HomeMy WebLinkAbout2019-09-11 CC Packet
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
9/11/2019
Administration/Engineering
V.1
Public Hearing - Downtown Street and Utility Improvements
Because the city is contemplating special assessments to benefiting properties for the proposed street and utility
improvements, there are two public hearings required. Tonight's public hearing is the first of those two and is
known as the Improvement Hearing. The purpose of the hearing is to take input from the public on the need for
and scope of the proposed improvements. While the primary purpose of the hearing is not to discuss
assessments, a reasonable estimate of costs to be assessed must be made available at the meeting. Staff
encourages Council to take input on assessment methodology, overall % of costs assessed and other general
items related to assessments. The opportunity to discuss individual assessments will come with the second
hearing (Assessment Hearing), to be held after bids have been taken.
$2.4 Million; Water Utility Fund; General Fund (Street Fund); Stormwater Utility Fund; CBDG Grant
Hold a Public Hearing on the Proposed Improvements
PowerPoint Presentation on Project
11
City of Centerville2020 Downtown AreaStreet & Utility Improvements
Feasibility Report
12
13
History
Project
avement Management
Location &
Project LimitsPPlanAnoka County Community Development Block Grant
•••
Roadway ConditionUtilitiesDrainage
•••
14
Existing Conditions
15
Storm Sewer: Replacement and Extension Water Main: New Water Main and Services
Proposed Utility Improvements
16
Roadway: Full Reconstruct with concrete curb and gutter
Proposed Roadway Improvements
34’ Wide
(Parking on one side)
17
Typical Sections
28’ Wide
City) =
-
459
18
ontingencies and 25% indirect costs
Estimated costs include 10% construction cEstimated assessment amount (non$306,
••
Estimated Project
Costs and Funding
19
Project Schedule
298
20%
$5,
-–
2020 Downtown 2020 Downtown
••
ssessed
Percentage of Project Costs A
Average Assessment/Residential Lot
Proposed 2020 Downtown••
20
884
29%
141
$6,
oot Assessment basis per policy
-–
f
-
25%
15 years, 4%100% of front yard (short side)20% of side yard (long side)
$4,
-–
•••
TermsFront
All Projects••
2009 Peltier Lk Dr 2013 Center St 2009 Peltier Lk Dr 2013 Center St
••••
ssessed
Percentage of Project Costs A
Average Assessment/Residential Lot
Previous Projects••
Proposed Assessments (Residential)
21
Improvements are feasible and cost effectiveAdopt report as a guide for the proposed improvementsOrder and hold Public Improvement HearingAuthorize preparation of plans and specifications
(design phase)Receive bidsHold an Assessment HearingConstruct improvements
•••••••
Conclusion & Recommendations
22
Questions
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
9/11/2019
Parks
VII.4
Storage of Bald Eagle Waterski Club Ramp
Bald Eagle Waterski Club has requested the storage of their ski jump on Trailside park. Our agreement with the
club allows storage of their docks. This request has been reviewed by the public works department and and the
Parks and Recreation Committee, both of whom recommended approval of this request.
N/A
Motion to approve storage of the Bald Eagle Wateski Club's ramp at Trailside Park.
Support info
33
From:Douglas Shipp
To:Mark Statz
Subject:Dock & Jump Placement
Date:Friday, August 30, 2019 9:39:36 AM
Attachments:Jump & Dock Placement.pdf
Caution: This email originated outside our organization; please use caution.
Good Morning Mark,
Attached please find an aerial map depicting the proposed winter storage location of Bald
Eagle's dock system and jump. We have already positioned and collapsed the docks near the
southernmost property line, and are hoping to locate the jump next to the docks. The overall
size of our jump requires a lowboy trailer and MnDOT oversize load permitting in order to
transport it via roadways for winter storage. This method is cost-prohibitive for our club, and
causes damage to the jump frame.
