Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2012-10-24 CC Packet
CITY OF CENTERVILLE COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA Wednesday, October 24, 2012 60terviffe 6:30 p.m. or shortly thereafter II 'Esu,(GsFiec(tt�s, • OPEN FORUM 6:30 p.m.: An opportunity for members of the public to address the City Council on items not on the current agenda. Items requiring Council action may be deferred to staff or Boards and Commissions for research and future Council Agendas if appropriate. You will be limited to two (2) minutes and we ask that you conduct yourself in a professional, courteous manner, and refrain from the use of profanity. Failure to abide by this policy may result in the loss of your privilege to speak. Persons wishing to speak will be required to complete a sign -up sheet and give it to the Mayor or a Staff person by 6:15 p.m. COUNCIL MEETING I. CALL TO ORDER 1. Roll Call II. PUBLIC HEARING(S) III. APPROVAL OF AGENDA IV. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. October 10, 2012 City Council Meeting Minutes (Pages 1 -7) 2. October 10, 2012 City Council Work Session Meeting Minutes (Pages 8 -9) 3. October 10, 2012 City Council Closed Executive Session Minutes 1111 V. CONSENT AGENDA 1. City of Centerville September 27, 2012 through October 10, 2012 Claims (Check #27528- 27563) (Pages 10 -11) 2. Centennial Police Department Claims through October 11, 2012 (Check #9138 -9161) w/Voided Check #9079 (Page 12) 3. Centennial Fire District Claims through October 8, 2012 (Check #5539- 5550) w/Voided Check #5524 (Page 13 -14) VI. AWARDS /PRESENTATIONS /APPEARANCES VII. OLD BUSINESS VIII. NEW BUSINESS 1. Ord. #XX, Second Series — Fee Schedule 2013 (Pages 15 -30) 2. 2013 Street Improvement Project (Pages 31 -74) Resolution Approve Feasibility Report & Scheduling Public Hearing 3. Res. #12 -0XX — Reimbursement Associated with Improvement Bonds (Page 75) IX. ANNOUNCEMENTS/UPDATES • 1. City Administrator Larson X. ADJOURNMENT *REMINDERS ** In- Person Absentee Voting — September 21 — November 5, 2012 City Hall • Centerville Lions Haunted House — October 19, 20 & 26 & 27, 2012, 5:00 p.m. — 11:00 p.m. @ LaMotte Park Warming House, 6970 LaMotte Drive General Election — November 6, 2012, 7:00 a.m. — 8:00 p.m. — St. Gen's Community Center, 6995 Centerville Road Parks & Recreation Committee Meeting — November 7, 2012, 6:30 p.m. @ Hidden Spring Park Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting — November 13, 2012, 6:30 p.m. Council Chambers City Council Meeting — November 14, 2012, 6:30 p.m. Council Chambers (Canvassing Board & Delinquent Utilities & Municipal Services) City Council Meeting — November 28, 2012, 6:30 p.m. Council Chambers *PARK USAGE* LaMotte Park — August 13 — October 31, 2012, Monday — Thursday, 5:30 — 7:30 p.m. 7 Grade Football Practice Outfield of Baseball Field #5 Acorn Creek Park — August 20 — October 31, 2012, Thursdays, 5:00 — 8:00 p.m. Youth 10 Girls Soccer Field #1 LaMotte Park — October 22, 2012 & November 1, 2012, 5:30 — 6:30 p.m. Youth Team B2 Red Squirts, Dry-Land Practice LaMotte Park — October 15- November 30, 2012, 7:00 — 8:00 p.m., Dry-Land Practice • • • CITY OF CENTERVILLE CITY COUNCIL MEETING October 10, 2012 6:30 p.m. Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, the City of Centerville held their regularly scheduled meeting of October 10, 2012, at City Hall, 1880 Main Street. PRESENT: Mayor Tom Wilharber Council Member Ben Fehrenbacher Council Member Steve King Council Member D. Love Council Member Jeff Paar ABSENT: None STAFF: City Administrator Dallas Larson City Engineer Mark Statz Legal Counsel Kurt Glaser Public Works Director Paul Palzer Finance Director Mike Jeziorski S I. CALL TO ORDER Mayor Wilharber called the meeting to order at 6:30 p.m. II. PUBLIC HEARING(S) None. III. APPROVAL OF AGENDA Administrator Larson requested that the following item be added to the Agenda: Item #1; Old Business, Sale of the Liebel Property (7297 Main Street) to Anoka County. Mayor Wilharber requested that the following item be added to the Agenda: Item #7; New Business, Press Publication's bi- weekly News & Views publication. Administrator Larson stated that Council would recess their regular council meeting to a work session and the closed session then re -open the council meeting. Motion by Council Member Paar, seconded by Council Member Love to approve the Agenda with the above noted additions. All in favor. Motion passed unanimously. • 1 City of Centerville Council Meeting Minutes 1111 October 10, 2012 IV. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. September 26, 2012 City Council Meeting Minutes Motion by Council Member Love, seconded by Council Member Fehrenbacher, to approve the September 26, 2012 City Council Meeting Minutes as presented. All in favor. Motion passed unanimously. 2. September 26, 2012 City Council Closed Executive Session Meeting Minutes Motion by Council Member King, seconded by Council Member Paar, to approve the September 26, 2012 City Council Closed Executive Session Meeting Minutes as presented. All in favor. Motion passed unanimously. V. CONSENT AGENDA 1. City of Centerville September 27, 2012 through October 10, 2012 Claims (Check #27501- 27526) & (Check #27527) 2. Centennial Police Department Claims through September 27, 2012 (Check #9118- 9137) 3. Centennial Fire District Claims through September 21, 2012 (Check #5514 -5538) w /Check #5508 -5513 Payroll • 4. Planning & Zoning Commission Recommendation to Approve a Conditional Use Permit to Miller Mobile Marine, LLC, 6995 — 20 Avenue South 5. Res. #12 -XX — Committing Fund Balances for Specific Purposes Council Member King requested that Item 5 be pulled from the Consent Agenda for further discussion. Motion by Council Member Fehrenbacher, seconded by Council Member King, to approve Consent Agenda Items #1 -4 as presented. All in favor. Motion carried unanimously. Council Member King requested clarification of funding re- allocation along with additional funding allocation from the remaining funds ($1,000) in the Parks & Recreation Programs line item of the 2012 Budget and $5,000 from the General Fund Capital Outlay line item of the 2013 Budget that the Parks & Recreation Committee is requesting. estin Council Member King stated that the goal of the g g g e Committee has been to construct one (1) if not two (2) sand volleyball courts at LaMotte Park by 2013; however, the Committee has valiantly earned funding slightly less than the costs of obtaining one (1) court. Page2of7 • 2 City of Centerville • Council Meeting Minutes October 10, 2012 Finance Director Jeziorski stated that accounting regulations require the committing of fund balances for specific purposes through the resolution process allowing annual carry over. Lengthy discussion was had regarding the loaning of funds versus providing financial assistance to obtain the Committee's goal in 2013, cost of construction of one (1) court ($16,000 - $18,000) and a not to exceed limit of the $5,000 from Capital Outlay line item of the 2013 Budget with the understanding that if construction cost are less than the funds allocated in this resolution they will be returned to the General Fund. Motion by Council Member Fehrenbacher, seconded by Council Member Paar to approve Res. #12 -0XX — Committing Fund Balances for Specific Purposes with the understanding that if construction costs are less than the funds allocated in Res. #12 -0XX they will be returned to the General Fund. Council Member King opposed. Motion passed. VI. AWARDS /PRESENTATIONS /APPEARANCES VII. OLD BUSINESS 1. Anoka County Purchase of Liebel Property (7297 Main Street) • Administrator Larson explained that Anoka County has indicated that they will connect the Leibel property to municipal services and provide snow removal for the bike path/trail along Main Street from Mound Trail to the City's property along Main Street then south through LaMotte Park in addition to the items mentioned when they attended the council meeting on September 26, 2012. Lengthy discussed ensued regarding the County's additional incentives and abutting property owners favoring County ownership. Motion made by Council Member Fehrenbacher, seconded by Council Member Love to enter into a Memorandum of Understanding with Anoka County for the purchase of 7297 Main Street subject to all concessions previously offered and including the concessions discussed this evening with City's Legal Counsel review. All in favor. Motion passed unanimously. VIII. NEW BUSINESS 1. Approval of the Surface Water Management Plan (SWMP) Engineer Statz reported that he believed the Rice Creek Watershed District approved the submitted plan. Engineer Statz stated that the plan should be approved by Council and • Page of 3 City of Centerville • Council Meeting Minutes Minutes October 10, 2012 would aid in future grant submissions. Council Member King questioned whether the City would be fined if they did not approve it and Mr. Statz stated that he would research his question. Motion by Council Member Love, seconded by Council Member Fehrenbacher, to approve the Surface Water Management Plan (SWMP) as presented. Council Member King opposed. Motion passed. 2. Ord. #58, Second Series — Amending City Code, Chapter 156, Section 156.006 Definitions & 156.016- 156.052 Zoning Districts Administrator Larson stated that most of the amended language is due to uses that are allowed in multiple zoning districts, modification to a grid form for the same districts, slight modification in language and guidelines for daycare and residential facilities that treat juvenile sex offenders that comply with State requirements along with definitions. Planning and Zoning felt that the modifications would assist both the public and staff in clarification and ease of use. Administrator Larson stated that Council needed to make two (2) motions: one for adoption of Findings and Decision Related to Chapter 156.006 & 156.016- 156.52 and second to approve of Ord. #58, Second Series — Amending City Code, Chapter 156, Section 156.006 Definitions & 156.016- 156.052 Zoning Districts as presented. 110 Council Member Love stated that he has participated in Planning & Zoning's review of the sections and feels that it expands the modifications rather than restricts them. Motion made by Council Member Paar, seconded by Council Member Paar, to Adopt the Findings and Decision Related to Chapter 156.006 & 156.016- 156.052 as presented. All in favor. Motion passed unanimously. Motion made by Council Member Love, seconded by Council Member Paar, to adopt Ord. #58, Second Series — Amending City Code, Chapter 156, Section 156.006 Definitions and 156- 016 - 156 -052 Zoning Districts chart format as presented. All in favor. Motion passed unanimously. 3. Ord. #59, Second Series — Amending City Code, Chapter 72, Regulating Use of Snowmobiles Administrator Larson stated that the proposed ordinance originated with the consortium of cities that have been working together on various projects and found that requirements and enforcement of snowmobiles was unique to each city making if difficult for riders and enforcement. Administrator Larson stated that the Cities of Circle Pines and Lexington would be adopting this ordinance also. Administrator Larson reported that this will replace language currently in the Code; however, the modifications would not Page 4 of 7 • 4 City of Centerville • Council Meeting Minutes October 10, 2012 regulate equipment due to state mandates, and will be more liberal with speed limits being slightly increased and hours of operation being less restrictive. Administrator Larson stated that the City of Lino Lakes appeared to be favorable to the Ordinance as well, but has not commited to adopting it. Lengthy discussion took place regarding language contained in the ordinance referring to an official map defining the boundaries of a "No Snowmobile Zone ", accommodations of the ordinance allowing each City to determine prohibited operating areas, providing a tool if the community desires to manage snowmobiling in this fashion, operating language for operation on both lakes (Centerville & Peltier), the Department of Natural Resources regulations, areas that the City governs, dangerous behavior, driving while intoxicated and private property usage. It was stated that the majority of operators abide by the rules for operation. Motion by Council Member Love, seconded by Council Member Paar, to approve Ord. #59, Second Series — Amending City Code, Chapter 72, Regulating Use of Snowmobiles as presented. Council Member King opposed. Motion carried. 4. Centerville Road/CSAH21 — Design Issues • Administrator Larson suggested that feedback from the City regarding the County's project to reconstruct Centerville Road should be forwarded to them due to the County's designing of the project. Lengthy discussion was had regarding a bike trail /path along the roadway, pedestrian/bike crossing(s), necessity of securing easements, various funding options for a pedestrian/bike trail, Rice Creek Watershed District drainage requirements, stormwater and downtown concerns, and the City of Lino Lakes concerns for their new park and future safe access. Consensus was that Engineer Statz and staff should draft questions, concerns and ideas associated with the project and pathway and ascertain if Anoka County and the City of Lino Lakes were willing to meet and discuss the impending project and possibilities of cost sharing certain amenities. It was reported that the County would be meeting with affected residents in January and that a work session should be scheduled in late December to meet with the County. 5. Appointment to Fill Building Inspector/P.W. Maintenance Technician Position Administrator Larson stated that both he and Building Official Palzer completed interviews and background checks of candidates and are making a recommendation for hire of Mr. Jerold Sweeney to fill the vacant position. Administrator Larson stated that the City received twenty (20) applications and they interviewed seven (7) candidates with Mr. Sweeney being the forerunner bringing knowledge of various equipment usage and • Page 5 of 7 5 City of Centerville Council Meeting Minutes • October 10, 2012 building inspections; however, Mr. Sweeney did lack large truck snowplowing experience and a Commercial Drivers License. Administrator Larson felt that Mr. Sweeney could gain both within a short period of time. Motion by Council Member Fehrenbacher, seconded by Council Member King, to approve the hiring of Mr. Jerry Sweeney to fill the vacant Building Inspector /P.W. Maintenance Technician position commencing October 15, 2012 at the Pay Grade 6 Step 6), subject to successful employment background screening and DOT physical exam. All in favor. Motion passed unanimously. 