HomeMy WebLinkAbout2018-04-11 CC Packet t CITY OF CENTERVILLE COUNCIL MEETING
enter iC e Wednesday, April 11, 2018
6:30 p.m. or shortly thereafter
COUNCIL MEETING
L CALL TO ORDER
1. Roll Call
II. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
III. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
IV. APPOINTMENTS/PRESENTATIONS
1. Mr. Eric Maase, WSB—Review of Land Use, Housing & Transportation Chapters
of Comprehensive Plan (Pages 1-45)
V. PUBLIC HEARING
1. None.
VL APPROVAL OF MINUTES
1. March 28, 2018 City Council Meeting Minutes ****Email Monday*
VII. CONSENT AGENDA
1. City of Centerville March 28, 2018 through April 11, 2018 Claims (Check#31751-
31775)W/Voided Check#30182 (Pages 46-48)
2. Centennial Lakes Police Claims through April 5, 2018 (Check#11900-11916) &
Optum Bank& US Bank(Pages 49-50)
3. Centennial Fire District Claims through April 3, 2018 (Check#8157-8162) & WEX,
HAS & US Bank(Page 51)
4. Successful Completion of Year 5, Building Inspection Mr. Dan Schmitz
5. P & Z Recommendation for Appointment (Page 52)
6. P & R Recommendation for Appointment (Page 53)
VIII. OLD BUSINESS
1. RFPs Solid Waste, Recycling & Yard Waste Collection (Page 54)
IX. NEW BUSINESS
1. Schedule Regular City Council Work Sessions— (1 per month) (Page 55)
2. Parks & Recreation Committee Recommendation for Adding One (1)Additional
ADA Accessible Port-a-Pot to the City's AirFresh Contract ($500-$625) (Page 56)
3. MCMA Conference Attendance— City Admin. Statz (Page 57)
X. COUNCIL/ADMINISTRATOR ANNOUNCEMENTS
XL ADJOURNMENT
*INFORMATIONAL MATERIAL**
RCWD Legislative Support of HF2687/SF 2419 (Pages 58-59)
Midwest Events (Page 60)
*REMINDERS**
P&R Committee—Wednesday, May 2, 2018 —6:30 p.m. City Hall
P&Z Committee— Tuesday May 1 2018 —6:30 p.m. City Hall
m City Council Meeting—Wednesday, April 25, 2018 —6:30 p.m. City Hall
City Council Meeting—Wednesday, May 9, 2018 —6:30 p.m. City Hall
Recycling Saturdays: 9:00 a.m. — 12:00 p.m. (Green Lights Recycling, 1525 — 99th Lane N.E.,
Blaine)
April 14, May 12, June 9, July 14, August 11, September 8, October 13, November 10 & December
8, 2018
CITY OF CENTERVILLE
REQUEST FOR
COUNCIL ACTION entervi(fe
Agenda Item# Department: Requested Council Meeting Date:
Administration April 11, 2018
TITLE OF ISSUE:
Land Use, House& Transportation Chapters of City's Comprehensive Plan
BACKGROUND AND SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION:
Mr. Eric Maas, WSB will be on hand to review the above stated sections with Council.
COST AND SOURCE(S) OF FUNDING:
REQUESTED COUNCIL ACTION:
Please review contents of the packet.
For Clerk's Use:
SUPPORTED DOCUMENTS ATTACHED
Motion By:
Resolution Ordinance Contract Minutes Plan Map
Second By:
Vote Record: Ave Nay
King Other(specify)
Love
Paar
R Koski
Montain
Administration Department Use:
Refer to:
Consent
Tabled Until:
Regular
Other:
1
Centerville 2040 Chapter 3: Land Use
CHAPTER I LAND USE
AND �JSE
The Land Use Chapter identifies the specific land use categories and strategies for future
growth and redevelopment in Centerville. The land use categories are the framework upon
which the official controls, such as the zoning ordinance and subdivision regulations, are
based. The plan elements contain the regulatory concepts for residential growth, commercial
and industrial development and environmental protection. The plan elements and land use
planning decisions are based on Goals and Policies developed during the Comprehensive
Plan update process. It is the goal of the City of Centerville to:
• Create a logical and orderly transition from agricultural to non-agricultural land uses.
• Establish a future land use plan that contains compatible land use patterns.
• Establish land use patterns which protect natural amenities and avoid environmental
constraints.
• Establish phased growth areas which reflect City priorities for development staging
and contiguous, planned extensions of public infrastructure.
• Utilize the City's design guidelines for development within the Mixed Use/Central
Business District.
• Enhance the character of individual neighborhoods and the sense of overall
community identity.
• Expand the commercial/industrial tax base and employment opportunities in the City.
Policies reflect the position of the City on the specific implementation of the Goals. It is the
policy of the City of Centerville to:
• Identify a long range land use plan which incorporates community goals.
• Establish roadway and trail corridors which link neighborhoods, parks, business
centers and other community facilities together as well as amenities in adjacent
communities.
• Identify land which is suitable for commercial development and is accessible to
existing and planned roadways and compatible with existing and planned land uses.
• Limit development to areas identified with utility capability or staged according to
growth sequencing plans.
• Prohibit residential development with private utilities in areas included in the long
range public utility service area.
• Require all subdivisions to adhere to long range plans for thoroughfares, trails, parks
and utility corridors to ensure continuity of development patterns and implementation
of community priorities.
Chapter 3 1 Page 1
2
Centerville 2040 Chapter 3: Land Use
Centerville is currently over 85% developed and within the 2040 planning cycle will likely
approach or reach full build out. The focus of the 2040 Comprehensive Plan is to focus
on the appropriate land uses for the small amount of remaining vacant land, and some
emerging opportunities for redevelopment.
jROWTH SSUMPTIONS AND I.AND `AVAILABILITY
It is estimated there are a combined 370 acres of land identified in the existing land use
as vacant or agricultural land in Centerville. The City is currently entirely within the
Metropolitan Urban Service Area (MUSA). Future development in Centerville will be
limited to a few key areas of the City. These areas were the focus of the Planning
Commission and City Council during the plan update process. These areas included:
commercial and industrial land near the City's eastern border, agricultural and vacant
land near the northern and southern borders, and redevelopment areas near the
downtown and the lakes. Map 1-3 shows the actual use of the land in Centerville today,
regardless of planned land use. This map identifies vacant land, and provides a basis for
future planning.
Table 16 below shows existing land use acres in Centerville based on the 2030 Future
Land Use Map.
Gross Acres Percentage
Low Density Residential 615 39.4%
Medium Density Residential 105 6.7%
High Density Residential 47 3.0%
..........................................................................o........
CBD/Mixed Use 27 1.7/°
Commercial 99 6.3%
Industrial 79 5.10/0
Public/Semi-Public 48 3.1%
City Park 36 2.3%
Regional Park 144 9.2%
Right of Way 164 10.6%
Water 196 12.6%
Total 1,560 1000/0
Chapter 3 Page 2
3
Centerville 2040 Chapter 3: Land Use
Map 3-1 shows the areas of change that were the focus of the plan update. Alternative
land use scenarios were developed for these areas during the planning process, with the
existing 2030 comprehensive plan land use designations for those parcels shown in Map
3-1. A breakdown of the 2030 land use designations for the five focus areas and the
proposed land use designation changes are shown below in Table 17. The agreed upon
2040 Future Land Use Designations are shown in Map 3-2, 2040 Future Land Use.
Area.... Acreage........'.........L2030 .'.........', 2040
.. .........................................
A 6.7 Public/Semi-Public Low Density Residential
B 0.9 Commercial Public/Semi-Public
C 7.2 High Density Residential Medium Density
& Commercial Residential
D 1.7 Low Density Residential CBD/Mixed Use
E 6.7 Low Density Residential CBD/Mixed Use
Chapter 3 Page 3
4
m ap
w
m NQ
3Sf 31tl1SN31N1 �¢S;CPZE35E ASH/b� n __- Jb'
MAW ST TO Ne M1'� °13sF OTTER LAKE SERVICE RO Da 3Ntll x3110
1S NlywO �1b1Sa}1NI aN 'N
1� 3SE 31tl15a31N195011S NItlW M
Sf�
s
�a'1NI 9S
��5 r
2185 P
3Atl-S4 m
_ I p
U
ON
O
m - z - 3Ab H10Z_
Q 3Atl AlINn � - I ��
m0 z
PNIN LAKES AVE � 4 a �
,pJJ WAV COTTON W000 It!
t) b
A. 1 tlwn
G
d•
O
m
� 3Atl OtlHS
X � lOfMl
y G
� m m lal NOStl313d O� W iJ �
Q ly >p aImWVO F
t O '
OLD MILL RO Da InIW - W� N ?f
F z
o - Op PHEASANT
N CV 9/C
MALLARD WA
D
OiI�N i0 il0`J ir/f� � N19901�
p ) y} F
V
' BEAVER PONOS
�p a10�
w
O m�l
3
m
a,
o
MD
y -� Y ik I
ORfEK pq
Odd �P�R p
CLEAR
39E 31tl1SM31N1 MgIN Bi i0 rvB bNTtiRs�P� 1SN/b�D(�g n �O J
1S/ylbK. F�1b1Sa31N19N TTER LAKE SERVICE RO
O� M�S,f 3SE 31tl1$M31N19$011$NItlW
�s
��1N1 9S
J�5 r
2155 P uJi
_ 3Atl 1542 --- r w
a rc
o a
W
a0
O - w
5 C
�1N LAKES AVE � ' OOA �'�
COTTONW OO �i
lY0 Nb/ �WAY c,C lOgtlW nS
d�
m _ "
K 3Atl ptlHS 1jjMl -
O
y
O 1111 NOS21313d I W
J O w L1 V Oi W t7
Q - W Yp-. MIO]Id0
OLD MILL OH.l91W
o � K gHEASANT 1:N
R m CV W� •
2 ��' MALL•ARD WAY
� Od
RNOOd ~ 4 d
Il 3 i.W�a
� 2 3 -0tiN j0 iIODI � N1�3D01�
BEAVER P------
Y
W d
e. o
la
F
_ a
'j ey Q
r _ O
J �
O I
�y:e
q..
EEyfoR�
��'' OLEAR`!✓P�� m�
3SE 31tl1SM31N167gIN Si TO N9\NTtiR5SP�35E ASN/b�0�S£ d 'CSO _
1S �1tl1SM31NI ON TTER LAKE SERVICE RD r w
N/bk,
31tl15M31N1.8011S Nil Al M
Sfd
S
b�1Nl 9S
J�5
2\sT P
3AV-ls cz w
.w
z
�l! Q
DEER 4Q 3Atl•AlIND m <D �[. ®�" -
�\ry\.AKES AVE G O4A � 4 i
�pJJ WAV COTTONW00 � -
yONy/ — GA. 10 OtlWOS -' I
T
� 3Atl OtlHS
F t7dr O F % .J
MIOR
� u e3 KE
OLD MILL AD �.;
`RG N CL0 998if0 N` Y �7%�
/: Z MAL•L•ARD WA'
E
Z ���Q Dlfl3.11IAM3'1N30"
p :�•F Y��. � 901
� 2a OM NO�IOD �,J W Nl3 d'
W BEAVER PDNO�AY
1
OM
LL
15 0
CL
z
g-a
M
w
a
vy O
j
v
h.
�lrx
Centerville 2040 Chapter 3: Land Use
The 2040 Future Land Use Plan (Map 3-2) identifies the land use designations for
development in the City. Most of the remaining gross vacant land will be dedicated to
residential development. The downtown area will include a mixture of residential uses
and retail or office uses with the southern portion of Main Street focused on
redevelopment to commercial uses as market demand allows. Table 18 shows the acres
corresponding to the Future Land Use Plan.
2040 Future Land Use Gross Acres Percentage
Low Density Residential 613.3 39.3%
Medium DensityResidential 112.2 7.2%
High Density Residential 40.1 2.6%
CBD/Mixed Use 35.0 2.3%
Commercial 98.1 6.1%
Industrial ' 78.8 51.1%
............. .................................................o.......