With the side curtains removed, our jump has a rectangular footprint of 14ft wide by
approximately 24ft long. Our hope is to place it next to our docks on shore, while avoiding the
sewer manhole to allow for emergency access. The ramp deck will be folded down to the
supporting structure to reduce its profile view as much as possible. We estimate its folded
height will not exceed 4ft, and would likely be less. I expect it to be very close to the same
height as our docks when on shore. We performed some rough measurements from the land
side riprap to the manhole cover, and believe we have 24ft of clearance between these two
points, in case we cannot maneuver the jump far enough south to avoid the manhole
altogether. I'm confident that we can maintain adequate clearance for access. The jump frame
is set inside the ramp surface on the approach end and sides, and will be flush with the deck
on the takeoff side when collapsed. We will purchase a tarp large enough to conceal the jump
if the City of Centerville and the Parks and Recreation Committee so desires. This will also
potentially conceal our docks while in storage.
We have postponed our club's work day for jump removal pending your approval of our
placement plan. Our next proposed date is Thursday, Sept. 5. Will Centerville please allow us
to store our jump next to our docks in Trailside Park over the winter?
Thank you for your consideration. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions,
need me to clarify any part of our plan, or would like me to address your Parks and Recreation
Committee directly.
Sincerely,
Doug Shipp
Bald Eagle Waterski Shows, Inc.
651-329-1022
34
airhsipp5@msn.com
35
Dfoufswjmmf
Mblf
Manhole
Jump
Docks
Qbsl!Cfodi
Usbjm!Tjef!Qbsl
8256!Nbjo!Tu
1/59!bdsft
36
Nbsdi!312:
September 11, 2019
Stormwater
Pave trail at SE Corner of Acorn Creek Park
The City had Olson Contracting replace rotted culverts under the trail and install new culverts. The trail needs
to be paved and the City is contracting separately the paving portion as a cost saving measure. The city recived
3 quotes ranging of $1,970.00, $2,100.00, $2,715.00 and recommend the work be awarded to Asphalt
Restoration Company Inc. for $1,970.00.
Storm Water Fund
To award the work to Asphalt Restoration Company, Inc. for $1,970.00.
Quote
37
38
39
40
9/11/2019
Public Works
VII.7
Minnesota Department of Health Grant Application - Well Sealing
As part of our Wellhead Protection Plan work, we sent out surveys to land owners with wells on their property.
Several of them have sent those surveys back, indicating that they would be interested in sealing their wells.
The attached grant application would fund that work along with administrative costs.
Up to $10,000 grant.
Motion to approve submittal of MDH Grant Application.
Grant Application
41
9/11/2019
Public Safety
VII.6
Proposed 2020 Centennial Lakes Police Department Budget
Annually, the Centennial Lakes Police Department (CLPD) Governing Board formulates and approves a
proposed budget for the coming year. At its July 15 meeting, the Governing Board adopted the attached
budget. It is customary for each of the three cities involved to have their City Council's approve of the budget
as well.
$861,589 - General Fund (Public Safety) - 0.7% decrease from last year's budget
Motion to approve proposed 2020 Budget for CLPD.
Budget and support memo.
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
9/11/2019
Administration/Engineering
VIII.1.a
Resolution 19-0XX Ordering the Improvements & Authorizing Plans and Specifications - Downtown S&U Imp
After taking public input at the Improvement Hearing, if the City Council wishes to move forward with the next
step in the process for the Downtown Street and Utility Improvements Project, it should consider adopting the
attached resolution. The resolution adopts "orders the improvements" and authorizes the plans and
specifications to be prepared. "Ordering the improvements" is a term in state statute that must be used, but it
can be a bit misleading. By taking this action, you are simply asking to have the plans prepared. The decision
on whether or not to go forward with constructing the project will come once bids have been received and after
hearing from the public, again, during the Assessment Hearing.
$2.4 Million; Water Utility Fund; General Fund (Street Fund); Stormwater Utility Fund; CBDG Grant
Motion to adopt Resolution 19-0XX Ordering the Improvements and Authorizing the Preparation of Plans and
Specifications for the Downtown Street and Utility Improvements.
71
72
9/11/2019
Administration/Engineering
VIII.1.b
Approving Proposal for Design Services - Stantec
Stantec has submitted a proposal to prepare the plans and specifications and to aid the city in bidding the
project.
$113,036; Water Utility Fund; General Fund (Street Fund); Stormwater Utility Fund; CBDG Grant
Motion to accept proposal from Stantec for design and bidding services.
73
Stantec Consulting Services Inc.
