HomeMy WebLinkAbout2021-07-13 P & Z Packet
CITY OF CENTERVILLE
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
MEETING AGENDA
Tuesday, July 13, 2021
6:30 p.m.
Meeting is being held in-person!
Centerville City Hall
1880 Main Street
Centerville, MN 55038
Or you may join via
Videoconference links available at:
www.centervillemn.com
I. CALL TO ORDER
1. Roll Call
II. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
III. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
IV. PUBLIC HEARINGS (6:30 PM or shortly thereafter)
1. Sutton Transportation
a. Preliminary Plat
b. Conditional Use Permit
2.
3.
V. AWARDS, PRESENTATIONS, APPEARANCES
1. P&Z Commission Candidate Interviews
a. Richard Nelson
2. Block 7 Concept Plans Centra Homes
VI. OLD BUSINESS
1. None
VII. NEW BUSINESS
1. Sutton Transportation
a. Preliminary Plat
b. Conditional Use Permit
c. Site Plan Review
2.
3.
VIII.APPROVAL OF MINUTES
1. None
IX. ANNOUNCEMENTS/UPDATES
1. Council Member Liaison
2.
X. ADJOURNMENT
INFORMATION
None
REMINDERS
All meetings are now being held in person at City Hall.
Meetings may be live-streamed at https://northmetrotv.com/centerville-stream/ or you may
join the meeting via Zoom Video Conference. Links for the video conference may be found
www.centervillemn.com in the calendar tab.
All meetings begin at 6:30 PM unless otherwise noted.
Planning & Zoning Commissi
CITY OF CENTERVILLEREQUEST
FOR ACTION
Agenda Item # Department: RequestedMeetingDate:
July 13, 2021
Planning and Zoning
IV.1
TITLE OF ISSUE:
Public Hearing - Rehbein Industrial (Sutton Transport) - Preliminary Plat, Conditional Use Permit
BACKGROUND AND SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION:
The city is in receipt of applications from Sutton Transportation for a Preliminary Plat and Conditional Use
Permit for a cross-dock/warehouse facility in the city's industrial-zoned area south of Fairview and adjacent to
21st Avenue. A public hearing is required for both of these applications.
COST AND SOURCE(S) OF FUNDING:
N/A
REQUESTED ACTION:
Open the Public Hearing, take public input and close the public hearing.
SUPPORTED DOCUMENTS ATTACHED
Motion By: ____________________________________
Resolution Ordinance Contract Minutes Plan Map
Second By: ____________________________________
X
Vote Record: Aye Nay
_____
_____
Project Narrative, Project Plans, Plat,
Other (specify) ____________
_____
_____
_____ _____
Staff Review Memo
_______________________________________________________________
_____ _____
_____ ____________________________________________________________________
_____
_____
_____
_____
Refer to: _________________________________
Tabled Until: ______________________________
Consent
Other: ___________________________________
Regular
{ǒƷƷƚƓ ƩğƓƭƦƚƩƷ bğƩƩğƷźǝĻ May 24, 2021
th
Sutton Transport, Inc. was founded on November 19, 1979 and is a privately-held LTL regional common
carrier based in Weston, WI, whose focus is in interstate and intrastate transportation of general
commodities. Sutton prides itself with superior service with a personal touch.
Sutton Transport specializes in the following services:
LTL Trucking
Local Cartage
Full Truckloads
Lift Gate Delivery Service
Same Day Delivery Service
Nationwide Expedited Service
Their fleet consists of a combination of over 200 tractors and 350 trailers and an employer to nearly 500
people.
Currently Sutton Transport operates seven terminals throughout Wisconsin, Illinois and Minnesota.
s current facility in Maple Grove is inadequate for their planned growth. The Facility in
Clearwater Creek Business Park will be a step to aid in expanding their business in Minnesota.
Sutton Transport intends to purchase approximately 15 Acres of vacant land in the Clearwater Business
Park and construct a new cross-dock truck terminal industrial warehouse facility. The facility would
initially employ approximately 30 drivers and 8 office staff for dispatch and coordination requirements
and 8 warehouse personnel to load and unload trucks. We would hope to grow the number of jobs by
10-20% annually in the next five years.
