The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2020-02-26 CC Packet CITY OF CENTERVILLE COUNCIL WORK SESSION, MEETING & CLOSED EXECUTIVE SESSION AGENDA Wednesday, February 26, 2020 5:00/6:30 p.m. COUNCIL WORK SESSION (5:00 PM) CALL TO ORDER Roll Call ITEMS OF DISCUSSION Metro I-Net JPA Stormwater Fund Rebranding Roll-out Plan ADJOURNMENT COUNCIL MEETING (6:30 PM) CALL TO ORDER Roll Call PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE APPROVAL OF AGENDA APPOINTMENTS/PRESENTATIONS None PUBLIC HEARING APPROVAL OF MINUTES CONSENT AGENDA City of Centerville February 12, 2020 through February 26, 2020 Claims (Check #(pg. ) Centennial Lake Police Department Claims through February 18, 2020 (Check #13076-13088) & Payroll Check #13074-13075 (pg. ) Centennial Fire District Claims thru February 11, 2020 (Check #8742-8751) TASC & US Bank (pg. ) Mediation & Restorative Services Request for Funding (pg.) Sprinkler) OLD BUSINESS 2020 Downtown Street & Utility Project Adopting Assessment Roll LaMotte Park Stormwater Irrigation Project Approve Plans Authorize Advertisement for Bids NEW BUSINESS Resolution #20-0XX - Supporting Infrastructure Accountability 2020 Goals COUNCIL/ADMINISTRATOR ANNOUNCEMENTS Administrator/Engineer Report 3.Council Reports a.Lakso Parks and Recreation Committee Anoka County Fire Protection Council Fire Steering Committee b.Love Police Governing Board Economic Development Authority c.Koski Planning & Zoning Commission Fire Steering Committee d.Montain North Metro Telecommunications Commission e.Paar Police Governing Board Economic Development Authority Other Mayoral Reports XI.RECESS TO CLOSED EXECUTIVE SESSIONS The following portion of the meeting is closed to discuss two separate matters. The first is protected by the attorney-client privilege pertaining to a lawsuit commenced by John C. Kelly & Jolene R. Kelly against the city. The closure is pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 13D.05 Subdivision 3(b). This second is closed to evaluate the performance of City Administrator/Engineer Mark Statz. The closure is pursuant to Minnesota Statute Section 13D.05, subdivision 3(a). CLOSED EXECUTIVE SESSION 1 I.CALL TO ORDER 1.Roll Call II.ITEMS OF DISCUSSION 1.John C. Kelly & Jolene R. Kelly vs. City of Centerville III.ADJOURNMENT CLOSED EXECUTIVE SESSION 2 I.CALL TO ORDER 1.Roll Call II.ITEMS OF DISCUSSION 1.Performance Review, City Administrator Mark Statz III.ADJOURNMENT COUNCIL MEETING (Continued) XII.RECONVENE TO REGULARLY SCHEDULED COUNCIL MEETING XIII.ADJOURNMENT INFORMATIONAL MATERIAL None REMINDERS Presidential Nomination Primary Absentee/Early Voting Starts Frid ELECTION DAY s Community Parish Center, 7:00 change due to election** City Manager’s Office Memo To: Metro I-Net Members cc: Pete Bauer & Jason Swalley, Metro I-Net From: Patrick Trudgeon, Roseville City Manager Date: February 13, 2020 Re: Metro I-Net Discussion Points Metro I-Net originally started as a collaboration between Roseville and Mounds View to share IT resources in 1999. Since that time, Metro I-Net has grown to 35 member organizations receiving full IT services and 9 associate members receiving limited IT services. Not only has the number of Metro I-Net members grown, each member agency’s needs have grown exponentially. Some examples in recent years include the deployment of laser fiche, remote computer access, electronic door access, wireless access points, as well as body cam support for law enforcement. Currently, Metro I-Net is under organizational control of the Roseville City Manager and Roseville City Council. All Metro I-Net employees are actually Roseville employees and fall under Roseville personnel policy, its liability coverage, and compensation structure. The Roseville City Manager makes employment decisions for Metro I-Net including the hiring and termination of employees. The City of Roseville includes the $3.5 million Metro I-Net budget as part of its city budget. While this arrangementhas worked for many years, the following issues is making it harder to keep Metro I-Net sustainable into the future: Roseville City Council concern about the amount of Metro I-Net staff and the added liability and carrying costs for that amount of employees Roseville City Council concern the use of space within City given other city department space needs The Roseville employee compensation plan lags behind the market for other local governments and especially with LOGIS, a joint powers entity that provides IT services to many local governments in the Twin Cities. LOGIS has recruited several Metro I-Net staff members over the past couple of years As a result of the Roseville compensation plan and organizational structure, it is not possible to create the necessary executive leadership to guide the large $3.5 million Metro I-Net enterprise Finally, it should be noted that the Roseville City Council could at any time decide to no longer be the lead agency for Metro I-Net and a result, breakup Metro I-Netand let members figure out how to best provide IT services for their organization. It should be pointed out that Roseville City Council has not discussed doing this, but it is always a potential concern in the future. Having Metro I-Net as a joint powers entity does provide members more direct control over governance of Metro I-Net, including costs, personnel, and policies and takes away uncertainty of the future of Metro I-Net. The highlights of the joint powers agreement, as currently contemplated, are as follows: • The initial members of the JPA will be the current members of Metro I-Net • JPA is planned to become effective on 1/1/2021 • Metro I-Net will be governed by a Board of Directors with each member having a Director and Alternate designated • Metro I-Net board meetings subject to open meeting law • Each member will have the number of votes equivalent to its share of the budget • Members will not be allowed to vote if they are in default of their financial obligation or violation of IT security policies • Metro I-Net board will meet at least four times (Jan., April, July, Oct.) annually • Metro I-Net board will have officers elected to 3-year terms • Metro I-Net board will have power take all action in establishing and managing the operations of Metro I-Net • Metro I-Net board will enter into a contract with a member to serve as the fiscal and operations agent for the organization • Metro I-Net board will hire an executive director who will be responsible for day-to- day operations • The executive director will have broad authority to run the operations of Metro I-Net • The executive director can be terminated by a 2/3 vote of the Metro I-Net board • The Metro I-Net board will establish an executive committee consisting of the 4 board officers and the member serving as the fiscal agent •The executive committee would meet on a more frequent basis and work on duties as assigned by the board such as the budget and administrative issues • The JPA outlines the schedule for the creation and consideration of the annual budget. • The JPA creates 3 different classes of charges •Class 1 –Annual personnel & other operating expenses • Class 2 - Capital charges for hardware and software • Class 3 – Necessary additional charges •The JPA outlines procedures for members to withdraw from Metro I-Net •JPA creates a Metro I-Net “Associate” which is an entity that is receivinga contractual service from Metro I-Net • The JPA has no termination date but does outline procedures to dissolve the organization Page 2 The new organizational structure will increase the costs for each member. The exact costs have not been determined yet and is highly dependent on the number of members that join the JPA. If all current members remain as members of the JPA, it is estimated that each member, including Roseville, would see an increase of 5% over the 2020 cost. At this point, Roseville is seeking a commitment by your governing board to enter into a Metro I-Net joint powers agreement, subject to final review and approval of the JPA document. This will allow us to proceed in completing the drafting of the JPA and have an assurance on the costs to create the new entity. Page 3 2020BUDGETSUMMARY AnnualAnnualHardwareSoftware PersonnelOperatingCapitalCapital TOTAL ChargeChargeChargeCharge CPCirclePines FTE0.2032,598$$8,307$2,711$2,990$46,605 A1USERSUPPORT2,434$$437$250$31$3,151 A2COMPUTERSUPPORT11,340$$67$386$17$11,810 A3EXCHANGEEMAILSUPPORT1,654$$686$218$125$2,683 A4WINDOWSSERVERSUPPORT9,504 $$302$14$38$9,859 A5NETWORKSYSTEMSUPPORT2,227$$104$$35$2,366 A6LAN/WAN686$$1,435$125$250$2,496 V01CISCOTELEPHONY1,782$$907$292$1,045$4,026 S01ADOBESUBSCRIPTIONS$$2,615$$$2,615 S02MOBILITYSERVICES430$$54$10$110$604 S03OPENPROGRAM$$$$$ S04LASERFICHE635$$1,501$185$32$2,353 S05MILESTONEVMS$$$$$ S06ARBITRATORVPU/BWC$$$$$ S07FACILITYWIFI31$$39$26$$96 S08vSAN1,875$$158$1,205$1,307$4,545 S09S2CARDACCESS$$$$$ S10CISCOSMARTNET$$$$$ S11FIBERMAINTENANCE$$$$$ S12OPENPROGRAM$$$$$ S13LETGRMS$$$$$ 9,7385,8006,7823,264 98,47940,92947,69220,09964,10065,24833,80870,41162,05055,42072,87925,01179,44216,83634,60948,68093,91432,91465,92225,70349,86721,81969,91723,49116,10317,46674,549 Annual 416,865198,297102,988112,448285,682198,408104,672312,151364,807887,090234,332172,777156,499 Overhead $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ with 932 2,7825,7431,6579,6591,9387,1464,8109,8889,4047,3446,2346,7124,6014,990 28,13711,69413,62618,31418,64220,11717,72856,65615,83420,82329,42522,69832,12813,90981,62426,83356,68829,90618,83514,24889,18619,97666,95249,36544,71421,300 119,104104,231253,455 FundedIncrease $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ 75%40% 9,1295,4386,3583,060 92,32438,37144,71118,84360,09461,17031,69566,01058,17251,95768,32496,55123,44874,47615,78332,44645,63888,04430,85798,13061,80224,09746,75020,45565,54722,02315,09716,37469,890 390,811185,903105,420267,827186,008292,642342,007831,647219,686161,978146,717 AnnualIncreaseTotal Overhead $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ with 729 9,1362,1744,4861,2957,5461,5145,5833,7587,7257,3475,7374,8705,2443,5953,899 21,98293,05010,64614,30814,56415,71713,85044,26312,37116,26822,98817,73325,10010,86663,76820,96344,28823,36414,71511,13169,67781,43015,60652,30638,56634,93316,640 FundedIncrease 198,012 $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ 80%31% 8,1154,8345,6522,720 82,06634,10839,74316,74953,41754,37328,17358,67651,70846,18460,73285,82320,84266,20114,03093,70728,84140,56778,26227,42987,22654,93521,41941,55618,18258,26419,57613,41914,55562,124 AnnualIncreaseTotal347,387165,247238,068165,340260,126304,006739,242195,276143,981130,415 Overhead $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ with 691807389 4,8731,1595,6782,3937,6317,7684,0258,3827,3876,5988,6762,9779,4572,0044,1205,7953,9187,8483,0605,9372,5978,3232,7971,9172,0798,875 11,72412,26013,38711,18012,461 49,62723,60734,01023,62037,16143,43027,89720,56918,631 105,606 FundedIncrease $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ 90%17% 7,3044,3505,0872,448 73,85930,69735,76915,07548,07548,93625,35652,80846,53741,56554,65977,24118,75859,58112,62784,33625,95736,51070,43624,68678,50449,44219,27737,40016,36452,43817,61812,07813,09955,912 312,649148,723214,262148,806234,113273,605665,318175,749129,583117,374 AnnualIncreaseTotal Overhead $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ with 348718207242893601918779839117575624 3,5171,4621,7032,2892,3301,2072,5152,2167,0821,9792,6033,6782,8374,0161,2361,7393,3541,1767,0863,7382,3541,7812,4978,3696,1715,5892,662 14,88810,20311,14813,02931,682 Funded Increase $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ $$$$$$ 100%5%IncreaseTotal JPA 175,000 $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ Overhead 2.0%3,5178.5%14,8880.8%1,4620.2%3481.0%1,7030.4%7180.1%2071.3%2,2891.3%2,3300.7%1,2071.4%2,5151.3%2,2164.0%7,0821.1%1,9790.1%2421.5%2,6032.1%3,6780.0%0.5%8931.6%2,8370.3%6012.3%4,0160.7%1,2361.0%1,73 95.8%10,2031.9%3,3540.7%1,1764.0%7,0862.1%3,7381.3%2,3540.5%9181.0%1,7816.4%11,1487.4%13,0290.4%7790.0%1.4%2,4974.8%8,3690.5%8390.1%1173.5%6,1713.2%5,5890.3%5750.4%6241.5%2,662 of 18.1%31,682 % Budget 6,9564,1434,8452,331 TOTAL 70,34229,23534,06614,35745,78646,60524,14850,29444,32139,58652,05673,56317,86556,74412,02580,32024,72134,77267,08123,51074,76547,08718,35935,61915,58549,94116,77911,50212,47553,249 297,760141,641204,058141,720222,965260,576633,636167,380123,412111,785 3,499,968 $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ 2020 91 645726216899640396 3,9943,9791,5721,3322,7022,9901,5793,0772,4387,5452,8213,2771,3244,3683,8781,4811,7933,7552,4881,4573,4997,0821,6652,3242,5358,2596,2211,9303,645 15,02410,60812,70610,25217,09916,47732,71612,139 Capital Charge $225,646 Software $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ 7949 422963184994705898792954259685 4,6951,0311,3821,6532,7111,4981,8172,2257,8782,5573,1273,9182,8923,9651,3143,4211,1988,7104,2221,0031,5392,1555,6185,7592,962 18,00213,14416,74413,39535,63610,554 11,601 Capital Charge $205,313 $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ Hardware 757423841261820 1,6021,4804,2808,3073,0985,6256,5772,0201,5239,1962,4492,2858,3433,3064,8602,3498,7467,9261,0916,479 11,14732,59910,45110,31519,59511,01610,39114,07824,23617,11210,68213,54425,22211,86723,41012,84813,759 27,788 501,336 106,629 Charge Annual $ $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ Operating AnnualCharge Personnel $2,567,673 $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ Cable5,364 Police2,915 Police37,151 Police1,625 Cable17,037 NAME Library4,382Sheriff Watershed10,332 Police18,366 Fire29,795 ID Fire8,898 Watershed29,509 Park Lake8,770Twp40,162 Fire10,581LakesWatershed35,517 Village5,131 HeightsFair Paul167,098 View105,646 Washington Heights86,046Lakes CountyCounty Heights29,343 Lake106,622JLECLake Hills50,505BearBear Oaks13,550SuburbanSt. Pines32,598 Creek Canada35,406Canada Anthony121,276Francis96,686 Lake3,604 Lake39,532 Elmo63,281Johanna Bethel39,774Lakes153,972 State ArdenAnoka232,137Blaine13,774BirchwoodCoonCentennialColumbiaCentennialCircleCenterville17,973EastFalconForestFridley15,404GemHamHugo55,977AnokaLauderdale13,526LittleLittleLakeLexington19,477LakeLinoM ahtomedi51,562MNMoundsMaplewood30,241MississippiNorthNorthNorthOakdale214,877RamseyRamseyRoseville458,655RWMWD33,595SaintRamseySpringSaintVadnaisVadnaisWhiteWhite LL FL LE LC CPEBGLHLSA FH BVCVRV CH AHVH FRDNO SLPSTF LEXMVRW RCL RCSSCC BLNCFDNSP LAU MWOAK JLEC LJFD VLMWBL ANO WBT CCW LCFD MAH CLPD NSAC AIDAGENCY HUGO MSFPD MWMO Memorandum Date: February 26, 2020 To: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members Through: Mark R. Statz, City Administrator/City Engineer From: Bruce DeJong, Finance Director Item: Storm Water Fund Capital Improvement Plan CIP Discussion City staff would like to continue the discussion regarding the Storm Water Fund cash flow with the City Council. Staff has included two large sheets listing all revenues and expenditures for cash flow purposes. There are significant assumptions included in the documents, so we will lay them out for discussion purposes. Storm Water charges are held steady in Scenario 1. Storm Water Charges increase by 4% per year in Scenario 2. Storm Water Charges increase by 5% per year in Scenario 3. Interest income is projected at 1% of the previous year ending balance. All other expenses are estimated for 2019 and inflated by 3% for each year after. CIP Cash Outlay is included in the cash flow since it is actual cash outlay. It statements. In accrual accounting, the purchase of a new capital item is the exchange of one asset (cash) for another asset (infrastructure). The expense is recognized on the financial statements through the depreciation calculated over the projected life of the asset. Pension Expense and Depreciation are excluded from the cash flow analysis since they are non-cash expenses. Depreciation is currently just under $105,000 annually and is adjusted in the future calculations to reflect new capital outlays depreciated over 20-40 years. This fund has a lot of assets that are difficult to determine a maintenance schedule. We have little information on which to determine an average level of pond sedimentation. The speed at which city ditches fill up is not clear and can be easily disrupted by neighborhood actions such as leaf or yard waste dumping. Rain gardens have not worked very well in town due to a generally high water table. Replacement of the filtering media may have no effect on percolation. Some of the storm water ponds have been measured during winter to determine the amount of sedimentation. The ponds that have been measured have not shown any significant change in depth or storage capacity. Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4) rules indicate a pond is non-functioning if it is below 50% of design capacity. None of our measured ponds are below that level. Even when they are below 50%, the ific maintenance. Public Wo believe we should perform much, if any, maintenance on ponds until they are below 30% capacity. It is difficult to determine when city ditc need to be dredged or deepened. We did a Sewer Service. The length of the project was 140 feet and the bid was $4,912. That works out to about $35 per foot. That bid was about half of the other bid received, so the cost may not be representative for other projects. Staff has used a price of $40 per foot for estimating ditch maintenance costs. Rain gardens will likely fill great handle on how long that happens on average. Since the percolation has been very poor in the rain gardens that have been installed, it may not make sense to reconstruct gardens will not be required in the future by Rice Creek Watershed District (RCWD), so we have not budgeted to replace the existing ones. The legal standard regarding when we need to test sediment removed from these water features is when 3,000 cubic yards of material are removed. The testing is to determine if Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs) primarily from coal tar based driveway sealers are present. It is ss that that amount annually to avoid the necessity of testing. Staff has reviewed the original spreadsheet and found a couple of errors. We are researching how we ended up with two ponds numbered 94 and 95. Re-sorting the ponds shows that we have 78 public ponds of which 6 are dry. Staff estimates a cost of $2,000 as an average to remove sediment from the inlet and outlet of each wet pond. We plan to do maintenance to each of the 72 public wet ponds during a 10 year period. That leads us to a total of $144,000 for all ponds or an average of $14,400 per year. Staff would plan to start a regular pond maintenance program in 2021. Staff estimates a cost of $40 per foot as an average to remove sediment from ditches. We plan to do maintenance to each of the 14 ditches during a 10 year period. That leads us to a total of $268,500 for all ditches or an average of $26,850 per year. Staff would plan to start a regular ditch maintenance program in 2021. These assumptions are predicated on not having to completely reconstruct any storm water feature. The standard rule of thumb for a minimum cash balance in an enterprise fund is something between three to six months of operating expenses in reserve. The estimated annual operating expenditures of the fund starting in 2021 are around $90,000. Holding three months of expenses in reserves means $22,500 should be kept for cash flow purposes. The actual cash on hand at year end 2018 was $266,237. This means that there is an available balance of $240,000 available for capital projects. In 2020, the downtown storm water project associated with the street reconstruction and water main is estimated to cost $341,000. We also have to provide a 25% match of the total project amount for our $100,000 Storm Water grant from the Metropolitan Council. Total project cost is estimated to be $133,000 for the expansion of the LaMotte Park sprinkler system 25% of that equals $33,000. After 2020, there are no major projects planned in the next 10 years. In all three scenarios, pond and ditch maintenance begins in 2021. Scenario 1: With the above expenses included, we are projected to go below our target cash amount of $22,500 in 2020, and actually go negative in cash for 2026 and beyond. In Scenario 1, we never get back to our minimum cash balance amount. This indicates that some level of increase in the storm water rates is needed. Scenario 2: Staff projects a 4% increase in storm water fees on all users starting in mid-2020. With that assumption, we drop below our cash target in 2020, but get back over our 25% minimum cash balance in 2021. The cash balance keeps rising until it 2024 when we can start to address backyard ponding issues. Scenario 3: Staff projects a 5% increase in storm water fees on all users starting in mid-2020. With that assumption, we drop below our cash target in 2020, but get back over our 25% minimum cash balance in 2021. We can also start to address backyard ponding issues in 2021. Staff presents this information in anticipation of discussions for setting enterprise fund rates for future years. We will need to annually evaluate our rates based on any increases needed due to changes in MS4 requirements. We should be able to make these adjustments annually without a significant impact to residents. Rd.) CV EDA verified 3 logo) not Ave., P&R, Spring)one Eagle) 6 Cost Creek) 20th & for verified P&Z,St., Hidden 7Cornerstone)Acorn south) signs) $10k not & && x2, Main signs) Meadows Cost (west, staff (deduct 9 (along (Green(LaMotte(Trailside(McBride(Royal(remaining (east) KLM installed versions 2015 Costin verified; from verifiedverifiedverifiedverifiedverifiedverifiedverifiedverifiedverifiedverified price, ea down Entrance not notnotnotnotnotnotnotnotnotnot by YearNotes Cost Rebranding Cost to Rebranding 0 Attributable No Yes 1 by Year $3,000$0$3,000$0 $3,000$0 Cost $24,150$12,150$53,000$3,000$87,400$2,400 Cost CostTotal etc.20201$1,000$1,0001$1,000Cost Costs 2025 etc.)202024$25$6001$600Costs cards, in and bus. council, Plan Tower Signs20205$250$1,2501$1,250Cost (Staff, Sign20201$3,500$3,5001$3,500Quoted Water Rollout envelopes, Chambers20201$2,000$2,0000$0Cost Monument20211$50,000$50,0000$0GrandMonument20252$20,000$40,0000$0Scaled 1 Entrance ShirtsMagnets202016$50$8001$800Cost CC Tower20251$45,000$45,0000$0Estimate Signs2020100$20$2,0001$2,000$18.82Signs2025120$20$2,4001$2,400Cost 2020 Design20191$3,000$3,0001$3,000Approvedin Signs20212$1,500$3,0001$3,000CostSigns20222$1,500$3,0000$0CostSigns20232$1,500$3,0000$0CostSigns20242$1,500$3,0000$0Cost RebrandingScenarioItemYearQuantityUnit2019 LogoLogoedVehicleStationary,StreetReaderboardLogoHighwayWebsite20201$10,000$10,0000$0Cost 2021 ParkEntrance 2022 Park 2023 Park 2024 Park 2025 StreetWaterEntrance Totals$173,550$17,550 Rd.) CV EDA verified 3 logo) not Ave., P&R, Spring) Eagle) 6 Cost Creek) 20th & second verified St., P&Z, for Hidden 7Cornerstone)Acorn south) signs) not & && x2, Main $10k signs) Meadows Cost (west, staff (add 9 (along (Green(LaMotte(Trailside(McBride(Royal(remaining (east) KLM installed versions 2015 in Cost verified; from verifiedverifiedverifiedverifiedverifiedverifiedverifiedverifiedverifiedverified price, ea down Entrance not notnotnotnotnotnotnotnotnotnot by YearNotes Cost Rebranding Cost to Rebranding 0 Attributable No Yes 1 by Year $3,000$0$3,000$0$3,000$0 Cost $59,150$47,150$53,000$3,000$42,400$2,400 Cost CostTotal etc.20201$1,000$1,0001$1,000Cost Costs etc.)202024$25$6001$600Costs cards, 2020 and bus. council, Plan Tower Signs20205$250$1,2501$1,250Cost (Staff, Sign20201$3,500$3,5001$3,500Quoted Water Rollout envelopes, Chambers20201$2,000$2,0000$0Cost Monument20211$50,000$50,0000$0GrandMonument20252$20,000$40,0000$0Scaled 2 Entrance ShirtsMagnets202016$50$8001$800Cost CC Tower20201$35,000$35,0001$35,000Estimate Signs2020100$20$2,0001$2,000$18.82Signs2025120$20$2,4001$2,400Cost 2020 Design20191$3,000$3,0001$3,000Approvedin Signs20212$1,500$3,0001$3,000CostSigns20222$1,500$3,0000$0CostSigns20232$1,500$3,0000$0CostSigns20242$1,500$3,0000$0Cost RebrandingScenarioItemYearQuantityUnit2019 LogoLogoedVehicleStationary,StreetReaderboardLogoHighwayWaterWebsite20201$10,000$10,0000$0Cost 2021 ParkEntrance 2022 Park 2023 Park 2024 Park 2025 StreetEntrance Totals$163,550$52,550 CITY OF CENTERVILLE REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION Agenda Item # Department: Requested Council Meeting Date: February 26, 2020 Engineering/Public Works IV.1 TITLE OF ISSUE: Public Hearing (Assessment Hearing) - Downtown Street and Utility Improvements BACKGROUND AND SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION: Previously, the city council held a Public Improvement Hearing to take input on the scope and timing of the Downtown Street and Utility Improvements Project. Since that time, plans and specs were completed and bidding was conducted. The results of those bids are in line with the costs contemplated in the Feasibility Study. Therefore, if the Council wishes to move forward with the construction and assessment of the project, the next step is to hold a Public Assessment Hearing. At this hearing, you will take input on assessment amounts, methodology, payment terms and the like. Individuals may also appeal their individual assessments and ask questions about how they were calculated. COST AND SOURCE(S) OF FUNDING: N/A REQUESTED COUNCIL ACTION: Hold a Public Assessment Hearing on the proposed 2020 Downtown Street and Utility Improvements Project. Once the hearing is closed, formal action on the assessments is scheduled for later on the agenda. SUPPORTED DOCUMENTS ATTACHED Motion By: ____________________________________ Resolution Ordinance Contract Minutes Plan Map Second By: ____________________________________ Vote Record: Aye Nay _____ _____ Other (specify) ____________ _____ _____ Love _____ _____ Paar _______________________________________________________________ _____ _____ Koski _____ _____ Montain _______________________________________________________________ Administration Department Use: Refer to: _________________________________ Consent Tabled Until: ______________________________ Regular Other: ___________________________________ CENTENNIAL LAKES POLICE DEPTCheck Register - Police GL without invoice numbersPage: 1 Check Issue Dates: 2/8/2020 - 2/18/2020Feb 18, 2020 09:44AM Report Criteria: Report type: Summary GLCheckCk NoDescriptionCheck PeriodIssue DatePayeeAmount 02/2002/18/202013076ASPEN MILLS, INCTRL-1 RAIL MOUNT LIGHT297.70 02/2002/18/202013077CWKK CrimeDexLAW ENFORCEMENT SUBSCRIPTION79.00 02/2002/18/202013078CENTENNIAL UTILITIESJAN UTILITIES688.99 02/2002/18/202013079CENTURY LINKCOMMUNICATIONS FEB120.00 