Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2018-06-13 CC Packet CITY OF CENTERVILLE COUNCIL MEETING enterviCe Wednesday, June 13, 2018 6:30 p.m. COUNCIL MEETING L CALL TO ORDER 1. Roll Call II. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE III. APPROVAL OF AGENDA IV. APPOINTMENTS/PRESENTATIONS 1. Recognition of Service—Ms. Ellen Paulseth (Res. #18-007) (Page 1) 2. Life Saving Award Presentation (Centennial Fire)—Ms. Kari Letourneau V. PUBLIC HEARING 1. None VL APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. December 13, 2017 City Council Closed Executive Session Meeting Minutes (Page 2) 2. January 14, 2018 City Council Closed Executive Session Meeting Minutes (Page 3) 3. February 14, 2018 City Council Closed Executive Session Meeting Minutes (Page 4) 4. May 23, 2018 City Council Meeting Minutes (Pages 5-10) VII. CONSENT AGENDA 1. City of Centerville May 23, 2018 through June 13, 2018 Claims (Check#31856- 31893)W/Voided Check#31857 (Pages 11-12) 2. Centennial Lakes Police Claims through June 8, 2018 (Check#12013-12055) W/Voided (Check#12004-12010) & Payroll (Check#12011-12012 & 12021)WEFT US Bank& Optum W/Voided EFT (Transactions #201808-201824) (Pages 13-16) 3. Trailside Park Final Pay Request (Pages 17-18) 4. Res. #18-008 - Interfund Loan Repayment- $100K Loan from Sewer Fund to Street Fund (Pages 19-20) 5. Alexandra House Request for Sponsorship, 2019 (Pages 21-23) 6. Centennial Youth Hockey Association—Wiseguys Pizza & Pub Premises Permit Application (Pages 24-26 7. Request for Encroachment Agreement, 7130 Mill Road—Fence (Pages 27-30) VIII. OLD BUSINESS 1. Approve Draft Comprehensive Plan for Distribution to Surrounding Jurisdictions (Pages 31-139) 2. Waste and Recycling Hauler Billing Responsibilities (Page 140) 3. One Month Extension to Waste and Recycling Hauler Contract with Waste Management (Pages 141-142) IX. NEW BUSINESS 1. Review of Audit (Pages 143-167) 2. Proposal for Budget Preparation Assistance (Abdo, Eick& Meyers) (Pages 168-185) 3. Fete des Lacs Budget (Page 186) X. COUNCIL/ADMINISTRATOR ANNOUNCEMENTS 1. Administrator/Engineer Report (Pages 187-193) XL ADJOURNMENT *INFORMATIONAL MATERIAL** Rice Creek Watershed District(RCWD)Notice of Public Hearing for Stormwater Pollution Prevention Program (SWPPP) *REMINDERS** Citywide Clean-up Day— Saturday, June 16, 2018 — 8 a.m—Noon, Laurie LaMotte Parking Lot P&Z Committee—Tuesday, July 10, 2018 —6:30 p.m. City Hall (Note date change from regular schedule to avoid holiday) P&R Committee—Wednesday, July 11, 2018 — 6:30 p.m. City Hall (Note date change from regular schedule to avoid holiday) City Council Workshop - Canceled for June City Council Meeting—Wednesday, June 27, 2018 —6:30 p.m. City Hall Recycling Saturdays: 9:00 a.m. — 12:00 p.m. (Green Lights Recycling, 1525 — 99th Lane N.E., Blaine) July 14, August 11, September 8, October 13, November 10 & December 8, 2018 STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF ANOKA CITY OF CENTERVILLE RESOLUTION #18-007 A RESOLUTION PROCLAMATION FOR FINANCE DIRECTOR MS. ELLEN PAULSETH FOR HER DEDICATED YEARS OF SERVICE TO THE COMMUNITY OF CENTERVILLE WHEREAS, Ms. Paulseth was hired by the City of Centerville in April of 2002 and served as the City's first Finance Director for slightly over two (2) years. She brought to the City 21 years of experience as she had been employed with the Lake of the Woods County; and WHEREAS, Ms. Paulseth had held several positions since 2004, being employed at Washington County, City of Forest Lake and City of Maplewood all in finance; and WHEREAS, Ms. Paulseth accepted an alternative position with another community for several years in the capacity of Finance Director; and WHEREAS, Ms. Paulseth was contracted on a part-time basis to provide the City of Centerville with her services of Finance Director in October of 2013 to present; and WHEREAS, While being a Mom and holding the above stated positions, Ms. Paulseth obtained her Master's Degree in Public Administration from Metropolitan State University in 2016; and WHEREAS, Ms. Paulseth, while employed with the City of Centerville, has displayed a high degree of integrity over her storied career in the industry. Her experience working for cities and counties in the accounting industry has given her a skill set which will not likely be matched by any one person. With her diligent oversight, the City has gained and retained financial stability along with obtained a AA bond rating; and WHEREAS, Ms. Paulseth has not only served the City through her employment, she is also a resident of the community and has consistently found ways to give back; and NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CENTERVILLE, MINNESOTA AND KNOWN TO ALL: That the City of Centerville has been honored and enriched with your services over the years. We wish you and your family nothing but the best and hope you take time to enjoy those things you find special. We are all honored to have worked with you and value the lessons we have learned from you. Good luck with your future aspirations! PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City of Centerville this 13th day of June, 2018. Mayor, Jeff Paar Attest: City Clerk, Teresa Bender 1 CITY OF CENTERVILLE CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES IN CLOSED SESSION MINNESOTA STATUTE CHAPTER 13D.05 The City Council of Centerville, Minnesota met in a closed session on Wednesday, December 13, 2017, at 9:09 p.m., in City Hall. Present were Acting Mayor D. Love, Council members Steve King, Russ Koski and Matt Montain. Also present were City Attorney Kurt Glaser and Administrator Mark Statz. The purpose of the closed meeting was to discuss the pending negotiations regarding the Union contract. Union Contract Negotiations Statz presented the status of his negotiation with the Union follow some negotiation by Dallas Larson when he still served as Administrator. The Union presented their concepts for changes to the new labor contract. Larson proposed a ceiling for wage increases and annual carry-over of paid leave. A major issue was whether the Union membership would move their medical insurance to a Union-based plan. If the Union members left the City's medical insurance plan it could result in catastrophic premium increase for the non-Union staff. The strategy discussed was to create two different wage concepts that were depended upon whether the Union members stayed in the City's medical insurance plan. Consensus was reached that the proposed wage ceiling should be annual successive increases of 2.75%, 2.5%, 2.5%. However, if the Union members left the City's medical insurance plan the proposed wage ceiling should be 2.5%, 2.0%, 2.0%. Motion of Acting Mayor Love, Seconded by Montain, authorizing Statz to continue negotiations with permission to offer as much as annual successive increases of 2.5%, 2.75% and 2.75%, or alternatively 2.5%, 2.0%, 2.0%. if the Union members left the City's medical insurance plan; passed Unanimously. The meeting was reopened to the public at 9:31 p.m. by act of the Acting Mayor. Kurt Glaser, City Administrator Instructions: These minutes become public data after the ratification of the Union contract. 2 CITY OF CENTERVILLE' CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES IN CLOSED SESSION MINNESOTA STATUTE CHAPTER 13D.05 The City Council of Centerville, Minnesota met in a closed session on Wednesday, January 14, 2018, at 8:40 p.m., in City Hall. Present were Mayor Jeff Paar, Council members Steve King, D. Love, Russ Koski and Matt Montain. Also present were City Attorney Kurt Glaser and Administrator Mark Statz. The purpose of the closed meeting was to discuss the pending negotiations regarding the Union contract. Union Contract Negotiations Statz presented the status of his negotiation with the Union. His purpose was to gather consensus and permission from the Council to continue his negotiations with the Union. Statz discussed various points of proposed changes to the contract. For example, he proposed changing the clothing allowance to a fixed sum in order to save the cost of processing each receipt and also reduce negative morale issues that can sometime accompany these clothing purchase. The primary focus of discussion was the proposed wage increase over the next three years. Consensus settled on annual, successive increases of 2.5%, 2.75% and 2.75%. Motion of Council member Love, Seconded by Montain authorizing Statz to continue negotiations with permission to offer as much as annual successive increases of 2.5%, 2.75% and 2.75%; passed Unanimously. The meeting was reopened to the public at 9:13 p.m. by act of the Mayor. Kurt Glaser, City Administrator Instructions: These minutes become public data after the ratification of the Union contract. 3 CITY OF CENTERVILLE' CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES IN CLOSED SESSION MINNESOTA STATUTE CHAPTER 13D.05 The City Council of Centerville, Minnesota met in a closed session on Wednesday, February 14, 2018, at 8:50 p.m., in City Hall. Present were Mayor Jeff Paar, Council members Steve King, Russ Koski and Matt Montain. Council member D. Love was absent. Also present were City Attorney Kurt Glaser and Administrator Mark Statz. The purpose of the closed meeting was to discuss the terms of sale for City owned land to Ruffridge-Johnson, Inc., and to discuss the pending negotiations regarding the Union contract. Land Sale Statz reported the discovery that not all utilities reach to parcel pending sale to Ruffridge- Johnson. The debate ensued as to whether the City should pay this cost or if there should be some cost-share with the Buyer. Consensus was reached that given how the City offered that property for sale as "shovel ready," everyone, including the staff and council members, believed utilities reached that parcel. Investigation showed that providing gas, electric and communication lines to the parcel could cost as much as $25,000. Motion of the Mayor, Seconded by Koski, authorizing City staff to pay for utility service to the property in an amount not to exceed $25,000; passed Unanimously. Union Contract Negotiations Statz presented a memo outlining recommended changes to the contract as a resulted of negotiations with the Union. As of this meeting, those changes have not been transposed into a formal contract. Statz asked that if Council adopted these recommended changes that the next payroll cycle reflect these changes for Union members. Motion of the Mayor, Seconded by Koski to adopt the principal contract as set forth in the written memo presented by Statz, and authorize staff to pay union members at those rates in the next pay period on the condition the memo is ratified by the Union; passed Unanimously. The meeting was reopened to the public at 9:06 p.m. by act of the Mayor. Kurt Glaser, City Administrator Instructions: Both pieces of these minutes become public data after the closing of the sale to Ruffridge-Johnson, and the ratification of the Union contract. 4 CITY OF CENTERVILLE CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES May 23, 2018 6:30 p.m. Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, the City of Centerville held their regularly scheduled City Council meeting of May 23, 2018 at City Hall, 1880 Main Street. PRESENT: Mayor Jeff Paar Council Member Steve King Council Member Russ Koski Council Member D. Love Council Member Matt Montain 1 t �A P P j (� ABSENT: None STAFF: City Attorney Kurt Glaser City Administrator/Engineer Mark Statz L CALL TO ORDER Mayor Paar called to order 6:32 p.m. II. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE III. APPROVAL OF AGENDA Mayor Paar noted the following amendments to the Agenda: Approval of Minutes should state May 9 instead of April 25, 2018; add Check #31849-31855 Consent Agenda Item #1; remove #8197-9210) W/Checks #8193-8196 Payroll & W/Checks #8190-8192 Voided Consent Agenda Item #2 and add 11974-12003 and add W/Check #8193-8196 Payroll & W/Checks #8190-8192 Voided Consent Agenda Item #3. Motion by Council Member Love, Seconded by Council Member Montain to Approve the Agenda as noted. All in favor. Motion carried. IV. APPOINTMENTS/PRESENTATIONS 1. Proclamation for Retiring Lead Project Coordinator for his Dedicated Years of Service to the Community of Centerville—Mr. Greg Burmeister Administrator Statz stated that Mr. Burmeister recently submitted his retirement notice to the City effective June 8, 2018. Administrator Statz stated that the City is losing an incredible asset who has 40+ years of experience in the construction industry and will be leaving behind a legacy of an outstanding career and ability to listen to those he served. Administrator Statz also stated 5 City of Centerville Council Meeting Minutes May 23,2018 that Mr. Burmeister has a talent for problem solving and is highly praised by his peers. He stated that Mr. Burmeister was hired with the intent of saving the City money by providing internal oversight of projects rather than a consulting engineering firm. At first, this was very much doubted by the consulting firm of Stantec of which Administrator Statz was formally employed as an engineer at the time. Administrator Statz stated that over time, he became accustom to work along-side Mr. Burmeister, having respect for him and acknowledged that the City did save money during his tenor. He thanked Mr. Burmeister for being a part of Centerville and providing an opportunity to work with him. Mayor Paar provided Council Members an opportunity to speak to Mr. Burmeister. Council Member Love thanked him for everything that Mr. Burmeister has done during his employment with the City and stated that his passion for the City and its residents impressed him very much. He stated that an individual with that type of work ethic will be very hard to replace and that he valued that quality in Mr. Burmeister. Council Member King expressed his gratitude for the service of Mr. Burmeister and desired for him to enjoy every day of his retirement as it is well- deserved. Council Member Koski thanked Mr. Burmeister for his experience, ease of speaking with and a job well done. Council Member Montain thanked Mr. Burmeister for his services and wished him well in retirement. Mayor Paar stated that the City desired to recognize Mr. Burmeister by presenting him with a Resolution of recognition. Mayor Paar read Res. #18-006 and presented it to Mr. Burmeister. He thanked him for his service, dedication, hard work and stated that he was a financial asset to the taxpayers. Mr. Burmeister stated that he appreciated the recognition but the City will find someone to replace him, that he will miss staff and the residents very much but he is just a telephone call away if needed. Motion by Council Member Love, seconded by Council Member Montain to Adopt Res. #18-006 — Proclamation for Retiring Lead Proiect Coordinator for his Dedicated Years of Service to the Community of Centerville - Mr. Greg Burmeister as presented. All in favor. Motion carried. V. PUBLIC HEARING 1. None. VI. APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES 1. May 9, 2018 City Council Meeting Minutes Mayor Paar provided Council Members with an opportunity for modifications to the submitted minutes. Council Member Montain requested that clarification be made on Page 8 regarding the necessity of the fire department treasurer being a member of the department. He stated that that is not the case and desired for the correction to be made. Page 2 of 6 6 City of Centerville Council Meeting Minutes May 23,2018 Motion by Council Member Montain, seconded by Council Member Koski to Approve the May 9, 2018 with the Above Stated Amendment. All in favor. Motion carried. VII. CONSENT AGENDA 1. City of Centerville May 10,2018 through May 23, 2018 Claims (Check#31830- 31848) (Out of Sequence Checks Being Utilized) & (Check#31858-31870) 2. Centennial Lakes Police Claims through May 18, 2018 (Check#11974-12003) 3. Centennial Fire District Claims through May 18, 2018 (Check#8197-8210) W/Checks #8193-9196 Payroll & w/Checks #8190-8192 Voided 4. Labor Agreement—International Union of Operating Engineers—Local No. 49 5. Deny Request for Membership in MN Association of Small Cities 6. Employment Offer to Mr. James Huisenga for Public Services Technician (Grade 6, Step 1) 7. Encroachment Agreement 1779 Partridge Place—Pool & Fence 8. Encroachment Agreement 1789 Partridge Place - Fence Mayor Paar provided Council with an opportunity to discuss any item(s). Council Member King requested that Consent Agenda Item #5 be pulled for discussion. Motion by Council Member Love, seconded by Council Member Montain to Approve the Consent Agenda Items 1-4 & 6-8 as presented and welcomed Mr. Huisenga to the City of Centerville. All in favor. Motion carried. Council Member King questioned the organization's purposes. Administrator Statz stated that they are similar to the League of MN Cities and Metro Cities with a focus on municipalities of more rural nature and populations under 5,000. He also stated that they provide legislative lobbying services for these types of communities. Administrator Statz stated that communities such as Columbus, Stacy and Harris are members. Discussion ensued regarding whether a motion needed to be made to deny the request for membership and Legal Counsel Glaser stated no action needed to be taken. VIII. OLD BUSINESS 1. Waste and Recycling Hauler Request for Proposals Administrator Statz gave a brief review of the processes completed to date stating that proposals were received from four (4) haulers. Two (2) haulers were chosen for further negotiation from those. Council approved negotiations with these bidders and subsequent to receipt of final bids you are receiving these proposals for consideration. He stated that both vendors are competent, have submitted their refined proposals and have been invited this evening to give a 2-3 minute presentation as to why their firm should be granted the opportunity to provide services to the residents of Centerville. Administrator Statz stated that both vendors have been instructed to Page 3 of 6 7 City of Centerville Council Meeting Minutes May 23,2018 refrain from attempting to modify their submitted pricing as that portion of the process has been completed. Council requested that Administrator Statz give a recommendation for a hauler to secure. Administrator Statz stated that due to pricing he would recommend Republic Services as their submitted proposal would save residents approximately $44,000 over the period of the five (5) year contract. Administrator Statz stated that their pricing for a 30 gallon container was higher than Waste Management's which may be difficult for those residents that recycle, are on a fixed income or have a smaller family. However, over the period of the contract residents would be saving approximately $44,000 for services offered by Republic Services. Council Member King desired to clarify whether proposals were for the exact same services offered to the City currently and Administrator Statz concurred. Mr. Jason Hartman, Waste Management, stated that they have been the City's hauler for 15 years, many of the drivers employed with the firm have been the same since the beginning of the contract, they take pride in the services offered and appreciate the opportunity that has been provided to them for the contracted period. Ms. Beverly Mathiasen, Municipal Services Manager Republic Services, thanked the City for the opportunity to submit a proposal, she stated that they currently service Shoreview and Arden Hills along with 20 other cities and seven (7) counties. She stated that they take pride in the services they provide, are environmentally responsible, are a waste partner rather than a waste hauler/provider, have a facility in Blaine where they have held a safety title higher than the entire nation. Mr. Brian Schuller, General Manager Republic Services, stated that they are eager to become a part of the Centerville community and spoke highly of their safety record by stating that they are 46% safer than the national average. Lengthy discussion ensued regarding rates, services received in the past and relationships built with the current hauler. Opportunities for both haulers to submit proposals in five (5) years, necessity of negotiating contract language with either hauler and the necessity of the City's hauler to not only meet expectations but exceed expectations. Discussion ensued regarding commencing a contract with the ability to address an additional extension if need be and continued Friday pickups. Motion by Council Member Love, Seconded by Council Member Montain to Authorize Staff to Negotiate and Execute a Contract with Republic Services. Brief discussion was had regarding authorization for Staff to negotiate and execute a contract with Republic Services. A friendly amendment was added. All in favor. Motion carried. 2. Ordinance #91, Second Series — Departments, Boards, Commissions & Committees (Amending Ordinance #31) (Second Reading) Page 4 of 6 8 City of Centerville Council Meeting Minutes May 23,2018 City Administrator Statz explained that this is the second reading of the proposed ordinance amendment with the readings taking place similarly in the future. Motion by Council Member Montain, seconded by Council Member Koski to Adopt Ordinance#91, Second Series as presented. All in favor. Motion carried. IX. NEW BUSINESS 1. Review of Comp. Plan Water Resources Chapters Administrator Statz stated that the Comprehensive Plan contains elements other than planning. He stated that staff has completed these chapters and WSB will format them to be contained in the Plan. Administrator Statz stated that staff followed check lists of items that needed to be contained in the chapters from Met Council and stated that the City's infrastructure is in good shape and fairly new. He stated that staff felt that there were no major problems in the foreseeable future along with no capacity issues. There was brief discussion of work papers that were inadvertently contained in the packet and additional discussion ensued regarding private wells, well head protection area, future subdivisions and the scheduled public hearing at the Planning and Zoning Commission of June 5, 2018. Administrator Statz stated that no formal action was needed at this time. 2. Change Order— Trailside Park Shoreline Restoration Project Administrator Statz stated that he and Mr. Burmeister attended a recent RCWD Board meeting where the board chose the least expensive option for the City knowing that the City was attempting to be proactive in protecting the integrity of the City's sanitary sewer line and water quality of Centerville Lake. He stated that Anoka County Conservation underestimated the amount of rip-rap that would be needed along with rock. He stated that a change order of$8,370 was needed including these items. Discussion ensued regarding whether the City was paying the full portion of the costs upfront and then being reimbursed by RCWD, Anoka County Conservation and the successful grant obtained. Administrator Statz stated that funding will be from the Sewer Enterprise Fund as the work was completed to protect the sewer line. Administrator Statz added clarification and stated that the entire change order was for $24,240 with the City of Centerville's portion being $8,370 subsequent to RCWD reimbursing the City. Discussion ensued regarding the entire cost of the project being approximately $70,000. However, the City would be reimbursed for slightly less than $45,000. Motion by Council Member Koski, seconded by Council Member Love to Approve the Submitted Change Order ($24,240 w/City Portion $8,370) as presented. All in favor. Motion carried. X. COUNCIL/ADMINISTRATOR ANNOUNCEMENTS Page 5 of 6 9 City of Centerville Council Meeting Minutes May 23,2018 Administrator Statz stated that the packet contained his Administrator/Engineer's Report and he would be happy to answer any questions Council may have. Council Member King reported that North Metro TV's annual audit was completed with no issues of concern. Council Member Love attended a recent Police Steering meeting were Life-Saving awards were presented to citizens and officers. He stated that Office Jon Krueger was recognized for 20 years of service on the Centennial Lakes Police Department and being the longest standing officer on the department. He reported that the Centennial Lake Police Department's audit was completed with no issues of concern and Administrator Statz has been appointed head of the Steering Committee. Mayor Paar reported that Chief Coan's review was completed with a positive outcome. Discussion ensued regarding the department's use of the drug Narcan® and the lives that have been saved by this on-board drug. Mayor Paar stated that Narcan® is an investment that the department believes strongly in. Mayor Paar stated that the Dirty Shorts band would be kicking off Music in the Park on June 5, 2018 at Hidden Spring Park. He stated that Mr. Tom Lee and the Parks & Recreation Committee work extremely hard at providing these events for the public and that throughout the month of June & July different bands will be showcased on Tuesday evenings from 6:30 — 8:00 p.m. at Hidden Spring Park. He also stated that they are "family-friendly" so bring a blanket or chair along with the family. Mayor Paar stated that at the last meeting he forgot to mention "thank you" to those that volunteered their time for park cleanup. Administrator Statz and Mayor Paar reported that they recently completed a video with Anoka County's "Open for Business" program and stated that it is a great tool for businesses that need "free" assistance from filling out appropriate paperwork associated with an Assumed Name to advice on loans. Mayor Paar reminded individuals that Fete des Lacs is fast approaching with registrations for kickball/softball tournaments, run/walk, Paddle des Lacs being open and listing of events all available at the Festival's web site, Facebook page and the City's website. Mayor Paar recessed the regularly scheduled Council meeting to a Closed Executive Session at 7:45 p.m. Mayor Paar opened the regularly scheduled Council meeting at 9:17 p.m. XIII. ADJOURNMENT Council Adiourned their Regularly Scheduled Meeting of May 23, 2018 to a Closed Executive Session at 9:18 p.m. All in favor. Motion carried. Respectfully submitted by City Clerk, Teresa Bender Page 6 of 6 10 CITY OF CENTERVILLE 06/07/1812:41 PM Page 1 Check Detail - June 13, 2018 Check Date Check# Vender Name Comments Amount 5/31/2018 001187E MINNESOTA DEPT OF REVENUE STATE W/H-PAY PERIOD 11 &11.01 Check Nbr 001187 MINNESOTA DEPT OF REVENUE 11.172.39 5/31/2018 001188E IRS/EFTPS FED W.H- PAY PERIOD 11 &11.01 $2,338.85 5/31/2018 001188E IRS/EFTPS FICA/MED W/H- PAY PERIOD 11&11.01 $3,869.98 Check Nbr 001188 IRS/EFTPS $6,208.83 5/31/2018 001189E PERA PERA W/H- PAY PERIOD 11 &11.01 Check Nbr 001189 PERA $3,021.99 5/31/2018 001190E OPTUM BANK- H.S.A. H.S.A.W/H-PAY PERIOD 11.01 Check Nbr 001190 OPTUM BANK- H.S.A. $185.42 6/7/2018 001191E PSN PERMITS&FEES-SERV THRU 5-31-18 $446.60 6/7/2018 001191E PSN UTILITY PYMTS-SERV THRU 5-31-18 $219.11 6/7/2018 001191E PSN MISC.-SERV THRU 5-31-18 $6.00 6/7/2018 001191E PSN UTILITY PYMTS-SERV THRU 5-31-18 219.12 Check Nbr 001191 PSN $890.83 6/7/2018 001192E TASC FLEX SPENDING Check Nbr 001192 TASC $258.32 6/7/2018 031856 SUN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY LIFE INS. -JUNE 2018 $82.27 6/7/2018 031856 SUN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY DISABLITY INS-JUNE 2018 148.96 Check Nbr 031856 SUN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY $231.23 6/13/2018 031871 ALLSTREAM 2085 W CEDAR ST-SERV THRU 6-22-18 Check Nbr 031871 ALLSTREAM $88.31 6/13/2018 031872 ANOKA COUNTY TREASURY ADD S-TAG 2598-PORT 2-BROADBAND $83.33 6/13/2018 031872 ANOKA COUNTY TREASURY ADD S-TAG 2598-PORT 2-BROADBAND $83.33 6/13/2018 031872 ANOKA COUNTY TREASURY ADD S-TAG 2598-PORT 2-BROADBAND $83.3 Check Nbr 031872 ANOKA COUNTY TREASURY X250.00 6/13/2018 031873 BENDER,TERESA 2 FRAMES&2 CARDS Check Nbr 031873 BENDER,TERESA $20.68 6/13/2018 031874 BRIAN NELSON INSPECTION SERVIC ELECTRICAL INSPECTIONS Check Nbr 031874 BRIAN NELSON INSPECTION SERVIC X400.00 6/13/2018 031875 CENTENNIAL LAKES POLICE DEPT POLICE SERVICES-JUNE 2018 Check Nbr 031875 CENTENNIAL LAKES POLICE DEPT $72.916.75 6/13/2018 031876 CENTERPOINT ENERGY 6970 LAMOTTE DR-SERV THRU 5-24-18 $37.08 6/13/2018 031876 CENTERPOINT ENERGY 1785 PELTIER LAKE DR-SERV THRU 5-24-18 $28.61 6/13/2018 031876 CENTERPOINT ENERGY 1880 MAIN ST-SERV THRU 5-24-18 $95.80 6/13/2018 031876 CENTERPOINT ENERGY 2085 W CEDAR ST-SERV THRU 5-24-18 $103.70 6/13/2018 031876 CENTERPOINT ENERGY 1737 MAIN ST-SERV THRU 5-24-18 15.36 Check Nbr 031876 CENTERPOINT ENERGY $280.55 6/13/2018 031877 CITY OF CENTERVILLE-MASTERCA MULCH-CITY HALL $85.68 6/13/2018 031877 CITY OF CENTERVILLE-MASTERCA AD FOR P.W. MAINT WORKER $76.99 6/13/2018 031877 CITY OF CENTERVILLE- MASTERCA SUPPLIES $548.23 6/13/2018 031877 CITY OF CENTERVILLE- MASTERCA PORTABLE GENERATOR&COVER $718.99 6/13/2018 031877 CITY OF CENTERVILLE-MASTERCA PDF-SPECIFICATIONS FOR SAFETY COVERS FOR $46.00 6/13/2018 031877 CITY OF CENTERVILLE-MASTERCA OFFICE SUPPLIES $17.30 6/13/2018 031877 CITY OF CENTERVILLE-MASTERCA TRUCK PARTS $286.98 6/13/2018 031877 CITY OF CENTERVILLE-MASTERCA ENDICA FEES&POSTAGE $109.95 6/13/2018 031877 CITY OF CENTERVILLE-MASTERCA CREDIT- DAYTIMER -$38.92 6/13/2018 031877 CITY OF CENTERVILLE- MASTERCA FUEL $175.47 6/13/2018 031877 CITY OF CENTERVILLE-MASTERCA WATER COOLER- REPLACE DESTROYED COOLER AT $429.46 6/13/2018 031877 CITY OF CENTERVILLE- MASTERCA FUEL 724.49 Check Nbr 031877 CITY OF CENTERVILLE-MASTERCA X3,180.62 6/13/2018 031878 CITY OF CIRCLE PINES JUNE 2018 POLICE BLDG $5,416.67 6/13/2018 031878 CITY OF CIRCLE PINES JUNE 2018 POLICE BLDG $281.98 Check Nbr 031878 CITY OF CIRCLE PINES $5,698.65 6/13/2018 031879 CITY OF ROSEVILLE MAY PHONE SERVICES $93.94 6/13/2018 031879 CITY OF ROSEVILLE MAY PHONE SERVICES $93.94 6/13/2018 031879 CITY OF ROSEVILLE IT SERVICES $418.75 6/13/2018 031879 CITY OF ROSEVILLE IT SERVICES $418.75 6/13/2018 031879 CITY OF ROSEVILLE IT SERVICES $418.75 6/13/2018 031879 CITY OF ROSEVILLE IT SERVICES $418.75 Check Nbr 031879 CITY OF ROSEVILLE $1,862.88 11 CITY OF CENTERVILLE 06/07/1812:41 PM Page 2 Check Detail - June 13, 2018 Check Date Check# Vender Name Comments Amount 6/13/2018 031880 CONNEXUS ENERGY STREET LIGHTS-395653-219699-SERV THRU 5-23-18 $63.35 6/13/2018 031880 CONNEXUS ENERGY 2085 W CEDAR ST-SERV THRU 5-21-18 $299.53 6/13/2018 031880 CONNEXUS ENERGY 6800 20TH- RADIO FOR SCADA-SERV THRU 5-21-18 $9.27 6/13/2018 031880 CONNEXUS ENERGY STREET LIGHTS- 395653-219678-SERV THRU 5-23-18 $51.33 6/13/2018 031880 CONNEXUS ENERGY 6800 20TH- RADIO FOR SCADA-SERV THRU 5-21-18 $9.27 6/13/2018 031880 CONNEXUS ENERGY 6900 20TH AVE-LIFT STAT-SERV THRU 5-21-18 $71.08 6/13/2018 031880 CONNEXUS ENERGY 7100-20TH AVE N-TRAF SG-SERV THRU 5-21-18 $79.40 6/13/2018 031880 CONNEXUS ENERGY 7087-20TH AVE-WATER TOWER-SERV THRU 5-21-18 $54.69 Check Nbr 031880 CONNEXUS ENERGY X637.92 6/13/2018 031881 DOG WASTE DEPOT DOG WASTE ROLL BAGS Check Nbr 031881 DOG WASTE DEPOT $117.99 6/13/2018 031882 EMBEDDED SYSTEMS INC 6 MONTH SIREN MAINTENANCE Check Nbr 031882 EMBEDDED SYSTEMS INC $553.50 6/13/2018 031883 IRRIGATION BY DESIGN,INC. SPRING STARTUP OF IRRIGATION SYSTEM Check Nbr 031883 IRRIGATION BY DESIGN,INC. $229.68 6/13/2018 031884 LANGERS TREE SERVICE REMOVE COTTONWOOD TREES&DEBRIS Check Nbr 031884 LANGERS TREE SERVICE $1,400.00 6/13/2018 031885 MARCO,INC. MONTHLY CHARGES- KONICA MINOLTA AGREEMENT Check Nbr 031885 MARCO,INC. $250.35 6/13/2018 031886 MN DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH WATER TEST- 2ND QTR 2018 Check Nbr 031886 MN DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH $2,011.00 6/13/2018 031887 NORTH MEMORIAL HEALTH PRE-EMPLOYMENT EXAMS- B. KALLMAN&3. DRILLING Check Nbr 031887 NORTH MEMORIAL HEALTH $228.00 6/13/2018 031888 PRESS PUBLICATIONS COMP PLAN $41.26 6/13/2018 031888 PRESS PUBLICATIONS PUBLIC HEARING-P&Z- DEFOE $64.19 Check Nbr 031888 PRESS PUBLICATIONS $105.45 6/13/2018 031889 PRO CARE COMPANIES,INC. MAY LAWN MOWING-CENTERVILLE RD $2,200.00 6/13/2018 031889 PRO CARE COMPANIES,INC. MAY LAWN MOWING-CITY HALL $400.00 6/13/2018 031889 PRO CARE COMPANIES,INC. MAY LAWN MOWING-PARKS&TRAILS 5 600.00 Check Nbr 031889 PRO CARE COMPANIES,INC. $8,200.00 6/13/2018 031890 SHORELINE LANDSCAPING SHORE LINE STABLIZATION PHASE 1 &2 Check Nbr 031890 SHORELINE LANDSCAPING $69,682.00 6/13/2018 031891 SYMANTEC CREDIT-SYMC COMPLETE SECURITY&CONTROL -$485.26 6/13/2018 031891 SYMANTEC SYMC COMPLETE SECURITY&CONTROL7$ 20.00 Check Nbr 031891 SYMANTEC $234.74 6/13/2018 031892 WSB&ASSOCIATES 2040 COMP PLAN-SERV THRU 4-30-18 Check Nbr 031892 WSB&ASSOCIATES X3,891.75 6/13/2018 031893 AIRFRESH INDUSTIRES,INC. PORTABLE RESTROOM-ACORN CREEK PARK $105.00 6/13/2018 031893 AIRFRESH INDUSTIRES,INC. PORTABLE RESTROOMS-ROYAL MEADOWS PARK $105.00 6/13/2018 031893 AIRFRESH INDUSTIRES,INC. PORTABLE RESTROOMS-TRACY MCBRIDE PARK $105.00 6/13/2018 031893 AIRFRESH INDUSTIRES,INC. PORTABLE RESTROOMS-LAURIE LAMOTTE PARK $105.00 6/13/2018 031893 AIRFRESH INDUSTIRES,INC. PORTABLE RESTROOMS-EAGLE PARK $105.00 Check Nbr 031893 AIRFRESH INDUSTIRES.INC. &525.00 Total Checks$184,734.83 voided ck# 31857 12 CENTENNIAL LAKES POLICE DEPT Check Register-Police GL without invoice numbers Page: 1 Check Issue Dates: 6/5/2018-6/8/2018 Jun 08, 2018 11:47AM Report Criteria: Report type: Summary GL Check Ck No Description Check Period Issue Date Payee Amount 06/18 06/08/2018 12039 ABRAMS &SCHMIDT LLC LEGAL FEES 1,179.50 06/18 06/08/2018 12040 APPLIED CONCEPTS, INC NEW SQUAD SETUP 2,667.50 06/18 06/08/2018 12041 COVERALL OF THE TWIN CITIES INC JUNE CLEANING SERVICE 780.00 06/18 06/08/2018 12042 DEPUTY REGISTRAR#150 3 FORFEITURE VEH TRANSFERS 67.25 06/18 06/08/2018 12043 DON'S CIRCLE SERVICE, INC VEHICLE REPAIRS &MTC 177.00 06/18 06/08/2018 12044 41MPRINT, INC FOAM FOOTBALLS JUNIOR BADGES 520.88 06/18 06/08/2018 12045 FRATTALLONES HARDWARE, INC. FRIDGE LIGHT BULB 2.99 06/18 06/08/2018 12046 WILLIAM JACOBSON PHOTO PRINTING 28.08 06/18 06/08/2018 12047 NAC INVEST BURNING SMELL 3,258.75 06/18 06/08/2018 12048 PITNEY BOWES GLOBAL FINANCIAL POSTAGE METER LEASE 67.65 06/18 06/08/2018 12049 SHRED-N-GO, INC 3 CONSOLES 48.83 06/18 06/08/2018 12050 STREICHER'S, INC 9MM DUTY AMMO 647.88 06/18 06/08/2018 12051 TITAN ENERGY SYSTEMS, INC SERVICE CALL 5/24/2018 328.25 06/18 06/08/2018 12052 TOP GREEN CO. MOWING SERVICE 671.98 06/18 06/08/2018 12053 TRANS UNION LLC PRE-EMP INFO 5.30 06/18 06/08/2018 12054 TRANSUNION RISK&ALTERNATIVE INVESTIGATION EXPENSES 3616021 25.00 06/18 06/08/2018 12055 VERIZON WIRELESS CELL PHONES 1,082.17 06/18 06/08/2018 201808 Void Check .00 V 06/18 06/08/2018 201809 Void Check .00 V 06/18 06/08/2018 201810 Void Check .00 V 06/18 06/08/2018 201811 Void Check .00 V 06/18 06/08/2018 201812 Void Check .00 V 06/18 06/08/2018 201813 Void Check .00 V 06/18 06/08/2018 201814 Void Check .00 V 06/18 06/08/2018 201815 Void Check .00 V 06/18 06/08/2018 201816 Void Check .00 V 06/18 06/08/2018 201817 Void Check .00 V 06/18 06/08/2018 201818 Void Check .00 V 06/18 06/08/2018 201819 Void Check .00 V 06/18 06/08/2018 201820 Void Check .00 V 06/18 06/08/2018 201821 Void Check .00 V 06/18 06/08/2018 201822 Void Check .00 V 06/18 06/08/2018 201823 Void Check .00 V 06/18 06/08/2018 201824 Void Check .00 V Grand Totals: 11,559.01 M = Manual Check, V=Void Check 13 CENTENNIAL LAKES POLICE DEPT Check Register-Police GL without invoice numbers Page: 1 Check Issue Dates: 6/1/2018-6/4/2018 Jun 08, 2018 09:47AM Report Criteria: Report type: Summary GL Check Ck No Description Check Period Issue Date Payee Amount 06/18 06/04/2018 12013 ASPEN MILLS, INC CUSTOM PATCHES 337.85 06/18 06/04/2018 12014 BLAINE LOCK&SAFE, INC INSTALL NEW DOOR AND FRAME 3,037.00 06/18 06/04/2018 12015 GARY L FISCHLER & ASSOCIATES, P PSYCHOLOGICAL TESTING BG 625.00 06/18 06/04/2018 12016 O'REILLY AUTOMOTIVE, INC BATTERY 50.34 06/18 06/04/2018 12017 POPP COMUNICATIONS DSL LINE FOR WIFI 70.90 06/18 06/04/2018 12018 POST BOARD PEACE LIC B. GOETZKE 90.00 06/18 06/04/2018 12019 CITY OF ROSEVILLE MAY IT SERVICES 357.80 06/18 06/04/2018 12020 TASC COBRA 3RD QTR ADMIN FEE 60.30 Grand Totals: 4,629.19 Check#12011-12012& 12021 Payroll M = Manual Check, V=Void Check 14 CENTENNIAL LAKES POLICE DEPT Check Register-Police GL without invoice numbers Page: 1 Check Issue Dates: 5/31/2018-5/31/2018 Jun 08, 2018 01:54PM Report Criteria: Report type: Summary GL Check Ck No Description Check Period Issue Date Payee Amount 05/18 05/31/2018 201825 U S BANK VISA EFT-FLOWERS 1,605.90 Grand Totals: 1,605.90 M = Manual Check, V=Void Check 15 CENTENNIAL LAKES POLICE DEPT Check Register-Police GL without invoice numbers Page: 1 Check Issue Dates: 5/19/2018-5/31/2018 Jun 08, 2018 09:46AM Report Criteria: Report type: Summary GL Check Ck No Description Check Period Issue Date Payee Amount 05/18 05/30/2018 201807 OPTUM 2ND QTR HSA CONTRIBUTION RH 2,309.52 Grand Totals: 2,309.52 M = Manual Check, V=Void Check 16 CITY OF CENTERVILLE REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION entervi(Ce E77 Agenda Item# Department: Requested Council Meeting Date: Administration June 13, 2018 TITLE OF ISSUE: Trailside Park Shoreline Restoration Project BACKGROUND AND SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION: The City has included the Final Payment Invoice (#2811) from Shoreline Landscaping, quantities and workmanship have been deemed acceptable by Lead Project Coordinator Burmeister. The final amount is $69,682. Staff has brought to Council the original proposal, a change order and an application/acceptance for grant funding in the past associated with this project. Upon reimbursement from RCWD, Anoka County Conservation Distict and successful grant submission, the City will incur costs of approximately $24,240 of the proj ect. COST AND SOURCE(S) OF FUNDING: Initially incur $69,682 will be reimbursed approximately $45,000 with an end cost to City of$24,240/(Sewer) REQUESTED COUNCIL ACTION: Approve as submitted. For Clerk's Use: SUPPORTED DOCUMENTS ATTACHED Motion By: Resolution Ordinance Contract Minutes Plan Map Second By: Vote Record: A e Nay King Other(specify) None Love Paar Koski Montain Administration Department Use: Refer to: Consent Tabled Until: Regular Other: 17 Invoice Lanascap.ing Date Invoice# 291591 1 VYWOCE3 TRAIL CHIG;AGO CITY. MN 55013118 511 E12018 2811 Contact Information City of Centerville 10 Mom Street "ConholInf0rMation Centerville,MN 55038 Terms Due Date Due on receipt 5/18/2018 Item Description RIP Raft Amount Water Quality Enh-- Centerville Trail Side park shoreline Stabil ion phase —1 L Mobilization Mobilization 1 1,500,00 1,500.00 Traffic Control Traffic Control 1 700,00 700.00 Rock OUR RIP Rion 115 120,00 13,800.00 Fabric 12.5"Aide Fabric 385 2.00 770.00 Site Restoration Site Restoration 1 2,.250.00 2,250.00 Plant Material Live Demean Willow 125 8.00 1,000.00 Plant Material 4"Pots 74 10,180 740.00 Plant Material I"Plugs 540 3.00 1,620.00 Rock C1111 Rip Rap(Overage) 145 120.00 17,400.00 Water Quality Enh— Centerville Tw&Side Park Shoreline Stabilazatcarr Phase 2. 