HomeMy WebLinkAbout2014-05-14 CC Packet CITY OF CENTERVILLE COUNCIL MEETING &
[ teryiffe EXECUTIVE SESSION AGENDA
y 2014 May 14
Wednesday, ,
6:30 p.m. or shortly thereafter
OPEN FORUM 6:30 P.M.: An opportunity for members of the public to address the City Council on items not on
the current agenda. Items requiring Council action may be deferred to Staff or Boards and Commissions for research
and future Council Agendas if appropriate. You will be limited to two (2) minutes and we ask that you conduct
yourself in a professional, courteous manner and refrain from the use of profanity. Failure to abide by this policy
may result in the loss of your privilege to speak. Persons wishing to speak will be required to complete a sign-up
sheet and give it to the Mayor or a Staff person prior to 6:00 p.m.
COUNCIL MEETING
I. CALL TO ORDER
1. Roll Call
III. AWARDS/PRESENTATIONS/APPEARANCES
1. Mr. Ken Tolzmann, SAMA(City Assessor) (Pages 1-50)
2. Mr. Lou Suski, Gaughan Companies,Realtor, City Owned Property—Update
IV. PUBLIC HEARING
1. None.
V. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
VI. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
1. April 23,2014 City Council Meeting Minutes (Pages 51-56)
2. April 9, 2014 City Council Joint Work Session Meeting Minutes (Pages 57-58)
VII. CONSENT AGENDA
1. City of Centerville April 10, 2014 through April 23,2014 Claims (Check#28649-
28675) (Pages 59-60)
2. Centennial Police Department Claims through May 8,2014 (Check#9872-9907)
(Pages 61-63)
3. Centennial Fire District Claims through May 1,2014 (Check#6346-6391)
w/Check#6335-6345 Payroll (Page 64-66)
4. Successful Performance Review,Mr. Paul Palzer,Building Official/Public Works
Director(Completes 20 Years)
VIII. OLD BUSINESS
1. Anoka County Fire Protection Council Joint Powers Agreement(Pages 67-78)
**Tabled 4/23/14**
2. Centerville Road Utilities **Tabled 4/23/14**
IX. NEW BUSINESS
1. Approval of Special Assessment Agreement with R&R Leasing for
Reimbursement of Flood Plain Study Costs (Pages 79-85)
2. Consider Acquiring of Vacant Shoreline Abutting Trailside Park(Centerville
Lake) from St. Paul Regional Water Services (Page 86)
X. ANNOUNMENTS/UPDATES
1. Administrator Larson
XI. CLOSED EXECUTIVE SESSION (Administrator Performance Review) (Closed unless
otherwise Opened)
XII. ADJOURNMENT
"REMINDERS"
City Council Meeting-May 28, 2014, 6:30 p.m. (Council Chambers)
Planning& Zoning Commission Meeting-June 3, 2014, 6:30 p.m. (Council Chambers)
Parks & Recreation Committee Meeting-June 4, 2014, 6:30 p.m. (Council Chambers)
City Council Meeting-June 11, 2014, 6:30 p.m. (Council Chambers)
City Hall Closed in Observance of Memorial Day-May 26, 2014
Garage Sale Days-June 13 & 14, 2014, 8:00 a.m. -4:00 p.m.
Clean Up Day- rune 211 2 Q 14, 8:00 w m. Y.iai. (LU2ViADiU. Paf11, P ad&i11g LUL— Mail: MaIIagcIIlcnl,
Electronic Recycling, Florescent Bulb Recycling, Paper Shredding & Bicycle Recycling)
Hydrant Flushing—Week of May 12, 2014
Register for the 5K/8K Run, Parade & Garage Sale Days on-line!
PARK USAGE RESERVATIONS
Ms. Jaci Smetana, Fitness Classes, Parking Lot, Football/Soccer Fields/Shelter, LaMotte Park—April 28
through October 31, 2014, Monday through Thursdays from 5:30-6:30 a.m.
Centennial Little League, Ball field#3, #4 and possibly#5, LaMotte Park-April 1 through August 1,
2014, Monday through Fridays from 4:00 p.m. to dark
Centennial Soccer Club, Fields #1, #2 and 11, LaMotte Park-April 1 through July 26, 2014, 5:30 p.m. to
sunset&Acorn Creek
Hmong Flag Football Tournament, LaMotte Park-May 31,through June 1, 2014, 9:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m.
(Set up on Friday evening)
Cub Scout Pack 432 Picnic &Rocket Launch-LaMotte Park, June 7, 2014, 8:00 a.m. to 1:00 p.m.
(Mutually Agreed Use w/Wu Long Karate, LLC for Use)
Wu Long Karate—LaMotte Park, June 7, 2014, 8:00 a.m. to 12:00 p.m. (Mutually Agreed Use w/Cub
,out Pack 432)
Centennial Soccer Club, Soccer, Fields #1,#2 and 11, LaMotte Park—August 1 through October 31,
2014, 5:30 p.m. to Sunset(Monday, Wed. & Fridays) (Mutually Agreed Use w/CYF)
Centennial Youth Football, Fields #1, #2 and 11, LaMotte Park—August 1 through October 31, 2014,
5:00 p.m. to 7:30 p.m. (Tues., Thurs. & Saturday Early Morning/Late Afternoon(Mutually Agreed Use
w/CSC)
Centennial Baseball Boosters, 5K/8K Run- LaMotte Park Trails— September 27, 2014, 6:30 a.m. to 11:00
a.m.
Kenneth A. Tolzmann, SAMA
Centerville City Assessor
TO: City of Centerville Councilmember's and Residents
c/o Mr. Dallas Larson, City Administrator
FROM: Kenneth A. Tolzmann, SAMA#1939
Centerville City Assessor
DATE: April 15, 2014
RE: 2014 Pay 2015 Assessment Report
Introduction
I have prepared this 2014 Assessment Report for use by the City Council and Residents.
The Assessment Report includes general information about both the appeals and
assessment process, as well as specific information regarding this 2014 assessment.
Minnesota Statutes establish specific requirements for the assessment of property. The
law requires that all real property be valued at market value, which is defined as the usual
or most likely selling price as of January 2, 2014.
The estimated market values established for this 2014 assessment are based upon actual
real estate market trends of City of Centerville properties taking place from October 1
2012 through September 30, 2013. From these trends our mass appraisal system is used
to determine individual property values. Property owners who have questions or
concerns regarding the market value set for their property are asked to contact me prior to
this meeting. This allows me the opportunity to answer any questions they might have. I
have found that a large number of property owner concerns can be resolved by
discussion.
If I am unable to resolve a property owner's concerns regarding their market value, the
appeal can be brought to this local Board of Appeal and Equalization.
The 2014 Assessment Summary
As previously mentioned, State Statutes require all real property within the City of
Centerville to be valued at market value as of the January 2nd assessment date. The 2014
assessment has met all assessment standards set by the State of Minnesota.
Statistically,based upon the 47 qualified sales within the City during this sales period,
and after value adjustments made accordingly by zone, the final result was an assessment
that qualifies as"excellent"in the eyes of the Minnesota Dept. of Revenue with a median
of 94.3 and a coefficient of dispersion of 7.2, and a Price Related Differential of 101.
1
Changes made to this 2013 assessment from the 2012 assessment were as follows:
All residential buildings were adjusted Countywide based on size/quality.
Adjustments to land were:
Zone 3 (northside average) no change
Zone 4 (acreage sites)—+5%
Zone 5 (lakeshore) no changes
Zone 6 (southside avg) +5%
Zone 7 (above avg) +5%
Zone 8 (average townhomes) +10% also removal of obsolescence
Zone 9 (above avg townhomes) +10% also removal of obsolescence
With respect to commercial/industrial parcels,there were no changes made to the land or
building schedules.
In summary, we saw the overall estimated market value of the City increase by 12.8% for
this 2014 assessment is a considerable improvement from the 2.8%increase we observed
for last year. Preliminary indications are, that we have seen the worst of the fall in real
estate values here in Centerville. This turnaround in market values in the City is due to a
continued reduction in the number of bank owned properties for sale, as well as the
continued rebound of the real estate market metro wide for this past year.
Conclusion
As your City Assessor, it is my priority to represent your community with utmost dignity
and respect, and to make every property owner feel as though they are being heard. It is
my hope that through explanation, and discussion, there can be a better understanding.
If there are any questions from members of the City Council or City Staff, or City
Residents,please do not hesitate to call me. I am available to City residents always
during normal business hours and by appointment on evenings and weekends.
In closing, I would like to take this opportunity to thank the City of Centerville for
allowing me the privilege of serving as your City Assessor. I can assure you that I take
the responsibilities of those duties most seriously.
If you or anyone has questions relating to property tax assessment, I would be most
pleased to discuss these issues with you. You can reach me at my office at(651) 464-
4862 or my cell at(612) 865-2149.
Sincerely,
/s/
Kenneth A. Tolzmann, SAMA#1939
Centerville City Assessor
2
City of Centerville
Board ofualization Meeting
Eq
Centerville, Minnesota
M terviffe
/� IBRO.nfain.Street,Crntcnd(!r,WN-55038
F—cfab(ishetf laYS; 651-429-3232 orIALC651-429-8629
Ken MOA Tbh" r4,S4M4
cawwmwo cirrya or
.4n Oast JA=kfIffm9ftIs- efia ai dfbr
4003r fj m f to 7f I4 anormgy Iw from
&mIbatmwA,&wc&GbVL
Carmlarfb/a wary* aab lb mb&
3 1
City of Centerville
Table of Contents
AssessmentCalendar........................................................................................................................3
The2014 Assessment........................................................................................................................4
Quintile.................................................................................................................................................5
Reassessment....................................................................................................................................6
MarketValue.......................................................................................................................................6
Authority of the Local Board of Appeal and Equalization..................................................................7
MarketValues...................................................................................................................................11
2013-2014 Market Value Comparison.............................................................................................12
Residential Appraisal System...........................................................................................................13
SalesStudies....................................................................................................................................13
SalesStatistics Defined....................................................................................................................14
Current Sales Study Statistics..........................................................................................................15
2014 Anoka County Ratio Study......................................................................................................15
Residential Tax Changes Examined................................................................................................15
2013 Real Estate Tax Information ...................................................................................................16
AppealsProcedure...........................................................................................................................18
Sample Market Value Notice............................................................................................................19
Sample Property Tax Statement......................................................................................................20
Minneapolis Area Board of Realtors 2013 Residential Real Estate Report..................................23
4 2
City of Centerville
2014 Assessment Calendar
January 2 2014 Market Values for Property Established
February 1 Final Day to Deliver Assessment Records to County
F
February 1 Final Day to File for an Exemption from Taxation
March 1 Final day to file for 1 b with Commissioner of Revenue
March 16 2014 Valuation Notices Mailed
Aril 13 Local Board of Appeal and Equalization
April 30 Final Day to File a Tax Court Petition for 2011 Assessment
May 15 First Half Payable 2014 Taxes Due
May 29 Final Date for Manufactured homes assessed as personal
property to establish homestead
May 31 State Board of Equalization
4 -_ ,
"' June 16 County Board of Appeal and Equalization(6:00 PM)
- July 1 2014 Assessment Finalized
Date b which taxable property July 1 Y p perty becomes exempt
August 15 Final Day to File for 2013 Property Tax Refund
g Au ust 31 Final Day to Pay the First Half Manufactured Home Taxes
.v . X. 9
September 1 2014 Abstract to the Department of Revenue
October 15 Second Half Pay 2014 Taxes Due
November 15 Anticipated Day to mail Pay 2015 Proposed Tax Notices
December 1 Last Day to Establish Homestead for pay 2015
December 15 Final Day to File Homestead Application for pay 2015
5 3
City of Centerville
The 2014 Assessment
The 2014 assessment should be a reflection of the 2013 market conditions. Sales of
property are constantly analyzed to chart the activity of the market place. The
Assessing staff does not create value;they only measure its movement.
Assessing property values equitably is part science, part judgment and part
communication skill. Training as an assessor cannot tell us how to find the "perfect'
value of a property, but it does help us consistently produce the same estimate of
value for identical properties. That after all, is the working definition of equalization.
As of January 2, 2014, there were 1,577 parcel/accounts in the City. That is
essentially the same as from 2013. This total includes:
• 1,387 residential parcels
• 96 non-taxable parcels
• 83 commercial and industrial parcels
• 2 apartment/nursing home/man. housing parcels
• 0 manufactured home accounts
• 1 personal property accounts
• 0 railroad parcels
• 8 agricultural parcels
• 0 utility parcels
Current state law mandates that all property must be re-assessed each year and
physically reviewed once every five years. We also inspect all properties with new
construction each year. During 20131 reviewed 347 existing properties..
6 4
City of Centerville
For the 2014 Assessment, parcels located in Section 14(north of Main St.)as well
as parcels in Section 15(located east of Main St.)were reviewed by an on site
inspection. Also reviewed,were all townhornes located within the City.
7 5
City of Centerville
Reassessment
State Statute reads: "All real property subject to taxation shall be listed and
reassessed every year with reference to its value on January 2nd preceding the
assessment." This has been done, and the owners of property in Centerville
have been notified of any value change. Minnesota Statute 273.11 reads: "All
property shall be valued at its market value." It further states that "In estimating
and determining such value, the Assessor shall not adopt a lower or different
standard of value because the same is to serve as a basis for taxation, nor shall
the assessor adopt as a criterion of value the price for which such property
would sell at auction or at a forced sale, or in the aggregate with all the property
in the town or district, but the assessor shall value each article or description of
property by itself, and at such sum or price as the assessor believes the same to
be fairly worth in money." The Statute says all property shall be valued at
market value, not may be valued at market value. This means that no factors
other than market factors should affect the Assessor's value and the subsequent
action by the Board of Equalization.
Market Value
Market value has been defined many different ways. One way used by many
appraisers is the following:
The most probable price that a property should bring in a competitive and open
market under all conditions requisite to a fair sale, the buyer and seller each
acting prudently and knowledgeably, and assuming the price is not affected by
any undue stimulus. Implicit in this definition is the consummation of a sale as
of a specified date and the passing of title from seller to buyer under conditions
whereby:
(1) buyer and seller are typically motivated:
(2) both parties are well informed or well advised, and acting in what they
consider their own best interests;
(3) a reasonable time is allowed for exposure in the open market;
(4) payment is made in terms of cash in U.S. dollars or in terms of financial
arrangements comparable thereto;
(5) the price represents the normal consideration for the property sold
unaffected by special or creative financing or sales concessions granted
by anyone associated with the sale.
8 6
City of Centerville
Authority of the Open Book Local Board format
How An Open Book Meeting Works
This years Open Book meeting to be held April 30th & May 1 st at the Anoka
County Govt Center, is to discuss concerns relating to the 2014 Estimated
Market Value for Taxes Payable in 2015. The Assessor's Office cannot address
an appeal of the taxes or the 2013 Estimated Market Value for Taxes Payable in
2014 at the Open Book Meeting. An appeal of the 2013 Estimated Market
Value can only be appealed through the Minnesota Tax Court at this time.
Please visit the Minnesota Tax Court website at www.taxcourt.state.mn.us.
At the Open Book meeting you will be asked to fill out a registration form with
your name, mailing address, phone numbers where you can be reached and a
property address for the property you are inquiring about. Please bring your
2014 Notice of Valuation and Classification for Taxes Payable in 2015.
We attempt to have property owners meet with the appraiser who works in your
neighborhood. There is sometimes a significant wait. If you do not want to wait
for the appraiser who works in your neighborhood, please relay this to the clerk
handling the check in. You may not be called in order of arrival if you wish to
wait for the appraiser assigned to your neighborhood.
Please bring copies of any documentation supporting your claim of
overvaluation such as a recent market analysis or sales of comparable
properties in your neighborhood. Please keep in mind, market analysis are
generally not adjusted for differences between the subject and sale
comparables. In order to properly appraise a property, adjustments must be
completed. Note: Estimated market values of your neighbor's properties do not
support a claim of overvaluation of your property.
If you recently purchased your property on the open market or have a recent
appraisal within the past year, please call Ken Tolzmann, the Centerville City
Assessor at 651 464-4862 before the Open Book meeting.
At the meeting, the appraiser will review any documentation you have and
review with you the property characteristics we have recorded on your property.
They will also discuss market value and how we have estimated the value of
your property. We will make every effort to address questions you have
concerning the valuation of your property.
If we feel a review is warranted, we will make an appointment. This inspection is
necessary to ensure the property characteristics, such as condition, are
accurately reflected in our database.
No adjustment to the estimated market value will be made without an interior
inspection of the property.
A letter will be sent to you with the result of this review. If you disagree with the
results of this review and believe you still could not sell your property for the
County's estimated market value, you may wish to appeal your value to the
County Board of Appeal and Equalization or the Minnesota Tax Court. See
additional information regarding appeal options on our website.
These meetings, whether open book or the traditional Local Board of Appeal,
are required to be held between April 1st and May 31st; and the clerk of the
Board of Appeal and Equalization is required to give published and posted
notice at least ten days before the date set for the first meeting.
9 7
City of Centerville
Traditional Local Board of Appeal & Equalization:
The Board of Appeal and Equalization of any city, unless a longer period is
approved by the Commissioner of Revenue, must complete its work and adjourn
within twenty days (20) from the time of convening specified in the notice of the
clerk. No action taken subsequent to such date shall be valid.
A request for additional time in order to complete the work of the Board of
Appeal and Equalization must be addressed to the Commissioner of Revenue in
writing. The Commissioner's approval is necessary to legalize any procedure
subsequent to the expiration of the twenty-day period. The Commissioner of
Revenue will not, however, extend the time for local Boards of Appeal and
Equalization to meet beyond the time when the County Board of Equalization
meets, which is the final two weeks of June.
The authority of the local Board extends over the individual assessments of real
and personal property. The Board does not have the power to increase or
decrease by percentage all of the assessments in the district of a given class of
property. Changes in aggregate assessments by classes are made by the
County Board of Equalization.
Although the Local Board of Appeal and Equalization has the authority to
increase or reduce individual assessments, the total of such adjustments must
not reduce the aggregate assessment made by the Assessor by more than one
percent of said aggregate assessment. If the total of such adjustments does
lower the aggregate assessment made by the Assessor by more than one
percent, none of the adjustments will be allowed. This limitation does not apply,
however, to the correction of clerical errors or to the removal of duplicate
assessments.
The Local Board of Appeal and Equalization does not have the authority in any
year to reopen former assessments on which taxes are due and payable. The
Board considers only the assessments that are in process in the current year.
Adjustment can be made only by the process of abatement or by legal action.
In reviewing the individual assessments, the Board may find instances of
undervaluation. Before the Board can raise the market value of property it must
notify the owner. The law does not prescribe any particular form of notice
except that the person whose property is to be increased in value must be
notified of the intent of the Board to make the increase. The Local Board of
Appeal and Equalization meetings assure a property owner an opportunity to
contest any other matter relating to the taxability of their property. The Board is
required to review the matter and make any corrections that it deems just.
10 s
City of Centerville
When a Local Board of Appeal and Equalization convenes, it is necessary that a
majority of the members be in attendance in order that any valid action may be
taken. The local assessor is required by law to be present with his/her
assessment books and papers. He/she is required also to take part in the
proceedings but has no vote. In addition to the local assessor, the county
assessor or one of his/her assistants is required to attend. The Board should
proceed immediately to review the assessments of property. The Board should
ask the local assessor and county assessor to present any tables that have
been prepared, making comparisons of the current assessments in the district.
The county assessor is required to have maps and tables relating particularly to
land values for the guidance of Boards of Appeal and Equalization.
Comparisons should be presented of assessments of types of property with
previous years and with other assessment districts in the same county.
It is the primary duty of each Board of Appeal and Equalization to examine the
assessment record to see that all taxable property in the assessment district has
been properly placed upon the list and valued by the assessor. In case any
property, either real or personal, has been omitted; the Board has the duty of
making the assessment.
The complaints and objections of persons who feel aggrieved with any
assessments for the current year should be considered very carefully by the
Board. Such assessments must be reviewed in detail and the Board has the
authority to make corrections it deems to be just. The Board may recess from
day to day until all cases have been heard. If complaints are received after the
adjournment of the Board of Appeal and Equalization they must be handled on
the staff level; as a property owner cannot appear before a higher board unless
he or she has first appeared at the lower board levels.
Pursuant to Minnesota Statute 274.01: The Board may not make an individual
market value adjustment or classification change that would benefit the property
in cases where the owner or other person having control over the property will
not permit the assessor to inspect the property and the interior of any buildings
or structures.
A non-resident may file written objections to his/her assessment with the county
assessor prior to the meeting of the Board of Appeal and Equalization. Such
objections must be presented to the Board for consideration while it is in
session.
11 9
City of Centerville
Before adjourning, the Board of Appeal and Equalization should cause the
record of the official proceedings to be prepared. The law requires that the
proceedings be listed on a separate form which is appended to the assessment
book. The assessments of omitted property must be listed in detail and all
assessments that have been increased or decreased should be shown as
prescribed in the form. After the proceedings have been completed, the record
should be signed and dated by the members of the Board of Appeal and
Equalization. It is the duty of the county assessor to enter changes by Boards of
Appeal and Equalization in the assessment book of each district.
The Local Board of Appeal and Equalization has the opportunity of making a
great contribution to the equality of all assessments of property in a district. No
other agency in the assessment process has the knowledge of the property
within a district that is possessed jointly by the individual members of a Board of
Appeal and Equalization. The County or State Board of Equalization cannot
give the detailed attention to individual assessments that is possible in the
session of the Local Board. The faithful performance of duty by the Local Board
of Appeal and Equalization will make a direct contribution to the attainment of
equality in meeting the costs of providing the essential services of local
government.
12 10
City of Centerville
Market Value
The 2014 assessment should be a reflection of the 2013 market conditions. Sales of
property are constantly analyzed to chart the activity of the market place.
After thorough studies of the sales in the market place are conducted, we establish the
assessed value of all real property. During the 2013 study period, we recorded 78 sales,
of which we considered 47 to be "arms-length" sales. There were 18 bank/foreclosure
sales in Centerville during 2013.
In accordance with the results of these sales studies, upward land adjustments were made
to most areas of the city with overall building increases (based on style) of approximately
10%.
According to the Minneapolis Area Association of Realtors, the average home sales
price in Centerville rose 5.4% between 2012 and 2013 to a current median value of
$189,950. This is somewhat of a decrease from the 16.4% increase in the median
home value observed last year. This is a result of the continued reduction of bank
owned property in this area, as well as the continued demand for homes in the City.
The 2014 assessment that is up for your review has a total overall market value of
$296,495,221. It reflects an approximate valuation increase of 12.8% compared to the
2013 assessment of 259,236,688. This is an improvement from the 2.1% decline
observed in last years assessment.
Included in this total is $3,999,400 in new construction added to the tax roll for work
completed in the City during 2013.
13 11
City of Centerville
2012-2013 Market Value Comparison
2014 ASSESSMENT
PERCENT OF TOTAL MARKET VALUE
APARTMENTS
.2%
COMMERCIAL
3.7% ■APARTMENTS
:;. O COMMERCIAL
D INDUSTRIAL
s
a RESIDENTIAL
RESIDENTIAL
96.1%
14 12
City of Centerville
Residential Appraisal System
Per State Statute, each property must be physically inspected and individually
appraised once every five years. For this individual appraisal, or in the event of an
assessed value appeal, we use two standard appraisal methods to determine and verify
the estimated market value of our residential properties:
1. First, an appraiser inspects each property to verify data. If we are unable to view
the interior of a home on the first visit, a notice is left requesting a return telephone
call from the owner to schedule this inspection. Interior inspections are necessary
to confirm our data on the plans and specifications of new homes and to determine
depreciation factors in older homes.
2. To calculate the estimated market value from the property data we use a Computer
Assisted Mass Appraisal (CAMA) system
based on a reconstruction less depreciation
No method of appraisal. The cost variables and
land schedules are developed through an
analysis of stratified sales within the city. This
method uses the "Principle of Substitution" and
calculates what a buyer would have to pay to
replace each home today less age dependent
depreciation.
3. A comparative market analysis is used to verify these estimates. The properties
used for these studies are those that most recently have sold and by computer
analysis, are most comparable to the subject property taking into consideration
construction quality, location, size, style, etc. The main point in doing a market
analysis is to make sure that you are comparing "apples with apples". This will
make the comparable properties "equivalent to" the subject property and establish a
probable sale price of the subject.
These three steps give us the information to verify our assessed value or to adjust it if necessary.
Sales Studies
According to State Law, it is the assessor's job to appraise all real property at market
value for property tax purposes. As a method of checks and balances, the
Department of Revenue uses statistics and ratios relating to assessed market value
and current sale prices to confirm that the law is upheld. Assessors use similar
statistics and sales ratios to identify market trends in developing market values.
15 13
City of Centerville
A sales ratio is obtained by comparing the assessor's market value to the adjusted sales pric
each property sold in an arms-length transaction within a fixed period. An "arms-length"
transaction is one that is generated after a property has had sufficient time on the open market,
between both an informed buyer and seller with no undue pressure on either party. The median
or mid-point ratios are calculated and stratified by property classification.
100%
The only perfect assessment would have a 100% ratio for every sale. This is of course, is
impossible. Because we are not able to predict major events that may cause significant
shifts in the market, the state allows a 15% margin of error.
The Department of Revenue adjusts the median ratio by the percentage of growth from the
previous year's abstract value of the same class of property within the same jurisdiction.
This adjusted median ratio must fall between 90% and 105%. Any deviation will warrant a
state mandated jurisdiction-wide adjustment of at least 5%. To avoid this increase, the
Anoka County Assessor requests a median sales ratio of 94.5%.
Countywide, we have the ability to stratify the ratios by style, age, quality of construction,
size, land zone and value. This assists us in appraising all of our properties closer to our
goal ratio.
Sales Statistics Defined
In addition to the median ratio, we have the ability to develop other statistics to test
the accuracy of the assessment. Some of these are used at the state and county
level also. The primary statistics used are:
Aggregate Ratio: This is the total market value of all sale properties divided by the
total sale prices. It, along with the mean ratio, gives an idea of our assessment
level. Within the city, we constantly try to achieve an aggregate and mean ratio
of 94% to 95% to give us a margin to account for a fluctuating market and still
maintain ratios within state mandated guidelines.
Mean Ratio: The mean is the average ratio. We use this ratio not only to watch our
assessment level, but also to analyze property values by development, type of
dwelling and value range. These studies enable us to track market trends in
neighborhoods, popular housing types and classes of property.
Coefficient of Dispersion (COD): The COD measures the accuracy of the assessment. It is
possible to have a median ratio of 93% with 300 sales, two ratios at 93%, 149 at 80%
and 149 at 103%. Although this is an excellent median ratio, there is obviously a great
inequality in the assessment. The COD indicates the spread of the ratios from the mean
or median ratio.
16 14
City of Centerville
The goal of a good assessment is a COD of 10 to 20. A COD under 10 is considered
excellent and anything over 20 will mean an assessment review by the Department of
Revenue.
Price Related Differential (PRD): This statistic measures the equality between the
assessment of high and low valued property. A PRD over 100 indicates a regressive
assessment, or the lower valued properties are assessed at a greater degree than the
higher. A PRD of less than 100 indicates a progressive assessment or the opposite. A
perfect PRD of 100 means that both higher and lower valued properties are assessed
exactly equal.
Current Sales Study Statistics
The following statistics are based upon ratios calculated using 2012 pay 2013 market values
and October 2012 - September 2013 sales. These are the ratios that our office uses for
citywide equalization, checking assessment accuracy, and predicting trends in the market.