6. Salt Shed Public Works Director Palzer addressed Council and presented them with two (2) proposals for construction of a salt storage building to be constructed on the existing Public Works property located at 2085 W. Cedar Street. Building Official Palzer stated that Friberg Industries had submitted the lowest bid in the about of $15,935 for a 22' x 24' storage building. Building Official Palzer explained that several communities that are participating in the Salt Brine Grant Project have no need for storage or are storing salt and salt brine mixture off site utilizing other communities' storage facilities. Palzer stated that the original grant contained funding of $10,000 for a smaller storage facilities; however, with purchasing needed equipment and replacing old equipment it was felt that $5,000 could be gained by selling the unnecessary equipment and that the additional city 1111 cost would be $2,000 to $3,000, but the building would better meet the needs of the city. Finance Director Jeziorski stated that the additional fund of $2,000 to $3,000 could be taken from reserves if there is not remaing funding from the 2012 budget. Palzer stated that in the summer months, brine equipment and plows could be stored in the same building. Motion by Council Member Fehrenbacher, seconded by Council Member Paar, to approve the construction of a salt storage building at 2085 W. Cedar Street. All in favor. Motion passed unanimously. 7. Press Publications (News & Views) Mayor Wilharber stated that recently Press Publications Managing Editor, Debra Barnes appeared before Council to discuss this new addition to their offerings and that each Council Member had received a mailing also. Mayor Wilharber reported that the offering would include community activities and city news in the publication for 26 issues with an associated fee of $312 bi- weekly or $8,100 annually. Consensus of the Council was that the fee was too high and that there were alternative ways of informing residents. Page 6 of 7 • 6 City of Centerville IX. ANNOUNCEMENTS/UPDATES Council Meeting Minutes October 10, 2012 Administrator Larson reported that the property cleanup in the downtown area had been completed and the associated costs were approximately $15,000. Administrator Larson stated that the owner would be notified regarding the processes of payment, i.e. the opportunity to pay the bills prior to certification to their property taxes. Legal Counsel Glaser stated that he would be speaking with the resident's attorney to ascertain their option for payment. Administrator Larson stated that Council should offer the property owner a chance to comment at their November 14, 2012 regularly scheduled meeting to consider special assessments (delinquent garbage, utilities and municipal services). Council Member Paar stated that there would be a Fire Steering meeting on Thursday, October 18, 2012. The Mayor stated that Council would be taking a 5 minute recess at 7:55 p.m. and then would begin their Work Session with a Closed Session to follow. It was noted that when the meeting is reopened to the public, no action would have been made during the work session. At 9:40 p.m., following the work session, the council meeting was reconvened. Present were Mayor Tom Wilharber, Council Members Steve King, D Love and Jeff • Paar. Also present were Attorney Kurt Glaser, and Administrator Dallas Larson. Absent was Council Member Ben Fehrenbacher. The Council went into closed session for the purpose of discussing purchase and or sale of real estate. The meeting was reopened to the public at 9:56 p.m. It was noted that the only issue discussed during the closed portion of the meeting were, real estate purchase and sale matters regarding two development proposals. X. ADJOURNMENT The motion made by Council Member Paar, seconded by Council Member King to adjourn at 9:57 p.m. All in favor. Motion passed unanimously. Transcribed by City Staff member Teresa Bender, City Clerk Transcribed by City Administrator Dallas Larson • Page 7 of 7 7 City Council 2012-10-10 p.m. Minutes of Work Session • Present were Mayor Tom Wilharber, Council members D Love, Jeff Paar, Steve King, and Ben Fehrenbacher. Also present were Mark Statz of Bonestroo & Assoc., City Attorney Kurt Glaser, Public Works Director Paul Palzer and Finance Director Mike Jeziorski. The purpose of the work session was to cover a variety of agenda items: 1. Street Program for 2013. Dallas Larson reviewed the comments received at the project open house held on October 3, 2012. The majority of those commenting seemed open to the street reconstruction but are concerned over the construction of watermain and the mandatory connection policy that is now in effect. Property owners are concerned that they may have to pay connection charges and hook on to watermain by 2017. Mark Statz reviewed his draft feasibility report for the 2013 Project. He noted a total project cost of approximately $1.5 million including the watermain construction on Center Street. That number does not include the cost of abandoning the lift station on Center Street nor the costs of connecting homes to the watermain. Those items would add approximately $250,000 to the total. It was noted that the estimated special assessments would be between $246,000 and $310,000, or roughly 20 %. • Council members discussed the deadline for connection date of 2017 and whether it should be pushed back to ease the impact of the project and give property owners more time to prepare. At the same time the consensus was that the city should include in the bid, connecting homes to water for those that would like to hook up. Council member Fehrenbacher questioned again the justification for abandoning the lift station in favor of a new gravity line. He felt the cost is too high, and the potential impact of digging that deep could create unstable soil conditions under the street. Council member Fehrenbacher left the meeting at 8:20 p.m. The Council discussed whether sidewalks would be needed. Consensus was that sidewalks should not be installed at this time. The council discussed the benefits of replacing all of the, curb rather than only the minimum needed to construct the street and utility services. Design of the project would easier and would allow better handling of stormwater if all of the curb could be replaced. The comment sheets filled out following the open house indicated that residents were split on the matter. Consensus seemed to be to follow the original plan of replacing only the minimum necessary. 1111 8 Staff was directed to prepare information for the public hearing that would disclose • all of the estimated costs of connecting homes to watermain. 1 The feasibility report and a decision on scheduling a public hearing will be on the next agenda. 2. Social Host Ordinance. City Attorney Glaser reviewed the benefits of a proposed social host ordinance. He explained that the police department sometimes has difficulty dealing with "party houses" where it is a rental property and the owner doesn't have responsibility to deal with drinking by minors and other drug and alcohol related problems. The ordinance would make the property owner partially responsible for activities on property that they own, even if they are not present when minors are drinking there. The matter was taken under advisement. 3. Fee schedule. Administrator Larson reviewed the draft fee schedule for 2013. Few changes have been made. The most substantive change is in the fees for sewer use, where a unit rate will be applied to water readings to charge for wastewater treatment. The Ordinance establishing fees will be placed on the next agenda for consideration. The meeting was adjourned at approximately 9:40 p.m. Dallas Larson, Administrator III 0 9 CITY OF CENTERVILLE 10/18/12 2.48 PM Page 1 Check Detail - October 24, 2012 Check Date Check # Vender Name Comments Amo 10/18/2012 000355E MINNESOTA DEPT OF REVENUE SALES TAX - PARADE SIGNS $3.82 10/18/2012 000355E MINNESOTA DEPT OF REVENUE SALES TAX - GARBAGE BAGS $13.68 10/18/2012 000355E MINNESOTA DEPT OF REVENUE SALES TAX - PROCESSOR UNIT $98.00 10/18/2012 000355E MINNESOTA DEPT OF REVENUE SALES TAX ON COMM. WATER SALES $449.00 10/18/2012 000355E MINNESOTA DEPT OF REVENUE SALES TAX - TEST STRIPS - CONCESSION TRAILER $1.03 10/18/2012 000355E MINNESOTA DEPT OF REVENUE SALES TAX - SIGNS $15.47 10/18/2012 000355E MINNESOTA DEPT OF REVENUE SALES TAX - SERVER BACK UP DRIVES $21.00 Check Nbr 000355 MINNESOTA DEPT OF REVENUE $602.00 10/24/2012 027528 AMUNDSEN, KEVIN 2ND & 3RD QTR P & R MEETINGS Check Nbr 027528 AMUNDSEN, KEVIN $120.00 10/24/2012 027529 BEDNAR TRUCK SERVICE INC. AUGERS - CITY OF HUGO Check Nbr 027529 BEDNAR TRUCK SERVICE INC. $20.00 10/24/2012 027530 BENDER, TERESA MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT - ELECTION TRAINING & HEAD Check Nbr 027530 BENDER, TERESA $23.42 10/24/2012 027531 BRANCH, PATRICK 5 -2 -12, 6 -6 -12 & 8 -1 -12 P & R MEETINGS Check Nbr 027531 BRANCH, PATRICK $60.00 10/24/2012 027532 CORRPRO ELEVATED TANK 500,000 10 -1 -12 THU 9-30 -2013 Check Nbr 027532 CORRPRO $645.00 10/24/2012 027533 CRYSTEEL TRUCK EQUIPMENT SPOT SPRAYERS, POLY TANK ETC. - COLUMBUS $6,679.15 10/24/2012 027533 CRYSTEEL TRUCK EQUIPMENT SPOT SPRAYER, 200 GALL TANK -ETC - COLUMBUS $7,168.11 10/24/2012 027533 CRYSTEEL TRUCK EQUIPMENT 9" AUGER 4 "PITCH - COLUMBUS $762.50 Check Nbr 027533 CRYSTEEL TRUCK EQUIPMENT $14,609.76 10/24/2012 027534 DEANS TANK, INC. PUMP, PICK UP & DISPOSE OF GROUND OIL STOARGE TANK & Check Nbr 027534 DEANS TANK, INC. $300.00 10/24/2012 027535 DELTA DENTAL DENTAL INS - NOV. 2012 $334.50 10/24/2012 027535 DELTA DENTAL COBRA - K. STEPHAN $29.20 Check Nbr 027535 DELTA DENTAL $363. 10/24/2012 027536 DEPARTMENT OF LABOR & INDUSTRY BUILDING SURCHARGES $78 10/24/2012 027536 DEPARTMENT OF LABOR & INDUSTRY ELECTRICAL SURCHARGES $841 10/24/2012 027536 DEPARTMENT OF LABOR & INDUSTRY MECHANICAL SURCHARGES $53.76 10/24/2012 027536 DEPARTMENT OF LABOR & INDUSTRY PLUMBING SURCHARGES $69.63 Check Nbr 027536 DEPARTMENT OF LABOR & INDUSTRY $995.16 10/24/2012 027537 DEPT. OF EMPLOYMENT & ECONOMIC K. BOMBECK - UNEMPLOYMENT BENEFITS heck Nbr 027537 DEPT. OF EMPLOYMENT & ECONOMIC $17.00 10/24/2012 027538 FLINT, JAMES 4 -3, 6 -5 & 9 -4 -12 P & Z MEETING :heck Nbr 027538 FLINT, JAMES $60.00 10/24/2012 027539 GRAHEK, JOHN 4 -4 & 6 -6 & 7- 11.8 -1 & 9 -5 -12 P & R MEETINGS :heck Nbr 027539 GRAHEK, JOHN $100.00 10/24/2012 027540 HAIDEN, MARK 4- 4.5 -2, 6 -6 & 7- 11,8- 1.9 -5 -12 P & R MEETINGS :heck Nbr 027540 HAIDEN, MARK $120.00 10/24/2012 027541 HEALTH PARTNERS HEALTH INS - NOV. 2012 :heck Nbr 027541 HEALTH PARTNERS $4,757.21 10/24/2012 027542 KOSKI, RUSSELL 4 -3, 5 -1 & 6-5 & 7 -3, 8 -7, 9 -4 -12 P & Z MEETINGS :heck Nbr 027542 KOSKI, RUSSELL $120.00 10/24/2012 027543 LARSON, ERIC 4 -3,6 -5 & 7 -3, 8 -7, 9 -4 P & Z MEETINGS :heck Nbr 027543 LARSON, ERIC $100.00 10/24/2012 027544 LEE, OLAF 9 -4 -12 P & Z MEETING :heck Nbr 027544 LEE, OLAF $20.00 10/24/2012 027545 LITTLE FALLS MACHINE, INC. AUGER 9" 2.5 PITCH - CENTERVILLE $1,623.61 10/24/2012 027545 LITTLE FALLS MACHINE, INC. AUGER 9" 2.5 PITCH - HUGO $8,118.05 :heck Nbr 027545 LITTLE FALLS MACHINE, INC. $9,741.66 10/24/2012 027546 MET. COUNCIL ENV. SERV. (SDS) WASTEWATER SERVICE - NOV. 2012 ;heck Nbr 027546 MET. COUNCIL ENV. SERV. (SDS) $15,769.71 10/24/2012 027547 MINNESOTA STATE AUDITOR M. JEZIORSKI - NOV. 15 REGISTRATION ;heck Nbr 027547 MINNESOTA STATE AUDITOR $125.00 • 10 CITY OF CENTERVILLE 10/18/12 2:48 PM Page 2 Check Detail - September 26, 2012 41) Check Date Check # Vender Name Comments Amount 10/24/2012 027548 MONTAIN, MATTHEW 4 -3, 5 -1, 6 -5, & 7 -3, 8 -7, 9 -4 -12 P & Z MEETINGS Check Nbr 027548 MONTAIN, MATTHEW $120.00 10/24/2012 027549 MOSHER, DARRIN 4 -3, 5 -1, 6 -5 & 8 -7, 9 -4 P & Z MEETINGS Check Nbr 027549 MOSHER, DARRIN $100.00 10/24/2012 027550 NAVRATIL, AARON - MELISSA REFUND OVER PYMT ON FINAL UT BILL 6881 DEER COURT Check Nbr 027550 NAVRATIL, AARON - MELISSA $130.56 10/24/2012 027551 OLSON SEWER SERVICE, INC. 7121 CENTERVILLE RD - SITE CLEANING & LOADING INTO Check Nbr 027551 OLSON SEWER SERVICE, INC. $4,490.00 10/24/2012 027552 PETERSON, BRIAN 4 -4, 5 -2, 6 -6 & 7 -11, 8 -1, 9 -5 -12 P & R MEETINGS Check Nbr 027552 PETERSON, BRIAN $120.00 10/24/2012 027553 PORTA -POT LAURIE LAMOTTE PARK - THRU 10 -15 -12 $112.27 10/24/2012 027553 PORTA -POT TRACY MCBRIDE PARK - THRU 10 -15 -12 $112.27 Check Nbr 027553 PORTA -POT $224.54 10/24/2012 027554 PRESS PUBLICATIONS ACCURACY TEST $31.80 10/24/2012 027554 PRESS PUBLICATIONS BUILDING INSPECTOR AD $149.00 Check Nbr 027554 PRESS PUBLICATIONS $180.80 10/24/2012 027555 SEELEY, SUZANNE 4 -4, 5 -2, 6 -6 & 7 -11, 8 -1, 9 -5 -12 P & R MEETINGS Check Nbr 027555 SEELEY, SUZANNE $120.00 10/24/2012 027556 SPRAYER SPECIALTIES, INC. ANTI - ICERS $7,647.42 10/24/2012 027556 SPRAYER SPECIALTIES, INC. ANTI - ICERS $4,187.71 10/24/2012 027556 SPRAYER SPECIALTIES, INC. ANTI - ICERS $5,054.41 Check Nbr 027556 SPRAYER SPECIALTIES, INC. $16,889.54 10/24/2012 027557 SWEENEY, KRIS MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT FROM 8 -17 -12 THRU 10 -18 -12 Check Nbr 027557 SWEENEY, KRIS $20.88 10/24/2012 027558 TOWMASTER ANTI - ICING - CIRCLE PINES Check Nbr 027558 TOWMASTER $5,656.89 • 10/24/2012 027559 VARTECH INDUSTRIES, INC. SALT BRINE SYSTEM - CIRCLE PINES $9,640.13 10/24/2012 027559 VARTECH INDUSTRIES, INC. SALT BRINE SYSTEM - LINO LAKES $9,640.13 10/24/2012 027559 VARTECH INDUSTRIES, INC. SALT BRINE SYSTEM - HUGO $9,640.12 10/24/2012 027559 VARTECH INDUSTRIES, INC. SALT BRINE SYSTEM - CENTERVILLE $9,640.12 10/24/2012 027559 VARTECH INDUSTRIES, INC. SALT BRINE SYSTEM - COLUMBUS $9,640.13 Check Nbr 027559 VARTECH INDUSTRIES, INC. $48,200.63 10/24/2012 027560 WAEGHE, KEVIN 9 -5 -12 P & R MEETING Check Nbr 027560 WAEGHE, KEVIN $20.00 10/24/2012 027561 WICKHAUSER EXCAVATING INC. 1305 MOUND TRL D12 -001 ESCROW RELEASE Check Nbr 027561 WICKHAUSER EXCAVATING INC. $2.000.00 10/24/2012 027562 WOOD, TOM 4 -3, 5 -1 & 7 -3, 8 -7, 9 -4 -12 P & Z MEETINGS Check Nbr 027562 WOOD, TOM $100.00 10/24/2012 027563 XCEL ENERGY 6970 LAMOTTE DR - SERV THRU 10 -3 -12 $251.76 10/24/2012 027563 XCEL ENERGY 1682 MAIN ST - SERV THRU 10 -3 -12 $72.74 10/24/2012 027563 XCEL ENERGY 1745 MAIN ST - SERV THRU 10 -3 -12 $72.74 10/24/2012 027563 XCEL ENERGY 7098 CENTERVILLE RD - SERV THRU 10 -3 -12 $4.64 10/24/2012 027563 XCEL ENERGY 1601 LAMOTTE DR - SERV THRU 10 -3 -12 $11.72 10/24/2012 027563 XCEL ENERGY STREET LIGHTS - SERV THRU 10 -3 -12 $1,019.13 10/24/2012 027563 XCEL ENERGY 1875 FOX RUN - PUMP - SERV THRU 10 -3 -12 $158.64 10/24/2012 027563 XCEL ENERGY 1600 LAMOTTE DR - WARMING HOUSE - SERV THRU 10 -3 -12 $9.81 10/24/2012 027563 XCEL ENERGY 7300 MILL RD - SERV THRU 10 -3 -12 $124.15 10/24/2012 027563 XCEL ENERGY 1889 CENTER ST -SEWER LIFT - SERV THRU 10 -3 -12 $15.89 10/24/2012 027563 XCEL ENERGY 1600 LAMOTTE DR - BALLFIELD LIGHTS - SERV THRU 10 -3 -12 $9.79 10/24/2012 027563 XCEL ENERGY 7285 MAIN ST - SERV THRU 10 -3 -12 $51.56 10/24/2012 027563 XCEL ENERGY 1880 MAIN ST - SERV THRU 10 -3 -12 $1,901.62 10/24/2012 027563 XCEL ENERGY 1880 MAIN ST - CITY HALL/FIRE STAT- SERV THRU 10 -3 -12 $442.09 Check Nbr 027563 XCEL ENERGY $4,146.28 Total Checks $131,189.74 • 11 