HomeMy WebLinkAbout2017-06-06 P & Z PacketPLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
teryi& MEETING C!OE$Wff0Wa'5-, Tuesday, June 6, 2017
6:30 p.m.
I. CALL TO ORDER
1. Roll Call
II. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
III. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
IV. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
IF YOU ARE UNABLE TO
MAKE THIS MEETING,
PLEASE LET US KNOW AS
SOON AS POSSIBLE. THANK
YOU!
1. April 4, 2017, Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes
V. PUBLIC HEARING
1. None.
VI. OLD BUSINESS
1. None.
VII. NEW BUSINESS
1. Comprehensive Plan
a. Stantec Proposal
b. WSB Proposal
C. Stantec Water Plan
2. Concept Plan, Mini -Storage, 6965 - 20th Avenue South
3. Request for Parking Relief - Mr. Chad Wagner, 678111eaver Pond Way
4. Reschedule July & August Meetings Due to Independence Day & Night to Unite
VIII. ANNOUNCEMENTS
X. ADJOURNMENT
Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting - July ?, 2017, 6:30 p.m. (Council Chambers)
Parks & Recreation Committee Meeting - June 7, 2017, 6:30 p.m. (Council Chambers)
City Council Meeting - June 14, 2017, 6:30 p.m. (Council Chambers)
City Council Meeting - June 28, 2017, 6:30 p.m. (Council Chambers)
Garage Sale Days - June 9 & 10, 2017
Clean Up Day - June 17, 2017 from 8:00 a.m. - 12:00 (noon)
Fete des Lacs - July 21, 22 & 23, 2017
Parade - July 22, 2017
5K/8K/WaWRun - July 22, 2017
Paddle de Fete - July 23, 2017 (Paddle Board, Canoe & Kayak Race) - No One Left Hungry
Foundation
Music in the Park - June 13, June 20, June 27, July 11, July 18 & July 25, 2017 (Bands TBD)
Night to Unite - August 1, 2017
Movie in the Park — September 16, 2017 — Laurie LaMotte Memorial Park (Movie TBD)
Music in the Park
Dirty Shorts Brass Band — June 6, 2017, Hidden Spring Park (6-8 p.m.)
Cole Thomas — June 13, 2017, Hidden Spring Park (6-8 p.m.)
LaValle Jazz Cats — June 20, 2017, Hidden Spring Park (6-8 p.m.)
Mean Gene & the Woodticks — June 27, 2017, Hidden Spring Park (6-8 p.m.)
Prairie Anthem - July 8, 2017, CenterMart Parking Lot (6-8 p.m.)
Aly Hanzal — July 11, 2017, Hidden Spring Park (6-8 p.m.)
Everchanging Mood — July 18, 2017, Hidden Spring Park (6-8 p.m.)
Soundfall — July 22, 2017, Parking Lot Across from City Hall (10 -Noon)
CITY OF CENTERVILLE
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, the Planning and Zoning Commission held its regular
meeting on Tuesday, April 4, 2017 at 6:30 p.m.
PRESENT: Chairperson Darrin Mosher
Commissioner Linda Broussard Vickers
Commissioner Jon Grahek
Commissioner Kim Ganzel
Commission Pete Johnson T@W@
Commissioner Nick Twohy 0
PP
Commissioner Mark Haden
ABSENT: Council Member Russ Koski
STAFF: Administrative Intern Charles Roberts
OTHERS PRESENT: Kurt Glaser, City Attorney
I. CALL TO ORDER. The meeting was called to order at 6:30 p.m. by Chair Mosher.
1. Roll Call
II. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
III. ROLL CALL
Members were present and accounted for.
IV. PUBLIC HEARING(S)
1. Request for Conditional Use Permit — 7095 — 21" Avenue South (Luther Towing &
Service, Inc.)
Chair Mosher opened the public hearing at 6:31 p.m.
Mr. Craig Kozar, owner of ADL Auto Repair & Drive Shafts, Inc., was present and stated that he
had signed a lease with Mr. Keaton Luther, owner of Luther Towing & Service, Inc., believing
that his operation fit into the zoning of the building.
Mr. Luther was present and stated that he had been operating at the location for two (2) months,
signed a two (2) year lease and desired continued operation at the site. Mr. Luther stated that he
applied for a Conditional Use Permit several months ago.
No members of the audience provided input.
Page 1 of 3
City of Centerville
Planning and Zoning Commission
April 4, 2017
Motion by Chairperson Mosher, seconded by Commissioner Johnson to close the pubic
hearing at 6:50 p.m. All in favor. Motion carried.
IV. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
Motion by Commissioner , seconded by Commissioner to Approve the Agenda
as Presented. All in favor. Motion carried.
V. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
1. February 7, 2017, Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes
Chair Mosher provided Commissioners with an opportunity to make modifications to the
presented minutes if they desired.
Motion by Chair Mosher, seconded by Commission Member Broussard Vickers to Approve
the February 7, 2017 Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes as presented.
Commissioner Haiden abstained. Motion carried.
VI. OLD BUSINESS
1. None.
VII. NEW BUSINESS
1. Request for Conditional Use Permit — 7095 — 21St Avenue South (Luther Towing &
Service, Inc.)
a. Findings of Fact
b. Draft Conditional Use Permit
Lengthy discussion took place regarding the current business practices of Luther Towing, owners
integrity, threatened litigation, hours of operation, amount of vehicles stored indoors/outdoors,
"salvage" operation(s), amount of damage to a vehicle and determination of storage at the
Centerville location versus Maplewood, visual appearance of the site as it can be viewed entering
the City along Main Street, towing vehicles are generally taken home by the drivers,
fencing/screening options, enforcement, and length of time that a vehicle is under Mr. Luther's
care.
Discussion also took place regarding the differences between granting a Conditional Use Permit
versus an Interim Use Permit.
Mr. Kozar was not in favor of fencing any area(s) to allow this operation and Mr. Luther reviewed
and concurred with the proposed Draft Conditional Use Permit.
Motion by Commissioner Broussard Vickers, seconded by Commissioner Haiden to
Recommend to Council Approval of the Findings of Fact and Draft Conditional Use Permit
as presented. All in favor. Motion carried.
Page 2 of 3
City of Centerville
Planning and Zoning Commission
April 4, 2017
2. Review Concept Plan — 7357 — 20th Avenue North (Moore Property)
Mr. Todd Christianson presented the Commission with a Concept Plan for the development of 19
homes on the 20 acre parcel. He stated that he understands that the property is very wet in areas,
he will need wetland mitigation, ditching and has been working with RCWD regarding the
proposed development. He also stated that he is willing to pay park dedication fees, desires to
construct several walkouts and R2A — High Density Single Family homes with smaller lot size
requirements. Mr. Christianson stated that he desired to commence construction this year and
would be appearing before them shortly with a preliminary plat for the development.
3. Review Concept Plan — 7265 Main Street
Mr. Rich DeFoe presented the Commission with a Concept Plan for the development of the parcel
for residential housing. He stated that he desired to construct a cul de sac within the development
and plans were very preliminary at this point.
Consensus of the Commission was that they favored a residential development on this property.
4. Comprehensive Plan
Discussion took place regarding the current Comprehensive Plan, the required update, cost of an
update and the need to consider the future.
The Commission requested that Staff provide research regarding "Dynamic Signage" or the
amount of time that any one message can be lit up.
VIII. ANNOUNCEMENTS
IX. ADJOURNMENT
Motion by Commissioner , seconded by Commissioner to Adiourn the Regularly
Scheduled Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting at p.m. All in favor. Motion
carried.
Respectfully submitted, City Attorney Glaser
Page 3 of 3
6/1/2017
LPH Community Page - LPH Online
COMMUNITY PAGES
CENTERVILLE
STATUS TRACKER
Status trackers identify Council review deadlines, Committee meeting dates, and show the movement of your project
through our process. The time line starts when you submit your plan update or amendment online and appears for the
2040 Comprehensive Plan Update and any in -progress Comprehensive Plan Amendments.
2040 Comprehensive Plan Update
2040 Comp Plan Supp Info Completeness CDC Review Env Committee Met Council 120 Day Deadline
Received Received Review Due N/A Review Review N/A
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
FORECASTS AND COMMUNITY DESIGNATIONS
The Council updates its 30 -year forecasts at least once per
decade. Forecasts indicate when, where and how much
population, household and job growth the region and its
communities can expect. Forecasts are used to help plan
infrastructure needs and weave consistent growth expectations
throughout your plan. These are your recent adopted forecasts.
Forecast Year
I Population
I Households
I Employment
2010
3,792
1,315
409
2020
3,840
1,400
540
2030
3,930
1,450
560
2040
4,060
1,500
590
Centervile Is designated as Emerging Suburban Edge. (L.00k
under Councl PoYcy tab at the bottom for speoft policy for each
deelignialtion.)
ALLOCATION OF AFFORDABLE HOUSING NEED
The Need reflects what share of forecasted regional household
growth will make less than a set threshold of income and therefore
need affordable housing. The Allocation is the determination of each
community's share of this regional need and the first step in helping
to determine the housing goals and objectives in local
comprehensive plans.
The Region's Total Need for Affordable Housing for 2021 - 2030 is
37,900 units. Centerville's 2021 - 2030 Allocation of Need is 14
units.
0
Centerville, Community Designation Map
(Click on the image for larger map)
Sector Rep(s) Corrin Wendell
District 11
Council Members) Sandy Rummel
Affordable Housing Need Allocation
AtOrBelow30AM1 9
From31to50AMl 4
From51to80AMl 1
Total Units 14
AM! = Area Median Income
SEWER ALLOCATION FORECASTS
Your community -wide household, population and employment forecasts have been allocated based on the wastewater
system serving your community. This allocation must be used in projecting future wastewater flows and system capacity
to plan for additional infrastructure needs.
https:/Aphonline.metc.state.mn.us/CommPage?ctu=2393784&applicant--Centerville 1/2
Forecast Year
I Forecast Component
I Population
I Households
I Employment
2010
MCES Sewered
3,358
1,161
403
2010
Unsewered
434
154
6
2020
MCES Sewered
3,410
1,250
530
2020
Unsewered
430
150
10
https:/Aphonline.metc.state.mn.us/CommPage?ctu=2393784&applicant--Centerville 1/2
6/1/2017 LPH Community Page - LPH Online
2030 MCES Sewered 3,520 1,300 550
2030 Unsewered 410 150 10
2040 MCES Sewered 3,640 1,350 580
2040 Unsewered 420 150 10
ONLINE PLAN SUBMITTAL
You can now submit your comprehensive plan update and amendments online! Just complete a quick registration and
login and you can simply upload your plan directly to us. The online submittal works for informal plan review,
supplemental information, the 2040 comprehensive plan update and for plan amendments. Click for more details on how
to use the online submittal tool, requirements for submitting comprehensive plan amendments and comprehensive plan
update submittal requirements. Hard copy or digital (CD) submittals are still accepted.
Maps./Tables Council Policy Planning Process Grants Other Resources
Generalized Land Use Table
Affected Jurisdictions List
Generalized Land Use Acres by School District
Existing Housing Assessment
Link to Community Profiles Page
Download your Community Shapefiles
Maps
Community Designation Map (pdf) Qpg)
Generalized Land Use Map (pdf) Qpg)
Communities and Affected School Districts Map (pdf) Qpg)
Owner Occupied Housing Values Map (pdf) Qpg)
Functional Class Road Map (pdf) Qpg)
Regional Bicycle Transportation Network Map (pdf) Qpg)
Groundwater Level Monitoring Wells Map (pdf) Qpg)
Long-term Service Areas Map (pdf) Qpg)
MCES Sanitary Sewer Meter Service Areas (pdf) Qpg)
Public Water Supply (pdf) Qpg)
Surface Water Ground Water Interaction (pdf) Qpg)
Surface Water Resources (pd") Qpy)
Regional Parks System Map (pdf) Qpg)
(Click on map
/below
� for interactive mapping tool)
Ace Cresk
'egionai ParkMain St'- r,
Cent" '1
eme rvil {e
x
Lino lakes =
https://Iphonline.metc.state.mn.us/CommPage?ctu=2393784&applicant=Centerville 2/2
CHECKLIST OF MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS FOR CENTERVILLE
The checklist below was compiled from information on the Plan Elements pages in the Local Planning Handbook under the
"Minimum Requirements" sections of the respective topics. Please note that this information is subject to change. The most
current information can always be found on the website. Also, please remember that additional information may be requested
during the review process for clarification and accuracy by the Technical Review staff. If you have any questions, please contact
your Sector Representative.
LAND USE
Forecasts and Community Designation
❑ Include a table of forecasted population, households, and employment for 2020, 2030, and 2040, consistent with the
Council's forecasts.
❑ Remember, Council forecasts must be used consistently throughout your entire comprehensive plan.
❑ Your transportation plan needs to allocate forecasts to transportation analysis zones (TAZs).
❑ Your water and wastewater plans need to reflect forecasts to plan for urban services.
❑ Your land use plan must reflect and be coordinated with your forecasts.
❑ Include a map acknowledging your regional Community Designation(s) and acknowledge the overall density expectations
for your Community Designation(s).
❑ Each Community Designation identifies both Council and Community Roles in Thrive's land use policy section. Plans must
be consistent with Community Roles for your Community Designation(s) as well as Community Roles that apply to
everyone.
Existing Land Use
❑ Provide an Existing Land Use Map with a land use legend.
❑ Provide an Existing Land Use Table. Calculate total acres and percent of total acres for each land use category.
❑ Land uses categories on the map and in the table, as well as any text references must all be consistent with one another.
❑ Show existing regional parks, park reserves, and special recreation features with a land use of "Park" (or your equivalent)
on your Existing Land Use Map.
Future Land Use
❑ The Future Land Use plan must be consistent with the Council's forecasts of population, households, and employment and
identify sufficient land to support your community's forecasted growth.
❑ Provide a Future Land Use Map and land use legend, including density ranges for all land uses that allow residential
development.
Provide a Future Land Use Table. Calculate total acres and percent of total acres for each land use category for each 10 -
year planning period (2020, 2030, and 2040).
❑ Define each land use category shown on the Future Land Use Map. Land use categories must be used consistently
throughout your plan.
❑ Land use categories must include types of allowed uses and the minimum and maximum densities ("the allowable density
range") for all categories that allow residential uses. Allowed uses should include a description of allowable housing types
such as single family, detached, duplexes, townhomes, etc.
❑ For each "mixed use" category, define an expected share of individual land uses and identify the permitted density range for
residential uses. For example, Mixed Use Downtown might have an expectation of 30% commercial, 40% office, and 30%
residential with a density of 10-15 units per acre.
❑ Acknowledge Council -approved master plan boundaries of regional parks, park reserves, and special recreation features by
guiding the properties with a land use of "Park" (or your equivalent) on your Future Land Use Map.
For Communities within the Metropolitan Urban Service Area (f: USA) and Rural Centers:
❑ Identify employment locations and provide a measurement of intensity of planned employment. Employment locations
are typically the areas guided for commercial, office, industrial and institutional uses. Acceptable measurements of
intensity include Floor Area Ratio (FAR), building footprint or impervious coverage. Ranges for measuring intensity are
acceptable.
Page - 1 i METROPOLITAN COUNCIL LOCAL PLANNING HANDBOOK
Print Date: 3/15/2016 Checklist of Minimum Requirements for Centerville
For Communities with Special Resources:
❑ See the Special Resources section within the Land Use Plan Element for requirements for Critical Area Plans, Historic
Preservation, and others.
Density Calculations
❑ Identify where forecasted residential growth will happen on your Future Land Use Map. Show expected new development
and re -developed areas.
❑ Identify what density range is expected for each residential land use in your community.
❑ Identify when residential development or redevelopment is anticipated to happen. See the Handbook section on Staged
Development and Redevelopment.
❑ The average net residential density for your community must be consistent with the density requirements for your
community designation.
❑ Provide a minimum and maximum value for each residential density range. (Zero is not an acceptable minimum. The
maximum value must be a whole number.)
❑ Use the lowest allowed residential density from land use ranges in your calculations. For example, a land use that permits a
density range of 3-5 units per acre must use 3 units per acre in all density calculations for this land use. This ensures that
even at the lowest permitted density, the community will be developing at densities that meet overall density expectations.
❑ Focus on areas of change. Show us which planned land uses have changed from your previously approved plan and where
new land uses (change or development intensity) is planned/expected.
❑ Provide the net developable acreage for each residential land use. It's OK to exclude wetlands and natural water bodies,
public parks and open space, arterial road rights-of-way, and natural resource lands protected by local plans and
ordinances (i.e. steep slopes, wetland buffers, tree preservation) from area calculations. Stormwater ponds, utility
easements, local roads, and local rights-of-way cannot be excluded from area calculations.
❑ The information you develop in your land use plan carries over to other elements of your comprehensive plan. The areas
and densities in the land use plan must be consistent across elements related to forecasted growth, wastewater, water,
housing, and transportation.
For Communities with an Affordable Housing Allocation:
❑ Guide residential land at densities sufficient to create opportunities for affordable housing using one of the following
options outlined in the Housing Plan Element. Refer to the Projected Housing Need section.
Staged Development and Redevelopment `'
❑ Identify potential local infrastructure impacts for each 10 -year increment.
❑ Demonstrate that the municipality is capable of providing services and facilities that accommodate its planned growth.
❑ The staging plan or likely development phasing must be consistent with the volume of anticipated sewer flow identified in
your community's Local Sewer Plan.
❑ The staging plan or likely development phasing must support and be consistent with your community's share of the
Region's Need for Affordable Housing for 2021 - 2030.
For Suburban Edge, Emerging Suburban Edge, Rural Centers, and Communities with Orderly Annexation
Agreements (OAAs):
u Map stages of development in 10 -year increments (existing, 2020, 2030, and 2040).
❑ Provide a table of staged development in 10 -year increments. The table must include future land uses, area in acres,
density ranges, and total residential units by each 10 -year time increment.
Natural Resources
❑ Describe your community's goals, intentions, and priorities concerning preservation, conservation, or restoration of natural
resources in your community.
Special Resource Protection
❑ All plans must include a protection element for historic sites.
❑ All plans must include policies for the protection and development of access to direct sunlight for solar energy. Solar access
is addressed in depth under the Resilience section.
❑ All plans must identify whether or not aggregate resources are available within the community. For communities with
aggregate resources, additional requirements apply.
Page - 2 1 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL LOCAL- PLANNING HANDBOOK
Print Date: 3/15/2016 Checklist of Minimum Requirements for Centerville
TRANSPORTATION
Transportation Analysis Zones
❑ Include a table allocating forecasted population, household, and employment growth by TAZ for 2020, 2030 and 2040.
❑ Describe how you have allocated demographic growth based on your plan's assumptions for guided future land use (e.g.,
density, mix of uses, locations for new development, highway/transit access, redevelopment, etc.).
❑ When doing your land use planning, accommodate development densities, around transit consistent with density
expectations established in Chapter 3 of the 2040 Transportation Policy Plan (2040 TPP).
Roadways
❑ Describe and map the functional classification of all existing and proposed roads within your community, using the
functional classification system described in Appendix D of the TPP and the roadway classification map currently
recognized in the region.
❑ Maps must reflect the principal arterials adopted as the metropolitan highway system in the 2040 Transportation Policy
Plan (2040 TPP).
❑ If a community determines that a change to the A -minor arterial system in the community is warranted, a request
should be made to the Transportation Advisory Board (TAB) for the change, and TAB's approval secured, prior to
reflecting the new classification in the community's plan. Check the council's website or contact Elaine Koutsoukos at
651-602-1717 for more information.
❑ Maps should also show the streets classified by the community as major and minor collectors and local streets.
Changes to these streets from the function shown on the regional map are at a community's discretion, and do not
need approval from TAB. However, these changes should follow the criteria laid out in Appendix D of the TPP and
maintain system continuity. A map or table highlighting any discrepancies between the community's map and the
regional functional classification map previously referenced should be submitted to Council staff so the regional map
can be updated.
❑ Include the following information for the principal and A -minor arterials:
u Identify the existing and future number of lanes.
❑ Map current traffic volumes, including heavy commercial volumes, which include both ADT and HCADT.
❑ Map forecasted 2040 traffic volumes. (This should be done using the Council's regional model, or another method with
approval from Council forecasting staff.)
❑ Identify future rights-of-way that need to be preserved.
❑ For other proposed interchange improvements, follow the Highway Interchange Request Criteria and Review
Procedure, which can be found in Appendix F of the 2040 TPP.
G Incorporate access management guidelines of MnDOT, or those of the county in which your community is located, into
your comprehensive plan as well as into your subdivision and zoning ordinances.
❑ Describe recommendations from recent corridor studies regarding roadway improvements, changes in land use,
and/or access.
Transit
❑ The region has established Transit Market Areas to guide the types and levels of transit service that are appropriate for
efficient and effective services. Transit Market Areas are defined in Appendix G of the 2040 TPP by the demographic and
urban design factors that are associated with successful transit service. Identify your community in relationship to your
transit market area(s). Describe and map the existing and planned transit infrastructure and services in your community,
including those of Metro Transit or other regional transit service providers. Communities should include the identification of
the following basic elements of the transit system in their comprehensive plan:
❑ Existing transit routes and dial -a -ride services
❑ Existing and planned park -and -rides and express bus corridors
❑ Existing transit support facilities
Bicycling and Walking
❑ Describe and map the existing and planned on -road and off-road bicycle facilities in your community.
❑ Map and describe the Regional Bicycle Transportation Network (RBTN) within your community:
❑ Show all Tier 1 and Tier 2 RBTN corridors and alignments.
❑ Show the relationship of the RBTN to the local bicycle network of off-road trails and on -street bikeways including all
existing and planned connections.
❑ Include locations of regional employment clusters and activity center nodes (as shown on the RBTN map) and other
local activity centers.
❑ For Tier 1 and Tier 2 corridors on the RBTN, describe and map the existing or planned bicycle facility alignments that
are within the established corridors; the purpose of these corridors is as a placeholder for cities/counties to designate a
planned alignment. If there is a planned alignment that would fulfill the intent of the corridor and that lies within and in
Page - 3 i METROPOLITAN COUNCIL LOCAL PLANNING HANDBOOK
Print Date: 3/15/2016 Checklist of Minimum Requirements for Centerville
line with the corridor's directional orientation that the community would propose to replace the established corridor,
map that alignment and denote by indicating it as "proposed for the RBTN."
❑ Analyze and address the need for local bicycle and pedestrian facility improvements to provide connections that remove
major physical barriers (i.e., freeways, railroad corridors, rivers and streams) on the regional (RBTN) and local networks.
❑ Discuss pedestrian system needs in a manner that responds to your community designation (as described in Thrive MSP
2040) and addresses the needs of your community.
Aviation
❑ Identify policies and ordinances that protect regional airspace from obstructions. Include how your community will notify the
FAA of proposed structures.
❑ Recognize seaplane use on surface waters as designated and regulated by MnDOT; communities should recognize these
areas on plan maps where appropriate and consider issues of land use compatibility.
❑ Map any facilities such as radio beacons or other air navigation aids sited in off -airport locations and address how they will
be protected from physical encroachment and electronic interference through your local ordinance and notification
processes. Your system statement will indicate whether your community hosts one of these facilities.
Freight
❑ Identify railways, barge facilities and truck or intermodal freight terminals within the community.
❑ Identify other important nodes that may generate freight movement, such as industrial parks and large shopping areas.
❑ Map the road network showing volumes of multi -axle trucks (also known as "heavy commercial average annual daily traffic
or HCAADT") for Principal Arterial and A -Minor functional classifications.