Statistic 2014
Median Ratio: 94.3
Aggregate Ratio: 94.8
Mean Ratio: 94.2
COD: 7.2
PRD: 101
17 is
City of Centerville
Residential Tax Changes Examined
Although the Assessor's Office is considered by many to be the primary reason for any property
tax changes, there are actually several elements that can contribute to this change, including,
but not limited to:
• Changes in the approved levies of individual taxing jurisdictions.
• Bond referendum approvals.
• Tax rate changes approved by the State Legislature.
• Changes to the homestead credit, educational credits, agricultural aid, special programs(including
"This Old House", limitations on increases in value)approved by the State Legislature.
• Changes in assessed market value.
• Changes in the classification (use)of the property.
A combination of any of these factors can bring about a change in the annual property tax bill.
2014 Centerville Residential Ratio by Zone
Zone/Code Neighborhood Desc. #Sales Median
CE01-1 AGRICULTURAL 0
CE01-2 DOWNTOWN CENTERVILLE 2 94.3
CE01-3 NORTHSIDE AVERGE 12 94.6
CE01-4 2.5 TP 10 ACRE RES 0
CE01-5 LAKESHORE 1 96.6
CE01-6 SOUTHSIDE AVERAGE 5 94.3
CE01-7 ABOVE AVERAGE RES 18 94.0
CE01-8 AVERAGE TOWNHOMES 4 95.2
CE01-9 ABOVE AVERAGE TOWNHOMES 5 94.0
ALL ZONES 47 94.3 7.2
18 16
City of Centerville
2014 Real Estate Tax Information
The 2014 real estate tax bills were sent out around the middle of March. A brief review
of the tax procedure is provided.
Discussion
The real estate tax is an ad valorem tax; that is, a tax levied based on the value of the
property. The calculation of the tax requires two variables, a tax capacity value and the
district tax capacity rate applicable to each individual property.
Tax Capacity
Tax capacity value is a percentage of the taxable market value of a property. State law
sets the percent. Determination of tax capacity values have historically changed over
the years although the payable 2009 are mostly unchanged from 2009. For the taxes
payable in 2011 the rates are as follows:
Tax capacity value for residential homestead property is determined as follows:
Res. Homestead(1A) Taxable Market Value First$500,000 @ 1.00%
Taxable Market Value Over$500,000 @ 1.25%
Tax capacity value for rental residential property is determined as follows:
One unit(41361) Taxable Market Value First$500,000 @ 1.00%
Taxable Market Value Over$500,000 @ 1.25%
Two to three unit s(4131) Taxable Market Value All @ 1.25%
Apts 4+ units(4A) Estimated Market Value All @ 1.25%
Low Inc. Rental Housing Estimated Market Value All @ .75%
Tax capacity value for commercial/industrial property is determined as follows:
Commercial/Industrial (3A) Estimated Market Value First$150,000 @ 1.50%
Over$150,000 @ 2.00%
Note: The above rates do not include the homestead exclusion added for the pay
2012 assessment. This homestead exclusion is a sliding scale reduction to the market
value up to a maximum$500,000 value.
19 17
City of Centerville
Appeals Procedure
Each spring Anoka County sends out a property tax bill. Three factors that affect the tax bill are:
1. The amount your local governments(town, city, county, etc.)spend to provide services to
your community,
2. the taxable market value of your property, and
3. the classification of your property(how it is used).
The assessor determines the final two factors. You may appeal the value or classification of your
property.
Informal Appeal
0 Property owners are encouraged to call the appraiser or assessor whenever they have
questions or concerns about their market value, classification of the property, or the
assessment process.
0 Almost all questions can be answered during this informal appeal process.
0 When taxpayers call questioning their market value, every effort is made to make an
appointment to inspect properties that were not previously inspected.
0 If the data on the property is correct, the appraiser is able to show the property owner
other sales in the market that support the estimated market value.
0 If errors are found during the inspection, or other factors indicate a value reduction is
warranted, the appraiser can easily make the changes at this time.
Local Board of Equalization/Open book format
0 The Open book format is an informal meeting with the City Assessor
0 This years Open book mtg is scheduled for April 30"' 1-7pm & May 1'from 8am -4:30pm
0 Taxpayers can make their appeal in person or by letter.
0 The assessor is present to answer any questions and present evidence supporting their
value.
County Board of Appeal and Equalization
In order to appeal to the County Board of Appeal and Equalization, a property owner must first
appeal to the Local Board of Appeal and Equalization.
The County Board of Appeal and Equalization follows the Local Board of Appeal and
Equalization in the assessment appeals process.
20 Is
City of Centerville
0 Their role is to ensure equalization among individual assessment districts and classes of
property.
0 The board meets during the Final ten working days in June. In 2013 it will commence on
June 16t'at 6:00 pm.
0 A taxpayer must first appeal to the local board before appealing to the county board.
Decisions of the County Board of Appeal and Equalization can be appealed to tax court.
Minnesota Tax Court
The Tax Court has statewide jurisdiction. Except for an appeal to the Supreme Court, the Tax
Court shall be the sole, exclusive and final authority for the hearing and determination of all
questions of law and fact arising under the tax laws of the state. There are two divisions of tax
court: the small claims division and the regular division.
The Small Claims Division of the Tax Court only hears appeals involving one of the following
situations:
• The assessor's estimated market value of the property is<$300,000
• The entire parcel is classified as a residential homestead and the parcel contains no more
than one dwelling unit.
• The entire property is classified as an agricultural homestead.
• Appeals involving the denial of a current year application for homestead classification of the
property.
The proceedings of the small claims division are less formal and property owners often
represent themselves. There is no official record of the proceedings. Decisions made by the
small claims division are final and cannot be appealed further. Small claims decisions do not set
precedent.
The Regular Division of the Tax Court will hear all appeals, including those within the jurisdiction
of the small claims division. Decisions made here can be appealed to a higher court.
The principal office for the Tax Court is located in St. Paul. However, the Tax Court is a circuit
court and can hold hearings at any other place within the state so that taxpayers may appear
with as little inconvenience and expense to the taxpayer as possible. Appeals of property
located in Anoka County are heard at the Anoka County Courthouse,with trials scheduled to
begin on Thursdays. Three judges make up the Tax Court. Each may hear and decide cases
independently. However, a case may be tried before the entire court under certain
circumstances.
The petitioner must file in tax court on or before April 30 of the year in which the tax is payable.
21 19
City of Centerville
Sample Notice
Notice of Valuation and Classification•County of Anoka 071 DOO
•This is not a bill-
Property Records and Taxation This form is to notify you of the market value and classification of your properly
Michael R Sutherland for assessment year 2011 The property taxes you will pay in 2012
Anoka County Assessor will be based on this valuation and classdication
2100 3rd Avenue
Anoka,MN 55303-2281
(763)323-5475
www.co anoka mn us
FIELDS ERIC 8 BRIDGETTE
19035 FILLMORE ST NE
EAST BETHEL MN 55011-9283
If yocrlieva your vatuefion ander
ply< ar8" ,ttta'ttot ;���._�, ��•�, - •.�,� �4�:�;� ..
to,oaLaatytiHrassessoror THE N 165 FT OF E 183 FT OF NE1/4 OF NW 1/4 OF SEC 19 TWP 31 RGE 23(AS MEAS ALG E 8 N
atlaiad.anyn9 LINES THEREOF)EX RD,SUBJ TO EASE OF REC
384109TH AVE NE ,,,,ti
If e am js+w , BLAINE MN 55434-0000 M
Property I.D.: 19.31.23.21-0002
oryoV��rolrsal>nur -- y� p
W,Y T'14,W6 {,�,y+K�R,�il��i��. \ T fll �:.>`+�t-i�iF a`.-v. : 'xd`''- .+ ?S'N.+'<:'+Ka,2`'i'Jhri��{' c ..*'wa•a+[..cw.1�..�srx�: '--
olteri your Assessmen ; " a.
.�:+A`�:.��ate0" .
e oto s t Year 2010 Assessment Year 2011
P�ta�v allbislevel (For Taxes Payable in 2011) (For Taxes Payable in 2012)
Comm/Ind Command
ti�rAi�''F�198�i$:9rik�e1�18aTE.2101.
rasa{ved.iri�r��.8ppesf)cptlaaf'$'.
are.e�B Pleasereadlg - of
tf�siiatiae•#��wrtaatlnkg+lu� :: .
aboutl�iafarappeatlrroAess ,
.. - " ��" . :'SP ::;�:�ata :,,,,wa``;,;`, , d `�is;",
Property information is available for -':' +� a "' ":" z-M_' W, < —i"P
viewing Monday-Friday,8:00 am- Assessment Year 2010 Assessment Year 2011
4 30 p m at the Anoka County (For Taxes Payable in 2011) (For Taxes Payable in 2012)
Government Center Room 165 Public Estimated Market Value $169,700 $163,400
Research Area,2100 3rd Ave.,
Anoka,or online at
www.co anoka.mn.us
Taxable Market Value $169,700 $163,400
April 18,2011 7:00 PM To appear please call your Laval Assessor at 763.323-5496 or 763-323-5491
Blaine City Hell
10801 Town Square or
Blaine MN 55449
,,q+ +R+ .0 .+. 4c+.3wR.?i'JT:RC\ �c'. ww« �•�\` ..tt�..�.o ` +` d.A
MJune 13,2011 6,00 PM An appointment must be made in advance to appear before the board.To
Anoka County Government Center schedule an appointment please cell the County Assessor's Office at
County Boardroom-Room 705 763-323-5475
2100 3rd Ave
Anoka MN 55303
Please read the back of this notice for important appeal information.
2 2 20
City of Centerville
Anoka County
"Ago Larry W,Dahcn Division Manager PROPFRTI TAX
Pwperq-Record,03" and Taxation STATEMENT
21(H)3rd Avcmic
Ak ANOKA Anoka, 3) 55303-3281
COUNTY `7��)323-54WwHW.co.anoka.nin us
071000FPROPERTY-TAX VALUES&CLASSIFICATION
Taapayer(s): Payable Yea1: 2010 2011
Fsnmated Market Value 169.500 1697(g)
FIELDS ERIC 8 BRIDCETTE Nevx Improvements'
19035 FILLMORE S7 NE FxpiredLxclustons
EAST BETHEL MI 55011-9283 Taxable Market Value 109,500 169,700
Itlnlli�lrli�lll"11'I�II�I�II�I�Ihilll�llll111��11i1lulllt��l Property C.lassi icatton• Comm/Ind Commllnd
Property I.D.:19-31-73-211b02 REAL
Property Description:THE n;165 FT OF E 183 FT OF NE 1/4 OF NV'1/4 OF SEC
19 TNlP 31 RGE 23(AS N EAS ALG E g I1 LINES THEREOF)EX RD SUB.-TO EASE OF
REC You stay be eligible for one or even two
384109TH A\'E NE?lAIWE,M14 55434-0000 refunds to reduce your property tax.
TCA:67011A ACRES-055 y
$$$
Oolners(s): FIELDS ERIC 8 B9IDGETTE REFUNDS? Read the back of this statement to
find out how to apply.
Taxes Year: 2010 2011
1 Use this amount on I-urm M1PR 10 Sec d you are eligible for a properly tae refund $0.00
bile by August 15 It this box is checked,you owe delinquent taxes and arc not chgible.13
2 1Tsc these amounts on Form MIPR to see it you are eligibh.for a sp cial refund $0 W
Property Tac and Credits
3 Property taxis Wore credits $4375 25 54.77062
4 Credits that reduce property taxes
A Homestead and agricultural mancct salue credits $0.00 $0.00
R Agncultmal preserve credit 5000 S000
5. Property taxes atter credits $4375.25 $4,776,62
Properli Tax M Jurisdiction
6 County A General county levy $57500 $5990
R Regional rail authority 52093 S20.00
7 Countnmumcipal public safety radio system S629 $0.36
8 City or town 548219 $49230
9 State general tax 51,211 20 $1.296.70
10. School district#11 A Voter approved levies 559617 $523 94
B Other local levies 52^3291 $265.89
11 Special taxing districts V Metropolitan special tetung districts $44 15 $43.28
R Other special taxing districts $3351 53953
C Tax increment $000 SO HO
1) Fiscal disparity 51224.62 $147821
12 Non-school voter approved referenda Imes S8.22 51074
13 Total property tax before special assessments $4.37525 $4776.62
Special Assessments
14 Special assessments A Solid waste management charge $79.97 57997
B All other special assessments $000 $0.00
C Contamination tax $0 00 $0.00
15.TOTAL PROPERTY TAX AND SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS $4,45522 S4.85659
Pay this amount no later than May 15,2011 52.428.29
Pay this amount no later than October 15,2011 S2428.30
23 21
City of Centerville
$$$REFUNDS If you owned and occupied this property on January 2,2011 as)oro homestead you may qualify for one or both of the following
refunds
Ey en if you did not I You may be eligible for a refund if your Mixes exceeded certain income-based thresholds.and your totul household
qualify in previous income is less than$99,2.10
years,you may 2 If you also owned and occupied this property on January 2,2010 as your homestead,you may be eligible for a refund if
qualify for one or your property,taxes increased by more than 12 percent and at least S100 ov ci last vear
even two refunds If you need Form M 1 PR and instructions:
from the
State of Minnesota Q {rte Minnesota Tax Forms
Hww taxes state Inn It 1 1651 296-4444 �;!}' Mail Station I42t
based on your - ,.
2011 Property Taxes. St,Paul,MC 55146-1421
Mehr sure to provide vaur Prnpem ID Auuihr r on iour,WPR m emurc prompt proresruip
Senior Citizens Property Tax Deferral
I he Senior Citizen Deferral Program was established to help semoi citizens having difficulty paying property taxes This deferral program allows senior citizens to
leverage the equity in their home.providing two primary advantages
1 It inniis the annual out-of-pocket payment for property taxes to 3 percent of total household income,and
2 h provides predutabihty T'he amount you pay will not change for as long as you participate in thn program
To be eligible,you must be 1)at least 65 years old,2)with a household income of$60.000 or less,and 3)have hvcd in vain home for at(cast 15 years \Vhde in this
program,you will only have to pay taxes equal to 3 percent of your net income.with die remaining tux paid by;,low interest loan by the Stvte of Minnesota This is
not a tax forgiveness program-the unpaid tax along with accumulated interest will become a hen on the propony for future samlaction,such as upon a sale or
disposition of the estate To receive a fact sheet and application,please call (651)556-4803
Penalty for Late Payment of Property Tax
if you pay your first half and second half propeny tax after the due dates,a penalty will be added to your tax The Idler you pay,the greater the penalty you must pay
-rhe table below shows the penalty you will pay if your property taxes are not paid before the date shown
Agricultural Homesteads: II the due duty
for-,w. half p,apn
ro -Lu payment i,
i�n,emt,e,15 I�a nd yow property x,.la..rlied2UI1 20I2
as agnculursal homss(end propeny the
r-11)rat,,Inc late payrnent,are 61.,if,..
pay from November 16 through Kovern
10,HS.d you pa
y from December I throueh I 'y- e r ;�; i C y o `
J,mma)l;and 10`,if you pay on January 2,
2012 or later
Property Type:
Agricultural hon-homesteads:If the due Homestead and Cabins
date Dot vow.mond half propeny taxI"half 2% 4% 51, K 7r 8', 8 Sr111, 85, 8% 1011r
payment I,'sovsmba 15 and yow proper,i. 2"'half I 2% 6r„ 61 8% 109
elacvified as;.gricultUral nun-homestead Both Unpaid 55, 75, 7% 8'!r 109
p,.peny.the persalt,rates for III le paymcn:s Non-Homestead
through tdovcmb,r 30,12'i If you pay
are hr if sou pay Irom`lovember )from 1'half 4% 81k o5, 10 r I1Cr 121} 124 12 121. 1211, 145,
Dcecmbci 1 thr� hJano.m d lar
I ai ,p 2'a half 41, I 81,, I 91k12% 14%
)uu Is)on Janwtry 2,2012 of later Both Unpaid 850 10`.i 10 a 12% 14%
Personal Property 8r 81, 81r 811, 85i 85, 8% 8';, 85, 8% 8Si
Nate:T he u—for personal property Manufactured Homes
hsatcd on leased govenunenl-owned land I
may be pard m two rnstallmcnts which arc 1°halt 8': Ree 81, 8q 8% 85r 8;c
due at the same hnw as teal propeny taus, Yd halfI 8% 81k 8%
and whr.h are subJes•i 10 the sante penalty Note to manufactured home owners: The title to your manufactured home cannot be transferred unless all current and
schedule aid penal,rats s as real propeny delinquent personal property taxes due at the time of the transfer are paid.
tax., All other r—onal pmpcny taxes are
due in Full on or before htav 16,2011
Anoka County Now Offers Direct Payments and Internet Payments for Property Taxes
• Your property tax payments can now be made automatically from your checking or savings account For more information on direct payments call
(763)323-5400. From the main menu press2"for general information,then press"0"(not available for escrow accounts).
• You can pay your taxes from your bank account or with your Visa or Mastercard on line at w wss.anokacoumN.us
• Call 1763)323-5400 for our Interactive Voice Response(IVR)system to access property tax information.
IMPORTANT INFORMATION ABOUT YOUR PROPERTY TAX STATEMENT
e Only one tax statement per parcel is marled per year Statements are marled in mid to late March,with the exception of manufactured homes,
which are marled In mid to late June A change in the ownership recorded after January I of the current year.will not initiate the marling of a
new tax statement The statement will be sent to the previous ownerlor taxpayer Mortgage refinance and/or saustaction and sale are common
reasons for a change In the current year taxpayer and require a request for a duplicate tax statement.
JI you have pard off or refinanced your mortgage and were escrowing your tax payment.you are responsible for paying the taxes due Failure to
timely pay your taxes due to not revels in-,or having a tax statement will not forgnc the imposition of penalty and interest
, if you have not received your tax statement(s)by April In of on)year(July 15'a for manufactured homes),please call(763)323-5400 and
request a duplicate.
r HOMESTEAD Property currently classified as homestead will not be trailed a homestead verification card and mill continue to be classified as
homestead as long ac the property n occupied by the owner or qualifymg relative as their principal place of residence. Am change in the
occupancy status of bomestead property requires notification to the County Assessor.
i P1IPORTANT TELEPHONE NUMBERS: (631)296.3781 Property tax rehind quesuons-State of Minnesota
(763)323-5737 Solid waste rrungernent charge ILine 1441 questions and information 4noka County
(763)323.5400 All property related questions Anoka County
24 22
Annual Report on the Twin Cities
Housing Market
FOR RESIDENTIAL REAL ESTATE ACTIVITY IN THE
13-COUNTY TWIN CITIES REGION
MINNEAPOLIS AREA Association
of REALTORS®
R®
25
Annual Report on the Twin
Cities Housing Market
FOR RESIDENTIAL REAL ESTATE ACTIVITY IN THE MINNEAPOLIS AREA Association
13-COUNTY TWIN CITIES REGION of R E A LTO R S®
It was a banner year for residential real estate across America. Distressed PropertieS Foreclosures and short sales
Nearly every metropolitan housing market embarked upon or exerted far less downward pressure on prices,partly due to
continued along the road to recovery. Local and regional recovery within those segments but mainly because of their
markets once burdened by excessive supply levels and heavy dwindling market share. Plummeting from 50.0 percent to 26.4
foreclosure loads have given way to multiple-offer situations, percent in two years,the percentage of all sales that were in
homes selling in record-low market times and prices rallying to financial distress is on the decline. In this improving economy,
multi-year highs in many cases. fewer homeowners are defaulting,which means banks are
listing fewer distressed homes,which means fewer are closing.
The year 2013 brought tectonic shifts to housing's landscape. That's a good thing,since these listings tend to sell for
Many local markets transitioned from buyers' markets to between$130,000 and$140,000 compared to$220,000 for
sellers' markets.Closed sales are up. Days on market until sale their traditional counterparts.
is trending downward.The percent of list price received at sale
is trending higher.Sellers even managed to post a notable
gain. PriCeS We closed 2013 with a 14.4 percent median price
increase compared to 2012.At$192,000,the median sales
Low(but upwardly mobile)mortgage rates,still affordable price is proudly standing at a five-year high. Prices are now just
prices and a better jobs scene created a triple play that helped 16.5 percent below their 2006 peak but 28.0 percent above
bolster consumer confidence and galvanize local markets. their 2011 valley.Watch for move-up buyers,fewer
Rising prices have the dual benefit of further cementing foreclosures and new construction to impact prices in 2014.
confidence as well as lifting homeowners out of underwater Prices are likely to grow but at a tempered pace.
positions, which should create more inventory in 2014. Housing is closely tied to economic health. Households with
gainfully employed wage earners are more likely to make bigger
sales Favorable rates, more employment opportunities and a purchases like a house or a car.When gauging the housing
rising stock market mixed with rising prices, rising rents and market, it's important to closely track job growth and
shrinking inventory left buyers with a sense of empowerment unemployment.
and urgency. Unsurprisingly, buyers closed on 8.8 percent
more homes in 2013 than in 2012,finishing at 53,087 for the "A nation of homeowners is unconquerable."So said FDR.The
year.That's the highest number of sales since 2005. Not only American Dream was alive and well in 2013,as U.S.citizens
was there more demand in 2013, but the product mix of those proved that they still want a stake in the action.With countless
additional sales also skewed toward higher-priced traditional benefits to families,cities and regions,homeownership
homes. In 2014, buyers who endured foreclosure could continues to be the fabric of our communities,and we expect
become ready to purchase again.Also watch for signs of life the national and local housing morale to remain sharp in 2014.
among move-up buyers and in the upper-price echelons.
Investor activity should continue to subside.
Listings At 11,646, inventory levels fell throughout most of Table of Cont@IItS
the year,finishing 10.5 percent below 2012's tally.That is likely $ Quick Facts
to change in 2014 as recovery continues. Rising prices should
continue to unlock additional inventory.A better labor market 5 Property Type Review
meant more stable household finances.There was pent-up
demand remaining from the economic downturn,and sellers 6 Distressed Homes Review
were evidently eager to make a move.Sellers regained a lot of 7 New Construction Review
ground in 2013,listing 72,128 properties or 9.4 percent more
than 2012.They must have caught wind of the robust demand, 8 Area Overviews
rising prices and speedy market times.And many of them got 17 Area Historical Prices
top dollar for their home-in some instances, an amount
greater than their list price. 26 Historical Review
Click on desired metric to jump to that page.
Current as of January 10,2014 Sponsored by Royal Credit Union(www RCU org) All data from NorthstarMLS Powered by 1 OK Research and Marketing 2
26
2013 Annual Report on the Twin Cities Housing Market
Quick Facts MINNEAPOLIS AREA Association
Rankings include geographies with 15 sales or more Counties,townships and Minneapolis neighborhoods are not included. °f REALTORS'
New Listings ; Pending Sales
{I
82,977 81,858 f 52,917
68,886 65,910 72,128 46,178 49,370
38,194 42,060
i
I
;
2009 2010 - 2011 2012 2013 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
Top 5 Areas:Change in Naw Listings from 2012 ! Top 5 Areas:Change In Pending Sales from 2012
Saint Francis +63.4% % Birchwood Village +220.0%
Cologne +60.9% I Lauderdale +94.4%
Grant +52.1% { Rush City +79.4%
Falcon Heights +50.0% I Greenfield +76.2%
Saint Bonifacius +48.6% i Hudson +61.4%
Bottom 5 Areas:Change in Naw Listings from 2012 Bottom 5 Areas:Change in Pending Sales from 2012
Hampton -18.2% I Becker -17.3%
Spring Park -24.2% i South Saint Paul -18.4%
Long Lake -28.3% Saint Paul-Thomas-Dale -18.8%
Circle Pines -29.1% ' Minneapolis-Phillips -26.9%
Tonka Bay -32.1% Circle Pines -33.7%
Closed Sales Inventory of Homes for Sale
At the end of the year
53,087 22,651
45,877 48,812 20,622
38,288 41,606 17,441
13,012 11,646
2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
Top 5 Areas:Changs In posed Sales from 2012 Top 5 Areas:Change in Homes for sale from 2012
Birchwood Village +200.0% Maple Plain +100.0%
Rush City +68.6% Bayport +80.0%
Greenfield +65.2% Hammond +77.8%
Corcoran +64.1% Saint Bonifacius +66.7%
Lauderdale +63.2% Zumbrota +52.0%
Bottom 5 Arses:Champ in Closed Sales from 2012 Bottom 5 Areas:Change in Homes for sale from 2012
Columbus -17.1% Birchwood Village -57.1%
Spring Park -17.9% Spring Park -63.6%
Scandia -18.2% Tonka Bay -69.2%
Minneapolis-Phillips -25.7% Loretto -75.0%
Circle Pines -26.0% Excelsior -90.9%
Current as of January 10,2014 Sponsored by Royal Credit Union(www RCU org) All data from NorthstarMLS Powered by 10K Research and Marketing 1 3
27
2013 Annual Report on the Twin Cities Housing Market
Quick Facts MINNEAPOLIS AREA Association
Rankings include geographies with 15 sales or more Counties.townships and Minneapolis neighborhoods are not included of REALTORS,
Median Sales Price Average Sales Price
I
$236,219
$192,000 $199,377 $211,338 $210,727
$193,341
$165,000 $169,900 $150,000 $167,900
I
f
i
I
i
2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
Top 5 Areas Change in Median Sales Price from 2012 ) Top 5 Areas Change in Average Saks Price from 2012
Stacy +67.1% Dellwood +60.9%
Hampton +56.9% Loretto +59.2%
Saint Paul-Dayton's Bluff +56.3% Newport +55.2%
Loretto +53.8% Stacy +53.4%
Afton +48.9% Birchwood Village +48.7%
Bottom 5 Areas Change in Median Saks Price from 2012 Bottom 5 Areas Change in Average Saks Price from 2012
Osseo -7.8% ! Greenfield -10.3%
Wayzata -18.6% I Spring Park -11.2%
Spring Park -22.7% Lakeland -13.8%
Lake St.Croix Beach -22.8% Tonka Bay -19.4%
Tonka Bay -40.1% ! Lake St.Croix Beach -20.9%
i
Cumulative Days on Market Until Sale ! Percent of Original List Price Received
144 133 147 96.1%
117 92.7% 92.3%0 94.0%
83 i90.6%
l
I
N I l 1
2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
Top 5 Areas Change in Qmrrdative Bays on Market from 2012 Top 5 Areas Change in Pct.of Orig.Price Received from 2012
Birchwood Village +76.1% Loretto +19.2%
Dayton +22.2% Dellwood +8.3%
Saint Paul-Summit Hill +18.5% Excelsior +7.9%
Corcoran +13.6% Nowthen +7.1%
Faribautt +12.7% Afton +6.5%
Bottom 5 Areas Change in Cumulative Bays on Market from 2012 I Bottom 5 Areas Change in Pct.of Orig.Price Received from 2012
Mayer -49.0% Newport -2.0%
Osseo -49.4% Maple Lake -2.2%
Lake Elmo -49.5% Minneapolis-Near North -3.5%
Rogers -50.8% Norwood Young America -4.2%
Rockford -61.4% Birchwood Village -5.4%
Current as of January 10 2014 Sponsored by Royal Credit Union(www RCU org)All data from NorthstarMLS Powered by 10K Research and Marketing 1 4
28
2013 Annual Report on the Twin Cities Housing Market
Property Type Review MINNEAPOLIS AREA Association
Rankings include geographies with 15 sales or more Counties,townships and Minneapolis neighborhoods are not Included. of REALTORS,
Top Areas:Townhouse-Condo Attached Market Share in 2013
84 80 Twin Cities Region 22.6%
Minneapolis-Central 99.7%
Saint Paul-Downtown 96.8%
Average Cumulative Days on Average Cumulative Days on I Lilydale 95.8%
Market Single-Family Market Townhouse-Condo i Minneapolis-University 73.5%
Hugo 50.0%
Cumulative Days on Market Until Sale Minneapolis-Calhoun-Isle 47.2%
y Apple Valley 46.2%
This chart uses a rolling 12-month average for each data point j Vadnais Heights 44.4%
-Single-Family Townhouse-Condo Saint Paul-Summit-University 44.3%
Burnsville 44.3%
175 - -
Spring Park 43.5%
165 ! Little Canada 43.0%
155 ... i Hopkins 41.8%
Saint Anthony 38.8%
145 Shoreview 38.5%
135�. Minneapolis-Phillips 38.3%
E i Woodbury 37.9%
125{
11( Eagan 36.6%
115 j Eden Prairie 36.4%
los Inver Grove Heights 36.3%
j Saint Paul-Summit Hill 36.3%
95 Maple Grove 36.0%
es Edina 35.5%
75 - - _- -__- -_--_ _ Shakopee 35.1%
1-2009 1-2010 1-2011 1-2012 1-2013 1 Saint Paul-St.Anthony Park 35.0%
+ 14.7% + 17.4% 96.0% 96.3%
One-Year Change in Price One-Year Change in Price I Pct.of Orig.Price Received Pct.of Orig.Price Received
Single-Family Detached Townhouse-Condo Attached Single-Family Detached Townhouse-Condo Attached
Median Sales Price Percent of Original list Price Received
52009 82010 02011 ■2012 -2013 I 1112009 ■2010 .2011 ■2012 2013
$211K 932% 92.7%911% 94.1% 960% 963%
91.2% 91.3% 93.4%
, 1
89.2%
$179K $185K,Il$184K
$167K
$140K $147K
$135K
$115K $125K
Single-Family Detached Townhouse-Condo Attached Single-Family Detached Townhouse-Condo Attached
Current as of January 10,2014 Sponsored by Royal Credit Union(www RCU org)All data from NorthstarMLS Powered by 1 OK Research and Marketing 5
29
2013 Annual Report on the Twin Cities Housing Market
Distressed Homes Review MINNEAPOLIS AREA Association
Rankings Include geographies with 15 sales or more Counties,townships and Minneapolis neighborhoods are not included. REALTORS*
Top Areas:Distressed Market Share in 2013
l Twin Cities Region 26,4%
26.4% - 27.8% Isanti 57.2%
Circle Pines 52.1%
Percent of Closed Sales in One-Year Change in Sales of I Cambridge 48.8%
2013 That Were Distressed Distressed Properties Saint Paul-Thomas-Dale 48.2%
Mora 47.4%
Somerset 47.1
Percent of Sales That Were Distressed i Minneapolis-Phillips 45.7%
Minneapolis-Near North 45.5%
i Zimmerman 44.6%
Pine City 44.5%
48.9% 47.9% 50.0% Minneapolis-Camden 44.0%
Saint Paul-West Side 43.4%
39.70/ i Saint Paul-Payne-Phalen 43.3%
Saint Francis 43.2%
I Princeton 42.7%
26.4% f Saint Paul-Greater East Side 42.7%
I East Bethel 41.70/
Belle Plaine 41.6%
Saint Paul-North End/South Como 41.5%
Newport 40.5%
Albertville 40.3%
Saint Paul-Dayton's Bluff 40.3%
Brooklyn Center 40.0%
2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Saint Paul-Battle Creek/Highwood 40.0%
Greenfield 39.5%
I
+ 13.0% + 1 .4% - 6.7% + 5.6%
Four-Year Change in Price Four-Year Change in Price Four-Year Change in Price Four-Year Change in Price
All Properties Traditional Properties Short Sales Foreclosures
Median Sales Price ■2010 ■2011 ■2012 .2013
$217,000 $208,600 $220,000
$200,000
$150,000
$131,600 $140,000
$129,200 $125,900 $133,000
$108,000 $118,000
Traditional Short Sales Foreclosures
Current as of January 10,2014 Sponsored by Royal Credit Union(www RCU org)All data from NorthstarMLS Powered by 10K Research and Marketing 6
30
2013 Annual Report on the Twin Cities Housing Market
New Construction Review MINNEAPOLIS AREA Association
Rankings Include geographies with 15 sales or more Counties,townships and Minneapolis neighborhoods are not included of REALTORS,
I Top Areas:New Construction Market Share In 2013
Feb '09 11762 Twin Cities Region 6.9%
Hanover 36.11%
I Medina 35.3%
Peak of Drop in New Construction Bayport 33.3%
New Construction Inventory Inventory from Peak Otsego 31.6%
Rogers 29.8%
Victoria 27.8%
New Construction Homes for Sale ; Delano 20%
Cologne 255..0%
North Oaks 25.0%
Mayer 24.4%
Chisago 22.1%
Minnetrista 21.8%
3.000 .. - ..