CENTENNIAL LAKES POLICE DEPT Check Register - Police GL without invoice numbers Page: 1 Check Issue Dates: 10/1/2012 - 10/11/2012 Oct 11, 2012 02:43PM Report Criteria: Report type: Summary III GL Check Ck No Description Check Period Issue Date Payee Amount 10/12 10/02/2012 9079 AMEM AMEM CONFERENCE REGISTRATION 130.00- V 10/12 10/11/2012 9138 ANOKA COUNTY SEPT INTERNET ACCESS 338.26 10/12 10/11/2012 9139 CENTENNIAL UTILITIES SEPT UTILITIES 566.85 10/12 10/11/2012 9140 CENTURY LINK COMMUNICATIONS 171.23 10/12 10/11/2012 9141 COVERALL OF THE TWIN CITIES OCT CLEANING SERVICE 766.87 10/12 10/11/2012 9142 DELTA DENTAL NOV DENTAL INS 1,092.30 10/12 10/11/2012 9143 DEPUTY REGISTRAR #150 FORFEITURE VEH TRANSFER 96 LES 64.50 10/12 10/11/2012 9144 DON'S CIRCLE SERVICE, INC VEH REPAIRS & MTC 404.43 10/12 10/11/2012 9145 EMERGENCY AUTO TECH ,INC VEH REPAIR 95.69 10/12 10/11/2012 9146 ENVENTIS TELECOM, INC PHONES 87.56 10/12 10/11/2012 9147 FRATTALLONES HARDWARE, INC. EVIDENCE BAGS 19.07 10/12 10/11/2012 9148 HEALTH PARTNERS NOV HEALTH INS 7,748.20 10/12 10/11/2012 9149 HOLIDAY FLEET SEPT FUEL 4,705.71 10/12 10/11/2012 9150 IMAGE PRINTING & GRAPHICS, INC ENVELOPES /FORMS 291.08 10/12 10/11/2012 9151 KEEPRS, INC EQUIP UNIFORMS FEDERAL GRANT 274.25 10/12 10/11/2012 9152 MICHELLE LAKSO CONF LODGING REIMB 159.00 10/12 10/11/2012 9153 MATHEW LANGRECK REIMB FOR WORK BOOTS 125.00 10/12 10/11/2012 9154 MPPOA SEMINAR 250.00 10/12 10/11/2012 9155 NEAL A. NOREN BLDG MTC HOURS 60.00 10/12 10/11/2012 9156 O'REILLY AUTOMOTIVE, INC VEH MTC SUPPLIES 115.94 10/12 10/11/2012 9157 PITNEY BOWES, INC POSTAGE METER INK 58.91 10/12 10/11/2012 9158 QUILL CORPORATION OFFICE SUPPLIES 70.70 10/12 10/11/2012 9159 SHRED -N -GO, INC SHREDDING SERVICE 34.00 • 10/12 10/11/2012 9160 TELECIDE PRODUCTIONS, INC COMPUTER MTC /SUPPORT 375.00 10/12 10/11/2012 9161 UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA CONFERENCE ML 95.00 Grand Totals: 17,839.55 • 1 M = Manual Check, V = Void Check 12 CENTENNIAL FIRE DISTRICT Check Register - FIRE GL Page: 1 Check Issue Dates: 10/1/2012 - 10/8/2012 Oct 08, 2012 12:04PM Report Criteria: • Report type: Summary GL Check Check Vendor Description Check Period Issue Date Number Number Payee Amount 10/12 10/08/2012 5539 11565 ASPEN MILLS, INC UNIFORMS 211.61 10/12 10/08/2012 5540 30485 CENTER MART FUEL 290.55 10/12 10/08/2012 5541 30490 CENTERPOINT ENERGY STATION 2 GAS 28.08 10/12 10/08/2012 5542 31008 COMCAST INTERNET CENTERVILLE STATI 101.50 10/12 10/08/2012 5543 70578 GRAINGER FIRE BOOTS 127.36 10/12 10/08/2012 5544 80400 HEWLETT - PACKARD COMPAN COMPUTER 823.71 10/12 10/08/2012 5545 130440 METRO FIRE, INC BLDG MTC WALL BRACKETS /MI 172.50 10/12 10/08/2012 5546 130850 MN STATE FIRE CHIEFS ASSO ANNUAL CONFERENCE /ROLST 235.00 10/12 10/08/2012 5547 131500 MY ALARM CENTER, LLC STATION 1 MONITORING 102.04 10/12 10/08/2012 5548 180600 CITY OF ROSEVILLE OCT PHONE SERVICE 839.16 10/12 10/08/2012 5549 220200 VERIZON WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS 78.29 10/12 10/08/2012 5550 220250 VIKING TROPHIES, INC PLAQUES 569.57 Grand Totals: 3,579.37 • M = Manual Check, V = Void Check 13 CENTENNIAL FIRE DISTRICT Check Register - FIRE GL 9 Page: • 1 Check Issue Dates: 9/22/2012 - 9/30/2012 Oct 08, 2012 11:58AM Report Criteria: • Report type: Summary • GL Check Check Vendor Description Check Period Issue Date Number Number Payee Amount 09/12 09/28/2012 5524 60700 FRIENDLY CHEVROLET, INC R11 MTC 371.95- V 09/12 09/28/2012 2012009 210300 US BANK DIRECT PAY - AUGUST VISA 2,414.68 Grand Totals: 2,042.73 • • • M = Manual Check, V = Void Check 14 CITY OF CENTERVILLE ORDINANCE # , Second Series ; Deleted: 52 • I An ordinance adopting a fee schedule for 201 {Deleted: 2 THE CITY OF CENTERVILLE ORDAINS: Section 1. The following rates for, permits, licenses and other charges are approved: Reference FEE Chapter 50 Utility fees, Charges, Storm Water Area Charge and Other Costs See Exhibit "A" Chapter 90 Animal License ( §90.02) Kennel License $30.00 Dangerous/Potentially Dangerous Dog Registration $30.00/Year Animal At -Large Release Fee ( §90.06) Violation $50.00 Chapter 91 Buming Permit $50.00 ( §91.25) Administration Fees Associated with Meth. Lab Clean-up $5,000.00 ( §91.45) • Plus Costs Incurred for Clean -up ( §91.53) Chapter 93 Right -of -Way Usage Fees: ( §93.20) Right -of -Way Excavating Permit or Street Breaking Permit $75.00 ( §93.20) (Includes New Driveway(s)) Right -of -Way Excavating Permit/Existing Driveway Replacement$25.00 Obstruction Fee $150.00 Penalty/Fine work in ROW without securing permit $300.00 Restoration Cost Equal to City Cost Deposit for restoration collected with permit per estimate of P.W. Director Note Regarding Chapters 110, 112 - 119 Initial license for Chapters 110, 112 -119 shall be pro -rated per quarter (not less than 1 quarter) and no refunds will be made if the business should cease the licensed activity. Chapter 110 Page 1 of 16 411) 15 Adult Establishment License $4,000.00 (§110.08) Application/Background Check $500.00 Chapter 111 Liquor Licenses: 3.2 Beer Permit — Special Events $35.00 plus $5.00 for each (§111.08) • add'l day Application/Background Check (New Licensee) $500.00 Off -Sale Liquor $100.00 Off -Sale Non - Intoxication Liquor $20.00 On -Sale Liquor: Based on square footage $.60 per sq ft of interior $.30 per sq ft for exterior Minimum $2,500.00 Maximum $4,000.00 Brew Pub $500.00 On -Sale 3.2 Liquor $250.00 Sunday Liquor License $200.00 Wine License $300.00 Chapter 112 Pawn Broker License $2,000.00 ( §112.03) Application/Background Check $500.00 Chapter 113 Transient Sales: Application/Background Check $80.00 ( §113.03) Per Day $10.00 ( §113.03) Per Month $60.00 (§113.03) Chapter 114 • Tattoo, Body Piercing, Permanent Cosmetic Make -Up, Body Branding and Body Painting Establishment License $270.00 ( §114.07) Application/Background Check $80.00 Chapter 115 Sauna(s), Dayspa or Massage Business License $270.00 (§115.17) (Includes Therapist Certificate Fee for Owner(s)) Massage Therapist Certification $85.00 ( §115.32) Application/Background Check $80.00 Massage Therapist Renewal/Annual Certificate $55.00 (§115.32) Chapter 116 Cigarette License -sale of tobacco products $85.00 (§116.04) Application/Background Check $80.00 Tobacco Violation (1 Violation) $250.00 ( §116.99) (2 Violation) $500.00 (3 Violation) $750.00 Page 2 of 16 • 16 Chapter 117 Sale of Fireworks License $100.00 (§117.06) Chapter 118 • Rental License -2 Year Period $110.00 for 1 unit/$25.00 per ( §118.03) unit thereafter within the same structure Rental Reinspection Fee (3 Visit) $40.00 per unit Chapter 119 Commercial Rubbish Collection License Fee $300.00 (§119.01, A 5) Chapter 120 License for water and /or sewer service line installer $100.00 /yr. Chapter 121 Dance: Single Event $20.00 + Police Fees (§121.02) Yearly- Continuous $200.00 + Police Fees Chapter 130 Bingo Permit $20.00 (§130.19) Chapter 150 Building Permits See Exhibit `B" Plumbing Permits See Exhibit "C" Electrical Permit Fees See Exhibit "D" Demolition Permit & Escrow: • Residential (not required for accessory bldgs. <120 sq. ft.) .$200.00 ( §150.01) Escrow $2,000.00 or Letter of Credit Commercial /Industrial Valuation Based w/Minimum Of $300.00 Escrow 20% of Demo. Cost Permit Surcharge Per State of MN Building Move $500.00 Building Move Deposit (for street repairs and site restoration) $3,000.00 Chapter 152 Sign Permit Fee: Wall- mounted sign $75.00 Free - standing sign (In addition to building permit) $75.00 Chapter 153 Park Dedication Fees Land Dedication ( §153.15) At option of City -10% of Fair market Value of all property located in the proposed development or $3,000 /unit (whichever is greater) Page 3 of 16 • 17 Commercial/Industrial $2,175.00 /acre Lot Split/Lot Combination $200.00 plus legal fees + park fees, if split Preliminary Plat Fee — Application $500.00 + deposit of $100.00/Lot or Unit • (City Review will cease if costs exceed fees and deposit is not replenished) Chapter 156 Bridges in easement Encroachment Agreement $100.00 + Recording Fees (§154.132) Annual Insurance Monitoring & Inspection $25.00 Fence Permit $60.00 In Easement — Requires Council Action and Encroach. Agr.$100.00 + Recording Fees PUD Application (§156.251) $500.00 + deposit of $100.00/Lot or Unit (City Review will cease if costs exceed deposit and deposit is not replenished) Variance Application (§156.310) $250.00 + deposit of $500.00 (City Review will cease if costs exceed deposit and deposit is not replenished) Conditional or Interim Use Permit Application (§156.320) $250.00 + deposit of $500.00 (City Review will cease if costs exceed deposit and deposit is not replenished) Rezoning Requests (§156.410) $250.00 + deposit of $500.00 (City Review will cease if costs exceed deposit and deposit is not replenished) Site Plan Review $250.00 + deposit of $500.00 (City Review will cease if costs exceed deposit and deposit is not replenished) Comprehensive Plan Amendment - Applicant will pay all costs associated with amendment - $250.00 + deposit of $500.00 • (City Review will cease if costs exceed deposit and deposit is not replenished) Chapter 155 -same as Chapter 156 procedure fees Chapter 157 Fill Permit & Grading Permits See Exhibit "E" Site Maintenance Deposit/Erosion Control/Landscape /Sod/Driveway Escrow $5,000 ( §157.15, B)(150.045 & (154.410) (May substitute letter of credit) Land Development Minimum $5,000.00 (Addressed in Developer's Agreement) OTHER FEES: Assessment Certificate $45.00 Base Map Updating Fee (New Plat) $40.00/Lot (Developer's Agree.) Page 4 of 16 411 18 (Minimum of $500) Council Chamber Rental Must be non - profit organization — No Charge + Other Charges, • Organizational Structure Dependent Security Deposit (City Policy- 08/05) $150.00 Filing Fees $2.00 Maps and Charts (24" x 36 ") $15.00 Non - Sufficient Funds/Returned Check $30.00 Notary Fees $1.00 /item On -Line Payment Convenience Fee $3.99 /transaction Park Use Field Prep., Trash pickup, lighting, concession facility, will be determined by P.W. Dir. (Min. Deposit $100.00) Photo Copies $.25 per page (one sided) Public Works Labor & Equipment Cost + 30% Research Charge $40.00 half hour minimum $60.00 for each hour thereafter Special Event Permit $50.00 Street Vacation Request $500.00 (review and hearing costs) Section 2. The attached summary ordinance: Exhibit "F" "Summary of Ordinance for • Publication" is hereby adopted. Section 3. These fees shall become effective on publication of the attached summary of ordinance. Adopted by the City Council this day of December, Tom Wilharber, Mayor ATTEST: Teresa Bender, City Clerk Page 5 of 16 • 19 EXHIBIT A UTILITY FFES, CHARGES AND OTHER COSTS Sewer trunk system fee (Residential Equivalent Unit) $2,250.00 ( §51.07) Sewer Availability Charge (SAC)/ $2435.00 ( §51.07) - l Deleted: 365 Water (WAC) /Trunk System Fee (Residential Equivalent Unit) $1,800.00 ( §51.07) Water Access Charge ( Unassessed properties) $6,350.00 Sanitary Sewer Access Charge (Unassessed properties) $7,800.00 Storm Water Area Charge (Developer's Agreement) .05739 per square foot ( §51.11) Residential- drainage area permit with building permit $350/Unit Commercial/Industrial $.07 per square foot of building, parking and other impervious surfaces Water /Sewer Permit Fees ( §51.07) Service /Connection (Includes 2 inspection trips to site $75.00 Tapping Main $50.00 Curb Stop Activation.. $75.00 Inspections (A11) /each $40.00 Service Charges - Meters Testing Cost Water Meter,Charge (§51.05, H) { Deleted: Purchase orDeposit J 3/4 "Meter X400.00 - - - -- { Deleted: $125.00 +20% 1" Meter ,$500.00 i Minor Repairs Cost + 20% { Deleted: $172.00 + 20 %1 1 Special and other sizes Cost plus Handling (These Rates are Subject to Tax) Water Test Fee $6.36 (7/1/06) Water Usage Rates ( §51.02) • Residential Water System Management Fee/Qtrly. Billing Period $21.00 Variable — Rate Per Thousand Gallons /Qtr. (0- 90,000) $2.00 Variable — Rate Per Thousand Gallons /Qtr. (90,001- 150,000) $2.20 Variable — Rate Per Thousand Gallons /Qtr. (150,001 -XXX) $2.50 Commercial Water System Management Fee/Qtrly. Billing Period $21.00 Variable — Rate Per Thousand Gallons /Qtr. (0- 500,000) $2.00 Variable — Rate Per Thousand Gallons /Qtr. (500,001 -XXX) $2.50 Sewer/Wastewater fee (quarterly), { Deleted: per REU - $65.00 Sewer Charges will include two components. The first is a flat fee covering the City's fixed and variable costs for sewer collection (Collection Rate). The second fee is to cover the variable charge for wastewater treatment (Treatment Fee). The Treatment charge will be the Treatment Fee rate multiplied times the water meter use for the billing quarter. To account for summer irrigation water not being treated, the charge for the July and October billings shall not exceed the average use during the first quarter of that year and the fourth quarter of the prior year (winter average). If the home is unoccupied during a significant part of the winter period, the average shall be manually calculated using other reasonable means to detennine the anticipated sewer treatment volume. Page 6 of 16 • 20 Collection Rate Treatment Fee Residential charge $37.00 /SAC Unit $ 1.90/1000 gal. • Commercial /Institutional $55.00 /SAC Unit $1.90/1000 gal Sewer -only customers shall be charged a flat rate per SAC unit or may purchase a city water meter and install it on their well in order to be billed at the lower fixed and variable rates above. Otherwise sewer -only customers shall be billed at the following rates: Collection Rate Treatment Fee Residential rate per SAC $37 /SAC $37 /SAC Commercialilnstitutional $55.00 /SAC Unit $37 /SAC ,Storm Water Management Fee (quarterly) §51.11) _ ;`, -{ Deleted: ¶ Residential (Fixed) 51300 l 1 Comm. /Industrial (Fixed) $0,,00372/sq ft impervious with minimum...S(13.00 Formatted: Normal, Tabs: 0.5", Left Utilities /(Water /Sewer /Garbage Billing) Penalties & Late Fees i Deleted: 2 Residential/Commercial Penalty/Late Payment 6% Qtrly On Delinquent Balance { Deleted: 00344 i Deleted: 12.50 Utilities /(Water /Sewer /Garbage Certification) 5% of Outstanding Balance or $50.00 whichever is greater ( §50.03) Utility billing is billed on a quarterly basis for the previous three months Use of Meter & Hydrant (51.09, J1 Meter Rental W.00 /day -- - { Deleted: 100 ) Deleted: 3 days no charge if exceeds 3 $1,000.00Deposit days $100.00 per day) s $25.00Connection Fee $4.00/1,000 Gallons Page 7 of 16 • 21 EXHIBIT B BUILDING PERMIT FEES TOTAL VALUATION FEE • 1 Driveway $25.00 Accessory Structures Under 120 sq ft. (Zoning Use Permit) $60.00 Easement Encroachment Agreement $100.00 + Recording Fees (Requires Council Action — Not Allowed if exceeds 120 sq. ft.) Basement (Finishing) (Plumb. & Mech. Included if Rough -In Complete) $145.00 Permanent Pooh Deleted: greater than 5,000 gallons or Inground $345.00 side walls greater than 24 inches: Above Ground $145.00 (Both plumbing and mechanical included) Roof/Re -Roof— 1 or 2 family only $145.00 Siding (Lap, Wood, Metal, Vinyl & Composite) 1 or 2 