Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2018-01-24 CC Packet t enterviCCITY OF CENTERVILLE COUNCIL MEETING & C ,e CLOSED EXECUTIVE SESSION Wednesday, January 24, 2018 6:30 p.m. or shortly thereafter COUNCIL MEETING L CALL TO ORDER 1. Roll Call II. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE III. APPROVAL OF AGENDA IV. APPOINTMENTS/PRESENTATIONS 1. Res. #18-OOX—Recognizing & Memorializing Jon Grahek for His Years of Dedicated Public Service (Page 1) V. PUBLIC HEARING 1. None. VL APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. January 10, 2018 City Council Meeting Minutes (Pages 2-8) VII. CONSENT AGENDA 1. City of Centerville January 10, 2018 through January 24, 2018 Claims (Check #31607-31622) (Page 9) 2. Centennial Lakes Police Claims through January 11, 2018 (Check 11783-11805) (Page 10) 3. Centennial Fire District Claims through January 8, 2018 (Check#8086-8098) w/EFT US Bank (Page 11) 4. Metro Cities Membership (Pages 12-13) 5. Successful Performance Review City Clerk, Ms. Teresa Bender—Completion of Year 19 VIII. OLD BUSINESS 1. Ruffridge-Johnson a. Conditional Use Permit (Pages 15-18) b. Programatic Stormwater Management Facility Maintenance Agreement with Rice Creek Watershed District (Pages 19-22) c. Pre-development Signage and Equipment/Material Staging (Page 23) 2. Water Rate Tier Structure (Pages 24-30 3. Res. #18-OOX— Sponsorship of Community Development Block Grant (Pages 31-33) IX. NEW BUSINESS 1. Review of Local Water Plan (Pages 34-85) 2. Social Media Policy (Pages 86-90) X. COUNCIL/ADMINISTRATOR ANNOUNCEMENTS 1. Administrator/Engineer Report XI. CLOSED EXECUTIVE SESSION 1. Union Labor Agreement Negotiation Strategy XII. OLD BUSINESS (CONTINUED) 1. Local 49 Labor Contract XIII. ADJOURNMENT *REMINDERS** Sledding& Skate Night, LaMotte Park— Saturday, January 20, 2018 (Free Popcorn, Bonfire & Hot Cocoa) Rush Line Corridor Task Force's accomplishments—Thursday, January 25, 2018 @ 3:30 p.m. at BoatWorks Commons in White Bear Lake. P&Z Committee— Tuesday, February 6, 2018 —6:30 p.m. City Hall P&R Committee—Wednesday, February 7, 2018 —6:30 p.m. City Hall Skate Night, LaMotte Park— Saturday, February 10 2018 (Free PopcornBonfire Hayrides & Hot Cocoa) Police Governing Board—Monday, February 12, 2018 —7:00 p.m. —CLPD City Council —Wednesday, February 14, 2018 —6:30 p.m. City Hall — Saturday, February 17, 2018 — 11:00 a.m. Centerville Lake Lions Ice Fishing Contest v Presidents Day —City Offices Closed—Monday February 19, 2018 Res. #18-00 A RESOLUTION RECOGNIZING& MEMORIALIZING JON GRAHEK FOR HIS YEARS OF DEDICATED PUBLIC SERVICE WHEREAS, Mr. Jon Grahek served for numerous years on the Centennial Lakes Police Commission (2000-2003) prior to the restructuring and appointment of public officials, and WHEREAS, Mr. Jon Grahek was first appointed to the Centerville Parks & Recreation Committee by the City Council on October 28, 2009 and served until December 14, 2016. He also served as Chairperson of the Committee for his final two (2)years, and WHEREAS, Mr. Jon Grahek has served the citizens of Centerville from December 14, 2016 to January of 2018 as a member of the Planning& Zoning Commission, and WHEREAS, Mr. Jon Grahek provided excellent leadership, demonstrated initiative and perseverance through difficult budget, economic and personal challenges, and WHEREAS, Mr. Jon Grahek was a leader, respected by his fellow Committee Members, City staff and elected officials. As a colleague, he always treated fellow Committee/Commission Members with respect and valued their opinions even when they disagreed with him, and WHEREAS, Mr. Jon Grahek was employed with the City of St. Paul as a Sergeant — Chief Inspector, Office of Inspection and had been employed with them for 24 years up until he physically was not able. He served in the capacities of patrol officer, patrol supervisor, a narcotics investigator and the Department's Chief Inspector. He received three commendations during his employment along with the distinguished Chiefs Award. WHEREAS, Mr. Jon Grahek lost his battle with cancer and passed away on Tuesday, January 2, 2018, and WHEREAS, the Council recognizes that when an individual serves, so serves their family. The Council also recognizes and acknowledges their sacrifices along with their loss, and WHEREAS, Mr. Jon Grahek served not only citizens of Centerville but of St. Paul. When individuals provide public service they are giving back to their communities by providing a better place for others to live, work and operate business(es), and NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF CENTERVILLE, MINNESOTA, we recognize Mr. Jon Grahek for his dedication and service to the community. The City of Centerville is indebted to you and your family. You will truly be missed. Adopted by the Council this 24th day of January, 2018. Jeff Paar, Mayor Attested: Teresa Bender, City Clerk ,� CITY OF CENTERVILLE CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES January 10, 2018 6:30 p.m. Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, the City of Centerville held their regularly scheduled meeting of January 10, 2018 at City Hall, 1880 Main Street. PRESENT: Mayor Jeff Paar Council Member Russ Koski Council Member D. Love Council Member Matt Montain lNotCouncil Member Steve King Approved ABSENT: None. STAFF: City Attorney Kurt Glaser City Administrator/Engineer Mark Statz COUNCIL MEETING L CALL TO ORDER Mayor Paar called to order 6:30 p.m. Mayor Paar stated that the community of Centerville lost a valuable public servant on Tuesday, January 2, 2018, Mr. Jon Grahek. He stated that Mr. Grahek was employed as a long-time St. Paul Police Officer, City of Centerville Parks & Recreation Committee Member/Chairperson and Planning & Zoning Commission member. He went on to say that the family has endured quite a bit this past year and that Jon would be greatly missed. Mayor Paar requested that the public and Council Members keep Mrs. Grahek and their son Devin in their thoughts through this difficult period. Council honored Mr. Grahek and his family with a moment of silence. II. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE III. SET AGENDA Mayor Paar stated that replacement pages for the October 30 and December 13, 2017 were placed in Council's packet and that Check #31597-31606 were added to Item #1., Consent Agenda. Motion by Council Member Love, seconded by Council Member King to approve the Agenda as Amended. All in favor. Motion carried. IV. APPOINTMENTS/PRESENTATIONS 2 City of Centerville Council Meeting Minutes January 10,2018 1. None. V. PUBLIC HEARING 1. None. VI. APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES 1. October 30, 2017 City Council Special Session Mayor Paar provided Council with an opportunity for amendments. 2. November 8, 2017 City Council Closed Executive Session Meeting Minutes Mayor Paar provided Council with an opportunity for amendments. 3. December 13, 2017 City Council Meeting Minutes Mayor Paar provided Council with an opportunity for amendments. Motion by Council Member Montain, seconded by Council Member Love to Approve the October 30, November 8, and December 13, 2017 Council Special Session, Closed Executive Session and Council Meeting Minutes as presented, respectively. All in favor. Motion carried. VI. CONSENT AGENDA 1. City of Centerville December 14, 2017 through January 10, 2018 Claims (Check #31538-31596) & (Check#31597-31606) 2. Centennial Lakes Police Claims through January 3, 2018 (Check#11736-11782) w/EFTs from Optum Bank & Visa 3. Centennial Fire District Claims through December 26, 2017 (Check#8054-8080) WEFT for US Bank (Home Depot) 4. 2018 membership—Mediation Services for Anoka County 5. 2018 Tru-Green Contract (Turf Maintenance) 6. 2018 Contribution to Stepping Stone Emergency Housing Mayor Paar provided an opportunity for Council Members to add additional items or remove items for further discussion. Council Member Montain requested that Item #5 be removed from the Consent Agenda for additional discussion. Motion by Council Member Montain, seconded by Council Member Love to approve Items #14 & #6 of the Consent Agenda as Presented. All in favor. Motion carried. Page 2 of 7 3 City of Centerville Council Meeting Minutes January 10,2018 Council Member Montain questioned the need for obtaining bids or whether this was a continuation of the current contract. Administrator Statz stated that in the past the City had two (2) separate contractors that provided lawnmowing and weed control; however, both of these contractors went out of business within the contract periods so that the current contracts do not renew simultaneously. He stated that Public Works Director Palzer desires to renew the existing contact with Tru-Green for one (1) year allowing for the potential to secure one (1) contractor for all services by bidding both in 2019. Tru-Green has agreed to hold its prices again this year, as it has for several years. Motion by Council Member Montain, seconded by Council Member Koski to Approve Consent Agenda Item #5. Lengthy discussion ensued regarding applicators, need for licensing, ability to obtain eco- friendly applications, cost variations, timing of the renewal and additional research going forward prior to contract bidding in 2019. All in favor. Motion carried. VI. OLD BUSINESS 1. 2018 Fee Schedule—Water Rate Tier System & Water Meter City Administrator Statz stated that legislation was enacted requiring municipalities to conserve water resources and that the City of Centerville, similarly to many others, have taken the approach that tier rating for water utilities would heighten the public's awareness of conserving water. However, the City of Centerville's tier rating does not commence until usage exceeds 90,000 gallons in a two (2) month period. He stated that comparative to other communities, the City's lower tier fees are higher, but the higher tiers' fees are lower than surrounding cities. Lengthy discussion ensued regarding rate increases, fund increases, potential for penalizing larger families, watering regulations for new sod, amount of delinquencies, adjusting for revenue neutrality and consensus for water conservation. Administrator Statz will gather additional information for further discussion. He also stated that the City has received costs associated with purchasing water meters and the fees should be adjusted for resale at the same time. 2. Donor Agreement w/Mr. Tom Dupre Administrator Statz stated that a donor agreement has been reached with Mr. Tom Dupre which differs from the previous agreement which contained a 100 year clause for a donor to request return of items. He stated that there are two (2) lists of items which contain items that they can retrieve from the City within a set period of time and a list of items that they have no control over which will be encompassed in the grant. Administrator Statz stated that staff is working Page 3 of 7 4 City of Centerville Council Meeting Minutes January 10,2018 with several agencies to host the items once inventorying has been completed (i.e. Centerville Elementary, Wargo Nature Center, City Hall and Anoka County Historical Society). Discussion ensued regarding additional grant opportunities for display casings, volunteers, rotation of items, Centerville's "small-town" feel relating to the Comprehensive Plan, City Hall facelift, capital improvements, budgeted items and the need for preserving heritage. Motion by Council Member Montain, seconded by Council Member King to Approve Donor Agreements, Dupre Family Artifacts as Presented. All in favor. Motion carried. 3. Professional Services Contract for Have Gloves Will Travel, LLC — Ms. Rose Kubiatowicz (Dupre Artifacts Grant) A requirement for the grant is that all items are cataloged in PastPerfect software and Ms. Kubiatowicz is familiar with the software, is knowledgeable in this area and comes highly recommended. Administrator Statz stated that with the donor agreements approved, it would be appropriate for the council to enter into a contract with Have Gloves Will Travel, to complete the work outlined in the grant. Motion by Council Member Koski, seconded by Council Member Love to Enter into a Contract for Professional Services with Have Gloves Will Travel, LLC — Ms. Rose Kubiatowicz to Catalogue the Dupre Family Artifacts as Presented. All in favor. Motion carried. 4. Final Payment— Centerville Road (CSAH 21) Reconstruction—Anoka County Administrator Statz passed out a breakdown of costs associated with the entire project which was requested by Council Member King. This information was previously presented to Council several months ago. He reviewed the handout with Council and stated that, per Council's desire, $10,000 was withheld from the final payment due to additional work needing completion (lowering a pipe at the entrance of 6709 Centerville Road). Anoka County agreed to complete the work prior to winter and staff has approved the work less final grading and seeding which would be completed in the spring. Council Member Montain stated that a true test of the lowering had not occurred prior to snowfall so he hopes that the correction is satisfactory. Council desired that a letter be forwarded with payment stating that the City anticipated the final grading and seeding to be completed in the spring. Motion by Council Member Koski, seconded by Council Member Love to Release Final Payment of $10,000 to Anoka County Highway Department for the Centerville Road (CSAH 21) Reconstruction Proiect with a Letter of Anticipation for Completion in the spring of 2018. Four in favor; Council Member Montain Abstained. Motion carried. IX. NEW BUSINESS Page 4 of 7 5 City of Centerville Council Meeting Minutes January 10,2018 1. Schedule Goal Setting Workshop Administrator Statz stated that at the beginning of each year, Council schedules a Goal Setting Workshop. Council may choose to schedule that Work Session as a Joint Committee/Commission/Council Work Session or keep it as a Council-only event. Administrator Statz stated that he would desire that in future years this item be scheduled in November of the prior year. Council consensus was to have it be a joint session. Lengthy discussion ensued regarding whether to schedule the meeting prior to a regularly scheduled Council meeting or following the meeting. Consensus was to schedule the session ahead of a regular meeting to allow Committee/Commission members to better manage their time and attendance of the meeting. The Work Session was scheduled for February 28, 2018, 6:00 p.m. or shortly thereafter. The Work Session will be scheduled as part of the regular meeting, with an anticipated end-time of 8:00 p.m. Administrator Statz stated that Staff would notify Committee/Commission members in advance of the meeting via email. 2. Pay Plan & Matrix for 2018 Administrator Statz requested that the item be discussed following the Closed Executive Session as union negotiations and annual cost of living adjustment(s) are interconnected. 3. Replacement of Small Truck Snow Plow Administrator Statz stated that one (1) of the plows has suffered significant damage and staff would like to replace it immediately. Discussion ensued regarding: condition of connection apparatus, purchase from Cooperative Purchasing — MN State Contract, resale of the existing plow, value, compatibility with a new vehicle, purchasing, duplication of parts, etc. Motion by Council Member Koski, seconded by Council Member Montain to Approve the Replacement of One (1) 9'-2" Boss DXT Duel Trip Vee Plow from Crysteel in an Amount Not to Exceed $8,306.75 w/Accessories as Outlined in the Bid Presented. All in favor. Motion carried. Council Member Montain requested that the old plow to be sold quickly. X. COUNCIL/ADMINISTRATOR ANNOUNCEMENTS 1. Monthly Administrator's Report Administrator Statz requested feedback from Council as to the content and presentation of the Council Agenda and packet. Mayor Paar stated that he liked the Request for Council Action Form and felt that the compilation and clarity of the packet was easily understandable and user friendly. Council Member Koski concurred. Page 5 of 7 6 City of Centerville Council Meeting Minutes January 10,2018 Administrator Statz reported that he and Attorney Glaser met with Ruffridge Johnson earlier in the day and stated that their due diligence period ends at the end of January with their 1031 Exchange ending on April 3, 2018. He felt that they would be commencing construction shortly thereafter. 2. Anoka County Local Government Officials Meeting Administrator Statz stated that the Anoka County Local Government Officials meeting is scheduled for January 31, is a good group that provides a large amount of information and to let Staff know if they desire to attend. Council Member Paar stated that the Centennial Fire Steering meeting will be held the following evening and that it will be the first meeting of the year. Council Member Koski stated that WSB attended the P & Z meeting, lengthy discussion was had and they provided a presentation of the comprehensive plan to date. He stated that the Commission desired for additions such as consideration for building around Centerville, the downtown area, the lakes as an attraction and how much of the terminology of"small-town" feel should be utilized in the document. Council Member Montain stated that he attended a recent Parks & Recreation Committee meeting where they are preparing for their annual skating parties. He stated that the first is scheduled for January 20, 2018 which would include a sledding hill dedication and party. He also stated that they have scheduled their second Skate Night for February 10, 2018 from 6:00 p.m. — 9:00 p.m. with free hayrides from 6:30 p.m. — 8:30 p.m. with both events providing free hot cocoa, popcorn and a bonfire. Council Member Montain reported that the Committee graciously accepted an $8,000 donation from the Dead Broke Saddle Club for park improvement. Administrator Statz stated that he attended the meeting, discussed park dedication revenue, capital improvements and provided suggestions for condensing their meetings. Mayor Paar requested that the paper provide language regarding the City's twitter and to follow it in the summary of Council action. He stated that the City is attempting to broaden outreach and would be commencing a Facebook page shortly. Mayor Paar also stated that the warming house and hockey/pleasure rinks are open and that the City is looking to fill two (2) part-time rink attendant positions. Mayor Paar reported that the City of Columbus has entertained the construction of an asphalt plant near the current Running Aces Casino, modified their ordinance allowing the use and would be meeting again to consider approval. Mayor Paar stated that discussions have been had with local entities (i.e., RCWD, Met. Council and Anoka County) regarding impacts on the community, wetlands and surrounding communities; including traffic, etc. Mayor Paar reported that he and Administrator Statz would be attending an upcoming Chamber of Commerce meeting and providing a"State of the City" address. Page 6 of 7 7 City of Centerville Council Meeting Minutes January 10,2018 Mayor Paar recessed the meeting to enter a Closed Executive Session for the purposes of discussing union contract negotiation strategy, at 8:19 p.m. XI. CLOSED EXECUTIVE SESSION (Meeting minutes will become available once negotiations have been completed and an agreement is ratified). Mayor Paar closed the Closed Executive Session at 9:29 p.m. and reopened the Regularly Scheduled Council Meeting, reporting that discussion was had regarding the renewal of the Local 49er's Union Contract. XII. ADDITIONAL OLD BUSINESS 1. Local 49er Union Contract No action was taken on the Union Contract. Staff was directed to continue negotiations. 