HomeMy WebLinkAbout2016-02-02 P & Z Packet PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
C!-an— MEETING AGENDA
Tuesday, February 2, 2016
6:30 p.m. IF YOU ARE UNABLE TO
I. CALL TO ORDER MAKE THIS MEETING,
1. Roll Call PLEASE LET US KNOW AS
SOON AS POSSIBLE. THANK
IL APPEARANCES/PRESENTATION YOU!
III. PUBLIC HEARING
IV. OLD BUSINESS
1. Proposed Parking Design—Centennial School District#12 (Centerville Elementary)
a. 1709 Main Street—Condemnation Proceedings
2. Metropolitan Council System Statement
V. NEW BUSINESS
1. None
VI. DISCUSSION ITEMS
1. 2016 Fete des Lacs Festival Committee
2. Purchase Agreement—Waterworks Property & Vacant Parcel, (7281 & 7285 Main Street)
3. Ruffridge Johnson Termination of Purchase Agreement& Request for Renegotiation of
New Agreement (2065 Commerce Drive, 5 Acre Parcel)
4. Vacant Seats (2)
a. Application—Mr. Charles Reinhardt (from P & R)
b. Application—Mr. Pete Johnson
VII. CONSIDERATION OF MINUTES
1. January 5,2016 Planning& Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes
VIII. ADJOURNMENT
Planning& Zoning Commission Meeting—March 1, 2016, 6:30 p.m. (Council Chambers)
Parks &Recreation Committee Meeting—February 3, 2016, 6:30 p.m. (Council Chambers)
City Council Meeting—February 10, 2016, 6:30 p.m. (Council Chambers)
City Council Meeting—February 24, 2016, 6:30 p.m. (Council Chambers)
Parks &Recreation—February 6, 2016 - Family Skate Night, LaMotte Park (Hayrides 6:30 p.m. —8:30 p.m.,
popcorn, hot cocoa and bonfire (6:30 p.m. —9:00 p.m.)
Centerville Lions Ice Fishing Contest—February 20, 2016, Centerville Lake, Anoka County Boat Launch, 11:00
a.m. —2:00 p.m. (Weather Dependent) "CANCELLED"
Shake Your Shamrock 5K, 8K&Kid's 1/3K Walk/Runs—March 12, 2016, Kelly's Korner, 7:00 a.m. — 1:00 p.m.
Fete des Lacs, August 5, 6 & 7, 2016 (Parade, Kickball, Softball Tournament, 5K, 8K&Kids Run/Walk & Many
Other Activities)
Out Run Homelessness 5K, 8K& Kids Run/Walk—October 1, 2016, LaMotte Park, 7:00 a.m. —9:30 a.m.
1 -
R !. CENTOWLLE> ROAD
f ip
� � I
= I
L
� I e
� I
i I
I
PROGRESS IT I 1— • ('�
�• � o _ --a l J
A
I • I
_ D
I
ie
9
n BUS AND PARENT CENTENNIAL ® Larson
DROP-OFF EVALUATION PUBLIC SCHOOLS °'Inc.
J � OENTERVR1F ELaAOBrtARY BCNOOL 4707 NORTH ROAD
CR=PINE4,hM,wn.,m 0lwtw.,.q
N MM4 �"�"�`O•�'
September 17, 2015
Mike Ericson, City Administrator
City Of Centerville
1880 Main St
Centerville, MN 55038
RE; 2016 System Statameits
Dear Mr. Ericson:
The Metropolitan Council recently adopted Thrive MSP 2040 and updated regional system and
policies plans, including the 2040 Transportation Policy Plan, the 2040 Regional Parks Policy
Plan, the 2040 Water Resources Policy Plan, and the 2040 Housing Policy Plan. Accordingly,
the Council is now issuing system statements as required by state statute.
The system statement for your community, enclosed, shows how the changes to the Council's
regional system plans affect your community specifically. The distribution of System Statements
triggers the timeline for updating your local comprehensive plan, due to the Council by
December 31, 2018.
To help you with updating your plan, we are excited to introduce our updated Local Planning
Handbook (http://metrocounci1.org/handbook.aspx), which has transitioned into a web-based
guide. The updated Handbook provides clear and specific direction on the minimum
requirements for updating your plan, customized data and maps in the Community Pages
section, and an array of tools and resources to make it easier to complete your comprehensive
plan update and focus on value-added planning for your community.
You also find an electronic version of your system statement on your Community Page in the
online Local Planning Handbook. Additionally, system statements for all communities can be
found on our website at http://metrocouncif org/Communities/Planning/Local-PlanninQ-
Assistance/System-Statements.aspx.
If you have questions about your system statement or any of the materials at the links provided,
please contact Ryan Garcia, the Council sector representative from our Local Planning
Assistance staff assigned to work with your community, at 651-602-1832.
We look forward to working with you.
Sincerely,
6*Akdz--
Beth
Reetz, Director
Community Development Division
." North �.-
P 65 t 602 "" METROPOLITAN
C 0 U N C , L
}
.n
i
,
i
AL
.. y,w
2015 SYSTEM STATEMENT FOR
CITY OF CENTERVILLE
September 17, 2015
Regional Development Plan Adoption
In May 2014, the Metropolitan Councu adopted Innve MSI-204u. Following adoption of Thrive, the
Council adopted the 2040 Transportation Policy Plan, the 2040 Regional Parks Policy Plan, the 2040
Water Resources Policy Plan, and the 2040 Housing Policy Plan. The Metropolitan Council is now
issuing system statements pursuant to State statute
Receipt of this system statement and the metropolitan system plans triggers a community's obligation
to review and, as necessary, amend its comprehensive plan within the next three years, by the end of
2018. The complete text of Thrive MSP 2040 as well as complete copies of the recently adopted
metropolitan system and policy plans are available for viewing and downloading
at http.lhvww.metrocouncil.orq/Communities/Planning.aspx Paper copies are available by calling the
Council's Data Center at 651-602-1140.
System Statement Definition
Metropolitan system plans are long-range comprehensive plans for the regional systems-transit,
highways, and airports;wastewater services; and parks and open space-along with the capital
budgets for metropolitan wastewater services, transportation, and regional recreation open space.
System statements explain the implications of metropolitan system plans for each individual community
in the metropolitan area. They are intended to help communities prepare or update their comprehensive
plan, as required by the Metropolitan Land Planning Act:
Within nine months after receiving a system statement for an amendment to a metropolitan
system plan, and within three years after receiving a system statement issued in conjunction
with the decennial review required under section 473.864, subdivision 2. each affected local
governmental unit shall review its comprehensive plan to determine if an amendment is
necessary to ensure continued conformity with metropolitan system plans. If an amendment is
necessary, the governmental unit shall prepare the amendment and submit it to the council
for review.
Local comprehensive plans, and amendments thereto, will be reviewed by the Council for conformance
to metropolitan system plans, consistency with Council policies, and compatibility with adjacent and
affected governmental units. Updated local comprehensive plans are due to the Council for review by
December 31, 2018.
What is in this System Statement
The system statement includes information specific to your community, including:
o your community designation or designation(s);
® forecasted population, households, and employment through the year 2040;
B guidance on appropriate densities to ensure that regional services and costly regional
infrastructure can be provided as efficiently as possible.
A affordable housing need allocation;
Page-1 1 2015 SYSTEM STATEMENT--CENT ERVILLE INTRODUCTION
In the following sections, this system statement contains an overview of each of the system plan
updates and speck system changes that affect your community. The sections are:
• Transportation, including metropolitan highways, aviation, and transit
• Water Resources, including wastewater, surface water, and water supply planning
• Regional parks and trails
Dispute Process
If your community disagrees with elements of this system statement, or has any questions about this
system statement, please contact your Sector Representative, Ryan Garcia, at 651-602-1832, to review
and discuss potential issues or concerns.
The Council and local government units and districts have usually resolved issues relating to the
system statement through discussion.
Request for Hearing
If a local governmental unit and the Council are unable to resolve disagreements over the content of a
system statement, the unit or district may, by resolution, request that a hearing be conducted by the
Council's Land Use Advisory Committee or by the State Office of Administrative Hearings for the
purpose of considering amendments to the system statement. According to Minnesota Statutes section
473.857, the request shall be made by the local governmental unit or school district within 60 days after
receipt of the system statement. If no request for a hearing is received by the Council within 60 days,
the statement becomes final.
Page-2 1 261t :Y S I!-M SIA i th.LN1 - GEN It RVILL E INTRODUCTION
Regional Development Guide
The Council adopted Thrive MSP 2040 as the new regional
development guide on May 28, 2014. Thrive identifies five outcomes
that set the policy direction for the region's system and policy plans. ter
Building on our region's history of effective stewardship of our
resources, Thrive envisions a prosperous, equitable, and livable
region that is sustainable for today and generations to come. The
Council is directing its operations, plans, policies, programs, and
resources toward achieving this shared long-term vision.
Three principles define the Council's approach to implementing regional policy. Integration,
collaboration, and accountability. These principles reflect the Council's roles in integrating policy
areas, supporting local governments and regional partners, and promoting and implementing the
regional vision. The principles define the Council's approach to policy implementation and set
expectations for how the Council interacts with local governments.
Thrive also outlines seven land use policies and community designations important for local
comprehensive planning updates. The land use policies establish a series of commitments from the
Council for local governments and uses community designations to shape development policies for
communities. Community designations group jurisdictions with similar characteristics based on Urban
or Rural character for the application of regional policies. Together, the land use policies and
community designations help to implement the region's vision by setting expectations for development
density and the character of development throughout the region.