❑ Identify any local roadway issues or problem areas for goods movement, such as weight -restricted roads or bridges,
bridges with insufficient height or width clearances, locations with unprotected road crossings of active rail lines, or
intersections with inadequate turning radii.
Page - 4 i METROPOLITAN COUNCIL LOCAL PLANNING HANDBOOK
Print Date: 3/15/2016 Checklist of Minimum Requirements for Centerville
WASTEWATER
Areas Served by the Regional System
❑ A table that details the households and employment forecasts in 10 -year increments through 2040, based on the Council's
forecasts and any subsequent negotiated modifications. This should be broken down by areas served by the Metropolitan
Disposal System, locally owned and operated wastewater treatment systems, and Community and Subsurface sewage
treatment systems. The forecasts used in your wastewater plan must be consistent with the forecasts used throughout your
plan, including in land use, transportation, and water supply.
Li Your wastewater plan must be designed to support these forecasts and provide any allocation breakdowns between
sewered and unsewered service for population, households, and employment.
❑ An electronic map or maps (GIS shape files or equivalent must also be submitted) that show the following information:
Your existing sanitary sewer system identifying lift stations, existing connection points to the metropolitan disposal
system, and future connection points.
❑ Local sewer service districts by connection point.
❑ Intercommunity connections and any proposed changes in government boundaries based on Orderly Annexation
Agreements.
❑ The location of all private and public wastewater treatment plants in your community.
❑ Copy of any intercommunity service agreements entered into with an adjoining community after December 31, 2008;
including a map of areas covered by the agreement.
❑ A table or tables that contain the following information:
❑ Capacity and design flows for existing trunk sewers and lift stations.
❑ Assignment of 2040 growth forecasts by Metropolitan interceptor facility. In the absence of this information the Council
will make its own assignments for the purpose of system capacity needs determination.
❑ Define your community's goals, policies, and strategies for preventing and reducing excessive inflow and infiltration (1/1) in
the local sewer system, including:
Define the requirements and standards for minimizing inflow and infiltration and for the disconnection of sump pump,
foundation drain, and/or rain leader connections to the sanitary sewer system.
❑ Include a copy of or reference to your local ordinance that prohibits the discharge of sump pumps, foundation
drains, and/or rain leaders to the sanitary disposal system.
❑ Include a copy of or reference to your local ordinance requiring the disconnection of existing foundation drains,
sump pumps, and roof leaders from the sanitary sewer system.
❑ Include a summary of activities or programs related to 1/1 source mitigation on private sewer services.
❑ Describe the extent, source, and significance of existing 1/1 problems in your community.
❑ Analyze the costs for remediating the 1/1 issues identified in your community.
❑ An implementation plan that contains a program strategy, priorities, scheduling, and financing mechanisms for eliminating
and preventing excessive 1/1 from entering the sanitary sewer system.
For communities with new trunk sewer systems that require connections to the Metropolitan Disposal System, you
also need to include the following:
❑ A table that details the proposed time schedule for the construction of the new trunk sewer system in your community.
❑ Describe the type and capacity of the treatment facilities, whether municipally or privately owned.
❑ Copies of the associated National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) or State Disposal System (SDS)
permits.
Community and Subsurface Treatment Systems
❑ Describe your community's management program for SSTS to comply with MPCA regulations (Minn. Rules Chapters 7080-
7083).
❑ Map the locations of all existing public and private treatment systems, if any, including package treatment plants and group
on-site systems.
❑ Map the locations of all sub -surface sewage treatment systems. You should also identify the locations of known non-
conforming systems or systems with known problems.
❑ Describe the conditions under which private, community treatment systems (ex. package treatment plants, community
drainfields) would be allowed. Examples of such conditions include:
❑ allowable land uses and residential densities
❑ installation requirements
U management requirements
❑ local government responsibilities
Page - 5 1 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL LOCAL PLANNING HANDBOOK
Print Date: 3/15/2016 Checklist of Minimum Requirements for Centerville
SURFACE WATER
The items in the Minimum Requirements section below are consistent with the requirements under the new Minnesota Rules
Chapter 8410, adopted in July of 2015 and Minn. Stat. 10313.235.
Executive Summary, Water Resource Management Related Agreements, and Amendment Process
❑ Provide an executive summary that includes the highlights of the local water management plan.
❑ Describe the water resource management related agreements that have been entered into by your community. This
includes joint powers agreements related to water management that the community may be a party to between itself and
watershed management organization(s), adjoining communities, or private parties.
❑ Include a section on amendment procedures that defines the process by which amendments may be made. The
amendment procedure must be consistent with the amendment procedures in the watershed organization(s) plans that
affect your community.
Physical Environment and Land Use
❑ Describe the existing physical environment and existing land use. You may be able to incorporate data by reference if
allowed by the appropriate watershed organization(s) plan. You should be aware that not all watershed plans contain the
level of detail needed and in those cases, you will be required to provide this information directly in your local water
management plan.
❑ Describe the proposed physical environment and future land use.
❑ Include a map and/or description of drainage areas that includes path and flow directions of the stormwater runoff in your
community.
❑ Describe the volumes and rates of flow for those defined drainage areas.
Existing and Potential Water Resource -Related Problems
❑ Include an assessment of the existing water resource related problems in your community.
❑ Include an assessment of the potential water resource related problems in your community.
❑ Include a list or map of impaired waters within your community as shown on the most current 303d impaired waters list.
Local Implementation Plan/Program
❑ Include prioritized nonstructural, programmatic, and structural solutions to identified problems.
❑ Describe the areas and elevations for stormwater storage adequate to meet performance standards or official controls in
watershed organization(s) plan.
❑ Define the water quality protection methods that would be adequate to meet performance standards or official controls.
❑ Clearly define the roles and responsibilities of the community from that of the WMO(s) for carrying out implementation
components.
❑ Describe the official controls and any changes needed to official controls.
❑ Include a table briefly describing each component of the implementation program that clearly details the schedule,
estimated cost, and funding sources for each component, including annual budget totals.
❑ Include a table describing the capital improvement program that sets forth by year, details of each contemplated capital
improvement that includes the schedule, estimated cost, and funding source.
Page - 6 1 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL LOCAL PLANNING HANDBOOK
Print Date: 3/15/2016 Checklist of Minimum Requirements for Centerville
WATER SUPPLY
Local Water Supply Plan for Municipal Public Water Suppliers
❑ If the community has a municipal community public water supply system, complete all information in the DNR &
Metropolitan Council water supply plan template. Information must be submitted in the template provided and submitted
through the MnDNR Permit and Reporting System (MPARS).
❑ Include extended water demand projections for 2020, 2030, 2040 and ultimate build -out that are consistent'with population
forecasts in the community's system statement.
Water Conservation & Reuse
❑ If the community has a municipal community public water supply system, complete all information in the DNR &
Metropolitan Council water supply plan template. Information must be submitted in the template provided and submitted
through the MnDNR Permit and Reporting System (MPARS).
Assessing & Protecting Source Water
❑ If the community has a municipal community public water supply system, complete all information in the DNR &
Metropolitan Council water supply plan template. Information must be submitted in the template provided and submitted
through the MnDNR Permit and Reporting System (MPARS).
Sub -Regional Collaboration
❑ If the community has a municipal community public water supply system, complete all information in the DNR &
Metropolitan Council water supply plan template. Information must be submitted in the template provided and submitted
through the MnDNR Permit and Reporting System (MPARS).
Page - 7 1 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL LOCAL PLANNING HANDBOOK
Print Date: 3/15/2016 Checklist of Minimum Requirements for Centerville
PARKS AND TRAILS
Regional Parks and Trails -�--_------------
❑ Describe, map, and label the Regional Parks System facilities that are located in your community.
❑ Depict existing regional parkland with a land use of "Park" (or your community's equivalent) on your Existing Land Use map.
❑ Acknowledge the Council -approved master plan boundaries of regional parks, park reserves, and special recreation
features by guiding the properties with a land use of "Park" (or your community's equivalent) on your Future Land Use map.
Local Parks and Trails
❑ Describe and map your existing and proposed local parks, trails, and recreation facilities.
❑ Include a capital improvement program for parks and open space facilities as part of your implementation program.
Page - 8 i METROPOLITAN COUNCIL LOCAL PLANNING HANDBOOK
Print Date: 3/15/2016 Checklist of Minimum Requirements for Centerville
HOUSING
Existing Housing Needs
❑ Complete an existing housing assessment, including:
❑ A table of existing local conditions, including the following information:
❑ 1. Total number of housing units.
❑ 2. Number of housing units affordable to households with incomes at or below 30% Area Median Income (AMI),
between 31 and 50% AMI, and between 51 and 80% AMI.
❑ 3. Number of housing units that are owner occupied.
❑ 4. Number of housing units that are rental.
❑ 5. Number of single family homes.
❑ 6. Number of multi -family homes.
❑ 7. Number of publicly subsidized housing units by the following types: senior housing, housing for people with
disabilities, and all other publicly subsidized units. Include expiration dates of affordability requirements when
applicable.
0 Number of existing households that are experiencing housing cost burden with incomes at or below 30% Area Median
Income (AMI), between 31 -50% AMI, and 51 -80% AMI. A map of owner -occupied housing units identifying their assessed
values. At a minimum, differentiate the values above and below $211,500.
❑ A narrative analysis of existing housing needs. At a minimum address the components of the existing housing assessment
within the local context of your community. Plans consistent with Council policy will clearly identify existing housing needs
and priorities for the community.
Projected Housing Need
❑ Discuss how the land use plan addresses the future housing need for your forecasted growth.
For Those Communities With An Affordable Housing Need Allocation:
❑ Acknowledge your community's allocation of the region's need for affordable housing at three levels of affordability:
<30% AMI, 31-50% AMI, and 51-80% AMI.
❑ Guide residential land at densities sufficient to create opportunities for affordable housing using one of the following
options:
4 Option 1: Guide sufficient land at minimum residential densities of 8 units/acre to support your community's total
allocation of affordable housing need for 2021 — 2030. This option may be best for communities that find it difficult
to support densities of 12 units/acre (per Option 2), or prefer simplicity over flexibility in their density minimums.
❑ Option 2: Guide sufficient land at minimum residential densities of:
n 12 units/acre to address your community's allocation of affordable housing need at <50% AMI. This
combines your community's allocation at <30% AMI and 31-50% AMI.
❑ 6 units/acre to address your community's allocation of affordable housing need at 51-80% AMI.
❑ Option 2 may be best for communities that feel they can achieve affordable housing needs at 51-80% AMI with
less than 8 units/acre. It also allows the affordable housing need to be addressed with less actual land, as is the
case if communities choose to use even higher densities than are required. Furthermore, communities using
Option 2 may guide land to meet their allocation of affordable housing need at 51-80% AMI using a minimum
density range of 3-6 units/acre if they have demonstrated in the last 10 years the application of programs,
ordinances, and/or local fiscal devices that led to the development of housing affordable at 51-80% AMI in their
community. Examples include: density bonuses for affordable housing unit inclusion, local funding programs such
as TIF, etc.
Implementation Plan
❑ A description of public programs, fiscal devices, and other specific actions that could be used to meet the existing and
projected housing needs identified in the housing element. Include in what circumstances and in what sequence they would
be used.
❑ Plans consistent with Council policy will clearly and directly link identified needs to available tools. Needs are identified
within the three levels of affordability, and tools should therefore be addressed within the levels of affordability as well.
J Plans consistent with Council policy will consider all widely accepted tools to address their housing needs. A list of widely
accepted tools is provided, however, this list is not exhaustive. Communities are strongly encouraged to include any
additional tools at their disposal when identifying how they will address their housing needs.
Page - 9 1 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL LOCAL PLANNING HANDBOOK
Print Date: 3/15/2016 Checklist of Minimum Requirements for Centerville
RESILIENCE
Energy Infrastructure and Resources
❑ Local governments in the seven -county metropolitan area are required by state law to include an element in their Plan for
protection and development of access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems.
Page -10 1 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL LOCAL PLANNING HANDBOOK
Print Date: 3/15/2016 Checklist of Minimum Requirements for Centerville
ECONOMIC COMPETITIVENESS
Redevelopment
Q Minnesota Statutes § 473.859 Subd. 1 states that local comprehensive plans "shall contain objectives, policies, standards,
and programs to guide... redevelopment and preservation for all lands and waters within the jurisdiction of the local
governmental unit'. The information provided in this section of the handbook is intended to assist communities as they
grapple with the opportunities and challenges associated with development sites that are declining in value, viability, and
marketability.
Page - 11 1 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL LOCAL PLANNING HANDBOOK
Print Date: 3/15/2016 Checklist of Minimum Requirements for Centerville
IMPLEMENTATION
Implementation
❑ Describe all public programs, fiscal devices, and other actions that your community will use to implement your plan.
❑ Define a timeline as to when actions will be taken to implement each required element of your comprehensive plan.
❑ Include a Capital Improvement Program (CIP) for transportation, sewers, parks, water supply, and open space facilities.
Specify the timing and sequence of major local public investments.
❑ The CIP must align with development staging identified in other parts of your plan and include budgets and expenditure
schedules.
❑ Describe all relevant official controls addressing at least zoning, subdivision, water supply, and private sewer systems.
❑ Include a schedule for the preparation, adoption, and administration of needed changes to official controls.
❑ Include your local zoning map and zoning category descriptions. Identify what changes are needed to ensure zoning is not
in conflict with your new land use plan and consistent with regional system plans and policies.
❑ Review and update official controls within 9 months of adopting your 2040 plan. Official controls must not be in conflict with
your updated plan. You must provide copies of all revised official controls to us.
❑ The Housing Plan Element has implementation requirements as well. Refer to that section to ensure that implementation
requirements for the Housing Action Plan are met.
Page - 12 1 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL LOCAL PLANNING HANDBOOK
Print Date: 3/15/2016 Checklist of Minimum Requirements for Centerville
Land Use Policies
W
J
0
z
D
0
0
l.:.!
J
0
J_
U
z
0
U
Orderly and Efficient Land Use
Align land use, development patterns, and infrastructure to make the best use of public and private investment.
• Plan and stage development for forecasted growth
through 2040 and beyond at overall average net
densities of at least 3-5 dwelling units per acre in the
community. Target higher -intensity developments
in areas with better access to regional sewer and
transportation infrastructure, connections to local
commercial activity centers, transit facilities, and
recreational amenities.
• Identify and protect an adequate supply of land
to support growth for future development beyond
2040, with regard to agricultural viability and natural
and historic resources preservation.
• Incorporate best management practices for
stormwater management and natural resources
conservation and restoration in planning processes.
• Plan for local infrastructure needs including those
needed to support future growth.
• Promote land use patterns with clear distinctions
between urban and rural areas to protect natural
resources and land for agricultural viability.
• Provide technical assistance to communities on land
use strategies and staged development to inform
the local comprehensive planning process.
• Partner with local communities to improve land use
patterns to reduce generation of carbon emissions.
ALL COMMUNITIES
• Plan for development to support forecasted
growth at appropriate densities as articulated
in the following land use policies by community
designation.
• Plan and develop interconnected and well-
connected local streets, adequate stormwater
infrastructure, adequate water supply, and properly
managed subsurface sewage treatment systems to
support local growth forecasts.
• Develop plans to improve conditions for and
encourage walking and bicycling where appropriate.
• Maintain, replace, or expand local facilities and
infrastructure to meet growth and development
needs.
• Adopt and implement the local comprehensive plan
following Council review.
OVERALL DENSITY EXPECTATIONS
DEVELOPMENT. AND REDEVELOPMENT
Metropolitan urban Service Area:
Urban
FOR NEW GROWTH.
Minimum Average Net Density
..
10 units/acre
Suburban .. -
3-5 units/acre
:.. .. ..3-5
uniWacre
• Advance the Council mission of ensuring orderly
and economical development.
• Develop and update regional plans to manage
forecasted growth by using regional systems and
land efficiently and effectively.
• Coordinate major regional investment projects with
local infrastructure and planning for development
and redevelopment.
• Promote development patterns that protect natural
resources, the quality and quantity of our water
resources, and our water supply.
• Promote land use patterns that differentiate between
urban and rural uses.
• Promote interconnected, compact development
patterns.
• Coordinate wastewater conveyance projects with
Regional Parks System improvements where
appropriate.
1
Land Use Policies
W
J
0
cc
Z
c�
cG
G
0
0
W
J
0
J
U
Z
Z)
0
U
Natural Resources Protection
Conserve, restore, and protect the region's natural resources to ensure their ongoing availability, to support
public health, and to maintain a high quality of life.
• Complete local natural resources inventories,
prioritize areas to protect, and integrate natural
resources conservation into local ordinances.
• Conserve natural resources and protect vital natural
areas when designing and constructing local
infrastructure and planning land use patterns.
• Encourage site planning that incorporates
natural areas as part of site development
and redevelopment.
• Please refer to the policies that apply to all
communities
ALL COMMUNITIES
• Include goals, priorities, and natural resource
conservation strategies in the local comprehensive
plan to protect and enhance natural resources
identified in regional and local natural resource
inventories.
• Conserve, protect, and interconnect open space
to enhance livability, recreational opportunities and
habitats.
• Adopt and implement ordinances for the
conservation and restoration of natural resources
within the community.
• Work with regional partners and regional park
implementing agencies to identify, plan for, and
acquire natural areas and resources prime for
preservation and protection.
• Plan for aggregate resource extraction where viable
deposits remain accessible, as required by the
Metropolitan Land Planning Act.
• integrate natural resource protection strategies
into metropolitan system plans for infrastructure
investments.
• Collaborate with local, regional, and state
partners to expand the Regional Parks System, as
appropriate, to conserve, maintain, and connect
natural resources identified as of high quality or
of regional importance, consistent with the 2040
Regional Parks Policy Plan.
• Collaborate and convene with state, regional, and
local partners to protect, maintain, and enhance
natural resources protection.
• Maintain an up-to-date regional Natural Resources
Inventory and Assessment in partnership with the
Department of Natural Resources.
• Provide technical assistance and tools for natural
resources protection, conservation, and restoration.
• Promote the implementation of best management
practices for habitat restoration and natural resource
conservation.
4
Land Use Policies
W
J
O
cc
Z
c�
C
O
U
Water Sustainability
Conserve, restore, and protect the quality and quantity of the region's water resources to ensure ongoing
availability, support public health, and maintain a high quality of life.
• Incorporate best management practices
for stormwater management in planning
processes and implement best
management practices with development
and redevelopment to control and treat
stormwater.
• Integrate water sustainability and protection
of groundwater recharge areas into local
plans. Consider how development, irrigation,
reductions in infiltration and inflow, and
increased surface runoff impact groundwater
recharge and consider conservation
strategies and best management practices
to mitigate these impacts.
• Adopt and implement best management
practices for protection of natural resources,
the quality and quantity of our water \
resources, and the preservation of water
supply.
• Explore alternative water supply sources to
ensure adequate water resources beyond
2040.
ALL COMMUNITIES
• Collaborate and convene with state, regional, and local
partners to protect, maintain, and enhance natural
resources protection and the protection of the quality and
quantity of the region's water resources and water supply.
• Prepare and implement local water supply plans and
source water (wellhead) protection ordinances, consistent
with Minnesota Rules part 4720, in all communities with
municipal water supply.
• Plan land use patterns that facilitate groundwater recharge
and reuse, and reduce per capita water use to protect the
region's water supply.
• Plan for sustainable water supply options and groundwater
recharge areas to promote development in accordance
with natural resources protection and efficient use of land.
• Partner with other water supply providers to explore
options to reduce dependence on groundwater.
• Prepare and implement local surface water plans
as required by Minnesota Rules Chapter 8410, the
Metropolitan Land Planning Act, and the 2040 Water
Resources Policy Plan.
• Reduce the excess flow of clear water into the local
wastewater collection system (inflow and infiltration).
Participate in inflow / infiltration grant programs as
available.
• Incorporate current MPCA regulations (Minn. Rules
Chapters 7080-7083) as part of a program for managing
subsurface sewage treatment systems (SSTS) in the
comprehensive plan and local ordinances, and implement
the standards in issuing permits. Describe the conditions
under which the installation of SSTS will be permitted and
the areas not suitable for public or private systems.
• Adopt and enforce ordinances related to stormwater
management and erosion control.
• Adopt and implement best management practices for
abating, preventing, and reducing point and nonpoint
source pollution.
• Develop and adopt critical area plans and ordinances
consistent with Executive Order 79-19 and Critical Area
Program rules in all communities with affected lands in the
Mississippi River Critical Area Corridor.
• Integrate drinking water source protection into local
land use decisions, particularly in Drinking Water Supply
Management Areas.
• Develop programs that encourage stormwater
management, treatment, and infiltration.
3
Land Use Policies
W
J
0
J_
U
Z
D
0
0
Water Sustainability
Conserve, restore, and protect the quality and quantity of the region's water resources to ensure ongoing
availability, support public health, and maintain a high quality of life.
ALL COMMUNITIES
• Collaborate and convene with state, regional, and local partners
to protect, maintain, and enhance natural resources protection
and the protection of the quality and quantity of the region's
water resources and water supply.
• Work to maintain and improve the quality and availability of the
region's water resources to support habitat and ecosystem health
while providing for recreational opportunities, all of which are
critical elements of our region's quality of life.
• Update regional plans for water supply and pursue
environmentally sound and cooperative water reuse practices,
conservation initiatives, joint planning, and implementation efforts
to maximize surface water infiltration to recharge groundwater
supplies.
• Support economic growth and development by promoting the
wise use of water through a sustainable balance of surface and
groundwater use, conservation, reuse, aquifer recharge and other
practices.
• Provide efficient and high-quality regional wastewater
infrastructure and services.
• Pursue wastewater reuse where economically feasible as a
means to promote sustainable water resources.
• Reduce the excess flow of clear water into the regional
wastewater collection system (inflow and infiltration) to protect
capacity for future growth.
• Require proper management of subsurface treatment systems,
consistent with Minn. Rules Chapters 7080-7083, to minimize
impacts on surface water, groundwater, and public health.
• Assure adequate and high quality groundwater and surface water
supplies to protect public health and support economic growth
and development by promoting the wise use of water through
a sustainable balance of surface water and groundwater use,
conservation, reuse, aquifer recharge, and other practices.
• Review watershed management plans in coordination with the
Board of Water and Soil Resources.
• Review local water plans in partnership with the watershed
organizations that approve the local water plans.
• Support implementation of volume reduction techniques such as
infiltration or filtration for stormwater management.
• Promote the implementation of best management practices for
stormwater management.
• Collaborate with the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources
(DNR) to provide technical assistance to local governments in
implementing the Mississippi River Critical Area Program, and
coordinate with the DNR in review of those plans and ordinances.
4
Land Use Policies
W
J
0
Z
cD
G
O
U
Housing Affordability and Choice
Promote housing options to give people in all life stages and of all economic means viable choices for safe,
stable, and affordable homes.
• Designate land in the comprehensive plan
to support household growth forecasts and
address the community's share of the region's
affordable housing need through development and
redevelopment at a range of densities.
• Use state, regional, and federal sources of funding
and/or financing and development tools allowed
by state law to facilitate the development of new
lifecycle and affordable housing.
• Plan for affordable housing that meets the needs of
multigenerational households.
• Plan for future staged growth through 2040 and
beyond to accommodate a variety of housing
choices based on local needs.
ALL COMMUNITIES
• Prepare a local comprehensive plan that addresses
the affordable housing planning requirements of the
Metropolitan Land Planning Act, including guiding
sufficient land to support a community's share
of the regional affordable housing need and an
implementation section that identifies the programs,
fiscal devices, and official controls to be employed to
address a community's share of the regional need for
affordable housing.
