Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2018-04-25 CC Packet t enterviCCITY OF CENTERVILLE C e BOARD OF APPEAL & EQUALIZATION COUNCIL MEETING Wednesday, April 25, 2018 6:30 p.m. Board of Review and Equalization Council Meeting immediately following BOARD OF APPEAL & EQUALIZATION L CALL TO ORDER 1. Roll Call II. PRESENTATIONS 1. Mr. Ken Tolzmann (Pages 1-49) III. PUBLIC HEARING 1. Board of Appeal & Equalization IV. ADJOURNMENT COUNCIL MEETING L CALL TO ORDER 1. Roll Call II. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE III. APPROVAL OF AGENDA IV. APPOINTMENTS/PRESENTATIONS 1. None V. PUBLIC HEARING 1. None VL APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. April 11, 2018 City Council Meeting Minutes (Pages 50-56) VII. CONSENT AGENDA 1. City of Centerville April 12, 2018 through April 25, 2018 Claims (Check#31787- 31798) (Page 57) 2. Centennial Lakes Police claims through April 18, 2018 (Check#11918-11948) (Pages 58-59) 3. Centennial Fire District Claims through April 19, 2018 (Check#8168-8179) (Page 60) 4. Anoka County Radio Club Use of LaMotte Park Parking Lot for ACRC/ARRL Field Day, 2018—June 22-24, 2018 (Page 61) 5. Enter into an Agreement w/Anoka County for Residential Recycling Program (Pages 62-74) 6. Request for Raffle Permit—Renegade Pigs Motorcycle Club on Behalf of Rumble Industries (July 21, 2018), 2030 Main Street (Pages 75-80) 7. Request for Raffle Permit—Church of St. Genevieve's Annual Chicken Dinner (August 19, 2018), 6995 Centerville Road (Pages 81-84) VIII. OLD BUSINESS 1. Portable Restroom at Cornerstone Park(Page 85) 2. Assign EDA Representatives from City Council IX. NEW BUSINESS 1. Review Changes to the Fee Schedule (Pages 86-88) 2. Street Sign Replacements (Pages 89-90) 3. Acceptance of Centerville Lions P & R Donation (Page 91) X. COUNCIL/ADMINISTRATOR ANNOUNCEMENTS 1. Administrator/Engineer Report (Pages 92-94) XL ADJOURNMENT *INFORMATIONAL MATERIAL** MN Dept. of Health Sanitary Survey Report for Centerville Public Water System (PWS) (Pages 95- 102) *REMINDERS** P&Z Committee— Tuesday May 1 2018 —6:30 p.m. City Hall P&R Committee—Wednesday May 2 2018 —6:30 p.m. City Hall City Council Meeting—Wednesday, May 9, 2018 —6:30 p.m. City Hall Recycling Saturdays: 9:00 a.m. — 12:00 p.m. (Green Lights Recycling, 1525 — 99th Lane N.E., Blaine) May 12, June 9, July 14, August 11, September 8, October 13, November 10 & December 8, 2018 Kenneth A. Tolzmann Sr. Accredited Minnesota Assessor Centerville City Assessor TO: City of Centerville Attn: Mr. Mark Statz, Administrator FROM: Kenneth A. Tolzmann, SAMA#1939 Centerville City Assessor DATE: April 13, 2018 RE: 2018 Pay 2019 Assessment Report Introduction I have prepared this 2018 Assessment Report for use by the City Council and Residents. The Assessment Report includes general information about both the appeals and assessment process, as well as specific information regarding this 2018 assessment. Minnesota Statutes establish specific requirements for the assessment of property. The law requires that all real property be valued at market value, which is defined as the usual or most likely selling price as of January 2, 2018. The estimated market values established through the 2018 assessment are based upon qualified sales of Centerville properties taking place from October 1, 2016 through September 30, 2017. From this sales information, our mass appraisal system is used to determine individual property values. Property owners who have questions or concerns regarding the market value set for their property are asked to contact me prior to this meeting. This allows me the opportunity to answer any questions they might have. I have found that a large number of property owner concerns can be resolved by discussion. If I am unable to resolve a property owner's concerns regarding their market value, the appeal can be brought to this local Board of Appeal and Equalization. The 2018 Assessment Summary State Statutes require all real property within the City of Centerville to be valued at market value as of the January 2nd assessment date. The 2018 assessment has met all assessment standards set by the State of Minnesota. Statistically, based upon the 64 qualified sales within the City during this sales period, and after value adjustments made accordingly by zone, the final result was an assessment that qualifies as "excellent" in the eyes of the Minnesota Dept. of Revenue with a median sales ratio of 94.6%, a coefficient of dispersion of 8.5, and a Price Related Differential of 100. 1 With respect to the effect of these new sales had on the overall market value of the City. For last years assessment, we saw a total market value of$401,214,100. Upon the application of the new sales information gathered this past year, the total market value of the City (tax base) rose by 7.2%to $429,940,900 for this 2018 assessment. Included in this new overall market value is $3,815,400 in new construction. I have included the Minneapolis Assn. of Realtors Residential Real Estate Report which includes much historical data surrounding the state of the real estate market in Centerville as well as the entire area. The 2017 Report states that market values increased by 3.4% in Centerville last year. The median sales price went from $235,000 in 2015, to $243,000 in 2017. The MAAR also noted that home values in the City have increased by 27.9% since 2014. This is indeed good news for homeowners in Centerville Looking Forward Presently there are 12 qualified residential sales of record for next year's 2019 assessment. Comparing these 2018 market values to the sales prices observed, a median sales price of 94.9% & coefficient of 5.5 is observed. If this present trend continues, we will most likely see continued overall growth in market values for next years' assessment. Closing As your City Assessor, it is my priority to represent your community with utmost dignity and respect, and to make every property owner feel as though they are being heard. Obviously, I'm not able to tell everyone just what they want to hear, but it is my hope that through explanation, and discussion, there can be a better understanding. If there are any questions from members of the City Council or City Staff, or City Residents, please do not hesitate to call me. I am available to City residents always during normal business hours and by appointment on evenings and weekends. In closing, I would like to take this opportunity to thank the City of Centerville for allowing me the privilege of serving as your City Assessor. I can assure you that I take the responsibilities of those duties most seriously. If you or anyone has questions relating to property tax assessment, I would be most pleased to discuss these issues with you. You can reach me at my office at(651) 464- 4862 or my cell at(612) 865-2149. Sincerely, Kenneth A. Tolzmann, SAMA#1939 Centerville City Assessor 2 City of Centerville Board of Equalization Meeting Centerville, Minnesota April 25, 2018 i e/ V to 1 i/ iffe 1880 Wain Streaf.Centers No.,�LLV'S�U3N 651-729-3232orFa;651-929-8629 Kewx-OA Tom SMU Cbmbrvift CifyAssessw 7 City of Centerville Table of Contents AssessmentCalendar.........................................................................................................................3 The2018 Assessment........................................................................................................................4 QuintileAreas Inspected.....................................................................................................................5 Reassessment.....................................................................................................................................6 MarketValue .......................................................................................................................................6 Authority of the Local Board of Appeal and Equalization..................................................................7 LocalMarket Values..........................................................................................................................10 2018 Market Value by Property Type..............................................................................................11 Residential Appraisal System...........................................................................................................12 SalesStudies.....................................................................................................................................12 SalesStatistics Defined ....................................................................................................................13 Current Sales Study Statistics..........................................................................................................14 Residential Tax Changes Examined................................................................................................15 2018 Real Estate Tax Information....................................................................................................15 AppealsProcedure............................................................................................................................16 SampleMarket Value Notice............................................................................................................18 Sample Property Tax Statement......................................................................................................20 APPENDIX.........2017 Residential Annual Housing Market Report(Mpls Board of Realtors) -r 2 City of Centerville 2018 Assessment Calendar January 2 2018 Market Values for Property Established February 1 Final Day to Deliver Assessment Records to County February 1 Final Day to File for an Exemption from Taxation March 1 Final day to file for 1 b with Commissioner of Revenue March 16 2018 Valuation Notices Mailed April 17 Local Board of Appeal and Equalization April 30 Final Day to File a Tax Court Petition for 2015 Assessment May 15 First Half Payable 2018 Taxes Due May 29 Final Date for Manufactured homes assessed as personal property to establish homestead May 31 State Board of Equalization June 11 County Board of Appeal and Equalization (6:00 PM) July 1 2018 Assessment Finalized July 1 Date by which taxable property becomes exempt August 15 Final Day to File for 2017 Property Tax Refund August 31 Final Day to Pay the First Half Manufactured Home Taxes September 1 2018 Abstract to the Department of Revenue October 15 Second Half Pay 2018 Taxes Due November 15 Anticipated Day to mail Pay 2019 Proposed Tax Notices December 1 Last Day to Establish Homestead for pay 2019 December 15 Final Day to File Homestead Application for pay 2019 3 City of Centerville The 2018 Assessment The 2018 assessment should be a reflection of the 2016/2017 market conditions. Sales of property are constantly analyzed to chart the activity of the market place. The Assessing staff does not create value; they only measure its movement. Assessing property values equitably is part science, part judgment and part communication skill. Training as an assessor cannot tell us how to find the "perfect" value of a property, but it does help us consistently produce the same estimate of value for identical properties. That after all, is the working definition of equalization. As of January 2, 2018, there were 1,614 taxable parcel/accounts in the City. That is essentially the same as from 2017. This total includes: • 1,428 residential parcels • 96 non-taxable parcels • 83 commercial and industrial parcels • 2 apartment/nursing home/man. housing parcels • 0 manufactured home accounts • 1 personal property account • 0 railroad parcels • 4 agricultural parcels • 0 utility parcels Current state law mandates that all property must be re-assessed each year and physically reviewed once every five years. We also inspect all properties with new construction each year. During 2017 1 reviewed 301 existing properties as well as 48 new construction parcels for a total of 349 parcels. a 4 City of Centerville For the 2018 Assessment, parcels in Section 14 QQ11 thru Q043 were reviewed as part of the 5 year reinspection requirement by the Dept. of Revenue. For the 2018 Assessment, parcels in Section 14 and Section 23 QQ 11 and Section 24 Townhomes. 5 City of Centerville Reassessment State Statute reads: "All real property subject to taxation shall be listed and reassessed every year with reference to its value on January 2nd preceding the assessment." This has been done, and the owners of property in Centerville have been notified of any value change. Minnesota Statute 273.11 reads: "All property shall be valued at its market value." It further states that "In estimating and determining such value, the Assessor shall not adopt a lower or different standard of value because the same is to serve as a basis for taxation, nor shall the assessor adopt as a criterion of value the price for which such property would sell at auction or at a forced sale, or in the aggregate with all the property in the town or district, but the assessor shall value each article or description of property by itself, and at such sum or price as the assessor believes the same to be fairly worth in money." The Statute says all property shall be valued at market value, not may be valued at market value. This means that no factors other than market factors should affect the Assessor's value and the subsequent action by the Board of Equalization. Market Value Market value has been defined many different ways. One way used by many appraisers is the following: The most probable price that a property should bring in a competitive and open market under all conditions requisite to a fair sale, the buyer and seller each acting prudently and knowledgeably, and assuming the price is not affected by any undue stimulus. Implicit in this definition is the consummation of a sale as of a specified date and the passing of title from seller to buyer under conditions whereby: (1) buyer and seller are typically motivated: (2) both parties are well informed or well advised, and acting in what they consider their own best interests; (3) a reasonable time is allowed for exposure in the open market; (4) payment is made in terms of cash in U.S. dollars or in terms of financial arrangements comparable thereto; (5) the price represents the normal consideration for the property sold unaffected by special or creative financing or sales concessions granted by anyone associated with the sale. W8 6 City of Centerville Authority of the Local Board of Equalization Assessments of property are made to provide the means for the measuring of the relative share of each taxpayer in the meeting of the costs of local government. It is the duty of the Assessor to assess all real and personal property except that which is exempt or taxable under some special method of taxation. If the burden of local government is to be fairly and justly shared among the owners of all property of value, it is necessary that all taxable property be listed on the tax rolls and that all assessments be made accurately. Whenever any property that should be assessed is omitted from the tax rolls, an unfair burden falls upon the owners of all property that has been assessed. If any property is undervalued in relation to the other property on the assessment record, the owners of the other property are called upon automatically to assume part of the tax burden that should be borne by the undervalued property. Fairness and justice in property taxation demands both completeness and equality in assessment. Minnesota Statutes Section 274.01 provides that the council of each city shall be or appoint a Board of Appeal and Equalization. The charter of certain cities provides for the establishment of a Board of Equalization. The provisions of Section 274.01 and this regulation apply to all Boards of Appeal or Boards of Equalization. The 2003 Legislature enacted State Statute 274.014 which requires that there be at least one member at each meeting of a Local Board of Appeal and Equalization (beginning with the 2006 local boards) who has attended an appeals and equalization course developed or approved by the Commissioner of Revenue within the last four years. (The member must attend the course by no later than January 1, 2006.) Mayor Mary Capra as well as Councilmembers Ben Fehrenbacher and Jeff Paar, have met this requirement for the City of Centerville. Section 274.01 states the county assessor shall fix a date for each Board of Appeal and Equalization to meet for the purpose of reviewing the assessment of property in its respective town or city. The county assessor is required to serve written notice to the clerk of each of such bodies on or before February 15th of each year. These meetings are required to be held between April 1st and May 31st; and the clerk of the Board of Appeal and Equalization is required to give published and posted notice at least ten days before the date set for the first meeting. The Board of Appeal and Equalization of any city, unless a longer period is approved by the Commissioner of Revenue, must complete its work and adjourn within twenty days (20) from the time of convening specified in the notice of the clerk. No action taken subsequent to such date shall be valid. A request for additional time in order to complete the work of the Board of Appeal and Equalization must be addressed to the Commissioner of Revenue in writing. The Commissioner's approval is necessary to legalize any procedure subsequent to the expiration of the twenty-day period. The Commissioner of 9 7 City of Centerville Revenue will not, however, extend the time for local Boards of Appeal and Equalization to meet beyond the time when the County Board of Equalization meets, which is the final two weeks of June. The authority of the local Board extends over the individual assessments of real and personal property. The Board does not have the power to increase or decrease by percentage all of the assessments in the district of a given class of property. Changes in aggregate assessments by classes are made by the County Board of Equalization. Although the Local Board of Appeal and Equalization has the authority to increase or reduce individual assessments, the total of such adjustments must not reduce the aggregate assessment made by the Assessor by more than one percent of said aggregate assessment. If the total of such adjustments does lower the aggregate assessment made by the Assessor by more than one percent, none of the adjustments will be allowed. This limitation does not apply, however, to the correction of clerical errors or to the removal of duplicate assessments. The Local Board of Appeal and Equalization does not have the authority in any year to reopen former assessments on which taxes are due and payable. The Board considers only the assessments that are in process in the current year. Adjustment can be made only by the process of abatement or by legal action. In reviewing the individual assessments, the Board may find instances of undervaluation. Before the Board can raise the market value of property it must notify the owner. The law does not prescribe any particular form of notice except that the person whose property is to be increased in value must be notified of the intent of the Board to make the increase. The Local Board of Appeal and Equalization meetings assure a property owner an opportunity to contest any other matter relating to the taxability of their property. The Board is required to review the matter and make any corrections that it deems just. When a Local Board of Appeal and Equalization convenes, it is necessary that a majority of the members be in attendance in order that any valid action may be taken. The local assessor is required by law to be present with his/her assessment books and papers. He/she is required also to take part in the proceedings but has no vote. In addition to the local assessor, the county assessor or one of his/her assistants is required to attend. The Board should proceed immediately to review the assessments of property. The Board should ask the local assessor and county assessor to present any tables that have been prepared, making comparisons of the current assessments in the district. The county assessor is required to have maps and tables relating particularly to land values for the guidance of Boards of Appeal and Equalization. Comparisons should be presented of assessments of types of property with previous years and with other assessment districts in the same county. It is the primary duty of each Board of Appeal and Equalization to examine the assessment record to see that all taxable property in the assessment district has been properly placed upon the list and valued by the assessor. In case any property, either real or personal, has been omitted; the Board has the duty of making the assessment. in 8 City of Centerville The complaints and objections of persons who feel aggrieved with any assessments for the current year should be considered very carefully by the Board. Such assessments must be reviewed in detail and the Board has the authority to make corrections it deems to be just. The Board may recess from day to day until all cases have been heard. If complaints are received after the adjournment of the Board of Appeal and Equalization they must be handled on the staff level; as a property owner cannot appear before a higher board unless he or she has first appeared at the lower board levels. Pursuant to Minnesota Statute 274.01: The Board may not make an individual market value adjustment or classification change that would benefit the property in cases where the owner or other person having control over the property will not permit the assessor to inspect the property and the interior of any buildings or structures. A non-resident may file written objections to his/her assessment with the county assessor prior to the meeting of the Board of Appeal and Equalization. Such objections must be presented to the Board for consideration while it is in session. Before adjourning, the Board of Appeal and Equalization should cause the record of the official proceedings to be prepared. The law requires that the proceedings be listed on a separate form which is appended to the assessment book. The assessments of omitted property must be listed in detail and all assessments that have been increased or decreased should be shown as prescribed in the form. After the proceedings have been completed, the record should be signed and dated by the members of the Board of Appeal and Equalization. It is the duty of the county assessor to enter changes by Boards of Appeal and Equalization in the assessment book of each district. The Local Board of Appeal and Equalization has the opportunity of making a great contribution to the equality of all assessments of property in a district. No other agency in the assessment process has the knowledge of the property within a district that is possessed jointly by the individual members of a Board of Appeal and Equalization. The County or State Board of Equalization cannot give the detailed attention to individual assessments that is possible in the session of the Local Board. The faithful performance of duty by the Local Board of Appeal and Equalization will make a direct contribution to the attainment of equality in meeting the costs of providing the essential services of local government. The 2018 assessment should be a reflection of the 2017 market conditions. Sales of property are constantly analyzed to chart the activity of the market place. 9 City of Centerville Local Market Values After thorough studies of the sales in the market place are conducted, we establish the assessed value of all real property. During the 2016/2017 study period, we recorded 95 sales, of which we considered 72 to be "arms-length" sales. There were only 4 bank/foreclosure sales in Centerville during 2016. This was only half as many foreclosures as last year(8). In accordance with the results of these sales studies, downward adjustments were made to all areas of the city with certain styles and grades of homes having larger decreases than others. This will more properly reflect current market trends. According to the Minneapolis Area Association of Realtors, the median home sales price in Centerville increased 3.4%from $235,000 in 2016 to$243,000 in 2017. This amounts to a 27.9% increase in value since 2013. A major contributing factor leading to this sharp increase in market value, is the direct correlation between sales price received and the reduction of the impact bank owned home sales in the City since 2012. The 2018 assessment that is up for your review has a total unaudited assessed value of $429,940,900. It reflects an approximate valuation increase of 7.1% compared to the 2017 assessment of $401,214,100. Also included in this figure is the addition of $3,815,400 in new construction. 12 10 City of Centerville 2018 Market Value Comparison?? 2018 ASSESSMENT PERCENT OF TOTAL MARKET VALUE APARTMENTS .2% COMMERCIAL ❑APARTMENTS 3.7% ❑COMMERCIAL ❑INDUSTRIAL RESIDENTIAL 96.1% ❑RESIDENTIAL 77 City of Centerville Residential Appraisal System Per State Statute, each property must be physically inspected and individually appraised once every five years. For this individual appraisal, or in the event of an assessed value appeal, we use two standard appraisal methods to determine and verify the estimated market value of our residential properties: 1. First, an appraiser inspects each property to verify data. If we are unable to view the interior of a home on the first visit, a notice is left requesting a return telephone call from the owner to schedule this inspection. Interior inspections are necessary to confirm our data on the plans and specifications of new homes and to determine depreciation factors in older homes. 2. To calculate the estimated market value from the property data we use a Computer Assisted Mass Appraisal (CAMA) system based on a reconstruction less depreciation method of appraisal. The cost variables and land schedules are developed through an analysis of stratified sales within the city. This method uses the "Principle of Substitution" and calculates what a buyer would have to a to replace each home today less age pay p Y 9 a;= dependent depreciation. 3. A comparative market analysis is used to verify these estimates. The properties used for these studies are those that most recently have sold and by computer analysis, are most comparable to the subject property taking into consideration construction quality, location, size, style, etc. The main point in doing a market analysis is to make sure that you are comparing "apples with apples". This will make the comparable properties "equivalent to" the subject property and establish a probable sale price of the subject. These three steps give us the information to verify our assessed value or to adjust it if necessary. Sales Studies According to State Law, it is the assessor's job to appraise all real property at market value for property tax purposes. As a method of checks and balances, the Department of Revenue uses statistics and ratios relating to assessed market value and current sale prices to confirm that the law is upheld. Assessors use similar statistics and sales ratios to identify market trends in developing market values. A sales ratio is obtained by comparing the assessor's market value to the adjusted sales price of each property sold in an arms-length transaction within a fixed period. An "arms-length" transaction is one that is generated after a property has had sufficient time on the open market, between both an informed buyer and seller with no undue pressure on either party. The median or mid-point ratios are calculated and stratified by property classification. 