The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2006-05-02 P & Z tervi{{e 'Esta6{isfieJ 1857 PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING AGENDA TUESDAY, MAY 2, 2006 6:30 p.m. I. CALL TO ORDER 1. Roll Call ll. APPEARANCESIPRESENTATION(S) m PUBLIC HEARING (S) 1. Rezone/Comprehensive Plan Amendment of Certain Parcels Within the Downtown Area 2. Proposed Ordinance #92 - ModifYing M-l District Requirements and Adding the M-2 District 3. Proposed Ordinance #93 - ModifYing Definitions and Changing Regulations Related to Accessory Structures IV. OLD BUSINESS v. NEW BUSINESS 1. Calling for a Public Hearing - Conditional Use Permit (Realign Clearwater Creek) (SRF - Anoka County CSAH 14 Project) 2. Mr. Steve Hulback, 1736 Center Street, Covered Porch Request (Ord: Amend.) VL DISCUSSION ITEMS VII. CONSIDERATION OF MINUTES 1. April 4, 2006 Planning and Zoning Meeting Minutes VDI. ADJOURNMENT " @~~;:;if.~ STATE OF l\IINNESOTA COUNTY OF ANOKA CITY OF CENTERVILLE NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ON THE PROPOSED REZONE AND ASSOCIATED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Al\IENDEl\fENTS NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, that the Planning and Zoning COlmnission of the City ofCenterville will be meeting to consider rezoning certain properties and corresponding comprehensive plan amendments as follows on Tuesday, May 2, 2006 in the Council Chambers of City Hall located at 1880 Main Street, Centerville, Minnesota commencing at 6:30 p.m. or shortly thereafter The areas proposed to be rezoned are as follows: 7029 C enterville Road from R-2 to M-l 7045 Centerville Road from R-2 to M-l 7046 Centerville Road from R-2 to M-l 7121 Centerville Road from R-2 to M-2 7124 Centerville Road from R-2 to M-I 7060 Goiffon Road from M-l to M-2 1680 Heritage Street from R-2 to M-2 1688 Heritage Street from R-2 to M-l 1688 Heritage Street from R-2 to M-2 1716 Heritage Street from R-2 to M-l 1721 Heritage Street trom M-l to M-2 1724 Heritage Street from R-2 to M-2 1740 Heritage Street from R-2 to M-2 1744 Heritage Street from R-2 to M-2 1745 Heritage Street from R-2 to M-2 1748 Heritage Street from R-2 to M-2 1749 Heritage Street from R-2 to M-2 1687 Main Street from R-2 to M-2 1691 Main Street fromR-2 toM-l 1695 Main Street from R-2 to M-l 1709 Main Street from R-2 to M-l 1737 Main Street from R-2 to M-l Lots 1-7, Block 4 Centerville from P-l to M-l 1741 Main Street from R-2 to M-l 1742 Main Street from R-2 to M-l 1744 Main Street from R-2 to M-l 1745 Main Street from R-2 to M-l 1751 Main Street from R-2 to M-l 7105 Main Street from R-2 to M-2 7111 Main Street from R-2 to M-2 7113 Main Street from R-2 to M-2 7121 Main Street from R-2 to M-2 7124 Main Street from R-2 to M-2 7129 Main Street from R-2 to M-2 7048 Progress Road from R-2 to M-2 7059 Progress Road from M-l to M-2 7072 Progress Road from R-2 to M-2 7082 Progress Road from R-2 to M-2 7088 Progress Road from R-2 to M-2 7098 Progress Road from R-2 to M-l 7124 Progress Road from R-2 to M-l 7128 Progress Road from R-2 to M-l 1680 Sorel Street from M-l to M-2 1688 Sorel Street from M-l to M-2 1724 Sorel Street from M-l to M-2 The City of Centelville City Hall is ADA accessible. Requests for hearing assistance devices or a sign language interpreter must be received before 4:00 p.m. April 28, 2006. You may contact the City Clerk's office at (651) 429-3232 or by facsimile (651) 429-8629 if you need additional information. If you desire, you may email: dlarson@centervillemn.com or tbender@centervillemn.com with questions or concerns. This notice is also available on the City's web site, View Public Documents, Legal Notices. April 11, 2006 Teresa Bender, City Clerk Published in the Quad Community Press on April 18 and April 25, 2006. 5 CE TERVl LE ELEMENTAR CHOOL -~t-l-- w 7 6 --1 -' a 5 5 0:- 9 4 W ~ 10 Z 3 W <..} 1 I 2 12 H~ - WP;- 6 '1 12 13 14 I I -Ht-I~ :1tj~ 4 10 9 B 7 4- .3 11 2 11 '2 13 14 12 ---seRE-l-- 7 6 B 5 10 9 B 7 9 4 10 :3 11 11 12 13, 14 2 2 ~2 N "":..-. ~~ 7 6 8 5 9 4- 10 J 11 2 12 1 7 6 -. -- r- - 7 6 5 4- 11 12 -~_._., 7 B 5 9 10 11 12 R2 -------{;; 1inTl ~~ I R2 I I /(2.. l:..8~:21::~ ST ATE OF IVIINNESOT A COUNTY OF ANOKA CITY OF CENTERVILLE NOTICE OF PUBLIC BEARING ON THE PROPOSED MODIFYING THE M-l DISTRICT REQUIREMENTS AND ADDING THE M-2 DISTRICT NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, that the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City ofCenterville will be meeting to consider the proposed ordinance modifying the M-l District requirements and adding the M-2 District on Tuesday, May 2, 2006 in the Council Chambers of City Hall located at 1880 Main Street, Centerville, Minnesota commencing at 6:30 p.m. or shortly thereafter. The ordinance modifies the regulations for the permitted uses and special requirements for the M-I District and establishes the M-2 District