2. Pay Plan & Matrix for 2018— See Above Consensus was to delay consideration due to the outcome of the Closed Executive Session and address the item at a later date. XIII. ADJOURNMENT Motion by Council Member Montain, seconded by Council Member King to Adiourn the Regularly Scheduled Meeting of January 10, 2018 at 9:41 p.m. All in favor. Motion carried. Respectfully submitted by City Clerk, Teresa Bender Page 7 of 7 8 CITY OF CENTERVILLE 01/19/1810:42 AM Page 1 Check Detail - January 24, 2018 Check Date Check# Vender Name Comments Amount 1/12/2018 001128E HEALTH PARTNERS shortage on Nov. 1,2017 billing Check Nbr 001128 HEALTH PARTNERS $0.06 1/9/2018 001129E TASC FSA W/H - PAY PERIOD 1 Check Nbr 001129 TASC $258.32 1/11/2018 031607 NATIONWIDE RETIREMENT SOLUTION DEF. COMP-PAY PERIOD 1 Check Nbr 031607 NATIONWIDE RETIREMENT SOLUTION $1,020.83 1/24/2018 031608 ALL COVERED INC. COMPUTER&NETWORK SUPPORT Check Nbr 031608 ALL COVERED INC. $275.00 1/24/2018 031609 AMERICAN BUILDING CONTRACTORS REFUND- 17-568 6936 OAK CIRCLE $119.80 1/24/2018 031609 AMERICAN BUILDING CONTRACTORS REFUND- 17-568 6936 OAK CIRCLE $1.00 Check Nbr 031609 AMERICAN BUILDING CONTRACTORS $120.80 1/24/2018 031610 CORE&MAIN WATER METER PARTS Check Nbr 031610 CORE&MAIN $867.49 1/24/2018 031611 DELTA DENTAL FEB. 2018 DENTAL INSURANCE Check Nbr 031611 DELTA DENTAL $282.95 1/24/2018 031612 INNOVATIVE OFFICE SOLUTIONS LL OFFICE SUPPLIES $97.26 1/24/2018 031612 INNOVATIVE OFFICE SOLUTIONS LL CREDIT-DOC#SCN-067846 -$32.16 1/24/2018 031612 INNOVATIVE OFFICE SOLUTIONS LL OFFICE SUPPLIES 118.46 Check Nbr 031612 INNOVATIVE OFFICE SOLUTIONS LL $183.56 1/24/2018 031613 INTERSTATE POWER SYSTEM REPAIRS TO LIFT STATION GENERATOR Check Nbr 031613 INTERSTATE POWER SYSTEM $778.90 1/24/2018 031614 LEAGUE OF MN CITIES M. STATZ-2018 SAFETY&LOSS CONTROL WORKSHOPS Check Nbr 031614 LEAGUE OF MN CITIES $20.00 1/24/2018 031615 MARCO, INC. KONICA MINOLTA AGREEMENT-COPIER AGREEMENT Check Nbr 031615 MARCO,INC. $241.32 1/24/2018 031616 MET. COUNCIL ENV.SERV. (SDS) FEB. 2018 WASTEWATER SERVICES Check Nbr 031616 MET. COUNCIL ENV. SERV. (SDS) $19,408.64 1/24/2018 031617 MN DEPT OF LABOR&INDUSTRY 4TH QTR 2017-BLDG.STATE SURCHARGE $408.25 1/24/2018 031617 MN DEPT OF LABOR&INDUSTRY 4TH QTR 2017-PLUMBING STATE SURCHARGE $12.00 1/24/2018 031617 MN DEPT OF LABOR&INDUSTRY 4TH QTR 2017-MECHANICAL STATE SURCHARGE $15.00 1/24/2018 031617 MN DEPT OF LABOR&INDUSTRY 4TH QTR 2017-ELECTRICAL STATE SURCHARGE $45.00 Check Nbr 031617 MN DEPT OF LABOR&INDUSTRY $480.25 1/24/2018 031618 NORTHLAND SECURITIES,INC. ANNUAL DISCLOSURE REPORT FOR FISCAL YR END 12-31-16 Check Nbr 031618 NORTHLAND SECURITIES, INC. $2,650.00 1/24/2018 031619 PRESS PUBLICATIONS BUDGET SUMMARY Check Nbr 031619 PRESS PUBLICATIONS $102.46 1/24/2018 031620 SMITH&GLASER, LLC OCT/NOV 2017 PROSECUTION MATTERS Check Nbr 031620 SMITH&GLASER, LLC $9,184.00 1/24/2018 031621 VERIZION WIRELESS CELL PHONE SERVICE THRU 1-9-2018 $51.55 1/24/2018 031621 VERIZION WIRELESS CELL PHONE SERVICE THRU 1-9-2018 $154.66 1/24/2018 031621 VERIZION WIRELESS CELL PHONE SERVICE THRU 1-9-2018 $51.55 1/24/2018 031621 VERIZION WIRELESS CELL PHONE SERVICE THRU 1-9-2018 51.55 Check Nbr 031621 VERIZION WIRELESS $309.31 1/24/2018 031622 XCEL ENERGY 1745 MAIN ST-SERV THRU 1-4-18 $19.03 1/24/2018 031622 XCEL ENERGY 1737 MAIN ST-SERV THRU 1-4-18 $60.33 1/24/2018 031622 XCEL ENERGY STREET LIGHTS-SERV THRU 1-4-18 $1,996.74 1/24/2018 031622 XCEL ENERGY 1875 FOX RUN -PUMP-SERV THRU 1-6-18 $172.34 1/24/2018 031622 XCEL ENERGY 1600 LAMOTTE DR-WARMING HOUSE-SERV THRU 1-4-18 $64.85 1/24/2018 031622 XCEL ENERGY 7300 MILL RD-SEWER LIFT-SERV THRU 1-4-18 $218.94 1/24/2018 031622 XCEL ENERGY 1889 CENTER ST-SEWER LIFT-SERV THRU 1-4-18 $34.20 1/24/2018 031622 XCEL ENERGY 1600 LAMOTTE DR- BALL FIELD LIGHTS-SERV THRU 1-8-18 $193.49 1/24/2018 031622 XCEL ENERGY 7285 MAIN ST-SERV THRU 1-6-18 $58.48 1/24/2018 031622 XCEL ENERGY 1682 MAIN ST-SERV THRU 1-4-18 $186.77 1/24/2018 031622 XCEL ENERGY 7098 CENTERVILLE RD-SERV THRU 1-4-18 $19.03 1/24/2018 031622 XCEL ENERGY 1880 MAIN ST-CITY HALL/FIRE STATION -SERV THRU 1-8- $614.34 1/24/2018 031622 XCEL ENERGY 1880 MAIN ST-SERV THRU 1-8-18 $1,079.76 1/24/2018 031622 XCEL ENERGY 1601 LAMOTTE DR-SERV THRU 1-4-18 $22.72 1/24/2018 031622 XCEL ENERGY 6970 LAMOTTE DR-SERV THRU 1-6-18 $512.20 Check Nbr 031622 XCEL ENERGY $5,253.22 Total checks$41,437.11 9 CENTENNIAL LAKES POLICE DEPT Check Register-Police GL without invoice numbers Page: 1 Check Issue Dates: 1/4/2018- 1/11/2018 Jan 11, 2018 01:52PM Report Criteria: Report type: Summary GL Check Ck No Description Check Period Issue Date Payee Amount 01/18 01/08/2018 11783 MINNESOTA POST BOARD PEACE OFFICER LIC R.HERNANDEZ 90.00 01/18 01/09/2018 11784 MATTHEW GIESE 2018 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE 500.00 01/18 01/11/2018 11785 PATRICK ALDRICH SHOES 119.98 01/18 01/11/2018 11786 ANOKA COUNTY 4TH QTR CJDN/MDT 540.00 01/18 01/11/2018 11787 ANOKA CO CHIEFS OF POLICE ASSN MEETING EXPENSES 2017 336.00 01/18 01/11/2018 11788 ANOKA CO TREASURY DEPT. FEB BROADBAND 75.00 01/18 01/11/2018 11789 ASPEN MILLS, INC JACKET PA 107.70 01/18 01/11/2018 11790 AXON ENTERPRISE, INC MOLLE MOUNT/BELT CLIP/MAGNET M 112.81 01/18 01/11/2018 11791 CENTURY LINK COMMUNICATIONS JAN 115.79 01/18 01/11/2018 11792 CONSOLIDATED COMMUNICATIONS PHONES JAN 382.97 01/18 01/11/2018 11793 DEARBORN NATIONAL FEB LIFE/DISABILITY PREM 1,659.56 01/18 01/11/2018 11794 DON'S CIRCLE SERVICE, INC VEHICLE REPAIRS &MTC 276.50 01/18 01/11/2018 11795 EMERGENCY AUTO TECH ,INC GPS REPAIR 154.30 01/18 01/11/2018 11796 HOLIDAY COMPANIES FUEL DEC 2,591.85 01/18 01/11/2018 11797 KNOWLAN'S SUPER MARKETS DISH SOAP 4.27 01/18 01/11/2018 11798 MN CHIEFS OF POLICE ASSOC 2018 MEMBERSHIP DUES 319.00 01/18 01/11/2018 11799 NEAL A. NOREN DEC BLDG MTC HOURS 120.00 01/18 01/11/2018 11800 OFFICE OF MN IT SERVICES DEC WAN SERVICES 57.20 01/18 01/11/2018 11801 CITY OF ROSEVILLE 2018 NETMOTION MOBILITY SERVICE 7,622.00 01/18 01/11/2018 11802 SHRED-N-GO, INC DEC SHREDDING 48.83 01/18 01/11/2018 11803 STREICHER'S, INC 12 GA LESS LETHA ROUNDS BEAN B 472.99 01/18 01/11/2018 11804 TRANSUNION RISK&ALTERNATIVE INVESTIGATION EXPENSES DEC 25.00 01/18 01/11/2018 11805 U.S. HEALTH WORKS MEDICAL PERSONNEL TESTING RH 438.00 Grand Totals: 16,169.75 M = Manual Check, V=Void Check 10 CENTENNIAL FIRE DISTRICT Check Register-FIRE GL Page: 1 Check Issue Dates: 12/27/2017- 1/8/2018 Jan 09, 2018 10:01AM Report Criteria: Report type: Summary GL Check Check Vendor Description Check Period Issue Date Number Number Payee Amount 01/18 01/08/2018 8086 10290 ALEX AIR APPARATUS, INC 4 FIREFIGHTERS COATS/PANT 9,520.00 01/18 01/08/2018 8087 10850 ANOKA COUNTY TREASURY D FEB BROADBAND 112.50 01/18 01/08/2018 8088 11565 ASPEN MILLS, INC JACKET VNP ADDITION 8.85 01/18 01/08/2018 8089 20120 BATTERIES PLUS BULBS 6V, 1.5 V ALKALINE & AAAA BA 151.24 01/18 01/08/2018 8090 31050 COMFORT PLUS, HEATING and STATION 3 HEATER REPAIR 390.74 01/18 01/08/2018 8091 60300 FIRE SAFETY USA, INC LADDER 1 REPAIR 40,178.50 01/18 01/08/2018 8092 60650 FRATTALLONE'S HARDWARE S 3 CFL BIAZ 2PIN PLUG IN 7 W 23.97 01/18 01/08/2018 8093 130297 MARTIN-MCALLISTER CONSUL PUBLIC SAFETY ASSESSMENT 500.00 01/18 01/08/2018 8094 160130 PERFORMANCE PLUS LLC MEDICAL EXAM R.DION 4,672.00 01/18 01/08/2018 8095 160495 PRESS PUBLICATIONS SANTA PARADE AD 300.00 01/18 01/08/2018 8096 180600 CITY OF ROSEVILLE DEC PHONES 1,114.70 01/18 01/08/2018 8097 220200 VERIZON WIRELESS 11/16-12/15 MOBILE BROADBA 210.06 01/18 01/08/2018 8098 230325 WEX BANK FUEL DEC 407.82 01/18 01/08/2018 2018001 210300 US BANK DEC VISA TARPS/BATTERIES 389.76 Grand Totals: 57,980.14 M = Manual Check, V=Void Check 11 CITY OF CENTERVILLE REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION entervi(Ce E77 Agenda Item# Department: Requested Council Meeting Date: Administration January 24, 2018 TITLE OF ISSUE: Metro Cities Membership BACKGROUND AND SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION: Centerville has, annually, supported membership with "Metro Cities", which is an organization providing legislative lobbying and other policy support, in cooperation with the League of Minnesota Cities. Staff believes this membership to be a good value and an important part of our participation in the state's broader policy discussions. COST AND SOURCE(S) OF FUNDING: $1,864 -Budgeted - General Levy REQUESTED COUNCIL ACTION: Motion to support annual membership to Minnesota Cities. For Clerk's Use: SUPPORTED DOCUMENTS ATTACHED Motion By: Resolution Ordinance Contract Minutes Plan Map Second By: Vote Record: A e Nay King Other(specify) Letter from Metro Cities/Invoice Love Paar Koski Montain Administration Department Use: Refer to: Consent Tabled Until: Regular Other: 12 METRO CITIES Association of Metropolitan Municipalities January J, 2018 Mark tatz City Administrator City of Centerville 1880 Maint Centerville, MN, 55038-9701 Dear Mark: Hello and I Iappy New Year to you. Enclosed please find an invoice for your city's 2018 Metro Cities' membership dues. The dues reflect a 1% increase as approved y the Metro Cities Board of Directors. t to take this oo ty to thank you for your membership in Metro Cities. Metro Cities represents the shared interests of metropolitanarea cities before the Legislature, Executive Branch .Metropolitan Council. Your membership is critical to assuring strong representation on issues tat impact metropolitan area communities. MetroCities' 2018 legislativepolicies are available online at w. ° ' s . These policies will serve as the frameworkof our workt the Legislatureetro o itan Council this year, you would like a hard copy, please give us a call at 651-215-4000. We look forward to working with you in the coming year. Please be sure to contact me with any questions at 651-215-4002. er ly, icia o an Execrative Director Evac, 145 t.; lvers ay Ave"t ' r.Paul.MN 55103-2044 0 Phone(6 154000 (651)281-1299 a w%vw.Nle -oCh:.rr t e r /1-N T PIV METRO k-., JL I IES Association of Metropolitan Municipalities Invoice Number: 12 DESCRIPTION: 2018 Membership Dues for the City of Centerville. .....................-..............------................................................................................................ ........................................................................ CONTACT INFORMATION: ................ ....................... ................................................................................................................................................. ....................................................................... Mark Statz City Administrator .....................................-----.................................................................................................. ....................... ................................................ INVOICE DATE: ......................... ............................................................................................................................................................. ................................................. .......................... January 3, 2018 ........................I.......................-----------------.............................................——----------------------------....................----—--------------------------------------------------................................................ DUE DATE: INVOICE TOTAL: ....................................................................................................---------______-n.........................,............................................................................................................................... February 2, 2018 (30 days) $1.864 .................................................------...................................................... Make checks payable to and mail to.- Metro Cities 145 University Ave, W. St. Paul MN 55103-2044 ................... ......................................................... ........................................................................... ........................................................................................ STAFF CONTACT: ................................................................................................--------..................................................... ........................................................................................................... Kimberly Ciarroa Office Manager Phone: 651-215-4000 Email traitis gar ...........................................K.im��. ...................................................... ............ ------................................................... ......................................................----------------- 14 CITY OF CENTERVILLE REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION entervi(Ce E77 Agenda Item# Department: Requested Council Meeting Date: Administration January 24, 2018 TITLE OF ISSUE: Ruffridge Johnson Conditional Use Permit BACKGROUND AND SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION: The proposed Ruffridge Johnson site development requires a Conditional User Permit(CUP)for the operation of a construction equipment sales, leasing, maintenance and repair business, in the B-1 zoning district. A public hearing was held at a Planning and Zoning Commission meeting, where the CUP was recommended to Council for approval along with a Findings of Fact. The City Council, subsequently, approved the CUP at its February 28, 2018 meeting. However the CUP contained a clause that made it null and void if the property sale was not closed within 10 days of June 1, 2017. Since the sale did not close within this timeframe, the CUP was not recorded against the property. Staff is recommending the re-approval of the Conditional Use Permit, with minor changes which have been shared with and agreed to by Ruffridge Johnson. COST AND SOURCE(S) OF FUNDING: No cost. REQUESTED COUNCIL ACTION: Authorize execution of Conditional Use Permit for Ruffridge Johnson. For Clerk's Use: SUPPORTED DOCUMENTS ATTACHED Motion By: Resolution Ordinance Contract Minutes Plan Map Second By: Vote Record: A e Nay King Other(specify) CUP Love Paar Koski Montain Administration Department Use: Refer to: Consent Tabled Until: Regular Other: 15 ------------------------------------------------------------------------- CITY OF CENTERVILLE ANOKA COUNTY, MINNESOTA APPROVAL OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 1. Permit. Subject to the terms and conditions set forth herein, the City of Centerville hereby grants approval of a conditional use permit for: Jon Pederson and Ruffridge Johnson Equipment Company, 2065 Commerce Drive to operate an equipment company (paving, milling and aggregate processing)business including sales, lease, repair and maintenance shop with the sale of related hand tools and safety equipment subject the conditions of this permit. 2. Property. The permit is for the following described property: 2065 Commerce Drive Lot 2, Block I Clearwater Business PIN#R24-31-22-23-0017 Park, Ex Rd Subj to Ease of Rec 3. Conditions. This permit is issued subject to the following conditions: a) A maximum of one vehicle or piece of equipment for sale or lease may be displayed outside the fenced-in area at any one time and must be parked on a paved surface or display pad, excluding areas reserved for employees or customers. b) Outside storage shall be within a fenced-in area and shall be within the southerly 78 feet of the northerly 93 feet of Lot 2, Block 1, Clearwater Creek Business Park, except the westerly 205 feet and easterly 38 feet of said area. c) The City shall not post Commerce Drive with axle weight load restrictions of less than 9 tons. d) Employee parking will be to the south side of the building and on bituminous pavement only. e) Owner/operator will comply with minimal landscaping and parking lot lighting standards within (12) months from the date of the building permit, subject to extension by the City Council per City Code. 16 f) Future paving requirements may pertain, dependent upon usage, and will meet minimum standards. g) Bulk gasoline or other fuels, and lubricants or other chemicals shall not be stored on site except in approved containers and in locations specifically approved in the site plan. h) The fenced area shall be properly maintained. i) Limits on the noise emitted at the property line shall conform to the noise regulations contained in City Code Section 91.09 and other nuisance regulations contained in Chapter 91. j) Landowner and business operator shall be jointly and individually responsible for the continuing conformance with this Conditional Use Permit and that if the sale of this property does not close Prior to April 30, 2018, this Conditional Use Permit will become null and void. j) Grantee will follow the applicable standards and requirements of the City of Centerville, Rice Creek Watershed District, Anoka County, Army Corp of Engineers, FEMA, Minnesota DNR and any other agency having jurisdiction over the property and shall secure and file with the City, any permits required by outside agencies. k) The City reserves the right to annually review this permit for compliance with the conditions and may impose additional conditions to mitigate unforeseen problems. Dated: RUFFRIDGE JOHSON EQUIPMENT COMPANY BY: Jon Pederson STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ss. COUNTY OF ANOKA ) The foregoing was acknowledged before me this day of 2018. by Jon Pederson, for himself and Ruffridge Johnson Equipment Company, a Minnesota corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to authority granted by that corporation. Notary Public 17 Dated: CITY OF CENTERVILLE BY: Jeff Parr, Mayor Attest: Teresa Bender, City Clerk STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF ANOKA ) The foregoing was acknowledged before me this day of 2018. by Jeff Parr, Mayor and Teresa Bender, Clerk of the City of Centerville, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to authority granted by its City Council. Notary Public Drafted by: City of Centerville 1880 Main Street Centerville, MN 55038 18 CITY OF CENTERVILLE REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION entervi(Ce E77 Agenda Item# Department: Requested Council Meeting Date: Administration January 24, 2018 TITLE OF ISSUE: Programmatic Stormwater Management Facility Maintenance Agreement BACKGROUND AND SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION: As a condition of the Rice Creek Watershed District's (RCWD)permit for the Ruffridge Johnson site development, a maintenance agreement for the associated Stormwater Best Management Practices (BMPs); ponds, infiltration trenches, etc., is required. The city has the option of adopting a site-specific agreement to cover the BMPs for this project, or adopting a city-wide "programmatic" agreement to cover all RCWD-permitted sites. Staff is recommending the programmatic agreement to ensure consistency in maintenance standards. The agreement largely mirrors the requirements of the NDPES/MS4 permit which governs the maintenance standards for all BMPs, throughout the city. COST AND SOURCE(S) OF FUNDING: No direct cost. Costs for BMP maintenance are already part of city's obligation under NPDES/MS4 permit. REQUESTED COUNCIL ACTION: Authorize execution of Programmatic Stormwater Management Facility Maintenance Agreement with Rice Creek Watershed District. For Clerk's Use: SUPPORTED DOCUMENTS ATTACHED Motion By: Resolution Ordinance Contract Minutes Plan Map Second By: Vote Record: A e Nay King Other(specify) Agreement Love Paar Koski Montain Administration Department Use: Refer to: Consent Tabled Until: Regular Other: 19 PROGRAMMATIC STORMWATER MANAGEMENT FACILITY MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT Rice Creek Watershed District and the [CITY] This Agreement is by and between the Rice Creek Watershed District, a special purpose unit of government with powers set forth in Minnesota Statutes Chapters 103B and 103D (RCWD), and the [CITY], a charter city and political subdivision of the State of Minnesota (CITY). Recitals WHEREAS pursuant to Minnesota Statutes � 103D.345, the RCWD has adopted and implements Rule C, Stormwater Management Plans; WHEREAS under Rule C, certain land development activity requires a landowner to record a declaration establishing the landowner's perpetual obligation to inspect and maintain stormwater management facilities; WHEREAS a public landowner may memorialize its obligations in an unrecorded written agreement with the RCWD instead of a recorded instrument; WHEREAS from time to time CITY is subject to stormwater facility maintenance requirements pursuant to the terms of an RCWD permit; WHEREAS CITY, as a Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4), is obligated to inspect and maintain its stormwater management facilities in accordance with the terms of a Clean Water Act permit administered by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, and the parties desire to promote consistency in facility management requirements consistent with RCWD authority to set requirements necessary to meet its rules;and WHEREAS the RCWD and CITY concur that it is more effective and procedurally more efficient for the RCWD and CITY to agree on standard requirements for stormwater facility inspection and maintenance, and to memorialize these requirements in this Agreement for incorporation into future permits. THEREFORE: 1. CITY agrees to inspect and maintain all stormwater best management practices (BMPs), owned by the City or maintained by the City under another intergovernmental agreement, that have been permitted by the RCWD under Rule C as follows: a. Outfalls, sediment basins, retention/detention ponds will be inspected at least once every five years. If warranted by required sediment removal or maintenance needs, inspections will be conducted at a greater frequency. b. Structural stormwater management facilities including, but not limited to,grit chambers, sump catch basins, sump manholes and appurtenant conveyances, as well as infiltration and 1 20 biofiltration BMPs including, but not limited to,vegetated swales, rain gardens and filtration features,will be inspected annually to ensure structural integrity, proper function and treatment effectiveness. If, after the first two annual inspections, maintenance or sediment removal is not required then the frequency will be reduced to once every two (2) years. Should a subsequent inspection indicate the need for sediment removal or maintenance, the inspection schedule will revert to annual inspections following the completion of the maintenance work. If, after the first two post-maintenance annual inspections, no additional maintenance or sediment removal is required, then the inspection frequency will be reduced to once every two (2) years. c. Proprietary devices will be inspected per manufacturer/installer recommendations, and at least annually. d. All inspections will occur at a time that allows CITY to determine if the facility is functioning as designed. e. In addition, CITY will respond promptly to notice from the RCWD that a facility may require inspection or maintenance. Within one month of notice, CITY will inspect and advise the RCWD on the results of the inspection. 