HomeMy WebLinkAbout2012-10-10 Handouts @ Worksession 4 * .
Greiner
1 Construction fi
Interior Improvement$ end Expansions
September 27th, 2012
Proposal
To City of Centerville Public Works
Attn Paul Palzer
We propose to furnish labor and materials for salt shed per drawing and specifications.
manual operation overhead door (no glass)
14'2 "wide 13'0" tall Ideal C4ST 24 gauge white ribbed steel non insulated, 2" headroom,
weather seal
14'sidewalls with treated bottom plate with 20) Y2 Wedge bolt anchors in plate
22'w X 241 with 2' overhang on 24' sides only
T111 % "X 8' siding and soffits, nailed with ring shank TLN nails
Fire blocking at 4' to keep salt out of wall cavity
%" plywood on roof and 4' high on interior
15# felt with standard shingles (no ice and water) white D edge on 4 sides
2 "X6" facia all 4 sides
Materials 8,500
Door and installation 2,400
Labor 6,000
Total cost for construction 16,900
Thank you for considering Greiner Construction. Please call if you have any questions.
. � 6
Todd Hayes
626 Marquette Ave So
Suite 840
Minneapolis MN 55402
0 NORTh AR Coma WEST • 625 MutQUErre AVENUE, Sucre 840 • MINNEAPOLIS. MN 55402 • 612.338.1696 coRPORATE • 612.338.1892 Mx www.greinerconstruction.biz
September 27th, 2012
c�
A
Proposal p INDUSTRIES
To City of Centerville Public Works attention Paul Palzer
Supply materials and labor for salt shed per drawing and specifications.
22'w X 24'1 with 2' overhang on 24' sides only
T111 %a "X 8' siding and soffits, nailed with ring shank TLN nails
14`sidewalls with treated bottom plate
Fire blocking at 4' to keep salt out of wall cavity
%" plywood on roof and 4' high on interior
15# felt with standard shingles (no ice and water) white D edge on 4 sides
2 "X6" facia all 4 sides
14'2 "wide 13'0" tall Ideal C4ST 24 gauge white ribbed steel non insulated, 2" headroom, weather seal
manual operation overhead door (no glass)
20) /2" Wedge bolt anchors in plate
Recommend 1 W' angle iron on out side of wall, bolted to cement, to backup wall when loader pushes
against it.
Materials 8,175
Door and installation 2,360
Labor 5,400
Total cost for construction 15,935
Thank you for considering Friberg Industries for your project!
Scott Friberg
Friberg Industries
14255 Furman Street NE
Forest Lake, MN 55025
612 - 369 -2751c
Y
To
3
w
v
nr� ep o Encor I
2rnicrCOi mrnaor N CO u��
Co 17 of vio ! � �p o u) _o A c
V to I N d 6 Z o c').4.- . PJ f
OO I. O M CV N�n N. u e CFAN ? ! CO 69
7 Y*
V
O y O
a a
0
co ,1
2 N 0 N
o
0 i� '
C 7
CD
a m
O c
0 0 0
o co O o 0 u co
N O N co
V
C cc W
Q N
!' a) r
CO o_ a
¢ G
0
1!. 7
Z r LL r �.
c O y O W C O m
O
E o C) 2 rn� LL o V 0) c m LL
w C U c o J 0 O C C O O C C ': O
0 o w U 10 rnSC) 0 E °wS,C) 0
o c m d d o '� ¢= c `w
o : °I G a Q « C c 0 a a tr. °I O a ra x 0 0 O 7 0V W~ O C) oV W~ O
0 C 0 C) 0 0 _. 0 0
U o
0
e 0
,o a 0
T
a a a co co
r ; rte ?
- te rvilTe
Established 1857
Ilf
ock
Feasibility Study
2013 Street and Utility Improvement Project
City of Centerville
October 2012
Project Number: 193801520
Stantec
•
Stantec Consulting Services Inc.
2335 Highway 36 West
St. Paul MN 55113
Tel: (651) 636 -4600
Fax: (651) 636 -1311
Stantec
October 10, 2012
Honorable Mayor and City Council
City of Centerville
1880 Main Street
Centerville, MN 55038 -9794
Re: 2013 Street and Utility Improvements
City of Centerville
Stantec Project No.: 193801520
Dear Mayor and Council:
We are pleased to present the Feasibility Report for the 2013 Street and Utility Improvements
Project. This project was first contemplated by the 2003 Pavement Management Study. The report
updates the findings of that study and examines in greater detail the proposed improvements and
estimated costs.
The report finds that the improvements are necessary, cost effective and feasible. This report is
required under Minnesota Chapter 429 if the project is to be specially assessed in any amount.
Sincerely,
STANTEC
Mark Statz, PE
611)
City Engineer
651 - 604 -4709
4
I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was
prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a
duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State
of Minnesota.
Mark Statz, PE
Date: October 10, 2012 Reg. No.42717
CITY OF CENTERVILLE - 2013 STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
Table of Contents
Letter of Transmittal 1
Table of Contents 2
Introduction 3
Proposed Improvements 5
Area A 5
Street Improvements - Full Reconstruction of the Street Section 5
Area B 6
Street Improvements - Full Bituminous Removal and Replacement 6
Future Improvements 7
Area C 7
Area D 7
Area E 7
Storm Sewer Improvements 8
Proposed Pipe Installations 8
Storm Sewer Crossing Issues 8
Proposed Storm Water Management 8
Sanitary Sewer Improvements 9
Replacing and Repairing Pipe 9
Water Main Improvements 10
Water Main Extensions 10
Water Service Stub installation 10
Water Service Connection to Home 10
Bolt Replacement 11
Pathway and Sidewalk Improvements 12
Lift Station #3 13
Existing Conditions 13
Proposed Improvements 13
Operation and Maintenance Costs 14
Recommended Solution 14
Cost Estimates 15
Assessments 16
Project Schedule 17
Conclusions and Recommendations 17
Appendix 18
City of Centerville Stant& Project No: 193801520
2013 Street and Utility Improvement Project raw Page 2
CITY OF CENTERVILLE - 2013 STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
Introduction
The City of Centerville has chosen to investigate the feasibility of performing some of the
remaining improvements to rehabilitate existing streets and to install new water mains as
suggested in the 2003 Pavement Management Study.