and its regulations. Regulations specifically require that any development comply with "Downtown Redevelopment Master Plan". The City of Centerville City Hall is ADA accessible. Requests for hearing assistance devices or a sign language interpreter l11ust be received before 4:00 p.m. April 28,2006 You may contact the City Clerk's office at (651) 429-3232 or by facsimile (651) 429-8629 if you need additional information. If you desire, you may email: dlarson@centervillemn.com or ili~1lc:l~r({i)ce111e_ryjl1ell1!L~Q!11 with questions or concerns. This notice and the proposed amendment are also available on the City's web site, View Public Documents, Legal Notices. Aprilll, 2006 Teresa Bender, City Clerk Published in the Quad Community Press on April 18 and April 25, 2006. CITY OF CENTERVILLE ANOK.\ COUNTY.l\UNNESOTA ORDINANCE #92 SECOND SERIES AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 154 OF THE CENTERVlLLE CITY CODE BY MODIFYING 1\1-1 DISTRICT REQUIREMENTS AND ADDING M-2 DISTRICT THE CITY OF CENTERVILLE ORDAINS Section 1. Code Section 154.090 shall be amended to read as follows: 154.090 MIXED USE DISTRICT (M-1). (A) Pl/11Jose. It is intended that the M-l District implement the "Master Plan and Development Guidelines for Downtown Centerville," adopted by the City Council on January 11, 2006 (the "Redevelopment Plan"), and provide for the unique layout and character of a traditional central business district with retail, professional office, accessory residential and other mixed uses (B) Permitted lIses. ( I) Retail sales conducted within structures, but excluding automobile and motorized equipment sales, truck stops, gasoline and fuel sales and drive-through restaurants; (2) Repair and service conducted within structures, but excluding automobile and motorized equipment repair; (3) Professional, business, and health care offices; (4) Residences above the first floor; (5) Theaters and recreational businesses conducted within structures; and (6) Public parks and buildings. (C) ,SjJecial require/1leJ1ts. The following special requirements are intended to implement the Redevelopment Plan, which is incorporated herein by reference (I) Existing uses that are not in conformance with this section may not be expanded, but may continue as nonconforming uses. These nonconforming uses may be repaired and maintained and are allowed minor improvements that do not expand the use. (2) In making decisions about land use compatibility and dimensional criteria for uses and structures, the City shall have broad discretion to protect the public health, safety and welfare: and to protect the integrity of the M-l District and surrounding residential neighborhoods. Redevelopment of any parcel shall be accomplished by submitting application as a Planned Unit Development. (3) Driveway access to any use shall not be permitted from Centerville Road or Main Street but rather planned side streets and alleys must be used for such access. (4) The Redevelopment Plan establishes a shared parking plan. Applicants for permits shall indicate how they will conform to the parking plan, including potential dedication of property for shared parking or public parking lots. The City shall have broad discretion in determining whether to accept ownership and maintenance of shared parking facilities. Maintenance of public parking and other public facilities may be accomplished through creation of a Downtown Service District and may include maintenance assessments or user fees. (5) The architectural design and exterior building materials used in connection with any new or expanded use or structure shall be consistent with any architectural design or aesthetic control requirements e~1ablished by the Redevelopment Plan. The City will engage the services of a consultant architect to assist with the review The cost of such services may be charged to the applicant. (6) Stormwater management will be accomplished through regional stormwater facilities. Construction of the stormwater facilities may be accomplished through coordinated private improvements and public improvements, and maintenance of the stormwater facilities may be accomplished through district-wide assessments and user fees. Individual stormwater improvements that are not part of the planned regional stormwater management facilities are not permitted in the M-l District. Section 2. A new Code Section 154 091 shall be inserted to read as follows: 154.090 MIXED USE NEIGHBORHOOD DISTRICT (M-2). (A) Purpose. It is intended that the M-2 District implement the "Master Plan and Development Guidelines for Downtown Centerville," adopted by the City Council on January 11,2006 (the "Redevelopment Plan"), and provide tor higher density residential uses and accessory retail and office uses to complement the adjoining M-l District and existing neighborhoods. (B) Permitted uses. (1) Residential