~r .~~~_l?up~~o_l!~ ..__ .~rrt.~~!!~._ !VIr~.~_ ~rs. _T~~ :91~~or~~~~ ~!~. _.~~!?~P.!E!.R:~~~ __ .._ _..~~!rvil~~. .. .._ . Mr~.~. ~~.: ~~p~ QId.~~J~ or Cu~~.~ ~~~ ~~~.t:I.ollo,,!__ 'H'. _~~!IYi~~.. IVIs.:.~~~~!'__~~~_c>.r.9~.~n.t.~~r.__~8~~ ~~.':I~.t!C?~0~_. '" . ~~~~~.~~!e ~~:.~~.__ "'!C?!~~Y-F.l~~rt..~E9u~~__.~~~_GI"!'-~~ ~ollow . ..._..~.~~~!?.._ ~~. __ ". _.__ Bu~de~. C?r 9u!"'8~ _~~~. }~~76~.~~~.r.c! ~~'! .__._. . __ ~nterville. "_.. ~~.. . . ... . .~u.i1de~ C?r C:lJr:n.!~. ~~r .~?~ ~al!~~ '!'..~y : Centerville Mr. Fredrick Curran or Current Owner 6907 Oak Circle - - 'CerlteiVilie .-- ~",'._"--'-,--'~_. ". -.... ,.." . -._........-..___._~ -.....-... ._~"....._....._.,..~_..__~_._ . ".-,0' ____.__._....__..__._.. ~~. Dayid ..... .___.. _. _~'=-<?~ .<?f. ~1!e.~.9Wn~~ .. _.~~~08Q~! Circl~. ___ ____. ,_.__ :~nte~~lIe "_ ,._. eny iFuhrmeister or Current Ow .6913 Oak Circle ,Centerville Mr. & Mii:Greg'" --.-..----!N~ham or-Current Owne '691'aOak Ciroie'-- _'_..M" '----ieerrterville-'-'" .-------- -..---.- "..~. . --.-------.,--.-----.......- ---........-1------.----.- r. Bill :Michael or Current Owner :6923 Oak Circle :Centerville ~r. & MrisCOtt"~':~': --_.~..._=~:-Sears.-or~u~~. owner... --. :6926 oa~_circl~~::=~.=~~~~centerV"le- --... Pat Dahl or Current Owner '6936 Oak Circle ;Centerville ------......-...-...--..-..-..-~.-----....-------...-.i---.------.-.--, .----..... Mr. John :Lundblad or Current Owner :1737 Partridge Place iCenterville ------.-.---------~-- --- - ,..------.. .----.--1 Mr. Was :Schoebertein or Current 0 :1744 Partridge Place !Centerville ---.-.---- +-----..----1- ! _.---- .. urrent__~e~_._...__.__.___.__..11~43 Partridge_Place :Centerville __' Current _______ .... ___~OwnB!:---. ... '.'_'. ........_.__.;1747 Partridge Place ___~: iCenterville Current iOwner :1751 Partridge Place iCenterville . ..-.-____.__._~-.- . . ... . .-.._.__._.___1.. --+___ urrent .. . iOwner . :1754 Partridge Place. ;Centerville curren(_~.'-=--=-~=.-"'~-~==~=~~~-_-. .. _ ..' ...._-~~J755 ~artridge Place . ==-lce~erville ~:~-= Current ___ ___ __._____ :Owner_ .._.. _.. .-_ _. .._.____ j~ 759 Partridge Place ___~Centerville ..___ Current :Owner :1764 Partridge Place !Centerville -- ..--_________~___- ~.-... ..0 __. _.._.__-!_r Current : Owner '1765 Partridge Place :Centerville ~__,__,,_~'_'__'_.oJ..__.___ "_."... .."__ ..._.. '_'_'~''''_''_'' _______-L-.. Current 'Owner 11 no Partridge Place iCenterville .-~,_._---,-_____-l-__._.____..... .. _'_,.'___"~'_'_ Current : Owner i1n4 Partridge Place iCenterville .. urrent .-------..-----:OWner-.. --- -".- . '''-'~1n5 Partridge Place-h.-- !Centervill8"'-- . . ._-- ""T,---"- " . .-. -.... -......-.-... ._~ Current ._.___....__.__~..!?!.__.__._... .......______!.~n8 Parlfidge Place _-1Centerville .._ Current !Owner :1n9 Partridge Place iCenterville -.-- --------.-----...;----.-..----. . --......-. '-'-'-. .------1-- Current (Owner i6879 PheaSant Lane iCentervllle ~'. Mich-ae'-'---=~~.~~_ :J~i~im~or-2~~nf~~~~907 .Pheasant Lane .___._]~ntervilie--_. ~~~ Mr. & Mrs. Barry 'Reiland or Current Owner ;6908 Pheasant Lane iCenterville ---....---..-/-------------,. --.--------, -_...... ~~ponald . _""_' ._.___..__...:_I?~g~il'!~_~~_~~~~ Owne ~E!~.!!!:'!!...easant Lane Moo__,_ :~~~Iyille...__ ~.~:})~!!.~~____.______... __'" ~~.~~!!!~.r <?lI~~~~,~ _~~~.I!.Pheasant Lane . ,,_.___~~-~~~iIIe.. _. ~!: Rodney _._.._ "'_'__' _..X~rk ~~ Curr~~_ ~~.!_. .__ :~~23I:'heasant Lane . .__;Centerville... Mr. Kevin 'Navara or Current Owner :6926 Pheasant Lane :Centerville . ~.~__~.._~,.______ ._.~ .#... __'._~_'~.' r~ ..____ ,_.,_,__,_._,__,~__---, _____~__._.__ _.'___'. _.~." ___.., :.. _ _.____._.~ Mr. Tedd PetelSOn or Current Owner 6933 Pheasant Lane :Centerville Mr. & Mrs. Rob --.---.--.-..~__:~eph~n_lif-~~~irt-~t;r_~;~~l_~l!mac COu"!____________j~~~rville..__ Mr. Ronald iDailey or Current Owner :6908 Sumac Court :Centerville Mf.'-Michaei- ---.. . --'-~Carter'or Current-Owner------:69"13 Sumac Court--'''---'---:Centerville-'w ---,- ~--,---,-"-'. -.-. ._-~....- ~f"'".-----_____'_"'__ .__,_.._____ __._:._ .,__,_'__. __~._...._.,_...._.___--!____ ~_.~ "'P ~r. Daniel___._...._____.__)~arUnez_<?E_9~~nt ~e~~~~~~ Sumac COurt_.______;Centerville ______ Mr. & Mrs. David __........_.. . ; ~~I~ings!!?~.()~~~_f'!'!~..2!m~:6~23 ~E~~~~u,,!_,,_. ..... _.... ..._ _i~~~~~lIe . Mr. & Mrs. Joseph Steele or Current Owner :6926 Sumac Court :Centerville ...-_____~...__._.._..___.,.._.\ .___._. .__'"'-____._~__.__w.~.~,_~~.,. _......_-.__.________ ~.' ......__.___~.L_.~~~____ __". . Mr. Philip ;Bangert or Current Owner :6933 Sumac Court 'Centerville Page 3 ~ Office_Address_Ust 7/2212003 First Name. I Last Name- I Address Une 1 I Citv,. Mr. & Mrs. David_.________..: Vickers or Current Owner ;6756 Centerville Road iCenterville R & R Leasing ior Current Owner ;6806 - 20th Avenue 5., P. O. ;Centerville pround :~---_..__. iDeve/opment . --- :7575 Golden Valley Road, Su !Golden Valley Ms. Christy Stark :Metropolitan Council iMears Park Centre, 230 East ist. Paul City of Uno !Lakes 1600 Town Center Parkway IUno Lakes -- Centenniallndependent ,School District #12 ;4707 North Road iCircle Pines Ms. Maureen Devine, Div. !Property Records & Taxati :2100 Third Avenue, - IAnoka _~- Current ;Owner :6885 Pheasant Lane iCenterville Page 5 ~ ervir{e 'Esta6fisfiec{ 1857 1880 Main Street . CenterrJilIe, M9(55038 (651) 429-3232 . !Fa?( (651) 429~8629 AFFIDAVIT OF MAlLING PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE State of Minnesota) County of Anoka ) City of Centerville) I, Kris Sweeney, being first duly sworn, deposes and says: I am a United States citizen, over twenty-one (21) years of age, and the Account Clerk II of the City of Centerville, Minnesota. On July 24, 2003, acting on behalf of the said city, I deposited at the United States post office located in Hugo, Minnesota, copies of the attached notice of Public Hearing for Pheasant Marsh Phase ill Subdivision MUSA/Comprehensive piap. Amendment and Final Plat, enclosed in envelopes, with postage thereon fully prepaid, addressed to the following persons at the addresses appearing opposite their respective names: NAME ADDRESS See Attached There is delivery service by United States mail between. the place of mailing and the places so addressed. -6A4~ Kri. Sweeney, ~n Subscribed and sworn to before me this 30th day of July, 2003. TERESA BENDER NOTARY PU5UC-MlNNESOTA My Commission &piles JaR. 31, 2005 ~~~~ Notary Public --- .':::'.:~:!'<~<l'i~€~""IIi"~o!:~.o. __J 60 - -:-l -7 L._ \ \ \ \ \ \ <( C/) <C LIJ -r- _L- r-. L...!_ ......- ...J- . '., I' \ -y" (J) -y" -7' ,t.- --\ / / / PHEASANT MARSH THIRD ADDITION \c/) 60 N89"19'41"W 406.83 ~=09"19'28~\ R=20S.00 93.36- ----- _;r N00040'19DE ------;.....1 -"' I 60.00- ----:'::._ ........ 7.63oC::::~ / N89009'S3a~ ; . c5! ./,( / ;'"\~' D ;"'" _" I / ("l"-, .....,.. I / ,''j''- ..('.J ..C~/' '0 ....~ -19.80 .J d) /..., r,f') ,( 'l N00"17'Sl.W '/ ...,," ~, r_' 'T"...llo ("l" .{'/,-..1 {',' ...... "0""',, '(- A.',..J <.,' " I , ,..)' '.J I ..(' o '" N89019'41"W 406.83 479~38 NOTE: AlL MONUMENTS REQUIRED BY MINNESOTA STATUTE AND NOT SHOWN ON THIS PLAT WILL BE SET WITHIN ONE YEAR OF THE RECORDING DATE OF THIS PLAT, AND SHAlL BE EVIDENCED BY A 1/2 INCH BY 14 INCH IRON PIPE MARKED BY R.LS. NO. 12294. CITY OF CENTERVlLLE ~ -\t? COUNTY OF ANOKA 'I~q ~V ~-:~_ME1ROPmJTAN w~:: 23, T. 31, R 22 ~ - rI , - COIIIoIJSSION EASEMENT PER ~ 1/,/ ANOKA COUNTY HA1.F SEClION MAP 27823- I I I \ I \ I ~J 0 ~ c( ~,. 0 .) u: o 80 78.50 88.69 ~ g " 60 4 a'" A 2 2.", " Y> .' '....., :: "".'" " ,;.r.>.... ,. ~-~~ ,:: ..,. .~ .-' ,: --.>/ N89046'31DE 162.02 //~ N l!l I '" <D u; <D o SCAlE IN FEET 50 100 -- - --- ,~ /} 1 Inch = 50 leet DRAINAGE AND UnLITY cASeMeNTS ARc SHOWN THUS: o o o '" I I 5-1 o U TL 0 T lBO.85 III UN( OF THE sou lllE SOUlllWEST QUARTER or lllE ~~EAST QUARTER SEe. 23, T. 31, j-5 _l_J L_l_ FOR THE P~RPOSES OF THIS PLAT THE NORTH UNE OF THE SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 31. RANGE 22, ANOKA COUNTY. MINNESOTA IS ASSUMED TO HAVE A BEARING OF N89.,9'41.W. . DENOTES 1/2 INCH IRON MONUMENT FOUND o DENOTES 1/2 INCH x 14 INCH IRON MONUMENT SET, MARKED BY UCENSE NO. 12294. e DENOTES ANOKA COUNTY MONUMENT. BEING 5 FEET IN WIDTH AND ADJOINING LOT UNES, AND BEING 10 FEET IN WIDTH AND ADJOINING RIGHT OF WAY UNES, UNLESS OTHERWISE SHOWN ON THE PLAT. -7 L._ lCl () --: - C'l' -- I"l 1-- ~ -- . C:J C'l N C:J i-') - <( 0 0 0 z 1-- C/) l:J:::: LI_ -r- _L- C/) l:J:::: <( ""'- > ....- 1-- -7 L._ <( C/) <( LIJ -r-' _L- r-. L...!_ 150 ~AMES R. HILL INC. SHEET 2 OF :I SHEE18 PHEASANT MARSH THIRD ADDITION CITY OF CENTEflVlLLE COUNTY OF ANOKA SEC. 23, T, 31, R. 22 KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS: That Ground Development, Inc., a Minnesota corpomtion, fee owner of the fonowing described property, situated in the County of Anoka, State of Minnesota, to-wit Outlot B, PHEASANT MARSH SECOND ADDmON, according to the recorded plat thereof: Anoka County, Minnesota. Has caused the same to be smveyed and platted as PHEASANT MARSH TIllRD ADDmON and does hereby dedicate to the public, for pub1ic use forever, the lanes, place and way and also dedicates the drainage aod utility easements as shown on the plat. In witness whereof said Ground Development, Inc., has caused these presents to be signed by its proper officer this ------.:... day of . 2003. GROUND DEVELOPMENT, INC. I hereby certifY that I have swveyed and platted the property described on this plat as PHEASANT MARSH TIllRD ADDmON; that this plat is a correct representation of the smvey; that all distances are conectIy shown on the plat in feet and hundredths of a foot; that all monuments will be com:ctly placed in the groumi as designated within one year after the recording date of this plat; that the outside bolllldaJy lines are correct1y desigoated on the plat; and that there are no wet Iands as defined in Minnesota Statutes 505.02, Subdivision I, or public highways to be designated on said plat other than as shown. Harold C. Peterson, Land Surveyor, License No. 12294 STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF By as The foregoing Surveyor's Certificate was acknowledged before me this _ day of by Harold C. Peterson, Minnesota License No. 12294. ,2003, STATEOFMlNNESOTA COUNTY OF Notary Public, County, Minnesota My Commission Expires: January 31, 2005 The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this _ day of . 2003, by . as of Ground Development, Inc., a Minnesota corpomtion, on behalf of the corpomtion. CITY OF CENTERVll.LE Notary Public, We hereby certify that the City Council of the City of Centerville, Anoka County, Minnesota, duly accepted and approved the plat of PHEASANT MARSH TIllRD ADDmON at a. regular meeting held this _ day of , 2003. If appli~le, the written comments and recommendations of the Commissioner of Tmnsportation and the County Highway Engineer have been received by the city or the prescnlled 30 day period has elapsed without sueh comments and recommendations, as provided by Minn. Statutes, Section 505.Q3, Subd. 2 County, Minnesota My Commission Expires: January 31, 2005 By By Clerk Mayor Cheeked and approved this _ day of ,2003. By Anoka County Surveyor "'AMES R. HILL INC. SHEET 1 OF 2 SHEETS August 6, 2003 Mr. Bob Mazanec, Sector Representative REsoURCE Metropolitan Council STRATEGIES _,M~ Park Centre Co ~.Pe6"F1flh St. E. RPORATION S1. Paul, MN 55]01 14001 RIDGEDAlE DRIVE SUITE 300 MINNfTONKA, MN 55305 612/513.9548 FAX 612/513-9549 952 new area code o !II RE: Centerville Comprehensive Plan Amendment 2003-2 ?>E>b Dear~ec: Enclosed are maps illustrating the proposed amendment to the City of Centerville's Comprehensive Plan. The amendment proposes the restaging of an approximately IS-acre site from the City's 20Q6-20IO MUSA Addition Stage to the City's 2001-2005 MUSA Additioii Stage. The site constitutes the third and final development phase of the Pheasant Marsh residential development, owned by Growd Development, Inc. Per our telephone conveI$ltion on'.t\ugust 5, the proposed sewer staging amendment is part of thepMe~Jitan Council's approved 2010 MUSA and should not require Metropolltan.Couiu,;ilreview nor dOes it necessitate any formal plan amendment process. As the plan amendment and map preparation were already in progress when we spoke'aDout this matter, I am happy to provide you with these maps for your reco$~d to keep you abreast of changes to the City of Centerville's Comprehensive Plan, IWQUld appreciate your written confinnation that no formal plan. review by the Metropolitan. Council is necessary or that the Council waives formal review of this amendment. Thank you for your assistance in this matter. Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions or if you would like!o discuss this fu,rther. Sincerely, ,~~ Dean R. Johnson President EneL , CC: /Kim Moore-Sykes, City Administrator Dale Runkle, Ground Development, Inc. Growth Management Plan Figure Il-D ~, //"" '...~ / o 0.25 Miles 0.5 . '. ( Plan Amendment 2003-2: Location (No land use change) \ LowJMedium Density :;;;;.~};; High Density Residential III . Commercial ... Industria1 .. Publk/Semi-Public ~ ~ CBD/Mi...ed Use III City Parks )~;'F: Regional Park Prese1ve \ \ \ \ ""- II -- - '''-- 1~ , III Wetlands r:.:.....;.:l Floodpt..'- .............. IJ.ilIJI - - Proposed Trails c= = Proposed Collectors ;g Cny HaD .. Church !lit Fire Department .Ii School N1 Resource S1ra1egillll Corporation August 2003 . / .-// 40 Utility Staging / MUSA Additions Figure 12-D ...--- / '" i I i I I ~ .~ o 0.25 Mil~ 0.5 , \ \, '> " r6l1 Plan Amendment 2003-2: MUSA changes ~ 2006-2010 to 2001-2005 MUSA change < J ~rL .':terv~ 'EsftdiBdid 1/61 D Current MUSA ParkJRecreation Areas ~ 1996-2000 Addition ::~;:;~;~: 2001-2005 Addition .:.J'....::.::..r.:.2:J ~ 2006-2010 Addition ~ 2011-2020 Addition Nt \ " " . Wetlands r':yr-:"! Floodplain :::::.:.:~:::: Resource Strategies Corporation August 2003 43 IlIl ervi{[e (Estaflisnecf 1&57 1880 !Main Street . Cente1'lJi1le, 9vftX. 55038 (651) 429-3232 . !laiC (651) 429-8629 STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF ANOKA CITY OF CENTERVILLE RESOLUTION #03 - 043 A RESOLUTION ORDERING AND PREPARATION OF PLANS WHEREAS, pursuant to Resolution (#03-042) of the council adopted July 23, 2003, fixed a date for a council hearing on the proposed improvements associated with the Hunters Crossing 2nd Addition Subdivision and near by benefiting properties (6882 Centerville Road, Outlot B - Ground Development and 6849 Centerville Road) and this report was received by the council on July 23, 2003; and, WHEREAS, ten days' mailed notice and two weeks' published notice of the hearing was given, and the hearing was held thereon on the 2Th day of August, 2003 at which all persons desiring to be heard were given an opportunity to be heard thereon, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCll.. OF THE CITY OF -- . CENTERVILLE, MINNESOTA: 1. Such improvement is necessary, cost-effective, and feasible as detailed in the feasibility report. Such improvement is hereby orde,red as proposed in the council resolution adopted on the 23M day of July, 2003. Bonestroo, Anderlik & Associates is hereby designated as the engineer for this improvement. The engineer shall prepare plans and specifications for the making of such improvement. The city council declares its official intent to reimburse itself for the costs of the improvement from the proceeds of the tax exempt bond. 2. 3. 4. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City ofCenterville this 27th day of August, 2003. Mayor, Terry Sweeney Attest: City Clerk, Teresa Bender CITY OF CENTERVILLE NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ON THE PROPOSED MUNICIPAL UTILITIES AND STREET IMPROVEMENTS FOR THE HUNTERS CROSSING ~ ADDITION, PHASE I SUBDMSION AND BENEFITING PROPERTIES (6882 & 6849 CENTERVILLE ROAD AND OUTLOT B OWNED BY GROUND DEVEWPMENT) NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, that the City Council of the City of Centerville will meet on Wednesday, August 27,2003 at the Centerville City Hall, 1880 Main Street, in the Council Chambers beginning at 6:30 p.m or shortly thereafter to consider, and possibly adopt the proposed assessment for the municipal utilities and street improvements within the plat known as Hunters Crossing ')!1d Addition, Phase I and a portion of Centervi11e Road and Outlot B owned by Ground Development. Adoption by .the Council of the proposed assessment may occur at the hearing. The following are the property identification numbers to be assessed: . PID# ADDRESS 23-31-22-33-0004 23-31-22-34-0003 OutlotB Lot 19 Hunters Crossing -r Addition, Phase I 6849 Centerville Road 6882 Centerville Road (Ground Development) (Richard S. Carlson & Assoc.) (Richard S. Carlson & Assoc.) The proposed assessment roll is on file for public inspection at the City Clerk's Office. The improvement project was considered at a hearing on July 23, 2003. The total estimated project cost is $1,282,925 of which 1,244,134 is proposed to be assessed against Richard S. Carlson & Assoc. and $38,791 is proposed to be assessed against the other parcels. A reasonable estimate of the impact of the assessment will be available at the hearing. The City Hall is ADA accessible. Requests for hearing assistance devices or a sign language interpreter must be received before 4:00 p.m. August 22, 2003. All persons interested are invited to attend and to be heard. You may contact the City Clerk's office at (651) 429-3232 or by facsimile (651) 429- 8629 if you need additional information. If you desire, you may email: 1880 !MidnStIIet · CentenJI1k. !M!J(. 55038 Richard S. Carlson & Assoc. 7671 Central Avenue Fridley, MN 55432 (.r::3\.l. ~ AlISO~'03 \ f. 'I Il.lI. PllIIWlIl ." ,. o 0.3 7 : : '" f. H t.!ETER 1~2141 " k" iL.;r fr I~;?.~:r./ fj~~}: .; .~ ~-:,' . : I. " z' ,... . ~-'- < ""':. . l'~ '~.rt;~..::~;f~~ (. ~d' i 'tW,~,~.'~;fr/f;,>::,ftt?>i.~' .'. ! '.~.' -.i -.;Il_r '~%.. ! :.': ':(0.;' ~ .~/fW~ ~t 'z. .~:-;- c . ,? . -.' i.. terviffe ~1B57 1880 !MidnStIIet . CentenJI1k.!M!J(. 55038 Ground Development Corporation 7575 Golden Valley Road Suite #250 Golden Valley, MN 55427 llS.l'IlST_ fz ~OO.37: i " HVtErZR );Z~41 'II I'. I r r' L ,,' r.': " : -y":'?-t ":1?~.t ~.~: '.~ ., . .'. f:;;.il: !:f. ,i......',~~t!! . . -:~. -.:.". t ~:~ .~~..' .' (. ~... '. ,'. 1880 !MidnStIIet . CentenJI1k. !M!J(. 55188 Ms. Jennifer Emily & Joseph Schwartz 6882 Centervllle Road Centervllle, MN 55038 1880 MainSIrIet . Cen.tmJ//k,!M!J(. 55038 Mr. & Mrs. Tom WIlharber 6849 Centervllle Road Centervllle, MN 55038 t::~ ~/ ,. f us f'llSTmE * F ~00.37: a f! ~ .", ." .. U~ET9 15':141 11t ~-~- " i 1l.lI.l'1r.!TAGll ,.. '" .. o 0.3 7 : i * f-!~oJ~1'i~U1 'A - 'i --:':. ~f'. ~.. 't/f:":'~~' r '::,:..t~t<;", "".-;.r. ;-....: ,'-!. '~r:..;:; ~.: ~:i::.. ::.. " }.:>i: ;, .'1.... 1: ;);~;~j~J; """',..-' Ita i' 3', t:~01 /;Wfln I . '.~ '.. ~ 'F Ii ti ( [; f" , r. ~ ; 1,TJJ C'.'J;:)~, ~:tt;;,.,L i~f~f i ';~'.:.~y~~:. f ,f~! " ~ ~ .. . .\:... / S :..}.:,. ~ + :'-' ;.. ,.i..j:!.:':.: r~~~ li!l} .' ~ ':5'> . It,;". . ..., ~.:; : .' '. ;.~ . .. "'~J':- .. :-1..;'.. '::r'~F . ~.', ' :,;lff . ~..', ]:./ :- ::.~'.:)::'.' ~:~: ; -..J.':'. '..~: ;::~.~..:'; :_:. . JI,:~{':- . :. .";,)... :.:-:O:;'i"-":. t~\t .~ ;~~}:~- I .. l.-' . '. ,( , , . .... ....... I .~. 2 Oen ::l E~ o OW 0::: O:E I-Wc(W 2....J0> W....J20 aI:E5oO:::. 'W'enO:::o~C") ~enww_O CWl-enl-o Z~~C)W~ ~.<O~~~ o.>lL.ent.-" <(o:::oOen . .~~o:::~ :E(30< - en> ....J 0:::1- ~ W- ... I-:::! ..... 21- =>=> J: U)e!) a:Z W- I-U) zu) ::d~ .:r: 0 u) W o ~ W u) C ~ a:a:Z WWCi: :l~:E -~ ~ W I- Z>a: Wa:W O~~ Zu) ~ I-W Ze!) 0< a: I- !.LO o !.L ~ ::JI- 00 W....J C a: W ....J ..J u)~ u)w WI- a:Z Cw Co < a: W ..J III . W:E O::J o:::z <C 0.._ ..JI- <cZ I-W O:E I-CI) u) W u) u) < o " LO Cl C") ..... ER- CD CD ..... "it Cl Cl q " " <'l .nC")c)C\i..... ..... ..... ER- ..... C") ER- ER- ER- N. ..... ER- I I I I I co co C") C") ..... ..... u) CO ..... ..... ER- O","LOClC")O "it ER-CDC").....ClER- C") N N " CO ..... ER-u)c)~ 0 ER- ER- ER- N ER- 000 ER- 0 LO LO " r-: C")- ER- ER- o 0 ER- 0 N ai ~ ER- ER- 00" ER- LO CO " LO cr; as ER- ER- o 0 0 CO o ER- 0 CO ..... ..... CO 'i~ fI9- 000 o C") 0 o ci g N N < N 2 a: W Z 3t o ..; E .lo:: 0- CI) > CI) 0 € 't:l CD C 't:l.CD :::::J C 't:l 2 ~ iIi C) N N Cl CD co CD CO CO N C") o 0 o 0 o 0 I I ~ (:l; J I N N C}I ~ ..... ..... C") C") I I C") C") N N ..... lD - o Cl .. ..... :::::J co e CD ..... ..... o 0 o 0 o 0 I I "it C") C") C") I I N N C}I C}I ..... ~ C") C") I I C") C") N N 000 " 0 0 cO 0 0 o 0 CO N ..... N N ..... ... CD € "E! co co :E 13 ~ a:: c o tn "t: co (.) Cl ..... "0 ....J Cl c 1ii tn 2 (.) ~ CI) - C :::::J J: LO o o o I C") C") I N C}I ...... C") I C") N C") ...... o ..... o 0 o 0 I I C") N C? C}I N N C}I C}I ....J ..... ..... < C? C? I- C") CO 0 N N I- < 2 c o tn "t: CO (.) "E! CO .!: o a:: LO N Cl N CD C't ...... ER- u) CO ...... ..... ER- " CO Ul t"') N ER- CO CO q i1i ER- o o M It) o ...... o N N c5 ...... ER- I - tn o (.) c tii :E U) X a:i )( :c c CD 0- 0- ~ U) ~ Cl 2 0.. I c ~I ... o ~ "E! o ~ N C") ..... C") o CO ...... sa CO ..... ~ ... CD - Cll ~ .lo:: C 2 I- ~ U Iii l- e 2 Page 1 of 1 Teresa Bender From: JlU Cline [ppcomp@sherbtel.nefj Sent: Thursday, July 31,20037:28 AM To: Teresa Bender Subject: Re: Thank youl Teresa Bender wrote: Dear Quad Community Press: Please run this legal on August 12 & August 19, 2003.Please send confirmation of receipt and printing of this attachment Thanksl ~ 11'__ 6t~ 6t4~tf& 1880 Jnm" Stiteet t!!m.fM8e&. WfJ115OO38 ~:(6!5f) 429-9232)b!3 :P4/b:{65f) 429-8629 7/31/2003 STAFF REPORT CENTERVILLE CITY C UNCIL Honorable Mayor and City ooneil Members Ms. Kim Moore-Sykes, Ci Administrator Ellen Paulseth, Finance irector c:eJ Hunters Crossing P I Date: Aogust 27, 2003 To: From: Re: ***************************** ****************************************** A balance of $35,648.51 remains the Hunters Crossing Phase I Project account. Unlike several other projects, th bond for this project was structured in such a way that -. the City was able to benefit :fro a positive arbitrage situation. The money can be transferred to the Debt Servic unci to help pay off the bond. If the money is needed for issues that may arise during e warranty period, the council can transfer the money to another fund as needed. A lution is attached. ervi{[e c:Esta6{isfiec{ 1857 1880 9IIiUn Street . CenteroiUe, fJVf!J.l 55038 (651) 429-3232 .!JClJ( (651) 429-8629 STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF ANOKA CITY OF CENTERVILLE RESOLUTION #03 - 044 A RESOLUTION TO CLOSE THE HUNTERS CROSSING 1ST ADDmON CAPITAL PROJECT FUND AND TRANSFER RESIDUAL EQUITY TO DEBT SERVICE WHEREAS, the Hunters Crossing 1st Addition Capital Project Fund has residual equity in the amount of $25,648.51; and, WHEREAS, the Hunters Crossing 1st Addition Project has been completed, all obligations have been satisfied, and the escrow has been returned, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCll.. OF THE CITY OF .CENTERVILLE, MINNESOTA: -- The remaining cash balance of$25,648.51 be, and hereby is, transferred from the Hunters Crossing 1 st Addition Capital Project Fund to the Hunters Crossing 1 st Addition Debt Service Fund. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City of Centerville this 27th day of August, 2003. Mayor, Terry Sweeney Attest: City Clerk, Teresa Bender .. 2000 2001 2002 2003 Revenues Expendltu~es 725,313.41 596,562.02 2,625.44 40,427.13 32,719.00 77,504.31 502.00 11,017.88 761.159.85 725.511.34 Breakdown of Revenues Engineering Escrow Bond Proceeds Interest Stormwater Fees Park Dedication Utilities Oversizing Breakdown of Expenses Engineering Advertising Construction Testing Legal Transfer of Escrow Stormwater Transfer Park Transfer Administration Transfers Fund Balance 8/12/2003 $7,000.00 $625,283.12 . $8,807.73 $14,950.00 $74,000.00 $31,119.00 $761.159.85 $83,580.82 $444.08 $525,493.84 $2,388.25 $2,554.35 $7,000.00 $14,950.00 $74,000.00 $15,100.00 $725.511.34 $35.648.51 Hunters Crossing Balance 128,751.39 90,949.70 . 46,164.39 35.648.51 positive balance in Hunter's Crossing 11 :09 AM hunters cros~ing STAFF REPORT CENTERVILLE CITY COUN Marsh Phase I project were calculated by should transfer this amount from the Water Project Fund to cover the expenses incurred. To: August 27, 2003 Honorable Mayor and City Co Ms. Kim Moore-Sykes, City A Date: From: Ellen Paulseth, Finance DO Re: Watermain Ovenizing e*e***********.*****..***..******.* *.****.*.**.e*.*e**************.***. Pheasant Manh Phase I City trunk costs for watermain on the Ph the City Engineer at $22,918. The coun . Fund to the Pheasant Marsh Phase I Ca . A resolution is attached. / ervi{{e 'EstaDfisfiec{ M57 1880 Main Street s Center1Ji.{{eJ 9Yfg{, 55038 (651) 429-3232 "~aJ( (651) 429-8629 STATE OF MINNESOTA . COUNTY OF ANOKA CITY OF CENTERVILLE RESOLUTION #03 - 045 A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE FINANCE DIRECTOR TO TRANSFER FUNDS FOR CITY W ATERMAIN TRUNK COSTS RELATING TO THE PHEASANT MARSH, PHASE I DEVELOPMENT PROJECT WHEREAS, the developer's agreement between the City of Centerville and Ground Development calls for the City to contribute the amount of $22,918 to the Pheasant Marsh, Phase I project to cover ~er main trunk: costs; and, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CENTERVILLE, MINNESOTA: That the Finance Director is hereby authorized and directed to transfer the amount of $22,918 from the Water Fund to the Pheasant Marsh, Phase I Capital Project Fund to cover city water main trunk costs. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City of Centerville this 27th day of August, 2003. Mayor, Terry Sweeney Attest: City Clerk, Teresa Bender tervi{{e ~Cisfiet{ 1857 1880 Main Street .. CenterviJ[e,9vfgI.[55038 (651) 429-3232 (I:Fwc (651) 429-8629 STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF ANOKA CITY OF CENTERVILLE RESOLUTION #03 - 046 A RESOLUTION ORDERING PREPARATION OF REPORT ON IMPROVEMENT WHEREAS, it is proposed to improve LaMotte Drive, Heritage Street, Dupre Road (portions of), Shad Avenue, Peterson Trail and 7300 Street ifttke.,CM 2804; Center Street (portions of) Tourville Circle, Oak Circle, Pheasant Lane (portions of) Brian Drive (portions of) Hi tke year 2006; and Peltier Lake Drive in the '} ear 2008 and to assess the benefited properties for all or a portion of the cost of the street improvements, pmsuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CENTERVILLE, MINNESOTA: That the proposed improvements be referred to B~nestroo, Rosene, Anderlik & Assoc., the City's engineering firm, for study and that they are instructed to report to the Council with all convenient speed advising the Council in a preliminary way as to whether the proposed improvements are necessary, cost-effective and feasible and as to whether it should best be made as proposed or in connection with some other improvement(s), and the estimated cost of the improvement as recommended. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City ofCenterville this 27th day of August, 2003. Mayor, Terry Sweeney Attest: City Clerk, Teresa Bender To: c~ 6t, ~ r~.. 13M ~ J~~.(j I-<~ J ~. ~r # f-R-"{'G }'1A. Ij,t.. { be fl.w#t, Uue kll-s bunl Z vE,,;1 Jft; t!) vc.,.12. Cthh//-t H-N: Iy. f1. ,'/ T;;~ro ~ A Ct,J je;dlll J ~ J (;12t4cik)( Jg ~ (. ~o~z kF1J ;/. lAJlf ,s Nol'yt'r; ;fc,clcl~.lfif Phe'f J'S /~/)% $12P1t',J {)tJf-1O )41; 0 rUa .J. eX I e~1 Ell f.o 5 uti "U I'Yw'", fI. ~ tJ t4- c~1'1 € b" r {)Jty s. fA} e It Ut; f? let- /1, ~, ~Id It i4 I-a he/ I' t If. f' ;; c '/~ IE .f,.; A ;::;:. J1JoJ21f I s"€;e ftJ, t1. € -{;'UJ ;:;,,,,. /y. /!"rj pi to/if! uJr kJt)u./d . I ( ~~ ~r> {J ~ ~6 JS A- fJ '3 (6'11-5 of . ~~. f3./0/. f>1 J3~rV(dS J4 f1J (j k (2tr 6~ f A- yUO;~~ 6&1" Z$ ff. -rl ,..~lb 'C rJ cJ{t s z iJ &;J if- It ftVf ~rJ' () t:J. tJOfJ I' CPnJcf. yo t- I We. I/J;t (b~ h Ii rJldJ y"tJ I,p IE , . . 1Jc.f"llfr~"s.. We tUduJci It ~ . {;.w- / I 1l!fJ k / Z fJ!" fJ€rm: f for ycJUfE C. t?OjJt./1f j/;hJ Wln",,- If_ l3{s~k fa /(t/ ~ /~r;4lt;r fpe;c. , Sound Levels in Centerville There are many variables possible when taking decibel readings. Among them are the cycle ranges, A (0-10,000) or C (500-10,000), weighted average at.2 seconds or.5 seconds, minimum. or maximum reMin~ are also possible at the .2 or .5 second average. The following are weighted average at the .5 second reading and the maximum at the .5 second reading. Also in the downtown area, no change was recorded when the meter was turned 180 degrees towards buildings on the other side of the street, probably due to noise bounce off the buildings. August 14th Inside of Kelly's at 2:45p.m. above pool table with 5 pattons inside. Average weighted 74 Outside on the comer: average weighted: car..75, truck..93, harley..l03 Average background.. ..68 8:40 p.m. Centerville Road across from Kelly's Background reading: 52 Volleyball players both courts 62 cars 74 August 26th 7:10 a.m. My House in Lino Lakes Background 53avg.......59 nlaX. Car buzzer...... 79 avg. August 26th . 1 :30 p.m. Background readings: Avg. Centerville Road across from Kelly's 63 LaMotte PaIk 50 Eagle Park 50 McBride Park. 51 New car running 20 feet away 62 73rd and 20th 52 5 minutes later with wind blowing and plane above 68 Behind City Hall 54 Max. 68 55 73 59 69 57 75 70 ~~ _ fpZ-.. db $14,000 $12,000 $10,000 $8;000 $6,000 $4,000 $2,000 o UPDATE ~ceipts d (])is6ursements .Jlugust 25 tlirougli.Jlugust 27, 2003 Receipts Disbursements $ 11,318.95 $13,809.34 Amount CITY OF CENTERVILLE Cash Receipts AUGUST 25 THRU AUGUST 27, 2003 Tran Date Refer Comments fUND 101 GENERAL FUND Act Type G $200.00 $3.00 $0.50 $4.50 $0.50 $0.50 $0.50 $110.00 $2.00 $0.50 Act $322.00 Ac::t Type R Act $25.00 $20.00 $20.00 $200.97 $90.00 $50.00 $209.30 $156.80 $3,436.04 $60.00 $4.25 $21.00 $4,293.36 FUND $4,615.36 8/2512003 8/2512003 8/2512003 8/2512003 8/25/2003 8/2512003 8/2512003 8/25/2003 8/2512003 8/27/2003 8/25/2003 8/25/2003 8/2512003 8/2512003 8/25/2003 8/2512003 8/2512003 8/25/2003 8/25/2003 8/27/2003 8/2712003 8/27/2003 Batch Name o 6870 MALLARY WA V - 08-25-03 o 1705 CENTER STREET - 08-25-03 o 6875 MALLARD WAY - 08-25-03 o 7240 UNITY AVE - 03-150 08-25-03 o 1812 MAIN ST - M03-039 08-25-03 o 1816 PELTIER LAKE DR - 08-25-03 o 1814 MAIN ST - M03-040 08-25-03 o 6870 MALLARY WA V - 08-25-03 o 1680 HERITAGE ST - 08-25-03 o 6936 IVY COURT - C03-068 82703 o 6870 MALLARV WAY - 08-25-03 o 1814 MAIN ST - M03-040 08-25-03 o 1812 MAIN ST - M03-039 08-25-03 o 1680 HERITAGE ST - 08-25-03 o 8875 MALLARD WAY - 08-25-03 o 1816 PELTIER LAKE DR - 08-25-03 o 7240 UNITY AVE - 03-150 08-25-03 o 1705 CENTER STREET - 08-25-03 o 6870 MALLARY WA V - 08-25-03 o 6936 NY COURT - C03-068 82703 o CAT TAG # 229 . 