HomeMy WebLinkAbout2020-09-09 CC Packet
CITY OF CENTERVILLE
COUNCIL MEETING
AGENDA
Wednesday, September 9, 2020
6:30 p.m.
Meeting available via Zoom Videoconferencing
https://zoom.us/j/478824301
Meeting ID: 478 824 301
312-626-6799 (for audio only)
COUNCIL MEETING (6:30 PM)
I. CALL TO ORDER
1. Roll Call
II. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
III. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
IV. APPOINTMENTS/PRESENTATIONS
1. None
V. PUBLIC HEARING
1.
VI. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
1. July 22, 2020 City Council Work Session and Regular Meeting Minutes (pg. X)
VII. CONSENT AGENDA
1. City of Centerville August 27, 2020 through September 9, 2020 Claims (Check
#34190-34231) & (1570E-1575E) (pg. )
2. Centennial Lake Police Department Claims through September 2, 2020 (Check
#13368-13391), (E2020033-2020034) & Payroll Check #13376-13378) (pg. )
3. Centennial Fire District Claims thru September 2, 2020 (Check #8891-8895) &
E2020022-2020024) (pg. )
4. Escrow Agreement/Right of Entry and Cons
Road (Connection to City Water) (pg. )
5. Encroachment Agreement 1707 Dup
6.
Utility Improvements (pg. )
VIII. OLD BUSINESS
1. Preliminary General Fund Budget (Discussion Only) (pg. )
2. CARES Act Funding Plan
a. Funding Allocation Plan Review (pg. )
b. Approval of September Submittal (pg. )
IX. NEW BUSINESS
1. Wellhead Protection Plan, Part 2 (pg. )
X. COUNCIL/ADMINISTRATOR ANNOUNCEMENTS
1. Administrator/Engineer Report (pg. )
2. Council Reports
a.Lakso
Anoka County Fire Protection Council
Centennial Fire Steering Committee
Parks & Recreation
b. Koski
Centennial Fire Steering Committee
Planning & Zoning Commission
c. Montain
Centennial Lakes Police Governing Board
North Metro Telecommunications Commission
d. Wilharber
Economic Development Authority
e. Love
Centennial Lakes Police Governing Board
Economic Development Authority
Other Mayoral Reports
XI. RECESS REGULAR CITY COUCNIL MEETING
XII. ADJOURNMENT
INFORMATIONAL MATERIAL
None
REMINDERS
All Meetings via Zoom Videoconferencing
MOVIE IN THE PARK
CITY OF CENTERVILLE
REQUEST FOR
COUNCIL ACTION
Agenda Item # Department: Requested Council Meeting Date:
September 9, 2020
Public Works
V.1
TITLE OF ISSUE:
Public Input Meeting - Wellhead Protection Plan - Part 2
BACKGROUND AND SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION:
As part of the city's requirements to operate a municipal water supply system, we are expected to prepare a
Wellhead Protection Plan (WHPP). Part 1 of this plan was completed a year or so ago and we are now
completing Part 2 of the plan. The attached draft of that plan (Part 2) has been submitted to surrounding
jurisdictions and other agencies for comment. Also required, is for the city to provide an opportunity to the
pubic to give input on the proposed WHPP Part 2 at a Public Input Meeting.
Councilmembers may wish to focus their review of the draft plan, to Section 8.3 - Implementation Plan. This
section outlines our commitments over the next few years.
COST AND SOURCE(S) OF FUNDING:
Costs for preparation of WHPP Part 2 previously approved. Future costs are detailed in the plan.
REQUESTED COUNCIL ACTION:
The Council should have staff and consultants present a summary of the draft WHPP Part 2 and open a public
input session to allow comment from the public.
SUPPORTED DOCUMENTS ATTACHED
Motion By: ____________________________________
Resolution Ordinance Contract Minutes Plan Map
Second By: ____________________________________
Vote Record: Aye Nay
_____
_____
WHPP Part 2 (draft), public hearing notice
Other (specify) ____________
_____ _____ Love
_____ _____
_______________________________________________________________
_____ _____ Koski
_____ _____ Montain _______________________________________________________________
Administration Department Use:
Refer to: _________________________________
Consent
Tabled Until: ______________________________
Regular
Other: ___________________________________
Stantec Consulting Services Inc.
733 Marquette Avenue, Suite 1000, MinneapolisMN 55402-2309
Date: June 24, 2020
To: John D. Clark, Metropolitan Council
Anoka County Environmental Health
Washington County Environmental Health
Jen Sorensen, Minnesota Department of Natural Resources
Michele Landau, City of Hugo
Jeff Karlson, City of Lino Lakes
Nick Tomczik, Rice Creek Watershed District
Phil Belfiori, Vadnais Lake Area Watershed Management Organization
John Freitag, Minnesota Department of Health
Trudi Witkowski, Minnesota Department of Health
Robyn Hoerr, Minnesota Rural Water Association
Re: City of Centerville - Part 2 Wellhead Protection Plan
On behalf of the City of Centerville, we are supplying this draft Wellhead Protection Plan to neighboring and
overlapping local units of government, as required by Minnesota Wellhead Protection Rule, part 4720.5350,
subpart 1. The goal of the Wellhead Protection Plan is to prevent human-caused contaminants from entering
the public water supply wells and to protect all who use Centerville’s water supply system from adverse
health effects associated with groundwater contamination. According to the Minnesota Wellhead Protection
Rule 4720.5350, subpart 2; local units of government have 60 days to review and comment on the plan. We
ask that you provide any comments you may have on or before August 25, 2020. Please use this address
when providing comments:
Paul Palzer
City of Centerville
1880 Main Street
Centerville, MN 55038
The draft report is being provided as an electronic PDF file which can be downloaded using a link being
provided to you via e-mail. If you have trouble viewing the report file or require an electronic copy mailed to
you, please contact me for assistance at (651) 775-6532.
The City of Centerville will also be holding a public hearing on August 26, 2020 at 6:30pm at City Hall (1880
Main Street) and will invite comments from the public regarding the Wellhead Protection Plan. If you wish to
attend and provide your comments at that time, you are invited to do so.
Thank you for your assistance with Centerville’s wellhead protection efforts.
Regards,
STANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES INC.
Mark Janovec
Project Manager
Phone: (651) 775-6532
Mark.janovec@stantec.com
cc: Mark Statz, City Administrator
Paul Palzer, Public Works Director
DRAFT
CITY OF CENTERVILLE
WELLHEAD PROTECTION PLAN
PART 2 (AMENDMENT)
MAY 29, 2020
Stantec Project No. 193803358
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0 INTRODUCTION...............................................................................................................7
2.0 WELLHEAD PROTECTION AREA AND DRINKING WATER SUPPLY
MANAGEMENT AREA......................................................................................................8
3.0 VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT....................................................................................9
4.0 DATA ELEMENTS............................................................................................................ 10
4.1 Geology.............................................................................................................................. 10
4.2 Groundwater Quality.......................................................................................................... 10
4.3 Groundwater Quantity........................................................................................................ 10
5.0 CONTAMINANT SOURCE INVENTORY...................................................................... 10
5.1 Introduction........................................................................................................................ 11
5.2 Land Use............................................................................................................................ 11
5.3 Parcel-Specific Land and Water Uses................................................................................. 11
5.4 Wells.................................................................................................................................. 12
5.5 Point Sources..................................................................................................................... 12
5.6 Public Utility Services........................................................................................................ 13
5.7 Former and Active Sites of Contamination.......................................................................... 13
5.8 Summary............................................................................................................................ 14
6.0 PROJECTED CHANGES TO THE ENVIRONMENT, LAND USE, AND SURFACE
AND GROUNDWATER.................................................................................................... 15
6.1 Changes to the Environment and Land Use........................................................................ 15
6.2 Changes to Surface and Groundwater................................................................................ 15
7.0 PROBLEMS AND OPPORTUNITIES............................................................................. 16
7.1 Problems............................................................................................................................ 16
7.2 Opportunities..................................................................................................................... 16
7.3 Status of Existing Governmental Controls Concerning Water and Related Land Use.......... 17
2
8.0 WELLHEAD PROTECTION GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND IMPLEMENTATION
PLAN.................................................................................................................................. 18
8.1 Goals.................................................................................................................................. 18
8.2 Objectives........................................................................................................................... 18
8.3 Implementation Plan.......................................................................................................... 19
9.0 GUIDANCE FOR USE BY CITY OF CENTERVILLESTAFF..................................... 27
WELLHEAD PROTECTION PLANNING............................................................................. 27
9.1 Activities Affecting Wellhead Protection............................................................................ 27
10.0 PROGRAM EVALUATION............................................................................................ 29
11.0 EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS AND CONTINGENCY PLAN............................... 30
12.0 LOCAL GOVERNMENT REVIEW AND PUBLIC HEARING................................... 31
FIGURES
Figure 1:Drinking Water Supply Management Area (DWSMA)
Figure 2A: Western Wells in DWSMA
Figure 2B: Eastern Wells in DWSMA
Figure 3: Tanks, Spills and Leaks in DWSMA
Figure 4: Sanitary Sewer and Storm Sewer Systems
APPENDICES
Appendix A: Wells and Potential Contaminant Source Inventory
Appendix B:Land Use Maps
Appendix C: City of Centerville Consumer Confidence Report
Appendix D: Notice of Approval of Water SupplyPlan
Appendix E: Correspondence
Appendix F:IWMZ Inventory
Appendix G: Documentation of Public Hearing
Appendix H: City of CentervillePart 1 Wellhead Protection Plan (Amendment)
3
PUBLIC WATER SUPPLY
NAME: City of Centerville
ADDRESS: 1880 Main Street
Centerville, MN 55038
TELEPHONE NUMBER: (651) 429-3232 FAX NUMBER: (651) 429-8269
WELLHEAD PROTECTION MANAGER
NAME: Paul Palzer, Public Works Director
ADDRESS: 1880 Main Street
Centerville, MN 55038
TELEPHONE NUMBER:(651) 429-3232 FAX NUMBER: (651) 429-8269
E-MAIL:ppalzer@centervillemn.com
CONSULTANT/TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE
NAME: Mark Janovec, Stantec
ADDRESS: 733 Marquette Avenue, Suite 1000
Minneapolis, MN 55402
TELEPHONE NUMBER: (612) 712-2000
E-MAIL: mark.janovec@stantec.com
4
DOCUMENTATION LIST
STEP DATE PERFORMED
Part 1 Approval Notice Received from MDH January 22, 2019
Scoping 2 Meeting Held (4720.5349, subp. 1) April 10, 2019
Scoping Decision Notice Received (4720.5340, subp. 2) May 3, 2019
Remaining Portion of Plan Submitted to Local Units of
Government (LGUs) (4720.5350, subp. 1 & 2)
Review Received From Local Units of Government
(4720.5350, subp.2)
Review Considered (4720.5350, subp. 3)
Public Hearing Conducted (4720.5350, subp. 4)
Remaining Portion WHP Plan Submitted
(4720.5360, subp. 1)
Approved Review Notice Received
5
PUBLIC WATER SUPPLY WELL INFORMATION
Well Unique Casing Well Year
*
Status
AquiferVulnerability
NameNumberDepth (ft)Depth (ft)Built
Non-
Well 1 511091CJDN (Jordan) 200267Emergency1988
Vulnerable
OPDC (Prairie du
Well 2 512748101187Primary 1993Vulnerable
Chien)
*See the Part 1 plan (Appendix H)for explanation of well vulnerability.
6
1.0 INTRODUCTION
Wellhead protection isa means of safeguarding public water supply wells by preventing contaminants
from entering the area that contributes water to the well or wellfield over a period of time. This
program is now required in Minnesota since the Minnesota Department of Health (MDH)
implemented its Wellhead Protection Rules in November 1997. The MDH initiated its Wellhead
Protection Program in response to the 1986 Amendments to the Safe Drinking Water Act and MDH’s
statutory authority is granted in the Minnesota Groundwater Protection Act of 1989. The City of
Centerville originally completed its Wellhead Protection Plan in 2007.
The City is required to complete an amendment of the Plan to cover the next ten years.Centerville
completedits Part 1Wellhead Protection Plan amendment in December 2018 (which was approved by
the MDHin January 2019). The Part 1 Plandelineated the capture zones for the City’s wells and
determined the vulnerability of the aquifers that supply these wells.This report is the amended Part 2
Wellhead Protection Plan that inventories potential sources of contamination, identifies problems and
opportunities for managing these contamination sources, and develops a management plan to mitigate
risks of groundwater contamination.
The City of Centervillecurrently operates one primaryproduction wellfor municipal water supply
purposes, with a second well available as an emergency backup.Bothwells are within City limits.
The primary well iscompleted in the Prairie duChien Aquifer, while the emergency backup well is
completed in the deeper Jordan Aquifer. A detailed description of the geologic and hydrogeologic
setting of Centerville’swater supply system is presented in City of CentervilleWellhead Protection
Plan Part 1 (Amendment). See Appendix H. The rest of this report is used to summarize the wellhead
protection area delineation analysis, the vulnerability assessment, and to present the contents of the
wellhead protection plan.
7
193803358
Stantec Consulting Services, Inc.
2.0 WELLHEAD PROTECTION AREA AND DRINKING WATER
SUPPLY MANAGEMENT AREA
The wellhead protection area (WHPA) and drinking water supply management area (DWSMA)
delineation analyses were conducted in accordance with Minnesota Department of Health’s wellhead
protection rules. As a result, the following criteria were considered in making the delineation
analysis: 1) theaquifer’s hydraulic conductivity, 2) the groundwater flow direction, 3) the average
daily pumping rate from each of the existing wells, 4) hydrogeologic boundaries, and 5) time of travel.
Each of these criteria were factored into the development of a groundwater flow model that was
ultimately used to conduct the delineation analysis. The results of this analysis (i.e., the WHPA and
DWSMA) are presented in Figure 1 for the City’swells. Additional details on the delineation analysis
is presented in City of CentervilleWellhead Protection Plan, Part 1 (Amendment), prepared by
Stantec (December 2018). See Appendix H.The delineation was approved by the MDH in January
2019.
8
193803358
Stantec Consulting Services, Inc.
3.0 VULNERABILITYASSESSMENT
Two separate assessments were undertaken to determine the vulnerability of the City's water supply.
The firstconsisted of an assessment of the vulnerability of the Prairie du Chien-Jordan aquifer to
contamination within the identified DWSMA. This assessment was completed according to MDH
guidelines and recommended methodology.
The second assessment was a wellvulnerability assessment for the City’s wells. The well
vulnerability assessment was also completed using MDH guidelines. A description of the two
assessments is presented in City of CentervilleWellhead Protection Plan, Part 1 (Amendment),
prepared by Stantec (December 2018).
The result of the analysis is that the Prairie du Chien-Jordan aquifer in the vicinity of the DWSMA has
“moderate” vulnerability. Moderate vulnerability indicates that while protective geologic layers
appear to be present that could offer protection to the aquifers that supply the City’s wells, there is
information to suggest that some younger water is still infiltrating to the aquifers from the land
surface. This was determined by the presence of tritium in City Well No. 2, which is an isotope of
hydrogen that indicates the water was in contact with the atmosphere within the last 60 years. This
determination of moderate vulnerability was used to establish the types of potential contaminant
sources that were tobe inventoried and managed as part of this plan. A more detailed discussion of
potential contamination sources is presented in Chapter 5.
9
193803358
Stantec Consulting Services, Inc.
4.0 DATA ELEMENTS
The State rules relating to wellhead protection require that wellhead protection plans include specific
data elements. Each of these elements was discussed specifically in the second scoping meeting with
the MDH and are presented briefly here.
4.1 Geology
A complete description of geologic conditions in the wellhead protection area is provided in City of
CentervilleWellhead Protection Plan, Part 1(Amendment), prepared by Stantec (December 2018),
which was approved by the MDH in January 2019(4720.5400, subp. 1, item B). See Appendix H.In
general, it was determined that the Prairie du Chien-Jordan aquifer is not hydraulically connected to
nearby surface waters. Confining units are generally limited to areas where the basal layer of the St.
Peter sandstone is presentand/or layers of clay are present. While protective layers of clay are
believed to cover most of the DWSMA and offer some protection from contaminants at the land
surface, a “moderate” vulnerability designation was assigned to the DWSMA to reflect elevated
tritium levels detected in Well 2.
4.2 Groundwater Quality
The quality of water from the City’s wells is generally good.The 2019 Consumer Confidence Report
is provided in Appendix C.
Nitrates levels in the primary municipal wellis typically very low, at or near the detection limit.No
other human-sourced contaminants have beendetected in the City’s wells.
Tritium testing at Well 2 has shown 2.6 tritium units, suggesting that some younger water is entering
the aquifer that supplies this well. This tritium resultwas the reason for assigning a moderate
vulnerability level to the DWSMA.
4.3 Groundwater Quantity
There are a number of wells in surrounding areas which are covered by State groundwater
appropriation permits. The Part1 report (Appendix H) shows nearby wells and their volume pumped
between 2012and 2016. Data indicates there are no known well interference problems in or around
the CentervilleDWSMA. Data showing all well appropriations permits and volumes
pumped can be viewed at the Department of Natural Resources website at
http://www.dnr.state.mn.us/waters/watermgmt_section/appropriations/wateruse.html.
5.0 CONTAMINANT SOURCE INVENTORY
10
193803358
Stantec Consulting Services, Inc.
5.1 Introduction
As partof the City of Centerville’s wellhead protection planning process, an inventory of potential
contaminant sources was conducted within the delineated drinking water supply management area
(DWSMA). The purpose behind this inventory was to develop a database listing potential sources of
contamination that may affect the public water supply wells for the City of Centerville. The results of
this effort provide the City with information about contaminant sources identified in theDWSMA.
Wellhead protection planning strategies can be directed in a manner that will deal with any potential
sites before they become a problem or a threat to Centerville’sdrinking water supply.
5.2 Land Use
Following ascoping meeting held with Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) staff in April 2019,
the Cityproceeded to locate informationabout land and water use within the delineated 10-year
DWSMA for Centerville’s wells. Any data which was relevant to the City’s wells, the quality of the
water being drawn into the wells, or land and groundwater uses around the wells was considered
important in determining any potential threat to the water supply. The following criteria were used:
1. All areas must be inventoried as to the types of land and water uses, as discussed below.
2. All areas within the DWSMA delineation require an inventory of wells or other borings or
excavations that penetrate bedrock-confining units.
3. All areas must be evaluated for the presence of storage tanks, including tanks containing
fuels, solvents, or other chemicals.
4. Known spill and leak sites will be inventoried within the DWSMA.While this isn’t
required in the Scoping Decision Notice, this was included in the plan to give a good
understanding of where spills have occurred in the past and to determine if certain
properties may pose a continuedrisk of contamination.
Each of these elements is described separately below.
5.3 Parcel-Specific Land and Water Uses
Understanding land use is important in determining key areas for concern in managing a wellhead
protection area. For example, knowledge about the location of future commercial development in
relation to the DWSMA may reveal a need to closely manage the activity within more sensitive areas.
Additionally, any parcels that currently pose a potential threat to the City’s water supply need to be
highlighted to increase awareness of any concerns.
Current and future planned land uses for Centerville, Lino Lakes, and Hugo are shown in Appendix B,
based on the respective comprehensive plans forthose cities.A large percentageof the parcels in
Centerville’sDWSMA are shown to beresidential ranging from higher density residential to single
familyresidential. A mix of commercial, public/institutional, and industrialis also present in smaller
percentagesin the Centervilleand Hugo portions of the DWSMA. The portion of the DWSMA in
Lino Lakes has a larger percentage of commercial and industrial land uses planned, particularly along
the I-35 corridor. Commercialor industrialland uses have the greatest potential to contain point
11
193803358
Stantec Consulting Services, Inc.
sources of contamination (storage tanks, hazardous waste generators) while residential land uses have
a greater potential for non-point source pollution from lawn and garden applications.
Land uses are unlikely to changesignificantly over the 10-year lifetime of this plan, since large
portions of theDWSMA arealready fully developed, with the exception of areas along the I-35
corridor which are identified as experiencing expansion or commercial and industrial land uses by
2040. Careful cooperation with neighboring communitieswill be important to ensure that these
planned uses do not have an impact on the aquifer(s) serving municipal wells for Centerville, Lino
Lakes, and Hugo.
5.4 Wells
An important component of the potential contaminant source inventory was the location of any known
wells within the DWSMA. Since wells may penetrate confining layers that normally protect an
aquifer, they are potential pathways for contaminants to rapidly enter the aquifer. A search for active
and unsealedwells was undertaken for the entire DWSMA.
The following sources were used to identify wells in the DWSMA:
1. Minnesota Geological Survey’s County Well Index (CWI)
2. Personal interviews with City staff
3. Site reconnaissance
4. Aerial photos
In general, information from the CWI and the City of Centervillewas used to identify known wells,
while the information from the MDH was used to document abandoned or sealed wells. City staff and
site reconnaissancewas useful in identifying locations for the identified wells.
The results of the well search indicated that there are 202 known wells currently in the DWSMA for
the City of Centervilleincluding the municipal supply wells. A listing of these wells is provided in
Table A-1 in Appendix A and their mappedlocations are depicted in Figures 2A and 2B.More wells
are likely to exist within the DWSMA, but haven’t been identified due to the incomplete nature of the
available databases. Management strategies willbe implemented as part of this plan to help obtain
more information about the actual number and status of wells within the DWSMA.
Another type of well that is inventoried as part of the Wellhead Protection Plan is Class V injection
wells. These wells include shallow disposal wells and automotive drains that are not connected to
municipal sewer service. At present, no knownClass V injection wells were found within the
DWSMA, but the lack of a comprehensive database for these wells makes them difficult to verify.
5.5 Point Sources
An important component of the potential contaminant source inventory was to look for any point
sources within the DWSMA that might be a threat to the quality of Centerville’swater supply. For a
12
193803358
Stantec Consulting Services, Inc.
moderately vulnerable DWSMA, the main point sources of concern are storage tanks. Tanks are a
potential threat because they may contain a high volume of contaminants at one location, but may also
contain certain compounds (such as petroleum products) which can break down protective geologic
layers if leaks are allowed to go unchecked for an extended period of time.
The City investigateddatabases containing information about registered storage tanks, including both
above ground and underground tanks. Once this information was collected, it was reviewed for
accuracy and was also reviewed with City staff in order to identify sites that are currently withinthe
delineated DWSMA.Figure 5 shows the mapped storage tanks, while Tables A-3 in Appendix A
contain information about thesemappedsites. A total of nine storage tank sites were identified during
this planning effort, containing a total of 28registered storage tanks. The majority of these tanks
contain petroleum products, including gasoline, diesel,and fuel oil. Management strategies will be
implemented to raise awareness of best management practices among tank owners in the DWSMA, to
ensure that steps are being taken to reduce the risks for spills or leaks from these tanks.
5.6 Public Utility Services
Another potential source for contaminants within the DWSMA is from infrastructure-related failures.
In moderately vulnerable areas, storm sewers and sanitary sewers are mapped, particularly where they
intersect the 1-year capture zone of the City’s wells, also known as the Emergency Response Area.
Figure 4 shows a layout of the storm and sanitary sewers line operated and maintained by the City of
Centerville.Sanitary sewers for Lino Lakes and Hugo are displayed in Appendix B.
Public water supplywells are also components of the public utility infrastructure. The locations of the
Centervillemunicipal wells are shown on Figure 1. The City of Hugo Wells 3 and 4 are located in the
western portions of the Centerville DWSMA. Table A-1 in Appendix A lists all wells located within
the groundwater portion of the DWSMA. Well locationsare shown in Figures 2A and 2B.
5.7 Former and Active Sites of Contamination
Figure 3 contains an inventory of mapped spill and contaminationsites, with Table A-1 in Appendix
A summarizing each of these sites. This inventory isnot required by the MDH for moderately
vulnerable DWSMAs, but is being included for informational purposes as it provides information
about what sites have posed threats to the aquifer in the past. Additionally, these sites are mapped in
case thehave any residual contamination that is capable to migrating to the bedrock aquifer.A total of
20 sites were inventoried in the DWSMA, with all sites now being listed as “closed” by the MPCA,
meaning they are no longer being actively investigated, remediated, or monitored.
Should any new contamination sites be identified within the DWSMA, they will be prioritized in order
of the threat they pose to the City’s municipal wells. Site specific soil conditions, geology, surface
runoff, and estimated time of travel to the City’s wells will be investigatedto assess the level of threat
to the City’s water supply.
13
193803358
Stantec Consulting Services, Inc.
5.8 Summary
The following table summarizes the number of identified sites for the Centerville potential
contaminant source inventory.The Emergency Response Area is the one-year groundwater capture
zone for the City’s primary municipal well.
Potential Contamination SourceNumber of Sites in Number of Sites in
DWSMAEmergency Response Area
Groundwater Wells*20221
Class V Wells00
Registered Storage Tank Sites92
Documented Spill or Leak Sites204
*includes municipalwells
14
193803358
Stantec Consulting Services, Inc.
6.0 PROJECTED CHANGES TO THE ENVIRONMENT, LAND USE, AND
SURFACE AND GROUNDWATER
6.1 Changes to the Environment and Land Use
Appendix B contains land use maps showing both current and future land uses. The large percentage
of the DWSMA for Centerville covers areas that are already developed and don’t expect to see major
development over the coming ten years, other than continued growth of residential areas.Expansion
in commercial or industrial areas may produce additional potential contaminant sources within the
DWSMA, depending on the nature of businesses that may develop within these zones areas.
The DWSMA overlaps into the cities of Lino Lakes and Hugo.Expansion of commercial and
industrial land uses in the Lino Lakesposes the most significant potential land use changes that could
impact the aquifer serving Centerville’s wells. Since Lino Lake and Hugo also utilize the same
aquifer, cooperative efforts to protect the aquifer will be important.
6.2 Changes to Surface and Groundwater
It is expected that thecurrent water supply system for the City of Centervillewill remain sufficient for
the next ten years. Noadditional water supply wells are planned for the coming decade.It is not
currently anticipated that Lino Lakes or Hugo will add any new municipal wells within the Centerville
DWSMA, but this could change depending on growth in water demands. Any proposed new water
supply wells (or changes to current wells) will need to be reviewed by both the MDH and the
Minnesota Department of Natural Resources to make sure no negative impacts are created by the
planned wells.
15
193803358
Stantec Consulting Services, Inc.
7.0 PROBLEMS AND OPPORTUNITIES
7.1 Problems
1. The DWSMA for Centerville’swells is moderately vulnerable to contamination. This
conclusion was established by water chemistry, age dating techniques indicating “young”
water, and the geologic sensitivity.
2. Portions of the DWSMA include areas of commercial and industrial activity, some of which
represent potentialpoint sources of contaminants.
3. The total number and location of wells in the DWSMA is not known with a high degree of
certainty..
5. There is no accurate inventory or database for Class V wells, so it is unknown how many
Class Vwells may exist within the DWSMA.
6. A portion of the DWSMA isoutside of the city limits of Centerville, making management of
thisareas nearly impossibleto accomplish without cooperation from other local units of
government.
7. Existing leak sites within the DWSMA create uncertainty for the potential of contamination to
later affect the City’s wells.
7.2 Opportunities
1. Since the DWSMA extends beyond Centerville’sborders, an opportunity exists to work with
other communities in planning land uses in order to protect the area’s groundwater resources.
2. Anoka County and Washington County offerassistance in managing wellhead protection
areas. This assistance includes grant funding and financial aid to seal unused wells located in
wellhead protectionareas.
3. Commercialand industrial zoned areaswithin the DWSMAare still in the process of being
developed. Careful planning before development occurs can help reduce the risk of impacts to
groundwater.
4.Despite the vulnerable setting, the water quality of groundwater historically pumped is very
good. Maintaining existing groundwater quality is easierthan repairingalready-contaminated
groundwater resources.
5. Limiting the installation of new wells, along with sealing of unused wells, in areas covered by
the DWSMA delineation would reduce potential pathways for contamination to reach the
aquifers.
16
193803358
Stantec Consulting Services, Inc.
7.3 Status ofExisting Governmental Controls Concerning Water and Related Land Use
There are many tools available to the regulating agencies that may be used to achieve the wellhead
protection planning goals identified by the wellhead planning team. State and local governmental
units, such as MDH, Anoka County, and the DNR, regulate:
Well construction –MDH
Well sealing –MDH
State groundwater appropriation permits – DNR
Public water supply quality – MDH
Setbacks for specific contaminant sources from a well –MDH and local governments
through conditional use permitting
Land use controls – Local governments(City of Centerville, City of Lino Lakes, City
of Hugo), Met Council
Tank control program –MPCA, MDA(Minnesota Department of Agriculture)
Shallow disposal wells - U.S. EPA
Stormwater Discharge Permitting –MPCA, Watershed Organizations
Storage and use of agricultural chemicals and pesticides – MDA
Any of the permitted activities which have the potential to affect the wellhead protection delineation
and/or the quality or quantity of the City of Centervillewater supply should be reviewed by the
respective county, state, or federal agency before a permit can be approved.
The implementation portion of this plan establishes periodic review of controls over land uses and
zoning within the DWSMA. Possible changes to controls will be considered during the appropriate
stages of plan implementation.
17
193803358
Stantec Consulting Services, Inc.
8.0 WELLHEAD PROTECTION GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND
IMPLEMENTATION PLAN
Goals and objectives have been developed based on the results of the vulnerability analysis, the results
of the potential contaminant source inventory, and local geologic conditions. In general, goals and
objectives are ranked in order of priority.
8.1 Goals
The following goals form the framework within which the information generated during delineation
and source inventory activities is evaluated and upon which the planning activities are based:
1. Continue providing high quality water that meets state and federal drinking water standards.
2. Practice preventionstrategiesfor properties containing potential contaminant sources to avoid
adversely impacting the quality.
3. To work cooperatively with other nearby local units of government including Anoka County,
adjacent communities, and state agencieson regional aquifer protection actions.
4. Build awareness of wellhead protection goals among and disseminate information about
wellhead protection plan implementation to the City’s staff, residents, and business
community.
8.2 Objectives
To meet these goals, the following specific objectives were developed:
1.Make a commitment to manage unused, unsealed wells effectively by making sure they are
sealed properly, as appropriate.
2.Develop and implement an aquifer management plan to monitor known sources of
contamination and to identify new ones.
3.Develop a spill response plan to address large spills within the DWSMA.
4.Educate owners of properties containing potential contaminant sources (storage tanks, etc.) of
the importance of spill preventionand best management practices.
5.Be involved in the development and/or implementation of surface and groundwater planning
activities for Anoka County and adjacent communities to help manage surface water flow and
infiltration issues.
6.Review new and redevelopment plans within the DWMSA for their potential to impact
groundwater quality.
7.Develop specific guidance for city departments to use so that Citystaffcan make informed
day-to-day decisions that may affect the wellhead protection program.
8.Develop public education materials to enlist support of community in groundwater
management goals
9.Collect additional data to better define the age of water in the City’s wells.
10.Request notification from other local units of government for any changes that may affect
the management of the DWSMA.
11.Manage and maintain sanitary sewer and storm water systems with wellhead protection
goals in mind.
18
193803358
Stantec Consulting Services, Inc.
8.3 Implementation Plan
Objective 1:Commitment to manage unused, unsealed wells effectively by making sure they are
sealed properly, as appropriate.
Action 1A: Provide MDHwith a list of unused and unsealed well locations as City
staff discover them.
Who: City of Centervillestaff
Cooperators: MDH,Neighboring Communities, Anoka County
When: Ongoing
Effort: 10hoursannually
How: Prepare written reportfor distributiontoAnoka County, MDH, and
Neighboring Communities.
Status:Not currently implemented.
Action 1B: Make property owners aware of financial and technical resources
available to assist in securing grant funding for properly sealing wells.
Who: City of Centervillestaff
Cooperators:MDH,Anoka County
When: Ongoing
Effort: 20 hours annually
How: Research types of grants and loans available for permanent well sealing
and distribute this information to appropriate well owners.
Status:Not currently implemented.
Action 1C: Attempt to locate wells not currently in the database and obtain
information about the condition and status of thesewells
Who: City of Centervillestaff
Cooperators: MDH, Neighboring communities
When: 2025
Effort: Staff time, consultant fees
How:Survey properties with suspected wells. Obtain locations and wells and
any other relevant information pertaining to wellstatus or condition.
Make property owners aware of best management practices and work
with property owners to seal wells,if necessary.Prioritize wells in the
Emergency Response Area.
Status:Notcurrently implemented.
19
193803358
Stantec Consulting Services, Inc.
Action 1D: Apply for grant funding to locate unsealed wells and hire licensed
drilling firms to seal wells.
Who: City of Centervillestaff
Cooperators: Anoka County, Neighboring Communities
When: 2025
Effort: 20-60 hours, depending on scope of effort and number of wells
identified
How: Conduct survey of DWSMA to determinelocation and number of
unused wells that require sealing. Obtain quotations from local well
contractors and obtain grant money to seal wells. Work with
neighboring communities to seal wells outside of the Centerville
portion of the DWSMA. Assist neighboring communities with sealing
wells in Centerville that may also be included within DWSMAs for
those other communities. Consider a joint grant application to seal
wells that fall in DWSMAs with other communities.
Status: Not currently implemented.
Objective 2: Develop and implement an aquifer management plan, based on the management plans
of relevant state agencies, to monitor known sources of potential pollutants and to
identify new ones.
Action 2A: Reviewknown status ofidentified contaminant sources in DWSMA
and identify any new contaminant sources or spills. Determine if state
agencies have knowledge of new spillsor potential contaminant
sources in the DWSMA.Detemine which contaminant sources and
spills may impact the Prairie du Chien-Jordan aquifers.
Who: City of Centervillestaff
Cooperators: MPCA, MDH, Anoka County
When: 2022, 2027
Effort: 20-30 hours
How: Contact designated Point ofContact staff at MDH, MPCA, and
Department of Agriculture staff acting as a liaison to the wellhead
protection program.Inquire about potential changes known to have
occurred in DWSMA since the last update. Identify which spills have
impacted the Prairie du Chien and Jordan aquifers. Update inventory
accordingly.
Status:Not currently implemented.
20
193803358
Stantec Consulting Services, Inc.
Action 2B: Review setback of potential contamination sources from the Inner
Wellhead Management Zone (200 foot radius) around each municipal
well
Who: City of Centervillestaff
Cooperators: MDH
When: Last updated August 2012. Update inventory again in 2022and 2027.
Effort: 10 hoursfor each update
How: Complete worksheet inventory of potential contamination sources
located within the Inner Wellhead Management Zone.Identify any
needed changes to the Wellhead Protection Implementation Plan based
on results of the updated inventory.
Status: Currently implemented.
Objective 3: Develop a spill response plan to address large spills within the DWSMA.
Action 3A: Develop a spill response plan for City staff to respond to a large spill in
the DWSMA and address potential contamination threats to water
supply system.
Who: City of Centervillestaff
Cooperators: Anoka County, MDH, and Neighboring Communities
When: 2023
Effort: 80-100 hours
How: Work with local emergency management teams to identifythreats to
groundwater resources. Prepare spill response plan to outline
responsibilities and actions required to address potential impact to
water supply system.
Status: Not currently implemented.
Objective 4: Educate owners of properties containing storage tanksof the importance of spill
prevention and best management practices.