Oak Grove 21.1%
Chanhassen 19.5%
Stacy 19.5%
Blaine 18.0%
Prior Lake 17.7%
j Carver 17.1%
2'� i Elko New Market 16.9%
Ramsey 16.9%
i Andover 16.8%
j Montrose 16.5%
j Waconia 16.2%
Lakeville 15.5%
1,000 ----- "------ ----�"__�.----
1-2009 1-2010 1-2011 1-2012 1-2013 Woodbury 15.0%
i
5.2 2.5 100.3% 95.8%
Year-End Months Supply Year-End Months Supply i Pct.of Orig.Price Received Pct.of Orig.Price Received
New Construction Previously Owned New Construction Previously Owned
Months Supply of Inventory j Percent of Original List Price Received
This chart uses a rolling 12-month average for each data point
1
■2009 02010 D2011 ■2012 -2013 ( -New Construction Previously Owned
102%
7.9 8.1
7.4 7.2 100%
se%
5.3 5.2 5.3
4.9
ss%
111
3.j25
94%
92%
90%
ee%
New Construction Previously Owned 1-2009 1-2010 1-2011 1-2012 1-2013
Current as of January 10,2014 Sponsored by Royal Credit Union(www RCU org) All data from NorthstarMLS Powered by 10K Research and Marketing 7
31
2013 Annual Report on the Twin Cities Housing Market
Area Overview - Around the Metro
MINNEAPOLIS AREA Association
°f REALTORS`
Percent Cumulative Pct.of Orig.
Total Change Percent New Townhouse- Percent Days on Price
Closed Sales from 2012 Construction Condo Distressed Market Received
Twin Cities Region 53,087 +88/ 6.9_% 2_2.6/
26.4% 83 96.1%
Afton 34 -8.1% ! 2.9% 0.0% 35.3% 158 93.9%
Albertville 134 +22.9% 6.0% 17.2% 40.3% 67 96.2%
Andover 495 +10.2% i 16.8% 6.9% 24.2% = 70 97.8%
Annandale 105 +10.5% 0.0% 1.9% 24.8% 136 93.4%
Anoka 213 +11.5% 0.5% 13.1% 35.2% 69 96.0%
I
Apple Valley 877 +9.1% 5.5% 46.2% 28.6% 71 97.0%
Arden Hills 111 -2.6% 5.4% 14.4% 15.3% ( 90 95.6%
i
Bayport 36 0.0% 33.3% 2.8% 22.2% f 88 91.7%
Becker 118 -9.9% 6.8% 8.5% 33.1% 102 102 95.1%
Belle Plaine 149 +19.2% 2.7% 6.0% 41.6% 87 96.3%
Bethel 12 +20.0% i0.0% 0.0% 41.7% f 111 86.9%
Big Lake 309 +12.0% 4.5% 7.4% 37.5% t 79 96.1%
Birchwood Village 15 +200.0% 0.0% 0.0% 26.7% 155 86.4%
Blaine 1,121 +9.4% I 18.0% 29.8% 27.3% 67 97.5%
Bloomington 1,164 +6.4% 2.5% 28.4% 24.1% 76 96.7%
Bloomington-Fast 365 +0.3% 4.7% 22.5% 33.4% 83 97.5%
i
Bloomington-West 799 +9.6% 1.5% 31.0% 19.8% 73 96.4%
Brainerd MSA 1,725 -3.7% j 1.8% 5.2% 17.1% i 189 90.9%
Brooklyn Center 447 -15.8% I 0.2% 10.5% 40.0% ; 77 97.2%
Brooklyn Park 1,274 -0.4% 8.3% 21.0% 36.9% 1 74 97.2%
Buffalo 311 +4.0% I 6.8% 9.6% 27.3% 77 95.6%
Burnsville 847 +0.7% 2.4% 44.3% 29.9% { 72 97.0%
Cambridge 203 +11.5% 6.9% 11.3% 48.8% 84 96.2%
Cannon Falls 135 +26.2% I 1.5% 8.9% 16.3% 150 92.8%
Carver 117 +21.9% i 17.1% 20.5% 16.2% 98 96.5%
Centerville 78 +30.0% 6.4% 16.7% 32.1% 98 95.6%
Champlin 367 +2.5% ` 0.5% 21.3% 32.7% 65 96.8%
Chanhassen 518 +15.1% ! 19.5% 32.0% 12.2% (� 82 97.0%
Chaska 448 +4.2% 14.7% 24.8% 23.2% S 89 96.5%
Chisago 95 +48.4% 22.1% 10.5% 27.4% 130 95.5%
Circle Pines 71 -26.0% 0.0% 28.2% 52.1% 66 97.0%
Clear Lake 102 +15.9% 2.9% 2.0% 26.5% 140 92.5%
Clearwater 61 +8.9% 0.0% 6.6% 34.4% 148 92.1%
Coates 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% (( 0 0.0%
Cokato 57 +16.3% 0.0% 1.8% 21.1% 132 94.7%
Cologne 56 +33.3% i 25.0% 5.4% 30.4% y 93 97.0%
Columbia Heights 349 +4.2% 0.0% 14.3% 36.7% 73 95.8%
Columbus 29 -17.1% 0.0% 0.0% 31.0% I 138 93.8%
Coon Rapids 1,010 +4.2% 3.0% 28.8% 36.7% I 65 97.4%
Corcoran 64 +64.1% 1.6% 0.0% 26.6% II 142 94.7%
Cottage Grove 539 -3.4% i 5.2% 17.3% 31.2% 59 97.9%
Crystal ! 424 +15.8% 2.1% 4.2% 32.1% 67 96.4%
Dayton 61 +8.9% 14.8% 0.0% 29.5% 165 96.7%
Current as of January 10,2014 Sponsored by Royal Credit Union(www RCU org) All data from NorthstarMLS Powered by 10K Research and Marketing 1 8
32
2013 Annual Report on the Twin Cities Housing Market
Area Overview - Around the Metro MINNEAPOLIS AREA Association
of REALTORS"
Percent Cumulative Pct,of Orig.
Total Change Percent New Townhouse- Percent Days on Price
Closed Sales from 2012 Construction Condo Distressed Market Received
Deephaven 65 +8.3% 3.1% 1.5% 6.2% 1 97 93.8%
Delano 150 +50.0% 26.7% 6.7% 20.7% i 94 97.0%
I
Dellwood I 17 +54.5°x6 j 0.0% 0.0% 17.6% 196 91.6%
Eagan 951 +0.2% 7.2% 36.6% 23.0% 1 68 96.7%
East Bethel 151 -8.5% 4.0% 0.7% 41.7% 94 95.3%
Eden Prairie 1,067 +15.2% 3.4% 36.4% 17.0% 75 96.4%
Edina 986 +3.4% 5.7% 35.5% 8.1% 85 95.5%
Elk River 447 +13.7% 11.6% 20.6% 33.8% 81 95.9%
I
Elko New Market 118 +19.2% 16.9% 10.2% 30.5% I 91 97.2°x6
Excelsior 29 0.0% i 3.4% 24.1% 13.8% 115 98.1%
Falcon Heights i 61 +38.6% i 0.0% 18.0% 9.8% I 91 95.0%
Faribault364 +11.0% ( 1.1% 9.3°h 31.9% 1 115 93.4%
Farmington 503 +17.0% , 9.7% 23.3% 34.6% 74 97.3%
Forest Lake 367 +29.7% 9.3% 25.6°x6 27.2% 106 95.9%
Fridley 361 +21.1% 1.1% 16.9% 36.6% 76 96.7%
Gem Lake 4 +300.0% 0.0% 0.0% 50.0% 53 87.5%
Golden Valley378 +22.3% I 1.6% 15.9% 12.7% 71 95.6%
Grant 45 +50.0% 0.0% 0.0% 13.3% 139 96.1%
Greenfield 38 +65.2% 0.0% 21.1% 39.5% II 129 92.8°x6
Greenwood I 16 -15.8% 0.0% 6.3% 12.5% { 184 93.5%
Ham Lake 212 +1.0% 13.2% 7.1% 26.9% C 87 96.8°x6
Hamburg 9 +28.6% , 0.0% 0.0°x6 22.2°x6 I 223 88.8%
Hammond i 53 +1.9% 1.9% 5.7% 34.0% 168 94.2%
Hampton 17 -5.6% I 0.0% 0.0% 5.9% 81 94.8%
Hanover ; 72 +50.0% 36.1% 0.0% 36.1% 95 98.2%
Hastings 332 -6.7% 4.8% 28.6% 29.5% 80 95.8°x6
Hilltop , 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 100.0% 52 92.0%
Hopkins 213 +1.9% I 0.9% 41.8% 28.6°x6 88 96.8%
Hudson i 509 +59.1% 9.4% 22.0% 18.7% i 116 96.2%
14.7% 50.0% 28.0% ` 74 97.3%
Hugo 346 +8.5%
Hutchinson j 285 +3.6% 2.1% 10.5% 24.6% 92 93.7%
Independence 44 -2.2% 0.0% 0.0% 18.2°x6 220 91.4%
Inver Grove Heights 463 +15.5% 9.9% 36.3% 24.6% 75 96.3%
Isanti 201 +20.4% 7.0% 11.9% 57.2% 82 96.7%
Jordan 112 +4.7% 5.4% 4.5% 26.8% 100 95.8%
Lake Elmo 89 +7.2% 6.7% 1.1% 22.5% 94 94.4%
Lake Minnetonka Area 961 +3.1% 7.7% 11.9% 20.2% 133 93.7%
Lake St.Croix Beach i 15 +15.4% 0.0% 0.0% 33.3% 101 91.5%
Lakeland ( 33 +26.9% 0.0% 0.0% 30.3% 88 93.2%
Lakeland Shores 5 -28.6% 0.0% 0.0% 20.0°x6 111 90.5%
Lakeville 1,106 +19.7% 15.5% 20.1% 24.2% 76 97.1%
Lauderdale 31 +63.2% 0.0% 22.6% 22.6% 96 95.4%
Lexington + 11 -31.3% 0.0% 0.0% 27.3% 90 89.7%
Lilydale I 24 +14.3% 0.0% 95.8% 20.8% 153 93.4%
Current as of January 10,2014 Sponsored by Royal Credit Union(www RCU org) All data from NorthstarMLS Powered by 10K Research and Marketing 9
33
2013 Annual Report on the Twin Cities Housing Market
Area Overview - Around the Metro
MINNEAPOLIS AREA Association
°r REALTORS,
Percent Cumulative Pct.of Orig.
Total Change Percent New Townhouse- Percent Days on Price
Closed Sales from 2012 Construction Condo Distressed Market Received
Lindstrom 112 +3.7% 1 4.5% 17.0% 37.5% 144 93.3%
Lino Lakes 254 +8.50A7.1% 16.9% 28.3% 83 96.7%
Little Canada 121 +11.0% 2.5% 43.0% 28.1% I 93 94.5%
Long Lake 31 +14.8% 0.0% 9.7% 29.0% j 99 92.3%
Lonsdale 111 +14.4% 2.7% 0.0% 38.7% 81 95.0%
Loretto 15 +50.0% 0.0% 20.0°k 6.7% 52 96.9%
Mahtomedi 132 +30.7% i 6.1% 12.1% 15.9% 101 94.6%
Maple Grove I 1,302 +11.5% I 11.4% 36.0% 21.9% 68 96.9%
Maple Lake 62 +1.6% 1.6% 6.5% 35.5% 117 89.7%
Maple Plain 23 -11.5% 0.0% 0.0% 30.4% 86 92.3%
Maplewood 521 % 1.9% 24.8% 31.9% 76 96.2%
Marine on St.Croix 21 +40.0% I 0.0% 14.3% 19.0% 172 84,6%
Mayer 45 +12.5% 24.4% 0.0% 35.6% 53 98.0%
Medicine Lake 4 +300.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 110 86.8%
Medina 119 +33.7% I 35.3% 14.3% 8.4% 146 94.1%
Mendota 1 0.0% , 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 19 104.4%
Mendota Heights 164 -5.7% j 1.270 33.5% 12.2% 90 96.1%
Miesville 4 +300.0% 1 25.0% 0.0% 25.0% 131 94.2%
Minneapolis-(Citywide) 5,603 +6.7% 2.0% 23.5% 23.9% ; 77 95.9%
Minneapolis-Calhoun-Isle 434 +0.9% 4.1% 47.2% 13.4% ! 113 93.7%
Minneapolis-Camden 645 +14.8% 0.6% 1.7% 44.0% 89
93.1%
Minneapolis-Central 648 +14.7% 1 4,9% 99.7% 16.5% 76 96.5%
Minneapolis-Longfellow349 +9.4% i 1.4% 3.7% 18.3% 51 97.5%
Minneapolis-Near North , 330 +3.4% 1 1.5% 8.2% 45.5% 98 91.5%
Minneapolis-Nokomis 847 +12.3% 1 0.7% 3.8% 22.8% E 65 96.8%
Minneapolis-Northeast 497 +4.0% 1.2% 9.5% 27.6% 68 97.0%
Minneapolis-Phillips j 81 -25.7% 1.2% 38.3% 45.7% 94 93.5%
Minneapolis Powderhorn 605 +9.6% 0.7% 15.0% 29.6% !! 77 96.8%
Minneapolis-Southwest ; 961 +1.5% i 2.6% 5.9% 9.3% f 62 97.2%
Minneapolis-University 215 -0.9% I 3.3% 73.5% 18.1% 117 95.4%
Minnetonka 837 +3.3% 3.5% 30.5% 15.4% 76 95.8%
Minnetonka Beach i 10 -9.1% 0.0% 0.0% 10.0% 1 185 89.9%
Minnetrista 133 +10.8% 21.8% 3.0% 13.5% 9 152 94.9%
Monticello I 254 +28.9% 9.4% 18.1% 33.5% ; 78 96.0%
Montrose i 103 +30.4% 16.5% 13.6% 21.4% j 96 95.5%
Mora I 116 -7.2% 0.0% 2.6% 47.4% 157 90.5%
Mound
197 -0.5% 3.0% 6.1% 31.0% i 107 93.3%
Mounds View i 121 -6.2% 1.7% 9.9% 26.4% 75 95.4%
New Brighton 227 -13.7% 5.7% 32.6% 22.9% 75 96.0%
New Germany ; 12 +9.1% 0.0% 0.0% 33.3% 102 95.5%
New Hope 258 +13.7% 0.8% 15.9% 28.7% 68 94.7%
New Prague 191 +2.7% 5.2% 20.4% 27.7% 110 95.9%
New Richmond 228 +20.0% 6.6% 8.3% 30.7% 142 95.2%
New Trier ' A 2 -33.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 53 88.2%
Current as of January 10,2014 Sponsored by Royal Credit Union(www RCU org) All data from NorthstarMLS Powered by 1 OK Research and Marketing 1 10
34
2013 Annual Report on the Twin Cities Housing Market
Area Overview - Around the Metro
MINNEAPOLIS AREA Association
°r REALTORS'
Percent Cumulative Pct.of Orig.
Total Change Percent New Townhouse- Percent Days on Price
Closed Sales from 2012 Construction Condo Distressed Market Received
Newport 37 +19.4% 0.0% 0.0% 40.5% j 74 93.8%
North Branch 243 +23.4% i 14.0% 7.0% 35.4% '' 92 96.0%
North Oaks 100 +44.9% 25.0% 14.0% 5.0% ! 128 94.5%
i
North Saint Paul 176 +6.7% l 0.6% 8.5% 34.1% 86 94.1%
i
Northfield 286 -2.7% 5.9% 26.6% 28.7% 109 94.6%
Norwood Young America 61 0.0% 11.5°x6 14.8% 29.5% 133 90.6%
Nowthen 55 -9.8% 0.0% 0.0% 34.5% 102 96.0%
I
Oak Grove 109 -2.7% 21.1% 0.0% 28.4% C 81 96.6%
Oak Park Heights 47 -4.1% 0.0% 21.3% 36.2% 133 95.0%
Oakdale 461 +19.1%
1.3% 34.3% 28.2°x6 78 95.8%
Orono i 175 +8.7% i 13.7% 13.1% 27.4% 168 93.3%
Osseo 36 +28.6% ! 0.0% 16.7% 38.9% I, 90 93.0%
i
Otsego 412 +31.2% 31.6% 22.3% 30.6% 75 98.3%
Pine City 119 +3.5% 1.7% 2.5°x6 44.5% i 135 92.8%
Pine Springs 2 -50.0% j 0.0% 0.0% 50.0% i 97 97.6%
Plymouth 1,347 +21.4% 4 14.6% 32.7% 14.5% I 74 96.7%
Princeton 206 +0.5% 1.0% 4.9% 42.7% 86 94.1%
Prior Lake 549 +5.4% 17.7% 27.3% 19.9% 89 96.2%
Ramsey 437 +17.8% 16.9% 23.8% 33.2% ! 73 97.4%
Randolph 11 +37.5% ' 9.1% 0.0% 18.2% i 114 91.8%
Red Wing 284 +29.7% 0.7% 12.0% 27.5% 155 90.1%
Richfield 581 +6.2% 0.3% 12.0% 22.9% 64 97.0%
River Falls 215 +18.1% 9.8% 13.0% 26.0% 129 95.7%
Robbinsdale 273 +1.9% I 1.1% 11.7% 31.1% 80 93.9%
Rockford 52 -11.9% 5.8% 5.8% 23.1% i 59 97.4%
Rogers 215 +32.7% 29.8% 16.7% 15.8% 64 97.6%
Rosemount 408 +8.5% 10.8% 34.3% 29.2% 66 97.4%
Roseville 440 +5.8% 2.0% 23.0% 18.6% f 75 95.2%
Rush City 59 +68.6% 6.8% 1.7% 33.9% ! 108 92.3%
Saint Anthony 121 +26.0% +� 0.8% 38.8% 17.4% 68 95.5%
Saint Bonifacius 45 +36.4.% i 0.0% 28.9% 37.8% ( 100 94.9%
Saint Cloud MSA ! 2,143 +10.4% 3.7% 5.3% 21.6% 147 92.8%
Saint Francis 148 +48.0% ; 4.1% 18.9% 43.2% 78 95.2%
Saint Louis Park 908 +12.7% 1.8% 24.3°x6 17.1% 62 97.4%
Saint Mary's Point 8 +300.0% 0.0% 0.0% 37.5% 223 97.3%
Saint Michael 284 +13.1% 7.7% 22.5% 30.6% 75 96.1%
Saint Paul 3,586 +2.8% 0.8% 12.4% 31.1% 88 95.3%
Saint Paul-Battle Creek/Highwood ; 285 +6.3% 0.0% 7.7% 40.0% 81 96.6%
Saint Paul-Como Park i 183 +5.8% 0.5°x6 2.7% 15.8°x6 69 96.4%
Saint Paul-Dayton's Bluff II 211 +11.4% 0.5% 5.2% 40.3% 89 95.4%
Saint Paul-Downtown 1 125 0.0°x6 0.8% 96.8% 23.2% 140 94.4%
i
Saint Paul-Greater Fast Side 417 -2.6% 1.2% 1.7% 42.7% 80 95.4%
Saint Paul-Hamlin-Midway 135 0.0% 0.0% 0.7% 34.8% 62 96.7%
Saint Paul-Highland Park 339 +1.2% 0.9% 13.3% 14.2% 70 95.8%
Current as of January 10,2014 Sponsored by Royal Credit Union(www RCU org) All data from NorthstarMLS Powered by 10K Research and Marketing 1 11
35
2013 Annual Report on the Twin Cities Housing Market
Area Overview - Around the Metro
MINNEAPOLIS AREA Association
°r REALTORS"
Percent Cumulative Pct.of Orig.
Total Change Percent New Townhouse- Percent Days on Price
Closed Sales from 2012 Construction Condo Distressed Market Received
Saint Paul-Lexington-Hamline 166 +9.9% 0.6% 6.0°x6 18.7% 89 94.7%
Saint Paul-Macalester-Groveland 314 +12.1% 0.6% 8.9% 10.5% ! 69 96.7%
Saint Paul-North End/South Como 277 -9.8% 0.4% 4.0% 41.5% I 97 93.0%
Saint Paul-Payne-Phalen 351 +7.0% j 0.9% 1.4% 43.3% 92 95.1%
Saint Paul-St.Anthony Park 60 +11.1% 8.3% 35.0% 13.3% 100 95.3%
Saint Paul-Summit Hill 91 +11.0% 0.0% 36.3% 9.9% 179 91.9%
Saint Paul-Summit-University 185 +20.9% 0.0% 44.3% 30.8% i 113 94.5%
Saint Paul-Thomas-Dale 110 -11.3% 1.8% 1.8% 48.20A i 73 94.4%
Saint Paul-West Seventh 161 +1.9% 0.0% 21.1% 31.7% } 91 95.1%
Saint Paul-West Side 175 -2.2% 1.7% 3.4% 43.4% 101 95.4%
Saint Paul Park 94 +16.0% 7.4% 11.7% 39.4% i 77 95.6%
Savage 566 +8.2% 11.0% 25.1% 20.7% i 72 96.9%
Scandia 45 -18.2% 8.9% 0.0% 22.2% 1 165 93.5%
I S
Shakopee 720 +19.0% 3.3% 35.1% 33.2% i 69 97.1
Shoreview 403 +3.9% 1.0% 38.5% 18.1% 72 96.3%
Shorewood 127 +6.7% 7.1% 10.2% 12.6% ; 136 93.5%
Somerset 68 -9.3% 2.9% 7.4% 47.1% i 138 94.8%
South Haven 54 +17.4% i 0.0% 24.1% 1 167 92.3%
South Saint Paul 311 -14.6% 2.6% 5.5% 38.6%
! 71 96.4%
Spring Lake Park 95 -15.9% I 1.1% 22.1% 35.8% 63 96.7%
Spring Park 23 -17.9% 0.0% 43.5% 8.7% 162 91.4%
Stacy 77 +60.4% ) 19.5% 10.4% 31.2% 89 98.8%
Stillwater 384 +10.3% 11.2% 24.2% 18.2% j 110 95.4%
Sunfish Lake 7 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% i 175 84.6%
Tonka Bay 32 -13.5% 0.0% 9.4% 12.5% f 163 92.2%
Vadnais Heights 187 +16.9% 0.5% 44.4% 29.4% t 77 94.5%
Vermillion 2 -33.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 1 178 92.2%
Victoria 223 +22.5% 27.8% 25.6% 9.0% j 103 96.6%
Waconia 247 +21.7% I 16.2% 16.6% 17.4% 82 95.7%
Watertown 90 +42.9% ; 2.2% 4.4% 30.0% 100 94.6%
Wayzata 69 -8.0% 4.3% 34.8% 10.1% 115 94.5%
West Saint Paul 262 -2.6% 1.5% 22.5% 29.4% 84 95.1%
White Bear Lake 406 +18.01/o 1 1.7% 22.7% 26.4% 88 94.9%
Willemie 13 +44.4% f 0.0% 0.0% 30.8% 159 92.1%
Woodbury 1,416 +26.3% 15.0% 37.9% 18.9% 68 97.4%
Woodland 9 -40.0% 0.0% 0.0% 11.1% 234 84.8%
Wyoming 112 +40.0% i 13.4% 4.5% 25.9°x6 90 95.4%
Zimmerman 240 +12.1% 3.8% 4.2°h 44.6% 94 96.0%
Zumbrota - 59 _ �0_0% _ ( 1.7% 3.4% 15.3% I 116 93.8%
Current as of January 10,2014 Sponsored by Royal Credit Union(www RCU org) All data from NorthstarMLS Powered by 10K Research and Marketing ( 12
36
2013 Annual Report on the Twin Cities Housing Market
Area Overview - Minneapolis Neighborhoods
MINNEAPOLIS AREA Association
of REALTORS'
Percent Cumulative Pct of Orig.