2. CITY will maintain, repair and replace BMPs when inspection indicates this is necessary to restore design performance. Maintenance necessity will be as recommended in Minnesota Stormwater Manual guidance. CITY will complete work within six (6) months of inspection, except that periodic sediment removal from basins will be completed within eighteen (18) months of inspection. Alternatively, an RCWD-approved maintenance schedule may be used as a work timeline. 3. CITY will submit a copy of its MS4 permit annual report to the RCWD at the same time that it is required to be submitted to the MPCA,with any supplement as needed to briefly describe dates, locations and descriptions of inspection and maintenance activities. 4. RCWD permits for specific projects may contain additional inspection and maintenance conditions as the RCWD may find warranted under the circumstances of a specific permit. 5. If CITY conveys into private ownership a fee interest in any property that has become subject to this Agreement, it shall require as a condition of sale, and enforce: (a) that the purchaser record a declaration on the property incorporating the stormwater management facility maintenance requirements of this Agreement;and (b) that recordation occur either before any encumbrance is recorded on the property or, if after, only as accompanied by a subordination and consent executed by the encumbrance holder ensuring that the declaration will run with the land in perpetuity. If CITY conveys into public ownership a fee interest in any property that has become subject to this Agreement, it shall require as a condition of the purchase and sale agreement that before closing, the purchaser execute an agreement with the RCWD assuming the obligations of this agreement and releasing CITY from same. 6. This Agreement may be amended only in a writing signed by the parties. 7. This Agreement is in force for five years from the date on which it is fully executed and will renew automatically for five-year terms unless terminated. Either party may terminate the 2 21 Agreement on 30 days'written notice to the other. The terms of this Agreement are incorporated into any future permit issued to the CITY by explicit reference to this Agreement under the maintenance conditions of that permit. Any obligations vested in CITY through incorporation into an issued permit before the effective date of termination of this Agreement will survive expiration. 8. The recitals above are incorporated as a part of this Agreement. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement. RICE CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT By Date: (Print name: Its Approved as to form and execution By Its Attorney [CITY] By: Date: (Print name: Its 3 22 CITY OF CENTERVILLE REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION entervi(Ce Agenda Item# Department: Requested Council Meeting Date: Administration January 24, 2018 TITLE OF ISSUE: Ruffridge Johnson -Pre-sale Requests BACKGROUND AND SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION: Ruffridge Johnson has made a request to be allowed to do two things prior to closing on the property (scheduled for April 3rd): -Erect a temporary sign on the site along the lines of"Future Home of Ruffridge Johnson" - Stage materials and equipment on the site Staff has cleared these issues with the City's current Realtor for the site. COST AND SOURCE(S) OF FUNDING: No cost. REQUESTED COUNCIL ACTION: Motion to allow temporary signage and material/equipment staging on the Ruffridge Johnson site prior to closing on the sale of the lot. For Clerk's Use: SUPPORTED DOCUMENTS ATTACHED Motion By: Resolution Ordinance Contract Minutes Plan Map Second By: Vote Record: A e Nay King Other(specify) None Love Paar Koski Montain Administration Department Use: Refer to: Consent Tabled Until: Regular Other: 23 CITY OF CENTERVILLE REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION entervi(Ce E77 Agenda Item# Department: Requested Council Meeting Date: Administration January 24, 2018 TITLE OF ISSUE: Amendment to Ord, #88, Second Series - 2018 Fee Schedule BACKGROUND AND SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION: Two changes are being proposed: -Water Meter Fees: Water meter material costs have increased, necessitating an adjustment in the water meter fee: Increases are 6%for a 3/4" meter(residential) ($411 to $436) and an increase of 7.25%for a 1" meter (commercial/industrial/irrigation) ($527 to $565). -Water Rates/Tier Structure: In an effort to address issues discussed at the City Council meeting, the proposed changes to the water rate/tier structure now provides a revenue neutral scenario (see attached revised fee schedule). Also attached are excerpts from city code, related to concerns with sodding/watering requirements. COST AND SOURCE(S) OF FUNDING: Meter fees as presented -No net cost to city. Water rates - Cost neutral to city. REQUESTED COUNCIL ACTION: Review at this time. Action will follow at a later date. For Clerk's Use: SUPPORTED DOCUMENTS ATTACHED Motion By: Resolution Ordinance Contract Minutes Plan Map Second By: X Vote Record: A e Nay King Other(specify) Worksheet- 2018 Water Meter Prices Love Paar Revised Fee Schedule Koski Montain Administration Department Use: Refer to: Consent Tabled Until: Regular Other: 24 EXHIBIT A UTILITY FEES,CHARGES AND OTHER COSTS Sewer Availability Charge.(SAC)(City)(Per Residential Equivalent Unit) ........ .......--...-......-....$2,300.00(§51.07) Sewer Availability Charge(SAC)(MCES)(Per Residential Equivalent Unit) ........... .........----...$7,483,011( 51,07) at Availability Charge(WAQ(PerResidential Equivalent,Unit)........,$1,850,00 1,€17) Water Lateral Benefit Fee(Unaesessed properties)....................................$6,500.00 Sanitary Sewer Lateral Benefit Fee(Unassessed properties) $8,100.00 Storm Water Area Charge(Developer's Agreement) 057139 per square foot(§5 Ll 1) Ccs mmerciabind ustrial.... ............................................................. ...$.07 per square foot of building, parking and other impervious surfaces Water/Sewer Permit Fees -51.07 Service/Connection(Includes 2 inspection trips to .....$75.00 Tapping Main-.-..... ............. ....... ....$50.00 Curb Stop Activation.,. ...... ....... .........$73.1111 Inspections(All)/each........ ....$40.00 � Servic ar a e Cas�h -�bleter Testing..... ................... ............................................. ....--cost Water- r '51.05 H -------------—deter Chane 3/4",Meter......... ....... .....................$411.00 1"Meter.... ....... .......--........--...........--$527,00 Minor Repairs.... ....... ............................ ......... ....,Cost+20% Special and other sizes... ...... ..............Cost plus liandl'ng (These Rates are Subject to Tax) Water Test Fee...................................... .......---....... ....... $6.36(7/1/06) WWater Use a Rates 51-02 'Residential Water System Management FeeRi-Monthly Billing Period,,......*....114,47 Variable- to Per Thousand Ga1mmvynr.(0- 000 )...................$1 Variable to Per-Thousand GaIIcars/Qtr.( 001- 0,01111)......$2.38 Variable Rate Tho rid Gallone/Qtr.( 001-XXX)-...--$2,71 Commercial Water System Management FeeiBi-Monthly Billing Period $14,85 Variable-Rate.Per Thousand Gallo Qtr,(0-500,000)--.......----$2, Variable-Rare Per Thousand GaIJonwQtr,(500,00 1-XXX)..............$2,71 Sower/Wastewater fee(hi-1--J ' Sewer Charges will include two componeum The first is as flat fee covering the City's head and variable costs for sewer collection(Collection Rate), The second fee is to cover the variable charge for wastewater treatment (Treatment Fee), The Treatment charge will be the Treatment Fee rate multiplied times the water meter we for the billing period. To account for summer irrigation water not being treated, the charge for the July and November billings shall not exceed the average use during the, first billing period of that year and the final billing period of the prior year (winter average). If the home is unoccupied during as significant part of the Page 7 of 17 25 WATER METERS PRICES - 2018 ....................................... 1111111111111.................................................. NEW HOME-1 #" WATER METER-RADIO READ/NEW METER STYLE 2017 %Change COST 3/4" IMPERL NITER-1 00 /T UCH PAD $140.00 FLEXNET 510 ENPOINT-RADIO READ EQUIP. $130.00 COPPER HORNS 3/4"meter w/7.5"lay length $48.50 3/4"SOLDER METER SWIVEL $&85 I"MALE IRON PIPE SWIVEL $8.75 40 FEET OF WIRE $9,-e5 SUBTOTAL T,3:i 73,3 0 PLUS 20%OVERHEAD/LABOR COST $6&66 SALESTAX $24,46 $411m00 6% NEW WATER METER I"-RADIO READ-NEW METER STYLE 2017 %Change COST 1"IMPERL MTER-1000 AVTOUCH PAD $189.00 FLEXPIET 510 EIRPOINT-RADIO READ EQUIP. $130.00 COPPER HORNS 1" $9&50 1"SOLDER METER SWIVEL (1" MPT Swivel) $9.00 1"MALE IRON PIPE SWIVEL (1"Solder Swivel) $9.00 40 FEET OF' IRE $9520 SUBTOTAL PLUS 20%OVERHEAD/LABOR COST $88,94 SALES TAX, 7.125% LLT L $545 EE $527.00 7.25% 26 (F) Water Supply Restrictions (1) Restricted hours for sprinkling. Lawn and garden watering is prohibited between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and :00 p.m. every year from May 1 through September I for all addresses on all days, This section shall apply only to those residents and water source is connected to the city water system. Use of private wells is exempt from this section. (a) New lawn sodand/or lawn seed is exempt for two weeks after installations residents may water both odd and even days with no watering from 10:00 a.m. to fie 00 p.m. ( ) Residents whose address ends in an even number may grater their lawns and gardens before 10.00 a.m. and after 6000 p.m. only on even-numbered days,and residents whose address ends in an odd number may water their lawns and gardens before 10:00 a.m. and. after 6000 p.m. only on odd-numbered days. (2) 'gator Supply Emergencies. In the event of emergencies affecting the City's ability to supply water as identified in the City"Water Emergency and Conservation Plan,"the City Administrator is authorized to implement water use restrictions and demand reduction measures as identified in such Plan. (G)Priv atefirre hose connections. Owners of structures with self-contained fire protection systems may apply for and obtain permission to connect the street mains with hydrants, large pipes,and hese couplings, for use in case of fire only,at their own installation expense and at such rates as the Council may adopt by resolution as herein.provided. (H)Opening hydrants. It is unlawful for any person, other than members of the fire Department or other person duly authorized by the city, in pursuance of lawful purpose,to opera any fire hydrant or attempt to draw grater from the same or in any manner interfere therewith. It is also unlawful for any person so authorized to deliver or suffer to be delivered to any other person any hydrant key or wrench,except for the purposes strictly pertaining to their lawful use. ( ) Temporary connection tofirre hydrants. A temporary connection to a fire hydrant may be made subject to a permit issued by the city. The permit shall indicate the hydrant to be used and none ether. The applicant shall pay a deposit to guarantee payment for the water used and for damage to the meter and hydrant,which shall be refunded upon expiration of the permit, less charges for water used and the cost of repair of damages, if any. The user shall relinquish the hydrant in case of emergency upon demand of the city. The user shall pay a rental charge as set by City Council resolution for each day including Sundays and legal holidays, and a fee as set by City Council resolution for each 1,000 gallons of water used. (J) Unmetered sice. Unmetered service may be prodded for construction, flooding skating rinks and any other purpose. The service shall be at a duly adopted rate. Where it is difficult or impossible to accurately measure the amount of grater taken,unmetered service may be prodded and the unmetered rate applied; provided, however,that by acceptance thereof the consumer agrees to have the city estimate the water used.. In so estimating,the city shall consider the use to which the water is put and the length of time of unmetered service. 81Page 27 (B)Sidewalks. Paved sidewalks five feet wide of Portland cement, concrete or asphalt concrete may be required on one or both sides of streets designated as collectors or arterials. (C)Storm drainage, The construction of a storm drainage system shall conform to the following requirements: (1) Drainage ditches or channels shall have a minimum gradient of one percent; (2) Open watercourses shall have adequate capacity and erosion control to ensure safe and healthful disposal of stormwater; (3) When topsoil has been removed from the surface of a lot on a slope he erosion will cause a displacement of loose material,the subdivider shall be required to seed or provide other means to prevent the wash from damaging adjacent property or accumulating on street surfaces; and (4) Design of storm drainage facilities shall be compatible with adjacent areas, including the extension of abutting existing storm sewers. Design of all drainage structures shall be based on the 5-year occurrence for design intensity using runoff coefficient and concentration times as determined by the City Engineer. (D)Water supply. Where public water supply is available, as determined by the Council,the subdivider shall connect to the public water supply and construct a system of water mains with a connection for each lot. The minimum size of water mains shall be six inches and the minimum size of private water services shall be one inch. Water mains and services for commercial and industrial uses or for the extension of major trunks shall be determined by the City Engineer. If private wells are to be permitted, they shall be constructed in conformance with City Code and Minnesota Statutes and Rules. (E)Sewers. All plats within the urban service area shall be connected to the municipal sewer system. (F) Utilities. Every lot in a subdivision shall be capable of being served by utilities, and easements acceptable to the utility companies shall be provided. Electric, gas and other utility distribution lines shall be installed within public rights-of-way or within properly designated easements.All utilities in new subdivisions shall be placed underground, To the fullest extent possible,underground utility lines shall be installed within the right-of-way adjacent to but not beneath existing and proposed paved areas. (G)Street name and trajfic control signs. In single-and multiple-family developments,the developer shall install all street name signs and traffic control signs as deemed necessary by the City Engineer. In commercial and industrial developments,the developer shall install all street names signs and traffic control signs as deemed necessary by the City Engineer. (H)Sodding. The developer must sod the front yard, boulevard and side yards to the rear of the structure on every lot-the balance of the lot shall be seeded. The required sodding and seeding shall be placed prior to occupancy. An escrow deposit shall be submitted to the city in a dollar amount sufficient to guarantee the required sodding. Hydro-seeding may be substituted for sod subject to: 1)Two rows of sod shall be placed along the curb and any other adjoining pavements,erosion control as approved by the Building Official shall be placed at the property lines and next to water features,and 2)the site 282 1 Pagi 28 deposit shall be retained until the vegetation is fully established. This shall not prevent a developer from establishing lot covenants requiring so, in which case this substitution shall not be allowed. Ord. 2d, #41.Amended 1212212010 153.45 PLANNED MANUFACTURED ROME DEVELOPMENTS. The following requirements shall apply only to manufactured home developments,parks and/or cooperatives of a common owner(s)or ownership scheme, and/or which construct shared facilities.All other of aspects of this chapter shall still apply. Operation of a planned manufacture home development is subject to the continuing licensing requirements of Minnesota Statutes Chapter 327. Loss of this license is deemed a revocation of any conditional or interim use permit granted by the City for the planned manufactured home development, All planned manufactured home developments shall include the following: (A)An off-street parking area of at least 440 square feet shall be provided for each manufactured home. The parking area surface shall be of animpervious construction. No on-street parking will be permitted in the planned manufactured home development. (B)A utility enclosure having a minimum of ten feet by ten feet shall be provided by operator and placed uniformly on each lot designated for a manufactured home. (C)The operator shall construct a screened,common storage area.All boats, boat trailers, hauling trailers and all other equipment not stored within a manufactured home or the utility enclosure shall be stored in this separate area provided by the operator.As a condition of operation of the development these items shall not be stored upon a lot designated for any manufactured home nor upon the streets within the planned manufactured home development. (Ll ere shall be no exterior radio,television or satellite antennas except for a community-type antenna for the use of all residents of the planned manufactured home development. (E)Common overflow parking lona) (other than on-lot parking)shall be constructed in the planned manufactured home development equal to a minimum of one space for each three manufactured homes, (F) There shall be no retail sales of manufactured homes or accessories thereto in the limits of the planned manufactured home development, (G)Each planned manufactured home development shall contain one or more enclosed facility building(s) with space devoted to offices, storm shelter, laundry and recreational facilities. The building shall be so designed so as to provide at least 12 square feet of space per manufactured home lot,but in no case shall the building be less than 2,500 square feet. (H)Each planned manufactured home development shall create an operational plan. This plan shall address at least the following: 283 1 P a g e 29 (C)Location. The Public Works Director shall produce a mailbox location plan for the city and designate group mailbox locations, Residents replacing existing mailboxes will check with City Hall for the new group box locations. (D)Handicapped and elderlypersons. Any handicapped or elderly person who would have difficulty using a group box location shall be exempt from this section upon notification of handicap or physical condition to the City Hall, (E)Removal ofpaper boxesfirom the right-of-way. As of 8-1-1990, all paper boxes not in group locations will be removed from the city street right-of-way. (F) Cul-de-sac. Group mailbox and paper box stands shall not be located in any cul-de-sac. Box locations will be allowed on streets entering and leaving the cul-de-sac. (G)Now developments. Developer agreements shall provide for installation of mailboxes in new developments, (H)Maintenance. Maintenance of the mailboxes and platforms shall be the responsibility of the residents served. Penalty, see § 93.99 Ord. #48, adopted 0512411989 §93.04 MAINTENANCE OF ADJOINING RIGHT OF WAY. (A)Duty ofArip serty Owners to Cut Grass and Weeds and Maintain Trees and Shrubs. Every owner of property abutting on any street shall cause the grass and weeds to be cut from the line of such property nearest to such street to the center of such street. If the grass or weeds in such a place attain a height in excess of eight(8) inches it shall be prima facie evidence of a failure to comply with this Section.Every owner of property abutting on any street shall subject to the provisions herein requiring a permit therefor trim cut and otherwise maintain all trees and shrubs in unhazardous and healthy condition from the line of such property nearest to such street to the center thereof. (B)Failure of Owner, If the owner of the abutting property fails to maintain adjoining right of way as required by this section,the city may secure compliance in the same manner as abatement of nuisance violations and may order such work to be done under its direction and the cost thereof assessed to the abutting property owner as any other special assessment. Ord. 2d#15, amended 1011112006 § 93.15 ELECTION TO MANAGE. 