HomeMy WebLinkAbout2018-02-28 CC Packet t enterviCCITY OF CENTERVILLE COUNCIL MEETING & JOINT
C
,e COMMITTEE GOAL SETTING MEETING
Wednesday, February 28, 2018
6:00 p.m. or shortly thereafter
COUNCIL MEETING
L CALL TO ORDER(6:00 PM)
1. Roll Call—City Council
2. Roll Call—Planning and Zoning Commission
3. Roll Call—Parks and Recreation Committee
II. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
III. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
IV. JOINT COMMITTEE GOAL SETTING MEETING(6:00 PM to 8:00 PM)
1. Staff Presentation
a. Open Meeting Law (Page 1)
b. Review of 2017 Goals and Accomplishments (Pages 2-15)
c. Draft 2018 Goals (Pages 16-26)
2. Council and Committee Discussion
3. Adoption of 2018 Goals
V. APPOINTMENTS/PRESENTATIONS
1. None
VL PUBLIC HEARING
1. None
VII. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
1. February 14, 2018 City Council Meeting Minutes (Pages 27-33)
VIII. CONSENT AGENDA
1. City of Centerville February 14, 2018 through February 28, 2018 Claims (Check
#31666-31681) (Page 34)
2. Centennial Lakes Police Claims through February 22, 2018 (11836-11860) (Page 35)
3. Centennial Fire District Claims through January 22, 2018 (Check#8106-8130)
W/TASC, US Bank EFT,Wex Bank & Check#8112-8116 Payroll (Pages 36-37)
4. Adjustments to Insurance Coverage (Pages 38-40)
a. Coverage for 1737 Main Street
b. Fireworks Coverage
C. Municipal Tort Liability Waiver
5. Minnesota Rural Water Association Membership (Pages 41-43)
6. Centerville Lions Request for Special Event Permit on Personal Property, Raffle &
Temp. On-Sale Liquor License—(Cadillac Dinner, St. Gen's Community Parish, 6995
Centerville April 14, 2018) (Pages 44-45)
7. Request for Encroachment Agreement (Shed) & Grant of Easement (Storm Sewer
Pipe), 1667 Peltier Lake Drive (Page 46)
8. Massage Therapist License Renewal & Establishment License, Schlavin Chiropratic—
Ms. Lisa Kieselhorst (Page 47)
IX. OLD BUSINESS
1. Authorize Submittal of Local Water Plan to Reviewing Agencies (Met Council &
Rice Creek Watershed District) (Pages 48-90)
X. NEW BUSINESS
1. MN Department of Health Source Water Protection Implementation Grants (Pages
91-104)
2. Lift Station #2 By-Pass Pumping (Pages 105-106)
XL COUNCIL/ADMINISTRATOR ANNOUNCEMENTS
1. Administrator/Engineer Report (Pages 107-109)
XII. ADJOURNMENT
*REMINDERS**
P&Z Committee—Tuesday, March 6, 2018 —6:30 p.m. City Hall
P&R Committee—Wednesday, March 7, 2018 — 6:30 p.m. City Hall
—Wednesday March 14 2018 —6:30 p.m. City Hall
City Council Meeting
—Wednesday, March 28, 2018 —6:30 p.m. City Hall
City Council Meeting
Shake Your Shamrock Run, Saturday, March 17, 2018 — 8:00 a.m. (Kelly's Korner Sponsors)
m Recycling Saturdays: 9:00 a.m. — 12:00 p.m. (Green Lights Recycling, 1525 — 99th Lane N.E.,
Blaine)
March 10, April 14, May 12, June 9, July 14, August 11, September 8, October 13, November 10 &
December 8, 2018
What is a "Meeting" under Open Meeting Law?
A "meeting" is where a quorum of a City Committee or the Council discuss, decide, or receives information
relating to the body's official business. "Meetings" must be Open to the Public.
MEETINGS:
• Physical gatherings LEGAL*
• '.. Group emails—"Reply All"'.. ILLEGAL
• Serialcommunications ILLEGAL
o' Phone/texts from one Member to the next, and to the next ILLEGAL
o' "Chain emails" sent from one Member to the next,and to the next ILLEGAL
Why are these"Meetings" ILLEGAL?
*Lawful meetings require Notice to the Public (Time and Place)
• Regular Meetings
o Per a schedule on file at City Hall
• Closed or Special Meetings
0 3-days posted notice
0 1-day mailed notice to Members
0 3-days mailed/published notice to anyone requesting notice of special meetings
• AND, written materials used by the body during a meeting must be available to the Public
What is NOT a "Meeting" under the OML?
• Social gatherings ...
• City Training ...
... where official business of your body is NOT discussed
Penalties
• Violator to pay$300 fine per violation (City cannot pay this)
• Violator Forfeits office after 3+separate, intentional violations
• City to pay reasonable costs, disbursements, and attorney fees up to $13,000
o Sometimes, City must pay mandatory Attorney fees for obvious violations
*** Watch out for the "meeting after the meeting"or the "meeting in the parking lot" ***
Best Practices
Gatherings: Why take the risk?
If you think you'll be gathering with other Members of your body, simply ask Staff to post notice of a
potential public meeting. In the past we have posted meeting notices for park and skate events, funerals -
we once posted a meeting notice to hang out in Tom Lee's garage.
Emails: Let Staff do the emailing!
The City Administrator, Staff and Attorney can communicate with your entire body outside of a
meeting. If it is necessary to send information outside of a meeting, ask Staff to help by sending and
receiving emails with the entire body.
Always use your City email for City businessr avoid using your personal email or texting devices.
00
4 O
- N
00
F N
4 - /
1�
4 `
1 * i
i
i W
LU'` t LL
W LLI
Ica m
IOL
W
ir
� 1
N
I :
cc
I
I
I
I
u N
� Q
cu
+- -0 u
E o
c�
N O v = O .�
L1J •- 0 o U 0 O "Zcn vi O w i
ca
NE cu
oce Ln E E �
p ° E cn
0 v ca a)
_ � u ON
U U O OU 4-J
U 0N 0
L—n
Lro
/ /
}' c:cL ° E v ca ca o >
'� O x O °' N '_ 4-+ N U O
N U N NO f6 N O!E< cM
NE a)
Ln O 'N D oLU 0 Q 'cn a�
4-J (n N E
O O :3 c w m .Q N _0 C6 O
V }' N O
U
cu E 'z7, ca m' v E +� >
> CLL i � '
CL
4- 12
0 > (3) U
( V O c> w N 4- w ca Q Q
cam '� U
0 m
N
U
0 oz
i
C: + O
O — U
U 4-J
v E �
N
O
> U N
O >.i
U Q
cn °' ca v
L1J v Y
00 Q LL
N
NO Hro
a--+ N U
U_
0 N - a m O N J O
W
O +a U
W � O �\ L E _ N N
t1A 0 +-' Q p N +-+
v 1 41 = N H > ate-+_~maxc
N � �
U� ° N N O >- O f6 a
u 0cn
L cVC ",
O X 0 0 N N 0 N N
u Ln
N N
V OH p o Hca OCa
� _0 N
0 L '� \ to a) +_+ f6 co
N i O Li-
a) O B JO -aIj E N w
— 0
L 0 Q N E a) U
.0 w -0-0 (3) E
p LL
0 -0 , a� � O� 3
O ca nn -0 D W Q� a - 0 U � tto t
E cr— CLN a� O Q W f6 1 C N V) •o 4'
N N Q U i a--+ 'O U �i p E� O U
D� 0 ��
� o �
> N U
o;6
a�
\ —
/ (�j N
+.,
L.
•� �` � v
v a--+ E
v
N 4-j
Ln
N OO —
L t- o
.> N (D C: L ate-+ N U QLO
C ° Q N m S
� L pp 4)
o b.0 o
N ca
N
O M toQ
N � � � L
4—j Q) m YO .- Q� O Q U
c6
V � L S_
t1A ca CSA � N
N 'N \ 3: bb
DQ)o Q) — O ro U U - L1
U I +_+ N V) _ > N
)-0 Ln 0 L 0
4 -
}' _0 � o x CL :
0
a) Q an
^, U
ro �' o
o ro
w CL .
06
N
N
N
O
2
� N
N
O E
v O
w cu _
0
U �
Q O
— 0 O C6
+j
Ln
O - ° ca
'U m U_
O O N
O 'N °_ "
� N
u
N (D U
A a"i CO
U N
co
� t1A
C ^ O
0 (3)E - (1) U
U
N
4-j N C N Z
E >
0
0 U
N
f6 N
L
u (D
\ 0/ z
o p N
w v
Q ° m
UUN
U N __
O — >
N o
°2$ _ " '
4-J
4-JN
U N z N N 06
0 JN �
1 > a N +-+
E i N LU w
N
V O — �-+
co U
U w to .i to D O E i
to a) O O r- c .- >- E O
ON LL 3:
O4-JN ii L p U
t1A
U o °' t�lp
E c " 4, m 4�
O Ln� +_+ -0a a
.:.aL) O D O 0 C t C N O O
O u U u U N w C w U u L )
N +� U p z z a Ln m N = z �Az
cl:� LL U
O
m
� N
� � U
E 0
O Q
O
_0 — cn
U
OCL Z
W
O (!
1� o 4-j J +-j
O E cn
Q o
p m co
CSA bD V N
z � � or_ o
o a) au >. �, au
O 0 �Y }'
U
V 41 — U L
++ O U = I.L
N _ u
J +� Q a--+ 41 O LL
U 7 N }, >- U U U
No O ao N ao a,o
ca N
aO
--+ i — = U O a O a--+ O
> i (� Q
N i Q ateo 0 Z D O 2 w i O
>O r >O
' 4-j 4-
U L�
a,
V
a,
D
v
E
D
w
bo
CLW
3 J
O x
a/
> Q
0
L1J t L
O
W
a/
O —
LA
a, E
D N aO
O_ a) a)
O to V
w (6
fO o
t oCLcn n
v c6 1 c C E
3 o v
N a, 2 N
a-+ i ago ?
0 i E o o U Z
in D ai n -0 - N -0 N o N
OE
N s N
0 '� c C
tin to
L ++ Q E ha
(U t N J
VI Q E •U vI a-+ 0
D O +O+ m 111
o O N ai 0 7 ?
A c •� N C N c6 c OA
I \ v
3 c o
+-+ o o
U
O N cu: Q °
Oa, —
O o U tia +� 0 a-+ ^ c6 E v
U O +
U � o a m N °' O � O � C c p E v
Q LU
N c m = a) cn E c6 v y c N N CLO ai () >
No 0 3 v cn O U v O Mo C v
V LL H d' V .L [Y O W O 3 [Y
N O u > �_
L to a'•' •VIU >
7 N 7 j
v /
W
N
a--+
L
Q
0CL
_0 >-
C: bn
O
LL O
O
C6 U
UCD
N �
z
.E L
- L U
O 0
4-J Q O
.O
z � i �
CL Cr
O ° � -0
o � 0
N
OU w CL
N
N
C6
U 0 N
1� 'U E
E
E
Q O U E
i OU
LLv
0 -0
}' \
E N O
iN }, N
4 a, o •3 •E
•— 4-j '�
N o
z
E EQ o
� o o � N
O \ U 06
u O a) U }N-_,
=; —
z •� �, au
E E
'� U
O Ov U � ca
4 bn —
•� 0 i U
ci U 4—jU
O
C� °6 N
L1J 0
O 'N
� .Nm
0 N _0
cu �
ca
DC E
cu E
0 0- E
o an O o
Q U
m W
N
06
U— °
O co m
E o
O }, i
ca 4-j >
O
C: cu
.�
O cu u
V Ecu
.> CU
w N
cu
O _
� 4-j 4-
4 �
j
N N N
Lu M w
0
L1J N O � +N-+
Ln
i
N E O
}' O
OU O
4 J -0 -0 °
O N N N U r
LL N ate-+ 0 O
r� N C: ._ N Z,- 4-j
N N O
.O -a 0- 0-
cu
V
a--+ � ca � � aA ca
N O M
z � co
'> Ln
'v < N two
OLnQL+n-'
u '� o a�
L 'n � � ._ O
z
c .Q 4� � >
O _ � O
aA O
U 4-
4-J M C6 i 0 N 4-1
o � xO O
a- u m U U w Z
0
N
W N
U
° _ N
m .E N
L
U_ C: CL
O O N
O U
CL w (1)
N +o
a� (1) c j
U O
O - �O
V
N
z
- � w
O U
a--+
r n - j 0 �
v _0 � �� Ln
a)z .
> � 4-j
o
a o co
O �
._ � UN
° j
E °
w > w U U
O
N
O
4-1
(3)
w i ca
+�-1 `n O
U
ca 4-J �
� ca O :t
° z OQ
O o a, o ° o
U a_+
}, NN(3)
N O O G
U �
.� U i
4- w 4-1
N > > N
O ca M
z = . _ .
T_
(A T_
.0 N •� L
+-+
:3 :3
� DC U
E .N .F
cn � a..,
v �
O 'O O 4-j O
' a--+ =
U .— U
ONE Ln
� o E ra
cu Ln =;
W Ln
U U N
an m
4-1
O .N �p > N
U � ca > U
O
N
3
0
o
d
^� W
H
Z
W
V
c _
co
j � o
cn �
u� W D cA U
3
o �
0
V
U
N
U
N
U
(6
U
cu
Q O
cr
W O cu
Q 0) > Q
U (1)N Q
( U j Cli
a�
O�
c
Q N4-0J
U j N -Fn
O U `� U FN
O U CDL (LI—) .Q N O Ncu
(B
W L J
= O U
N Q (6 0 E
cn 23
O •�
L
70 N Ew E D
0 U
•a) N
N
Q N
O
y-- W
0 C)
0
r � W
}r C/)
C/) L
W co � a
V
0
cn
L. O cn
O Oa) cn (D U E
U) O a)
cn 0)
n o o > N
C:
ocn
0'
cn N
o _ o
U U_cn
cn cn
N p N (D Q
L (B > p M
CD- c�
• _0 E
:> O � a�
� Lcn a) cn _ O cn
L
cn
L N cn
O
p Q X Q
W U) U D W }, D W
(6 U)
Q
3
L
C
Z
V
U
'L
O
O
U
U
L
W N
4-0
_0 +-!
cn m E _
� m O O co
cn L U N Cn N
'NO U N
cn U � a
to L � U co m0
� N
L cm O
cliJ — �
N p cn 4O w
-0 +� O_ (B O
N J E (D n 7
+-+ O U O
pz (6421 Co
U N �'
(D 4-0 C � W > Co Co
mcn a- � Of w 0
> (6 N
W z .
ct
O
L
O
U
O
L
0
O
u N
Z3
n w
bDbD
_u
t.0 Q U
4A cn r O a J 0
Q)
� +-+ Y cn c6 41
p 0 41 d i O
m 'p H O ) =
L OC: Q 41 N
cc 0 — U �
O i
LU M
+-� U
O O '- ~ t1A 0 b. i
Q O D 'i 41 cn
Q 2 i Q m oC Q w
LU
p U
1Mm" -
7
ct
O
0
LL
U b.0
L
0
LO
L Q) N
U
Zb. O
LZ � � •cn
bD Q) 41
L O Q U
E LL E C: U
O cin
L 0 (6
�
O _� U
U L N Q O
O
� L
bDto
Q) C6 = O
cc LL
L U N 41
E O O 41 -0
bD
Om O L 41
c: Q
� wE 0) 0) _0 E
09—
W
E�
O
C�
z
O
x
c
CITY OF CENTERVILLE
CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
February 14, 2018
6:30 p.m.
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, the City of Centerville held their regularly scheduled
meeting of February 14, 2018 at City Hall, 1880 Main Street.
PRESENT: Mayor Jeff Paar
Council Member Russ Koski
Council Member D. Love
Council Member Matt Montain �Council Member Steve King lNot ABSENT: None.
STAFF: City Attorney Kurt Glaser
City Administrator/Engineer Mark Statz
COUNCIL MEETING
L CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Paar called to order 6:30 p.m.
II. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
III. PUBLIC INPUT
IV. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
Mayor Paar stated that Checks#31658-31665 were added to Item #1., Consent Agenda.
Motion by Council Member Koski, seconded by Council Member Montain to approve the
Agenda as Amended. All in favor. Motion carried.
V. APPOINTMENTS/PRESENTATIONS
1. None.
VI. PUBLIC HEARING
1. None.
VII. APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES
27
City of Centerville
Council Meeting Minutes
February 14,2018
1. January 24, 2018 City Council Meeting Minutes
Mayor Paar provided Council with an opportunity for amendments.
Council Member Koski requested that Shaper Homes be spelled correctly "Sharper Homes"
under the Monthly Administrator's Report, paragraph 2 and Mayor Paar requested that under the
Monthly Administrator's Report, paragraph 3 the second "the" should be changed to "they" on
page 6 of 7.
Motion by Council Member Montain, seconded by Council Member Koski to Approve the
January 24, 2018 Council Meeting Minutes as Per Stated Above. All in favor. Motion
carried.
VL CONSENT AGENDA
1. City of Centerville January 24, 2018 through January 24, 2018 Claims (Check
#31633-31657)W/Voided Checks #31652 & 31654 & (Check#31658-31665)
2. Centennial Lakes Police Claims through February 6, 2018 (Check#11806-11835)
3. Centennial Fire District Claims through January 22, 2018 (Check#8099-8105)
4. Ordinance#89, Second Series, 2018 Fee Schedule: Water Rate Tier
5. P & R Recommendation to Donate $200 to Centennial Community Education
Council Member King desired to pull Item #5 for discussion.
Motion by Council Member Montain, seconded by Council Member Koski to Approve
Items #14 as Presented. All in favor. Motion carried.
Administrator Statz stated that Ms. Sendle, Centennial School District #12, Community
Education appeared before the Committee and presented a proposal for offering a skateboarding
session/class and anticipated that the fee would be deemed excessive, hindering participation.
She originally proposed that P & R partner with Community Education for providing a subsidy
for Centerville participants of approximately $20/individual with a maximum of 10 participants.
Subsequent to lengthy discussion by the Committee they desired to provide a $200 flat donation
to the District's Community Education Department. Administrator Statz also stated that they
desire to utilize some of Centerville's park amenities such as the sand volleyball court along with
LaMotte Park's skate park.
Council Member King questioned the amount of participation needed and Administrator Statz
stated six (6) at a minimum and thirty (30) at maximum. Council Member Montain stated that he
is the Liaison to the Committee, that Ms. Sendle provided the Committee with a well organize
presentation and that they unanimously desired to work with them with this donation and Movie
in the Park, advertising and alike. Ms. Sendle questioned whether there was a desire to offer the
skateboarding session during Fete des Lacs and she stated that she would be attending their
meeting to ascertain their decision. She felt that combined advertising would be an advantage
for both parties.
Page 2 of 7
28
City of Centerville
Council Meeting Minutes
February 14,2018
Motion by Council Member Montain, seconded by Council Member King to Approve Item
#5 as presented. All in favor. Motion carried.
VI. OLD BUSINESS
1. Request for Proposals (RFP) Garbage, Refuse, Recycling & Yard Waste Services
Attorney Glaser stated that Interim City Administrator Larson negotiated to extend Waste
Management's current contract through June, 2018 allowing ample time for the hiring of a new
City Administrator and receipt of RFPs. Attorney Glaser stated that between himself, Interim
Larson and City Administrator Statz it is felt that the submitted RFP is ready to be forwarded to
haulers to secure bids. He stated that he was looking for Council direction regarding the
inclusion of the City billing for services along with the bi-monthly billing for municipal utilities.