uses with a density between 12 and 30 units per acre. (2) Ground level retail or offices up to 25% of a stmcture, provided that the use is on a corner lot. (3) Public parks and buildings. (C) Special requiremellts. The tollowing special requirements are intended to implement the Redevelopment Plan, which is incorporated herein by reference. (I) Existing uses that are not in conformance with this section may not be expanded, but may continue as nonconforming uses. These nonconforming uses may be repaired and maintained and are allowed minor improvements that do not expand the use. (2) In making decisions about land use compatibility and dimensional criteria for uses and structures, the City shall have broad discretion to protect the public health, safety and welfare; and to protect the integrity of the M-2 District, adjacent M-l District and surrounding residential neighborhoods. Redevelopment of any parcel shall be accomplished by submitting application as a Planned Unit Development. (3) Driveway access to any use shall not be permitted from Centerville Road or Main Street but rather planned side streets and alleys must be used for such access. (4) The architectural design and exterior building materials used in connection with any new or expanded use or structure shall be consistent with any architectural design or aesthetic control requirements established by the Redevelopment Plan. The city will engage the services of a consultant architect to assist with the review. The cost of such services may be charged to the applicant. (5) Stormwater management will be accomplished through regional stonnwater facilities Construction of the stormwater facilities may be accomplished through coordinated private improvements and public improvements, and maintenance of the stormwater facilities may be accomplished through district-wide assessments and user fees. Individual stormwater improvements that are not part of the planned regional stonnwater management facilities are not permitted in the M-2 District. Section 3. Effective Date. This ordinance shall be effective immediately upon its passage and publication according to law. ADOPTED this City ofCenterville. day of , 2006 by the City Council of the CITY OF CENTERVILLE BY 1\.fary Capra, Mayor ATTEST: Teresa Bender, City Clerk {1t,:?J:!(~ ST ATE OF l\IINNESOT A COUNTY OF ANOKA CITY OF CENTERVILLE NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ON THE PROPOSED ORDINANCE MODIFYING THE DEFINITIONS AND CHANGING REGULt\TIONS RELATED TO ACCESSORY STRUCTURES NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, that the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City ofCenterville will be meeting to consider the proposed ordinance modifying the definitions and changing regulations related to accessory structures on Tuesday, May 2, 2006 in the Council Chambers of City Hall located at 1880 Main Street, Centerville, Minnesota commencing at 6:30 pm or shortly thereafter The ordinance modifies the definition "Yard, Front"' and modifies the regulations for placement of accessory structures such as garages, sheds and the like. The City of Centerville City Hall is ADA accessible. Requests for hearing assistance devices or a sign language interpreter must be received before 4:00 pm. April 28, 2006. You may contact the City Clerk's office at (651) 429-3232 or by facsimile (651) 429-8629 if you need additional information. If you desire, you may email: dlarson@centervillemn.col11 or tb~J1d~~I"@~eJlteryill~lllil.~Qm with questions or concerns. This notice and the proposed amendment are also available on the City's web site, View Public Documents, Legal Notices. April II, 2006 Teresa Bender, City Clerk Published in the Quad Community Press on April 18 and April 25, 2006. CITY OF CENTERVILLE ANOK.\ COUNTY. MINNESOTA ORDINANCE #93 SECOND SERIES AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 154 OF mE CENTERVlLLE CITY CODE BY MODIFYING DEFINITIONS AND CHANGING REGULATIONS RELATED TO ACCESSORY STRUCTURES THE CITY OF CENTER\;1LLE ORDAINS: Section 1. Code Section 154006 Detinitions. The detinition of "Yard, Front" shall be amended to read as follows: YARD, FRONT. A yard extending across the full width of the front lot between the side lot lines and extending from the front property line to the depth required in the yard regulations of the district in which the lot is located. On a corner lot, both street frontages shall be considered the front. Section 2. Code Section 154.022 shall be amended to read as follows: ~ 154.022 ACCESSORY STRIJCTURES AND USES. ( 1) Accessory Structures-Residential U~es (A) No more than two accessory buildings are permitted on any single-family, detached dwelling parcel located in any district except R-l. Combined aggregate square footage for accessory structures shall not exceed 200 square feet or 2% of the lot area, whichever