Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2017-05-10 CC Packeteryille CITY OF CENTERVILLE COUNCIL MEETING ,r Wednesday, May 10, 2017 6:30 p.m. or shortly thereafter Set Agenda COUNCIL MEETING I. CALL TO ORDER 1. Roll Call II. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE III. APPOINTMENTS/PRESENTATIONS 1. None. IV. APPROVAL OF AGENDA VI. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. April 26, 2017 City Council Meeting Minutes (Pages 1-6) VII. CONSENT AGENDA 1. City of Centerville April 27, 2017 through May 10, 2017 Claims (Check #31000- 31021) (Pages 7-8) 2. Centennial Lakes Police Claims through April 25, 2017 (Check #11404-11423) (Page 9) 3. Successful Performance Review — Building Official/P.W. Director Mr. Paul Palzer 5. Centerville Lions Donation to P & R (Page 10) 6. Church of St. Genevieve Request for Licensing — Annual Parish Festival (August 20, 2017) a. Temp. On Sale Liquor License (Page 11) b. Charitable Gambling (Bingo, Pull -Tabs & Raffle) (Page 12) 7. Res. #17-OXX — Supporting Local Decision -Making Authority (Pages 13-15) 8. Approve License Agreement w/RCWD — Storm Water Model (Pages 16-22) VIII. OLD BUSINESS 1. Review Fete des Lacs Festival Committee Schedule of Events (Pages 23-28) 2. Final Payment — Anoka County — CSAH21/Centerville Road Project (Pages 2940) 3. Met. Council (MCES) Flow Rate Follow -Up (Pages 41-76) IX. NEW BUSINESS 1. 1688 Heritage Street — Culvert Removal (Pages 78-80) 2. Discussion on City Council Meeting Day and Time (Pages 81-85) 3. Local Water Plan Proposal from City Engineer (Pages 86-98) 4. LaMotte Park Storm Water Reuse System — Air Sampling Test Results (Pages 99- 108) 5. Ready Landscaping, 6867 — 20th Avenue South Request for Encroachment Agreement — (Fence) (Page 77) X. COUNCIL & ADMINISTRATION ANNOUNCEMENTS 1. Administrator Ericson X1. ADJOURNMENT *REMINDERS** Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting — June 6, 2017, 6:30 p.m. (Council Chambers) Parks & Recreation Committee Meeting — June 7, 2017, 6:30 p.m. (Council Chambers) City Council Meeting — May 24, 2017, 6:30 p.m. (Council Chambers) City Council Meeting — June 14, 2017, 6:30 p.m. (Council Chambers) Garage Sale Days — June 9 & 10, 2017 Clean Up Day — June 17, 2017 from 8:00 a.m. — 12:00 (noon) Fete des Lacs — July 21, 22 & 23, 2017 Parade — July 22, 2017 5K/8K/Walk/Run — July 22, 2017 Paddle de Fete — July 23, 2017 (Paddle Board, Canoe & Kayak Race) — No One Left Hungry Foundation Music in the Park — June 13, June 20, June 27, July 11, July 18 & July 25, 2017 (Bands TBD) Night to Unite — August 1, 2017 Movie in the Park — September 16; 2017 — Laurie I .aMotte Memorial Park (Movie TRI)) CITY OF CENTERVILLE CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES April 26, 2017 6:30 p.m. Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, the City of Centerville held their regularly scheduled meeting of April 26, 2017 at City Hall, 1880 Main Street. PRESENT: Mayor Jeff Paar Council Member Russ Koski Council Member D. Love Council Member Matt Montain ABSENT: Council Member Steve King STAFF: City Engineer Mark Statz City Attorney Kurt Glaser City Administrator Mike Ericson COUNCIL MEETING I. CALL TO ORDER Mayor Paar called to order 6:30 p.m. II. APPOINTMENTS/PRESENTATIONS 1. None. Not Approvk Mayor Paar stated that Ms. Teresa Bender was in a car accident this past weekend and wishes her a speedy recovery and that our thoughts and prayers are with her. III. APPROVAL OF AGENDA Mayor Paar added Check #30997 through #30999 under Consent Agenda Item #1 and added Check# 7846 with voided Check #7539 under Consent Agenda Item #3. Motion by Council Member Love, seconded by Council Member Montain to Approve the Agenda with the Above Noted Additions. All in favor. Motion carried. IV. APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES 1. April 12, 2017 City Council Meeting Minutes City of Centerville Council Meeting Minutes April 26, 2017 Mayor Paar provided Council with an opportunity to make modifications. Council Member Love stated that on page 2 on the third line under the valuation reduction, the word increase should be decrease. Motion by Council Member Koski, seconded by Council Member Montain with the changes on page 5, to approve the April 12, 2017 Citv Council Meeting Minutes as Presented. All in favor. Motion carried. VIII. CONSENT AGENDA 1. City of Centerville April 13, 2017 through April 26, 2017 Claims (Check #30984-30996) & #30997 - 30999 2. Centennial Lakes Police Claims through April 11, 2017 (Check #11387- 11403) 3. Centennial Fire District Claims through April 20, 2017 (Check #7828-7845) W/Payroll Check #7828-7831 & check#7846 w/voided ck#7539 4. Hiring of Temporary Seasonal Public Works Technicians — Mr. Jack Drilling, Mr. Joe Drilling, Mr. Andrew Schweitzer and Mr. Dan Anderson 5. CenterPoint Energy Community Partnership Grant Application — Centennial Fire District Mayor Paar provided an opportunity for Council Members to add additional items or remove items for further discussion. Motion by Council Member Love, seconded by Council Member Koski to approve the Consent Agenda as Presented. All in favor. Motion carried. IX. OLD BUSINESS 1. Final Payment — Anoka County — Centerville Road Project Administrator Ericson stated the City received the final pay request for the Centerville Road Project in the amount of $56,837.14. He stated that the original invoice that was issued by Anoka County Highway Department had the incorrect amount. The revised invoice that was presented is the correct amount. Both Mr. Burmeister and Mr. Statz agreed with that amount. Council Member Montain stated he and other residents are concerned about the drainage along Centerville Road. He stated that when it rains the water does not drain properly and ends up creating a pond. There were questions/concerns with the contractor on whether or not they were going to come back in the spring and finish the correct grading of the drainage ditches. Administrator Ericson recommended that the pay request be held for further discussion as Council Member King absent. He stated that Council Member King also had questions/concerns on the final payment request of Centerville Road. Council Member Montain stated that he has emails going back and forth from Anoka County in Page 2 of 6 2 City of Centerville Council Meeting Minutes April 26, 2017 regards to the drainage problems along Centerville Road. Council Member Koski asked if those emails are on record Motion by Council Member Montain, seconded by Council Member Love to table the final Payment to Anoka County until the next council meeting schedule for May 10, 2017. All in favor. Motion carried. X. NEW BUSINESS 1. Metropolitan Council Mapping Services Program Letter of Intent Administrator Ericson stated the City of Centerville received a letter from Metropolitan Council a letter of intent for Mapping Services Program. Administrator Ericson stated the City applied for a $10,000 grant and the City received the grant. He stated after a meeting with Met. Council member Sandy Rummell and Ms. Corrin Hoegen Wendall informed us that the City is eligible to receive free mapping services up to 8 hours. He stated a letter of intent is needed to use this free service. Motion by Council Member Koski, seconded by Council Member Montain to send a letter of intent for the free mappine services as Presented. All in favor. Motion carried. 2. Ground Development Request for Letter of Credit Reduction City Administrator Ericson stated that Ground Development is requesting a $45,500 reduction in their letter of credit to the City. This is reduction that would bring their letter of credit down to a total of $65,648. He stated that there are only 5 building sites left in Pheasant Marsh 3'd Addition. Attorney Glaser stated that Ground Development has several issues and legal issues with their developer's agreement. A lengthy discussion ensued as to the tax forfeiture property, loss of tax revenue, lack of a homeowner's association per the developer's agreement, lack of maintenance of vacant lots, snow plowing and green spaces within the development. Council would like to see if Outlot E would be able to be developed and staff research the surrounding neighbors to purchase the northern Outlot A (which has a drainage utility easement under it). After a lengthy discussion, the consensus was not to reduce the letter of credit. Motion by Council Member Montain, seconded by Council Member Love not to reduce the letter of credit. All in favor. Motion carried. X1. COUNCIL & ADMINISTRATION ANNOUNCEMENT 1. Administrator Ericson a. Severe Weather Awareness Week, April 16-22, 2017 Administrator Ericson stated that April 16 - 22, 2017 is Severe Weather Awareness Week and that the siren did sound off on Thursday at 1:45 p.m. and 6:45 p.m. for a practice Page 3 of 6 3 City of Centerville Council Meeting Minutes April 26, 2017 tornado drill. Mayor Paar stated that the Centennial Lakes Police Department Governing Board is researching alternative ways of notifying residents similar to Amber Alerts received on home phones, cell phones and wireless devices. Council Member Koski questioned if the sirens were delayed. Administrator Ericson stated he would research this item and report back to Council. b. 2017 Fete des Lacs Festival Meeting, April 24, 2017 Administrator Ericson stated the Fete des Lacs Festival meeting on Monday, April 24. They discussed the option of having Public Works assist the festival for with moving the Lions' food trailers, setup/tear down the stage and tent at Kelly's if the band was to be outside. Mayor Paar stated that Public Works does help with the no parking sign for the parade route and they also drive a City truck in the parade. Mayor Paar stated that if the committee is requesting help from Public Works and this requires over -time; this item needs to be added to the next City Council agenda in May for discussion. Also, if Kelly's is going to be having a music outside, they are required to have permits and this item would need to go before council at the in May. Administrator Ericson informed Council that the Festival Committee agreed to have the fireworks take place on Centerville Lake. This company has a barge that they will use. He stated the Parks & Rec Committee has a GIS map of the area so they can show the public where to sit for the best view of the fireworks. By doing this on the lake, the Lions and other events that are set up at the park would not have to tear down for the fireworks and they would be able to keep their operations open. These items will be discussed at the May 10, 2017 meeting. Council Member Love noticed that a proposed boxing event had been cancelled and requested that if in the future it was determined to consider such an event, research be given to the City's Code. The Committee determined that a boxing event did not fit into a "Family Friendly" event. C. Municipal Utilities/Roadways — Overlay projects Administrator Ericson stated that Item c. was an item that was in the packet from the last Council meeting. Item c was placed in the packet as informational as Council Member Montain questioned the height of manholes and water valves for previous Mill and Overlay projects due to resident complaint. d. Meeting Dates Administrator Ericson stated the meeting days will be placed on Council's upcoming agenda. Page 4 of 6 4 City of Centerville Council Meeting Minutes April 26, 2017 Administrator Ericson stated the meeting days will be placed on Council's upcoming agenda. Council Member Love stated registration is open for the parade. Council Member Montain stated that Anoka County Fire Protection Board is tomorrow (April 27). Registration is on line for the 5K/8K run on the City's website. Mayor Paar stated Council's thoughts and prayers go out to Ms. Teresa Bender and hopes she is healing and feeling better. Mayor Paar stated this weekend he will be attending the MN Mayor's Association Conference at Maddens and that he is looking forward to this conference. There are a lot of open forum and discussion on what cities are doing for technology — tablets vs. paper. He stated that they are also going to see some of the shoreline restoration on Gull Lake. Mayor Paar stated that there are several ways that you can be informed about the things that are going on in our City. This would be through the local paper, the city's website, our bi-monthly newsletter and North Metro Cable Channel 16. X1. RECESS TO CLOSED EXECUTIVE SESSION Mayor Paar recessed the regularly scheduled Council Meeting at 8:02 p.m. Respectfully submitted by Kris Sweeney, Senior Account Clerk CLOSED EXECUTIVE SESSION FOR PENDING LITIGATION FOR 7281 MAIN STREET I. CALL TO ORDER Mayor Paar called to order 8:08 p.m. With all Council Members in attendance except Council Member King along with Administrator Ericson, City Attorney Glaser, and Engineer Statz. Minutes will become public at a later date. III. ADJOURNMENT — CLOSED EXECUTIVE SESSION Mayor Paar adjourned the Closed Executive Session at 8:32 p.m. Staff received direction from Council as to proceed with action on the pending litigation at 7281 Main Street. XII. ADJOURNMENT — REGULARY SCHEDULED COUNCIL MEETING Page 5 of 6 �j City of Centerville Council Meeting Minutes April 26, 2017 Motion by Council Member Koski, seconded by Council Member Montain to adjourn the Work Session at 8:34 p.m. All in favor. Motion carried. Respectfully submitted by Michael Ericson, City Administrator Page 6of6 CITY OF CENTERVILLE Check Detail - May 10, 2017 05/04/17 12:41 PM Page 1 ':heck Date Check 0 Vender Name Comments Amount _ 5/5/2017 001029E MINNESOTA DEPT OF REVENUE STATE W/H - PAY PERIOD 9 Check Nbr 001029 MINNESOTA DEPT OF REVENUE $969.81 5/5/2017 001030E IRS/EFTPS FED W/H - PAY PERIOD 9 $2,325.29 5/5/2017 001030E IRS/EFTPS FICA/MED W/H - PAY PERIOD 9$3,720.74 Check Nbr 001030 IRS/EFTPS $6.046.03 5/8/2017 001031E OPTUM BANK - H.S.A. H.S.A W/H - PAY PERIOD 9 Check Nbr 001031 OPTUM BANK -HSA $964.61 5/5/2017 001032E PERA PERA W/H - PAY PERIOD 9 Check Nbr 001032 PERA $2.910.99 4/27/2017 031000 PARR, JEFF REIMBURSE FOR HOTEL FOR MN MAYORS MEETTING SEMINAR Check Nbr 031000 PAAR JEFF $301.56 5/4/2017 031001 POSTMASTER MARCH -APRIL UTILITY BILL 2017 $177.97 5/4/2017 031001 POSTMASTER MARCH -APRIL UTILITY BILL 2017 $177.97 5/4/2017 031001 POSTMASTER MARCH -APRIL UTILITY BILL 2017 $177.96 Check Nbr 031001 POSTMASTER $533.90 5/10/2017 031002 ANCONA TITLE & ESCROW #2017-137847 - 7152 BRIAN DR - REFUND OVER PAYMENT ON Check Nbr 031002 ANCONA TITLE & ESCROW $160.00 5/10/2017 031003 ANOKA COUNTY TREASURY JUNE 2017 BROADBAND $37.50 5/10/2017 031003 ANOKA COUNTY TREASURY JUNE 2017 BROADBAND $37.50 5/10/2017 031003 ANOKA COUNTY TREASURY JUNE 2017 BROADBAND $37.50 Check Nbr 031003 ANOKA COUNTY TREASURY $112.50 5/10/2017 031004 CARPENTER AUTO BODY 2015 CHEV 250OHD SILVERADO - REPAIRS - INSURANCE CLAIM Check Nbr 031004 CARPENTER AUTO BODY $4.016.55 5/10/2017 031005 CENTENNIAL LAKES POLICE DEPT POLICE SERVICES - MAY 2017 Check Nbr 031005 CENTENNIAL LAKES POLICE DEPT $72.929.50 5/10/2017 031006 CITY OF CIRCLE PINES MAY 2017 POLICE BLDG PAYMENT $5,416.67 5/10/2017 031006 CITY OF CIRCLE PINES MAY 2017 POLICE BLDG PAYMENT3$ 40.20 Qt ',)r 031006 CITY OF CIRCLE PINES $5.756.87 5/10/2017 031007 CONNEXUS ENERGY 7087 20TH AVE S - WATER TOWER - SERV THRU 4-18-17 $83.07 5/10/2017 031007 CONNEXUS ENERGY 2085 W CEDAR ST - SERV THRU 4-18-17 $305.19 5/10/2017 031007 CONNEXUS ENERGY 6800 20TH RADIO FOR SCADA - SERV THRU 4-20-17 $12.36 5/10/2017 031007 CONNEXUS ENERGY 6800 20TH RADIO FOR SCADA - SERV THRU 4-20-17 $12.36 5/10/2017 031007 CONNEXUS ENERGY 6900 20TH AVE - LIFT STAT - SERV THRU 4-18-17 $71.88 5/10/2017 031007 CONNEXUS ENERGY STREET LIGHTS - 395653-219699 - SERV THRU 4-20-17 $64.33 5/10/2017 031007 CONNEXUS ENERGY STREET LIGHTS - 395653-219678 - SERV THRU 4-20-17 $52.18 5/10/2017 031007 CONNEXUS ENERGY 7100 20TH AVE N - TRAFSG - SERV THRU 4-24-17 $81.63 Check Nbr 031007 CONNEXUS ENERGY $683.00 5/10/2017 031008 DAHL, KARA 7152 BRIAN WAY - OVER PYMT FINAL UT BILL Check Nbr 031008 DAHL KARA $14.08 5/10/2017 031009 HEALTH PARTNERS COBRA - D LARSON - HEALTH INSURANCE $768.99 5/10/2017 031009 HEALTH PARTNERS MAY 2017 HEALTH INSURANCE $4,028.71 Check Nbr 031009 HEALTH PARTNERS $4.797.70 5/10/2017 031010 ICC GOV. MEMBERSHIP DUES POP UP TO 50,000 - P.PALZER Check Nbr 031010 ICC $135.00 5/10/2017 031011 INTEGRA P.W. PHONE SERVICE THRU 5-22-17 Check Nbr 031011 INTEGRA $83.71 5/10/2017 031012 INTERNATIONAL UNION OF OPERATI UNION DUES - MAY 2017 Check Nbr 031012 INTERNATIONAL UNION OF OPERATI $102.00 5/10/2017 031013 KAY PARK RECREATION DOGIPOT LITTER PICKUP BAGS Check Nbr 031013 KAY PARK RECREATION $282.75 5/10/2017 031014 MINNESOTA PIPE & EQUIPMENT KERF CUTTER VLV BX REPAIR TOOL Check Nbr 041014 MINNESOTA PIPE & FOI IPMFNT $3.500.00 5/10/2017 031015 MN DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH D. SCHMITZ - WATER OPERATOR LICENSE CLASS D #13567 Check Nbr 031015 MN DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH $23.00 5/10/2017 Check Nbr 031016 NATIONWIDE 031016 RETIREMENT NATIONWIDE RETIREMENT SOLUTION SOLUTION DEF COMP W/H - PAY PERIOD 9 $900.00 5/10/2017 031017 OLSON SEWER SERVICE, INC. REPAIR WORK - DUPRE RD & PARTRIDGE PL - RETENTION C. )r 031017 OLSON SEWER SERVICE. INC. $2,870.00 OA CITY OF CENTERVILLE Check Detail - May 10, 2017 05/04/17 12:41 PM Page 2 Check Date Check # Vender Name Comments Amount 5/10/2017 031018 PARR, ]EFF MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT - MAYOR'S CONFERENCE - Check Nbr 031018 PARR. ]EFF $144.45 5/10/2017 031019 TASC 6-1-27 THRU 6-30-17 COBRA ADMIN. FEE Check Nbr 031019 TASC $10.00 5/10/2017 031020 VANTAGEPOINTTRANSFER AGENT DEF COMP W/H - PAY PERIOD 9 Check Nbr 031020 VANTAGEPOINTTRANSFER AGENT $1.000.00 5/10/2017 031021 YOUNG, KEVIN 7149 BRIAN DR - REFUND OVER PYMT ON FINAL UT BILL Check Nbr 031021 YOUNG KEVIN $91.07 Total Checks $109,339.08 FYI... Ck#30984 Anoka County Highway Dept - $56,837.14 Final payment dated 4-26-17 — was held from the April 26, 2017 council meeting. 8 CENTENNIAL LAKES POLICE DEPT Check Register - Police GL without invoice numbers Check Issue Dates: 4/17/2017 - 4/25/2017 .eport Criteria: Report type: Summary GL Check Ck No Period Issue Date Payee 04/17 04/17/2017 11404 HEALTH PARTNERS 04/17 04/25/2017 11405 ANOKA COUNTY 04/17 04/25/2017 11406 ASPEN MILLS, INC 04/17 04/25/2017 11407 BRENT RICHTER CONSULTING LLC 04/17 04/25/2017 11408 CENTURY LINK 04/17 04/25/2017 11409 CONNEXUS ENERGY 04/17 04/25/2017 11410 CONSOLIDATED COMMUNICATIONS 04/17 04/25/2017 11411 DELTA DENTAL 04117 04125/2017 11412 DON'S CIRCLE SERVICE, INC 04/17 04/25/2017 11413 41MPRINT, INC 04/17 04/25/2017 11414 GLOCK PROFESSIONAL, INC 04/17 04/25/2017 11415 IMAGE PRINTING & GRAPHICS, INC 04/17 04/25/2017 11416 LEAGUE OF MN CITIES INS TRUST 04/17 04/25/2017 11417 MMKR INC 04/17 04/25/2017 11418 PERSONNEL CONCEPTS 04/17 04/25/2017 11419 POPP COMUNICATIONS 04/17 04/25/2017 11420 POST BOARD 04/17 04/25/2017 11421 QUILL CORPORATION 04/17 04/25/2017 11422 SUN LIFE FINANCIAL 04/17 04/25/2017 11423 TELECIDE PRODUCTIONS, INC Grand Totals: M = Manual Check, V = Void Check 9 Page: 1 Apr 25, 2017 03:27PM Description MAY HEALTH INS 1ST QTR CJDN/MDT UNIFORMS RB 3 IN OFFICE CONSULTS COMMUNICATIONS ELECTRIC MARCH PHONES MAY COBRA NN VEHICLE REPAIRS & MTC JUNIOR OFFICER BADGES ARMORER'S COURSE AS CRIME PREVENTION POSTER DEDUCTIBLE PROGRESS BILLING 2016 AUDIT SAFETY POSTER DSL LINE FOR WIFI PEACE LIC RENEWAL 4 OFFICERS COPY PAPER/MEMO BOOK VOL LIFE EFT JAN -MAY COMPUTER MTC & SUPPORT Check Amount 19,850.16 540.00 165.29 375.00 126.10 2,048.76 311.01 1,532.20 2,081.49 155.75 250.00 10.50 250.00 3,000.00 12.92 70.90 360.00 113.95 1,079.28 840.00 33,173.31 10 THE CHURCH OF enerieve esto 9 7087 GOIFFON ROAD CENTERVILLE, MN SS038 April 27, 2017 City of Centerville 1880 Main Street Centerville, MN 55038 Subject: St. Genevieve's Parish Festival Sunday, August 20, 2017 Liquor License Enclosed is the completed Application for a temporary license for sale of liquor. This year's event will take place on our Parish Community Center grounds, 6995 Centerville Road. Please feel free to contact the undersigned with any questions. Sincerely, Andrew A. Melcher St. Genevieve Festival Coordinator 952-927-2431 days 11 THE CHURCH OF eneilietle 7087 GOIFFON ROAD CENTERVILLE, MN 55038 April 26, 2017 Centerville City Council City of Centerville 1880 Main Street Centerville, MN 55038 Subject: St. Genevieve's Parish Festival Sunday, August 20, 2017 Dear Council Members: We are requesting your support in approving our gaming permit for our annual Parish Festival. Enclosed is the completed form. We respectfully request your signature and the return of the form to us. Please feel free to contact the undersigned with any questions. Sincerely, Andrew A. Melcher St. Genevieve Festival Coordinator 952-927-2431 days IFA CITY OF CENTERVILLE RES. #17- A RESOLUTION SUPPORTING LOCAL DECISION-MAKING AUTHORITY WHEREAS, local elected decision -makers are in the best position to determine what health, safety and welfare regulations best serve their constituents; and WHEREAS, just like state legislative leaders, local elected officials are held accountable through Minnesota's robust elections process; and WHEREAS, ordinances at the local level are enacted only after a comprehensive, legal and open process; and - WHEREAS, local units of government are required to publish notices about meetings where policies will be discussed and decisions will be made; and WHEREAS, under the state's Open Meeting Law, public policy discussions and decisions must occur in meetings that are accessible to members of the public; and WHEREAS, cities are often laboratories for determining public policy approaches to the challenges that face residents and businesses; and WHEREAS, preservation of local control in Minnesota has yielded statewide benefits such as the 2007 Freedom to Breathe Act, an amendment to the Minnesota Clean Indoor Air Act; and WHEREAS, more than two dozen bills that restrict local decision-making have been introduced in 2017 to date. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CENTERVILLE that this Council supports local decision-making authority and opposes legislation that removes the ability for local elected officials to respond to the needs of their businesses and constituents. ADOPTED by the Centerville City Council this 10th day of May, 2017. Attest: Teresa Bender, Clerk Jeff Paar, Mayor 13 o® AGUE OF CONNECTING & INNOVATING MINNESOTA SINCE 1913 CITIES Resolution of Support for Local Decision -Making The Ability of Local Elected Officials to Directly Respond to the Needs of their Community As of 4/25/2017 42 Resolutions Passed Audubon Olivia Baudette Oronoco Buffalo Ottertail Cambridge Owatonna Carver Prior Lake Currie Proctor Eagan Richfield Eden Valley Rochester Ely Saint Louis Park Eyota Springfield Franklin St. Paul Grant Wabasso Hawley Warren Hopkins Watkins Isanti Whakon Lindstrom White Bear Lake Lucan Maplewood Mazeppa Medford Minneapolis Minnetonka Moorhead Mora North St. Paul Northfield 145 UN IVE RS ITY AVE. WEST ST. PAUL, MN 55103-2044 14 PHONE: (651) 281-1200 FAX (651) 281-1299 TOLL FREE: (800) 925-1122 wEB: www.LMC.oRG More Than 40 Cities Pass Resolutions Supporting Local Decision -Making Authority Pagel of 2 More Than 40 Cities Pass Resolutions Supporting Local ')ecision-Making Authority The resolution, provided by the League, demonstrates cities' objections to a growing trend in the Legislature of introducing and advancing bills that remove or restrict the authority of local elected officials. (Published May 1, 2017) In less than six weeks, more than 40 Minnesota cities have approved resolutions calling on the Legislature to stop advancing bills that place limits on local decision-making authority. The resolution was provided by the League beginning March 20, and is in response to the proliferation of 2017 legislative initiatives aimed at restricting local control. Learn more about the bills and download the resolution (Link to: http://www.lmc.orglpagelIlResolution-localcontrol.jsp) The resolutions have generated media attention and have prompted some legislators to privately suggest they are feeling pressure from local leaders in their districts to oppose bills aimed at interfering with local control. The League expects more cities to pass the resolution as city officials become increasingly concerned about legislative initiatives that would hamper the ability of elected officials to respond to the health, safety, and welfare needs of their constituents, including local businesses. If your city has passed a resolution, please be sure to share it with the League, as well as with your legislators. See the list of cities that have passed the resolution (pdf) (Link to: http://www.lmc.org/media/document/1/localcontrol resolutions.pdf?inline=true) Access the League's Local Decision -Making Authority Advocacy Toolkit (Link to: http: //www. lmc. org/page/1 ILocalAuthorityToolkit jsp) .ead the current issue of the Cities Bulletin (Link to: http://www.lmc.org/page/1/cities-bulletin-newsletter jsp) * By posting you are agreeing to the LMC Comment Policy (Link to: http://www.lmc.orglpagelllcomment-policy.jsp) . 0 Comments MinnesotaCities JS Login - d Recommend L Share AL Start the discussion... Be the first to comment. ® Subscribe 0 Add Disqus to your siteAdd DisqusAdd s Privacy our LMC Resource Sort by Best Contact Anne Finn Assistant IGR Director (651) 281-1263 or (800) 925-1122 http://www.Imc.org/page/1/LocalControlResolutionsUfi5ite jsp?utm_source=Bulletin+May+l+Cities... 5/1/2017 LICENSE AGREEMENT RICE CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT MODELING TOOLS and PRODUCTS Licensee: City of Centerville THIS LICENSE AGREEMENT is entered into by the Rice Creek Watershed District ("District"), a political subdivision of the State of Minnesota, and the City of Centerville, a political subdivision of the State of Minnesota ("User"). WHEREAS the District has developed a set of modeling tools and products (MTP) including: • Geo -spatial (GIS) Data • Hydrology, Hydraulics and Water Quality Models and Data • Survey Geodatabase • HydroViewer Application • DrainageViewer Application WHEREAS the MTP have been developed for application to watershed -wide planning as well as to the evaluation of the local consequences of development or public infrastructure projects; WHEREAS the MTP have been developed with public resources, and it is the District's intent that they be made available to other public bodies and the public generally to provide the greatest public benefit for purposes of water resource planning, management and protection; WHEREAS the District finds that wide usage of the MTP within the watershed has watershed -wide benefit, wishes to promote such use, and therefore has determined not to charge others for their use; WHEREAS the District has determined that the MTP are classified as "trade secret information," nonpublic data and otherwise data not subject to disclosure under the Minnesota Data Practices Act, Minnesota Statutes Chapter 13, but that it is appropriate for the District to provide for the disclosure of the MTP in accordance with certain protections and commitments by User as set forth in this License Agreement; 16 NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing, the District and User agree as follows: 1. Use of Modeling Tools and Products 1.1 Authorized Uses. User is granted a nonexclusive, nontransferable and nonassignable license to use the following MTP: • Geo -spatial (GIS) Data (in Centerville) • Hydrology, Hydraulics and Water Quality Data (for Centerville)_ • Survey Geodatabase (of Centerville) This license shall be in effect only during compliance by User and its agents, consultants and contractors (ACCs) with the terms and conditions of this License Agreement. User and (pursuant to section 1.3) its ACCs may use the MTP in the form provided by the District for User's own authorized purposes and for no other purpose. User and its ACCs may modify or transfer the MTP, or merge MTP data into other data bases, only for User's authorized purposes. User and its ACCs may operate on the MTP data using such proprietary or public software as they independently are authorized to use and may disclose or distribute the products of that operation, but may not disclose or distribute the MTP in the same or substantially the same form as received from the District. User may duplicate the MTP for use by User and its ACCs, provided the central processing units on which the MTP are maintained support only equipment operated by User and its ACCs, and the MTP are used only for User's own authorized purposes. Except for off-site backup pursuant to established procedures, User and its ACCs shall not remove the MTP from their place of business. 