Action 4A: Contact relevant property owners and make them aware of their
placement within the City’s wellhead protection area. Educate them on
the importance of keeping up tocode with all federal, state, and local
rules regarding their potential sources of contamination.
Who: City of CentervilleStaff
Cooperators: MPCA, Neighboring Communities
When: 2022, repeat in 2026
Effort: 10 hoursper round
How: Send mailing out to property owners. Provide contact numbers for
appropriate government agencies.
Status: Notcurrently implemented.
21
193803358
Stantec Consulting Services, Inc.
Objective 5: Be involved in the development and/or implementation of groundwater plans for
Anoka County.
Action 5A: Inform appropriate county, neighboring community, and watershedsof
Centerville’swellhead protection efforts and request that they notify
the City of Centervilleof land or water management practices or
modifications that are germane to the effort.
Who: City of Centervillestaff
Cooperators: Anoka County; Washington County,Neighboring Communities, MDH
When: 2021
Effort: 8 hours
How: Send letters to relevant local units ofgovernment requesting input in
planning efforts.
Status: Not currently implemented.
Action 5B: Participate in the development of, or revisions to, the County
groundwaterplan, adjacent community wellhead protection plans, and
watershed management plans to ensure all plans recognize the need for
wellhead protection generally and are aware of Centerville’sDWSMA
and action plans specifically.
Who: City of Centervillestaff
Cooperators: Anoka County, Washington County, Neighboring Communities,
Anoka SWCD, Watershed Districts, and MDH
When: As needed
Effort: As appropriate
How: Review draft plans and attend advisory group meetings, as appropriate.
Status: Not currently implemented.
Objective 6: Review new and redevelopment plans within the DWMSA for their potential to impact
groundwater quality.
Action 6A: Review new development and redevelopment plans.
Who: City of CentervilleStaff
Cooperators: Neighboring Communities, Anoka County, Washington County
When:Ongoing, as needed
Cost: 10-40 hours per year
How:Review wellhead protection considerations of proposed new
development or redevelopment plans submitted to City duringstaff
reviewmeetings.
Status: Ongoing
22
193803358
Stantec Consulting Services, Inc.
Action 6B: Review locationand status of rain gardens within the DWSMA to
determine if they pose a threat to groundwater quality.
Who: City of CentervilleStaff
Cooperators: Watersheds, Neighboring Communities, Anoka County, Washington
County
When: Every two years or as needed
Cost: 10-40 hours per year
How:Review location and status of rain gardens. Determine if they pose a
potential threat to groundwater, based on their design and the
vulnerability of underlying groundwater resources. Seek grant funding
to remove or redesign rain gardens that may pose a threat.
Status: Ongoing
Objective 7: Develop specific guidance for City Departments to use so that City staff can make
informed day-to-day decisions.
Action 7A: Review responsibilities of each department.Determine action triggers
that could affect wellhead protection activities for City of Centerville.
Establish means of educating City staff about wellhead protection
planning and the role they play in ensuring its successful
implementation.
Who: City ofCentervilleStaff
Cooperators: MDH
When: 2022
Effort: 10 to 20 hours
How:Prepare specific guidance for each City department and educateCity
staff about its use.
Status: Currently prepared in outline form as part of this document.
Objective 8: Develop public education materials to enlist support of community in groundwater
management goals.
Action 8A: Use City’s website, brochures,newsletter, and/or social mediato enlist
public support for the Wellhead Protection Plan.
Who: City of Centerville Staff
Cooperators:MDH
When: Annually
Effort: 10-20 hours annually
How:Prepare educational materials for distribution using website, brochures,
newsletters, and consumer confidence reports. Vary educational
methods from year-to-year to ensure that the public is reached through
a variety of communication routes.
Status: Currently implemented.
23
193803358
Stantec Consulting Services, Inc.
Objective 9: Collect additional data to better define the age of water in the City’s wells.
Action 9A: Sample relevant wells for compounds which can better define the age
of water in theCity’swell(s).
Who: MDH
Cooperators: City of CentervilleStaff
When: 2023
Effort: Sampling costs, staff time
How:Request that the MDH collect their standard assessment monitoring
package of waterquality samples from Well 2 by the fifth year of plan
implementation. This samplingincludes tritium, nitrates, ammonia,
sulfate, chloride, and bromide. This sample willhelp determine if the
previous sample result remains consistent. Also consider testing Well 1
to prepare for the possibility of putting this well back into regular
operation.
Status: Not currently implemented.
Action 9B: Examine Well 2 to determine if there is an avenue for younger water to
enter the well.
Who: MDH
Cooperators: City of CentervilleStaff
When: When next well rehabilitation occurs
Effort: Well video inspection fees,staff time.
How: Examine possible avenues for younger water to reach the Prairie du
Chien aquiferthrough Well 2. If Well 2 is rehabilitated over the course
of the next ten years, conduct a video camera survey, lookingfor
possible casingbreaches or leaks that could be allowing younger water
to reach the aquifer. Videoinspections are standard for many well
rehabilitation projects.
Status: Not currently implemented.
24
193803358
Stantec Consulting Services, Inc.
Objective 10: Request notification from other localunits of government for any changes that may
affect the management of the DWSMA.
Action 10A: Contact local units of government within the DWSMA and ask to be
notified regarding changes that may impact the management of the
Wellhead Protection Plan
Who: City of CentervilleStaff
Cooperators: Anoka County, Washington County, Neighboring Communities,
Watershed District
When: 2021, repeat in 2026
Effort: 8 hours, plus additional staff time to review responses (variable
depending on responses)
How: Contact appropriate staff at other local government units to determine
what changes have been made in the DWSMA and how those changes
may impact management of this area. Potential changes may include
new permits, land use changes, new wells, amended wellhead
protection plans, etc.
Status: Not currently implemented.
Objective 11: Manage and maintain sanitary sewer and stormwater systems with wellhead
protection goals in mind.
Action 11A: Replace,repair, or lineany sewer mains, servicelines, or structures
that are observed to be leaking, cracked, or deteriorated within the
Emergency Response Area or the 200-foot Inner Wellhead
Management Zone.
Who: City ofCentervilleStaff
Cooperators: MDH
When: Ongoing, as needed
Effort: Sewer repair or replacement costs
How:If surveys or investigations show that sanitary or storm sewer lines
have significantly deteriorated within highly vulnerable wellhead
protection areas, add sewer repairs or replacements to City’s Capital
Improvement Plan. Highest priority should be given to any deteriorated
sewers observed within the ERA (emergency response area) and the
IMWZ (inner wellhead management zone).
Status: Not formally implemented as part of wellhead protection measures.
25
193803358
Stantec Consulting Services, Inc.
Action 11B: Maintain an inventory of all relevant stormwater structures within the
Emergency Response Area.
Who: City of CentervilleStaff
Cooperators: MDH
When: Initial inventory completed, to be updated when changes are made
Effort: Staff time
How: Inventory relevant stormwater structures within the Emergency
Response Area. If changes are made tothese structures, updated the
PCSI as needed to reflect those changes.
Status: Initial inventory completed.
Action 11C: Promote best management practices for stormwater runoff and
infiltration in the DWSMA
Who: City of CentervilleStaff
Cooperators: MDH,MPCA
When: Ongoing, as needed
Effort:Staff time
How: Use the City’s website and newsletters to promote best management
practices for activities that can influence the quality of stormwater
runoff. BMPs include management of household hazardous wastes,
vehicle washing, storage/transport of hazardous materials, and
application of lawn chemicals. Follow MDH and MPCA guidance for
stormwater infiltration.
Status: Partially implemented on City’s website. To be expanded further.
26
193803358
Stantec Consulting Services, Inc.
9.0 GUIDANCE FOR USE BY CITY OF CENTERVILLESTAFF
WELLHEAD PROTECTION PLANNING
To ensure that wellhead protection planning is viable for the City of Centerville, City staff has to
understand the nature of the City’s programand how their day-to-day actions pertain to the wellhead
protection program
Centerville’sWellhead Protection Manager: Public Works Director (Paul Palzer)
9.1 Activities Affecting Wellhead Protection
The list presented below reflects the type of information or activities that City staff may encounter or
manage as part of their normal functions that should be communicated to the wellhead protection
manager.
Public Safety Department (Fire and Police)
Emergency response and spills
Underground storage tank removal, particularly if contamination is observed
Fire suppression (if techniques may affect water quality)
Observed dumping
Building Inspector
Old storage tanks
Unsealed or abandoned wells
Public Works
Municiapl well siting
Well sampling and analysis results
Contamination noted during construction
Change in pumping of municipal wells
Sanitaryand stormsewer line breaks/ruptures, structural deficiencies
Sanitary sewer lift station overflow/failure
Observed dumping
Parks and Recreation
Observed dumping
Turf management
Planning
Down-zoning or other zoning changes
Unusual infiltration or stormwater issues
Environmental Assessment Worksheets (EAWs)
Installation of high-capacity wells
Special projects
27
193803358
Stantec Consulting Services, Inc.
In addition, several programmatic activities will need on-going review and consideration. These
generally involve fewer departments, and are listed below.
Attorney/Administrator
Review new ordinance development to ensure consistency with wellhead protection plan
Planning
Ordinance review and development of official controls, as necessary
Interaction and liaison with other local units of government
Education activities
Development and implementation of Best Management Practices for land use planning
decisions in wellhead protection areas. (Example: Review proposed land uses to ensure
potential sources of contamination will meet required setback distances from wells.)
Wellhead Protection Manager
Internal coordination and plan management
Interaction with external cooperators
28
193803358
Stantec Consulting Services, Inc.
10.0 PROGRAM EVALUATION
Centervillewill evaluate the progress of the implementation plan every two years. The wellhead
protection plan manager will prepare a short progress report to be completed byDecember 31 of each
even-numbered calendar year, starting in the year 2022. The progress report will briefly discuss the
actions implemented by the City or any cooperators during the previous two years, and actions that
will be completed in the following two years. The progress report willbe distributed to the City
Council for their review after which it will be submitted to MDH.
According to Minnesota wellhead protection rules, this wellhead protection plan will be updated every
10 years from date of adoption or with the installation of any new municipal well to the water supply
system.
29
193803358
Stantec Consulting Services, Inc.
11.0 EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS ANDCONTINGENCY PLAN
The CentervilleWater Supply Plan was submitted to the Department of Natural Resources and was
approved on September 20, 2018. Notice of the plan approval is provided in Appendix D. This plan
fulfills the Wellhead Protection Rule requirements for an emergency preparedness and contingency
plan.
The plan may be reviewed at City Hall in Centerville, MNthrough an appointment with Paul Palzer,
the Public Works Director and Wellhead Protection Manager.
30
193803358
Stantec Consulting Services, Inc.
12.0 LOCAL GOVERNMENT REVIEW AND PUBLIC HEARING
(Note: This section will be completed following the local government review period and public
hearing.)
The draft Centervillewellhead protection plan was submitted to local units of government for their
review and comments on _________________. The required 60-day review period ended on
_______________________.Written comments were received and have been included in Appendix E
of this report.Comments have been considered and, where appropriate, modifications weremade to
Wellhead Protection Plan to address those comments.
A public hearing was held the evening of ____________ at the CentervilleCity Hall as part of the
regular City Council meeting. At the hearing, the following comments were received:
______________________________________________________________________________.
Documentation for the public hearing is provided in Appendix G.
31
193803358
Stantec Consulting Services, Inc.
GJHVSFT
42
2:4914469
Tuboufd!Dpotvmujoh!Tfswjdft-!Jod/
W;\]2:49\]bdujwf\]2:4914469\]HJT\]Qspkfdut\]Qu3!Gjh3B!Xftufso!Xfmmt/nye 723/823/3111
Njoofbqpmjt-!NO!66513
844!Nbsrvfuuf!Bwf/-!Tvjuf!2111
up!uif!vtf!pg!tvdi!jogpsnbujpo/
Tuboufd!Dpotvmujoh!Tfswjdft
bt!up!bddvsbdz-!dpnqmfufoftt-ujnfmjoftt-!ps!sjhiut!
op!sfqsftfoubujpot!ps!xbssboujft-!fyqsftt!ps!jnqmjfe-!
tvckfdu!up!dibohf!xjuipvu!opujdf/!Tuboufd!nblft!
XFTUFSO!XFMMT.3BGJHVSF
cz!Tuboufd!tubgg!gspn!b!wbsjfuz!pg!tpvsdft!boe!jt!
Uif!jogpsnbujpo!po!uijt!nbq!ibt!cffo!dpnqjmfe!
W;\]2:49\]bdujwf\]2:4914469\]HJT\]Qspkfdut\]Qu3!Gjh3!Fbtufso!Xfmmt/nye 31723/823/3111
Njoofbqpmjt-!NO!66513
844!Nbsrvfuuf!Bwf/-!Tvjuf!2111
up!uif!vtf!pg!tvdi!jogpsnbujpo/
Tuboufd!Dpotvmujoh!Tfswjdft
bt!up!bddvsbdz-!dpnqmfufoftt-ujnfmjoftt-!ps!sjhiut!
op!sfqsftfoubujpot!ps!xbssboujft-!fyqsftt!ps!jnqmjfe-!
tvckfdu!up!dibohf!xjuipvu!opujdf/!Tuboufd!nblft!
FBTUFSO!XFMM.3GJHVSF
cz!Tuboufd!tubgg!gspn!b!wbsjfuz!pg!tpvsdft!boe!jt!
Uif!jogpsnbujpo!po!uijt!nbq!ibt!cffo!dpnqjmfe!
BQQFOEJY!B
XFMMT!BOE!QPUFOUJBM!DPOUBNJOBOU
TPVSDF!JOWFOUPSZ
43
2:4914469
Tuboufd!Dpotvmujoh!Tfswjdft-!Jod/
BQQFOEJY!C
MBOE!VTF!NBQT
44
2:4914469
Tuboufd!Dpotvmujoh!Tfswjdft-!Jod/
E
T
E35E
T
A
T
S
R
E
T
N
I
MN
ADREKA
L
I
NR
E
T
ST
TO
TO
E
T
RLAKESERVICER
OTTE
A
T
S
R
E
T
NI
B
N
E53ETATAM
SRETI
NIBSOTSN
SBI
S
21
S12
EVA T
E
V
A
H
T
0
2
EVA YTINU
DE
E
RP
ESAVE
AK
W
N
TTO
CO
T
C CAMUS
DN
A
I
DAHS
EVA
I
TC YV
T
LRN
O
SPETER
UL
HO
RIC KA
O
DR LLIM
R
PHEAS
T
C
W
O
D
A
E
M
C
Y
A
W
RP
DR SSERGO
R
I
C
L
D
I
NL
DR NOFFIOG
Y
A
W
D
N
BO
EAVERP
Y
E
R
P
S
O
T
C
D
N
UL
O
M
L
R
G
D
!
GFFU
2-111
U
D
D
R
611
U
D
D
R
1
K
A
Established 1857
L
W
O
D
A
H
K
A
MBOE!VTF L
W
VTF!QMBO
O
enterville
D
NBQ!2.3
A
H
HFOFSBMJ\[FE!
3141
GVUVSF!MBOE!
T
3
S
E35E
T
A
TN
SI
R
E
TA
N
I
M
O
T
M
A
INE
TDREKA
L
S5
R
TNE
I
TT
T3
O
O
NB
T
T
RLAKESERVICER
SOTTE
A
T
S
N
I
A
O
E
53ETATSAM
RETI
NIBSOTSN
E
T
S
NBI
S
21
A TS12
EV
E
V
A
H
T
0
2
VA YTINU
E
D
EE
R
AKESAVE
O
NW
TO
OT
C
Y
A
NW
T
C CAMUS
DN
R
A
HS
EVA DA
TC YVI
RT
L
O
SPETER
L
HOU
RIC KAO
DR LLIM
D
R
HE
ASA
T
C
W
O
D
B
I
C
R
C
E
D
RGORP
DR SSE
GDI
E
L
N
OG
DR NOFFI
Y
A
N
BO
EAVERP
C
RI
R
D
E
L
L
A
YE
VRP
S
O
A
L
T
C
D
N
L
U
O
M
L
R
G
D
!
!
GFFU
2-111
611
U
K
R
1
Established 1857
VTF!QMBO
enterville
NBQ!4.2
VTF!QMBO
T
S
A
E
3141
GVUVSF!MBOE!
3141
GVUVSF!MBOE!
T
3
S
E35E
T
A
TN
SI
R
E
TA
N
I
M
O
T
M
A
INE
TDREKA
L
S5
R
TNE
I
TT
T3
O
O
NB
T
T
RLAKESERVICER
SOTTE
A
T
S
N
I
A
O
E
53ETATSAM
RETI
NIBSOTSN
E
T
S
NBI
S
21
A TS12
EV
E
V
A
H
T
0
2
VA YTINU
E
D
EE
R
AKESAVE
O
NW
TO
OT
C
Y
A
NW
T
C CAMUS
DN
R
A
HS
EVA DA
TC YVI
RT
L
O
SPETER
L
HOU
RIC KAO
DR LLIM
D
R
HE
ASA
T
C
W
O
D
B
I
C
R
C
E
D
RGORP
DR SSE
GDI
E
L
N
OG
DR NOFFI
Y
A
N
BO
EAVERP
C
RI
R
D
E
L
L
A
YE
VRP
S
O
A
L
T
C
D
N
L
U
O
M
L
R
G
D
!
GFFU
2-111
611
U
R
1
Established 1857
enterville
NBQ!4.3
VTF!QMBO
T
S
A
E
3151
GVUVSF!MBOE!
T
3
S
E35E
T
A
TN
SI
R
E
TA
N
I
M
O
T
M
A
INE
TDREKA
L
S5
R
TNE
I
TT
T3
O
O
NB
T
T
RLAKESERVICER
SOTTE
A
T
S
N
I
A
O
E
53ETATSAM
RETI
NIBSOTSN
E
T
S
NBI
S
21
A TS12
EV
E
V
A
H
T
0
2
VA YTINU
E
D
EE
R
AKESAVE
O
NW
TO
OT
C
Y
A
NW
T
C CAMUS
DN
R
A
HS
EVA DA
TC YVI
RT
L
O
SPETER
L
HOU
RIC KAO
DR LLIM
D
R
HE
ASA
T
C
W
O
D
B
I
C
R
C
E
D
RGORP
DR SSE
GDI
E
L
N
OG
DR NOFFI
Y
A
N
BO
EAVERP
C
RI
R
D
E
L
L
A
YE
VRP
S
O
A
L
T
C
D
N
L
U
O
M
L
R
G
D
GFFU
2-111
611
U
K
R
1
Established 1857
BSFBT!
enterville
NBQ!4.4
T
S
A
E
EFWFMPQNFOU
JEFOUJGJFE!GPS!
2-17
for review only
DRAFT Nov25-19
Back to Text: Page 2-15
2017 Existing Land Use
.
Figure 2-17
City of Hugo
evA
S evA ht02
ht02
e
vA ht02
dR
etneC
ellivr
E
r
D
e
k
a
L
u
a
e
d
n
o
R
tS
niaM
W
dR
e
ka
L
u
ae
dn
oR
rD ylloH
N
r
D
e
k
a
L
ev
A h
t4
d
R
n
o
s
g
d
o
H
evA tesnuS
City of Circle Pines
City of Blaine
3-5
for review only
DRAFT Nov25-19
Back to Text: Page 3-4Back to Text: Page 9-1
Full Build Land Use
.
Figure 3-1
Djuz!pg!Ivhp
T!fwB!iu13
fwB!iu13
fwB!iu13
S
e
uofD
fmmjwsf
F
!
s
E
!
f
l
b
M
v
b
f
e
o
p
S
uT
!ojbN
X!
eS
!f
lb
M
v
bf
eo
pS
sE!zmmpI
fw
B!
iu5
e
S
o
p
t
h
e
p
I
fwB!uftovT
Djuz!pg!Cmbjof
3-6
for review only
DRAFT Nov25-19
Back to Text: Page 3-4Back to Text: Page 9-1
2040 Future Land Use
.
Figure 3-2
Djuz!pg!Ivhp
fwB
iu13T!fwB!iu13
fw
B!iu13
eS
wsfuofD
fmmj
F
!
s
E
!
f
l
b
M
v
b
f
e
o
p
S
uT
ojb
N
X!
eS!
fl
bM
vb
fe
op
S
I
sE!zmmp
f
wB
!i
u5
e
S
o
p
t
h
e
p
I
fwB
!uftovT
Djuz!pg!Djsdmf!Qjoft
Djuz!pg!Cmbjof
7-6
for review only
DRAFT Nov18-19
Figure 7-3 Existing Storm Sewer System
Djuz!pg!Ivhp
B
fw
T!fwB!iu13
iu13
fwB!iu1
3
fD
!fmmjwsfuo
eS
uT
ojbN
X
!e
S!
flb
M
vb
fe
op
S
pI
sE!zmm
f
wB!
iu
5
2
3
-
2
2
-
0
1
D
C
A
fwB
Djuz!pg!Djsdmf!Qjoft
ufto
vT
Djuz!pg!Cmbjof
8-3
Existing Sanitary Sewer System
.
Figure 8-1
Djuz!pg!Ivhp
"""
"
"
""""
"
"
"
""
"
"
"
"
"""""
fwB
"
iu13
T!fwB!
u13
i
""
"
f
wB!iu13
wsfuofD
eS!fmmj
"
""
"""
"
"
"
"
"
uT
o
jbN
"
"
"
"""""
X!
eS
!f
lb
M
"
v
bf
eo
pS
"
"
""
"
""
"
"
"
sE!zmmpI
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
""
"
""""
"
"
"""""
""
""""""
"""""""
"""
f"""
wB!
iu"""
5"
""
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
e
S
""""
""
o
p
t"
h
e
"""p
I
""
"
"
"
"
"
"""
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"""
"
"
"
""
"
""
"""
""
"""
"
"
"
"
"
""
""""
fwB""
""
Djuz!pg!Djsdmf!Qjoft
uftovT
Djuz!pg!Cmbjof
9-3
Back to Text: Page 9-20
Figure 9-1: Existing Water System
Djuz!pg!Ivhp
fwB
iu13
T!fwB!
u13
i
f
wB!iu13
wsfuofD
eS!fmmj
uT
o
jbN
X!
eS
!f
lb
M
v
bf
eo
pS
sE!zmmpI
f
wB!
iu
5
e
S
o
p
t
h
e
p
I
fwB
Djuz!pg!Djsdmf!Qjoft
uftovT
Djuz!pg!Cmbjof
9-14
Figure 9-7: Drinking Water Supply Management Area (DWSMA)
Djuz!pg!Ivhp
T!fwB
fwB
iu13
iu13
fwB
iu13
wsfuofD
eS!fmmj
uT!ojb
N
X!
eS!
fl
bM
vb
fe
op
S
mmpI
sE!z
fw
B!
iu
5
e
S
o
p
t
h
e
p
I
fwB!uftov
T
tfojQ!fmdsjD!gp!zujD
Djuz!pg!Cmbjof
33
COMMUNITY BACKGROUND
Figure 2-16
The inventory can
ownship, on the south
.
T
, Hugo is bounded on
y
ownship, and on the west by the City of
T
Mboe!Vtf
2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE
This inventory, combined with other background information,
.
Metropolitan Urban Service Area Located in northwestern Washington Countthe north by Forest Lake, on the east by May by Grant and White Bear Lino Lakes. Hugo is part of the seven-county
metropolitan region. The total area of the City is approximately 36 square miles and the Metropolitan Urban Service Area (MUSA) on the western portion of the City currently has 10,171
acres. This designation allows development of land to occur at urban densities with municipal sewer and water facilities.Existing Land Use The Metropolitan Council provides an inventory
of land uses for each City, as shown in Figure 2-16. The land use inventory is used to quantify development patterns, densities and other land use scenarios that can provide direction
for future development and redevelopment in the Cityis used to suggest where and at what intensityalso help classify areas that should remain undeveloped or preserved based on the presence
of wetlands, lakes, or the underlying conservation system. All of this information provides a baseline that the City can utilize when making land use and development decisions. This
information will also be used to help develop the future land use component of the Comprehensive Plan.
Map 2-6
O
!
E
S
!
I
D
O
Z
M
Lfztupof
z
s
s
f
L
sfmmfL
zmvK
zepK
zfsggfK
psfobK
o
mfup
Jt
f
s
u
T
itjsJ
eppxoJ
mmptsfhoJ
t
fjmmJ
f
e
z
I
Ipnftufbe
pmjI
Ifoob
s
f
i
u
b
f
I
xpssbI
sfiub
f
Isfq
qV
foputzfsH
i
u
6
ffsH
fo
lpps
cofm
H
xfjwep
pH
f
bw
x
fjwep
p
H
s
e
f
io
f
bm
u
bd
tfdobsG
ou
b
v
o
j
z
b
foeo
m
o
j
u
t
embsfh{ujGfz
s
p
Gb
m
G
fmbojG
bsbss
fG
n
ep
s
n
i
d
o
iosbGf
s
z
G
b
pGo
p
d
m
b
x
G
b
lo
f
o
Pf
b
G
i
q
u
o
l
pb
js
b
G
opus
dfwF
F
ev
j
s
Q
I
j
m
m
m
s
f
obiuF
eI
m
f
f
u
u
H
pt
D
o
f
s
h
p
utfsdnmvs
F
F6
4!F
UBU
TS
FU
OJ
Map 2-5
O
!
E
S
!
I
D
O
Z
M
Lfztupof
z
s
s
f
L
sfmmfL
zmvK
zepK
zfsggfK
psfobK
o
mfup
Jt
f
s
u
T
itjsJ
eppxoJ
mmptsfhoJ
t
fjmmJ
f
e
z
I
Ipnftufbe
pmjI
Ifoob
s
f
i
u
b
f
I
xpssbI
sfiub
f
Isfq
qV
foputzfsH
i
u
6
ffsH
fo
lpps
cofm
H
xfjwep
pH
f
bw
x
fjwep
p
H
s
e
f
io
f
bm
u
bd
tfdobsG
ou
b
v
o
j
z
b
foeo
m
o
j
u
t
embsfh{ujGfz
s
p
Gb
m
G
fmbojG
bsbss
fG
n
ep
s
n
i
d
o
iosbGf
s
z
G
b
pGo
p
d
m
b
x
G
b
lo
f
o
Pf
b
G
i
q
u
o
l
pb
js
b
G
opus
dfwF
F
ev
j
s
Q
I
j
m
m
m
s
f
obiuF
eI
m
f
f
u
u
H
pt
D
o
f
s
h
p
utfsdnmvs
F
F6
4!F
UBU
TS
FU
OJ
Map 3-1
O
!
E
S
!
I
D
O
Z
M
Lfztupof
z
s
s
f
L
sfmmfL
zmvK
zepK
zfsggfK
psfobK
o
mfup
Jt
f
s
u
T
itjsJ
eppxoJ
mmptsfhoJ
t
fjmmJ
f
e
z
I
Ipnftufbe
pmjI
Ifoob
s
f
i
u
b
f
I
xpssbI
sfiub
f
Isfq
qV
foputzfsH
i
u
6
ffsH
fo
lpps
cofm
H
xfjwep
pH
f
bw
x
fjwep
p
H
s
e
f
io
f
bm
u
bd
tfdobsG
ou
b
v
o
j
z
b
foeo
m
o
j
u
t
embsfh{ujGfz
s
p
Gb
m
G
fmbojG
bsbss
fG
n
ep
s
n
i
d
o
iosbGf
s
z
G
b
pGo
p
d
m
b
x
G
b
lo
f
o
Pf
b
G
i
q
u
o
l
pb
js
b
G
opus
dfwF
F
ev
j
s
Q
I
j
m
m
m
s
f
obiuF
eI
m
f
f
u
u
H
pt
D
o
f
s
h
p
utfsdnmvs
F
F6
4!F
UBU
TS
FU
OJ
Map 9-1
#*
M
z
o
id
!
S
e
O!
O!fw
B!fopu
tzfL
O!fwB!
zfsggfK
O!f
wB!i
tjsJ
Johfstpmm!Bwf!O
O!fwB!ebfutfnpI
O!fwB!pmjI
O!fwB!boofI
O!f
wB!xpssbI
O!fwB!xfjwep
pH
#
*
e
w
m
C
!
u
t
f
s
p
G
#
*
O!fwB!zbxo
fG
O!fwB!bqpsvF
O!fwB!obiuF
Map 11-1
M
z
o
id
!
S
e
O!
O!fw
B!fopu
tzfL
O!fwB!
zfsggfK
O!f
wB!i
tjsJ
Johfstpmm!Bwf!O
O!fwB!ebfutfnpI
O!fwB!pmjI
O!fwB!boofI
O!f
wB!xpssbI
O!fwB!xfjwep
pH
e
w
m
C
!
u
t
f
s
p
G
"
O!fwB!zbxo
fG
O!fwB!bqpsvF
O!fwB!obiuF
"
165th St N
Oneka
Lake
157th St N
*t
ka
e
n
O
Rice
Lake
Egg
Lake
1
140th St N40t
h S
t N
1
37th St N
1
2ndStN
1
30th St N
Sunset
Lake
1
25th St N
Bald
Eagle
Lake
Round
Lake
Very High Vulnerability
0
2thStN
High Vulnerability
Benson
Moderate Vulnerability
Park Pond
7thS
11tN
DWSMA
Mann
City Boundary
Lake
Figure 2 - DWSMA Vulnerability
Wellhead Protection Plan
±
City of Hugo, MN
1 inch = 3,000 feet
BQQFOEJY!D!
DJUZ!PG!DFOUFSWJMMF
DPOTVNFS!DPOGJEFODF!SFQPSU
45
2:4914469
Tuboufd!Dpotvmujoh!Tfswjdft-!Jod/
CONSUMERCONFIDENCEREPORT
Centerville 2019 Drinking Water Report
Making Safe Drinking Water
Your drinking water comes from a groundwater source: a 187-foot-deep well that draws water from the
Prairie Du Chien Group aquifer.
Centerville works hard to provide you with safe and reliable drinking water that meets federal and state
water quality requirements. The purpose of this report is to provide you with information on your drinking
water and how to protect our precious water resources.
Contact Tedd Peterson, Public Works Maintenance Technician, at 651-792-7940 or
tpeterson@centervillemn.com if you have questions about Centerville’s drinking water. You can also ask
for information about how you can take part in decisions that may affect water quality.
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency sets safe drinking water standards. These standards limit the
amounts of specific contaminants allowed in drinking water. This ensures that tap water is safe to drink for
most people. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration regulates the amount of certain contaminants in
bottled water. Bottled water must provide the same public health protection as public tap water.
Drinking water, including bottled water, may reasonably be expected to contain at least small amounts of
some contaminants. The presence of contaminants does not necessarily indicate that water poses a health
risk. More information about contaminants and potential health effects can be obtained by calling the
Environmental Protection Agency’s Safe Drinking Water Hotline at 1-800-426-4791.
Centerville Monitoring Results
This report contains our monitoring results from January 1 to December 31, 2019.
We work with the Minnesota Department of Health to test drinking water for more than 100 contaminants.
It is not unusual to detect contaminants in small amounts. No water supply is ever completely free of
contaminants. Drinking water standards protect Minnesotans from substances that may be harmful to their
health.
Learn more by visiting the Minnesota Department of Health’s webpage Basics of Monitoring and testing of
Drinking Water in Minnesota
(https://www.health.state.mn.us/communities/environment/water/factsheet/sampling.html).
How to Read the Water Quality Data Tables
The tables below show the contaminants we found last year or the most recent time we sampled for that
contaminant. They also show the levels of those contaminants and the Environmental Protection Agency’s
limits. Substances that we tested for but did not find are not included in the tables.
We sample for some contaminants less than once a year because their levels in water are not expected to
change from year to year. If we found any of these contaminants the last time we sampled for them, we
included them in the tables below with the detection date.
We may have done additional monitoring for contaminants that are not included in the Safe Drinking Water
Act. To request a copy of these results, call the Minnesota Department of Health at 651-201-4700 or 1-800-
818-9318 between 8:00 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday.
PUBLICWATERSUPPLYIDENTIFICATION(PWSID):1020036PAGE1
CONSUMERCONFIDENCEREPORT
Definitions
AL (Action Level): The concentration of a contaminant which, if exceeded, triggers treatment or
other requirements which a water system must follow.
EPA:Environmental Protection Agency
MCL (Maximum contaminant level): The highest level of a contaminant that is allowed in
drinking water. MCLs are set as close to the MCLGs as feasible using the best available treatment
technology.
MCLG (Maximum contaminant level goal): The level of a contaminant in drinking water below
which there is no known or expected risk to health. MCLGs allow for a margin of safety.
MRDL (Maximum residual disinfectant level): The highest level of a disinfectant allowed in
drinking water. There is convincing evidence that addition of a disinfectant is necessary for control
of microbial contaminants.
MRDLG (Maximum residual disinfectant level goal): The level of a drinking water disinfectant
below which there is no known or expected risk to health. MRDLGs do not reflect the benefits of the
use of disinfectants to control microbial contaminants.
N/A (Not applicable): Does not apply.
ppb (parts per billion): One part per billion in water is like one drop in one billion drops of water,
or about one drop in a swimming pool. ppb is the same as micrograms per liter (g/l).
ppm (parts per million): One part per million is like one drop in one million drops of water, or
about one cup in a swimming pool. ppm is the same as milligrams per liter (mg/l).
PWSID: Public water system identification.
Monitoring Results – Regulated Substances
LEAD AND COPPER – Tested at customer taps.
Number
EPA’s90% of of
Contaminant(Date, if
EPA’s
IdealResultsHomesTypical
sampled in previous ActionViolation
GoalWere Less with Sources
year)
Level
(MCLG)ThanHigh
Levels
Lead (09/07/17) 0 ppb 90% of 1.2 ppb 0 out of NO Corrosion of
homes 20household
less than plumbing.
15 ppb
0 ppm 90% of 0.65 ppm 0 out of NO Corrosion of
Copper (09/07/17)
homes 20household
less than plumbing.
1.3 ppm
PUBLICWATERSUPPLYIDENTIFICATION(PWSID):1020036PAGE2
CONSUMERCONFIDENCEREPORT
INORGANIC & ORGANIC CONTAMINANTS – Tested in drinking water.
Highest
EPA’sRange of
ContaminantEPA’sAverage or
IdealDetected
(Date, if sampled
LimitHighestViolation Typical Sources
GoalTest
in previous year)(MCL)Single Test
(MCLG)Results
Result
Nitrate10 ppm 10.4 0.37 ppm 0.00 - 0.37 NO Runoff from
ppmppmfertilizer use;
Leaching from
septic tanks,
sewage; Erosion
of natural
deposits.
CONTAMINANTS RELATED TO DISINFECTION – Tested in drinking water.
Highest
EPA’sEPA’sRange of
Substance(Date, if
Average or
Ideal Goal LimitDetectedTypical
sampled in previous HighestViolation
(MCLG or (MCL or TestSources
year)
Single Test
MRDLG)MRDL)
Results
Result
N/A 80 ppb 9.4 ppb N/A NO By-product of
Total
Trihalomethanesdrinking water
disinfection.
(TTHMs)
4.0 ppm 4.0 ppm 0.23 ppm 0.12 - 0.31 NO Water additive
Total Chlorine
ppmused to
control
microbes.
OTHER SUBSTANCES – Tested in drinking water.