0.00 0.00 Rock CLIH Rip Rap 163 120.00 19,560.00 Fabric 12.5'Wide Fabric 365 2,00 730.00 Site Restoration Site Restoration 1 2,250.00 2,250.00 Plant Material Red Oster Dogwood 29 18.00 522.00 Rock CLIH Rip Rap(Overage) 57 120,00 6,840.00 Shoreline Landscaping guarantees all work for one year(Non-Transfirrable,i.e. homeowner to homeowner),with the exclusion of damage to shorelines from Ice Total $69,68100 heaving/jacking,or acts of God. All irrigation parts have a two year warranty. There is no warranty on any plant or rare materials. Shoreline Landscaping is not Payments/Credits $0.00 responsible for damage to sod or seed due to a lack of watering. All invoices are Due Upon Receipt. We reserve the right to apply a 1.5%finance charge per month to any invoice that has not been paid in full. Balance Due $69,692R0 _J Web Site 651-257-2655 step landscaping.net www.shorelinclandscaping.net 18 CITY OF CENTERVILLE REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION entervi(Ce E77 Agenda Item# Department: Requested Council Meeting Date: Finance 6/13/2018 TITLE OF ISSUE: Interfund Loan Repayment BACKGROUND AND SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION: In 2015, the Sewer and Water Fund each lent $100K to the Street Fund for the overages on the county road (Centerville Road)project. The Water Fund has already been paid back and this will clear up the loan from the Sewer Fund. Staff feels that the transfer is timely because the street fund has a substantial balance and it may be prudent to clear up the loan prior to having a new finance director on board to minimize any loose ends. The only interfund loan left is the $1.2M loan from the Sewer Fund to the Park Fund, associated with the Trail Connections and Hidden Spring Park projects. There is $60K in the Park Fund, but this probably isn't enough to warrant a transfer at this time. Additionally, the Park Fund is set to receive some substantial income this year from proposed developments, so an evaluation of this fund could be looked at near year-end. COST AND SOURCE(S) OF FUNDING: No net cost. REQUESTED COUNCIL ACTION: Motion to authorize transfer of$100,000 from the Water Fund to the Street Fund. For Clerk's Use: SUPPORTED DOCUMENTS ATTACHED Motion By: Resolution Ordinance Contract Minutes Plan Map Second By: X Vote Record: A e Nay King Other(specify) Love Paar Koski Montain Administration Department Use: Refer to: Consent Tabled Until: Regular Other: 19 COUNTY OF ANOKA CITY OF CENTERVILLE RES. #18-0 A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING REPAYMENT OF AN INTERFUND LOAN BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CENTERVILLE, MINNESOTA WHEREAS, in July of 2015 the Centerville City Council authorized an interfund loan in the amount of $100,000 from the Sewer Fund to the Street Fund to pay for extra costs related to a joint County/City road proj ect. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Centerville, County of Anoka, State of Minnesota, that the Finance Director is hereby authorized and directed to repay the loan from the Sewer Fund to the Street Fund and make the necessary accounting entries to reflect the payment. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City of Centerville this 13th day of June, 2018. Mayor, Jeff Parr Attest: City Clerk, Teresa Bender 20 CITY OF CENTERVILLE REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION entervi(Ce Agenda Item# Department: Requested Council Meeting Date: Administration June 13, 2018 TITLE OF ISSUE: Budget- 2019 (Alexandra House Funding) BACKGROUND AND SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION: The City has been approached by Alexandra House in the past and currently for funding for providing services. They are being proactive by ensuring that funding is available for their upcoming budget and ours. They are requesting for the City to budget $1,383 for 2019. Please note the services that they provided to Centerville residents in 2017. 2016 - $2,281; 2015 - $2,657; 2014 - $1,126 & 2013 - $1,531 COST AND SOURCE(S) OF FUNDING: General Fund REQUESTED COUNCIL ACTION: Recommend Council consider the inclusion of$1,383 for Alexandra House in your 2019 budget. For Clerk's Use: SUPPORTED DOCUMENTS ATTACHED Motion By: Resolution Ordinance Contract Minutes Plan Map Second By: Vote Record: A e Nay King Other(specify) Love Paar Koski Montain Administration Department Use: Refer to: Consent Tabled Until: Regular Other: 21 Phone: 763-780-2332 24-Hour Help Line/TTY: 763-780-2330 A I ex and r a Fax: 763-780-9696 www.alexandrahouse.org Working to end domesticH o u s e P.O.Box 490039 and sexual violence. Blaine,MN 55449-0039 June 1,2018 Mayor Jeff Paar City of Centerville 1880 Main St Centerville, MN 55038 Dear Mayor Jeff Paar, Alexandra House respectfully requests that the City of Centerville allocate funds to support services to be provided to Centerville residents by the Alexandra House Community Program in 2019. Alexandra House responds 24/7 to calls from the Anoka County Sheriff's Office and Mercy Hospital-Unity Campus as part of your community's public safety and public health infrastructure. The need for our services continues to grow.According to the 2015 Wilder Research Minnesota Homeless Study there was a 15%increase from 2012 in the number of people in domestic violence shelters. Each year, we assist victims of domestic and sexual violence in the City of Centerville-and we are the only agency providing these services in Anoka County. We help your residents with their immediate crisis and safety needs and assist them in moving beyond the violence to achieve long-term safety and independence. While our services are free to those we serve;they are not without costs.The attached/enclosed budget document details services provided to Centerville residents,the cost to provide these services,and the unsecured revenue we need to fully fund those services. You may be aware that Greater Twin Cities United Way eliminated over $4 million dollars in annual funding for domestic violence services this past year. For Alexandra House,this meant a $238,000 loss in funding for our Community Program services. Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions. I would welcome the opportunity to attend a city council meeting to discuss this funding request and respond to any questions you may have. Thank you very much for your consideration. Connie Moore 22 ALEXANDRA HOUSE, INC. City of Centerville Services Services Provided Provided in 2017 Protection Order Filings 2 Civil Court Hearings 1 Legal Representation on OFP's 1 Civil Legal Information &Advocacy 10 Child Support Advocacy 0 Arrest/Non-Arrest Victim Follow up 2 Lethality Assessment Follow Up 2 Criminal Court Hearings, Information &Advocacy 17 Anoka County Family Violence Waiver 0 Hospital Advocacy 2 Therapy 0 Community Support Groups 1 Child Care 0 Crisis Line 42 Crisis Intervention/Safety Planning 21 Sexual/Domestic Violence Information & Support 16 Interpreter Services 0 Food Shelf 0 Education/Employment/Benefits 2 Case Management 0 Transportation Assistance 0 Financial/Basic Needs Assistance 0 Housing Assistance 0 Youth Services - One on One Teen Advocacy 7 Youth Services - Teen Support Groups 0 Youth Services - Lino Lakes Juvenile Shelter Groups 0 Youth Services - Summer Outreach 0 Youth Services - Classroom Presentations # 0 TOTAL 126 2019 Budget Amount Cost of Services Provided to City of Centerville $ 3,458 Revenue allocated from other sources $ 2,075 Unsecured Revenue $ 1,383 23 CITY OF CENTERVILLE REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION entervi(Ce E77 Agenda Item# Department: Requested Council Meeting Date: Administration June 13, 2018 TITLE OF ISSUE: Approval of LG214 Premises Permit Application from Centennial Youth Hockey Association BACKGROUND AND SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION: The Youth Hockey Association is requesting to operate pull-tabs out of Wiseguys Pizza& Pub. Currently, Dead Broke Saddle Club is operating out of the location. COST AND SOURCE(S) OF FUNDING: N/A REQUESTED COUNCIL ACTION: Recommend Council approve the request as submitted. For Clerk's Use: SUPPORTED DOCUMENTS ATTACHED Motion By: Resolution Ordinance Contract Minutes Plan Map Second By: Vote Record: A e Nay King Other(specify) Love Paar Koski Montain Administration Department Use: Refer to: Consent Tabled Until: Regular Other: 24 M AN N E S GTA WNWAR. GA M K NA 1!]�� WIS Pagelol`2 LA214 Premisalms F00ii-VAt hIRMPISCISUCH'I Miummal F% $1150 ..................................................................................................-U-........... .............................................................................................................. ..................................................................................................................... ................x...........x................. ............................................... .................................................. ............__..........__.......................... 11. Ifthe premises blessed,attach a copy ol'your lease, theLG215 MISH the application and required attachments to., Lease for Lawful Gambling flmthdty� Minnesota Gambling Control Board S Z $150 annual prernmes permit fee,Ax each permit(non-refundable). 1711 West County Road B, Suite 300 oath 55 Make check payable to "State of MinnesotaZRoseville, PIN 113' Questions? Call 651-539-1900 and ask for Licensing. ............... .......... ............................................................... ............... .................................................................... ................................................... .................................................... ..................................................................................................... ..........................................................................................................................................._'**_'*'**'*=............. Pamer- lie. 011tHissonstwe DOW 00 DI Daytime Phone: ............ ............................................. ............................................................... Abu, C91 vw.9"A swo U�p;o'lr_yh jqlarnhhng mannapor: Daytime Phone: f7�..................................................... ............................................................................................................................ ....................................................................................................................... U11411111-1108 PREMISES XNFQRVURIDNI: ............................................................................................................................. ............ ........................................................................ .......... Ewanx name of q.�Ate wvrlia�e be conducted: _f ...........Ef.......... .................................................... ................. arry previous names for this location: -------------------------------................................................................................................................... E7t) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ��i Tounnilp An' 15 51- J) ..........................................................................................................................................................L.&PUMI:........ ............................:.:::.................................................................................................................. Mqnsr alp nkalAam own Me bOcky smane are ganUng wT to ccmrlun*T:� Yes N�o If no,attach LG215 Lease for Lawful Gambling Activity. A lease is not required if only a raffle will be conducted, any other orgamoven ranTAMg qwAdK9 at th's sAR Ion. Don't know Nksa� Bar bingo can only be conducted at a site where another form of lawful gambling is being conducted by he applying organk or another permitted organization. Electronic games can only be conducted at a site where paper pull-tabs are played. Wm ywr orywatiM n paesudy amouxted gamsho or AN WNT L.j ns ATIP0 L.J AM t W w in ............................................................................................. ................................................................................................................................................................................. M44 VALA hN,.i! MARY K 1110C1104.11 N'T 1 M1 FORM JVT 31)Fig M 1MMY HM 1 FAA P4114 MR!SAM 1101. ............................................................... ...................................................................................... A As /fj Bank www: 11 ...... ................................................... Rm&ASEEMS P401TWI: ............................................ 0%)Anj Batik Street Ahrkew: Apr, raw .01 i AAT TP Cost LA Y,,A roxxx wass i ............................................................................................................................ jr=L 1 EM 1 0 FU j a j JIM 11 it!HIM E F1 CNFF441171! STORAGE SVAATEIN�i: ................................................................... .............................................................................................................................................................. CRY: State: Z43 Cod x, 1 ev J& A . 04; A Af0AVLAIQ ! NON 017 V4 ............................................. -------------f---------------------------................. ..................................................!_ )"A or sty DIN ......................................... ................ .................................................... ---------- ............................................................................................................. ........... 25 6,115 Peg Premises Per Application .........................................................--------------------------- ACKNOWLEDGMENT BY LOCAL UNIT OFGOVERNMENT: APPROVAL BY RESOLUTION CITY APPROVAL COUNTY APPROVAL for a gambling premises for a gambling premises located within city limits located in a township em iety - city Na : --- County Name: Date Approved by City Councik Data Approved by County Bozird= ---------------------- ................................................................................ f 'a 0 c in located C to g dM asA b it' i N me eyliety C (tate pp C l_ C o A a e by in r ve be h m ", Resolution Number, -—---- Resolution Number: -------- ................................................................................---------------------------------------- a u , R (If none, APPROVAL meeting minutes,) (If none.,attach unerring rninutesa) Signature of City Personnel: Signature of County Personnel, ..........................................................................-—---------------------------------------------- Title: ... T:Clea Date Signed: ....................... TOWNSHIP NAME: ...................................... Complete below only if required by the county. Local unit of government On behalf of the township, I and that the organization is applying to conduct gambling activity within the township limits, must sign. (A township has no statutory authority to approve or deny orr application, per Minnesota Statutes 349,213, Subs, 2.) ...................................................................... Print Township Name ——----------------- -_ L_'Signature o "Fowns in tcera -9 itle: ___ Date Signed __.......... ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND OATH 1, 1 hereby consent that local law enforcement officers, 6, 1 assume-oil responsibility for the fair and lawful operation of the Board or its agents, and the commissioners of all activities to be conducted. revenue or public safety and their agents may enter 7, i will familiarize Myself with the laws of Minnesota governing and inspect the premises. lawful gambling arid rules of the Board and agree, if licensed, 2. ­Fhe Board and its agents, and the commissioners of to abide by those laws and rules, including amendments to revenue and public safety and their agents, are them authorized to 'inspect the bank records of the garobling account whenever necessary to fulfill requirements oB. Arry changes in application informatr n will be submitted to the f current gambling rules and law. Board no later than ter days after the change has taken effect, 3, 1 have read this application and all information 0, 1 undersstand that failure to provide required information or I submitted to the Board is true, accurate, and complete, - providing false or misleading information may result in the 4, All required information has been fully disclosed, denial or revocation of me license, 5, 1 am the chief executive officer of the organization. 1-0, 1 understand the fee is non-refundable regardless of license approval/dental, Signature of Chief Executive Officer(designee may not sign) Date auto privacy notice,The information requested art this fit"orrnatrai whe.n received by the Board., form(arm any attachments)will be near' by the All other information provided eflil be Attorney General,Corernostoners of Gambling Control Board(Board,to determine your private data about your ar, lionization until Adn-Anistration,Minnesota Management A, organization's quaflfications;tote involved ir lawful the Board issues the permit, When the Budget,and Revenue;Legislative Auditor, b And al and internal nal Golan gramblins activities in Your unionization has Board issues the permit,all information none; C n Revenue; u Is a I ol l€riFiat!(to refUSe to SUPPlY the information; however, provided%oll hereine public, Ta.F file Board regulatory agencies;anyone pursuant to rink,all infoi-ii nation court order,other individuadis and agencies your organization refuses to supply this information, does net Gnus a par so aided re d by state or federal lay 'me Board may not be able to deternnne your pro mvens private,with the specifically authorize organization's qualifications and,as a consequence, excretion of your organization's narne and ?-a have,access to the infienrokion; individuals v may refuse to issue a permit, If your obvinization address which will ren ain public, Private and agencies flor which law or legal order supplies the information requested,the Board will be data about your organFeation are avalkitsw authorizes a new me or sharing of be,tprocesyour organization's application, Your to: Board rnw ernbers,Board staff tease is once was after-thugiven; and I lo s -roanization'sns�o and address will be pu[Ar: work requires access to the infor ff Mahon; anyone with your wr two consent. ................................... --—---------——--- This form will be rnade avalbode it)alternative forinal,Le,large print,braille,upon request, .... ......._­ . ­............................ ----------------- Ars -------------- Art ewco poeirfunfly ervivoyar, 26 CITY OF CENTERVILLE REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION entervi(Ce E77 Agenda Item# Department: Requested Council Meeting Date: Admin./Bldg. June 13, 2018 TITLE OF ISSUE: Encroachment Agreement 7130 Mill Road -Fence BACKGROUND AND SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION: The owner of the above stated address has submitted for and obtained a fence permit along with an encroachment agreement, fees have been paid and both the Building Inspector and Building Official have inspected the property and determined that the location of the fence would not hinder drainage on the parcel or surrounding parcels. Please see the attached Exhibit A. COST AND SOURCE(S) OF FUNDING: Paid for by Homeowner(Recording Fees) REQUESTED COUNCIL ACTION: Approve as submitted. For Clerk's Use: SUPPORTED DOCUMENTS ATTACHED Motion By: Resolution Ordinance Contract Minutes Plan Map Second By: Vote Record: A e Nay King Other(specify) None Love Paar Koski Montain Administration Department Use: Refer to: Consent Tabled Until: Regular Other: 27 ZONING PERMIT Receipt# CITY OF CENTER LLE,MINNESOTA Date: _---------........ � ~kra tt. .. ........ Owner: I e I I I y 11 M ace €info Builder: Homeowner ......... ........... .......... Rd Address: 713 ilkAddress. .................... e ............ �trcl r i t : tft Phone : t hone : . ........ ................ License#: DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED WORK (Check One) Accessory Structure Beekeeping 0 Driveway Repair L1 Driveway New Fence Fool Type ofConstruction: Number oisms: (1) (2) Valuation Area/Volume: FEF -- m__--------------- m,mmm'rr N ..................----- FEES t ....-- .. .. .4cccs itructu c Permit C........... ------ ... .......... Beekeeping, � raik ...........—______ r ---.........tr... Dr vrn i opn Permit – - .............v 1 iirtvr''WOt V`Rew perrnit ............. __ ------ Fencc Perrait $60,00 _____ Foal 1rr rrnar .... lint roaacitrrterzi Too ent 1 SCANNED ................ . Other: .............------- __ .......... lla r; ................--------- ---........ This permit is granted upon the express condition that the person,partnership,firm or corporation to olm it i s granted,together will,is agents, employees,won en and subcontractors agree to abide by and conform to all Codes of the City of Centerville regarding the grading,con ction, alteration,maintenance,repair and d emolition of buildings within the City,and the on a permit may be revoked at any time capon evidence of violations of any of the Provisions of said Code. Issuance of a zoning perm it is not to be construed or relied upon as a war ramp,guarantee, or representation on the par t of the City that the construction or finished product covered under this permit is necessarily in conformation with the state building code or other applicable construction standards. The City assumes no responsibility or liability for damages arising out of the issuance of this permit. Suspension or abandonment of such work for a period of one hundred and eighty(180)days shall result in the automatic revocation of this permit as provided by City Code. I have completed or examined this application,and understand that by the City granting this permit and my signature placed below 1 am cutting 41fill, ot violate or cancel the provision of y other State or Loca( w regulating co truction or the perfor ce of truction, r BUT14)INIG INSPECTOR 28 APPLICATION FOR FENCE PERMIT PRINT all information o this application. F :,: Dome- res y> 1 593-131 Night: Address; itlre ' tttcc dip; Location of Property: Site Address/Hours;No. Legal Description of � Sire of Lot or Parech CAUTent x f r. _m.._m...........................Est.Cost of Project: n IType ofConstruction: all that 1 e or Under,- Chain nd• m1 Wood: f Link- ' 1"or Over: [ff(A Separate Building Permit is -split Ei (Front ); Linear Footage Decorative(From Yard): North —South __..East West Other(formidb5 eb FOCAW c% / Phone: License Anticipated n Date: Estimated Completion ata_I_/ sketch drawn to scale must he a shod sho ' 111 A.Lot lines and corner pins;B.Dimensions of existing buildings d proposed new fence; ,Distances from lot lines and buildings. .All Easements(Utility drainage)age) .Utility lines enteringthe Career pins must be established and marked by the owner and visiblefor inspection. copies f construction plans l submitted. Property Line Setbacks: Front the fl, Rear Setbacla los it. -------------- Looking at the Property fro the street, Telt Sideline: / i id lists . Live art a o Work in Might of q I hereby declare that I am the owner,or authorized agent of the ram �of R ° I =to construct or we herein described in t tlt�w with s and andsarvas t govern said improvement °hin the City of Centerville and that the foregoing infismatian contained on this application is a am and convot statement of my finonfiess. All provisionsoflaws and ordinanow governing &a type of ill be complied with whether specified herein or not. The graming of a permit does not presurse to give auffority to violate€r carcel the provisions sof any other state or local law regatsfing Fence or construction dsocof f understand that any utility t must be moved a cook of addiflons or alterations to the property will be at my expense and I will be responsiblefor the east of the plan check of Due application en though I do not continue the project. I also understand that the City of Centerville is not verifying property lines,they are only courtly inspecting that I have obtained i ate of survey or have crossed the sending earomments. I agree to be hold entirely responsible for the placement of the fend and if in the future it is deterndeed to be a drainnefnt!Uty easement It will be removedt my largesse d if in the totem it is determined to be on the property line or neighbors property,without proper abutting i hl r approval Ifiled with the City of Centerville it will she be removed at my sources. Fessuo cash,not Boodle water draimgtfflowage. Signature of Applicant: UAW-�n DonewHr - 1 H lowing to be completed by the City) Fence Permit Approved By, ---- � Date: f 1 Fence Fait Denied For Attached Lefters From Abuffing Property Owners on File rem City. .............._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._. Vii ;---_--__ ------" � Core- TOTAL ore- T ` i,FEES $--10.00 i 29 Vf1j, JE'�`IC APPLICATION SKETCH—CYFY OF CENTERVILLE Name 0 Address -Date 12- --- ----m -- ALL T UST l DRAWN T d containthe following i infer atB t o � abuff` � eta and alleys with street names, dimensions melons of lot or lots, all existing buildings on lots, all existing utility lane kind easetnems, and distances firom all property lines. Crosshatch all existing buildings. Label property fines. 0 Indicate North in the Circle togAMr-AL l Ora Ff 6jj MFIrg ILL 14P�tc 30 CITY OF CENTERVILLE REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION entervi(Ce E77 Agenda Item# Department: Requested Council Meeting Date: Administration/Engineering/PW June 13, 2018 TITLE OF ISSUE: Comprehensive Plan BACKGROUND AND SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION: Attached is the draft 2040 Comprehensive Plan for the City. All chapters have been previously reviewed, individually, by both the Planning and Zoning Commission and the City Council. Upon approval of the draft, it would be sent to neighboring jurisdictions, other state agencies and the Met Council for review and comment. The deadline for such submittal is June 30, 2018. COST AND SOURCE(S) OF FUNDING: Funds previously committed. REQUESTED COUNCIL ACTION: Motion to approve distribution of the draft Comprehensive Plan, for Met Council and jurisdictional review. For Clerk's Use: SUPPORTED DOCUMENTS ATTACHED Motion By: Resolution Ordinance Contract Minutes Plan Map Second By: Vote Record: A e Nay King Other(specify) Draft Comprehensive Plan Love Paar Koski Montain Administration Department Use: Refer to: Consent Tabled Until: Regular Other: 31 ' 2040 en `f�� COMPREHENSIVE tero PLAN 32 Centerville 2040 Comprehensive Plan: Al .'. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS i.. : Centerville City Council Jeff Paar— Mayor Russ Koski Steve King D. Love Matt Montain Planning and Zoning Commission Darrin Mosher— Chair Kimberly Ganzel Mark Haiden Linda Broussard Nick Twohy City Administrator/Engineer Mark Statz, PE WSB &Associates Eric Maass, AICP Olivia Dorow-Hovland, AICP Candidate :e tel-yilI Centerville 2040 Comprehensive Plan TABLE OF CONTENTS a t 0 { W. r.. k.. ... i . [.: I ' enteryifte I 34 � r Ae enteryil 35 Centerville 2040 . x, CHAPTER 1: COMMUNITY PROFILE The purpose of the background section is to understand the characteristics of Centerville and the current qualities and challenges of the community. The comprehensive planning process considers the future of the community based on existing characteristics. To help facilitate planning efforts it is important to understand all factors affecting the city. The following sections will discuss demographics, facilities, natural resources, housing, water resources, and the transportation system. This background information has served as a guide for participants in the planning process. The City's last Comprehensive Plan was officially adopted in 2008. The 2040 Comprehensive Plan now required by the Metropolitan Council focuses on planning for the next 20 years. This plan is especially important for Centerville because it will guide the community to full build-out. There are very few vacant parcels remaining in the city, and by the next time the Comprehensive Plan is updated, Centerville may be focusing on infill and redevelopment rather than development of any vacant parcels. This Comprehensive Plan provides a vision and plan for what the fully-built community will look like, and how it will function. 1 ; In 1967 the Minnesota Legislature created the Metropolitan Council to plan and coordinate the orderly development of the seven-county metropolitan area. Minnesota law requires every municipality and county within the metropolitan area to prepare and submit a comprehensive plan to the Metropolitan Council that addresses all required components of the 2040 Regional Development Framework "ThriveMSP 2040". The City's plan must be consistent with the Metropolitan Council's system plans. To assist local governments in this effort, the Metropolitan Council issues a "Systems Statement" to each community that describes the specific areas that must be addressed as part of the local comprehensive plan. The City of Centerville was issued an updated system statement on September 17, 2015 and submitted its 2040 Comprehensive Plan to the adjacent and affect communities for their review in June of 2018. The City of Centerville submitted its 2040 Comprehensive Plan to Metropolitan Council in December of 2018. Chapter 1 Page 1 36 Centerville 2040 Centerville's 2040 Comprehensive Plan update will incorporate regional policy and metro-wide goals while also integrating important local goals, objectives and preferred outcomes. Both regional Thrive 2040 outcomes as well as the local goals and priorities identified in Chapter 2 will form the foundational lens of this comprehensive plan, guiding decision-making and informing the content of each subsection. The chapters that follow will build on this community profile and an understanding of who and what is here now to create a vision for who and what this community will be by the year 2040. Each year the City holds a seven day community festival titled Fete des Lacs that honors the City's history and takes advantage of the beautiful parks, lakes and trails that surround the City. At the 2017 Fete des Lacs event, project members talked with dozens of community members to inform them of the updating of the City's comprehensive plan and to gather feedback on a variety of topics including key strategies, areas of opportunity, residential development, and to better understand how theyviewed their community.The word cloud below is a representation of what was heard from those participants. Historic Fun Safety CL Family Chapter 1 Page 2 37 Centerville 2040 Y Community Designation: The Metropolitan Council identifies Centerville as an Emerging Suburban Edge (Map 1-1) community. Emerging suburban edge communities offer both connections to urban amenities and the proximity to open spaces that characterizes a rural lifestyle. The growth patterns in these communities demonstrate the challenges of changing from rural to suburban. New developments are typically built in a traditional suburban pattern. Emerging suburban edge communities are expected to plan for forecasted population and household growth. Current estimates show average growth of 661/6 in population, 87% in households, and 66% in employment over three decades. Chapter 1 Page 3 38 C !i I (a — � in rr111 •a,- my o55� 41) U Q � o U 1 E O �o !! L) p N o I 0 1 i � i a v cu J p ® c � I I v I I i i i i I i i m i e r J I ! a� i U 1 i - 1 I 1 1 I � O 7 j ! ! z cu i o c i i i i 0 1 i I c i C � � ; O E cc m C I U C C _ m I U a � Q . Centerville 2040 The Metropolitan Council requires Centerville to plan for growth to the year 2040. Centerville also needs to plan for a community-wide transportation system. Connections need to be made between transportation, transit, pedestrian and bicycle facilities and land uses. The City needs to improve transportation connections and identify transit opportunities. The City must develop transition strategies to increase density and encourage infill development. Also, the Metropolitan Council requires that developing communities conserve, protect, and enhance natural resources by doing the following: • Conduct natural resource inventories • Adopt natural resource conservation techniques • Prepare local stormwater management plans • Include natural resources in the local park system • Implement Best Management Practices The Metropolitan Council has reviewed the city's plan to make sure it conforms to all metropolitan system plans, is consistent with requirements of Metropolitan Land Planning Act and is compatible with the plans of adjacent jurisdictions, including school districts. ,Vv, V..V V­ This section of the comprehensive plan provides a picture of the community as it exists today. Looking at the current demographic, social, physical and economic characteristics is an important step in planning for the future. Achieving the desired community vision starts with an understanding of the existing conditions and emerging trends. This section can also be used to help inform daily decision making and policy by staff and public officials by providing a clear understanding of the community. The City of Centerville is in the southeastern section of Anoka County (Figure 1). Centerville consists of roughly 2.5 square miles and lies approximately 25 miles northeast of the Minneapolis Central Business District(CBD) and 20 miles north of the St. Paul CBD. Centerville is unique in that it is completely surrounded by the City of Lino Lakes. Centerville's closest neighbors outside of Lino Lakes are the City of Hugo to the east and White Bear Township and the City of North Oaks to the south. Interstates 35E and 35 W lie almost directly west and east respectively of Centerville, with Main Street or CSAH 14 Chapter 1 Page 5 40 Centerville 2040 providing a direct connection to 35E. Centerville also has unique access to natural resources including Peltier and Centerville Lakes, and the Rice Creek Regional Park Reserve. 95 169 47 .......... Elk Rive rOA Gro j Easr Bethel ``\ F-11 L­ A,d­r St M % 47 -.Cerltei-ville Y % A� k �pl, r­ h Mea 36 th 1_01 Lake Gold nva.ley '4­1' ,k lis innea St. Paul Sh -i"A �,tt ­ 5 ede Pa ie . .q�G, G-1 Heig,t, ........ .... Map 1-2 — Community Context Centerville has a rich French-Canadian history with the first white settlers arriving to the area in the 1840's. They were trappers coming to the area for the abundant wildlife. Prior to the white settlers moving into the area the Dakota Indians lived here in the 1600s and 1700s. At that time, this area was covered with dense woodlands and many square miles of marshes, lakes, and Chapter 1 Page 6 41 Centerville 2040 waterways. The Dakotas abandoned their settlement in the late 1700's, but returned annually to harvest wild rice. Soon after, families from Canada arrived and settled in the area. Several descendants of these original settlers still live in Centerville. The City was officially established on August 11, 1857, when Minnesota was still a territory. At that time, Centerville was known as Centerville Township and encompassed the current City of Centerville and the City of Lino Lakes. The downtown area of Centerville was originally known as the French Section. German immigrants settled farther to the west in what is now part of the City of Lino Lakes. The pioneers cleared the land for farming and agriculture soon followed. Residents formed the Church of St. Genevieve of Paris. In 1956, residents organized the present Centennial School District #12. In an effort to reflect Centerville's history, in 1971 the city named Mill Road, Mound Trail, Progress Road, Sorel Street and Goiffon Road. Today, Centerville is a bustling residential community that retains some of its agricultural history. Centerville aims to honor its past as it looks to the future. Map 1-3 provides a base map depicting how the City as it presently exists. Chapter 1 Page 7 42 e �mOEM I------------------------------------ -----------------------— $ Ea ow � I o @ H z� � � o ma rc wa o �.� ww a 8 �oa �f ,W ---_ - - - - _ —– _ .�----- a ------------------------- ----------- w Flz J a Z - I E O II 0 U I 4J ®' m _On -------------------- wlw WQQ Q Centerville 2040 The City of Centerville has a history of actively planning for the future. The City's last plan was adopted in 2008. However, in 2006, Centerville underwent a rigorous planning process to develop the Downtown Master Plan and Development Guidelines. Below are brief summaries of these documents. 2008 Comprehensive Plan With the development of the 2008 plan, the City Council established a public participation process designed to include a wide variety of stakeholders including business owners, City officials and concerned citizens. At a town meeting, issues were identified that related to the future growth of the City: • Expand business and employment opportunities • Maintain low crime rate • Expand diversity of housing, including apartments, townhouses, senior housing and rental housing • Maintain small town atmosphere/community identity • Increases in taxes to accommodate growth are feared The plan was adopted by the City Council and reviewed by the Metropolitan Council. 