02/2002/18/202013080CONNEXUS ENERGYELECTRIC JANUARY3,047.61 02/2002/18/202013081CONSOLIDATED COMMUNICATIONSPHONES FEB394.05 02/2002/18/202013082DELL MARKETING L.P.LATITUDE 5424 COMPUTER & DOCKI2,497.16 02/2002/18/202013083DON'S CIRCLE SERVICEVEHICLE REPAIRS & MTC1,609.54 02/2002/18/202013084HOLIDAY COMPANIESFUEL JANUARY2,821.41 02/2002/18/202013085NEAL A. NORENBLDG MTC HOURS JAN90.00 02/2002/18/202013086OFFICE OF MN IT SERVICESWAN SERVICES JANUARY43.20 02/2002/18/202013087OPTUMMONTHLY SERVICE FEE JANUARY22.50 02/2002/18/202013088TRANSUNION RISK & ALTERNATIVEINVESTIGATION EXPENSES JAN50.00 Grand Totals:11,761.16 M = Manual Check, V = Void Check CITY OF CENTERVILLE REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION Agenda Item # Department: Requested Council Meeting Date: February 26, 2020 Public Work VII.5 TITLE OF ISSUE: Public Works Building Sprinkler System required maintenance BACKGROUND AND SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION: We recently had our fire sprinkler contractor perform an annual fire sprinkler inspection of the public works building. The inspector noted several deficiencies including the lack of a (5) year inspection. The fire sprinkler systems must be checked every (5) years for obstructions (clogs, corrosion, etc) in the piping and gauges replaced. Attached is a (5) year maintenance agreement. Our inspector also noted that there was a few minor with the recommended repairs and inspection. Two quotes were not sought, because of the limited number of companies performing this type of work and the familiarity of Summit with our existing system. COST AND SOURCE(S) OF FUNDING: Public Works REQUESTED COUNCIL ACTION: Request approval of the two proposals. SUPPORTED DOCUMENTS ATTACHED Motion By: ____________________________________ Resolution Ordinance Contract Minutes Plan Map Second By: ____________________________________ Vote Record: Aye Nay _____ _____ Quotes Other (specify) ____________ _____ _____ Love _____ _____ Paar _______________________________________________________________ _____ _____ Koski _____ _____ Montain _______________________________________________________________ Administration Department Use: Refer to: _________________________________ Consent Tabled Until: ______________________________ Regular Other: ___________________________________ 5 Year Internal Pipe Inspection Corporate OfficeBranch Offices Arizona, Iowa, Michigan, 575 Minnehaha Ave Minnesota, Nebraska, Nevada St. Paul, Minnesota 55103 North Dakota, Texas, Wisconsin 2/18/2020 Date: Summit Companies ("Summit") is presenting an Inspection Service Agreement ("Agreement"), in accordance with the State Fire code including the items indicated below. CLIENTINSPECTION LOCATION Name:City of Centerville Public Works Building Name: Address:1880 Main Street2085 West Cedar Street Address: Centerville, MN 55038Centerville, MN 55038 Contact:Dan Schmitz Contact 1: Phone:651-429-4750 Cell:Phone:Cell: E-mail: Contact 2: A/R Email: Phone: 5 YEAR INTERNAL PIPE INSPECTION NFPA CHAPTER 25: DECRIPTION OF WORK Gauges shall be replaced every 5 years or tested every 5 years by comparison with a calibrated gauge. 5.3.2.1 & 5.3.2.2 Gauges not accurate to with 3% of the full scale shall be recalibrated/replaced Underground and exposed piping shall be flow tested to determine the internal condition of the piping at a 7.3.1 minimum 5 year intervals. Check valves shall be inspected internally every 5 years to verify that all components operate correctly, 13.4.2.1 move freely, and are in good condition. Strainers, filters, restricted orifices ,and diaphragm chambers shall be inspected internally every (5) 13.4.3.1.8 years unless test indicates a greater frequency is necessary. An inspection of piping and branch line conditions shall be conducted every (5) years by opening a 14.2.1 flushing connection at the end of (1) main and by removing a sprinkler toward the end of (1) branch line for the purpose of inspecting for the presence of foreign organic and inorganic material. In buildings having multiple wet pipe systems, every other system shall have an internal inspection of piping 14.2.2 5 years as described in 14.2.1 NFPA CHAPTER 25: EXCLUSIONS are Tax, Lift Rental (if Required) and the following: Tubercules or slime, if found shall be tested for the indications of microbiologically influenced corrosion 14.2.1.2 If the presence of sufficient foreign organic or inorganic material is found to obstruct pipe or sprinklers, an 14.2.1.3 obstruction investigation shall be conducted. BREAKDOWN OF SYTEMS AND VAULES Wet Systems$840Genie Lift Rental$300 11 Wet Gauges$25 1 January Month of Service Total Investment:$1,165 Ў ǤĻğƩƭ 2 Years 3 Years Term:This agreement covers the next (5) years. 1 Year ACCEPTANCE: This Agreement is limited to INSPECTION SERVICE ONLY performed in accordance with the State Fire code as 2/18/20202/16/2025 From:Thru: indicated by items checked above. Any additional maintenance, repairs or alterations will be made only upon receipt of such orders by an Client or Summit may terminate this Agreement by giving 30 days authorized person, at Summit's prevailing rates. Payment is due 10 days written notice. from date of billing. Service is contingent on completion of credit This offer may be withdrawn if not accepted within 30 days. application or credit card information being submitted to Accounts Receivable Department. Phone: 651-251-1880 or Fax: 651-251-1879. Presented By: akovala@SummitCoUs.com Andrew Kovala GENERAL CONDITIONS: The General Conditions attached to this Summit Companies Agreement are incorporated herein and made a part of this Agreement. Inspection Sales Representative Upon acceptance of this Agreement by Client, the General Conditions will automatically be part of this Agreement between Summit and Client. Direct Phone: 651-251-1848 Fax: (651) 251-1879 The above prices, specifications and conditions, and the attached General Contract Acceptance: Conditions, are hereby accepted. Summit is authorized to perform the work as specified. Client acknowledges that he/she has read and understands this Client: Agreement. Signature:Date: PARTIES: Summit Companies is a d/b/a of: Summit Fire Protection Co.; Minnesota Conway Fire & Safety, Inc., a Minnesota Corporation(s). Summit Companies is a d/b/a of: St. Cloud Fire Equipment Co., a Delaware Corporation. See General Conditions on Page 2. Page 1 of 2 SUMMIT COMPANIES INSPECTION SERVICE AGREEMENT GENERAL CONDITIONS shall have the same meanings as those terms have in the Inspection Service Agreement. 1. Payment If Client fails to pay the Fees within ten (10) days after the date the same is due and payable, Client shall automatically be assessed and shall pay a late charge equivalent to three percent (3%) of the amount of such late payment, together with interest on such late payment at the lower of the maximum rate allowed by applicable law or the rate of eighteen percent (18%) per annum. 2. Changes. Any changes to the Services to be provided by Summit during the term of the Agreement are to be documented by a written change order or amendment signed by Summit and Client, which may include, among other terms, a change in the Fees. 3. Taxes. Any taxes or other governmental charges related to the Agreement shall be paid by Client to Summit and shall be in addition to the Fees. 4. Unavoidable Delays. To the extent any time period for performance by Summit applies, Summit shall not be responsible for any delays due to federal, state or municipal actions or regulations, strikes or other labor shortages, equipment or other materials delays or shortages, acts or omissions of Client, or any other events or causes beyond the control of Summit. 5. Access. Client shall allow Summit to have reasonable access to the job location to allow the performance of the Services on the dates and at the times requested by Summit personnel. 6. MECHANIC LIEN NOTICE. YOU ARE ENTITLED UNDER MINNESOTA LAW TO THE FOLLOWING NOTICE: (a) ANY PERSON OR COMPANY SUPPLYING LABOR OR MATERIALS FOR THIS IMPROVEMENT TO YOUR PROPERTY MAY FILE A LIEN AGAINST YOUR PROPERTY IF THAT PERSON OR COMPANY IS NOT PAID FOR THEIR CONTRIBUTIONS. (b) UNDER MINNESOTA LAW, YOU HAVE THE RIGHT TO PAY PERSONS WHO SUPPLIED LABOR OR MATERIALS FOR THIS IMPROVEMENT DIRECTLY AND DEDUCT THIS AMOUNT FROM OUR CONTRACT PRICE, OR WITHHOLD THE AMOUNTS DUE THEM FROM US UNTIL 120 DAYS AFTER COMPLETION OF THE IMPROVEMENT UNLESS WE GIVE YOU A LIEN WAIVER SIGNED BY PERSONS WHO SUPPLIED ANY 7. Limitation of Liability and Remedies. The Services are not an insurance policy or a substitute for an insurance policy. The amount paid by Client for the Services is not sufficient for Summit to assume liability for loss or damage except as expressly set forth in this Agreement. In the event of any breach, default or negligence by Summit under this Agreement, Client agrees that the maximum liability of Summit shall not exceed $500.00 or an amount equal to the Fees, whichever is greater, and Client expressly waives any right to make any claim in excess of that amount. Further, Client waives any right to any claims for punitive, exemplary or consequential damages. Client shall provide Summit with reasonable notice of any claim and a reasonable opportunity to cure any alleged breach or default. Client shall indemnify, defend and hold Summit harmless from and against claims, actions, costs and expenses, including reasonable legal fees and costs, arising out of any injury, death or damage occurring on or about the job site unless caused by the gross negligence or willful misconduct of Summit. 8. . If Client fails to pay any amount due to Summit as and when required, Summit shall have the right, but not the obligation, to immediately discontinue performing any Services and Summit may pursue any and all other rights and remedies, including the right to place a lien against the job site. In addition, Client shall be obligated to reimburse Summit for all reasonable legal fees and costs incurred by Summit in the enforcement of this Agreement. 9. Binding Arbitration Agreement. Except as otherwise set forth in Section 8 above, in the event of any dispute between Client and Summit, whether during the performance of the Services contemplated under this Agreement or after, Client and Summit agree to negotiate in good faith towards the resolution of the dispute. If Client and Summit are unable to resolve the dispute within twenty (20) days after the date the dispute arises, then Client and Summit agree to resolve the dispute through binding arbitration. All disputes arising out of or relating to this Agreement including, without limitation, claims relating to the formation, performance or interpretation of this Agreement, and claims of negligence, breach of contract and breach of warranty, which are not resolved either through direct negotiation as provided above, shall be resolved by binding arbitration under the Construction Industry Arbitration Rules of the American Arbitration Association then in effect. This arbitration agreement will be governed by the Federal Arbitration Act and the Minnesota Uniform Arbitration Act. Arbitration will be commenced by written demand for arbitration filed with the American Arbitration Association and the notice of filing, together with a copy of the written demand for arbitration, be provided to the other party in accordance with the notice provisions of this Agreement. However, no arbitration or legal action will be commenced following expiration of the application statute of limitations or repose. Judgment on the arbitration award will be confirmed in any court with jurisdiction. Client and Summit agree that any subcontractor, material supplier, or sub-subcontractor may be made a party to the arbitration proceeding. Venue for the arbitration will be in Ramsey County, Minnesota. Summit expressly reserves all mechanics lien rights under Chapter 514 of the Minnesota Statutes and may take such other legal action as is needed to perfect such rights. The provisions contained in this paragraph will survive the completion of the Services and termination of this Agreement. 