1161 P 30 CITY OF CENTERVILLE REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION entervi(Ce E77 Agenda Item# Department: Requested Council Meeting Date: Administration/Engineering January 24, 2018 TITLE OF ISSUE: Downtown Water Main Community Development Block Grant BACKGROUND AND SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION: The application for a Community Development Block Grant requires a resolution of support for the application, from the City Council. Previously, the Council had only given, informal, consensus support. Attached is a formal resolution. COST AND SOURCE(S) OF FUNDING: Grant application is for $450,000 to cover water main & services. Project estimate is $1,350,000, incl. streets. REQUESTED COUNCIL ACTION: Motion to support Resolution 18-00X, supporting application to Anoka County for Community Development Block Grant funding, for the Downtown Watermain project. For Clerk's Use: SUPPORTED DOCUMENTS ATTACHED Motion By: Resolution Ordinance Contract Minutes Plan Map Second By: X Vote Record: A e Nay King Other(specify) Love Paar Koski Montain Administration Department Use: Refer to: Consent Tabled Until: Regular Other: 31 STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF ANOKA CITY OF CENTERVILLE RES. #18-0 A RESOLUTION OF SPONSORSHIP OF THE ATTACHED COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT APPLICATION WHEREAS, the City has identified a need to connect all properties in the City to municipal water, and WHEREAS, certain properties are owned by persons for which the cost to connect would be a significant burden and for some may be unaffordable and WHEREAS, Community Development Block Grant funds may be available to provide financial assistance to connect homes of eligible families to city water. NOW THEREFORE BE RESOLVED by the City Council of Centerville, Minnesota: 1) That the City of Centerville acts as the legal sponsor for project(s) contained in the Anoka County Community Development Block Grant Application and city staff is authorized to submit the application and any additional supporting information and data necessary. 2) That the City of Centerville has the legal authority to apply for financial assistance and the institutional, managerial, and financial capacity to ensure adequate construction, operation, maintenance and replacement of the proposed project for its design life. 3) That the City of Centerville has not incurred any costs, has not entered into any written agreements to purchase property. 4) That the City of Centerville has not violated any Federal, State, or local laws pertaining to fraud, bribery, gifts, kickbacks, collusions, conflict of interest or other unlawful or corrupt practice. 5) That upon approval of its application by the state, City of Centerville may enter into an agreement with the Anoka County for the above-referenced project(s) and that the City of Centerville certifies that it will comply with all applicable laws and regulations as stated in all contract agreements. 6) That Mayor and Clerk are hereby authorized to execute such agreements, and amendments thereof as are necessary to implement the project(s) on behalf of the applicant. Adopted by the City Council of Centerville on January 24, 2018. 32 Jeff Paar, Mayor Attest: Teresa Bender, City Clerk 33 CITY OF CENTERVILLE REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION entervi(Ce E77 Agenda Item# Department: Requested Council Meeting Date: Engineering/Public Works January 24, 2018 TITLE OF ISSUE: Local Water Plan Review BACKGROUND AND SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION: State statute 10313.235 requires the development of a Local Water Plan, which is to, then, be sent to the local watershed management organization and the Metropolitan Council for review and comment. Our engineering consultant, Stantec, will be on hand to present a summary of the plan and answer any questions. COST AND SOURCE(S) OF FUNDING: $24,000 previously committed from the Stormwater Utility Fund for the creation of the Local Water Plan. REQUESTED COUNCIL ACTION: Given the size and scope of this document, we are not asking for adoption of the plan at this time. Please take time to review the plan. Comments can be sent directly to the City Engineer. If there are significant comments, we will address those or bring them to Council for discussion. Staff will, then, ask for authorization to distribute the plan to RCWD and Met Council at a future date, prior to June 1, 2018. For Clerk's Use: SUPPORTED DOCUMENTS ATTACHED Motion By: Resolution Ordinance Contract Minutes Plan Map Second By: Vote Record: A e Nay King Other(specify) Local Water Plan (Draft) Love Paar Koski Montain Administration Department Use: Refer to: Consent Tabled Until: Regular Other: 34 0 Stantec Centerville Local Water Plan City of Centerville 2018 Project Number: 193803961 35 Stantec CITY OF CENTERVILLE -2018 LOCAL WATER PLAN Table of Contents 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY..................................................................................................1.1 2.0 INTRODUCTION ..............................................................................................................2.3 2.1 AUTHORIZATION.............................................................................................................2.3 2.2 PURPOSE OF THE PLAN ................................................................................................2.3 2.3 SCOPE 2.3 3.0 PHYSICAL ENVIRONMENT.............................................................................................3.5 3.1 LOCATION AND HISTORY ..............................................................................................3.5 3.2 GEOLOGY AND TOPOGRAPHY......................................................................................3.5 3.3 SOIL CHARACTERISTICS ...............................................................................................3.5 3.4 CLIMATE ..........................................................................................................................3.6 3.5 LAKES AND OTHER SIGNIFICANT WATERBODIES......................................................3.7 3.6 WETLANDS......................................................................................................................3.8 3.7 LAND USE........................................................................................................................3.9 3.8 UTILITY SYSTEMS...........................................................................................................3.9 3.9 UNIQUE AREAS.............................................................................................................3.10 3.10ZONING AND FLOODPLAIN MANAGEMENT................................................................3.10 3.11SHORELAND AND BUFFER ZONES.............................................................................3.11 3.12GROUNDWATER CHARACTERISTICS.........................................................................3.11 4.0 HYDROLOGIC CALCULATIONS/MODELING PARAMETERS.....................................4.13 4.1 WATER QUANTITY........................................................................................................4.13 4.2 NURP STANDARDS.......................................................................................................4.14 5.0 WATER RESOURCE MANAGEMENT OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES..........................5.15 5.1 BACKGROUND ..............................................................................................................5.15 5.2 OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES........................................................................................5.15 6.0 WATER RESOURCE MANAGEMENT PLAN ................................................................6.20 6.1 STORMWATER MANAGEMENT AND MAINTENANCE.................................................6.20 6.2 SUPPORT OF RCWD PROGRAMS AND EXISTING AGREEMENTS............................6.22 6.3 PHASE II NPDES MS4 PERMIT AND SWPPP...............................................................6.22 6.4 TOTAL MAXIMUM DAILY LOAD (TMDL) STUDIES .......................................................6.23 6.5 STORMWATER RUNOFF RATE CONTROL..................................................................6.23 6.6 MANAGEMENT OF CLEARWATER CREEK DITCH SYSTEM.......................................6.23 6.7 INTERCOMMUNITY FLOWS..........................................................................................6.23 6.8 EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL .........................................................................6.24 6.9 WETLAND MANAGEMENT............................................................................................6.25 6.10FLOODPLAIN ADMINISTRATION ..................................................................................6.25 i 36 l Stantec CITY OF CENTERVILLE -2018 LOCAL WATER PLAN 6.11SHORELAND REGULATION..........................................................................................6.26 6.12PUBLIC PARTICIPATION...............................................................................................6.26 7.0 IMPLEMENTATION PROGRAM ....................................................................................7.27 7.1 ADMINISTRATION RESPONSIBILITY AND IMPROVEMENT PLAN..............................7.27 7.2 FINANCING OF MANAGEMENT PROGRAMS ..............................................................7.27 7.3 PUBLIC PARTICIPATION THROUGH INFORMATION AND EDUCATION ....................7.28 7.4 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN SUMMARY..............................................................7.28 8.0 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN ................................................................................8.29 8.1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................8.29 8.2 COMPLETED CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS...................................................8.29 8.3 FUTURE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS...........................................................8.30 9.0 STORMWATER CHARGES ...........................................................................................9.32 10.OAMENDMENT PROCESS ............................................................................................10.34 10.1 REVIEW AND ADOPTION PROCESS..........................................................................10.34 10.2AMENDMENTS TO PLAN AND FUTURE UPDATES...................................................10.34 ii 37 l Stantec CITY OF CENTERVILLE -2018 LOCAL WATER PLAN APPENDIX Figures FIGURE 1 Location Map FIGURE 2 USGS Topographic Map FIGURE 3 NRCS Soils Map FIGURE 4 NWI (National Wetlands Inventory) Map FIGURE 5 MLCCS Land Cover Map FIGURE 6 Existing Land Use (City of Centerville 2040 Comprehensive Plan) Map FIGURE 7 Future Land Use (City of Centerville 2040 Comprehensive Plan) Map FIGURE 8 Official Zoning Map FIGURE 9 Floodplain Map FIGURE 10 Storm Sewer Map FIGURE 11 Capital Improvement Plan Map Reports and City Ordinances Peltier and Centerville Lakes TMDL Report: Nutrient TMDL Report Lino Lakes Chain of Lakes TMDL Report: Nutrient TMDL Report City Code Chapter 155: Flood Damage Prevention City Code Chapter 156, Section 133: Special Provisions Related to Development or Building on Lands within 100 Feet of Centerville Lake, Peltier Lake, or Clearwater Creek City Code Chapter 157: Erosion Control Intercommunity Flows: Intercommunity Flows per RCWD District-Wide Model 38 l Stantec CITY OF CENTERVILLE -2018 LOCAL WATER PLAN 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The City of Centerville, located completely within the Rice Creek Watershed District (RCWD), is a largely residential community of 2.4 square miles. Roughly 85% of the City is developed. Although complete development in the comprehensive plan is proposed to be staged over the next 20 years, the market forces that drive development are difficult to forecast. Because of the new development and redevelopment that could occur in Centerville, the management priorities of the City have focused on issues surrounding development, such as installation of proper detention facilities, erosion and sediment control of new construction sites, providing adequate storm sewer capacity, and meeting water quality requirements. The primary control of land uses within Centerville is determined by the City, however the RCWD will work with the City to review permit land development permits, as well as road, trail, utility construction and reconstruction. The RCWD has regulatory authority to enforce its goals and policies in order to ensure water quality throughout the City. Below is a summary of all the chapters contained in this report: 2.0 INTRODUCTION — Includes information about authorization and discusses the purpose of the plan. 3.0 PHYSICAL ENVIRONMENT— Contains information about location, geology, topography, soils, climate, waterbodies, land use, utility systems, and unique areas. 4.0 HYDROLOGIC CALCULATIONS/MODELING PARAMETERS—Discusses the required parameters to be used in calculations and/or modeling done to determine compliance with stormwater runoff rate controls or National Urban Runoff Program (NURP) pond guidelines. 5.0 WATER RESOURCE MANAGEMENT OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES— Includes a description of all the objectives and associated policies to be adopted as part of the local water plan. 6.0 WATER RESOURCE MANAGEMENT PLAN —Provides specific information as to the proposed management method and framework to meet the objectives and policies outlined in Chapter 5. 7.0 IMPLEMENTATION PROGRAM —Provides information as to the practical method for implementing the programs discussed in Chapter 6. 8.0 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN — Describes capital improvement projects involving the storm sewer system and provides cost estimates for each. 1.1 39 Stantec CITY OF CENTERVILLE -2018 LOCAL WATER PLAN EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 9.0 STORMWATER CHARGES — Summarizes the current stormwater fee structure. 10.0 AMENDMENT PROCESS — Describes the procedures involved in updating the plan using amendments. 1.2 40 Stantec CITY OF CENTERVILLE -2018 LOCAL WATER PLAN INTRODUCTION 2.0 INTRODUCTION 2.1 AUTHORIZATION On May 10, 2017, the Centerville City Council authorized the preparation of a local water plan (LWP) update to the previous 2012 surface water management plan (SWMP). Local water plans will supplant surface water management plans; besides the change of name, these documents serve the same purpose as a framework to manage the water resources within the City of Centerville. The LWP is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan update for the City of Centerville as well as the Watershed Management Plan and rules of the Rice Creek Watershed District. Previously, the updates to the Local Water Plan and Comprehensive Plan were asynchronous, but beginning with this 2018 Local Water Plan update, the Plan will be part of the Comprehensive Plan and the two will be updated simultaneously. 2.2 PURPOSE OF THE PLAN This Local Water Plan will serve as a comprehensive planning document to guide the City of Centerville in conserving, protecting and managing its surface water resources. This plan has been created to meet the requirements detailed in Minnesota Statutes 103B and Minnesota Rules 8410, administered by the Board of Water and Soil Resources (BWSR). This plan is also consistent with the goals and policies of the Metropolitan Council's 2040 Water Resources Policy Plan, and the watershed district having authority within the City, the Rice Creek Watershed District (RCWD). This plan may be periodically amended to remain current with local practices and policies. The intent of the legislated statute is to give the responsibility for water management to the local units of government. The State and the Metropolitan Council have only minimal oversight roles in watershed management or plan implementation. 2.3 SCOPE This Plan serves multiple purposes including statutory and rule compliance. Minnesota Statute 103B.235 defines content for local water plans. According to the statute's text, each local plan, in degree of detail required in the watershed plan, shall: (1) describe existing and proposed physical environment and land use; (2) define drainage areas and volumes, rates, and paths of stormwater runoff; (3) identify areas and elevations for stormwater storage adequate to meet performance standards established in the watershed plan; (4) identify regulated areas; and (5) set forth an implementation program, including a description of official controls, and as appropriate, a capital improvement program. 2.3 41 Stantec CITY OF CENTERVILLE -2018 LOCAL WATER PLAN INTRODUCTION Minnesota Rules 8410, administered by the Board of Water and Soil Resources, provide more detail on local plan content. Though the BWSR guidance applies specifically to watershed management organizations and watershed districts, this guidance has historically been used to frame expectations for municipal plans. According to Rules 8410, local plans must provide or address: (1) Executive summary (2) Land and water resource inventory (3) Impact on other units of government (4) Establishment of goals and policies (5) Assessment of problems (6) Implementation program (7) Implementation priorities (8) Plan contents; amendments (9) Annual reporting requirements 2.4 42 Stantec CITY OF CENTERVILLE -2018 LOCAL WATER PLAN PHYSICAL ENVIRONMENT 3.0 PHYSICAL ENVIRONMENT 3.1 LOCATION AND HISTORY The City of Centerville is situated in the southeast region of Anoka County, Minnesota. Figure 1 illustrates where the City is situated within the Twin Cities seven-county metro area. The City is adjacent to Centerville Lake and Peltier Lake and is surrounded by the City of Lino Lakes. Its proximity to Minneapolis and St. Paul makes Centerville a convenient residential location. Residents and businesses have easy access to Interstates 35E. Location and access will continue to keep Centerville's business and residential population stable. Historical population and population projections are shown in Table 3.1. TABLE 3.1 -CENTERVILLE POPULATION 2010 3,792 1,315 2020 3,840 1,400 2030 3,930 1,450 2040 4,060 1,500 Source: Metropolitan Council 2040 Water Resources Policy Plan 3.2 GEOLOGY AND TOPOGRAPHY The City is in the northern portion of the Rice Creek Watershed District. The land is generally flat with major drainageways and creeks discharging into Peltier and Centerville Lakes. The ground elevation in the City ranges from approximately 912 feet to 886 feet NGVD, with the lowest areas located near the lakes. The USGS topographic map for the area is provided in Figure 2. 