• Review local ordinances, policies, and partnerships
to ensure they encourage and facilitate the
opportunity for the development or preservation of
affordable and lifecycle housing.
• Identify and analyze local markets, location,
condition, and availability of affordable units, both
publicly subsidized and naturally occurring, to inform
the housing element of the local comprehensive
plan.
• Participate in Livable Communities Act programs by
negotiating affordable and lifecycle housing goals
that support regional and local housing needs, and
prepare a Housing Action Plan to address those
goals and become eligible to access grant funding
to address local development and redevelopment
objectives.
• Direct new affordable housing development to land
with sewer service or adequate community septic
systems.
• Collaborate with partners, especially counties, to
rehabilitate and preserve existing housing, including
in rural areas.
5
Land Use Policies
W
J
0
J_
U
Z
0
U
Housing Affordability and Choice
Promote housing options to give people in all life stages and of all economic means viable choices for safe,
stable, and affordable homes.
ALL COMMUNITIES
• Provide guidance to communities regarding their
share of the regional affordable housing need in
order to implement the Metropolitan Land Planning
Act.
• Provide technical assistance to communities
to establish, encourage, expand, and preserve
affordable housing options and expand local
knowledge of and access to funding assistance for
housing, whether public, private, or philanthropic.
• Negotiate lifecycle and affordable housing goals
with communities that participate in the Livable
Communities Act.
• Strategically invest Council resources to assist
community efforts to increase the variety of housing
types and costs, attract and retain residents,
create and preserve mixed -income neighborhoods,
appropriately mix land uses, increase transportation
choices, and leverage private investment.
• Encourage the use of sustainable building
techniques in housing to promote livability and
health, increase energy efficiency, create longer
lasting and more durable housing, and benefit the
regional environment.
• Promote the preservation of existing housing,
especially affordable housing, to maintain the most
affordable housing stock.
• Calculate housing performance scores that reflect
each community's existing affordable housing stock
and new affordabie housing opportunities created.
• Collaborate with partners to expand the supply of
affordable housing available at all income levels,
including extremely low-income households who
earn less than 30% of the area median income (that
is, $24,850 for a family of four in 2014).
• Support research and other activities related to
fair housing, residential lending, and real estate
practices to determine if discriminatory practices are
occurring and limiting housing choices.
• Convene regional and local housing stakeholders,
including practitioners, funders, and advocates, to
refine policies and develop programs to respond to
the housing needs of low- and moderate -income
households throughout the region.
R
Land Use Policies
W
-J
0
cc
Z
c�
G
0
0
Access, Mobility, and Transportation Choice
Sustain and improve a multi modal transportation system to support regional growth, maintain regional economic
competitiveness, and provide choices and reliability for the system's users.
• Develop local policies, plans, and practices
that improve pedestrian and bicycle circulation,
including access to regional transit services,
regional trails with improved pedestrian
connections, and regional bicycle corridors.
• Target opportunities for intensive development
in nodes along corridors with strong potential for
future transit investment, consistent with the 2040
Transportation Policy Plan, to create the transit -
supportive land use patterns necessary for efficient
future transit service and investment.
• Work with partners in communities and counties
to overcome barriers to transportation and to
improve pedestrian and bicycle connections across
jurisdictional boundaries.competitiveness.
ALL COMMUNITIES
• Consider travel modes other than the car at all
levels of development (site plan, subdivision,
comprehensive planning) to better connect and
integrate choices throughout all stages of planning.
• Plan for and construct an interconnected system of
local streets, pedestrian, and bicycle facilities that
is integrated with the regional system to minimize
short trips on the regional highway system.
• Adopt access management standards that support
state and county highway access and mobility
needs.
• Plan for compatible land uses and air space
adjacent to the system of regional airports.
• Participate in regional transportation planning
activities to ensure that the metropolitan planning
process and regional transportation system reflect
local needs.
• Work with partners in communities, counties, and
the region at large to coordinate transportation,
pedestrian, bicycle, and trail connections within and
between jurisdictional boundaries.
7
Land Use Policies
Access, Mobility, and Transportation Choice
Sustain and improve a multi modal transportation system to support regional growth, maintain regional economic
competitiveness, and provide choices and reliability for the system's users.
11
ilk
ALL COMMUNITIES
uJ Invest in strategic transit and transportation • Oversee the planning of a multimodal, interconnected
J improvements that support more reliable regional transportation system in cooperation with state
0 access to and from Emerging Suburban agencies, counties, local governments, and suburban
Edge communities. transit providers.
J
U
Z
0
U
• Plan park-and-ride capacity in parts of the
Invest in and operate transit services commensurate with
region where there is significant demand for
efficient and effective standards established by Transit
access to regional destinations, but where it
Market Areas defined in the 2040 Transportation Policy
is currently not cost-effective to provide local
Plan. Coordinate other regional transit services to ensure a
bus connections.
consistent and convenient user experience.
• Plan transit facilities to better incorporate
alternative mode connections, such as trails
and sidewalks, for facilities serving locations
where commuters have to travel greater
distances to complete their trip.
• Encourage communities to develop at
densities and in ways that could eventually
support local transit service, including
walking and bicycling connections to transit.
• Invest in the development and improvement
of regional trails and regional bicycle
corridors to better connect communities
and provide viable transportation options for
commuting via alternative modes.
• Work with state agencies, counties, and
local governments to provide assistance in
planning for freight transportation to connect
the rural and urban areas' markets and
resources.
• Support investments to safely operate, preserve and
improve the regional highway system, which includes
principal and A -minor arterials, by providing transit
advantages, MnPASS lanes, and implementing cost-
effective, management, spot mobility, and strategic
capacity improvements.
• Support the management of access points to state and
county road systems and emphasize construction of an
interconnected local public street system.
• Support the development of regional bicycle corridors as
defined in the 2040 Transportation Policy Plan to provide
viable transportation options.
• Invest in the development and improvement of regional
trails as defined in the 2040 Regional Parks Policy Plan
to better connect communities with regional parks and to
provide recreational opportunities. Encourage communities
to plan and develop local trail connections to the Regional
Parks System where appropriate.
• Work with local, regional, and state partners to coordinate
transportation, pedestrian, bicycle, and trail connections
across jurisdictional boundaries.
• Use Council investments and policies to reduce vehicle
miles traveled (VMT) and carbon per unit of fuel, which are
key drivers of the region's generation of greenhouse gas
emissions.
• Ensure that transportation elements of local
comprehensive plans provide for pedestrian and bicycle
access to regional transit services, regional trails, and
regional bicycle corridors.
• Invest in transportation improvements that support the
export and mobility of freight by truck, rail, air, and barge.
• Coordinate with the Metropolitan Airports Commission,
the Federal Aviation Administration, Minnesota Department
of Transportation Office of Aeronautics, and local
communities to ensure that land uses and air space
adjacent to the system of regional airports is protected
from incompatible uses.
E1*3
Land Use Policies
W
J
0
Z
cD
cG
G
0
0
W
J
0
J
U
Z
D
0
U
Economic Competitiveness
Foster connected land use options to provide businesses and industries with access to materials,
markets, and talent.
• Consider how local efforts to focus economic
development strategies along existing commercial
centers (historic downtowns or commercial
corridors) can contribute to the region's overall
economic competitiveness through enhanced
integration of local and regional planning efforts.
• Protect sites for highway-, river- and rail -dependent
manufacturing and freight transportation needs from
incompatible uses and identify local land supply and
transportation needs for effective use of those sites.
• Identify important multimodal intersections,
alternative freight routes, key intersections, and
other existing opportunities that may contribute to
local and regional economic competitiveness.
• Invest in regional amenities and services, including
transit, regional parks and trails, and bikeways to
support the Emerging Suburban Edge area as an
attractive place to locate and do business.
• Promote local planning around key intersections,
regional infrastructure, and business needs.
• Support the development of workforce housing to
provide nearby housing options for employees of
local employers.
• Convene interested partners to further strategies
towards increasing regional competitiveness and
include discussion of how Emerging Suburban Edge
communities can contribute to the region's overall
economic growth.
ALL COMMUNITIES
• Plan for the further development of and
intensification of existing and emerging
Job Concentrations.
• Consider completing a community-based market
analysis to better understand real estate needs for
commercial and industrial land.
• Consider addressing economic competitiveness in
the local comprehensive plan.
• Preserve sites for highway-, river-, and rail -
dependent manufacturing and freight transportation.
• Engage with businesses and other employers
to ensure their input is provided to the local
comprehensive plan.
• Prioritize regional investments that improve access
to national and international markets by regional and
state businesses.
• Ensure that regional growth is managed in efficient
ways that allow for a variety of choices in location
and transportation for businesses and residents.
• Support a variety of freight transport to better
connect the region with state, national, and
international markets.
• Support the cleanup of contaminated land for new
industry, including manufacturing and other sectors
kx that are export industries for the region.
• Promote the intensification of existing and emerging
Job Concentrations.
• Provide technical assistance to help local commu-
nities better understand their contributions to the
regional economy; provide information, research,
and analysis on economic competitiveness.
• Support cost-effective subregional infrastructure
investments in efforts to promote sustainable water
use and protect the region's water supplies.
• Support local and regional efforts to develop climate
change mitigation and adaptation strategies to
remain economically competitive.
9
Land Use Policies
W
J
0
r�
z
cD
CG
G
0
U
Building in Resilience
Promote sensitive land use and development patterns to contribute toward achieving Minnesota's
adopted greenhouse gas emission goals at the regional scale, and to develop local resiliency to the
impacts of climate change.
• Identify local measures that would result in
reductions in water use, energy consumption, and
greenhouse gas emissions.
• Identify local mitigation and adaptation strategies
and infrastructure resiliency plans to protect against
potential negative impacts to local economies, local
resources, and infrastructure systems that result
from more frequent or severe weather events.
• Implement compact development patterns and
create more connected places to reduce auto -
dependency and related generation of greenhouse
gas emissions.
ALL COMMUNITIES
• Address climate change mitigation and adaptation in
locally meaningful ways in the local comprehensive
plan.
• Identify local measures that would result in
reductions in water use, energy consumption, and
emission of greenhouse gases.
• Ensure that local comprehensive plans and
ordinances protect and enable the development
of solar resources, as required by the Metropolitan
Land Planning Act, and consider the use of other
alternative energy sources as part of the planning
process.
• Consider the development or use of community
solar gardens (CSGs) by public and private
entities to enable fuller and more economic use
of the community's solar resource, including
participating as subscribers, assisting in marketing
community solar garden opportunities for economic
development, and providing sites for gardens to be
developed.
• Identify local measures to address impacts to local
economies, local resources, and infrastructure
systems as a result of more frequent or severe
weather events.
• Identify local initiatives as cost-saving measures
that may, as a result, lower energy consumption,
reduce the generation of greenhouse gas emissions,
preserve water supply, reduce municipal waste, or
increase participation in recycling programs.
• Participate in programs that evaluate and share
city practices and provide technical support, such
as the GreenStep Cities program and the Regional
Indicators Initiative.
10
Land Use Policies
Building in Resilience
Promote sensitive land use and development patterns to contribute toward achieving Minnesota's
adopted greenhouse gas emission goals at the regional scale, and to develop local resiliency to the
impacts of climate change.
ALL COMMUNITIES
• Substantially reduce energy consumption at Council facilities,
improve the efficiency of the Council's vehicle fleets including
Metro Transit buses, and provide information to the public and
partners to lead by example.
• With regional infrastructure, planning, and operations, increase
efforts to reduce water use and energy consumption.
• Identify and address potential vulnerabilities in regional
systems as a reswlt of increased frequency and severity
of storms and heat waves. Maintain dikes, emergency
generators, and response plans for Council facilities facing
extreme weather.
• Use the Council's investments and planning authorities to
contribute toward meeting statutory goals for reductions in the
generation of regional greenhouse gas emissions.
• Convene regional discussions about goals for climate change
mitigation and adaptation.
• Encourage the preparation of adaptation, mitigation, and
resiliency responses to climate change as part of the
comprehensive plan update.
• Develop, collect, and disseminate information about climate
change, including energy and climate data, GreenStep Cities
best practices, and the next generation of the Regional
Indicators data.
• Work with the State of Minnesota on a greenhouse gas
emissions inventory that informs regional discussion on
emissions reduction.
• Provide technical assistance and toolkit resources to
communities in integrating climate change mitigation and
adaptation strategies as part of local comprehensive plans.
• Develop and strengthen partnerships with experts in climate
change to better assist and inform local communities on how
best to evaluate and develop local climate changes strategies.
• Encourage communities to participate in regional programs
which support efforts to inform, plan for, mitigate, adapt, and
respond to climate change issues of local significance such
as water conservation, stormwater infrastructure adaptation,
greenhouse gas reduction, use of alternative energy sources,
infrastructure planning, and hazard mitigation planning.
• Provide technical references and resources for communities
seeking to mitigate and adapt to climate change in their
own facilities and in their communities. Examples of these
resources include stormwater, wastewater, and water supply
management practices, and transit and land use planning.
11
Mike Ericson
From: Shardlow, John <John.Shardlow@stantec.com>
Sent: Monday, April 03, 2017 3:58 PM
To: Mike Ericson
Cc: Statz, Mark; Carlson, Phil
Subject: Fay Simer
Hi Mike,
Fay Simer has accepted a job at the City of St. Paul. I will increase my oversight and work with Katrina Nygaard.
This will not change our proposed fee.
Katrina has just assisted me with the Cambridge Comprehensive Plan. She is very smart and an excellent writer
and presenter. You have my complete assurance that Centerville will be well served and get the
Comprehensive Plan that you need now.
John
John Shardlow, FAICP
Senior Principal
Stantec
2335 Highway 36 West, St. Paul MN 55113-3819
Phone: (651) 967-4560
Cell: (612) 720-3674
Fax: (651) 636-1311
John.Shardlow@stantec.com
0
The content of this email is the confidential property of Stantec and should not be copied, modified, retransmitted, or used for any purpose except with
Stantec's written authorization. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete all copies and notify us immediately.
Please consider the environment before printing this email.
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please visit http://www.syrnanteccloud.com
Stantec
March 20, 2017
Stantec Consulting Services Inc.
2335 Highway 36 West„ St. Paul MN 55113-3819
Attention: Mike Ericson, City Administrator
1880 Main Street
Centerville, MN
55038
Dear Mike and Centerville City Council,
Reference: Centerville Comprehensive Plan
Thank you for the opportunity to submit our proposal to assist Centerville with an update to your
Comprehensive Plan. It has been our privilege to assist well over 100 communities with the
preparation and implementation of their comprehensive plans. This has been a core part of our
professional practice for nearly four decades and we have a deep appreciation for the
importance of these plans in setting the foundation for a community's future growth and land use
decisions. We are passionate about the work it takes to formulate an insightful and strategic
comprehensive plan.
Stantec is proud if its history serving Centerville and we are committed to performing this update in
a timely and efficient manner. We understand that the City has received a grant from the
Metropolitan Council for mapping assistance and we will incorporate those information sources
into our process. Wherever possible, we will use existing resources and mapping tools already
available. We will work closely with City staff and the Planning Intern when possible to conduct
research and information gathering. We will ensure that staff has up-to-date information on the
plan's progress that can be shared with the City Council at regular intervals and with the general
public.
Attached to this letter are a quote for our services, estimated timeline, and resumes of each team
member who will be working on the plan. Below is an overview of tasks noted in our scope.
Scope of Services
1. Kickoff and Goals
This phase sets the foundation for our efforts on this plan. We will attend one kick-off
meeting with staff, facilitate a plan orientation/issues discussion workshop with the Planning
Commission and City Council, and present draft goals to the City Council during this phase
of the plan.
2. Land Use
We will update the City's land use chapter. As part of this task, we will interview owners of
large vacant or agricultural properties to inform potential future land use in the City. This will
include an updated future land use map, redevelopment areas, employment locations,
Design with community in mind
C�'
March 20, 2017
Mike Ericson, City Administrator
Page 2 of 3
Reference: Centerville Comprehensive Plan
and redevelopment staging. We will assess the City's existing and proposed land use for
conformity with updated goals identified through this planning process.
3. Transportation
We will update the City's transportation chapter, including all mapping items required by
the Metropolitan Council. We will assess the City's existing and proposed transportation
system for conformity with updated goals identified through this planning process.
4. Water
We will incorporate findings from the City's updated Wastewater and Sewer Plan, Surface
Water Management Plan, and Water Supply Plan to ensure all items required by the
Metropolitan Council are integrated into the comprehensive plan.
5. Parks
We will describe and identify local and regional parks and natural resources in Centerville.
We will assess the City's existing and proposed park system for conformity with updated
goals identified through this planning process.
6. Housing
We will conduct a housing inventory, identifying total number of units, total affordable
units, housing tenure, housing type and number of publicly subsidized homes in Centerville.
We will assess the City's housing needs based on current and future demographics and
acknowledge the allocation of affordable units throughout the City. We will identify
housing needs in the context of updated goals identified through this planning process.
7. Implementation Plan
We will prepare implementation steps and strategies for the key features of the
comprehensive plan, including a capital improvement program for transportation, sewers,
parks, water supply, and open space facilities that specifies the timing and sequence of
major public investments.
8. Plan Adoption
We will host a public hearing to share the draft plan with the public. We will present the
draft plan to the Planning Commission and City Council for the Council's recommendation
Design with community in mind
March 20, 2017
Mike Ericson, City Administrator
Page 3 of 3
Reference: Centerville Comprehensive Plan
to submit the plan for administrative review. We will manage the administrative review
process with the Metropolitan Council and affected jurisdictions. We will make any
necessary revisions to the draft plan and finalize the plan.
Please note: hourly rates presented in the attached scope are for 2017 and are subject to change
in 2018. While Stantec commits not to exceed the total contract amount noted in our scope, we
reserve the right to adjust hourly rates in accordance with our 2018 rate schedule.
Thank you for the opportunity to work with on this important project!
Regards,
STANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES INC.
C;� 01'7n�
Fay Simer, AICP
Senior Planner
Phone: (651) 967-4552
Fay.Simer@stantec.com
John Shardlow, FACIP
Principal -in -Charge
Phone: (651) 967-4560
john.shardlow@stantec.com
Attachment: Comprehensive Plan Scope and Budget, Timeline, and team member resumes
c. Mark Statz, PE
Design with community in mind
Fay Simer brings a range of planning experience to her work with an emphasis on
University Avenue Redevelopment Plan, Green Bay, WI
translatingtechnical information to a wide variety of audiences. Fay uses a variety of
facilitation techniques, including dynamic presentations, advisory panel facilitation, focus
groups, openhouses, and small group facilitation to engage and inform meeting participants
and achieve desired meeting outcomes. Fay uses critical -thinking and problem -solving
Education skills to link project details with big picture goals.
Master of Urban and
Regional Planning, MnDOT High Bridge Community Workshops, St. Paul, MN
University of Minnesota The MnDOT asked Fay to lead community conversations about desirable bicycling, walking
Humphrey School, and driving improvements to the St. Paul High Bridge and adjacent roadways. MnDOT staff
Minneapolis, MN, 2009 wanted to engage the public early in the design process before key decisions were made.
Fay hosted a series of fun, community -centered workshops at local businesses including
BA, Macalester College, breweries, cafes, and restaurants. Interactive activities encouraged people to share their
St. Paul, MN, 2006 desired roadway improvements and develop a real understanding of the trade-offs MnDOT
makes to accommodate all users on a road. Fay's ability to develop appropriate messaging
and input opportunities was instrumental to creating meaningful and respectful
Registrations conversations through this project.
Certified Planner,
American Institute of Healthy Living Outreach, Cottage Grove, MN
Certified Planners As part of the City's comprehensive planning process, Stantec helped the City execute
innovative community engagement strategies, with a special effort towards reaching under-
represented groups. Fay led the outreach process, helping prepare an on-line survey that
asked residents about their top priorities for the future and access to healthy living
opportunities. She also coordinated the distribution of Facebook ads an
Green Bay's University Avenue corridor was the focus of assessment and planning work under
EPA grants to the city. Fay assisted with market research and report preparation for the study,
completed in 2014, which identified five brownfield catalyst sites and numerous other planning
and redevelopment opportunities along the four -mile University Avenue corridor between
downtown Green Bay and the University of Wisconsin -Green Bay. The project involved
working with city staff and a local advisory committee to decide the best strategies and
redevelopment plans for the corridor, which includes several former packing plant sites. The
plan envisions new housing, office, and mixed use development at key nodes along University
Avenue, tied together with gateway and streetscape elements.
Minnetonka Country Club Redevelopment, Shorewood, MN
Fay served as project coordinator throughout a six-month community engagement effortto
educate a citizen advisory panel about issues and opportunities created by planned
redevelopment of the 116 -acre Minnetonka Country Club site. Through a series of eight
workshops, Fay helped community members understand how redevelopment scenarios
could impact natural resources, stormwater retention, traffic, trails, and recreational
opportunities. Fay translated technical informationto community members and helped
them understand trade-offs associated with differentdevelopment scenarios; ultimately
resulting in group consensus.
d postcards at
community events targeted to a diverse collection of residents. As a result, the City is
developing a comprehensive plan that is more inclusive of all community members.
Green Bay's University Avenue corridor was the focus of assessment and planning work under
EPA grants to the city. Fay assisted with market research and report preparation for the study,
completed in 2014, which identified five brownfield catalyst sites and numerous other planning
and redevelopment opportunities along the four -mile University Avenue corridor between
downtown Green Bay and the University of Wisconsin -Green Bay. The project involved
working with city staff and a local advisory committee to decide the best strategies and
redevelopment plans for the corridor, which includes several former packing plant sites. The
plan envisions new housing, office, and mixed use development at key nodes along University
Avenue, tied together with gateway and streetscape elements.
Minnetonka Country Club Redevelopment, Shorewood, MN
Fay served as project coordinator throughout a six-month community engagement effortto
educate a citizen advisory panel about issues and opportunities created by planned
redevelopment of the 116 -acre Minnetonka Country Club site. Through a series of eight
workshops, Fay helped community members understand how redevelopment scenarios
could impact natural resources, stormwater retention, traffic, trails, and recreational
opportunities. Fay translated technical informationto community members and helped
them understand trade-offs associated with differentdevelopment scenarios; ultimately
resulting in group consensus.
Education
BS, University of
Minnesota, Minneapolis,
MN, 1978
BS, Landscape
Architecture, University
of Minnesota,
Minneapolis, MN, 1978
Registrations
College of Fellows,
American Institute of
Certified Planners
John Shardlow has extensive and wide-ranging project experience serving clients in both the
public and private sectors. He has frequently been called upon to lead multi -disciplinary teams
of consultants in completing large, complicated planning projects. John's skills include project
planning for residential, commercial, mixed-use, industrial, and institutional developments;
comprehensive and community planning; and preparing redevelopment plans, tax -increment
financing plans, subdivision regulations, and environmental assessments. He is a highly
experienced facilitator and an expert on innovative community engagement programs.
Select project experience
Burnsville Planning Services, Burnsville, MN
John's extensive involvement in the City ofBurnsvilles planning history spans almost four decades. John has
either prepared or helped prepare the City's last four comprehensive plans. In addition, John and the Stantec
team has reviewed hundreds of planning applications representing billions of dollars in tax capacity, and
delivered numerous special studies that set the stage for successful development in every segment of the
community. John also played a pivotal role in the development of Heart of the City, a is a community centerpiece
that recently was selected in the first round of Great Places within the Twin Cities.