The study, which evaluated the condition of all streets in town, set a recommended
schedule of improvements including, seal coats, overlays, and reconstructions. Also
considered in the study, were streets which were not yet serviced with City water main.
Street improvement projects were proposed to coincide with those utility installations.
The study proposed two seal coat projects, one in 2004 and the other scheduled for
2006. In 2004, the city seal coated most of the streets recommended for said
improvements in that year. Remaining streets were seal coated in 2008.
The study also laid out two street and water main improvement projects, one scheduled
for 2004, and the other for 2009. In 2004 and 2009 the city completed street and utility
improvement projects covering some of the streets designated for improvement by the
study. However, due to budget constraints, the condition of some of the streets and
other factors, several areas remain unimproved.
For the most part the two projects have been administered in similar fashion. The costs
of the street work has been assessed at a rate of around 25 to 30% of the actual costs
with the exception of new amenities like curb and gutter, which were assessed at higher
rates. In some areas, water main improvements were assessed at 100% of the costs.
Where they were not, a connection charge equivalent to the assessment amount was
established in order to recoup the costs of the installation. In the 2009 project, residents
were offered the additional option of having the service line installed directly into their
homes. Throughout this process, the City Council has maintained some form of
ordinance requiring the hook -up to city water once it was placed in front of a home.
However the deadline for connection has been extended on occasion.
Streets not identified for improvements by the 2003 study, including those constructed
since then are not evaluated in this report. They will be entered into the City's new "Thin
Overlay Program" as outlined in the City's Pavement Management Plan Supplement,
prepared by City Staff and dated February 8, 2011.
City of Centerville Project No: 193801520
2013 Street and Utility Improvement Project J Stantec Page e 3
The streets evaluated in the 2003 study which remain unimproved have been separated
into five sections for discussion purposes. These areas are shown in Figure 1 and are
listed. in the table below.
TABLE 1 - INCOMPLETE STREET & WATER MAIN IMPROVEMENTS FROM 2003 STUDY
Needs C/L
Water Length
Street Name From To Main
Area A
Center Street Dupre Road 20th Avenue X 2000
Sumac Court Center Street CDS (S) X 420
Ivy Court Center Street CDS (N) X 420
Area B
Fox Run Peterson Trail CDS 525
Hayfield Road Peterson Trail Mill Road 740
Houle Circle Peterson Trail CDS 660
Peterson Trail CSAH 14 Fox Run 1600
Area C
Sorel Street 200' W. of Goiffon Progress Road X 900
Goiffon Road Heritage Drive Sorel Street X 350
Progress Road Heritage Drive Main Street X 650
Progress Road Main Street Westview Street 400
Centerville Road Main Street Westview Street X 350
Area D
Mound Trail* City Border 1200' NE X 1200
Mound Trail ** 1200' NE CSAH 14 1650
Lavalle Drive* Centerville Lake 120' SW of CSAH 14 X 530
Area E
Cardinal Drive 20th Avenue N W Robin Lane X 525
Robin Lane N W Robin Lane 20th Avenue N X 525
Robin Lane S 20th Avenue N W Robin Lane X 525
Robin Lane W N Robin Lane S Robin Lane X 500
DOES NOT INCLUDE ANY STREET WORK. ONLY UTILITY WORK IS PROPOSED.
* *SERVICE LINES ONLY
City of Centerville Project N 193801520
2013 Street and Utility Improvement Project n �J Page 4
CITY OF CENTERVILLE - 2013 STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
Proposed Improvements
AREA A
This area was eliminated from the 2009 project based on input from the public who
wished to see the overall cost of the project reduced and who felt that the street was still
in relatively good condition. Since then, the street has deteriorated, garnering complaints
about its condition to city hall.
Due to recent complaints and favorable bonding rates, city staff felt that this project
should be considered for improvement in conjunction with the 2013 Street
Improvements. The larger project may help to attract more bidders and a lower winning
bid.
Area A is part of the project studied under this report. Proposed improvements include:
• Full Street Reconstruction
• Installation of water main and services (including going into the homes at the
option of the homeowner).
In the early summer of 2012, Stantec, along with City Staff, did a thorough inspection of
all streets identified for the study and their respective existing conditions. Based on this
inspection weighed against cost and other factors, the streets are proposed for the
following levels of repair.
STREET IMPROVEMENTS - FULL RECONSTRUCTION OF THE STREET SECTION
The streets in this area have demonstrated a lack of proper drainage and subbase
material to withstand the high water table and freeze thaw cycle. Therefore, the
proposed improvements include a full reconstruction of the street section. The new
section will add significant depth of section with sand, fabric, draintile and gravel base
(see Figure 4). Additional catch basins and storm sewer where it is both needed and
reasonably feasible will also be included.
Because these improvements will remove and replace curb and gutter and will extend
water services to the property line, a significant amount of front -yard disturbance will be
involved. Boulevards will be restored with sod and driveways will be replaced in -kind.
The amount of sod and driveway replaced on each lot will depend on service locations
and any changes in street grade which may be part of the final design to better fit the
existing topography.
City of Centerville Project No: 193801520
2013 Street and Utility Improvement Project J Stantec Page e 5
AREA B
This area was eliminated from the 2009 project based on input from the public who
wished to see the overall cost of the project reduced. These streets are being
considered for improvements as part of the last remaining unimproved streets from the
2003 study which already have city water main.
In the 2009 study, these streets were slated for full reconstruction. However due to the
fact that a reconstruction of the road would trigger the need for costly rain gardens or
other infiltration features, a more limited scope of improvement is being considered.
Area B is proposed to be a part of the project studied under this report. Proposed
improvements include:
• Full bituminous removal and replacement
• Spot repairs of curb and gutter
• Limited draintile installation
STREET IMPROVEMENTS - FULL BITUMINOUS REMOVAL AND REPLACEMENT
Streets in this portion of the project will have the existing gravel section left in place
along with the curb and gutter. The new section will consist of draintile, the existing
gravel base and new bituminous (see Figure 4). Spot repairs to the curb and gutter as
well as to the gravel base could be made as necessary. Draintile could be trenched in
along the front edge of each of the curb lines to help maintain the integrity of the
subbase.