1.2 Unauthorized Uses. User and its ACCs shall not use the MTP on behalf of any individual, organization, corporation, government entity, or any other parry other than User. User's ACCs shall use the MTP only in the conduct of User's business and for User's authorized purposes. User and its ACCs shall not duplicate or disclose the MTP to any third parties unless such use, duplication or disclosure is expressly authorized in writing by the District. User and its ACCs shall not charge third parties for the availability of the MTP. This shall not prevent User and its ACCs from charging third parties as otherwise authorized for its software costs, staff time or other ancillary costs associated with modeling and analysis using the MTP. In providing to a third party any MTP or any services involving modeling or analysis using the MTP, User and its ACCs shall include the following statement in writing: "This work uses or contains water resource models andlor data that are the property of the Rice Creek Watershed District. These models and/or data may be available directly from the Rice Creek Watershed District at no charge. " 2 17 User acknowledges that the District has declared the applicability of copyright protection to the MTP. User shall conform to all legal requirements consistent with the copyright status of the data as declared by the District. 1.3 Third Party Access. If it is necessary for User to make the MTP available to an outside ACC for User's authorized purposes, User must obtain from each ACC and provide to the District a signed copy of the Modeling Tools and Products License Agreement Third -Party Certification attached to and incorporated into this License Agreement as Attachment A, and must receive a written authorization from the District. Under the Third -Party Certification, ACCs are subject to all terms and obligations of this License Agreement to the same extent as such terms and obligations apply to User. 1.4 Data Security. User and its ACCs agree to take all necessary and reasonable steps to ensure the MTP are not disclosed or made accessible in whole or in part to third parties except as may be authorized in this License Agreement. User and its ACCs agree they will not knowingly or negligently allow their employees or agents to copy, sell, disclose or otherwise make the MTP available to others. User and its ACCs agree to immediately notify the District by telephone and in writing of any unauthorized sale or other disclosure. User and its ACCs further agree to prevent unauthorized disclosure through appropriate security measures including, but not limited to, providing physical security for copies of the MTP and taking all steps that they take to protect tangible and intangible data products of their own that they regard as proprietary, confidential or nonpublic. 1.5 Data Practices Act. User shall treat the MTP as nonpublic data not subject to public disclosure under the Minnesota Data Practices Act and shalt advise any requestor of the data classification accordingly. User shall notify the District immediately of any challenge to User's withholding of the MTP and shall not release the MTP, or any part thereof, pursuant to the Data Practices Act without written authorization from the District. 1.6 Reservation of Rights. The MTP are the exclusive property of the District, which retains all right, title and interest in the MTP, including the right to license the MTP to other users. Any right or remedy provided to the District in this License Agreement shall be nonexclusive and in addition to any other right or remedy available to the District in law or equity. 1.7 Errors and Omissions. User timely shall advise the District in writing of any errors or omissions it finds within the MTP. This includes but is not limited to advising the District of new or omitted data of which User or its ACCs are aware, as well as of changes to the physical environment at a scale that would be recognized by the MTP. 3 18 2. License Agreement Term and Termination 2.1 Term. The term of this License Agreement commences on execution of this License Agreement by both parties and ends on the January 31 first following commencement. Notwithstanding, the License Agreement shall renew automatically from year to year. However, the District assumes no duty to any User or ACC to update the MTP and it remains the sole and absolute responsibility of User and its ACCs to ensure that the MTP are current, accurate and adequate for any use they choose to make of them. 2.2 Termination. Notwithstanding section 2. 1, the District may terminate this License Agreement at any time on written notice to User if User fails to comply with the terms and conditions of this License Agreement. The District or User may terminate the License Agreement without cause on 30 -day notice to the other party. 2.3 Return or Destruction of MTP. When this License Agreement has been terminated, User must either destroy all copies of the MTP and provide to the District written certification of the destruction, or return all copies of the MTP to the District. 3. Limited Warranty, Disclaimers and Acknowledgement 3.1 Limited Warranty. The MTP provided by the District are made available to User subject to the following limitations and restrictions: (a) User is responsible for the installation and use of the MTP and the results or consequences obtained from User's installation or use of the MTP. (b) The District does not warrant that the MTP are error free, and disclaims any other warranties, express or implied, respecting this License Agreement or the MTP. (c) THE MTP, AND ASSOCIATED MANUALS, REFERENCE MATERIALS AND TECHNICAL DOCUMENTATION (IF ANY), ARE PROVIDED "AS IS" WITHOUT ANY SUPPORT WHATSOEVER AND WITHOUT WARRANTY AS TO THEIR PERFORMANCE, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PARTICULAR PURPOSE. THE ENTIRE RISK AS TO THE RESULTS AND PERFORMANCE OF THE MTP IS ASSUMED BY USER. (d) THE DISTRICT SHALL NOT BE LIABLE FOR ANY INDIRECT, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL, COMPENSATORY OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES, LOSS OF PROFIT, OTHER FINANICAL LOSS, LOSS OF DATA, OR ANY OTHER DAMAGE OF ANY KIND ARISING OUT OF USER'S USE OR ATTEMPTED USE OF THE MTP, OR ANY THIRD PARTY CLAIMS THAT MAY RESULT FROM THE USE OF THE MTP, EVEN IF THE DISTRICT HAS BEEN ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH POTENTIAL LOSS OR DAMAGE. 4 19 3.2 Sole Remedies. User's sole and exclusive remedies for breach of these limited warranties shall be as follows: (a) User may return the MTP to the District, which, at its discretion, may replace or repair the MTP and return the MTP to User; or (b) User may terminate this License Agreement in accordance with section 2, above. 3.3 Indemnification. User shall hold harmless, defend and indemnify the District, its officers, board members, employees and agents from any and all actions, costs, damages and liabilities of any nature related to User's use of the MTP, to the extent permitted by law. Nothing in this License Agreement shall be construed to waive any immunity, defense or limit on liability applicable to the District or User, or otherwise to create any right in User other than the remedies of section 3.2, or any right in any third parry. 3.4 Acknowledgement. The MTP incorporate data compiled or generated by third parties including the City of Blaine. 4. General Terms and Conditions 4.1 Whereas Clauses. All recitals included in this License Agreement are incorporated into and considered a part of the Agreement. 4.2 Amendment. The terms of this License Agreement may be amended only by written agreement of the District and User. 4.3 Governing Law. This License Agreement shall be governed by and interpreted according to the laws of the State of Minnesota. 4.4 Waiver. No waiver of any violation of this License Agreement shall constitute a waiver of any subsequent violation, whether of the same or of any other term. Subsequent performance of any of the terms of this License Agreement shall not constitute a waiver of any preceding violation, regardless of the other party's knowledge of the preceding violation at the time of subsequent performance. The delay or omission of any party's exercise of any right arising from any default shall not affect or impair the party's rights regarding the same or future default. 4.5 No Agency. The District and User are independent parties for all legal purposes hereunder, and nothing herein shall be construed to create an agency, joint venture, partnership or other form of business association between the parties. 4.6 Assignment. User shall not assign, sublet or transfer this License Agreement in whole or in part, without the prior written consent of the District. Any attempt to assign, sublet or transfer this License Agreement without prior written consent shall be void and of no force or effect. 20 4.7 Correspondence. Correspondence regarding this License Agreement or the MTP shall be directed as follows: To the District: Model Licensing Coordinator Rice Creek Watershed District 4325 Pheasant Ridge Drive NE Suite 611 Blaine MN 55449-4539 To User: City of Centerville 1880 Main Street Centerville, MN 55038-9794 4.8 Survival of Provisions. All obligations of User regarding use and protection of the MTP; all obligations to hold harmless, defend and indemnify; and limitations on and disclaimers of all warranties in this License Agreement shall survive termination of the Agreement. 4.9 Authority. The person or persons executing this License Agreement on behalf of User represent that they are duly authorized to execute this License Agreement on behalf of User and represent and warrant that this License Agreement is a legal, valid and binding obligation enforceable according to its terms. INTENDING TO BE LEGALLY BOUND by the foregoing terms: City of Centerville Mike Ericson, City Administrator Date: RICE CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT Administrator Date: Cl 21 ATTACHMENT A MODELING TOOLS and PRODUCTS LICENSE AGREEMENT THIRD -PARTY CERTIFICATION Stantec Consulting Services, Inc. (Stantec) hereby requests authority to exercise rights to use the Rice Creek Watershed District's Modeling Tools and Products as an agent, consultant or contractor to the City of Centerville under the License Agreement executed on between the City of Centerville and the Rice Creek Watershed District. In assuming that authority, and in consideration therefore, Stantec hereby represents and affirms that it has received and is familiar with the cited License Agreement, that its authority is limited by the terms of the Agreement, and that it is fully subject to all limitations, obligations and liabilities set forth in that Agreement to the same extent as if it were a signatory thereto. Stantec Consulting Services, Inc. By (Mark R. Statz, PE - Associate) Date: (Notary Acknowledgment) 7 22 Memorandum To: Hon. Mayor Paar and Hon. City Council Members CC: Mike Ericson, City Administrator, Paul Palzer, Public Works Director From: Charles Roberts, Administrative Intern on behalf of the Fete des Lacs Festival Committee Date: May 3, 2017 Re: Public Works Assistance — Fete des Lacs Festival Live Band Background: Fete des Lacs is the City of Centerville's annual summer festival. The 2017 Fete des Lacs Committee was established to help coordinate and improve the experience of the festival goers and activities. One of the most popular draws of Fete des Lacs is the live music concert. This year, the band Trout will be performing at an outdoor stage located in the rear portion of Kelly's Korner Bar and Grill's parking lot. However, Fete des Lac relies mainly on volunteers and the Centerville Lions to make many of the events happen and run smoothly. Recommendation: Given the importance of Fete des Lacs, it is recommended that the City Council authorize the use of Public Works staff, specifically but not exclusively the seasonal employees, to assist the Centerville Lions with the set up and tear down of the concert stage, tent, crowd control fencing and the relocation of the Lion's concession trailer for the 2017 Fete des Lacs City Festival. The work would take place during normal work week/hours. No overtime would be authorized 23 AGENDA 2017 CENTERVILLE FETE DES LACS FESTIVAL COMMITTEE MONDAY, APRIL 24, 2017 - 6:30 PM Centerville City Hall 6:30 pm 1. Welcome and Introductions — Mike Ericson 6:35 pm 2. Review Charge from Centerville Lions and Businesses "Fan Family Event That Builds Community" - Need New Theme — Committee agreed on a "Wild West" Theme • 2017 Festival is July 18-23 — Tuesday -Sunday • Recap from Kerri Kolstad, Race Director 6:55 pm 3. Review of 2017 Committees • Sponsorship - Donations and In -Kind Gifts • Publicity: Still on going with the website o fetedeslacs.org and Facebook o One Page Poster and Tri -Fold o North Metro TV- Will be using the drone this year • Banners and Signage • Sports Events o Softball — Todd Steffen actively recruiting teams and will be Mid -West events for sign ups o Kickball o Celebrity Kickball - Todd / Bill / Pete o Running Race — Kerri o Paddling/Canoe/Paddleboard Event — Pat Branch - Safety Briefing with Bald Eagle Ski club, CLPD, CFD o Kids Abilities Kick Ball 5:00pm Friday o Bean Bag toss Sunday 10-2? o Committee discussed possible Boxing event, however city ordinance prohibited it. The committee respectfully decided to pass. This could still be an event at a different time/weekend • Family Activities o Inflatables and Petting Zoo — Lions — Friday night to draw families for fire works o Gold Star Carnival Face Painting/Balloon Guy/ Kiddie Carnival o Music — Tom Lee — The band Trout will play outside @ Kelly's. Committee Requests that Public Works staff help the band set up tent/stage/orange fencing o Food — Lions o Parade / Solicit Bands/Crunch — Jeff, Ben, Mike & Teresa -Parade will start at Brian Drive and Main Street, then end the same place as last year 24 o Fireworks — City / Lions / CLPD / CFD / Radio Club - Had good meeting with Ben From Hollywood Pyro. and festival committee members including John Thill - Want to keep Lion's Food/Beer tent open as long as possible, especially during the fireworks - Offer to shoot fireworks closer to St. Gen's church - Option to shoot fireworks over the lake - Eliminates set up at park/ keeps Lion's food/beer open during show - Hollywood Pyro. Does water shows @ 12 other locations, including Lake Minnetonka o Volleyball Tourney and Band — Kelly's - Will happen at Kelly's o Golf Tournament — Kelly's — A Friday Event o Bald Eagle Water Ski Show — Tina Lobin o History Exhibit w/Tom Dupre and family — Looking to expand the hours of open house. o Remax will have short hot air balloon rides @ vacant lot across from Kelly's 6pm-8pm on Saturday • Insurance — Paul Steffel — Farmers /LMCIT • Master Map — Mike and Kerri • Security — CLPD — Sgt. Bill Jacobson • K-9 / CERT / Fire Demos — CLPD & CFD & Michelle • Refuse/Recycling — Lewis Segl & WM & Mary Lou 7:05 pm 4. Volunteers • Lions • Park & Recreation • Centerville Elementary PTA Committee • Centennial High NHS & PEER Leaders • Main Street Business Association • Boy Scouts and Girls Scouts • St. Genevieve Catholic Church — Mary Lou • Anoka County Radio Club — Bob, Jeremiah, Tom • Eagle Brook Church 7:20 pm 5. Discussion on Major Sponsors: 7:25 pm 6. Schedule Next Meeting for May 22 — 41 week due to Memorial Day 7:30 pm 7. Adjournment 25 7 L -k, � - 4cc 64re ��%r� - I 4�:�77011— d=,,WtMFr7ele7 Prepared by: ~4 OWr -7 Date,::p -7 2 v 4 Yuc) o"ie- ILV 5 _ 6 ! NIAhoMAir 7 9 12 13 14 16 17 18 22 23 it 24 2E LC I 27 28 Feta des Lacs Action hem April 21, 2017 Assigned to Date Contact PEN/CLOSEI Update General Renuiremetrts 1 Registration and Promotion Registration Numbers-,regstratioi�s, t Booth at Kids n Biz Mike open # Vadnais Heights Business Event Patti open '• lIk" ': - ,' .+" Shake Your Shamrock Brigid Put brochure in swag bags Midwest Events Advertising Kerri Brigid Brigid to add us to newsletter Citizen Newspaper Mike/Kerri Shannon Granholm. .�., ate..- L • 2 Logo - updated for 2017 open .z;. 4�,;Si!� ., e.3USa'sKerri 3 Volunteers Parks and Rec Build an email to recruit volunteers School Mike/Charlie open Contact School District and Centerville PTA - Friday flash Radio Club Kerri Bob Cordell says 7 - 10 radio club Eaglebrook Church Mike Wes Peterson let them know what volunteers we need 4 Sponsors/Events Mike/Kerri/Parks-n-Ree ongoing promotion by the Fete des Lacs committee Sponsorship Updates Mike delegate open Review sponsors each meeting Sponsor Levels Kerri/Mike closed Review new tiered $$ chart Vendor Letter to give to Sponsors Mike closed Teresa mailing week of March 20th Visit with Kellys Korner Mike open volleyball and golf? Sponsorship? Canoe/Kayak/Paddleboard Event Pat closed Fireworks Mike closed barge on water Friday night Hot Air Balloon Mike Mike open open �t5, :fit, y k.•. x,i• +, ;-^.: -+.. :' ;„�•. e ', ;, ^.�� A rya,,•' F1 > ��'•.;: Boxing Event Softball and Kickball open , Ares n;_ .,..' _ ; •: Y r'»,'•'... -. Parade Route and VIP Seating open make sure we set up VIP seating 6c 0 • ;'yam 5 Kids Run Sponsor Kerri Renae open Pricing Pat/Mike/Kerri closed $30 for adults - $20 for kids 18 and under Awards Kerri 1st, 2nd, and 3rd Male and Female - 8K and 5K?? 5K - Top 3 finishers - 8K Top 3 finishers - include age brackets if we r89 Age Categories? Mike/Randy have the budget Brochure and Posters Katie open Katie from Lions working on these City Signage Mike date?? Bill Weigle Signs open LeeAnn at Taymark - 612.670.2644 - recommended by Katie closed Theresa will receive these and track on spreadsheet Paper Registration Form 10 Race Day Giveaways - for all runners Kerri Prize drawing for all runners Work with sponsors on prizes too! Swag Bag Items Mike and Kerri 11 Race Day Food/Water Mike confirmed Wiseguys is on board bananas, salty items, oranges sliced Kerri Race ('Roum to be for 2017 Kerri/Brian closed Kerri to take final measurements in July 12 changed PraBaco 13 Permit ' Insurance Requirements Deborah c^hreiber Anoka County Teresa Debora. eiber closed I Insurance Paperwork to the County end of March when renen 14 City of Centerville Organics and Recycle Effort thru County Kerri ike/Nancy[Kerri Mike in open? Lewis Seg] Nanacy to order items we need for the day through Lewis 15 UST&F Approval of Measurement closed NO longer USTAF certified 16 17 18 Course Miles and Signage Marked Master Map of all activities/parking/traffic/parade flow Police and Medical Communication Kerri Kerri Sgt. Bill Jacobson opentiY'' set up a couple of days before determine where we want them to be 19 Tshirts ordered thru Frontrunner Screenprint Kerri $5.50/shirt - $7.50 for 2XL - $2 fee passed to customer Upgrade to Tech Shirts Mike/Kerri $6.50 Shirts for Volunteers? Kerri F Arch and Balloon Man Kerri Randy Fulton will loan these to us - get before race day 20 Registration Requirements - Numbers/Pins, etc. Kerri - 21 Registration Mgmt Midwest Events Brigid Registration is OPEN - money sent to Teresa 2x/month 22 Facebook and Social Media Management Kerri Web and F8 all about the week, not just running 23 Confirm Barb on Race Timing Kerri Barb Leininger closed $3.75/runner + $75 for equipment 24 Additional Porta Potties if needed Mike Onsite Sanitation open Will need one by Music in the Parking Lot Race Dy 25 Water Stops Stop 1 Stop 2 8K Race Starter parks n rec Who assigned? $K Race Starter parks n rec C Who assigned? 1 26 Race Day Food Set -Up Runner Warm - UP and SWAG BAG Awards Ceremom Mike/Kerri Marissa 651.528.8254 H��t�`$C?�+ae°of �� "' ' ,h ",4, ,F _, j, Where will this be held?? 27 Photographer Assigned Kerri Aimee Baxter closed Run Race ONLY 28 Aid/Medical Tent Mike 29 Registration Table and Tshirt distribution - volunteers Kerri 30 Cash Box/Forms for same day registration Kerri 31 PA system Brian 32 Race Announcer Loren closed loren confirmed 33 Banners/Signage at start/finish Sponsor names, Directions, Parking, Mike/Kerri Finish Line Attraction - Balloon ArchBlow Up Man Mike/Kerri 34 Manage Volunteers and Keep Busy Kerri/Ryan 35 Clean Up Course everyone Post Race 37 Post the Results with Timing Company Kerri Determine results location and quick turnaround 38 Post Race Stories & Social Media Updates Kerri/Mike 39 Volunteer Thank You's Kerri/Mike 40 Sponsor Thank You's I Kerri/Mike Anoka County Highway Department - payments for Centerville Road 1 5/13/2015 CK# 29419 $ 646,000.00 2 8/26/2015 CK#29661 $ 241,040.00 3 4/26/2017 CK#30984 $ 56,837.14 $ 943,877.14 $ 238,000.00 JPA#2013-0626A Amendment 1 ($238,000) paid with ck #29419 $ 408,000.00 JPA #2013-0626A Amendment 1($408,000) paid with ck #29419 29 JPA# 2013-0626B - Amendment 2 removal of the color concrete JPA# 2013-0626 Final 5% H!ghway TrZ.,s,t S.Survayz)r GIS I= 6 e -et Anoka County TRANSPORTATION DIVISION Respectful, Innovative, Fiscally Responsible April 14, 2017 City of Centerville 1880 Main Street Centerville, MN 55038 ATTN: Mike Ericson, City Administrator RE: JPA #2013-0626 Project #SAP 002-621-010 RECEIVED APR 17 2017 FJr^A�- InSePle the project, please accept this *REVISED letter of invoice f r a City of Centerville's reimbursement to Anoka County per th I. This amount represents the final 5% due ($943.877.14 minus $646,000 paid on 5/18/15, and the JPA Amendment o.l amount of $241,040.00 on 8/31/15) per the Joint Powers Agreement. In preparing your remittance to the "County", please refer to Project #002-621-010 and make your payment payable to: Anoka County Highway Department Attn: Cindy Kriesel 1440 Bunker Lake Boulevard NW Andover, Minnesota 55304 If you have any questions regarding this invoice or the project, please do not hesitate to contact me at 763-324-3102. Respectfully, Cindy Kriesel Contracts Administrator Enclosures qs� - u3No-300 i hi,or 1 ; 1:e E! .I ('•Pili -,"n w: r i]hl 5i- (;A --4C) , ,i o 1: c Vlis :',-'S:.i ?L�i--jiG) :- Fax7 !:.•;�-31i U'Li) 30 Anoka County Contract No. 2013-0626A AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT FOR THE RECONSTRUCTION OF COUNTY STATE AID HIGHWAY 21(CENTERVILLE ROAD) FROM COUNTY STATE AID HIGHWAY 34 (BIRCH STREET) TO CSAR 14 (MAIN STREET) IN THE CITIES OF CENTERVILLE AND LINO LAKES, MN COUNTY PROJECT NO. S.A.P. 002-621-10 THIS AMENDMENT is made and entered into this d9bt day of 2014, the date of the signature of the parties notwithstanding, by and between the County of Anoka, a political subdivision of the State of Minnesota, 2100 Third Avenue, Anoka, Minnesota 55303, hereinafter referred to as the "County," and the City of Centerville, 1880 Main Street, Centerville, Minnesota 55038, hereinafter referred to as the "City". WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, it is mutually agreed upon that the County and the City wish to amend its Joint Powers Agreement for the reconstruction of CSAH 21 (Centerville Road) between CSAH 34 (Birch St) and CSAH 14 (Main St), hereinafter referred to as the "Project"; and, WHEREAS, Section XII. ENTIRE AGREEMENT REQUIREMENT OF A WRITING of said Agreement provides that any alterations, variations or modifications of the provisions of this Agreement shall be valid only when they have been reduced to writing and duly signed by the parties. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants hereinafter stated or contained in the Agreement, the parties do hereby agree as follows: 1. The parties agree to delete Section III "Costs" of Anoka County Contract No. 2013-0526 in its entirety and replace it with the following: The contract costs of the work, or if the work is not contracted, the cost of all labor, materials, normal engineering costs and equipment rental required to complete the work, shall constitute the actual "construction costs" and shall be so referred to herein. "Estimated costs" are good faith projections of the costs, which will be incurred for this project. Actual costs will vary and those will be the costs for which the relevant parties will be responsible. This cost estimate includes a storm sewer cost share for the project of 75% City/25% County. 31 The estimated construction cost of the total project is $3,280,000. The total estimated cost (construction + 8% construction engineering) to the City is $680,000 (with deleting watermain and sanitary sewer work south of Dupre). Upon award of the contract, the City shall pay to the County, upon written demand by the County, thirty five percent (35%) of its portion of the cost of the project estimated at $238,000. The City shall pay an additional sixty percent (60%) of its portion of the cost of the project estimated at $408,000 by April 15, 2015. The City's share of the cost of the project shall include only construction and construction engineering expense and does not include engineering design and administrative expenses incurred by the County. Upon final completion of the project, the City's share of the construction cost will be based upon actual construction costs. If necessary, adjustments to the initial ninety five percent (95%) charged to the city will be made in the form of credit or additional charges to the City's share. Also, the remaining five percent (5%) of the City's portion of the construction costs shall be paid. 2. This Amendment is hereby made a part of and shall be amended to the Agreement of the parties. 3. All other terms and conditions of the original Agreement and Amendments shall remain In full force and effect. -2- 32 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have signed this Amendment on the dates written below. COUNTY OF ANOKA By: Rhonda Sivarajah, Chair County Board of Commissioners Dated: ATTEST By: Jerry Soma County Administrator Dated: RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL By: Douglas W. Fischer, P.E. County Engineer Dated: APPROVED AS TO FORM By: Dan Klint Assistant County Attorney Dated: -3- 33 CITY OF CENTERVILLE Thomas Wilharber Mayor Dated: 10/f i `l By: Dallas Larson City Administrator Dated: /a/ Z Z// q By: Dated: P:\02-621-10\Contract Admin\FINALIZATION DOCS\FINAL Schedule I xkx 04/14/2017 10:25 AM ITEM ITEM NO. DESCRIPTION SCHEDULE'S" 03-07-17 UNIT PRICE PRICE TOTAL PROJECT QUANTITY QUANTITY AMOUNT FINAL CONSTRUCTION COSTS CSAH 21 (CENTERVILLE ROAD) FROM CSAH 34 (BIRCH ST.) TO CSAH 14 (MAIN ST.) STATE AIDNON-PARTICIPATING PARTICIPATING STORM SEWER COUNTY OF ANOKA=25.0% LOCAL COUNTY OF ANOKA SAP 002.621.010 SAP 002.621-010 CENTERVILLE- 75.0% COUNTY OF ANOKA CITY OF CENTERVILLE (A) (el (C) (D) QUANTITY AMOUNT QUANTITY AMOUNT QUANTITY AMOUNT QUANTITY AMOUNT FHOUR 2041810 TRAINEES $5.00 2101501 CLEARING ACRE $3,00000 065 $1,950.00 0.55 $1,950.00 21� W CL 194 TREE 3Q 00 _" dig. 318.00 $66,780.00 103.000 $21,630.00 2101506 GRUBBING ACRE $3,00000 085 $1,95000 0.65 $1,950.00 2101AQ7 ,! TREE, 178.00 $36,980.00 103.000 $21,830.00 2104.501 REMOVE PIPE CULVERTS LIN FT $10.00 142900 $14,290.00 1429.00 $14,290.00 2104.501 REMOVE PIPE SEWERS(SANITARY) LIN FT $1600 2104.501 REMOVE SEWER PIPE LIN FT $1000 616.00 $8,180.00 818.00 $8,160.00 2104501 REMOVE CURB AND GUTTER LIN FT $200 92460 $1,849.20 924.60 $1,84920 2104 501 REMOVE BITUMINOUS CURB LIN FT $2.00 118.00 $23600 118.00 $23800 2104.501 IREMOVEFENCE LIN FT $4.50 60.00 $27000 60.00 $27000 2104.503 REMOVE BITUMINOUS WALK SQ FT $1.00 95000 $95000 95000 $950.00 2104.503 REMOVE CONCRETE WALK SQ FT $0.60 4375.50 $2,825.30 437550 $2,62530 2104 505 REMOVE CONCRETE DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT SQ YD $800 29524 $2,36192 295.24 $2,381.92 2104.505 REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT SO YD $1.62 14676.74 $23,776.32 1 1467674 $23,776.32 2104 509 REMOVE PIPE APRON EACH $10000 53.00 $5,300.00 53.00 $5,300.00 2104 509 REMOVE HEAD WALL EACH $100.00 100 $100.00 100 $100.00 2104 SW REMOVE MANHOLE OR CATCH BASIN EACH $52500 1600 $8,400.00 1600 $8,400.00 2104.509 REMOVE BITUMINOUS FLUME EACH $20000 100 $200.00 100 $200.00 2104 509 REMOVE MAIL BOX SUPPORT EACH $7500 2200 $1,850.00 22.00 $1105000 2104.511 SAWING CONCRETE PAVEMENT (FULL DEPTH) LIN FT $800 11200 $672.00 112.00 $67200 2104.513 SAWING BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT (FULL DEPTH) LIN FT $3.00 157350 $4,720.50 1573.50 $4,720.50 2104 523 SALVAGE SIGN TYPE C EACH $2600 49.00 $1,27400 900 $23400 40 000 $1,04000 2104.523 SALVAGE SIGN TYPE D EACH $42.00 1000 $420.00 10.00 $420.00 2104.523 SALVAGE SIGN TYPE SPECIAL EACH $26.00 700 _$18200 700 $18200 2104 523 SALVAGE CASTING EACH $280.00 11.00 $2,880.00 1100 $2,860.00 2104 523 SALVAGE MANHOLE EACH $1,600 00 2104 601 HAUL SALVAGED MATERIAL LUMP SUM $2,00000 100 $2,000.00 1.000 $2,000.00 2105.501 COMMON EXCAVATION (EV) P CUYD $908 18412.00 $187,180.98 18412.00 $167,180.96 2105 505 MUCK EXCAVATION CU YD $14.00 456.00 $6,384.00 456 ODO $6.38400 2105.507 SUBGRADE EXCAVATION (EV) (P) CU YD $9.08 4248802 $385,809.62 42468.02 $385,60962 2105.522 SELECT GRANULAR BORROW (LV) CU YD $13.60 65948.32 $896,869.95 63983.32 $870,173.15 1,963.000 $26,696.80 2105 801 COMMON CHANNEL EXCAVATION LS $9,80000 1.00 $9.80000 0.25 $2,45000 0 750 _$7,35000 21U58 GEOTEXTIL3 FABRIC TYPE W BY' 9b 104.