HomeMy WebLinkAbout2019-06-12 CC Packet
1
2
2018
Audit
City of
Financial
Statement
Centerville
3
Draft
2
4
Other Governmental FundsOther Governmental Funds
Enterprise Funds
General Fund Results
Ratios
Audit Opinion and Responsibility
DraftDraftDraftDraftDraftDraftDraftDraftDraftDraftDraft
Introduction
3
5
Auditor’s OpinionMinnesota Legal Minnesota Legal Compliance
DraftDraftDraftDraftDraft
Audit Results
4
6
DraftDraftDraftDraftDraftDraftDraftDraftDraftDraftDraft
-
General Fund Fund Balances
5
7
DraftDraftDraftDraftDraftDraftDraftDraft
General Fund Budget to Actual
6
8
DraftDraftDraftDraftDraftDraftDraftDraftDraftDraftDraftDraftDraft
General Fund Revenues by Type
7
9
DraftDraftDraftDraftDraftDraftDraftDraftDraftDraftDraftDraftDraft
General Fund Expenditures by Type
8
10
DraftDraftDraftDraftDraft
Special Revenue Fund Balances Cable T.V.
9
11
DraftDraftDraftDraftDraftDraftDraftDraftDraftDraftDraftDraftDraftDraftDraftDraftDraft
Capital Projects Fund Balances ParkPedestrian Trail WaysCapital Equipment Revolving2013 Street Project
10
12
DraftDraftDraftDraftDraftDraftDraft
Debt Service Funds
11
13
DraftDraftDraftDraftDraftDraftDraftDraftDraftDraftDraftDraftDraftDraftDraftDraftDraftDraftDraftDraft
-
Water Fund Cash Flows from Operations and Cash Balances
12
14
DraftDraftDraftDraftDraftDraftDraftDraftDraftDraftDraftDraftDraftDraftDraftDraftDraftDraft
-
Sewer Fund Cash Flows from Operations and Cash Balances
13
15
DraftDraftDraftDraftDraftDraftDraftDraftDraftDraftDraftDraftDraftDraftDraftDraftDraftDraftDraft
-
Flows from
Storm Water Fund Cash Operations and Cash Balances
14
16
DraftDraftDraftDraftDraftDraftDraft
-
Garbage and Recycling Funds Cash Flows from Operations and Cash Balances
15
17
DraftDraftDraftDraftDraftDraftDraftDraft
Cash and Investments Balances by Fund Type
16
18
DraftDraftDraftDraftDraftDraftDraftDraftDraftDraftDraftDraftDraftDraftDraftDraftDraftDraftDraft
Key Ratios
17
19
DraftDraftDraftDraftDraftDraftDraftDraftDraftDraftDraft
Key Ratios
18
20
DraftDraftDraftDraftDraftDraftDraftDraftDraftDraftDraftDraftDraftDraftDraftDraftDraft
Key Ratios
19
21
DraftDraftDraftDraftDraftDraftDraftDraftDraftDraftDraft
Key Ratios
Tyler See
Jeff Hines
Audit TeamAudit Team
Brad FalteysekBrad Falteysek
Tomi McDonald
20
22
Sam Magureanu Sam Magureanu
Questions?
DraftDraftDraftDraft
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
CITY OF CENTERVILLE
REQUEST FOR
COUNCIL ACTION
Agenda Item # Department: Requested Council Meeting Date:
6/12/2019
Engineering
VII.4
TITLE OF ISSUE:
Soil Borings - Downtown Street & Utility Improvements
BACKGROUND AND SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION:
As we begin our exploration of a Downtown Street and Utility Improvements Project, our engineers will need
soils information for both street and utility construction. Attached is a quote from NTI to perform soil borings
in the project area. The city recently requested quotes from other firms for this type of work (on Block 7) and
NTI's pricing was considerably less than the others. Their pricing for this work is in line with the Block 7 work,
so we did not pursue a second quote. This work is considered professional services and the law does not
require a second quote.
COST AND SOURCE(S) OF FUNDING:
$4,750 - General Fund - Street Fund
REQUESTED COUNCIL ACTION:
Motion to approve proposal from NTI to perform soil borings for the Downtown Street and Utility
Improvements.
For ClerkÓs Use:
SUPPORTED DOCUMENTS ATTACHED
Motion By: ____________________________________
Resolution Ordinance Contract Minutes Plan Map
Second By: ____________________________________
Vote Record: Aye Nay
_____
_____
Proposal
Other (specify) ____________
_____ _____ Love
_____ _____ Paar
_______________________________________________________________
_____ _____ Koski
_____ _____ Montain _______________________________________________________________
Administration Department Use:
Refer to: _________________________________
Consent
Tabled Until: ______________________________
Regular
Other: ___________________________________
30
May 28, 2019
City of Centerville
Attention: Mark Statz, PE
1880 Main Street
Centerville, MN 55038
RE: Proposal for Geotechnical Services
Centerville Downtown Street and Utility Project
Centerville, Minnesota
NTI Proposal P9353
We are pleased to submit our proposal to perform Geotechnical Services for the above referenced project. The
purpose of this study is to collect representative soil samples, analyze the subsurface soil and groundwater
conditions and to furnish a detailed geotechnical engineering report with appropriate design and construction
recommendations.
The proposed project consists of improving several downtown streets within the City of Centerville, Minnesota.
The improvements consist of the installation of water main and storm sewer lines along with the reconstruction
of the asphalt surface.
SCOPE OF WORK
The following is our proposed work scope based on the request for proposal provided by the City of Centerville.
NTI assumes a representative of the City will mark the proposed borings. If requested, NTI can mark the
proposed borings at the general locations indicated within the request for proposal documents. We will make
you aware of these field activities before proceeding to the site to allow you the option to notify any pertinent
NTI will -
borings.
NTI will then mobilize a truck mounted drill to the site to drill 9 borings each to a depth of approximately 14.5
feet below existing grade. The total lineal feet of drilling proposed is 130.5 feet. Borings may be terminated
early if soil/bedrock conditions resulting in practical auger refusal are encountered prior to the proposed
termination depths.
31
Proposal for Geotechnical Services
Centerville Downtown Street & Utility Project
Centerville, Minnesota
NTI has assumed that there is reasonable access to the proposed borehole locations. This would include safe
working distances from utilities, removal of site obstructions that prohibit access to the proposed borehole
locations, etc.
Soil sampling in the borings will be performed at 2-1/2-foot intervals. Soil sampling will be performed in general
accordance with ASTM D 1586. A geotechnical engineer will visually classify field-collected samples in general
-value, relative density,
consistency and estimated compressive strength will be documented on soil boring logs.
We will measure for the presence of groundwater or lack thereof when we complete each soil boring. We will
backfill the soil borings with soil cuttings or high solids bentonite grout to comply with current Minnesota
Department of Health Regulations.
We will perform laboratory tests on selected soil samples, this may include:
1.Plastic/liquid limit tests on cohesive soils.
2.Moisture tests.
3.Gradations.
4.Organic content tests.
Upon completion of the field and laboratory work, a geotechnical engineering report will be prepared. The
report will include the logs of the borings, location drawing and the results of the field and laboratory tests. In
addition, the report will include our engineering opinions and recommendations regarding:
1.Site preparation and excavation recommendations.
2.Engineered fill and compaction recommendations.
3.Anticipation and management of groundwater for design and construction.
4.Potential construction difficulties regarding excavation and backfill.
5.Estimated R-Value for use in bituminous pavement design.
6.Recommended pavement design thickness.
engineered alternatives, review earthwork, groundwater control, and other civil plans and specifications as an
materials testing services once the project construction begins. This provides professional continuity of services
throughout the design and construction of the project.
32
Proposal for Geotechnical Services
Centerville Downtown Street & Utility Project
Centerville, Minnesota
DELIVERABLES
NTI will provide an electronic PDF copy of the final report to the client. Two bound hard copies are available
upon request.
COST
We will perform the base geotechnical exploration and report described above for a fixed fee of $4,750.
Additional services outside of the scope of services outlined above will be invoiced as shown below. NTI will
contact the design team for these additional services prior to commencement.
Additional Item Cost
Additional drilling on the same mobilization $22 per lineal foot
Additional Mobilizations $500 each
Post report consultation, in excess of 2 hours $125 per hour
Other services Per our standard fee schedule, less 10%
Our fees assume that the soil can be disposed of on site, such as by thin spreading near the borehole. Additional
fees may apply for handling the spoils or for containerizing (drumming) spoils. Environmental hazard testing may
be required for disposal to a landfill, if needed.
andard construction Personal Protective Equipment
(PPE), including hard hats, safety glasses, hearing protection and visibility equipment such as vests. If additional
PPE is required, such as for drilling in an environmentally contaminated area or in a confined space, additional
fees will apply.
SCHEDULE
Upon receiving authorization to proceed, the field work will typically begin in approximately 7 to 10 business
days and will take approximately 1 day to complete. The report will be issued to you within 7 to 10 business
days of completion of the field work. Boring logs and verbal information regarding our findings can be provided
within 2 to 3 days after the field work has been completed. NTI has the capacity to meet the propose timeline
laid out in the request for proposal documents.
33
Proposal for Geotechnical Services
Centerville Downtown Street & Utility Project
Centerville, Minnesota
ACCEPTANCE
Please indicate your acceptance of this proposal by signing on the signature block below and returning a copy to
us. The attached General Conditions are an integral part of this proposal. This proposal is effective until July 1,
2019
We thank you for the opportunity of submitting this proposal and look forward to working with you through
both the design and construction phase of this project. If you have any questions regarding this proposal, please
contact the undersigned at 763-433-9175.
NORTHERN TECHNOLOGIES, LLC
CITY OF CENTERVILLE
By:___________________________________
Ryan M. Benson, P.E.
Vice President
Printed Name:__________________________
Attachments: General Conditions
Title:_________________________________
Date:_________________________________
34
GENERAL TERMS & CONDITIONS
1.0CONTRACT
a.The foregoing Proposal and these General Terms and Conditions b.Client will immediately transmit to NTI any new information that
constitute the contract (hereinafter, "Contract") between Northern becomes available to Client or Client's contractors or subcontractors,
Technologies, LLC, (hereinafter, "NTI") and the party signing the so that recommended actions can be reviewed.