For the most part, curb and gutter in these segments is in good condition and will require
only spot repairs. This means that little or no disturbance behind the curb will take
place, keeping costs at a minimum.
Part of the reason for the deterioration of these streets is often a lack of proper surface
drainage. Therefore, the proposed improvements include additional catch basins and
storm sewer where it is both needed and reasonably feasible.
City of Centerville St an t eC Project No: 193801520 6
2013 Street t and Utility Improvement Project Page e 6
CITY OF CENTERVILLE - 2013 STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
Future Improvements
AREA C
Although the 2003 study's Pavement Condition Index (PCI) scoring system had this area
scoring low, improvements were not proposed due to the possibility of this area being
redeveloped as part of the City's Downtown Redevelopment Plan.
The city will need to decide whether or not investing in street improvements and water
main installation in this area should be pursued given the current development market
and the condition of the existing streets. If improvements are made, they should be
designed in accordance with the Downtown Redevelopment Comprehensive
Infrastructure Plan.
AREA D
Area D consists of Mound Trail and Lavalle Drive. Mound Trail is a city street with a
rural cross section. This unique feature allows water main to be installed in the
boulevard without disturbing the street. Much of Mount Trail already has water main.
However, not all of the homes in this area have hooked to the main. The remaining
(western) portion of Mound Trail is still unserved by water main. This main should be
kept in mind when planning future improvements and could be done in conjunction with
another project at some point in the future. This main would also service several
buildings in the County park. The main could be constructed as part of a negotiated deal
with the county.
Lavalle Drive is a private roadway. Homes in this area are not served with city water.
Despite the private road status, the city should look to service this area like any other.
AREA E
This development was built without water main and was included in the proposed 2009
project. However, it was removed for a number of reasons, including the difficulty install
water main without a complete reconstruction of the narrow streets. Additionally, the lot
sizes and home values in the area may make it difficult to keep special assessments
viable. The city is looking for grant money to subsidize these improvements.
Additionally, water main installation methods and routes are being explored to avoid
disturbing the street.
Improvements in this area are probably best pursued when g rant monies are available.
City of Centerville Project No: 193801520
2013 Street and Utility Improvement Project J Stantec Page e 7
CITY OF CENTERVILLE - 2013 STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
Storm Sewer Improvements
The existing storm sewer system has been reviewed by City and Stantec staff. Please
refer to Figures X and X for a graphic depiction of the layout of the existing system and
the proposed improvements.
PROPOSED PIPE INSTALLATIONS
There are a number of places where it has been determined that additional pipe and
storm sewer structures are needed. These improvements will help surface drainage
which will in -turn add to the durability of the street surface. Subsurface drainage
improvements are also proposed with the use of draintile either in front of the curb, if it is
being salvaged, or behind the curb in areas of full street reconstruction.
STORM SEWER CROSSING ISSUES
The City of Centerville has been experiencing some serious problems due to heaving of
fat clays and other moisture laden subgrade soils around existing storm sewer
crossings. This annual heaving and settling from freeze -thaw cycles produces uneven
roadways and often leads to deteriorated pavements. It is recommended that all storm
sewer crossings be excavated and restored with suitable material in order to reduce
movement of the future roadway. Figure X illustrates the cross section of these proposed
improvements.
PROPOSED STORM WATER MANAGEMENT
The proposed project area lies within the Rice Creek Watershed District (RCWD).
Therefore, the District will have permit authority over the project and the storm water
management within the project. In order to meet the infiltration requirements of the
District, it will be necessary to install infiltration basins (rain gardens), swales, or other
Best Management Practices (BMPs) throughout Area A.
In the attached Appendix A, potential BMP sites are identified (Figures X). It is important
to note that these locations were chosen based on existing topography. Locations will
need to be adjusted as more information is collected.
Once engineered locations are proposed, Stantec and City Staff will conduct one -on -one
meetings with any affected residents. Theses meetings will supplement the design
process by allowing residents to provide feedback as to their level of interest in the
program and in eventual maintenance of the BMP. An exact location and design of the
BMP can be concluded based on this feedback.
While some BMPs will be able to be constructed within the existing right -of -way and
adjacent easements, others will require additional easements.
A cross section of proposed infiltration basins is shown in Figure X.
City of Centerville Project No: 193 80 8
Stantec 2013 Street and Utility Improvement Project �%+ Page 8
CITY OF CENTERVILLE - 2013 STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
Sanitary Sewer Improvements
Since the City has chosen to make an investment in its streets, it is important that
everything underneath those streets be checked to ensure the street investment is not
compromised by the future need to repair infrastructure below. The existing conditions
of the sanitary sewer system were evaluated through the examination of the City's
regularly scheduled sewer televising program. The reports produced from these video
inspections were analyzed for deficiencies including mineral deposits, open or offset
joints, sagged, cracked, or fractured pipe. Recommendations for the rehabilitation of the
sanitary sewer system are included below. Repairs are proposed based on the severity
of the problem and the need for that problem to be fixed via open -cut methods. Issues
which could be repaired with in -line technology have not been included since their repair
can be completed at any time, without disturbing the pavement.
REPLACING AND REPAIRING PIPE
A short section of damaged pipe was identified on Peterson Trail, just north of Houle
Circle. This pipe should be repaired by city crews prior to the construction of this project.
City of Centerville Project No: 193801520
2013 Street and Utility Improvement Project , Stantec Page e 9
CITY OF CENTERVILLE - 2013 STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
Water Main improvements
Extending water main to areas without municipal water service has been a stated goal of
the city for many years. With this in mind, common sense dictates that when the street
is disturbed for resurfacing or more extensive improvements, the opportunity to install
water main should not be overlooked.
WATER MAIN EXTENSIONS
Areas to the north of Main Street, in this project area, already have city water service,
the Center Street area does not. The proposed improvements detailed in this report
include the installation of an 8 -inch water main on Center Street, from Dupre Road to
20th Avenue (CSAH 54). A 6 -inch water main would be extended up each cul -de -sac.