He stated that the RFP did contain both the hauler providing those services and the City.
Attorney Glaser stated that the City is looking to secure a five (5)year contract.
Lengthy discussion took place regarding ownership of containers and the benefit of the City
owning them which provides for the ability of a potential hauler to commence with little up-front
expense. Attorney Glaser stated that the RFP and contract for services state that the hauler will
provide a receptacle to a new account/resident and that same will become the City's. Council
Member Montain questioned the amount of haulers that would be receiving the RFP or whether
the League would be receiving it. Attorney Glaser stated that all haulers that are submitting for
this RFP must submit a bid bond and be licensed through the State of Minnesota. Council voiced
concern for contractors operating under numerous names, retaining the language regarding price
distinction between City billing and vendor billing, providing both receptacles (waste/recycling)
at every park
Administrator Statz stated that commercial businesses and apartment properties may hire an
alternative hauler from the City's contracted hauler and they should be recycling but are not
required to.
Motion by Council Member Montain, seconded by Council Member King to Approve the
Presented Request For Proposal and Forward Same to Potential Vendors. All in favor.
Motion carried.
2. 2040 Comprehensive Plan Discussion
Mr. Eric Maas, WSB, introduced himself to Council, provided them with a presentation and
reviewed Chapter 1, Community Profile and Chapter 2, Goals and Policies of the 2040
Comprehensive Plan.
Mr. Maas stated that Met. Council has estimated that the City's population will have a slight
growth of 149 with an overall population being slightly over 4,000 in 2040. Mr. Maas also
stated that this does not prohibit the City for planning for a much larger growth. Mr. Maas stated
that he has reviewed the two (2) chapters with the Planning & Zoning Commission, were present
at Fete des Lacs and obtained public input regarding avenues to pursue from the public. He
Page 3 of 7
29
City of Centerville
Council Meeting Minutes
February 14,2018
explained that the Commission looked at varies zoning such as the Church property or property
located near the lake, properties located along CSAH14 as areas for possible redevelopment in
the future. Discussion ensued regarding current restrictions within the downtown area for
expansion of existing homes associated with the Downtown Redevelopment Project which is no
longer viable, possibility of rezoning along Main Street for Mixed Use and development along
20th and 21st Avenues.
Mr. Maas stated that Met. Council identified slightly over 100 acres that could be developed
within the community with their forecast of an additional 150 residences. Lengthy discussion
ensued regarding densities (low, medium and higher densities), affordable housing and the
underlining requirement of satisfying Met Council's estimates but planning for growth above
what they are planning. Mr. Maas stated that the City of Centerville is scored lower than other
communities due to lack of mass transit and service availability. Mr. Maas also stated that Met.
Council does not believe that the City of Centerville will achieve its buildout until sometime
after 2040. He also stated that the City of Centerville is on the suburban edge and has a
designation of a 3 which is the same designation of Lino Lakes. He reported that the City of
Hugo has a duel designation and that they are very unique.
Administrator Statz stated that the City has the ability to provide alternative housing types or
more of what the market is calling for when it is calling for it. Mayor Paar stated that
Superintendent Deitz has stated that the School District is in demand by property owners and is
attracting new development within the district.
Mayor Paar requested that Council review the information provided, contact staff with questions
or recommendations and the plan would again appear before them for review prior to adoption.
Mayor Paar commended WSB, the Planning & Zoning Commission and staff for working
diligently on the two sections.
Mr. Maas stated that he would be meeting with the Parks & Recreation Committee in March to
discuss parks and trails. Mr. Maas reviewed the timeline for the 2040 Comprehensive Plan and
its submittal to RCWD in June and Met. Council in December.
IX. NEW BUSINESS
1. None.
X. COUNCIL/ADMINISTRATOR ANNOUNCEMENTS
1. Monthly Administrator's Report
Administrator Statz stated that he had not had an opportunity to complete his report prior to the
meeting so he would provide Council with a brief update. He stated that Staff has been working
with neighboring communities regarding arranging for a more robust social media presence, took
ownership of a google map site, toured the City of Blaine Council Chambers to review new cable
equipment and has spoken with several vendors regarding the City's needs for taking advantage
of the HD aspects of the cable system, held monthly staff meetings, that the Local Water Plan
Page 4 of 7
30
City of Centerville
Council Meeting Minutes
February 14,2018
would be forwarded to Council again for approval and submission in June, that Ruffridge-
Johnson issues would be discussed during the closed session, that a meeting was held with Mr.
Rich DeFoe and a developer regarding the construction of high-end, detached townhomes on the
Waterworks site and his property with future discussions planned for P & Z. He stated that he
has been in contact with Mr. Brass who has stated that several interests have been shown in the
downtown area for townhomes, that the P & Z Commission has been requested to consider pool
covers rather than current code requirements for fencing with Building Official Palzer being
opposed to due to safety issues. He reported that Lift Station #2 rehabilitation has commenced,
that the City was unsuccessful with receiving CDBG funding for the downtown water project at
this time. County Commissioner Sivarajah continues to encourage submittal for future projects.
He stated that work continues regarding Local 49 labor negotiations, skate/sled night, Dupre
Family artifacts, working with Centennial School District Community Education, the Fire
District and Police Department. Administrator Statz reported a house fire had taken place
recently on Prairie Drive with four(4) departments responding. He stated that all individuals and
pets survived with no firefighters receiving injuries. He also stated that the home was a total
loss.
Administrator Statz give a brief review of a recent Centennial Fire Steering Committee meeting
stating that participation for a duty crew has been unsuccessful and that Chief Lundstrom is
continuing with evaluation of the program and alternatives for day time staffing. He also
provided a brief overview of a recent Centennial Lakes Police Governing Board meeting where
Mrs. Patricia Clearence was recognized as Chaplain for the Centennial Fire District. He stated
that she has received 10 months of training and has been working with previous Police Chief
Heckman as a Chaplain. He also reported that the body camera program has been working well
and assisting in prosecutions. He also stated that there were several recruits in training with one
(1) officer finishing training shortly.
Mayor Paar started that more departments are reporting the increased use of Narcan with the
prevalence of opioid usage. He stated that the department has saved six (6) lives in the last 18
months and that the cost of the medication is $35/does with some departments in the state not
carrying the medication due to its cost. Discussion ensued regarding staffing levels of the police
department, employment/advancement opportunities, etc. He stated that Chief Coan is proactive
in maintaining proper staffing and needs of the department.
Coucil Member King reported that the Cable Commission would be meeting the following week.
Council Member Koski stated that he attended the Anoka County Local Government meeting
where discussion was held regarding small cell towers and suggested that the City continue its
review of new legislation. Attorney Glaser stated that the City of Bloomington has been in the
forefront for policies regarding this issue and that he anticipated some slight modifications in the
upcoming legislative session. He also stated that concerns have been brought forward regarding
Met. Council's governance, representation, transparency and reform with additional information
coming in the future, Anoka County economic initiatives and proposals for adding a third lane to
Highway 10 and eliminating some traffic control signals. He also reported that the Planning &
Zoning Commission held healthy discussion regarding the updated Comprehensive Plan and its
draft planning.
Page 5 of 7
31
City of Centerville
Council Meeting Minutes
February 14,2018
Council Member Montain stated that the Parks & Recreation Committee discussed the January
20 skating/sledding evening along with planning the February 10 party.
Mayor Paar stated that the Centerville Lions were requesting volunteers to assist in drilling holes
for their ice fishing contest scheduled for February 17, 2018 and that volunteers should report to
Kelly's Korner at 6:00 a.m. for a free breakfast prior to drilling. He also stated that attendance
was lower than usual at the January 20 skating/sledding event due to lower temperatures, the
beginning of the Olympics and the St. Paul Winter Carnival. He commended the Committee for
their work. He reported that he would be attending a legislative breakfast at the Centennial
School District High School where Representative Runbeck and Sentator Chamberlain had been
invited to provide an update on school funding. He stated that the high school seniors would be
participating in a volunteer day by providing services in their communities and that if the City
desired their services for park cleaning or other areas to provide that information to the school as
soon as possible.
Mayor Paar stated that the previous week a child that attends Apple Academy had choked on a
meatball and owner Mrs. Kari LeTourneau had provided the heimlich maneuver saving the
child's life. He stated that Fox9 News had recently completed a news segment on the item and
he desired to thank Mrs. LeTourneau for her heroism, training and quick action.
Recess to Closed Exec. Session 8:25 p.m.
XI. CLOSED EXECUTIVE SESSION
(Meeting minutes will become available once negotiations have been completed and an
agreement is ratified).
Mayor Paar closed the Closed Executive Session at 9:06 p.m. and reopened the Regularly
Scheduled Council Meeting, reporting that discussion was had regarding the renewal of the
Local 49er's Union Contract.
XII. ADDITIONAL OLD BUSINESS
1. Local 49er Union Contract
Action was taken on the Union Contract in Closed Session.
2. Pay Plan & Matrix for 2018— See Above
Action was taken on the Pay Matrix/Pay Plan during the Closed Session.
XIII. ADJOURNMENT
Page 6 of 7
32
City of Centerville
Council Meeting Minutes
February 14,2018
Motion by Council Member Montain, seconded by Council Member Koski to Adiourn the
Regularly Scheduled Meeting of January 24, 2018 at 9:21 p.m. All in favor. Motion
carried.
Respectfully submitted by City Clerk, Teresa Bender
Page 7 of 7
33
CITY OF CENTERVILLE 02/22/18 12:12 PM
Page 1
Check Detail - February 28, 2018
Check
Date Check# Vender Name Comments Amount
2/23/2018 001143E PERA PERA W/H -PAY PERIOD 4
Check Nbr 001143 PERA $3,216.18
2/23/2018 001144E OPTUM BANK- H.S.A. H.S.A.W/H -PAY PERIOD 4
Check Nbr 001144 OPTUM BANK-H.S.A. $1,299.80
2/23/2018 001145E IRS/EFTPS FICA/MED W/H - PAY PERIOD 4 $3,723.34
2/23/2018 001145E IRS/EFTPS FED W/H -PAY PERIOD 4 $Z 198.89
Check Nbr 001145 IRS/EFTPS $5,922.23
2/23/2018 001146E MINNESOTA DEPT OF REVENUE STATE W/H - PAY PERIOD 4
Check Nbr 001146 MINNESOTA DEPT OF REVENUE $1,074.26
2/28/2018 031666 AMUNDSEN, KEVIN SKATE NIGHT SUPPLIES
Check Nbr 031666 AMUNDSEN, KEVIN $19.47
2/28/2018 031667 BLAINE BROTHERS,INC. 2001 STERLING TRUCK- REPAIRS
Check Nbr 031667 BLAINE BROTHERS, INC. $886.92
2/28/2018 031668 CENTENNIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT 12 DONATION TO SCHOOL DISTRICT COMMUNITY EDUCATION
Check Nbr 031668 CENTENNIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT 12 $200.00
2/28/2018 031669 DELTA DENTAL MAR 2018 DENTAL IN
Check Nbr 031669 DELTA DENTAL $655.70
2/28/2018 031670 GREEN LIGHTS RECYCLING,INC. RECYCLING EVENT-2-10-18
Check Nbr 031670 GREEN LIGHTS RECYCLING,INC. $517.69
2/28/2018 031671 INNOVATIVE OFFICE SOLUTIONS LL OFFICE SUPPLIES $2.93
2/28/2018 031671 INNOVATIVE OFFICE SOLUTIONS LL CREDIT MEMO-RETURN DRY ERASE BOARD -$14.01
2/28/2018 031671 INNOVATIVE OFFICE SOLUTIONS LL OFFICE SUPPLIES 25.27
Check Nbr 031671 INNOVATIVE OFFICE SOLUTIONS LL $14.19
2/28/2018 031672 INTERNATIONAL UNION OF OPERATI MARCH 2018 UNION DUES
Check Nbr 031672 INTERNATIONAL UNION OF OPERATI $103.50
2/28/2018 031673 MET. COUNCIL ENV.SERV. (SDS) MARCH 2018 WASTEWATER SERVICE
Check Nbr 031673 MET. COUNCIL ENV. SERV. (SDS) $19,408.64
2/28/2018 031674 METRO CITIES 2018 MEMBERSHIP DUES FOR CITY OF CENTERVILLE
Check Nbr 031674 METRO CITIES $1,864.00
2/28/2018 031675 METRO SALES INCORPORATED P.W. RICOH 2O455/P COPIER
Check Nbr 031675 METRO SALES INCORPORATED $168.83
2/28/2018 031676 NATIONWIDE RETIREMENT SOLUTION DEF. COMP W/H -PAY PERIOD 4
Check Nbr 031676 NATIONWIDE RETIREMENT SOLUTION $1,020.83
2/28/2018 031677 SHORELINE LANDSCAPING REIMBURSE FOR INV#21184
Check Nbr 031677 SHORELINE LANDSCAPING $575.00
2/28/2018 031678 SUMMIT COMPANIES ANNUAL SPRIKLER INSPECTION -P.W. $290.00
Check Nbr 031678 SUMMIT COMPANIES $290.00
2/28/2018 031679 TRI-STATE BOBCAT,INC. REPAIRS TO BOBCAT
Check Nbr 031679 TRI-STATE BOBCAT, INC. $884.86
2/28/2018 031680 VERIZION WIRELESS CELL PHONE SERV THRU 2-9-18 $155.04
2/28/2018 031680 VERIZION WIRELESS CELL PHONE SERV THRU 2-9-18 $51.67
2/28/2018 031680 VERIZION WIRELESS CELL PHONE SERV THRU 2-9-18 $51.67
2/28/2018 031680 VERIZION WIRELESS CELL PHONE SERV THRU 2-9-18 $51.67
Check Nbr 031680 VERIZION WIRELESS $310.05
2/28/2018 031681 XCEL ENERGY 1600 LAMOTTE DR-BALLFIELD LIGHTS-SERV THRU 2-4-18 $188.95
2/28/2018 031681 XCEL ENERGY 1889 CENTER ST-SEWER LIFT-SERV THRU 2-4-18 $32.32
2/28/2018 031681 XCEL ENERGY 7300 MILL RD-SERV THRU 2-4-18 $168.98
2/28/2018 031681 XCEL ENERGY 1600 LAMOTTE DR-WARMING HOUSE-SERV THRU 2-4-18 $180.62
2/28/2018 031681 XCEL ENERGY 1875 FOX RUN -PUMP-SERV THRU 2-4-18 $164.21
2/28/2018 031681 XCEL ENERGY STREET LIGHTS-SERV THRU 2-4-18 $1,977.82
2/28/2018 031681 XCEL ENERGY 1880 MAIN ST-51-4513991-9-SERV THRU 2-6-18 $1,014.64
2/28/2018 031681 XCEL ENERGY 1880 MAIN ST-51-4513991-9-CITY HALL/FIRE STATION - $586.44
2/28/2018 031681 XCEL ENERGY 7285 MAIN ST-SERV THRU 2-4-18 $57.37
Check Nbr 031681 XCEL ENERGY $4,371.35
Total Checks $42,803.50
34
CENTENNIAL LAKES POLICE DEPT Check Register-Police GL without invoice numbers Page: 1
Check Issue Dates: 2/7/2018-2/22/2018 Feb 22, 2018 01:48PM
Report Criteria:
Report type: Summary
GL Check Ck No Description Check
Period Issue Date Payee Amount
02/18 02/22/2018 11836 AMAZON OFFICE SUPPLIES TACTICAL RUBBE 17.98
02/18 02/22/2018 11837 ANOKA COUNTY BATTERY 800 MHZ RADIO EQUIPMEN 57.88
02/18 02/22/2018 11838 ANOKA CO TREASURY DEPT. MARCH BROADBAND 75.00
02/18 02/22/2018 11839 APPLIED CONCEPTS, INC DSR ERGONOMIC REMOTE CONTRO 367.00
02/18 02/22/2018 11840 ASPEN MILLS, INC CSO LL UNIFORM MISC 280.94
02/18 02/22/2018 11841 CENTENNIAL UTILITIES JAN UTILITIES 1,008.41
02/18 02/22/2018 11842 CENTURY LINK COMMUNICATIONS 115.79
02/18 02/22/2018 11843 CONNEXUS ENERGY ELECTRIC JANUARY 2,341.16
02/18 02/22/2018 11844 CONSOLIDATED COMMUNICATIONS PHONES FEB 377.70
02/18 02/22/2018 11845 DEARBORN NATIONAL MARCH LIFE/DISAB 1,490.63
02/18 02/22/2018 11846 DELTA DENTAL MARCH DENTAL 1,420.10
02/18 02/22/2018 11847 DON'S CIRCLE SERVICE, INC VEH MTC& REPAIRS 28.00
02/18 02/22/2018 11848 E C S I, LLC ANNUAL FIRE ALARM MONITORING 360.00
02/18 02/22/2018 11849 HEALTH PARTNERS MARCH HEALTH INS 10,631.73
02/18 02/22/2018 11850 HOLIDAY STATIONSTORES, LLC FUEL JANUARY 2,788.95
02/18 02/22/2018 11851 METRO SALES, INC COPIER CONTRACT 2/2018-2/04/19 1,096.99
02/18 02/22/2018 11852 NEAL A. NOREN JAN BLDG MTC HOURS 150.00
02/18 02/22/2018 11853 OFFICE OF MN IT SERVICES WAN SERVICES JANUARY 57.20
02/18 02/22/2018 11854 POPP COMUNICATIONS DSL LINE FOR WIFI 70.90
02/18 02/22/2018 11855 QUILL CORPORATION FOLDERS/BINDERS/MISC 150.32
02/18 02/22/2018 11856 CITY OF ROSEVILLE JAN PHONE CHARGES 357.80
02/18 02/22/2018 11857 SIGNS NOW CSO VEHICLE WRAP 749.32
02/18 02/22/2018 11858 TRANSUNION RISK&ALTERNATIVE INVESTIGATION EXPENSES JAN 25.00
02/18 02/22/2018 11859 TRUAX PATIENT SERVICES NARCAN NASAL SPRAY 1,500.00
02/18 02/22/2018 11860 THOMSON REUTERS-WEST PUBLISHI 2018 MN CRIMINAL LAW 657.00
Grand Totals: 26,175.80
M = Manual Check, V=Void Check
35
CENTENNIAL FIRE DISTRICT Check Register- FIRE GL Page: 1
Check Issue Dates: 2/7/2018-2/23/2018 Feb 23, 2018 04:29PM
Report Criteria:
Report type: Summary
GL Check Check Vendor Description Check
Period Issue Date Number Number Payee Amount
02/18 02/22/2018 8117 10293 ALL SAFE INC Annual Inspection, Station 1 (Fire 118.73
02/18 02/22/2018 8118 10850 ANOKA COUNTY TREASURY D Mar Broadband 112.50
02/18 02/22/2018 8119 30480 CENTENNIAL UTILITIES Jan Gas, Water(Station 1) 545.99
02/18 02/22/2018 8120 31137 CONNEXUS ENERGY 12/27-1/26 Electric(Station 1) 593.96
02/18 02/22/2018 8121 40045 DELTA DENTAL Mar EMS Coord. Dental Ins Prem 392.50
02/18 02/22/2018 8122 50050 DARREN ECKART AWARD CEREMONY SUPPLIES 41.97
02/18 02/22/2018 8123 60300 FIRE SAFETY USA, INC Adapter 115.00
02/18 02/22/2018 8124 80280 HEALTH PARTNERS Mar Hospital Ins Prem (Chief &As 1,528.32
02/18 02/22/2018 8125 90151 IMAGE PRINTING&GRAPHICS 250 biz cards(Patricia Clearence) 32.75
02/18 02/22/2018 8126 120331 LEAGUE OF MN CITIES INS TR 5/11/17 Kevin Stewart Workers C 300.20
02/18 02/22/2018 8127 120443 THE LINCOLN NATL LIFE INS C Mar EMS Coord. Life Ins Prem (E 343.61
02/18 02/22/2018 8128 180600 CITY OF ROSEVILLE Jan Phone Service 93.21
02/18 02/22/2018 8129 220200 VERIZON WIRELESS 1/5-2/4 Monthly Phone (Asst. Chie 53.56
02/18 02/22/2018 8130 230350 WHITE BEAR LOCKSMITH, INC Install Lock 165.00
02/18 02/22/2018 2018005 230325 WEX BANK Jan fuel 382.07
Grand Totals: 4,819.37
Check#8112-8116 Payroll
M = Manual Check, V=Void Check
36
CENTENNIAL FIRE DISTRICT Check Register- FIRE GL Page: 1
Check Issue Dates: 1/23/2018-2/6/2018 Feb 06, 2018 11:29AM
Report Criteria:
Report type: Summary
GL Check Check Vendor Description Check
Period Issue Date Number Number Payee Amount
02/18 02/06/2018 8106 11565 ASPEN MILLS, INC Navy Polo&Jacket 251.65
02/18 02/06/2018 8107 20120 BATTERIES PLUS BULBS 12V Battery(2 for Station 3) 41.90
02/18 02/06/2018 8108 30040 CDW GOVERNMENT, INC Toner for Station 3(all 4 colors) 512.48
02/18 02/06/2018 8109 30575 CITY OF CIRCLE PINES Annual Vital Work Life (2/1/18-1/3 1,457.00
02/18 02/06/2018 8110 50135 EMERGENCY RESPONSE SOL SCBA Flow Test & Face Piece Te 1,944.00
02/18 02/06/2018 8111 220200 VERIZON WIRELESS 12/16-1/15 Mobile Broadband 210.06
02/18 02/06/2018 2018003 200128 TASC Cobra 2018 Annual Fees 793.12
02/18 02/06/2018 2018004 210300 US BANK AED Superstore-AED Lifepak 835.29
Grand Totals: 6,045.50
M = Manual Check, V=Void Check
37
CITY OF CENTERVILLE
REQUEST FOR
COUNCIL ACTION entervi(Ce
E77
Agenda Item# Department: Requested Council Meeting Date:
Administration/Finance 2/28/18
TITLE OF ISSUE:
Adjustments to Property Insurance
BACKGROUND AND SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION:
Each year, we sit down with our insurance agent to review coverage options. Staff is recommending the
following changes:
- a. Drop coverage on Vacant Home/Garage at 1737 Main Street(+/- $640)
b. Elect coverage for Fireworks, through LMCIT, but not through vendor (previously, we have taken
coverage through both, which is duplicative). (+/- $250)
c. Liability Coverage -Waiver Form
COST AND SOURCE(S) OF FUNDING:
Total savings to General Fund+/- $940
REQUESTED COUNCIL ACTION:
Motion to approve changes to insurance elections.