Client Authorization (hereinafter, "Client") c.Client will provide a representative to answer questions about the
b.If Client directs NTI to proceed with Services (as defined below) prior project when required by NTI upon 24-hour notice.
to execution of this Contract, or if Client allows NTI to continue with d.Client will not hold NTI liable for any incorrect advice, judgment, or
Services after having received this Contract, it is understood that decision based on any inaccurate information furnished by or on
each party is bound by the terms and conditions of this Contract behalf of Client, and Client will indemnify NTI against liability arising
whether or not Client has signed this Contract. out of or contributed to by such information.
2.0SERVICES e.NTI shall be entitled to additional compensation for all extra work
a.NTI will provide Client with the services specified in the Proposal caused by or resulting from the failure of the information provided
(hereinafter, "Services" or "Scope of Services") in accordance with to accurately describe the Site conditions.
the Contract's terms. Services enumerated in writing in the Contract f.With the exception of those speci
are considered Basic Services. Services not specifically enumerated Scope of Services, Client shall timely obtain all necessary permits,
in writing in the Contract are not included in the scope of NTI's governmental approvals and access agreements to allow NTI and its
Services and are not NTI's responsibility. agents access to the Site and any buildings thereon.
b.Should the need arise for NTI to expand our services in response to g.Client is responsible for notifying property owner(s) of the nature,
conditions or events outside our control, NTI would, under
direction, submit a separate proposal providing such Additional that may occur during the execution of said work.
Services. Additional Services are not included under Basic Services nor h.Client shall provide reasonable safe access to the proposed location
are they covered by the compensation for Basic Services. of work including but not limited to slopes, distance from unities,
c.NTI will provide Services to Client as an independent contractor and removal of site obstructions, etc.
5.0NTI RESPONSIBILITIES
d.NTI shall have no responsibility for the discovery, presence, handling, a.NTI will perform its Services consistent with the level of care and skill
removal or disposal of, or exposure of persons to, hazardous ordinarily exercised by members of the geotechnical and materials
materials or toxic substances in any form at the project site. If, while testing profession currently practicing under similar conditions (the
performing the Services any hazardous substances or conditions are "Standard of Care"). No warranty of any kind, expressed or implied,
discovered or encountered that pose unanticipated risks or costs, it is made by NTI.
is agreed that the scope of Services, time schedule and the b.NTI will be responsible for its data, interpretation and
estimated Contract costs shall be reconsidered and that this recommendations, but will not be responsible for interpretation by
Contract may, at NTI's option, be re-negotiated or terminated. If the others.
Contract is so terminated, Client shall pay NTI for the Services c.NTI will take reasonable precautions to prevent damage to property.
performed up to the date of termination plus NTI's reasonable However, unless specifically included in the Scope of Services NTI
termination and demobilization costs and expenses. will not be responsible for the repair or cost of repairs of property
e.If NTI's performance of the Services is delayed by Client or by any including but not limited to pavements, turf, walks, vegetation,
other circumstance beyond NTI's direct and reasonable control, then utilities, irrigation, buildings or any other site improvements.
the time for NTI's completion of the Services shall be automatically 6.0INSURANCE
extended based upon the duration and impact of each such delay a.
and NTI shall be entitled to additional compensation from Client property damage, and errors and omissions insurance policies, which
3.0GENERAL RESPONSIBILITIES NTI considers adequate. In addition to any other limitations set
a.NTI shall not be responsible for the performance of any activity or forth in this Contract, it is agreed that in no event will NTI be
obligation other than the Services specified in the Contract, and NTI's responsible for loss, damage or liability beyond the limits and
performance shall not be construed as relieving Client or any third conditions of NTI's available insurance. NTI will not be responsible
party of their responsibilities. NTI shall have no responsibility for, or for any loss or liability arising from the negligence of Client or by
any liability pertaining to: (1) the superintending, supervising, or other persons or entities employed by Client.
directing of the work of any independent contractor, agent or 7.0COMPENSATION
employee of Client or any third party; or (2) the results or a.e or an estimate based
consequences of work performed by any such independent on set rates. Unless specifically stated in the Proposal Client
contractor, agent or employee of Client or any third party; or (3) any acknowledges that the fee estimate will not be construed to be a
claims or allegations of rights by any person or party other than maximum or not to exceed amount.
Client relating to NTI's Services; or (4) for job site safety at the b.NTI will submit invoices to client monthly, and a final invoice upon
location which is the subject of this Contract (hereinafter, "Site"). completion of Services. Invoices will show charges based on current
b.NTI will be responsible for obtaining only those government permits, NTI Fee Schedule or other basis agreed upon in writing. A detailed
approvals and authorizations that are specified in the Scope of
Services of the Contract. NTI is not responsible for project delays, request.
s failure to issue said c.Client shall notify NTI immediately if there are any issues relatingto
permits in a timely fashion. the invoice format, amounts, name of responsible party or any other
c.Unless otherwise expressly agreed by NTI afactors preventing payment of the invoice as submitted.
performance of its Services is solely and exclusively for the benefit of d.
the Client and no party other than Client shall be entitled to rely subject to retainage.
upon any documentation, representation, report, statement or e.Unless specifically stated in the Proposal, payment of invoices for NTI
service made or performed by NTI. Services shall not be contingent upon project financing or payments
4.0CLIENT RESPONSIBILITIES received by the Client from other parties.
a.Client will make available to NTI all known information regarding f.The Client will pay the balance stated on the invoices unless Client
existing and proposed requirements which affects the work, notifies NTI in writing of the particular item that is alleged to be
including but not limited to: specifications, contracts, incorrect within fifteen (15) days from the invoice date. NTI will
recommendations, plans and change orders.
35
GENERAL TERMS & CONDITIONS
balance of the invoice is paid within the terms of this Contract. In like indemnity and limitationsof liability on their part as against NTI.
the event Client fails to bring a billinIn the event the Client fails to obtain a like limitation and indemnity,
within the 15-day period, Client waives the right to later dispute the Client agrees to indemnify NTI for any liability to any third party.
invoice. d.NTI shall have no liability for any failure to perform or delay in
g.Payment is due upon receipt of invoice and is considered past due performance due to any circumstances beyond its reasonable
thirty (30) days from invoice date. On past due accounts, Client will control. Additionally, in no event shall NTI be liable or responsible to
pay a late charge of 1.5(%) per month, or the maximum allowed by Client or any other person for any consequential, special, incidental,
law. exemplary, or punitive damages, including but not limited to,
h.In the event Client fails to pay NTI within sixty (60) days following governmental fines, penalties or liabilities, lost profits or other
invoice date, NTI may consider the default a total breach of this economic loss (whether arising from negligence, errors, omissions,
Contract and all duties of NTI under this Contract will be terminated. breach of contract, breach of warranty, tort, strict liability or
i.Partial payments received will first be applied to accrued late otherwise), resulting from any claimed defect or deficiency in the
charges, then expenses and then to the principal balance. Services provided by NTI or any failure by NTI to provide Services.
j.Client agrees that NTI may increase its billing rates/fees on each 11.0TERMINATION
anniversary of this Contract. a.This agreement may be terminated by either party upon seven (7)
8.0OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS / SAMPLES days written notice if there is substantial failure by the other party to
a.The Client acknowledges that the reports, data, plans, specifications, perform. Termination will not be effective if substantial failure is
representations, correspondence and all other documents remedied before expiration of the seven days. Upon termination,
prepared by NTI as part of its Services under this Contract other than for NTI's default, NTI will be paid for Services rendered
(collectively referred to as "Documentation") are instruments of plus reasonable termination expenses.
NTI's service to Client. Client agrees to save, defend, indemnify and b.If the Contract is terminated prior to completion of all reports
hold NTI and its officers, directors, shareholders, employees and contemplated by the agreement, or suspended for more than three
agents harmless from and against all claims, damages, losses and (3) months, NTI may complete analysis and records as are necessary
related expenses (including, without limitation, all reasonable to complete its files and may complete a report on the Services
attorney fees, disbursements, expert witness fees and all costs of performed. Termination or suspension expenses will include direct
court and litigation) in any manner arising from or pertaining to: costs of completing analysis, records and report.
(a) any re-use of the Documentation without the prior written 12.0ASSIGNS
authorization of NTI or, (b) claim(s) by any third party (other than a.Neither party may assign duties or interest in the Contract without
Client) to whom Client distributed or provided any of the the written consent of the other party.