Public/Semi-Public 42.2 2.7/0
City Park 36.3 2.3%
Regional Park 144.0 9.2%
Right of Way 164.0 10.6%
Water 196.0 12.6%
Chapter 3 Page 7
8
Centerville 2040 Chapter 3: Land Use
The Metropolitan Council requires a calculation of the net density of areas of
planned residential development for areas identified for development or
redevelopment. They require a minimum density of three units per net
developable acre for communities with the "Emerging Suburban Edge" community
designation. Table 19 shows net density in these areas and Map 3-3 identifies
those areas. Wetlands, floodplain and right of way were all subtracted from each of
the areas to arrive at a net acreage. Using the preferred land use guiding and
density midpoints, the number of potential new units for the change areas was
calculated. It is estimated that at a minimum, an additional 412 new units could be
added to Centerville upon full build out of these areas based on the allowed
density ranges.
..................................................... ..... ......................................................
Future Land Use Net Densit.. Range Yield % Units'
Designation Acres Min Mid Max Minimum Midpoint
Low Density 24.50 3 4 5 1000/0 74 98
Residential
Medium Density 66.89 3 9 15 1000/0 201 602
Residential
. ......... ........................... ...................................................................
High Density8.06 12 18.5 25 1000/0 97 149
Residential
Central Business 13.75 12 21 30 250/6 41 72
District (CBD)/ (3.43
Mixed Use Res)
Total 102.8 413 921
1000/0 Net Density 4.02 8.96
Chapter 3 1 Page 8
9
Centerville 2040 Chapter 3: Land Use
Table 20 below shows the anticipated timing of growth in population and households
based on potential new units projected by the Metropolitan Council. As all remaining
developable areas are within the MUSA a multi-year staging plan is not necessary.
Anticipated forecasts for growth are illustrated in Table 20 to help gauge projected
timing. Development and redevelopment in the City will be dictated based on market
conditions in the region. Economic conditions and other factors may stall the pace of
development, as well. It is not intended that the anticipated growth represented in Table
20 be strictly applied. If the pace of development becomes accelerated, the City will
coordinate with the Metropolitan Council.
Population 2010 2020 2030 2040 Change 2010 —2040
Sewered 3,358 3,410 3,520 3,640 282
Unsewered 434 430 410 420 -14
..................................................................................................
Total Households
Sewered 1,161 1,250 1,300 1,350 189
Unsewered 154 150 150 150 -4
Employment
Sewered 403 530 550 580 177
Unsewered 6 10 10 10 4
In 2016, household size in Centerville was estimated at 2.92 persons per household
which is very close to the 2010 household size of 2.88 and 2000 household size of
2.97. In that same time Anoka County has seen steady reduction in persons per
household. In 2000 the household size was 2.77 persons. In 2010 the estimate was
2.70 and in 2016 the estimate was 2.69. Anoka County and the metropolitan region
are expected to see a continued decline in household size.
`TAGED DEVELOPMENT AND REDEVELOPMENT
The City is completely within the Metropolitan Urban Service Area (MUSA) and as a result
expansion of the MUSA is not necessary as it relates to staged development. Map 4-3
outlines the City's staged development plan for development and redevelopment.
The timelines depicted in Map 4-3 are for planning purposes only and market demands
may result in parcels developing earlier or later than currently anticipated. Acreages of
developed or redeveloped land in the identified planning periods are shown in Table 21
below.
Chapter 3 1 Page 9
10
Centerville 2040 Chapter 3: Land Use
Please refer to the City's local sewer plan for anticipated sewer flow based on anticipated
development phasing as well as potential impacts on local infrastructure for each 10-year
planning increment.
...................................................... ........................................ ................................
Future Land Net Expected Density Range Yield % Number of Units Based
Use Acres Residential on Midpoint Density
Designation Development
2018'- 2030 - Min Mid Max 2018— 2030 -
2030 2040 2030 2040
Low Density 24.50 24.50 0 3 4 5 100% 98 0
Residential
Medium 66.89 7.24 59.65 3 9 15 100% 65 537
Density
Residential
High Density 8.06 0 8.06 12 18.5 25 100% 0 149
Residential
Central 13.75 7.54 6.21 12 21 30 25% 39 33
Business (3.43 (1.89 (1.55
District (CBD) Res) Res) Res)
Mixed Use
...................................................... ........................................
Total (Res) 102.88 33.63 69.26 202 719
(Res) (Res) (Res)
100% 32.7% 67.3% Net Density 6.01 10.38
Chapter 3 Page 10
� off, ER R
cLEARWP�
W bd
�RSSPtE 35E 1SNib n SCO
N 3Sf 31tl1SN31N1 {y -
M Mglry ST TO NB REQ 3S£ OTTER LAKE SERVI CEIRD
lg NIyH,D 3111SN31NI 9N I++
1� 3SE 31tl15N31N1 950115 Nil IN M
Sed
s
b�1Nl SS
JAS
2�sT P
3Atl 1S LZ
9
rc
o '
3 s PN�WAV CDLTONWpD
I IL
_ yO NVi OAC 1�i�tlW115 i,
m f�
X
O $ �
SOLO MILL
d 3 RNEASANI l=N t
O Yf
F /r�
w y2
ay •�" N ON 553NOONd "* Y•. fy:..
I
Z t b h K
>'c
W W1 WEN'.
.s+
w
Irep,_
MD�ND ct
Y y
Q Y4
Centerville 2040 Chapter 3: Land Use
1 UTURE I.AND �JSE (..ATEG®RIES
The Future Land Use Plan identifies several categories to guide development and
redevelopment in the City. These generally include residential uses, commercial uses,
industrial uses, public and park uses, and undevelopable land such as right of way and
open water. The following are descriptions of these categories.
Residential Uses
A primary concern for the City regarding residential uses is to protect and enhance the
existing housing stock and to allow new residential developments that contain low,
medium and high density housing as appropriate. The residential areas currently served
by utilities consist primarily of low density single family detached housing. Existing
available land for residential development is either contiguous with areas presently served
by public utilities, or is within areas guided for redevelopment such as the Downtown
Area. It is assumed that public utilities will be extended to new residential development as
appropriate and in a contiguous manner.
The Future Land Use Plan (Map 3-2) includes four land use categories for residential uses:
low, medium, high density residential, and central business district/mixed use. These land
use categories are described below.
Low Density Residential: These areas are composed of detached, single-family homes.
The density will be a minimum of 3 units per acre and a maximum of 5 units per acre
without considering wetlands, right of way and other undevelopable land.
Medium Density Residential: These areas are composed of a mixture of detached and
attached single-family units. The density will range from a minimum of 3 units per acre to
15 units per acre. When developments take place through PUD or over larger land areas,
higher density portions should be concentrated near major transportation corridors or
neighboring areas of high-density development.
High Density Residential: These areas are composed of primarily attached units in multi-
story structures. The density will be a minimum of 12 units per acre and a maximum of 25
units per acre.
Central Business District/Mixed-Use: These areas are composed of both residential and
commercial uses, either in a horizontal or vertical mixture. The density will be a minimum
of 12 units per acre and a maximum of 30 units per acre with an anticipated minimum of
25% comprised of housing. The remaining 75% shall be a variety of commercial and office
Chapter 3 1 Page 12
13
Centerville 2040 Chapter 3: Land Use
space. These areas provide buildings that are close to the street, with a focus on providing
a pedestrian-friendly environment. The Downtown Master Plan contains detailed plans
and design guidelines for these areas.
The areas proposed for residential growth during the planning period include medium
density development in the southern portion of the City on what is currently some of the
last remaining agricultural land, low density development east of Mill Road and north of
Revoir Street, and high density and mixed-use development at various locations in the
City including the downtown redevelopment area.
Commercial Uses
The Future Land Use Plan identifies appropriate locations for commercial uses and future
development opportunities. There is one land use category for commercial development
(other than the CBD/Mixed Use category previously described). The City will encourage
clustering of commercial development, as opposed to strip developments, to minimize
highway access concerns, to strengthen the viability and marketability of co-located
services, and to minimize the impacts on the natural environment of the City.
The existing commercial areas will continue to develop in the City, with continued
expansion of the current commercial area west of CSAH 21 and County Road 54, north
and south of Main Street. The downtown area will also be a priority in terms of retaining
its vitality and importance as a focal point in the community. The City will continue to
implement the mixed-use concept developed in the Downtown Development Guidelines,
including restaurants, service uses and multifamily and senior housing. The City will also
evaluate the potential use of tax increment financing and other public assistance
programs to assist in implementing redevelopment opportunities.
Development standards will be established for new businesses and renovations.
Adequate lot sizes and structure setbacks will be required to provide safe and convenient
access and parking. Site buffering and landscaping criteria will also be required, as well as
revisions to the City's sign standards to provide for the installation of more attractive and
consistent signage throughout the City.
Industrial Uses
The Future Land Use Plan also identifies appropriate locations for industrial uses and future
industrial development opportunities in the City. There is one land use category for
industrial development. Industrial development will be in the eastern part of the City, east
of County Road 54 and south of CSAH 14. There are several existing businesses in the
industrial park, primarily related to manufacturing, building contracting, and transportation.
Chapter 3 1 Page 13
14
Centerville 2040 Chapter 3: Land Use
Centerville has an active Economic Development Commission which has completed the
Star City program. The Commission will examine the feasibility of establishing community
participation and financial incentives for economic development, such as tax increment
financing. Proximity to I-35E, land availability, public utilities and expanding labor markets
enhance the opportunities for development potential in the next 10-20 years. Financial
assistance, active marketing, and general development may be a prerequisite for maximum
opportunities.
The City currently has provisions within the existing zoning ordinance related to industrial
uses. These provisions will be reviewed to determine if changes are needed to more
effectively manage industrial development activities in the future. Adequate lot sizes and
structure setbacks will be required to provide safe and convenient access and parking. Site
buffering, landscaping and design criteria will also be evaluated.
{'AFFORDABLE f SOUSING
The Metropolitan Council considers any housing development more than eight units
per acre to qualify as affordable housing. Based on ThriveMSP 2040 allocations,
Centerville has a total affordable housing allocation of 14 units. Table 22 identifies
the area median income (AMI) distribution of that affordable housing allocation. The
high density residential and central business district/mixed use districts have a
minimum density of twelve units per acre which qualify as affordable housing as they
exceed the eight units per acre minimum.
Based on the City's development phasing plan (Map 4-3) it is anticipated that 7.54
acres of CBD/Mixed use land will develop by 2030. Land guided CBD/Mixed Use are
required to develop with a minimum 25% residential. Based on that residential
percentage, of the 7.54 acres of developed CBD/Mixed Use land, 1.89 acres will be
residential development. That will result in a midpoint of 39 affordable housing units
constructed by 2030 which exceeds the City's 2030 affordable housing allocation of
14 units.
Affordable Units by 2030
At or below 30% AMI 9
31 — 50% AMI 4
51 —80% AMI 1
Tota 1 14
Chapter 3 Page 14
15
Centerville 2040 Chapter 3: Land Use
)OWNTOWN N."'1ASTER PLAN P` I)EVELOPMENT t iUIDELINES
Beginning in the summer of 2005, and approved by the City Council in January of 2006,
the master plan includes a set of design guidelines and zoning amendments. The
Downtown Area Master Plan & Development Guidelines propose recommendations that
reinforce and guide public/private investment in a manner that will strengthen the viability
of the area. While the Master Plan may no longer be economically feasible, the form and
character of development within downtown will be required to adhere to the development
guidelines. The purpose of the Master Plan & Development Guidelines was to establish an
appropriate framework for future redevelopment of downtown as a vibrant Mixed-Use
destination, to incorporate:
• An overall vision for redevelopment of the area, including the pattern, form and
character of new development and open space in the interest of creating a
cohesive mixed-use downtown area.
• A framework of transportation improvements needed to support the
redevelopment of the area and to create appropriate levels of parking as well as
vehicular, bicycle and pedestrian access to the downtown.
• A set of design standards to guide the architectural quality of new development
within the downtown area.
The master plan was also coordinated with the plans for the redesign and expansion of
County State Aid Highway 14 (Main Street). The master plan integrated efforts to calm
traffic, provide a safe pedestrian environment and provide guidelines for buildings that
respected the pedestrian scale and encouraged walkability.
It is anticipated that following the adoption of the 2040 Comprehensive Plan that the City
will revisit the Downtown Master Plan to updated it based on market feasibility. While the
master plan will evolve the basis of the downtown vision as a mixed use development will
remain.