Total Change Percent New Townhouse- Percent Days on Price
Closed Sales from 2012 Construction Condo Distressed Market Received
- -- - - -- -- -- T--- --- -- - - - -
Maple Plain 5,603 +6.7% r 2.0% 23.5% 23.9% - 77 95.9%
Armatage 124 -0.8% 0.8% 0.0% 9.7% 1 47 97.1%
Audubon Park 86 -7.5% 0.0% 0.0°x6 29.1% ` 52 97.7%
Bancroft 72 +2.9% 0.0% 8.3% 34.7% j 66 97.3%
Beltrami 12 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 41.7% 92 89.5%
Bottineau 9 -64.0% 0.0% 66.7% 22.2% 27 104.0%
Bryant 49 -2.0% 2.0% 0.0% 30.6% j 76 97.5%
Bryn Mawr 54 +8.0% 0.0% 7.4% 9.3% i 78 94.9%
Calhoun(CARAG) 46 -4.2% 0.0% 39.1% 15.2% ` 63 96.5%
Cedar-Isles-Dean 69 -23.3% 23.2% 71.0% 21.7% 134 93.2%
Cedar-Riverside 1 21 +23.5% 0.0% 100.0% 19.0% 178 92.7%
Central 84 +42.4% 0.0% 3.6% 39.3% I 77 96.4°x6
Cleveland 86 +21.1% ; 0.0% 0.0% 43.0% !� 87 90.8%
Columbia Park 32 -3.0% ± 3.1% 0.0% 28.1% ! 70 95.3%
Cooper 47 -2.1% 0.0% 2.1% 6.4% 47 99.9%
Corcoran Neighborhood 56 +16.7% I 0.0% 5.4% 37.5% 76 94.8%
Diamond Lake 127 +38.0% 0.0% 3.1% 12.6°x6 73 95.7%
Downtown East-Mpls 71 -14.5% 11.3% 100.0% 5.6% 92 96.9%
I
Downtown West-Mpls 166 +35.0% 1.8% 100.0% 25.9°x6 72 96.8%
East Calhoun 31 -16.2% 0.0% 29.0% 19.4% 106 97.3%
i
East Harriet 57 +11.8% 0.0% 21.1% 14.0% 124 95.3°x6
East Isles 56 +47.4% i 0.0% 62.5% 3.6% 129 92.5°x6
l
East Phillips 23 -28.1% 4.3% 34.8% 47.8% 97 101.2%
Elliot Park 90 +1.1% 21.1% 100.0% 16.7% 77 96.0%
Ericsson 86 +22.9% 0.0% 0.0% 20.9% 48 96.9%
Field I 57 +18.6% i 1.8% 0.0°x6 22.8°x6 64 97.9%
Folwell 127 +21.0% 0.0% 6.3% 44.9% 105 90.2%
Fulton 155 -1.9% 9.0% 0.6% 4.5% 66 98.2%
Hale 58 -9.4% 1.7°x6 0.0% 8.6% 43 98.2%
Harrison 23 +9.5% 0.0% 0.0% 56.5% 97 87.9%
Hawthorne i 45 +50.0% 6.7% 8.9% 35.6% I 105 90.5%
Hiawatha j 82 +3.6% 4.9% 3.7% 18.3% 62 96.6%
Holland 60 +22.4% 0.0% 8.3% 38.3% 90 98.6%
Howe 119 +11.2% 0.0% 1.7% 23.5% 50 97.8%
Jordan Neighborhood 74 -35.7% 0.0% 0.0°x6 50.0% 114 88.9%
Keewaydin 76 +18.8% 2.6% 7.9% 18.4% 54 97.6%
Kenny j 101 +9.8% 0.0% 0.0% 2.0% 50 98.2%
Kenwood 23 -11.5% 0.0% 4.3% 4.3% 121 95.2%
Kenyon 27 -20.6% 0.0% 0.0°x6 25.9% 75 91.4%
Kingfield 118 -9.2% 0.0% 15.3% 13.6% 57 97.1%
Lind-Bohanon 101 +23.2% 1.0% 3.0% 49.5% 82 96.3%
Linden Hills 142 -7.8% 6.3°x6 15.5% 9.2% 71 96.3%
Logan Park 29 +61.1% 6.9°x6 58.6% 17.2% 50 98.3%
Longfellow 60 +27.7% 1.7% 0.0% 23.3% 42 96.9%
Current as of January 10 2014 Sponsored by Royal Credit Union(www RCU org) All data from NorthstarMLS Powered by 1 OK Research and Marketing 1 13
37
2013 Annual Report on the Twin Cities Housing Market
Area Overview - Minneapolis Neighborhoods
MINNEAPOLIS AREA Association
or REALTORS`
Percent Cumulative Pct.of orig.
Total Change Percent New Townhouse- Percent Days on Price
Closed Sales from 2012 Construction Condo Distressed Market Received
Loring Park 104 +8.3% ' 0.0% 100.0% 7.7% ^j 88 95.7%
Lowry Hill 65 -5.8% 1.5% 47.7°x6 10.8% {C 171 91.4%
Lowry Hill East 46 +17.9% 0.0% 63.0% 15.2% ( 72 94.4%
Lyndale 64 +18.5% 0.0% 25.0% 23.4% 73 95.4%
Lynnhurst 109 0.0% 0.9% 0.0% 5.5% 52 97.1%
Marcy Holmes 41 -4.7% 2.4% 80.5% 26.8% i 102 94.6%
E
Marshall Terrace 12 -33.37o 0.070 0.0% 8.3% ; 68 96.7%
McKinley 60 +30.4% i 0.0% 0.0% 50.0% ! 85 89.7%
Midtown Phillips 28 -34.9% 0.0% 17.9% 46.4% j 93 89.2%
Minnehaha 97 +6.6% 1.0% 14.4% 29.9°x6 I 62 96.9°x6
Morris Park 82 +5.1% 1.2% 0.0% 37.8% 73 95.5%
Near North 37 +27.6% 0.0% 18.9% 45.9% I 85 94.0%
Nlcollet Island-East Bank 65 +22.6% 0.0% 100.0% 18.5% 105 95.7%
North Loop 188 +28.8% 0.5% 100.0% 13.3% 64 97.4%
Northeast Park 13 -7.1% I 0.0% 0.0% 46.2% '! 104 97.8%
Northrup 99 +10.0% i 0.0% 5.1% 19.2% ! 60 97.7%
Page 32 5.9% 0.0% 0.0% 3.1% i 46 97.3%
Phillips West 16 -30.4% 0.0% 56.3°x6 31.3% ; 85 91.3%
(
Powderhorn Park 73 +4.3% 1.4% 13.7% 24.7% i 67 97.3%
Prospect Park 41 -19.6% I 2.4% 61.0% 12.2% 99 95.6%
Regina 47 -2.1% i 0.0% 6.4% 38.3% 85 96.9%
Seward 41 +7.9% 0.0% 17.1% 9.8% i 53 97.0%
Sheridan i 18 -10.0% 5.6% 11.1% 50.0% 82 94.6%
Shingle Creek 71 +16.4% 1.4% 0.0% 50.7% i 77 99.1%
Southeast Como 47 -11.3% ? 10.6% 29.8% 14.9% 132 96.7%
I
St.Anthony East 20 +17.6% 0.0% 30.0% 25.0% 54 95.9%
St.Anthony West 20 +25.0% 0.0% 40.0% 15.0% I 56 98.4%
Standish 141 +6.8% f 0.7% 3.5% 24.1% ( 76 99.0%
Stevens Square 29 +3.6% 3.4°x6 93.1% 41.4% 101 93.7%
Sumner-Glenwood 19 +46.2% 5.3% 84.2% 31.6% 146 95.3%
Tangletown 70 -9.1% 0.0% 4.3% 12.9% 68 98.1%
University District ! 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
Ventura Village 14 +27.3% 0.0% 64.3% 57.1% 104 92.5%
Victory 105 +1.9% 1.0% 0.0% 31.4% 79 93.9%
Waite Park 124 +21.6% 0.8% 0.0% 24.2% 66 97.0%
Webber-Camden 95 +1.1% 1.1% 0.0% 43.2 A 103 92.2%
Wenonah 86 +14.7% 0.0% 0.0°x6 33.7% 87 95.8%
West Calhoun 45 +36.4% 2.2% 64.4% 17.8% 122 90.9%
I
Whittier 66 -4.3% 1.5% 72.7% 27.3% 112 94.2%
Willard Hay 131 +18.0% 0.8% 0.0% 46.6% 84 92.7%
Windom 51 +15.9% 0.0% 2.0% 31.4% 112 92.4%
Windom Park 61 +13.01% 0.9% 0.0% 55.0% 107 92.4%
Current as of January 10,2014 Sponsored by Royal Credit Union(www RCU org) All data from NorthstarMLS Powered by 10K Research and Marketing 1 14
38
2013 Annual Report on the Twin Cities Housing Market
Area Overview - Townships
MINNEAPOLIS AREA Association
of REALTORS`
Percent Cumulative Pct of Orig.
Total Change Percent New Townhouse- Percent Days on Price
Closed Sales from 2012 Construction Condo Distressed Market Received
Baytown Township 21 -19.2% I 33.3% 0.0% 4.8% 101 96.0%
Belle Plaine Township 4 +100.0% f 0.0% 0.0% 25.0% 105 95.0%
Benton Township 2 -100.0% I 0.0% 0.0% 50.0% 109 -100.0%
Blakeley Township 3 I 0.0% 0.0% 33.3% 133 81.2%
Camden Township 1 -100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 249 -100.0°x6
Castle Rock Township 10 +400.0% 0.0% 0.0% 30.0% ( 162 88.6%
Cedar Lake Township 18 +20.0% 16.7% 0.0% 27.8% 160 97.5%
I
Credit River Township 42 +16.7% 11.9% 0.0% 21.4% 119 97.7%
Dahlgren Township 3 -40.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 135 82.4%
Douglas Township 1 -- 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 98 85.0%
Empire Township 16 -50.0% 37.5% 31.3% 25.0% 61 100.3%
Eureka Township 21 +75.0% i 4.8% 0.0% 38.1% 1 129 85.9%
Greenvale Township 5 +400.0% 0.0°x6 0.0% 60.0% 180 88.1%
Grey Cloud Island Township 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
Hancock Township ! 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
Hassan Township 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% i 0 0.0%
Helena Township 4 -50.0% 50.0% 0.0% 50.0% 20 96.0%
Hollywood Township 2 +100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 50.0% 300 97.1%
Jackson Township ; 18 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 16.7% 285 87.7%
Laketown Township 14 +40.0% 0.0% 0.0% 14.3°x6 155 92.2%
Linwood Township 59 -3.3% ; 18.6% 0.0% 27.1% 132 96.6°x6
Louisville Township 4 +33.3% 0.0% 0.0% 25.0% 55 90.0%
Marshan Township 4 +300.0% 0.0% 0.0% 25.0% f 111 92.7%
May Township 16 -38.5% 0.0% 0.0% 6.3% 150 94.7%
New Market Township 7 -56.3% 14.3% 0.0% 14.3% 100 86.2%
Nininger Township 5 +25.0% 0.0% 0.0% 40.0% 90 92.1%
Randolph Township 0 -- 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0 0.0°x(,
Ravenna Township 7 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 42.9% I 132 96.8%
San Francisco Township i 1 -75.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 643 82.3%
Sand Creek Township 4 +100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 50.0% 122 91.9%
Sciota Township 0 -- 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
Spring Lake Township 15 0.0°x6 0.0% 0.0% 33.3% 171 98.1%
St.Lawrence Township 1 -- 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 72 79.1%
Stillwater Township 14 -39.1% 7.1% 0.0% 7.1% 114 91.2%
Vermillion Township 2 -75.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 26 97.6%
Waconia Township 4 +33.3% 0.0% 0.0% 25.0% 18 102.0%
Waterford Township I 1 -- 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 156 66.0%
Watertown Township ; 4 -33.3% 0.0% 0.0% 50.0% 226 82.9°x6
West Lakeland Township 30 -21.1% 0.0°x6 0.0% 23.3°x6 133 94.7°x6
White Bear Township 176 +30.4°x6 6.3% 27.8% 29.0% 91 94.9°x6
Young America Township i 2 -60.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 179 100.8%
Current as of January 10,2014 Sponsored by Royal Credit Union(www RCU org) All data from NorthstarMLS Powered by 10K Research and Marketing 1 15
39
2013 Annual Report on the Twin Cities Housing Market
Area Overview - Counties
MINNEAPOLIS AREA Association
°r REALTORS`
Percent Cumulative Pct.of Orig.
Total Change Percent New Townhouse- Percent Days on Price
Closed Sales from 2012 Construction Condo Distressed Market Received
Anoka County 5,294 +7.5% 9.4% 19.6% 32.5% 74 96.9%
s
i
Carver County 1,848 +14.6% 17.5% 22.5% 18.4% M 92 96.2%
I
• , z
Chisago County 900 +13.1% 12.0% 7.0% 33.6% 1 112 95.1%
• i I
I
Dakota County 6,336 +4.9% i 7.6% 32.1% 27.4% i 74 96.7%
I
Goodhue County 639 +19.4% 0.8% 10.3% 23.5% i 149 91.4%
Hennepin County 19,107 +7.9% 5.0% 24.5% 22.4% ; 78 96.1%
4
� f
E
Isantl County 642 +15.1% 4.5% 7.6% 50.9% 95 95.2%
i
i
Kanabec County 203 -18.5% C 0.5% 1.5% 41.4% $ 161 88.9%
I `
. i
Mille Lacs County 360 -14.9% 0.6% 7.8% 36.9% I 114 91.7%
e
i
Ramsey County 6,699 +4.7% 1.8% 19.2% 28.0% 85 95.3%
I
Rice County 831 +7.2% j 3.0% 14.6% 33.5% 111 93.9%
i I
Scott County 2,461 +11.9% 9.4% 24.0% 26.7% 81 96.6%
� e
'
Sherburne County 1,500 +8.2% 7.9% 10.1% 36.1% 95 95.6°x6
St.Croix County 1,339 +12.5% i 6.6% 12.6% 28.0% + 141 95.0%
1
i
Washington County 4,295 +15.1% 9.7% 27.7% 23.9% 85 96.3%
I
Wright County 2,244 +18.7% 13.2% 13.1% 29.5% 91 95.8%
i
I
Current as of January 10,2014 Sponsored by Royal Credit Union(www RCU org) All data from NorthstarMLS Powered by 1 OK Research and Marketing 1 16
40
2013 Annual Report on the Twin Cities Housing Market
Median Prices - Around the Metro
MINNEAPOLIS AREA Association
�r REALTORS'
Change Change
2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 From 2012 From 2009
Twin Cities Region $165,000 $169,900 $150,000 $167,900 $192,000 +14.4% +16A%
Afton $307,000 $330,000 $430,000 $275,000 $409,500 +48.9% +33.4%
Albertville ! $167,190 $150,200 $142,500 $149,950 $178,900 +19.3% +7.0%
Andover $205,000 $205,000 $182,000 $205,000 $227,500 +11.0% +11.0%
Annandale $154,700 $154,110 $153,889 $170,000 $159,000 -6.5% +2.8%
Anoka $130,000 $136,312 $113,500 $122,900 $146,950 +19.6% +13.0%
Apple Valley $170,500 $177,150 $149,950 $175,000 $195,000 +11.4% +14.4%
Arden Hills $232,250 $241,025 $157,500 $325,000 $300,300 ! 7.6% +29.3%
Bayport $186,000 $157,500 $147,000 $184,500 $200,000 +8.4% +7.5%
Becker $134,500 $131,950 $131,700 $149,375 $155,900 ! +4.4% +15.9%
Belle Plaine I $149,900 $142,250 $137,300 $145,000 $159,000 +9.7% +6.1%
Bethel $140,000 $147,600 $100,000 $115,950 $135,000 ! +16.4% -3.6%
Big Lake $135,900 $140,000 $117,500 $134,900 $154,500 +14.5% +13.7%
Birchwood Village $299,000 $0 $240,500 $227,900 $287,375 +26.1% -3.9%
l
Blaine $169,900 $170,500 $154,900 $175,000 $199,500 +14.0% +17.4%
Bloomington $181,200 $178,322 $157,000 $171,000 $193,050 j +12.9% +6.5%
Bloomington-East $157,250 $157,000 $140,000 $145,300 $169,350 +16.6% +7.7%
Bloomington-West $210,000 $206,950 $181,725 $191,000 $215,000 +12.6% +2.4%
Brainerd MSA $142,250 $151,000 $145,000 $154,000 $160,000 +3.9% +12.5%
Brooklyn Center $90,000 $110,000 $82,300 $95,000 $122,000 +28.4% +35.6%
Brooklyn Park $134,020 $140,000 $127,000 $146,000 $167,000 1 +14.4% +24.6%
Buffalo $145,500 $150,000 $131,500 $141,000 $171,810 +21.9% +18.1%
Burnsville $175,000 $167,000 $147,750 $165,300 $185,000 +11.9% +5.7%
Cambridge $110,125 $105,000 $94,000 $101,300 $127,000 +25.4% +15.3%
Cannon Falls $146,500 $139,450 $121,450 $145,000 $177,500 j +22.4% +21.2%
Carver $237,950 $225,900 $225,000 $245,000 $282,500 +15.3% +18.7%
Centerville ( $222,000 $180,000 $154,600 $180,000 $189,950 +5.5% -14.4%
Champlin i $162,000 $172,078 $148,000 $159,400 $182,700 +14.6% +12.8%
Chanhassen $287,500 $313,500 $297,500 $280,500 $303,500 1 +8.2% +5.6%
Chaska $177,500 $210,750 $170,000 $207,500 $252,000 +21.4% +42.0%
Chisago $175,000 $159,500 $155,700 $168,500 $199,850 +18.6% +14.2%
Circle Pines $148,750 $139,900 $124,150 $139,450 $144,300 +3.5% -3.0%
Clear Lake 1 $113,000 $168,950 $146,800 $152,450 $162,700 +6.7% +44.0%
Clearwater $122,000 $159,900 $127,750 $150,000 $160,000 +6.7% +31.1%
Coates $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 -
Cokato $120,000 $99,000 $107,500 $105,000 $129,900 +23.7% +8.3%
Cologne $205,013 $193,000 $189,900 $182,550 $181,500 -0.6% -11.5%
Columbia Heights 11 $122,500 $120,000 $101,500 $99,950 $132,000 +32.1% +7.8%
Columbus $222,000 $232,000 $177,277 $208,500 $202,800 -2.7% -8.6%
Coon Rapids $136,500 $133,000 $114,900 $125,105 $150,000 +19.9% +9.9%
Corcoran $315,000 $291,500 $246,000 $230,000 $300,000 +30.4% -4.8%
Cottage Grove $180,000 $174,450 $160,000 $174,650 $194,000 +11.1% +7.8%
Crystal $139,950 $139,900 $105,000 $127,550 $149,500 +17.2% +6.8%
Dayton 1 $197,000 $205,000 $142,000 $191,500 $274,000 +43.1% +39.1%
Current as of January 10,2014 Sponsored by Royal Credit Union(www RCU org) AI data from NorthstarMLS Powered by 10K Research and Marketing 1 17
41
2013 Annual Report on the Twin Cities Housing Market
Median Prices - Around the Metro
MINNEAPOLIS AREA Association
of REALTORS'
Change Change
2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 From 2012 From 2oo9
Deephaven $545,000 $509,000 $322,000 $493,250 $518,500 +5.1% -4.9%
Delano $201,500 $195,000 $173,150 $205,500 $230,000
+11.9% +14.1%
Dellwood $462,500 $617,575 $499,000 $360,000 $507,500 +41.0% +9.7%
Eagan ± $182,150 $189,000 $170,950 $193,990 $220,000 +13.4% +20.8%
East Bethel $158,950 $150,400 $162,500 $165,000 $179,900 i +9.0% +13.2%
Eden Prairie $250,000 $264,800 $257,110 $257,000 $280,000 +8.9% +12.0%
Edina i $324,900 $339,000 $339,000 $343,875 $350,000 { +1.8% +7.7%
Elk River ! $158,000 $160,000 $132,000 $157,000 $171,500
+9.2% +8.5%
Elko New Market $230,000 $209,900 $193,000 $215,000 $247,627 +15.2% +7.7%
Excelsior $332,450 $277,000 $350,000 $291,500 $409,750 I +40.6% +23.3%
Falcon Heights $267,500 $239,500 $207,500 $228,706 $244,000 j +6.7% -8.8%
Farlbault $115,500 $118,500 $100,000 $115,000 $128,450 i +11.7% +11.2%
Farmington $175,600 $172,000 $140,500 $163,000 $192,250 +17.9% +9.5%
Forest Lake $142,000 $135,450 $153,750 $185,000 $191,000 ; +3.2% +34.5%
Fridley $138,900 $136,545 $120,000 $127,000 $153,500 j +20.9% +10.5%
Gem Lake $302,500 $225,450 $240,000 $352,261 $169,450 -51.9% -44.0%
Golden Valley $220,000 $235,500 $199,000 $218,500 $246,000
+12.6% +11.8%
Grant $432,500 $395,000 $422,500 $367,500 $415,500 +13.1% -3.9%
Greenfield $153,250 $237,750 $373,000 $350,000 $354,000 +1.1% +131.0%
Greenwood $796,750 $659,900 $755,000 $675,000 $921,500 +36.5% +15.7%
Ham Lake $235,500 $227,500 $211,500 $230,000 $271,600 i +18.1% +15.3%
Hamburg $124,900 $102,450 $75,200 $111,500 $95,500 -14.3% -23.5%
Hammond i $127,500 $116,500 $115,750 $121,450 $144,000 +18.6% +12.9%
Hampton $173,875 $189,950 $172,000 $138,500 $217,250 +56.9% +24.9%
Hanover $229,900 $208,875 $214,950 $211,000 $239,950 +13.7% +4.4%
Hastings $150,000 $148,500 $128,500 $142,000 $169,900 j +19.6% +13.3%
Hilltop j $120,000 $35,000 $0 $24,500 $34,500
+40.8% 71.3%
Hopkins $160,000 $148,000 $125,000 $159,950 $180,500 +12.8% +12.8%
Hudson $195,000 $194,848 $184,500 $195,000 $228,500 +17.2% +17.2%
Hugo $154,900 $158,338 $137,000 $164,199 $195,000 +18.8% +25.9%
Hutchinson $124,950 $127,950 $115,000 $111,500 $125,000 +12.1% +0.0%
Independence $306,500 $433,500 $247,950 $387,250 $405,000 +4.6% +32.1%
Inver Grove Heights $165,751 $165,500 $155,000 $160,000 $194,950 I +21.8% +17.6%
Isanti $120,950 $114,114 $91,500 $117,000 $125,000 i +6.8% +3.3%
Jordan $204,000 $174,150 $178,000 $177,000 $214,500 +21.2% +5.1%
Lake Elmo $405,250 $369,500 $374,800 $367,500 $374,900 +2.0% -7.5%
Lake Minnetonka Area 1 $337,900 $341,250 $329,860 $339,000 $370,000 +9.1% +9.5%
Lake St.Croix Beach $158,000 $154,850 $85,250 $180,000 $139,000 3 -22.8% -12.0%
Lakeland { $169,000 $211,000 $221,000 $195,500 $204,990 ' +4.9% +21.3%
Lakeland Shores { $270,000 $738,100 $178,139 $270,000 $265,000 -1.9% -1.9%
r
Lakeville $224,188 $225,000 $205,000 $226,000 $258,000 +14.2% +15.1%
Lauderdale i $189,950 $173,900 $128,150 $168,000 $175,000 +4.2% -7.9%
Lexington ! $138,250 $130,000 $108,563 $136,950 $149,900 +9.6% +8.4%
Lilydale $180,000 $201,500 $177,500 $190,000 $200,250 1 +5.4% +11.3%
Current as of January 10 2014 Sponsored by Royal Credit Union(www RCU org) All data from NorthstarMLS Powered by 10K Research and Marketing ! 18
42
2013 Annual Report on the Twin Cities Housing Market
Median Prices - Around the Metro
MINNEAPOLIS AREA Association
ar REALTORS`
Change Change
2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 From 2012 From 2009
Lindstrom $180,000 $150,000 $143,900 $140,000 $160,025 +14.3%
Lino Lakes $218,950 $211,250 $174,200 $208,375 $229,900 +10.3% +5.0%
Little Canada $175,250 $106,500 $140,000 $175,000 $184,250 1 +5.3% +5.1%
i
Long Lake $197,450 $198,500 $186,500 $227,500 $231,500
+11.8% +17.2%
Lonsdale $160,750 $150,000 $135,000 $144,900 $171,000 +18.0% +6.4%
Loretto $190,800 $215,572 $217,875 $130,000 $199,900 +53.8% +4.8%
Mahtomedi $199,000 $249,995 $257,500 $249,900 $245,000 i -2.0% +23.1%
Maple Grove $222,000 $258,000 $214,000 $219,453 $232,750 1 +6.1% +4.8%
Maple Lake $100,000 $100,000 $112,840 $134,950 $145,000 +7.4% +45.0%
Maple Plain $161,250 $166,700 $153,500 $187,450 $178,750 -4.6% +10.9%
Maplewood $162,000 $156,000 $139,400 $145,000 $165,000 +13.8% +1.9%
Marine on St.Croix $283,500 $272,500 $242,000 $274,450 $320,000 +16.6% +12.9%
Mayer $169,900 $174,950 $169,900 $164,405 $189,900 i +15.5% +11.8%
Medicine Lake $0 $600,000 $315,000 $650,000 $542,000 , -16.6% --
Medina $580,000 $615,000 $525,000 $460,000 $527,500 +14.7% -9.1%
Mendota $0 $493,500 $80,000 $154,500 $287,000 1 +85.8%
Mendota Heights $289,450 $305,000 $286,500 $272,000 $282,500 , +3.9% -2.4%
Miesville $0 $165,350 $0 $140,000 $231,671 ; +65.5%
Minneapolis-(Citywide) $145,000 $160,000 $140,000 $165,000 $189,075 +14.6% +30.4%
Minneapolis-Calhoun-Isle $272,750 $315,000 $267,021 $300,000 $327,780 +9.3% +20.2%
Minneapolis-Camden $49,000 $66,002 $45,000 $59,500 $77,000 i +29.4% +57.1%
Minneapolis-Central $237,500 $225,000 $214,250 $220,000 $247,500 1 +12.5% +4.2%
Minneapolis-Longfellow $172,000 $170,500 $147,500 $169,000 $185,200 +9.6% +7.7%
Minneapolis-Near North $36,950 $55,000 $43,000 $60,000 $81,000 I +35.0% +119.2%
Minneapolis-Nokomis $189,892 $195,200 $162,700 $176,500 $199,900 +13.3% +5.3%
Minneapolis-Northeast I $150,000 $151,500 $125,000 $140,000 $169,900 +21.4% +13.3%
Minneapolis-Phillips $78,000 $110,000 $72,500 $88,000 $90,225 +2.5% +15.7%
Minneapolis-Powderhorn $123,950 $135,000 $110,000 $116,400 $157,500 I +35.3% +27.1%
Minneapolis-Southwest $260,000 $276,000 $264,450 $277,000 $306,000 j +10.5% +17.7%
Minneapolis-University $215,000 $207,950 $205,250 $209,950 $221,500 +5.5% +3.0%
Minnetonka $245,000 $265,713 $233,000 $255,000 $278,950 +9.4% +13.9%
Minnetonka Beach $2,700,000 $825,000 $1,130,000 $675,000 $892,500 j +32.2% -66.9%
Minnetrista $346,639 $325,086 $349,950 $385,000 $435,000 ! +13.0% +25.5%
Monticello $133,000 $135,000 $124,000 $137,095 $155,990 +13.8% +17.3%
I
Montrose I $133,943 $131,371 $114,950 $130,357 $149,000 +14.3% +11.2%
Mora $87,700 $79,900 $84,400 $86,500 $98,000 +13.3% +11.7%
Mound $181,000 $188,000 $150,000 $169,000 $192,750 +14.1% +6.5%
Mounds View $153,000 $166,700 $134,950 $139,500 $163,000 +16.8% +6.5%
New Brighton i $187,000 $178,000 $157,500 $165,000 $171,000 +3.6% -8.6%
New Germany $109,000 $105,000 $110,000 $100,000 $142,450 +42.5% +30.7%