(90 $208,10;, 26.00 $52.00 78.000$15600 2123.509 DOZER HOUR $130.00 1010 $1,313.00 10.10 $1,313.00 2130.501 WATER MGALLON $1000 45.00 $450.00 4500 $450.00 2211.501 JAGGREGATE BASE CLASS 5 TON $11.00 72014 $7,921.54 07.00 $737.00 653140 $7,18454 2211 503 JAGGREGATE BASE (CV) CLASS 5 P) CU YD $2100 5886.40 $118,994.40 5886.40 $118,90440 2232.501 MILL BITUMINOUS SURFACE SO YD $360 2371.90 $8,53884 2371.90 $8,53884 2331.800 IsiTummousPAVEmrNT RECLAMATION SO YO $188 827547 $15,557 88 827547 $15,55788 2357 502 JBITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR TACK COAT GALLON $002 2107.98 $4216 2107.98 $4216 2360.501 TYPE SP 12 5 WEARING COURSE MIX (2,B) TON $8300 871.57 $55,74031 36557 $30,342.31 306 000 $25.39800 2360501 TYPE SP 12.5 WEARING COURSE MIX 3,F TON $7600 479503 $364,422.28 4795.03 $364,42228 2360.502 TYPE SP 12 5 NON WEAR COURSE MIX (3,B) TON $66.00 8899.20 $442,14720 6699.20 $442,147.20 2380 505 TYPE SP 12 5 BITUMINOUS MIXTURE FOR PATCHING TON $20800 6886149 $14,323.19 68.86149 $14,323.19 2451.509 AGGREGATE BEDDING (CV) CUYD $22.40 3310 $741.44 3310 $741.44 2451.513 FINE FILTER AGGREGATE LV CUYD $38.00 2451 607 TRENCH STABILIZATION MATERIAL (CV) CUYD $4540 250.00 $11,350.00 25000 $11,35000 2501.511 15" RC PIPE CULVERT CLASS III LIN FT $42.00 384.00 $16,128.00 384.00 $18,128.00 2501.511 24" RC PIPE CULVERT CLASS III LIN FT $45.00 194.00 $8,73000 194.00 $81730.00 2501.5;4 48' RC PIPE CULVERT CLASS V LIN FT ='.524200 '1 2501 515 15" RC PIPE APRON EACH $67600 14.00 $9,484.00 1400 $9,464.00 2501.515 18" RC PIpE APRON EACH $732.00 100 $732.00 1.00 $732.00 PA02-621-10\Contra, 'FINALIZATION DOCS\FINAL Schedule I.xI= 04/14/20- '5 AM ITEM STEM NO. DESCRIPTION SCHEDULE "I" 03-07-17 UNIT UNIT PRICE TOTAL PROJECT QUANTITY QUANTITY AMOUNT FINAL CONSTRUCTION COSTS CSAH 21 (CENTERVILLE ROAD) FROM CSAH 34 (BIRCH ST.) TO CSAH 14 (MAIN STATE AID STORM SEWER NON -PARTICIPATING PARTICIPATING COUNTY OF ANOKA-25.0% LOCAL COUNTY OF ANOKA SAP 002-621.010 SAP 002.021-010 CENTERVILLE- 75.0% COUNTY OF ANOKA CITY OF CENTERVILLE (A) (8) (C) (D) QUANTITY AMOUNT QUANTITY AMOUNT QUANTITY AMOUNT QUANTITY AMOUNT 2508.501 CONST. DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DESIGN 60.4020 LIN FT $32000 26.60 $8,51200 2860 $8,512.00 2 #CONST. DIVA f11E'iiTJ -_ L81'F7 `III: - - $2 ,88- 4.80 $2,381.60 256$; 1 CONST Rwo 72.4020 LIN Ft 00; : '. « ; ^, 89' 8940 $36,29840 z5or.sof T,DRA g STAUN781a2o 2508.501 CONST DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DESIGN 984020 LIN'FT LIN FT aD $72500 840 $6,090.00 14.90 $8,61220 8.40 $6,09000 2n�kM7,r,�q CON9T. g LIN FT _ 7 1800 517,71200 og. 1 T. - '` LM tIT i" "ft40: 'E# 1110 $14,407.80 ,518 OASTING,"Y - EACH - .' '•� 39.00 $25.508.00 29.00 $18.988.00 2506 521 INSTALL CASTING EACH 5480 00 2508.522 JADJUST FRAME AND RING CASTING EACH 5368.00 1000 $31680.00 10.00 $3,880.00 2508.802 JINSTALLMANHOLF EACH $2,570.00 2508.802 CONST DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DESIGN SPECIAL EACH $1,93000 2511 501 RANDOM RIPRAP CLASS 11 CU YD $10900 3.00 $327.00 3.00 $327.00 6.00 $854.00 57 $6,21300 IV CU YD . 41"m 1 38 $4,142.00 2511.515 GEOTEXTILE FILTER TYPE III SO YD $380 4000 $15200 4000 1 $152.00 2521 501 4' CONCRETE WALK SO FT $448 768.52 $3,427.00 768.52 $3,427.80 2531.501 CONCRETE CURB S, GUTTER DESIGN 8424 LIN FT $1100 701890 $81,41924 348140 $40,384.24 3,537.5 $41,03500 2531 501 tCONCRETE CURB S, GUTTER DESIGN 8818 LIN FT $1850 506.00 $9,381.00 508.00 $9,361.00 2531 507 6' CONCRETE DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT SO YD $4900 191.18 $9,368.84 191.16 $9,38084 2531 804 CONCRETE DRAINAGE FLUME SO YD $68 00 2531 618 TRUNCATED DOMES SO FT $3000 22400 $8,720.00 18800 $5,640.00 36 $1,08000 2531 618 PEDESTRIAN CURB RAMP SO FT $480 171629 $8,238.19 157229 $7,548 99 144 $691120 2535.501 BITUMINOUS CURB LIN FT $11.20 71.00 $795.20 7100 $795.20 2540.602 INSTALL MAIL BOX SUPPORT EACH $175.00 1800 $3,150.00 18.00 $3,150.00 2540 802 RELOCATE MAIL BOX SUPPORT 0777-7 7f, 77, 7 7111117=1 2583810 POLICE OFFICER EACH HOUR $2DO 00 $12000 300 9.50 5800.00 $1,140.00 300 9.50 $600.00 $1,140.00 2564.531 SIGN PANELS TYPE C SO FT $32.00 41900 $13,408.00 41900 $13,408.00 2564.536 INSTALL SIGN PANEL TYPE C EACH $10000 400 $40000 400 $400.00 2564 536 INSTALL SIGN PANEL TYPE D EACH $130.00 1600 $2,080.00 18.00 $2,080.00 2584.537 INSTALL SIGN TYPE SPECIAL EACH $13000 7.00 $910.00 7.00 $910.00 2564 602 CULVERT MARKER X4-3 EACH $54.00 7.00 $378.00 700 $378.00 2573 502 SILT FENCE, TYPE MACHINE SLICED LIN FT $2 48 3577.00 $8,790 42 3577 DO $8,799.42 2573.505 1 FLOTATION SILT CURTAIN TYPE MOVING WATER LIN FT $1800 2573 530 STORM DRAIN INLET PROTECTION EACH 5100.00 5700 $5,700.00 57.00 $5,70000 40 M LOG LOG LIN FT '$4:00 - 420.60 ,880. 338.00 $1,352.00 82.000 $32800 50 EROSION CONTROL SUPERVISOR LUMP SUM $1,40000 100 $1,40000 075 $1.050.00 0250 $35000 501 SEEDING P) ACRE $64000 4.00 $2,580.00 400 $2,58000 502 SEED MIXTURE 250 POUND $5 70 35500 $2.02350 35500 $2,023.50 SEEDMIXTURE`3.t0 POUND -.523.90 ["i 178.00 S4,2S4'2P• 158.00 $4,015.20 10.000 $239.00 505 SODDING TYPE SALT RESISTANT SQ YD $640 11533.21 $73,81254 1153321 $73,812.54 511 MULCH MATERIAL TYPE 1 V2575 TON $414.00 150 $621.00 1.50 $621.00 519 OISKANCHORING (P ACRE $200.00 2.00 $52000 2.00 $520.00 523 EROSION CONTROL BLANKETS CATEGORY 00 SQ YD $180 14464.70 $28,03646 1440470 $28,038.18 523 E OSKIIP 9VJThnL BLANKET'S CA't'BGORY I SQ YD 1.98 '- 1222200 523, .12 10872 00 $21,309.12 1,350 $2,848.00 532 FERTILIZER TYPE 3 POUND $098 975.00 $95550 97500 $955.50 532 FERTILIZER TYPE 4 POUND $1.10 200.00 $22000 200.00 $220.00 571 RAPID STABILIZATION METHOD 3 M GALLON $484.00 1430 $0.921.20 14.30 $8,921.20 2582 502 24' SOLID LINE WHITE - PREFORMED THERMOPLASTIC LIN FT $21.50 5200 $1,118.00 5200 $1,11800 2582.502 24" SOLID LINE YELLOW - PREFORMED THERMOPLASTIC LIN FT $21.50 809 50 $13,104.25 6D9 50 $13,104.25 2582.502 4' SOLID LINE WHITE - EPDXY I LIN FT 10.44 15474 80 18,808 E 15474.80 58,808.82 2582 502 4' SOLID LINE YELLOW - EPDXY LIN FT $0 44 1749 00 $789 56 1749 00 $788 58 2562 502 4' BROKEN LINE YELLOW - EPDXY LIN FT $044 45000 $19800 1 45000 $198.00 2582.502 4' DOUBLE SOLID LINE YELLOW - EPDXY LIN FT $0.88 686570 $6,04182 1 686570 $6,04182 P.\02-621-10\Contract Admin\FINALIZATION DOCS\FINAL Schedule I.xlsx ITEM NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION State Funds Available Federal Funding 7 UNIT 04/14/2017 10:25 AM FINAL CONSTRUCTION COSTS CSAH 21 (CENTERVILLE ROAD) FROM CSAH 34 (BIRCH ST.) TO CSAR 14 (MAIN ST.) STATE AID STORM SEWER NON -PARTICIPATING TOTAL PARTICIPATING COUNTY OF ANOKA-25.0% LOCAL UNIT PROJECT QUANTITY COUNTY OF ANOKA SAP 002.621-010 PRICE SAP 002-621-010 CENTERVILLE-75.0% COUNTY OF ANOKA CITY OF CENTERVILLE (A) IS) (C) (D) QUANTITY I AMOUNT QUANTITY I AMOUNT QUANTITY 7 AMOUNT QUANTITY I AMOUNT QUANTITY I AMOUNT A B C D Funding Group, Totals, Total Federal Eligible Items, Federal Funds Available Rounded to 0 36", 42" Pipe and 8' Bit Path Included to the City Cost. SAP 002-621-010, CSAH 21 - FUNDING SPLITS PROJECT TOTALS aTOTALS ANOKA COUNTY STATE AID FEDERAL FUNDS FUNDS LOCAL FUNDS A,B,C CITYOF CENTERVILLE FEDERAL STATE AID TOTAL$ FUNDS FUNDS LOCAL FUNDS BID ROADWAY 3,888,166.96 3,393,729.21 3,390,54001 3,189.20 494,43775 494,437.75 DRAINAGE 25.0% Fo—unty,75.0% Centerville, 0.0%LlnoLakes) 506,030.09 126,507.52 126507.52 379,522.57 379,522.57 CONSTRUCTION TOTAL 4,394,197,05 3,520,236.73 3,517,047.53 3,189.20 673,960.32 873,960.32 8% CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING 351,535.76 281,618.94 281,618.94 255.14 691916.83 69,916.83 DESIGN ENGINEERING RIGHT OF WAY UTILITY RELOCATION PROJECT TOTAL 1 4,745,732.81 0,891.855.661 943;877.14 PRORATA ITEMS ,..;,.yw -�,m,. m• �q�m�_ m.m,.-w'�' �+-mp,.rmp.r+.,1, x,.....�,...-r+. , 5 � -r..np , o- W RATIO OF COLUMN SUBTOTAL VS. PROJECT SUBTOTAL 1.00 0 822 0.124000 0.001000 0.053000 (BOTH W/O MOBILIZATION, FIELD OFFICE, AND TRAFFIC CONTROL) DRAINAGE COST SPLITS % Countyl 25.0% 1 cEwrERvu.LEI 75.0% P \02621-10\1 d & Bdite Dake\e mMe\01-Sb10U_SFQ22 Cort Shen 25% ]5%ahu 01 11 PM W MW W P\02-621-10\Documents\goad&Bndge Genn\-imate\01-16-2014SEQ21_Cost Share259_75%1W 01/31/2020 292 PM 2 P \02.621-101 ad A "a De 4n\e40mate\01-26-2014_SEQ 21 Cast Sham 25%75%tlu r' EXHIBIT "F I•=60%Estmond Coat share = Oo51 Sheral0 Agreemem 01-17.2014. ITEM I REM NO DESCRIPTION UNIT 0' 01 pM ENGINEER'S ESTIMATI S' Bit Trail CSAH 21 (CENTERVILLE ROA STATE AID PARTICIPATING TOTAL UNIT PROJECT QUANTITY COUNTY OF ANOVA I CDYOFCENTERVILLE PRICE SAP 002021-010 SAP 002.821410 IN (B) Ic) QUANTITY AMOUNT QUANTITY AMOUNT QUANTITY AMOUNT QUANTITY FROM CSAH 34 (BIRCH ST.) TO CSAH 14 (MAIN ST.) STORM SEWER I NON -PARTICIPATING cauxrr OF AxDRA.25ox LOCAL 8Ap 002-071-010 CENTERYILLE•T50% COUNTY eAP 0a2aT1-0t0 COUNTYO CENTERVILLE CP 002$21.010 002-M-010O IP IOUNT QUANTITY I AMOUNT QUANTITY I AMOUNT I QUANTITY I AMOUNT SMM Funds A eN.W F.WJq Group C -w A I Gmp a Group C G—P D Group E %Fedwal Fund Tinel® 52,213,16753 E1,184,37035 $5EQ2R43 $228.648.75 Total Federal EllghAe Dema 82,213,15753 51,481,37035 5520,23843 $228.84875 Federal FUM, A.1WbM R—W W PRORATA ITEMS TOTAL'WIYHW ' 'IYPEO,A W RI1TW OF COLUMN SUBTOTAL V8. PROJECT SUBTOTAL BOTH Wb MOBILIIATION FELD OFFICE.AND TRAFFICI -,Izi10,1S733 1 11I.N0,181'JS - -114W085d3' ' ,111 , SF17.S3Bt3 10 066M 0 23M 0 1030D (G) IT Kris Sweeney From: Statz, Mark <Mark.Statz@stantec.com> • Sent: Thursday, April 20, 2017 9:24 AM To: Kris Sweeney Cc: Paul Palzer; Mike Ericson; Greg Burmeister Subject: RE: Final invoice for Centerville Road Attachments: SKM_C454e17041914050.pdf This makes a lot more sense. Greg and I have reviewed this and are in agreement that this is consistent with what we were expecting. From: Kris Sweeney(mailto:ksweeney@centervillemn.coml Sent: Thursday, April 20, 2017 9:19 AM To: Statz, Mark <Mark.Statz@stantec.com> Subject: Final invoice for Centerville Road Hi Mark Attached is a copy of the final invoice for Centerville Road. Please review this and let me know if it's ok to pay. Thanks, Kris This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service. For more information please visit http://www.amanteccloud.com 40 Mike Ericson OFrorn: Colvin, Kyle <kyle.colvin@metc.state.mn.us> Sent: Wednesday, April 05, 20171:06 PM To: Mike Ericson; Smith, Ned Cc: Paul Palzer; Charles Roberts; Smith, Ned; Atkins, John; Schueller, Dan Subject: RE: MCES Council Meeting Follow-up Mike, I apologize for not getting all the information that I committed getting to you sooner. I will attempt to respond to the bulleted items that I provided in my February 9 email and which is highlighted below: Unfortunately, we have not completed the 2018 cost/flow allocation process yet which includes flow generated in 2016. In order to re-create the 2017 cost/billings, we'll need to finalize the 2016 flow determination (at least the first half). We plan to compete the 2018 cost/flow allocations next week or the following week. We can then rerun the 2017 using the old flow period model for Centerville and compare how the switch of flow period impacted the City. • MCES keeps an operating reserve fund that has a minimum reserve balance requirement (10% of operating expenses excluding debt service cost). • At the end of 2016 we had some excess reserves as the balance was $19.2 million and the minimum balance requirement was $14.3 million. • The excess reserves are mainly used to decrease future Municipal Wastewater Charges. For example, for the 2018 budget that we are working on now, we may create a budget that has a deficit that is funded from reserves. In other words, the MWCs will be set lower than they otherwise would be. See table below. The list below ranks from High to Low the cost increase for the communities that experienced increases in their 2017 wastewater bills from the Council. It reflects those that had an 8% or higher increase. Centerville is located near the center of the list with an 11.62% increase. Most of the higher increases are attributable to growth that occurred within the community and many of those are smaller sewered areas. Thus growth had a greater impact. Communities that are listed in red text have 100% of their flow estimated based on connection counts and assumed flow per connection (Like the Lamont area in Lino Lakes) or other information submitted by the community. 41 • Hope this provides adequate information for two to the requested items. As soon as the 2016 flows have been finaliz we'll run through the impact comparison between the old 2017 allocation model and the new model. Please don't hesitate to call me with any questions, and again sorry for the delay in getting this to you. METPUTAN G 0 U N C I L Kyle Colvin Assistant Manager I Engineering Services Kyle.colvin .metc.state.mn.us P. 651.602.1151 1 F. 651.602.1083 390 North Robert Street I St. Paul, MN 155101 1 metrocouncil.org CONNECT WITH USS ; .. From: Mike Ericson[mailto:MEricson@CENTERVILLEMN.com] Sent: Friday, March 31, 2017 9:59 AM To: Colvin, Kyle <kyle.colvin@metc.state.mn.us>; Smith, Ned <Ned.Smith@metc.state.mn.us> Cc: Paul Palzer <PPalzer@CENTERVILLEMN.com>; Charles Roberts <CRoberts@CENTERVILLEMN.com> Subject: FW: MCES Council Meeting Follow-up Kyle... 42 FYI. Councilmember Montain is inquiring as to date for the MCES flow info. Could you please advise. Thanks. Best Regards, Mike lfflciutd'4 ' i�Icea7 VNIteiffe TAUARC77F We kOUn 04ACMJ COy A*r*WG►lor C*rdcw4wAftllaw molm ftew C*ftW 1J0ANi6,W38 P� (6511 i4241M P 1651)429-$629 From: Matthew Montain Sent: Friday, March 31, 2017 7:22 AM To: Mike Ericson <MEricson @CENTERVILLEMN.com> Subject: Re: MCES Council Meeting Follow-up It will be 2 months since the meeting we discussed these items at our meeting, do we have answers to their review of our bill? Thank you Matt 651-492-5979 On Feb 10, 2017, at 16:15, Mike Ericson <MEricson@CENTERVILLEMN.com> wrote: Thanks Matt.... I appreciate your review. I have shared them with Kyle. Again, thanks. 43 Mike From: Matthew Montain Sent: Friday, February 10, 2017 2:43 PM To: Mike Ericson <MEricson @CENTERVILLEMN.com> Subject: Re: MCES Council Meeting Follow-up FYI- Hopefully met council will see the months in question hurt our city financially. Not sure that will mean anything in the long run I do I feel it is wrong to charge for the same time period twice.... according to MN DNR website the following precip for those months- 2015 - June -Average May- Average to slightly above average April- below average March- drought conditions February- drought conditions January- Average I understand that if it was really wet we wouldn't be having this same conversation because it rates would have been lower but maybe we will catch a break..... Thank you enjoy the weekend Matt 651-492-5979 On Feb 10, 2017, at 08:48, Mike Ericson <MEricson PCE NTERVILLEMN.com> wrote: Mayor and Council.... FYI. Mike From: Colvin, Kyle [mailto:kvle.colvin@metc.state.mn.us] Sent: Thursday, February 09, 2017 4:03 PM To: Mike Ericson <MEricson @CENTERVI LLE MN.com> Subject: Council Meeting Follow-up Mike, I hope that last night's Council meeting achieved what you wanted it to. I felt that from the questions and discussions, the City Council members lacked the level of clarity that you and staff had at our meeting last week. I would appreciate it if you 4 44 could pass on my thanks to Mark Statz for clarifying some of the questions and providing some background. If there is anything else that I or the Metropolitan Council can do to assist you, please don't hesitate to call me. row f id �41WA'4 t�llii ng'is'fifiO" gf� of items that were . e u Sit e hl, • s _y c i?a t -#i � st from_ switching a i cid dor Summary of communities having large 2037 cost increases. Let me know if there is anything else that was requested. I'll start pulling this information together and get to you next week. Sincerely, <image001.jpg> Kyle Colvin Assistant Manager I Engineering Services Kvle.colvin(d)metc. state. m n.us P. 651.602.1151 i F. 651.602.1083 390 North Robert Street I St. Paul, MN 155101 1 metrocouncil.org <image002.gif><image003.gif><image004.gif><image005.gif> <image006.gif> This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service. For more information please visit http://www.sManteccloud.com This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service. For more information please visit http://www.symanteccloud.com 45 2017 MCES Customer Listening Session Metro Cities — Thursday, April 6 Golden Valley — Thursday, April 13 Agenda 8:45AM — 9:OOAM Networking/Light Refreshments METROPOLITAN N c Q U N C 1 L 9:OOAM — 9:45AM Introduction & MCES Overview — Ned Smith Customer Level of Service Capital Spending Overview MCES Budget Overview 9:45AM—10:OOAM 2018 Rate Information — Kyle Colvin 10:OOAM—10:45AM Breakouts 10:45AM—11:OOAM Recap 46 • ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES FACTS A national leader in environmental protection Clean water and a clean environment are essential to a healthy life, and the Metropolitan Council is committed to both. Our Environmental Services division (MCES) is nationally renowned for its superior work treating wastewater, monitoring air and water quality, and planning to ensure a long-range water supply to meet future demand. MCES consistently achieves near -perfect compliance with federal and state clean water discharge standards. At the same time, our rates are well below the national average for large agencies that treat more than 100 million gallons per day. MCES is a leader in sustainability. Between 2006 and 2015, the division reduced its purchases of fossil fuel energy by 23.6%. Council protects water quality, public health MCES is responsible for collecting and treating wastewater from 2.6 million residents in the seven -county Twin Cities area. MCES also conducts research related to surface water quality and water supply, and provides technical assistance to local governments. Among its primary responsibilities, MCES: • Maintains more than 600 miles of regional interceptor sewers that collect flow from more than 5,000 miles of sewers owned by 109 communities. • Processes an average of 250 million gallons of wastewater daily at 8 regional treatment plants. • Works with about 850 industrial clients to substantially reduce the amount of pollution entering the wastewater collection system. • Provides surface water quality monitoring and analysis for the region. • Conducts research and develops policies and plans related to the region's water supply. • Partners with numerous public, private and nonprofit groups committed to a clean environment. Council supports regional growth MCES services protect public health and the environment while supporting regional growth. Guided by the Council's long-range plan, Thrive MSP 2040, MCES ensures that: • Sufficient sewer capacity exists to serve planned development. • Sufficient capital investments are made to preserve water quality in the region. • Wastewater collection and treatment is competitive for cost and quality. • Local plans provide for adequate water supply and prevention of pollution from nonpoint sources, such as urban and agricultural stormwater runoff. MCES plants maintain outstanding environmental record The Council's wastewater treatment plants continue to perform at a high level, achieving near -perfect compliance with federal and state clean water discharge 04-2017 1 www.metrocouncil.org C 0 U N C I L 47 permits. Two plants—Hastings and St. Croix Valley—are among the top 10 plants in the country Between 2006 and for consecutive years of full compliance with their permits (25 and 24 years, respectively). 2015, the division reduced its purchases Service is responsive of fossil fuel energy MCES works with and for citizens in a number of ways, including partnering on environmental by 23.6%. improvement efforts and addressing process -related and industrial odor -control issues. Staff also reach out to the public with educational programs, public meetings, forums, surveys, and newsletters. Council coordinates water supply planning In 2005, the Minnesota Legislature directed the Council to carry out planning activities addressing the water supply needs of the seven -county metro area. The law requires the Council to maintain a base of technical information upon which to make sound decisions about water supply issues, and to develop a regional master plan for water supply. After years of study and regional input, and with assistance from state and local officials on the Metropolitan Water Supply Advisory Committee, the Council developed its first Master Water Supply Plan in 2010. The plan emphasizes conservation, inter -jurisdictional cooperation and long-term sustainability. The Council adopted an updated Master Water Supply Plan in September 2015. Council monitors regional water quality MCES implements a variety of strategies to meet its mission of "providing wastewater services and integrated planning to ensure sustainable water quality and water supply for the region." MCES monitors and analyzes the water quality of the region's lakes and rivers; partners with public, private and nonprofit groups to improve water quality; and assists with watershed planning and management. The division's work is guided by the 2040 Water Resources Management Policy Plan, a chapter of the Metropolitan Development Guide (of which Thrive MSP 2040 is the foundation). The updated policy plan embraces an integrated approach to water supply, water quality, and wastewater treatment; it also emphasizes collaboration with local government, state, and other partners. Long-range plans include significant energy savings MCES implements an ongoing capital improvement program to maintain and improve the region's wastewater infrastructure, support regional growth, and meet regulatory requirements. The 2016 capital expense budget is $190 million. The budget supports projects at the eight treatment plants as well as numerous interceptor, lift station, and meter station construction and rehabilitation projects. MCES is working hard to reduce energy consumption at its facilities. Working with Xcel Energy, MCES completed more than three dozen energy -savings projects between 2006 and 2015, with estimated current savings of more than $4 million per year. Between 2006 and 2015, MCES reduced its purchase of fossil -fuel energy by 23.6%, and plans to reduce it an additional 10% by 2020. 48 Metropolitan Council 390 Robert Street North Saint Paul, MN 55101 Main: 651.602.1000 TTY: 651.291.0904 Public Information: 651.602.1500 public.info@metc. state. mn.us MCES REGIONAL MUNICIPAL WASTEWATER CHARGE MCES protects public health and the environment Metropolitan Council Environmental Services (MCES) operates the metropolitan disposal system (regional wastewater collection and treatment system), serving 109 communities and 2.6 million people in the seven -county metro area. The system includes: • More than 600 miles of regional interceptor sewers that collect wastewater from more than 5,000 miles of locally owned sewers. • 8 regional wastewater treatment plants. • 61 lift stations to pump the wastewater as needed. • 206 metering stations to measure wastewater flow. The flow data is combined with other data to determine each community's share of MCES's annual municipal wastewater charge. What is the Municipal Wastewater Charge (MWC)? This fee is billed to each community served by the metropolitan disposal system for its portion of regional wastewater operation costs. The MWC is approximately 78% of the total annual MCES operating budget. Approximately 15% of the budget comes from a transfer from the Sewer Availability Charge (SAC) Fund; about 7% comes from industrial waste charges and other revenue. MCES Wastewater Revenue, 2017 5.1% 2.1% How does MCES determine each community's share of the annual MWC? Municipal Wastewater Charges $211 9 million Sewer Availability Charge Fund Transfer $39.4 million Industrial Charges $13.8 million Other $5 8 million After we develop our annual operating budget, we allocate to each of our 109 customer communities a portion of the total regional municipal wastewater charge based on the volume of wastewater that we collect and treat from each community. For the 2018 operating budget, we calculate each community's percentage of the region's total wastewater flow from the year 2016, and that percentage will determine the community's share of the 2018 MWC. For example, if a community contributed 5% of the total regional wastewater flow in 2016, it will pay 5% of the 2018 total regional MWC. All communities pay for a percentage of the MWC that is equal to their percentage of the total regional wastewater flow. MCES collects this municipal wastewater charge through 12 equal monthly invoices. Community Share of Total Regional Wastewater Flow What is influencing MCES's budget and annual increases? Com'nunity Share of MCES Municipal Wastewater Charge Our biggest budget driver is debt service, which accounts for 46% of the budget. We continue to pay off bonds that financed wastewater system upgrades and capacity improvements over the last 20 years. Moving forward, we will invest approximately 90% of the current capital Improvement program in asset preservation, primarily to address aging infrastructure in the wastewater collection system and the treatment plants. 04-2017 1 www.metrocouncil.org 49 METROPOLITAN C O U N C I L We take a comprehensive approach for evaluating the condition of the system, and a purposeful, rational plan over multiple years to rehabilitate or replace the most -deteriorated facilities first. This long-range planning is aimed at maintaining consistent and predictable wastewater rates, so communities can plan for their share of costs. While debt service, labor, and operation and maintenance costs continue to put pressure on the budget, MCES remains a national model among large regional wastewater systems. Our rates are well below the national average for large agencies that treat more than 100 million gallons per day. What impacts a community's total MWC from year to year? • Overall MCES budget • Community's total flow volume • Total regional flow volume and community's relative share of the total How do wet -weather cycles impact a community's MWC? Communities with high inflow and infiltration (I/I) of clear water into sanitary sewers will have increased wastewater flows, which could result in paying a greater portion of the MWC. As communities act to reduce VI, their share of the region's total wastewater flow will shift. Even a community that does not contribute excessive I/1 and has stable flow from year to year may see a shift in its share of the MWC as other communities reduce their share of the overall flow. What is the annual budget schedule? January -April: Operating budget is developed and rates and charges are proposed Early May: Metropolitan Council Environment Committee direction for public meetings Late May/June: Municipal customer forums Early July: Environment Committee review of customer input and recommended rates and charges Late July: Council approval of municipal wastewater charge and other rates Late August: Council adoption of preliminary operating budget December: Council adoption of final budget and levies For more information about the MCES budgeting process, contact Ned Smith, Finance & Revenue Director, at Ned. Smith@metc.state.mn.us, or visit the following links: 2017 Municipal Wastewater Charges (by community): httas:llmetrocouncil.org/Wastewater- Wa ter/Fundino-Finance/Finance-Pubs/2017-Municipal-Wastewater-Charges. aspx Wastewater Finance Facts: https:llmetrocouncii.oMlAbout-Us/Factsl Wastewater-WaterF/Wastewater-Finance-Facts. aspx MCES Funding & Finance Overview: haps://metrocouncil.ora1 Wastewater-Water/Fundina-Finance.aspx 50 Our wastewater collection and treatment rates are well below the national average for large agencies that treat more than 100 million gallons per day. Metropolitan Council 90 Robert Street North Saint Paul, MN 55101 Main: 651.602.1000 TTY: 651.291.0904 nation: 651.602.1500 rfo@ m etc. state. m n. us INFLOW AND INFILTRATION FACTS Inflow and Infiltration - or 1/1 - are terms that describe clear water that enters wastewater collection systems and consumes capacity of the conveyance and treatment systems. Excessive flows can result in public and environmental health concerns if untreated sewage discharges to basements, rivers, or lakes. Each has unique sources, methods of entry, and effects on the wastewater collection system. Both are costly to communities and utility ratepayers due to increased conveyance and treatment costs. Inflow is typically stormwater that increases peak flow in the wastewater system during and after rainfall events from point sources such as broken manhole covers, sewer cleanouts, sump pumps, foundation drains, and rain leaders. Infiltration is typically groundwater that gradually enters the wastewater system through cracks and openings in sewer mains, service laterals, joints, and deteriorated manholes. Infiltration increases base flow in the wastewater system and removes water from the natural hydrologic cycle, which could otherwise recharge the regional aquifers. Regional Ongoing 1/1 Mitigation Program The Met Council has convened multiple community-based task force committees since ?003 which developed the Ongoing 1/1 Mitigation Program. The program goals include: • Protect public and environmental health by preventing untreated sewage discharges to basements and the environment • Minimize regional and local cost to convey and treat excessive 1/I • Ensure the vitality and sustainability of the regional water resources Success of mitigation Property owners, local community, and Met Council efforts related to 1/1 mitigation and water conservation have contributed to wastewater flow reduction across the region. • The annual regional wastewater flow has been reduced by roughly nine billion gallons per year since 2005. The flow decrease has occurred even as precipitation volumes, rainfall intensities, and populations have increased. • Two significant rainfall events occurred in October 2005 and June 2014. The 2014 rainfall event included higher precipitation and higher soil moisture, with lower peak flows recorded at the Metro and Blue Lake wastewater treatment plants when compared to the 2005 rainfall event. What can property owners do to mitigate 1/1? • Disconnect unlawful connections to the sanitary sewer system. Residents should contact the local Public Works department to help find reasonable alternatives. 