EMPLOYMENT
According to the Metropolitan Council, the City had 430 jobs in 2016. According to the
MN DEED Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages, most of the major employers in
Centerville can be classified as education and health services, leisure and hospitality,
construction and trade, or transportation and utility. Innovative Tools & Technologies, Inc,
North Metro Millwork, and John Hart, USA are examples of businesses in the City's existing
industrial park. Further employment opportunities are anticipated to include
manufacturing, service, and office positions.
Chapter 3 1 Page 15
16
Centerville 2040 Chapter 3: Land Use
Forecasting employment involves numerous criteria. The level of retail development may
follow the extent of residential activity. The amount of retail development in adjacent
communities will also impact the potential in Centerville. Industrial uses vary dramatically in
terms of jobs per acre or floor area. The size of the industrial area suggests that larger,
employment-intensive industries would be the exception in Centerville.
According to the Metropolitan Council local forecast, Employment is estimated to increase
from 430 to 590 jobs by the year 2040. This equates to 80 jobs for each ten year growth
stage. Currently the City has approximately 48 acres of land guided for commercial and 12
acres of land guided as industrial. Using the current employment figure, we can estimate
that Centerville has roughly 7.2 jobs per developed commercial or industrial acre. Between
2020 and 2040, Centerville hopes that the remaining 51 acres of land guided for
commercial and 67 acres of vacant land guided industrial will develop consistent with the
Future Land Use Plan. This would bring total acres of commercial land to 99 and industrial
land to 79. If the future commercial and industrial land develops with a similar jobs per
acre, Centerville could have approximately 1,280 jobs upon full build out.
PROTECTING °'SPECIAL RESOURCES
As required by state statute, a municipality's comprehensive plan must also include
strategies for protection of special resources, including solar access, historic preservation,
and aggregate. These strategies are discussed below.
Solar Access
Minnesota Statutes require an element for the protection and development of access to
direct sunlight for solar energy systems. The purpose of this legislation is to prevent solar
collectors from being shaded by adjacent structures or vegetation and to ensure that
development decisions do not preclude the possible future development and use of solar
energy systems. To ensure the availability of solar access, the City of Centerville will,
whenever possible, protect access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems on principle
structures. The City of Centerville will consider solar access in the review of site plans and
planning decisions.
Aagreaate Resources
Metropolitan Council requires that metropolitan area communities identify any regionally
significant aggregate resources to ensure proper planning for their use. Centerville does
not contain any regionally significant aggregate resources and therefore does not require
any special planning.
Chapter 3 1 Page 16
17
Centerville 2040 Chapter 3: Land Use
Historic Preservation
When an EAW was completed for Centerville's Downtown Redevelopment project, the
State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) was contacted to determine if there were any
historic sites or resources. The 106 Group also completed a survey of cultural resources for
the County Road 14 reconstruction project. While both inquiries returned the same 39
properties that were in SHPO's inventory, it was concluded that none of these properties
are eligible for listing on the National Historic Register.
Chapter 3 1 Page 17
18
Centerville 2040 Chapter 4: Housing
CHAPTER 4: HOUSING
NTRODUCTI®N
As a community nearing full development, Centerville is looking to the remaining large
pieces of vacant land as the last remaining sites for future residential subdivisions. Large,
contiguous parcels remain only in the southern portions of the community. As a result, the
City is taking a careful approach to planning land use and density to ensure adequate
amounts of land are guided to meet the City's life-cycle housing needs. Lifecycle housing
refers to the mix of housing types that meet the housing demands of individuals and
families throughout their lives, such as single family detached, town homes, condominiums,
apartments, and senior housing.
Centerville has a tremendous opportunity to meet this demand not only through the
remaining vacant land but within the downtown redevelopment plan/mixed use area
located along County Road 21 and Main Street. Housing goals established by the City
through the Comprehensive Plan update included the following:
• Provide a housing mixture that will allow for low, middle, and high income families
which does not discriminate against persons seeking housing based on age,
religion, race, ethnic origin, sexual preference, gender, or disability.
• Provide for the orderly development of safe and efficient housing opportunities in
the City.
• Maintain a level ofgrowth compatible with the available level ofpublic services.
• Provide non-motorized access to commercial properties and park amenities within
the city and surrounding areas.
• Promote and emphasize the small town atmosphere of the City.
• Plan densities and provide services for a sustainable population in excess of 51 000
people at full build-out.
• Increase housing densities to reach the population goal.
Housing policies reflect the position of the City on the specific implementation of the
Goals. It is the policy of the City of Centerville to:
Chapter 4 1 Page 1
19
Centerville 2040 Chapter 4: Housing
• Encourage the revitalization of the exlsting housing stock In the City as a source of
affordable housing which does not discriminate against persons seeking housing
based on age, religion, race, ethnic ongio, sexual preference, gender, or disability.
• Avoid adoption of regulations which create excessive obstacles to the development
of affordable housing.
• Protect residential neighborhoods from incompatible and offensive uses.
• Identify areas appropriate for multiple family and senior housing opportunities.
• Allow residential lot divisions only when adequate utilities are immediately available
and are consistent with public utility sequencing.
• Prohibit residential development without public utilities.
• Require the installation of sidewalks on at least one side of the street in new
neighborhoods where suggested by the City Engineer.
• Explore opportunities to install sidewalks in existing neighborhoods that lack them.
• Maintain standards for landscaping and screening to ensure adequate aesthetic
controls.
• Maintain adequate standards for site access, parking, and structure setbacks.
• Enforce standards for structure upkeep and site maintenance to ensure long-term
aesthetic controls.
• Revisit all established standards as appropriate.
The Metropolitan Council issues forecasts for population and household growth. In Table
23 below the Household Forecasts are displayed.
...................................................................... ............. ...................................
Actual Estimate Forecasts
1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2016 2020 2030 2040
Centerville 147 214 519 1,077 1,315 1,351 1,400 1,450 1,500
%change x 45.58% 142.52% 107.51% 22.10% 3.20% 3.17% 3.57% 3.45%
Anoka 39,668 60,716 82,437 106,428 121,227 128,135 136,860 155,300 171,930
County
%change x 53.06% 35.77% 29.10% 13.91% 5.70% 6.81% 13.47% 10.71%
Chapter 4 1 Page 2
20
Centerville 2040 Chapter 4: Housing
Source. 2010 US Census, *Metropolitan Council forecasts estimates.
Table 23 above shows that there are approximately 1,351 existing housing units in the City
according to the Metropolitan Council. In addition to the total amount of units it is
important to understand housing tenure and amount of owner and rental occupancy. Data
from the 2015 ACS finds that the community has an 87.9% owner-occupied and a 7.1%
rental occupied housing mix.
Each new household added to a city requires an additional housing unit and results in
increasing residential land uses. Between 2000 and 2016, Centerville had a slower
household growth rate than Anoka County as shown in Table 23 above. The city added
558 households in the 1990s. The Met Council forecast shows that Centerville will be
adding an additional 143 households between 2016 and 2040.
The City has identified and guided land to meet the Met Council forecasts shown in Table
24. However, the City has identified approximately 102 acres available for development or
redevelopment property that when fully developed will surpass the 2040 figures for
population and households. The private market will dictate when those lands are actually
developed.
Population 2010 2020 2030 2040 Change 2010 — 2040
.......................... ...:..................................... ..........................................................................
Sewered 3,3583,410 3,520 3,640 282
Unsewered 434 430 410 420 -14
Total Households
Sewered 1,161 1,250 1,300 1,350 189
Unsewered 154 150 150 150 -4
Employment
Sewered 403 530 550 580 177
Unsewered 6 10 10 10 4
The increase in households and ultimately population will be achieved by the development
of remaining vacant lands as well as including the approved downtown master plan into
the forecasts. Through the comprehensive planning process, areas of future residential
development were identified. The density for each residential land use type is as follows:
• Low density: 3 - 5 dwelling units/acre
• Medium density: 3 - 15 dwelling units/acre
...........................•....H.igh.Density..............1.2... 25.dwellin.g.units/acre.........
Chapter 4 1 Page 3
21
Centerville 2040 Chapter 4: Housing
• Mixed-Use: 12 - 30 dwelling units/acre
These land use categories and corresponding densities are included on the Future Land
Use Map 3-2. The result of this analysis is displayed on the map and table above. This
information was presented to the public and approved by the City Council during the
Comprehensive Plan update process.
The table demonstrates how the City can achieve a population over 5,000 at full
development by changing some land use categories to higher densities and redeveloping
the downtown area according to the downtown development guidelines. These changes
also help the City meet life-cycle housing goals by providing areas for medium and high-
density housing.
Building Permits
Permit data can give an accurate reflection of the amount and type of growth occurring in
a community over a longer time period. The number of permits issued during a particular
timeframe is also somewhat independent of land area consumed given different lot sizes
and density; therefore, it is useful for tracking growth in housing units, but not necessarily
changes in land use. TABLE 25 shows the number of building permits issued by type since
2010. There were no commercial building permits issued between 2010 and 2015.
TABLE 25—PERMITS ISSUED BY TYPE
Building Permit - Residential and Commercial
$3,500,000
$3,000,000
$2,500,000
$2,000,000
$1,500,000
$1,000,000
$500,000
$0
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Residential Commercial
The graph shows a steady increase in residential permits issued since the 2010, as the
economy recovered from the 2008 recession. The recent leveling off may be attributable to
the fact that Centerville is reaching full build-out. Table 26 below, showing estimated value
Chapter 4 1 Page 4
22
Centerville 2040 Chapter 4: Housing
of permits, shows a similar trend. Permit value increased sharply from 2010 to 2012, and
then leveled off in subsequent years.
TABLE 26— ESTIMATED VALUE OF PERMITS
Building Permit - Residential and Commercial
$3,500,000
$3,000,000
$2,500,000
$2,000,000
$1,500,000
$1,000,000
$500,000
$0 ...
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Residential Commercial
Household Income
Household incomes drives the level of consumer choice for housing and likewise has a
considerable effect on local housing demand. The following tables describe the income
levels of current households in Centerville. As SHOWN IN TABLE 27, 9 percent of households
in Centerville make less than $25,000 a year, 34 percent make between $25,000 and
$75,000, and 58 percent make more than $75,000 a year.
Income Households Percentage
Less than $10,000 6 0.50/0
$10,000 to $14,999 14 1.10/0
$15,000 to $24,999 85 6.5%°
$25,000 to $34,999 70 5.4%
$35,000 to $49,999 124 9.6%°
$50,000 to $74,999 246 19.00/0
$75,000 to $99,999 211 16.3%
$100,000 to $149,999 362 27.9%
$150,000 or more 178 13.7%
SOURCE: ACS 2012-2016 ESTIMATES
Chapter 4 1 Page 5
23
Centerville 2040 Chapter 4: Housing
As shown in TABLE 28, the median household income in Centerville is $63,696 which is 21.1
percent higher than the Anoka County median and 25.7 percent higher than the Twin
Cities Metropolitan Area median.
Income CentervilleAnoka %°of Twin Cities %of TC
County County MSA
Median $89,100 $73,600 121.1% $70,900 125.7%
income
SOURCE: ACS 2012-2016 ESTIMATES
The measure of affordability of a housing unit compares housing cost to gross household
income. The general standard is that housing is affordable if housing expenses equal 300/0
or less of a person's gross household income. TABLE 29 shows that 27 percent of
households in Centerville that own their home spent more than 30% of their income on
housing costs. A similar pattern occurs in rental housing. TABLE 30 shows that 51 percent
of households that rent their home spent more than 30% of their income on rent.
# Units Percent
< 20 percent 587 48%
20-24 percent 194 16%
25-29 percent 84 7%
30-34 percent 72 6%
35% or more 242 21%
Not computed _ 6 00/0
Tota l 1,179 1000/0
SOURCE: ACS 2012-2016 ESTIMATES
Chapter 4 1 Page 6
24
Centerville 2040 Chapter 4: Housing
..................................................................................................