Highest
SubstanceRange of
EPA’sEPA’sAverage or
(Date, if Detected
Ideal Goal LimitHighestViolation Typical Sources
sampled in
Test
(MCLG)(MCL)
Single Test
previous year)Results
Result
4.0 ppm 4.0 ppm 0.86 ppm 0.76 - 0.84 NO Erosion of
Fluoride
ppmnatural deposits;
Water additive
to promote
strong teeth.
Potential Health Effects and Corrective Actions (If Applicable)
PUBLICWATERSUPPLYIDENTIFICATION(PWSID):1020036PAGE3
CONSUMERCONFIDENCEREPORT
Fluoride: Fluoride is nature's cavity fighter, with small amounts present naturally in many
drinking water sources. There is an overwhelming weight of credible, peer-reviewed, scientific
evidence that fluoridation reduces tooth decay and cavities in children and adults, even when
there is availability of fluoride from other sources, such as fluoride toothpaste and mouth
rinses. Since studies show that optimal fluoride levels in drinking water benefit public health,
municipal community water systems adjust the level of fluoride in the water to a concentration
between 0.5 to 1.5 parts per million (ppm), with an optimal fluoridation goal between 0.7 and
1.2 ppm to protect your teeth. Fluoride levels below 2.0 ppm are not expected to increase the
risk of a cosmetic condition known as enamel fluorosis.
PUBLICWATERSUPPLYIDENTIFICATION(PWSID):1020036PAGE4
CONSUMERCONFIDENCEREPORT
Monitoring Results – Unregulated Substances
In addition to testing drinking water for contaminants regulated under the Safe Drinking Water Act, we
sometimes also monitor for contaminants that are not regulated. Unregulated contaminants do not have
legal limits for drinking water.
Detection alone of a regulated or unregulated contaminant should not cause concern. The meaning of a
detection should be determined considering current health effects information. We are often still learning
about the health effects, so this information can change over time.
The following table shows the unregulated contaminants we detected last year, as well as human-health
based guidance values for comparison, where available. The comparison values are based only on
potential health impacts and do not consider our ability to measure contaminants at very low
concentrations or the cost and technology of prevention and/or treatment. They may be set at levels that
are costly, challenging, or impossible for water systems to meet (for example, large-scale treatment
technology may not exist for a given contaminant).
A person drinking water with a contaminant at or below the comparison value would be at little or no risk
for harmful health effects. If the level of a contaminant is above the comparison value, people of a certain
age or with special health conditions - like a fetus, infants, children, elderly, and people with impaired
immunity – may need to take extra precautions. Because these contaminants are unregulated, EPA and
MDH require no particular action based on detection of an unregulated contaminant. We are notifying
you of the unregulated contaminants we have detected as a public education opportunity.
More information is available on MDH’s A-Z List of Contaminants in Water
(https://www.health.state.mn.us/communities/environment/water/contaminants/index.html) and
FourthUnregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule (UCMR 4)
(https://www.health.state.mn.us/communities/environment/water/com/ucmr4.html).
UNREGULATED CONTAMINANTS – Tested in drinking water.
Highest Average
Range of Detected
ContaminantComparison Value Result or Highest
Test Results
Single Test Result
Sodium*20 ppm 4.04 ppm N/A
Sulfate 500 ppm 8.75 ppm N/A
*Note that home water softening can increase the level of sodium in your water.
Some People Are More Vulnerable to Contaminants in Drinking Water
Some people may be more vulnerable to contaminants in drinking water than the general population.
Immuno-compromised persons such as persons with cancer undergoing chemotherapy, persons who have
undergone organ transplants, people with HIV/AIDS or other immune system disorders, some elderly, and
infants can be particularly at risk from infections. The developing fetus and therefore pregnant women may
also be more vulnerable to contaminants in drinking water. These people or their caregivers should seek
advice about drinking water from their health care providers. EPA/Centers for Disease Control (CDC)
guidelines on appropriate means to lessen the risk of infection by Cryptosporidium and other microbial
contaminants are available from the Safe Drinking Water Hotline at 1-800-426-4791.
PUBLICWATERSUPPLYIDENTIFICATION(PWSID):1020036PAGE5
CONSUMERCONFIDENCEREPORT
Learn More about Your Drinking Water
Drinking Water Sources
Minnesota’s primary drinking water sources are groundwater and surface water. Groundwater is the water
found in aquifers beneath the surface of the land. Groundwater supplies 75 percent of Minnesota’s drinking
water. Surface water is the water in lakes, rivers, and streams above the surface of the land. Surface water
supplies 25 percent of Minnesota’s drinking water.
Contaminants can get in drinking water sources from the natural environment and from people’s daily
activities. There are five main types of contaminants in drinking water sources.
Microbial contaminants, such as viruses, bacteria, and parasites. Sources include sewage treatment
plants, septic systems, agricultural livestock operations, pets, and wildlife.
Inorganic contaminants include salts and metals from natural sources (e.g. rock and soil), oil and gas
production, mining and farming operations, urban stormwater runoff, and wastewater discharges.
Pesticides and herbicides are chemicals used to reduce or kill unwanted plants and pests. Sources
include agriculture, urban stormwater runoff, and commercial and residential properties.
Organic chemical contaminants include synthetic and volatile organic compounds. Sources include
industrial processes and petroleum production, gas stations, urban stormwater runoff, and septic
systems.
Radioactive contaminants such as radium, thorium, and uranium isotopes come fromnatural sources
(e.g. radon gas from soils and rock), mining operations, and oil and gas production.
The Minnesota Department of Health provides information about your drinking water source(s) in a source
water assessment, including:
How Centerville is protecting your drinking water source(s);
Nearby threats to your drinking water sources;
How easily water and pollution can move from the surface of the land into drinking water sources,
based on natural geology and the way wells are constructed.
Find your source water assessment at Source Water Assessments
(https://www.health.state.mn.us/communities/environment/water/swp/swa) or call 651-201-4700 or 1-800-
818-9318 between 8:00 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday.
Lead in Drinking Water
You may be in contact with lead through paint, water, dust, soil, food, hobbies, or your job. Coming in
contact with lead can cause serious health problems for everyone. There is no safe level of lead. Babies,
children under six years, and pregnant women are at the highest risk.
Lead is rarely in a drinking water source, but it can get in your drinking water as it passes through lead
service lines and your household plumbing system. Centerville is responsible for providing high quality
drinking water, but it cannot control the plumbing materials used in private buildings.
Read below to learn how you can protect yourself from lead in drinking water.
1.Let the water run for 30-60 seconds before using it for drinking or cooking if the water has not been
turned on in over six hours. If you have a lead service line, you may need to let the water run longer. A
service line is the underground pipe that brings water from the main water pipe under the street to your
home.
PUBLICWATERSUPPLYIDENTIFICATION(PWSID):1020036PAGE6
CONSUMERCONFIDENCEREPORT
You can find out if you have a lead service line by contacting your public water system, or you can
check by following the steps at: https://www.mprnews.org/story/2016/06/24/npr-find-lead-pipes-
in-your-home
The only way to know if lead has been reduced by letting it run is to check with a test. If letting the
water run does not reduce lead, consider other options to reduce your exposure.
2.Use cold water for drinking, making food, and making baby formula. Hot water releases more lead
from pipes than cold water.
3.Test your water. In most cases, letting the water run and using cold water for drinking and cooking
should keep lead levels low in your drinking water. If you are still concerned about lead, arrange with a
laboratory to test your tap water. Testing your water is important if young children or pregnant women
drink your tap water.
Contact a Minnesota Department of Health accredited laboratory to get a sample container and
instructions on how to submit a sample:
Environmental Laboratory Accreditation Program
(https://eldo.web.health.state.mn.us/public/accreditedlabs/labsearch.seam)
The Minnesota Department of Health can help you understand your test results.
4.Treat your water if a test shows your water has high levels of lead after you let the water run.
Read about water treatment units:
Point-of-Use Water Treatment Units for Lead Reduction
(https://www.health.state.mn.us/communities/environment/water/factsheet/poulead.html)
Learn more:
VisitLead in Drinking Water
(https://www.health.state.mn.us/communities/environment/water/contaminants/lead.html)
Visit Basic Information about Lead in Drinking Water (http://www.epa.gov/safewater/lead)
Call the EPA Safe Drinking Water Hotline at 1-800-426-4791.To learn about how to reduce your
contact with lead from sources other than your drinking water, visit Lead Poisoning Prevention:
Common Sources (https://www.health.state.mn.us/communities/environment/lead/sources.html).
PUBLICWATERSUPPLYIDENTIFICATION(PWSID):1020036PAGE7
BQQFOEJY!E!
OPUJDF!PG!BQQSPWBM!PG
XBUFS!TVQQMZQMBO
46
2:4914469
Tuboufd!Dpotvmujoh!Tfswjdft-!Jod/
BQQFOEJY!F!
DPSSFTQPOEFODF
47
2:4914469
Tuboufd!Dpotvmujoh!Tfswjdft-!Jod/
(NOTINCLUDEDINTHISDRAFT)
BQQFOEJY!G!
JXN\[!JOWFOUPSZ
48
2:4914469
Tuboufd!Dpotvmujoh!Tfswjdft-!Jod/
>%()'<%?$%&-*+4$-*&@+A)()B)<%
!"# $$% &'"(& &) ( *"+, "- #(+."/
A')%=)%C+,-&$'+D'<&$E&)<%+.$E&)<%
DFGF+H<I+"J:K8
0,* * &$"1, *&( & *"2,3!1 " 4 *,!5"-012 ."! 0,!*
.&F+D-/*2+6)%%$B<&-++88 "JL :K8
036$ 1"#&* !"252* (" 7,!(&* ,
0#2" ' !"
1,((3 *5
&( #$%&$'()**$
&''! 22#$%&$'()**$+,-&$'+./0$')%&$%1$%&2+#)&3+4-**2+ 55 +6-)%+.&'$$&2+#$%&$'()**$2+67++88 !5
7&1 $ *5"-# $$." 7,!(&* ,
2"*% ! "&"# $$"$,)",!"
&( ,$**+9
&'' * , &$"1, 2*!31* , "
7&1 $ *5" '.
7,!(&* , "&4& $&6$ :
3 83 "# $$" ,9 8 :
!"#!$"%%"&'$"$&()*+
1,3 *5;%<=-
"(!"# $ %&'" #
3 83 "# $$" ,9
0#2" '""H""7&1 $ *5" '
!". 8 :
2,$&* , "' 2*& 1 2"-7 *.$,1&* ,
012 "&1*3&$",!"0,* * &$"
'?C@9"
(?>?<=<"'?C@I>BFC#?@L?>"
2F>C?@?JF" C@9"
1,' 1, *&( &* , "2,3!1
MNN"7@9""DE;<"
;>/"
1;<<=>?@A
#FGGK-:.
5"H" "H"3#FGG
B;<<=>?@A
&OE?B=G@=EIG"!FGI@FP
M;# ;C')E/*&/'-*+E@$?)E-*+N/')$1+0)0)%C8 8 7
M;# 8 8 7
;C')E/*&/'-*+E@$?)E-*+?/*&)0*$+&-%=B+<'+E<%&-)%$'B+O<'+'$B)1$%&)-*+'$&-)*+B-*$+
<'+/B$2+%<+B)%C*$+&-%=+<'+E<%&-)%$'+$IE$$1)%C2+N/&+-CC'$C-&$+(<*/?$+
$IE$$1)%C+8"+C-*F+<'+ +*NBF+1'3+P$)C@&
;#D 8 8 7
;C')E/*&/'-*+E@$?)E-*+&-%=+<'+E<%&-)%$'+P)&@+ 8+C-*F+<'+?<'$+<'+ +*NBF+<'+
?<'$+1'3+P$)C@&2+<'+$Q/)0?$%&+O)**)%C+<'+E*$-%)%C+-'$-+P)&@</&+B-O$C/-'1B
;#. 7
;C')E/*&/'-*+E@$?)E-*+B&<'-C$+<'+$Q/)0?$%&+O)**)%C+<'+E*$-%)%C+-'$-+P)&@+
B-O$C/-'1B
;#R8 8 7
;C')E/*&/'-*+E@$?)E-*+B&<'-C$+<'+$Q/)0?$%&+O)**)%C+<'+E*$-%)%C+-'$-+P)&@+
B-O$C/-'1B+-%1+'<<O$1
;A,;C')E/*&/'-*+1'-)%-C$+P$**S+T#*-BB+U+P$**+L+)**$C-*VW8 8 7
;;X;%@31'</B+-??<%)-+&-%=+TB&-&)<%-'3+&-%=W8 8 7
;H 8 YJ 7
;%)?-*+N/)*1)%C2+O$$1*<&2+E<%O)%$?$%&+-'$-2+<'+=$%%$*2+ F +&<+ F +-%)?-*+/%)&+
TB&<E=3-'1W
;H 8 8 7
;%)?-*+N/)*1)%C+<'+0</*&'3+N/)*1)%C2+)%E*/1)%C+-+@<'B$+')1)%C+-'$-2+?<'$+&@-%+
F +-%)?-*+/%)&
;H.;%)?-*+N/')-*+-'$-2+?<'$+&@-%+ F +-%)?-*+/%)&8 8 7
Z,D;%)?-*+O$$1)%C+<'+P-&$')%C+-'$-+P)&@)%+-+0-B&/'$2+?<'$+&@-%+ F +-%)?-*+/%)&8 8 7
;Z ;%)?-*+O$$1*<&2+/%'<<O$12+! +<'+?<'$+-%)?-*+/%)&B+TB&<E=3-'1W 7
;Z ;%)?-*+O$$1*<&2+?<'$+&@-%+ F 2+N/&+*$BB+&@-%+! +-%)?-*+/%)&B+TB&<E=3-'1W8 8 7
;6;;%)?-*+?-%/'$+-00*)E-&)<%/B$+1)BE'$&)<%/B$+1)BE'$&)<%7
R>7;%)?-*+'$%1$')%C+0*-%&8 8 7
6. 6-%/'$+T*)Q/)1W+B&<'-C$+N-B)%+<'+*-C<<%2+/%0$'?)&&$1+<'+%<%E$'&)O)$1! ! " 7
6. 6-%/'$+T*)Q/)1W+B&<'-C$+N-B)%+<'+*-C<<%2+-00'<($1+$-'&@$%+*)%$' 8 8 ! 7
6.! 7
6-%/'$+T*)Q/)1W+B&<'-C$+N-B)%+<'+*-C<<%2+-00'<($1+E<%E'$&$+<'+E<?0<B)&$+
*)%$'
6.J6-%/'$+TB<*)1W+B&<'-C$+-'$-2+%<&+E<($'$1+P)&@+-+'<<O 7
G.#G0$%+B&<'-C$+O<'+E'<0B/B$+1)BE'$&)<%/B$+1)BE'$&)<%7
22*2"!FGI@FP
;; ! ! " 7
;NB<'0&)<%+-'$-+<O+-+B<)*+1)B0$'B-*+B3B&$?2+-($'-C$+O*<P+C'$-&$'+&@-%+
2 +C-*FY1-3
;; 8 8 ! 7
;NB<'0&)<%+-'$-+<O+-+B<)*+1)B0$'B-*+B3B&$?+B$'()%C+-+O-E)*)&3+@-%1*)%C+
)%O$E&)</B+<'+0-&@<*<C)E-*+P-B&$B2+-($'-C$+O*<P+ 2 +C-*FY1-3+<'+*$BB
;;!8 8 7
;NB<'0&)<%+-'$-+<O+-+B<)*+1)B0$'B-*+B3B&$?2+-($'-C$+O*<P+ 2 +C-*FY1-3+
<'+*$BB
JJJ
;;J8 Y! Y 8 8 Y! Y 8 Y" Y! 7
;NB<'0&)<%+-'$-+<O+-+B<)*+1)B0$'B-*+B3B&$?+B$'()%C+?/*&)0*$+O-?)*3+
'$B)1$%E$B+<'+-+%<%L'$B)1$%&)-*+O-E)*)&3+-%1+@-B+&@$+E-0-E)&3+&<+B$'($+ +<'+
?<'$+0$'B<%B+0$'+1-3+T#*-BB+U+P$**WS
#.D#$BB0<<*K8K8 8 7
;\[\[A'3+P$**2+*$-E@)%C+0)&2+B$$0-C$+0)&K8K8 8 7
MZA Z*<<'+1'-)%2+C'-&$2+<'+&'</C@+E<%%$E&$1+&<+-+N/')$1+B$P$'8 8 7
MZA 8 7
Z*<<'+1'-)%2+C'-&$2+<'+&'</C@+)O+N/')$1+B$P$'+)B+-)'L&$B&$12+-00'<($1+
?-&$')-*B2+B$'()%C+<%$+N/)*1)%C2+<'+&P<+<'+*$BB+B)%C*$LO-?)*3+'$B)1$%E$B
!Y Y
3 83 "# $$" ,9
0#2" '""H""7&1 $ *5" '
!". 8 :
2,$&* , "' 2*& 1 2"-7 *.$,1&* ,
012 "&1*3&$",!"0,* * &$"
'?C@9"
(?>?<=<"'?C@I>BFC#?@L?>"
2F>C?@?JF" C@9"
1,' 1, *&( &* , "2,3!1
MNN"7@9""DE;<"
;>/"
1;<<=>?@A
#FGGK-:.
5"H" "H"3#FGG
B;<<=>?@A
M\[, \['-3LP-&$'+1)B0$'B-*+-'$-8 8 7
\\# \\-'C$+E-0-E)&3+E$BB0<<*B+T#*-BB+U+P$**+L+)**$C-*WSK8K8 8 7
6U,6<&<'+($@)E*$+P-B&$+1)B0<B-*+T#*-BB+U+P$**+L+)**$C-*WS)**$C-*)**$C-*7
DR D')(32+%<%0<'&-N*$8 8 7
DR D<'&-N*$+T0')(3W+<'+&<)*$&8 \]! 7
M.Z ,-&$'&)C@&+B-%1+O)*&$'^+0$-&+O)*&$'^+<'+E<%B&'/E&$1+P$&*-%18 8 7
.>X.$0&)E+&-%=8 8 7
4X_.$P-C$+@<*1)%C+&-%=2+P-&$'&)C@&8 8 7
.. .$P-C$+B/?0+E-0-E)&3+ +C-*F+<'+?<'$8 8 7
.. .$P-C$+B/?0+E-0-E)&3+*$BB+&@-%+ +C-*F2+&$B&$12+E<%O<'?)%C+&<+'/*$8 7
M.X .$P-C$+&'$-&?$%&+1$()E$2+P-&$'&)C@&8 8 7
.H 8 7
.$P$'2+N/')$12+-00'<($1+?-&$')-*B2+&$B&$12+B$'()%C+<%$+N/)*1)%C2+<'+&P<+<'+
*$BB+B)%C*$LO-?)*3+'$B)1$%E$B
.H 8 8 7
.$P$'2+N/')$12+E<**$E&<'2+?/%)E)0-*2+B$'()%C+-+O-E)*)&3+@-%1*)%C+)%O$E&)</B+<'+
0-&@<*<C)E-*+P-B&$B2+<0$%L`<)%&$1+<'+/%-00'<($1+?-&$')-*B
M,H 8 8 7
,-&$'+&'$-&?$%&+N-E=P-B@+@<*1)%C+N-B)%2+'$E*-)?+N-B)%2+<'+B/'C$+&-%=+P)&@+
-+1)'$E&+B$P$'+E<%%$E&)<%
M,H 7
,-&$'+&'$-&?$%&+N-E=P-B@+@<*1)%C+N-B)%2+'$E*-)?+N-B)%2+<'+B/'C$+&-%=+P)&@+
-+N-E=O*<P+0'<&$E&$1+B$P$'+E<%%$E&)<%
$I>P"&QQG?BI@?;>
.DX\\-%1+B0'$-1)%C+-'$-+O<'+B$P-C$2+B$0&-C$2+<'+B*/1C$8 8 7
2;G?P"#IC@F"!FGI@FP
#G.#<??$'E)-*+E<?0<B&+B)&$8 8 7
#A #<%B&'/E&)<%+<'+1$?<*)&)<%+1$N')B+1)B0<B-*+-'$-8 8 7
M4, 4</B$@<*1+B<*)1+P-B&$+1)B0<B-*+-'$-2+B)%C*$+'$B)1$%E$8 8 7
\\Z ! ! " 7
\\-%1O)**2+0$'?)&&$1+1$?<*)&)<%+1$N')B2+1/?02+<'+?)I$1+?/%)E)0-*+B<*)1+P-B&$+
O'<?+?/*&)0*$+0$'B<%B
.U\].E'-0+3-'18 8 7
.,X.<*)1+P-B&$+&'-%BO$'+B&-&)<%8 8 7
2@;E<"#I@FE"!FGI@FP
.A .&<'?+P-&$'+1'-)%+0)0$2+5+)%E@$B+<'+C'$-&$'+)%+1)-?$&$'8 7
.,a.&<'?+P-&$'+1'-)%-C$+P$**S+T#*-BB+U+P$**+L+)**$C-*VW8 8 7
.6 .&<'?+P-&$'+0<%1+C'$-&$'+&@-%+8 +C-*F8 !87
#FGGC"I>P"6;E?>OC
M>H >*$(-&<'+N<')%C2+%<&+E<%O<'?)%C+&<+'/*$8 8 7
M>H >*$(-&<'+N<')%C2+E<%O<'?)%C+&<+'/*$ 7
6G76<%)&<')%C+P$**'$E<'1+1)B&F'$E<'1+1)B&F7
,>\\G0$'-&)%C+P$**'$E<'1+1)B&F'$E<'1+1)B&F\] 8
bb,b%/B$12+/%B$-*$1+P$**+<'+N<')%C8 8 7
)F>FEIG
M#R #)B&$'%+<'+'$B$'(<)'2+N/')$12+%<%0'$BB/')c$1+P-&$'+B/00*3 7
D\\6#<%&-?)%-%&+0*/?$8 8 7
M#, #<<*)%C+P-&$'+0<%12+)%1/B&')-*8 8 7
A# A$)E)%C+E@$?)E-*B2+N/*=+'<-18 8 7
M>X >*$E&')E-*+&'-%BO<'?$'+B&<'-C$+-'$-2+<)*LO)**$18 8 7
\[RU\['-($+<'+?-/B<*$/?8 8 7
\[D \['-($*+0<E=$&+<'+Z'$%E@+1'-)%+O<'+E*$-'+P-&$'+1'-)%-C$+<%*3 7
M4. 4-c-'1</B+B/NB&-%E$+N/')$1+0)0)%C8 8 7
4. 8 8 7
4-c-'1</B+B/NB&-%E$+&-%=+<'+E<%&-)%$'2+-N<($+C'</%1+<'+/%1$'C'</%12+8"+
C-*F+<'+?<'$2+<'+ +*NBF+<'+?<'$+1'3+P$)C@&2+P)&@</&+B-O$C/-'1B
4.! 7
4-c-'1</B+B/NB&-%E$+&-%=+<'+E<%&-)%$'2+-N<($+C'</%1+<'+/%1$'C'</%12+8"+
C-*F+<'+?<'$2+<'+ +*NBF+<'+?<'$+1'3+P$)C@&+P)&@+B-O$C/-'1B
4.J8 8 7
4-c-'1</B+B/NB&-%E$+?/*&)0*$+B&<'-C$+&-%=B+<'+E<%&-)%$'B+O<'+'$B)1$%&)-*+
'$&-)*+B-*$+<'+/B$2+%<+B)%C*$+&-%=+<'+E<%&-)%$'+$IE$$1)%C+8"+C-*F+<'+ +*NBF2+
N/&+-CC'$C-&$+(<*/?$+$IE$$1)%C
4,Z4)C@$B&+P-&$'+<'+O*<<1+*$($*8 7Y;7
M4\[ 4<')c<%&-*+C'</%1+B</'E$+E*<B$1+*<<0+@$-&+$IE@-%C$'+N/')$1+0)0)%C8 8 7
M4\[ 8 7
4<')c<%&-*+C'</%1+B</'E$+E*<B$1+*<<0+@$-&+$IE@-%C$'+N/')$1+0)0)%C+-%1+
@<')c<%&-*+0)0)%C2+-00'<($1+?-&$')-*B+-%1+@$-&+&'-%BO$'+O*/)1
!Y Y
3 83 "# $$" ,9
0#2" '""H""7&1 $ *5" '
!". 8 :
2,$&* , "' 2*& 1 2"-7 *.$,1&* ,
012 "&1*3&$",!"0,* * &$"
'?C@9"
(?>?<=<"'?C@I>BFC#?@L?>"
2F>C?@?JF" C@9"
1,' 1, *&( &* , "2,3!1
MNN"7@9""DE;<"
;>/"
1;<<=>?@A
#FGGK-:.
5"H" "H"3#FGG
B;<<=>?@A
a,Aa%1/B&')-*+P-B&$+1)B0<B-*+P$**+T#*-BB+U+P$**WS)**$C-*V)**$C-*V7
a,.a%&$'E$0&<'2+)%E*/1)%C+-+O*-??-N*$+P-B&$+<'+B$1)?$%&8 8 7
G4 8 !87
G'1)%-'3+@)C@+P-&$'+*$($*+<O+-+B&'$-?2+')($'2+0<%12+*-=$2+'$B$'(<)'2+<'+
1'-)%-C$+1)&E@+T@<*1B+P-&$'+B)I+?<%&@B+<'+?<'$W
MDD D$&'<*$/?+N/')$1+0)0)%C8 8 7
MDD D$&'<*$/?+<'+E'/1$+<)*+0)0$*)%$+&<+-+'$O)%$'3+<'+1)B&')N/&)<%+E$%&$' 7
DX D$&'<*$/?+&-%=+<'+E<%&-)%$'2+ +C-*F+<'+?<'$2+P)&@</&+B-O$C/-'1B 8 8 7
DX D$&'<*$/?+&-%=+<'+E<%&-)%$'2+ +C-*F+<'+?<'$2+P)&@+B-O$C/-'1B 7
DX!D$&'<*$/?+&-%=+<'+E<%&-)%$'2+N/')$12+N$&P$$%+8"+-%1+ +C-*F8 8 7
8
DXJD$&'<*$/?+&-%=+<'+E<%&-)%$'2+%<&+N/')$12+N$&P$$%+8"+-%1+ +C-*F8 7
Db D)&+<'+/%O)**$1+B0-E$+?<'$+&@-%+O</'+O$$&+)%+1$0&@ 7
D# D<**/&-%&+<'+E<%&-?)%-%&+&@-&+?-3+1'-)%+)%&<+&@$+B<)*8 8 7
.D .P)??)%C+0<<*2+)%LC'</%1 7
MU4 U$'&)E-*+@$-&+$IE@-%C$'2+@<')c<%&-*+0)0)%C+E<%O<'?)%C+&<+'/*$8 7
MU4 U$'&)E-*+@$-&+$IE@-%C$'+T($'&)E-*W+0)0)%C2+E<%O<'?)%C+&<+'/*$8 !87
M,R ,-B&$P-&$'+'-0)1+)%O)*&'-&)<%+N-B)%2+?/%)E)0-*+<'+)%1/B&')-*! ! " 7
M,; ,-B&$P-&$'+B0'-3+)'')C-&)<%+-'$-2+?/%)E)0-*+<'+)%1/B&')-* 8 8 ! 7
M,. ,-B&$P-&$'+B&-N)*)c-&)<%+0<%12+)%1/B&')-* 8 8 ! 7
M,. ! ! " 7
,-B&$P-&$'+B&-N)*)c-&)<%+0<%12+?/%)E)0-*2+8 +<'+?<'$+C-*FY-E'$Y1-3+<O+
*$-=-C$
M,.! 8 8 ! 7
,-B&$P-&$'+B&-N)*)c-&)<%+0<%12+?/%)E)0-*2+*$BB+&@-%+8 +C-*FY-E'$Y1-3+<O+
*$-=-C$
M,X ,-B&$P-&$'+&'$-&?$%&+/%)&+&-%=B2+($BB$*B+-%1+E<?0<%$%&B+TD-E=-C$+0*-%&W 7
M,X ,-&$'+&'$-&?$%&+N-E=P-B@+1)B0<B-*+-'$-8 8 7
&PP?@?;>IG"2;=EBFC"- D"@LFEF"?C"<;EF"@LI>";>F"C;=EBF"G?C@FP"IR;JFS"QGFICF"?>P?BI@F"LFEF.9
0;@F>@?IG"1;>@I<?>I@?;>"2;=EBFC"I>P"1;PFC"6ICFP";>"0EFJ?;=C"4FEC?;>C";D"@L?C"7;E<
%<%$+O</%1+P)&@)%+ d+<O+&@)B+P$**F
; <"' =.%"#%$*( 1.#%*6$#*#% !.>/1":
!"#!$%$&" '"(( )*! ("!! %)*# +, -""% .- '*%"/%$0)% 1*!$#02 *#3 ')$1) $! #.% 1*!"3 4"(.' * 1.#-$#$#0 (*5"/ ./ 1.#-$#$#0 6*%"/$*(! .- *% ("*!% 7,8 $# %)$19#"!!:
D E)"!" !.>/1"!2 9#.'# *! F(*!! G >#3"/0/.>#3 $#H"1%$.# '"((!2 */" /"0>(*%"3 45 %)" -"3"/*( I:J: K#&$/.#6"#%*( L/.%"1%$.# 0"#15:
M E)"!" !.>/1"! */" 1(*!!$-$"3 *! $(("0*( 45 N$##"!.%* O>("!2 F)*=%"/ PQR+:
? @!.(*%$.# 3$!%*#1" $! 3"%"/6$#"3 45 *&"/*0" -(.' ="/ 3*5 ./ $- * -*1$($%5 )*#3("! $#-"1%$.>! ./ =*%).(.0$1*( '*!%"!:
A 1.66>#$%5 =>4($1 '*%"/B!>==(5 '"(( 6>!% 4" * 6$#$6>6 .- +, -""% -/.6 * ="%/.(">6 %*#9 ./ 1.#%*$#"/2 >#("!! %)" %*#9 ./ 1.#%*$#"/ $! >!"3 -./ "6"/0"#15
=>6=$#0 *#3 $! (.1*%"3 $# * /..6 ./ 4>$(3$#0 !"=*/*%" -/.6 %)" 1.66>#$%5 '"((C *#3 $! .- 3.>4("B'*(( 1.#!%/>1%$.# '$%) ("*9 3"%"1%$.# 4"%'""# '*((!C ./ $! =/.%"1%"3
'$%) !"1.#3*/5 1.#%*$#6"#%:
X@)B+O<'?+)B+N-B$1+<%+&@$+%$P+)B<*-&)<%+1)B&-%E$B+)%+6)%%$B<&-+R/*$B2+#@-0&$'+JK 82+'$*-&$1+&<+P$**B+-%1+N<')%CB+-1<0&$1+;/C/B&+
J2+ 52+-%1+6)%%$B<&-+R/*$B2+#@-0&$'+JK 2+'$*-&$1+&<+P$**@$-1+0'<&$E&)<%F
!Y Y !
PWS ID / FACILITY ID1020036 S01UNIQUE WELL NO.511091
SETBACK DISTANCESAll potential contaminant sources must be noted on sketch.
Record the distance and approximate compass bearing of each potential contaminant source from the well,
and identify the source using the "Source Code". Unlabeled points on the map are unsealed wells.
0°
315°
45°
50'100'150'200'
270°90°
!(!(
PR2
!(
!(
135°
225°
!(
!(
180°
YNN/A
X
Were the isolation distances maintained for the new sources of contamination?
X
Is the system monitoring existing nonconforming sources of contamination?
Reminder Question: Were the wellhead protection measure(s) implemented?
INSPECTORMcCormack, SimonDATE7 - 20 - 2017
3/20/20204
($)# *##+##,-. % /0# * ! "#$"%%# &'
# $%"
!
$1(#2"-) 3"#
*-/"#
3".&22" *"*#$"%%1"-*#(3&/"./ & #7$1(8#2"-) 3")
2(%"2" /"*4#
9"3 , "*
0#56#
&'()*+,-./0()-+10(-)2'+304)/()*35*(4).64)2(,718(4),(930.,0:)/:).)018(62(4)5.16-(6.68()/3216(22)16)
.88+,4.68();1-')0+8.0<)2-.-(<).64)=(4(,.0),(>31,(5(6-2?))&+)*,(7(6-)2*1002<)*+,-./0()-+10(-2)2'+304)/()0+8.-(4)
16).6).,(.)-'.-)12)(.210:).88(221/0()/:).)*35*)-,38@)364(,).00);(.-'(,)8+641-1+62?
.&22" /)
,56#:;6<=>6#?@:56AB<?5@C#DE>BF>#G5@<BG<H
2?@@>F5<B#*>DB6<A>@<#5:#1>BE<=
*6?@I?@J#$B<>6#(65<>G<?5@#)>G<?5@
)5;6G>#$B<>6#(65<>G<?5@# @?<
('&'#K5L#MNOPQ
)<'#(B;EC#2?@@>F5<B##QQRMNSTOPQ
)>G<?5@#3>G>D<?5@?F<H#MQRSUTRSNPTT
*?V?F?5@#/**H#MQRSUTRSQPOP#56#2 #3>EBW#)>6V?G>#X#RSYTTSMUPSZQUO#B@\[#BFI#:56#MQRSUTRSQTTT
$A# A# #
?%()'=%@$%&-*+4$-*&A+B)()C)=%
!"# $$% &'"(& &) ( *"+, "- #(+."/
B')%>)%D+,-&$'+E'=&$F&)=%+.$F&)=%
EGHG+I=J+";K:8
0,* * &$"1, *&( & *"2,3!1 " 4 *,!5"-012 ."! 0,!*
.&G+E-/*2+6)%%$C=&-++88 ";L K:8
036$ 1"#&* !"252* (" 7,!(&* ,
0#2" ' !"
1,((3 *5
&( #$%&$'()**$
&''! 22#$%&$'()**$+,-&$'+./0$')%&$%1$%&2+#)&3+4-**2+ 55 +6-)%+.&'$$&2+#$%&$'()**$2+67++88 !5
7&1 $ *5"-# $$." 7,!(&* ,
2"*% ! "&"# $$"$,)",!"
&( ,$**+9
&'' * , &$"1, 2*!31* , "
7&1 $ *5" '.
7,!(&* , "&4& $&6$ :
3 83 "# $$" ,9 8 :;5
!"#!$"%%"&'$"$&()*+
1,3 *5<%=>-
"(!"# $ %&'" #
3 83 "# $$" ,9
0#2" '""H""7&1 $ *5" '
!". 8 :;5
2,$&* , "' 2*& 1 2"-7 *.$,1&* ,
012 "&1*3&$",!"0,* * &$"
'?C@9"
(?>?<=<"'?C@I>BFC#?@L?>"
2F>C?@?JF" C@9"
1,' 1, *&( &* , "2,3!1
MNN"7@9""DE;<"
;>/"
1;<<=>?@A
#FGGK-:.