2006 Downtown Master Plan & Redevelopment Guidelines In 2005 the City of Centerville hired Damon Farber Associates to lead a community task force to prepare a master plan, design guidelines and zoning amendments for downtown Centerville. The development of the master plan was accompanied by a market study completed in 2005 which helped define the quality and quantity of retail and housing which could be sustained in downtown Centerville. The purpose of the Master Plan & Development Guidelines was to establish an appropriate framework for future redevelopment of downtown as a vibrant Mixed-Use destination, to incorporate: • An overall vision for redevelopment of the area, including the pattern, form and character of new development and open space in the interest of creating a cohesive traditional mixed-use downtown. Chapter 1 Page 9 44 Centerville 2040 • A framework of transportation improvements needed to support the redevelopment of the area and to create appropriate levels of parking as well as vehicular, bicycle and pedestrian access to the downtown. • A set of design standards to guide the architectural quality of new development within the downtown area. The master plan was also coordinated with the plans for the redesign and expansion of County State Aid Highway 14 (Main Street). The master plan integrated efforts to calm traffic, provide a safe pedestrian environment and provide guidelines for buildings that respected the pedestrian scale and encouraged walkability. Since the Downtown Master Plan encompassed such a large portion of Centerville, its principles and guidelines were utilized extensively in the City's 2030 Comprehensive Plan update. Figure 2 shows the downtown master plan that was developed. The Downtown Master Plan was developed at the height of the economy just before the economic downturn in 2007 Its development will be a future priority for the City and may require updating of the downtown plan to reflect current market realities. DOWNTOWN MASTER PLAN FUTURE PRIORITY rix ra;! r-7 to 99 rw A; 174 ylw ..... ... I UZI flu r r T nr7t Chapter 1 Page 10 45 Centerville 2040 Y D: V., Population In 2016, Centerville's population was estimated at 3,958 people. The chart below shows census population data for Centerville, indicating that Centerville has historically had a smaller population in comparison to its surrounding communities (TABLE 1). After experiencing a doubling in population between 1980 and 1990, and again between 1990 and 2000. Centerville's growth has since remained more moderate and stable. City population 1970 - 2016 Centerville & Surrounding Communities 25,000 20,000 Centerville 15,000 Lino Lakes 0 Hugo CL 10,000 —0—Circle Pines U --41--North Oaks 5,000 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2016 Source: U.S. Census 2010 and ACS 2015 Estimates Chapter 1 Page 11 46 Centerville 2040 Age demographics The demographic information was collected by utilizing information from the 2008 Comprehensive Plan, Metropolitan Council forecasts, and 2010 Census data. Like many other communities around the country, Centerville is experiencing an aging population. The percent of the population within the 40-49, 50-59, 60-74, and 74 and over age groups have all increased from 2000 to 2010. Providing adequate housing and services for residents of all ages has been and will continue to be a priority for the City of Centerville. Centerville is also seeing a decrease in younger residents. TABLE 2 below shows a decrease in the percentage of residents in the 20 to 29 age group from 2000 to 2010. The median age in the City of Centerville in 2010 was 33.2. Age of Population Centerville Residents, 2000 &2010 75 and older ................. ................. ............... ................ 60 to 74 years ::�...................... .............................. ............................... 50 to 59 years ::�............................ ............................................................. .............................................................. ................................ ............................................................ ................ 40 to 49 years ::�.................................................. 0 ao .................................................................................................................. 30 to 39 years ............................................................................. .................................................. ................................................... ................................ ................................................. ................... 20 to 29 years ::�.................................................. ....................... ........................ 15 to 19 years ::�..................... ................................................................................. .................................................................................. ................................ ................................................................................ .................................... 5 to 14 years ::�.................................................. .............................................. ............................................... ................... ................ Under 5 Years ::�......................................................... 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% Percentage of population :.,:.:2000 2010 Source: Decennial Census Chapter 1 Page 12 47 Centerville 2040 Y Race Like other nearby communities, Centerville is not seeing a very large increase in the diversity of its population. From 2010 to 2015, the rate of non-white individuals in Centerville increased only slightly. It is anticipated that the number of non-white individuals in Centerville will continue to grow as a small percentage of the overall population. Table 3 shows that Asian alone is the second largest racial ethnicity in Centerville after White alone, at 3.48 percent. White alone 94.140/6 American-Indian and Alaska Native alone 0.43% Asian alone 3.48% Hispanic or Latino 1.48% Two or more races 0.46% 100% Source: U.S. Census Bureau Education Centerville's population is consistently remaining educated. In 2010, the percentage of Centerville residents with a bachelor's degree or higher was 36.9 percent. In 2015, that number was 34.6 percent (TABLE 4). Maintaining a highly-educated workforce is just one key component to attracting new employers to Centerville. .......................................................................................... Less than high school graduate 5.730/6 High school graduate (includes equivalency) 20.85% Some college, no degree 23.44% Associate's degree 15.41% Bachelor's degree 27,24% Graduate or professional degree 7.33% Source: 2015 ACS 5-Year Estimates Chapter 1 Page 13 48 Centerville 2040 Poverty Rats ........... According to the 2012 — 2016 American Community Survey, ° 1% of the Centerville Anoka County 7.71° population was living below Centerville 1.0% the federal poverty level. However an additional 6.3% of Circle Pines 4,0% residents were between 100% Hugo 5.2% and 149% and another 3.3% of the City's population were Lino Lakes 5.2% between 150-184% of the federal poverty level. The 2016 North Oaks 2.3% federal poverty level for a family of four was $24,250. Table 5. Source: 2015 ACS 5-Year Estimates V According to the Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages conducted by the Minnesota Department of Employment and Economic Development there were 363 jobs in Centerville in the year 2000. The 2000 average annual wage in Centerville was $29,456. In 2016 the totaljobs in Centerville jumped to 430 and with it the average annual wage increased to $44,534, a 51% increase. In that same timespan, annual wages in Anoka County jumped from $33,187 to $49,918, a 50%increase. Both Centerville and Anoka County have outpaced the 7-County metropolitan region which saw an average annual wage of $39,062 jump to $58,111, a 49% increase. Centerville is home to retail and service jobs, as well as some industry. The Metropolitan Council's employment forecast predicts that Centerville will have 540 jobs by 2020, 560 jobs by 2030 and finally, 590 jobs by 2040. The 2040 job figure signifies an overalljob gain for Centerville of 160 jobs by 2040. Accommodation and Food Services 77 All Other Industries 256 Construction 58 Chapter 1 Page 14 49 Centerville 2040 Y Other Services, Ex. Public Admin 0 Pubic Administration 11 Wholesale Trade 28 Total: 430 Table 6. Source: Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages, MIN DEED. Forecasts for Centerville The Metropolitan Council has developed growth forecasts for Centerville by decade, addressing the projected population, number of households, and number ofjobs. The total population of the City of Centerville is expected to grow by 102 people by the year 2040, a very modest increase.The City can expect a growth of around 149 households and 160 newjobs by 2040. As an emerging suburb, Centerville will accommodate population growth and economic development largely through strategic new development. 2010 3,792 1,315 409 2016 3,958 1,351 430 2020 3,840 1,400 540 2030 3,930 1,450 560 2040 4,060 1,500 590 2016-2040 change +102 +149 +160 Table 7. Source: Metropolitan Council Forecasts Household Income The median and average household income in Centerville is generally consistent with other nearby communities as shown in TABLE 8 below. The median and average household income is slightly higher when compared to Anoka County but lower when compared to Lino Lakes and North Oaks. ........................................... . ......................................... Centerville 88,036 107,040 Circle Pines 70,398 80,841 Chapter 1 Page 15 50 Centerville 2040 Hugo 82,880 102,356 Lino Lakes 102,904 112,143 North Oaks 151,397 214,069 Anoka County 70,873 84,709 Table 8. Source: 2015 ACS 5-Year Estimates Centerville households have a wide range of annual incomes. Approximately 65 percent of households make between $50,000 and $150,000. About 21 percent of households make less than $50,000 while 15 percent of households make more than $150,000 (see TABLE 9). Centerville Household Income Distribution $200,000 or more $150,000 to$199,999 ro$100,000 to$149,999 $75,000 to$99,999 E 0 $50,000 to$74,999 $35,000 to$49,999 ............... 0 $25,000 to$34,999 0 $15,000 to$24,999 $10,000 to$14,999 Less than$10,000 0.00% 5.00% 10.00% 15.00% 20.00% 25.00% 30.00% Percent (%) of all Households Table 9. Source: 2015 ACS 5-Year Estimates In 2016 there were approximately 1,351 housing units within the City of Centerville, made up of a variety of different single and multifamily units. Housing is the dominant land use in Centerville, making up 42 percent of the area of the city. Housing Unit Types Single family detached is by far the most dominant type of housing unit within the Centerville and requires the most land per household. With Centerville not fully developed, it is likely that new housing units will continue in this low- density trend. Chapter 1 Page 16 51 Centerville 2040 . x, Single-Family Detached 1,116 82.2% Townhomes (single-family attached) 119 8.8% Manufactured Home 0 0.00/0 Duplex and triplex and quad 14 1.00/0 Multifamily (5 units or more) 108 8.0% 2016 Total 1,357 Table 10. Source: Metropolitan Council Housing Stock Estimates Maintaining a quality housing stock is essential to a healthy Centerville. As an emerging suburb, Centerville is seeing new housing constructed. Almost 90 percent of the housing units in Centerville were built after 1980. While still relatively new, these units will continue to age and need to be maintained. Age of Housing Units Built 1939 or earlier Built 1940 to 1949 Built 1950 to 1959 m Built 1960 to 1969 Built 1970 to 1979 i Built 1980 to 1989 .. ................................................ L Built 1990 to 1999 ro Built 2000 to 2009 Built 2010 to 2013 Built 2014 or later 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45% Percentage of Total Housing Units Table 11. Source: 2015 ACS 5-Year Estimates An estimated 92.5 percent of Centerville's housing units are owner-occupied, with just 7.5 percent being renter occupied. This provides the City with a stable housing base. Chapter 1 Page 17 52 Centerville 2040 Housing Units by Tenure 1,400 65 1,200 93 41 1,000 Vacant 800 Renter-occupied 600 0 Owner-occupied 400 200 0 Table 12. Data Source: ACS 2015 Estimates Building Permits Permit data can give an accurate reflection of the amount and type of growth occurring in a community.Table 13 shows the valuation ofthe building permits issued by type since 2010. In that timeframe, the City has not issued any commercial building permits. Building Permit - Residential and Commercial $3,500,000 $3,000,000 $2,500,000 $2,000,000 $1,500,000 $1,000,000 $500,000 $0 ... ... 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Residential Commercial Table 13. Data Source: City of Centerville Chapter 1 Page 18 53 Centerville 2040 . x, Existing Land Use Existing land use can be thought of as what actually exists on the ground at the present time, regardless what has been planned or what zoning regulations exist. MAP 1-3 shows the generalized land use in the City of Centerville Chapter 1 Page 19 54 8 � c�ecm�c� WEA um - •�Em ® �� CD � N o Q) "lo° e — ��--------------------I g 96 o ----------- W, —rc a � �� �N3.•L"LJ� I'' -------------- wa � --— — w � O f (sw �w w LO w ° •' � m s 8 w. LO lw w �z� gw a 'A�o — --------------------------------I- w l Na Jw. w I � wQ � V_ •y J J N N OQ Q d C Ti N N o z< m i I U � I Q i I ---------- --' z o o - - E E ° - - o� m w m m m Centerville 2040 The most accurate depiction of what land uses currently exist in Centerville comes from the City's own geographic data to provide current land use types by acreage. Existing land use types, total acreage and percent of total acreage are shown in the table below. As an emerging suburb community, there is still land in the City that remains undeveloped. Land Use Type Acres Percent Agriculture 143 9% Extractive 13 1% Farmstead 3 <1% Industrial and Utility 44 3% Institutional 42 3% Mixed Use Residential 1 <1% Multifamily 6 <1% Office 2 <1% Open Water 195 13% Park, Recreational or Preserve 188 12% Retail and Other Commercial 28 2% Single Family Attached 23 1% Single Family Detached 645 41% Undeveloped Land 227 15% Total 1,560 Table 14. Source: Metropolitan Council 2016 Generalized Land Use Chapter 1 Page 21 56 Centerville 2040 Existing Residential Land Use Residential land uses make up 42 percent of Centerville's total land area. Of the residential land, single family detached homes are the predominant residential type at 95.6 percent of the total area devoted to residential uses. Existing Residential Land Uses (by total area) 0.1 3.4% 0.9% Mixed Use Residential Multifamily Single Family Detached Single Family Attached 95.6% Table 15. Source: Metropolitan Council 2016 Generalized Land Use Existing Commercial and Industrial Land Use Centerville has commercial and industrial areas, and together they make up 5% of Centerville's land area. The majority of Centerville's industrial land is in the eastern portion of the city. The City's commercial areas lie along 20th Ave South and Main Street. Centerville is still home to agricultural land use. Agricultural areas make up 9 percent of Centerville's land area, and exist in the southern and eastern portions of the city. Existing Public Land Uses Six percent of Centerville's land area is made up of institutional and utility land uses. These include civic buildings and city-owned land. An additional 12 percent of Centerville is devoted to outdoor recreation or sport areas and open spaces that include par Chapter 1 Page 22 57 s � 'Vii:+ 9•+ J=' t� ;, i; �J ��''' _ „fi 'ehensive imeline p Community Atiractors e and Detractors - ` �i Centerville 2040 . CHAPTER 2: GOALS AND POLICIES Goals and policies are official statements which provide the basis for growth management strategies. Goals identify the various objectives the City has identified in managing future growth and protecting natural resources. Policies represent the official position of the City with respect to implementation of growth management goals. The growth management plan and official controls are based upon the goals and policies adopted by the City. a.: V. xv t ; ; . M, Vt It is the overall goal of the City of Centerville to promote economic development that provides housing diversity and employment opportunities while managing future growth in a manner consistent with the nature of the community. The City will balance development with the health, safety and welfare of the public; natural resource protection and the ability to provide adequate public services. It is the goal of the City of Centerville to: • Create a logical and orderly transition from agricultural to non-agricultural land uses. • Establish a future land use plan that contains compatible land use patterns. • Establish land use patterns which protect natural amenities and avoid environmental constraints. • Establish phased growth areas which reflect City priorities for development staging and contiguous, planned extensions of public infrastructure. • Utilize the City's design guidelines for development within the Mixed Use/Central Business District. • Enhance the character of individual neighborhoods and the sense of overall community identity. • Expand the commercial/industrial tax base and employment opportunities in the City. It is the policy of the City of Centerville to: Chapter 2 1 Page 1 59 Centerville 2040 . • Identify a long range land use plan which incorporates community goals. • Establish roadway and trail corridors which link neighborhoods, parks, business centers and other community facilities together as well as amenities in adjacent communities. • Identify land which is suitable for commercial development and is accessible to existing and planned roadways and compatible with existing and planned land uses. • Limit development to areas identified with utility capability or staged according to growth sequencing plans. • Prohibit residential development with private utilities in areas included in the long range public utility service area. • Require all subdivisions to adhere to long range plans for thoroughfares, trails, parks and utility corridors to ensure continuity of development patterns and implementation of community priorities. f t �7. It is the goal of the City of Centerville to: • Provide a housing mixture that will allow for low, middle, and high income families which does not discriminate against persons seeking housing based on age, religion, race, ethnic origin, sexual preference, gender, or disability. • Provide for the orderly development of safe and efficient housing opportunities in the City. • Maintain a level of growth compatible with the available level of public services. • Provide non-motorized access to commercial properties and park amenities within the city and surrounding areas. • Promote and emphasize the small town atmosphere of the City. • Plan densities and provide services for a sustainable population in excess of 5,000 people at full build-out. • Increase housing densities to reach the population goal. • Connect the various neighborhoods of the city with trails and sidewalks. It is the policy of the City of Centerville to: • Encourage the revitalization of the existing housing stock in the City as a source of affordable housing which does not discriminate against persons seeking housing based on age, religion, race, ethnic origin, sexual preference, gender, or disability. • Avoid adoption of regulations which create excessive obstacles to the development of affordable housing. Chapter 2 1 Page 2 60 Centerville 2040 . • Protect residential neighborhoods from incompatible and offensive uses. • Identify areas appropriate for multiple family and senior housing opportunities. • Allow residential lot divisions only when adequate utilities are immediately available and are consistent with public utility sequencing. • Prohibit residential development without public utilities. • Require the installation of sidewalks on at least one side of the street in new neighborhoods where suggested by the City Engineer. • Explore opportunities to install sidewalks in existing neighborhoods that lack them. • Maintain standards for landscaping and screening to ensure adequate aesthetic controls. • Maintain adequate standards for site access, parking, and structure setbacks. • Enforce standards for structure upkeep and site maintenance to ensure long-term aesthetic controls. • Revisit all established standards as appropriate. It is the goal of the City of Centerville to: • Provide for a variety of employment and development opportunities in the City. • Expand employment and tax base in the City. • Maintain and improve the City's downtown Central Business District according to the downtown development guidelines. • Utilize the Main Street corridor for additional commercial uses in Centerville. • Expand and diversify the city's tax base by encouraging new commercial retail development. It is the policy of the City of Centerville to: • Require that all commercial uses utilize public utility systems. • Create a cohesive identity for all commercial areas with design guidelines for buildings, signage, and streetscaping. • Provide adequate lot sizes and minimum buildable areas for business uses to provide for convenient and safe access, adequate parking, site buffering and landscaping. • Avoid incompatibilities between commercial uses and residential uses. • Develop sign regulations that regulate size, height, placement, materials and composition to ensure signs do not detract from the small town-feel Chapter 2 1 Page 3 61 Centerville 2040 . and natural beauty of the City. In general free-standing, large or internally lit signs should be prohibited. • Evaluate TIF, CDBG and other funding options to provide assistance for CBD redevelopment. • Develop retail uses in a clustered or shopping center concept as a preferred alternative to strip malls or scattered development. • Connect shopping areas to each other and to residential areas with sidewalks and pedestrian byways and bicycle trails. • Establish commercial land uses in proximity to commercial development of adjacent communities to maximize the benefit for businesses within Centerville. • Maintain standards for landscaping and screening to ensure adequate aesthetic controls. • Maintain adequate standards for buildings and signage design, site access, parking, maneuvering, loading, and structure setbacks. • Enforce standards for structure upkeep and site maintenance to ensure long-term aesthetic controls. • Revisit all established standards as appropriate. It is the goal of the City of Centerville to: • Support the development of a mixed-use downtown consistent with the goals laid out in the Master Plan. • Use the mixed-use designation to promote well-designed, pedestrian- oriented development that enhances the quality of life for City residents and promotes a "traditional neighborhood" or small town atmosphere. • Review the downtown development plan and guidelines. It is the policy of the City of Centerville to: • Require that all development in the area identified as the downtown follow the goals, policies and guidelines of the Downtown Master Plan. • Utilize City regulatory and economic development tools to encourage commercial and residential development within the downtown area that is consistent with the vision of the Master Plan. • Require that all development within areas guided for mixed-use have sidewalks on both sides of every street. • Utilize design guidelines for mixed-use areas to: Chapter 2 1 Page 4 62 Centerville 2040 . o Minimize the impact of automobiles through strategies such a shared parking, in which adjacent land uses having different peak-hour parking demands can share parking facilities o Achieve "traffic calming" benefits through: an integrated street network, provision of options for traffic flow, the design of streets with adequate width, and the provision of on-street parking o Provide for public open space that uses storm water treatment ponds as a visual and recreational amenity to the project o Ensure the compatibility of buildings with respect to the specific character of their immediate context o Encourage active ground floor uses, such as restaurants, shops and services, to animate the street within mixed-use areas It is the goal of the City of Centerville to: • Expand the non-residential tax base. • Encourage clean and attractive industrial uses in the community. It is the policy of the City of Centerville to: • Focus on investments and development potential in the existing industrial park before establishing new industrial development areas. • Evaluate land availability and utility feasibility for long range expansion of the existing industrial park. • Evaluate TIF feasibility to expand transportation access and trunk utility networks to support existing and future industrial potential. • Establish uniform design standards to promote continuity between individual industrial uses and compatibility with non-industrial uses. • Maintain standards for landscaping and screening to ensure adequate aesthetic controls. • Maintain adequate standards for buildings and signage design, site access, parking, maneuvering, loading, and structure setbacks. • Enforce standards for structure upkeep and site maintenance to ensure long-term aesthetic controls. • Revisit all established standards as appropriate. Chapter 2 1 Page 5 63 Centerville 2040 . i It is the goal of the City of Centerville to: • Maintain a safe, efficient and convenient multi-modal transportation system. • Protect the integrity of the transportation system. • Provide sufficient off-street parking. It is the policy of the City of Centerville to: • Develop land use development standards that promote safe and efficient access to the transportation system. • Develop land uses and access spacing guidelines compatible with the functional classification of the regional highway system. • Establish a local transportation network which preserves neighborhood identity while linking together neighborhoods, community parks and facilities. • Identify long term transportation corridors to provide access to and within the City as development occurs. • Identify potential trail corridors for long term linkage to neighborhoods, public parks and businesses and construct those trails as funding allows. • Coordinate transportation planning and system improvements with surrounding communities as well as Anoka County and the Minnesota Department of Transportation. • Work with the Metro Transit to maximize transit opportunities for the community. It is the goal of the City of Centerville to: • Provide convenient active and passive recreation opportunities that serve all the residents of Centerville. • Build new and upgrade existing park properties and trails with ecologically sound and sustainable materials, where possible. • Establish a biking/hiking trail system connecting the City parks and residential neighborhoods. • Provide adequate expansion of parks and recreation areas in proposed residential developments. • Provide safe and convenient bicycle and pedestrian access to community recreational facilities. Chapter 2 1 Page 6 64 Centerville 2040 . • Utilize and preserve parks and recreation opportunities on the shores of Centerville and Peltier Lakes with appropriate sustainable practices in mind. • Promote or provide recreational facilities and programs to serve the varied recreational needs of all age groups in the City. It is the policy of the City of Centerville to: • Develop a trail access plan which provides interconnection of major parks, recreation areas, schools, commercial nodes, the Central Business District as well as existing and future community neighborhoods and implement the plan as funding opportunities allow. • Design and maintain parks with proper lighting, shelter and landscaping to ensure public and property safety, with sustainable practices which protect environmental resources for future generations. • Develop land use regulations compatible with adjacent parks, recreation areas and natural features. • Require dedication of net developable parkland or cash in lieu of land in conjunction with the subdivision or re-development of all properties. • Encourage and accept land gifts and forfeitures in areas with potential recreational development opportunities or to provide open green-space. • Coordinate regional trail development potential with Anoka County and adjacent communities. It is the goal of the City of Centerville to: • Coordinate with partner organizations to protect Centerville Lake, Peltier Lake, and Clearwater Creek for future generations to enjoy. • Promote and implement sustainable practices through education, by example and use of eco-friendly products on public lands. • Protect environmental systems from unnecessary impacts of future growth and development activities. • Protect the surface waters, ground waters and wetland areas of the City to promote aesthetic qualities, natural habitat areas, ground water recharge and recreation opportunities. • Protect ground water purity by preventing erosion and improper discharge of sedimentation into ours local lakes and streams. • Maintain the valuable open space of the community. It is the policy of the City of Centerville to: Chapter 2 1 Page 7 65 Centerville 2040 . • Carefully manage any development affecting floodplains, steep slopes, wetlands, and other environmentally sensitive areas. • Adopt and enforce wetland alteration and mitigation requirements consistent with the Wetlands Conservation Act**. • Enforce erosion and sedimentation control standards consistent with MPCA's ''best management practices.'' • Require that stormwater ponds meet the design standards of the National Urban Runoff Program (NURP) • Enforce shoreland management regulations along Centerville Lake, Peltier Lake, Clearwater Creek and County Ditch No. 47. • Establish landscaping requirements for all new residential and commercial developments that address the management of surface water run-off and other harmful side effects. • Give preference in surface water management systems design to surface drainage, vegetation, and infiltration rather than buried pipes and man- made materials and facilities. • Enforce local water plan regulations consistent with the Rice Creek Watershed District (RCWD) Plan and the RCWD Rules. • Implement the City's Surface Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) and Surface Water Management Plan. • Coordinate with the Rice Creek Watershed District(RCWD) and Department of Natural Resources (DNR) to identify impaired waterbodies and secure grant funding to improve those impaired waterbodies. VV It is the goal of the City of Centerville to: • Promote safe neighborhoods and low crime in the community. • Maintain and improve the quality of life in the community. • Provide efficient and responsive services to residents and businesses. • Maintain the quality of education available to residents. • Protect Surface Water resources within and downstream from the City of Centerville. It is the policy of the City of Centerville to: • Compare the level of administrative, maintenance and emergency response services to community wide needs and objectives. • Explore potential joint service initiatives through continued communication and cooperation with City, County and School officials. Chapter 2 1 Page 8 66 Centerville 2040 . • Promote effective communication with residents, business owners, educators and volunteer organizations to maintain an understanding of community goals and objectives and participate in community affairs. • Periodically evaluate the level of public services provided and the associated costs of services. • Design public utility systems for optimum development or saturation in the community and establish cost effective staging or sequencing of utility systems. • Establish priority for basic services to ensure the highest levels of safety and accessibility are provided in the community. • Expand efforts for effective communication and cooperation with surrounding cities on area growth Issues and common concerns. • Require that development proposals are consistent with planned extensions of public utilities and incorporate necessary extensions of core facilities. • Require that the installation of all public infrastructure is designed and constructed according to City standards and specifications. • Enforce ordinance provisions which require connection of existing homes and businesses with private utilities to public utility systems, within a reasonable time after public utilities have become available. • Establish design and construction standards for sanitary sewer installation and maintenance to minimize potential sources of inflow/infiltration in the sewer collection system. • Continue monitoring potential sources of inflow/infiltration to reduce inefficiencies in the metropolitan wastewater treatment system. • Continue to implement conservation programs aimed at reducing residential water use. Chapter 2 1 Page 9 67 eiN a ter Land L _ Centerville 2040 H CHAPTER I LAND USE The Land Use Chapter identifies the specific land use categories and strategies for future growth and redevelopment in Centerville. The land use categories are the framework upon which the official controls, such as the zoning ordinance and subdivision regulations, are based. The plan elements contain the regulatory concepts for residential growth, commercial and industrial development and environmental protection.The plan elements and land use planning decisions are based on Goals and Policies developed during the Comprehensive Plan update process. It is the goal of the City of Centerville to: • Create a logical and orderly transition from agricultural to non-agricultural land uses. • Establish a future land use plan that contains compatible land use patterns. • Establish land use patterns which protect natural amenities and avoid environmental constraints. • Establish phased growth areas which reflect City priorities for development staging and contiguous, planned extensions of public infrastructure. • Utilize the City's design guidelines for development within the Mixed Use/Central Business District. • Enhance the character of individual neighborhoods and the sense of overall community identity. • Expand the commercial/industrial tax base and employment opportunities in the City. Policies reflect the position of the City on the specific implementation of the Goals. It is the policy of the City of Centerville to: • Identify a long range land use plan which incorporates community goals. • Establish roadway and trail corridors which link neighborhoods, parks, business centers and other community facilities together as well as amenities in adjacent communities. • Identify land which is suitable for commercial development and is accessible to existing and planned roadways and compatible with existing and planned land uses. • Limit development to areas identified with utility capability or staged according to growth sequencing plans. • Prohibit residential development with private utilities in areas included in the long range public utility service area. • Require all subdivisions to adhere to long range plans for thoroughfares, trails, parks and utility corridors to ensure continuity of development patterns and implementation of community priorities. Chapter 3 1 Page 1 69 Centerville 2040 Centerville is currently over 85% developed and within the 2040 planning cycle will likely approach or reach full build out. The focus of the 2040 Comprehensive Plan is to focus on the appropriate land uses for the small amount of remaining vacant land, and some emerging opportunities for redevelopment. It is estimated there are a combined 370 acres of land identified in the existing land use as vacant or agricultural land in Centerville. The City is currently entirely within the Metropolitan Urban Service Area (MUSA). Future development in Centerville will be limited to a few key areas of the City. These areas were the focus of the Planning Commission and City Council during the plan update process. These areas included: commercial and industrial land near the City's eastern border, agricultural and vacant land near the northern and southern borders, and redevelopment areas near the downtown and the lakes. Map 1-3 shows the actual use of the land in Centerville today, regardless of planned land use. This map identifies vacant land, and provides a basis for future planning. Table 16 below shows existing land use acres in Centerville based on the 2030 Future Land Use Map. Gross AcresPercentage Low Density Residential 615 39.4% Medium Density Residential 105 6.7% High Density Residential 47 3.0% CBD/Mixed Use 27 1.7% Commercial 99 6.3% Industrial 79 5.10/0 Public/Semi-Public 48 3.1% City Park 36 2.3% Regional Park 144 9.2% Right of Way 164 10.6% Water 196 12.6% Total 1,560 1000/0 Chapter 3 Page 2 70 Centerville 2040 �N Map 3-1 shows the areas of change that were the focus of the plan update. Alternative land use scenarios were developed for these areas during the planning process, with the existing 2030 comprehensive plan land use designations for those parcels shown in Map 3-1. A breakdown of the 2030 land use designations for the five focus areas and the proposed land use designation changes are shown below in Table 17. The agreed upon 2040 Future Land Use Designations are shown in Map 3-2, 2040 Future Land Use. Area. Acreage 2030 2040 ...... .......... ...................................................................... A 6.7 Public/Semi-Public Low .............................. Density Residential ......................................... .... ... B 0.9 Commercial Public/Semi-Public C 7.2 High Density Residential Medium Density & Commercial Residential D 1.7 Low Density Residential CBD/Mixed Use E 6.7 Low Density Residential CBD/Mixed Use Chapter 3 Page 3 71 c �o W mQ 3Sf 31tl1Sa31N1 �¢SAPSE35E ASH/b� n __- Jb' MAW ST TO NB�t'� ��S£ OTTER LAKE SERVICE RO da 3Ntll a3110 1S NryA,O �1b1Sa31Nl 9N �N 1� 3S£31tl15a31N19S O11S NItlW iM Sf� 1y�S ba'1NI 9S u�5 y 21 SSP y a ® z z 3Ab HlOZ DEER Pa 3AtlrAlIND ro m 'y'� - n n K Y I lyylry LAKESAVE .