Community Designation
Community e�leeinnuiivne -r-+��n ii trisdictions ith 'L,r !laraCt
v�,y� v .J.� H Jw�u..rivuv�iv ir'iu �i�i�i�ai Ci iai a�.i2nStICS or the application of regional
policies. The Council uses community designations to guide regional growth and development;
establish land use expectations including overall development densities and patterns; and outline the
respective roles of the Council and individual communities, along with strategies for planning for
forecasted growth. If there are discrepancies between the Thrive MSP 2040 Community Designations
Map and the Community Designation map contained herein because of adjustments and refinements
that occurred subsequent to the adoption of Thrive, communities should follow the specific guidance
contained in this System Statement.
Thrive identifies Centerville with the community designation of Emerging Suburban Edge (Figure 1).
Emerging Suburban Edge communities include cities, townships and portions of both that are in the
early stages of transitioning into urbanized levels of development. Emerging Suburban Edge
commlunities are expected to plan for forecasted population at household growth at average densities
of at least 3-5 units per acre for new development and redevelopment. In addition, Emerging Suburban
Edge communities are expected to target opportunities for more intensive development near regional
transit investments at densities and in a manner articulated in the 2040 Transportation Policy Plan.
Speck strategies for Emerging Suburban Edge communities can be found on Centerville's Community
Page in the Local Planning Handbook
Page-3 ; 2015 SYSTEM STATEMENT—CENTERVILLE INTRODUCTION
Forecasts
The Council uses the forecasts developed as part of Thrive to plan for regional systems. Communities
should base their planning work on these forecasts. Given the nature of long-range forecasts and the
planning timeline undertaken by most communities, the Council will maintain on-going dialogue with
communities to consider any changes in growth trends or community expectations about growth that
may have an impact on regional systems.
The Thrive forecasts for population, households, and employment for your community are-
2010 (actual) 2014(est.) 2020 2030 20_40
Population 3,792 3,931 3,840 3,930 _ 4,060
Households 1,315 1,330 1,400 1,450 1,500
Employment 409 530 540 560 590
Housing Policy
The Council adopted the Housing Policy Plan on December 10, 2014, and amended the plan on July 8,
2015. The purpose of the plan is to provide leadership and guidance on regional housing needs and
challenges and to support Thrive MSP 2040. The Housing Policy Plan provides an integrated policy
framework to address housing challenges greater than any one city or county can tackle alone.
Consistent with state statute (Minn. Stat. 473.859, subd. 2(c) and subd. 4), communities must include a
housing element and implementation program in their local comprehensive plans that address existing
and projected housing needs.
The Council has also determined the regional need for low and moderate income housing for the
decade of 2021-2030 (see Part III and Appendix B in the Housing Policy Plan).
Centerville's share of the region's need for low and moderate income housing is 14 new units
affordable to households earning 80% of area median income (AMI)or below. Of these new units, the
need is for 9 affordable to households earning at or below 30% of AMI, 4 affordable to households
earning 31% to 50% of AMI, and 1 affordable to households earning 51%to 80% of AMI.
Affordable Housing Need Allocation for Centerville
At or below 30%AMI - - 9
31 to 50%AMI 4
51 to 80%AMI '
I otal Units 14
Specific requirements for the housing element and housing implementation programs of local
comprehensive plans can be found in the Local Planning Handbook.
Page-4 1 K15 SYSTEM.STHTEMENI -GENTtRVILLE INTRODUCTION
Figure 1.Centerville Community Designation
t Columbus
Han1 Lake; l <to
I
E
s
�i8i11e �
1 I
r �
i Centerville
Hugo
t
Lino i
I Lakes
i
I
Circle
Pines , --•
Shoreview �j RdrTh White -.
— Oaks ! Bear Twp.
White-Bear Lake
Extent c'k1mr,rasp
I
=.ri:•ti
Community Designations
f�•• ti '• 004:2e Council planning authority Emerging SLCurCen Edge
Agricultural Suburban Edge
l� (}' Rural Residential Suburban
Diversified Rural urban
f es:?'_ Rural Center Urcan Cemer
County Boundaries
=--==-----=•-i = r--- %_ Cky and Township Soiargarlas
Lakes and Major Rivers
Page-5 2015 SYSTEM STATEMENT—CENTERVILLE INTRODUCTION
TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM
STATEMENT
City of Centerville
The 2040 Transportation Policy Plan (TPP) Is the metropolitan system plan for highways, transit, and
aviation to which local comprehensive pians must conform. This system statement summarizes
significant changes to these three systems, as well as other changes made to the Transportation Policy
Plan since the last 2030 TPP was adopted in 2010, and highlights those elements of the system plan
that apply specifically to your community. The TPP incorporates the policy direction and the new 2040
socio economic forecasts adopted by the Metropolitan Council in the Thrive MSP 2040, and extends
the planning horizon from 2030 to 2040.
Federal Requirements
The TPP must respond to requirements outlined in state statute, as well as federal law, such as some
new requirements included in the federal law known as the Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21$'
Century Act (MAP-21). For instance, metropolitan transportation plans must now be performance
based, so the TPP now includes goals, objectives, and strategies outlined in chapter 2. In previous
versions of the TPP the strategies were known as policies; while some are new, the wording of many
strategies are similar to the wording of policies in previous plans. Performance measurements for this
plan are also discussed in Chapter 12, Federal Requirements.
Federal law requires the long range plan to identify regionally significant transportation investments
expected to be made over the next two decades, and to demonstrate that these planned investments
can be afforded under the plan's financial assumptions. Both costs and available revenues have
changed since the last plan was adopted in 2010, resulting in many changes in the plan. Federal law
does allow the plan to provide a vision for how an increased level of transportation revenue might be
spent if more resources become available, but the programs or projects identified in this scenario are
not considered part of the approved plan.
The TPP includes two funding scenarios for the metropolitan highway and transit systems: the "Current
Revenue Scenario" and the "Increased Revenue Scenario."
• The Current Revenue Scenario represents the fiscally constrained regional transportation
plan, which assumes revenues that the region can reasonably expect to be available based on
past experience and current laws and allocation formulas.
• The Increased Revenue Scenario represents an illustration of what be achieved with a
reasonable increase in revenues for transportation.
Under the Metropolitan Land Planning Act, local comprehensive plans are expected to conform to the
Current Revenue Scenario, which is the official metropolitan system plan. Potential improvements in
the Increased Revenue Scenario can be identified separately in local plans as unfunded proposals A
more detailed description of how to handle the various improvements in this category is included under
Other Plan Considerations.
In addition to reviewing this system statement, your community should consult the entire 2040
Transportation Policy Plan to ensure that your community's local comprehensive plan and plan
amendments conform to the metropolitan transportation system plan. Chapter 3, Land Use and Local
Planning, has been expanded and all communities should carefully review this chapter. A PDF file of
Page-6 1 201:�;Y ;"l Ekr 11 IA7 E ME"N' - GEN-i E RV�l!E TRANSPORTATION
the entire 2040 Transportation Policy Plan can be found at the Metropolitan Council's
website: http://www.metrocouncil.om TransportatiorVPianning72IKey-Transportation-Plannina-
Documents/Transportation-Policy-Plan-(9)1The-Adopted-2040-TPP-(1).aspx. The format of the plan is
slightly different than past Transportation Policy Plans. An introductory Overview, Chapter 1: Existing
System and Chapter 10: Equity and Environmental Justice have been added to this version of the TPP
in addition to the changes noted in the first paragraph. Please note some modifications have been
made to the appendices as well.
Key Changes in the 2040 Transportation Policy Plan
Adopted by the Metropolitan Council in January 2015, the revised 2040 Transportation Policy Plan
incorporates the following changes:
Metropolitan Highway System - Chapter 5
The Metropolitan Highway System is made up of principal arterials, shown In Fig 1-1 of the IPP and
also attached to this system statement. Although no new highways have been added to this system in
the 2040 TPP, the last incomplete segment of this system, TH 610, is now under construction in Maple
Grove.
• The TPP acknowledges that congestion cannot be eliminated or greatly reduced. The region's
mobility efforts will need to focus on managing congestion and working to provide alternatives.
The majority of resources available between now and 2040 will be needed for preservation,
management and operation of the existing highway system.
• Due to increased costs and decreased revenue expectations, many long-planned major projects
to add general purpose highway lanes are not in this fiscally constrained plan. While the
preservation, safety, and mobility needs of these corridors are recognized, investments in these
corridors will be focused on implementing traffic management strategies, lower cost-high benefit
spot mobility improvements, and implementing MnPASS lanes. Some specific projects have
been identified in this plan, but funding has primarily been allocated into various investment
categories rather than specific projects. The highway projects specifically identified in the
Current Revenue Scenario are shown in Figure 5-8 of the TPP which is also attached to this
system statement.
• Modifications were made to Appendix D- Functional Classification Criteria, and Appendix F—
Highway Interchange Requests. Appendix C—Project List is new and contains all of the transit
and highway projects that have been identified between 2014 and 2023.
Transit System Chapter 6
The transit system plan provides an overview of the basic components of transit planning, including
demographic factors, transit route and network design factors and urban design factors that support
transit usage. Local governments have the primary responsibility for planning transit-supportive land
use, through their comprehensive planning, and subdivision and zoning ordinances.
• The TPP includes updated Transit Market Areas (shown in TPP Figure 6-3, also attached) which
reflect 2010 Census information and an updated methodology that better aligns types and levels of
transit service to expected demand. These market areas identify the types of transit services that
are provided within each area.