Planning Consultant for 100+ Cities and Counties, MN
John has been extensively involved in a wide and diverse range ofplanning, zoning and development projects,
including numerous award-winning projects. His career has been particularly distinguished by innovative and
effective models for community participation in complicated and often controversial projects.
St. Cloud Area Joint Planning District Plan, St. Cloud, MN
John served as the principal in charge of the landmark St. Cloud regional plan that resulted in a joint plan for the
five cities and three counties surrounding St. Cloud. The St. Cloud Area Joint Planning District Plan was
designed to assist these communities in comprehensive planning and growth management efforts for 20 years or
more.
LCCMR Statewide Conservation and Preservation Plan, MN
Working with the University ofMinnesota Institute on the Environment, John served as a member of the proj-
ect's Core Management Team and chaired the Land Use Practices Team. This study is the most comprehensive
inventory and analysis of Minnesota's natural resources that has ever been produced. Its recommendations
present a vision and strategy for natural resource conservation andpreservation efforts for the next 50 years.
Dakota County Comprehensive Plan, Dakota County, MN
John facilitated a major multi -jurisdictional visioning effort to guide the County's comprehensive planning
process. The process successfully incorporated sustainability and a conservation ethic into future decision
making in the County.
CII - r.f B„in -: 116 C C�rF i e I.&f sl,.t Plum UF_dc,16 Re�),c'cI (�a f'r _i_c:.�l
Katrina Nygaard brings both planning and urban design experience to her work, with an
emphasis on community engagement and environmental justice. Katrina uses design and
planning skills to translate the intricacies of complex, technical problems for the people
these problems most affect. Katrina uses critical -thinking and problem -solving to link
community needs with big picture goals.
Education
Master of Urban and MnDOT High Bridge Community Workshops, St. Paul, MN
Regional Planning, MnDOT Metro District plans to repave Smith Avenue, Dodd Road, and the iconic St. Paul
University of Minnesota High Bridge. To address the needs of all roadway users, MnDOT staff asked Stantec to engage
Humphrey School, communities in St. Paul, West St. Paul, and Mendota Heights. Katrina developed a collection
Minneapolis, MN, 2015 of informational boards and twoactivities that engaged stakeholders, identified their
concerns with the project, and educated the public aboutthe many road design options
Metropolitan Design available and the associated tradeoffs. Stantec designed a community outreach process that
Certificate, University effectively created two-way conversation. Participants left with a greater understanding of
of Minnesota College of the constraints MnDOT faces in a design process. MnDOT staff left with a clear sense of
Design, Minneapolis, MN, community desires regarding the project.
2015
Cottage Grove Healthy Living Engagement, Cottage Grove, MN
BA, University of Chicago, Katrina worked with the City of Cottage Grove to develop and administer a survey about
Chicago, IL, 2013 opportunities for healthy living and food access in Cottage Grove. The survey was distributed
online and via post -card and has received over 400 responses. Katrina and the team's use of
Facebook Advertising for the survey helped to reach high numbers and diverse groups that
may not have participated otherwise.
26th & 28th Streets Bike and Pedestrian Imp rovemenis,Minneapolis, MN
Katrina assisted with community outreach for the City to understand public preferences
regarding the addition of protected bike lanes along a pair of one-way streets inMinneapolis.
These streets form a major east -west corridor across the city that traverses numerous
neighborhoods, hospitals, parks, and commercial nodes. The proposed bikewaysare intended
to improve local access to these destinations and pedestrian crossings. Katrina assisted in
public meetings and engaged with residents, community organizations and advocates
throughout the process.
Making Development Work: Tools for the Cleveland Neighborhood% Minneapolis, MN
To understand the impacts of new, community driven development for the Penn and Lowry
corridors in North Minneapolis, Katrina conducted a comprehensive corridor property
survey and case studies, and interviewed local business owners, government officialstand
neighborhood residents. She worked with the neighborhood association to develop a series of
tools and resources that educate local residents about the RFP process, forming
a cooperative, and parcel opportunities. By assuming a leadership role, the neighborhood
association can implement these tools to ensure future development serves their unique
needs. The project received an Einsweiler Best Project award from the Humphrey School of
Public Affairs.
` denotes projects completed with other firms
City of Roseville 2040 Comprehensive Plan Update Proposal
Hongyi Duan works on a variety of projects including comprehensive plans, special studies,
14W
environmental studies, corridor plans, transportation studies, bicycle and pedestrian plans
zoning and rezoning studies, market research, condemnations, and urban design. In additio
to her expertise in various GIS, drafting, and graphic software, Hongyi provides leadership
and project management abilities.
Education Minnetonka Country Club Redevelopment, Shorewood, MN
MS, Community and Hongyi served as GIS coordinator, providing all GIS -related research, mapping, and
Regional Planning, Iowa analysis for this project. Stantec assisted with a six-month community engagement effort to
State University, Ames, educate a citizen advisory panel about issues and opportunities created by planned
IA,1994 redevelopment of the 116 -acre Minnetonka Country Club site. Through a series of eight
workshops, Stantec helped community members understand how redevelopment scenarios
BA, Beijing Polytechnic could impact natural resources, stormwater retention, traffic, trails, and recreational
University, Beijing, China,
1990 opportunities.
Comprehensive Plan Update, Burnsville, MN
Stantec's extensive involvement in the City of Burnsville's planning history spans almost
four decades. We have prepared the City's last four comprehensive plans. Hongyi provided
all GIS -related research, mapping, and analysis tasks for the updates she was involved in.
Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Ordinance Update, Forest Lake, MN
Hongyi provided all GIS -related research, mapping, and analysis tasks. The recipient of a
2010 Minnesota APA Merit Award, the 2030 comprehensive plan incorporated the City's
parks,trails, and open space plan. The zoning ordinance update included sustainability
principlesand policies in all sections of the zoning ordinance.
Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Ordinance Update, Corcoran, MN
Hongyi provided all GIS related research, mapping, and analysis tasks for these projects.
Stantec assisted the City of Corcoran with updates to its 2030 Comprehensive Plan. Stantec
also assisted the City with updates to its corresponding zoning ordinance revisions based on
the Plan.
Comprehensive Plan Update, Lino Lakes, MN
Hongyi provided all GIS -related research, mapping, and analysis tasks for this project. This
2030 Comprehensive Plan helped the City create an innovative Green Infrastructure Plan to
manage surface water, enhance water quality, protect and restore wildlife corridors, and
provide natural amenities for citizens.
Central Corridor TOD Investment Framework, MN
Hongyi was responsible for data collection, management, and distribution, and conducted GIS
related -tasks for research, mapping, and analysis. Stantec assisted with creating a long-term
investment strategy for development along the Central Corridor. We facilitated the process,
conducted research, synthesized data and information, implemented the project
communications plan, and presented the information to a large stakeholder group.
n
Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Ordinance Update, Corcoran, MN
Hongyi provided all GIS related research, mapping, and analysis tasks for these projects.
Stantec assisted the City of Corcoran with updates to its 2030 Comprehensive Plan. Stantec
also assisted the City with updates to its corresponding zoning ordinance revisions based on
the Plan.
Comprehensive Plan Update, Lino Lakes, MN
Hongyi provided all GIS -related research, mapping, and analysis tasks for this project. This
2030 Comprehensive Plan helped the City create an innovative Green Infrastructure Plan to
manage surface water, enhance water quality, protect and restore wildlife corridors, and
provide natural amenities for citizens.
Central Corridor TOD Investment Framework, MN
Hongyi was responsible for data collection, management, and distribution, and conducted GIS
related -tasks for research, mapping, and analysis. Stantec assisted with creating a long-term
investment strategy for development along the Central Corridor. We facilitated the process,
conducted research, synthesized data and information, implemented the project
communications plan, and presented the information to a large stakeholder group.
Mark Powers EIT
Transportation Engineer -in -Training
Stantec
Mr. Powers joined Stantec in February 2015 as a Civil EIT and assists at all levels of traffic analysis. Mark has
experience with multiple simulation software packages including Synchro, Aimsun, and VISSIM. Mark also has
experience with crash analysis, data gathering, and data analysis.
EDUCATION
Bachelor of Civil Engineering with a Transportation
Focus, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis,
Minnesota, 2012
Bachelor of Science in Economics, Metropolitan
State University, Saint Paul, Minnesota, 2010
REGISTRATIONS
Engineer -In -Training # 143534, State of Minnesota
MEMBERSHIPS
Member, Institute of Transportation Engineers
PROJECT EXPERIENCE
Transportation Engineering
Northeast Minnesota State Veterans Cemetery,
Grand Lake Township, Minnesota
Mark performed the traffic analysis for the new State
Veteran's Cemetery at Pike Lake off of Trunk Highway 53,
northeast of Duluth, Minnesota. His analysis included needed
roadway geometry and lane lengths, crash history, and traffic
impact.
Old TH 14 Reconstruction, Waseca, Minnesota
Mark is currently conducting the Traffic Analysis for Old TH
14, the main east -west street through the city. He is
evaluating signal warrants and lighting warrants, conducting
crash analysis, and performing sensitivity analysis on all
possible build scenarios.
2nd Street Reconstruction, Rochester, Minnesota
Mark developed and ran simulations of the 2nd Street
corridor for its existing conditions as well as multiple different
scenarios for potential improvements. He researched the
crash history of the corridor and conducted crash analysis to
see if safety improvements were needed.
Mankato Avenue and Sarnia Street, Winona,
Minnesota
Mark conducted an intersection control evaluation through
the use of simulation and crash analysis.
Minnetonka Country Club Redevelopment,
Shorewood, Minnesota
Mark researched the crash history of the corridor and
conducted crash analysis to see if safety improvements were
needed. Used Trip generation manuals to see what the
expected added traffic impact would be with the completed
redevelopment.
MnDOT HOT Lanes*, Minneapolis, Minnesota
Mark preformed simulation modeling and calibration to aid in
the creation of a pricing algorithm for the MnDOT HOT lanes.
He conducted research on the safety and mobility of HOT
lanes design aspects. Mark's involvement on this project
included data analysis, formation of plots and graphs, report
writing, and leading a team in the data gathering process.
* denotes projects completed with other firms De�iui.Jif � --,i ni n, nil, it nir�d
Stantec
Centerville Comprehensive Plan Scope of Services
3.17.17
TASK
Principal-
In -Charge
GIs
Coordinator
Project
Manager
Planner
Transp.
Engineer
Muni cip.
Engineer
0
Shardlow Duan rimer Nygaard Powers Stotz
Expensesi Task Total
$ 240 $ 117 $ 137 $ 105 $ 111 $ 147.
2
1. KICK-OFF AND GOALS
4
2.1.e Identify future employment locations 1
1
4 4
2.1.f Identify development staging areas, Including timeline 1
1
1.1 Kickoff meeting with staff
2.1.g Identify redevelopment areas 1
1
3
3
1
3
$50
1.2 Assemble base maps and previous studies
8
2
2.2.b Acknowledge Community Roles for Community Designationy
1
1.3 Issues Identification and Plan Orientation: Planning Commission/Council workshop
1.4 Develop plan goals
8
1
1
8
2
12
8
description of allowed housing types, and net developable acreage for all areas guided
$150
1.5 Present plan goals to PC/Council and revise
residential) 1
2
4
6
1
2
$50
TASK TOTAL
$ 2,160
$ 936
$ 2,329
$ 3,045
$
$ 441
$ 250 $ 9,161
'
2. LAND USE: Future land use must be consistent with projections for growth
2.1 Ma ng
Fla Existing land use map (Including parks)
0
2.1.b Existing land use table
2.1.c Future land use map
3
30
2
2.1.d Future land use table
4
2.1.e Identify future employment locations 1
1
4 4
2.1.f Identify development staging areas, Including timeline 1
1
1
2.1.g Identify redevelopment areas 1
1
1
2.1.h Community Designation Map
1
2.2 Writing
2.2.aTable of forecasted population, households and employment for 2020, 2030,2040
2
2.2.b Acknowledge Community Roles for Community Designationy
1
2.2.c Existing Land use category descriptions _ A _
1
2.2.d Future land use category descriptions (include density ranges for residential density, a
description of allowed housing types, and net developable acreage for all areas guided
residential) 1
2
1 8
_ _ _
2.2.e Describe mix and proportion of land uses included in "Mixed Use" designation
1
2
2.2.f Describe natural resources and goals around these resources
2
2.2.g Describe special resources (historic/cultural, Mississippi River etc) and goals around
these resources
2
_ _ _
2.2.h List policies for solar access
2
_ _
2.2.1 Identify potential infrastructure impacts over next 30 years
1 5 5 i
2.2.j Develop land use specific goals and policies— �^
1 1
2.2.k Fi3r,;,ttlng document
4
2.3 Staff Coordination/Project Management 2 3 I
TASK TOTAL $ 1,440 $ 2,808 $ 1,233 $ 3,570 $ 555 $ 735 $ $ 10,341
3.1 Research
3.1.a Create Transportation Analysis zone table: allocate forcasted population and
employment
3
2
3.1.b Assess road need and suitability for bicycle features
1 2
—r -
2
i
3.1.c *for communities Impacted by an airport assess noise impacts and land use {
.compatibility
3.S.d'For communities with planned 2040 bus or LRT improvements, guide land use to
support transit usage
3.2 Mapping
3.2.a Map functional classification
3.2.b Map current traffic volumes --------__.__
3.2.c Map bike routes/trails existing and planned as well as regional bike network (how
6
2
I
_
4 _
connections work in local community)
I 2
3.2.d Map railways and rail yards —_
0
I
3.2.e Map airports
3.2.f Map transit existing and planned
0
0
j
3.2.g Map truckvoium_es (for freight routes)
—~�
2
2
3.2.h Map projected 2040 AADT
2
2
3.3 Writing
3.3.a Describe relationship of transportation system to guided growth
1
2
3.3.b Describe functional classification
2
1
3.3c Identify existing and future number of lanes I
0
3.3.d Describe recommendations from recent corridor studies
2
3.3e Incorporate MnDOT access management guidelines
1
2
3.3.f Identify transit routes, park and ride stations, transit stations or centers (existing and
future)-----
uture)---3.3.g
3.3.gIdentify future right of way that needs to be a uired ;
__.. - -__ ..—_ _.cam—_, -
2 2
3.3.h Describe existing and planned bicycling facilities
1
1
3.3.i Analyze and address the need for ped/bike facilities that remove major physical +
I
i
barriers
1
3.3.j Address pedestrian system needs
1
3.3.k Identity policies to protect regional airspace from obstructions
3.3.1 Identify nodes that may generate freight movement; e.g. industrial parks and shopping
areas
1
1
3.3.m Develop transportation specific goals and policies
2
2
3.3.n Formatting document
4
3.4 Staff Coordination/Project Management
2 3
5
960 $ 2,106 $ 822 $
1,890 $
444 $ 2,793 $ $ 9,015
4.1 Wastewater and Sewer Plan 0
4.2 Surface Water Management Plan 0
4.3 Water Supply Plan 0
4.4 Writing
4.4.a Develop water specific goals and policies 2
4.4.b Formatting document 4
4.6 Staff Coordination/Project Management 2 5
$ 480 $ $ 685 $ 630 $ $ $ $ 1,795
S. regional parks and UVs and indude natural resources
5.1 Mapping
5.1.a Map and label t e regions ,federal and state recreational lands within your
community
0
5.1.b Include parks in land use plan designated as "Park"
1 `
5.2 Writing
5.2.a Describe local park system (including local, regional, state and federal lands)
4 4
5.2.b Acknowledge Met Council approved master plan for regional parks in the community
1
5.2.c Include natural resources as part of park planning
4
5.2.d Develop parks specific goals and policies_ —
_ — —
5.2.e Formatting document
5
5.3 Staff Coordination/Project Management 2
3
TASK TOTAL $ 480 $
117 $ 959 $ 1,470 $ $ $ $ 3,026
Research
6.1.a Housing assesment: total number of units, total number of affordable units, housing
tenure, housing type (single or multifamily), number of publically subsidized homes 6
6.1.b Determine households experiencing cost burden 2
6.2 Mapping
6.2.a Ensure that housing needs meet future land use map 2 2
6.2.b Owner occupied housing map 0 ; 1
6.2.c Guide residential land at densities sufficient to create opportunities for affordable
housing 5 2
I.3 Writing
.3.a Summarize research 5 I
3.b A narrative analysis of existing housing needs. At a minimum address the components
the existing housing assessment within the local context of your community. _ 1 1 7
6.3.c Acknowledge allocation of affordable units.
6.3.d A description of programs, tools and financiaTdevices thaf can be useato address
housing need. __ --%-
6.3.e Develop housing specific goals and policies _ _
6.3.f Formatting document
6.4 Staff Coordination/Project Management
i 1 I 3
2
2 3
$ 960 $ 819 $ 548
7. IMPLEMENTATION PLAN
7.1 Writing
7.1.a Describe all public programs, fiscal devices, and other actions that your community will
use to implement your plan.
8.1 Public Engagement
B.I.a Public Hearing at Planning Commission
7
7 $150
8.1.b Presentation to City Council
4
1
8.1.c Agency and Met Council review
4
8.1.d Revisions to draft plan, closeout
2 2
6
TASK TOTAL
7.1.1b Define a timeline as to when actions will be taken to implement each required
element of your comprehensive plan.
1
PROJECT TOTAL
TOTAL BUDGET
$ 7,920 $ 6,786 $ 8,768
4
7.1.c Include a Capital Improvement Program (CIP) for transportation, sewers, parks, water
supply, and open space facilities. Specify the timing and sequence of major local public
investments.
4
6
Describe all relevant official controls addressing zoning, subdivision, water Supp y, an
private sewers.
4
7.1.e Include a schedule for the preparation, adoption, and administration of needed
changes to official controls.
4
7.1.f Formatting document
4
7.2 Staff Coordination/Project Management
2 3
TASK TOTAL
$ 960 $ $ 411 $ 2,520 $ $ 882 $ $ 4,773
B. PLAN ADOPTION
8.1 Public Engagement
B.I.a Public Hearing at Planning Commission
7
7 $150
8.1.b Presentation to City Council
4
4
8.1.c Agency and Met Council review
6
8.1.d Revisions to draft plan, closeout
2 2
6
TASK TOTAL
$ 480 $ - $ 1,781
$ 2,415 $ - $ - $ 150 $ 4,826
PROJECT TOTAL
TOTAL BUDGET
$ 7,920 $ 6,786 $ 8,768
$ 19,110 $ 999 $ 4,851 $ 400 $ 48,834
$ ;
(3 Stantec
Centerville Comprehensive Plan Timeline
3.17.17
2017 mi R
1.1 Kickoff meeting with staff
1.2 -Assemble base maps and previous studies
1.3 Issues Identification and Plan Orientation: Joint
Council/PC retreat
1.4 Develop plan goals
1.5 Present plan goals to PC/Council and revise 'mm MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM
2. LAND USE = MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM
6. HOUSING
B. PLAN ADOPTION
8.1 Public Engagement
8.1.a Public Hearing
Agency and Met Council review
,8.1.d Revisions to draft plan, closeout
Mike Ericson
From: Simer, Fay <Fay.Simer@stantec.com>
Sent: Monday, March 20, 2017 2:20 PM
To: Mike Ericson
Cc: Shardlow, John; Statz, Mark
Subject: Centerville Comp Plan Proposal 3.20.17.pdf
Attachments: Centerville Comp Plan Proposal 3.20.17.pdf
Hi Mike,
Attached is a revised proposal for Centerville's comprehensive plan reflecting changes we discussed at our
meeting last week. We're looking forward to getting started! Please let me know if you have any questions
about the proposal- I'm still happy to go through this with you and Charles via conference call later this week.
Cheers!
Fay Simer
Senior Planner
Stantec
2335 Highway 36 West„ St
Phone: (651) 967-4552
Fay.Simer@stantec.com
x `
Paul MN 55113-3819
The content of this email is the confidential property of Stantec and should not be copied, modified, retransmitted, or used for any purpose except with
Stantec's written authorization. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete all copies and notify us immediately.
Please consider the environment before printing this email.
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please visit http://www.syrnanteccloud.com
WSB
Building a legacy — your legacy.
May 18, 2017
Mr. Mike Ericson
City Administrator
City of Centerville
1880 Main Street
Centerville, MN 55038
Re: Proposal and Fee Estimate for Professional Services
2040 Comprehensive Plan
Dear Mr. Ericson:
701 Xenia Avenue South
Suite 300
Minneapolis, MN 55416
Tel: 763-541-4800
Fax: 763-541-1700
Per our conservation on April 28, 2017, WSB & Associates, Inc. (WSB) is pleased to present this proposal
to the City of Centerville to provide professional services for the creation of the 2040 Comprehensive
Plan Update. The City's 2030 comprehensive plan is a solid foundation from which to construct the City's
2040 Comprehensive Plan. Below is a listing of the proposed components to completing the Centerville
2040 Comprehensive Plan, and the cost for completion of these tasks. The proposal assumes WSB
completing only the required elements on the Metropolitan Council's checklist. WSB is also aware of
and will utilize the eight hours of Metropolitan Council GIS production assistance that the City has
secured. City staff will be providing guidance, comments and existing information for the production of
the 2040 comprehensive plan. We are happy to refine this scope, based on further conversation with
Centerville.
Task One: Plan Development
1.1 Redline review of 2030 Comprehensive Plan addressing the 2015 System Statement from the Met
Council for requirements of the City's 2040 Comprehensive Plan with specific focus on downtown
planning.
1.2 Housing Component. WSB Staff will compile all appropriate GIS and other data on housing.
1.2.1 Prepare exhibits including charts of the existing housing stock by age, type, tenure and value;
any institutional, senior, or subsided housing; and a map of owner -occupied housing units by value.
1.2.2 List of Centerville affordable housing tools and list the barriers to implementing additional tools
in compliance with the Metropolitan Council's Housing Policy Plan.
1.2.3 Create goals and implementation steps regarding housing based on existing community vision.
1.3 Demographic Component. WSB will examine demographic information on historic and projected
population and household growth, population age distribution, household tenure by age of
householder, and race and ethnicity
Equal Opportunity Employer
wsbeng.com
Mr. Ericson
May 18, 2017
Page 2
1.3.1 Examine Historic building permit and building permit valuation data.
1.3.2 2020, 2030 and 2040 Population, Household and Employment Forecast.
1.3.3 Prepare an exhibit of the community designation.
1.4 Land Use Component
1.4.1 Compile all appropriate GIS and other data on existing land uses.
1.4.2 Determine the amount and type of residential land uses needed to meet the requirements of
the Housing Policy Plan's affordable housing allocation and Centerville's growth forecasts.
1.4.3 Examine the 2030 Comprehensive Plan land use categories and determine if those land use
categories can be carried over into the 2040 Comprehensive Plan. Modify existing land use categories
or create new land use categories as needed.
1.4.4 Prepare charts of 2010 generalized land uses, the 2016 zoning districts, the existing 2030 land
use designations and the 2040 land use designations.
1.4.5 Prepare maps of the 2010 generalized land uses, the existing 2030 Land Use Map, the 2040 Land
Use Map including the 2030 and the 2040 MUSAs.
1.4.6 Create goals and implementation steps for land use and growth management based on the
community vision, the meetings and feedback gathered, and with Planning Commission and City
Council assistance.
1.4.7 Address the statutory requirements regarding aggregate resources and solar access.
1.5 Transportation Component
1.5.1 Traffic Analysis Zones (TAZs). WSB staff will allocate Met Council 2010, 2030, 2030 and 2040
population, employment and housing data by Traffic Analysis Zone (TAZ) based on an approved
City of Centerville Land Use Plan.