- " 0 4�� ,:vt' ._� fly WAY COTTORWOO m �O Nb/ - O� 10 0tlWD5 am m e X 3Atl DtlHS � 1'DYMI � p w HODLE y a - w �8` agAltlo rc OLD MILL RD i Da IIIW - lf �- /`� z MALLARD WAY Y'Idr0a 553NDti ild m� � KJ a_ w � _.•.� p'L� y v OH�N�IOD �a�k N J _.--._.o Dai�lAN3''1N30 :v R - Vi rc r o Y q. B EAVER PDNOW 38.0 Y' ell Adlmmkk N Nb y I u.. k w I oJ2 �`d �flI r ❑ CREEK pq ��dd V{REP O CLEAR P 39E 31tl1SM31Nl Rg'(ASti '/Sry/yam n �O J MAIN 1SN V�.�NlE O,/�S£�1b1SM31Nl eN TTER LAKE SERVICE RO p� �Sf 35E 31tl15M31N1 SS O11S NItlW M �S��1NI SS �5 zisT PJ m 3Atl 15 LZ w V1 Q' 4 4 U a V t K r s ❑ �qq N Y � rc ❑ N�� 3Ay N10Z_. N V Y pEERPa 3Atl.A11Nf1 ro m "�" �' ' O O K Y C TNIN LAKES AVE Mo :. . 4� �� i1 COTTONW 00� � _ ll0 Nb/ f'J'/WAV O-C lOgtlW DS m K 3Atl DtlHS 1�MI O = / y NOSM313d W > O w ❑ U Oi W �j MIO]Id0 OLD MILL OM.IIIW PHEASANT ER j CV 8/C 'C � MALL•ARD WAY 1 uy � Ob O 4NrDi15532190Md ~ ,W ""• C '�� - - � - ❑f�0M13.11IAii3'1N3D � Za 3 -ati N d0 X109 J W Nl'3DDId, Y 1� W I�� BEAVER POND`WAY r- .a F xis Y t ?} Y O O s. Wk ❑ '.O GpEEXDR G �gP w ��6� CLEAR`N 3SE 31tl1SM31NI MgIN Si 70 NB�NTtiR5SP�35E ASN/b�0 a 'CSO _ N�bh' OTTER LAKE SERVICE RD 1S ��S£�111SM31NI eN �� 3SE 31tl1SM31N19S 0115 NItlW -M Sea Q61 S��1N1 8S Py�s m 21 SS y Q w � � z v � W DEER P THIN SAKES AVE G SFW WAV COTTONWOOD 0 �O Nb/ K OA. 10 OtlWnS 5 d0 m 2 F 1' 3Atl OtlHS J//® 4 z � �j 1 o PHEASANT L•N ? w pF �� P' g ENDOW CT �RG m CV0 9iC0 M z WPY Me,MAL-ARD OM SS 3M9om, r w Oi13llIAM3'1N3O'"'- p N 901 2a •:3K� OM NOi�IOD �� � Nl 3 d' D s 5 W BEAVERiPOND ob�b � a II 'l9 AaN.m; F` JND;G3 y K e1 i p 4 Y Centerville 2040 N The 2040 Future Land Use Plan (Map 3-2) identifies the land use designations for development in the City. Most of the remaining gross vacant land will be dedicated to residential development.The downtown area will include a mixture of residential uses and retail or office uses with the southern portion of Main Street focused on redevelopment to commercial uses as market demand allows. Table 18 shows the acres corresponding to the Future Land Use Plan. 2040 Future Land Use Gross Acres Percentage Low Density Residential 613.3 39.3% Medium Density Residential 112.2 7.2% High Density Residential 40.1 2.6% CBD/Mixed Use 35.0 23% Commercial 98.1 6.1% Industrial 78.8 5.10/0 ........................................................................ Public/Semi-Public 42.2 2.7% City Park 36.3 2.3% Regional Park 144.0 9.2% Right of Way 164.0 10.6% Water 196.0 12.6% Chapter 3 Page 7 75 Centerville 2040 N The Metropolitan Council requires a calculation of the net density of areas of planned residential development for areas identified for development or redevelopment. They require a minimum density of three units per net developable acre for communities with the "Emerging Suburban Edge" community designation. Table 19 shows net density in these areas and Map 3-3 identifies those areas. Wetlands, floodplain and right of way were all subtracted from each of the areas to arrive at a net acreage. Using the preferred land use guiding and density midpoints, the number of potential new units for the change areas was calculated. It is estimated that at a minimum, an additional 412 new units could be added to Centerville upon full build out of these areas based on the allowed density ranges. Future Land Use Net Density Range Yield 1/o Units Designation Acres Min Mid Max Minimum Midpoint Low Density 24.50 3 4 5 1000/0 74 98 Residential Medium Density 66.89 3 9 15 1000/0 201 602 Residential High Density 8.06 12 18.5 25 100% 97 149 Residential Central Business 13.75 12 21 30 25% 41 72 District (CBD) (3.43 Mixed Use Res) Total 102.8 413 921 1000/0 Net Density 4.02 8.96 Chapter 3 1 Page 8 76 Centerville 2040 N Table 20 below shows the anticipated timing of growth in population and households based on potential new units projected by the Metropolitan Council. As all remaining developable areas are within the MUSA a multi-year staging plan is not necessary. Anticipated forecasts for growth are illustrated in Table 20 to help gauge projected timing. Development and redevelopment in the City will be dictated based on market conditions in the region. Economic conditions and other factors may stall the pace of development, as well. It is not intended that the anticipated growth represented in Table 20 be strictly applied. If the pace of development becomes accelerated, the City will coordinate with the Metropolitan Council. ................................................. ............ ........................................... Population 2010 2020 2030 2040 Change 2010—2040 Sewered 3,358 3,410 3,520 3,640 282 Unsewered 434 430 410 420 -14 Total Households .......................................................................................................... Sewered 1,161 1,250 1,3001,350 189 ............ ........................................... Unsewered 154 150 150 150 -4 Employment Sewered 403 530 550 580 177 Unsewered 6 10 10 10 4 In 2016, household size in Centerville was estimated at 2.92 persons per household which is very close to the 2010 household size of 2.88 and 2000 household size of 2.97. In that same time Anoka County has seen steady reduction in persons per household. In 2000 the household size was 2.77 persons. In 2010 the estimate was 2.70 and in 2016 the estimate was 2.69. Anoka County and the metropolitan region are expected to see a continued decline in household size. V: f V! The City is completely within the Metropolitan Urban Service Area (MUSA) and as a result expansion of the MUSA is not necessary as it relates to staged development. Map 4-3 outlines the City's staged development plan for development and redevelopment. The timelines depicted in Map 4-3 are for planning purposes only and market demands may result in parcels developing earlier or later than currently anticipated. Acreages of developed or redeveloped land in the identified planning periods are shown in Table 21 below. Chapter 3 1 Page 9 77 Centerville 2040 Please refer to the City's local sewer plan for anticipated sewer flow based on anticipated development phasing as well as potential impacts on local infrastructure for each 10-year planning increment. .............................. ................................................................................................. Future Land Net Expected Density,Range Yield /o Number of Units Based' UseAcres Residential on Midpoint Density Designation Development 2018 - 2030 - MinMid Max 2018— 2030 - 2030 2040 2030 2040 Low Density 24.50 24.50 0 3 4 5 100% 98 0 Residential Medium 66.89 7.24 59.65 3 9 15 100% 65 537 Density Residential High Density 8.06 0 8.06 12 18.5 25 100% 0 149 Residential Central 13.75 7.54 6.21 12 21 30 25% 39 33 Business (3.43 (1.89 (1.55 District (CBD) Res) Res) Res) / Mixed Use Total (Res) 102.88 33.63 69.26 202 719 (Res) (Res) (Res) 100% 32.7% 67.3% Net Density 6.01 10.38 Chapter 3 1 Page 10 78 Fyc ox E w bd N 3Sf 31tl1SS31N1 �RSTPjE 35E fSN/b{y n �'�O M MgIN ST TO NB SSE OTTER LAKE SERVICE RD 1SN/bW0 31b1Stl31NI BN W 1�S,f 35E 31tl1SN31NJ 950115 Nil N M �s �a'1N1 9S JAB 215 P j]py,3,Atl 15 LZ N 1 � Z IN SAKES AVE P A 4.{ a "Y �HI, 0 �1PNiWAV COT�TONWO0O•. i rp y; � ee 1 r O �>,�� NOSN313d OLD MILL RD, i ON•IIIW P - � y,A�PGj m CVEP I �/C0 M g �,. AY ,ya p MALLARD`r'1 �Y55 0 �c N Z � iN-- ON�3D91AS31N30 S Y VER,P W 14 0 u CD a# p O� p MD�NDc,. w" a' Y` - �" 3 Z I Centerville 2040 N I. Iv The Future Land Use Plan identifies several categories to guide development and redevelopment in the City. These generally include residential uses, commercial uses, industrial uses, public and park uses, and undevelopable land such as right of way and open water. The following are descriptions of these categories. Residential Uses A primary concern for the City regarding residential uses is to protect and enhance the existing housing stock and to allow new residential developments that contain low, medium and high density housing as appropriate. The residential areas currently served by utilities consist primarily of low density single family detached housing. Existing available land for residential development is either contiguous with areas presently served by public utilities, or is within areas guided for redevelopment such as the Downtown Area. It is assumed that public utilities will be extended to new residential development as appropriate and in a contiguous manner. The Future Land Use Plan (Map 3-2) includes four land use categories for residential uses: low, medium, high density residential, and central business district/mixed use. These land use categories are described below. Low Density Residential: These areas are composed of detached, single-family homes. The density will be a minimum of 3 units per acre and a maximum of 5 units per acre without considering wetlands, right of way and other undevelopable land. Medium Density Residential: These areas are composed of a mixture of detached and attached single-family units. The density will range from a minimum of 3 units per acre to 15 units per acre. When developments take place through PUD or over larger land areas, higher density portions should be concentrated near major transportation corridors or neighboring areas of high-density development. High Density Residential: These areas are composed of primarily attached units in multi- story structures. The density will be a minimum of 12 units per acre and a maximum of 25 units per acre. Central Business District/Mixed-Use: These areas are composed of both residential and commercial uses, either in a horizontal or vertical mixture. The density will be a minimum of 12 units per acre and a maximum of 30 units per acre with an anticipated minimum of 25% comprised of housing. The remaining 75% shall be a variety of commercial and office Chapter 3 1 Page 12 80 Centerville 2040 H space. These areas provide buildings that are close to the street, with a focus on providing a pedestrian-friendly environment. The Downtown Master Plan contains detailed plans and design guidelines for these areas. The areas proposed for residential growth during the planning period include medium density development in the southern portion of the City on what is currently some of the last remaining agricultural land, low density development east of Mill Road and north of Revoir Street, and high density and mixed-use development at various locations in the City including the downtown redevelopment area. Commercial Uses The Future Land Use Plan identifies appropriate locations for commercial uses and future development opportunities. There is one land use category for commercial development (other than the CBD/Mixed Use category previously described). The City will encourage clustering of commercial development, as opposed to strip developments, to minimize highway access concerns, to strengthen the viability and marketability of co-located services, and to minimize the impacts on the natural environment of the City. The existing commercial areas will continue to develop in the City,with continued expansion of the current commercial area west of CSAH 21 and County Road 54, north and south of Main Street. The downtown area will also be a priority in terms of retaining its vitality and importance as a focal point in the community. The City will continue to implement the mixed-use concept developed in the Downtown Development Guidelines, including restaurants, service uses and multifamily and senior housing. The City will also evaluate the potential use of tax increment financing and other public assistance programs to assist in implementing redevelopment opportunities. Development standards will be established for new businesses and renovations. Adequate lot sizes and structure setbacks will be required to provide safe and convenient access and parking. Site buffering and landscaping criteria will also be required, as well as revisions to the City's sign standards to provide for the installation of more attractive and consistent signage throughout the City. Industrial Uses The Future Land Use Plan also identifies appropriate locations for industrial uses and future industrial development opportunities in the City. There is one land use category for industrial development. Industrial development will be in the eastern part of the City, east of County Road 54 and south of CSAH 14. There are several existing businesses in the industrial park, primarily related to manufacturing, building contracting, and transportation. Chapter 3 1 Page 13 81 Centerville 2040 H Centerville has an active Economic Development Commission which has completed the Star City program. The Commission will examine the feasibility of establishing community participation and financial incentives for economic development, such as tax increment financing. Proximity to 1-35E, land availability, public utilities and expanding labor markets enhance the opportunities for development potential in the next 10-20 years. Financial assistance, active marketing, and general development may be a prerequisite for maximum opportunities. The City currently has provisions within the existing zoning ordinance related to industrial uses. These provisions will be reviewed to determine if changes are needed to more effectively manage industrial development activities in the future. Adequate lot sizes and structure setbacks will be required to provide safe and convenient access and parking. Site buffering, landscaping and design criteria will also be evaluated. The Metropolitan Council considers any housing development more than eight units per acre to qualify as affordable housing. Based on ThriveMSP 2040 allocations, Centerville has a total affordable housing allocation of 14 units. Table 22 identifies the area median income (AMI) distribution of that affordable housing allocation. The high density residential and central business district/mixed use districts have a minimum density of twelve units per acre which qualify as affordable housing as they exceed the eight units per acre minimum. Based on the City's development phasing plan (Map 4-3) it is anticipated that 7.54 acres of CBD/Mixed use land will develop by 2030. Land guided CBD/Mixed Use are required to develop with a minimum 25% residential. Based on that residential percentage, of the 7.54 acres of developed CBD/Mixed Use land, 1.89 acres will be residential development. That will result in a midpoint of 39 affordable housing units constructed by 2030 which exceeds the City's 2030 affordable housing allocation of 14 units. Affordable Units by 2030 At or below 30% AMI 9 31 — 50% AMI 4 51 —80% AMI 1 Total 14 Chapter 3 Page 14 82 Centerville 2040 Beginning in the summer of 2005, and approved by the City Council in January of 2006, the master plan includes a set of design guidelines and zoning amendments. The Downtown Area Master Plan & Development Guidelines propose recommendations that reinforce and guide public/private investment in a manner that will strengthen the viability of the area. While the Master Plan may no longer be economically feasible, the form and character of development within downtown will be required to adhere to the development guidelines. The purpose of the Master Plan & Development Guidelines was to establish an appropriate framework for future redevelopment of downtown as a vibrant Mixed-Use destination, to incorporate: • An overall vision for redevelopment of the area, including the pattern, form and character of new development and open space in the interest of creating a cohesive mixed-use downtown area. • A framework of transportation improvements needed to support the redevelopment of the area and to create appropriate levels of parking as well as vehicular, bicycle and pedestrian access to the downtown. • A set of design standards to guide the architectural quality of new development within the downtown area. The master plan was also coordinated with the plans for the redesign and expansion of County State Aid Highway 14(Main Street). The master plan integrated efforts to calm traffic, provide a safe pedestrian environment and provide guidelines for buildings that respected the pedestrian scale and encouraged walkability. It is anticipated that following the adoption of the 2040 Comprehensive Plan that the City will revisit the Downtown Master Plan to updated it based on market feasibility. While the master plan will evolve the basis of the downtown vision as a mixed use development will remain. ,V: According to the Metropolitan Council, the City had 430 jobs in 2016. According to the MN DEED Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages, most of the major employers in Centerville can be classified as education and health services, leisure and hospitality, construction and trade, or transportation and utility. Innovative Tools & Technologies, Inc, North Metro Millwork, and John Hart, USA are examples of businesses in the City's existing industrial park. Further employment opportunities are anticipated to include manufacturing, service, and office positions. Chapter 3 1 Page 15 83 Centerville 2040 H Forecasting employment involves numerous criteria. The level of retail development may follow the extent of residential activity. The amount of retail development in adjacent communities will also impact the potential in Centerville. Industrial uses vary dramatically in terms of jobs per acre or floor area. The size of the industrial area suggests that larger, employment-intensive industries would be the exception in Centerville. According to the Metropolitan Council local forecast, Employment is estimated to increase from 430 to 590 jobs by the year 2040. This equates to 80 jobs for each ten year growth stage. Currently the City has approximately 48 acres of land guided for commercial and 12 acres of land guided as industrial. Using the current employment figure of 430 jobs as of 2016 within the community we can estimate that Centerville has roughly 7.2 jobs per developed commercial or industrial acre. Between 2020 and 2040, Centerville hopes that the remaining 51 acres of land guided for commercial and 67 acres of vacant land guided industrial will develop consistent with the Future Land Use Plan. This would bring total acres of commercial land to 99 and industrial land to 79. If the future commercial and industrial land develops with a similarjobs per acre, Centerville could have approximately 1,280 jobs upon full build out. As required by state statute, a municipality's comprehensive plan must also include strategies for protection of special resources, including solar access, historic preservation, and aggregate. These strategies are discussed below. Solar Access Minnesota Statutes require an element for the protection and development of access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. The purpose of this legislation is to prevent solar collectors from being shaded by adjacent structures or vegetation and to ensure that development decisions do not preclude the possible future development and use of solar energy systems. To ensure the availability of solar access, the City of Centerville will, whenever possible, protect access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems on principle structures. The City of Centerville will consider solar access in the review of site plans and planning decisions. Aggregate Resources Metropolitan Council requires that metropolitan area communities identify any regionally significant aggregate resources to ensure proper planning for their use. Centerville does not Chapter 3 1 Page 16 84 Centerville 2040 N contain any regionally significant aggregate resources and therefore does not require any special planning. Historic Preservation When an EAW was completed for Centerville's Downtown Redevelopment project, the State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) was contacted to determine if there were any historic sites or resources. The 106 Group also completed a survey of cultural resources for the County Road 14 reconstruction project. While both inquiries returned the same 39 properties that were in SHPO's inventory, it was concluded that none of these properties are eligible for listing on the National Historic Register. Chapter 3 1 Page 17 85 r 1'9i Li OWILC HITV RHI— y ,e s t>b�'�3"_-.. - •- zr •.d2:sF � � Centerville 2040 . CHAPTER 4: HOUSING I°\I .,i As a community nearing full development, Centerville is looking to the remaining large pieces of vacant land as the last remaining sites for future residential subdivisions. Large, contiguous parcels remain only in the southern portions of the community. As a result, the City is taking a careful approach to planning land use and density to ensure adequate amounts of land are guided to meet the City's life-cycle housing needs. Lifecycle housing refers to the mix of housing types that meet the housing demands of individuals and families throughout their lives, such as single family detached, town homes, condominiums, apartments, and senior housing. Centerville has a tremendous opportunity to meet this demand not only through the remaining vacant land but within the downtown redevelopment plan/mixed use area located along County Road 21 and Main Street. Housing goals established by the City through the Comprehensive Plan update included the following: • Provide a housing mixture that will allow for low, middle, and high income families which does not discriminate against persons seeking housing based on age, religion, race, ethnic origin, sexual preference, gender, or disability. • Provide for the orderly development of safe and efficient housing opportunities in the City. • Maintain a level ofgrowth compatible with the available level ofpublic services. • Provide non-motorized access to commercial properties and park amenities within the city and surrounding areas. • Promote and emphasize the small town atmosphere of the City. • Plan densities and provide services for a sustainable population in excess of 5,000 people at full build-out. • Increase housing densities to reach the population goal. Housing policies reflect the position of the City on the specific implementation of the Goals. It is the policy of the City of Centerville to: Chapter 4 1 Pagel 87 Centerville 2040 • Encourage the revitalization of the existing housing stock in the City as a source of affordable housing which does not discriminate against persons seeking housing based on age, religion, race, ethnic origin, sexual preference, gender, or disability. • Avoid adoption of regulations which create excessive obstacles to the development of affordable housing. • Protect residential neighborhoods from incompatible and offensive uses. • Identify areas appropriate for multiple family and senior housing opportunities. • Allow residential lot divisions only when adequate utilities are immediately available and are consistent with public utility sequencing. • Prohibit residential development without public utilities. • Require the installation of sidewalks on at least one side of the street in new neighborhoods where suggested by the City Engineer. • Explore opportunities to install sidewalks in existing neighborhoods that lack them. • Maintain standards for landscaping and screening to ensure adequate aesthetic controls. • Maintain adequate standards for site access,parking, and structure setbacks. • Enforce standards for structure upkeep and site maintenance to ensure long-term aesthetic controls. • Revisit all established standards as appropriate. The Metropolitan Council issues forecasts for population and household growth. In Table 23 below the Household Forecasts are displayed. ........................................................................................................................ Actual Estimate Forecasts 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2016 2020 2030 2040 Centerville 147 214 519 1,077 1,315 1,351 1,400 1,450 1,500 %change x 45.58% 142.52% 107.51% 22.10% 3.20% 3.17% 3.57% 3.45% Anoka 39,668 60,716 82,437 106,428 121,227 128,135 136,860 155,300 171,930 County %change x 53.06% 35.77% 29.10% 13.91% 5.70%.. 6.81% 13.47% 10.71% .................................... ....... ............................................................... Source. 2010 U S Census, *Metropolitan Council forecasts estimates. Chapter 4 1 Page 2 88 Centerville 2040 . Table 23 above shows that there are approximately 1,351 existing housing units in the City according to the Metropolitan Council. In addition to the total amount of units it is important to understand housing tenure and amount of owner and rental occupancy. Data from the 2015 ACS finds that the community has an 87.9% owner-occupied and a 7.10/0 rental occupied housing mix. Each new household added to a city requires an additional housing unit and results in increasing residential land uses. Between 2000 and 2016, Centerville had a slower household growth rate than Anoka County as shown in Table 23 above. The city added 558 households in the 1990s. The Met Council forecast shows that Centerville will be adding an additional 143 households between 2016 and 2040. The City has identified and guided land to meet the Met Council forecasts shown in Table 24. However, the City has identified approximately 102 acres available for development or redevelopment property that when fully developed will surpass the 2040 figures for population and households. The private market will dictate when those lands are actually developed. Population 2010 2020 2030 2040 Change 2010 2040 Sewered 3,358 3,410 3,520 3,640 282 Unsewered 434 430 410 420 -14 Total Households Sewered 1,161 1,250 1,300 1,350 189 Unsewered 154 150 150 150 -4 Employment Sewered 403 530 550 580 177 Unsewered 6 10 10 10 4 The increase in households and ultimately population will be achieved by the development of remaining vacant lands as well as including the approved downtown master plan into the forecasts. Through the comprehensive planning process, areas of future residential development were identified. The density for each residential land use type is as follows: • Low density: 3 - 5 dwelling units/acre • Medium density: 3 - 15 dwelling units/acre • High Density: 12 - 25 dwelling units/acre • Mixed-Use: 12 - 30 dwelling units/acre Chapter 4 1 Page 3 89 Centerville 2040 These land use categories and corresponding densities are included on the Future Land Use Map 3-2.The result of this analysis is displayed on the map and table above.This information was presented to the public and approved by the City Council during the Comprehensive Plan update process. The table demonstrates how the City can achieve a population over 5,000 at full development by changing some land use categories to higher densities and redeveloping the downtown area according to the downtown development guidelines. These changes also help the City meet life-cycle housing goals by providing areas for medium and high- density housing. Building Permits Permit data can give an accurate reflection of the amount and type of growth occurring in a community over a longer time period. The number of permits issued during a particular timeframe is also somewhat independent of land area consumed given different lot sizes and density; therefore, it is useful for tracking growth in housing units, but not necessarily changes in land use. TABLE 25 shows the number of building permits issued by type since 2010. There were no commercial building permits issued between 2010 and 2015. TABLE 25 PERMITS ISSUED BY TYPE Building Permit - Residential and Commercial $3,500,000 $3,000,000 $2,500,000 $2,000,000 $1,500,000 $1,000,000 $500,000 $0 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Residential Commercial The graph shows a steady increase in residential permits issued since the 2010, as the economy recovered from the 2008 recession. The recent leveling off may be attributable to the fact that Centerville is reaching full build-out. Table 26 below, showing estimated value Chapter 4 1 Page 4 90 Centerville 2040 . of permits, shows a similar trend. Permit value increased sharply from 2010 to 2012, and then leveled off in subsequent years. TABLE 26 ESTIMATED VALUE OF PERMITS Building Permit - Residential and Commercial $3,500,000 $3,000,000 $2,500,000 $2,000,000 $1,500,000 $1,000,000 $500,000 $0 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Residential Commercial Household Income Household incomes drives the level of consumer choice for housing and likewise has a considerable effect on local housing demand.The following tables describe the income levels of current households in Centerville. As SHOWN IN TABLE 27, 9 percent of households in Centerville make less than $25,000 a year, 34 percent make between $25,000 and $75,000, and 58 percent make more than $75,000 a year. Income Households Percentage Less than $10,000 6 0.50/0 $10,000 to $14,999 14 1.10/0 $15,000 to $24,999 85 6.5% $25,000 to $34,999 70 5.4% $35,000 to $49,999 124 9.6% $50,000 to $74,999 246 19.00/0 $75,000 to $99,999 211 16.3% $100,000 to $149,999 362 27.9% $150,000 or more 178 13.7% SOURCE:ACS 2012-2016 ESTIMATES Chapter 4 1 Page 5 91 Centerville 2040 As shown in TABLE 28, the median household income in Centerville is $63,696 which is 21.1 percent higher than the Anoka County median and 25.7 percent higher than the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area median. IncomeCenterville Anoka %of Twin Cities %of TC County County ' MSA Median $89,100 $73,600 121.1% $70,900 125.7% income SOURCE: ACS 2012-2016 ESTIMATES The measure of affordability of a housing unit compares housing cost to gross household income. The general standard is that housing is affordable if housing expenses equal 30% or less of a person's gross household income. TABLE 29 shows that 27 percent of households in Centerville that own their home spent more than 30% of their income on housing costs. A similar pattern occurs in rental housing. TABLE 30 shows that 51 percent of households that rent their home spent more than 30% of their income on rent. #>.Units Percent < 20 percent587 48% 20-24 percent_ 194 16% 25-29 percent _ 84 7% 30-34 percent 72 6% 35% or more242 21% Not computed_ 6 0% Total 1,179 100% SOURCE: ACS 2012-2016 ESTIMATES Chapter 4 1 Page 6 92 Centerville 2040 ................................................................................................. # Units Percent < 20 percent 7 6% 20-24 percent 16 14% 25-29 percent 31 28% 30-34 percent 16 14% 35% or more 41 37% Not computed 0 00/0 Total ill 1000/0 SOURCE:ACS 2012-2016 ESTIMATES Senior Housing Centerville currently has one age-restricted housing development. Chauncy Barrett is a senior housing development owned by Anoka County located on Centerville Road south of Heritage Street. The first building in the complex was built in 1998 and consists of 16 units. The second building consists of 31 units and was built in 2004. All units are age-restricted and rental. ......................................................................................................... Chapter 4 1 Page 7 93 o Q u u V V V O g '�'J�Lt7CD ��� (.�ciLGCflE�cP.�GD' ----------------- €m>�ma�m�caa �m • ••• • •, -9 --- -- • I' 0 Q1 aorc • m� owe w= • • 3 �Iw w v I • rc�i�� I dN • za o moa �w s•, Sao rc � -- --- z,a w F F yds I � I I C rno � R N 0 O N LL • IE b y d d O �Z p • i w y?IW N � d Y � UJ Wv Odd O I C S O U N C � � N W y I Ol F vii vii m a N N T T O .5 M SAJ 3 w i W Q o¢,¢, u H O 3 O ........... Q Centerville 2040 . Based on their analysis, the Metropolitan Council's new affordable housing goal for Centerville is to create 14 new affordable housing units between 2021 and 2030. TABLE 31 describes the affordable housing need allocation by percentage of area median income (AMI). Need for units affordable to Need for units affordable to Need for units affordable to >households with income at households with income households with >51% to or below 301/o AMI 31%o to 501/o AMI 80% AMI 9 4 1 The Metropolitan Council considers any housing development more than eight units per acre to qualify as affordable housing. Based on ThriveMSP 2040 allocations, Centerville has a total affordable housing allocation of 14 units. Table 22 identifies the area median income (AMI) distribution of that affordable housing allocation. The high density residential and central business district/mixed use districts have a minimum density of twelve units per acre which qualify as affordable housing as they exceed the eight units per acre minimum. Based on the City's development phasing plan (Map 4-3) it is anticipated that 7.54 acres of CBD/Mixed use land will develop by 2030. Land guided CBD/Mixed Use are required to develop with a minimum 25% residential. Based on that residential percentage, of the 7.54 acres of developed CBD/Mixed Use land, 1.89 acres will be residential development. That will result in a midpoint of 39 affordable housing units constructed by 2030 which exceeds the City's 2030 affordable housing allocation of 14 units. While the City is doing their part in creating a regulatory land use plan to plan for areas of density greater than 3-15 du/acre for medium, 12-30 du/acre for mixed use and 12-25 du/acre for high density units where most affordable housing will occur. Barriers to development of affordable housing still exist in the region as well as in Centerville. Some of these barriers are beyond the City's control including: • Steady increases in land prices. Chapter 4 1 Page 9 95 Centerville 2040 • Increase in construction costs. When combined with land prices, it becomes more difficult to provide affordable units through new construction. • Physical limitations of land due to wetlands, poor access, poor soils that would increase the cost of land development or construction thus making it more difficult to build affordable units. • Limited amount of remaining developable land. • State, county and local tax structures. • Availability of regional public transit options within the City. There are some significant barriers to construction of new affordable housing including the few named above. It is important that cities help in the effort to provide affordable housing. To assist in this effort, Centerville can use its regulatory tools, including implementing land use and zoning regulations that do not impede the construction of affordable housing. Many of these tools can help developers by reducing setback and open space requirements, increasing density, or reducing fees all in the effort to support construction of affordable housing. The following Housing Action Plan outlines efforts Centerville will explore to maintain existing affordable housing and create new affordable housing in the next ten years. The items are listed by category, including regulatory, financial and other. Chapter 4 1 Page 10 96 0 CL o-C -C Pa410'dVD:)V)sloafoid CD SuisnOH o!lqnd jjoddnS x (SVIH) se@jv IU@WaAoidwl guisnOH A2@12JIS 2uisnoq alis-p9jaj4e:)s x x S9!ljadoid DiHII x x d3d p@jLp!josuoDA:)ua2v aDueulj OuisnOH 2IOs9uu!N (1p u no:)IaW) x x x juejO saij!unwwoD alq2A!l ....................................................................................... sanbtupal Alqw@ssV aj!S x x x uoijejn2aj OujuoZ x x x x x (j@qlo'goci:))juawd0j@A9a Al!unwwoD AjunoD 2jouV x x x ....................................................................................... (shun ajqppjo�je'9:)uejsjsse AOjaua '9ouejs!sse j@Anq@wOH) x x diqsjaulied uo!IoV Aj!unww oo AjunoD ejouV weigoid juawaojojua x x @poD pue suoipadsui 9uplIng 0') (j@qjo'AjIuewnH jo}ILI!q2H-a-!)sweiSoid x x 1!lojd-uou Pm J9uIJ2d sjadojaA@p 2uisnoq x 9jqL-pjo_4L-Hl!m J9uIJ2d ....................................................................................... UD!IU9Aejd aj nso lo@joj p u e'sw 2j2oi d x aouels!sse j@Anq@wOH SjeJJa}a�aAIjJoddnS 9AIj:)a,49 x x 9OULU!j JuawaJoul x2i x x x x spuog guisnOH x (Val) s@!I!joqlnv ju@wd0j@A@Cj x x x 10 C) m —0 38 0 0v C, > E C� 0 0 2 P E — -2 0- -- Q 0 a C, E 01 > ID Ep Q3 0 -0 -6 0) IT ti ci 2 R 0 Pi. > 10 0) -0 o a CL a Centerville 2040 ...... .......................................... .......... ........................................................................................................................... . ...................................................................................................................... ... . ................................................................................................................. ........... ............................