# Units Percent
< 20 percent 7 6%
20-24 percent 16 14%
25-29 percent 31 28%
30-34 percent 16 14%
35% or more 41 37%
Not computed 0 00/0
Total ill 1000/0
SOURCE: ACS 2012-2016 ESTIMATES
Senior Housing
Centerville currently has one age-restricted housing development. Chauncy Barrett is a
senior housing development owned by Anoka County located on Centerville Road south of
Heritage Street. The first building in the complex was built in 1998 and consists of 16 units.
The second building consists of 31 units and was built in 2004. All units are age-restricted
and rental.
.........................................................................................................
Chapter 4 1 Page 7
25
o
Q
V V
(V fpfs�
��Lt7GD �� G�W:i�fl�L'D
�m
�m
rrm �
• I �
- ----- •
-- • • •
a
• j r FFff
ZY_ mJ
owrc wa 3
a��\ -o •
Iw •
- m
� b • i Wa
t W;
N
a1s`
w
t,,0 • moa -
�o • �¢o a
rc
z,� �
wIz
' a a
R N 00
• li �'= d d O 3 Z 00 LL
w¢ IE Z
I wJ ♦ 011 C L � `m�
CD
E
o
o E z
— w
y I
� I
o
�
�¢ • ���
3 W.i W
O
3
O
Q
Centerville 2040 Chapter 4: Housing
/A.FFORDABLE I IOUSING
Based on their analysis, the Metropolitan Council's new affordable housing goal for
Centerville is to create 14 new affordable housing units between 2021 and 2030. TABLE 31
describes the affordable housing need allocation by percentage of area median income
(AMI).
Need for units affordable to Need for units affordable to Need for units affordable to
households with income at households with income households with 51% to
or below 30%AMI 31% to 50% AMI 80% AMI
9 4 1
The Metropolitan Council considers any housing development more than eight
units per acre to qualify as affordable housing. Based on ThriveMSP 2040
allocations, Centerville has a total affordable housing allocation of 14 units. Table
22 identifies the area median income (AMI) distribution of that affordable housing
allocation. The high density residential and central business district/mixed use
districts have a minimum density of twelve units per acre which qualify as
affordable housing as they exceed the eight units per acre minimum.
Based on the City's development phasing plan (Map 4-3) it is anticipated that 7.54
acres of CBD/Mixed use land will develop by 2030. Land guided CBD/Mixed Use
are required to develop with a minimum 25% residential. Based on that residential
percentage, of the 7.54 acres of developed CBD/Mixed Use land, 1.89 acres will
be residential development. That will result in a midpoint of 39 affordable housing
units constructed by 2030 which exceeds the City's 2030 affordable housing
allocation of 14 units.
While the City is doing their part in creating a regulatory land use plan to plan for
areas of density greater than 3-15 du/acre for medium, 12-30 du/acre for mixed
use and 12-25 du/acre for high density units where most affordable housing will
occur. Barriers to development of affordable housing still exist in the region as well
as in Centerville. Some of these barriers are beyond the City's control including:
0 Steady increases in land prices.
.........................................................................................................
Chapter 4 1 Page 9
27
Centerville 2040 Chapter 4: Housing
• Increase in construction costs. When combined with land prices, it becomes
more difficult to provide affordable units through new construction.
• Physical limitations of land due to wetlands, poor access, poor soils that
would increase the cost of land development or construction thus making it
more difficult to build affordable units.
• Limited amount of remaining developable land.
• State, county and local tax structures.
• Availability of regional public transit options within the City.
There are some significant barriers to construction of new affordable housing including the
few named above. It is important that cities help in the effort to provide affordable
housing. To assist in this effort, Centerville can use its regulatory tools, including
implementing land use and zoning regulations that do not impede the construction of
affordable housing. Many of these tools can help developers by reducing setback and
open space requirements, increasing density, or reducing fees all in the effort to support
construction of affordable housing.
The following Housing Action Plan outlines efforts Centerville will explore to maintain
existing affordable housing and create new affordable housing in the next ten years. The
items are listed by category, including regulatory, financial and other.
Chapter 4 1 Page 10
28
0
(JaHIC)'dVD:)V)sloafoid
x
SuisnOH o!lqnd lioddnS
(sVIH)
Se@JVIU@W@Aoidwl guisnOH x x
AO@lejjs
Buisnoq aj!s-p9jaj4eos x x
Sa!ljadoidD-LHII x x
dj2 paleplosuoO Aoua2V x x x
aDueu!j DuisnOH elOs9uu!N
(lp u no:)IaW) x x x
juejO sail!unwwoD @IqeA!l
.......................................................................................
sanbtupal Alqw@ssV al!S x x x
uo!lLlngaj OuiuoZ x x x x x
(jeqlo juawd0l@A@Cl
Al!unwwo:)Aluno:)ejouV x x x
.......................................................................................
(sj!u n
elqepjojje'aouels!ssL A2jaua
'aouelsisse jaAnqawOH) x x
di
HsJaulJed uORDV
Al!u n w woD Alu noD ejo uV
weigoid juawaojolua x x 0')
apoD pue suoipadsui 9upIng C4
(j@qlo'Al!uewnH
joj jej!qeH-a-!)sweiSoid x x
1!lojd-uou ql!m J9ulJed
siad0l@A@p 2uisnoq
x
apepiolle Hl!m J9ulJed
.......................................................................................
UD!IU9Aejd
ainsolo@joj pue'swei2oid x
aouels!sse j@Anq@wOH
SILJJGja8 aA!lJoddnS aA!jDaJ13 x x
@DUL.U!j IU@W@JDUI xei x x x x
spuog guisnOH x
(bat)
s@!I!joqlnv juawd0l@A@Cl x x x
ID
E
76
E
iff
E
0 U 1 0) 0
u uu
C�
E
E
P
0 (D
u,
c)) 0) -2 0 -0 Iz
C� 0 , " E. M
0 0 a
t
E
E
0 0
>
Centerville 2040 Chapter 4: Housing
............................................................................................
Economic Development Authority and EconomicDevelopment Committee (EDA
and EDC) Centerville's newly established Economic Development Authority may
elect to support or `,get involved in development projects, and will consider
supporting those affordable' housing projects that exemplify the housing goals
enumerated in this plan. Although the Anoka County', HRA does not currently
operate'projects within the City, Centerville should continue to partner with the
County HRA on projects and program opportunities as they become available;'
Housing Bonds HRAs can issue bonds that help to develop and administer
affordable housing developments or programs. Cities may make or purchase loans
using the proceeds of the bond sales for activities such as new construction,
acquisition and rehabilitation, or refinancing bond debt. There are specific
affordable unit thresholds that must be met in bond-financed projects. Bond
supported projects would typically support affordable housing for the 50% and
80%AMI bands.
Tax Increment'Financing Centerville may create'a tax increment financing (TIF)
district with the TIF bonds issued on this district used to support the construction
of affordable housing. All property taxes received above the original tax value
from the development is used to finance these bonds. Centerville has discretion
Local funding over TIF allocations.'The City will consider using affordable housing TIF for
for Affordable projects that include not only a significant`,percentage of affordable units but also
Housing provide'a substantial ',public 'benefit (including but not limited to: environmental
remediation, enhanced walkable urban design, open space or park land, provision
of green space, stormwater infiltration, and/or improved streetscape design)', and
would not happen "'but for" TIF assistance. TIF supported affordable housing
projects' will help to reduce the City's', housing cost burden. By legislative
definition, TIF that is used for affordable rental housing projects >'must meet
provide affordability to those at 60% of AMI or less. The affordability threshold is
115%of AMI for owner occupied housing projects.
Effective referrals The City supports providing appropriate resources and
education for existing housing support programs offered by other agencies and
organizations. While the city does not have the capacity to provide a full-time
staff to offer this service, there are opportunities to more effectively
communicate to residents and prospective residents about existing programs
offered through Anoka County community action partnership, Habitat for
Humanity, Center for Energy and the Environment, Anoka County HRA, and
beyond. Effective housing referrals will increase opportunities for residents to
enter the community whom would otherwise have barriers, and improve the
likelihood of existing housing maintenance. Housing programs support residents
at a range of income levels, from very low up to moderate incomes, depending on
..the program,...................
Chapter 4 1 Page 12
30
Centerville 2040 Chapter 4: Housing
First time homebuyer, down paymentassistance, and foreclosure prevention''
programs The City ,'encourages residents to access existing' programs available''
through Anoka County Community Action Partnership, as well as the Minnesota''
Homeownership Center and the'StartUlp program through 'Minnesota Housing.'
The City will continue to form partnerships with external organizations who offer''
these 'programs and seek to provide referral information' wherever possible.''
These;programs will be especially valuable to households at or below 80% AMI''
that would otherwise face extreme hardships in purchasing or maintaining aj,'
home.
Partner with affordable housing developers. When feasible, Centerville will work '
with affordable housing developers who provide low-to-moderate income
housing opportunities through housing development or redevelopment. The City
will encourage an affordable housing component in residential redevelopment
projects where site conditions and financing allow.
Partner with non-profit programs. When feasible, the City will work''
collaboratively with non-profits that offer housing programs, such as Habitat for
Humanity and others, and make effective referrals to these programs.
Building inspections and code enforcement programs. Centerville already offers
building inspections and enforcement programs. These programs help to ensure
that properties are well-maintained. The City intends to continue these programs,
which will help Centerville achieve its housing maintenance goals.
Anoka County Community Action Partnership ACCAP offers a variety of programs
and services' to the Centerville' community that help to achieve the City'sj,'
affordable housing 'goals. ACCAP manages affordable rental properties,j,offers''
housing rehabilitation and weatherization funding, home ownership education''
and foreclosure prevention counseling, and crisis ' funding. Many of these''
programs are targeted to low-to-moderate income households. Centerville will
continue to make appropriate referrals to ACCAP and work with this organization''
to help achieve the City's affordable Housing goals.
Anoka County Community Development Anoka County Community Development
offers assistance programs, including CDBG and HOME funds, when funding is
available that support housing rehabilitation and affordable housing projects.
Centerville will continue to work with the County HRA when appropriate and
funding, programs and opportunities become available.
Zoning regulation Centerville will 'continue to monitor its zoning and subd'ivision''
ordinances to make certain that its regulatory policies align with its housing goals''
and aspirations as outlined in this Plan. Zoning lregulation should be in alignment''
with and support the City's'housing goals.
Site assembly and/or acquisition The City will consider policies and participation in
programs or opportunities that encourage reserving publicly owned properties,
and other site assembly techniques for affordable housing.
Chapter 4 1 Page 13
31
Centerville 2040 Chapter 4: Housing
Livable Communities Demonstration Account (LCDA) Centervilleis eligible for Met
Council 'funding for developments within the community that will innovative
projects'often involving affordable and connected housing. The City will continue
to work with developers in coordination with the Met Council'in supporting RFP
submissions for projects that will bring a; significant number of new affordable
units, and will urge more support for projects that meet affordability thresholds of
Regional &' 510°% AMI or below as'a reflection of the city's greatest cost-burdened need. The
Federal funding City is especially supportive of use of this grant opportunity to develop projects
for Affordable with a strong transit-oriented development orientation.
Dousing MHFA Consolidated Request for Proposals This major annual funding request from
Minnesota Housing Finance Agency supports affordable housing development.
The City will continue to work with developers in coordination with MHFA in
supporting RFP submissions for projects that will bring a significant number of
new affordable units, and will urge more support for projects that meet
affordability thresholds of 50% AMI or below as a reflection of the city's greatest
cost-burdened need.
Low Income Housing Tax Credit Properties (LIHTC) With LIHTC; developers apply
for tax credits to offset costs at the time of development. Although the City ldoes
not fund this type of assistance, Centerville will consider stating its intent of
support for developers who pursue LIHTC and who intend to seek ways to retain
the affordability of the LIHTC property after the terms of LIHTC are up.1,
Scattered site housing opportunities Scattered site housing creates affordable
units throughout a neighborhood, instead of concentrating them in one area.
Centerville can work with the Anoka County HRA to facilitate the creation of such
Affordable', units.
Dousing Housing, Improvement Areas (HIAs)' HIAs are a defined' area in a city in which
h'ousingj, improvements in 'condominium or townhome complexes may be
Preservation financed with the assistance of the city (EDA HRA).' An active development
Strategies ' authority would have the opportunity to designate an HIA lin an area where
existing housing needs improvement for retention of housing affordability is at
risk.
