HomeMy WebLinkAbout2012-10-10 CC Packet CITY OF CENTERVILLE COUNCIL MEETING &
WORKSESSION AGENDA
tervitte Wednesday, October 10, 2012
Established Iasi 6:30 p.m. or shortly thereafter w/Work Session following Regular
Meeting
OPEN FORUM 6:30 p.m.: An opportunity for members of the public to address the City Council on items not on
the current agenda. Items requiring Council action may be deferred to staff or Boards and Commissions for
research and future Council Agendas if appropriate. You will be limited to two (2) minutes and we ask that you
conduct yourself in a professional, courteous manner, and refrain from the use of profanity. Failure to abide by this
policy may result in the loss of your privilege to speak. Persons wishing to speak will be required to complete a
sign -up sheet and give it to the Mayor or a Staff person by 6:15 p.m.
COUNCIL MEETING
CALL TO ORDER
1. Roll Call
II. PUBLIC HEARING(S)
III. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
IV. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
1. September 26, 2012 City Council Meeting Minutes (Pages 1 -6)
2. September 26, 2012 City Council Closed Executive Session Minutes
V. CONSENT AGENDA
1. City of Centerville September 27, 2012 through October 10, 2012 Claims
(Check #27501- 27526) (Pages 7 -8)
2. Centennial Police Department Claims through September 27, 2012 (Check
#9118 -9137) (Page 9)
3. Centennial Fire District Claims through September 21, 2012 (Check #5514-
5538) w /Check #5508 -5513 Payroll (Page 10)
4. Planning & Zoning Commission Recommendation to Approval a
Conditional Use Permit to Miller Mobile Marine, LLC, 6995 — 20 Avenue
South (Pages 11 -14)
5. Res. #12 -XX — Committing Fund Balances for Specific Purposes — (Pages
15 -16)
VI. AWARDS /PRESENTATIONS /APPEARANCES
VII. OLD BUSINESS
1. None
VIII. NEW BUSINESS
1. Approval f h
of the SWMP (Pages 17-57)
2. Ord. #XX, Second Series — Amending City Code, Chapter 156, Section
156.006 Definitions & 156.016- 156.052 Zoning Districts (Pages 58 -76)
3. Ord. #XX, Second Series — Amending City Code, Chapter 72, Regulating
Use of Snowmobiles (Pages 77 -84)
4. Centerville Road /CSAH21 — Design Issues
5. Appointment to Fill Building Inspector /P.W. Maintenance Technician
Position
IX. ANNOUNCEMENTS/UPDATES
1. City Administrator Larson
X. CLOSED EXECUTIVE SESSION
1. Purchase /Sale of Real Estate
XI. WORK SESSION
1. 2013 Street Improvement Project
2. Social Host Ordinance (City Attorney) (Pages 1 -3)
3. Ord. #XX, Second Series — Fee Schedule for 2013 (Pages 4 -19)
XII. ADJOURNMENT
*REMINDERS **
In- Person Absentee Voting — September 21 — November 5, 2012 City Hall
Centerville Lions Haunted House — October 19, 20 & 26 & 27, 2012, 5:00 p.m. — 11:00 p.m. @
LaMotte Park Warming House, 6970 LaMotte Drive — PENDING APPROVAL
City Council Meeting — October 24, 2012, 6:30 p.m. Council Chambers
General Election — November 6, 2012, 7:00 a.m. — 8:00 p.m. — St. Gen's Community Center,
6995 Centerville Road
Parks & Recreation Committee Meeting — November 7, 2012, 6:30 p.m. @ Hidden Spring Park
Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting — November 13, 2012, 6:30 p.m. Council Chambers
City Council Meeting — November 14, 2012, 6:30 p.m. Council Chambers
CITY OF CENTERVILLE
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
September 26, 2012
6:30 p.m.
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, the City of Centerville held their regularly
scheduled meeting of September 26, 2012, at City Hall, 1880 Main Street.
PRESENT: Mayor Tom Wilharber
Council Member Ben Fehrenbacher
Council Member Steve King Q (}
Council Member D. Love
[op_
Council Member Jeff Paar
ABSENT: None
STAFF: City Administrator Dallas Larson
City Engineer Mark Statz
Legal Counsel Kurt Glaser
I. CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Wilharber called the meeting to order at 6:30 p.m.
_ I
II. PUBLIC HEARING(S)
None.
III. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
Mayor Wilharber reviewed the addition of page 9a with added Check #27496 - 27500.
Mayor Wilharber stated that Ms. Debra Barnes, The Citizen, requested to be added Under
Appearances.
Motion by Council Member Love, seconded by Council Member Paar to approve
the Set Agenda with the noted additions. All in favor. Motion passed unanimously.
IV. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
1. September 26, 2012 City Council Meeting & Work Session Meeting Minutes
1
City of Centerville
Council Meeting Minutes
September 26, 2012
Mayor Wilharber requested that language contained in the first paragraph of the City
Administrator's Update be modified to clarify that the Indian burial grounds were located
on the same parcel.
Motion by Council Member Fehrenbacher, seconded by Council Member King, to
approve the September 26, 2012 City Council Meeting & Work Session Meeting
Minutes as amended. All in favor. Motion passed unanimously.
V. CONSENT AGENDA
1. City of Centerville September 13, 2012 through September 26, 2012 Claims
(Check #27431- 27470) & (Check #27496 - 27500)
2. Centennial Police Department Claims through September 13, 2012 (Check #9098-
9117)
3. Centennial Fire District Claims through September 7, 2012 (Check #5481 -5507)
w /Check #5453 -5457 Payroll
4. Encroachment Agreement — 7185 Brian Drive — Fence
5. Centerville Lions Annual Haunted House — Special Event Permit
Motion by Council Member Paar, seconded by Council Member King, to approve
the Consent Agenda as presented. All in favor. Motion passed unanimously.
VI. AWARDS /PRESENTATIONS /APPEARANCES
1. Mr. Hal Leibel, Anoka County Commissioner Jim Kordiak and Mr. John
VonDeLinde, Director of Anoka County Parks — Proposed Sale of Parcel by
Leibel to Anoka County Parks
Commissioner Jim Kordiak introduced himself to Council and stated that the reason he is
present this evening is that he serves in the capacity of the Chair of the County's Parks &
Recreation Committee. Commissioner Kordiak stated that it has been a long desire of the
County's to have the ability to have a facility in the southeastern quadrant of the County
that would enable storage of equipment, building supplies and allow for light equipment
repair and that Mr. Leibel's existing building and property would be a suitable site.
Mr. Kordiak explained that the County would be utilizing grant dollars from the Clean
Water Legacy Fund to purchase the property which they felt was more cost effective than
the alternative of constructing a new building within the Regional Park.
Park Director VonDeLinde stated that the County understood that the City would be
losing tax base if the property became public property which is tax exempt; however, the
County was willing to provide the City with assurances to protection of the Indian Burial
mound(s); landscaping of the lot which would include walkways, a garden area, bike
Page 2 of 6
2
City of Centerville
Council Meeting Minutes
September 26, 2012
racks and seating area; paving of the driveway and parking area; provide identification
signage; granting a permanent easement to the City for a welcome sign; sweeping of the
Regional Parks trails through LaMotte Park and along CSAH14; maintain grass along
Centerville Lake and CSAH14 trail along with a one -time payment of 1.8 times the
City's portion of the property taxes for one year (Appox. $1,400).
Mr. Leibel stated that he felt that this was an opportunity to sell his property to the
County who would ensure protection of the Indian Burial Mounds and esthetic
improvements to the parcel being an entrance property to the City.
Concerns were expressed by Council members that the property would go tax exempt.
Council Member Fehrenbacher stated that while the $1,400 tax loss appears small, if
calculated as a ratio to the City budget and then using that same percentage against the
county budget, it would be equivalent to a loss of about $225,000, to the County. He
suggested that the net present value of the loss of this income to the City would be about
$50,000.
Consensus of Council was that the things being offered by the County to offset the City
losses was insufficient. It was agreed to continue discussions to find additional items of
consideration for the sale of the property due to the loss of tax base.
2. Deb Barnes, Managing Editor, Citizen Newspaper
Ms. Barnes stated that Press Publications would be offering space in its newspaper to
select communities called The Lowdown. The Citizen will be offering a new section
within the paper providing news and viewpoints for Centerville. Ms. Barnes stated that
additional information about this offering and its cost would be forthcoming.
Ms. Barnes stated that currently, the City does not communicate with the public through
this media except for publications of legal notices and that it is an offering that the City
may desire to consider.
Mayor Wilharber stated that he had received information regarding the new offerings and
would provide it to Staff for possible use in the future.
Ms. Barnes stated that this may be a great avenue for the City to let residents know about
road construction, plowing priorities, etc.
VII. OLD BUSINESS
None.
Page 3 of 6
3
City of Centerville
Council Meeting Minutes
September 26, 2012
VIII. NEW BUSINESS
1. Approve Agreement with TASC for Assistance with Administering Flexible
Benefit Plan — (Substitute for prior administrator AFLAC)
Administrator Larson stated that the City has a number of benefit offerings for Staff
including short-term and long -term disability, health insurance, a health savings plan,
daycare, etc. In order to maintain pretax treatment of these benefit offerings, the city
needs to carefully manage them in compliance with IRS requirements. Administrator
Larson explained that the City previously had a flex -plan with AFLAC who administered
the program; however, currently no employees are subscribing to their services and
AFLAC will no longer provide the services to the City. Administrator Larson stated that
TASC would administer a flex -plan for a monthly administration fee of $30 which was
minimal.
Motion by Council Member Paar, seconded by Council Member Love to approve
the Agreement with TASC for Assistance with Administering Flexible Benefit Plan.
All in favor. Motion passed unanimously.
2. Approval of Contract with Union Local 49, Public Works Employees
Administrator Larson stated that negotiations with Local 49 representing public works
employees has been ongoing for approximately eight (8) months and with recent
mediation discussions an agreement has been reached. Administrator Larson stated that
it was critical to reach an agreement prior to filling the vacancy for the Building
Inspector /P.W. Technician position. Administrator Larson reviewed the contract
modifications with Council stating that he understood that Council had offered certain
amounts in certain categories but in an attempt to get this issue resolved he offered the
following: a one time payment in October, 2012 for $450 rather than $500, an increase in
boot allowance of $30 rather than $25 for years 2013 & 2014 and an increase in uniform
allowance of $50 rather than $0 for the years 2013 & 2014. Administrator Larson stated
that the above stated items would be in addition to previously authorized contract
changes.
Consensus of the Council was that minimal changes had been made and Staff could
commence filling the current vacancy with a contract in place.
Motion by Council Member Love, seconded by Council Member Fehrenbacher to
approve the Contract with Union Local 49, Public Works Employees for 2012, 2013
& 2014 as presented. All in favor. Motion passed unanimously.
IX. ANNOUNCEMENTS/UPDATES
Page 4 of 6
4
City of Centerville
Council Meeting Minutes
September 26, 2012
1. City Administrator Larson
a. Liquor License Renewal Has Started
Administrator Larson stated that annual licensing has commenced for liquor, tobacco and
massage establishments /providers.
Administrator Larson suggested that Council consider scheduling a work session
following the regular council meeting of October 10, 2012 to discuss the open house that
would be held on October 3, 2012, feasibility report, cost allocations and assessments
associated with the 2013 Street Improvement Project and the draft 2013 Fee Schedule.
Engineer Statz reported that the final pay request associated with the trail project had
been forwarded to the contractor who has a supplemental claim but with Mr. Burmeister
being out of the office the consideration by the City has been delayed.
Engineer Statz also reported that the completed Surface Water Management Plan had
been completed and would be place on Council next agenda for consideration.
Administrator Larson stated that all Council Members would be receiving a copy for
review shortly.
Engineer Statz stated that he and several members from Staff had met with Anoka
County regarding the impending road reconstruction of CSAH21 /Centerville Road.
Engineer Statz stated that acquiring easements from abutting property owners has slowed
the process.
Lengthy discussion ensued regarding the County's funding for the project, trail
construction, proposed construction of park land by neighboring community, pedestrian
safety, turn lanes and cost sharing for Centerville and Lino Lakes. Administrator Larson
stated that an open house would be held in January for impacted residents and the City.
Administrator Larson stated that the property cleanup for the downtown resident had
commenced the previous day and that the property owners were cooperative.
Administrator Larson stated that he would update Council at their next meeting regarding
the issue.
Council Member King stated that the Parks & Recreation Committee would be meeting
on October 3, 2012 and that the regular meeting for North Metro Telecommunication
Commission had been cancelled.
Council Member Fehrenbacher reported that a Collaboration Meeting between the six (6)
cities would be taking place the following evening.
Page 5 of 6
5
City of Centerville
Council Meeting Minutes
September 26, 2012
Closed meeting to discuss purchase and /or sale of real estate. The Mayor stated that
Council would be taking a 5 minute recess at 7:39 p.m. and then begin their Closed
Executive Session. It was noted that when the meeting is reopened to the public, it is
possible that some action could be taken by the Council.
The council reopened the meeting to the public at 8:15 p.m.
It was noted that the only issue discussed during the closed portion of the meeting were,
real estate purchase and sale matters regarding the industrial development proposal.
The motion made by Council member Paar, seconded by Council member
Fehrenbacher to adjourn at 8:15 p.m. Motion passed unanimously.
Transcribed by Staff member Teresa Bender, City Clerk
Page 6 of 6
6
CITY OF CENTERVILLE 10/05/12 12:08 PP
Page
Check Detail - OCTOBER 10, 2012
Check
Date Check # Vender Name Comments Amount
10/5/2012 000349E MASTERCARD -CITY OF CENTERVILLE SPRINGSTED SYMPOSIUM - M. JEZIORSKI $125.00
10/5/2012 000349E MASTERCARD -CITY OF CENTERVILLE AWWA MEMBERSHIP DUES $74.00
10/5/2012 000349E MASTERCARD -CITY OF CENTERVILLE POSTAGE $9.95
10/5/2012 000349E MASTERCARD -CITY OF CENTERVILLE SUPPLIES $22.99
10/5/2012 000349E MASTERCARD -CITY OF CENTERVILLE FUEL $61.71
10/5/2012 000349E MASTERCARD -CITY OF CENTERVILLE P.PALZER - RENEWAL CERTIFICATION & CCLD FALL SEM. $155.00
10/5/2012 000349E MASTERCARD -CITY OF CENTERVILLE OPERATING SUPPLIES $760.46
10/5/2012 000349E MASTERCARD -CITY OF CENTERVILLE FUEL $858.72
10/5/2012 000349E MASTERCARD -CITY OF CENTERVILLE BOBCAT REPAIR $1,188.39
10/5/2012 000349E MASTERCARD -CITY OF CENTERVILLE SIGNS & SIGN POSTS $508.96
10/5/2012 000349E MASTERCARD -CITY OF CENTERVILLE SALT BRINE TRAINING - LUNCH 44 PARTICIPANTS $385.37
10/5/2012 000349E MASTERCARD -CITY OF CENTERVILLE SUPPLIES $38.74
10/5/2012 000349E MASTERCARD -CITY OF CENTERVILLE SUPPLIES $412.81
Check Nbr 000349 MASTERCARD -CITY OF CENTERVILLE $4,602.10
10/10/2012 027501 ANOKA COUNTY PROPERTY RECORDS 510291.010 - 7163 BRIAN DR
Check Nbr 027501 ANOKA COUNTY PROPERTY RECORDS $46.00
10/10/2012 027502 BRANCH, PATRICK REIMBURSEMENT FOR T- SHIRTS FOR 8KRUN /WALK
Check Nbr 027502 BRANCH, PATRICK $23.75
10/10/2012 027503 CENTENNIAL FIRE DISTRICT STATE FIRE AID
Check Nbr 027503 CENTENNIAL FIRE DISTRICT $105,001.18
10/10/2012 027504 CENTENNIAL LAKES POLICE DEPT POLICE SERVICES - OCTOBER
Check Nbr 027504 CENTENNIAL LAKES POLICE DEPT $55,083.99
10/10/2012 027505 CENTER POINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 1880 MAIN ST - SERV THRU 9 -24 -12 $29.71
10/10/2012 027505 CENTER POINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 1785 PELTIER LAKE DR - SERV THRU 9 -24 -12 $14.54
10/10/2012 027505 CENTER POINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 7087 -20TH AVE - SERV THRU 9 -24 -12 $12.85
10/10/2012 027505 CENTER POINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 6970 LAMOTTE DR - SERV THRU 9- 24 - +12 $16.23
10/10/2012 027505 CENTER POINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 2085 W CEDAR ST - SERV THRU 9 -24 -12 $46.07
Nbr 027505 CENTER POINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO $119.40
10/10/2012 027506 CITY OF CIRCLE PINES 10 -2012 POLICE BUILDING PYMT $4,229.17
10/10/2012 027506 CITY OF CIRCLE PINES 10 -2012 POLICE BUILDING PYMT $1,912.57
Check Nbr 027506 CITY OF CIRCLE PINES $6,141.74
10/10/2012 027507 COCHRAN, VANESSA REFUND DEPOSIT FOR LAMATTE PARK PICNIC SHELTER $100.00
Check Nbr 027507 COCHRAN, VANESSA $100.00
10/10/2012 027508 CONNEXUS ENERGY 6800 20TH AVE FOR SCADA - SERV THRU 9 -20 -12 $6.49
10/10/2012 027508 CONNEXUS ENERGY 2085 CEDAR ST - SERV THRU 9 -17 -12 $518.96
10/10/2012 027508 CONNEXUS ENERGY 6800 20TH AVE FOR SCADA - SERV THRU 9 -20 -12 $6.49
10/10/2012 027508 CONNEXUS ENERGY 7100 20TH AVE N - TRAFFSG - SERV THRU 9 -19 -12 $38.67
10/10/2012 027508 CONNEXUS ENERGY 6900 20TH AVE LIFT STATION - SERV THRU 9 -17 -12 $62.23
10/10/2012 027508 CONNEXUS ENERGY 7087 20TH AVE N - SERV THRU 9 -17 -12 $59.50
10/10/2012 027508 CONNEXUS ENERGY STREET LIGHTS - 695653 - 219699 - SERV THRU 9 -27 -12 $112.94
10/10/2012 027508 CONNEXUS ENERGY STREET LIGHTS - 395653 - 219678 - SERV THRU 9 -27 -12 $115.15
Check Nbr 027508 CONNEXUS ENERGY $920.43
10/10/2012 027509 FILMCO INDUSTRIES SALT BRINE EQUIPMENT - LEXINGTON
Check Nbr 027509 FILMCO INDUSTRIES $1,052.33
10/10/2012 027510 GOETZ LANDSCAPE & IRRIG. PARKS - SERV THRU 9 -2012 $1,193.04
10/10/2012 027510 GOETZ LANDSCAPE & IRRIG. WATER TOWER SITE SERV HTRU 9 -2012 $28.64
Check Nbr 027510 GOETZ LANDSCAPE & IRRIG. $1,221.68
10/10/2012 027511 GOPHER STATE ONE CALL INC SERV THRU 9 -2012 $28.28
10/10/2012 027511 GOPHER STATE ONE CALL INC SERV THRU 9 -2012 $28.27
Check Nbr 027511 GOPHER STATE ONE CALL INC $56.55
10/10/2012 027512 HAWKINS WATER TREATMENT CHEMICALS
Check Nbr 027512 HAWKINS WATER TREATMENT $1,125.12
10/10/2012 027513 HEALTH PARTNERS OCT. 2012 HEALTH INS.