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................... Economic Development Authority and Economic Development Committee(EDA and EDC) Centerville's newly established Economic Development Authority may elect to support or get involved lin development projects, and will consider supporting those affordable housing projects that exemplify the housing goals enumerated in this plan. Although the Anoka County HRA does not currently operate projects within the City, Centerville should continue to partner with the County HRA on projects and program opportunities as they become available. Housing Bonds HRAs can issue bonds that help to develop and administer affordable housing developments or programs. Cities may make or purchase loans using the proceeds of the bond sales for activities such as new construction, acquisition and rehabilitation, or refinancing bond debt. There are specific affordable unit thresholds that must be met in bond-financed projects. Bond supported projects would typically support affordable housing for the 50%and 80% AMI bands. Tax Increment Financing Centerville may create a tax increment financing (TIF) district with the TIF bonds issued on this district used to support the construction of affordable housing. All property taxes received above the original tax value from Local funding the development is used to finance these bonds. Centerville has discretion over TIF for Affordable allocations. The City will consider using affordable housing TIF for projects that include not only a significant percentage of affordable units but also provide a Housing substantial public benefit(including but not limited to:environmental remediation, enhanced walkable urban design, open space or park land, provision of green space, stormwater infiltration, and/or improved streetscape design)and would not happen "butfor"TIF assistance.TIF-supported affordable housing projects will help to reduce the City's housing cost burden. By legislative definition, TIF that is used for affordable rental housing projects must meet provide affordability to those at 60% of AMI or less. The affordability threshold is 115% of AMI for owner occupied housing projects. Effective referrals The City supports providing appropriate resources and education for existing housing support programs offered by other agencies and organizations. While the city does not have the capacity to provide a full-time staff to offer this service, there are opportunities to more effectively communicate to residents and prospective residents about existing programs offered through Anoka County community action partnership, Habitat for Humanity, Center for Energy and the Environment, Anoka County HRA, and beyond. Effective housing referrals will increase opportunities for residents to enter the community whom would otherwise have barriers, and improve the likelihood of existing housing maintenance. Housing programs support residents at a range of income levels, from very low up to moderate incomes, depending on the program. ......................................................................................................... Chapter 4 1 Page 12 98 Centerville 2040 . First time homebuyer, down payment assistance, and foreclosure prevention programs The City encourages 'residents to access lexisting programs available through Anoka County Community Action Partnership, as well as the Minnesota Homeownership Center and the StartUp program through Minnesota Housing.The City will continue to form(partnerships with external organizations who offer these programs and seek to providereferral information wherever possible. These programs will be especially valuable to households at or below 80°1 AMI that would otherwise face extreme hardships in purchasing or maintaining a home. Partner with affordable housing developers. When feasible, Centerville will work with affordable housing developers who provide low-to-moderate income housing opportunities through housing development or redevelopment. The City will encourage an affordable housing component in residential redevelopment projects where site conditions and financing allow. Partnerwith non-profit programs. When feasible, the lCity will work collaboratively with (non-profits that offer housing programs, such as Habitat for Humanity and others, and make effective referrals to these programs. Building inspections and code enforcement programs. Centerville already offers building inspections and enforcement programs. These programs help to ensure that properties are well-maintained. The City intends to continue these programs, which will help Centerville achieve its housing maintenance goals. Anoka County Community Action Partnership ACCAP offers a variety of programs and services to the Centerville community that help to achieve the City's affordable housing goals. ACCAP manages affordable 'rental properties, offers housing rehabilitation and weatherization funding, 'home ' ownership education and foreclosure prevention counseling, and crisis funding. Many of these programs are targeted tolow-to-moderate income households.Centerville will continue to make appropriate referrals to ACCAP and work with this organization to help achieve the City's affordable Housing goals. Anoka County Community Development Anoka County Community Development offers assistance programs, including CDBG and HOME funds, when funding is available that support housing rehabilitation and affordable housing projects. Centerville will continue to work with the County HRA when appropriate and funding, programs and opportunities become available. Zoning regulation Centerville will continue to monitor its zoning and subdivision ordinances to make certain that its regulatory',policies align with its housing goals and aspirations as outlined in this Plan. Zoning regulation should be in alignment with and support the City's housing goals. Site assembly and/or acquisition The City will consider policies and participation in programs or opportunities that encourage reserving publicly owned properties, and other site assembly techniques for affordable housing. Chapter 4 1 Page 13 99 Centerville 2040 Livable CommunitiesDemonstration Account(LCDA) Centerville is eligible for Met Council funding for developments within the community that will innovative projects often involving affordable'and connected housing. The City will continue to work with ldevelopers in'coordination'with the Met Council in supporting RFP submissions for projects thatwillbringasignificant numberofnew affordable'units, and will urge more support for projects that meet affordability thresholds of 50% Regional Rt AMI or below as a reflection of the city's,greatest cost-burdened need. The City is Federal funding especially supportive of use of this grant opportunity to develop projects with a for Affordable strong'transit'-oriented development orientation'. Housing' MHFA Consolidated Request for Proposals This major annual funding request from Minnesota Housing Finance Agency supports affordable housing development.The City will continue to work with developers in coordination with MHFA in supporting RFP submissions for projects that will bring a significant number of new affordable units, and will urge more support for projects that meet affordability thresholds of 50%AMI or below as a reflection of the city's greatest cost-burdened need. Low Income Housing Tax Credit Properties(LIHTC)With LIHTC, developers apply for »tax credits to offset costs at the time of development. Although the City does not fund this type of assistance, Centerville will consider stating its intent of support for >developers who pursue LIHTC and who intend to 'seek ways to retain the affordability of the LIHTC property after the terms of LIHTC are up. Scattered site housing opportunities Scattered site housing creates affordable units throughout a neighborhood, instead of concentrating them in one area. Centerville Affordable can work with the Anoka County HRA to facilitate the creation of such units. Housing Improvement Areas(HIAs)MIAs are a defined area in a city in which housing Housing' improvements in condominium or townhome complexes may be financed with the Preservation assistance of the city(EDA, HRA). An active development authority would have the Strategies opportunity to designate an HIA in an area where existing housing needs improvement'for retention of housing affordability is at risk. Public and/or subsidized housing When feasible, Centerville will work collaboratively with entities that offer subsidized housing opportunities to very low- income residents. Housing subsidies are one of the only means by which to offer housing support to very low-income individuals and families, and Centerville recognizes this is an effective housing tool for very low-income, high-barrier and highly cost-burdened households. Chapter 4 1 Page 14 100 �. { Jr. qr _• L �Sk ,t 7 Centerville 2040 . ..... CHAPTER 5* PARKS AND TRAILS The City adopted a Park and Pedestrian System Comprehensive Plan in 1989, which provides goals, a needs assessment, concept plans and operations and maintenance information related to the local park and trail system. That document and this Plan are intended to serve as a basis for decisions regarding future implementation of the City park system. The plan elements reflected in the Park and Trails Plan are based on goals and polices developed during the Comprehensive Plan update process. It is the goal of the City of Centerville to: • Review and update the 1989 park and pedestrian system comprehensive plan. • Maintain existing trails, sidewalks, and parks equipment. • Provide convenient active and passive recreation opportunities that serve all the residents of Centerville. • Build new and upgrade existing park properties and trials with ecologically sound and sustainable materials, where possible. • Establish a biking/hiking trail system connecting city parks and residential neighborhoods. • Provide adequate expansion ofparks and recreation areas In proposed residential developments • Provide safe and convenient bicycle and pedestrian access to community recreation facilities. • Utilize and preserve parks and recreation opportunities on the shores of Centerville and Peltier Lakes with appropriate sustainable practices in mind. • Promote or provide recreational facilities and programs to serve the vaned recreational needs of all age groups in the Oty. Policies reflect the position of the City on the specific implementation of the Goals. It is the policy of the City of Centerville to: Chapter S I Page 1 102 Centerville 2040 . ..... • Develop a trail access plan which provide interconnection of major parks, recreation areas, schools, commercial nodes, Central Business District as well as existing and future community neighborhoods and implement the plan as funding opportunities allow. • Design and maintain parks with proper lighting, shelter and landscaping to ensure public and property safety, with sustainable practices which protect environmental resources for future generations. • Develop land use regulations compatible with adjacent parks, recreation areas and natural features • Require dedication of net developable parkland or cash In lieu of land In conjunctlon with the subdivision or re-development of all properties. • Encourage and accept land gifts and forfeitures in areas with potential recreational development opportunities or to provide open green space. • Coordinate regional trail development potential with Anoka County and adjacent communities There are currently eight improved City parks along with several other open spaces owned by the City as displayed on Map 5-1. This map shows all existing and planned parks and trails within the City. Chapter S I Page 2 103 m m a� H � `m � N �- � s Q V m s V ' O V ' O c V ------------ _ - - _ - - -_--_--- - - - --__I o� I ® I --------------------------- m® mem 'I rc i o II d Awa ma a L IkITu a w rc li -o 1w 12 i mmmmmmmmmmmmemmmmmmmmmmma w 1. Qa i i �emmeuuuoeeeeL o'w aa�ome .o a ¢ N1 °m�J F z� ya i I i. I oID NLL N U o z �I-Wk"Wo w ----I' x w �LLw moi - - to UZY m (6 g. N - � cD- Q V a V U r d � Centerville 2040 . ..... Laurie LaMotte Park is located southwest of the old central business district, along the western edge of the City. The park contains a hockey rink, a pleasure skating rink, soccer fields, softball diamonds, and park building. This is the largest City park at approximately 19.8 acres and is the primary facility for organized recreation activities in the City. Tracie Joy McBride Park, a neighborhood park, is approximately 4.2 acres, and is located at the north end of Shad Avenue and contains playground equipment. Royal Meadows Park, located between Shad Avenue and West Robin Lane, is another neighborhood park with playground equipment and contains approximately four acres. Acorn Creek Park is three acres in size with existing playground equipment. It is located on Revoir Street. Eagle Park is another small neighborhood park containing a tennis court and playground equipment. Lastly, and the most recent addition to the park system is Hidden Spring Park; a small park on Centerville Lake. It features a picnic shelter, charcoal grills, benches, gravel trails several interpretive signs and a unique water feature which incorporates a natural artesian well. As the City is reaching full development the park plan is likewise fairly established. New residential development will still occur within the southeast corner of the City and northern portion. These areas will likely see new neighborhood scale parks to meet the needs of these new residents. Prior to development occurring in these areas, the City will work with developers to identify the specific locations best suited to providing the public amenities and recreational facilities needed to serve these areas. Ideally, all residential development should be within a half mile of either a neighborhood or community park. The City's subdivision regulations require the dedication of park land or cash in lieu of land in conjunction with the subdivision of all lands. As indicated above, the City will identify specific sites for needed parks before these areas are developed. When plats are submitted for land containing proposed park sites, the City will require dedication of the sites as a condition of plat approval. If site requirements are greater than the dedication of a particular subdivision,the Chapter S I Page 4 105 Centerville 2040 . ..... City may locate parks where multiple dedications may occur or use dedication funds to acquire additional land. identified corridors in the City's plan for bicycle/pedestrian trails will also be dedicated as part of the City's park land dedication requirements. The dedication of land should be based upon net developable land. Wetlands and other unbuildable land may be included in a land dedication, but only in excess or in addition to the minimum developable land requirement. In other subdivisions, the developers will be required to make payments in lieu of land dedication. The City will not accept the dedication of park land in developments where parks are not planned. Funds received from payment in lieu of park land dedication will be placed in a separate fund designated for park land acquisition and improvements. The dedication formula required in the subdivision regulations will be determined by the City's Capital Improvements Program, park development plans and strategy for needed park land and park improvements. The Rice Creek Chain of Lakes Regional Park Reserve, located in the northwestern corner of the City, has an overall land area of 4,400 acres, of which 149 acres are within Centerville's City limits. A master plan for the Rice Creek Chain of Lakes Regional Park was recently adopted by Anoka County. The Regional Park Reserve accounts for 9.6% of the acreage of Centerville. This regional asset is shown on the City's Parks and Trails Plan. The Metropolitan Council's classification as a regional park reserve requires that 80% of its land area must remain in a natural state. Existing facilities within the Regional Park Reserve are picnic areas, parking, boat launches, canoe launches, fishing pier, campgrounds, nature center, heritage lab, a prairie restoration project, cross country ski trails, a swimming beach with bath house/restroom, playground and drinking fountain, and Chomonix Golf Course. The City recognizes the value of the park reserve as a resource to the region and the City, and will continue to take measures to insure protection of the reserve from adverse impacts of development. Chapter S I Page 5 106 Centerville 2040 . ..... Two important regional trails have been identified and mapped on the Parks and Trails Plan. The first is the Central Anoka County Regional Trail that runs east/west through the City along Main Street (County Road 14). This trail connects to the Rice Creek Chain of Lakes on the west and to the Hardwood Creek Regional Trail in Washington County. The second trail, Rice Creek Chain of Lakes-Bald Eagle Regional Trail connects to the Central Anoka County Trail through the regional park. It extends north/south on the western portion of the City along County Road 21 and County Road 14. The development of these two regional trails through the heart of Centerville is a great benefit to the residents to improve access to three significant regional parks and abundant recreation opportunities. The City has prepared a trails plan that identifies a system of bikeways, trails and sidewalks connecting City parks and major bicycle/pedestrian traffic generators. These include schools, the downtown area, and Rice Creek Chain of Lakes Regional Park Reserve. The bikeway/pedestrian system will include trails and sidewalks. All existing and proposed trails in the City are identified on the Parks and Trails Plan (Map 5-1). Proposed trails are listed below: • County Road 54 from the southern boundary of the City to Center Street. • CSAH 21 Centerville Rd between the southern City limit and Dupre Road. • Additional trails and sidewalks to be considered within new developments Proposed corridors in areas being platted will be dedicated to the City as part of the City's park dedication requirements. Implementation of the trails system will be included in the Capital Improvements Program of the City. Chapter S I Page 6 107 _ice ���• ^ '�� '��_ v Chapte = Transportati Centerville 2040 CHAPTER 6: TRANSPORTATION It is the goal of the City of Centerville to: • Maintain a safe, efficient and convenient multi-modal transportation system. • Protect the integrity of the transportation system. • Provide sufficient off-street parking. Policies reflect the position of the City on the specific implementation of the Goals. It is the policy of the City of Centerville to: • Develop land use development standards that promote safe and efficient access to the transportation system. • Develop land uses and access spacing guidelines compatible with the functional classification of the regional highway system. • Establish a local transportation network which preserves neighborhood identity while linking together neighborhoods, community parks and facilities. • Identify long term transportation corridors to provide access to and within the City as development occurs. • Identifypotential trail corridors for long term linkage to neighborhoods, public parks and businesses and construct those trails as funding allows. • Coordinate transportation planning and system improvements with surrounding communities as well as Anoka County and the Minnesota Department of Transportation. • Work with the Metro Transit to maximize transit opportunities for the community. This Plan has been prepared to be consistent with the regional transportation strategies outlined in the Metropolitan Council 2040 Transportation Policy Plan Chapter 6 1 Pagel 109 Centerville 2040 . (TPP). Similar to this Plan, the TPP evaluates the existing transportation system, identifies transportation challenges to the region, and sets regional goals, objectives, and priorities to meet the transportation needs of current residents while accommodating the region's anticipated growth. The TPP also guides local agencies in coordinating land use and transportation and establishes regional performance measures and targets. The TPP is guided by the following goals: • Transportation system stewardship: Sustainable investments in the transportation system are protected by strategically preserving, maintaining, and operating system assets. • Safety and Security: The regional transportation system is safe and secure for all users. • Access to Destinations: People and businesses prosper by using a reliable, affordable, and efficient multimodal transportation system that connects them to destinations throughout the region and beyond. • Competitive Economy: The regional transportation system supports the economic competitiveness, vitality, and prosperity of the region and State. • Healthy Environment: The regional transportation system advances equity and contributes to communities' livability and sustainability while protecting the natural, cultural, and developed environments. • Leveraging Transportation Investment to Guide Land Use: The region leverages transportation investments to guide land use and development patterns that advance the regional vision of stewardship, prosperity, livability, equity, and sustainability. Funding is a key constraint that is acknowledged in the TPP. Current transportation revenue will not meet the region's transportation needs through 2040. As a result, the TPP includes two long-term investment scenarios: a fiscally-constrained scenario that identifies projects anticipated to be funded based on current revenue projections, and an increased revenue scenario that identifies project priorities should additional transportation funding become available. Under the current revenue scenario, the TPP is focused on operations and maintenance of the existing transportation system. Investments in highway mobility and access are limited to those projects that address multiple TPP goals Chapter 6 1 Page 2 110 Centerville 2040 and objectives. The increased revenue scenario would allow additional investments in operations and maintenance, as well as regional mobility, access, safety, and bicycle/pedestrian improvements. However, congestion cannot be greatly reduced under even the increased revenue scenario. Under both scenarios, proposed investments are focused on areas of the metro with the greatest existing and future challenges and anticipated growth. The Metropolitan Council classifies Centerville under the Emerging Suburban Edge Community Designation. Based on Thrive MSP2040, Emerging Suburban Edge areas are expected to plan for forecasted population and household growth at average densities of at least three to five units per acre for new development and redevelopment. These communities are also expected to target opportunities for more intensive development near regional transit investments when available. The functional classification system groups roadways into classes based on roadway function and purpose. Functional classification is based on both transportation and land use characteristics, including roadway speeds, access to adjacent land, connection to important land uses, and the length of trips taken on the roadway. Four classes of roadways are included in the seven-county metropolitan area functional classification system: principal arterials, minor arterials, collector streets, and local streets. Map 6-1 shows the existing and planned functional classification of each road in the City of Centerville. The following sections describe each functional class in greater detail and indicate which roadways fall into each classification. Minor Arterials Minor arterials maintain a focus on mobility, but provide more land access than principal arterials. Minor arterials are intended to serve trips of four to eight miles in length.Within developing areas of the metro,these facilities are spaced between one and two miles apart. Minor arterials connect cities and towns within the region and link to regional business and commercial concentrations. Access points along minor arterials are generally at-grade and typically controlled.with signals.or..stop.signs........................................................... Chapter 6 1 Page 3 111 Centerville 2040 . During peak traffic, minor arterials in developing areas are intended to maintain 30 mph average speeds. As a result, transportation system connections are limited to interstate freeways, other principal arterials, other minor arterials, collectors, and some local streets. Land access is limited to concentrations of commercial and industrial land uses. The Metropolitan Council has established a system of"A" Minor and "B" Minor arterials. "A" Minor arterials are eligible for federal funding administered by the Metropolitan Council. The Metropolitan Council has further split "A" Minor arterials into four types, described below: • Relievers: Arterials located parallel to congested principal arterials. The purpose of"A" Minor Relievers is to provide additional capacity in congested corridors. • Augmenters: Arterials that supplement the principal arterials system within urban centers and urban communities. • Expanders: Arterials that supplement principal arterials in less-densely developed areas of the metro area. • Connectors: Arterials that provide connections between rural towns and connect rural areas with the principal arterial system. A Functional Classification Map of the City's Road and Highway System is included as Map 6-1. Interstate 35E (a principal arterial) is located just east of the City limits. A full interchange with Anoka County State Aid Highway 14 (CSAH 14) provides interstate access to the City. Running east-west through the downtown area, CSAH 14 is the City's most used "A-Minor Arterial". The A-minor designation is further defined for this roadway as an "Expander". CSAH 14 is currently and planned to remain a three-lane roadway. The city's only other A-minor arterial is CSAH 54 which is currently and planned to remain a two-lane roadway running north-south along the City's eastern edge. It is considered an A-minor Reliever for its role as a frontage road to 35E. Both A-minor arterials are under county jurisdiction. The county also has a B-minor Arterial; CSAH 21 running north-south along the City's western edge and leading into the downtown where it terminates at CSAH 14. Chapter 6 1 Page 4 112 o 0 � V Q m V � e S C��c3LGCfl�° la `C��Y,9 €W�mC6A�GG1i7 a flMOP F§ i g F C]ueL n�)10VV�H OLL oueL13)10VVOH OLL (OboZ)lOV 0098 i (oboZ)lOV 008'S S(waLro)iav ooe'e liovooz's IRS s � aU� g UJ m� Iii w g g 3NY y NzaW d 0(oboz)iavooz'z -----------------_pY JW W d � _� Q_ . F _ - - - - _ — � 2Za CV2 Y V WW O NJY o v Q _ N ID OLL 0 N M N V : o m v m � 2 N -- °' v V a N o i E �° m U o N C I t v a 0 rc rc - - z Quu m 1 u 1 w Ja uJ l 0 F.y.. Q �3¢ Centerville 2040 . Major and Minor Collectors Major and minor collector roadways provide linkages to larger developments and community amenities. They generally do not link communities to one another. Collector roadways generally favor access to the system over mobility, but try to balance the two competing needs. Collector roadways are generally lower speed than the principal or minor arterial routes. Collector roadways are often owned and operated by cities, although counties operate some of these facilities. Within Centerville, seven collector roadways are owned and operated by the city. Collectors are intended to serve trips of one to four miles in length. Collectors link minor arterials, other collectors, and local streets. Major collectors typically serve higher density residential areas and concentrations of commercial and industrial land uses. These facilities tend to serve longer trips than minor collectors. Major collectors within the city include the following: • Peltier Lake Drive • Mill Road • Old Mill Road • Brian Drive • Dupre Road • 21St Avenue North There are no minor collectors within the city, and the 2040 Transportation Policy Plan does not propose any additional collector roadways within the city. The City has planned a network of local collector roads. These existing and proposed roads are shown, schematically, on Map 6-1. Roadway Type Roadway Name Existing Number Future Number of Lanes of Lanes Major Collector 21St Avenue 2 2 A-Minor Expander Main Street (CSAH 14) west 2 2 of 20th Avenue A-Minor Expander Main Street (CSAH 14) east 4 4 of 20th Avenue A-Minor Reliever 20th Avenue 2 2 —B-Minor Arterial Centerville Road (CSAH 21) 2 2 Chapter 6 1 Page 6 114 Centerville 2040 Local Roadways The primary function of local roadways is land access. Local roadways connect individual land parcels with other local roadways and collectors. Trips on local roadways are typically under two miles. Speeds on local roadways are typically low. Longer trips are facilitated by local roadway connections to the collector and arterial systems. Local roadways are under the jurisdiction of the City of Centerville. Local roadways are all roadways that are not arterials or collectors. Planned Functional Classification Other than new proposed roadways shown schematically, no functional classification changes are currently recommended in the city. C The City understands that access management for state and county roadways is under their respective jurisdictions. Both MNDOT and Anoka County have their own access management policies applicable to each of their roadway systems, respectively. The City maintains its own policies on access to its local roadway network. These policies are similar to those of the Anoka County and the State of Minnesota but are more appropriately formed for a local municipal roadway system. Anoka County has established access management guidelines for County roadways, as displayed in Table 6-1. Roadway Route Full Conditional Signal Private' Type Speed Movement Secondary Spacing Access' (miles Intersection Intersection per hour) Principal 50- 55 1 mi. 1/2 mi. 1 mi. Subject to Arterial 40-45 1/2 mi. 1/4 mi. 1/2 mi. conditions <40 1/8 mi. 300 — 660 ft 1/4 mi for all Minor 50- 55 1/2 mi. 1/4 mi. 1/2 mi. roadway Arterial 40-45 1/4 mi. 1/8 mi. 1/4 mi. types and <40 1/8 mi. 300 — 660 ft 1/4 mi. speeds. Collector 50- 55 1/2 mi. 1/4 mi. 1/2 mi. and Local 1 40-45 1/8 mi. NA 1/4 mi. Chapter 6 1 Page 7 115 Centerville 2040 . < 40 1/8 mi. 300 — 660 ft 1/8 mi 1 : Forecasted 2040 volumes for A minor Arterials were taken from Anoka County's volume projections for their roadway system. None of the planned improvements to the metropolitan highway system listed in the Transportation Policy Plan directly affect the City of Centerville. In the fall of 2007, CSAH 14 began reconstruction. The roadway was reconstructed over a 3-year period from I-35W to I-35E. The improvements included the addition of a center turn lane throughout the downtown area. Additionally, a median restricts access at several locations on the east end of the City. In response to this,the City planned and constructed a "Backage Road" to connect 21St Ave. with 20th Ave., allowing better access to local businesses and a way for locals to move throughout town without having to make U-turns. The City anticipates a similar style reconstruction of CSAH 21 in the three block area of downtown. This project will likely be initiated by the City through its downtown redevelopment plan. The City has a number of planned improvements to its local collector road system. Those improvements are shown on Map 6-1. These improvements will be made as development occurs. Connection between Land Use and Transportation The City recognizes the connection between land use, natural resource protection and transportation planning. City policies guide land use to be compatible with both existing natural resources as well as local and regional transportation facilities. The City's downtown redevelopment will be served by the newly reconstructed/expanded CSAH 14 and the future reconstruction of CSAH 21. Additionally, the guiding of property on the south side of Main Street (CSAH 14) between Progress Road and City Hall from low density residential to mixed use development will capitalize on the anticipated increase in average daily Chapter 6 1 Page 8 116 Centerville 2040 traffic as well as move single family residential away from a highly trafficked roadway. The City has not conducted any recent corridor studies regarding roadway improvements. Need to Expand Facilities The City will experience growth in two major areas. The first is in the small sections of undeveloped land within the City. These development areas do not represent large enough amounts of potential traffic to tax the local and regional transportation systems. The City also plans to redevelop its downtown area. This redevelopment proposal was large enough to trigger an Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW). The conclusion of the EAW, with regard to transportation issues, was that the local and regional roadway system could handle the increased densities in the downtown area with minor modifications in the immediate area, such as the addition of turn lanes, etc. It also concluded that the redevelopment was not the primary cause of the need for these improvements, but rather that it was regional growth. Growth projections are in line with those shown in the System Statement. Potential Safety Issues The City does not anticipate any specific safety issues within its jurisdictional roadway system as a result of growth. Policies regarding access management, geometric design and signage enforced by the City on its existing and planned roadways help maintain a safe local transportation system. Where applicable access management guidelines have been incorporated into the City's subdivision and zoning ordinances. A number of sidewalk and trail projects are in the planning or construction phase in an effort to increase pedestrian safety. A curb and trail along the east side of Mill Road will allow separation of pedestrians from this higher volume local roadway. Improvements in the Downtown area are slated to meet the same goal. Chapter 6 1 Page 9 117 Centerville 2040 . The City of Centerville is separated between four different TAZ zones. Population, household, and employment forecasts (see Table 20 in the Land Use Chapter) are allocated by their respective TAZ's. While Centerville is split amongst four (4) TAZ areas, one of the areas, TAZ 167 is comprised entirely of regional park space and thus does not have any projected households, population, or employment figures to be included. The City has allocated growth based on distribution of desired land use as well as existing and planned infrastructure. Those allocations are shown in Table 34 below which are consistent with the projections of the Metropolitan Council. TAZ 161 2010 20202030 2040 Households 684 722 735 741 Population 1974 1979 1990 2003 Employment 165 126 138 156 TAZ 164 2010 2020 ' 2030 2040 Households 478 514 544 579 Population 1361 1412 1476 1572 Employment 239 388 395 406 TAZ 166 2010 2020 ' 2030 2040 Households 153 164 171 179 Population 1361 1412 1476 1572 Employment 5 26 26 28 7 . •, '� I i� t " '.t. ' j .. lye.. The Metropolitan Council 2040 TPP encourages the use of bicycles as a mode of transportation and establishes a Regional Bicycle Transportation Network (RBTN) to establish an integrated network of on-street bikeways and off-road trails that complement each other to improve conditions for bicycle transportation at the regional level. The RBTN identifies Tier 1 and Tier 2 alignments where existing regional or other trails exist or where a specific Chapter 6 1 Page 10 118 Centerville 2040 alignment has been identified. The RBTN also identifies Tier 1 and Tier 2 corridors where specific alignments have not yet been defined. The City maintains policies which support the design of safe and efficient trails throughout the City along existing and developing roadways as well as through off-road corridors. A map of the City's existing and proposed trails is shown in Map 5-1. More detailed goals and policies regarding trails can be found in Chapter 5 which is the parks and trails chapter of this plan. Map 5-1 also depicts the Regional Bicycle Transportation Network (RBTN) within the City and its relationship with the local network of trails and sidewalks. A Tier 2 RBTN alignment aligns with CSAH 14 at the northern boundary of the City and extends along CSAH 14 to the eastern boundary of the City. Also, a Tier 2 RBTN runs along CSAH 21 from the southern boundary of the City to CSAH 14. The City does not contain a regional employment cluster or activity center node. The planned redevelopment of the downtown area will have a distinct pedestrian friendly feel, accomplished through streetscaping elements such as boulevard trees, decorative concrete sidewalks and intersection treatments, on- street parking, decorative pedestrian lighting and other landscape amenities. A network of trails will allow bicycle access to the downtown while providing viable bypass routes for those on more regional trips through the area. No planned regional or local trails require connections over major physical barriers such as freeways, railroad corridors, rivers or streams Bicycles and pedestrians can access the regional transit network by accessing the park and ride facility at Main Street (CSAH 14) and 21St Street which serves as a stop for Route 275. Trails that provide pedestrian and bicycle access to this facility include the regional trail along CSAH 14 as well as planned city trails through downtown and sidewalks along CSAH 21. At this time the City is not involved in any right-of-way preservation projects or corridor studies. Chapter 6 1 Page 11 119 Centerville 2040 . Centerville is located in transit market area IV. Centerville currently has limited transit service, with the Route 275 bus running on weekdays during the AM and PM rush hours. This service runs on roughly 30 minute intervals with service beginning at 6:00 am and ending at 7:40 am for AM rush hour and drop-off between 4:18 and 5:50 for PM rush hour. Route 275 runs between Centerville and downtown Saint Paul, where riders can transfer to other routes. Centerville has one park and ride location at Main Street (CSAH 14) and 21" Avenue N. The location of this facility is shown on the Transportation Plan Map (Map 6-1). Centerville also has public dial-a-ride service provided by Anoka County Traveler and Anoka County Volunteer. Centerville is not within any influence area of an airport within the regional airspace system. The closest airport is Anoka County-Janes Field in Blaine, approximately nine miles west of the City. Centerville is identified by the Metropolitan Council as a City potentially impacted by seaplane base activity. The City will cooperate with the Minnesota Department of Transportation regarding activities that may have potential impact on seaplane operations. The City regulates the construction of objects affecting navigable airspace as well as structures and activities which have the potential to cause electronic interference. The City will notify the Federal Aviation Agency of any proposed structures exceeding 200 feet. There are no rail lines, barge facilities or intermodal freight terminals with the City of Centerville.The City does have land guided for commercial and industrial land in the southeastern portion of the City that once developed is anticipated to generate increased commercial traffic.This traffic will travel along 21St Avenue North to CSAH 14 to connect to Interstate 35E. There are presently no issues related to insufficient height, width, or turning radii along that route that would inhibit commercial traffic. Map 6-1 provides current heave commercial average annual daily traffic (HCAADT) estimates. Chapter 6 1 Page 12 120 4 1 ' � I 444 �r 'I .