10. Miscellaneous. The headings used herein are for convenience only and are not to be used in interpreting this Agreement. This Agreement shall be construed, enforced and interpreted under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Except as otherwise provided herein, jurisdiction and venue for the interpretation and enforcement of this Agreement shall be solely in the courts of the State of Minnesota located in Ramsey County, Minnesota. Each party waives the right to a jury trial. This Agreement may not be modified, amended or changed orally, but only by an agreement in writing signed by the parties hereto. Neither party shall be deemed to have waived any rights under this Agreement unless such waiver is given in writing and signed by such party. If any provision of this Agreement is invalid or unenforceable, such provision shall be deemed to be modified to be within the limits of enforceability or validity, if feasible; however, if the offending provision cannot be so modified, it shall be stricken and all other provisions of this Agreement in all other respects shall remain valid and enforceable. This Agreement is not assignable by Client. This Agreement is the entire agreement between the parties regarding the subject matter of this Agreement; any prior or simultaneous oral or written agreement regarding the subject matter hereof is superseded by this Agreement. Page 2 of 2 Proposal and Contract Date of Proposal: 02-17-2020 Proposal Submitted To: City of Centerville Regarding: Fire Sprinkler Deficiency Proposal Project Name: Public Works Building Address: 2085 West Cedar Street Centerville, MN 55038 SCOPE OF WORK Bid per annual inspection: Supply a spare sprinkler cabinet with spare sprinkler heads and wrenches. Existing cabinet is missing. Replace inspectors test valve. Existing valve is damaged and should be replaced. Proposed Price: $975.00 Page 2 of 4 Completion of the Project: Summit Fire Protection offers to provide to Owner the equipment, supplies and materials, as well as the design and installation services and labor to complete the Project, as described in the Specifications. This Proposal shallwithin 30 days. Upon delivery by Owner of acceptance of this Proposal, we reserve the right to adjust all prices based on the cost of materials at the time of contract, due to the volatility in the steel market. The customer may be required to pay for materials at the time of contract to guarantee price. General Conditions: The General Conditions attached to this Proposal are a part of this Proposal. Upon acceptance of this Proposal by Owner, the General Conditions will be a part of the contract between Summit and Owner. SUMMIT COMPANIES: By: Andrew Kovala Signature Andrew Kovala Print Name Service Sales Summit Companies akovala@summitcous.com Phone: (651) 251-1848 OWNER ACCEPTANCE OF PROPOSAL received and read the Proposal and the attached General Conditions. Upon acceptance by Owner, this Proposal, along with the attached General Conditions, will be a binding contract between Summit Fire Protection and Owner. OWNER: By: Signature Print Name Date Page 3 of 4 SUMMIT COMPANIES PROPOSAL AND CONTRACT GENERAL CONDITIONS These General Conditions are attached to and made a part of the Summit Proposal and Contract to which they are attached (collectively, the 1.Payment. Owner agrees to pay the Contract Price for the Project as and when required in the Contract. If Owner fails to pay the Contract Price, or any installment thereof, within ten (10) days after the date the same is due and payable, Owner shall automatically be assessed and shall pay a late charge equivalent to three percent (3%) of the amount of such late payment, together with interest on such late payment at the lower of the maximum rate allowed by applicable law or the rate of eighteen percent (18%) per annum. 2.Changes. Except for substitutions, as described below in this paragraph, any alteration or modification to the Project must be documented and approved by Summit and Owner by a written change order signed by Summit and Owner. Summit reserves the right to require Owner to pay for all change order items (labor, equipment and any other materials) at the time of signing the change order. In the event of discontinuations, changes or the unavailability of specific equipment or materials described in the Specifications, Summit will have the right to substitute equipment and materials with substantially similar quality and features; provided, however, that if the replacement items are more expensive, then Summit shall notify Owner and Owner may elect whether to pay the additional expense (as an increase to the Contract Price) or to modify the Proposal to include less expensive items, if available, that would not increase the Contract Price. 3.Limited Warranty. All materials and labor supplied by Summit will be warranted for one (1) year from the date of completion of the Project. Upon request, Summit will supply a signed warranty letter to Owner, which states the completion date of the Project and the warranty warranty on such equipment. enforcement of requested by Owner of Summit in connection with d fees and charges at the time. No other express or implied warranties are made b abuse or any use that is not in conformity with all applicable specifications and instructions. Except as specifically set forth in this Contract, Summit, and/or its agents and representatives makes no warranty or representation, express or implied, with respect to use, construction standards, workmanship, materials, merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose. 4.Taxes. Any taxes or other governmental charges related to the Project shall be paid by Owner to Summit and shall be in addition to the Contract Price. In addition, if any fees or permits (such as one or more building permits) are required in connection with the Project, Owner shall secure and pay for any such fees and permits, the cost of which shall be in addition to the Contract Price 5.Unavoidable Delays. To the extent any time period for performance by Summit applies, Summit shall not be responsible for any delays due to federal, state or municipal actions or regulations, strikes or other labor shortages, equipment or other materials delays or shortages, acts or omissions of Owner, or any other events or causes beyond the control of Summit. 6.Access. Owner shall allow Summit to have reasonable access to the job site to allow the completion of the Project on the dates and at the times requested by Summit personnel. 7.Risk of Loss. Risk of loss shall pass to Owner at the time the equipment and other materials that are part of the Project are delivered to the job site. This means that, for example, in the event of damage or destruction due to casualty, or in the event of theft, Owner shall be responsible for payment for such equipment and materials even if the Project has not been completed. Title to the equipment and other materials shall be held by Summit until payment in full of the Contract Price, at which time title shall pass to Owner. Summit shall have the right to remove the equipment and other materials that are a part of the Project if payment of the full Contract Price is not made by Owner immediately upon completion of the Project. That right shall be in addition to, and not in limitation of, Summit other rights and remedies. 8.MECHANIC LIEN NOTICE. YOU ARE ENTITLED UNDER MINNESOTA LAW TO THE FOLLOWING NOTICE: (a) ANY PERSON OR COMPANY SUPPLYING LABOR OR MATERIALS FOR THIS IMPROVEMENT TO YOUR PROPERTY MAY FILE A LIEN AGAINST YOUR PROPERTY IF THAT PERSON OR COMPANY IS NOT PAID FOR THEIR CONTRIBUTIONS. (b)UNDER MINNESOTA LAW, YOU HAVE THE RIGHT TO PAY PERSONS WHO SUPPLIED LABOR OR MATERIALS FOR THIS IMPROVEMENT DIRECTLY AND DEDUCT THIS AMOUNT FROM OUR CONTRACT PRICE, OR WITHHOLD THE AMOUNTS DUE THEM FROM US UNTIL 120 DAYS AFTER COMPLETION OF THE IMPROVEMENT UNLESS WE GIVE YOU A LIEN WAIVER SIGNED BY PERSONS WHO SUPPLIED ANY 9.Limitation of Liability and Remedies. The Project is not an insurance policy or a substitute for an insurance policy. In the event of any breach, default or negligence by Summit under this Contract, Owner agrees that the maximum liability of Summit shall not exceed an amount equal to the Contract Price. Owner expressly waives any right to make any claim in excess of that amount. Further, Owner waives any right to any claims for punitive, exemplary or consequential damages. Owner shall provide Summit with reasonable notice of any claim and a reasonable opportunity to cure the alleged breach or default. Owner shall indemnify, defend and hold Summit harmless from and against claims, actions, costs and expenses, including reasonable legal fees and costs, arising out of any injury, death or damage occurring on or about the job site unless caused by the gross negligence or willful misconduct of Summit. Page 4 of 4 10. . If Owner fails to pay any amount due to Summit as and when required, Summit shall have the right, but not the obligation, to immediately stop work on the Project and Summit may pursue any and all available remedies, including the right to place a lien against the Project site. In addition, Owner shall be obligated to reimburse Summit for reasonable legal fees and costs incurred by Summit in the enforcement of this Contract. 11. Binding Arbitration Agreement. Except as otherwise set forth in Section 10 above, in the event of any dispute between Owner and Summit, whether during the performance of the work and services contemplated under this Contract or after, Owner and Summit agree to negotiate in good faith towards the resolution of the dispute. If Owner and Summit are unable to resolve the dispute within twenty (20) days after the date the dispute arises, then Owner and Summit agree to resolve the dispute through binding arbitration. All disputes arising out of or relating to this Contract including, without limitation, claims relating to the formation, performance or interpretation of this Contract, and claims of negligence, breach of contract and breach of warranty, which are not resolved either through direct negotiation as provided above, shall be resolved by binding arbitration under the Construction Industry Arbitration Rules of the American Arbitration Association then in effect. This arbitration agreement will be governed by the Federal Arbitration Act and the Minnesota Uniform Arbitration Act. Arbitration will be commenced by written demand for arbitration filed with the American Arbitration Association and the notice of filing, together with a copy of the written demand for arbitration, be provided to the other party in accordance with the notice provisions of this Contract. However, no arbitration or legal action will be commenced following expiration of the application statute of limitations or repose. Judgment on the arbitration award will be confirmed in any court with jurisdiction. Owner and Summit agree that any subcontractor, material supplier, or sub-subcontractor may be made a party to the arbitration proceeding. Venue for the arbitration will be Ramsey County, Minnesota. Summit expressly reserves all mechanics lien rights under Chapter 514 of the Minnesota Statutes and may take such other legal action as is needed to perfect such rights. The provisions contained in this paragraph will survive the completion of construction and termination of this Contract. 12. Miscellaneous. The headings used herein are for convenience only and are not to be used in interpreting this Contract. This Contract shall be construed, enforced and interpreted under the laws of the State of Minnesota. This Contract may not be modified, amended or changed orally, but only by an agreement in writing signed by the parties hereto. Neither party shall be deemed to have waived any rights under this Contract unless such waiver is given in writing and signed by such party. If any provision of this Contract is invalid or unenforceable, such provision shall be deemed to be modified to be within the limits of enforceability or validity, if feasible; however, if the offending provision cannot be so modified, it shall be stricken and all other provisions of this Contract in all other respects shall remain valid and enforceable. This Contract is not assignable by Owner. This Contract is the entire agreement between the parties regarding the subject matter of this Contract; any prior or simultaneous oral or written agreement regarding the subject matter hereof is superseded by this Contract. CITY OF CENTERVILLE REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION Agenda Item # Department: Requested Council Meeting Date: February 26, 2020 Engineering/Public Works VIII.1.a TITLE OF ISSUE: Resolution 20-0XX Adopting Assessment Roll - Downtown Street and Utility Improvements BACKGROUND AND SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION: After taking public input at the Assessment Hearing, the Council may decide to either cancel the assessments, continue the hearing to another date, or adopt the assessments. If the Council decides to adopt the assessments, the attached resolution should be considered. COST AND SOURCE(S) OF FUNDING: $285,039 in Assessment Revenue as presented; revenue would be credited to the Street Capital Fund REQUESTED COUNCIL ACTION: Motion to Adopt Resolution 20-0XX Adopting Assessments for the 2020 Downtown Street and Utility Improvements Project. SUPPORTED DOCUMENTS ATTACHED Motion By: ____________________________________ Resolution Ordinance Contract Minutes Plan Map Second By: ____________________________________ Vote Record: Aye Nay _____ _____ Other (specify) ____________ _____ _____ Love _____ _____ Paar _______________________________________________________________ _____ _____ Koski _____ _____ Montain _______________________________________________________________ Administration Department Use: Refer to: _________________________________ Consent Tabled Until: ______________________________ Regular Other: ___________________________________ D A O R E R P I U D R D 733 Marquette Avenue, Suite 1000Minneapolis, MN 55402www.stantec.com RE TA DWRA AORELC 4 1 17491748 1744 FIGURE6 NONE EK . H . A 1745 . 