family only $145.00 (Excludes Stucco, Brick & Other Masonry Products) $1.00 TO $1,000,00 55.00 { Deleted: 500 41 ,100.00 TO $2,000.00 5.0 For the first 41,100.00 plus $4.01 for Deleted: 31 each additional $100.00 or fraction �; , - { Deleted: 501 thereof, to and including $2,000.00 {{ Deleted: 31 $2,001.00 to $25,000.00 $91.00 For the first $2,000.00 plus 18.38 { Deleted: .00 for each additional $1,000.00, or Deleted: 500 J fraction thereof, to and including $25,000.00 25,001.00 to $50,000.00 $513.75 For the first $25,000.00 plus $13.26 • for each additional $1,000.00 or fraction thereof, to and including $50,000.00 $50,001.00 to $100,000.00 $845.20 For the first $50,000.00 plus $9.19 for each additional $1,000.00, or fraction thereof, to and including $100,000.00 $100,001.00 to $500,000.00 $1,304.57 For the first $100,000.00 plus $7.35 for each additional $1,000.00, or fraction thereof, and including $500,000.00 $500,001.00 to $1,000,000.00 $4,244.57 For the first $500,000.00 plus $6.24 for each additional $1,000.00, or fraction thereof, to and including $1,000,000.00 $1,000,001.00 and up $7,361.49 For the first $1,000,000.00 Page 8 of 16 • 22 plus $4.79 for each additional $1,000.00, or fraction thereof Other Inspections and Fees: • 1. Inspections outside of normal business hours (minimum charge — two (2) hours) 2. Reinspection fees assessed under provisions $90.00 per hour of Section 305.8 $70.00 per hour 3. Inspections for which no fee is specifically indicated $70.00 per hour Plan Review = 65% of permit Commercial/Industrial $500.00 deposit required when plan submitted for review. • Page 9 of 16 • 23 EXHIBIT C PLUMBING AND HEATING PERMITS 1. Plumbing Permits • A. The charge shall be five dollars ($5.00) for each plumbing fixture, device or connection to the sewer or plumbing system, with a minimum charge of forty dollars and zero cents ($40.00) B. For any alteration, repair or extension to an existing plumbing system, where the work is of such a nature that the permit fee charge cannot be determined from the above schedule, the permit fee shall be forty dollars ($40.00) first five- hundred dollars ($500.00) or fraction thereof, plus fifteen dollars ($15.00) for each additional five- hundred dollars ($500.00) or fraction thereof of the total market value of such alteration, repair or extension. The charge for commercial, industrial or institutionalplumbing shall be: - - - { Deleted: building Two percent (2 %) of the total cost of labor and materials or a minimum of $40.00 whichever - - Deleted: of the heating, ventilation and is greater. air conditioning work to be completed Work commenced without first obtaining a permit shall be charged an investigative fee equal to permit fees. 2. Mechanical Permits The charge for a residential dwelling shall be twenty dollars and zero cents ($20.00) for each of the following units but not to exceed $140.00. A minimum charge of forty dollars and zero cents ($40.00): • Main Gas Line Piping • Gas Furnace • Air conditioner • Boiler • Air Exchanger • Gas Fireplace /Gas Log (Install in regular fireplace) • Gas Boiler • • Gas Dryer • Gas Stove /Range • Wood Fireplace • Duct Work • Miscellaneous Mechanical Fixtures • Gas Pool Heater • Gas Wall Heater /Garage Heater The charge for commercial, industrial or institutional building shall be: Two percent (2 %) of the total cost of labor and materials of the heating, ventilation and air conditioning work to be completed or a minimum of $40.00 whichever is greater. Work commenced without first obtaining a permit shall be charged an investigative fee equal to permit fees, in addition to normal permit fees. Sprinkler /Fire Suppression system permits: Single Family, Flat fee of $400.00 Fire Suppression Permit Minimum $75.00 Page 10 of 16 • 24 Other sprinkler /fire suppression permits. Contract cost of sprinkler /fire suppression system • times 3.25% (Includes plan review by Building Official and Fire Department). All of the above stated fees are Subject to State of MN surcharge fees. 4110 Page 11 of 16 • 25 EXHIBIT D ELECTRICAL FEES • Individual/separate inspection (installation, replacement, alteration or repair) $45.00 Services, generators, feeders to separate structures and other power supply resources: 1. 0 ampere to and including 200 ampere capacity $45.00 2. Each additional 100 amps or fraction thereof an add' 1 $10.00 3. For services and circuits operating at over 250 volts (Scheduled fee doubles) Circuits, feeders, feeder taps, or sets of transformer secondary conductors: 1. 0 ampere to and including 30 ampere capacity $8.00 2. 31 amps to 100 amps $10.00 ea. 3. Each additional 100 amps an add'l $5.00 One - Family dwelling and each dwelling unit of a two - family dwelling $175.00 Up to and including 200 amps service (includes not more than three inspections) Multifamily dwellings $100.00 Each existing circuits or feeders reconnected to replacement panels (new or extended circuits or feeders at the above fees) $3.00 Electrical supply for each manufactured home park lot $45.00 Recreational vehicle site, electrical supply equipment $10.00 ea. Street, parking lot or outdoor area lighting standards $8.00 Transformers for light, heat and power: 1. Up to and including 10 kilo -volt amps $20.00 ea. 2. Over 10 kilo -volt amps $40.00 ea. • Transformers and electronic power supplies for electric signs and outline lighting $8.00 Swimming pool bonding inspection (each separate inspection) $45.00 (Bonding conductors and connections require an inspection before being concealed) Retrofit modifications to existing lighting fixtures $.50 /fixture Transient Projects - Power supply fees as identified above, plus 1 hour $90.00/hour Each attraction or concession inspection $45.00 Special inspection or inspections not covered above the fee is $90.00 per hour plus mileage at the rate established per the IRS. Re- inspection fee when inspection is necessary to determine whether the unsafe conditions have been corrected — a fee will be assessed by the inspector $45.00 Minimum Fee per Trip $45.00 *Electrical work commenced without filing the required permit, in addition to the permit fee, shall pay two times the permit fee, not to exceed $1,000. *For purposes of interpretation, Minnesota Rules, Chapter 3800, Page 12 of 16 • 26 and the most recently adopted edition of the National Electric Code shall be prima facie evidence of the definitions, interpretations, and scope of words and terms used. Requests for Electrical Inspection (REI) with a fee of $250 or less expires 12 months from the filing date. The • contractor must have the work completed within the 12 -month period or submit another REI that includes the inspection fee for the uncompleted work. Inspection fees do not carry over from one REI to another. Subject to State of MN surcharge fees. • Page 13 of 16 • • 27 EXHIBIT E LANDFILL, GRADING AND EXCAVATING PERMIT FEES GRADING FEES • General. Fees shall be assessed in accordance with the provisions of this section or shall be as set forth in the fee schedule adopted by the jurisdiction. Plan Review Fees. When a plan or other data are required to be submitted, a plan review fee shall be paid at the time of submitting plans and specifications for review. Said plan review fee shall be set forth in Table A33 -A. Separate plan review fees shall apply to retaining walls or major drainage structures as required elsewhere in this code. For excavation and fill on the same site, the fee shall be based on the volume of excavation or fill, whichever is greater. Grading Permit Fees. A fee for each grading permit shall be paid to the City as set forth in Table A33 -B. Separate permits and fees shall apply to retaining walls or major drainage structures as required elsewhere in this code. There shall be no separate charge for standard terrace drains and similar facilities. TABLE A33 -A GRADING PLAN REVIEW FEES 50 cubic yards (38.2 m3) or less No Fee 51 to 100 cubic yards (40 m3 to 76.5 m3) $37.01 101 to 1,000 cubic yards (77.2 m3 to 764.6 m3) $58.28 1,001 to 10,000 cubic yards (765.3 m3 to 7645.5 m3) $77.57 10,001 to 100,000 cubic yards (7646.3 to 7645.5 m3) - $77.57 for the first 10,000 cubic yards (7645.5 m3), plus $38.59 for each additional 10,000 cubic yards (7645.5 m3) or fraction thereof. 100,001 to 200,000 cubic yards (7645.6 m3 to 15,291.1 m3) - $424.86 for the first 100,000 cubic yards (7645.5 m3), plus $20.87 for each additional 10,000 cubic yards (7645.5 m3) or fraction thereof. 200,001 cubic yards (15,291.2 m3) or more - $633.55 for the first $200,000 cubic yards (15,291.1 m3), plus $11.42 for each additional 10,000 cubic years (7645.5 m3) or fraction thereof. Other Fees: • Additional plan review required by changes, additions or revisions to approved plans (minimum charge - one -half hour) $79.54 per hour* *Or the total hourly cost to the jurisdiction, whichever is the greatest. This cost shall include supervision, overhead, equipment, hourly wages and fringe benefits of the employees involved. TABLE A33B - GRADING PERMIT FEES* 0 to 100 cubic yards (40 m3 to 76.5 m3) $60.00 101 to 1,000 cubic yards (77.2 m3 to 764.6 m3) - $60.00 for the first 100 cubic yards (76.5 m3), plus $27.56 for each additional 100 cubic yards (76.5 m3) or fraction thereof. 1,001 to 10,000 cubic yards (765.3 m3 to 7,645.5 m3) - $308.04 for the first 1,000 cubic yards (764.6 m3), plus $22.84 for each additional 1,000 cubic yards (764.6 m3) or fraction thereof. 10,001 to 100,000 cubic yards (7,646.3 m3 to 7,645.5 m3) - $513.60 for the first 10,000 cubic yards (7,645.5 m3), plus $103.95 for each additional 10,000 cubic yards (7,645.5 m3) or fraction thereof. 100,001 cubic yards (7,645.6 m3) or more - $1,449.15 for the first 100,000 cubic yards (7,645.5 m3), plus $57.49 for each additional 10,000 cubic yards (7,645.5 m3) Page 14 of 16 • 28 or fraction thereof. Other Inspections and Fees: 1. Inspections outside of normal business hours $90.00 per hour • (minimum charge — two hours) 2. Reinspection fees assessed under provision of Section 108.8 3. Inspections for which no fee is specifically indicated $70.00 per hour per hour (minimum charge — one -half hour) *The fee for a grading permit authorizing additional work to that under a valid permit shall be the difference between the fee paid for the original permit and the fee shown for the entire project. * *Or the total hourly cost to the jurisdiction, whichever is the greatest. This cost shall include supervision, overhead, equipment, hourly wages and fringe benefits of the employees involved. III 1 Page 15 of 16 • 29 EXHIBIT F CITY OF CENTERVILLE Anoka County, Minnesota SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE #, , SECOND SERIES ; Deleted: 52 4110 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that, on fDatel, Ordinance # Series, entitled "AN ._ - { Deleted: December 14, 2011 ORDINANCE ADOPTING A FEE SCHEDULE FOR 201 was adopted by the City Council of the {Deleted: 52 City of Centerville, Minnesota. { Deleted: 2 NOTICE IS FURTHER GIVEN that, because of the lengthy nature of Ordinance # ; Deleted: 52 Second Series the City Council has directed that a title and summary be prepared for publication pursuant to Minn. Stat. 412.191, Subd 4. NOTICE IS FURTHER GIVEN that a complete, printed copy of Ordinance #, Second { Deleted: 52 j Series is available for inspection by any person during regular office hours at the office of the City Clerk, 1880 Main Street, Centerville, MN, or will be mailed to anyone requesting it by telephone (651) 429- 3232. NOTICE IS FURTHER GIVEN that the general purpose of the ordinance is to adopt fees and charges for various purposes. Section 1. This section adopts fees and charges including fees related to garbage/utility account certification, utility rates and charges, animal licensing, buming permits, fees for use of right -of -ways and excavations in streets, fees for business licensing, fees and deposits related building activities, fees for sign permits, development fees including fees in lieu of park dedications, planning and zoning fees, and fees for services including supplying copies and maps, and fees for vacation of streets and easements. Section 2. This section authorizes this summary of the ordinance be published in lieu of the entire text of the ordinance. Section 3. This section provides that the ordinance is effective on publication of this summary. • NOTICE IS FURTHER GIVEN that the City Council has by at least a 4/5 vote, approved this Public Notice. APPROVED this th day of, - fi)eleted: 14th f Deleted: December, 2011 - Deleted: Published in the Citizen Newspaper on January 5, 2012. Page 16 of 16 • 30 • to rvi Established' 1857 Feasibility Study 2013 Street and Utility Improvement Project City of Centerville October 2012 Project Number: 193801520 Stantec 31 Stantec Consulting Services Inc. 2335 Highway 36 West St. Paul MN 55113 Tel: (651 6 36 -4600 Fax: (651) 636 -1311 Stantec October 24, 2012 Honorable Mayor and City Council City of Centerville 1880 Main Street Centerville, MN 55038 -9794 Re: 2013 Street and Utility Improvements City of Centerville Stantec Project No.: 193801520 Dear Mayor and Council: We are pleased to present the Feasibility Report for the 2013 Street and Utility Improvements Project. This project was first contemplated by the 2003 Pavement Management Study. The report updates the findings of that study and examines in greater detail the proposed improvements and estimated costs. The report finds that the improvements are necessary, cost effective and feasible. This report is • required under Minnesota Chapter 429 if the project is to be specially assessed in any amount. Sincerely, STANTEC Mark Statz, PE City Engineer 651 - 604 -4709 I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. /d 9- - . 11 PC , Mark Statz, PE • Date: October 24, 2012 Reg. No.42717 32 CITY OF CENTERVILLE - 2013 STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT Table of Contents Letter of Transmittal 1 Table of Contents 2 Executive Summary 3 Introduction 6 Proposed Improvements 8 Area A 8 Street Improvements - Full Reconstruction of the Street Section 8 Area B 9 Street Improvements - Full Bituminous Removal and Replacement 9 Future Improvements 10 Area C 10 Area D 10 Area E 10 Storm Sewer Improvements 11 Proposed Pipe Installations 11 Storm Sewer Crossing Issues 11 Proposed Storm Water Management 11 Sanitary Sewer Improvements 12 Replacing and Repairing Pipe 12 Water Main Improvements 13 Water Main Extensions 13 • Water Service Stub installation 13 Water Service Connection to Home 13 Bolt Replacement 14 Pathway and Sidewalk Improvements 15 Lift Station #3 16 Existing Conditions 16 Proposed Improvements 16 Operation and Maintenance Costs 17 Other Costs 17 Recommended Solution 17 Cost Estimates /Funding 18 Assessments 19 Project Schedule 21 Conclusions and Recommendations 22 Appendix 23 • City of Centerville S 1 a Project No: 193801520 2013 Street and Utility Improvement Project •�i� Page 2 33 CITY OF CENTERVILLE - 2013 STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT • Executive Summary The following is a summary of the findings of this report. Recommended Improvements The streets studied by this report are divided into two areas. Area A is the Center Street Area, consisting of Center Street, between Dupree Road and 20 Avenue, Sumac Court and Ivy Court. Area B consists of Houle Circle, Hayfield Road, Fox Run and Peterson Trail. Area A The streets in this area are in poor condition and are in need of improvement. If the City wishes to invest in these improvements and if the goal of the City continues to be to serve the entire developed portion of the City with water service, then, the installation of water main in conjunction with these street improvements is the most economical way to do so. Therefore, it is the recommendation of this report to reconstruct Area A and install water main. Other, less intensive forms of street improvements were examined, but do not adequately address some of the underlying moisture issues and necessitate costly installation methods for the water main. Those additional costs would need to be borne by the City, since charging a different water hook -up rate for this area would likely not be well received by the public. 