The building area contemplated for Phase 1 ranges between 45,700 and 55,000 SF with a future
greenspace growth area for a Phase 2 building addition. Phase 2 addition areas are anticipated to be
between 20,860 and 16,500 SF. Grand total building area on either facility layout range between
66,560 to 71,560 SF.
The facility operates approximately 5 days a week and 18 hours a day. Normal business hours are 4:00
AM to 10:00PM with the bulk of the activity coming between 7:00AM and 6:30PM.
The exterior of the building will be smooth form faced loadbearing precast concrete panels having a
clear height between 18-20FT. Total exterior building height would be between 21-23Ft depending on
the final clear height selected. The office component would have 1 insulated glass set in painted
aluminum frames. Landscaping would complement the site as required in the city code.
The facility would also have an above ground diesel fuel tank and be located in the Southwest corner of
the land site.
Sutton looks forward to expanding into the Clearwater Business Park.
No.DescriptionDate
No.DescriptionDate
f:\\jobs\\9441 - 9460\\9443 - sutton transport - centerville\\cad c3d\\engineering\\9443_cover.dwg06/22/21Save Date:
JTRJTR
Centerville, Minnesota
SUTTON TRANSPORT
06/24/21
12
Weston, WI 54476-0378
8011 Schofield Avenue
of
SUTTON TRANSPORT, INC
Joseph T. Radach, P.E.
COVER
1
ISSUE DATE:
REVISIONS 1. DRAWN BY:DESIGNED BY:Signature:
Name:Date:06/24/21License #:45889
I hereby certify that this plan, specificationor report was prepared by me or under mydirect supervision and that I am a duly
Licensed Professional Engineer under thelaws of the State of Minnesota
R
Know what's
Centerville, Minnesota
SUTTON TRANSPORT
f:\\jobs\\9441 - 9460\\9443 - sutton transport - centerville\\cad c3d\\survey\\9443_excon.dwg06/22/21Save Date:
JAB
Centerville, Minnesota
2238
6/24/21
SUTTON TRANSPORT
12
Weston, WI 54476-0378
8011 Schofield Avenue
of
SUTTON TRANSPORT, INC.
Thomas R. Balluff
EXISTING CONDITIONS
2
I hereby certify that this survey, plan orreport was prepared by me or under mydirect supervision and that I am a dulyof the State of Minnesota.Name:Signature:Date: 6/24/21License #:40361
Licensed Land Surveyor under the laws
2.3.4.5.6.DRAWN BY:ISSUE DATE:FILE NO:
REVISIONS 1.
N
O
N
I
O
I
T
T
P
E
P
C
X
E
E
C
X
E
D
N
A
L
T
E
W
A
L
I
A
A
L
I
T
A
E
T
D
E
D
E
E
S
N
O
I
D
T
N
P
A
E
L
C
T
X
E
E
W
H
T
U
O
S
E
U
N
E
V
A
T
S
1
2
D
N
A
L
T
E
W
S
ERT
TE
AF
VRI
WEI
f:\\jobs\\9441 - 9460\\9443 - sutton transport - centerville\\cad c3d\\survey\\9443_prp.dwg06/22/21Save Date:
JAB
Centerville, Minnesota
2238
6/24/21
SUTTON TRANSPORT
12
Weston, WI 54476-0378
8011 Schofield Avenue
of
SUTTON TRANSPORT, INC.
Thomas R. Balluff
PRELIMINARY PLAT
3
I hereby certify that this survey, plan orreport was prepared by me or under mydirect supervision and that I am a dulyof the State of Minnesota.Name:Signature:Date:6/24/21License #:40361
Licensed Land Surveyor under the laws
2.3.4.5.6.DRAWN BY:ISSUE DATE:FILE NO:
REVISIONS 1.