82703 o 7264 MOUND COURT 82703 FUND 415 STORM WATER IMP PROJECTS Act Type R $200.00 $27.80 $2.78 $50.16 $5.00 $285.74 Act FUND $285.74 fUND 601 WATER FUND Act Type G Act Act Type R $2.10 $2.10 $0.91 $9.16 $290.00 $1,500.00 $23.93 $239.17 $122.39 $12.24 8/2512003 8/25/2003 8/25/2003 8/27/2003 8/27/2003 8/27/2003 8/25/2003 8/2512003 8/25/2003 8/25/2003 8/25/2003 8/25/2003 8/27/2003 8/27/2003 o 6870 MALLARY WAY- o UB Receipt Serv 10 DRAIN o UB Receipt Serv Pen 10 o UB Receipt Serv 10 DRAIN o UB Receipt Serv Pen 10 08-25-03 82503ut 82503ut 082703ut 082703ut o UB Receipt Sure 1 SALES 082703ut o UB Receipt Serv Pen 30 82503ut o UB Receipt Serv 30 WATER 82503ut o 6870 MALLARY WAY - 08-25-03 o 6870 MALLARYWAY - 08-25-03 o UB Receipt Serv Pen 1 82503ut o UB Receipt Serv 1 WATER 82503ut o UB Receipt Serv 1 WATER 082703ut o UB Receipt Serv Pen 1 0827030t 08127/03 3:44 PM Page 1 Account Descr G 101-24504 Site Maln. Escrow G 101-24500 Bldg. Permit Surcharge G 101-24501 Plmblng Permit G 101-24500 Bldg. Permit Surcharge G 101-24502 Mach. Permit Surcharge G 101-24503 Elee. Permit Surcharge G 101-24502 Mach. Permit Surcharge G 101-24500 Bldg. Permit Surcharge G 101-24500 Bldg. Permit Surcharge G 101-24503 Elee. Permit Surcharge R 101-32300 Site Maintenance Fees R 101-32210 BuildlnglMech. Permits R 101-32210 Building/Mach. Permits R 101-32210 Bulldlng/Mech. Permits . R 101-32180 Plumbing Permits R 101-32225 Electrical Inspection R 101-32210 BulldlnglMech. Permits R 101-32210 Bullding/Mech. Permits R 101-32210 Bulldlng/Mech. Permits R 101-32225 Electrical Inspection R 101-32200 Animal Ucenses R 101-36100 Special Assessments R 415-34000 Chrgsfor Serv. Drain R 415-32350 Storm Water Drainage R 415-32350 Storm Water Drainage R 415-32350 Storm Water Drainage R 415-32350 Storm Water Drainage G 601-20800 State Sales & Use Tax R 601-34400 Safe Drinking Water Fee R 601-34400 Safe Drinking Water Fee R 601-34600 Water Meter Charges R 601-37150 Water R 601-37100 Water Sales R 601-37100 Water Sales R 601-37100 Water Sales R 601-37100 Water Sales Amount Act $2.94 $1.48 $14.72 $29.36 $2,246.30 FUND $2.248.40 fUND 602 SewER FUND Act Type G . $1,262.25 Act $1,262.25 Act Type R $2,000.00 $302.03 $30.22 $12.75 $44.55 $4.45 $46.66 $466.54 Act $2,907.20 FUND $4,169.45 $11,318.95 Name CITY OF CENTERVILLE 08/27/03 3:44 PM Page 2 Cash Receipts AUGUST 25 THRU AUGUST 27, 2003 Tran Date Refer Comments Batch Name Account Descr 8/27/2003 8/27/2003 8/27/2003 8/27/2003 o UB Receipt Serv Pen 15 082703ut o US Receipt Serv Pen 30 082703ut o UB Receipt Serv 30 WATER 082703ut o UB Receipt Serv 15 WATER 082703ut R 601-37100 Water Sales R 601-34400 Safe Drinking Water Fee R 601-34400 Safe Drinking Water Fee R 601-37100 Water Sales 8/25/2003 o 6870 MALLARY WAY- 08-25-03 G 602.20801 Service Availability 8/25/2003 o 6870 MALLARY WAY- 08-25-03 R 602-37250 Sewer 8/25/2003 o US Receipt Serv 6 SewER 82503ut R 602-37200 Sewer Sales 8/25/2003 o UB Receipt Serv Pen 6 82503ut R 602-37200 Sewer Sales 8/2512003 o 6870 MALLARY WAY - 08-25-03 R 602-34700 SAC Charges 8/27/2003 o UB Receipt Serv 18 082703ut R 602-37200 Sewer Sales 8/27/2003 o UB Receipt Serv Pen 18 082703ut R 602-37200 Sewer Sales 8/27/2003 o UB Receipt Serv Pen 6 082703ut R 602.37200 Sewer Sales 8/27/2003 o UB Receipt Serv 6 SewER 082703ut R 602-37200 Sewer Sales CITY OF CENTERVILLE 08/27/033:50 PM Page 1 *Check Summary Register@) AUGUST 2003 Check Date Check Amt 10100 MAIN STREET BANK Paid Chk# 018385 AVLIC Paid Chk# 018386 CORNER EXPRESS Paid Chk# 018387 HAWKINS WATER TREATMENT Paid Chk# 018388 IRS/MAIN STREET BANK Paid Chk# 018389 KENNEDY & GRAVEN Paid Chk# 018390 MCLEOD USA . Paid Chk# 018391 MINNESOTA DEPT OF Paid Chk# 018392 NATIONWIDE RETIREMENT Paid Chk# 018393 NCPERS LIFE INSURANCE Paid Chk# 018394 PALZER, PAUL Paid Chk# 018395 PUBLIC EMPLOYEES Paid Chk# 018396 QWEST Paid Chk# 018397 STRATEGIC INSIGHTS Paid Chk# 018398 SUPERIOR LAMP & SUPPLY Paid Chk# 018399 TRU GREEN - CHEM LAWN 8/28/2003 8/28/2003 8/28/2003 8/28/2003 8/28/2003 8/28/2003 8/28/2003 8/28/2003 8/28/2003 8/28/2003 8/28/2003 8/28/2003 8/28/2003 8/28/2003 8/28/2003 Total Checks $456.00 DEP COMP - 8-28-03 $198.92 FUEL FOR JULY $1,211.10 CHEMICALS FOR WATER $3,830.25 FED WIH PAYROLL 8-28-03 $3,037.22 GEN OBLI. TEMP IMPR. BONDS, SE $730.34 SERV THRU 8-15-03 $612.99 PAYROLL W/H 8-28-03 $729.00 DEP COMP WIH 8-28-03 $64.00 E. PAULSETH & T BENDER INS. $18.00 MILEAGE FOR BLDG CODE SEMINAR $1,730.37 PAYROLL WIH 8-28-03 $272.35 651-429-4969 SERV THRU8-15-03 $399.38 CAPITAL PLANNING SOFlWARE $253.17 LIGHTS - P.W. $266.25 LAWN CARE $13,809.34 ..' STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF ANOKA This, Ordinance has been reviewed by the Police, ',' Chief and City Attoriiey./. CITY OF CENTERVH..LE ORDINANCE #77 An Ordinance regulating the Oean-up of Oandestine Drug Lab Sites and Chemical Dump Sites within the City of CenterviUe, Minnesota and providing for the adminu,tration and enforcement of such regulations. The City Council of the City ofCenterville ordains as follows: Section 1. General Provisions. 1. Purpose and Intent. The purpose of this ordinance !! to reduce public exposure to heath risks where law enforcement officers have determined that hazardous chemicals or residue from a suspected clandestine drug lab site or associated dump site may exist. Professional reports, based on assessments, testing and investigations, show that chemicals used in the production of illicit drugs can condense, penetrate, and contaminate surfaces, furnishings, and equipment of surrounding structures. The City Council finds that such sites, and the personal property within such' sites, may contain suspected chemicals and residues that place people, particularly children or adults of child bearing age, at risk when exposed through inhabiting or visiting the site or using or being exposed to contaminated personal property. 2. Interpretation and application. In the interpretation and application of this article, the provisions herein shall be construed to protect the public health, safety and welfare. Where the conditions imposed by any provision of this ordinance are either more or less restrictive to the public than comparable provisions imposed by any other law, ordinance, statute, or regulation of any kind, the regulations which are more restrictive or which impose higher standards or requirements on the public shall prevail. Should any court of competent jurisdiction d~lare any section or subpart of this .article to be invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the ordinance as a whole or any part thereot: other than the provision declared invalid. , 3. Fees. Fees for the administration of this ordinance may be established and amended periodically by resolution of the City Council. Page 1 of9 Section 2. Definitions. For the purposes of this ordinance, the following terms or words shall be interpreted as follows: Child - Shall mean any person less than 18 years of age. Chemical dump site - Shall mean any place or area where chemicals or other waste materials used in a clandestine drub lab operation have been located. City - Shall mean the City of Centerville. Clandestine drug lab sitesIWastes/Substanees - Shall mean any place or area where law enforcement has determined that conditions associated with the operation of an unlawful clandestine drug lab exist. A clandestine drug lab site may include dwellings, accessory buildings, accessory structmes, a chemical dumpsite, any land or personal property which may include vehicle(s), boat(s), trailer(s), etc. Wastes generated from a clandestine drug lab shall be treated, stored, transported or disposed of in a manner consistent with Minnesota Department of Health, Minnesota Pollution Control, and Anoka County Health Department rules and regulations. Clandestine drug lab operation - Shall mean the unlawful manufacture or attempt to manufacture a controlled substance. Controlled substance - Shall mean any drug, substance or immediate precursor in Minnesota Statute ~ 152.02 Schedules I through V together with any amendments or modifications thereto. The term shall not include distilled spirits, wine, malt beverages, intoxicating liquors or tobacco. Manufacture, (in places other than a pharmacy) - Shall mean and include the production, cultivation, quality control, and standardization, by mechanical, physical, chemical or pharmaceutical means, and the packing, repacking, tableting, encapsulating, labeling, relabeling, or filling or by other process of drugs. Owner - Shall mean any person(s), firm(s), corporation(s) or other entity who or which owns, in whole or in part, the land, building, structure, vehicle, boat, trailer or other location associated with a clandestine drug lab site or chemical dump site. Section 3. Declaration of Site and Contents as a Public Health Nuisance. All dwellings, accessory structures, buildings, vehicles, boats, trailers, personal property, adjacent property or other locations, associated with a clandestine drug lab site or chemical dump site are potentially unsafe due to health hazards and are hereby declared to be a public health nuisance. Page 2 of9 Section 4. Law Enforcement Action. If law enforcement authorities determine the existence of a clandestine drug lab site or chemical dump site, the site, and all personal property therein, shall be declared a public health nuisance. Law enforcement authorities who identify conditions associated with a clandestine drug lab site or chemical dwnpsite which may place neighbors, the visiting public, or present and future occupants of the site at risk: for exposure to harmful co~minants and other associated conditions are authorized to take the following action: 1. Promptly notify the State Duty Officer, Chemical Assessment Team (CAT), Crime Lab:L- City Building Official, child protection, public health authorities and the appropriate enforcement division of the drug enforcement administration of the u.S. Justice Department of the location of the site, loca1law enforcement officials, and the owner if known, of the conditions found; and 2. Treat, store, .ort or dispose of all wastes/substances generated from a clandestine ~peration found at the site in a manner consistent with Minnesota Department of Health, Minnesota Pollution Control and Anoka County Health Department rules and regulations; and 3. Public Health Official"'/ rt~ a temporary declaration of public health nuisance for the affect&! ;ite and post a copy of the declaration on all doorway entrances to the site or, in the case of bare land, post the declaration in several conspicuous places on the property. This temporary declaration of public health nuisance shall expire subsequent to the same authority and the City Building Official inspecting the site and determining the appropriateness of issuing a after the City Building Official inspects the site and determines the appropriateness of issuing a permanent declaration of public health nuisance; and 4. The Chemical Assessment Team (CAT) and Crime Lab will notify all persons occupying the site that a temporary. declaration of public health nuisance has been issued; and 5. Require all persons occupying the site to immediately vacate the site, remove all pets from the site, and not return without written authorization from the City Building Official; and 6. Notify all ~pants vacating the site that all personal property at the site may be contaminated with dangerous chemical residue; and 7. Public Health Official or City Building Official may put locks on each doorway entrance to the site to prohibit people from entering the site without authorization after all occupants of the site have vacated. Page 3 of9 The obligation to promptly notify the persons and organizations mentioned above may be delayed to accomplish appropriate law enforcement objectives, but only to the extent that public health and child protection responsibilities are not unnecessarily compromised. Section S. Seizure of Prooertv. When the clandestine drug lab site or chemical dump site is inside a vehicle, boat, trailer or other form of moveable personal property, law enforcement authorities, upon the direction of the Duty Officer, Chemical Assessment Team (CAT) and Crime Lab, shall immediately seize it and not allow it to be transported except to a more secure location. In such circumstances, all other requirements of this ordinance shall be followed as closely as possible given the specific type of property in which the site is discovered. Section 6. Action bv City BuHdinS! Official. 1. Inspection and Declaration of Nuisance. Wrthin 48 hours of notification that law enforcement authorities have determined the existence of a clandestine drug lab site or chemical dump site, the City Building Official shall inspect the site to determine the appropriate scope of a permanent declaration of public health nuisance. Based on the results of the inspection, the City Building Official may then promptly issue a permanent declaration of public health nuisance and a Do Not Enter-Unsafe to Occupy Order for the affected site to replace the temporary declaration issued and posted by law enforcement. A copy of the permanent declaration and order shall be posted on all doorway entrances to the site or, in the case of bare land, shall be posted in several conspicuous places on the property. 2. Abatement Order. After a permanent declaration of public health nuisance has been issued and posted, the City Building Official shall send written notice to the site owner ordering abatement of the public health nuisance. The abatement order shall include the following information: a A copy of the declaration of public health nuisance and Do Not Enter- Unsafe to Occupy Order; and b. Information about the potentially hazardous condition of the site; and c. Notification of suspension of the site's rental license if applicable; and d. A summary of the site oWner's and occupant's responsibilities under this ordinance; and e. Information that may help the owner locate appropriate services necessary to abate the public health nuisance. 3. Notice to Concerned Parties. The Building Official shall also mail a copy of the permanent declaration of public health nuisance, a copy of this ordinance, and a notification of the suspension of the site's rental licensees, if applicable, to the following concerned parties at their last known address: Page 4 of9 a. Occupants or residents of the site if the identities of such persons are known; and b. Neighbors in proximity to the site who may be reasonably affected by the conditions found; and c. The City Administrator; and d. The Community Development Director; and e. The City Police Department; and f. The appropriate enforcement division of the Drug Enforcement Administration of the U.S. Justice Department; and g. Other City, State and Local authorities, such as the city Water Department, the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, the Department of Natural Resources and any other agency or authority which is known to have public and protection responsibilities that are applicable to the situation. 4. Modification or removal of declaration. The City Building Official is authorized to modify or remove the declaration of public health nuisance after the Building Official receives documentation from a City approved environmental hazard testing and cleaning firm. stating that the suspected health and safety risks, including those of neighbors and potential dwelling occupants, either do not exist or have been sufficiently abated or corrected to justify amendment or removal of the declaration. Section 7. Site Owner's Resoonsibilitv to Act. Within ten (10) business days of the date the abatement order is mailed to the owner of the site, the owner shall accomplish the following: 1. Provide the City Building Official, City Administrator and City Attorney with written notification: a. That the owner has confirmed that all persons and their pets have vacated the site; and b. Of the name(s) of all children who the owner believes were residing at the site during the time period the clandestine drug lab or chemical dump site is suspected to have been at the site; and c. That the site will remain vacated and secured until the public health nuisance is completely abated as required by this ordinance. 2. Contract with one (1) or more City approved environmental hazard testing and cleaning firms to conduct the following work in accordance with the most current Minnesota Department of Health guidelines: a. A detailed on-site assessment of the extent of contamination at the site and the contamination of the personal property therein; Page 5 of9 b. Soil testing of the site and testing of all property and soil in proximity to the site which the environmental hazard testing and cleaning firm determines may have been affected by the conditions found at the site; and c. A complete clean up of the site (including, but not limited to, the clean up or removal of plumbing, ventilation systems, fixtures and contaminated soil) or a demolition of the site and complete clean up of the demolished site; and d. A complete clean up, or disposal at an approved dump site, of all personal property in the site; and e. A cOmplete clean up of all property and soil in proximity to the site which is found to have been affected by the conditions found at the site; and f Remediation testing and follow-up testing, including, but not limited to, testing of the ventilation system and plumbing, to determine that all health risks are sufficiently reduced, according to Minnesota Department of Health guidelines,. to allow safe human occupancy and use of the site and use of the personal property therein and of all property and soil in proximity to the site. 3. Provide the City Building Official with the identity of the testing and cleaning firm with which the owner has contracted for abatement of the public health nuisance as required above; and 4. Sign an agreement with the City Building Official establishing a clean up schedule. The schedule shall establish reasonable deadlines for completing all actions required by this ordinance for abatement of the public health nuisance. In determining appropriate deadlines, the City Building Official shall consider practica1limitations and the availability of contractors in approving the schedule for clean up. The site owner must meet all deadlines established on the clean up schedule. Also, pursuant to the deadlines established by the clean up schedule, the site owner is required to provide the City Building Official with written documentation of the clean up process, including a signed statement from a City approved environmental hazard testing and cleaning firm that the site, all personal property therein and all property and soil in proximity to the site, is safe for human occupancy and use and that the clean up was conducted in accordance with the most current Minnesota Department of Health guidelines. Section 8. Site Owner's Resoonsibilitv for Costs. The site owner shall be responsible for all costs, including those of the City, of dealing with and abating the public health nuisance, including contractor's fees and the City's costs for services performed in association with the clandestine drug lab site or chemical dump site clean up. The City's cost may also include, but shall not be limited to: 1. Posting of the site; and Page 6 of9 2. Notification of affected parties; and 3. Securing the site, providing limited access to the site, and prosecution of unauthorized persons found at the site; and 4. Expense related to the recovery of costs, including the assessment process; and 5. Laboratory fees; and 6. Clean up services; and 7. Administrative fees; and 8. Legal fees; and 9. Other associated costs Section 9. Citv Action and Recovery of Costs. 1. If the building owner fails to comply with any of the requirements of this ordinance, the City Building Official is authorized to take all reasonable actions necessary to abate the public health nuisance including, but not limited to, contracting with a City approved environmental hazard testing and cleaning firm to conduct the work outlined in Section 7 of this ordinance. The Building Official is also authorized to provide a copy of the declaration of public health nuisance to the lien and/or mortgage holders of the affected site to help assure that persons with interest in the site have access to information about the declaration of public health nuisance. 2. If the costs to clean the site or to clean the personal property at the site are prohibitively high in relation to the value of the site or the personal property, the City is authorized to. remove or demolish the site, structure or building and/or dispose of the personal property therein. These actions shall be taken in accordance with the provisions of Minnesota Statute Chapter 463 together with any amendments or modifications thereto. 3. If the City abateS or assists in abating the public health nuisance, in addition to any other legal remedy, the City shall be entitled to recover all of its out of pocket costs as set forth in Section 8 above and an additional 25 percent of such costs for administrative and legal expense. The City may recover costs by civil action against the owner of the site or by assessing such costs as a special charge against the site as taxes and special assessments are certified and collected pursuant to Minnesota Statute ~ 429.101 or according to the provisions of Minnesota Statute Chapter 463 together with any amendments or modifications thereto. Section 10. Recovery of Costs from Persons CaDsin2 Dama2e. No provisions of this ordinance are intended to limit the site owner's, residents' or the City's right to recover costs incurred under this article from either the persons contributing to the public health nuisance, such as the operators of the clandestine drug lab, and/or from other lawful sources. Page 7 of9 Section 11. Site Owner and Address. When the site is real property and the owner or the address of the owner of the site is unknown, the owner and the owner's address is deemed to be that of the property's taxpayer's name and address as that information is maintained by the County Auditor's Office. When the site is a vehicle, boat or trailer and the owner or the address of the owner of the site is unknown, the owner and the owner's address is deemed to be that of the person on file as the owner on the current or most recent title to the vehicle, boat or trailer. Section 12. SusDension of Residential Rental Certification. Upon issuance of a permanent declaration of public health nuisance, any residential rental certificate issued by the City for the site, or any part thereot: is hereby declared to be immediately suspended pending full compliance with this ordinance. Section 13. Unauthorized Removal of Postina It is unlawful for any person, except authorized City personnel or Public Health Officials, to remove postings desi8"8ting a temporary or permanent declaration of public health nuisance and/or Do Not Enter - Unsafe to Occupy Order from a chemical dump site or a clandestine drug lab site. Section 14. Entrv Into or Onto Site. While a declaration of public health nuisance for an affected site is in effect and has been posted at the site, no persons are permitted to be inside the site, or on the site property without prior written consent of the City Building Official or as otherwise authorized by this ordinance. To confirm compliance with this ordinance and to execute their duties under this ordinance, law enforcement officers, the City Building Official, and any persons designated by the Building Official, may enter onto the site property or enter into the site at any time while a declaration of public health nuisance is in effect for the site. Section 15. Removal of Penonal Prouertv from the Site. While a declaration of public health nuisance for an affected site is in effect and has been posted at the site, no personal property may be removed from the site without prior written consent from the City Building Official. Consent to remove personal property shall only be granted at the reasonable discretion of the Building Official, and only in cases of hardship after: 1. A City approved environmental hazard testing and cleaning firm. has advised the City, in writing, that the item(s) of personal property can be sufficiently cleaned to remove all harmful contamination; and 2. The owner of the personal property agrees in writing: Page 8 of9 a That the owner is aware of the danger of using the contaminated property; and b. That the owner will thoroughly clean the property to remove all contamination prior to the use of the property; and c. That the owner releases and agrees to indemnify the city, its Staff: and the City Council from all liability to the owner and/or third persons for injuries or damages caused, or alleged to have been caused, by the contJtminatec:J property. Section 16. Violations and Penalties. Any person violating any provision of this ordinance is guilty of a misdemeanor and upon conviction shall be subject to the penalties set forth in Minnesota Statute ~ 609.02, Subd. 3. Section 17. Effective Date. The effective date of this Ordinance shall be after its passage and publication according to law. Adopted by the Centerville City Council this Mayor, Terry Sweeney City Clerk Published in the Quad Community Press on Page 9 of9 , STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF ANOKA CITY OF CENTERVILLE ORDINANCE #77 An Ordinance regulating the Clean-up of Clandestine Drug Lab Sites and Chemical Dump Sites within the City of Centerville, Minnesota and providing for the admini~tration and enforcement of such regulations. The City Council of the City of Centerville ordains as follows: Section 1. General Provisions. 1. Purpose and Intent. The purpose of this ordinance to reduce public exposure to heath risks where law enforcement officers have determined that hazardous chemicals or residue from a suspected clandestine drug lab site or associated dump site may exist. Professional reports, based .on assessments, testing and investigations, show that chemicals used in the production of illicit drugs can condense, penetrate, and contaminate surfaces, furnishings, and equipment of surrounding structures. The City Council finds that such sites, and the personal property within such sites, may contain suspected chemicals and residues that place people, particularly children or adults of child bearing age, at risk when exposed through inhabiting or visiting the site or using or being exposed to contaminated personal property. 2. Interpretation and application. In the interpretation and application of this article, the provisions herein shall be construed to protect the public health, safety and welfare. Where the conditions imposed by any provision of this ordinance are either more or less restrictive to the public than comparable provisions imposed by any other law, ordinance, statute, or regulation of any kind, the regulations which are more restrictive or which impose higher standards or requirements on the public shall prevail. Should any court of competent jurisdiction declare any section or subpart of this article to be invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the ordinance as a whole or any part thereof, other than the provision declared invalid 3. Fees. Fees for the administration of this ordinance may be established and amended periodically by resolution of the City Council. Page 1 of9 Section 2. Definitions. For the purposes of this ordinance, the following terms or words shall be interpreted as follows: Child - Shall mean any person less than 18 years of age. Chemieal dump site Shall meaB aBY plaee ar area where ehemieaJs ar other waste materiaJs 1:1Sed in a elaB~estino drub lab epefatian have beeR leeated. City - Shall mean the City of Centerville. Clandestine drug lab siteslWastes/Substances - Shall mean any place or area where law enforcement has determined that conditions associated with the operation of an unlawful clandestine drug lab exist. A clandestine drug lab site may include dwellings, accessory buildings, accessory structures, a chemical dumpsite, any land or personal property which may include vehicle(s), boat(s), trailer(s), etc. Wastes generated from a clandestine drug lab shall be treated. stored. transported or disposed of in a manner consistent with Minnesota Dc:wartment of Health. Minnesota Pollution ControL and Anoka County Health Deoartment rules and regulations. Clandestine drug lab operation - Shall mean the unlawful manufacture or attempt to manufacture a controlled substance. Controlled substance - Shall mean any drug, substance or immediate precursor in Minnesota Statute ~ 152.02 Schedules I through V together with any amendments or modifications thereto. The term. shall not include distilled spirits, wine, malt beverages, intoxicating liquors or tobacco. Household Hazardous Wastes Shall mean waste genemted from a elandestiRe drug lab epefatien. Suea wastes shall be treated, stared., tfaBSfJerted er EliSf'ese~ ef in a mamlor eonsistent with Minnesota Department of Health, Minnesota PeRmion Control, a:na ;\.Belm COWlty Health DepartmeBt rules a:na regalatians. Manufacture, (in places other than a pharmacy) - Shall mean and include the production, cultivation, quality control, and standardization, by mechanical, physical, chemical or pharmaceutical means, and the packing, repacking, tableting, encapsulating, labeling, relabeling, or filling or by other process of drugs. Owner - Shall mean any person(s), fumes), corporation(s) or other entity who or which owns, in whole or in part, the land, building, structure, vehicle, boat, trailer or other location associated with a clandestine drug lab site or chemical dump site. Page 2 of9 Section 3. Declaration of Site and Contents as a Public Health Nuisance. All dwellings, accessory structures, buildings, vehicles, boats, trailers, personal property, adjacent property or other locations, associated with a clandestine drug lab site or chemical dump site are potentially unsafe due to health hazards and are hereby declared to be a public health nuisance. Section 4. Law Enforcement Action. If law enforcement authorities determine the existence of a clandestine drug lab site or chemical dump site, the site, and all personal property therein, shall be declared a public health nuisance. Law enforcement authorities who identify conditions associated with. a clandestine drug lab site or chemical dumpsite which may place neighbors, the visiting public, or present and future occupantS of the site at risk for exposure to harmful contaminants and other associated conditions are authorized to t3.ke the following action: 1. Promptly notify the State Duty Officer. Chemical Assessment Team (CAn. Crime Lab. City Building Official, child protection, public health authorities and the appropriate enforcement division of the drug enforcement administration of the U.S. Justice Department of the location of the site, local law enforcement officials, and the owner if known, of the conditions found; and 2. Treat, store, transport or dispose of all household hazardous waste found at the site in a manner consistent with Minnesota Department of Health, Minnesota Pollution Control and Anoka County Health Department rules and regulations; and 3. Public Health Officials may issue a temporary declaration of public health nuisance for the affected site and post a copy of the declaration on all doorway entrances to the site or, in the case of bare land, post the declaration in several conspicuous places on the property. This temporary declaration of public" health nuisance shall expire subsequent to the same authority and the. City Building Official inspecting the site and determining the appropriateness of issuing a aftef the City B1:1ilding Offieial iftspeets the site Bfld determines the appr-opriaten0ss of issl:l'iBg a permanent declaration of public health nuisance; and . 