Documentation, either directly, through an agent, or by requesting 13.0MISCELLANEOUS
that NTI provide it to the third party, without the prior written a.If any provision or provisions of this Contract shall be held to be
authorization of NTI. invalid, illegal, unenforceable or in conflict with the law of any
b.Client agrees that all reports and other work furnished to the Client jurisdiction, the validity, legality and enforceability of the remaining
or his agents, which are not paid for, will be returned upon demand provisions shall not in any way be affected or impaired thereby.
and will not be used by the Client for any purpose. b.This Contract is the entire agreement between NTI and Client and
c.NTI will retain all pertinent records concerning Services performed it supersedes all prior written or oral agreements with respect to
for a period of two (2) years after the report is sent; during that time the subject matter hereof. No amendment or assignment ofthe
Contract shall be effective unless agreed to in a writingsigned by
business hours. authorized representatives of both parties.
d.NTI will retain representative samples for 30 days after submission c.The provisions of this Contract relating to the limitation of
of NTI report. Upon request by Client, samples can be shipped, liability and damages, warranties, indemnification, use of plans,
charges collect, to destination selected by Client; or NTI can store specifications, reports and all other Documentation provided by
them for an agreed upon storage charge. NTI and those specifying choice of law, dispute resolution, notice,
9.0DISPUTES waiver, and severability shall survive termination of this Contract.
a.All claims, disputes, and controversies arising out of or in relation d.The terms of this Contract and its enforcementand
to the performance, interpretation, application, or enforcement of interpretation shall be governed by the laws of the state where
this Contract, including, but not limited to, breach thereof, shall be the project is located. If any provision of this Contractis
referred for mediation under the then current Construction determined to be unlawful, invalid or unenforceable, that
Industry Mediation Rules of the American Arbitration Association provision shall be severed from the Contract and shallnot
prior to any recourse to litigation. render this Contract, or any other of its other provisions,
b. In the event of any litigation arising out of or relating to this Contract unlawful, invalid or unenforceable.
or the Services, the prevailing party shall be entitled to reasonable 14.0PRE-LIEN NOTICE
attorneys' and experts' fees, court costs and other costs of collection a.By signing this Contract Client represents and warrants that it either
including NTI's labor costs in connection with the prosecution of any owns fee title to, or has the legal right to direct NTI to perform
collection lawsuit. Services in connection with, the site of the project and that there is
10.0LIMITATION OF LIABILITY presently nothing to prevent NTI from filing a lien against the site of
a.CLIENT understands that the Services provided by NTI involve the the project.
application of scientific and technical skill, judgment and discretion b.ANY PERSON OR COMPANY SUPPLYING LABOR OR MATERIALS FOR
that is not an exact science and that NTI cannot and does not THIS IMPROVEMENT TO YOUR PROPERTY MAY FILE A LIEN AGAINST
guaranty the results of its Services. Instead, NTI agrees to perform YOUR PROPERTY IF THAT PERSON OR COMPANY IS NOT PAID FOR
the Services according to the Standard of Care. THE CONTRIBUTIONS.
b.c.UNDER MINNESOTA LAW, YOU HAVE THE RIGHT TO PAY PERSONS
the project, for damages due to professional negligence, negligence WHO SUPPLIED LABOR OR MATERIALS FOR THIS IMPROVEMENT
or breach of any other obligation to Client or others, will be limited DIRECTLY AND DEDUCT THIS AMOUNT FROM OUR CONTRACT PRICE,
to an amount not to exceed $20,000 or NTI's fee, whichever is less. OR WITHHOLD THE AMOUNTS DUE THEM FROM US UNTIL 120 DAYS
c.Client will notify any contractor or subcontractor who performs work AFTER COMPLETION OF THE IMPROVEMENT UNLESS WE GIVE YOU A
in connection with any work done by NTI of the limitations of liability LIEN WAIVER SIGNED BY PERSONS WHO SUPPLIED ANY LABOR OR
for design defects, errors, omissions, or professional negligence, and MATERIAL FOR THE IMPROVEMENT AND WHO GAVE YOU TIMELY
to require as a condition precedent to their performing their work, a NOTICE.
36
CITY OF CENTERVILLE
REQUEST FOR
COUNCIL ACTION
Agenda Item # Department: Requested Council Meeting Date:
6/12/2019
Administration
VII.5
TITLE OF ISSUE:
Listing Agreement - Block 7 - Titus Commercial Real Estate
BACKGROUND AND SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION:
The city's real estate listing agreement with Colliers International for the Block 7 property has now expired.
Our agent, from Colliers, was Mike Brass. Mike has now started his own company (Titus Commercial Real
Estate). City staff believes our interests would be best served to continue our relationship with Mr. Brass.
Therefore, we are recommending entering into a listing agreement with Titus Commercial Real Estate for the
Block 7 property.
COST AND SOURCE(S) OF FUNDING:
8% of sale price (6% if Mr. Brass acts as buyers agent as well)
REQUESTED COUNCIL ACTION:
Motion to approve listing agreement with Titus Commercial Real Estate for the Block 7 property.
For ClerkÓs Use:
SUPPORTED DOCUMENTS ATTACHED
Motion By: ____________________________________
Resolution Ordinance Contract Minutes Plan Map
Second By: ____________________________________
Vote Record: Aye Nay
_____
_____
Agreement
Other (specify) ____________
_____ _____ Love
_____ _____ Paar
_______________________________________________________________
_____ _____ Koski
_____ _____ Montain _______________________________________________________________
Administration Department Use:
Refer to: _________________________________
Consent
Tabled Until: ______________________________
Regular
Other: ___________________________________
37
EXCLUSIVELISTINGAGREEMENT(SALE)
ThisexclusivelistingagreementbyandbetweenTITUSCOMMERCIALREALESTATE,LLC
("Titus")andCITYOFCENTERVILLEasOwner("Owner")representstheListingPeriodeffective
June2,2019andshallcontinueforaperiodoftwentyfour(24)monthsunlesscancelledby
eitherpartywith30dayswrittennotice,butsentnoearlierthanSix(6)monthsafterthe
EffectiveDate.TitusisherebygiventheexclusiverighttosellthePropertylocatedat7073
CentervilleRoad,describedfurtheronExhibitA,ataninitialOfferingPriceof$349,000.00with
thefollowingTermscash.
Whenclosed,OwneragreestopayCommissionequaltosixpercent(6%)ofthePurchasePrice.
IntheeventthatanOutsideBrokerrepresentsthepurchaser,thecommissionpayableto
Brokershallequaleightpercent(8%)ofthePurchasePrice.
1.RighttoSell:OwnerherebygrantsTitusCommercialRealEstate,LLC.("Titus"),during
theListingPeriod,theexclusiverighttomarketandsellthePropertyforapricewhich
equalsorexceedstheSalePriceandinaccordancewithanySpecialTermswhichOwner
mayaccept.
2.PaymentofBrokerageFee:NOTICE:THECOMMISSIONRATEFORTHESALE,LEASE,
RENTALORMANAGEMENTOFREALPROPERTYSHALLBEDETERMINEDBETWEENEACH
INDIVIDUALBROKERANDITSCLIENT.
A.IfthePropertyissoldduringtheListingPeriod,inanymanner,byanyperson
andonanyterms,OwnerwillpaytheCommissiontoTitus.Owneracknowledgesthatthis
AgreementprovidesTitusexclusiverightsandthattheCommissionwillbepayabletoTituswith
iveofwhether(a)thesale
regardtoanysaleofthePropertyduringtheListingPeriod,irrespect
ismadeoreffectedbyOwnerorbyanagentorbrokerotherthanTitus,(b)thebuyerofthe
PropertywasintroducedtothePropertyorOwnerbyTitus,or(c)Titusparticipatedinthesale
inanymanner.CurrentOwnersandTenantsareexcludedfromBrokerageFee:NONE
B.If,duringtheListingPeriod,TitusshallpresentOwnerabuyerwilling
andabletopurchasethePropertyforapricewhichequalsorexceeds
theSalePriceandinaccordancewithanySpecialTerms,andOwner
shallrefusetosellthePropertytosuchbuyer,Ownershall
neverthelesspaytheCommissiontoTitusuponrequest.
C.Withinseventytwo(72)hoursfollowingtheExpirationDate,Tituswillprovide
Owneralist(the"ProtectiveList")ofallpersonswho,duringtheListingPeriod,
(i)werephysicallyshownthePropertybyTitus,or(ii)madeaffirmativeshowing
ofinterestinthePropertybycontactingTitusorrespondingtoan
advertisement.IfthePropertyissoldtoanypersonidentifiedintheProtective
Listwithinsix(6)monthsfollowingtheExpirationDate,Ownerwillpaythe
38
CommissiontoTitusuponrequest.IfTitusdoesnotprovidetheProtectiveList
toOwnerwithinseventytwo(72)hoursfollowingExpirationDate,this
Paragraph2(c)willnotbeeffective.
3.Agency/DualAgency.Ownerauthorizestoappoints MikeBrass toactasOwner'sListing
Agent(s)(the"ListingAgent(s)").ItisunderstoodandagreedthatthisAgreement
createsanagencyrelationshipwithListingAgent(s)andTitusonly,notwithanyother
salespersonsofTitus;provided,OwnerauthorizesTitustoappointothersalespersons
affiliatedwithTitusassubagentstoactonOwner'sbehalfasandwhenneeded,atTitus'
discretion.AnybrokerorsalespersonotherthanListingAgent(s)willnotbe
representingOwnerandmayrepresentapurchaser.Accordingly,forpurposesofthis
Agreement,"Titus"meansonlyListingAgent(s),includinganysubagents,andListing
Agent'sDesignatedBroker,unlessexpresslystatedotherwise.
OwneragreesthatifthePropertyissoldtoapurchaserrepresentedbyoneofTitus'
salespersonsotherthanListingAgent(s),thenOwnerconsentstoTitusactingasadual
agent.OwnerunderstandsandagreesthatdifferentsalespersonsaffiliatedwithTitus
mayrepresentdifferentsellersincompetingtransactionsinvolvingthesame
purchasers.Ownerherebyconsentstosuchrepresentationandagreesthatitshallnot
beconsideredactionbyTitusthatisadverseordetrimentaltotheinterestofeither
seller,norshallitbeconsideredaconflictofinterestonthepartofTitus.IfTitusactsas
adualagent,thenTitusshallbeentitledtotheentirecommissionpayableunderthis
AgreementplusanyadditionalcompensationTitusmayhavenegotiatedwiththe
purchaser.AcceptanceofreferralfeesbetweensalespersonsaffiliatedwithTituswill
notbeconsideredactionthatisadverseordetrimentalonthepartofthesalespersons
orTitus,norshallitbeconsideredaconflictofinterestbythesalespersonsorTitus.
4.CooperationwithOtherBrokers:OwnerunderstandsandagreesthatTitusmay,
whenappropriate,cooperatewithotherrealestatebrokersrepresentinganypotential
purchaser(each,anͻhǒƷƭźķĻ.ƩƚƉĻƩͼΜ͵ForthepurposesofthisAgreement,thetermͻƚǒƷƭźķĻ
.ƩƚƉĻƩͼshallmeananyBrokerotherthantheListingBroker(s),ListingAgent(s)orCooperating
Broker.ForpurposesofthisAgreement,thepartiesacknowledgethatBrokerwillbesharing
listingresponsibilitieswith.Λͻ/ƚƚƦĻƩğƷźƓŭ.ƩƚƉĻƩͼΜ͵ThisCooperatingBrokershallbe
partofthelistingteamforthePropertyandshallnotbeconsideredanͻhǒƷƭźķĻ.ƩƚƉĻƩͼ͵
5."Sell","SalĻͼͲͻ{ƚƌķδʹAsusedinthisAgreement,theterms"sell","sale"and"sold"
meananyconveyanceofanyinterestintheProperty,includingtheentryintoaContractfor
Deedorsimilarcontractforsale.