• The TPP includes limited capital funding for transit expansion and modernization. Opportunities
primarily exist through competitive grant programs such as the regional solicitation for US DOT
Page-7 2015 SYST EM STATEMENT—CENTERVIL t E TRANSPORTATION
funding. These opportunities are guided by the strategies in the TPP and the various elements of
the Transit Investment Plan.
• The TPP includes an updated transitway system plan that more clearly articulates which projects
can be funded within reasonable revenue expectations through year 2040 (Current Revenue
Scenario as shown in TPP Figure 6-8, which is also attached). The plan includes five new or
expanded METRO lines, three new arterial bus rapid transit lines, and three corridors under study
for mode and alignment but identified in the Counties Transit Improvement Board's (CTIB) Phase I
Program of Projects. This system was developed in collaboration with CTIB, a major partner in
regional transitway expansion.
• The TPP does not include operating funding for transit service expansion beyond the existing
network of regular route bus, general public dial-a-ride, and Metro Vanpool.
• The Increased Revenue Scenario (shown TPP Figure 6-9, which is also attached) illustrates the
level of expansion for the bus and support system and transitway system that might be reasonable
if additional revenues were made available to accelerate construction of the transitway vision for the
region.
• The plan includes updated requirements and considerations for land use planning around the
region's transit system, This includes new residential density standards for areas near major
regional transit investments and an increased emphasis on proactive land use planning in
coordination with the planning of the transit system.
Aviation System - Chapter 9
The Metropolitan Aviation System Is comprised of nine airports (shown in Figure 1-9 of the TPP and
also attached to this system statement) and off-airport navigational aids. There are no new airports or
navigational aids that have been added to the system in the 2040 TPP.
• The TPP discusses the regional airport classification system as well as providing an overview of
roles and responsibilities in aviation for our regional and national partners. The investment plan in
includes an overview of funding sources for projects, and an overview of projects proposed for the
local airports that will maintain and enhance the regional airport system.
• Modifications were made to Appendix I—Regional Airspace, Appendix J— Metropolitan Airports
Commission Capital Investment Review Process, Appendix K—Airport Long Term Comprehensive
Plans and Appendix L—Aviation Land Use Compatibility.
Other Plan Changes
Regional Bicycle Transportation Network - Chapter 7
The 2040 TPP encourages the use of bicycles as a mode of transportation. To that end, the TPP
establishes for the first time a Regional Bicycle Transportation Network (RBTN). The goal of the RBTN
is to establish an integrated seamless network of on-street bikeways and off-road trails that
complement each other to most effectively improve conditions for bicycle transportation at the regional
level. Cities, counties, and parks agencies are encouraged to plan for and implement future bikeways
within and along these designated corridors and alignments to support the RBTN vision.
Page-8 201E SYSTEMS IAlEMEN1 --CENTERVit-LE TRANSPORTATION
Freight - Chapter 8
Most aspects of freight movement are controlled by the private sector, so unlike other sections of the
TPP, there is not a specific plan adopted for future public sector investment in freight facilities.
However, the discussion of the need for a safe and efficient multimodal freight system has been
updated and expanded in the TPP to recognize challenges and opportunities for freight movement as
well as the future direction of freight by mode. It acknowledges the closure of the Minneapolis Upper
Harbor in 2018, leaving St Paul and Shakopee as the region's major barge terminal areas in the future.
The plan also acknowledges the increase of trains since 2010 carrying oil from North Dakota on BNSF
and CP rail tracks, which is expected to continue into the future. Although railroad trackage in the
region was significantly decreased over the last 20 years to "right size" the system after federal
deregulation, communities should not expect much additional rail abandonment. Many tracks that
appear to be seldom used are owned by the smaller Class III railroads that serve local businesses by
providing direct rail connections from manufacturing and warehousing/distribution facilities to the major
national railroads. The major Class I railroads are approaching capacity and actually adding tracks in
some locations.
System Plan Considerations Affecting Your Community
Centerville should consult the complete 2040 Transportation Policy Plan in preparing its local
comprehensive plan. In addition, Centerville should consult Thrive MSP 2040 and the current version of
the Metropolitan Council's Local Planning Handbook for specific information needed in its
comprehensive plan. Specific system plan considerations affecting Centerville are detailed below.
Metropolitan Highways
There are no principal arterials located within Centerville.
Transit System
Centerville includes the following Transit Market Areas:
-
t e,� . ;c�r ;:�!��'-:d' ♦.�k^.c,r_�,,�¢d,„�•p"�•+ ,} ,�l `t " ;�'# •1 .��`,4r�`_.7Y's.�i+��'an`� :Kr ��=��� ,
z - _ �, .+5•"''r, .++r'' :fir a','.,,w+'^.41:'.+k:'� _ �' :�Y y ', x` 'y"s.�.� ���"� F':�e
"-.-�.x`�''�.'4e.,``:a2-Jµ F :H °'k,..'-.•...S 3.R"i4 :.der. �� .'."a'� fTi.3c_::�i��. fib.:4..
Market Area IV Transit Market Area IV has lower concentrations of population and employment
and a higher rate of auto ownership. It is primarily composed of Suburban Edge
and Emerging Suburban Edge communities. This market can support peak-period
express bus services if a sufficient concentration of commuters likely to use
transit service is located along a corridor. The low-density development and
suburban form of development presents challenges to fixed-route transit. General
public dial-a-ride services are appropriate in Market Area IV.
Centerville should identify and map existing transit services and facilities in the local comprehensive
plan. Centerville should also work with transit providers serving their community to identify potential
future transit service options and facilities that are consistent with the TPP and the applicable Transit
Market Areas. Communities can find further maps and guidance for transit planning in the
Transportation section of the Local Planning Handbook
Transitways
Current Revenue Scenario Transitways
The TPP s Transit Investment Plan does not show any transitway investments planned for Centerville in
the Current Revenue Scenario (TPP Figure 6-8),
Page-9 2015 SYSTEM STATEMENT—CENTERVILLE TRANSPORTATION
Increased Revenue Scenario Transitways
The TPP Increased Revenue Scenario shows additional transitway corridors beyond the scope of the
plan's adopted and fiscally constrained Transit Investment Plan (the Current Revenue Scenario). These
corridors are listed on page 6.63 of the TPP, and TPP Figure 6-9, which is attached, shows the
complete transitway vision for the region.
If Centerville believes it might be directly impacted by transitways in the Increased Revenue Scenario
(for example, because they are participating in transitway corridor studies or feasibility analyses), the
transitways may be acknowledged in the Comprehensive Plan. These additional corridors are or will be
under study for mode and alignment recommendations, but they are not included in fiscally constrained
plan. However, they should be clearly identified as not funded within the currently expected resources
for transitways. The Council recognizes the important planning work that goes into a corridor prior to it
becoming part of the region's Transit Investment Plan, especially if increased revenues were to become
available.
Similar to Current Revenue Scenario Transitways, communities should identify known potential stations
along planned transitways and consider guiding land use policies, station area plans, and associated
zoning, infrastructure, and implementation tools that support future growth around transit stations.
These policies can also influence station siting in initial planning phases of transitway corridors and
influence the competitiveness of a transitway for funding. Communities can find further guidance for
station area planning in the Transportation section of the Local Planning Handbook and the Transit
Oriented Development Guide.
Aviation
All communities must include an aviation element in the transportation sections of their comprehensive
plans. The degree of aviation planning and development considerations that need to be included in the
comprehensive plan varies by community. Even those communities not impacted directly by an airport
have a responsibility to include airspace protection in their comprehensive plan. The protection element
should include potential hazards to air navigation including electronic interference.
Centerville is not in an influence area of a regional airport. Airspace protection should be included in
local codes/ordinances to control height of structures.
Other Plan Considerations
Regional Bicycle Transportation Network
TPP Figure 7-1 shows the RBi N as established for the first time in the 2040 TPP. The network consists
UI cl series UI�I IUI ILV_ U I ICI I and TIGr 4 'rvi i iuv'rS and aU UcUi�:atcu aiiyiiiiiciiiL (rvv cam). Ti 1a pr_. _
used to develop the RBTN, as well as the general principles and analysis factors used in its
development, can be found in the Bicycle and Pedestrian Chapter of the TPP.
The RBTN corridors and alignments make up the "trunk arterials' of the overall system of bikeways that
connect to regional employment and activity centers. These are not intended to be the only bicycle
facilities in the region, and local units should also consider planning for any additional bike facilities
desired by their communities. RBTN corridors are shown where more specific alignments within those
corridors have not yet been designated, so local governments are encouraged to use their
comprehensive planning process to identify suitable alignments within the RBTN corridors for future
incorporation into the TPP.
In addition, agencies should plan their local on and off-road bikeway networks to connect to the
designated Tier 1 and Tier 2 alignments, as well as any new network alignments within RBTN corridors
Page-10 1 2015 SYSTEM 51,47EME1`0 CEN.',ERVILLE TRANSPORTATION
to be proposed in local comprehensive plans. Bikeway projects that complete segments of, or connect
to, the RBTN are given priority for federal transportation funds through the Transportation Advisory
Board's biannual regional solicitation.
Figure 7-1 shows that your community currently has one or more RBTN corridors and alignments within
its jurisdiction. The Council encourages local governments to incorporate the RBTN map within their
local bicycle plan maps to show how the local and regional systems are planned to work together. An
on-line interactive RBTN map, which allows communities to view the RBTN links in their community at a
much more detailed scale than Figure 7-1, can be found in the Transportation section of the Local
Planning Handbook The handbook also includes best practices, references, and guidance for all local
bicycle planning.