New Hope $158,250 $148,000 $126,125 $155,000 $173,000 +11.6% +9.3%
New Prague $170,000 $161,250 $143,000 $174,000 $195,000 +12.1% +14.7%
New Richmond $139,950 $135,400 $110,000 $124,900 $137,850 +10.4% -1.5%
New Trier ` $0 $149,900 $0 $75,000 $63,700 -15.1%
Current as of January 10,2014 Sponsored by Royal Credit Union(www RCU org) All data from NorthstarMLS Powered by 10K Research and Marketing 1 19
43
2013 Annual Report on the Twin Cities Housing Market
Median Prices - Around the Metro
MINNEAPOLIS AREA Association
�r REALTORS"
Change Change
2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 From 2012 From 2009
Newport $127,400 $123,500 $72,175 $98,500 $141,000 +43.1% +10.7%
North Branch $144,350 $136,000 $115,000 $123,650 $150,000 +21.3% +3.9%
North Oaks $475,000 $584,000 $480,000 $510,000 $625,000 +22.5% +31.6%
North Saint Paul $160,000 $145,000 $120,000 $139,950 $151,000 i +7.9% -5.6%
Northfield $165,000 $159,900 $144,550 $157,250 $182,500 I +16.1% +10.6%
Norwood Young America $134,500 $155,450 $119,900 $128,912 $146,000 f +13.3% +8.6%
Nowthen $230,000 $216,000 $180,000 $209,500 $234,500 j +11.9% +2.0%
i
Oak Grove $207,000 $200,450 $175,000 $200,825 $229,000 I +14.0% +10.6%
Oak Park Heights $127,000 $136,100 $130,000 $134,799 $176,200 +30.7% +38.7%
Oakdale $159,900 $164,600 $133,000 $134,950 $164,000 1 +21.5% +2.6%
Orono $595,000 $565,000 $532,500 $377,223 $501,000 1 +32.8% -15.8%
Osseo $146,250 $136,000 $115,000 $153,950 $141,950 7.8% -2.9%
Otsego $159,900 $160,610 $159,900 $163,450 $194,150 +18.8% +21.4%
Pine City $122,500 $100,000 $81,500 $105,260 $111,275 +5.7% -9.2%
Pine Springs $485,000 $390,000 $300,000 $271,500 $320,000 i +17.9% -34.0%
Plymouth $253,500 $249,000 $245,000 $275,500 $301,500 i +9.4% +18.9%
Princeton $103,160 $113,900 $111,000 $105,000 $140,000 +33.3% +35.7%
f
Prior Lake $234,500 $223,900 $211,000 $227,500 $270,100 +18.7% +15.2%
i
Ramsey $152,250 $156,830 $137,000 $153,000 $182,900 +19.5% +20.1%
Randolph $169,400 $198,900 $168,937 $139,950 $195,900 i +40.0% +15.6%
Red Wing $139,900 $125,000 $119,850 $127,500 $126,900 s -0.5% -9.3%
Richfield $165,000 $160,000 $140,250 $155,000 $174,900 +12.8% +6.0%
River Falls $165,000 $172,500 $143,600 $151,000 $168,500 +11.6% +2.1%
Robbinsdale $145,000 $131,500 $104,750 $123,500 $140,000 f +13.4% -3.4%
Rockford $192,500 $169,800 $130,000 $154,000 $197,400 +28.2% +2.5%
Rogers $226,825 $212,000 $210,000 $236,000 $265,000
+12.3% +16.8%
Rosemount I $193,500 $201,500 $170,000 $180,000 $215,000 i +19.4% +11.1%
Roseville $198,000 $190,000 $158,500 $187,450 $197,535 +5.4% -0.2%
Rush City $87,000 $95,000 $113,000 $92,000 $122,750 +33.4% +41.1%
Saint Anthony $210,000 $181,000 $178,200 $154,950 $179,950 +16.1% -14.3%
Saint Bonifacius $170,000 $178,850 $145,000 $189,500 $185,500 -2.1% +9.1%
Saint Cloud MSA $135,200 $135,000 $127,000 $135,000 $144,500 +7.0% +6.9%
Saint Francis $133,000 $135,000 $122,100 $130,000 $149,450 +15.0% +12.4%
Saint Louis Park $212,500 $213,250 $185,000 $198,450 $219,000 +10.4% +3.1%
Saint Mary's Point $235,000 $134,500 $1,100,000 $170,500 $258,800 +51.8% +10.1%
Saint Michael $179,950 $165,000 $165,000 $183,363 $199,450 +8.8% +10.8%
Saint Paul $117,500 $121,250 $100,000 $120,000 $144,000 +20.0% +22.6%
Saint Paul-Battle Creek/Highwood $116,000 $121,500 $89,700 $111,950 $135,050 +20.6% +16.4%
Saint Paul-Como Park $199,900 $190,400 $145,000 $170,000 $190,000 +11.8% -5.0%
Saint Paul-Dayton's Bluff ! $60,000 $74,950 $50,000 $59,450 $92,900 +56.3% +54.8%
Saint Paul-Downtown $140,000 $152,500 $128,250 $136,500 $157,975 +15.7% +12.8%
i
Saint Paul-Greater East Side $103,000 $102,000 $85,000 $88,900 $115,750 +30.2% +12.4%
i
Saint Paul-Hamline-Midway $149,450 $142,000 $104,500 $126,350 $149,125 +18.0% -0.2%
Saint Paul-Highland Park I $225,000 $232,250 $235,000 $229,900 $249,500 +8.5% +10.9%
Current as of January 10 2014 Sponsored by Royal Credit Union(www RCU org) All data from NorthstarMLS Powered by 10K Research and Marketing 1 20
44
2013 Annual Report on the Twin Cities Housing Market
Median Prices - Around the Metro
MINNEAPOLIS AREA Association
�r REALTORS'
Change Change
2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 From 2012 From 2009
Saint Paul-Lexington-Hamlin $214,900 $217,000 $210,000 $240,000 $229,900 -4.2% +7.0%
Saint Paul-Macalester-Groveland 1 $240,000 $250,000 $228,750 $235,000 $264,250 ' +12.4% +10.1%
Saint Paul-North End/South Como $75,000 $76,250 $57,313 $74,050 $99,900 I +34.9% +33.2%
Saint Paul-Payne-Phalen $70,000 $82,000 $65,000 $80,500 $101,000 +25.5% +44.3%
Saint Paul-St.Anthony Park $256,000 $216,750 $180,000 $190,000 $259,500 +36.6% +0.6%
Saint Paul-Summit Hill $315,000 $377,500 $325,000 $288,000 $341,450 +18.6% +8.4%
Saint Paul-Summit-University $125,000 $157,325 $130,000 $148,750 $170,000 +14.3% +36.0%
Saint Paul-Thomas-Dale $49,500 $65,450 $45,000 $55,000 $80,950 i +47.2% +63.5%
Saint Paul-West Seventh $148,450 $142,900 $103,626 $121,000 $145,000 +19.80A -2.3%
Saint Paul-West Side $91,000 $113,000 $82,000 $90,000 $122,000 +35.6% +34.1%
Saint Paul Park $129,900 $134,600 $117,000 $127,750 $145,200 +13.7% +11.8%
Savage $210,000 $200,000 $186,500 $208,000 $235,000 f +13.0% +11.9%
Scandia $255,000 $235,000 $240,000 $247,870 $290,000 +17.0% +13.7%
Shakopee $175,000 $180,000 $154,900 $167,000 $193,000 i +15.6% +10.3%
Shoreview $204,950 $205,000 $180,000 $191,000 $222,500 +16.5% +8.6%
Shorewood $356,200 $359,288 $349,950 $414,900 $425,000 i +2.4% +19.3%
Somerset $136,400 $130,950 $127,000 $119,900 $144,500 +20.5% +5.9%
South Haven $160,000 $215,500 $187,500 $153,500 $184,950 +20.5% +15.6%
South Saint Paul i $130,250 $131,500 $114,995 $112,000 $139,900 I +24.9% +7.4%
Spring Lake Park $136,500 $131,000 $92,250 $118,000 $141,000 +19.5% +3.3%
Spring Park $270,000 $266,500 $199,900 $352,500 $272,500 -22.7% +0.9%
Stacy $153,450 $138,500 $139,000 $108,750 $181,750 +67.1% +18.4%
Stillwater $208,500 $230,000 $208,000 $216,000 $234,000 j +8.3% +12.2%
Sunfish Lake $830,000 $300,000 $550,320 $685,000 $819,000 i +19.6% -1.3%
Tonka Bay $525,000 $495,000 $550,000 $797,500 $477,500 -40.1% -9.0%
Vadnais Heights $153,500 $165,000 $165,000 $149,900 $167,250 +11.6% +9.0%
Vermillion $169,900 $145,013 $153,500 $187,500 $157,500 -16.0% -7.3%
Victoria $330,375 $374,695 $351,250 $344,123 $371,500 +8.0% +12.4%
Waconia $199,700 $213,500 $167,500 $204,250 $228,500 I +11.9% +14.4%
Watertown $175,263 $159,500 $118,000 $153,000 $175,000 1 +14.4% -0.2%
Wayzata 1 $500,000 $439,000 $426,000 $427,500 $348,000 1 -18.6% -30.4%
West Saint Paul 1 $126,500 $136,500 $120,000 $125,700 $142,750 +13.6% +12.8%
White Bear Lake $167,000 $175,000 $148,500 $161,950 $178,500 +10.2% +6.9%
Willemie $70,000 $117,699 $77,000 $141,500 $128,900 ( -8.9% +84.1%
Woodbury $239,000 $243,750 $219,700 $240,000 $267,000 +11.3% +11.7%
Woodland i $847,500 $561,000 $1,065,000 $700,000 $370,000 -47.1% -56.3%
Wyoming $165,000 $156,700 $150,000 $163,750 $190,000 +16.0% +15.2%
Zimmerman 1 $135,000 $143,700 $118,000 $130,000 $151,250 +16.3% +12.0%
Zumbrota $154,000 $129,700 $132,950 $149,900 $155,000 +3.4% _ +0.6%
Current as of January 10,2014 Sponsored by Royal Credit Union(www RCU org) All data from NorthstarMLS Powered by 1 OK Research and Marketing 1 21
45
2013 Annual Report on the Twin Cities Housing Market
Median Prices - Minneapolis Neighborhoods
MINNEAPOLIS AREA Association
or REALTORS`
Change Change
2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 From 2012 From 2009
Minneapolis $145,000 $160,000 $140,000 $165,000 $189,075 +14.6% +30A%
Arrnatage $231,500 $225,000 $203,750 $218,000 $250,000 i +14.7% +8.0%
Audubon Park $169,400 $169,500 $137,275 $144,259 $166,450 ; +15.4% -1.7%
Bancroft $151,500 $153,750 $128,500 $143,500 $165,000 +15.0% +8.9%
Beltrami $115,000 $116,000 $100,450 $72,500 $131,000 +80.7% +13.9%
Bottmeau $89,000 $156,500 $80,001 $132,000 $217,500 +64.8% +144.4%
Bryant $115,000 $121,450 $110,000 $120,369 $135,500 j +12.6% +17.8%
Bryn Mawr $254,000 $306,000 $317,000 $278,000 $306,000 +10.1% +20.5%
Calhoun(CARAG) $265,500 $203,500 $195,000 $198,143 $267,450 +35.0% +0.7%
Cedar-Isles-Dean $385,000 $315,000 $320,000 $302,750 $306,000 +1.1% -20.5%
Cedar-Riverside $109,500 $111,950 $116,950 $119,050 $123,000 +3.3% +12.3%
Central $71,600 $118,950 $78,450 $89,000 $140,000 ; +57.3% +95.5%
Cleveland $78,000 $87,000 $50,000 $74,000 $84,400 +14.1% +8.2%
Columbia Park $105,000 $138,200 $120,718 $127,000 $147,250 +15.9% +40.2%
Cooper $192,000 $194,000 $165,000 $202,500 $232,450 +14.8% +21.1%
Corcoran Neighborhood $136,000 $145,500 $99,900 $105,000 $140,000 +33.3% +2.9%
Diamond Lake $223,700 $226,950 $195,000 $210,000 $245,000 +16.7% +9.5%
Downtown East-Mpls $374,243 $369,861 $415,500 $412,500 $462,500 , +12.1% +23.6%
Downtown West-Mpls $180,000 $183,000 $165,000 $184,900 $210,000 +13.6% +16.7%
East Calhoun $234,750 $416,500 $397,500 $407,500 $509,500 +25.0% +117.0%
East Harriet $289,950 $298,500 $290,000 $268,000 $297,750 +11.1% +2.7%
East Isles $278,000 $244,500 $275,000 $299,000 $305,000 +2.0% +9.7%
East Phillips $59,000 $108,000 $55,000 $82,650 $81,250 1.7% +37.7%
Elliot Park $255,000 $239,850 $220,000 $182,500 $229,500 +25.8% -10.0%
Ericsson $198,948 $197,750 $160,750 $175,000 $208,000 +18.9% +4.5%
Field $198,750 $192,500 $160,000 $185,750 $195,000 +5.0% -1.9%
Folwell $35,000 $45,000 $30,325 $44,034 $60,000 +36.3% +71.4%
Fulton ` $315,000 $303,905 $336,000 $349,000 $403,500 1 +15.6% +28.1%
Hale $277,550 $255,000 $249,000 $266,000 $281,500 I +5.8% +1.4%
Harrison $42,000 $84,900 $76,450 $65,000 $89,000 } +36.9% +111.9%
Hawthorne E $37,300 $54,900 $46,500 $57,500 $90,000 i +56.5% +141.3%
Hiawatha $182,000 $161,500 $150,400 $165,000 $184,000 i +11.5% +1.1%
Holland $84,000 $118,500 $63,575 $100,000 $127,290
Howe $175,000 $164,000 $125,900 $165,000 $179,900 +9.0% +2.8%
Jordan Neighborhood 1 $29,000 $40,000 $29,000 $50,000 $45,625 ! -8.8% +57.3%
Keewaydin $207,000 $215,250 $161,775 $189,250 $207,500 +9.6% +0.2%
Kenny $242,500 $251,000 $242,500 $246,950 $256,850 + +4.0% +5.9%
Kenwood $885,000 $817,500 $682,500 $760,000 $786,180 ! +3.4% -11.2%
Kenyon $107,000 $90,000 $68,300 $62,750 $86,000 I +37.1% -19.6%
Kingfield ! $189,900 $224,900 $176,500 $227,000 $248,950 +9.7% +31.1%
Lind-Bohanon $51,838 $79,000 $50,000 $54,250 $82,500 +52.1% +59.1%
Linden Hills $330,000 $373,000 $347,500 $373,750 $415,000 +11.0% +25.8%
Logan Park 1 $152,500 $180,500 $129,250 $153,850 $200,000 +30.0% +31.1%
Longfellow $152,000 $158,200 $121,000 $155,000 $174,900 +12.8% +15.1%
Current as of January 10,2014 Sponsored by Royal Credit Union(www RCU org) All data from NorthstarMLS Powered by 10K Research and Marketing 1 22
46
2013 Annual Report on the Twin Cities Housing Market
Median Prices - Minneapolis Neighborhoods
MINNEAPOLIS AREA Association
of REALTORS`
Change Change
2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 From 2012 From 2009
Loring Park $179,900 $200,000 $169,000 $157,450 $210,000 +33.4% +16.7%
Lowry Hill $273,222 $455,000 $239,900 $494,500 $562,300 +13.7% +105.8%
Lowry Hill East $103,500 $200,000 $233,050 $236,500 $255,000 +7.8% +146.4%
Lyndale $125,125 $149,000 $125,000 $121,000 $179,000 +47.9% +43.1%
Lynnhurst $399,900 $448,716 $418,000 $414,500 $435,000 +4.9% +8.8%
Marcy Holmes $243,000 $438,750 $312,000 $299,900 $238,400 -20.5% -1.9%
Marshall Terrace $125,000 $124,000 $68,650 $128,000 $157,500 +23.0% +26.0%
McKinley $27,000 $39,000 $35,000 $44,450 $61,250 +37.8% +126.9%
Midtown Phillips $85,550 $118,000 $84,850 $94,900 $102,400 +7.9% +19.7%
Minnehaha $169,000 $169,000 $144,000 $149,000 $174,900 +17.4% +3.5%
Morris Park $112,000 $152,250 $109,950 $125,000 $150,000 +20.0% +33.9%
Near North $55,000 $70,550 $37,756 $63,750 $85,000 +33.3% +54.5%
Nicollet Island-East Bank $269,950 $250,000 $300,000 $322,500 $393,000 +21.9% +45.6%
North Loop $249,900 $249,000 $224,400 $261,500 $274,990 +5.2% +10.0%
Northeast Park $144,400 $150,450 $52,000 $88,875 $135,000 +51.9% -6.5%
Northrup $195,000 $206,450 $182,000 $195,000 $207,530 +6.4% +6.4%
Page $285,000 $293,750 $254,500 $306,000 $321,525 +5.1% +12.8%
Phillips West $88,000 $106,700 $50,000 $69,250 $98,625 i +42.4% +12.1%
Powderhorn Park $104,900 $113,750 $73,250 $99,900 $137,000 +37.1% +30.6%
Prospect Park $213,500 $220,000 $229,750 $230,000 $261,250 +13.6% +22.4%
Regina $118,500 $164,900 $107,000 $133,241 $155,000 +16.3% +30.8%
Seward $170,950 $197,200 $161,000 $171,300 $185,000 +8.0% +8.2%
Sheridan $86,750 $136,000 $89,000 $111,500 $134,000 j +20.2% +54.5%
Shingle Creek $72,500 $98,884 $55,000 $60,225 $90,000 +49.4% +24.1%
Southeast Como $189,000 $168,000 $157,000 $149,900 $170,000 +13.4% -10.1%
St.Anthony East $143,750 $179,900 $120,550 $154,771 $168,000 +8.5% +16.9%
St.Anthony West $249,575 $221,000 $207,250 $171,750 $237,500 I +38.3% -4.8%
Standish $165,000 $155,500 $128,500 $142,000 $169,950 I +19.7% +3.0%
Stevens Square $103,900 $60,000 $62,950 $104,000 $120,000 +15.4% +15.5%
Sumner-Glenwood $182,500 $155,000 $170,550 $201,500 $220,500 1 +9.4% +20.8%
Tangletown $257,150 $315,000 $330,000 $320,000 $320,500 I +0.2% +24.6%
University District $210,000 $225,000 $0 $0 $0 -- -100.0%
Ventura Village f $100,500 $79,450 $57,900 $66,100 $82,775 +25.2% -17.6%
Victory ! $85,000 $115,000 $85,200 $96,250 $129,000 +34.0% +51.8%
Waite Park I $174,200 $168,000 $137,588 $159,150 $189,000 +18.8% +8.5%
Webber-Camden $40,000 $61,000 $42,000 $47,500 $62,000 +30.5% +55.0%
Wenonah j $176,000 $171,200 $143,000 $152,500 $176,000 +15.4% 0.0%
West Calhoun $365,000 $567,500 $101,000 $163,250 $173,250 t +6.1% -52.5°x6
Whittier ! $114,780 $100,000 $107,000 $84,500 $151,500 I +79.3% +32.0%
Willard Hay $40,000 $66,450 $51,750 $67,000 $97,000 +44.8% +142.5%
Windom $196,750 $226,225 $163,832 $185,915 $218,900 +17.7% +11.3%
Windom Park $172,000 $146,000 $164,163 $163,500 $188,000 +15.0% +9.3%
Current as of January 10,2014 Sponsored by Royal Credit Union(www RCU org) All data from NorthstarMLS Powered by 10K Research and Marketing 1 23
47
2013 Annual Report on the Twin Cities Housing Market
Median Prices - Townships
MINNEAPOLIS AREA Association
or REALTORS`
Change Change
2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 From 2012 From 2009
Baytown Township $425,000 $547,900 $455,000 $509,167 $525,000 +3.1% +23.5%
Belle Plaine Township $142,750 $65,000 $212,500 $216,000 $330,000 +52.8% +131.2%
Benton Township ; $0 $0 $165,000 $0 $122,950 -
Blakeley Township $205,000 $0 $0 $0 $180,000 ` - -12.2%
Camden Township $0 $219,000 $177,500 $0 $200,000
Castle Rock Township $162,500 $141,500 $160,000 $256,250 $253,000 -1.3% +55.7%
Cedar Lake Township $365,000 $273,950 $330,000 $203,000 $372,250 11 +83.4% +2.0%
Credit River Township $402,250 $400,000 $392,000 $438,000 $449,000 ( +2.5% +11.6%
Dahlgren Township $383,000 $135,000 $470,000 $250,000 $290,000 ; +16.0% -24.3%
Douglas Township $0 $181,000 $0 $0 $170,000 - --
Empire Township $138,200 $189,250 $154,000 $208,000 $253,000 I +21.6% +83.1%
Eureka Township $116,750 $127,000 $172,100 $132,500 ' 0
$125,000 I -5.7/o +7.1%
Greenvale Township $351,707 $0 $0 $150,000 $201,000 i +34.0% -42.9%
Grey Cloud Island Township $154,500 $500,000 $270,000 $203,000 $0 -100.0% -100.0%
Hancock Township $176,500 $216,400 $0 $0 $0 -100.0%
Hassan Township $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
I
Helena Township $405,000 $215,000 $260,000 $303,000 $346,066 +14.2% -14.6%
Hollywood Township $230,500 $229,250 $319,950 $210,000 $169,950 -19.1% -26.3%
Jackson Township $173,000 $108,500 $143,000 $214,750 $117,450 ( -45.3% -32.1%
Laketown Township $160,000 $154,250 $189,900 $129,750 $137,000 +5.6% -14.4%
Linwood Township $187,900 $160,000 $139,750 $156,600 $219,900 +40.4% +17.0%
Louisville Township $0 $406,078 $395,000 $115,000 $270,000 +134.8% --
Marshan Township $309,500 $302,500 $284,200 $205,000 $277,500 +35.4% -10.3%
i
May Township $332,000 $345,000 $285,000 $310,000 $360,000 +16.1% +8.4%
New Market Township $349,900 $271,200 $266,000 $331,500 $359,700 +8.5% +2.8%
Nininger Township $0 $272,450 $0 $400,000 $324,000 ' -19.0% --
Randolph Township j $335,000 $350,000 $0 $0 $0 -- -100.0%
Ravenna Township $187,000 $213,000 $200,000 $219,165 $238,000 +8.6% +27.3%
San Francisco Township $132,500 $307,000 $199,250 $242,500 $185,000 -23.7% +39.6%
Sand Creek Township $0 $271,900 $152,500 $269,000 $284,500 +5.8% --
Sciota Township $176,000 $348,800 $323,850 $245,000 $0 -100.0% -100.0%
Spring Lake Township $252,500 $324,900 $263,500 $301,000 $383,900 ( +27.5% +52.0%
St.Lawrence Township $0 $0 $0 $0 $146,300 --
Stillwater Township $357,450 $342,500 $350,000 $356,500 $479,425 I +34.5% +34.1%
Vermillion Township } $285,000 $162,500 $0 $298,000 $258,450 -13.3% -9.3%
Waconia Township $187,000 $300,000 $96,000 $366,000 $291,250 -20.4% +55.7%
Waterford Township $0 $0 $0 $0 $72,500
Watertown Township $245,000 $138,500 $472,500 $297,500 $392,500 +31.9% +60.2%
West Lakeland Township $384,500 $381,750 $308,000 $399,950 $438,000 +9.5% +13.9%
White Bear Township { $214,000 $196,000 $181,000 $179,500 $215,000 +19.8% +0.5%
Young America Township $239,775 $565,000 $262,400 $215,000 $537,500 +150.0% +124.2%
Current as of January 10,2014 Sponsored by Royal Credit Union(www RCU org) All data from NorthstarMLS Powered by 10K Research and Marketing 1 24
48
2013 Annual Report on the Twin Cities Housing Market
Median Prices - Counties
MINNEAPOLIS AREA Association
or REALTORS'
Change Change
2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 From 2012 From 2009
Anoka County $155,000 $155,000 $136,900 $152,000 $174,900 +15.1% +12.8%
k
Carver County $218,000 $230,000 $215,784 $230,000 $251,820 +9.5% +15.5%
i
Chisago County $155,000 $145,250 $136,000 $139,000 $165,000 +18.7% +6.5%
I
Dakota County $174,250 $175,000 $156,000 $170,359 $200,000 +17.4% +14.8%
Goodhue County $144,950 $134,500 $127,000 $134,900 $149,000 +10.5% +2.8%
Hennepin County $174,025 $184,000 $162,500 $182,500 $209,900 +15.0% +20.6%
Isanti County $119,000 $109,900 $94,950 $117,900 $128,100 j +8.7% +7.6%
Kanabec County $84,950 $85,000 $76,250 $79,500 $100,000 1 +25.8% +17.7%
I
Mille Lacs County $92,000 $89,000 $85,000 $92,010 $110,000 +19.6% +19.6%
Ramsey County $144,000 $145,000 $125,500 $142,000 $163,000 i +14.8% +13.2%
I f
Rice County $145,000 $140,000 $125,000 $134,000 $155,250 I +15.9% +7.1%
Scott County $200,000 $190,000 $180,000 $197,001 $226,550 +15.0% +13.3%
Sherburne County ' $144,000 $149,900 $129,900 $143,400 $162,300 i +13.2% +12.7%
I
St.Croix County $161,450 $160,000 $144,650 $149,000 $177,250 + +19.0% +9.8%
Washington County $189,000 $195,000 $179,000 $200,000 $220,000 +10.0% +16.4%
Wright County I $153,450 $152,390 $139,000 $151,900 $176,000 +15.9% +14.7%
1
Current as of January 10,2014 Sponsored by Royal Credit Union(www RCU org) All data from NorthstarMLS Powered by 10K Research and Marketing 1 25
49
2013 Annual Report on the Twin Cities Housing Market ,
Historical Review MINNEAPOLIS AREA Association
of REALTORS`'
Year Number of Listings Total Dollar Volume Number of Average
Processed (in billions) Units Sold Sales Price
1980 37,018 $1.34 18,351 $74,069
1981 35,580 $1.25 15,675 $80,238
1982 41,465 $1.00 12,193 $82,288 i
1983 50,794 $1.35 15,914 $84,953
1984 53,646 $1.55 18,231 $85,007
1985 51,492 $1.87 21,335 $87,789 i
1986 58,382 $2.52 28,015 $90,319 i
1987 55,422 $2.46 25,772 $95,914
1988 80,771 $3.21 34,244 $93,977
1989 89,170 $3.28 33,962 $96,658
1980 78,548 $3.37 34,496 $98,016
1991 71,850 $3.52 35,598 $99,402
1992 72,730 $4.31 41,944 $103,264
1993 70,685 $4.30 39,842 $107,569
1994 63,369 $4.73 42,454 $111,806 ° 1980-1996
1995 64,556 $4.94 42,310 $117,053 All property types and
all MLS districts.