6.Cooperation:OwnerwillcooperatewithTitusinconnectionwithTitus'sattemptsto
marketandsellthePropertyandwilluseitsgoodfaithbesteffortstoassistTitusinanyway
thatTitusmayreasonablyrequest.OwnerrepresentstoTitusthatitisthefeeownerofthe
Property.
39
7.Information:OwnerrepresentstoTitusthatallinformationthatOwnerhasprovided
TituswithregardtotheProperty,andallinformationthatOwnerwillprovideTituswithregard
totheProperty,istrueandaccurateinallrespects,andOwnerwillindemnifyTitusandhold
Titusharmlessfromanylossesordamages,ofwhatevertype,thatmaybeincurredbyor
imposeduponTitusbyreasonofanymisstatementorinaccuracyinanysuchinformation.
8.Miscellaneous:ThisAgreementisbindingupontheheirs,successors,andassignsofthe
parties.AlloftherepresentationsandcovenantsofthisAgreementshallsurviveandbe
enforceableafterterminationoftheAgreement.ThisAgreementconstitutesthecomplete
agreementbetweenthepartiesandsupersedesanypriororalorwrittenagreementsbetween
thepartiesrelativetotheprovisionsherein.Noamendment,modificationorextensionofthis
AgreementshallbevalidorbindingunlessmadeinwritingandsignedbybothOwnerandTitus.
ThiscontractshallbegovernedbythelawsoftheStateofMinnesota.
SELLER:
Dated:CITYOFCENTERVILLE
By:
MarkStatz
Its:CityAdministrator
Address:1880MainStreet
Centerville,MN55038
Dated:TITUSCOMMERCIALREALESTATELLC
By:
MichaelA.Brass
Its:President
th
Address:20254Street,Suite106
WhiteBearLake,MN55110
40
EXHIBITA
PropertyAddress:7073CentervilleRoad,Centerville,MN55038
PID:
23.31.22.23.05
23.31.22.23.06
23.31.22.23.07
23.31.22.23.08
23.31.22.23.09
23.31.22.23.10
23.31.22.23.11
23.31.22.23.14
41
CITY OF CENTERVILLE
REQUEST FOR
COUNCIL ACTION
Agenda Item # Department: Requested Council Meeting Date:
June 12, 2019
Finance
VII.
TITLE OF ISSUE:
Decertification of Tax Increment Financing (TIF) District 1-6
BACKGROUND AND SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION:
Staff is proposing that the City Council decertify TIF District 1-6. The District was established on August 24,
2005 and no activity has taken place to date. The district has not incurred any expenditures that are permitted to
be repaid with TIF within the time period specified by State Statute. All expenditures for the demolition of
existing buildings was through the form of grants. That means that there is no legal way to reimburse any
qualified expenses that may be incurred prior to its mandatory decertification date. Any development that
requires TIF on these parcels would be better served a new district according to Northland Securities, the city's
financial advisors and Briggs and Morgan, the city's bond attorneys.
COST AND SOURCE(S) OF FUNDING:
No cost
REQUESTED COUNCIL ACTION:
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the resolution as presented.
For ClerkÓs Use:
SUPPORTED DOCUMENTS ATTACHED
Motion By: ____________________________________
Resolution Ordinance Contract Minutes Plan Map
Second By: ____________________________________
X
Vote Record: Aye Nay
_____
Other (specify)____________
_____ _____ Love
_____ _____ Paar
_______________________________________________________________
_____ _____ Koski
_____ _____ Montain _______________________________________________________________
Administration Department Use:
Refer to: _________________________________
Consent
Tabled Until: ______________________________
Regular
Other: ___________________________________
42
43
CITY OF CENTERVILLE
REQUEST FOR
COUNCIL ACTION
Agenda Item # Department: Requested Council Meeting Date:
6/12/2019
Public Works
VII.
TITLE OF ISSUE:
Wellhead Protection Plan - Part 2 Engineering Proposal
BACKGROUND AND SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION:
Recently, the MN Department of Health met with City staff and consultants to review the proposed scope of
Part 2 of our Wellhead Protection Plan. The city must submit the detailed and formal plan for Part 2 by March
of 2020. Attached is a proposal from our engineering consultant to perform the specialized work of preparing
such a plan.
COST AND SOURCE(S) OF FUNDING:
$9,800 - Water Fund
REQUESTED COUNCIL ACTION:
Motion to approve proposal from Stantec for preparation of Part 2 of the City's Wellhead Protection Plan.
For ClerkÓs Use:
SUPPORTED DOCUMENTS ATTACHED
Motion By: ____________________________________
Resolution Ordinance Contract Minutes Plan Map
Second By: ____________________________________
Vote Record: Aye Nay
_____
_____
Proposal
Other (specify) ____________
_____ _____ Love
_____ _____ Paar
_______________________________________________________________
_____ _____ Koski
_____ _____ Montain _______________________________________________________________
Administration Department Use:
Refer to: _________________________________
Consent
Tabled Until: ______________________________
Regular
Other: ___________________________________
44
Stantec Consulting Services Inc.
733 Marquette Avenue, Suite 1000, Minneapolis MN 55402-2309
June 5, 2019
File: 193803358
Attention: Mark Statz
City of Centerville
1880 Main Street
Centerville, MN 55038
Dear Mr. Statz,
Reference: Part 2 Wellhead Protection Plan Proposal, City of Centerville
The purpose of this letter is to provide you with a proposed scope of services for the completion of your Part
2 Wellhead Protection Plan. These services are designed to meet Minnesota Department of Health (MDH)
requirements for the completion of this plan, while providing you with a tool to manage the groundwater
resources that you rely upon for drinking water supplies.
Wellhead Protection Plan Status
The Part 1 Wellhead Protection Plan has been completed and was approved in January 2019. The MDH held
a scoping meeting on April 10, 2019 to outline the requirements of the Part 2 Wellhead Protection Plan. The
MDH then issued a Scoping Decision Notice letter in May 2019. This letter provides a written document of
the elements that are required to be included in the amended Part 2 plan.
The following work plan is based on the MDH Scoping Decision Notice, plus Stantec’s experience working in
other communities that have similar geologic settings and vulnerability. Should the MDH later require
additional elements not outlined in the Scoping Decision Notice, we will work with you to identify any changes
that may be required.
Part 2 Wellhead Protection Plan
1. Data Collection and Assembly
Data collection and assembly often represents one of the largest portions of the Part 2 planning effort. Data
pertaining to land use, the physical environment, public utilities, and water quantity/quality must be
incorporated into the plan. The largest amount of time and effort is spent creating the Potential Contaminant
Source Inventory (PCSI) for the delineated wellhead protection areas. The PCSI lists possible sources of
contamination within the delineated wellhead protection area that may pose a potential hazard to drinking
water quality.
45
June 5, 2019
Mark Statz
Page 2 of 5
Reference: Part 2 Wellhead Protection Plan Proposal, City of Centerville
Centerville’s Drinking Water Supply Management Area (DWSMA) has a moderate level of vulnerability. In
moderate vulnerability areas, potential sources of contamination that must be accounted for includes other
groundwater wells, storage tanks, shallow disposal wells, and other point sources with a capacity to release
a large concentration of contamination.
The State maintains rough databases of several potential contamination sources. These will be used as a
starting point for developing the PCSI. Steps to complete the inventory include:
Any potential sources of contamination will need to be verified, to account for any changes that may
have occurred since the State originally cataloged them.
New potential sources of contamination may have been introduced to the DWSMA that the State’s
inventory doesn’t account for. Likewise, existing potential sources of contamination may have never
been accounted for by the State. These will need to be identified.
Accurate location information or site status is often not available from the State. The PCSI should
attempt to refine this information as much as is practical, to ensure the final inventory is a good
representation of what lies within the DWSMA.
As part of a previous MDH implementation grant Stantec assisted the City of Centerville with, a preliminary
inventory of wells and tanks was completed. This inventory will be updated with any additional available
information and incorporated with any other potential contamination sources to be inventoried.
Further data elements that will be required to be included in the plan are maps of the following:
1. An existing comprehensive land use map.
2. An existing zoning map.
3. A map of oil and gas pipelines.
For the scope of this work plan it is assumed that Centerville can provide the above for the portion of the
DWSMA that falls inside the City limits. For the portion of the DWSMA that falls outside of Centerville, it is
assumed that the City will assist Stantec in obtain these maps for surrounding cities.
2. Development of Management Plan
The management plan comprises the heart of the Part 2 Wellhead Protection Plan. The management plan
identifies changes to the water supply system, changes to area land use, problems and opportunities in
46
June 5, 2019
Mark Statz
Page 3 of 5
Reference: Part 2 Wellhead Protection Plan Proposal, City of Centerville
managing contamination source, and outlines goals and objectives to mitigating contamination risks. An
action plan is developed to meet these goals and objectives, identifying tasks to implement following the MDH
approval of the plan. The management plan will need to be written in a manner to ensure that the
implementation tasks are both effective and feasible, given the available staffing and resources.
The existing management plan will be used as a starting point. Any successes from the original plan will be
built upon, while any difficulties from the original plan may be modified to be better implemented. As part of
the management plan, Stantec will also look for opportunities to obtain grant funding from the MDH to
implement portions of the plan. By tailoring the plan to take advantage of the available grant program, the
burden of plan implementation can be reduced somewhat. Some examples of uses for grant money include
well sealing, public education programs, removing old storage tanks, adding well security systems, inventory
updates, and spill response planning.
3. Reporting
The report is the document that summarizes the data elements and outlines the management plan. Results
of the PCSI will be mapped both on printouts and as GIS-compatible shape files.