Check Nbr 027513 HEALTH PARTNERS $4,757.21
10/10/2012 027514 IIMC T. BENDER MEMBERSHIP DUES
Check Nbr 027514 IIMC $145.00
10/10/2012 027515 INSTRUMENTAL RESEARCH INC SEPT. 2012 WATER TESTING
Nbr 027515 INSTRUMENTAL RESEARCH INC $38.00
10/10/2012 027516 IRRIGATION BY DESIGN, INC. SERVICE REPAIRS
Check Nbr 027516 IRRIGATION BY DESIGN, INC. $150.30
7
CITY OF CENTERVILLE 10/05/12 12:08 Pf
Page
Check Detail - OCTOBER 10, 2012
Check
Date Check # Vender Name Comments Amount
10/10/2012 027517 ISS SYSTEM MOMITORING - 1880 MAIN ST
Check Nbr 027517 ISS $111.04
10/10/2012 027518 JOHN GLASER SPECIAL ASSESS REFUND - 23 31 22 31 0013 - 1777 CENTER
Check Nbr 027518 JOHN GLASER $1,165.65
10/10/2012 027519 LARSON, DALLAS MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENTS $38.30
10/10/2012 027519 LARSON, DALLAS MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENTS $164.94
Check Nbr 027519 LARSON, DALLAS $203.24
10/10/2012 027520 OLSON SEWER SERVICE, INC. EXCAVATION WORK BY 1753 CENTER ST
Check Nbr 027520 OLSON SEWER SERVICE, INC. $5,927.63
10/10/2012 027521 PORTA -POT LAMOTTE PARK - SERV THRU 9 -12 $112.27
10/10/2012 027521 PORTA -POT TRACIE MCBRIDE PARK - SERV THRU 9 -2012 $112.27
Check Nbr 027521 PORTA -POT $224.54
10/10/2012 027522 POSTMASTER 3RD QTR UTILTIY BILL - POSTAGE $166.55
10/10/2012 027522 POSTMASTER 3RD QTR UTILTIY BILL - POSTAGE $166.55
10/10/2012 027522 POSTMASTER 3RD QTR UTILTIY BILL - POSTAGE $166.54
Check Nbr 027522 POSTMASTER $499.64
10/10/2012 027523 PRESS PUBLICATIONS PUBLIC HEARING P& Z $55.85
Check Nbr 027523 PRESS PUBLICATIONS $55.85
10/10/2012 027524 SMITH & GLASER, LLC PROSECUTION - SERV THRU 4 -2012 $4,868.00
10/10/2012 027524 SMITH & GLASER, LLC PROSECUTION - SERV THRU 6 -2012 $4,719.50
10/10/2012 027524 SMITH & GLASER, LLC GENERAL CIVIL - SERV THRU 6 -2012 $552.50
10/10/2012 027524 SMITH & GLASER, LLC 7047 -21ST AVE - SHEEHY CONST - SERV THRU 6 -2012 $212.50
10/10/2012 027524 SMITH & GLASER, LLC PROSECUTION - SERV THUR 5 -2012 $3,959.50
10/10/2012 027524 SMITH & GLASER, LLC 7047 21ST AVE - SHEEHY CONST. - SERV THRU 5 -2012 $344.00
10/10/2012 027524 SMITH & GLASER, LLC GENERAL - SERV THRU 4 -2012 $1,565.00
10/10/2012 027524 SMITH & GLASER, LLC GENERAL CIVIL - SERV THRU 5 -2012 $1,681.50
Check Nbr 027524 SMITH & GLASER, LLC $17,90 c"
10/10/2012 027525 STANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES IN GENERAL - SERV THRU 9 -2012 $1,4
10/10/2012 027525 STANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES IN 2013 STREET RECONSTRUCTION - SERV THRU 9 -2012 $4,0
10/10/2012 027525 STANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES IN 2012 SWMP UPDATE - SERV THRU 9 -2012 $729.00
Check Nbr 027525 STANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES IN $6.281.20
10/10/2012 027526 WELLS FARGO SPECIAL ASSESS REFUND - 23 31 22 31 0013 - 1777 CENTER
Check Nbr 027526 WELLS FARGO $1,942.75
TOTAL CHECKS $214,898.82
8
CENTENNIAL LAKES POLICE DEPT Check Register - Police GL without invoice numbers Page: 1
Check Issue Dates: 9/14/2012 - 9/27/2012 Sep 27, 2012 02:02PM
Report Criteria:
Report type: Summary
GL Check Ck No Description Check
Period Issue Date Payee Amount
09/12 09/25/2012 9118 DELTA DENTAL OCT DENTAL 1,092.30 M
09/12 09/27/2012 9119 ANOKA COUNTY AUG INTERNET ACCESS 338.26
09/12 09/27/2012 9120 ASPEN MILLS, INC UNFORMS 609.06
09/12 09/27/2012 9121 CONNEXUS ENERGY AUG ELECTRIC 2,371.73
09/12 09/27/2012 9122 EMERGENCY AUTO TECH ,INC VEH SETUP 2013 INTERCEPTOR SED 5,198.47
09/12 09/27/2012 9123 HEALTH PARTNERS OCT HEALTH INS 7,748.20
09/12 09/27/2012 9124 IMAGE PRINTING & GRAPHICS, INC EVIDENCE REPORTS 179.89
09/12 09/27/2012 9125 LOFFLER FUSER 52.49
09/12 09/27/2012 9126 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS CELL PHONE SERVICE 471.73
09/12 09/27/2012 9127 NEAL A. NOREN BLDG MTC HOURS 165.00
09/12 09/27/2012 9128 PETTY CASH /CSO HATTSTROM POSTAGE 50.92
09/12 09/27/2012 9129 PITNEY BOWES POSTAGE METER RENTAL 73.77
09/12 09/27/2012 9130 PURCHASE POWER POSTAGE 207.99
09/12 09/27/2012 9131 QUILL CORPORATION INK CARTRIDGES /PAPER 192.77
09/12 09/27/2012 9132 CITY OF ST PAUL TRAINING MG 40.00
09/12 09/27/2012 9133 SHRED -N -GO, INC SHREDDING SERVICE 34.00
09/12 09/27/2012 9134 STREICHER'S, INC SAFETY VEST 1,070.00
09/12 09/27/2012 9135 SUMMIT FIRE PROTECTION FIRE SPRINKLER INSPECTION 260.00
09/12 09/27/2012 9136 SUN LIFE FINANCIAL OCT LIFE /DISABILITY 96.80
09/12 09/27/2012 9137 U S BANK QUARTERLY HSA PMT 10,787.50
Grand Totals: 31,040.88
M = Manual Check, V = Void Check
9
CENTENNIAL FIRE DISTRICT Check Register - FIRE GL Page: 1
Check Issue Dates: 9/8/2012 - 9/21/2012 Sep 21, 2012 02:48PM
Report Criteria:
Report type: Summary
GL Check Check Vendor Description Check
Period Issue Date Number Number Payee Amount
09/12 09/21/2012 5514 11565 ASPEN MILLS, INC UNIFORM 172.85
09/12 09/21/2012 5515 20353 BLAINE BROTHERS, INC A21 REPAIR & MTC 1,202.15
09/12 09/21/2012 5516 20365 JACOB BOND EMT TESTING REIMB 70.00
09/12 09/21/2012 5517 30480 CENTENNIAL UTILITIES AUG STATION 1 UTILITIES 146.28
09/12 09/21/2012 5518 30485 CENTER MART FUEL 321.22
09/12 09/21/2012 5519 30500 CENTURY LINK CENTERVILLE PHONE 56.54
09/12 09/21/2012 5520 31008 COMCAST INTERNET STATION 1 101.50
09/12 09/21/2012 5521 31137 CONNEXUS ENERGY ELECTRIC STATION 1 494.02
09/12 09/21/2012 5522 60300 FIRE SAFETY USA, INC HELMET SHEILDS 416.83
09/12 09/21/2012 5523 60650 FRATTALLONE'S HARDWARE S VEH SUPPLIES 97.90
09/12 09/21/2012 5524 60700 FRIENDLY CHEVROLET, INC R11 MTC 371.95
09/12 09/21/2012 5525 70578 GRAINGER VEHICLE PART /MTC 233.61
09/12 09/21/2012 5526 80350 HENNEPIN TECHNICAL COLLE TRAINING TRAILER RENTAL 570.00
09/12 09/21/2012 5527 120450 CITY OF LINO LAKES AUGUST REIMBURSEMENTS 34,139.71
09/12 09/21/2012 5528 120490 LOFFLER COMPANIES, INC COPIER MTC CONTRACT 275.83
09/12 09/21/2012 5529 131470 MUNICIPAL EMERGENCY SERV BOOTS 1,011.70
09/12 09/21/2012 5530 160150 PEARSON EDUCATION, INC EMS ONLINE CLASS NON -EMP 31.33
09/12 09/21/2012 5531 160493 PREMIUM WATERS, INC BOTTLED WATER 23.69
09/12 09/21/2012 5532 180060 BRADLEY C RACUTT INSTRUCTOR HIRING MEETING 30.00
09/12 09/21/2012 5533 190825 KEVIN STEWART FUEL REIMB 20.01
09/12 09/21 /2012 5534 200150 THOMAS MOTORS, INC C3 VEH BRAKE WORK 450.96
09/12 09/21/2012 5535 210232 UNI- SELECT R21 ALTERNATOR 126.18
09/12 09/21/2012 5536 220200 VERIZON WIRELESS CELL PHONES 164.37
09/12 09/21/2012 5537 220250 VIKING TROPHIES, INC AWARDS 36.00
09/12 09/21/2012 5538 240100 XCEL ENERGY ELECTRIC STATION 2 580.53
Grand Totals: 41,145.16
Check #5508 - 5513 Payroll
M = Manual Check, V = Void Check
10
Planning & Zoning Commission Report and Recommendation.
The Planning & Zoning Commission met on October 2, 2012, to consider a request of
Miller Mobile Marine, LLC and property owner Will Lesard, for a Conditional Use
Permit (CUP) to operate a marine equipment sales, repair and storage business at 6995
20 Avenue South, City of Centerville.
Findings:
1) The Planning and Zoning Commission heard and considered all testimony of
interested persons submitted in writing prior to and in person during the public
hearing.
2) The proposed use may be operated in the B -1 zoning district subject to a Conditional
Use Permit with reasonable conditions.
3) The proposed use is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan.
4) The applicant is willing to conform to conditions in the draft Conditional Use Permit
attached hereto.
RECOMMENDATION.
The Planning Commission finds that the standards for granting a Conditional Use Permit
have been met and recommends that the City Council approve the Conditional Use
Permit, subject to the conditions contained in the draft CUP attached hereto.
October 2 2012
Planning and Zoning Commission
Dallas Larson, Administrator
1 1
ANOKA COUNTY, MINNESOTA
APPROVAL OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
1. Permit. Subject to the terms and conditions set forth herein, the City of Centerville
hereby grants approval of a conditional use permit for:
Miller Mobile Marine, LLC and property owner Will Lesard to operate a marine
equipment sales, repair and storage business at 6995 20 Avenue South and
subject the conditions of this permit.
2. Property. The permit is for the following described property:
Outlot A, Center Villa
3. Conditions. This permit is issued subject to the following conditions:
a) Applicant shall maintain an 8 foot privacy fence and screening as shown on the
attached site plan in accordance with City Code Section 154.060 D.
b) Marine equipment and trailers shall be stored only within buildings and within the
fenced storage area.
c) Bulk gasoline or other fuels shall not be stored on site and there shall be no
exterior storage of containers of lubricants or other chemicals.
d) Limits on the noise shall conform to the noise regulations contained in City Code
Section 91.09 and other nuisance regulations contained in Chapter 91.
e) Testing of gasoline engines and other noise producing equipment shall be limited
to the hours of 7:30 a.m. to 7:00 p.m., Monday through Saturday.
f) Landowner and the business operator shall not park vehicles and equipment on
the public trail that crosses the property and shall operate the business in a way
that protects the safety of trail users.
g) Landowner and the business operator shall jointly and individually be responsible
for the continuing conformance with the permit and that if the proposed use is not
initiated within six months of this date, the permit shall be void.
i) Grantee will follow the applicable standards and requirements of the City of
Centerville, Rice Creek Watershed District, Anoka County, Army Corp of
Engineers, FEMA, Minnesota DNR and any other agency having jurisdiction over
the property and shall secure and file with the City, any permits required by
outside agencies.
j) The City reserves the right to annually review this permit for compliance with the
conditions and may impose additional conditions to mitigate unforeseen
problems.
4. Criminal Penalty. Violation of the terms of this permit is a criminal misdemeanor.
2
12
Dated:
• CITY OF CENTERVILLE
BY:
Tom Wilharber, Mayor
Attest:
Teresa Bender, City Clerk
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
) ss.
COUNTY OF ANOKA )
The foregoing was acknowledged before me this day of , 2012.
by Tom Wilharber, Mayor and Teresa Bender, Clerk of the City of Centerville, a
Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to authority
granted by its City Council.
III
Notary Public
III
3
13
- .
, . .
.-.
- ....
, • .
•
' . .
;
I - ='•r . - . $$
) .
1 I. -
. .,...
• .
i eaav ua:.-
.. ...._ .
, .
. . .., , •
. .. '
. • .4. ' : ' r a
■
...,• .- . ..
II
• 1:1''' .... .
, t , •
41.1 1
t 1 i... ''• ' ' I
,
-,.. .
i .
. ,
I
- VIC . is-
-
•
. . .
. . ,
.• .. i . , .'; ,
■
•;-- • •
. .
•
•
t • ^ ..
• . . ,
- t
41. '‘? way a .
t ' •• V. . IP.'
' - -• .•
III ' • ‘ . 1 i
. I
-...
•
-i=•• , , , - k,01111111#1111111111*•' .
' .
• „ .
• t
' . , . ; . ... .......... - . ,
, ...
' -- - -*
.. . ' . - L t ., • "
1. .
$ '
..,
. a • , ;$.•
. ....„. I - 0 .
.. , .
I 4 •.
• , .
: . ..
, • .
, -
i ".. ' "' '. , ''''''-'''• ' : '• '.'st- ' -'-' ' I
. ,
I a •
....— . - -. . .
1
, .• r. .
5
• -
. 7 ,
/ .
. • .:•• .
g ....,
...
. ,
•
.t
•
. .,
. ,
' - ' ' '' '''''''''''' ' ..4 - - '' • ' ' '; : -:- ''' ''''' - '''. '' ---,.'" - '- . '-'.' r, • , . -, ' ' --'' • --.::-'' , ,,- ' • ' - , - - • '?".,',..---- -
_ : , •*.r-o'
' . ' - -.• '". • , .t ..- • *. 17 • '.-..., ,l - • .=-'*•,,,, -,-. : .... ' •
.,...., " , .
•.- -, ''. '44.4,... - - ? .. .$ ... '''' '''' ' ' A.''': ' ''''k."-- i' , ,.1`...- '..•.'4.''''' ' '.. ‘' . ,„.•,. ,;,,,,,- _ -
- , i : ...-.,' • ''' : 74 .1 tr r ;.`in, , • e ,-, _ .,' t , r - ' ,', . .:, .• . T. 40:-.. . . ... , , .
.' -',. ,_. -* , -• •, . .
• ' 1,
. , - ..' . - - . ,-;),,,.., ` .1,,' A ■!: A : • , : t.: . ',- '7S- _ :VI . r- i .",.,, „,.. •,,. ., 44,, .;,,A , - .... , - -• .. - . ,..
' ' ' ..:t. •
- r .. r : ,, _ ,.,* .. , r,.......1, i .„.• s 1, 4 ,1::,,:f4. , , ,tir. , •:V . 7 ,; ,..: •, P a ...n.i."3 '.';,'`''''. ' '.7.1 110Ir 1111111111r:i. ' ''
Res. #12 -0
A RESOLUTION COMMITTING FUND BALANCES FOR SPECIFIC PURPOSES
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Centerville, Minnesota, does hereby find as follows:
WHEREAS, the Governmental Accounting Standards Board's Statement No. 54 defines committed
fund balance as amounts that can only be used for specific purposes pursuant to constraints imposed by
formal action of the Council,
WHEREAS, Council action is required before year end to formalize the commitment of fund balance
to specified purposes,
WHEREAS, those committed amounts cannot be used for any other purpose unless the City removes
or changes the specified use by taking the same type of action it employed to previously commit those
amounts.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY PROCLAIMED by the City, that the specific portions of fund
balance in the identified funds are committed as follows:
Committed
EWA ihistielka UMW ANEW
General Park and Recreation Volleyball Court $18,755.00
Adopted by the City Council of Centerville, Minnesota this 10th day of October, 2012.
Tom Wilharber, Mayor
Attest:
Teresa Bender, Clerk
15
Summary of Fund Balances
Fund
balance at
Fund # Fund Name 9/30/12 Designation Amount Restricting at 12/31/11 (Resolution 11-023) Recommended Action Restricting at 12/31/12
101 General Fund 749,537.06 Committed 2,500.00 Park and Rec - Volleyball Court (Deadbroke) None Park and Rec - Volleyball Court (Deadbroke)
Committed 2,037.71 Park and Rec - 2011 8K Run proceeds Convert commitment to Volleyball Court Park and Rec - Volleyball Court (2011 8K Run Proceeds)
Committed 1,585.53 Park and Rec - Signs Convert commitment to Volleyball Court Park and Rec - Volleyball Court
Committed 250.00 N/A Commit 2012 Centennial Youth Hockey Donation to VC Park and Rec - Volleyball Court (Centennial Youth Hockey)
Committed 5,000.00 N/A Commit 2012 Deadbroke Donation to Volleyball Court Park and Rec - Volleyball Court (Deadbroke)
Committed 1,000.00 N/A Commit Excess from 2012 101 - 452101 -370 to VC Park and Rec - Volleyball Court
Committed 1,381.82 N/A Commit 2012 8K Run Profits to Volleyball Court Park and Rec - Volleyball Court (2012 8K Run Proceeds)
Committed 5,000.00 N/A Commit 5K from Working Capital to Volleyball Court Park and Rec - Volleyball Court
Committed 714.08 Park and Rec - Concession Operation Convert to working capital Working Capital
Unassigned 730,067.92 Working Capital
Total 749,537.06 'Total of $18,755.06 committed to the construction of
a single Volleyball court during 2013
CD
r
Centerville Surface Water
Manageme Plan
Cit of Centerville
September 2012
Approved October 10, 2012 by Rice Creek Watershed District
Pro Num ber 193802237
One Team. Infinite Solutions. Stantec
17
Stantec
CENTERVILLE SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN
Table of Contents
1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1.1
2.0 INTRODUCTION 2.3
2.1 AUTHORIZATION 2.3
2.2 PURPOSE OF THE PLAN 2.3
3.0 PHYSICAL ENVIRONMENT 3.4
3.1 GENERAL LOCATION 3.4
3.2 GEOLOGY AND TOPOGRAPHY 3.4
3.3 SOIL CHARACTERISTICS 3.4
3.4 CLIMATE 3.5
3.5 LAKES AND OTHER SIGNIFICANT WATERBODIES 3.5
3.6 WETLANDS 3.5
3.7 LAND USE 3.6
3.8 UTILITY SYSTEMS 3.7
3.9 UNIQUE AREAS 3.7
3.10ZONING AND FLOODPLAIN MANAGEMENT 3.7
3.11 GROUNDWATER CHARACTERISTICS 3.8
4.0 HYDROLOGIC CALCULATIONS /MODELING PARAMETERS 4.9
4.1 WATER QUANTITY 4.9
4.2 NURP STANDARDS 4.9
5.0 WATER RESOURCE MANAGEMENT OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES 5.10
5.1 BACKGROUND 5.10
5.2 OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES 5.10
6.0 WATER RESOURCE MANAGEMENT PLAN 6.14
6.1 STORM WATER MANAGEMENT AND MAINTENANCE 6.14
6.2 SUPPORT OF RCWD PROGRAMS AND EXISTING AGREEMENTS 6.15
6.3 PHASE 11 NPDES MS4 PERMIT AND SWPPP 6.15
6.4 TOTAL MAXIMUM DAILY LOAD (TMDL) STUDIES 6.16
6.5 STORM WATER RUNOFF RATE CONTROL 6.16
6.6 MANAGEMENT OF CLEARWATER CREEK DITCH SYSTEM 6.16
6.7 INTERCOMMUNITY FLOWS 6.16
6.8 EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL 6.17
6.9 WETLAND MANAGEMENT 6.18
6.10FLOODPLAIN ADMINISTRATION 6.18
6.11SHORELAND REGULATION 6.18
6.12PUBLIC PARTICIPATION 6.19
One Team. Infinite Solutions.
18
Stantec
CENTERVILLE SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN
Table of Contents
7.0 IMPLEMENTATION PROGRAM 7.20
7.1 ADMINISTRATION RESPONSIBILITY AND IMPROVEMENT PLAN 7.20
7.2 FINANCING OF MANAGEMENT PROGRAMS 7.20
7.3 PUBLIC PARTICIPATION THROUGH INFORMATION AND EDUCATION 7.21
7.4 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN SUMMARY 7.21
8.0 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN 8.22
8.1 INTRODUCTION 8.22
9.0 STORM WATER CHARGES 9.25
10.0AMENDMENT PROCESS 10.27
APPENDIX
FIGURE 1 Location Map
FIGURE 2 USGS Topographic Map
FIGURE 3 NRCS Soils Map
FIGURE 4 Wetland Inventory Map
FIGURE 5 MLCCS Land Cover Map
FIGURE 6 Existing Land Use Plan
FIGURE 7 2030 Future Land Use Plan
FIGURE 8 Zoning Map
FIGURE 9 Floodplain Map
FIGURE 10 Storm Sewer & Drainage Basin Map
FIGURE 11 Capital Improvement Plan Map
City Code Chapter 157: Erosion Control
City Code Chapter 155: Flood Damage Prevention
City Code Section 156.133: Special Provisions Related to Development or Building on Lands
within 100 Feet of Centerville Lake, Peltier Lake or Clearwater Creek
ii
19
Stantec
CENTERVILLE SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN
1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The City of Centerville, located within the Rice Creek Watershed District (RCWD), is a rapidly
growing community of 2.6 square miles. Currently, about 80% of the City is developed. Although
complete development in the comprehensive plan is proposed to be staged over the next 20
years, development pressure will likely result in the rapid development of the remainder of the
City.
Because of the impending development that will occur in Centerville, the management priorities
of the City have focused on issues surrounding development, such as installation of proper
detention facilities, erosion and sediment control of new construction sites, providing adequate
storm sewer capacity, and meeting water quality requirements.
The RCWD has in the past regulated new developments occurring in Centerville through the
District's permit program. However, at this time, the City recognizes that several issues
surrounding new development and water resource management are best implemented by the
City, as the local entity with the most to gain or lose with several of these issues.
Below is a summary of all the chapters contained in this report:
2.0 INTRODUCTION — Includes information about authorization and discusses the purpose
of the plan.
3.0 PHYSICAL ENVIRONMENT — Contains information about location, geology,
topography, soils, climate, waterbodies, land use, utility systems, and unique areas.
4.0 HYDROLOGIC CALCULATIONS /MODELING PARAMETERS — Discusses the required
parameters to be used in calculations and /or modeling done to determine compliance with storm
water runoff rate controls or NURP pond guidelines.
5.0 WATER RESOURCE MANAGEMENT OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES — Includes a
description of all the objectives and associated policies to be adopted as part of the surface
water management plan.
6.0 WATER RESOURCE MANAGEMENT PLAN — Provides specific information as to the
proposed management method and framework to meet the objectives and policies outlined in
Chapter 5.
7.0 IMPLEMENTATION PROGRAM — Provides information as to the practical method for
implementing the programs discussed in Chapter 6.
8.0 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN — Describes capital improvement projects involving
the storm sewer system and provides cost estimates for each.
One Team.Infinite Solutions.
1.1
20
Stantec
CENTERVILLE SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
September 2012
9.0 STORM WATER CHARGES — Summarizes the current storm water fee structure.
10.0 AMENDMENT PROCESS — Describes the procedures involved in updating the plan
using amendments.
One Team. Infinite Solutions.
1.2
21
Stantec
CENTERVILLE SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN
INTRODUCTION
September 2012
2.0 INTRODUCTION
2.1 AUTHORIZATION
On February 8, 2012, the Centerville City Council authorized the preparation of a surface water
management plan (SWMP) update. This SWMP will be used as a framework to manage the
water resources within the City of Centerville. The SWMP is consistent with the Comprehensive
Plan Update for the City of Centerville as well as the Watershed Management Plan and rules of
the Rice Creek Watershed District.
2.2 PURPOSE OF THE PLAN
The City of Centerville is located within the Rice Creek Watershed District (RCWD). The RCWD,
under the authority of Minnesota state statutes, requires municipalities to prepare local surface
water management plans. This plan will satisfy the requirements of the RCWD and Minnesota
state statutes.
The RCWD has been active in the preparation of watershed plans, review of new
developments, and management of water resources. The City is required to submit a Local
Surface Water Management Plan to the Watershed District within two years of approval of the
district plan from the Board of Water and Soil Resources (BWSR).
All communities in the seven county metropolitan area are required to have a Local Surface
Water Management Plan. The Watershed Districts and Watershed Management Organizations
are responsible for preparation of a Watershed Management Plan. The goals and policies of the
RCWD were incorporated into this plan.
The intent of the legislated statute is to give the responsibility for water management to the local
units of government. The State and the Metropolitan Council have only minimal oversight roles
in watershed management or plan implementation.