1.5.2 Roadways. WSB staff will prepare a Roadway Component of the overall Transportation Plan.
The Roadway Component will include existing and planned functional classification, existing
roadway lanes and existing/forecasted traffic volumes. Access management guidelines will be
discussed and incorporated into the final plan document along with any future needs for right-of-
way preservation.
1.5.3 Bicycling and Walking. WSB staff will prepare a Bicycling and Walking Component of the
overall Transportation Plan.
1.5.4 Freight. WSB staff will prepare a Freight Component of the chapter. Existing freight
infrastructure, such as railroads, major truck routes and freight generators will also be mapped
and potential projects and strategies to improve freight mobility will be identified.
Mr. Ericson
May 18, 2017
Page 3
1.6 Complete draft of the 2040 Comprehensive Plan. WSB will provide a complete draft of the 2040
Comprehensive Plan for City Staff to review.
1.6.1 WSB will address City Staff comments of the complete draft plan once comments are received
from all reviewing staff.
1.7 Final draft of the 2040 Comprehensive Plan per any revisions provided by the Metropolitan Council.
Task Two: Public Involvement
2.1 Community Event. Attend a City event to gather comprehensive plan feedback from community
members.
2.2 Online Engagement. WSB staff will provide content for one social media post per month for City Staff
to publish onto City run social media pages.
2.3 Planning Commission Meetings (up to 2 meetings). WSB Staff will attend up to two planning
commission meetings to review components of the draft plan.
2.4 Draft Comprehensive Plan Open House. WSB staff will plan, prepare, market, and facilitate one
meeting to present the draft Goals, Policies and Land Use Map intended to inform the public and to
gather comments and/or concerns before the Public Hearing.
2.5 City Council Meetings (up to 2 meetings). One meeting before the Draft Comprehensive Plan Public
Meeting, and one meeting to Preliminarily Adopt the Comprehensive and authorize its submittal to
the Metropolitan Council. City Staff will be responsible for the City Council meeting for formal
adoption of the Comprehensive Plan. Joint meetings with the Planning Commission will be
encouraged when applicable.
Task Three: Prosect Management
3.1 Project Initiation. WSB Staff will create a project plan and allocate project budget according to the
scope outlined in this letter proposal.
3.2 Meeting with City Staff (1 meeting). WSB will coordinate one meeting with City Staff to discuss
project progress and any other project related items.
3.3 Monthly Project Updates. WSB Staff will prepare monthly project progress updates for City Staff.
3.4 Distribute the draft Comprehensive Plan to the affected jurisdictions per the Metropolitan Council
requirements.
Total Project Costs of Tasks 1 through 3: $33,000.00
Mr. Ericson
May 18, 2017
Page 4
Additional meetings or draft revisions not outlined in the above scope of services will be charged at staff's
hourly billing rate. The above scope of services does not include components of the comprehensive plan
related to water resources which includes sewer, water, or surface water.
Sincerely,
WSB & Associates, Inc.
Breanne Rothstein
City Planner
ACCEPTED:
CITY OF CENTERVILLE
By:
Date:
5 Stantec
April 26, 2017
File: 193803811
Attention: Mike Ericson
City Administrator
City of Centerville
188o Main Street
Centerville, MN 55038
Reference: City of Centerville Local Water Plan
Dear Mike,
Thank you for the opportunity to serve the City of Centerville by completing an update to the
City's Local Water Plan (LWP). This letter presents Stantec's proposal for engineering services
based on the task list as detailed below.
The plan will focus on meeting the latest regulatory minimum requirements as required by the
state (MN Rules 8410), Metropolitan Council, and the Rice Creek Watershed District. We look
forward to working with the City to update the previous LWP from 2012.
LOCAL WATER PLAN TASKS
1. PROJECT INITIATION/MANAGEMENT
a. Hold a kickoff meeting with City staff to discuss the City's needs, refine study goals and
expectations, and confirm the work plan for the project.
b. Develop a schedule of progress meetings. We have budgeted for only the kickoff
meetings. If progress meetings are desired, they can be done at an additional cost to
the project.
2. DATA COLLECTION
a. At the kickoff meeting, discuss data needed for the study. This information could
include (electronic files preferred):
i. System mapping, topography, and aerial photography
ii. Physical system data (storm sewer base mapping, including pipe sizes and
invert elevations; pond grading plans; emergency overflow locations and
elevations; water quality data)
iii. Impaired waters listings and TMDL information
iv. MS4 program information
v. Land use
vi. Capital improvement plan
vii. Street reconstruction program
viii. Water resource related agreements
Design with community in mind
(3
April 26, 2017
Mike Ericson
Page 2 of 7
Reference: City of Centerville Local Water Plan
ix. Past studies and reports
x. Known problem areas
b. Follow up with City staff to obtain the available information.
3. PREPARE LOCAL WATER PLAN UPDATE
a. Update LWP report to be consistent with latest state (MN Rules 8410), Metropolitan
Council, and watershed requirements. We understand that the City is looking to make
minor updates to their LWP to meet the requirements of the regulatory agencies
mentioned above. Currently the City's LWP has the following sections:
i. Executive Summary,
ii. Introduction;
iii. Physical Environment;
iv. Hydrologic Calculations/Modeling Parameters;
v. Water Resource Management Objectives and Policies;
vi. Water Resource Management Plan;
vii. Implementation Program;
viii. Capital Improvements Plan;
ix. Storm Water Charges;
x. Amendment Process; and
A. Appendices
b. To meet the minimum requirements, the sections below will need to be modified. A
Current Assessment section will also need to be created to meet the new minimum
requirements:
i. Executive Summary: The executive summary will summarize and give
highlights from the overall LWP. It allows the casual user to have a quick
understanding of the background, purpose, and scope of the LWP. Stantec will
review the current executive summary and update it to include the new
highlights of the plan.
ii. Introduction: The introduction of the LWP was originally intended to give a
clear definition of why it is required and important for the City to have a LWP
and to give the requirements of the governing authorities to keep the City's
LWP in compliance. We will review and update this section so the viewer can
easily identify the minimum requirements set forth by the governing agencies.
This section will be updated to reflect the new LWP review timeline, which is
now part of the ten-year Comprehensive Plan cycle. Instead of serving as a
stand-alone document as it previously did, the LWP will now be incorporated
as an appendix to the Comprehensive Plan.
Design with community in mind
5
April 26, 2017
Mike Ericson
Page 3 of 7
Reference: City of Centerville local Water Plan
iii. Physical Environment: The current plan covers general information
regarding the general location, geology and topography, soils, climate, lakes
and other significant waterbodies, wetlands, land use, utility systems, unique
areas, zoning and floodplain management, and groundwater characteristics of
the City. The LWP will detail drinking water supply management areas
(DWSMA) and the city's plan for addressing/protecting groundwater. The Plan
will discuss groundwater discharge and recharge areas including the
identification of potential land uses affecting groundwater. The City will update
land use and zoning maps for present and future conditions, as well as a land
cover classification map, such as Minnesota Land Cover Classification System
(MLCCS) maps. Key Conservation Areas will be identified. We will specifically
review the impaired waters list under the water resources section and compare
it to the most recent 3o3d impaired waters list from the Minnesota Pollution
Control Agency. A map of these waters will be provided. Water bodies with
TMDis will be listed in this section. For Centerville, these include Peltier Lake
& Centerville Lake TMDL, Lino Lakes Chain of Lakes TMDL, Upper Mississippi
River TMDL. The Upper Mississippi River TMDL for bacteria has been set
recently, so we will discuss actions for addressing the TMDL in this section. We
will perform a review to this information and work with the City to verify any
changes or additions that are needed to remain in compliance with the section.
iv. Hydrologic Calculations/Modeling Parameters: This section covers the
water quantity and NURP standards when designing storm water ponds and
other stormwater features. We will update the design storm parameters to
reflect the new NOAA Atlas 14 Rainfall data that has become the new industry
standard. The LWP will address physical changes to the stormwater system,
and if there are changes, these will be reflected in an updated map of the
system. It is our understanding there is not a City-wide stormwater model for
the City of Centerville and this proposal does not include time for the
development of any hydrologic or hydraulic modeling. Stantec is aware the Rice
Creek Watershed District has created a district -wide hydrologic and hydraulic
model. Stantec well request to obtain a portion of the model that includes the
City of Centerville to try to gather information on drainage areas and paths of
stormwater runoff, as well as to provide information about future conditions
and intercommunity flows. The model outputs might also help identify and
acknowledge future changes to structures that have potential for overtopping,
as well as impacts of future land use changes on peak water elevations at
storage areas that are currently at risk to flooding due to the more intense
storms that are occuring. Additionally, RCWD requires an updated floodplain
map, which will also be acquired by the RCWD and based on their District -
Wide Model.
v. Water Resources Management Objectives and Policies: The current
water resources management objectives and policies cover items related to:
water quantity; water quality; recreation; fish and wildlife; enhancements of
public participation through information and education; public ditch systems;
Design with community in mind
5
April 26, 2017
Mike Ericson
Page 4 of 7
Reference: City of Centervllle Local Water Plan
groundwater; wetlands; and erosion. Stantec will review each objective and
policy and recommend revisions to the City based on requirements of the
watersheds and other agencies with jurisdiction in the City of Centerville that
are currently stricter than the City's requirements. Specific RCWD regulations
require that the City address 1) its volume debit and how to the City plans to
address this debit, 2) strategies in place to manage water volumes in land-
locked areas to minimize flooding, and 3) opportunities for stormwater reuse.
vi. Water Resources Management Plan: The water resources management
plan section highlights the requirements the City currently enforces to meet the
water resources management objectives and policies section. We will review
this section and make revisions based on the new requirements. We will also
review the City's official controls to ensure we are staying consistent with your
codes and ordinances. If we feel your ordinances and codes could be updated
during our review, we would make those recommendations to the City. We will
specifically review the water quality section to ensure the protection methods in
place are adequate to meet the official controls. This section will also include an
assessment of the existing and potential water resources related problem within
the City, and potential funding opportunities for the City. Reuse opportunities
will be identified, in accordance with RCWD's rules.
vli. Implementation Program and Capital Improvement Projects (CIP):
Stantec will work with the City to update your implementation plan. We will
evaluate the items in the current Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) in section S
of the LWP and determine what items have been accomplished, what items are
no longer applicable to the CIP, and what items have yet to be completed. To be
in compliance with the new regulations, we will create a CIP table to include the
schedule of each project, the estimated cost of each project, and the funding
source of each project, in addition to a year by year analysis. This table will
prioritize the nonstructural, programmatic, and structural solutions we have
identified. An additional table will be created that describes each component of
the implementation program that will detail the schedule, estimated cost, and
funding sources for each component including annual budget totals. As part of
the implementation plan, Stantec will clearly define the roles and
responsibilities of the community for carrying out the implementation
components of the LWP.
vill. Stormwater Charges: This section discusses the stormwater utility fees that
are charged to City residential, commercial, industrial properties as well as new
development. We do not anticipate a change to the stormwater utility fee
section. If the City would like to revisit this section and update, Stantec can
work with the City to update their stormwater utility fee for an additional fee.
ix. Amendment Procedures: The current amendment procedures section of
the LWP discusses the amendments and future updates process. Stantec will
review this section as well as the watershed organization plans to verify the
review and adoption process still meets the requirements of the local watershed
Design with commun'rfy in mind
5
April 26, 2017
Mike Ericson
Page 5 of 7
Reference: City of Centerville local Water Plan
organizations. If necessary, we will update the LWP to clearly define the
process by which amendments are made to the LWP that follow the watershed
organizations' procedures.
x. Technical Appendices: The following maps are included in the appendix of
the City's LWP: Location Map; USGS Topographic Map; NRCS Soils Map;
National Wetland Inventory mapping; MLCCS Land Cover Map; Existing Land
Use Plan; 2030 Future Land Use Plan; Zoning Map; Floodplain Map; Storm
Sewer & Drainage Basin Map; and the Capital Improvement Plan Map. We
envision changes to these maps being minor updates. We will work with the
City to verify any changes that must be made to these maps and coordinate with
the City's comprehensive land use plan team to obtain their updated land use
plan and 2040 future land use plan for the report. We will include the City's
SWPPP as technical appendix, as well as MnDNR approved Floodplain &
Shoreland ordinances, if applicable. Currently the following codes are included
in the City's LWP: City Code Chapter 157: Erosion Control; City Code Chapter
155: Flood Damage Prevention; and City Code Section 156.133: Special
Provisions Related to Development or Building on Lands within loo Feet of
Centerville Lake, Peltier Lake, or Clearwater Creek. We will work with the City
to identify any other codes that are applicable to this LWP and attach it as part
of the LWP.
4. LOCAL WATER PLAN REPORT DELIVERABLE
a. Prepare a user-friendly report that can be read by a non-technical audience yet still
provides sufficiently detailed technical data for use by the City in storm sewer
planning.
b. Include graphics, figures and maps to clarify items discussed in the report.
c. Provide draft and final reports as follows:
i. First draft for City staff review
ii. Second draft for submittal to watersheds and Metropolitan Council
1. Respond to review comments and update report accordingly
iii. Final report for City approval and use
d. Prepare a separate reproducible summary suitable for public distribution.
e. Present the results of the report at a City Council or other public meeting, at the City's
direction.
COMPENSATION AND SCHEDULE
Stantec proposes to provide the City of Centerville with professional engineering services
required to provide the services described herein regarding the Local Water Plan. Upon
receiving authorization to proceed with the project, Stantec will set up a kickoff meeting and
Design with community in mind
5
April 26, 2017
Mike Ericson
Page 6 of 7
Reference: CMy of Centerville Local Wafer Plan
commence data collection and model updating. Stantec anticipates providing the completed,
draft surface water plan for city review within six months of the authorization to proceed. We
would be happy to adjust our schedule to meet the needs of the City. The team providing
services will include Dan Edgerton as project manager and Tyler Johnson as lead engineer, with
others supporting as needed.
Stantec will provide services on an hourly basis and estimates the level of effort required to be
$24,000 in accordance with the above work plan. Reimbursable expenses are included in this
proposed figure. Stantec will not exceed the hourly amount without further authorization from
you.
This letter represents the understanding between the City and Stantec in respect to the Project
and may only be modified in writing signed by both of us and is subject to the current Master
Services Agreement between the City of Centerville and Stantec.
Design with community in mind
(3
April 26, 2017
Mike Ericson
Page 7 of 7
Reference: City of Centerville Local Water Plan
If this letter satisfactorily sets forth the conditions of our Agreement, please sign in the space
below and return one copy to our office. We very much appreciate the opportunity to provide
these services.
Please contact us if you have any specific questions; either Mark Statz at 651.604.4709 or Tyler
Johnson at 651.604.4767.
-4-
Mark Statz, PE
Associate
-j5�1 15A -
Tyler Johnson, PE
Project Manager
Design with community in mind
City of Centerville
By
Print Name and Title
Date
S�-1Q�-f
XRCWO
RUE CRfEK WATERSFR•U USTW
LOCAL WATER PLAN REVIEW CHECKLIST
(Created from Chapter 8, Section 8.3.1 of 2010 RCWD Watershed Management Plan (WMP) & references
requirements listed in Minnesota Statute 1038.235 Subd. 2 & Minnesota Rule 8410.0160. Please note that this
checklist is meant to be a tool & should not replace the requirements as listed in rule/statute or the District's WMP)
GENERAL STANDARDS AND STATUTE/RULE REQUIREMENTS
— Provide an executive summary that includes the highlights of the local water plan.
Describe any water resource management related agreements that have been entered by your
community. This includes joint powers agreements related to water management that the community
may be a party to between itself and watershed management organization(s), adjoining communities, or
private parties.
_ Include a section on amendment procedures that defines the process by which amendments may
be made. The amendment procedure must be consistent with the amendment procedures in the
watershed organization (s) plans that affect your community.
Describe the existing and proposed physical environment and land use.
— Include land use and zoning maps for present and future conditions.
_ Include land cover classification map, such as MLCCS (Minnesota Land Cover Classification System).
Define drainage areas and the volumes, rates, and paths of stormwater runoff.
_ Include a map of the stormwater system that shows stormwater ponds, streams, lakes and
wetlands, structural pollution devices (grit chambers, separators), pipes and pipe sizes, ditches, any
other conveyances, outfalls/discharge points (note that these items can be included as separate figures).
_ Include inspection and maintenance system schedule of stormwater features (can include MS4
portion by reference).
Discuss or identify approaches, methods, means, procedures, ordinances, or plans being used to
achieve compliance w/RCWD rules or reliance on RCWD for municipal review and compliance with
stormwater management requirements.
Provide a specific statement that the community requests the RCWD to continue to implement its
rules and regulations and issue permits within the community.
_ Describe methods that will be used to control and manage post -construction stormwater associated
with development and re -development (can include MS4 SWPPP permit by reference).
_ Provide proof that the community discharge is equal to or less than the community rates
established in the RCWD Modeling.
Acknowledge and identify locations where flows leave the community and are transferred
downstream, with some assessment of the estimated rate assuming full build -out conditions, and
describe measures being implemented to reduce flows if necessary. Identify whether these flows are
,NRCWD
WE (WKWA1ERMONSTWT
problematic to manage, generally describe one or more methods for managing these flows, and identify
whether assistance from RCWD is needed.
_ Identify regulated areas such as Resource Management Plan (RMP) areas, Wetland Protection
Zones, Ecological Management Corridor, High Quality Wetlands, MN County Biological Survey.
_ Set forth an implementation program, including a description of official controls and, as
appropriate, a capital improvement program. Clearly define responsibilities of the local government unit
(LGU) from that of RCWD for carrying out implementation components.
_ Include a table that briefly describes each component of the implementation program and clearly
details the schedule, estimated cost, and funding sources for each component including annual budget
totals.
Include an assessment of the existing water resource related problems in your community.
Include an assessment of the potential water resource related problems in your community.
_ Include a prioritized nonstructural, programmatic, and structural solutions to identified problems.
_Include a list or map of impaired waters within your community as shown on the most current 303d
impaired waters list.
OTHER WATERSHED REQUIREMENTS
(Please note these requirements are for RCWD. There may be other watershed organizations within your
community with different requirements)
_ Identify land -locked sub -watershed units and basins and strategies to manage water volumes in
land -locked areas to minimize flooding.
_ Identify impaired water bodies and establish policies and actions to address TMDL goals.
— Identify Key Conservation Areas in your community and assess the adequacy of local policies and
regulatory control in place to conserve hydrology and ecologic value of the resources in the area. The
plan must set forth a strategy and schedule for the amendment of those policies and controls as
necessary to meet performance standards established in plans.
_ Discuss geologic features, groundwater sensitivity, groundwater dependent natural resource, and
groundwater discharge and recharge areas Including the identification of potential land uses affecting
groundwater.
— Identify ideas and opportunities for projects and programs intended to improve resource
management, which many be jointly implemented with the RCWD.
_ Describe the conformance of the municipality with NPDES requirements for MS4 permits, including
TMDL and Non -degradation (if applicable) requirements. Must include the SWPPP or a summary of its
content and incorporate the plan by reference.
_ Identify erosion and sediment ordinances for sites less than 1 acre in size.
SCRCWD
Wf (AMWATFMO NSW
_ Describe housekeeping requirements such as street sweeping, snow plowing, salt and snow storage,
and public land maintenance. (Can use MS4 by reference).
_ Describe the Best Management Practices employed by the City/Town that reduce or control
pollutants. (Can use MS4 by reference).
_ Demonstrate a public information and education plan related to managing sediment and erosion
control, runoff and water quality. (Can use MS4 by reference).
_ Include a groundwater protection component consistent with the county groundwater management
plan. (At this time, relevant to Washington County only. Ramsey County does not have an approved
groundwater management plan).
_ Discuss conflict between infiltration requirements and wellhead protection.
Adopt & include copies of MnDNR approved Floodplain & Shoreland when mandated by state law.
_ Include a discussion on stormwater reuse opportunities.
Utilize RCWD resources to identify and describe problem areas, such as floodplain increases or
stormwater capacity limitations.
_Identify and acknowledge future changes in peak elevation at critical road crossings for critical
structure maximum water elevations, modeling shows potential for overtopping. (see HEI, 2016
Appendix A, Figure 15). Describe management needs and strategies, and identify necessary RCWD
management assistance.
_Identify and acknowledge the impacts of future land use changes on peak water elevation at storage
areas near current flooding problem areas (see HEI, 2016 Figures 12-14, Table 13). Describe
management needs and strategies, and identify necessary RCWD management assistance.
_Identify and acknowledge changes in floodplain elevation and regulatory floodplain boundaries (see
HEI, 2016 Figure 20). Describe management needs and strategies, and identify necessary RCWD
management assistance.
_Identify the amount, if any, of remaining volume control debit previously incurred through the
regulatory program, and describe previous and future activities to ensure reasonable progress toward
eliminating the volume control debit within the next plan cycle.
LEVEL 2 CITIES
(in addition to the requirements above, cities wishing to adopt official controls to pursue permitting authority must
include the additional information and detail below, see WMP 8.3.1)
_ The local plan must include information on existing and proposed stormwater rates and volumes
based on full build -out taking into account implementation of the local regulatory control. The
information should be related to those volume and rate control locations within the District and include
analyses on Regional Assessment Locations.
6%RCWD
RKE (REEK WATERMO NStw
_ Identify the methods and means to achieve Rule C, Part 5, Water Quality and Volume Control of the
RCWD rules.
Identify areas and elevations for stormwater storage adequate to meet Rule C, Part 6, Peak
Stormwoter Runoff Control and RCWD Rules.
_Include specific local ordinances and demonstrate that they're in compliance with RCWD rules or
include at a minimum that the City adopts RCWD rules and regulation by reference. (see Ch. 8.3.2)
_ Acknowledge and identify those locations where flows leave the City and are transferred
downstream, with an assessment of how the rules applied by the City under current full build-out
conditions to reduce flows if necessary. Identify whether these flows are problematic to manage,
generally describe one or more methods for managing these flows, and identify whether assistance
from the RCWD Is needed.
SUBMITTALS
_ Met Council (45 -day review period)
Watershed Districts (60 -day review period, incorporates comments of Met Council)
_ Washington County (45 -day review period)
Please contact Lauren Sampedro at 763-398-3078 or at Isampedro ricecreek.org for any
questions, or to set up a pre -submittal meeting to discuss the plan requirements and any
known problem areas within your community. To aid in a timely review, the District asks
that you complete this checklist prior to submitting your local plan.
(B) General minimum requirements. The following minimum requirements, as set forth, shall apply to all
buildings that may be erected, converted or structurally altered in commercial districts.
(C) Off-street parking. Off-street parking shall be provided as required in this chapter.
(D)Buffer zone between commercial and residential districts. Where a commercial district abuts a
residential district, any new development shall include a buffer zone. There shall be a protective strip of
not less than ten feet in width. This protective strip shall contain no structures, shall not be used for
parking, off-street loading or storage, and shall be landscaped. The landscape treatment shall include a
compact screen wall or fence, but shall not extend within 15 feet of the street right-of-way. The planting
or fence design must be approved by the site plan review process. The site plan review process requires
review by the Planning and Zoning Committee and the City Council, as set forth in this chapter.
(E) Screening requirements. If the City Council requires any type of screening as a condition for a variance,
conditional use, or interim use permit, the applicant shall comply with the following conditions:
(1) File a copy of the screening plans with the Zoning Administrator;
(2) The screening, planting or construction, or both shall be complete within one year from the date
of the building permit, subject to extension by the City Council; and
(3) The screening shall be maintained after completion.