For Clerk's Use:
SUPPORTED DOCUMENTS ATTACHED
Motion By:
Resolution Ordinance Contract Minutes Plan Map
Second By:
Vote Record: A e Nay
King Other(specify) Property Insurance Inventory
Love
Paar
Koski
Montain
Administration Department Use:
Refer to:
Consent
Tabled Until:
Regular
Other:
38
RENEWAL PROPERTYSCHEDULE FOR: CENTERAILLE,CITY 43F
,r x K
:
a
°uvv v xxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx xnnnnnnnnnnnnnn��n wwwwwwwwv wwwwwwwwv xxxxxxx xx xxxxxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxx xx�F €
k
�.: xxxxx xxxxxxxxx ---------------------------------——————
::: ,:.:..—r,.r,.r,.r,.r--- r,.r,.r,.r,.r:�— ..
0,j 63
kAM0 : :PAN 691 a..r.`s�...�..�.. t'"�,r K ms?*::f<,..�;:; � SWAMI K ,w= $01 Of } A
..Kx xxxxxxx: xxxxxxxxx .....x.xhx xxxxxxx xx xxxxxx... xxxx :.,.........
.xxxxx .. nnnnnnnnnn..>
s
"22R5z .z'e..a:<..r..::;F €..::,Kst>.=.€.r'r ;.;..;..; }.. �:.::.r:; ..K, :: v Ak
a #
uvv xx v .....................
xxxxxx inn �..�..�..�...n,.�..�..�..�..�..�..�...n,.�.. �. v..v
1785 PINS ER LAKFAM WT STATION
' x
v,:w_0 A— ,.:< s.,:.z ,:: ve=x ,. .... ..a ,.<. r"„,:ca.,. .ex, . r , a:.,:�.a.."..xv,...x....:' .x.r,.„......,,r,.m,” "r x'.,�. ,.v::w::; •,. .::,.::..�..
;x
L. z K:::::::
<,.<,.... ................................ nnnnnnn �...v xxxx xx x..
:;...................
xxxxxx
� : .
Eu
>< am! ansul K<t a,
..
� ,F......
Oil ,.s:.zK«t ..,..E,Mrx: NG-LE, r'K:::.K a.. vK ,,S 3# A
... xx xxx----- --- -----------
--- r
I . K
to
#.x..u. —
11 v..::..:
.. .. ......... ................
f
IM14 M4 7067 1 ME
.�:���;�:.lama uposo.s�:....:. .,::� .�k :�,...r .�.�.
pi
z
ROME
nm MK'
.An SPRI go so 3M
WMNC2 RAN F-1
5
x
---------xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx t". � v� . rC
ms. ,. xxxxxxx
vLm
y t
1SIAMMI Sams.
i K
SOR 64
IP
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Q K��
f O
�.. :H xxx 117,37M K :, K '..t. .KKv vv s x..K':: x ;sa s.
xx xxxxxxx x nxn nn n
xx, xxx x
xxxxxx -------------
r
gd C K �¥
v...AN est% KKK 05M� R £»
x::x n ..�, .... ...... .... uvvxxxxxxxxx�x7xxxx xxxxxxx xxxxxxx xxx xx xxx xxxxx .>
............ ..n::x::n
39
RENEWAL PROPERTY SCHEDULEFOR. CENTERVILLE,
027 02.7700720TH AVENUE �d $x.8,290 ���
,
1028 28 7145 MAIN
%028 7145 MAIN � 1 PARIS P # ci
40
�ee, F 0
x .. x x
----
od _
.. -. .x.
x
T
he ty would desire for Council consider again this 5' l membership. Membership is 25 and the
discounted training sessions,technical su information mailings, small loan options, etc.
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx-----------------------------------------
xWater iltl�oz
...................... --------------'l------------------------------------ ----------------- ------------
Ft
".x v
Council approval.
SUPPORTED DOCUNIS ATIACHED
"
xx xxxxxx__nnnnnnnnnnnnnn
'dote Reicor& Avo � xxxxxxx
K
K
xx J
xx xxxxxxxxxl aw.- �
x ___________________________________wnnn.............................................................v
x .. =. t
xx xxxx
----- xxxxxxx xxxxxxx x_
l . l -,In yr v et c l D partw �l (I w:
l
K
� KConsent � xxxxxxxx
H
Tabled Until,
Regular .v
-------------------
41
w i m,Rural
217 2"Avames SE
Lake,Elbow ME 56531
367-6792
218-695-5272
rax
Fahmary
21,2018
Teream Net
Assume Credit Cards Begins Visit
City of Cedarville jyModiddianentand we Me'pad oalloc'person.
1890 Mans street
Cemerville,MN 55039-9794 OR Make checks payablex Minnants Rural
Water .
Marabsenhip for December 2017 - December 2019
AOR
sActive Members, Iwas thani tersdCa— wx z m ¢ ,axitts __$2
as Igicapment Fund Conagrution,suggested minimum$25.00
Number of archnsoccomemions
Lyle Tautness Scholarship Fund Donation bectionso
Total due for low than 306 mmmalecamecticam
Fund Contribution, ted mmadauas$25.00
Lyle T 4
Total due for ever 306 comesperseareficom
OvIckepment Fund Cordribution, e $2.500
Lyle Treensw Scholarship Fund Donation,
TOW due a
Planes return a copy with paydreaL Thank yowl
*Endfi%municipalities the opportunity to pectimpate as a voting member on the Board of Dimmmy according to
Mixuarsda Rural W 4
"Equipeassa Mand cad
Everyday MXWA sleffearry leak clsamors,firm tracers,metal detectors, hydrant repair amin grawderm
promotereftev valvey, meters,comensdacradiclay slumpejudger,mr.dust are used to provideces-sics
assistance to You, We would appreciate a voluntary contribution to our Equimment Repair and Replacement Faind to
condoneto update mw Madepany to the latest technology and repay apenwrit as needed
MR WA also has an Emergency Response Wafirrthat asunder industry dosmumpuisess,bases,generators,flood
bags,and a contralparml that has been used in ascadepallnes due reftendick,formadisep or other .
71co equoment also needs to be reptersof and rapdama&Thin equipment way not have been used in your
MV bar we have to hajumparch to respond ifyou maw add calla Marskjamfor your tappers qfMA
The 34th MRWA Water sk W&sWmierheld
March 6-8,2018 at the St.Mod DICent.
42
xx
x
x�
an �n an
:A x
x xx
uw
vj wE
x x x
v
x x
43
CITY OF CENTERVILLE
REQUEST FOR
COUNCIL ACTION otelviffe
Agenda Item
Department, Requested Council Meeting Date.
Administration 2/28/2018
TITLE OF ISSUE-
A
If
drp
in
or
E74 3�EE
IS
ITL or i Property, Ralfle&Temp, 0 Sale Liquor License
r v
SpecialEvent,Permit on Private
'Pecial I-vent P told oil P
S
'10
;t S
,U
T PI
MOUND AND SL
BACKG UND AND TEPLERIENTAL INFORMATION-
Is
the
rville Lions are requesting the above approvals for their upcoming Cadillac Dinner to be held at St,
.c mry ille Lions a re no
he Came re q
Genevieve's Community Parish Center on Saturday, April 141, 2018 from 10:00 ti,rn, to I I p.m.
This is an annual event that has been taking place for numerous years without incident.
COST AND SOURCE(S) OF FUNDING:
Lions are requestingrvaiving of all associated fees
REQUESTED COUNCIL ACTION.
Recommend Approval of Special Event Permit, the and Temp. On sale Liquor License.
For Clerk'sUse-
SUPPORTED DOCUMENTS ATTACHED
Resolution Ordinance Contract Minutes Plan Map
VoteRecorda Ave
King Other(specify)_Quote
Pear
Koski
motthan
Administration [)apartment Use,
Consent
Tabled Until:
Regular :n
44
HAI
Dear Mayor and City Council of Centerville,
The Centerville Lions are requesting several City Pertnits for the 2018 Cadillac Dinner
and Raffle. We would like to ask again,that those permit fees be waived by City Council,
to the Centerville Lions Club, a non-profit organization in Cent "ll °
We're asking for the following permits in our event application.
1 to 4 Day Temporary/Event On Sale Liquor License:
St. Genevieve's Parish Center, 6995 Centerville Road, Saturday April 14th, 1 Sam to 11p
Raffle:
St. Genevieve's Parish Center, 6995 Centerville Road, Saturday April 14th, I Sam to
11 pin
We appreciate your help and support for this year's Cadillac Dinner and Ralf1e.
Thank you,
6q6�<,Vq4emlr-
Greg Kieselhorst
Centerville Lions President
45
CITY OF CENTERVILLE
REQUEST FOR
COUNCIL ACTION entervi(fe
Agenda Item# Department: Requested Council Meeting Date:
Administration 2/28/2018
TITLE OF ISSUE:
Request for Encroachment Agreement(Shed) & Grant of Easement(Storm Sewer Pipe), 1667 Peltier Lake Dr.
BACKGROUND AND SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION:
Mr. & Mrs. Paul Dentz have requested to extend an existing storm sewer pipe along their westerly side yard to
drain to the lake. While Staff were on site ascertaining whether they could successful complete the above, it
was determined that an existing shed located on the property was clearly located within the drainage/utility
easement.
Mr. & Mrs. Dentz were both agreeable to documents and signed them.
COST AND SOURCE(S) OF FUNDING:
N/A
REQUESTED COUNCIL ACTION:
Approve the encroachment Agreement(Shed) & Grant of Easement(Storm Sewer Pipe), 1667 Peltier Lake
Drive.
For Clerk's Use:
SUPPORTED DOCUMENTS ATTACHED
Motion By:
Resolution Ordinance Contract Minutes Plan Map
Second By:
Vote Record: Ave Nay
King Other(specify)
Love
Paar
R Koski
Montain
Administration Department Use:
Refer to:
Consent
Tabled Until:
Regular
Other:
46
CITY OF CENTERVILLE
REQUEST FOR
COUNCILACTION enterville
— (i
Agenda Its # Department: Requested Council Meeting Date-
a ` ,128/;an C
Administration 2,128/2018
TITLE OF I=LTE: T�
,s Xjas
FW,s7,sage,Es:wEblishnient&Massage Therapist License gonessals
BACKGRO'UND AND SUPP1,K]WENTAL INFORPIXTION:
Ms.Kieselhorst is again applying for the above licenses. All appropriate paper-work and fees have been
completed and submitted.
This is annual licensing and no incidents have occurred in the past.
COST AND SOURCE(S)OF FUNDING:
Associated Fees Have Been Obtained& Paid to the C'it y of Centerville
REQUESTED COUNCIL ACTION:
Recommend Approval of Massage Establishment&MassageThr apist License Renewal(s).
For Clerk's Use.
SUPPORTED DOCUMENTS ATTACHED
...............
Resolution Ordinance Contract Minutes P1 an Map
Vote Recent,- A
...... King Other(spccijl�)_QUOte
Love
Paar
Koski T
Montain
Administration Department Use:
Consent
Tabled Until-
Rest
filar
47
CITY OF CENTERVILLE
REQUEST FOR
COUNCIL ACTION entervi(Ce
E77
Agenda Item# Department: Requested Council Meeting Date:
Engineering/Public Works 2/28/2018
TITLE OF ISSUE:
Local Water Plan
BACKGROUND AND SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION:
Previously, our engineering consultant presented, to council, a draft of the Local Water Plan update (previously
referred to as the Surface Water Management Plan). Comments from that presentation have now been
addressed and the plan is ready for submittal to surrounding jurisdictions, the Rice Creek Watershed District
and Met Council.
COST AND SOURCE(S) OF FUNDING:
No direct cost for this action
REQUESTED COUNCIL ACTION:
Motion to approve submittal of the Local Water Plan to required agencies.
For Clerk's Use:
SUPPORTED DOCUMENTS ATTACHED
Motion By:
Resolution Ordinance Contract Minutes Plan Map
Second By:
Vote Record: A e Nay
King Other(specify) Draft Local Water Plan
Love
Paar
Koski
Montain
Administration Department Use:
Refer to:
Consent
Tabled Until:
Regular
Other:
48
0
Stantec
Centerville Local Water Plan
City of Centerville
2018
Project Number: 193803961
49
Stantec
CITY OF CENTERVILLE -2018 LOCAL WATER PLAN
Table of Contents
1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY....................................................................................................1.1
2.0 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................2.3
2.1 AUTHORIZATION...............................................................................................................2.3
2.2 PURPOSE OF THE PLAN..................................................................................................2.3
2.3 SCOPE 2.3
3.0 PHYSICAL ENVIRONMENT..............................................................................................3.5
3.1 LOCATION AND HISTORY................................................................................................3.5
3.2 GEOLOGY AND TOPOGRAPHY.......................................................................................3.5
3.3 SOIL CHARACTERISTICS.................................................................................................3.5
3.4 CLIMATE ............................................................................................................................3.6
3.5 LAKES AND OTHER SIGNIFICANT WATERBODIES.......................................................3.7
3.6 WETLANDS........................................................................................................................3.8
3.7 LAND USE..........................................................................................................................3.9
3.8 UTILITY SYSTEMS ............................................................................................................3.9
3.9 UNIQUE AREAS...............................................................................................................3.10
3.10ZONING AND FLOODPLAIN MANAGEMENT.................................................................3.10
3.11SHORELAND AND BUFFER ZONES ..............................................................................3.11
3.12GROUNDWATER CHARACTERISTICS..........................................................................3.11
4.0 HYDROLOGIC CALCULATIONS/MODELING PARAMETERS......................................4.13
4.1 WATER QUANTITY..........................................................................................................4.13
4.2 NURP STANDARDS.........................................................................................................4.14
5.0 WATER RESOURCE MANAGEMENT OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES..........................5.15
5.1 BACKGROUND................................................................................................................5.15
5.2 OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES .........................................................................................5.15
6.0 WATER RESOURCE MANAGEMENT PLAN .................................................................6.20
6.1 STORMWATER MANAGEMENT AND MAINTENANCE .................................................6.20
6.2 SUPPORT OF RCWD PROGRAMS AND EXISTING AGREEMENTS............................6.22
6.3 PHASE II NPDES MS4 PERMIT AND SWPPP................................................................6.22
6.4 TOTAL MAXIMUM DAILY LOAD (TMDL) STUDIES........................................................6.23
6.5 STORMWATER RUNOFF RATE CONTROL...................................................................6.23
6.6 MANAGEMENT OF CLEARWATER CREEK DITCH SYSTEM .......................................6.23
6.7 INTERCOMMUNITY FLOWS...........................................................................................6.24
6.8 EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL...........................................................................6.24
6.9 WETLAND MANAGEMENT..............................................................................................6.25
6.10FLOODPLAIN ADMINISTRATION ...................................................................................6.26
i
50
Stantec
CITY OF CENTERVILLE -2018 LOCAL WATER PLAN
6.11SHORELAND REGULATION ...........................................................................................6.26
6.12PUBLIC PARTICIPATION ................................................................................................6.26
7.0 IMPLEMENTATION PROGRAM......................................................................................7.27
7.1 ADMINISTRATION RESPONSIBILITY AND IMPROVEMENT PLAN..............................7.27
7.2 FINANCING OF MANAGEMENT PROGRAMS ...............................................................7.27
7.3 PUBLIC PARTICIPATION THROUGH INFORMATION AND EDUCATION ....................7.28
7.4 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN SUMMARY...............................................................7.28
8.0 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN .................................................................................8.29
8.1 INTRODUCTION ..............................................................................................................8.29
8.2 COMPLETED CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS....................................................8.29
8.3 FUTURE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS ...........................................................8.30
8.4 ONGOING STORMWATER MAINTENANCE ITEMS ......................................................8.31
9.0 STORMWATER CHARGES.............................................................................................9.34
10.OAMENDMENT PROCESS..............................................................................................10.36
10.1 REVIEW AND ADOPTION PROCESS...........................................................................10.36
10.2AMENDMENTS TO PLAN AND FUTURE UPDATES....................................................10.36
ii
51
Stantec
CITY OF CENTERVILLE -2018 LOCAL WATER PLAN
APPENDIX
Figures
FIGURE 1 Location Map
FIGURE 2 USGS Topographic Map
FIGURE 3 NRCS Soils Map
FIGURE 4 NWI (National Wetlands Inventory) Map
FIGURE 5 MLCCS Land Cover Map
FIGURE 6 Existing Land Use (City of Centerville 2040 Comprehensive Plan) Map
FIGURE 7 Future Land Use (City of Centerville 2040 Comprehensive Plan) Map
FIGURE 8 Official Zoning Map
FIGURE 9 Floodplain Map
FIGURE 10 Storm Sewer Map
FIGURE 11 Capital Improvement Plan Map
Reports and City Ordinances
Peltier and Centerville Lakes TMDL Report: Nutrient TMDL Report
Lino Lakes Chain of Lakes TMDL Report: Nutrient TMDL Report
City Code Chapter 155: Flood Damage Prevention
City Code Chapter 156, Section 133: Special Provisions Related to Development or
Building on Lands within 100 Feet of Centerville Lake, Peltier Lake, or Clearwater Creek
City Code Chapter 157: Erosion Control
Intercommunity Flows: Intercommunity Flows per RCWD District-Wide Model
52
Stantec
CITY OF CENTERVILLE -2018 LOCAL WATER PLAN
1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The City of Centerville, located completely within the Rice Creek Watershed District (RCWD), is
a largely residential community of 2.4 square miles. Roughly 85% of the City is developed.