The Centerville SWMP has been prepared to comply with Minnesota state statutes and with the
RCWD plan. The intent of this plan is to define policies and implementation procedures in order
to meet the goal of adequate management of water resources within the City.
One Team. Infinite Solutions.
2.3
22
Stantec
CENTERVILLE SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN
PHYSICAL ENVIRONMENT
September 2012
3.0 PHYSICAL ENVIRONMENT
3.1 GENERAL LOCATION
The City of Centerville is situated in the southeast region of Anoka County, Minnesota. Figure 1
illustrates where the City is situated within the Twin Cities seven county metro area. The City is
adjacent to Centerville Lake and Peltier Lake and is surrounded by the City of Lino Lakes.
3.2 GEOLOGY AND TOPOGRAPHY
The City is located in the northern portion of the Rice Creek Watershed District. The land is
generally flat with major drainageways and creeks discharging into Peltier and Centerville
Lakes. The ground elevation in the City ranges from approximately 912 feet to 886 feet NGVD,
with the lowest areas located near the lakes. The USGS topographic map for the area is
provided in Figure 2.
3.3 SOIL CHARACTERISTICS
The NRCS Soil Survey of Anoka County indicates that soils in the area are mostly of the
Nessei- Dundas- Webster association — nearly level to gently sloping, moderately well drained
and poorly drained soils formed in loamy glacial till. The water table is noted as seasonally high
in most of the soil types listed for this area. The soil survey shows several divisions of soil types
within the City.
The Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) has established a series of soil groups
based on infiltration rates of the soil:
HYDROLOGIC SOIL GROUP A - Low runoff potential, high infiltration rate
HYDROLOGIC SOIL GROUP B - Moderate infiltration rate
HYDROLOGIC SOIL GROUP C - Slow infiltration rate
HYDROLOGIC SOIL GROUP D - Very slow infiltration rate, high runoff potential
The runoff potential of an area is determined using these general soil characteristics in
combination with land use classification, vegetation of the area, and rainfall intensities as
determined from various design storms. As illustrated in Figure 3, the City contains a wide
geographic variability of hydrologic soil groups, with the majority of the City being in the B and C
categories.
One Team. Infinite Solutions.
3.4
23
Stantec
CENTERVILLE SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN
PHYSICAL ENVIRONMENT
September 2012
3.4 CLIMATE
Centerville has a climate that is fairly uniform. Summers are warm, with a mean temperature of
67.6 degrees in June, July, and August. Winters are cold, having a mean December, January,
and February temperature of 13.3 degrees. About 75% of the precipitation occurs in the period
of April through September. The yearly precipitation total is 28.7 inches.
3.5 LAKES AND OTHER SIGNIFICANT WATERBODIES
There are several waterbodies in the City. Peltier Lake and Centerville Lake are both located
partially within the City and mostly in Lino Lakes. Clearwater Creek (Anoka - Washington Judicial
Ditch 3) flows west and then north through the City to Peltier Lake. Anoka County Ditch 55
flows southwesterly through the City to Clearwater Creek. A private ditch flows northeasterly
through the City to Clearwater Creek.
Peltier Lake has a surface area of approximately 579 acres with a maximum depth of 18 feet.
Water quality data has been recorded for some parameters since 1974.
Centerville Lake is approximately 474 acres in surface area with a maximum depth of
approximately 19 feet. Water quality data on Centerville Lake has been recorded since 1980.
Centerville Lake has regional use for fishing and boating.
As shown in Table 3.1, there are two Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (MnDNR)
Protected Waters in the City. These include a portion of Centerville Lake, designated as
02000600, and a portion of Peltier Lake, designated as 02000400. Also included under MnDNR
jurisdiction are three protected wetlands as discussed in the next section.
Table 3.1 MnDNR Protected Waters Within the City of Centerville
Qualifying Waters MnDNR Designation OHW
Centerville Lake 02000600 885.0
Peltier Lake 02000400 884.7
3.6 WETLANDS
Wetlands in the City are derived from the National Wetlands Inventory (USFWS, 1991) and
shown in Figure 4. Wetlands are a significant portion of the natural features found in the City.
Table 3.2 lists the MnDNR Public Waters Wetlands located within the City. Figure 4 shows the
location and boundaries of the Public Waters Wetlands, which are obtained from the MnDNR
Data Deli website: http: / /deli.dnr.state.mn.us /.
One Team. Infinite Solutions. 3.5
24
Stantec
CENTERVILLE SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN
PHYSICAL ENVIRONMENT
September 2012
Table 3.2 MnDNR Public Waters Wetlands within the City of Centerville
Qualifying Waters MnDNR Designation
Wetland — Northeast corner of City 545W
Wetland — Across 14 from Centerville Lake 546W
Wetland — Southwest corner of City 554W
It is essential to note that these boundaries are only approximate and do not replace a wetland
delineation. The MnDNR, RCWD, and the US Army Corps of Engineers should be contacted if
work in or near wetlands is anticipated. Any construction activity that may impact wetlands may
require permits from the RCWD, the US Army Corps of Engineers, and /or MnDNR.
Correspondence regarding any wetland impacts should be directed to the following:
MN Dept. of Natural Resources US Army Corps of Engineers
Kate Drewry, Area Hydrologist Andy Beaudet
1200 Warner Road St. Paul District, 180 5th Street E., Suite 700
St. Paul, MN 55106 St. Paul, MN 55101 -1678
(651) 259 -5753 (651) 290 -5642
Rice Creek Watershed District
Nick Tomczik, Permit Coordinator
4325 Pheasant Ridge Drive NE, Suite 611
Blaine, MN 55449
(763) 398 -3079
3.7 LAND USE
Figure 5 illustrates land cover within the City, based on the MnDNR's Minnesota Land Cover
Classification System (MLCCS). The City is predominantly a residential community. Changes in
land use are anticipated in the future as construction of high and medium density or single
family residential development continues. The City's comprehensive plan lays out these
proposed areas for development or redevelopment. Of note is the City's plan to redevelop the
downtown area with a mixed use (retail and high density housing) style project. Figure 6 shows
existing land use within the City. Figure 7 shows 2030 future land use within the City. These
figures are taken directly from Figures 8 and 15, respectively, of the Centerville 2030
Comprehensive Plan.
Roofs, driveways, parking lots, and other impervious surfaces increase the amount of surface
water runoff due to a decrease in the amount of soil infiltration associated with an area.
Consequently, as development increases or other changes in land use occur, more runoff can
be discharged into the drainage system if the percentage of impervious surfaces increases.
One Team. Infinite Solutions. 3.6
25
Stantec
CENTERVILLE SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN
PHYSICAL ENVIRONMENT
September 2012
There are a few small areas that are expected to develop as residential in the future, particularly
in the southern portion of the City. Additionally, the City has constructed an industrial park in
the east central part of the city which will most likely build out in the near future.
3.8 UTILITY SYSTEMS
The public utilities within the City include the storm sewer, sanitary sewer, and water system.
The Metropolitan Council Environmental Service (MCES) public sanitary sewer system services
all of the developed part of the City. There are a few scattered acreage style lots (11) which
remain on Individual Sewage Treatment Systems (ISTS). Proposed maintenance and inspection
of these systems is addressed in Chapter 6. City code requires connection to the municipal
system with any redevelopment proposal.
The water distribution system now services a majority of the developed part of the community.
The remaining neighborhoods are scheduled for connection to City water when their streets are
in need of major repair. These neighborhoods include: Center Oaks 2, Royal Meadows, and
portions of the downtown area. Scattered lots in neighborhoods served by City water remain
unconnected along Peltier Lake Drive, MiII Road, and Brian Drive. There are approximately
1,096 water connections to the watermain system as of April, 2012, which includes residential
as well as commercial, industrial, and institutional. The remainder of the City is serviced by
private wells, which totals approximately 255, down from 360 in 2004. These numbers were
compiled from City utility billing records. The water system for the City of Centerville includes
one water tower, two wells, and a controlled interconnection with the City of Lino Lake's system.
The surface water drainage system includes street gutters, storm sewers, culverts, swales,
channels, marshes, ponds, lakes, etc. Recent development in the City has incorporated the
natural drainage patterns of the land whenever possible. However, since the area is very flat,
detention ponds were created in many developments to control runoff.
3.9 UNIQUE AREAS
The Rice Creek Area Chain of Lakes Park Reserve is located in the northwest corner of the
City. Accounting for approximately 10% of the area of the City, 149 of the 2,500 acres of the
park are located within Centerville city limits. The park has many recreational facilities including
picnic areas, boat launches, canoe launches, fishing piers, campgrounds, a nature center, a
heritage lab, a prairie restoration project, cross country ski trails, a swimming beach, a
playground, and a golf course. The Metropolitan Council's classification as a regional park
requires that 80% of the park remain in its natural state.
3.10 ZONING AND FLOODPLAIN MANAGEMENT
As part of the comprehensive planning process, the City adopted a Future Land Use Plan
(Figure 7). By law, the City is required to change zoning to match the Future Land Use Plan
within one year of the adoption of the Comprehensive Plan. The City has now adopted the new
Zoning Map. This means that the Future Land Use Map (Figure 7) and the Official Zoning Map
One Team. Infinite Solutions.
3.7
26
Stantec
CENTERVILLE SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN
PHYSICAL ENVIRONMENT
September 2012
(Figure 8) are now one and the same. This is not to say that the Official Zoning Map reflects the
existing land use. The Existing Land Use Map is shown in Figure 6. Figures 6 and 7 are taken
directly from the Centerville 2030 Comprehensive Plan; Figure 8 is the recently adopted Official
Zoning Map. There is no current plan to further alter zoning within the City. The zoning
ordinance now classifies land use into eleven categories: Rural Residential (R1), High- Density
Single - Family Residential (R2A), Single - Family Residential (R2), High- Density Multi - Family
Residential (R3), Single - Family Manufactured Housing (R4), Single Family Residential- Estate
(R5), Commercial (B1), Industrial Park (11), Public /Institutional (P1), Mixed Use (M1), Mixed Use
Neighborhood District (M2). The zoning ordinance also regulates shoreland activities.
Figure 9 delineates the approximate floodplain and floodway boundaries within the City. The
City initiated the Floodplain Reduction Project along Clearwater Creek in 1989. This project
involved the investment of significant resources to reduce flooding potential along Clearwater
Creek. Following completion of the project, a Clearwater Creek flood study was conducted and
a Letter of Map Revision (LOMR) was subsequently approved by the Federal Emergency
Management Agency (FEMA) in October 1997. As a result, the Flood Insurance Study (FIS),
Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM), and the Flood Boundary and Floodway Map (FBFM) for the
City were revised. These references should be consulted for more complete and detailed
information on the floodplain and floodway areas. The current FEMA map is dated June 2,
1999.
The Federal Emergency Management Administration has recently acquired more accurate,
digitized mapping data and has sent copies of a revised FIRM to cities for review. Centerville
submitted several comments regarding areas which have been excluded from the floodplain via
LOMA -Fs and other methods. However the resubmitted map did not show these areas out of
the floodplain. This map approval process is still in progress at the time of this report.
3.11 GROUNDWATER CHARACTERISTICS
Information on the City's geologic and groundwater characteristics, including geologic features,
groundwater sensitivity, groundwater discharge and recharge areas, and the influence of land
use on groundwater can be found in the City's Wellhead Protection Plan, adopted in December
2007. A copy of this plan can be obtained at City Hall. The plan contains information which the
City views as security- sensitive, in an effort to protect their drinking water sources. Therefore,
the plan is not available on the Internet, nor should it be attached to this document which will be
available to the public.
One Team. Infinite Solutions.
3.8
27
Stantec
CENTERVILLE SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN
HYDROLOGIC CALCULATIONS /MODELING PARAMETERS
September 2012
4.0 HYDROLOGIC CALCULATIONS /MODELING PARAMETERS
4.1 WATER QUANTITY
As stated in Chapter 6, rate control must be provided within each development that maintains
existing runoff conditions for the 2 -year, 10 -year, and 100 -year storm events. For each
proposed development, supporting calculations or modeling must be submitted. The
calculations or modeling shall be based on NRCS methods. The parameters for the calculations
or modeling shall be as follows:
• NRCS 24 -HOUR Type II design storms based on Technical Paper 40 from the U.S.
Weather Bureau:
1 -year storm = 2.4"
10 -year storm = 4.2"
100 -year storm = 5.9"
• Assume Antecedent Moisture Condition II (AMC II)
• For the purpose of determining existing runoff conditions for land currently used for
agriculture, curve numbers (CN values) shall be based on pre - agricultural condition with
a mixture of pasture, brush, and woods. The CN value for this land shall be 58.
• Other CN values shall be based on NRCS standards (Table 2 -2a, Technical Release
55, "Urban Hydrology for Small Watersheds ", NRCS, June, 1986)
4.2 NURP STANDARDS
The design storm for determining compliance with Nationwide Urban Runoff Program (NURP)
standards for storm water ponds shall be 2.5 inches. See Chapter 6 for additional details.
One Team. Infinite Solutions.
4.9
28
Stantec
CENTERVILLE SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN
WATER RESOURCE MANAGEMENT OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES
September 2012
5.0 WATER RESOURCE MANAGEMENT OBJECTIVES AND
POLICIES
5.1 BACKGROUND
The City of Centerville has adopted several water resource management objectives, which
provide a framework to guide development of policies and management programs.
According to Minnesota Rules Chapter 8410, the development of objectives and policies must,
at a minimum, address the following issues: Water Quantity, Water Quality, Recreation, Fish
and Wildlife, Enhancement of Public Participation through Information and Education, Public
Ditch Systems, Groundwater, Wetlands, and Erosion.
The RCWD Watershed Management Plan is based on the following guiding principles:
• Demonstrate measurable success by solving problems and implementing solutions
• Explore a range of ideas and opportunities and projects to ensure healthy water resources
for the Rice Creek Watershed
• Balance the complex interrelated dynamics of resource management
• Enlist the public and cities as partners in resource management
• Operate in a fiscally efficient manner based on providing "best value" and accountability
• Implement and construct innovative projects to solve problems
• Make decisions in the best interest of the entire area comprising the Rice Creek Watershed
5.2 OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES
The City has adopted the following objectives and associated policies to be adopted as part of
the SWMP:
Objective 1
Reduce to the greatest extent possible erosion and sediment deposition from new
construction sites into natural water resources within the City.
The City experienced significant development in the early to mid- 2000s. While development has
slowed considerably the past several years due to the economic downturn, it is likely to pick up
again in the future. While it may not reach the level of the "boom years ", development could
continue in the City for a number of years into the future.
To meet this objective, the City will implement a local program of erosion and sediment control
that would be administered in addition to the RCWD permit and inspection program. The City
One Team. Infinite Solutions. 5.10
29
Stantec
CENTERVILLE SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN
WATER RESOURCE MANAGEMENT OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES
September 2012
realizes that RCWD efforts in this area are limited by manpower and budget constraints, and
understands that erosion and sediment control can be better enforced at a more local level.
Related Policies
(a) Continue enforcing the City code addressing erosion control for all new development
occurring in the City (see appendix)
Objective 2
Minimize potential damage from flooding of personal and public property.
Flooding damages have long been a concern in the City due to the numerous wetland areas
and the Clearwater Creek Ditch System. Moreover, flooding problems have resulted from the
difficulty associated with maintaining proper drainage over the flat topography of the area.
The City has been proactive in reducing flooding potential to local residents. For example, in
1989, the City initiated the Floodplain Reduction Project along Clearwater Creek. This project
involved the investment of significant resources to reduce flooding potential along Clearwater
Creek. It was completed in 1994, with final approval from FEMA of the revised flood profile
occurring in 1996.
Related Policies
(a) Continue enforcing the City code addressing floodplain management for all new
development occurring in the City (see appendix)
(b) Continue policy of reviewing new grading plans for potential flooding problems.
(c) Implement the capital improvement projects described in Chapter 8. It is anticipated that
these projects will help reduce flooding potential at several problem areas within the
City.
(d) Cooperate with the RCWD in administering infiltration standards. The City defers to the
goals and policies of the RCWD regarding infiltration.
One Team. Infinite Solutions. 5.11
30
Stantet
CENTERVILLE SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN
WATER RESOURCE MANAGEMENT OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES
September 2012
Objective 3
Protect and improve the water quality of the Clearwater Creek Ditch System, Peltier Lake,
and Centerville Lake.
All new developments within the City are now required to provide some type of pretreatment of
storm water such as ponding or infiltration basins. This policy has been in place since the mid -
1990s. Consequently, the City now maintains over 100 such features. Through recent street
reconstruction projects, the City and county have addressed the few remaining areas where
storm water was discharged directly into Clearwater Creek with no treatment. These locations
included two low points along Peltier Lake Drive, a low point on Brian Drive south of Main
Street, and the low point at the Main Street culvert crossing. All of these locations now have
some means of pretreatment.
Direct discharge of storm water to Centerville Lake is still present from the downtown area.
However, the city has constructed the first phase of a storm water reclamation project, aimed at
eliminating this discharge as the downtown redevelops. This project was completed with
cooperation from the RCWD.
Related Policies
(a) Work toward the implementation of policies, programs, and projects to achieve the
requirements of the Peltier Lake and Centerville Lake TMDL Implementation Plan, when
it is finalized and approved.
(b) Support the RCWD Water Quality BMP Cost -Share Program. This is a dedicated cost -
share grant program to assist property owners with the implementation of Best
Management Practices (BMPs) aimed at improving the quality of surface waters within
the watershed.
(c) Initiate more frequent sweeping at direct discharge points along Peltier Lake Drive and
Brian Drive, and coordinate with Anoka County for more frequent sweeping along Main
Street.
(d) Cooperate with the RCWD in administering infiltration standards. The City defers to the
goals and policies of the RCWD regarding infiltration.
(e) Identify retrofit opportunities in subwatersheds where water quality treatment standards
are not being met.
Objective 4
Maintain the integrity of the storm water collection system.
Related Policies
One Team. Infinite Solutions.
5.12
31
Stantec
CENTERVILLE SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN
WATER RESOURCE MANAGEMENT OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES
September 2012
(a) Develop a systematic approach to maintenance of storm water ponds and ditches.
(b) Adjust the storm water utility fee as appropriate to best utilize funds for the maintenance
and capital improvements program.
Objective 5
Protect recreation, fish, and wildlife resources.
The City is located in a very unique area surrounded by lakes, creeks, beaches, and parks.
Realizing the value of these resources, the City desires to be a part of the preservation of these
valuable resources.
Related Policies
(a) Continue enforcing the City code addressing shoreland activities (see appendix).
(b) Support efforts of the MnDNR, the RCWD, and the Lake Homeowners Association in
managing Centerville and Peltier Lakes.
Objective 6
Increase public participation through information and education.
The City currently distributes information to all residents through the City's website. This website
provides an excellent forum for distributing information on water resource - related issues and
developments to the public. Through this website, the City increases public awareness about
water resource management through the use of regular features to be included on the website.
Additionally, the City's website provides links to information on websites of other agencies
including the RCWD and BWSR.
One Team. Infinite Solutions. 5.13
32
Stantec
CENTERVILLE SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN
WATER RESOURCE MANAGEMENT PLAN
September 2012
6.0 WATER RESOURCE MANAGEMENT PLAN
This chapter of the plan provides specific information as to the proposed management
framework and methods to meet the water resource management objectives and policies
outlined in Chapter 5. The storm sewer and drainage basin map for the City is presented in
Figure 8.
6.1 STORM WATER MANAGEMENT AND MAINTENANCE
The City experienced significant development in the early to mid- 2000s. While development has
slowed considerably the past several years due to the economic downturn, it is likely to pick up
again in the future. It is anticipated that development could continue in the City for a number of
years into the future until near ultimate population and growth is achieved.
Storm water improvements are a requirement of City Code Chapter 157 for new developments.
Most new storm sewer constructed in the City will be funded by developers, either directly or
through a bonding and assessment process.
In accordance with the RCWD Watershed Management Plan and in an effort to protect
downstream waters, the City requires that all new developments provide for treatment of storm
water discharge. RCWD rules call for infiltration and /or retention of runoff from the 2.8 -inch
storm event for new development. For redevelopment, the rules call for infiltration and /or
retention of runoff from the 0.8 -inch event.
If infiltration is infeasible due to soils that do not support infiltration, documented soil
contamination, or a high groundwater tables, then alternative storm water BMPs are required.
The RCWD's stated order of preference for these BMPs is biofiltration (e.g., rain gardens),
filtration, wetland treatment systems, extended detention basins, and NURP ponding.
The RCWD requires protective easements for all storm water detention facilities and
conveyance structures. These easements are intended to protect floodplain and storm water
storage areas from alterations that may interfere with storage and /or flow of surface water,
particularly during flood conditions. They also serve as formal notice to the property owners and
future property owners that the and within the easements may be inundated at any future date.
Maintenance of storm water facilities will be coordinated with the RCWD. Currently, inspections
are performed in the spring and fall, with maintenance done as needed. Maintenance of the
current system will continue to be a priority for the City. As new development occurs, developers
will "turn over these new storm water facilities to the City Public Works Department, including
trunk and lateral storm sewers, catch basins, storm water BMPs, and ponds and outlet
structures. With such a relatively new storm sewer system, there are currently few maintenance
tasks other than street sweeping, which is done a minimum of once per year. However, the City
plans to formulate a Maintenance Plan Budget within 5 years.
One Team. Infinite Solutions. 6.14
33
Stantec
CENTERVILLE SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN
WATER RESOURCE MANAGEMENT PLAN
September 2012
City staff will inspect ponds in accordance with the requirements of the NPDES MS4 Permit.
This Permit is currently in the process of being finalized by the MPCA.
Potential capital improvement projects are described in Chapter 8, Capital Improvements Plan.
These projects should aid in addressing maintenance concerns within their respective areas.
As described in Section 3.8, Utility Systems, eleven residences remain on Individual Sewage
Treatment Systems (ISTS). The City will work closely with the County to inspect these systems
and assure that they are operated properly.
6.2 SUPPORT OF RCWD PROGRAMS AND EXISTING AGREEMENTS
The City recognizes the benefit of a governmental entity such as the RCWD for purposes of
water resource management. An agency such as the RCWD can best handle sensitive
intercommunity issues such as water and drainage rights and management. As a result, the City
will continue to support and coordinate with the RCWD on all water resource management
issues, and it recognizes the role of the RCWD to continue to administer all water resource
permitting and regulation responsibilities within the City.
The City presently has existing agreements with the City of Lino Lakes and the RCWD. The
RCWD is responsible for maintenance of the Clearwater Creek Ditch System within the City.