Upon completion of the draft report, it will be presented to City staff for their review and comments. Following
meetings with staff to refine and revise the report, the final report must then be submitted to all affected local
units of government for a required 60-day review period. Following the 60-day review period, a public hearing
must also be held to present the report to the general public. Once the public hearing has been held and any
relevant comments are incorporated into the plan, the report is then submitted to the MDH for review and
approval. The approval process takes 90 days.
Following MDH approval, final copies of the approved plan are delivered to City staff. For the purposes of this
proposal, we assume that five final hard copies of the Part 2 plan will be provided along with electronic copies
(in PDF format) for archival purposes.
4. Meetings
The Part 2 planning process is expected to require four meetings in total:
Scoping Meeting: This meeting has already been held with Centerville and the MDH to officially
kickoff the Part 2 planning process. The meeting outlined the expectations for the Part 2 plan and
establishes requirements for final plan submittal.
47
June 5, 2019
Mark Statz
Page 4 of 5
Reference: Part 2 Wellhead Protection Plan Proposal, City of Centerville
Potential Contamination Source Inventory Review: This meeting presents our findings of potential
contamination sources to Citystaff. The inventory is then revised with help from Citystaff. Often, staff
members that have extensive history working (and living) in the Centerville area will be aware of
potential contamination sources that are not listed in the State’s databases. This may include items
such as old wells or storage tanks that may pre-date the State’s record-keeping.
Draft Management Plan Review Meeting: This meeting is held to review the draft management plan
and to review the action items to be implemented over the ten-year life of the plan. Getting direct
input from Centerville staff is vital to ensure that the finished plan best meets the needs for wellhead
protection planning.
Public Hearing: Following the local government review period, Centerville is required to conduct a
public hearing. Stantec staff will attend this hearing and give a brief presentation, outlining the
contents of the Part 2 plan for the staff members and the public. Stantec staff will then remain to
answer any questions posed by those in attendance.
Budget and Schedule
The budget is based on the anticipated content of the MDH’s Part 2 Scoping Decision Notice letter. The
proposed budget is presented on Table 1. The proposed budget total is $9,800, to be billed on an hourly not-
to-exceed basis. If the MDH makes unanticipated changes or requests in the project scope, the work plan
may need to be modified may need to be revised to reflect those changes. If this occurs, Stantec will work
with Centerville staff to determine what impacts, if any, these changes will have on the proposed budget.
Table 1 – City of Centerville, Part 2 Wellhead Protection Plan, Proposed Costs
Project TaskProposed Cost
Task 1 – Data Assembly $3,000
Task 2 – Management Plan $2,400
Task 3 – Reporting, Mapping $2,100
Task 4 – Meetings $1,800
Expenses $500
Total $9,800
48
June 5, 2019
Mark Statz
Page 5 of 5
Reference: Part 2 Wellhead Protection Plan Proposal, City of Centerville
A schedule for completion of this project is presented on Table 2. The deadline for the submittal of Part 2 is
March 28, 2020.
Table 2 – City of Centerville, Part 2 Wellhead Protection Plan, Estimated Schedule
Project Milestone Proposed Completion
Part 2 Scoping Meeting Held April 2019
Draft Potential Contaminant Source Inventory August 2019
Completed
Draft Management Plan Completed September 2019
City Completes Review of Draft October2019
Local Government Review (60 days) November-December 2019
Public Hearing January 2020
Submittal of Plan to MDH for Approval*February 2020
MDH Approval of Plan (following 90 day review May 2020
period)
Plan Implementation BeginsJune 2020
*due date for submittal is March 28, 2020
We hope the scope of services outlined in this proposal meets your needs. If this work plan and budget meets
with your approval, please send us a notice to proceed and we will begin work immediately. Otherwise, please
contact me at (651) 775-6532 with any comments or questions you may have regarding your wellhead
protection plan. We look forward to working with you towards the successful completion of your Wellhead
Protection Plan.
Sincerely,
Mark Janovec PG
Senior Scientist
49
CITY OF CENTERVILLE
REQUEST FOR
COUNCIL ACTION
Agenda Item # Department: Requested Council Meeting Date:
6/12/2019
Administration
VII.
TITLE OF ISSUE:
CenturyLink Settlement Agreement
BACKGROUND AND SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION:
Attached is a memo from North Metro TV staff explaining a Settlement Agreement with CenturyLink, which
the North Metro Telecommunications Commission has already passed. They are asking each member city to
accept the agreement as well.
COST AND SOURCE(S) OF FUNDING:
Cost implications are explained in the attached memo.
REQUESTED COUNCIL ACTION:
Motion to approve the attached Settlement Agreement with CenturyLink.
For ClerkÓs Use:
SUPPORTED DOCUMENTS ATTACHED
Motion By: ____________________________________
Resolution Ordinance Contract Minutes Plan Map
Second By: ____________________________________
Vote Record: Aye Nay
_____
_____
Settlement Agreement, Staff Memo
Other (specify) ____________
_____ _____ Love
_____ _____ Paar
_______________________________________________________________
_____ _____ Koski
_____ _____ Montain _______________________________________________________________
Administration Department Use:
Refer to: _________________________________
Consent
Tabled Until: ______________________________
Regular
Other: ___________________________________
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
CITY OF CENTERVILLE
REQUEST FOR
COUNCIL ACTION
Agenda Item # Department: Requested Council Meeting Date:
6/12/2019
Public Works
VII.
TITLE OF ISSUE:
Seasonal Public Works Pay
BACKGROUND AND SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION:
See attached staff memo for details.
COST AND SOURCE(S) OF FUNDING:
$400 - General Fund - Public Works/Parks Maintenance; Sewer, Water, Stormwater
REQUESTED COUNCIL ACTION:
Motion to approve pay rate for Seasonal Public Works Employees with 3 years' experience.
For ClerkÓs Use:
SUPPORTED DOCUMENTS ATTACHED
Motion By: ____________________________________
Resolution Ordinance Contract Minutes Plan Map
Second By: ____________________________________
Vote Record: Aye Nay
_____
_____
Staff memo
Other (specify) ____________
_____ _____ Love
_____ _____ Paar
_______________________________________________________________
_____ _____ Koski
_____ _____ Montain _______________________________________________________________
Administration Department Use:
Refer to: _________________________________
Consent
Tabled Until: ______________________________
Regular
Other: ___________________________________
58
MemoÈ
TO:HonorableMayorandCityCouncil
FROM:MarkStatz
DATE:June4,2019
RE:PayIncreaseforSeasonalPublicWorkswith3YearsofExperience
IthascometomyattentionthatwehaveaSeasonalPublicWorksemployeeswith3ǤĻğƩƭexperience.Thechartbelow,
whichwasapprovedbyCouncil,didnotaccountforstaffmembersreturningwithmorethan2ǤĻğƩƭexperience.We
wouldliketorecommendsettingthepayrateforSeasonalPublicWorksStaffwith3ǤĻğƩƭexperienceat$13.00(see
addedrowbelow,in bold).
Thedifferenceinpaywouldbeanadditional$60perpaycheckorabout$400overthecourseofthesummer.
Job 2018 2019
Part Time Rink Attendant $9.50/hr $10.00/hr
Seasonal Public Works Staff $10.50/hr $10.75/hr
Seasonal Public Works (1 yr exp.) $11.00/hr $11.25/hr
Seasonal Public Works (2 yr exp.) $12.00/hr $12.25/hr
Seasonal Public Works (3 yr exp.) - $13.00/hr
P&R Secretary $12.00/hr $12.25/hr
Part Time Custodian $12.50/hr $12.75/hr
PT Office Assistant $16.00/hr Grade 2ÏStep 1 ($15.65)
Part Time Finance Director $75.00/hr Grade 13 ÏStep 7 ($46.99)
59
CITY OF CENTERVILLE
REQUEST FOR
COUNCIL ACTION
Agenda Item # Department: Requested Council Meeting Date:
6/12/2019
Administration
VII.11
TITLE OF ISSUE:
CDBG/HOME Program Cooperative Agreement Amendment
BACKGROUND AND SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION:
The city opts-in to participation in the Community Development Block Grant/ Home Investment Partnership
Program. This is a federal program, administered by the County.
The Federal Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) has updated several regulations since our
last re-qualification, and we need to incorporate those changes into the Cooperation Agreement previously
signed by the city and county. Attached is Amendment No. 1 to Community Development Block Grant and
HOME Investment Partnerships Program Cooperation Agreement. The Amendment details (in items 1 and 2)
the updated language that is being added. No other terms of the Agreement are being changed or amended.
COST AND SOURCE(S) OF FUNDING:
N/A - This program provides grant funding for various projects assisting low/moderate income households.
REQUESTED COUNCIL ACTION:
Motion to adopt Amendment No. 1 to the Cooperation Agreement for the CDBG/HOME program.
For ClerkÓs Use:
SUPPORTED DOCUMENTS ATTACHED
Motion By: ____________________________________
Resolution Ordinance Contract Minutes Plan Map
Second By: ____________________________________
Vote Record: Aye Nay
_____
_____
Cooperation Agreement Amendment No. 1
Other (specify) ____________
_____ _____ Love
_____ _____ Paar
_______________________________________________________________
_____ _____ Koski
_____ _____ Montain _______________________________________________________________
Administration Department Use:
Refer to: _________________________________
Consent
Tabled Until: ______________________________
Regular
Other: ___________________________________
60
AMENDMENT NO. 1
TO COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT and
HOME INVESTMENT PARTNERSHIPS PROGRAM
COOPERATION AGREEMENT
THIS AMENDMENT is made and entered into this _____ day of _________, 2019
(“Effective Date”), by and between the County of Anoka, a political subdivision of the State of
Minnesota, 2100 Third Avenue, Anoka, Minnesota, 55303 (“County”), and the City of Centerville,
a municipal corporation under the laws of the State of Minnesota, 1880 Main Street, Centerville,
MN 55038 (“Cooperating Community”).