5"H" "H"3#FGG
B;<<=>?@A
&OE?B=G@=EIG"!FGI@FP
M<# <D')F/*&/'-*+FA$@)F-*+N/')$1+0)0)%D8 8 7
M<# 8 8 7
<D')F/*&/'-*+FA$@)F-*+@/*&)0*$+&-%>C+='+F=%&-)%$'C+O='+'$C)1$%&)-*+'$&-)*+C-*$+
='+/C$2+%=+C)%D*$+&-%>+='+F=%&-)%$'+$JF$$1)%D2+N/&+-DD'$D-&$+(=*/@$+
$JF$$1)%D+8"+D-*G+='+ +*NCG+1'3+P$)DA&
<#E 8 8 7
<D')F/*&/'-*+FA$@)F-*+&-%>+='+F=%&-)%$'+P)&A+ 8+D-*G+='+@='$+='+ +*NCG+='+
@='$+1'3+P$)DA&2+='+$Q/)0@$%&+O)**)%D+='+F*$-%)%D+-'$-+P)&A=/&+C-O$D/-'1C
<#. 7
<D')F/*&/'-*+FA$@)F-*+C&='-D$+='+$Q/)0@$%&+O)**)%D+='+F*$-%)%D+-'$-+P)&A+
C-O$D/-'1C
<#R8 8 7
<D')F/*&/'-*+FA$@)F-*+C&='-D$+='+$Q/)0@$%&+O)**)%D+='+F*$-%)%D+-'$-+P)&A+
C-O$D/-'1C+-%1+'==O$1
<B,<D')F/*&/'-*+1'-)%-D$+P$**S+T#*-CC+U+P$**+L+)**$D-*VW8 8 7
<<X<%A31'=/C+-@@=%)-+&-%>+TC&-&)=%-'3+&-%>W8 8 7
<I 8 Y; 7
<%)@-*+N/)*1)%D2+O$$1*=&2+F=%O)%$@$%&+-'$-2+='+>$%%$*2+ G +&=+ G +-%)@-*+/%)&+
TC&=F>3-'1W
<I 8 8 7
<%)@-*+N/)*1)%D+='+0=/*&'3+N/)*1)%D2+)%F*/1)%D+-+A='C$+')1)%D+-'$-2+@='$+&A-%+
G +-%)@-*+/%)&
<I.<%)@-*+N/')-*+-'$-2+@='$+&A-%+ G +-%)@-*+/%)&8 8 7
Z,E<%)@-*+O$$1)%D+='+P-&$')%D+-'$-+P)&A)%+-+0-C&/'$2+@='$+&A-%+ G +-%)@-*+/%)&8 8 7
<Z <%)@-*+O$$1*=&2+/%'==O$12+! +='+@='$+-%)@-*+/%)&C+TC&=F>3-'1W 7
<Z <%)@-*+O$$1*=&2+@='$+&A-%+ G 2+N/&+*$CC+&A-%+! +-%)@-*+/%)&C+TC&=F>3-'1W8 8 7
<6<<%)@-*+@-%/'$+-00*)F-&)=%/C$+1)CF'$&)=%/C$+1)CF'$&)=%7
R?7<%)@-*+'$%1$')%D+0*-%&8 8 7
6. 6-%/'$+T*)Q/)1W+C&='-D$+N-C)%+='+*-D==%2+/%0$'@)&&$1+='+%=%F$'&)O)$1! ! " 7
6. 6-%/'$+T*)Q/)1W+C&='-D$+N-C)%+='+*-D==%2+-00'=($1+$-'&A$%+*)%$' 8 8 ! 7
6.! 7
6-%/'$+T*)Q/)1W+C&='-D$+N-C)%+='+*-D==%2+-00'=($1+F=%F'$&$+='+F=@0=C)&$+
*)%$'
6.;6-%/'$+TC=*)1W+C&='-D$+-'$-2+%=&+F=($'$1+P)&A+-+'==O 7
H.#H0$%+C&='-D$+O='+F'=0C/C$+1)CF'$&)=%/C$+1)CF'$&)=%7
22*2"!FGI@FP
<< ! ! " 7
<NC='0&)=%+-'$-+=O+-+C=)*+1)C0$'C-*+C3C&$@2+-($'-D$+O*=P+D'$-&$'+&A-%+
2 +D-*GY1-3
<< 8 8 ! 7
<NC='0&)=%+-'$-+=O+-+C=)*+1)C0$'C-*+C3C&$@+C$'()%D+-+O-F)*)&3+A-%1*)%D+
)%O$F&)=/C+='+0-&A=*=D)F-*+P-C&$C2+-($'-D$+O*=P+ 2 +D-*GY1-3+='+*$CC
<<!8 8 7
<NC='0&)=%+-'$-+=O+-+C=)*+1)C0$'C-*+C3C&$@2+-($'-D$+O*=P+ 2 +D-*GY1-3+
='+*$CC
;;;
<<;8 Y! Y 8 8 Y! Y 8 Y" Y! 7
<NC='0&)=%+-'$-+=O+-+C=)*+1)C0$'C-*+C3C&$@+C$'()%D+@/*&)0*$+O-@)*3+
'$C)1$%F$C+='+-+%=%L'$C)1$%&)-*+O-F)*)&3+-%1+A-C+&A$+F-0-F)&3+&=+C$'($+ +='+
@='$+0$'C=%C+0$'+1-3+T#*-CC+U+P$**WS
#.E#$CC0==*:8:8 8 7
<\[\[B'3+P$**2+*$-FA)%D+0)&2+C$$0-D$+0)&:8:8 8 7
MZB Z*=='+1'-)%2+D'-&$2+='+&'=/DA+F=%%$F&$1+&=+-+N/')$1+C$P$'8 8 7
MZB 8 7
Z*=='+1'-)%2+D'-&$2+='+&'=/DA+)O+N/')$1+C$P$'+)C+-)'L&$C&$12+-00'=($1+
@-&$')-*C2+C$'()%D+=%$+N/)*1)%D2+='+&P=+='+*$CC+C)%D*$LO-@)*3+'$C)1$%F$C
!Y Y
3 83 "# $$" ,9
0#2" '""H""7&1 $ *5" '
!". 8 :;5
2,$&* , "' 2*& 1 2"-7 *.$,1&* ,
012 "&1*3&$",!"0,* * &$"
'?C@9"
(?>?<=<"'?C@I>BFC#?@L?>"
2F>C?@?JF" C@9"
1,' 1, *&( &* , "2,3!1
MNN"7@9""DE;<"
;>/"
1;<<=>?@A
#FGGK-:.
5"H" "H"3#FGG
B;<<=>?@A
M\[, \['-3LP-&$'+1)C0$'C-*+-'$-8 8 7
\\# \\-'D$+F-0-F)&3+F$CC0==*C+T#*-CC+U+P$**+L+)**$D-*WS:8:8 8 7
6U,6=&='+($A)F*$+P-C&$+1)C0=C-*+T#*-CC+U+P$**+L+)**$D-*WS)**$D-*)**$D-*7
ER E')(32+%=%0='&-N*$8 8 7
ER E='&-N*$+T0')(3W+='+&=)*$&8 7
M.Z ,-&$'&)DA&+C-%1+O)*&$'\]+0$-&+O)*&$'\]+='+F=%C&'/F&$1+P$&*-%18 8 7
.?X.$0&)F+&-%>8 8 7
4X^.$P-D$+A=*1)%D+&-%>2+P-&$'&)DA&8 8 7
.. .$P-D$+C/@0+F-0-F)&3+ +D-*G+='+@='$8 8 7
.. .$P-D$+C/@0+F-0-F)&3+*$CC+&A-%+ +D-*G2+&$C&$12+F=%O='@)%D+&=+'/*$8 7
M.X .$P-D$+&'$-&@$%&+1$()F$2+P-&$'&)DA&8 8 7
.I 8 7
.$P$'2+N/')$12+-00'=($1+@-&$')-*C2+&$C&$12+C$'()%D+=%$+N/)*1)%D2+='+&P=+='+
*$CC+C)%D*$LO-@)*3+'$C)1$%F$C
.I 8 8 7
.$P$'2+N/')$12+F=**$F&='2+@/%)F)0-*2+C$'()%D+-+O-F)*)&3+A-%1*)%D+)%O$F&)=/C+='+
0-&A=*=D)F-*+P-C&$C2+=0$%L_=)%&$1+='+/%-00'=($1+@-&$')-*C
M,I 8 8 7
,-&$'+&'$-&@$%&+N-F>P-CA+A=*1)%D+N-C)%2+'$F*-)@+N-C)%2+='+C/'D$+&-%>+P)&A+
-+1)'$F&+C$P$'+F=%%$F&)=%
M,I 7
,-&$'+&'$-&@$%&+N-F>P-CA+A=*1)%D+N-C)%2+'$F*-)@+N-C)%2+='+C/'D$+&-%>+P)&A+
-+N-F>O*=P+0'=&$F&$1+C$P$'+F=%%$F&)=%
$I>P"&QQG?BI@?;>
.EX\\-%1+C0'$-1)%D+-'$-+O='+C$P-D$2+C$0&-D$2+='+C*/1D$8 8 7
2;G?P"#IC@F"!FGI@FP
#H.#=@@$'F)-*+F=@0=C&+C)&$8 8 7
#B #=%C&'/F&)=%+='+1$@=*)&)=%+1$N')C+1)C0=C-*+-'$-8 8 7
M4, 4=/C$A=*1+C=*)1+P-C&$+1)C0=C-*+-'$-2+C)%D*$+'$C)1$%F$8 8 7
\\Z ! ! " 7
\\-%1O)**2+0$'@)&&$1+1$@=*)&)=%+1$N')C2+1/@02+='+@)J$1+@/%)F)0-*+C=*)1+P-C&$+
O'=@+@/*&)0*$+0$'C=%C
.U`.F'-0+3-'18 8 7
.,X.=*)1+P-C&$+&'-%CO$'+C&-&)=%8 8 7
2@;E<"#I@FE"!FGI@FP
.B .&='@+P-&$'+1'-)%+0)0$2+5+)%FA$C+='+D'$-&$'+)%+1)-@$&$'8 7
.,a.&='@+P-&$'+1'-)%-D$+P$**S+T#*-CC+U+P$**+L+)**$D-*VW8 8 7
.6 .&='@+P-&$'+0=%1+D'$-&$'+&A-%+8 +D-*G8 !8` `
#FGGC"I>P"6;E?>OC
M?I ?*$(-&='+N=')%D2+%=&+F=%O='@)%D+&=+'/*$8 8 7
M?I ?*$(-&='+N=')%D2+F=%O='@)%D+&=+'/*$ 7
6H76=%)&=')%D+P$**'$F='1+1)C&G'$F='1+1)C&G7
,?\\H0$'-&)%D+P$**'$F='1+1)C&G'$F='1+1)C&G7
bb,b%/C$12+/%C$-*$1+P$**+='+N=')%D8 8 7
)F>FEIG
M#R #)C&$'%+='+'$C$'(=)'2+N/')$12+%=%0'$CC/')c$1+P-&$'+C/00*3 7
E\\6#=%&-@)%-%&+0*/@$8 8 7
M#, #==*)%D+P-&$'+0=%12+)%1/C&')-*8 8 7
B# B$)F)%D+FA$@)F-*C2+N/*>+'=-18 8 7
M?X ?*$F&')F-*+&'-%CO='@$'+C&='-D$+-'$-2+=)*LO)**$18 8 7
\[RU\['-($+='+@-/C=*$/@8 8 7
\[E \['-($*+0=F>$&+='+Z'$%FA+1'-)%+O='+F*$-'+P-&$'+1'-)%-D$+=%*3 7
M4. 4-c-'1=/C+C/NC&-%F$+N/')$1+0)0)%D8 8 7
4. 8 8 7
4-c-'1=/C+C/NC&-%F$+&-%>+='+F=%&-)%$'2+-N=($+D'=/%1+='+/%1$'D'=/%12+8"+
D-*G+='+@='$2+='+ +*NCG+='+@='$+1'3+P$)DA&2+P)&A=/&+C-O$D/-'1C
4.! 7
4-c-'1=/C+C/NC&-%F$+&-%>+='+F=%&-)%$'2+-N=($+D'=/%1+='+/%1$'D'=/%12+8"+
D-*G+='+@='$2+='+ +*NCG+='+@='$+1'3+P$)DA&+P)&A+C-O$D/-'1C
4.;8 8 7
4-c-'1=/C+C/NC&-%F$+@/*&)0*$+C&='-D$+&-%>C+='+F=%&-)%$'C+O='+'$C)1$%&)-*+
'$&-)*+C-*$+='+/C$2+%=+C)%D*$+&-%>+='+F=%&-)%$'+$JF$$1)%D+8"+D-*G+='+ +*NCG2+
N/&+-DD'$D-&$+(=*/@$+$JF$$1)%D
4,Z4)DA$C&+P-&$'+='+O*==1+*$($*8 7Y<7
M4\[ 4=')c=%&-*+D'=/%1+C=/'F$+F*=C$1+*==0+A$-&+$JFA-%D$'+N/')$1+0)0)%D8 8 7
M4\[ 8 7
4=')c=%&-*+D'=/%1+C=/'F$+F*=C$1+*==0+A$-&+$JFA-%D$'+N/')$1+0)0)%D+-%1+
A=')c=%&-*+0)0)%D2+-00'=($1+@-&$')-*C+-%1+A$-&+&'-%CO$'+O*/)1
!Y Y
3 83 "# $$" ,9
0#2" '""H""7&1 $ *5" '
!". 8 :;5
2,$&* , "' 2*& 1 2"-7 *.$,1&* ,
012 "&1*3&$",!"0,* * &$"
'?C@9"
(?>?<=<"'?C@I>BFC#?@L?>"
2F>C?@?JF" C@9"
1,' 1, *&( &* , "2,3!1
MNN"7@9""DE;<"
;>/"
1;<<=>?@A
#FGGK-:.
5"H" "H"3#FGG
B;<<=>?@A
a,Ba%1/C&')-*+P-C&$+1)C0=C-*+P$**+T#*-CC+U+P$**WS)**$D-*V)**$D-*V7
a,.a%&$'F$0&='2+)%F*/1)%D+-+O*-@@-N*$+P-C&$+='+C$1)@$%&8 8 7
H4 8 !87
H'1)%-'3+A)DA+P-&$'+*$($*+=O+-+C&'$-@2+')($'2+0=%12+*->$2+'$C$'(=)'2+='+
1'-)%-D$+1)&FA+TA=*1C+P-&$'+C)J+@=%&AC+='+@='$W
MEE E$&'=*$/@+N/')$1+0)0)%D8 8 7
MEE E$&'=*$/@+='+F'/1$+=)*+0)0$*)%$+&=+-+'$O)%$'3+='+1)C&')N/&)=%+F$%&$' 7
EX E$&'=*$/@+&-%>+='+F=%&-)%$'2+ +D-*G+='+@='$2+P)&A=/&+C-O$D/-'1C 8 8 7
EX E$&'=*$/@+&-%>+='+F=%&-)%$'2+ +D-*G+='+@='$2+P)&A+C-O$D/-'1C 7
EX!E$&'=*$/@+&-%>+='+F=%&-)%$'2+N/')$12+N$&P$$%+8"+-%1+ +D-*G8 8 7
8
EX;E$&'=*$/@+&-%>+='+F=%&-)%$'2+%=&+N/')$12+N$&P$$%+8"+-%1+ +D-*G8 ` K;`
Eb E)&+='+/%O)**$1+C0-F$+@='$+&A-%+O=/'+O$$&+)%+1$0&A 7
E# E=**/&-%&+='+F=%&-@)%-%&+&A-&+@-3+1'-)%+)%&=+&A$+C=)*8 8 7
.E .P)@@)%D+0==*2+)%LD'=/%1 7
MU4 U$'&)F-*+A$-&+$JFA-%D$'2+A=')c=%&-*+0)0)%D+F=%O='@)%D+&=+'/*$8 7
MU4 U$'&)F-*+A$-&+$JFA-%D$'+T($'&)F-*W+0)0)%D2+F=%O='@)%D+&=+'/*$8 !87
M,R ,-C&$P-&$'+'-0)1+)%O)*&'-&)=%+N-C)%2+@/%)F)0-*+='+)%1/C&')-*! ! " 7
M,< ,-C&$P-&$'+C0'-3+)'')D-&)=%+-'$-2+@/%)F)0-*+='+)%1/C&')-* 8 8 ! 7
M,. ,-C&$P-&$'+C&-N)*)c-&)=%+0=%12+)%1/C&')-* 8 8 ! 7
M,. ! ! " 7
,-C&$P-&$'+C&-N)*)c-&)=%+0=%12+@/%)F)0-*2+8 +='+@='$+D-*GY-F'$Y1-3+=O+
*$->-D$
M,.! 8 8 ! 7
,-C&$P-&$'+C&-N)*)c-&)=%+0=%12+@/%)F)0-*2+*$CC+&A-%+8 +D-*GY-F'$Y1-3+=O+
*$->-D$
M,X ,-C&$P-&$'+&'$-&@$%&+/%)&+&-%>C2+($CC$*C+-%1+F=@0=%$%&C+TE-F>-D$+0*-%&W 7
M,X ,-&$'+&'$-&@$%&+N-F>P-CA+1)C0=C-*+-'$-8 8 7
&PP?@?;>IG"2;=EBFC"- D"@LFEF"?C"<;EF"@LI>";>F"C;=EBF"G?C@FP"IR;JFS"QGFICF"?>P?BI@F"LFEF.9
0;@F>@?IG"1;>@I<?>I@?;>"2;=EBFC"I>P"1;PFC"6ICFP";>"0EFJ?;=C"4FEC?;>C";D"@L?C"7;E<
%=%$+O=/%1+P)&A)%+ d+=O+&A)C+P$**G
; <"' =.%"#%$*( 1.#%*6$#*#% !.>/1":
!"#!$%$&" '"(( )*! ("!! %)*# +, -""% .- '*%"/%$0)% 1*!$#02 *#3 ')$1) $! #.% 1*!"3 4"(.' * 1.#-$#$#0 (*5"/ ./ 1.#-$#$#0 6*%"/$*(! .- *% ("*!% 7,8 $# %)$19#"!!:
D E)"!" !.>/1"!2 9#.'# *! F(*!! G >#3"/0/.>#3 $#H"1%$.# '"((!2 */" /"0>(*%"3 45 %)" -"3"/*( I:J: K#&$/.#6"#%*( L/.%"1%$.# 0"#15:
M E)"!" !.>/1"! */" 1(*!!$-$"3 *! $(("0*( 45 N$##"!.%* O>("!2 F)*=%"/ PQR+:
? @!.(*%$.# 3$!%*#1" $! 3"%"/6$#"3 45 *&"/*0" -(.' ="/ 3*5 ./ $- * -*1$($%5 )*#3("! $#-"1%$.>! ./ =*%).(.0$1*( '*!%"!:
A 1.66>#$%5 =>4($1 '*%"/B!>==(5 '"(( 6>!% 4" * 6$#$6>6 .- +, -""% -/.6 * ="%/.(">6 %*#9 ./ 1.#%*$#"/2 >#("!! %)" %*#9 ./ 1.#%*$#"/ $! >!"3 -./ "6"/0"#15
=>6=$#0 *#3 $! (.1*%"3 $# * /..6 ./ 4>$(3$#0 !"=*/*%" -/.6 %)" 1.66>#$%5 '"((C *#3 $! .- 3.>4("B'*(( 1.#!%/>1%$.# '$%) ("*9 3"%"1%$.# 4"%'""# '*((!C ./ $! =/.%"1%"3
'$%) !"1.#3*/5 1.#%*$#6"#%:
XA)C+O='@+)C+N-C$1+=%+&A$+%$P+)C=*-&)=%+1)C&-%F$C+)%+6)%%$C=&-+R/*$C2+#A-0&$'+;: 82+'$*-&$1+&=+P$**C+-%1+N=')%DC+-1=0&$1+</D/C&+
;2+ 52+-%1+6)%%$C=&-+R/*$C2+#A-0&$'+;: 2+'$*-&$1+&=+P$**A$-1+0'=&$F&)=%G
!Y Y !
PWS ID / FACILITY ID1020036 S02UNIQUE WELL NO.512748
SETBACK DISTANCESAll potential contaminant sources must be noted on sketch.
Record the distance and approximate compass bearing of each potential contaminant source from the well,
and identify the source using the "Source Code". Unlabeled points on the map are unsealed wells.
0°
315°
45°
PT4
#*
50'100'150'200'
270°90°
!(!(
SM1
#*
135°
225°
180°
YNN/A
X
Were the isolation distances maintained for the new sources of contamination?
X
Is the system monitoring existing nonconforming sources of contamination?
Reminder Question: Were the wellhead protection measure(s) implemented?
INSPECTORMcCormack, SimonDATE7 - 20 - 2017
3/20/20204
($)# *##+##,-. % /0# * ! "#$"%%# &'
% %%&'$%
!"#
$1(#2"-) 3"#
*-/"#
3".&22" *"*#$"%%1"-*#(3&/"./ & #7$1(8#2"-) 3")
2(%"2" /"*4#
9"3 , "*
0#56#
.&22" /)
,56#:;6<=>6#?@:56AB<?5@C#DE>BF>#G5@<BG<H
2?@@>F5<B#*>DB6<A>@<#5:#1>BE<=
*6?@I?@J#$B<>6#(65<>G<?5@#)>G<?5@
)5;6G>#$B<>6#(65<>G<?5@# @?<
('&'#K5L#MNOPQ
)<'#(B;EC#2?@@>F5<B##QQRMNSTOPQ
)>G<?5@#3>G>D<?5@?F<H#MQRSUTRSNPTT
*?V?F?5@#/**H#MQRSUTRSQPOP#56#2 #3>EBW#)>6V?G>#X#RSYTTSMUPSZQUO#B@\[#BFI#:56#MQRSUTRSQTTT
&( %( % %
BQQFOEJY!H!
EPDVNFOUBUJPO!PG!QVCMJD!IFBSJOH
49
2:4914469
Tuboufd!Dpotvmujoh!Tfswjdft-!Jod/
(NOTINCLUDEDINTHISDRAFT)
BQQFOEJY!I!
DJUZ!PG!DFOUFSWJMMF
QBSU!2!XFMMIFBE!QSPUFDUJPO!QMBO
4:
2:4914469
Tuboufd!Dpotvmujoh!Tfswjdft-!Jod/
CITY OF CENTERVILLE
WELLHEAD PROTECTION PLAN
PART I (AMENDMENT)
, 2018
Stantec Project No. 193803358
CITY OF CENTERVILLE
WELLHEAD PROTECTION PLAN – PART 1
(AMENDMENT)
BER 2, 2018
WELLHEAD PROTECTION AREA AND DRINKING WATER SUPPLY
MANAGEMENT AREA DELINEATION AND VULNERABILITY
ASSESSMENTS
I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was
prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I
am a duly Licensed Professional Geologist under the laws
of the State of Minnesota.
Print Name: MARK JANOVEC
Signature: __________________________________
Date:EMBER 2, 2018 License # 45625
1
Table of Contents
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................ 3
CHAPTER 1: DATA ELEMENTS and ASSESSMENT ............................................................... 5
CHAPTER 2: WELLHEAD PROTECTION AREA and DRINKING WATER SUPPLY
MANAGEMENT AREA DELINEATION ................................................................................... 9
CHAPTER 3: VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT .................................................................... 12
REFERENCES .............................................................................................................................. 14
TABLES
Table 1 Centerville Water Supply Well Information
Table 2 Centerville Well Pumping Volumes
Table 3 Permitted High Capacity Wells Within Two Miles of Centerville’s Municipal Wells
Table 4 Aquifer Parameters
Table 5 Calculation of Fixed Radius for Prairie du Chien Fracture Flow Assessment
FIGURES
Figure 1 Porous Model Delineation, Prairie du Chien Aquifer
Figure 2 Fracture Model Delineation, Prairie du Chien Aquifer
Figure 3 WHPA and DWSMA Delineation
Figure 4 DWSMA Vulnerability
APPENDICES
Appendix A City of Centerville Well Logs
Appendix B Model Calibration Results
Appendix C Well Vulnerability Assessment Worksheets
Appendix D Assessment of Data Elements
2
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
This report documents the amended delineation of the wellhead protection area (WHPA) and drinking
water supply management area (DWSMA) and the vulnerability assessments for the wells and
DWSMAfor the City of Centerville (PWSID 1020036) drinking water supply wells (Table 1). The
amendedplan covers in Table 1
. Well logs are presented in Appendix A. The delineationwas performed in
accordancewith rules (Minnesota Rules 4720.5100 to 4720.5590) for preparing and implementing
wellheadprotection measures for public water supply wells. The rules are administeredby the
MinnesotaDepartment of Health (MDH), and the results described in this report were prepared by
Stantec.
The City of Centerville currently obtains its drinking water supply from one primary well completed
inthe Prairie du Chien aquifer, with one emergency backup well completed in the Jordan aquifer.
TheWHPAand DWSMA delineations and vulnerability assessments for the City’s wells was
initially prepared in May 2001 by the MDH in the report City of Centerville Wellhead Protection
Plan,Part 1.Since the time that plan was completed, the Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) has
updated their guidance for delineating wellhead protection areas in setting where bedrock aquifers
(suchas the Prairie duChien) are fractured and can potentially rapidly transmit water (and
contaminants).Also, the 10-year delineation update deadline has passed, necessitating an update
to the City’s wellhead protection delineations. As such, a full update is being undertaken to bring
the Part 1 plan up to date.
Acomputer groundwater modeling platform was utilized for this project. The porous-flow portion
ofthe wellhead protection areas (WHPAs) for Centerville’s wells was delineated using a modified
versionof the Metropolitan Councils Metro Model 3, released in 2014. This model is a steady state
MODFLOWmodel built using Groundwater Vistas. The model was updated to reflect current
pumping and geological conditions in and near the area around the Centerville well field. The
modelwas used to delineate one-year and ten-year porous-flow capture zones for Centerville
(Figure 1).
A fracture flow analysis was then undertaken using current MDH methodology to predict the area of the
Prairie du Chien aquifer that is capable of rapidly transmittingwater to the City’s primary water supply
well (Well 2). This fracture flow delineation was created by utilizing MDH guidance developed for
fracture flow settings. The calculated area is shown in Figure 2.
Theporous-flow and fracture-flow areas calculated werecombined to create the composite
wellheadprotection area (WHPA). The drinking water supply management area (DWSMA) was
determined for the WHPA by using property parcels and roadways as boundaries. Figure 3 shows
the boundaries of both the WHPA and the DWSMA.
The amount of geologic protection documented in well logs from the water supply wells and
regionalinformation,along with water quality information was used to determine well
vulnerability.Centerville’s primary well (Well 2) is considered vulnerable to contamination, with
elevated tritium levelsbeing the main reasons for the vulnerable classification.Tritium is
harmless in water, but indicatesthat some portion of the water is less than 60 years old. Centerville’s
wellsappear to meet the constructionstandards of the State Well Code, however, and the wells
themselves are not considered a likely avenue for contamination to reach the aquifer from which
they pump.
3
younger water is reaching the aquifer. Therefore, a “moderate” vulnerability was designated for the
DWSMA, as showing in Figure 4. DWSMA vulnerability will be used to define the scope of activities
required to complete the amendment to Part 2 of the Wellhead Protection Plan.
4
CHAPTER ONE
DATA ELEMENTS and ASSESSMENT (4720.5200)
PART 1. REQUIRED DATA ELEMENTS
This section contains required data elements that were outlined in the Scoping Decision
Notice provided to Centerville by the MDH. Appendix E contains a table assessing the data
elements required for this plan. Below is a summary of each data element.
A.Physical Environment Data Elements
Geology, soils, and water resources data elements are provided in City of Centerville Wellhead
Protection Plan, Part 1 (MDH, 2001).
The below table represents updated precipitation data from the Centerville area in inches, as
calculated by the Minnesota Climatology Working Group’s online gridded precipitation database.
The database correlates available surrounding precipitation data points to determine approximate
precipitation values in the area of interest.
Centerville Precipitation (inches), Minnesota Climatology Gridded Database
YearJanFebMar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Total
20170.870.700.593.365.983.592.825.501.484.830.620.8432.12
20160.340.922.003.032.234.804.768.376.862.922.351.9642.41
20150.390.360.532.006.464.617.563.784.973.294.051.7634.62
20141.431.360.866.904.7310.552.144.542.621.291.511.1641.09
20130.621.312.184.684.756.682.820.681.383.760.731.4729.18
20120.661.611.402.489.873.454.930.980.581.450.971.6627.89
2011 0.86 1.242.353.045.133.767.174.510.710.970.240.7235.43
20100.560.720.871.482.724.914.283.995.251.492.252.9234.06
20090.441.121.201.540.403.482.556.830.546.570.482.2322.84
20080.110.521.703.743.813.552.942.562.431.751.331.6628.69
Avg0.600.991.373.234.614.944.204.172.682.831.451.6432.83
Average annual precipitation over the 10-year period from 2008 to 2017 was 32.8 inches, which
is close to the 1981-2010 mean of 32.3 inches for the area. Precipitation is accounted for as
recharge in the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area Regional Groundwater Flow Model Version 3.00
(Metropolitan Council, 2014).
B.Land Use Data Elements
1.Land use – Land use was generally not considered for the Part 1 wellhead protection
activities. Land use will be covered in greater detail in the updated Part 2 plan, where
the role of land use on water quality will be closely reviewed.
2.Public utility services – The only public utilities that play a role in the Part 1 Wellhead
Protection Plan are the municipal water supply wells in Centerville and other nearby
public water supply wells for surrounding communities that utilize the same aquifers.
Table 2 shows the modeled rates of the wells operated by Centerville. All high capacity
wells in the DNR SWUDs database were already included in the MODFLOW model.
However, all permitted high capacity wells within two miles of the Centerville wells
5
have been modified in the model to reflect current conditions. Table 3 shows the
modeled rates of these high capacity wells. High capacity wells beyond two miles retain
the original pumping rates assigned to them in the Metropolitan Council’s 2014
modeling effort. Well usage is also addressed in Part 2 of this chapter.
Water Quantity Data Elements
Surface water quantity– The Minnesota River and Mississippi River are the major
discharge features located within the domain of the model developed for this project.
Numerous smaller discharge features havebeen added to the model domain and are
explained in greater detail in the Metropolitan Council’s technical report for the
Metropolitan Model (May 2014).
Groundwater quantity- Review of groundwater appropriations permits in the State
Water Use Data System (
SWUDS) databasewas performed to identify high capacity
wells in the area that might affect delineation of the wellhead protection area. Most high
capacity wells as of 2014 were includedin the Metropolitan Council’s model. High
capacity wells within two miles of the Centerville wells were updated in the model for
the purposes ofthis delineation effort and are listed in Table 3. The City of Centerville
we modeled at the rate outlinedin the wellhead protection
rules, based onhistorical or projected within with 5 yearsof the current date. Modeled
Centerville wellrates are shown in Table 2.
Water Quality Data Elements
Surface water quality– Major surface water features in the area, such as the Minnesota
River and Mississippi River, which are in direct hydraulic connection with the Prairie
du Chien and Jordan aquifers, serve as flow boundaries within select layers of the
Metropolitan Model. The Prairie du Chien and Jordan aquifers are also in connection
with more localized streams and lakes, as documented in the Met Council model report
(May 2014). Since these major rivers are points of drainage fromthe aquifers, the
quality ofwater in these rivers does not playa large role in Centerville’s water quality.
More pertinent is the quality of stormwater that infiltrates into the capture zones forthe
City’s wells. Surface water quality will be addressed in greater detail in the updated Part
2 plan.
Groundwater quality– Results ofroutine monitoring ofthe Centerville wells are
contained within the files ofthe MinnesotaDepartment of Health. Historical monitoring
has shown that the water qualitywithin the Jordan aquifer in Centerville is generally of
excellent quality. Nitrates levels in Centerville’s wells remain low(less than 1.0 mg/L),
indicating that nitrates-contaminants from turf fertilization is not impacting groundwater
quality.
Sampling of tritiumhas taken place at Centerville Wells 1 and 2. Tritiumis an isotope
ofhydrogen that was released into the atmosphere during the above-ground testing of
nuclear weapons in the early 1950s. While harmless, the presence of tritiumin aquifers
indicates that someportion ofthe water was in contact with the atmosphere within the
past 60 years. A tritiumlevel of1 tritiumunit (TU) or greater is an indication that these
aquifers are somewhat vulnerable to contamination. The tritiumlevels range between
non-detection (<0.8 TU) in Well 1 to 2.6 TU in Well 2.
6
PART 2. ASSESSMENT OF DATA ELEMENTS USED TO DELINEATE THE WELLHEAD
PROTECTION AREA
A. Use of the Wells – The wells shown in Table 1 serve as the primary drinking water source for
residents of the City of Centerville who are connected to the City’s water supply system. Well
2 is the primary well and Well 1 serves as an emergency backup. The City also maintains an
interconnection with the City of Lino Lakes that is capable of supplying 2000gpm. This
interconnection is only used during emergencies or periods when the City’s wells are
unavailable for pumping.
Table 2 shows a comparison of the usage of the City of Centerville wells for the past five
years versus a projected pumping rate 5 years into the future. The greatest amount of pumping
from any of these years is used to represent the pumping rate for that well in the groundwater
model. This is done for the purpose of developing a delineation that is conservative and takes
into account the potential volume each well may be pumped in the near future.
Other high capacity wells being included within the model, but not being delineated in the
plan, are modeled using an average pumping rate taken from a 5-year period. This is
explained in greater detail in the Metropolitan Council’s 2014 technical report for the
Metropolitan Model. High capacity wells within two miles of the Centerville wells are shown
in Table 3. These wells were modeled based on an average rate from the years 2012-2016.
These pumping volumes modify the volumes originally modeled by the Metropolitan Council.
B. Wellhead Protection Area Delineation Criteria
1.Time of travel – The minimum time-of-travel for porous-flow aquifer delineations is 10-
years, which is what was used for the Prairie du Chien aquifer. For the fracture-flow
delineation, a 5-year fixed radius with a 5-year upgradient extension is used to represent
an approximate 10-year capture zone for flow within the fractured Prairie du Chien
aquifer. A 1-year-year time-of-travel zone was also delineated for both porous-flow and
fracture-flow systems and represents the Emergency Response Area.
2.Hydrologic flow boundaries – The St. Croix River and Mississippi River represents the
major flow boundaries for the Prairie du Chien aquifer in the northeast metropolitan area.
Hydrologic flow boundaries included in the groundwater model are documented in greater
detail in the technical report for the Metropolitan Model (Metropolitan Council, 2014).
3.Daily volume – Projected annual pumping volumes for the Centerville wells are shown in
Table 2. The maximum projected annual pumping volumes were converted to cubic
meters per day in order to be applied to the groundwater model.
4.Groundwater flow field – The groundwater flow field was calculated by the groundwater
flow model. Original model calibration and ambient flow-field simulation results are
described in the technical report for the Metropolitan Model (Metropolitan Council,
2009). Model calibration remains relatively unchanged, since the only significant updates
to the model are updates to the wells and their pumping rates, and small-scale changes to
hydraulic conductivity and aquifer thickness near the Centerville well field. These
changes were not enough to significantly impact calibration results.
5.Aquifer transmissivity – Aquifer transmissivity for regional model was established by
the Metropolitan Council’s calculations for the 2014 update to the Metropolitan Model.
To refine transmissivity for the Centerville area, the aquifer pumping test from Centerville
Well 2 was utilized. This test was conducted by the MDH in March 1998 for the purposes
of wellhead protection planning. Transmissivity for the Prairie du Chien aquifer was
calculated based on a 24-hour aquifer pumping and recovery test. The results of the test
7
2
indicated transmissivity values of 15,000 ft/day for the Prairie du Chien aquifer. Using
the observed Prairie du Chien thickness of 102 feet at Well 2, hydraulic conductivity is
estimated to be 147 ft/day.