3.3 SOIL CHARACTERISTICS The NRCS Soil Survey of Anoka County indicates that soils in the area are mostly of the Nessel-Dundas-Webster association — nearly level to gently-sloping, moderately well-drained and poorly-drained soils formed in loamy glacial till. The water table is noted as seasonally high in most of the soil types listed for this area. The soil survey shows several divisions of soil types within the City. The Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) has established a series of soil groups based on infiltration rates of the soil: 3.5 43 Stantec CITY OF CENTERVILLE -2018 LOCAL WATER PLAN PHYSICAL ENVIRONMENT HYDROLOGIC SOIL GROUP A - Low runoff potential, high infiltration rate HYDROLOGIC SOIL GROUP B - Moderate infiltration rate HYDROLOGIC SOIL GROUP C - Slow infiltration rate HYDROLOGIC SOIL GROUP D - Very slow infiltration rate, high runoff potential The runoff potential of an area is determined using these general soil characteristics in combination with land use classification, vegetation of the area, and rainfall intensities as determined from various design storms. As illustrated in Figure 3, the City contains a wide geographic variability of hydrologic soil groups, with most the City being in the B and C categories. 3.4 CLIMATE Centerville has a climate that is fairly uniform. Summers are warm, with a mean temperature of 70.7degrees in June, July, and August. Winters are cold, having a mean December, January, and February temperature of 16.8 degrees. About 70% of the precipitation occurs in the period of April through September. The yearly precipitation total is 27.9 inches. Climate data for the Twin Cities are published by the National Weather Service (NWS) station at Chanhassen, MN. The NWS is a branch of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). Table 3.2 provides a summary of average precipitation data for the Twin Cities. TABLE 3.2-AVERAGE MONTHLY PRECIPITATION, 1971-2016 .................. inches 0.89 0.84 1.79 2.67 13.46 4.52 13.85 4.15 12.79 2.24 11.71 1.12 30.03 Rainfall frequency estimates are used as design tools in water resource projects. Rainfall frequencies are summarized in the National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration's (NOAA) Atlas 14-Point Precipitation Frequency Estimates. Previously, Technical Paper No. 40 (TP-40) Rainfall Frequency Atlas of the United States (NOAA) (published in 1961) was used to determine rainfall frequency estimates. TP-40 was developed using available rainfall information from far fewer stations than exist today; in Minnesota, there are 110 daily observation stations used in TP-40 estimates, whereas there are 320 daily observation stations used in Atlas 14. In addition to the fact that Atlas 14 estimates rely on a denser data network than TP-40, the stations have a longer period of record, and regional frequency analyses and new spatial interpolation techniques are used in the Atlas 14 method. Table 3.3 lists rainfall frequencies from Atlas 14 estimates, for the Twin Cities area, applicable to the City of Centerville. The data 3.6 44 Stantec CITY OF CENTERVILLE -2018 LOCAL WATER PLAN PHYSICAL ENVIRONMENT taken from Atlas 14 are solely based on historical rainfall events and is not an extrapolation of data trends to predict future events. TABLE 3.3-24-HOUR RAINFALL DEPTHS AND FREQUENCY 2 2.8 2.8 5 3.5 3.5 10 4.2 4.2 50 5.3 6.2 100 5.9 7.2 3.5 LAKES AND OTHER SIGNIFICANT WATERBODIES There are several waterbodies in the City. Peltier Lake and Centerville Lake are both located partially within the City and mostly in Lino Lakes. Clearwater Creek (Anoka-Washington Judicial Ditch 3) flows west and then north through the City to Peltier Lake. Anoka County Ditch 55 flows southwesterly through the City to Clearwater Creek. A private ditch flows northeasterly through the City to Clearwater Creek. Peltier Lake has a surface area of approximately 579 acres with a maximum depth of 18 feet. Water quality data has been recorded for some parameters since 1974. Centerville Lake is approximately 474 acres in surface area with a maximum depth of approximately 19 feet. Water quality data on Centerville Lake has been recorded since 1980. Centerville Lake has regional use for fishing and boating. As shown in Table 3.4, there are two Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (MnDNR) Protected Waters in the City. These include a portion of Centerville Lake, designated as 02000600, and a portion of Peltier Lake, designated as 02000400. Also included under MnDNR authority are three protected wetlands as discussed in the next section. TABLE 3.4- MNDNR PROTECTED WATERS WITHIN THE CITY OF CENTERVILLE Centerville Lake 02000600 885.0 Peltier Lake 02000400 884.7 3.7 45 Stantec CITY OF CENTERVILLE -2018 LOCAL WATER PLAN PHYSICAL ENVIRONMENT 3.6 WETLANDS The Wetland Conservation Act (WCA) was passed in 1991 to maintain and protect wetland areas throughout the State of Minnesota. The WCA creates a "not net loss policy" so that there are mitigation measures for drained or filled wetlands. The Act also established that local government units (LGUs) would have administrative responsibility for the implementation of the WCA. The LGU responsible for administrative responsibility relating to the WCA for the City of Centerville is RCWD. The contact at RCWD is Nick Tomczik, whose contact information is listed below: Rice Creek Watershed District Nick Tomczik, Permit Coordinator/Wetland Specialist 4325 Pheasant Ridge Drive NE, Suite 611 Blaine, MN 55449 (763) 398-3079 Wetlands in the City are derived from the National Wetlands Inventory (USFWS, 2017) and are shown in Figure 4. Wetlands are a significant portion of the natural features found in Centerville. Table 3.5 lists the MnDNR Public Waters Wetlands located within the City. Figure 4 shows the location and boundaries of the Public Waters Wetlands, which are obtained from the MnDNR Geospatial Commons: https://gisdata.mn.gov/. TABLE 3.5-MNDNR PUBLIC WATERS WETLANDS WITHIN THE CITY OF CENTERVILLE Wetland—Northeast corner of City 545W Wetland—Across County Highway 14 from Centerville Lake 546W Wetland—Southwest corner of City 554W It is essential to note that these boundaries are only approximate and do not replace a wetland delineation. The MnDNR, the RCWD, and the US Army Corps of Engineers should be contacted if work in or near wetlands is anticipated. Any construction activity that may impact wetlands may require permits from the RCWD, the US Army Corps of Engineers, and/or MnDNR. Correspondence regarding any wetland impacts should be directed to the following: MN Dept. of Natural Resources US Army Corps of Engineers Jason Speigel, Area Hydrologist Andy Beaudet, Anoka County Point of Contact 1200 Warner Road St. Paul District, 180 5th Street E., Suite 700 St. Paul, MN 55106 St. Paul, MN 55101-1678 (651) 259-5822 (651) 290-5642 3.8 46 Stantec CITY OF CENTERVILLE -2018 LOCAL WATER PLAN PHYSICAL ENVIRONMENT Rice Creek Watershed District Nick Tomczik, Permit Coordinator/Wetland Specialist 4325 Pheasant Ridge Drive NE, Suite 611 Blaine, MN 55449 (763) 398-3079 3.7 LAND USE Figure 5 illustrates land cover within the City, based on the MnDNR's Minnesota Land Cover Classification System (MLCCS). The City is predominantly a residential community. Changes in land use are anticipated in the future as construction of high and medium density or single family residential development continues. The City's comprehensive plan lays out these proposed areas for development or redevelopment. Of note, is the City's plan to redevelop the downtown area with a mixed use (retail and high density housing) style project. This plan will likely be revisited with the 2018 comprehensive plan update. Figure 6 shows existing land use within the City. Figure 7 shows 2030 future land use within the City. These figures are taken directly from Figures 8 and 15, respectively, of the Centerville 2040 Comprehensive Plan. There are a few small areas that are expected to develop as residential in the future, particularly in the southern portion of the City. Additionally, the City has constructed an industrial park in the east central part of the city which will most likely build out in the near future. 3.8 UTILITY SYSTEMS The public utilities within the City include the storm sewer, sanitary sewer, and water system. The Metropolitan Council Environmental Service (MCES) public sanitary sewer system services all of the developed portion of the City. There are a few scattered acreage style lots (11) and two commercial/industrial sites which remain on Individual Sewage Treatment Systems (ISTS). Proposed maintenance and inspection of these systems is addressed in Chapter 6. City code requires connection to the municipal system with any redevelopment proposal. The water distribution system now services most the developed part of the community. The remaining neighborhoods are scheduled for connection to City water when their streets need major repair. These neighborhoods include LaValle Drive and portions of the downtown area. Scattered lots in neighborhoods served by City water remain unconnected. The city is working on policies to encourage hook-up to the municipal water system with a goal of all city residents being connected. There are approximately 1,265 water connections to the watermain system as of December 2017, which includes residential as well as commercial, industrial, and institutional. The remainder of the City is serviced by private wells, which totals approximately 147, down from 255 in 2012, and 360 in 2004. These numbers were compiled from City utility billing records. The water system for the City of Centerville includes one water tower, two wells, and a controlled interconnection with the City of Lino Lakes' system. The surface water drainage system includes street gutters, storm sewers, culverts, swales, channels, marshes, ponds, 3.9 47 Stantec CITY OF CENTERVILLE -2018 LOCAL WATER PLAN PHYSICAL ENVIRONMENT lakes, etc. Recent development in the City has incorporated the natural drainage patterns of the land whenever possible. However, since the area is very flat, detention ponds were created in many developments to control runoff. 3.9 UNIQUE AREAS The Rice Creek Chain of Lakes Park Reserve is in the northwest corner of the City. Accounting for approximately 10% of the area of the City, 149 of the 5,500 acres of the park are located within Centerville city limits. The park has many recreational facilities including picnic areas, boat and canoe launches, fishing piers, campgrounds, a nature center, a heritage lab, a prairie restoration project, cross country ski trails, a swimming beach, a playground, and a golf course. The Metropolitan Council's classification as a regional park requires that 80% of the park remain in its natural state. 3.10 ZONING AND FLOODPLAIN MANAGEMENT As part of the comprehensive planning process, the City adopted a Future Land Use Plan (Figure 7). By law, the City is required to change zoning to match the 2040 Future Land Use Plan within one year of the adoption of the Comprehensive Plan. This will take place after the Plan has been reviewed and adopted in 2018.The City has adopted the 2030 Comprehensive Plan and updated their zoning map (Figure 8) to match future land uses. This is not to say that the Official Zoning Map reflects the existing land use. The Existing Land Use Map is shown in Figure 6. Figures 6 and 7 are taken directly from the Centerville 2040 Comprehensive Plan; Figure 8 is the adopted Official Zoning Map. There is no current plan to further alter zoning within the City. The zoning ordinance now classifies land use into ten categories: Rural Residential (R-1), High-Density Single-Family Residential (R-2A), Single-Family Residential (R- 2), Single-Family Manufactured Housing (R-4), Single Family Residential-Estate (R-5), Commercial (B-1), Industrial Park (1-1), Public/Institutional (P-1), Mixed Use (M-1), Mixed Use Neighborhood District (M-2). Higher density uses, such as business and industrial areas, tend to have larger impervious surface coverage, impacting stormwater management. New planned unit developments are subject to water protection regulations including the protection of existing waterbodies and wetlands and dedicating at least 20% of project area to open space (City Code 156.200). The zoning ordinance also regulates shoreland activities; the governance of these zones is described in more detail in the following section (3.11 Shoreland and Buffer Zones). Figure 9 delineates the approximate floodplain and floodway boundaries within the City. The City initiated the Floodplain Reduction Project along Clearwater Creek in 1989. This project involved the investment of significant resources to reduce flooding potential along Clearwater Creek. Following completion of the project, a Clearwater Creek flood study was conducted and a Letter of Map Revision (LOMR) was subsequently approved by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) in October 1997. As a result, the Flood Insurance Study (FIS), Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM), and the Flood Boundary and Floodway Map (FBFM) for the City were revised. These references should be consulted for more complete and detailed 3.10 48 Stantec CITY OF CENTERVILLE -2018 LOCAL WATER PLAN PHYSICAL ENVIRONMENT information on the floodplain and floodway areas. The current FEMA map is dated December 16, 2015. The Federal Emergency Management Administration has recently acquired more accurate, digitized mapping data and has sent copies of a revised FIRM to cities for review. Centerville submitted several comments regarding areas which have been excluded from the floodplain via LOMA-Fs and other methods. However, the resubmitted map did not show these areas out of the floodplain. This map approval process is still in progress at the time of this report. 3.11 SHORELAND AND BUFFER ZONES Minnesota's Buffer Law establishes a requirement for lands adjacent to lakes, rivers, streams, and ditches, to have a buffer consisting of perennial vegetation. This buffer must be at least 16.5 feet wide for ditches, and 50 feet for lakes, rivers, and streams. The purpose of the Minnesota Buffer Law is to filter out phosphorus, nitrogen, and sediment. Buffers for public waters (lakes, rivers, and streams) had to have been implemented by November 1, 2017, while buffers for ditches need to be implemented by November 1, 2018. Local Soil Water Conservation Districts (SWCDs) are responsible for working with landowners to ensure that the Buffer Law is met. The SWCD for Centerville is Anoka Conservation District (ACD). The contact at ACD for Buffer Law implementation is Jared Wagner, whose contact information is listed below: Jared Wagner, Water Resource Technician Anoka Conservation District 1318 McKay Dr NE, Suite 300 Ham Lake, MN 55304 (763) 434-2030 x18 The City of Centerville's City Code (Chapter 156.133, Part B) discusses shoreland ordinances and special provisions relating to development within shoreland areas. The Ordinance contains provisions regulating lot size, setbacks, grading, and vegetative alterations. Centerville's Code specifies that buildings must be set back at least 75 feet from the ordinary high water level for lands that adjoin a lake. Furthermore, there is a setback requirement for Clearwater Creek of at least 100 feet from the ordinary high water level. Because the City of Centerville has a shoreland ordinance that is more stringent than the State's Buffer Law, parcels that are identified on the DNR Buffer Map Viewing Application as lands that need buffers are already compliant. These rules were verified with ACD, who will identify individual landowners if their parcels are non-compliant with the Buffer Law. 3.12 GROUNDWATER CHARACTERISTICS Information on the City's geologic and groundwater characteristics, including geologic features, groundwater sensitivity, groundwater discharge and recharge areas, and the influence of land 3.11 49 Stantec CITY OF CENTERVILLE -2018 LOCAL WATER PLAN PHYSICAL ENVIRONMENT use on groundwater can be found in the City's Wellhead Protection Plan, adopted in December 2007. A copy of this plan can be obtained at City Hall. The plan contains information which the City views as security-sensitive; consequently, the full Wellhead Protection Plan is not available online, but the action steps that the City of Centerville is taking to protect its groundwater supply are discussed below. These action steps include: • Implementing a public education program: Centerville will implement both a Wellhead Protection Awareness Project, which will help residents and business owners be involved in wellhead protection efforts, as well as a Hazardous Materials Management Education Project, where residents and business owners will learn how to use, store and dispose of hazardous materials within the DWSMAs through environmental education programs. • Managing wells: The City will seal abandoned wells within DWSMAs, and work with MDH to monitor/maintain construction records of wells within the City. • Monitoring contaminant sources: The City will track potential contaminants within the DWSMA. • Utilizing existing land use and development programs: The City will work with planning and zoning authorities to change controls so that drinking wells are protected. The City will also consult the Wellhead Protection Plan when it updates the Local Water Plan (this document) and the Comprehensive Plan. • Ensuring adequate water quantity and quality: As part of the Wellhead Protection Plan, Centerville will monitor aquifer chemistry and minimize groundwater use by imposing water conservation measures. As discussed in the Wellhead Protection Report, the City will evaluate progress of the Plan by preparing an internal progress report for the above action items. Progress reports will be prepared every 2.5 years at a minimum. This report will include updates to the Potential Contaminant Source Inventory, summarize water quality data and water demands, and among other updates, will present information on future actions to meet Wellhead Protection Plan goals and objectives. 3.12 50 Stantec CITY OF CENTERVILLE -2018 LOCAL WATER PLAN HYDROLOGIC CALCULATIONS/MODELING PARAMETERS 4.0 HYDROLOGIC CALCULATIONS/MODELING PARAMETERS 4.1 WATER QUANTITY As stated in Chapter 6, rate control must be provided within each development that maintains existing runoff conditions for the 2-year, 10-year, and 100-year storm events. For each proposed development, supporting calculations or modeling must be submitted. The calculations or modeling shall be based on NRCS methods. The parameters for the calculations or modeling shall be as follows: NRCS 24-HOUR Type II design storms based on NOAA Atlas 14 Precipitation Estimates for Centerville, MN: 1-year storm = 2.4" 10-year storm = 4.2" 100-year storm =7.2" Previously, Technical Paper 40 estimates were: 1-year storm = 2.4" 10-year storm = 4.2" 100-year storm = 5.9" As discussed in Section 3.4 (Climate), the state of Minnesota and watershed districts now require use of Atlas 14-Point Precipitation Frequency estimates. Previously, Technical Paper No. 40 (TP-40) estimates were used. NOAA Atlas 14 data uses more precipitation stations in its statistical analysis, includes additional precipitation records, and uses a more robust statistical analysis to determine rainfall estimates. Both TP-40 and Atlas 14 datasets are based on historical rainfall events and do not extrapolate to predict future events. In addition to analyzing the 2-year, 10-year and 100-year storm events, the 10-day snowmelt (Curve Number 100) must be used. According to RCWD requirements, analyzing the 10-day snowmelt event is not required for stormwater management detention basins with a defined outlet elevation at or below the 100-year return period, 24-hour rainfall event elevation. To analyze stormwater runoff for the design of discharge and water levels within and from the project site, a hydrograph method, or program based on NRCS Technical Release #20, must be used. Pervious and impervious areas in the model must be modeled separately. 4.13 51 Stantec CITY OF CENTERVILLE -2018 LOCAL WATER PLAN HYDROLOGIC CALCULATIONS/MODELING PARAMETERS To determine post-development Curve Numbers, new RCWD requirements are that the Hydrologic Soil Group (HSG) of areas within construction limits must be shifted down one classification for Curve Number 74 and half of one classification for Curve Number 49. This helps to account for grading impacts on soil structure. 4.2 N U RP STANDARDS The design storm for determining compliance with Nationwide Urban Runoff Program (NURP) standards for stormwater ponds shall be 2.5 inches. See Chapter 6 for additional details. 