11-2016 I www.metrocouncil.org METROPOLITANC O U N C I L 51 • Be familiar with the plumbing system in the home or business. If roof downspouts are piped underground, a sump pump has no identifiable discharge point, or founda- tion drains don't discharge to the street curb or gutter or other low point on the lot, there may be sources of 1/1 on the property that are contributing to the problem. • Have the private sewer service lateral inspected and, if necessary, repaired. What are local communities and the Met Council doing to mitigate UI? • Communities in the region have been working for years to mitigate 1/1 sources. Between 2007 and 2015, regional communities reported investments of over $157 M in 1/1 mitigation projects. • Communities and property owners offset 1/1 mitigation expenses using grants. The Minnesota Legislature - with advocacy of Metro Cities - has allocated a total of $10.5 M of grant funding to help communities mitigate 1/1. Minnesota's Legacy Clean Water Fund also contributed $1 M to support roughly $3.3 M in investments. • MCES invested roughly $88 M on 1/1 mitigation activities from 2007-2015 and plans to invest about $80 million to $100 million annually in interceptor -related investments through year 2023. • Completed comprehensive analyses of the sewer systems to locate 1/1 sources. Many communities have developed strategies to mitigate 1/1 as part of comprehensive master plans and capital improvement projects. • MCES hosted 1/1 mitigation workshops and created public outreach videos. Additional resources are available at http://metrocouncil.org/Wastewater-Water/Funding-Finance/ Rates-Charges/MCES-Inflow-and-Infiltration-fl-l)-Program.aspx More information For IA program questions, please contact: Marcus gush, PE 651.602.1166 Marcus.Bush@metc.state.mn.us Jeannine Clancy 651.602.1210 Jeannine.Clancy@metc.state.mn.us For financial and grant questions, please contact: Matt Gsellmeier 651.602.1802 Matthew.Gselimeier@metc.state.mn.us 52 Excessive 1/1 can cause sewage overflows into area lakes and rivers, and sewage backups into homes and businesses. Metropolitan Counal t0 Robert Street North Saint Paul, MN 55101 Main: 651.602.1000 TTY: 651.291 0904 iation: 651.602.1500 fo@metc.state mn.us What is Inflow and Infiltration? INFLOW AND INFILTRATION (1/1) Inflow and infiltration are the ways that clear water makes its VIVLtIVlr-N IE ar Reducing Infloi PrvPd by the RPni Maintain and rehabilitate Council interceptors. Limit service expansion where excessive inflow & infiltration risks overifow & backups. MIA Institute a rate demand charge for ,communities who dont i;riieet their inflow & infiltration goals. Require communities to include inflow & infiltration mitigation in comprehensive _sewer plans, __ including private sources. Include cost of the wastewater storage or improvements required to avoid overloading system in demand charge. Develop program to help communities reduce inflow,& infiltration from private :sources. 10 Work with the State to promote statutes, rules, and regulation to encourage inflow & infiltration x..: mitigation. Require communities to include inflow & infiltration mitigation in comprehensive _sewer plans, __ including private sources. Include cost of the wastewater storage or improvements required to avoid overloading system in demand charge. Develop program to help communities reduce inflow,& infiltration from private :sources. 10 Inflow and infiltration is that component of sanitary sewage flow that originates from clear water connections, e.g., sump pumps and foundation drains, stormwater entering manholes and groundwater entering through pipe joints and cracks. It is water that would normally not require any type of treatment. However, once it is co -mingled with sanitary wastewater it cannot be separated, and must be treated with the sanitary wastewater. `;si INFILTRATION The seepage of groundwater into sewer pipes through cracks or joints in the pipes. Q INFLOW Inflow is typically flow from a single point, such as discharge from sump pumps, foundation drains, and rain leaders or storm water entering openings in the sewer access covers. 4D VI GOAL The 1/1 goal is the maximum allowed peak hourly flow limit for each metershed; product of the previous ten-year growth adjusted average daily flow and the standard peaking factor adopted by the Metropolitan Council. Q DEMAND CHARGE A demand charge is the amount that MCES may charge a community for the cost of excess capacity needed in the MDS for those communities that have not met their inflow and infiltration goals(s), if the community has not been implementing an effective 1/1 reduction program in the determination of the Council, or if regulations and/or regulatory permits require MCES action to ensure regulatory compliance. The charge is not a penalty; it will include the cost of wastewater storage facilities and/or other improvements necessary to avoid overloading MCES conveyance and treatment facilities (plus the appropriate service availability charges for use of MCES conveyance and treatment facilities). 54 © EXCESS VI 1/1 that results in wet weather flows that exceed MCES' established 1/1 goal for the metershed, adjusted, where appropriate, for 1/1 into MCES interceptors. 18 EXCESSIVE VI EVENT A wet weather time period when excessive 1/1 occurs within the MDS. EXCEEDANCE PEAK HOUR FLOW (PHF) A meter's peak hour flow that exceeds the metershed's 1/1 goal, adjusted, if applicable, for 1/1 into MCES interceptors. Q EXCEEDANCE RATE The charge per mgd of excessive 1/1. STANDARD PEAKING FACTOR A factor which is multiplied by the average daily flow for a metershed to determine the maximum allowable 1/I. Q MDS Metropolitan Disposal System; wastewater facilities owned and operated by the Metropolitan Council. 10 MGD Million gallons per day METERSHED The area tributary to an MCES flow meter. Some communities have multiple metersheds. Q MWC Municipal Wastewater Charge What is SAC? SAC is an easier way to say Sewer Availability Charge. The Metropolitan Council charges this one-time fee when a residence or business connects to the regional wastewater (sewer) system for the first time. The Council may also charge SAC when a business grows or changes the use of its space, which may create more potential demand on the system. The Council charges SAC to local governments, who pass it on to business or property owners. Some local governments also charge an additional fee. You will pay any SAC owed to your local government. Why do I have to pay SAC? extra 1-1 Wastewater pipes and treatment plants are expensive. We borrow money to build them large enough to serve current AND future customers. SAC helps pay off the debt. How does the Council determine the SAC I will pay? SAC is charged in units. One single-family home = 1 SAC unit = $2,485 (2016-2017) Non-residential properties require a "determination" (calculation) of the amount of maximum potential wastewater capacity needed for the site. Depending on your business, you could pay more than one SAC unit. For example, a restaurant without a bar will pay 1 SAC for every 10 seats. SAC is determined based on the maximum potential wastewater flow created by the activities at the location (food preparation, dishwashing, floor cleaning, manufacturing, restroom use, etc.) Let's say you buy or open a business that is similar in kind and size to what existed in the same space before. If SAC was paid, you may not be charged additional SAC. Before signing a lease, contact the Council to see if there are SAC credits on the site and how to submit for a determination. Visit metrocouncil.org/SACmanual for guidance on how much SAC you might pay. 55 • j 66 II How do ! submit for a SAC determination? Metropolitan Council or local Pay any SAC owed to Local government will then government calculates local government. issue permit/license, report the amount of SAC owed. SAC determination and pay Local government may add local fees to the SAC SAC to Metropolitan Council. 66 Metropolitan Council staff will contact you within one business day after receiving your application materials to confirm whether the materials are complete or not. The Council can usually complete a determination in two to three weeks once it receives all the necessary forms and documents. You pay any SAC owed to your local government, usually as part of a permit or business license. Are payment options available? If you cannot afford to pay your SAC fee to your local government: • You may be able to get a small business loan to spread out the cost of SAC and other local government fees. Check with your local bank or lending agent. Your local government may also be able to delay a portion of your SAC fee. Ask your local government if they participate in the SAC Deferral Program. Questions? Email SACprogram@metc.state.mn.us or call 651-602-1770 to speak with a SAC representative. METROPOLITAN C O U N C 1 L 56 Go to local government Visit metrocouncil.org/SACforms Complete application materials for permit/license. to get SAC application and submit to and other forms. SACprogram@metc.state.mn.us. `� _ _ _ 'zea'_ ..�#%. -'_ �.'-sY'ki .._ �. -__k. ✓.F -.: •_}:<°'S -=: �'��it`��'-, _-_ ,r vTy�:y-�. ���. ".'a - _ �_s''�l""�'-�e4•. � -Y'"""�. a.. .fr`jl.`��`aL�.'_-�: ��,c�.`^'e;.`�'L: :dl'-f'�-��'t3 ::�:�#t'r�.`;i�:-. Metropolitan Council or local Pay any SAC owed to Local government will then government calculates local government. issue permit/license, report the amount of SAC owed. SAC determination and pay Local government may add local fees to the SAC SAC to Metropolitan Council. 66 Metropolitan Council staff will contact you within one business day after receiving your application materials to confirm whether the materials are complete or not. The Council can usually complete a determination in two to three weeks once it receives all the necessary forms and documents. You pay any SAC owed to your local government, usually as part of a permit or business license. Are payment options available? If you cannot afford to pay your SAC fee to your local government: • You may be able to get a small business loan to spread out the cost of SAC and other local government fees. Check with your local bank or lending agent. Your local government may also be able to delay a portion of your SAC fee. Ask your local government if they participate in the SAC Deferral Program. Questions? Email SACprogram@metc.state.mn.us or call 651-602-1770 to speak with a SAC representative. METROPOLITAN C O U N C 1 L 56 City of Plymouth 2017 MWC Determination Plymouth Cost Allocation Year Metered Flow: 2,235.20 million gallons (MG). Plymouth Cost Allocation Year Unmetered Flow: 43.36 MG. Depending on the total generation rate per connection count (where applicable) can very between 60,000 4 on historical community responses to wet weather, age of services and other ava in 2015 was 36.14 inches, which was above the 30 -year average of 30.61 inches. T below. precipitation, the assigned wastewater 00,000 gallons/year/REC. This rate is based data. The total "water equivalent precipitation" Lesuafin assigned the generation rates City Flowin7To Calculation w (MG) Note b: Source Wayzata 30 REC x 100,000 gpy ", -r 3• (75 REC x 100,000 gpy) + 10,230,000 comm{ 90,00 I 19'1 and institutional umes Minnetonka inst. are based oln ester use records submitted by the City of Plymouth Maple Grove 217 REC x 100,000 gpy 21.70 TOTAL ADDS 43.82 City Flowing From Calculation aw' Flow (MG) Notes Re: Source Minnetonka 1 REC x 80,000 gpy x'?.'' t -0.08 Medicine lake (2 SFU + 1 Comm.) x 100,0001 t ' 3 REC x 10r7;0�Or /365 x 1 'OF . eken -0.38 3 REC @100 days for catering hall TOTAL DEDUO'(`S'',''�*, t -0.46 Y: <` Total: 43.36 4 �{ For the 2017 Cost Allocaf ii Year, the totgi:re�d 1 flo ,> s 85.298.36 MG. The 2017 Metropolitan Wgite Ater-Ghar.,ge toy allocated was $211.941.538. The City's 2017 Flow Allocation was 2,271856 IN' which represents 2.671282% of the total regional flow. Therefore, the City's 2017 Annual Charge was $5,661.556.81, or 2.674282% of $211,941,538. The City's 2017 Annual Charge reprei` a 7.26% increase from the 2016 Annual Charge. It should be noted that this percentage incorporates an overall budget increase of 5.4%. City of Plymouth MCES Facilities - ® Meters Metershed Gravity 3 M117 Interceptor M118 -_ ---- Forcemain M120 M226 4/5/2017 58 M241 M242 (— M410 M428 M437A/B Unmetered MEROPITAN 4/5/2017 Purpose • To discuss MCES's Customer Level of Service and Customer Service Improvement Plan To listen to our customers' feedback and additional suggestions to improve communication, collaboration and service 59 MCES Our Customers N1110 1 4/5/2017 . . • airawil r ate - ,1 tV Customer Level of Servl;ce • Financial • Predictable & justifiable rates • Fair, equitable, and transparent cost allocation • Well-maintained assets 2 60 Customer Level of Service Public Health, Safety, and Environmental Protection • Consistent Permit compliance • Minimal backups and spills • Lead by example on sustainability Customer Level of Service • Customer Service • Be a good neighbor • Provide planned capacity • Communicate & coordinate • Engage customers • Be a valued partner 61 1 B$ 4/5/2017 3 4/5/2017 What We Heard Last Year... • We need Fact Sheets to help us We need regular communication and communicate: collaboration: • SAC • Capital Program • Wastewater Charges / Cost Allocation • Coordination of Utility & Road Work • Inflow / Infiltration • Good Neighbor Issues (e.g., odors, etc.) • MCES Services • Flow Allocation Charges • We need easy, online access to • 1/1 Program information: • SAC Program • Flow (1/1 Programs & Cost Allocations) TT • Maps • Explanation of Bills & Rates • Capital Projects • Industrial Waste Online Reporting Customr a VI • . Improvement . E' # EN WHAT Wfi Faire ee,. Budget Workshops with Customers May/June, 2017 Online Customer Access to information Spring, 2018. - Independent MCES Customer Service Evaluation Summer, 2018 n 62 3970-2030 • Upgrade Treatment Plants Built Interceptor System 2011-2040 • Asset Preservation 10 4?16 mr— F P( L1-iAN 1 a 1 City Storm^. atei Pipe 7fix& 3970-2030 • Upgrade Treatment Plants Built Interceptor System 2011-2040 • Asset Preservation 10 4?16 mr— F P( L1-iAN 1 a 1 City Storm^. atei Pipe MCES Sewer Interceptor' 3970-2030 • Upgrade Treatment Plants Built Interceptor System 2011-2040 • Asset Preservation 10 4?16 mr— F P( L1-iAN 1 a 1 4/5/2017 MCES Cap!tal Program ASSET PRESERVATION 100 2 1.8 I 90 1.6 a 1.4 80 F 12 S o 1 m C a 70 08 0.6 w 0 60 0.4 i 0.2 50 0 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 ■n Capital Expense (% of Total) —Asset Preservation Index (% of Est. Replacement Value) 64 I me rce pto r � MCES Treatment Plants Project Under Design Project Under Construction Project Start Next 5 Years MCES Interceptor 13 4/5/2017 E'Fa1°°1O4'T4". Deka Service History • Upgraded Metropolitan Plant and expanded Empire Plant in 2003-2005 • Debt service was structured to have principal repaid in later years in effort to smooth rate increases • Interceptor renewal has been accelerated since 2013 to ensure reliable service 7 65 MCES Capital Program 4/5/2017 • Mitigation of Debt Service Increases: $895 Million • How? • Slow pace of Interceptor System Asset Renewal • Take advantage of recent bids lower than budgeted $760 Million 2027 Uses by Category Materials, Supplies & Chemicals 6% Consulting Interdivisional Services Contractual 6% 8% Salaries & F Rent & Utilities Benefits 6% 23% Other D' S% •% L 66 Cost Control • Asset Management • Continuous Improvement • Work Force Development Cost Control: Labor MCES Full Time Employees 2002 - 2017 780 760 754 740 732 719 720 698 696 700 680 660 640 620 600 580 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 694 695 695 694 670 676 671 660 651 654 656 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 67 4/5/2017 Revenue Sources Industrial Charg 5% s 15% 4/5/2017 Municipal Wastewater Charges • MCES charges communities a wholesale fee for annual volume • Firm Flow allocation method • Communities pay portion of MWC corresponding to their percent of total flow • 2018 billings based on percent of 2016 flow *Communities charge businesses and residents a retail fee for sewer volume • Communities incorporate the MCES fee into their own utility fees. • On average, the MWC represents approximately 60% of the system average retail sewer fee. 10 68 4/5/2017 MWC: City Flow Can Impact City Increases "City ASC 16, 11.68% 10,000 11.72% city XYZ 500 .58% 550 .64% City 123 1230 1.25% 1100 All Others 75,100 86.47% 74,750 86.52% • A community's change in percentage of the total is what will determine their rate increase. • Le., a community who maintains flow while the total system flow increases will see a smaller rate increase (City ABC) • A community who increases flow will see a larger rate increase (City XYZ) • A community who reduces flow will see a smaller rate increase (City 123) _ 5.4% Increase • 5-7% Increase • - • (Due to Debt Service Pressure) • <4% Increase < Inflation Rate NAE -1 110POLF1 AN c 11 69 4/5/20i7 Sewer Availability Charge (SAC) allows MCES to build for the future, & charge in the future • MCES builds pipes in anticipation of future growth, but distributes the cost over time and generations. • SAC future -proofs our system, allowing all communities to grow #: 2042 What was built in 1982 1982 What was paid for in 1982 2012 What was paid for in 2012 SAC serves the community • Acts as a savings program: capacity built up front, users only pay when additional capacity is needed • Promotes regional growth: development can occur anywhere in the region • Frequent meetings with stakeholders to verify the program serves its constituents 1992 2002 2012 2022 2032 i 12 70 SAC Information 4/5/2017 • Charged to municipalities (wholesale) • Revenue reduces volume charge to cities • For new connections or increased demand (available capacity) • 1 SAC unit charged per 274 gallons of maximum daily wastewater flow availability • Availability # Treatment Service _ "Capacity we stand ready to serve" Historical SAC Rate Increases (%) 14% 12% 10%9.0% 9.6% 8% 7.4% 0 6% 6.9% 5 9% 6.2% 4% 4.3% 5.0% 2% 3.0% 2.1% 0% 0% 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 13 71 4/5/2017 SAC Units: Recovering 25,000 21,150 20,542 20,000 19,334 18,096 18,427 17,052 15,000 15,193 14,303 5,663 14,589 10,392 10,000 81304 9,817 5,000 0 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Task Force Updates - SAC • Cross functional, cross regional team • 14 members: finance, public works, city managers, building officials, restaurants, medium business • Chaired by Met Council Member Wendy Wulff • Co -facilitated with MetroCities • 4 Focus areas • SAC for Outdoor Seating • SAC for Manufactured Homes • Improving SAC determinations • Improving SAC credit process 14 72 4/5/2017 Task Force Updates — Inflow and Infiltration Program • Cross -discipline, multi -community team • 20 members: finance, public works, city managers • Chaired by Met Council Member, Environmental Committee Chair Sandy Rummel • Co -facilitated with MetroCities • Assignment • Review existing program and system responses to wet weather • Discuss challenges of private property 1/1 mitigation • Identify opportunities for private property 1/1 mitigation • Develop recommendations for MCES to implement • public outreach program • technical resources • financial resources Task Force Updates - wastewater. Reuse • Cross functional, cross regional team • 14 members: finance, public works, city managers, building officials, restaurants, medium business • Chaired by Met Council Member, Environmental Committee Chair Sandy Rummel • Co -facilitated with MetroCities • 4 Focus areas • Review Council's policies for wastewater reuse • Discuss regional benefit of wastewater reuse • Discuss rate structure • Discuss partnership opportunities with communities 15 73 Watch in May for... 2018 Rate Setting Schedule • April 6 & 13: Customer Listening sessions • April 27: Industrial Waste Customer Forum • May 9: Environment Committee Direction for Public Meetings • Municipal Customer Forums* • May 23: Minnetonka Community Center • June 8: Metro Cities St. Croix Room • July 11: Environment Committee Review of Customer Input & 2018 Rate Adoption Recommendation • July 26: Council Rate Adoption • Aug. 23: Council Preliminary Operating Budget Adoption * public input 74 4/5/2017 16 P 1. What can be done to more clearly explain {ACES services and fees? 2. What are your primary customer concerns? 75 4/5/2017 17 4/5/2017 W 76 TO: Honorable Mayor and Council Members FROM: Staff SUBJECT: 6867 — 2e Avenue South — Encroachment Agreement DATE: February 2, 2017 The applicant has submitted all necessary applications, drawings and fees applicable. The Building Official has reviewed said Encroachment Agreement and signed off on the installation/construction of the fence. 77 Greg Burmeister From: Jon Olson <jonmolson@olsonsinthepink.com> Sent: Tuesday, May 02, 2017 9:23 AM To: Greg Burmeister Subject: 1688 Heritage Street Good Morning Greg! Greg the cost to remove up to 30' of 18" RCP, bulk head the ends, backfill, and compact excavated soil, and top the area with up to 16.5 tons of class 5 recycle. The cost is $3,757.00. Thanks Again for the opportunity to bid on this project! Have a great day! Jon This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service. For more information please visit http://www.symanteccloud.com �T I�a'.4 1 78 1693 tientage St Or to.. l I Memorandum To: Mike Ericson, Hon. Mayor Jeff Paar & Honorable City Council Members From: Charles Roberts Date: 4/26/2017 Re: Meeting times Summary: I was asked to research and compile a list of the meeting times of every City Council and their equivalent Park and Recreation Board in Anoka County and the surrounding area. My findings are below: Findings: From the list below: 11 City Councils meet on Mondays, 7 meet on Tuesdays, 3 meet on Thursdays, 2 meet on Wednesdays and 0 meet on Fridays. • Andover: o CC: 1St & 3rd Tuesday, 7:OOpm o P&R: I"& 3rd Thursday, 7:00pm • Anoka: o CC: 1St & 3rd Monday at 7:00 p.m. Work sessions: 0 Monday at 5:00 p.m o P&R: 3rd Tuesday, 7:00pm • City of Bethel: o CC: l st & 3rd Thursday, 7:OOpm o P&R: N/A (They do not have a Park Board/Commission) • City of Blaine: o CC: 1st & 3rd Thursday at 7:30 PM, Work sessions: 1st, 2nd and 3rd Thursdays at 6:30 PM o P&R: 4th Tuesday, 7:00pm • City of Circle Pines: o CC: 2nd & 4th Tuesday, 7:00pm o P&R: 1St Tuesday, 6:30pm • City of Columbus: o CC: 2nd & 4th Wednesday, 7:00pm o P&R: Yd Thursday, 6:30pm 1 81 April 26, 2017 • City of Columbia Heights: o CC: 2nd & 4th Monday, 7:00pm o P&R: 4th Wednesday, 5:30pm • City of Coon Rapids: o CC: 1st & 3rd Tuesdays, 7:00pm o P&R: 2nd Monday (except December), 6:30pm • City of East Bethel: o CC: I"& 3rd Wednesday, 7:00pm o P&R: 2nd Wednesday, 6:30pm • City of Fridley: o CC: 2nd & 4th Mondays, 7:00pm o P&R: 1St OR 2nd Monday, 7:00pm • City of Ham Lake: o CC: 1s'& 3rd Monday, 6:00pm o P&R: 3rd Wednesday. 6:00pm • City of Hilltop: o CC: 1St & 3rd, Monday 7:00pm o P&R: N/A • City of Lexington: o CC: 1St & 3rd Thursday, 7:00pm o P&R: 1St Monday, 6:30pm • City of Lino Lakes: o CC: 2nd & 4th Monday, 6:30pm o P&R: 1St Monday, 6:30pm • Township of Linwood: o CC: 2nd & 4th Tuesday, 6:00pm o P&R: 4th Monday, 6:00pm • City of Nowthen: o CC: 2nd Tuesday, 7:00pm o P&R: 1St Tuesday, 7:00pm • City of Oak Grove: o CC: 2nd & Last Monday, 7:00pm o P&R: 3rd Wednesday, 6:30pm • City of Ramsey: o CC: 2n & 4th Tuesday, 7:00pm o P&R: 2nd Tuesday, 6:30pm • City of St. Francis: o CC: 1St & 3rd Monday, 6:00pm o P&R: N/A (They do not have a Park Board/Commission) • City of Spring Lake Park: o CC: 1St & 3rd Mondays, 7:00pm o P&R: lst Tuesday, 6:30pm K 82 Nearby Cities: City of Hugo: o CC: I"& 3rd Monday, 7:00pm o P&R: 3rd Wednesday, 7:00pm City of White Bear: o CC: 2nd & 4th Tuesday, 7:00pm o P&R: 3rd Thursday, 6:30pm City of Forest Lake: o CC: 2nd & 4th Monday, 7:00pm o P&R: 3rd Tuesday, 5:00pm 83 April 26, 2017 Churches and families making Wednesdays the new Sunday - StarTri... http://www.starttibune.com/for-many-overbooked-christian-families-... VARIETY For many overbooked Christian families, Wednesday is the new Sunday As churches across Minnesota try new ways to accommodate the hectic lives of the faithful, Wednesday night services have emerged as a popular option. By Jean Hopfensperger Star Tribune , APRIL 26, 2017 — 10:52AM Each Wednesday, the Latzke family heads to their Bloomington church for an evening of religious education and a worship service. Sunday is too packed to squeeze in church, so now Wednesday is their day — as it is for thousands of busy Minnesotans. "Wednesday is the new Sunday," is what some clergy call this trend reflecting the scheduling quirks of modern families. 'This works really nice for us because we're so busy on weekends," said Robyn Latzke shortly before the service at Transfiguration Lutheran Church. "She dances, and she plays volleyball," Latzke said, pointing to her daughters. "And I farm on weekends with my brother," added her husband, Jeff Latzke. As churches across Minnesota try new ways to accommodate the hectic lives of the faithful, Wednesday night services have emerged as a popular option. For churches that already offered religious education on Wednesdays, adding a worship service was a logical fit. For others, a Wednesday service helps folks who travel on weekends, hold down jobs, or schlep children to hockey, soccer and other events. "The on -demand culture has affected church people as much as society," said Scott Thumma, director of the Hartford Institute for Religion Research. Keeping folks in regular attendance is critical, as irregular churchgoing often fizzles into no churchgoing, Thumma said. Mainline Protestants, those most avidly embracing Wednesdays, have seen a steady decline in attendance. Median weekend attendance at U.S. churches, for example, dropped from 129 people to 80 from 2005 to 2015, according to the institute. The study advised: `To grow, distinguish yourself from other congregations." Food and faith Wednesday nights at Transfiguration are much like those at other churches, starting with a meal, then worship, then religious education. Sue O'Reilly is among the regulars. The nurse was among those seated at tables in the social hall, enjoying lasagna and a salad. "I'm a busy weekender, going to the cabin, sometimes working," said O'Reilly. "Coming on Wednesday, I get a full church service. "If I had a bad day at work, I like to come here," she added. "It just kind of settles you." The Rev. Ed Treat said the church was targeting adults like O'Reilly as well as teens when it began the Wednesday "Oasis" in 2015. "We were trying to solve the problem of getting kids to church on a Sunday morning," said Treat. "We were teaching them confirmation, but they never came to worship." The service now is one of the most popular, he said. "People are starting to see it as their own service," Treat said. Abby Titus, a seventh -grader sitting with O'Reilly, appreciates the night. Said Titus: "It's kind of like a break from sports and homework and from the rest of the world." fbU5L/Y493V0M0WMWdW.com/images /1493179262_100699[ 1 ffi6liT&. ) The choir sang durineh1%fi3NgMf%WR TRIBUNE >Tbliir6AOBN i►�,alrfi46�W�iJe a (http://stmedia.startribune.com/images /ows_149317344373269.jpg) CARLOS GONZALEZ - STAR TRIBUNE Laura Landini,14, received communion at Transfiguration Lutheran Church in Bloomington during a Wednesday service. 1 of 3 84 4/26/17, 4:03 P1v Churches and families making Wednesdays the new Sunday - StarTri... http://www.startribune.com/for-many-overbooked-christian-families-... Courting families Churches began experimenting with Wednesdays about a decade ago. It has steadily grown since then. Pioneers included Prince of Peace Lutheran Church in Burnsville — which now has two Wednesday night services — and Mount Olivet Lutheran Church in Plymouth. "It's a different demographic," said Pete Erickson, Mount Olivet's faith formation director. "Our trend on Sunday morning is younger families — preschool to about fourth grade. On Wednesdays it's families with older children." Mount Olivet's Wednesday worship, kicked off in 2007, exploded to become the church's largest service with up to 300 people, he said. In recent years, attendance has leveled off to about 150 to 170 people. Erickson attributes the drop to even more traveling sports teams and school events. Wednesday worship is not just an urban trend. The Detroit Lakes United Methodist Church started a Wednesday service that was specifically "child -friendly," but also appealed to hospital workers, shift workers and the many weekend travelers. It's been a tremendous success. "Me first night we had 90 people," said the Rev. Brenda North. "We figured we were on to something." Parents with shared custody of their children turned out to be among the regulars, said North, as "it's hard to build a church habit if you have your child every other weekend." The lure of the lakes, the North Shore and beyond remains an ongoing motivator for midweek services. "°This is Minnesota, land of 10,000 cabins," said the Rev. Karen Bruins, of the Well Methodist churches in Rosemount and Apple Valley. "People start going to their cabins in spring, and stay until fall." Not a panacea But clergy warn that simply opening the doors on Wednesdays won't start a stampede. Church leaders need to figure out if it's a good match for members, and be willing to shift the start time and other options as needed. "You need to get a feel for the pulse of the community, and what fits into their lives," said the Rev. Deb Stehlin, director for evangelical mission at the Minneapolis Area Synod of the Evangelical Lutheran Church in America. Timing is also key. If the service is before 6 p.m., fewer people come, clergy said. If it is launched for the summer, there could be even fewer. The Rev. Stephanie Espinoza, for example, gave Wednesdays a try last summer at Cross of Peace Lutheran Church in Shakopee. The service, she acknowledged, "wasn't super attended." She's trying Monday this summer. Bruins, meanwhile, discovered that a night of sitting didn't mesh with energy levels of younger kids. Now the church plans to restructure Wednesdays, she said, to be "more creative, more interactive, more active, given that they've been in school all day." Some folks question whether the Sabbath — which the Bible says is "the seventh day of the week" — can even be celebrated on a Wednesday. Clergy insist it can be. Said North: "Worshiping cod can happen any day of the week." The trend is no surprise to the Rev. Dawn Alitz, director of lifelong learning programs at Luther Seminary in St. Paul. In fact, the seminary is offering a summer session entitled "Rethinking Sunday Morning," she said. The message: "God may be working more than just on Sunday mornings." 