An aquifer test plan was submitted to the MDH proposing the above values for use in the
amended plan delineations. Since there is uncertainty over how much the hydraulic
conductivity changes in the area, conductivity was varied by 50% in the model (both
increased and decreased) to account for the plausible range in values.
C. Quality and Quantity of Water Supplying the Public Water Supply Well - Water in the
City of Centerville water distribution system is regularly sampled and analyzed for
contaminants regulated under the federal Safe Drinking Water Act. Routine monitoring by the
Public Water Supply Program at MDH does not indicate contamination that may pose a public
health risk. No contaminants of significant concern have been detected in the City’s wells,
however the relatively high tritium concentration does indicate the Prairie du Chien aquifer
may have some vulnerability to contamination.
The Prairie du Chien and Jordan aquifers appears to have sufficient transmissivity and
recharge to remain a long-term source of drinking water for the residents of Centerville. No
additional wells are planned for Centerville over the next ten years, even though annual
increases in water demand are expected over this period to accommodate growth. Well 2 has
sufficient capacity to accommodate this increased growth. Monitoring of water levels within
the aquifer in the region will help observe the long-term sustainability of the aquifers as
surrounding communities continue to develop. Water level data collected in the Centerville
wells will contribute to the understanding of groundwater sustainability.
D. The Land Uses in the Drinking Water Supply Management Area – Land uses in the
DWSMA (Drinking Water Supply Management Area) for the Centerville wells is primarily
residential and commercial, with some open space and agricultural land uses. Land uses will
be discussed in greater detail in the amended Part 2 Wellhead Protection Plan, which will
include the contaminant source inventory for parcels within the DWSMA.
8
CHAPTER TWO
WELLHEAD PROTECTION AREA AND DRINKING WATER SUPPLY MANAGEMENT
AREA DELINEATION (4720.5205)
Physical setting and subsurface hydrogeology– The Centerville municipal wells draw water
fromthe Prairie du Chien and Jordan aquifers. Groundwater flow and the hydrogeologic setting
are described in City of Centerville Wellhead Protection Plan, Part 1 (MDH, 2001).A discussion
of hydrogeologic conditions across the full model domain is presented in the reportTwin Cities
Metropolitan Area Regional Groundwater Flow Model Version 3.00(Metropolitan Council,
2014).
Delineation of the Wellhead Protection Area
Porous FlowDelineation Method
The delineation of the porous-flow aquifercapture zones was conducted utilizing the
modified Metropolitan Model. Original model construction detail, data files, and calibration
results are outlined in the Metropolitan Council report (2014). Modifications to the model
included:
Refinement of the model grid was doneto reduce model grid size from500 x
500 meters to 7.81 x 7.81 meters around the Centerville municipal wells.
Updating modeled flow rates for Centerville municipal well to match
wellheadprotection rule requirements. Modeled rates are shown in Table 2.
Updating average modeled flow rates for nearby high capacity wells (both
2012 to 2016.
municipal and private) to reflect the period from
The Prairie du Chien (layer 3) parameters around the Centerville wells was
adjusted to match local values, as determined fromnearby aquifer tests.
Horizontal hydraulic conductivity was adjusted to 147 ft/day (44.8 m/day) in the
Prairie du Chien aquifer. Additional model runs were completed with a 50%
increase and 50% decrease of hydraulic conductivity as part of the uncertainty
analysis.
A global porosity of 0.056 was chosen to represent the Prairie du Chien aquifer.
The Jordan aquifer was modeled with a porosity of 0.20.
The thickness of the Prairie du Chien aquifer was changed to 102 feet around the
Centerville wells to reflect the observed values. The thickness ofthe Jordan
aquifer was modeled as 89 feet.
Calibration of the modified Metropolitan Model was checked using target wells located in
Layer 3 (Prairie du Chien aquifer) and Layer 4 (Jordan aquifer). Calibration results are
presented in Appendix B for the area in the immediate vicinity of the City of Centerville.
Calibration results showed a Root Mean Squared Error of 3.47m and a calculated mean
deviation of -1.96. Calibration results are consistent with the original Metro Model 3.00.
Thedelineations were created using particle trackinganalysis in MODPATH. A circle of
particles was established at a radius of 15 meters from each wellhead and tracking
backwards(upgradient) with 0 particle lines per well. MODPATH was set to have four
release points between 0.2 and 1.0 offset. The path line groupings were then outlined to
develop capture zonesfor 1-year and 10-year time-of-travel delineations.
Figure 1 shows the outlined result of the delineation effort.
9
2.Fracture Flow Delineation Method – Prairie du Chien Aquifer
Since the Prairie du Chien aquifer is capable of rapidly transmitting water through its
secondary porosity features (fractures and solution cavities), an additional delineation effort
was required to account for this flow. The Minnesota Department of Health has developed a
guidance for delineating the fracture flow component to the delineation of wells in this type
of setting. The methodology is outlined in greater detail in Guidance for Delineating
Wellhead Protection Areas in Fractured and Solution-Weathered Bedrock in Minnesota
(Minnesota Department of Health, December 2011).
Since Well 2 is fully completed within the Prairie du Chien aquifer, the first step of the
process was to delineate a fixed radius capture zone for the Prairie du Chien aquifer around
Wells 2. Table 5 shows the values used to create the fixed radius calculation, using the
MDH’s guidance for fracture flow delineations. A 1-year fixed radius and a 5-year fixed
radius (with a 5-year upgradient extension) was calculated. The results are shown in Table 5.
Sine only one well was being calculated for the fracture flow analysis, no overlap
calculations with nearby wells were required. A 5-year upgradient extensions was added to
represent a 10-year capture area. The angle of the ugradient extension was based on observed
groundwater flow direction. The upgradient extension was then varied 10 degrees in either
direction of the flow gradient (90 degrees from North), to account for possible uncertainties
regarding flow direction. The fixed radius delineations and their upgradient extensions were
combined to create a composite fracture-flow delineation area for the Prairie du Chien
bedrock, as shown in Figure 2. This is the area that, combined with the 10-year porous flow
area delineated in Figure 1, will serve as the groundwater capture zone for the Centerville
well. The composite 10-year groundwater capture area is shown on Figure 3, which
represents the wellhead protection area (WHPA). A composite 1-year capture zone was also
created and displayed on Figure 3, known as the emergency response area (ERA).
C.Uncertainties relating to the accuracy of the calculated wellhead protection area boundaries
Using computer models to simulate ground-water flow necessarily involves representing a
complicated natural system in a simplified manner. These simplifications are a result of
incomplete knowledge or understanding of part of the natural system and the limitations of
mathematical models implemented in groundwater modeling computer codes. The necessary
simplifications give rise to uncertainty in the model results. A reasonable attempt to account for
the most significant causes of model uncertainty was made in the delineation of the WHPA. The
technical report for the Metropolitan Model (Metropolitan Council, 2014) outlines some of the
model uncertainties that exist within the original MODFLOW model. Wherever possible, locally
obtained values of hydraulic conductivity were used to more accurately represent conditions in
and around the Centerville wells.
The main uncertainty which would have the greatest impact on the size and shape of the
delineated capture zone is the hydraulic conductivity in the Prairie du Chien aquifer. Conductivity
can vary greatly in this aquifer, sometimes over short distances, based on the number of fractures
and solution cavities that are present. The bedrock matrix itself is not highly permeable, so the
presence of fractures and cavities is essential for high capacity production wells. The aquifer
pumping test conducted at Well 2 in 1998 offers an excellent base value for modeling the
wellhead protection capture zone. To account for the potential variability of the hydraulic
conductivity around the well, two additional model runs were conducted for the capture zone
analysis. One model run increased the conductivity by 50%, while the other model run decreased
the conductivity by 50%. A composite of all three model runs was used to create the porous
10
capture zone displayed on Figure 1.
D.Delineation of the DWSMA
The Wellhead Protection area (WHPA) is shown on Figure 3. This area includes a combination of
the porous-flow wellhead protection areas and the fracture-flow wellhead protection area. The
Drinking Water Supply Management Area (DWSMA) was delineated using a combination of
parcel boundaries, street and road centerlines, and municipal boundaries. Any parcel of land
either wholly or partially within one of the delineation areas was included within the DWSMA.
The DWSMA represents the area of land that will be considered during the creation of the
updated management plan for Part 2. The vulnerability of the DWSMA is discussed in Chapter 3
of this report.
11
CHAPTER THREE
VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT
This chapter documents the vulnerability assessments of the wells and drinking water supply
management area (DWSMA) for the City of Centerville wells listed in Table 1. This assessment was
performed in accordance with rules (Minnesota Rule 4720.5210) for preparing and implementing
wellhead protection measures for public water supply wells.
The vulnerabilities of the wells were determined by evaluating available information on the 1) geology,
2)well construction, 3) pumping rates, and 3) chemical composition of the well water and comparing
these results with the criteria in Minnesota Rule 4720.5550.
The vulnerability of the DWSMA was determined by evaluating available information on 1) the lateral
continuity of protective geologic materials overlying the aquifer and 2) the chemical and isotopic
composition of well water from the aquifer. DWSMA vulnerability was calculated using a combination
of the Anoka County Geologic Atlas, observed confining layers from well log data, and available
geochemistry data.
A.Well vulnerability assessment - A vulnerability score was calculated for each well based on
factors such as well construction, geology at the well site, and chemical data; higher scores
correlate to greater perceived vulnerability. A numeric cutoff (of 45 points) is used to identify
vulnerable from non-vulnerable wells (MDH, 1997). Vulnerable wells are also identified based
on the presence of contamination, such as nitrate-nitrogen in excess of 10 mg/l, or young (post-
1953) water, as indicated by the presence of 1 tritium unit or greater in the well water. The
completed well vulnerability assessment worksheets are provided in Appendix C.
Well 1, which is an emergency use well, was calculated to be non-vulnerable based on a tritium
sample from 1997 that indicated tritium was below the detection limit of 0.8 TU. This indicates
that water in Well 1 is more than 60 years old. This sample result overrode the worksheet score
of 45 which would have normally resulted in a vulnerable classification.
Well 2, the City’s primary well, was scored at 30 points, which would normally indicate a non-
vulnerable well. However, the tritium sample indicated a concentration of 2.6 TU, showing that
some portion of the water supplying Well 2 is relatively young. Therefore, the well was given a
“vulnerable” ranking.
There is nothing that was discovered in the well vulnerability assessment that indicates that the
wells themselves are a likely avenue for contamination to reach the aquifer. The wells appear to
meet construction standards set forth in the State Well Code. Well vulnerability in Centerville is
mostly indicative of overall aquifer vulnerability.
B.Drinking Water Supply Management Area Vulnerability Assessment - The vulnerability of
groundwater underlying the land parcels located within the DWSMA for Centerville was
evaluated primarily on the basis of the geologic sensitivity, as determined from the Anoka
County Geologic Atlas (Minnesota Geologic Survey, 2013, and Minnesota Department of
Natural Resource, 2016) and well records in County Well Index. Geologic cross-sections in the
atlas that run east west through Centerville in the area of the DWSMA indicate of thick layer of
till and sandy till overlying bedrock.
For a refined look at confining layers, an L-score analysis was conducted to look for clay or
other confining layers in local well logs, concentrating only on confining units that are above
the Prairie du Chien aquifer. For each 10 feet of continuous confining geology, an L-Score of
“1” unit is applied. A well with an L-score of 4, for example, has at least 40 feet of confining
12
materials between the land surface and the aquifer. Wells with an L-score of 1 and above are
considered to have low geologic sensitivity. Wells with an L-score of “0” require examination
of other details to determine sensitivity, including looking for potential confining units that
might be classified as “sandy clay” or look for bedrock layers that are confining, such as the
basal St. Peter sandstone. In these cases, a “moderate” geologic sensitivity is assigned. Wells
with no evidence of geologic confining units are assigned a “high” geologic sensitivity. Figure 4
shows the geologic sensitivity of wells mapped within the Centerville DWSMA. Of the 313
wells mapped in and around the DWSMA, 293 wells (or approximately 94%) were assigned a
low geologic sensitivity. Moderate geologic sensitivity was assigned to 19 wells, with high
sensitivity assigned to only one well. The findings of the L-score analysis suggest that the
Centerville DWSMA is largely low in geologic sensitivity.
A second aspect of the DWSMA vulnerability assessment is to look at water chemistry data for
indicators of the aquifer being recharged by younger water. The tritium reading of 2.6 TU from
Well 2 in 2011 indicates that younger water is reaching the Prairie du Chien aquifer in the
vicinity of Well 2. Elevated tritium increases the designated vulnerability of the DWSMA. In
this case, the “low” vulnerability based on geologic sensitivity is increased to “moderate”
vulnerability based on the tritium results.
Figure 4 shows the designated “moderate” vulnerability designation for Centerville’s DWSMA.
The implications of the assigned vulnerability level will be addressed in greater detail in the
amended Part 2 Wellhead Protection Plan. In general, moderate vulnerability rankings will
necessitate a thorough inventory of all wells that penetrate the geologic confining layers, along
with an inventory storage tanks that contain high concentrations of potential pollutants.
C.Recommendations – Assessing vulnerability requires periodic sampling for age dating
compounds and potential contaminants to ensure that the water meets established standards and
that the designated vulnerability levels are appropriate. The following steps could help in
establishing more accurate vulnerability designations for future plan updates:
a.Examine possible avenues for younger water to reach the Prairie du Chien aquifer
through Well 2. If Well 2 is rehabilitated over the course of the next ten years, it is
recommended that a video camera survey be conducted, looking for possible casing
breaches or leaks that could be allowing younger water to reach the aquifer. Video
inspections are standard for many well rehabilitation projects.
b.Request that the MDH collect their standard assessment monitoring package of water
quality samples from Well 2 by the fifth year of plan implementation. This sampling
includes tritium, nitrates, ammonia, sulfate, chloride, and bromide. This sample will
help determine if the previous sample result remains consistent.
13
REFERENCES
Metropolitan Council, Twin Cities Metropolitan Area Regional Groundwater Flow Model Version
3.00,May 2014.
Minnesota Department of Health, Assessing Well and Aquifer Vulnerability for Wellhead Protection,
February 1997.
Minnesota Department of Health, City of Centerville Wellhead Protection Plan, Part 1,May 2001.
Minnesota Department of Health and Minnesota Geological Survey, Minnesota County Well Index,
Version 4.00.
Minnesota Department of Health, Guidance for Delineating Wellhead Protection Areas in Fractured
and Solution-Weathered Bedrock in Minnesota, December 2011.
Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, Geologic Atlas of Anoka County, Minnesota, County
Atlas Series C-27 (Part B, Hydrogeology), James A. Berg, 2016.
Minnesota Geological Survey, Geologic Atlas of Anoka County, Minnesota, County Atlas Series C-27
(Part A), Dale Setterholm, April 2013.
Minnesota Geological Survey, Bedrock Geology and Structure of the Seven-County Twin Cities
Metropolitan Area, Minnesota, 2000.
14
TABLES
Xfmm!Wvmofsbcjmjuz+
Zfbs
Cvjmu
)gffu*
Kpsebo
Uijdloftt
)gffu*
Dijfo
Qsbjsjf!ev!
Uijdloftt
Xfmm
)gffu*
Efqui
)gffu*
Efqui
Dbtjoh
)jo*
Dbtjoh
Ejbnfufs
Brvjgfs
VUN!O!
6112192PQED!)Qsbjsjf!ev!Dijfo*31!y!25212298213volopxo2::4Wvmofsbcmf
Dppsejobuf
6
VUN!F!
Dppsejobuf
Xfmm!Tubuvt
Vojrvf
Ovncfs
Xfmm
Obnf
Xfmm!26221:2Fnfshfodz5:74776112697DKEO!)Kpsebo*29!y!23311378222882:99Opo.WvmofsbcmfXfmm!3623859Qsjnbsz5:748
UBCMF!2!.!DFOUFSWJMMF!XBUFS!TVQQMZ!XFMM!JOGPSNBUJPO
+!wvmofsbcjmjuz!tubuvt!cbtfe!po!sfwjfx!pg!xfmm!dpotusvdujpo-!hfpmphjd!nbufsjbmt!fodpvoufsfe!evsjoh!esjmmjoh-!xfmm!vtf-!boe!xbufs!rvbmjuz/
0ebz*
4
25
)n
Npefmfe
Qvnqjoh!Sbuf!
/
246/12512/124
)NH0Z*
Npefmfe
Bnfoenfou
Qvnqjoh!Sbuf!Vtfe!Gps!Qmbo!
34/1
215/1238/1
)NH0Z*
Npefmfe
Qvnqjoh
Wpmvnf!Vtfe!
Gps!3116!Qmbo!
)NH0Z*+
Qsfejdufe
3133!Qvnqjoh!
Sfdpsefe!Qvnqjoh!Wpmvnft!)NH0Z*
31233124312531263127
226/8224/6:6/::4/998/6247/1
Vojrvf
Ovncfs
Upubm
Xfmm
Obnf
Xfmm!26221:21/81/83/21/71/62/1Xfmm!3623859226/1223/9:4/9:4/398/1246/1
UBCMF!3;!DFOUFSWJMMF!XFMM!QVNQJOH!WPMVNFT
+Cbtfe!po!bo!ftujnbufe!tfswfe!qpqvmbujpo!pg!4846!boe!b!211!hbmmpo!qfs!dbqjub!xbufs!vtbhf!)dbmdvmbufe!jo!EOS!Xbufs!Tvqqmz!Qmbo*
0ebz*
4
)n
Npefmfe
Xjuiesbxbm
5/455/95/354/7
1/11/1
6:/4726/:
56/457:/999/4:26/::1/7:51/795/2983/829/1297/:
253/72591/4298/72:58/1
)NH0Z*
Bwfsbhf
3123.3127
Xjuiesbxbm
1/11/1
Sfqpsufe!Qvnqjoh!Wpmvnft!)NH0Z*+
6/45/65/25/24/75/95/55/55/24/4
96/:95/291/9:2/988/947/425/76/51/144/8
31233124312531263127
225/861/11/451/332/3244/767/534/741/663/6274/1259/8239/1265/8229/934:/32:7/429:/4::/7324/8223/2:3/684/494/:8:/6217/6:8/687/692/7:2/2
Dppse
VUN!O!
Dppse
VUN!F!
BrvjgfsXfmm!Vtf
Ovncfs
EOS!Qfsnju!
Xfmm!Obnf
351282Mjop!Mblft!Xfmm!22:96.7279PQDKNvojdjqbm5:42765:::95535:412Uxjo!Qjof!Npcjmf!Ipnf!Qbsl!33119.1865PQEDQsjwbuf!Xbufs!Tvqqmz6122496112722634:59Ivhp!Xfmm!32:86.7329PQDKNvojdjqbm5::6:25::9472665318Mjo
p!Mblft!Xfmm!52:96.7279PQDKNvojdjqbm5:89225::::3666:484Mjop!Mblft!Xfmm!42:96.7279PQDKNvojdjqbm5:44395:::2117655:8Ivhp!Xfmm!42:86.7329DKEONvojdjqbm6112966112247
35:411Uxjo!Qjof!Npcjmf!Ipnf!Qbsl!23119.1865PQEDQsjwbuf!Xbufs!Tvqqmz6118556112665782753Ivhp!Xfmm!52:86.7329DKEONvojdjqbm6116346112415797383Ivhp!Xfmm!62:86.7329DKEONvojdjqbm5::822611339783373:Mjop!Mblf
t!Xfmm!62:96.7279PQDKNvojdjqbm5:42295:::515878998Mjop!Mblft!Xfmm!72:96.7279PQDKNvojdjqbm5:41885::97:5
Vojrvf
Ovncfs
UBCMF!4!.!QFSNJUUFE!IJHI!DBQBDJUZ!XFMMT!XJUIJO!UXP!NJMFT!PG!DFOUFSWJMMF(T!NVOJDJQBM!XFMMT+Pcubjofe!gspn!EOS!NQBST!Ebubcbtf
Thickness
x
Thickness
s
lineations
ic Atlas
HP delineations
Hugo Well 6
,
Aquifer Test
Data SourceData Source
, Centerville Well 2 Aquifer
County Geologic AtlasCounty Geologic AtlasCounty Geologic AtlasCounty Geolog
Well Logs, County Well IndexWell Logs, County Well IndexWell Logs, County Well IndexWell Logs, County Well IndexWell Logs, County Well Index
Hugo Well 6
AnokaAnoka County Geologic AtlasAnoka County Geologic AtlasAnokaAnokaAnoka
Centerville Well Aquifer Test
CentervilleCenterville Well Logs, County Well IndexCenterville Well Logs, County Well IndexCenterville Well Logs, County Well IndeCentervilleCentervilleCentervilleCenterville
Standard MDH Porosity for WStandard MDH Porosity for WHP de
Hugo Well 6 Aquifer Test
Centerville Aquifer Test
/day
2
/day
2
ft
feetfeet
ft/day
feet
ft/day
ft
200
111 feet822 feet720 feet
---
0.0560.
ValueValue
Jordan
77
708631
0.3
ConfinedConfined
Dolomite
Sandstone
2
147.1
1830
102819708
15,000
Prairie du Chien
West Flow DirectionWest Flow Direction
eld
nement
ParameterParameter
Aquifer NameAquifer Name
Aquifer MaterialAquifer Material
Primary PorosityPrimary Porosity
Transmissivity (T)Transmissivity (T)
Aquifer ThicknessAquifer Thickness
Hydraulic ConductivityHydraulic Conductivity
Hydraulic ConfinementHydraulic Confi
Groundwater Flow FiGroundwater Flow Field
AQUIFER PARAMETERS, CITY OF CENTERVILLE
Stratigraphic Top ElevationStratigraphic Top Elevation
–
Stratigraphic Bottom ElevationStratigraphic Bottom Elevation
4
TABLE
TABLE 5 - CALCULATION OF FIXED RADIUS FOR PRAIRIE DU CHIEN FRACTURE FLOW ASSESSMENT
1-Year Calculated Fixed 5-Year Calculated Fixed
radiusradius
33
Pumping Rate (Q):1,401.0m/daym/day
1,401.0
Water Producing Zone Thickness (L):31.1m31.1m
Well No. 2 (512748)
Effective Porosity (n):0.0560.056
Calculated Radius:305.7m682.7m
FIGURES
APPENDIX A
CITY OF CENTERVILLEWELL LOGS
NJOOFTPUB!EFQBSUNFOU!PG!IFBMUI
3125014021
Vojrvf!Op/
116221:2Vqebuf!Ebuf
XFMM!BOE!CPSJOH!SFDPSE
Dpvouz!Obnf Boplb2::2015026
Fousz!Ebuf
Minnesota Statutes Chapter 1031
Xfmm!Efqui!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!Efqui!Dpnqmfufe!!!!!!!Ebuf!Xfmm!Dpnqmfufe
Upxotijq!Obnf!!!Upxotijq!!!Sbohf!!Ejs!!!!!!!Tfdujpo!!Tvctfdujpo
gu/gu/3782:99015032
414
X!!!!
!423325EDEEEC
Opo.tqfdjgjfe!Spubsz
Xfmm!ObnfEsjmmjoh!Nfuipe
DFOUFSWJMMF!2
Xfmm!Izespgsbduvsfe@
Esjmmjoh!Gmvje
ZftOp
Gspngu/
gu/!up
Cfoupojuf
Vtf!!dpnnvojuz!tvqqmz)nvojdjqbm*
Ipmf!Ejbnfufs
ZftO
Dbtjoh
Esjwf!Tipf@
1:6jo/!u
gu
Dbtjoh!Ejbnfufs!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!Xfjhiu)mct0gu*
1378jo/!u
gu
HFPMPHJDBM!NBUFSJBM!!!!!!DPMPS!!IBSEOFTT!!!!!GSPN!!!UP
u82
29:6jo/!ug
UPQTPJM!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!CMBDL
13
23311jo/!ugu61
GJOF!EJSUZ!TBOE!XJUI!DMCSPX
323
TBOEZ!DMBZ!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!CMVF!!
2373
TBOE!'!HSBWFM!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!WBSJF
7382
gu/
Tdsffo!Gspngu/!up378
O Pqfo!Ipmf 311
TBOE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!SFE!!!!
82:4
NblfUzqf!
SPDL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!CSPX
:4261
WPJE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
261263
SPDL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!CSPX
263291
SPDL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
291311
Mboe!tvsgbdfEbuf2:99015032
Tubujd!Xbufs!Mfwfm25gu/!gspn
SPDL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
311315
QVNQJOH!MFWFM!)cfmpx!mboe!tvsgbdf*
ist/!!qvnqjohh/q/n/
92/524716gu/!bgufs
SPDL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
315319
Xfmm!Ifbe!Dpnqmfujpo
TBOETUPOF!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
319364
Qjumftt!bebqufs!ngs
Npefm
TBOETUPOF!X0MFOTFT!PG
364376
Dbtjoh!Qspufdujpo
23!jo/!bcpwf!hsbef
TIBMF!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
376378
Bu.hsbef)Fowjsponfoubm!Xfmmt!boe!Cpsjoht!POMZ*
Op
Xfmm!hspvufe@!Zft
Hspvujoh!Jogpsnbujpo
MFOTFT!PG!TBOETUPOF!'!
378392
Nbufsjbm!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!Gspn!!Up!)gu/*!!!!Bnpvou)zet0cbht*
TBOEZ!TIBMF!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!HSFF
3923:4
H4/6Z1:6
TIBMF!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!HSFF
H21Z1311
3:4414
Ofbsftu!Lopxo!Tpvsdf!pg!Dpoubnjobujpo
uzqf
gu/ejsfdujpo
Xfmm!ejtjogfdufe!vqpo!dpnqmfujpo@ZftOp
Opu!Jotubmmfe
Qvnq
Ebuf!Jotubmmfe
O
Ngs!obn
NpefmWpmut
IQ
1
h/q/n
Espq!Qjqf!MfohuiDbqbdjuz
gu/
SFNBSLT-!FMFWBUJPO-!TPVSDF!PG!EBUB-!fud/
Uzqf
HBNNB!MPHHFE!4.34.2:99/!N/H/T/!OP/!
3918/!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Boz!opu!jo!vtf!boe!opu!tfbmfe!xfmm)t*!po!qspqfsuz@Op
Zft
ZftOp
Xbt!b!wbsjbodf!hsboufe!gspn!uif!NEI!gps!uijt!Xfmm@
:23
VTHT!Rvbe
Dfoufswjmmf
Fmfwbujpo
Mjd/!Ps!!Sfh/!Op/:2464
Xfmm!DPOUSBDUPS!DFSUJGJDBUJPO
Brvjgfs;
PQDK2131147T12
Bmu!Je;
Mjdfotf!Cvtjoftt!Obnf!
Obnf!pg!Esjmmfs
IFKUNBOFL-!E/
Sfqpsu!Dpqz
IF.12316.17!)Sfw/!:0:7*
NJOOFTPUB!EFQBSUNFOU!PG!IFBMUI
3125014021
Vojrvf!Op/
11623859Vqebuf!Ebuf
XFMM!BOE!CPSJOH!SFDPSE
Dpvouz!Obnf Boplb2::4016017
Fousz!Ebuf
Njooftpub!Tubuvuft!Dibqufs!2142
Xfmm!Efqui!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!Efqui!Dpnqmfufe!!!!!!!Ebuf!Xfmm!Dpnqmfufe
Upxotijq!Obnf!!!Upxotijq!!!Sbohf!!Ejs!!!!!!!Tfdujpo!!Tvctfdujpo
gu/gu/2982::4012033
298
X!!!!
!423334BDBBEC
Dbcmf!Uppm
Xfmm!ObnfEsjmmjoh!Nfuipe
DFOUFSWJMMF!3
Xfmm!Izespgsbduvsfe@
Esjmmjoh!Gmvje
Dpoubdu(t!Obnf
ZftOp
27:5!TPSFM!!TU
Gspngu/
gu/!up
Xbufs
DFOUFSWJMMF!!NO!!66149
Vtf!!dpnnvojuz!tvqqmz)nvojdjqbm*
Ipmf!Ejbnfufs
ZftO
Dbtjoh
Esjwf!Tipf@
1263jo/!u
gu
Dbtjoh!Ejbnfufs!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!Xfjhiu)mct0gu*
1298jo/!u
gu
HFPMPHJDBM!NBUFSJBM!!!!!!DPMPS!!IBSEOFTT!!!!!GSPN!!!UP
u89/7
3198jo/!ug
UPQ!TPJM!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!CMBDL
TPGU!!!!!!!!!!!!19
25212jo/!ugu65/68
TBOEZ!DMBZ!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!HSBZ!!
TPGU!!!!!!!!!!!!929
T.DMBZ0TUPOFT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!HSBZ!!
TPGU!!!!!!!!!!!!2971
HSBWFM!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!WBSJF
NFEJVN!!!!!!!7173
gu/
Tdsffo!Gspngu/!up298
O Pqfo!Ipmf 94
TBOE0HSBWFM!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!WBSJF
TPGU!!!!!!!!!!!!7386
NblfUzqf!
TBOE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!CSPX
TPGU!!!!!!!!!!!!8694
TIBLPQFF!EPMPNJUF!!!!!!!!QOL0U
IBSE!!!!!!!!!!!!94296
KPSEBO!TBOETUPOF!!!!!!!!!CSPX
TPGU!!!!!!!!!!!!296298
Mboe!tvsgbdfEbuf2::301:036
Tubujd!Xbufs!Mfwfm9gu/!gspn
QVNQJOH!MFWFM!)cfmpx!mboe!tvsgbdf*
ist/!!qvnqjohh/q/n/
38gu/!bgufs2341
Xfmm!Ifbe!Dpnqmfujpo
Qjumftt!bebqufs!ngs
CBLFS!!!!!!!Npefm9QT252!!!!
Dbtjoh!Qspufdujpo
O23!jo/!bcpwf!hsbef
Bu.hsbef)Fowjsponfoubm!Xfmmt!boe!Cpsjoht!POMZ*
Op
Xfmm!hspvufe@!Zft
Hspvujoh!Jogpsnbujpo
Nbufsjbm!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!Gspn!!Up!)gu/*!!!!Bnpvou)zet0cbht*
Z31T1212
Ofbsftu!Lopxo!Tpvsdf!pg!Dpoubnjobujpo
uzqf
gu/ejsfdujpo
Xfmm!ejtjogfdufe!vqpo!dpnqmfujpo@ZftOp
Opu!Jotubmmfe
Qvnq
Ebuf!Jotubmmfe
Z
Ngs!obn
HPVME!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Wpmut
Npefm571
21SKND!!!!!!!IQ61
h/q/n
Espq!Qjqf!MfohuiDbqbdjuz
gu/F,14
74
SFNBSLT-!FMFWBUJPO-!TPVSDF!PG!EBUB-!fud/
Uzqf
T
TF!DPSOFS!TIBE!'!NBJO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Boz!opu!jo!vtf!boe!opu!tfbmfe!xfmm)t*!po!qspqfsuz@Op
Zft
ZftOp
Xbt!b!wbsjbodf!hsboufe!gspn!uif!NEI!gps!uijt!Xfmm@
:16
VTHT!Rvbe
Dfoufswjmmf
Fmfwbujpo
Mjd/!Ps!!Sfh/!Op/82126
Xfmm!DPOUSBDUPS!DFSUJGJDBUJPO
Brvjgfs;
PQDK2131147T13
Bmu!Je;
Mjdfotf!Cvtjoftt!Obnf!
Obnf!pg!Esjmmfs
LPXBMJL-!K/!!