N
O
N
I
O
I
T
T
P
E
P
C
X
E
E
C
X
E
D
N
A
L
T
E
W
A
L
I
A
T
E
D
A
L
I
A
T
E
D
E
E
S
N
O
I
T
H P
T
E
U
D
C
O
N
S
X
A
E
E
L
U
T
N
E
E
V
W
A
T
S
1
2
SUTTON TRANSPORT
IAF
EIVR
W W
LTE
DNA
RTS
TEE
f:\\jobs\\9441 - 9460\\9443 - sutton transport - centerville\\cad c3d\\engineering\\9443_remove.dwg06/18/21Save Date:
JTRJTR
Centerville, Minnesota
SUTTON TRANSPORT
06/24/21
12
Weston, WI 54476-0378
8011 Schofield Avenue
of
SUTTON TRANSPORT, INC
Joseph T. Radach, P.E.
REMOVALS PLAN
4
ISSUE DATE:
REVISIONS 1. DRAWN BY:DESIGNED BY:Signature:
Name:Date:06/24/21License #:45889
I hereby certify that this plan, specificationor report was prepared by me or under mydirect supervision and that I am a duly
Licensed Professional Engineer under thelaws of the State of Minnesota
R
Know what's
f:\\jobs\\9441 - 9460\\9443 - sutton transport - centerville\\cad c3d\\engineering\\9443_site.dwg06/21/21Save Date:
JTRJTR
Centerville, Minnesota
SUTTON TRANSPORT
06/24/21
12
Weston, WI 54476-0378
8011 Schofield Avenue
of
SUTTON TRANSPORT, INC
Joseph T. Radach, P.E.
SITE PLAN
5
ISSUE DATE:
REVISIONS 1. DRAWN BY:DESIGNED BY:Signature:
Name:Date:06/24/21License #:45889
I hereby certify that this plan, specificationor report was prepared by me or under mydirect supervision and that I am a duly
Licensed Professional Engineer under thelaws of the State of Minnesota
R
Know what's
f:\\jobs\\9441 - 9460\\9443 - sutton transport - centerville\\cad c3d\\engineering\\9443_utility.dwg06/18/21Save Date:
JTRJTR
Centerville, Minnesota
SUTTON TRANSPORT
06/24/21
12
Weston, WI 54476-0378
8011 Schofield Avenue
of
SUTTON TRANSPORT, INC
Joseph T. Radach, P.E.
UTILITY PLAN
6
ISSUE DATE:
REVISIONS 1. DRAWN BY:DESIGNED BY:Signature:
Name:Date:06/24/21License #:45889
I hereby certify that this plan, specificationor report was prepared by me or under mydirect supervision and that I am a duly
Licensed Professional Engineer under thelaws of the State of Minnesota
R
Know what's
f:\\jobs\\9441 - 9460\\9443 - sutton transport - centerville\\cad c3d\\engineering\\9443_grade.dwg06/18/21Save Date:
JTRJTR
Centerville, Minnesota
SUTTON TRANSPORT
06/24/21
12
Weston, WI 54476-0378
8011 Schofield Avenue
of
SUTTON TRANSPORT, INC
EROSION CONTROL PLAN
Joseph T. Radach, P.E.
GRADING, DRAINAGE, &
7
ISSUE DATE:
REVISIONS 1. DRAWN BY:DESIGNED BY:Signature:
Name:Date:06/24/21License #:45889
I hereby certify that this plan, specificationor report was prepared by me or under mydirect supervision and that I am a duly
Licensed Professional Engineer under thelaws of the State of Minnesota
R
Know what's
f:\\jobs\\9441 - 9460\\9443 - sutton transport - centerville\\cad c3d\\engineering\\9443_swppp.dwg06/18/21Save Date:
JTRJTR
Centerville, Minnesota
SUTTON TRANSPORT
06/24/21
12
Weston, WI 54476-0378
8011 Schofield Avenue
of
SUTTON TRANSPORT, INC
PREVENTION PLAN
Joseph T. Radach, P.E.
STORMWATER POLLUTION
8
ISSUE DATE:
REVISIONS 1. DRAWN BY:DESIGNED BY:Signature:
Name:Date:06/24/21License #:45889
I hereby certify that this plan, specificationor report was prepared by me or under mydirect supervision and that I am a duly
Licensed Professional Engineer under thelaws of the State of Minnesota
R
Know what's
f:\\jobs\\9441 - 9460\\9443 - sutton transport - centerville\\cad c3d\\engineering\\9443_details.dwg06/18/21Save Date:
JTRJTR
Centerville, Minnesota
SUTTON TRANSPORT
06/24/21
12
Weston, WI 54476-0378
8011 Schofield Avenue
of
SUTTON TRANSPORT, INC
Joseph T. Radach, P.E.