WATER SERVICE STUB INSTALLATION
Each home along the new mains will have a service line extended to the right -of -way,
terminated with a curb stop. This will be installed regardless of whether or not the
homeowner chooses to hook to city water with the project.
WATER SERVICE CONNECTION TO HOME
It is recommended that homeowners have the option to hook to the City's water system
in conjunction with the proposed street improvements. Providing this option would be
prudent as this would confine the mess of construction to one year and would ease
enforcement of the hook up policy in 2017.
The City's residents would have two options regarding water services. Option one would
be to have the City's contractor install the water service from the curb stop (property line)
into their home or option two would be to hire their own contractor to do the same thing.
If the resident chose option one, the City would allow the cost of the connection to be
financed along with the assessment and the service would be directionally drilled into the
homeowner's basement. This option would minimize restoration costs, minimize
construction costs by bidding all at once and allow the homeowner to have a "turn -key"
project. If the resident chooses this option, a right -of -entry waiver must be signed
allowing the contractor access to the resident's property. Additionally, a waiver of
assessment appeal would have to be signed in order for the City to avoid further issues
regarding the matter.
If the resident were to choose option two, the City would just require that they meet the
2017 connection deadline.
The homes in this area are serviced by individual wells. As part of the 2009 Street and
Utility Project, those homeowners electing to have the water service installed into their
home as part of project were also given the option to have the contractor seal their well
at the same time. If the homeowner would like to keep the well operational, it may only
be used for irrigation or an outdoor hose -bib connection.
City of Centerville
2013 Street and Utility Improvement Project � Project No: 193801520
.�+' J�QI'�t� Page 10
BOLT REPLACEMENT
In the late nineties, the City began requiring all water main fittings to be installed with
corrosion resistant bolts. These fittings include valves, bends, tees, and hydrants
among others. This policy was invoked due to several bolt failures which appeared to be
caused by corroded bolts. These bolts were likely compromised by cathodic conditions
in the City's predominately clayey soils.
Water main, installed before the corrosion resistant bolts were specified, exists below
streets proposed to be rehabilitated with this project. City staff has or will coordinate the
replacement of these bolts prior to construction of this project.
I I
City of Centerville Project No: 193801520
2013 Street and Utility Improvement Project j Stantec Page 11
CITY OF CENTERVILLE - 2013 STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
Pathway and Sidewalk Improvements
For the area of the project, north of Main Street, sidewalks do not currently exist. There
does not appear to be compelling reasons to install sidewalks in this area. Fox Run and
Houle Circle are dead ends, with little traffic. Hayfield Road has parallel pedestrian
routes on 73rd St. and Main St. Peterson Trail also has alternative, parallel routes on
Mill Rd. and Brian Drive.
Center Street also Tacks an off - street pedestrian route. In this case, the connection of
the new trail along 20th Ave. (CSAH 54) to the sidewalk on Dupre, which continues
through Pheasant Marsh, out to Centerville. Road (CSAH 21) and to the City's main park
makes some sense from a city -wide connectivity perspective. Since Center Street
performs as a collector street, sidewalks would be desirable from a safety perspective.
However, the addition of a sidewalk is costly, unpopular with area residents (based on
feedback from recent open houses and from comments received prior to the 2009
project) and limits the placement of rain gardens.
The city will need to examine this issues and make a decision as to whether or not to
include these improvements as part of the project.
City of Centerville Ic� Project No: 193801520
2013 Street and Utility Improvement Project Stantec Page a 12
CITY OF CENTERVILLE - 2013 STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
Lift Station #3
It has been proposed that Centerville's lift station number three (LS #3) be eliminated
and a new gravity sanitary line be run from the lift station to lift station number four. A
survey loop was run between the two lift stations, confirming this is physically possible.
EXISTING CONDITIONS
Currently, LS #3 is operated and maintained by Centerville's public works staff. The lift
station was installed in 1987 and the pumps were replaced on the station in 1997
indicating a 10 year life span for these pumps. This would lead us to the assumption
that the existing pumps are likely nearing the end of their useful life.
The staff is spending approximately one hour of time per week at the lift station for
maintenance needs.
PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS
Flow entering LS #3 would be re- routed down Center Street to the east. This would
require re- hooking services along the way.
The estimated project cost is presented in Table 3. The proposed route is shown on
Figure X.
TABLE 3- ESTIMATED PROJECT COSTS FOR GRAVITY SEWER IN LIEU OF LS #3
Lift Station Elimination
Item Cost
Demolish /Fill Ex. LS $5,000
Pipe, MHs, etc.
(1600 LF @$40 /LF) $64,000
Jacking (under CSAH 544 $20,000
Connect to LS $10,000
Reconnect Services $7,000
Eros. Cont./ Turf Rest. $4,000
Restoration (road)* $-
Total $110,000
*THIS ASSUMES THERE ARE NO COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH RECONSTRUCTING THE ROADWAY SINCE THIS
WORK IS PART OF THE PROJECT.
City of Centerville Project No:
2013 Street and Utility Improvement Project 19 P 01
$td11�C Page 13
..�
OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE COSTS
Table 4 summarizes the annualized maintenance costs associated with operating LS #3.
TABLE 4 - ESTIMATED ANNUALIZED OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE COSTS FOR LS #3
Item Cost Fre • uenc Annualized Cost
Labor (daily check) _ $50 Weekly $2,600
Labor (intermittent call-
outs) $100 Monthly $1,200
Electricity $15 Monthly $180
Vac -Truck $500 Annual $500
Misc. Repairs (Elec.
Mech., etc.) $1,500 Annually $1,500
Pump Replacement $7,500 10 years $750
Complete Rehab $30,000 30 years $1,000
Total $7,730
RECOMMENDED SOLUTION
From above, the total cost to construct the gravity sewer is $106,000. The net cost
savings in maintenance for Option 2 is $7,730. This gives us a payback period of
roughly 13.7 years.
The payback period itself is short enough to justify the improvements. However, with the
additional reliability of the system, which is difficult to quantify, gained through the
improvements, we would recommend installing the new gravity sewer to eliminate LS #3.