4. The Chemical Assessment Team (CAT) and Crime Lab will notify all persons occupying the site that a temporary declaration of public health nuisance h-as-been issued; and 5. Require all persons occupying the site to immediately vacate the site, remove all pets from the site, and not return without written authorization from the City Building Official; and 6. Notify all occupants vacating the site that all personal property at the site may be contaminated with dangerous chemical residue; and Page 3 of9 7. Public Health Official or City Building Official may put locks on each doorway entrance to the site to prohibit people from entering the site without authorization after all occupants of the site have vacated. The obligation to promptly notify the persons and organizations mentioned above may be delayed to accomplish appropriate law enforcement objectives, but only to the extent that public health and child protection responsibilities are not unnecessarily compromised. Section 5. Seizure of Property. When the clandestine drug lab site or chemical dump site is inside a vehicle, boat, trailer or other form of moveable personal property, law enforcement authorities, upon the direction of the Duty Officer. Chemical Assessment Team (CAT) and Crime Lab. shall immediately seize it and not allow it to be transported except to a more secure location. In such circumstances, all other requirements of this ordinance shall be followed as closely as possible given the specific type of property in which the site is discovered. Section 6. Action bv City Building Official. 1. Inspection and Declaration of Nuisance. Within 48 hours of notification that law enforcement authorities have determined the existence of a clandestine drug lab site or chemical dump site, the City Building Official shall inspect the site to determine the appropriate scope of a permanent declaration of public health nuisance. Based on the results of the inspection, the City Building Official may then promptly issue a permanent declaration of public health nuisance and a Do Not Enter-Unsafe to Occupy Order for the affected site to replace the temporary declaration issued and posted by law enforcement. A copy of the permanent declaration and order shall be posted on all doorway entrances to the site or, in the case of bare land, shall be posted in several conspicuous places on the property. 2. Abatement Order. After the permanent declaration of public health nuisance has been issued and posted, the City Building Official shall send written notice to the site owner ordering abatement of the public health nuisance. The abatement order shall include the following information: a. A copy of the declaration of public health nuisance and Do Not Enter- Unsafe to Occupy Order; and b. information about the potentially hazardous condition of the site; and c. Notification of suspension of the site's rental license if applicable; and d. A snmmary of the site owner's and occupant's responsibilities under this ordinance; and e. Information that may help the owner locate appropriate services necessary to abate the public health nuisance. Page 4 of9 3. Notice to Concerned Parties. The Building Official shall also mail a copy of the permanent declaration of public health nuisance, a copy of this ordinance, and a notification of the suspension of the site's rental licensees, if applicable, to the following concerned parties at their last known address: a. Occupants or residents of the site if the identities of such persons are known; and b. Neighbors in proximity to the site who may be reasonably affected by the conditions found; and c. The City Administrator; and d. The Community Development Director; and e. The City Police Department; and f. The appropriate enforcement division of the Drug Enforcement Administration of the U.S. Justice Department; and g. Other City, State and Local authorities, such as the city Water Department, the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, the , and the Department of Natural Resources which are known to have public and protection responsibilities that are applicable to the situation. 4. Modification or removal of declaration. The City Building Official is authorized to modify or remove the declaration of public health nuisance after the Building Official receives documentation from a City approved environmental hazard testing and cleaning firm stating that the suspected health and safety risks, including those of neighbors and potential dwelling occupants, either do not exist or have been sufficiently abated or corrected to justify amendment or removal of the declaration. Section 7. Site Owner's' Responsibility to Act. Within ten (10) business days of the date the abatement order is mailed to the owner of the site, the owner shall accomplish the following: 1. Provide the City Building Official, City Administrator and City Attorney with written notification: a. That the owner has confirmed that all persons and their pets have vacated the site; and b. Of the name(s) of all children who the owner believes were residing at the site during the time period the clandestine drug lab or chemical dump site is suspected to have been at the site; and c. That the site will remain vacated and secured until the public health nuisance is completely abated as required by this ordinance. 2. Contract with one (1) or more City approved environmental hazard testing and cleaning firms to conduct the following work in accordance with the most current Minnesota Department of Health guidelines: Page 5 of9 a. A detailed on-site assessment of the extent of contamination at the site and the contamination of the personal property therein; b. Soil testing of the site and testing of all property and soil in proximity to the site which the environmental hazard testing and cleaning firm determines may have been affected by the conditions found at the site; and c. A complete clean up of the site (including, but not limited to, the clean up or removal of plumbing, ventilation systems, fixtures and contaminated soil) or a demolition of the site and complete clean up of the demolished site; and d. A complete clean up, or disposal at an approved dump site, of all personal property in the site; and e. A complete clean up of all property and soil in proximity to the site which is found to have been affected by the conditions found at the site; and f. Remediation testing and follow-up testing, including, but not limited to, testing of the ventilation system and plumbing, to determine that all health risks are sufficiently reduced, according to Minnesota Deparment of Health guidelines, to allow safe human occupancy and use of the site and use of the personal property therein and of all property and soil in proximity to the site. 3. Provide the City Building Official with the identity of the testing and cleaning firm with which the owner has contracted for abatement of the public health nuisance as required above; and 4. Sign an agreement with the City Building Official establishing a clean up schedule. The schedule shall establish reasonable deadlines for completing all actions required by this ordinance for abatement of the public health nuisance. In determining appropriate deadlines, the City Building Official shall consider practical limitations and the availability of contractors in approving the schedule for clean up. The site owner must meet all deadlines established on the clean up schedule. Also, pursuant to the deadlines established by the clean up schedule, the site owner is required to provide the City Building Official with written documentation of the clean up process, including a signed statement from a City approved environmental hazard testing and cleaning firm that the site, all personal property therein and all property and soil in proximity to the site, is safe for human occupancy and use and that the clean up was conducted in accordance with the most current Minnesota Department of Health guidelines. Section 8. Site Owner's Responsibility for Costs. The site owner shall be responsible for all costs, including those of the City, of dealing with and abating the public health nuisance, including contractor's fees and the City's Page 60f9 costs for services performed in association with the clandestine drug lab site. or chemical dump site clean up. The City's cost may also include, but shall not be limited to: 1. Posting of the site; and 2. Notification of affected parties; and 3. Securing the site, providing limited access to the site, and prosecution of unauthorized persons found at the site; and 4. Expense related to the recovery of costs, including the assessment process; and 5. Laboratory fees; and 6. Clean up services; and 7. Administrative fees; and 8. Legal fees; and 9. Other associated costs Section 9. City Action and Recovery of Costs. 1. If the building owner fails to comply with any of the requirements of this ordinance, the City Building Official is authorized to take all reasonable actions necessary to abate the public health nuisance including, but not limited to, contracting with a City approved environmental hazard testing and cleaning firm to conduct the work outlined in Section 7 of this ordinance. The Building Official is also authorized to provide a copy of the declaration of public health nuisance to the lien and/or mortgage holders of the affected site to help assure that persons with interest in the site have access to information about the declaration of public health nuisance. 2. If the costs to clean the site or to clean the personal property at the site are prohibitively high in relation to the value of the site or the personal property, the City is authorized to remove or demolish the site, structure or building and/or dispose of the personal property therein. These actions shall be taken in accordance with the provisions of Minnesota Statute Chapter 463 together with any amendments or modifications thereto. 3. If the City abates the public health nuisance, in addition to any other legal remedy, the City shall be entitled to recover all of its out of pocket costs plus an additional 25 percent of such costs for administrative and legal expense. The City may recover costs by civil action againsTlhe owner of the site or by assessmg such costs as .a special charge against the site as taxes and special assessments are certified and collected pursuant to Minnesota Statute ~ 429.101 or according to the provisions of Minnesota Statute Chapter 463 together with any amendments or modifications thereto. Page 7 of9 Section 10. Recovery of Costs from Persons Causine Damaee. No provisions of this ordinance are intended to limit the site owner's, residents' or the City's right to recover costs incurred under this article from either the persons contributing to the public health nuisance, such as the operators of the clandestine drug lab, and/or from other lawful sources. Section 11. Site Owner and Address. When the site is real property and the owner or the address of the owner of the site is unknown, the owner and the owner's address is deemed to be that of the property's taxpayer's name and address as that information is maintained by the County Auditor's Office. When the site is a vehicle, boat or trailer and the owner or the address of the owner of the site is unknown, the owner and the owner's address is deemed to be that of the person on file as the owner on the current or most recent title to the vehicle, boat or trailer. Section 12. Suspension of Residential Rental Certification. Upon issuance of a permanent declaration of public health nuisance, any residential rental certificate issued by the City for the site, or any part thereof,. is hereby declared to be immediately suspended pending full compliance with this ordinance. Section 13. Unauthorized Removal of Po stines. It is unlawful for any person, except authorized City personnel or Public Health Officials. to remove a temporary or permanent declaration of public health nuisance and/or Do Not Enter - Unsafe to Occupy Order from a chemical dump site or a clandestine drug lab site. Section 14. Entry Into or Onto Site. While a declaration of public health nuisance for an affected site is in effect and has been posted at the site, no persons are permitted to be inside the site, or on the site property without prior written consent of the City Building Official or as otherwise authorized by this ordnance. To confirm compliance with this ordinance and to execute their duties under this ordinance, law enforcement officers, the City Building Official, and any persons designated by the Building Official, may enter onto the site property or enter into the site at any time while a declaration of public health nuisance is in effect for the site. Section 15. Removal of Personal Property from the Site. While a declaration of public health nuisance for an affected site is in effect and has been posted at the site, no personal property any be removed from the site without prior written consent from the City Building Official. Consent to remove personal property shall only be granted at the reasonable discretion of the Building Official, and only in cases of hardship after: Page 8 of9 1. A City approved environmental hazard testing and cleaning firm has advised the City, in writing, that the item(s) of personal property can be sufficiently cleaned to remove all harmful contamination; and 2. The owner of the personal property agrees in writing: a. That the owner is aware of the danger of using the contaminated property; and b. That the owner will thoroughly clean the property to remove all contamination prior to the use of the property; and c. That the owner releases and agrees to indemnify the city, its Staff, and the City Council from all liability to the owner and/or third persons for injuries or damages caused, or alleged to have been caused, by the contaminated property. Section 16. Violations and Penalties. Any person violating any provision of this ordinance is guilty of a misdemeanor and upon conviction shall be subject to the penalties set forth in Minnesota Statute ~ 609.02, Subd. 3. Section 17. Effective Date. The effective date of this Ordinance shall be after its passage and publication according to law. Adopted by the Centerville City Council this Mayor, Terry Sweeney City Clerk Published in the Quad Community Press on Page 9 of9 WATER TOWER FEASffiILITY REPORT FILE NO. 616-03-130 CENTERVILLE, MINNESOTA Terry Sweeney Mayor Linda Broussard-Vickers Council Member Mary Capra Council Member Tom Lee Council Member Jeff Paar Council Member Kim Moore-Sykes City Administrator Paul Palzer Public Works Director BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC. ENGINEERS AND ARCHITECTS ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA .~ H...........;...-................ 1\11 Bonestroo Rosene .Anderlik & 'Associates ...Eng!Q~~rs&i~~"~hitects ;" .,.,', '.;'-,: <,:,\~~~,-,,: :~:> :':"}:; -:-?~.:;!.~'_'~:,,;~t ~ '. -, > ~,- _. - ~ Bonestroo. Rosene. Anderllk and Associates. Inc. Is an Affirmative Action/Equal OpportUnity Employer and Employee Owned . Principals: Otto G. Bonestroo. P.E. . Marvin L Sorvala. P.E. . Glenn R. Cook, P.E. . Robert G. Schunlcht, P.E. . Jerry A. Bourdon, P.E. . Mark A. Hanson, P.E. Senior Consultants: Robert W. Rosene, P.E. . Joseph C. Anderllk, P.E. . Richard E. liJrner. P.E. . Susan M. Eberlin, C.P.A. Associate Principals: Keith A. Gordon. P.E. . Robert R. Pfefferle. P.E. . Richard W. Foster, P.E. . David O. ~oskota, P.E. . Michael T. Rautmann, P.E. . Ted K. Field. P.E. . Kenneth P. Anderson. P.E. . Mark R. Rolfs. P.E. . David A. Bonestroo, M.B.A. . Sidney P. Williamson, P.E., LS. . Agnes M. Ring. M.BA . Allan Rick Schmidt, P.E. . Thomas W. Peterson, P.E. . James R. Maland, P.E.. Miles B. Jensen, P.E.' L Phillip Gravel III, P.E. . Daniel J. Edgerton, P.E. . Ismael Martinez, P.E. . Thomas A. Syfko, P.E. . Sheldon J. Johnson' Dale A. Grove, P.E.' Thomas A. Roushar, P.E. . Robert J. Devery, P.E. Offices: St. Paul. St. Cloud, Rochester and Wlllmar, MN . Milwaukee, WI . Chicago, IL Webslte: www.bonestroo.com --,'- :r::~' ~ ' ~ "-, --,;.:~:,;,:~~: :'.~ ',' ':;i>:.', Y.: ',>.:?' '__ ,-X~;~i;:j,::~y.:~;>i.:,,;.~~~S'~:"~_,_:. ~S~. J .-: ~., ')""Honorable MayoFand!Cityi!€ouncil D.~City of C.e~~~:; ". ..' '.io':~:;.':>.;o' ............1880 Mam.Str~t'........,.;f";.....,.;.,i.. . ., cen~:I~{~~~~~L'i~r;~':~;,':;,.1.~~~;" Re:W'~TQw.er~~iW~~Rt,p()rt cc. <.' '.. ..' ;...Bfutestfc)o\:~i1~~~V6>1~-130 .....~...:.":~:'+~~::"~~."~,. ~ : :~ :'~; . ,. ~ ~., .' 'J .,:;;B~~~-~t:':>_.:-:<~:E::: '>~3~:,O::-l' Dear Mayiiran:d?$tY Cbuncil: ..)~!..,;:,c<:~:.".,C~~L'.. "0 ..:......c:c ... . ......;..;(;;.!,;;:(~~?:,}~';.i'f\~~~g':},Ji~'.~r'. :. Transmittedhere~ith is 0%ftk.sl~mtl;fWon:foktliejJJ."op()sed500,OOO Gallon Water Tower improvement for the Citygi?[~ent~~j~~:JllieLi~~r!tow~i:istt>lJe located on the Public Works site on the weit~iPe~9$20~';~~~~;No~,.appi9imlateJ.~500 feet south of Main Street. .! :". :/:;;:';";\::'~i.':i.;......:...'...:.......!.::.'.....'...r.;.....',...~.'.....~.:.:.:.!..kp,.~h'.},!... .:;. ;n.;c;>{),~'F.:s" ", ~'- ,~,. - - - .}~:;;~'~~~~-;:~~/~:.:<.::-'-'::~; " ',- _ ., r-:~"--;~:::--:~-':-';'-> This report recommends 500,000 gallons of erevatedwater:~rageaNhe.site. The recommended high water elevation of the water tower is,1054.5"'Tl1reealtemative types. of water towers are evaluated in this report:; Trunk.... waterm~.. .siZerecOJIlInelldatio.'.l1S are also presented. Costs for the work outlined in this-report have.beeIl.compjledand:~p:resented for consideration by the City CounciL ' . , " We would be pleased to m~t with the City Council and Staff at any m.utWinycori~e:nieilf .' time to review thecontc:mts of thisr~~ort. Respectfully submitted, BONESTROO,ROSENE,Al'IDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC. ':~:'. '-- ",;" ", "", Mark R. Rolfs, P .E. lhereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct "suP~~~Q:n '. and that I am a duly Licensed ..P1'ofessiofial Engineer under the laws of the State of. Minnesota. MarkR. Rolfs, P.E. 2335 West Highway 36 II St. Paul, MN 55113 D 651-636-4600 II Fax: 651-636-1311 Date: August 20. 2003 Reg. No. 16722 TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Contents INTRODUCTION AND RECOMMENDATIONS Introduction Recommendations Figure 1 - Existing and Proposed Storage Locations WATER TOWER SIZE AND TYPE REQUIREMENTS Water Tower Sizing TYPE OF RESERVOIR Elevated Storage Ground Storage and Booster Station DEMAND ANALYSIS Table No. 1 - Demand Analysis Graph Table No.2 - Pressure Comparisons Alternative Evaluation and Recommendation 3 5 5 6 7 8 8 9 9 9 10 11 12 13 14 14 14 16 16 17 17 17 SITE ANALYSIS General Soils Investigation Site Size Requirements Site Access Elevations Trunk Water Mains Telemetry Hydraulic Performance 18 ., Table No.3 - Fire Flow Modeling Results 20 Figure 2 - Existing Water Main System 24 Figure 3 - Ultimate Water Main System 25 Tank Freezing 26 Future Well Consideration 26 AESTHETIC CONSIDERATIONS 28 Style of Elevated Reservoir 28 Composite Tanks 29 Figure 4 - Fluted Column Water Tower 31 Figure 5 - Waterspheroid Water Tower 32 Figure 6 - Composite Water Tower 33 Site Aesthetics 34 Figure 7 - December Sun Shadows 35 Figure 8 - June Sun Shadows 36 COST AND SCHEDULE 37 Table 4 - Estimated Tank Costs 37 0.5 MG Water Tower Cost Estimate 38 Scheduling 39 Potential Water Tower Schedule 39 Introduction and Recommendations Introduction This report reviews the expansion of Centerville' water system through the addition of a 500,000 gallon elevated water tower and trunk water mains. This tower is needed to adequately serve the City as it develops towards saturation and expands into the next decade. The tower is also needed to: · maintain an effective balance between supply and storage, · increase and provide reliable fire flow capabilities within the water distribution network, especially on the outer fringes of the City, · provide a stable hydraulic basis for the operation of the water system, and · maximize efficiency within the water distribution network with the adjacent water system in Lino Lakes. This report reviews the construction of a water tower on City owned property next to the City Public Works Facility on 20th Avenue. Three factors were involved in choosing the size and type of water tower to be constructed - cost, reliability, and system operation. These factors are reviewed in this report. The location of the existing storage site and proposed tower are shown on Figure 1. Construction of this water tower is consistent with recommendations from the 1997 Comprehensive Water Plan prepared by MSA Consulting Engineers. The 1997 Plan recommended a 400,000 gallon tower be constructed by the year 2000 to give the City a total storage of 500,000 gallons. This report verifies the planned system expansion and recommends that a 500,000 gallon tower be constructed with the high water level raised 6.5 feet to match the water level of the City of Lino Lakes water system, and recommends that the City's existing water tower be removed from the system. The report also looks briefly at the expansion of supply to meet the anticipated future maximum day demand. Water Tower Feasibility Report 5 Recommendations From an engineering standpoint, the work presented in this report is feasible. The water tower is necessary in the near future to serve the City. The Staff and Council will need to review and analyze the financial aspects of the proposed work. The following recommendations are offered for City Council consideration: 1. This report should be adopted as the official guide for the water tower described herein. This report should supplement the data contained in the 1997 Comprehensive Water Plan. 2. A 500,000 gallon water tower with a high water elevation of 1054.5 should be constructed. 3. At a minimUm, bids should be received on fluted column and water spheroid water towers to allow a comparison based on as-bid costs. Additionally, the City could look at the composite style of tank, but this would likely cost more for this size of tank. A City Council decision regarding tank type will be required before awarding the contract. 4. The tower should be constructed on the existing City owned site at the Public Works Facility since it offers the lowest overall cost. The estimated total project costs for the water tower is between $1,000,000 and $1,100,000. 5. The water tower project will require approximately 18 months to complete. Project completion is required by July 2005. 6. Preparation of a wellhead protection plan in accordance with the rules should be considered. Planning for siting a new well should begin soon when maximum day demands get closer to the well supply firm capacity of 0.9 MOD (625 gpm). Before the well is to be drilled, the City needs to do an aquifer study to make sure the new well can be supported at the existing Well No.2 field. Water Tower Feasibility Report 6 D: ......II:mIIliIJll...1\ i' !I I I, !i 'I I. f! Ii, ii II " !j ~ I .' ~ " , I I J~ ill f i I I I I j j i I I I I i f- I I ."..__1 -..f. I I 1 T j I I -I I ~i ~I r---- :1 J Wi Ji!I' ,:1 .i! i -!ff--+'" .;; I ~ Q -a. d=>> Zs ~a. ~m . ~!Ii: \ hit! ~J ~ Z < 2 m III ~ kI IIU D: i2 ~ -I I C) I Z ~J ~ . I i1 __..__.__._._____n ----.- ---_..._--~---------- I i J-'- . '1-- ~1H'- Water Tower Size and Type Requirements Water Tower Sizing Sizing of the elevated water reservoir required a complete analysis of the Centerville water system. The 1997 analysis determined that a 400,000 gallon elevated tower should be constructed in the City in conjunction with the existing 100,000 gallon elevated tower. New and future home and business construction will cause a corresponding increase in water use. The existing 100,000 gallons of storage contained in the one elevated reservoir is not adequate to meet current water use and storage requirements. The 1997 analysis estimated that the saturated year 2020 would use about 0.93 million gallons per day (MOD) on a peak day and 0.34 MOD on average. Average daily water use in the City, however, has increas.ed gradually since the 1997 report and is currently about 0.22 MOD. The real difference between the actual use and projected use is that the maximum day usage has peaked around 0.60 MOD over the last five years. Even with the new data, we feel that the ultimate average daYgemand will be 0.53 MOD with a corresponding maximum day demand of approximately 1.5 MOD. Based on the criteria of providing storage to meet 30% of the maximum demand, the required additional storage is 400,000 MO or if you consider removing the existing tower from the system, 500,000 MO. Water Tower Feasibility Report 8 Type of Reservoir There are two types of water storage facilities possible at the proposed site - surface storage with booster pumps and gravity feed elevated reservoirs. There are three major factors to be considered when selecting the type of water storage facilities for Centerville - cost, reliability and system operation. Each of these factors is discussed in detail in the following paragraphs. Elevated Storage Elevated storage reservoirs consist of a tank supported above the ground by a tower. The height of the tower depends on the system's high water level and on the ground elevation at the construction site. The height of water in the tank provides pressure on the distribution system. Water flows by gravity out of the tank when the pressure in the system is low. The tank :fills when the pressure in the distribution system is. greater than the water level in the tank. Elevated storage is a safe source of water during emergencies and power outages, since the water will flow by gravity to the point of demand. An elevated water tower has the advantage of being virtually 100 percent reliable and easier to operate than a surface reservoir with booster pumps. The height of water in the tank is always connected to the water system and the chances of anything happening to make this storage unavailable to the distribution system is very remote. Ground Storage and Booster Station A ground storage reservoir requires a booster station to pump water into the distribution system. The reservoir fills at night through a pressure reducing valve and relies on booster station pumps to provide pressure during the day. A ground storage reservoir with booster station has many mechanical components that can and will fail during the life of the structure. The booster station would be designed with multiple pumps and an emergency generator to help reduce the likelihood of a complete booster station failure, but the chances of booster station failures are still much higher than elevated tank failure. Water Tower Feasibility Report 9 DEMAND ANALYSIS As mentioned previously, a water demand analysis was performed for the time period since 1997. This analysis was done to compare data used in the 1997 report to data that has been generated to date. Refer to Table No.1, which shows a comparison of the data for the last 6 years. It shows that the average day demands have tracked somewhat below the projected average day demands, and that the peak demands have also tracked below the projected peak demands. Peak demands are influenced primarily by new development and weather. We feel that the 1997 report contained inadequate projected flows for the Commercial and Industrial areas for demand projections in the ultimate system. The lack of Commercial and Industrial developments since 1997 could be the reason that the demands have tracked below the projected demands in the last few years. Large users and houses are expected to continue to increase demand considerably over the next few years, and if this expansion coincides with a hot, dry summer, then higher peak demands will begin to occur. For this reason, we do not concur the report data from the 1997 report can still be used and thus, the recommended inclusion of a 500,000 gallon water reservoir can be justified. Water Tower Feasibility Report 10 Table No.1 Centerville, MN Pumping Records Water Pumped (millions of gallons) Month 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 January 1.890 2.197 2.733 3.942 7.879 4.599 February 1.687 2.111 2.663 3.454 6.279 4.348 March 1.918 3.012 3.222 3.610 6.892 3.824 April 2.159 3.058 3.291 3.999 3.857 4.389 .Mav 2.852 4.289 4.057 8.658 5.718 7.487 June 5.723 4.286 6.359 6.231 6.506 6.319 Julv 2.373 6.494 7.661 8.615 12.812 12.070 Au2USt 3.622 4.309 6.325 11.667 11.269 7.205 September 3.015 6.940 5.650 6.825 6.934 6.842 October 2.721 8.466 4.496 8.364 5.329 5.099 November 2.077 3.058 4.191 3.755 4.088 3.979 December 2.429 3.038 3.579 9.341 4.137 5.049 'JotaI (MGIYR) 32.466 51.258 54.227 78.461 81.700 71.210 Max Month 5.723 8.466 7.661 11.667 12.812 12.070 Ave: Month 2.706 4.272 4.519 6.538 6.808 5.934 Min Month 1.687 2.111 2.663 3.454 3.857 3.824 Max Dav (MGD) 0.316 0.362 0.415 0.600 0.510 0.491 Ave: Dav (MGD) 0.089 0.140 0.149 0.215 0.224 0.195 MaxIMin Dav Factor 3.55 2.58 2.79 2.79 2.28 2.52 Population Served 1,205 1,350 2,476 3,050 3,550 3,700 Per Capita Use 73.8 104.0 60.0 70.5 63.1 52.7 1997 Re;r Projections I Max Da~ (MGD) I A v Da (MGD) 008051 0.292 Water Tower Feasibility Report 11 The model used in the 1997 report was updated to include all new trunk mains added to the system since the old report. Prior to .this model upgrade, field hydrant flow tests were performed at three locations on portions of the City's water sytem. A hydrant was opened to create a demand on the system, the flow from the hydrant was determined, and the residual pressure for that flow rate was measured from a nearby downstream hydrant. This data was then compared with the model. Demands equal to the flows generated at the opened hydrants were incorporated into the model at the same locations. From this, a residual pressure was determined from the model. The following Table No.2 shows the comparison of the actual field test data and the model data in respect to both the static and residual pressures. Refer to Figure 1 for the locations of the nodes. Table No.2 - Pressure Comparisons Street Static Pressures Residual Pressures Node Location Actual Model Actual Model J-96 Lakeland Circle 60-66 62.8 48 30.4 J-380 Beaver Pond Way 56-58 55.9 46 46.8 J410 Deer Pass Drive 55 54.6 46 46.8 As you can see from the data collected and generated in the above table, the pressures compare very favorably for two nodes but the residual pressure at Node J-96 (Lakeland Circle) did not. We cannot determine why the pressures for this node were better in the field than per the model. An extra looped water main that may have been missed or water main sizes shown too small would account for the extra pressure, but sizes and pipes were checked and confrrmed by City staff. Another possible explanation to the residual pressures being higher in the field is that possibly one of the wells actually came on during the flow test which caused a greater reading in 1;he field. The updated computer model is validated by the results of the actual field measurements for the other flow data. Water Tower Feasibility Report 12 Alternative Evaluation and Recommendation Using the evaluation criteria of cost, reliability, and system operation, we recommend constructing an elevated water tower at the Centerville Public Works site. Elevated storage offers more benefits to the overall water system for approximately the same life cycle cost as ground storage. Even with standby pumps and generators, a ground storage system is less reliable than elevated storage. Elevated reservoirs act as buffers on a water system to smooth the pressure fluctuations caused by pumps turning on and off. Perhaps the most significant consideration' of water system operation is the fact that the system benefits the most from a reservoir by providing balanced pressure on the system and control for well pumping. This is the most important argument against choosing the ground storage and booster station facility. Right now, the City has only one tank. Although the existing tank is still operational, repainting of the tank is needed and the cost to repaint are more than the cost of making the new tower 500,000 gallon capacity rather than 400,000 gallons. The old tank could be left unused and dry, as this would decrease corrosion. When maintenance is required on the new tank, the old tank could be disinfected and put back into service as a backup. However, with the interconnection to the Lino Lakes water system, the Centerville system could