Sfqpsu!Dpqz
IF.12316.17!)Sfw/!:0:7*
APPENDIX B
MODEL CALIBRATION RESULTS
LAYER 3LAYER 4
OBSERVED HEADS
CENTERVILLE MODEL 8 -SMALL SCALE CALIBRATION
250255260265270275280285290295300
300295290285280275270265260255250
MODELED HEADS
CENTERVILLE - WELLHEAD PROTECTION MODEL RUN 8 - SMALL SCALE CALIBRATION RESULTS
NameXYRowColumnLayerGroupZoneObservedComputedResidual
cwi_1070034976965000527248325311273.4056275.9869-2.58127
cwi_1071114939905005758167254311270.6624271.773-1.11063
cwi_1074434974824997896266323311277.368275.56191.806104
cwi_1103365029115002117188346311282.5496282.7735-0.2239
cwi_1103384918464997696267245311263.3472270.5328-7.18564
cwi_1103394917094997656267245311263.9568270.4894-6.53264
cwi_1103414918584997927266245311266.0904270.4872-4.39685
cwi_1124715016144997087270343311280.416281.1076-0.69155
cwi_1125204905494998747263242311265.176269.8723-4.69628
cwi_1125235027234996306273345311275.844282.8392-6.9952
cwi_1126145007595000144253340311272.1864280.1634-7.977
cwi_1126445018795003789175344311281.0256281.8365-0.81092
cwi_1126734975514997915266324311277.0632275.65891.404292
cwi_1126965016024996986270343311280.416281.0664-0.65036
cwi_1187454907455004983170242311271.5768273.1023-1.52546
cwi_1216534929205004003174250311270.0528270.0370.015766
cwi_1243574905584998616264242311263.0424269.9081-6.8657
cwi_1268674955465000469249265311270.9672272.823-1.85585
cwi_1268714903705004336173241311268.224273.24-5.01599
cwi_1268764954755001709195264311270.6624272.2961-1.63365
cwi_1276144945214999029262257311267.6144272.0421-4.42765
cwi_1279124903855004997170242311270.6624273.2551-2.59269
cwi_1308535017104998572264343311281.0256281.3943-0.36866
cwi_1319054952585000788243263311270.0528272.342-2.2892
cwi_1319144907694996887270242311266.3952270.231-3.83583
cwi_1343024947935004469172259311270.3576271.4161-1.05849
cwi_1343044968945004390172316311269.748274.267-4.51895
cwi_1353624993514997495268334311278.2824277.7490.533352
cwi_1353895024035004078174345311281.3304282.565-1.23465
cwi_1367594962435001115220281311269.4432273.4324-3.98919
cwi_1367644903374998127265241311271.272269.94581.326242
cwi_1381044905054998501264242311265.4808269.9268-4.44601
cwi_1381085020324998658263344311282.8544281.79611.058281
cwi_1381165009065002254185341311279.5016280.4522-0.95064
cwi_1382555015534997334269343311282.5496281.05661.493032
cwi_1383535006035000071254339311281.0256279.96531.06027
cwi_1383625014655003964174343311281.3304281.3606-0.03016
cwi_1392944968754997858267315311274.32274.7523-0.43232
cwi_1420404904814997274269242311266.0904270.092-4.00155
cwi_1457654919574997679267246311267.6144270.5774-2.963
cwi_1497714903675001167215241311269.1384269.3275-0.18913
cwi_1509214919564997875267246311263.652270.5335-6.88148
cwi_1509344912344997440268243311265.176270.349-5.17295
cwi_1517154992345001582199334311274.32278.1979-3.87787
cwi_1517854907854996856271242311265.7856270.2401-4.45449
cwi_1532084910004997589268243311267.0048270.2417-3.23689
cwi_1532215019344998653263344311275.844281.6734-5.82939
cwi_1532304918204997848267245311267.3096270.4914-3.1818
cwi_1534584918804997674267246311270.6624270.54970.11267
cwi_1534604978395000604247326311277.0632276.20640.856797
cwi_1558654949525001806193260311271.272271.5841-0.31206
cwi_1558754976224997988266324311275.2344275.7693-0.53493
Page 1 of 8
CENTERVILLE - WELLHEAD PROTECTION MODEL RUN 8 - SMALL SCALE CALIBRATION RESULTS
NameXYRowColumnLayerGroupZoneObservedComputedResidual
cwi_1561074908585005116170242311269.4432273.0977-3.65448
cwi_1618305008975002197186341311277.6728280.4309-2.75809
cwi_1621154917154997777267245311262.128270.4686-8.34059
cwi_1621185008215002376184340311281.94280.36471.575265
cwi_1621574995934996883270335311280.416278.07222.343823
cwi_1621934906854998492264242311264.5664269.9713-5.40495
cwi_1622124917544997618268245311268.224270.5133-2.28929
cwi_1622404906864998744263242311264.2616269.8992-5.63764
cwi_1632714959065002669182272311270.9672272.8697-1.90246
cwi_1637185008075001821192340311275.2344280.2575-5.02306
cwi_1637565020084999266260344311281.0256281.702-0.67635
cwi_1637714994274997872267335311281.0256277.8253.200634
cwi_1637764917264997905266245311268.5288270.4458-1.917
cwi_1637804919154997707267246311269.4432270.5563-1.11308
cwi_1647564905504998463264242311267.6144269.9441-2.32974
cwi_1647774905974998373265242311267.6144269.9735-2.35913
cwi_1647994906594998386264242311267.9192269.9873-2.06812
cwi_1692604904444997737267242311268.224270.0312-1.80719
cwi_1706184960475001714195274311272.1864273.2364-1.05002
cwi_1706964960325001764193274311273.7104273.21010.500325
cwi_1739574904414998425264242311267.0048269.9265-2.92165
cwi_1739984907705005588168242311273.7104273.31880.391606
cwi_1750384977774996971270326311274.9296275.6972-0.7676
cwi_1760534905685005320169242311270.9672273.279-2.31176
cwi_1760804923774999012262248311264.5664270.2333-5.66691
cwi_1760944964015001340207297311273.4056273.7743-0.36875
cwi_1760964964065001415204297311273.4056273.8149-0.40929
cwi_1760974964085001472202298311274.0152273.83620.178986
cwi_1779015014165004655171343311279.3492281.3883-2.03909
cwi_1781724960245001245210274311272.796273.2035-0.40749
cwi_1782614948975000582247260311268.5288271.8615-3.33272
cwi_1791754921155004057174246311267.9192270.9149-2.99568
cwi_1808054963975001408204296311272.796273.7964-1.00041
cwi_1808424903355003562176241311272.4912272.7659-0.27475
cwi_1821495018334998053266343311281.6352281.53040.104849
cwi_1822314911695005688167243311270.3576273.2614-2.90376
cwi_1826584969154997989266316311278.2824274.8223.460434
cwi_1826814983785002169187331311277.0632277.05920.00396
cwi_1827104909134998602264243311269.748269.9978-0.24984
cwi_1827114909584998624264243311269.748270.0014-0.25344
cwi_1828065009975002723182341311279.8064280.6527-0.84635
cwi_1828214908424998537264242311267.0048270.0011-2.9963
cwi_1864994904005003897174242311271.5768273.0269-1.45005
cwi_1944544903335004236173241311271.5768273.2506-1.67383
cwi_1944624956435001906191267311274.0152272.52941.485752
cwi_1956294910054998441264243311266.7270.0732-3.37321
cwi_1956724909764998573264243311264.2616270.0242-5.76261
cwi_1999034906955004198173242311270.3576273.0504-2.69279
cwi_2067074904054996636271242311267.0048270.0979-3.09305
cwi_2085195001005005448168337311272.1864279.9476-7.76121
cwi_2085264993764997757267335311280.7208277.77022.950587
cwi_2089904955225001983190265311270.0528272.334-2.28117
Page 2 of 8
CENTERVILLE - WELLHEAD PROTECTION MODEL RUN 8 - SMALL SCALE CALIBRATION RESULTS
NameXYRowColumnLayerGroupZoneObservedComputedResidual
cwi_2496615002444999987255338311280.7208279.49561.225168
cwi_4015684906595003925174242311269.1384272.9251-3.78668
cwi_4015934993585003916174334311276.7584278.7223-1.96394
cwi_4041555011745001898191342311281.3304280.72530.605112
cwi_4041925011785001895191342311279.8064280.7297-0.92326
cwi_4042014918895000167253246311268.8336269.6724-0.83885
cwi_4042054909254998469264243311264.8712270.0438-5.17257
cwi_4042064909254998431264243311264.8712270.053-5.1818
cwi_4042194909704998608264243311269.1384270.0101-0.87173
cwi_4042254910034998428264243311269.4432270.0759-0.6327
cwi_4042344909694998553264243311270.9672270.02950.93767
cwi_4042824910964998391264243311265.7856270.1119-4.32628
cwi_4047774908144998567264242311256.9464269.984-13.0376
cwi_4057584904564997485268242311267.0048270.0636-3.05882
cwi_4070855015694999342260343311281.6352281.1520.48318
cwi_4070924918864997623268246311270.3576270.5619-0.20429
cwi_4096694909314998507264243311269.1384270.0355-0.89707
cwi_4096704908984998537264243311264.2616270.0162-5.75455
cwi_4116134911704998375265243311263.9568270.1426-6.18584
cwi_4116144908264998437264242311261.2136270.0235-8.80988
cwi_4116244910295002518183243311265.176269.804-4.62802
cwi_4126114910085005721167243311272.1864273.3199-1.13355
cwi_4135824982534998984262330311274.32276.6623-2.34232
cwi_4166504915665003733175244311269.748270.8993-1.15133
cwi_4178794909684998655263243311268.224269.9929-1.76885
cwi_4185754909214998544264243311266.7270.0199-3.31992
cwi_4187984908744998612264242311267.0048269.9846-2.97982
cwi_4193604924145004231173248311269.1384270.8722-1.73377
cwi_4203355018924998075266344311280.7208281.6105-0.88972
cwi_4203514918885000263252246311265.7856269.6457-3.86007
cwi_4212194908484998622264242311268.224269.9748-1.75081
cwi_4232524911144998380264243311270.6624270.11990.542488
cwi_4233364910234998440264243311265.4808270.0786-4.59776
cwi_4238054980644996917270328311280.416276.06624.349841
cwi_4238364992965001314207334311279.0444278.26740.777014
cwi_4257114959065002026189272311271.272272.996-1.72397
cwi_4260814967604997699267314311276.1488274.58191.566921
cwi_4276185007714996621272340311278.892279.8272-0.93521
cwi_4276805001354999971255338311279.5016279.34870.152894
cwi_4285004976465000171253325311275.844275.81240.031627
cwi_4285154910354998486264243311265.176270.0703-4.89434
cwi_4285164911154998554264243311267.3096270.0678-2.75824
cwi_4285184911744998478264243311265.176270.1188-4.94278
cwi_4296524956365001846192267311270.9672272.5104-1.54317
cwi_4296804989194997888266333311279.1968277.0952.10176
cwi_4296944989104999786256333311270.0528277.6424-7.58961
cwi_4303664988824999685257333311276.4536277.5912-1.13758
cwi_4305224976984997687267325311275.5392275.8242-0.28499
cwi_4305284967124997534268313311270.3576274.4897-4.13212
cwi_4309464911144998399264243311269.748270.115-0.36698
cwi_4314794912794998688263243311266.7270.0787-3.37865
cwi_4316394910325004892170243311270.6624272.8985-2.23608
Page 3 of 8
CENTERVILLE - WELLHEAD PROTECTION MODEL RUN 8 - SMALL SCALE CALIBRATION RESULTS
NameXYRowColumnLayerGroupZoneObservedComputedResidual
cwi_4329634924675004757171248311273.7104271.57172.13867
cwi_4329744921995004223173247311271.8816271.04220.83937
cwi_4329754922125004226173247311271.5768271.03450.542271
cwi_4329834921535004196173247311270.9672271.0496-0.08239
cwi_4351465030534998629263346311287.4264283.21094.215501
cwi_4352884904935003891174242311270.6624272.9895-2.3271
cwi_4365574968234997790267315311277.368274.67752.690511
cwi_4365774970084998188265318311276.1488274.96241.186406
cwi_4376714967645003188178314311274.32274.4568-0.13676
cwi_4391054990625004842171333311276.4536278.5725-2.11893
cwi_4391094991505004523172334311276.4536278.618-2.16437
cwi_4391704956035002072188266311268.8336272.461-3.62743
cwi_4391894909994996664271243311264.2616270.3547-6.09312
cwi_4391914909574998689263243311266.0904269.9782-3.88775
cwi_4392314959785001540200273311270.3576273.1197-2.76211
cwi_4400045000105000012254337311280.7208279.18531.535529
cwi_4400265017234998758263343311282.8544281.40551.448891
cwi_4400544905115004090174242311270.3576273.1215-2.76388
cwi_4417534993425001204212334311276.4536278.3233-1.86968
cwi_4417694975244998542264324311272.796275.6708-2.8748
cwi_4420904963815000360251294311272.1864274.0107-1.82429
cwi_4482604955695000920239266311272.796272.7120.083996
cwi_4488774924705004300173248311270.6624270.9488-0.28639
cwi_4503994960595000541248274311271.272273.4902-2.21821
cwi_4505284911634998562264243311264.8712270.0835-5.2123
cwi_4505784989185004433172333311274.32278.1934-3.87335
cwi_4506374911684998581264243311264.5664270.0779-5.51154
cwi_4514834973954996842271323311271.272275.1138-3.84177
cwi_4589384966775003343177312311271.8816274.231-2.34942
cwi_4626074921405004297173247311270.9672271.1994-0.23219
cwi_4646624975574997749267324311273.4056275.6401-2.23448
cwi_4727224908834998388264243311267.9192270.0514-2.13215
cwi_4754304930874997772267250311268.5288271.0942-2.5654
cwi_4754424966884998382264313311275.844274.55991.284084
cwi_4766925031024997426268346311283.1592283.292-0.13276
cwi_4773824951005001724194261311266.7271.8188-5.1188
cwi_4832015000235000666246337311279.1358279.21-0.07419
cwi_4832284953825001970190264311270.9672272.1212-1.15404
cwi_4843084965544997395268308311272.796274.2891-1.49308
cwi_4875424955415002006189265311269.748272.363-2.61497
cwi_4932065029424996946270346311284.988283.10651.881467
cwi_4932085031854997379268346311278.5872283.4015-4.8143
cwi_4932125019354997607268344311282.5496281.65530.894331
cwi_4935674938875004690171254311272.4912271.17331.317875
cwi_4935714964804998021266304311275.5392274.27621.262974
cwi_4949575016254998470264343311275.844281.2861-5.44208
cwi_4950454991185001799193333311271.5768278.0585-6.48168
cwi_4967544975884997820267324311264.5664275.6949-11.1285
cwi_4987614997355003823175336311277.9776279.2165-1.23891
cwi_5004754918984997416268246311268.5288270.6042-2.07537
cwi_5004974964484998102266302311270.3576274.2412-3.88362
cwi_5041894999165000829242337311278.2824279.066-0.78359
Page 4 of 8
CENTERVILLE - WELLHEAD PROTECTION MODEL RUN 8 - SMALL SCALE CALIBRATION RESULTS
NameXYRowColumnLayerGroupZoneObservedComputedResidual
cwi_5053575017604999825256343311281.0256281.3518-0.32619
cwi_5060685008974996643271341311277.9776280.0008-2.02316
cwi_5060735031965003300177346311283.464283.41490.049067
cwi_5076904911094998487264243311259.9944270.0907-10.0963
cwi_5077265005085001262209339311279.1968279.8245-0.62766
cwi_5084824904175004021174242311269.4432273.1216-3.67835
cwi_5095535004325003985174339311281.0256280.18830.837317
cwi_5095634956115001085224266311270.6624272.7113-2.04887
cwi_5096384949335000563247260311268.224271.9267-3.70273
cwi_5096494956055000857241266311271.272272.776-1.50396
cwi_5117055029924996772271346311281.94283.1732-1.23323
cwi_5120725014964996881270343311282.5496280.87791.671683
cwi_5123505018755001343207343311277.6728281.4619-3.78911
cwi_5123515013624999546258342311275.844280.8829-5.0389
cwi_5123864945094997155269257311270.0528272.391-2.33818
cwi_5124875019694998800263344311277.6728281.7089-4.03608
cwi_5134934921065004316173246311271.272271.26010.01192
cwi_5144845026455004045174345311282.2448282.8693-0.6245
cwi_5163575016454999089262343311277.9776281.2703-3.29273
cwi_5163604998575003973174336311277.9776279.4235-1.44591
cwi_5170165001455004162173338311275.844279.8545-4.01045
cwi_5207394985685003663175331311277.6728277.46410.208733
cwi_5263315033204996940270346311283.464283.5828-0.11884
cwi_5277505015995003485176343311280.7208281.4348-0.71396
cwi_5314515030914997217269346311286.512283.28613.225908
cwi_5323675024944998855263345311284.3784282.37562.002832
cwi_5323864968844998521264316311275.2344274.81420.420192
cwi_5343034921075004214173246311270.3576271.1126-0.755
cwi_5383014906634997264269242311264.8712270.16-5.28881
cwi_5392944997855003951174336311277.9776279.3214-1.34383
cwi_5430305032164996869271346311289.56283.45176.108302
cwi_5444525010295002754181341311279.1968280.6957-1.49885
cwi_5482805022684998790263344311284.0736282.09131.982267
cwi_5482934986065003787175331311275.5392277.5439-2.00474
cwi_5501024951115000645246261311272.1864272.1640.022435
cwi_5508214959225001882191272311270.9672273.0211-2.05393
cwi_5508765002505000013254338311280.1112279.50570.605478
cwi_5509915031345003368177346311282.8544283.336-0.48162
cwi_5543184925345004014174248311270.3576270.29550.062089
cwi_5543354983195004329173330311274.6248277.1255-2.50074
cwi_5543384957175001195213268311272.1864272.8048-0.61835
cwi_5543704956125001124219266311272.796272.69960.096419
cwi_5544595032584996763271346311274.32283.504-9.18402
cwi_5578814923734998844263247311268.8336270.302-1.46838
cwi_5578884953635001020232263311271.8816272.4395-0.55793
cwi_5582054919825000353251246311267.9192269.6487-1.72949
cwi_5584634967224997573268313311261.8232274.5093-12.6861
cwi_5653694907235005790167242311263.652273.4115-9.75953
cwi_5661144966624997492268312311273.1008274.4242-1.32344
cwi_5715024903085004254173241311270.0528273.2664-3.21358
cwi_5715344920825004216173246311271.8816271.13720.744416
cwi_5731684922265003965174247311271.8816270.66891.212679
Page 5 of 8
CENTERVILLE - WELLHEAD PROTECTION MODEL RUN 8 - SMALL SCALE CALIBRATION RESULTS
NameXYRowColumnLayerGroupZoneObservedComputedResidual
cwi_5747984911605002459184243311268.8336269.5194-0.68581
cwi_5751934932915005642167251311265.7856272.2078-6.42216
cwi_5781724953825000977235264311270.9672272.4722-1.50503
cwi_5931454973264997335269322311275.5392275.21570.323469
cwi_5951464983744999247261330311274.6248276.8571-2.23228
cwi_5951534974764997418268323311269.748275.4431-5.6951
cwi_6025794977194997881266325311272.4912275.8891-3.39794
cwi_6094574973674997499268322311273.1008275.323-2.22223
cwi_6203364972334997485268321311276.4536275.13781.315782
cwi_6379594920204996910270246311266.0904270.7658-4.67535
cwi_6728315029654996657271346311287.4264283.14114.285343
cwi_6741974924905004772171248311270.6624271.5775-0.91507
cwi_6768044974305005541168323311270.6624274.662-3.99961
cwi_6768065018574997615268343311279.5016281.5421-2.04053
cwi_6932744983684999193261330311274.32276.8438-2.52376
cwi_6932844909714998688263243311267.0048269.9818-2.97697
cwi_6971024978484997855267326311275.2344276.0573-0.82291
cwi_7015855026824997588268345311282.2448282.7086-0.46383
cwi_7120254904185004733171242311267.6144273.2254-5.61097
cwi_7250344983925003228178331311274.0152277.1453-3.13013
cwi_7354024934895004357173252311270.9672270.70610.26113
cwi_7358754904505001115220242311267.9192269.2237-1.30449
cwi_7395344980565004796171328311274.6248276.5139-1.88909
cwi_7440184952314999092262262311270.6624272.8052-2.14277
cwi_7555574936285004987170253311268.8336271.3704-2.53684
nwis_26647495591.54996371273266311274.2792273.28150.997697
nwis_26745490413.94996624272242311266.1114270.1022-3.99084
nwis_27420501834.94998052266343311280.2293281.5329-1.30355
nwis_28151502821.74999549258345311282.5456282.6653-0.11975
obwell_1364903495003179178241311269.3085272.2636-2.95509
obwell_1404951925000418250262311270.4631272.36-1.89686
obwell_5055028314999575258345311282.9856282.67150.314103
obwell_5165010295003204178341311279.1283280.7621-1.63378
syn08_0106495748.15001895191269311265.9731272.7115-6.73838
syn08_0109491660.74997826267245311263.3152270.4386-7.12343
syn08_01895010295003204178341311277.429280.7621-3.33308
syn08_0208491775.54997696267245311264.9078270.5066-5.59881
wb_syn_002503040.35002688182346311282.8514283.0671-0.21569
wb_syn_021501977.64998599264344311282.2494281.73020.519204
wb_syn_025496388.54997174269295311272.988274.0947-1.10671
wb_syn_031501884.34998625264344311281.7663281.6120.154345
wb_syn_047491775.54997696267245311267.7119270.5066-2.79471
wb_syn_100500132.55000301252338311279.1938279.3583-0.16449
wb_syn_110500213.15003979174338311277.9898279.9011-1.91131
wb_syn_122502270.64997609268344311282.5831282.13410.448976
wb_syn_1425033735003337177346311282.9977283.6901-0.69242
wb_syn_1454983125001100222330311276.0566276.9317-0.87513
wb_syn_146502114.84996306273344311282.161281.83260.32836
wb_syn_1514903495003179178241311269.5987272.2636-2.66489
wb_syn_1635028314999575258345311282.7645282.67150.093003
wb_syn_1685010295003204178341311279.4879280.7621-1.27418
wb_syn_174500444.45001033230339311281.3731279.74431.628835
Page 6 of 8
CENTERVILLE - WELLHEAD PROTECTION MODEL RUN 8 - SMALL SCALE CALIBRATION RESULTS
NameXYRowColumnLayerGroupZoneObservedComputedResidual
wb_syn_175500465.75000923238339311281.3502279.77461.575562
cwi_1070445027545004617172345411282.5496282.9743-0.42467
cwi_1240884912645004611172243411271.5768272.2569-0.6801
cwi_1333114923965004742171248411268.224271.602-3.37798
cwi_1396614905945004899170242411272.4912272.28770.203513
cwi_1420224950595001825192261411268.5288271.7164-3.18759
cwi_1558724920165000314251246411267.9192269.7319-1.81274
cwi_1583144904965005486168242411271.272273.3307-2.05872
cwi_1621234968775004833171316411274.32273.06951.250504
cwi_1791744910105005280169243411268.224272.8139-4.58985
cwi_1864984905685003875175242411270.9672271.5948-0.6276
cwi_1956544905015003949174242411265.176271.6182-6.44223
cwi_1956574905975004029174242411265.176271.6293-6.45326
cwi_1956644907005004012174242411269.1384271.6103-2.47185
cwi_2085704956985001302208268411255.4224272.9682-17.5458
cwi_2557174917795004848171245411269.1384272.3254-3.18699
cwi_4052034906635003874175242411270.9672271.5796-0.61235
cwi_4115394905955004258173242411269.1384271.6858-2.54736
cwi_4122594907375003903174242411270.6624271.5709-0.90847
cwi_4122954906945004089174242411270.9672271.6319-0.66474
cwi_4225074926335004287173249411269.1384270.8829-1.74454
cwi_4232624904335004228173242411272.1864271.68040.505961
cwi_4238255018515004801171343411265.7856281.8662-16.0806
cwi_4258284905595003876174242411271.272271.596-0.32398
cwi_4324614922275004285173247411267.3096271.1349-3.82531
cwi_4352914907315005899166242411270.0528273.3791-3.32629
cwi_4488674965215003190178307411271.5768273.0355-1.45871
cwi_4618744967255003249178313411270.9672273.4486-2.48139
cwi_4828814928375004722171249411266.0904271.3912-5.30079
cwi_4875474936995004743171253411270.0528271.2738-1.221
cwi_5007635033995005257169347411279.8064283.6702-3.86383
cwi_5124134935745005890166252411271.272272.1285-0.85652
cwi_5124784964395003222178302411266.7272.763-6.06298
cwi_5134734964375003262177301411270.9672272.7409-1.77369
cwi_5186244964845003261177304411272.1864272.8644-0.67801
cwi_5402924915115004773171244411271.272272.4075-1.13555
cwi_5475924917945004774171245411276.7584272.24244.51596
cwi_5593784932774999122262251411268.5288270.3531-1.82425
cwi_5593864923125000903240247411268.224269.8269-1.60287
cwi_5731554926475005860167249411272.796272.9079-0.11191
cwi_5778385007695003835175340411278.2824280.3578-2.07542
cwi_5874484926925004078174249411268.8336270.4699-1.63633
cwi_5951014919755004625172246411271.5768271.8429-0.26608
cwi_6009794953745005329169263411271.4244272.2914-0.86697
cwi_6030274918145004776171245411270.6624272.2209-1.55846
cwi_6377754923875004769171248411270.0528271.6457-1.5929
cwi_6564244917835004695171245411271.272272.1697-0.89768
cwi_6673914927925004764171249411270.0528271.4512-1.39839
cwi_6679955004285005098170339411277.0632280.0696-3.00642
cwi_6910275011005003857175341411280.7208280.7854-0.06459
cwi_6938944910455005678167243411270.3576273.0519-2.69427
cwi_6980194924675004010174248411269.748270.5209-0.7729
Page 7 of 8
CENTERVILLE - WELLHEAD PROTECTION MODEL RUN 8 - SMALL SCALE CALIBRATION RESULTS
NameXYRowColumnLayerGroupZoneObservedComputedResidual
cwi_7642125004324997479268339411276.7584279.4447-2.68632
cwi_7734005004124997459268339411276.2707279.4128-3.14213
nwis_28614495223.15000445249262411271.4928272.4655-0.97272
obwell_1394951925000421250262411271.5501272.4303-0.88021
syn08_00034951925000421250262411269.2725272.4303-3.15781
wb_syn_179499701.95002287185336411277.621275.73741.883613
Calculated RMSE =3.467
Calculated Mean =-1.959
Page 8 of 8
APPENDIX C
WELL VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEETS
APPENDIX D
ASSESSMENT OF DATA ELEMENTS
Assessment of the Data Elements
This tablepresents the assessment of these data elements relative to the present and future
implications of planning items that are specified in Minnesota Rules, part 4720.5210.
Present and Future
Implications
Data ElementData Source
Well s
Use in
Criteria
DWSMA
Land and
Use of the
Delineation Quantity of
Well Water
Quality and
Groundwater
Precipitation LMMM MN Climatology Office
Geology
Maps and geologic descriptions MHHH MGS
Subsurface data MHHH MGS, MDH, CWI
Borehole geophysics MHHH MGS
Surface geophysics LLLL NotAvailable
Maps and soil descriptions LLMM NRCS
Eroding lands
Water Resources
Watershed units MHHH DNR, USGS
List of public waters MHHH DNR
Shoreland classifications
Wetlands map
Floodplain map
Land Use
Parcel boundaries map LHLL AnokaCounty, Centerville
Political boundaries map LLLL Centerville, MnGEO
PLS map LHLM MnGEO, MDH
Land use map and inventory
Comprehensive land use map
Zoning map
Public Utility Services
Transportation routes and
L M L L MnGEO, MnDOT
corridors
Storm/sanitary sewers and PWS
L H M M Centerville
system map
Oil and gas pipelines map
Public drainage systems map/list LHMM Centerville
Records of well construction,
H H H H Centerville, CWI, MDH Files
maintenance, and use
Surface Water Quantity
Stream flow data L DNR, USGS
MLL
Ordinary high water mark dataDNR, USGS
LMLL
Present and Future
Implications
Data ElementData Source
Well s
Use in
Criteria
DWSMA
Land and
Use of the
Delineation Quantity of
Well Water
Quality and
Groundwater
Permitted withdrawalsDNR
LLLL
Protected levels/flowsDNR
LLLL
Water use conflicts DNR
LLLL
Groundwater Quantity
Permitted withdrawals HHHH DNR, Centerville
Groundwater use conflicts LLLL DNR
Water levels HHHH CWI, MDH, Centerville
Present and Future
Implications
Data ElementData Source
the
Well s
Use in
Criteria
DWSMA
Land and
Use of
Delineation
Quantity of
Well Water
Quality and
Groundwater
Surface Water Quality
Stream and lake water quality
management classification
Monitoring data summary LLMM SWCD
Groundwater Quality
Monitoring data HHHH MDH
Isotopic data HHHH MDH
Tracer studies HHHH Not Available
Contamination site data MMMM MPCA
Property audit data from
contamination sites
MPCA and MDA spills/release
M M M L MPCA, MDA
reports
Definitions Used for Assessing Data Elements:
High (H) - the data element has a direct impact
Moderate (M) - the data element has an indirect or marginal impact
Low (L) - the data element has little if any impact
Shaded - the data element was not required by MDH for preparing the WHP plan
Acronyms used in this report are listed on page ii, after the “Glossary of Terms.”
CITY OF CENTERVILLE
CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION & COUNCIL MEETING
July 22, 2020
5:00 p.m./6:30 p.m.
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, the City of Centerville held their regularly scheduled City
Council Work Session & Council Meeting on July 22, 2020 via Zoom Videoconferencing at:
https://zoom.us/j/478824301, Meeting ID: 478 824 301 with audio only available at: 312-626-
6799. The meeting was also live streamed by North Metro TV.
WORK SESSION
I. CALL TO ORDER
Mayor D. Love called the work session to order at 5:06 p.m.
PRESENT: Mayor D. Love
Council Member Russ Koski (Arrived at 5:14 p.m.)
Council Member Michelle Lakso
Council Member Tom Wilharber
ABSENT: Council Member Matt Montain
STAFF: City Administrator Mark Statz
Finance Director Bruce DeJong
the noted individuals were visibly and audibly
present on the videoconference call.
II. ITEMS OF DISCUSSION
1. General Fund Budget
Administrator Statz explained that Staff reviewed the budget and refined several line items. He
stated that Staff accounted for a 2-3% increase in the Centennial Lakes Police contract for 2021
due to several factors involving the formula and amount of calls, a new Chief on board who has
stated that he may have some new ideas but does not desire to rebuild the department. He stated
that lawn mowing and capital project contingencies were built in. He also stated that the Storm
Water and Street Fund should have some cushion. City Administrator Statz stated that the budget
does not need to be adhered to in the way that you must spend the dollars but if they are needed
they are there. He explained that the Council has until September to make final decisions.
Finance Director DeJong stated that Staff desired to include known items such as gambling tax as
COVID-19 affected this and additional review of Fire Aid versus reimbursements. He stated that
he felt that the newly presented General Fund Budget was pretty straight forward. He reported
that both he and City Administrator Statz felt that it would be prudent to reflect the loss of income
due to the discontinuance of the lease of the
Administrator Statz stated that Staff removed rebranding and the intern position, but would take
input from Council on how they would like to proceed.
City of Centerville
Council Meeting Minutes
July 22, 2020
Discussion ensued regarding benefit of an intern and proper direction of the position, union
contract negotiations and renewal, Centennial Lakes Police contract of a 3% increase, Centennial
Fire District contract increase of approximately $10,000, additional consideration of items not
considered, feelings of uncertainty due to COVID-19, hiring of additional fire fighters to obtain
full capacity as proposed by the Co-Interim Fire Chief Streich, decreasing the Centennial Lakes
Police line item by $5,000, Debt Service Levy, Capital Project Fund contingency of $50,000.
Discussion also took place regarding building permit revenue and a slight reduction in fines.
Lengthy discussion was had regarding the staffing levels of the Centennial Fire District, Duty
Crew, lack of day-time responders, equipment and anticipation for receiving comments from the
hired consultant regarding the department and staffing levels.
Council Member Lakso asked if the City regularly had received Local Government Aid (LGA).
Administrator Statz stated that last year it was approximately $80,000. Finance Director DeJong
stated that the City is not anticipating a significant change in the amount for 2021. Mayor Love
stated that the City needed to be grateful as with COVID-19 the City may not receive anything.
Administrator Statz stated that the City relies on property taxes for its revenue versus other
communities that rely heavily on sales tax, state aid and alike. These communities are
experiencing difficulties keeping staff and funding essential services related to COVID factors.
2. Water Treatment - Manganese
Administrator Statz stated that the City of Lino Lakes and other communities are considering water
treatment plants. He stated that there recently was an article in the paper about them entertaining
constructing one and they have reached out to the City of Centerville to determine our interest in
participating. He stated that Manganese has been discussed for years but recently the Minnesota
Department of Health has stated that levels for infants should be less than 100 ppb with adults
being less than 300 ppb. He stated that Centerville
that Well #2 is the most widely used and slightly lower in numbers.
He stated that Mr. Ryan Capelle, Stantec, Project Manager, Water Treatment, P.E. was available
to discuss the topic and provide insight in to appropriate levels, education, strategies for the future,
etc.
Mr. Capelle introduced himself to Council and stated that he has spoken with agencies at the
Federal level, MN Dept. of Health and the City of Lino Lakes regarding the topic and provided
Council Members with history of Manganese, it being in drinking water, levels being deemed safe
and unsafe throughout the years and ways of protecting and delivering safe/reliable drinking water
to residents. He stated that Manganese in drinking water was found to be a contaminate in 1998,
but at that time it was not warranted to be regulated. He stated, that now it has been reintroduced
to the Contaminate Candidate List (CCL) for the fourth round (CCL4, 2016). He stated that he
had spoken with Ms. Carla Peterson, MN Department of Health, who made comments that within
10 years she felt that increased regulations would occur. Mr. Capelle stated that it may appear
again on the CCL5, 2021 but there would be a period of time to take action. He stated that at this
time many communities are venturing into to very, very expensive systems to remove or decrease
the amount in drinking water. He stated that he felt that the City may desire to provide residents
Page 2 of 14
City of Centerville
Council Meeting Minutes
July 22, 2020
with education (Open House/literature/baby formulas that are low in Manganese) and the use of
equipment such as reverse osmosis systems, water softeners, etc. He stated that several larger
communities are taking action to reduce contaminates in drinking water by constructing water
treatment facilities such as Brooklyn Park, Ramsey, Lino Lakes, etc. He stated that these were
large steps and very expensive steps. He also stated that the MN Department of Health will be out
testing wells within the next 18 months and also stated that they would more than likely complete
two (2) sets of testing as it is recommended to test back to back due to pump variabilities, etc. He
also reported that he has worked with the Public Works Director on this issue.
Council Member Koski stated that he had concerns for younger and old individuals that were more
susceptible and that he felt education was a wonderful place to start that that other inexpensive
avenues could help the delivery of safe/reliable drinking water to residents or equipment installed
at their homes. He stated that the City of Lino Lakes is considering a $20,000,000 project and
desires to have Centerville participate for $4,000,000. Administrator Statz stated that there were
less expensive avenues available for a short term fix whereas the treatment plant would be a long
term fix. He also stated that the City does not have the complaints about water staining and
smelling or pipe scaling as maybe other communities have which would be another reason to
justify such a project.
Council Member Lakso asked if we currently treat our own water. City Administrator Statz stated
that we do have a well room on the other side of Council Chambers but it is not filtered. He stated
that it is mixed with three chemicals and then forwarded to residents. Administrator Statz stated
that there is a lot of items that play into the ppb and requirements than meet the eye. Discussion
ensued regarding if a child attends daycare in the City where precautions are taken and then returns
home where nothing is done, we have completed our due diligence but the other community(ies)
maybe not. Mr. Capelle stated that northern Anoka County appears to contain a higher level of
Manganese that other communities in southern Anoka County but just slightly. He also stated that
after an infant turns one year old the threshold increases to 300 ppb.
Council Member Wilharber questioned the possibility of providing free bottled water to residents
that desired it. Mr. Capelle stated that he felt a reverse osmosis system would be a more suitable
solution in a home that had an infant or someone who was compromised/sensitive. Council
Member Wilharber questioned the interconnection between the City of Lino Lakes and Centerville
and questioned how often we take water from them comparative to how often they take water from
us. He also questioned whether the Cities could buy water from each other. City Administrator
Statz stated that generally they take water from the City and there are nume
can be installed between the systems to allow for exchange, purchasing of water or filtration. Mr.
Capelle stated that he was happy to hold a meeting to discuss/educate residents on Manganese
similar to that which was held in Lino Lakes.
Mayor Love added clarification as to the Lino Lakes water interconnection and that gallons are
paid back between the two (2) entities. Administrator Statz concurred. Discussion ensued
regarding a private homeowner getting their well tested for Manganese. Mr. Capelle stated that
a lab that would complete testing along with the
MN Dept. of Health.
Page 3 of 14
City of Centerville
Council Meeting Minutes
July 22, 2020
Council discussion ensued, favoring more research, testing, and education along with the
exploration of grants for those that have infants in their households, providing a reverse osmosis
system.
The general desire was to be cautious with proceeding forward and more research was needed.
Consensus of the Council was that education was key and that information could be placed in the
vestibule and on the web site.
III. RECESS
Mayor Love called a five (5) minutes recess at 6:25 p.m.
COUNCIL MEETING
I. CALL TO ORDER
Mayor D. Love called the meeting to order at 6:31 p.m.
ROLL CALL*
PRESENT: Mayor D. Love
Council Member Russ Koski
Council Member Michelle Lakso
Council Member Tom Wilharber
ABSENT: Council Member Matt Montain
STAFF: City Administrator Mark Statz
City Attorney Kurt Glaser
Finance Director Bruce DeJong
the noted individuals were visibly and audibly
present on the videoconference call.
II. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
III. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
Mayor Love provided an opportunity for others to add or delete any items.
City Administrator Statz Love added Checks to agenda.
Motion by Council Member Wilharber, seconded by Council Member Koski to Approve the
Agenda with the noted additions. A roll-call vote was taken. Mayor Love and Council
Members Koski, Lakso, & Wilharber voted in favor. Motion carried.