I I
City of Centerville Project No: 193801520
2013 Street and Utility Improvement Project �' $tdnte& Page 14
CITY OF CENTERVILLE - 2013 STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
Cost Estimates
Detailed cost estimates have been prepared for all improvements identified in the
previous sections. These estimates can be seen in Appendix B. The estimated cost per
centerline linear foot of each of the improvement options can be seen below.
TABLE 6- SUMMARY OF ESTIMATED COSTS
Area Scope Total Cost
A Center Street, Ivy Ct., Sumac Ct. $785,000
B Peterson, Houle, Fox Run, Hayfield $325,000
Subtotal Estimated Construction Cost (Basic Improvements) $1,110,000
Construction Contingency (5 %) 55,000
Engineering, Administrative, Fiscal (30 %) $335,000
(Eng. Design, Inspection, Material Testing, Appraisals, Permits,
Easements, Construction Staking, Bond Issue and other costs)
Total Estimated Project Costs $1,500,000
Lift Station No. 3 Abandonment $106,000
*Water Service Connections into 36 Homes/Well abandonment - $90,000
Estimate based on $2500 /home.
* *Off- project Water - Service Connections into 25 Homes - $75,000
Estimate based on $3000 /home
Total Potential Costs $1,771,000
*Assumes all homes in the Center Street Area opt for this service.
* *Estimate of 25 homes based on previous level of response.
City of Centerville Project No: 193801520
2013 Street and Utility Improvement Project J+ StanteC Page 15
CITY OF CENTERVILLE - 2013 STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
Assessments
Special assessment law requires that assessments not exceed the benefit afforded to
adjoining properties by the project improvements. One way of estimating this benefit is
to have a qualified real estate appraiser examine a number of properties throughout the
project area and give an opinion of the special benefit the project would produce.
If bonding for the project, a minimum of 20% of the project costs must be specially
assessed.
It is our understanding that the City will or has hired an appraiser and is proposing
assessments as follows:
Full Reconstruction $3,500 - $4,200 /lot (assumes 90' lot)
Estimated assessments $130,000 - $160,000
Full Bituminous Rem. & Replacement $2,000 - $2,600 /lot (assumes 90' lot)
Estimated Assessments $116,000- $150,000
Per city policy and practice, an assessment rate will be calculated on a per foot basis,
based on the numbers above. Then, the assessments will be figured on a front -foot
basis for each individual lot. For side yards, 20% of the footage will be assessed in
addition to the front yard footage.
The city is proposing to assess street improvements only. Sewer and water work will be
paid through the respective enterprise funds. The city has adopted a fee schedule for
water hook -ups, with separate charges for those who have been assessed and those
who have not.
City of Centerville Project No: 193801520
2013 Street and Utility Improvement Project Ji Stantec
Page 16
CITY OF CENTERVILLE - 2013 STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
Project Schedule
The following is a rough schedule for the project:
Public Open House October 3, 2012
Feasibility Report Presented to Council October 10, 2012
CaII for Public Improvement Hearing October 10, 2012
Improvement Hearing November, 2012
Revisions to Feasibility Report November 2012
Accept Feasibility Report, Order Impr. (Plans /Specs) November 2012
Plans and Specs December — Jan. 2013
Easements, Permits January 2013
Approve Plans and Specs January 2013
Receive Bids February 2013
Assessment Hearing March 2013
Award Contract March 2013
Begin Construction Spring 2013
Complete Construction Fall 2013
Water Service Hook -up Deadline 2017
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
It is the finding of this study that the proposed improvements are necessary, feasible and
cost effective. The following steps are recommended:
• Adopt this report as the guide for development of the proposed improvements.
• Hold a Public Improvement Hearing.
• Order the preparation of plans and specifications.
• Take bids.
• Hold an Assessment Hearing
• Install the public utilities and streets, with construction anticipated to be
completed in 2013.
City of Centerville Project No: 19 3801520
.71 An
2013 Street and Utility Improvement Project �► Page 17
Appendix A: Figures
City of Centerville Project No: 193801520
2013 Street and Utility Improvement Project �7'� + �nteC Page 19
c' -. tervide
Estabh:..haf 1857
AREA air.I
°A 1t..ai I
FUTURE IMPROVEMENT - , , �.�"_
( WATER ONLY) ` �,� �6pG1, SI o mi.
, 0 oo10 py'i197S it tia 114 ®a "" fie fi i��o11 ,
v
� � % . _. s.��� *1I b AREA B
A �����ir A� ��' ioi��Y��a O �,1��8� _ •,.` ®. ..e7e ela 11 ,� �► � Minn 000 w � leef .eer � d�► REPLACEMENT
��� it � ,� 9oia ... vu . e'oaa00 o1C 4. .4s o
a worst: o a N 0d1 a1c 1a 3 ..
/.Q4� _ _ _ _ - ∎ ,L . .@ hoer. us! pro .. coo aaffl nie e„ AREA E
a`� a - i N ��� k li� O Oa IA— ovu�uori
®4� kr I troll a o ?cao'ilr -4 1 ' FUTURE
� � r a. .aaaa OC o uaouu.
\ 111113 I a ° � lima 32: od : ea : :o R IMPROVEMENT
-�� � I e m A - p I S oou,O
O voa �.
®O NI O1 om r. St .,a �. ": (WATER ONLY)
AREA C _ 'nal At :pe 0 CM o ®� ®I
FUTURE IMPROVEMENT -- ^1 kittari#2.111-11t - l aw
t �97 .� O4 oPp
I i " HI .
(STREET AND WATER) I{d0 �e�� r T7 flfl i AREA A � asp � ` , FULL D R E CON STRUCTION
��! X6111 ®1 _� ° o ��s0 v �. /�� I � p se��� d . �� � AN INSTA WATER MAIN
p �m� OIPPF11 m.1. lc ZAq q � � �� 1� � leeaaeov ` \V � �� ���� . i ooaa7ara�Ir il "°a ��' /,'' �� Ca ��Oco�:dv � d� � � ■ o������I /�/i.m�w��p�ioi i�4,°eap4 I Ls. #4 , re lI i11 i`l� �I Q O� v ° ®a 11EO �3� r 9Y! Y oo a�1® 7e � ■S � !— �.. 9 al ino�l o � I �� ■ � I 1 E LIMINATE LIFT STATION #3 S®
ill ® . : . , INSTALL NEW GRAVITY SEWER �.� map /� l+r g0 . , �, , , � ��� ► I �� � TO LIFT STATI #4 �` ,
11V� ����� 114111:411111114:24:
" I �� 4 41
.,--- - IMP / IC, N . ,
. �usuul n�� O��j �,
iii• PROJECT LOCATION /PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS o
.