Public and/or subsidized housing When feasible, Centerville will work
collaboratively with entities that offer subsidized housing opportunities to very
low-income residents. Housing subsidies are one of the only means by which to
offer housing support to very low-income individuals and families, and Centerville
recognizes this is an effective housing tool for very low-income, high-barrier and
highly cost-burdened households.
Chapter 4 1 Page 14
32
Centerville 2040 Chapter 6: Transportation
CHAPTER 6: TRANSPORTATION
CITY t IOALS AND 'STRATEGIES
It is the goal of the City of Centerville to:
• Malntaln a safe, efc%nt and convenient multi-modal transportation
system.
• Protect the integrity of the transportation system.
• Provide sufficient off-street parking.
Policies reflect the position of the City on the specific implementation of the
Goals. It is the policy of the City of Centerville to:
• Develop land use development standards that promote safe and
efficient access to the transportation system.
• Develop land uses and access spacing guidelines compatible with the
functional classification of the regional highway system.
• Establish a local transportation network which preserves
neighborhood identity while linking together neighborhoods,
community parks and facilities.
• Identify long term transportation corridors to provide access to and
within the City as development occurs.
• Identify potential trail corridors for long term linkage to
neighborhoods, public parks and businesses and construct those trails
as funding allows.
• Coordinate transportation planning and system improvements with
surrounding communities as well as Anoka County and the Minnesota
Department of Transportation.
• Work with the Metro Transit to maximize transit opportunities for the
community.
`SUMMARY OF REGIONAL `STRATEGIES
This Plan has been prepared to be consistent with the regional transportation
....strategi.es..outlined..i.n..the..Metropolitan..Council.2.040..Tra.nsportation..Policy.......
Chapter 6 Page 1
33
Centerville 2040 Chapter 6: Transportation
Plan (TPP). Similar to this Plan, the TPP evaluates the existing transportation
system, identifies transportation challenges to the region, and sets regional
goals, objectives, and priorities to meet the transportation needs of current
residents while accommodating the region's anticipated growth. The TPP also
guides local agencies in coordinating land use and transportation and
establishes regional performance measures and targets.
The TPP is guided by the following goals:
• Transportation system stewardship: Sustainable investments in the
transportation system are protected by strategically preserving,
maintaining, and operating system assets.
• Safety and Security: The regional transportation system is safe and secure
for all users.
• Access to Destinations: People and businesses prosper by using a reliable,
affordable, and efficient multimodal transportation system that connects
them to destinations throughout the region and beyond.
• Competitive Economy: The regional transportation system supports the
economic competitiveness, vitality, and prosperity of the region and State.
• Healthy Environment: The regional transportation system advances equity
and contributes to communities' livability and sustainability while
protecting the natural, cultural, and developed environments.
• Leveraging Transportation Investment to Guide Land Use: The region
leverages transportation investments to guide land use and development
patterns that advance the regional vision of stewardship, prosperity,
livability, equity, and sustainability.
Funding is a key constraint that is acknowledged in the TPP. Current
transportation revenue will not meet the region's transportation needs
through 2040. As a result, the TPP includes two long-term investment
scenarios: a fiscally-constrained scenario that identifies projects anticipated to
be funded based on current revenue projections, and an increased revenue
scenario that identifies project priorities should additional transportation
funding become available.
Under the current revenue scenario, the TPP is focused on operations and
maintenance of the existing transportation system. Investments in highway
mobility and access are limited to those projects that address multiple TPP
Chapter 6 1 Page 2
34
Centerville 2040 Chapter 6: Transportation
goals and objectives. The increased revenue scenario would allow additional
investments in operations and maintenance, as well as regional mobility,
access, safety, and bicycle/pedestrian improvements. However, congestion
cannot be greatly reduced under even the increased revenue scenario. Under
both scenarios, proposed investments are focused on areas of the metro with
the greatest existing and future challenges and anticipated growth.
The Metropolitan Council classifies Centerville under the Emerging Suburban
Edge Community Designation. Based on /�r%� ,t�� 5: r't Emerging
Suburban Edge areas are expected to plan for forecasted population and
household growth at average densities of at least three to five units per acre
for new development and redevelopment. These communities are also
expected to target opportunities for more intensive development near
regional transit investments when available.
I-'®ADWAY "-,YSTEM I UNCTI®NAL (''LASS I-"OADWAYS
The functional classification system groups roadways into classes based on
roadway function and purpose. Functional classification is based on both
transportation and land use characteristics, including roadway speeds, access
to adjacent land, connection to important land uses, and the length of trips
taken on the roadway.
Four classes of roadways are included in the seven-county metropolitan area
functional classification system: principal arterials, minor arterials, collector
streets, and local streets. Map 6-1 shows the existing and planned functional
classification of each road in the City of Centerville. The following sections
describe each functional class in greater detail and indicate which roadways
fall into each classification.
Minor Arterials
Minor arterials maintain a focus on mobility, but provide more land access
than principal arterials. Minor arterials are intended to serve trips of four to
eight miles in length. Within developing areas of the metro, these facilities are
spaced between one and two miles apart. Minor arterials connect cities and
towns within the region and link to regional business and commercial
concentrations. Access points along minor arterials are generally at-grade
....and.ty.pi.cally.co.ntroll.ed.with.signals.or.stop.signs...........................................
Chapter 6 1 Page 3
35
Centerville 2040 Chapter 6: Transportation
During peak traffic, minor arterials in developing areas are intended to
maintain 30 mph average speeds. As a result, transportation system
connections are limited to interstate freeways, other principal arterials, other
minor arterials, collectors, and some local streets. Land access is limited to
concentrations of commercial and industrial land uses. The Metropolitan
Council has established a system of "A" Minor and "B" Minor arterials. "A"
Minor arterials are eligible for federal funding administered by the
Metropolitan Council.
The Metropolitan Council has further split "A" Minor arterials into four types,
described below:
• Relievers: Arterials located parallel to congested principal arterials. The
purpose of "A" Minor Relievers is to provide additional capacity in
congested corridors.
• Augmenters: Arterials that supplement the principal arterials system
within urban centers and urban communities.
• Expanders: Arterials that supplement principal arterials in less-densely
developed areas of the metro area.
• Connectors: Arterials that provide connections between rural towns
and connect rural areas with the principal arterial system.
A Functional Classification Map of the City's Road and Highway System is
included as Map 6-1. Interstate 35E (a principal arterial) is located just east of
the City limits. A full interchange with Anoka County State Aid Highway 14
(CSAH 14) provides interstate access to the City.
Running east-west through the downtown area, CSAH 14 is the City's most
used "A-Minor Arterial". The A-minor designation is further defined for this
roadway as an "Expander". CSAH 14 is currently and planned to remain a
three-lane roadway. The city's only other A-minor arterial is CSAH 54 which is
currently and planned to remain a two-lane roadway running north-south
along the City's eastern edge. It is considered an A-minor Reliever for its role
as a frontage road to 35E. Both A-minor arterials are under county
jurisdiction. The county also has a B-minor Arterial; CSAH 21 running north-
south along the City's western edge and leading into the downtown where it
terminates at CSAH 14.
Chapter 6 I Page 4
36
o
0
Q —
Q
� V
Q
m
V
C, g
�m�mmm�
�m
r - — — g g
GuaL nJ)10VVVH OLL I
(ObOZ)1OV009'8 (aueLnV)10VVJHOLL ��e]]
(ObOZ)lOV 008'S L'S
(,no)1OV00b'E (luaLn3)jGV00Z910
CS
I rcws o� i
� MOM
u 8 g c m�
a o + m
ISI i uo
e wIIR,=—L�7i . Q o a
mo
® �
'fuG,LLLSJJ�"' I m
g WE�3�7 g II
�� (]ueyn�)lOVOSO'b
[p�
2-,
I c7 �o moa II
aa0W.
wa
o-z J
� I I iN
V
� i FO
V � a K
J
I NN
Cr y V y y D U Z ill
O—N -
N N —
Qw Z
� N C
�
V wa mmy
-.7
V a N ID
I E m° � v 0
0 §~
U �u z�
ID
� I �
01 bbb
II
� I I
o I
Q rc rc
z
o wY m a
call
OQQ
Q �3
Centerville 2040 Chapter 6: Transportation
Major and Minor Collectors
Major and minor collector roadways provide linkages to larger developments
and community amenities. They generally do not link communities to one
another. Collector roadways generally favor access to the system over
mobility, but try to balance the two competing needs. Collector roadways are
generally lower speed than the principal or minor arterial routes. Collector
roadways are often owned and operated by cities, although counties operate
some of these facilities. Within Centerville, seven collector roadways are
owned and operated by the city. Collectors are intended to serve trips of one
to four miles in length. Collectors link minor arterials, other collectors, and
local streets.
Major collectors typically serve higher density residential areas and
concentrations of commercial and industrial land uses. These facilities tend to
serve longer trips than minor collectors. Major collectors within the city include
the following:
• Peltier Lake Drive
• Mill Road'
• Old Mill Road
• Brian Drive
• Dupre Road
• 21St Avenue North
There are no minor collectors within the city, and the 2040' Transportation
Policy Plan does'not propose any additional collector roadways within the city.
The City has planned a network of local collector roads. These existing and
proposed roads are shown, schematically, on Map 6-1.
Local Roadways
The primary function of local roadways is land access. Local roadways connect
individual land parcels with other local roadways and collectors. Trips on local
roadways are typically under two miles. Speeds on local roadways are typically
low. Longer trips are facilitated by local roadway connections to the collector
and arterial systems. Local roadways are under the jurisdiction of the City of
Centerville. Local roadways are all roadways that are not arterials or collectors.
Chapter 6 1 Page 6
38
Centerville 2040 Chapter 6: Transportation
Planned Functional Classification
Other than new proposed roadways shown schematically, no functional
classification changes are currently recommended in the city.
ACCESS MANAGEMENT
The City understands that access management for state and county roadways
is under their respective jurisdictions. Both MNDOT and Anoka County have
their own access management policies applicable to each of their roadway
systems, respectively. The City maintains its own policies on access to its local
roadway network. These policies are similar to those of the Anoka County
and the State of Minnesota but are more appropriately formed for a local
municipal roadway system.
Anoka County has established access management guidelines for County
roadways, as displayed in Table 6-1.
.. .......
Table: .Ar 'kia cid . :A6ce.s :S. circ :Guid lin.es..:Intersection cin
Roadway Route Full Conditional Signal Private
Type;, SpeedMovement Secondary Spacing Access
(miles ' Intersection Intersection
per hour)
Principal 50 - 55 1 mi. 1/2 mi. 1 mi. Subject to
Arterial 40 -45 1/2 mi. 1/4 mi. 1/2 mi. conditions
<40 1/8 mi. 300 — 660 1/4 mi for all
ft roadway
Minor 50 - 55 1/2 mi. 1/4 mi. 1/2 mi. types and
Arterial 40 -45 1/4 mi. 1/8 mi. 1/4 mi. speeds.
<40 1/8 mi. 300 — 660 1/4 mi.
ft
Collector 50 - 55 1/2 mi. 1/4 mi. 1/2 mi.
and Local 40 -45 1/8 mi. NA 1/4 mi.
< 40 1/8 mi. 300 — 660 1/8 mi
ft
RAFFIC 'ALLOCATION
Forecasted 2040 volumes for A minor Arterials were taken from Anoka
County's volume projections for their roadway system.
Chapter 6 1 Page 7
39
Centerville 2040 Chapter 6: Transportation
PLANNED IMPROVEMENTS TO I'EGI®NAL I (IGHWAY SYSTEM
None of the planned improvements to the metropolitan highway system listed
in the Transportation Policy Plan directly affect the City of Centerville.
In the fall of 2007, CSAH 14 began reconstruction. The roadway was
reconstructed over a 3-year period from I-35W to I-35E. The improvements
included the addition of a center turn lane throughout the downtown area.
Additionally, a median restricts access at several locations on the east end of
the City. In response to this, the City planned and constructed a "Backage
Road" to connect 21" Ave. with 20th Ave., allowing better access to local
businesses and a way for locals to move throughout town without having to
make U-turns.