(F) Landscaping. A minimum of ten percent of any lot shall be green space. Three percent of the surface
area of the land within a parking area shall be landscaped with grass and shrubbery or other approved
ground cover. Landscaped areas will continue to be maintained by the property owner on a continuous
basis. Green areas within abutting street rights-of-way will also be maintained by the property owner.
Other requirements are set forth in this chapter.
(G)Accessory Structures. Garages, accessory structures, screen walls, buildings and exposed areas of
retaining walls shall be of similar type, quality and appearance as the principal structure. The height of
an accessory structure shall not exceed the height of the principal structure.
(H)Permitted encroachments. The following shall not be considered as encroachments on setbacks subject
to other conditions within this chapter: off-street parking spaces, flues, belt course, leaders, sills, pilaster,
lintels, cornices, eaves, gutters, awnings, open terraces, service station pump islands, open canopies,
steps, chimneys, flagpoles, ornamental features, open fire escapes, sidewalks and fences, except as
hereinafter amended.
(I) Driveways.
(1) No driveway shall be located within 100 feet of any right-of-way line of a street intersection.
The distances shall be measured along the property line from the corner right-of-way and county
line.
339 1 Page
(2) Access drive onto county roads shall require a review by the City Engineer. This review shall be
measured along the property line from the corner right-of-way and county line.
(J) Refuse.
(1) Garbage and rubbish containers shall be placed at the rear of the premises or in a manner as to be
out of view from the street. In no event shall containers or their enclosures be placed or
maintained in a way to unreasonably interfere with the use or enjoyment of adjoining property.
(2) All garbage containers shall be screened with a suitable enclosure.
(K)Permitted uses. See Table 156-A.1.
(1) Uses not explicitly enumerated in this section as permitted uses, but closely similar thereto as
determined by the Planning and Zoning Commission, provided these uses are not explicitly
mentioned as permitted or conditional uses elsewhere in this Chapter.
(L) Conditional uses.
(1) Automobile and motorized equipment sales and service, excluding salvage operations, provided;
(a) the outside sales lot shall not be larger in square footage than the one and one-half times
the square footage of the building devoted to the related business.
(b) the sales lot used to park vehicles to be sold or serviced shall be separate and distinct
from the area of the premises used to park vehicles necessary to satisfy the minimum
parking required by this Code.
(c) all repair assembly, disassembly, or maintenance of vehicles shall occur within a closed
building except minor maintenance including tire inflation, adding oil and wiper
replacement. Vehicles that are inoperable or are missing body parts shall be stored inside
a building or in a properly screened area, provided however that vehicles which are
inoperable, missing body parts, or are unlicensed may not be stored outside a building
longer than 90 days.
(2) Farm implements sales and service;
(a) the outside equipment storage lot shall not be larger in square footage than one and one-
half times the square footage of the building devoted to the related business.
(b) all repair assembly, disassembly, or maintenance of vehicles and implements shall occur
within a closed building except minor maintenance including tire inflation, adding oil,
and wiper replacement. Vehicles that are inoperable or are missing body parts shall be
stored inside a building.
3401Page
(3) Building supply sales and storage yards;
(a) the outside equipment and inventory storage lot shall not be larger in square footage than
one and one-half times the square footage of the building devoted to the related business.
(4) Funeral homes and mortuaries;
(5) Animal clinics.
(M) Commercial exterior building materials.
(1) Except as otherwise regulated herein, the exterior wall surfaces of all new or expanded
commercial buildings shall consist of face brick, finished block or other textured masonry
product approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission.
(2) Exceptions to all masonry exteriors may be considered and approved by the Planning and Zoning
Commission provided the following findings are met:
(a) The combination of exterior materials is used as an architectural complement to the
structure;
(b) The combination of exterior materials used is not inconsistent with the quality and
appearance used on similar buildings in the same zoning district or neighborhood;
(c) Site conditions limit public exposure to certain exterior surfaces where masonry products
are not proposed; and
(d) An exterior wall may be temporary and a future expansion area of a structure and be
subject to removal or redesign as an interior wall.
(3) Buildings are required to have contrasting architectural features and must be designed to be
aesthetically pleasing.
(N)Interim uses in B-1 District.
(1) Industrial uses that existed on a site in the I-1 Industrial district as a legal, fully conforming use
prior to the site being rezoned from I-1 to B-1, may continue and be expanded on that site as if
located in an I-1 District until the use is changed to a use that is permitted in this district. After it
is changed to a use permitted the B-1 district, it may not thereafter be used except as permitted in
this district. Where the proposed change from I-1 to B-2 has been initiated by the City, the
Planning and Zoning Commission shall simultaneously with making such zoning change,
determine whether such parcel is a fully conforming industrial use qualifying for interim use
status. Where a positive determination is made, the action shall be filed with the Anoka County
Recorder.
341 1 Page
Ord. 2d, #37, Amended 09/22/2010, Ord. 2d, #40. Amended 12/22/2010, Ord. 2d # 46, amended 03/23/2011,
Ord. 2d # 56, amended 05/09/2012
Cross-reference:
Setbacks, see Appendix A, Table 1, Schedule of District Regulations Lot and Yard Requirements
Requirements and Table 156-A.1 District Allowed Uses
Signs, see Chapter 152
§§ 156.031 THROUGH 156.039 RESERVED FOR FUTURE USE.
§ 156.040 INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT (I-1).
(A)Purpose. It is intended that the 1-1 District provide opportunities for light manufacturing and industrial
uses, trade businesses, machine shops and other more extensive land uses.
(B) General minimum requirements. The following minimum requirements, as set forth herein, shall apply
to all buildings that may be erected, converted or structurally altered in industrial districts.
(C)Setbacks. Specific setbacks are set forth in Appendix A, Table 1, District Regulations Lot and Yard
Requirements. In addition, side yards facing streets on corner lots shall be considered the same as front
yards. Where a front yard or side yard of a corner lot faces a residential district across a street, the
setback from the street shall be not less than 60 feet.
(D) Off-street parking. Off-street parking shall be provided as required by this chapter. All open street
parking areas having more than six parking spaces shall be effectively screened by a wall, fence of
acceptable design or compact hedge along all sides which adjoin or are directly across the street from
the property in a residential zone or institutional use. The wall, fence or hedge shall be maintained in
good condition. Plans for fencing shall be approved by the City Council. The fence shall not be used for
advertising purposes.
(E) Buffer zone between industrial and residential districts. Where the side yard of any industrial district
abuts a residential district, the minimum side yard setback shall be 60 feet. Parking of vehicles will be
permitted within 40 feet of the side yard line. All side yard areas not utilized for parking shall be
landscaped with screening provided along the side lot line to within 15 feet of any public right-of-way.
(F) Screening requirements. If the City Council requires any type of screening as a condition for a variance
or, conditional use, or interim use the applicant shall comply with the following conditions:
(1) File a copy of the screening plans with the Zoning Administrator;
(2) The screening, planting or construction, or both shall be complete within one year from the date
of building permit, subject to extension by the City Council;
342 1 Page
(3) The screening shall be maintained after completion; and
(4) A dollar amount of one and one-half times the estimated cost of planting and construction of the
screening shall be filed with the city in the form of a cash escrow or letter of credit. The cash
escrow or letter of credit amount shall be forfeited to the city if any provisions of this section are
violated.
(G)Landscaping. A minimum of ten percent of any lot shall be green space. Three percent of the surface
area of the land within a parking area shall be landscaped with grass and shrubbery or other approved
ground cover. Landscaped areas will continue to be maintained by the property owner on a continuous
basis. Green areas within abutting street rights-of-way will also be maintained by the property owner.
Additional landscaping regulations are set forth in § 156.116.
(H)Accessory structures. Garages, accessory structures, screen walls and exposed areas of retaining walls
shall be of similar type, quality and appearance as the principal structure. Accessory structures shall
comply with other requirements of this chapter.
(I) Permitted encroachments. The following shall not be considered as encroachments on setbacks subject
to other conditions within this chapter: off-street parking spaces, flues, belt course, leaders, sills, pilaster,
lintels, cornices, eaves, gutters, awnings, open terraces, service station pump islands, open canopies,
steps, chimneys, flagpoles, ornamental features, open fire escapes, sidewalks and fences, except as
hereinafter amended.
(J) Driveways.
(1) No driveway shall be located within 100 feet of any right-of-way line of a street intersection.
This distance shall be measured along the property line from the corner right-of-way line.
(2) Access drives onto county roads shall require a review by the City Engineer.
(K) Refuse.
(1) Garbage and rubbish containers shall be placed at the rear of the premises or in a manner as to be
out of view from the street. In no event shall containers or their enclosures be placed or
maintained in a way to unreasonably interfere with the use or enjoyment of adjoining property.
(2) All garbage containers shall be screened with a suitable enclosure.
(L) Loading facilities. Loading facilities shall be on the side of rear yards. When adjacent to and/or visible
from any public street, the facilities must be adequately screened.
(M) Storage. For the purpose of this zoning district, car, vans and pickup trucks parked outside and
used by employees and/or visitors in the normal course of the business operation will not be construed to
343 1 Page
be outdoor storage. Further, outside parked trucks and semi -trailers used in the normal business
commerce will not be construed to be outdoor storage:
(1) Provided that the total number of trucks and semi -trailers does not exceed the number of docks
and/or bay doors; and
(2) This use is not construed as an operation listed as a conditional use in any industrial zone.
(N)Permitted uses. See Table 156-A.1.
(1) Uses not explicitly enumerated in this section as permitted uses, but closely similar thereto as
determined by the Planning and Zoning Commission, provided these uses are not explicitly
mentioned as permitted or conditional uses elsewhere in this Chapter.
(0) Conditional uses. See Table 156-A.1.
(P) Industrial exterior building materials. Industrial buildings are required to be constructed of brick,
decorative block or approved textured masonry product. Pole barn type buildings are not allowed.
Buildings are required to have contrasting architectural features and must be designed to be aesthetically
pleasing.
Cross-reference:
Signs, see Chapter 152
Adult business licensing, see Chapter 110
Ord. 2d, #40. Amended 12/22/2010, Ord. 2d #58 amended 10/10/2012
§§ 156.041 THROUGH 156.049 RESERVED FOR FUTURE USE.
§ 156.050 PUBLICANSTITUTIONAL DISTRICT (P-1).
(A)Purpose. It is intended that the P-1 District provide opportunities for government facilities, schools,
churches, hospitals, libraries and other similar public and institutional uses.
(B) Permitted uses.
(1) Government buildings, structures, facilities, utilities, rights-of-way, easements, parks, open
spaces and vacant land; and
(2) Schools, churches, cultural and educational facilities and uses, libraries, hospitals and health
facilities.
Ord. 2d #58, amended 10/10/2012
344 1 Page
RELEVANT LINKS:
League of Minnesota Cities Information Memo: 1/20/2015
Zoning Guide for Cities Page 34
Care should be taken so that the 60 -Day Rule discussed previously is not
violated, resulting in an automatic granting of the rezoning.
Sun Oil Co. v. Village of New
Rezoning is a legislative act and needs only to be reasonable and have some
Hope, Minn. N.W.2d 256
(Minn. 1974).
rational basis relating to public health, safety, morals, or general welfare. A
rezoning decision must be supported by findings of fact that indicate the
city's rational basis for the rezone. If the city has followed a comprehensive
planning process, the findings of fact should also indicate that the decision is
consistent with the city's comprehensive plan.
(1) Rezoning residential property
Minn. Stat. 0 462.357, subd.
When property is rezoned from residential to commercial or industrial, a
2.
two-thirds majority of all members of the city council is required. (This
means there must be four affirmative votes on a five -member council, in
most cases.) For other rezoning decisions, a simple majority vote of all
members is all that is required.
A.G. Op. 59-A-32 (Jan. 25,
The Minnesota attorney general has issued an opinion that charter cities may
2002).
not alter this voting requirement in their charter. The purpose of state law is
to provide a uniform set of procedures for city planning and such procedures
apply to all cities, charter or statutory.
(2) Spot zoning
Amcon Corp. ,.. Cin- of
The general rule is that property owners to do not acquire any vested rights
Eagan, 348 N.W.2d 66
(Minn. 1984).
in the specific zoning of their parcel. Cities may exercise their legislative
Olsen v. Cit o/ Hopkins, 178
discretion to rezone property in furtherance of the public, health, safety and
N.W.2d 719 (Minn. 1970).
Three Putt, LLC v. City of
welfare. Cities should, however, avoid a type of rezoning known as "spot
Minnetonka, No. A08-1436
(Minn. Ct. App 2009)
zoning."
(unpublished decision).
Spot zoning usually involves the rezoning of a small parcel of land in a
manner that:
State, by Rochester Assn of
• Is unsupported by any rational basis relating to promoting public
Neighborhoods v. Ciry o/
Rochester. 268 N.W.2d 885
welfare.
(Minn. 1978).
• Establishes a use classification inconsistent with surrounding uses and
creates an island of nonconforming use within a larger zoned district (for
example one lot where industrial uses are permitted in an otherwise
residential zone).
• Dramatically reduces the value for uses specified in the zoning ordinance
of either the rezoned plot or abutting property.
Alexander v. Cin of
Spot zoning that results in a total destruction or substantial diminution of
Minneapolis, 125 N.W.2d
583 (Minn. 1963).
value of property may be considered a form of regulatory taking of private
property without compensation.
League of Minnesota Cities Information Memo: 1/20/2015
Zoning Guide for Cities Page 34
RELEVANT LINKS:
See Handbook, Chapter 16
for more information on
environmental review.
Minn. Stat. § I I6D.
Minn. R. ch. 4410.
Minn. Stat. § 16D.02.
Minn. Stat. § 15.99, subd.
3(d), (e).
Minn. Stat. § 1161).
Minn. R. ch. 4410.
See Section V-A The 60 -Day
Rule.
Minn. Stat. § 462.353, subd.
4(a).
Minn. Stat. § 462.353, subd.
4(b).
Minn. Stat. § 462.353, subd.
4(d).
Minn. Stat. § 462.361.Minn.
Siai. §462.36..
Minn. Stat. § 462.353, subd.
4(a).
In these rare instances, a property owner may be entitled to compensation
for damages related to a legislative rezoning.
D. Environmental review
Minnesota has adopted a comprehensive and detailed environmental review
program to determine the significant environmental effects of private and
governmental actions. The idea behind the program is that if governmental
bodies require documents that identify the environmental consequences of a
proposed development and those documents are available to the public,
decision -makers can incorporate environmental protection into the proposed
development. The law prohibits the issuance of permits or development
prior to completion of necessary documents.
The state -mandated environmental review process usually occurs in
conjunction with the city's administration of its zoning ordinance. The
environmental review process may require the city to delay consideration of
an application. The 60 -Day Rule allows an extension for these purposes.
E. Fees and escrow
Proper zoning administration may require significant financial commitment
from a city. However, a city may establish land use fees under the Municipal
Planning Act sufficient to defray the costs incurred by the city in reviewing,
investigating, and administering an application for an amendment to an
official control, or an application for a permit or other approval required
under the zoning ordinance.
Fees are required by law to be fair, reasonable, proportionate, and be linked
to the actual cost of the service for which the fee is imposed. All cities are
required to adopt management and accounting procedures to ensure fees are
maintained and used only for the purpose for which they are collected. Upon
request, a city must explain the basis of its fees.
If a dispute arises over a specific fee imposed by a city related to a specific
application, the person aggrieved by the fee may appeal to district court
provided the appeal is brought within 60 days after approval of the
application and deposit of the fee into escrow. An approved application may
proceed as if the fee had been paid, pending a decision on the appeal.
Generally, cities must adopt fees by ordinance. However, there is a statutory
exception to this general requirement. The exception authorizes cities that
collect an annual cumulative total of $5,000 or less of land use fees to
simply refer to a fee schedule in the ordinance that governs the official
control or permit. These cities are authorized to adopt a fee schedule by
ordinance or by resolution, either annually or more frequently, after
providing notice and holding a public hearing.
League of Minnesota Cities Information Memo: 1/20/2015
Zoning Guide for Cities Page 35
Background
City of Centerville
2030 Comprehensive Plan
Zonina Districts
The Metropolitan Council requires that the Comprehensive Plan provide a brief
description of the existing zoning districts including allowable densities, intensity of use
and lot sizes. Consistent with State law, some of these zoning districts may need to be
updated after the Comprehensive Plan is officially adopted by the Centerville City
Council. These changes are described in more detail in the Implementation Chapter.
The official zoning controls can be found in Chapter 154 of the City Code.
Rural Residential District (R-1)
This district allows single-family detached housing at densities of not more than one unit
per ten acres. Other allowable uses include residential accessory uses, agricultural
production, produce stands and the keeping of some limited livestock.
High -Density Single Family Residential District (R -2A)
This district is intended to provide for higher -density single family units in detached,
attached and multi -family dwelling types where public utilities are available. Apartments
and condominiums are not to exceed 12 units per acre. Minimum lot size in this district
is '/< acre.
Single -Family Residential District (R-2)
This district is intended to provide for low density, traditional single-family detached
residences in areas where public utilities are available. This district also allows single-
family attached dwellings with two units. Minimum lot size in this district is 15,000
square feet.
Single -Family Manufactured Housing District (R-4)
This district is intended to provide for single-family attached and detached housing
including manufactured housing in areas where public utilities are available. Special
requirements apply to the establishment of a manufactured home within the City. The
minimum lot area for this district is 7,500 square feet.
Single -Family Residential - Estate District (R-5)
This district is intended to provide low density single-family detached housing. Attached
units are not allowed in this district. Minimum lot area in this district is 17,500 square
feet.
Commercial District (B-1)
This district is intended to provide opportunities for retail and service businesses that
require larger development sites, highway visibility or highway access. Minimum lot size
for this district is 20,000 square feet and minimum building size is 1,000 square feet.
Industrial District (1-1)
This district is intended to provide opportunities for light manufacturing and industrial
uses trade businesses machine shops and other more extensive land uses. Minimum
lot size in this district is 1 acre. Minimum building size is 5,000 square feet.
otl
^^yc Wlb h LOW
V~ Ldl '
r
Gem—Be, w
..
_
ae
tfNenev
9r
CCn'�
pQs� -
W.
co RC 14 .
tcri,il(�
s
Existing Land Use
City of Centerville 2030 Comprehensive Plan
t3C.By u
eeW r.,rr �n.a.nw
ewrti.+y ■.ue.nir
'� MrWr.e wee
_
� wurw
/O►fto
L
OWBIRS"
Rpun 6
50G 0 500 1.OW Feet
�-
Gewge Y19Cn Lane
PNM Laaco
79tlS1
h
W3.n S.,eei C� PQ 1:.
S$Jf Y'C g
:entervillc
Existing Growth Management Plan
City of Centerville 2030 Comprehensive Plan A
pc"
LaeeMledue Dery M McYawnul
� eeen OenYh ReLdYVIN yy
COD%—the R
.. - Ca1AA
4'; FiEYt'eM+eV.it
cwy /N\
F- MOWvr •NY Ileww
ewi+arrw�
oven ww. p �
Figum 9
SW 0 SOC t,OCCFeet •�J
I
GeOWpe'AD" LMW
l
C2nteh��� I. AkE
enterzri!!e
Official Zoning Map
City of Centerville 2030 Comprehensive
Plan
cic" Lwnt
111 lue•L 11[WDEMTI•L
!]. WXOIE fAWIY lE WOEMTLI
Ila-XXw DEXEm aWalE nrEv EEli0lXlul
!t-:MOLEFY YWUE•CWEEDXWEWOVEVELW' T
MS-EIMCI[ l.YILY !E WOEXTUL - ESTATE
� ■t .IEOIEO USE
�! •EEOtlO U!I
-.1 •COYYEIICIAL
M" •MMLE: CdGX.Nll1C
FIWm 10
-
Bo aro
S00 0 500 1.000 Fee'
TABLE 156-A.1 District Allowed Uses 6/15/2015
m
ro 0
�^hro Q Q 4z; Q 0 �Ay� �A� Q I
Use Category and Use T A w^' wyro +yro ^yam w� w� �e
Agricultural Uses
Crop production and vegetable gardening P
Produce stands for products raised on the P
nremises
Tree nurseries and sod farms P
Horses, livestock and fowl, not exceeding a
density of one horse or livestock animal per P
acre or three fowl per acre
Group Living Uses
Nursing homes
C
Residential-Care for six or Fewer Persons
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
(Except Juvenile Sex Offender Treatment)
Residential-Care for Juvenile Sex Offender
C
Treatment for up to six persons.
Ke5lUenvai-t,are Tor seven inrougn SWUM—
Persons (Except Juvenile Sex Offender
Treatment) (Subject to conditions as are
C
necessary to protect the health and safety of
Family Day Care serving twelve or fewer
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
persons
Group Family Day Care serving 14 or fewer
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
persons
Licensed day care serving thirteen through
C
sixteen persons
Licensed day care serving seventeen or more
C
C
C
persons
Specialized Care Facility
C
C
C
Household Living Uses
Single -family detached dwellings at a density
P
not exceeding one home per ten acres
Single -family detached dwellings
P
P
P
P
Single -family attached dwellings with up to two
P
dwelling units per building
Single -family attached dwellings with up to
C
twelve dwelling units per acre
Single -family attached or detached dwellings
where in combination with multi-family
PUD
dwellings on the development property meet
the district density goal
Manufactured housing development, park, or
PUD
cooperative
156.019
Multifamily projects
PUD
PUD
PUD
Public parks and recreation uses
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
Residential accessory uses as further reguated
P
P
P
P
P
P
in this chapter
156.107
Home Occupations
P
P
P
P
P
P
156.102
Commercial Uses
Accessory Buildings
P
P
156.040 (H), 156.107
Adult and Sexually oriented businesses as
C
further regulated in this code
110.01-110.99
Veterinary Clinic
C
90.01-90.09
Pet Shop
C
C
90.01-90.09
Kennel
C
90.01-90.09
TABLE 156-A.1 District Allowed Uses
Use Category and Use Type
811512015
to 4
Qo hto Q7 yto F
w
�
o 0 0
F yro Q- ht0 m roto-
d
o w ry O CC c°
km��
yo• yo• yo• Q' roto' P Q�
Automobile and motorized equipment sales
C
Barber/beauty salons
P
PUD
PUD
Commercial Uses
Building Supply sales and storage yards
C
Business and Professional Offices
P
P
PUD
PUD
Carwashes
P
Commercial schools
P
Commercial recreation
P
C
PUD
PUD
Construction trade offices and yards
P
Day care -see Group Living Uses
Day care facility
C C
C
C C P
C
C
Eating and drinking establishments
P
PUD
PUD
Farm Implement sales and service
C
Financial institutions
P
PUD
PUD
Fuel sales
P
C
Funeral homes and mortuaries
C
Hospitals
C
Hotels and motels
P
PUD
Liquor stores
P
PUD
PUD
Medical Clinic
P
PUD
PUD
Machine and repair shops-inside building only
C
P
Personal and professional business offices
P
P
PUD
PUD
Public buildings
C
C C
C
C C P
P
PUD
P
Public utility buildings and structures
C
C C
C
C C P
P
P
Theatres and recreational businesses
conducted with n structures,
P
PUD
Retail sales and service, but excluding adult-
oriented businesses
P
PUD
PUD
Industrial Uses
Indoor Shooting/Archery Range
P
Machine and repair shops
P
Manufacturing, processing, assembly except
recycling and waste
C
Mini-Storage
C
Research Facility, excluding animal or livestock
P
Recycling and Waste Processing entirely within
the principle structure
C
Truck Terminal
C
Warehouse/Distribution
P
CODES
L ]include
"1 These references
are for guidance only
and are not intended to
all applicable
sections of the code.