CITY OF CENTERVILLE, MINNESOTA FIGURE: No.1
Ramie 1
2013 STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS
V: \19381AC WE\193801520 \CAD \DWG \193801520FIGURES.DWG DATE: September 2012 COMM: 1938001520
tervi[te
Established 1857
1 - - , _ , , „.-
ir
a ____. i
40. , , , ,
tatr-taimm! . ,
, : , , , ,
— ..„..„--
4 4 1 ... 4 4 1 :Firrivviiiiii v swan
_
_ ______ _,-, A indit amm all ME- liffiraff ` - ' II
/ 4* �
iu 1 Vi!2 III1Ii � O s��
�®� o � �i °.e ���e oll�eealy y � ,� a
' '■4111111111% 40,
® . �� -4111111111 of M g iiIiillilillb„ _ —
a °m �w1�2 NI I sw m apa
t ��o F '.
\ 0 0da.t vmeMI wo lroo ,
to ME�0M v � .
I 11 1. . d upB�� asl0ss-
11 I �.. a,
x`1111 ..# 1c.oe I X0 1!:'ii OM ..o p � ` � - f I A G
a -1Ella Hlw :o , • - �' il o ro , _ in. �
P .
,; . .,.. �.,. ..� X1 ' "- ,„ �il 4 --,. .,_.::, . ASSESSED rai
7 Ir MINIM 0: arV "VI " iN ' `' -.:- - ' .
.&L,A iramiter,f1j1 kliiiibilif . ' L MI
� p i • s r\ i r 1i w
,' I o �� mea ' *Rise ‘11111 ld
� ►�a. dPr• 2 �� d ae i 4
A
ow. di a ; OofigeopoigimoilOVV IN
■ii ; ■ Pr WI " li AW - w i g • ° d
/l1111b �11PLIS■ a ■ ■9 mo� a - F
° Aping 60o0B0Y YY� � = Ill moo s ee§ a N. ii
iggiii � 1 11oB1P ra . III
131 !11 ■ 4
r Od0 F
Mil
S �g � �� or Carr "Irlippliiir
ill 4 la illiilllitii'
Al
IN Argl tee— . „
Aar .. ER ,
. si. r. iii .
I11/41 4
VAIN
4 Ariel MN ____ ____ EP.
0 600 1200
AREAS TO BE ASSESSED Horizontal Scale In Feet
CITY OF CENTERVILLE, MINNESOTA FIGURE: No.2
SillIdat
2013 STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS
V: \1938\ACTIVE\ 193801520 \CAD \DWG \193801520FIGURES.DWG DATE: September 2012 COMM: 1938001520
i
l i m a N
�_ Ay
��e ®ease v ��
dYf1 � �O �o 6.0 v�
terviCCe ..■signs gtainsee � 00.■■��■
Established 1857 :I PI M s ue �� ® o`� I a M ° '::v ■l��Qi i soo ther ■ie 1 . ® ■ e ■see tee a O I'a V ...... r > . � ' is two , opu�oac� �'���' ,,
f � � � � iS d bawl 2 ■ I 2 a :Mill a lL ec n ®oi
2004 STREET IMPROVEMENTS _ i •!! '�i 0 ri al j B . l ,BB M=11111
2009 STREET IMPROVEMENTS , t IM s ra 9w i
_ 00
tir �._ ark
w ■� MI Gov Ia ®�
ag!!!! �, IlII riaaasaaa °',°a . ■o
2013 STREET IMPROVEMENTS xkllCl ' wr� �1O�� +� � �M I
r 4 x ms 0 31
iii 6 ��� e* A I°. �� �� -
STREETS TO BE PLACED IN THE O S P ��
♦ o
■ ae
OVERLAY PROGRAM 0� '" ' rte �Qlii ® I r� o El ���
STREETS FOR FUTURE RECONSTRUCTION 4), m o , „ := +Y E`l WM• ∎ 0.11 , r� ®
�u + e Y e
�QQ■■aia►v a °, o
PRIVATE STREETS
-- � gr. Viva � �,„,«,
�� * Cmapp� l►�B ; Fr, Off„
, 111111
■■ ■ ■ ■ ■iifi ■ii ■ ■■
COUNTY ROADS as * oL • °i IY■■ v , __ ,,.
05 5 t 6ro■ai . .
0����1111 [ II 6 ®� a e� . d � ®,A
a
IIIJ II
op
411■” II
0 1200 2400 \ � 1 • m'a� ®n f a►
Horizontal Scale In Feet :jj i' . — �� � � � UR . I F iw t�� Imo
■
,
PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT PLAN OVERVIEW
CITY OF CENTERVILLE, MINNESOTA FIGURE No.3P
2013 STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS
Stantec
V:\1938\ACTIVE\193801520 \CAD \DWG \193801S20FIGURES.DWG DATE: September 2012 COMM: 193801520
tervI If e
Established 1857
B618 CONCRETE
CURB AND GUTTER
if 30' Q 30' E
TYPE I ROAD IMPROVEMENT NOTES:
] 6.5' 13.5' 2013
1. REMOVE BITUMINOUS
2. INSTALL WATER MAIN & SERVICES
DESIGN CLGRADE 3. CONSTRUCT ROAD THROUGH BITUMINOUS BASE COURSE.