100% CE 14 12 City of Centerville The only perfect assessment would have a 100% ratio for every sale. This is of course, is impossible. Because we are not able to predict major events that may cause significant shifts in the market, the state allows a 15% margin of error. The Department of Revenue adjusts the median ratio by the percentage of growth from the previous year's abstract value of the same class of property within the same jurisdiction. This adjusted median ratio must fall between 90% and 105%. Any deviation will warrant a state mandated jurisdiction-wide adjustment of at least 5%. To avoid this increase, the Anoka County Assessor requests a median sales ratio of 94.5%. Countywide, we have the ability to stratify the ratios by style, age, quality of construction, size, land zone and value. This assists us in appraising all of our properties closer to our goal ratio. Sales Statistics Defined In addition to the median ratio, we have the ability to develop other statistics to test the accuracy of the assessment. Some of these are used at the state and county level also. The primary statistics used are: Aggregate Ratio: This is the total market value of all sale properties divided by the total sale prices. It, along with the mean ratio, gives an idea of our assessment level. Within the city, we constantly try to achieve an aggregate and mean ratio of 94% to 95% to give us a margin to account for a fluctuating market and still maintain ratios within state mandated guidelines. Mean Ratio: The mean is the average ratio. We use this ratio not only to watch our assessment level, but also to analyze property values by development, type of dwelling and value range. These studies enable us to track market trends in neighborhoods, popular housing types and classes of property. Coefficient of Dispersion (COD): The COD measures the accuracy of the assessment. It is possible to have a median ratio of 93% with 300 sales, two ratios at 93%, 149 at 80% and 149 at 103%. Although this is an excellent median ratio, there is obviously a great inequality in the assessment. The COD indicates the spread of the ratios from the mean or median ratio. The goal of a good assessment is a COD of 10 to 20. A COD under 10 is considered excellent and anything over 20 will mean an assessment review by the Department of Revenue. Price Related Differential (PRD): This statistic measures the equality between the assessment of high and low valued property. A PRD over 100 indicates a regressive assessment, or the lower valued properties are assessed at a greater degree than the higher. A PRD of less than 100 indicates a progressive assessment or the opposite. A perfect PRD of 100 means that both higher and lower valued properties are assessed exactly equal. 13 City of Centerville Current Sales Study Statistics The following statistics are based upon ratios calculated using 2017 pay 2018 market values and October 2015 - September 2016 sales. These are the ratios that our office uses for citywide equalization, checking assessment accuracy, and predicting trends in the market. Statistic 2018 Median Ratio: 94.63 COD: 8.58 Sales: 64 2018 Centerville Residential Ratio by Zone Zone/Code Neighborhood Desc. #Sales Median CE01 AGRICULTURAL 0 na CE02 DOWNTOWN CENTERVILLE 0 na CE03 NORTHSIDE AVERGE 24 94.6 CE04 2.5 TP 10 ACRE RES 0 na CE05 LAKESHORE 2 92% CE06 SOUTHSIDE AVERAGE 6 94.6 CE07 ABOVE AVERAGE RES 19 94.6 CE08 AVERAGE TOWNHOMES 8 94.4 CE09 ABOVE AVERAGE TOWNHOMES 4 94.5 ALL ZONES 56 94.49 There were 4 foreclosure/bank sales in the 2018 sales study. 16 14 City of Centerville Residential Tax Changes Examined Although the Assessor's Office is considered by many to be the primary reason for any property tax changes, there are actually several elements that can contribute to this change, including, but not limited to: • Changes in the approved levies of individual taxing jurisdictions. • Bond referendum approvals. • Tax rate changes approved by the State Legislature. • Changes to the homestead credit, educational credits, agricultural aid, special programs (including "This Old House", limitations on increases in value) approved by the State Legislature. • Changes in assessed market value. • Changes in the classification (use) of the property. A combination of any of these factors can bring about a change in the annual property tax bill. 2018 Real Estate Tax Information The 2018 real estate tax bills were sent out around the middle of March. A brief review of the tax procedure is provided. Discussion The real estate tax is an ad valorem tax; that is, a tax levied based on the value of the property. The calculation of the tax requires two variables, a tax capacity value and the district tax capacity rate applicable to each individual property. Tax Capacity Tax capacity value is a percentage of the taxable market value of a property. State law sets the percent. Determination of tax capacity values have historically changed over the years although the payable 2018 are mostly unchanged. For the taxes payable in 2018 the rates are as follows: Tax capacity value for residential homestead property is determined as follows: Res. Homestead (1A) Taxable Market Value First$500,000 @ 1.00% Taxable Market Value Over$500,000 @ 1.25% Tax capacity value for rental residential property is determined as follows: One unit(413131) Taxable Market Value First$500,000 @ 1.00% Taxable Market Value Over$500,000 @ 1.25% Two to three-unit s (4131) Taxable Market Value All @ 1.25% Apts 4+ units (4A) Estimated Market Value All @ 1.25% Low Inc. Rental Housing Estimated Market Value All @75% Tax capacity value for commercial/industrial property is determined as follows: Commercial/Industrial (3A) Estimated Market Value First$150,000 @ 1.50% Over$150,000 @ 2.00% Note: These rates do not include the homestead exclusion that is calculated from the overall tax capacity value. This homestead exclusion deduction from taxable market value is based on a sliding scale up to a maximum market value of$414,000. 17 15 City of Centerville Appeals Procedure Each spring Anoka County sends out a property tax bill. Three factors that affect the tax bill are: 1. The amount your local governments (town, city, county, etc.) spend to provide services to your community, 2. the taxable market value of your property, and 3. the classification of your property(how it is used). The assessor determines the final two factors. You may appeal the value or classification of your property. Informal Appeal 0 Property owners are encouraged to call the appraiser or assessor whenever they have questions or concerns about their market value, classification of the property, or the assessment process. 0 Almost all questions can be answered during this informal appeal process. 0 When taxpayers call questioning their market value, every effort is made to make an appointment to inspect properties that were not previously inspected. 0 If the data on the property is correct, the appraiser is able to show the property owner other sales in the market that support the estimated market value. 0 If errors are found during the inspection, or other factors indicate a value reduction is warranted, the appraiser can easily make the changes at this time. Local Board of Equalization 0 The Local Board of Equalization includes the mayor and city council members. 0 The Board meets during April and early May. This year the Board meets on April 25th at 6:30 PM. 0 Taxpayers can make their appeal in person or by letter. 0 The assessor is present to answer any questions and present evidence supporting their value. County Board of Appeal and Equalization In order to appeal to the County Board of Appeal and Equalization, a property owner must first appeal to the Local Board of Appeal and Equalization. The County Board of Appeal and Equalization follows the Local Board of Appeal and Equalization in the assessment appeals process. iQ 16 City of Centerville 0 Their role is to ensure equalization among individual assessment districts and classes of property. 0 The board meets during the final ten working days in June. In 2017 it will commence on June 11th at 6:00 pm. 0 A taxpayer must first appeal to the local board before appealing to the county board. Decisions of the County Board of Appeal and Equalization can be appealed to tax court. Minnesota Tax Court The Tax Court has statewide jurisdiction. Except for an appeal to the Supreme Court, the Tax Court shall be the sole, exclusive and final authority for the hearing and determination of all questions of law and fact arising under the tax laws of the state. There are two divisions of tax court: the small claims division and the regular division. The Small Claims Division of the Tax Court only hears appeals involving one of the following situations: • The assessor's estimated market value of the property is <$300,000 • The entire parcel is classified as a residential homestead and the parcel contains no more than one dwelling unit. • The entire property is classified as an agricultural homestead. • Appeals involving the denial of a current year application for homestead classification of the property. The proceedings of the small claims division are less formal and property owners often represent themselves. There is no official record of the proceedings. Decisions made by the small claims division are final and cannot be appealed further. Small claims decisions do not set precedent. The Regular Division of the Tax Court will hear all appeals, including those within the jurisdiction of the small claims division. Decisions made here can be appealed to a higher court. The principal office for the Tax Court is located in St. Paul. However, the Tax Court is a circuit court and can hold hearings at any other place within the state so that taxpayers may appear with as little inconvenience and expense to the taxpayer as possible. Appeals of property located in Anoka County are heard at the Anoka County Courthouse, with trials scheduled to begin on Thursdays. Three judges make up the Tax Court. Each may hear and decide cases independently. However, a case may be tried before the entire court under certain circumstances. The petitioner must file in tax court on or before April 30 of the year in which the tax is payable. in 17 City of Centerville Sample-Valuation Notice ............... %noki Count% III&XI RMI 2017 SMrH JDHk L 41, 1—1,1— ST AND"MN SSWI 7 ft. LO!S$0 1&A 0 T';+.;E bt limr 4v-prwal or quv0iQtt—or 1234 410'.+"UZE ST ON i~NOW v—rrjm",% ad%,.jm- 114.10 lHt^pad LJ llx .—d 1. Last Boal err►ppaal and ielue4,ekon OR Open Bno.weave .—../i` i u.:an M "01 Cowdv Board of Awo and CQUAW-0*0 •11 21:t r, 1:($.V.i A—W Wnl • PIN-=r:c-arl) Property Class jprevicue assessment year)---D(i3K-2s %qSIr,43r. it tre o!L- r P P I atti CISSI jZril@ aebetamenty@ar)-ortaXe'Fay'Zle^e%:.ea- E ta LZ"."31 :re D-i---r,mit 11K.N)H, :r :;.2!r TaNel 14e-W tTpfov$,relfj 1,jlUq-13-2 m3rw.i7 131.12 C.a m3r;e:i, l:xzTj Green ACr9giRural Preverys,Ag PTeserve,0pen Sp&Cg 1j4jEU6 Deferred-1"0-q.SL.'. ]7,35e7'erg Platted VaCant Lana Deferral- lar -a!ria rzca-t}oic-)-ate. JQ7.z trnz Tnis Old house Exclucon-?,-3r).L-t:T -A lzx3s"." v, :rp-r.% f C-2( -,,e C-2e v r-A-Z K 01 Balved Veterans Eicvuslan- v5aZe: il;erar!E r.a;t-2 A- .2 r.3 3".a.,.r i: Homestead Market tiaiue Ex,;ius!Cn-A:p[e:1,-JA^:13 :rizt,ea3m 3-:::i,.?ro4Ej. gi-agi a--- r-2-:;-z.1 arl z-3go-11'.; --T•Ve ;Z T-.EXVLI 4^[a a-axl!',.n 'r,3'k2l.31-. i---'.'E-JeCfi3HS t%r 3 LE D'2r :rmeS :r M:fe 1, Tax3UIs Market .,a;ul)-tr 3 tr,P,Ce- 31 7: Leval Board 0 Appeal and Eqjailzatcn-:'2 3ojrna-,;;-.r2-.mte, :L"r-3 0'r'P-271 3-La a...-,3e L S':fr-.r',- r :re C-D-ZEE 7. County Board of Appeal and Equalizadun-if r:j Eatjzflej _-,_3!E-a,z-:1 4cea 3f-1 EqL3iZ3TJ:' 'i ire 310'eH 3-: --E 3p,23! r:ce— n to rage m.re r':,r73i,-" 3pce31 P'0:eEE .......................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 20 78 City of Centerville Sample - Back of Valuation Notice Appealing the Value or Definitions Classification of Your Property ❑isanled Veterans Exclusion•Qual fynr:rl sa!�led InforrnaIAppea 1Options-Contact You-Asses sor verera:Irma} ccglole'oravaLatJn,•xrIus;nnoiI If yn r'I.Ye�lli?TllonS nr dl5 agree:+Ill•i'.L.lds5 flCpl!en [Ill:ir I1CI rI�i[?�.^.prlllert';. or F. rna led Inn rRel volae for your prr,pC'[y for the 701G Estimated Mifket Value-Tni5 4alce 1s•.%lial Ino enl. plk,1_'.e. cnM-)m y[1u[ aSS�SSor S offsue as3rti;f]f PSPimales veur r;e{]erly v.uul:likeiv tell fn+ firslc'o i s.u,s yuu' .c -.. , 0 LL:r, ss,es can •m II1::;p�1 l.,rkei ha rom Vo 3.:^14 leml Cora= nlorrndton`or your .,.,,.r.ti,.'I ti offr:e I>el::.l r:n[hrlr sld�of this noticc. Green Arres - Ai]^I e; class 2a ag ricul[u:aI orJ7,.rlV 1nal 5 face•g ircreas ng '19 Lles r. a IO Sur u u ,d c':ur, rr, .3.d narn hnrrH nmmings iW.1 rr is len In:h.e agric il'v!ral value of vie !�j.l!r:v:ilio^eft]n•Nn ef4 In:115.tAs their concurvs wir'i iani.This')�II:p.iS•-v-rminu-•' by looking a[what s3u•.I'll,s s art cy:or ,tivnla hie Io vo J.Ihp CC31'iCU.tL ra1 I:nLI:s Se lM for in areas -rcaunrl!•I-lets)0,:1 loco'on{s..v.l.be Ind raled on 11hr. eiho:o[hare is no deve nprner•t;;-s.--. Tho laxer Nli+ [f1 ni rh:s r•ry[e or the "]h„r vgl r+ w r^wrfe"u•l:the prorelYv Is n,h, r�.nver ih, Mr 1,iJ�iwi1 ci ri i irrigr--.'I s'I'IES for Formal Appeal Options Intl Or;3u r2 rn If m" oi r•)nCoMG arc not ronolvr•.(l after Homestead Market Value Exclusion-Ai:piies to n-rrlln9 m I h•in!l r a s,a5snr.YOU ha yr nvn formal i.-.peal ;es•.r1e!1[al hnrneti•eadti :-ori to': •ous� garage, e;][Ion S: and Id d .+ �gf.culwial homesteads. Option t-The Boards of Appeal and Equal ixation Trl`•-exc us1o1 s.1 rnxlmurn of 5"n 4f]^.11 W r6,;lur3 of nlarke.jr_I-.e a^c 1I-e.:decreases by 1 1ne t�e:e:enl You illay app•�:rr Lefore elle Boa<ds of:,p,:er'.I and L 'rel uo o� f 5•,e C..O r11i1 oxcl:.s in rt ol�n scs o:It for T.r1;-I..'r. .I 1hl'n.oh a i[!ite r.or thr��.[�'I., Cf:.n':spa�a 1er1�t`,+-1 R^^,rr r•,�r'� �n ur.i•cLel ifJ LI:1 Uy_i'L iflL; r:6 I 1 y[lines 30BZ-[]uali:yirq bu si n ess e&'IA7 hi n a Jno C7-pnnl:n!ry 5n.(:I nr 'I's Grp,on rhe miler•tlP ti rhis imii1.1. ?3p5w*QC Zone n•ay he cli cpole for a pcirtial,)rope: rtV You must have presented your c:Lsc to the Local 'ax�x ern p::n^ F3oard of A p p eat a n d Equa l i zatinn a EF ORE appealing INCLa lmproVemenfs-1 r.1.1.the ussessnr s e511rliale rn[he Cu,In ky$Card ul Ali fle:rl an[)Equal ieatio rl. I of 1hL 'Jalu: of "C:'1 Cr Crr:vl:]util;' ;Il,;issessEC S fen 7.!ocar no.Tri of Rnne. I.and Eaualr�alrnn nnp-overl+ls vnu mad--[C yOL•Dm.,jer[,. Ir ,�i iCve yo,.r va L': 6•a f:al Dir S ,cn'r•ct ,LII Plat Deferment•pa'I.nd"!a'has L•^'.^ ' n!7y. 11.1•t�iring vn::r -as-tc th-Ln-al Bo.:r•d of Np;,ea a!Id p!a:ied fdlv,dec Inton ;.dual lots} :;u! q[ y01 b,Ldl:8I LI:3r1.-o IL•d5L•col ilii c1 your assessu:s rn try fm in;p:o'reC•r:ilh d slruc;ure J[he Increased n12rk�[ve!u� r1rr nlnrm�'7n ,'yO C tv'or rc.w—h:p nr Inn[ser',i;,• dv lu{]al,"1V 15{iflcSEd Il uvi-!-,n, I{ter: Ftnirtl en Ln B•,d rl A ry,.•sl.r.d EtiL I :,•1 s •d•C&e".� he^r.s,p• f'"e ": .s sale befp•w of Lilo c•Il 11 o Q:1—or+uo L, 111 s Iloli:.c,you nwv ap;ea,.I re-I ly41 e JI t3I n erkes �Io Ihe Cn,1r[y;0.1 r-_-of„ppea.and Erivall.�alinn .al,.c'rI Ilie nox w-....�s•nen S rco 2-Coumv Soard vi Amp eat-and Eoualrzafion karat F'::s>_+rve•,2,p c o::•s=2 r r.I.gra-nr land rhll l5;gal`-11 a'-arm horn•ssi•=sd L'1't ii: I 'pfevioudy if Mh Lu�11 fio;l'il or Ar pdal arty EqU dIiL J.WI d:'Ml been arm u„ n r+ru'n"Acle$ If it is I;Onfig anis ro .tir;lvn rorice:rls. vnu mayrlrl l'4 •+ou•rase'e auric::l7urnl land F.rnl:er n•L:ree::Arras This—1., Ilr'co lav 13o^rd cf Ap•:es!In"Ec.Lal•ra[or P case may no;exce..=-d th^G,r—,r i Aures va:ue for'Il ice'a r ds Icon„l�Ih.co 1 []•.,ssp ssc•aprfler:lo:;e1 n rn=.roe:rf T':.'c1x:•s on 1.11 a"er Nue ar•2^ere red so:oacl as or fpn•o•c in orn,3i on +M'r I d rI 211.-es _ Toxahle Mar&et Value T9 s is..._ alae Ihai your Fption 2-Minnesota Tax CouR :ropeny.wc:..r��c:u-1.1.h.ls:dr•.n'lp.,I r�ul:bony 7eperd n•;on the type cf ap,leal may lakr:.o:ir This old House Exclusion-1 his'p'L:•ra 1'.P.xpi'e6 •.1:L![�.:�!Ii I•.r••II I�SnI;311 r;'.illlnti[]I L•.S III'::lr InH i7Fy:Ilar .':the 20C3.ls.5E5rmen; Hp'•V'E'�er,prnr.er[y may r) o'T:lr!'OLI:r YC:u 11Sv! LI II:.I npri!�.p of til`:',•r:lr 5!I I!be re.:e✓nC Ih?vel r".xcl,.s o^Ih•r .3`,idle 2:11 II.''wr.icll i:lxes:I r• {:nyiblC Ip rile:111 I.ri tellµ':Ih the ass u6�rh.'rl'Ql..l p',pe'•`s win 1,Int prOVC n1Cn[5 51rIn.CI'.rns JI•:slnn nr 11r 12. LI!ar L'.-ion of faR .1^1'1 r.Pa�t'f 1:'P rc'marzd fnarYet v.-1,:e by 51.000 C uur[Iter» r.•,�li,•,p,,v,cl.,ss f q L• to 'I'J'•.0 me 0' [he va'.Lle Jef_�ed :r a ria`n of 10+,,,dry.Alli II+ti ulna Fri.-n-,n,p irrrrn•,I l:pr ,n,i,,.;n L'r..::'.n,,sr,ra T:Ix C—rr ;h,-:1,�fo;rcc;var:ra Ir; II:. phone'•1r`1?nf:-r^n':of fn•P,1,Nrlay roll 1'i!]��6?•:::,?9 On ir,c web: -+w.l.Ixc:IUl;.sw�e n,I•us For more information on appeals,visit tho Qeparlarenf of Revenue websire; revenue sra fc-mn.us ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ........ 21 19 City of Centerville Sample - Tax Statement 1 •`.,.. I I r �IllC lalr�.lr.la[r,l'a,lhlr. .. . .. L`riL 1 11,{\11V 111 R1,1 r_' � n.i..,.111 - . . P.cau.a P•e a..ry� L,I. , r..l..,.I�.,Vn.« ',... •:far•a1 eve..,v ._.. TAI,T ATi Y1\1 .....r... ., a[� ��� ]a r'JI\r rL'I•TLr f.-n,r..r.<«M1" f^�J Xw.J'Ar A.,.A..f rn1 .ulrnrvu 5. H 1 ^c1..I r 551• 51' 1, -..S J L... 4.••. 1-^..r t ..... 1ti•.V.i.r,w.l.r.s l,.y.. l., 441.. S- I! 1..1U fFr,tt M11 la\.awtl,fe.LU a,+Iw\51!\Iw'•• -^�� 4 4 t1AId rt%w%1 Ito M5.wi two. T...-i�..i+.1.•....LI-. ...a. bu ...i ,...ya q.11pnmrw d.••h, 1• 51.11:4 1 FWk i'AkyJk-�t�l l b P 11 ANJ.k.Z0116 �����° 1. .h 1-r•. .. sLr I :91 „£ Est Market Value F:= ,31_-3E 3e:Xrr7re0 C} .C% tp AE:EXH:, .:.e A-V 11--2 .T:.,.>,•..:- _.,..... ,r.. r..,,,.€ :f:p?r,} _?:@: K?ti E?I f]1-]r i1-?]:!i,r'13'XF HOrneatsao Market valus Exclucon-A:k I? t.-em 35"tl3 "-:n{e.337:?":l:'"e r 7.-e .v'.,�•:,!� ' ... x.... y3 3^yam _ :1-s� '31-1:'3jfi:_tt C3 _.74=_:e32f T 3 1d%1.^%f'1: �•'T3![ei'.3 "y_Uxsa ez:P r.-2" e"t _(.SL . ex:LE,S'Cra c:L:i]'Lr:[eC?c-,3.e]3:E:' :r n:r2 Taxable,Market value- 4a'--? :"?13x%.2-z-'e7L :h Cl-]l-L:-]1-L111 ]L]f7:1:d.aC ;73-C1 ?%:1_S6"E,e%e7F:OrE 3r]O2Te'13E Property C13E1-t1-?c 3vz,)F'7F?T• ::3EEIh:31^':'?:r3,-nye"31-tj" 7]}G.r F'D:?T, PIN-F':aeT, tl2r:':3t1:"r-nGe- M•7PR- ? T t.1i"r-2K13: '.l tl. � =,. Cf.p?T}3x r_.r]" °0'TO'e :.griCuMral PreaeIVB-]'@]il 3;p 21:]n-'G{O t3".r:Fa-r:eE Ir Cry:z1-^3C'1:L 7.'31 LE91f County,'Munlclp3l Puollc Safety SyefeT-31-3^_:31:!57 *w,Ir1,0E5: "-__=:]1n:r7.e D•]_} :7.r:1"•h':2 Ir Cr.?•':e" .j^ :c.31e1'. Toter_pprowOC Lev1eE-c,'?f f..a:"L 7: 1-9'4'_•13 L3£:?: "EF?:`1-C ts"i�C € T: Other LOCal LBY191-le,'s-.'e:.'rl;*'CT::]7s;1"C re�.i2T?rn 'Epecjl.3%I'_}vrcE T' Other SWIal Taxing Dt5trlctt- "]I cieE-o.E1rC Y� i?�?i?V:�T I•A.Tr 6':?E ^�.F. J1Bt%'=3%A3:2r r13-ag?r'S J** 'I! %.tai 3!235'3,5?3] tree t: Speclaf:.teet.rnentt-:^ar,2E:�ear5T,1^;F:c2fi,]1-.-e i•:r:It}::,.^£r:F-a:723 -r Fro C?f"1?H£EL: 3E r:33 F-3'.1. E-A?! .!s 3.1Jr Cr.: T: Solid Waste Management Charge-A:r3r:elc,!cJarg3ralal m;,. e,:r:parnea r;re ::L"1-p '_42rR5'f:f"1 Y.^ICC 3fe.E2l t.7 F'O:AC:L'0»0 :"23"r 13r131-31-]:,3.2ftt"0_:" n3_l=-:]�ra•C4 GQ".e'EIY.exte"5'c2'a.•:Ir^y eT:� rJ..fe"67 r3'.3'C]lf A321•2::il2r n-. .3r3'.5?e:?:,m-:- 0.:11: € T1 COnteraln dLlOn Td%-3 3X F3:20.^�3r:elE;._'e V2]13:2'.3E 02:2f'Trr eC Fe_-J.1-]I5 ]:r:3f1i-3:20,r L?E"OT Ar•:^3_.E?.':fr:_C:els TIr3U:' € T° PropoBso Property Tax- aT.%r:o}_="O!IrciL7e 3r'.E.?:3'3EE?5ET•3r7E 20 City of Centerville Sample- Back of Tax Statement .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. .. ......... I :!i.11 Pro i -1 0 0; L (I o.. .r L I If^.:r 1[I I), ................................................................................................................................................................................................ ........................................................................................................................................................................................................ 23 21 Annual Housing Market Report — Twin Cities Metro FOR RESIDENTIAL REAL ESTATE ACTIVITY IN THE 16-COUNTY TWIN CITIES REGION MINNEAPOLIS AREA Association fREALTORS' REALTOR Q 24 Annual Housing p Market Report - Twin Cities Metro e3li FOR RESIDENTIAL REAL ESTATE ACTIVITY IN THE 16-COUNTY TWIN CITIES REGION MINNEAPOLIS AREA Association .r REALTORS" Overall, 2017 was a year marked by unprecedented natural List Price Received:Sellers received, on average, 98.3 disasters, shifting political winds, a variety of social percent of their original list price at sale, a year-over-year movements and an ongoing-but perhaps waning- improvement of 0.9 percent.As sales prices are expected to synchronized global economic expansion. In the U.S.,that increase further in 2018,this should bring original list price expansion is now the third longest on record, while the longest received at sale up as well. ever stretch of uninterrupted private job growth was cut short by hurricanes and wildfires. In fact, continued job growth and Known unknowns such as interest rates,the tax bill impact, persistently low unemployment is challenging employers and global growth and political tides are rightfully garnering what's pressuring wages. left of our time-challenged attention span. Rates are upwardly mobile with a data-dependent Federal Reserve, and 30-year But labor isn't the only scarce commodity these days. From mortgage rates could approach the 4.5-5.0 percent range by the humblest crop and fur trades thousands of years ago to year-end. today's highly complex and increasingly automated capital markets, as long as markets have existed, so have shortages The tax bill-a gentle jab in the shoulder here but a real wrench and surpluses. in the spokes on the coasts-diminishes two of the major tax advantages of real estate ownership: interest and tax The U.S. housing market has been short on supply- deductibility. Some of those sins are atoned for by a higher sometimes dramatic in land-constrained, coastal regions with standard deduction and more favorable tax treatment strong labor markets and business growth.The Twin Cities is elsewhere(i.e., pass-through income, 1031 exchanges and a not unique, at least not in this regard. Despite the shortage, corporate rate cut). sales and prices are stomping higher-for now. But nothing goes straight up or down forever. As it turns out, neither party has a monopoly on bad legislation. And speaking of,the party in the White House tends to perform Barring any unforeseen events, expect ongoing but more tepid poorly during midterms. In light of a host of indicators and growth in 2018. Buyers may test sellers' pricing, especially in public sentiment,the 2018 midterms could mark shifting the upper brackets. Supply-demand dynamics favor sellers majorities in one or both legislative chambers. below$500,000, buyers above.The under-$200,000 segment will seemingly continue its vanishing act, with builders unable On a more practical note, prices are likely to rise at a rate of to alleviate the shortage and still pencil out a profit. Meanwhile, 2-3 times inflation. Unit sales may face headwinds if sellers and infill, densification, conversions and in-law suites offer some builders can't increase inventory in the most in-demand price relief. ranges. Days on market and absorption rates are likely to continue to decline as the ratio of sales to list price should rise sales: Pending sales increased slightly by 0.5 percent, further. landing at 61,277 to close out the year. Closed sales increased similarly by 0.2 percent to finish 2017 at 61,168. Healthy fundamentals like consumer confidence, unemployment, GDP, income growth and household formations should have a larger impact on housing than any Listings:Year-over-year,the number of homes available for cryptocurrencies or prefab green construction techniques sale was lower by 27.5 percent.There were 6,830 active you've never heard of.As usual,there's no shortage of listings at the end of 2017. New listings decreased by 2.2 distractions, but market sentiment is mostly positive. Here's to percent to finish the year at 76,159. Home supply was once a prosperous 2018! again lower than desired in 2017. Distressed:The foreclosure market has dwindled from its Table of Contents peak several years ago. In 2017,the percentage of closed 3 Quick Facts sales that were either foreclosure or short sale decreased by 43.4 percent to end the year at 4.2 percent of the market. 5 Property Type Review 6 Distressed Homes Review Prices: Home prices were up compared to last year.The overall median sales price increased 7.0 percent to$246,000 7 New Construction Review for the year. Prices are expected to rise at a slow rate in 2018. $ Area Overviews Single Family home prices were up 6.8 percent compared to last year, and Townhouse-Condo home prices were up 7.2 17 Area Historical Prices percent. 26 Historical Review 25 Current as of January 9,2018.All data from NorthstarMLS.Report©2018 ShowingTime. 2 2017 Annual Housing Market Report-Twin Cities Metro e3ii Quick Facts MINNEAPOLIS AREA Association Rankings include geographies with 15 sales or more.Counties,townships and Minneapolis neighborhoods are not included. REALTORS" New Listings Pending Sales 78,802 58,211 60,987 61,277 77,876 53,509 50,213 76,159 74,899 73,314 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Top 5 Areas:Change in New Listings from 2016 Top 5 Areas:Change in Pending Sales from 2016 Dayton +58.0% Columbus +79.3% Long Lake +37.5% Dellwood +66.7% Saint Francis +33.6% Zumbrota +62.5% Zumbrota +29.3% Bayport +44.7% Columbus +27.3% Dayton +44.0% Bottom 5 Areas:Change in New Listings from 2016 Bottom 5 Areas:Change in Pending Sales from 2016 Cologne -22.1% Hanover -25.3% Clear Lake -23.9% Nowthen -28.3% Nowthen -25.0% New Germany -28.6% Spring Park -25.8% Mora -35.7% Hanover -40.0% Maple Plain -37.0% Closed Sales Inventory of Homes for Sale At the end of the year 53,927 50,357 57,385 61,056 61,168 13,115 13,367 11,509 9,424 6,830 W. i°e °a o 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Top 5 Areas:Change in Closed Sales from 2016 Top 5 Areas:Change in Inventory of Homes for Sale from 2016 Bayport +72.7% Loretto +200.0% Columbus +69.0% Mayer +144.4% Saint Francis +45.5% Zumbrota +133.3% Zumbrota +42.3% Hammond +111.1% Dellwood +41.2% Norwood Young America +95.0% Bottom 5 Areas:Change in Closed Sales from 2016 Bottom 5 Areas:Change in Inventory of Homes for Sale from 2016 Circle Pines -26.1% Minneapolis-Longfellow -66.7% Nowthen -29.8% West Saint Paul -73.5% Mora -31.0% Minneapolis-Phillips -76.9% Marine on St.Croix -31.8% Rockford -80.0% Maple Plain -37.0% Newport -81.8% 26 Current as of January 9,2018.All data from NorthstarMLS.Report©2018 ShowingTime. 