is greater. (B) In no event may the combined square footage of accessory buildings exceed the square footage of the main level of the principal stmcture, except in the R-l District. (C) No accessory structure may be constructed on a parcel without a principal stmcture (D) No accessory structure shall be erected or located ,yithin any required yard other than the rear yard. (E) Accessory stmctures must have a minimum of a 5-foot interior side setback and a 10- foot rear setback. Where a rear or side yard abuts a street, an accessory building shall be set back a minimum of 20 feet from the street property line. No structure may be placed in an easement except bridges by written permit approved by the City Council. (F) In case an accessory structure is attached to the main building, it shall be made structurally a part of the main building and shall comply in all respects with the requirements of this chapter applicable to the main building. ( G) An accessory building, unless attached to and made a part of the main building, shall not be closer than 6 feet to the main building, except as otherwise provided in this section. 1 (H) The total area of an attached accessOlY building (garage) shall be no greater than 1,500 square feet per level, but in no event may the garage space exceed the square footage of the main floor of the dwelling (I) Swimming pools may exceed the size requirements for accessory structures, but shall not exceed 50% of the rear yard. (J) The side walls of an accessory building shall not exceed 10 feet in height and the overall height of the structure shall not exceed fifteen feet, except to match the roof slope of the principal structure. This provision shall not apply to farm buildings located in a R-l district. (K) Arbors. trellises. balconies. breezeways. open porches. detached outdoor living roolUS. and heating equipment may be placed in a rear yard if it is at least fifteen feet from the rear lot line and five feet from a side lot line. but may not be closer to a side street property line than the principal structure. (L) Neither buildings with metal roofs and exterior walls and covering a total (exterior) area in excess of 120 square feet, nor any other buildings with metal roofs shall be permitted in any residential or mixed use districts. Pole-type buildings and rigid frame structures with membrane roof or sides, are also prohibited all zoning districts. (M) Buildings exceeding 120 square feet shall be anchored to a concrete floating slab foundation. (N) The exterior color and design of an accessory structure shall be similar to the principal structure. (2) Accessory .~'f/'1lct1/res. 11011-residel1tialuses. The following standards shall regulate the construction and maintenance of non-residential accessory structures: (A) All accessory structures shall be subject to the same setback, height and exterior finish regulations as a principal structure for the district in which it is located. (3) Permits. All accessory structures shall require a building or zoning permit from the city. Section 3. Code Section 154.060, Subd. G shall be amended to read as follows: (G) AccessOf)' Structures. Garages, accessory structures, screen walls, buildings and exposed areas of retaining walls shall be of similar type, quality and appearance as the principal structure. The height of an accessory structure shall not exceed the height of the principal structure. Section 4. Effective Date. This ordinance shall be effective immediately upon its passage and publication according to law. 2 PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED this Council ofthe City of Centerville. day of , 2006 by the City CITY OF CENTERVll..LE BY: Mary Capra, Mayor ATTEST: Teresa Bender, City Clerk 3 April 26, 2006 Memo to Planning and Zoning Commission From: Dallas Larson, City Administrator A local resident has requested that the City consider amending its rules to allow a covered porch to extend into the required front setback.. Other communities are split on this issue. I looked at about a dozen zoning ordinances from other cities and found about half are like Centerville and allow only uncovered entrances to encroach.. Some of those that do permit a covered porch allow walls, others allow a roof only. Some examples of those that allow this in some form are indicated below. The name of the city and an excerpt of their code language are indicated. Cannon Falls A one story enclosed entranceway for a detached single family or duplex dwelling may extend into the front yard setback not exceeding four feet. Brooklyn Park The following are considered a permitted encroachment into the front setback if they extend no more than a distance of six feet: balconies and porches, steps, stoops, and the like provided they do not have a floor higher than the entrance floor to the building and are not enclosed with windows, screens, or