be fed from Lino Lakes during times when the new tower is out of service for maintenance or an emergency. Therefore, the existing 100,000 gallon tower could be demolished and removed if the City so chooses. The removal of the existing tower would take only a week or so of demolition construction and it is estimated to cost approximately $15,000 to remove. The new tower high water level is recommended to be raised 6.5 feet from the old tower to match the elevation of the Lino Lakes water towers. By raising the tower to match Lino Lakes water towers, the two systems will be compatible and can be used in conjunction effectively without loss of storage by either system. This raising of the tank, however, will make using the existing 100,000 gallon water tower and the proposed water tower in conjunction ineffective. Water Tower Feasibility Report 13 Site Analysis General The 1997 Comprehensive Water Plan recommended a location of the water tower near City Hall. Sufficient room for a tower is not available at this site, so alternate locations were evaluated. In the initial phases of this report, both the City Public Works site and the Cedar Street County Park site were evaluated as shown on Figure 2. Discussions were held with City Council/Staff and the Cedar Street County Site was eliminated due to the extra cost it would take to purchase the property from the County and its location in the extreme southeast comer of the City. Soils Investigation One of the most important site design considerations for an elevated storage reservoir is the allowable soil bearing capacity. .This capacity directly impacts the foundation design and total project cost. Because the site selection was essentially concentrated at one location, it was decided to perform the normal "design phase" soil borings during this report phase. The soil borings that are typically performed during the design phase for an elevated water reservoir consist of three standard penetration test borings. Normally, two of the test borings are taken to a depth of approximately 40-50 feet and the third boring is taken to a deeper depth in the event that a deep foundation system must be utilized. Ideally, an elevated tank rests on a shallow foundation. This shallow foundation consists of a vertical ring wall section supported on top of a wider spread footing foundation. Under this arrangement, it us desirable to have the inlet/outlet pipe protrude through the vertical ringwall portion of the foundation at seven feet of cover. This typically means that the bottom of the spread footing is 13-14 feet below grade. The standard penetration borings show that the primary geological deposit at the site is a glacially deposited till. Till soils generally include classifications of sandy lean clay, clay Water Tower Feasibility R'eport 14 sand, and silty sand. Alluvial soils have been deposited above the till. Some mixed till soils and topsoil also appear above the Till, very likely as fill. Normally, a glacial till can provide adequate support for an elevated tank of this size. That is, Till can normally provide a bearing capacity of 3,000 psf with a total settlement of I" and a differential settlement of approximately ~". These are acceptable soil properties for an elevated water tank foundation. However, based on the labora,tory consolidation testing that was done on the standard penetration boring test samples, the data suggests that this particular (glacial) Till has been significantly over-consolidated by the glaciers as they retreated. Based on the laboratory testing, the total settlement was judged to be on the order of 5". Also based on this testing, the differential settlement was anticipated to be on the order of 2 W'. The differential settlement value is completely unacceptable for an elevated water tower. Beneath the (glacial) Till, the deep boring encountered Dolostone, which appears to be part of the Shakopee formation. The Dolostone was somewhat weathered and could be a gravity deposited rock, but bedrock maps published by the Minnesota Geological Survey indicate that contact with bedrock should be in the vicinity of the depth that the boring indicated. Because the standard penetration borings forced us to conclude that we had unacceptable settlement values, the use of one day's work of an electric cone penatrometer (CPT) was authorized. This allowed the data to include six additional tests to a depth of approximately 45 feet. The goal of the CPT use was to quantify the apparent uniformity of the soft soil in the hope of reducing both the total settlement prediction and more importantly the differential settlement prediction. The results of the CPT testing did, in fact, show that the glacial till at the anticipated foundation depth w~ in fact very uniform. However, it also verified that it was significantly over consolidated. The total settlement prediction was reduced from 5" to only 4" and the differential settlement prediction was reduced from 2 W' to approximately I". Unfortunately, even I" of differential settlement is more than the elevated tank manufacturers will allow. Therefore, it does not appear possible to support the elevated tank on a spread footing foundation. It is recommended that the tank be supported on a deep foundation, or more specifically an end bearing pile foundation. This site is conducive to a reasonable length pile Water Tower Feasibility Report 15 foundation with bearing. The presence of the bedrock means that the piles can be driven to refusal into the bedrock and can achieve a 100 ton capacity with a high degree of certainty. The piles will be either concrete filled pipe piles or H-piles. The exact pile configuration and type will be determined during the design phase of the project. There is an additional advantage to the pile foundation in that the ringwall portion of the foundation will extend to only 6-7 feet below grade. It is anticipated that this excavation will be reasonably dry. The inlet/outlet fill pipe will then go just below this ringwall foundation between two of the piles. If the spread footing were to be considered at a 13-14 foot depth, it is anticipated that significantly dewatering costs would be encountered. Site Size Requirements The minimum area normally required for maintaining an elevated water tower of this size is approximately 250' x 250'. During construction of the tank, an additional100-foot construction easement is desirable on at least 2 sides (a 350' x 350' square site). This gives the contractor room to centrally store excavation materials and fabricated steel plates around the tower. This site is approximately 150 feet wide by 300 feet long. Additional space for construction equipment and material storage will be necessary either south or east of the tank site. Future maintenance on the tower, such as repainting would also require either additional space or extra care in containment. Site Access Site access is required for tank maintenance and storage inside the tank structure. The existing Public Works driveway will provide an excellent access point for the tower, and eliminate the need for a permit from Anoka County. Paving of the lot for parking and for public works use has been included in the cost estimates for the proposed tower project. Water Tower Feasibility Report 16 Elevations The high water elevation of the proposed elevated water reservoir should be rasied 6.5 feet . . above the high water level of the existing tower, to an elevation of 1054.5. This elevation will provide satisfactory pressures in the City and will match the high water level of the Lino Lakes elevated tower system that is interconnected to Centerville' s system. The approximate top of the foundation at the base of the reservoir will be approximately 906.0. Therefore, the height to the high water level of the water tower is 148.5 feet. Trunk Water Mains A short trunk water main from existing piping to the new tower site is required in order to connect the proposed tower to the trunk distribution system. The 10" and 12" trunk water mains along 20th A venue will provide a convenient connection to the existing system and is sized accordingly. A few water services to customers may need to be temporarily discontinued during the connection to the tower. Telemetry The existing telemetry system uses a dedicated phone line from the existing tower and well to a City Hall master system and dialer. Upgrading of the telemetry system should be evaluated at the time of the tower design. A new radio master telemetry system could be centrally located at the Public Works building next to the new tower. The new tower and the wells could be equipped with antennas to send radio signals to the master system. The telemetry system could also be updated to receive signals from all of the lift stations for monitoring and record keeping purposes. The entire radio telemetry system would allow easy monitoring of all systems in the City without relying on a telephone company for service and the radio system would eliminate the monthly charges imposed for the use of the dedicated lines and phone service. Costs for upgrading and updating the telemetry system have not been included in the cost estimate for the new tower. Water Tower Feasibility Report 17 Other Engineering Considerations Altitude Valves Altitude control valves are essential features of any water system that contains multiple water storage reservoirs. Altitude control valves sense the pressure at the valve, which directly corresponds to the level of the water in the tower. Since hydraulic grade lines between supply and storage facilities are never exactly the same, there needs to be some method of allowing for these differences without overflowing either of the towers on the system. By properly setting the altitude control valves, the furthest towers from the supply points can be filled without overflowing the closer towers. For this reason, we propose to install an altitude valve system at the existing elevated water tower if Centerville decides not to remove the tower from the system. This assures that the new tower can be filled without overflowing the lower existing tower. Considerations for the configuration of the altitude valves will be required due to available space and the actual configuration of influent and effluent water mains from the existing elevated tank. Altitude valves are a significant source of water system maintenance and operator time. The ability to avoid the addition of an altitude valve by removing the existing 100,000 gallon tank from service is another reason that this was recommended. Hydraulic Performance A hydraulic analysis was performed to make sure that the results of the 1997 Comprehensive Water Plan were still valid-with respect to this elevated tower and to check interim performance conditions. Concerns over the availability of flows for fire for the City were analyzed. An analysis from the old system was updated and compared with field measurements as shown earlier in this report. Fire flow analysis of the existing system does currently meet most requirements, but the addition of this tank and the looping of dead end water mains will improve the reliability of water for fighting fires in the City. Water Tower Feasibility Report 18 Existing areas of concern include: Houle Circle (Node J-29), Grange View (Node J-32), Lamotte Drive (Node J-350), Clear Ridge (Node J-34), Lakeland Circle and Mount Court. These areas contain six inch water mains or are located on dead end streets, which causes existing fire flows to be just under the 1,000 gpm fire flow requirement. The new tower being 6.5 feet higher will help improve the Houle Circle, Grange View and Clear Ridge deficiencies. However, only increasing the existing main sizes or looping of the dead ends will make these areas surpass 1,000 gpm. The scheduled Peltier Lake Drive water main loop this year will increase the Lakeland Circle and Mound Court fire flows by over 400 gpm for a total over 1,400 gpm. Completing the Peltier Lake Drive water main loop all the way to node J-385 on CSAH 14 will increase the flow over 600 gpm and put the fire flow around 1,675 gpm. Both of these increases are without the new tower. Completing an 8" water main loop to the MCES lift station via Lamotte Drive and Heritage Street, will increase the MCES area in the ultimate system by 1,800 gpm for a total available fire flow over 2,500 gpm. The new tower and mains to the east side CommercialJIndustrial areas will provide fire flows just over 3,500 gpm when entirely interconnected with the Ultimate System. The available fIfe flow for the dead end 8" main to node J-28 on 21st Avenue is only 1,422 gpm. Looping tliat system to node J-I04 on 20th Avenue will increase the frre flow to above 2,500 gpm. Refer to Table No.3 below for a model comparison of the existing sytem fire flows to the ultimate system fire flows. Refer to Figure No.2 and Figure No.3 for the existing and ultimate modeling node locations. Water Tower Feasibility Report 19 Table No.3 - Available Fire Flows Ultimate Existing Available Available Node Fire Flow (gpm) Fire Flow (gpm) Notes: J-1 5,000 5,584 J-2 5,000 5,645 J-3 4,368 5,319 J-4 4,299 6,838 J-5 4,120 6,451 J-6 3,715 7,368 J-7 2,114 3,791 J-8 3,329 10,000 J-9 3,175 3,973 J-lO 4,238 7,048 J-11 4,108 6,408 J-12 3,123 3,739 J-13 3,494 4,001 J-14 4,147 4,503 J-15 3,288 3,810 J-16 3,088 3,787 J-17 2,987 3,753 J-18 2,308 3,371 J-19 2,183 3,570 J-20 1,707 2,154 J-21 3,114 3,902 J-22 2,446 2,926 J-23 2,646 3,068 J-24 2,385 2,673 J-25 2,802 3,232 J-26 3,339 4,037 J:.27 _4,210 4,775 J-28 1,422 3,500 J-29 993 1,053 Restricted Dead End 6" Main J-30 2,500 3,127 J-31 1,488 1,681 J-32 982 1,066 Restricted Dead End 6" Main J-33 1,396 1,596 J-34 910 985 Restricted Dead End 6" Main J-35 1,791 2,430 J-36 1,127 1,196 Water Tower Feasibility Report 20 Node J-37 J-38 J-39 J-40 J-41 J-42 J-43 J-44 J-50 J-51 J-52 J-53 J-54 J-55 J-56 J-57 J-58 J-59 J-60 J-61 HJ_62 J-63 J-64 J-65 J-66 J-67 J-68 J-69 J-70 J-71 J-72 J-73 J-74 J-75 J-76 J-77 J-78 J-79 Existing Available Fire Flow (gpm) 1,892 1,051 1,740 3,034 1,114 3,762 3,066 2,905 3,940 1,554 1,809 1,405 3,713 3,898 3,564 3,211 2,387 2,304 3,309 2,054 1,844 2,061 2,066 3,656 3,398 3,350 3,151 2,646 3,263 3,313 2,333. 2,527 1,161 3,096 3,032 1,577 2,205 1,999 Ultimate. Available Fire Flow (gpm) Notes: 2,891 3,692 3,882 3,946 1,173 6,123 5,941 5,421 6,174 1,709 2,020 1,522 6,064 6,483 5,922 4,109 2,742 2,615 4,475 2,295 2,014 2,835 2,479 6,459 6,064 5,015 5,042 5,722 6,134 5,042 6,320 5,974 1,353 6,011 6,140 1,843 4,981 2,268 Water Tower Feasibility Report 21 Ultimate Existing Available Available Node Fire Flow (gpm) Fire Flow (gpm) Notes: J-80 3,425 5,018 J-81 2,851 3,678 J-82 2,671 4,538 J-83 2,106 2,837 J-84 2,298 3,988 J-85 1,910 2,699 J-89 1,661 3,234 J-92 1,467 2,925 J-93 1,231 2,702 J-94 1,163 2,686 J-95 1,072 2,734 J-96 952 2,235 J-98 1,041 2,694 J-103 4,108 6,740 J-104 3,314 9,085 J-105 2,850 7,217 J-106 2,405 5,671 J-107 3,571 6,209 J-108 2,940 5,023 J-109 3,502 J-305 2,485 6,161 J-31O 2,518 6,226 J-315 2,502 6,292 J-320 2,472 6,280 J-325 2,395 6,292 J-330 2,255 6,059 J-335 2,208 5,596 J-34O 2,653 4,488 J-345 2,498 4,892 J-350 740 2,741 Existing Dead End 6" Main J-355 2,041 6,383 J-360 1,801 4,897 J-365 1,985 6,426 J-370 1,804 5,041 J-375 1,779 5,173 J-380 1,412 3,262 J-385 1,048 2,455 J-390 1,043 2,308 Water Tower Feasibility Report 22 Node J-395 J -400 J-405 J-410 J-415 J-420 J-5oo J-505 J-510 J-515 J-520 J-525 J-530 J-535 J-540 J-545 J-550 J-555 J-560 J-565 J-570 J-575 J -580 J-585 J-590 J-595 J -600 J-605 J -610 J-620 J-625 J-630 J-635 J-64O J-645 J-650 Existing Available Fire Flow (gpm) 1,025 1,008 2,339 1,478 1,340 1,666 Ultimate Available Fire Flow (gpm) Notes: 2,158 2,038 2,769 1,586 3,272 4,166 3,310 2,780 3,030 2,877 2,371 10,000 4,043 6,545 4,772 3,466 6,243 6,269 6,514 6,593 6,638 6,781 4,949 3,636 2,860 2,854 3,386 6,185 5,770 5,600 6,118 5,776 4,617 4,779 6,577 5,165 Water Tower Feasibility Report 23 ....- ~"S"n --, !! . Ii ill "'I i~ ~~ j' . Ii ;. ~I :: \: oil r :11 . I,' ,'L_~ 'I; I i I , I ... ~. I_ I ~,.. I --T-- I "~ ' ',J '!I II " I', j . !l I I' il w~_ !! i . ~ "" . . ,:i, ~~::.~~~..&! i I I I r -'--,- I . I ! ..,. I i '- i I I I I " \;.,'J. >. " 1 .\.~~ -" ,:. hU~ ~i ~"""''''''' ~ NO Q. d::) :~ 2m J ~ en " z I;i i1 1 Ii Ii ~! f z .~ 1;..--. - I 'f-' -- I. , , ~J I I I j i I I I I , i iJ I I ilSt"~JLrJRlUl'Sa II !' I !-'-'--=- i I I I I -~ 1-: .. I '.... I J t.- ! i I I i i i I .."J j i I I I j ! f' I I I , i , I I i I ._..L j I , " ...\~ ,~t'. ..\~ a ". i Uh.. ~I }.::;~:#;fi-" .~_. -., :.i -I ;J -I ~~--- :1 /Ii :tT .;~" i I j ~ ] ! i II I I')~ "~ .;:) III t~ ~ ~s u~a ~ IIU Ji ~a.. .:.J! ...19 ~~ :Ii I ~ ~ ~ ;:) z I ~J '. u"_"_ ------~- I I ..1-' "t ~.' :. r-- ~. Tank Freezing A concern that should be noted for any style or type of tank is the possibility that a tank may have ice formations during extended cold winter days. The freezing of a tank could be threatening to both the tank and the availability of water to th~ system for fIre fIghting. For this reason, we recommend that during the cold winter months, the water level in the tower be lowered, and that the bounce be increased to allow warmer water to mix with the colder water. Additionally, it is recommended that a submersible mixer be installed in the tank to help circulate water and thus reducing ice buildups. Future Well Consideration Water supply for a City should have a total well firm capacity equal to 100% of the maximum day demand. Total fIrm capacity is defIned as the capacity available with the largest well out of service. The ultimate system will require a fIrm capacity for Centerville of about 1.5 MOD or 1,040 OPM. Peak hourly demands are supplied by storage on the system. One well will be required to meet the required ultimate total production capacity of 1.5 MOD. Centerville's current fIrm capacity is near 625 OPM, this is the capacity of Well No. 1. Well No.2 has a capacity of approximately 650 OPM. The current maximum day demand in Centerville is near 0.6 MOD or 420 OPM, which has nearly doubled in the last 5- 10 years. Therefore, the City should consider construction of a new well in the near future. Two current options exist for placement of the new well and should be considered when designing and evaluations are made in the future. The following are the two options to be considered and their advantages or disadvantages. Option 1 - Locate the future well along 20th A venue. The advantage of placing the new well along 20th Avenue is that placement of the well around this location will mean.that the well is on a separate power grid system from the other two wells. The other two wells are located on the Excel Energy system and placement of the new well along 20th A venue will Water Tower Feasibility Report 26 Aesthetic Considerations Style of Elevated Reservoir Three alternate types of water towers are presented in this report. The alternates include a fluted column tank, a water spheroid, and a composite tower. These types of water towers are available in a 500,OOO-gallon size, from at least four independent water storage manufacturers for the steel tanks and two independent water storage manufacturers for the composite tank. Drawings of the alternates are presented on Figures 4 through Figure 6. The fluted column tank and the water spheroid style tanks have been available for many years and are common in the industry. The composite style tank is a more recent addition and is less common. For this reason, the composite style tank is discussed in more detail. A 500,000 gallon fluted column water tower consists of a 57-foot diameter storage tank supported by a single fluted column. The column is approximately 30 feet in diameter and contains the riser pipe connection to the storage tank. A garage door could be installed in the column to allow access and would provide approximately 700 square feet of storage area. A garage door adds approximately $18,000 to the cost of the tank. A fluted column tower is shown on Figure 4. The water spheroid tower has a tubular support pedestal, flared out at the top and bottom. The water storage portion of the tower is approximately 56 feet in diameter. The lower flared portion of the support pedestal would be approximately 24 feet in diameter. . Like the fluted column tower, the water spheroid could be designed with a double door. This would provide approximately 450 square feet of storage area; however, the sides slope inward quickly, so the storage area is not as usable as with the other styles of tanks. Due to the design of this style tank, a garage door is not available on this style of tank. A water spheroid tank is shown on Figure 5. The composite style tank consists of a concrete support column and a steel water storage portion. The concrete support column is approximately 28 feet in diameter and contains the riser pipe connection to the storage tank. The steel water storage portion is approximately Water Tower Feasibility Report 28 50 feet in diameter. An overhead door and condensate ceiling could be installed in the column to allow truck access and would provide approximately 615 square feet of storage area. The composite tank is sh~wn on Figure 6. Composite Tanks The composite style tank support pedestal material is changed from a steel plate material to a reinforced concrete material. The main reason that concrete is used instead of steel is that the pedestal portion of an elevated ta.nf is really a large compression member and concrete is a good material for resisting compressive loads. The water holding compartment is primarily a shell in tension that must contain water without leaking. Steel performs very well in tension, and welded seams make for very leak proof jointing. The overall intent of a composite tank is to use materials of construction that are best suited for the particular task that they are being asked to perform. The capital cost of a composite tank should be higher than the steel tanks. This will be discussed in the cost estimate section of this report. One of the promoted advantages of a composite tanks is that the maintenance costs (i.e. painting costs) of the tank are less than all steel tanks because the concrete pedestal does not need to be painted. This mayor may not be true. In the rawest sense, the City could have an elevated tank with a plain concrete pedestal in which case the maintenance costs would be lower.' But, from an aesthetic point of view a plain concrete pedestal with a painted steel water compartment in certain colors may not be very pleasing. Therefore, it is felt that the concrete pedestal may need to be painted or receive some other surface treatment in order to be aesthetically pleasing and to be comparable with the steel tanks. With this premise, the maintenance cost savings issue tends to be reduced substantially. There would still be some savings, as the interior dry portion of the composite tank could be left unpainted. This would result in an app~o~imate savings of $60,000 every time this portion of the tank had to be painted. The interior dry portion of the tank is also the least severe exposure and it is safe to say that this area is typically painted only every other time that the tank is repainted. Assuming a 15-year general paint life, this means that the interior dry portion of the tank gets painted once very Water Tower Feasibility Report 29 30 years. At an effective rate of return (interest rate minus inflation rate) of 4%, this yields a present worth of approximately $26,000 over a 100 year life of the structure. This value is relatively small in comparison to the overall value of the tank. The last point to be made about composite tanks is the status of any standards governing the design of these styles of tanks. The A WW A (American WatelWorks Association) has been the body that is primarily responsible for setting standards for the elevated tank industry. The A WW A is currently generating a standard for this relatively new style of tank. A Standard does not guarantee the success of an elevated tank; that responsibility rests on the builder and the engineer. A Standard does set a minimum design criteria to be used and ensures that all tank manufacturers are designing to these same minimum criteria The A WW A standard tends to be conservative, but this is an area which conservatism is justified due to the working difficulties involved with actually constructing these tanks and to the catastrophic consequences of failure. Steel tanks constructed since, and in conformance to the A WW A D-lOO Standard, have had an excellent success rate. For these reasons, it is recommended that bids not be received on the composite style of water tank for this project. Water Tower Feasibility Report 30 '."-.. ,... .'.'_~.'''-'''.'."-"....,,..-...,-.~..- ...-..-....-, ....\- ,.'--'~ .'.,.........' "'~,.'.'..h-\;". ,:;-_:> -.... :",.,....'. .....;.. C....__ ,-'........ ........,. - -._ '-. ..' ....,.'-',.."'''-_.l..\~.o ,-..-.... .~......... . .,.~~......._.,"".......',_,..~"._,.J",..-~,...~...........-"........:.:.-.....'-,~ 0' """-'''-h",~,''..l,I.. -,:",,,,.'_.~','''''''''-'.''''''''_'''. -_.....;.,,'-_,-_I~'-""....,...,,'U->..:..-=--\.u.;.;...,),l 57' -0. " ~ ~ ELEV. 1054.5 HIGH WATER UNE , CENTERVILLE N ,., ~ / ELEV. 1022.5 LOW WATER UNE j.. - .- - . co J ic v .... - ELEV. 906.0 I' I, 30' TOP OF FOOTING FLUTED COLUMN WATER TOWER .11. Bonestroo ~ Rosene 8 Anderlil< & 1\1' Associates CENTERVILLE, MINNESOTA FIGURE 4 500,000 GALLON WATER STORAGE FACIUlY 61603130R01.DWG JULY 200.3 COMM. 616-0.3-130 56' ELEV. 1054.5 HIGH WATER UNE CENTERVILLE R co I j.... ,.., ELEV. 1017.0 LOW WATER UNE '10' R co I ixl ~ .... m .- ELEV. 906.0 TOP OF FOOTING I, 23.5' I I WATERSPHEROID WATER TOWER' .11. Bonestroo ~ Rosene 8 Anderlil< & 1\11 Associates CENTERVILLE. MINNESOTA FIGURE 5 500.000 GALLON WATER STORAGE FACILITY 61603130R01.DWG JULY 2003 COMM. 616-03-130 u.L '_~h .,.....-.-,...............~ .-, -".-. _...,--,- "'n... -.... .--.',.\.....,'-,,,,,-_. '-.' -.-. .......,..._.... ,_, . '_'.'" ....."..'... "........." ,.._....~.....",.. ~,',_~~l...:..-..._........_ ..._. .'"'''_''''''''.''' ."'...".......~'..".""~,~,.'_...,...,,.,' ,~,.>.."...,~" ,~._,..,. _,.__,...""....,..,,, '., u... ,.'U=.J_"".........,~\'~.l.i>L..:! SO' , I , , I , I I I I I I \ , "' \\ aEV. 1054.5 HIGH WATER UNE aEV. 1017.0 LOW WATER UNE 28' .1 ELEV. 906.0 TOP OF FOOTING COMPOSITE WATER TOWER D co I ;... I"') CENTERVILLE, MINNESOTA FIGURE 6 500,000 GALLON WATER STORAGE FACITILY 61603130R02.DWG JULY 2003 COMM. 616-03-130 D co I io ""'" .- J[lj Boneatroo Rosene R Anderlllc 4 . \J 1 Associates Site Aesthetics Figures 7 and 8 shows the proposed water tower location per lot dimensions. Although the tower cannot be hidden from view, several methods will make the tower blend with the surrounding property. These methods include landscaping and screening, ornamental designs and painting schemes. The amount of landscaping and screening desired depends on an aesthetic value judgement made by the adjoining property owners. No attempt has been made in this report to estimate these potential costs. Shadows cast by the proposed water tower have been analyzed and are summarized on Figures 7 and 8. As shown, shadows will periodically cover,some of the adjacent residential properties and businesses. The longest shadows occur during the winter months when the sun achieves the least altitude above the horizon. Note that the longest shadows are cast in the early morning and late evening when the intensity of the shadows is diminished and therefore less noticeable. Water Tower Feasibility Report 34 2 i I 13 , . ! j o 11.......0II 100 200 Scala In 'eet MAIN STREET / C.S.A.H. NO. 14 ///// / / " 20'" , I \ /-, , \ I I \, ._, I I " r I I 2,' (1 I I ,\ 12' ,',' 101 I I , "'>0' I 0 I I ~ I , \ I 2 , " /'l~ I ',~ ' ~ , I I I t"\~ I // , , ~ , I . V I // " , ,I I I // ~ , , ,I I I " // ~<? // " ..Q'~' \ I I " I / / ',V"Af/A = '" 1 1// / '...:'" ,., " II /' // , , '" \I ,,/ I , ..-- , I,A/1 I // ~1 , ~ I / \.'1 " ' 0' I // ,~t/ 0 Z 19 " ., I- , ..u ' " 8 ", o ~ z o l- I- o U 3 18 17 16 . I <( (f) U DECEMBER SUN SHADOW ///// // ~/ / ,. // // // / / // / 2 3 . . : l "II l l l I / l .. : l // Ii I I l ; /; l : . I :' I I :' :' :' // :' I I I i ,/ i i :' i l : . fl. Bonestroo ~ Rosene U Anderfik & . \J. Associates Engineers & Architects CENTERVILLE. MINNESOTA WATER TOWER WATER STUDY FIGURE 7 SUNSHADOWS.DWG DATE: July, 2003 COMM: 61603130 ''-.I 16 MAIN S TR EE T ..-- 20 ~ :3 N U 2 0 19 4 Z J: <( (f) U ! j 0 100 200 I............J Scale in leet C.S.A.H. NO. 14 "l",,".._- " ,,' . (' i 2 4PM :3 ...... ...... ... 6 ...- .....~........... PM ................... .................... ....." ...- I ,/ i .........."""-., ,/ / . . l : . . . . . . : : , . . " ... .: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. i ._ _ _____i~/..__.__._. _ -.. JUNE SUN SHADOW ~ Bonestroo Rosene G Anderlik & . \J. Associates Engineers & ArchltBcts CENTERVILLE, MINNESOTA WATER TOWER WATER STUDY FIGURE 8 SUNSHADOWS.DWG DATE: July, 2003 COMM: 61603130 m. _.__~_......u. ..,..,_. .. _.___.._ . .... .~_.___.. .'L ........, ............. __. ._.. '_". _~. _.-......._....,...... __.....,_...... ____..._. ._ ......._." ~_.. " ...... ._...._."'~........ . ;""._ ;..,..."......'....."""".~'--~--..~ Cost Estimates It is recommended that the City receive bids on whichever style of steel water tower the community opinion is strongly in favor of. It would be possible to bid more than one style of tank. Bids would be received for major options such as a truck door, a condensate ceiling and a concrete floor. These alternatives should provide informative water tower bid costs for the City Council to consider. After receiving the bids, the Council and Staff will need to evaluate the functional, financial, and aesthetic value of the water tower alternatives. Table 4. Estimated Tank Costs (500,000 Gallon) Tank 20% Eng.. Legal. Total T~ Costs Admin.. Etc. Cost .~ Spheroid $840,000 $168,000 $1,008,000 Fluted Column $855,000 $173,000 $1,028,000 Composite $905,000 $181,000 $1,086,000 Water Tower Feasibility Report 37 ~ 500,000 Gallon Water Tower Cost Estimate Water Fluted Composite Spheroid Column Tower - Foundation, Fabrication, $710,000 $735,000 $775,000 Erection, Painting Site Work - Water Main, Access 90,000 90,000 90,000 Driveway, Pave Parking Lot Electrical and Controls 40,000 40,000 40,000 Total Estimated Construction 840,000 865,000 905,000 20% Engineering, Legal, 168,000 173,000 181.000 Administrati ve Total Estimated Cost i~JW8,0~ $).,038,000 $1,086,0.On Options available on Fluted Column Tower and Composite style towers. Double Pedestrian Door $5,000 Overhead Garage Door $18,000 Condensate Ceiling $7,000 Concrete Floor $5,000 The Spheroid style tower could also include an option for a Double Pedestrian Door but it would be estimated to be near $7,500 to include. Water Tower Feasibility Report 38 Scheduling ~ It is difficult to complete large water towers in one construction season due to the relatively short painting season available in our climate. A 500,000 gallon tower will require approximately 18 months to complete after the start of construction. This is due to the fact that by the time the tank is erected, the weather is not acceptable for painting. Assuming that this tower is bid in the winter of 2003-2004, construction can be completed during 2004 and the painting of the tank can occur during the spring and early summer of 2005. The tower should be in-service by mid-summer of 2005. Potential Water Tower Schedule Complete Feasibility Report Public Hearing Council Authorize preparation of construction Plans & Specifications Approve Plan and Specifications Send in Ad to newspaper Bid Award Begin Construction: Foundation Steel Paint Fill Tower August, 2003 September, 2003 September, 2003 January, 2004 January, 2004 February, 2004 February, 2004 May 2004 to June 2004 July 2004 to March 2005 (not continuous) May '2005 to mid-July 2005 July 2005 Water Tower Feasibility Report 39 .' MEMO To: Honorable Mayor Sweeney and City Council From: Paul Palzer, ~Jic Works ~dingeffici~ Re: Emergency Generator ............................... .'