1996 73,433 $5.82 46,949 $124,022
1997 63,189 $5.68 41,441 $137,085
1998 64,280 $7.09 47,836 $147,346 1997-PreSPalt
1999 57,573 $7.62 46,675 $163,277 Single-family detached
homes,condominiums,
2000 59,618 $8.76 48,208 $181,605 townhomes and twin homes
2001 71,861 $10.22 50,298 $203,136 for the 13-county metro area.
2002 73,940 $11.33 51,212 $221,275
2003 88,132 $13.79 57,458 $240,005 '
20 "reswt
Home sales were recalculated
2004 100,042 $15.61 60,180 $259,278 in 2012 to account for all late
; 2005 99,635 $16.60 60,065 $273,698 recorded activity,affecting
data back to 2003.
2006 108,050 $13.92 49,424 $279,143
2007 105,006 $11.41 41,034 $275,768
2008 93,465 $9.44 39,598 $236,56-
2009 82,977 $9.19 45,877 $199,377
I 2010 81,858 $8.16 38,288 $211,338
2011 68,886 $8.10 41,606 $193,341
I 2012 65,910 $10.36 48,812 $210,727 l
l2013 72,128 $12.61 53,087 $236,219
More Data! Visit mpisrealtor.com to access up-to-date market reports
throughout the year.See residential real estate trends in sharp detail
by week, month, locality and even through a mobile-ready interactive
interface that allows for the creation of shareable charts.
Current as of January 10,2014 Sponsored by Royal Credit Union(www RCU org) All data from NorthstarMLS Powered by 10K Research and Marketing 26
50
CITY OF CENTERVILLE
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
Aprfl 23,2014
6:30 p.m.
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, the City of Centerville held their regularly scheduled
meeting of April 23, 2014 at City Hall, 1880 Main Street.
PRESENT: Acting Mayor Jeff Paar
Council Member Ben Fehrenbacher
Council Member D. Love
ABSENT: Mayor Tom Wilharber 1 t f
Council Member King l
STAFF: City Administrator Dallas Larson
City Engineer Mark Statz (Arrived at 6:35 p.m.)
Legal Counsel Kurt Glaser
Public Works Director Paul Palzer
I. CALL TO ORDER
Acting Mayor Paar called the meeting to order at 6:30 p.m.
Acting Mayor Paar requested that item V. Approval of Agenda,be the next item of discussion.
V. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
Acting Mayor Paar added Centerville Claims (Check #28641-28648) and requested that the
Centerville Lions' Request for a Raffle Permit be placed on the Consent Agenda as Item #8, that
Street Dance be Item #3 under New Business and suggested Tabling the Closed Executive
Session due to several missing Council Members.
Motion by Councfl Member Love, seconded by Council Member Fehrenbacher to Approve
the Agenda as presented. All in favor. Motion passed.
Acting Mayor Paar stated that an instrumental Lion member, City resident, volunteer and past
honorary Grand Marshall of the Fete des Lacs parade had passed away, Mr. Lynn Johnson, and
Council desired to forward their condolences to the Johnson family and thanked them for his
services.
II. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
III. AWARDS/PRESENTATIONS/APPEARANCES
51
City of Centerville
Council Meeting Minutes
April 23,2014
1. Sergeant Pat Aldrich, Centennial Lakes Police Department (2013 Annual Report and
2014 Management Plan &Quarterly Update)
Sergeant Aldrich reviewed the 2013 Annual Report with Council highlighting Problem Oriented
Policing (POP), crime statistics, investigations, community events, drug take back program,
police reserves, Community Emergency Response Team, and Chaplain Services provided
throughout the year. Sergeant Aldrich also reviewed the 2014 Management Plan with council
highlighting strategic framework/principle focus areas (fight crime and enhance community
safety, improve organizational effectiveness and professionalism, promote community support
and involvement and enhance innovation and technology); and organizational goals and
objectives.
Acting Mayor Paar thanked Sergeant Aldrich for his report and stated that Council feels that the
Centennial Lakes Police Department is doing a great job of policing the community.
V. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
Previously discussed.
IV. PUBLIC HEARING
1. None.
VI. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
1. April 9, 2014 City Council Meeting Minutes
The Acting Mayor provided Council Members with an opportunity to review the presented
minutes.
Motion by Council Member Fehrenbacher, seconded by Council Member Love to approve
the minutes of the April 9, 2014 City Council Meeting as presented. All in favor. Motion
passed.
2. April 9, 2014 City Council Joint Work Session Meeting Minutes
Administrator Larson stated that the minutes to the Joint Work Session were incomplete and
requested that they be deferred to the next meeting. Council concurred.
VII. CONSENT AGENDA
1. City of Centerville April 10, 2014 through April 23, 2014 Claims (Check #28631-28640)
wNoided Check#28592 &28605 & (Check#28641-28648)
2. Centennial Police Department Claims through April 10, 2014 (Check#9856-9871)
3. Centennial Fire District Claims through April 4, 2014 (Check #6326-6334) & Payroll
(Check#6318-6325)
Page 2 of 6
52
City of Centerville
Council Meeting Minutes
April 23,2014
4. Res. #14-OXX — Reserving Unspent Budget & Revenue Excesses from Year 2013 &
Committing Them for Park Purposes to be Expended in 2014
5. P & R Recommendation to Approve Special Event Permit Application — Centennial
Baseball Booster 5K/8K Run, Anoka County Trails w/Laurie LaMotte Park — September
27, 2014 (6:30 a.m. — 11:00 a.m.) w/Park Use Fee Waiving but not $100 Deposit (They
have submitted permit to Anoka County for Rice Creek Chain of Lakes Permit, will
Provide Police at Intersections,Trash Removal, Port-a-Potties, First-Aid & Etc.)
6. P & R Recommendation to Approve Special Event Permit Application — Hmong Flag
Football Tournament, Laurie LaMotte Park—May 31 —June 1, 2014 (5:00 p.m. May 30—
7:00 p.m. June 1, 2014)w/$50 Usage Fee and Deposit Determined by Staff
7. Encroachment Agreement — Mr. & Mrs. Zachary Handahl, 1937 Eagle Trail — Fence &
After the Fact Pool (Installed by Previous Owner) in Drainage/Utility Easement
8. Centerville Lions Request for Raffle Permit—Kelly's Korner Benefit for Austin Klecker,
May 31, 2014
Acting Mayor Paar provided Council Members with an opportunity to remove any item that they
desired additional information on.
Motion by Council Member Fehrenbacher, seconded by Council Member Paar to approve
the Consent Agenda as presented. All in favor. Motion passed.
VIII. OLD BUSINESS
1. Anoka County Fire Protection Council Joint Powers Agreement
City Attorney Glaser stated that there have been several drafts and many questions regarding the
need of the agreement, additional duties of elected officials and Staff, duplication of agreements
versus combining existing agreements, protection of funding for services offered, costs
associated with the agreement and the ramifications of the City of Lino Lakes request to not be
included in the agreement even though they are currently a member of the Centennial Fire
District. Attorney Glaser stated that Council needs to agree with and feel comfortable with the
Agreement prior to making a decision and he is not sure that the document addresses all
concerns. Attorney Glaser and Administrator Larson both stated that the item could be tabled to
the next meeting. Council questioned who was leading the passage of the agreement.
Administrator Larson stated that Fire Chiefs and the new radio communication system where
driving the agreement and its passage.
Council stated that there was concern regarding the current position of the Centennial Fire
District and the timing of the agreement along with funding, potential for loss of funding,
protection of Fire District's interests and potential for cooperative endeavors in the future;
however, desired to table the item at this time.
2. Downtown Concrete Intersection
Administrator Larson stated that the recently completed Downtown Color Concrete Study
unveiled no new information and their suggested remedy was to completely remove the existing
Page 3 of 6
53
City of Centerville
Council Meeting Minutes
April 23,2014
concrete and replace it with asphalt. Administrator Larson stated that he has discussed with
Anoka County that potential for this work to be completed at the same time as the Centerville
Road Project, however, the County has requested that the City provide design and specification
sheets for that portion of the roadway with financial implications for the City. Concensus of
Council was not to complete a quick fix by continuously patching the area but to promptly
rectify the issue by replacing the concrete with asphalt.
Engineer Statz stated that he would gather cost estimates and believed the previous time he
looked into the issue it would cost approximately $80,000 which included all of his fees.
Discussion ensued regarding the commencement of the Centerville Road Project in the fall and
waiting for the project to save money was too lengthy of a time period, whether the City would
need to solicit for bids if completing on own, best interest of the City to wait, repair and save
funding or initiate repairs now.
Motion by Council Member Fehrenbacher, seconded by Council Member Love to
authorize Staff to make a decision to either add to the County Centerville Road
Reconstruction Proiect or to reconstruct the intersections under a separate contract All
in favor. Motion passed.
3. Hugo Request for Funding Assistance—Bald Eagle Lake Dam
Administrator Larson stated that the Dam is located at the headwaters of the lake, if the dam
failed others downstream including: Centerville, Lino Lakes, White Bear Township and others
could be affected, the City of Hugo does not own the dam, would be applying for funding
through MNDot, the lake association's unwillingness to contribute funding and his belielf that
once several neighboring communities show support others will follow. Administrator Larson
discussed the relationship that has been formed with the City of Hugo by stating they assist with
storage of salt in the winter months, sweep our streets, etc.
Lengthy discussion ensued regarding the responsibility of the lake association, waiting for all
members of the Council to be present for action on the item, funding from excess 2013 budget,
consideration of a one-time donation, potential for additional requests due to funding shortfalls
and timing of payment.
Motion by Council Member Fehrenbacher, seconded by Council Member Love to
authorize $2,500 to the City of Hugo as a one-time donation for improvements associated
with the stabilization of the Bald Eagle Lake Dam. All in favor. Motion passed
IX. NEW BUSINESS
1. Consider Entering into Agreement with Minnesota Department of Health for Source
Water Protection Implementation Grant
Administrator Larson had previously reported that the City of Centerville was awarded a$10,000
grant for expenditures associated with the sealing of wells within the Royal Meadows
Development/wellhead protection area. Administrator Larson stated that if the entire grant can
Page 4 of 6
54
City of Centerville
Council Meeting Minutes
April 23,2014
be spent down before the end of the summer, in conjunction with the water project, the City will
again apply for another grant in the fall.
Motion by Council Member Fehrenbacher, seconded by Council Member Love to
authorize the City to enter into the presented agreement All in favor. Motion passed
2. Centerville Road - Utilities
Administrator Larson stated that surveys had been obtained from residents that would be affected
by municipal services (water/sewer) and the results are as follows:
6759 Centerville Road & vacant lot next door— willingness to connect home immediately upon
availability.
6756 Centerville Road — had concerns regarding how these improvements would affect their
property taxes, stated that they would not connect the existing home due to the potential for
demolition associated with future development of the property and understands that connection
fees would be likely when development of their property happens.
6719 Centerville Road & vacant lot next door — would like W/S improvements to be available
but would not connect at this time.
6716 Centerville Road & (possibly three vacant lots next door — willingness to contact home
immediately upon availability.
6709 Centerville Road — would like it to be available but would not connect at this time.
(Additional equipment would be needed to service basement of home).
Administrator Larson stated that funding for the improvements could come from both the sewer
and water funds which are healthy; offer an opportunity for connection when available with
assessments but defer connection fees and associated assessments until desired connection or
sunset date, lack of providing stub to Vickers property, reimbursement by developer once the
Vickers property is developed, cost savings associated with piggy-backing on the CSAH21
Street Improvement Project, other areas of town that need services (downtown and LaValle
Drive) and gravity fed sewer.
Lengthy discussion ensued regarding the deadline for County to include in their project (end of
May), drilling of services,widening of CSAH21.
Consensus was to table the item until the May 14, 2014 Council meeting.
3. Street Dance
Council Member Paar reported that the Centerville Lions would not be organizing or having their
annual street dance on Saturday, July 26, 2014 due to numerous factors (such as weather,
volunteers, etc.) Council Member Paar stated that Mr. Tom Lee has organized a music event
"The Jam" for Friday, July 25, 2014. Council Member Paar stated that he was unsure whether
the Lions desired to sell concessions at the music event and would be contacting them regarding
this item. City Attorney Glaser stated that either Kelly's Korner or Trio Inn could provide
something similar to the street dance within the confines of their businesses if desired. It was felt
Page 5 of 6
55
City of Centerville
Council Meeting Minutes
April 23,2014
that involvement of the City would have to be discussed in more detail; however,both businesses
could be approached for their consideration.
X. ANNOUNCEMENTS/UPDATES
1. Administrator Larson—None.
2. Council Member Paar stated that an upcoming Centennial Fire Steering Committee
would entail reviewing appraisals of the existing equipment.
XI. ADJOURNMENT
Motion by Council Member Paar, seconded by Council Member Love to Adiourn the
regularly scheduled 8:36 p.m. Council meeting of April 23, 2014 as presented. All in favor.
Motion passed.
Transcribed by City Staff Member Teresa Bender, City Clerk
Page 6 of 6
56
City Council 2014-04-09 Approximately 8:00 p.m.
Minutes of Work Session
Present were Mayor Tom Wilharber, Council members Jeff Paar, Steve King, D Love, and Ben
Fehrenbacher.
Present from Park and Rec were Suzanne Seeley and Kevin Amundsen. Present from P&Z were
Darrin Mosher,Russ Koski, Mark Haiden and Olaf Lee.
The purpose of the work session was to consider goals for 2014 and provide an opportunity for
committees to provide feedback to Council.
Mayor Wilharber reviewed the 2013 Goals adopted by the Council. Major goals approved by
Council included encouraging commercial/industrial development, sale of excess real estate
owned by the City and increasing collaboration with neighboring communities. Results of those
efforts have been mixed. Commercial/Industrial development and sale of excess real estate have
not been very successful, but collaboration with neighboring communities has been quite
successful and continues to be a priority.
Council member Fehrenbacher reviewed the Barr Engineering study that is currently looking at
the possible creation of a joint water utilities among the six area cities of Centerville, Lino Lakes,
Hugo, Columbus, Circle Pines and Lexington. The study should be complete in six months.
Park & Rec member Seeley stated that she did not agree with the sale of the lot on Mill Road.
The lot was acquired many years ago and the Park and Rec Committee has assumed that to be
park land. Research done by the City Administrator did not confirm why the lot was acquired,
but he could confirm that it was not a park dedication as a result of the plat. Also, the deed does
not place any restrictions on its use, so it appears that the Council is free to do as it wishes with
the property. The council previously took action to dedicate the sale proceeds toward debt
service on bonds to finance the Commerce Drive street project. Several comments were made
that using land proceeds to lower debt and taxes is a desirable goal.
Park and Rec reviewed its goals for the coming year, noting that they plan to install several
benches in the parks. Funding is short, so much discussion centered on ways to raise funds for
park capital equipment. There was general agreement that individuals and business are more
receptive to giving to a cause that has a defined and visible purpose, so benches seemed like a
good candidate for fund raising efforts. The possibility was discussed for an optional add-on to
the utility bill for individuals that want to make a contribution.
Mayor Wilharber thanked the Park & Rec Committee and the Planning & Zoning Commission
for their hard work in the past year.
The group discussed suggestions by P&Z member Montain that modified work schedules for city
employees that plow snow might save money, as well as looking for other partners if Lino Lakes
withdraws from the Centennial Fire District. Administrator Larson reported that work schedules
are modified to save on overtime for plowing snow and building ice rinks.
57
After considerable discussion by all, Mayor Wilharber suggested that the meeting be adjourned
unless there is something that has not been shared and then thanked everyone for participating.
The meeting was duly adjourned at 9:30 p.m.
Dallas Larson, Administrator
58
CITY OF CENTERVILLE 05/08/14 11:26 AM
Check Detail - 05-14-14 Page 1
Check
Date Check# Vender Name Comments Amount
4/30/2014 028649 HEALTH PARTNERS REPLACEMENT CHECK 28592 DATED 3-36-14-APRIL 2-14
Check Nbr 028649 HEALTH PARTNERS $3,967.67
4/30/2014 028650 MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL D.SCHMITZ-CLASS SD CERTIFICATION
Check Nbr 028650 MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL $45.00
4/30/2014 028651 SHI INTERNATIONAL CORP COMPUTER SOFTWARE $492.00
4/30/2014 028651 SHI INTERNATIONAL CORP COMPUTER SOFTWARE $246.00
4/30/2014 028651 SHI INTERNATIONAL CORP COMPUTER SOFTWARE $246.00
4/30/2014 028651 SHI INTERNATIONAL CORP COMPUTER SOFTWARE $273.00
Check Nbr 028651 SHI INTERNATIONAL CORP $1,257.00
4/30/2014 028652 SUN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY MAY 2014 DISABILITY INS $18.10
4/30/2014 028652 SUN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY MAY 2014 DISABILITY INS $127.64
Check Nbr 028652 SUN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY 145.74
4/30/2014 028653 USA MOBILITY WIRELESS,INC. FINAL PYMT FOR ON CALL PAGER-612-640-2534 $3.24
4/30/2014 028653 USA MOBILITY WIRELESS,INC. FINAL PYMT FOR ON CALL PAGER-612-640-2534 $3.23
Check Nbr 028653 USA MOBILITY WIRELESS.INC. $6.47
4/30/2014 028654 INTEGRA PHONE SERVICE TRHU 5-22-14 $33.92
Check Nbr 028654 INTEGRA 33.92
5/14/2014 028655 ABDO, EICK&MEYER, LLP AUDIT SERVICES PER AGREEMENT- 12-31-13 $2,333.33
5/14/2014 028655 ABDO,EICK&MEYER, LLP AUDIT SERVICES PER AGREEMENT- 12-31-13 $2,333.33
5/14/2014 028655 ABDO, EICK&MEYER, LLP AUDIT SERVICES PER AGREEMENT- 12-31-13 $2,333.34
Check Nbr 028655 ABDO EICK&MEYER LLP $7,000.00
5/14/2014 028656 CENTENNIAL LAKES POLICE DEPT POLICE SERVICES-MAY 2014
Check Nbr 028656 CENTENNIAL LAKES POLICE DEPT $57,321.25
5/14/2014 028657 CENTER POINT ENERGY 7087 20TH AVE S-SERV THRU 4-25-14 $12.59
5/14/2014 028657 CENTER POINT ENERGY 6970 LAMOTTE DR-SERV THRU 4-25-14 $97.55
5/14/2014 028657 CENTER POINT ENERGY 1880 MAIN ST-SERV THRU 4-25-14 $388.88
5/14/2014 028657 CENTER POINT ENERGY 1785 PELTIER LAKE DR-SERV THRU 4-25-14 $15.12
5/14/2014 028657 CENTER POINT ENERGY 2085 W CEDAR ST-SERV THRU 4-25-14 $514.50
5/14/2014 028657 CENTER POINT ENERGY 1737 MAIN ST-SERV THRU 4-25-14 $9.28
Check Nbr 028657 CENTER POINT ENERGY $1,037.92
5/14/2014 028658 CITY OF CENTERVILLE-MASTERCA ANTIFREEZE FOR BRINE EQUIPMENT $14.58
5/14/2014 028658 CITY OF CENTERVILLE-MASTERCA OFFICE SUPPLIES $273.19
5/14/2014 028658 CITY OF CENTERVILLE-MASTERCA SUPPLIES $124.03
5/14/2014 028658 CITY OF CENTERVILLE-MASTERCA ENDICA INTERNET POSTAGE $9.95
5/14/2014 028658 CITY OF CENTERVILLE-MASTERCA FUEL $684.79
5/14/2014 028658 CITY OF CENTERVILLE-MASTERCA SUPPLIES $451.76
5/14/2014 028658 CITY OF CENTERVILLE-MASTERCA TWIN 35W ROTATING HALOGEN $85.69
5/14/2014 028658 CITY OF CENTERVILLE-MASTERCA REPAIRS/MAINTENANCE-BLOWER&TRUCK MAINT. $776.82
5/14/2014 028658 CITY OF CENTERVILLE-MASTERCA FUEL $129.56
5/14/2014 028658 CITY OF CENTERVILLE-MASTERCA FUEL $357.65
5/14/2014 028658 CITY OF CENTERVILLE-MASTERCA POSTAGE-WATER SAMPLES $9.66
5/14/2014 028658 CITY OF CENTERVILLE-MASTERCA SCHOOLING&CONFERENCE-D.SCHMITZ $105.00
5/14/2014 028658 CITY OF CENTERVILLE-MASTERCA DOGGI DESPENSE W/LINERS $606.00
Check Nbr 028658 CITY OF CENTERVILLE-MASTERCA $3,628.68
5/14/2014 028659 CITY OF CIRCLE PINES MAY 2014 POLICE BLDG PYMNT $5,000.00
5/14/2014 028659 CITY OF CIRCLE PINES MAY 2014 POLICE BLDG PYMNT $496.46
Check Nbr 028659 CITY OF CIRCLE PINES $5,496.46
5/14/2014 028660 CONNEXUS ENERGY 6900 20TH AVE-LIFT STATION-SERV THRU 4-16-14 $63.61
5/14/2014 028660 CONNEXUS ENERGY 7100 20TH AVE N-TRAFSG-SERV THRU 4-24-14 $77.55
5/14/2014 028660 CONNEXUS ENERGY 7087 20TH AVE-SERV THRU 4-16-14 $150.28
5/14/2014 028660 CONNEXUS ENERGY 6800 20TH-RADIO FOR SCADA-SERV THRU 4-21-14 $13.29
5/14/2014 028660 CONNEXUS ENERGY 2085 W CEDAR ST-SERV THRU 4-16-14 $337.48
5/14/2014 028660 CONNEXUS ENERGY STREET LIGHTS-395653-219699-SERV THRU 4-22-14 $111.15
5/14/2014 028660 CONNEXUS ENERGY STREET LIGHTS-395653-219678- SERV THRU 4-22-14 $78.50
5/14/2014 028660 CONNEXUS ENERGY 6800 20TH-RADIO FOR SCADA-SERV THRU 4-21-14 13.29
'br 028660 CONNEXUS ENERGY 845.15
59
CITY OF CENTERVILLE 05/08/1411:26 AM
Page 2
Check Detail — 5-14-14
Check
Date Check# Vender Name Comments Amount
5/14/2014 028661 DAVE KICHLER INSPECTIONS,INC. ELECTRICAL INSPECTIONS
Check Nbr 028661 DAVE KICHLER INSPECTIONS INC $428.00
5/14/2014 028662 GOPHER STATE ONE CALL INC SERVICE THRU APRIL 2014 $30.45
5/14/2014 028662 GOPHER STATE ONE CALL INC SERVICE THRU APRIL 2014 $30.45
Check Nbr 028662 GOPHER STATE ONE CALL INC $60.90
5/14/2014 028663 HAWKINS WATER TREATMENT CHEMICALS
Check Nbr 028663 HAWKINS WATER TREATMENT $1,079.88
5/14/2014 028664 ISS 1880 MAIN ST-SYSTEM MONITORING
Check Nbr 028664 ISS $103.65
5/14/2014 028665 KATHI LAVALLE BBB COMBO-JUNE 10,2014
Check Nbr 028665 KATHI LAVALLE $225.00
5/14/2014 028666 LARSON, DALLAS MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT $104.94
5/14/2014 028666 LARSON, DALLAS MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT $25.76
Check Nbr 028666 LARSON DALLAS $130.70
5/14/2014 028667 LEE,OLAF REPLACEMENT CHECK FOR P&Z MEETINGS-7-2 8-13&9-10-
Check Nbr 028667 LEE OLAF $60.00
5/14/2014 028668 MCFOA T. BENDER MEMBERSHIP DUES
Check Nbr 028668 MCFOA $35.00
5/14/2014 028669 NATIONWIDE RETIREMENT SOLUTION DEF COMP W/H-PAY PERIOD 9
Check Nbr 028669 NATIONWIDE RETIREMENT SOLUTION $400.28
5/14/2014 028670 NIEHAUS, KATIE REIMBURSED PYMT 7373 PELTIER CIRCLE-PAID TWICE
Check Nbr 028670 NIEHAUS KATIE $75.00
5/14/2014 028671 PETERSON,TEDD REIMBURSE FOR RAIN SUIT
Check Nbr 028671 PETERSON TEDD $5c
5/14/2014 028672 SAM S CLUB P. PALZER&T. PETERSON MEMBERSHIP DUES
Check Nbr 028672 SAM S CLUB $90.Ou
5/14/2014 028673 STANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES IN CSAH 21 RECONSTRUCTION-SERV THRU 3-28-14 $6,047.15
5/14/2014 028673 STANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES IN 2014 STREET&UTILITY IMPROVEMENT-SERV THRU 3-28-14 $676.75
5/14/2014 028673 STANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES IN 2014 ROYAL MEADOWS-SERV THRU 3-28-14 $585.00
5/14/2014 028673 STANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES IN 21ST AVE CONSTRUCTION-SERV THRU 3-28-14 $275.68
5/14/2014 028673 STANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES IN CREDIT HANDAHL EASEMENT INV#765967 SEE EMAIL -$65.00
5/14/2014 028673 STANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES IN GENERAL ENGINEERING-SERV THRU 3-28-14 $1,516.20
Check Nbr 028673 STANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES IN $9,035.78
5/14/2014 028674 TOM HEIMERMAN DIRTY SHORTS BRASS BAND-JUNE 3,2014
Check Nbr 028674 TOM HEIMERMAN $250.00
5/14/2014 028675 XCEL ENERGY 1737 MAIN ST-SERV THRU 04-07-14