The City also cooperates with the City of Lino Lakes under a Joint Powers Agreement with
street sweeping and rock hauling efforts. There are no other known existing agreements with
the City of Lino Lakes, RCWD, or private parties.
6.3 PHASE II NPDES MS4 PERMIT AND SWPPP
The MPCA is the permitting authority in Minnesota for the National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System (NPDES). Under this system, the City is considered a municipal separate
storm sewer system (MS4) community and must obtain a Phase 11 NPDES MS4 Permit. Under
the provisions of its MS4 Permit, the City has developed and implemented a Storm Water
Pollution Prevention Program (SWPPP).
The SWPPP addresses six minimum control measures:
1. Public education
2. Public involvement
3. Illicit discharge detection and elimination
4. Construction site runoff control
5. Post - construction runoff control
6. Pollution prevention in municipal operations
The City has identified best management practices (BMPs) and measurable goals associated
with each minimum control measure. An annual report on the implementation of the SWPPP is
One Team. Infinite Solutions.
6.15
34
Stantec
CENTERVILLE SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN
WATER RESOURCE MANAGEMENT PLAN
September 2012
prepared and submitted to the MPCA each year. Details of the City's SWPPP are available on
it website.
6.4 TOTAL MAXIMUM DAILY LOAD (TMDL) STUDIES
TMDL studies are underway for Centerville Lake and Peltier Lake and for the Lino Lakes Chain
of Lakes. Draft reports have been prepared for both TMDLs, but neither has been approved by
the USEPA nor have Implementation Plans been prepared.
Peltier Lake and Centerville Lake have been listed by the MPCA as impaired for nutrients, with
phosphorus identified as the main pollutant causing the impairment. The TMDL report calls for
a 46% reduction in total phosphorus loading for Peltier Lake and a 0% reduction for Centerville.
The assumption is that phosphorus reductions to Peltier Lake will benefit Centerville Lake as
well. There is no specific reduction identified for the City; instead, the TMDL report calls for a
"categorical reduction" of 46% that would need to be met by the contributing watershed as a
whole. Specific implementation strategies affecting Centerville include implementing RCWD
rules and meeting the requirements of the 2007 Environmental Assessment Worksheet
prepared for the City's Downtown Development.
The Lino Lakes Chain of Lakes are impaired for nutrients, again with phosphorus identified as
the main pollutant. The TMDL report calls for no load reduction from MS4 communities within
the watershed. Instead, internal loading and outflow from Peltier Lake are identified as the
primary phosphorus sources. Meeting the load reduction requirement in the Peltier Lake TMDL
is considered essential to meeting the Lino Lakes Chain of Lakes water quality goals.
6.5 STORM WATER RUNOFF RATE CONTROL
In an effort to prevent flooding associated with increased runoff rates from new developments,
rate control must be provided within each development that maintains existing runoff conditions
(or less) for the 2 -year, 10 -year, and 100 -year storm events.
6.6 MANAGEMENT OF CLEARWATER CREEK DITCH SYSTEM
The Clearwater Creek Ditch System can be considered a "trunk storm sewer" for the entire City.
Most runoff is routed either directly or indirectly to Clearwater Creek. Therefore, the
management of this system is extremely important to the City. The system will be managed in
accordance with the rate control and water quality policies outlined in Sections 6.1 and 6.5.
6.7 INTERCOMMUNITY FLOWS
The City is bounded on all sides by the City of Lino Lakes. Any flows leaving Centerville
therefore enter Lino Lakes. The majority of the City drains to Peltier Lake, either directly or via
Clearwater Creek. A portion of the City drains to Centerville Lake, which then drains to Peltier
Lake. A small area in the northwestern portion of the City drains directly to Lino Lakes. The
One Team. Infinite Solutions. 6.16
35
Stantec
CENTERVILLE SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN
WATER RESOURCE MANAGEMENT PLAN
September 2012
Rice Creek Watershed District identifies the intercommunity flows from Centerville to Lino
Lakes, via Clearwater Creek (Anoka - Washington Judicial Ditch 3) as:
• 2 -year, 24 -hour rainfall peak flow: 195 cfs
• 10 -year, 24 -hour rainfall peak flow: 303 cfs
• 100 -year, 24 -hour rainfall peak flow: 422 cfs
• 100 -year, 10 -day snowmelt peak flow: 413 cfs
Because of the large storage volume available in the two lakes, peak flows entering from the
City will be greatly attenuated prior to discharge from Peltier Lake. As stated earlier in this
chapter, the City requires that peak flow rates from the 2 -, 10 -, and 100 -year storm events be
maintained at or below existing conditions. The RCWD rules require the infiltration and /or
retention of the runoff volume generated by the 2.8 -inch storm event (for new development) or
0.8 -inch storm event (for redevelopment). The combination of all of these factors leads to a net
reduction below existing conditions for discharge leaving the City and entering Lino Lakes.
6.8 EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL
Recognizing that erosion and sediment control can best be administered on a local level, the
Centerville City Council discussed methods and policies that can be implemented to control
erosion from new construction sites. In the past, this responsibility was delegated almost fully to
the Rice Creek Watershed District. However, due to the number of construction projects the
RCWD administers during a given construction season, it is difficult for the watershed district to
inspect these projects.
The erosion and sediment control criteria for new developments that resulted from these
discussions with the City have been consolidated into an Erosion and Sediment Control Policy
for New Developments. The policy adopts the procedures and recommendations of the
Minnesota Pollution Control Agency's Protecting Water Quality in Urban Areas: Best
Management Practices for Minnesota. City Code Chapter 157 addressing Erosion Control is
provided in the appendix.
NPDES permitting requires that the MPCA should be notified of all grading activities affecting 1
acre or more. The City ensures MPCA notification through developer agreements as projects of
this scale arise.
The RCWD has encouraged the City to participate in the District's Water Quality BMP Cost -
Share Program. This is a dedicated cost -share grant program to assist property owners with the
implementation of Best Management Practices (BMPs) aimed at improving the quality of surface
waters within the District. Installing a rain garden, stabilizing erosion problems along shorelines,
restoring degraded wetlands, installation of agricultural BMPs, and installing pervious pavers
are some of the practices that may be eligible for this program. For selected projects, the
RCWD may provide funding up to 50% of total project costs up to a maximum of $5,000.
One Team. Infinite Solutions. 6.17
36
Stantec
CENTERVILLE SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN
WATER RESOURCE MANAGEMENT PLAN
September 2012
It is important to note that this policy is not intended to completely eliminate or reduce RCWD
inspection efforts within the City. Rather, this policy would be a local means of enforcing erosion
control issues with the same primary goals as the RCWD — protection of natural water resource
systems.
6.9 WETLAND MANAGEMENT
In accordance with the Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act (WCA), the RCWD currently
serves as the Local Government Unit (LGU) for WCA administration within the City. The City
anticipates that the RCWD will continue in this role in the future. Chapter 5 of the RCWD 2010
Watershed Management Plan delineates the details of the watershed district's wetland policies.
These policies govern all wetland management issues within the City.
As with floodplains and storm water facilities, all wetlands within the property limits of new
developments must be covered by protective easements. Any construction activity that may
impact wetlands may require permits from the RCWD, the US Army Corps of Engineers, and /or
MnDNR. Correspondence regarding any wetland impacts should be directed to the following:
MN Dept. of Natural Resources US Army Corps of Engineers
Kate Drewry, Area Hydrologist Andy Beaudet
1200 Warner Road St. Paul District, 180 5th Street E., Suite 700
St. Paul, MN 55106 St. Paul, MN 55101 -1678
(651) 259 -5753 (651) 290 -5642
Rice Creek Watershed District
Nick Tomczik, Permit Coordinator
4325 Pheasant Ridge Drive NE, Suite 611
Blaine, MN 55449
(763) 398 -3079
6.10 FLOODPLAIN ADMINISTRATION
Flood damage prevention requirements are contained in City Code Chapter 155 (see appendix).
The goal of the requirements is to promote the public health, safety, and general welfare and to
minimize the potential impacts of flooding such as loss of life, loss of property, disruption of
commerce and governmental services, and extraordinary public expenditures for flood
protection and relief. Figure 7 illustrates the approximate floodplain boundaries within the City.
6.11 SHORELAND REGULATION
In conversations with the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, it was determined that a
stand -alone shoreland ordinance is not required for the City, since all of the shoreline is already
developed. Instead, shoreland activities are regulated within the zoning ordinance. Section
156.133 of the zoning ordinance pertaining to shoreland activities is provided in the appendix.
One Team. Infinite Solutions. 6.18
37
StaitteC
CENTERVILLE SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN
WATER RESOURCE MANAGEMENT PLAN
September 2012
The ordinance contains provisions regulating lot size, setbacks, grading, and vegetative
alterations.
6.12 PUBLIC PARTICIPATION
The City implements a public information and education program through the City website.
Future website pages will contain information about different topics concerning water resources
within the City, as well as summaries of continuing water resource management programs.
Some possible future topics for the website are listed below:
• Educational articles on storm water management treatment.
• Educational articles on environmental policies.
• Storm sewer maintenance schedules.
• RCWD policy changes.
• City policy changes.
• Household impacts on water quality.
One Team. Infinite Solutions. 6.19
38
Stantec
CENTERVILLE SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN
IMPLEMENTATION PROGRAM
September 2012
7.0 IMPLEMENTATION PROGRAM
This chapter of the SWMP provides information as to the practical method for implementing the
programs discussed in Chapter 6. Implementation and management of programs require both
personnel and financial resources. This chapter provides information about which entities will be
responsible for which programs as well as a method for raising funds to implement programs.
7.1 ADMINISTRATION RESPONSIBILITY AND IMPROVEMENT PLAN
As stated in Section 6.2, the RCWD will continue to require permits for construction projects and
all water resource management issues within the City of Centerville. The City's programs and
policies will be administered in conjunction with RCWD programs; none of the programs and
policies proposed in this SWMP will supersede any of the RCWD programs or policies. It is
anticipated that both entities will cooperate in good faith, and in the event that management
conflicts arise, each entity agrees that a mutually agreeable solution will be arrived at as quickly
as possible through effective communication.
7.2 FINANCING OF MANAGEMENT PROGRAMS
The funding for implementation of several of the proposed programs and projects identified in
the SWMP could come from several sources. Possible sources of revenue include:
Storm water Utility Fee: Storm water Utility fees are levied on all property in the City. The fee is
collected each quarter with the sanitary sewer bill. The City's current fees are presented in
Chapter 9.
Building Permits: A cash dedication to the Storm water Utility Fund is part of the building permit
requirement.
Storm water Area Charge: New developments occurring in Centerville are charged a fee based
on the total platted area. All revenue generated from this program is deposited into the Storm
water Utility Fund. The City's current fees are presented in Chapter 9.
Special Assessments: The City may assess for improvement projects based on the benefit
provided to the affected properties. The assessment may not be greater than the benefit
provided to the property.
State and Federal Grants: Grant programs exist for water management projects and will be
explored as possible funding sources.
One Team. Infinite Solutions.
7.20
39
Stantec
CENTERVILLE SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN
IMPLEMENTATION PROGRAM
September 2012
7.3 PUBLIC PARTICIPATION THROUGH INFORMATION AND EDUCATION
The City staff prepares a City website. This website is used as a forum for providing information
and education to the residents of Centerville. Information for the website is obtained from lake
association groups, various governmental agencies, and the City Engineer.
7.4 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN SUMMARY
Projects are identified and described in Chapter 8 as potential capital improvement projects.
One Team. Infinite Solutions.
7.21
40
Stantec
CENTERVILLE SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN
September 2012
8.0 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN
8.1 INTRODUCTION
As defined in the Centerville Capital Improvements Plan, capital improvements are those
projects having a life expectancy that exceeds the financing period of the item or having a total
purchase price equal to or greater than $5,000. Included in the total capital improvement cost
are engineering, construction, land acquisition, administration, and legal and bonding fees.
Since the last update of the City's SWMP, in 2004, the City has performed all four of the capital
improvement projects identified in that plan, along with several other improvements. Completed
projects include:
Identified in 2004 SWMP
• Center Oaks Drainage Improvements
o Storm water diverted to alleviate cul -de -sac flooding.
• Shad Avenue Drainage Improvements
o Back yard drain tile installed, ditches regraded.
• Peltier Lake Drive Water Quality Improvements
o Direct flows into Clearwater Creek were intercepted in rain gardens.
• Heritage Street Water Quality Improvements
o Infiltration trench was constructed to treat storm water heading directly to
Centerville Lake.
Other improvements since 2004
• Rain Gardens on Peltier Lake Drive
o Rain gardens installed along Peltier Lake Drive as part of street reconstruction
project.
• Rain Gardens on 73rd Street
o Rain gardens installed along 73r Street as part of street reconstruction project.
• Rain Garden in Hidden Spring Park
One Team. Infinite Solutions.
8.22
41
StanteC
CENTERVILLE SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN
September 2012
o Rain garden was installed as part of an agreement to treat storm water from
2004 Street Reconstruction Project.
• Quebec Area Drainage Improvements
o Back yard drain tile installed.
• Pheasant Marsh Drainage Improvements
o Ditch grading along the west side of Pheasant Marsh 2nd Addition to improve
drainage from CBs on Mallard Way
• Phase I — Downtown Storm water Reclamation Project
o Constructed storm water -fed irrigation system in LaMotte Park. This system is
designed to take flows from the future downtown redevelopment project.
The City has identified several capital improvement projects that are considered storm water
improvement projects. The location of these projects is shown in Figure 9, and they are
described below.
These CIP projects will be implemented in order of priority as funds become available through a
combination of grants, development fees, storm water utility fees, and general taxes or special
assessments. Projects will be given priority based on their relative impact to the health, safety,
and welfare of the community. Other factors which can increase a project's priority are the
availability of grants, development, the public's willingness to be assessed, inter - agency
cooperation, and street reconstruction projects with which a project can be completed
simultaneously.
Future Storm water Capital Improvement Projects:
1. Phase II — Downtown Storm water Reclamation Project
Phase I I of this project would involve the construction of the trunk line sewer (42 ") from
the downtown area to the storm water reclamation system constructed in Phase I. This
project could be done prior to or in conjunction with the redevelopment of the downtown
area. Completing it prior to the redevelopment would eliminate the direct discharges
which currently exist from the downtown; however, the pipe would be oversized for
current flows.
Estimated Project Costs: $450,000
2. Center Oaks 2 and Royal Meadows Infiltration Features
One Team. Infinite Solutions.
8.23
42
ant&
CENTERVILLE SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN
September 2012
These two neighborhoods are due for street reconstructions with the installation of water
mains. This type of project may require the installation of rain gardens or other
infiltration features.
Estimated Project Costs: $200,000
3. Back Yard Drainage Improvements
Various small projects to improve back yard drainage around the City.
Estimated Project Costs: $100,000 (varies between $5,000 - $20,000 each)
One Team. Infinite Solutions.
8.24
43
Stantec
CENTERVILLE SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN
STORM WATER CHARGES
September 2012
9.0 STORM WATER CHARGES
The City of Centerville is currently implementing the following storm water fees:
Quarterly Storm Water Management Fee (Developed Property)
Residential $12.00 per residential unit
Commercial /Industrial $0.00344 per square foot of impervious, minimum $12.50
per unit
Storm Water Area Charge (With Developer's Agreement)
New Development $0.05739 per square foot of platted area
Storm Water Area Charge (With Building Permit)
Residential $350.00 per residential unit
Commercial /Industrial $0.07 per square foot of building, parking, and other
impervious surfaces
State statutes require that the funds collected through the storm water area charge program be
used for specific, limited uses. Likewise, fees collected citywide through the quarterly storm
water utility charge are also designated for specific uses. Below is a summary of how these
charges are to be designated.
Quarterly Storm Water Management Fee
• Regular maintenance of City storm sewer system.
• Regular sediment removal from storm water ponds.
• Public Works equipment and expenses associated with the regular storm water system
maintenance program.
• Funding of the Public Information and Education Program.
One Team. Infinite Solutions.
9.25
44
Stantec
CENTERVILLE SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN
STORM WATER CHARGES
September 2012
Storm Water Area Charge
• Improvements to existing systems due to increased load on the system from new
development.
• Construction and maintenance of trunk storm sewer to serve future developments.
• Construction and maintenance of increased ponding capacity to serve future
developments.
As shown above, the City proposes to structure the fees in such a way as to fund ongoing and
long -term maintenance programs out of the quarterly fee levied to individual property owners.
Capital costs and improvements necessary from the increased load on the storm water system
from new developments will be funded from new development storm water area charges.
One Team. Infinite Solutions.
9.26
45
StdllteC
CENTERVILLE SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN
AMENDMENT PROCESS
September 2012
10.0 AMENDMENT PROCESS
The City of Centerville Surface Water Management Plan will require periodic amendments to
address changes and to remain current. Minnesota state statute requires municipalities to
update local surface water management plans within two years following a watershed district
plan update. The Rice Creek Watershed District amended its watershed management plan in
2012. The City has updated its local SWMP for conformance with the RCWD plan.
Updates of the Capital Improvement Plan and the Comprehensive Plan may also require an
update of the SWMP. Residents or businesses within the City can also petition amendments to
the SWMP at any time.
The City will conduct a public hearing on all proposed SWMP amendments. Notice of the public
hearing and a description of the proposed amendments shall be published in the local
newspaper at least 10 days prior to the date of the hearing. At the hearing, the City will hear all
comments on the proposed SWMP amendments.
One Team. Infinite Solutions. 10.27
46
Stantec
CENTERVILLE SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN
APPENDIX
September 2012
Appendix
One Team. Infinite Solutions.
47
ST. FRANCIS
BETHE� '�
WYOMING
EAST BETHEL CHISAGO CITY
LINWOOD 8
BURNS OAK G ROVE
TWP TWP
169 8
CITY LOCATION COLUMBUS
— TWP '
\ FOREST LAKE SCANDI
RAMSEY
c 47 ANDOVER • HAM LAKE 97 —
riii FDR LAKE EST
TWP
V
101 Ss / 711*K
S I
-4111I S"
=RS DAYTON S , \ COON RAPIDS BLAINE CI
CHAMPLIN ® CENTE'�If HUGOY
I. 65
10 LINO LAKES co
` F E CIRC
CP OSSEO PINE. SHOREVIEW
wir MSUNDSVI W WHITE
SPIN
kN BROOKLYN PARK LAKE BEAR E OOD
MAPL ROVE PARK - TWP
ARDEN NORTH OAKS
HILLS
bill
MU BROOKLYN
FRIDL:
GRANT
WHITE TWP
CENTER - VADNAIS BEAR MAHTOM .DI
:RIGHTDN HEIGHTS LAKE
CRYSTAL a ,
NEW LFTLE
55 PLY )UTH HOPE RO:BINSDAL' ` CANADA op, 36 / t_— I ROSEVILLE
AUL
GOLDEN (..\ FALCON MAPLEWOOD
HEIGHT a I 1 b
VALLEY OAK. LE LAKE ELMO
0
ST. LOUIS PARK MIN . POLIS / ST. PAUL 94
HOPKIN
MINNETONKA / /;` \
J I WOODBURY
_ lk. / END: TA
en''. / HEIG S \ i'
EDINA ��/ SC UTH
I F
MPLS. /ST.PAUL 101 ST.PAUL
RICHFIELD INT.- AIRPORT ��
�NHASSEN l e S KE IS NEWPORT
■..A' 5
Q 3
EDEN PRAIRIE ST.PAUL
® .gyp ® PARK
' EAGAN
BLOOMINGTON INVER GROVE
.--' HEIGHTS
r 101
LOCATION MAP `%
CITY OF CENTERVILLE FIGURE: 1
StaideC
SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN
V:\ 1938 ACTIVE\ 193802237 \CAD \DWG\ 193802237ZFD01.DWG DATE: 3-30-12 COMM: 193802237
48
y , • 8'90
,,,, , 1N O `L £S - --< f { -- 1�. ���JJJ � � � • i
I f " o ! b 1. \
o
' o 'V y
i a I�
ro pA fg a � ,, \ \
47 lii
ake ) • +."
_LINO L AKES 15 _sow k �stt,� p Y t S
_���- -,� I , ` 7 ` � [r--i
T -- ; --- - 1,, ii. . - ,,..\-\-,- ._,......._ , ,,,,,:-. ‘
.1 .- - ri '
. >, 1,-,.. s - , T c! 1,/? Ai\
t
. �
�• . 4 1 1 r. • _ 11 . I - • • = 1 906 MAIN I _
4__
Centerville Lake
' 882
Flowin Wei F ° . L / - - 2
22 S i ,
• ave • ; • • • : ; I
• a.' ■ 0 1 • ,
c _ _._/-\ -
h II 11,. tiB1 . , e • 1912 n CE
I e if 7 / G \ _ ® _ C.' Q _�
( 820
(� o' O ill
— 1 916 .. 7 • , o t 'T� 9I3 • 24 ;/ •dg •
- . \ ii L tj F 1 I - % A " (:
ut I - P, i
vei;i: ,, . • . J 7" �,
% \9 • 900"1:4 • 913 0 C , i rf , , I' . b • �I `t A� r o o ;,
•
USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP
0
CITY OF CENTERVILLE FIGURE: 2
SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN Stantec
V:\ 1938\ ACTIVE\ 193802237 \CAD \DWG\ 193802237ZFD02.DWG DATE:3 -30 -12 COMM: 193802237
49
ii bit: .
,.: .
_,...... - — • - _
. .
___
" ;F:
i , ' ' - ■ , V,-,;,.. '
o f
.,,
\ \ N\
t 1
- - \ 0 .
- a "
v -
I
. ' t„,.. ,_■
I
. ,
. , .
. .....,...
a
' :i .. • ii,,,-,,,,
,.
._.,
:
- .... _.
i -
P ' ;
-,.
• ,
01
CD
_ . .. ., .
7 i.„ --. ,
- -
to
, . "..
o 2
,- Al 0.) n •
, Z
. n ,
.i
., . ...
. ,
, ,
. ,
,'
.4„.„,,', .
elir
COUNTY ROAD 21
- 20TH AV le' .11. .... .
.,, .
It, 7VgAVISTZ :. -
( ,
;1.' ,,.6
1 i
1 4 F g
- 4r ' g $ - . • 1 F i
I
3 z
t
1
1
r
•
•
0
"--r-
4
ii.lik_ rallik I
•
� - u eee�� ■ c.4
1PBP mg nv;;4 iTrit i al j ll
..--117 AI^ 221....- ■, filref vilEke _ .