733 Marquette Avenue Suite 1000, Minneapolis MN 55402-2309
September 4, 2019
File: 193804758
Attention: Mr. Mark Statz, City Administrator/Engineer
City of Centerville
1880 Main Street
Centerville, MN 55038
Reference: Proposal for Engineering Design Services – Downtown Street and Utility Reconstruction
Project
Dear Mark,
This letter outlines the Scope of Services and estimated costs for providing engineering design services for
Centerville’s proposed downtown street and utility reconstruction project (the Project). The streets included
in the project include 2-1/2 blocks of Sorel Street, Goiffon Road, Progress Road south of Main Street, one
block of Centerville Road north of Main Street, Heritage Street east of Centerville Road. See the attached
map of the proposed project area. The improvements will generally include full reconstruction of the road
with the addition of curb and gutter, storm sewer improvements, and the addition of water main and water
service to the existing residences that are currently served by private wells. The City has received a grant
to extend water service to income-qualified residents in the project area.
The design for this project would consist of the following tasks in accordance with Stantec’s Professional
Services Agreement with the City of Centerville:
Engineering Phase:
Task 1 – Design of street and pedestrian facilities with parameters as proposed in the feasibility study.
Task 2 – Design of water main and water services with parameters as proposed in the feasibility study.
Task 3 – Analysis of stormwater management and permitting requirements, and design of storm water
conveyance system within project area. Design of stormwater management systems such as off-
site irrigation is not included in this scope.
Task 4 – Attendance at one Council Meeting to present plans and receive authorization to advertise for
bids.
Task 5 – Preparation of bidding documents to include plans, specifications, and Advertisement for Bids.
Documents to conform with bidding requirements set forth by funding agencies.
Task 6 – Assistance during bidding including answering contractor questions, preparing Addenda as
necessary, and attendance at bid opening.
74
September 4, 2019
Mr. Mark Statz, City Administrator/Engineer
Page 2 of 3
Reference:Proposal for Engineering Design Services – Downtown Street and Utility Reconstruction Project
Task 7 – Review of bids and preparation of bid tab and award letter to City Council.
Task 8 – Attendance at one Council Meeting to present bid results
Task 9 – Prepare permitting application materials and follow-up on permit procurement for the following
permits:
MN Department of Health for Water Main Expansion
NPDES Stormwater Permit, including preparation of Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan
Rice Creek Watershed (design of required stormwater management BMPs not included in
scope)
Proposed Schedule
The anticipated schedule for the design and bidding of the project is as follows:
September 11, 2019Authorization to begin work
October 23, 2019Approve plans and specifications/Authorize Bidding
December 4, 2019Receive Bids
December 11, 2019Review Bids/Award Contract
Spring 2020Begin Construction
The Engineering Phase will be performed on an hourly basis with an estimated fee of $113,036 including
expenses. This is a not-to-exceed fee without prior authorization. This scope and fee assume that the
process will commence from start to finish with no interruption of engineering services.
Once the project has been awarded and a schedule submitted by the contractor, we will provide a more
detailed proposal for construction services for consideration by the City, which will include full-time project
inspection and construction management, construction staking, and record plan preparation.
This letter and scope of services represents the understanding between the City and Stantec in respect to
the Project and may only be modified in writing signed by both of us and is subject to the current Master
Services Agreement between the City and Stantec.
If this letter satisfactorily sets forth conditions of our Agreement, please sign in the space below and
return one copy to our office. Thank you for the opportunity to provide these services.
75
September 4, 2019
Mr. Mark Statz, City Administrator/Engineer
Page 3 of 3
Reference:Proposal for Engineering Design Services – Downtown Street and Utility Reconstruction Project
CITY OF CENTERVILLE
By
Print Name and Title
Date
If you have any questions, need additional information, or wish to discuss this proposal in greater detail,
please contact us.
Regards,
Stantec Consulting Services Inc.
Lee M. Mann P.E.Kellie Schlegel, P.E.
PrincipalAssociate
612-712-2085612-712-2125
Lee.mann@stantec.comKellie.schlegel@stantec.com
c:file
Attachment:Figure 1: Proposed Improvements
76
C
N
Drawingname:V:\\1938\\active\\193804758\\CAD\\Dwg\\193804758_FeasibilityFigures.dwgPlotDate:08/19/2019-10:52am
Xrefs:,616map_nad83,193804758_XSPL,193804758_XSNO,193804758_XSWT,193804758_C100,193804758_XSST,193804758_XSXT,193804758_XSSW K
O
L
A
.