Check Nbr 028675 XCEL ENERGY $76.60
5/9/2014 585003E PERA PERA W/H PAY PERIOD 9
Check Nbr 585003 PERA $2,527.36
5/9/2014 585004E WELLS FARGO H.S.A.W/H-PAY PERIOD 9
Check Nbr 585004 WELLS FARGO $1.170.83
5/9/2014 585005E MINNESOTA DEPT OF REVENUE STATE W/H-PAY PERIOD 9
Check Nbr 585005 MINNESOTA DEPT OF REVENUE $1,059.92
5/9/2014 585006E IRS/EFTPS FED W/H-PAY PERIOD 9 $2,785.67
5/9/2014 585006E IRS/EFTPS FICA W/H-PAY PERIOD 9 $3,226.26
Check Nbr 585006 IRS/EFTPS $6.011.93
Total Checks$103,665.98
60
CENTENNIAL LAKES POLICE DEPT Check Register-Police GL without invoice numbers Page: 1
Check Issue Dates:4/26/2014-5/8/2014 May 08,2014 10:21AM
Report Criteria:
Report type: Summary
GL Check Ck No Description Check
Period Issue Date Payee Amount
04/14 04/30/2014 9891 VIKING ELECTRIC SUPPLY, INC REPLACEMENT BULBS 170.44 M
05/14 05/08/2014 9892 AMSAN , INC CLEANING SUPPLIES/TOWELS/TISSU 472.32
05/14 05/08/2014 9893 ANOKA COUNTY ATTORNEY FORFEITURE DISTRIBUTION 194.80
05/14 05/08/2014 9894 COVERALL OF THE TWIN CITIES MAY CLEANING SERVIVE 796.22
05/14 05/08/2014 9895 EMERGENCY MEDICAL PRODUCTS,I MEDICAL SUPPLIES DEFIB PADS 171.88
05/14 05/08/2014 9896 FRATTALLONES HARDWARE, INC. BATTERIES 5.33
05/14 05/08/2014 9897 MIDWAY FORD INC 2014 FORD EXPLORER 26,027.41
05/14 05/08/2014 9898 MHSRC/RANGE TRAINING WERNEKE/ZECH 938.00
05/14 05/08/2014 9899 NANCY NOREN REIMBURSEMENT FLOWERS 72,80
05/14 05/08/2014 9900 NEAL A. NOREN BLDG MTC HOURS 120.00
05/14 05/08/2014 9901 SHRED-N-GO, INC SHREDDING 35.00
05/14 05/08/2014 9902 STATE OF MINNESOTA FORFEITURE DISTRIBUTION 97.40
05/14 05/08/2014 9903 SUN LIFE FINANCIAL MAY LIFE/DISABILITY 100.26
05/14 05/08/2014 9904 TACTICAL SOLUTIONS SALES TAX 305.00
05/14 05/08/2014 9905 TOP GREEN APRIL GROUNDS SERVICE 671.98
05/14 05/08/2014 9906 VERIZON WIRELESS CELL PHONES 580.06
05/14 05/08/2014 9907 VISUAL PRO 360, INC NEW VEH SETUP 2 CAR ADAPTORS 267.19
Grand Totals: 31,026.09
M=Manual Check,V=Void Check
61
CENTENNIAL LAKES POLICE DEPT Check Register-Police GL without invoice numbers Page: 1
Check Issue Dates:4/25/2014-4/25/2014 Apr 24,2014 03:34PM
Report Criteria:
Report type: Summary
GL Check Ck No Description Check
Period Issue Date Payee Amount
04/14 04/25/2014 201402 WELLS FARGO 2ND QUARTER HSA-DIRECT PAY 14,525.00
Grand Totals: 14,525.00
M=Manual Check,V=Void Check
62
CENTENNIAL LAKES POLICE DEPT Check Register-Police GL without invoice numbers Page: 1
Check Issue Dates:4/11/2014-4/24/2014 Apr 24,2014 03:33PM
Report Criteria:
Report type: Summary
GL Check Ck No Description Check
Period Issue Date Payee Amount
04/14 04/24/2014 9872 ANOKA COUNTY MAR INTERNET ACCESS 2,601.70
04/14 04/24/2014 9873 ANOKA CO TREASURY DEPT. MAY BROADBAND 75.00
04/14 04/24/2014 9874 CENTENNIAL UTILITIES MARCH UTILITIES 715.18
04/14 04/24/2014 9875 CENTURY LINK CENTERVILLE PHONE 57.20
04/14 04/24/2014 9876 CONNEXUS ENERGY MARCH ELECTRIC 2,964.10
04/14 04/24/2014 9877 DON'S CIRCLE SERVICE, INC VEH REPAIRS&MTC 1,910.78
04/14 04/24/2014 9878 E C S I, INC SEMI ANNUAL FIRE ALARM INSPECTI 276.00
04/14 04/24/2014 9879 ENVENTIS TELECOM, INC PHONES 399.95
04/14 04/24/2014 9880 GALES AUTO BODY, INC 2011 VEH REPAIR 885.84
04/14 04/24/2014 9881 HEALTH PARTNERS MAY HEALTH INS 9,897.50
04/14 04/24/2014 9882 HOLIDAY FLEET FUEL 4,143.13
04/14 04/24/2014 9883 INTOXIMETERS, INC SALES TAX 80.00
04/14 04/24/2014 9884 KEEPRS, INC UNIFORMS 19.72
04/14 04/24/2014 9885 LOFFLER SALES TAX 170.00
04/14 04/24/2014 9886 MN UNEMP INS 1ST QTR UNEMP INS 1,77
04/14 04/24/2014 9887 PLEAA PLEAA TRAINING DA/KH 100.00
04/14 04/24/2014 9888 PETTY CASH/JOE WRESSELL POSTAGE 50.65
04/14 04/24/2014 9889 QUILL CORPORATION OFFICE SUPPLIES 670.34
04/14 04/24/2014 9890 VISUAL PRO 360, INC 2-MICROSOFT OFFICE 598.48
Grand Totals: 25,617.34
M=Manual Check,V=Void Check
63
CENTENNIAL FIRE DISTRICT Check Register-FIRE GL Page: 1
Check Issue Dates:4/24/2014-5/1/2014 May 01,2014 03:37PM
Report Criteria:
Report type: Summary
GL Check Check Vendor Description Check
Period Issue Date Number Number Payee Amount
05/14 05/01/2014 6371 10650 ANDOVER FIRE DEPARTMENT FEMA-MEDICAL EXAMS 9,250.00
05/14 05/01/2014 6372 10665 ANOKA CHAMPLIN FIRE DEPT FEMA-EQUIPMENT PPE 6,400.00
05/14 05/01/2014 6373 11565 ASPEN MILLS, INC UNIFORMS 49.90
05/14 05/01/2014 6374 30485 CENTER MART MAR/APRIL FUEL 535.83
05/14 05/01/2014 6375 30495 CITY OF CENTERVILLE 1ST QTR UTILIITES STATION 3 3,421.44
05/14 05/01/2014 6376 30500 CENTURY LINK CENTERVILLE PHONE 57.20
05/14 05/01/2014 6377 50135 EMERGENCY RESPONSE SOL PPE EQUIPMENT REPAIRS 1,029.80
05/14 05/01/2014 6378 60300 FIRE SAFETY USA, INC PPE-HELMETS/FACE SHIELD/FI 1,262.00
05/14 05/01/2014 6379 80400 HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPAN FEMA-ELITEBOOK 840 G1 LAPT 1,236.54
05/14 05/01/2014 6380 120331 LEAGUE OF MN CITIES INS TR WORKERS COMP INS 2/14-2/15 36,194.00
05/14 05/01/2014 6381 130825 MINNESOTA UI FUND UNEMP BENEFITS 95.10
05/14 05/01/2014 6382 130827 MN STATE COLLEGES&UNIV SALES TAX 399.00
05/14 05/01/2014 6383 130840 MFSCB CERTIFICATION I EXAM 100.00
05/14 05/01/2014 6384 131470 MUNICIPAL EMERGENCY SERV PPE FIREFIGHTER GLOVES 5,240.87
05/14 05/01/2014 6385 140600 NAC STATION 2 HEATER MTC 735.55
05/14 05/01/2014 6386 160130 PERFORMANCE PLUS LLC FEMA-MEDICAL EXAMS 490.00
05/14 05/01/2014 6387 160150 PEARSON EDUCATION, INC TRAINING BOOKS 492.97
05/14 05/01/2014 6388 180600 CITY OF ROSEVILLE FEMA-COMPUTER MTC PLAN 1 2,080.00
05/14 05/01/2014 6389 200150 THOMAS MOTORS, INC 2010 F150 SERVICE 248.26
05/14 05/01/2014 6390 220200 VERIZON WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS 96.04
05/14 05/01/2014 6391 240200 XTREME CUSTOM APPAREL& STUDENT SHIRT 216.50
Grand Totals: 69,631.00
M=Manual Check,V=Void Check
64
CENTENNIAL FIRE DISTRICT Check Register-FIRE GL Page: 1
Check Issue Dates:4/5/2014-40/20114 Apr 21,2014 03:45PM
Report Criteria:
Report type: Summary
GL Check Check Vendor Description Check
Period Issue Date Number Number Payee Amount
04/14 04/21/2014 6346 10750 ANOKA CO CENTRAL COMMUN 2014 ANNUAL USER FEE 800 M 1,951.56
04/14 04/21/2014 6347 10850 ANOKA COUNTY TREASURY D MAY BROADBAND 187.50
04/14 04/21/2014 6348 11490 ARC STONE TECHNOLOGIES FEMA-WEBSITE HIOSTING 420.00
04/14 04/21/2014 6349 11565 ASPEN MILLS,INC UNIFORMS 275.70
04/14 04/21/2014 6350 20370 BOUND TREE MEDICAL LLC MEDICAL SUPPLIES 1,443.35
04/14 04/21/2014 6351 30480 CENTENNIAL UTILITIES MARCH UTILITIES STATOIN 1 678.07
04/14 04/21/2014 6352 31137 CONNEXUS ENERGY ELECTRIC STATION 1 655.94
04/14 04/21/2014 6353 60115 FAIRVIEW PHARMACY SERVIC MEDICAL SUPPLIES 73.38
04/14 04/21/2014 6354 60300 FIRE SAFETY USA, INC EQUIPMENT 2,541,90
04/14 04/21/2014 6355 60650 FRATTALLONE'S HARDWARE S MISC SUPPLIES 35.67
04/14 04/21/2014 6356 120180 LASER & CUTTING TECHNOLO FREIGHT 921.06
04/14 04/21/2014 6357. 120229 LEAGUE OF MN CITIES LOSS CONTROL WORKSHOP 40.00
04114 04/21/2014 6358 130840 MFSCB RECERTIFICATONS 28 FIREFIG 560.00
04/14 04/21/2014 6359 150054 OAK GROVE FIRE DEPT FEMA-PHYSICALS 2,100.00
04/14 04/21/2014 6360 150145 OFFICE MAX OFFICE SUPPLIES 517.68
04/14 04/21/2014 6361 160050 PAETEC PHONES STATION 2 157.48
04/14 04/21/2014 6362 160130 PERFORMANCE PLUS LLC PREPLACEMENT MEDICAL 245.00
04/14 04/21/2014 6363 160493 PREMIUM WATERS, INC BOTTLED H2O 11.14
04/14 04/21/2014 6364 190820 BENJAMIN J.STEPAN EMS INSTRUCTOR HOURS 135.00
04/14 04/21/2014 6365 200150 THOMAS MOTORS, INC VEH MTC 13 EXPLORER 116.06
04/14 04/21/2014 6366 210050 UDOR USA EQUIP MTC 115.30
04/14 04/21/2014 6367 210405 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED,INC UNIFORMS 126.00
04/14 04/21/2014 6368 220200 VERIZON WIRELESS CELL PHONES 105.78
04/14 04/21/2014 6369 230350 WHITE BEAR LOCKSMITH,INC BLDG LOCK MTC 95.00
04/14 04/21/2014 6370 240100 XCEL ENERGY ELECTRIC STATION 2 599.68
Grand Totals: 14,108.25
Payroll Checks#6335 - 6345
M=Manual Check,V=Void Check
65
CENTENNIAL FIRE DISTRICT Check Register-FIRE GL Page: 1
Check Issue Dates:4/22/2014-4/23/2014 Apr 23,2014 12:36PM
Report Criteria:
Report type: Summary
GL Check Check Vendor Description Check
Period Issue Date Number Number Payee Amount
04/14 04/23/2014 2014005 210300 US BANK VISA ACH-DUES FOR FIRE OFF 1,228.00
Grand Totals: 1,228.00
M=Manual Check,V=Void Check
66
ANOKA COUNTY
FIRE PROTECTION COUNCIL
JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this day of , 2014, by and
between the following governmental units: the cities of Anoka, Champlin, Andover, Bethel,
Centerville, Lino Lakes, Circle Pines, Coon Rapids, Columbia Heights, East Bethel, Fridley,
Ham Lake, Hilltop, Lexington, Nowthen, Oak Grove, Ramsey, St. Francis, Spring Lake Park,
Blaine, Mounds View and the Township of Linwood (collectively "Governmental Units").
WHEREAS, the above named governmental units have determined that it is mutually
beneficial for the governmental units to cooperatively address their long term needs for fire-
fighting equipment, fire records data systems, fire-fighter training, fire prevention, inspection
and public education; and
WHEREAS, the above named governmental units may enter into this joint powers
agreement pursuant to the authority set forth in Minn. Stat. § 471.59; and
WHEREAS, the above named governmental units have previously participated in
mutual aid agreements which have been successful in light of encouraging cooperation among
the group but do not provide sufficient legal authority for the group to meet upcoming needs
and desires; and
WHEREAS, the creation of a joint powers agreement will meet the legal needs for the
group to accomplish the goals as set forth herein, including interaction with the Anoka County
Joint Law Enforcement Council on the public safety data system; and
WHEREAS each of the governmental units have considered the alternatives and
agreed that creation of this joint powers agreement is in the governmental unit's best interest,
THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises and benefits that each party
shall derive herefrom, and other good and valuable consideration, the parties agree as follows:
ARTICLE I
Definitions
In the interpretation of this Agreement, the following definitions shall have the meanings given
to them.
(1) "Governmental unit" shall have the meaning ascribed in Minn. Stat. § 471.59.
(2) "Anoka County Fire Protection Council" or "FPC" is the name of the cooperative body
created by this Joint Powers Agreement.
D-1
67
(3) "Centennial Fire District" is an entity created by a joint powers agreement among the
cities of Centerville, Lino Lakes and Circle Pines.
(4) The "Spring Lake Fire Department, Inc." (also "SBM Fire Board") is a duly formed
Minnesota non-profit corporation providing contractual firefighting services to the cities
of Spring Lake Park, Blaine and Mounds View, Minnesota.
(5) "Anoka/Champlin Fire District" is a joint powers entity, created by a joint powers
agreement between the cities of Anoka and Champlin, Minnesota on
ARTICLE II
Purpose
This Agreement has been executed for the purpose of joining together to improve the
efficiency and effectiveness of fire and emergency services to the public within the geographic
service area of the members.
ARTICLE III
Term
The term of this Agreement shall commence on , 2014, notwithstanding the dates of
the signatures of the parties, and shall continue in full force and effect until any party
terminates their membership in this Agreement. The termination by any party, however, shall
not affect the validity of this Agreement as to the remaining parties.
ARTICLE IV
Delegation of Authority
The Governmental Units hereby delegate to the Fire Protection Council (FPC) all authority
necessary and convenient including, but not limited to, the ability to obtain grant monies,
finance, develop, design, construct, equip, own, staff and operate the mutual programs in
accordance with the terms of this Agreement. The FPC shall have all authority necessary or
convenient to accomplish the purpose of this Agreement in accordance with law.
ARTICLE V
Composition of the FPC
Each municipality, who is a party hereto, shall be a member of the FPC, except the cities of
Centerville's, Lino Lakes' and Circle Pines' memberships' shall be represented only by the
Centennial Fire District. The cities of Anoka's and Champlin's memberships' shall be
represented only by the Anoka/Champlin Fire District. The cities of Spring Lake Park's,
Blaine's and Mounds View's memberships' shall be represented only by the SBM Fire Board.
D-2
68
The cities of Ramsey's and Nowthen's memberships' shall be represented only by a
representative of the Nowthen/Ramsey joint powers agreement.
Each member shall be represented by one of its elected officials and its fire chief, or their
designee in the fire chief's absence, and each elected official and each fire chief shall have
one vote.
ARTICLE VI
By-laws
The by-laws of the FPC shall be as set forth in Attachment A, and incorporated herein.
ARTICLE VII
Withdrawal and Termination
7.1 Withdrawal.
A member city may withdraw from this Agreement effective on January 1, upon at least one
year's written notice to the President of the FPC. In the event of withdrawal by any party, this
Agreement shall remain in full force and effect as to all remaining member cities. Withdrawal
shall not act to discharge any liability incurred or chargeable to any member city or township
before the effective date of withdrawal. Such liability shall continue until appropriately
discharged by law or agreement.
7.2 Termination.
This Agreement shall terminate upon the occurrence of any one of the following events:
(1) When parties withdraw pursuant to Article VIII, so that it becomes impractical or
uneconomical to continue, in the judgment of the FPC as evidenced by a majority
vote.
(2) When necessitated by operation of law or as a result of a decision by a court of
competent jurisdiction;
(3) When all of the Governmental Units agree, by resolution, to terminate the
Agreement;
7.3 Effect of Termination.
Termination shall not discharge any liability incurred by any of the Governmental Units prior to
termination of this Agreement.
ARTICLE VIII
Liability and Insurance
8.1 Liability
Each party shall be responsible for its own acts and those of its elected officials, employees,
agents, and subcontractors and the results thereof, and shall not be responsible for the acts of
any other party, its elected officials, employees, agents, or subcontractors and the results
thereof, except as otherwise provided in this Agreement. Claims, liabilities, obligations, losses,
D-3
69
expenses (including reasonable attorney and other professional fees), judgments, and costs
paid or incurred by FPC, which arise out of its performance or failure to perform its duties
under this Agreement, shall be included in the annual operating budget for the next calendar
year, to the extent not covered by insurance proceeds or a self-insurance risk pool dedicated
to the Facility. Amounts included in the annual operating budget under this section shall be
pro-rated so that the total costs passed through to the member cities and township do not
exceed 10% of the annual operating budget.
8.2 Insurance
The FPC may purchase and maintain such insurance as will protect FPC and other member
Governmental Units against risk of loss or damage to the FPC, and to any FPC property,
personal or real, and any improvements located thereon and against claims which may arise
from the construction, operation, use or maintenance of the FPC property and any other
activities contemplated by this Agreement. The cost of any such insurance shall be included in
the annual operating budget established pursuant to Attachment A hereto.
ARTICLE IX
FPC Property
[Need to describe any property owned by the FPC]
ARTICLE X
General Provisions
10.1 Entire Agreement, Amendment.
This Agreement contains the entire agreement of the member cities and township and shall
supersede all oral and written agreements and negotiations by the parties relating to the
subject matter of this Agreement. This Agreement may be amended only by written
agreement of all member Governmental Units.
10.2 Severability.
The provisions of this Agreement are severable. If any paragraph, section, subdivision,
sentence, clause, or phrase of the Agreement is for any reason held to be contrary to law, or
contrary to any rule or regulation having the force and effect of law, such decision shall not
affect the remaining portions of this Agreement.
10.3 Notice.
All notices or communications required or permitted pursuant to this Agreement shall be either
hand delivered or mailed by U.S. Mail, at the following addresses:
Anoka/Champlin Fire District: Fire Chief Charlie Thompson
275 Harrison Street
Anoka Minnesota 55303
763-576-2860
D-4
70
City of Andover Fire Chief Dan Winkel
13875 Crosstown Blvd.
Andover, Minnesota 55304
763-755-9825
City of Bethel Fire Chief Dave Arcand
139 Broadway Street NW
Bethel, Minnesota 55005
763-434-4366
Centennial Fire District Fire Chief Jerry Streich
7741 Lake Dr.
Lino Lakes, Minnesota 55014
763-784-7472
City of Columbia Heights Fire Chief Gary Gorman
and Hilltop 825-41St Avenue NE
Columbia Heights, Minnesota
763-706-8152
City of Coon Rapids Fire Chief John Piper
11155 Robinson Drive NW
Coon Rapids, Minnesota
763-767-6471
City of East Bethel Fire Chief Mark DuCharme
2241-221st Avenue NE
East Bethel, Minnesota 55011
763-367-7886
City of Fridley Fire Chief John Berg
6431 University Avenue NE
Fridley, Minnesota 55432
763-572-3602
City of Ham Lake Fire Chief Don Krueger
15544 Central Avenue NE
Ham Lake, Minnesota 55304
763-434-9555
City of Lexington Fire Chief Gary Grote
9180 Lexington Avenue
Lexington, Minnesota 55014
763-784-2792
D-5
71
Township of Linwood Fire Chief Darryl Ballman
22817 Typo Creek Drive NE
Stacy, Minnesota 55079
651-462-0502
City of Oak Grove Fire Chief Curt Hallerman
19900 Nightingale Street NW
Cedar , MN 55011
763-404-7000
Cities of Ramsey and Nowthen Fire Chief Dean Kapler
7550 Sunwood Drive NW
Ramsey, Minnesota 55303
763-433-9886
City of St. Francis Fire Chief Dean Kapler
23340 Cree Street NW
St. Francis, Minnesota 55070
763-441-4452
Spring Lake Park Fire Dept., Inc. Fire Chief Nyle Zikmund
(SBM Fire Board) 1710 County Hwy 10
Spring Lake Park, MN 55432
763-786-4436
The addressees listed in this section shall be the authorized representatives of the parties for
purposes of sending and receiving notices and communications required or permitted pursuant
to this Agreement. Any party may change its address or authorized representative by written
notice delivered to the other parties pursuant to this section.
10.4: Independent Contractor.
For the purposes of the Agreement, each of the parties shall be deemed to be independent
contractors and not employees of any of the other parties. Any and all agents, servants, or
employees of a party or other persons, while engaged in the performance of any work or
services required to be performed by a party under the Agreement, shall not be considered
employees of any other party for any purpose.
10.5 Damages.
In the event of a party's failure to perform obligations under this Agreement, that party shall be
liable to the other parties for any and all damages reasonably sustained by the other parties as
a result of such failure.
10.6 Remedies Cumulative.
D-6
72
All remedies provided for herein or otherwise available at law or equity shall be cumulative.
The election of any remedy shall not bar other remedies available to the party.
10.7 Waiver of Default.
The waiver of any default by any party, or the failure to give notice of any default, shall not
constitute a waiver of any subsequent default or be deemed to be a failure to give such notice
with respect to any subsequent default. The making or acceptance of a payment by any party
with knowledge of the existence of a default shall not operate or be construed to operate as a
waiver of any subsequent default.
10.8 Subcontracts, Assignment
A Governmental Unit, may not subcontract, assign or otherwise transfer its obligations under
this Agreement.
10.9 Successors.
Each Governmental Unit binds itself and its successors, legal representatives, and assigns to
the other parties and to the partners, successors, legal representatives, and assigns of such
other parties, in respect to all rights and obligations under this Agreement.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties to this Agreement have hereunto set their hands on the
dates written below.
CITY OF ANOKA CITY OF CHAMPLIN
By: By:
Phil Rice, Mayor ArMand Nelson, Mayor
Dated: Dated:
ATTEST: ATTEST:
By: By:
Tim Cruikshank, City Manager Bret Heitkamp, City Administrator
Dated: Dated:
Approved as to Form and Execution: Approved as to Form and Execution:
By: By:
Scott Baumgartner, City Attorney Darrell Jensen, City Attorney
Dated: Dated:
D-7
73
CITY OF ANDOVER CITY OF BETHEL
By: By.
Mike Gamache, Mayor Todd Miller, Mayor
Dated: Dated:
ATTEST: ATTEST:
By: By.
Jim Dickinson, City Administrator Ginger Berg, City Clerk
Dated: Dated:
Approved as to Form and Execution: Approved as to Form and Execution:
By: By.
Scott Baumgartner, City Attorney Bill Goodrich, City Attorney
Dated: Dated:
CITY OF BLAINE CITY OF COLUMBIA HEIGHTS
By: By,
Tom Ryan, Mayor Gary Peterson, Mayor
Dated: Dated:
ATTEST: ATTEST:
By: By.
Clark Arneson, City Manager Walt Fehst, City Manager
Dated: Dated:
Approved as to Form and Execution: Approved as to Form and Execution:
By: By.
Patrick Sweeney, City Attorney Jim Hoeft, City Attorney
Dated: Dated:
CITY OF CENTERVILLE CITY OF CIRCLE PINES
By: By.
Thomas Wilharber, Mayor David Bartholomay, Mayor
D-8
74
Dated: Dated:
ATTEST: ATTEST:
By: By:
Dallas Larson, City Administrator James Keinath, City Administrator
Dated: Dated:
Approved as to Form and Execution: Approved as to Form and Execution:
By: By:
Kurt Glaser, City Attorney Kim Kozar, City Attorney
Dated: Dated:
CITY OF COON RAPIDS CITY OF EAST BETHEL
By: By:
Tim Howe, Mayor Richard Lawrence, Mayor
Dated: Dated:
ATTEST: ATTEST:
By: By:
Steve Gatlin, City Manager Jack Davis, City Administrator
Dated: Dated:
Approved as to Form and Execution: Approved as to Form and Execution:
By: By:
David Brodie, City Attorney Mark Vierling, City Attorney
Dated: Dated:
CITY OF FRIDLEY CITY OF HAM LAKE
By: By:
Scott Lund, Mayor Mike Van Kirk, Mayor
Dated: Dated:
D-9
75
ATTEST: ATTEST:
By: By:
Wally Wysopal, City Manager Doris Nivala, City Administrator
Dated: Dated:
Approved as to Form and Execution: Approved as to Form and Execution
By: By:
Darcy Erickson, City Attorney Wilbur Dorn, City Attorney
Dated: Dated:
CITY OF HILLTOP CITY OF LEXINGTON
By: By:
Jerry Murphy, Mayor Michael Pitchford, Mayor
Dated: Dated:
ATTEST: ATTEST:
By: By:
Ruth J. Nelson, City Clerk Bill Petracek, City Administrator
Dated: Dated:
Approved as to Form and Execution: Approved as to Form and Execution:
By: By:
Carl J. Newquist, City Attorney Kurt Glaser, City Attorney
Dated: Dated:
CITY OF LINO LAKES TOWNSHIP OF LINWOOD
By: By:
Jeff Reinert, Mayor Phillip Osterhus, Chair, Board
of Supervisors
Dated: Dated:
ATTEST: ATTEST:
By: By:
D-10
76
Jeff Karlson, City Administrator Judy Hanna, Town Clerk
Dated: Dated:
Approved as to Form and Execution: Approved as to Form and Execution:
By: By.
Kurt Glaser, City Attorney Mike Haag, City Attorney
Dated: Dated:
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW CITY OF NOWTHEN
By: By.
Joe Flaherty, Mayor William Schulz, Mayor
Dated: Dated:
ATTEST: ATTEST:
By: By.
James Ericson, City Administrator Corrie LaDoucer, City Clerk
Dated: Dated:
Approved as to Form and Execution: Approved as to Form and Execution:
By: By.
Scott Riggs, City Attorney Robert Ruppe, City Attorney
Dated: Dated:
CITY OF OAK GROVE CITY OF RAMSEY
By: By.
Mark Korin, Mayor Sarah Strommen, Mayor
Dated: Dated:
ATTEST: ATTEST:
By: By.
Rick Juba, City Administrator Kurt Ulrich, City Administrator
Approved as to Form and Execution: Approved as to Form and Execution:
D-11
77
By: By:
Robert Vose, City Attorney Joseph Langel, City Attorney
CITY OF SPRING LAKE PARK CITY OF ST. FRANCIS
By: By:
Cindy Hansen, Mayor Jerry Tveit, Mayor
Dated: Dated:
ATTEST: ATTEST:
By: By:
Daniel Buchholtz, City Administrator Matthew Hylen, City Administrator
Dated: Dated:
Approved as to Form and Execution: Approved as to Form and Execution
By: By:
Jeffrey Carson, City Attorney James Hoeft, City Attorney
Dated: Dated:
D-12
78
Revision 04-29-2014
PETITION AND WAIVER AGREEMENT
This Agreement made this / day of May, 2014, by and between the City of
Centerville, a Minnesota municipal corporation ("City"), and R & R Leasing, Inc., a Minnesota
corporation ("Owner").