74161. e �• In w.Adap o�.sa
BQeP' a ae eaaaao»°' nffrAIM Q °
I v °. w; cu o EN mats e p00Daaaaanal . ,341 7e a ti�
r .• i° ,Q moo oa o0a7o o ♦ � e n4 % 1 :- - � . , ee_a am ��
o_r �O p.• V. y aa0 Q �r �q E. ;,?"..to 0� �` ' � Mona obv
\ �� 0� 16■1 � ■ ° a �OEOIIiOP• °. @9�90_� T. w �� ° ■ mo •
-" - F e ee ■ ■ep e a f 1,r -„ o ■ �uu. v— 0 VI
a� !� v L -em , a ■ — ; •1 � •. ° oe oo•a
e Ain* 41116 -' ' P` 1 � '.- - �CCte a r k Im
a ` ■:.1' AA/1 q 0ani s s 4� a
� dab® 1 b ��, e ° `o % , o s a !_d , 913 2141! ;1 vv�o0��� O I� iE ir'' C;c � ta '� ■�a,AOe s� �I„ o _
7
1 R !'
�� _ ....op ac aim 0� °a• ' . / r Lo
i «<I � w o, ■ i•� 1 ° � S e'lli idar 01
•i I nr;1. ° O!o� '_9 •eoio6e �1
_h_ __ , r
gr
i 0 c.
`_ Z
in
I e 111 CL OI
e 00i a- ~
Z
`a �.
W 0 ,
.._. id 1 3
■
N - ,
Z
U.1 uJ (Y
W p
Z Z Q .
u W
3
Z 0 U
O 4 i
L z
rr
( FA ' ,
0 n
Idier
•
il \ - ' .,,
t �� 111
" r .I` ms R
t
L I /
' 24 1 :,:i \
-
, , I MN,
,,
MI 4111 i
F _11+1 \
_ , i �1 :.
-i
��r
r i
5.
I
,,„„„,,,„,ogril , .
F
g
' A w — .7,0i
s
1
3 0 °• m 0z
g 3 s # w ^9t� � cOn 2.
a y ��► N g 3 i 3 3 N� m
A C
�+ w C 7
N
1 i m if> Z m
$ s L v
a L
E
IA..
17-----------___ \ !
i - -, ■ • f • Yr 2 . •
rihatin. Iuuu , I U,i Ui lU.V ■ VIM t ,. . — ill
I I eel iti TI'4411 _4 . 2.w. ■ = Up : � .. (C;ii f °f1� .mo
Q .2 . r _� a �1 ' . it��= i
_ \.; ,L. I -. i j .. 11 v - I ' L_,. . .9m1,1111
1 r ►. � ` �� ��1 i S U � ` - 111 } •
IVA
CC II I
1
C ; T:!.. IkJ
i \ 111 d VI
iiil
i 1 .� ,
!
r; J
! Y
1 z
i 1 $ of
! C YIYKYY.III
-� `:. i LZ
i cu i
i .(7)
i C
y
'} i d a
! fn
i
i a a
! ' %. - i , � C -� 3 'E f
i i O 1IHi J U a
c CV u i« s s! i g E 2
W C
1 U
5 > + o
w w
U
E.
8
/
��� , p
�� N $
- n o
m w
D o ,
CD 11 1
`1011141 In ? — lc _ _
H Pli@ i ili 2 N 7
*ifi W r M .
.7 s . b = Pd' 3 O %. . 4
3 Ii 3 Q 5 � .
_6 i :
` :\
i
8 7 i 1 y
co v E
li 4 11840 i i
111 IIp i
anil O 1_: 11 _ 1
II : Dili` :■ . '�� i i
cn Aililligirs
r 111
,. so 1 i �.
� � ' . Rlie ; w i 3 i fi i
1 , � Ua nu mmm n enI u1 1l lihllr ,
i ' Inn i�
_ ______ � �• � � ,wR I j ; eee CP�un�� �
=FA _ 1
• M 1111
i
, Moit.._.7 . \Weil .",
I
E ; IFF1 ::::-..:- I Mt
• 11 EFFEErFRE
rc—T MUM
rtv•Yi : 1Will. 3 1121111
;: 1 11611111 MM [
'�cQe si°oe° ° °F�7E9EEE7�a v °� a � k �"
q V°° °°°, � A 0 f��
a off rregi Er 2m. p �� 4d� os
r a E9e w+ •' O Q :13 OD
s oa e� o aeove�q osl4ao�� � � d
ee�p1Ep w.e . Z3 Ch I 2 u 1Ar ' � � dd 0 0 v v o Ind uLtiir `�aeee ernees : ;seeee niirasiiiiem�itavAO'
Care) gat ' ijfili aee00 l o v:., el s
w�� - i''' a lirr CC0QbY I 41, • a s d
Y w\ .., no 00 e p000ne0000 0 1 F.7 . CV ws a " sal a��
N/1.01; eu. �:j a it me sv Q•.
� w a' " o° °° 07� o o a000 c � QO f ��e viii g tang Iii, v..O oLaeavo4
MAO a 0s4o�� ' � �P ol ,�d °oVtls�s�n Fiis �. s a1 �m f
_ eo A01 eo'Ir+a :u. °0 de.:_511N is " ' T '� " � ° °a ri a
r .- a Se .
� ■
q iea �I ■aea ■ '0 °440 ' ao01v V�
10
; S ° ce\ i iii? 6: !Ix hig E r 1Qiv °e d o
` :Q M 171"g ' rIjj a — _ _ MO 9 rai 21-
V shwa Q a v� - - sIS'� � �� w►
cOJ 9i0 v ail ` f iv d'R': ii *7110 Je u ■ v , ea v aaa I in
• J . ��� 4a � a� °
.1 lia
i , " � A''''.4,," � '��o�i S fi1e1 <a000r
i .. � � v o 000ee 9ll es a see:
\ `. �. Nr:
-.. 4 :!: iii ,.
.!o m
�o':
c y 4S11'
Ad ..
...
Ira\ 0 iedi 0) „, z
/ ''''.= 2
e
i I g „ 1 ; i -t- ,4 i
ill
r.r plii
u 1 ,
Nv� x � �ii!8o<�s = ss z
` vo,. ® s
eeE>r�■_ 1 a
K
J
t
TRW, MP .
�o �
� , m1o1e11� v. : -
e � , �e �w v 94CC / e �EbB QO EC^c ' E aioClBv Raul '
�F ! p• !Ipli i ,�° iimigi ° �,,, , i to'iiiihroo O n�ie I , I
/ii �� � � I ,o,1 �o� 4.ve .ile [oovM .. oo'o �..
i 1� 0 e ee bi[ [ii9 0 op99 d eo q Doer
®A ; �' � d® 4 ' .e oagao��o061MonILI
���� �� _fie. - . {I11� _o Qo ao v oo[oiiilina
'��% _ e°�c = , 0009 ii � o -0
�P o oDR o a D9 9iG f""�I
'�
y 4 a o nr v f ¢roc
��� LoO� r�G °o v ° L
� '1'
a■ m i n t oo °a ot P ye h lj . s .
4 cm nn O 0, t
■ G ` e
111.M. im o4aoo a ° 114, e E
� � o °, Al °
Est l ..■® � o V WIC r° o4aQ ___� ■ ■ �, nn
�� . c
� Mir
FLOOOPLAN MAP ' -� t OM � .., � .4 ..... > � ° 1 o -
�iB i P i f s ► -. •IN
MI 100 BEM MOOR. ^ __tit M t? i
p x ■gee �� StE
e'.- xo xua ROaoR.uH `, 11 412:� ° �'� ce�e , FE � �ae r i.
clam ORA NUa OMR S ���i1 D a7ea�li►��� iuc i
NOTE ROOORAIN MID ROODR'AY EgMOMNES ARE IN 1 mom. d
Oi: 11\11I� Y .i> d -
FOR REEmIa oar. THIS YAP a NOT TO BE USED "11 :, oO.fiii- , ...
FOR REGULATORY PURPOSES. 21"1114 �P g e P t a k% r r- ..r a
IL d� P ■ ■4Lolrwlit
otvo A a ee e c a Bo s4� in ft.
°o IOVP �:, �0 4a
I
0 oo�ao¢� ' • ■
'��_II �Aik. COMMUNITY FLOOD NEL NO. 27 0001 C
(REVISED JUNE 2, 1999)
FLOODPLAIN MAP (�/�
CITY OF CENTERVILLE FIGURE 9 V �1
SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN ��ii"
Stwatot
V:\ 1938\ ACTIVE \ 193802237 \CAD\DN'G \1938022372F009ANG DATE: 3 -30 -12 CONK 193802237
56
r - I '� nee
1
pliii
oppo Tm 1 la' °661 ®i 4- s �a1f *
/ y ee°, ` v" "a? 'A ' '�eC a 17 aCIiC01 r rnja130220 L
e�e ® e...�. 0 �� �e m � Ank O ° Vo g a ...." 4a //a _ e l _ I �An a e v oo g i
1�r0 1 �,. �� II:GI00 YEOe v
, � � L1 1,; � �eeee ■ � o .�:a .. �iceae AL is a 1vo�� I O�o I
X O" " I `', I A �. �°�� °nhv0e °�v ° 9ii11 I1�. ° . •
� _ � i %Ai * P a t e . 1 RV aeu u e a
_ i IIIOfS, LJ� IlII I0116oQ
a-C-i `P�� Q0� ■DLL r '
���� a r Ea �ACL:H o G
, m O
„` II pCGGG GC: p O I C2L00 C ; M
7O
pm TIiiinc r n v ' R;.e�O eaeu.`�" '
.
1 -
oaf ;ITCH v ....1111
_�_ I Mi a , 4400 o e. coal file L
— ..91 iia.:-aiipecam94...zplin lipir .11, .
STORM SEWER MAP , 1I Drlt41, e�s040 %VI n MEN
Savo �� ,� ! I ` e . ° ., o W e 141101710 91. t 1
/♦ tea..; a.,Oo- r1 , • WOW COWL RR 1.1 01344, Kl1[11CLCIE ME ..., f a lt� /,I 0000voPl ialo E le
MAW PT. 'la �■O YY�o I�``ppo i1L -mn,'" L o �.
r :hula gieltrAili 62■•11..._EalltWiae.°15Litilif L___En
' - laliMmt;iiiumw iv' ,
7 Ittr Me gad IIEL IIIIIII
._ CLONIWI CIIII. WI e,ofifr_ swt�v io09oV 1P
= RIP ... Z.. v YoYP ! ...f.... 6 d ' N
v 01
1 o
to lle 00 :' L . w'
a I 'o 1 ... M
�Il __�
STORM SEWER & DRAINAGE BASIN MAP
L.`
CITY OF CENTERVILLE FIGURE 10
SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN
��
V \ 1938\ ACTIVE\ 193802237 \ CAD \ DWG \ 193802237ZFD10. DWG DATE, 3 -30 -12 COMM: 103802237
57
DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT
10/3/2012
CITY OF CENTERVILLE
ANOKA COUNTY, MINNESOTA
ORDINANCE #
SECOND SERIES
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CITY CODE , CHAPTER 156, SECTIONS 156.006
DEFINITIONS & 156.016 - 156.052 ZONING DISTRICTS
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CENTERVILLE ORDAINS:
Section 1. The following definitions shall be added to Chapter 156, Section 156.006
DEFINITIONS:
DAYCARE FACILITIES. A state - licensed daycare facility, as defined in M.S. Chapter
462, as may be amended. FAMILY DAYCARE and GROUP FAMILY DAYCARE daycare
facilities as defined in M.S. Chapter 245A, as may be amended.
KENNEL, COMMERCIAL. Any place where four or more domestic animals over the age
of six months are kept, owned, boarded, bred or offered for sale, and every COMMERCIAL
KENNEL shall be enclosed or fenced in a manner as to prevent the running at large or escape
of the domestic animal(s) confined therein.
NURSING HOME or REST HOME. A licensed establishment having
accommodations for the continuous care of five* or more invalid, infirm, aged convalescent
patients or disabled persons that are nonrelated, and holding a state issued license for
facilities subject to M.S. Section 144A.01, Subd. 5, as amended.
PET SHOP. Any establishment engaged in the business of breeding, buying, selling or
boarding animals of any species.
PUBLIC BUILDING. Any building or structure owned or leased by the city.
PUBLIC PARK. Any real property owned or leased by the city.
PUBLIC PROPERTY. Any street or highway that includes the entire width between the
boundary lines of every way publicly maintained for the purposes of vehicular travel, and
shall also mean any other publicly owned property or facility.
RECREATIONAL USE. Golf courses, tennis courts, driving ranges, archery ranges,
picnic grounds, boat - launch ramps, swimming areas, parks, wildlife and nature preserves,
game farms, fish hatcheries, shooting preserves, target ranges, trap and skeet ranges, hunting
and fishing areas, hiking, bicycling and horseback riding trails.
RESIDENTIAL CARE. State - licensed care, defined by M.S. Section 254A.02, Subd.
14. as amended.
58
DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT
10/3/2012
RESIDENTIAL CARE FOR JUVENILE SEX OFFENDERS. State - licensed care
performed in a residential facility whose primary purpose is to treat juveniles who have
violated criminal statutes relating to sex offenses or have been adjudicated delinquent on the
basis of conduct in violation of criminal statutes relating to sex offenses.
RESIDENTIAL FACILITY. A state - licensed residential facility, defined by M.S.
Chapter 462, as amended, serving six or fewer persons, in a single - family residential district
and no more than 16 persons in a multiple - family residential district.
SPECIALIZED CARE FACILITY. A state- licensed care facility which is not
otherwise specifically defined or regulated elsewhere in this chapter.
VETERINARY HOSPITAL. Any establishment maintained and operated by a licensed
veterinarian for the diagnosis and treatment of diseases and injuries of animals. Does not include
boarding animals that are not being treated for disease or injury.
Section 2. City Code, Chapter 156, Sections 156.016 through 156.052 is hereby
amended to read as follows:
§ 156.016 RURAL RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (R -1).
(A) Purpose. The purpose of the R -1 District is to allow agricultural activities and
nonsewered residential dwellings as interim uses of the land. The city has limited vacant
land for development and all land in the city is planned for eventual urban uses. Because of
the limited duration anticipated for agricultural uses in the city and the incompatibilities
which often exist between agricultural and nonagricultural uses, permitted uses in the R -1
District will not reflect intensive commercial agricultural uses.
(B) Permitted uses. See Table 156 -A.1
(C) Special requirements. Agricultural uses are permitted in the R -1 District subject to
the following requirements:
(1) Feed lots, runs, pens and similar intensively used facilities for animal raising
and care shall not be located within 300 feet of a neighboring property; and
(2) Accessory farm buildings shall not be erected within 100 feet of a neighboring
property.
§ 156.017 HIGH- DENSITY SINGLE - FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (R -2A).
(A) Purpose. It is intended that the R -2A District provide for higher- density single -
family detached, attached and multiple - dwelling opportunities in areas where public utilities
are available and required for service. The design and circulation of new residential areas are
also intended to be complementary with and enhance the community's small -town
atmosphere.
59
DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT
10/3/2012
(B) Permitted uses and structures. See Table 156 -A.1
(B) Conditional uses. See Table 156 -A.1
§ 156.018 SINGLE - FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (R -2).
(A) Purpose. It is intended that the R -2 District provide for lower- density traditional
single - family detached dwelling opportunities in areas where public utilities are available and
required for service. The design and circulation of new residential areas are also intended to
be complementary with and enhance the community's small -town atmosphere.
(B) Permitted uses and structures. See Table 156 -A.1
§ 156.019 SINGLE - FAMILY MANUFACTURED HOUSING DISTRICT (R -4).
(A) Purpose. It is intended that the R -4 District provide for high- density single - family,
detached residential opportunities in areas where public utilities are available and required for
service. The design and circulation of new residential areas are also intended to be
complementary with and enhance the community's small -town atmosphere.
(B) Permitted uses and structures. See Table 156 -A.1
(C) Special requirements. Manufactured homes are permitted in all residential
districts if they meet the design criteria for those districts. All other manufactured homes
shall be located only in designated manufactured home districts which meet the requirements
of this chapter. The general intent of this district is to provide for manufactured housing in
subdivided developments, in safe, attractive residential neighborhoods with all urban services
and desired amenities as other residential areas
(1) Manufactured homes shall not be parked on any public street or on any tract of
land except as provided in this section. Emergency or temporary stopping or parking is
permitted on a public street for not longer than three hours subject to any other and further
prohibitions, regulations or limitations imposed by the traffic and parking regulations or
ordinances for that public street.
(2) No more than one manufactured home may be located on any single parcel of
land.
(3) The manufactured home bottom shall be constructed on a continuous perimeter
footing and foundation meeting the requirements of the Building Code for residential
structures.
60
DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT
10/3/2012
(D) Planned Unit Development Required. No person shall erect, establish, extend or
enlarge a manufactured housing development, park, or cooperative within the limits of the
city without first obtaining approval as a planned unit development from the City Council
upon receipt of the recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission. Approval
shall be granted only upon compliance with all the following:
(1) Compliance with all other terms of this zoning chapter;
(2) Compliance with all the terms of Chapter 153; and
(3) The proposed development must be located in the city's urban service area as
shown in the comprehensive development plan, and all manufactured homes must be
individually served by public utilities as required for all new residential dwellings.
§ 156.020 SINGLE - FAMILY RESIDENTIAL - ESTATE DISTRICT (R -5).
(A) Purpose. It is intended that the R -5 District provide for low- density traditional
single - family residential where public utilities are available and required for service. The
design and circulation of new residential areas are also intended to be complementary with
and enhance the community's small -town atmosphere.
(B) Permitted uses. See Table 156 -A.1
§ 156.021 HIGH- DENSITY MULTI - FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (R -3).
(A) Purpose. It is intended that the R -3 District provide for higher- density residential
district where a variety of dwelling types are permitted, provided the overall density
of the property meets the district goal of 12 units per acre. The design and
circulation of new residential areas are also intended to be complementary with and
enhance the community's small -town atmosphere. All development within the
district shall be submitted for consideration through the Planned Unit Development
process. A site submitted for Planned Unit Development in this district shall be a
minimum of two acres.
(B) Permitted and conditional uses and structures. See Table 156 -A.1
(C) Special Requirements.
(1) Existing uses that are not in conformance with this section may not be
expanded, but may continue as nonconforming uses. These nonconforming
uses may be repaired and maintained and are allowed minor improvements
that do not expand the use.
(2) In making decisions about land use compatibility and dimensional
criteria for uses and structures, the City shall have broad discretion to
protect the public health, safety and welfare; and to protect the integrity of
surrounding residential neighborhoods. Development or redevelopment of
61
DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT
10/3/2012
any parcel shall be accomplished by submitting application as a Planned
Unit Development.
(3) RESIDENTIAL CARE FOR JUVENILE SEX OFFENDERS. The City
finds that this use is appropriate for the R -3 district, but determines that in
order to protect the safety of children and other vulnerable persons, this use
should be located away from places that children and other vulnerable persons
frequently are present. Such care may only be performed at a location no less
than 1500 feet from any bike path or trail, bus stop, school, day care, nursing
home, residential facility serving children or vulnerable persons, public park,
recreational use facility, or other public or private place where children or
vulnerable persons would normally frequent or congregate.
(4) No development in this district is permitted without city water and
sanitary service.
(5) Appendix A, "District Regulations Lot and Yard Requirements" is
hereby amended to include requirements that shall apply to this district.
(Ord. 2d, #45, Added 02/02/2010)
§ 156.022 THROUGH 156.029 RESERVED FOR FUTURE EXPANSION.
§ 156.030 COMMERCIAL DISTRICT (B -1).
(A) Purpose. It is intended that the B -1 District provide opportunities for retail and
service business uses which require larger development sites, highway visibility or highway
access.
(B) General minimum requirements. The following minimum requirements, as set
forth, shall apply to all buildings that may be erected, converted or structurally altered in
commercial districts.
(C) Off-street parking. Off - street parking shall be provided as required in this chapter.
(D) Buffer zone between commercial and residential districts. Where a commercial
district abuts a residential district, any new development shall include a buffer zone. There
shall be a protective strip of not less than ten feet in width. This protective strip shall contain
no structures, shall not be used for parking, off - street loading or storage, and shall be
landscaped. The landscape treatment shall include a compact screen wall or fence, but shall
not extend within 15 feet of the street right -of -way. The planting or fence design must be
approved by the site plan review process. The site plan review process requires review by
the Planning and Zoning Committee and the City Council, as set forth in this chapter.
(E) Screening requirements. If the City Council requires any type of screening as a
condition for a variance, conditional use, or interim use permit, the applicant shall comply
with the following conditions:
(1) File a copy of the screening plans with the Zoning Administrator;
62
DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT
10/3/2012
(2) The screening, planting or construction, or both shall be complete within one
year from the date of the building permit, subject to extension by the City Council; and
(3) The screening shall be maintained after completion.
(F) Landscaping. A minimum of ten percent of any lot shall be green space. Three
percent of the surface area of the land within a parking area shall be landscaped with grass
and shrubbery or other approved ground cover. Landscaped areas will continue to be
maintained by the property owner on a continuous basis. Green areas within abutting street
rights -of -way will also be maintained by the property owner. Other requirements are set forth
in this chapter.
(G) Accessory Structures. Garages, accessory structures, screen walls, buildings and
exposed areas of retaining walls shall be of similar type, quality and appearance as the
principal structure. The height of an accessory structure shall not exceed the height of the
principal structure.
(H) Permitted encroachments. The following shall not be considered as encroachments
on setbacks subject to other conditions within this chapter: off - street parking spaces, flues,
belt course, leaders, sills, pilaster, lintels, cornices, eaves, gutters, awnings, open terraces,
service station pump islands, open canopies, steps, chimneys, flagpoles, ornamental features,
open fire escapes, sidewalks and fences, except as hereinafter amended.
(1) Driveways.
(1) No driveway shall be located within 100 feet of any right -of -way line of a
street intersection. The distances shall be measured along the property line from the corner
right -of -way and county line.
(2) Access drive onto county roads shall require a review by the City Engineer.
This review shall be measured along the property line from the corner right -of -way and
county line.
(J) Refuse.
(1) Garbage and rubbish containers shall be placed at the rear of the premises or in
a manner as to be out of view from the street. In no event shall containers or their enclosures
be placed or maintained in a way to unreasonably interfere with the use or enjoyment of
adjoining property.
(2) All garbage containers shall be screened with a suitable enclosure.
(K) Permitted uses. See Table 156 -A.'L Comment Conditional uses below
were inserted to correspond with
Ordinance 56, 2° Series. DL.