.~..--. .,._.;,,:i.,~'.'..................... .'........ I have requested quotes from three ven~atta"~ two of them on the 18th to provide quotes for the emergency generatp~ ,~Of;Friday, only Ziegler has responded with a quote and the other two promisecf:tIlptb~<le a quote by the 21st. " Ziegler has some used units with the pri~:teff~~in the hours on the machine. All of these have been maintained by Ziegler ~'".:rid,1leYoe from Zielger stated they can also set us up with the necessary ext~.~8ri.d.plug. I have not had the opportunity to physically go out and seetHe Units to make a judgment on which one I would recommend. I am requesting that the Council approve up 00$20,000.00 for the purchase of a ~ unit Ji'om Ziegler and the necessary electrical connections to operate aU of the lift stations. r ,r. ~. ?-" ,,' ;l.' W , ~. ~: i, lllJ. i ~ m' )t. . JUL-14-0:1NON 02: 05 PM ZIEGLER POWER SYSTEMS :P" ~ FAX NO. 952 887 4522 p, 01 :ZIIILERII IllBeR.PDWER SYSTEMS 8050 SlaleHlghway 101 Shakopee. MN 55379 9521887-4536. 888/3204292 Pax: 952.887-4522 FAX COVER PAGE To: Paul Date: July 14. 2003 Time: 1 :59 PM Fax: 6S] 429.8629 Conlpany: City ofCentCfV1lle Subjeow Portable Emergency Generator From: JllCk'DeYoe ~~mail: jack.deyoc@2iiealorcat.~m Phone: 952/8874536 Pages Sent (including this page) Comments: PauL Per our conversation oftWs al\omoon On tha topic: of Portable Emergency Generator to backup up your different lift stations please note the follQwmg: Bns<<l on your load requirements of 120/240 3 phase~ 2171480 3 phase. and 1201240 1 phase with motors loads of a mnxfm\UJ1 (2) 10 UP (across the Une start). you would requlro Ii 40 kW generalor minimum. With that in mind we do have to o(fersever;al used "Rental" units in this size. Cost will vary based on the nwnber of hours anr4 age of the unit. Each one ofthesc "Rental" units can provide m\lltiple voltage outputs a:nd can be hooked up to cables and a quiek disconnect plug (per YOUT SpocUiCfltion). These units also havo a sub-based fwI tank. trailer, and sound attenuated enclosure, Exanlple ofwhat's available as follows: 1). Model DCA4S built in 1999 with 1,510 ooW'S.@$lO.OOO.OO 2). Model DCA45 bullt in 1999 with 6,325 hours@ $12,500.00 3). Modol DCA45 built in 1999 with5~(i50ihoUi'S @$l~,sOO.oo To these units we could add 1he cabling and plugs Cat additional cost) /" In closing ploosed look over the aLtached dntasheets that covers tho products being offered. Each of lhcse uniLs have been maiutaincdand serviced by ZicBlcr since now. Any qUOS1ions ploase call. Until m~ ~. oc ~. W.. ~ 1\'>,,'S'e; iI~ll'.t .:tJ<S\I~~"'::- CiI:1L~ ~OI-/)(ETo .l'I-ar8; . \\ ~N'O ~c.~ ~.., ... From fixed standby power sources to mob;!e construction app/lcatJonsJ MQ Power's Wh;sperWatt portable generators will meet your most demanding requirements. They're ruggedly buill and have every imaginable performance faalure, control and operator convenience. All internal parts are shock mounted to a heavy. steel frame. for minimum vibration and extended service IIfe,Jlfi, standard weather resistant steel housing provldes~mplete protection and is soundproofed. enabling operation at noise levels substantlally lower than competitive designs. This makes WhisparWatt the perfect c~ice tor standby power at hospnals, factorIes and schools. WhlsperWatts are powered by fue~elflclent dIesel engines offering long servlce life and low mamtenance :equlrements; Full instrumentation tneludes all necessary engine and: ~ generator monitoring functions. WhisperWatt models are available in many configurations with output power up to 800 KVA. ftJIG Power Decibel Levels ! Our soundproof housing allows subslantially lower operating noise leveis than competftlve desIgns. WhisperWatts are at home on construction MSS, In .resldential , l1$lghbOmooas, and at hospitalS,... Just about anywhere. (., G>-Silbway~rucl< traffic (!l.A~arage cily Ir.1llic ~:~~~ij ~."r cDnditlonet al20 t~et .:.... :;:p-NOm1UI t:Qnvltrsauon . VoItage change miide slmptiii. . Three. pDsltlon selectDr swltah makes generator compallb(e WIth most every . /Qb. Swilch Is protected by a IDt:klbIe pansL (~iI Silencsd, weather rsslstant stee' hdll$ing. Single pclnt tiffing bell. MO Powsr's patented open-delta design provIdes virtually unlimited excitation current frJr maximum motor starting . frrd other heavy loads. r,o ~t'll, ; Reversf flow cqolmg. c;ompltlte pt)W9I' paMl. &mn.s~ge ~WfWCC8t p,l/It lor diribUIty and weather ptateOf/on. ,r .~ ./ . Mbdef'DCA-7OSSJU 7d'KVA SfMJdby; 70 KVA Prime Output II . " ftVhispervValt Standard Features ::J Excellent voltage regulation - power is controlled within 1% of mean voltage. rl Simultaneous sIngle and three phase power. 3 Complete power panel. Fully covered; three-phase terminals and singh! phase receptacles allow last and convenient nookup for most applications Including temporary power boxes, tools and lighting equipment. All are NEMA standard, 1.2 Voltage selector switch or voltage reconnect boai'd. Easy to change voltages as you~ applications rsqulre. 2ll Complete instrumentation. . !lI Brushless generator design. Reduces servioe and maIntenance requirements. ]I Diesel powered. :! Automatic safety shutdown system. Monitors the engine oil pressure and water temperature; warning lights Indicate abnormal conditions. 3d Silenced, weather resistant steel housing. Standard baffles and Insulallon to reduce operating noise levels to as low as 62 db(A) at 23 feet. .:] Easy maintenance design. Quick. direct access to aU filters. External fluid drain extensions allow fast, easy service.. l;I Internal1uel tank. Direct reading fuel gauges are standard. )] Illuminated instrument panel. !l Fully lockable enclosure. Allows safe unattended operation, "! Highway-legal trailers available. For simple and safe transporta.tlon; extra capacity fuel cells Ilso available, Slmp/IJ Nsy-tD4ead Instrument panel provides quick, accurate InftJrmatlon about both generator and engine perlDrmsncs. e~glne lnmmantatlon: JfAmmeter ; 11 on pressure gauge JI'Water temperature gaU919 lIII Taohometerlhour meter . Keyed start switctl 'I Preheat indicator II Emerg.ency sl'lutdown rnonl~rs and controls Genarator Instrumentation: !I Voltage regJJalor con Iral ]I Phase selector switch JiI Voltmeter Jl Am~ter ]I Frequency mater !II PllollIghl II Circuli breaker o () / ~ f; ~~8$ . SMiJmion L~ A SIlIndlty Output Pdme OUlpul GOlltIIilIor RPM VoIIDgQ ... 3 p/lllll1I Vall. - sittgIs pnllG8 Arm4Iwt COMOGIIan :"=:b~ - "-'.".... FI'8q\Ienq !IIIaIIVon 22":W [27.S KVAl 2llKW (is KVAl 3i.4~ (W KVAI 3\11ffl (4$ ~JA) +pole St~ MIll AVA W!<W OOKW eal\W ~8 IWA) (75 Kl/Aj (110 !<VA) 4&KW IlaI(W BOW (GO !<VA) (7OKVA) (100 :<VA) 1SfJ) .. 13:2 kW (165 !<VA) 120 1M t 150 KVAI :it1'l'. zas. 220,2<10..416, '-to, Il80V Bw~ble - . 120.127. 139. 240. 254, '07V ~ Slat \lItIt neUlhlll ~M!I =1.5% -. ~ ~=- J j 0.8 l5O~ a.F SlanIng S\'81Dll1 E1ettrlC G 4~ ~ 4-I:yol8 WIW~Jed WlIIat oGOIed waor fOCI&d lle$lgn Wiler CcoIGd D!Md injGcIla~ Clr$ll~ SWIrl cI'I9MI:l6r Droet!tilallJOlI 1I.fbcchitcged 11nImcIliII'ged I =---1 DIsplacement 23S0llC suecc &*ce 4SlKlcc 6724= 6724cc ND. r:yJ!nde1i .. B .II e S 6 IIlIII J $1toktt (nn) eu 102 102 x 1IA 1~~ 125 10h 127 1m x 111' 10E x 127 110 ~ las liP At RaIId 9pead 31 57 Tl 90 129 ISO 140 111III link ~ 1'T2(a1) ~.;IQt;} a3(124.9l 10 (l51.4) 63 (236.5) S3l219!iJ e9 1m,!) gAl (il1urS) f'lItlCllI!8ll= .4l1l/Jl tQ/ld ir t.1lam 2.7 (10 31 3.9114.41 4.7~7.91 6.8 ~ 1) Mm'~ I]m'Y At.~ !oed iIih 1 ~ 5- i.T.&) :to 11.4, 3S 13.3l a.o 19. 5.7 I. AI i 1611I gplI ~ o.g~ 1.8 In 2.4 (9.~ U 9,91 M 13~ 4.0 1il.l U le:1 At 14 jqj 9Ph 0.& . 1.1 4.2) U(7 1.8 (6.1 2.1 i8.0) !3 (8.71 3.! 12.1) CooIanI capacI~ gal (liters) U (11.0) 4.0 115. II 70S (28.4) 9.2 (S4.8) IO.a (39.0) 10.3 Pll.Oj llJ.9 (41.2j on capaoaV filii (iIlarllJ 1.4S(Ul S.4(IUl 4.4(1&.2) a.5IWl 4.5 (17.Qj 4J (17oCl 8.3 (23.Bl l!Vll/lWJ x 9 IQ'J l.5OAh x 2 ~~.. 24\1 ,~em. I) , . 4 ~:- !~ 'AX> () - - ."~:~ f~ -, 216 12TH AVEN11E S'E 'ElBOW LAKE, MN 56P;':1: TELEPHONE: 800-367-6792 FAX: 218-6'85-5;Z72 www.mrwCl.com '.;;::~~~L -;.. . . ~~ .'. .;.,..~ . ~: ..:...........~~...,'...'....,.'~.~;....:,".~.:...'.;~.,...' - ';Ij. -... - . _ , ..:"f;:~;~'i;.:.;\:-:.. .~. ....- ~ ~. ~ ..: .::.~....i . ~.. :.,',- l' ! f 1 ..;../ ... ',""Y." ~ ~~~:r.'~ . . ....;...- , ~ --: j"".tI:; ., :-: :..' . - '. . ':.r'dc: A. '"D, .... . J r. '-', ~' fr,-' .~~-s.:~., . , , ; I t~._____ ..:}~#~ ?(rp ,.; j ~ , ;i ,. , . ~! I ~: ~ ", i --, :~ J.,~'~ o{~~ 4'-~?~::"i~~? :. .~~~~'f:i<l~~~:'i.~{;~<... "'"1 ,'.~ -, . ~. .' ~.~t, .~~ " .,.~'<:'; A~~.~~~' :~\-; ,,' .>~ .,;ij.~~#~: ~.;\. ..'~!l -, " -' ;'.c....;. ';~>I !>t~ '.~ .. 'c{4~{ ". ~;:~.~t -.-'. ":~-~ .;.~.~ .;I'/~:'; <';~" :,,'. '!,.' ,,~~ :~..:.\<.~ Me,; ~ :~ .,. ::,. "i :i: j _,_, 1-:_',~" .;- \_':;'" . :<~e:mO'jj TO: Honorable Mayor and Council Member FROM: Teresa Bender, CityClerkl\~' SUBJECT: Hunters Crossing 2nd Addition Developers Agreement DATE: August 21, 2003 Mr. Hoeft was directed to modify language regarding the issuance of Occupancy Permits for Model Homes per Mr. Carlson's request at the previous meeting. Mr. Hoeft has been. out of the office and will be back in the office on August 25, 2003. As soon as Mr. Hoeft's schedule allows, I will forward to you a revised developers agreement. j. DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT HUNTERS CROSSING 2ND ADDITION CENTERVILLE, MINNESOTA TIllS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this day of .2003, by and between the City of Centerville, a municipal corporation organized under the laws of the State of Minnesota (the "City"), and Richard S. Carlson Development a Minnesota Limited LiabIlity Company (the "Developer"). RECITALS: WHEREAS, the Developer has received approval from the City Council for a preliminary plat of land within the corporate limits of the City, which plat is known as Hunters Crossing 2nd Addition hereinafter called "Subdivision"; and WHEREAS, the Developer has requested the City to construct all surface streets, sidewalks, curb and gutter, recreational trails, storm sewer, drainage facilities, water main and sanitary sewer facilities, hereinafter referred to as "Street and Utility Improvements"; and WHEREAS, the Developer and the City desire to establish herein the financial responsibility for the Street and Utility Improvements; and WHEREAS, the Developer is to be responsible for the installation and financing of certain private improvements within the plat, hereinafter referred to as "Private Improvements". NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises of the parties made herein, it is agreed by and between the parties as follows: A. REPRESENTATIONS OF DEVELOPER. AB inducement to the City's approval and authorization to proceed with construction and entering into this Agreement, the Developer represents and warrants to the City: 1. That the Developer is the fee owner of the property and has authority to enter into this Agreement. 2. That the subdivision complies with all City, County, State and Federal laws and regulations, including but not limited to City subdivision ordinances and zoning ordinances. 3. The subdivision complies with all wetland protection legislation. - .,. B. PRIVATE IMPROVEMENTS. The Developer will construct and install at Developer's expense the general improvement construction according to Ordinance #8 and other improvements specific to the development herein set forth: l. Cost of Private Improvements, description: a. Street name signs (installed by the City) approximately ~ @ $250 each $1,000.00 b. Traffic signs, stop signs, etc. (installed by the City) approximately -1.. @ $250 $500.00 c. Utility markers approximately -1... @ $100 each $200.00 d. Street sweeping --1Q... @ $250.00 each $2,500.00 e. Lot access gravel/silt fence ...JQ. @ $500 each/lot $18,000.00 f. Flushing of storm sewers, once per year until all lots are built upon --..L @ $500.00 each $1,000.00 g. Street lights approximately ~ @ $2,000 $8,000.00 h. Shade trees (balled and burlapped) 2 per lot at $200.00 each @ ~(4 for Comer Lot) $17,200.00 1. Final Grade/Sod, ~ lots @ $2,OOO/lQt $72,000.00 J. Snowplow service of streets ~@ $100/plowing $2,000.00 k. City administration for review and compliance of above - ~ hours @ $50 / hour $1,000.00 Total Estimated Cost $123,400.00 Developer Retainage (150%) $185,100.00 All of the above items under Section B with the exception of the trees and sod on unbuilt lots shall be completed' and/or provided to the City by September 30. 2004. 2 2. Also included as items associated with the Private Improvements, the Developer shall undertake or arrange to accomplish the following: a. Site Development Issues i. Coordinate with the utility companies to provide for gas main, telephone lines, cable television lines, and power lines to service the properties developed on the final plat according to the City's joint trench policy. ii. Provide seeding and vegetation maintenance and erosion control over denuded or graded areas and mitigation area, at the City's direction. iii. Establish lot comer monumentation within 180 days after filing the final plat. IV. Provide such street maintenance and control of builder's actions to maintain roadways clear of mud, soil, and debris to provide safe driving surfaces. The Developer shall provide street sweeping within 24 hours of the City's request for such services. v. Provide for landscaping in accordance with the City ordinances and Developer's approved landscape plan. The Developer shall accomplish or cause to be accomplished these actions according to generally accepted trade standards. The Developer will cause to be furnished to the City a schedule of proposed operations at least five days prior to commencement of the construction activities. b. Site Grading, Street Construction and Building Permits. No certificate of occupancy shall be issued without installation of bituminous base course across the front lot line of that property. No building permit shall be issued for any lot without the finished grading in accordance with the approved grading plan. c. Erosion Control. The Developer shall control erosion insuring: I. The Developer shall submit an erosion control plan, detailing all erosion control measures to be implemented during construction. Said plan shall be approved by the City prior to the commencement of site grading or construction. 11. Erosion and siltation control measures shall be coordinated with the different stages of development. Appropriate control measures 3 as required by the City shall be installed prior to development when necessary to control erosion. 111. Land shall be developed in increments of workable size, as determined by the City Engineer, such that adequate erosion and siltation controls as directed by the engineer can be provided as construction progresses. The smallest practical area of land, as determined by the City Engineer, shall be exposed at anyone period of time. IV. Where the topsoil is removed, sufficient arable soils shall be set aside for respreading over the developed area. The topsoil shall be reStored to a depth of at least four (4) inches and shall be of a quality at least equal to the soil quality prior to development. The Developer shall also install four (4) inches of topsoil on all boulevards and seed or sod as approved by the City. The Developer shall make all necessary adjustments to water service curb stops to bring them flush with the topsoil (before occupancy). All disturbed areas shall be seeded. d. Inspection. All of the work shall be under and subject to the inspection and approval of the City, City Engineer, and where appropriate, any other governmental agency having jurisdiction. e. Faithful Performance of Construction Contracts and Letter of Credit. The Developer will fully and faithfully comply with all terms and conditions of any and all contracts entered into by the Developer for the installation and construction of all Private Improvements and hereby guarantees the workmanship and materials for a period of two years following the City's final acceptance of the Private Improvements. The Developer agrees to guaranty for a period of one year the tree plantings required as part of the Developer's Agreement. Each specific tree guaranty period shall begin with the planting of each specific tree. Concurrently with the execution hereof by the Developer, the Developer will furnish to, and at all times thereafter maintain with the City, a cash deposit, certified check, or an Irrevocable Letter of Credit, based on one hundred fifty percent (150%) of the total estimated cost of the Private Improvements as indicated in Paragraph B 1. The Irrevocable Letter of Credit shall be for the exclusive use and benefit of the City of Centerville and shall state thereon the same is issued to guaranty and assure performance by the Developer of all the terms and conditions of Paragraph B 1 of this Development Contract. Such Letter of Credit may be reduced upon completion and acceptance of the Private Improvements by the City to an amount deemed adequate by the City Engineer to cover the two year warranty period described herein. The City shall have the right during said warranty period to draw on the Letter of Credit for any warranty work that is necessary. The Irrevocable 4 Letter of Credit shall be renewed or replaced by not later than twenty (20) days prior to its expiration with a like letter. f.. Reduction of Escrow Guaranty. The Developer may request a reduction of the Letter of Credit or cash deposit based on prepayment or the value of the completed Private Improvements at the time of the requested reduction. The amount of reduction will be determined by the City and such recommendation will be submitted to the City Council for action. g. Approval of Contractors. Any contractor selected by the Developer to construct and install any Private Improvements must be determined in writing by the City Engineer to be acceptable. The City reserves the right to require satisfactory proof of successful experience and adequate financial status by any such contractor. C. STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS. In accordance with the policies and ordinances of the City, the "Street and Utility Improvements" include those improvements as described by the plans, specifications, and contract documents entitled Hunters Crossing 2nd Addition Street and Utility Improvements, as prepared by the City Engineer and as adopted and approved by the City Council. The Developer hereby requests that the City install and/or modify the necessary streets, sanitary sewer, water, municipal storm sewer to service the proposed development The City agrees to proceed pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Chapter 429, the Petition for Local Improvement signed by Developer dated June 15, 2003 signed June 15, 2003, and the Agreement of Assessment and Waiver of Irregularity and Appeal signed by Developer dated .2003, and to specially assess 100% of the cost of said improvements to the subject property, with the exception of those costs attributable to the oversizing of the watermain, which costs are as set forth in the Hunters Crossing 2nd Addition Street and Utility Improvements as prepared by the City Engineer. Said oversizing costs will be the responsibility of City. As provided by Minnesota~tatute 429, this waiver of rights of appeal is effective for the amount of $1,244,134.00 (excluding change orders during construction). Prior to the preparation of final plans and specifications for the construction of said improvements, the Developer shall provide to the City a cash escrow in the amount of $12,500.00 to provide for financing the cost of preparing the Development Contract and said final plans and specifications by the City Engineer. Furthermore, the Developer shall also provide a cash escrow to the City in an amount indicated in writing to provide for financing the cost of inspection, staking, and construction administration by the City Engineer. D. COVENANTS/RESTRICTIONS. Developer hereby agrees to place certain covenants against the subject property, restricting its development to single family home construction. Said covenants shall be approved by the City and recorded against the Property . 5 E. RECORDING AND RELEASE. The Developer agrees that the terms of this Development Contract shall be a covenant on any and all property included in the Subdivision. The Developer agrees that the City shall have the right to record a copy of this Development Contract with the Anoka County Recorder/Registrar to give notice to future purchasers and owners. F. REIMBURSEMENT OF COSTS. Except as limited by Minnesota Statute 462.3531, the Developer agrees to fully reimburse the City for all costs incurred by the City including, but not limited to, the actual costs of construction of said improvements, engineering fees, legal fees, inspection fees, interest costs, costs of acquisition of necessary easements, if any, and any other costs incurred by the City relating to this Development Contract and the installation and financing of the aforementioned improvements. G. OCCUP A nON OF PREMISES. The Developer further agrees that it will not cause to be occupied any premises upon the plat or any property within the plat until the completion of the gas, electric, telephone, cable television, water, and sewer . improvements required by this Development Contract have been installed, unless the City has agreed in writing to waive this requirement as to a specific premises. Furthermore, Developer shall be granted no certificates of occupancy for homes within the plat prior to substantial completion of all Private and Street and Utility Improvements described in this Contract, and as detailed in paragraph B.2(b). Building Permits shall be issued only within the constraints as set forth previously herein. H. OWNERSHIP OF IMPROVEMENTS. Upon completion of the work and construction required by this Contract and acceptance by the City, the improvements lying within the public easements shall become City property without further notice or action. I. INDEMNIFICA nON AND HOLD HARMLESS. The Developer shall hold the City and its officers and employees harmless from claims made by itself and third parties for damages sustained or costs incurred resulting fro~ subdivision plat approval and development. The Developer shall indemnify the City and its officers and employees for all costs, damages, or expenses which the City may payor incur in consequence of such claims, including reasonable attorneys fees. Provided that nothing herein shall require Developer to indemnify the City, its officers or employees from any violation of law or from the consequences of their own negligence. J. PROHIBITIONS AGAINST ASSIGNMENT OF AGREEMENT. Developer represents and agrees that prior to the completion of the Developer improvements as certified by the City: 1. Except by way of security for, and only for the purpose of obtaining financing necessary to enable the Developer to perform its obligations with respect to the construction of the improvements under this Agreement and any other purpose authorized by this Agreement, the Developer (except as so authorized) will not make or create, or suffer to be made or created, any total or partial sale, 6 assignment, conveyance, or transfer in any other mode or form, with respect to this Agreement or any interest therein, or any contract or agreement to do any of the same, without the prior written approval of the City. 2. In the absence of specific written agreement by the City to the contrary, no such transfer or approval by the City shall be deemed to relieve Developer from any of its obligations. In the event that the City approves a substitute Developer and the property is transferred to said substitute, the City agrees to relieve the Developer of liability from performance as described in this Contract. Said substitute shall assume all responsibilities and rights of the Developer under this Contract. Nothing in paragraphs 1 and 2 of this paragraph J shall be construed to limit or restrict Developer's right of ability to sell lots to builders. K. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS. 1. Reimbursement of Costs for Defense. The Developer agrees to reimburse the City for all costs incurred by the City in defense of enforcement of this Contract, or any portion thereof, including court costs and reasonable engineering and attorney's fees. 2. Validity. If any portion, section, subsection, sentence, clause, paragraph, or phrase in this Contract is for any reason held to be invalid by a court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect or void any of the other provisions of the Development Contract. 3. Waiver. The action or inaction of the City shall not constitute a waiver or amendment to the provisions of this Agreement. To be binding, amendments or waivers shall be in writing, signed by the parties, and approved by written resolution of the City Council. The City's failure to promptly take legal action to enforce this Agreement shall not be a waiver or release. 4. Binding Effect. The terms and provisions hereof shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the heirs, representatives, successors, and assigns of the parties hereto and shall be binding upon all future owners of all or any part of the Subdivision and shall be deemed covenants running with the land. 5. Netice. Whenever in this Contract it shall be required or permitted that notice or demand be given or served by either party to this Contract to or on the other party, such notice or demand shall be delivered personally or mailed by United States mail to the addresses set forth below by certified mail (return receipt requested). Such notice or demand shall be deemed timely given when delivered personally or when deposited in the mail in accordance with the above. The addresses of the parties hereto are as set forth below until changed by notice given as per above: 7 Developer: Richard S. Carlson Development, LLC 7671 Central Avenue Fridlev. MN 55432 City: City of Centerville Attn: City Administrator 1880 Main Street Centerville, MN 55038 6. Final Plat Approval. Final plat approval shall be conditioned upon execution and delivery of this Contract and of all required documentation, fees, and securities as set forth herein. 7. Incorporation by Reference. All approved plans, special provisions, proposals, specifications, and contracts for the improvements furnished and let pursuant to this Contract shall be and hereby are made a part of this Contract by reference as :fully as if set out herein in :full. 8. Violation of Agreement. In the event that Developer violates any of the covenants and agreements contained in this Development Contract and to be performed by the Developer, the City, at its option, in addition to the rights and remedies as set forth hereunder may refuse to issue building permits to any property within the plat until such time as such default has been corrected to the satisfaction of the City. 9. Park Dedication. The parties mutually recognize and agree that park dedication requirements as provided in the City Code shall" be satisfied by cash payment of $108.000.00 calculated at $3.000.00 per lot multiplied by 36 lots. 10. Storm Water Fees. The storm water fee shall be paid by the Developer prior to approval of the final plat. This fee is $15.893.00. based on a charge of$.01546 per square foot of23.6 acres of platted area. 11. Liability Insurance Requirement. The Developer shall provide to the City, at the Developer's expense, general public liability and property damage insurance including vehicle coverage protecting the City and the Developer from all claims for personal injury, including death, and all claims for construction of or damage to property, arising out of or in connection with any operations under these contract documents, whether such operations be by the Developer, its contractor, or by any subcontractor, or anyone directly or indirectly employed by the contractor or by a subcontractor under it. Insurance shall be written with a limit of liability of not less than $600,000 for all damages arising out of bodily injury including death, at any time resulting therefrom, sustained by anyone person in anyone accident; and a limit of liability of not less than $1,000,000 for any such 8 damage sustained by two or more persons in anyone accident. Insurance shall be written with a limit of liability of not less than $300,000 for all property damage sustained by one person in anyone accident, and a limit of liability of not less than $700,000 forany such damage sustained by two or more persons in anyone accident. The insurance policies shall accompany the contract for its execution by the Developer and the City of Centerville. The above insurance policies shall remain in full force and effect at all times during the process of constructing all improvements set forth herein, and until six (6) months after city acceptance of the Private Improvements and completion of the Street and Utility Improvements. The City, City Engineer, and Developer's engineer shall be an additional named insured in any such policy or policies. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, City and Developer have signed this Development Agreement the day and year first written above. CITY: DEVELOPER: CITY OF CENTERVILLE By: Mayor By: Its: ATTEST: By: City Clerk STATE OF MINNESOTA) ) ss COUNTY OF ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this _ day of , 20-, by the Mayor of the City of Centerville, a municipal corporation under the laws of the State of Minnesota, on behalf of the City. Notary Public 9 STATE OF MINNESOTA) ) ss COUNTY OF ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this _ day of . 