the like, although they may have a roof Shorewood A one story enclosed entrance for a detached single-family, two-family or townhouse dwelling, existing prior to adoption of this chapter, may extend into the front yard setback not more than four feet. The entrance shall not exceed six feet in width; Lindstrom Architectural projections extending not more than three feet into a yard area including cantilevered roof overhang, except those indicated below Osseo A one-story enclosed entrance for a detached one-family, duplex, or townhouse dwelling may extend into the front yard setback not exceeding four feet St. Michael A one-story entrance for a detached single-family or duplex dwelling e~ into the front yard setback not exceeding five feet, subject to the approval of the _ Administrator. CITY OF CENTERVILLE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION APRIL 4, 2006 Pursuant to due call and notice thereof: the Planning and Zoning Commission held their regularly scheduled meeting on April 4, 2006, at 6:30 p. m. PRESENT: Acting Chair Klennert Hunt Jeff Hanzal Bob Wright D. Love Tom Wood Mark Pangell ABSENT: Brian Hanson ~ t @ COUNCIL: Council Member Terway STAFF: Mr. Larson, City Administrator I. CALL TO ORDER 1. Roll Call The meeting was called to order at 6:32 p.m. IL APPEARANCES None. III. PUBLIC HEARING(S) 1. St. Genevieve's Church - Requested Variance for Driveway Acting Chair Klennert Hunt opened the public hearing at 6:33 p.m. City Administrator Larson indicated that the Church and the most affected property owner have reached an agreement. Father Fitzgarald indicated he appreciated the request to go back and work something out. Motion bv Commissioner Banzai. seconded bv Commissioner Love. to close the public hearin2. AU in favor. Motion carried unanimouslv. Page 1 of6 Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes April 4, 2006 Acting Chair Klennert Hunt closed the public hearing. Motion bv Commissioner Banzai. seconded bv Commissioner Wood. to recommend Coo.cit ,pproval of the variance for a driveway at Sf. ~evieve's Church subiect to the draft aereement between the Church and the Biehlands. All in favor. Motion c;arried onanimo,sly. IV. OLD BUSINESS 1. Proposed Ordinance #92 - Modifying M-l District Requirements and Adding the M-2 District The Commission and Staff discussed the proposed new district and agreed to set a public hearing to consider it. Commissioner Wood indicated he would like to leave the Church on its own. Motion bv Commissioner W 004. seconded by Commissioner Pan,elL to set a DubHe hearine at the May meetine to discuss amendment of the M-l District and Creation of tbe M-2 Distritt. AU in favor. Motion carried unanimously. The Commission agreed that all should be notified to keep them informed and to improve relations. 2. Proposed Ordinance #93 - Modifying Definitions and Changing Regulations Related to Accessory Structures Commissioner Hanzal said he felt the Ordinance was well drafted. Acting Chair Klennert Hunt asked if swimming pools are an accessory structure. City Administrator Larson indicated that they are. Commissioner Hanzal asked if a greenhouse would be included in this. City Administrator Larson indicated it would be. Motion by Commissioner Banzai, seconded by Commissioner Love, to set a public hearing for the May meeting. All in favor. Motion carried unanimously. V. NEW BUSINESS 1. Mr. Shaun O'Keefe. Purchase Agreement 1605 Peltier Lake Drive - Request Decrease in Minimum Lot Requirements for Lake Lots Page 2 of7 Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes Apri14,2006 Mr. O'Keefe indicated that the lot next door to Mr. Sahlstrom was for sale but now Mr. Sahlstrom property is for sale and this is a double lot as evidenced by survey, which he then provided to the Commission. Mr. O'Keefe indicated that the first half of the lots in the area look to be 75 feet in width and then it goes up to approximately 90 feet of lakeshore. Mr. O'Keefe indicated that Anoka County requires 100 feet oflakeshore so this is nonconforming but according to the neighborhood it would fit in with the makeup of the neighborhood. Mr. Sahlstrom indicated that in order to make the payment on the building to get a mortgage he had to mortgage the lots and at that time they were combined into a single lot. City Administrator Larson explained that the house straddles the property so there is no way to split it without tearing the home down and, even if you do, it does not meet the minimums. He then said that the only way to do this is to change the minimum lot size on lakes. Mr. O'Keefe indicated that he and his brother wish to build houses on each lot. City Administrator Larson indicated that the Ordinance would need to be amended to allow 75 foot lots. Mr. O'Keefe indicated that the frontage along the lake is 174.2 feet. Acting Chair Klennert Hunt indicated