Although complete development in the comprehensive plan is proposed to be staged over the
next 20 years, the market forces that drive development are difficult to forecast.
Because of the new development and redevelopment that could occur in Centerville, the
management priorities of the City have focused on issues surrounding development, such as
installation of proper detention facilities, erosion and sediment control of new construction sites,
providing adequate storm sewer capacity, and meeting water quality requirements.
The primary control of land uses within Centerville is determined by the City, however the
RCWD will work with the City to review permit land development permits, as well as road, trail,
utility construction and reconstruction. The RCWD has regulatory authority to enforce its goals
and policies in order to ensure water quality throughout the City.
Below is a summary of all the chapters contained in this report:
2.0 INTRODUCTION — Includes information about authorization and discusses the purpose
of the plan.
3.0 PHYSICAL ENVIRONMENT—Contains information about location, geology,
topography, soils, climate, waterbodies, land use, utility systems, and unique areas.
4.0 HYDROLOGIC CALCULATIONS/MODELING PARAMETERS —Discusses the required
parameters to be used in calculations and/or modeling done to determine compliance with
stormwater runoff rate controls or National Urban Runoff Program (NURP) pond guidelines.
5.0 WATER RESOURCE MANAGEMENT OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES— Includes a
description of all the objectives and associated policies to be adopted as part of the local water
plan.
6.0 WATER RESOURCE MANAGEMENT PLAN —Provides specific information as to the
proposed management method and framework to meet the objectives and policies outlined in
Chapter 5.
7.0 IMPLEMENTATION PROGRAM —Provides information as to the practical method for
implementing the programs discussed in Chapter 6.
8.0 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN — Describes capital improvement projects involving
the storm sewer system and provides cost estimates for each.
1.1
53
( Stantec
CITY OF CENTERVILLE -2018 LOCAL WATER PLAN
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
9.0 STORMWATER CHARGES —Summarizes the current stormwater fee structure.
10.0 AMENDMENT PROCESS— Describes the procedures involved in updating the plan
using amendments.
1.2
54
( Stantec
CITY OF CENTERVILLE -2018 LOCAL WATER PLAN
INTRODUCTION
2.0 INTRODUCTION
2.1 AUTHORIZATION
On May 10, 2017, the Centerville City Council authorized the preparation of a local water plan
(LWP) update to the previous 2012 surface water management plan (SWMP). Local water plans
will supplant surface water management plans; besides the change of name, these documents
serve the same purpose as a framework to manage the water resources within the City of
Centerville. The LWP is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan update for the City of
Centerville as well as the Watershed Management Plan and rules of the Rice Creek Watershed
District. Previously, the updates to the Local Water Plan and Comprehensive Plan were
asynchronous, but beginning with this 2018 Local Water Plan update, the Plan will be part of the
Comprehensive Plan and the two will be updated simultaneously.
2.2 PURPOSE OF THE PLAN
This Local Water Plan will serve as a comprehensive planning document to guide the City of
Centerville in conserving, protecting and managing its surface water resources. This plan has
been created to meet the requirements detailed in Minnesota Statutes 103B and Minnesota
Rules 8410, administered by the Board of Water and Soil Resources (BWSR). This plan is also
consistent with the goals and policies of the Metropolitan Council's 2040 Water Resources
Policy Plan, and the watershed district having authority within the City, the Rice Creek
Watershed District (RCWD). This plan may be periodically amended to remain current with local
practices and policies.
The intent of the legislated statute is to give the responsibility for water management to the local
units of government. The State and the Metropolitan Council have only minimal oversight roles
in watershed management or plan implementation.
2.3 SCOPE
This Plan serves multiple purposes including statutory and rule compliance. Minnesota Statute
103B.235 defines content for local water plans. According to the statute's text, each local plan,
in degree of detail required in the watershed plan, shall:
(1) describe existing and proposed physical environment and land use;
(2) define drainage areas and volumes, rates, and paths of stormwater runoff;
(3) identify areas and elevations for stormwater storage adequate to meet performance
standards established in the watershed plan;
(4) identify regulated areas; and
(5) set forth an implementation program, including a description of official controls, and as
appropriate, a capital improvement program.
2.3
55
( Stantec
CITY OF CENTERVILLE -2018 LOCAL WATER PLAN
INTRODUCTION
Minnesota Rules 8410, administered by the Board of Water and Soil Resources, provide more
detail on local plan content. Though the BWSR guidance applies specifically to watershed
management organizations and watershed districts, this guidance has historically been used to
frame expectations for municipal plans. According to Rules 8410, local plans must provide or
address:
(1) Executive summary
(2) Land and water resource inventory
(3) Impact on other units of government
(4) Establishment of goals and policies
(5) Assessment of problems
(6) Implementation program
(7) Implementation priorities
(8) Plan contents; amendments
(9) Annual reporting requirements
2.4
56
( Stantec
CITY OF CENTERVILLE -2018 LOCAL WATER PLAN
PHYSICAL ENVIRONMENT
3.0 PHYSICAL ENVIRONMENT
3.1 LOCATION AND HISTORY
The City of Centerville is situated in the southeast region of Anoka County, Minnesota. Figure 1
illustrates where the City is situated within the Twin Cities seven-county metro area. The City is
adjacent to Centerville Lake and Peltier Lake and is surrounded by the City of Lino Lakes. Its
proximity to Minneapolis and St. Paul makes Centerville a convenient residential location.
Residents and businesses have easy access to Interstates 35E. Location and access will
continue to keep Centerville's business and residential population stable. Historical population
and population projections are shown in Table 3.1.
TABLE 3.1 -CENTERVILLE POPULATION
2010 3,792 1,315
2020 3,840 1,400
2030 3,930 1,450
2040 4,060 1,500
Source: Metropolitan Council 2040 Water Resources Policy Plan
3.2 GEOLOGY AND TOPOGRAPHY
The City is in the northern portion of the Rice Creek Watershed District. The land is generally
flat with major drainageways and creeks discharging into Peltier and Centerville Lakes. The
ground elevation in the City ranges from approximately 912 feet to 886 feet NGVD, with the
lowest areas located near the lakes. The USGS topographic map for the area is provided in
Figure 2.
3.3 SOIL CHARACTERISTICS
The NRCS Soil Survey of Anoka County indicates that soils in the area are mostly of the
Nessel-Dundas-Webster association — nearly level to gently-sloping, moderately well-drained
and poorly-drained soils formed in loamy glacial till. The water table is noted as seasonally high
in most of the soil types listed for this area. The soil survey shows several divisions of soil types
within the City.
The Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) has established a series of soil groups
based on infiltration rates of the soil:
3.5
57
( Stantec
CITY OF CENTERVILLE -2018 LOCAL WATER PLAN
PHYSICAL ENVIRONMENT
HYDROLOGIC SOIL GROUP A - Low runoff potential, high infiltration rate
HYDROLOGIC SOIL GROUP B - Moderate infiltration rate
HYDROLOGIC SOIL GROUP C - Slow infiltration rate
HYDROLOGIC SOIL GROUP D - Very slow infiltration rate, high runoff potential
The runoff potential of an area is determined using these general soil characteristics in
combination with land use classification, vegetation of the area, and rainfall intensities as
determined from various design storms. As illustrated in Figure 3, the City contains a wide
geographic variability of hydrologic soil groups, with most the City being in the B and C
categories.
3.4 CLIMATE
Centerville has a climate that is fairly uniform. Summers are warm, with a mean temperature of
70.7degrees in June, July, and August. Winters are cold, having a mean December, January,
and February temperature of 16.8 degrees. About 70% of the precipitation occurs in the period
of April through September. The yearly precipitation total is 27.9 inches.
Climate data for the Twin Cities are published by the National Weather Service (NWS) station at
Chanhassen, MN. The NWS is a branch of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration (NOAA). Table 3.2 provides a summary of average precipitation data for the Twin
Cities.
TABLE 3.2-AVERAGE MONTHLY PRECIPITATION, 1971-2016
inche 0.89 0.84 11.79 2.67 13.46 4.52 13.85 4.15 12.79 2.24 1.71 1.12 30.03
Rainfall frequency estimates are used as design tools in water resource projects. Rainfall
frequencies are summarized in the National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration's
(NOAA) Atlas 14-Point Precipitation Frequency Estimates. Previously, Technical Paper No. 40
(TP-40) Rainfall Frequency Atlas of the United States (NOAA) (published in 1961) was used to
determine rainfall frequency estimates. TP-40 was developed using available rainfall information
from far fewer stations than exist today; in Minnesota, there are 110 daily observation stations
used in TP-40 estimates, whereas there are 320 daily observation stations used in Atlas 14. In
addition to the fact that Atlas 14 estimates rely on a denser data network than TP-40, the
stations have a longer period of record, and regional frequency analyses and new spatial
interpolation techniques are used in the Atlas 14 method. Table 3.3 lists rainfall frequencies
from Atlas 14 estimates, for the Twin Cities area, applicable to the City of Centerville. The data
3.6
58
( Stantec
CITY OF CENTERVILLE -2018 LOCAL WATER PLAN
PHYSICAL ENVIRONMENT
taken from Atlas 14 are solely based on historical rainfall events and is not an extrapolation of
data trends to predict future events.
TABLE 3.3-24-HOUR RAINFALL DEPTHS AND FREQUENCY
2 2.8 2.8
5 3.5 3.5
10 4.2 4.2
50 5.3 6.2
100 5.9 7.2
3.5 LAKES AND OTHER SIGNIFICANT WATERBODIES
There are several waterbodies in the City. Peltier Lake and Centerville Lake are both located
partially within the City and mostly in Lino Lakes. Clearwater Creek (Anoka-Washington Judicial
Ditch 3) flows west and then north through the City to Peltier Lake. Anoka County Ditch 55
flows southwesterly through the City to Clearwater Creek. A private ditch flows northeasterly
through the City to Clearwater Creek.
Peltier Lake has a surface area of approximately 579 acres with a maximum depth of 18 feet.
Water quality data has been recorded for some parameters since 1974.
Centerville Lake is approximately 474 acres in surface area with a maximum depth of
approximately 19 feet. Water quality data on Centerville Lake has been recorded since 1980.
Centerville Lake has regional use for fishing and boating.
As shown in Table 3.4, there are two Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (MnDNR)
Protected Waters in the City. These include a portion of Centerville Lake, designated as
02000600, and a portion of Peltier Lake, designated as 02000400. Also included under MnDNR
authority are three protected wetlands as discussed in the next section.
TABLE 3.4- MNDNR PROTECTED WATERS WITHIN THE CITY OF CENTERVILLE
Centerville Lake 02000600 885.0
Peltier Lake 02000400 884.7
3.7
59
( Stantec
CITY OF CENTERVILLE -2018 LOCAL WATER PLAN
PHYSICAL ENVIRONMENT
3.6 WETLANDS
The Wetland Conservation Act (WCA) was passed in 1991 to maintain and protect wetland
areas throughout the State of Minnesota. The WCA creates a "not net loss policy" so that there
are mitigation measures for drained or filled wetlands. The Act also established that local
government units (LGUs) would have administrative responsibility for the implementation of the
WCA. The LGU responsible for administrative responsibility relating to the WCA for the City of
Centerville is RCWD. The contact at RCWD is Nick Tomczik, whose contact information is listed
below:
Rice Creek Watershed District
Nick Tomczik, Permit Coordinator/Wetland Specialist
4325 Pheasant Ridge Drive NE, Suite 611
Blaine, MN 55449
(763) 398-3079
Wetlands in the City are derived from the National Wetlands Inventory (USFWS, 2017) and are
shown in Figure 4. Wetlands are a significant portion of the natural features found in Centerville.
Table 3.5 lists the MnDNR Public Waters Wetlands located within the City. Figure 4 shows the
location and boundaries of the Public Waters Wetlands, which are obtained from the MnDNR
Geospatial Commons: https.//gisdata.mn.gov/.
TABLE 3.5- MNDNR PUBLIC WATERS WETLANDS WITHIN THE CITY OF CENTERVILLE
Wetland — Northeast corner of City 545W
Wetland —Across County Highway 14 from Centerville Lake 546W
Wetland —Southwest corner of City I 554W
It is essential to note that these boundaries are only approximate and do not replace a wetland
delineation. The MnDNR, the RCWD, and the US Army Corps of Engineers should be contacted
if work in or near wetlands is anticipated. Any construction activity that may impact wetlands
may require permits from the RCWD, the US Army Corps of Engineers, and/or MnDNR.
Correspondence regarding any wetland impacts should be directed to the following:
MN Dept. of Natural Resources US Army Corps of Engineers
Jason Speigel, Area Hydrologist Andy Beaudet, Anoka County Point of Contact
1200 Warner Road St. Paul District, 180 5th Street E., Suite 700
St. Paul, MN 55106 St. Paul, MN 55101-1678
(651) 259-5822 (651) 290-5642
3.8
60
( Stantec
CITY OF CENTERVILLE -2018 LOCAL WATER PLAN
PHYSICAL ENVIRONMENT
Rice Creek Watershed District
Nick Tomczik, Permit Coordinator/Wetland Specialist
4325 Pheasant Ridge Drive NE, Suite 611
Blaine, MN 55449
(763) 398-3079
3.7 LAND USE
Figure 5 illustrates land cover within the City, based on the MnDNR's Minnesota Land Cover
Classification System (MLCCS). The City is predominantly a residential community. Changes in
land use are anticipated in the future as construction of high and medium density or single
family residential development continues. The City's comprehensive plan lays out these
proposed areas for development or redevelopment. Of note, is the City's plan to redevelop the
downtown area with a mixed use (retail and high density housing) style project. This plan will
likely be revisited with the 2018 comprehensive plan update. Figure 6 shows existing land use
within the City. Figure 7 shows 2030 future land use within the City. These figures are taken
directly from Figures 8 and 15, respectively, of the Centerville 2040 Comprehensive Plan.
There are a few small areas that are expected to develop as residential in the future, particularly
in the southern portion of the City. Additionally, the City has constructed an industrial park in
the east central part of the city which will most likely build out in the near future.
3.8 UTILITY SYSTEMS
The public utilities within the City include the storm sewer, sanitary sewer, and water system.
The Metropolitan Council Environmental Service (MCES) public sanitary sewer system services
all of the developed portion of the City. There are a few scattered acreage style lots (11) and
two commercial/industrial sites which remain on Individual Sewage Treatment Systems (ISTS).
Proposed maintenance and inspection of these systems is addressed in Chapter 6. City code
requires connection to the municipal system with any redevelopment proposal.
The water distribution system now services most the developed part of the community. The
remaining neighborhoods are scheduled for connection to City water when their streets need
major repair. These neighborhoods include LaValle Drive and portions of the downtown area.
Scattered lots in neighborhoods served by City water remain unconnected. The city is working
on policies to encourage hook-up to the municipal water system with a goal of all city residents
being connected. There are approximately 1,265 water connections to the watermain system as
of December 2017, which includes residential as well as commercial, industrial, and institutional.
The remainder of the City is serviced by private wells, which totals approximately 147, down
from 255 in 2012, and 360 in 2004. These numbers were compiled from City utility billing
records. The water system for the City of Centerville includes one water tower, two wells, and a
controlled interconnection with the City of Lino Lakes' system. The surface water drainage
system includes street gutters, storm sewers, culverts, swales, channels, marshes, ponds,
3.9
61
( Stantec
CITY OF CENTERVILLE -2018 LOCAL WATER PLAN
PHYSICAL ENVIRONMENT
lakes, etc. Recent development in the City has incorporated the natural drainage patterns of the
land whenever possible. However, since the area is very flat, detention ponds were created in
many developments to control runoff.
3.9 UNIQUE AREAS
The Rice Creek Chain of Lakes Park Reserve is in the northwest corner of the City. Accounting
for approximately 10% of the area of the City, 149 of the 5,500 acres of the park are located
within Centerville city limits. The park has many recreational facilities including picnic areas,
boat and canoe launches, fishing piers, campgrounds, a nature center, a heritage lab, a prairie
restoration project, cross country ski trails, a swimming beach, a playground, and a golf course.
The Metropolitan Council's classification as a regional park requires that 80% of the park remain
in its natural state.
3.10 ZONING AND FLOODPLAIN MANAGEMENT
As part of the comprehensive planning process, the City adopted a Future Land Use Plan
(Figure 7). By law, the City is required to change zoning to match the 2040 Future Land Use
Plan within one year of the adoption of the Comprehensive Plan. This will take place after the
Plan has been reviewed and adopted in 2018.The City has adopted the 2030 Comprehensive
Plan and updated their zoning map (Figure 8) to match future land uses. This is not to say that
the Official Zoning Map reflects the existing land use. The Existing Land Use Map is shown in
Figure 6. Figures 6 and 7 are taken directly from the Centerville 2040 Comprehensive Plan;
Figure 8 is the adopted Official Zoning Map. There is no current plan to further alter zoning
within the City. The zoning ordinance now classifies land use into ten categories: Rural
Residential (R-1), High-Density Single-Family Residential (R-2A), Single-Family Residential (R-
2), Single-Family Manufactured Housing (R-4), Single Family Residential-Estate (R-5),
Commercial (B-1), Industrial Park (1-1), Public/Institutional (P-1), Mixed Use (M-1), Mixed Use
Neighborhood District (M-2). Higher density uses, such as business and industrial areas, tend
to have larger impervious surface coverage, impacting stormwater management. New planned
unit developments are subject to water protection regulations including the protection of existing
waterbodies and wetlands and dedicating at least 20% of project area to open space (City Code
156.200). The zoning ordinance also regulates shoreland activities; the governance of these
zones is described in more detail in the following section (3.11 Shoreland and Buffer Zones).
Figure 9 delineates the approximate floodplain and floodway boundaries within the City. The
City initiated the Floodplain Reduction Project along Clearwater Creek in 1989. This project
involved the investment of significant resources to reduce flooding potential along Clearwater
Creek. Following completion of the project, a Clearwater Creek flood study was conducted and
a Letter of Map Revision (LOMR) was subsequently approved by the Federal Emergency
Management Agency (FEMA) in October 1997. As a result, the Flood Insurance Study (FIS),
Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM), and the Flood Boundary and Floodway Map (FBFM) for the
City were revised. These references should be consulted for more complete and detailed
3.10
62
( Stantec
CITY OF CENTERVILLE -2018 LOCAL WATER PLAN
PHYSICAL ENVIRONMENT
information on the floodplain and floodway areas. The current FEMA map is dated December
16, 2015.