110 Area B The streets in this area are in poor condition and are in need of improvement. If the City wishes to invest in these streets, the recommendations of this report are to construct a full bituminous removal and replacement type improvement. This type of improvement is the most cost effective solution available, given the requirements of the watershed district. • City of Centerville Project No: 193801520 2013 Street S t and Utility Improvement Project Page 3 34 Project Costs The following table is a summary of the project costs based on the recommended improvements: TABLE 1 - PROJECT COSTS Area Scope Total Cost Funding Source Street Improvements A — Center Street Area Full Street Reconstruction $911,000 Bonds /Assessments B — Houle, Fox, Full Bituminous Removal and $497,000 Bonds /Assessments Hayfield, Peterson Replacement Total Street Costs $1,408,000 Water Main A — Center Street Area Install Water Main and Services* $261,000 Water Fund A — Center Street Area Services into Homes (on project)** $45,000 Bonds /Assessments Various Locations Services into Homes (off project) $178,750 Bonds /Assessments Total Water System Costs $484,750 Sanitary Sewer A — Center Street Area Eliminate LS #3 $143,000 Sewer Fund Total Sewer System Costs $143,000 Total Potential Costs $2,035,750 *Based on open cutting of water main in conjunction with full street reconstruction. * *Assumes half of homes in the Center Street Area opt for this service at $2,500 /home. • ** *Estimate of 25 homes @ $7,150 /home based on previous pricing and level of response. • City of Centerville Project No: 193801520 2013 Street and Utility Improvement Project Page 4 35 Assessments • The following tables summarize the estimated assessment rates for the proposed project. Assessment rates for both areas A and B are comparable to those for similar street improvements done in 2009. Area A — Center Street Area TABLE 2 - AREA A ASSESSMENTS Item Recommended Estimated Annual Improvement Assessment* Payment on Taxes** Street Full $4,141 $372.45 Reconstruction *For average sized lot * *Based on 15 year payback period Area B — Houle, Fox, Peterson, Hayfield TABLE 3 - AREA B ASSESSMENTS Item Recommended Estimated Annual Improvement Assessment Payment on Taxes ** Street Full Bituminous $2,004* $247.08 Remove /Replac 11111 *For average sized lot * *Based on 10 year payback period Water main installation is not proposed to be assessed. Water Improvements TABLE 4 - WATER MAIN ASSESSMENTS Item Recommended Proposed Annual Improvement Assessment Payment on Taxes Water Water Main No No Main w /Service to Assessment Assessment Curb Stop If a resident chooses to hook to City water, they would be required to pay the standard hook -up fee for properties that have not been assessed for water main. A summary of these costs can be seen in the appendix. • City of Centerville Project No: 19 2013 Street S t and Utility Improvement Project ✓ Page 5 36 CITY OF CENTERVILLE - 2013 STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT Introduction The City of Centerville has chosen to investigate the feasibility of performing some of the remaining improvements to rehabilitate existing streets and to install new water mains as suggested in the 2003 Pavement Management Study. The study, which evaluated the condition of all streets in town, set a recommended schedule of improvements including, seal coats, overlays, and reconstructions. Also considered in the study, were streets which were not yet serviced with City water main. Street improvement projects were proposed to coincide with those utility installations. The study proposed two seal coat projects, one in 2004 and the other scheduled for 2006. In 2004, the city seal coated most of the streets recommended for said improvements in that year. Remaining streets were seal coated in 2008. The study also laid out two street and water main improvement projects, one scheduled for 2004, and the other for 2009. In 2004 and 2009 the city completed street and utility improvement projects covering some of the streets designated for improvement by the study. However, due to budget constraints, the condition of some of the streets and other factors, several areas remain unimproved. For the most part the two projects have been administered in similar fashion. The costs • of the street work has been assessed at a rate of around 25 to 30% of the actual costs with the exception of new amenities like curb and gutter, which were assessed at higher rates. In some areas, water main improvements were assessed at 100% of the costs. Where they were not, a connection charge equivalent to the assessment amount was established in order to recoup the costs of the installation. In the 2009 project, residents were offered the additional option of having the service line installed directly into their homes. Throughout this process, the City Council has maintained some form of ordinance requiring the hook -up to city water once it was placed in front of a home. However the deadline for connection has been extended on occasion. Streets not identified for improvements by the 2003 study, including those constructed since then are not evaluated in this report. They will be entered into the City's new "Thin Overlay Program" as outlined in the City's Pavement Management Plan Supplement, prepared by City Staff and dated February 8, 2011. City of Centerville Project No: 19 S 2013 Street and Utility Improvement Project �i Page 6 37 The streets evaluated in the 2003 study which remain unimproved have been separated III into five sections for discussion purposes. These areas are shown in Figure 1 and are listed in the table below. TABLE 5 - INCOMPLETE STREET & WATER MAIN IMPROVEMENTS FROM 2003 STUDY Needs C/L Water Length Street Name From To Main (ft.) Area A Center Street Dupre Road 20th Avenue X 2000 Sumac Court Center Street CDS (S) X 420 Ivy Court Center Street CDS (N) X 420 Area B Fox Run Peterson Trail CDS 525 Hayfield Road Peterson Trail Mill Road 740 Houle Circle Peterson Trail CDS 660 Peterson Trail CSAH 14 Fox Run 1600 Area C Sorel Street 200' W. of Goiffon Progress Road X 900 Goiffon Road Heritage Drive Sorel Street X 350 Progress Road Heritage Drive Main Street X 650 Progress Road Main Street Westview Street 400 Centerville Road Main Street Westview Street X 350 III Area D Mound Trail* City Border 1200' NE X 1200 Mound Trail** 1200' NE CSAH 14 1650 Lavalle Drive* Centerville Lake 120' SW of CSAH 14 X 530 Area E Cardinal Drive 20th Avenue N W Robin Lane X 525 Robin Lane N W Robin Lane 20th Avenue N X 525 Robin Lane S 20th Avenue N W Robin Lane X 525 Robin Lane W N Robin Lane S Robin Lane X 500 DOES NOT INCLUDE ANY STREET WORK. ONLY UTILITY WORK IS PROPOSED. "SERVICE LINES ONLY III City of Centerville Project No: 193801520 2013 Street and Utility Improvement Project 0 Stantec Page 7 38 O CITY OF CENTERVILLE - 2013 STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT Proposed Improvements AREA A This area was eliminated from the 2009 project based on input from the public who wished to see the overall cost of the project reduced and who felt that the street was still in relatively good condition. Since then, the street has deteriorated, garnering complaints about its condition to city hall. Due to recent complaints and favorable bonding rates, city staff felt that this project should be considered for improvement in conjunction with the 2013 Street Improvements. The larger project may help to attract more bidders and a lower winning bid. Area A is part of the project studied under this report. Proposed improvements include: • Full Street Reconstruction • Installation of water main and services (including going into the homes at the option of the homeowner). In the early summer of 2012, Stantec, along with City Staff, did a thorough inspection of all streets identified for the study and their respective existing conditions. Based on this • inspection weighed against cost and other factors, the streets are proposed for the following levels of repair. STREET IMPROVEMENTS - FULL RECONSTRUCTION OF THE STREET SECTION The streets in this area have demonstrated a lack of proper drainage and subbase material to withstand the high water table and freeze thaw cycle. Therefore, the proposed improvements include a full reconstruction of the street section. The new section will add significant depth of section with sand, fabric, draintile and gravel base (see Figure 4). Additional catch basins and storm sewer where it is both needed and reasonably feasible will also be included. Because these improvements will remove and replace curb and gutter and will extend water services to the property line, a significant amount of front -yard disturbance will be involved. Boulevards will be restored with sod and driveways will be replaced in -kind. The amount of sod and driveway replaced on each lot will depend on service locations and any changes in street grade which may be part of the final design to better fit the existing topography. 1 • City of Centerville _ Stantec Project No: 19 2013 Street and Utility Improvement Project Page 8 39 AREA B • This area was eliminated from the 2009 project based on input from the public who wished to see the overall cost of the project reduced. These streets are being considered for improvements as part of the last remaining unimproved streets from the 2003 study which already have city water main. In the 2009 study, these streets were slated for full reconstruction. However due to the fact that a reconstruction of the road would trigger the need for costly rain gardens or other infiltration features, a more limited scope of improvement is being considered. Area B is proposed to be a part of the project studied under this report. Proposed improvements include: • Full bituminous removal and replacement • Spot repairs of curb and gutter • Limited draintile installation STREET IMPROVEMENTS - FULL BITUMINOUS REMOVAL AND REPLACEMENT Streets in this portion of the project will have the existing gravel section left in place along with the curb and gutter. The new section will consist of draintile, the existing gravel base and new bituminous (see Figure 4). Spot repairs to the curb and gutter as well as to the gravel base could be made as necessary. Draintile could be trenched in along the front edge of each of the curb lines to help maintain the integrity of the subbase. For the most part, curb and gutter in these segments is in good condition and will require • only spot repairs. This means that little or no disturbance behind the curb will take place, keeping costs at a minimum. Part of the reason for the deterioration of these streets is often a lack of proper surface drainage. Therefore, the proposed improvements include additional catch basins and storm sewer where it is both needed and reasonably feasible. • City of Centerville Project No: 193801520 2013 Street 5 t and Utility Improvement Project Page 9 40 41) CITY OF CENTERVILLE - 2013 STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT Future Improvements AREA C Although the 2003 study's Pavement Condition Index (PCI) scoring system had this area scoring low, improvements were not proposed due to the possibility of this area being redeveloped as part of the City's Downtown Redevelopment Plan. The city will need to decide whether or not investing in street improvements and water main installation in this area should be pursued given the current development market and the condition of the existing streets. If improvements are made, they should be designed in accordance with the Downtown Redevelopment Comprehensive Infrastructure Plan. AREA D Area D consists of Mound Trail and Lavalle Drive. Mound Trail is a city street with a rural cross section. This unique feature allows water main to be installed in the boulevard without disturbing the street. Much of MoundTrail already has water main. However, not all of the homes in this area have hooked to the main. The remaining (western) portion of Mound Trail is still unserved by water main. This main should be kept in mind when planning future improvements and could be done in conjunction with another project at some point in the future. This main would also service several • buildings in the County park. The main could be constructed as part of a negotiated deal with the county. Lavalle Drive is a private roadway. Homes in this area are not served with city water. Despite the private road status, the city should look to service this area like any other. AREA E This development was built without water main and was included in the proposed 2009 project. However, it was removed for a number of reasons, including the difficulty install water main without a complete reconstruction of the narrow streets. Additionally, the lot sizes and home values in the area may make it difficult to keep special assessments viable. The city is looking for grant money to subsidize these improvements. Additionally, water main installation methods and routes are being explored to avoid disturbing the street. Improvements in this area are probably best pursued when grant monies are available. III City of Centerville Project No: 1 J 5 2013 Street and Utility Improvement Project Page 10 41 CITY OF CENTERVILLE - 2013 STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT • Storm Sewer Improvements The existing storm sewer system has been reviewed by City and Stantec staff. Please refer to Figures 5 and 6 for a graphic depiction of the layout of the existing system and the proposed improvements. PROPOSED PIPE INSTALLATIONS There are a number of places where it has been determined that additional pipe and storm sewer structures are needed. These improvements will help surface drainage which will in -turn add to the durability of the street surface. Subsurface drainage improvements are also proposed with the use of draintile either in front of the curb, if it is being salvaged, or behind the curb in areas of full street reconstruction. STORM SEWER CROSSING ISSUES The City of Centerville has been experiencing some serious problems due to heaving of fat clays and other moisture laden subgrade soils around existing storm sewer crossings. This annual heaving and settling from freeze -thaw cycles produces uneven roadways and often leads to deteriorated pavements. It is recommended that all storm sewer crossings be excavated and restored with suitable material in order to reduce movement of the future roadway. Figure 7 illustrates the cross section of these proposed improvements. PROPOSED STORM WATER MANAGEMENT • The proposed project area lies within the Rice Creek Watershed District (RCWD). Therefore, the District will have permit authority over the project and the storm water management within the project. In order to meet the infiltration requirements of the District, it will be necessary to install infiltration basins (rain gardens), swales, or other Best Management Practices (BMPs) throughout Area A. In the attached Appendix A, potential BMP sites are identified (Figure 8). It is important to note that these locations were chosen based on existing topography. Locations will need to be adjusted as more information is collected. Once engineered locations are proposed, Stantec and City Staff will conduct one -on -one meetings with any affected residents. These meetings will supplement the design process by allowing residents to provide feedback as to their level of interest in the program and in eventual maintenance of the BMP. An exact location and design of the BMP can be concluded based on this feedback. While some BMPs will be able to be constructed within the existing right -of -way and adjacent easements, others will require additional easements. A cross section of proposed infiltration basins is shown in Figure 9. 