1744 S . C 70727048 Y S DASERGO ORRP R 70867082 7096 A T N E 70591721 M E 70877085 1724 NONE L E L E O L NONE O L I H V C T R S E E E T 707217247046171617241740 R N T E D AOR S ELLIVRE TNEC C 70567064 NONENONENONE 1695 NONE T PROJ. NO. 7121 N E I E A 1691 R M T T 168716957082 E S E R E T G S 8/5/2019193804758 T A E T E I W DATE R E R I T E V S 7060 N 1680 OFFIOG H DAOR T S E W L 704570597067 E 7087 R O S 15881580 16431649 75150 ASPHALT ROADWAY CONCRETE WALK LEGEND PROPOSED ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS CITY OF CENTERVILLE, MN2020 DOWNTOWN STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT Plot Date: 08/05/2019 - 3:45pm Drawing name: C:\\Users\\jopond\\appdata\\local\\temp\\AcPublish_3404\\193804758_Feasibility Figures.dwg Xrefs:, 616map_nad83, 193804758_XSPL, 193804758_XSNO, 193804758_XSWT, 193804758_C100, 193804758_XSST, 193804758_XSXT, 193804758_XSSW City of Centerville Res. #20-0___ RESOLUTION ADOPTING ASSESSMENTS FOR THE INSTALLATION OF MUNICIPAL STREETS, CURB AND GUTTER IMPROVEMENTS WHEREAS, pursuant to proper notice duly given as required by law, the council has met and heard and passed upon all objections to the proposed assessment for installation of streets, curb and gutter, and sidewalk improvement in the following areas: Centerville Road north of Main Street, Sorel Street west to its beginning/end and east to it beginning/end, Progress Road from Main Street to Heritage Street, Goiffon Road from Sorel Street to Heritage Street and Heritage Street east from Centerville Road to its beginning/end NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF CENTERVILLE, MINNESOTA: 1.Such proposed assessment, a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part hereof, is hereby accepted and shall constitute the special assessment against the lands named therein, and each tract of land therein included is hereby found to be benefited by the proposed improvement in the amount of the assessment levied against it. 2.Such assessment shall be payable in equal annual installments extending over a period of 15 years, the first of the installments to be payable on or before the first Monday in January, and shall bear interest at the rate of 3.5% percent per annum from the date of the adoption of this assessment resolution. To the first installment shall be added interest on the entire assessment from the date of this resolution until December 31, 2020. To each subsequent installment, when due, shall be added interest for one year on all unpaid installments. 3.The owner of any property so assessed may, at any time prior to certification of the assessment to the county auditor, pay the whole of the assessment on such property, with interest accrued to the date of payment, to the city treasurer, except that no interest shall be charged if the entire assessment is paid within 30 days from the adoption of this resolution; and he/she may, at any time thereafter, pay to the city treasurer the entire amount of the assessment remaining unpaid, with interest accrued to December 31 of the year in which such payment is made. Such payment must be made before November 15 or interest will be charged through December 31 of the next succeeding year. 4.The clerk shall forthwith transmit a certified duplicate of this assessment to the county auditor to be extended on the property tax lists of the county. Such assessments shall be collected and paid over in the same manner as other municipal taxes. Adopted by the council this 26th day of February, 2020. Mayor, Jeff Paar Attest: City Clerk, Teresa Bender 204.00 Total $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ Assessment Zip 16247,650.00 OwnerCode OwnerState City LAKESMN550383,825.00LAKESMN5503814,662.50 PAULMN551013,187.50 PAULMN551085,100.00 CENTERVILLEMN5501415,937.50CENTERVILLEMN55014CENTERVILLEMN55014CENTERVILLEMN55014CENTERVILLEMN550149,562.50HUGOMN550386,630.00 Improvements RDCENTERVILLEMN550383,825.00RDCENTERVILLEMN550383,825.00 #200ST. TTTTTNSTT LNCENTERVILLEMN550389,562.50STHUGOMN550385,100.00STCENTERVILLEMN550386,375.00STCENTERVILLEMN550385,100.00STCENTERVILLEMN550385,100.00 SSSSSRDCENTERVILLEMN550385,100.00S DRLINODRLINO NEMINNEAPOLISMN554139,562.50 ST Roll STCENTERVILLEMN550386,375.00STCENTERVILLEMN550386,630.00STHUGOMN550383,825.00STCENTERVILLEMN550383,825.00STCENTERVILLEMN550386,375.00STCENTERVILLEMN550383,825.00 STCENTERVILLEMN550382,550.00STCENTERVILLEMN5503812,750.00STCENTERVILLEMN550386,375.00STCENTERVILLEMN550386,375.00STCENTERVILLEMN55038 Utiilty SUITE AVE STREETHUDSONWI54016 E AddressOwner ST MEADOWLACASSEMAINMAINSORELMAINMAINMAINGOIFFONGOIFFONGOIFFONGOIFFONGOIFFONLACASSECENTERVILLECENTERVILLESORELSORELSORELGOIFFONALBERTGOIFFONSORELSORELHERITAGEHERITAGEHERITAGEHERITAGE 13THVINE 4TH and 208 TRUSTE Street Assessment SORG DONALD508 A7045 & LLC6625LLC6625 R7121 M1716 TRUSTEE PENELOPE BARBARA &JR1748 OF1880OF1880OF1694OF1880OF1880 J O R7121 L7067 L1740 PROPERTIESPROPERTIES ANN1680 t RIVARD GENEVIEVE7087GENEVIEVE7087GENEVIEVE7087GENEVIEVE7087GENEVIEVE7087 A1687 PATRICIA P1695 CITYCITYCITYCITYCITY & STSTSTSTST JONATHAN PAUL8 TRUSTEEMATTHEW1457 JON1580 RALPH GENE MARIE1588 LAKESLAKES Vacan OFOFOFOFOF DAVID JULIE DENNIS1744 Downtown DONALD1743CENTERVILLE1880ST. = PAUL DAVID RICHARD BARON PATRICIA REBECCA V OFOF & 2020 RDSUMMITRDCENTERVILLERDCAMP RDRIVARD STBUSSESTNELSONSTHEMANNSTFERWERDA Institutional RDBURKERDWANLESSRDJACOBSONRDKAPAUN = I STCENTERVILLESTCITYSTBOHLSTKILIANSTLINDSAYSTNESHEIMSTBRICKNER STFLEETHAMSTCENTERVILLE MAINPROGRESSCENTERVILLEMAINCENTERVILLESORELSORELCENTERVILLESORELGOIFFONSORELSORELGOIFFONGOIFFONGOIFFONSORELSORELHERITAGEHERITAGEHERITAGEHERITAGE COMMERCIALVACANTRESIDENTIAL Residential, = R 00271724002670870041708200041695000870730009CENTERVILLE00101694001116880067CENTERVILLE0024CHURCH0025CITY0027CHURCH0028CHURCH0030CHURCH0032CHURCH0040SUMMIT001571210016CAMP00121680001370600015169500161 687003470450035705900367067006315880064158000041748000517440006174000091716 IDADDRESSOwnerOwner 24242422232323232323232323232324222223232323232323232324242424 22222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222 Commercial, 31313131313131313131313131313131313131313131313131313131313131 = CPROPERTY 23232323232323232323232323232323232323232323232323 232323232323 20%18% Total 34,629.00 319,668.00285,039.00319,668.00285,039.00 1,585,939.501,585,939.50 $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ $ Assessment Zip OwnerCode OwnerState City PINESMN550146,375.00PINESMN5501412,750.00PINESMN5501412,750.00 CENTERVILLEMN55014CENTERVILLEMN5501423,460.00 Improvements RDCENTERVILLEMN550387,650.00RDCENTERVILLEMN550381,530.00RDHUGOMN550381,530.00 RDHUGOMN550389,690.00RDHUGOMN550389,180.00RDCENTERVILLEMN550384,080.00RDCENTERVILLEMN550385,100.00RDCENTERVILLEMN550387,650.00RDCENTERVILLEMN550383,825.00RDCENTERVILLEMN550381,275.00RDCENTERVILLEMN55 0387,599.00 TT STCENTERVILLEMN550385,100.00STHUGOMN550383,825.00STCENTERVILLEMN550384,080.00STCENTERVILLEMN550383,825.00STCENTERVILLEMN550381,275.00 SS RDCIRCLERDCIRCLERDCIRCLE Roll STHUGOMN550387,905.00 Utiilty AddressOwner CENTERVILLEPROGRESSHERITAGEHERITAGEPROGRESSPROGRESSHERITAGEPROGRESSSORELCENTERVILLECENTERVILLEHERITAGEHERITAGEPROGRESSPROGRESSPROGRESSPROGRESSGOIFFONGOIFFONNORTHNORTHNORTH 7931 and 792 651 contact: 3232 Statz Street A7072 #124707 Assessment BRITTNEY7046 A1745 429 please Mark J1749 J7086 651 K1724 C RIVARD DISTRICT #124707 & MARGARET MICHELLE & & RHONDA R7096 Bender DONNA J7048 A assessments & #124707 M REHBEIN & L t GENEVIEVE7087GENEVIEVE7087 SCHOOL & on JEANNE7059 D ISD DISTRICT R STST PAUL NICHOLAS7072 Teresa GARY MATTHEW M THOMAS Vacan OFOF Downtown THOMASJOHN7056 JREDWARD1721 CURTIS KATERINA1724KATERINA1724 ALEXANDRA7085 = PAO7082PAO7082 STEVEN V ClerkAdministrator/Engineer SCHOOL questions & For CityCity 2020 RDRIVARDRDGALLAWAYRDBELDEN RDNEISIUSRDANDERSONRDXIONGRDNEKOWITSCHRDPIERSIAKRDHILLMANRDXIONGRDKAISER STMCKAYSTMORAVECSTSZULIMSTTRIGAS Institutional RDCHURCHRDCHURCH = I STKING CENTERVILLEPROGRESSHERITAGEHERITAGEPROGRESSPROGRESSHERITAGEPROGRESSSORELCENTERVILLECENTERVILLEHERITAGEPROGRESSPROGRESSPROGRESSPROGRESSGOIFFONGOIFFON INSTITUTIONAL Residential, = R 0010704600127048001317490014174500167072002270820031172100327059003317240034707200367056003817240039TRIGAS0043709600447086004570820136708500267087006870870023IND0024CENTENNIAL0025INDEPENDENT IDADDRESSOwnerOwner 24242424242424242424242424242424242323212121 22222222222222222222222222222222222222222222 Commercial, 31313131313131313131313131313131313131313131 = CPROPERTY 2323232323232323232323232323232323232323 2323 CITY OF CENTERVILLE REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION Agenda Item # Department: Requested Council Meeting Date: February 26, 2020 Engineering/Public Works VIII.1.b TITLE OF ISSUE: Resolution 20-0XX Awarding Contract - Downtown Street and Utility Improvements Project BACKGROUND AND SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION: If the council is ready to move forward with the project, the next step would be to award the construction contract to the lowest responsible and responsive bidder; A-1 Excavating, Inc. COST AND SOURCE(S) OF FUNDING: $1,982,594.00; Street Capital Fund REQUESTED COUNCIL ACTION: Motion to Adopt Resolution 20-0XX Awarding the Construction Contract to A-1 Excavating, Inc. SUPPORTED DOCUMENTS ATTACHED Motion By: ____________________________________ Resolution Ordinance Contract Minutes Plan Map Second By: ____________________________________ X Vote Record: Aye Nay _____ _____ Bid Tab and Award Recommendation Letter Other (specify) ____________ _____ _____ Love _____ _____ Paar _______________________________________________________________ _____ _____ Koski _____ _____ Montain _______________________________________________________________ Administration Department Use: Refer to: _________________________________ Consent Tabled Until: ______________________________ Regular Other: ___________________________________ City of Centerville Res. #20-0___ RESOLUTION ACCEPTING BID WHEREAS, pursuant to an advertisement for bids was published, according to law, for the Downtown Street and Utility Improvements Project, which consists of street and utility reconstruction for: Centerville Road north of Main Street, Sorel Street west to its beginning/end and east to it beginning/end, Progress Road from Main Street to Heritage Street, Goiffon Road from Sorel Street to Heritage Street and Heritage Street east from Centerville Road to its beginning/end. Bids were received, publicly opened, and tabulated according to the law, and the following bids were received complying with the advertisement: Contractor Total Base Bid Low A-1 Excavating Inc $1,982,594.00 #2 Northdale Construction Co Inc $2,414,919.83 #3 Kuechle Underground Inc $2,456,182.00 #4 C&L Excavating, Inc $2,543,508.00 #5 Meyer Contracting, Inc $2,918,315.42 AND WHEREAS, it appears that A-1 Excavating, Inc., of Bloomer, WI is the lowest responsible bidder, NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF CENTERVILLE, MINNESOTA: 1. The mayor and clerk are hereby authorized and directed to enter into the attached contract with A-1 Contracting, Inc., of Bloomer, WI, in the name of the city of Centerville for the improvement of Centerville Road north of Main Street, Sorel Street west to its beginning/end and east to it beginning/end, Progress Road from Main Street to Heritage Street, Goiffon Road from Sorel Street to Heritage Street and Heritage Street east from Centerville Road to its beginning/end according to the plans and specifications therefor approved by the city council and on file in the office of the city clerk. 2. The city clerk is hereby authorized and directed to return forthwith to all bidders the deposits made with their bids, except that the deposits of the successful bidder and the next lowest bidder shall be retained until a contract has been signed. Adopted by the city council this 26 day of February, 2020 . Mayor, Jeff Paar Attest: ___________ City Clerk, Teresa Bender END OF FORM Special Assessment Toolkit Based on M.S. 429.041, subd. 2 12/3/2019 CITY OF CENTERVILLE REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION Agenda Item # Department: Requested Council Meeting Date: February 26, 2020 Engineering/Public Works IX.3 TITLE OF ISSUE: LaMotte Park Stormwater Irrigation System Expansion BACKGROUND AND SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION: Previously, the city council approved the preparation of plans and specifications for the expansion of the LaMotte Park Stormwater Irrigation System Expansion Project. Those plans are now complete and we are ready to put the project out to bid. COST AND SOURCE(S) OF FUNDING: TBD REQUESTED COUNCIL ACTION: Motion to approve the plans and specifications and authorize the advertisement for bids for the 2020 LaMotte Park Stormwater Irrigation System Expansion Project. SUPPORTED DOCUMENTS ATTACHED Motion By: ____________________________________ Resolution Ordinance Contract Minutes Plan Map Second By: ____________________________________ Vote Record: Aye Nay _____ _____ Plans Other (specify) ____________ _____ _____ Love _____ _____ Paar _______________________________________________________________ _____ _____ Koski _____ _____ Montain _______________________________________________________________ Administration Department Use: Refer to: _________________________________ Consent Tabled Until: ______________________________ Regular Other: ___________________________________ Stantec Consulting Services Inc. 733 Marquette Avenue Suite 1000, Minneapolis MN 55402-2309 February 20, 2020 File: 193804960 Attention: Mr. Mark Statz, City Administrator/Engineer City of Centerville 1880 Main Street Centerville, MN 55038 Dear Mark, Reference: Approval of Plans/Authorization of Bidding for 2020 LaMotte Park Irrigation Expansion As requested, we have prepared plans