(1) Uses not explicitly enumerated in this section as permitted uses, but closely
similar thereto as determined by the Planning and Zoning Commission, provided these uses
are not explicitly mentioned as permitted or conditional uses elsewhere in this Chapter.
(Ord. 2d, #40. Amended 12/22/2010)
63
DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT
10/3/2012
(L) Conditional uses.
(1) Automotive vehicle and motorized equipment sales and service, excluding
salvage operations, provided;
(a) the outside sales lot shall not be larger in square footage than two
times the square footage of the building devoted to the related business.
(b) the sales lot used to park vehicles to be sold or serviced shall be a
separate and distinct from the area of the premises used to park vehicles necessary
to satisfy the minimum parking required by this Code.
(c) all repair assembly disassembly or maintenance of vehicles shall occur
within a closed building except minor maintenance including tire inflation, adding
oil and wiper replacement. Vehicles that are inoperable or are missing body parts
shall be stored inside a building or in a properly screened area, provided however
that vehicles which are inoperable, missing body parts, or are unlicensed may not
be stored outside a building longer than 90 days or in a properly screened area,
provided however that vehicles which are inoperable, missing body parts, or are
unlicensed may not be stored outside a building longer than 90 days.
(2) Farm implements sales and service;
(a) the outside equipment storage lot shall not be larger in square footage
than two times the square footage of the building devoted to the related business
(b) all repair assembly disassembly or maintenance of vehicles and
implements shall occur within a closed building except minor maintenance
including tire inflation, adding oil and wiper replacement. Vehicles that are
inoperable or are missing body parts shall be stored inside a building.
(3) Building supply sales and storage yards;
(a) the outside equipment and inventory storage lot shall not be larger in
square footage than two times the square footage of the building devoted to the
related business.
(4) Funeral homes and mortuaries;
(5) Animal clinics. )
(Ord. 2d, #53. Amended 5/9/2012
(M) Commercial exterior building materials.
(1) Except as otherwise regulated herein, the exterior wall surfaces of all new or
expanded commercial buildings shall consist of face brick, finished block or other textured
masonry product approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission.
64
DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT
10/3/2012
(2) Exceptions to all masonry exteriors may be considered and approved by the
Planning and Zoning Commission provided the following findings are met:
(a) The combination of exterior materials is used as an architectural
complement to the structure;
(b) The combination of exterior materials used is not inconsistent with the
quality and appearance used on similar buildings in the same zoning district or neighborhood;
(c) Site conditions limit public exposure to certain exterior surfaces where
masonry products are not proposed; and
(d) An exterior wall may be temporary and a future expansion area of a
structure and be subject to removal or redesign as an interior wall.
(3) Buildings are required to have contrasting architectural features and must be
designed to be aesthetically pleasing.
(N) Interim uses in B -1 District.
(1) Industrial uses that existed on a site in the I -1 Industrial district as a legal, fully
conforming use prior to the site being rezoned from I -1 to B -1, may continue and be
expanded on that site as if located in an I -1 District until the use is changed to a use that is
permitted in this district. After it is changed to a use permitted the B -1 district, it may not
thereafter be used except as permitted in this district. Where the proposed change from I -1 to
B -2 has been initiated by the City, the Planning and Zoning Commission shall simultaneously
with making such zoning change, determine whether such parcel is a fully conforming
industrial use qualifying for interim use status. Where a positive determination is made, the
action shall be filed with the Anoka County Recorder.
(Ord. 2d, #37, Amended 9/22/2010, Ord. 2d # 46, amended 03/23/2011)
Cross - reference:
Setbacks, see Appendix A, Table 1, Schedule of District Regulations Lot and Yard
Requirements and Table 156 -A.1 District Allowed Uses
Signs, see Chapter 152
§§ 156.031 THROUGH 156.039 RESERVED FOR FUTURE EXPANSION.
§ 156.040 INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT (I -1).
(A) Purpose. It is intended that the I -1 District provide opportunities for light
manufacturing and industrial uses, trade businesses, machine shops and other more extensive
land uses.
65
DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT
10/3/2012
(B) General minimum requirements. The following minimum requirements, as set
forth herein, shall apply to all buildings that may be erected, converted or structurally altered
in industrial districts.
(C) Setbacks. Specific setbacks are set forth in Appendix A, Table 1, District
Regulations e ulatio Lot and Yard Requirements. In addition, side yards facing ards facin streets on comer lots
g q
shall be considered the same as front yards. Where a front yard or side yard of a comer lot
faces a residential district across a street, the setback from the street shall be not less than 60
feet.
(D) Off-street parking. Off - street parking shall be provided as required by this chapter.
All open street parking areas having more than six parking spaces shall be effectively
screened by a wall, fence of acceptable design or compact hedge along all sides which adjoin
or are directly across the street from the property in a residential zone or institutional use.
The wall, fence or hedge shall be maintained in good condition. Plans for fencing shall be
approved by the City Council. The fence shall not be used for advertising purposes;
(E) Buffer zone between industrial and residential districts. Where the side yard of
any industrial district abuts a residential district, the minimum side yard setback shall be 60
feet. Parking of vehicles will be permitted within 40 feet of the side yard line. All side yard
areas not utilized for parking shall be landscaped with screening provided along the side lot
line to within 15 feet of any public right -of -way.
(F) Screening requirements. If the City Council requires any type of screening as a
condition for a variance or, conditional use, or interim use the applicant shall comply with the
following conditions:
(1) File a copy of the screening plans with the Zoning Administrator;
(2) The screening, planting or construction, or both shall be complete within one
year from the date of building permit, subject to extension by the City Council;
(3) The screening shall be maintained after completion; and
(4) A dollar amount of one and one -half times the estimated cost of planting and
construction of the screening shall be filed with the city in the form of a cash escrow or letter
of credit. The cash escrow or letter of credit amount shall be forfeited to the city if any
provisions of this section are violated.
(G) Landscaping. A minimum of ten percent of any lot shall be green space. Three
percent of the surface area of the land within a parking area shall be landscaped with grass
and shrubbery or other approved ground cover. Landscaped areas will continue to be
maintained by the property owner on a continuous basis. Green areas within abutting street
rights -of -way will also be maintained by the property owner. Additional landscaping
regulations are set forth in § 156.116.
(H) Accessory structures. Garages, accessory structures, screen walls and exposed
areas of retaining walls shall be of similar type, quality and appearance as the principal
structure. Accessory structures shall comply with other requirements of this chapter.
66
DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT
10/3/2012
(I) Permitted encroachments. The following shall not be considered as encroachments
on setbacks subject to other conditions within this chapter: off - street parking spaces, flues,
belt course, leaders, sills, pilaster, lintels, cornices, eaves, gutters, awnings, open terraces,
service station pump islands, open canopies, steps, chimneys, flagpoles, ornamental features,
open fire escapes, sidewalks and fences, except as hereinafter amended.
(J) Driveways.
(1) No driveway shall be located within 100 feet of any right -of -way line of a
street intersection. This distance shall be measured along the property line from the corner
right -of -way line.
(2) Access drives onto county roads shall require a review by the City Engineer.
(K) Refuse.
(1) Garbage and rubbish containers shall be placed at the rear of the premises or in
a manner as to be out of view from the street. In no event shall containers or their enclosures
be placed or maintained in a way to unreasonably interfere with the use or enjoyment of
adjoining property.
(2) All garbage containers shall be screened with a suitable enclosure.
(L) Loading facilities. Loading facilities shall be on the side of rear yards. When
adjacent to and /or visible from any public street, the facilities must be adequately screened.
(M) Storage. For the purpose of this zoning district, car, vans and pickup trucks parked
outside and used by employees and/or visitors in the normal course of the business operation
will not be construed to be outdoor storage. Further, outside parked trucks and semi - trailers
used in the normal business commerce will not be construed to be outdoor storage:
(1) Provided that the total number of trucks and semi - trailers does not exceed the
number of docks and/or bay doors; and
(2) This use is not construed as an operation listed as a conditional use in any
industrial zone.
(N) Permitted uses. See Table 156 -A.1
(1) Uses not explicitly enumerated in this section as permitted uses, but closely
similar thereto as determined by the Planning and Zoning Commission, provided these uses
are not explicitly mentioned as permitted or conditional uses elsewhere in this Chapter.
(Ord. 2d, #40. Amended 12/22/2010)
(0) Conditional uses. See Table 156-A.1
67
DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT
10/3/2012
(P) Industrial exterior building materials. Industrial buildings are required to be
constructed of brick, decorative block or approved textured masonry product. Pole bam type
buildings are not allowed. Buildings are required to have contrasting architectural features
and must be designed to be aesthetically pleasing.
Cross- reference:
Signs, see Chapter 152
Adult business licensing, see Chapter 110
§§ 156.041 THROUGH 156.049 RESERVED FOR FUTURE EXPANSION.
§ 156.050 PUBLIC/INSTITUTIONAL DISTRICT (P -1).
(A) Purpose. It is intended that the P -1 District provide opportunities for government
facilities, schools, churches, hospitals, libraries and other similar public and institutional uses.
(B) Permitted uses.
(1) Government buildings, structures, facilities, utilities, rights -of -way, easements,
parks, open spaces and vacant land; and
(2) Schools, churches, cultural and educational facilities and uses, libraries, hospitals and
health facilities.
§ 156.051 MIXED USE DISTRICT (M -1).
(A) Purpose. It is intended that the M -1 District implement the "Master Plan and
Development Guidelines for Downtown Centerville," adopted by the City Council on
January 11, 2006 (the "Redevelopment Plan"), and provide for the unique layout and
character of a traditional central business district with retail, professional office, accessory
residential and other mixed uses.
(B) Permitted uses. See Table 156 -A.1
(C) Special requirements. The following special requirements are intended to implement
the Redevelopment Plan, which is incorporated herein by reference.
(1) Existing uses that are not in conformance with this section may not be
expanded, but may continue as nonconforming uses. Additions to a nonconforming single -
family residential structure may be allowed, provided the square footage of the main floor of
the home is not increased by more than 33% from that which existed on January 11, 2006.
Also, accessory buildings or uncovered decks and porches may be constructed in conjunction
with nonconforming single - family uses, provided they meet all of the conditions, including
setbacks, as required in the R -2 Single Family District. (Ord. 2d #36, amended 7/14/2010)
(2) In making decisions about land use compatibility and dimensional criteria for
uses and structures, the City shall have broad discretion to protect the public health, safety
and welfare; and to protect the integrity of the M -1 District and surrounding residential
68
DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT
10/3/2012
neighborhoods. Redevelopment of any parcel shall be accomplished by submitting
application as a Planned Unit Development.
(3) Driveway access to any use shall not be permitted from Centerville Road or
Main Street but rather planned side streets and alleys must be used for such access.
(4) The architectural design and exterior building materials used in connection with
any new or expanded use or structure shall be consistent with any architectural design or
aesthetic control requirements established by the Redevelopment Plan. The city will engage
the services of a consultant architect to assist with the review. The cost of such services may
be charged to the applicant.
(5) Stormwater management will be accomplished through regional stormwater
facilities. Construction of the stormwater facilities may be accomplished through coordinated
private improvements and public improvements, and maintenance of the stormwater facilities
may be accomplished through district -wide assessments and user fees. Individual stormwater
improvements that are not part of the planned regional stormwater management facilities are
not permitted in the M -2 District.
(Ord. 2d, #3. Amended 5/10/2006)
____ - -{ Comment: M -2 is missing. DL
§ 156.052 MIXED USE NEIGHBORHOOD DISTRICT (M -2).
(A) Purpose. It is intended that the M -2 District implement the "Master Plan and
Development Guidelines for Downtown Centerville," adopted by the City Council on
January 11, 2006 ( "The Redevelopment Plan"), and provide for higher density residential
uses and accessory retain and office uses to complement the adjoining M -1 District and
existing neighborhoods.
(B) Permitted Uses. See Table 156 -A.1
(1) Residential uses with a density between 12 and 30 units per acre.
(2) Ground level retail or offices up to 25% of a structure, provided that the use is
on a corner lot.
(C) Special Requirements. The following special requirements are intended to
implement the Redevelopment plan, which is incorporated herein by reference.
(1) Existing uses that are not in conformance with this section may not be expanded,
but may continue as nonconforming uses. Additions to a nonconforming single - family
residential structure may be allowed, provided the square footage of the main floor of the
home is not increased by more than 33% from that which existed on January 11, 2006. Also,
accessory buildings or uncovered decks and porches may be constructed in conjunction with
nonconforming single - family uses, provided they meet all of the conditions, including
setbacks, as required in the R -2 Single Family District. (Ord. 2d #36, amended 7/14/2010)
(2) In making decisions about land use compatibility and dimensional criteria for
uses and structures, the City shall have broad discretion to protect the public health, safety
69
DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT
10/3/2012
and welfare; and to protect the integrity of the M -2 District, adjacent M -1 District and
surrounding residential neighborhoods. Redevelopment of any parcel shall be accomplished
by submitting application as a Planned Unit Development.
(3) Driveway access to any use shall not be permitted from Centerville Road or
Main Street but rather planned side streets and alleys must be used for such access.
(4) The Redevelopment Plan establishes a shared parking plan. Applicants for
permits shall indicate how they will conform to the parking plan, including potential
dedication of property for shared parking or public parking lots. The city shall have broad
discretion in determining whether to accept ownership and maintenance of shared parking
facilities. Maintenance of public parking and other public facilities may be accomplished
through creation of a Downtown Service District and may include maintenance assessments
or user fees.
(5) The architectural design and exterior building materials used in connection with
any new or expanded use or structure shall be consistent with any architectural design or
aesthetic control requirements established by the Redevelopment Plan. The City will engage
the services of a consultant architect to assist with the review. The cost of such services may
be charged to the applicant.
(6) Stormwater management will be accomplished through regional stormwater
facilities. Construction of the stormwater facilities may be accomplished through coordinated
private improvements and public improvements, and maintenance of the stormwater facilities
may be accomplished through district -wide assessments and user fees. Individual stormwater
improvements that are not part of the planned regional stormwater management facilities are
not permitted in the M -1 District.
(Ord. 2d #3, adopted 5/10/2006)
Section 3. Table 156 -A.1 is hereby adopted and incorporated into City Code Chapter
156.
Section 4. Effective Date: This ordinance shall be effective immediately upon its
passage and publication of the summary attached as Exhibit A, according to law.
PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED this day of , 2012 by the City
Council of the City of Centerville.
Tom Wilharber, Mayor
ATTEST:
Teresa Bender, City Clerk
70
DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT
10/3/2012
Exhibit A
Summary of Ordinance _ , Second Series
Notice is hereby given, that on , 2012, Ordinance Number , Second
Series, entitled "AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CITY CODE, CHAPTER 156 Sections
156.016 - 156.052 Zoning Districts," was adopted by the City Council of Centerville,
Minnesota.
Notice is further given that due to the lengthy nature of the ordinance, the City
Council has directed that this title and summary be prepared for publication pursuant to
Minn. Stat. 412.191, Subd. 4.
Notice is further given that a complete printed copy of the ordinance is available
for inspection by any person during normal business hours of the City Clerk, 1880 Main
St., Centerville, MN, or will be mailed to anyone requesting it by telephone (651) 429-
3232.
Notice is further given that the general purpose of the ordinance is to restate the
zoning use districts and incorporate a chart of allowed uses.
Section 1. This section amends Chapter 156, by adding certain definitions to
Section 156.006
Section 2. This section amends Chapter 156, section 156.016- 156.052 restating
the zoning districts.
Section 3. This section adopts Table 156 -A.1 District Allowed Uses.
Section 4. This section provides for an effective date of the ordinance upon
publication of this summary.
Notice is further given that the Council has by a minimum 4/5 vote approved this
public notice on the day of , 2012.
Teresa Bender, City Clerk
Published in the Citizen on , 2012
71
TABLE 156 -A.1 District Allowed Uses 10/2J20121
,Qro / //(L/i ^ o ^ O Oy Use Category and Use Type Q ^ ^ Q N. Q y Q , Q1 y it ^ h ro K. Q I, P /
Agricultural Uses
Crop production and vegetable gardening P
Produce stands for products raised on the -
premises P I
i
Tree nurseries and sod farms P
Horses, livestock and fowl, not exceeding a
density of one horse or livestock animal per acre P
or three fowl per acre
Group Living Uses
Nursing homes C
Residential -Care for six or Fewer Persons P P P P P P P P
(Except Juvenile Sex Offender Treatment)
Residential -Care for Juvenile Sex Offender
Treatment for up to six persons.
156.021 (B), 3 --
Residential -Care for seven through sixteen
Persons (Except Juvenile Sex Offender
Treatment) (Subject to conditions as are C
necessary to protect the health and safety of the
residents of the residential facility
Family Day Care serving twelve or fewer persons P P P p P P p p 1
Group Family Day Care serving 14 or fewer
persons
Licensed day care serving thirteen through
sixteen persons
Licensed day care serving seventeen or more
persons C C
Specialized Care Facility C C C
Household Living Uses
Single- family detached dwellings at a density not
exceeding one home per ten acres
-
Single- family detached dwellings P P P P
Single -family attached dwellings with up to two
dwelling units per building
Single- family attached dwellings with up to
twelve dwelling units per acre
Single - family attached or detached dwellings
where in combination with multi- family dwellings PUD
on the development property meet the district
density goal
Manufactured housing development, park, or
PUD
cooperative
Multi -family projects PUD PUD PUD
Public parks and recreatlon uses P P P P P P P P
Residential accessory uses as further regulated P P P P P P
in this chapter 156.107
Home Occupations P P P P P P 156.102
Commercial Uses
Accessory Buildings T P P 156.040 (H), 156.107
Adult and Sexually oriented businesses as
further regulated in this code
___ -- 110.01- 110.99 _
Veterinary Clinic C 90.01-90.09
Pet Shop C C
90.01
Kennel C
90.01 - 90.09
Automobile and motorized equipment sales and
service, excluding salvage operations
156.30. L,1
Barber /beauty salons P PUD PUD
72
TABLE 156 -A.1 District Allowed Uses 10/212012
O O ry O c e
/..,...////////// O� n Ob �` Oy n' Oy Oy
•
Use Category and Use Type * yro *ho ` ^ h o ^y o ^yo ¢ ^y0 Q Q Y
Commercial Uses
Building Supply sales and storage yards C 156.30. L,3
Business and Professional Offices P P PUD PUD
Car washes P
Commercial schools p
Commercial recreation P C PUD PUD
Construction trade offices and yards P
Day care see Group Living Uses
Day care facility C C C C C P C C
Eating and drinking establishments P PUD PUD
Farm Implement sales and service C 156.30. L,2
Financial institutions P PUD PUD
Fuel sales P C
Funeral homes and mortuaries C
Hospitals C
Hotels and motels P PUD
Liquor stores P PUD PUD
Medical Clinic P PUD PUD
Machine and repair shops inside building only C P
Personal and professional business offices P P PUD PUD
Public buildings C C C C C C P P PUD P
Public utility buildings and structures C C C C C C P P P
Theatres and recreational businesses conducted
within structures. P C PUD
Retail sales and service, but excluding adult- p C PUD PUD
oriented businesses
Industrial Uses
Archery Range P j
1 _
Firearms Shooting Range C
Machine and repair shops P
Manufacturing, processing, assembly except
recycling and waste
Mini- Storage C
Research Facility, excluding animal or livestock P
Truck Terminal C
WarehouselDIstributon P
CODES
Interim Use 1
"1 These references
Permitted Use p are for guidance only
Conditional Use C and are not intended to
include all applicable
Planned Unit Development PUD sections of the code.
73
TABLE 156 -A.1 District Allowed Uses 10/212012 1 1 1 I I
O O O o ;/- � it'''',e O 6° �'� ' o r o h O � Oh ti ��C + Use Category and Use Type ^ ho r... A o ^h o N. A hro Q <2..
Reference:
Procedures for Site Plan Review X X 156.108
Procedures for Conditional Use Permits X X X X X X X X X X X 156.320
Procedures for Planned Unit Developments X X X X 156.200
Procedures for Variances X X X X X X X X X X X 156.310
Landscape and Tree Planing Requirements X X X X X X X X X X X 156.167, 156.168
Fences X X X X X X X X X X X 156.111
Building Height Limits X X X X X X X X X X X 156.121
Yards X X X X X X X X X X X 156.122
Setbacks X X X X X X X X X X X Appendix A, Table 1
Parking Requirements X X X X X X X X X X X 156.166
Other Standards X X X X X X X X X X X 156.144
Outside Storage X X X X X X X X X X X 156.144, (M)
Shoreland Requirements X X X X X X X X X X 156.133
74
Findings and Decision Related to Chapter 156.006 & 156.016 - 156.052
October 2, 2012
Findings and Decision Related to Chapter 156.006 & 156.016- 156.052
The Planning & Zoning Commission met on September 4, 2012 and again on
October 2, 2012, to consider amending the city Code Chapter 156.
Findings:
1) The City Code, Chapter 156 regulates land use and zoning matters.
2) The Commission held a public hearing on September 2, 2012, to consider
amendments to Chapter 156 that would clarify the allowed uses and restate the
allowed uses in the various zoning districts in a chart format. The Commission
considered public comment in making these findings and its decision.
3) The Commission finds that the chart format, identified as Table 156 -A.1 will be
easier to use than the previous method of stating the uses within the text of the
Code.
4) The Commission determined that it should clarify various group residential uses
and day care.
5) The Commission finds that "Residential Care For Juvenile Sex Offenders" is a use
appropriate for the R -3 district, but determines that in order to protect the safety of
children and other vulnerable persons, this use should be located away from places
that children and other vulnerable persons frequently are present. The Commission
determined that an appropriate distance would be 1500 feet from any bike path or
trail, bus stop, school, day care, nursing home, residential facility serving children
or vulnerable persons, public park, recreational use facility, or other public or
private place where children or vulnerable persons would normally frequent or
congregate.
DECISION:
The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends that the City Council adopt the
attached Ordinance amending Chapter 156, including Table 156 -A.1.
Approved by the Planning & Zoning Commission of the City of Centerville on
October 2, 2012
75
Findings and Decision Related to Chapter 156.006 & 156.016 - 156.052
October 2, 2012
Findings and decision approved by the City Council on
2012.