E
L
1
A
4
R
W
G
R
A
A
T
N
G
E
E
R
-
V
I
E
W
C
R
E
E
K
EMENTARY
RVILLEEL
CENTE
OOL
SCH
STREET
WESTVIEW
NONE
7121
NONE
D
NONE
A
O
R
NONE
1695
1691
TREET
S
MAIN
.14
C.S.A.H
E
1724
L
L
I
V
7096
R
7087
E
7087
T
N
7085
1744
7086
E
C
NONE
SORELSTREET
7082
168716957082
D
A
O
R
1588168070721724
D
R
D
A
D
E
A
O
1580
U
T
7072
NONE
O
R
P
A
R
R
E
NONE
W
S
R
NS
A
E
O
E
R
F
L
7059
F
GC
I
O
704570597067
O
16431649
R
R
G
70567064
70601721704817451749
P
O
A
STREET
HERITAGE
D
704617161724174017441748
D
R
I
V
E
E
Y
V
I
A
R
W
D
B
I
J
O
D
A
O
ETT
AR
YB
NCE
AU
CH
R
E
L
E
NS
RDE
L GA
T
I
T
V
O
R
M
E
A
L
T
N
E
C
150300
LEGEND
PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT AREA
PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS
CITY OF CENTERVILLE, MN
FIGURE:1
2020 DOWNTOWN STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
733 Marquette Avenue, Suite 1000
Minneapolis, MN 55402
77
www.stantec.com
DATE8/19/2019 PROJ. NO.193804758
CITY OF CENTERVILLE
REQUEST FOR
COUNCIL ACTION
Agenda Item # Department: Requested Council Meeting Date:
September11,2019
Administration
TITLE OF ISSUE:
AuthorizeModificationstoParkCapitalLoanfromSewerFund
BACKGROUND AND SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION:
StaffisbringingforwardaResolutiontomodifytheexistingloantoprovideforazerointerestratefrom
inception.Thisrecommendationisbasedoffthediscussionheldatthepreviouscouncilmeeting.
COST AND SOURCE(S) OF FUNDING:
Nonetcost.
REQUESTED COUNCIL ACTION:
StaffrecommendsthattheCityCouncilapprovetheattachedresolutionaspresented.
For Clerk’s Use:
SUPPORTED DOCUMENTS ATTACHED
Motion By: ____________________________________
Resolution Ordinance Contract Minutes Plan Map
Second By: ____________________________________
Y
Vote Record: Aye Nay
_____
Other (specify) ____________
_____ _____ Love
_____ _____ Paar
ResolutionModifyingtheInterfundLoan
_______________________________________________________________
_____ _____ Koski
_____ _____ Montain _______________________________________________________________
Administration Department Use:
Refer to: _________________________________
Consent
Tabled Until: ______________________________
Regular
5
Other: ___________________________________
78
79
9/11/2019
Planning
IX.2
Downtown Zoning Changes
See Planning Memo for background info.
N/A
Motion to adopt Resolution #19-0XX Rezoning Certain Properties from M-1 to M-2.
Motion to adopt Resolution #19-0XX Changes to M-1, M-2 and Table of Allowed Uses.
Motion to approve changes to the Downtown Master Plan.
Planning Memo
80
733 Marquette Avenue, Suite 1000, Minneapolis, MN 55402
Memorandum
DATE: September 11, 2019
TO: Centerville City Council
FROM: Phil Carlson, AICP, and Lauren Walburg, Stantec
RE: Downtown Zoning Changes
BACKGROUND
In light of the possible redevelopment of Block 7, the City has decided to revisit the relevant
Master Plan and zoning requirements to ensure that any potential development meets City
expectations. The City held a joint meeting of the EDA, Planning and Zoning Commission, and City
Council on October 24, 2018 to discuss changes to the zoning map, zoning code and Master Plan.
The understanding at that meeting was that more formal action would be taken down the road to
formalize these changes. At their meeting on September 3, the Planning and Zoning Commission
recommended approval of the changes to the city zoning code, zoning map and Master Plan.