A Minor System /Functional Classification
The TPP has always recognized the A minor arterial system as an important supplement to the regional
highway system, and the Transportation Advisory Board (TAB) continues to maintain the official
regional map of these roads. The 2040 TPP does include an updated functional classification map (Fig.
1-2 in Chapter 1) and a modified Appendix D-Functional Classification Criteria. Communities should
consult the Local Plan Handbook for more information on functional classification, how to reflect the A
minor arterial system in their plan, and how to request functional classification changes if necessary.
Freight
The Council encourages all local governments to plan for freight movement in their communities.
Trucks are the major mode of freight movement in the region and across the nation to distribute
consumer goods as well as move manufactured goods and commodities, and they operate in every
community.
Communities with special freight facilities shown on TPP Figure 8-1, Metropolitan Freight System,
(attached) should also include those additional modes and facilities in their local plan, and plan for
compatible adjacent land uses.
Page-111 2015 SYSTEM STATEMENT—CFNTFRVILi_E TRANSPORTATION
Figure 1-1 of the TPP
Principal Arterials
Principal Arterial-Existing
Principal Arterial-Under Construction
Reference Items
Lakes and Rhmrs
City Boundwy
V Courdy Boundary ■
MLISA2040
MPO Arbor 0 5 10 20 Iufilea Nov 2014
1 1 1 1 1 a I I I
2040 TRANSPORTATION POLICY PLAN METROPOLITAN COUNCIL
Figure 1-1
METROPOLITAN
0 D U N C i L
Page- 12 2015SYS1 ENO,STATEMENI - GENI ERVILLE TRANSPORTATION
Figure 1-2 of the TPP
Functional Class Roads
Reference Items
Lak"W4 Flimm 14
ke
Ddy Bourdwy
COWV B"Wary
PWdPW AftW Roads
MILI&A 2* r
WOArft 6
Vit '
.L
a 5 10 20 Wes Nov 2014
L V
Existing Planned Thrive Planning Areas
Principal Arterial Principal Arterial Urban Core&Urban&Suburban
A-MinorAugmentor A-minorAugmerftr Suburban Edge&
Emerging Suburban Edge
A-Minor Reliever A-Minor Reliever Rural Service Areas
A-Minor Expander A-Minor Expander MPO Area outside the
Seven County Area
A-Minor Connector A-minor Connector
0—\� Other Minor Arterial Other Minor Arterial
Page-13 2015 SYSTEM STATEMENT-GENTERVILLC TRANSPORTATION
Figure 5.8 of the TPP
identified Projects"in Highway Current Revenue Scenario
Sherburne
z �
Reference Kom
�.Pm,apnI,awrr HirMmp Anoka
IN,0"WTrU*mWmW5
h I
CnyBwndwy Wright r_.,((-h� —
'
2040 urbm SoMmAma
UPO Arm
'loot kdMded to rePmsent
►IdudesQ _U10 2040. Hennepin Ramsey
*thoWPrgeda
Ida~by May 2014.
Subject to change and `- V
amendment.
t
r � C
- 1 C
r• C_
- �! S
rryy
"a /�r
1 \�
N
j r Dake
to 'J
0 5 10 20 Miles {, Plov 2014
1
O 2015-2018 TIP Bridges ^lp Shaleglc Capacity 2019-2024 Pavement Projects
0 2019-2024 Bridges Roadside Infmatructure ,.t 2015-2018 Pavement l MnPass
/"%.0 Roadside Infrastructure/Safety 2015-2018 Pavement/Safety
2015-2018 TIP Pavement Tier 1 MnPAS8 Expansion
Page-14 U,t S)'STLM Slf,TLVEN 1 - CF-Nl ERVILLF TRANSPORTATION
Figure 6-3 of the TPP
Transit Market Areas
Sherburne
0 5 10 20 Miles Nov 2014
Market Area I Emerging Market Area I I I
Market Area 11 Market Area IV
Emerging Market Area 11 Market Area V
MarketArea III Freestanding Town Center
Page-15 2015 SYSTEM STATEMENT-CENTERVILLE TRANSPORTATION
Figure 64 of the TPP
Current Revenue Scenario Transitways
and CTIB Phase I Program of Projects
Qherburne
Anoka
Wright
Reference Items
'-N_0 PWw4W Ad.W MV%Mp
oowTnr*Ffwmw
LOU and Rtvam
City&-nfty
L!3 Y
2D40 Urban service A.
MPO Ana
4
0
Cn
CD
?
Carver
0 5 10 20 Miles Nov 2014
Northstar Una Red Una #04%4,.a Arterial BRT
0%,%#Blue Una Orange Line 0 CTIB Phase I Program of Projects under study
mode and alignment not yet specified
Green Una Gold Line Regional Multimodal Hub
Page-16 2015 SYS-i EM SiATEMEN1 -CENTERVILLE TRANSPORTATION
Figure 6-9 of the TPP
Increased Revenue Scenario Transitways
Building an Accelerated Transitway Vision
k'
Reference Remo
C-Wyft-,"W
mpok"
f rl'
400 2014
Northstar Line Accelerated
Arterial BRT
00"Nt.0 Blue Line
rreen Lane understudy
Transrtwvys under 3tudy Increased Revenue Scenario would
ONO mods and alignment also include at least 1%average
Red Line W yet specified annual bus expansion.
Orange Line Regional Multimodal Hub
Gdld Line
Page-17 1 2015 SYSTEM STATEMENT-CENTERVILLE TRANSPORTATION
Figure 7-1 of the TPP
Regional Bicycle Transportation Network Vision
Sherbuno�:
i r
Anoka
Reference Items
JL ii
PrMa"Ar"I Reds
Lofts and Rgvm
MY 8—dary
0
no Sw. Amu
A
Carver
Scot
Dakota
C 5 10 20 Wes Nov 2014
R13TN Alignments Regional destinations Other Trall!Systems
0"114,0 Tier I Alignments 0 Metropolitan Job Centers Regional Trails
00%�Tier 2 AJIgnments 0 Regional Job Centers (Regional Parks Policy Plan)
Mississippi River Trail
0 Subregionall Job Centers (US Route 45)
RSTN Corridors(Alignments Undefined) A Large,High Schools State Trails(DNR)
Tier 1 Priority Regional Bicycle A Colleges&Unilversitles
Transportation Corridor
Tier 2 Regional Bicycle Highly Visited Regional Parks
Transportation Corridors 0 Major Sport&Entertainment Centers
Page-18 20',5SYSTEM S7ATEMENI -CENlERVILLE TRANSPORTATION
Figure 8-1 of the TPP
Metropolitan Freight System
Sherburne
Reference Items
_l car ao:uxl �' .,: r-• .
2NO urbur aerial Aire l .}. .-�Y ��_, .1_;'� � ` ^--at•�• t' •+ �
JI
} .�
wry• ,.,,.,_� �'r� L y.5�`��.r/'-'-�j 'Y1 \ti. ��:t, t I
_ �:�� rt.t------._ •; [/ i ►.•,- ' �■ •may.;,•,:.,,Mov 2014
--.� _�—__� .:' err•..�' �- f+.• rs /t4 `"�. �•� .•\I,
SCoti
may f I +f.• ,M1.
0 5 10 20 Web
'1..Principal Arterial Highways
•i--t+-4 railroads(Functional and Abandoned) - y ■ �' ``
Freight Terminals ?� .■ ;
t Air/Truck , ■
■ Barge/Truck .
■ Rai!I Trudc st Pard Meat `� I
Page-19 2015 SYSTEM STATEMENT-CENTERVILLE TRANSPORTATION
Figure 9-1 of the TPP
Airport Service Areas
ISATl CISAGO
!SHERBURN"
POL,111%
WIR!
ANT
r
. .OIL
S
-T If
H N EP I'M 'NtiiIRC FAQ MSEYJ
01
■
L
Uj IF-M
v.F
V,;0 M, V I E��Z
L4 j L,
52
SCID OTA
6TT
SI LEY
f 2f
4,III V,-— ---------- j ` ,
I-
LE SUEqR RICE
-A
0 5 10
Public Owned Pubk 1,11*9 Airport Privately Ownedirmsepcho Claws
Abport CompOloft Area Public Use Airport 0 m
Amp=bwndary
-NAR ZwLhg, pm""d semplIorn
,,.!�,P mms Inbadnak") we au"de 8=00M saw SWftmWAm
15 tars-LWXWk ffibm Law 0AW?Cft*AWQ*)
K"Tams) VOPL Wpkm SWOM Sm VOR Fmbcmm 2yxw
Map kifflempolls-,9L Ped WC 0"W PjW1 NIM Rho"
IdUrAh"IMPOn Tag IbmiwAram
(Wb4Chwnbwf49n FW4 *G& 69uIh6LNWAJrpon
Reff"J"Wo AVW1011 Facility
P=1 Domlam ArW Localled In Community
(FA AW4 MA Lake MmoA".t
Cormunily Dimilly
ANE Ando C=W-SkilneAlrW LYN Afflake Pkl=Tt Affected by Fmr:WjQ
&Moo Fm" FOR ForseLMOMport GenwelAirsince
FCM Fly*V Cloud AJqjM onfiRmtection
Page-20 20'5 SYS 1,W S f ATEMEN'l --G E N1 ERV L LL TRANSPORTATION
WATER RESOURCE REQUIREMENTS/
WASTEWATER SYSTEM STATEMENT
City of Centerville
The 2040 Water Resources Policy Plan includes policies and strategies to achieve the following goal:
To protect, conserve, and utilize the region's groundwater and surface water in ways that protect
public health, support economical growth and development, maintain habitat and ecosystem health,
and provide for recreational opportunities, which are essential to our region's quality of life.