The City anticipates a similar style reconstruction of CSAH 21 in the three
block area of downtown. This project will likely be initiated by the City through
its downtown redevelopment plan.
The City has a number of planned improvements to its local collector road
system. Those improvements are shown on Map 6-1. These improvements
will be made as development occurs.
Improvement Description Sta e
Connection between Land Use and Transportation
The City recognizes the connection between land use, natural resource
protection and transportation planning. City policies guide land use to be
compatible with both existing natural resources as well as local and regional
transportation facilities.
The City's downtown redevelopment will be served by the newly
reconstructed/expanded CSAH 14 and the future reconstruction of CSAH 21.
Additionally, the guiding of property on the south side of Main Street (CSAH
Chapter 6 1 Page 8
40
Centerville 2040 Chapter 6: Transportation
14) between Progress Road and City Hall from low density residential to mixed
use development will capitalize on the anticipated increase in average daily
traffic as well as move single family residential away from a highly trafficked
roadway.
The City has not conducted any recent corridor studies regarding roadway
improvements.
Need to Expand Facilities
The City will experience growth in two major areas. The first is in the small
sections of undeveloped land within the City. These development areas do not
represent large enough amounts of potential traffic to tax the local and
regional transportation systems. The City also plans to redevelop its
downtown area. This redevelopment proposal was large enough to trigger an
Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW). The conclusion of the EAW, with
regard to transportation issues, was that the local and regional roadway
system could handle the increased densities in the downtown area with minor
modifications in the immediate area, such as the addition of turn lanes, etc. It
also concluded that the redevelopment was not the primary cause of the need
for these improvements, but rather that it was regional growth.
Growth projections are in line with those shown in the System Statement.
Potential Safet Isy sues
The City does not anticipate any specific safety issues within its jurisdictional
roadway system as a result of growth. Policies regarding access management,
geometric design and signage enforced by the City on its existing and
planned roadways help maintain a safe local transportation system. Where
applicable access management guidelines have been incorporated into the
City's subdivision and zoning ordinances.
A number of sidewalk and trail projects are in the planning or construction
phase in an effort to increase pedestrian safety. A curb and trail along the
east side of Mill Road will allow separation of pedestrians from this higher
volume 'local roadway. Improvements in the Downtown area are slated to
meet the same goal.
Chapter 6 1 Page 9
41
Centerville 2040 Chapter 6: Transportation
The City has applied for funding through the Safe Routes to School program
for the installation of agrade'-separated pedestrian crossing of CSAH 14 near
Clearwater Creek.
1 RAFFIC a;°NALYSIS TONES
The City of Centerville is separated between four different TAZ zones.
Population, household, and employment forecasts (see Table 20 in the Land
Use Chapter) are allocated by their respective TAZ's. While Centerville is split
amongst four (4) TAZ areas, one of the areas, TAZ 167 is comprised entirely of
regional park space and thus does not have any projected households,
population, or employment figures to be included. The City has allocated
growth based on distribution of desired land use as well as existing and
planned infrastructure. Those allocations are shown in Table 34 below which
are consistent with the projections of the Metropolitan Council.
Ta bi6:34::Hbu'seholdd 'PbOUl tibn.,:6nd.Em.'01byrr b'h .Forecasts:by. TAZ:.......:i
TAZ.161:.......:.......................:.......:..,
2010 2020 2030' 2040
Households 684 722 735 741
Population 1974 1979 1990 2003
Employment 165 126 138 156
TAZ.16q:.......:................................i
2010 2020 2030' 2040
Households 478 514 544 579
Population 1361 1412 1476 1572
Employment 239 388 395 406
...::.......:.......:.......:.......:.....TAZ 166:.......:.......:.......:.......:.......:
2010 2020 2030 2040
Households 153 164 171 179
Population 1361 1412 1476 1572
Employment 5 26 26 28
BIKE AND PEDESTRIAN PLAN
The Metropolitan Council 2040 TPP encourages the use of bicycles as a mode
of transportation and establishes a Regional Bicycle Transportation Network
(RBTN) to establish an integrated network of on-street bikeways and off-road
.. trails..th.at..complement each other to improve conditions. for..bicycle
Chapter 6 I Page 10
42
Centerville 2040 Chapter 6: Transportation
transportation at the regional level. The RBTN identifies Tier 1 and Tier 2
alignments where existing regional or other trails exist or where a specific
alignment has been identified. The RBTN also identifies Tier 1 and Tier 2
corridors where specific alignments have not yet been defined.
The City maintains policies which support the design of safe and efficient trails
throughout the City along existing and developing roadways as well as
through off-road corridors. A map of the City's existing and proposed trails is
shown in Map 5-1. More detailed goals and policies regarding trails can be
found in Chapter 5 which is the parks and trails chapter of this plan. Map 5-1
also depicts the Regional Bicycle Transportation Network (RBTN) within the
City and its relationship with the local network of trails and sidewalks. A Tier 2
RBTN alignment aligns with CSAH 14 at the northern boundary of the City and
extends along CSAH 14 to the eastern boundary of the City. Also, a Tier 2
RBTN runs along CSAH 21 from the southern boundary of the City to CSAH
14. The City does not contain a regional employment cluster or activity center
node.
The planned redevelopment of the downtown area will have a distinct
pedestrian friendly feel, accomplished through streetscaping elements such as
boulevard trees, decorative concrete sidewalks and intersection treatments,
on-street parking, decorative pedestrian lighting and other landscape
amenities.
A network of trails will allow bicycle access to the downtown while providing
viable bypass routes for those on more regional trips through the area. No
planned regional or local trails require connections over major physical
barriers such as freeways, railroad corridors, rivers or streams
Bicycles and pedestrians can access the regional transit network by accessing
the park and ride facility at Main Street (CSAH 14) and 21St Street which serves
as a stop for Route 275. Trails that provide pedestrian and bicycle access to
this facility include the regional trail along CSAH 14 as well as planned city
trails through downtown and sidewalks along CSAH 21.
`SPECIAL -�ITUATI®NS
At this time the City is not involved in any right-of-way preservation projects
....o.r.corridor..studies................................................................................
Chapter 6 1 Page 11
43
Centerville 2040 Chapter 6: Transportation
1 RAN SIT PLAN
Centerville is located in transit market area IV. Centerville currently has limited
transit service, with the Route 275 bus running on weekdays during the AM
and PM rush hours. This service runs on roughly 30 minute intervals with
service beginning at 6:00 am and ending at 7:40 am for AM rush hour and
drop-off between 4:18 and 5:50 for PM rush hour. Route 275 runs between
Centerville and downtown Saint Paul, where riders can transfer to other
routes.
Centerville has one park and ride location at Main Street (CSAH 14) and 21"
Avenue N. The location of this facility is shown on the Transportation Plan
Map (Map 6-1). Centerville also has public dial-a-ride service provided by
Anoka County Traveler and Anoka County Volunteer.
AVIATI®N FLAN
Centerville is not within any influence area of an airport within the regional
airspace system. The closest airport is Anoka County-Janes Field in Blaine,
approximately nine miles west of the City. Centerville is identified by the
Metropolitan Council as a City potentially impacted by seaplane base activity.
The City will cooperate with the Minnesota Department of Transportation
regarding activities that may have potential impact on seaplane operations.
The City regulates the construction of objects affecting navigable airspace as
well as structures and activities which have the potential to cause electronic
interference. The City will notify the Federal Aviation Agency of any proposed
structures exceeding 200 feet.
1 REIGHT
There are no rail lines, barge facilities or intermodal freight terminals with the
City of Centerville. The City does have land guided for commercial and
industrial land in the southeastern portion of the City that once developed is
anticipated to generate increased commercial traffic. This traffic will travel
along 21St Avenue North to CSAH 14 to connect to Interstate 35E. There are
presently no issues related to insufficient height, width, or turning radii along
that route that would inhibit commercial traffic. Map 6-1 provides current
heave commercial average annual daily traffic (HCAADT) estimates.
Chapter 6 1 Page 12
44
Centerville 2040 Chapter 6: Transportation
.........................................................................................................
Chapter 6 1 Page 13
45
CITY OF CENTERVILLE 04106118 4R 1 PM
Check Detail -April 11, 2018 Page I
Check
e 11
...... ....xx....Ill........ .... xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ......xxC.QOHMN Q, .. .. .. .. .. .. .....
14/6/2018 001161E OPIUM BANK-H,.S.A. H.S.A,W/H-PAY PERIOD 7 $1,290, -
Check Nbr 001161 OPTUM BANK-H.S.A. $1,209x00
14/6/2018 001162E IRS/E S FICAIMED 1N/H-PAY PERIOD 7 $3,611.45
14/6/2018 001162E IRS/EFTPS FED €/H-PAY PERIOD 2,14 x 2
Check Nbr 001162IRS/EFTPS $6,002,21
14/6/2018 0101163E REBA PENA YOU-PAS'PERIOD 7 $3,0611,64
Check Nbr 001163 PERA
$3,065&64
14/6/2018 001164E MINNESOTA DEPT OF REVENUE STATE AVH.-PAS'PERIOD 7 51,016,53
Check Nbr 001164 MINNESOTA DEPT OF RE ENUE $1,056:53
14/6/2018 061165E MINNESOTA DEPT OF REVENUE IST QTR 2018-WXTER SALE T` $211.010
14/61201.8 001165E MINNESOTA DEPT OF REVENUE SALES TAX ON MAU-METER READ EQUIPMENT $19.00
Check Nbr 001.165 MINNESOTA DEPT OF REVENUE $250.00
14/6/2018 001166E TAASC FSA-PA's PERIOD 7 $250.32
...
Cheek Nbr 001166 T '25832
14/11/2018 031751 ALLSTREAM 2065 1N CEDAR -PHONE SERVICES THRU 5..22..16 060.43
Cheek Nbr 031751 AL EAM $88.43.
14,111/2018 0131752 AMUNDSEN, KEVIN P R R MEETINGS-1x3 A 2x7-18 $100.00
Check Nbr 0131752 AMUNDSEN, KEVIN $100,00
14/11/2018 0131753 ANOKA COUNTY PROPERTY RECORDS 2195119.1101 -70120 BRIAN CT $46,00
....
Check Nbr 031753 ANOKA COUNTY PROPERTY RECORDS $46,010
14111/2018 031754 ANOIKA COUNTY TREASURY MAY 2018 BROADBAND $37.50
14111/2018 031.754 ANOKA COUNTY TREASURY MAY 2018 BROADBAND $37.50
14,111/2018 031754 ANO}KA COUNTY TREASURY MAY 2018 BROADBAND 5x0; 51=
Check Nbr 031754 ANOKA COUNTY SUR', 1t.