DETAILS
9
ISSUE DATE:
REVISIONS 1. DRAWN BY:DESIGNED BY:Signature:
Name:Date:06/24/21License #:45889
I hereby certify that this plan, specificationor report was prepared by me or under mydirect supervision and that I am a duly
Licensed Professional Engineer under thelaws of the State of Minnesota
VAN
PARKING
REQUIRED
VEHICLE I D
ACCESSIBLE
FOR VIOLATION
UP TO $200 FINE
f:\\jobs\\9441 - 9460\\9443 - sutton transport - centerville\\cad c3d\\engineering\\9443_details.dwg06/18/21Save Date:
JTRJTR
Centerville, Minnesota
SUTTON TRANSPORT
06/24/21
12
Weston, WI 54476-0378
8011 Schofield Avenue
of
SUTTON TRANSPORT, INC
Joseph T. Radach, P.E.
DETAILS
10
ISSUE DATE:
REVISIONS 1. DRAWN BY:DESIGNED BY:Signature:
Name:Date:06/24/21License #:45889
I hereby certify that this plan, specificationor report was prepared by me or under mydirect supervision and that I am a duly
Licensed Professional Engineer under thelaws of the State of Minnesota
f:\\jobs\\9441 - 9460\\9443 - sutton transport - centerville\\cad c3d\\engineering\\9443_details.dwg06/18/21Save Date:
JTRJTR
Centerville, Minnesota
SUTTON TRANSPORT
06/24/21
12
Weston, WI 54476-0378
8011 Schofield Avenue
of
SUTTON TRANSPORT, INC
Joseph T. Radach, P.E.
DETAILS
11
ISSUE DATE:
REVISIONS 1. DRAWN BY:DESIGNED BY:Signature:
Name:Date:06/24/21License #:45889
I hereby certify that this plan, specificationor report was prepared by me or under mydirect supervision and that I am a duly
Licensed Professional Engineer under thelaws of the State of Minnesota
f:\\jobs\\9441 - 9460\\9443 - sutton transport - centerville\\cad c3d\\engineering\\9443_details.dwg06/18/21Save Date:
JTRJTR
Centerville, Minnesota
SUTTON TRANSPORT
06/24/21
12
Weston, WI 54476-0378
8011 Schofield Avenue
of
SUTTON TRANSPORT, INC
Joseph T. Radach, P.E.
DETAILS
12
ISSUE DATE:
REVISIONS 1. DRAWN BY:DESIGNED BY:Signature:
Name:Date:06/24/21License #:45889
I hereby certify that this plan, specificationor report was prepared by me or under mydirect supervision and that I am a duly
Licensed Professional Engineer under thelaws of the State of Minnesota
f:\\jobs\\9441 - 9460\\9443 - sutton transport - centerville\\cad c3d\\landscape\\9443_landscape.dwg06/23/21Save Date:
RJRRJR
Centerville, Minnesota
Y
R
56346
SUTTON TRANSPORT
06/24/21
3
A
Weston, WI 54476-0378
N
I
8011 Schofield Avenue
M
of
I
SUTTON TRANSPORT, INC
L
Ryan J. Ruttger, RLA
LANDSCAPE PLAN
E
R
L1
P
ISSUE DATE:
REVISIONS 1. DRAWN BY:DESIGNED BY:Signature:
Name:Date:06/24/21License #:
or report was prepared by me or under mydirect supervision and that I am a duly
I hereby certify that this plan, specificationLicensed Landscape Architect under thelaws of the State of Minnesota.