and specifications for the 2020 LaMotte Park Irrigation Expansion project. The project generally consists of expanding the existing irrigation system that was installed in Laurie LaMotte Park in 2011. The proposed expansion would consist of adding three additional “gun-style” heads within LaMotte Park, a traditional irrigation system to irrigate the inner portion of the park around the infields, a traditional irrigation system to irrigate Hidden Spring Park, as well as alternates to provide irrigation to the St. Paul Regional Water Service property just north of Hidden Spring Park, and the southwesterly portion of the St. Genevieve’s Church property just north of LaMotte Park. The proposed irrigation improvements will be used to obtain stormwater mitigation credits from the Rice Creek Watershed District (RCWD) for the planned 2020 Downtown Area Street and Utility project, as well as for future redevelopment within the Downtown area. The City has received a grant from the Metropolitan Council for $100,000 to fund the majority of the project costs. This grant requires a minimum of $33,000 in matching funds from the City of Centerville. The total project costs for these improvements, including indirect costs, is currently estimated at $165,000. The breakdown of estimated project costs is shown in the table below. Improvement TypeFunding SourceEstimated Cost Base Bid (LaMotte Park, Hidden Spring Park irrigation)Grant/Storm Sewer Fund $98,000 Base Bid (Light for sliding hill)City Funds$7,000 Alternate 1: SPRWS PropertyGrant/Storm Sewer Fund $25,000 Alternate 2: St. Genevieve’s ChurchGrant/Storm Sewer Fund $35,000 Estimated Total Project Cost$165,000 February 20, 2020 Mr. Mark Statz, City Administrator/Engineer Page 2 of 2 Reference:Approval of Plans/Authorization of Bidding for 2020 LaMotte Park Irrigation Expansion If the Council chooses to move forward with this project, we recommend that the City Council approve the plans and authorize advertisement for bids at the February 26 Council meeting. This would allow bids to be opened on March 18, with consideration of contract award on March 25. All work under this contract would be completed in 2020. If you have any questions or would like additional information, please call me at 612-712-2125. Regards, Stantec Consulting Services Inc. Kellie Schlegel Associate Phone: 612-712-2125 kellie.schlegel@stantec.com Attachment:2020 LaMotte Irrigation Expansion plan set c.Lee Mann, Dan Edgerton, Jacob Burgstahler, Chuck Oehrlein - Stantec Memo To:Mark Statz From: Dan Edgerton City of Centerville Stantec – Minneapolis File: 193804960 Date:February 19, 2020 Reference: City of Centerville – LaMotte Park Stormwater Reuse Expansion Future downtown redevelopment within the City, including the 2020 Downtown Area Street and Utility Improvements (SUIP), will need to meet Rice Creek Watershed District (RCWD) Rule C requirements for water quality treatment. This memo discussed how the LaMotte Park stormwater reuse (irrigation area) expansion can help meet RCWD requirements in 2020 and moving forward. LaMotte Park Irrigation System Expansion The existing irrigation system has 7 “gun-style” irrigation heads (190’ water distribution radius) and covers approximately 11.1 acres of pervious irrigated area, as shown in attached Figure 1 – Existing and Proposed Irrigated Areas. Proposed system improvements include a base design and two alternatives, detailed in the table below. The base design and each alternative are shown on Figure 1. Alternative Irrigated AreasArea Increase (ac) Base Lamotte Park: 3 additional “gun-style” heads, infield irrigation (conventional), and3.62 Hidden Springs Park irrigation (conventional) Alternative 1 Base + SPRWS Lot irrigation (conventional) 4.08 Alternative 2 Base + Alternative 1 + MCES & Church Lots irrigation (conventional) 8.32 Potential RCWD Rule C Credits Met Council Water Reuse Spreadsheets (updated per RCWD Rules) have been completed to display existing and proposed conditions for each alternative. The “Increase in Impervious Area Treated” shows the amount of additional impervious area (over existing conditions) that could be credited (Rule C) with the increase in irrigated area. Water Reuse Spreadsheet results are shown in the table below, and individual alternative results are attached. Existing Base Alternative 1 Alternative 2 Impervious Area Draining to Supply (ac) 38.238.238.2 38.2 Irrigation Storage \[pond\] Volume (af) 0.919 0.919 0.919 0.919 Pervious Area to be Irrigated (ac)11.014.62 15.08 19.32 Impervious Area Treated (ac) 7.218.708.86 10.10 Increase in Impervious Area Treated (ac) NA 1.491.65 2.89 2020 SUIP and Beyond Pending upcoming discussions with RCWD staff, the increased irrigation areas should allow water reuse credits to be applied to upcoming downtown redevelopment projects, including the 2020 SUIP. The 2020 SUIP has 17,200 sf (0.4 ac) of new impervious area, which could be accounted for with the 1.49 ac of credits provided under the base design. Thus, the base design would cover the 2020 SUIP while leaving 1.09 ac of credit for future downtown redevelopment. ed \\\\us0291-ppfss01\\workgroup\\1938\\active\\193804960\\design\\stormwater\\rcwd_permit\\centerville_rcwd_waterreuse_finalmemo_02192020.docx February 19, 2020 Mark Statz Page 2 of 2 Reference: City of Centerville – LaMotte Park Stormwater Reuse Expansion Stantec Consulting Services Inc Dan Edgerton Senior Associate Phone: 612 712-2037 dan.edgerton@stantec.com Attachment: Figure 1 – Existing and Proposed Irrigated Areas RCWD Water Reuse Worksheets (multiple alternatives) c. Kellie Schlegel, Stantec Rob Monk, Stantec ed \\\\us0291-ppfss01\\workgroup\\1938\\active\\193804960\\design\\stormwater\\rcwd_permit\\centerville_rcwd_waterreuse_finalmemo_02192020.docx 400 N 200 ADDITIONALAREAS TO BEALTERNATE NO. 1ALTERNATE NO. 2 IRRIGATED AREA(11.1 AC)IRRIGATED:(3.6 AC)(0.5 AC(4.2 AC) EXISTINGBASE BID 733 Marquette Avenue, Suite 1000Minneapolis, MN 55402www.stantec.com 0 4 5 6 1 2 1 T E 1 1 7 6 7 L 5 T 3 C R E 48 I 59 S 1 C R FIGURE1 2 N A 8 4 E W W EL CRICELLIVR UOT B 3 4 O O 1 D D D 1 Y A R A E 9 3 E E A M 2 2 M 3 C 1 4 G 1 N 0 1 2 3 U 4 1 12 1 A 11 H 1 l 12.O N.H.A. llll S.C C FM M E l E l F FM FM l B-G B-G CLVT CLVTCLVTCLVT E S D AOR ELLIVRETN l EC M M F F H l C R 0 U 0 . 0 9 1 R H R C C M M F l S F ' l E l l V 193804960 l E I V 6 E ll 3 N M l M F E F 5 L PROJ. NO. G 1 E . C T S l R l l 2 # A D L L LE I A BF - T F P O BLDG.M S / M E S F A B 1 F # D LL LE I A BF - T F O S / E S l A E B l l K 3 T # SS 02/19/2020 D LL LE R AI BF SS-T T F O A S / E l S O A B P E M V DATE L I l A R A DL I l l M ll F R E 1 I O M R F l M A U 6 E 2 3 A E l LM L T ll l E T C O 3 R M l A A 1 ll L P l 4 M F SS l l l l 5 l 6 SSSS U G N I K l R C H A S C l SSPT I D W Y T R GN LS N U I P O D L S I l U B l WELL l l 6 1 N G K E N I ll R ll l ll l R P D S K A N R G D E A D P I P D N I H I H R P S EXISTING AND PROPOSED IRRIGATED AREAS CITY OF CENTERVILLE, MNLAMOTTE IRRIGATION EXPANSION PlotDate:02/19/2020-2:19pm Drawingname:V:\\1938\\active\\193804960\\CAD\\Dwg\\193804960_FIG1.dwg Xrefs:,193804960_XSXT,193804960_XSPL,193804960_XSNO RCWD Reuse Design Worksheet www.ricecreek.org 763-398-3070 Project Name Centerville - Downtown Redevelopment Permit Number EXISTING Date 2/19/2020 Project Type Standard Site Data Enter impervious area requiring treatment and select units AreaUnits 7.1acres Irrigation Design Data Enter impervious area draining to storage and select units AreaUnits 38.2acres Enter pervious area to be irrigated and select units AreaUnits 11.0acres Irrigation rate (inches per week, not to exceed 0.5-inches) 0.5 Start date of End date of irrigation irrigation season season April 15October 15 Enter volume of irrigation storage and select units VolumeUnits 0.9acre-feet Results Average annual stormwater irrigation volume (CF)529,159 Event based credit (CF)28,561 Impervious area treated 7.15 acres Does the irrigation system meet water quality treatment requirementYes RCWD Reuse Design Worksheet www.ricecreek.org 763-398-3070 Project Name Centerville - Downtown Redevelopment Permit Number PROPOSED BASE Date 2/19/2020 Project Type Standard Site Data Enter impervious area requiring treatment and select units AreaUnits 8.7acres Irrigation Design Data Enter impervious area draining to storage and select units AreaUnits 38.2acres Enter pervious area to be irrigated and select units AreaUnits 14.6acres Irrigation rate (inches per week, not to exceed 0.5-inches) 0.5 Start date of End date of irrigation irrigation season season April 15October 15 Enter volume of irrigation storage and select units VolumeUnits 0.9acre-feet Results Average annual stormwater irrigation volume (CF)643,344 Event based credit (CF)34,724 Impervious area treated 8.70 acres Does the irrigation system meet water quality treatment requirementYes RCWD Reuse Design Worksheet www.ricecreek.org 763-398-3070 Centerville - Downtown Redevelopment Permit Number Project Name PROPOSED BASE + ALT 1 Date 2/19/2020 Project Type Standard Site Data Enter impervious area requiring treatment and select units AreaUnits 8.8acres Irrigation Design Data Enter impervious area draining to storage and select units AreaUnits 38.2acres Enter pervious area to be irrigated and select units AreaUnits 15.1acres Irrigation rate (inches per week, not to exceed 0.5-inches) 0.5 Start date of End date of irrigation irrigation season season April 15October 15 Enter volume of irrigation storage and select units VolumeUnits 0.9acre-feet Results Average annual stormwater irrigation volume (CF)655,529 Event based credit (CF)35,382 Impervious area treated 8.86 acres Does the irrigation system meet water quality treatment requirementYes RCWD Reuse Design Worksheet www.ricecreek.org 763-398-3070 Project Name Centerville - Downtown Redevelopment Permit Number PROPOSED BASE + ALT 1 + ALT 2 Date 2/19/2020 Project Type Standard Site Data Enter impervious area requiring treatment and select units AreaUnits 8.7acres Irrigation Design Data Enter impervious area draining to storage and select units AreaUnits 38.2acres Enter pervious area to be irrigated and select units AreaUnits 19.3acres Irrigation rate (inches per week, not to exceed 0.5-inches) 0.5 Start date of End date of irrigation irrigation season season April 15October 15 Enter volume of irrigation storage and select units VolumeUnits 0.9acre-feet Results Average annual stormwater irrigation volume (CF)747,230 Event based credit (CF)40,331 Impervious area treated 10.10 acres Does the irrigation system meet water quality treatment requirementYes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±-!291±-!BOE!:1±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±-!351±-!381±*/!UIF!DPOUSBDUPS!TIBMM!VTF!WBSJBCMF!BSD!OP\[\[MFT!XIFO!JOTUBMMJOHCZ!JOUFSGFSJOH!XJUI!UIF!TQSBZ!QBUUFSO!PG!UIF!JSSJHBUJPO!IFBE/!BMM!B EKVTUNFOUT!TIBMM!CF!NBEFCPUUPN!PG!TMPQF/!UP!UIF!FYUFOU!QPTTJCMF-!BWPJE!MPDBUJOH!IFBET!BU!CPUUPN!PG!TMPQF/!DJSDVJUIFBET!BU!TBNF!FMFWBUJPO!UPHFUIFS/QFSQFOEJDVMBS!UP!UIF!BEKBDFOU!GJOJTI!HSBEF!VOMFTT!JOT USVDUFE!PUIFSXJTF/ 5/BMM!QPQ.VQ!TUZMF!JSSJHBUJPO!IFBET!MPDBUFE!JO!JO!TISVC!PS!HSPVOEDPWFS!BSFBT!TIBMM!CF TQSBZ!IFBE!OPUFT;3/MPDBUF!BMM!IFBET!1(.7#!GSPN!CBDL!PG!XBML-!DVSC-!FUD/!BOE!BEKVTU!OP\[\[MFT!UP!XBUFS!FOUJSF4/QSPWJEF!7#!PS!23#!IJHI!QPQ!VQ!IFBET!BT!SFRVJSFE!GPS!XBUFS!)TUSFBN*!UP!DMFBS!JNNFEJBUFMZ6/ BMM!QPQ.VQ!TUZMF!JSSJHBUJPO!IFBET!UP!CF!MPDBUFE!JO!UVSG!BSFBT!TIBMM!CF!JOTUBMMFE!TP!UIF!UPQ7/JSSJHBUJPO!DPOUSBDUPS!TIBMM!SFEVDF!UIF!#UISPX#!PS!SBEJVT!PG!TQSBZ!OP\[\[MFT!XIFSFWFS!TQSBZ8/XIFO!JOTUBMMJO H!TQSBZ!TFSJFT!OP\[\[MFT!UIBU!SFRVJSF!BSD!QBUUFSOT!PUIFS!UIBO!UIF!TUBOEBSE9/UIF!JSSJHBUJPO!DPOUSBDUPS!TIBMM!CF!SFTQPOTJCMF!GPS!NBLJOH!GJFME!BEKVTUNFOUT!UP!UIF:/MPDBUF!SPXT!PG!IFBET!BU!UPQ!BOE!NJE!TMP QF!UP!NJOJNJ\[F!BOE!0!PS!FMJNJOBUF!TUBOEJOH!XBUFS!BU 2/GVMM!)IFBE.UP.IFBE*!DPWFSBHF!JT!SFRVJSFE!XJUIJO!UIF!BSFBT!EFMJOFBUFE!UP!SFDFJWF!JSSJHBUJPO/21/ESBJOBHF!PG!JSSJHBUJPO!XBUFS!UISPVHI!TQSBZ!IFBE!XJMM!OPU!CF!BMMPXFE/!JOTUBMM!DIFDL!WBMWFT22/UIF!JSSJHBU JPO!DPOUSBDUPS!TIBMM!CF!SFTQPOTJCMF!GPS!TFUUJOH!BMM!TQSBZ!IFBET!UP!CF EJGGFSFODFT!JO!HSBEF-!MPDBUJPO!PG!PCTUSVDUJPOT-!MPDBUJPO!PG!VUJMJUJFT-!FUD/!!UIF!JSSJHBUJPODPOUSBDUPS!TIBMM!NBLF!UIF!JSSJHBUJPO!QPJOU!PG!DPOOFDUJPO!BT!JOEJDBUFE!PO!QMBO!BOEDPPSEJOBUF!XJUI!PUIFS!XPSL! BT!SFRVJSFE/BSDIJUFDU!GPS!SFWJFX!QSJPS!UP!QVSDIBTJOH!FRVJQNFOU/BT!SFRVJSFE/JOEJDBUJWF!PG!UIF!XPSL!UP!CF!DPNQMFUFE/!BMM!JSSJHBUJPO!FRVJQNFOU-!QJQJOH!BOE!WBMWFMPDBUJPOT-!FUD/!TIPXO!XJUIJO!QBWFE!BSFBT!B SF!GPS!EFTJHO!DMBSJGJDBUJPO!BOE!TIBMM!POMZ!CFJOTUBMMFE!PO!PXOFS(T!QSPQFSUZ-!XJUIJO!DPOTUSVDUJPO!MJNJUT-!BOE!XJUIJO!QMBOUJOH!BSFBTVOMFTT!PUIFSXJTF!OPUFE!PO!QMBOT/!JSSJHBUJPO!DPOUSBDUPS!TIBMM!JOTUBMM!B MM!SFNPUF!DPOUSPMWBMWFT-!RVJDL!DPVQMFST-!BOE!JTPMBUJPO!WBMWFT-!JO!TISVC!QMBOUJOH!BSFBT!PS!BT!BQQSPWFE!CZPXOFS(T!SFQSFTFOUBUJWF!'