Tom Wilharber, Mayor
Attest:
Teresa Bender, Clerk
76
CITY OF CENTERVILLE
ANOKA COUNTY, MINNESOTA
ORDINANCE #
SECOND SERIES
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CITY CODE CHAPTER 72 REGULATING USE OF
SNOWMOBILES,
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CENTERVILLE ORDAINS:
Section 1. The City Code Chapter 72 is hereby amended to read as follows:
Chapter 72 - SNOWMOBILES
72.01 - APPLICABILITY
This ordinance applies to the operation of snowmobiles on public lands and waters, and
private property within the jurisdiction of the City and on streets and highways within the
boundaries of the City.
72.02 - DEFINITIONS
The words, combination of words, terms or phrases used in this ordinance and
defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 84.81, shall have the meanings given them by that
section.
72.03 - ADOPTION OF STATE LAW BY REFERENCE
The provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Sections 84.82 pertaining to registration, 84.87
pertaining to snowmobile operation and regulations by municipalities, 84.871 pertaining to
equipment requirements, 84.872 pertaining to youthful snowmobile operators, 84.88
pertaining to penalties are adopted and made a part of this ordinance as if set out in full.
72.04 - OPERATION WITHIN THE CITY LIMITS, SNOWMOBILES
A. The City Council, may, from time to time, adopt an official map defining
the boundaries of a No Snowmobile Zone within which snowmobiling, including
recreational riding on your own property, is prohibited in order to protect the
safety of snowmobilers and citizens of the City.
B. Within the City, snowmobiles may be operated for recreational purposes
on:
1. Property you own,
2. Property for which you have written permission in your possession to
ride,
3. Over Centerville Lake and Peltier Lake (when safely iced over), when
legally accessed as defined in this ordinance and not closer than 50 feet
from the shoreline, skating rinks, fish houses, and pedestrians.
C. Within the City of Centerville, travel through the City on a snowmobile may
occur on County Roads and State Highways in a manner which conforms to
County and State regulations. In no case shall travel occur through a
designated No Snowmobile Zone on the above - identified roads or highways.
77
D. For local access to the above - identified through -city travel routes, snowmobiles may
travel on the right hand side of local streets on the paved surface within the
curb line from the operator's place of residence to the travel route via the most
direct route. Any return trip must occur in the same manner. Travel for local
access shall be at a rate not to exceed twenty (20) miles per hour.
Snowmobiles must travel single file in this instance.
E. Additionally, a snowmobile may be operated upon a local street for the sole purpose of
leaving and returning to a place of residence, provided that the travel is limited to the
shortest possible route between the residence and a restaurant or a gasoline filling station.
F. Lakes may be accessed directly from private property, by trailering sleds to a
public boat landing, or via local access as defined above.
72.05 - PROHIBITED USE.
Within the City of Centerville, snowmobiles shall not be operated
A. On public lands, including but not limited to: public parks, playgrounds,
trails, sidewalks, paths, open spaces, scenic and historic sites, cemeteries,
schools, golf courses, and other public buildings and structures.
B . Within fifty (50) feet of any fisherman, fish house, shelter, pedestrian, skating
rink, sliding area or in any other area where such operation would conflict with
the use or endanger other persons or property.
c . At any place, while under the influence of intoxicating liquor, narcotics or
habit - forming drugs
D . At a rate of speed greater than posted for the County Road or Highway, or
reasonable for the surrounding circumstances, and in the case of local
access, not to exceed twenty (20) miles per hour.
E . At any place in a careless, reckless or negligent manner so as to endanger the
person or property of another or to cause injury or damage thereto
72.06 - HOURS OF OPERATION
Snowmobiles shall not be operated between the hours of 12:01 a.m. and 7:00 a.m., except for
emergency purposes or except if the operator is returning to his residence at a speed not in
excess of twenty (20) miles per hour.
72.07 - APPLICATION OF OTHER LAWS
The provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 169, pertaining to traffic regulations, which
relate to the use and operation of snowmobiles, shall apply to the use and operation of
snowmobiles upon the streets and highways of the City. However, those provisions which by
their nature have no application shall not apply.
72.08 -72.98 Sections Reserved for future use.
78
72.99 - PENALTY
Any person violating any provision of this ordinance shall be guilty of a misdemeanor, and
upon conviction thereof, shall be punished by a fine of not more than $1,000.00 or by
imprisonment of not more than ninety (90) days, or both, plus costs of prosecution in either case.
Section 2: Effective Date: This ordinance shall be effective immediately upon its passage and
publication of the attached summary according to law.
SECTION 3. Summary for Publication. The attached "Exhibit A" entitled Summary of
Ordinance , Second Series, is hereby adopted and is hereby ordered to be published in the
official paper.
PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED this day of , 2012 by the City Council of
the City of Centerville.
Tom Wilharber, Mayor
ATTEST:
Teresa Bender, City Clerk
79
Summary of Ordinance _ , Second Series
Notice is hereby given, that on , 2012, Ordinance Number , Second Series,
entitled "AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CITY CODE CHAPTER 72, REGULATING THE
USE OF SNOWMOBILES, was adopted by the City Council of Centerville, Minnesota.
Notice is further given that due to the lengthy nature of the ordinance, the City Council has directed that
this title and summary be prepared for publication pursuant to Minn. Stat. 412.191, Subd. 4.
Notice is further given that a complete printed copy of the ordinance is available for inspection by any
person during normal business hours of the City Clerk, 1880 Main St., Centerville, MN, or will be mailed to anyone
requesting it by telephone (651) 429 -3232.
Notice is further given that the general purpose of the ordinance is to amend the code as to regulating use
of snowmobiles.
Section 1. This section contains the text of a substituting Chapter 72, establishing regulations for the use of
snowmobiles within the city of Centerville.
Section 2. This section provides that the effective date shall be upon publication of this summary.
Notice is further given that the Council has by a 4/5 vote approved this public notice on the day of
, 2011.
Teresa Bender, City Clerk
Published in the Citizen on , 2011.
80
CHAPTER 72: SNOWMOBILES
Section
72.01 Intent
72.02 Definitions
72.03 Application of traffic ordinances
72.04 Restrictions
72.05 Stopping and yielding
72.06 Persons under 18
72.07 Equipment
72.08 Unattended snowmobiles
72.99 Penalty
§ 72.01 INTENT.
It is the intent of this chapter to supplement M.S. §§ 84.81 through 84.88, as amended, and M.S. Chapter 169, as
amended, with respect to the operation of snowmobiles. The statutes are incorporated herein by reference. This
section is not intended to allow what the state statutes prohibit, nor to prohibit what the state statutes allow.
(Ord. #17 -A, adopted 4/24/1991)
§ 72.02 DEFINITIONS.
For the purpose of this chapter, the following definitions shall apply unless the context clearly indicates or
requires a different meaning.
DEADMAN THROTTLE or SAFETY THROTTLE. A device which, when pressure is removed from the
engine accelerator or throttle, causes the motor to be disengaged from the driving mechanism.
OPERATE. To ride in or on and control the operation of a snowmobile.
OPERATOR. Every person who operates or is in actual physical control of a snowmobile.
OWNER. A person, other than a lien holder having the property in or title to a snowmobile, or entitled to the
use or possession thereof.
PERSON. Includes an individual, partnership, corporation, the state and its agencies and subdivision, and any
body of persons, whether incorporated or not.
RIGHT - OF - WAY. The entire strip of land traversed by a highway or street in which the public owns the fee or
an easement for roadway purposes.
ROADWAY. The portion of a highway or street improved, designed or ordinarily used for vehicular travel.
SNOWMOBILE. A self - propelled vehicle designed for travel on snow or ice, steered by skis or runners.
STREET. A public thoroughfarc, roadway, alley or trail uscd for motor vehicular traffic which is not an
interstate, trunk, county -state aid or county highway.
(Ord. #17-A, adopted 4/24/1991)
§ 72.03 APPLICATION OF TRAFFIC ORDINANCES.
81
City traffic ordinances shall apply to the operation of snowmobiles upon streets and highways, except for those
relating to required equipment, and except those which by their nature have no application.
(Ord. #17-A, adopted 4/24/1991)
§ 72.04 RESTRICTIONS.
(A) It is unlawful for any person to enter, operate or stop a snowmobile within the limits of the city:
(1) On the roadway of any street, except the most right -hand lane then available for traffic or as close as
practicable to right -hand curb or edge of the roadway, except when overtaking and passing another vehicle stopped
in the lane or proceeding in the same direction, or in making a left turn. Snowmobiles may also be operated upon the
outside slope of trunk, county -state aid and county highways where the highways are so configured within the
corporate limits;
(2) On a public sidewalk provided for pedestrian travel;
(3) On boulevards within any public right -of -way;
(4) On private property of another without specific permission of the owner or person in control of that
property;
(5) Upon any school grounds, except as permission is expressly obtained from responsible school
authorities;
(6) (a) On public property, playgrounds and recreation areas, except areas previously listed or authorized
for that use by the city, in which case the use shall be lawful, and snowmobiles may be driven in and out of the areas
by the shortest route.
(b) Authorized areas in the city shall be designated by resolution of the City Council.
(7) On streets as permitted by this chapter at a speed exceeding ten mph;
(8) During the hours of 10:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m., Sunday through Thursday, and 12:01 a.m. to 7:00 a.m.,
Friday and Saturday, and from 12:01 a.m. to 7:00 a.m. Permitted hours of operation on the day before Thanksgiving,
Christmas and New Years Day shall be the same as a Friday;
(9) (a) Within 200 feet of church property during the hours of church services, and during the hours of
other church functions.
(b) This provision is not intended to prohibit snowmobiles from operating on city streets adjacent to
church property during the hours specified herein.
(10) Along or upon any roadway except for the sole purpose of leaving and returning to a place of
residence, provided that the travel is limited to the shortest possible route between the residence and a restaurant or a
gasoline filling station or between a residence and a place where a snowmobile may be legally used; and
(11) On any street or public property when the drive track is equipped with metal studs.
(B) It is unlawful for any person to operate a snowmobile within the limits of the city:
82
(1) So as to tow any person or thing in a public street or highway except through use of a rigid tow bar
attached to the rear of the snowmobile; provided, that a disabled snowmobile may be towed to a private residence
without the use of a rigid tow bar; or
(2) Within 100 feet of any fisherman, pedestrian, skating rink or sliding arca where the operation would
conflict with use or endanger other persons or operation.
(Ord. #17 -A, adopted 4/24/1991, Ord. #87, amended 10/12/2005) Penalty, see § 72.99
§ 72.05 STOPPING AND YIELDING.
(A) No snowmobile shall enter any uncontrolled intersection without making a complete stop.
(B) The operator shall then yield the right -of -way to any vehicles or pedestrians at the intersection, or so close
to the intersection as to constitute an immediate hazard.
(Ord. #17 -A, adopted 4/24/1991) Penalty, see § 72.99
§ 72.06 PERSONS UNDER 18.
(A) No person under 14 years of age shall operate on streets or make a direct crossing of a city street as the
operator of a snowmobile. A person 14 years of age or older, but less than 18 years of age, may operate a
snowmobile on streets as permitted under this chapter and make a direct crossing of streets only if he or she has in
his or her immediate possession a valid snowmobile safety certificate issued by the Commissioner of Natural
Resources, as provided by M.S. § 84.86, as it may be amended.
(B) It is unlawful for the owner of a snowmobile to permit the snowmobile to be operated contrary to the
provision of this section.
(Ord. #17 -A, adopted 4/24/1991) Penalty, see § 72.99
§ 72.07 EQUIPMENT.
It is unlawful for any person to operate a snowmobile any place within the limits of the city unless it is equipped
with the following:
(A) Brakes adequate to control the movement of and to stop and hold the snowmobile under any condition of
operation;
(B) A safety or so- called deadman throttle in operating condition;
(C) When operated between the hours of one -half hour after sunset to one -half hour before sunrise, or at times
of reduced visibility, at least one clear lamp attached to the front, with sufficient intensity to reveal persons and
vehicles at a distance of at least 100 feet ahead during the hours of darkness under normal atmospheric conditions.
The head lamp shall be so aimed that glaring rays are not projected into the eyes of an oncoming snowmobile
operator. It shall also be equipped with at least one red light plainly visible from a distance of 500 feet to the rear
during hours of darkness under normal atmospheric conditions; and
(D) Reflective material at least 16 square inches on each side, forward of the handlebars, so as to reflect lights
at a 90- degree angle.
(Ord. #17-A, adopted 4/24/1991) Penalty, see § 72.99
§ 72.08 UNATTENDED SNOWMOBILES.
83
Every person leaving a snowmobile on a public place shall lock the ignition, remove the key and take the same
with him or her.
(Ord. #17 -A, adopted 4/24/1991) Penalty, see § 72.99
§ 72.99 PENALTY.
Any person who violates, disobeys, omits, neglects or refuses to comply with the provisions of this chapter shall
be guilty of a petty misdemeanor and upon conviction shall be punished as defined by state law.
(Ord. #17 -A, adopted 4/24/1991)
84
CITY OF CENTERVILLE
4 • r MONTHLY ENGINEER'S REPORT
` ter vtlte For the October 10, 2012 City Council Meeting
., .IaIi(Lchild rcti� {
Italics = New information.
Normal = No change from last report.
1. TE Grant Trail Project (000616- 08165 -0). Final payment paperwork is being processed with the
County.
We are exploring alternatives to mitigate wetland impacts beyond those initially permitted under the
project.
We are addressing some pay quantity discrepancies with the Contractor's concrete subcontractor.
2. 2008 Downtown Storm Water Improvements (000616- 08167 -0). A record plan of the project
is being produced.
3. 2012 Surface Water Management Plan Update (193802237). The plan has been completed and
will be accepted by the Rice Creek Watershed District on October 10 The City Council should also
formally adopt the plan.
4. 2013 Street and Utility Improvements (193801520). A draft of the Feasibility Report will be
discussed at the City Council workshop on the 10 We will also be on hand to discuss the comments
heard at the Project Open House, held on October 3"
5. Miscellaneous:
• City Staff again met with Anoka County staff and discussed the design of improvements to
Centerville Road (CSAH 21). The City will need to let Anoka County know their preference on a
few items, including our intentions with regard to streetscaping and other improvements on
Centerville Road between Heritage St. and Main Street. The p /an is taking shape and will be
ready for public input in late 2012 or early 2013.
85
•
•
— . e
11 :30 a.m. • 2:15 p.m. 4 p.m. . '`.• ` NOVEMBER 14
Metropolitan Area Management • ,.' The Latest in Local Election Administration Remarks from Metro Cities '...\
Association Luncheon Joe Mansky, Elections Manager, Ramsey County President Mark Sather and , RAMADA PLAZA
You must RSVP to attend this luncheon by This fall's elections could bring about significant LMC President Betsy Hodges MINNEAPOLIS
contacting Laurie Jennings at changes in how elections are administered in
Laurie@ MetroCitiesMN ,orgor(651)2154004. Minnesota. An elections expert will discuss the 4:15 p.m. REGISTRATION FEE:
A separate fee of $20 applies. impacts of the proposed photo ID constitutional Metro Cities Policy Adoption Meeting $40 PER PERSON
David Schultz, Professor, amendment on cities and counties —as well as share
Hemline University School of Business his observations on the issues that will need to be 5 p.m. (DINNER INCLUDED)
Hear from a nationally - recognized expert on political decided by the 2013 Legislature, if this measure Social Hour with Cash Bar
ethics, campaign finance, and civic engagement basses in November. REGISTER NOW:
about the outcomes of the 2012 elections and what 6 p.m. WWW.LMC.ORG /2012RM
it means for cities going forward. 3 p.m. Dinner with Guest Speakers
Break Torn Scheck, Political Reporter, Minnesota Pubi'
SPONSORED BY:
1 p.m. Radio and Rachel Stassen- Berger, Political
Registration Open 3 p Reporter, Star Tribune E H L E RS
Metropolitan Council Thrive MSP 2040 Hear from seasoned political commentators about
1:30 p.m. Metropolitan Council Officials their reflections on the 2012 elections, as weft LEADERS IN PUBLIC FINANCE
Educating and Integrating Thrive MSP is a long -range planning initiative that as their Insights into what Minnesota's political
New Councilmembers will establish a regional vision for the seven- landscape will look like in 2013 and beyond.
League of Minnesota Cities Staff county metropolitan area for the next 30 years.
Find out what the Metropolitan Council has 7:30 p.m.
With the elections in November, most Minnesota learned from residents, business owners, local
cities will see a few—or even a lot—of new faces on officials, and community leaders in its Thrive MSP Adjourn METRO O
their councils. League staff and city colleagues will listening sessions, and what the next steps are for CITIES
share tips on successful ways to get new members developing this new regional framework. J oe
M
both in the know and on the team. CITIES
Ail '111 __._.,i
. _ . . . .._...
•
Z
0
U3
CD
w
CC
0
91.10 - Social host.
(A) Purpose and findings. The city council seeks to reduce underage possession and consumption
of alcohol by imposing criminal penalties on those person(s) who host events or gatherings where persons
under twenty -one (21) years of age possess or consume alcohol.
The city council finds that:
(1) Alcohol is an addictive drug, which, if used irresponsibly, could have drastic
effects on those who use it as well as those who are affected by the actions of the
irresponsible user.
(2) Events and gatherings held on private or public property where alcohol is
possessed or consumed by persons under the age of twenty -one (21) are harmful to those
persons and constitute a potential threat to public health, safety and welfare requiring
prevention or abatement.
(3) Holding persons criminally responsible for hosting or permitting an event or
gathering where underage possession or consumption of alcohol occurs will help deter
underage consumption.
(B) Definitions.
(1) Alcohol means ethyl alcohol, hydrated oxide of ethyl or spirits of wine, liqueur,
cordials, whiskey, rum, brandy, gin, or any other distilled spirits including dilutions and
mixtures thereof from whatever source or by whatever process produced.
(2) Alcoholic beverage means alcohol, spirits, liquor, wine, beer, and every liquid or
solid containing alcohol, spirits, wine or beer and which contains one -half ('A) of one (1)
percent or more of alcohol by volume and which is fit for beverage purposes either alone
or when diluted, mixed or combined with other substances.
(3) Adult means any person eighteen (18) years of age or older.
(4) Underage person means any person under the age of twenty -one (21) years.
(5) Parent means any person having legal custody of a juvenile as a natural parent,
adoptive parent, step parent, legal guardian, or a person to whom legal custody has been
given by order of the court.
(6) Person means any individual, partnership, co- partnership, corporation, or any
association of one (1) or more individuals.
1
(7) Host means to permit, aid, conduct, sponsor, organize, control, tolerate, or allow
an event or gathering.
(8) Event or gathering means any group of three (3) or more persons who have
assembled or gathered together for a social occasion or other activity. An event or
gathering shall not include assemblies or gatherings occurring on the licensed property of
a retail intoxicating liquor or three and two - tenths (3.2) percent malt liquor licensee,
municipal liquor store, or bottle club permit holder who is regulated by Minn. Stat. §
340A.503.
(9) Residence or premises means any home, yard, field, land, apartment,
condominium, hotel or motel room, or other dwelling unit, or a hall or meeting room,
park or any other place of assembly, public or private, whether occupied on a temporary
or permanent basis, whether occupied as a dwelling or specifically for a party or other
social function, and whether owned, leased, rented, or used with or without permission or
compensation.
(C) Prohibited acts.
(1) It is unlawful for any person(s) to:
(a) Host an event or gathering;
(b) At any residence, premises, or on any other private or public property;
(c) Where alcohol or alcoholic beverages are present;
(e) Where an underage person consumes an alcoholic beverage, or possesses
an alcoholic beverage with the intent to consume it, at the gathering, and
(d) Fails to take reasonable steps to prevent the possession or consumption
of alcoholic beverages by an underage person.* See Alternative Text re:
"reasonable steps, " below.
(2) It is a violation of section (c) if the person intentionally aids, advises, hires,
counsels, or conspires with another or otherwise procures another to commit the
prohibited act.
(3) A person who hosts an event or gathering does not have to be present at the event
or gathering to be criminally responsible for a violation of section (c).
2
(D) Penalty. A violation of this section is a misdemeanor.
(E) Exceptions.
(1) It shall be an affirmative defense to a violation of section (c) that the defendant is
the parent of the underage person and that the defendant gave or furnished the alcoholic
beverage to that person solely for consumption in the defendant's household.
(2) It shall be an affirmative defense to a violation of section (c) that the conduct was
part of a legally protected religious observance.
(F) Severability. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, part, provision, phrase, word, or
other portion of this section is, for any reason, held to be unconstitutional or invalid, in whole or
in part by any court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed severable, and such
unconstitutionality or invalidity shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this
chapter, which remaining portions shall continue in full force and effect.
ALTERNATIVE TEXT- TAKE FROM MINNETONKA ORDINANCE
(This text was inserted to alleviate concerns that parents would unknowingly be targeted by
enforcement of the ordinance)
(C)(2) Examples of reasonable steps include:
(a) Directing, on a one -time basis or as a standing order, that no consumption of alcohol
g p
and alcoholic beverages is allowed;
(b) Controlling access to alcohol and alcoholic beverages;
(c) Checking identification of attendees to determine age; or
(d) Supervising the activities of underage persons at the gathering either in person or
through a responsible adult.
3
CITY OF CENTERVILLE
ORDINANCE # . Second Series { Deleted: 52
An ordinance adopting a fee schedule for 2013 { Deleted: 2
THE CITY OF CENTERVILLE ORDAINS:
Section 1. The following rates for, permits, licenses and other charges are approved:
Reference FEE
Chapter 50
Utility fees, Charges, Storm Water Area Charge and Other Costs
See Exhibit "A"
Chapter 90
Animal License ( §90.02)
Kennel License $30.00
Dangerous/Potentially Dangerous Dog Registration $30.00/Year
Animal At -Large Release Fee ( §90.06)
Violation $50.00
Chapter 91
Burning Permit $50.00 ( §91.25)
Administration Fees Associated with Meth. Lab Clean -up
$5,000.00 ( §91.45)
Plus Costs Incurred for Clean -up ( 01.53)
Chapter 93
Right -of -Way Usage Fees: ( §93.20)
Right -of -Way Excavating Permit or Street Breaking Permit $75.00 ( §93.20)
(Includes New Driveway(s))
Right -of -Way Excavating Permit/Existing Driveway Replacement$25.00
Obstruction Fee $150.00
Penalty/Fine work in ROW without securing permit $300.00
Restoration Cost Equal to City Cost
Deposit for restoration collected with permit per estimate of P.W. Director
Note Regarding Chapters 110, 112 - 119
Initial license for Chapters 110, 112 -119 shall be pro -rated per quarter (not less than 1 quarter) and no
refunds will be made if the business should cease the licensed activity.