R
Know what's
f:\\jobs\\9441 - 9460\\9443 - sutton transport - centerville\\cad c3d\\landscape\\9443_landscape.dwg06/23/21Save Date:
RJRRJR
Centerville, Minnesota
Y
R
56346
SUTTON TRANSPORT
06/24/21
3
A
Weston, WI 54476-0378
N
I
8011 Schofield Avenue
M
of
I
SUTTON TRANSPORT, INC
L
Ryan J. Ruttger, RLA
LANDSCAPE PLAN
E
R
L2
P
ISSUE DATE:
REVISIONS 1. DRAWN BY:DESIGNED BY:Signature:
Name:Date:06/24/21License #:
or report was prepared by me or under mydirect supervision and that I am a duly
I hereby certify that this plan, specificationLicensed Landscape Architect under thelaws of the State of Minnesota.
f:\\jobs\\9441 - 9460\\9443 - sutton transport - centerville\\cad c3d\\landscape\\9443_landscape.dwg06/23/21Save Date:
RJRRJR
Centerville, Minnesota
Y
R
56346
SUTTON TRANSPORT
06/24/21
3
A
Weston, WI 54476-0378
N
I
8011 Schofield Avenue
M
of
I
SUTTON TRANSPORT, INC
L
Ryan J. Ruttger, RLA
LANDSCAPE PLAN
E
R
L3
P
ISSUE DATE:
REVISIONS 1. DRAWN BY:DESIGNED BY:Signature:
Name:Date:06/24/21License #:
or report was prepared by me or under mydirect supervision and that I am a duly
I hereby certify that this plan, specificationLicensed Landscape Architect under thelaws of the State of Minnesota.
B&BB&BB&BB&BB&BB&B
2.5" Cal.B&B2.5" Cal.B&B2.5" Cal.B&B2.5" Cal.B&B6` Ht.6` Ht.8` Ht.#5 Cont.#5 Cont.#5 Cont.#5 Cont.#5 Cont.seedseed
Canadian HemlockAutumn Brilliance ServiceberryAutumn Magic Black Chokeberry#5 Cont.Alpine Currant#5 Cont.Goldflame Spirea#5 Cont.
River Birch Multi-Trunk10` Ht.Northern Acclaim Thornless Honey LocustBlack Hills SprucePrairifire Crabapple1.5" Cal.B&BDwarf Red Twig DogwoodDwarf Bush HoneysuckleMiss Kim LilacBailey`s
Compact American Cranberry Bush#5 Cont.1.5" Trap Rock Mulch4" DepthKentucky BluegrasssodMnDOT Seed Mix 25-151MnDOT Seed Mix 33-261
Acer x freemanii `Sienna`Sienna Glen Maple2.5" Cal.B&BClump Form, 2.5" Cal EquivalentGleditsia triacanthos inermis `Harve`Quercus bicolorSwamp White Oak2.5" Cal.B&BAmelanchier x grandiflora
`Autumn Brilliance`Clump Form, 2" Cal EquivalentCornus sericea `Alleman`s Compact`Spiraea x bumalda `Goldflame`Gold Foliage, Red FlowersSyringa patula `Miss Kim`Viburnum trilobum `Bailey
Compact`Juniperus chinensis `Sea Green`Sea Green Juniper#5 Cont.Calamagrostis x acutiflora `Karl Foerster`Feather Reed Grass#3 Cont.Turf Sod BluegrassType I - Turf Seed MixSeeding Rate
180 lb/acType II - Stormwater Seed Mix
Malus x `Prairifire`Red FlowersPhysocarpus opulifolius `Seward` TMSummer Wine Seward Ninebark#5 Cont.Red Fall ColorRock MulchNon-Woven Geotextile IncidentalRefer to notes for acceptable