1 3 2017 Annual Housing Market Report-Twin Cities Metro e3li Quick Facts MINNEAPOLIS AREA Association Rankings include geographies with 15 sales or more.Counties,townships and Minneapolis neighborhoods are not included. REALTORS" Median Sales Price Average Sales Price $246,000 $293,674 $219,000 $230,000 $261,422 $273,088 $190,000 $205,000 $234 797 $251,017 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Top 5 Areas:Change in Median Sales Price from 2016 Top 5 Areas:Change in Average Sales Price from 2016 Wayzata +72.5% Wayzata +58.2% New Germany +46.9% Long Lake +45.5% Long Lake +37.2% Excelsior +44.0% Spring Park +33.4% Deephaven +33.6% Bayport +28.6% Columbus +29.2% Bottom 5 Areas:Change in Median Sales Price from 2016 Bottom 5 Areas:Change in Average Sales Price from 2016 Independence -7.0% Nowthen -4.6% Greenfield -7.6% Lexington -4.7% Marine on St.Croix -11.1% Zumbrota -8.7% Lake St.Croix Beach -17.4% Independence -14.1% Tonka Bay -19.0% Lake St.Croix Beach -20.2% Cumulative Days on Market Until Sale Percent of Original List Price Received 84 79 76 65 96.0% 95.6% 96.5% 97.4% 98.3% 56 ® ia9 a 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Top 5 Areas:Change in Cumulative Days on Market from 2016 Top 5 Areas:Change in Pct.of Orig.Price Received from 2016 Chisago +38.9% Wayzata +5.0% Columbus +36.7% Long Lake +4.9% Hanover +30.8% Maple Plain +3.9% Isanti +28.6% Minneapolis-Camden +3.3% Lake Elmo +25.7% Somerset +3.2% Bottom 5 Areas:Change in Cumulative Days on Market from 2016 Bottom 5 Areas:Change in Pct.of Orig.Price Received from 2016 Saint Paul-Lexington-Hamline -39.5% Saint Bonifacius -1.1% Long Lake -40.0% Clearwater -1.5% Lakeland -43.9% Zumbrota -1.5% Oak Park Heights -52.0% Greenfield -1.9% Lake St.Croix Beach -59.6% Cokato -2.2% 27 Current as of January 9,2018.All data from NorthstarMLS.Report©2018 ShowingTime. 1 4 2017 Annual Housing Market Report-Twin Cities Metro e3li� Property Type Review MINNEAPOLIS AREA Association Rankings include geographies with 15 sales or more.Counties,townships and Minneapolis neighborhoods are not included. f REALTORS" Top Areas:Townhouse-Condo Attached Market Share in 2017 60 4516-County Twin Cities Region 24.9% Minneapolis-Central 99.8% Saint Paul-Downtown 99.4% Average Cumulative Days on Average Cumulative Days on Minneapolis-University 65.7% Market Single-Family Market Townhouse-Condo Wayzata 58.3% Minneapolis-Calhoun-Isle 55.1% Cumulative Das on Market Until Sale Hugo 53.6% y Spring Park 52.2% This chart uses a rolling 12-month average for each data point. Saint Paul-Summit-University 5019% Single-Family Townhouse-Condo Apple Valley 50.0% 130 Minneapolis-Phillips 49.0% Hopkins 48.5% , 120 Inver Grove Heights 47.0% „o Saint Paul-Summit Hill 45.5% Shakopee 45.2% 00 Oak Park Heights 44.6% 90 Woodbury 44.3% Burnsville 43.4% ao . Maple Grove 43.4% Saint Paul-St.Anthony Park 43.1% 70 Eagan 41.6% 60 Shoreview 41.4% Little Canada 41.0% so , Eden Prairie 39.9% ao Rosemount 39.9% 1-2013 1-2014 1-2015 1-2016 1-2017 Oakdale 39.7% + 6.8% + 7.2% 98.2% 98.6% One-Year Change in Price One-Year Change in Price Pct.of Orig. Price Received Pct.of Orig. Price Received Single-Family Detached Townhouse-Condo Attached Single-Family Detached Townhouse-Condo Attached Median Sales Price Percent of Original List Price Received 2013 ®2014 :'.2015 ®2016 =•.:2017 2013 ®2014 :2015 ®2016 $267K 96.0% 95.5/o 0 96.5% 97.3/ 982/ 96.3% 96.0% 96.6% 97.6/ 986/ ..... $250K ........:::. $235K ...........:i i..... $210K $223K is $185K $159K $165K $173K $146K Single-Family Detached Townhouse-Condo Attached Single-Family Detached Townhouse-Condo Attached 28 Current as of January 9,2018.All data from NorthstarMLS.Report©2018 ShowingTime. 5 2017 Annual Housing Market Report-Twin Cities Metro e3li Distressed Homes Review MINNEAPOLIS AREA Association Rankings include geographies with 15 sales or more.Counties,townships and Minneapolis neighborhoods are not included. REALTORS" Top Areas:Distressed Market Share in 2017 16-County Twin Cities Region 4.2% 4■2% 43■4% Lexington 16.7% Nowthen 12.1% Percent of Closed Sales in One-Year Change in Sales of Pine City 11.9% 2017 That Were Distressed Distressed Properties Saint Paul Park 10>.8✓° Saint Paul-Thomas-Dale(Frogtown) 10.6% Princeton 10.5% Percent of Sales That Were Distressed Rockford 10.3% Newport '> 10>.0% Minneapolis-Near North 9.9% 0 26.5/o Saint Paul-Battle Creek/'Highwood 9.7% 11110 Saint Paul-West Side 9.6% Mora 9.2°% Saint Paul-Payne-Phalen 9.1% 16.6% Saint Paul-Dayton's Bluff 9.1% Falcon Heights 8.6% Saint Paul-North End 8.6% 10.7% Elko New Market 8.4% 0 Saint Paul-Greater East Side 8.3% 7.5% Saint Bonifacius 8.0% 4.2% Circle Pines 8.0% Brooklyn Center 7.9% Crystal 7.8% North Saint Paul 7.7% 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Minneapolis-Camden 7.6% Independence 7.5% + 20.0% + 13.6% + 17.9% + 21 .1 % Three-Year Change in Price Three-Year Change in Price Three-Year Change in Price Three-Year Change in Price All Properties Traditional Properties Short Sales Foreclosures Median Sales Price 2014 ®2015 2016 ®2017 $249,950 $220,000 $227,500 $237,500 $168,500 $180,000 $152,625 $159,900 $164,500 $135,850 $138,228 $147,000 +4.4% +5.4% 'I +6.3% Traditional Short Sales Foreclosures 29 Current as of January 9,2018.All data from NorthstarMLS.Report©2018 ShowingTime. 1 6 2017 Annual Housing Market Report-Twin Cities Metro e3li New Construction Review MINNEAPOLIS AREA Association Rankings include geographies with 15 sales or more.Counties,townships and Minneapolis neighborhoods are not included. f REALTORS" Top Areas:New Construction Market Share in 2017 Mar ' 17 268 16-County Twin Cities Region 7.7% Dayton 67.5% Lake Elmo 56.3% Peak of Drop in New Construction New Germany 41.2% New Construction Inventory Inventory from Peak Wayzata 35.9✓° Cologne 34.0% Minnetrista 30.5% New Construction Homes for Sale Isanti 29.1% Corcoran' 27.5% Victoria 27.1% 2,500 ... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... Otsego 26.0% Mayer 25.0% Delano 24.9% 2,300 Lino Lakes 24.0% Oak Grove 23.7% 2,100 Bayport 22.8% Chisago 22.1% Somerset 21.8% Zimmerman 21.3% 1,900 ,.. Saint Michael 21.1% Lakeville 20.7% Medina 20.6% 1,700 Saint Francis 19.8% North Oaks 19.6% 1,500 Rogers 19.0% 1-2013 1-2014 1-2015 1-2016 1-2017 Carver 18.7% 5.1 1 .0 100.2% 98.1 % Year-End Months Supply Year-End Months Supply Pct.of Orig. Price Received Pct.of Orig. Price Received New Construction Previously Owned New Construction Previously Owned Months Supply of Inventory Percent of Original List Price Received This chart uses a rolling 12-month average for each data point. 2013 ®2014 ':2015 02016 R112017 New Construction Previously Owned 102 6.8 6.4 100% 5.4 5.6 5.1 2.8 3.0 2.1 1.6 1.0 New Construction Previously Owned 1-2013 1-2014 1-2015 1-2016 1-2017 30 Current as of January 9,2018.All data from NorthstarMLS.Report©2018 ShowingTime. 7 2017 Annual Housing Market Report-Twin Cities Metro e2l, Area Overview - Around the Metro MINNEAPOLIS AREA Association °rREALTO RS'° Percent Cumulative Pct.of Orig. Total Change Percent New Townhouse- Percent Days on Price Closed Sales from 2016 Construction Condo Distressed Market Received 16-County Twin Cities Region 61,168 +0.2%r 7.7% 24.9% 4.2% r 56 98.3% 13-County Twin Cities Region 60,125 +0.1% 7.7% 25.2% 4.1% 55 98.4% Afton 35 16.7%'> >2.9% 0.0% 2.9% 139 94.3% Albertville 148 +2.1% 2.7% 16.2% 4.7% 42 99.0% Andover 567 +0.2% >12.9°% 7.8% 3.7% 61 98.6% Annandale 126 +1.6% 4.0% 3.2% 4.0% 94 95.3% Anoka 279 -1.8% 5.7% 14.0% 7.2% 49 99.0% Apple Valley 1,107 -2.9% 8.9% 50.0% 4.2% 41 99.4% Arden Hills ' 122 +34.1% 3.3% ' 20.5% 1.6% ' 48 97.8% Bayport 57 +72.7% 22.8% 7.0% 7.0% 66 96.8% Becker 153 -7.8% 8.5% 7.8% 7.2% 64 97.8% Belle Plaine 183 +1.7% 13.1% 4.9% 5.5% 58 98.1% Bethel 8 -38.5% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% `r 46 1001.6% Big Lake 412 -0.5% 11.2% 5.3% 3.6% 49 99.0% Birchwood Village 8 -11.1% >0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 52 97.5% Blaine 1,298 -3.5% 16.8% 35.7% 4.5% 50 99.3% Bloomington'> 1,258 -2.9% >0.5% 27.3% 3.5% 41 99.0% Bloomington-East 412 0.7% 1.0% 14.1% 4.6% 30 99.8% Bloomington'-West 846 -4.0% 0.2% 33.8% 3.0% 47 98.6% Brainerd MSA 2,092 +5.3% 2.6% 4.7% 5.1% 139 93.9% Brooklyn Center 480 -6.8% 0.2% 11.5% 7.9% 35 99.9% Brooklyn Park 1,271 -8.0% 5.8% 25.9% 5.2% 49 99.3% Buffalo 325 12.4%'r 6.5% 11.7% 4.6% 56 97.9% Burnsville 1,071 +3.0% 1.2% 43.4% 5.5% 44 98.4% Cambridge 317 +16.1% 14.2% 15.5% 6.6% 62 98.2% Cannon Falls 108 +12.5% 3.7% 6.5% 2.8% 93 96.8% Carver 134 -7.6% 18.7% 20.9% 2.2% 50 99..2% Centerville 81 +20.9% 11.1% 21.0% 3.7% 37 98.8% Champlin 454 >+8,6% >9.9°% 25.3% 2.6% 43 99.0°4 Chanhassen 544 +4.2% 6.8% 36.8% 1.8% 55 97.7% Chaska 540 +2.5% 15.6% 33.5% 2.6% 55 98.3% Chisago 104 -20.0% 22.1% 5.8% 5.8% 100 97.9% Circle Pines`r 88 -26.1% 0.0% 37.5% 8.0% `r 36 99.1% Clear Lake 100 4.8% 1.0% 0.0% 3.0% 95 97.0% Clearwater 70 11.4%'> >0.0% 10.0% 7.1% 87 95.8% Coates 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 165 98.9% Cokato 51 10.5%' >0.0% 2.0% 5.9% '> 76 93.0% Cologne 50 0.0% 34.0% 4.0% 2.0% 64 99.4% Columbia Heights 373 -2.1% > >1.1°% 18.5% 6.7% 37 99.8% Columbus 49 +69.0% 6.1% 0.0% 2.0% 82 98.4% Coon Rapids' 1,130 -3.4% 2.6% 32.1% 7.3% 36 99.9% Corcoran 91 +31.9% 27.5% 0.0% 5.5% 76 95.7% Cottage Grove 681 0.0% 8.2% 16.0% 4.1% 39 98.7% Crystal 498 +0.4% 2.2% 4.4% 7.8% 36 99.4% 31 Current as of January 9,2018.All data from NorthstarMLS.Report C 2018 Showin jime. 1 8 2017 Annual Housing Market Report-Twin Cities Metro e2l, Area Overview - Around the Metro MINNEAPOLIS AREA Association °rREALTO RS'° Percent Cumulative Pct.of Orig. Total Change Percent New Townhouse- Percent Days on Price Closed Sales from 2016 Construction Condo Distressed Market Received Dayton 154 +35.1% 67.5% 1.3% 1.9% r 65 98.6% Deephaven 71 +4.4% 1.4% 0.0% 0.0% 80 94.5% Delano 169 +24.3% 24.9% 11.8% 3.6% 74 98.9% Dellwood 24 +41.2% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 133 92.9% Eagan 1,018 -4,6%> 6.2% 41,6% 2.9% 41 98.7% East Bethel 178 -0.6% 11.2% 0.0% 4.5% 70 97.7% Eden Prairie> 1,210 >+3.0% >3.5% 39.9% 3.3% 68 97.4% Edina 1,034 +3.0% 4.8% 29.7% 2.1% 93 96.0% Elk River 592 +18.6% 11.7% ' 24.2% 4.1% ' 51 98.3% Elko New Market 107 +5.9% 10.3% 14.0% 8.4% 73 97.5% Excelsior 29 +3.6% 3.4% 24.1% 0.0% 67 94.6% Falcon Heights 70 +16.7% 1.4% 18.6% 8.6% 59 96.5% Faribault 4119 +17,0% 2.4% 8.8% 7.2% `r 74 97.4% Farmington 600 -0.2% 8.3% 27.3% 4.8% 50 99.2% Forest Lake 415 +4.0% 7.5% 24.6% 3.6% 70 98.0% Fridley 383 +1.1% 0.8% 18.5% 7.3% 37 99.9% Gem Lake 4 +33.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 222 95.6% Golden Valley 422 7.7% 2.6% 14.9% 1.7% 63 98.2% Grant 42 +2.4%; 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 138 94.7% Greenfield 38 +8.6% 2.6% 5.3% 0.0% 97 96.4% Greenwood 10 +25.0% 0.0% 20.0% 0.0% 189 88.1% Ham Lake 234 +8.3% 11.1% 2.1% 5.1% 73 96.7% Hamburg 10 -9.1%`r 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% `r 66 99.5% Hammond 81 +5.2% 7.4% 1.2% 2.5% 79 97.5% Hampton 14 30.0%'> 0.0% 0.0% 14.3% 71 95.0% Hanover 63 -22.2% 15.9% 1.6% 3.2% 68 98.8% Hastings 428 +5.7% 0.9% 32.5% 6.1% 52 97.7% Hilltop 2 +100.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 26 96.6% Hopkins 274 >+1,1% >0.7% 48,5% 6.2% 41 98.5% Hudson 580 -2.0% 15.0% 23.1% 3.3% 88 98.1% Hugo 425 +9.8%' 13.2% 53.6% 3.1% 51 98.7% Hutchinson 308 -2.2% 1.6% 10.4% 4.9% 54 97.8% Independence 53 +3.9%'r 1.9% 0.0% 7.5% 'r 155 95.3% Inver Grove Heights 560 +11.1% 10.7% 47.0% 4.3% 44 98.9% Isanti 265 -2.2% 29.1% 15.8% 3.4% 72 98.7% Jordan 114 -1.7% 10.5% 11.4% 2.6% 56 98.2% Lake Elmo 245 +28,9% 56.3% 24.1% 2.0% 88 97.4% Lake Minnetonka Area 1,101 -0.5% 11.5% 19.1% 3.5% 107 95.5% Lake St.Croix Beach'> 18 +12.5% 0.0% 5.6% 0.0% 38 95.5% Lakeland 34 +21.4% 0.0% 0.0% 2.9% 64 97.4% Lakeland Shores 1' -66.7% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% ' 6 103.2% Lakeville 1,296 -4.3% 20.7% 24.1% 3.1% 59 98.4% Lauderdale 21 22.2°l0' 0.0% 38.1% 0.0% 32 98.7% Lexington 18 -10.0% 5.6% 0.0% 16.7% 33 97.4% 32 Current as of January 9,2018.All data from NorthstarMLS.Report©2018 Showin jime. 1 9 2017 Annual Housing Market Report-Twin Cities Metro e2l, Area Overview - Around the Metro MINNEAPOLIS AREA Association °rREALTO RS'° Percent Cumulative Pct.of Orig. Total Change Percent New Townhouse- Percent Days on Price Closed Sales from 2016 Construction Condo Distressed Market Received Lilydale 12 -29.4% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0°% r 149 92.6% Lindstrom 129 6.5% 16.3% 16.3% 3.1% 76 97.7% Lino Lakes 354 -6.8% 24.0% 22.3% 4.5% 63 98.2% Little Canada 144 -10.0% 5.6% 41.0% 0.7% 55 98.1% Long Lake 30 0.0% 0.0% 23.3% 0.0% 45 98.1% Lonsdale 122 -5.4% 16.4% 2.5% 4.1% 66 98.0% Loretto 17 -5.6% 0.0% 5.9% 0.0% 49 97.8% Mahtomedi 119 +0.8% 1.7% 12.6% 3.4% 76 95.9% Maple Grove' 1,512 +3.4% 7.1% 43.4% 2.7% 46 98.4% Maple Lake 99 +3.1% 5.1% 7.1% 5.1% 63 97.0% Maple Plain 17 37.0% 5.9% 5.9% 5.9% 76 98.1% Maplewood 622 +3.0% 1.3% 27.7% 4.2% 49 98.3% Marine on St'.Croix 15 -31.8% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 169 94.8% Mayer 68 -16.0% 25.0% 4.4% 2.9% 50 99.9% Medicine Lake 2 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 15 97.6% Medina 126 -2.3% 20.6% 18.3% 2.4% 138 95.8% Mendota 0 -- 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0 0.0% Mendota Heights 178 12.3% 7.3% 23.6% 3.4% 78 96.9% Miesville 2 -50.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 50 96.1% Minneapolis-(Citywide) 5,658 -1.0% 2.3% 24.9% 3.7% 43 99.1% Minneapolis-Calhoun-Isle 465 -1.1% 1 1% 55.1% 1.7% 73 962% Minneapolis-Camden 721 +9.9% 2.9% 1.8% 7.6% 45 99.6% Minneapolis Central`r 628 -8.2%`r 4.1% 99.8% 1.4% `r 51 97.6% Minneapolis-Longfellow 358 -7.0% 2.5% 1.7% 3.1% 29 101.2% Minneapolis Near North 382 +17.5%' 2.4% 7.9% 9.9% 52 98.4% Minneapolis-Nokomis 757 -7.8% 0.9% 3.8% 3.0% 30 100.4% Minneapolis Northeast 546 -2.8% 0.5% 7.7% 3.8°10 26 100.8% Minneapolis-Phillips 100 +3.1% 3.0% 49.0% 4.0% 46 100.5% Minneapolis Powderhorn 582 -27% > >1.7% 22.3% 4.3% 35 99.8% Minneapolis-Southwest 903 -0.3% 4.2% 8.6% 1.4% 47 98.3% Minneapolis-University 198 -7.9% 0.0% 65.7% 1.0% 61 96.6% Minnetonka 959 -5.8% 2.2% 34.8% 2.5% 59 97.3% Minnetonka Beach 11 -26.7% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% `r 168 93.2% Minnetrista 177 -7.8% 30.5% 7.3% 4.5% 120 96.0% Monticello 349 +1.2% >14.6% 19.5% 4.3% 45 98.8% Montrose 114 +1.8% 5.3% 7.9% 4.4% 49 98.6% Mora 98 31.0%' 0.0% 3.1% 9.2% 95 95.2% Mound 257 -4.8% 5.1% 19.5% 5.8% 77 96.5% Mounds View 135 -11.2% 6.7% ' 17.8% 3.7% '> 37 99.8% New Brighton 303 -0.7% 1.3% 22.8% 2.3% 37 98.8% New Germany 17 -10.5% 41.2% 0.0% 5.9% 79 99.8% New Hope 328 +3.5% 5.2% 16.2% 5.2% 42 99.0% New Prague 232 +24.7% 17.7% 23.7°/% 6.0% 65 97.9% New Richmond 305 +4.5% 13.1% 10.2% 2.0% 89 97.6% 33 Current as of January 9,2018.All data from NorthstarMLS.Report©2018 Showinjime. 1 10 2017 Annual Housing Market Report-Twin Cities Metro e2l, Area Overview - Around the Metro MINNEAPOLIS AREA Association °rREALTO RS'° Percent Cumulative Pct.of Orig. Total Change Percent New Townhouse- Percent Days on Price Closed Sales from 2016 Construction Condo Distressed Market Received New Trier 2 -- 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 'r 33 93.5% Newport 50 +19.0% 8.0% 4.0% 10.0% 57 98.0% North Branch 262 -2.2% >9.9% 6.5% 4.6% 61 97.9% North Oaks 107 +0.9% 19.6% 21.5% 0.9% 135 94.6% North Saint Paul 181 -7,2% 1.1% 5.5% 7.7% 39 98.9% Northfield 314 +0.6% 3.8% 29.6% 1.6% 77 97.2% Norwood Young America 84 -9.7% > >7.1% 7.1% 7.1% 61 97.0% Nowthen 33 -29.8% 3.0% 0.0% 12.1% 74 98.8% Oak Grove ' 152 +24.6% 23.7% 1.3% 4.6% ' 75 97.8% Oak Park Heights 65 +12.1% 0.0% 44.6% 3.1% 49 96.7% Oakdale 516 -6.7% 0.6% 39.7% 5.2% 43 98.8% Orono 204 +15.9% 8.3% 17.2% 4.4% 134 94.0% Osseo 26 -10.3% 0.0% 3.8% 0.0% 'r 37 99.2% Otsego 511 -1.0% 26.0% 32.7% 3.5% 46 99.0% Pine City 11'$ 23.4%'> 4.2% 0.8% 11.9% 77 94.3% Pine Springs 7 +75.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 141 96.7% Plymouth 1,463 -3.2% > >12.7% 35.8% 3.1% 60 98.0% Princeton 238 +2.6% 4.2% 8.8% 10.5% 61 98.2% Prior Lake 592 -7.5% 5.1% 31.6% 3.7% 62 97.9% Ramsey 567 +9.2% 13.4% 31.7% 3.7% 45 99.2% Randolph 7 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 63 94.5% Red Wing 267 -12.7% 2.6% 9.4% 7.5% 83 96.6% Richfield 617 -1.1%`r 0.8% 8.6% 4.2% `r 29 99.9% River Falls 287 -3.4% 7.3% 14.6% 3.5% 94 97.4% Robbinsdale> 322 -3.0% 0.0% 10.6% 4.0% 37 98,5% Rockford 68 +17.2% 2.9% 19.1% 10.3% 53 98.8% Rogers 210 -0.9% 19.0% 27.6% 2.9% 56 98.1% Rosemount 504 1.6% 13.3% 39.9% 3.0% 46 98.5% Roseville 5117 >+0,2%> >4.1% 26,7% 1.7% 43 98.9°4 Rush City 62 11.4% 11.3% 4.8% 1.6% 63 98.1% Saint Anthony 134 +11.7% 0.7% 37.3% 0.0% 45 97.4% Saint Bonifacius 50 -3.8% 0.0% 18.0% 8.0% 48 96.4% Saint Cloud MSA 2,649 +0.3% 4.1% 4.9% 5.7% `r 81 96.3% Saint Francis 227 +45.5% 19.8% 17.2% 4.8% 56 98.7% Saint Louis Park 956 -5.4% 1.0% 31.1% 2.2% 38 98.5% Saint Mary's Point 5 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 140 93.4% Saint Michael 383 +7.3% 21.1% 21.4% 2.6% 52 98.2% Saint Paul 3,841 -1.6% 1.1% 15.2% 6.2% 52 98.3% Saint Paul-Battle Creek/Highwood 259 >+3.2%> >0.0°% 6.6% 9.7% 45 98.9% Saint Paul-Como Park 241 -9.4% 0.0% 3.7% 4.1% 40 98.6% Saint Paul-Dayton's Bluff 197 -1.5% 0.0% 2.0% 9.1% 56 96.8% Saint Paul-Downtown 179 +1.1% 0.0% 99.4% 1.7% 83 96.8% Saint Paul-Greater East Side 472 +4.9% 1.1% 1.9% 8.3% 49 98.6% Saint Paul-Hamline-Midway 161 -10.1% 0.0% 0.0% 6.2% 35 99.8% 34 Current as of January 9,2018.All data from NorthstarMLS.Report©2018 Showin jime. 1 11 2017 Annual Housing Market Report-Twin Cities Metro e2l, Area Overview - Around the Metro MINNEAPOLIS AREA Association °rREALTO RS'° Percent Cumulative Pct.of Orig. Total Change Percent New Townhouse- Percent Days on Price Closed Sales from 2016 Construction Condo Distressed Market Received Saint Paul-Highland Park 339 13.5%r 3.2% 14.5% 2.7% r 51 98.3% Saint Paul-Merriam Park/Lexington-Ham line 154 12.0% 0.6% 7.8% 4.5% 46 98.8% Saint Paul-Macalester-Groveland 298 19.7%'> 1.3% 8.4% 3.0% 51 98.2% Saint Paul-North End 257 +3.2% 0.8% 6.6% 8.6% 47 99.0% Saint Paul-Payne-Phalen 383 +4.6% 2.3% 1.0% 9.1% 48 98.2% Saint Paul-St.Anthony Park 72 -4.0% 1.4% 43.1% 0.0% 64 97.0% Saint Paul-Summit Hill 99 +8.8% 2.0°% 45.5% 2.0% '> 71 972% Saint Paul-Summit-University 232 +23.4% 1.3% 50.9% 1.7% 86 97.0% Saint Paul-Thomas-Dale(Frogtown) 123 -8.9% 0.8% 3.3% 10.6% 55 97.8% Saint Paul-West Seventh 178 +9.2% 1.1% 28.1% 6.2% 40 99.4% Saint Paul-West Side 197 +13.9% 0.5% 6.6% 9.6% 50 98.1% Saint Paul Park 93 +2.2% 3.2% 7.5% 10.8% 38 99.0% Savage 627 -3,2%`r 12.0% 27.1% 1.8% `r 47 99.2% Scandia 48 +37.1% 12.5% 0.0% 2.1% 123 94.9% Shakopee 807 -1.2% >2.4% 45.2% 4.0% 47 98.6% Shoreview 457 -2.4% 1.1% 41.4% 2.2% 45 98.6% Shorewood 124 -7.5% 3.2% 17.7% 0.8% 110 94.6% Somerset 124 +10.7% 21.8% 5.6% 4.8% 82 99.9% South Haven60 +20.0% 0.0% 3.3% 1.7% 173 94.0% South Saint Paul 359 +6.5% 0.3% 3.9% 7.0% 43 98.7% Spring Lake Park 97 +7,8% 0.0% 15.5°% 6.2% 42 99.5% Spring Park 23 0.0% 4.3% 52.2% 0.0% 75 94.6% Stacy 78 +23.8% 12.8% 6.4% 3.8% `r 57 98.8% Stillwater 406 +1.0% 7.1% 21.9% 2.2% 74 97.4% Sunfish Lake> 7 +133.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 233 88,7% Tonka Bay 29 +3.6% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 118 95.3% Vadnais Heights 227 +7.1% 1.8% 39.6% 6.2% 52 98.9% Vermillion 5 +66.7% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 42 97.6% Victoria 262 >+25.4%> 27.1% 14.5% 3.1% 87 97.9°4 Waconia 275 -7.7% 6.5% 29.8% 2.9% 53 98.1% Watertown 105 +5.0% 17.1% 9.5% 1.9% 67 97.9% Wayzata 103 +3.0% 35.9% 58.3% 1.9% 144 97.1% West Saint Paul 3118 +10.4% 0.6% 19.5% 7.5% `r 46 98.0% White Bear Lake 393 0.8% 0.5% 21.9% 6.6% 43 98.2% Willernie 14 +27.3% 0.0% 7.1'°% 0.0% 65 98.7% Woodbury 1,545 +0.2% 14.0% 44.3% 2.4% 54 98.4% Woodland 12 +20,0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 290 92.1% Wyoming 134 +3.1% 9.7% 8.2% 1.5% 47 97.9% Zimmerman'> 348 +7.1% 21.3% 7.2% 5.2% '> 59 98.4% Zumbrota 37 +42.3% 5.4% 2.7% 2.7% 91 95.5% 35 Current as of January 9,2018.All data from NorthstarMLS.Report©2018 Showinjime. 1 12 2017 Annual Housing Market Report-Twin Cities Metro e2l, Area Overview - Minneapolis Neighborhoods MINNEAPOLIS AREA Association °rREALTO RS'° Percent Cumulative Pct.of Orig. Total Change Percent New Townhouse- Percent Days on Price Closed Sales from 2016 Construction Condo Distressed Market Received Minneapolis r 5,658 -1.0%' 2.3% 24.9% 3.7% 43 99.1% Armatage 117 18.2% 3.4% 0.0% 0.9% 31 98.8% Audubon Park 105 -6.3% 1.0% 0.0% 3.8% 28 101.2% Bancroft 65 -9.7% 1.5% 16.9% 4.6% 44 99.6% Beltrami 16 +77,8% >12.5% 0.0% 6.3% 20 102.9% Bottineau 15 -16.7% 0.0% 13.3% 0.0% 32 101.9% Bryant 38 -22.4% >2.6% 0.0% 2.6% 41 98.6% Bryn Mawr 50 -23.1% 2.0% 14.0% 4.0% 53 97.1% Calhoun(CARAG) 67 -1.5% 0.0% 56.7% 1.5% 58 98.6% Cedar-Isles-Dean 61 -16.4% 3.3% 52.5% 1.6% 69 94.2% Cedar-Riverside 19 29.6%`% 0.0% 100.0% 5.3% 32 98.5% Central 71 +57.8% 4.2% 11.3% 5.6% 34 100.3% Cleveland 103 +9,6% 1.9% 0.0% 5.8% `r 43 1001.6% Columbia Park 38 +11.8% 0.0% 0.0% 5.3% 27 100.8% Cooper 62 +21.6% 3.2% 0.0% 1.6% 33 101`.6% Corcoran Neighborhood 49 -19.7% 0.0% 6.1% 4.1% 23 100.2% Diamond Lake 110 +18.3% 0.0% 1.8% 4.5% 38 100.0% Downtown East-Mpls 74 -7.5% 2.7% 100.0% 0.0% 51 97.0% Downtown West-Mels 120 -15.5% 0.0% 100.0% 2.5% 42 96.9% East Calhoun(ECCO) 39 +50.0% 0.0% 38.5% 2.6% 94 96.2% East Harriet 67 +48.9% 1.5% 23.9% 1.5% 71 96.5% East Isles 50 +8.7% 0.0% 56.0% 0.0% 69 96.9% East Phillips`r 31 +40.9% 3.2% 25.8% 6.5% `r 27 1031.4% Elliot Park 106 -0.9% 21.7% 100.0% 0.0% 53 99.1% Ericsson 46 -37.8% 0.0% 0.0% 2.2% 15 102.7% Field 52 +2.0% 3.8% 0.0% 3.8% 30 99.9% Folwell 135 +25.0% 0.0% 8.1% 13.3% 57 98..6% Fulton 152 +10.1% 12.5% 1.3% 1.3% 66 98.0% Hale 60 >+7,1% 1.7% 0.0% 0.0% 24 100,2% Harrison 20 +25.0% 0.0% 5.0% 0.0% 27 98.8% Hawthorne 58 +93.3% 5.2% 5.2% 5.2% 53 99.2% Hiawatha 82 -11.8% 4.9% 1.2% 3.7% 24 101.5% Holland 41 16.3%`r 0.0% 7.3% 9.8% `r 31 99.8% Howe 116 15.3% 2.6% 0.0% 2.6% 29 101.1% Jordan Neighborhood' 116 +28.9% 3.4% 0.0% 9.5% 63 98.8% Keewaydin 58 -22.7% 0.0% 3.4% 3.4% 19 100.6% Kenny 91 +13,8% 0.0% 1.1% 2.2% 26 99.5% Kenwood 28 +21.7% 0.0% 17.9% 0.0% 160 90.5% Kenyon 38 +15.2% >2.6% 7.9% 2.6% 92 96.4% King Field 129 +17.3% 0.0% 19.4% 3.1% 30 101.2% Lind-Bohanon 114 -0.9% 14.0% 0.9% 3.5% ' 40 100.8% Linden Hills 136 -8.7% 5.1% 20.6% 0.0% 58 96.2% Logan Park 12 36.8%' 0.0% 25.0% 0.0% 18 102.5% Longfellow 55 6.8% 0.0% 1.8% 5.5% 36 100.5% 36 Current as of January 9,2018.All data from NorthstarMLS.Report©2018 Showin jime. 1 13 2017 Annual Housing Market Report-Twin Cities Metro e2l, Area Overview - Minneapolis Neighborhoods MINNEAPOLIS AREA Association °rREALTO RS'° Percent Cumulative Pct.of Orig. Total Change Percent New Townhouse- Percent Days on Price Closed Sales from 2016 Construction Condo Distressed Market Received Loring Park r 116 +6.4%r 0.9% 100.0% 0.9% r 70 96.8% Lowry Hill 66 +11.9% 3.0% 63.6% 3.0% 85 94.8% Lowry Hill East 64 +25.5% 0.0% 79.7% 0.0% 53 97.7% Lyndale 63 -7.4% 1.6% 54.0% 4.8% 37 99.1% Lynnhurst 87 16.3%'> 6.9% 0.0% 0.0% 57 98.3% Marcy Holmes 42 0.0% 0.0% 90.5% 2.4% 66 95.5% Marshall Terrace 26 +62.5% 0.0% 3.8% 7.7% 28 1001.9% McKinley 54 +14.9% 0.0% 0.0% 13.0% 39 98.8% Midtown Phillips 40 -18.4% 5.0% 60.0% 5.0% 34 101.4% Minnehaha 82 -17.2% 0.0% 22.0% 3.7% 32 99.1% Morris Park 80 +8.1% 0.0% 0.0% 3.8% 36 99.7% Near North 42 4.5% 0.0% 21.4% 7.1% 52 96.1% Nicollet Island-East Bank 54 -20.6% 0.0% 98.1% 0.0% 54 97.8% North Loop 158 -17.3% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 38 98.1% Northeast Park 13 +30.0% 0.0% 7.7% 0.0% 28 100.2% Northrop 92 -14.0% 1.1% 2.2% 0.0% 23 101.9% Page 28 15.2%> >0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 37 97.3% Phillips West 16 +100.0% 0.0% 75.0% 0.0% 103 95.8% Powderhorn Park 72 -1.4% 0.0% 11.1% 1.4% 20 102.2% Prospect Park-East River Road 36 -5.3% 0.0% 55.6% 0.0% 95 96.2% Regina 49 14.0%' 0.0% 10.2% 8.2% 36 101,1% Seward 43 4.4% 0.0% 9.3% 2.3% 22 101.6% Sheridan 24 +33.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% `r 20 98.8% Shingle Creek 83 +76.6% 1.2% 0.0% 6.0% 32 100.0% Southeast Como 47 +17.5%' 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 49 95.9% St.Anthony East 32 +39.1% 0.0% 53.1% 3.1% 28 100.8% St.Anthony West 16 23.8%I 0.0% 75.0% 0.0% 13 101.2% Standish 148 +5.7% 2.7% 4.1% 4.7% 26 101.2% Stevens Square-Loring Heights 54 -1.8% > >0.0% 98.1% 9.3% 71 96.7% Sumner-Glenwood 18 -33.3% 0.0% 94.4% 5.6% 43 98.0% Tangletown 73 -2.7% 0.0% 6.8% 1.4% 39 96.6% University of Minnesota 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0 0.0% Ventura Village 13 -27.8% 0.0% 38.5% 0.0% 'r 65 96.1% Victory 128 16.3% 0.0% 0.0% 4.7% 39 100.1% Waite Park 145 -11.6% 0.0% 0.0% 2.1% 24 100.9% Webber-Camden 104 +13.0% 1.9% 1.0% 8.7% 60 98.1% Wenonah 100 -2,0% 3.0°% 0.0% 3.0% 34 100.5% West Calhoun 40 -32.2% 0.0% 95.0% 2.5% 66 96.6% Whittier 76 -15.6% >0.0% ' 78.9% 5.3% '> 65 95.8% Willard-Hay 128 +8.5% 1.6% 0.0% 15.6% 47 98.3% Windom 51 -17.7% 2.0% 2.0% 3.9% ' 41 99.9% Windom Park 63 -8.7% 0.0% 4.8% 6.3% 26 100.6% 37 Current as of January 9,2018.All data from NorthstarMLS.Report©2018 Showin jime. 1 14 2017 Annual Housing Market Report-Twin Cities Metro e2l, Area Overview - Townships MINNEAPOLIS AREA Association °rREALTO RS'° Percent Cumulative Pct.of Orig. Total Change Percent New Townhouse- Percent Days on Price Closed Sales from 2016 Construction Condo Distressed Market Received Baytown Township 21 -8.7% 28.6% 0.0% 0.0% r 143 97.8% Belle Plaine Township 1 -80.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 36 97.5% Benton Township 1 -50.0%'r 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 'r 18 1021.8% Blakeley Township 1 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 133 90.8% Camden Township 0 -- 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0 0.0% Castle Rock Township 5 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 117 94.9% Cedar Lake Township> 17 >-10.5%> >0.0% 5.9% 5.9% 121 90.9% Credit River Township 45 32.4% 8.9% 0.0% 8.9% 150 95.4% Dahlgren Township 2 -50.0%' 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 14 98.1% Douglas Township 3 50.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 19 101.4% Empire Township 22 -21.4% 27.3% 50.0% 4.5% 22 10014% Eureka Township 8 -11.1% 0.0% 0.0% 12.5% 74 96.6% Greenvale Township r 1 -66.7%`r 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% `r 138 1001.4% Grey Cloud Island Township 5 66.7% 0.0% 0.0% 20.0% 88 101.1% Hancock Township 0 -- 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0 0.0% Hassan Township 0 -- 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0 0.0% Helena Township 3 50.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 80 91.5% Hollywood Township 1 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 62 100.3% Jackson Township 11 266.7% 0.0% 0.0% 9.1% 108 94.9% Laketown Township 13 30.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 134 93.9% Linwood Township 60 -3.2% 10.0% 0.0% 10.0% 70 972% Louisville Township 3 200.0% 0.0% 0.0% 66.7% 54 86.5% Marshan Township 2 0.0% `r 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% `r 88 95.9% May Township 21 23.5% 4.8% 0.0% 4.8% 147 97.2% New Market Township 15 16.7%' 0.0% 0.0% 13.3% 124 97.1% Nininger Township 2 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 149 100.0% Randolph Township 2 -- 50.0% 0.0% 0.0% 42 97.2% Ravenna Township 14 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 7.1% 43 100.5% San>Francisco Township 3 ,200.0%> >0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 20 99.6% Sand Creek Township 4 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 47 97.8% Sciota Township 0 -- 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0 0.0% Spring Lake Township 16 33.3% 0.0% 0.0% 6.3% 110 97.9% St.Lawrence Township 1'r 0.0% `r 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% `r 327 95.4% Stillwater Township 12 42.9% 0.0% 0.0% 8.3% 134 92.1% Vermillion Township 'r 2 -50.0%'r 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 53 95.7% Waconia Township 5 -16.7% 0.0% 0.0% 20.0% 44 95.7% Waterford Township 2 100.0%'> 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 143 1022% Watertown Township 1 -50.