2 of 3 85 4/26/17, 4:03 Pr April 26, 2017 File: 193803811 Attention: Mike Ericson City Administrator City of Centerville 188o Main Street Centerville, MN 55038 Reference: City of Centerville Local Water Plan Dear Mike, Attached is the proposal to update the City of Centerville's Local Water Plan (LWP). All communities in the seven -county metropolitan area are required to have a local water plan as a chapter of the City's local comprehensive plan, as detailed in new Minnesota Rules 841o.o16o (amended July 2015). Cities must adopt a LWP not more than two years before the local comprehensive plan is due. The previous LWP (formerly the City of Centerville Surface Water Management Plan) was updated in 2012. Therefore, under the new Minnesota Rules 841o.o16o, an update to the LWP is required as part of the local comprehensive plan by December 31, 2018. In order to facilitate review from the Rice Creek Watershed District and the Metropolitan Council, we will need to submit the updated Centerville LWP to these agencies by July 31, 2o18. After approval of the LWP by the Rice Creek Watershed District and the Metropolitan Council, the City must adopt and implement its plan within 12o days and amend its official controls within 180 days. To become familiar with new regulations implemented by the Rice Creek Watershed District, as well as the LWP update timeline, we attended the Rice Creek Local Water Plan workshop, along with City of Centerville Public Works Director Paul Palzer, and Lead Project Inspector Greg Burmeister. Thank you for the opportunity to serve the City of Centerville by completing an update to the LWP. Sincerely, STANTEC Mark Statz, PE City Engineer Design with community in mind 86 April 26, 2017 File: 193803811 Attention: Mike Ericson City Administrator City of Centerville 188o Main Street Centerville, MN 55038 Reference: City of Centerville Local Water Plan Dear Mike, Thank you for the opportunity to serve the City of Centerville by completing an update to the City's Local Water Plan (LWP). This letter presents Stantec's proposal for engineering services based on the task list as detailed below. The plan will focus on meeting the latest regulatory minimum requirements as required by the state (MN Rules 8410), Metropolitan Council, and the Rice Creek Watershed District. We look forward to working with the City to update the previous LWP from 2012. LOCAL WATER PLAN TASKS 1. PROJECT INITIATION/MANAGEMENT a. Hold a kickoff meeting with City staff to discuss the City's needs, refine study goals and expectations, and confirm the work plan for the project. b. Develop a schedule of progress meetings. We have budgeted for only the kickoff meetings. If progress meetings are desired, they can be done at an additional cost to the project. 2. DATA COLLECTION a. At the kickoff meeting, discuss data needed for the study. This information could include (electronic files preferred): i. System mapping, topography, and aerial photography ii. Physical system data (storm sewer base mapping, including pipe sizes and invert elevations; pond grading plans; emergency overflow locations and elevations; water quality data) iii. Impaired waters listings and TMDL information iv. MS4 program information v. Land use vi. Capital improvement plan vii. Street reconstruction program viii. Water resource related agreements Design with commuNty its mind 87 April 26, 2017 Mike Ericson Page 2 of 7 Reference: City of Centerville local Water Plan ix. Past studies and reports x. Known problem areas b. Follow up with City staff to obtain the available information. 3. PREPARE LOCAL WATER PLAN UPDATE a. Update LWP report to be consistent with latest state (MN Rules 8410), Metropolitan Council, and watershed requirements. We understand that the City is looking to make minor updates to their LWP to meet the requirements of the regulatory agencies mentioned above. Currently the City's LWP has the following sections: i. Executive Summary; ii. Introduction; iii. Physical Environment; iv. Hydrologic Calculations/Modeling Parameters; v. Water Resource Management Objectives and Policies; vi. Water Resource Management Plan; vii. Implementation Program; viii. Capital Improvements Plan; ix. Storm Water Charges; x. Amendment Process; and xi. Appendices b. To meet the minimum requirements, the sections below will need to be modified. A Current Assessment section will also need to be created to meet the new minimum requirements: i. Executive Summary: The executive summary will summarize and give highlights from the overall LWP. It allows the casual user to have a quick understanding of the background, purpose, and scope of the LWP. Stantec will review the current executive summary and update it to include the new highlights of the plan. ii. Introduction: The introduction of the LWP was originally intended to give a clear definition of why it is required and important for the City to have a LWP and to give the requirements of the governing authorities to keep the City's LWP in compliance. We will review and update this section so the viewer can easily identify the minimum requirements set forth by the governing agencies. This section will be updated to reflect the new LWP review timeline, which is now part of the ten-year Comprehensive Plan cycle. Instead of serving as a stand-alone document as it previously did, the LWP will now be incorporated as an appendix to the Comprehensive Plan. Design with cornrnunliy in mind 88 April 26, 2017 Mike Ericson Page 3 of 7 Reference: City of Centerville Local Water Plan iii. Physical Environment: The current plan covers general information regarding the general location, geology and topography, soils, climate, lakes and other significant waterbodies, wetlands, land use, utility systems, unique areas, zoning and floodplain management, and groundwater characteristics of the City. The LWP will detail drinking water supply management areas (DWSMA) and the city's plan for addressing/protecting groundwater. The Plan will discuss groundwater discharge and recharge areas including the identification of potential land uses affecting groundwater. The City will update land use and zoning maps for present and future conditions, as well as a land cover classification map, such as Minnesota Land Cover Classification System (MLCCS) maps. Key Conservation Areas will be identified. We will specifically review the impaired waters list under the water resources section and compare it to the most recent 303d impaired waters list from the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency. A map of these waters will be provided. Water bodies with TMDLs will be listed in this section. For Centerville, these include Peltier Lake & Centerville Lake TMDL, Lino Lakes Chain of Lakes TMDL, Upper Mississippi River TMDL. The Upper Mississippi River TMDL for bacteria has been set recently, so we will discuss actions for addressing the TMDL in this section. We will perform a review to this information and work with the City to verify any changes or additions that are needed to remain in compliance with the section. iv. Hydrologic Calculations/Modeling Parameters: This section covers the water quantity and NURP standards when designing storm water ponds and other stormwater features. We will update the design storm parameters to reflect the new NOAA Atlas 14 Rainfall data that has become the new industry standard. The LWP will address physical changes to the stormwater system, and if there are changes, these will be reflected in an updated map of the system. It is our understanding there is not a City-wide stormwater model for the City of Centerville and this proposal does not include time for the development of any hydrologic or hydraulic modeling. Stantec is aware the Rice Creek Watershed District has created a district -wide hydrologic and hydraulic model. Stantec well request to obtain a portion of the model that includes the City of Centerville to try to gather information on drainage areas and paths of stormwater runoff, as well as to provide information about future conditions and intercommunity flows. The model outputs might also help identify and acknowledge future changes to structures that have potential for overtopping, as well as impacts of future land use changes on peak water elevations at storage areas that are currently at risk to flooding due to the more intense storms that are occuring. Additionally, RCWD requires an updated floodplain map, which will also be acquired by the RCWD and based on their District - Wide Model. v. Water Resources Management Objectives and Policies: The current water resources management objectives and policies cover items related to: water quantity; water quality; recreation; fish and wildlife; enhancements of public participation through information and education; public ditch systems; Dr.sigrt with community in mind 89 April 26, 2017 Mike Ericson Page 4 of 7 Reference: City of Centerville Local Water Plan groundwater; wetlands; and erosion. Stantec will review each objective and policy and recommend revisions to the City based on requirements of the watersheds and other agencies with jurisdiction in the City of Centerville that are currently stricter than the City's requirements. Specific RCWD regulations require that the City address 1) its volume debit and how to the City plans to address this debit, 2) strategies in place to manage water volumes in land- locked areas to minimize flooding, and 3) opportunities for stormwater reuse. vi. Water Resources Management Plan: The water resources management plan section highlights the requirements the City currently enforces to meet the water resources management objectives and policies section. We will review this section and make revisions based on the new requirements. We will also review the City's official controls to ensure we are staying consistent with your codes and ordinances. If we feel your ordinances and codes could be updated during our review, we would make those recommendations to the City. We will specifically review the water quality section to ensure the protection methods in place are adequate to meet the official controls. This section will also include an assessment of the existing and potential water resources related problem within the City, and potential funding opportunities for the City. Reuse opportunities will be identified, in accordance with RCWD's rules. vii. Implementation Program and Capital Improvement Projects (CIP): Stantec will work with the City to update your implementation plan. We will evaluate the items in the current Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) in section 8 of the LWP and determine what items have been accomplished, what items are no longer applicable to the CIP, and what items have yet to be completed. To be in compliance with the new regulations, we will create a CIP table to include the schedule of each project, the estimated cost of each project, and the funding source of each project, in addition to a year by year analysis. This table will prioritize the nonstructural, programmatic, and structural solutions we have identified. An additional table will be created that describes each component of the implementation program that will detail the schedule, estimated cost, and funding sources for each component including annual budget totals. As part of the implementation plan, Stantec will clearly define the roles and responsibilities of the community for carrying out the implementation components of the LWP. viii. Stormwater Charges: This section discusses the stormwater utility fees that are charged to City residential, commercial, industrial properties as well as new development. We do not anticipate a change to the stormwater utility fee section. If the City would like to revisit this section and update, Stantec can work with the City to update their stormwater utility fee for an additional fee. ix. Amendment Procedures: The current amendment procedures section of the LWP discusses the amendments and future updates process. Stantec will review this section as well as the watershed organization plans to verify the review and adoption process still meets the requirements of the local watershed Design with community In mind 90 April 26, 2017 Mike Ericson Page 5 of 7 Reference: City of Centerville local Water Plan organizations. If necessary, we will update the LWP to clearly define the process by which amendments are made to the LWP that follow the watershed organizations' procedures. x. Technical Appendices: The following maps are included in the appendix of the City's LWP: Location Map; USGS Topographic Map; NRCS Soils Map; National Wetland Inventory mapping; MLCCS Land Cover Map; Existing Land Use Plan; 203o Future Land Use Plan; Zoning Map; Floodplain Map; Storm Sewer & Drainage Basin Map; and the Capital Improvement Plan Map. We envision changes to these maps being minor updates. We will work with the City to verify any changes that must be made to these maps and coordinate with the City's comprehensive land use plan team to obtain their updated land use plan and 2040 future land use plan for the report. We will include the City's SWPPP as technical appendix, as well as MnDNR approved Floodplain & Shoreland ordinances, if applicable. Currently the following codes are included in the City's LWP: City Code Chapter 157: Erosion Control; City Code Chapter 155: Flood Damage Prevention; and City Code Section 156.133: Special Provisions Related to Development or Building on Lands within loo Feet of Centerville Lake, Peltier Lake, or Clearwater Creek. We will work with the City to identify any other codes that are applicable to this LWP and attach it as part of the LWP. 4. LOCAL WATER PLAN REPORT DELIVERABLE a. Prepare a user-friendly report that can be read by a non-technical audience yet still provides sufficiently detailed technical data for use by the City in storm sewer planning. b. Include graphics, figures and maps to clarify items discussed in the report. c. Provide draft and final reports as follows: i. First draft for City staff review ii. Second draft for submittal to watersheds and Metropolitan Council 1. Respond to review comments and update report accordingly iii. Final report for City approval and use d. Prepare a separate reproducible summary suitable for public distribution. e. Present the results of the report at a City Council or other public meeting, at the City's direction. COMPENSATION AND SCHEDULE Stantec proposes to provide the City of Centerville with professional engineering services required to provide the services described herein regarding the Local Water Plan. Upon receiving authorization to proceed with the project, Stantec will set up a kickoff meeting and Design with community in mind 91 (A� April 26, 2017 Mike Ericson Page 6 of 7 Reference: City of Centerville Local Water Plan commence data collection and model updating. Stantec anticipates providing the completed, draft surface water plan for City review within six months of the authorization to proceed. We would be happy to adjust our schedule to meet the needs of the City. The team providing services will include Dan Edgerton as project manager and Tyler Johnson as lead engineer, with others supporting as needed. Stantec will provide services on an hourly basis and estimates the level of effort required to be $24,000 in accordance with the above work plan. Reimbursable expenses are included in this proposed figure. Stantec will not exceed the hourly amount without further authorization from you. This letter represents the understanding between the City and Stantec in respect to the Project and may only be modified in writing signed by both of us and is subject to the current Master Services Agreement between the City of Centerville and Stantec. Design with community In mind 92 April 26, 2017 Mike Ericson Page 7 of 7 Reference: City of Centerville Local Wafer Plan If this letter satisfactorily sets forth the conditions of our Agreement, please sign in the space below and return one copy to our office. We very much appreciate the opportunity to provide these services. Please contact us if you have any specific questions; either Mark Statz at 651.604.4709 or Tyler Johnson at 651.604.4767. � ;-� _ Mark Statz, PE Associate City of Centerville By _ Re Print Name and Title Tyler Johnson, PE Project Manager Design with cornmu ity In mind 93 Date RCWD Riff CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT LOCAL WATER PLAN REVIEW CHECKLIST (Created from Chapter 8, Section 8.3.1 of 2010 RCWD Watershed Management Plan (WMP) & references requirements listed in Minnesota Statute 1038.235 Subd. 2 & Minnesota Rule 8410.0160. Please note that this checklist is meant to be a tool & should not replace the requirements as listed in rule/statute or the District's WMP) GENERAL STANDARDS AND STATUTE/RULE REQUIREMENTS Provide an executive summary that includes the highlights of the local water plan. Describe any water resource management related agreements that have been entered by your community. This includes joint powers agreements related to water management that the community may be a party to between itself and watershed management organization(s), adjoining communities, or private parties. _ Include a section on amendment procedures that defines the process by which amendments may be made. The amendment procedure must be consistent with the amendment procedures in the watershed organization (s) plans that affect your community. _ Describe the existing and proposed physical environment and land use. Include land use and zoning maps for present and future conditions. Include land cover classification map, such as MLCCS (Minnesota Land Cover Classification System). Define drainage areas and the volumes, rates, and paths of stormwater runoff. Include a map of the stormwater system that shows stormwater ponds, streams, lakes and wetlands, structural pollution devices (grit chambers, separators), pipes and pipe sizes, ditches, any other conveyances, outfalls/discharge points (note that these items can be included as separate figures). Include inspection and maintenance system schedule of stormwater features (can include MS4 portion by reference). _ Discuss or identify approaches, methods, means, procedures, ordinances, or plans being used to achieve compliance w/RCWD rules or reliance on RCWD for municipal review and compliance with stormwater management requirements. Provide a specific statement that the community requests the RCWD to continue to implement its rules and regulations and issue permits within the community. _ Describe methods that will be used to control and manage post -construction stormwater associated with development and re -development (can include MS4 SWPPP permit by reference). _ Provide proof that the community discharge is equal to or less than the community rates established in the RCWD Modeling. Acknowledge and identify locations where flows leave the community and are transferred downstream, with some assessment of the estimated rate assuming full build -out conditions, and describe measures being implemented to reduce flows if necessary. Identify whether these flows are 94 SCRCWD RICE (REEK WATERSMED DISTRICT problematic to manage, generally describe one or more methods for managing these flows, and identify whether assistance from RCWD is needed. Identify regulated areas such as Resource Management Plan (RMP) areas, Wetland Protection Zones, Ecological Management Corridor, High Quality Wetlands, MN County Biological Survey. _ Set forth an implementation program, including a description of official controls and, as appropriate, a capital improvement program. Clearly define responsibilities of the local government unit (LGU) from that of RCWD for carrying out implementation components. ` Include a table that briefly describes each component of the implementation program and clearly details the schedule, estimated cost, and funding sources for each component including annual budget totals. Include an assessment of the existing water resource related problems in your community. _ Include an assessment of the potential water resource related problems in your community. Include a prioritized nonstructural, programmatic, and structural solutions to identified problems. _Include a list or map of impaired waters within your community as shown on the most current 303d impaired waters list. OTHER WATERSHED REQUIREMENTS (Please note these requirements are for RCWD. There may be other watershed organizations within your community with different requirements) _ Identify land -locked sub -watershed units and basins and strategies to manage water volumes in land -locked areas to minimize flooding. _ Identify impaired water bodies and establish policies and actions to address TMDL goals. Identify Key Conservation Areas in your community and assess the adequacy of local policies and regulatory control in place to conserve hydrology and ecologic value of the resources in the area. The plan must set forth a strategy and schedule for the amendment of those policies and controls as necessary to meet performance standards established in plans. _ Discuss geologic features, groundwater sensitivity, groundwater dependent natural resource, and groundwater discharge and recharge areas including the identification of potential land uses affecting groundwater. Identify ideas and opportunities for projects and programs intended to improve resource management, which many be jointly implemented with the RCWD. Describe the conformance of the municipality with NPDES requirements for MS4 permits, including TMDL and Non -degradation (if applicable) requirements. Must include the SWPPP or a summary of its content and incorporate the plan by reference. Identify erosion and sediment ordinances for sites less than 1 acre in size. 95 IgRCWD RICE CREER WATERSHED DISTRICT Describe housekeeping requirements such as street sweeping, snow plowing, salt and snow storage, and public land maintenance. (Can use MS4 by reference). Describe the Best Management Practices employed by the City/Town that reduce or control pollutants. (Can use MS4 by reference). _ Demonstrate a public information and education plan related to managing sediment and erosion control, runoff and water quality. (Can use MS4 by reference). _ Include a groundwater protection component consistent with the county groundwater management plan. (At this time, relevant to Washington County only. Ramsey County does not have an approved groundwater management plan). Discuss conflict between infiltration requirements and wellhead protection. Adopt & include copies of MnDNR approved Floodplain & Shoreland when mandated by state law. Include a discussion on stormwater reuse opportunities. Utilize RCWD resources to identify and describe problem areas, such as floodplain increases or stormwater capacity limitations. _Identify and acknowledge future changes in peak elevation at critical road crossings for critical structure maximum water elevations, modeling shows potential for overtopping. (see HEI, 2016 Appendix A, Figure 15). Describe management needs and strategies, and identify necessary RCWD management assistance. _Identify and acknowledge the impacts of future land use changes on peak water elevation at storage areas near current flooding problem areas (see HEI, 2016 Figures 12-14, Table 13). Describe management needs and strategies, and identify necessary RCWD management assistance. _Identify and acknowledge changes in floodplain elevation and regulatory floodplain boundaries (see HEI, 2016 Figure 20). Describe management needs and strategies, and identify necessary RCWD management assistance. _Identify the amount, if any, of remaining volume control debit previously incurred through the regulatory program, and describe previous and future activities to ensure reasonable progress toward eliminating the volume control debit within the next plan cycle. LEVEL 2 CITIES (in addition to the requirements above, cities wishing to adopt official controls to pursue permitting authority must include the additional information and detail below, see WMP 8.3.1) _ The local plan must include information on existing and proposed stormwater rates and volumes based on full build -out taking into account implementation of the local regulatory control. The information should be related to those volume and rate control locations within the District and include analyses on Regional Assessment Locations. 96 W4,RCWD RICE CREEK WATEMED DIARU — Identify the methods and means to achieve Rule C, Part 5, Water Quality and Volume Control of the RCWD rules. ` Identify areas and elevations for stormwater storage adequate to meet Rule C, Part 6, Peak Stormwater Runoff Control and RCWD Rules. `Include specific local ordinances and demonstrate that they're in compliance with RCWD rules or include at a minimum that the City adopts RCWD rules and regulation by reference. (see Ch. 8.3.2) _ Acknowledge and identify those locations where flows leave the City and are transferred downstream, with an assessment of how the rules applied by the City under current full build-out conditions to reduce flows if necessary. Identify whether these flows are problematic to manage, generally describe one or more methods for managing these flows, and identify whether assistance from the RCWD is needed. SUBMITTALS _ Met Council (45 -day review period) _ Watershed Districts (60 -day review period, incorporates comments of Met Council) _ Washington County (45 -day review period) Please contact Lauren Sampedro at 763-398-3078 or at Isampedro(?ricecreek.org for any questions, or to set up a pre -submittal meeting to discuss the plan requirements and any known problem areas within your community. To aid in a timely review, the District asks that you complete this checklist prior to submitting your local plan. 4 97 Teresa Bender From: Statz, Mark <Mark.Statz@stantec.com> Sent: Tuesday, May 02, 201711:28 AM To: Mike Ericson Cc: Paul Palzer; Greg Burmeister; Simmons, Jonathan; Mcculloch, Ailsa; Teresa Bender Subject: Local Water Plan Proposal Attachments: Centerville Surface Water Management Plan Proposal April 2017 Final.pdf Mike, Attached is our proposal to assist Greg and Paul in completing your update to the Local Water Plan. The first page of the attached is a cover letter which explains the need for the plan. The final pages of the attachment are the checklist of items that the RCWD will be looking for as it reviews this document. The deadline for submitting this plan for review is June of 2018. if you find the proposal acceptable, please have it placed on the next available agenda for consideration by the City Council. Thanks. Mark R. Slaiz, PE Associate Stantec 2335 Highway 36 West„ St Phone: (651) 604-4709 Cell: (651) 775-5126 Mark.Statz@stantec.com Paul MN 55113-3819 The content of this email is the confidential property of Stantec and should not be copied, modified, retransmitted, or used for any purpose except with Stantec's written authorization. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete all copies and notify us immediately. ® Please consider the environment before printing this email. This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service. For more information please visit http://www.s=anteccloud.com 98 4 Stantec To: Centerville City Council From: Mark Statz 1880 Main St 2335 Highway 36 West Centerville, MN 55038 St. Paul, Minnesota 55113 File: City of Centerville - General Date: May 2, 2017 Engineering Reference: LaMotte Park Stormwater Reuse System - Air Sampling Test Results Memo Last fall, the Department of Health, in collaboration with the University of Minnesota, the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), and the United States Geological Survey (USGS), collected air and "mist' samples from LaMotte Park while our stormwater reuse system was in operation. The samples were taken as part of a larger study on the safety of stormwater reuse systems. The results of those tests are attached in a memo from the Department of Health. The information in the memo can be, on the surface, a bit alarming and difficult to understand. However, it is worth noting that, in the Recommendations section of the memo, the Department of Health does not recommend the city cease operations or even modify them. I will be on hand at the next City Council meeting to discuss the results in further detail. For those of you not part of the City Council when this project was initiated, I have also attached the memo regarding our due diligence on health and safety issues for this project that we presented at the time. Attachment: Department of Health Memo 2010 Letter on Due Dillegence for Reuse system. C. Mike Ericson, Paul Palzer, Jonathan Simmons Design wM con nuffly In rnInd sm r:\client\municipal\centerviiie_ci_mn\616gen\lamotte stormwater reuse air sampling results summary.clocx 99 Microbial Air Sampling Results —Centerville Irrigation System Summary The Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) has received preliminary results for microbial air sampling of the Centerville stormwater irrigation system. While some microbes were detected, the results are not unusual for water that is accessed by water fowl and other wildlife. Based on the data collected during this one -day sampling event (described below), we currently recommend continuing to operate the sprinklers during the overnight hours when the park is not in use. Introduction Microbial air sampling during operation of stormwater irrigation sprinklers was completed on October 4, 2016 in Laurie LaMotte Park in Centerville, MN. Dr. Mark Borchardt and staff from the U.S. Department of Agriculture and U. S. Geological Survey in Marshfield, WI, and Dr. Tim La Para from the University of Minnesota in Minneapolis conducted the sampling and analyses. A complete description of the sample methods will be published at a later time. A general summary is as follows: Samples were collected from one sprinkler head on the southeast side of the park. Three trials were run during daylight hours, with each trial lasting roughly one hour. Five button samplers (to collect material for genetic analysis) and five Andersen samplers (to collect material for lab cultures) were set at distances of 275, 325, 425, 525, and 625 feet from the sprinkler. A control sampler (to sample air without the irrigation spray) was set up to the side of the running sprinkler, out of the trajectory of the irrigation spray. Water samples directly from the pond which supplies the sprinkler were also collected, in addition to a sample directly from the sprinkler head. The researchers tested for the following microbes: Organism name Type of Example of common symptoms in humans caused Microbe by an infection with the microbe Adenovirus Virus Dermal, Respiratory, Gastrointestinal A; B; C, D, F Avian influenza Virus Usually respiratory symptoms in birds; occasionally infects humans, resulting in influenza Enterovirus Virus Dermal, Respiratory, Gastrointestinal, Paralysis Human Virus Cancer (long term) Polyomavirus Minnesota Department of Health 100 Organism name Type of Microbe Example of common symptoms in humans caused by an infection with the microbe Norovirus GI; Gil Virus Gastrointestinal Pepper mild mottle virus Virus Plant pathogen used for tracking. Rotavirus NSP3; VP7 Virus Gastrointestinal Bacteriodales-like Hum M2 Bacteria A marker for the presence of human sewage Campylobacter jejuni Bacteria Gastrointestinal Enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli Bacteria Gastrointestinal, Kidney Legionella Bacteria Respiratory Salmonella Bacteria Gastrointestinal Cryptosporidium Protozoa Gastrointestinal Giardia lamblia Protozoa Gastrointestinal Results Analyses were done with a technique called quantitative polymerase chain reaction (gPCR) and by growing bacteria on culture plates in the lab. The gPCR tests detect pieces of microbial genetic material that indicate the presence of the microbe, or at least parts of it. Genetic material detected by gPCR included adenovirus A, avian influenza, Bacteriodales, Escherichia coli, legionella. Water samples from the pond and from the sprinkler head showed detections of adenovirus A, Bacteriodales, Cryptosporidium, Legionella, and rotavirus. Concentration ranges are displayed in Table 1 and Table 2. Although genetic material was detected, we do not know if the actual microbes are present or are capable of causing an infection or illness in people. 101 Microbes present in the cultures grown in the lab could include Campylobacter and Salmonella species, but the identification was not confirmed. Again, we are not certain whether these microbes could cause infection or illness in humans. Table 1: Microbe detections by gPCR and concentration range for positive air samples (number of samples = 34) Microbe Positive samples Concentration Range shown, if applicable (genomic copies per liter) Adenovirus A 2 0.1770 -2.4497 Avian Influenza 3 3.5863 —18.3774 Escherichia coli 1 .0003 Bacteroidales- like Hum M2 5 0.1289 —0.6485 Legionella 1 0.2597 Table 2: Microbe detections by gPCR and concentration range for positive water samples (number of samples = 2) Microbe Positive samples Concentration Range shown if applicable (genomic copies per liter) Adenovirus A 1 153.57 Bacteroidales- like Hum M2 1 4783.85 Cryptosporidium 2 18979.43 - 5749218.75 Legionella 2 5.2-756.25 Rotavirus 1 14289.61 3 f [IYA Discussion The concentration of the microbes/genetic material found during this one -day sampling effort is not unusual, especially given the pond can be accessed by water fowl and other wildlife. The high concentrations of Cryptosporidium related to the water sprinkler might be related to the small volume that could be collected directly from the sprinkler, or possibly some bird droppings directly in the samples taken. (More sampling would be needed to verify.) There were no detections of Legionella serogroup 1, which is the serogroup of most concern for human health. The subtype of the avian influenza virus was not determined. However, the presence of avian influenza virus is typical when water fowl are present on ponds. The detection of rotavirus and human Bacteriodales indicates that traces of human sewage are in the pond water. Again, this is not entirely unexpected, since stormwater runoff often passes over areas or objects where human fecal material might exist, such as trash containing soiled diapers, outdoor portable toilets, recreational vehicle dump stations, or other contaminated locations. In some cases, leaking underground sewage pipes have also contributed to the presence of human sewage in stormwater ponds or surface water. The source is not known in this case. Recommendations Given the results from this sampling, MDH would currently advise the City of Centerville to continue the practice of irrigating with the stormwater in the overnight hours when few people are using the park. The exposure of irrigated areas to sunlight in the morning hours, in addition to a longer time period before the public uses the park, will allow potentially harmful organisms to subside or become inactivated. If there are occasions when the source water pond is highly populated with water fowl, or if a public health alert related to bird flu has been issued, refraining from irrigation with the system until the water fowl population has moved away or decreased, or the public health alert has been lifted, may be appropriate. MDH is planning to continue to study questions related to water reuse and public health risks. If additional research causes a change in MDH's recommendations stated above, we will contact the City with our recommendations for operation of the irrigation system. We wish to thank the City of Centerville for the assistance as we work to learn more about water reuse systems in Minnesota. If you have questions or would like to discuss the results of the sampling further, please contact us at 651-201-4923 or nancy.rice@state.mn.us. Minnesota Department of Health Environmental Surveillance and Assessment PO Box 64975 St. Paul, MN 55164-0975 (651) 201-4899 health.risk(@state.mn.us www.health.state.mn.us 2/9/2017 To obtain this information in a different format, call: 651-201-4923. Printed on recycled paper. 4 103 June 8, 2010 Dallas Larson Administrator City of Centerville 1880 Main Street Centerville, MN 55038-9794 Re: Downtown Storm Water Reclamation Project City of Centerville Bonestroo File No.: 000616-08167-0 Dear Dallas: 2335 Highway 36 W St. Paul, MN 55113 Tel 651-636-4600 Fax 651-636-1311 www.bonestroo.com sonestroo At a special City Council meeting/workshop held on October 21, 2009 we presented a letter to the Council regarding some concerns with the stormwater reclamation project. In summary, the concerns are these: 1. Will the reclaimed stormwater harm the grass or other vegetation in the area to be irrigated due to high salt levels or pH? 2. Will the reclaimed stormwater be hazardous for the users of the irrigated area? In an effort to perform our due diligence on these issues, we have and continue to research other similar projects and their experiences. In addition to this measure of assurance, the City Council asked if stormwater from the pond, sediment from the pond, and soil from the balifieids, could be tested to gain a better understanding of what background levels of certain pollutants exist and whether or not these should levels should be of concern. In summary, the results show levels of contaminants in the pond water lower than maximums set for swimming areas and levels of contaminants in the soils within naturally occurring ranges. The following are tables showing the assumed applicable standards, along with our results for the three categories of materials tested. 104 City of Centerville Donmtowz) Storm Water Redamation Project Gage 1 6/8/10 Pond Water Two samples of the water were taken from the Anoka County Park pond (the one to be used for irrigation). They were gathered from different depths: The first at one (1) foot below the surface of the pond and the second at two (2) feet off the bottom of the pond. These are the extents of the proposed intake locations for the irrigation system. The two concerns with the pond water were: Human health and turf growing implications. Although there are no established standards for irrigation water as it relates to human health, we felt that a comparison to established health standards for swimming beaches and lakes classified by the DNR as Class 2A (Fishing and Swimming) would be an appropriate parallel. For pH and Chloride levels, we have shown standards from the PACE Turfgrass Research Institute to evaluate the water's compatibility with turf grass. In brief the standards and our results are: Pollutant Standard Result (Sample 1) Result (Sample 2) Human Health Fecal Coliform Max 200 CFU/100ml- 74 CFU/100 mL 22 CFU/100 mL Legionella ND CFU/mL ND CFU/mL Arsenic 2.0 ug/L Max Avg. ND ug/L Copper 6.4 - 23 ug/L* Max Avg. ND ug/L Mercury 6.9 ng/L Max Avg. ND ug/L pH 6.5 — 8.5 Standard Units 8.0 Standard Units Chloride 230 mg/L Max Avg. 51.9 mg/L CPAH's Fluoranthene 1.9 ug/L Max Avg. ND ug/L Pyrene N/A ug/L ND ug/L Turf Grass Growth pH 6.5 — 7.5** Standard Units 8.0 Standard Untis Chloride <400 mg/L 51.9 mg/L *Depends on total hardness **Can depend on grass species. ND ug/L ND ug/L ND ug/L 8.1 Standard Units 52.1 mg/L ND ug/L ND ug/L 8.1 Standard Units 52.1 mg/L Conclusions — Pond Water Results from the two samples of pond water fall with the established limits for lakes to be used for swimming in the pollutant categories listed above including fecal coliform, heavy metals, pH, Chlorides and PAH's. The samples also showed pH and Chloride levels that are safe for human contact. 105 Gty of Centerville Page 3 Downtown Storm Water Redamabon Project 6/8/10 The pH of the water is a bit out of the desirable range for turf grass growth. There are, however prescribed nutrient levels for fertilizers which can help mitigate this higher -than -desired pH. Increasing the amount of iron and manganese can allow the higher pH level to be viable. It should also be noted, that the current pH of the soil is in this same range and has been supporting turf grass growth thus far. Pond Sediment One sample of the sediment was taken from the Anoka County Park pond (the one to be used for irrigation). The sample was taken at a location near the middle of the pond. The pond sediment was tested for two different reasons. Firstly, we wanted to know the constituents of the sediment since the City has agreed to take over maintenance of the pond in exchange for its use, and the make-up of the sediment can drastically affect the cost of dredging. If the sediment is polluted enough, the material must be landfilled, at great expense. Even though the irrigation system will be designed to ensure sediment is not lifted off the bottom, there could be a public perception that if the sediment is contaminated to the point of needing to be landfilled, the water must be too. The standards shown below are those which elevate the sediment to the point of needing to be landfilled. In brief the standards and our results are: Pollutant Result (Sample 1) Human Health Arsenic 5-20 mg/kg Average 6.0 mg/kg Copper 50 mg/kg Average 7.3 mg/kg Mercury 0.020 - 0.625 mg/kg Avg. ND ng/kg Pond Dredging Level 1 Threshold Level 2 Threshold Arsenic 9 mg/kg 20 mg/kg 6.0 mg/kg Copper 100 mg/kg 9000 mg/kg 7.3 mg/kg Mercury ND mg/kg pH N/A Chloride N/A CPAH's Fiuoranthene 1080 mg/kg Perylene N/A N/A 8.4 Standard Units N/A ND mg/kg 6800 mg/kg ND ug/kg N/A 42.6 ug/kg Conclusions — Pond Sediment For human health concerns, the levels of heavy metals in the pond sediment are within established ranges of those which occur naturally in soil or are tolerable without risk to human health. Comparing the results from our tests to the thresholds needed for pond sediments to require special handling, you'll see that they are under the established limits. 106 atyofCenterwIle Page 4 Downtown Storm Water Redamatbn Project 6/8/10 Balifield Soil Two samples of soil were taken from the outfield areas of the LaMotte Paris balifields (the ones to be irrigated). Soil samples from the balifield areas were taken primarily to establish background levels of certain pollutants. This will help us as we monitor the operation of the system moving forward. For instance, if the grass begins to have trouble, we can again take soil samples and determine if the levels of a certain compound are elevated over what they were before we began irrigating. Then we can address that particular problem rather than having to guess which pollutant is the issue. Additionally, if there was a human health concern, we'd be able to know whether or not it is directly related to the irrigation system. The idea being that if the levels of contaminants in the soil at the time the issue arises are no different than they were before the irrigation project was installed, it would be difficult to point the finger at the system. Below are some excerpts from various authorities outlining the background levels of certain contaminants in typical soils or the levels which can be tolerated without risk to human health. From the MN Department of Health Website: Levels of arsenic in soil from 5 ppm up to 20 ppm (5-20 mg/kg) are generally viewed as safe, even if contact with arsenic at these levels continues for many years. If the level of arsenic in soil is within this range, the potential for any health effect is very small. In fact, contact with arsenic in soil even somewhat above these levels will likely have no health effects. However, if levels do exceed this range, another risk assessment may be done that looks specifically at the site being evaluated to determine what level will be safe for that particular situation. From the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service; Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR). Copper is a reddish metal that occurs naturally in rock, soil, water, sediment and air. Its average concentration in the earth's crust is about 50 parts copper per million parts soil (ppm or mg/kg). Copper also occurs naturally in plants and animals. It is an essential element for all known living organisms including humans and other animals. From the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service; Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR). Normal soil levels [of Mercury] range from 20 to 625 parts of mercury per billion parts of soil (20-625 ppb; or 20,000-625,000 ng per kilogram of soil). A part per billion is one thousand times bigger than a part per trillion. From the PACE Turfgrass Research Institute, below are desired ranges for Chloride and pH. Chloride <400 mg/kg pH 6.5 - 7.5 standard units 107 City of Centerville Downtown Storm Water Reclamation Project In summary, here are the standards or typical ranges of naturally occurring levels. Pollutant Standard Result (Sample 1) Result (Sample 2) Human Health Arsenic 5-20 mg/kg Average 4.9 mg/kg 5.7 mg/kg Copper 50 mg/kg Average 5.7 mg/kg 6.8 mg/kg Mercury 0.020 - 0.625 mg/kg Avg. ND mg/kg 0.022 mg/kg pH 6.5 — 8.5 Standard Units 8.0 Standard Units 8.4 Standard Units Chloride N/A ND mg/kg ND mg/kg CPAH's Fluoranthene 1080 mg/kg Max 0.016 mg/kg ND mg/kg Pyrene N/A 0.012 mg/kg ND mg/kg Turf Grass Growth pH 6.5 — 7.5** Standard Units 8.0 Standard Units 8.4 Standard Units Chloride <400 mg/kg ND mg/kg ND mg/kg **Can depend on grass species. Conclusions — Ballfield Soils Levels of heavy metals discovered on-site are well within the range of naturally occurring concentrations or those which can be tolerated without risk to human health. The pH of the soil is within acceptable ranges for human contact. Page 5 6/8/10 Chloride levels were below detectable thresholds in the soil. In the pond water, mild concentrations of chlorides were discovered. Therefore, the chloride level in the soil should be monitored to see whether or not their concentration builds up over time. The full results of these tests will be made available to the public at City Hall. Please feel free to contact me with any questions you may have. Sincerely, Mark Statz City Engineer 651-604-4709 cc: Paul Palzer — Public Works Director Randy Neprash, Jeff Peters, Jeff McDowell - Bonestroo 108 CITY OF CENTERVILLE ,erva MONTHL Y ENGINEER'S REPORT For the May 10, 2017 City Council Meeting stabhched X';, - Italics = New information. Normal = No change from last report. 1. 2017 Thin Overlay Program (193803766). A preconstruction meeting was held with Valley Paving on 5/3. A construction schedule will be provided at the City Council meeting. 2. Wellhead Protection Plan Update — Phase I (193803358). We are still waiting for feedback and approval from the MN Department of Health. Once approval is given, the final delineation runs will be conducted and the Part 1 report will be wrapped up for final submittal. 3. Water Supply Plan (193803563). The Water Supply Plan has been updated per the Department of Natural Resources comments. Once the DNR and Met Council review the document again, we will assist with comments if needed. Work is on hold until comments have been received (timeframe unknown). Thanks to all city staff who helped gather data for the plan. 4. Miscellaneous (193803811). • Centerville Elementary School — Greg Burmeister has been in touch with the contractor and is working with them on punch list, restoration, and landscaping items. This is an active NPDES permit which will need to be documented. • Mattamy Homes (Lino Lakes) — Mattamy is selling all their Minnesota holdings, including the east Lino Lakes properly. They are working with a potential buyer, The Lino Lakes City Council just extended the preliminary plat approval through December of this year. We expect to see something in the next two to three months • Stormwater Reuse at LaMotte Park — A spring start-up of the system is scheduled for Thursday 5/4. During this start-up, a pressure test will be conducted to better measure the operating pressure of the system. This will help us accurately quantify the amount of Stormwater being used. This information is key to resolving the issue of of how much banked stormwater credit the city has as a result of the use of this system. Air sampling results, from the Dept, of Health s study at LaMotte Park will be discussed with the City Council • 21st Avenue Distribution Center (Lino Lakes) — Curb and gutter construction on 21st Ave. began on 5/3, with paving set to follow shortly atter. We would expect final restoration within a month or so. • Rehbein Black Dirt Operation We are still awaiting a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan, prepared by a qualified individual to be submitted as required by their Interim Use Permit. A letter reminding Mr. Rehbein of this requirement was recently sent. The MPC4 has determined that the site does not meet the definition of an Industrial Use and will therefore, not need an Industrial Use Permit, through their agency, administered by the local MS 4 permit holder • Ruffridge-Johnson Site Development — The City Council agreed to an extension of the purchase agreement at their last meeting. The sale was delayed because R7 was unable to close on the sale of their Minneepolls properly, However, R7 continues to work with a developer and anticipated their sale to go through within the next 10 months or so. • Sewer, Water, and Stormwater Rates — We presented information on utility rates to the council at previous workshops. This information should be revisited as budget discussions resume for 2018. • Waterworks Site — The building offic/al and City Attorney continue to work with the property owner to facilitate building demolition. • Downtown Overlay/Reconstruction/Water Main — A city intern is working on a grant application for infrastructure in the downtown. • Comprehensive Plan — A proposal for the completion of the Comprehensive Plan has been submitted to City staff.' The Comprehensive Plan must be completed by the end of 2018. • Local Water Plan — This is an update to what was formerly known as the city's Surface Water Management Plan and is separate from the Wellhead Protection Plan and Water Supply Plan, A proposal for the completion of the Local Water Plan has been submitted to City staff. 109 03 -May -17 R f 4 A1000 Strat Milestone 0;17 -May -17 _ 10 Stmt Milestone Subs A1010 . Substantial Com etion 01 :01 -Jun -17 11 V, 01 -Jt A1_020_ Traffic/Erosion Control 1017_ -May -17 17 -May -17 10 ............................................................................_........., i'iallic l rosion ircrifroi ..... A1030 Remo�re Curb _. �.1 - _ 17 -May -17 17 -May -1710 Remo orb Install new Curb A1035 Install new Curb 3=2_0 May -17 •23-May17 ,__ 13 Trail A1040uA -_-.—. Remove Trail - - - - 1 18 -May -17 18-M8 17 a _ _g10 10 nstall Catch Basins A10_50 .Install Catch Basins 1 19-AAay-17 19 -May -17 y rrrrrarrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrarrrrr.-rrr ................ .. .......... ........,.............. Miil"tr�eets end final _ Miil Streets and Trial 2;24 -May -17 _ 25 -May -17 11 riay Stn _A1_060 A7070 overlay Street and Trail Y _ _. ,. 4' 26 May -17_ 31 -May -17 � 11 Strip _ A1080 _ Striping W., _ _ _ ~1 +01 -Jun -17 _ 01•Jun-17 11 f1• Actual Work Critical Remaining Wont '!mmmI Summary Page 1 of i K fifter All or rrraining Work ♦ ♦ Milestone Teresa Bender om: John Slusarczyk <John.Slusarczyk@co.anoka.mn.us> .gent: Friday, April 28, 2017 1:31 PM To: Dave Berkowitz (D.Berkowitz@andovermn.gov); Stephanie Rouse; Ben Nelson; City of Bethel; Cory Richter, Teresa Bender, Chandra Peterson; Elizabeth x. Mursko; publicworks@columbiaheightsmn.gov, jensen@ci.coon-rapids.mn.us; Colleen Winter, David A. Krugler (DKrugler@rfcengineering.com); Bill Petracek; Verbick, Ben; Barb Nelson; Tim Kelly; Patrick Baldwin; Mike Jungbauer; Loren Wickham; Jim.Kosluchar@FridleyMN.gov, Don Krueger, Barb Held; Rebecca Blue; michael.grochala@ci.lino-lakes.mn.us; Gladhill, Tim; pbelfiori@ricecreek.org; chris.lord@anokaswcd.org Cc: DL-TR-DeltaTeam; Jeff S. Reimringer, Jonell M. Sawyer, Pam J. LeBlanc; Bart F. Biernat; Crystal Passi; Danielle Sanborn; Glenn Fuchs; Johnson, Jesse; Karen Blaska; Jeff S. Reimringer; Sevcik, Timothy; Charlie Teff; Julie Teske; Tim Schwab Subject: 2017 Pictometry Flight All, With good clear days being few and far between this spring, Pictometry was unable to get planes up in Anoka County to complete our 2017 flight. Rather than push it and get "leaf on" imagery, we've decided to postpone the flight until this fall. The cost share amounts that were sent out to government agencies last June are still valid. I will keep you posted on the flight schedule, billing and expected delivery date of the imagery. hanks and have a good weekend. John Anoka Co GIS NOTICE: Unless restricted by law, email correspondence to and from Anoka County government offices may be public data subject to the Minnesota Data Practices Act and/or may be disclosed to third parties. This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service. For more information please visit htti)://www.sManteccloud.com 111 5/2/2017 Peltier Lake drawdown rescheduled l News l presspubs.com http://www.presspubs.com/quad/news/article 4cl4b002-29cb-11e7-ba43-3bdf6013l8d2.htmi Peltier Lake drawdown rescheduled By Shannon Granholm/Editor Apr 25, 2017 Updated Apr 27, 2017 w� Twin Cities —40.32 in2016 Wettest Year on Record •datasime last so• 40' Breakdown by month Jan 0.31 Jul 5.09 Feil 1.09 Aug 7.82 Mar 2.26 Sep 5.47 Apr 2.84 Oct 3,41 May 2.42 Nov 2.98 Jun 4.49 Dec 2.14 ,2016 30' zor7rta � Yearly Precipitation Accumulation Graph.