Interim Use I
Permitted Use P
Conditional Use C
Planned Unit Development PUD
—
TABLE 156-A.1 District Allowed Uses
Use Category and Use T e
8/1612015
ro
w O
Q y`°
4
^' O
Q ye
ryP
yrO
0
Q' y`O
0
� yrO
0
47jQ'
w
o
`�
w
y`°
ry
y`°
w
..Ip
Cjo
�0
Reference:
Procedures for Site Plan Review
Xrx
156.108
Procedures for Conditional Use Permits
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
156.320
Procedures for Planned Unit Developments
X
X
X
X
156.200
Procedures for Variances
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
156.310
Landscape and Tree Planing Requirements
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
156.167, 156.168
Fences
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
BuildingHeight Limits
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
156.121
Yards
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
156.122
Setbacks
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X A
endix A. Table 1
Parking Requirements
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
156.166
Other Standards
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
156.144
Outside Stora e
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
156.144, M
Shoreland Requirements
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
156.133
Teresa Bender
From: Mike Ericson
Sent: Thursday, June 01, 2017 10:32 AM
To: Teresa Bender; Paul Palzer; Dan Schmitz
Subject: FW: Follow Up to Meetings Regarding XXXX 20Th Street South Centerville, MN
Attachments: Coliers Brochure.pdf, NWL Inventory.pdf; CENTER VILLA AREA EXHIBIT.pdf, CENTER
VILLA SECOND ADDTION (10-7-14).pdf, Site Plan Sketch2 Lrg.pdf, Wetland Delineation
Report.pdf, Easement Agreement for Common Driveway.doc; MapPrint.pdf; Blaine
Project Pics.pdf, Inver Grove Hights Project Pics.pdf, Wiconia Project Pictures.pdf
Teresa
Please add to the P & Z agenda too....
Thanks...
Mike
From: Raymond Pruban [mailto:raypruban@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 01, 2017 9:30 AM
To: Mike Ericson <MEricson @CENTERVILLEMN.com>; Charles Roberts <CRoberts@CENTERVILLEMN.com>
Cc: Dhawkins1947@aol.com; Robert Johnson <rdjarchitect@gmail.com>; Shawn Bohan <sbohan@rls-aec.com>; Mike
Brass <mike@mikebrass.com>; Samantha Berger <sberger@ricecreek.org>; Patrick Hughes <phughes@ricecreek.org>;
Thomas Havron <tbhavron@gmail.com>; Joe Benson <joebenson@edinarealty.com>
Subject: Follow Up to Meetings Regarding XXXX 20Th Street South Centerville, MN
Hi Mike & Charles,
Thank you for meeting with us yesterday. I must say it was very refreshing to meet with
a City that is open for business. I know that does not mean anything is a given for this
project, but it is always much better to work with folks who actually want the business
versus those who don't or who don't care. Thank you again for that.
As we spoke about we feel the storage units are a great buffer and will be a very good
neighbor to the residential neighbors because the storage units are about as low traffic,
low noise and low impact you could possibly hope for. If that site were a B-1 business
use, who knows what could end up being there and there is really nothing the neighbors
could do to stop it. For example, a quick review of the B-1 zoning code allows things like
automobile and motorized equipment sales and service, car washes, eating and drinking
establishments, fuel sales, liquor stores, retail sales and service, etc all of which could
be much worse in terms of the residential neighbors. Imagine a restaurant with drunk
people at 1:OOAM or loud music from the outdoor patio or a liquor store, there is no
question the storage units is a great use for the property. We understand of course that
the zoning would need to be changed and we are hopeful the Planning Commission and
1
Council will have the wisdom to see the decision would be a good one for the impacted
residents.
Along the back, there would be fencing (actually all four sides get fenced) and
landscaping along the property line in the rear to help with the transition. Once the units
are built and filled, the developer, Don Hawkins experience in doing this over many
years is you will see only one or two cars a day to the facility. The facility is typically
open from 5:30AM to 10:OOPM. He says opening early is pretty important because
sometimes contractors will store stuff they will want to get before heading to a job in the
morning. With the buildings running the direction shown on the sketch I provided, the
neighbors would only even see someone when someone on the rear units are there,
otherwise they wouldn't even know someone is there.
On the building timeline it is worth noting the vertical construction will go relatively fast
as the developer, Don Hawkins builds some the masonry components off site and
assembles in somewhat a modular way. Don says the actual vertical construction only
takes about 7-10 days per building.
As agreed, attached are the pdf files of the hand outs from yesterdays meeting. I believe
the architect Robert Johnson agreed to prepare a site plan today or tomorrow instead of
using the one I had. I did attach my sketch as a back up but I am sure the one the
architect will provide will look much different as my sketch was simply for discussion
purposes only.
We met with the Watershed yesterday after out meeting and learned that there was still
an open permit relating to the development that happened to the west in 1998.
Apparently there was some work to be done to Outlot A to fill the larger wetland but that
was never done. I guess the seller got sick and has had serious health issues that may
have prevented him from completing this. Also, we learned the Watershed has a flood
plain of 900.8+/- (that is not great). All this to say we really don't know a whole lot
more then before we met with them, but the Watershed is going to look into the history
of permits, etc. Mike Brass expressed that there was a planning commission meeting
coming up this Tuesday and if it was possible to get feedback by then it would be great.
Hi Samantha & Patrick,
Thank you for our meeting yesterday too. As mentioned above, we learned a little about
the site but hopefully more to follow. It is good to know there is no buffer requirement
from wetlands that Rice Creek specifically requires. It was also good to learn a little
about the history of the site, etc. Once you learn more, please go ahead and contact
Doan Hawkins and email Shawn Bohan and/or Robert Johnson.
I think that is it. Please keep in mind, I know some of you know me based on my
development background but I am not the developer in this project, it is Don Hawkins.
Our real estate company, Amaris Company is representing the buyer Don Hawkins only
and I was simply trying to help him get things rolling. Please direct your questions and
such going forward to Don Hawkins or his team. I've learned Don is not much of an
email guy, so I'd suggest the good of telephone if possible. Of course, we are here to
support the process in any way we can.
i
Thanks Everyone.
Sincerely,
Raymond Pruban
651-248-3631
Amaris Homes, LLC
Amaris Custom Homes build affordable, custom-built, green -homes ... with healthy living
built in.
We work primarily on a referral basis. If you know of anyone thinking about building new, please consider recommending
us.
[CONFIDENTIALITY AND PRIVACY NOTICE]
Information transmitted by this email is proprietary and is intended for use only by the individual or entity to which it is addressed, and may contain information that is private,
privileged, confidential or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient or it appears that this mail has been forwarded to you without proper
authority, you are notified that any use or dissemination of this information in any manner is strictly prohibited. In such cases, please delete this mail from your records.
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please visit http://www.spnanteccloud.com
M Gmail
Raymond Pruban <raypruban@gmail.com>
City of Centerville & Watershed Meeting Confirmation
Raymond Pruban <raypruban@gmail.com> Thu, May 25, 2017 at 3:30 PM
To: Robert Johnson <rdjarchitect@gmail.com>, Shawn Bohan <sbohan@rls-aec.com>, Mike Brass
<mike@mikebrass.com>, Dhawkins1947@aol.com, Eli Rupnow <eli.rupnow@amiengineers.com>
Hello Everyone:
To confirm we are meeting next Wednesday at 10:OOAM with the City of Centerville at the City offices.
I believe we are meeting with Mike Ericson the City Administrator (mericson@centervillemn.com. Address
is 1880 Main Street, Centerville, MN
Immediately after that meeting we are heading over to Rice Creek Watershed at 4325 Pheasant Ridge
Drive NE #611, Blaine MN 55449. Eli, can you please confirm who we are meeting with in the event
you don't make the meeting.
FYI: Eli has a baby coming and may not be able to attend.
The key questions I See at this time:
1 - B-1 versus I-1 zoning. What is the property currently zoned for? Would they consider rezoning to I-1
or conditional use permit for this use?
2 - How does the staff feel about the storage units as a use for this property?
3 - Flood Plain and what is the current flood plain elevation level and what do the buildings need to set
be at? What work was done with FEMA?
4 - Confirm sprinklers would NOT be required. Is there a building size limit where that kicks in?
5 - Concept planning commission meeting, when is the next opportunity and when do they need
documents to go out in packets?
6 - Confirm required setbacks and other conditions that might affect property
7 - Ability to fill wetland #3 under "original RCWD permit". Is that still in affect with a new permit? What
were the conditions for that, if any?
Let me know if you need anything more.
This is my official hand off to Don's team.
Sincerely,
Raymond Pruban
651-248-3631
Amaris Homes, LLC
Amaris Custom Homes build affordable, custom-built, green -homes... with healthy living built in.
We work primarily on a referral basis. If you know of anyone thinking about building new, please consider recommending
us.
[CONFIDENTIALITY AND PRIVACY NOTICE]
Information transmitted by this email is proprietary and is intended for use only by the individual or entity to which it is addressed, and may contain
information that is private, privileged, confidential or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient or it appears that
this mail has been forwarded to you without proper authority, you are notified that any use or dissemination of this information in any manner is strictly
prohibited. In such cases, please delete this mail from your records.
Jacobson Environmental, P ILC www.jacobsonem
Environmental Consultants Wayne Jacobson,
5821 Humboldt Avenue North, Broo
Email: jacobsonenv@msn.com
October 14, 2014
Sherry & Will Lessard
2303 Tart Lake Road
Lino Lakes. MN 55038
RE: Project Name:
6995 20`'
Comm. No.:
2014-204
Project Location:
City of Ci
T31 N, R2
Project Description:
Wetland I
Dear Will:
As discussed, Jacobson Environmental, P
official wetland delineation in accordance �
Delineation Manual and the 2012 Regiona
Northcentral and Northeast Region.
yn Center, MN 55430
Ave S Delineation
nterville
W, Section 23
lelineation Report
ronment I.com
'.S.S., W.P.C., P.W.S., A.F.S.
-------------I------------------------
I(612) 802-6619 Cell
LC. (JE) visited the above eferenced site to perform an
ith the 1987 U.S. Army Coi ps of Engineers Wetland
Supplement to the Corps c f Izngineersj Wetland Delineation:
Adjacent site land use includes residential lots, farmland, woodlands,
combination of a boat repair facility, woodland, and wetlands west of 2
Avenue South in Centerville, Minnesota. F gure 5 is the Wetland Delin
location map of the property. All figures referenced by this report are
The purpose of this study was to investigate the project area, identify
for wetlands, delineate the jurisdictional extent of the wetland basins a
Woodland Species Noted
Trees
Cottonwood
Quaking Aspen
Red Maple
Basswood
Green Ash
Box Elder
Shrubs
Green Ash
Quaking Aspen
Tartarian Honeysuckle
Common Buckthorn
Herbs
Common Plantain
Kentucky Bluegrass
Tall Goldenrod
Common Dandelion
Ground Ivy
Common Milkweed
Red Raspberry
Smooth Brome
Canarygrass
,ck Sedge
Sedge
ng Nettle
tive Fern
leaved Tearthumb
wetland. This site is a
Avenue South at 6995 20th
ion Map.' Figure 1 is a site
rented al the end of the text.
as meeting the technical criteria
classify tie wetland habitat.
The growing season for this site is approxir iately from 4/15 to 10/15 where the air temperature averages
above 28 degrees F. The growing season n 2014 started in April. Thi3 site is in tlfie Anoka Sandplain
subsection ecoregion according to Minnesota DNR and the annual precipitation av rages 30.92 inches.
The presettlement vegetation was oak woo land and brushland in this area.
Wetland Delineation -Mitigation -Permitting- onitoring-Biinking-Functio all Analysis -T & E Surveys 1
Phase I Environmental Assessments-EAW's Soil ID -Soil Analysis & Delir estion-Environmental Referrals
Pond & Lake Weed Control & Fish Stocking Tree Surveys -Natural Reso rhe Management Plans
Jacobson Environmental,
Environmental Consultants
5821 Humboldt Avenue North,
Email: jacobsonenv@msn.com
The precipitation for the previous three
worksheet data was as follows:
Aug July
Worksheet (Wks) 4.89' 2.15
30% less than 2.94 2.90
30% more than 4.74 4.73
www.jacobsonem
Wayne Jacobson,
-------------------------
i Center, MN 55430
along with the compai
ne
1 .55 " NWS Data
W,
►e
nonmen Isom
',S.S., W. C., P.W.S., A.F.S.
----------- ------------------------
;(612) 802-6619 Cell
of the 0/23/14 precipitation
2014 Wks Interpret Wet DryA3)et
Multi -month score (3`3) + (2'1) + = 14 Normal (10 to 14 b ing normal)
The delineation was performed on Septen
period affected the boundary of any wetlai
the methodology as presented in Appendi
delineation was performed and reported b
#30611, Society of Wetland Scientists — P
BWSR Wetland Delineator, Certified #101
#A-171.
Methodology
)er 23, 201L and it is unlik
is in this delineation, sino
A. Precipitation data is Ic
Wayne Jacobson, Minne:
)fessional Wetland Scient
, American Fisheries Soci
The wetlands on the subject property wero delineated using the routin
forth in the 1987 U.S. Army Corps of Engir eers Wetlands Delineation
determined through a routine analysis of tl a vegetation, soils and hyd
characteristics in order for an area to bedelineated as a wetland. We
or inundated with surface and or groundwE ter at a frequency and dura
under normal circumstances do support, a prevalence of vegetation ty
conditions. Examples of wetlands includeeasonally flooded basins,
shallow and deep marshes, shrub swamp wooded swamps, fens, ar
Vegetation
ly the precipitation totals in this
the period
as normal according to
ated in Appendix
A. This wetland
)ta Professional
Soil Scientist
t *1000, Ur
iversity of Minnesota /
ty — Associate
Fisheries Scientist
determine ion methodology set
lanual. W tland boundaries were
Ipgy whit must all show wetland
Inds are a eas that are saturated
:ilt sufficie t to support, and that
dally adap ed for life in hydric soil
)Odplain fo ests, wet meadows,
bogs.
The plant species within the parcel were ctalogued and assigned a w§tlrand indictor status according to
Lichvar, R.W., Butterwick, N.C. Melvin, anl W.N Kirchner, 2014. The National W�t/and Plant List: 2014
Update of Wetland Ratings. Phytoneuron 014-41: 1-4.2.
In the text of this report and on the enclos d data forms, the plant indi ator status follows the plant's
scientific name unless a status has not beon assigned. The hydrophyt c plant crit rion is met when more
than 50 percent of the dominant species b the 50/20 rule for each str tum (herb, hrub/sapling tree, and
woody vine) were assigned an obligate (OL)', facultative wet (FACW , and/or facultative (FAC) wetland
status.
' OBL=Obligate Wetland, occurs an estimated
67%-99% probability of occurrence in wetland
wetlands, 34%-66% probability. FACU=Facul
probability. UPI..=Upland, almost never occurs
information available to determine an indicator
toward higher (+) or lower (-) frequency of occ
Wetland Delineation -Mitigation -Permitting -
Phase I Environmental Assessments-EAW's
Pond & Lake Weed Control & Fish Stockinc
9% in wetlands. FACW=Fa<
FAC=Facultative, is equall
ttive Upland, occurs in weth
n wetlands, <1% probability
;tatus. Positive or negative s
rrence with an category.
lonitoring-Banking-Functic
Soil ID -Soil Analysis & Del
Tree Surveys -Natural Res
Itative WellInd'
has an estimated
likely to oc r in wetlands and non -
Js only occa ionally, 1%-23%
41= No Indi lator, insufficient
n previously indicated a frequency
ali Ana lysis -T& E Surveys 2
e�tion-Envi onmental Referrals
irge Management Plans
Jacobson Environmental, PLC www.jacobsonen inonmen l.com
Environmental Consultants Wayne Jacobson, P,S.S., W. .C., P.W.S., A.F.S.
5821 Humboldt Avenue North, Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 1(612) 802-6619 Cell
Email: jacobsonenv@msn.com
With the 50/20 rule, dominants are generE Ily measured by absolute °/ cover in each stratum which
individually or collectively account for mora than 50% of total vegetati a cover in the stratum, plus any
other species which itself accounts for at I ast 20% of the total vegeta iue cover.
Soils
A hydric soil is a soil formed under conditi ns of saturation, flooding, or ponding long enough during the
growing season to develop anaerobic con itions in the upper part. If soil exhibi the indicators of a
hydric soil or is identified as a hydric soil t e hydric soil criterion is me .
The break between hydric and non -hydric soils was determined by ex
crossing the wetland/upland eco -tone and evaluating the soil colors, t
of redoximorphic indicators (i.e., mottles, c ley or oxidized rhizosphere
Midwest Region were noted as presented in the National Technical C
Indicators of Hydric Soils in the United States version 7.0 (USDA NR(
point. Also, upper soil profiles were comp red to the mapped or inclu
sample area for soil identification purpose $.
There are hydric soils with morphologies t
or red parent material; soils with high pH;
developed hydric soils, and soils high in in
assist in the identification of hydric soils in
hydric soil, the lack of an indicator does n(
developed mostly to identify the boundary
Not all of the obviously wetter hydric soils
most likely to occur in soils that cycle betA
at are difficult to interpret.
oils high or low in content
n inputs. In some cases v
:hese situations. As long
i preclude the soil from be
)f hydric soil areas and ge
gill be identified by the indi
yen anaerobic (reduced) a
Morphological features of hydric soils indic to that saturation and ana(
under either contemporary or former hydrologic regimes. Where soil r
the landscape, vegetation, or observable h drology, it may be necess,
experienced soil or wetland scientist to det rmine whether the soil is h
To clarify on some Anoka County sites,
1. Many of these soils have black or
2. Many of the soils have a high orgy
3. The hydric soil margin is typically
4. Not all of the obviously wetter soil
5. Many of the hydric soils are Mollis
Wetland Classification
lray parent materials
iic matter content
igher than the wetland bou
will be ident fied by the ind
Is which are classic proble
Wetland classifications discussed in the to t are set forth in Wetlands
United States (FWS/OBS Publication 79/31, Cowardin et al. 1979) an
(USFWS Circular 39, Shaw and Fredine, 1 71.) Additionally, plant co
and Reed (1998) are given.
Wetland Delineation -Mitigation -Permitting- onitoring-Ban king- Functio
Phase I Environmental Assessments-EAW's Soil ID -Soil Analysis & Deli
Pond & Lake Weed Control & Fish Stocking Tree Surveys -Natural Resc
vating soi pits along transects
lures, and presence or absence
Hydric Soil Indicators for the
imittee for Hydric Soils Field
2010) if present at each sample
Nnary soil Series found in the
'hese inclu a soils with black, gray,
organic matter, recently
do not cur ently have indicators to
the soil meets the definition of a
3 hydric. Tie indicators were
orally work est on the margins.
itors. Red ximorphic features are
J aerobic (c xidized) conditions.
rabic conditions have existed
orphology eems inconsistent with
ry to obtain the assistance of an
,dric.
i
ary margin on the site
Mors
hydric soil in many cases
nil Deeiowe ter Habitats of the
Wetlands c f the United States
munity typ s as named by Eggers
ialysis- & E Surveys 3
m-Envi onmental Referrals
Manaq ment Plans
Jacobson Environmental, PLC www.jacobsonem
Environmental Consultants I Wayne Jacobson,
------------------------------------------ ----------------------------
5821 Humboldt Avenue North, Brooklyn Center, MN 55430
Email: jacobsonenv@msn.com
Topographic maps, National Wetlands In*ntory maps the Web Soil
DNR Protected Waters maps were consulted to locate potential wetl;
The Routine On-site Determination Methop was used on this site. In
procedures were used:
1) The vegetative communit was sampled in all presen
whether 50% of the domiriant plant species were hyd
2) Soil pits were dug using al dutch auger to depths of 1
hydric soil characteristics.
3) Signs of wetland hydrolog� were noted and were
to shallow water table an depth of soil saturation
+onmen I.com
S.S., W. .C., P.W.S., A.F.S.
----------t------------------------
(612) 802-6619 Cell
arvey, Aerial Photographs, and
J habitats.'.
is method,j the following
strata to d termine
)phytic using the 50/20 method
'40", notin soil profiles and any
red to field criteria such as depth
in the soil pits.
Wetland edges were marked with orangeumbered
pin flags. 4 -foot
ood lath m rked with orange
"wetland boundary" flagging tape or flaggi
g tied on vegetation may b
Used if site, conditions warrant.
Any wetlands were mapped using modern
survey methods by others.
At least on sample point transect
crosses each delineated wetland edge. T
ese transects consist of an
upland sa ple point, and a
wetland sample point. Other sample point
may be located in areas
high have one or more of the
wetland vegetation, soils, or hydrologic ch
racteristics present, or where
questionble conditions exist.
Sample points are marked with orange pin
flags with a oink ribbon tied
on them. ample data sheets are
found in Appendix B.
Results
Pond 1
Pond 1 is a PEMCd Type 3 exempt ditche shallow marsh comprised
canarygrass, 10% water smartweed, and % sandbar willow along wit
boundary was typically a transition from tal goldenrod to reed canaryc
soils changed from dry fill soil to saturated Glencoe soil in the wetland
wetland, and hydrology disappeared in the upland.
Basin 2
Basin 2 is a PEMBd Type 2 ditched wet m adow comprised of 60% r
sedge, 10% sandbar willow as shrubs, 2Q° field horsetail, 5% red os
narrowleaf cattail along with a few other sp cies. The wetland bound
tall goldenrod to reed canarygrass with a t pographic break. The soil
saturated Webster soil in the wetland. Soil aturation was present in t
disappeared in the upland.
Basin 3
Basin 3 is a PEM/SS1 Bd ditched Type 2/6 lexempt wet meadow/shrub
canarygrass, 10% field horsetail, 10% gian goldenrod, 3% redtop, 100,
sandbar willow as shrubs, 5% red osier dogwood as shrubs, and 2% tL
other species. The wetland boundary was ypically a transition from to
with a topographic break. The soils changed from dry fi I soil to satural
Soil saturation was present in the wetland, bnd hydrology disappeared
Wetland Delineation -Mitigation -Permitting- onitoring-Banking-Fur
Phase I Environmental Assessments-EAW's Soil ID -Soil Analysis &
Pond & Lake Weed Control & Fish Stocking Tree Survey3-Natural
f i60% nam wleaf cattail, 20% reed
a few oth r species. The wetland
ass with a opographic break. The
Soil satura ion was present in the
i
,d canarygr ss, 10% tussock
r dogwood ;s shrubs and 2%
y was typi Ily a transition from
changed frrim dry Webster soil to
B wetland, frim
hydrology
Kamp co prised of 700/6 reed
aottonwoo as trees, 60%
sock sedg along with a few
goldenrod to reed canarygrass
d Webster soil in the wetland.
i the upla d.
il,Analysis-T & E Surveys 4
ration -Environmental Referrals
rQe Management Plans
Jacobson Environmental, P
Environmental Consultants
------------------------------------------
5821 Humboldt Avenue North, Brool
Email: jacobsonenv@msn.com
Pond 4
www.jacoosonem
Wayne Jacobson,
----------------------
Center, MN 55430
nonment#l.com
,S.S., W. .C., P.W.S., A.F.S.
---------- ------------------------
1(612) 802-6619 Cell
Pond 4 is a PUBG Type 5 exempt pond c mprised of 65% open water, 20% nary wleaf cattail, and 10%
reed canarygrass along with a few otherspecies. The wetland boundary was typically a transition from
tall goldenrod to reed canarygrass with a topographic break. The soils changed ftom dry fill soil to
saturated Webster soil in the wetland. Soilsaturation was present int the wetland, nd hydrology
disappeared in the upland.