seedingmethodsRefer to notes for acceptable seedingmethods. Seeding Rate 52.0 lb/ac
22Tsuga canadensis7310Aronia melanocarpa `Autumn Magic`67Ribes alpinum11216115,136 sf25,924 sf139,109 sf17,006 sf
WOAE4Ulmus americana `Princeton`American ElmWP9Pinus strobusWhite Pine6` Ht.APCVBCJSGYEW4Taxus x media `Tauntonii`Tauton YewARB3Thuja occidentalis `Holmstrup`Holmstrup ArborvitaeTITII
CODEQTYBOTANICAL NAMECOMMON NAMESIZECONTAINERRM5Acer rubrum `Northwood`Northwoods Red MapleFM6RB6Betula nigraHL4BL5Tilia americana `Boulevard`Boulevard LindenBF39Abies balsameaBalsam
Fir6` Ht.BH36Picea glauca densataCHSBCABCBRTD5DBH43Diervilla loniceraNBSSPGMKL18KFGROCKSOD
NJ?LR QAFCBSJC
TREESCONIFEROUS TREESCODEQTYBOTANICAL NAMECOMMON NAMESIZECONTAINERORNAMENTAL TREESCODEQTYBOTANICAL NAMECOMMON NAMESIZECONTAINERSHRUBSCODEQTYBOTANICAL NAMECOMMON NAMESIZECONTAINERGRASSESCODEQTYBOTANIC
AL NAMECOMMON NAMESIZECONTAINERGROUND COVERSCODEQTYBOTANICAL NAMECOMMON NAMESIZECONTAINER
EVERGREEN SHRUBSCODEQTYBOTANICAL NAMECOMMON NAMESIZECONTAINER
4 GLAFCQ KSJAF( QCC J?LBQA?NC LMRCQ DMP RWNC MD KSJAF )GD QFPS@ GQ @ & @, RFCLPCKMTC @SPJ?N & PMNCDPMK RMN 1/3 MD @?JJ@?AIDGJJ KGVSLBGQRSP@CB QS@QMGJ
12"
6"
2'(KGL.)
AMMPBGL?RCQR?IGLE RM GLQSPCSLGDMPKMPGCLR?RGML MD ESWJGLCQ ?LB QR?ICQ
ESW UGPC UGRF UC@@GLEDJ?EEGLE- MLC NCP UGPC4"-6" QFPCBBCB @?PIKSJAFCVGQRGLE EP?BCKGLGKSK 1/2 UGBRF MD PMMR @?JJNJ?LRGLE QMGJ KGVRSPC (QCC QNCA.)SLBGQRSP@CB MP QR?@GJGXCBQS@QMGJ
M.A. (QCC QR?IGLE BG?EP?K)
LMRC: ESW ?QQCK@JW MNRGML?J @SRAMLRP?ARMP ?QQSKCQ DSJJPCQNMLQG@GJGRW DMP K?GLR?GLGLE RPCCGL ? NJSK@ NMQGRGML DMP RFCBSP?RGML MD RFC ES?P?LRCC NCPGMB
ESW ?QQCK@JW- 16"NMJWNPMNWJCLC MP NMJWCRFWJCLC(40 KGJ) 1-1/2" UGBC QRP?N (RWN)BMS@JC QRP?LB 10 E?. UGPC, 2-7"PMJJCB QRCCJ NMQRQ (KfBMR 3401)> 180
BM
BM LMR ASR ? JC?BCP.
1. QA?PGDW @MRRMK ?LB QGBCQ MD FMJCNPGMP RM NJ?LRGLE2. RPGK MSR BC?B UMMB ?LB UC?I ?LB/MPBCDMPKCB RUGEQ. LMR N?GLR ASRQ.3. QCR NJ?LR ML SLBGQRSP@CB L?RGTC QMGJMP RFMPMSEFJW AMKN?ARCB
@?AIDGJJ QMGJ.GLQR?JJ NJ?LR QM RFC PMMR DJ?PC GQ ?R MPSN RM 2" ?@MTC RFC DGLGQFCB EP?BC.4. NJ?AC NJ?LR GL NJ?LRGLE FMJC UGRF@SPJ?N ?LB UGPC @?QICR, (GD SQCB), GLR?AR.@?AIDGJJ UGRFGL
?NNPMVGK?RCJW 12" MD RFCRMN MD PMMR@?JJ, U?RCP NJ?LR. PCKMTCRMN 1/3MD RFC @?QICR MP RFC RMN RUMFMPGXMLR?J PGLEQ, UFGAFCTCP GQ EPC?RCP.PCKMTC ?JJ @SPJ?N ?LB L?GJQ DPMK RMN1/3 MD RFC
@?JJ. PCKMTC ?JJ RUGLC.5. NJSK@ ?LB @?AIDGJJ UGRF@?AIDGJJ QMGJ.6. U?RCP RM QCRRJC NJ?LRQ ?LB DGJJTMGBQ.7. U?RCP UGRFGL RUM FMSPQ MDGLQR?JJ?RGML. U?RCPGLE KSQR @CQSDDGAGCLR RM RFMPMSEFJW
Q?RSP?RCPMMR @?JJ ?LB NJ?LRGLE FMJC.8. NJ?AC KSJAF UGRFGL 48 FMSPQ MDRFC QCAMLB U?RCPGLE SLJCQQ QMGJKMGQRSPC GQ CVACQQGTC.