1111 City of Centerville _ Project No: 193801520 2013 Street and Utility Improvement Project � Page 11 42 • CITY OF CENTERVILLE - 2013 STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT San Sewer Improvements Since the City has chosen to make an investment in its streets, it is important that everything underneath those streets be checked to ensure the street investment is not compromised by the future need to repair infrastructure below. The existing conditions of the sanitary sewer system were evaluated through the examination of the City's regularly scheduled sewer televising program. The reports produced from these video inspections were analyzed for deficiencies including mineral deposits, open or offset joints, sagged, cracked, or fractured pipe. Recommendations for the rehabilitation of the sanitary sewer system are included below. Repairs are proposed based on the severity of the problem and the need for that problem to be fixed via open -cut methods. Issues which could be repaired with in -line technology have not been included since their repair can be completed at any time, without disturbing the pavement. REPLACING AND REPAIRING PIPE A short section of damaged pipe was identified on Peterson Trail, just north of Houle Circle. This pipe should be repaired by city crews prior to the construction of this project. • 1111 City of Centerville Project No: 193801520 2013 Street and Utility Improvement Project + n Page 12 43 CITY OF CENTERVILLE - 2013 STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT • Water Main Improvements Extending water main to areas without municipal water service has been a stated goal of the city for many years. With this in mind, common sense dictates that when the street is disturbed for resurfacing or more extensive improvements, the opportunity to install water main should not be overlooked. WATER MAIN EXTENSIONS Areas to the north of Main Street, in this project area, already have city water service, the Center Street area does not. The proposed improvements detailed in this report include the installation of an 8 -inch water main on Center Street, from Dupre Road to 20th Avenue (CSAH 54). A 6 -inch water main would be extended up each cul -de -sac. WATER SERVICE STUB INSTALLATION Each home along the new mains will have a service line extended to the right -of -way, terminated with a curb stop. This will be installed regardless of whether or not the homeowner chooses to hook to city water with the project. WATER SERVICE CONNECTION TO HOME It is recommended that homeowners have the option to hook to the City's water system in conjunction with the proposed street improvements. Providing this option would be prudent as this would confine the mess of construction to one year and would ease enforcement of the hook up policy in 2017. The City's residents would have two options regarding water services. Option one would be to have the City's contractor install the water service from the curb stop (property line) into their home or option two would be to hire their own contractor to do the same thing. If the resident chose option one, the City would allow the cost of the connection to be financed along with the assessment and the service would be directionally drilled into the homeowner's basement. This option would minimize restoration costs, minimize construction costs by bidding all at once and allow the homeowner to have a "turn -key" project. If the resident chooses this option, a right -of -entry waiver must be signed allowing the contractor access to the resident's property. Additionally, a waiver of assessment appeal would have to be signed in order for the City to avoid further issues regarding the matter. If the resident were to choose option two, the City would just require that they meet the 2017 connection deadline. The homes in this area are serviced by individual wells. As part of the 2009 Street and Utility Project, those homeowners electing to have the water service installed into their home as part of project were also given the option to have the contractor seal their well at the same time. If the homeowner would like to keep the well operational, it may only be used for irrigation or an outdoor hose -bib connection. • City of Centerville Project No: 193801520 2013 Street and Utility Improvement Project y Page 13 44 • BOLT REPLACEMENT In the Tate nineties, the City began requiring all water main fittings to be installed with corrosion resistant bolts. These fittings include valves, bends, tees, and hydrants among others. This policy was invoked due to several bolt failures which appeared to be caused by corroded bolts. These bolts were likely compromised by cathodic conditions in the City's predominately clayey soils. Water main, installed before the corrosion resistant bolts were specified, exists below streets proposed to be rehabilitated with this project. City staff has or will coordinate the replacement of these bolts prior to construction of this project. • • City of Centerville Project N 193801520 5f 2013 Street and Utility Improvement Project Page 14 45 CITY OF CENTERVILLE - 2013 STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT • Pathway and Sidewalk Improvements For the area of the project, north of Main Street, sidewalks do not currently exist. There does not appear to be compelling reasons to install sidewalks in this area. Fox Run and Houle Circle are dead ends, with little traffic. Hayfield Road has parallel pedestrian routes on 73rd St. and Main St. Peterson Trail also has alternative, parallel routes on Mill Rd. and Brian Drive. Center Street also lacks an off - street pedestrian route. In this case, the connection of the new trail along 20th Ave. (CSAH 54) to the sidewalk on Dupre, which continues through Pheasant Marsh, out to Centerville Road (CSAH 21) and to the City's main park makes some sense from a city -wide connectivity perspective. Since Center Street performs as a collector street, sidewalks would be desirable from a safety perspective. However, the addition of a sidewalk is costly, unpopular with area residents (based on feedback from recent open houses and from comments received prior to the 2009 project) and limits the placement of rain gardens. The city will need to examine this issues and make a decision as to whether or not to include these improvements as part of the project. City of Centerville _ Project No: 193801520 2013 Street and Utility Improvement Project � Page 15 46 • CITY OF CENTERVILLE - 2013 STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT Lift Station #3 • It has been proposed that Centerville's lift station number three (LS #3) be eliminated and a new gravity sanitary line be run from the lift station to lift station number four. A survey loop was run between the two lift stations, confirming this is physically possible. EXISTING CONDITIONS Currently, LS #3 is operated and maintained by Centerville's public works staff. The lift station was installed in 1987 and the pumps were replaced on the station in 1997 indicating a 10 year life span for these pumps. This would lead us to the assumption that the existing pumps are likely nearing the end of their useful life. The staff is spending approximately one hour of time per week at the lift station for maintenance needs. PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS Flow entering LS #3 would be re- routed down Center Street to the east. This would require re- hooking services along the way. The estimated project cost is presented in Table 3. The proposed route is shown on Figure 10. • TABLE 6- ESTIMATED PROJECT COSTS FOR GRAVITY SEWER IN LIEU OF LS #3 Lift Station Elimination Item Cost Demolish /Fill Ex. LS $5,000 Pipe, MHs, etc. (1600 LF @$40 /LF) $64,000 Jacking (under CSAH 54) $20,000 Connect to LS $10,000 Reconnect Services $7,000 Eros. Cont./ Turf Rest. $4,000 Restoration (road)* $- Construction Total $110,000 Engineering /Contingency $33,000 Total Project Cost $143,000 THIS ASSUMES THERE ARE NO COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH RECONSTRUCTING THE ROADWAY SINCE THIS WORK IS PART OF THE PROJECT. City of Centerville Project No: 193801520 2013 Street and Utility Improvement Project J + Stanfiec Page 16 47 OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE COSTS • Table 7 summarizes the annualized maintenance costs associated with operating LS #3. TABLE 7 - ESTIMATED ANNUALIZED OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE COSTS FOR LS #3 Item Cost Fre • uenc Annualized Cost Labor (daily check) $50 Weekly $2,600 Labor (intermittent call - outs) $100 Monthly $1,200 Electricity $15 Monthly $180 Vac -Truck $500 Annual $500 Misc. Repairs (Elec. Mech., etc.) $1,500 Annually $1,500 Pump Replacement $7,500 10 years $750 Complete Rehab $30,000 30 years $1,000 Total $7,730 OTHER COSTS In the analysis of this situation, there are a number of related costs which are extremely difficult to accurately account for. Factors tipping the scale towards completing the project include: • The value of a more reliable gravity system and costs related to sewer back -up claims if there was to be such an event • • Aesthetic value of having the lift station removed from the neighborhood (this may include both visual and smell factors) • Costs associated with reconstruction of the new street if the sewer work is not done, the street work is, and then the sewer system fails (necessitating reconstruction) prior to the useful life of the street ending. Factors tipping the scale towards NOT completing the project include: • Costs related to the lift station not having served its full life expectancy • Costs associated with potential premature street deterioration due to disturbance of the underlying soils to install the sewer RECOMMENDED SOLUTION From above, the total cost to construct the gravity sewer is $143,000. The net cost savings in maintenance for Option 2 is $7,730. This gives us a payback period of roughly 18.5 years. The payback period, itself, is short enough to justify the improvements. However, with the additional reliability of the system, gained through the improvements, we would recommend installing the new gravity sewer to eliminate LS #3. • City of Centerville Project nille P No: 1 7 2013 Street 5 f t and Utility Improvement Project C7 Page a 17 48 CITY OF CENTERVILLE - 2013 STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT Cost Estimates /Funding Detailed cost estimates have been prepared for all improvements identified in the previous sections. These estimates can be seen in the Appendix. TABLE 8- SUMMARY OF ESTIMATED COSTS Area Scope Total Cost Funding Source Street Improvements A — Center Street Area Full Street Reconstruction $911,000 Bonds /Assessments B — Houle, Fox, Full Bituminous Removal and $497,000 Bonds /Assessments Hayfield, Peterson Replacement Total Street Costs $1,408,000 Water Main A — Center Street Area Install Water Main and Services $261,000 Water Fund Services into Homes (on project)* $45,000 Bonds /Assessments Services into Homes (off project) ** $178,750 Bonds /Assessments Total Water System Costs $484,750 Sanitary Sewer A — Center Street Area Eliminate LS #3 $143,000 Sewer Fund Total Sewer System Costs $143,000 Total Potential Costs $2,035,750 *Assumes half of homes in the Center Street Area opt for this service at $2,500 /home. * *Estimate of 25 homes @ $7,150 /home based on previous level of response. • City of Centerville _ Project No: 193801520 2013 Street and Utility Improvement Project � Page 18 49 CITY OF CENTERVILLE - 2013 STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT • Assessments Special assessment law requires that assessments not exceed the benefit afforded to adjoining properties by the project improvements. One way of estimating this benefit is to have a qualified real estate appraiser examine a number of properties throughout the project area and give an opinion of the special benefit the project would produce. If bonding for the project, a minimum of 20% of the project costs must be specially assessed. It is our understanding that the City will or has hired an appraiser and is proposing assessments as follows: Full Reconstruction $3,500 - $4,200 /lot (assumes 90' lot) Estimated assessments $130,000 - $160,000 Full Bituminous Rem. & Replacement $2,000 - $2,600 /lot (assumes 90' lot) Estimated Assessments $116,000- $150,000 Per city policy and practice, an assessment rate will be calculated on a per foot basis, based on the numbers above. Then, the assessments will be figured on a front -foot basis for each individual lot. For side yards, 20% of the footage will be assessed in addition to the front yard footage. The city is proposing to assess street improvements only. Sewer and water work will be paid through the respective enterprise funds. The city has adopted a fee schedule for water hook -ups, with separate charges for those who have been assessed and those who have not. A summary of the proposed assessments is presented below: • Assessment rates for both areas A and B are comparable to those for similar street improvements done in 2009. Area A — Center Street Area TABLE 9 - AREA A ASSESSMENTS Item Recommended Estimated Annual Improvement Assessment* Payment on Taxes ** Street Full $4,141 $372.45 Reconstruction *For average sized lot * *Based on 15 year payback period Area B — Houle, Fox, Peterson, Hayfield TABLE 10 - AREA B ASSESSMENTS Item Recommended Estimated Annual Improvement Assessment Payment on Taxes ** Street Full Bituminous $2,004* $247.08 Remove /Replac *For average sized lot • City of Centerville Project No: 19 3801520 Sl1 2013 Street and Utility Improvement Project Page 19 50 • * *Based on 10 year payback period Water main installation is not proposed to be assessed. Water Improvements TABLE 11 - WATER ASSESSMENTS Item Recommended Proposed Annual Improvement Assessment Payment on Taxes Water Water Main No No Main w /Service to Assessment Assessment Curb Stop If a resident chooses to hook to City water, they would be required to pay the standard hook -up fee for properties that have not been assessed for water main. A summary of these costs can be seen in the appendix. • • City of Centerville Project No: 193801520 5 2013 Street and Utility Improvement Project J Page 20 51 CITY OF CENTERVILLE - 2013 STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT • Project Schedule The following is a rough schedule for the project: Public Open House October 3, 2012 Feasibility Report Presented to Council October 24, 2012 Call for Public Improvement Hearing October 24, 2012 Improvement Hearing November 2012 Revisions to Feasibility Report November 2012 Accept Feasibility Report, Order Impr. (Plans /Specs) November 2012 Plans and Specs December — Jan. 2013 Easements, Permits January 2013 Approve Plans and Specs January 2013 Receive Bids February 2013 Assessment Hearing March 2013 Award Contract March 2013 Begin Construction Spring 2013 Complete Construction Fall 2013 Water Service Hook -up Deadline 2017 • • City of Centerville Project No: 193801520 2013 Street and Utility Improvement Project y Page 21 52 CITY OF CENTERVILLE - 2013 STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT . 0 Conclusions and Recommendations It is the finding of this study that at the proposed improvements 9 Y are necess P P necessary, feasible and cost effective. The following steps r g p are recommended: • Adopt this report as the guide for development of the proposed improvements. • Hold a Public Improvement Hearing. • Order the preparation of plans and specifications. • Take bids. • Hold an Assessment Hearing • Install the public utilities and streets, with construction anticipated to be completed in 2013. III III City of Centerville Project No: 193801520 2013 Street and Utility Improvement Project 0 Page 22 53 Appendix City of Centerville Project No: 193801520 2013 Street and Utility Improvement Project e7_ � Page 23 54 • Appendix A: Figures • • City of Centerville Project No: 193801520 2013 Street and Utility Improvement Project �7�+ Page 24 55 • t _ N M= Lq � 2Aui� r ur AREA E q�'� FUTURE IMPROVEMENT •�� � �IV —�- (WATER ONLY) *kV � �� ��„ ^° _ /' * s r e tip 0p.. r' '�49 ve -- _ dadi Qr F Ini =MNMi e e� ,\ .+ 1,127 eeea "- 1VECL0ave n 000a . • AREA B F �Iitbr e ,�� g o r w tipr to iaiii�o ep0 pv aav ca FULL BTTUMINOUS ■ fee _s A I�� °P .�.� ,.� - pa ° °' od ( oO _ ove rco mo eeee eeeee111� m � • REMOVAL AND e1 ;�,1� " '', � ta t I 'I ®�� dr e. Eratt":"v eo °° 2 0 1 1 u � l eeee so .. de v ° � REPLACEMENT °QOOO a ..l LI ee0 1 n o u m a /00..`' ` ∎ • .Q� _ l� �ed. NV �o . ° � Mauna AREA E , e r o a" a dose Meg }� o I' FUTURE v i1 r . .000G °v. 1 . - \ a anfgs °. •e99oeov a r , IMPROVEMENT =HMI:. m °v ac o o' ~ ° 111 � -.+ (WATER ONLY) �1° g 0 °1.. ; • AREA C 'Tv- :::a ril ""8" C "Pww i _• - _ / i FUTURE IMPROVEMENT - . tT: (STREET AND WATER) it ' EIT r, r�a : 'o 11�.1 . _ I: �i V7 �� � AREA A • r � vv �r■!�NIIti1 4 - f . -4411 isfp FULL RECONSTRUCTION • 7� kk �.�`'; d ��e��•� e���1f � AND INSTALL WATER MAIN 0 ..c if _ �. � . Y ::301. n�► ∎. Mika ` ieeaege�� __. viLit: vv oeaocorr� )iiill aoA U, .00000all����o�voavvl.O �' 1 - � ��00, vo v0.v0�0� . r Y O a7O Of �'„VaFr P gi■°_ 11v¢vo1 i si1i! al o��o p lleo ��11l�01 . � ow R� I:14 _ 0..6. , -a ga. III ELIMINATE L9 IFT STATION #3 l SA IN STALL NEW GRA III /111 i .� r "°. `r� T O LIFT STATION #4 ,. �� ,� A "=.10••• � � y S"4�� v` o_ , _10 a Iii' . ..„1..../E PROJECT LOCATION /PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS CITY OF CENTERVILLE, MINNESOTA FIGURE: No.1 Santee 2013 STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS VA 19381ACTIVE\ 193801520 \EAD\DWG\19 3 8 015 20FlGlMB.DNG DATE: SmAmmbe 2012 COMM: 1939001520 • 56 0,,lk �it'r i terv ) • Estad£ished 1857 a n /i► 1 5P l ,uo©ewe pillW MW. E ®�JOVP °11111111 Ili a o IT veoo.�,l irioli®� t®6pi : 11161 E� a gi p. IN �� A00 1i lalis\ 116 O �e� Aiwa emi II, 0 ® e n a e 0 eoa► sprig s,� . P iOiOs�1CO 00 O go L rig '� Nierriva . 0�� � � Blloyioo0 0000 d e QM q op`v 1:,���� : e�ee ee wo-0000 ooQp vk esha■ 0� ®av giam o O �= v11i' q �� �� ®Ali ®4gr. .: ■ n Le ooa s 0111 1111��0 0 �. 12 7.4.-.-0.1 v .1. or o 1 r iti � 0 W go III% 0 0E!lRJO' ' '..i. • • IN �M 1 -IIK II °i°' / . � 1; ,3lE - `e 9 . '-'711 i rv �� �: I ® ; �■ a AREAS TO BE \' 0 4 V" IN MIIIIIIP%-*' N <4fikt 6111.4 ._� 0 11 ; - - ! Ni r V ASSESSED ...f fi� a 4 i ..... e, # a lb. oiwi . l c�i . o doom ® , ry /4 OnI�Q�iao; �0 OW . J'' 00 V golds = ; ; _ AO � � p aaOCl 141 it i "4' / ; UIlI uu1113.1 iIuIfi v 1 Nall • ■"o0-���11112'11oioo■;v ■ li mo a■ ai �� M I as I . �p11C\ �/ � ��'°�oP moo° i F: a ; i iii 600a ._ 0 gioar ii • V EN a If1i# lly v ►A r' , �� ° p� • NNW A l 2 — ,„ I wo.= — Millilo it il* FAI p r' V/. mum 0 600 1200 AREAS TO BE ASSESSED Horizontal Scale in Feet lip • CITY OF CENTERVILLE, MINNESOTA FIGURE: No.2 2013 STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS C V: \1938\ACTIVE\193801520 \CAD \DWG \193801520FIGURES.DWG DATE: September 2012 COMM: 1938001520 57 I t • 4 � -- , G.-; HP � �� �� • 6001 v ���� J.,' terviffe ,� ar f. e�Eo���o�s T,, ee e9p ge �� �D p� di1L e1E ' 01.__ !m■�cii � . \ .ems. easel a eeeoeoere mstiiieiavoo pioaiiii Established 1857 . e wPo b ye II ■ DrAirl a ea. 1 0 ul� Leo . • ode 4' ly —A NP- lcc o o` 0ai cm= /. 10 s A,4 1 poolry o m�eaele eeeeel0i t �a� • / / 1i10 ..,„ �� 1111e000 a99c dodo ¢ . .::; 1 O m, I �� ��� o w oo s. �,i e eteoo c 0o� m 7 0i170I y . vo L Q1r�esd a X° 1 ;lill 'I NV ooenioll ae - °a. - °o IV � i r O b 1 O V t f -i 1 2004 STREET IMPROVEMENTS \ ItKi 2 . t♦ as ° O� I - / ] 2009 STREET IMPROVEMENTS __ , e a •= ■ Il ; In E �I a 2013 STREET IMPROVEMENTS l j!! ' Lil t _ NEN o �I�. 0 ■ _ I ,�,1v = � ■ pi Mi. STREETS TO BE PUKED IN THE , n Y *0 � > i 01.,,..."49k..1 0 0 OVERLAY PROGRAM 9� '�' ■t:II1F1 tR10� d�4:,► � STREETS FOR FUTURE RECONSTRUCTION ® v , v� �eeeea "S■" ° io - - -_ —.— PRIVATE STREETS /��� 1 V Y a . � +�" — 1 a a COUNTY ROADS ` I Oiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii _1 7 •11 _� iiiiiiQwi i� iii ..,L: 1 IIIHRA g! /Owl I ■ c M . o► r. Dill ���5�� o��t P 1 1 a i1 is 1 �',Ri Empifil 0 1200 2400 �1 �� ' :.:, Nw 1 3.":1'4141 iIiV% Horizontal Style In Feet C o ��� 4" �� 4*1 ll i H � i 1.111 t,I % • •vil ■ �m m ;=�� ** ;� ♦ : 11 1 -1 m ot •• 1 1i / W0 � �, il,4 �� /4104Ilii-. :�� 1 - l PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT PLAN OVERVIEW CITY OF CENTERVILLE, MINNESOTA FIGURE No.3 2013 STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS V: \1938yLTIVE\ 193801520 \CM\DWG\193801520FIOJRES.DWG DATE September 2012 COMM: 193801520 1 III 58 tervitte • Establishief 185; 8618 CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER 30' Q 30' TYPE I ROAD IMPROVEMENT NOTES: 2013 1. REMOVE BITUMINOUS 2. INSTALL WATER MAIN & SERVICES DESIGN CLGRADE 3. CONSTRUCT ROAD THROUGH BITUMINOUS BASE COURSE. VARIES 0.025 4. RESTORE DISTURBED TURF AND DRIVEWAYS BEHIND THE CURB 5. PERFORM 1ST STRUCTURE ADJUSTMENT 4" DRAIN TILE (TYP) 2014 12" 6. PERFORM 2ND STRUCTURE ADJUSTMENT 7. COMPLETE ALL PUNCH UST ITEMS 8. SWEEP 1 1/2" -LV3 WEARING COURSE MIXTURE, LVWE35030B (2014) 9. TACK COAT 2" - LV3 NON - WEARING COURSE MIXTURE, LVNW35030B 10. PAVE WEAR 8" CLASS 5 AGGREGATE BASE 11. SAW & SEAL WEAR COURSE 20" SELECT GRANULAR BORROW GEOTEXTILE FABRIC, TYPE V TYPICAL SECTION TYPE I ROAD IMPROVEMENTS CENTER STREET, SUMUC COURT, IVY COURT • EXISTING CURB TO REMAIN WITH SPOT REPAIRS 30' 30' ® 16' 14' TYPE II ROAD IMPROVEMENT NOTES: 2013 DESIGN QGRADE 1. REMOVE BITUMINOUS 2. COMPLETE ANY UTILITY WORK VARIES 0.025' /FT 3. INSTALL DRAINTILE 4. SPOT REPAIR CURB AS MARKED IN THE FIELD 4" DRAIN T[lE (TYP) 5. RESTORE ANY DISTURBED TURF AND DRIVEWAYS BEHIND THE CURB 6. TEST ROLL EXISTING AGGREGATE BASE TRENCHED IN 7. CORRECT SOFT SPOTS AND TOLERANCE GRAVEL BASE 8. PAVE BASE 9. PERFORM STRUCTURE ADJUSTMENTS 1 1/2" -LV3 Wearing Course Mixture, LVWE350308 10. TACK WE AR 2" - LV3 Non - Wearing Course Mixture, LVNW35030B 12. SAW &SE AL WEAR COURSE GRAVEL BASE (THIC(NESS VARIES) TYPICAL SECTION TYPE II ROAD IMPROVEMENTS PETERSON TRAIL, HAYFIELD ROAD, HOULE CIRCLE, FOX RUN TYPICAL SECTIONS • CITY OF CENTERVILLE, MINNESOTA FIGURE: No.4 2013 STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS V: \1938\ACTIVE\193801520 \CAD \DWG \193801520FIGURES.DWG DATE: September 2012 COMM: 1938001520 59 y , ,,, - 5 z1 e rrri" q.e. " 24 1 '.5*-1.7- L '' 5,( b 1 11A/ A IP 1 • U4L J L 90A. ii " id / Ara, ti,;. ei , I , au , ;: \ i 1� ' i ' � 2 ry © ® ® ©�� ® ®® © ©W ® � �" I �O 2 l i ! J ^ v I t �" I ERCE DRI 27 01.171.0T 414) T 1 Alibr 110 Ram - ' • lillliitC" ? Al 2. ill , _ 4 m � � EOF 903 5 ,: „ V 0 7r a rr:� s2 � f 9 5 - 7 �� y RA1L - 3 23 4 OW � r 5 hi > — EAGLE - AIL - -�►,.' c NINL 9 iiiiipp y ,. ! � N WL 905 0 v na 5 I ` NWI _•. I EAGLE I:. R .r T 1 } , 100 vR906 0 � .1 ' •• --*8-..i In �9 PA _ RK 12 I 7 111111111 II 1. ggRi . ' litpgr i • � � ' NWI. 898 O �. 0 a �< 2 - HV+n A39.2 o z 5 6p,,,,, 1 e 5o of f2 RcP morpo , , l iE � � � © i p In 2 : : rr, 5 ' A _ � C, ntni . � y B �) � 3 z S nn I , c �) 4 1 2 3 4 3 6 I r v ir� ,�� r.. - c / <-< SEW °�' .P` b---- l 7 1:9 371.17T F l A i A t.1 6r or Rr , t ',41714 2 3 � , L i nt _ f.� 'rte m _; � ►i�, : a� � Ar, 5,1 ' RO �(P 5 TR� ovilGT a t A 0' iAi�� c J ipp DUPRE RO I" ' � A t' 4 5 1 O 0Tl0i A I - — v" GATEWAY CIRCLE 9 lc • ■ 11 '`� 2 2 b: STREET 1 ,.. r rY /ett . , 41PAP S S T•ptdvL S EwFJr- 415 o 1 Ti o N s • • • � Y ., AL...0, • , / c% 3RN3AV S NN11 ._..._ Ivor , igt mr . 014....4 , ' ZISP . err � _ V�.iar>oo 0001001.1.00 1� _� o rb �'l p. talk o, II" -Awl I.':' ' '-'-/ : '5' olp■ lion n _,.. ... o J I iuii 3A►i!0 NYINB I 3ARl0 W ui� u : �" a D t. i t 0 11111 MI6 0 , . a IIIiIINN L o r. — GU III " 1111101.1.1 .- .illa l li j r .n. .- ' '' A ‘I ) r j U ! !! !1! M = M ,_6..._ ; .:: i Aii men . ,s7 ,41ssoutimpw RI, ..5 fr VI MN . am tionsimm g El ' wit CO _ - .., - M. oak_ i w og", Ohio up. _ ME SIM p,.,„., 1 TIM 010 a • N - MOO . . :Ki rd e gi -woo --4-, in „,,,,,40, _ ° , c, 1 / _ _ r „.., ,,, I n ,.. , 4, ,... „ .., , Li iii it „. h 5; 3i13/�13N39 15 1 , �: _. ® �'�_ - ...e. -- 4 i, T C7 i L ' l wiat * ILVAIVI310 A Si pr 7 . , ,r. < 6 1 � 111111001 ©© > kA 11 '' 11 : 11 1-4 MEM .. ;1 ^ � ,9 :0 mi a • _ ? N I ^ 1 m ( 1 Q n CSI Q' w. 5 _ W I'� n � .v 'n j J� � � l • , 6J C 50' 1 3' f 50' 1 CATCHBASIN 28,33' \ \\ 3' \ \ Y \ I , I` S' —I 5' - -I Q N 14.17' 14.17' SURMOUNTABLE CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER — 1 1/2"—LV3 Wearing Course Mixture, LVWE35O30B (2007) 2" — LV3 Non — Wearing Course Mixture, LVNW35030B 8" CLASS 5 AGGREGATE BASE 26.5" SELECT GRANULAR BORROW GEOTEXTILE FABRIC STORM SEWER CROSSINGS MATERIAL REPLACEMENT CITY OF CENTERVILLE FIG.%) 7 Bonestroo 2013 STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT 61607158E008.DWG DATE:8 /28/07 COMM: 616-07-158 III III III . . . t_ k - fir �� - - °-- 1�r �,: I 7 1 - �1 APB► «- � ` of x , • - -• 4 *-7,./6..ir - I : ,-.„.. ''.....si.:4 • . ',41'. 134 ' , • - .44. • . 70 r �' 1 +. :111::::;77'47."1": o. ! 1 ' • * r . s s + Y 1 r � I r 1�. , Viµ 7' Y M �, f '. '� 1 4 ! • / t r �~ w i a r / P R . 46 011111 • .'` • ""\-, Contours w: ` Al Legend t i- , ; i w ,: . r .. :—:. 7. ' I • k.Jjk.n a110 s . = : Fig. $ Potential BMP Locations f Center Street WI Potential Pond Expansion • t 700 50 0 100 200 300 a - N., Storm Sewer n Potential Rain Garden Location - Feet Bonestroo - _ _ .... _. __ . ■ • roe.« r.nci s •.a •14,.,. .r.,.�.e • SOD TO MATCH SOD TO MATCH EXISTING GRADE EXISTING GRADE VARIABLE WIDTH SREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH 'PVC PERFORATED DRAINTILE 2 -3" DEPTH ENTIRE WITH GEO SOCK AND PEA GRAVEL PLANTING BED er g. DESIGN GRADE ` • ` :•' ,:•:- ` LIMITS OF 0 OVER- EXCAVATION - - I - 1, r_-_-1 SOIL REPLACEMENT MIX /-, 1 1 -I 1=1 1 -J 1 l -1 75 % COARSE, WASHED SAND I( -J I I -J 1 J_ -J I I -J i J -__ 25% LEAF COMPOST 111=111=1 J I I JJ 1 -DEE 1 PI LOOSE SOILS II III III III II II / • IF STEEPER THAN 4:1 NATIVE GRASSES SHOULD BE SUBSITUTED FOR SOD INFILTRATION BASIN TYPICAL SECTION CITY OF CENTERVILLE FIGURE 9 Bonestroo • 2013 STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT 61607158F009.DWG DATE:8 /22/07 COMM: 616-07-158 64 aCT- L0.9T9 :M03 L0.8- 8:31VQ MCI awe 103CO2Id 1N3W3AO2idWI At llilfl (NV 133 tir 0) ��n�ld 311IAa31N30 4W 10 1 2 S SIN 3W3AO2idWI NOIlb 00C Ott 0 i I �; ■ N I I , I I 1 I I I I I r -. noa n�3N — < _ . f _,, .. I P41 '1 •s - 1 � I I ' f 2 n I 1 . (rrr(...r. (..r.n • 0 "......14 � 1 c r 13 C \ 0 `,� m Z c / H f -, C � 0 iv L—,. <—_. <.._..... <-- "" "n. 2 . 1 D T 0 1332l1S 0 • A 0 I ip ....--- Z I is _____71 ,.. 1....._..... ... .. , cii \.... 7 , 4111i ‘ • III • I I Appendix B: Detailed Cost Estimates • • City of Centerville Project No: 193801520 2013 Street and Utility Improvement Project �i Page 25 66 ■ Area A - 100 % Curb Removal - Full Depth Street Reconstruction - Open Cut WM - No Sidewalk Construction Project Construction Cost $868,651.86 C/L length Cost Cost Contingencies 5% 543,432.59 Center St 2000. 836,559 Engineering 30% 5260,595.56 Ivy Ct 420 s c , 169,733 Total Cost 1 $1,� Sumac Ct 420 ,,5 166,388 2840 868,652 1,172,680 Cost Per C/L Foot 2840..