The Policy Plan takes an integrated approach to water supply, water quality, and wastewater issues.
This approach moves beyond managing wastewater and stormwater only to meet regulatory
requirements by viewing wastewater and stormwater as resources,with the goal of protecting the
quantity and quality of water our region needs now and for future generations.
The Policy Plan includes policies and strategies to:
• Maximize regional benefits from regional investments in the areas of wastewater, water supply
and surface water.
Pursue reuse of wastewater and stormwater to offset demands on groundwater supplies.
• Promote greater collaboration, financial support, and technical support in working with partners
to address wastewater, water quality, water quantity and water supply issues.
Implement environmental stewardship in operating the regional wastewater system by reusing
wastewater, reducing energy use and air pollutant emissions, and reducing, reusing, and
recycling solid waste.
Key Concepts in the 2040 Water Resources Policy Plan
Adopted by the Metropolitan Council in May 2015, the 2040 Water Resources Policy Plan is the
metropolitan system plan for metropolitan wastewater services with which local comprehensive plans
must conform. The Policy Plan incorporates the following changes:
• Centers on and around an integrated approach to water supply, wastewater, and surface water
planning.
• Promotes the investigation of the issues and challenges in furthering our work in water conservation,
wastewater and stormwater reuse, and low impact deveiopivient pi aduc:;es In r rdec to prumute a
more sustainable region.
• Promotes the concept of sustainable water resources where, through collaboration and cooperation,
the region will take steps to manage its water resources in a sustainable way aimed at:
o Providing an adequate water supply for the region
o Promoting and implementing best management practices that protect the quality and quantity of
our resources
a Providing efficient and cost effective wastewater services to the region
o Efficiently addressing nonpoint and point sources pollution issues and solutions, and,
o Assessing and monitoring lakes, rivers, and streams so that we can adequately manage, protect,
and restore our valued resources.
o Continues the Council's position that communities that permit the construction and operation of
subsurface sewage treatment systems and other private wastewater treatment systems are
Page-21 2015 SYSTEM STATEMENT—CENTERVILLE WATER RESOURCES
responsible for ensuring that these systems are installed, maintained, managed and regulated
consistent with Minnesota Rules Chapter 7080-7083.
• Includes requirements in Appendix C for comprehensive sewer plans, local water plans, and local
water supply plans.
• Establishes inflow and infiltration goals for all communities served by the regional wastewater
system and requires all communities to include their inflow and infiltration mitigation programs in
their comprehensive sewer plan.
• Works with the State to attempt to (1) make funds available for inflow and infiltration mitigation, and
(2) promote statutes, rules, and regulations to encourage 111 mitigation.
Centerville should consult the complete Policy Plan in preparing its local comprehensive plan. In
addition, Centerville should consult Thrive MSP 2040 and the Local Planning Handbook for specific
information needed in its comprehensive plan.
System Plan Considerations Affecting Your Community
Metropolitan Sewer Service
Under state law (Minn. stat. 473.513) local governments are required to submit both a wastewater plan
element to their comprehensive plan as well as a comprehensive sewer plan describing service needs
from the Council. Specific requirements for the sewer element of your comprehensive plan can be
found in the Water Resources section of the Local Planning Handbook.
Forecasts
The forecasts of population, households, employment, and wastewater flows for Centerville as
contained in the adopted 2040 Water Resources Policy Plan can be found
at: http://www.metrocounc#.or4/Wastewater-Water/PlanningZ2040-Water-Resources-Policy-Plan aspx
and on your Community Page in the Local Planning Handbook. These forecasts are for sewered
development. The sewered housing forecasts were estimated using SAC data, annual city reports,
current trends, existing and future local wastewater service areas and other information relating to your
community. The wastewater flows are based on historical wastewater flow data, future projected
wastewater generation rates, and the projected sewered population and employment data.
The Council will use these growth and wastewater flow forecasts to plan future interceptor and
treatment works improvements needed to serve your community. The Council will not design future
interceptor improvements or treatment facilities to handle peak hourly flows in excess of the allowable
rate for your community. Centerville, through its comprehensive planning process, must decide the
location and staging of development, and then plan and design its local wastewater collection system to
serve this development. The Council will use its judgment as to where to assign growth within your
community to determine regional system capacity adequacy. If Centerville wishes to identify specific
areas within the community to concentrate its growth, it should do so within its Comprehensive Sewer
Plan.
You should also note that urban development at overall densities that are substantially lower than those
identified for your community in the Community Designation Section of this Systems Statement will also
be analyzed by the Council for their potential adverse effects on the cost of providing metropolitan
sewer service.
Description of the Metropolitan Disposal System Serving Your Community
Figure 1 shows the location of the Metropolitan Disposal System (MDS) serving your community.
Wastewater flow from Centerville is treated at the Metropolitan WWTP
Page-22 2015 SY'S f EBA S 1 ATLMEN f- CEN7 ERVILLE VVATER RESOURCES
Description of the Regional Inflow/Infiltration (I/1) Program
The 2040 Water Resources Policy Plan states tnat the Council will establish 111 goals for all
communities discharging wastewater to the MDS. Communities that have excessive 1/1 in their sanitary
sewer systems will be required to eliminate excessive 1/I. The Council will continue the implementation
of its on-going 1/1 reduction program. Communities identified through the program as needing to
eliminate excessive 1/1 will be required to submit a work plan that details work activities to identify and
eliminate sources of 1/1. The Council can limit increases in service within those communities having
excess 1/1 that do not demonstrate progress in reducing their excess 1/1. The Council will meet with the
community and discuss this alternative before it is implemented.
It is required that those communities that have been identified as contributors of excessive I/1, and that
have not already addressed private property sources, do so as part of their 1/1 program. Significant work
has been accomplished on the public infrastructure portion of the wastewater system. The Council will
pursue making funds available through the State for 1/1 mitigation, and promote statutes, rules and
regulations to encourage 1/1 mitigation.
Management of Subsurface Sewage Treatment Systems (SSTS) and Private
Systems
The Metropolitan Land Planning Act requires the sewer element of the local comprehensive plan to
describe the standards and conditions under which the installation of subsurface sewage treatment
systems and other private wastewater treatment systems will be permitted and to the extent
practicable, the areas not suitable for public or private systems.
The appropriate density for development with subsurface sewage treatment systems depends on the
suitability of the soils to treat wastewater and whether space is available for a primary and back up
drainfield. It is the Council's position that all municipalities and counties allowing subsurface sewage
treatment systems should incorporate current MPCA regulations (Minn. Rules Chapter 7080-7083) as
part of a program for managing subsurface sewage treatment systems in the sewer element of their
local comprehensive plan and implement the standards in issuing permits.
Centerville should adopt a management program consistent with state rules. An overview of
Centerville's management program must be included in the community's local comprehensive plan
update. If adequate information on the management program is not included; the comprehensive plan
will be found incomplete for review until the required information is provided to the Council. Specific
requirements for the local comprehensive plan can be found in the Local Planning Handbook
Small private treatment plants are located throughout the Metropolitan Area serving such developments
as individual industries, mobile home parks, and other urban type uses. The Council's position is that
such private wastewater treatment plants should be permitted only if they are in areas not programmed
for metropolitan sewer service in the future and they are provided for in a community's comprehensive
plan that the Council has approved. Furthermore, the community is responsible for permitting all
community or cluster wastewater treatment systems consistent with Minnesota Rules Chapter 7080-
7083 and MPCA standards. The Council will not provide financial support to assist communities if these
systems fail.
Centerville should include in the sewer element of its local comprehensive plan the conditions under
which private treatment plants or municipal treatments would be allowed, and include appropriate
management techniques sufficiently detailed to ensure that the facilities conform to permit conditions.
Centerville is responsible for ensuring that permit conditions for private treatment plants are met and
financial resources to manage these facilities are available.
Page-23 2015 SYSTEM STATEMENT—CFNTERVtt LE WATER RESOURCES
Surface Water Management
In 1995, Minnesota Statutes Section 473.859, subs. 2 was amencled to make the local water plan
(often referred to as local surface water management plans) required by section 103B. 235 a part of the
land use plan of the local comprehensive plan. Minnesota Rules Chapter 8410, updated in July of 2015,
includes the requirements for local water management plans. The main change that you need to be
aware of is that all communities in the metropolitan area must update their local water plan between
January 1, 2017 and December 31, 2018. This means that Centerville must update its local water plan
as part of the comprehensive plan update. The community's updated local water plan should be
submitted to the Council for its review concurrent with the review by the Watershed Management
Organization(s)within whose watershed(s) the community is located. Failure to have an updated
local water plan will result in the comprehensive plan being found incomplete for review until
the required plan is provided to the Council.
Local water plans must meet the requirements for local water plans in Minnesota Statutes, section
1036.235 and Minnesota Rules Chapter 8410. In general, local surface water plans need to include a
summary of the priorities and problems in the community; structural, nonstructural and programmatic
actions to take to address the priorities and problems; and clearly identified funding mechanisms to fix
the problems.
More detailed guidance for the local water pians can be found in Appendix C of the Council's 2040
Water Resources Policy Plan and in the Council's current Local Planning Handbook.