-�—' 10` or felt fMel +i%3 MqI W,t 01 *"1 *1 Qat Nrnt nets National Weather Service i Submitted According to the National weather Service, 2016 was the wettest year on record for the Twin Cities area with 40.32 inches of precipitation. Due to the wet fall, the drawdown of Peltier Lake was unsuccessful. The temporary drawdown project of Peltier Lake was unsuccessful, but plans are in the works to try again. Last September the Rice Creek Watershed District (RCWD) began the drawdown to reduce the water level in Peltier Lake by approximately 3 feet. The goal of the project was to manage invasive plants, particularly curlyleaf pondweed, and improve water clarity. "With the rain we had in September, we knew that we were going to have to get some dry weather in order to make up for the wet starting conditior said RCWD lake and stream specialist Matt Kocian. "As the fall went on and we kept getting rain, we saw our chances diminishing to reach that to elevation." According to the National Weather Service, 2016 was the wettest year on record for the Twin Cities area with 40.32 inches of precipitation surpassing the previous record of 40.15 inches in 1911. This year, 5.47 inches fell in September, 3.41 inches in October and 2.98 inches in November. "For a while we did leave the stop logs on the dam out, hoping that we might hit some intermediate mark and see some benefits from that. So even if we didn't hit our target elevation, we might still be able to draw it down a foot or two and see some benefits," Kocian explained. "But the rain just kept coming and the drawdown structure wasn't able to keep up with all of the water that was coming through from the watershed" Around the holidays, RCWD made the decision to put the stop logs back in the dam, not only because the drawdown was unsuccessful, but also for safety concerns. "At that point solid ice was starting to form on the lake and there was a concern that if we were able to draw the lake down after ice already formed on the lake, then it would just make a messy situation on the edge of the lake with the ice sheet continuing to fall and continuing to break up around the shoreline," he said. http:/twww.presspjbs.com/quad/news/article 4c14bW2 29cb-11e7-ba43-3bdf61121iaftnl 1/2 5/2/2017 Peltier Lake drawdown rescheduled I Nears I presspubs.com The projected project cost of the drawdown was $35,000. Thankfully, the drawdown itself doesn't make up a large portion of the project budget. "Removing the stop logs is not very expensive. The cost is in doing all of the public outreach, getting all of the permits, the engineering to make sure there is not going to be any unintended consequences or flooding," Koclan said. "So now that the work is done and the expense has been incurred, we ,`eel comfortable trying the drawdown again. Because the legwork or homework is already done, we have that platform to stand on and that base to work from." The plan is to try lowering the water elevation again in the fall. Kocian is not sure if there will be community meetings regarding the project or If notices will be sent out to landowners on the lake. It is also uncertain if the RCWD will have to go through the permitting process again; RCWD is currently working with the DNR on the details. Shannon Granholm can be reached at 651-407-1227 or at quadnews@presspubs.com. h4rJAAfww.presspubs.com/quadlmws/arbrAe 4c14b=-29cb-11e7-ba43-3bdI(1138a t*nl M RCWQ anRICE CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT June 15, 2016 PELTIER LAKE DRAWDOWN LANDOWNER APPROVAL PACKET 114 RCWD RCE CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT PROJECT DESCRIPTION & INTENT In 2002, Peltier Lake was listed as impaired by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) and placed on the 303(d) list. The impairment is based on excess phosphorus, which creates more frequent and more intense algae blooms. Algae blooms interfere with recreation, and negatively impact ecological health. In 2013, a total maximum daily load (TMDL) was approved by the MPCA and the US Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) for Peltier Lake (EOR, 2013). The TMDL indicates that the majority of phosphorus loading to Peltier Lake is occurring internally. The internal phosphorus loading contributes to plant and algae growth. This cycle reoccurs on an annual basis. The TMDL identifies a plant, curlyleaf pondweed, as a contributor to internal loading of phosphorus. One of the projects identified in the TMDL is a water level drawdown. Performing the drawdown over the winter months can kill curlyleaf pondweed turions by exposing them to freezing and desiccation. Turions are buds that deposit on the lake bottom and are able to grow into a new plant during the next season. Additionally, drawing down the lake consolidates exposed sediments, promoting the germination and rooting of healthy, native plant seeds rather than nuisance plants such as curlyleaf pondweed and Eurasian watermilFoil. i In 2015, the Rice Creek Watershed District (RCWD) retained Houston Engineering, Inc. (HEI) to conduct a feasibility study for the drawdown of Peltier Lake (HEI, 2015). The study included the analysis of three drawdown scenarios. The scenarios ranged from simply removing the stop logs at the dam outlet structure to removing the stop logs combined with various degrees of pumping water from the lake, over the dam. Each scenario produced in a different drawdown level. The feasibility analysis examined drawdown effects on downstream elevation and flows, probable oxygen depletion in Peltier Lake, and cost to achieve the drawdown. The scenario ultimately chosen for the drawdown involves only removing the stop logs in the lake dam outlet structure and allowing the lake level to drop approximately 3 feet. The drawdown is proposed to occur in the fall of 2016, following the aquatic recreation season, and continue through the winter into the spring of 2017. Once the stop logs are removed, the lake will take approximately 51 days to drawdown to its target (design) elevation, anticipated to be approximately 882 feet NAVD88. This drawdown elevation is based on hydraulic modeling of the removal of the stop logs in the dam outlet structure. The drawdown time could be affected by any rain events that occur during the drawdown, which would increase the drawdown time. Once the lake has reached its final drawdown elevation, approximately 200 acres (34%) of the lake bottom area will be exposed along the shoreline. Figure 1 shows estimates of the footprint of the water surface at both the ordinary high water (OHW) elevation (884.88 NAVD88) and at the proposed drawdown elevation (882.06 NAVD88). The OHW is similar to a "typicar level during the spring. Based on plant surveys performed by the RCWD, the drawdown will expose a significant portion of the shoreline lake bottom affected by curlyleaf pondweed. Once the lake and shoreline freeze during the winter season, exposed cudyleaf pondweed plants and turions within the exposed sediment will freeze, desiccate, and be unable to regrow during the next summer season. Fish will be protected from winterkill by an aeration system operated by Anoka County Parks. Once ice -out occurs in the spring, the stop logs will be placed back in the dam outlet structure and the lake inflow from Rice Creek will begin to gradually refill the lake. The lake will very likely refill within a few weeks, dependent upon the amount of snowmelt and the size of spring rainfall events occurring during the refill period. Once the lake has refilled, the dam will continue to function as normal. The effect of the drawdown on curlyleaf pondweed abundance, algal blooms, and overall water quality will be monitored over the 2017 season to assess the success of the drawdown. The current proposal is a one-time occurrence. However, as the results of 1 115 RCWD RICE CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT the drawdown are assessed, the RCWD may explore the use of periodic drawdowns in the future to manage curlyleaf pondweed. The RCWD has involved various local governmental units (LGUs), state government agencies, and stakeholder groups throughout the drawdown feasibility study. Outreach and involvement has included presentations by the RCWD, sharing of feasibility study information, and solicitation of comments and concerns to be taken into consideration as part of the drawdown. As a result, the drawdown project has received constructive input and significant support by various groups including: • Minnesota Pollution Control Agency; • Minnesota Department of Natural Resources; • Anoka County Parks and Recreation; and • City of Lino Lakes Environmental Board. Members of the various groups see the drawdown as both an effort to improve water quality in the lake and a research opportunity to study curlyleaf pondweed management. Peltier Lake is a MnDNR "sentinel lake". The Sentinel Lakes program is a cooperative effort between the MnDNR and the MPCA. The goals of the program are to monitor chemical, physical, and biological changes over time, determine the mechanisms that drive these changes, and identify long-term management solutions that are sustainable based on the ecosystem. The wealth of data collected on Peltier Lake through the Sentinel Lake program, before and after the drawdown, will provide a very detailed dataset for studying how lakes like Peltier respond to nutrient stressors and drawdown as a management option. Additional information about the Peltier Lake TMDL can be found in the TMDL report (EOR, 2013); information about the drawdown feasibility study can be found on the drawdown in the technical memorandum developed during the study (HEI, 2015). 2 116 RCWD anRI(E (REEK WATERSHED DISTRICT FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS WHAT IS THE PURPOSE OF THE DRAWDOWN? The purpose of the drawdown is to improve the overall water quality in Peltier Lake by allowing near -shore sediments to freeze, dry out, and kill cudyleaf pondweed, as well as reoxygenate and consolidate sediments for native plants. WHEN WILL THE DRAWDOWN BEGIN? The drawdown is tentatively planned to begin after Labor Day weekend. It is likely the drawdown will begin on or around September 19th. WHAT IS THE RATE OF THE DRAWDOWN? The drawdown is expected to occur slowly, at a rate of just under 1 inch per day. HOW FAR WILL THE LAKE BE DRAWN DOWN? The lake will be drawn down approximately 3 feet below the ordinary high water elevation. WHAT IS THE AMOUNT OF LAKE 80TTOM THAT WILL BE EXPOSED AFTER THE DRAWDOWN? Approximately 199 acres of the near -shore lake bottom will be exposed once the drawdown is completed. This represents about 34% of the lake bottom area. Figure 1 shows an estimate of what the drawn down lake footprint will look like. WILL THE ICE BE SAFE DURING THE WINTER? Once the drawdown is completed, the lake will freeze over as normal. The same ice safety precautions apply to the area of the lake near the aeration system. HOW LONG WITH THE DRAWDOWN LAST? The drawdown is anticipated to begin after Labor Day weekend (approximately September 19, 2016). It is expected that the lake will take approximately 51 days to reach its lowest level. The lake will remain at this level until ice out (typically mid-March to mid-April), when the stop logs will be replaced in the dam and the lake will be allowed to fill to its normal water levet. HOW WILL THE DRAWDOWN AFFECT BOAT REMOVAL? The drawdown has been scheduled to begin and take place at the end of the typical recreational boating season (after Labor Day). Although the drawdown rate is low (about 1 inch per day), it is highly likely that the Peltier Lake boat launch will become unusable at some point (i.e. the ramp will not extend far enough into the lake). Some preplanning should be taken by boat owners and lakeshore residents prior to ensure that boat removal is completed prior to the start of the drawdown. HOW LONG WILL THE LAKE TAKE TO REFILL? The lake will very likely refill within a few weeks, dependent upon the amount of snowmelt and the size of spring rainfall events occurring during the refill period. WILL THE DRAWDOWN RESULT IN ANY FLOODING IMPACTS, EITHER DURING THE DRAWDOWN OR DURING THE REFILLING? 4 `SVA RCWD RICE CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT The feasibility study performed by RCWD has indicated that there is little to no impact downstream of Peltier Lake as a result of the drawdown. The drawdown will not cause any flooding to occur. The refilling will not cause any flood issues. WHAT IMPACT WILL THE DRAWDOWN HAVE ON FISH AND WILDLIFE? Anoka County currently operates a reaeration system within Pettier Lake to minimize fish kill during the winter. The aerator will be used to minimize winterkill during the drawdown. Since the drawdown is proposed during fall and winter months, there should be no impact to the seasonal heron rookery. WILL THE DRAWDOWN OF PELTIER LAKE IMPACT THE LAKE LEVELS IN CENTERVILLE LAKE? St. Paul Regional Water Services owns a culvert and small dam under Main Street that connects Peltier to Centerville. Stop logs will be used in this structure to maintain current water levels on Centerville Lake and therefore Centerville Lake will not be drawn down. The structure will also ensure water does not flow from Peltier to Centerville, during the refilling of Peltier Lake in the spring of 2017. WILL THE DRAWDOWN RESULT IN SEDIMENT BUILDUP BEHIND THE PEL TIER LAKE DAM OR DOWNSTREAM OF THE DAM? The RCWD is evaluating the sediment behind the dam and will implement the necessary actions during the drawdown to minimize sediment buildup behind the dam and sediment transport downstream of the dam. WILL THE DRAWDOWN HAVE ANY EFFECT ON LOCAL GROUNDWATER LEVEL AND WELLS? The lake drawdown depth is approximately 3 feet. The Minnesota County Well Index indicates that domestic groundwater wells within the vicinity of Peltier Lake typically range from 60 to 100 feet deep and are accessing deeper, water bearing aquifers. The bottom of these wells are much deeper than the drawdown elevation of the lake. Therefore, the drawdown is not expected to affect the nearby groundwater wells. WILL THE EXISTING DAM BE REMOVED OR ALTERED? No, the drawdown will be performed by removing stop logs from an outlet structure that is part of the dam. This will create a small section of the dam that is approximately 3 feet lower than the top of the dam, allowing the lake water to outlet through this section until the lake level is even with the bottom of the outlet structure. HOW IS THE DRAWDOWN PROJECT BEING FUNDED AND WHAT WILL IT COST? A feasibility study of the drawdown was funded and completed by the Rice Creek Watershed District (RCWD) in 2015, costing approximately $19,000. The actual drawdown will also be funded by the RCWD and will cost approximately $25,000. The RCWD pays for this using District tax revenue and projects of this nature are considered part of the RCWD normal operating budget. No new money or additional assessment were made to pay for this work. WILL THERE BE ANY ADDITIONAL PUBLIC MEETINGS? Other than the July 7, 2016 public meeting referenced in the Landowner Approval Packet, no additional public meetings are expected at this time. 118 Teresa Bender From: Mike Ericson Sent: Tuesday, April 25, 201711:28 AM To: D Love; Jeff Paar, Matthew Montain; Russell Koski; Steve King Cc: Teresa Bender, Kris Sweeney; Charles Roberts; Paul Palzer; Greg Burmeister, Tedd Peterson; Dan Schmitz; Statz, Mark; Kurt B. Glaser, Ellie Paulseth Subject: CR 14 & 20th Ave in Centerville Attachments: CSAH 14-54 FYA Analysis 101215.pdf; ATT00001.htm; FYA TOD CR 14 & 20st Ave a-35E).xlsx, ATT00002.htm From: Rhonda Sivarajah [mailto:Rhonda.Sivaraiah@co.anoka.mn.usJ Sent: Tuesday, April 25, 2017 10:42 AM To: Jeff Paar <JPaar@CENTERVILLEMN.com>; Mike Ericson <MEricson @CENTERVILLEMN.com> Subject: Fwd: CR 14 & 20th Ave in Centerville The yellow flashing arrow is finally done! Sent from my Whone Begin forwarded message: From: "Doug Fischer" <Doug.Fischer@co.anoka.mn.us> To: "Rhonda Sivarajah" <Rhonda.Sivaraiah@co.anoka.mn.us> Subject: FW: CR 14 & 20th Ave in Centerville The Flashing Yellow Arrow Phasing of the Main Street/21"` Avenue Signal is now operational! Douglas W. Fischer, P.E. Transportation Division Manager/County Engineer Anoka County Transportation Division Highway -Transit -Surveyor -GIS -Fleet 1440 Bunker Lake Boulevard NW Andover, MN 55304 www.anokacounty.us Please note that effective April 13, 20171 will have new phone numbers: Direct Dial: 763-324-3103 Main Office: 763-324-3100 Fax: 763-324-3020 doue.fischer@co.anoka.mn.us Our passion is your safe way home! 120 From: Jane Rose Sent: Tuesday, April 25, 2017 8:35 AM To: Doug Fischer <Doug.Fischer@co.anoka.mn.us> Subject: FW: CR 14 & 20th Ave in Centerville Hi Doug See below and attached - The signal will run protected -only in all 4 directions from 6:45-8:00am and 3:15-6 and FYA during the remaining hours. (John was more conservative had recommended 6-10am and 3-7pm as protected only) From: Stromgren, Nicole (DOT)(mailto:nicole.stromsren@state.mn.us] Sent: Monday, April 10, 2017 4:05 PM To: Jane Rose <1ane.RosePco.anoka.mn.us>; Sean Thiel <Sean.Thiel@co.anoka.mn.us> Cc: Schwartz, Kevin (DOT) <kevin.schwartz@state. mn.us> Subject: CR 14 & 20th Ave in Centerville Hi Jane/Sean, We are planning on turning on the new FYA signal at CR14 V& Ave in Centerville either tomorrow or Wednesday. I understand that the signal will run protected -only FREE until all the left -turn loops are installed but we wanted to keep you in the loop on how we plan to operate the FYA after the loops are all installed, given that you are the owner (we operate the signal on a reimbursable basis for the county). I have attached the analysis that John Gray from SEH dated October 2015 where he made suggestions on FYA left -turn operation. After completing an analysis of our own we would suggest that the signal run protected -only in all 4 directions from 6:45-8:00am and 3:15-6:15pm because these are the peak hour coordination time -frames. Outside of these times the signal would run protected -permissive in all directions. I have attached a copy of our FYA TOD spreadsheet for the intersection that we use in determining FYA phasing by time -of -day as well as a summary of the FYA Operations Summary. If you have any questions please let me know. Thanks, Nicole Stromgren, P.E . Signal Operations Engineer MnDOT Metro District Traffic Engineering 1500 County Road 82 West Roseville, MN 55113 Office: 651-234-7832 Cell: 651-775-3203 nicole.strom-gren@state.mn.us Click here to report this email as spam. 121 NOTICE: Unless restricted by law, email correspondence to and from Anoka County government offices may be public data subject to the Minnesota Data Practices Act and/or may be disclosed to third parties. This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service. For more information please visit http://www.symanteccloud.com 122 -A SEH Building a Better World for All of Us® October 12, 2015 Ms. Jane Rose Traffic Engineering Manager Anoka County Highway Department 1440 Bunker Lake Boulevard NW Andover, Minnesota 55304 Dear Jane: RE: Anoka County, Minnesota CSAR 14 at CSAR 54 Signal System Flashing Yellow Arrow Considerations SEH No. ANOKC 122928 As requested, we reviewed the intersection of CSAR 14 (Main Street) and CSAH 54 (201s Avenue North) in the Cities of Centerville and Lino Lakes with regards to proposed modification of the existing intersection traffic signal left turn operations. Recently, the County has received requests from the public to have flashing yellow arrow operation installed and activated at this intersection. In response to these requests, the County had SEH perform an analysis of the intersection to determine if flashing yellow arrow operation can be utilized here. The analysis would include review of the feasibility, cost, and safety of the intersection for flashing yellow arrow operations. Following is the results of our analysis. This 4 -legged intersection was first signalized in 2007, with protected left turn phasing installed for all approaches. The posted speed limit on CSAH 14 is 45 mph, while the north leg of CSAH 54 is posted at 55 mph and the south leg of CSAH 54 is posted at 50 mph. All iptersection approaches have a single separate dedicated left turn lane, except that the southbound CSAH 54 approach has a dual left tum lane. The County provided SEH with limited turning movement traffic count information (completed for 9:30- 11:00 am on April 8, 2007). However, we had concerns about the traffic volumes shown on this count summary for this time of day given local development and typical area traffic patterns, as well as the age of the count itself. The southbound CSAR 54 left and right turning traffic volumes for 10:00-11:00 am were much higher than would be anticipated for this area. To address these concerns, SEH performed an AM and PM peak hour traffic count during the week of October 5-9, 2015. An AM peak hour traffic count was taken on Wednesday, October 7, 2015 between 7:00-8:00 am while a PM peak hour traffic count was taken on Monday, October 5, 2015 between 4:00-5:00 pm. As shown on the attached count summary, current peak hour traffic volumes were much lower for all movements to and from the north (eastbound left turns, westbound right turns, and all southbound movements) than shown on the 2007 count. For our analysis of the intersection, we utilized the 2015 counts but also will mention the 2007 count in our review. SEH also obtained crash data for the intersection for the most recent 3 years of available crash data (2012- 2014) from the State's crash website. SEH then completed a brief field review of the signal system to confirm that the existing traffic signal plans correspond to the current installation of the signal system and take into account , the current intersection geometrics. SEH also reviewed traffic signal cabinet Engineers I Architects I Planners I Scientists .Short Elliott Hendrickson Inc., 3535 Vadnais Center Drive, St. Paul&MN.55110-5196 SEN is 100% employee -owned I sehinc.com I 651.490.2000 I 800.325.2055 � �r •8$8.908.8166 fax 123 Ms. Jane Rose October 12, 2015 Page 2 components to determine if additional electrical equipment would be required to be provided in order to allow for flashing yellow arrow operation to be used. As part of the signal system installation, each intersection approach was set up to operate with protected left turn phasing (3 -section RLA-YLA-GLA signals). The intersection has a newer TS2-Type 1 controller cabinet and an Econolite ASC -3 controller, both of which are compatible with upgraded left turn (i.e. flashing yellow arrow) operations. There are sufficient load switch bays open and available to add flashing yellow arrow operation without significant modifications to the existing controller cabinet. Finally, the conflict monitor (Reno MMU -1600) is an older model but is capable of operating flashing yellow arrows for all intersection approaches. Regarding the conflict monitor (and all other controller cabinet equipment), we contacted Traffic Control Corporation to confirm that these items are compatible for flashing yellow arrow operations. Traffic Control Corporation suggested that the County may want to consider upgrading the conflict monitor to a newer MMU- 1600GE model which has a display screen for more efficient diagnosis of any traffic signal related issues (the 1600 model does not have the display screen). Estimated cost to upgrade the conflict monitor is around $1,200. However, upgrading the conflict monitor is NOT required for flashing -yellow arrow operation. As part of our analysis, SEH utilized the Minnesota Department of Transportation's (MnDOT) flashing yellow arrow installation criteria from their "Traffic Signal Timing and Coordination Manual' to analyze extended usage of flashing yellow arrow operations for each intersection approach. A copy of this criteria is attached for your information. Based on comparison of available data with the MnDOT criteria, the following can be inferred: The design of this signal system likely included the initial recommendation of protected left turn phasing for each intersection approach due to the higher posted speed limits on each approach (as is typical Anoka County practice). As mentioned above, posted speed limits range from 45 mph on CSAH 14 to 50-55 mph on CSAH 54. With regards to utilizing Flashing Yellow Arrow operations for each left turn movement, the following should be noted: According to the current edition of the AASHTO Geometric Design of Highways and Streets manual, left -turning drivers "need sufficient sight distance to decide when it is safe to turn left across the lanes used by opposing traffic." This stopping sight distance along CSAH 14 for the design/posted speed of 45 mph is at least 360 feet of clear sight distance to the east and west. For northbound CSAH 54, the recommended stopping sight distance at 50 mph is as least 425 feet to the north. For southbound CSAH 54, the recommended stopping sight distance at 55 mph is least 495 feet to the south. Based on a field review of intersection geometries, each intersection approach is straight for several hundred feet in each direction with no impediments to the sight distance (other than possible sun issues for eastbound traffic in the AM peak hour and for westbound traffic in the PM peak hour during fall -winter months). Based on this information, available stopping sight distance meets this criteria for each intersection approach. • Based on the recent crash history at this intersection, only I crash was reported between 2012 and 2014. This crash was a property damage right angle crash between southbound 124 Ms. Jane Rose October 12, 2015 Page 3 and eastbound traffic that occurred in 2013, with the cause of the crash being disregarding of the signal system by the eastbound vehicle. Thus, there does not appear to be a safety concern at this intersection with the presence of signalized operation. One of the recommendations from the MnDOT Rafflc Signal Timing and Coordination Manual is to utilize Vrotected left turn phasing only either for situations where the posted speed limit exceeds 45 mph and the peak hour left turning volume is greater than 240 vehicles per hour, or for when the cross product between the northbound left turn traffic volume and the southbound through traffic volume exceeds 80,000. With regards to the most recent available traffic counts: a. Between the hours of 7:00 am -8:00 am and also 4:00 pm -5:00 pm of the most recent traffic counts, westbound left turn volumes exceeded 150 vehicles per hour (peaking at 208 left turns between 7-8 am). No other intersection approach exceeded 100 left turning vehicles per hour. b. In the 2007 traffic counts, left turns for southbound traffic between 10:00 am -11:00 am approached 300 vehicles per hour. No other left turn count in these counts exceeded 110 vehicles per hour. c. For the AM peak hour in 2015, the cross product between westbound left turn traffic volumes and eastbound through traffic volumes exceeded 80,000 (96,304). For all other movements with both the 2007 and 2015 counts, no hour had a cross product exceeding 80,000. Following up against the flashing yellow arrow criteria from the MnDOT Traffic Signal Timing and Coordination Manual: Left turn lanes line up well for each intersection approach with sufficient turning room in the intersection so that left turn paths were not conflicting. This was observed specifically for the southbound dual left turn and northbound single left turn movement where protected left turn phasing was run together for these movements with no conflicts between either direction's left turn movements. Eastbound and westbound left turn movements are offset far enough such that no conflicts in left turn paths are occurring. 2. Only the southbound approach has two left turn lanes. For this approach, the MnDOT Manual suggests that protected operation be utilized during the higher volume periods of the day with Engineering judgment being used to determine if flashing yellow operation could be used for all other times of the day. 3. There are less than 3 opposing lanes of traffic facing each intersection approach. 4. The intersection does not have a high crash rate and there is no significant history of right angle crashes involving left turning traffic. In summary, as there is no significant crash history for left turning traffic and traffic volumes are likely lower for the entire intersection (outside of the peak traffic periods), the County should be able to 125 Ms. Jane Rose October 12, 2015 Page 4 consider using Flashing Yellow Arrow operations at this intersection throughout much of a typical weekday and throughout the weekend. In addition, any changes to the operation of the left turn signal phases are not anticipated to impact overall operations of the intersection in a negative way (and delays for left turning traffic will decrease with flashing yellow arrow operations which will improve the overall operation of the intersection). For peak traffic periods though (and for when sun becomes an issue for eastbound and westbound traffic), protected left turn operation is strongly recommended to be implemented. Note that for the existing signal system to the east along CSAH 14 (at 2111 Avenue North), the signal system has flashing yellow arrow capability. However, during peak traffic periods, this signal system is operated in protected left turn mode. Some modifications to the existing signal system installation will be required to revise the operation of this signal system and add flashing yellow arrows for each intersection approach. Both overhead end mounted and far left pole mounted left turn signals for each intersection approach will required having 3 - section RLA-YLA-GLA signal heads replaced with 4 -section RLA-YLA-FYLA-GLA signal heads. For the southbound approach, due to the dual left turn lane, a 5 -foot extension will.be required to be added to the southwest mast arm so that two 4 -section overhead signals can be installed and centered on each left turn lane (requirement that each approaching left turn lane have its own flashing yellow arrow signal centered on each left turn lane). Some additional cabling (6/6#14) will be required to be installed to operate these signal heads based on a review of the field wiring diagram. No additional through traffic signal heads will be required to be installed as each approaching through lane has its own separate signal centered on the lane. With regards to left turn lane detection, the MnDOT Traffic Control Signal Design Manual recommends that either four loop detectors be installed for proper detection (at 5', 20' 35' and 50' from the stop bar or crosswalk) or that two separately wired loop detectors be installed for existing signal system retrofits at 10' and 40' from the stop bar or crosswalk. For this signal system, left turn lane detection was installed at 0' and 15' from the stop bar (wired together as one loop detector). To provide better coverage, fall back detection should one channel of left turn lane detection fail, and meet MnDOT criteria for flashing yellow arrow detection, we recommend that one additional loop detector (separately wired and operated on a separate channel in the controller cabinet) be furnished and installed in each left turn lane. The two stop bar loop detectors can be left as is on one channel, with a second loop detector being installed at 40 feet from the stop bar and wired separately. This would require that 5 additional loop detectors, five new 2/c#14 cables, and three 2 -channel loop detector cards be installed to bring these loop detector installations up to current flashing yellow arrow design and operational standards. To allow for flashing yellow arrow operation, we estimate that these modifications (completed by an electrical signal contractor) will cost approximately $28,500. This does not include potential conflict monitor upgrade. A detailed preliminary engineer's estimate of costs is attached to this letter for your information. Overall, we do not see any issues with installation and operation of flashing yellow arrows for each intersection approach. However, should the County implement flashing yellow arrow modifications to this signal system, we recommend that the signal system operate with protected left turns during both the AM peak period (6:00-10:00 am) and the PM peak period (3:00-7:00 pm) due to significant traffic volumes and higher posted speeds through this area. For all other hours of the day and for all weekend hours, the County should be able to consider using flashing yellow arrow operations. 