The City Council is asked to consider formal changes to the zoning code, zoning map and Master
Plan as detailed in this memo to address these issues. A public hearing is required prior to
amending the zoning code and official zoning map. The notice of public hearing was published in
the official newspaper at least 10 days prior, and the hearing was held at the Planning
Commission meeting on September 3, 2019.
81
September 11, 2019
Centerville City Council
Page 2 of 10
RE: Downtown Zoning Updates
PLANNING ISSUES
Master Plan Updates
There are several changes that have been discussed to the Master Plan and Development
Guidelines for Downtown Centerville. This document is referenced directly in the zoning code and
provides development guidelines for downtown. Given past discussions with the Planning and
Zoning Commission, the following changes are proposed to the Master Plan document:
(1)
Neighborhood as M-2 to better correlate with the zoning code.
(2)
and maximum residential density standards. The minimum residential density will be 12 units
per acre, and the maximum density will be 30 units per acre. These changes are consistent
with the Comprehensive Plan.
(3)
secure parking for residences within the Mixed-Use Corridors will be fully enclosed in private
facilities, where feasible. Given the limitations with the water table experienced at Block 7,
there should be some flexibility for this requirement.
(4)
promote consistency in the public realm, the City will be responsible for designing and
building streetscaping, with the costs borne by developers and/or abutting property
(5)
(6)
regarding setbacks shall be updated to be more in line with current setback language
standards. The section will be updated as follows:
Setbacks from public streets should be consistent at 50 feet from street center line. All
buildings should be required to have some portion that extends to exactly 45 feet from the
street centerline. Buildings shall be set back no more than five (5) feet from the right-of-
way or roadway easement. All ground floor units oriented toward the street should have
stoops or porches. Ground floor stoops at the first floor should have a consistent setback of
exactly 8 5 to 10 feet.
82
September 11, 2019
Centerville City Council
Page 3 of 10
RE: Downtown Zoning Updates
(7)
ll resident parking must be enclosed in below
grade garages or garages that are internal to the sites, where feasible.
(8)In Section C. II. a. the photo below parking strategies showing a stormwater pond and
is inconsistent with the content of this section.
(9)
zoning code which does not set a minimum lot area.
(10)
with other setback requirements in this section:
Primary building facades should be consistent at the built-to line. Build-to line shall be 20 ft.
behind the public ROW no more than 5 feet from the right-of-way or roadway easement.
Ground floor stoops or porches may extend to 8 ft from the sidewalk should have a
consistent setback of 5-10 feet. Setbacks from the built-to line for courtyards or other
recesses shall not comprise more than 40% of the façade. All buildings must be built to the
build-to lines at all street corners.
(11)
be updated to 30 units per acre. These
densities are consistent with the zoning code.
(12)
subject to individual review.
(13)
parking for residences within the Downtown
Neighborhood will be fully enclosed in private facilities, where feasible.
(14)
promote consistency in the public realm, the City will be responsible for designing and
building streetscaping, with the costs borne by developers and/or abutting property
(15)In Section C. IV. all text will be removed as it is redundant with the zoning code. The only
section that will remain is the first paragraph
83
September 11, 2019
Centerville City Council
Page 4 of 10
RE: Downtown Zoning Updates
Land Use Plan
essentially the same areas guided for the Central Business District/Mixed Use. The exceptions are
the strip to the south of Main Street, and the area to the east of Centerville Lake that were both
reguided from low density residential to CBD/MU (see map excepts below).
ted for background purposes, and no action is
needed at this time with regard to the land use plan. These changes were made during the 2040
Comprehensive Plan Update, and approval is pending with the Metropolitan Council.
2030 Future Land Use Plan 2040 Future Land Use Plan
Proposed Zoning Map Changes
The purpose of the proposed changes is to decrease the size of the M-1 Mixed Use Corridor, and
to rezone the majority of the CBD to M-2 Downtown Neighborhood District. Part of the rationale for
this change is that the M-1 District requires retail on the first floor of every building, at a minimum.
The M-2 District on the other hand allows both retail and higher density residential on the first floor,
allowing for greater flexibility of uses in the CBD. These proposed changes are shown on the next
page.