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 39 94.3% West Lakeland Township 42 -8.7% > >4.8% 0.0% 2.4% 105 96.4% White Bear Township 215 11.4% 6.5% 25.1% 1.4% 45 98.7% Young America Township 1' -66.7%' 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 56 98.6% 38 Current as of January 9,2018.All data from NorthstarMLS.Report©2018 Showinjime. 1 15 2017 Annual Housing Market Report-Twin Cities Metro e2l, Area Overview - Counties MINNEAPOLIS AREA Association -rREALTO RS'° Percent Cumulative Pct.of Orig. Total Change Percent New Townhouse- Percent Days on Price Closed Sales from 2016 Construction Condo Distressed Market Received Anoka County 6,201 >+0.6% >10.5% 22.9% 5.5% 50 99.1% Carver County 2,107 +1.3% 14.2% 26.1% 2.7% 59 98.1% Chisago County 1,017 -2.8% 11.9% 6.8% 4.6% 70 98.0% Dakota County 7,582 +0.2% 8.5% 35.4% 4.4% 48 98.6% Goodhue County 509 -4.9% 2.9% 8.3% 5.3% 90 96.3% Hennepin County 20,685 -1.1% 5.1% 26.7% 3.6% 54 98.3% Isanti County 809 +6.0%; 16.7% 11.4% 6.6% 67 98.4% Kanabec County 228 -13.6% 0.4% 1.3% 11.8% 91 94.6% Mille Lacs County 467 -1.7% 'r 1.9% 9.4% 7.9% 'r 114 94.7% Ramsey County 7,391 -0.5% 2.0% 21.4% 4.9% 50 98.3% Rice County 916 +3.2% 5.8% 15.0% 4.5% 74 97.3% Scott County 2,678 -2.0% 7.3% 29.0% 4.0% 57 98.3% Sherburne County 1,915 +4.8% 11.7% 11.0% 5.0% 58 98.2% St.Croix County 1,580 +1.2% 13.2% 13.0% 3.5% 88 97.7% Washington County 4,983 +3.0% 11.4% 30.8% 3.3% 60 98.0% Wright County 2,690 +0.8% 14.4% 16.5% 4.0% 58 98.1% 39 Current as of January 9,2018.All data from NorthstarMLS.Report©2018 Showinjime. 1 16 2017 Annual Housing Market Report-Twin Cities Metro e3li Median Prices - Around the Metro MINNEAPOLIS AREA Association �r REALTORS" Change Change 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 From 2016 From 2013 16-County Twin Cities Region $190,000 $205,000 $219,000 $230,000 $246,000 +7.0% +29.5% r 13-County Twin Cities Region $192,000 $205,600 $220,000 $232,000 $247,900 +6.9% +29.1% Afton $409,500 $412,375 $435,000> $452,500 $431,000 -4.8% +5.3% Albertville $178,900 $179,900 $210,000 $225,000 $239,900 +6.6% +34.1% Andover $227,491 $236,700 $247,500> $268,000 $290,000 +8.2% +27.5% Annandale $159,000 $172,221 $204,450 $205,000 $222,400 +8.5% +39.9% Anoka $146,950 $166,000 $178,950> $195,000 $207,000 +6.2% +40.9% Apple Valley $195,000 $213,000 $224,900 $229,900 $245,800 +6.9% +26.1% Arden Hills $300,300 $252,000 $282,000 $299,000 $301;000 +0.7% +0.2% Bayport $200,000 $237,450 $207,000 $233,250 $300,000 +28.6% +50.0% Becker $155,900 $169,900 $183,900`r $193,250 $211,450 +9.4% +35.6% Belle Plaine $159,000 $187,700 $193,250 $207,050 $225,000 +8.7% +41.5% Bethel $135,000 $115,000 $158,185`r $199,450 $205,500 +3.0% +52.2% Big Lake $154,500 $169,900 $178,000 $200,000 $210,000 +5.0% +35.9% Birchwood Village $287,375 $340,000 $260,000' $289,000 $340,000 +17.6% +18.3% Blaine $199,200 $218,665 $220,000 $230,000 $242,643 +5.5% +21.8% Bloomington'> $193,100 $201,000 $218,000> $232,000 $250,000 +7.8% +29.5% Bloomington-East $169,000 $182,000 $198,250 $210,000 $232,000 +10.5% +37.3% Bloomington'-West $215,000 ; $225,000 $235,000' $250,000 $264,750 +5.9% +23.1% Brainerd MSA $161,000 $165,000 $170,000 $182,000 $194,000 +6.6% +20.5% Brooklyn Center $122,000 $139,950 $154,900 $1615,000 $186,125 +12.8% +52.6% Brooklyn Park $167,000 $174,900 $194,000 $214,200 $229,900 +7.3% +37.7% Buffalo $171,810 $175,000 $200,000`r $204,900 `r $234,000 +14.2% +36.2% Burnsville $185,000 $209,500 $222,000 $234,950 $244,550 +4.1% +32.2% Cambridge $127,000 $148,250 $163,500' $169,900 $190,500 +12.1% +50.0% Cannon Falls $177,500 $166,100 $193,000 $205,000 $234,900 +14.6% +32.3% Carver $282,500 $270,000 $277,750' $296,090 $345,000 +16.5% +22.1% Centerville $189,950 $197,500 $223,000 $235,000 $243,000 +3.4% +27.9% Champlin $182,500 $193,950 $205,000> $224,000 $239,000 +6.7% +31.0% Chanhassen $305,000 $318,838 $325,000 $336,950 $346,950 +3.0% +13.8% Chaska $252,000 $235,000 $255,000 $272,500 $293,000 +7.5% +16.3% Chisago $199,850 $201,500 $235,000 $250,000 $255,000 +2.0% +27.6% Circle Pines`r $144,150 $154,000 $162,550`r $180,000 `r $191,050 +6.1% +32.5% Clear Lake $160,375 $154,500 $185,000 $177,000 $214,900 +21.4% +34.0% Clearwater $160,000 $159,500 $157,500> $190,000 $182,500 -3.9% +14.1% Coates $0 $0 $161,625 $0 $112,500 Cokato $129,900 $123,200 $132,450> $159,550 $157,000 -1.6% +20.9% Cologne $181,500 $262,950 $250,000 $240,000 $293,313 +22.2% +61.6% Columbia Heights $132,000 $140,000 $158,125> $173,950 $190,000 +9.2% +43.9% Columbus $202,800 $227,500 $236,300 $263,000 $277,500 +5.5% +36.8% Coon Rapids; $150,000 $160,300 $175,000' $190,000 $204;000 +7.4% +36.0% Corcoran $300,000 $312,500 $330,000 $378,000 $431,200 +14.1% +43.7% Cottage Grove $194,000 $209,900 $222,000' $240,000 $250,000 +4.2% +28.9% Crystal $149,250 $157,500 $172,000 $185,450 $200,900 +8.3% +34.6% 40 Current as of January 9,2018.All data from NorthstarMLS.Report C 2018 ShowingTime. 1 17 2017 Annual Housing Market Report-Twin Cities Metro e3i, Median Prices - Around the Metro MINNEAPOLIS AREA Association �r REALTORS" Change Change 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 From 2016 From 2013 Dayton $274,000 $218,250 $328,709r $358,123 $425,195 +18.7% +55.2% Deephaven $518,500 $585,000 $622,500 $581,000 $689,000 +18.6% +32.9% Delano $232,870 $241,250 $275,100> $280,000 $295,000 +5.4% +26.7% Dellwood $507,500 $765,000 $594,215 $532,000 $600,000 +12.8% +18.2% Eagan $220,000 $234,700 $243,274> $259,000 $267,500 +3.3% +21.6% East Bethel $179,900 $198,000 $219,500 $237,500 $253,250 +6.6% +40.8% Eden Prairie> $279,294 $300,000 $299,900> $308,500 $329,500 +6.8% +18.0% Edina $350,000 $380,000 $397,000 $435,010 $461,000 +6.0% +31.7% Elk River $172,000 $195,000 $215,500 $230,500 $245;000 +6.3% +42.4% Elko New Market $247,627 $257,520 $264,250 $305,000 $300,000 -1.6% +21.1% Excelsior $409,750 $452,500 $502,500 $502,000 $529,500 +5.5% +29.2% Falcon Heights $238,000 $257,450 $257,000 $288,800 $270,000 -6.5% +13.4% Faribault $135,000 $135,250 $143,450`r $158,700 $175,000 +10.3% +29.6% Farmington $192,500 $210,000 $220,000 $229,900 $251,450 +9.4% +30.6% Forest Lake $191,500 $219,900 $225,500' $230,000 $250,500 +8.9% +30.8% Fridley $154,250 $160,000 $175,000 $187,800 $199,900 +6.4% +29.6% Gem Lake $169,450 $563,864 $411,000> $205,000 $617,500 +201.2% +264.4% Golden Valley $246,000 $247,500 $264,900 $290,275 $314,000 +8.2% +27.6% Grant $415,500 $445,000 $399,900' $404,650 $472,000 +16.6% +13.6% Greenfield $354,000 $486,500 $405,000 $427,965 $395,250 -7.6% +11.7% Greenwood $921,500 $747,500 $965,000' $1,233,450 $1,227;350 -0.5% +33.2% Ham Lake $271,600 $289,900 $297,500 $319,000 $329,900 +3.4% +21.5% Hamburg $95,500 $138,000 $119,900`r $186,000 `r $197,750 +6.3% +107.1% Hammond $145,000 $163,000 $160,950 $174,000 $213,500 +22.7% +47.2% Hampton $204,000 $200,000 $233,000> $233,900 $253,750 +8.5% +24.4% Hanover $239,950 $254,313 $266,250 $289,950 $309,730 +6.8% +29.1% Hastings $169,900 $182,250 $196,000' $206,000 $205,000 -0.5% +20.7% Hilltop $34,500 $47,500 $0 $56,000 $71,250 +27.2% +106.5% Hopkins $180,500 $182,000 $213,500> $215,000 $219,400 +2.0% +21.6% Hudson $228,500 $233,500 $262,000 $263,000 $294,361 +11.9% +28.8% Hugo $195,000 $180,000 $204,500' $230,900 $233,200 +1.0% +19.6% Hutchinson $125,000 $142,900 $145,000 $147,700 $161,000 +9.0% +28.8% Independence $411,500 $424,950 $525,000r $535,000 $497,684 -7.0% +20.9% 'r Inver Grove Heights $194,950 $180,000 $193,500 $216,000 $229,999 +6.5% +18.0% Isanti $125,000 $149,900 $158,500> $177,900 $189,950 +6.8% +52.0% Jordan $215,000 $209,000 $247,000 $255,000 $265,000 +3.9% +23.3% Lake Elmo $374,900 $428,500 $401,000> $406,550 $432,500 +6.4% +15.4% Lake Minnetonka Area $369,950 $380,000 $395,000 $398,750 $450,000 +12.9% +21.6% Lake St.Croix Beach> $139,000 $176,250 $187,250> $220,900 $182,500 -17.4% +31.3% Lakeland $204,990 $223,000 $244,000 $255,000 $276,500 +8.4% +34.9% Lakeland Shores $265,000 ;$1,500;000 $247,423' $278,500 $800;000 +187.3% +201.9% Lakeville $258,000 $272,000 $299,000 $307,125 $324,900 +5.8% +25.9% Lauderdale $175,000 $117,750 $175,000`r $187,500 $196,000 +4.5% +12.0% Lexington $149,900 $181,920 $172,862 $200,775 $202,605 +0.9% +35.2% 41 Current as of January 9,2018.All data from NorthstarMLS.Report©2018 ShowingTime. 1 18 2017 Annual Housing Market Report-Twin Cities Metro e3li Median Prices - Around the Metro MINNEAPOLIS AREA Association �r REALTORS" Change Change 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 From 2016 From 2013 Lilydale $200,250 $280,000 $240,000r $212,500 $292,750 +37.8% +46.2% Lindstrom $160,025 $179,999 $190,000 $211,814 $225,000 +6.2% +40.6% Lino Lakes $229,900 $243,000 $254,600> $274,900 $304,500 +10.8% +32.4% Little Canada $185,500 $192,593 $206,250 $219,000 $248,750 +13.6% +34.1% Long Lake $231,500 $212,250 $269,950> $245,025 $336,250 +37.2% +45.2% Lonsdale $171,900 $183,000 $211,300 $222,222 $234,950 +5.7% +36.7% Loretto $199,900 $156,900 $256,000> $226,250 $290,000 +28.2% +45.1% Mahtomedi $245,000 $301,450 $325,000 $306,910 $328,500 +7.0% +34.1% Maple Grove $233,000 $245,500 $245,000' $256,700 $274;025 +6.7% +17.6% Maple Lake $145,000 $167,000 $170,000 $177,500 $195,000 +9.9% +34.5% Maple Plain $178,750 $212,500 $243,900' $253,000 $271;750 +7.4% +52.0% Maplewood $165,000 $182,000 $187,500 $199,900 $219,999 +10.1% +33.3% Marine on St.Croix $320,000 $322,450 $320,000`r $376,825 $335,000 -11.1% +4.7% Mayer $189,900 $190,000 $212,000 $224,950 $239,000 +6.2% +25.9% Medicine Lake $542,000 $465,000 $836,250' $657,500 $677,500 +3.0% +25.0% Medina $521,623 $527,500 $555,047 $541,250 $640,000 +18.2% +22.7% Mendota $287,000 $78,000 $0 $221,000 $0 -100.0% -100.0% Mendota Heights $282,500 $330,000 $339,649 $360,000 $389,450 +8.2% +37.9% Miesvitle $231,671 $205,000 $0 $274,000 $217;500 -20.6% -6.1% Minneapolis-(Citywide) $189,000 $205,000 $220,000 $230,000 $242,000 +5.2% +28.0% Minneapolis Calhoun-Isle $327,780 $318,500 $360,000 $343,000 $340,000 -0.9% +3.7% Minneapolis-Camden $76,500 $101,250 $122,000 $136,400 $155,200 +13.8% +102.9% Minneapolis Central`r $247,250 $321,000 $260,000`r $301,250 `r $313,000 +3.9% +26.6% `r Minneapolis-Longfellow $185,200 $196,250 $207,250 $229,449 $250,000 +9.0% +35.0% Minneapolis'-Near North $80;500 $101,000 $125,200' $134,000 $155,000 +15.7% +92.5% Minneapolis-Nokomis $199,900 $222,375 $227,000 $245,000 $259,950 +6.1% +30.0% Minneapolis Northeast $168,755 $179,500 $199,825' $219,625 $236,000 +7.5% +39.8% Minneapolis-Phillips $90,225 $115,000 $141,500 $156,500 $177,000 +13.1% +96.2% Minneapolis-Powderhorn $157,250 $168,000 $185,050> $200,000 $215,000 +7.5% +36.7% Minneapolis-Southwest $306,000 $323,500 $340,000 $350,000 $382,500 +9.3% +25.0% Minneapolis-University $232,250 $226,000 $230,000 $255,000 $243,500 -4.5% +4.8% Minnetonka $279,000 $270,000 $300,000 $307,350 $335,000 +9.0% +20.1% Minnetonka Beach $670,000 $1,096,450 $1,487,500 $1,305,000 `r $1,640,000 +25.7% +144.8% Minnetrista $435,000 $436,000 $445,500 $456,500 $458,000 +0.3% +5.3% Monticello $156,045 $172,000 $186,000> $199,700 $214,000 +7.2% +37.1% Montrose $149,000 $164,550 $164,450 $186,250 $203,000 +9.0% +36.2% Mora $98,000 $99,750 $122,000> $122,900 $143,150 +16.5% +46.1% Mound $191,000 $202,000 $215,900 $224,500 $249,950 +11.3% +30.9% Mounds View $163,000 $176,000 $187,837> $195,000 $223,000 +14.4% +36.8% New Brighton $171,000 $197,000 $219,900 $241,250 $245,500 +1.8% +43.6% New Germany $142,450 ; $165,708 $153,610' $144,900 ; $212;930 +46.9% +49.5% New Hope $173,000 $185,000 $199,000 $220,000 $225,000 +2.3% +30.1% New Prague $195,000 $189,900 $215,000' $250,000 $249,000 -0.4% +27.7% New Richmond $137,850 $155,850 $178,000 $196,000 $203,612 +3.9% +47.7% 42 Current as of January 9,2018.All data from NorthstarMLS.Report©2018 ShowingTime. 1 19 2017 Annual Housing Market Report-Twin Cities Metro e3li Median Prices - Around the Metro MINNEAPOLIS AREA Association �r REALTORS" Change Change 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 From 2016 From 2013 New Trier $63,700 $0 r $137,000r $0 $205,088 -- +222.0% Newport $140,500 $167,000 $157,261 $189,500 $203,500 +7.4% +44.8% North Branch $150,000 $164,900 $175,778> $187,000 $206,500 +10.4% +37.7% North Oaks $625,000 $632,997 $692,844 $650,000 $660,000 +1.5% +5.6% North Saint Paul $150,500 $168,000 $174,000> $196,000 $210,500 +7.4% +39.9% Northfield $183,000 $183,000 $199,000 $225,950 $242,500 +7.3% +32.5% Norwood Young America $144,000 $157,000 $166,400> $180,000 $214,450 +19.1% +48.9% Nowthen $234,500 $241,000 $305,000 $323,000 $329,900 +2.1% +40.7% Oak Grove $228,920 $243,495 $265,000 $286,000 $324,950 +13.6% +41.9% Oak Park Heights $176,200 $177,000 $202,000 $224,750 $235,000 +4.6% +33.4% Oakdale $164,000 $167,500 $188,900`r $210,250 $211,250 +0.5% +28.8% Orono $501,000 $572,000 $542,500 $616,000 $639,000 +3.7% +27.5% Osseo $141,950 $175,000 $174,900`r $219,000 $205,000 -6.4% +44.4% Otsego $194,525 $214,950 $218,700 $252,825 $255,500 +1.1% +31.3% Pine City $111,275 $120,000 $126,375> $155,000 $149;982 -3.2% +34.8% Pine Springs $320,000 $377,500 $395,000 $451,500 $376,000 -16.7% +17.5% Plymouth $304,450 $305,000 $320,000> $325,000 $340;000 +4.6% +11.7% Princeton $138,900 $149,000 $163,500 $182,450 $181,400 -0.6% +30.6% Prior Lake $270,100 $281,250 $300,000' $294,750 $296,000 +0.4% +9.6% Ramsey $182,000 $199,900 $215,500 $230,000 $239,900 +4.3% +31.8% Randolph $190,000 $262,500 $208,250' $247,000 $257,000 +4.0% +35.3% Red Wing $133,875 $145,000 $147,950 $162,000 $169,250 +4.5% +26.4% Richfield $174,950 $183,750 $205,000`r $221,625 `r $235,700 +6.4% +34.7% River Falls $168,500 $179,900 $195,000 $204,950 $230,000 +12.2% +36.5% Robbinsdale> $140,000 $158,875 $175,000> $185,000 $205,000 +10.8% +46.4% Rockford $197,400 $184,535 $195,299 $211,900 $213,250 +0.6% +8.0% Rogers $265,000 $278,950 $293,978' $287,250 $315,000 +9.7% +18.9% Rosemount $215,000 $228,500 $240,000 $261,350 $270,000 +3.3% +25.6% Roseville $197,535 $205,000 $215,050> $225,213 $243,000 +7.9% +23.0% Rush City $122,750 $149,000 $129,500 $155,000 $172,000 +11.0% +40.1% Saint Anthony $179,950 $211,700 $248,435' $240,000 $269,000 +12.1% +49.5% Saint Bonifacius $185,500 $179,000 $220,000 $234,900 $243,500 +3.7% +31.3% Saint Cloud MSA $145,000 $150,000 $155,900`r $164,900 `r $172,000 +4.3% +18.6% Saint Francis $149,900 $159,450 $180,500 $196,500 $210,350 +7.0% +40.3% Saint Louis Park $218,900 $229,950 $239,000> $245,000 $265,000 +8.2% +21.1% Saint Mary's Point $258,800 $347,400 $235,000 $242,050 $268,000 +10.7% +3.6% Saint Michael $198,900 $220,000 $230,000> $255,000 $275;000 +7.8% +38.3% Saint Paul $143,450 $157,000 $168,000 $180,000 $193,000 +7.2% +34.5% Saint Paul-Battle Creek/Highwood $135,050 $146,251 $157,900> $174,250 $191,258 +9.8% +41.6% Saint Paul-Como Park $177,500 $187,080 $195,000 $205,000 $225,000 +9.8% +26.8% Saint Paul-Dayton's Bluff $93,950 $110,463 $130,000' $137,500 $155;000 +12.7% +65.0% Saint Paul-Downtown $160,000 $172,000 $164,900 $172,000 $179,500 +4.4% +12.2% Saint Paul-Greater East Side $115,500 $129,900 $141,600`r $157,000 $170,000 +8.3% +47.2% Saint Paul-Hamline-Midway $149,125 $155,950 $168,299 $177,500 $207,000 +16.6% +38.8% 43 Current as of January 9,2018.All data from NorthstarMLS.Report©2018 ShowingTime. 1 20 2017 Annual Housing Market Report-Twin Cities Metro e3li Median Prices - Around the Metro MINNEAPOLIS AREA Association �r REALTORS" Change Change 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 From 2016 From 2013 Saint Paul-Highland Park $249,500 $264,000 $271,175r $284,275 $315,000 +10.8% +26.3% r Saint Paul-Merriam Park/Lexington-Ham line $228,950 $249,950 $256,000 $272,750 $287,500 +5.4% +25.6% Saint Paul-Macalester-Groveland $263,500 $277,750 $292,000> $303,500 $324,000 +6.8% +23.0% Saint Paul-North End $89,900 $107,750 $128,500 $139,900 $149,900 +7.1% +66.7% Saint Paul-Payne-Phalen $100,000 $124,900 $134,000> $143,500 $165,000 +15.0% +65.0% Saint Paul-St.Anthony Park $259,500 $239,000 $227,900 $241,700 $250,000 +3.4% -3.7% Saint Paul-Summit Hill $340,000 $344,500 $369,000> $325,000 $391,750 +20.5% +15.2% Saint Paul-Summit-University $170,000 $194,280 $210,000 $218,450 $230,000 +5.3% +35.3% Saint Paul-Thomas-Dale(Frogtown) $80,900 ; $106,500 $130,000 $140,000 ; $145;700 +4.1% +80.1% Saint Paul-West Seventh $145,000 $148,250 $169,900 $185,500 $210,000 +13.2% +44.8% Saint Paul-West Side $122,000 $137,000 $150,000`r $157,400 $175,900 +11.8% +44.2% Saint Paul Park $145,200 $160,000 $172,200 $185,000 $193,000 +4.3% +32.9% Savage $235,000 $255,000 $255,000`r $265,000 $289,900 +9.4% +23.4% Scandia $283,367 $286,250 $298,950 $345,000 $412,500 +19.6% +45.6% Shakopee $194,700 $205,000 $209,000' $222,000 $229;900 +3.6% +18.1% Shoreview $222,750 $223,000 $237,000 $221,500 $251,500 +13.5% +12.9% Shorewood $425,000 $382,500 $417,500> $453,250 $509,000 +12.3% +19.8% Somerset $144,500 $175,000 $179,550 $190,718 $218,075 +14.3% +50.9% South Haven' $179,900 $190,750 $217,000' $260,000 $248;550 -4.4% +38.2% South Saint Paul $139,450 $148,000 $165,000 $179,950 $192,000 +6.7% +37.7% Spring Lake Park $141,000 $164,900 $169,950' $170,000 $198,000 +16.5% +40.4% Spring Park $272,500 $446,050 $310,000 $325,000 $433,550 +33.4% +59.1% Stacy $181,750 $201,950 $200,000r $226,000 `r $245,000 +8.4% +34.8% Stillwater $233,000 $265,000 $256,500 $287,000 $316,000 +10.1% +35.6% Sunfish Lake> $819,000 $1,110,000 $900,000> $533,500 $921,500 +72.7% +12.5% Tonka Bay $477,500 $570,000 $444,012 $649,950 $526,393 -19.0% +10.2% Vadnais Heights $167,250 $194,650 $191,950' $214,550 $240,000 +11.9% +43.5% Vermillion $157,500 $220,000 $0 $228,000 $215,000 -5.7% +36.5% Victoria $371,500 $369,990 $403,250> $423,018 $439,900 +4.0% +18.4% Waconia $229,000 $237,000 $250,000 $266,500 $272,000 +2.1% +18.8% Watertown $175,000 $170,450 $204,900' $217,900 $241;713 +10.9% +38.1% Wayzata $359,000 $627,500 $533,000 $525,000 $905,812 +72.5% +152.3% West Saint Paul $143,500 $156,200 $171,000`r $183,900 `r $195,900 +6.5% +36.5% White Bear Lake $178,500 $192,900 $198,500 $216,400 $229,900 +6.2% +28.8% Willernie $128,900 $160,000 $145,767> $165,000 $215,000 +30.3% +66.8% Woodbury $267,500 $284,000 $288,600 $294,500 $312,400 +6.1% +16.8% Woodland $370,000 $3,275,000 $850,000> $695,000 $1,222,500 +75.9% +230.4% Wyoming $190,000 $209,000 $213,250 $230,900 $254,200 +10.1% +33.8% Zimmerman > $150,500 $161,900 $185,000> $206,000 $216,250 +5.0% +43.7% Zumbrota $126,250 $161,950 $167,000 $197,450 $194,950 -1.3% +54.4% 44 Current as of January 9,2018.All data from NorthstarMLS.Report©2018 ShowingTime. 1 21 2017 Annual Housing Market Report-Twin Cities Metro e3i Median Prices - Minneapolis Neighborhoods MINNEAPOLIS AREA Association �r REALTORS" Change Change 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 From 2016 From 2013 Minneapolis r $189,000 $205,000 $220,000 $230,000 $242,000 +5.2% +28.0% Armatage $250,000 $265,000 $286,600 $277,500 $322,000 +16.0% +28.8% Audubon Park $164,900 $193,800 $221,000> $214,700 $242,000 +12.7% +46.8% Bancroft $165,000 $188,000 $221,650 $220,000 $223,500 +1.6% +35.5% Beltrami $131,000 $147,500 $159,650> $176,500 $218,500 +23.8% +66.8% Bottineau $217,500 $152,250 $205,000 $251,750 $260,000 +3.3% +19.5% Bryant $135,500 $154,000 $186,000> $221,000 $232,250 +5.1% +71.4% Bryn Mawr $308,000 $355,950 $358,470 $376,250 $346,000 -8.0% +12.3% Calhoun(CARAG) $274,900 $254,000 $261,000 $220,000 $228;900 +4.0% -16.7% Cedar-Isles-Dean $367,500 $322,500 $350,025 $397,471 $548,500 +38.0% +49.3% Cedar-Riverside $123,000 $114,100 $128,000`r $135,000 $175,000 +29.6% +42.3% Central $141,500 $157,800 $164,250 $216,500 $217,700 +0.6% +53.9% Cleveland $84;400 $110,500 $122,000`r $143,250 $160,500 +12.0% +90.2% Columbia Park $147,250 $147,750 $155,000 $188,500 $222,550 +18.1% +51.1% Cooper $232,450 $217,000 $235,000' $243,250 $274;950 +13.0% +18.3% Corcoran Neighborhood $137,500 $162,450 $183,500 $182,000 $211,000 +15.9% +53.5% Diamond Lake $245,000 $257,000 $272,000> $300,000 $290,930 -3.0% +18.7% Downtown East-Mpls $460,750 $469,581 $513,000 $542,500 $560,000 +3.2% +21.5% Downtown West-Mpls $210,000 $227,250 $231,000' $237,950 $243,700 +2.4% +16.0% East Calhoun(ECCO) $509,000 $398,500 $400,000 $403,150 $427,500 +6.0% -16.0% East Harriet $297,750 $300,000 $283,350' $336,415 $365,000 +8.5% +22.6% East Isles $300,000 $275,000 $327,500 $328,700 $507,544 +54.4% +69.2% East Phillips $81,250 $112,000 $139,000`r $127,000 `r $177,500 +39.8% +118.5% Elliot Park $229,500 $306,500 $261,500 $389,900 $337,450 -13.5% +47.0% Ericsson $208,000 $248,000 $224,900> $238,450 $265,000 +11.1% +27.4% Field $205,000 $230,000 $252,500 $277,835 $299,450 +7.8% +46.1% Folwell $58,975 $75,000 $80,500 $119,980 $126,000 +5.0% +113.6% Fulton $400,000 $449,950 $416,000 $458,000 $498,500 +8.8% +24.6% Hale $281,500 $292,590 $310,940> $313,398 $345,000 +10.1% +22.6% Harrison $89,000 $135,450 $126,000 $165,250 $175,250 +6.1% +96.9% Hawthorne $89,000 $97,500 $122,500' $124,950 $148;700 +19.0% +67.1% Hiawatha $184,000 $195,000 $198,444 $229,900 $246,500 +7.2% +34.0% Holland $127,290 $165,200 $163,500`r $189,000 `r $196,000 +3.7% +54.0% Howe $179,900 $193,000 $206,000 $225,000 $250,000 +11.1% +39.0% Jordan Neighborhood' $45,000 $72,000 $99,450 $116,500 $135,000 +15.9% +200.0% Keewaydin $207,500 $242,495 $224,750 $245,000 $271,900 +11.0% +31.0% Kenny $256,850 $272,500 $313,672> $302,500 $308,000 +1.8% +19.9% Kenwood $786,180 $922,500 $793,750 $800,000 $920,000 +15.0% +17.0% Kenyon $82,750 ; $99,750 $135,000> $119,500 $138,200 +15.6% +67.0% King Field $250,000 $254,000 $248,200 $262,000 $288,900 +10.3% +15.6% Lind-Bohanon $82,500 $93,500 $116,000' $135,000 $153;075 +13.4% +85.5% Linden Hills $415,000 $469,250 $455,500 $485,750 $524,100 +7.9% +26.3% Logan Park $200,000 $181,500 $210,000' $230,000 $225,500 -2.0% +12.8% Longfellow $174,900 $183,700 $197,200 $216,000 $215,000 -0.5% +22.9% 45 Current as of January 9,2018.All data from NorthstarMLS.Report©2018 ShowingTime. 1 22 2017 Annual Housing Market Report-Twin Cities Metro e3ii Median Prices - Minneapolis Neighborhoods MINNEAPOLIS AREA Association �r REALTORS" Change Change 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 From 2016 From 2013 Loring Park r $210,000 $228,950 $219,950r $231,000 $255,000 +10.4% +21.4% Lowry Hill $562,300 $475,000 $562,500 $507,000 $426,250 -15.9% -24.2% Lowry Hill East $255,000 $236,500 $299,500 $284,900 $271,400 -4.7% +6.4% Lyndale $179,000 $174,997 $181,000 $200,000 $195,000 -2.5% +8.9% Lynnhurst $435,000 $449,900 $480,000> $485,000 $539,450 +11.2% +24.0% Marcy Holmes $238,400 $315,000 $284,000 $360,000 $258,000 -28.3% +8.2% Marshall Terrace $157,500 $146,250 $170,000> $210,000 $214,000 +1.9% +35.9% McKinley $60,000 $81,050 $93,000 $103,500 $128,250 +23.9% +113.8% Midtown Phillips $102,400 $132,000 $148,000' $166,000 $173,759 +4.7% +69.7% Minnehaha $174,900 $187,500 $198,500 $215,201 $216,250 +0.5% +23.6% Morris Park $150,000 $165,450 $168,250`r $190,189 $210,000 +10.4% +40.0% Near North $85,000 $128,000 $134,750 $146,750 $171,326 +16.7% +101.6% Nicollet Island-East Bank $393,000 $299,000 $294,950`r $363,900 $385,000 +5.8% -2.0% North Loop $273,842 $284,000 $295,000 $327,950 $375,500 +14.5% +37.1% Northeast Park $135,000 $162,950 $132,000' $172,650 $237,000 +37.3% +75.6% Northrop $207,530 $239,900 $232,000 $267,000 $267,750 +0.3% +29.0% Page $321,525 $350,000 $339,900> $390,000 $410,000 +5.1% +27.5% Phillips West $98,625 $127,950 $174,900 $182,500 $211,500 +15.9% +114.4% Powderhorn Park $137,000 $165,700 $168,900' $189,250 $213,450 +12.8% +55.8% Prospect Park-East River Road $261,250 $229,000 $286,250 $300,000 $257,000 -14.3% -1.6% Regina $155,000 $173,500 $222,500' $213,800 $240,000 +12.3% +54.8% Seward $185,000 $210,000 $191,639 $254,211 $251,600 -1.0% +36.0% Sheridan $134,000 $178,000 $205,000`r $264,500 `r $241,250 -8.8% +80.0% `r Shingle Creek $90,000 $118,500 $135,947 $149,900 $169,900 +13.3% +88.8% Southeast Como $180,000 $160,750 $182,750> $216,000 $227,944 +5.5% +26.6% St.Anthony East $168,000 $205,550 $181,500 $242,500 $202,500 -16.5% +20.5% St.Anthony West $237,500 $278,318 $243,000' $295,000 $345,000 +16.9% +45.3% Standish $169,950 $180,000 $194,000 $208,450 $228,000 +9.4% +34.2% Stevens Square-Loring Heights $120,000 $113,750 $112,000> $154,900 $129,375 -16.5% +7.8% Sumner-Glenwood $220,500 $222,500 $270,000 $279,900 $285,000 +1.8% +29.3% Tangletown $320,500 $315,000 $388,000' $391,000 $435,000 +11.3% +35.7% University of Minnesota $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Ventura Village $82,775 $95,350 $103,000r $141,000 $196,000 +39.0% +136.8% Victory $129,000 $138,000 $144,500 $169,500 $182,500 +7.7% +41.5% Waite Park $188,780 $185,000 $200,000> $217,000 $235,000 +8.3% +24.5% Webber-Camden $62,000 $100,900 $115,000 $114,000 $149,450 +31.1% +141.0% Wenonah $176,000 $184,450 $202,000> $229,500 $246,000 +7.2% +39.8% West Calhoun $235,000 $228,250 $186,000 $179,250 $227,500 +26.9% -3.2% Whittier $151,500 $145,000 $170,000> $159,400 $164,500 +3.2% +8.6% > Willard-Hay $97,000 $108,750 $129,350 $132,000 $155,532 +17.8% +60.3% Windom $218,900 $216,850 $262,225' $271,450 $284;000 +4.6% +29.7% Windom Park $188,000 $223,875 $235,000 $243,000 $277,000 +14.0% +47.3% 46 Current as of January 9,2018.All data from NorthstarMLS.Report©2018 ShowingTime. 1 23 2017 Annual Housing Market Report-Twin Cities Metro e3i, Median Prices - Townships MINNEAPOLIS AREA Association �r REALTORS" Change Change 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 From 2016 From 2013 Baytown Township $525,000 $590,000 $735,429r $712,500 $725,000 +1.8% +38.1% Belle Plaine Township $330,000 $305,000 $225,000 $288,719 $390,000 +35.1% +18.2% Benton Township $122,950 $299,000 $460,000 $343,000 $257,000 -25.1% +109.0% Blakeley Township $180,000 $314,000 $395,000 $0 $122,500 -- -31.9% Camden Township $200,000 $0 $0 $417,000 $0 -100,0% -100.0% Castle Rock Township $252,500 $172,500 $331,000 $214,900 $417,450 +94.3% +65.3% Cedar Lake Township> $372,250 $470,000 $405,000> $350,000 $296,750 -15.2% -20.3% Credit River Township $449,000 $525,680 $423,250 $450,000 $580,000 +28.9% +29.2% Dahlgren Township $290,000 $176,000 $383,000' $424,750 $381;500 -10.2% +31.6% Douglas Township $170,000 $316,900 $154,900 $298,500 $380,000 +27.3% +123.5% Empire Township $253,000 $267,950 $282,000' $264,260 $275,000 +4.1% +8.7%0 Eureka Township $125,000 $216,250 $149,900 $195,950 $220,000 +12.3% +76.0% Greenvale Township r $201,000 $0 $312,000`r $365,000 $311,000 -14.8% +54.7% Grey Cloud Island Township $0 $159,050 $267,500 $236,900 $381,000 +60.8% Hancock Township $0 $0 $0 $330,000 $0 -100.0% Hassan Township $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Helena Township $346,066 $215,000 $577,500> $290,250 $295,000 +1.6% -14.8% Hollywood Township $169,950 $0 $195,000 $408,100 $320,000 -21.6% +88.3% Jackson Township $117,450 $147,500 $161,900' $407,500 $170,000 -58.3% +44.7% Laketown Township $137,000 $130,000 $135,000 $194,250 $206,000 +6.0% +50.4% Linwood Township $219,900 $199,900 $238,200' $263,750 $294,200 +11.5% +33.8% Louisville Township $345,000 $352,500 $232,000 $330,000 $328,125 -0.6% -4.9% Marshan Township $277,500 $0 $409,000`r $322,500 `r $479,889 +48.8% +72.9% May Township $360,000 $323,125 $410,000 $435,500 $540,000 +24.0% +50.0% New Market Township $359,700 $290,000 $380,000' $400,000 $329,000 -17.8% -8.5% Nininger Township $324,000 $325,000 $405,000 $212,500 $247,450 +16.4% -23.6% Randolph Township $0 $0 $344,000' $0 $359,000 Ravenna Township $238,000 $245,500 $303,500 $220,000 $310,863 +41.3% +30.6% San Francisco Township $185,000 $0 > $0 $298,000 $332,200 +11.5% +79.6% Sand Creek Township $284,500 $332,500 $310,000 $316,250 $397,200 +25.6% +39.6% Sciota Township $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 -- -- Spring Lake Township $385,450 $327,000 $350,000 $454,675 $437,500 -3.8% +13.5% St.Lawrence Township $146,300 $0`r $0 $600,000 `r $458,000 -23.7% +213.1% Stillwater Township $479,425 $415,000 $447,250 $475,000 $466,500 -1.8% -2.7% Vermillion Township 'r $258,450 $270,000 $291,000' $377,500 $419,000 +11.0% +62.1% Waconia Township $291,250 $415,000 $478,000 $476,400 $360,000 -24.4% +23.6% Waterford Township $72,500 $0 $0 $158,000 $197,500 +25.0% +172.4% Watertown Township $392,500 $192,000 $435,000 $1,050,000 $249,900 -76.2% -36.3% West Lakeland Township $438,000 $480,000 $445,000> $443,575 $528,500 +19.1% +20.7% White Bear Township $215,000 $225,900 $236,000 $260,900 $269,500 +3.3% +25.3% Young America Township $537,500 $0 ; $350,450' $451,500 $355;000 -21.4% -34.0% 47 Current as of January 9,2018.All data from NorthstarMLS.Report©2018 ShowingTime. 