- 4 12.92 1 Center Street J Ivy Ct 1 Sumac Ct - Total '1o. Item 1 Units EE Unit Price Qty EE Total Price Qty EE Total Price Qty EE Total Price CL Length' 2000 420 420 STREETS: 1 MOBILIZATION LS $41,364.37 0.8 $33,091.50 0.1 54,136.44 0.1 $4,136.44 541,364.37 2 TRAFFIC CONTROL LS 55,000.00 0.8 54,000.00 0.1 6500.00 0.1 $500.00 55,000.00 3 PROTECTION OF CATCH BASIN IN STREET EA 5250.00 4 51,000.00 2 5500.00 2 $500.00 52,000.00 4 PROTECTION OF CB, NON - STREET EA 5100.00 2 $200.00 0 50.00 2 5200.00 $400.00 5 COMMON EXCAVATION (P) CY $8.00 6,806 554,444.44 1,429 $11,433.33 1,429 $11,433.33 $77,311.11 6 SUBGRADEEXCAVATION CY 58.00 200 51,600.00 100 5800.00 100 9800.00 53,20000 7 SUBGRADE PREPARATION - STREET SY $0.55 7,778 $4,277.78 1,633 $898.33 1,633 $898.33 $6,074.44 8 SELECT GRANULAR BORROW (CV) CY 512.00 4,321 $51,851.85 907 $10,888.89 907 $10,888.89 573,629.63 9 TOPSOIL BORROW (LV) CY 515.00 494 $7,407.41 104 $1,555.56 104 $1,555.56 $10,518.52 10 GEOTEXTILE FABRIC, TYPE V SY 52.00 7,778 $15,555.56 1,633 53,266.67 1.633 63,266.67 522,088.89 11 AGGREGATE BASE, CLASS 5 TN $9.00 3,422 930,800.00 719 $6,468.00 719 $6,468.00 $43,736.00 12 8618 CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER LF 511.00 4,000 544,000.00 840 59,240.00 840 59,240.00 562,480.00 13 MISC. REMOVALS LS 55,000.00 1 55,000.00 1 55,000.00 1 55,000.00 515,000.00 • 14 REMOVE CURB 8 GUTTER 15 4' PERFORATED F 53.00 4,000 512,000.00 840 52,520.00 840 52,520.00 517,040.00 RATED POLYETHYLENE PIPE LF 52.75 4,000 511,000.00 840 52,310.00 840 52.310.00 515.620.00 16 TYPE LV 3 NON WEAR COURSE MIX (B) TN $65.00 724 547,064.81 152 59,883.61 152 $9.883.61 566,832.04 17 TYPE LV 3 WEAR COURSE MIXTURE (B) TN $70.00 543 538,013.89 114 $7,982.92 114 $7,982.92 $53,979.72 18 TYPE LV 4 WEAR COURSE MIX - DRIVEWAY TN 590.00 140 512,600.00 60 55,400.00 60 55,400.00 523,400.00 19 CONCRETE DRIVEWAY RESTORATOIN SY $40.00 250 510,000.00 50 52,000.00 0 50.00 512,000.00 20 BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR TACK COAT GL 53.50 315 $1,101.85 66 $231.39 66 $231.39 $1,564.63 21 SAW AND SEAL PAVEMENT LF 61.75 4,000 57,000.00 840 51,470.00 840 $1,470.00 59,940.00 22 SODDING, LAWN TYPE SY 53.00 4,444 513,333.33 933 $2,800.00 933 52,800.00 $18,933.33 23 EXTEND HYDRANT BARREL LF 5350.00 5 51,750.00 1 5350.00 1 5350.00 52,450.00 24 ADJUST VALVE BOX EA 5250.00 1 5250.00 0 50.00 0 50.00 5250.00 25 ADJUST FRAME AND RING CASTING EA $350.00 9 53,150.00 1 5350.00 1 6350.00 53,850.00 Subtotal 5410,492.43 989,985.13 588,185.13 $588,662.69 STORM SEWER: 26 STORM SEWER CROSSING CORRECTION EA 96,000.00 3 518,000.00 1 56,000.00 1 56,000.00 530,000.00 27 CONSTRUCT RAIN GARDEN SF $3.50 4,000 514,000.00 400 51,400.00 400 51,400.00 516,800.00 28 15' RCP STORM SEWER LF $25.00 1,000 525,000.00 0 50.00 0 60.00 525,000.00 29 2'x3' CB OR 4' DIA. CBMH EA 52,000.00 7 514,000.00 0 50.00 0 $0.00 514,000.00 30 RAIN GARDEN SEEDING/BLANKET SY $1.25 444 $555.56 44 $55.56 44 555.56 5666.67 Subtotal 571,555.56 57,455.56 57,455.56 686,466.67 Total Construction Cost 6675,129.36 Contingency $33,756.47 Engineering, Etc. 5202,538.81 Total Project Costs 5911,424.63 • 67 • WATER: 31 CONNECT TO EXISTING WATERMAIN EA 51,000.00 2 52,000.00 0 50.00 0 50.00 52,000.00 32 8' PVC C900 WATER MAIN LF 535.00 2,045 $71,575.00 0 50.00 0 50.00 571.575.11 33 6' PVC C900 WATER MAIN LF 530.00 75 52,250.00 375 511,250.00 388 511,640.11 $25,140.1 34 8' GATE VALVE AND BOX EA 51,500.00 3 54,500.00 0 $0.00 0 50.00 54,500.00 35 6' GATE VALVE AND BOX EA 51,200.00 5 56,000.00 2 52,400.00 2 $2,400.00 $10,800.11 36 5' VALVE HYDRANT EA 52,500.00 5 $12,500.00 1 52,500.00 1 52,500.00 $17,500.11 37 DUCTILE IRON FITTINGS LB 54.00 2.600 510,400.00 600 52,400.00 600 52,400.00 $15,200.00 38 IMPROVED PIPE FOUNDATION LF 52.50 2,120 55,300.00 375 5937.50 388 5970.00 57,207.50 39 1' CORPORATION STOP W/ SADDLE EA 5250.00 21 55,250.00 8 52,000.00 7 51,750.00 59,000.00 40 1' CURB STOP AND BOX EA 5250.00 21 55,250.00 8 $2,000.00 7 51,750.00 59.000.11 41 1' TYPE lc COPPER WATER SERVICE LF $20.00 630 512,600.00 240 $4,800.00 210 54,200.00 521,600.01 Subtotal $137,625.00 828287.50 527,610.00 5793,522.50 Total Construction Cost $193,522.50 Contingenc $9,676.13 Engineering 558,056.7 Total Cost $261,255.38 Total Construction Cost $619,672.98 $125,728.19 5123,250.69 $868,651.86 Contingency 530,983.65 56,286.41 $6,162. $43,432.5' Engineering 5185,901.89 $37,718.46 $36,975.21 $260,595.56 Total Cost 5836,558.52 $169,733.05 5166,388.43 51,172,680.01 111 • 68 • ,. Area B Construction Cost 5368243.53 Contingencies 5% 518412.18 Engineering 30% 5110,473.06 Total Cost # 5 5_ Cost Per CIL Foot 3525 5141.03 1 Fox Run Hayfield Road Houle Circle Peterson Trail Total 1 No. Item Units EE Unit $ Qty EE Total $ I Qty 1 EE Total $ I Qty 1 EE Total $ I Qty 1 EE Total $ I BASE BID: CL LENGTH 525 740 660 1800 3525 STREETS: 1 MOBILIZATION LS 517,535.41 0.15 52,611.66 0.21 53,681.19 0.19 53,283.23 0.45 57,959.33 517,535.41 2 TRAFFIC CONTROL LS 52,500.00 0.15 $372.34 0.21 $524.82 0.19 5468.09 0.45 51,134.75 52,500.00 3 RECLAIM EXIST. BIT. SURFACING SY 52.00 1,653 53,305.56 2,330 $4,659.26 2,078 54,155.56 5,037 510,074.07 522,194.44 4 REMOVE CURB & GUTTER LF 54.00 158 $630.00 222 0888.00 198 5752.00 480 51,920.00 $4,230.00 5 4' PERFORATED POLYETHYLENE PIPE LF $7.00 210 51,470.00 296 $2,072.00 264 51,848.00 640 $4,480.00 59,870.00 6 AGGREGATE BASE COURSE, CLASS 5 TN $11.00 182 51,999.86 256 52,818.85 229 52,514.11 554 56,094.81 913,427.64 7 ADJUST FRAME AND RING CASTING EA 5210.00 3 9630.00 4 5840.00 3 5830.00 12 $2,520.00 54,620.00 8 ADJUST VALVE BOX EA 5105.00 1 5105.00 4 $420.00 3 5315.00 6 5830.00 51,470.00 9 SAW AND SEAL PAVEMENT LF 51.75 525 5918.75 740 51,295.00 660 51,155.00 1,600 52,800.00 56,168.75 10 SURMOUNTABLE CONCRETE C & G LF $20.00 158 53,150.00 222 54,440.00 198 53,960.00 480 59,600.00 $21,150.00 11 TYPE LV 3 NON WEARING COURSE MIX (6) TN $65.00 190 512,354.51 268 517,413.98 239 $15,531.39 579 537,651.85 082,951.74 12 TYPE LV 3 WEARING COURSE MIXTURE (8) TN 570.00 143 $9,978.65 201 514,065.14 179 $12,544.58 434 530,411.11 566,999.48 13 BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR TACK COAT GAL 53.50 83 5289.24 116 $407.69 104 5363.61 252 5881.48 51,942.01 14 REMOVE & REPLACE BIT. OR CONC. DWY. SY 050.00 44 52,187.50 62 53,083.33 55 52,750.00 133 56,666.67 014,687.50 15 TOPSOIL BORROW (LV) CY 524.00 76 51,820.00 107 $2,565.33 95 52,288.00 231 $5,546.67 $12,220.00 16 SODDING, LAWN TYPE SY 57.75 44 5339.06 62 5477.92 55 5426.25 133 51,033.33 52,276.56 41110 Subto STORM SEWER: 1 15' RCP STORM SEWER tal 542,162.12 559,652.51 $53,024.61 5129,404.09 9284,243.53 LF 525.00 0 $0.00 350 $8,750.00 0 $0.00 650 516,250.00 525,000.00 2 2'x3' CB OR 4 DIA. CBMH EA 52,000.00 0 50.00 2 54,000.00 0 50.00 5 510,000.00 514,000.00 17 STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENTS EA $6,000.00 3 518,000.00 3 $18,000.00 1 $6,000.00 0.5 53,000.00 $45,000.00 Subtotal 518,000.00 530,750.00 56,000.00 529,250.00 984,000.00 Total Construction Cost $60,162.12 590,402.51 559,024.81 $158,654.09 9388,243.53 Contingency 53,008.11 54,520.13 52,951.24 57,932.70 518,412.18 Engineering 518,048.64 527,120.75 517,707.44 547,596.23 5110,473.06 Total Cost 581,218.86 5122,043.39 579,683.49 5214,783.01 5497,128.77 • 69 • Appendix C: Misc. Correspondence and Information • • City of Centerville Project No: 19 380 26 2013 Street �f t and Utility Improvement Project i Page 26 70 Center Street -Sumac Ct -Ivy Ct Reconstruction 10/12/2012' • j ESTIMATED OWNER Address 'ASSESSMENT MSSP CENTERVILLE, LLC 1980 CENTER STREET' $ 13,542 LUTZ, CLIFFORD - SANDY 1850 CENTER STREET! $ 3,686 ANDERT, ANN MARIE -STEVE 1858 CENTER STREET $ 4,141 LINDGREN, LEANN 1859 CENTER STREET $ 4,141 MEADER, MARK 1866 CENTER STREET1 $ 4,141 PADRNOS, CORY 1874 CENTER STREET $ 4,141 City Pond $ MICKLE, JAMES 1882 CENTER STREET' $ 4,141 PELOQUIN, TIMOTHY - CATHERINE 1889 CENTER STREET! 4,200 MEHSIKHOMER, WALTER 1890 CENTER STREET' $ 4,200 THEIS, KEN - SHARON _ 1901 CENTER STREET; $ 4,200 HAMLIN, TRAVIS 1902 CENTER STREET 1 $ 4,141 THORPE, KATIE - MATTHEW 11909 CENTER STREET' $ 4,141 LUND, DAVID 11917 CENTER STREET, $ 4,141 SAILOR, LARRY - PAM '1925 CENTER STREET $ 4,141 HOLMAY, NICHOLAS - COR I 1933 CENTER STREET $ 4,141 STREIER, HEATHER 11934 CENTER STREET $ 4,200 BEHREND, JON J. 11941 CENTER STREET $ 4,200 STROHMAN, DMITRI 't949 CENTER STREET" $ 4,141 HANSON, BRIAN - LISA 1950 CENTER STREET! $ 4,200 GRAFSKY, DAVID - DIANA 1 1957 CENTER STREET' $ 4,141 RODRIGUEZ, WAYNE 1 1960 CENTER STREET $ 4,200 JESSE ANDERSON, JENNIFER LEZALLA 1965 CENTER STREET $ 4,141_ III WEMELE, CRAIG 6948 IVY COURT $ 4,141 LUTZ, SUSAN 1970 CENTER STREET $ 4,141 STEPHAN, ROB 6907 SUMAC COURT $ 4,141 , CHEE AH THAO _ _ 6908 SUMAC COURT $ 4,141 FRISON, KURT 16913 SUMAC COURT $ 4,141 MARTINEZ, DANIEL 6918 SUMAC COURT $ 4,141 HOLLENKAMP, RICK 6922 DUPRE RD $ 1,698 BILLINGSLEY, DAVID - MARY 6923 SUMAC COURT $ 4,141 STEELE, JOSEPH - CHERYLANN 6926 SUMAC COURT 4,141 KALLSTROM, WAYNE - DEBRA 6927 IVY COURT $ 4,200 PAULSEN, JASON 6928 IVY COURT $ 4,200 KOWARSCH, LUKE 6933 SUMAC COURT 1 $ 4,200 ELLIS, LOREN - DEBRA 6935 IVY COURT $ 4,141 ARNT, ALEX 6936 IVY COURT $ 4,141 ZYCH, RONALD - RACHEL 6943 IVY COURT $ 4,141 DEYO, ANGILA - DANIEL 6944 IVY COURT $ 4,141 HER, BRANDON & DER 6947 IVY COURT $ 4,141 BGL PARTNERSHIP 6939 20th Ave. $ 13,542 $ 182,138 III 71 1 r 3 Wi CCO I N T.' Z W T. m' < O 0 r 0 0 a' - 0 W W 2' < T (A' 2 W O.0 Z 3 O 2 <:G) Z O C�', 0 T W O' 3 O W W 0 O W 0 O M z D Dig r M r70 O r'O C O c,m 7, m C D M rn D D m a m'm � M plm � - T � C DD -- ..03!OI7 ? r<!1-2m!(n -rn Z = 7ZZc rn <r D W ,r in r r - - . > 1 . 7 . Y =M r m - D -0� 0 m C7 m� ZD - W� -4r � 2 x O _ Zpx< OD W Z1C, PC W33 - m D G) r Z 32 ` Cn?- Z � mZOZm2v -11- w_ >cmmvr - ,0 >x � D m c zompxooz. z fa o m�Ov�Z� _ - 1— �C G)W - m -i 00 i� rmz � - i1 zx— 2WD � 7)- !x m ?� . -I - m 3 W' -- ? W-> r - n 2m Wi w 4 , . : 7) 2 _ m D.`m� 3 c _u m,„, xj _1 m� mD 0- r m D m z 7C m m 0 r Z v O D;x 3 0 D 2 Dm0 -1 !ZO ! 2� � c. D D D '� D v 0 D w N z ‹? z o >K>76 3 o< mD z W0�O73 m � - -a D' rn < D' 3 D O- < D z � I� -< O r dim < C1 -0 _1 m 2-0-IM Z D i m p ? m m y m'� W m m�Z - T 7C rn N ;2 < W m-1 -< v r D 0 r �I x , c p2 r 'Z- vm� -G 2 2- (A-1 X0 Z� _ir- MKm� m D -I �0D c_., Zm, � O - mw n m m W n 0 -<O M Km Z W rn 3 0 7i o!Km c_-'0K z Y. z { m ' w z=O,<z m m O W _ r m 0 2 m 2 2 C 1X W O ` - m m 2 y C_ — C ti m m, m -� 3 rn m v 0 m X , CWm v � �zi r mOm z I m m 7 0 a !z z = 0 o D m in 0 0 Z W T C m Z -A 0 V V V -4 -4 r VIViV V -.4!-4H4 -4 V ._. 11 1.1:........... .1: 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ili .... 1 -__.._ 1 J 1 ; � _ N 1 1 �. 1 1 1' 1 1 1 i -vi -A 1 -Aco OppD CO ! CO CO CO O CO CO CO CO . O Co CO' OD'.CO CO i2 CO CO CO CO CO CO Co!ODICD CO CO CO CO CO CD CO''r CO Co O .CO CO ,y �N QpDp -4, -4, CD p� '0110 0(� !AiA WW w m .; 0 AIWw co N N N N :X Oc A 4b. to W no Na N -.1-. cp W N N N'. -. !W A CDICn O V A'N ? - i op O •-A pr O ! i;V1 N W. CO W C -4 A W O!-+ x O V! -i CAN (O'CO A W CO.V;O Oo O N O AIW'V CO ?'WIO T 'o v - o -- - O M M' - 0I - 17 T M'3 3 2 2 112 2 2 2!2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2!2 2 212'2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2;2 211 11 T1 T1 11 11 m' fl - n - ni-1 fD tD N (D fD (D N Q) (D (D W W! W fD M p) p) 0 0 2 ! O 0 0 0' 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 W: W W W W W W W W W W W W W o 0 o X o 0 o CI X o 0 !, O ( p ( p r p � m (p ' Ql ! fD (D W dt (D fD N 7 5 ' C C: ! 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C: 0 c s �G `•C G G ' "' X X X X X X x X X X X X rn m m 0 m m m m 0 m m m m m -1 =f m mmma mmmm _'f . .1 . . . . .T7 . Z1 . .T1 .Z1' 2 0 00 0 0 0 O� ! 0 o v, v mmmco.m'mmm 0 0 0 0 0 o O O j0 O ; I O p pop p o nl n n o. 0 0.0. n:a n a a s a n Q. n o. a a!n!n 3 7 3> j 3>> j m 17 ° -i -� ��!� -� c � m n c ci i a c <� 0 '0 p 0 ' 0 ' 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0'0 N W v W'.NW @ @ @ i� @ 6EI� 6_'1 N N fD'fD (D (is NifD fD (D (D CD fD fD fD W ' W W W:W W W N W W W W'W N EA 40 4N 4, 63 4a 4A 4A,ov4A V► 4a.4fl'4A 49 ok t.9 4A 4A 4,9 4w4A 49 iN 63 4N 4fl 4A to 4A 4.9 40149 d! 49 4R 49 4H 6) 40 49 4, 4fl'49i4o 40 40::9;4,, 4A 49 ;4914,1 49 40!4,1'49 Z > m C NO pp _ L Q _., p _. - p p p p � pp p p - p -. p 1 p ' - p - p pp+ A N N C ,, pp N N N.N N N N N Cp N N N U U NjN N N N 1 1 p 1 p 11�: ... N o!m N N NIN N mv!N W O f A A A A A AIA A A.A A A A O� Cn O W N N � . N;N N N O N N N NJ -.4.43 W Wi� t CD CD o A OD A W !OD V � ! N % 'N N N ' . N NN� 'N G) — .. -' -- m m 6) 41 4!f 4 4 19 49 4A40 49 W4AI.4A 49 W4 49 4",,00 4!! 4. . to 4 1 6 40 40 4940 4n d/ 40!4040►"40C4n -4n 4 4n H 4 . 9 40 •.. . . 4 0 ;00 40 41.9 4n E9 "1 > • m (n D N 1 -A ,!1 1 -t-t m O � A A N N N'�N N NIN!N N N NN N N N N N N,N N N 1,1 1 NN'N N NN N N N N N� m o cn oo oo oo!ao m ao oo oO OO OO o m b o, it 1 O O On c '' o o o o o c o �r -i ((�, o o o o aw io o :oio c. V o o 0 0 0 0 o o o o o m o O Wpp 12 12 i it Tin pp ppp pp pp Q V 5 tO N A O O 201010 0 0 0 O O 0 .1A A in At0 V V Q) V p� tO V' - O O O O O A O O O Z O c0 A jA � i� ? A A�A A A A D 72 A A A O) -- O.W N N -i'. N.N N N N N N N'VIW W W It E? (0 Cry Q) N A Oo A:CD'00 V N N N N'W N N N N,N • • III • ESTIMATED COSTS TO CONNECT TO CITY WATER -2013 On- Project Estimate Lateral Connection Fee $ 6,350 (For properties not specially assessed for watermain) Water Trunk Fee $ 1,800 Water Meter $ 400 Permits /Inspection $ 400 Service line bored to home (est 65 ft @ $25/ft) $ 1,625 Connection inside home $ 875 Service Line Total $ 2,500 $ 5,100 • Estimated Total Cost $ 11,450 • 73 ESTIMATED COSTS TO CONNECT TO CITY WATER -2013 • Off - Project Estimate Lateral Connection Fee $ 6,350 (For properties not specially assessed for watermain) Water Trunk Fee $ 1,800 Water Meter $ 400 Permits /Inspection $ 400 Service line bored to home (est 65 ft @ $30 /ft) $ 1,950 Connection inside home $ 1,600 Connec to curb stop $ 2,100 Restoration of blvd $ 500 Misc /Mobilization /Contingency $ 1,000 Service Line Total $ 7,150 • $ 9,750 Estimated Total Cost $ 16,100 • 74 CITY OF CENTERVILLE RESOLUTION #12- • REIMBURSEMENT RESOLUTION ASSOCIATED WITH IMPROVEMENT BONDS WHEREAS, the City of Centerville, Minnesota (the "City ") desires to construct needed public improvements in 2013 -2015 (Improvements) and; WHEREAS, in connection with the Improvements, the City intends to authorize the issuance of general obligation bonds (the "Bonds ") in an aggregate amount not to exceed $1,700,000, and; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT: In order to comply with Federal Treasury Regulations 1.150 -2, the City Council states that the City intends to reimburse expenditures for Improvements with proceeds of the Bonds, by making the following declaration: 1) The City reasonably expects to reimburse itself for the expenditures made for engineering, surveying, appraisals, right of way acquisition and other costs related to the Improvements with proceeds from the issuance of bonds. 2) The maximum principal amount of debt, including expected to be issued for reimbursement purposes including bond issuance costs is $1,700,000 which may 1111 be issued in one or more series. 3) A reimbursement allocation of the expenditures for the Improvements with the proceeds of the borrowing described here will occur not later than 18 months after the later of (i) the date on which the expenditure is paid, or (ii) the date the Improvement is placed in service, but in no event more than three (3) years after the original expenditure is paid. A reimbursement allocation is an allocation in writing that evidences the City's use of the proceeds of the debt to be issued for the City to reimburse the City for a capital expenditure made pursuant to this Resolution. 4) This Resolution is adopted to indicate the intent of the City only, and does not bind the City to construct any portion of the Improvement or to issue any obligations of the City. Adopted by the City Council this day of , 2012. Tom Wilharber, Mayor Attest: • Teresa Bender, Clerk 75