Page 4 of 14
City of Centerville
Council Meeting Minutes
July 22, 2020
IV. APPOINTMENTS/PRESENTATIONS
1. unty Business Assistance Program
Anoka County Commissioner Reinert thanked Council for providing him with the opportunity to
speak to you prior to the Primary and General Elections. He stated that he has filed for Anoka
County Commission and reviewed the Counties accomplishments since he has been in office. He
stated that he has been involved with lobbying, asking for federal dollars and receiving them, the
plan for keeping Chamonix Golf Course open and operating in the black and self-insured health
care for County employees. Mayor Love asked what Commissioner Reinert has accomplished in
the time that he has been serving. Commissioner Reinert stated that there are 21 cities within
Anoka County and that he represents seven (7) of them. He stated that his goal was to complete
something for each city that he represents. He stated that the City of Linwood had no senior
housing and that they are currently completing analysis to determine if similar housing can be
brought there within the next five (5) years. He discussed trail connections within Circle Pines as
the project was extremely expensive and he has been able to get funds dedicated to complete a
feasibility study. He stated that Centerville Road has a huge amount of pedestrian traffic on it and
the County is working on a feasibility study to widen the roadway and make it safer so no one gets
hurt. He stated that in Columbus there was a need for more accountability of the RCWD. He
stated that individuals may have seen a recent article regarding this. He stated that a new individual
was appointed not too long ago and that research has been completed that she has the ability to
complete her job and very knowledgeable. He stated that she did not get reappointed and he is
unaware of what happened with the study. He also stated that Birch Street would be completed in
2021 with the addition of a round-about to replace the
Blaine and Lexington have concerns over streetlights and that an
Commissioner Reinert stated that issues have been difficult due to COVID and Zoom meetings
and that just recently face to face meetings have been taking place. He stated that the County has
similar issues that City does just on a larger level. He stated that he is running for re-election.
Mayor Love pointed out that the work/study on Centerville Road is in the City of Lino Lakes. He
th
also mentioned that the City needed assistance with the intersection at 20 Avenue and Main Street
if he desired to put that on a list for Centerville.
Council Member Lakso stated that she would like to see more human service amenities on this
side of Anoka County as most residents utilize neighboring County services due to distance and
location of current services provided in Anoka County.
Council Member Wilharber stated that he agreed with Commissioner Reinert regarding the
dangerous situation with traffic at the County line of Ramsey County and Anoka County. Council
Member Wilharber wished Commissioner Reinert the best in his endeavor to secure a seat on the
County Board again.
Council Member Koski thanked Commissioner Reinert for appearing before Council and desired
tention to Ms. Jacquel Hajder, Economic Development Specialist
and stated that she has been doing a wonderful job and work for the communities. He spoke of
the data corridor and the availability of being able to accommodate a facility and meeting their
Page 5 of 14
City of Centerville
Council Meeting Minutes
July 22, 2020
needs, marketing, etc. that she has brought to the table. Commissioner Reinert concurred.
Additional discussion ensued regarding a full intersection at County J and 35E and Commissioner
Reinert stated that it will not be a full reconstruction but a round-about.
Administrator Statz asked about the CARES Act funding and how it would be distributed fairly
between communities. Commission Reinert stated that discussions have taken place regarding
that issue and he felt that not all affected Commissioners were involved. He stated that such
meetings are important to obtain all Commissioners input and that he is addressing that issue with
the Board. Discussion ensued regarding shortfalls with businesses and school districts and the
importance of funding being forwarded fairly.
Mayor Love thanked Commissioner Reinert for his attendance and report and stated that he desired
for all citizens of Anoka County to be feed and have a place to live. Commissioner Reinert
concurred.
V. PUBLIC HEARINGS/INPUT
1. SWPPP
Administrator Statz stated that on an annual basis the City is required to hold a public meeting
regarding the City's Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4). He stated that through the
storm sewer system the City discharges waters to creeks, streams and lakes. He stated that this is
an entirely different system than the sanitary sewers and is not treated. He also stated that many
organizations are involved with the management of these waters including Met. Council, DNR,
State Board of Water and Soil Resources (BWSR), and the Rice Creek Watershed (RCWD). He
reviewed the documents that are required by the City (National Pollutant Discharge Elimination
System (NPDES) MS4 Permit, Local Surface Water Management Plan, and RCWD's plans
and regulations). He also stated that he has had discussions with RCWD regarding overlapping of
services and permitting.
Administrator Statz stated that there are 6 minimum control measures that are contained in the
MS4 permit. He stated that one (1) is public education and outreach (handouts in the vestibule
and information available on the City's web site), two (2) is public participation and involvement
(annual meeting), three (3) is illicit discharge detection and elimination (Public Works'
inspections), four (4) is construction site storm water runoff control (silt fence/bio rolls and gravel
entrances), five (5) post-construction storm water management (storm ponds constructed along
with the development) and six (6) pollution prevention and good housekeeping for municipal
operations (street sweeping and minimal salt usage on the roadways).
Mayor Love opened the public hearing/input meeting.
Council Member Lakso asked about the storm sewer drains and questioned if the City and the
processes surrounding them. Administrator Statz stated that the Public Works staff will provide
educational information via door knocker when a violation has occurred or they will blow grass
yards along with a doorknocker. He stated that most lawn
contracting services are knowledgeable and do not do things like this. Discussion ensued that
previously the Boy Scouts placed educational labels on the storm sewer drains that stated Leads to
Page 6 of 14
City of Centerville
Council Meeting Minutes
July 22, 2020
the Creek/Stream in an attempt to education residents and maybe updating was needed. Discussion
also took place regarding ponds (111), raingardens, sump manholes, private ponds not being a part
aminated, sump pumps outlets being directed into
lawns and effects on lakes and streams.
Administrator Statz stated that
desired, the City could pursue that.
Mr. Steve King, 1724 Sorel Street asked if there was a State Statute that gave the RCWD the
authority over ponds, drains, storm sewers, and regulation. He stated that the reasoning for asking
is the redundancy of reporting, etc. Administrator Statz stated that the RCWD does have the
authority and the various agencies are working toward solutions for reporting, etc. to alleviate
duplication of services and costs. Discussion ensued regarding testing for pollutants in storm
ponds/outfalls (33), design parameters of ponds, phosphorus, silt, mercury, park reuse system, etc.
Mayor Love stated that Administrator Statz was doing a good job with sharing with agencies
regarding redundancy and communicating with Council in attempts to keep all informed.
The public input portion of the meeting was held open in case there were further comments from
the public.
VI. APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES
1. June 24, 2020 Council Work Session and Meeting Minutes
Mayor Love provided Council Members with an opportunity for amending the presented minutes:
additions, and/or modifications.
Council Member Koski stated that
Police Governing Board. Council Member Lakso requested that she desired for the language on
as the study was not completed and decisions regarding the existing structure have not been
discussed.
Motion by Council Member Koski, seconded by Council Member Lakso to Approve the June
24, 2020 Council Work Session and Meeting Minutes with the Above Stated Modifications.
A roll-call vote was taken. Mayor Love and Council Members Koski, Lakso, & Wilharber
voted in favor. Motion carried.
VII. CONSENT AGENDA
1. Centerville Claims through July 22, 2020 (Check #34084-34125) & (1546E-1551E)
2. Centennial Lake Police Department Claims through July 16, 2020 (Check
#13274-13302) & (E2020024-2020025)
3. Centennial Fire District Claims through July 14, 2020 (Check #8853-8860) &
(E2020018-2020019
Page 7 of 14
City of Centerville
Council Meeting Minutes
July 22, 2020
4. Successful Performance Review, Year 1
Receptionist
Mayor D. Love provided an opportunity for Council to add or remove any item(s) to/from the
consent agenda.
Mayor Love recognized Part-Time Receptionist Ms. Schlundt for her work ethic and congratulated
her on her completion of one year of service with the City of Centerville.
Motion by Council Member Koski, seconded by Council Member Lakso to Approve Consent
Agenda as Presented. A roll-call vote was taken. Mayor Love and Council Members Koski,
Lakso, & Wilharber voted in favor. Motion carried.
Motion by Council Member Koski, seconded by Council Member Wilharber to Close the
Public Hearing/Input Meeting at 7:44 p.m. A roll-call vote was taken. Mayor Love and
Council Members Koski, Lakso, & Wilharber voted in favor. Motion carried.
VIII.OLD BUSINESS
1. & Authorize Advertisements for Bids
Administrator Statz stated that the project was ready for approval of the plans and authorizing
advertisements for bids. He stated that Staff recommends that the bids contain numerous
alternative portions of the bid so that Council has the ability to choose options and determine if
those items are within budget or are reasonably priced.
Administrator Statz reviewed the renderings fr
slightly curved dais for Council stating that Council had the ability to see each other better and he
explained that the cost was reasonable. He stated that minimal space would be lost for public
seating. Council Member Lakso stated that everything has been discussed and that she was excited
about the project. Council Member Koski stated that Council and Staff have reviewed the plans
several times and he is curious for the bids. He thanked Administrator Statz for his efforts and the
way the alternates were included. Discussion ensued regarding floor coverings, HVAC equipment
(Fire/City Hall), and elimination of the Fire HVAC due to condition/use. Some discussion took
place regarding items that were included as alternates (history wall, floor coverings entry way,
hallway, etc.). Mayor Love also stated that he was looking forward to receiving the bids.
Motion by Council Member Wilharber, seconded by Council Member Koski to Approve the
Plans & Authorize Advertisements for Bids. A roll-call vote was taken. Mayor Love and
Council Members Koski, Lakso & Wilharber voted in favor. Motion carried.
2.
Administrator Statz stated that this item was on a previous agenda, approved by Council and now
the time period allotted has expired. He stated that Staff was unable to apply the appropriate time
to research group homes/assisted living/nursing homes due to COVID-19. He stated that the City
Page 8 of 14
City of Centerville
Council Meeting Minutes
July 22, 2020
is unfamiliar with County regulations, State licensing requirements, possible drain on public safety
services, etc.
Administrator Statz stated that he believes that there were issues with bids for construction of the
proposed facility which has delayed construction. He believes that they still intend on moving
forward.
Attorney Glaser stated that if Council desired to place the interim ordinance back on the books the
same processes as previously would need to be completed. He stated that the conditions of the
previous ordinance would remain but it would allow study/research time which the City was
unable to complete previously. He stated that the new ordinance would be for a period of 90 days
and a public hearing would need to be held.
Discussion ensued regarding passing the item to the Planning and Zoning Commission for review
of the existing ordinance and Attorney Glaser stated that nothing has been studied at this point and
that Staff should be completing this action. Concerns for the City ceasing the current proposed
construction of the facility and Attorney Glaser stated that their applications were submitted prior
to this interim ordinance so it would not slow the current developer.
Council Member Lakso asked what considerations/concerns should be brought to light.
Administrator Statz explained that with limited staffing of the facility at certain intervals in a 24
hour period, taxing of the public safety services (Fire Department for lift assists, medical assistance
calls, etc.). He stated that when these types of calls happen and timeliness of calls, the City is
incurring increased expenditures due to call formulas, staffing, etc. He also stated that other
communities have similar facilities and there are numerous models that the City would like to
review and requirements place by other communities on each type of model, etc.
Council Member Love stated that he felt the Planning and Zoning Commission could determine
the best district for a similar business (Commercial/Residential).
desired to commence the Interim Ordinance again a
public hearing would need to be called for.
Motion by Council Member Wilharber, seconded by Council Member Koski to Commence
the Process for an Interim Ordinance. A roll-call vote was taken. Mayor Love and Council
Members Koski, Lakso & Wilharber voted in favor. Motion carried.
3.
Mayor Love stated that he has received complaints about the streets adjacent to project and desired
to be reassured that they are being cleaned at the end of the day (Centerville Road and Main Street).
Administrator Statz stated that Mayor Love was correct.
Administrator Statz stated that scussions took place and Council
approved the upsizing of the storm sewer to accommodate future downtown redevelopment. He
stated that additional discussion needed to be had regarding funding of the upsizing due to Council
action. He stated that included in the packet was a formal Change Order which included the
Page 9 of 14
City of Centerville
Council Meeting Minutes
July 22, 2020
upsizing and expenditures associated with COVID-19 project suspension. He stated that those
costs ($22,255.68) would be reimbursable through the CARES Act Funding that the City would
be receiving.
Administrator Statz stated that numerous discussions have taken place regarding bonding for
similar projects, paying cash for this project, carrying debt, paying interest, etc. He stated that
funding has been discussed regarding utilizing Storm Sewer Funds versus Street Funds and a
combination of utilizing both funds or acting similar to a bank by borrowing funds from the
Water/Sewer Funds, etc. Finance Director DeJong stated that if Storm Sewer Funds were utilized
the fund would be in the negative for 2020 and if no ditch maintenance or backyard maintenance
was completed in 2021 the upsizing of the storm sewer piping would be paid for through the fund
Council Member Wilharber stated that this was the ample time to upsize the storm sewer due to
construction. Council Member Koski concurred and stated that he was disappointed that the
upsizing was not included on the original bid. He stated that he had concerns that the $22,255.68
would not be covered by the CARES Act Funding. Administrator Statz stated that funds could be
borrowed from other funds if that were the case. Council Member Koski stated that he had
concerns regarding COVID and the possibility of the City having difficulties due to taxpayer
inability to pay property taxes and that there are unknowns.
Mayor Love stated that Council planned not to borrow funds to complete the Downtown Street
Project, he was slightly surprised about the potential for a negative Storm Sewer Fund. Mayor
Love also stated that during the budgeting process consideration for placing money in this account
would be advisable.
Motion by Council Member Wilharber, seconded by Council Member Lakso to Approve
y Improvements as Submitted and to be
Financed Through a Combination of Storm Water Funds and Street Funds. A roll-call vote
was taken. Mayor Love and Council Members Koski, Lakso & Wilharber voted in favor.
Motion carried.
IX. NEW BUSINESS
1. None.
X. COUNCIL/ADMINISTRATOR ANNOUNCEMENTS
1.
Administrator Statz gave a brief review of items that have taken place since the last meeting. He
stated that the City has gone out for bids for the City Hall project,
mandatory face masks indoors, inability to refuse voters that chose not to wear face masks,
notification to Anoka County who then handled early voting, recent results of employee testing
negative and services being back to normal.
Page 10 of 14
City of Centerville
Council Meeting Minutes
July 22, 2020
Administrator Statz also provided a brief review of the EDA and their recent meeting stating that
CenterStage, Facebook and Twitter all have been great avenues for businesses and the City has
received nice results from NorthMetro TV.
businesses being interested. Administrator Statz also stated that the Committee approved a $5,000
grant to assist a Downtown building owner with construction associated with access to the building
and a patio. He stated that these funds comply with the requirements of the EDA and sprucing up
the front facades of buildings, etc. He also reported that the City has applied for $304,000 in
CARES Act Funding associated with COVID-19 expenses. He stated that the funds will cover
expenditures associated with the purchases of personal protective equipment (PPE), hand sanitizer,
cleaning, purchases such as laptops, etc. to provide services. He also stated that the funds will
cover Staff salaries for Public Works due to rotational work schedules. He stated that the funds
will also assist the Police and Fire Departments due to their expenditures also. Administrator
Statz stated that the funds could also be utilized to assist local businesses that have been affected
by COVID-19 and that additional discussions would be had to discuss how these funds would be
accounted for.
Administrator Statz stated that the Bayview Villas development has only two (2) lots available
with all others being sold. He stated that he had been contacted by the developers of Old Mill
Estates who desire to go forward with Phase II of their project. He also stated that building permits
have been issued for the mini-storage project and that an easement needed to be vacated on 1825
Main Street to allow for the construction of the proposed 16-unit care facility. Administrator Statz
stated that the Planning & Zoning Commission has been busy reviewing several ordinances and
putting final touches for modifications. He stated that home sales are holding steady and the
economy appears to continue to be strong. He reported that the Public Works Department had
recently hired a jetter to clean some areas of the sewer system that were experiencing flowage
problems, that the water main installation in the Downtown area was occurring with several
residents desiring to be connected. He also reported that a Music in the Park event was recently
held with 40-50 individuals in attendance and that all events ar
and Twitter. Administrator Statz also stated with the hiring of a new Police Chief and Co-Interim
Fire Chief there is nice momentum with the departments.
Council Member Koski asked if there were complaints associated with the extended work hours
in the Downtown area. Administrator Statz stated that he was unaware of any.
Council Reports
a.
i. No report was given.
ii. Centennial Fire District Council Member
Lakso stated that she was unable to attend a portion of the meeting;
however, Co-Interim Chief Streich is providing leadership and bringing
the chain of command back in an attempt to regain a strong department.
He is requesting that if there are any issues/concerns from residents,
staff or Council that they are directed to the Co-Chiefs. She reported
that the department is requesting to strengthen their staff to 40
firefighters and continue with duty crew. She reported that the budget
Page 11 of 14
City of Centerville
Council Meeting Minutes
July 22, 2020
proposed should remain flat and that the current study of the department
has not been completed.
iii. No report was given.
b.
i. No report given
ii. Economic Development Authority
stated that EDA discussed the CenterStage program and adding a co-
program with the Quad Community Press and advertising. He also
reported that the EDA desired to purchase several banners for the
Downtown area along Main Street. He reported that the EDA had their
own funding and checking account.
c.
i. Fire District Steering Committee
Council Member Lakso for her report and added that Co-Interim Chiefs
Streich and Peil have been working well together and complement each
other. He stated that Co-Interim Chief Streich feels that increasing staff
will guarantee the appropriate firefighters are on scene for a structure
fire and that adequate personal protective gear was available. He stated
that Co-Interim Chief Streich has requested that several changes be
made to their policies for employment including a zero tolerance to
alcohol. He stated that the Committee is anticipating the information
from the study and the look of the Department going forward.
Mayor Love thanked both Council Members Lakso and Koski for their
reports and stated that is sounding as though bringing Co-Interim Chief
Streich back as a consultant was a good idea and that he is providing the
Department with strong skills and leadership.
Council Member Wilharber asked about the employment policy and he
was unaware that there were needs for modifications due to alcohol
requirements, rotating shifts, etc. Council Member Koski stated that he
felt that Co-Interim Chief Streich desired to modify the policy to more
clearly address alcohol uses and the addition of a no tolerance policy.
He also stated that previously a Survey Monkey was forwarded to
present volunteer firefighters with results showing that there were moral
issues. He stated that members of the Committee felt that it was needed
to address that issue and that it may have been hindering the recruitment
of others.
Council Member Wilharber asked about a recent gas main hit during
construction of the Downtown Street Project. Administrator Statz stated
that the contractor hit the main and again today. They discussed the
seriousness of the situation
Page 12 of 14
City of Centerville
Council Meeting Minutes
July 22, 2020
d. Montain
i. No report was given due to absence.
ii. North Metro Telecommunications Commission
given due to absence.
e. Love
i. Police Governing Board
rally/march that was very peaceful which happened in Circle Pines. He
stated that they are current working on their 2021 budget and that it has
ii. Economic Development Authority
iii. Other Mayoral Reports that there would be a
Rush Line Corridor meeting the following day.
XI. RECESS REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING
Mayor Love recessed the Regular City Council meeting at 8:44 p.m.
Attorney Glaser read the following language: Pursuant to Minnesota State Statute Section 13D.05,
subdivision 3(b), subject to the iscussion and examination of
confidentiality is required for a full and candid discussion with legal counsel and such discussion
could not occur in a public setting without
CLOSED EXECUTIVE WORK SESSION (PURSUANT TO MINN. STAT.
§13d.05, SUBD. 3(b)
CITY OF CENTERVILLE
CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
IN CLOSED SESSION
MINNESOTA STATUTE CHAPTER 13D.05
The City Council of Centerville, Minnesota met for a regularly scheduled Meeting on Wednesday,
July 22, 2020, at: 6:30 p.m. The meeting was held virtually using Zoom and broadcast live via
community access cable television. At 8:47 p.m. the Council moved into a Closed Session pursuant
Minnesota Statute Section 13D.05, subdivision 3(b), subject to the following statement of purpose:
Landscaping, LLC. Absolute confidentiality is required for a full and candid discussion with legal
counsel and such discussion could not occur in a public setting without
Present were Mayor D. Love, Council Members Michelle Lakso, Tom Wilharber, and Russ Koski.
Council Member Matt Montain was absent. Also present were City Attorney Kurt Glaser and City
Administrator Mark Statz.
Page 13 of 14
City of Centerville
Council Meeting Minutes
July 22, 2020
The City Attorney presented concepts and strategy to be discussed at an upcoming mediation with
Alex Shuda and his legal counsel. All present in the session discussed concepts and strategy, and
imparted their ideas and opinions to the City Attorney. No formal action was taken during the
Session.
NOTE: The details of the discussion during this Session remain confidential pursuant to the
attorney-client privilege.
Motion by Council Member Koski, seconded by Council Member Lakso, to adjourn into
open session. A roll-call vote was taken. Mayor Love and Council Members Koski, Lakso
& Wilharber voted in favor. Motion carried.
XII. RECONVENE REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING
The meeting was reopened to the public at 10:28 p.m. by act of the Mayor.
Prepared by Kurt Glaser, City Attorney
XIII. ADJOURNMENT
Motion by Council Member Koski, seconded by Council Member Lakso to Adjourn the
Regularly Scheduled City Council Meeting of July 22, 2020 at 10:32 p.m. A roll-call vote
was taken. Mayor Love and Council Members Koski, Lakso & Wilharber voted in favor.
Motion carried.
Respectfully submitted by City Clerk, Teresa Bender.
Page 14 of 14
09/04/20 1:39 PM
CITY OF CENTERVILLE
Page 1
Check Detail - August 27 Sept. 9, 2020
Check
DateCheck #Vender NameCommentsAmount
19/4/2020001570EMINNESOTA DEPT OF REVENUESTATE W/H - PAY PERIOD 18$1,219.15
Check Nbr 001570 MINNESOTA DEPT OF REVENUE$1,219.15
19/4/2020001571EOPTUM BANK - H.S.A.H.S.A. W/H - PAY PERIOD 18$1,300.00
Check Nbr 001571 OPTUM BANK - H.S.A.$1,300.00
19/4/2020001572EIRS/EFTPSFICA/MED W/H - PAY PERIOD 18$4,401.30
19/4/2020001572EIRS/EFTPSFED W/H - PAY PERIOD 18$2,807.17
Check Nbr 001572 IRS/EFTPS$7,208.47
19/4/2020001573EPERAPERA W/H - PAY PERIOD 18$3,641.00
Check Nbr 001573 PERA$3,641.00
19/3/2020001574ETASCF.S.A. W/H - PAY PERIOD 18$114.58
Check Nbr 001574 TASC$114.58
19/3/2020001575EPSNMISC. - ACH CHARGES- SERV THRU 8-31-20$3.63
19/3/2020001575EPSNPERMIT AND FEES - ACH CHARGES- SERV THRU 8-31-20$125.78
19/3/2020001575EPSNUTILITIES - ACH CHARGES - SERV THRU 8-31-20$159.72
19/3/2020001575EPSNUTILITIES - ACH CHARGES - SERV THRU 8-31-20$159.73
Check Nbr 001575 PSN$448.86
18/27/2020034190 AMERITASVISION CARE - THRU 9-30-20$6.12
Check Nbr 034190 AMERITAS$6.12
18/27/2020034191 CHEESEBROW, TIMMUSIC IN THE PARK - TIM CHEESEBROW - 8-25-20$300.00
Check Nbr 034191 CHEESEBROW, TIM$300.00
18/27/2020034192 DELTA DENTALDENTAL INS - SEPT 2020$449.95
Check Nbr 034192 DELTA DENTAL$449.95
18/27/2020034193 MAIN STREET MARKETERSSOCIAL MEDIA - COVID - FACEBOOK TWITTER POST CENTER$300.00
Check Nbr 034193 MAIN STREET MARKETERS$300.00
19/9/2020034194 A-1 EXCAVATING INC.PAY REQUEST 5 - 2020 DOWNTOWN AREA STREET & UT IMPR$90,097.63
19/9/2020034194 A-1 EXCAVATING INC.PAY REQUEST 4 - 2020 DOWNTOWN AREA STREET & UT IMPR$424,975.54
19/9/2020034194 A-1 EXCAVATING INC.PAY REQUEST 3 - 2020 DOWNTOWN AREA STREET & UT IMPR$115,568.14
Check Nbr 034194 A-1 EXCAVATING INC.$630,641.31
19/9/2020034195 AIRFRESH INDUSTIRES, INC.EXTRA PUMPING SERVICES - LAMOTTE PARK PORTABLE REST$72.00
19/9/2020034195 AIRFRESH INDUSTIRES, INC.LAMOTTE PARK, ACORN CREEK, TRACY MCBRIDE, ROYAL MEA$797.50
19/9/2020034195 AIRFRESH INDUSTIRES, INC.EXTRA PUMPING SERVICES - LAMOTTE PARK PORTABLE REST$72.00
19/9/2020034195 AIRFRESH INDUSTIRES, INC.LAMOTTE PARK - ADA PORTABLE RESTROOM - SERV THRU F$110.00
Check Nbr 034195 AIRFRESH INDUSTIRES, INC.$1,051.50
19/9/2020034196 ALLSTREAMPHONE SERV THRU 9-22-20$99.31
Check Nbr 034196 ALLSTREAM$99.31
19/9/2020034197 ANOKA COUNTY PROPERTY RECORDS2271397.005 - 7305 DEER PASS ENCROACHMENT AGREEMEN$46.00
19/9/2020034197 ANOKA COUNTY PROPERTY RECORDS2771397.004 - 7060 COTTONWOOD CT ENCROACHMENT AGR$46.00
Check Nbr 034197 ANOKA COUNTY PROPERTY RECORDS$92.00
19/9/2020034198 ANOKA COUNTY TREASURYSEPT. 2020 BROADBAND$37.50
19/9/2020034198 ANOKA COUNTY TREASURYSEPT. 2020 BROADBAND$37.50
19/9/2020034198 ANOKA COUNTY TREASURYSEPT. 2020 BROADBAND$37.50
Check Nbr 034198 ANOKA COUNTY TREASURY$112.50
19/9/2020034199 ASCAPLICENCE FEES FOR MUSIC IN THE PARK FOR THE PERIOD 1-1$10.00
Check Nbr 034199 ASCAP$10.00
19/9/2020034200 BURNET TITLE**2051 WILLOW CIR-OVER PD FINAL UT BILL$102.71
Check Nbr 034200 BURNET TITLE**$102.71
19/9/2020034201 CENTENNIAL LAKES POLICE DEPT2020 POLICE SERVICES FOR SEPT.$71,799.08
09/04/20 1:39 PM
CITY OF CENTERVILLE
Page 2
Check Detail - August 27 Sept. 9, 2020
Check
DateCheck #Vender NameCommentsAmount
Check Nbr 034201 CENTENNIAL LAKES POLICE DEPT$71,799.08
19/9/2020034202 CITY OF CIRCLE PINES2020 POLICE BLDG CONTRACT - SEPT$139.79
19/9/2020034202 CITY OF CIRCLE PINES2020 POLICE BLDG CONTRACT - SEPT$5,416.67
Check Nbr 034202 CITY OF CIRCLE PINES$5,556.46
19/9/2020034203 CITY OF ROSEVILLEIT SUPPORT SERVICES THRU SEPTEMBER$503.25
19/9/2020034203 CITY OF ROSEVILLENETMOTION - K SWEENEY - COMPUTER$409.00
19/9/2020034203 CITY OF ROSEVILLEIT SUPPORT SERVICES THRU SEPTEMBER$503.25
19/9/2020034203 CITY OF ROSEVILLEIT SUPPORT SERVICES THRU SEPTEMBER$503.25
19/9/2020034203 CITY OF ROSEVILLEIT SUPPORT SERVICES THRU SEPTEMBER$503.25
Check Nbr 034203 CITY OF ROSEVILLE$2,422.00
19/9/2020034204 CLEARY, JAMES - MARY7254 CLEAR RIDGE - OVER PD FINAL UT BILL - REFUND$100.00
Check Nbr 034204 CLEARY, JAMES - MARY$100.00
19/9/2020034205 CONNEXUS ENERGY7087 20TH AVE - WATER TOWER - SERV THRU 8-26-20$26.53
19/9/2020034205 CONNEXUS ENERGYSTREET LIGHTS - 395653-219699 - SERV THRU 8-26-20$64.19
19/9/2020034205 CONNEXUS ENERGY2085 W CEDAR ST - SERV THRU 8-26-20$394.63
19/9/2020034205 CONNEXUS ENERGYSTREET LIGHTS - 395653-219678 - SERV THRU 8-26-20-$52.71
19/9/2020034205 CONNEXUS ENERGY6900 20TH AVE - LIFT STATION - SERV THRU 8-26-20$73.96
19/9/2020034205 CONNEXUS ENERGY6800 20TH AVE FOR SCADA - SERV THRU 8-26-20$7.14
19/9/2020034205 CONNEXUS ENERGY6800 20TH AVE FOR SCADA - SERV THRU 8-26-20$7.13
19/9/2020034205 CONNEXUS ENERGY7100-20TH AVE - TRAFSG - SERV THRU 8-26-20$82.00
Check Nbr 034205 CONNEXUS ENERGY$602.87
19/9/2020034206 CORE & MAIN510M S/POINT M2 - GOES OVER TOUCH PAD FOR METER REA$3,524.83
Check Nbr 034206 CORE & MAIN$3,524.83
19/9/2020034207 DAVID KILLIANREIMBURSE FOR INVESTIGATIVE WORK TO DETERIN SEWER $238.87
Check Nbr 034207 DAVID KILLIAN$238.87
19/9/2020034208 GOPHER STATE ONE CALL INCSERVICES THROUGH 8-31-20$91.80
19/9/2020034208 GOPHER STATE ONE CALL INCSERVICES THROUGH 8-31-20$91.80
Check Nbr 034208 GOPHER STATE ONE CALL INC$183.60
19/9/2020034209 HALLFIED CONTROLS INC.INTERCONNECT METERS TO SCADA$400.00
19/9/2020034209 HALLFIED CONTROLS INC.INTERCONNECT METERS TO SCADA$400.00
Check Nbr 034209 HALLFIED CONTROLS INC.$800.00
19/9/2020034210 HUSIENGA, JAMESREIMBURSE FOR STEEL TOE WORK BOOTS PER UNION CONT$170.00
Check Nbr 034210 HUSIENGA, JAMES$170.00
19/9/2020034211 IMAGE PRINTING & GRAPHICSAC BUSINESS / NON- PROFIT GRANT - 80# WHITE COVER - C$35.35
Check Nbr 034211 IMAGE PRINTING & GRAPHICS$35.35
19/9/2020034212 KENNETH A. TOLZMANN, SAMA3RD QTR BILL - PROPERTY TAX ASSESSMENTS$4,658.75
Check Nbr 034212 KENNETH A. TOLZMANN, SAMA$4,658.75
19/9/2020034213 LEGACY TITLE1838 DUPRE RD - OVER PD FINAL UT BILL$101.34
Check Nbr 034213 LEGACY TITLE$101.34
19/9/2020034214 LEO A DALYCENTERVILLE CITY HALL BIDDING$1,356.00
Check Nbr 034214 LEO A DALY$1,356.00
19/9/2020034215 LOFFLER COMPANIESP.W. COPIER PER CONTRACT$67.83
Check Nbr 034215 LOFFLER COMPANIES$67.83
19/9/2020034216 MN DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH3RD QTR WATER TESTING FEES$3,129.84
Check Nbr 034216 MN DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH$3,129.84
19/9/2020034217 MR SIGNSTREET SIGNS - LESS 59.90 FOR RETURNED SIGNS (WRONG $536.14
19/9/2020034217 MR SIGNSTREET SIGNS - TWIN LAKES & 72 1/2 STREET$69.01
09/04/20 1:39 PM
CITY OF CENTERVILLE
Page 3
Check Detail - August 27 Sept. 9, 2020
Check
DateCheck #Vender NameCommentsAmount
Check Nbr 034217 MR SIGN$605.15
19/9/2020034218 MY HOLDING, INC. DBA FIRST IMPFOGGING TREATMENT FOR VIRUS/BACTERIA/ETC. P.W & CIT$1,539.90
Check Nbr 034218 MY HOLDING, INC. DBA FIRST IMP$1,539.90
19/9/2020034219 NATIONWIDE RETIREMENT SOLUTIONDEF COMP W/H - PAY PERIOD 18$1,083.33
Check Nbr 034219 NATIONWIDE RETIREMENT SOLUTION$1,083.33
19/9/2020034220 PRESS PUBLICATIONSPUBLIC HEARING - WELLHEAD PROTECTION PLAN$44.33
Check Nbr 034220 PRESS PUBLICATIONS$44.33
19/9/2020034221 PROLIFIC PROP. LLC.1995 ROBIN LN N - OVER PD FINAL UT BILL$96.56
Check Nbr 034221 PROLIFIC PROP. LLC.$96.56
19/9/2020034222 REPUBLIC SERVICES, INC.RECYCLING SERVICES$4,362.95
19/9/2020034222 REPUBLIC SERVICES, INC.GARBAGE SERVICES$16,230.88
Check Nbr 034222 REPUBLIC SERVICES, INC.$20,593.83
19/9/2020034223 RESULTS TITLE*2071 WILLOW CIR - OVER PD FINAL UT BILL$102.76
Check Nbr 034223 RESULTS TITLE*$102.76
19/9/2020034224 RESULTS TITLE**1858 PRAIRIE DR - OVER PD FINAL UT BILL$96.07
Check Nbr 034224 RESULTS TITLE**$96.07
19/9/2020034225 SECURITY CONTROL SYSTEMS, INC.BASIC MONTITORING FEE FOR CITY HALL - ALARM SYSTEM$240.00
Check Nbr 034225 SECURITY CONTROL SYSTEMS, INC.$240.00
19/9/2020034226 STANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES IN2020 CITY HALL RENOVATIONS - SERV THRU 731-20$8,825.75
19/9/2020034226 STANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES INBAY VIEW VILLAS - SERV THRU 7-31-20$1,398.90
19/9/2020034226 STANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES INGENERAL - SERV THRU 7-31-20$375.00
19/9/2020034226 STANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES IN2019 D.T. STREET AND UT IMPROVEMENTS - SERV THRU 7-3$10,139.96
19/9/2020034226 STANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES IN2019 D.T. STREET AND UT IMPROVEMENTS - SERV THRU 7-3$32,954.86
19/9/2020034226 STANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES INLAMOTTE PARK IRRIGATION EXPANSION - SERV THRU 7-31-2$2,331.50
19/9/2020034226 STANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES INRESIDENTAL DRIVEWAYS - SERV THRU 7-31-20$1,773.25
19/9/2020034226 STANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES IN2019 D.T. STREET AND UT IMPROVEMENTS - SERV THRU 7-3$7,604.97
Check Nbr 034226 STANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES IN$65,404.19
19/9/2020034227 SUN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANYSEPT. 2020 LIFE INS$99.39
19/9/2020034227 SUN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANYSEPT. 2020 SHORT TERM DISABILITY INS$146.06
Check Nbr 034227 SUN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY$245.45
19/9/2020034228 TASCADMINISTRATION FEE - COBRA - 10-1-20 THRU 10-31-20$10.00
Check Nbr 034228 TASC$10.00
19/9/2020034229 TOKLE INSPECTIONS, INC.ELECTRICAL INPECTIONS SERV THRU 8-1-20 THRU 8-31-20$516.80
Check Nbr 034229 TOKLE INSPECTIONS, INC.$516.80
19/9/2020034230 USA BLUE BOOKFLAGS - BLUE & GREEN WITH STAND$127.61
19/9/2020034230 USA BLUE BOOKFLAGS - BLUE & GREEN WITH STAND$127.61
Check Nbr 034230 USA BLUE BOOK$255.22
19/9/2020034231 WATERMARK TITLE*7176 PETERSON TRAIL - OVER PD FINAL UT BILL$20.24
Check Nbr 034231 WATERMARK TITLE*$20.24
$832,698.11
CENTENNIAL LAKES POLICE DEPTCheck Register - Police GL without invoice numbersPage: 1
Check Issue Dates: 8/31/2020 - 9/2/2020Sep 02, 2020 08:29PM
Report Criteria:
Report type: Summary
GLCheckCk NoDescriptionCheck
PeriodIssue DatePayeeAmount
09/2009/02/202013379ASPEN MILLS, INCUNIFORM STARS CHIEF734.20
09/2009/02/202013380AXON ENTERPRISE, INCTASER X26P BASIC YEAR 4 PMT1,320.00
09/2009/02/202013381BCA TRAININGDMT-G RECERTIFICATION KM75.00
09/2009/02/202013382BARNUM GATE SERVICES, INCGATE ISSUE DUE TO RECIEVER PRO410.52
09/2009/02/202013383EMERGENCY CONTRACTORSSEPT MONTHLY LANDSCAPE SERVIC815.00
09/2009/02/202013384GARY L FISCHLER & ASSOCIATES, PAPRE-EMP TESTING LL650.00
09/2009/02/202013385HOLIDAY COMPANIESVEHICLE WASHES181.50
09/2009/02/202013386MN CHIEFS OF POLICE ASSOCPERMIT TO ACQUIRE FORMS37.50
09/2009/02/202013387MHSRC/RANGEPIT HYBRID TS/HL1,190.00
09/2009/02/202013388MY HOLDINGS INCTREATMENT FOR VIRUSES/BACTERI576.00
09/2009/02/202013389NACINSTALL GPS FC 48 UNITS2,020.00
09/2009/02/202013390PITNEY BOWES GLOBAL FINANCIAL3RD QTR POSTAGE METER LEASE61.59
09/2009/02/202013391VERIZON WIRELESSSQUAD LAPTOP CHGS AUGUST1,738.49
09/2009/02/20202020033DELTA DENTALACH SEPT DENTAL1,232.80
08/2008/31/20202020034U S BANKVISA ACH-VEH MATS447.53
Grand Totals:11,490.13
Checks #13376-13378 Payroll
M = Manual Check, V = Void Check
CENTENNIAL LAKES POLICE DEPTCheck Register - Police GL without invoice numbersPage: 1
Check Issue Dates: 8/21/2020 - 8/25/2020Aug 25, 2020 10:54AM
Report Criteria:
Report type: Summary
GLCheckCk NoDescriptionCheck
PeriodIssue DatePayeeAmount
08/2008/25/202013368ANOKA CO TREASURY OFFICEMHZ RADIO BATTERIES/ANTENNA206.25
08/2008/25/202013369DON'S CIRCLE SERVICE2020 EXPLORER OIL CHANGE289.45
08/2008/25/202013370KENNEDY & GRAVEN, CHARTEREDJULY LEGAL CLAIM1,002.50
08/2008/25/202013371MY HOLDINGS INCTREATMENT FOR VIRUSES/BACTERI168.00
08/2008/25/202013372OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH CENTERSPRE EMP EXAM LL474.50
08/2008/25/202013373OFFICE OF MN IT SERVICESWAN SERVICES JULY40.60
08/2008/25/202013374POPP COMUNICATIONSDSL LINE FOR WIFI70.90
08/2008/25/202013375STREICHER'S, INCCOLLAR INSIGNIA STARS15.98
Grand Totals:2,268.18
M = Manual Check, V = Void Check
CENTENNIAL FIRE DISTRICTCheck Register - FIRE GLPage: 1
Check Issue Dates: 8/26/2020 - 9/2/2020Sep 03, 2020 08:11AM
Report Criteria:
Report type: Summary
GLCheckCheckVendorDescriptionCheck
PeriodIssue DateNumberNumberPayeeAmount
09/2009/02/2020889110850ANOKA COUNTY TREASURY DESept Broadband (CAC Fiber)112.50
09/2009/02/2020889260650FRATTALLONE'S HARDWARE SSckt Ext, Cord Starter, Mechanic 20.03
09/2009/02/20208893160150PEARSON EDUCATION, INC6 "MyLab BRADY" etexts521.16
09/2009/02/20208894200150THOMAS MOTORS, INC'13 F250 SD Resc 11 Service170.00
09/2009/02/20208895220200VERIZON WIRELESS7/16-8/15 Mobile Broadband & Mo210.08
08/2008/31/2020202002260290FIRE RELIEF ASSOCIATION2020 Annual Pension Payment25,500.00
09/2009/02/2020202002340045DELTA DENTALSept EMS Coord. Dental Ins Prem 42.15
09/2009/02/20202020024210300US BANKDominos1,495.02
Grand Totals: 28,070.94
M = Manual Check, V = Void Check
ESCROW AGREEMENT
AND
RIGHT OF ENTRY AND CONSTRUCTION AGREEMENT
This Escrow Agreement and Right of Entry
dated September 9, 2020, is between the property owner(s), Jason Allen Cramer
and Tressa Marian Cramer (ity of Centerville, Minnesota, (
1880 Main Street, Centerville, Minnesota 55038.
WHEREAS, the parties desire to escrow Funds with the City in connection with a
transaction involving the sale, purchase and/or mortgaging of
abstract property situated in the County of Anoka, State of Minnesota and is described as
follows: Lots 10 and 11, Block 6, Centerville, Anoka County, Minnesota.
NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the various agreements between the
parties and the mutual covenants set forth in this instrument, the parties agree as follows:
1.Contemporaneously with the execution of this agreement herein, the
undersigned parties direct the City to hold Fifteen Thousand Dollars
2.Purpose of the Agreement. The Funds are held for the following purpose:
At the time of sale, each parcel of real estate in the City must be connected
to the City water system, or else, moneys must be held in escrow for the
purpose of connecting the parcel to the water system. If moneys are held
for this purpose, the landowner must make this connection in a manner
approved by the City, and must grant the City permission to use said
moneys for that purpose if the parcel is not connected in the manner
approved by the City. If the City is required to connect the parcel to the
City water system, the moneys will be used by the City to reimburse its
costs related to connecting the parcel to the City water system. The Owner
agrees to apply the Funds for this purpose and to connect the real estate to
the City water system under these conditions.
3.Upon receipt of the Funds, the City shall deposit the Funds into a non-
interest earning escrow account with a national banking association or
other federally insured banking institution with which the City has
established a banking relationship.
4.The City shall continue to hold the Funds in said account until the earliest
of the following events, when the City shall distribute the remaining Funds
as set forth in paragraph 5.
a.
structures on the real estate to the City water system, as evidenced
Version 09012020-1
1
by a physical inspection performed by
or designee.
b.The Automatic Termination Date of the Escrow is calculated as
follows:
i.The real estate shall be connected to the City water system
no later than September 9, 2021; and,
ii.This period may extend to September 9, 2022, in the event
the Owner submits an application to develop the real estate
with the City. This application shall consist of either a
building permit application or a subdivision application.
5.Distribution of Escrow Funds:
a.If, at the Automatic Termination Date, any Funds remain in the
escrow account, they shall be released to the City for the purpose
of connecting the real estate to the City water system in the manner
set forth in paragraph 6.
b.If, prior to the Automatic Termination Date, Owner submits the
following documentation to the City, the City is authorized by all
parties to immediately release Funds as set forth in paragraph (c),
below:
i.Owner to submit and gain approval of a plan to connect the
real estate to the City water system; and,
ii.Licensed contractor(s) to obtain permit(s) to execute the
approved plan, referenced above.
c.Release of Funds prior to Automatic Termination Date:
i.To licensed contractor(s); the City shall make partial and
periodic payments to contractor(s) until the purpose of this
Agreement is completed. Thereafter, remaining Funds to
Owner.
6.Right of Entry and Construction. In the event the City is required to
connect the real estate to the City water system, the Owner grants the City
and its employees, agents, and contractors the right of entry to the real
estate and any structures on the real estate to effectuate such connection;
and, similarly grants permission to temporarily or permanently change and
alter the land or structures to effectuate this connection. The Owner agrees
to compensate and reimburse the City for all of its connection costs,
including, but not limited to collateral costs such as permits, planning,
engineering, administrative, and legal fees. The City shall first apply the
Funds toward this purpose, however, in the event of a shortfall of Funds,
the Owner grants the City permission to assess the real estate to effectuate
the purposes of this Agreement.
7.The City shall be liable only to hold the Funds and to deliver it to the
parties named in this Agreement in accordance with the provisions of this
Agreement. It is understood that by acceptance of this Agreement, the
Version 09012020-1
2
City is only acting in the capacity of a depository, and it shall not be liable
or responsible to anyone for any damages, loss or expense unless caused
by the negligence or willful malfeasance of the City.
8.In the event of any disagreement among any of the parties to this
Agreement, or among any of them and any other person, resulting in
adverse claims and demands being made in connection with or for any
property involved in or affected by this Agreement, the City shall be
entitled to refuse to comply with any such claims or demands as long as
the disagreement continues, and in refusing, shall make no delivery or
other disposition of any property then held by it under this Agreement, and
in so doing, the City shall not become liable for such refusal. The City
shall be entitled to continue to refrain from acting until (a) the right of
adverse claimants is finally settled by binding arbitration or finally
adjudicated in a court assuming jurisdiction of the property involved in
this Agreement or affected by this Agreement or (b) all differences are
adjusted by agreement and the City is notified in writing of such an
agreement signed by the other parties to this Agreement. Furthermore, the
City shall have the right, at any time after a dispute between Owner and its
mortgagor, or between either of them and any other person has arisen, to
pay the Funds into any court of competent jurisdiction for payment to the
appropriate party, at which point
Agreement shall terminate.
9.Owner agrees to indemnify the City against all losses, claims, damages,
liability, and expenses, including, without limitation, costs or investigation
and legal counsel fees which may be imposed on the City or incurred by
the City in connection with the performance of its duties under this
Agreement, including, without limitation, any litigation arising from this
Agreement or involving the subject matter of this Agreement, except as to
negligence or willful malfeasance of the City.
10.Wherever any notice is required or permitted under this Agreement, the
notice shall be in writing and shall be deemed given on personal delivery
or upon mailing in the United States Mail, registered or certified mail,
return receipt requested, postage prepaid, to the addresses set out below or
at other addresses as specified by written notice delivered in accordance
with this Agreement:
a.Owner:Jason and Tressa Cramer
23057 West Martin Lake Drive NE
Stacy, MN 55079
With Copy to jasoncramer@msn.com
b.City:City of Centerville
Attention: City Administrator, Mark Statz
1880 Main Street
Version 09012020-1
3
Centerville, MN 55038
With Copy to MStatz@centervillemn.com
11.Miscellaneous.
a.Assignment/Enforcement. This Agreement shall be binding upon
the parties hereto and their respective successors and assigns;
provided, however, that such assignment has been acknowledged
in writing, by all parties.
b.Amendment. This Agreement can be amended or modified only by
a writing signed by the parties hereto.
c.Jurisdiction. This Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the
State of Minnesota.
d.Counterpart. This Agreement may be executed in multiple original
counterparts, duly executed by City and Owner provided, however,
this Agreement shall not become binding upon the City until it has
received manually executed original copies of the same from each
of the foregoing named parties and the City has accepted the same
and delivered copies of said executed Agreement to each of said
parties.
e.Terms. If there be more than one person designated herein, the
verbs and pronouns associated therewith, although expressed in the
singular, shall be read and construed as plural.
f.Severability. In the even that any provision of this Agreement, of
part thereof, shall be held to be void or unenforceable by a final,
non-appealable order entered by a court of competent jurisdiction,
such determination shall not affect or impair the enforceability of
the remaining portions of this Agreement.
g.Authority. Each party hereto represents and warrants to the other
parties hereto that it has full power and authority to execute this
Agreement and to perform or cause to be performed the obligations
on its part to be performed.
h.Computation of Time. In the computation of a period of time, if
any, expressed in this Agreement, the day of the act or event from
which said period of time runs shall be excluded and the last day of
such period shall be included, unless it falls on a Saturday, Sunday,
or legal holiday observed by the recording office of the county in
which the real estate is located, in which case the period shall be
deemed to run until the end of the next day, which is not a
Saturday, Sunday, or such legal holiday.
i.Captions. The captions contained in this Agreement are for
convenience only and are not part of the terms, provisions, or
conditions of this Agreement.
j.Entire Agreement. This Agreement constitutes the entire
agreement of the parties hereto and supersedes any prior or
contemporaneous agreements, representations, or understandings,
whether written or oral.
Version 09012020-1
4
OWNER
By _______________________________________
Jason Cramer
OWNER
By _______________________________________
Tressa Cramer
\[REMAINDER OF PAGE LEFT BLANK\]
Version 09012020-1
5
CITY OF CENTERVILLE
By _______________________________________
D.Love, Mayor
Attest:
By _______________________________________
Teresa Bender, City Clerk
\[REMAINDER OF PAGE LEFT BLANK\]
Version 09012020-1
6
CITY OF CENTERVILLE
REQUEST FOR
COUNCIL ACTION
Agenda Item # Department: Requested Council Meeting Date:
September 9, 2020
Finance
VIII.1
TITLE OF ISSUE:
General Fund Budget
BACKGROUND AND SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION:
At the last CC work session, the Council reviewed our draft, preliminary budget. There are several updates or
discussion items that should be addressed before we are required to submit our Preliminary Budget at the end of
the month. A few of those are:
- EDA Budget (proposed 2021 budget attached)
- Centennial Fire Dist. Budget (CFD adopted a 0% budget increase recently)
- Capital Fund Contingency (further discussion on specifics)
The memo and summary budget has been updated with the new fire contract information, however, the attached
General Fund Budget Spreadsheet has NOT; It is simply included for reference.
COST AND SOURCE(S) OF FUNDING:
TBD
REQUESTED COUNCIL ACTION:
Discussion item only. No formal action requested at this time.
SUPPORTED DOCUMENTS ATTACHED
Motion By: ____________________________________
Resolution Ordinance Contract Minutes Plan Map
Second By: ____________________________________
Vote Record: Aye Nay
_____
_____
Prelim 2021 Budget
Other (specify) ____________
_____ _____ Love
_____ _____
EDA Prelim 2021 Budget
_______________________________________________________________
_____ _____ Koski
_____ _____ Montain _______________________________________________________________
Administration Department Use:
Refer to: _________________________________
Consent
Tabled Until: ______________________________
Regular
Other: ___________________________________
12.3086.00
140.00150.00
Budget
1,000.001,000.00
2,388.30
$$$$$$$$$
$$
Remaining
s
137.70500.00300.00700.00750.00500.00150.00200.00
1,800.004,914.005,200.003,600.008,060.00
26,811.70
Expenditure
$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
DateAnticipated
to
$
Spent
750.00500.00
800.00700.00
Amount
1,950.001,000.001,000.005,000.00
17,500.0029,200.00
$$$$$$$$
$$$
Budget
@
ea.)
wk.
weeks
@$50ea)
Study
per
52
1
Report
to
weeks
$1440=$720
Center
offer
52
of
1
back
x
Data
Status
for
50%
wk
cut
(
x
w/2
(2x
Could
ad
Budget
8/19/2020
Corridor
Consulting
EDA
Tech
B&W
yearparticipants
Description MNparticipation27*($105+77)=49144x6$155/wk.
2020
MembershipEvents
Program
MARKETERSCenterStageMARKETERSMisc.
(Future)
Attendance
Ad
Program5
EventMembership
STREETSTREET
House
ChamberChamber
Sign
diems1
PerFICANoneACREDACREDNoneOpenNoneNoneNoneNoneXcipioNoneNoneBannersNoneMAINMAINBlueNewspaperQuadQuad
etc.)
etc.)
p
)
surveys,
etc.
elements,
Partnershi
sketches
printing,
sites)
studies,
streetscaping
Development
(Advertisements)
owned
(site
consulting,
signs,
city
Land
Economic
Studies
study;
(graphic
advisory)
owned
(banners,
House
Regional
City
(retail
Support
for
(general
Open
Study
ItemExpenditures
Purchases
County
Expenses
Fees
Diems
Budget SubtotalSubtotalSubtotalSubtotal Legal SubtotalSubtotalSubtotal Misc.Subtotal Totals
Per Subtotal AnokaBusinessMarketingEngineering/Planning Subtotal MarketCapitalRebranding
CITY OF CENTERVILLE
REQUEST FOR
COUNCIL ACTION
Agenda Item # Department: Requested Council Meeting Date:
September 9, 2020
Finance
VIII.2.a
TITLE OF ISSUE:
CARES Act Funding Allocation Plan
BACKGROUND AND SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION:
At a recent City council work session, an outline of potential CARES Act Funding allocations was presented.
Since then, staff has made adjustments to that plan, based on that discussion and other recent information.
Changes are noted in blue text on the attached.
COST AND SOURCE(S) OF FUNDING:
$304,902 in CARES Act Funding to be allocated
REQUESTED COUNCIL ACTION:
Discussion item only. No formal action required at this time.
SUPPORTED DOCUMENTS ATTACHED
Motion By: ____________________________________
Resolution Ordinance Contract Minutes Plan Map
Second By: ____________________________________
Vote Record: Aye Nay
_____
_____
CARES Act Funding Allocation Plan
Other (specify) ____________
_____ _____ Love
_____ _____
_______________________________________________________________
_____ _____ Koski
_____ _____ Montain _______________________________________________________________
Administration Department Use:
Refer to: _________________________________
Consent
Tabled Until: ______________________________
Regular
Other: ___________________________________
CARESActFundingAllocationPlan
9/9/2020
CommentsandSubtotals
COVIDExpensesToDateProjectedthru11/15Total
CityDirect
Handsanitizer,plexiglas,professionalcleaning,laptops,
remotePCsoftware,Zoom,cellphoneandinternet
serviceforremotework,additionalportajohn
maintenance,engineeringrelatedtostreetprojshut
down,truckmaint.onthosethatweretobereplaced,
parkclosuresignage,otherdirectlyinvoicedCOVID
expenses,etc.
GeneralReceipts15,000.00$$15,000.00$30,000.00
DelayduetoCenterPointCOVIDpolicy
StreetProjectChangeOrder$22,255.68$22,255.68
StaffsalariesforPWrotationof2on2off.Wehave
quantified%oftimeduring"off"weekswheretheywere
productiveandwilldeductthat.
PWStaffIdleorQuarantineTime25,000.00$$25,000.00$50,000.00
Staffsalaireswhensenthomeduetopotentialexposure.
Staffsalarieswhencompletingsubstantiallydifferent
tasks,duetoCOVID.Added$40,000here.
CityHallIdleorQuarantineTime25,000.00$$25,000.00$50,000.00
Frontcountermodificationstoenhancesanitation
OfficeRemodel(COVIDrelated)$$10,000.00$10,000.00
Potentialofficearearemodel(notpartofcurrentbid)to
addofficewallsforcityclerk,toincreasesocial
distancing,etc.Added$15,000here.
Addn'lOfficeRemodel(COVID)$$35,000.00$35,000.00
$197,255.68
CLPD
CLPDhasestimatedtheirdirectcostsandsomestafftime
tobeintherangeof$100ktotal.CARESActguidance
allowsforalmostanypublicsafetyexpensetoqualify.
Thisisoursharebasedonthefundingformula.
CentervilleShareof$100k$$32,790.00$32,790.00
$32,790.00
CFD
CFDhasestimatedtheirdirectcostsandsomestafftime
tobeintherangeof$100ktotal.Stafftimewillinclude
Jerry'ssalaryduetohisroleasanemergencymanager.
CARESActguidanceallowsforalmostanypublicsafety
expensetoqualify.Thisisoursharebasedonthefunding
formula.
CentervilleShareof$100k$$45,100.00$45,100.00
$45,100.00
NMTV
NMTVhastalliedexpensesof$17,000todate;.$583is
ourshare.Eliminatedfuturecosts;NMTVdoesnot
anticipate.
CentervilleShareof$30k+/$583.00$$583.00
$583.00
CentennialSchools
CentennialSchoolshasnotmadeaspecificrequest.Their
unmetneedsaremuchmorethanthecitiescouldcover.
Weareworkingwithothercitiescoveredbythedistrict
tofigureoutanappropriateamount.Then,dividethat
amountbasedonenrollment.Ourcitizensmakeup
10.5%ofenrollment.$10kisjustaplaceholderfornow.
Staffproposesthattheschoolbeallocatedanyunused
fundsattheendofthereportingperiod.
Centervilleis10.5%ofenrollment$$10,000.00$10,000.00
$10,000.00
St.John'sHospital
8/26discussionremovedthisfromthelist
BasedonCVResidentUsageStats$$$
$
EDA
BlueLogoSign,CenterStageProgramsinitiatedin
responsetoCOVIDtoassistlocalBusinesses.Added
funds($5,865)heretopayforyearlongadpackage.
BlueLogoSign,CenterStage$$15,600.00$15,600.00
$15,600.00
BusinessReliefGrants
CARESActFundingAllocationPlan
9/9/2020
Thecounty'sgrantprogramwasundersubscribed,bya
widemargin.Thismeansthatanysmallbusinessthat
metthefederalrequirementsforCARESActdollarshave
hadanopportunitytogetfundingthroughthecounty.
Wehave,therefore,eliminatedagrantprogramthrough
thecity.
10%allocationhasbeentypical$$$
$
$87,838.68$213,490.00$301,328.68
CARESActTotalFunding$304,902
NetCostsor(FundsRemaining)(3,573.32)$
CITY OF CENTERVILLE
REQUEST FOR
COUNCIL ACTION
Agenda Item # Department: Requested Council Meeting Date:
September 9, 2020
Finance
VIII.2.b
TITLE OF ISSUE:
CARES Act Funding - September Submittal
BACKGROUND AND SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION:
In order to retain the funds received through the CARES Act, the city must submit our expenses to the federal
government in a process similar to what happens after a natural disaster, like flood, etc.
Staff would like the City Council to approve the list of qualified expenses prior to submittal, each month. Staff
is still working on this month's submittal, so we will email it out to the Council as soon as it is ready, but prior
to Wednesday's meeting, for your review.
COST AND SOURCE(S) OF FUNDING:
TBD
REQUESTED COUNCIL ACTION:
Motion to approve the September CARES Act expense submittal.
SUPPORTED DOCUMENTS ATTACHED
Motion By: ____________________________________
Resolution Ordinance Contract Minutes Plan Map
Second By: ____________________________________
Vote Record: Aye Nay
_____
_____
CARES Act Expense Submittal - September
Other (specify) ____________
_____ _____ Love
_____ _____
_______________________________________________________________
_____ _____ Koski
_____ _____ Montain _______________________________________________________________
Administration Department Use:
Refer to: _________________________________
Consent
Tabled Until: ______________________________
Regular
Other: ___________________________________
CITY OF CENTERVILLE
REQUEST FOR
COUNCIL ACTION
Agenda Item # Department: Requested Council Meeting Date:
September 9, 2020
Public Works
VIII.3
TITLE OF ISSUE:
Wellhead Protection Plan - Part 2
BACKGROUND AND SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION:
If there were no comments from the public hearing which will require major revisions to the WHPP Part 2, the
council should consider recommending that the plan be sent to the Minnesota Department of Health for review
and approval. After MDH's approval, the city would formally adopt the plan and begin using it.
COST AND SOURCE(S) OF FUNDING:
Costs for preparation of WHPP Part 2 previously approved. Future costs are detailed in the plan.
REQUESTED COUNCIL ACTION:
Motion to authorize submittal of the WHPP Part 2 to the MDH for review and approval.
SUPPORTED DOCUMENTS ATTACHED
Motion By: ____________________________________
Resolution Ordinance Contract Minutes Plan Map
Second By: ____________________________________
Vote Record: Aye Nay
_____
_____
WHPP Part 2 (draft)
Other (specify) ____________
_____ _____ Love
_____ _____
_______________________________________________________________
_____ _____ Koski
_____ _____ Montain _______________________________________________________________
Administration Department Use:
Refer to: _________________________________
Consent
Tabled Until: ______________________________
Regular
Other: ___________________________________
September 9, 2020
ADMINISTRATION
COVID-19 Response
A number of COVID related assistance programs are now available for both residents and
businesses. We are putting as much information out on these as possible. Below is
information on a housing assistance program. Later in this report is information on a
business and non-profit relief program, through Anoka County. Please help spread the
word.
City Hall
City Hall will continue to be closed to the public while community-based transmission of
most recent directives, we will also be
continuing to have staff work from home, as noted, even for Critical Sector employees,
those who can, must telework.
Meetings
All Committee and Commission meetings (P&Z, P&R, EDA, and CC) will continue to be
held via Zoom videoconferencing. The meetings are also broadcast live on North Metro
TV and streamed on their website. Additionally, meeting connection information is being
posted on the website and will be widely distributed so that the public can join.
ELECTIONS
Elections
Absentee/Early voting for the General Election begins September 18, 2020 here at City Hall.
We are anticipating that we will have higher than normal turnouts for phases of the General
Election cycle as it is a Presidential Election, Anoka County Commissioner race and Municipal
Elections. There are more things on the ballot but those are the larger ones that most residents
are concerned with.
We and the County have attempted to push for the Absentee/Early voting to keep the polls to
a level that we can handle for COVID-19 sake (sanitizing, PPE, etc.).
Two staff members are well trained to handle the Absentee/Early voting here at City Hall and
if need be we will pull from our trained Judges to assist.
Preliminary discussions are being had regarding the possibility of having volunteers available
to sanitize booths and equipment at the polls between voters.
General Election Opportunities to Vote are as follows:
(46 days prior to Election Day Absentee Votin
and external envelope)
(7 days prior to Election Day Direct Ballollot and place in the
voting machine)
r 30, 2020, City Hall
ovember 3, 2020, Church of St.
p.m.
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
Economic Development Authority
(EDA)
CenterStage
Some recent posts include:
Centerville Tobacco
Centerville Floral
1737 Main Street
A realty sign has now been placed on the site and Mr. Brass is free to market the site to
potential developers.
Interstate Blue Logo Sign Program
Businesses have now committed to participation in the Blue Sign program, including:
Korner Express
Wiseguys Pizza
CenterMart
in the costs for the first year of having
the business logos placed on the blue signs on the interstate. Since there is no sign for our
exit, it may take several months to get the signs put up, due to a backlog of work and
material delays.
2021 Budget
The EDA discussed its preliminary 2021 Budget at its meeting on 8/19 and informally agreed
to request an increase in their annual allocation to help support ongoing programs, such as the
Blue Logo Sign Program and CenterStage as well as provide a small amount of capital to fund
some streetscaping elements like banners, etc.
Minnesota Technology Corridor
The Excipio Data Center Feasibility Study kicked off with an initial meeting on 8/25.
The meeting reviewed the scope and schedule for the project, which should take about 8
weeks. The study is looking at the viability of a data cente
industrial zone and is being funded in partnership with Connexus Energy, Comcast and
Small Business Relief Grants (DEED)
Grant recipients are being notified, but a complete list of them is not yet available.
Quad Area Chamber of Commerce
Lunch & Learns
The Quad Area Chamber of Commerce hosted an in-person lunch
and learn event on September 1 at Running Aces Hotel. Billy
Hanisch shared his story of how his social media account turned a
simple act
of kindness into a booming
business that helped him get
through the COVID crisis. Hanisch
bakery had offered to bake cakes
for local graduates who were
missing out on graduation parties.
In a matter of days, he had dozens
of donors who wanted to pay for
cakes for graduates in their cities.
Anoka County Regional Economic Development (ACRED)
Anoka County Regional Economic Development held their first annual North Metro
nd
Summit, via videoconference on September 2.
The Marketing Subcommittee continues to plan for scheduled events in the fall of 2020 in
conjunction with the MN Real Estate Journal. Some events are being converted into
virtual experiences. Below is a list of events being sponsored by ACRED and their current
status:
th
Land Development Summit (in-person) September 11 8:00 AM -12:00 PM
th
UpRiver Real Estate Event (in-person) October 15 8:30 AM -11:00 AM
th
MNCAR Expo (in-person) October 29 3:00 PM -7:00 PM
th
Industrial Summit (in-person) November 13 8:00 AM -12:00 PM
th
Redevelopment Summit (in-person) November 19 8:00 AM -12:00 PM
Business 4 Business
Greater MSP, the Minnesota Consortium of Community Developers (MCCD) and
Counties are joining together with other partners, like local Chambers of Commerce to
develop a program called Business 4 Business. The program will rely on donations from
businesses who are successfully navigating the current crisis. Then, small businesses, of
less than 20 employees, a non-home based location and less than $1 M in annual revenue
will be allowed to apply for grants of $7,500 and/or technical assistance, funded through
that pool of money.
Anoka County Business Relief Grant Program
Anoka County has now announced and extension to their Business and Non-Profit Relief
Grant Program. The new application window is September 8 - 18. The first round of
applications was highly undersubscribed; in other words, there was more money, than
encourage more applications.
FINANCE
COVID-19 Relief Programs
The city has now received our federal funds for COVID-19 relief of $304,902. The funds
come to cities, through the CARES Act, offsetting expenses related to the pandemic. City
staff have evaluated expenses to date and those anticipated through November 15, 2020. A
draft plan for allocation of these funds has been presented to the city council. Proposed
funding may include:
Direct expenses (hand sanitizer, PPE, remote work expenses, etc.)
Construction project delay expenses
City Hall renovation costs to adapt to COVID
Police and Fire Department direct expenses and diverted staff time
Public works and city hall diverted staff time
School District Relief
North Metro TV direct expenses
The deadline for expending these funds is November 15, 2020.
2021 Budget
The City Council has been working hard on putting together the 2021 General Fund Budget
and Tax Levies. The most recently presented drafts would raise the levy by less than 1%. A
Preliminary Budget will be adopted by the City Council at its September 23 meeting. From
there, the budget and levies may be reduced, but not increased, prior to adoption of the final
versions in December.
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
Old Mill Estates
Construction on Phase II of the project has begun. Connection to the sewer in Old Mill Road
was made. Sewer and water mains will be constructed throughout next week with storm sewer
and street construction to follow.
Apartment Complex Concept Plan
The Planning and Zoning Commission was presented with a concept plan for a 3-story, 96-
thst
unit apartment complex sited on commercially zoned land between 20 and 21 Avenues,
north of Main Street. The project would require a Comprehensive Plan Amendment and
Rezoning. If the developer chooses to pursue these land use requests, a public hearing
would be scheduled to receive community input on the proposal.
th
Centerville Storage (20Ave. Mini Storage)
Utility installation is complete. Building construction will begin shortly.
Atlas Villas Memory Care Project (1825 Main Street)
Easement vacation was finalized at the August 26 City Council meeting. The development
is fully approved and ready for construction.
Bay View Villas
(Waterworks Site)
Irrigation systems are
being installed and the
developer is working on
finishing touches to the
development as home
construction continues.
Several residents have
now moved in!
7241 Main Street
The prospective developer of this property recently contacted the city to reengage in the
process of subdividing the property. We anticipate a sketch plan in the near future.
Block 7 Property
A prospective developer is in discussion with city staff on a high density townhome
development of the site, which could include roughly 18 to 24 units on the 1.6 acre site.
Development Inquiries
Developer looking to construct high density townhomes in downtown.
COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT
Web Site
Comments & Concerns from Public
Added CenterStage Ads
Signal timing
Reader Board
Social Media
Election Information
Music in the Park
Meeting Information
CenterStage
COVID-19 Information
Committee Meetings
Music in the Park
Anoka Co. Business Grant Info
Anoka Co. Business Grant Info
City-wide Clean-up Day
After canceling our originally scheduled City-wide Clean-up Day due to COVID, staff has
made some technology investments to reduce contact. A date of Saturday, October 11 has
been set for the rescheduled event.
Residential Outdoor Storage
In response to some citizen complaints and to help curb other disturbances in residential
districts, a city-wide compliance check was completed for vehicles parked in the front yard.
A total of 45 letters were sent to those in violation, asking them to move their vehicles off the
front lawn. A follow-up inspection was conducted at found about 50% compliance from
those who received the initial letter. The remaining half will receive another letter asking for
compliance.
Driveway and Parking Ordinance Review
The Planning and Zoning Commission continues to work diligently on issues related to what
and where certain vehicles can be parked on residential properties. Both the existing
ordinance and the one being contemplated by P&Z do not allow parking of any vehicles in
the front yard (not on the driveway).
Public Hearings Scheduled
The Planning and Zoning Commission has scheduled Public Hearings on ordinances related
to: Industrial District Outdoor Storage Requirements, Lawn Maintenance and Backyard
Chickens. The hearings will be held at the Planning and Zoning Commission meeting on
October 13, 2020.
Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Rescheduled
The regular meeting of the Planning and Zoning Commission has been rescheduled to
October 13, to avoid conflict with Nite to Unite.
officials was held on 8/4 and produced
positive momentum. We are hopeful that a plan can be developed to mitigate noise.
th
7129 20Ave.
A letter from the city attorney was issued to the business owner allowing a final
opportunity to abate the lighting issues.
PUBLIC WORKS/STREETS
City Hall Renovation
Crawford Merz was awarded the contract at the City Council meeting on August 26.
The project will include a renovation of the city council chambers, city hall lobby, and
some carpet and in-floor heating work in the city hall office area. A kick-off meeting
with the contractor is scheduled for the week of September 8.
COVID-19
All staff are healthy and on a regular work schedule.
STORMWATER/WETLAND
LaMotte Park Stormwater Reuse System Expansion
The contractor has mobilized to the site and will begin work shortly after Labor Day.
City staff met with the project engineer to field locate some of the sprinkler heads to be
installed.
SEWER AND WATER
Wellhead Protection Plan
The draft Part II plan has been sent to surrounding jurisdictions for comment. A Public
Hearing on the Plan is scheduled for September 9.
Water Main Interconnect
2020 Downtown Street and Utility Improvements
The contractor has now begun the installation of water services into homes that have
opted to hook to city water. The street construction crew has also reengaged in the project
and continues road building activities. The contractor expects to remain on site for the
duration of the project.
PARKS AND RECREATION
Committee Vacancy
The parks committee has one open seat and is looking for candidate. Please apply on the
Application for Committee Appointment
Music in the Park
Cindy Jo and Dirt Road Dixie performed to a good crowd on September 1, for the final
Music in the Park of the year. Thanks again to Tom Lee and Brian Peterson for all their hard
tion together on short notice.
Movie in the Park
The Parks and Recreation
Committee has scheduled its
annual Movie in the Park for
September 19, at dusk. The
movie will be the animated hit,
Toy Story 4.
Accessibility Improvements
The contractor has been given
the go-ahead to complete the trail
and access route paving needed
to bring our parks into
compliance with ADA requirements.
Adopt a Garden Program
will be forming and adopt a garden
program to help maintain flower gardens at
volunteering, please let us know by
emailing info@centervillemn.com
PUBLIC SAFETY
Night to Unite
Normally scheduled for the first week of August, a new Night to Unite date has been set for
October 6, 2020.
Centennial Lakes Police Department
COVID-19
All staff members are now healthy.
Centennial Fire District
Fire District Organizational Study
Consultant interviews with key fire department stakeholders were held the week of August
10. Work on the organizational study continues.
COVID-19
All fire staff are now healthy and able to respond to calls.
Duty Crew
The department is nearing employment agreements with duty crew hires to fill daytime
positions. These hires will shore up the departments daytime response capabilities and will
perform various maintenance and inspection work around the fire stations and throughout the
city.
Fire Steering Committee
The Fire Steering Committee met on August 27 to review the proposed 2021 budget. A zero
percent increase budget was adopted.