1 24 2017 Annual Housing Market Report-Twin Cities Metro e3ii Median Prices - Counties MINNEAPOLIS AREA Association �r REALTORS" Change Change 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 From 2016 From 2013 Anoka County $174,900 $187,825 $200,000> $219,900 $232,000 +5.5% +32.6% Carver County $252,000 $258,050 $273,490 $279,900 $312,250 +11.6% +23.9% Chisago County $165,000 $183,000 $191,450 $209,950 $229,900 +9.5% +39.3% Dakota County $200,000 $215,000 $226,900 $240,000 $252,200 +5.1% +26.1% Goodhue County $145,000 $153,500 $165,000' $169,900 $189,900 +11.8% +31.0% Hennepin County $209,900 $221,000 $235,000 $246,700 $263,900 +7.0% +25.7% Isanti County $128,050 $149,900 $161,533' $176,961 $195,350 +10.4% +52.6% Kanabec County $100,000 $101,000 $121,313 $130,000 $144,050 +10.8% +44.1% Mille Lacs County $110,000 $124,900 $137,500r $149,555 $160,500 +7.3% +45.9% Ramsey County $163,000 $176,500 $187,810 $200,000 $216,500 +8.3% +32.8% Rice County $158,000 $167,500 $172,000' $193,000 $216,660 +12.3% +37.1% Scott County $226,500 $239,900 $245,000 $257,000 $267,000 +3.9% +17.9% Sherburne County $162,500 $175,000 $189,900' $209,575 $224,000 +6.9% +37.8% St.Croix County $177,500 $186,000 $208,000 $219,900 $239,023 +8.7% +34.7% Washington County $220,000 $236,000 $242,300' $260,000 $278,900 +7.3% +26.8% Wright County $176,250 $185,000 $205,000 $219,000 $236,247 +7.9% +34.0% 48 Current as of January 9,2018.All data from NorthstarMLS.Report©2018 ShowingTime. 1 25 2017 Annual Housing Market Report-Twin Cities Metro e2� Historical Review MINNEAPOLIS AREA Association -f REALTORS" Listings Dollar Volume Number of Average Year Processed (in billions) Units Sold Sales Price 1980 37,018 $1.34 18;;351 $74,069 1981 35,580 $1.25 15,675 $80,238 1982 41,465 $1.00 12,193 $82,288 1983 50,794 $1.35 15,914 $84,953 1984 53,646 $1.55 181,231 $85,007 1985 51,492 $1.87 21,335 $87,789 1986 58,382 $2.52 28,015 $90,319 1987 55,422 $2.46 25,772 $95,914 1988 80,771 $3.21 34,244 $93,977 1989 89,170 $3.28 33,962 $96,658 1990 78,548 $3.37 34,496 $98,016 1991 71,850 $3.52 35,598 $99,402 1992 72,730 $4.31 41,944 $103,264 1993 70,685 $4.30 39,842 $107,569 1994 63,369 $4.73 42,454 $111,806 1980-1996 1995 64,556 $4.94 42,310 $117,053 All property types and all MLS districts. 1996 73,433 $5.82 46,949 $124,022 1997 63,189 $5.68 41,441 $137,085 1998 64,280 $7.09 47,836 $147,346 1997-2002 1999 57,573 $7.62 46,675 $163,277 Single-family detached homes,condominiums, 2000 59,618 $8.76 48,208 $181,605 townhomes and twin homes 2001 71,861 $10.22 50,298 $203,136 for the 13-county metro area. 2002 73,940 $11.33 51,212 $221,275 2003 89,592 $13.92 58,275 $238,798 2004 101,834 $15.78 61,180 $257,838 > 2003-Present 2005 101,580 $16.78 61,029 $272,239 Single-family detached homes,condominiums, 2006 110,301 $14.07 50,246 $277,496 townhomes and twin homes. 2007 107,246 $11.53 41,698 $274,109 In 2012,home sales were 2008 95,532 $9.53 40,272 $234,975 > recalculated to account for all 2009 84,701 $9.26 46,584 $197,993 late-recorded activity, 2010 83,477 $8.24 38,976 $209,631 affecting data back to 2003. 2011 70,192 $8.18 42,296 $192,063 In 2017,the metro area 2012 67,150 $10.44 49;;578 $209,216 expanded by three counties. All numbers were recalculated 2013 73,314 $12.74 53,927 $234,797 back to 2003 to account for 2014 74,899 $12.71 50,357 $251,017 the 16-county metro area. 2015 78,802 $15.06 57,385 $261,422 2016 77,876 $16.72 611,056 $273,088 2017 76,159 $17.99 61,168 $293,674 Visit mplsrealtor.com to access up-to-date market reports throughout the year. See residential real estate trends in sharp detail by week, month and geography through a mobile-ready interactive interface that allows for the creation of shareable charts. 49 Current as of January 9,2018.All data from NorthstarMLS.Report©2018 ShowingTime. 26 CITY OF CENTERVILLE CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES April 11, 2018 6:30 p.m. Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, the City of Centerville held their regularly scheduled City Council meeting of April 11, 2018 at City Hall, 1880 Main Street. PRESENT: Mayor Jeff Paar Council Member Steve King Council Member Russ Koski 1 \ o t Approved Council Member D. LoveV Council Member Matt Montain ABSENT: None. STAFF: City Attorney Kurt Glaser City Administrator/Engineer Mark Statz COUNCIL MEETING L CALL TO ORDER Mayor Paar called to order 6:30 p.m. II. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE III. APPROVAL OF AGENDA Mayor Paar added the March 28, 2018 City Council Meeting Minutes as Pages 45a-45e, Check #31777-31785 w/Voided Check #31766 under Item #1 and added CenterPoint Energy Community Partnership Grant Application (CFD) under Item #7, Consent Agenda Motion by Council Member Love, Seconded by Council Member Montain to Approve the Agenda as noted. All in favor. Motion carried. IV. APPOINTMENTS/PRESENTATIONS 1. Mr. Eric Maass,WSB—Review of Land Use, Housing & Transportation Chapters of Comprehensive Plan Mr. Eric Maass was available for comments and questions. Mr. Maass reviewed the submitted Land Use, Housing and Transportation Chapters of the Comprehensive Plan at this evenings meeting but also reviewed them prior with the Planning & Zoning Commission and incorporated slight modifications that they suggested. 50 City of Centerville Council Meeting Minutes April 11,2018 Mr. Maass explained that the Planning & Zoning Commission felt that five (5) areas of the existing 2030 Future Land Use Plan should be modified taking into consideration future development. He explained that the Anoka County Parks & Recreation building along Main Street should be zoned Public/Semi-Public rather than Commercial, the old Waterworks site and parcel next to it should be zoned Medium Density Residential rather than Commerical and High Density Residential, the Burke and Church owned parcels along Centerville Lake should be zoned CBD/Mixed Use rather than Low Density Residential, parcels abutting Main Street on the south side between Dupre Road and City Hall along with the Paulsen property should be zoned CBD/Mixed Use rather than Low Density Residential and property north of Peltier Circle zoned Public/Semi-Public which should be zoned Low Density Residential. He stated that approximately 17 undeveloped parcels are slated for development by 2040. He also stated that the remainder of the Chapter was updated accordingly. He reported that the Chapter identifies specific land use categories and strategies for future growth and redevelopment. The Mayor and Council Member Koski thanked Mr. Maass and his staff for a nicely completed chapter and felt that the details and graphs were easy to interpret. Mr. Eric Maass reviewed the Housing Chapter with Council and stated that the chapter reflects forecasts from Met. Council and Anoka County regarding estimated households. He stated that WSB included development of remaining vacant lands and the downtown master plan. That areas of future residential development were identified along with densities by the Planning & Zoning Commission and incorporated in the Chapter. He stated that the graphs were adjusted accordingly. Discussion ensued regarding affordable housing and Area Medium Income (AMI), Mr. Maass stated that Met. Council states that the City's needs are 9 units for those under 30% AMI, 4 units for those with income 31-50% AMI and 1 unit for those with income 51-80% AMI for a total of 14. He stated that Met. Council considers any housing development more than eight units per acre to qualify as affordable housing. He stated with the anticipated development and modifications Planning & Zoning took regarding rezoning areas the requirements would be met by 2040 if construction goals were met. Discussion ensued regarding Met. Council's definition of affordable housing/workforce housing comparative to Section 8 housing. Mr. Maass stated that the Transportation Chapter took into consideration the Regional Transportation Strategies outlined by Met. Council and WSB worked with the City of Lino Lakes regarding projects that would require both cities to work together such as shared roadways, etc. He stated that the City should include projects that they see in the future with expected growth of abutting communities also. He stated that this is due to funding possibilities in the future. Mayor Paar stated that finishing Centerville Road south of Dupre Road to Birch Street would assist in moving traffic and the roadways would be similar; another project would be with the added housing anticipated along 20th Avenue even though it is a County Road the City may desire to make modifications that would require costs being absorbed by the City. Discussion ensued regarding the potential for widening Main Street in the near future. Mr. Maass stated that the city has the park and ride and a bus route located within its limits but no aviation, rail lines, barge facilities or intermodal freight terminals. Page 2 of 7 51 City of Centerville Council Meeting Minutes April 11,2018 Mr. Maass stated that WSB would be back before them at the end of the month to discuss parks, sanitary sewer, water supply and surface water chapters; an draft plan Open House regarding the plan with review of comments and review of draft implementation plan at the May P & Z meeting; appear before Council at your May 9, 2018 meeting with review of Open House comments and draft implementation plan and then back before the P & Z on June 5 for the official public hearing on the full draft. He stated that it was anticipated that the plan could receive approval by Council at their June 13, 2018 meeting and then forwarded to adjacent communities and Met. Council. He did however state that there is one additional meeting prior to the deadline incase additional time is needed. Administrator Statz stated that if anyone had corrections to forward them to him and he would see to it that Mr. Maass received those for correction. Council Member Koski thanked the P & Z Commission for their efforts and also thanked WSB staff for their work thus far. Mayor Paar also expressed his gratitude. V. PUBLIC HEARING 1. None. VI. APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES 1. March 28, 2018 City Council Meeting Minutes Council Member Love requested that a modification to the word "there" be changed to "theme" on page 5, under Council/Administrator Announcements, paragraph four sentence one. Motion by Council Member Montain, seconded by Council Member Love to Approve the March 28, 2018 Meeting Minutes as Amended. All in favor. Motion carried. VII. CONSENT AGENDA 1. City of Centerville March 29, 2018 through April 11, 2018 Claims (Check#31751- 31775)W/Voided Check#30182 & (Check#31777-31786 W/Voided Check#31776) 2. Centennial Lakes Police Claims through April 5, 2018 (Check#11900-11916) & Optum Bank& US Bank 3. Centennial Fire District Claims through April 3, 2018 (Check#8157-8162) & WEX, HSA & US Bank 4. Successful Completion of Year 5, Building Inspection Mr. Dan Schmitz 5. P & Z Recommendation for Appointment 6. P & R Recommendation for Appointment 7. Center Point Energy Community Partnership Grant Application (CFD) Mayor Paar provided Council with an opportunity to discuss any item(s). Page 3 of 7 52 City of Centerville Council Meeting Minutes April 11,2018 Motion by Council Member Love, seconded by Council Member Montain to Approve the Consent Agenda as presented. Discussion ensued and Council Member Love thanked Mr. Dan Schmitz for his service and excellent work ethic. Council Member Koski questioned Checks regarding Office Supplies, Lights and O'Rielly Automotive and whether the City is a part of the State Purchasing Cooperative and receiving the best possible purchase prices. Administrator Statz concurred and stated that the City has researched becoming an Amazon account holder also in an attempt to secure best-price offerings. Council thanked individuals that applied for the vacancies on both P & R and P & Z, Administrator Statz stated that staff is encouraged about the community engagement that we have had and Mayor Paar stated that the EDA and Festival Committees are also looking for members/volunteers. All in favor. Motion carried. VI. OLD BUSINESS 1. RFPs Solid Waste, Recycling & Yard Waste Collection Administrator Statz stated that the City had received four (4) RFPs, with two (2) being very competitive; however, one (1) of the bidders averaged their fees/flat fees for carts rather than what was requested. He stated that staff desired to request another submittal for negotiation purposes with Waste Management(current provider) and Republic Services. Attorney Glaser stated that the RFP process in this case is unique due to the services being tangible rather than a contract for road construction. He stated that we do not have to award to the lowest bidder and the City has discretion to negotiate. Administrator Statz stated that Mr. Jason Hartman, Waste Management, was present this evening to introduce himself and answer any questions Council may have. Mr. Hartman stated that he has been in the business for 10 years with being with Waste Management for just under a year and this being his first RFP. He stated that many of the drivers for Waste Management have been with the company for 15 years and even one (1) of the drivers lives in town and have been with Waste Management for the entire time that the contract has been in effect. He stated that he did not have a problem competing with Republic Services. Discussion ensued regarding Waste Management's satisfactory service over the years, prompt correction of errors, etc. Motion by Council Member Koski, seconded by Council Member Love to Authorize Staff to Negotiate with Waste Management and Republic Services for Solid Waste, Recycling & Yard Waste Collection. Page 4 of 7 53 City of Centerville Council Meeting Minutes April 11,2018 Discussion ensued regarding if another vendor chose to decrease the initial RFP prices they could and be considered? Attorney Glaser stated that the negotiations are open and someone could, however the initial proposals are not public. All in favor. Motion carried. IX. NEW BUSINESS 1. Schedule Regular City Council Work Session—(1 per month) Administrator Statz stated that he felt that a regularly scheduled work session would benefit Staff and Council allowing for more healthy discussions regarding such items as the budget, EDA organization, Comprehensive Plan and etc. He stated that he felt that the benefits may improve Council efficiency at their regular meetings. Lengthy discussion was had regarding the possible necessity of not completing items within the timeframe for the work session and continuing it following the regularly scheduled Council meeting, meeting dates and times, public notice requirements, etc. Motion by Council Member Montain, seconded by Council Member Love to Schedule Regular Work Sessions Prior to the 2nd Regularly Scheduled Council Meeting of Every Month Beginning at 5:30 p.m. Discussion ensued regarding Council general cancellation of the second meetings in November and December and if necessary these would be scheduled for the first meetings or cancelled but noticed. All in favor. Motion carried. It was noted that Council would be holding a Work Session at 5:30 p.m. prior to their April 25, 2018 regularly scheduled Council Meeting. 2. Parks & Recreation Committee Recommendation for Adding One (1) Additional ADA Accessible Port-a-Pot to the City's AirFresh Contract ($500-$625) Administrator Statz stated that a representative of the Bald Eagle Ski Club appeared before the P & R Committee and requested to have a port-a-pot on site for their use for their members to change in. Upon additional discussion at P & R, the Committee felt that the port-a-pot could have dual purpose for the Club changing in and public use. He stated that the club initially desired for the unit to be placed near the lakeshore by their activities, however this area is unsuitable due to location near the lake, handicap accessibility and emptying access. He also stated that lengthy discussion was had regarding alternative placement near/within Cornerstone Park, visibility of the facility while entering the community, screening, location markings, show length, use of other port-a-pot locations within a short walking distance, use of local businesses facilities, providing services for an event that is not sponsored by the City and fees associated with the placement. Page 5 of 7 54 City of Centerville Council Meeting Minutes April 11,2018 Motion by Council Member Koski, seconded by Council Member Love to Table the Item following Staffs additional discussions with the Bald Eagle Water Ski Club, obtaining costs associated with screening and location markings. Council Member King was opposed to the placement and fees associated with the port-a-pot and Mayor Paar desired additional information submittal. All in favor. Motion carried. 3. MCMA Conference Attendance—City Admin. Statz Administrator Statz stated that during the interview process for his position he proposed an educational plan which included the above stated conference and he desired to attend the MCMA Conference as several colleagues of his who have become Administrators will be attending and he believes that the conference would allow him valuable networking and training opportunities. He stated that the conference is May 2-4, 2018. Council felt that the item should have been placed on the Consent Agenda as it was a portion of Administrator Statz's contract. Motion by Council Member Montain, seconded by Council Member Love to Approve the MCMA Conference Attendance of City Administrator Statz as presented. All in favor. Motion carried. X. COUNCIL/ADMINISTRATOR ANNOUNCEMENTS Administrator Statz stated that Staff has been including Informational Material at the end of Council's Agenda with the items not needing action but noteworthy. Attorney Glaser stated that in the absence of the City Administrator staff met with a developer and neighboring property owners regarding a proposed development on the old Waterworks site and an additional property owner along LaValle Drive that proposes to also develop two (2) parcels. He stated that he was impressed as Staff arranged the meeting but the developer invited those nearest the development(s) an opportunity to participate in the meeting. He stated that it was recommended due to the close proximity of both developments and knowledge of each of the developers that they work cooperatively with an engineering firm and additional contracted services in an attempt to cost share requirements, etc. He stated that the Waterwork's site proposal is for 18 homes and the other proposal is for 3-5 homes. The development would be retaining Mr. DeFoe's existing home. Council Member King stated that he recently reviewed an article in the paper about the recent Ramsey County District Court ruling denying several post-trial motion from the DNR regarding the court's ruling in August of 2017. Council Member Love reminded the audience that registration for the upcoming Fete des Lacs parade was open and free with the theme being "Cougar Pride". Page 6 of 7 55 City of Centerville Council Meeting Minutes April 11,2018 Council Member Koski thanked the P & Z Commission and P & R Committee for interviewing their candidates, he stated it was refreshing to have as many applicants as they had for P & Z and thanked both P & Z and P & R for their contribution and dedication to their community. Mayor Paar stated that the City is active on Facebook and to please follow us on Facebook and Twitter as it is the easiest and fastest lines of communication. He also stated that he would be attempting to participate in the upcoming Capital Day to meet with local Representatives regarding the funding inequities for schools. He reported that at the recent Fire Steering meeting which Council Member King also attended it was reported that they are a quarter through the year and slightly under budget. He also reported that calls have increased but it is not anticipated that it will affect the budget and that Station 1 has a crew of 12 and Station 3 has a crew of 19 Firefighters/EMTs. He stated that a large amount of discussion has been had regarding Duty Crews and the Chief with the Committee's approval increased the pay from $13/hr. to $20/hr. Additional discussion and ideas will be had in alleviating day-time response shortages. Mayor Paar reported that in 2017 the department was under budget and are considering station remodeling efforts such as carpet, tile, appliances, etc. being that they are very outdated. XIII. ADJOURNMENT Motion by Council Member Koski, seconded by Council Member Montain to Adiourn the Regularly Scheduled Meeting of April 11, 2018 at 8:42 p.m. All in favor. Motion carried. Respectfully submitted by City Clerk, Teresa Bender Page 7 of 7 56 CITY OF CENTERVILLE 04/20/1810:50 AM Page 1 Check Detail - April 25, 2018 Check Date Check# Vender Name Comments Amount 4/25/2018 001167E PSN PERMITS&FEES-SERV THRU 3-1-18 THRU 3-31-18 $199.34 4/25/2018 001167E PSN MISC- (WATER METER)-SERV THRU 3-1-18- 3-31-18 $4.90 4/25/2018 001167E PSN UTILITIES-SERV THRU 3-1-18- 3-31-18 $206.80 4/25/2018 001167E PSN UTILITIES-SERV THRU 3-1-18- 3-31-18 $206.81 Check Nbr 001167 PSN $617.85 4/20/2018 001168E IRS/EFTPS FED W/H- PAY PERIOD 8 $2,440.34 4/20/2018 001168E IRS/EFTPS FICA/MED W/H- PAY PERIOD 8 $3,701.00 Check Nbr 001168 IRS/EFTPS $6,141.34 4/20/2018 001169E MINNESOTA DEPT OF REVENUE STATE W/H-PAY PERIOD 8 Check Nbr 001169 MINNESOTA DEPT OF REVENUE X1,131.26 4/20/2018 001170E OPTUM BANK- H.S.A. H.S.A.W/H-PAY PERIOD 8 Check Nbr 001170 OPTUM BANK- H.S.A. X1,299.80 4/20/2018 001171E PERA PERA W/H- PAY PERIOD 8 Check Nbr 001171 PERA $3,294.13 4/20/2018 001172E TASC F.S.A.W/H-PAY PERIOD 8 Check Nbr 001172 TASC $258.32 4/25/2018 031787 ALLSTREAM P.W. PHONE-SERV THRU 4-22-18 Check Nbr 031787 ALLSTREAM $89.86 4/25/2018 031788 ANOKA COUNTY TREASURY VOTING EQUIPMENT-JPA Check Nbr 031788 ANOKA COUNTY TREASURY $887.14 4/25/2018 031789 COMCAST HIGH SPEED INTERNET-SERV THRU 5-21-18 Check Nbr 031789 COMCAST $105.92 4/25/2018 031790 DELTA DENTAL MAY 2018 DENTAL INS Check Nbr 031790 DELTA DENTAL $431.10 4/25/2018 031791 HYDRO-VAC INC. CLEAN LIFT STATION FOR NEW PUMP- 1783 PELTIER LAKE Check Nbr 031791 HYDRO-VAC INC. $1,000.00 4/25/2018 031792 MARCO,INC. MONTHLY CHARGES-APRIL- KONICA MINOLTA AGREEMENT Check Nbr 031792 MARCO,INC. $241.32 4/25/2018 031793 MET. COUNCIL ENV. SERV. (SDS) MAY 2018 WASTEWATER SERVICE Check Nbr 031793 MET. COUNCIL ENV. SERV. ISDSI 119.408.64 4/25/2018 031794 PRESS PUBLICATIONS INFO REGARDING ASSESSMENTS&CLASSIFICATION OF Check Nbr 031794 PRESS PUBLICATIONS X41.26 4/25/2018 031795 STANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES IN WATER UTILITY-SERV THRU 3-30-18 $710.00 4/25/2018 031795 STANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES IN STORM WATER UTILITY-SERV THRU 3-30-18 $187.50 4/25/2018 031795 STANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES IN GENERAL ENGINEERING 2018-SERV THRU 3-30-18 $80.00 Check Nbr 031795 STANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES IN $977.50 4/25/2018 031796 VERIZION WIRELESS CELL PHONE CHARGES-SERV THRU 4-9-18 $105.49 4/25/2018 031796 VERIZION WIRELESS CELL PHONE CHARGES-SERV THRU 4-9-18 $35.16 4/25/2018 031796 VERIZION WIRELESS CELL PHONE CHARGES-SERV THRU 4-9-18 $35.16 4/25/2018 031796 VERIZION WIRELESS CELL PHONE CHARGES-SERV THRU 4-9-18 35.16 Check Nbr 031796 VERIZION WIRELESS $210.97 4/25/2018 031797 WSB&ASSOCIATES 2040 COMP PLAN-SERV THRU 3-31-18 Check Nbr 031797 WSB&ASSOCIATES X3,579.50 4/25/2018 031798 XCEL ENERGY 1880 MAIN ST-CITY HALL/FIRE STATION-SERV THRU 4-7- $476.30 4/25/2018 031798 XCEL ENERGY STREET LIGHTS-SERV THRU 4-4-18 $1,948.10 4/25/2018 031798 XCEL ENERGY 1875 FOX RUN-PUMP-SERV THRU 4-4-18 $145.78 4/25/2018 031798 XCEL ENERGY 1600 LAMOTTE DR-WARMING HOUSE-SERV THRU 4-4-18 $24.74 4/25/2018 031798 XCEL ENERGY 7300 MILL RD-SEWER LIFT-SERV THRU 4-4-18 $170.51 4/25/2018 031798 XCEL ENERGY 1889 CENTER ST-SEWER LIFT-SERV THRU 4-4-18 $31.63 4/25/2018 031798 XCEL ENERGY 7285 MAIN ST-SERV THRU 4-4- 18 $52.20 4/25/2018 031798 XCEL ENERGY 1880 MAIN ST-SERV THRU 4-7-18 $973.00 4/25/2018 031798 XCEL ENERGY 1600 LAMOTTE DR- BALLFIELD LIGHTS-SERV THRU 4-4-18 183.32 Check Nbr 031798 XCEL ENERGY $4,005.58 Total Checks $43,721.49 4-18-2018- Pay Period 8 total $16,153.32 57 CENTENNIAL LAKES POLICE DEPT Check Register-Police GL without invoice numbers Page: 1 Check Issue Dates: 4/6/2018-4/18/2018 Apr 18, 2018 11:44AM Report Criteria: Report type: Summary GL Check Ck No Description Check Period Issue Date Payee Amount 04/18 04/18/2018 11918 ABRAMS&SCHMIDT LLC MARCH LEGAL FEES 1,431.00 04/18 04/18/2018 11919 AMAZON DIGITAL VOICE RECORDER 47.93 04/18 04/18/2018 11920 ANOKA COUNTY 1ST QTR CJDN/MDT 540.00 04/18 04/18/2018 11921 ANOKA CO TREASURY DEPT. MAY BROADBAND 75.00 04/18 04/18/2018 11922 ANOKA COUNTY SOLID WASTE FEE 545.16 04/18 04/18/2018 11923 ANOKA COUNTY ATTORNEY FOREFEITURE DISTRIBUTION JL 288.80 04/18 04/18/2018 11924 ASPEN MILLS, INC BODY ARMOR DS 1,472.95 04/18 04/18/2018 11925 CMC GOVERNMENT SUPPLY 8 SHOTGUN SLINGS 217.59 04/18 04/18/2018 11926 CENTENNIAL UTILITIES MARCH UTILITIES 517.74 04/18 04/18/2018 11927 CENTURY LINK COMMUNICATIONS APRIL 115.59 04/18 04/18/2018 11928 CITY OF CIRCLE PINES HOME DEPOT CHG BALLAST/KOHLER 78.81 04/18 04/18/2018 11929 CONNEXUS ENERGY ELECTRIC MARCH 1,834.62 04/18 04/18/2018 11930 CONSOLIDATED COMMUNICATIONS PHONES 371.49 04/18 04/18/2018 11931 DELTA DENTAL MAY DENTAL 1,260.30 04/18 04/18/2018 11932 DON'S CIRCLE SERVICE, INC VEHICLE REPAIRS &MTC 103.45 04/18 04/18/2018 11933 HEALTH PARTNERS APRIL HEALTH INS 9,944.39 04/18 04/18/2018 11934 HOLIDAY STATIONSTORES, LLC FUEL MARCH 2,498.97 04/18 04/18/2018 11935 WILLIAM JACOBSON INTERVIEW OFFICER CANDIDATES L 22.01 04/18 04/18/2018 11936 LEAGUE OF MN CITIES INS TRUST W WORK COMP INS 4/1/2018-4/1/2019 52,887.00 04/18 04/18/2018 11937 MMKR INC PROGRESS BILLING 2017 AUDIT 4,000.00 04/18 04/18/2018 11938 NEAL A. NOREN MARCH BLDG MTC HOURS 120.00 04/18 04/18/2018 11939 OFFICE OF MN IT SERVICES WAN SERVICES MARCH 57.20 04/18 04/18/2018 11940 CITY OF ST PAUL PDI TRAINING