14/11/2018 031755 BENDER,TERESA REIMBURSE FOUR ACHIEVEMENT FRAMES $1134
141111/2018 0317.55 BENDER,TERESA MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT-MCFOA CODE °15
Check Nb,031755 BENDER,TERESA
1. 4/1.1/2018 031756 B NCER,CHRISTOPHER P A,R MEETINGS 1-3 R 3-21-18 $100,00
Check Nbr 031256 RETTIN0IER,CHRISTOPHER $100,00
1 4/11/2015 031757 BROILISSA D-VICKERS, LINDA P R 2MEETINGS- 1-2,2-1 A 3..6...18 150m
Check Nbr 031757 BROUSSARD-VICKERS,LINDA 150Y001
1 4/11{2018 031755 CENTENNIAL LAKES POLICE DEPT POLICE SERVICES-APRIL..2018 72,91&75
Check Nbr 0317.58 CENTENNIAL LAKES POLICE DEPT $72,916,75
1 4/:11./2018 0317511 CENTS INT ENERGY 1.785 PELTIER LAKE DR-SERV THRU 3-26-18 $29,88
14/11/2018 031758 CENTERPOINT ENERGY 6570 LAMO DR-SERV THRU 3-26-18 $128.43
14/11/2018 031755 CENTERPOINT ENERGY 2085'x'CEDAR ST-SERV THRU 3-26-18 $583.56
14,111/2018 031759 CENTERPOINT ENERGY 1703 MAIN ST-SERF THRU 3-26-18 $35,93
14/11/2018 0131759 CENTERPOIINT ENERGY 1,880 MAIN ST-SERV THRU 3-26.18 -547,41=
Check Nbr 031759 CENTERPOINT ENERGY
1 4/1.1/2111.5 0131760 CITY OF CENTERVILLE-MASTERCA FUEL 15IL98
14/11/2018 031760 CITY OF CENTERVILLE LE-MASTERCA DUPRE ARTIFACT-ARCHIVAL 1376.59
14/11/201.8 031,760 CITY OF CENTERVILLE-MASTERCA ENDICA FEES-POSTAGE 59.95
14/11/2018 031760 CITY OF CENTERVILLE-MASTERCA SUPPLIES $23434
14/11/2018 0.31760 CITY OF CENTERVILLE-PAS"1 ERCA D.SCH -DEPT OF LABOR&INDUSTRIES LICENSE $9500
14/1112018 031760 CITY OF CENTERVILLE-MASTERCA FUEL $313.52
141111/2018 031760 CITY OF CENTERVILLE-MASTERCA PHONE CASE $31,88
14/11/2018 0131760 CTTY OF CENTERVILLE-MASTERCA MASTERP.PALZER-PARKING-WATER SEMINAR $15001
1 4/11/2.0x8 031760 CITY OF CENTERVILLE-MASTERCA MASTERT BENDER I CFOIA CONFERENCE-SHORTAGE- $70.00
46
CITY OF CENTERVILLE 04/06/18 4:01 PM
Check Detail -April 11, 2018 Page 2
Check
Date Check A Vender Name Comments Amount
Check Nbr 031760 CITY OF CENTERVILLE-MASTERCA, $1,095.26
14/1112018 031761 CITY OF CIRCLE PINES APRIL 2018 POLICE BLDG $5,416-67
14/1112018 031761 CITY OF CIRCLE PINES APRIL 2018 POLICE BLDG $281.98
Check Nbr 031761 CITY OF CIRCLE PINES $5,698.65
14/11/2018 031762 CONNEXUS ENERGY 6800-20111-RADIO FOR CORER AVE-SEAR THRU 3-21-18 $10.04
1, 4/11/2018 031762 CONNEXUS ENERGY STREET LIGHTS-395653-219678-SENA THRU 3-22-18 $51.01
14/11/2018 031762 CONNEXUS ENERGY 6800-20TH-RADIO FOR SCADA AVE-SERA THRU 3-21-18 $1L03
1 4/11/2018 031762 CONNEXUS ENERGY 6900-20TH AV-LIFT STATION-SERA THAN 3-16-18 $74.13
14/11/2018 031762 CONNEXUS ENERGY 7087-20TH AVE WATER TOWER-SERA TURN 3-21-18 $143,73
14,111/2018 031762 CONNEXUS ENERGY 7100-20TH AVE-TRAP SO-SENA RU3-2I-I8 $75,60
141111/2018 031762 CONNEXUS ENERGY 2085 As CEDAR AT-SERA THRU 3-16-18 $310.34
1 4111/2018 031762 CONNEXUS ENERGY STREET LIGHTS-395653-219699-SERA RU3-22-18 $62.95
Check Nbr 031762 CONNEXUS ENERGY $737,83
14/11/2018 031763 DIEM NGUYEN OVER PD FINAL UT BILL-7320 PELTIER CIRCLE $49,62
_$419X62
$
............... -----------------------
Check Nbr 031763 DIEM NGUYEN 419.62-
14/11/2018 031764 GANZEL,KIM P&Z MEETING 2-1-18 $50.00
Check Nbr 031764 GANZEL,KIM $50.00
14/11/2018 031765 HAIDEN,MARK P&Z MEETING- 1-2,2-1&3-6-18 $150,00
...............
Check Nbr 031765 HAIDEN,MARK $150,00
14/11/2018 031766 ISE 2085 As CEDAR ST-SYSTEM MONITORING $1.03-65
Check Nbr 031766 ISE $i3-0 1--6 5-
14111/2018 031767 KY-DAN ELECTRIC INC, OVER PD PERMIT 1862 72ND ST-618-029 $45.00
Check Nbr 031767 KY-DAN ELECTRIC INC. $45.00
14/11/2018 031768 MOSHER,DARRIN P&Z MEETINGS...1..2,2-1&3-6-18 $150.00
Check Nbr 031768 MOSHER, RASKIN $1,50.00
14/11/2018 031769 NATIONWIDE RETIREMENT SOLUTION DER CONN W/H-PAY PERIOD 7 $1,029,83
Check Nbr 031769 NATIONWIDE RETIREMENT SOLUTION $1,020.83
14/11/2018 031770 PETERSON,BRIAN P&R MEETINGS-1-3,2-7&3-21-18 $150.00
Check Nbr 031770 PETERSON, BRIAN $IE4.00
14/11/2018 031771 PRESS PUBLICATIONS SEASONAL P,W.AD $256.00
Check Nbr 031771 PRESS PUBLICATIONS $256.00
14/11/2018 031772 SEELEY,SUZANNE P&R MEETINGS-1-3,2-7 A 3-21-18 $-159.00
Check Nbr 031772 SEELEY,SUZANNE $150,00
14/11/2018 031773 SMITH&GLASER, LLC CLEARWATER CREEK DEV,-SENA THRU JAN, 2018 $199e50
1 4'/11/2018
/11/2018 031773 SMITH&GLASER,LLC PROSECUTION-SERV THAN JAN 2018 $3,258.50
1 A/411/2018 031773 SMITH&GLASER,ULC RUFFRIDGE JOHNSON-SERA T`HRU1 JAN 2018 $1,054.50
14/11/2018 031773 SMITH R,GLASER,LLC REHOEIN DEV.-SERA THRU JAN 2018 $28.50
14111/2018 031773 SMITH&GLASER, LLC PELTIER LAKE DEVELOPMENT-ADDS TURN JAN 2018 $133.00
14/11/2018 u fl17�n j:3IM11—MI°' -C' CRF LLC GENERAL CATL-SEK%f T HSU JAN, 2018
Allj M
14111/2018 031.773 SMITH&GLASER,LLC RUFFRIDGE JOHNSON-SERV THRU FEB, 2018 $266,00
1,4/11/2018 031773 SMITH&GLASER, LLC PELTIER LAKE DEV, -SEAR THAN FEB.2018 $57.00
14/11/2018 031773 SMITH&GLASER, LLC ISD-SEAR T1HRU FEB, 2018 $57.00
14/1-1/2018 431.773 SMITH&GLASER,LLC GENERAL-CIVIL-SERA THRU FEB.2018 $3,239.50
14111/2018 031773 SMITH&GLASER,LLC FEB, PROSECUTION SERVICES $4,658.50
14/11/201.8 031773 smIT-H&GLASER, LLC ISO-SERA THRUI JAN 2018 $38-00
Check Nbr 031773 SMITH Ss GLASER,LLC $14,861.50
14111/2018 031774 TWOHY,NICK P&Z MEETINGS 1-2,2-1 A,3-6-18 $150.00
Check Nbr 031.774 TWOHY,NICK $150,00
47
CITY OF CENTERVILLE 041O&I8 4:01 P
Page 3
Check Detail - April 11, 2018
Crecy
xxAmffmint
4/11/2018 031775 WAEGHE,KEVIN 0 PA R MEETINGS- 1-3, .7&3--21--18 1 ado-
heck Nbr 031775 WAEGHE,KEVIN $150,00
Total Checks $111,030,27
VOIDED Ck##30102
48
CENTENNIAL LAKES POLICE DEPT Check Register-Police GL without invoice numbers Page: 1
Check Issue Dates: 3/22/2018-4/4/2018 Apr 04, 2018 11:12AM
Report Criteria:
Report type: Summary
GL Check Ck No Description Check
Period Issue Date Payee Amount
04/18 04/04/2018 11900 AXON ENTERPRISE, INC MOLLIE MOUNT FOR BC ON VEST 215.68
04/18 04/04/2018 11901 BCA/MNJIS SECTION 1ST QTR CJDN FOR ACCESS 390.00
04/18 04/04/2018 11902 CALIBRE PRESS LLC BULLETPROOF SEMINAR MG 229.00
04/18 04/04/2018 11903 COVERALL OF THE TWIN CITIES INC APRIL CLEANING SERVICE 780.00
04/18 04/04/2018 11904 DON'S CIRCLE SERVICE, INC VEHICLE REPAIRS &MTC 286.89
04/18 04/04/2018 11905 E C S I, LLC GARAGE CARD READER MTC 470.60
04/18 04/04/2018 11906 IMAGE PRINTING&GRAPHICS, INC BUSINESS CARDS RESERVE OFFICE 57.75
04/18 04/04/2018 11907 WILLIAM JACOBSON FRAMED DISPLAY FOR SGT CARLSO 260.58
04/18 04/04/2018 11908 LEAGUE OF MN CITIES INS TRUST P& 2018 PROPERT/LIAB/VEH INS 1/1-12/3 45,308.00
04/18 04/04/2018 11909 OPTUM MONTHLY SERVICE FEE JAN 30.00
04/18 04/04/2018 11910 O'REILLY AUTOMOTIVE, INC WINDSHIELD FLUID 9.16
04/18 04/04/2018 11911 CITY OF ROSEVILLE MARCH PHONES 357.80
04/18 04/04/2018 11912 ROSEVILLE MIDWAY FORD WHEEL COVERS 262.24
04/18 04/04/2018 11913 SUPPLYWORKS TOWELS/TISSUE 590.57
04/18 04/04/2018 11914 TRANS UNION LLC PERSONNEL TESTING 5.30
04/18 04/04/2018 11915 TRANSUNION RISK&ALTERNATIVE INVESTIGATION EXPENSES MARCH 25.00
03/18 03/31/2018 201804 U S BANK VISA EFT-FLOWERS FOR FUNERAL 255.00
Grand Totals: 49,533.57
M = Manual Check, V=Void Check
49
CENTENNIAL LAKES POLICE DEPT Check Register- Police GL without invoice numbers Page: 1
Check Issue Dates: 4/5/2018-4/5/2018 Apr 05, 2018 09:07AM
Report Criteria:
Report type: Summary
GL Check Ck No Description Check
Period Issue Date Payee Amount
04/18 04/05/2018 11916 DELL MARKETING L.P. OPTI PLEX 5050 COMPUTER 1,622.13
04/18 04/05/2018 201805 OPTUM EFT-2ND QTR EMPLOYER HSA CONT 17,039.11
Grand Totals: 18,661.24
M = Manual Check, V=Void Check
50
CENTENNIAL FIRE DISTRICT Check Register- FIRE GL Page: 1
Check Issue Dates: 3/22/2018-4/3/2018 Apr 03, 2018 10:24AM
Report Criteria:
Report type: Summary
GL Check Check Vendor Description Check
Period Issue Date Number Number Payee Amount
04/18 04/03/2018 8157 40041 DELL MARKETING L.P. New Dell Laptop 1,178.46
04/18 04/03/2018 8158 Void Check .00 V
04/18 04/03/2018 8159 131500 MY ALARM CENTER, LLC 2nd Quarterly Security Monitoring 117.30
04/18 04/03/2018 8160 180600 CITY OF ROSEVILLE Mar Phone Service 848.21
04/18 04/03/2018 8161 220200 VERIZON WIRELESS 2/16-3/15 Mobile Broadband 210.14
04/18 04/03/2018 8162 230325 WEX BANK Mar fuel 442.31
04/18 04/03/2018 2018008 80050 HSA BANK 2nd Quarter H.S.A. Contributions 1,278.99
04/18 04/03/2018 2018009 210300 US BANK MN Chap. of the Int'I: Peil & Brude 3,155.65
Grand Totals: 7,231.06
M = Manual Check, V=Void Check
51
CITY OF CENTERVILLE
REQUEST FOR
COUNCIL ACTION entervi(Ce
E77
Agenda Item# Department: Requested Council Meeting Date:
Planning& Zoning April 11, 2018
TITLE OF ISSUE:
Recommendation for Appointments
BACKGROUND AND SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION:
At the April 3, 2018 Planning& Zoning Commission meeting the Commission interviewed a total of four(4)
candidates as one (1) of the original five (5)withdrew their application. The Commission interviewed the
candidates with the prearranged interview questions, discussed and desired to forward a recommendation to
Council to fill their two (2)vacant positions.