The Federal Emergency Management Administration has recently acquired more accurate,
digitized mapping data and has sent copies of a revised FIRM to cities for review. Centerville
submitted several comments regarding areas which have been excluded from the floodplain via
LOMA-Fs and other methods. However, the resubmitted map did not show these areas out of
the floodplain. This map approval process is still in progress at the time of this report.
3.11 SHORELAND AND BUFFER ZONES
Minnesota's Buffer Law establishes a requirement for lands adjacent to lakes, rivers, streams,
and ditches, to have a buffer consisting of perennial vegetation. This buffer must be at least
16.5 feet wide for ditches, and 50 feet for lakes, rivers, and streams. The purpose of the
Minnesota Buffer Law is to filter out phosphorus, nitrogen, and sediment. Buffers for public
waters (lakes, rivers, and streams) had to have been implemented by November 1, 2017, while
buffers for ditches need to be implemented by November 1, 2018. Local Soil Water
Conservation Districts (SWCDs) are responsible for working with landowners to ensure that the
Buffer Law is met. The SWCD for Centerville is Anoka Conservation District (ACD). The contact
at ACD for Buffer Law implementation is Jared Wagner, whose contact information is listed
below:
Jared Wagner, Water Resource Technician
Anoka Conservation District
1318 McKay Dr NE, Suite 300
Ham Lake, MN 55304
(763) 434-2030 x18
The City of Centerville's City Code (Chapter 156.133, Part B) discusses shoreland ordinances
and special provisions relating to development within shoreland areas. The Ordinance contains
provisions regulating lot size, setbacks, grading, and vegetative alterations. Centerville's Code
specifies that buildings must be set back at least 75 feet from the ordinary high water level for
lands that adjoin a lake. Furthermore, there is a setback requirement for Clearwater Creek of at
least 100 feet from the ordinary high water level. Because the City of Centerville has a
shoreland ordinance that is more stringent than the State's Buffer Law, parcels that are
identified on the DNR Buffer Map Viewing Application as lands that need buffers are already
compliant. These rules were verified with ACD, who will identify individual landowners if their
parcels are non-compliant with the Buffer Law.
3.12 GROUNDWATER CHARACTERISTICS
Information on the City's geologic and groundwater characteristics, including geologic features,
groundwater sensitivity, groundwater discharge and recharge areas, and the influence of land
3.11
63
( Stantec
CITY OF CENTERVILLE -2018 LOCAL WATER PLAN
PHYSICAL ENVIRONMENT
use on groundwater can be found in the City's Wellhead Protection Plan, adopted in December
2007. A copy of this plan can be obtained at City Hall. The plan contains information which the
City views as security-sensitive; consequently, the full Wellhead Protection Plan is not available
online, but the action steps that the City of Centerville is taking to protect its groundwater supply
are discussed below.
These action steps include:
• Implementing a public education program: Centerville will implement both a
Wellhead Protection Awareness Project, which will help residents and business owners
be involved in wellhead protection efforts, as well as a Hazardous Materials
Management Education Project, where residents and business owners will learn how to
use, store and dispose of hazardous materials within the DWSMAs through
environmental education programs.
• Managing wells: The City will seal abandoned wells within DWSMAs, and work with
MDH to monitor/maintain construction records of wells within the City.
• Monitoring contaminant sources: The City will track potential contaminants within the
DWSMA.
• Utilizing existing land use and development programs: The City will work with
planning and zoning authorities to change controls so that drinking wells are protected.
The City will also consult the Wellhead Protection Plan when it updates the Local Water
Plan (this document) and the Comprehensive Plan.
• Ensuring adequate water quantity and quality: As part of the Wellhead Protection
Plan, Centerville will monitor aquifer chemistry and minimize groundwater use by
imposing water conservation measures.
As discussed in the Wellhead Protection Report, the City will evaluate progress of the Plan by
preparing an internal progress report for the above action items. Progress reports will be
prepared every 2.5 years at a minimum. This report will include updates to the Potential
Contaminant Source Inventory, summarize water quality data and water demands, and among
other updates, will present information on future actions to meet Wellhead Protection Plan goals
and objectives.
3.12
64
( Stantec
CITY OF CENTERVILLE -2018 LOCAL WATER PLAN
HYDROLOGIC CALCULATIONS/MODELING PARAMETERS
4.0 HYDROLOGIC CALCULATIONS/MODELING PARAMETERS
4.1 WATER QUANTITY
As stated in Chapter 6, rate control must be provided within each development that maintains
existing runoff conditions for the 2-year, 10-year, and 100-year storm events. For each
proposed development, supporting calculations or modeling must be submitted. The
calculations or modeling shall be based on NRCS methods. The parameters for the calculations
or modeling shall be as follows:
NRCS 24-HOUR Type II design storms based on NOAA Atlas 14 Precipitation Estimates for
Centerville, MN:
1-year storm = 2.4"
10-year storm = 4.2"
100-year storm =7.2"
Previously, Technical Paper 40 estimates were:
1-year storm = 2.4"
10-year storm = 4.2"
100-year storm = 5.9"
As discussed in Section 3.4 (Climate), the state of Minnesota and watershed districts now
require use of Atlas 14-Point Precipitation Frequency estimates. Previously, Technical Paper
No. 40 (TP-40) estimates were used. NOAA Atlas 14 data uses more precipitation stations in its
statistical analysis, includes additional precipitation records, and uses a more robust statistical
analysis to determine rainfall estimates. Both TP-40 and Atlas 14 datasets are based on
historical rainfall events and do not extrapolate to predict future events.
In addition to analyzing the 2-year, 10-year and 100-year storm events, the 10-day snowmelt
(Curve Number 100) must be used. According to RCWD requirements, analyzing the 10-day
snowmelt event is not required for stormwater management detention basins with a defined
outlet elevation at or below the 100-year return period, 24-hour rainfall event elevation.
To analyze stormwater runoff for the design of discharge and water levels within and from the
project site, a hydrograph method, or program based on NRCS Technical Release #20, must be
used. Pervious and impervious areas in the model must be modeled separately.
4.13
65
( Stantec
CITY OF CENTERVILLE -2018 LOCAL WATER PLAN
HYDROLOGIC CALCULATIONS/MODELING PARAMETERS
To determine post-development Curve Numbers, new RCWD requirements are that the
Hydrologic Soil Group (HSG) of areas within construction limits must be shifted down one
classification for Curve Number 74 and half of one classification for Curve Number 49. This
helps to account for grading impacts on soil structure.
4.2 NURP STANDARDS
The design storm for determining compliance with Nationwide Urban Runoff Program (NURP)
standards for stormwater ponds shall be 2.5 inches. See Chapter 6 for additional details.
4.14
66
( Stantec
CITY OF CENTERVILLE -2018 LOCAL WATER PLAN
WATER RESOURCE MANAGEMENT OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES
5.0 WATER RESOURCE MANAGEMENT OBJECTIVES AND
POLICIES
5.1 BACKGROUND
The City of Centerville has adopted several water resource management objectives, which
provide a framework to guide development of policies and management programs.
According to Minnesota Rules Chapter 8410, the development of objectives and policies must,
at a minimum, address the following issues: Water Quantity, Water Quality, Recreation, Fish
and Wildlife, Enhancement of Public Participation through Information and Education, Public
Ditch Systems, Groundwater, Wetlands, and Erosion. The goals must be outlined in sufficient
detail to provide direction regarding policy deliverables, provide direction to the organization's
board, and be quantifiable so that success can be appropriately measured. The goals should
recognize the relationship between water quality and land use.
The mission statement of the RCWD is to "prevent flooding and enhance water quality in
harmony with development for the common good." Thus, the RCWD and its board of managers
established an operational framework to guide its management of cities, counties and townships
located within the District. These are:
• Demonstrate measurable success by solving problems and implementing solutions;
• Explore a range of ideas and opportunities and projects to ensure healthy water resources
for the Rice Creek Watershed;
• Balance the complex inter-related dynamics of resource management;
• Enlist the public and cities as partners in resource management;
• Operate in a fiscally efficient manner based on providing "best value" and accountability;
• Implement and construct innovative projects to solve problems and,
• Make decisions in the best interest of the entire area comprising the Rice Creek Watershed.
5.2 OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES
The City has adopted the following objectives and associated policies to be adopted as part of
the LWP:
5.15
67
( Stantec
CITY OF CENTERVILLE -2018 LOCAL WATER PLAN
WATER RESOURCE MANAGEMENT OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES
Objective 1
Reduce to the greatest extent possible erosion and sediment deposition from new
construction sites into natural water resources within the City.
The City experienced significant development in the early to mid-2000s. While development has
slowed considerably the past several years due to the economic downturn, it is likely to pick up
again in the future. While it may not reach the level of the "boom years", development could
continue in the City for several years into the future.
To meet this objective, the City will implement a local program of erosion and sediment control
that would be administered in addition to the RCWD permit and inspection program. The City
realizes that RCWD efforts in this area are limited by manpower and budget constraints, and
understands that erosion and sediment control can be better enforced at a more local level.
The City understands its responsibilities as an MS4 city. However, there are likely places where
the RCWD and the City could work together to eliminate redundancies. Centerville will work with
the RCWD to do so.
Related Policies
(a) Continue enforcing the City code addressing erosion control for all new development
occurring in the City (see appendix).
Objective 2
Minimize potential damage from flooding of personal and public property.
Flooding damages have long been a concern in the City due to the numerous wetland areas
and the Clearwater Creek Ditch System. Moreover, flooding problems have resulted from the
difficulty associated with maintaining proper drainage over the flat topography of the area.
The City has been proactive in reducing flooding potential to residents. For example, in 1989,
the City initiated the Floodplain Reduction Project along Clearwater Creek. This project involved
the investment of significant resources to reduce flooding potential along Clearwater Creek. It
was completed in 1994, with final approval from FEMA of the revised flood profile occurring in
1996.
In 2015, the City worked with FEMA to updated the FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM).
This map relies on updated LI DAR data to establish a more realistic and accurate floodplain.
The FEMA FIRM map is attached (Figure 9).
5.16
68
( Stantec
CITY OF CENTERVILLE -2018 LOCAL WATER PLAN
WATER RESOURCE MANAGEMENT OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES
Related Policies
(a) Continue enforcing the City code addressing floodplain management for all new
development occurring in the City (see appendix).
(b) Continue policy of reviewing new grading plans for potential flooding problems.
(c) Implement the capital improvement projects described in Chapter 8. It is anticipated that
these projects will help reduce flooding potential at several problem areas within the
City.
(d) Cooperate with the RCWD in administering infiltration standards. The City defers to the
goals and policies of the RCWD regarding infiltration. New infiltration standards are further
described in Chapter 6, Water Resource Management Plan.
Objective 3
Protect and improve the water quality of the Clearwater Creek Ditch System, Peltier Lake,
and Centerville Lake.
All new developments within the City are now required to provide some type of pretreatment of
stormwater such as ponding or infiltration basins. This policy has been in place since the mid-
1990s. Consequently, the City now maintains over 100 such features. Through recent street
reconstruction projects, the City and county have addressed the few remaining areas where
stormwater was discharged directly into Clearwater Creek with no treatment. These locations
included two low points along Peltier Lake Drive, a low point on Brian Drive south of Main
Street, and the low point at the Main Street culvert crossing. These locations now have some
means of pretreatment.
Direct discharge of stormwater to Centerville Lake is still present from the downtown area.
However, the city has constructed the first phase of a stormwater reclamation project, aimed at
eliminating this discharge as the downtown redevelops. This project was completed with
cooperation from the RCWD.
Related Policies
(a) Work toward the implementation of policies, programs, and projects to achieve the
requirements of the Peltier Lake and Centerville Lake TMDL Implementation Plan, when
it is finalized and approved.
(b) Support the RCWD Water Quality BMP Cost-Share Program. This is a dedicated cost-
share grant program to assist property owners with the implementation of Best
Management Practices (BMPs) aimed at improving the quality of surface waters within
the watershed.
5.17
69
( Stantec
CITY OF CENTERVILLE -2018 LOCAL WATER PLAN
WATER RESOURCE MANAGEMENT OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES
(c) Initiate more frequent sweeping at direct discharge points along Peltier Lake Drive and
Brian Drive, and coordinate with Anoka County for more frequent sweeping along Main
Street.
(d) Cooperate with the RCWD in administering infiltration standards. The City defers to the
goals and policies of the RCWD regarding infiltration.
(e) Identify retrofit opportunities in sub-watersheds where water quality treatment standards
are not being met.
Objective 4
Maintain the integrity of the stormwater collection system.
Related Policies
(a) Develop a systematic approach to maintenance of stormwater ponds and ditches.
(b) Adjust the stormwater utility fee as appropriate to best utilize funds for the maintenance
and capital improvements program.
(c) Work with Minnesota Cities Stormwater Coalition to determine dredging costs,
schedules, and disposal of sediment, especially contaminated sediment.
Objective 5
Protect recreation, fish, and wildlife resources.
The City is located in a very unique area surrounded by lakes, creeks, beaches, and parks.
Realizing the value of these resources, the City desires to be a part of the preservation of these
valuable resources.
Related Policies
(a) Continue enforcing the City code addressing shoreland activities (see appendix).
(b) Support efforts of the MnDNR, the RCWD, and the Lake Homeowners Association in
managing Centerville and Peltier Lakes.
Objective 6
Increase public participation through information and education.
The City currently distributes information to all residents through the City's website. This website
provides an excellent forum for distributing information on water resource-related issues and
5.18
70
( Stantec
CITY OF CENTERVILLE -2018 LOCAL WATER PLAN
WATER RESOURCE MANAGEMENT OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES
developments to the public. Through this website, the City increases public awareness about
water resource management through including regular features on its website.
Additionally, the City's website provides links to information on websites of other agencies
including the RCWD and BWSR.
Related Policies
(a) The City currently has signs at some of the entrances to public parks and well-travelled
parkways. The City will continue to have signs at these entrances and will work to add signs to
those parks that do not have signs, which highlight the importance of disposing of pet waste. will
continue to have signs at the entrances to public parks and well-travelled walkways, highlighting
the importance of disposing of pet waste.
5.19
71
( Stantec
CITY OF CENTERVILLE -2018 LOCAL WATER PLAN
WATER RESOURCE MANAGEMENT PLAN
6.0 WATER RESOURCE MANAGEMENT PLAN
This chapter of the plan provides specific information as to the proposed management
framework and methods to meet the water resource management objectives and policies
outlined in Chapter 5. The storm sewer and drainage basin map for the City is presented in
Figure 8.
6.1 STORMWATER MANAGEMENT AND MAINTENANCE
The City experienced significant development in the early to mid-2000s. While development has
slowed considerably the past several years due to the economic downturn, it is likely to pick up
again in the future. It is anticipated that development could continue in the City for a number of
years into the future until near ultimate population and growth is achieved.
Stormwater improvements are a requirement of City Code Chapter 157 for new developments.
Most new storm sewer constructed in the City will be funded by developers, either directly or
through a bonding and assessment process.
In accordance with the RCWD Watershed Management Plan, and in an effort to protect
downstream waters, the City requires that all new developments provide for treatment of
stormwater discharge. If a project cumulatively creates or reconstructs 10,000 square feet or
more of impervious surface, the developer must apply for a permit from the City and RCWD for
the project.
The current water quality treatment standard for all projects except public linear projects is
determined as follows:
Required Water Quality Treatment Volume (ft3)
= Area of New or Reconstructed Impervious Surface (f t2) x 1.1(in)
in
TP Removal Factor from Table 1 -- t
12 (f )
Required Water Quality Treatment Volume (ft3)
in
= Area of New or Reconstructed Impervious Surface (ft2) x 0.75(in) - 12(i
ft
6.20
72
(' Stantuc
CITY OFCENTERV|LLE -2D1QLOCAL WATER PLAN
WATER RESOURCE MANAGEMENT PLAN
TABLE Q.1 -TPREMOVAL FACTORS FOR PROPERLY DESIGNED ByNPa
Infiltration Infiltration Feature 1.00
Water Reuse Irrigation 1.00
Biofiltration Underdrain 0.65
Filtration Sand or Rock Filter 0.50
Stormwater Shallow Wetland 0.40
Wetlands Pond/Wetland 0.55
Stormwater Wet Pond 0.50
Ponds Multiple Ponds 0.60
Infiltration may be infeasible, due to potential contamination (i.e. contaminated soils or potential
otormvvaterhob;poto\. physical limitations /i.e. low permeability soils, bedrock close tothe
infiltration area, seasonal high water tables, or karst areas), or land use limitations /i.e. nearby
vve||o or utility locations). In these oaoeo. alternative BMPo are required, as listed inTable 0.1
These BMPo are stated in order of RCVVD'o preferenoe, due toTP removal efficiencies.
The RCWD requires protective easements for all stormwater detention facilities and conveyance
structures. These easements are intended to protect floodplain and otormvvaterotonage areas
from alterations that may interfere with storage and/or flow ofsurface water, particularly during
flood conditions. They also serve as formal notice to the property owners and future property
owners that the land within the easements may be inundated atany future date.
Maintenance of stormwater facilities will be coordinated with the RCWD. Currently, inspections
are performed in the spring and fall, with maintenance done as needed. Maintenance of the
current system will continue to be a priority for the City. As new development occurs, developers
will "turn over" these new otornnvvatertsoi|ideo to the City Public Works Departnnent, including
trunk and lateral storm sewers, catch basins, stormwater BMPs, and ponds and outlet
structures. With such a relatively new storm sewer system, there are currently few maintenance
tasks other than street sweeping, which is done a minimum of twice per year. However, the City
plans to formulate a Maintenance Plan Budget within five years.
As an MS4 oih/. Centerville is ultimately responsible for the monitoring and maintenance of
water bodies and other best management practices or structural stormwater conveyance
oyotenno as defined in its NPDEE) permit. It shall be oih/ policy that the City is directly
responsibility for the monitoring and maintenance of elements of the City's MS4 system when
those elements take drainage from public property or the public right-of-way. Where elements of
the oib/'o MS4oyotem are constructed on, and take drainage from, solely private propertv, oih/
policy shall bethat the private property owner is responsible for monitoring and maintenance of
0.21
( Stantec
CITY OF CENTERVILLE -2018 LOCAL WATER PLAN
WATER RESOURCE MANAGEMENT PLAN
these items. If the property owner fails to complete such monitoring and maintenance, the City
may complete this work and assess the associated costs to the property.
The city shall not monitor or maintain water bodies which are not part of the city's MS4 system.
Potential capital improvement projects are described in Chapter 8, Capital Improvements Plan.
These projects should aid in addressing maintenance concerns within their respective areas.
As described in Section 3.8, Utility Systems, eleven residences and two commercial/industrial
sites remain on Individual Sewage Treatment Systems (ISTS). The City will work closely with
the County to inspect these systems and assure that they are operated properly.
6.2 SUPPORT OF RCWD PROGRAMS AND EXISTING AGREEMENTS
The City recognizes the benefit of a governmental entity such as the RCWD for purposes of
water resource management. An agency such as the RCWD can best handle sensitive
intercommunity issues such as water and drainage rights and management. As a result, the City
will continue to support and coordinate with the RCWD on all water resource management
issues, and it recognizes the role of the RCWD to continue to administer all water resource
permitting and regulation responsibilities within the City.
The City presently has existing agreements with the City of Lino Lakes and the RCWD. The
RCWD is responsible for maintenance of the Clearwater Creek Ditch System within the City.