20-, by the City Clerk of the City of Centerville, a municipal corporation under the laws of the State of Minnesota, on behalf of the City. Notary Public STATE OF MINNESOTA) ) ss COUNTY OF ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this _ day of 20-, by the of a Minnesota Notary Public TIllS INSTRUMENT WAS DRAFTED BY: BARNA, GUZY AND STEFFEN, LTD. 400 Northtown Financial Plaza 200 Coon Rapids Boulevard Coon Rapids, MN 55433 (763) 780-8500 (JDH) 200265_1 10 EXHIBIT B CASH FEES 1. Stormwater Fee 2. Final Plat Filing 3. Administration Fees $100.00ILot @ 36 Lots 4. Park Dedications Fees $3,000.00ILot @ 36 Lots SECURITIES 1. Street and Utility Improvements (Disbursement Agreement) 2. Private Improvements (paragraph AI) TOTAL 11 $15,893.00 $0 $3,600.00 $108.000.00 $127,493.00 $1,282,925.00 $185.100.00 $1,595,518.00 TO: Honorable Mayor and Council Members FROM: Teresa Bender, City Clerk SUBJECT: Recent Competitive Rubbish Hauler Mailings DATE: August 22, 2003 Recently, several residents have received mailings for rubbish service through BFI at rates that are significantly lower than our current contract. In February or March, ACE Solid Waste also canvassed the Centerville area with a promotional mailing for services at rates that were significantly lower than our current contact On both occasions, telephone calls were initiated to the respective waste haulers who either apologized or their mailings state that it is an offer only available to Lino Lakes residents. It is believed that they mailings could have been prevented if the hauler would have modified their mailing area more selectively. I have attached the City's Ordinance #1, the City's hauler contract and proposed language modification for Ordinance #1 for your review and directive. ..Effective:.2/27/59 City ofCenterville Ord. #1 STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF ANOKA CITY OF CENTERVILLE ORDINANCE #1 AN ORDINANCE DEFINING GARBAGE, RUBBISH AND WASTE MATTER AND PROVIDING FOR AND REGULATING THE KEEPING, GATHERING, RECEIVING, DISPOSING AND DESTROYING THEREOF; MAKING IT UNLAWFUL TO SPILL GARBAGE, RUBBISH OR WATER MATTER OF ANY KIND UPON THE PUBLIC WAYS OF THE CITY OF CENTERVILLE: PROVIDING THE MUNICIPAL COLLECTION OF GARBAGE BY CONTRACT, PROVIDING FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT OF FEES TO BE CHARGED FOR GARBAGE COLLECTIONS; PROVIDING A PENALTY FOR VIOLATION OF THE PROVISIONS OF TmS ORDINANCE; AND REPEALING INCONSISTENT ORDINANCES. The City Council of the City of Centerville, Anoka County, Minnesota does ordain: SECTION 1. DEFINITIONS. A. Garbage. Applies to both residences and businesses and commercial enterprises, and shall consist of organic refuse resulting from the preparation of food and decayed and spoiled food from any source, dead animals of not more than 10 pounds in weight each, and glass and tin cans in which foods are customarily purchased. B. Rubbish. Consists of wood, leaves, chips.2. shavings, printed matter, paper, paste board, grass, rags, straw.2. discarded wearing apparel, and all other combustible matter not included in this ordinance under the term garbage. C. Waste Matter. Consists of natural soil, earth, sand, clay, gravel, loam, brick, plaster, ashes, and all non-combustible matter. D. Collection Service. A private operation engaged in collection and _transportation of refuse, yard waste and recyclables. E. Independent Contractor. A person authorized by the Contractor to perform refuse collection services within the City. F. Single Stream Recycling. The commingled collection of all recyclables in a single 32, 64, or 96 gallon, wheeled cart. Page 1 of5 .Effective: ,2127/59 City ofCenterville Ord #1 G. Recyclables. Items such as newspaper, plastics with a neck, catalogs, magazines, phone books, junk mail, corrugated cardboard, 4c's boxboard, ledger paper, bi-metal cans, aluminum, and glass. H. Toxic and Hazardous Wastes. Waste materials including, but not limited to, poisons, pesticides, herbicides, acids, caustics, pathological wastes, radioactive materials, flammable or explosive materials, and similar harmful chemicals and wastes that require special handling and must be disposed of in a manner to conserve the environment and protect public health and safety. 1. White Goods. Household appliances including items such as refrigerators, freezers, stoves, dishwashers, washers and dryers, water heaters, microwave ovens, furnaces, air conditioners, dehumidifiers, and trash compactors. J. Yard Waste. Compostible organic plant material that consist of grass clippings, leaves, and soft garden material, including brush and limbs less than four inches in diameter and four feet in length provided they are bundled with twine or other organic material. SECTION 2. CARE OF GARBAGE. It shall be the duty of every tenant, lessee, or occupant of every private dwelling house, or commercial enterprise, and the owner of every furnished flat or apartment, house, or business building, to provide, without expense to the City of Centerville, and at all times to keep upon the lot upon which such building is located, suitable and sufficient cans or receptacles with suitable handles and have a tight fitting cover for receiving and holding without leakage or escape of odors, all the garbage which would ordinarily accumulate on said premises in one week's time. Such cans shall have a minimum capacity of 10 gallons and a maximum capacity of 90 gallons. Owners of apartment buildings with more than two (2) units shall have a bin on said premises, the size/capacity to be determined by the garbage collection independent contractor. All such cans, receptacles, and bins shall be placed so as to be located not more than 35 feet from the point to which the garbage pickup truck may be driven and shall not be located so as to be a public nuisance or in any way offensive. All garbage shall be wrapped dry and wrapped in paper or placed in a paper bag or cardboard box before it is placed in io the garbage can or receptacle. No rubbish or waste matter shall be placed in said garbage cans or receptacle. No garbage can or receptacle shall be placed in any public place. It shall be unlawful to keep, place or deposit garbage on any private grounds or premises except in cans or receptacles as designated by this ordinance. The Building Inspector shall be the exclusive judge of the efficiency of such garbage cans, receptacles and located areas. Page 2 of5 . Effective: ..2127/59 City ofCenterville Ord. #1 It shall be unlawful to keep, place or deposit garbage, waste matter, or ru.bbish on the public ways of the City of Centerville. Garbage in bags shall not be placed outdoors for pick-up except on the date of pickup. Garbage shall not be placed in the right-of-way outdoors for pick-up no earlier than 12 hours prior to pick up. SECTION 3. Hours of operation are between 7:00 a.m. and 8:00 p.m. In the event of an emergency, the City reserves the right to amend the hours of operation. SECTION 4. This City Council may license an independent contractor to collect garbage in the City of Centerville upon payment of a license fee as listed in the current fee schedule. The City Council may contract with said licensee for the collection of garbage in the City of Centerville on such terms and for such periods as the Council may from time to time determine. It shall be unlawful for any other person or persons to move or carry away any garbage, except from his own premises, except by special permission of the City Council. . The independent contractor is responsible for the safe, legal, and environmentally sound disposal of refuse, garbage, white goods, and any other items and materials collected under the contract. The independent contractor will dispose of refuse and garbage collected in Centerville at the Anoka County Disposal Facility. The independent contractor must maintain Anoka County receipts of delivery and shall provide the City with copies of such receipts upon request. Estimated City tonnages must be reported by the independent contractor to the City monthly. The independent contractor is responsible for the safe, legal, and environmentally sound conveyance of all yard waste collected under the contract. The independent contractor will convey the yard waste to a compost site as approved by the City. The independent contractor may not mix other types of refuse or inorganic materials with the yard waste or take any action so as to make the yard waste material unacceptable to the operators of the compost site. The independent contractor is responsible for the safe, legal, and environmentally sound collection and conveyance of recyclables. The independent contractor must convey the recyclables to a market, which assures these materials will not be landfilled. The independent contractor may not mix other types of refuse or inorganic materials with the recyclables or take any action to make the recyclable material unacceptable to the operators of the recycling center. Page 3 of5 .Effective: )/27/59 City ofCenterville Ord. #1 Only. pickups authorized by the contract may be made. The independent contractor is not entitled to payment for any pickups not authorized by the contract. SECTION 5. The independent contractor shall furnish his own equipment and labor for the collection of garbage. The independent contractor shall collect garbage within the City of Centerville and no other person shall make a business of or collect any place within the City of Centerville. The garbage so collected by such independent contractor shall be disposed of by said contractor in a sanitary manner. The independent contractor shall furnish a performance bond in the amount of $1,000, conditioned upon the satisfactory performance of his contract. The independent contractor shall at all times maintain insurance on all of his equipment, against liability imposed by law, for personal injury in the amount of at least $100,000 for injury to anyone (1) person and $300,000 for personal injuries arising out of anyone (1) accident and $50,000 for property damage. A certificate of said insurance shall be filed with the City Clerk. SECTION 6. The independent contractor shall charge a fee to each place or person served, on the basis of services rendered. The amount of said fee shall be determined by the Council. The independent contractor may collect the fee directly, if authorized by the Council, and in such case, he shall keep accurate records of all his fee collections and he shall report his fee collections monthly to the Clerk of the City of Centerville. The statements for such fees shall be sent to the place or person served at such intervals as the Council shall determine. The Council may provide for a cash discount on such bills or for a discount for prepayment of an account. The contract with the independent contractor shall be based upon unit price. SECTION 7. It shall be lawful in case any person shall default in the payment of the garbage collection fees for the City Council to collect its fee therefore from said person or the owner of the real property from which the garbage was collected, by civil action or by assessing the same against the real estate. SECTION 8. All licenses granted for the collection of garbage prior to the adoption of this ordinance shall terminate on the effective date of this ordinance. Page 4 of5 .. .Effective: )./27/59 City ofCenterville Ord. #1 SECTION 9. Any persons violating any provision of this ordinance shall upon conviction thereof by subject to a misdemeanor or imprisonment for not exceeding 90 days. SECTION 10. All ordinance or provisions thereof inconsistent with the provisions of the ordinance are hereby repealed. SECTION 11. This ordinance shall become effective upon its publication. Adopted by the Village Council this 27tb. day of February, 195~. (Signature on File) Mayor, Francis V. Burque ATTEST: (Signature on File) Clerk, Dan J. Tourville Published in the Anoka Herald on March 12, 1959. Amended: March 13, 1974 Published in the Blaine-Spring Lake Park Life on March 29, 1974 Amended: December 14, 1988 Published in the Quad Community Press on January 3, 1989 Amended: May 28, 2003 Published in the Quad Community Press on June 10, 2003 Page 5 of5 J' , , REFUSE & RECYCLING SERVICE CONTRACT TIllS CONTRACT made and entered into on February 1st, 2003, by and between the City of Centerville, Minnesota, a municipal corporation in the County of Anoka (City), and Waste Management of Minnesota, Inc., a Minnesota corporation (Contractor). RECIT ALS: WHEREAS, the City requires the collection and disposal of garbage and rubbish, yard waste, and recyclables from residences in the City; and Whereas, the Contractor is a licensed hauler in the City engaged in the business of collection and disposing of garbage and rubbish, yard waste, and recyclables; and Whereas, the City desires to obtain the services of the Contractor and the Contractor desires to provide services to the City. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual undertakings of the parties, it is agreed: I. GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF SERVICES. The Contractor will supply the labor, materials, and equipment necessary to make a complete collection of garbage, refuse, and yard waste and recyclables from all residences in the City during the term of this Contract. Such collections will include all residential dwelling units, as defined in Section III K, and be accomplished by use of individual containers. The Contractor will provide the personnel, equipment, and facilities necessary to fulfill the terms and conditions of this Contract. The Contractor will provide the services in compliance with all applicable laws and charge for the services on a volume-based schedule in accordance with Attachment A. II. TERM OF CONTRACT. This Contract is effective for the seven-year period beginning February 1, 2003, and expiring December 31, 2009, with an option to renew not exceeding five one-year periods. ill. DEFINITIONS. For purposes of this Contract, the terms defined in this Section have the meanings given them: A. Additional Collection Service. Refuse in excess of the designated volume-base per residential dwelling unit. -1- l B. Bulky items. Large household items including carpeting and padding (less than three feet and under 50 lbs), mattresses, chairs, couches, tables, and other such items offurniture that are too large for one person to pick up. C. CityofCenterville Solid Waste Sticker. A sticker purchased directly from the City to be affixed to any Additional Collection Service item. The number of stickers required per item is to be established by the City and enforced by the Contractor. D. Collection Service. A private operation engaged in collection and transportation of refuse, yard waste and recyclables. E. Garbage. Organic waste, including discarded material resulting from the handling, processing, storage, preparation, serving, and consumption of food. F. Independent Contractor. A person authorized by the Contractor to perform refuse collection services within the City. G. Multi-Family Dwelline: Unit. A Multi-Family Dwelling Unit is any dwelling unit designed for multiple housekeeping units that does not qualify for regular garbage service under this Contract. H. Single Stream Recycling. The commingled collection of all recyclables in a single 35,64, or 96 gallon wheeled cart. I. Recyclables. Items such as newspaper, plastics with a neck, catalogs, magazines, phone books, junk mail, corrugated cardboard, 4C's boxboard, ledger paper, bi-metal cans, aluminum, and glass. J. Refuse. Putrescible and nonputrescible solid waste from residences including garbage and rubbish, and specifically excluding yard waste, recyclables, and toxic and hazardous wastes. Refuse further excludes industrial, commercial, agricultural, and construction garbage or rubbish and wastes. K. Residential Dwelling Unit. A single family dwelling unit and each unit of a duplex, triplex, fourplex, and townhome: the term does not include apartment buildings. L. Rubbish. Solid waste, including ashes consisting of both combustible and noncombustible wastes, such as wood, bedding, crockery, and other non-reusable waste: the term also includes non-recyclable types of glass, paper, cardboard, and metal cans M. Townhome. Structures containing two or more units that are contiguous to each other governed by a homeowner's or renter's association. -2- ~. N. Toxic and Hazardous Wastes. Waste materials including, but not limited to, poisons, pesticides, herbicides, acids, caustics, pathological wastes, radioactive materials, flammable or explosive materials, and similar harmful chemicals and wastes that require special handling and must be disposed of in a manner to conserve the environment and protect public health and safety. o. White Goods. Household appliances including items such as refrigerators, freezers, stoves, dishwashers, washers and dryers, water heaters, microwave ovens, furnaces, air conditioners, dehumidifiers, and trash compactors. P. Yard Waste. Compostible organic plant material that consists of grass clippings, leaves, and soft garden material, including brush and limbs less than four inches in diameter and four feet in length provided they are bundled with twine or other organic material. IV. SCOPE OF CONTRACT. A. Collection Service Provided bv Contractor. 1. Garbage and Refuse Collection. a. Description. Refuse collection serVice includes the collection of garbage and refuse from residential dwelling units in the City. Included in the cost of this service is the annual collection of one Christmas tree (not wrapped in a plastic bag and free of ornaments and tinsel) from every residential dwelling unit. Collection costs are described in Attachment A. b. Exclusions. Refuse collection service does not include the collection of: i) toxic and hazardous waste including items such as batteries, tires, construction material, motor oils, and paint in liquid form; ii) limbs, brush and similar items of vegetation; ill) animal waste and solid waste materials resulting from industrial, commercial, and agricultural operations; iv) - Earthen fill, boul~ers, rock, and other materials normally handled in construction operations, solids or dissolved materials in domestic sewage or other significant pollutants in waste resources, such as silt, dissolved or suspended solids in industrial waste water effluent, dissolved materials in irrigation return flows or other common water pollutants. -3- .. c. Containers. The Contractor must provide containers for each residential dwelling unit. The containers are owned by Waste Management and maintained by Waste Management. Three sizes of containers have been approved for use: i) a container of35 gallons; ii) a container of 64 gallons; ill) a container of 96 gallons. d. Location. A residential dwelling unit must have its container at the curb adjacent to the unit on or before 6:00 a.m. on the designated day of collection. e. Frequencv. A residential dwelling unit must have its refuse collected a minimum of once per week. f. Additional Collection Service. Refuse and garbage in excess of the provided containers will be pi<?ked up by the Contractor when properly affixed with a City Solid Waste Sticker. Collection service for white goods must be by prior arrangement with the Contractor for collection and will be billed in accordance with Attachment B. g. Reporting. Tonnages of refuse or garbage collected must be reported by Contractor to the City on a monthly basis. h. Free Pick-Up at City-Owned Prot>erties. Contractor will provide service as necessary for the collection and disposal of refuse, garbage and recyclables from City-owned properties and parks listed in Attachment E at no cost to the City. 1. Disposal. The Contractor is responsible for the safe, legal, and environmentally sound disposal of refuse, garbage, white goods, and any other items and materials collected under this Contract. The Contractor will dispose of refuse and garbage collected in Centerville at the Anoka County Disposal facility. The Contractor must maintain Anoka County receipts of delivery and shall provide the City with copies. of such receipts upon request. Estimated City tonnages must be reported by the Contractor to the City monthly. J. Notification. If a resident of the City places an item out for pickup and the item is not taken by the Contractor, the Contractor must provide immediate written notification to the resident of reason for refusal to pick up the item. Notification must be left on the item in question. k. Exceptions for Handicapped or Disabled. The Contractor must make reasonable exceptions as to the manner of pickup for handicapped or disabled residents. -4- 2. Yard Waste Collection. a. Description. Yard waste collection service includes the collection of yard waste from residential dwelling units in the City. Cost for this service is described in Attachment A. b. Location. A residential dwelling unit must have its yard waste segregated from other refuse in a plastic bag or a permanent can clearly identified as ''Yard Waste" located at the boulevard adjoining the curb or other designated pick-up location on or before 6:00 a.m. on the designated day of collection. c. Frequency. Yard Waste Collection Service will be provided from April 15th through November 15thth each year. A residential dwelling unit must have its yard waste collected a minimum of once per week on the same day as refuse collection service. d. Reporting. Tonnages or yards of yard waste collected must be reported by the Contractor to the City on a monthly basis. e. Conveyance of Yard Waste. The Contractor is responsible for the safe, legal, and environmentally sound conveyance of all yard waste collected under this Contract. The Contractor will convey the yard waste to a compost site as approved by the City. The Contractor may not mix other types of refuse or inorganic materials with the yard waste or take any action so as to make the yard waste material unacceptable to the operators of the compost site. f. Notification. If a resident places yard waste out for pickup and the material is not taken by the Contractor, the Contractor will provide immediate written notification to the resident of reason for refusal to pick up the item. Notification must be left on the item in question. The Contractor must make reasonable exceptions as to the manner of pickup for handicapped and elderly residents. g. Education. The Contractor will assist the City in the education of residents on how to properly prepare yard waste. Contractor will work with City staff on a quarterly basis to prepare written materials for residents. 3. Single Stream Recycling Collection a. Description. Recyclable collection service includes the collection ofrecyclables, from residential dwelling units. Cost for this service is described in Attachment A. b. Containers. Residential dwelling units will be supplied recycling containers by the Contractor of 35, 64, or 96-gallon size as requested by owner or renter. The containers are to be owned by the City and maintained by the Contractor. -5- c. Single Sort SyStem. Residents will be instructed to commingle all recyc1ables into one container. d. Location. Residential dwelling units must have their recyclables in approved containers provided. by Waste Management located. at the boulevard adjoining the curb or other designated pick-up location. e. Frequency. Each residential dwelling unit will have its recyclables collected. by Contractor every other week on the same day as refuse collection service. f. R~orting. Tonnages of recyclables collected must be reported by the Contractor to the City on a monthly basis. These tonnages must be reported by individual materials collected and the place where the recyclables are delivered must be disclosed. If the tonnages are estimates, the method of estimation must also be disclosed and Contractor will do everything possible to ensure the accuracy of estimates. g. Conveyance of Recvclables. The Contractor is responsible for the safe, legal, and environmentally sound collection and conveyance of recyc1ables. The Contractor must convey the recyclables to a market, which assures these materials will not be landfilled. The Contractor may not mix other types of refuse or inorganic materials with the recyclables or take any action to make the recyclable material unacceptable to the operators of the recycling center. h. Material Preparation. The Contractor must promptly inform owners and occupants of residential dwelling units of how to properly prepare recyc1ables for collection. If the Contractor fails to pick up a recyclable ata residential dwelling unit because it was improperly prepared, it is the Contractor's responsibility to immediately inform in writing the residential dwelling unit how to properly prepare the recyclables to make the recyclables acceptable for pick up. The City must approve any change in material preparation requirements and the Contractor shall bear full responsibility for notifying residents of changes. B. Service Schedule 1. Hours. The Contractor will perform collection services between the hours of 6:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m., on Monday through Friday, except when an emergency exists, at which time the Contractor must notify the City of such emergency. The Contractor may perform collection services on Saturday when a holiday falls on a weekday. 2. Holidays. The Contractor will observe the following legal holidayS on which their offices and operations will be closed: New Year's Day, Memorial Day, Independence Day, Labor Day, Thanksgiving Day, and Christmas Day. When holidays fall on a weekday, the -6- collection for each day of that week after the holiday will be made one working day later. 3. Authorized Pickups. Only pickups authorized by this Contract may be made. The Contractor is not entitled to payment for any pickups not authorized by this Contract. 4. Street Improvements. The City may conduct street improvement proj ects that may prevent the Contractor from traveling its accustomed route or routes for collection. The Contractor must contact the City Engineer prior to each construction season to determine areas of conflict and possible alternate routes or solutions. 5. Administration. Contractor must maintain an office equipped with electronic communication equipment and staffed with sufficient personnel to handle complaints, orders for special service, or to receive instructions. a. The office must be staffed from 8:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday (except holidays). b. The Contractor will maintain a written log of all complaints, the date thereof and the action taken pursuant thereto or the reason for non-action. Complaints must be responded to within 24 hours of their receipt. The log of complaints must be made available for inspection by an authorized City representative upon request. C. Performance Standards. The Contractor will supply the labor, material, and equipment necessary for the performance of this Contract. 1. Equipment a. Vehicle Protection. Trucks or motor vehicles used by the Contractor must be water-tight so as not to allow the leakage of liquids or refuse while hauling and covered to prevent the scattering of contents upon the public streets or private properties in the City. If garbage or refuse is dropped or spilled in collection or transporting, it must be immediately cleaned up. A broom and shovel must be carried on each vehicle at all times for this purpose. b. Cleaning. Vehicles must be kept in a clean and sanitary condition. c. PaiBting. The vehicle packer body must be painted and numbered and have the Contractor's name and telephone number painted in letters of a contrasting color, at least three inches high on each side of the vehicle and the number painted or a decal placed on the rear of the vehicle. d. Maintenance. Vehicles must be maintained in good working order and equipped to meet all federal, state, and municipal regulations concerning vehicles used on public roads. -7- e. Vehicle Inspection. Vehicles must be inspected by the City at least once each year. However, if a vehicle has been inspected and approved by another city or governmental agency within the previous 12 months prior to the City inspection, no additional inspection is required. f. Description of Vehicles. The Contractor must furnish the City with a written description of vehicles and equipment to be used within the City and advise the City in writing of any withdrawal of a part of such equipment or of any change therein within one week of the time of making such change. e. Safety Equipment. A vehicle must have a flashing light warning system, fire extinguisher (C02 type), proper backup alarms as approved by the City, and otherwise shall comply with all State and Federal inspections and safety requirements. 2. Personnel Requirements. a. Responsibility. i) There is no limitation on the size of the Contractor's collection crew. ii) A collection crew must comply with the Ordinances of the City and all of those rules, regulations, and conditions for refuse collection as established by the City. b. Driver. i) The Contractor's personnel, including independent contractors, must comply with applicable laws including driving and traffic laws, relating to its performance of services under this ,Contract. Contractor's personnel must comply with all Federal regulations in Code ofFedera1 Regulations (CFR) at 49 CPR, Part 382 as it pertains to drug and alcohol testing. Upon request, Contractor must supply City with any results of its drug and alcohol-testing program. ii) A driver must have a valid Minnesota License with proper classification. c. Collector. i) The driver and collector must exhibit a courteous attitude toward the general public. ii) The driver and collector must be of sound character, competent, and sober -8- throughout the entire workday. ill) The driver and collector must be able to remember the order of collection and location of all containers on the assigned routes. iv) The driver and collector must maintain a presentable appearance. v) The collector on each crew must be physically able to perform the duties and be at least 18 years of age. vi) The collector must perform the work in a neat and quiet manner and clean up refuse, yard waste or recyclables spilled in collection. d. Damage to containers or other property to be avoided. i). Consumption of beverages containing alcohol or the use of controlled substances is forbidden during or before work hours of any collection day. ii). Before the start of each collection day, the collection crew must check to see that the collection vehicle is equipped with at least one broom and shovel for use in cleaning up refuse, yard waste, or recyclables spilled during collection or hauling. 3. Supervision. The City Administrator will appoint a City representative to insure that the provisions of this Contract are being carried out. Contractor agrees to fully cooperate with the representative to achieve Contract compliance. 4. Liquidated Damages. The Contractor agrees that the City may fine the Contractor in the amounts specified below as liquidated damages for failure of the Contractor to fulfill its obligations. The City will notify the Contractor in writing documenting the nature of the violation, the history of the account, if any, and the reason for the fine. The Contractor may address and remedy the failure at which point the City will determine if a fine is still appropriate, in its sole determination. The Contractor must notify the City in writing of its remedial action. a. Failure to clean up solid waste spilled by Contractor within six (6) hours of oral or written notification - $50.00 each occurrence. b. Failure to maintain vehicle in a manner that prevents nuisances such as leaky seals or hydraulics - $100.00 each occurrence. c. Failure to neglect to collect solid waste, recycling, (or yard wastelbulky goods) at those times provided by the Agreement within 24-hours after either oral or written -9- notice by City - $50.00 each occurrence. d. Failure or neglect to provide notice to involved resident when solid waste or recyclables refused for collection for cause - $25.00 each occurrence. e. Repeated failure or neglect to correct problems will be considered a breach of contract - $50.00 each occurrence. f. Failure to abide by the City's regular collection hours - $250.00 each occurrence. g. Missing entire blocks or neighborhoods. A missed block is defined as a block where residents from at least three households within two intersections of that block or cul- de-sac report that their material was out before 6:00 a.m., the material was not picked up within 24 hours after either oral or written notice from the City and the addresses did not appear on the records as unacceptable setouts - $250.00 each occurrence. h. District-wide collection not completed. The failure to complete a majority (50% or more) of pickups within the city or collection district on the scheduled collection day without following proper notification procedure - $2,500.00 per occurrence. 