4.14 52 Stantec CITY OF CENTERVILLE -2018 LOCAL WATER PLAN WATER RESOURCE MANAGEMENT OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES 5.0 WATER RESOURCE MANAGEMENT OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES 5.1 BACKGROUND The City of Centerville has adopted several water resource management objectives, which provide a framework to guide development of policies and management programs. According to Minnesota Rules Chapter 8410, the development of objectives and policies must, at a minimum, address the following issues: Water Quantity, Water Quality, Recreation, Fish and Wildlife, Enhancement of Public Participation through Information and Education, Public Ditch Systems, Groundwater, Wetlands, and Erosion. The goals must be outlined in sufficient detail to provide direction regarding policy deliverables, provide direction to the organization's board, and be quantifiable so that success can be appropriately measured. The goals should recognize the relationship between water quality and land use. The mission statement of the RCWD is to "prevent flooding and enhance water quality in harmony with development for the common good." Thus, the RCWD and its board of managers established an operational framework to guide its management of cities, counties and townships located within the District. These are: • Demonstrate measurable success by solving problems and implementing solutions; • Explore a range of ideas and opportunities and projects to ensure healthy water resources for the Rice Creek Watershed; • Balance the complex inter-related dynamics of resource management; • Enlist the public and cities as partners in resource management; • Operate in a fiscally efficient manner based on providing "best value" and accountability; • Implement and construct innovative projects to solve problems and, • Make decisions in the best interest of the entire area comprising the Rice Creek Watershed. 5.2 OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES The City has adopted the following objectives and associated policies to be adopted as part of the LWP: 5.15 53 Stantec CITY OF CENTERVILLE -2018 LOCAL WATER PLAN WATER RESOURCE MANAGEMENT OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES Objective 1 Reduce to the greatest extent possible erosion and sediment deposition from new construction sites into natural water resources within the City. The City experienced significant development in the early to mid-2000s. While development has slowed considerably the past several years due to the economic downturn, it is likely to pick up again in the future. While it may not reach the level of the "boom years", development could continue in the City for several years into the future. To meet this objective, the City will implement a local program of erosion and sediment control that would be administered in addition to the RCWD permit and inspection program. The City realizes that RCWD efforts in this area are limited by manpower and budget constraints, and understands that erosion and sediment control can be better enforced at a more local level. The City understands its responsibilities as an MS4 city. However, there are likely places where the RCWD and the City could work together to eliminate redundancies. Centerville will work with the RCWD to do so. Related Policies (a) Continue enforcing the City code addressing erosion control for all new development occurring in the City (see appendix). Objective 2 Minimize potential damage from flooding of personal and public property. Flooding damages have long been a concern in the City due to the numerous wetland areas and the Clearwater Creek Ditch System. Moreover, flooding problems have resulted from the difficulty associated with maintaining proper drainage over the flat topography of the area. The City has been proactive in reducing flooding potential to residents. For example, in 1989, the City initiated the Floodplain Reduction Project along Clearwater Creek. This project involved the investment of significant resources to reduce flooding potential along Clearwater Creek. It was completed in 1994, with final approval from FEMA of the revised flood profile occurring in 1996. In 2015, the City worked with FEMA to updated the FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM). This map relies on updated LI DAR data to establish a more realistic and accurate floodplain. The FEMA FIRM map is attached (Figure 9). 5.16 54 Stantec CITY OF CENTERVILLE -2018 LOCAL WATER PLAN WATER RESOURCE MANAGEMENT OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES Related Policies (a) Continue enforcing the City code addressing floodplain management for all new development occurring in the City (see appendix). (b) Continue policy of reviewing new grading plans for potential flooding problems. (c) Implement the capital improvement projects described in Chapter 8. It is anticipated that these projects will help reduce flooding potential at several problem areas within the City. (d) Cooperate with the RCWD in administering infiltration standards. The City defers to the goals and policies of the RCWD regarding infiltration. New infiltration standards are further described in Chapter 6, Water Resource Management Plan. Objective 3 Protect and improve the water quality of the Clearwater Creek Ditch System, Peltier Lake, and Centerville Lake. All new developments within the City are now required to provide some type of pretreatment of stormwater such as ponding or infiltration basins. This policy has been in place since the mid- 1990s. Consequently, the City now maintains over 100 such features. Through recent street reconstruction projects, the City and county have addressed the few remaining areas where stormwater was discharged directly into Clearwater Creek with no treatment. These locations included two low points along Peltier Lake Drive, a low point on Brian Drive south of Main Street, and the low point at the Main Street culvert crossing. These locations now have some means of pretreatment. Direct discharge of stormwater to Centerville Lake is still present from the downtown area. However, the city has constructed the first phase of a stormwater reclamation project, aimed at eliminating this discharge as the downtown redevelops. This project was completed with cooperation from the RCWD. Related Policies (a) Work toward the implementation of policies, programs, and projects to achieve the requirements of the Peltier Lake and Centerville Lake TMDL Implementation Plan, when it is finalized and approved. (b) Support the RCWD Water Quality BMP Cost-Share Program. This is a dedicated cost- share grant program to assist property owners with the implementation of Best Management Practices (BMPs) aimed at improving the quality of surface waters within the watershed. 5.17 55 Stantec CITY OF CENTERVILLE -2018 LOCAL WATER PLAN WATER RESOURCE MANAGEMENT OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES (c) Initiate more frequent sweeping at direct discharge points along Peltier Lake Drive and Brian Drive, and coordinate with Anoka County for more frequent sweeping along Main Street. (d) Cooperate with the RCWD in administering infiltration standards. The City defers to the goals and policies of the RCWD regarding infiltration. (e) Identify retrofit opportunities in sub-watersheds where water quality treatment standards are not being met. Objective 4 Maintain the integrity of the stormwater collection system. Related Policies (a) Develop a systematic approach to maintenance of stormwater ponds and ditches. (b) Adjust the stormwater utility fee as appropriate to best utilize funds for the maintenance and capital improvements program. (c) Work with Minnesota Cities Stormwater Coalition to determine dredging costs, schedules, and disposal of sediment, especially contaminated sediment. Objective 5 Protect recreation, fish, and wildlife resources. The City is located in a very unique area surrounded by lakes, creeks, beaches, and parks. Realizing the value of these resources, the City desires to be a part of the preservation of these valuable resources. Related Policies (a) Continue enforcing the City code addressing shoreland activities (see appendix). (b) Support efforts of the MnDNR, the RCWD, and the Lake Homeowners Association in managing Centerville and Peltier Lakes. Objective 6 Increase public participation through information and education. The City currently distributes information to all residents through the City's website. This website provides an excellent forum for distributing information on water resource-related issues and 5.18 56 Stantec CITY OF CENTERVILLE -2018 LOCAL WATER PLAN WATER RESOURCE MANAGEMENT OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES developments to the public. Through this website, the City increases public awareness about water resource management through including regular features on its website. Additionally, the City's website provides links to information on websites of other agencies including the RCWD and BWSR. Related Policies (a) The City currently has signs at some of the entrances to public parks and well-travelled parkways. The City will continue to have signs at these entrances and will work to add signs to those parks that do not have signs, which highlight the importance of disposing of pet waste. will continue to have signs at the entrances to public parks and well-travelled walkways, highlighting the importance of disposing of pet waste. 5.19 57 Stantec CITY OF CENTERVILLE -2018 LOCAL WATER PLAN WATER RESOURCE MANAGEMENT PLAN 6.0 WATER RESOURCE MANAGEMENT PLAN This chapter of the plan provides specific information as to the proposed management framework and methods to meet the water resource management objectives and policies outlined in Chapter 5. The storm sewer and drainage basin map for the City is presented in Figure 8. 6.1 STORMWATER MANAGEMENT AND MAINTENANCE The City experienced significant development in the early to mid-2000s. While development has slowed considerably the past several years due to the economic downturn, it is likely to pick up again in the future. It is anticipated that development could continue in the City for a number of years into the future until near ultimate population and growth is achieved. Stormwater improvements are a requirement of City Code Chapter 157 for new developments. Most new storm sewer constructed in the City will be funded by developers, either directly or through a bonding and assessment process. In accordance with the RCWD Watershed Management Plan, and in an effort to protect downstream waters, the City requires that all new developments provide for treatment of stormwater discharge. If a project cumulatively creates or reconstructs 10,000 square feet or more of impervious surface, the developer must apply for a permit from the City and RCWD for the project. The current water quality treatment standard for all projects except public linear projects is determined as follows: Required Water Quality Treatment Volume (f t3) = Area of New or Reconstructed Impervious Surface (f tZ)x 1.1(in) in \ TP Removal Factor from Table 1 -- t/12 (f I Required Water Quality Treatment Volume (f t3) in = Area of New or Reconstructed Impervious Surface (f tZ)x 0.75(in) - 12(-) 6.20 58 ( Stantec CITY OFCENTERVILLE -2D1QLOCAL WATER PLAN WATER RESOURCE MANAGEMENT PLAN TABLE Q.1 -TPREMOVAL FACTORS FOR PROPERLY DESIGNED BK8Pe Infiltration Infiltration Feature 1.00 Water Reuse Irrigation 1.00 Biofiltration Underdrain 0.65 Filtration Sand or Rock Filter 0.50 Stormwater Wetlands Shallow Wetland 0.40 Pond/Wetland 0.55 Stormwater Ponds Wet Pond 0.50 rMultiple Ponds 0.60 Infiltration may be infeaoib|e, due to potential contamination /i.e. contaminated soils or potential otornnvvaterhotopoto\. physical limitations /i.e. low permeability soils, bedrock close tothe infiltration area, seasonal high water tables, or karst areas), or land use limitations /i.e. nearby vve||o orutility |ooadono\. |nthese cases, alternative BMPoare required, as listed inTable 0.1 These BMPo are stated in order of RCVVD'o preferenoe, due toTP removal efficiencies. The RCWD requires protective easements for all stormwater detention facilities and conveyance structures. These easements are intended to protect floodplain and otormvvater storage areas from alterations that may interfere with storage and/or flow of surface vvater, particularly during flood conditions. They also serve as formal notice to the property owners and future property owners that the land within the easements may beinundated atany future date. Maintenance ofotormvvaterfacilities will be coordinated with the RCVVD. CurrenUy, inspections are performed inthe spring and fall, with maintenance done ao needed. Maintenance ofthe current system will continue to be a priority for the City. As new development 000uro, developers will "turn over" these new otornnvvaterfaoi|ideo to the City Public Works Departnnent, including trunk and lateral storm oevvene, catch basins, otormvvater BMPo, and ponds and outlet structures. With such a relatively new storm sewer system, there are currently few maintenance tasks other than street sweeping, which is done a minimum of twice per year. However, the City plans to formulate a Maintenance Plan Budget within five years. City staff will inspect ponds in accordance with the requirements of the NPIDES MS4 Permit. The City not only will inopeot, but also will dredge public pondo, which is defined as any pond that takes drainage from the City's storm sewer Potential capital improvement projects are described in Chapter 8, Capital Improvements Plan. These projects ohou|daidinaddreooingmaintenanoeoonoernovvithintheirreopeotiveareao. 0.21 Stantec CITY OF CENTERVILLE -2018 LOCAL WATER PLAN WATER RESOURCE MANAGEMENT PLAN As described in Section 3.8, Utility Systems, eleven residences and two commercial/industrial sites remain on Individual Sewage Treatment Systems (ISTS). The City will work closely with the County to inspect these systems and assure that they are operated properly. 6.2 SUPPORT OF RCWD PROGRAMS AND EXISTING AGREEMENTS The City recognizes the benefit of a governmental entity such as the RCWD for purposes of water resource management. An agency such as the RCWD can best handle sensitive intercommunity issues such as water and drainage rights and management. As a result, the City will continue to support and coordinate with the RCWD on all water resource management issues, and it recognizes the role of the RCWD to continue to administer all water resource permitting and regulation responsibilities within the City. The City presently has existing agreements with the City of Lino Lakes and the RCWD. The RCWD is responsible for maintenance of the Clearwater Creek Ditch System within the City. The City also cooperates with the City of Lino Lakes under a Joint Powers Agreement with street sweeping and rock hauling efforts. There are no other known existing agreements with the City of Lino Lakes, RCWD, or private parties. 6.3 PHASE II NPDES MS4 PERMIT AND SWPPP The MPCA is the permitting authority in Minnesota for the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES). Under this system, the City is considered a municipal separate storm sewer system (MS4) community and must obtain a Phase II NPDES MS4 Permit. Under the provisions of its MS4 Permit, the City has developed and implemented a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Program (SWPPP). The SWPPP addresses six minimum control measures: 1. Public education 2. Public involvement 3. Illicit discharge detection and elimination 4. Construction site runoff control 5. Post-construction runoff control 6. Pollution prevention in municipal operations The City has identified best management practices (BMPs) and measurable goals associated with each minimum control measure. An annual report on the implementation of the SWPPP is prepared and submitted to the MPCA each year. Details of the City's SWPPP are available on its website. 6.22 60 Stantec CITY OF CENTERVILLE -2018 LOCAL WATER PLAN WATER RESOURCE MANAGEMENT PLAN 6.4 TOTAL MAXIMUM DAILY LOAD (TMDL) STUDIES TMDL studies have been completed and approved by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA) for both Peltier and Centerville Lakes, and for the Lino Lakes Chain of Lakes. The Lino Lakes Chain of Lakes TMDL Report was approved on November 25, 2013, and the Lino Lakes Chain of Lakes TMDL Report was approved on September 27, 2013. Peltier Lake and Centerville Lake have been listed by the MPCA as impaired for nutrients, with phosphorus identified as the main pollutant causing the impairment. The TMDL report calls for a 46% reduction in total phosphorus loading for Peltier Lake and a zero percent reduction for Centerville. The assumption is that phosphorus reductions to Peltier Lake will benefit Centerville Lake as well. There is no specific reduction identified for the City; instead, the TMDL report calls for a "categorical reduction" of 46% that would need to be met by the contributing watershed. Specific implementation strategies affecting Centerville include implementing RCWD rules and meeting the requirements of the 2007 Environmental Assessment Worksheet prepared for the City's Downtown Development. The Lino Lakes Chain of Lakes are impaired for nutrients, again with phosphorus identified as the main pollutant. The TMDL report calls for no load reduction from MS4 communities within the watershed. Instead, internal loading and outflow from Peltier Lake are identified as the primary phosphorus sources. Meeting the load reduction requirement in the Peltier Lake TMDL is considered essential to meeting the Lino Lakes Chain of Lakes water quality goals. 6.5 STORMWATER RUNOFF RATE CONTROL To prevent flooding associated with increased runoff rates from new developments, rate control must be provided within each development that maintains existing runoff conditions (or less) for the 2-year, 10-year, and 100-year storm events. Rates must be determined using Atlas-14 precipitation frequency estimates. 6.6 MANAGEMENT OF CLEARWATER CREEK DITCH SYSTEM Most runoff in the City of Centerville is routed either directly or indirectly to Clearwater Creek. Clearwater Creek is a natural waterway connected to the Anoka-Washington Judicial Ditch 3 (AWJD 3) system. The Clearwater Creek Ditch System can be considered a "trunk storm sewer" for the entire City. RCWD, as the public drainage authority, is responsible for maintenance of the AWJD 3 system. The system will be managed in accordance with the rate control and water quality policies outlined in Sections 6.1 and 6.5. 6.7 INTERCOMMUNITY FLOWS The City is bounded on all sides by the City of Lino Lakes. Any flows leaving Centerville therefore enter Lino Lakes. Most the City drains to Peltier Lake, either directly or via Clearwater Creek. A portion of the City drains to Centerville Lake, which then drains to Peltier Lake. A 6.23 61 Stantec CITY OF CENTERVILLE -2018 LOCAL WATER PLAN WATER RESOURCE MANAGEMENT PLAN small area in the northwestern portion of the City drains directly to Lino Lakes. The Rice Creek Watershed District identifies the intercommunity flows from Centerville to Lino Lakes, via Clearwater Creek (Anoka-Washington Judicial Ditch 3) as: • 2-year, 24-hour rainfall peak flow: 196 cfs • 10-year, 24-hour rainfall peak flow: 339 cfs • 100-year, 24-hour rainfall peak flow: 573 cfs • 100-year, 10-day snowmelt peak flow: 433 cfs Because of the large storage volume available in the two lakes, peak flows entering from the City will be greatly attenuated prior to discharge from Peltier Lake. As stated earlier in this chapter, the City requires that peak flow rates from the 2-, 10-, and 100-year storm events be maintained at or below existing conditions. The RCWD rules require the infiltration and/or retention of the runoff volume as described in Section 6.1. The combination of these factors leads to a net reduction below existing conditions for discharge leaving the City and entering Lino Lakes. 