JK 180.00 04/18 04/18/2018 11941 SHRED-N-GO, INC MARCH SHREDDING SERVICE 48.83 04/18 04/18/2018 11942 STATE OF MINNESOTA FORFEITURE DISTRIBUTION JL 144.40 04/18 04/18/2018 11943 PAUL H STEFFEL INS AGENT OF RECORD 2018 1,500.00 04/18 04/18/2018 11944 STREICHER'S, INC 3 AVON C50 GAS MASKS 1,089.00 04/18 04/18/2018 11945 TELECIDE PRODUCTIONS, INC HARD DRIVE/TERASTATION SERVER 1,719.97 04/18 04/18/2018 11946 TOP GREEN CO. APRIL GROUNDS MTC 714.66 04/18 04/18/2018 11947 VERIZON WIRELESS SQUAD LAPTOP CHARGES MARCH 1,086.19 Grand Totals: 84,913.05 M = Manual Check, V=Void Check 58 CENTENNIAL LAKES POLICE DEPT Check Register-Police GL without invoice numbers Page: 1 Check Issue Dates: 4/18/2018-4/18/2018 Apr 18, 2018 02:14PM Report Criteria: Report type: Summary Check.Payee name="dearborn national' GL Check Ck No Description Check Period Issue Date Payee Amount 04/18 04/18/2018 11948 DEARBORN NATIONAL MAY LIFE INS 1,363.15 Grand Totals: 1,363.15 M = Manual Check, V=Void Check 59 CENTENNIAL FIRE DISTRICT Check Register- FIRE GL Page: 1 Check Issue Dates: 4/4/2018-4/19/2018 Apr 19, 2018 03:11 PM Report Criteria: Report type: Summary GL Check Check Vendor Description Check Period Issue Date Number Number Payee Amount 04/18 04/19/2018 8168 10850 ANOKA COUNTY TREASURY D May Broadband 112.50 04/18 04/19/2018 8169 30480 CENTENNIAL UTILITIES Mar Gas, Water(Station 1) 328.68 04/18 04/19/2018 8170 31137 CONNEXUS ENERGY 2/27-3/29 Electric(Station 1) 534.19 04/18 04/19/2018 8171 40045 DELTA DENTAL May EMS Coord. Dental Ins Prem 196.25 04/18 04/19/2018 8172 80280 HEALTH PARTNERS May Hospital Ins Prem (Chief &A 1,528.32 04/18 04/19/2018 8173 120443 THE LINCOLN NATL LIFE INS C May EMS Coord. Life Ins Prem (E 343.61 04/18 04/19/2018 8174 190075 SHI INTERNATIONAL CORP 2016 Windows Software 243.00 04/18 04/19/2018 8175 220200 VERIZON WIRELESS 3/5-4/4 Monthly Phone (Asst. Chie 53.47 04/18 04/19/2018 8176 220300 VOL. FIREFIGHTERS BENEFIT Chad Payment Volunteer Premiu 11.00 04/18 04/19/2018 8177 11565 ASPEN MILLS, INC Tschida pant 402.45 04/18 04/19/2018 8178 130205 MMKR, INC PROGRESS BILLING-2017 Audit 4,000.00 04/18 04/19/2018 8179 60650 FRATTALLONE'S HARDWARE S Return and purchase of battery pa 64.67 Grand Totals: 7,818.14 Payroll Checks#8163-8167 M = Manual Check, V=Void Check 60 CITY OF CENTERVILLE REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION enteryi(Ce E77 Agenda Item# Department: Requested Council Meeting Date: Administration April 25, 2018 TITLE OF ISSUE: Anoka County Radio Club Use of Laurie LaMotte Memorial Park Parking Lot for their Annual Field Day BACKGROUND AND SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION: For several years the Radio Club has been utilizing the LaMotte Park Parking Lot for their Annual Field Day without issues. It is anticipate that this request will not deviate from this practice. Their Annual Field Day exercises benefit the community as a whole. This group has been very active in the past and vital to the safety of all volunteers, participants and spectators at the Fete des Lacs activities. COST AND SOURCE(S) OF FUNDING: N/A REQUESTED COUNCIL ACTION: Recommend Approval as in years past. For Clerk's Use: SUPPORTED DOCUMENTS ATTACHED Motion By: Resolution Ordinance Contract Minutes Plan Map Second By: Vote Record: A e Nay King Other(specify) Love Paar Koski Montain Administration Department Use: Refer to: Consent Tabled Until: Regular Other: 61 CITY OF CENTERVILLE REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION enterviffe Agenda Its f Department: Requested Council Meeting Date: Administration April 25,20 1,8 ITOF ISSUE: Authorization for Staff to Enter Into an Agreement on Behalf of the City with,,Anoka County for Res.Recyclin BACKGROUND AND SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION: On an annual basis the City of Centerville enters into an agreement with Anoka County for Residential Recycling for receiving funding from the State of Minnesota(SCORE)funding. This year's amount is$16,755. The agreement addresses an facets from reporting to requirements and is designed to assist municipalities in meeting their recycling goals established by Anoka County. �COST A�TNID SOURCE(S) OF FUNDING: N/A REQUESTED COUNCIL ACTION: ,Authorization by the City Council to approve Staff entering in to the presented contract on behalf ofthe City with review,by Legal Counsel in regards to form and legality. For Clerk's Use: SUPPORTED DOCUMENTS ATTACHED Resolution Ordinance Contract Minute's Plan Map " e Record-, A e in the (specio, 9 Love Application for Exempt Permit ......................... Paar Koski ......................... Montain Administration Department Use: Consent Tabled'Until: Regular 62 H LIM A N SERVICES DtV � SION Date: April 5,2018 To: Mal Apacling Coordinators From: Sue Ddf, Solid Waste Specialist Regarding: Municipal Contracts for 2018, Funding and Goals The 2018 Residential Recycling Agreements include a fixed base of$10,000 for each municipality and $5.00 per household(HH). In addition,targeted program fands are available for specific program areas and funds may be used for problem materials and yard waste/organics. The household count is based on the latest population and household estimate available from the Metropolitan Council, This funding allocation is not dependent upon the receipt of the second SCORE allocation. The county will use reserve funds if the second grant payment is not received in the spring of2018, The 2018 funding includes enhancement funds for the following program areas: Monthly/Quarterly Drop-off Events—$10,000 or$15,000 depending on HH's General Enhancement Grant$I/HH Organics Collection$0.50/HH if no organics drop-off or curbside program Organics Collection$1/HH if there is an organics drop-off or curbside program Additional Grant Request up to $30,000 The 2018 municipal recycling goal is 210 pounds per person for single family households (up to 4 units) and 160 pounds per person for multi-unit households (5 is or more). This goal reflects the estimated tonnage needed to assist the county in achieving its recycling goal as established by the State of Minnesota. The goals have been set to reflect the differences between single family and multi-unit housing. One copy of the contract has been enclosed for signature by your municipality. Please obtain the necessary signatures, The funding amounts you requested on Attachment B and the final funding award,Attachment C, are included as part of this contract. Mail the signed copy back too department and we will obtain remaining signatures. We will return the original to you once fully-executed, We will not be able to reimburse any expenditures until we have a signed contract returned by your municipality. Thank you for your cooperation and efforts to reduce waste and increase the amount of material recycled in our county. Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions regarding this information. 63 Anoka County Contract# C0006180 2018 AGREEMENT FOR RESIDENTIAL RECYCLING PROGRAM THIS AGREEMENT made and entered into on the tat day of January, 2018, notwithstanding the date of the signatures of the parties, between the COUNTY OF ANOKA, State of Minnesota, hereinafter referred to as the "COUNTY", and the CITY OF CENTERVILLE, hereinafter referred to as the "MUNICIPALITY". WITNESSETH: WHEREAS,the County will receive funding from the State of Minnesota pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 115 .557 (hereinafter"SCORE funds") during 2013; and WHEREAS, pursuant to legislation a portion of the SCORE funds must be used to encourage recycling of source-separated compostable materials, and WHEREAS, the County will also receive funding pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 473,8441 (hereinafter'"LD funds") during 2018; and WHEREAS, the County also has additional budgeted program funding available to supplement SCORE and LRDG funds for solid waste recycling programs, so that the available amount for the Residential Recycling Program is $1,551,029'. and WHEREAS, the County Solid Waste Master Plan 2012 (Master Plan 2012) and MPCA Metropolitan Solid Waste Management Policy Plan 2010-2030 state that MSW generated in the County that is not reused, recycled or composted, will be processed to the extent that processing capacity is available', and WHEREAS,the Master Plan 2012 was developed with the participation of a representative from the Municipality staff, and the Municipality is required to develop and implement programs, practices, or methods designed to meet waste abatement goals by Minn, Stat, § 115A.551, good 2a. (b). WHEREAS, in 2017, the County engaged in a process of drafting an updated Master Plan which will be submitted to the MBCA for review and approval in 2018. The anticipated Master Plan 2018 will supersede the current Master Plan 2012 upon approval. The Master Plan 2018 has been developed with the participation of a representative from the Municipality staff, and the Municipality will be required to develop and implement programs, practices, or methods designed to meet waste abatement goals by Minn, Stat. § 115 .551, Subd 2a. (b). WHEREAS, the County wishes to assist the Municipality in meeting recycling goals established by Anoka County by providing said SCORE and LRC G funds to cities and townships in the County for solid waste recycling programs. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and promises contained in this Agreement, the parties mutually agree to the following terms and conditions'. 64 1 PURPOSE. The purpose of this Agreement is to provide for cooperation between the County and the Municipality to implement solid waste recycling programs in the Municipality which will help the County and member municipalities meet the goals set in the current Anoka County Solid Waste Management Master Plan. 2, TERM. The term of this Agreement is from January 1, 2018 through December 31, 2018, unless earlier terminated as provided herein. 3, DEFINITIONS. a, "Eligible Expenses" means those expenses for recycling projects/programs and education and outreach and for priority issue activities that assist the municipality in collecting additional tons to help meet its recycling goal. Such expenses may include administration, but only to the extent of salary and legal costs of personnel who are directly working on the planning, implementation and promotion of eligible activities as detailed in this definition. b. "Full Service Recycling Drop-off Center" means centralized permanent drop-off center that is open at least two times a week and accepts at least four types of materials beyond traditional curbside recyclables, i.e,,. mattresses, appliances, scrap metal, carpet, furniture, source-separated compostable materials, electronics, etc, c. "Mixed municipal solid waste" (C 1) shall have the meaning set forth in Minn. Star. §1 15A.03, ubd. 21, d, "Multi-unit households" means households within apartment complexes, condominiums, townhomes, mobile homes and senior housing complexes. e, "Opportunity to Recycle" means providing recycling and curbside pickup or collection centers for recyclable materials for residents, including single and multi-family dwellings, as required by Minn. Stat. § 115A.552. ubd. 1. f. "Problem material" shall have the meaning set forth in Minn. Stat, § 115 .03, Subd, 24a. g, "Public entity waste" shall have the meaning set forth in Minn. Stat, § 115A,471 (b). kl. "Quasi-Municipal event" means community festivals which appear to the public to be supported and run by the Municipality but in fact are sponsored or co-sponsored by an independent non-profit 501c (3) organization, for example, the Anoka Halloween Parade. i. "Recyclable materials" shall have the meaning set forth in Minn. Stat. § 115A.03, ubd. 25a, j. "Recycling" shall have the meaning set forth in Minn. Stat, § 115 .03, Subd, 25b, k. "Refuse-derived fuel" (RDF) as defined by Minn. Stat, § 115A,03, Subd, 25d., or other material that is destroyed by incineration is not a recyclable material. 1. "Source-separated compostable materials" (commonly called "organics") shall have the meaning set forth in Minn. Stat. § 115 .03, Subd. 32a, m. "Yard waste" shall have the meaning set forth in Minn. Stat, § 115A.03, good. 38. 2 65 4. PROGRAM. The Municipality Shall develop and implement a residential solid waste recycling program adequate to meet the Municipality's annual recycling goal of 409 tons of recyclable materials as established by the County. The Municipality shall ensure that the recyclable materials collected are delivered to processors or end markets for recycling. a. The Municipal recycling program shall include the following components-, L Each household (including multi-unit households) in the Municipality shall have the Opportunity to Recycle at least four broad types of materials, including but not limited to, paper (including cardboard/paperboard cartons), glass, plastic, metal and textiles. H. The recycling (including any organics) program shall be operated in compliance with all applicable federal, state, and local laws, ordinances, rules and regulations. Ill. The Municipality shall implement a public information program that contains at least the following components, (1) One promotion is to be mailed to each household focused exclusively on the Municipality's recycling program; (2) One promotion advertising recycling opportunities available for residents is to be included in the Municipality's newsletter or local newspaper, and (3) Two community outreach activities at Municipal or Quasi-Municipal events to inform residents about recycling opportunities. IS. The public information components listed above shall focus on all recyclable materials and the various opportunities to recycle within the Municipality. The Municipality shall incorporate Rethink Recycling images and use the toolkits provided when preparing promotional materials. The Municipality, on an ongoing basis, shall identify new residents and provide detailed information on the recycling opportunities available to these new residents. The County shall work with the Municipality on promotional materials to coordinate messages. The Municipality shall provide promotional materials for review prior to publication to ensure accuracy. v. The Municipality shall regularly attend the monthly Solid Waste Abatement Advisory Team meetings per year. vi. The Municipality shall offer one or two spring and tall clean up/recycl Ing drop-off event(s) where items not normally accepted at the curb are collected for recycling. If the Municipality is hosting a monthly drop-off as described in ,.bei below, the spring/fall cleanup/recycling drop-off events may be included within that program. 3 66 b. The Municipality is encouraged to expand its recycling program to include one or more of the following components in order to receive additional funding, I. Organize month ly/quarterly recycling drop-off events which can be held in conjunction with a neighboring municipality(ie ) on a cooperative basis for the citizens of both/all municipalities. H. Provide a community event recycling program, which at a minimum would consist of providing recycling opportunities at all Municipal sponsored or Quasi-Municipal events and festivals as required by Minn. Stat. § 115A.151. The feasibility of adding organics collection at the event will be explored and if feasible, implemented as an enhancement to the waste abatement program, iii. Provide the opportunity for citizens to engage in recycling activities at Municipal and Quasi-Municipal facilities as required by Minn. Stat, § 115A,151 such as athletic fields and public centers. is. Organize and manage a Full Service Recycling Drop-off Center, v. Develop enhanced recycling promotion and assistance for multi-units. al. Develop additional opportunities for Source-Separated Compostable Materials collection. vii. Develop and implement additional opportunities to recycle bulky and problem materials (e.g, appliances, carpet, electronics, mattresses and scrap metal) from residents on an on-going basis either curbside or at a drop-off, c. If the Municipality's recycling program did not achieve the Municipality's recycling goals as established by the County for the prior calendar year, the Municipality shall work with the County to prepare a plan to achieve the recycling goals set forth in this Agreement. d. The Municipality's recycling program shall be limited to residential programming for funding reimbursements under this Agreement. The County will not reimburse business recycling programming or household hazardous waste programming by the Municipality. Any inquiries or requests regarding these topics should be sent to the County for response, a. In addition to the above requirements designed to increase residential recycling opportunities, the Municipality shall provide recycling opportunities in all municipal buildings including but not limited to, city offices, public meeting rooms and parks, as required by Minn. Stat, § 115A151. If items collected through the Municipal recycling program prove to be contaminated or not recyclable, those items shall be treated as public entity waste and must be processed at a resource recovery facility.' Minn. Stat, §§ 11 5A.46 ,115A,471 and 473.848. See pages 44-45 of the 2012 Anoka County Solid to Management Master Plan regarding the requirements for Public Entity Waste, 4 67 f, Pursuant to Minn, Stat. §§ 115 . 464 115A. 71 and 473.848, all waste generated by city/township government activities (including city/town halls, public works and public safety buildings, parks, and libraries, and for city/townships that arrange for waste services on behalf of their residents (organized collection)) shall be delivered to a waste processing plant for disposal as long as capacity is available, Failure to comply with this provision shall constitute a breach of this Grant Agreement resulting in the loss of all Grant Funding unless, pursuant to statute, the Municipality has conferred with the County and developed a plan to comply within a reasonable period of time,2 5, REPORTING. The Municipality shall submit the following reports semi-annually to the County no later than July 20, 2018 and January 10, 2019. a, An accounting of the amount of waste which has been recycled as a result of the Municipality's activities and the efforts of other community programs, redemption centers and drop-off centers. For recycling programs, the Municipality shall certify the number of tons of each recyclable material which has been collected and the number of tons of each recyclable material which has been marketed. For recycling programs run by other persons or entities, the Municipality shall also provide documentation on forms provided by the County showing the tons of materials that were recycled by the Municipality's residents through these other programs. The Municipality shall keep detailed records documenting the disposition of all recyclable materials collected pursuant to this Agreement. The Municipality shall also report the number of cubic yards or tons of yard waste collected for composting, chipping, or land spreading, together with a description of the methodology used for calculations. Any other material removed from the waste stream by the Municipality, i.e. tires and used oil, shall also be reported separately. b. Information regarding any revenue received from sources other than the County for the Municipality's recycling programs. c. Copies of all promotional materials that have been prepared by the Municipality during the to of this Agreement to promote its recycling programs, d. The Municipality agrees to support County efforts in obtaining hauler reports by ensuring compliance through ordinance, contract or license requirements and the ability to exercise punitive actions, if needed. The Municipality agrees to furnish the County with additional reports in form and at frequencies requested by the County for financial evaluation, program management purposes, and reporting to the State of Minnesota. 6, BILLING AND PAYMENT PROCEDURE. The Municipality shall submit itemized invoices semi-annually to the County for abatement activities no later than July 20, 2018 and January 10, 2019, Costs not billed by January 10, 2019 may not be eligible for funding. The invoices shall be paid in accordance with standard County procedures, subject to the approval of the Anoka County Board of Commissioners. T ELIGIBILITY FOR FUNDS. The Municipality is entitled to receive reimbursement for eligible expenses, less revenues or other reimbursement received, for eligible activities up 2 Ibid. �8 to the project maximum as computed below, which shall not exceed $16,755.00. The project maximum for eligible expenses shall be computed as follows: a, A base amount of$10,000 and $5 per household for recycling activities only, b. Enhancement activities as provided according to the schedule in Attachment A and the applications in Attachment B for each of the following services'. Full Service Recycling Drop-off Center, Spring/Fall or Monthly/Quarterly Drop-off Events-, Municipal Park Recycling, Community Event Recycling', Special Curbside Pickup Events; Multi- unit Recycling; , and Organics Collection', c. After considering the 2018 Municipal Funding Request applications (Attachment B) designating the additional Grant Projects that the City will undertake in the upcoming year, and cle Including an additional change order contingency of up to 10% of the total of the total base funding, Monthly/Quarterly Drop-offs, and General Enhancement grants. For the Municipality's convenience in determining the amounts for the 2018 Municipal Funding Request, a work plan is included with the Packet. Notwithstanding any provision to the contrary, the County reserves the right to reduce the funding provided hereunder in the event the City does not undertake and complete the additional Grant Projects referenced in Attachment B. The County also reserves the ability to assess the programs and reallocate unused SCORE and LRDG funds mid-year if any participating municipality demonstrates the need for the funding and funds are available, 8, RECORDS. The Municipality shall maintain financial and other records and accounts in accordance with requirements of the County and the State of Minnesota. The Municipality shall maintain strict accountability of all funds and maintain records of all receipts and disbursements. Such records and accounts shall be maintained in a form which will permit the tracing of funds and program income to final expenditure, The Municipality shall maintain records sufficient to reflect that all funds received under this Agreement were expended in accordance with Minn, Stat. § 115 4557, ubd. 2, for residential solid waste recycling purposes. The Municipality shall also maintain records of the quantities of materials recycled. All records and accounts shall be retained as provided by law, but in no event for a period of less than five years from the last receipt of payment from the County pursuant to this Agreement. 9, AUDIT. Pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 16C.05, the Municipality shall allow the County or other persons or agencies authorized by the County, and the State of Minnesota, including the Legislative Auditor or the State Auditor, access to the records of the Municipality at reasonable hours, including all books, records, documents, and accounting procedures and practices of the Municipality relevant to the subject matter of the Agreement, for purposes of audit. In addition, the County shall have access to the project sit (s), if any, at reasonable hours. 10. GENERAL PROVISIONS. a, In performing the provisions of this Agreement, both parties agree to comply with all applicable federal, state or local laws, ordinances, rules, regulations or standards established by any agency or special governmental unit which are now or hereafter promulgated insofar as they relate to performance of the provisions of this Agreement. 6 69 In addition, the Municipality shall comply with all applicable requirements of the State of Minnesota for the use of SCORE funds provided to the Municipality by the County under this Agreement. The Municipality shall also comply with all relevant portions of the current Anoka County Solid Waste Management Master Plan, and shall participate in the preparation of the successor Master Plans, b. No person shall illegally, on the grounds of race, creed, color, religion, sex, marital status, public assistance status, sexual preference, handicap, age or national origin, be excluded from full employment rights in, participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be otherwise subjected to unlawful discrimination under any program, service or activity hereunder, The Municipality agrees to take affirmative action so that applicants and employees are treated equally with respect to the following: employment, upgrading, demotion, transfer, recruitment, layoff, termination, selection for training, rates of pay, and other forms of compensation. c. If the Municipality utilizes the services of a subcontractor for purposes of meeting requirements herein, the Municipality shall be responsible for the performance of all such subcontracts and shall ensure that the subcontractors perform fully the terms of the subcontract. The agreement between the Municipality and a subcontractor shall obligate the subcontractor to comply fully with the terms of this Agreement, d. It is understood and agreed that the entire agreement is contained herein and that this Agreement supersedes all oral and written agreements and negotiations between the parties relating to the subject matter hereof, a. Any amendments, alterations, variations, modifications, or waivers of this Agreement shall be valid only when they have been reduced to writing, duly signed by the parties. f. Contracts let and purchases made under this Agreement shall be made by the Municipality in conformance with all laws, rules, and regulations applicable to the Municipality. g, The provisions of this Agreement are severable. If any paragraph, section, subdivision, sentence, clause or phrase of this Agreement is for any reason held to be contrary to law, such decision shall not affect the remaining portion of this Agreement, h. Nothing in this Agreement shall be construed as creating the relationship of co- partners, joint venturers, or an association between the County and the Municipality, nor shall the Municipality, its employees, agents or representatives be considered employees, agents, or representatives of the County for any purpose. I t. PUBLICATION. The Municipality shall acknowledge the financial assistance of the County on all promotional materials, reports and publications relating to the activities funded under this Agreement, by including the following acknowledgement: "Funded by the Anoka County Board of Commissioners and State SCORE funds." The Municipality shall provide copies of all promotional materials funded by SCORE funds. The County shall provide all printed public information pieces about County programs, A Municipality shall not modify County publications related to business recycling, household hazardous waste management or the County compost sites. 