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, the Cooperating Community and the County have determined that it is
desirable and in the interests of its citizens that the County qualifies as an urban county within the
provisions of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974, Title I, of Public Law 93-383,
as amended (42 USC 5301 et seq) (the “Act”).
WHEREAS, the Cooperating Community and the County previously entered into an auto-
renewable Cooperation Agreement (“Agreement”) which authorizes the County to participate with
the Cooperating Community in undertaking, or to assist in undertaking, essential community
development and housing assistance activities pursuant to the CDBG Entitlement Program and
the HOME Investment Partnerships Program; and
WHEREAS, the parties’ Cooperation Agreement provides that, from time to time, as
federal laws and regulations change, updates to the Agreement may be required to bring the
terms into compliance with federal HUD regulations; and
WHEREAS, the County intends that identical amendments to cooperation agreements will
be executed between the County and other cities and townships within the County, thus enabling
the County to continue to qualify under the Act and remain in compliance with HUD guidance,
CPD 19-04 issued on March 8, 2019.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants hereinafter stated and
those contained in the original Cooperation Agreement, the parties agree to amend the
Agreement as follows:
1. Section V. entitled “Special Provisions,” paragraph C. is amended to add the following
language at the end of the provision:
“If either party refuses to adopt an amendment incorporating changes necessary to meet
requirements for cooperation agreements set for in an Urban County Qualification Notice
applicable for a subsequent three-year county qualification period, such failure to comply
will void the automatic renewal for such qualification period.”
61
2. Section V. entitled “Special Provisions,” paragraph G. is amended to add the following
language at the end of the provision:
“A unit of general local government may not sell, trade, or otherwise transfer all or any
portion of such funds to another such metropolitan city, urban county, unit of general local
government, or Indian tribe, or insular area that directly or indirectly received CDBG funds
in exchange for any other funds, credits or non-Federal considerations, but must use such
funds for activities eligible under title I of the Act.”
3. This Amendment is hereby made a part of and shall be amended to the Cooperation
Agreement of the parties.
4. All other terms and conditions of the original Cooperation Agreement, not modified by this
Amendment, shall remain in full force and effect.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have set their hands on the dates indicated.
COUNTY OF ANOKA CITY OF CENTERVILLE
By: ________________________________ By: ________________________________
Scott Schulte, Chair Jeff Paar
County Board of Commissioners Its: Mayor
Dated: ______________________________ Dated: ______________________________
ATTEST ATTEST
By: ________________________________ By: ________________________________
Rhonda Sivarajah Mark Statz
County Administrator Its: Administrator
Dated: ______________________________ Dated: ______________________________
APPROVED AS TO FORM APPROVED AS TO FORM
By: ________________________________ By: ________________________________
Christine Carney
Assistant County Attorney
Dated: _____________________________ Dated: ______________________________
62
June 12, 2019
Legal
Closing the Sale of City Property To Midwest Best Water
The sale of the Commerce Drive property is set for closing on June 13, 2019. The attached Resolution gives
final authorization to sell the property, authorizes the Mayor to sign administrative documents necessary for
closing, and appoints the City Administrator and Attorney to attend the closing and execute any final
documents that may arise between the June 12th Council meeting the property closing.
City to recieve income from this transaction.
Adopt Resolution Number 19-XX.
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
CITY OF CENTERVILLE
REQUEST FOR
COUNCIL ACTION
Agenda Item # Department: Requested Council Meeting Date:
6/12/2019
Administration
VIII.1.f
TITLE OF ISSUE:
Midwest Best Water - Easement Revision
BACKGROUND AND SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION:
Rice Creek Watershed District has an easement for Anoka County Ditch 55, running north-south along the east
side of the Midwest Best Water (MBW) site. The proposed MBW site plan necessitates their parking lot (truck
delivery area) encroaching into this easement. City and MBW representatives met with RCWD to discuss the
encroachment and all parties agreed it would be acceptable. To allow and memorialize this, RCWD produced
an amended version of the easement agreement. Since the city is the property owner, we would be required to
accept this change. The easement obligations run with the land, so they would be assumed by MBW when they
close on the sale of the property.
COST AND SOURCE(S) OF FUNDING:
N/A
REQUESTED COUNCIL ACTION:
Motion to approve the easement amendment as presented.
For ClerkÓs Use:
SUPPORTED DOCUMENTS ATTACHED
Motion By: ____________________________________
Resolution Ordinance Contract Minutes Plan Map
Second By: ____________________________________
Vote Record: Aye Nay
_____
_____
Easement Amendment
Other (specify) ____________
_____ _____ Love
_____ _____ Paar
_______________________________________________________________
_____ _____ Koski
_____ _____ Montain _______________________________________________________________
Administration Department Use:
Refer to: _________________________________
Consent
Tabled Until: ______________________________
Regular
Other: ___________________________________
86
EASEMENTAMENDMENT
TheCityofCenterville,abodycorporateandpoliticalsubdivisionoftheStateofMinnesota
ΛͻDƩğƓƷƚƩͼΜͲandtheRiceCreekWatershedDistrict,apoliticalsubdivisionoftheStateofMinnesota
withpowerssetforthatMinnesotaStatutesChapters103Band103Dandthedrainageauthorityfor
AnokaCountyDitch55pursuanttoChapter103EΛͻDƩğƓƷĻĻͼΜͲenterintothisEasementAmendment
Λͻ!ƒĻƓķƒĻƓƷͼΜassetforthherein.
WITNESS
WHEREAS Grantoristheownerinfeeofcertainrealproperty(theͻ.ǒƩķĻƓĻķtƩƚƦĻƩƷǤͼΜlocatedin
AnokaCounty,Minnesota,legallydescribedasfollows:
\[legaldescriptionofparcel\];
WHEREAS AnokaCountyDitch(ACD)55,apublicdrainagesystemunderMinnesotaStatutes
Chapter103E,crossestheBurdenedProperty;
WHEREAS GrantorpreviouslyconveyedtoGranteeaSupersedingEasementΛͻ9ğƭĻƒĻƓƷͼΜoverthe
BurdenedPropertytoallowGrantee,asdrainageauthority,tomaintainACD55inperpetuity,which
EasementwasfiledintheOfficeoftheAnokaCountyRecorderonJanuary20,2009,asDocument
No.2005016.005;
WHEREAS theEasementallowsGrantortousetheEasementAreaͻŅƚƩanypurposethatdoesnot
diminishthehydrauliccapacityoftheditchortileanddoesnotinterferewithactivityofGrantee
underthis9ğƭĻƒĻƓƷ͵ͼ
poseofdevelopingtheBurdenedProperty,Grantorwishestoprovidefor
WHEREAS forthepur
pavedsurfacetobeplacedwithintheEasementArea,overoradjacenttothesubsurfacepipethatis
apartoftheACD55system,whichsurfacemayinterferewithDƩğƓƷĻĻƭmaintenanceactivityunder
theAgreement;
NOWTHEREFORE,formutualvaluableconsideration,thereceiptandsufficiencyofwhichis
acknowledgedbytheparties,theEasementherebyisamendedasfollows:
1.ThefollowingparagraphsareaddedtotheEasement:
1
87
4a.Grantormayinstallandmaintainpavedsurface,withtypicalbaseandcurbing,within
theEasementArea.Grantormaynotinstallormaintainstormdrains,sumpsor
conveyancesoranyothersubsurfaceorsurfacestructureorappurtenancewithinthe
EasementArea.
4b.Paragraph4adoesnotlimitDƩğƓƷĻĻƭexerciseofrightsundertheEasementinamanner
thatisnecessaryorconvenientforGrantee,evenifsuchexercisecausesdamageto
DƩğƓƷƚƩƭimprovementswithintheEasementArea.
4c.GrantorwillreimburseGranteefortheadditionalcostofworkthatGranteeperforms
withintheEasementAreaduetotheneedtoworkaround,removeordisposeofDƩğƓƷƚƩƭ
improvements.GrantorholdsGranteeharmless,andwilldefendandindemnifyGrantee,
withrespecttoanydamage,claim,cost,feeorliabilitywhatsoeverarisingfromdamageto
DƩğƓƷƚƩƭimprovements,orobstructionoftheuseoftheimprovements,duringDƩğƓƷĻĻƭ
exerciseofitsrightswithintheEasementterms.
2.Asexplicitlyamended,theEasementandalltermsthereofremaininfullforceandeffect.
INWITNESSWHEREOF,thisAmendmentisexecutedandlegallybinding.
CITYofCENTERVILLE,Grantor
ΝƭźŭƓğƷǒƩĻĬƌƚĭƉΛƭΜΞ
STATEOFMINNESOTA
COUNTYOFANOKA
Theforegoinginstrumentwasacknowledgedbeforemethis______dayof_____________,2019,
by______________________as_____________,CityofCenterville.
____________________________
NotaryPublic
RICECREEKWATERSHEDDISTRICT,Grantee
By______________________________
ItsAdministrator
STATEOFMINNESOTA
COUNTYOFANOKA
Theforegoinginstrumentwasacknowledgedbeforemethis______dayof_____________,2019,
by______________________asAdministrator,RiceCreekWatershedDistrict.
____________________________
NotaryPublic
2
88
DRAFTEDBY:
SMITHPARTNERS,P.L.L.P.
400SecondAvenueSouth
Suite1200
MinneapolisMN55401
3
89
CITY OF CENTERVILLE
REQUEST FOR
COUNCIL ACTION
Agenda Item # Department: Requested Council Meeting Date:
June 12, 2019
Administration
TITLE OF ISSUE:
Presentation of 2018 Annual Audit
BACKGROUND AND SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION:
Brad Falteysek, Partner and CPA with Abdo, Eick & Meyers, will present the annual financial report, required
management communications, and audit insights to the City Council. The city has received an unqualified
(clean) audit opinion on the city's financial statements for fiscal year 2018. This means that the audit firm
believes our statements to meet Generally Accepted Accounting Practices (GAAP), present our financial
condition in a fair manner, and are free from material misstatements. There were a number of discussions
regarding accounting transactions and financial policies during the audit. These resulted in some adjusting
journal entries, but the changes were not considered to be material. Staff looks forward to using the information
contained in these reports to develop next year's budget, a capital improvement plan, and a long-range financial
management plan to be presented to the City Council.