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, the Owner is the fee owner of certain real property in the City described in
Exhibit A hereto (the "Subject Property"); and
WHEREAS, the Owner desires to have certain public improvements to serve the Subject
Property as described in Exhibit B hereto (hereinafter referred to as the "Improvement Project");
and
WHEREAS, the Owner wishes the City to construct the Improvement Project without
notice of hearing or hearing on the special assessments levied to finance the Improvement
Project, and to levy up to $36,000 of the cost of the Improvement Project against the Subject
Property; and
WHEREAS, the City is willing to undertake the Improvement Project without certain
notices or hearings, provided the assurances and covenants hereinafter stated are made by the
Owner to ensure that the City will have valid and collectable special assessments as they relate to
the Subject Property to finance all of the costs of the Improvement Project and that all necessary
right-of-way is provided to the City, at no cost to the City; and
79
WHEREAS, were it not for the assurances and covenants hereinafter provided, the City
would not undertake the Improvement Project without such notices, hearings and is doing so
solely at the behest, and for the benefit, of the Owner.
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY AGREED BY AND BETWEEN THE PARTIES
AS FOLLOWS:
1. The Owner hereby petitions the City for the Improvement Project.
2. The Owner represents and warrants that it is the owner of 100 percent of the
Subject Property, that is has full legal power and authority to encumber the Subject Property as
herein provided, and that as of the date hereof, it has, fee simple absolute title in the Subject
Property, which is not subject to any liens, interests or encumbrances, except as listed on the
attached Exhibit C.
3. The Owner requests that up to $36,000 of the cost of the Improvement Project be
assessed against the Subject Property("Project Cost"). The parties agree and understand that the
principal amount to be assessed for the Improvement Project will not exceed the Project Cost.
4. The Owner waives notice of hearing and hearing pursuant to Minn. Stat. section
429.031, on the Improvement Project, notice of hearing and hearing on the special assessments
levied to finance the Improvement Project pursuant to Minn. Stat. section 429.061, and any
notice of hearing or procedure specified under law; and specifically requests that the
Improvement Project be undertaken and special assessments levied therefore against the Subject
Property without hearings.
5. The Owner waives the right to appeal the levy of the special assessments in
accordance with this Agreement pursuant to Minn. Stat. section 429.081, or reapportionment
thereof upon land division pursuant to Minn. Stat. section 429.071, subd. 3, or otherwise, and
further specifically agrees with respect to such special assessments against the Subject Property
or reapportionment that:
a. Any requirements of Minn. Stat. chapter 429 with which the City does not comply
are hereby waived by the Owner;
b. The increase in fair market value of the Subject Property resulting from the
Improvement Project will be at least equal to the amount specified in paragraph 3,
and that such increase in fair market value is a special benefit to the Subject
Property;
C. Assessment of the above-specified cost of the Improvement Project against the
Subject Property is reasonable, fair and equitable and there are no other properties
against which such cost should be assessed; and
2
80
d. The Owner further specifically waives notice and right to appeal reapportionment
of such special assessments upon land division pursuant to Minn. Stat. section
429.071, subd. 3.
6. The Owner understands and agrees that the City may provide for the payment of
such special assessments in installments over a period of five(5) years bearing an interest rate of
5%. However, the decision regarding the period of time over which the special assessments may
be paid and the interest rate to be applied is in the absolute and sole discretion of the city council,
subject only to limitations imposed by law.
7. Except for its classification as "Green Acres" under Minnesota Statute Section
273.111, Owner represents and warrants that the Subject Property is not otherwise classified for
tax purposes as to result in deferral of the obligation to pay special assessments. Owner agrees
that it will take no action to secure such tax status for the Subject Property during the term of this
Agreement, and agrees that it shall not seek deferral of payments of this special assessment. As a
guarantee to ensure that no payments are deferred, Owner agrees to give the City a Mortgage in
the amount of the Project Cost, Design Cost, or other costs or expenses incurred pursuant to this
Agreement ("Indebtedness")%
a. The Owner hereby Mortgages, with power of sale, the Subject Property, for the
amount of the Indebtedness agreed herein, and payments shall be due as specified
herein and in paragraph three.
b. If Owner (i) pays the Indebtedness to the City according to the terms of the
promissory note, and/or as set forth in this Agreement and all renewals,
extensions, and modifications thereto (the "Note"); (ii) pays interest on the
Indebtedness as provided in the Note; (iii) keeps and performs all the covenants
and agreements contained herein, then the Owner's obligations under this
Mortgage will be satisfied, and the City will deliver an executed satisfaction of
Mortgage to Owner. It is the Owner's responsibility to record any satisfaction of
the Mortgage at the Owner's expense.
C. Owner makes and includes in this Mortgage the following covenants and
provisions set forth in Minn. Stat. section 507.15, and the relevant statutory
covenant equivalents contained therein are hereby incorporated by reference:
i. To warrant title to the Subject Property;
ii. To pay the Indebtedness as herein provided;
iii. To pay all taxes and assessments;
iv. That the Subject Property shall be kept in repair and no waste shall be
committed;
v. To pay principal and interest on prior mortgages (if any).
d. In case of default (i) in the payment of the sums to paid under the Note, this
Mortgage or this Agreement, when the same becomes due, (ii) in any of the
3
81
covenants set forth in this Mortgage, (iii) under the terms of the Note, (iv) under
the terms of this Agreement, or(v) under any addendum attached to this Mortgage
or this Agreement, the City may declare the unpaid balance of the Note or
Indebtedness and the interest accrued thereon, together with all sums and
advanced hereunder, immediately due and payable without notice, and Owner
authorizes and empowers the City to foreclose this Mortgage by judicial
proceedings or to sell the Subject Property at public auction and convey the same
in fee simple in accordance with Minn. Stat. Chapter 580, and out of the monies
arising from such sale, to retain all sums secured hereby, with interest and all
legal costs and charges of such foreclosure and the maximum attorneys' fees
permitted by law, which costs, charges, and fees Owner agrees to pay.
8. The covenants, waivers and agreements contained herein shall bind the successors and
assigns of the Owner and shall run with the Subject Property and bind all successors in interest
thereof. It is the intent of the parties hereto that this document be in a form that is recordable
among the land records of Anoka County, Minnesota; and they agree to make any changes herein
which may be necessary to effect the recording and filing of this document against the title of the
Subject Property.
9. This Agreement shall terminate upon the final payment of all special assessments
levied against the Subject Property regarding the Improvement Project, and the City shall
thereupon execute and deliver such documents, in recordable form, as are necessary to
extinguish its rights hereunder.
10. No remedy herein conferred upon or reserved to the City is intended to be
exclusive of any other available remedy or remedies, but each and every such remedy shall be
cumulative and shall be in addition to every other remedy given under this Agreement or now or
hereafter existing at law or in equity or by statute.
11. No delay or omission to exercise any right or power accruing upon any default
shall impair any such right or power or shall be construed to be a waiver thereof, but any such
right and power may be exercised from time to time and as often as may be deemed expedient by
the City.
12. In the event any provision of this Agreement shall be held invalid, illegal, or
unenforceable by any court of competent jurisdiction, such holding shall not invalidate or render
unenforceable any other provision hereof, and the remaining provisions shall not in any way be
affected or impaired thereby.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have set their hands the day and year first written
above.
4
82
CITY OF CENTERVILLE R&R LEASING, INC.
By By,,"
Its Mayor Gordon W Rehbein, President
By Its City Clerk By �W��
Gerald L Rehbein. Vice Pres.
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
ss.
COUNTY OF ANOKA )
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of ,
2014, by Tom Wilharber and Teresa Bender, the Mayor and City Clerk of the City of
Centerville, Minnesota, a municipal corporation under the laws of the State of Minnesota, on
behalf of the City.
Notary Public
STATE OF FAoj i UC-, )
ss.
COUNTY OF Ct -4(V S )
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this J day of ,
2014,by Gordon W Rehbein President &R Leasing.
KNPAULNE:EE2179143
otary Public.SCommission�comm.expire
ary Public
STATE OF A'I�l 2y 00, )
} ss.
COUNTY OF PER�_u )
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this �day of ,
2014,by Gerald L Rehbein, Vice-President of R&R Leasing.
O
Notary P U 0
VAc
d,.••a,,, MARY C. BO��RptJE2
Notary Public-State of Anzona
PINP.L COUNTY
My Commission Expires
May 13,2015
5
83
EXHIBIT A
LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY
PIN #24-31-22-32-0001
UNPLATTED VILLAGE OF CENTERVILLE NW 1/4 OF SW 1/4 SEC 24 31 22 AND 1/4 ACRE IN NE 1/4 OF SW 1/4 DESC AS
FOL, COM AT NE COR OF NW 1/4 OF SW 1/4,TH E ALONG N LINE OF SW 1/4, 16 1/2 FT,TH AT RT ANGLES&SWLY IN A
STRAIGHT LINE TO SE COR OF NW 1/4 OF SW 1/4,TH N ALONG ELY LINE OF NW 1/4 OF SW 1/4 TO PLACE OF BEG.
PIN#24-31-22-32-0003
THAT PRT OF NWI/4 OF SWI/4 OF SEC 24 TWP 31 RGE 22 LYG NLY OF S 662.45 FT THEREOF, EX RD, SUBJ TO EASE OF
REC
6
84
EXHIBIT B
IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
City will engage the services if Houston Engineering via agreement with Rice Creek
Watershed District RCWD) to attempt to prove the.flood elevations contained in earlier
studies of RCWD, satisfactory to Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA),in an
effort to include the lower flood elevations in the flood insurance rate map update being
undertaken by FEMA and scheduled to be adopted in 2014.
7
85
Bald Eagle Waterski Shows Inc.
P.O Box 10681
White Bear Lake MN 55110
763-441-3687
dhavel@electromn.com
April 29, 2014
Centerville City Council
1880 Main St
Centerville MN 55038
Dear Centerville City Council:
In a recent meeting with Dallas Larson he mentioned there may be interest by the city of Centerville to
purchase the land that the Bald Eagle Ski Shows currently uses for our show site from the city of st Paul. Bald
Eagle Ski Shows would like to offer whatever assistance we can to help make this happen.The Bald Eagle
Waterski show has been proud to call Centerville our home for almost 25yrs.securing our location in
Centerville is important to the future of our team
The move to our current show site a few years ago has had a very positive effect on our club as well as the
community. Our membership has seen new growth with skiers from Centerville and the surrounding area.
Spectators come from around the twin cities to watch our weekly shows offering overwhelmingly positive
reviews.They appreciate the family friendly entertainment.The quality of local businesses to spend money
for food and refreshments before and after the show helps bring good crowds on a weekly basis.
We feel the financial impact our show provides to local businesses and the quality entertainment value would
offer strong community support for the purchase of the land. Bald Eagle Ski Show would offer our community
support as well as some financial support.As a non-profit our financial strength can vary year to year but we
would be willing to offer up to$5000.00 dollars over a period of time. By securing the land for our use for years
to come,we feel our potential for growth will be worth the investment in time and money.
Sincerely
Dean Have)
President Bald Eagle Water Ski Shows.
86
STATE OF MINNESOTA DISTRICT COURT
COUNTY OF ANOKA TENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT
In Re Petition of ) PETITION UNDER
GDI INVESTMENTS#1 LLC ) M.S.A. § 278.01 ET SEQ.
for a Determination of )
Objections to Certain Taxes ) COURT FILE NO.
Payable in the Year 2014 ) Other Civil
Your Petitioner, GDI INVESTMENTS #1 LLC, respectfully represents and presents to the Court
Petitioner's claim for relief under M.S.A. § 278.01 et seq., and alleges as follows:
1.
That Petitioner is the owner of the parcels of real estate in the City of Centerville, County of
Anoka, State of Minnesota, legally described on Exhibit A attached hereto and made a part hereof, said
property being described for assessment purposes as located in the Property Identification Numbers set
forth on said Exhibit A.
II.
That for the purposes of taxation, the market value of said parcels of real estate was, as of
January 2, 2013, estimated to be in the amounts set forth on said Exhibit A.
III.
That on the basis of the valuations set forth on Exhibit A, real estate taxes payable in 2014 with
respect to said parcels of real estate have been levied in the amounts set forth on Exhibit A.
(Continued on next page)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Due and personal service of 4 copies of this Due and personal service of 1 copy of this
petition is hereby admitted this day of petition is hereby admitted this day of
April 2014. April 2014.
Anoka Co. Property Tax Administrator for:
Anoka Co. Assessor and
Auditor/Treasurer Anoka Co. Attorney
By By
N.
That the foregoing valuation of said real estate is excessive and greater than its real or actual value,
and discriminates against the real estate in favor of comparable properties. To the extent that the total
market value assigned to said real estate exceeds actual market value or discriminates against said real
estate, said real estate has been partially, unfairly, unequally valued for the said year in violation of
M.S.A. § 273.11 and in violation of Article X, section 1, of the Constitution of the State of Minnesota;
and that the tax levied against the same is illegal in whole or in part, within the meaning and
contemplation of M.S.A. § 278.01, et. seq. To the extent that the tax levied against said real estate is
based on a total market value which exceeds actual market value or discriminates against said real estate,
the real estate will be taken without due process of law, in violation of Article I, section 7 of said
Constitution.
V.
That the limitations on relief set forth in M.S.A. § 278.05 subd. 4(d) unconstitutionally violate the
prohibitions against (i) denial of due process, (ii) denial of equal protection of the laws, (iii) lack of
uniformity in taxation, (iv) denial of redress of injuries or wrongs, and (v) exercise by the legislature of
powers properly belonging to the judiciary, contained in the state and federal constitutions.
VI.
That for purposes of real estate taxation,the real estate is improperly classified.
WHEREFORE, the Petitioner prays that the Court determine and adjudicate the validity of its
claim and objections as above set forth; that it determine the fair and proper valuation of said real
property for tax purposes as of January 2, 2013; that it award costs, disbursements and interest to
Petitioner; that it declare the limitation of relief contained in M.S.A. § 278.05 subd. 4(d) unconstitutional;
that it classify the property in accordance with the law; and that it award such other relief as the court
deems just and equitable.
The undersigned hereby acknowledges that costs, disbursements, and reasonable attorney and
witness fees may be awarded to the party against whom the allegations in this pleading are asserted
pursuant to Minn. Stat. §549.21, subd. 2.
Dated: April , 2014. GRAY,PLANT, MOOTY,MOOTY & BENNETT, P.A.
By l
Edward J. orne No. 0061025
Laura J. Siaukach-,
enbauer,AttAtto ey No. 18312X
Attorneys for Petitioner
500 IDS Center
80 South Eighth Street
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402
Telephone: (612)632-3000
GDI/Anoka County
GP 3657515 v]
-2-
EXHIBIT A
Legal Description PIN 2013 Taxable 2014 Taxes
Market Value Payable
Lot 11, Block 3, Pheasant Marsh 3`d Addition 23-31-22-43-0032 $67,200.00 $1,541.01
Lot 10, Block 3, Pheasant March 3`d Addition 23-31-22-43-0031 $67,200.00 $1,541.01
Lot 9, Block 3, Pheasant Marsh 3`d Addition 23-31-22-43-0030 $67,200.00 $1,541.01
Lot 8, Block 3, Pheasant Marsh 3`d Addition 23-31-22-43-0029 $67,200.00 $1,541.01
Lot 7, Block 3, Pheasant Marsh 3`d Addition 23-31-22-43-0028 $67,200.00 $1,541.01
Lot 6, Block 3, Pheasant Marsh 3`d Addition 23-31-22-43-0027 $74,900.00 $1,717.16
Lot 5, Block 3, Pheasant Marsh 3`d Addition 23-31-22-43-0026 $74,900.00 $1,717.16
Lot 4, Block 3,Pheasant Marsh 3`d Addition 23-31-22-43-0025 $74,900.00 $1,717.16
Lot 3, Block 3,Pheasant Marsh 3`d Addition 23-31-22-43-0024 $74,900.00 $1,717.16
Lot 2, Block 3,Pheasant Marsh 3`d Addition 23-31-22-43-0023 $74,900.00 $1,717.16
Lot 1, Block 3, Pheasant Marsh 3`d Addition 23-31-22-43-0022 $74,900.00 $1,717.16
Lot 10, Block 2, Pheasant Marsh 3`d Addition 23-31-22-43-0021 $89,800.00 $2,060.12
Lot 9, Block 2, Pheasant Marsh 3`d Addition 23-31-22-43-0020 $89,800.00 $2,060.12
Lot 7, Block 2, Pheasant Marsh 3`d Addition 23-31-22-43-0018 $89,800.00 $2,060.12
Lot 6, Block 2, Pheasant March 3`d Addition 23-31-22-43-0017 $82,600.00 $1,895.02
Lot 4, Block 2, Pheasant Marsh 3`d Addition 23-31-22-43-0015 $89,800.00 $2,060.12
Lot 3, Block 2, Pheasant Marsh 3`d Addition 23-31-22-43-0014 $89,800.00 $2,060.12
Lot 2, Block 2, Pheasant Marsh 3`d Addition 23-31-22-43-0013 $82,600.00 $1,895.02
Lot 1, Block 2, Pheasant Marsh 3`d Addition 23-31-22-43-0012 $67,200.00 $1,541.01
Lot 6, Block 1, Pheasant Marsh 3`d Addition 23-31-22-43-0011 $67,200.0 $1,541.01
Lot 5, Block 1, Pheasant Marsh 3`d Addition, 23-31-22-43-0010 $67,200.00 $1,541.01
subject to easement of record
Lot 4, Block 1, Pheasant Marsh 3`d Addition 23-31-22-43-0009 $67,200.00 $1,541.01
GDI/Anoka County
134816
GP.3657515 vl
-3-
Service of copie(s)of the attached
Petition is hereby admitted
Date:
jM;Q 7%
CC)C
Division Manager
Anoka County
Pro�arty,
�R,ec rds 8 Taxation
by:_,�� t�
DP", ty
c�( J K-VICE
MINNESOTA TAX COURT REAL PROPERTY TAX PETITION MINN. STAT. CHAPTER 278
1. Petitioner Name(s): 2. Indicate The Tax Court Division Being Appealed To:
Richard Pearson Regular Division
❑ Small Claims Division
Upon this selection, Petitioner is aware of the fact that no
appeal may be had from a Small Claims Judgment and agrees
that the decision of the Tax Court shall be conclusive.
3. Property Location: 4. Petitioner's Interest in The Subject Property-
City/Township Centerville
9 Owner or Part Owner
County of Anoka ❑ Other(please specify):
5. Property Description: You must ATTACH to this petition and to each copy of this petition ONE OF THE
FOLLOWING: (a) the contested notice of valuation, (b) property tax statement, or (c) a legal description of the
property(including the Property, I.D.Number).
6. Assessment Date: January 2,2013 for taxes payable in the year 2014.
7. Petitioner alleges the following error in the assessment (check any applicable boxes) and requests from the Tax
Court a judgment correcting the errors:
Estimated market value is greater than property's ❑ Classification is incorrect.
actual market value.
El The subject property is exempt from taxation.
El subject property is unequally assessed when
compared with other property. ❑ Other(please specify):
8. Attorneynture: 8a. Petitioner(s) Signature: (if not using an attorney)
Signature of Attorney for etitioner Signature of Petitioner(s)
Marvin A. Liszt
Please Print Attorney's Name Please Print Petitioner(s)Name
Attorney Registration No. 63848 Petitioner(s)Address:
Attorney Address:
Bernick Lifson, P.A.
5500 Wayzata Blvd., Ste. 1200
Minneapolis, MN 55416 Telephone Nos.:
Telephone: 763-546-1200 Work: ( )
Facsimile: 763-546-1003 Home: ( )
EXPLANATION OF PROOF OF SERVICE
Proof of service tells the court that you have served the appropriate county officials with the required copies of the petition. Completion of this part
of the form is required only on the original petition form,which you will file with the District Court Administrator's Office of the County where the
property is located. Types of proof of service are provided below. Use only one of these methods of service:
1) Admission of Service: As you deliver the required copies to the county officials, have the official (or deputy of that office) sign for the
copy(ies)as you deliver them.
2) Affidavit of Personal Service: If you have someone else(who is not a party to the appeal,such as a process server) deliver the required
copies of the petition to the appropriate county officials,that person must sign a notarized statement that they made the delivery.
ADMISSIONS OF SERVICE
Service of copy(ies)of Petition is hereby admitted Service of copy(ies)of Petition is hereby admitted
this day of )2014. this day of ,2014.
Assessor of County. Auditor of County.
By: By:
Service of copy(ies)of Petition is hereby admitted Service of copy(ies)of Petition is hereby admitted
this day of 12014. this day of ,2014.
Treasurer of County. County Attorney of County.
By: By:
AFFIDAVIT OF PERSONAL SERVICE
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
) SS.
COUNTY OF )
being first duly sworn, says that in connection with the filing of this property tax petition in
County,Minnesota,he/she has served the appropriate county official as follows:
Delivery of true and correct copies of the petition to the County Assessor's Office on the day of
12014.
Delivery of true and correct copies of the petition to the County Auditor's Office on the day of
,2014.
Delivery of true and correct copies of the petition to the County Treasurer's Office on the day of
32014.
Delivery of true and correct copies of the petition to the County Attorney's Office on the day of
2014.
Petitioner's Agent
Subscribed and sworn to before me
this day of 32014.
Notary Public
Page 1 of 2
vmwmc w the Web siu of
Anoka County
Property Account Summary
urrent General Information
Property ID 23-31-22-44-0008
Situs Address 6845 20TH AVE S,CENTERVILLE,MN 55038-0000
THAT PRT OF S 250 FT OF N 910 FT OF SEI/4 OF SE1/4 OF SEC 23 TWP 31 RGE 22 LYG ELY OF FOL DESC LINE: COM
Property AT SE COR OF SD SEC,TH N 00 DEG 41 MIN 52 SEC E,ASSD BRG,ALG E LINE OF SO SEC 670.74 FT TO S LINE OF N
Description 660 FT OF SD 1/4 1/4,TH N 88 DEG 32 MIN 26 SEC W ALG SD S LINE OF N 660 FT 404.35 TO POB OF SD LINE,TH S
00 DEG 20 MIN 01 SEC W 250.05 FT TO S LINE OF N 910 FT OF SO 1/4 1/4&SD LINETHERE TERM, EX RD,SUBJ TO
EASE OF REC
Last Sale Price 825,000.00
Last Sale Date 11/21/2013
Last Sale
Document Type LWDE LIMITED WARRANTY DEED
Linked Property
Group Position
Status Active
Abstract/Torrens jAbstract
Parties
Role Name
Owner RICHARD N PEARSON
Owner ITHE ESTATE OF JEAN M PEARSON
Document Recording Process Dates
Abstract Documents Have Been Recorded Through 03/28/2014
Abstract Documents Have Been Mailed Through 03/28/2014
Torrens Documents Have Been Recorded Through 03/31/2014
Torrens Documents Have Been Mailed Through 03/31/2014
Active Certificates Of Title
Type lCertificate Number Certificate Date
No Certificates Found
Documents Recorded Within 30 Days Of"Recorded Throu h"Dates Above
Type Abstract/Torrens Recorded Number Recorded Date
No Documents Found
Property Characteristics
Total Acres
2.03
Year Built
2001
*Lot Size: Approximate lot size in feet,clockwise beginning with the direction the lot faces
Tax District Information
School District Number and Name CENTENNIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT#12
City Name CENTERVILLE
Watershed RICE CREEK WATERSHED
Property Classification
Tax Year Classification
2014 3A-Commercial/Industrial/Public Utility
2013 3A-Commercial/Industrial/Public Utility
Property Values
Tax Year Description
2015 Est Market Land(MKLND) Amount
2015 Est Market Improvement(MKIMP) 161,700
2015 Market Value Prior to Hstd Excl. (TMVP) 894,700
2015 Taxable Market(TMTV) 1,056,400
2015 Est Market(MKTTL) 1,056,400
2014 Taxable Market(TMTV) 11056,400
1,023,700
https://prtinfo.co.anoka.mn.us/(z l 3kv455rs2i5enyrs 1 h3b45)/search.aspx 4/2/2014
Page 1 of 2
2014 lEst Market MKTTL 1,023,700
2014 Market Value Prior to Hstd Excl.(TMVP) 1,023,700
2013 Taxable Market(TMTV) 1,079,500
2013 Est Market(MKTTL) 1,079,500
2013 Market Value Prior to Hstd Excl. (TMVP) 1,079,500
Tax Amounts for MSPR
Tax Year IDescription Amount
2014 Total Tax Amounts-Before Payments 45,373.94
2014 special Assessments(Included in Total) 388.83
Payment History for Past Three Years
Date Paid Tax Year Principal Interests,Penalties and Costs Amount Paid
11/15/2013 2013 23,731.23 1,898.50 25,629.73
11/15/2013 2011 51,690.68 18,566.85 70,257.53
05/01/2013 2013 23,731.22 0.00 23,731.22
10/11/2012 2012 25,306.71 0.00 25,306.71
04/30/2012 2012 1 25,306.701 0.001 25,306.70
12/23/2011 2010 50,143.09 12,736.36 62,879.45
12/23/2011 2009 46,905.93 17,261.38 64,167.31
12/23/2011 2008 23,574.681 11,401.99 34,976.67
Developed by Manatron,Inc.
@2010 All rights reserved.
Version 1.0.4367.23769
https://prtinfo.co.anoka.nm.us/(zl 3kv455rs2i5enyrs 1 h3b45)/search.aspx 4/2/2014
Service of copie(s)of the attached
Petition is hereby admitted
Date:_ ±/Z� L(4
'�"
Division Manager
An County
P perty_Rec res�Taxation r
by: �A
De,uty
CITY OF CENTERW LLE
�termile
MONTHL YENGINEER'S REPORT
For the May 14, 2014 City Council Meeting
L►Ianh�jt��f
Italics=New information.
Normal = No change from last report.
1. 2013 Street and Utility Improvements (193801520). Wear course paving is being discussed
with the contractor.
2. Centerville Road (CSAH 21) Reconstruction (193801639). The project will be sent to MNDOT
for review in mid-May. Easement acquisition is ongoing. Bidding is expected in the fall of 2014.
The Council will need to decide on whether or not to extend city sewer and water south of Dupre Rd.,
to the city limits with this project. City staff has provided a summary of the issues and costs associated
with this extension.
3. 2014 Street and Utility Improvements (193801941). The contracts for labor and materials have
been awarded. City staff is working to complete preparatory work on the streets to be overlaid,
including curb patching, structure adjustments and storm sewer repairs and additions.
4. Royal Meadows Water Main (193802483). The contracts for labor and materials have been
awarded. A preconstruction meeting was held the week of April 2e. Construction should begin within
the next few weeks.
5. 21s`Ave., North of Main St. (193802667). The project will extend city water to the north in order
to service future commercial/retail development in the area. Sewer service immediately along 21St Ave.
will come from Lino Lakes'facilities in 21'Avenue. Lino Lakes is administering this project.
City staff met with Anoka County staff and a realtor for the landowner to discuss access to CSAH 14
(Main Street) and CSAH 21 (20th Avenue) for the vacant land in the northeast quadrant of Main Street
and 20th Avenue. Some concept sketches were presented for an east-west connection through the area
between 20th and 21St Avenues.
6. Miscellaneous(193801743).
• Our water tower specialists have verified the post construction condition of the tower in
conjunction with some antenna work being done by T-Mobile, The contractor, however, will be
back to clean up the site which was severely rutted by their equipment.
• We are working to put together a quote package for replacement of the concrete intersections
with pavement on Main Street(CSAH 14).