7 70 Information about the County's business recycling program, household hazardous waste management program or County compost sites that a Municipality plans to publish in a Municipal communication, printed or electronic, shall be provided to the County for review and approved by the County prior to publication to ensure accuracy and consistency, 12. INDEMNIFICATION. The County agrees to indemnify, defend, and hold the Municipality harmless from all claims, demands, and causes of action of any kind or character, including the cost of defense thereof, resulting from the acts or omissions of its public officials, officers, agents, employees, and contractors relating to activities performed by the County under this Agreement, The Municipality agrees to indemnify, defend, and hold the County harmless from all claims, demands, and causes of action of any kind or character, including the cost of defense thereof, resulting from the acts or omissions of its public officials, officers, agents, employees, and contractors relating to activities performed by the Municipality under this Agreement. The provisions of this subdivision shall survive the termination or expiration of the term of this Agreement. 13, TERMINATION. This Agreement may be terminated by mutual written agreement of the parties at, by either party, with or without cause, by giving not less than seven (7) days' written notice, delivered by mail or in person to the other party, specifying the date of termination. If this Agreement is terminated, assets acquired in whole or in part with funds provided under this Agreement shall be the property of the Municipality so long as said assets are used by the Municipality for the purpose of a landfill abatement program approved by the County. IN APITNESS WHEREOF the parties hereunto set their heads as of the dates first written above: CITY OF CEEE COUNTY OF ANOKA Rhoads Sivarajah, Chair Agmo.:.� Anoka County Board of Commissioners . Date: xx K�u __x xr� xxxx____ xxxxx____xxx x wwwwwwwwwv: By',—_ wwwwwv wwwwwwwwv -m----- jery Sorna Municipality's Clerk COUnty Administrator �x sK K t � yyyyyyyyy� -----------------,��mmm ________________________ xxxxxxx....................................................... Approved as to form and legality: Approved as to fora and legality: By: Kathryn n M Timm Assistant County Attorney kmt contracMintegrated waste contr ctrl E grantsl2018\CO006180 2018 SCORE Centerville 2 Attachment C Grant Funding Decision 2018 Grant Year The City of CENTERVILLE is eligible for a total of$28,781.00 for their Municipal program abatement efforts in 2018. The City did not submit a timely application for funds (Attachment M. The base funding amount that the City is eligible for without submitting Attachment B is $16,755,004 The approved total funding for the 2018 Residential Recycling Program based on the budgeted expenditures set out in Attachment B ($0) and the eligible amount is$ 16,755.00. ELIGIBLE flRE%LESTED AwardDen l Base Amount: (no application needed) $16,755 $ $ 16,755 Monthly/Quarterly Drop off Events 10,000 0 0 General Enhancement grant 1,351 0 0 Organics Grant 675,50 0 0 Total $ 28,781.50 $- $ 16,755 Reviewed by: Dated: lynbm T Assistant County Attorney 73 61 1 '4 pa 9888981888 9 8 8 9 s Li 0 R PR R R R R R R F4 ZZipp-„„.� w E A cr Ma w CL U Ei 5L A 2L =r G :9 t� 02 8 s 8 91 9L G) SL SL sa —————————— 0 2 2 2 0 74 CITY OF CENTERVILLE REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION oterville (I W ,Agenda Item# Department: Requested Council Meeting Does: Administration April 25,2018 D Ad p to e a r tra n is'" tr t 'on UE Authorization to field Rattle Within the City of Centerville -11 t a City of C r BACXGROUTND AND SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION- NT L I C Fe V a ier u I Fs a,r yS ier and Curt Spurner, Rumble Industries desire to he d a raffle on July 21,2018 in TITLE OF ISSUE: uthorization to I-lold It i BAC GROUND AND ,UPPLE S Misters rs S a j n Cu p Misters G Span aid rt S an R rable rid I p munstion with a t 0 r 1 0 a nonstration,event that will be held at their location(2030 Main Street). conjunction with a skateboarding dern n,tration eve They felt that with the events being held in town associated with Fete des Lacs it would be an opportune time to 0 a to tiara host an event benefiting their business and the community. A subsequent Special Event Application will be] submitted shortly, COST AND SOURCE(S) OF FUNDING; N/A FEQITESTED COUNCIL ACTION: Authorization by the City Council to approve their request for holding a ra,ffl--a on July 21,2018. For Clerk's Use: SUPPORTED DOCUMENTS ATTACHED xr ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution Ordinance Contract Minutes Plan Map Vote Record: A-e King otner(sty ecify)..LG220 Application for Exempt Permit Love .................................................... Ever Koski Montain Administration Department Use: Consent ............................................................. Regular Tabled Until: 75 MINNESOTA LAWFUL GAMBLING I 1 LG220 Application for Exempt Permit Page I of 2 Auesempt permit may be issued to a nonprofit Application Fee (non-refundable) organization that: !Ica on I b f t]e re Applications are processed in the order received. If the application 'a • concl=b;tearful gambling on five or fewer days,and on' 1 $50 P n is postmarked or received 30 days or more before the event,the • awards less than $50,000 in prizes durning a calendar application fee is$100; otherwise the fee is SIGN. re year. Due to the high volume of exempt applications, payment of If total raffle prize value for the calendar year will! be $1,500 or less,contact the Licensing Specialist assigned to additional fees prior to 30 days before your event will not expedite calling 651-539-1,900. your unty service, nor one telephone requests for expedited service accepted, coby ORGANIZATION INFORMATION ------------------------------- -------------- Previous Gambling AAU�, r. X92403 Permit Numbs ............... .................................................................... ----------------- .............................. Minnesota Tax ID Federal Employer ID Number, if any: ------------------------ Number(FEIN), if any. ..........:.:.............................................................."I'l""I'll""I'll'll""I'll""I'll",'ll"'ll................................................................................- pity. I rnct�t --- State: MR Zip- 55446 County.� Hennepin -ty— ----------------------- -----------— Name of Chief Executive Officer(CEO); Rich Berg,President -------------------------- CEO Daytime Phone:763-286-0507 CEO Email: RBerg3710@aol,com (permit will he emailed to this email address unless otherwise indicated below) Email permit to (if other than the CEO):rpmcmn@yahoo,com —--------------- NONPROFIT STATUS Type of Nonprofit Organization (check one): rraternal Religious Veterans other Nonprofit Organization _________w_ -------------- Attach a copy of able of the following showing proof of nonprofit status, --------- ----------------- _______.w (Do NOr attach a sales tax exempt status or federal employer ID number,as they are not proof of nonprofit status.) _=.tedbel w) ................j NO PROFIT STATUS 0 IT Type of N (In profit Organization Erate 7 al .......... .. A current calendar year certificate of Good Standing Don't have a copy? Obtain this certificate from: MN Secretary of State, Business Services Division Secretary of State andwate,phone numbers: 60 Empire Drive, Suite 100 ww-w—so-s—sig-Le--milama St. Paul, NO 55103 651-296-2803,or toll free 1-877-551-6767 IRS income tax exemption (501(c))letter In your organizations name Don't have is copy? To obtain a copy of your federal income tax exempt letter, have an organization officer contact the IRS toll free at 1-877-829-5500. IRS-Affiliate of national,statewide,or International parent nonprofit organization (charter) If your organization falls under a parent organization,attach copies of BDIb,of the following: 1. IRS letter showing your parent organization is a nonprofit 501(c)organization with a group ruling; and 2. the charter or letter from your parent organization recognizing your organization as a subordinate. GAMBLING PREMISES INFORMATION ------- ---- i Name of premises where the gambling event will be conducted (for raffles, list the site where the drawing will take place): Rumble House ------------ 'a subordinate. ---- ...................................... ...................a Physical Address(do not use P.O. box): _4031)Msin sfhol ............"I1111111111111111111111-,--I------------------ .................................................................... -----------------Z.......................................... Check one: city-.S�ante no -------—----- -—----------------- zip: 55038 County: Anoka Township: --—-°-__________ Zip: '11-11-..."I'll I Countyv Date(s)of activity (for raffles, indicate the date of the drawing): Elul Y2�,2Q'I4_..--------------------- Check each type of gambling activity that your organization will conduct, E]Bingo =Paddlewheels =Pull-Tabs =11pboards EZ1 Raffle Gambling equipment for bingo paper, bingo boards,raffle boards, paddlewheels, pull-tabs,and tipboards must be obtained from to distributor licensed by the Minnesota Gambling Control Board, EXCEPTION, Bingo hard cards and bingo ball selection devices may be borrowed from another organization authorized to conduct bingo. To find a licensed distributor,go to oniver.garowevIgueb and click on Decratutors under the List of Licensees tab,or call 651-539-1900. ---------------- 76 LG220 Application for Exempt Permit Page 2 of 2 --—------------- ........n......................................._"' L LOCAL UNIT OF GOVERNMENT ACKNOWLEDGMENT (required before submitting application to 0 Mill the Minnesota Gambling Control Board) CITY APPROVAL COUNTY APPROVAL for a gambling premises for a gambling premises located within city limits located me township The application is acknowledged with no waiting period, he application is acknowledged with no waiting period, The application is acknowledged villith a 30-day wafting he application is acknowledged with a 30-day waiting period, and allows the Board to issue per after 30 days period, and allows the Board to issue as perruit after (60 days for a t class city), 30 days, E]The application is denied, he application is denied, Print City Print County Name, Signature ofCfty Pere nnel: Signature of County Personnel: ................................ Thle4 Date, Title: Date, TOWNSHIP (if required by the county) On behalf of the township, I acknowledge that the organization is applying for exempted gambling activity within the township The city or county must sign before limits. (A township has no statutory authority to approve or submitting application to the deny an application, per when, Statutes, section 349.213,), Gambling Control Board. ............... Signature of Township Officer: Title: Datvx ______________________________ ...... ........... ................................................................................................... .......................................................-_.-.._1................................ CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER'S SIGNATURE (required) ._.._.._.....w..................................... This infigirtnatiOn provided In this application is completeray.d the best of my knowledge. I acknorioledge that the financial report will be completed and returned to' he in days tfte eased r date, 3 I Chief Executive officer's Signature, Data, —Pr .. ............. ­ ................................................... ..................................... (signs li-ke ust b a al ature; as may notTicin) 1 Print Name, _!tich Berg .... — ............................................. ........................................................ -------------------------------------..................... ....................................... REQUIREMENTS 1HAILAPPLICATION AND ATTACHMENTS ---------------- Complete a separate application for: Mail application with: • all gambling conducted on two or or more consecutive days, or ................a copy of your proof of nonprofit status; and • all gambling conducted on one day, application fee(non-refundable). if the application is Only one application is required if one or mors raffle drawings are postmarked or received 30 days or,for before the ovent, conducted on the same day. the application Fee is$100; otherwise the fee is$150, Financial report to be completed within 30 days after the Make check payable to State of Minnesota. I gambling activity Is done, Tara Minnesota Gambling Control Board I A financial report form will be mailed with your permit. Complete 1711. West County Road B,Suite 300 South and return the financial report form to the Gambling Control Roseville, MN 55113 Board. Questions? Your organization must keep all exempt records and reports for Call the Licensing Section of the Garnbhng Control Board at 3-1/2 Boom (Minn, Statutes, section 349,166,suled, 2(f)), 651-539-1900, .........................................................................................................................................­.................................................................... ---------------------------------- ........................................................... Data privacyfo notice he inrmation r 'existed appmgraam lication. Your antion's nam avail enc of public Safety;Adol-ne.y General; off this form and any attachments)win be used address will be public WiformatiOn when recahoad commissioners of Administration,Minnesota ; by the Gambillng Cantrall Board(Board)to by the nes, Aro wli other information pvided will Management&Budget and Revenueaffislative del: Zia long to L lantrilne Your orgam tions cloafificat: be private data about your organization until the Auditor, national and international gambling be involved fn lawful gambling activities in Board issues the permit, other the Board hisrurv; regulatory agencies;anyone pursuant to court Minnesota, Your,organization has the fight to the pernift,all information provided will becorne order;other individuals and agencies specifically at se to supply the,information; malsever, if public, If the Board does not issue a permit,all authorized by State to federal law to have access your moarnzation refuses to supply this information provided riernaMr private,wini the to the information; individuals and agencies for information,the Board may not be able to exception of your ear gairliZation'a name and which law or legal order outdarizew a new use or determine your organizatlons qualifications and, address which will remain public, Private data sharinn of inforrivition utter tals notice were as a consequence, may retrace to issue a permit, about your organization are available to Board given;and anyone with your written consent, If your organization supplies the information mernbers,Board staff whose work mairares requested,the Board will be able to process me access to the inforroatior, Minnessim's Depart. ............ This form will,)a made available to alternative forrriat(i,elarge print, braille)upon request, Ail art sat olawrowuh;arripliever 77 I' r r I i Of t oft Minnesota rt :t Certificate of Good Standing .t- t, Steve Simon, Secretary of State of Minnesota,do certify that: The business entity listed below was filed pursuant to the Minnesom Chapter listed below with the Office of al�ll the Secretary of Stas on the date lits below and that this business entity is registered t � do business aud is in good standing at the time this certificate is issued. I I I}? IIS Name: renegade pis Minnesota f !�i Date Filed: 6/13/2008 -ik � File arra i� Minnesota Statutes, Chapter: 3 t"7 Home Jurisdiction: Minnesota �d d'. Ix, This certificate has been issued on: 03/12/2018 III-I +ILL�M I- ITS" y � J `x°Y 1 P I I } e FL 4 ,. . Steve mo II. Secretary of State F I.:I State ofMinnesota F F- i I. I} 11 II` +' n is IF•.� J 78 411512118 Business Filing Details Minnesota Business Name Renegade Pigs M/C Minnesota Business }gyp MIN Statute Nonprofit Corporation(Domestic) 31 Pile Number Home Jurisdiction 2890567-2 Minnesota Piling Date Status 06/13/2008 Active/In Good Standing Renewal Due Date Registered Office Address 12/31/2018 3300 Plymouth Blvd#46051 Plymouth,IVIN 55446 UFA Registered pit President Rich Berg Rich Berg 3300 Plymouth Blvd#46051 Plymouth,PIN 55446 SIR Filing History Select the it r1 you would 1d lil to order Filing Date Piling Effective Bete 06/13/2008 Original Filing-Nonprofit Corporation(Domestic) 06/13/2008 Nonprofit Corporation(Domestic) Business Name (Business Name.Renegade Pips M/C Minnesota) 03/30/2009 Registered Office and/or Agent @ Nonprofit Corporation (Domestic) 79 hps,./,I bi rtal.so , tate, n.us/B sines ` earchOe llani€ €id=62c9l5O7-9 d4-e llMab -(1019 b7f 1/ 411812018 Business Filing Details Filing Date Filing Ve Effective Date V, 2/27/2013 Involuntary Dissolution-Nonprofit Corporation (Domestic) 4/26/2013 Annual Reinstatement-Nonprofit Corporation (Domestic) 1/3/2017 Registered Office and/or Agent-Nonprofit Corporation (Domestic) 2/22/2017 Involuntary Dissolution-Nonprofit Corporation (Domestic) 10/23/2017 Annual Reinstatement-Nonprofit Corporation (Domestic) 0 2018 Office of the Minnesota Secretary of State-Terms&Conditions 80 h.t',ps-./imbis por'kazo&state.mn,us/B�sinessISeerr hDalails?filingGuid=62cgl507-92d4-eDll-a886-OOlec94te7f 212 CITY OF CENTERVILLE REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION enterville Agenda Item# Department: Requested Council Meeting Date, Administration April 25,2018 Send Rem TITLE OF ISSUE: EO EDem R Peg us i l;d 0 ril�5 imen" A A .2 dra nistran IT 8 d Ra fle With d' r ND 7ELF S ore f St. 11 Fth Tl urch of St. Genevieve is requesting to hold their annual raffle held in coittunction with Authorization to Hold Raffle Within the City of Centerville BACKGROUNID AND SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION: F er r g s , C a er Greg Esty, Ch h Ge eN W t eir G ty Dinne 'r ac 'vent Application will be. , .he ule their Annuet Ch Dinner scheduled for August 19,2018. A subsequent ill, in th Ann al Chicken d w] submitted,shortly. COST AND SOURCE(S) OF FUNDING: COST A R E F:F: I ) 0 (S C OU N/A QU S C Authorization COUNCIL ACTION: 'T COU -CIL T1 Council Authorization,by the City Council to approve their request for holding a.raffle on August 19, 2018 in ut orho City Co il A h onion by the C1 con j eti wit air I C conjunction with their Annual Chicken Dinner event. For Clerk's Use: SUPPORTED DOS NT ATTACHED ............ ..................... Resolution ordinance Contract Minutes Plan Witip Vote Record: Ave King other(specify) L1 Apor Exempt Permit Love plication f Poor ......................... Koski Administration Department Use:Montain Consent 'fabled Until: F] Rel-pilar 81 i h..x.x April 17, 2018 Centerville City Council oil City of Centerville 1880 Man Street Centerville, MN 55038 ubjact: St. Genevieve xs Parish Festival Sunday, august 19, 201 Dear Council Members: We are requesting your support in approving our gaming permit for our annual parish Festival, Enclosed is the completed form. We respectfully request your signature and the return of the form to us. Please fool [free to contact the undersigned with any questions. Sincerely, Andrew A. Mcicher St. Genevieve Festival Coordinator 952-927-2431 days 82 W220 ��� f� fn e „� �nrrt Permit r_ ; ... ,xv__ v.n - xx ------------------------- x r r flf„ tff tltxixif� f (tt r=: rpriocfassed in s t z� thpEoWan condwis ...=o-.3 gambling orf 29 x.. , fewer close. and .. q, received„ed 3 dap S nure , .."efe the _dtr L r.. „ t j. �. tr:ea.:.z.. has than ,rr,:; ,'�"„. H., s._',S <" >.:s .„x....s fce' is .f fry xti'verafhal We .xuw ... $!50” •,” < t . ., :x for Its ..az #�..: :tom Dye E 'z ��F ," r r e.,, „4... a r w t ti r. ". ...::Hf 1 ley .."..: n K 6505390900,,1 -- �sts "rrr .... �.s t z` a Mfr 1111, -:9"39-Ps . ''r _.... ___........................... r," any" r any- tSam -- t£- r or Executive OHIcer r,r rib r= ........................... , ..a3'€".?..,wili be,.rn„.ri..r„; .„to*=A Ad'."r...... ...., es.. A100410 Wa0ag oiif p ..: „..-________•_____________....................... ...... ."..........,... ______::::::::::. _.......... .:..... ETVR; w.. x of hka4vailt a.,r gar ek z.: rrrrrrrrr: ,...---- ., rrf r. '�+.r NOT.:::"'...:.`..r; < :�.h.r.".Asi..., .."t exempt status,..„< .Word!x..,c..t..x...y a.x, r'v: ..number, _ they ........... .."...,.,.,.,.. t } current calendar year Certificate of Good Standirig t: Don't have a copy? obtaln this certificate from, PIN Secretary of State, Business Services Division Sec'fetsay CW Raw” a r r."„ < 4m:,,,„wler_° 60 Empire Drive, Suite 100 £ , St PM4 MN 5 103 6510960901 aw twil wee1077351-6767 ww w IRS income tax exemption(561(c))letter in your organization's name Don't have a copy? To obtain a copy of your federal lneerre tax exempt letter, have an organization after contort the H xxxxxxxx# IRS tall free at 1-877-82 9-5500, Affiliate of national,stativerlde,or international parent nonprofit organ zat€ n chart r if your organization falls under,a parent organization, attach copies of both of the fellovvin : 1. IRS letter ahrrwMg your parent organization is a nonprofit 501(c) rrrgiankatiea with a group ruling" and 7.: the charter or letter from your parent organization recognizing your organization as a sutrerdir:atc, x n..n v v v.v xxxxxv_ will b - � -Hf� : drawing ralli take acw) ... ....... .. ---______ ....... ........ ________ ...... ......... . Check one-, r: f ..:........ .._ ziph county: �r Township: it= Zip: County: ; .. , x.xs. .x%,1 <.„.- v,wuM :.. x...„' r:< x„, „ K¢�: t.. z` ............__ _________ o rrr u. .t.r. ......_ _ .................... t Check each type of gambling activity that your”organizatkin will conduct: d Naga a q � e �, 3 ra x"x:a 3'rr� r`� �: bingo }, Wards, r a: s a �.. z�, r UA he~•, i t d oYs v air- 'r 3 et 3 g r `'': P x” d # cardsrz ei ton r b.� ..'x,r,xr of�°xr '� ....... .t z n. oE bingo S H x E ......:. .....-..frarr=v 11 err <r„=> ..r.; ft:.�..,x..,...x::",.r "" x x....e-- r„ '� r 83 LG220 Application forExempt Permit I,i III V? ­2 2 to scare within city limits located in a townsh 1 1 11 p the application is -acknowledged Path no waiting period, heapplication is ac-'knowledged with no wenting period, 'tie acph ation is acknowledged with a 30-day waiting he application is ackr h nowdedge(i wit a 30 day yealtI period, and allows the Board to 'issue a peron't after 2g0 Cava period, and shows the Board to issue a permit after (60 days for a Ist class city), 30 flays, it I lige application i denied. he application is derded, D "I . ...... Pay re submitting applicaU n to .............­ UNTY ------------------------- gambling premotee p Print C - -Ey Print County Borne; . ........................ ...................... ............... Signatur a of City Personnel= Sionature of County flersorvreik ............................. ...................... .......................... ............................. ............................ . ........................... ................................. .............................. .................................... it ........................... ......................... ........................... ...Date°..... . .............. 'title:......................... .................................. Date TOWNSHIP (if required by the county) On behalf of the township, I ackilociledge that the organization is applying for eXernOted garart illng acildvil wirril i i t the township The city or county must sign before lirnift, (A township 65 no statutory authority to approve or submitting application to the deny an application, per pfinn, Statutes,section 3491213,1, Gambling Control Board. Print7ownship ftarnea ......... . ......... .............. ..................................... ...................... Signature of Township Officer. .... ................... 1"i d e s ........................... ....................................—, _Dice: ............................. ..............111.17............ ................................ ...............—­.......... CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER'S SIGNATURE (required) ................................... .................. ..................­.................. ............................. ...................­­..................... Th ............................................ e ir formabor Provided in this applicat m charade to the best of my knowfedge, acknowledge that the financial don is cor--plete and a report,will be conIpleraid and returned to the hoard stit-hin 30 days of the eventlate, 0 Chief Executive officer-Is Signature, otDate, of t­T.�� .;................... ............... ........... (S on, is lm; .a C R a a Pay net son"I I 5aC r--D ior PrName� Fr, r I v G e in ..... ...................... .................. .................................................................. ............................ ...................... ................................... ............................ ............................. ....................... ............... ..... AREQI ........... ............................ EQUIREMENTS M�il­APPLICATION AND ATTACHMENTS ............ ........................ ........................ CCa ............... ........................................ c P plate a separate application for, F�� 'i i Mail application witho • all gambling conducted on two or more r r P secutive days; or, req gambng ndsee d , ............. copy Of your proof Of nonprofit st tust a-rid • all licoucted on ay application fee i`ncP-refijncbdde�). if file application 'Bi Only one application --is required if,one or more raffle. drawings are ;)earmarked or received 30 days or more before the event, conducted on thesarne day, the application fee is $100; otherwise the fee is 5150, Financial report to be completed within 30 days after the Make check Payable to State of Minnesota. gambling activity is done-, To, Minneap Ir Garritfling Control Board A financial report form mill axe mailed with your permit,, Complete 17'1'.1 West County Road B, Suite 300 SOUffi and ratt=an the financial report forryi to me Gambling- Control Rosevll�le, MN 55113 Boand, or organa oo"mz� Questions? Yet a your organ,�_zatfoh mustlyeep ail exempt and reports for Call the Licensing Section of the Garnbling Control Board at Sr 3 L1/2years(ninn, tart.i.ites, section 349,166, si bel, 2(f)), 651-539-:1900, U ....................................... ............................... ............................ .............................. -red tr Fr I K, r .)orb owncy not.cw The imorroation rogues appficatorl, Your organizat,on's name and n lent of'.utille,Safety;Attomey :are rale on tho form and isly attachments)will beweld winners will be public information wher,received COrnmossorers of Administration,Minnesota by the Gambling Cannot Boars (Board)to by the Board, A"other information prowdediniN uta race* &Bndpwt,and RevenuL; legislativdetnrte on qnFlincathins to be private data abs I t your oroamoadon Untli the Aud:tor national or d international garobling be in,,,,,)' J o .ved in lawful gambling in Board issms,the pan iK, When the Board issues regulatory agenclair anyone pursuant to coort, 1 41 o miIineivirat Your orvoas inizatior hthe riah�to the perTilite all inforr latror provided will bacon older,, enter and agencies at arc l moles to supply the informe.1.0n; hossiver, public, If the Board goes not issue a Para It,all anthmand by state or federal law to have access your orgarlizaflon to supply this arms individuals arid agencies for hionroticip provided totheinf. .ition F the Board may list as able to exception 06 Your rare aI witkano name andwhich law or legal Order is.ithorow's a new use o mirr C ' detera tour organizationya poillfiratforis address which Will r Mairl PUNk, Private data shar d no of infoi matior after this n ou OR was as a rilay rouse no issue a Permit, about your organizanon are avalable tri,Board given, and a~yore your wmk-to,',consent, if torr organization supplies th a ru r members, d over staff whosetorp returas s requested,the fioard vdfl be able to process file access to the information;Phrineeol&s Dehart- riri< rearm oai11 ba needs acailahle r a err'rati?ca tui.eat:ilea iarna to art#bre ail*�_ udon roguastr A=r equal optivsevey. erysinypr 84 CITY OF CENTERVILLE REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION entervi(Ce E77 Agenda Item# Department: Requested Council Meeting Date: Parks/Administration 4/25/2018 TITLE OF ISSUE: Cornerstone Park Portable Restroom BACKGROUND AND SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION: This is a follow-up to previous discussions. The item was tabled at the last City Council meeting to gather more data. Below, is the up-to-date information: - The cost of the portable restroom will be $105/28 days (4 months = $420). Staff recommends June - Sept. -Bald Eagle Waterski Club will participate in 50% of the costs for the ADA restroom at Cornerstone Park. They will not immediately seek to have their own restroom near the lake. - Screening is not provided at other parks for our portable restrooms - Screening and small signage for this restroom could be built for $200, by summer Public Works workers -Parks and Rec Committee voted 5-1 to recommend having a portable ADA restroom at Cornerstone Park COST AND SOURCE(S) OF FUNDING: $210 (4 months of restroom); $200 (screening) - General Fund - Parks Maintenance REQUESTED COUNCIL ACTION: Motion to approve rental of ADA restroom, to be placed at Cornerstone Park, for 4 months. Motion to approve construction of screening/signage for restroom. For Clerk's Use: SUPPORTED DOCUMENTS ATTACHED Motion By: Resolution Ordinance Contract Minutes Plan Map Second By: Vote Record: A e Nay King Other(specify) Love Paar Koski Montain Administration Department Use: Refer to: Consent Tabled Until: Regular Other: 85 CITY OF CENTERVILLE REQUEST FOR, COUNCIL ACTION terviffe Department, Requested Council Nleeting Date: Administration April 25,2018 rdA Second Series 2018 Fee Schedule BACKGROUND AND SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION: Staff polled neighboring municipalities and found that our escrow requirements for zoning(Preliminary Plat, PUD, CUP/lUP, Rezoning, Site Plan Review& Comprehensive Plan Amendments)were extremely low. COST,VND SOURCE(S)OF FUNDING-. Potential ter publication Fees REQUESTED COUNCIL ACTION: Staff is recommending changes as noted and same will require additional readings. For Clerk's Use: SUPPORTED DOCUMENTS ATTACHED M[otion By: Resolution Ordinance Contract minutes Plan Map Second By: ................................................................................................................................... Vote Record: A King Other iepeci5r) LoveE................................................ Pear Koski Mont in Administration[)apartment Um ConsentTabled Until:........................................................................................................................................................... Regular 86 Plumbing Permits............ .........-...... .......... ...See Exhibit"C" Electrical Permit ....... .......SceExhibit"D" Demolition Permit&Escrow: Residential (not required for accessory bldgs. <120 sq, fl.).$200.00 (§150.01) Escrow........................................---...—....................$2,000.00 or Letter of Credit Commercial./Industrial.............„,44,Valuation Based w/Minimum. f,".................e„ae........ea .................. .............. $300.00 Escrow.................. ............... ............... ............20% of Demo. Cost Permit Surcharge.... ............. Per State of NIN Chapter 152 Sign Permit Fee: Wall-mounted sign............................ ........ .........$75.00 Free-standing sign(In addition to building permit)...............$75.00 (:ha ter 153 Park Dedication Fees Land Dedication....... ....... ............ (§15115) At option of City-1 0% of Fair market Value of all property located in the proposed development.or ,000,l snit(whichever is greater) Commercial/Industrial..","................ ........... ...$2,175.00/acre Lot Split/Lot Combination....... ................................... $200.00 plus legal fees+park fees Park fees only apply if the lot is split Preliminary Plat Fee—Application ....3500.00+deposit of$440-40,4het-or-lhmC (City Review will cease if costs exceed fee-s, and deposit is not replenished) .. ..... ... .. .. .. .. .. ............. . Chapter 156 Bridges/Structures in easement Enemachment Agreement........... ...... ..............$100.00 (§154.130 Annuall.'nsurance Monitoring& Inspection,<....................x....$25.00 Fence Permit.............-.................. .............-360.00 In Easement Requires Council Action and Encroach. gr. 100.00 Recording Fees PUD Application(§156.25 1) $500.00 Unit Variance Application (§l 56310),... ................ ........ ..........$250M+deposit of$500.00 (City Review will cease if costs exceed deposit and deposit is not replenished) Pace 4 of 17 87 Conditional or Interim Use Permit Application §156.3211)......$250.00-+ deposit of (City Reviewwill cease if costs exceed deposit and deposit is not replenished) Rezoning Requests §156.410)..................... .t.A...,a,keaa, 2%00+-deposit of$500,00 (City review will cease if costs exceed deposit and deposit is not replenished) Site Plan Review,,,,,, $250.1:10+deposit o1 . (City Review will cease ifcosts exceed deposit and deposit is not replenished) Comprehensive Plan d t- pplieant will pay all costs associated withamendment - 25p. it deposit of$504.4)0 (City Review iew will cease if costs exceed deposit and deposit is not repleni r 157 Fill Permit&Grading Permits.............. ....... ...dee Exhibit"E" Site Maintenance I ep sitt r si n Control/Landscape/Sod/Driveway Escrow ....n„......... ..............................a, _...e.......................oa$5,000 15T,5, 150,045 (154A10) (May substitute letter of edit Land DevelopmentMini ......atr4a.¢¢,mb,:§tib......aaa.tr..d_ 5,OKO (addressed inDeveloper's Agreement) OTHERg Assessment Certificate.....,....a...................................a..,.K.............$45. 00 Base Map Updating Fee (New blot).......................................$40.00,/Lot(Developer's agree.) (Minima f 50 Council Chamber Rental -Must be non-profit organization—No Charge Private Business ess ........,.I.......................................4aqn„.............................................$3 O/Hour, 2 Hour Miry, Security Deposit(City Policy-08/05)....................................$150-00 FilingFees................................... .............................................__$2.00 Maps and Charts(24” " .................__......a.............. ............$15.00 Non-Sufficient ds/ etu ed Check......... ................... ..........$50.00 Notary Fees....._......._.............................................................. 1.00/it em Phan Copies..... bbaa..e„se4g.....................p.........................................a ,25 per page (urge sided) Public Woks Labor& Equipment_._.........................__..... /hr, (2 hr. min+Equip. Cost) Research Charge.....................§..a.,t,¢.t......¢t¢,mbb.a.§r4<tsttrm.a.:dre,s,....... dil,d half hourminim-am .........m,,,,,, ,,,,,,,,n,.a..,...,w,,.,t,d.,a,a,b,a,,,,,M.„a> KKa.sa.a¢a.da,>,a.a.,.99.,t...aaa.a..$60.00 for each hour thereafter Street Vacation Request uest.................... .....................a„a.aa,aa.,$500.00(review d hearing costs) Page 5 of 17 88 CITY OF CENTERVILLE REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION entervi(fe Agenda Item# Department: Requested Council Meeting Date: Public Services TITLE OF ISSUE: Stop Sign Replacement BACKGROUND AND SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION: The city adopted a sign reflectivity program and in 2014 replace 1/2 of the stop signs in town. I propose to replace the other 1/2 now with a 15 year life expectancy. COST AND SOURCE(S) OF FUNDING: REQUESTED COUNCIL ACTION: To approve the Quote by Newman sign for 40 @ $31.5 lea, $1,260.40 plus shipping For Clerk's Use: SUPPORTED DOCUMENTS ATTACHED Motion By: Resolution Ordinance Contract Minutes Plan Map Second By: Vote Record: Ave Nay King Other(specify) Quote Love Paar R Koski Montain Administration Department Use: Refer to: Consent Tabled Until: Regular Other: 89 V. ■ QUOTATION Newman Signs Inc. PO Box 1728 **Prices on quote are guaranteed for 30 days** Jamestown,ND 58402 Phone:800-437-9770 Quote#:TRFQTE001553 Anticipated Ship Date:4/13/2018 Quote Date: 3/30/2018 Customer Number:CEN-03-008 Ship Via: UPS REGULAR Scheduled Ship Date:4/20/2018 Sales Rep:Christine Wahl FOB:DESTINATION Payment Terms: Net 30 Bill To: Ship To: CITY OF CENTERVILLE CITY OF CENTERVILLE 1880 MAIN ST 2085 CEDAR ST CENTERVILLE MN,55038 CENTERVILLE MN,55038 Header Note:***FREE SHIPPING— SEQ Item Number/Cast Code/Description/Nate Quantity Unit price Extended Price 1 T-R1-130/2A3A 40.00 31.51 1,260.40 30X30-.080-STD PUNCH/RAD SINGLE POST-HIP-W/R STOP Subtotal: 1,260.40 Tax: 0.00 Total: $1,260.40 3/30/2018 4:24:08 PM 90 s a vn 3423 ,... CENTERVILLE LIONS CLUB CENTERVILLE,MN 550,32TRY L s w o &,-sT ............ —________ J mn. ...........W... ------------------------- X a® m 0 ® c cr CA 0mr � ic zc 91 Administrator/Engineer's Report en terVill e April 25, 2018 +:.I�r7.7771 ADMINISTRATION Administrator Continuing Education Plan I recently attended a League of MN Cities Insurance Trust(LMCIT)Loss Control Workshop. Topics included fire protection class rating standards presented by the Insurance Service Organization (ISO), Human Resources/Hiring Policies, Liability Insurance issues and Information Technology security. I have registered for the Minnesota County/City Managers Association conference, May 2-4, 2018. Social Media Presence The City's Facebook page is live and we are beginning to promote it. We will continue to ramp up our efforts to add content and utilize its potential. 2018 City Council Goals Our goal setting meeting was held on February 28th. The City's goals have been outlined as: Succession Planning Economic Development Community Engagement Staff Meetings Our monthly staff meeting was held on April 12th. STORMWATER/WETLAND Local Water Plan The Council-approved plan has now been submitted to the Rice Creek Watershed District and Met Council, ahead of the deadline of June, 2018. Storm Water Capital Improvement Plan and Rate Study Upon submittal of the Local Water Plan, we will utilize some of the information from that plan to formulate a rate study. The study will also need to pull information from the City's Comprehensive Plan. 92 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT/PLANNING United Properties' 21st Ave. Distribution Center Developer's Agreement Fulfilment A Letter of Credit(LOC) has now been received, from United Properties for the overlay of Fairview Avenue. This means that United Properties has now fulfilled all of its obligations under the developer's agreement for 21st Avenue. Peltier Estates We have been in contact with the developer and have been working through final issues on the developer's agreement. They have submitted their final plat to Anoka County and have now received comments. A right turn lane will be required. Ruffridge Johnson Council agreed to pay for private utilities to be run along Commerce Drive, to the site. The final cost of this is being worked out. The closing date for the sale of the property is set for April 30 at 1:30 p.m. Waterworks Site/DeFoe Property A concept sketch for a residential development was presented to the Planning and Zoning Commission at their March 6th meeting. A pre-application, staff meeting, with the developer was held on April 5th. We anticipate an application for Preliminary Plat in the near future. A potential project schedule was presented at the meeting, which showed a possible construction start date of mid-July. General Development Activity We have received several calls and have provided information or guidance to a number of prospective developers regarding multiple vacant or redevelopment sites in town. Economic Development Authority This month's City Council workshop will focus on setting parameters for the EDA, including brainstorming some initial issues for them to address. SEWER AND WATER Lift Station 2 Rehabilitation The project was completed the week of April 9th. Work went smoothly and an inspection of the interior of the lift station did not turn up any major concerns with the structure itself. Trailside Park Shoreline Restoration A preconstruction conference was held. Work will begin as soon as road restrictions have been lifted, in early May. 93 PUBLIC WORKS/STREETS Lino Lakes LaMotte Neighborhood Street and Utility Reconstruction A street project is now approved, but water main will not be included, except that Lino Lakes would like to run a main down to their neighborhood park to provide the area with some measure of fire protection. Labor Union Negotiations A formal contract has been sent to the Union for their final review and signature. Copier We are looking at options to replace the Public Works Department copier and will bring those to Council in the near future. PARKS Dupre Artifacts Cataloging of the artifacts is now complete. We will need to begin looking at a strategy for display of the items. I have been in contact with the Wargo Nature Center and they are excited about getting some of the items for display in their building. Conversations with the Elementary School are ongoing. We are also exploring opportunities to, again, display items during Fete des Lacs. Parks Capital Improvement Plan and Park Dedication Fee Study I attended the January Park and Rec Meeting to discuss the structure of Park Dedication Fees and the need for a comprehensive study to properly justify those fees. We will bring a proposal forward, for Council's review, to complete a formal Park and Trails Plan. FETE DES LACS The Fete des Lacs Committee has been meeting, the third Monday of each month and planning is well underway. The festival is set for July 17-22, 2018. The parade theme this year will be"Cougar Pride". Facebook(@fetedeslacs) and web pages (www.fetedeslacs.or ) are now up and running. PUBLIC SAFETY Centennial Fire District • Painting and remodeling efforts are underway at both stations. • The flooring will be done at station 3 first and is planned for May 2. Centennial Lakes Police Department • Sgt. Bill Jacobson has been attending Fete des Lacs Committee meetings and has done a great job coordinating public safety night during the festival. 94 M DftcPART MENT 0 F H!E A It IM Prore cling, Maintaining and Improving the Health of All Minnesotans April 18, 2016 Centerville City Council leo City Clark Centerville City Hall 1880 Main Street Centerville, Minnesota 55038 Dear CouncilMembers-. SUBJECT- Sanitary Survey Report for Centerville Public Water System (PWS), Anoka County, PWSID 1020036 Enclosed is a copy of the sanitary survey report summarizing an on-ske inspection of your Community Public Water System. This report includes a review of the system's water source, facilities, equipment, operation, maintenance, and monitoring compliance for the purpose of evaluating the adequacy of the facilities for producing and distributing safe drinking water, "Technical and management information regarding the operation of the system may also be provided. Conducting sanitary surveys on a regular basis is an important element in preventing contamination of drinking water supplies and in maintaining compliance with the National Primary Drinking Water Standards, Paul Palzer and Todd Peterson were present during this inspection, Please take appropriate action to address any deficiencies or recommendations identified within this report, A deficiency may lead to a contamination of the water supply or failure of the system to be in compliance with the Safe Drinking Water Act. The enclosed report must be kept on file and made available for public review for not less than tan (10) years, The Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) continues to monitor your PWS for contaminants identified by state and federal drinking water regulations. The results of such monitoring are not part of this report, They are sent to you under separate cover as they become available. If you have questions concerning the information contained in the report, please contact me at 651/201-4683, Sincerely, Brian A, Noma, P 4E Public Health Engineer Section of Drinking Water Protection P,O. Box 64975 St. Paul, Minnesota 55164-0975 BAN Enclosures cc" Water Superintendent An equal opportunity employer. 95 System Name, Centerville f H 1020036 Works ctor f rrf r Sr r rr r As a reminder, it is required that a well for a communitypublic wafer supply be located according to distances specified in Minn,Rules 4725,4450, including not less than 50 feet from a source of contamination including br re sewers (except an specified in Minn. Rales 4725.5850). No deficiencies observed, No deficiencies observed. wafor.xSj fgge' No deficiencies obser ed. Distribution It is recommended that dead sada in the str butt r system be minimized by looping, If leaping is not feasible, a fire hydrant, approved flushing g hyd rant or blow off for flushing pr r rrnn must be used of the dead cads to maintain wafer quality and/or churn residual. [Recommended Standards for Water Works a IN C)n 411 tods:th Data "elifinoatloc The following applicable records s are required to be maintained by the wafer supply aynfnrnF a. Coliform bacteria results - 5 yearn Chlorine residual results - 5 years n, Chemical read. - 10 years w Sanitary survey reports - 10 yearn Y All lead and nrrfier materials - 12 yearn f. Consumer confidence reports - 3 years g. Public Notices - fi years h. Fluoride quarterly results and monthly reports 1 year As a reminder, engineering plans for new, modifications to, or additions to the water supply y system, including wat rmn ra, are required to be properly submitted to the Minnesota Department f Health for review, All plane meet be approved prior to the start of construction, [Minn, galea 2atfif 96 1 of 3 MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH Section of Drinking Water Protection Sanitary Survey Report ...................... ------------------.....................................................................—--------------- Survey Date, 0311912018 System Name,Centerville PWS ISurveyor:B Ann A. Noma. P.E.D' 1020036 System Contact, Paul Pincer- Public Works Director PWS Typen Community .....................----.......................----------------------- ................................ ......................................... M_w --------- ............................ I------------------------ 8oqy!!q!npLnW no Reco Ana F..... rnmendabdris, ....................I I............ ------------- ................................. -------- ----..................................... Witer rstern Man i To ensure security, it is recommended that a daily check of critical system components be conducted, including confirmation that all doors and access hatches are locked. It is strongly recommended that materials which are not essential to water works operation not be stored in the water facility. There were a lot of boxes of records and other materials (signs, tables, boxes) that were not directly related to the operation of the water system that were being stored in well house #1. The stored material makes it extremely difficult for the operator or any other officials to obtain water samples from well no. 1 without damaging the stored materials. ratr Liar its it nts The certified operators are required to qualify themselves by attending waterworks operators training seminars offered throughout the state. Continuing education is valuable experience for anyone engaged in this field. The required contact hours in the previous 3 years for certification renewal are- Class A 32 contact hours Class,B 24 contact hours Class C 16 contact hours Class D 8 contact hours Class E 4 contact hours [Minn. Rules 9400,12001 97 Page 2 of 3 .. .. ............... .......... .......... "sta Mmw awli, .......................................................... .............. .............................................. .... ......................................... System Name-, Centerville Survey Date- 03119/2018 PWSID, 1020036 Surveyor Brian A. Noma, RE. Director ........................................ .......... .............. ............... ................................................................................ ...................................................................................... ................................................................................... . . .........__................... .................... . ....... .. .. ...... ....................... .......... .............................................................................................................. Chlorine Resid, a, Colfform U FreeI I otal Bacteria ------------ --- .......... ..................... 03/19/2018 Public Works / sent 03119/2018 Centerville Elementary / 0,03 Absent 03/19/2018 Florist / 0,33 Absent 98 ............. SECTION OF DRINKING WATER PROTECTION Public Water Supply Inventory Report xxxxxxxx ......................................... ............... ............... System Name: Centerville Survey Date, 0311912018 Brian A. Noma, RE. PVVSlD' 1020036 Surveyor. ctor ................................................................................................. .......................................................................................... ................................................................................................................ ......................................................................................................... ............... ............... .......... ................................................................ ............... ............... ............... . r"31 H N...M Adc, -,s ............. ............................. -------------'wTM ( I AInt act Paul Palzer-Public Business Phone 1 651/429-4750 Works Director Cell Phone 6511261-5733 Email ppalzer@centeryill emmcom Business Phone 1 6511429-4750 Cell Phone 6511324-2382 Email tpeterson@centeryill emn,c am 'Teresa Benr, C.'Aty%Wmark Business Phone 1 6511429-3232, Ext. 13 Email tbender@centervillemn.com Owner/Responsible Party Centerville City Council cm,City Clerk Business Phone 1 6511429-3232, Exr, 13 Centerville City Hall Email tbender@centervillemn.com 1880 Main Street Centerville, MN 55038 Financial Centerville City Council clo City Clerk Centerville City Hall 1880 Main Street Centerville, MN 55038 Sample Baftsnu,'General CoFrespOod"Go0c Centerville Water City Hall Email ppalazer@centeryfile. com Superintendent 1880 Main Street Centerville, MN 55038 Emergency Workday Paul Plazer Cell Phone 6511261-5733 Email ppaizer@centervillemn.com rrn .a -,A1f1,a114r­ry j -Y rare --cc, Anoka Dispatch Business Phone 1 763/427-1212 Consumer Confidence Report Paul Palzer Business Phone 1 6511429-4750 . . ............................................................ ..................... ............... Owner Type: Municipal Population- 4275 system ('1ass' Sevica Connections: 1265 Sergi it a Area Chlaractemsfics-1 Municipal luau -olms' n7 4/1812018 99 Page I of HIMtT MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SECTION OF DRINKINGTPROTECTION D P TSE 1�F HE�ttN Public Water Supply Inventory Report M System Nerve: Centerville Survey Date: 0311912018 W 1 : 1020036 Surveyor: Brian A. Noma, P.E. System Contact Paul Palter- Public Works Director PWS Type: Community Go pr Name Class Name Amis 99it Burmeister, Gr g A, D 94/90/2920 Balser, Paul D 06130/2018 Peterson, Tedd E. D 1213112915 Schmitz, Daniel P, D 04130/2020 .. .......n ._....... .......vv ......... ..v v...... .--w..w..w..w.._.w..w.._.w..w..w..w.._.,� i action Totals uw ... ......... ......... ......... ......... �n...wr Design Capacity: 2,564:909 Gallons per Day Emergency Capacity: 1$554,090 Gallons per Day Average Daily. 255,413 Gallons Storage Capacity, 500,900 Gallons Highest Daily: 573;000 Gallons ......., ......n e nfah. --------- --x---------------- ................................................................................................................................................... .....v....................................................................:.................................................. Well Unique Well No., 00512748 Source Type: Groundwater Type: Well Pump Capacity(gpm): 1100 Status: Active Pumping Rate{ prm: 1100 Availability: Primary Emergency Capacity: 1100 Callons parMinute Year Constructed: 1993 Static Depth (ft): Well Depth (it), 157 Dra do {ftp: 5 Casing Depth (ft): 101 Pump Type: Submersible Casing Diameter(in): 14 Vulnerable, Yes Scram: Length (ft): 12 Aquifer: prairie Du Chian Group well Unique Well No.: 00511091 Source Type: Groundwater Type- Well Pump Capacity(gprri): 750 Status: Active Pumping Rate(9pm): 750 Availability: Emergency Emergency Capacity- Year Constructed: 1955 Static Depth (ft): 12 Well Depth (ft): 257 Drawdown (ftp: 48 Casing Depth {ft}: 200 Pump Type- Submersible Casing Diameter{in}: 12 Vulnerable- No Screen Length (ft): Aquifer" Jordan Interconnect-Lire Lakes Type: Consecutive Connection Source Type: Purchased Groundwater Status: Active Design Capacity: Availability: Emergency Emergency Capacity: Pump- Purchases ump:Pu hases From, 1029623 Linn Lakes 4/152018 100 Page 2 of 4 xxxxxxx x � xx xx:x t MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT F HEALTH AN . AMI SECTION Off} DRINKING WATER PROTECTION m � s Public Water Supply Inventory RepotOIL F� WOF M ,A1 03/1912018 Survey Date. Surveyor, Brian Point Source Water, Groundwater cit a Design Capacity,. 1,100 Gallons per Minute Availability: Primary Emergency Capacity: 1,100 Gallons per Minute Treatmentha it , Treatment Process Mechanism Disinfection Chlorine/Sodium hypochlonts Fluoride la rl a lea Ho la ailiala acid Iron/Manganese Sequestration Stabil: ilii ,llyhaaiaaa yY211#41 EntgLPFAnt Type, Treatment dant Source sea Ur0unryeaer oru�aa a 1ve Design Capacity: 750 Gallons per Minute Availability: Emergency Emergency Capacity: raxf ix . ielaeailaa %A l . r Fluoride Fla rldation/Hydr filaaailiala acid Type. Storage-Elevated Capacity. 500,000 Gallons, Status:Active Availability'. ri ary Chlorination- 101 l rination-101 411812018 a s a o INNE3T� MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SECTION OF DRINKING I �r ��ETH Public Water SupplyIt 'ty %18T .......... ._ ._.. ....... ....... .......... .. _.. ......................................................... System Name- Cents Survey Date- 0311912018 WSi � 1020036 Surveyor: Brian A. Noma, P.E. System Contacta Paul Palter- Public Works Director PWS TypeCommunity -- - -- i `r real � its Ian Distribution Sample Site l D Sample Location t o Notes 001 Noble Welding Active 002 Centerville Elementary Active 003 Barole Trucking tiv 004 Centerville Florist Active 005 Latta Park Bldg Active 006 Centerville Public Wake Active 007 ADL Automotive Active 008 Mortensen Construction Active 4/1812018 102 Page 4 of 4