� � � a � � � +► , .1 Rl1 l enteryi.CCe '1_:d nG1 ishr,l� 0000�0.,O� 121 Centerville 2040 Chapter 7:Water Resources .......................................................................................................... CHAPTER 7- WATER RESOURCES A During the Comprehensive Planning process, the City developed goals related to Water Resources and public utilities. It is the goal of the City of Centerville to: • Promote safe neighborhoods and low crime in the community. • Maintain and improve the quality of life In the communiiy. • Provide efficient and responsive services to residents and businesses. • Maintain the quality of education available to residents • Protect Surface Water resources within and downstream from the City of Centerville. Policies reflect the position of the City on the specific implementation of the Goals. It is the policy of the City of Centerville to: • Compare the level of administrative, maintenance and emergency response services to community wide needs and objectives. • Explore potential, oint service initiatives through continued communication and cooperation with City, County and School officials. • Promote effective communication with residents, business owners, educators and volunteer organizations to maintain an understanding of communitygoals and objectives and participate In community affairs. • Periodically evaluate the level ofpubllc services provided and the associated costs of services. • Design public utility systems for optimum development or saturation In the community and establish cost effective staging or sequencing of utility systems. • Establish priority for basic services to ensure the highest levels of safety and accessibility are provided In the community. • Expand efforts for effective communication and cooperation with surrounding cities on area growth Issues and common concerns • Require that development proposals are consistent with planned extensions ofpublic utilities and incorporate necessary extensions of core facilities • Prohibit development with private utilities. Chapter 7 1 Page 1 122 Centerville 2040 Chapter 7:Water Resources • Require that the installation of all public infrastructure is designed and constructed according to City standards and specifications. • Enforce ordinance provisions which require connection of existing homes and businesses with private utilities to public utility systems, within a reasonable time after public utilities have become available. • Anoka county to enforce provisions ofMPCA Chapter 7080 for the maintenance ofprivate on-site waste treatment systems. • Establish design and construction standards for sanitary sewer installation and maintenance to minimize potential sources of inflow/infiltration in the sewer collection system. • Continue monitoring potential sources of inflow/infiltration to reduce inefficiencies in the metropolitan wastewater treatment system. • Ensure consistency with all watershed rules, especially as they relate to surface water. • Continue to implement conservation programs aimed at reducing residential water use. The city's wastewater collection system serves all but a handful of rural residential style lots and is designed and already constructed to handle the limited developable area left. All lands within the city are able to be served by simple extension of the existing sewer system, from the adjacent property. Therefore, the entire city would be considered one district. There is no need for any sort of phasing plan. The city serves a small, residential neighborhood (38 homes) in Lino Lakes at the end of LaMotte Drive and a campground in the Anoka County regional Park (in Lino Lakes). These are the only sources of intercommunity flow. There are no plans to serve additional extraterritorial areas. No homes or businesses in Centerville are served by anyone else. The city is surrounded entirely by the city of Lino Lakes and cannot (except under very special circumstances) annex any land. Map 7-1 shows the city's sanitary sewer collections system, which consists of mostly PVC mains, ranging from 8-inch to 16-inch in size. The city's system is relatively new with the oldest mains built in the 19701s. An 18-inch and 21-inch reinforced concrete pipe trunk main runs just inland of the east shore of Centerville Lake. All of the city's flow enters the Met Council's system at the MCES Lift Station in LaMotte Park. There are no future connection points to the MCES system planned. There are no wastewater treatment facilities in our community, public or private. Estimate Forecasts 2017 2020 2030 2040 Chapter 7 1 Page 2 123 Centerville 2040 Chapter 7:Water Resources .......................................................................................................... Households (Total) 1,378 1,400 1,450 1,500 MCES 1374* 1389 1445 1500 SSTS 13* 11 5 0 Employment(Total) 430 540 560 590 MCES 430 >540 560 590 SSTS 0 0 0 0 *Figures are per City billing records, which does not exactly match Met Council Estimated Households Insert here - SanItary Mapl w1various elements In checkli5t Some undeveloped parcels contain homesteads served by Individual Sewage Treatment Systems (ISTS). Less than a dozen of these systems remain within the City limits. The City's code does not allow subdivision or development without connection to City sewer and water (Chapter 153.17). City ordinance also does not allow existing ISTS to be replaced as long as connection to City sewer is feasible. The City also plans to have all residents connected to city water and sewer services by 2040. For the small number of existing ISTS, the City employs Anoka County's services for required inspections. If for some reason, a new ISTS would be the only available form of sewering an existing parcel, the City would ensure that it was designed and constructed in accordance with MPCA rule 7080. This is, however, highly unlikely. hlflo,vf iwd hlhlh-ilh()�l Met Council has consistently concluded that Centerville's flows during wet weather events do not show significant signs of Inflow or Infiltration (1/1). This is likely due to the fact that most of the city's sewer system (both public and private) was constructed, post 1970, from largely gasketed, PVC pipe. Ordinance #XX (see Appendix XX) prohibits sump pumps, foundation drains and rain leaders from being connected to, and/or discharged into, the sanitary sewer. The city's programs and strategies to prevent VI consist of links on the City's website to VI prevention information for homeowners, information placed in the City's newsletter, on the City's website or social media feeds and brochures in the front lobby of city hall. Again, because the City has such minimal VI issues, the City's VI prevention or mitigation program may be smaller than others, but is appropriate, relative to the size of the problem. Regularly, portions of the City's sewer are televised in a rotation ensuring all mains are televised every ten years. During these inspections, services exhibiting constant clear water flows are noted and investigated for possible illegal connections. Chapter 7 1 Page 3 124 Centerville 2040 Chapter 7:Water Resources .......................................................................................................... Insert excerpt from Met Councll letter on 1/1 here: The City of Centerville is entirely surrounded by the City of Lino Lakes. Therefore, development boundaries are well defined. The City is nearing the point of full build-out. Small sections of undeveloped land in the City's northern, southern and eastern reaches exist, undeveloped at this time. Some of these undeveloped parcels contain homesteads served by Individual Sewage Treatment Systems (ISTS). Less than a dozen of these systems remain within the City limits. The City's code does not allow subdivision or development without connection to City sewer and water (Chapter 153.17). City ordinance also does not allow existing ISTS to be replaced as long as connection to City sewer is feasible. The City also plans to have all residents connected to city water and sewer services by 2040. For the small number of existing ISTS, the City employs Anoka County's services for required inspections. If for some reason, a new ISTS would be the only available form of sewering an existing parcel, the City would ensure that it was designed and constructed in accordance with MPCA rule 7080. This is, however, highly unlikely. By the end of the planning period (2040), the City anticipates full build-out of its undeveloped areas. The City's existing trunk main and lift station facilities are designed to handle the flow from these small, remaining areas without further upgrade. Some trunk mains may need minor extensions to reach the unsewered areas, but no upsizing will be required downstream to accommodate these developments. Figure 7-1 shows the City's Sanitary Sewer Collection System including gravity and forcemain pipes, manholes, lift stations and remaining ISTS. The map also shows schematic representations of future trunk main extensions to serve undeveloped parcels. Table 37, below, shows flow estimates from the City based on proposed population growth which is slightly higher than that projected in the system statement. Land use assumptions, and thus flow assumptions for 2025 and 2035 are assumed to be a midpoint between other projections (i.e. flow rate for 2025 is a midpoint between 2020 and 2030), and thus are not shown in the table. Chapter 7 1 Page 4 125 Centerville 2040 Chapter 7:Water Resources .......................................................................................................... ..................................................... 2000 2010** 2020 2030 2040 Change 2010-2040 Total Population Sewered 3,712 3920 4350 4864 1,152 Unsewered 9 9 6 0 -9 Household Size* 2.76 2.72 2.64 2.56 -0.22 Total Households Sewered 1,345 1425 1590 1900 555 Unsewered 7 0 0 0 -7 Total Employment Sewered 600 700 800 900 300 Unsewered 2 2 0 0 -2 .............................................................................................. ............................................ .............. ............................... .......................... 2000 2010** 2020 2030 2040 Change 2010-2040 System Statement ......................................................................... Avg. Annual 0.28 0.38 0.70 ?? Ask Kris from Sanitary Flow MCES annual (MGD)- billings Allowable 1.08 1.08 1.22 ?? Peak Hourly Flow (MGD)* Proposed City Projects Avg. Annual 0.292 0.395 0.491 ?? Sanitary Flow (MGD) Proposed 1.08 1.41 1.71 Allowable PHF (MGD) *from Met Council system statement forecast in 2005 **households same as actual unit count in January 2008 Justification of the population and employment numbers shown above can be found in the land use chapter. Flow projections were derived by assigning 75 gallons per capita per day for residents plus 25 gallons per employee per day working in the City. These assumptions match closely when they are applied to existing population and employment numbers and then compared to actual flow readings. Chapter 7 1 Page 5 126 Centerville 2040 Chapter 7:Water Resources .......................................................................................................... Since the City is served by interceptor 9708 with a capacity of 0.5 MGD, these projections should be able to be accommodated, especially given that the 2040 projections represent a full build-out scenario. The city's Local Water Plan .... The city's Wellhead Protection Plan .... Chapter 7 Page 6 127 r -i3r.Lr �:r � r .. L 1 �Y enteryilfe 128 Centerville 2040 x CHAPTER 8: RESILIENCE AND SUSTAINABILITY As required by state statute, a municipality's comprehensive plan must also include strategies for protection of special resources, including solar access, historic preservation, and aggregate. These strategies are discussed below. Solar Access The City's zoning and subdivision ordinance prevents solar collectors from being shaded by adjacent structures or vegetation and ensures that development decisions do not preclude the possible future development and use of solar energy systems. To ensure the availability of solar access,the City of Centerville will,whenever possible, protect access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems on principle structures. The City of Centerville will consider solar access in the review of site plans and planning decisions. As part of its implementation plan, the City will be developing an ordinance to regulate both architectural and ground mount solar energy systems. Map 8-1 provided by the Metropolitan Council depicts the gross solar potential for the City. Chapter 8 1 Page 1 129 Centerville 2040 Map 8-1 Gross Solar Potential x - R Centerville a I f ` 1 - i 0 05 7 Extent of Main Map ___—_—___ Mlles ANoKA Ir p 17 4111iGross Solar Potential _'^ f (Watt-hours per Year) VVAGHI NGTON _High:1265961 I 'HENNEPIN +RAMGEY � �, � I f Low:900001 -- ��� Solar Potential under 900,000 watt-hours per year L._�71 =�. �____County Boundaries _'� sccT D,4KOTAC �•__•�City and Township Boundaries ^dr ° pj Wetlands and Open Water Features SourceUniversity of Minnesota USpatial Statewide Solar Raster- Chapter 8 Page 2 130 ,1 f C, nterii!( 131 Centerville 2040 . CHAPTER 9- ECONOMIC COMPETITIVENESS v . V In 2017, Centerville formed and Economic Development Authority(EDA) with all the associated powers and responsibilities including taxing authority. The EDA will work on economic development activities including development, redevelopment, and job growth within the City. The City and EDA will utilize the below goals and policies in promoting the development and redevelopment of properties within the City. The City's zoning ordinance will provide the standards to which development is required to adhere. / i It is the goal of the City of Centerville to: • Provide for a variety of employment and development opportunities in the City. • Expand employment and tax base in the City. • Maintain and improve the City's downtown Central Business District according to the downtown development guidelines. • Utilize the Main Street corridor for additional commercial uses in Centerville. • Expand and diversify the city's tax base by encouraging new commercial retail development. It is the policy of the City of Centerville to: • Require that all commercial uses utilize public utility systems. • Create a cohesive identity for all commercial areas with design guidelines for buildings, signage, and streetscaping. • Provide adequate lot sizes and minimum buildable areas for business uses to provide for convenient and safe access, adequate parking, site buffering and landscaping. • Avoid incompatibilities between commercial uses and residential uses. • Develop sign regulations that regulate size, height, placement, materials and composition to ensure signs do not detract from the small town-feel and natural beauty of the City. In general free-standing, large or internally lit signs should be prohibited. • Evaluate TIF, CDBG and other funding options to provide assistance for CBD redevelopment. • Develop retail uses in a clustered or shopping center concept as a preferred alternative to strip malls or scattered development. • Connect shopping areas to each other and to residential areas with sidewalks and pedestrian byways and bicycle trails. Chapter 9 1 Pagel 132 Centerville 2040 . • Establish commercial land uses in proximity to commercial development of adjacent communities to maximize the benefit for businesses within Centerville. • Maintain standards for landscaping and screening to ensure adequate aesthetic controls. • Maintain adequate standards for buildings and signage design, site access, parking, maneuvering, loading, and structure setbacks. • Enforce standards for structure upkeep and site maintenance to ensure long-term aesthetic controls. • Revisit all established standards as appropriate. M ! f It is the goal of the City of Centerville to: • Support the development of a mixed-use downtown consistent with the goals laid out in the Master Plan. • Use the mixed-use designation to promote well-designed, pedestrian-oriented development that enhances the quality of life for City residents and promotes a "traditional neighborhood" or small town atmosphere. • Review the downtown development plan and guidelines. It is the policy of the City of Centerville to: • Require that all development in the area identified as the downtown follow the goals, policies and guidelines of the Downtown Master Plan. • Utilize City regulatory and economic development tools to encourage commercial and residential development within the downtown area that is consistent with the vision of the Master Plan. • Require that all development within areas guided for mixed-use have sidewalks on both sides of every street. • Utilize design guidelines for mixed-use areas to: o Minimize the impact of automobiles through strategies such a shared parking, in which adjacent land uses having different peak-hour parking demands can share parking facilities o Achieve "traffic calming" benefits through: an integrated street network, provision of options for traffic flow, the design of streets with adequate width, and the provision of on-street parking o Provide for public open space that uses storm water treatment ponds as a visual and recreational amenity to the project o Ensure the compatibility of buildings with respect to the specific character of their immediate context o Encourage active ground floor uses, such as restaurants, shops and services, to animate the street within mixed-use areas Chapter 9 1 Page 2 133 Centerville 2040 . V: °\I \j f t It is the goal of the City of Centerville to: • Expand the non-residential tax base. • Encourage clean and attractive industrial uses in the community. It is the policy of the City of Centerville to: • Focus on investments and development potential in the existing industrial park before establishing new industrial development areas. • Evaluate land availability and utility feasibility for long range expansion of the existing industrial park. • Evaluate TIF feasibility to expand transportation access and trunk utility networks to support existing and future industrial potential. • Establish uniform design standards to promote continuity between individual industrial uses and compatibility with non-industrial uses. • Maintain standards for landscaping and screening to ensure adequate aesthetic controls. • Maintain adequate standards for buildings and signage design, site access, parking, maneuvering, loading, and structure setbacks. • Enforce standards for structure upkeep and site maintenance to ensure long-term aesthetic controls. • Revisit all established standards as appropriate. Chapter 9 1 Page 3 134 ' ' r low s 1w; VC r - % • 0 3 moi• ` r *.,: '`{ + r t► �� �4' enteryi.CCe 135 Centerville 2040 . CHAPTER 10: IMPLEMENTATION The implementation of the Comprehensive Plan does not end with adoption. The City's official controls, the zoning ordinance and subdivision regulations, will ensure day to day monitoring and enforcement of the policy plan. The regulatory provisions of both ordinances, as revised, will provide a means of managing development in the City in a manner consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The City's Capital Improvements Program will enable needed improvements identified in the plan to be programmed and implemented in a timely and cost effective manner. As part of the planning process, the City will evaluate its land use controls and consider amendments to existing ordinances which eliminate inconsistencies with the Comprehensive Plan, enhance performance standards, protect public and private investments, conform to mandatory State and Federal regulations and make it an understandable document. The plan identifies a number of specific changes to the zoning ordinance and subdivision regulations which need to be considered by the City which are outlined in Table 8-1. V 'd The Comprehensive Plan is intended to be general and flexible; however,formal amendments to the Plan will be required when land use elements, development staging or growth policies are revised. Periodically, the City should undertake a formal review of the plan to determine if amendments are needed to address changing factors or events in the community. While a plan amendment can be initiated at any time, the City should carefully consider the implications of the proposed changes before their adoption. When considering amendments to this plan, the City will use the following procedure: Chapter 10 1 Pagel 136 Centerville 2040 1. Amendments may be initiated by land owners, land developers, the Planning and Zoning Commission or the City Council. 2. The Planning and Zoning Commission will direct the City staff to prepare a thorough analysis of the proposed amendment. 3. The City staff will present to the Planning and Zoning Commission a report analyzing the proposed changes, including their findings and recommendations regarding the proposed plan amendment. 4. The Planning and Zoning Commission will decide whether or not to proceed with the proposed amendment. If a decision to proceed is made, a formal public hearing will be held on the proposed amendment. 5. Following the public hearing the Planning and Zoning Commission will make a recommendation to the City Council. 6. The City Council will receive the recommendation from the Planning and Zoning Commission and make a final decision on whether to adopt the amendment. 7. All amendments to the plan must be submitted to the Metropolitan Council for review prior to implementation. The City will annually update a five year capital improvements program which identifies major capital expenditures consistent with the Plan. The program includes public and private investments in infrastructure, park and trail development expenditures, infrastructure repair and replacement, building maintenance and repair and other planned capital expenditures. Like the Comprehensive Plan, the capital improvements planning process is ongoing and subject to modification, as appropriate. Chapter 10 1 Page 2 137 Centerville 2040 . Land Use Reconcile zoning designations with land 2019 Planning Commission use designations Updating Residential Zoning Code 2019 Planning Commission densities for conformance with the Comprehensive Plan Review of Downtown Design Guidelines 2020 Planning Commission Review commercial district provisions to 2020 Planning Commission/EDA clarify permitted uses that will enhance complimentary relationships of existing and new commercial areas. Amend the City's subdivision regulations 2020 Planning Commission to better protect natural resources and amenities, and provide for appropriate land dedication and funding for improvement of the City's parks stem. Update ordinance provisions which 2019 Planning Commission require connection to public sewer and water when available. Housing'' Review commercial district provisions to 2020 Planning Commission/EDA clarify permitted uses that will enhance complimentary relationships of existing and new commercial areas. Utilize local, regional, and federal tools Ongoing EDA/City Council identified in housing chapter to promote housing variety, availability, and affordability within the community. Transportation Sewer Water Supply Chapter 10 1 Page 3 138 Centerville 2040 Surface Water Parks/Trails Review and update 1989 Park and 2020 Parks and Recreation Pedestrian System Comprehensive Plan Commission Trail constructed from County Rd 54 TBD Parks and Recreation from southern border of the City to Commission Center Street Trail constructed along CSAH 21 TBD Parks and Recreation Centerville Road between the southern Commission city boundary and Dupre Road. Resilient Prepare and adopt solar ordinance. 2019 Planning Commission Economic Competitiveness Review Tax Increment Financing Policy 2019 EDA Identification of underutilized properties 2019 EDA for redevelopment. Chapter 10 1 Page 4 139 CITY OF CENTERVILLE REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION entervi(Ce E77 Agenda Item# Department: Requested Council Meeting Date: Administration/Finance June 13, 2018 TITLE OF ISSUE: Refuse/Recycling Services In-House Billing BACKGROUND AND SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION: Contained in the Refuse/Recycling RFP was that haulers include a provision for City billing versus hauler billing. With Republic Services, a slightly less than $17,000 savings would be passed through to residents if the billing was in-house. Staff has estimated that it would take approximately 60 hours of dedicated staff time to commence this billing processor approximately $2,100. Staff duties would increase with each sale of a home and arranging for services. However, staff currently receives a telephone call to cancel existing sewer/water services. Staff believes that in-house billing would streamline the delinquent utility/assessment process annually. COST AND SOURCE(S) OF FUNDING: General Fund with savings to residents. REQUESTED COUNCIL ACTION: Staff recommends in-house billing of these services. Billing would be included with municipal sewer/water billing. For Clerk's Use: SUPPORTED DOCUMENTS ATTACHED Motion By: Resolution Ordinance Contract Minutes Plan Map Second By: Vote Record: A e Nay King Other(specify) Love Paar Koski Montain Administration Department Use: Refer to: Consent Tabled Until: Regular Other: 140 CITY OF CENTERVILLE REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION entervi(Ce E77 Agenda Item# Department: Requested Council Meeting Date: Administration June 13, 2018 TITLE OF ISSUE: Waste Management Refuse& Recycling Contract Extension for One Month (July 31, 2018) BACKGROUND AND SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION: As Council is aware, the City and Republic Services are attempting to negotiate a contract for services for a five (5)year term. With ownership of receptacles and legal review of contract language have delayed this process. Legal Counsel and Beverly Mathiason, Republic Services both believe that this timing will be acceptable. COST AND SOURCE(S) OF FUNDING: N/A REQUESTED COUNCIL ACTION: Recommend Council approve the submitted Amendment to Refuse and Recycling Service Contract as submitted. For Clerk's Use: SUPPORTED DOCUMENTS ATTACHED Motion By: Resolution Ordinance Contract Minutes Plan Map Second By: Vote Record: A e Nay King Other(specify) Love Paar Koski Montain Administration Department Use: Refer to: Consent Tabled Until: Regular Other: 141 AMENDMENT TO REFUSE AND ECYCLING SERVICE COVITRAC.' .............. .......R....... ........... This amendment to the "REFUSE AND RECYCLING SERVICE CONTRAW entered into February 1, 2003 and extended on July 11,2012 and November 24, 2017, by and between Waste Management of Minnesota, Inc., ("Contractor")and the City of Centerville,a Minnesota municipal corporation ("City"), is for the purpose of extending the end date of the agreement. By mutual agreement between Contractor and the City,the current end date of June 30, 2018, shall be extended to July 31, 2018. All other terms and conditions of the existing "REFUSE AND RECYCLING SERVICE CONTRACT'that began February 1,20038 and the subsequent extensions shall remain in effect. WASTE MANAG EI EI T OF M I N N ESOTA, INC. .........----........................................ wwvxxx, DATE: Chuck Ryncla,Vice P, CITY OF CENTERVILLE ...................... .................................................. .......................... DATE: Jeff Poor, Mayor 142 CITY OF CENTERVILLE REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION entervi(Ce E77 Agenda Item# Department: Requested Council Meeting Date: Finance June 13, 2018 TITLE OF ISSUE: 2017 Audit Presentation BACKGROUND AND SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION: The city's auditing firm of Abdo, Eick& Meyers will be on hand to review their audit of the 2017 fiscal year. Attached is their summary, called the "Management Letter". A copy of the full, unabridged audit is available for review and bound copies will be handed out at the meeting. After adoption of the audit, it will be posted to the city's website and available for public review. COST AND SOURCE(S) OF FUNDING: Funds previously committed. REQUESTED COUNCIL ACTION: Motion to adopt the 2017 Audit as presented. For Clerk's Use: SUPPORTED DOCUMENTS ATTACHED Motion By: Resolution Ordinance Contract Minutes Plan Map Second By: Vote Record: A e Nay King Other(specify) Management Letter Love Paar Koski Montain Administration Department Use: Refer to: Consent Tabled Until: Regular Other: 143 Management Letter City ill Centerville, Minnesota For the Year Ended December 31, 2017 ABDO Beppk pi ME YEWS xxxxxx x LII Go i M-w 144 ABDO FICK & ...... June 8,2018 Management, orable Mayor and City Council it of Centerville, Minnesota We have audited the accompanying financial statements of the governmental activities, the business-type activities, each major fund and the aggregate remaining fund information of the City of Centerville, Minnesota(the City),for the year ended December 31, 2017. Professional standards require that we provide you with information about our responsibilities under generally accepted auditing standards,as well as certain information related to the planned scope and timing of our audEt.We have communicated such information in our letter to you dated October 31,2017. Professional standards also require that we communicate to you the following information related to our audit. Our Responsibility Under Auditing Standards Generally Accepted in the United States of America As stated in our engagement letter, our responsibility, as described by professional standards, is to express opinions about whether the financial statements prepared by management with your oversight are fairly presented, 'in all material respects, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Our audit of the financial statements does not relieve you or management of your responsibilities. Our responsibility is to plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable, but not absolute, assurance that the financial statements are free of material misstatement.As part of our audit,we considered the internal control over financial reporting of the City. Such considerations were solely for the purpose of determining our it procedures and not to provide any assurance concerning such internal control over financial reporting.We are responsible for earn rn unicating significant matters related to the audit that are, in our professional judgment, relevant to your responsibilities in overseeing the financial reporting process. However, we are not required to design procedures specifically to identify such matters. Significant Audit Findings In planning and performing our audit of the financial statements,we considered the Cityd Internal control over financial reporting(internal control)to determine the audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances fort purpose of expressing our opinions on the financial statements, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness oft City's internal control. Accordingly, we do not express an opinion on the effectiveness of the City's internal control. A deficiency in internal control exists when the design or operation of a control does not allow management or employees, in the normal course of performing their assigned functions,to prevent,or detect and correct, misstatements on a timely basis. A material weakness is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in intemal control,such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the entity's financial statements will not be prevented, or detected and corrected on a timely basis.A significant deficiency is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control that is less severe than a material weakness,yet important enough to merit attention by those charged with governance. Our consideration of internal control was for the limited purpose described in the first paragraph of this section and was not designed to identify all deficiencies in intemal control that might be material weaknesses or significantdeficiencies. Given these limitations,during our audit we did not identify any deficiencies in internal control that we consider to be material weaknesses. However, material weaknesses may exist that have not been identified. 6201 Eden Avenue,Wte 250 Et9na,MN 55438 2 9R,83SAW I Fax=,835,Ml 145 Compliance and her Matters As part of obtaining reasonable assurance about whether the City's financial statements are free of material misstatement,we performed tests of its compliance with certain provisions of laws, regulations,contracts,grant agreements, and other matters noncompliance with which could have a direct and material effect on the determination of financial statement amounts. However, providing an opinion on compliance with those provisions was not an objective of our audit.While our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion, it does not provide a legal determination on the City's compliance with those requirements.The results of our tests disclosed no instances of noncompliance or other matters that are required to be reported in accordance with Minnesota statutes. Qualitative Aspects of Accounting Practices Management is responsible for the selection and use of appropriate accounting policies.The significant accounting policies used by the City are described in Note 1 to the financial statements. No new accounting policies were adopted and the application of existing policies were not changed during the year ended December 31, 2017.We noted no transactions entered into by the City during the year for which there is a lack of authoritative guidance or consensus.All significant transactions have been recognized in the financial statements in the proper period. Accounting estimates are an integral part of the financial statements prepared by management and are based on management's knowledge and experience about past and current events and assumptions about future events. Certain accounting estimates are particularly sensitive because of their significance to the financial statements and because of the possibility that future events affecting them may differ significantly from those expected.The most sensitive estimates affecting the financial statements include depredation on capital,allocation of payroll expenses, other post-employment benefits and the liability for the Citys pensions, • Management's estimate of depreciation is based on estimated useful lives of the assets. Depreciation is calculated using the straight-line method. • Allocations of gross wages and payroll benefits are approved by City Council within the City's budget and are derived from each employee's estimated time to be spent servicing the respective functions of the City.These allocations are also used in allocating accrued compensated absences payable. • The City's liability for other post-employment benefits was estimated to be zero primarily based on the assumption that employees,whom participate in the health insurance plan,will retire after the age of 65 and not continue to participate in the plan following retirement. • Management's estimate of its pension liability is based on several factors including, but not limited to, anticipated investment return rate, retirement age for active employees, life expectancy, salary increases and form of annuity payment upon retirement We evaluated the key factors and assumptions used to develop these estimates in determining that they are reasonable in relation to the financial statements taken as a whole. The disclosures in the financial statements are neutral, consistent, and clear.Certain financial statement disclosures are particularly sensitive because of their significance to financial statement users. Difficulties Encountered in Performing the Audit We encountered no significant difficulties in dealing with management in performing and completing our audit. Corrected and Uncorrected Misstatements Professional standards require us to accumulate all known and likely misstatements identified during the audit, other than those that are clearly trivial, and communicate them to the appropriate level of management. Uncorrected misstatements of the financial statements related to the GASB 68 pension liability allocated to the City in relations its participation in PERA. Management has determined that their effects are immaterial, both individually and in the aggregate, to the financial statements taken as a whole. In addition, none of the misstatements detected as a result of audit procedures and corrected by management were material, either individually or in the aggregate,to each opinion unit's financial statements taken as a whole. tf+ CIF01119 Bevolmh", 3 \tuhlms 146 Disagreements with Management For purposes of this letter, professional standards define a disagreement with management as a financial accounting, reporting,or auditing matter,whether or not resolved to our satisfaction, that could be significant to the financial statements or the auditor's report.We are pleased to report that no such disagreements arose during the course of our audit. Management Representations We have requested certain representations from management that are included in the management representation letter dated June 8,2018. Management Consultations with Other Independent Accountants In some cases, management may decide to consult With other accountants about auditing and accounting matters. similar to obtaining a"second opinion"on certain situatin& If a consultation involves application of an accounting principle to the governmental unit's financial statements or a determination of the type of auditors opinion that may be expressed on those statements, our professional standards require the consulting accountant to check with us to determine that the consultant has all the relevant facts.To our knowledge, there saire no such consultations with other accountants. Other Matters We applied certain limited procedures to the required supplementary information (RSI) didanagement's Discussion and Analysis,the Schedule of Employers Shares of the Net Pension Liability and the Schedule of Employer's Contributions), which is information that supplements the basic financial statements.Our procedures consisted of inquiries of management regarding the methods of preparing the information and comparing the information for consistency with management's responses to our inquiries,the basic financial statements, and other knowledge we obtained during our audit of the basic financial statements.We did not audit the HSI and do not express an opinion or provide any assurance on the HSI. We were engaged to report on the supplementary information(combining and individual fund financial statements and schedules), is accompany the financial statements but are not I.With respect to this supplementary information, we made certain inquiries of management and evaluated the form, content,and methods of preparing the information to detennine that the information complies with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America,the method of preparing it has not changed from the prior period, and the information is appropriate and complete in relation to our it of the financial statements.We compared and reconciled the supplementary information to the underlying accounting records used to prepare the financial statements or to the financial statements themselves. We were not engaged to report on the introductory section which accompany the financial statements but is not RSL We did not audit or perform other procedures on this other information and we do not express an opinion or provide any assurance on it. Other Audit Findings or Issues We generally discuss a variety of matters, including the application of accounting principles and auditing standards,with management each year prior to retention as the City's auditors. However,these discussions occurred int normal course of our professional relationship and our responses were not a condition to our retention. BeA)j)1e +I'r;D(rSS, Gang Bevolulu., 4 Nutfibel-, 147 Financial Position and Results of Operations Our principal observations and recommendations are summarized on the following pages.These recommendations resulted from our observations made in connection with our audit of the Cily's financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2017. General Fund The General fund is used to account for resources traditionally associated with government,which are not required legally or by and principal management to be accounted for in another fund.The General fund balance increased $219,642 from 2016.The fund balance of$1,529,950 is 63.4 percent at the 2018 budgeted expenditures.We recommend that the fund balance be maintained at a level sufficient to fund operations until the major revenue sources are received in June, The City's fund balance policy for the General fund identifies a minimum unassigned fund balance of 40-50 percent of the following years budgeted expenditures.The City's ending fund balance is above this target level. The purposes and benefits of an adequate fund balance are as follows: * Expenditures are incurred somewhat evenly throughout the year. However, property tax and state aid revenues are not received until the second half of the year,An adequate fund balance will provide the cash flow required to finance the governmental fund expenditures. * Expenditures not anticipated at the time the annual budget was adopted may need immediate City Council action. These would include capital outlay replacement, lawsuits and other items.An adequate fund balance will provide the financing needed for such expenditures. * A strong fund balance will assist the City in obtaining, maintaining or improving its bond rating.The result will be better interest rates in future bond sales. Beople + Ili k >. GOIT 5 148 A table summarizing the General fund balances in relation to budgeted expenditures out follows: Percent Total General of Fund Fund Balance Budget Fund Balance to Year December 31 Year budget Budget 2013 $ 1,258,596 2014 $ 1,951,416 64,5 % 2014 1,319,013 2015 1,988,424 66.3 2015 1,169,065 2016 2,162,003 54.1 2016 1,310,308 2017 2,340,423 56.0 2017 1,529,950 2018 2,412,570 63.4 Fund Balances as a Percent of Next Year's Budget $3,000,000 $2,500,000 $2,000,000 $1,500,000 ........... ................. .......... ........ $1,000,000 $500,000 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 ---O--Actual Fund Balance Budget Rxyle +PrOWSS, Going Bevolah', 6 11 149 A summary of the 2017 operations is as follows, Original Final Budgeted Budgeted Actual Variance with Amounts Amounts Amounts Final Budget Revenues $ 2,630,423 $ 2,630,423 $ 2,799,648 $ 169,225 Expenditures 2,340,423 2,340,423 2,330,006 --- 10,417 Excess of Revenues Over Expenditures 290,000 290,000 469,642 179.642 Other Financing Uses Transfers out `29t}g96 299,0901 50,000 40,000 Net Change in Fund Balances 219,642 219,642 Fund Balances,January 1 1,310,308 1,310,308 1,310,308 - Fund Balances, December 31 $ 1,310,308 1X19308 1 529950 219642 * Total revenue had a positive budget variance of$169.225.The following areas experienced the most significant variances: o License and permits were over budget of$226,195. o State Fire Aid was$109,800 under budget. o Refunds and reimbursements were$27,960 over budget,mostly due to reimbursements of engineering costs. * Total expenditures had a variance under budget of$10,417,The following areas experienced the most significant variances: * Fire protection services were$108,800 under budget, due to less than expected remittance of fire aid to the relief association. * General Government capital outlay was$41,749 over budget, mostly due to the purchase of an electronic sign for City Hall. * Culture and recreation was over budget by$38,416. Mostly due to higher than expected costs for lawn mowing services and various other professional services. People, +I lrowss' ............................... ICHN 7rEAr 150 A more detailed comparison of General fund revenues for the past three years is as follows: Percent Per Source 2015 2016 2017 of Total �Ita Taxes $ 1,818,645 $ 1,990,860 $ 2,184,875 78.1 % $ 562 Licenses and Permits 134,781 216,569 350,995 12.5 89 Intergovernmental 273,604 295,825 191,582 6.8 48 Charges for Services 4,840 12,204 7,692 0.3 2 Fines and Forfeitures 22,230 24,042 18,068 Special Assessments - 786 - - Int r t Interest on Investments 13,279 10,764 5,291 02 1 Miscellaneous 35,177 31,934 41,145 i's 10 Total Revenues _j_2 302,556 I=L&82 984 99648 100.0 % $ 707 The sources of General fund revenues are presented graphically as follows: Revenues $2,500,000 $2,000,000 .......... ............. .......... $1,500,000 $1,000,000 $500�000 ........... ...... ............................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................... 2015 2016 2017 Taxes Licenses and Permits Intergovernmental Other 11.,ople, +116"0;„ COUP, klwfoa Id flu, 8 Nulfibel-, 151 A summary of the past three years General fund expenditures and transfers is as follows- Poor olloP r Percent Per Group Per Program 2015 2016 2017 of TOW apita Capita Current Gen government 433,610 437,379 469,667 19.0 124 146 Public safety 1,112,162 1,3 ,691 1,324,049 51.3 335 233 Public works 269,300 327S68 329,694 12.8 33 11 Culture and recreation 105,632 113,159 131,916 5.1 33 62 Economic davalopment 50 1,314 0.1 - 6 Miscellaneous 6,300 7,934 11,307 0,4 3 20 Total Current 1,94 ,004 2,190,361 2,266,257 88.7 575 557 Capital Outlay 7,500 860 41,7 1 29 Transfers out 496,000 250,000 250,000 9.7 63 Total Expenditures and Transfers 6 2>452,504 2,441,741 80 06160.0 652 616 The above chart compares the amount the City spends per capita, in comparison to a peer group. The peer group average is derived from information we requested from the Office of the State Auditor for Cities of the 41h class which have populations between 2,500 and 10,000. The function/program of the expenditures and transfers are presented graphically as follows: Expenditures ea Transform; $1,400,000 $1,200,000 $1,000,000 $800,000 $600,000 $400,000 $200,000 2015 2016 2017 BeopI B["volxlt#m 9 umber's 152 Special Revenue Funds Special revenue funds are used to account for revenue derived from specific taxes or other evinnarked revenue sources. They are usually required by statute or local ordinance to finance particular functions or activities of government.A summary of year end fund balances for all special revenue funds follows: Fund Balances December 31, Increase Fund 2017 2016 222LeaseJ_ Nonmajor Cable T.V. 46,672 $ _ 34 438 12234 Capital Projects Funds The capital projects funds are used to account for the acquisition and construction of major capital facilities other than those financed by enterprise funds.A summary of year end fund balances for all capital projects funds follows: Fund Balances December 31, Increase Fund 2017 2016 _J2ELease Major Park $ (1,142,304) $ (1,132,980) $ (9,324) Ikon ajar Pedestrian Trail Ways 12,377 12,288 89 Capital Equipment Revolving 168,473 109,562 48,911 2013 Street Project 203,183 {64,304} 267,487 Total _L_ara8 .2711Loa .4 75 341 =Lz=207,=163 The City should continue to annually evaluate the status of each project to determine if the fund should be closed or if additional funding sources will be needed fordeficits. A deficit indicates a funding shortfall and all will eventually need to be eliminated either by future charges or by transfers from other funds. Nople +Prywess, C10111gy BeV0101he 10 Nunfillovs 153 Debt Service Funds Debt Service funds are a type of governmental fund to account for the accumulation of resources for the payment of interest and principal on debt(other than enterprise fund debt). Debt Service funds may have one or a combination of the following revenue sources pledged to retire debt as follows: • EDRSEID taxes-Primarily for general City benefit pr ) is such as parks and municipal buildings. Property taxes may also be used to fund special assessment bonds which are not fully assessed. • Tax increments-Pledged exclusively for tax incrementfeconomic development districts. After the sale of bonds,the project may not produce revenue(tax increments or special assessments)for a period of one to two years. Bonds are issued with this timing difference considered in the form of capitalized interest. Special assessments-Charges to benefited properties for various improvements. In addition to the above pledged assets, other funding sources may be received by Debt Service funds as follows: • Residual project proceeds from the related capital projects fund • Investment earnings • State or federal grants • Transfers from other funds Peolk G1011119 154 comparison of the assets of each fund and the remaining sands outstanding at year end are asfollows: Cash and Temporary Total Bonds Fund Investments Assets Outstanding --MRLUu1- 309 Joint lis 2012A „ 2021 348 B.C. Improvement Refunding 2015A25,801 53,943 1,340000 2025 349 . l m provement Bonds1 A 241,601 ,11 2019 1 B.C. Improvement Bonds of 2009A/2016A 2,556,357 2,952,106 4,205,000 352 G.O. Improvement s of 2013A 82„012 231,174 1,485,000 2029 Total $ 2,971,209 3x730,120 7, 80,000 The following graph shows the next ten years of principal and interest payments from i service funds: $1,200,000 $1,000,000 $800,000 I I $60 0,000 E _i 00,000 I _ . $200,000 low $- 2018 20192022 2023 2024 2028 2028 2027 F_Principal ;Interest ogle I1V.. w , ,oirus rl 12 ei.littbere 155 Enterprise Funds Enterprise funds are used to account for operations that are financed and operated in a manner similar to private business enterprises-where the intent is that the costs of providing goods or services to the general public on a continuing basis be financed or recovered primarily through user charges.The results of the operations in terms of cash flows and the breakdown for the cash balances for the past four years are as follows: Water Fund Cash Flows $500,000 $500,000 $400,000 $300,000 $200,000 $100,000 a- b. ab vII NA, NA VWAP 'revixg slowess see goog 10 aas oNva", ess b IN 10\40 IPI ama"o e IPvPI avvg Op�raqirrg gos48 a Operating receipts 2014 2015 2016 2017 Due from Other Funds $ - -L—LO—O-000 JL==L00.,.0.00 ..1.00A0.0.0 Water Fund Cash Reserve Target $2,500,000 $2,000,000 ry $1.643.503 $1,500,000 $1.093.699 $1,000,000 $500,000 2014 2015 2016 2017 ............ :, '' ­�.... ........... . We recommend the City review rates annually to determine if operating revenues will cover operating costs and future projects. +I_Yomss, (1101110, N-mrx,Id ti", 13 VInAXIII, 156 Sewer Fund Cash Flows $500,000 50,000 $400,000 $350,000 $300,000 $250,000 $200,000 $150,000 $100,000 $50,000 t` �Q 90, 0 9 61 Na Ks to IF -401 see Iup so 05 Operating is ■Operating re -i.. . 2014 2015 2016 2017 Due from Other Funds =LL.1=8.6796jw= $ 1,261,595 $ 1,176,322 $ 1,193, Sewer Fund Cash Reserve Target $1,800,000 .:rc.:: $1,639,840 $1,600,000 $1,400,000 X1 $1,200,000 $1,217, 9 $1,000,000 $800,000 .1 $600,000 . $400,000 I- $200,000 2014 2015 2016 1 n st r i ct ad Minimu1 % of op e r a tin g cos We recommend the Citye t annually to determine if operating revenues will cover operating cos s and future rejects. Noph. ttt 1 Iit-J)rrd 11', 14 Nuthbeiv, 157 Storm Water Fund Cash Flows $120,000 $100,000 $80,000 $60,000 $40,000 $20,000 Mb *.a Mbadya�so 0 QDow 09 QN? ve say w6y e 0\ I wW , Roo Jos as% ' tsy OA 100" ION 10\41 2014 2015 2016 2017 Due to Other Funds _$ ...44.985 22660 $ for Water Fund Cash Reserve Target $250,000 $200,000 $2009 06 $162,713 $150,000 S125.112 $100,000 U8 787 $50,000 2014 2015 2016 2017 mas U nre stricted We recommend the City review rates annually to determine if operating revenues will cover operating costs and future projects. 11�crple +I Yow'-'s ---------——----- CP BevoIxIIII, 15 Nlldlllxrs 158 Ratio Analysis The following captures a few ratios from the City's financial statements that give some additional information for trend and peer group analysis. The peer group average is derived from information we requested from the Office of the State Auditor. Different peer group averages were used for Cities of the 4th class(population 2,500- 10,000). The majority of these ratios facilitate the use of economic resources focus and accrual basis of accounting at the government-wide level. A combination of liquidity(ability to pay its most immediate obligations),solvency(ability to pay its long-term obligations), funding(comparison of financial amounts and economic indicators to measure changes in financial capacity over time) and common-size(comparison of financial data with other cities regardless of size)ratios are shown below. Ratio calculation Source 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Debt to Assets Total liabilities/total assets Government-wide 3i 510 29% 2TN- 34% Debt Per Capita Bonded debYpopulation Government-wide ...... Taxes Per Capita Tax revenuestpopulation Government4de -4,51E, *I' I EJ-PJ I 0 x. 6 Current Expenditures Per Capita Governmental fund current Govenninental funds expenditures/population . .. ... NIA Capital Expenditures Per Capita Governmental fund capital Governmental funds i ,') -15 '2'E. .2 21Ii W expenditurestpopulation A Capital Assets%Left to Net capital assets/ Government-wide Depreciate-Governmental gross capital assets 61% fWA Capital Assets%Left to Net capital assetst Government-wide rg% 544 Depredate-Business-type gross capital assets IVfA + ImWSS, th, 16 Ninfibeis 159 Debt-to-Assets Leverage Ratio(Solvency Ratio) The debt-to-assets leverage ratio is a comparison of a city's total liabilities to its total assets or the percentage of total assets that are provided by creditors. It indicates the degree to which the City's assets are financed through borrowings and other long-term obligations(i.e.a ratio of 50 percent would indicate half of the assets are financed with outstanding debt). Bonded Debt per Capita(Funding Ratio) This dollar amount is arrived at by dividing the total Derided debt by the population of the city and represents the amount of bonded debt obligation for each citizen of the city at the end of the year.The higher the amount,the more resources are needed in the future to retire the obligations through taxes,assessments or user fees. Taxes per Capita(Funding Ratio) This dollar amount is arrived at by dividing the total tax revenues by the population of the city and represents the amount of taxes for each citizen of the city for the year.The higher this amount is,the more reliant the city is on taxes to fund its operations. Current Expenditures per Capita(Funding Ratio) This dollar amount is arrived at by dividing the total current governmental expenditures by the population of the City and represents the amount of governmental expenditure for each citizen of the City during the year. Since this is generally based on ongoing expenditures,we would expect consistent annual per capita results. Capital Expenditures per Capita(Funding Ratio) This dollar amount is arrived at by dividing the total governmental capital outlay expenditures by the population of the City and represents the amount of capital expenditure for each citizen of the City during the year. Since projects are not always recurring,the per capita amount will fluctuate from year tu,year. Capital Assets Percentage(Common-size Ratio) This percentage represents the percent of governmental or business-type capital assets that are left to be depreciated. The lower this percentage,the older the city's capital assets are and may need major repairs or replacements in the near future.A higher percentage may indicate newer assets being constructed or purchased and may coincide with higher debt robes or bonded debt per capita. Nople + GpIng Bevol)(111', 17 V11WHTS 160 Future Accounting Standard Changes The following Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB)Statements have been issued and may have an impact on future City financial statements:(1) GASH Statement No.75 - Accounting and Financial Reporting for Postemploft ment Benefit Plans Other then Pension Summary The primary objective of this Statement is to improve accounting one tin ancial reporting by state and local governments fors tempIcy ment benefits other than pensions(other postemployment benefits or OPES). It also improves inion-nation provided by state and local governmental employers about financial support for OPER that is provided by other entities. This Statement results from a comprehensive review of the effectiveness of existing standards of accounting and financial reporting for allpostemployment benefits(pensions and OPEB)with regard to providing decision-useful information, supporting assessments of accountability and interperiod equity, and creating additional transparency. This Statement replaces the requirements of Statements No. 45,Accounting and Financial Reporting by Employers for Postion pto Benefits Other than Pensions, as amended,and No. 57, OPEB Masan rem ants by Agent Em players a no Agent Multiple-Employer Plans,for APES. Statement No. 74, Financial Reporting for Prite mployment Benefit Plans Other than Pension Plans,establishes new accounting and financial reporting requirements for OPER plans. The scope of this Statement addresses accounting and financial reporting for OPEB that is provided to the employees of state and local governmental employers.This Statement establishes standards for recognizing and measuring liabilities, deferred outflows of resources. deferred inflows of resources, and expense/expenditures. For defined benefit OPER, this Statement identifies the methods and assumptions that are required to be used to project benefit payments, discount projected benefit payments to their actuarial present value,and attribute that present value to periods of employee service. Note disclosure and required supplementary information requirements about defined benefit OPEB also are addressed. In addition,this Statement details the recognition and disclosure requirements for employers with payables to defined benefit OPEB pInst t are administered through trusts that meet the specified criteria and for employers whose employees are provided with defined contribution OPEB.This Statement also addresses certain circumstances in which a non employer entity provides financial support for OPER of employees of another entity. In this Statement,distinctions are made regarding the particular requirements depending upon whether the OPEB plans through which the benefits are provided are administered through trusts that meet the following criteria- • Contributions from employers and non employer contributing entities to the OPEB,plan and earnings on those contributions are irrevocable. • OPEB plan assets are dedicated to providing OPES to plan members in accordance with the benefit terms. • OPEB plan assets are legally protected from the creditors of employers, nonemployer contributing entities,the OPEB plan administrator, and the plan members. Effective Date This Statement is effective for fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2017. Earlier application is encouraged. How the Changes in This Statement Will Improve Financial Reporting The requirements of this Statement will improve tedecision-usefulness of information in employer and governmental nae mployer contributing entity financial reports and will enhance its value for assessing accountability and interceded equity by requiring recognition of the entire APED liability and a more comprehensive measure of OPER expense. Decision-usefulness and accountability also will be enhanced through new not disclosures and required supplementary information,as follows: • More robust disclosures of assumptions will allow for better informed assessments of the reasonableness of OPEB measurements. PeoPle + 3ss Explanations of how and why the OPER liability changed from year to year Will improve C,ohlu transparency. r, 8 Bin 1'41]d I 1t 1 N"'tuf bers 161 Future Accounting Standard Changes(Continued) ■ The summary OPEC liability information, including ratios, will offer an indication of the extent to which the total OPER liability is covered by resources held by the OPEC plan, if any. For employers that provide benefits through OPEB plans that are administered through trusts that meet the specified criteria,the contribution schedules will provide measures to evaluate decisions related to contributions. The consistency, comparability, and transparency of the information reported by employers and governmental nonemployer contributing entities about OREB transactions will be improved by requiring: • The use of a discount rate that considers the availability of the OFFS plan's fiduciary net position associated with the OPEE of current active and inactive employees and the investment horizon of those resources, rather than utilizing only the long4erm expected rate of return regardless of whether the ORES plan's fiduciary net position is projected to be sufficient to make projected benefit payments and is expected to be invested using a strategy to achieve that return. • A single method of attributing the actuarial present value of projected benefit payments to periods of employee service, rather than allowing a choice among six methods with additional variations. • Immediate recognition in ORES expense, rather than a choice of recognition periods, of the effects of changes of benefit terms. • Recognition of OREB expense that incorporates deferred outflows of resources and deferred inflows of resources related to ORES over a defined,closed period, rather than a choice between an open or closed period. GASB Statement No.83- Certain Asset Retirement Obligations Summary This Statement addresses accounting and tinancial reporting for certain asset retirement obligations( R s),An ARO ss a legally enforceable liability associated with the retirement of a tangible capital asset.A government that has legal obligations to perform future asset retirement activities related to its tangible capital assets should recognize a liability based on the guidance in this Statement, This Statement establishes criteria for determining the timing and pattern of recognition of a liability and a corresponding deferred outflow of resources for Aly0s.This Statement requires that recognition occur when the liability is both incurred and reasonably estimable.The determination of when the liability is incurred should be based on the occurrence of external laws, regulations, contractie or courtjudgments,together with the occurrence of an internal event that obligates a government to perform asset retirement activities. Laws and regulations may require governments to take specific actions to retire certain tangible capital assets at the end of the useful lives of those capital assets,such as decommissioning nuclear reactors and dismantling and removing sewage treatment plants. Other obligations to retire tangible capital assets may arise from contracts or court judgments, Internal obligating events include the occurrence of contamination, placing into operation a tangible capital asset that is required to be refired, abandoning a tangible capital asset before it is placed into operation, or acquiring a tangible capital asset that has an existing ARO. This Statement requires the measurement of an ARO to be based on the best estimate of the current value of outlays expected to be incurred.The best estimate should include probability weighting of all potential outcomes,when such information is available or can be obtained at reasonable cost. If probability weighting is not feasible at reasonable cost, the most likely amount should be used. This Statement requires that a deferred outflow of resources associated with an ARO be measured at the amount of the corresponding liability upon initial measurement. This Statement requires the current value of a government's AROx to be adjusted for the effects of general inflation or deflation at least annually. In addition, it requires a government toevaluate all relevant factors at least annually to determine whether the effects of one or more of the factors are expected to significantly change the estimated asset retirement outlays.A government should remeasure an ARO only when the result of the evaluation indicates there is a significant change in the estimated outlays.The deferred outflows of resources should be reduced and recognized as outflows of resources(for example, as an expense)in a systematic and rational manner over the estimated useful life of the'llangible capital asset. 11opk,, +I Its ms's (�m01110 I it ]d t I 19 'Anilix-rs 162 Future Accounting Standard Changes(Continued) A government may have a minority share(less than 50 percent)of ownership interest in a jointly owned tangible capital asset in which a nongovernmental entity is the majority owner and reports Its AGO in accordance vifth the guidance of another recognized accounting standards setter.Additionally, a government may have a minority share of ownership interest in a jointly owned tangible capital asset in is no joint owner has a majority ownership, and a nongovernmental joint owner that has operational responsibility for the jointly owned tangible capital asset reports the associated AGO in accordance with the guidance of another recognized accounting standards setter. In both situations,the government!a minority share of an AGO should be reported using the measurement produced by the nongovernmental majority owner or the nongovernmental minority owner that has operational responsibility,without adjustment to conform to the liability measurement and recognition requirements of this Statement. In some cases, governments are legally required to provide funding oro r financial assurance for their performance of asset retirement activities. This Statement requires disclosure of how those funding and assurance requirements are in met by a government, as well as the amount of any assets restricted for payment of the government's AROs, If not separately displayed in the financial statements. This Statement also requires disclosure of information out the nature of a government's AROs,the methods and assumptions used for the estimates of the liabilities, and the estimated remaining useful life of the associated tangible capital assets. If an AGO(or portions thereof)has been incurred by a government but is not yet recognized because it is not reasonably estimable,the government is required to disclose that fact and the reasons therefor.This Statement requires similar disclosures for a government's minority shares of AROs. Effective Date The requirements of this Statement are effective for reporting periods beginning after June 15,2018. Earlier application is encouraged. How the Changes in This Statement illi Financial Reporting This Statement will enhance comparability of financial statements among governments by establishing uniform criteria for governments to recognize and measure certain AROs, including obligations that may not have been previously reported. This Statement also will enhance the decision-usefulness of the information provided to financial statement use by requiring disclosures related to those AROs. GAS S;Statement No.84-Fiduciary Activities Summary The objective of this Statement is to improve guidance regarding the identification of fiduciary activities for accounting and financial reporting purposes and how those activities should be reported. This Statement establishes criteria for identifying fiduciary activities of all state and local governments.The focus of the criteria generally is on(1)whether a government is controlling the assets of the fiduciary activity and(2)the beneficiaries with whom a fiduciary relationship exists. Separate criteria are included to identify fiduciary component units and postemployment benefit arrangements that are fiduciary activities. An activity meeting the criteria should be reported in a fiduciary fund int basic financial statements. Governments with activities meeting the criteria should present a statement of fiduciary net position and a statement of changes in fiduciary net position.An exception to that requirement is provided for a business-type activity that normally expects to hold custodial assets for three months or less. This Statement describes four fiduciary funds that should be reported, if applicable: (1)pension(and other employee benefit)trust funds,(2)investment trust funds, (3)private-purpose trust funds, and(4)custodial funds. Custodial funds generally should report fiduciary activities that are not held in a trust ore iv I nt arrangement that meets specific criteria. %ogle +I Yomss, GGilt( evolsiti., 20 Nulfiber'.; 163 Future Accounting Standard Changes(Continued) A fiduciary component unit,when reported in the fiduciary fund financial statements of a primary government,should combine its information with its component units that are fiduciary component units and aggregate that combined information with the primary government's fiduciary funds. This Statement also provides for recognition of a liability to the beneficiaries in a fiduciary fund when an event has occurred that compels the government to disburse fiduciary resources. Events that compel a government to disburse fiduciary resources occur when a demand for the resources has been made or when no further action,approval, or condition is required to be taken or met by the beneficiary to release the assets. Effective Date The requirements of this Statement are effective for reporting periods beginning after December 15,2018, Earlier application is encouraged. How the Changes in This Statement Will Improve Financial Reporting The requirements of this Statement will enhance consistency and comparability by(1)establishing specific offend for identifying activities that should be reported as fiduciary activities and (2)clarifying whether and how business-type activities should report their fiduciary activities. Greater consistency and comparability enhances the value provided by the information reported in financial statements for assessing government accountability and stewardship. GASH Statement No.85-Omnibus 2017 Summary The objective of this Statement is to address practice issues met have been identified during implementation and application of certain GASB Statements.This Statement addresses a variety of topics including issues related to blending component units, goodwill, fair value measurement and application, and postemployment benefits(pensions and other postemployment benefits[OPER]).Specifically,this Statement addresses the following topics: • Blending a component unit in circumstances in which the primary government is a business-type activity that reports in a single column for financial statement presentation • Reporting amounts previously reported as goodwill and'negative"goodwill • Classifying real estate held by insurance entities • Measuring certain money market investments and participating interest-earning investment contracts at amortized cost • Timing of the measurement of pension or OPEB liabilities and expenditures recognized in financial statements prepared using the current financial resources measurement focus • Recognizing on-behalf payments for pensions or OPER in employer financial statements • Presenting payroll-related measures in required supplementary information for purposes of reporting by OPER plans and employers that provide DEEB • Classifying employer-paid member contributions for OPEB • Simplifying certain aspects of the alternative measurement method for OPEB • Accounting and financial reporting for OPEN provided through certain multiple-employer defined benefit OPEI plans. Effective Date Deople Ther uirements of this Statement are effective for reporting periods beginning after June 15,2017 +I Vows,;., Earlier application is encouraged. 1101119 N-volvill". 21 Nuffilm" 164 Future Accounting Standard Changes(Continued) How the Changes in This Statement Will Improve Financial Reporting The requirements of this Statement will enhance consistency in the application of accounting and financial reporting requirements. Consistent reporting will improve the usefulness of information for users of state and local government financial statements, CASE Statement No.86- Certain Debt Extinguishment Issues Summary The primary objective ofthis Statement is to improve consistency in accounting and financial reporting for in-substance deferwance of debt by providing guidance for transactions in is cash and other monetary assets acquired with only existing resources-resources other than the proceeds of refunding debt-are placed in an irrevocable trust for the sole purpose of extinguishing debt.This Statement also improves accounting and financial reporting for prepaid insurance on debt that is extinguished and notes to financial statements for debt that is defeased in substance. Effective Date The requirements of this Statement are effective for reporting periods beginning after June 15,2017. Earlier application is encouraged. How the Changes in This Statement Will Improve Accounting and Financial Reporting The requirements of this Statement will Increase consistency in accounting and financial reporting for debt extinguishments by establishing uniform guidance for derecognizing debt that is defeased In substance, regardless of how cash and other monetary assets placed in an irrevocable trust for the purpose of extinguishing that debt were acquired. The requirements of this Statement also will enhance consistency in financial reporting of prepaid insurance related to debt that has been extinguished. In addition, this Statement will enhance the decision-usefulness of information in notes to financial statements regarding debt that has been defeased in substance. GASH Statement No.87-Leases Summary The objective of this Statement is to better meet the information needs of financial statement users by improving accounting and financial reporting for leases by governments. This Statement increases the usefulness of governments' financial statements by requiring recognition of certain lease assets and liabilities for leases that previously were classified as operating leases and recognized as inflows of resources or oufflows of resources based on the payment provisions of the contract. It establishes a single model for lease accounting based on the foundational principle that leases are financings of the right to use an underlying asset. Under this Statement, a lessee is required to recognize a lease liability and an intangible right-to-use lease asset, and a lessor is required to recognize a lease receivable and a deferred inflow of resources, thereby enhancing the relevance and consistency of information about governments' leasing activities. Effective Date and Transition The requirements of this Statement are effective for reporting periods beginning after December 16, 2019. Earlier application is encouraged. Leases should be recognized and measured using the facts and circumstances that exist at the beginning of the period of implementation(or, if applied to earlier periods, the beginning of the earliest period restated), However, lessors should not restate the assets underlying their existing sales-type or direct financing leases.Any residual assets for those leases become the carrying values of the underlying assets. 