6.8 EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL Recognizing that erosion and sediment control can best be administered on a local level, the Centerville City Council discussed methods and policies that can be implemented to control erosion from new construction sites. In the past, this responsibility was delegated almost fully to the Rice Creek Watershed District. However, due to the number of construction projects the RCWD administers during a given construction season, it is difficult for the watershed district to inspect these projects. The erosion and sediment control criteria for new developments that resulted from these discussions with the City have been consolidated into an Erosion and Sediment Control Policy for New Developments. The policy adopts the procedures and recommendations of the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency's Protecting Water Quality in Urban Areas: Best Management Practices for Minnesota. City Code Chapter 157 addressing Erosion Control is provided in the appendix. To prevent soil erosion into surface water systems, RCWD requires a District permit where soil disturbance or removal of vegetative cover affects one acre or more of land, or where soil disturbance/removal exceeds 10,000 square feet or more of land if the disturbed area is greater than 300 feet or more. Erosion and sediment control plans must: 1) address erosion and sediment issues during and after project completion, 2) be consistent with the MPCA's document"Protecting Water Quality in Urban Areas," 3) minimize the removal of vegetation, and 4) must protect facilities used for post-construction stormwater infiltration. The RCWD has encouraged the City to participate in the District's Water Quality BMP Cost-Share Program. This is a dedicated cost-share grant program to assist property owners with the implementation of Best Management Practices (BMPs) aimed at improving the quality of surface waters within the 6.24 62 Stantec CITY OF CENTERVILLE -2018 LOCAL WATER PLAN WATER RESOURCE MANAGEMENT PLAN District. Installing a rain garden, stabilizing erosion problems along shorelines, restoring degraded wetlands, installation of agricultural BMPs, and installing pervious pavers are some of the practices that may be eligible for this program. For selected projects, the RCWD may provide funding up to 50% of total project costs up to a maximum of$5,000. If a project is deemed to be highly beneficial to local water resources, then the RCWD can fund up to 75% of eligible materials and contracted labor up to $7,500. It is important to note that this policy is not intended to eliminate or reduce RCWD inspection efforts within the City. Rather, this policy would be a local means of enforcing erosion control issues with the same primary goals as the RCWD — protection of natural water resource systems. 6.9 WETLAND MANAGEMENT In accordance with the Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act (WCA), the RCWD currently serves as the Local Government Unit (LGU) for WCA administration within the City. The City anticipates that the RCWD will continue in this role in the future. Chapter 5 of the RCWD 2010 Watershed Management Plan delineates the details of the watershed district's wetland policies. These policies govern all wetland management issues within the City. As with floodplains and stormwater facilities, all wetlands within the property limits of new developments must be covered by protective easements. Any construction activity that may impact wetlands may require permits from the RCWD, the US Army Corps of Engineers, and/or MnDNR. Correspondence regarding any wetland impacts should be directed to the following: MN Dept. of Natural Resources US Army Corps of Engineers Jason Speigel, Area Hydrologist Andy Beaudet, Anoka County Point of Contact 1200 Warner Road St. Paul District, 180 5th Street E., Suite 700 St. Paul, MN 55106 St. Paul, MN 55101-1678 (651) 259-5822 (651) 290-5642 Rice Creek Watershed District Nick Tomczik, Permit Coordinator/Wetland Specialist 4325 Pheasant Ridge Drive NE, Suite 611 Blaine, MN 55449 (763) 398-3079 6.10 FLOODPLAIN ADMINISTRATION Flood damage prevention requirements are contained in City Code Chapter 155 (see appendix). The goal of the requirements is to promote the public health, safety, and general welfare and to minimize the potential impacts of flooding such as loss of life, loss of property, disruption of commerce and governmental services, and extraordinary public expenditures for flood protection and relief. Figure 7 illustrates the approximate floodplain boundaries within the City. 6.25 63 Stantec CITY OF CENTERVILLE -2018 LOCAL WATER PLAN WATER RESOURCE MANAGEMENT PLAN 6.11 SHORELAND REGULATION Shoreland regulation is discussed in Section 3.11 (Shoreland and Buffer Zones). 6.12 PUBLIC PARTICIPATION The City implements a public information and education program through the City website. Future website pages will contain information about different topics concerning water resources within the City, as well as summaries of continuing water resource management programs. Some possible future topics for the website are listed below: • Educational articles on stormwater management treatment. • Educational articles on environmental policies. • Storm sewer maintenance schedules. • RCWD policy changes. • City policy changes. • Household impacts on water quality. 6.26 64 Stantec CITY OF CENTERVILLE -2018 LOCAL WATER PLAN IMPLEMENTATION PROGRAM 7.0 IMPLEMENTATION PROGRAM This chapter of the LWP provides information as to the practical method for implementing the programs discussed in Chapter 6. Implementation and management of programs require both personnel and financial resources. This chapter provides information about which entities will be responsible for which programs as well as a method for raising funds to implement programs. 7.1 ADMINISTRATION RESPONSIBILITY AND IMPROVEMENT PLAN As stated in Section 6.2, the RCWD will continue to require permits for construction projects and all water resource management issues within the City of Centerville. The City's programs and policies will be administered in conjunction with RCWD programs; none of the programs and policies proposed in this LWP are meant to conflict with any of the RCWD programs or policies. Furthermore, Centerville endeavors to reduce redundancies with inspection, enforcement, and regulation. 7.2 FINANCING OF MANAGEMENT PROGRAMS The funding for implementation of several of the proposed programs and projects identified in the LWP could come from several sources. Possible sources of revenue include: Stormwater Utility Fee: Stormwater Utility fees are levied on all property in the City. The fee is collected each quarter with the sanitary sewer bill. The City's current fees are presented in Chapter 9. Building Permits: A cash dedication to the Stormwater Utility Fund is part of the building permit requirement. Stormwater Area Charge: New developments occurring in Centerville are charged a fee based on the total platted area. All revenue generated from this program is deposited into the Stormwater Utility Fund. The City's current fees are presented in Chapter 9. Special Assessments: The City may assess for improvement projects based on the benefit provided to the affected properties. The assessment may not be greater than the benefit provided to the property. Grants: Grant programs exist for water management projects and will be explored as possible funding sources. 7.27 65 Stantec CITY OF CENTERVILLE -2018 LOCAL WATER PLAN IMPLEMENTATION PROGRAM 7.3 PUBLIC PARTICIPATION THROUGH INFORMATION AND EDUCATION The City staff prepares a City website (http://www.centervillemn.com). This website is used as a forum for providing information and education to the residents of Centerville. Information for the website is obtained from lake association groups, various governmental agencies, and the City Engineer. 7.4 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN SUMMARY Projects are identified and described in Chapter 8 as potential capital improvement projects. 7.28 66 Stantec CITY OF CENTERVILLE -2018 LOCAL WATER PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN 8.0 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN 8.1 INTRODUCTION As defined in the Centerville Capital Improvements Plan, capital improvements are those projects having a life expectancy that exceeds the financing period of the item or having a total purchase price equal to or greater than $5,000. Included in the total capital improvement cost are engineering, construction, land acquisition, administration, and legal and bonding fees. 8.2 COMPLETED CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS In the last update of the City's LWP, released in September 2012, the City has performed capital improvement plans identified in that plan. The location of these projects is shown in Figure 11, and they are described below. 1. Downtown Stormwater Reclamation Project: A 42" trunk line sewer from the downtown area to the stormwater reclamation system was constructed. This project was completed prior to eventual redevelopment of the downtown area, which eliminates the direct discharges which exist from the downtown. The pipe is oversized for current flows. The total cost of this project was $450,000. 2. Center Oaks 2 and Royal Meadows Infiltration Features: Streets were reconstructed in two neighborhoods with the installation of water mains. Infiltration features were included. The total cost of this project was $200,000. 3. Back Yard Drainage Improvements: Improvements to backyard drainage throughout the City were made. Prior to 2012, there were capital improvement projects that were completed between 2004 (when the previous local water plan was published) and 2012 (when the most recent update was made). Improvements that were made in Centerville include: 1. Center Oaks Drainage Improvements: Stormwater diverted to alleviate cul-de-sac flooding. 2. Shad Avenue Drainage Improvements: Back yard drain tile installed, ditches regraded. 3. Peltier Lake Drive Water Quality Improvements: Direct flows into Clearwater Creek were intercepted in rain gardens. 8.29 67 Stantec CITY OF CENTERVILLE -2018 LOCAL WATER PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN 4. Heritage Street Water Quality Improvements: Infiltration trench was constructed to treat stormwater heading directly to Centerville Lake. 5. Rain Gardens on Peltier Lake Drive: Rain gardens were installed along Peltier Lake Drive as part of a street reconstruction project. 6. Rain Gardens on 73rd Street: Rain gardens were installed along 73,d Street as part of a street reconstruction project. 7. Rain Garden in Hidden Spring Park: Rain garden was installed as part of an agreement to treat stormwater from a 2004 Street Reconstruction Project. 8. Quebec Area Drainage Improvements: Backyard drain tile was installed in the Quebec Area of the City. 9. Pheasant Marsh Drainage Improvements: Ditch grading along the west side of Pheasant Marsh 2nd Addition. Improvements were made to improve drainage from catch basins on Mallard Way. 10. Phase I — Downtown Stormwater Reclamation Project: A constructed stormwater-fed irrigation system was constructed in LaMotte Park. This system is designed to take flows from the future downtown redevelopment project. 8.3 FUTURE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS 1. Back Yard Drainage Improvements: Improvements to backyard drainage throughout the City will need to continue to be made. The following list includes areas within Centerville that have experienced drainage issues due to long, flat yards. These yards are listed by the highest priority yards, and the amount of drain tile needed to improve drainage: A. Center Street north lot lines, east of Ivy Court (460 ft) B. Brian Drive/Way (550 ft) C. Meadow Court/Lane (380 ft) D. Center Street south lot lines, east of Tourville Circle (500 ft) E. Brian Drive/Cottonwood Court (570 ft) F. Eagle Trail/Brian Drive, north of trail (240 ft) G. North of Unity Avenue cul-de-sac (200 ft) H. Revoir Street, north property line (500 ft) I. McBride Park NE corner (170 ft) J. Mound Trail ditch 1200/1300 area (275 ft) K. North Center Street property line, west of Dupre Road (350 ft) 8.30 68 Stantec CITY OF CENTERVILLE -2018 LOCAL WATER PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN The total footage of drain tile that would have to be added to complete the improvements listed above is 4200 ft. The City has completed previous drain tile projects consisting of trenching an 18" wide and 18" deep trough by installing river rock with tile surrounded by fabric and covered with 4" thick of pea rock on top. In 2009, this cost $50/ft. Costs to complete these improvements today would depend upon the location, length of run, elevation, and tree roots/other obstacles. Accounting for inflation and assuming a cost of$50/ft would mean these improvements would cost the City roughly $230,000. 2. Stormwater Pond Dredging: Like other cities in the Twin Cities Metropolitan area, the City of Centerville has many public stormwater ponds, which may need to be dredged. Dredging will likely be the most financially cumbersome capital improvement for the City, and prudent financial planning to accommodate this need is important. There is some guidance provided by Don Berger, of the MPCA Municipal Division, entitled Cost Estimates for Minnesota Stormwater Collection Systems. Stormwater ponds need to be dredged frequently to maintain their efficiency. Dredging will get rid of solid and semisolid wastes, including soil loss from open areas, litter, sand, leaf litter, construction sediments, and asphalt grit. Costs and dredging estimates are based on 2010 data, to manage Level 3 contaminated stormwater sediment (the most contaminated sediment) for disposal. Sediment would be disposed of at municipal solid waste landfills (MSW) facilities. Costs of dredging will vary, but several cities have sought to estimate their costs. The City of Minnetonka worked with Barr Engineering to develop a dredging cost equation. The equation does not include landfill disposal costs: Dredge Cost [2009 Dollars] = 78,515 x Volume 0.6727[AF] The above estimate uses 2009 dollars, so will need to be converted to present day dollars to account for inflation. The estimate of cost for dredging is roughly $50/cubic yard. Even though this estimation provides a framework to understanding potential costs associated with dredging, exact costs are extremely difficult to predict. Costs will vary on aspects such as the amount of sediment that is classified as Level 3 (most contaminated), and the expense of treating at a MSW facility. Thus, it is difficult to predict how much dredging will cost. As a current member of the Minnesota Cities Stormwater Coalition (MCSC), the City will work closely with MCSC to determine appropriate measures for addressing stormwater pond dredging, and to develop a plan moving forward. 8.31 69 Stantec CITY OF CENTERVILLE -2018 LOCAL WATER PLAN STORMWATER CHARGES 9.0 STORMWATER CHARGES The City of Centerville is currently implementing the following stormwater fees: Quarterly Stormwater Management Fee (Developed Property) Residential $9.30 per residential unit Commercial/Industrial $0.00267 per square foot of impervious, minimum $9.30 per unit Stormwater Area Charge (With Developer's Agreement) New Development $0.05739 per square foot of platted area Stormwater Area Charge (With Building Permit) Residential $350.00 per residential unit Commercial/Industrial $0.07 per square foot of building, parking, and other impervious surfaces State statutes require that the funds collected through the stormwater area charge program be used for specific, limited uses. Likewise, fees collected citywide through the quarterly stormwater utility charge are also designated for specific uses. Below is a summary of how these charges are to be designated. Quarterly Stormwater Management Fee • Regular maintenance of City storm sewer system. • Regular sediment removal from stormwater ponds. • Public Works equipment and expenses associated with the regular stormwater system maintenance program. • Funding of the Public Information and Education Program. 9.32 70 Stantec CITY OF CENTERVILLE -2018 LOCAL WATER PLAN STORMWATER CHARGES Stormwater Area Charge • Improvements to existing systems due to increased load on the system from new development. • Construction and maintenance of trunk storm sewer to serve future developments. • Construction and maintenance of increased ponding capacity to serve future developments. As shown above, the City proposes to structure the fees in such a way as to fund ongoing and long-term maintenance programs out of the quarterly fee levied to individual property owners. Capital costs and improvements necessary from the increased load on the stormwater system from new developments will be funded from new development stormwater area charges. 9.33 71 Stantec CITY OF CENTERVILLE -2018 LOCAL WATER PLAN AMENDMENT PROCESS 10.0 AMENDMENT PROCESS 10.1 REVIEW AND ADOPTION PROCESS Review and adoption of this Local Water Plan will follow the procedure outlined in Minnesota Statutes 10313.235: `After consideration but before adoption by the governing body, each local unit shall submit its water management plan to the watershed management organization for review for consistency with the watershed plan adopted pursuant to section 10313.231...The organization shall approve or disapprove the local plan or parts of the plan. The organization shall have 60 days to complete its review; provided, however, that the watershed management organization shall, as part of its review, take into account the comments submitted to it by the Metropolitan Council pursuant to subdivision 3a. If the organization fails to complete its review within the prescribed period, the local plan shall be deemed approved unless an extension is agreed to by the local unit.' `Concurrently with its submission of its local water management plan to the watershed management organization as provided in subdivision 3, each local unit of government shall submit its water management plan to the Metropolitan Council for review and comment by the council. The council shall have 45 days to review and comment upon the local plan or parts of the plan with respect to consistency with the council's comprehensive development guide for the metropolitan area. The council's 45-day review period shall run concurrently with the 60-day review period by the watershed management organization and shall send a copy of its comments to the local government unit. If the Metropolitan Council fails to complete its review and make comments to the watershed management organization within the 45-day period, the watershed management organization shall complete its review as provided in subdivision 3.' `After approval of the local plan by the organization, the local government unit shall adopt and implement its plan within 120 days and shall amend its official controls accordingly within 180 days.' 10.2 AMENDMENTS TO PLAN AND FUTURE UPDATES The City of Centerville Local Water Plan will require periodic amendments to address changes and to remain current with both watershed district and state requirements. Minnesota state statute requires municipalities to update local water plans within two years following a watershed district plan update. The Rice Creek Watershed District amended its 2010 RCWD Water Management Plan in 2016. The City has updated its local LWP for conformance with the RCWD plan. 10.34 72 Stantec CITY OF CENTERVILLE -2018 LOCAL WATER PLAN AMENDMENT PROCESS Updates of the Capital Improvement Plan and the Comprehensive Plan may also require an update of the LWP. Residents or businesses within the City can also petition amendments to the LWP at any time. The City will conduct a public hearing on all proposed LWP amendments. Notice of the public hearing and a description of the proposed amendments shall be published in the local newspaper at least ten days prior to the date of the hearing. At the hearing, the City will hear all comments on the proposed LWP amendments. 10.35 73 Stantec CITY OF CENTERVILLE -2018 LOCAL WATER PLAN APPENDIX Appendix 74 ST. FRANCISVOAK BETHE WYOMING EAST BETHEL CHISAGO CITY LINWOOD 8 BURNSROVE TWP ,ffi 1 69 CITY LOCATION COLUMBUS a� FOREST LAKE SCAND RAMSEY 47 ANDOVER HAM LAKE 97 FOREST LAKE TWP 101 S AN KA S i S .RS DAYTON S COON RAPIDS BLAINE 61 CHAMPLIN 35W ILL MAY CENTE HUGO TWP � 65 L 107 LINO LAKES F CIRC E 35E 94 OSSEO PINE M UNDSVI W WHITE SP INC SHOREVIEW BEAR aN BROOKLYN PARK LL DELL OOD MAPL ROVE PARK ARDENTWP HILLS NORTH OAKS HILLS BROOKLYN FRIDL Y NEW WHITE GRANT CENTER VADNAIS BEAR MAHTOM DI TWP RIGHTO CRYST L ftft694 HEIGHTS LAKE NEW 6 LITTLE 55 PLYM UTH HOPE_7 BINSD L CANAD NORTH 36 ROSEVILLE ST. 494 GOLDEN FALCON MAPLEWOODLAKE ELMO VALLEY 0 12 ST. LOUIS PARK MIN POLIS / ST. PAUL 94 HOPKINS MINNETONKA 7 169Z IM EN D TA 494 WOODBURY HEIG S EDINA S UTH 62 MPLS./ST.PAUL 101 S .PAUL RICHFIELD INT.—AIRPORT NEWPORT SUNFISH ,NHASSEN 5 LAKE � 56 � 'n tn ST.PAUL EDEN PRAIRIE LI)- PARK � 35W o� 55 /212 EAGAN BLOOMINGTON INVER GROVE 35E HEIGHTS 101 13 LOCATION MAP CITY OF CENTERVILLE FIGURE: 1 LOCAL WATER PLAN u 2335HIghway36w St.Paul,MN 55113 DATE: 1 1/22/2017 75 PROJ. NO.: 193803961 -.sla't".'om 0 n �n ....... 1 z ` a is paw I i a �• TL AEOIa m •��.. i 1� � '� a '•� . _l \ pada • I [ 0-61 •O�� y.Y �/� 1 ,Cq` 2{ hP,■fJ� _ /\ter C`, ' ❑� r,,,,.L�/' 1-0 YSI QY • � � _ N •f/J•�l■ Q ■O� . •'�f • O'f�yy L�','tl l V `+ j ........ o �... � Ll t \ R , 1p U i I I 4 fC I . � N LL N Q CL CL �S ---------- ' �, H LL Z 10 \ Y B N � p O V 01N Lp r ;3 —1 I L—LN aAV 410E tS'Pa 00 z, a 0 Pa uelie U 3 � 3 a= Pa aidn(] Pa IIIN U) 'pa ssaJ50Jd> ;. 4E P8'00 PaapiAJayUaC) Pa U04410E) A� N .......:.. .............. .... Y �a )7' J N V A Y �lz T / J 1r,� N Y M U m G° 4-J / ' LL N CL R + •ti��o V = � � N t' / \ .......:. .......: ............ �... N �� _ N i� LL Z cv 0 0 �+ O Y � J U L \ /jU � O N � O O O 0 // � 3SE-I ij . 