!UIF!MBOETDBQF!JSSJHBUJPO!EFTJHOFS/!UP!UIF!FYUFOU!QPTTJCMF-!MPDBUFFMFDU SJD!SFNPUF!DPOUSPM!WBMWF!CPYFT!PVU!PG!EJSFDU!WJFX-!ZFU!BDDFTTJCMF/!!BWPJE!BOZDPOGMJDUT!CFUXFFO!UIF!TQSJOLMFS!TZTUFN-!QMBOUJOH!BOE!BSDIJUFDUVSBM!GFBUVSFT/NBJOMJOF!TMFFWJOH!PG!TVGGJDJFOU!TJ\[F-!VOEFS!B MM!QBWFE!BSFBT!JO!BEEJUJPO!UP!UIF!!TMFFWJOHTIPXO!PO!UIF!ESBXJOHT/UIF!NBYJNVN!GMPX!EFNBOE!PG!271!HQN!BU!FBDI!QPJOU!PG!DPOOFDUJPO/!UIF!JSSJHBUJPODPOUSBDUPS!TIBMM!WFSJGZ!XBUFS!QSFTTVSF!QSJPS!UP!DPOTUSVD UJPO/!BOZ!EJGGFSFODF!CFUXFFO!UIFXBUFS!QSFTTVSF!JOEJDBUFE!PO!UIF!ESBXJOHT!BOE!UIF!BDUVBM!QSFTTVSF!SFBEJOH!BU!UIFJSSJHBUJPO!QPJOU!PG!DPOOFDUJPO!TIBMM!CF!JNNFEJBUFMZ!SFQPSUFE!JO!XSJUJOH!UP!UIF!PXOFS(TBV UIPSJ\[FE!SFQSFTFOUBUJWF/!JG!UIF!QSFTTVSF!EJGGFSFODFT!BSF!OPU!JNNFEJBUFMZ!SFQPSUFE!QSJPSUP!CFHJOOJOH!DPOTUSVDUJPO-!UIF!JSSJHBUJPO!DPOUSBDUPS!TIBMM!BTTVNF!GVMM!SFTQPOTJCJMJUZ!GPSBMM!SFWJTJPOT!UP!UIF!J SSJHBUJPO!TZTUFN!EFFNFE!OFDFTTBSZ!CZ!UIF!PXOFS(T!SFQSFTFOUBUJWF!BOEBMM!DPTUT!BTTPDJBUFE!XJUI!UIPTF!SFWJTJPOT/!GPS!BSFBT!JEFOUJGJFE!GPS!TUBOEBSE!PWFSIFBETQSBZ-!JG!TUBUJD!QSFTTVSF!FYDFFET!91!QTJ-!B!QSF TTVSF!SFEVDFS!JT!SFRVJSFE/EJGGFSFODFT-!PS!EJGGFSFODFT!JO!UIF!DBMDVMBUFE!BSFB!EJNFOTJPOT!FYJTU!UIBU!NBZ!IBWF!OPU!CFFODPOTJEFSFE!JO!UIF!EFTJHO!PG!UIF!TZTUFN-!UIF!JSSJHBUJPO!DPOUSBDUPS!TIBMM!OPU!XJMMGVM MZJOTUBMM!UIF!JSSJHBUJPO!TZTUFN!BT!JOEJDBUFE!PO!UIF!DPOTUSVDUJPO!ESBXJOHT/!UIF!PXOFS(TBVUIPSJ\[FE!SFQSFTFOUBUJWF!TIBMM!CF!OPUJGJFE!JO!XSJUJOH!PG!BOZ!TVDI!PCTUSVDUJPOT!PSEJGGFSFODFT!QSJPS!UP!CFHJOOJOH !BOZ!JSSJHBUJPO!JOTUBMMBUJPO/!JG!OPUJGJDBUJPO!JT!OPU!SFDFJWFEQSJPS!UP!CFHJOOJOH!JOTUBMMBUJPO-!UIF!JSSJHBUJPO!DPOUSBDUPS!TIBMM!BTTVNF!GVMMSFTQPOTJCJMJUZ!GPS!BMM!SFWJTJPOT!UP!UIF!JSSJHBUJPO!TZTUFN!BT!E FFNFE!OFDFTTBSZ!CZ!PXOFS(TSFQSFTFOUBUJWF!BOE!BMM!DPTUT!BTTPDJBUFE!XJUI!UIPTF!SFWJTJPOT/UIFTF!UXP!EPDVNFOUT!NVTU!CF!CSPVHIU!UP!UIF!BUUFOUJPO!PG!UIF!MBOETDBQF!BSDIJUFDU!QSJPSUP!CJE!PQFOJOH/JODMVEJOH!JU FNT!OPU!TIPXO-!CVU!OFDFTTBSZ!UP!BDIJFWF!B!DPNQMFUF!BOE!PQFSBCMF!JSSJHBUJPOTZTUFN/!DPOUSBDUPS!UP!QSPWJEF!BMM!OFDFTTBSZ!QJQJOH-!WBMWFT-!QWD!TMFFWFT!GPS!BMM!QJQJOH!BOEXJSJOH!FUD/!!BMM!JSSJHBUJPO!XPSL!TI BMM!CF!JOTUBMMFE!QFS!NJOOFTPUB!QMVNCJOH!DPEF/QMBOUJOH!BSFBT!BOE!MJNJUT!XBUFS!GSPN!OPO.JSSJHBUFE!BSFBT/!UIF!JSSJHBUJPO!DPOUSBDUPS!TIBMMCF!SFTQPOTJCMF!GPS!GMVTIJOH!BOE!BEKVTUJOH!BMM!JSSJHBUJPO!IFBET!GP S!PQUJNVN!QFSGPSNBODFBOE!UP!QSFWFOU!PWFS!TQSBZ!BOE!SVOPGG!POUP!BSFBT!OPU!JOUFOEFE!GPS!JSSJHBUJPO/!UIJT!TIBMMJODMVEF!TFMFDUJOH!UIF!QSPQFS!UIF!BSD!QBUUFSO-!BEKVTUJOH!UIF!TQSBZ!SBEJVT!PG!UIF!JSSJHBUJPOI FBE!XJUI!QST!TDSFFOT!BOE0PS!BMTP!UISPUUMJOH!UIF!GMPX!DPOUSPM!BU!FBDI!WBMWF!UP!PCUBJOUIF!PQUJNVN!PQFSBUJOH!QSFTTVSF!GPS!FBDI!TZTUFN/FBDI!FMFDUSJD!DPOUSPM!WBMWF!TP!UIF!JSSJHBUJPO!IFBE!GBSUIFTU!BOE!IJHI FTU!JO!FMFWBUJPO!GSPNJUT!BTTPDJBUFE!DPOUSPM!WBMWF!GVODUJPOT!XJUIJO!UIF!PQFSBUJOH!QSFTTVSF!TIPXO!PO!UIFJSSJHBUJPO!MFHFOE!)OPU!UP!FYDFFE!6!QTJ!BCPWF!UIF!JOEJDBUFE!PQFSBUJOH!QSFTTVSF*/ JSSJHBUJPO!OPUFT;3/DPOUSBDUPS!UP!TVCNJU!DPNQMFUF!JSSJHBUJPO!TZTUFN!EFTJHO!TIPQ!ESBXJOHT!UP!MBOETDBQF4/NBLF!JSSJHBUJPO!QPJOU!PG!DPOOFDUJPO!BT!JOEJDBUFE!PO!QMBO!BOE!DPPSEJOBUF!XJUI!PUIFS!XPSL5/UIF!JSSJ HBUJPO!EFTJHO!QSFTFOUFE!JO!UIFTF!EPDVNFOUT!JT!JOUFOEFE!UP!CF!EJBHSBNNBUJD!BOE6/UIF!JSSJHBUJPO!DPOUSBDUPS!TIBMM!CF!SFTQPOTJCMF!GPS!JOTUBMMJOH!BMM!DPOUSPM!XJSF!BOE7/UIF!JSSJHBUJPO!TZTUFN!EFTJHO!JT!CBTF E!VQPO!UIF!NJOJNVN!PQFSBUJOH!QSFTTVSF!PG!96!QTJ!BOE8/XIFO!JU!JT!BQQBSFOU!UP!UIF!MBOETDBQF!DPOUSBDUPS!JO!UIF!GJFME!UIBU!PCTUSVDUJPOT-!HSBEF9/JSSJHBUJPO!TQFDJGJDBUJPOT!UBLF!QSFDFEFODF!PWFS!JSSJHBUJPO!Q MBOT/!BOZ!EJTDSFQBODJFT!CFUXFFO:/DPOUSBDUPS!JT!SFTQPOTJCMF!UP!QSPWJEF!BMM!JSSJHBUJPO!FRVJQNFOU!BOE!BQQVSUFOBODFT- 2/UIF!JSSJHBUJPO!DPOUSBDUPS!TIBMM!CF!SFTQPOTJCMF!GPS!GBNJMJBSJ\[JOH!UIFNTFMWFT!XJUI!BMM21/BMM!QSPEVDU!BQQMJDBUJPOT!BOE!JOTUBMMBUJPOT!NVTU!NFFU!NBOVGBDUVSFS(T!SFRVJSFNFOUT/22/GMPX!SBUFT!UISPVHI!QF!QJQ JOH!OPU!UP!FYDFFE!NBOVGBDUVSFS(T!SFDPNNFOEBUJPOT/23/EFTJHO!JOUFOU!JT!UP!QSPWJEF!BO!JSSJHBUJPO!TZTUFN!UIBU!QSPWJEFT!TVGGJDJFOU!XBUFS!UP!BMM24/UIF!JSSJHBUJPO!DPOUSBDUPS!TIBMM!CF!SFTQPOTJCMF!GPS!BEKVTUJ OH!UIF!QSFTTVSF!SFHVMBUPS!PO DPOUSBDUPS!UP!WFSJGZ!BMM!VOEFSHSPVOE!VUJMJUZ!MPDBUJPOT!QSJPS!UP!DPNNFODJOH!XPSL/DPOUBDU!HPQIFS!TUBUF!POF!BU!)762*.565.1113/DPOUSBDUPS!TIBMM!WFSJGZ!BMM!EJNFOTJPOT!BOE!TJUF!DPOEJUJPOT!TIPXO!PO!QMBOT!QS JPS!UPDPOTUSVDUJPO/!!OPUJGZ!MBOETDBQF!BSDIJUFDU!PS!PXOFST!SFQSFTFOUBUJWF!PG!NBKPSDPOUSBDUPS!JT!SFTQPOTJCMF!GPS!DPPSEJOBUJPO!PG!UIF!JOTUBMMBUJPO-!EFTJHO-!BOE!PQFSBUJPO!PGUIF!JSSJHBUJPO!TZTUFN!XJUIJO!M JNJUT!PG!XPSL/ EJTDSFQBODJFT!UIBU!XJMM!BGGFDU!DPOTUSVDUJPO!PQFSBUJPOT/EBNBHF!UP!QSPQFSUZ!GSPN!MBOETDBQF!XPSL!NVTU!CF!SFQBJSFE!BU!OP!DPTU!UP!UIF!PXOFS/ DPEFT-!XJUI!HSPVOE!XJSF<!NFFUJOH!O/F/D/!BOE!N/B/D/!SFRVJSFNFOUT/HBVHF;!23!BXH!IVOUFS!KBDLFUFE!EFDPEFS!DBCMF!GPS!VTF!JO!3!XJSF!TZTUFNT-!PS!FRVBM/POMZ!ECS!TQMJDF!LJU!JT!BMMPXFE-!PS!FRVBM/ OFDFTTBSZ-!BMM!35!W/B/D/!GJFME!TQMJDFT!UP!CF!OPUFE!PO!#BT.CVJMU#!ESBXJOHT!BOE!MPDBUFE!JOFDPOP!WBMWF!CPYFT!BOE!NBSLFE/ HFOFSBM!OPUFT;4/5/4/DPOUSPMMFS!QPXFS!TIBMM!CF!FYJTUJOH!XBMM!PVUMFU!XJUIJO!FYJTUJOH!CVJMEJOH/5/DPOUSPM!XJSF!TIBMM!CF!TPMJE!DPQQFS!XJSF!V/M/!BQQSPWFE!GPS!EJSFDU!CVSJBM!JO!HSPVOE/!NJOJNVN7/JOTUBMM!WBMWF !XJSFT!JO!POF!DPOUJOVPVT!QVMM!GSPN!WBMWFT!UP!DPOUSPMMFS-!XJUIPVU!TQMJDFT/!JG 2/3/FMFDUSJDBM!OPUFT;2/BMM!231!W/B/D/!QSJNBSZ-!BOE!35!W/B/D/!TFDPOEBSZ!QPXFS!UP!CF!JOTUBMMFE!BT!QFS!TUBUF!BOE!MPDBM3/BMM!XJSF!UP!CF!VM!BQQSPWFE!GPS!)DPOEVJU!3#*-!TJ\[F!QFS!NBOVGBDUVSFS(T!SFDPNNFOEBUJ PO/6/35!WBD!XJSF!TQMJDJOH!NBUFSJBM!TIBMM!CF!EJSFDU!CVSJBM!TQMJDF!LJU!BT!NBOVGBDUVSFSFE!CZ!4N/ Ysfgt;-2:4915:71`CSES-2:4915:71`YTOP-2:4915:71`YTYU-2:4915:71`YTQM PSVTFGPSBOZQVSQPTFPUIFSUIBOUIBUBVUIPSJ\[FECZTUBOUFDJTGPSCJEEFO/ Esbxjohobnf;W;\]2:49\]bdujwf\]2:4915:71\]DBE\]Exh\]2:4915:71D212/exh UIFDPQZSJHIUTUPBMMEFTJHOTBOEESBXJOHTBSFUIFQSPQFSUZPGTUBOUFD/SFQSPEVDUJPO QmpuEbuf;1303103131.:;1:bn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m D.C D.C D.CD.CD.C D.CD.C D.C C H. H .C H .C C.HC.HC.HC.HC.HC.H C.H D.C H.C N DMWU DMWU DMWUDMWU C D. G D .C m N G F T m F m N G F UB NH G F m N G N G m F N G#!CSBTT!R/D/W/!XJUI!TUBCJMJ\[FS 23 N G m F #!OP\[\[MF!.!TFF!TUSVDUVSBM!ESBXJOHT UVSG-!QFSFOOJBMT!'!TISVCT-PWFSIFBE!QPQ.VQ!TQSBZ!BOE!SPUPS 5 2 MFHFOE N G m N G F m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m G N F G m D m m NT NT.2 m S O 61 N G D F N G m m N F G 1 m N G m mm m m m m m F m m N G m m N m G m m mm F m m m m N m G N G mm F m N G m N m G F m m m N G N G m F m JOTUBMM!RVJDL!DPVQMFSJO!21#!SPVOE!WBMWF!CPY m N m G m N F G m m QPJOU!PG!DPOOFDUJPO m N FG m N UP!5#!JSSJHBUJPO!NBJOMJOF m G L L m O J M S m F O N m J G B B N I G D Q m m M m N B G N J m G m S m P N m G m N N G m F m N TT m UP!5#!JSSJHBUJPO QPJOU!PG!DPOOFDUJPONBJOMJOF m TT F N U m G m U m m F N P G mmm m m F m N N m G B F m m m M N F m G m F N F J G m m S F m N m G V F m B N G m M m F m N G m F m N m G F UP!5#!JSSJHBUJPO QPJOU!PG!DPOOFDUJPONBJOMJOF m m )UZQ/* N F JOTUBMM G m NT NT.2 m m F m mm HFOFSBM F TQSJOMFS0HVO F BOE!TUBOE!QJQF F m N N m G F m G F F F F m F m JSSJHBUJPO!BSFB mmmmmmmmmmm F m F m N N m G m G F m m m m F m F TMFFWF-!UZQ/ mmmmmmmmm 5#!JSSJHBUJPO F m TT N FFFFF FFFF FFFF F G F m FF m N F F G m F F F N m G m F N F G F F m F F F m N m G F F F F UP!5#!JSSJHBUJPO QPJOU!PG!DPOOFDUJPONBJOMJOF m TTTT V F F ?? ?? m m F F m D I m D D mm TT U J ?? m F E F ?? ??? Z m U m m m H O MT??? OV J FF P L m E D O M J J S ???V F C ? F ??m ???Z m m m F??F m L D F P F H?? I F . C m m XFMM F ?? F F m ?? ?? m ?FF F FF F ?? ?F ??F FFFFF FF ??F F F?? m??FFF F? ?F m F ???? F HQ ? I???? .FF m P C F ?????? Q ?? F I????F P??F ?? FF F ?? ??F F ?m?? mmmm ?? ???? m Q ?? m?? mm I F P?? ?? F Q I P ? m mmm mm mmmm mmmm mm mmmm mm mmm mm mmmm mm? m m ? ? ? Ysfgt;-2:4915:71`CSES-2:4915:71`YTOP-2:4915:71`YTYU-2:4915:71`YTQM PSVTFGPSBOZQVSQPTFPUIFSUIBOUIBUBVUIPSJ\[FECZTUBOUFDJTGPSCJEEFO/ Esbxjohobnf;W;\]2:49\]bdujwf\]2:4915:71\]DBE\]Exh\]2:4915:71D212/exh UIFDPQZSJHIUTUPBMMEFTJHOTBOEESBXJOHTBSFUIFQSPQFSUZPGTUBOUFD/SFQSPEVDUJPO QmpuEbuf;1303103131.:;23bn ESBXJOH.BOZFSSPSTPSPNJTTJPOTTIBMMCFSFQPSUFEUPTUBOUFDXJUIPVUEFMBZ/ UIFDPOUSBDUPSTIBMMWFSJGZBOECFSFTQPOTJCMFGPSBMMEJNFOTJPOT/EPOPUTDBMFUIF MJD/OP/EBUF; 57311 MBNPUUFQBSLJSSJHBUJPOFYQBOTJPO DK TJHOBUVSF; C EBUF 2:4915:71 MBNPUUFQBSLJSSJHBUJPOFYQBOTJPO QSJOUOBNF; LFMMJFN/TDIMFHFM VOEFSUIFMBXTPGUIFTUBUFPGNJOOFTPUB/ DFOUFSWJMMF-NJOOFTPUB TIFFU!OVNCFS BOEUIBUJBNBEVMZMJDFOTFEQSPGFTTJPOBMFOHJOFFS XBTQSFQBSFECZNFPSVOEFSNZEJSFDUTVQFSWJTJPO D2/13 SFWJTJPO JIFSFCZDFSUJGZUIBUUIJTQMBO-TQFDJGJDBUJPO-PSSFQPSU TVSWFZESBXOEFTJHOFEDIFDLFEBQQSPWFE QSPK/!OP/ OP F N G N G F N G N m G F m N G F N G m N G F m N G m F N G TU/!HFOFWJFWF(T!DIVSDI N G m F N m G L N O J G M O F J m B I N G D N CMEH/ G m N G N G m N G N m G N m G TT ? UP!5#!JSSJHBUJPO QPJOU!PG!DPOOFDUJPONBJOMJOF ?TT m ? N ? G ? ? N G m m mmmm N G m N m G m N G m m N G m N mm G N m G m m N G m N G m m N G m UP!5#!JSSJHBUJPO QPJOU!PG!DPOOFDUJPONBJOMJOF N m G m m N G mm N m G m m m N G N G ?m m m ? m m N G N G m ? m TMFFWF-!UZQ/ ? 5#!JSSJHBUJPO m N TT G m FFFFFFFF ? F F m W ? J F N G S N m m G E F F m N U F G U m N m P F G N B F m M m F N m G TTTT V m m? m m m TT ? m mm MT m m H . C m m ? m m m H . C m m?? m m ?? H .??? m C ? m m ?? ? ? m m m H? . C ? mm m m m m ? m m? m m mm mmmm mm mmm? m m m ? ? ? TQSXT 5191 O MFHFOE BMUFSOBUF!3;!HFOFSBM!JSSJHBUJPO!BSFBT BMUFSOBUF!2;!HFOFSBM!JSSJHBUJPO!BSFBT CBTF!CJE;!HFOFSBM!JSSJHBUJPO!BSFBT 1 BSUFTJBO!TQSJOH QSPUFDU!JO!QMBDF QSPUFDU!JO!QMBDF ESBJO!GSPN!TQSJOH IJEEFO!TQSJOH!QBSL EJSFDUJPOBMMZ!ESJMMFE Ysfgt;-2:4915:71`CSES-2:4915:71`YTOP-2:4915:71`YTYU-2:4915:71`YTQM PSVTFGPSBOZQVSQPTFPUIFSUIBOUIBUBVUIPSJ\[FECZTUBOUFDJTGPSCJEEFO/ Esbxjohobnf;W;\]2:49\]bdujwf\]2:4915:71\]DBE\]Exh\]2:4915:71D212/exh UIFDPQZSJHIUTUPBMMEFTJHOTBOEESBXJOHTBSFUIFQSPQFSUZPGTUBOUFD/SFQSPEVDUJPO QmpuEbuf;1303103131.:;31bn ESBXJOH.BOZFSSPSTPSPNJTTJPOTTIBMMCFSFQPSUFEUPTUBOUFDXJUIPVUEFMBZ/ UIFDPOUSBDUPSTIBMMWFSJGZBOECFSFTQPOTJCMFGPSBMMEJNFOTJPOT/EPOPUTDBMFUIF .ON.CIL:ETAD 00264 SLIATEDNOITCURTSNOC :ERUTANGIS BCJ DATE 193804960 NOISNAPXENOITAGIRRIKRAPETTOMAL :EMANTNIRP LEGELHCS.MEILLEK .ATOSENNIMFOETATSEHTFOSWALEHTREDNU ATOSENNIM,ELLIVRETNEC SHEET NUMBER REENIGNELANOISSEFORPDESNECILYLUDAMAITAHTDNA NOISIVREPUSTCERIDYMREDNUROEMYBDERAPERPSAW C8.01 REVISION TROPERRO,NOITACIFICEPS,NALPSIHTTAHTYFITRECYBEREHI SURVEYDRAWNDESIGNEDCHECKEDAPPROVED PROJ. NO. NO PLATE NO. ERO-10 APRIL 2017 LAST REVISION: 27" CATCH BASIN IN-PLACE ELEVATION VIEW ASSEMBLY MANHOLE COVER BEEHIVE CASTING INLET PROTECTION POLYESTER SLEEVE CENTERVILLE, MINNESOTA FILTER ASSEMBLY WIMCORD 27 ROYAL ENTERPRISES - MODEL NO 27 INFRASAFE SEDIMENT CONTROLBARRIER - DG.PRE MANUFACTURED UNIT BY CIRCLE "H" ENTERPRISES. ISOMETRIC VIEW DEVICES TO BE INSTALLED IMMEDIATELY UPON INSTALLATION OF CONCRETESTRUCTURE CONE OR TOP SLAB.DEVICES SHOWN ARE AS MANUFACTURED BY WIMCO. MODEL NO. OF UNITSHOWN: RD 27.OTHER APPROVED INLET PROTECTION DEVICES FOR BEEHIVE CASTINGS ARE: 6" PLATE NO. ERO-5 APRIL 2017 LAST REVISION: 6" "9 "4 1' TO 3' 8 STUDS 5/8"X11" OVERLAP LONGITUDINAL JOINTSMINIMUM OF 6" "4 3' MAX PIPE FIRST SECTIONLENGTH "2/17 OVERLAP END JOINTSMINIMUM OF 6" AND STAPLEOVERLAP AT 1.5' INTERVALS. 3'-6" X 3'-6" X 1'-0"FTG. (4)-#5 E.W. VALVE ANDSPRINKLER BYOTHERS TOP FLANGE SLEEVED FITTING HOOKED VERTS, #3 TIES @4" DIP 12" X 12" PIER W/ (4)-#610", (4) TIES @ 4" @ TOP INSTALLATION CENTERVILLE, MINNESOTA EROSION CONTROL BLANKET 2' F O 1' W NO LSPECIFICATIONS O IF T E C C6" E "6 A"8/5 R F I R D U S0 FOLLOW MANUFACTURERSSPRINKLER FOUNDATION DETAIL ANCHOR TRENCH (SEE DETAIL AND NOTES BELOW) A STAPLE PATTERN/DENSITY SHALL WITHOUT AN ANCHOR TRENCH ANCHOR TRENCH4. BACKFILL WITH NATURAL SOIL AND COMPACT 2. LAY BLANKET IN TRENCH3. STAPLE AT 1.5' INTERVALS5. BLANKET LENGTH SHALL NOT EXCEED 100' 1. DIG 6" X 6" TRENCH SLOPE SURFACE SHALL BE FREE OF ROCKS, SOIL CLUMPS,STICKS, VEHICLE IMPRINTS, AND GRASS. BLANKETS SHALL NOTE:HAVE GOOD SOIL CONTACT. "0-'8"6-'3 PLATE NO. ERO-1 APRIL 2017 LAST REVISION: 24" MINIMUMPOST EMBEDMENT STEEL POSTS:ATTACH FABRIC TO POSTSWITH MINIMUM 3 ZIP TIESIN TOP 8" OF FABRIC.MONOFILAMENT GEOTEXTILEFABRIC PER MNDOT TABLE3886-1 (MACHINE SLICED). (50 LB. TENSILE) PER POST 8"-12" DEPTH (PLUS 6" FLAP) MACHINE SLICE INSTALLATION OF STEEL POSTS, SILT FENCE MACHINE SLICED BEFORE A CENTERVILLE, MINNESOTA INSTALL THE POSTS AND PULL UP FABRIC TO ATTACH W THEN O L F E C A F MAXIMUM SPACING. R MINIMUM 5' LONG, 6'U S F APPROVED OR DIRECTED BY THE CITY. SILT FENCE INSTALLATION METHOD. HEAVY DUTY (ERO-1B) SILT FENCE INSTALLATION METHODS SHOULD ONLY BE USED WHENLOCATED NEXT TO CURB AND GUTTER DUE TO SNOW PLOWING. O N AFTER "SLICING" IN THE FABRIC ANDAT A UNIFORM HEIGHT. NOTE:1. THE MACHINE SLICED METHOD (THIS DETAIL) IS THE STANDARD2. REMOVE SILT FENCE AFTER ESTABLISHMENT PERIOD IS MET.3.CITY WILL NOT BE RESPONSIBLE FOR DAMAGE TO SILT FENCECOMPACTION:DRIVE INSTALLATION EQUIPMENT OVER THE "SLICE" WHILE FABRIC IS LAYINGON THE GROUND. STEEL FENCE POST (T-POST), O STEEL POSTS: FROM FABRIC.I TO FACE AWAYA POST NOTCHES T C E R I D RDRB_069408391,:sferX .NEDDIBROFSICETNATSYBDEZIROHTUATAHTNAHTREHTOESOPRUPYNAROFESURO gwd.108C069408391\\gwD\\DAC\\069408391\\evitca\\8391\\:V:emangniwarD NOITCUDORPER.CETNATSFOYTREPORPEHTERASGNIWARDDNASNGISEDLLAOTSTHGIRYPOCEHT mp44:2-0202/02/20:etaDtolP .YALEDTUOHTIWCETNATSOTDETROPEREBLLAHSSNOISSIMOROSRORREYNA-GNIWARD EHTELACSTONOD.SNOISNEMIDLLAROFELBISNOPSEREBDNAYFIREVLLAHSROTCARTNOCEHT .ON.CIL:ETAD 87035 NALPETISLACIRTCELE MTFMTF :ERUTANGIS CWOCWO BCJ DATE 193804960 NOISNAPXENOITAGIRRIKRAPETTOMAL :EMANTNIRP KCIRTAPZTIF.TLEAHCIM .ATOSENNIMFOETATSEHTFOSWALEHTREDNU ATOSENNIM,ELLIVRETNEC SHEET NUMBER REENIGNELANOISSEFORPDESNECILYLUDAMAITAHTDNA E101 NOISIVREPUSTCERIDYMREDNUROEMYBDERAPERPSAW REVISION TROPERRO,NOITACIFICEPS,NALPSIHTTAHTYFITRECYBEREHI SURVEYDRAWNDESIGNEDCHECKEDAPPROVED PROJ. NO. NO l C-B C-B C-BC-BC-B C-BC-B C-B B G- G -B G -B B-GB-GB-GB-GB-GB-G B-G C-B G-B M CLVT CLVT CLVTCLVT B C- F C -B l M F E S l E l M F E TA MG F E l M F M F l E M F G M N F I l K R E A P E R U M T F U lF M F E l 100 Ml F M E F l D l L R E I N 50 M F F C E R M E F l C C O S l E R U T M E U F F 0 l M F l ll l l l l l E l l M Fl l Ml Fl l ll E l l l l M l F M F ll E l M F l Ml F E l l l M F M F l E l l Ml Fl M E F l l l M T EFC l ML l L F A B Y E K K L l 2 N L I # O L R V Dl E NLL M l L IE F I A A A F MB - H F T C F P l O S / l E S L l A B M A 1 F # M I l F D LL Ll E I A R F B l- T F O O S M / l FE S l M M A F B l E 3 # l M SS D L Ll L E AI F B l SS - E T F O M T S l / F E S l T A B l l E M O F lll l l E l M M l F A E l l l L M E l F l E M E I F l l R R E E lC IT L N M E C l F U IH PS E l A M Fl L l E l M F l E D N l U M l O F R E G l Y A l L P M E F l MS MS-1 l l E l ll E E E l M Ml F E l F E E E El E l TO IDENTIFY THE NEW CIRCUITS. PROIVDE 2 - 20AMP, 1 POLE CIRCUITBREAKERS IN THE EXISTING GENERALELECTRICAL PANELBOARD TO POWER THENEW FLOW METER AND THE NEW LIGHTPOLE. UPDATE THE PANELBOARD SCHEDULE lllllllllll E l E l M Ml F l F E l l l l E l E lllllllll E l SS M EEEEE EEEE EEEE E F E NEW FLOW METER TO BE FURNISHED ANDINSTALLED BY OTHERS AS PART OF A SEPARATEPROJECT. PROVIDE 120VAC POWER FROMEXISTING BUILDING. l EE l M E E F l E E NEW LIGHT / POLE FOR SLEDDING HILL. EXACTLOCATION OF LIGHT POLE WILL BE STAKED BYENGINEER PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. E M l F l D E M E L F E E K E I R F A l P R E E E E E C T C A l O K Ml S S F E E E E l SSSS U E E >> >> Gl l N I E E K l R C H l C A C ll SSP T I >>AND 2 SPARE. 