VARIES 0.025'/FT 4. RESTORE DISTURBED TURF AND DRIVEWAYS BEHIND THE CURB
��,- - - ____ _,
/Ct•� 5. PERFORM 1ST STRUCTURE ADJUSTMENT
��
4" DRAIN TILE (TYP) 2014
12" —'
6. PERFORM 2ND STRUCTURE ADJUSTMENT
7. COMPLETE ALL PUNCH LIST ITEMS
8. SWEEP
1 1/2" -LV3 WEARING COURSE MIXTURE, LVWE35030B (2014) 9. TACK COAT
2" - LV3 NON- WEARING COURSE MIXTURE, LVNW35030B 10. PAVE WEAR
8" CLASS 5 AGGREGATE BASE 11. SAW & SEAL WEAR COURSE
20 " SELECT GRANULAR BORROW
GEOTEXTILE FABRIC, TYPE V
TYPICAL SECTION
TYPE I ROAD IMPROVEMENTS
CENTER STREET, SUMUC COURT, IVY COURT
EXISTING CURB TO
REMAIN WITH SPOT REPAIRS
le 30' 30' R
16' 14' TYPE II ROAD IMPROVEMENT NOTES:
2013
Mk
DESIGN CLGRADE 1. REMOVE BITUMINOUS
2. COMPLETE ANY UTILITY WORK
_ 0.025' /FT 3. INSTALL DRAINTILE
� — "'/ 4. SPOT REPAIR CURB AS MARKED IN THE FIELD
4" DRAIN TILE (TYP) 5. RESTORE ANY DISTURBED TURF AND DRIVEWAYS BEHIND THE CURB
6. TEST ROLL EXISTING AGGREGATE BASE
TRENCHED IN 7. CORRECT SOFT SPOTS AND TOLERANCE GRAVEL BASE
8. PAVE BASE
9. PERFORM STRUCTURE ADJUSTMENTS
— 1 1/2" -LV3 Wearing Course Mixture, LVWE350308 10. TACK COAT
— 2" - LV3 Non - Wearing Course Mixture, LVNW350308 11. PAVE WEAR
EXISTING GRAVEL BASE (THICKNESS VARIES) 12. SAW & SEAL WEAR COURSE
TYPICAL SECTION
TYPE II ROAD IMPROVEMENTS
PETERSON TRAIL, HAYFIELD ROAD, HOULE CIRCLE, FOX RUN
TYPICAL SECTIONS
illr
CITY OF CENTERVILLE, MINNESOTA FIGURE: No.4
2013 STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS
V: \1938\ACTIVE\ 193801520 \CAD \DWG \193801520FIGURES.DWG DATE: September 2012 COMM: 1938001520
Appendix B: Detailed Cost Estimates
City of Centerville `� Project No: 193801520
2013 Street and Utility Improvement Project �J Stantec Page a 20
Area A - Full Depth Street Reconstruction Construction Project
Construction Cost $783,133.84 C/L length Cost Cost
Contingencies 5% $39,156.69 Center St 2000 n 739,157
Engineering 30%
9� 9 $234,940.15 Ivy Ct 420 . '4' ,'tl19; 160,709
Total Cost lalattiblii Sumac Ct 420
157,364
2840 783,134 1,057,231
Cost Per C/L Foot 2840 ,OO
$372.26
Center Street I Ivy Ct I Sumac Ct I
f io. Item Units EE Unit Price Qty EE Total Price Qty EE Total Price Qty EE Total Price
CL Length' 2000 420 420
BASE BID:
STREETS:
1 MOBILIZATION LS $37,292.09 0.8 $29,833.67 0.1 $3,729.21 0.1 $3,729.21
2 TRAFFIC CONTROL LS $5,000.00 0.8 $4,000.00 0.1 $500.00 0.1 $500.00
3 PROTECTION OF CATCH BASIN IN STREET EA $250.00 4 $1,000.00 2 $500.00 2 $500.00
4 PROTECTION OF CATCH BASIN, NON- EA $100.00 2 $200.00 0 $0.00 2 $200.00
STREET
5 COMMON EXCAVATION (P) CY $8.00 5,509 $44,074.07 1,157 $9,255.56 1,157 $9,255.56
6 SUBGRADE EXCAVATION CY $8.00 200. $1,600.00 100 $800.00 100 $800.00
7 SUBGRADE PREPARATION - STREET SY $0.55 6,296 $3,462.96 1,322 $727.22 1,322 $727.22
8 SELECT GRANULAR BORROW (CV) CY $12.00 3,498 $41,975.31 735 $8,814.81 735 $8,814.81
9 TOPSOIL BORROW (LV) CY $15.00 494 $7,407.41 104 $1,555.56 104 $1,555.56
10 GEOTEXTILE FABRIC, TYPE V SY $2.00 6,296 $12,592.59 1,322 $2,644.44 1,322 $2,644.44
11 AGGREGATE BASE, CLASS 5 TN $9.00 2,770 $24,933.33 582 $5,236.00 582 $5,236.00
12 8618 CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER LF $11.00 4,000 $44,000.00 840 $9,240.00 840 $9,240.00
13 MISC. REMOVALS LS $5,000.00 1 $5,000.00 1 $5,000.00 1 $5,000.00
14 REMOVE CURB & GUTTER LF $3.00 4,000 $12,000.00 840 $2,520.00 840 $2,520.00
15 4" PERFORATED POLYETHYLENE PIPE LF $2.75 4,000 $11,000.00 840 $2,310.00 840 $2,310.00
16 TYPE LV 3 NON WEAR COURSE MIX (B) TN $65.00 724 $47,064.81 152 $9,883.61 152 $9,883.61
17 TYPE LV 3 WEAR COURSE MIXTURE (B) TN $70.00 543 $38,013.89 114 $7,982.92 114 $7,982.92
18 TYPE LV 4 WEAR COURSE MIX - DRIVEWAY TN $90.00 140 $12,600.00 60 $5,400.00 60 $5,400.00
19 CONCRETE DRIVEWAY RESTORATOIN SY $40.00 250 $10,000.00 50 $2,000.00 0 $0..00
20 BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR TACK COAT GL $3.50 315 $1,101.85 66 $231.39 66 $231.39
21 SAW AND SEAL PAVEMENT LF $1.75 4,000 $7,000.00 840 $1,470.00 840 $1,470.00
22 SODDING, LAWN TYPE SY $3.00 4,444 $13,333.33 933 $2,800.00 933 $2,800.00
23 EXTEND HYDRANT BARREL LF $350.00 5 $1,750.00 1 $350.00 1 $350.00