84
September 11, 2019
Centerville City Council
Page 5 of 10
RE: Downtown Zoning Updates
Current Zoning
Proposed Zoning
85
September 11, 2019
Centerville City Council
Page 6 of 10
RE: Downtown Zoning Updates
Zoning Code Text Changes
Changes are needed to the zoning code in order to maintain consistency with the Master Plan
and zoning map, as well as to remove unnecessary language and fix typographical errors. These
include the following changes which are summarized in part in the attached revised Table 156-A.1
in the Zoning Code, as well as in the attached draft ordinance:
(1)A typographical error will be fixed in Section 156.051 to reflect the correct term, Mixed Use
District (M-1).
(2)The Purpose statement of Sections 156.051(A) will be updated to clarify that the M-1 district
implements the Master Plan, and all subsequent revisions. This is important given the
proposed revisions to the Master Plan document.
(3)
must occupy the first floor of all building
requirements in the Master Plan.
(4)Unnecessary or redundant language will be removed from Section 156.051 (C) Special
requirements. Subpoint (5) regarding stormwater management will be removed and the
list will be renumbered accordingly.
(5)The Purpose statement of Sections 156.052(A) will be updated to clarify that the M-2 district
district implements the Master Plan, and all subsequent revisions. This is important given the
proposed revisions to the Master Plan document.
(6)Permitted uses in the M-2 (Section 156.052 (B)), will be updated to remove the statement
limiting the percentage of ground level or office space in corner lot structures.
(7)Unnecessary or redundant language will be removed from Section 156.052 (C) Special
requirements. Subpoint (6) regarding stormwater management will be removed and the
list will be renumbered accordingly
(8)Table 156.A.1 District Allowed Uses will be updated to allow residential, specialized and
day care facilities only by PUD.
86
September 11, 2019
Centerville City Council
Page 7 of 10
RE: Downtown Zoning Updates
Accessory Structures and Storage in the CBD
At the August 13 Planning and Zoning Commission meeting, there was a discussion of accessory
structures in the downtown. The consensus was that accessory structures should be allowed, with
reasonable conditions and restrictions. A related issue is whether storage or warehousing as a
separate use should be allowed within the principal structure, and how to better regulate this in
the zoning code. Please note the distinction between an accessory structure, which is a separate
structure on the site, and an accessory use, which is some use of space, but it could be in the
principal structure or in a separate accessory structure. The following are options to consider.
The Zoning Code currently does not allow accessory structures to be constructed in the M-1 and
M-2 districts. This is indicated in the zoning code table of uses for these districts by the absence of
a P or C in either the M-1 or M-2 columns across from Accessory Structures. In order to allow for
the M-1 and M-2 columns for the row listing accessory buildings. This would allow the Commission
and the Council to place reasonable conditions on the construction of accessory structures.
Accessory structures for residential uses are regulated by a list of conditions in the zoning code
structures in non-residential areas. However, the conditions and regulations placed on these
structures are much less stringent. One option could be to include a list of conditions in the zoning
code text for accessory structures in non-residential areas as well. Zoning Code section 156.107 is
already referenced in the Zoning Code table of uses, so any regulations added to the zoning
code text would be applied to accessory use structures in the M-1 and M-2, if they were to be
allowed. A list of proposed conditions is shown in the summary on the next page.
A related issue is whether storage should be allowed as a use within the principal structure.
Currently storage is allowed as a principal use in the I-1 industrial area. Mini storage is allowed as a
conditional use, and warehouse/distributing is allowed as a permitted use in I-1. Storage is not
allowed now as a principal use within the M-1 and M-2 downtown areas. Certainly, most typical
commercial uses within the M-1 and M-2 would have storage as an accessory use within the
principal structure. For example, restaurants typically have some amount of space that is used for
storing goods and equipment, but the principal use would not be considered storage. One could
say that the storage is accessory, and incidental to the principal use as a restaurant. Every office
use has some kind of storage space or closets, but it is also accessory or incidental.
This raises the question of how much space would be allowed as storage or warehousing within a
principal structure. The zoning code currently does not provide limitations on the amount of
warehouse or storage space within a principal use, although the storage could not be the
principal use under current code. We suggest that storage be indicated in the zoning code as a
permitted accessory use as long as it is directly related to and incidental to the principal use.