1.25"C-6#10,1#10G FORPOWER TO FLOW METER,POWER TO LIGHT POLE, l E D E >> >>> Y l T l l l G N LS>>> NU I EE O K l D C N L I I R >>>U E B > E >>l 0.75"C-2#10,1#10G >>>Y l l l E>>E l K C E FM O E G>> H E - B l lWELL E >> J E E l >> >> l >EE E EE E >> >E >>E EEEEE EE >>E E E>> l>>EEE E> >E lE >>>> E GP > H>>>> -EE l O B E >>>>>> P >> E H>>>>E O>>E >> EE E >> >>E E >l>> llll >> >>>> lP >> l>> llH E O>> >> E P H O > l lll ll llll llll ll llll ll lll ll llll ll> l l > >0.75"C-2#10,1#10G > 930920910900890880 LPSX_069408391,TXSX_069408391,ONSX_069408391,RDRB_069408391,:sferX .NEDDIBROFSICETNATSYBDEZIROHTUATAHTNAHTREHTOESOPRUPYNAROFESURO gwd.101E069408391\\gwD\\DAC\\069408391\\evitca\\8391\\:V:emangniwarD NOITCUDORPER.CETNATSFOYTREPORPEHTERASGNIWARDDNASNGISEDLLAOTSTHGIRYPOCEHT ma73:9-0202/02/20:etaDtolP .YALEDTUOHTIWCETNATSOTDETROPEREBLLAHSSNOISSIMOROSRORREYNA-GNIWARD EHTELACSTONOD.SNOISNEMIDLLAROFELBISNOPSEREBDNAYFIREVLLAHSROTCARTNOCEHT City of Centerville LaMotte Park Stormwater Reuse System Expansion Opinion of Probable Costs February 20, 2020 EstimatedEstimatedEstimated ItemQuantityUnit PriceCost No.Unit BASE BID: MOBILIZATION 1LS1$8,000.00$8,000.00 TRAFFIC CONTROL 2LS1$2,000.00$2,000.00 IRRIGATION IMPROVEMENTS - INSTALL GUN-STYLE HEAD 3EA3$1,000.00$3,000.00 IRRIGATION IMPROVEMENTS - LAMOTTE INFIELD AREA 4LS1$20,000.00$20,000.00 IRRIGATION IMPROVEMENTS - HIDDEN SPRING PARK 5LS1$22,000.00$22,000.00 LIGHT FOR SLEDDING HILL 6LS1$6,000.00$6,000.00 RESTORATION 7LS1$4,000.00$4,000.00 STREET SWEEPER WITH PICKUP BROOM 8HR20$150.00$3,000.00 TOTAL BASE BID $68,000.00 ALTERNATE NO. 1: SPRWS IRRIGATION IRRIGATION SYSTEM - AREA 5 9LS1$14,000.00$14,000.00 RESTORATION - AREA 5 10LS1$2,000.00$2,000.00 TOTAL ALTERNATE NO. 1: SPRWS IRRIGATION $16,000.00 ALTERNATE NO. 2: ST. GENEVIEVE'S IRRIGATION IRRIGATION SYSTEM - AREA 6 11LS1$20,000.00$20,000.00 RESTORATION - AREA 6 12LS1$3,000.00$3,000.00 TOTAL ALTERNATE NO. 2: ST. GENEVIEVE'S IRRIGATION $23,000.00 TOTAL ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION - INCLUDING ALTERNATES $107,000.00 CONTINGENCIES $20,000.00 ADMINISTRATION AND ENGINEERING $38,000.00 $165,000.00 TOTAL ESTIMATED PROJECT COST - INCLUDING ALTERNATES LaMotte_Irrigation_estimate.02.19.2020.xlsm CITY OF CENTERVILLE REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION Agenda Item # Department: Requested Council Meeting Date: February 26, 2020 Administration IX.1 TITLE OF ISSUE: Infrastructure Accountability Legislation Support BACKGROUND AND SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION: For quite some time, the League of Minnesota Cities and other organizations have been lobbying the legislature to pass a law which would allow some mechanism to charge developers for road improvements necessitated by their developments, much like exists for sewer, water, stormwater and other similar systems. Since there has not been this explicit authority, cities have made other attempts to collect the funds and have been successfully sued on several occasions. This leaves cities with alternatives such as special assessments, burdening existing taxpayers, or other options which are either untenable or unfair or both. Cities are committed to fair legislation that requires engineering studies to justify fees, much like the other utilities. COST AND SOURCE(S) OF FUNDING: No direct cost. REQUESTED COUNCIL ACTION: Motion to approve Resolution 20-0XX Supporting Infrastructure Accountability. SUPPORTED DOCUMENTS ATTACHED Motion By: ____________________________________ Resolution Ordinance Contract Minutes Plan Map Second By: ____________________________________ Vote Record: Aye Nay _____ _____ Plans Other (specify) ____________ _____ _____ Love _____ _____ Paar _______________________________________________________________ _____ _____ Koski _____ _____ Montain _______________________________________________________________ Administration Department Use: Refer to: _________________________________ Consent Tabled Until: ______________________________ Regular Other: ___________________________________ League Urges Cities to Pass Resolution Supporting Infrastructure Accountability The LeagueÓs sample resolution supports legislation that would provide statutory clarity for cities and developers on the collection of infrastructure development fees for residential development. The League is urging city councils to adopt a resolution providing clarity after the , where the court found there was no existing statutory authority to collect fees for future infrastructure improvements when approving residential development. le resolution (doc) ation that would authorize cities to collect infrastructure development fees to fund municipal street improvements as a necessary component of growth. View the Infrastructure Fee Fact Sheet (pdf) Please act before March 13 Growing cities have tried to address infrastructure needs resulting from residential development after the decision. Unfortunately, these efforts have been met with litigation. The Legislature needs to act. The League urges your city to pass this or a substantially similar resolution and to convey your support to your legislators. Resolutions passed between now and the first legislative dead particularly helpful to the Send your resolution to state leaders and LMC To maximize the impact of your resolution, please send copies of your adopted council resolution to: Gov. Tim Walz: Office of the Governor, 130 State Capitol, 75 Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd., St. Paul, MN 55155 Your legislators Ted Bengtson: Intergovernmental Relations Administrative Coordinator, League of Minnesota Cities, 145 University Ave. W., St. Paul, MN 55103; tbengtson@lmc.org. Read the current issue of the Cities Bulletin 3131 MFBHVF!PG!NJOOFTPUB!DJUJFT DJUZ!JTTVF!! GBDU!TIFFU! Jogsbtusvduvsf!gfft!tvqqpsu!efwfmpqnfou!boe!ubyqbzfs!gbjsoftt! QSPCMFN; Jg!opu!beesfttfe-!fyjtujoh!ubyqbzfst! Xifo!b!ofx!tvcejwjtjpo!qspqptbm!jt!qsftfoufe!up! xjmm!gppu!uif!cjmm!gps!tusffut!uibu!bsf! pomz!offefe!cfdbvtf!pg!qspqptfe! uibu!efwfmpqnfou!xjmm!dpoofdu!xjui!uif!sftu!pg!uif! dpnnvojuz!uispvhi!ofx!djuz!tusffut-!ps!ipx!uif!beefe! sftjefoujbm!efwfmpqnfou/ dbqbdjuz!xjmm!jnqbdu!fyjtujoh!djuz!tusffut/ Nboz!djujft!qmbo!tusffu!xpsl!zfbst!jo!bewbodf-!boe!ofx! efwfmpqnfou!dsfbuft!beejujpobm!efnboe/ Ipxfwfs-!mfhbm!joufsqsfubujpo!pg!dvssfou!mbx!epft!opu! bmmpx!gps!djujft!up!dpmmfdu!gfft!gspn!efwfmpqfst!up!ifmq! qbz!gps!uiftf!gvuvsf!jowftunfout/!! MFBHVF.TVQQPSUFE!TPMVUJPO; Uif!Mfbhvf!tvqqpsut!IG33:7!0!TG3553!boe!IG33:8! 0!TG3554!)Sfq/!Csbe!Ubclf-!Tfo/!Fsjd!Qsbuu*-!qspwjejoh! uif!ofdfttbsz!tubuvupsz!bvuipsjuz!gps!djujft!up!cf!bcmf! up!dibshf!efwfmpqfst!gfft!uibu!dpwfs!uif!jogsbtusvduvsf! jnqspwfnfout!uibu!bsf!offefe!cfdbvtf!pg!uif!ofx! sftjefoujbm!efwfmpqnfou/! CBDLHSPVOE; EJE!ZPV!LOPX@ Uif!Njooftpub!Tvqsfnf!Dpvsu!gpvoe!jo!Ibstube! w/!Djuz!pg!Xppecvsz!uibu!djujft!ep!opu!ibwf!uif! Xjuipvu!mfhjtmbujwf!bdujpo-!djujft!xip! tubuvupsz!bvuipsjuz!ofdfttbsz!up!jnqptf!b!gff! xbou!up!hspx!nvtu!sfmz!po!qspqfsuz! gps!gvuvsf!tusffu!jnqspwfnfout!xifo!bqqspwjoh! ubyft!up!qbz!gps!efwfmpqnfou.sfmbufe! sftjefoujbm!efwfmpqnfou/!Djujft!offe!b!dmfbs!boe! jogbtusvduvsf/!Jg!uiftf!djujft!epou! mbxgvm!qbui!gpsxbse!up!tvqqpsu!efwfmpqnfou!xijmf! ibwf!uif!uby!dbqbdjuz!up!bctpsc! qspufdujoh!uif!joufsftut!pg!dvssfou!ubyqbzfst/ uiftf!dptut-!uifz!nbz!cf!gpsdfe!up! gpsfhp!ofx!efwfmpqnfou!foujsfmz/ Gps!npsf!jogpsnbujpo; Jsfof!Lbp-!Joufshpwfsonfoubm!Sfmbujpot!Dpvotfm Qipof;!)762*!392.2371 Fnbjm;!jlbpAmnd/psh xxx/mnd/psh0cvjmejusjhiu ª3131!Mfbhvf!pg!Njooftpub!Djujft/!Bmm!Sjhiut!Sftfswfe/ RESOLUTION #20-0__ A Resolution Supporting Infrastructure Accountability WHEREAS, populations in Minnesota cities are growing statewide; and WHEREAS, the development and construction associated with that growth are driving the need for road improvements, street oversizing, street redesign, and street reconstruction; and WHEREAS, municipal statutory authority appropriately exists for fees to support added need for parks, sewer, and water; and WHEREAS, this municipal authority does not exist for infrastructure development fees; and WHEREAS, city streets are one of the four major types of infrastructure local government is responsible to provide to protect public safety and health, and city streets represent a separate but integral piece of the network of roads supporting movement of people and goods; and WHEREAS, existing funding mechanisms, such as Municipal State Aid (MSA), property taxes, and special assessments have limited applications, leaving cities under-equipped to address growing needs; and WHEREAS, neighborhood streets are constructed according to city standards by developers; and WHEREAS, funding sources for larger streets and intersections to support new developments have historically come from infrastructure development fees; and WHEREAS, the Minnesota Supreme Court found in Harstad v. City of Woodbury that no statutory authority existed for these infrastructure development fees; and WHEREAS, cities should not be forced to make current residents and businesses pay for costs of growth through local taxes but rather by those that are responsible for the growth; and WHEREAS, cities are finding it difficult to develop adequate funding systems to support needed infrastructure development related to growth while complying with existing state statutes; and WHEREAS, cities need flexible policies and greater resources in order to meet growing demands for street improvements. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CENTERVILLE that this Council supports legislation that would authorize cities to collect infrastructure development fees to fund municipal street improvements as a necessary component of growth. ADOPTED by the _______________ City Council this ____ day of __________________, 2020. ____________________________________ Mayor, Jeff Paar _________________________________ City Clerk, Teresa Bender CITY OF CENTERVILLE REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION Agenda Item # Department: Requested Council Meeting Date: February 26, 2020 Administration IX.2 TITLE OF ISSUE: 2020 Goals BACKGROUND AND SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION: During the City Council's recent retreat, 2018/19 goals were reviewed and suggestions were made for potential 2020 goals. Attached is a short presentation on our 2020 Goals. Another take away from the retreat was that there should be renewed emphasis on tying our actions, throughout the year back to these simple set of goals. COST AND SOURCE(S) OF FUNDING: Various REQUESTED COUNCIL ACTION: Motion to adopt 2020 Goals, as presented. SUPPORTED DOCUMENTS ATTACHED Motion By: ____________________________________ Resolution Ordinance Contract Minutes Plan Map Second By: ____________________________________ Vote Record: Aye Nay _____ _____ Goals presentation Other (specify) ____________ _____ _____ Love _____ _____ Paar _______________________________________________________________ _____ _____ Koski _____ _____ Montain _______________________________________________________________ Administration Department Use: Refer to: _________________________________ Consent Tabled Until: ______________________________ Regular Other: ___________________________________ February 26, 2020 2020 and Beyond City of Centerville Economic DevelopmentSuccession PlanningCommunity Building Review of our 2018/2019 Goals Economic DevelopmentOrganizational ResilienceCommunity Building Revised Goals for 2020 City Hall RenovationMain Street EnhancementsEDA Revolving Loan/Grant ProgramBlock 7 Redevelopment1737 Main Street RedevelopmentNew LogoNew Website ModernizationRevitalizationRebranding Economic Development 2020 Goals in Action Succession and Retention PlanningInstitutional Knowledge PreservationOrdinance and Policy EnhancementsLong-Term Financial Management and Capital Improvement Plans Organizational Resilience 2020 Goals in Action Recreational Program GrowthPark EnhancementsNeighborhood EngagementDiverse Communication StrategiesExpanded Volunteer OpportunitiesSchool/City Relationship Building Community Building 2020 Goals in Action