5. Legal Compliance. a. This Contract is governed by the laws of the State of Minnesota. The Contractor must obtain all licenses or permits to transact. a refuse collection business in the City, Anoka County, and the State of Minnesota. b. The Contractor will comply with all health rules, regulations, and ordinances of the City, Anoka County, and the State of Minnesota. If there is a conflict between the provisions of this contract and the pertinent ordinances, regulations, and statutes the more stringent requirements apply. c. The Contractor must report all violations of ordinances pertaining to garbage and refuse collection and disposal for enforcement purposes including all unsanitary or filthy conditions to the City. 6. Safety. The Contractor must provide and maintain sanitary and safety accommodations for the use and protection of its employees and comply with federal, state, and local safety codes and regulations. D. Payment Method. 1. Collection Service. Waste Management will bill each resident directly for the services provided per Attachment A. Attachment A may be modified jointly by the parties to reflect -10- F changes in tipping fees at the Anoka County facility. The parties may mutually agree to modify the Collection Service allowing the City to bill each resident directly if deemed appropriate by the City Administrator and City Council. The City will set the rates for service as they deem. appropriate and may deviate from Attachment A. The parties will meet on a quarterly basis to discuss delinquent accounts and forms of collection and Contractor will be responsible for mailing delinquent notices unless mutually agreed upon billing by the City. On an annual basis (September 1) the Contractor will provide a list of delinquent accounts to the City for certification to delinquent property owners. 2. Additional Collection Services. Charges for pickup of White goods will be included with the collection costs billed to the City at prices stated in Attachment B. Those prices are subject to change from time to time by the Contractor based on changes in disposal costs and subj ect to City approval. 3. Disposal Fees. The Contractor will pay all disposal fees resulting from the collections of City refuse and garbage. 4. Unmarketable Recvclables. The Contractor may retain the gross proceeds from the sale of recyclables. If the Contractor and the City determine that recyclables cannot be sold or given away, the City will advise residents that materials are to be disposed ofin the garbage and refuse rather than by recY9ling. V. INSURANCE. BOND & INDEMNIFICATION. The. Contractor must be licensed, bonded as required by City ordinances. The Contractor further agrees to take all precautions to protect the public against injury. The Contractor agrees to indemnify and hold harmless the City, its officers, agents, representatives, and employees from and against all damages, claims, losses, costs or expenses including reasonable attorneys' fees, which may be asserted against the City, or for which it may be held liable, to the extent resulting from any acts, omissions, or negligence of the Contractor, Contractor's agent, employees, subcontractors or sub-subcontractors while engaged in the performance of this Contract. The Contractor will indemnify the City against all claims, liens, expenses, and claims for liens, for work, tools, machinery, materials, or insurance premiums or equipment or supplies, and against all loss by reason of the failure of the Contractor, subcontractor, or sub-subcontractor in any respect to fully perform all obligations of this Contract, including reasonable attorneys' fees. Insurance Limits. During the entire period of the contract, the Contractor must maintain, at their expense, and file with the City, policies or certificates ofW orker's Compensation, Auto Liability, Mobile Equipment Liability, and General Liability insurance. The Contractor must also make certain all subcontractors and sub-subcontractors comply with these insurance requirements. The minimum liability insurance coverage requirements are as follows: Workers' Compensation' Statutory -11- \ Employer's Liability Auto Liability General Liability Mobile Equipment Liability $1,000,000/1,000,000/1,000,000 $1,000,000 CSL $1,000,000 CSL $1,000,000 CSL All liability policies evidencing insurance required by this paragraph must name City and the Contractor as named insureds with the exception of the Workers' Compensation Policy. They should be with companies doing business in the State of Minnesota and acceptable to the City such that the policies must be approved by the City Attorney and filed with the City Manager. A Certificate of Insurance showing the Contractor has in effect the required insurance must be filed with the City before the date of this contract is to be effective and must not be allowed to lapse. VI. NONDISCRIMINATION. Minnesota Statutes, Section 181.59 is adopted by reference. VII. TRANSFER. ASSIGNMENT. AND LIENS. A. Transfer or Sale. The Contractor may not sell, or assign all or part of this Contract without the City's prior written approval. The City may require as conditions to any such approval that: 1. Any proposed transferee must have the qualifications and financial responsibility, as reasonably determined by the City, necessary and adequate to fulfill the obligations undertaken in this Contract by Contractor; and 2. Any proposed transferee, by instrument in writing satisfactory to the City for itself and their successors and assigns, and expressly for the benefit of the City, have expressly assumed all of the obligations of service under this Contract and agreed to be subject to all the conditions and restrictions to which service is subject. It is the intent of this Section, together with other provisions of this Contract, that (to the fullest extent permitted by law and equity and excepting only in the manner and to the extent specifically provided otherwise in this Contract) no transfer of, or change with respect to, ownership or any part thereof, or any interest therein, however, consummated or occurring, whether voluntary or involuntary, will operate, legally or practically, to deprive or limit the City of or with respect to any rights or remedies or controls provided in or resulting from this Contract; and 3. The Contractor and assignee must submit to the City for review all instruments and other legal documents involved in effecting such transfer, and the City's approval must be indicated to the Contractor in writing. The proposed transferee must submit to the City for review all bonds, insurance policies, and any and all other documents required by this Contract, and the City's approval must be indicated to the proposed -12- transferee in writing. B. Pavment of Subcontractor and Employees. The Contractor agrees to promptly pay all persons doing work or furnishing skills, tools, machinery, or materials or insurance premiums or equipment or supplies and all just claims for such work, material, equipment insurance, and supplies in and above the performance of this Contract. Contractor agrees that it will hold City harmless from any claim described in this paragraph. VITI. OTHER PROVISIONS. A. Title. Title to all refuse, yard waste and recyclables collected remains in the Contractor until all the waste is delivered to the authorized processing plant, recycling center, or yard waste site. B. Ind~endent Contractors. The Contractor is an independent contractor. Nothing in this ContraCt is to be construed to create the relationship of employer and employee between the City and the Contractor or its agents, or make the Contractor, its agents, or employees of the City. IX. TERMINATION. A. The City may terminate this Contract if in the City's reasonable judgment there has been a breach of any provision by the Contractor, or if in the City's reasonable judgment there is other good cause for termination. B. Upon failure of the Contractor to fulfill any of the provisions of this contract, the City may be authorized to hire such personnel and equipment, or assign City employees and equipment, as may be necessary to do such work, and the cost of such expenses thereof may be charged and deducted from any monies due the Contractor, collected from the Contractor, or collected by recourse to the Contractor's financial guaranty. C. The Contractor will not be in breach and the City will have no right to terminate the agreement unless Contractor fails to cure the breach or fails to perform within 30 days of receipt by the Contractor of written notice from the City. The breach or failure must be cured to the satisfaction of the City Administrator. X. EN'I'IRE AGREEMENT. This Contract is the entire agreement between the parties. No modification of this Contract is valid or effective, unless made in writing and signed by the parties hereto. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have set their hands on the 12th Day of February 2003. -13- . CONTRACfOR -14- II -15- ATTACHMENT A MONTHLY RATES Effective January 1, 2003 For 2003 A three-tier system consisting of: . Monthly cost for the 35 gallon service will be $7.88 per residential unit . Monthly cost for the 64 gallon service will be $11.82 per residential unit . Monthly cost for the 96 gallon service will be $15.05 per residential unit · Monthly cost for seniorCltizens service will be $6.80 per resident These prices shall be adjusted by 3% in lieu of a fuel adjustment and/or CPI, whichever is less on January 1st of 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 and 2009 Service levels above include the disposal of one Christmas tree per year not wrapped in a plastic bag (free of ornaments and tinsel) from every residential dwelling unit. Single Stream Recycling Service: The rate for the bi-weekly service per residential unit which includes furnishing a 35, 64, or 96 gallon wheeled cart by the contractor shall be $3.45/month for 2003, and shall be adjusted by 3% and/or CPI, whichever is less on January 1st, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 and 2009. These carts become the property of the City at the end of this contract that expires December 31,2009 House count: Beginning on December 1st, 2003 and each December 1st thereafter for the term of the contract, the City agrees to submit a count of residential units by service type to the Contractor. These units will be used to calculate the contract costs beginning January 1 st, 2004 and each following January 1 st thereafter. Adjustment: Contractor will promptly notify City of changes in tipping fees at the Anoka County facility, and the rates specified herein will be modified accordingly. -16- ATTACHMENT B ADDIDONAL COLLECTION SERVICES The following is a list of charges for additional collection services as mentioned in Section N of the Contract: Auto seats - Beach ..........................................$22.50 Auto seats - Bucket.........................................$13.50 Bath tub ............. ........... .......... .................... .....$22.50 Carpet and/or pad ..............................................$1.50/sq. yd. Chair/Kitchen . ..... ..... ....... .... .............. .......... ....$1 0.00 Chair-Upholstered .. ......... ............... .......... .......$15 .00 Couch............................................................. .$20. 00 Garbage over limit (under 30 1bs.) ....................$2.00/30 gal. bag Hide-a-bed............................... ...................... ..$3 O. 00 Mattress/Box spring ........................................$15.00 each/any size Sink .. ............................... ....... .........................$15 .00 Television console..... ....... .................. ....... .... ..$25.00 Television portable...... ...................... ...... ........$15 .00 Tire - car (with rim) ........................................$10.00 Tire - car (without rim) ........................:............$5.00 Toilet. ...................... ................. ........ ......... ......$15 .00 White Goods ................ ........ ..... .................... ..$25.00 White Goods (with Freon) ..............................$35.00 -17- Attachment C Sum2 and Fall clean uu services The City may designate a Saturday in the spring and/or fall of each year (other than a Saturday on which collection services are performed) "Clean-Up Day". Each residential dwelling unit may deliver non-standard collection materials, yard waste garden waste, brush to a designated drop off site. This clean up shall be subsidized 1/3 by the City, as per attached schedule: Pick up/minivan load ...........................................$30.00 Station wagon load..... ................... ............... ...... ..$12.00 Car load................................................................. .$9.00 Trailer (4 'x4 'x8') ..................... ...... ......................$30.00 Mattress (any size) ...............................................$12.00 Box Spring (any size)...........................................$12.00 Appliance (any size ).............................................$15.00 Appliance (with freon) .........................................$24.00 Stuffed chair ........ .............. ........... ...................... ....$6.00 Couch .................... .... ......................... ..................$12.00 Tires (car each).......................................................$1.50 Tires on rim (car each) ...........................................$2.40 Automotive Batteries ............. ........... ............... ......$1.50 Electronics (based on size).....................................$5 to $25 each Brush..................................................................... .$9. OO/yard These prices shall be adjusted with the change of disposal rates. The contractor shall furnish sufficient staff to operate a clean up day. The charges to the residents shall be 2/3 of the above rates. The contractor shall collect the revenue from the resident at the clean up and invoice the City their 1/3. All records of clean-up, addresses and payments will be provided to the City. -18- Attachment D Vehicles Used in Centerville #100232 (Automated side-load trash) #100226 (Automated side-load trash) #100224 (Automated side-load trash) -19- Attachment E City Locations for Pick-ups City of Centerville (City Hall) .......................................1880 Main Street City ofCenterville (Public Works) ................................7087 - 20th Avenue Acorn Creek Park...........................................................1874 Revior Eagle Park ......................................................................6955 Dupre Road Laurie LaMotte Park ......................................................6970 LaMotte Drive McBride Memorial Park ................................................1875 Fox Run Royal Meadows Park ..................................................... 7161 West Robin Lane -20- A. Additional Collecti ,ltt Service. Refuse in excess of the desigaated volume-base per residential d~ unit or residential dwelling units desiring collection ofitems from _location othertha l the boulevard adjoining the curb. B. Bulky items. Lar~ ~ hOmlehold items including carpeting and padding. mattresses" cp,ain;, couches, tal: lea, and other such items of furnitllre which ere too large for one person to pick up. c. Collection Service. Collection service is a pnva.t,e opmtian CIlpged in collection and transpOrtation of re llse. yard waste and rec.yclables. ' D. Dav-C~aiI!, Collce:im.. Day-Certain collec:tion is a City-approved plan for weekly collection servi~ by an established day-certain schedule. This schedule requires refuse, yard waste~ ;.o.d. recyclable collection on the same day of each week and is based on five (5) da.Y. M< nc1a.y through Friday, working week. The only exceptions to the "day-certain" plan E :1al1 be during those weeks in which occur legal holidays. E. Garbage. Garbage :8 organic waste, including discarded material resulting from the b.mcUing, procegsm 1, storage, preparation, serving, and consumption of food. F. Indeaendent Con1ral:~ l'ndependant conuac'tOt means person or persons authorized by the Contractor.to.~ .:tom xefuse collection services withm the City. ~." ~~l;T1is. Notie:;S sont to residential dwelling units ad.vertising rates or services not ~ available under this X\ntract. H. Recyc:lablee. Recyc abies are reusable or re-processable materials approved. and agreed to by the p~ here to. Recyclables may include mch items as newspaper. plastics Et1l a neclt. magazines, junk mail. C:Otrllgated cardboarc:i, ledger paper. bi-metal QaD.s~ aluminum, and glas :1. R.ecyclahles specifically excludes refuse and yard waste. I. Re:fb.se. Refuse is p' .trescible and nonputrescible 'solid waste from tesidences including garbage and tubbisl, and speeiIicaJJy excluding yard waste. reoyelables~ and toxic and hazardous wastes. '~efuse further e1(oludes ind1lStrial. commercial. agricultural, and constrnc:tion garbaS..l or rubbish and wastes. J. Resideo,tial DwellinJ;.Ymt .A. residential dwelling unit is any single family dwelling unit' and. each unit of ad, :plEm. A residential dwelling unitshall not include: mobile homes. tri-plexes. four-pleJ ~, town hemes, condominiums. or apartment buildings. K. Rubbish. Rubbish i :, solid waste, including ashes, consisting of both combustible and noncombustible wa :tes. such as wood, bedding, c.rockery, and other nonwreuseable -2- 2:0 3EYi1d .LN3W39l;;1N'\1W3lS~ LLPQ€8L€gL Pt:SB EBQZlzt/8B I 1/ / II / E0 3~d (:) The driver and coUector(s) shall have the ability to remember the order of collection and location of all conta.in.ers on the assigned routes. (. .) 'I'l1e driver and collector(s) shall make a concerted effort to have at aU tUnes a presentable appearance. (: ') The collector(s) on each crew shall be physiQaIly able to' perform their duties and be at least eighteen (18) years old. (c.) ThecolleetorCs) shallperf'orm theirwor:k in a neat and quietmmmer and olean up all refUse, yard waste oX' recyclables spilled in collection under any citeumstance. (' ') All contmners shall be replaced on the boulevard adjoiDing .the Curb. (I:) Damage to oontainers or other property shall be avoided. (! -) Gratuities shall not be accepted. f 0) COD.$1.Unption of any beverages containing alcohol or controlled substances shall be forbidden during or before work ho1.U'S of any collection day. (: 1) Before the start of each collection day, the collection crew shall check to see th8.t the collection vehicle is equipped with at least one broom and shovel for use in cleaning up refuse. yard waste, or rec:yclables spilJed during collection or hauling. 3. SunervisiQ}!. The City shall appoi:o.t a. representative to insure that the provisions of this Con ract are being carried out accordingly. Contractor agrees to fully cooperate: with this provision to achieve contraCt compliance. 4. Liquidated D .1ilJ1&iU. The Contractor agrees, in addition to any other remedies available to the City, the City may :find the Contractor in the amoUtlts.speeified below as 'iquidated damages for failure of the Contraetorto fulfill its obligations. The C~ will notify the Contractor in writing documenting the nature of the violation, the history of the the account, if any, and the reason for the fiQ.e. The Contract< r shall then have the opportunity to address and remedy the issue at which pc :nt the City shall determine if a fine is still appropriato, in their sole determin: 'don. The Contractor shall notify City in writing of its remedy. .12. J.N3W3e'v'N'\1W3lSt'M LL1i9E8Le:9L pt:60 e:ee~/Zt/80 1;>0 ~d 2.. I :wure to clean up solid waste spilled. by Contractor within six (6) hours c :- oral or wril1.en notification. $50.00 each instance. b. F .ailure to JJulmrAm vehicle in a matI~ which prevents nuisances such as II 'sky seals or hydraulics - $100.00 each instance. c. F ;wure to neglect to collect solid waste, recycling. (or yard waste!bulky 8.>ods if part of the proposal) at those times provided by.the Agreement \l itbin 24-hours after either oral or written notice by City - $50.00 each iJ 'stance. d. F:U1u.re or neglect to provide notice to resident upon solid waste or 1'1 ~cyclablBS refused for collection for cause - $25.00 each instance. e. !l:, addition to ..hove, fail'lU'S or neglect to COlTect chronic problems win b,; considered Ii Breach of Contraet - $50.00 each iDstance. f. Fwure to abide by the Citts regular collection hours - $250.00 eaGh h ,stance. g. F .tilure to collect recyclables. whioh are propBl'ly prepared and placed. for c ,llection as part of1he collection program - $25.00 each instance. h. z.. !issing entire blocks/neighborhoods. A missed block is defioed as a b ock wh$'e residents from at least three (3) households within two :iz tersections of tha.t block or eul-de-sac report that their material was out b :~fote 7:00 8J[l.. the material was not picked up and. the addresses did not a.: :'pear on the records as unacceptable setouts. $250.00 each instance. 1. r: (strict-wide collection not completed. The failure to complete a n ~ori1y (.50010 or mote) of pickups within the city or collection distrlct on t1': scheduled collection day without following proper notification p: 'oeedure - $2~500.00 per instance. j. T 'le City 5hall impose a chatae agaf;ost the Contractor payable to the City fc r rnirnailings sent 10 residemial dwelliDs tmits. The Contractor is also re ;iponsible to give written notice to those residents within thirty (30) dl:YS as to the en-or ana reason for the .mismailing. The Contractor shall bl'ar fhll responsibi1i1y and expenses mcUtted for notifYing residents of tl: ': mismailing . $2S().OO per instance. 5. Legal Co~li:mgg. -13- .LN3W3Slj/N'ii'W3lSliM LLt?SE:8LE:9L 1;>t:60 E:Be~/~t/8B ." 18 August 2003 To: Honorable Mayor Sweeney Centerville City Council members From: . Tom W1lharber Centervi11e Lions Treasurer I am pleased to report the accounting for the Fete des Lacs 2003 celebration funds that were donated by the City ofCenterville. On behalf of the Centerville Lions Club, I want to thank you for your support for the Festival. I have only heard very good things regarding the fireworks, teen dance, parade, ball tournament, kids carnival and food The weather this year cooperated with us, but that could be in part because we purchased insurance in case of loss revenues due to weather related events. Attached find a sp~d~heet detailmg the expenses, which had been paid by your DJDdlng, this is a preHmmary report until I receive the final statements and perform reconciliation. If there are any questions, feel:free to call me at my home (651) 429-2140. I thank you for the time and effort you give to the citize!l8 and businesses of Centerville. Respectfully submitted, Tom W1lharber Treasurer Centerville Lions Club 1 Encl as / t! ~ 8 ~ CU 0 CD 0 = N '0 J9 c: CD E i Ol c: ..! :c c: CD Oc= CD jQ = Je c 0 Q) c: U ~ '0 "C ~ c: CU 0 CD > >- ~ ..c "C ~ Q) "C ; os: c: e ~ Ol a. c: ; en c: "C ~. c 8 .a CU en ~ 0 CU cu c: ....J :~ en e Q) c. "C CU Q) .~ CD rn :E 11. I- oooo~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ NONNNm~~N~~~~~~~NN~~N CD~N~~~~~~~N~NNNNNmm~~~ o~~~N~~~~mvvvv~v~~~mo~ c:~~~~N~~om~~m~~~o~~o~~ ~~~riririririri~~~~d~~~ri~~*- cu~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ lD ~~~~~~~~~~~ I "C .r= .... ~ o o d ~ N ~ ONO~OOOOOOOOOOOO~O om~~ov~oooooomomv~ ~~m~d~mcicicidddNd~~~ ~~~~~~voooooo~o~~~ N~~~~~~v~~oo~~~~~~ ~~ ~~~~~~~ri~ ~~ ~~~ ~~ o N .........: l5 CD~ c o o d o o ri ~ ~ .s rn E ~ ~ o 6 2 rn is. & 32 0_ C"C ~. C. m rn ~i-C: ~ ~ c fi""o;"Eo.l&l "C -II) ~ [ B ; ~~a~~enCD ffiCDS= IE '0 CD - 0- L.,g 0 E c CD .S m'~ fi u. ~ Ol "C m.r= ~-L.E c:_ rnC:~cuaJ c: CUL."C ~-- II- ~~.r=ornCD c:~I-_- Ecuc: O==CD rn8~.r=cnc:m~~cu-c:=1 CD 0.;. .r= .r= - - ..- en - c CD 1: - 'v L. .r= ~~~ 1-1-1-~2ioo.r=ffirnmCDcu~O~1- ~~~ ~~~~cui~~~E&~~~CD~~~o.;. .r=cuo ~oo~rn_.r=~~rn.r=cu~CE~oo~ oEm C~~CD~I~I-NOO~~CC~z~o .... .... o 0 ~E E CD 0 0.;. .... 0 E "C _.r= - CD~o.;.CD~ ~o8.~ -is. 1;)1: 0 f!.... - ~ ~iio~~:EO ~ [~o~ ffi;rn_=~~OOen~ .r= '~-Ol m~~j~~[~~i~~~~~~~ ~~~~ ~cnC~~~&~0~fi~&lfi~fi~~~~~~ ~CDCUCD~Olcu~CD~CDCDCDCDCDCD~L.rn 0lL. c~"Cc:"C~cu~cu"CS"C"C"C"C"C"C~~8~CU[ CD>~~~~~"EC~C:~~~~~~c:CD ~~ > ~ CUoC cu CD 0- CD cu CD cu cu cu cu cu cu CD.~ ~ 0 0 w~~O~~~~~~~~~~~~~I-u.u.I-~Z ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 999999999999999999999 C:~~---------------0l0l0l cucucu~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ CD7~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~c~~ m~N~~~NNNNNNNNNNN~~~~~ C NN ~ ~ CHIEF'S REPORT JULY 2003 Sincerest sympathy to Chair Varian on the loss of her father-in-law and to Commissioner Korst on the loss of his mother. Our thoughts and prayers for you continue. May sweet memories of your time with them and God's peace comfort you. I was able to spend quality time off with my family during the month of July. A highlight was visiting the bible camp my parents were the first directors of during the 70's. All of my siblings were present and we participated in many of the camp activities available to campers including; horseback riding, swimming, water slides, the "blob", canoeing, hiking, camp fires, and believe it or not... a zip line. Yes even my retired brother-in-law and I tried that onel Don't worry you won't see either ofus trying out for the TV show Fear Factorl Very meaningful to us was the camp dorm named the "Heckman House" in honor of my parents and the roadway to the present camp director's home named "Heckman Lane." . Employees and staff enjoyed thirty-two days of vacation and sixteen holidays off during _. July and found it necessary to utilize six sick leave days. Administrative Sergeant Nelson continued his training during the entire month at the Northwestern University School of Police Staff and Command and graduated from that program on August 1st. I was privileged to attend that ceremony with Sgt. Nelson and his entire family. I have asked Sgt. Nelson to give a short snmmary of his training experience at our meeting and to provide a copy of his paper to each ofyau. Deputy Chief Makela attended the alumni FBI annual training that was held in Wmnipeg Manitoba, Officer Fruetel attended a narcotics investigation class, Inv. Blanck and Officer Bragelman attended an active shooter train the trainer class and all department officers attended a SMG and handgun outdoor shoot sponsored by our use of force instructors, Sgt. Gleason, Officers Krueger and Bragelman. Meetings I attended during July included our regularly scheduled commission meeting and two management meetings. All scheduled county-wide meetings were missed because of my vacation schedule. !. " Centennia['Lilk~s Pol~ce' Departme.nt 200 Civic Heights Circle, Circle ~,MN 55014 (7.63) 7~2501 Fax (763) 784-0082 AGEImA FOR THE CENTENNIAL LAKES JOINT POLICE COmIISSION August 14, 2003 cmCLE PINES CITY HALL THE HEETIlfG WILL CO~ AT .7: 00 P .K. , 1. . ,CALL TO 9RDEB.. 2'. ROLL CALL ~ 3,~ ',P1mtIC FoRUII - 7:05 p~m. - Report From Admin:t,strative SergeB.;Jlt' Nelson . On my' Staff & Coinmand Sch9ol. .. ".' ,- '. 4. COmlrSSIOImRS" COIlMENTs. s. .cONSENT AG!;RDA - Consent Ag~~da' items will be acted o~ with one motion unless a Commissi,oner. requests, the,i~ pla:cement~n :tl1e ,rE7gular agenda. ' , , A. Approval O~,.Miriutes of July '10; 2~03,Regular 'Commission ,M~,etitlg, ~' Pag~, 3., . . B. ,Monthly' Finand,d. 'Report,' -':JUly, 200~ Page, '11.' , ,( C..Ratifie~tiqn Of ~iily, 2003 Expenses: - Page. 14., ' 6. ACTIOa ITEMS: . , ," ,A. ne~art~ent Mold Is~ue -P~ge 22.. ' B. ~q04 'Budget Discussion.' " ,c.' Alcohol Compliance ~hecks ,- :Page 2.8. .., .. '.. D. Retire'd Officer'ID',Garq'Re.quest. E. Officer Resignation Page, 29. ~. ..' ~ .pa,ge Two August 14, 2003 7 .' HISCEJ:.I,ANEOUS ITEMS: .A. Quad- City ~olice Depar~ment. ,. B. Monthly Activity.Report.- ~age 30. C. Monthly Department Summari~ - Page 32. 8. EXECUTIVE CLOSED SESSION: A. rhe Purpose Of This Session Is To Discuss Disciplinary Issues. 9. ADJOuRmmRT ..' , . ' . . , .. .; .', .. ,. . " ., . . \ '.'\ . , , . "-:. . 3. / Unapproved Minutes Centennial Lakes Police Commission Meeting July 10, 2003 At Circle Pines City Hall 1. CALL TO ORDER The meeting was called to order by Chair Karen Varian at 7: 1 0 PM. 2. ROLL CALL: Chair Varian Commissioner Lund Commissioner Pitchford Commissioner Korst - Absent Commissioner Mahr Commissioner Grahek - Absent Commissioner Sweeney (arrived at 7:13 p.m.) Commissioner Simons Commissioner Heifort Commissioner Anderson Ex Officio: Chief Heckman 3. PUBLIC FORUM - 7:05 p.m. There was no one present for Open Forum. 4. COMMISSIONERS' COMMENTS Chief Heckman stated former Commissioner Wright decided to accept his plaque at the Departmental meeting on August 13 at 4:00 p. m. Commissioner Sweeney stated Commissioner Anderson had been approved by the Council to be on the Commission. Chair Varian requested a copy of the Council Minutes for the record. She welcomec;i Commissioner Anderson to the Commission. 5. CONSENT AGENDA A. Approval of Minutes of June 12, 2003, Regular Commission Meeting. if, Centennial Lakes Police Commission Meeting July 10, 2003 Page 2 of 7 Chief Heckman requested on Page 7, under number C, third sentence change Officer Blanck to Officer Fruete!. B. Monthly Financial Report - June, 2003. C. Ratification of June, 2003 Expenses. MOTION: Commissioner Sweeney made a motion that the Consent Agenda be approved, seconded by Commissioner Lund. The motion was aDoroved. Commissioner Anderson abstained to the Aoproval of the Minutes. 6. ACTION ITEMS A Hazard Mitigation Resolution Chief Heckman stated Anoka County was participating in a hazard mitigation planning process, which established a framework for the development of a County hazard mitigation plan. He recommended adoption of this Resolution by the Department. MOTION: Commissioner Sweeney made a motion to recommend adoption of the Hazard Mitigation Resolution, seconded by Commissioner Pitchfor~. The motion was unanimouslv aDDroved. B. Safe and Sober Resolution Chief Heckman stated this Resolution was for the upcoming Safe and Sober grant starting in 2003 and ending in 2004. He indicated this grant would be done in the same manner as with past Safe and Sober grants. He stated they would work a. number of waves and the money from the grant would be used to pay officers overtime to work these waves. Most waves would be four hours in length and officers would enforce the laws regarding the impaired driver, seat belt, underage drinking and driving, the aggressive driver, etc. He noted $60,000 was being requested, but they would now know hOw much was being awarded until the grant was returned to the lead agency. He recommended adoption of this Resolution by the Departnient. D~ Centennial Lakes Police Commission Meeting July 10. 