87
September 11, 2019
Centerville City Council
Page 8 of 10
RE: Downtown Zoning Updates
In summary, the proposed changes to the zoning code to address accessory structures and
storage in the downtown include:
(1)ssory buildings in the M-1 and M-2 districts,
indicating that accessory buildings are allowed as a conditional use.
(2)
that accessory storage is allowed within all
districts as a permitted use.
(3)Section 156.107 relating to accessory uses and structures will be updated with the following
conditions for non-residential accessory structures
a.No more than two detached accessory buildings are permitted on any parcel.
Combined aggregate square footage for detached accessory structures shall not
exceed 1000 square feet or 10% of the lot area, whichever is less
b.In no event may any accessory building exceed the square footage of the main
level of the principal structure.
c.No accessory structure may be constructed on a parcel without a principal
structure.
d.No accessory structure shall be erected or located within the front yard.
(4)
principal structure shall be directly related to and incidental to the principal use.
The attached ordinance shows the changes as they would appear within the City Zoning Code.
RECOMMENDATIONS
There are numerous individual changes being proposed, but there are four basic actions to be
taken:
1)We recommend the City Council approve of the draft ordinance amending the text and
table of uses for the M-1 and M-2 districts, and text regarding accessory structures and
storage.
2)We recommend that the City Council approve rezoning the following properties from M-1
to M-2, as illustrated in the map excerpts in this memo:
23-31-22-24-0026 7087 Progress Road
23-31-22-24-0040
88
September 11, 2019
Centerville City Council
Page 9 of 10
RE: Downtown Zoning Updates
23-31-22-24-0136 7085 Progress Road
23-31-22-21-0028 7128 Progress Road
23-31-22-21-0030
23-31-22-21-0051 1737 Main Street
23-31-22-21-0055 7124 Progress Road
23-31-22-21-0057 1751 Main Street
23-31-22-21-0058
23-31-22-23-0005
23-31-22-23-0006
23-31-22-23-0007
23-31-22-23-0008 7073 Centerville Road
23-31-22-23-0009
23-31-22-23-0010 1694 Sorel Street
23-31-22-23-0011 1688 Sorel Street
23-31-22-23-0014
23-31-22-23-0046 1688 Heritage Street
23-31-22-23-0047 7045 Centerville Road
23-31-22-24-0009 1716 Heritage Street
23-31-22-24-0010 7046 Centerville Road
23-31-22-24-0034 7072 Centerville Road
23-31-22-24-0035 7064 Centerville Road
23-31-22-24-0036 7056 Centerville Road
23-31-22-22-0032
23-31-22-23-0068 7087 Goiffon Road
3)
OPTIONS
For each of the actions and recommendations above the City Council can:
1)Move to approve and adopt Findings in support of the motion;
2)Move to deny and adopt Findings in support of the motion; or
3)Move to continue the item(s) for further discussion or to gather additional information.
FINDINGS OF FACT
If the City Council moves to approve the actions above, the following Findings of Fact could be
cited in support of those decisions.
89
September 11, 2019
Centerville City Council
Page 10 of 10
RE: Downtown Zoning Updates
(1)The City wants to maintain a mixed-use Central Business District with a balance of retail
and moderately dense residential housing. Given these priorities, updating the standards
for the mixed use and downtown neighborhood districts is reasonable and appropriate.
(2)With the updated standards to the M-1 and M-2 districts, it is necessary to rezone properties
to be consistent with guided land use. Updating the zoning map is therefore both
reasonable and appropriate.
(3)The Master Plan & Development Guidelines for Downtown Centerville is a document that
was adopted by the City Council in 2006. Over time, some of the language and standards
in the document have changed, and therefore it is reasonable and appropriate to update
the document.
(4)The Zoning Code directly references the Master Plan & Development Guidelines for
Downtown Centerville document, and therefore text changes to the zoning code are also
reasonable and appropriate.
(5)Attractive, high quality development in Downtown Centerville is an important goal of the
City and large or unsightly storage uses are inappropriate. Limiting accessory structures
and storage uses in the M-1 and M-2 districts with reasonable regulations is therefore
reasonable and appropriate.
90
Purpose
Permitted uses.
Special Requirements.
91
Purpose.
Permitted Uses.
92
Special Requirements.
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102