11�ople +I Younm 22 165 Future Accounting Standard Changes(Continued) How the Changes in This Statement Will Improve Accounting and Financial Reporting This Statement will increase the usefulness of governments'financial statements by requiring reporting of certain Move liabilities that currently are not reported. It will enhance comparability of financial statements among governments by requiring lessees and lessors to report leases under a single model.This Statement also Wil enhance the decision- usefulness of the information provided to financial statement users by requiring notes to financial statements related to the timing,significance, and purpose of a government's leasing arrangements. (1)Now. From GASH Pronouncements Summaries. Copyright 2017 by the Financial Accounting Foundation, 401 Merritt 7, Norwalk, CT 06856, USA, and is reproduced with permission. Restriction on Use This communication is intended solely for the information one use of the City Council, management and the Minnesota Office of the State Auditor and is not intended and should not be used by anyone other than those specified parties. Our audit would not necessarily disclose all weaknesses in the system because it was based on selected tests of the accounting records and related data.The comments and recommendations in the report are purely constructive in nature, and should be read in this context. If you have any questions or wish to discuss any of the items contained in this letter, please feel free to contact us at your convenience.We wish to thank you for the continued opportunity to be of service and for the courtesy and cooperation extended to us by your staff. 011�A 4"ILL? It ABDO, EICK&MEYERS, LLP Minneapolis, Minnesota June 8,2018 lleopk- + tx-ss 'oillg 23 111f,ben, N 166 167 CITY OF CENTERVILLE REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION entervi(Ce E77 Agenda Item# Department: Requested Council Meeting Date: Finance June 13, 2018 TITLE OF ISSUE: 2019 Budget Process BACKGROUND AND SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION: Due to the timing of brining a new Finance Director on board, staff has asked Abdo, Eick& Meyers (AEM) to provide a proposal for assisting with the 2019 Budget prepartion process. The attached proposal covers the initial development of the budget through the preliminary certification at the end of September. We feel that engaging AEM for this assistance will allow the new Finance Director time to familiarize themselves with the city's financial systems, policies and practices, before being expected to lead a budgeting process on a tight timeline. COST AND SOURCE(S) OF FUNDING: $7,300 - General Fund REQUESTED COUNCIL ACTION: Motion to approve the proposal from AEM for budget preparation services. For Clerk's Use: SUPPORTED DOCUMENTS ATTACHED Motion By: Resolution Ordinance Contract Minutes Plan Map Second By: Vote Record: A e Nay King Other(specify) Proposal Love Paar Koski Montain Administration Department Use: Refer to: Consent Tabled Until: Regular Other: 168 Proposal City of Centerville Centerville, Minnesota Submitted June 1, 2018 AEM Financial Solutions,LLC Grandview Square 5201 Eden Avenue, Suite 250 Edina, Minnesota 55436 952.835.9090 Contact Person Jean D. McGann, CPA 952.715.3059 jean.mcgann@aemfinancialsolutions.com ABDO EICK Mn E 1 E j7�'R C People US T,T.P +R-ocess' G011l�� AEM Financial Solutions"' 13ey(ld,,,(. 169 NLL[iA)crs TABLE OF CONTENTS Letter of Transmittal 2 Welcome to ABDO, EICK & MEYERS, LLP 3 Firm Qualification and Experience Governmental Client Services 4 Personnel 4 Agreement for Financial Services 5 Scope of Services 8 Similar Engagements with Other Governmental Entities 9 Agreement for the Provision of Professional Services 10 Appendix A Professional Biographies 170 ABDO EICK & 1 E S I.I.I' AEM Financial Solutions" LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL Mark Statz, City Administrator City of Centerville 1880 Main Street Centerville, Minnesota 55038 Dear Mark, Thank you for the opportunity to submit this proposal to the City of Centerville, Minnesota (the City)for budget development services. Based on our past experience with cities of comparable size and complexity, we believe our structured contract with defined outcomes offered through AEM Financial Solutions, LLC (AEMFS)would provide the City with excellent budget development services. We believe our solution will continue to result in the City receiving high level information, continual improvement of processes and allow the City to keep overall costs stable. Our proposal is based on the past work we have done,the needs of the City, and the experiences we have had working with other cities. The proposal outlines the scope of services we believe will address the needs of the City The term of this contract shall be from June 11, 2018 through September 30, 2018. An AEMFS representative will be in the City offices as necessary to perform responsibilities as noted on the Scope of Services page. Services will also be performed remotely as necessary. Investment by the City for services is indicated in the financial page. AEMFS would like to thank the City for the opportunity.We look forward to exceeding your expectations and continuing our long-term, mutually beneficial relationship. Sincerely, AEM Financial Solutions, LLC an Abdo, Eick&Meyers, LLPCompany 7—) ` Jean D`. McGann, CPA President, AEM Financial Solutions, LLC Partner,Abdo, Eick&Meyers, LLP 5201 Eden Avenue,Suite 250 Edina.MN 55436 952.715.3070 1 Fax 952.835.3251 71 Welcome to ABDO, EICK & MEYERS, LLP "The investments into our People and Process Make aPeople difference for you, our valued client. We focus on the challenges and needs that are relevant to your business or +Wocess government agency. This allows us to be thoughtful in our approach in providing you with the best solutions, and leaves you assured in the value of our deliverable." 1119 Beyondthe Steve McDonald -Managing Partner Numbers Hire Train Reward We focus recruiting efforts on We've invested in a state-of-the-art, We focus on client results and reward Minnesota state colleges and on-site training facility and a full-time our team based on specific goals, not universities. Innovative recruiting Learning Director to ensure our team hours billed. strategies, including a strong social is prepared to exceed your media presence, allow us to attract expectations. top talent. "tom I � 1 Listen Engage Deliver Our process begins with listening. Active engagement with DFK Combing our internal expertise and We invest time to better understand your goals and challenges. International and domestic industry technological resources with what associations allows us to provide we've learned about you allows us to maximum value to your organization. deliver a solution that exceeds your expectations. I 17Mr 1 I N T E R N A T 1 0 N A L I U S A GoingBeyond the Numbers 1-72 FIRM QUALIFICATIONS AND EXPERIENCE For over 50 years, we've helped local governments throughout Minnesota serve their communities more efficiently.As the leading governmental auditing firm in the state, we provide accounting, financial, and audit services to over 200 governmental entities. In 2009, we established AEM Financial Solutions, LLC (AEMFS)a company dedicated to providing day-to-day accounting and financial management services for local governments. The success of AEMFS stems from having over 17 years of government finance and audit experience, six years of Big Four accounting Firm, and over 50 years of providing governmental services in Minnesota. As an integral part of your team, we work with you to deliver one-of-a-kind solutions for improving best practices in your entire organization. You can expect to work with our partners and managers to resolve issues ranging from operational effectiveness to long term planning and workflow. AEMFS is a division of Abdo, Eick&Meyers, LLP(the Firm). Overall the Firm has a professional staff of more than 160 in its Edina and Mankato offices. AEMFS specializes in the governmental industry. The following summarizes the type of services we provide. Governmental Client Services Our governmental client base is composed of cities, municipalities and other public entities. They are as follows: • Finance director services for approximately 18 cities. 0 3 municipal clients receive the GFOA's certificate of achievement for excellence in financial reporting • Process evaluation studies and recommendations • Operational effectiveness • Work flow implementation • Request for proposal development • Project feasibility analysis • Rate studies, long term strategic planning and capital improvement planning • Budget development and analysis Personnel AEMFS has a tremendous level of expertise and experience in providing Governmental services. Detailed biographies can be found in Appendix A. This detail will demonstrate that when combined, we have over 55 years of providing solutions to governmental entities along with over 25 years of private sector experience. Our substantial governmental client base and commitment of staff to governmental services has provided our firm with the competence to serve your professionally and efficiently. 35 30 18 25 20 7 15 10 17 13 5 6151� 0 Partners/ Managers/ Accounting Support Staff Total Presidents Supervisors Staff ,01 Non-CPA ii CPA People ple 1- 3 AGREEMENT FOR FINANCIAL SERVICES THIS AGREEMENT, is made and entered into on June 1, 2018 DATE by and between the City of Centerville, Minnesota (hereinafter referred to as the"City"), and AEM Financial Solutions LLC(hereinafter referred to as the"Contractor"). Articles of Agreement& Recitals WHEREAS, the City is authorized and empowered to secure from time to time certain professional services through contracts with qualified consultants; and WHEREAS, the Contractor understands and agrees that: 1. The Contractor will act as an Independent Contractor in the performance of all duties under this Agreement. Accordingly,the Contractor shall be responsible for payment of all taxes, including federal, state and local taxes and professional/business license fees arising out of the Contractor's activities; 2. The Contractor shall have no authority to bind the City for the performance of any services or to obligate the City. The Contractor is not an agent, servant, or employee of the City and shall not make any such representations or hold himself/herself out as such; 3. The Contractor shall be the exclusive outsourced accounting service provider for the City during the term of this Agreement; 4. The Contractor shall perform all professional services in a competent and professional manner, acting in the best interests of the City at all times. 5. The Contractor shall not accrue any continuing contract rights for the services performed under this contract. NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and promises contained herein, it is agreed as follows: ARTICLE I INCORPORATION OF RECITALS The recitals and agreement set forth above are hereby incorporated into this Agreement. ARTICLE II LIABILITY INSURANCE Section 1 Liability Insurance: The Contractor shall obtain professional liability insurance, at their expense with liability insurance coverage minimums in the amount of$2,000,000, which Contractor must secure and maintain during the term of this Agreement. Contractor will provide City with proof of liability insurance coverage under this Agreement in writing upon request by the City. People ple +Process 1-74 AGREEMENT FOR FINANCIAL SERVICES- CONTINUED ARTICLE III DURATION OF THE AGREEMENT Section 1 Duration: This Agreement shall commence upon date of execution by all parties and will remain in effect until September 30, 2018 unless earlier terminated as provided in Sections 2 and 3. Section 2 City's Termination Rights: City may terminate this Agreement upon thirty(30)days written notice in the event the City determines in its sole discretion that it is not in the City's best interest to continue using Contractor's services. The City may terminate on ten (10)days written notice of the Contractor fails to perform its obligations under this Agreement. Section 3 Contractor's Termination Rights: Contractor may terminate this Agreement upon thirty(30)days written notice to City in the event City does not pay Contractor compensation as required under Article 5, Section 9 within fifteen (15)days after invoice is received by City. In the event of non-payment within thirty(30)days, Contractor shall give City an opportunity to cure the default by giving a notice of such non-payment and an additional five (5)days after the City's receipt of the notice to remit such payment, prior to giving a notice of termination. Contractor can also terminate the Agreement with thirty(30)days written notice if the Contractor believes it is in its best interests to terminate the Agreement. ARTICLE IV RENEWAL OF THE AGREEMENT Section 1 Renewal Period: Not less than thirty(30)days prior to the expiration of this Agreement,the City may provide written notice of intent to renew this Agreement for an additional term of up to three years upon terms and conditions agreed upon by both parties to the Agreement. If no such renewal agreement is executed by the parties, the Agreement terminates without further action of either party on September 30, 2018. ARTICLE V GENERAL Section 1 Authorized City Agent: The City's authorized agent for the purpose of administration of this Agreement is the City Administrator. Said agent shall have final authority for approval and acceptance of the Contractor's services performed under this Agreement and shall further have responsibility for administration of the terms and conditions of this Agreement. All notices under this Agreement shall be sent to the person and address indicated below on the signature lines. Section 2 Amendments: No amendments or variations of the terms and conditions of this Agreement shall be valid unless in writing and signed by the parties. Section 3 Assignability: The Contractor's rights and obligations under this Agreement are not assignable or transferable. Section 4 Data: Any data or materials, including, but not limited to, reports, studies, photographs, negatives, or any and all other documents prepared by the Contractor or its outside consultants in the performance of the Contractor's obligations under this Agreement shall be the exclusive property of the City, and any such data and materials shall be remitted to the City by the Contractor upon completion, expiration, or termination of this Agreement. Further, any such data and materials shall be treated and maintained by the Contractor and its outside consultants in accordance with applicable federal, state and local. Further, Contractor will have access to data collected or maintained by the City to the extent necessary to perform Contractor's obligations under this Agreement. Contractor agrees to maintain all data obtained from the City in the same manner as the City is required under the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act, Minnesota Statutes Chapter 13 or other applicable law(hereinafter referred to as the"Act"). Contractor will not release or disclose the contents of data classified as not public to any person except at the written direction of the City. Upon receipt of a request to obtain and/or review data as defined in the Act, Contractor will immediately notify the City. The City shall provide written direction to Contractor regarding the request within a reasonable time, not to exceed fifteen (15)days. The City agrees to indemnify, hold harmless and defend Contractor for any liability, expense, cost, damages, claim, and action, including attorneys'fees, arising out of or related to Contractor's complying with the City's direction. Subject to the aforementioned, Contractor agrees to defend and indemnify the City from any claim, liability, damage or loss asserted against the City as a result of Contractor's failure to comply with the requirements of the Act. Upon termination and/or completion of this Agreement, Contractor agrees to return all data to the City, as requested by the City. People ple +Process 17-5 AGREEMENT FOR FINANCIAL SERVICES- CONTINUED ARTICLE V-CONTINUED GENERAL-CONTINUED Section 5 Entire Agreement: This Agreement is the entire agreement between the City and the Contractor and it supersedes all prior written or oral agreements. There are no other covenants, promises, undertakings, or understandings outside of this Agreement other than those specifically set forth. Any term, condition, prior course of dealing, course of performance, usage of trade, understanding, or agreement purporting to modify, vary, supplement, or explain any provision of this Agreement is null and void and of no effect unless in writing and signed by representatives of both parties authorized to amend this Agreement. Section 6 Severability: All terms and covenants contained in this Agreement are severable. In the event any provision of this Agreement shall be held invalid by any court of competent jurisdiction, this Agreement shall be interpreted as if such invalid terms or covenants were not contained herein and such holding shall not invalidate or render unenforceable any other provision hereof. Section 7 Contractor Fiscal Decision Waiver: Contractor is responsible for providing the City with timely and accurate financial recommendations and information that allows City Council the ability to make final financial decisions. Contractor will provide final financial recommendations, but is not responsible for the final decisions made regarding financial matters. Section 8 City Employment of Contractors Employees; Should the City desire to employ the Contractors employee that is assigned to the City during the term of this Agreement, it must have the written consent of the Contractor to enter into a City employee contract with the Contractors employee. Should the Contractor agree to such arrangement, the agreement will include a payment equal to 50%of the annual contracted cost, in addition to the annual contracted cost already paid to the Contractor. This restriction on employment applies only during the term of this agreement. Section 9 Compensation: The parties agree that the Contractor shall be paid compensation for the services provided hereunder, payable for work performed in accordance with this Agreement, based on the fees indicated in Table 1 and under the attached scope of services. Additional fees will not be incurred without prior approval of the City. Table 1 Services Period Fixed Fee June 11, 2018—September 11, 2018 $ 7,300 An invoice for 50%of the project cost will be sent within 10 days of the execution of this agreement, with the remainder due upon completion of the project. Section 10 Additional Services: Should the City request additional services in addition to the Contracted Services, the Contractor will provide the City with proposed fees for the services to be provided. The City shall provide a written or electronic confirmation prior to the proposed services implementation. Section 11 Outside Contractors: It shall be the responsibility of Contractor to compensate any other outside consultants retained or hired by Contractor to fulfill their obligations under this Agreement and shall be responsible for their work and Contractor, by using outside contractors, shall not be relieved of its obligations under this Agreement. People ple 17$ SCOPE OF SERVICES City Planned Time AEMFS Responsibility Responsibility Frame 1. Annual Budget Preparation Attend preliminary meeting with City management on budget objectives and strategy July 15 Assist City Administrator in preparing a City management's recommended Provide direction, review property tax levy along with a general outline of the City Budgeted funds and approve compiled including any potential budget funding gaps. This will include the all funds information. Make all summary and preparation of all budget documents management decisions. July -August Provide input to AEMFS Attend two budget worksessions to discuss budget with Council and direction to Council Assist in presenting preliminary budget to Council prior to September 30. Provide input and direction August Assist in the certification of the preliminary property tax levy to the County and Minnesota Department of Revenue Review and approve September 30 People +1'rocc s", 17 SIMILAR ENGAGEMENTS WITH OTHER GOVERNMENTAL ENTITIES We have long-term relationships with many cities in Minnesota and have provided a sample of references of those we serve as their Finance Director. Additional references are available upon request. City of New Hope Kirk McDonald 1763.531.5112 Engagement Partner—Jean McGann City of Forest Lake Dan Undem 1651.209.9727 Engagement Partner-Jean McGann City of Le Sueu'r Jasper Kruggel 1507.665.6401 Engagement Partner-Jean McGann City of Oak Grove Loren Wickham 1763.404.7075 Engagement Partner-Jean McGann City of Crystal' Anne Norris 1763.531.1140 Engagement Partner-Jean McGann People ple 17$ AGREEMENT FOR THE PROVISION OF PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CITY OF SAMPLE, MINNESOTA WHEREFORE, this Agreement was entered into on the date set forth below and the undersigned, by execution hereof, represent that they are authorized to enter into this Agreement on behalf of the respective parties and state that this Agreement has been read by them and that the undersigned understand and fully agree to each, all and every provision hereof, and hereby, acknowledge receipt of a copy hereof. City of Centerville 1880 Main Street Centerville, Minnesota 55038 Name Title Name Title Date AEM Financial Solutions, LLC 5201 Eden Ave. Suite 250 Edina, Minnesota 55436 �p►s1�. ��t�r�.,r� Name Title President and Partner Date June 1, 2018 People ple +Process 179 Appendix People 180 \Ilrilhcl-� t Mrs. McGann joined the Firm in 2013. Partner, Abdo, Eick & Meyers, LLP She is licensed to practice as a CPA in Minnesota. Jean leads the Financial President, AEM Financial Solutions, LLC Solutions group providing financial management services, day-to-day Direct line 952.715.3059 accounting and customized solutions for jean.mcgann@aemfinancialsolutions.com local governments, nonprofit agencies and professional service firms. Qualifications • 19 years of experience in government finance and auditing When she's not contributing her time or 0 Over 7 years of experience in operations management expertise, Jean can be found spending • Highly skilled in strategic planning and financial forecasting time with family and friends, biking and • Experienced in identifying and implementing cost containment processes, reading. She resides in the Twin Cities efficiencies and streamlining processes with her husband and their children. • Policy development, internal control evaluation and project management experience • MSRB Municipal Advisor Qualified Representative (Series 50) • Mentor for the Business Program at the Minnesota Center for Advanced Professional Studies(MNCAPS) Professional Memberships • American Institute of Certified Public Accountants(AICPA) • Minnesota Society of Certified Public Accountants • Minnesota Government Finance Officers Association • Government Finance Officers Association of the United States and Canada Education • Bachelor of Arts, Buena Vista University, Storm Lake, Iowa • Continuing professional education as required by AICPA and Government Accountability Office ABDO EICK & AEM Financial SolutionsT'" 'h»9 �,rrirlx•r•� 1 t Victoria Holthaus, CPA Ms. Holthaus joined the firm in 2013. Client Services Manager Her past experience includes service to Minnesota municipalities and joint Direct line 952.715.3069 victoria.holthaus@aemfinancialsolutions.com ventures where she held finance and administrative roles. Victoria is licensed to practice as a CPA in Minnesota. Ms. Qualifications Holthaus works for the Financial • 12 years of experience working with local governments in finance and Solutions group providing financial administration management services and customized • MSRB Municipal Advisor Qualified Representation (Series 50) solutions for local governments and • Experience with budgeting, capital planning and debt management nonprofit agencies. 0 Process evaluation and process improvement engagement lead Victoria resides in Central Minnesota Professional Memberships with her husband, two children and her • Government Finance Officers Association of the United States and Canada dog. Outside of work, Victoria enjoys • Minnesota Government Finance Officers Association watching her kids play soccer and • Minnesota Society of Certified Public Accountants planning her next road trip to visit the • American Institute of Certified Public Accountants(AICPA) national parks. Affiliations • Hamline School of Business,Accounting Board Member Education • Master of Arts in Public Administration, Hamline University • Bachelor of Science in Accounting, National American University • Minnesota Certified Municipal Clerk • Continuing professional education ABDO EICK & AEM Financial Solutions" 192 �,rrirlx r� Zachary joined the firm in 2016 after Client Services Senior Accountant having served as a governmental auditor for cities, school districts, and Direct line 952.715.3074 not-for-profits. He specializes in working zachary.doud@aemfinancialsolutions.com with cities and school districts for accounting and consulting needs Qualifications including audit preparation, financial • 4 years of experience working with local governments in finance and statement preparation, and accounting administration as a governmental auditor processes. Professional Memberships Zachary enjoys everything outdoors • Minnesota Society of Certified Public Accountants from four-wheeling to hunting to venturing through the BWCA with Education fishing poles in hand, all alongside his . Bachelor of Science in Accounting, University of Minnesota Duluth great group of friends. Before these . Bachelor of Business Administration in Finance, University of Minnesota passions are pursued, he makes sure to Duluth spend time with his beloved family. . Continuing professional education Zachary is an avid Minnesota sports fan. ABDO SICK DDCC People�EID6 l.l.l' +Procrs5. REM Financial Solutions"' IM �urirhrr• Hannah joined the firm in 2015 as an Client Services Senior Accountant intern. Upon completion of her internship and Bachelor's Degree she Direct line 952.939.3233 channah.gebhard@aemfinancialsolutions.com continued to grow her career at the Firm as an auditor specializing in Minnesota municipalities. In 2017, Hannah Qualifications transitioned into her current role • 3 years of experience assisting in audit preparation, performing audit services, providing financial management and preparing annual financial statements for local governments. services to local governments. Professional Memberships When not working, Hannah enjoys American Institute of Certified Public Accountants(AICPA) playing with her rambunctious yellow lab, training for the next race she is . Minnesota Society of Certified Public Accountants going to run in, and spending time with Education her family. • Bachelor of Science in Accounting, University of Wisconsin—River Falls o Graduated Summa Cum Laude • Continuing professional education ABDO SICK & l't�uF�lr. MEYE1 LTJ I'I,I) ['Glided Publir.lrrurrrtrrur.. R f:nr.vrllird[ 7{'1f111( ilig• 194 llllll1)l'1'S I z. Elizabeth joined the firm in 2017 as a Client Services Senior Accountant Client Services Accountant after working as an Accountant—Deputy Direct line 952.939.3215 Clerk. Elizabeth previously worked in liz.lindrud@aemfinancialsolutions.com the private sector with experience in the areas of payroll, accounts payable, Qualifications revenue budgeting, and expense 0 Experience in payroll and compensation, reporting, and local government auditing finance. When not working, Elizabeth enjoys • Works extensively with Accounts Payable, Payroll, and Budgeting. traveling and spending time with her professional Memberships husband and two daughters at the • Minnesota Government Finance Officers Association (MNGFOA) cabin. Education • Bachelor of Science in Business, St. Cloud State University • Master of Business Administration, St. Cloud State University • Continuing professional education ABDO SICK & l't�uF�lr. MEYE1 LTJ I'I,I) ['Glided Public.lrroufa[rau[.. $ f:namrfial[, 7{'1 f 111[ i li 'h»5 �1lrirlx'r CITY OF CENTERVILLE REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION entervi(Ce E77 Agenda Item# Department: Requested Council Meeting Date: Administration/Parks June 13, 2018 TITLE OF ISSUE: Fete des Lacs Budget BACKGROUND AND SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION: Information on previous years' expenditures, expenditures to date for 2018 and fund raising efforts will be shared at the meeting. All needed information was not available at the time of this report. COST AND SOURCE(S) OF FUNDING: General Fund - Community Events REQUESTED COUNCIL ACTION: Motion to approve revised budget for Community Events. For Clerk's Use: SUPPORTED DOCUMENTS ATTACHED Motion By: Resolution Ordinance Contract Minutes Plan Map Second By: Vote Record: A e Nay King Other(specify) None Love Paar Koski Montain Administration Department Use: Refer to: Consent Tabled Until: Regular Other: 186 Administrator/Engineer's Report enterVille June 13, 2018 +:.I�r7.7771 ADMINISTRATION Administrator Continuing Education and Skills Development Plan On June 6, Teresa and I visited a number of businesses and spoke with their owners, including: Rumble Industries, Vermeesh Auto, Luther Towing, and all the businesses in the mini malls on Main Street. We asked for donations to the festival, encouraged them to participate in the parade and discussed the formation of the EDA. Finally, we asked what the city could do to help them as a business owner. We got lots of good feedback and made some great connections. We will definitely be reaching out to more business owners in a similar way, in the near future. Social Media Presence Teresa is researching some services to archive our social media posts to be compliant with data practices act requests. We will bring that information forward at an upcoming meeting. Staff Meetings Our monthly staff meeting is scheduled for June 14tH Building Permits A steady flow of permits continues to come in around the one year anniversary of the storm. Audit Our auditing firm of Abdo, Eick& Meyers present the audit to Council at this meeting. Finance Director Position At the time of this report, interviews have been scheduled with four candidates for the Finance Director position. 2019 Budget Process Typically, the city kicks off its budget process in June, for the upcoming year. On this council agenda is a proposal from Abdo, Eick and Meyers for assisting the city with this process. STORMWATER/WETLAND Local Water Plan We have now received comments from Rice Creek Watershed District and Met Council, on our draft of the Local Water Plan. Stantec is formulating responses to the comments 187 and revising the plan as appropriate. Once changes are made and reviewed with the commenting agency, we will bring a final version back to the City Council for adoption. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT/PLANNING Comp Plan The draft Comprehensive Plan is on this week's agenda for approval prior to submitting to surrounding jurisdictions for review. A public hearing on the draft plan was held at the June 5, Planning and Zoning Commission. There were no comments from the public. Peltier Estates We have been in contact with the developer and have been working through final issues. They awaiting approval of their plans from Anoka County prior to beginning work. Ruffridge Johnson Construction has begun. Waterworks Site/DeFoe Property A Preliminary Plat was presented to the Planning and Zoning Commission at their June 5 meeting and a Public Hearing was held. Residents who spoke were generally in favor of the proposed development. Issues regarding driveway and utility connections along LaValle Drive are yet to be worked out. Once there is more clarity on these issues, the Preliminary Plat will come before Council. Erick Marshall Property A Concept Plan was presented to the Planning and Zoning Commission last month, showing up to 5 detached townhomes at the northwest end of LaValle Drive. There has been no further activity with this proposal. Fruth/Fischer Property A Concept Plan was presented to the Planning and Zoning Commission last month showing 32 single family homes. There has been no further activity with this proposal. Economic Development Authority The first EDA meeting is set for August 27 and the board members have been notified. General Development Activity City staff has fielded calls from roughly half a dozen realtors and others, regarding various sites in town this month. Inquiries ranged from high density residential, to retail, and industrial uses. Additionally, we are aware of at least two potential redevelopment plans. Obviously, all of these items are only possibilities at this point, but it certainly indicates a healthy market for development. 188 SEWER AND WATER Trailside Park Shoreline Restoration Work is complete. A pay request is on this week's agenda. Water Supply Plan After reaching out to the Department of Natural Resources, this week, and asking about the status of our Water Supply Plan, submitted 16 months ago, we received an email with the following statement: "You can expect a letter from the DNR that incorporates Met Council's comments next week. Centerville's plan was sent to DNR's Groundwater Technical Analysis Unit for a more in-depth review. We received that completed review in May 2018. We apologize for the lengthy review time, and appreciate your patience. " On June 8, we received their comments and are responding to them. The comments were minimal and a final version of the plan should be ready soon. PUBLIC WORKS/STREETS Summer Help Here's a list of some of the activities our seasonal staff have been involved with, under the direction of Tedd Peterson. 1. Gate valve exercising 2. Hydrant flushing 3. Repair halfpipe (skate park) 4. Trim trees (city wide/trails) 5. Gate valve repair 6. Hydrant repair 7. Street patching 8. Storm pond maintenance/inspection 9. Stop sign removal/replace 10. Manhole adjustments 11. Sanitary sewer flushing Public Works Technician Position New employee, James Huisenga will begin work on July 2, 2018. Lino Lakes LaMotte Neighborhood Street and Utility Reconstruction Bids for this project came in over budget. The city is looking for ways to reduce costs and rebid. Copier The public works copier has been installed and employees have been trained. 189 PARKS Dupre Artifacts After getting Council's go-ahead to purchase a large set of display cases, we went to view them in person and were a bit overwhelmed by their size, given the limited space in city hall for display. A single, smaller unit was settled on; call it a starter kit. It is now in Council Chambers. We will work with the Dupre family and other local historians to get a meaningful display in our new cabinet. FETE DES LACS The Fete des Lacs Committee has been meeting, the third Monday of each month and planning is well underway. The festival is set for July 17-22, 2018. The parade theme this year will be"Cougar Pride". The grand marshal of the parade is Kari Laterneu Facebook(@fetedeslacs) and web pages @ww.fetedeslacs.org) are now up and running. Fund raising is going well and sponsorships should reach roughly the same level as last year. PUBLIC SAFETY Centennial Fire District Remodeling at both stations is nearing completion. Centennial Lakes Police Department • A rash of petty thefts from automobiles was reported last week. The department is investigating and additional patrols have been arranged. 190 • A new officer was sworn in, and several lifesaving awards were handed out at the 191 Planning &'Zoning Commission Report and Recommendation. The Planning & Zoning,Commission lmet on January 7, 2014 to consider a request of Rehbein Properties, DBA Rehbein's Black Dirt, for an Interim Use Permit(IUP)to operate a black dirt processing business at 2'lst Avenue south of Clearwater Creek in the City of Centerville. Findings: 1) The Planning and Zoning Commission heard and considered all testimony of interested persons submitted in writing prior to and in person during the public hearing on November 5, 2013. 2) The proposed use may be operated in the I-1 zoning district subject to an Interim Use Permit with reasonable conditions. 3) Minnesota DNR offered comments that require a"No Rise Certificate" if the use is located in the Floodway. 4) The proposed use is not inconsistent with the Comprehensive Plan if allowed on a temporary basis until the planned use is(feasible. 5) The applicant is willing to conform to conditions in the draft Interim Use Permit attached hereto. RECOMMENDATION.' The Planning Commission finds that the standards for grantinga Interim Use Permit have been met and recommends that the City Council approve the Interim Use Permit, subject to the conditions contained in the draft]UP attached hereto. January 7. 2014 Planning and Zoning Commission Dallas Larson, Administrator 192 last Police Governing Board meeting! 193 r�ii W RICES EE TERSHED DISTRICT Notice of Annual Public Information Meeting is Creek Watershed District Storm Water Pollution Prevention Program MS4 (Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System) NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Annual Public Information Meeting on the District's Storm Water Pollution Prevention Program (SWPPP) will be held on Wednesday, June 27, 2018 during the is Creek Watershed District Board of Managers regular meeting at 9:00 AM in the Shoreview City all Council Chambers, 4600 North Victoria Street, Shoreview, Minnesota, The purpose of this meeting is to present the District's MS4 Annual Report and receive comments and respond to questions regarding the District's SWPPP. Interested parties will have an opportunity to provide oral or written input on the Best Management Practices (BIMPs) being utilized by the District. The District's SWPPP can be reviewed on the District's website www.ricecreek.org or a copy is available for review at the District office. For questions regarding the meeting, contact Lauren Sampedro, District Technician, at lsampedro@ricecreek.org or (763) 398-307& 4325 Pheasant Ridge Drive NE #6111 Blaine, MN 55449 1 T. 763-398-3070 1 F: 763-398-3088 1 www.ricecreek.org BOARD OF Michael J. Bradley Barbara A. Naake Patricia L. Preiner Steven P. Wagannon John J. Waller MANAGERS Ramsey County Ramsey County 1 94noka County Anoka County Washington County