The City also cooperates with the City of Lino Lakes under a Joint Powers Agreement with
street sweeping and rock hauling efforts. There are no other known existing agreements with
the City of Lino Lakes, RCWD, or private parties.
6.3 PHASE II NPDES MS4 PERMIT AND SWPPP
The MPCA is the permitting authority in Minnesota for the National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System (NPDES). Under this system, the City is considered a municipal separate
storm sewer system (MS4) community and must obtain a Phase II NPDES MS4 Permit. Under
the provisions of its MS4 Permit, the City has developed and implemented a Stormwater
Pollution Prevention Program (SWPPP).
The SWPPP addresses six minimum control measures:
1. Public education
2. Public involvement
3. Illicit discharge detection and elimination
4. Construction site runoff control
5. Post-construction runoff control
6. Pollution prevention in municipal operations
6.22
74
( Stantec
CITY OF CENTERVILLE -2018 LOCAL WATER PLAN
WATER RESOURCE MANAGEMENT PLAN
The City has identified best management practices (BMPs) and measurable goals associated
with each minimum control measure. An annual report on the implementation of the SWPPP is
prepared and submitted to the MPCA each year. Details of the City's SWPPP are available on
its website.
6.4 TOTAL MAXIMUM DAILY LOAD (TMDL) STUDIES
TMDL studies have been completed and approved by the United States Environmental
Protection Agency (U.S. EPA) for both Peltier and Centerville Lakes, and for the Lino Lakes
Chain of Lakes. The Lino Lakes Chain of Lakes TMDL Report was approved on November 25,
2013, and the Lino Lakes Chain of Lakes TMDL Report was approved on September 27, 2013.
Peltier Lake and Centerville Lake have been listed by the MPCA as impaired for nutrients, with
phosphorus identified as the main pollutant causing the impairment. The TMDL report calls for
a 46% reduction in total phosphorus loading for Peltier Lake and a zero percent reduction for
Centerville. The assumption is that phosphorus reductions to Peltier Lake will benefit
Centerville Lake as well. There is no specific reduction identified for the City; instead, the TMDL
report calls for a "categorical reduction" of 46% that would need to be met by the contributing
watershed. Specific implementation strategies affecting Centerville include implementing
RCWD rules and meeting the requirements of the 2007 Environmental Assessment Worksheet
prepared for the City's Downtown Development.
The Lino Lakes Chain of Lakes are impaired for nutrients, again with phosphorus identified as
the main pollutant. The TMDL report calls for no load reduction from MS4 communities within
the watershed. Instead, internal loading and outflow from Peltier Lake are identified as the
primary phosphorus sources. Meeting the load reduction requirement in the Peltier Lake TMDL
is considered essential to meeting the Lino Lakes Chain of Lakes water quality goals.
6.5 STORMWATER RUNOFF RATE CONTROL
To prevent flooding associated with increased runoff rates from new developments, rate control
must be provided within each development that maintains existing runoff conditions (or less) for
the 2-year, 10-year, and 100-year storm events. Rates must be determined using Atlas-14
precipitation frequency estimates.
6.6 MANAGEMENT OF CLEARWATER CREEK DITCH SYSTEM
Most runoff in the City of Centerville is routed either directly or indirectly to Clearwater Creek.
Clearwater Creek is a natural waterway connected to the Anoka-Washington Judicial Ditch 3
(AWJD 3) system. The Clearwater Creek Ditch System can be considered a "trunk storm sewer"
for the entire City. RCWD, as the public drainage authority, is responsible for maintenance of
the AWJD 3 system. The system will be managed in accordance with the rate control and water
quality policies outlined in Sections 6.1 and 6.5.
6.23
75
( Stantec
CITY OF CENTERVILLE -2018 LOCAL WATER PLAN
WATER RESOURCE MANAGEMENT PLAN
6.7 INTERCOMMUNITY FLOWS
The City is bounded on all sides by the City of Lino Lakes. Any flows leaving Centerville
therefore enter Lino Lakes. Most the City drains to Peltier Lake, either directly or via Clearwater
Creek. A portion of the City drains to Centerville Lake, which then drains to Peltier Lake. A
small area in the northwestern portion of the City drains directly to Lino Lakes. The Rice Creek
Watershed District identifies the intercommunity flows from Centerville to Lino Lakes, via
Clearwater Creek (Anoka-Washington Judicial Ditch 3) as:
• 2-year, 24-hour rainfall peak flow: 196 cfs
• 10-year, 24-hour rainfall peak flow: 339 cfs
• 100-year, 24-hour rainfall peak flow: 573 cfs
• 100-year, 10-day snowmelt peak flow: 433 cfs
Because of the large storage volume available in the two lakes, peak flows entering from the
City will be greatly attenuated prior to discharge from Peltier Lake. As stated earlier in this
chapter, the City requires that peak flow rates from the 2-, 10-, and 100-year storm events be
maintained at or below existing conditions. The RCWD rules require the infiltration and/or
retention of the runoff volume as described in Section 6.1. The combination of these factors
leads to a net reduction below existing conditions for discharge leaving the City and entering
Lino Lakes.
6.8 EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL
Recognizing that erosion and sediment control can best be administered on a local level, the
Centerville City Council discussed methods and policies that can be implemented to control
erosion from new construction sites. In the past, this responsibility was delegated almost fully to
the Rice Creek Watershed District. However, due to the number of construction projects the
RCWD administers during a given construction season, it is difficult for the watershed district to
inspect these projects.
The erosion and sediment control criteria for new developments that resulted from these
discussions with the City have been consolidated into an Erosion and Sediment Control Policy
for New Developments. The policy adopts the procedures and recommendations of the
Minnesota Pollution Control Agency's Protecting Water Quality in Urban Areas: Best
Management Practices for Minnesota. City Code Chapter 157 addressing Erosion Control is
provided in the appendix.
To prevent soil erosion into surface water systems, RCWD requires a District permit where soil
disturbance or removal of vegetative cover affects one acre or more of land, or where soil
disturbance/removal exceeds 10,000 square feet or more of land if the disturbed area is greater
than 300 feet or more. Erosion and sediment control plans must: 1) address erosion and
sediment issues during and after project completion, 2) be consistent with the MPCA's
document "Protecting Water Quality in Urban Areas," 3) minimize the removal of vegetation, and
6.24
76
( Stantec
CITY OF CENTERVILLE -2018 LOCAL WATER PLAN
WATER RESOURCE MANAGEMENT PLAN
4) must protect facilities used for post-construction stormwater infiltration. The RCWD has
encouraged the City to participate in the District's Water Quality BMP Cost-Share Program. This
is a dedicated cost-share grant program to assist property owners with the implementation of
Best Management Practices (BMPs) aimed at improving the quality of surface waters within the
District. Installing a rain garden, stabilizing erosion problems along shorelines, restoring
degraded wetlands, installation of agricultural BMPs, and installing pervious pavers are some of
the practices that may be eligible for this program. For selected projects, the RCWD may
provide funding up to 50% of total project costs up to a maximum of$5,000. If a project is
deemed to be highly beneficial to local water resources, then the RCWD can fund up to 75% of
eligible materials and contracted labor up to $7,500.
It is important to note that this policy is not intended to eliminate or reduce RCWD inspection
efforts within the City. Rather, this policy would be a local means of enforcing erosion control
issues with the same primary goals as the RCWD — protection of natural water resource
systems.
6.9 WETLAND MANAGEMENT
In accordance with the Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act (WCA), the RCWD currently
serves as the Local Government Unit (LGU) for WCA administration within the City. The City
anticipates that the RCWD will continue in this role in the future. Chapter 5 of the RCWD 2010
Watershed Management Plan delineates the details of the watershed district's wetland policies.
These policies govern all wetland management issues within the City.
As with floodplains and stormwater facilities, all wetlands within the property limits of new
developments must be covered by protective easements. Any construction activity that may
impact wetlands may require permits from the RCWD, the US Army Corps of Engineers, and/or
MnDNR. Correspondence regarding any wetland impacts should be directed to the following:
MN Dept. of Natural Resources US Army Corps of Engineers
Jason Speigel, Area Hydrologist Andy Beaudet, Anoka County Point of Contact
1200 Warner Road St. Paul District, 180 5th Street E., Suite 700
St. Paul, MN 55106 St. Paul, MN 55101-1678
(651) 259-5822 (651) 290-5642
Rice Creek Watershed District
Nick Tomczik, Permit Coordinator/Wetland Specialist
4325 Pheasant Ridge Drive NE, Suite 611
Blaine, MN 55449
(763) 398-3079
6.25
77
( Stantec
CITY OF CENTERVILLE -2018 LOCAL WATER PLAN
WATER RESOURCE MANAGEMENT PLAN
6.10 FLOODPLAIN ADMINISTRATION
Flood damage prevention requirements are contained in City Code Chapter 155 (see appendix).
The goal of the requirements is to promote the public health, safety, and general welfare and to
minimize the potential impacts of flooding such as loss of life, loss of property, disruption of
commerce and governmental services, and extraordinary public expenditures for flood
protection and relief. Figure 7 illustrates the approximate floodplain boundaries within the City.
6.11 SHORELAND REGULATION
Shoreland regulation is discussed in Section 3.11 (Shoreland and Buffer Zones).
6.12 PUBLIC PARTICIPATION
The City implements a public information and education program through the City website.
Future website pages will contain information about different topics concerning water resources
within the City, as well as summaries of continuing water resource management programs.
Some possible future topics for the website are listed below:
• Educational articles on stormwater management treatment.
• Educational articles on environmental policies.
• Storm sewer maintenance schedules.
• RCWD policy changes.
• City policy changes.
• Household impacts on water quality.
6.26
78
( Stantec
CITY OF CENTERVILLE -2018 LOCAL WATER PLAN
IMPLEMENTATION PROGRAM
7.0 IMPLEMENTATION PROGRAM
This chapter of the LWP provides information as to the practical method for implementing the
programs discussed in Chapter 6. Implementation and management of programs require both
personnel and financial resources. This chapter provides information about which entities will be
responsible for which programs as well as a method for raising funds to implement programs.
7.1 ADMINISTRATION RESPONSIBILITY AND IMPROVEMENT PLAN
As stated in Section 6.2, the RCWD will continue to require permits for construction projects and
all water resource management issues within the City of Centerville. The City's programs and
policies will be administered in conjunction with RCWD programs; none of the programs and
policies proposed in this LWP are meant to conflict with any of the RCWD programs or policies.
Furthermore, Centerville endeavors to reduce redundancies with inspection, enforcement, and
regulation.
7.2 FINANCING OF MANAGEMENT PROGRAMS
The funding for implementation of several of the proposed programs and projects identified in
the LWP could come from several sources. Possible sources of revenue include:
Stormwater Utility Fee: Stormwater Utility fees are levied on all property in the City. The fee is
collected each quarter with the sanitary sewer bill. The City's current fees are presented in
Chapter 9.
Building Permits: A cash dedication to the Stormwater Utility Fund is part of the building permit
requirement.
Stormwater Area Charge: New developments occurring in Centerville are charged a fee based
on the total platted area. All revenue generated from this program is deposited into the
Stormwater Utility Fund. The City's current fees are presented in Chapter 9.
Special Assessments: The City may assess for improvement projects based on the benefit
provided to the affected properties. The assessment may not be greater than the benefit
provided to the property.
Grants: Grant programs exist for water management projects and will be explored as possible
funding sources.
7.27
79
( Stantec
CITY OF CENTERVILLE -2018 LOCAL WATER PLAN
IMPLEMENTATION PROGRAM
7.3 PUBLIC PARTICIPATION THROUGH INFORMATION AND EDUCATION
The City staff prepares a City website (http://www.centervillemn.com). This website is used as a
forum for providing information and education to the residents of Centerville. Information for the
website is obtained from lake association groups, various governmental agencies, and the City
Engineer.
7.4 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN SUMMARY
Projects are identified and described in Chapter 8 as potential capital improvement projects.
7.28
80
( Stantec
CITY OF CENTERVILLE -2018 LOCAL WATER PLAN
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN
8.0 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN
8.1 INTRODUCTION
As defined in the Centerville Capital Improvements Plan, capital improvements are those
projects having a life expectancy that exceeds the financing period of the item or having a total
purchase price equal to or greater than $5,000. Included in the total capital improvement cost
are engineering, construction, land acquisition, administration, and legal and bonding fees.
8.2 COMPLETED CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
In the last update of the City's LWP, released in September 2012, the City has performed
capital improvement plans identified in that plan. The location of these projects is shown in
Figure 11, and they are described below.
1. Downtown Stormwater Reclamation Project: A 42" trunk line sewer from the
downtown area to the stormwater reclamation system was constructed. This project was
completed prior to eventual redevelopment of the downtown area, which eliminates the
direct discharges which exist from the downtown. The pipe is oversized for current flows.
The total cost of this project was $450,000.
2. Center Oaks 2 and Royal Meadows Infiltration Features: Streets were reconstructed
in two neighborhoods with the installation of water mains. Infiltration features were
included. The total cost of this project was $200,000.
3. Back Yard Drainage Improvements: Improvements to backyard drainage throughout
the City were made.
Prior to 2012, there were capital improvement projects that were completed between 2004
(when the previous local water plan was published) and 2012 (when the most recent update
was made). Improvements that were made in Centerville include:
1. Center Oaks Drainage Improvements: Stormwater diverted to alleviate cul-de-sac
flooding.
2. Shad Avenue Drainage Improvements: Back yard drain tile installed, ditches
regraded.
3. Peltier Lake Drive Water Quality Improvements: Direct flows into Clearwater Creek
were intercepted in rain gardens.
8.29
81
( Stantec
CITY OF CENTERVILLE -2018 LOCAL WATER PLAN
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN
4. Heritage Street Water Quality Improvements: Infiltration trench was constructed to
treat stormwater heading directly to Centerville Lake.
5. Rain Gardens on Peltier Lake Drive: Rain gardens were installed along Peltier Lake
Drive as part of a street reconstruction project.
6. Rain Gardens on 73`d Street: Rain gardens were installed along 73 d Street as part of a
street reconstruction project.
7. Rain Garden in Hidden Spring Park: Rain garden was installed as part of an
agreement to treat stormwater from a 2004 Street Reconstruction Project.
8. Quebec Area Drainage Improvements: Backyard drain tile was installed in the Quebec
Area of the City.
9. Pheasant Marsh Drainage Improvements: Ditch grading along the west side of
Pheasant Marsh 2nd Addition. Improvements were made to improve drainage from catch
basins on Mallard Way.
10. Phase I and II — Downtown Stormwater Reclamation Project: A constructed
stormwater-fed irrigation system was constructed in LaMotte Park. A large, 42" diameter
pipe was added to the downtown area, eliminating direct discharge to Centerville Lake.
All downtown stormwater is now routed to the stormwater irrigation system in LaMotte
Park.
8.3 FUTURE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
1. Back Yard Drainage Improvements: Improvements to backyard drainage throughout
the City will need to continue to be made. The following list includes areas within
Centerville that have experienced drainage issues due to long, flat yards. These yards
are listed by the highest priority yards, and the amount of drain tile needed to improve
drainage:
A. Center Street north lot lines, east of Ivy Court (460 ft)
B. Brian Drive/Way (550 ft)
C. Meadow Court/Lane (380 ft)
D. Center Street south lot lines, east of Tourville Circle (500 ft)
E. Brian Drive/Cottonwood Court (570 ft)
F. Eagle Trail/Brian Drive, north of trail (240 ft)
G. North of Unity Avenue cul-de-sac (200 ft)
H. Revoir Street, north property line (500 ft)
I. McBride Park NE corner (170 ft)
J. Mound Trail ditch 1200/1300 area (275 ft)
K. North Center Street property line, west of Dupre Road (350 ft)
8.30
82
( Stantec
CITY OF CENTERVILLE -2018 LOCAL WATER PLAN
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN
These locations are identified in Figure 11, the Capital Improvement Plan Map. The total
footage of drain tile that would have to be added to complete the improvements listed
above is 4200 ft. The City has completed previous drain tile projects consisting of
trenching an 18" wide and 18" deep trough by installing river rock with tile surrounded by
fabric and covered with 4" thick of pea rock on top. In 2009, this cost$50/ft. Costs to
complete these improvements today would depend upon the location, length of run,
elevation, and tree roots/other obstacles. Accounting for inflation and assuming a cost of
$50/ft would mean these improvements would cost roughly $230,000. On October 9th'
2013, the City passed Resolution #13-022 which authorizes the City to participate in
resolving public drainage problems. The City participates in the cost of drainage facilities
by sharing in 25% of the cost of the project to be paid from the Stormwater Fund,
provided the property owners agree to voluntarily be assessed for the remaining 75% of
the cost. Thus, the City would pay $57,500 towards these listed backyard drainage
issues.
2. LaMotte Stormwater Reuse System Expansion: The current stormwater reuse system
will be expanded to include additional area in LaMotte Park, as well as Hidden Spring
Park. Three additional spray heads ($75,000 total) will need to be added to LaMotte
Park. A full irrigation system, similar to that which was installed in LaMotte Park, will
need to be added to Hidden Spring Park ($120,000).
3. LaMotte Stormwater Reuse System Upgrades: Given the recent regulatory scrutiny of
stormwater irrigation in the State of Minnesota, the City may be forced to add advanced
filtration and/or a UV disinfection system to the stormwater irrigation system in LaMotte
Park. UV disinfection would help eliminate microbiological contamination; water is run
through a watertight chamber containing UV light which produces a lethal dose of UV
light to microorganisms. It is estimated that advanced filtration would cost$150,000,
while UV disinfection would cost$100,000.
8.4 ONGOING STORMWATER MAINTENANCE ITEMS
1. Stormwater Pond and Rain Garden Dredging: Like other cities in the Twin Cities
Metropolitan area, the City of Centerville has many public stormwater ponds and rain
gardens, which may need to be dredged. Dredging will likely be the most financially
cumbersome capital improvement for the City, and prudent financial planning to
accommodate this need is important.
There is some guidance provided by Don Berger, of the MPCA Municipal Division,
entitled Cost Estimates for Minnesota Stormwater Collection Systems. Stormwater
ponds, as do raingardens, need to be dredged frequently to maintain their efficiency.
Dredging will get rid of solid and semisolid wastes, including soil loss from open areas,
8.31
83
( Stantec
CITY OF CENTERVILLE -2018 LOCAL WATER PLAN
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN
litter, sand, leaf litter, construction sediments, and asphalt grit. Costs and dredging
estimates are based on 2010 data, to manage Level 3 contaminated stormwater
sediment (the most contaminated sediment) for disposal. Sediment would be disposed
of at municipal solid waste landfills (MSW) facilities.
Costs of dredging will vary, but several cities have sought to estimate their costs. The
City of Minnetonka worked with Barr Engineering to develop a dredging cost equation.
The equation does not include landfill disposal costs:
Dredge Cost [2009 Dollars] = 78,515 x Volume 0.6727[AF]
The above estimate uses 2009 dollars, so will need to be converted to present day
dollars to account for inflation. The estimate of cost for dredging is roughly $50/cubic
yard. From an additional study for the City of Centerville conducted by Stantec in 2018, it
was determined that there are roughly 35 acres of public ponds and almost one acre of
rain gardens throughout the City.