Basin 5
Basin 5 is a PEMC Type 3 shallow marsh comprised of 90% narrowle f cattail, 50reed canarygrass, 1%
lake sedge, and 1 % tussock sedge along with a few other species. The wetland oundary was typically a
transition from tall goldenrod to reed Cana grass with a topographic breek. The 4oils changed from dry
fill soil to saturated Webster soil in the wetland. Soil saturation was present in the etland, and hydrology
disappeared in the upland.
The National Wetland Inventory Map (NW ) (Figure 2) identifies Basins 3 and 4 al wetlands on the
subject site.
i
According to the DNR Protected Waters IV ap (PWI) (Figure 4) of Anoka County there are no public water
wetlands on the site. Figure 5 is the Wetla id Delineation Map of the site, and it shows the area delineated
for the project
Basin #3 on this project was declared exept from WCA according to permit status report dated 10-16-
98 enclosed in Appendix E. In
According to the Web Soil Survey (Figure ) the following hydric soils existed on tike parcel:
Webster
Glencoe
Cathro
Photographs were taken of the site and sorne are included in Appen
Confirmation of Jurisdictional Status
We are submitting this report to the client
type determination. We have enclosed an
form in Appendix D.
nd regulatory agencies to r(
)fficial Minnesota Interageni
Wetland Delineation -Mitigation -Permitting- onitoring-Banking-Functioi
Phase I Environmental Assessments-EAW's Soil ID -Soil Analysis & Delii
Pond & Lake Weed Control & Fish Stocking Tree Surveys -Natural Reso
C.
West a we�land boundary and
Water R source Application
ialysis- & E Surveys 5
in-Envi onmental Referrals
Manaa ment Plans
Jacobson Environmental, Pl
Environmental Consultants
-------------------------------------------
5821 Humboldt Avenue North, BrooN
Email: jacobsonenv@msn.com
Conclusion
Wayne Jacobson,
------------------------
Center, MN 55430
This wetland delineation meets the stand rds and crite,ia described it
Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual and the 2012 Regional Supple
Wetland Delineation: Northcentral and No theast Regicn. This was a
the results reflect the conditions present a the time of the delineation.
If any wetland impacts are planned for thin project, permits would be
cies.
Watershed District) and other agen
I certify that I performed the field analysisnd wrote the report for this
the opportunity to provide wetland service on this important project.
%a
i
inonmentol.com
P'S.S., W.O.C., P.W.S., A.F.S.
y 1(612) 802-6619 Cell
the 1987 U.S. Army Corps of
mient to the Corps of Engineers
�outine On ISite Determination and
from the LGU (Rice Creek
delineation. Thank you for
Wayne�E. JacobsonDate
Professional Soil Scien ist 430611
Professional Wetland Scientist #1000
Wetland Delineator, Certified #1019
Associate Fisheries Scientist #A-171
Jacobson Environmental, PLLC.
Regulators: Nick Tomczik, Rice Creek Watershed District
Andy Beaudet, USCOE
Dennis Rodacker, BWSR
Joan Spence, Anoka SW D
i
i
i
I
I
Wetland Delineation -Mitigation -Permitting- Monitoring -Ban king -Functio al Analysis & E Surveys
Phase I Environmental Assessments-EAW's Soil ID -Soil Analysis & Delineation -Environmental Referrals
Pond & Lake Weed Control & Fish Stocking Tree Surveys -Natural Reso r¢e Manag ment Plans
'....._.'s ...-t.�..=_... " -'1 7L
ust � ,.,,,n � '*+"�• fir,
t
t># m
Blacktop
40,424.03 SQ -FT
'=#f»iJ't�-' 40!4 411AW
MAR
�►Y'se�.y �, a _
Y*. ,yam.. �•`M,.Y,y�.--�_ _
•Y:1 ♦3
elk
i1 La
7P.,' r r
,i
21 G x 40
f
i
? nt rtes . t w
Fence
C.i r
168 s
314x40 310x40
10 t,
IL TSdrV IM-P #i' AL r 1� x.00
ei�es�r
VI yw(r4MY! �M.tb M.R t� ? � is ti X5'14 !R .iYa ,�7] 4iiil iC �d t � w
5mm iitq CI tht ait�"j. qt itte i#Ci V 4f i a q IEti�°it u
the S"/# at Sea 24 t X, 9 22.'--'
�
\ -� 'h
�t
�
'1
��I�i4
r
rrr+, _
`fir i
FIN
M ille, 0 � �
to 10014
`a~ _ wA•4"�t}ST.++'eY S '�t��'!t 54 A � r". ,t <
OMa
$meg
.�r
.v
AREA EIIHIBIT
—of— OLITLOT A AND B, CENTER VILLA
I�
---North line of the NE1/4 of the
i' SE1/4 of Sec. 23, T. 31, R. 22.
NB9'00'04"II
100
944.,27 N8.9"0000'
NORTH
-20
foot Drainage and Utility easement 50.88
to Doe. No. 1354081
50,66 —
S89-00
g2j°� - '04'E —r
according
N
/ t;696�.29 123.73
��
4
11
n
S>\T ni ojfp 3
* I
1510010 y m to
0•� °
W 3
N o 0
c c
/ I area north of trail centerline 1 �O °
y
J�O
O
0 a `
/ EXISTING BUILDING
75,557 sq. ft.
' Sp
Gj
°
N m
/ F.F.E. 902.49
_
1.73 acres _
TOWER l i _ 50
—
O
p, c
cc
N
°0�f
_
I m
0M
.:
y EXISTING BUILDING I'
a
F.F.E. 902.49
% Id'
w F3 U
I y
in
I a,
I
\ -Centerline 20 foot trail Easement I
00- 7 7
i -------L----------------
— —II L L
g
309.53 _
N 89'38'03' W
0
r — — — — — — — — — — — —
I
— — — — — .
— — — —I
00
I g LL.J
fgh>
� Q��•
Q
Z I
�� O
I
Q
L
!�
U
O
Cu o
N I
I N
O
%0
a I
v I
I
I IU
Cu
o I
W
I
I
° I
I
I
m
A n I
i — 50 — 50 —
yq
C4 a I area south of trail centerline I
:o
O a I 130,396 sq. ft.
�y
2.99 acres
'asaJ. I
:
O
Nt
° o
N
I
w
31 b
o
o
\ 40
\ I
al� a0 C
WVWj
y
i
N
SBB'S6
09"B 900.00
49.29
South line of the N1/2 of the NEI the of
100 .5' 8.5B'09"',d'
the SEI/4 of Sec. 23, T. 31, _22.
1
I
Location: Centerville, MN
Scale 1"= 60' 1 Drawn By. MMD
Project Manager: JER Job No.: 98335PP
o Denotes Iron Set 1 • Denotes Iron Found
Bearings shown are on an assumed
datum.
l hereby certify that this plan, survey or report was prepared by me or under my
"_M
direct supervision and that / am a duly Registered Land Surveyor under the laws
6_M
IL SONS-
INC.
of the State of Minnesota. Dated this 18th day of
✓ulv 2013.
°1"" Professional
Land Surveyors
6776 Lake Drive NE,
Suite 110
License No.
41578
Lino Lakes, MN 55014
TN.(651) 361.8400 1—(651)361.8701
PRELIMINARY PLAT
-of- CENTER VILLA SECOND ADDITION
-for- Lake Area Utilities
Sharon K. Lessard, President
2303 Tart Lake Road
Lino Lakes, MN 55038
I� NORTH
VICINITY MAP
PALET Cr SEC, 23 TAP. X 13116. a - _ wN , RRnf ` t yi-�. - @�,,.,•
_
T e6eM. -
�= m.r -..0 n _-'-'�'•.mN N.J�a ins- DrI'7.-e�-'e' �+-• s^ �w�--yam � - I �i$
o� x
7 AN
I_T I
LOT 1
x 5l I 8..557 •gyp '<
1eiS ! I
t>3 • .0 aG r
"msv
v ma
II>.-
I m.: I
ANOKA CCLN . 694-E50TA ru.N I F 1
INO SCALE)
s I
cc
Fc ,1
ga--------------
--ww
_ "-= -1
ZONING ANICKS a -
GDRR��T2DHwGlS B , SETBAD�,NER�A< •�• I .�. Ir :� _ � "•� }*��
vRaRosEO zaRxc IS a-1 cOEILERDAL a i■' M' ehr. �'e4A. �•. -14---- E{ 1
TRONT SERA. JO MEET — — — , Y. - .(��_ ��•\• n4 bE ,(
PEAR SERA. ]0 fEEi T )er �� •��{�� as (.spy �E
CMAGE SERA. s
YARDD RET �� pn{ eR.", py \ -�- bi iiois nW • I Ft I
SOE SERA. M EEE,
OEVEl—T REOVNENENTS FOR B-, ODNN AL ` ` • 1 - DKr m¢ a • �' �_ •� ,
MwxuMARE ADDDSE. ee .6*#t a ( DNRM.oDN� ••ex e.•�aL�_ m
N•AwN BLDTNIdNGT'SEE 1.000 SE a1«: Eer: ,� tlww,L Raw rtRMT "TM • ar. °�. 'R' i
A,err,. ex e I i I I I
qtr .s.yr/s. arrr,
--- -------
ES � e�I} •�` I v ,fin I
a avETEAN03 •%WAN•11�� { +
C 1 I I
@`I • 1
I I
ON
AREA COMPUTATIONS
T
;Des
rto.
TOTALASTE AREA 4 721 ACRES
�MCON9'f AREA 71 ACRES •EACRES
,
1-9
eoxN e1;,, � �v�eif• • •e � mr •i-•) I ;^
,
a
VF i
1e7� • . ��T" .-TLANtD2 K
—
°N"
NOTES ee.6�e1r„ I LEIENI
ENI, — � 0— by E G. Ree Se E Me °9/00/14. PROPEM NESCRIPTIIN . DEND E5 WON NDNDNEXT SET.FOUMAS LABELED
- B•vMOA Kwan en m AnxR County OOVxn. oho c IY Mn•M1a DENOTES Etpl N —11 SET. YON O LRAELS1 4tS)e
Oulbl A, CENTER NLLA. M 0 DENOTES AM.A COUNtt CAST IRON MONUMENT
- Cu0 Mesta w IrtM et ON Lep erre 0eU of wro. O DENOTES CAT. BASIN
TXN NE_Y v_ ga0>•e RIOwt VN 0•nMt el UW vwN AeeHbnM ORAMAGE AND VTNJW EASENENTS ME SNONN Ru5: O DENOTES S— SEMER NAxHOLL
•OMwm1 H��r••Vktlm• eb/w vIe.I10mvm moY _NEI etMr tlm MO•a 0 DENOTES SAMTMY SEVER MANHOLE
SwM; vjet v r•Nalm uRan .ac•NI el a errant IIW
- cE➢wnIAmiOtmwi_e IEalwnanllene'Ome00a0e.P5LOa gbion qXp - _ w w -p -R- AJMI APL O_N_NG s1R_EEq p0 DDDEEFNMNOOOOTTl�EEESSSs PTO]OKFEPARIVN,OPi
Y DALE
u
EnRM.p Maaa/z/zol.. GN . iOWSEYoEEXI—G N
DENDOSELREO
T ELEVA-
IENCIMARR rK
LOT"L
REAR LO! UXES, UN ESS O—SE SHOARI ON M5 %Ai FVLEEMICAL 901
YDE
• DENOTES MO ES OSOL B Y MME
m (BY —S)
= OENDTES STOEN SEVER A`—
B[NCNMMIt: MMOT GSID
5 / 02Ja0. R.•Ma❑ DENOTES NET LAND
5e
STATW NUE 02.42
FLEVAORI - 9Jt.4(NAN) N) —•—•— DENOTES rENCE AS NOTEp
^--' DENOTES E—O GOITOORS (2 TOOT wrzxvU)
E 6_ RII� SONS INC. y ew IlY waL uN Na..Y, an —DEN
I raeO tt- PW--1
ee SY a. or une4r RTES ENSIMO S1WM SERER
agwaNbn .b uet .D .--axoTEs oNEMIEAO MRE
o AII�RgN'vM time SarwM .— DENOTES UXE OEtINEATEO Br
°f 1" Professional land Surveyors =t= GRAPHIC SCALE COBSDN ENWONNEHTAL. MI:
NNN..MR.4.RwR 6776Lake Drive Lino Lakes MN 55614DENOTES
Suite 110 ���5>e �"�� —SSS RFAAIE
[. rcw nn T C1 DENOTES GRAVEL WRPAGE
1.41.(651)361.8200 F—(651)361-8701 oat«10/07/14 Lbn_x..1s7e II -. n
�v)�145B4w�T45e4RRn.0 SHEET 0l T
11 PP
Property Information
LOCATION:
6955 20th Avenue South
Centerville, MN
SALE PRICE:
$175,830 ($1.35 per square foot)
Gas, electric, water, sewer
available - stubbed on site
SURVEY: opre E Cedar SL
LAND AREA: Yes
2.99 acres (130,244 square feet)
OL t
PHASE I: 21 a iu
TRAFFIC COUNTS: Yes, completed in 1995
10,800 cars per day on County Road 14 COLLIERS INTERNATIONAL
43,000 cars per day on 1-35E 5985 Rice Creek Parkway, Suite 105
ACCESS:
Access to 1-35E via County Road 14 Shoreview, MN 55126
www.co[iiers.com
AREA UNIBIT
-of- OLITLOT A AND B, CENTER VILLA
SEIline of the NE114 of the
SEI
4 of Sec. 23, T. 31, R. 22.
Mroo '04-F
20foot accordi
according to Doc. No. ne and tn1354081
52 S89 -00'047E 7'
,6 6� 29 123.73 \ —s7j73.1
1gJ:p� f_
area north of trail centerline 1
EXISTING BUILDING 75,557 sq. ft.
F.F.E. 902.49
1.73
WEROCres
I
I N I
I p
I In
EXISTING BUILDING
F.F.E. 902.49
I � �
I b
I w
I o
I
20 foot trop Easement I
�--Centerline
L j — — —1
W N— �� 31N.53—Bj�(g CtillLLtl$ER12t1�_ _
N 893803 W
t�
I
i
N
�
I
I
I
I
40
«
I
I
I
�
I
I
v
I
I
o
W
�
I
I
�
I
.bE
I
I
I
I
I
I
I area south of trail centerline
I
130,396 sq. ft.
i
2.99 acres
♦ 11
I
I
I
♦rj 1
I
1
40
�
I
I I
I
31
M IA r
I
1
I
L --------------------j
I
moo.
N
A
N
the of o%hSec123 of the
3NE1f4��
Location: Centerville, MN
MIKE BRASS
952 837 3054 direct
612 750 4312 mobile
mike.brass@colliers.com
M99b0�
so.sts � ao.t
4 3 I
O g !? a
0,4p ao' Iz b
—50
Sp
0*
ZIZ
mob]10C
h�1
0
N p
IU
50 50
I
.7ati0 50.00
100
U.L4
N U
d
tU o
o%Q
to
NORTH
N Y 0
C C
C c
ami Q
W N 6
0 N
6,
1 r C
C�
o
� M
C
\�0
W
I.- L)
y0
Agreement between Adjoining Owners Creating Easement for Common Driveway
Agreement made on the _ day of March, 2015, between Lake Area Utility
Contract of 2303 Tart Lake Road, Lino Lakes, MN 55038, and Timothy McNamara of
(street address, city, county, state, zip code). Do we want site address or living address ?
Lake Area Utility and Timothy McNamara recite and declare as follows:
A. The parties have an interest in adjoining real estate situated in the City of
Centerville, County of Anoka, State of Minnesota, and described, respectively, as
follows:
Lot 1 Block 1 Center Villa, Anoka County, Minnesota to be referred to as Lot 1 and
Outlot A, Center Villa, Anoka County, Minnesota to referred to as Outlot A
B. The parties desire to create a common driveway between the above-
described adjoining lots owned by them for the benefit of each of them.
In consideration of the above recitals and the terms and covenants of this
agreement, the parties agree as follows:
1. Lot 1 will have access over the existing driveway on Outlot A per the
attached Exhibit A with access over entire Drive way hatched area as shown on Exhibit A
Future purchaser of Out lot A will have the right to move the drive way entrance to the
(24' Future Driveway Connection ) as shown on Exhibit A and then the width of the
driveway will reduced to the 60' by 223.88 rectangle shown on Exhibit A. The cost of
moving and or creating the new entry from 20th Avenue North will be paid for by the
owners of Out lot A, at their sole cost and expense
Maintenance for the Shared driveway will be born by the owners of Lot 1 until Outlot A
is sold and being used by Outlot A. Once Outlot A is using the shared driveway the
maintenance shall be shared evenly between Outlot A and Lot 1.
2. The easement created by this agreement is superior and paramount to the
rights of either of the parties to this agreement in the respective servient estates so
created, and the parties further agree that it is a covenant that shall run with the land,
unless agreed by both parties to change the easement.
WITNESS our signatures as of the day of 920
Signed and acknowledged
in the presence of:
STATE OF
COUNTY
Personally appeared before me, a Notary Public in and for said State,
and , who acknowledged the
signing of the foregoing instrument to be the voluntary act and deed of each of them for
the uses and purposes herein set forth.
IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my
notarial seal this day of 20
Commission expiration date:
Notary Public
(Note: Acknowledgement may vary by State)
2
Exhibit A
PRELIMINARY PLAT
-of- CENTER VILLA SECOND ADDITION
-for- Lake Area UM6Nes
2230 Tart LaK. ke Rodadh�l t
Una Lakes, MN 5503E
I
NORTH
�IY■Y 's--4m=,Ars:e
'` i:.. i •+ LOT I
!
� eL •I P 1
_...
Iti..
1
1
1
� I
-:OU7L°RA
1 •� , ' ee w. I so!
w. I
- 4e• I I t! I
_ IJ
• s ea ee. ra sw
VIA mm IM w.
m 6m
- r .... � . avron.. �n �� � ew w...xr r�i. uaun w •.,<
F- GL Imp
hofessbrKd Land Surveyors6776
••••••`• -Una Lakees MNe55fSi41fe 110
r cl�n)xcaae r (dn)xean, a,a mn• suer+ 1
3
Section
CHAPTER 71: PARKING REGULATIONS
71.01 Parking prohibitions
71.02 Towing of Illegally Parked Vehicles
71.99 Penalty
§ 71.01 PARKING PROHIBITIONS.
(A) Every vehicle parked upon any street with a curb shall be parked parallel to the curb and with the right-
hand wheels of the vehicle within 12 inches of the curb. On other streets, a vehicle shall be parked to
the right of the main traveled portion thereof and parallel thereto and in a manner as not to interfere with
the free flow of traffic. These requirements shall not apply, however, to any vehicle disabled upon any
street, but any police officer may require the person in charge thereof to move it to a place of safety, and
if the movement is not made or if any motor vehicle is left alone or abandoned in that position, the
officer may provide for the removal of the vehicle to the nearest convenient garage or other place of
safekeeping.
(B) No person shall stop, stand or park a vehicle, except when necessary to avoid conflict with other traffic
or in compliance with the directions of a police officer or traffic -control device, in any of the following
places:
(1) On a sidewalk;
(2) In front of a public or private driveway;
(3) Within an intersection;
(4) Within ten feet of a fire hydrant;
(5) On a crosswalk;
(6) Within 20 feet of a crosswalk at an intersection;
(7) Within 30 feet upon the approach to any flashing beacon, stop sign or traffic -control signal
located at the side of the roadway;
(8) Between a safety zone, unless a different length is indicated by signs or markings;
(9) Within 20 feet of the driveway entrance to any fire station and, on the side of the street opposite
the entrance to the fire station, within 75 feet of the entrance when properly sign -posted;
(10) Alongside or opposite any street excavation or obstruction when the stopping, standing or
parking would obstruct traffic;
(11) In the roadway side of any vehicle stopped or parked at the edge or curb of a street; or
(12) At any place where official signs prohibit stopping.
(C) No person shall, for camping purposes, leave or park a house trailer on any street or the right-of-way
thereof.
571Page
(D)No person shall stop or park a vehicle on a street when directed to proceed by any peace officer with
authority to direct traffic.
(E) No vehicle shall be parked on any street for the purpose of displaying it for sale.
(F) (1) No vehicle, except an emergency vehicle on an emergency call, shall be parked between
the hours of 3:00 a.m. and 7:00 a.m., and no vehicle shall in any case be parked upon
any street in any one place for a longer continuous period than 24 hours.
(2)
(G) (1)
(2)
(3)
City Council.
Penalty, see § 71.99
However, these restrictions shall not apply to the parking of one vehicle on the street
due to new construction during the months of March through May of each year.
The City Administrator may issue temporary permits to park on streets during restricted
times.
The permit shall state the duration and location for which the permit is valid.
A fee may be charged for such permits in accordance with a resolution adopted by the
Ord. #16, adopted 06106/1969, Ord. amended 02/0911972, Ord. amended 03/28/1984, Ord. amended
12/1211984
§ 71.02 TOWING OF ILLEGALLY PARKED VEHICLES.
Any vehicle parked in violation of the city code or in violation of state law may be removed by towing
at the direction of the city police to a suitable place for storage until claimed by the owner or agent of the
owner. The owner or other person responsible for such parking of the vehicle shall be liable for the reasonable
cost of such towing and storage upon conviction for such illegal parking. The city shall in no way be liable for
any damage to any vehicle which has been ordered towed away.
Ord. 2d #24, amended 12/10/2008
§ 71.99 PENALTY.
Any person convicted of violating any provision of this chapter shall be guilty of a misdemeanor but if a
minimum fine or imprisonment is prescribed by the State Highway Traffic Act for an offense, the penalty shall
apply to a person convicted of the same offense under this chapter. For continuing violations, each day the
violation exists shall be considered a separate offense.
Ord. #16, adopted 06/06/1969, Ord. 2d #24, amended 12/10/2008
581Page
Charles Roberts
From:
Mike Ericson
Sent:
Tuesday, May 30, 2017 2:58 PM
To:
Charles Roberts
Subject:
FW: parking
From: Chad Wagner[mailto:chad@blueherongrill.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 18, 2017 12:02 PM
To: Mike Ericson <MEricson@CENTERVILLEMN.com>
Subject: parking
Hi Mike,
Just a follow up to our phone conversation earlier this week. It would be great if we could get a permit to park in the
street for the summer. Having 5 kids it gets to be a challenge parking. When my college age son gets back for the
summer we have to shuffle cars all the time. It would seem like a great idea if we were permitted to park on the street
from May 15th thru September 15`h. I totally understand during the winter months, but in the summer I don't see the
problem. Other than street sweeping I don't see what could be the issue. I thank you in advance for looking into this for
the residence of Centerville.
Sincerely,
Chad Wagner
President
Blue Heron Grill
651-756-1894
Tavern on Main
651-783-7106
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please visit http://www.syrnanteccloud.com
Just a follow up to our phone conversation earlier this week. It would be great if we could get a permit to park in the
street for the summer. Having 5 kids it gets to be a challenge parking. When my college age son gets back for the
summer we have to shuffle cars all the time. It would seem like a great idea if we were permitted to park on the street
from May 15th thru September 15th. I totally understand during the winter months, but in the summer I don't see the
problem. Other than street sweeping I don't see what could be the issue. I thank you in advance for looking into this for
the residence of Centerville.
Sincerely,
Chad Wagner
President
Blue Heron Grill
651-756-1894
Tavern on Main
651-783-7106
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please visit http://www.sManteceloud.com