COST AND SOURCE(S) OF FUNDING:
Budgeted funds in the General Fund, and additional funding from the Water and Sewer funds.
REQUESTED COUNCIL ACTION:
Staff recommends that the City Council make a motion to approve the Comprehensive Annual Financial Report
(CAFR) as presented. Following this approval, the financial statements will be published on the city's web site
and available for inspection by the public.
For ClerkÓs Use:
SUPPORTED DOCUMENTS ATTACHED
Motion By: ____________________________________
Resolution Ordinance Contract Minutes Plan Map
Second By: ____________________________________
Vote Record: Aye Nay
_____
CAFR,
Other (specify)____________
_____ _____ Love
_____ _____ Paar
Management Communication,
_______________________________________________________________
_____ _____ Koski
Audit Presentation
_____ _____ Montain _______________________________________________________________
Administration Department Use:
Refer to: _________________________________
Consent
Tabled Until: ______________________________
Regular
Other: ___________________________________
90
91
deficiency in internal control
material weakness
significant deficiency
92
.
93
94
Certain Asset Retirement Obligations
95
Fiduciary Activities
96
Leases
Certain Disclosures Related to Debt, including Direct Borrowings and Direct PlacementsCertain Disclosures Related to Debt, including Direct Borrowings anCertain Disclosures Related to
Debt, including Direct Borrowings and D
97
Accounting for Interest Cost Incurred before the End of a Construction Period
Majority Equity Interests
98
Note
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
Required Supplementary Information
Other Information
112
113
114
115
government-wide financial statements
statement of net position
net position
statement of activities
regardless
of the timing of related cash flows
116
governmental activities
business-type activities
fund
Governmental Funds Governmental funds
governmental activities
near-term inflows and outflows of spendable resources
balances of spendable resources
governmental fundsgovernmental activities
governmental fundsgovernmental activities
combining statements or schedulescombining statements or scheducombining statements or schedules
Proprietary Fund.Enterprise funds
business-type activities
117
unrestricted net position
118
119
120
121
Governmental Funds governmental funds
spendable
unassigned fund balance
General
Debt Service
Park
unassigned
fund balance
Proprietary Funds
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
Governmental activities,
business-type activities,
Direct expenses eect ect expenses
general revenues.general revenueeneral revenuess.
economic resources measurement focus
accrual basis of accounting,
current financial resources measurement focus
modified accrual basis of accounting.
available
144
General fund
Debt Service funddd
Park fund
Water fund
Sewer fund
operating nonoperating
145
Deposits andInvestments
146
Accounts Receivable
Interfund Receivables and Payables
Property Taxes
SpecialAssessments
Inventories
Prepaid Items
147
Capital Assets
Deferred Outflows ofResources
Pensions
148
Compensated Absences
Long-term Obligations
DeferredInflows ofResourcesoourcurces
149
Fund Balance
Nonspendable -
Restricted -
Committed -
Assigned -
Unassigned -
Net Position
150
151
Deposits
152
Investments
Credit Risk
Custodial Credit RiskRik
Concentration of Credit Risk.
Interest Rate Risk.
153
154
155
Interfund Transfers
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
Note: Schedule is intendedto show 10-year trend. Additional years will be reported as they become available.
Note: Schedule is intended to show 10-year trend. Additional years will be reported as they become available.
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
Minnesota Legal Compliance Audit Guide for Cities
Minnesota LegalCompliance Audit Guide for Cities.tta La LegalCompliance Audit nce Audit Guide foGuide for CCitiesities.
186
6/12/2019
Administration
IX. 2
Ord. #93 Revisions (First Reading) - Small Wireless Facility
On June 4, 2019 the Planning & Zoning Commission held a Public Hearing regarding the above stated code
revisions. Ms. Robyn Moore, 7353 - 20th Avenue North attended and provided input regarding the possibility
of negative health affects associated with 5G technology. Ms. Moore has been providing Commission and
Council Members with information that she has researched online. The Commission had lengthy discussion
regarding the City's ability to not allow such technology and asked for Staff to consult with the City Attorney
on this matter. However, the Commission recognized the necessity to regulate the technology as the current
code does not address it. Therefore there was support to move forward with the ordinance as written. The
subject could be revisited in the future.
N/A
Planning & Zoning Commission recommended to Council to Adopt the submitted Ord. #93 Revisions as
presented. ****FIRST READING**** No formal action @ this time.
Ord. #93 revisions as attached
187
CHAPTER 93 Î SMALL WIRELESS FACILITY ORDINANCE
WORKINGDOCUMENT
VERSION04/05/2019
§ 93.16 DEFINITIONS.
MICRO WIRELESS FACILITY means a small wireless facility that is no larger than
24 inches long, 15 inches wide, and 12 inches high, and whose exterior antenna, if any, is not
longer than 11 inches.
SMALL WIRELESS FACILITY means a wireless facility that meets both of the
following qualifications:
¤ Each antenna is located inside an enclosure of no more than six cubic feet in volume or,
in the case of an antenna that has exposed elements, the antenna and all its exposed
elements could fit within such an enclosure; and
¤ All other wireless equipment associated with the small wireless facility provided such
equipment is, in aggregate, no more than 28 cubic feet in volume, not including electric
meters, concealment elements, telecommunications demarcation boxes, battery backup
power systems, grounding equipment, power transfer switches, cutoff switches, cable,
conduit, vertical cable runs for the connection of power and other services, and any
equipment concealed from public view within or behind an existing structure or
concealment; or
¤ A micro wireless facility.
§ 93.17 PERMIT REQUIREMENT.
(A) Generally. Except as otherwise provided in this code, no person may obstruct or
excavate any right-of-way without first having obtained the appropriate permit from the
city.
(1) Excavation permit.
(a) An excavation permit is required to excavate that part of the right-of-way
described in the permit and to hinder free and open passage over the
specified portion of the right-of-way, to the extent and for the duration
specified therein.
(b) An obstruction permit is not required if a person already possesses a valid
excavation permit for the same project.
(2) Obstruction permit.
188
(a) An obstruction permit is required to hinder free and open passage over the
specified portion of rights-of-way by placing equipment and/or garbage
containers described therein on the rights-of-way, to the extent and for the
duration specified therein.
(b) An obstruction permit is not required if a person already possesses a valid
excavation permit for the same project.
(3) Small wireless facility permit. A small wireless facility permit is required by a
registrant to erect or install a wireless support structure, to collocate a small
wireless facility, or to otherwise install a small wireless facility in the specified
portion or the right-of-way, to the extent specified therein, provided that such
permit shall remain in effect for the length of time the facility is in use, unless
lawfully revoked.
(B) Permit extensions. No person may excavate or obstruct the right-of-way beyond the date
or dates specified in the permit unless the person makes both a supplementary application
for another right-of-way permit before the expiration of the initial permit, and a new
permit or permit extension is granted.
(C) Delay penalty. The city shall establish and impose a delay penalty for unreasonable
delays in right-of-way excavation, obstruction, patching or restoration. The delay penalty
shall be established from time to time by City Council resolution.
(D) Permit display. Permits issued under this subchapter shall be conspicuously displayed or
otherwise available at all times at the indicated work site and shall be available for
inspection by city.
(E) No permit required . A small wireless facility permit is not required, nor any permit fee or
collocation agreement in order to conduct any of the following activities:
(1) Routine maintenance of a small wireless facility;
(2) Replacement of a small wireless facility with a new facility that is substantially
similar or smaller in size, weight, height, and wind or structural loading than the small
wireless facility being replaced; or
(3) Installation, placement, maintenance, operation, or replacement of micro wireless
facilities that are suspended on cables strung between existing utility poles in compliance
with national safety codes.
Advance notification to the city of these activities is required if the work will obstruct a
public right-of-way.
Ord. #74, adopted 11/27/2002, Ord. 2d # 25, amended 12/10/2008
189
§ 93.19 ISSUANCE OF PERMIT; CONDITIONS.
(A) Permit issuance. If the applicant has satisfied the requirements of this subchapter, the
city shall issue a permit.
(B) Conditions. The city may impose reasonable conditions upon the issuance of the permit
and the performance of the applicant thereunder to protect the health, safety and welfare
of the public or when necessary to protect the right-of-way and its current use.
(C) Small wireless facility conditions. Subject to a required city issued permit and pursuant to
Minn. Stat. § 237.163, subd. 2(f), the placement of small wireless facilities and wireless
support structures to accommodate small wireless facilities is a permitted use in a public
right-of-way, provided however that a special or conditional land use permit is required
to install a new wireless support structure for the siting of a small wireless facility in a
right-of-way in a district or area zoned for single-family residential use or within a
historic district established by federal or state law or city ordinance as of the date of
application for a small wireless facility permit. This paragraph does not apply to areas
outside a public right-of-way that are zoned and used exclusively for single-family
residential use.
In addition to the above paragraph of this clause (c), as applicable, and to clause (b)
above, the erection or installation of a wireless support structure, the collocation of a
small wireless facility, or other installation of a small wireless facility in the right-of-way,
shall be subject to the following conditions:
(1) A small wireless facility shall only be collocated on the particular wireless support
structure, under those attachment specifications, and at the height indicated in the
applicable permit application.
(2) No new wireless support structure installed within the right-of-way shall exceed 50
feet in height without the city's written authorization, provided that the city may
impose a lower height limit in the applicable permit to protect the public health,
safety and welfare or to protect the right-of-way and its current use, and further
provided that a registrant may replace an existing wireless support structure
exceeding 50 feet in height with a structure of the same height subject to such
conditions or requirements as may be imposed in the applicable permit.
(3) No wireless facility constructed in the right-of-way after \[MONTH DAY OF
IMPLIMENTAION, 2019\] may extend more than ten feet above its wireless support
structure in place as of \[MONTH DAY OF IMPLIMENTAION, 2019\].