In addition, the Council has also updated its priority lake list that was first developed in the 1980s as
part of the Water Resources Policy Plan update. Figure 2 shows the priority lakes for Centerville. The
Council uses the priority lake list to focus its limited resources. The list is also used in the environmental
review process. Where a proposed development may impact a priority lake, the project proposer must
complete a nutrient budget analysis for the lake as part of the environmental review process.
Also included on Figure 2 is the watershed organization(s) that Centerville is part of and a list of
impaired waters in the community for use in development of your local water plans.
Other Plan Considerations
Water Supply
Local comprehensive plans also aaaress water supply (Minn. Stat., Sec. 473.859). For communities in
the metropolitan area with municipal water supply systems, this local comprehensive plan requirement
is met by completing the local water supply plan template, which was jointly developed by the
Metropolitan Council and the Minnesota Department of Natural Resource (DNR).
FOR COMMUNITIES WHO OWN/OPERATE A PUBLIC: WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM:
Because your community owns/operates a municipal community public water supply system (PWS),
the local water supply plan must be updated as part of the local comprehensive plan (Minn. Stat., Sec.
103G.291).
The updated local water supply plan should include information about your community along
with information about any neighboring communities served by your system.
You should update your local water supply plan upon notification by DNR. Local water supply plan due
dates will be staggered between January 1, 2017 and December 31, 2018. Your updated local water
supply plan should be submitted to the DNR. DNR will share the plan with the Council, and it will be
Page-24 12C`15 SYS FEMSIA-YEMENI - CENTERVIL.LE WATER RESOURCES
reviewed concurrently by both agencies. This schedule allows the local water supply plans to be
completed and included in the local comprehensive plan.
Failure to have an updated local water plan will result in the comprehensive plan being found
incomplete for review until the required plan is provided to the Council.
The water supply plan template fulfills multiple statutory obligations including:
• Minn. Stat., Sec. 103G.291 to complete a water supply plan including demand reduction
Minn. Stat., Sec. 473.859 to address water supply in local comprehensive plans
Minn. Administrative Rules 4720.5280 to address contingency planning for water supply
interruption
The plan must be officially adopted by your community, and if applicable the utility board, as part of the
local comprehensive plan.
At a minimum, the updated local water supply plan must use the joint DNR and Metropolitan Council
template and include water demand projections that are consistent with the community's population
forecast provided in the introductory section of this system statement. Potential water supply issues
should be acknowledged, monitoring and conservation programs should be developed, and
approaches to resolve any issues should be identified.
Guidance and information for water supply planning can be found in the Appendix C of the 2040 Water
Resources Policy Plan, the Local Planning Handbook, and the Council's Master Water Supply Plan.
The Council's Master Water Supply Plan provides communities in the region with planning assistance
for water supply in a way that:
3 Recognizes local control and responsibility for owning, maintaining and operating water systems
o Is developed in cooperation and consultation with municipal water suppliers, regional
stakeholders and state agencies
Protects critical habitat and water resources over the long term
® Meets regional needs for a reliable, secure water supply
o Highlights the benefits of integrated planning for stormwater, wastewater and water supply
Emphasizes and supports conservation and inter-jurisdictional cooperation
Provides clear guidance by identifying key challenges/issues/considerations in the region and
available approaches without dictating solutions
Figures 3-5 illustrate some water supply considerations that the community may consider as they
develop their local water supply plans, such as: aquifer water levels, groundwater and surface water
interactions, areas where aquifer tests or monitoring may be needed to reduce uncertainty, regulatory
and management areas, and emergency interconnections.
Page-25 2015 SYSTEM STATEMENT-CENTERVILLE WATER RESOURCES
Figure 1.MCES Sanitary Sewer Meter Service Areas
City of Centerville,Anoka County y
Rk
i
l'
1.
�t Centerville #WIG
L
6.61
t
+i
was
Teat
tE
f �
it mm
x+1
L qi
Irrt meWm by Type Outfall maters
— Gfal.* Low Head Cmeerng Lift Sbtiona
Foresmain BYpaes
.--- gipho MCESVAsl wmW Tmabnsnt Punts
IrtURpbw L&W ServluAreu
_— To Mekr V 100 Ave+.:F,1_:_•_i._
Areae of Urn** d Flow Em County Boundgnea Park ReoreaRonal or Preserve
ir/o the Comrnunlly C�CRY and TawrWNp Beundafise Goff Min
Ruta'Cenler WINfP
Service Areas Lakes and RNae
2940 MUSA NCompass Street Cenbrlirm
Page-25 20 i 5 SYSI EM S"ih1 EMENI-CENI ERVILLE WATER RESOURCES
Figure 2.Surface Water Resources
Centerville, Anoka County
Narrn �;�
CrnrorvlHe
Centerville
Lino Shvnr�r^
brands Lakes POEMr
4-
fW
-
ti%% rshed Mansgems t Otgan�za0art 3ouraa0es tmpeired Lake*t201a Oran WICA 303(11)List)
Watershed Management organization Type !mpstmd FL-vers 6 Streams:2014 Draft MPCA303(di List)
-COY �I_L> 2094 Priority Lakes
Watershed District
44Jatarst•.en i'A"g&ntent Organi2a5on County Boundaries
City and Township Boundaries
Other Lakes and Major Rlvere
-�--Other SYrearae
KiCcmpass Street Carteriirss
Page-27 1 2015 SYSTEM STATEMENT-CENTERVILLE WATER RESOURCES
Figure 3.Surface water features and interaction with the regional groundwater system,and state-protected surface water features
Centerville
i S a
Ilk. �
r ti N
• 11
Aftr
OVA
ML-
ell
.aaa -
Q9uaw
p �I
•
� y
Lrno takes 44k
�a 4
Lakes and:talar Myers
L sprfy(mR) Surface wafer type(reglanal screening by Rio Council)
• Mersow Fen(OMR) Obemneded from the rfgloetu gnuradwalw
;p fYst�n
i Recharg"aWA%M
Trout SV—(OIIR) M R.ad Ia g.W "
• Kant Ndun(OMt1 -Suppaitad by upwswng g-BaR lw
Page-28 2015 b'l"S Ela,£s i Al t_MENI --GENI EkV LLL WATER RESOURCES
Figure d.Availability of MN Department of Natural Resources groundwater level and MN Department of Health aquifer test data
Centerville
A
Centerville
Lino Lakes
os
Lakes ane)Major Ryas
Jrsrvatixt•.sei 1h*-."•o tnra 6n a rwa ma�im�m ve ues(DNR)
®ObswAtila:Wel shewing in upward grand In 2mug m varum values(DNR)
OOhauva W..ra]tlu."a rmaall mnlmwn values{,NR;
OOew4ftor 14x3%VAh IN iolew tdata to"Um a wend 11%www a wmm vale!P"
®AOWUM(MDF'
Page-29 12015 SYSTEM STATEMENT—CENTERVILLE WATER RESOURCES
Figure 5.Municipal public water supply system interconnections and regulatory management areas
Centerville
cenreNdre
Lino Lakes
U ns tbibrr
Lalaee and MaorRlvem
The wnmrnitys most reowrt loceiwow supply plan reports that the publcwetersupply system has no Interconnections
_The communkys most recent local wafer supply plan rapoirlB thatthe pubilcweter supplysystem hes one ormore InWoonnedions
®Spedd Well and Borlrq ComtructIon Area(MDH)
%//North and East Metro GrourAWar MartegemertAm(DMR)
Moderate to Hight'VWherebis Drinking lWer Supply ManegemertArea(MOH)
I_e—Dnnldrg vmor Suppy ManagemertArea for Mlmespolisa.Paul
Page-30 12016 SYSTEM STATEMENT -CEN1 ERVILLE WATER RESOURCES
REGIONAL PARKS SYSTEM
STATEMENT
City of Centerville
The Regional Parks System includes 62 regional parks, park reserves, and special recreation features,
plus more than 340 miles of regional trails that showcase the unique landscapes of the region and
provide year-round recreation. The Regional Parks System is well-loved by our region's residents and
attracted over 48 million annual visits in 2014.
The organizational structure of the Regional Parks System is unique, built upon a strong partnership
between the Council and the ten regional park implementing agencies that own and operate Regional
Parks System units. The regional park implementing agencies are:
Anoka County Ramsey County
City of Bloomington City of Saint Paul
Carver County Scott County
Dakota County Three Rivers Paris District
Minneapolis Park and Recreation Board Washington County
The 2040 Regional Parks Policy Plan was developed based on furthering the Thrive MSP 2040
outcomes of Stewardship, Prosperity, Equity, Livability, and Sustainability. Thrive MSP 2040 states that
the Council will collaborate with the Metropolitan Parks and Open Space Commission, the regional park
agencies, and state partners to:
• Expand the Regional Parks System to conserve, maintain, and connect natural resources
identified as being of high quality or having regional importance, as identified in the 2040
Regional Parks Policy Plan.
• Provide a comprehensive regional park and trail system that preserves high-quality natural
resources, increases climate resiliency, fosters healthy outcomes, connects communities, and
enhances quality of life in the region.
• Promote expanded multimodal access to regional parks, regional trails, and the transit network,
where appropriate.
• Strengthen equitable usage of regional parks and trails by all our region's residents; such as
across age, race, ethnicity, income, national origin, and ability.
Key Concepts in the 2040 Regional Parks Policy Plan
The 2040 Regional Parks Policy Plan includes the following policies, each with specific associated
strategies:
o Recreation Activities and Facilities Policy: Provide a regional system of recreation
opportunities for all residents, while maintaining the integrity of the natural resource base within
the Regional Parks System.