Even though this estimation provides a framework to understanding potential costs
associated with dredging, exact costs are extremely difficult to predict. Costs will vary on
aspects such as the amount of sediment that is classified as Level 3 (most
contaminated), and the expense of treating at a MSW facility. Thus, it is difficult to
predict how much dredging will cost. As a current member of the Minnesota Cities
Stormwater Coalition (MCSC), the City will work closely with MCSC to determine
appropriate measures for addressing stormwater pond and rain garden dredging, and to
develop a plan moving forward.
2. Local Water Plan Updates: The City of Centerville should be prepared to update its
Local Water Plan every ten years, and when necessary, make updates to goals and
policies throughout the Plan.
8.32
84
Stantec
CITY OF CENTERVILLE -2018 LOCAL WATER PLAN
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN
TABLE 8.1 -STORMWATER CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS AND MAINTENANCE ITEMS,20-YR CYCLE COSTS
Back Yard Drainage Improvements $57,500
LaMotte Stormwater Reuse System $75,000*
Expansion
Hidden Spring Park Reuse System $120,000
Capital LaMotte Stormwater Reuse System
Improvements Upg $250,000
rades
$25,000 every 10 years;
Local Water Plan Updates $5,000 every 5 years on
non- LWP cycle years
Total Capital Improvements Costs $562,500**
Storm Water Pond Dredging (note: assumes $1.15 million for public
1 ft sediment dredged) ponds
Maintenance Storm Water Pond Sediment Disposal $3.13 million for disposal
Items Rain Garden Dredging (note: assumes 1 ft $80,000
sediment dredged)
Rain Garden Sediment Disposal $240,000
Total Maintenance Costs $4,600,000
*Includes, only the city's portion of these costs, per current city policy.
**Includes costs for a 20-year term
8.33
85
( Stantec
CITY OF CENTERVILLE -2018 LOCAL WATER PLAN
STORMWATER CHARGES
9.0 STORMWATER CHARGES
The City of Centerville is currently implementing the following stormwater fees:
Quarterly Stormwater Management Fee (Developed Property)
Residential $9.30 per residential unit
Commercial/Industrial $0.00267 per square foot of impervious, minimum $9.30
per unit
Stormwater Area Charge (With Developer's Agreement)
New Development $0.05739 per square foot of platted area
Stormwater Area Charge (With Building Permit)
Residential $350.00 per residential unit
Commercial/Industrial $0.07 per square foot of building, parking, and other
impervious surfaces
State statutes require that the funds collected through the stormwater area charge program be
used for specific, limited uses. Likewise, fees collected citywide through the quarterly
stormwater utility charge are also designated for specific uses. Below is a summary of how
these charges are to be designated.
Quarterly Stormwater Management Fee
• Regular maintenance of City storm sewer system.
• Regular sediment removal from stormwater ponds.
• Public Works equipment and expenses associated with the regular stormwater system
maintenance program.
• Funding of the Public Information and Education Program.
9.34
86
( Stantec
CITY OF CENTERVILLE -2018 LOCAL WATER PLAN
STORMWATER CHARGES
Stormwater Area Charge
• Improvements to existing systems due to increased load on the system from new
development.
• Construction and maintenance of trunk storm sewer to serve future developments.
• Construction and maintenance of increased ponding capacity to serve future
developments.
As shown above, the City proposes to structure the fees in such a way as to fund ongoing and
long-term maintenance programs out of the bi-monthly fee levied to individual property owners.
Capital costs and improvements necessary from the increased load on the stormwater system
from new developments will be funded from new development stormwater area charges.
9.35
87
( Stantec
CITY OF CENTERVILLE -2018 LOCAL WATER PLAN
AMENDMENT PROCESS
10.0 AMENDMENT PROCESS
10.1 REVIEW AND ADOPTION PROCESS
Review and adoption of this Local Water Plan will follow the procedure outlined in Minnesota
Statutes 10313.235:
`After consideration but before adoption by the governing body, each local unit shall submit its
water management plan to the watershed management organization for review for consistency
with the watershed plan adopted pursuant to section 10313.231...The organization shall approve
or disapprove the local plan or parts of the plan. The organization shall have 60 days to
complete its review; provided, however, that the watershed management organization shall, as
part of its review, take into account the comments submitted to it by the Metropolitan Council
pursuant to subdivision 3a. If the organization fails to complete its review within the prescribed
period, the local plan shall be deemed approved unless an extension is agreed to by the local
unit.'
`Concurrently with its submission of its local water management plan to the watershed
management organization as provided in subdivision 3, each local unit of government shall
submit its water management plan to the Metropolitan Council for review and comment by the
council. The council shall have 45 days to review and comment upon the local plan or parts of
the plan with respect to consistency with the council's comprehensive development guide for the
metropolitan area. The council's 45-day review period shall run concurrently with the 60-day
review period by the watershed management organization and shall send a copy of its
comments to the local government unit. If the Metropolitan Council fails to complete its review
and make comments to the watershed management organization within the 45-day period, the
watershed management organization shall complete its review as provided in subdivision 3.'
`After approval of the local plan by the organization, the local government unit shall adopt and
implement its plan within 120 days and shall amend its official controls accordingly within 180
days.'
10.2 AMENDMENTS TO PLAN AND FUTURE UPDATES
The City of Centerville Local Water Plan will require periodic amendments to address changes
and to remain current with both watershed district and state requirements. Minnesota state
statute requires municipalities to update local water plans within two years following a
watershed district plan update. The Rice Creek Watershed District amended its 2010 RCWD
Water Management Plan in 2016. The City has updated its local LWP for conformance with the
RCWD plan.
10.36
88
( Stantec
CITY OF CENTERVILLE -2018 LOCAL WATER PLAN
AMENDMENT PROCESS
Updates of the Capital Improvement Plan and the Comprehensive Plan may also require an
update of the LWP. Residents or businesses within the City can also petition amendments to
the LWP at any time.
The City will conduct a public hearing on all proposed LWP amendments. Notice of the public
hearing and a description of the proposed amendments shall be published in the local
newspaper at least ten days prior to the date of the hearing. At the hearing, the City will hear all
comments on the proposed LWP amendments.
10.37
89
�. Stantec
CITY OF CENTERVILLE -2018 LOCAL WATER PLAN
APPENDIX
Appendix
90
CITY OF CENTERVILLE
REQUEST FOR
COUNCIL ACTION entervi(Ce
E77
Agenda Item# Department: Requested Council Meeting Date:
Public Works 2/28/2018
TITLE OF ISSUE:
MN Dept. of Health Source Water Protection Implementation Grant
BACKGROUND AND SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION:
Every ten years, the MN Department of Health requires an update of the City's Wellhead Protection Plan
(WHPP). The city's engineering consultant is nearing completion of the update to Part 1 of the WHPP and the
Department of Health has a grant program for assisting with some of the costs associated with the plan
implementation. Attached is a grant application, a proposal from our consultant and information from the
existing Wellhead Protection Plan on the activities covered by the grant.
COST AND SOURCE(S) OF FUNDING:
$9,972 Grant Funded (MN Department of Health) -No matching funds needed.
REQUESTED COUNCIL ACTION:
Motion to authorize Grant Application submittal to the MN Department of Health.
For Clerk's Use:
SUPPORTED DOCUMENTS ATTACHED
Motion By:
Resolution Ordinance Contract Minutes Plan Map
Second By:
Vote Record: A e Nay
King Other(specify) Grant Application, Consultant Proposal,
Love
Paar Supporting Information
Koski
Montain
Administration Department Use:
Refer to:
Consent
Tabled Until:
Regular
Other:
91
DEPARTMENT Environmental Health Division
� HEALTH Drinking Water Protection Section
P.O. Box 64975
St. Paul, Minnesota 55164-0975
Phone: 651-201-4700
Source Water Protection Plan Implementation Grant Application
Applicant Information
Public Water System Name: City of Centerville PWSID: 1020036
Street Address: 1880 Main Street Apartment/Unit#:
city: Centerville County: Anoka zip: 55038
Name of the person who will serve as the Grant Contact: Mark StatZ
Phone: 651-429-3232 Fax: 651-429-8629 Email: mstatz¢ervillemn.com
Federal Tax Id#: 41-1267014
Person Authorized To Sign Application and Grant Agreement on Behalf of the Public Water System
Name: Mark Statz Title: Citv Administrator
Amounts
Total cost of the project: $ 9,972.00
Amount requested from MDH (minimum $1,000, maximum $10,000, or$30,000 if 3 or more PWS's apply
jointly): $ 9,972.00
Check this box if you are currently under an APO (administrative penalty order) in
regards to the Wellhead protection rule.
Work Item 1
For each work item to be funded under the grant, provide the following information (use an additional page if
necessary).
Check this box if the work is a continuation from a previous MDH grant
1. Describe the work that will be performed:
Update potential contamination sources within the DWSMA using state databases as a
starting point, then updating with locally available information. Update the status of existing
sites in the PCSI if that status has changed.
If the work item is about managing one or more potential contaminant sources, are they located in the
DWSMA? • Yes ONo
1a. Amount requested for performing this Work: $ 4,110
1b. Anticipated outcomes (products) of performing this work:
The PCSI and spills inventory in the Wellhead Protection Plan will be updated with the most current
information. This will allow Centerville to prioritize the sites of greatest concern and concentrate future
implementation efforts on those sites, in order to minimize the risks of contaminating the aquifer
serving the community's drinking water supply wells.
1c. Management Strategy/Measure number:Action IIIA Reference the Strategy/Measure
number in the MDH source water protection approved plan (NOT the Draft Copy) or intake protection plan
that will be supported by this work item.Attach the page(s)that contain(s)the source water protection
strategy/measure;
92
OR
Attach the page(s) in the most recent SANITARY SURVEY that contains the action that will be supported by
this work item. (Failure to submit the required documentation may result in disqualification).
Work Item 2
For each work item to be funded under the grant, provide the following information (use an additional
page if necessary).
Check this box if the work is a continuation from a previous MDH grant
2. Describe the work that will be performed:
Conduct a well survey for properties in the DWSMA that are believed to contain a well. Obtain the
current status of these wells through the survey and identify wells that need sealing. Provide
educational information to well owners about proper well maintenance and make well owners aware
of potential grants and cost-sharing programs to assist with well sealing.
If the work item is about managing one or more potential contaminant sources, are they located in the
DWSMA? Yes ONo
2a.Amount requested for performing this Work: $ 2.718
2b. Anticipated outcomes (products) of performing this work:
The Wellhead Protection Plan will be updated to contain the most recent information regarding the
status of wells in the DWSMA. Wells that are in need of sealing can then be targeted with future
implementation efforts to assist property owners with sealing their wells. Property owners will also be
educated on how to best manage their wells and protect them from contamination.
2c. Management StraegyMeasure number: Action IIA Reference the Strategy/Measure
number in the MDH source water protection approved plan (NOT the Draft Copy) or intake protection
plan that will be supported by this work item. Attach the page(s)that contain(s)the source water
protection strategy/measure;
OR
Attach the page(s) in the most recent SANITARY SURVEY that contains the action that will be supported by
this work item. (Failure to submit the required documentation may result in disqualification).
Work Item 3
For each work item to be funded under the grant, provide the following information (use an additional
page if necessary).
Check this box if the work is a continuation from a previous MDH grant
3. Describe the work that will be performed:
Prepare and distribute information on Wellhead Protection planning to residents within the DWSMA.
Publish information in newsletters, website, and annual water quality report on wellhead protection.
Provide educational materials on hazard management to assist property owners in preventing leaks
and spills.
If the work item is about managing one or more potential contaminant sources, are they located in the
DWSMA? ( Yes ONo
3a. Amount requested for performing this Work: $ 3,144
93
3b. Anticipated outcomes (products) ofperforming this work:
Tanks owners in the DWSMA will become aware of their role in helping to safeguard the
community's drinking water aquifer. Information on the management of their tanks will be
conveyed to help minimize the risks of future leaks or spills.
3c Management Strategy/Measure number: Actions IA and 113 Reference the Strategy/Measure
number in the MDH source water protection approved plan (NOT the Draft Copy) or intake protection
plan that will be supported by this work item. Attach the pmge(s)that contain(o)the source water
protectionstra1egy/meaoure
OR
Attach the page(s) in the most recent SANITARY SURVEY that contains the action that will be supported by
this work item. (Failure to submit the required documentation may result in disqualification).
Detailed Budget and Schedule
Describe all tasks that are included in the project with the corresponding costs and estimated date of
completion (use onadditional page/fnecessory).
Tasks: No of hours: (where applicable) Amount: Est. start date:
Task 1: PCSI Update 30 -
4,110 7/1/18
Task 2: Well Survey 14 $ 1 918 9/1/18
Task 2: Printing, postage, etc. $ 800 9/1/18
Task 3: Educational task 12 $ 1,644 11/1/18
Task 3: Printing, postage, etc. $ 1,500 11/1/18
Checklist
Z | have attached required pages from the wellhead plan or sanitary survey to my application.
El | have filled out all the fields in my application.
El | have signed my application.
El | have provided a detailed budget for each work item.
Disclaimer and Signature
I certify that the information herein is true and accurate to the best of my knowledge and I submit this
application on behalf ofthe applicant public water supply system. | acknowledge that the project will
be completed by June 30, 2019 and that all work performed will be done in accordance with all Local,
State and Federal Regulations:
Signature: Date:
Instructions
You may complete this form manually or electronically. Print the information if you opt to do this
manually. Once you are finished, you have three options for submitting the application form to the
Minnesota Department of Health:
Option 1- Mail the form to:
Minnesota Department of Health
SWP Grant Coordinator
P.O. Box 64975
St. Paul, Minnesota 55164-0975
Option 2- Fax the form to:
SWP Grant Coordinator
(651) 201-4701
Option 3- E-mail the form to:
health.swpgrants@state.mn.us
Attention: SWP Grant Coordinator
Definitions of the Terms Used In This Form (In the Order Encountered)
Public Water System Name means the name that is used by the Minnesota Department of Health to
identify the public water system and that is associated with a public water supply system identification
number.
Name of the Grant Contact means the name of the individual who will be responsible for managing the
grant.
Telephone Number means the telephone number of the contact person that the Minnesota Department
of Health can call during its regular business hours (M-F from 8:30 a.m.to 4:30 p.m.).
E-mail means an internet address for the contact person that the Minnesota Department of Health can use
to electronically transmit information related to the grant.
Mailing Address means the mailing address of the public water system that shall be used for
correspondence with MDH.
Name and Title of the Person Authorized to Sign the Grant Agreement on Behalf of the Public Water
System means a person who has authority to administer a financial agreement between the public water
system and the Minnesota Department of Health.
Total Grant Amount Being Requested means the sum of the costs of the work items that are identified in
the grant application (1a + 2a +3a +....)
Work Item is the source water protection activity measure from the WHP plan that are to be performed
under this part of the grant application. Fill one box for each activity included in the project;feel free to
insert more boxes if needed.
Amount requested for performing this work means the estimated amount requested by the grantee for
completing the activity performed under this part of the application.
Product(s) produced or anticipated outcomes of performing this work means the tangible results of
performing the work that is funded by this grant.
95
DWSMA—Drinking Water Supply Management Area; is the Minnesota Department of Health (MDH)
approved surface and subsurface area surrounding a public water system well that completely contains the
scientifically calculated wellhead protection area.
Correspondence from MDH or Section of the sanitary survey or page number(s) in the source water
protection plan that reference the source water protection measures that will be supported by this work
item—self-explanatory.
Detailed Budget means a breakdown of costs with a detailed description of all costs. Costs must be based
on a written estimate from the contractor/vendor and must be attached to the application.The total
must match the dollar amount that is being requested.The number of hour's column must be filled out
only for activities that involve hiring of a consultant.
Estimated start date means the date when you expect to start the work.
To request this document in a different format please call Section Receptionist: 651-201-4700
Rev.02/2018
96
City of Centerville
WELLHEAD PROTECTION PLAN
tervt(te ,
Part 2:
December 12, 2007
97
Chapter 5
Plan of Action
I. PUBLIC EDUCATION PROGRAM
An education program is critical to protect the City's water supply and gain the cooperation
of property owners and businesses within the DWSMAs. A packet will be developed to
present the various education materials to the property owners and others within the
DWSMAs. Additional packets will be provided to new property owners and facility
operators.
A. Wellhead Protection Awareness Project
Objective: The cooperation of property owners, facility operators and others is critical for
the City to achieve our wellhead protection goals. The Wellhead Protection Awareness
Program is intended to gain the cooperation of residents and business operators in the
City's wellhead protection efforts.
Actions:
(1) The Wellhead Protection Plan Manager will notify property owners that they are located
within the City's DWSMA. The notification will include a wellhead protection education
packet providing information on the City's wellhead protection program.
(2) The Wellhead Protection Plan Manager will installed signs in the right of way indicating
the boundaries of the DWSMAs.
(3) The Wellhead Protection Plan Manager will include wellhead protection information in
their annual water quality report of their water supply system.
(4) The Wellhead Protection Plan Manager will prepare a press release and issue a briefing
report for newspaper and other media outlets on timely issues that coincide with an
initiative such as an abandoned well information meeting or the installation of DWSMA
zone signs.
(5) The Wellhead Protection Plan Manager will make DWSMA maps available to
consultants, septic system evaluators, and other interested persons that perform
environmental evaluations.
Cooperator(s): [City] Anoka County Municipal Wellhead Planning Group, Anoka County
Environmental Services, Rice Creek Watershed District
Time Frame: 2 112 years from the completion of the plan.
Estimated Cost: ($ 1.50 per parcel within DVVSMA)
Goal Achieved:
(1) Preparation and delivery of a wellhead protection information packet.
(2) Installation of ROW signs indicating the boundary of DWSMAs.
(3) Annual Water Quality Report that includes WHP update.
(4) Rice Creek Watershed District will provide assistance with education through their
water use and conservation awareness programs.
B. Hazardous Materials Management Education
Objective: Educate residents and businesses regarding proper handling, use, storage, and
disposal of hazardous materials within the DWSMAs through augmentation of existing
2007-12-12 Page 17
Centerville Wellhead Protection Plan (Part 2)
98
environmental education programs. This initiative will not address businesses that are
currently licensed hazardous waste generators which are required to meet State
management standards.
Actions:
(1) The Wellhead Protection Plan Manager will include proper management of hazardous
materials and waste information into the Wellhead Protection Awareness education
packet. The packet will include contact numbers to obtain consultative services from
City, County and State program staff (i.e. utilities, hazardous waste management, and
petroleum tanks programs).
(2) The Wellhead Protection Plan Manager will utilize newsletters, cable access, news
releases and other forums to promote the proper management of hazardous materials
including use of the Anoka County Household Hazardous Waste drop-off facility.
Cooperator(s): Anoka County Integrated Waste Management Unit
Time Frame: 2 112 years from the completion of the plan.
Estimated Cost: ($0.50 per parcel within DWSMA)
Goal Achieved:
(1) Preparation and delivery of a Hazardous Materials Management information packet.
(2) A 5% increase in the number of households that utilizes the Anoka County Household
Hazardous Waste drop-off facility.
II. OTHER WELLS MANAGEMENT
The presence of other wells within the City's DWSMAs presents the potential for
contamination sources, at or near land surface, to be rapidly introduced into the aquifer
used by the City's wells. Eventually, all wells become unused or unusable. State law
requires unused wells to be properly sealed. However, the location and status of wells has
not been adequately monitored.
A. Seal Abandoned Wells
Objective: Enhance the protection of the City's wells by Cooperating with the MDH Well
Management Program to seal all abandoned wells within the DWSMAs.