(4) Where an applicant proposes to install a new wireless support structure in the right-of-
way after \[MONTH DAY OF IMPLIMENTAION, 2019\], the city may impose
separation requirements between such structure and any existing wireless support
structure or other facilities in and around the right-of-way for purposes of the public
190
health, safety and welfare, reasonable city right-of-way management, or protection of
the right-of-way and its uses.
(5) Where an applicant proposes collocation on a decorative wireless support structure,
sign or other structure not intended to support small wireless facilities, the city may
impose reasonable requirements to accommodate the particular design, appearance or
intended purpose of such structure.
(6) Where an applicant proposes to install a new or replacement wireless support
structure for a small wireless facility or to collocate a small wireless facility on a
wireless support structure in a public right-of-way, the city may impose reasonable
restocking, replacement, or relocation requirements on the replacement of such
structure.
(7) The city may condition its approval on compliance with generally applicable and
reasonable health, safety, and welfare regulations consistent with the city's public
right-of-way management.
Pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 237.163, subd. 3a, an approval of a small wireless facility
permit under this section authorizes the installation, placement, maintenance, or operation
of a small wireless facility to provide wireless service and shall not be construed to
confer authorization to (i) provide any service other than a wireless service, or (ii) install,
place, maintain, or operate a wireline backhaul facility in the right-of-way.
(D) Small wireless facility agreement. A small wireless facility shall only be collocated on a
small wireless support structure owned or controlled by the city, or any other city asset in
the right-of-way, after the applicant has executed a standard small wireless facility
collocation agreement with the city. The standard collocation agreement may require
payment of the following:
(1) Up to $150.00 per year for rent to collocate on the city structure.
(2) Twenty-five dollars per year for maintenance associated with the collocation;
(3) A monthly fee for electrical service as follows:
a. Seventy-three dollars per radio node less than or equal to 100 maximum watts;
b. One hundred eighty-two dollars per radio node over 100 maximum watts; or
c. The actual costs of electricity, if the actual cost exceed the foregoing.
The standard collocation agreement shall be in addition to, and not in lieu of, the required
small wireless facility permit, provided, however, that the applicant shall not be
additionally required to obtain a license or franchise in order to collocate. Issuance of a
small wireless facility permit does not supersede, alter or affect any then-existing
agreement between the city and applicant.
Ord. #74, adopted 11/27/2002
191
§ 93.20 PERMIT FEES.
(A) Excavation permit fee. The city shall establish an excavation permit fee in the amount
sufficient to recover the following costs:
(1) The city management costs; and
(2) Degradation costs, if applicable.
(B) Obstruction permit fee. The city shall establish the obstruction permit fee, which shall be
in an amount sufficient to recover the city management costs.
(C) Payment of permit fees. No excavation permit or obstruction permit shall be issued
without payment of excavation or obstruction permit fees.
(D) Nonrefundable. Permit fees that were paid for a permit that the city has revoked for a
breach as stated in § 93.27 are not refundable.
(E) Application to franchises. Unless otherwise agreed to in the franchise, management costs
may be charged separately from and in addition to the franchise fees imposed on a right-
of-way user in the franchise.
(F) Establishment. All permit fees shall be established by resolution of the City Council.
(G) Small wireless facility permit fee. The city shall impose a small wireless facility permit
fee in an amount sufficient to recover management costs.
§ 93.23 DENIAL OF PERMIT.
(A) The city may deny a permit for failure to meet the requirements and conditions of this
subchapter if the city determines that the denial is necessary to protect the health,
safety of the public and welfare, or when necessary to protect the right-of-way and its
current use. The city may additionally deny a permit for the following reasons:
(1) The applicant failed to fully comply with the application requirements herein.
(2) Except for small wireless facilities permits, the city has initiated revocation of a
prior permit issued under this article against the applicant.
(3) Except for small wireless facilities permits, the applicant has violated within the
past two years any requirements of this article.
(4) The time schedule for the project will conflict or interfere with a community
exhibition, celebration, festival or any other similar community event in the area
of the project.
192
(5) The time schedule for the project conflicts with scheduled public improvement of
the public right-of-way.
(6) The time schedule for the project conflicts with another applicant's previously
approved project.
(7) The proposed project violates a provision of this chapter or city Code.
(8) The proposed project is adverse to the public health, safety and welfare, by
interfering with the safety and convenience of ordinary travel over the public
right-of-way, or endangers the public right-of-way and its users based on one or
more of the following factors:
a. The extent of public right-of-way area available;
b. The competing demands for the particular proposed area space in the public
right-of-way;
c. The availability of other locations in the public right-of-way or in other public
rights-of-way for the facility(ies) or equipment of the permit applicant;
d. The applicability of an ordinance or other regulation that affect the location of
a facility or equipment in the public right-of-way;
e. Except for small wireless facilities permits, the applicant's prior
noncompliance with the terms and conditions of its franchise, this article and
other applicable ordinances and regulations;
f. The condition and age of the public right-of-way and the city's scheduled
reconstruction thereof; and
g. The costs of disruption to the public and damage to the public right-of-way
balanced against any benefits to the public served by an expansion into
additional parts of the public right-of-way for facilities or equipment.
(B) Right to cureÏSmall wireless facilities. Pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 237.163, subd. 4(f),
for small wireless facilities permits, if a permit application is denied, the
telecommunications right-of-way user may cure the deficiencies identified by the city
and resubmit its application.
(C) Procedural requirements. The denial of a permit must be made in writing and must
document the basis for the denial. The city must notify the applicant or right-of-way
user in writing within three business days of the decision to deny a permit. If an
application is denied, the right-of-way user may address the reasons for denial
identified by the city and resubmit its application. If the application is resubmitted
within 60 days of receipt of the notice of denial, no additional application fee shall be
193
imposed. The city must approve or deny the resubmitted application within 60 days
after submission.
§ 93.29 LOCATION OF FACILITIES.
(A) Locations. Placement, locations and relocation of facilities must comply with the act,
with other applicable local or state law, and with Minn. Rules.
(B) Corridors. The city may assign specific corridors within the right-of-way or any
particular segment thereof as may be necessary, for each type of facilities that is located
or, pursuant to current technology, the city expects will someday be located within the
right-of-way. All excavation, obstruction or other permits issued by the city involving
the installation or replacement of facilities shall designate the proper corridor for the
facilities at issue.
(C) Limitation of space. To protect health, safety and welfare or when necessary to protect
the right-of-way and its current use, the city shall have the power to prohibit or city shall
strive to the extent possible to accommodate all existing and potential users of the right-
of-way, but shall be guided primarily by considerations of the public interest, the publicÓs
needs for the particular utility service, the condition of the right-of-way, the time of year
with respect to essential utilities, the protection of existing facilities in the right-of-way,
and future city plans for public improvements and development projects which have been
determined to be in the public interest.
(D) Collocation of small cell wireless facilities. Collocation of small wireless facilities and
installation of wireless support structures, approved by the city and in compliance with
Minn. Stat. §§ 237.162, 237.163, are exempted from this section.
§ 93.35 ACTION ON SMALL WIRELESS FACILITY PERMIT APPLICATIONS.
(A) Deadline for action. The city shall approve or deny a small wireless facility permit
application within 90 days after filing of such application. The small wireless facility
permit, and any associated building permit application, shall be deemed approved if the
city fails to approve or deny the application within the review periods established in this
section.
(B) Consolidated applications. An applicant may file a consolidated small wireless facility
permit application addressing the proposed collocation of up to 15 small wireless
facilities, or a greater number if agreed to by the city, provided that all small wireless
facilities in the application:
(1) Are located within a two-mile radius;
(2) Consist of substantially similar equipment; and
194
(3) Are to be placed on similar types of wireless support structures.
In rendering a decision on a consolidated permit application, the city may approve some
small wireless facilities and deny others, but may not use denial of one or more permits
as a basis to deny all small wireless facilities in the application.
(C)Tolling of deadline. The 90-day deadline for action on a small wireless facility permit
application may be tolled if:
(1) The city receives applications from one or more applicants seeking approval of
permits for more than 30 small wireless facilities within a seven-day period. In such
case, the city may extend the deadline for all such applications by 30 days by
informing the affected applicants in writing of such extension.
(2) The applicant fails to submit all required documents or information and the city
provides written notice of incompleteness to the applicant within 30 days of receipt
the application. Upon submission of additional documents or information, the city
shall have ten days to notify the applicant in writing of any still-missing information.
(3) The city and a small wireless facility applicant agree in writing to toll the review
period.
Ord. ####, revised xx/xx/2019
195
CITY OF CENTERVILLE
REQUEST FOR
COUNCIL ACTION
Agenda Item # Department: Requested Council Meeting Date:
6/12/2019
Administration
IX.3
TITLE OF ISSUE:
Setting Workshop Agendas
BACKGROUND AND SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION:
I've received a number of suggestions from CC members for workshop topics. Here is my suggested schedule:
June 26 - Prelim Budget
July 24 - Capital Equipment Fund/Road Fund/City Hall Renovation
August 28 - General Fund Budget
September 25 - Final Budget (if needed) - Water Fund
October 23 - Sewer Fund
November 27 - Storwater Fund
December 11 (first mtg of month) - Park Dedication Fees
Other suggestions: Staff/Union Issues; Public Safety; Business Continuity; Ordinance Updates; Youth Cmte.
COST AND SOURCE(S) OF FUNDING:
N/A
REQUESTED COUNCIL ACTION:
Staff is looking for informal direction from Council on the suggested schedule of workshops for the rest of the
year. We are also open to adding workshops at every meeting, rather than just the second meeting of the month.
For ClerkÓs Use:
SUPPORTED DOCUMENTS ATTACHED
Motion By: ____________________________________
Resolution Ordinance Contract Minutes Plan Map
Second By: ____________________________________
Vote Record: Aye Nay
_____
_____
Other (specify) ____________
_____ _____ Love
_____ _____ Paar
_______________________________________________________________
_____ _____ Koski
_____ _____ Montain _______________________________________________________________
Administration Department Use:
Refer to: _________________________________
Consent
Tabled Until: ______________________________
Regular
Other: ___________________________________
196
197