Page-31 2015 SYSTEM STATEMENT—CENTERVILLE REGIONAL PARKS
• Siting and Acquisition Policy: Identify lands with high-quality natural resources that are
desirable for Regional Parks System activities and put these lands in a protected status so they
will be available for recreational uses and conservation purposes in perpetuity.
• Planning Policy: Promote master planning and help provide integrated resource planning
across jurisdictions.
• Finance Policy: Provide adequate and equitable funding for the Regional Parks System units
and facilities in a manner that provides the greatest possible benefits to the people of the region.
• System Protection Policy: Protect public investment in acquisition and development by
assuring that every component in the system is able to fully carry out its designated role as long
as a need for it can be demonstrated
The 2040 Regional Parks Policy Plan is the metropolitan system plan for regional recreation open
space with which local comprehensive plans must conform. This system statement highlights the
elements of the system plan which apply specifically to your community. Find the complete text of the
2040 Regional Parks Policy Plan on the Council's website
2040 Regional Parks System Facilities
The Regional Partes System is comprised of four main types of facilities: regional parks, park reserves,
special recreation features and regional trails.
Regional Parks
Regional parks most notably contain a diversity of nature-based resources, either naturally occurring or
human-built, and are typically 200-500 acres in size. Regional parks accommodate a variety of passive
recreation activities.
Park Reserves
Park reserves, like regional parks, provide for a diversity of outdoor recreation activities. One major
feature that distinguishes a park reserve from a regional park is its size. The minimum size for a park
reserve is 1,000 acres. An additional characteristic of park reserves is that up to 20 percent of the park
reserve can be developed for recreational use, with at least 80 percent of the park reserve to be
managed as natural lands that protect the ecological functions of the native landscape.
rap. _ —r mUCr_-�.____-
J`.7�(.idl itC41CdLIV1I r+Cdll11C�
Special recreation features are defined as Regional Parks System opportunities not generally found in
the regional parks, park reserves or trail corridors. Special recreation features often require a unique
managing or programming effort.
Regional Trails
Regional trails are classified as 1) destination or greenway trails and 2) linking trails. Destination or
greenway trails typically follow along routes with high-quality natural resources that make the trail itself
a destination. Linking trails are predominately intended to provide connections between various
Regional Parks System facilities, most notably regional parks or park reserves.
Page-32 1 2015 SYSTEMS I/,I ENIEM -CENTERViLLE REGIONAL PARKS
2040 Regional Parks System Components
The 2040 Regional Parks Policy Plan identifies six components which together comprise the vision for
the Regional Parks System in 2040, as described below.
Existing Regional Parks System Facilities: include Regional Parks System Facilities that are
open for public use. These facilities include land that is owned by regional park implementing agencies,
and may include inholding parcels within the boundaries of these parks and trail corridors that have not
yet been acquired. Existing regional trails may include planned segments that will be developed in the
future.
Planned Regional Parks System Facilities (not yet open to the public): include Regional
Parks System Facilities that have a Council-approved master plan and may be in stages of acquisition
and development, but are not yet open for public use.
Regional Parks System Boundary Adjustments: include general areas identified as potential
additions to existing Regional Parks System Facilities to add recreational opportunities or protect
natural resources. Specific adjustments to park or trail corridor boundaries have not yet been planned.
Regional Park Search Areas: Include general areas for future regional parks to meet the
recreational needs of the region by 2040 where the regional park boundary has not yet been planned.
Regional Trail Search Corridors: include proposed regional trails to provide connections between
Regional Parks System facilities where the trail alignment has not yet been planned.
2040 Regional Trail Search Corridor System Additions: include regional trail search corridors
that were added to the Regional Parks System as part of the 2040 Regional Parks Policy Plan.
Key Changes in the 2040 Regional Parks Policy Plan
Adopted by the Metropolitan Council in February 2015, the 2040 Regional Parks Policy Plan
incorporates the following changes:
Identify all proposed regional trails as regional trail search corridors
i%li proposed regional tralls tial are not yet open to the public and do nct h ave a Metropolitan Council
approved master plan are represented as a general regional trail search corridor. The 2030 Regional
Parks Policy Plan depicted these trails with a proposed alignment. The alignment of these regional
trails will be determined in the future through a planning process led by the regional park implementing
agency. The alignment of these trails is subject to Metropolitan Council approval of a regional trail
master plan.
Acquire and develop ten new regional trails or trail extensions to meet the needs of the
region in 2040. The 2040 Regional Trail Search Corridor Additions include:
Carver County.
® County Road 61
Highway 41
Page-33 2015 SYSTEM STATEMENT—GENIERViLLE REGIONAL PARKS
Three Rivers Park District:
• CP Rail Extension
• Dakota Rail Extension
• Lake Independence Extension
• Lake Sarah Extension
• Minnetrista Extension
• North-South 1
• North-South 2
• West Mississippi River
The 2040 Regional Parks System Plan Map is depicted in Figure 1. Centerville should consult the
complete 2040 Regional Parks Policy Plan in preparing its local comprehensive plan. In addition,
Centerville should consult Thrive MSP 2040 and the current version of the Metropolitan Council's II ocz='
Planning Handbook for specific information needed in its comprehensive plan.
System Plan Considerations Affecting Your Community
Regional Parks System Components in your community
The following Regional Parks System Components within Centerville as identified in the 2040 Regional
Parks Policy Plan are listed below.
Regional Parks, Park Reserves, and Special Recreation Features
Rice Creek Chain of Lakes Park Reserve: This is an existing park reserve with an established
boundary. The park reserve boundary as shown in Figure 2 should be acknowledged in the
comprehensive plan.
Regional Trails
Bunker Hills-Chain of Lakes Regional Trail: This is a regional trail that includes segments that are
open to the public as well as planned segments that will be developed in the future. The regional trail
travels through Blaine and Lino Lakes as it connects Bunker Hills Regional Park, Rice Creek North
Regional Trail and Rice Creek Chain of Lakes Park Reserve. The regional trail alignment as shown in
Figure 2 should be acknowledged in the comprehensive plan.
Central Anoka Regional Trail: This is a regional trail that includes segments that are open to the
public as well as planned segments that will be developed in the future. The regional trail travels
thwuyii Ramsey, Andover, Ham Lake, Biaine, Lino Lakes, and Centerviiie as it connects Mississippi
West Regional Park, Rum River Regional Trail, Bunker Hills Regional Park, East Anoka County
Regional Trail and Rice Creek Chain of Lakes Park Reserve. The regional trail alignment as shown in
Figure 2 should be acknowledged in the comprehensive plan.
Chain of Lakes-Otter Lake Regional Trail Search Corridor: The regional trail search corridor travels
through Centerville and Lino Lakes as it connects Rice Creek Chain of Lakes Park Reserve and Bald
Eagle-Otter Lake Regional Park in White Bear Township. A master plan identifying the alignment of the
Chain of Lakes-Otter Lake Regional Trail has been approved since adoption of the 2040 Regional
Parks Policy Plan. The alignment of the regional trail should be acknowledged in the local
comprehensive plan. Anoka County will lead a planning process in the future to determine the
alignment of the regional trail. When preparing its comprehensive Alan, Centerville should verify
whether a master plan has been approved by the Metropolitan Council. If a master plan has been
Page-34 1 2015 SYSI EM STA1 EM-ENI - CENTERVILLE REGIONAL PARKS
approved, the punned regional trau alignment should be acknowledged in the comprehensive plan.
Otherwise, the general search corridor as shown in Figure 2 should be acknowledged in the
comprehensive plan.
Please contact Anoka County for more information regarding Regional Parks System Components in
Centerville.
Page-35 1 2015 SYSTEM STATEMENT—CENTLRVILLE REGIONAL PARKS
Figure 9.2040 Regional Parks System Plan Map
Regional Parks System
Twin Cities Metropolitan Area
�' • =rw - '�`.c..°a: -.. . �� �f' ._'�'"` ,mak*i .�
• _�. ":,'�'' ���}ryt G_ - ---<� 4 i � k t...:r.- ej:<'F 6y'•r. :r •`cz�l"=`.fps
. jt4' County
;..-..,...
7 t t J it yMl TR. � ._� �.� y1y, fi — - —;•}�, ---'—�
../
r..ga-ave_«.�,-.. ... 1^v.'-`z'..— ,1�..'-�i:A _ ..y...�'�'` _..r��.,s i Zq��T��. , •� ; - .r.
",°j�" - � �r��'�';;'-" �3':�•"- - i ';`fit'`; `� K= - 1 �...� I ',�'�
`,y �," ti � ,•"."�y�"• , - l # ti's+•�'
'^r &•�' > la�.��; .-�
,'� ! Carver- {.�.. °�� e • ..�� .'��%����(I ,
^
JI
+I-----�'— 3j , • `R� �•{ter Y r:}
` �,`•a { •� r-1 ` �'t�+f'�1 Vis- _
• ry d ro #a 20
M
�111N
Regional Perks Regional Park Search Areas and ExWng Stab Taft
IN Regionsi Parks Regional Trail Search Corridors Lakes and Major Rivers
Park Reserves roBoundary Adjusbrients, Mirmseots Valley National%VJWb ReFige
Special Reorvelon Features atate Parks
Planned LWts Search Amos Stall VladrA+Man mentArees
Regional Trar Condor Land {Pubgdy AooraeWle)
Regions)Trails R•gbnel Trail Search Corridors Sdantllic end Natural Areas(SNA)
-ExisBng Other Parks and Preserves
Planned Rational Trmk-2040 3"bmAddWons
Page-36 1 2015 SY.-.TEM STAJ DALN i -GENTERViLLE REGIONAL PARKS
Figure 2.Regional Parks System Facilities in and adjacent to Centerville
Regional.Parks System
City of Centerville, Anoka County
7
- +may♦f �':` .sYf;.7Y"a:'�,;'; t`� Ii
• : '•,�'-.'i ,_.� til. t°'�w t.m`,S.ii,,.