3SE I 4 8 ..................... L_11-U lz M.o ............. .... ........:. ........... t .. ......... ..................................�... .. ......... .......... ......... ..... ._._._. f ` — V E \\\ Q 4-1 W 4.d LL J � z V LL �(— O O = o fn o c a ti Z cn o o a-i + o z Z w o 35£I ......... .........: AOL N any gjoZ t79Pad ....... ' � V O 'Pa UePe NEW MPT -o Pa aidnCl M1 Pa IVIN c 5 Pa sseJ BOJd c m 2'Pa 00 Pa alll/ua}uaG 'Pa UOMOD r OJ 4 a € r fi J : N } V o E d L 4 E hA 1 G°` LL N (6 Q a a 0 L a ; v � _ v m o w a - �� /Vl w > cu................9 v m wf J v o n `v J o 0 o 0 o 0 o o o o o fn > '— o 0 a o 0 o 0 0 o 0 J o00 00 LL U U J o 0 Y U Jz L : CJ O : 3 N O O N _ t ---------- ---- �S£ ------ -- — IV --------------- I I i TEL, I 4 4 4 I 3 I II I I I I I I I I I I i R I j i I i E IIII E 00 I I i i t i t i i g I i I _ I i 1i i `r� _-- 00 i — ---- ........ ......:: �....: .. ...L..... ......... m � F j Y ttjjj � (6 J ID N LL J Zt 2! 1 a� Q Uia^ N E ti" .. 0 d LL E o a u 3 (14 D m c m o a umi a ------ • U Q w U K U a 0 }� N LL 0 O W O y� O U O Y L U 0 `o 0 c� I \ I i --- I .. HEI I --a { J 3 I L_f 3 I LI ......... ......... _j- - - IT - I I 3 3 } F- ull 00 fT N I ID t � J � N � "` ..� C) .O 7 a c LL N o 6 O � o J w N V c-, v m � a 0 W N m o U c x U U a U rc rc O .. ... LCL O LL (1) CD o_ E N O U v o Y t 4-- p n J l O CO o z N o � U o � � o 0 CO x ------- -------------- IF l a �S£I - _ - -- ---- --------------- I I I .............. .... ......... ...... ......... ......... ......... ........ I ......... ........ ._ i ......... .. I I M! _ I I I I I I S I 3 _ E I�f I � i II ILa UG 3 I ,; I 00 TTJjJTF -- -- �i l ......... .. ,r r D Y 1j� �" N co u 7 U L E m ^ ^LL LL N Z� W � Z / C W , � w °' aL z� O Z Z }�� � _ •� U aLL � Q w � LLw x �� � N w r a N Q ... V... W LL W LL LL W W U Q W N 0 LL U' U' X X rC = m 0 i O � 3rcw = ww0� Za o U Uorcrcrcrcrc � � m . a o C,O z 0 c� �f ___ - -- �i ....... ...... .�... ........ ..... ..... ..... : ..:.. i aEl-------------- --�� — ----- .......................................... .............................................................. 3 ........... ....................... ......... �77 4 _ m 3 _ E3 m C7 00 '`^. s .. �l i .....!........`.`.: ....... .:.:.: ......... ......... — — ......... .......... ......... J 7 O N U Q +1 fJ z LL N o � J o c c 0 0 V 0 0 LL L LL ws 0 C) C) Q 0 0 0 m o o Lo ......, ......... LL i � o 00 Y � V O J L U O m O D � fJ -N V I I I I ser v� o "o I- 0 a= 1— 0— 10 1— o LL W aam o° yj Lu cf) MUMH o z I I I W A A I I i (3 U k I 1 10000- a® w A A A A CO _j _ Q zz om� owz v a 0 z o z zQ <w w Yrs mwK �� o z xa....... o tom - Q d, oN N <h9 LL�o w # ® g z sarv� — lo �a al z k. lo -F e v 's 'i fid € . � is §"- 2 I r a' • ' a mm A 5� a . © ®r oz ,, wz v � w a x s . �5• — l<lo LO 00 077 uz El o� z z w J > J Q CL z > LL w w � O � o— to -.1 O t— Q O U O --1 CITY OF CENTERVILLE REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION entervi(Ce E77 Agenda Item# Department: Requested Council Meeting Date: Administration January 24, 2018 TITLE OF ISSUE: City Facebook Page BACKGROUND AND SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION: One of the City's Focus Goals for 2017 was to increase our social media presence. We have been increasing our activity on Twitter and would now like to initiate a city Facebook page. Two main issues surround this endeavor: content control and records retention. Attached, you will find a sample social media policy from the League of MN Cities (LMC)which addresses the issue of content control. The LMC guidance on records retention says: "Much of what is posted likely does not need to be kept unless it serves as the official record of government action." We do not anticipate using social media as the sole source of any official government action. That being said, our policy will outline a regular schedule of information download, for record retention. COST AND SOURCE(S) OF FUNDING: No direct cost. Staff time expectations should be discussed. REQUESTED COUNCIL ACTION: Motion to adopt Social Media Policy and authorize creation of a city Facebook page. For Clerk's Use: SUPPORTED DOCUMENTS ATTACHED Motion By: Resolution Ordinance Contract Minutes Plan Map Second By: Vote Record: A e Nay King Other(specify) POl1Cy Love Paar Koski Montain Administration Department Use: Refer to: Consent Tabled Until: Regular Other: 86 City of Centerville, Minnesota Social Media Policy Purpose The City of Centerville views the role of social media in government as a medium to communicate and deliver messages directly to citizens. The city endeavors to have information which is distributed via social networking to be accurate, consistent, and timely and meet the information needs of the City's customers. This policy seeks to ensure proper use of the City of Centerville's social media sites by its representatives. The City of Centerville wishes to establish a positive and informative social media presence. City representatives have the responsibility to use the City's social media resources in an efficient, effective, ethical and lawful manner pursuant to all existing City and departmental policies. This policy also provides guidelines and standards for city representatives regarding the use of social media for communication with residents, colleagues and all other followers. Policy The City of Centerville will determine, at its discretion, how its web-based social media resources will be designed, implemented and managed as part of its overall communication and information sharing strategy. City social media sites may be modified or removed by the City at any time and without notice. City of Centerville social media accounts are considered a City asset and administrator access to these accounts must be securely administered in accordance with the City's Computer Use policy. All social media web sites created and utilized during the course and scope of an employee's performance of his/her job duties will be identified as belonging to the City of Centerville, including a link to the City's official web site. Scope This policy applies to any existing or proposed social media accounts sponsored, established, registered or authorized by the City of Centerville. This policy also covers the private use of the City's social media accounts by all City representatives, including its employees and agents, Council members, appointed board or commission members and all public safety volunteers to the extent it affects the City. Questions regarding the scope of this policy should be directed to the City Administrator or other designee. Definition Social media are internet and mobile-based applications, websites and functions, other than email, for sharing and discussing information, where users can post photos, video, comments and links to other information to create content on any imaginable topic. This may be referred to as "user-generated content" or"consumer-generated media." 87 Social media includes, but is not limited to: • Social networking sites such as Facebook, LinkedIn, Twitter, and mobile apps • Blogs • Social news sites such as Reddit and Buzzfeed • Video and photo sharing sites such as YouTube, Instagram, SnapChat, and Flickr • Wikis, or shared encyclopedias such as Wikipedia • An ever emerging list of new web-based platforms generally regarded as social media or having many of the same functions as those listed above As used in this policy, "employees and agents" means all City representatives, including its employees and other agents of the city, such as independent contractors, commission/committee members or Council members. Rules of Use City employees and agents with administrator access are responsible for managing social media content. Facilities or departments wishing to have a new social media presence must initially submit a request to the City Administrator or designee in order to ensure social media accounts are kept to a sustainable number and policies are followed. All approved sites will be clearly marked as the City of Centerville site and will be linked with the official City website (www. centervillemn.com). No one may establish social media accounts or websites on behalf of the City unless authorized in accordance with this policy Administration of all social media accounts must comply with applicable laws, regulations, and policies as well as proper business etiquette. City social media accounts accessed and utilized during the course and scope of an employee's performance of his/her job duties may not be used for private or personal purposes or for the purpose of expressing private or personal views on personal, political or policy issues or to express personal views or concerns pertaining to City employment relations matters. Social media may not be used by the City or any City employee or agent to disclose private or confidential information. Social media should not be used to disclose sensitive information; if there is any question as to whether information is private, confidential or sensitive, contact the City Administrator or other designee. When using social media, as a representative of the City, employees and agents will act in a professional manner. Be aware that content will not only reflect on the writer but also on the city of Centerville as a whole, including elected officials and other city employees and agents. Make sure information is accurate and free of grammatical errors. Examples include but are not limited to: • Adhere to all City personnel and Computer Use policies • Use only appropriate language • Not providing private or confidential information, including names, or using such material as part of any content added to a site. • Not negatively commenting on community partners or their services, or using such material as part of any content added to a site. 88 • Not providing information related to pending decisions that would compromise negotiations. • Be aware that all content added to a site is subject to open records/right to know laws and discovery in legal cases. • Always keep in mind the appropriateness of content. • Comply with any existing code of ethical behavior established by the City. Where keeping public comments off of the publically viewed site or feed is an available option, comments from the public will not be shown. The City wishes to debate issues of policy and governance in a traditional, face-to-face forum at its open meetings. Where comments or replies can only be moderated, City of Centerville staff with administrative rights will not edit any posted comments. However, comments posted by members of the public will be removed if they are abusive, obscene, defamatory, in violation of the copyright, trademark right or other intellectual property right of any third party, or otherwise inappropriate or incorrect. The following are examples of content that may be removed by City staff before or shortly after being published: • Potentially libelous comments • Obscene or racist comments • Personal attacks, insults, or threatening language • Plagiarized material • Private, personal information published without consent • Comments totally unrelated to the topic of the forum • Commercial promotions or spam • Hyperlinks to material that is not directly related to the discussion Personal Social Media Use The City of Centerville respects employees and agents' rights to post and maintain personal websites, blogs and social media pages and to use and enjoy social media on their own personal devices during non-work hours. The City requires employees and agents to act in a prudent manner with regard to website and internet postings that reference the City of Centerville, its personnel, its operation or its property. Employees and agents and others affiliated with the City may not use a city brand, logo or other city identifiers on their personal sites, nor post information that purports to be the position of the City without prior authorization. City employees and agents are discouraged from identifying themselves as city employees when responding to or commenting on blogs with personal opinions or views. If an employee chooses to identify him or herself as a City of Centerville employee, and posts a statement on a matter related to City business, a disclaimer similar to the following must be used: "These are my own opinions and do not represent those of the City." Occasional access to personal social media websites during work hours is permitted, but employees and agents must adhere to the guidelines outlined in the City's Computer Use policy 89 and the City's Respectful Workplace policy. Employees and agents should also review the Data Ownership section of this policy (below). There may be times when personal use of social media (even if it is off-duty or using the employee's own equipment) may spill over into the workplace and become the basis for employee coaching or discipline. Examples of situations where this might occur include: • Friendships, dating or romance between co-workers • Cyber-bullying, stalking or harassment • Release of confidential or private data; if there are questions about what constitute confidential or private data, contact your supervisor. • Unlawful activities • Misuse of city-owned social media • Inappropriate use of the city's name, logo or the employee's position or title • Using city-owned equipment or city-time for extensive personal social media use Each situation will be evaluated on a case-by-case basis because the laws in this area are complex. If you have any questions about what types of activities might result in discipline, please discuss the type of usage with your supervisor Data Ownership All social media communications or messages composed, sent, or received on city equipment in an official capacity are the property of the City and will be subject to the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act. This law classifies certain information as available to the public upon request. The City of Centerville also maintains the sole property rights to any image, video or audio captured while a City employee is representing the City in any capacity. The City retains the right to monitor employee's social media use on city equipment and will exercise its right as necessary. Users should have no expectation of privacy. Social media is not a secure means of communication. Policy Violations Violations of the Policy will subject the employee to disciplinary action up to and including discharge from employment. 90 Administrator/Engineer's Report enterVille January 24, 2018 +:.I�l7.7771 ADMINISTRATION Administrator Continuing Education Plan I will be attending the City Engineers Association of Minnesota's (CEAM) annual conference (Jan 24-26). This conference satisfies the continuing education requirements for my professional engineering licensure. I completed an online training course in Land Use Basics, through the League of Minnesota Cities. Having staff and elected officials take this course gives us a discount on our insurance, through the league. Social Media Presence On this agenda is a request for adoption of a City Social Media Policy, and authorization to open a Facebook page. Council Chambers TV System Upgrade A meeting has been set up with a vendor who gave us pricing info back in April. We will review that proposal and bring a refined scope and cost recommendation after further discussion with staff regarding our needs. City Hall Carpet At the request of City Council, our finance director was asked to comment on whether the carpet install would best fit under the 2017 or 2018 budget. Ellie said that either budget year could easily sustain the expense. City staff would like to complete the work in the early summer to utilize summer help to offset some of the furniture moving costs. Additionally, we will be evaluating whether other maintenance items, such as painting should be done before carpet is installed. 2018 City Council Goals A 2018 Goal Setting work session is scheduled for February 28th at 6:00 PM, with the regular City Council meeting to follow. Staff Meetings A City Staff meeting was held, discussing recent council directives, future agenda items for the council and other staff projects and goals. These meetings will be held monthly. STORMWATER/WETLAND Storm Water Capital Improvement Plan and Rate Study Much like the need for a Parks fund, a well thought out capital improvement plan and maintenance regimen is important in establishing a credible charge. Early in the new year, we will explore closing the loop on this issue. Local Water Plan A draft of the Local Water Plan will be presented by our consulting engineer at this meeting. We will not look to adopt the plan at this time, so that Council has a reasonable period to review the documents. After receiving comments from the City Council, we will revise the plan, prior to submittal to the Rice Creek Watershed District. The deadline for submittal is June of 2018. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT/PLANNING United Properties' 21st Ave. Distribution Center Developer's Agreement Fulfilment A Letter of Credit(LOC) has now been received, from United Properties for the overlay of Fairview Avenue. This means that United Properties has now fulfilled all of its obligations under the developer's agreement for 21st Avenue. Peltier Estates The developer and builder continue to negotiate with each other on the details of the developer's agreement and project costs. We are working with both to find economical solutions to help move the project forward. To date, the developer's agreement has not been signed, nor any securities posted. Ruffridge Johnson The sale of city owned property from the Commerce Drive Business Park to Ruffridge Johnson (RJ)Equipment Company appears to be moving forward. A meeting with RJ representatives, including owner, Jon Pederson, was held on January 10'to discuss the status of project approvals, permits and other logistics. On the City Council agenda are two items needed to keep the project on schedule: Rice Creek Watershed District Stormwater BMP Maintenance Agreement and a Conditional Use Permit. The current project timeline has a closing date on the sale of the property for April 3rd Due to the terms of some of the financing and tax incentive mechanisms being used, construction of the project will proceed quickly after the sale of the property, with completion in September of this year. SEWER AND WATER Lift Station 2 Rehabilitation Contracts have been drafted and sent to the contractor for execution. Downtown Water Main The application for funding through the Community Development Block Grant program was submitted on the 12th. This grant would fund the installation of water main and service hook-ups for the downtown area. PUBLIC WORKS/STREETS Lino Lakes LaMotte Neighborhood Street and Utility Reconstruction Lino Lakes city staff believes that a street project will be put forward, but may not include adding municipal water service. Labor Union Negotiations A closed session is planned for this meeting to discuss this matter. PARKS Skating Rink At the time of this report, Skate/Sled Night is still planned for Saturday, January 20th Dupre Artifact Agreement Consultant agreement has been signed. Work will begin shortly. Parks Capital Improvement Plan and Park Dedication Fee Study I attended the January Park and Rec Meeting to discuss the structure of Park Dedication Fees and the need for a comprehensive study to properly justify those fees. We will bring a proposal forward, for Council's review, to complete a formal Park and Trails Master Plan. Centennial School District Community Education I met with Community Education Director Cori Sendle to review their programs and share information about the city's recreation programming and facilities. A few ideas that came out of the meeting are: • Sand volleyball league utilizing city's court • Partnership with Bald Eagle Waterski Club for Community Ed Class • Community Ed programming utilizing city's skate park • Finding opportunities for gardening clubs around the city • Programming surrounding Dupre Artifacts • Promotion of City's Music in the Park Cori intends to attend the next parks and rec committee meeting to share some of her thoughts on these initiatives. PUBLIC SAFETY Fire Relief Association I attended the Fire Relief Association breakfast and quarterly meeting. The group reported strong financial performance in their investments and proudly paid out some retirees. Fire Steering Committee • The fire department ended the year significantly under budget(about 10%). • We received a favorable ISO rating (more info on that later) • Authorization for a 1-person, weekday, daytime duty crew was given • Year-end statistics were presented