that most of the lots in the area are 75 feet wide so it would fit but the Zoning Ordinance does not distinguish between the newer wider lots and the existing older neighborhoods. Acting Chair Klennert Hunt suggested a townhome or duplex with a zero lot line between the homes. City Administrator Larson indicated the City could have a different rule on Peltier Lake by amending the Ordinance. He then said that the minimum lot size is 15,000 square feet. Mr. O'Keefe indicated that he feels the lot size would be approximately 12,000 square feet per lot if the watershed property was purchased and the lots were split. City Administrator Larson asked how much the water utility is willing to sell. Mr. Sahlstrom indicated it is 26 feet. Page 3 of7 Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes Apri14,2006 Commissioner Wright said that the lot width would match the surrounding area if you do different zoning for Peltier Lake. Commissioner Wood indicated that he does not want to change the rules and then find out that the County would not agree. He then said that he does not see a hardship and there is the issue of the lots not meeting the minimum square footage requirements. Acting Chair Klennert Hunt indicated that the City cannot help with this as it just will not work. Commissioner Wood said that a duplex would be allowed based on the rules but the City cannot do a lot split. Mr. Sahlstrom thanked the Commission for trying to find a way to make it work. Mr. O'Keefe thanked the Commission for the attempt to work it out. 2. Royal Excavating Site Plan (2044 Gateway Circle) Mr. Black of Royal Excavating indicated that they would like to make this the location of Royal Excavating and then provided an overview of the site plan for the Commission. City Administrator Larson indicated that metal is not allowed as a construction material in the industrial or commercial districts. Mr. Black indicated that above the elevations if they brought the block wall above the doors they would have to put a header in for the doors all the way across. Commissioner Hanzal indicated that the City has held everyone else to masonry standards and he is concerned that other business owners would not be pleased. Acting Chair Klennert Hunt indicated that she does not think this meets the Ordinance but it does fit in with the other styles of the buildings there and it may be necessary to make allowances for this type of situation. Mr. Black indicated that the vents shown on the picture would not be done on this building. Commissioner Love indicated that the City is looking at developing the downtown and he does not want to set precedent of changing rules up and down because then others will ask for consideration of change. Commissioner Wood suggested that the applicant go and ask what else can be done to mitigate it without breaking the Ordinance. Page 4 of7 Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes April 4, 2006 Acting Chair Klennert Hunt said that she would prefer a revised plan. She then said that the building looks nice but it does not meet the Ordinance as written. City Administrator Larson suggested having the metal wall section above the door but continue the wall of masonry up to the roof Mr. Black said that may be possible but he would have to look at it. He then said that he would make the change and asked for the Commission to send it on to Council for approval subject to the recommended change. Mr. Black indicated that they will fence in the yard for security. Commissioner Wright asked if there is a lot of hazardous materials stored on site. Mr. Black indicated that they are required to provide adequate storage on site as per the Fire Code. He then said that there are two floor drains and there is a trap to separate them to be cleaned out on a regular basis. Motion by Wood. seconded by Love. to recommend <;;ouncil aooroval of the site olan based on the requirement that the metal be decorative exceot over tlJe doors. that the concrete 20 no to tbe roof. and that ~pproYal is subiect to review and aooroval of Staff. All in favor. Motion carried unanimouslv. City Administrator Larson asked the applicant to redraw the plan and provide it to Staff for consideration. VI. DISCUSSION ITEMS None. va CONSIDERATION OF MINUTES 1. March 14. 2006 Planning and Zoning Meeting Minutes Motion by Commissioner Love. seconded by Commissioner Wood to aoorove the Minutes of March 14. 2006. as oresented. All in favor. Motion carried Jlnanimouslv. Page 5 of7 vm. ADJOURNMENT Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes April 4, 2006 Motion bv Commissioner Wood. seconded bv Commissioner BanzaI to Adjourn the ABril 4. 2006 Plannm. Commission MeetiD2 at 8:16 B.m. AD in favor. Motion carried unanimously. Transcribed by: Joan Lenzmeier, Recording Secretary TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc. Page 6 of7