126 Ms. Jane Rose October 12, 2015 Page 5 Note that any changes in the operation of this signal system should be monitored by the County, including annual review of crash data to ensure that crash frequency does not increase due to modified left turn signal operations. Please review our analysis and feel free to contact me at 651.490.2073 with any questions or concerns that you may have related to our analysis. We hope that this information provides you with insight needed to help evaluate and implement the appropriate left turn operations for this intersection. Sincerely, SHORT ELLIOTT HENDRICKSON INC. 7 John M. Gray, PE Project Engineer Enclosures 127 Estimated Costs and Quantities Revise Signal System (FYA Modifications) CSAH 14 at CSAH 54 Prepared by JMG (SEH) on October 12, 2015 Item Estimated Estimated Estimated Quantity Unit Cost Total Cost Remove 3 -Section Signals 8 $300 $2,400 4 -Section Signals (with LED) 9 $800 $7,200 5 -Foot Extension 1 $1,500 $1,500 Mid -Mast Arm Mount (for SB traffic) 1 $1,000 $1,000 R10 -X12 Sign Panels 4 $500 $2,000 Controller Cabinet Modifications 1 $1,000 $1,000 6 x 6 NMC Loop Detectors 5 $1,200 $6,000 6/c#14 Cable (to poles 2, 3, 4) 800, $2 $1,600 2/c#14 Cable (to left turn loops) 1000, $1 $1,000 Traffic Control 1 $1,000 $1,000 Sub Total $24,700 Miscellaneous 15% $3,800 Total Estimated Revise Signal System Costs Optional Conflict Monitor Upgrade 128 $28,500 $1,200 LED SIGNAL INDICATIONS ' LIE SEE SHEET N0. FACE R Y 0 RLTA YLTA T 1-1 1-2 •4- -/•- •4•+ 1r1 2.2 2-0 2.4 e e • A • 3-1.32 •4-. f 7t-z' 4-1.4-2,4-3 0 0 0 . L 3 - POW MOUNTED ONE -RAY SIONA(S AT 4S- . © 23- 2 - TORR PEOWMIAH nwZcATIQK arum D AT 4S• 225• (SEE DETAIL) 6-I 6-2.6-3.6••4 . e • -4. 7-1.T-2 •4-' •F-' �•. e-i,e-z,s-a a e TYPE D SIGN -68Z SIpCDA DETAIL -Act ICLE L316NAL IN100'e" I7MM 7 31Cn 1..gg�yq�R1 IRC -10 WE MAY 2t5/C 012 99-41"OKE ONE RAY sHALL� :2" tED MITT1 BA7acptata(D sxlEt.Os. " � •1709 PAIDO-A80-030.9 [DN AT 550-2 N 4O'S O PO E FT)VNDATIDN MATCH s - aNE AY szGNAts CaVER11EAD1 (O•, 12' AND 24• FROM EIA MASS tO'ONE RAY EYP DETECTOR24-FRO AND FROM am � HOT ) PtSc LIE SEE SHEET N0. D 265, M 3 -ONE Y SIGNALS (OVERHEAD) (01. 12' AND 24' FROM END OF MAST ARM) 26_ 4S` AND tIE A • 7t-z' 50 V X.P.'230 MATT H.P,B.Y - PaSICRIAM PUSH 8D77DN3TYP9 DET1-SLCf1 . L 3 - POW MOUNTED ONE -RAY SIONA(S AT 4S- . © 23- 2 - TORR PEOWMIAH nwZcATIQK arum D AT 4S• 225• (SEE DETAIL) 0 8iDN3EE e3TfAVINO ffRB-lt) BAY -4. O s. CVIA HR 22) WI7R. 3-1/C 0s 6-12/( 2 TYPE D SIGN -68Z SIpCDA DETAIL - 7 31Cn 1..gg�yq�R1 IRC -10 WE MAY 2t5/C 012 99-41"OKE ONE RAY �C2 2• RSC " � .. V G 1-0/C K CLUM.) 12/0 014 I -0/C nu S y T N s-1 012 P(AHBUTT01( STATION i -3/C 012 PIM DUT'TON PIXNAATIdt 2-3/c 012 CLERK )1 1 - PSD. PB AAM fR30-4b) � KO n//onENK7"H-Ar. 4 -ASC 'b�•31%C M22 4 00000000��IJ� 2.155/9 012 ztc1-3/C M2 tLtRL ) C 3-a C +.14 - a-0 Ko ss S.A.H. 14 (MAIN ST.) ---- 12, 9 0 93+06 EYP a N C45 M.P.H.) 12• 6"4 14M EYP zn z / J (1 I o E � p tW 1 C3 C3 54407 EVP 22 11 ODO0oa =�tlC 014 2LJ (J Q n4 Z -0/C "722 ♦ `\ a J 1 i Rf �\ 1-14/c 412 CLUM.) 3M%C •-224 a CONTROLLER PHASING, PEDESTRIAN INDICATIONS & PUSHBUTTON LAYOUT a „ %s',. TYPE PAlOD-ARS-9 COATI)' AT 330• i - W t PA10D POLE ARS -030-9 ? 0 I 0 3 -ANE MAY SIGNALS (OVERN@AD) < 11 S (0', SB- A" 30' FROM END OF MAST 1A AM CQwW Wr) WO07MAST ARM) LZI 2 ` ��PS�6-2 tja PBB•- •315•,013 -• MOLWTO AND �E-•MAY SIGNALS AT %2.1MiPS-2 PS 2 - COIR7YDOWN PEDESTRIAN IIAICAII I1 (I.' ,,11 © 4S' AND 225- (SEE DETAILI A.H.414 •'---n UbCWAVIE 2 PPSEST- 25 P(AM •P.S. �M . ,T P�D %—s3 TYP9 D SItRFdEE SItRtlNG OETAXL 1-6ION (R6 -1L1 ONE WAY T i- -6TGN (R6 -1p) OME MAY y w ST�OAI C.S.MH. 1 � I7tT0 HiF31, WSTH- ¢ o. gt \ P�MAIN sr.) p M•n12CL(N.) O IM420 U W O PBM _ � � PBB 1 O � -•• P84-2 02"1 FLASH ALL R PHAPHASES 2 i 6 MATCH LINE "8" sn..r t Ra ED AR6 VEHICLE SEE SHEET N0.266 w .r r.i n 6P..7••4•R4.CGIL . (.4.. gram 0. HOLT. Ayp/b0. A0RLM1 $. P01TER 2 _ 1 d►Di6 2>-33/0 0112 ' l 1-0/C •12 CLUM.) ' 4• RSC 6$/C 014 6.4/C 014 )—In no TYPE PA100-ASO-D30-9 (DAVIT AT 330•) OPA1 ppy FOIMDATION' 3 MAY SIRS (DEAD OFD) t0•,— ARD 24• FROM ND ARM) SEE SHEET 265 FOR NOTES. ONE A EVP DETECTOR ARD TORY LIGHT �C (6• FROM 970 OF MAST ARM) =2/C 014 © 423 P" MOMOUNTED ONE -RAY SIGNALS AT 2 - COUNTDOWN PEDESTRLW INDICATIONS 1MMM AT 45• S, 225- tSEE DETAIL) L(BCIpNAM EtR-IA2NSO WATT H.P.S. X • TYPE D $IOM+�EPS26NIN6'06TAIL RSC 1-6I6N tR6-1R) SNI IVAY /C n4 E)MM INTO HH -6 MIM• Mir, ia// LOOP DETECTOR CHART DIST ONATION 5278 F1R7CTSON 07'00 LINE 01-1 1 2.0 x 6• b2-S,D2-2 1 I -6-x 6' 1 (1) 1 300- 03-1 •x 6• I (I) O',Ia- DT-2 z -6•x s• FUNCTIONS, - De i,De z :-6•x 6' (1) - CALL AND EXTEND 131 - EXTEND ONLY I71 - U EDIATE WEND. DELAY 0411. D8,.6 6'x e• 18) - DENSITY ONLY ANOrA COUNT. CoxsULTTNG 7NIER4mm LAYa(T C.S.A.H. 14 GROUP, INC. C S A N. 54 f2�01H sr.) MEET 264 OF 492 TYPE FALOO-MB-030-0 (DAt2Y AT 330-) Q9 1 PASoo POL9 FUMATIM \..% 9q(Jlp we rip gQ DEYAML � O UM AND CABMitr , 3 -ONE Y SIGNALS (OVERHEAD) (01. 12' AND 24' FROM END OF MAST ARM) mcf1m 4" RSC 2m HR -1 I(ITM. 5-22/0 012, 3-3/0 012 ONE MAY MVP DETECTOR AND CONFIRMATORY LIGHT Co' FROM EIA OF MAST ARM) 7.2/0 014, 2-0/O KO EXTEND 41 RSC INTO HU -10 Wm. . L 3 - POW MOUNTED ONE -RAY SIONA(S AT 4S- . © 23- 2 - TORR PEOWMIAH nwZcATIQK arum D AT 4S• 225• (SEE DETAIL) 5-12/0 012, Y -3/o 012 8-2/c K4, 2-3/0 •Eo 2 RSC TO SIGNAL SERVICE DABINET -4. O s. CVIA HR 22) WI7R. 3-1/C 0s 6-12/( 2 TYPE D SIGN -68Z SIpCDA DETAIL 2" 4 3- RSC STMEW Our t1HRRADED 7 31Cn 1..gg�yq�R1 IRC -10 WE MAY 2t5/C 012 99-41"OKE ONE RAY AND CAPPED XOTH ENDS) 0K2A ♦ mcnm INTO NH -4 ML(N. B SY,t � SERVICE CABINET TO. HH-= WM* 3- Rsc Pf�+" I'33�G �Z pp��y�A .I%T 2-3/C 012 (LWL) 2D -..pp//1*� 2 -0/C (=ptWM,f""0 S Vr� 2-3/C -12lam 82 WAL) TO HH -1 W! u//7r P� Szom SERVICE CABINET TO S.O.P. ���ESSCC B (VIA HH -21) WITH. 3-1/c K /�'.�)g5.0 P. -MOOD PIXaE t AND ya•THE AD " •1 SIC 2(t.DJ` .h`` O 2- RSG 3- 2 EXTEND 21 RSC 2-i!C n4 To 10-21 WITH. 3-I/C K C3 RSC N1" 4- RSC -S/C •12 to fLUH. )_,• 5 •14 g -.33/C awy222 (LUII.) w V N 0-2/C �••_ 7-4/C +31 12. C3 02-1 r— 11• x • =W W C.S.A.H. 14 (MAIN ST.) F y O ) M.P.H.) —(�. C345 1E. W 2 _ 1 d►Di6 2>-33/0 0112 ' l 1-0/C •12 CLUM.) ' 4• RSC 6$/C 014 6.4/C 014 )—In no TYPE PA100-ASO-D30-9 (DAVIT AT 330•) OPA1 ppy FOIMDATION' 3 MAY SIRS (DEAD OFD) t0•,— ARD 24• FROM ND ARM) SEE SHEET 265 FOR NOTES. ONE A EVP DETECTOR ARD TORY LIGHT �C (6• FROM 970 OF MAST ARM) =2/C 014 © 423 P" MOMOUNTED ONE -RAY SIGNALS AT 2 - COUNTDOWN PEDESTRLW INDICATIONS 1MMM AT 45• S, 225- tSEE DETAIL) L(BCIpNAM EtR-IA2NSO WATT H.P.S. X • TYPE D $IOM+�EPS26NIN6'06TAIL RSC 1-6I6N tR6-1R) SNI IVAY /C n4 E)MM INTO HH -6 MIM• Mir, ia// LOOP DETECTOR CHART DIST ONATION 5278 F1R7CTSON 07'00 LINE 01-1 1 2.0 x 6• b2-S,D2-2 1 I -6-x 6' 1 (1) 1 300- 03-1 •x 6• I (I) O',Ia- DT-2 z -6•x s• FUNCTIONS, - De i,De z :-6•x 6' (1) - CALL AND EXTEND 131 - EXTEND ONLY I71 - U EDIATE WEND. DELAY 0411. D8,.6 6'x e• 18) - DENSITY ONLY ANOrA COUNT. CoxsULTTNG 7NIER4mm LAYa(T C.S.A.H. 14 GROUP, INC. C S A N. 54 f2�01H sr.) MEET 264 OF 492 LOOP DETECTOR CHART DIST ONATION 5278 F1R7CTSON 07'00 LINE 01-1 1 2.0 x 6• b2-S,D2-2 1 I -6-x 6' 1 (1) 1 300- 03-1 •x 6• I (I) O',Ia- DT-2 z -6•x s• FUNCTIONS, - De i,De z :-6•x 6' (1) - CALL AND EXTEND 131 - EXTEND ONLY I71 - U EDIATE WEND. DELAY 0411. D8,.6 6'x e• 18) - DENSITY ONLY ANOrA COUNT. CoxsULTTNG 7NIER4mm LAYa(T C.S.A.H. 14 GROUP, INC. C S A N. 54 f2�01H sr.) MEET 264 OF 492 DT-2 z -6•x s• FUNCTIONS, - De i,De z :-6•x 6' (1) - CALL AND EXTEND 131 - EXTEND ONLY I71 - U EDIATE WEND. DELAY 0411. D8,.6 6'x e• 18) - DENSITY ONLY ANOrA COUNT. CoxsULTTNG 7NIER4mm LAYa(T C.S.A.H. 14 GROUP, INC. C S A N. 54 f2�01H sr.) MEET 264 OF 492 MEET 264 OF 492 RED _no C OOLLER YEL CAB NET O O® s� REED 2e C JC 7CJ C JC3CJ P6-1 Pa 2 CRN 'muaM A�l.q - aYELm RNTEU 19 20 f 3goo -1 QkT,, "910 YEL 'j �''+ RED 28 29 37 39 Npjw EU + °� P2-1� ETECTOR a SPR 29pppc YLTA -2 P6-1 �T��B(C i7P8-! v �940PB8-1 PB2-2 ' 61+98 EVP !.TONT 11 P6-2 �n7CT•A 21 1Y SPR goo 02+05 EVP LIMT M405 EVP DETECTOR LUMINAIRE 9 tl�(PBe a"'P'�'i rr y�y��,, 30 31 2PB9-1 41 42 5 6-1 0RH 10 01+06 EVP DE7ECTINt P84 UMSNASRE . P84-2 PBZ -1 5 - O 11 01+06 EVP LlMff 0 b1Y1C 30 !E a 22 a Ps"PB4-1 SPQR sp4Rt 93+08 EVP LI RS+08 EVP DEIEOTOR 04+97 EVP L1 4+07 EVP DETIOTOR• HH -33 m 13 12 � E4032 33 • ' RR -5 ' HN -6 Y3 Y4 13 mr1l pow 31 LW(INA7AE3 ~ nPas /A DI -1 36 O UMIW`IR S ® 34 16 w-2 D3+A8 EVP LI 32 � L\ n 7 4,37. 49 a � m n 26 04-3 D4 ! SPR •80+08 EVP 33 ' m HH -11 2T W-14 r n 17 DT -1 DETEMM 06-1 34 ^ MR -4 ,• 28 07-2 D6-2 35 9138`08 h 38 HH -10 ' HR -T m HH -37 14 HN -18 RED yG�RN f7E1f 1 RED DL -1 ED �fORN n " T v D9 -i 47 4T. 48 43 08-3 04-3 1g YlL -2 pl ELD TO HH -20 ri NN -1 03..1 is 44 ' H HN -12 16 15 04 3 NEU - ORM 3T V 5,6 • -TA 7-1 CCTV 5-i �Y�t� 28-48 v ' �• TA v p EQO MR -8 m i' RR -39 m m am RNLE�U J:Z 06-3ffi ��•4-{j.' m 34 3'1 HH -2 ^� HR -S3 16 AH -19 20 • N SPR 09,•2 P2-z,J NWLK _ I- DISC, 38 �VI� ��� 02-1 23 b4-1 NEU 11'T 3-2 SO b8-1 08-8 lEU q RITA 3 IUMSNAIRE ' 6 D2-2 17-1 39 b7-2 E RFD 2-1 03_1TITA EQO 8LK 39 P8-1-{ DCox 4 ® n LUNWAIAE n ® ! RRi � 49 CONDUCTOR COLOR CODING v�-�..ir».e 21 { 0"j _J"'P2-1 23 NEU EVP LItaJT P2VXj 40 LUIRNAIRE D6-1 34 08-2 . s—•-• SPR MM 24 3PR SPR 04+07 EVP, P89-1 82+59 EVP LIE 41 S ® 33 46 DB -1 2/= t- SPR 23 OETEt:TOR . NEU SPR LWSNAIRE D6-2 '$ C'12 mauimp CABLE m HH -20 ERIN. 26 D2-1 02+05 EYP 42 6 9.6 TO HR -1 22 Mpj 1 27 D2'3 DE7ELTWt HH�21 3; l 7.27 PB1-2 DS -1 RN-22INptt73- �P2VNEEkk 1 1 1 SOP • �_anr.i Z�Y0�0 SIGNAL 3- 2 2 2 SS�tAI SERVICE SERVICE 'F SHALL 9E ARWWOEO AS SPECIM ABOVE. yb t ""I°'>...+. "'°'t�sr.�".ar�i+.i," °n" .e+4rt�. v."'�•.+anjn�r wn..�r w,r.r..�..+ °m..+��°Y""' '•r. Kr DBA 8r e.BnrrB O frr�fn: mom. r..r'eFi Srwri°�i. P CONSULTING COUNTYSHEET pIpNAO IAOM267 n•38 - — - GxoVP C.S,A.d. i9 OF C-3-A.R. 14 CHAIN Sr.) »�,2 ...w,4 -au„-., ,s4•P.,,,, ,.,, 1n,... B ' .INC. AT. O.S.A.N. 54 MOTH AVE. 0.1 492 Turning Movement Traffic Counts SB CSAH 14 (Main Street) at CSAH 54 (20th Avenue) Lino Lakes, Minnesota WB Total AM Peak Hour Count on October 7, 2015 Thru Right PM Peak Hour Count on October 5, 2015 Thru Right Left Thru NB Volume Time Period Left Thru Right 7:00-7:15 am 7 3 30 7:15-7:30 am 5 4 31 7:30-7:45 am 2 3 44 7:45-8:00 am 2 7 36 Total Count 16 17 141 Peak 15 x 4 28 28 176 4:00-4:15 pm 16 19 60 4:15-4:30 pm 15 28 49 4:30-4:45 pm 16 24 50 4:45-6:00 pm 14 34 45 Total Count 61 105 204 Peak 15 x4 64 136 240 SB ES WB Total Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Volume 26 25 5 6 123 14 47 62 4 352 20 21 5 9 128 11 53 80 4 371 26 33 8 5 100 5 50 90 6 372 20 20 13 0 112 6 58 88 6 368 92 99 31 20 463 36 208 320 20 1463 104 132 52 36 512 56 232 360 24 1740' 14 11 7 11 94 5 32 107 19 395 17 5 0 9 110 5 35 120 17 410 13 3 2 13 89 1 30 112 23 376 16 12 4 9 111 6 59 121 21 452 60 31 13 42 404 17 156 460 80 1633 68 48 28 52 444 24 236 484 92 1916 Anoka County Highway Department Traffic Engineering Traffic Volume and Turning Movement Stud File Name ; TM00705 Weather, Cool and Clear Site Code . ; 07050'- Counter: 7050'Counter: DS -400 Start Date : 04/081. -rated by: Shelley/Andrew Page No : 1 Groups Mintefl-unsfiifled CSAR 54 CSM 14 CSAR 54 CSAR 14 weafhn-and I Nnrfhhmnff t=ncf/v.rHf sbut Time I ten I Th- flea ' left I Th- Hea Left I Th- ' Left I Tin ea App. Exclu. lru r>G 4f t a Total Total t 7ota1 t 30 Total Tota! Total T0ia1 Factor 1 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.01 1.0 L 1.0 1 1.0 1 1.0 1 1.0 1 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1,D 0 2D VY:3V tf 0 4 v le d .lU b u 4f 4 a Y V A-1 0 30 0 U 43 V lzu 7"L8 09;40 12 4 4 0 2D 12 82 7 0 61 2 7 11 0 20 6 29 1 0 86 0 128 128 Total 20 10 8 0 38 20 62 10 a 98 1 15 20 0 41 1 10 64 4 0 781 0 266 266 WAS199 10; 0 26 29 0 163 12 60 6 0 1 5 ! 1 38 10 0 49 60 43 1 0 104) 0 471 471 Gfand 314 110 144 0 668 58 294 276 0 569 92 B1 4B 0 148 118 298 9 0 305 0 1061 1661 Total Approh % 56.3 19.4 25,4 10.4 41,1 48,5 8.1 61.1 30,8 32.3 86.2 2 5 Total % 10,0 6.7 8.7 34.4 3.6 14.2 18,7 34.6 0.7 6.6 2.8 9.0 7.1 14.4 0.5 22.1 0.0 100.0 132 Crash Detail Report LRH Report Version 1.0 March 2010 Crash ID: 132380023 Date. 08/25/2013 Time: 1215 Sys: 04 -CSAR County: ANOKA City: CENTERVILLE Route: 02000014 018+00.528 Severity: PROPERTY DAMAGE Road Type: 4_6 LANES UNDIV 2 -WAY Road Char: STRAIGHT AND LEVEL Crash Type: COLL W/MV IN TRANSPORT Surf Cond: DRY Light Cond: DAYLIGHT Weather 1: CLEAR Weather 2: NOT SPECIFIED Trav Dir: Veh Act: Veh Type: Age: Gender. Cond: Cont Fact Cont Fact Selection Filter: SW LEFT TURN PASSENGER CAR 51 M NORMAL NO IMPROPER DRIVING NOT SPECIFIED First Event: ON ROADWAY To Junction: 4 -LEGGED INTERSECTION Traffic Device: TRAFFIC SIGNALS Speed Limit: 45 Diagram: RIGHT ANGLE Officer: Reliability: CONFIDENT # of Vehicles: 2.00 s E STRAIGHT AHEAD PASSENGER CAR 70 M NORMAL DISREGARD TRAFFIC DEVICE NOT SPECIFIED WORK AREA: COUNTY CODEC62'; 82'; 27','19','027 - FILTER: CRASH YEARC2012'; 2013','20147 - SPATIAL FILTER APPLIED Analyst: Notes: Chad Jorgenson 08/17/2015 MnCMAT 1.0.0 Page 1 of 1 133 Exhibit 4-6 Protected Permissive and FYA Left Turn — Separate Left Turn Lane CHAPTER 4. DETECTION LOOP DETECTOR PLACEMENT PROTECTED/PERMISSIVE AND FLASHING YELLOW LEFT TURN SEPARATE LEFT TURN LANE "SON W01#l' � a1_ • : ' yt • 61111112 NUMBER FUNCTION SIZE I LOCATION Di -1 1 2-1.7x1.7m6'X6' 6 20' 15 2305"d D1-2 1 2 - 1.7 x 1.7m 6' X 6' 5 5' & 11m LOCATION = DISTANCE FROM STOP BAR TO LOOP DETECTOR NOTES: 1) CONTROLLER PHASE AND DETECTOR FUNCTION SHALL BE NON -LOCK MEMORY WITH NO RECALL. 2) USE BACK UP PROTECTION'fO PREVENT LEFT TURN TRAP IF THERE ARE OPPOSING LEFT TURNS. 3) DESIGN SPEED IS 25 MPH. 4) EACH NUMBERED LOOP DETECTOR SHALT. HAVE A SEPARATE LEAD-IN CABLE AND SEPARATE AMPLIFIER. 5) IF USING NMC LOOPS, A SINGLE LARGER LOOP CAN REPLACE THE DUALS. 6) DETEGrOR CROSS SWITCHING MAY BE USED. 7) USE THIS FIGURE IF INSTALLING A FLASHING YELLOW ARROW (FYA). FIGURE 5 MnDOT Traffic Control Signal Design Manual . 4-31 June 2014 134 Exhibit 4-7 Protected Left Turn - Lock Operation — Raised Median CHAPTER 4. DETECTION LOOP DETECTOR PLACEMENT PROTECTED LEFT TURN LOCK OPERATION - RAISED MEDIAN [:IDI -2 ❑ Dl -i �— LOCATION = DISTANCE FROM STOP BAR TO LOOP DETECTOR FRONT LOOP BACK LOOP 3 1' ' NOTES: 1) NO DENSITY FUNCTIONS ARE USED. 2) THE DESIGN SPEED IS 2S MPH. •cX31_ •' nolm U R NUMBER FUNCTIO SIZE Di -1 1 1.7 x 1.7m WX 6' Di -2 1 1.7 x 1.7m 6' X 6' 3) EACH NUMBERED LOOP DETECTOR SHALL HAVE SEPARATE LEAD-IN CABLE AND SEPARATE AMPLIFIER. 4) LOCKING MEMORY SHALL BE USED BY PHASE OR DETECTION FUNCTION. NO CONTROLLER RECALL. 5) THIS CONFIGURATION MAY BE CONSIDERED FOR A FYA OPERATION RETRO -FIT PROJECT. FIGURE 6 MnDOT Traffic Control Signal Design Manual 4-32 135 June 2014 U , w Intersections Design speed (km/h) Metric Intersection sight distance Stopping Passenger cars sight Calculated Design distance (m) rn m Design speed (mph) US Customa Intersection sight distance Stopping Passenger cars sight Calculated Design distance (ft) ft ft 20 20 30.6 35 15 80 121.3 125 30 35 45.9 50 20 115 161.7 165 40 50 61.2 65 .25 155 202.1 205 50 65 76.5 80 30 200 242.6 245 60 85 91.7 95 35 250 283.0 285 70 105 107.0 110 40 305 323.4 325 80 130 122.3 125 45 360 363.8 365 90 160 137.6 140 50 425 404.3 405 100 185 152.9 155 55 4.95 444.7 445 110 220 168.2 170 60 570 485.1 490 120 250 183.5 185 65 645 525.5 530 130 285 198.8 200 70 730 566.0 570 75 820 606.4 610 80 910 646.8 650 Note: Intersection sight .distance shown Is for a passenger car making a left turn from an undivided highway. For other conditions and design vehicles, the time gap should be adjusted and the sight distance recalculated. Exhibit 9-67. Intersection Sight Distance --Case F Left Tarn from Major Road if stopping sight distance has been provided continuously along the major road and if sight distance for Case B (stop control) or Case C (yield control) has been provided for each minor - road approach, sight distance will generally be adequate for left turns from the major road. Therefore, no separate check of sight distance for Case F may be needed. However, at three -leg intersections or driveways located on or near a horizontal curve or crest vertical curve on the major road, the availability of sdequate sight distance for left turns from the major road should be checked. In addition, the availability of sight distance for left turns from divided highways should be checked because of the possibility of sight obstructions in the median. At four -leg intersections on divided highways, opposing vehicles turning left can block a driver's view of oncoming traffic. Ex1u'bit 9-98, presented later in this chapter, illustrates intersection designs that can be used to offset the opposing left -turn lanes and provide left -timing drivers with a better view of oncoming traffic. ' 675 136 Mn/DOT Traffic Signal rming and Coordination Manual Varying Between Protected, Protected/Permissive, and Permissive Operation As discussed above, the FYA can be considered a variable operation signal indication. Consider the following items: ✓ All FYA signals may vary operation between protected, protected/permissive, and permissive operation at various times of the day and night. ✓ Each signal approach will need to be analyzed individually to determine the time -of -day FYA operation by considering the following criteria: a) Cross -product volumes of left turns and opposing throughs at various times of day b) Speed limit c) Sight distance limitations d) Number of opposing through lanes e) Double left turn lanes or single left turn lanes f) Opposing left turn lane offset g) Cross street or mainline approach h) Comprehensive left turn crash analysis of approaches with similar characteristics Test for Protected Only Operation 24 Hours per Day In some cases, the left turn indication should run in the most restrictive Protected -Only mode 24 hours per day. Refer to Exhibit 3-13 for the Protected Only Left Turn Operation Guidelines. If the answer to question 1 or 2 Is "yes", then protected operation should be used throughout the day. Exhibit 3-13 Part 1: Protected -Only Left Turn Operation 24 Hours per Day Part 1: - 24 hrs/dav Guidelines Question 1: Conflicting Left Turns t' Do tfie opQp;frig left turn:paths eon lct� >;I 'tiidari$04 is )fe ; tlieiZ use • TPS 'S«fa PtStgc �l Op¢ at)oh.24 hour's/d0' toY > If the > jlsier �syo; p�o�eed, to the `O n"ei�t pUesflon. Question 2: Limited sight Distance Does the left t� mtr have very Ilmite'd sight dfstahce'as Yes > If th@'ails�ni�r Is Ye§,•then use defirigd In'the current AASHTO "A Policy on Geometric hrptiictdd Opgratlori•24 hours/day. besigns of Highways and Streets"? > if%e arisuv 'i• is liid, pr4ceed to part 2 0 to cheek fo j FYA Icy °rOb. i.jt,l�Htive�' 1s1�~e§# ii(''. �oii �,'o` 2;11s f?ro1 radio 2q hbu�s�dt�... •, �..•'''%',:: `' s �' ,. '4 I f t e, b'S �' j�fb eil It svde'ir )JU�,. P.' . J*'-*' • Y ,., 1 , > • • �• ' �• -'!t. w ..Y. .Ir i:n . ? 1•a•'1. a •1 \v..i�.. y i vl tC t..s j0}'n �7 i'•f �-" �• If the answer is "yes" to any of the questions in Part 1, then Protected -Only operation is suggested throughout the day. If the answer to all of the questions Is "no", then proceed to Part 2 (Exhibit 3-14) to check for permissive FYA operation by time of day. Page 3-28 Local Intersection Concepts May 2011 137 Mn/DOT Traffic Signal Tlming and Coordination Manual Test for FYA Operation by Time of Day Part 2 (Exhibit 3-14) should be performed for each time of day interval. Typically, the evaluation would be for 4 or more intervals throughout the day (AM Peak, Mid-day Peak, PM Peak and Off Peak). Other Intervals can be evaluated as warranted. For the Cross -Product (Question 6) use the highest hourly cross product during the interval evaluated. Exhibit 3-14 Part 2: Permissive FYA Operation by Time of Day Part 2: Time of Day Operation of FYA Start lime End time Question 3: Number of Left Turn Lanes } f • Daes• the left turn have two (2)'0t, more Dries? > -t ie apsjn►ef rjs l(ef; 'rb i ed O.r < ; 'Operetion,fs;p du the . gg� product greater than 80,000 (160,000 If opposing lanep)? O • �fi?g �higr volume t) yes TXt daji :'" • : ` :,(usa Engineeringly' ft er(t.if OePI tUd to a Alf, ieftl#I ;.Pi'o ecc ii aticillis Sii ei+tied .: to run.FYA by, 00k :�0•a :> if t)te answer is No;'�toceed to.�he• • next question: ,: Question 4: Number of Opposing Through Lanes _. _ _.•a. �.•'•sr'..ft••..r.7•'•-xA-,. _. lit .l. 1'_•. +. Dd& the deft -turn face three (3) or mote opposing through -Q' '?� If the;arisuv�'r;(sYes,_f?ro`t„ec 'd es Dries'? . iotls suesteirli!{ijgthe `{ ? t) _ �, Aipgt►V016 nem ilries t e`i ay' • • .` • '' ��use r: riget`i,`• �11d � nt�l�,Uedsibrj 'fo r,''u FYA bYr>t)•'>`: ' , :.' ,!, • ,. r 5zlf eags�nier s.w[,o p 9'' ed.tothe .. Y .4 .�•'T:''�•.•..vYC uesiib: Question 5: Gash History is prQtectdfperniis�sjve opirretori )n glace acid is;there a highxlthjnswgi` f�.jGs;•Pltectgc� ' rWe bi left turn r4lited co0jsioru ' urlig this tInie;interbal ,O ratipii is s �gested fb thl� -ft_ - � testedslo`yoce ' over a 3=year"perforl sui,'e ib(e to correction by p q to:th .. _ only phasing?riext'giiestion; Question 6: Speed and Cross Product Is )i1g Speed 45 NI?H or greater and the PeakNopr left turn > If the-dfigWer is Ves,-Prptected . Yes vblurrie greater than 240 yph oris the peak lout doss • Operatigp is wgge�tea Ibi this TOD: product greater than 80,000 (160,000 If opposing lanep)? O > If the iinsWei: is oto, NA* maybe No possible durio# this tiiAe period. tUd to a Alf, ieftl#I ;.Pi'o ecc ii aticillis Sii ei+tied ilA !§-T (ise�' t n ;Ail Af .QY';• i• - +f , Ifw••PS�.: . ,•,v ,�••1'•• Y '�, �t�`i�it.i� D��•tsis�iotti to j`i]fi F'��, b '�QI)js � � - •f ,iS;eei �9. _ .+�. �•�.i':. .l *. . , j • .t: �'� .�I � �:: , _ . If the �S� rarer- s No'ttf all AUa tiaPs; F1fA iaji be Usgcl diiCiii this ` ods !_.;;.f':'.�a.n3.•9_Li:.•)�u"......._....,.^°s.=34=..%: •.a•. itis'... _.c .. ::i'•_,.�.. __.__ _. _ _.•a. �.•'•sr'..ft••..r.7•'•-xA-,. _. lit .l. 1'_•. +. if the answer to all of the questions In Part 2 are "yes", protected only operation is suggested. Use engineering judgment if a decision to run FYA for the evaluated time period. May 2011 Local Intersection Concepts Page 13-29 138 Mn/DOT Traffic Signal Timing and Coordination Manual Question 6 does Include a threshold volume of 240 vph for the subject left turn. However, if the opposing through volume is low, apply engineering judgment to determirie If Fi'A operation could be used even if the left turn volume exceeds 240 vph. if permissive FYA operation is allowed, protected/permissive operation may be investigated. The decision to use protected/permissive operation should be based on a capacity analysis. Definitions ✓ Protected only left turn operation: signal phasing that allows left turn movements to only be made on an exclusive phase (green arrow). ✓ Conflicting Left Turn Paths: At some locations geometric constraints at the intersection cause the paths of opposing left turn vehicles to cross as overlap creating a conflict. An example is an approach that crosses a divided roadway with a wide median. in these locations, it may be necessary to operate the left turns In a lead -lag sequence or a split phase sequence, not allowing simultaneous opposing left turns. This operation will require protected left turns. ✓ Opposing through lane (conflict): The opposing through lanes are the lanes across from, and in conflict with, the left turning vehicle. Multiple lanes make it difficult for a driver to evaluate gaps in oncoming traffic. An opposing separate right turn lane will typically not be counted with opposing through lanes unless engineering judgment Indicates that the lane configuration and number of right turns will cause conflicts with the left turn movement. ✓ Limited Sight Distance (Requirements): The minimum sight distance values necessary for the design vehicle volume to complete the turn movement. Distance should be calculated from the stop bar for the mainline left turning vehicle. Measurement is based on travel path, speed, and acceleration vehicle height. Both the sight distance for passenger vehicles and trucks should be checked using heights and distance requirements per the AASHTO Geometric Design Guide. The current reference at time this manual was prepared is the 2004 Guide, Chapter 9, Exhibit 9-67). ✓ Dual Left Turn Lanes: Multiple left turn lanes may consist of exclusive left turn lanes or a combination of exclusive left turn lanes and lanes that are shared by through and left turning traffic. Both the dual lane and the left turn lane opposing this operation are suggested to operate with protected phasing. Left turn lanes without opposing traffic, such as left turns off of a one- way street, does not require protected only phasing based upon this criteria. It might also be possible to run the FYA in permissive mode during low volume times of the day. ✓ Protected/pennlssive left turn operation: signal phasing that provides an exclusive phase (green arrow) followed by a permissive phase (flashing yellow arrow), time during the signal cycle where left turning traffic may make a left turn after yielding to oncoming traffic. ✓ Left Turn Related Collisions: These are Collisions that could be corrected by protected only phasing, such as those between those involving a left turning vehicle and an opposing through vehicle. At higher speeds the accidents collisions are likely to be more severe. Therefore, a lower number of collisions might be used as the parameter for consideration for high-speed approaches. Because of the variations In collisions overtime, an average number of collisions per year over a 3- year period should be used if the data Is available. ✓ Speed: Because it can be difficult for a driver to accurately judge available gaps In traffic approaching at high speeds, the engineer must exercise discretion when considering permissive or protected permissive left turn phasing with opposing speeds of 45 MPH or above. Page 3-30 Local Intersection Concepts May 2011 139 o Mn/DOT Traffic Signal Timing and Coordination Manual Use of posted speed limit is recommended. Non -arterial approaches may have lower speeds than the posted speed limit because they are often in a stop condition upon the arrival of traffic. Grades affect the acceleration rate of the left turner and the stopping distance and speed of the opposing through traffic and are therefore considered in conjunction with speeds. ✓ Cross Product: The left turn volume multiplied by the opposing through volume. The cross product values used are taken from the Wisconsin Department of Transportation (WisDOT) Traffic Signal Design Manual discussion on left turn conflicts analysis, Chapter 2, Section 3, Subject 4. Cross product used represents a high frequency of conflicts for left turners looking for gaps In through traffic. FYA during Free Operation With the variable -phasing operation of the FYA head, free operation will no longer have an assigned fixed phasing operation. therefore, standard free operation will need to be set up In the signal controller so technicians can put signals quickly to FREE with a standard phasing operation desired at the specific time. Here is an example of the standard FREE operations that will need to be set up in the signal controller. 1. All left turns protected 2. All left turns protected/permissive 3. All left turns permissive 4. Mainline protected, cross street protected permissive S. Mainline protected, cross street permissive 6. Mainline protected/permissive, cross street protected 7. Mainline protected/permissive, cross street permissive 8. Mainline permissive, cross street protected 9. Mainline permissive, cross street protected/permissive Minimum Green Times Minimum Green Times Mn/DOT currently sets the minimum green time based on the type of phasing operation where protected lefts have a 7 second minimum green and protected/permissive lefts have a 5 second minimum green. Given the FYA head is a variable phasing operation head, a decision will need to be made as to if there should be more than one minimum green value that changes with the phasing operation, or if a universal minimum green should apply to all phasing operations. If one minimum green Is used, and if a left turn phase will ever run protected, the left turn minimum green should be set at 7 seconds. If a left turn will never run protected (i.e. only run protected/permissive or permissive), then the left turn minimum green should be set at 5 seconds. EVP Preemption Operation under FYA A. Protected -only Operation ✓ When the FYA is not allowed (protected only), the pre-emption will bring up the protected left turn and the adjacent through phase. The opposing FYA will not be allowed during preemption (refer to Exhibit 3-15). May 2011 Local Intersection Concepts Page 13-31 140 CRI4 & 20st Ave (1-35E) (Sys ID 38825) FYA Time -of -Day Operation as of 141 Left -Turn FYA Operation Day Plan Event Action Plan Start Time Phase 1 (Westbound) Phases 5 (Eastbound) Phase 3 (Northbound) Phase 7 (Southbound) 1 51 0:00 2 5 6:00%girtP 3 3 6:45 CL 4 5 8:00 5 7 15:15 6 5 18:15 Protetted-PerMissive ProtectOd-Peffnissive Protected -Permissive Protected -Permissive 8 51 19:30-P,(QtgctedI-Pe"P_ive rmissIV6 Proteoccl-Pqrmissiv Prot Pro nL % I 51 0:00 2 5 9:30 trio.. 3 51 18:00 141 Saturday, stay 27, 2017 10:00ANO Morningside Memorial ardens n800 University .Avenue � Coon Rapids, Ninnesota 11:30 A.M. Bunker Nis Park Fofey BCvd & Nath Street (CSA #14) Coon Rapids, Minnesota Presented By: The Veterans organizations of .Anoka County Everyone is invited to attend the family picnic fo(fowing the ceremonies at Bunker 3, M& Park provided by the .Anoka County `Veterans CounciC 142