Actions:
(1) The Wellhead Protection Plan Manager will investigate potential sources of financial
assistance and the establishment of a program to assist property owners in sealing their
abandoned wells. The investigation will include Federal and State grant programs and
a City low-interest loan program.
(2) The Wellhead Protection Plan Manager will notify property owners with the probability of
a well located on their property. The notification will include contact numbers for
property owners to obtain consultative services regarding methods to locate and seal
abandoned wells and an announcement of a public informational meeting.
(3) The Wellhead Protection Plan Manager will sponsor a public meeting in which MDH
Well Management staff will provide an informational program and answer questions.
(4) The Wellhead Protection Plan Manager will request that the MDH provide a copy of well
sealing reports. The location of the sealed wells will be verified and placed in the
building officials parcel files.
(5) The Building Official will incorporate the list of probable wells into the City's Building
2007-12-12 Page 18
Centerville Wellhead Protection Plan (Part 2)
99
records. When application is made to demolish a building the records will be reviewed
to determine if a well search is required.
Cooperator(s): Minnesota Department of Health and Anoka County Environmental
Services.
Time Frame: 5 years from the approval of the plan.
Estimated Cost: ($0.20 per parcel within DWSMA)
Goal Achieved:
(1) Completion of the investigation and actions initiated.
(2) Completion of notification to property owners.
(3) Completion of public meeting.
(4) Incorporation of probable well sites into City parcel files.
B. Monitor Well Construction
Objective: Cooperate with the MDH Well Management Program to monitor and maintain
accurate records of the construction of wells within the City. This project will improve the
location accuracy of constructed wells by having a local official verify the location
information submitted by the licensed well contractor.
Actions:
(1) The City Wellhead Protection Plan Manager will request the MDH to provide a copy of
reports for new well construction in the City. The City will place the copy into the
building official's file for the parcel. If information regarding the location of the well is
insufficient to determine the parcel location - the City will notify the MDH and request
that they follow up with the licensed well contractor to obtain sufficient information.
(2) The City Building Official will place the copy of the well record in the parcel file which is
reviewed when application is made for building permits or lot development.
(3) The City Utilities Department will require owners of buildings that switch from a private
well to City water submit a copy of the well sealing report within 6 months. If the well
remains in use the property owner must submit a statement of the intended use of the
well. The well sealing report or statement of intended use will be forwarded to the
building official to be place in the parcel file.
Cooperator(s): Minnesota Department of Health.
Time Frame: 5 years from the approval of the plan.
Estimated Cost: ($0.20 per parcel within DWSMA)
Goal Achieved:
The goal is for sustained monitoring of constructed wells through a cooperative effort of the
City and MDH. This is an ongoing project without a date for completion.
III. CONTAMINANT SOURCES
A. Potential Contaminant Source Inventory (PCSI)
Objective: Track the extent of potential contaminant sources located inside the City's
vulnerable DWSMA. The PCSI will be maintained to monitor contaminant sources.
2007-12-12 Page 19
Centerville Wellhead Protection Plan (Part 2)
100
Actions:
(1) The Wellhead Protection Plan Manager will maintain its PCSI database making updates
to the inventory as new information is collected.
(2) The Wellhead Protection Plan Manager will regularly request that Anoka County
Community Health and Environmental Services Department provide updates of
potential contaminant source information from its Environmental Site Index. The City
will incorporate new and changed information into its PCSI database.
Cooperator(s): Anoka County Community Health and Environmental Services
Department
Time Frame: This is an ongoing activity.
Estimated Cost: ($0.071yr. per parcel within DWSMAs)
Goal Achieved:
(1) Current PCSI database.
(2) Demonstrated cooperation between the City and Anoka County.
IV. CITY PROGRAMS INTEGRATION
A. Zoning, Development, and Redevelopment Controls
Objective: Determine the compatibility of utilizing City land use and development programs
to enhance wellhead protection.
Actions:
(1) The Wellhead Protection Manager will make presentations before the City Council,
Zoning Board and other relative committees about methods to enhance the City's
wellhead protection plan.
(2) The Wellhead Protection Manager will consult with planning and zoning officials to
determine the feasibility of modifying official controls to support the protection of the
City's water supply wells. Draft modifications will be presented in the form and manner
required for consideration.
Cooperator(s): City Council and staff
Time Frame: 2 years from the completion of the plan.
Estimated Cost: ($0.12 per parcel within DWSMA)
Goal Achieved:
(1) WHP Manager's presentation to City Council and other committees.
(2) City consideration of modification of official controls to support wellhead protection.
B. Incorporate Wellhead Protection Initiates into City Plans
Objective: The City will use this Wellhead Protection Plan as a resource when updating its
Comprehensive Plan, local water management plan, water supply plan, and other relevant
plans.
2007-12-12 Page 20
Centerville Wellhead Protection Plan (Part 2)
101
Il,, Stantec
February 21, 2018
Attention: Mark Statz
City of Centerville
1880 Main Street
Centerville, MN 55038
Dear Mr. Statz,
Reference: Proposal for Wellhead Protection Implementation
At your request,we have put together the following proposal of hours and costs to assist you with
the MDH (Minnesota Department of Health) implementation grant you are applying for.This
proposal assumes the following work will be an additional service to the existing Wellhead
Protection Plan contract, billed as a separate task to assist in tracking costs for grant
reimbursement.
Task 1: Potential Contaminant Source Inventory Update
This task will implement Action IIIA of your existing Wellhead Protection Plan. The task involves
creating an updated inventory of potential contamination sources within the DWSMA. This
includes a search of the State's databases, looking for additions or changes the sites that are
already within the Potential Contaminant Source Inventory. Since the State's databases may not
always contain accurate location information or site status, additional work will be done to refine
the inventory accordingly.The end product of this effort will be an updated potential
contamination source inventory, including maps, tables, and a GIS-compatible database in the
MDH's preferred format. The effort will consist of the following:
Update PCSI inventory, maps, and database (30 hours) $4,110
Task Total $4,110
Task 2: Well Survey
This task will implement Action IIA of the your existing Wellhead Protection Plan.The well survey will
aid in identifying and locating wells that were not previously captured as part of the original well
inventory effort and/or update records on the status of existing wells within the DWSMA. The
mailing will also include information regarding well sealing grants and cost-sharing programs and
will also provide educational materials regarding proper well maintenance. Prior to compiling the
survey, Stantec will update the current well inventory using available databases (including County
Well Index) to ensure that the properties that most likely have wells will be included in the survey.
Following the survey, Stantec will also update the inventory to incorporate new information
gathered from the survey. This effort will consist of the following:
Compile Inventory of Properties to Be Surveyed (6 hours) $822
Assist with providing survey materials (4 hours) $548
Compile Survey Results (4 hours) $548
Task Total $1,918
102
k.l..
February 21,2018
Mark Stafz
Page 2 of 3
Reference: Proposal for Wellhead Protection Implementation
Task 3: Public Education
This task will implement Actions IA and IB of your existing Wellhead Protection Plan. The task will
include the preparation of materials to be distributed to residents in the DWSMA, including articles,
brochures, and website materials.This effort will include information on general wellhead
protection management, along with hazardous waste materials, This effort will consist of the
following:
Prepare and compile materials for distribution (12 hours) $1,644
Task Total $1,644
The total cost for all three tasks to proposed to be $7,672.
For the well survey and distribution of articles and brochures, it is assumed that Centerville staff will
undertake the physical mailing and distribution.Therefore, it is recommended that an additional
$2,300 be obtained through the grant program to cover the costs of printing, postage,
publications, and associated expenses. This can be split to include $800 for the well survey mailing
and $1,500 for the public education component.
Schedule
Stantec proposes the following time line to undertake the tasks.
Task Proposed
Completion
Update PCSI Database Jul -Au ust 2018
Update Well Inventory for Survey Se tember 2018
Mail Surveys October 2018
Compile Survey Results November 2018
Compile Public Education Materials November 2018
Distribute and Publish Materials December 2018
Re ort Project Results to MDH for Grant Reimbursement February 2019
All grant activities must be concluded by June 30, 2019.
103
k.l..
February 21,2018
Mark Stafz
Page 3 of 3
Reference: Proposal for Wellhead Protection Implementation
We hope this proposal will meet your expectations. We are ready to begin work on this
implementation effort once you have obtained your implementation grant and the grant
agreement is signed.
Please call me at 651-604-4831 if you have any questions.
Regards,
Stantec Consulting Services, Inc.
Mark Janovec, PG
Senior Scientist
mark.janovec@stantec.com
104
CITY OF CENTERVILLE
REQUEST FOR
COUNCIL ACTION e n t e ry (fe
E77
Agenda Item# Department. Requested Council Meeting Date:
Public Works 2/28/2018
TITLE OF ISSUE:
Peltier Lake Drive
BACKGROUND AND SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION:
In order to complete the pump replacement and other work on Lift Station 92, a by-pass pump set-up will need
to be installed for a period of two (2) consecutive days to pump wastewater from the lift station (located at the
intersection of Peltier Lake Drive and Mill Road) to City manhole#206 (on Mill Road). This will include road
signage to alert traffic to the piping crossing the road and road guards over the pumping hose. An unarmed
security person will be on site from 7:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m. each day and will be identified by a marked security
vehicle to ensure the pump is not shut down. A secondary pump will be on site at all times as a back-up
resource. When the repairs to the lift station are completed, by others, and the pump is no longer needed, the
contractor will tear down the set-up and related signage.
COST AND SOURCE(S) OF FUNDING:
$14,185.68 - Sewer Fund
REQUESTED COUNCIL ACTION:
Motion to approve submitted quote by Olson's Sewer Service in an amount not to exceed
14,185.68.
For Clerk's Use:
SUPPORTED DOCUMENTS ATTACHED
Motion By: Resolution Ordinance Contract Minutes Plan Map
Second By:
Vote Record: A e Nay
King Other(specify) Quote
Love
Paar
Koski
Montain
Administration Department Use:
Refer to:
Consent
Tabled Until:
Regular -___�
Other:
105
Olson's Sewer Service, Inc. Olson's Excavating Service
17638 Lyons Street NE
10L Forest Lake, MN 55025
(651) 464-2082 e Fax: (651) 464-9029
PROPOSAL SUBMITTED TO PHONE DATE
City of Centerville, ATTN: Greg Burmeister 651-429-3232 02/20/2018
STREET JOB NAME
1880 Main Street Wastewater Bypass
CITY,STATE AND ZIP CODE JOB LOCATION
Centerville, MN 55038 Intersection Peltier Drive and Mill Road
ARCHITECT/DESIGNER DATE OF PLANS JOB PHONE
City of Centerville gburmeister@centervillemn.com
We hereby submit specifications and estimates for:
We will install a bypass pump set up for a period of two consecutive days to pump wastewater from the
lift station located at the intersection of Peltier Drive and Mill Road to City manhole #206. This will
include road signage to alert traffic to the piping crossing the road and road guards over the pumping
hose. An unarmed security person will be on site from 7:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m. each day and will be
identified by a marked security vehicle to insure the pump is not shut down. A secondary pump will be
on site at all times as a back-up resource. When the repairs to the lift station are completed by others
and the pump is no longer needed we will tear down the set-up and related signage. If an alarm alerts
the City is responsible for alerting Olson's Sewer Service to address the issue. No permits included.
The cost for this work is $14,185.68.
Any person or company supplying labor or materials for this improvement to your property may file a lien against
your property if that person or company is not paid for the contributions. Under Minnesota law, you have the right
to pay persons who supplied labor or materials for this improvement directly and deduct this amount from our
contract price, or withhold the amounts due from us until 120 days after completion of the improvement unless we
give you a lien waiver signed by persons who supplied the labor or material for the improvement and who gave you
timely notice. We reserve the right to file a lien if payment in full is not received within 30 days of the invoice date.
Any additional costs will be added to the bill for interest, legal expenses, attorney fees, and/or collection costs.
We Propose hereby to furnish material and labor— complete in accordance with above specifications, for the sum of:
FOURTEEN THOUSAND ONE HUNDRED EIGHTY-FIVE AND 68/100 DOLLARS $14,185.68
Payment to be made as follows:
TO BE PAID IN FULL WITHIN 30 DAYS OF RECEIPT OF THE INVOICE.
A SIGNED CONTRACT IS NECESSARY TO PERFORM THE WORK DESCRIBED ABOVE.
All material is guaranteed to be as specified. All work to be completed in aworkmanlike manner Authorized Signature
according to standard practices.All agreements contingent upon strikes,accidents or delays beyond JON M. OLSON
our control. Owner to carry fire,tornado and other necessary insurance. Our workers are fully
covered by Workmen's Compensation insurance.
Note: We may withdraw this proposal if not accepted within 15 da s.
Acceptance of Proposal —The above prices,specifications and
conditions are satisfactory and are hereby accepted. You are authorized to Signature
do the work as specified. Payment will be made as outlined above. x
Date of Acceptance_x Signature
X
Keep Your Sewer in the Pink! www.olsonsinthepink.com
106
Administrator/Engineer's Report
enterVille February 28, 2018
+:.I�r7.7771
ADMINISTRATION
Vacation Schedule
I will be on vacation, from March 13 — 19th. This means I will miss the March 10 City
Council meeting. Clerk Bender will attend the meeting, in my place.
Administrator Continuing Education Plan
No recent activity
Social Media Presence
City staff continues to work with Facebook to"verify" our account and to ensure its
operation is independent of our staff s personal accounts.
2018 City Council Goals
A 2018 Goal Setting Meeting is scheduled for this meeting.
Staff Meetings
A monthly staff meeting was held on February 8th
STORMWATER/WETLAND
Local Water Plan
A draft of the Local Water Plan was presented by our consulting engineer at the last
meeting. We will look to authorize distribution of the plan to the Rice Creek Watershed
District and Met Council at our next meeting. If the City Council has any comments on
the plan, they should be submitted soon. The deadline for submittal is June of 2018.
Storm Water Capital Improvement Plan and Rate Study
Upon submittal of the Local Water Plan, we will utilize some of the information
from that plan to formulate a rate study. The study will also need to pull
information from the City's Comprehensive Plan.
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT/PLANNING
United Properties' 21st Ave. Distribution Center Developer's Agreement Fulfilment
A Letter of Credit(LOC) has now been received, from United Properties for the overlay
of Fairview Avenue. This means that United Properties has now fulfilled all of its
obligations under the developer's agreement for 21st Avenue.
107
Peltier Estates
The developer pulled a demolition permit for the two buildings on the site and plans to
submit an application for Final Plat, later this week. That should then go to the Planning
Commission for review at their March 6' meeting.
Ruffridge Johnson
Council agreed to pay for private utilities to be run along Commerce Drive, to the site.
The final cost of this is being worked out.
The current project timeline has a closing date on the sale of the property for April 3rd
Due to the terms of some of the financing and tax incentive mechanisms being used,
construction of the project will proceed quickly after the sale of the property, with
completion in September of this year.
Waterworks Site/DeFoe Property
A concept sketch for a residential development is being presented to the Planning and
Zoning Commission at their March 6th meeting.
City-Owned Property
The party interested in the Block 7 property (downtown)is coming to city hall for an
informal meeting to discuss his thoughts on this property and others in town on
Wednesday, the 28th
On this agenda, staff is recommending dropping property insurance on the home and
garage at 1737 Main Street.
Swimming Pool Covers
The Planning and Zoning Commission asked staff to look into policies which allow a
hard pool cover in lieu of a fence. The city of Blaine currently has such a policy. Staff is
researching policies in neighboring communities, but is strongly opposed to a change.
SEWER AND WATER
Lift Station 2 Rehabilitation
We have received executed contracts and insurance information from the contractor and
are working to set up a pre-construction date. City staff is arranging for by-pass pumping
and traffic control during the project.
Downtown Water Main
I attended a meeting at Anoka County where staff gave their recommendations for
funding through the Community Development Block Grant program. Our application did
NOT make staffs list of projects to be funded. I will discuss further details at the
meeting.
108
PUBLIC WORKS/STREETS
Lino Lakes LaMotte Neighborhood Street and Utility Reconstruction
Lino Lakes city staff believes that a street project will be put forward, but may not
include adding municipal water service.
Labor Union Negotiations
The labor union has accepted the contract terms offered by the city council. Formal
contract language will be drafted in the coming weeks.
PARKS
Skating Rink
The warming house has been closed for the winter. The warmer temps have made
keeping ice on the hockey rink difficult. The please rink will remain open as long as
weather permits.
Dupre Artifact Agreement
Cataloging of the artifacts is nearly complete.
Parks Capital Improvement Plan and Park Dedication Fee Study
I attended the January Park and Rec Meeting to discuss the structure of Park Dedication
Fees and the need for a comprehensive study to properly justify those fees. We will bring
a proposal forward, for Council's review, to complete a formal Park and Trails Master
Plan.
Centennial School District Community Education
Community Education Director Cori Sendle asked me to thank the city council for their
donation. We submitted information on our Music in the Park program and the Bald
Eagle Waterski Shows to be included in their spring booklet.
PUBLIC SAFETY
Centennial Fire District
• A garage fire on Mound Court was successfully put out by our department, with
minimal damage to the garage.
Centennial Lakes Police Department
• A death investigation is underway for an incident which occurred on Sunday,
February 25th, in Centerville. All inquiries should be directed to the police chief.
There is not thought to be any danger to the public.
109
� asr-�.
sr i7-2-910
BLUME,No jo-,o-1149
CHECK NO.
AMOUNT
Memo: 2017 FranchNe Fees 13239 Feb 21,2018 ***A***$13,940,64
PAY
HMxil-
Thirteen Thousand Elms Hundred Forty and 64/100 Dollars
City of Centerville
1880 Math Street
Centerville, 55038
cs
0
fa1
lN
xr x
Na
t:
I
%
0 ._.
0 L :
0
C�—
LL 110
------
x zx: x
Y
11%11.1 4
1%
t
RECEIVED BY CITIES IN 2018
MEMBER 2015 FRANCHISE FEES
CITIES COMMISSION RVI` w. B
tr, ,
x.. I
TOT 1,323,907 923,907 400,000
........
2017 TOTAL CITYREVENUE
.................... ........
Blaine $14,533,757 $26,474,669 54.89684%
Centerville $922,685 $26,474,669 3:4UM%
Circle Pines $1,223,563 $26,474,669 4,62277%
Ham Lake $3,625,992 $26,474,669 13.70741%
Lexington $463,552 $26,474,669 1.75104%
Lhasa Lakes $4,239,047 $26,474,669 16"01171 O
a Lake Park $1,462,743 $26,474,669 552507%
wwwwwwv ... xxxxx
TM
r
>_____ ........ ...... .v..v..v.:x
: H
CITY REVENUE TOTAL
FRANCHISE FEES AS% F FRANCHISE
RETAINED SYSTEM 11 RES RE TAINED
Blaine $400,000 X 54.89684% 5219,58736
Centerville $400,000 X 3,48516% $13,940,64
Circle Pines $400,000 x 4,652277% $15,491x08
Ham Laky $400,000 X 13,70741% $54,829,64
Lexington $400,000 X 1.75104% = $7,004.16
Lino o Lakes $400,000 X 16.01171% $64,046.84
Spring Lake Dark $400,000 X, 5.52507% - $22,100,27
.. ..... „....
} "uv
} ¥; uvv
,
wwwwwwv xxxxxxxxx xxx...... ....._..................................... .....................................................uvuvuvuv:uvuvuvuvuvuvuvuvuvuvuvwx.xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx_wnn nnnnnnnnn nnnnnnnnnnn�
I All amounts are ro ar ded to nearest
dollar.
111