24 ADJUST VALVE BOX EA $250.00 1 $250.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00
25 ADJUST FRAME AND RING CASTING EA $350.00 9 $3,150.00 1 $350.00 1 $350.00
Subtotal $377,343.24 $83,300.72
$81,500.72
STORM SEWER:
26 STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENTS EA $6,000.00 3 $18,000.00 1 $6,000.00 1 $6,000.00
27 CONSTRUCT RAIN GARDEN SF $3.50 4,000 $14,000.00 400 $1,400.00 400 $1,400.00
i
28 RAIN GARDEN SEEDING /BLANKET SY $1.25 444 $555.56 44 $55.56 44 $55.56
Subtotal $32,555.56 $7,455.56 $7,455.56
WATER:
34 CONNECT TO EXISTING WATERMAIN EA $1,000.00 2 $2,000.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00
36 8" PVC C900 WATER MAIN LF $35.00 2,045 $71,575.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00
37 6" PVC C900 WATER MAIN LF $30.00 75 $2,250.00 375 $11,250.00 388 $11,640.00
39 8" GATE VALVE AND BOX EA $1,500.00 3 $4,500.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00
40 6" GATE VALVE AND BOX EA $1,200.00 5 $6,000.00 2 $2,400.00 2 $2,400.00
41 5" VALVE HYDRANT EA $2,500.00 5 $12,500.00 1 $2,500.00 1 $2,500.00
42 DUCTILE IRON FITTINGS LB $4.00 2,600 $10,400.00 600 $2,400.00 600 $2,400.00
43 IMPROVED PIPE FOUNDATION LF $2.50 2,120 $5,300.00 375 $937.50 388 $970.00
44 1" CORPORATION STOP W/ SADDLE EA $250.00 21 $5,250.00 8 $2,000.00 7 $1,750.00
45 1" CURB STOP AND BOX EA $250.00 21 $5,250.00 8 $2,000.00 7 $1,750.00
46 1" TYPE "K" COPPER WATER SERVICE LF $20.00 630 $12,600.00 240 $4,800.00 210 $4,200.00
Subtotal $137,625.00 $28,287.50 $27,610.00
$547,523.79 $119,043.77 $116,566.27
Contingency $27,376.19 $5,952.19 $5,828.31
Engineering $164,257.14 $35,713.13 $34,969.88
Total Cost $739,157.12 $160,709.09 $157,364.47
Area B
Construction Cost $327,293.53
Contingencies 5% $16,364.68
Engineering 30% $98,188.06
Total Cost _ iiiiiteafif
Cost Per C/L Foot 3525 0
$125.35
Fox Run Hayfield Road Houle Circle Peterson Trail 1
No. Item Units EE Unit $ Oty EE Total $ Oty EE Total $ Oty EE Total $ Oty EE Total $
BASE BID: CL LENGTH 525 740 660 1600
STREETS:
1 MOBILIZATION LS $15,585.41 0.15 $2,321.23 0.21 $3,271.83 0.19 $2,918.12 0.45 $7,074.23
2 TRAFFIC CONTROL LS $2,500.00 0.15 $372.34 0.21 $524.82 0.19 $468.09 0.45 $1,134.75
3 RECLAIM EXIST. BIT. SURFACING SY $2.00 1,653 $3,305.56 2,330 $4,659.26 2,078 $4,155.56 5,037 $10,074.07
4 REMOVE CURB & GUTTER LF $4.00 158 $630.00 222 $888.00 198 $792.00 480 $1,920.00
5 4" PERFORATED POLYETHYLENE PIPE LF $7.00 210 $1,470.00 296 $2,072.00 264 $1,848.00 640 $4,480.00
6 AGGREGATE BASE COURSE, CLASS 5 TN $11.00 182 $1,999.86 256 $2,818.85 229 $2,514.11 554 $6,094.81
7 ADJUST FRAME AND RING CASTING EA $210.00 3 $630.00 4 $840.00 3 $630.00 12 $2,520.00
8 ADJUST VALVE BOX EA $105.00 1 $105.00 4 $420.00 3 $315.00 6 $630.00
9 SAW AND SEAL PAVEMENT LF $1.75 525 $918.75 740 $1,295.00 660 $1,155.00 1,600 $2,800.00
10 SURMOUNTABLE CONCRETE C & G LF $20.00 158 $3,150.00 222 $4,440.00 198 $3,960.00 480 $9,600.00
11 TYPE LV 3 NON WEARING COURSE MIX (B) TN $65.00 190 $12,354.51 268 $17,413.98 239 $15,531.39 579 $37,651.85
12 TYPE LV 3 WEARING COURSE MIXTURE (B) TN $70.00 143 $9,978.65 201 $14,065.14 179 $12,544.58 434 $30,411.11
13 BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR TACK COAT GAL $3.50 83 $289.24 116 $407.69 104 $363.61 252 $881.48
14 REMOVE & REPLACE BIT. OR CONC. DWY. SY $50.00 44 $2,187.50 62 $3,083.33 55 $2,750.00 133 $6,666.67
15 TOPSOIL BORROW (LV) CY $24.00 76 $1,820.00 107 $2,565.33 95 $2,288.00 231 $5,546.67
16 SODDING, LAWN TYPE SY $7.75 44 $339.06 62 $477.92 55 $426.25 133 $1,033.33
Subtotal $41,871.70 $59,243.15 $52,659.70 $128,518.98
STORM SEWER:
17 STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENTS EA $6,000.00 3 $18,000.00 3 $18,000.00 1 $6,000.00 0.5 $3,000.00
Subtotal $18,000.00 $18,000.00 $6,000.00 $3,000.00
$59,871.70 $77,243.15 $58,659.70 $131,518.98
Contingency $2,993.58 $3,862.16 $2,932.99 $6,575.95
Engineering $17,961.51 $23,172.95 $17,597.91 $39,455.69
Total Cost $80,826.79 $104,278.26 $79,190.60 $177,550.62
110
Appendix C: Misc. Correspondence and Information
City of Centerville Project No: 193801520
2013 Street and Utility Improvement Project Project
1 � $�ntEC Page 21