45_1
Regional Parks Regional Park Search Areas and a tuft save Trans
r ;2,eg c-rd Per-ca Regional Trail Search Corridors Sr*el Ceczantnes tNcontaattt
Pati,Reae Ra Bw"43
:y Aips:ntrte :acs*&M t.�ltic.Rtvwa
Spacial Recro0on Features ld rr esota Wle al9t:or:ei:+dldl6e Rat!ge
& Planned Un-ft Srs sn Areas ii Slate Parks
Regtor+ai Trad Parc::La11J IM State VlAidllfa t 1004kpMentAreaa
Regional Trails Regional Trail Search Corridors (PubNdy AcceseN e)
^��ct 9Ung Sdenthc enc dAt.:rai Areas.SNAS
w,ua:zpa..nad :;WgW,*f T'Ne-2=Sp*ta:t:-.4U>r
• ., , Other Parkaand Pmservea
Page-37 1 2015 SYSTEM STATEMENT--CENTERVILLE REGIONAL PARKS
AGENDA
2016 CENTERVILLE FETE DES LACS FESTIVAL COMMITTEE
MONDAY, JANUARY 25, 2016 - 6:30 PM
Centerville City Hall
6:30 pm 1. Welcome and Introductions—Mike Ericson
6:40 pm 2. Review Charge from Centerville Lions and Businesses
"Fun Family Event That Builds Community"
"Beach Party Theme"
• Recap of December 21, 2015 meeting
• Telecon with Gold Star Carnival/Circus
• Parks and Recreation Action Item—Kerri Kolstad
7:05 pm 3. 2016 Committees
• Publicity—Flyer in windows of businesses
• Food—Lions
• Music—Tom Lee
• Volunteers—Lions and Park & Recreation
• Sponsors—Mike and Kerri
• Parade—Jeff and Ben
• All Star Softball Game—Todd Steffen
• Security - CLPD
• 5K& SK Run Race Director—Kerri Kolstad
• Thank You's-
• Fireworks—City/Lions
• Bingo - Lions
7:15 pm 4. Community/Student Volunteers
• Centennial High NHS,ROTC, Student Council
• Centerville Elementary PTA Committee Council
• Main Street Business Association
• Parks and Recreation Commission
• Boy Scouts and Girls Scouts
• St. Gen's Catholic Church
• St. John's The Baptist Catholic Church
• Anoka County Radio Club
7:20 pm 5. Discussion on Major Sponsors:
Petting Zoo ($500)- Inflatables ($575)
7:25 pm 6. Schedule Next Meeting
7:30 pm 7. Adjournment
��
_ - _ - _ _ � - _f�-
•- s �
.•, ,���' _ _ _ 1 .
,.r � � .+ I ' � r
1I „ t.., y ,�:
� f r '„ _
�� .-,.,, a .�� � `� _
,a .�_
,�. .
,_.y; i � .
�� � � 4 � � * �� y L
,_ �,�'
h 1 'yI
u�.
�� � �� �:• �r y
�;:
-#f z ;,�1� ♦u'
x a�
_ F
r �
PENN
.a Mal,
p
u
Boz! I aeyr asap { �
:r
� L'1�'�t?1'�Jlt�•
CITY OF CENTERVILLE
APPLICATION FOR APPOINTMENT
t �
Committee or Commission applying for: h n ( h '
� � i
NAME: t ✓�l�t S O l , lee-
STREET � h Oti/'UL
ADDRESS: - 3 /�eGtd p w �`
CITY: C �'` �� f V , l l L , MN ZIP CODE: -5: , y 3 ?
HOME TELEPHONE: �r ���'� 4 AVORK TELEPHONE:
FAX: EMAIL ADDRESS: k �' '
o rna
Number of years a Centerville Resident?: / 5-
Are you presently serving on a Centerville Committee or Commission?: F"k 9i- pe ; Vt 5
Which One?: r GZ r K 4 Term?: j
Have you served on a Centerville Committee or Commission in the past?: bo J� i
Which One?: Term?:
Which One?: Term?:
What do you have to offer the Cqv of Centerville as a Committee or Comrpission
member?: re i vc -( r<
�� near o C) S yet
�n errK S `�
I iA vw\a4+C'rj oF O10 V'4" kAo 6"/ 1-ec`✓"A
Experience or Education that would enhance your effectiveness as a Committee or
Commission member?:
,7�r- Cr-r 0
+1 i vn t tU r,e S ec-,r I. 8 rL ),jA ot-fft r ,
Signature: OK141, Date: J 0,
Return to: City Administrator
City of Centerville
1880 Main Street
Centerville, MN 55038
:�.U_.� R.
CITY OF CENTERVILLE
� �r�Ce APPLICATION FOR APPOINTMENT
Committee or Commission applying for:
Planning and Zoning
NAME:
Peter J. Johnson
STREET ADDRESS: 6991 Meadow Circle
Centerville 55038
CITY: , MN ZIP CODE:
HOME TELEPHONE: 651-493-8490 WORK TELEPHONE: 651-587-2270
FAX: EMAIL ADDRESS: petejohnson5150@comcast.nc
Number of years a Centerville Resident?: 8
Are you presently serving on a Centerville Committee or Commission?: No
Which One?: Term?:
Have you served on a Centerville Committee or Commission in the past?: No
Which One?: Term?:
Which One?: Term?:
What do you have to offer the City of Centerville as a Committee or Commission
member?: My family has lived in Centerville for over eight years, we have enjoyed
raising our four children here in Centerville. I have a passion for our city and would like
to be involved by contributing to its future in a meaningful way. I believe the experiences
and passion I would bring to this position would benefit the P&Z Commission and the Cit
Experience or Education that would enhance your effectiveness as a Committee or
Commission member?: I have several years of successful experience working in committ
setting,most recently as church Council member, Council Vice-President,and Council
President at St. Stephen's church in WBL. As an EMT instructor, I spend many hours
every month providing EMT instruction in a large group setting. I am also a member of C
DIgIW1 d8„Od by Pete Jdwm
DN rn Pele Jah—,-P.M Jd—.,—Se.
Pete Johnson emal pe epMeaS,'0�m nraeL et c=OsJanuary 26,2016
Signature: DMO 2016 0,26 15 53 37-WOO' Date:
Return to: City Administrator
City of Centerville
1880 Main Street
Centerville, MN 55038
CITY OF CENTERVILLE
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, the Planning and Zoning Commission held its regular
meeting on Tuesday, January 5, 2016 at 6:30 p.m.
PRESENT: Chairperson Darrin Mosher
Commissioner Russ Koski
Commissioner Matthew Montain
Commissioner Mark Haiden
Commissioner Nick Twohy
ABSENT: None
STAFF: City Administrator Mike Ericson
OTHERS PRESENT: Council Member D. Love
1. CALL TO ORDER. The meeting was called to order at 6:30 p.m. by Chairperson
Mosher.
1. Roll Call
H. APPEARANCES
1. None.
III. PUBLIC HEARING(S)
1. None.
IV. OLD BUSINESS
1. Proposed Parking Design—Centennial School District#12 (Centerville Elementary)
Administrator Ericson gave a brief update of meetings with two members of the School Board
(Chair & Vice Chair), Mayor Wilharber, Council Member Fehrenbacher, Business Manager Dan
Hoffinan & Superintendent Dietz where the school shared their vision for enlargement of the
parking lot for student/staff safety. The City shared their vision of the Downtown Redevelopment
Plan and the need for parking in the downtown area for (festival, farmer's market, public events,
etc.).
The Commission had lengthy discussion on the proposed parking design and the City's Downtown
Master Plan.
Page 1 of 2
City of Centerville
Planning and Zoning Commission
January 5,2016
a. 1709 Main Street—Condemnation Proceedings
Administrator Ericson stated that the School District has commenced eminent domain proceedings
to acquire the property. The Commission had a discussion on whether the City should participate
in the purchase of the property as a partner with ISD #12.
2. MN DNR Water Supply Planning& Conservation Meeting on November 24, 2015
Administrator Ericson gave a brief overview of the meeting stating this was the third meting
requested by the judge after the lawsuit was filed. Discussion by the Commission included water
supply plans and water conservation goals of a 17%reduction.
V. NEW BUSINESS
1. Discussion on Metropolitan Council System Statement
The Commission reviewed the statement and requested that the document be available in
Dropbox. The City Clerk completed this work. Administrator Ericson stated that the Commission
would be using the system statement as a guide for updating the City's Comprehensive Plan by
2018.
VI. DISCUSSION ITEMS
1. 2016 Fete des Lacs Festival Committee
Administrator Ericson gave a brief overview of the most recent meeting stating that another
meeting was scheduled for January 25, 2016. He stated that he would keep the Commission
updated on the Committee's work.
VII. CONSIDERATION OF MINUTES
1. December 1,2015 Planning& Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes
Motion by Commissioner Koski seconded by Commissioner Montain to approve minutes
from the December 1, 2015, meeting as presented. All in favor. Motion carried.
VIII. ADJOURNMENT
Motion by Commissioner Koski, seconded by Commissioner Mosher to adjourn the meeting
at 7:30 p.m. All in favor. Motion carried.
Respectfully submitted,
Michael A. Ericson
City Administrator
Page 2 of 2