2003 Page 30f7 MOTION: Commissioner Anderson made a motion to adopt the Safe and Sober Resolution, seconded by Commissioner Sweeney. The motion was unanimouslv approved. c. Department Mold Issue Chair Varian stated she had met with the Circle Pines City Manager today. She indicated she had done some research regarding mold since the last meeting and summarized her findings. She stated the City Manager had told her it was McGregor Pierce who recommended removing the tree and putting rock in its place. She stated they talked about the samples that were taken and noted there was not any standards for mold anywhere, but the City Manager stated he believed McGregor Pierce had standards. She stated one of the areas of concern was the secretarial space and McGregor Pierce would be obtaining more information regarding this area. Commissioner Mahr asked if the carpeting had been removed. Chair Varian replied it had not been replaced, and apparently, McGregor Pierce did not believe replacement was necessary. Commissioner Lund asked why would they want to keep the carpet. Chair Varian replied the City Manager had agreed to replace the ceiling tiles. She stated he would have McGregor Pierce come in and do further sampling. Chief Heckman stated the City Manager was uncomfortable with putting flooring down, . until the issues were all addressed. Chair Varian stated she did not see why they could not put in a ceramic or vinyl floor in now and deal with the remaining issues later. Commissioner Anderson stated they should not wait until the questions were answered before replacing the floor. Chief Heckman noted McGregor Pierce would not talk to the personnel in the. Department and would only talk to the City Manager because the City was paying for their services. Chair Varian stated she would follow up with the City Manager and request getting the information they want in writing from McGregor Pierce. Chair Varian suggested the employees who were having issue with the mold have their doctor identify which mold they were having problems with so they could make an ADA claim. if necessary. f' Co ., Centennial Lakes Police Commission Meeting July 10, 2003 Page 4 of? Commissioner Pitchford stated a letter needed to go to the City stating all carpeting should be removed in the Department and replaced with ceramic tile. Chair Varian stated the City Manager believed the ventilation system was not a problem, but she would ask how often they were changing the filter in the system. Chair Varian stated the air conditioning had been updated recently. Chief Heckman replied that was correct, but they had not maintained it properly by removing the cottonwood seeds. Commissioner Lund asked if they had authorized $1,500 for a second opinion. Chair Varian replied the City Manager wanted them to talk to him first before doing anything. Commissioner Lund stated he wanted a second opinion and that way, the Commission would have their own expert who would answer to them and not the City Manager. Commissioner Heifort replied she was uncomfortable with McGregor Pierce not willing to put anything in writing and stated she also wanted to obtain a second opinion. Chair Varian noted they would follow through on obtaining the second opinion. D. 2004 Budget Chief Heckman summarized the 2004 Budget options he had prepared. Commissioner Mahr asked how much were the capital improvement funds normally. Chief Heckman replied they were .$5,000 and that was eliminated in the first budget. Chair Varian asked if they wanted to continue the budget discussion until next month once they knew more about the possible merger. Commissioner Pitchford asked if there was a possibility of having the Committee working with the Quad Cities to state if there was not any decision made by August, that nothing would happen until after 2004. Commissioner Mahr replied they did not have the power to make those decisions. ~7 Centennial lakes Police Commission Meeting July 10, 2003 Page 5 of7 Commissioner Sweeney stated he did not believe this was an option. He noted while they might not make the January 1 deadline, but there would probably be another deadline set Commissioner Pitchford replied all they wanted to know was a firm deadline so they could inform the officers and staff as soon as possible. Commissioner Heifort stated as soon as a decision was made, everyone would know of that decision. Commissioner Mahr suggested Chief Heckman look at the possibility of restructuring the department personnel to address the issue of officers resigning. Commissioner Sweeney stated he would like to continue this discussion until next month. Commissioner Anderson replied he did not know if they could table this until next month because they needed to get the figures to the three City Councils. Commissioner Lund stated he would like to approve the budget of a three percent increase in salaries. Chief Heckman stated he believed the Officers would take a pay cut, rather than lose an Officer by a lay-off. Commissioner Simons also believed they should go with the first budget showing the three percent increase in salaries. MOTION: Commissioner Lund made a motion to send the City Councils the three percent increase budget, seconded by Commissioner Simons. The motion was approved. Commissioner Sweeney - Nav. Chair Varian asked if they wanted a joint meeting with the Council members to go over the budget or did they want to wait until next month. . The Commission agreed they would wait until next month to discuss this. E. RESIGNA nON Chief Heckman stated he had received a Letter of Resignation from Mike Jensen effective July 23, 2003. He requested a Motion to accept this resignation and asked if the Commission wanted them to start the testing process. ~ Centennial Lakes Police Commission Meeting July 10, 2003 Page 6 of? Commissioner Mahr suggested Chief Heckman look into the possibility that the Investigator go into the shift rotation and hire an administrator position and wait until next month to decide if they were going to begin the testing process. Chief Heckman stated he would be meeting with. management to discuss the shift rotation. Commissioner Pitchford requested a letter be sent on behalf of the Commission to Officer Jensen. Chair Varian stated she would work on a letter with Chief Heckman. MOTION: Commissioner Anderson made a motion to accept the Letter of Resignation from Officer Mike Jensen effective July 23, 2003, seconded by Commissioner Sweeney. The motion was unanimouslv aDDroved. F. PART-TIMECSO Chief Heckman stated one of the CSO officers came to him last week regarding his inability to work his hours due to a scheduled trip. He stated he has approved this and there would be only one day that the other CSO could not cover the shift. -.. 7. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS A. Quad City Police Department Commissioner Mahr stated there was a mee~ing scheduled next Wednesday and they would have more information a~er that meeting. She noted there was an issue regarding the voting structure and that would determine if this went through. Commissioner Sweeney stated they would know after next Wednesday if this was going forward or not. Commissioner Heifort stated nothing should be stalled pending this approval. B. Monthly Activity Report Chief Heckman presented the Monthly Activity Report and asked for any Commissioner comments. (11 Centennial Lakes Police Commission Meeting July 10, 2003 Page? of? Commissioner Pitchford asked for an update on kids on top of the maintenance building in Lexington. Chief Heckman stated he had an officer handle the report and it was suggested the City post signs. He stated the office should not have suggested posting signs, but the officer had handled the situation with the kids on the building appropriately. C. Monthly Department Summaries Chief Heckman presented the Monthly Department summaries and asked for any Commissioner comments. Commissioner Lund asked Chief Heckman to find out what gang members were in the community. D. Update on Department Unclaimed Weapons Chief Heckman updated the Commission on the Departmenfs unclaimed weapons. He stated he had spoken with the SCA on the weapon disposal and was informed that none of the weapons had to be marked, but the SCA was interested in destroying the weapons for the City. 8. ADJOURNMENT MOTION: Commissioner Sweeney made a motion to adjourn, seconded by Commissioner Pitchford. The motion was unanimouslv aDDroved. Time of adioumment was 8:43 PM CST. ., J trust these minutes are an accurate record of the Centennial Lakes Police Commission meeting of July 10, 2003. Sincerely, Kathy Altman, Recording Secretary nmeSaver Off Site Secretarial /0, CENTENNIAL lAKES POLICE DEPT BALANCE SHEET JULY 31, 2003 POLICE GENERAL FUND' ASSETS 901-10100 CASH-US BANK 901-10110 CASH-4-M FUND 901-10115 INVESTMENTS 4-M 901-10120 CASH-EXPLORERS POST 901-10200 PETTY CASH 189,137.57 3,496.73 '100,000.00 1,276.27 50.00 TOTAL ASSETS 293,960.57 L1ABIUTIES AND EQUITY LIABILITIES 901-21600 SALARIES-PAYABLE 901-21650 BENEFITS PAYABLE 10,054.00 15,732.00 TOTAL LIABILITIES 25,786.00 FUND EQUITY 901-24000 DESIGNATED FUND BAL-BENEFITS 901-25320 UNRESERVED FUND BALANCE REVENUE OVER EXPENDITURES - YTD 140,000.00 80,375.93 47,798.64 . TOTAL FUND EQUITY TOTAL LIABILITIES AND EQUITY 268,174.57 293,960.57 ! II CENTENNIAL LAKES POLICE DEPT REVENUES WITH COMPARISON TO BUDGET FOR THE 7 MONTHS ENDING JULY 31,2003 POUCE GENERAL FUND PERIOD BUDGET %OF ACTUAl YTD ACTUAl AMOUNT VARIANCE BUDGET CONTRACT REVENUES 901-31-1210-000 CIRCLE PINES CONTRACT 49,716.69 348,009.13 696,687.00 248,677.87 ) 68.33 901-31-1220-000 LEXINGTON CONTRACT 41,776.92 292,438.43 601,323.00 208,884.67 ) 68.33 901-31-1230-000 CENTERVlLLE CONTRACT 40,379.08 282,663.60 484,549.00 201,895.40 ) 68.33 901-31-1240-000 TRI-CrrY START UP .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 TOTAl CONTRACT REVENUES 131,871.69 923,101.16 1,682,469.00 669,367.84 ) 68.33 INTERGOVERNMENTAl AIDS 901-33-3105-000 GRANTS-FEDERAl COPS FAST 6,260.00 18,760.00 26,000.00 6,260.00 ) 75.00 901-33-3110-000 GRANTS-NBNCOPS~MMLCO~ .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 901-33-3115-000 GRANTS-COPS MORE (EQUIPMENl) .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 901-33-3120-000 GRANTS-STATE SNOWMOBILE .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 901-33-3126-000 ANOKA COUNTY GRANTS .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 901-33-3130-000 STATE TRAINING REIMBURSEMENT .00 .00 6,500.00 5,500.00 ) .00 901-33-3133-000 STATE GRANTSlREIMBURSEMENTS .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 901-33-3136-000 COPS FAST GRANT (PRIOR) .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 901-33-3140-000 SMAlL COMMUNmES GRANT .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 901-33-3170-000 DARE FUNDS- CENTENNIAl SClPTA .00 1,700.00 .00 1,700.00 .00 TOTAl INTERGOVERNMENTAl AIDS 6,260.00 20,460.00 30,500.00 10,050.00 ) 67.05 PUBUC CHARGES FOR SERVICE 901-34-4110-000 COPIESIREPORT RECORDSlNOTARY .00 714.91 2,000.00 1,285.09 ) 36.75 TOTAl PUBUC CHARGES FOR SERVICE .00 714.91 2,000.00 1,285.09 ) 35.75 MISCELlANEOUS REVENUES 901-36-6210-000 INTEREST ON INVESTMENTS 161.19 1,748.43 1,250.00 498.43 139.87 901-36-6230-000 COMMISSION SAlARY REIMB 400.00 2,000.00 4,800.00 2,800.00 ) 41.67 901-38-6233-000 SPECIAl EVENT RElMB 89.70 ) 322.32 5,000.00 4,6n.68 ) 6.46 901-36-6235-000 MISCELlANEOUS 165.00 1,162.19 4,500.00 3,337.81 ) 26.83 901-36-6238-000 CLOSE EXPLORERS ACCOUNT .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 901-36-6240-000 VEHICLE & EQUIPMENT SALES .00 .00 5,000.00 6,000.00 ) .00 901-36-6246-000 FORFEITURES 2,649.07 8,059.28 5,000.00 1,069.28 121.19 901-36-6250-000 DONATIONS .00 .00 1,000.00 1,000.00 ) .00 901-36-6256-000 DONATlON-DEABRlLLATOR .00 8,700.00 .00 8,700.00 .00 901-36-6280-000 DONATlONS-CRlME PREVENTION .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 TOTAl MISCELLANEOUS REVENUES 3,286.68 17,992.22 28,560.00 8,667.78 ) 67.77 TOTAl FUND REVENUE 141,407.15 962,268.29 1,641,509.00 ( 679,260.71 ) 68.62 FORACMINISTRATION USE ONLY 58 % OF THE FISCAL YEAR HAS ELAPSED 08/0812003 11 :05AM PAGE: 1 /~.~ CENTENNIAL LAKES POLICE DEPT EXPENSES COMPARED TO BUDGET BY EXPENSE CODES FOR THE 7 MONTHS ENDING JULY 31. 2003 POLICE DEPARTMENT MTD ACTUAL YTD ACTUAL BUDGET VARIANCE % OF BUDGET POUCE OPERATIONS 901-42-2100-101 POLlCE-sALARlE8-FUU- TIME 84,416.48 581,941.53 1,018,815.00 436,873.47 57.12 901-42-2100-102 POLlCE-sALARlES OVERTIME 1,258.52 10,452.03 40,000.00 29,547.97 26.13 901-42-2100-103 POLlCE-sALARlE8-PART-TIME 3,298.89 17,226.30 34,480.00 17,253.70 49.96 901-42-2100-106 POLlCE-COMMISSION SALARIES .00 2,320.00 4,800.00 2,480.00 48.33 901-42-2100-110 UNCOMPENSATED ABSENCES .00 .00 25,000.00 25,000.00 .00 901-42-2100-121 POLlCE-PERA 7,012.29 52,762.36 97,024.00 44,261.84 54.38 901-42-2100-122 POLICE-FICA 705.22 4,706.61 7,650.00 2,943.39 61.52 901-42-2100-123 POLlCE-MEDICARE 1,048.92 7,004.33 13,477.00 6,472.67 51.97 901-42-2100-130 POLICE-HEAL THlUFElDISABlDENTA 9,958.04 76,273.92 103,713.00 27,439.08 73.54 901-42-2100-131 SELECT ACCOUNT FEES .00 660.00 1,200.00 540.00 55.00 901-42-2100-150 POLICE-WORKERS COMP INSURANCE .00 26,~7.00 21,400.00 5,247.00 ) 124.52 PERSONNEL 107,694.36 779,994.08 1,367,569.00 587,584.92 57.04 901-42-2100-201 POUCE-OFFlCE SUPPLIES 368.49 2,315.48 5,000.00 2,684.52 46.31 901-42-2100-202 POLlCE-CLEANING SUPPLIES 8.59 79.85 500.00 420.15 15.97 901-42-2100-203 POLICE-PRINTED FORMS .00 826.40 2,000.00 1,173.60 41.32 901-42-2100-211 POLlCE-INTOXIL VZER SUPPLIES 101.18 101.18 600.00 498.82 16.86 901-42-2100-212 POLICE-FUEL .00 10,403.06 24,000.00 13,596.94 43.35 901-42-2100-213 POLlCE-OIL & LUBRICANTS .00 67.81 200.00 132.19 33.91 901-42-2100-214 POLlCE-AlV & SNOWMOBILE SUPPLY .00 14.50 300.00 285.50 4.83 901-42-2100-215 POLlCE-AMMO & AREARM SUPPLIES .00 .00 3,000.00 3,000.00 .00 90 1-42-21 00-216 POUCE-MEDICAUFIRE SUPPLIES . .00 430.56 1,500.00 1,089.44 28.70 901-42;zl00-217 POLlCE-INVESllGATlON SUPPLIES 198.37 330.67 1,200.00 869.33 27.58 901-42-2100-218 POLlCE-UNIFORMS 961.03 2,463.10 8,000.00 5,536.90 30.79 901-42-2100-219 POLlCE-CRlME PREVENTION SUPPLY .00 .00 1,000.00 1,000.00 .00 SUPPUES 1,625.86 17,032.61 47,300.00 30,267.39 36.01 901-42-2100-301 POLlCE-AUDITIACCTlNG SERVICES 515.00 6,040.00 12,000..00 5,960.00 50.33 901-42-2100-304 POLICE-LEGAL FEES .00 .00 5,000.00 5,000.00 .00 901-42-2100-306 POLlC~PERSONNELTESTlNG .00 .00 2,500.00 2,500.00 .oil 901-42-2100-309 POLICE-LABOR RELATIONS .00 463.25 1,600.00 1,036.76 30.88 901-42-2100-312 POLlCE-CONTRACT TYPING 158.50 924.75 960,00 35.25 96.33 901-42-2100-321 POLICE-TELEPHONE 443.28 3,677.35 7,000.00 3,322.85 52.53 901-42-2100-322 POUCE-POSTAGE .00 38.58 1,600.00 1,581.42 2.41 901-42.2100-331 POUCE-TRAVEUTRA1NING 266.00 3,671.76 16,000.00 12,326.24 22.95 901-42-2100-351 POLICE-PRINTING & PUBLISHING 60.00 50.00 300.00 250.00 16.67 901-42-2100-361 POUCE-PROPERTYIUABIL1lY INS 9,470.50 25,249.00 30,600.00 5,551.00 81.98 901-42-2100-360 POLICE-UTILITIES 124.40 1,108.82 3,500.00 2,391.18 31.68 901-42-2100-385 POLlCE-CJRS ACCESS 390.00 780.00 1,800.00 1,020.00 43.33 901-42-2100-386 POLlCE-MDT ACCESS 1,353.40 3,572.73 4,500.00 927.27 79.39 CONTRACTED SERVICES 12,770.08 45,576.24 87,480.00 41,883.78 52.11 FOR ADMINISTRATION USE ONLY 58 % OF THE ASCAL YEAR HAS ELAPSED 0810812003 11:04AM PAGE: 1 13 · CENTENNIAL LAKES POLICE DEPT EXPENSES COMPARED TO BUDGET BY EXPENSE CODES FOR THE 7 MONTHS ENDING JULY 31, 2003 POLICE DEPARTMENT MTD ACTUAL YTD ACTUAL BUDGET VARIANCE % OF BUDGET 901-42-2100-401 POLlCE-BUILDINGlGROUNDS MTC 51.37 1,555.52 2,200.00 644.48 70.71 901-42-2100-402 POLICE..QFFlCElSOFTWARE MTC 25.00 932.50 5,000.00 4,067.50 18.65 901-42-2100-403 POLlCE..QFFICE EQUIP MTC CONT 956.00 1,631.40 5,000.00 3,368.60 32.63 901-42-2100-404 POLICE-VEHICLE REPAIR & MTC 876.85 7,886.67 14,000.00 6,113.33 56.33 901-42-2100-405 POLlCE-EQUIP REPAIR & MTC .00 446.92 1,500.00 1,053.08 29.79 901-42-2100-412 POLICE-BUILDING LEASE 627.25 4,390.75 8,000.00 3,609.25 64.88 901-42-2100-413 POLICE-RENT LEXINGTON 330.00 2,310.00 4,000.00 1,690.00 57.75 901-42-2100-415 POLICE-VEHICLE LEASE .00 41,457.40 51,000.00 9,542.60 81.29 901-42-2100-417 POLICE-EQUIP LEASE AlC RECORDS 37.00 393.36 22,000.00 21,606.64 1.79 901-42-2100-433 POLICE-DUES .00 650.00 790.00 240.00 69.62 901-42-2100-435 POLlCE-SUBSCRlPTlONS & BOOKS .00 205.00 500.00 295.00 41.00 901-42-2100-440 POLlCE-BANKSE~CEFEES 46.43 292.35 500.00 207.65 58.47 901-42-2100-495 MISCELLANEOUS .00 463.48 1,200.00 716.52 40.29 901-42-2100-496 DARE EXPENSES .00 1,403.05 .00 1,403.05 ) .00 MAINTENANCE 2,949.90 63,938.40 115,690.00 51,751.60 55.27 901-42.2100-550 POLICE-VEHICLE SETUP & TRIM .00 .00 3,500.00 3,500.00 .00 901-42-2100-570 EQUIPMENT .00 7,918.32 15,000.00 7,081.68 52.79 CAPITAL OUTlAY .00 7,918.32 18,500.00 10,581.68 42.80 901-42-2100-900 CONTINGENCY FUNDS .00 .00 5,000.00 5,000.00 .00 CONTINGENCY .00 .00 5,000.00 5,000.00 .00 TOTAL POWCE OPERATIONS 125,040.00 914,459.65 1,641,509.00 727,049.35 55.71 TOTAL POWCE GENERAL FUND 125,040.00 ...914,459.65 1,641,509.00 727,049.35 55.71 FOR ADMINISTRATION USE ONLY 58 % OF THE FISCAL YEAR HAS ELAPSED 0810812003 11:04AM PAGE: 2 I if I 07/1612003 CHIEF BECKMAN CENTENNIAL LAKES POLICE DEPAR~ 200 CIVIC HEIGHTS CIRCLE CIRCLE PINES, MN 55014 " D~ <..;HJEJf HECKMAN, THIS LETl'E.K IS TO ADVISE YOU THAT I AM TERMINATING MY EMPLOYMENT WITH THE CENTENNIAL LAKES POLICE"DEPARTMENT EFFECTIVE 07130/2003. IT HAS BEEN A GREAT PLEASURE TO WORK WITH YOU AND EVERYONE ELSE IN THE DEPARTMENT. I WISH YOU THE BEST OF LUCK IN THE FUTURE~ SUBMITTED, ~q, Centennial Lakes Police Department Crime Summary listing Monthly Report for June 2003 Centerville Offense Description 09000 TRAFFIC - ALL OTHER 09001 SPEED 09021 STOP SIGN 09038 MOTORCYCLE VIOLATION 09063 SEAT BELT VIOLATION 09064 CHILD RESTRAINT VIOLATION 09098 FIX IT TICKET 09099 TRAFFIC WARNING 09100 PARKING - ALL OTHER 09101 PARKING - DESIGNATED HOURS 09109 PARKING - NO PARKING ZONE (POSTED) 09140 PARKING - WARNING 09220 DL VIOLATION 09221 DARlDACIDAS 09241 NO PROOF OF INSURANCE 09242 NO INSURANCE 09264 EXPIRED VEHICLE REGISTRATION 09301 LOST - PERSON. 09313 FOUND - PROPERTY 09314 VEHICLES - ABANDONED 09317 VEHICLE - RECOVERED STOLEN (OTHER AGENCY) 09318 FOUND - BICYCLE 09496 ACCIDENT - MV PD - MV & DEER 09561 ANIMAL - DOG BITES 09570 ANIMAL COMPLAINT - ALL OTHERS 09571 ANIMAL COMPLAINT - DOGS 09572 ANIMAL COMPLAINT - DOG BARKING 09573 ANIMAL COMPLAINT - DOG ON LOOSE/NO LEASH 09730 MEDICAL 09801 DOMESTIC 09802 PUBLIC ASSIST 09803 MOTORIST ASSIST 09804 FAMILY ASSIST 09806 NEIGHBORHOOD DISPUTE 09811 LOCK OUT - VEHICLE 09814 LANDLORDrrENANT DISPUTE 09815 CHECK WELFARE 09816 INFORMATION 09818 HOUSE/PROPERTY CHECK 09819 EXTRA PATROL 09820 SUSPICION - ALL OTHER ACTIVITY 09821 SUSPICIOUS - PERSON 09822 SUSPICIOUS - VEHICLE 09825 OPEN DOORlGATE/WINDOW 09827 911 HANG UP 09833 ALARM - BUSINESS 09835 ALARM - RESIDENTIAL 09840 COMPLAINTS - ALL OTHER 09845 COMPLAINTS - MV 09850 ORDINANCE COMPLAINTS - ALL OTHER 09856 OC - SOLICITATION Total 2 6 2 1 1 1 30 64 2 28 3 1 1 6 1, 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 1 1 2 1 2 2 9 2 25 1 1 3 5 1 2 11 7 2 10 2 6 36 2 4 9 6 5 13 2 June 2003 - Centerville 09862 OC - NOISE RESIDENTIAL 098g0 JUVENILE ACTIVITY 09900 MISCELLANEOUS OFFICER 09902 TRAFFIC DETAIL 09910 ASSIST OTHER LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCY 09911 ASSIST OTHER AGENCY (NON LE) 09920 WARRANT ARREST (ADULT) 09922 WARRANT ARREST (ATTEMPT) 09945 COMMUNITY POLICING 09951 PERMIT - TO PURCHASE 09970 FOLLOW UP AL351 DOM ASL T-MS-INFL T BODILY HARM-HANDS-AD-FAM B3364 BURG 3-UNOCC RES FRC-N-UNK WEAP-COM THEFT DC500 DRUGS-DRUG PARAPH-POSSESS-UNK-UNK J2900 TRAFFIC-GM-OTHER ACT-UNK INJ-UNK VEH M4140 LIQUOR-UNDERAGE CONSUMPTION 18-21 M5313 JUVENILE-CURFEW M5350 JUVENILE-RUNAWAY M7399 OTHER-CRIMES AGAINST PUBLIC ORDER N3030 DISTURB PEACE-MS-DISORDERL Y CONDUCT 03601 OBSENITY-MS-INDECENT EXPOSURE-TO MINOR P3110 PROP DAMAGE-MS-PRIVATE-UNK INTENT P3310 TRESPASS-MS-PRIVATE-UNK INTENT TB059 THEFT-MORE 2500-FE- Y ARDS-OTH PROP V0081 VEH-UNKNOWN-MS-TAMPER WITH-ENTER-AUTO W3680 WEAPONS-MS-POSS FIREWORKS-NO CHAR 9 1 1 1 4 5 4 2 1 2 7 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 4 1 1 3 1 Total for Centerville 389 1- ! \ -- City of Centerviae tervir{e ~6{islietf 1857 2004 Proposed Tax Levy Supplemental Narrative August 20, 2003 Cft;J- City of CenterviUe Budget Year 2004 Information Na"ative PODolation Historv Centerville's population has increased by 64% since the year 1993, with the largest increases being in the years 1998 through 2000. Population is steadily inclining; however, the amount of available, buildable land in Centerville is steadily decreasing. Centerville's population will most likely level out after the next few years. Year Population CIly at CentervI1Ie 2,095 PopulatIon ~ 1993 4.oao 1994 2,101 1995 2,173 1996 2,227 3.oao 1997 2,305 2,IIIll 1998 2,476 1999 2,884 ..... 2000 3,202 ..oao 2001 3,245 lllllI 2002 3,331 2003 3,430 'lII3 '994 - ..... .997 ,... ..... 2lIOD .... 2lICl2 2IllI3 Estimated Market Valoe Historv The estimated market value of the real estate in the City ofCenterville has increased 392% since 1993. Similar to population, the trend increased sharply in the year 1998. The upward trend continues; but, again, as the supply of buildable real estate is exhausted, the trend will level out. It will become much more difficult to raise the tax levy as the growth in market value stabilizes and the tax base is no longer broadening. Year 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 EMV 54,282,600 59,975,100 63,533,900 70,702,000 77,429,200 85,907,000 104,730,300 131,591,000 157,941,400 180,650,300 222,692,300 267,230,760 CIly at CenIeNI118 EstImsbJd 6f811tet V8III811111twy 1993 1994 1_ 1998 1897 1898 1999 2GIJ) 2ID1 2D02 2IXI3 211M 1 Net Tax Capacity Ristorv Due to legislative shifts affecting the class rates, the City's net tax capacity (tax base)will not correlate with the growth in estimated market value. Tax burden is shifted between different property classes through legislative adjustments to class percentages. The sharp decrease in tax capacity in the year 2002 was due to the tax relief given to commercial properties. Since the commercial property class is taxed at the highest rate, the reduction in the class percentage created a large decrease in tax capacity. By lowering the commercial property class rate, the Legislature effectively shifted a portion of the tax burden onto other classes of property. After two years, the City has recovered most of the lost tax capacity through growth in the tax base. The amount of adjusted net tax capacity shown for the year 2004 is a preliminary estimate. Year ANTe 1993 847,309 3,IIlID,lIllO 1994 908,734 1995 919,342 2.SlO.CIDD 1996 1,040,532 2.1111.... 1997 1,274,916 1998 1,403,374 1,_ 1999 1,570,777 2000 1,996,117 ,........ 2001 2,455,864 2002 2,071,728 - 2003 2,104,563 2004 2,448,142 Tax Levv Ristorv CtIy of CenI8v/1Je Hat Tu Capadty H1stDIy 1893 1994 19911 19911 1lI97 1S!IIl '899 2lIIl .. 2IIlIa 2Dll3 2llO4 The City's gross tax levy appears to trend upward in correlation with population and market value. The upward trend has not been broken, but has clearly stabilized over the last two budget years. The increase in the year 2004 was necessary in order to recoup a portion of the State aids and credits that were reduced or eliminated for the year 2004. CtIy of CenIJJntO/e Year Levy Lgvy H1stDIy 1993 365,137 '.lID.lIIl 1994 413,600 1.6DD.1III 1995 -434,528 1,4110,1111 1996 509,737 1997 530,995 1.2l1D.... 1998 666,075 ,_ 1999 866,194 800.... 2000 1,095,001 800.... 2001 1,320,028 ........ 2002 1,480,623 2003 1,480,623 ZIl,III1 2004 1,539,330 '893 1994 19911 1S!IIl 1lI97 1998 1899 2lIIl .. ZIl2 ZIl3 2llO4 2 Tax Rate Ristorv For the second consecutive year, Centerville's tax extension rate will decrease. For payable year 2003 the tax rate decreased by 14.6%. The preliminary estimate for payable year 2004 is an additional decrease of 8.7%. This means that the average taxpayer saw a city tax decrease of 14.6% in the year 2003 and the average taxpayer will see an additional 8.6% decrease in the year 2004. For instance, taxpayers would realize the full amount of the decrease if there were no other changes to their property tax equation, such as an increase in market value or a change in classification. Typically, the county does not update the value of every home every year; however, they could. In any event, most taxpayers will see a decrease, in varying amounts, on next year's tax bill. The largest, single factor in this situation is the rapid growth in the tax base. The adjusted net tax capacity in the City of Centerville has increased by 16% over last year. Secondly, the tax levy has increased by less than 4% over the last two years. One small caveat is that the adjusted net tax capacity for taxes payable in 2004 is a preliminary estimate and will change before the end of the year. The adjustment will likely be downward, but the amount should not be substantive. The tax rate last showed a decrease in 1997, when the tax levy remained relatively stable and the net tax capacity increased by 23%. Year 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 Tax Rate 30.208 35.688 35.717 40.194 31.590 40.912 48.862 49.184 49.287 69.466 59.361 54.183 CIty 01 Centetvf//e Tu EJtfensIon Ra19 HlstDry - ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ On the following page, you will find the tax extension rate calculation for taxes payable in the year 2003 and the estimated tax extension rate calculation for taxes payable in the year 2004. Keep in mind that the estimate for the year 2004 is still very preliminary. Since the TIP Captured Value for the year 2004 has not been calculated yet, last year's amount was used as an estimate. It will most likely increase, which will also lower the adjusted net tax capacity. 3 City of Centerville Tax Decrease Final 2003 Budget 2002 Final 2003 Final Tax Rate Tax Rate Tax Capacity 1 ,875,844 2,222,736 TIF Captured Value (8,614) (28,329) AW Contribution (85,180) (89,844) Net Tax Capacity 1,782,050 2,104,563 Certified Levy 1,480,623 (levy limit) 1 ,480,623 Area-Wide Contribution (242,713) (231,329) Local Levy 1,237,910 1,249,294 Local Levy 1 ,237,910 1,249,294 Net Tax Capacity 1,782,050 69.4655% 2,104,563 59.3612% City of Centerville Estimated Tax Decrease Proposed 2004 Budget 2003 Final 2004 Est. Tax Rate Tax Rate Tax Capacity 2,222,736 2,587,813 TIF Captured Value (28,329) (28,329) AW Contribution (89,844 ) (111,342) Net Tax Capacity 2,104,563 2,448,142 Certified Levy 1,480,623 1,539,330 Area-Wide Contribution (231,329) (212,859) Local Levy 1,249,294 1,326,471 Local Levy 1,249,294 1,326,471 Net Tax Capacity 2,104,563 59.3612% 2,448,142 54.1828% 4 Handouts @ meeting II. ,f ." .~. .~". /;"::~..., $14,000 $12,000 $10,000 $8,000 f- $6,000 $4,000 $2,000 0 v ervilfe UPDATE ~ceipts ctl {j)is6ursements .Jlugust 25 tlirougli.Jlugust 27, 2003 Receipts Disbursements $ 11,318.95 $13,809.34 Amount FUND 101 GENERAL FUND Act Type G $200.00 $3.00 $0.50 $4.50 $0.50 $0.50 $0.50 $110.00 $2.00 $0.50 Act $322.00 Act Type R Act $25.00 $20.00 $20.00 $200.97 $90.00 $50.00 $209.30 $156.80 $3,436.04 $60.00 $4.25 $21.00 $4,293.36 FUND $4,615.36 CITY OF CENTERVILLE Cash Receipts AUGUST 25 THRU AUGUST 27, 2003 Tran Date Refer Comments 8/2512003 812512003 8/25/2003 8/2512003 8/25/2003 8/25/2003 8/2512003 8/25/2003 8/2512003 8/27/2003 8/25/2003 8/25/2003 8/2512003 8/25/2003 8/2512003 812512003 8/25/2003 8/25/2003 8/25/2003 8/27/2003 8/27/2003 8/27/2003 Batch Name o 6870 MALLARYWAV - 08-25-03 o 1705 CENTER STREET - 08-25-03 o 6875 MAL1.A.BD WAY - 08-25-03 o 7240 UNITY AVE - 03-150 08-25-03 o 1812 MAIN ST - M03-039 08-25-03 o 1816 PELTIER LAKE DR - 08-25-03 o 1814 MAIN ST - M03-040 08-25-03 o 6870 MALLARY WAY - 08-25-03 o 1680 HERITAGE ST - 08-25-03 o 6936 IVY COURT. C03-068 82703 o 6870 MALLARV WAY - 08-25-03 o 1814 MAIN ST - M03-040 08-25-03 o 1812 MAIN ST - M03-039 08-25-03 o 1680 HERITAGE ST - 08-25-03 o 6875 MALLARD WAY - 08-25-03 o 1816 PELTIER LAKE DR - 08-25-03 o 7240 UNITY AVE - 03-150 08-25:-03 o 1705 CENTER STREET - 08-25-03 o 6870MALLARYWAV- 08-25-03 o 6936 IVY COURT - C03-068 82703 o CAT TAG # 229 82703 o 7264 MOUND COURT 82703 FUND 415 STORM WATER IMP PROJECTS Act Type R $200.00 $27.80 $2.78 $50.16 $5.00 $285.74 Act FUND $285.74 FUND 601 WATER FUND Act Type G Act Act Type R $2.10 $2.10 $0.91 $9.16 $290.00 $1,500.00 $23.93 $239.17 $122.39 $12.24 8/2512003 8/25/2003 8/25/2003 8127/2003 8/27/2003 8/27/2003 8/25/2003 8/25/2003 8/25/2003 8/25/2003 8/25/2003 8/25/2003 8/27/2003 8/27/2003 o 6870 MALlARY WAY - o UB Receipt Serv 10 DRAIN o UB Receipt Serv Pen 10 o UB Receipt Serv 10 DRAIN o UB Receipt Serv Pen 10 08-25-03 8250301 8250301 082703ut 082703ut o UB Receipt Sure 1 SALES 082703ut o UB Receipt Serv Pen 30 8250301 o UB Receipt Serv 30 WATER 82503ut o 6870 MAllARV WAY - 08-25-03 o 6870 MALLARYWAV - 08-25-03 o UB Receipt Serv Pen 1 8250301 o UB Receipt Serv 1 WATER 8250301 o US Receipt Serv 1 WATER 082703ut o UB Receipt Serv Pen 1 082703ut ~ ~i " 08127/03 3:44 p~~r"'r,. Page 1 .:~ \' Account Oeser G 101-24504 Site MaIn. Escrow G 101-24500 Bldg. Permit Surcharge G 101-24501 Plmblng Permit G 101-24500 Bldg. Permit Surcharge G 101-24502 Mach. Permit Sureharge G 101-24503 Elec. Permit Surcharge G 101-24502 Mach. Permit Surcharge G 101-24500 Bldg. Permit Surcharge G 101-24500 Bldg. Permit Surcharge G 101-24503 Elec. Permit Surcharge R 101-32300 Site MaIntenance Fees R 101-32210 Bulldlng/Mech. Permits R 101-32210 Bullding/Mech. Permits R 101-32210 Buildlng/Mech. Permits R 101-32180 Plumbing Permits R 101-32225 Efectricallnspectlon R 101-32210 BulldlnglMech. Permits R 101-32210 Building/Mach. Permits R 101-32210 Bulldlng/Mech. Permits R 101-32225 E1ectricallnspectlon R 101-32200 Animal Ucenses R 101-36100 Special Assessments R 415-34000 Chrgs for Serv. Drain R 415-32350 Storm Water Drainage R 415-32350 Storm Water Drainage R 415-32350 Storm Water Drainage R 415-32350 Storm Water Drainage G 601-20800 State Sales & Use Tax R 601-34400 Safe Drinking Water Fee R 601-34400 Safe Drinking Water Fee R 601-34600 Water Meter Charges R 601-37150 Water R 601-37100 Water Sales R 601-37100 Water Sales R 601-37100 Water Sales R 601-37100 Water Sales / I' V ;) .of ~ Amount Act $2.94 $1.48 $14.72 $29.36 $2,246.30 FUND $2,248.40 FUND 602 SewER FUND Act Type G $1,262.25 Act $1,262.25 Act Type R $2,000.00 $302.03 $30.22 $12.75 $44.55 $4.45 $46.66 $466.54 Act $2,907.20 FUND $4,169.45 $11,318.95 Name CITY OF CENTERVILLE 08/27/033:44 PM Page 2 Cash Receipts AUGUST 25 THRU AUGUST 27, 2003 Tran Date Refer Comments 8/27/2003 8/27/2003 8/2712003 8/27/2003 Batch Name Account Oeser o US Receipt Serv Pen 15 082703ut o US Receipt Serv Pen 30 082703ut o US Receipt Serv 30 WATER 082703ut o US Receipt Serv 15 WATER 082703ut R 601-37100 Water Sales R 601-34400 Safe Drinking Water Fee R 601-34400 Safe Drinking Water Fee R 601-37100 Water Sales 8/25/2003 o 6870 MAUARYWAY- 08-25-03 G 602-20801 Service Availability 8/25/2003 o 6870 MAUARY WAY - 08-25-03 R 602-37250 Sewer 8/25/2003 o US Receipt Serv 6 SEWER 82503ut R 602-37200 Sewer Sales 8/25/2003 o US Receipt Serv Pen 6 82503ut R 602-37200 Sewer Sales 8/25/2003 o 6870 MAUARYWAY- 08-25-03 R 602-34700 SAC Charges 8/27/2003 o US Receipt Serv 18 082703ut R 602-37200 Sewer Sales 8/27/2003 o UB Receipt SeN Pen 18 082703ul R 602-37200 Sewer Sales 8/27/2003 o US Receipt SeN Pen 6 082703ut R 602-37200 Sewer Sales 8/27/2003 o US Receipt SeN 6 SEWER 082703ul R 602-37200 Sewer Sales CITY OF CENTERVILLE 08/27/033:50 PM Page 1 *Check Summary Register@ Check Date AUGUST 2003 Check Amt 10100 MAIN STREET BANK Paid Chk# 018385 AVLIC Paid Chk# 018386 CORNER EXPRESS Paid Chk# 018387 HAWKINS WATER TREATMENT Paid Chk# 018588 IRS/MAIN STREET BANK Paid Chk# 018389 KENNEDY & GRAVEN Paid Chk# 018390 MCLEOD USA . Paid Chk# 018391 MINNESOTA DEPT OF Paid Chk# 018392 NATIONWIDE RETIREMENT Paid Chk# 018393 NCPERS UFE INSURANCE Paid Chk# 018394 PALZER, PAUL Paid Chk# 018395 PUBLIC EMPLOYEES Paid Chk# 018396 aWEST Paid Chk# 018397 STRATEGIC INSIGHTS Paid Chk# 018398 SUPERIOR LAMP & SUPPLY Paid Chk# 018399 TRU GREEN - CHEM LAWN 8/28/2003 8/28/2003 8/28/2003 8/28/2003 8/28/2003 8/28/2003 8/28/2003 8/28/2003 8/28/2003 8/28/2003 8/28/2003 8/28/2003 8/28/2003 8/28/2003 8/28/2003 Total Checks $456.00 DEP COMP - 8-28-03 $198.92 FUEL FOR JULY $1,211.10 CHEMICALS FOR WATER $3,830.25 FED WIH PAYROLL 8-28-03 $3,037.22 GEN OBLI. TEMP IMPR. BONDS, SE $730.34 SERV THRU 8-15-03 $612.99 PAYROLL WIH 8-28-03 $729.00 DEP COMP WIH 8-28-03 $64.00 E. PAULSETH & T BENDER INS. $18.00 MILEAGE FOR SLDG CODE SEMINAR $1,730.37 PAYROLL WIH 8-28-03 $272.35 651-429-4969 SERV THRU8-15-G3 $399.38 CAPITAL PLANNING SOFTWARE $253.17 LIGHTS - P.W. $266.25 LAWN CARE $13,809.34