COST AND SOURCE(S) OF FUNDING:
REQUESTED COUNCIL ACTION:
Planning& Zoning Commission recommendation to Council to Appoint Mr. Ben Fehrenbacher and Mr. Darrell
Olson, Jr. (DJ)to the Planning& Zoning Commission.
For Clerk's Use:
SUPPORTED DOCUMENTS ATTACHED
Motion By:
Resolution Ordinance Contract Minutes Plan Map
Second By:
Vote Record: A e Nay
King Other(specify)
Love
Paar
Koski
Montain
Administration Department Use:
Refer to:
Consent
Tabled Until:
Regular
Other:
52
CITY OF CENTERVILLE
REQUEST FOR
COUNCIL ACTION entervi(Ce
E77
Agenda Item# Department: Requested Council Meeting Date:
Parks & Recreation April 11, 2018
TITLE OF ISSUE:
Recommendation for Appointment
BACKGROUND AND SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION:
At the April 4, 2018 the Parks & Recreation Committee meeting the Committee interviewed a total of two (2)
candidates. One (1) candidate withdrew their application and they interviewed the other candidate. The
interview process involved the standard prearranged interview questions, the Committee discussed the results
and desired to forward a commendation to Council to fill their vacany.
COST AND SOURCE(S) OF FUNDING:
REQUESTED COUNCIL ACTION:
Parks & Recreation Committee recommendation to Council to Appoint Mr. Jeff Godwin to the Parks &
Recreation Committee.
For Clerk's Use:
SUPPORTED DOCUMENTS ATTACHED
Motion By:
Resolution Ordinance Contract Minutes Plan Map
Second By:
Vote Record: A e Nay
King Other(specify)
Love
Paar
Koski
Montain
Administration Department Use:
Refer to:
Consent
Tabled Until:
Regular
Other:
53
CITY OF CENTERVILLE
REQUEST FOR
COUNCIL ACTION entervi(Ce
E77
Agenda Item# Department: Requested Council Meeting Date:
Administration April 11, 2018
TITLE OF ISSUE:
RFPs for Solid Waste, Recycling& Yard Waste Collection
BACKGROUND AND SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION:
The City is in receipt of four(4) competitive bids from: Advanced Disposal Services, Republic Services,
Walters Recycling& Refuse and Waste Management. Staff would like Council's authorization to negotiate
with the two (2)low bidders prior to your next meeting and bring forth a recommendation at that time.
COST AND SOURCE(S) OF FUNDING:
REQUESTED COUNCIL ACTION:
Staff requests Council's authorization to negotiate with two (2) of the bidders in an attempt to ascertain
additional information to be forward for Council consideration at their April 28, 2018 meeting.
For Clerk's Use:
SUPPORTED DOCUMENTS ATTACHED
Motion By:
Resolution Ordinance Contract Minutes Plan Map
Second By:
Vote Record: A e Nay
King Other(specify)
Love
Paar
Koski
Montain
Administration Department Use:
Refer to:
Consent
Tabled Until:
f Regular
Other:
54
CITY OF CENTERVILLE
REQUEST FOR
COUNCIL ACTION enteryi(Ce
Agenda Item# Department: Requested Council Meeting Date:
TITLE OF ISSUE:
BACKGROUND AND SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION:
Staff would like Council to entertain the possibility of scheduling regular Council Work Sessions one (1) hour
prior to their regularly scheduled meeting once a month in an attempt to aid in more in depth discussions of
topics.
COST AND SOURCE(S) OF FUNDING:
REQUESTED COUNCIL ACTION:
Consideration of this item.
For Clerk's Use:
SUPPORTED DOCUMENTS ATTACHED
Motion By:
Resolution Ordinance Contract Minutes Plan Map
Second By:
Vote Record: A e Nay
King Other(specify)
Love
Paar
Koski
Montain
Administration Department Use:
Refer to:
Consent
Tabled Until:
f Regular
Other:
55
CITY OF CENTERVILLE
REQUEST FOR
COUNCIL ACTION entervi(Ce
Agenda Item# Department: Requested Council Meeting Date:
Parks & Recreation April 11, 2018
TITLE OF ISSUE:
ADA Accessible Port-a-Pot to be placed at Corner Stone Park
BACKGROUND AND SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION:
The Parks & Recreation Committee discussed placing an ADA accessible port-a-pot in Corner Stone Park
during the Bald Eagle Water Ski Shows. The cost would be $125/28 days and it is anticipated that it would be
installed for 4-5 months for a total of$500 - $625.
COST AND SOURCE(S) OF FUNDING:
Parks Maintenance
REQUESTED COUNCIL ACTION:
Staff requests Council's authorization to add an additional ADA accessible port-a-pot to the City's original
contract with an additional charge of$500-$625 for the ski season.
For Clerk's Use:
SUPPORTED DOCUMENTS ATTACHED
Motion By:
Resolution Ordinance Contract Minutes Plan Map
Second By:
Vote Record: A e Nay
King Other(specify)
Love
Paar
Koski
Montain
Administration Department Use:
Refer to:
Consent
Tabled Until:
f Regular
Other:
56
CITY OF CENTERVILLE
REQUEST FOR
COUNCIL ACTION
� e,Ytte r?JZ(fe
Agenda Item# Department: Requested Council Meeting Date:
Administration 4/11/2018
TITLE OF ISSUE:
MCMA Conference Attendance
BACKGROUND AND SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION:
As part of the Administrator's Educational and Career Development Plan, there are several key conferences we
feel are important to attend and organizations that are worthy of engagement. The Minnesota City/County
Management Association and its annual spring conference are in these categories. We are seeking approval for
Mark Statz's attendance at the MCMA Spring Conference (May 2-4), at Grandview Lodge in Nisswa.
The agenda for the conference includes sessions emphasizing leadership skills and community engagement
strategies. Additionally, several of Mark's peer mentors will be in attendance, and this conference is an
excellent opportunity to grow those relationships and extend his network.
COST AND SOURCE(S) OF FUNDING:
$520 registration + $142 lodging+ $150 mileage= $812 - General Fund
REQUESTED COUNCIL ACTION:
Motion to approve conference attendance.
For Clerk's Use:
SUPPORTED DOCUMENTS ATTACHED
Motion By:
Resolution Ordinance Contract Minutes Plan Map
Second By:
Vote Record: A e Nay
King Other(specify)
Love
Paar
Koski
Montain
Administration Department Use:
Refer to:
Consent
Tabled Until:
Regular
Other:
57
Wi R W
RICE CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT
March 23, 2018
Mr. Mark Statz,Administrator
City of Centerville
1880 Main Street
Centerville, MN 55038-9794
Dear Mr.Statz:
The Rice Creek Watershed District Board (RCWD) would like to make its city and county partners aware
of the RCWD priority legislative issues for this legislative session. RCWD has contacted its legislative
delegation requesting support of HF 2687/SF 2419 clarifying public waters and public drainage system
laws.This letter provides information on these bills and their importance.
FIF 2687 and SF 2419 state that Did R permit requirements do not apply to public drainage ditch
maintenance and repairs. Recently,the DNR has begun placing substantial burdens on drainage
authorities and property owners leading to significant delay and increased expense in drainage system
maintenance and repairs. This threatens our ability to maintain the already limited stormaxater
conveyances within your community,The proposed legislation secures existing rights and obligations to
maintain public drainage systems to their"as-constructed"efficiencies while still providing protections
to public water resources.
In apparent response to the proposed legislation,the DRIB has finalized new policy guidance dated
February 28,2018.Though we have concerns with the new guidance,we have yet to see whether
application of the new guidance will substantially impact the timeliness and cost of repairs.
Consequently,we support the bills remaining on hold in committee until we determine how
implementation of the guidance will impact drainage system repairs. RCWD asks that you support this
legislation if the DPIR's implementation of its new guidance continues to disrupt drainage system
maintenance and repairs,
As the public drainage authority,the RCWD is required by law to maintain and repair of the public ditch
systems.This public ditch maintenance is critical to the economy and environment. We have included
background information on this topic.
If you have any questions regarding HF 2687/SF 2419 or any RCWD initiatives, please contact District
Administrator, Phil Belfiori,at763-398-3071or , c.
.............
Sincerely,
Rice Creek Watershed District Board of Managers
Anoka County
Patricia Preiner, President
4325 Pheasant Ridge Drive NE #6111 Blaine, MN 55449 1 T- 763 398 3070 1 F: 763-,398-3088 1 www.ricecreek.org
BOARD OF Michael). Bradley Barbara A. Haake Patricia L. Preiner Steven P. Wagannon John J. Waller
MANAGERS Ramsey County Rarnsey County 58amoka County Anoka County Washington County
Background information Related to HF 2687/SF 2419 Clarifying Public Waters and
Public Drainage System Laws
Stormwater conveyance in the Rice Creek Watershed is limited. Much of the existing conveyance
consists of public drainage systems(ditches and tiles)that were established in the late-1800s to mid-
1900s. These drainage systems initially tied together large areas of low,wet ground to allow for the
development of agriculture.They now serve as an outlet for urbanization and other development.These
drainage systems are the only way stormwater can leave any residential and commercial areas. New
development and re-development may be restricted if maintenance of these systems is impeded.
In recent years,the DNR has changed its practices and has required that the RCWD go through a
permitting process for drainage system repairs. The and has cooperated with the DNR, but this
cooperation is expensive as it requires RCWD to increase its reliance on outside engineering and legal
consultants. The DNR recently finalized new policy guidance dated February 28, 2018.Though we have
concerns with the new guidance because it changes longstanding policies and imposes additional
regulatory restrictions on drainage system repairs,we have yet to see whether application of the new
guidance will substantially impact the timeliness and cost of repairs. It is the RC D's position that this
proposed draft DNR policy goes beyond the authority granted by the legislature.
The State enacted a number of laws related to water resources after the establishment of the public
drainage systems in the Rice Creek Watershed. one of these laws required the inventory of public
waters.With the public waters law, and more generally the state's water laws, was a commitment that
these laws would not restrict existing rights'—including those related to the existence of and obligation
to maintain public drainage systems.
The public waters inventory was never intended to restrict the right to maintain existing drainage
systems.The legislature specifically exempted repairs from DNR permitting';gave the DNR a mechanism
to ensure proposed work qualified as a repair; and directed the DNR to provide for the lawful function
of public drainage systems that affected public waters'.The DNR also adopted a rule exempting repairs
from permittings and announced a policy in 1980 that stated repair of public drainage systems should be
allowed without permits.
More recent DNR practices have departed from the 1980 policy and its own rule. The agency has
increasingly required permits,approvals, and conditions specifically contrary to current law and the
1980 policy, This has resulted in increased costs and delays for necessary repairs. The DNR is currently
proposing a new policy that formalizes its current practices.The new guidance continues the current
departure from historic practices but does address some of the concern sought to be corrected by the
proposed legislation.
.................................................................
Minn.Stat. § 105.39(1978),currently§103A.101
2 Minn.Stat. §103G.245
Minn.Stat. §103E.701
4 Minn.Stat.§ 103 .225
Minn.Rule part 6115.0200,subp.4
2
59
. .........
ME,
IN M
Er t. FFFF.
FOR— V
March 28, 2018
City of Centerville
1880 Main St
fCanterville, MN 55038
0 E,
n behalf of Midwest Events and F"ronfRonner REverds we wish to thank line City of
Centerville, MN ,.,ar your hocietality in allowing us to again conduct our Shake Your
Sh
.,'Op
I Earn , ck 8K arid 5K rurvwalk in the City on March I Tth,
'lie event was another Soup, w; wit I f I*,,- runners and it cotAildn't have happened'
-a
without the support and cooperation from everyone involved with tile racen the City
f 0 Cenip I v I er ille. Parks arid Recreation Department and Centennial Lakes, Fblice,
A special thapliks to Teresa Bender taking the time to work with LIS a.-. the final details
of the event,
o
As in the previous yearr, many runners. came up to tell us what a great E U- o"Lig t,ti
ml
'his is, They vvere, irnpreesspi:1 with the verillie,
We look forward to next years race..
Thank you for,
your support-
Brigid and TerryThoMpson
Midwest Events
1890 Whitaker Avenue
White Bear Lake, MN 155110
651-251-5494
60