Chapter 110
Page l of 16
4
Adult Establishment License $4,000.00 (§110.08)
Application/Background Check $500.00
Chapter 111
Liquor Licenses:
3.2 Beer Permit — Special Events $35.00 plus $5.00 for each (§111.08)
add'l day
Application/Background Check (New Licensee) $500.00
Off -Sale Liquor $100.00
Off -Sale Non - Intoxication Liquor $20.00
On -Sale Liquor:
Based on square footage $.60 per sq ft of interior
$.30 per sq ft for exterior
Minimum $2,500.00
Maximum $4,000.00
Brew Pub $500.00
On -Sale 3.2 Liquor $250.00
Sunday Liquor License $200.00
Wine License $300.00
Chapter 112
Pawn Broker License $2,000.00 (§112.03)
Application/Background Check $500.00
Chapter 113
Transient Sales:
Application/Background Check $80.00 ( §113.03)
Per Day $10.00 ( §113.03)
Per Month $60.00 (§113.03)
Chapter 114
Tattoo, Body Piercing, Permanent Cosmetic Make -Up, Body Branding
and Body Painting Establishment License $270.00 ( §114.07)
Application/Background Check $80.00
Chapter 115
Sauna(s), Dayspa or Massage Business License $270.00 (§115.17)
(Includes Therapist Certificate Fee for Owner(s))
Massage Therapist Certification $85.00 ( §115.32)
Application/Background Check $80.00
Massage Therapist Renewal /Annual Certificate $55.00 (§115.32)
Chapter 116
Cigarette License -sale of tobacco products $85.00 (§116.04)
Application/Background Check $80.00
Tobacco Violation (1 Violation) $250.00 ( §116.99)
(2 Violation) $500.00
(3 Violation) $750.00
Page 2 of 16
5
Chapter 117
Sale of Fireworks License $100.00 (§117.06)
Chapter 118
Rental License -2 Year Period $110.00 for 1 unit/$25.00 per (§118.03)
unit thereafter within the
same structure
Rental Reinspection Fee (3 Visit) $40.00 per unit
Chapter 119
Commercial Rubbish Collection License Fee $300.00 ( §119.01, A 5)
Chapter 120
License for water and /or sewer service line installer $100.00 /yr.
Chapter 121
Dance:
Single Event $20.00 + Police Fees (§121.02)
Yearly- Continuous $200.00 + Police Fees
Chapter 130
Bingo Permit $20.00 (§130.19)
Chapter 150
Building Permits See Exhibit `B"
Plumbing Permits See Exhibit "C"
Electrical Permit Fees See Exhibit "D"
Demolition Permit & Escrow:
Residential (not required for accessory bldgs. <120 sq. ft.) .$200.00 ( §150.01)
Escrow $2,000.00 or Letter of Credit
Commercial /Industrial Valuation Based w/Minimum
Of $300.00
Escrow 20% of Demo. Cost
Permit Surcharge Per State of MN
Building Move $500.00
Building Move Deposit (for street repairs and site restoration) $3,000.00
Chapter 152
Sign Permit Fee:
Wall- mounted sign $75.00
Free - standing sign (In addition to building permit) $75.00
Chapter 153
Park Dedication Fees
Land Dedication ( §153.15)
At option of City -10% of Fair market Value of all property located in the proposed
development or $3,000 /unit (whichever is greater)
Page 3 of 16
6
Commercial /Industrial $2,175.00 /acre
Lot Split/Lot Combination $200.00 plus legal fees + park fees, if split
Preliminary Plat Fee — Application $500.00 + deposit of $100.00/Lot or Unit
(City Review will cease if costs exceed fees and deposit is not replenished)
Chapter 156
Bridges in easement
Encroachment Agreement $100.00 + Recording Fees (§154.132)
Annual Insurance Monitoring & Inspection $25.00
Fence Permit $60.00
In Easement — Requires Council Action and Encroach. Agr.$100.00 + Recording Fees
PUD Application (§156.251) $500.00 + deposit of $100.00/Lot or Unit
(City Review will cease if costs exceed deposit and deposit is not replenished)
Variance Application (§156.310) $250.00 + deposit of $500.00
(City Review will cease if costs exceed deposit and deposit is not replenished)
Conditional or Interim Use Permit Application (§156.320) $250.00 + deposit of $500.00
(City Review will cease if costs exceed deposit and deposit is not replenished)
Rezoning Requests (§156.410) $250.00 + deposit of $500.00
(City Review will cease if costs exceed deposit and deposit is not replenished)
Site Plan Review $250.00 + deposit of $500.00
(City Review will cease if costs exceed deposit and deposit is not replenished)
Comprehensive Plan Amendment - Applicant will pay all costs associated with amendment -
$250.00 + deposit of $500.00
(City Review will cease if costs exceed deposit and deposit is not replenished)
Chapter 155 -same as Chapter 156 procedure fees
Chapter 157
Fill Permit & Grading Permits See Exhibit "E"
Site Maintenance Deposit/Erosion Control/Landscape /Sod/Driveway Escrow
$5,000 ( §157.15, B)(150.045 & (154.410)
(May substitute letter of credit)
Land Development Minimum $5,000.00
(Addressed in Developer's Agreement)
OTHER FEES:
Assessment Certificate $45.00
Base Map Updating Fee (New Plat) $40.00/Lot (Developer's Agree.)
Page 4 of 16
(Minimum of $500)
Council Chamber Rental Must be non - profit organization — No Charge + Other Charges,
Organizational Structure Dependent
Security Deposit (City Policy- 08/05) $150.00
Filing Fees $2.00
Maps and Charts (24" x 36 ") $15.00
Non - Sufficient Funds/Returned Check $30.00
Notary Fees $1.00 /item
On -Line Payment Convenience Fee $3.99 /transaction
Park Use Field Prep., Trash pickup, lighting, concession
facility, will be determined by P.W. Dir. (Min.
Deposit $100.00)
Photo Copies $.25 per page (one sided)
Public Works Labor & Equipment Cost + 30%
Research Charge $40.00 half hour minimum
$60.00 for each hour thereafter
Special Event Permit $50.00
Street Vacation Request $500.00 (review and hearing costs)
Section 2. The attached summary ordinance: Exhibit "F" "Summary of Ordinance for
Publication" is hereby adopted.
Section 3. These fees shall become effective on publication of the attached summary of
ordinance.
Adopted by the City Council this day of December,
Tom Wilharber, Mayor
ATTEST:
Teresa Bender, City Clerk
Page 5 of 16
8
EXHIBIT A
UTILITY FFES, CHARGES AND OTHER COSTS
Sewer trunk system fee (Residential Equivalent Unit) $2,250.00 ( §51.07)
Sewer Availability Charge (SAC)/ $2435.00 ( §51.07) - -{ Deleted: 365 j
Water (WAC)/Trunk System Fee (Residential Equivalent Unit) $1,800.00 ( §51.07)
Water Access Charge (Unassessed properties) $6,350.00
Sanitary Sewer Access Charge ( Unassessed properties) $7,800.00
Storm Water Area Charge (Developer's Agreement) .05739 per square foot ( §51.11)
Residential - drainage area permit with building permit $350/Unit
Commercial/Industrial $.07 per square foot of building,
parking and other impervious surfaces
Water /Sewer Permit Fees (651.07)
Service /Connection (Includes 2 inspection trips to site $75.00
Tapping Main $50.00
Curb Stop Activation $75.00
Inspections (A11) /each $40.00
Service Charges - Meters
Testing Cost
Water Meter Purchase or Deposit (651.05, H)
3/4" Meter ✓ $400.00 Deleted: $125.00 + 20%
1" Meter
,$500 00 { Deleted: $172.00 +20 %¶
Minor Repairs Cost + 20%
Special and other sizes Cost plus Handling
(These Rates are Subject to Tax)
Water Test Fee $6.36 (7/1/06)
Water Usage Rates ( §51.02)
Residential
Water System Management Fee/Qtrly. Billing Period $21.00
Variable — Rate Per Thousand Gallons /Qtr. (0- 90,000) $2.00
Variable — Rate Per Thousand Gallons /Qtr. (90,001 - 150,000) $2.20
Variable — Rate Per Thousand Gallons /Qtr. (150,001 -XXX) $2.50
Commercial
Water System Management Fee /Qtrly. Billing Period $21.00
Variable — Rate Per Thousand Gallons /Qtr. (0- 500,000) $2.00
Variable — Rate Per Thousand Gallons /Qtr. (500,001 -XXX) $2.50
Sewer/Wastewater fee (quarterly) per REU $65.00
Storm Water Management Fee (quarterly): ( §51.11)
Residential (Fixed) $12.00
Comm. /Industrial (Fixed) $0.00344 /sq. ft impervious with minimum...$12.50
Utilities /(Water /Sewer /Garbage Billing) Penalties & Late Fees
Residential/Commercial Penalty /Late Payment 6% Qtrly On Delinquent Balance
Page 6 of 16
9
1 Utilities /(Water /Sewer /Garbage Certification) 5% of Outstanding Balance or $50.00 whichever is greater
( §50.03)
Utility billing is billed on a quarterly basis for the previous three months
Use of Meter & Hydrant (51.09, J)
Meter Rental ................................. ............................... 50.00 /day ----{ Deleted: 100
$1,000.00D Sit Deleted: (3 days charge if exceeds 3
� days $100.00 per r day)
$25.00Connection Fee
$4.00/1,000 Gallons
Page 7 of 16
10
EXHIBIT B
BUILDING PERMIT FEES
TOTAL VALUATION FEE
1 Driveway $25.00
Accessory Structures Under 120 sq ft.
(Zoning Use Permit) $60.00
Easement Encroachment Agreement $100.00 + Recording Fees
(Requires Council Action — Not Allowed if exceeds 120 sq. ft.)
Basement (Finishing) (Plumb. & Mech. Included if Rough -In Complete)
$145.00
Permanent Pools, Deleted: greater than 5,000 gallons or
Inground $345.00 side walls greater than 24 inches:
Above Ground $145.00
(Both plumbing and mechanical included)
Roof /Re -Roof — 1 or 2 family only $145.00
Siding (Lap, Wood, Metal, Vinyl & Composite)
1 or 2 family only $145.00
(Excludes Stucco, Brick & Other Masonry Products)
1 $1.00 TO $1,000,00 55.00 ...{ Deleted: 500
31,1 00.00 TO $2,000.00 455.06, For the first $ $4.01 for {Deleted' 31
each additional $100.00 or fraction ^.• , D eleted: 5 01
thereof, to and including $2,000.00 Deleted: 31
Deleted: .00
$2,001.00 to $25,000.00 $91.00 For the first $2,000.00 plus 18.38
for each additional $1,000.00, or Deleted: 500
fraction thereof, to and including
$25,000.00
25,001.00 to $50,000.00 $513.75 For the first $25,000.00 plus $13.26
for each additional $1,000.00 or
fraction thereof, to and including
$50,000.00
$50,001.00 to $100,000.00 $845.20 For the first $50,000.00 plus $9.19
for each additional $1,000.00, or
fraction thereof, to and including
$100,000.00
$100,001.00 to $500,000.00 $1,304.57 For the first $100,000.00 plus $7.35
for each additional $1,000.00, or
fraction thereof, and including
$500,000.00
$500.001.00 to $1.000,000.00 $4,244.57 For the first $500,000.00 plus
$6.24 for each additional
$1,000.00, or fraction
thereof, to and including
$1,000,000.00
$1,000,001.00 and up $7,361.49 For the first $1,000,000.00
Page 8 of 16
F
11
plus $4.79 for each additional
$1,000.00, or fraction thereof
Other Inspections and Fees:
1. Inspections outside of normal business hours
(minimum charge — two (2) hours) $90.00 per hour
•
2. Reinspection fees assessed under provisions
of Section 305.8 $70.00 per hour
3. Inspections for which no fee is specifically
indicated $70.00 per hour
Plan Review = 65% of permit
CommerciaVIndustrial $500.00 deposit required when plan submitted for review.
Page 9 of 16
12
EXHIBIT C
PLUMBING AND HEATING PERMITS
1. Plumbing Permits
A. The charge shall be five dollars ($5.00) for each plumbing fixture, device or connection to the
sewer or plumbing system, with a minimum charge of forty dollars and zero cents ($40.00)
B. For any alteration, repair or extension to an existing plumbing system, where the work is of
such a nature that the permit fee charge cannot be determined from the above schedule, the
permit fee shall be forty dollars ($40.00) first five- hundred dollars ($500.00) or fraction
thereof, plus fifteen dollars ($15.00) for each additional five- hundred dollars ($500.00) or
fraction thereof of the total market value of such alteration, repair or extension.
The charge for commercial, industrial or institutionalplumbing shall be: { Deleted: building 3
Two percent (2 %) of the total cost of labor and materials or a minimum of S40.00 whichever - -- Deleted: of the heating, ventilation and
is greater. air conditioning work to be completed
Work commenced without first obtaining a permit shall be charged an investigative fee equal to permit
fees.
2. Mechanical Permits
The charge for a residential dwelling shall be twenty dollars and zero cents ($20.00) for each
of the following units but not to exceed $140.00. A minimum charge of forty dollars and zero
cents ($40.00):
• Main Gas Line Piping
• Gas Furnace
• Air conditioner
• Boiler
• Air Exchanger
• Gas Fireplace /Gas Log (Install in regular fireplace)
• Gas Boiler
• Gas Dryer
• Gas Stove /Range
• Wood Fireplace
• Duct Work
• Miscellaneous Mechanical Fixtures
• Gas Pool Heater
• Gas Wall Heater /Garage Heater
The charge for commercial, industrial or institutional building shall be:
Two percent (2 %) of the total cost of labor and materials of the heating, ventilation and air
conditioning work to be completed or a minimum of $40.00 whichever is greater.
•
Work commenced without first obtaining a permit shall be charged an investigative fee
equal to permit fees, in addition to normal permit fees.
Sprinkler /Fire Suppression system permits:
Single Family, Flat fee of $400.00
Fire Suppression Permit Minimum $75.00
Page 10 of 16
13
Other sprinkler /fire suppression permits. Contract cost of sprinkler /fire suppression system
times 3.25% (Includes plan review by Building Official and Fire Department).
All of the above stated fees are Subject to State of MN surcharge fees.
Page 11 of 16
14
EXHIBIT D
ELECTRICAL FEES
Individual/separate inspection (installation, replacement, alteration or repair) $45.00
Services, generators, feeders to separate structures and other power supply resources:
1. 0 ampere to and including 200 ampere capacity $45.00
2. Each additional 100 amps or fraction thereof an add'l $10.00
3. For services and circuits operating at over 250 volts (Scheduled fee doubles)
Circuits, feeders, feeder taps, or sets of transformer secondary conductors:
1. 0 ampere to and including 30 ampere capacity $8.00
2. 31 amps to 100 amps $10.00 ea.
3. Each additional 100 amps an add'l $5.00
One - Family dwelling and each dwelling unit of a two - family dwelling $175.00
Up to and including 200 amps service (includes not more than three inspections)
Multifamily dwellings $100.00
Each existing circuits or feeders reconnected to replacement panels (new or extended circuits or feeders at the
above fees) $3.00
Electrical supply for each manufactured home park lot $45.00
Recreational vehicle site, electrical supply equipment $10.00 ea.
Street, parking lot or outdoor area lighting standards $8.00
Transformers for light, heat and power:
1. Up to and including 10 kilo -volt amps $20.00 ea.
2. Over 10 kilo -volt amps $40.00 ea.
Transformers and electronic power supplies for electric signs and outline lighting $8.00
Swimming pool bonding inspection (each separate inspection) $45.00
(Bonding conductors and connections require an inspection before being concealed)
Retrofit modifications to existing lighting fixtures $.50 /fixture
Transient Projects - Power supply fees as identified above, plus 1 hour $90.00/hour
Each attraction or concession inspection $45.00
Special inspection or inspections not covered above the fee is $90.00 per hour plus mileage at the rate
established per the IRS.
Re- inspection fee when inspection is necessary to determine whether the unsafe conditions have been corrected
— a fee will be assessed by the inspector $45.00
Minimum Fee per Trip $45.00
*Electrical work commenced without filing the required permit, in addition to the permit fee, shall pay two
times the permit fee, not to exceed $1,000. *For purposes of interpretation, Minnesota Rules, Chapter 3800,
Page 12 of 16
15
and the most recently adopted edition of the National Electric Code shall be prima facie evidence of the
definitions, interpretations, and scope of words and terms used.
Requests for Electrical Inspection (REI) with a fee of $250 or less expires 12 months from the filing date. The
contractor must have the work completed within the 12 -month period or submit another REI that includes the
inspection fee for the uncompleted work. Inspection fees do not carry over from one REI to another.
Subject to State of MN surcharge fees.
Page 13 of 16
16
EXHIBIT E
LANDFILL, GRADING AND EXCAVATING PERMIT FEES
GRADING FEES
General. Fees shall be assessed in accordance with the provisions of this section or shall be as set forth
in the fee schedule adopted by the jurisdiction.
Plan Review Fees. When a plan or other data are required to be submitted, a plan review fee shall be
paid at the time of submitting plans and.specifications for review. Said plan review fee shall be set forth in
Table A33 -A. Separate plan review fees shall apply to retaining walls or major drainage structures as required
elsewhere in this code. For excavation and fill on the same site, the fee shall be based on the volume of
excavation or fill, whichever is greater.
Grading Permit Fees. A fee for each grading permit shall be paid to the City as set forth in Table A33 -B.
Separate permits and fees shall apply to retaining walls or major drainage structures as required elsewhere in
this code. There shall be no separate charge for standard terrace drains and similar facilities.
TABLE A33 -A GRADING PLAN REVIEW FEES
50 cubic yards (38.2 m3) or less No Fee
51 to 100 cubic yards (40 m3 to 76.5 m3) $37.01
101 to 1,000 cubic yards (77.2 m3 to 764.6 m3) $58.28
1,001 to 10,000 cubic yards (765.3 m3 to 7645.5 m3) $77.57
10,001 to 100,000 cubic yards (7646.3 to 7645.5 m3) - $77.57 for the first
10,000 cubic yards (7645.5 m3), plus $38.59 for each additional
10,000 cubic yards (7645.5 m3) or fraction thereof.
100,001 to 200,000 cubic yards (7645.6 m3 to 15,291.1 m3) - $424.86 for the
first 100,000 cubic yards (7645.5 m3), plus $20.87 for each additional
10,000 cubic yards (7645.5 m3) or fraction thereof.
200,001 cubic yards (15,291.2 m3) or more - $633.55 for the first $200,000 cubic
yards (15,291.1 m3), plus $11.42 for each additional 10,000 cubic years
(7645.5 m3) or fraction thereof.
Other Fees:
Additional plan review required by changes, additions or revisions to approved plans
(minimum charge - one -half hour) $79.54 per hour*
*Or the total hourly cost to the jurisdiction, whichever is the greatest. This cost shall include supervision,
overhead, equipment, hourly wages and fringe benefits of the employees involved.
TABLE A33B - GRADING PERMIT FEES*
0 to 100 cubic yards (40 m3 to 76.5 m3) $60.00
101 to 1,000 cubic yards (77.2 m3 to 764.6 m3) - $60.00 for the first 100 cubic yards
(76.5 m3), plus $27.56 for each additional 100 cubic yards (76.5 m3) or fraction
thereof.
1,001 to 10,000 cubic yards (765.3 m3 to 7,645.5 m3) - $308.04 for the first 1,000
cubic yards (764.6 m3), plus $22.84 for each additional 1,000 cubic yards
(764.6 m3) or fraction thereof.
10,001 to 100,000 cubic yards (7,646.3 m3 to 7,645.5 m3) - $513.60 for the first 10,000
cubic yards (7,645.5 m3), plus $103.95 for each additional 10,000 cubic yards
(7,645.5 m3) or fraction thereof.
100,001 cubic yards (7,645.6 m3) or more - $1,449.15 for the first 100,000 cubic yards
(7,645.5 m3), plus $57.49 for each additional 10,000 cubic yards (7,645.5 m3)
Page 14 of 16
17
or fraction thereof.
Other Inspections and Fees:
1. Inspections outside of normal business hours $90.00 per hour
(minimum charge — two hours)
2. Reinspection fees assessed under provision of Section 108.8 $70.00 per hour
3. Inspections for which no fee is specifically indicated $70.00 per hour
(minimum charge — one -half hour)
*The fee for a grading permit authorizing additional work to that under a valid permit shall be the difference
between the fee paid for the original permit and the fee shown for the entire project.
* *Or the total hourly cost to the jurisdiction, whichever is the greatest. This cost shall include supervision,
overhead, equipment, hourly wages and fringe benefits of the employees involved.
Page 15 of 16
18
EXHIBIT F
CITY OF CENTERVILLE
Anoka County, Minnesota
SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE #, , SECOND SERIES - { Deleted: 52 j
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that, on .Dateb, Ordinance #_. Second Series, entitled "AN - -{ Deleted: December 14, 2011 )
ORDINANCE ADOPTING A FEE SCHEDULE FOR 201 was adopted by the City Council of the { Deleted: 52
City of Centerville, Minnesota
f Deleted: 2
NOTICE IS FURTHER GIVEN that, because of the lengthy nature of Ordinance 1, -{ Deleted: 52
Second Series the City Council has directed that a title and summary be prepared for publication pursuant
to Minn. Stat. 412.191, Subd 4.
NOTICE IS FURTHER GIVEN that a complete, printed copy of Ordinance #i Second . - { Deleted: 52 )
Series is available for inspection by any person during regular office hours at the office of the City Clerk,
1880 Main Street, Centerville, MN, or will be mailed to anyone requesting it by telephone (651) 429-
3232.
NOTICE IS FURTHER GIVEN that the general purpose of the ordinance is to adopt fees and
charges for various purposes.
Section 1.
This section adopts fees and charges including fees related to garbage/utility account
certification, utility rates and charges, animal licensing, buming permits, fees for use of right -of -ways and
excavations in streets, fees for business licensing, fees and deposits related building activities, fees for
sign permits, development fees including fees in lieu of park dedications, planning and zoning fees, and
fees for services including supplying copies and maps, and fees for vacation of streets and easements.
Section 2.
This section authorizes this summary of the ordinance be published in lieu of the entire text of
the ordinance.
Section 3.
This section provides that the ordinance is effective on publication of this summary.
NOTICE IS FURTHER GIVEN that the City Council has by at least a 4/5 vote, approved this
Public Notice.
APPROVED this th day of, { Deleted_ 14th )
f Deleted: December, 2011 )
Deleted: Published in the Citizen
Newspaper on January 5, 2012.
Page 16 of 16
19