NJ?L
3 PCOSGPCB ?R 120
8" 2-NJW LWJML QRP?NQBMS@JC QRP?LB 12 E?SEC UGPCN?GLRCB DJSMPCQACLR MP?LECUFGRC DJ?EEGLE (RWN.)RPCC UP?N4 GLAFCQ F?PBUMMB KSJAF4 GLAF BCCN Q?SACP8' QRCCJ RCC NMQR-@?AIDGJJ KGVSLBGQRSP@CB
QS@QMGJPCKMTC @SPJ?N & PMNCDPMK RMN 1/3 MD RFC @?JJ
12"
LMRC: QCC NJ?LRGLE LMRCQ DMP RFC RWNC MD KSJAF K?RCPG?J RM SQC.
733 Marquette Avenue, Suite 1000, Minneapolis, MN 55402
Planning Report
DATE: July 13, 2021
TO: Centerville Planning & Zoning Commission
FROM: Phil Carlson, AICP, Stantec
Conditional Use Permit, Site Plan Review
st
PID: 24-31-22-33-0017 (6800 block of 21 Avenue South)
OWNER: Rehbein Properties
INTRODUCTION
Sutton Transport is purchasing a 15-acre
parcel in the industrial park from Rehbein
Properties to build a trucking terminal. The
st
property has frontage on 21 Avenue South
on its east side (which is also the city limits
with Lino Lakes) and the existing cul-de-sac
of Fairview Street on the north side. The
project involves platting the parcel to
dedicate street right-of-way for both
st
Fairview Street and 21 Avenue. Fairview
will then be built to connect through
thst
between 20 and 21 Avenues, removing
the existing cul-de-sac and extending past
it.
The project also requires a Conditional Use
Permit for the truck terminal, which is a
conditional use in the I-1 Industrial District.
Site Plan review is also requested.
Surrounding uses are all industrial uses or
vacant industrial zoned land.
July 13, 2021
Centerville Planning & Zoning Commission
Page 2 of 6
PRELIMINARY PLAT
virtually identical to the original parcel. What the plat accomplishes is dedicating the necessary
street right-of-way to the centerline of abutting
st
and 40 ft to 21
complicated legal description with a simple plat name: Sutton Transport. Park dedication is not
required for new lots that are more than 5 acres in size, as is this parcel.
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT & SITE PLAN REVIEW
The issues addressed in the CUP will also Site Plan review issues.
Parking
There are three parts to the Sutton building: office, service bays, and warehouse. The code has
required parking numbers for office and warehouse uses, but not for service or a truck terminal.
Parking should be adequate. The site plan has a 93-car parking lot in front and parking opposite
the warehouse for 30 cabs and 30 trailers on either side. Cab/trailer parking is not usually part of
parking standards. The office, 5,000 sq ft, requires 5/1,000 sq ft, or 25 spaces, leaving 68 parking
spaces for the warehouse and service bays, plus the 60 spaces reserved for cabs and trailers. A
warehouse use per Centerville standards requires 2/1,000 sq ft. The 40,000 sq ft warehouse would
require 80 spaces. Calculating the 10,000 sq ft of service bays like the warehouse, it adds another
20 spaces, or 125 spaces required. Comparing the parking required and provided for these uses is
like apples to oranges, but nevertheless here is the summary of parking on site:
Required Parking
Office: 5/1000 x 5,000 sq ft = 25 spaces
Warehouse: 2/1000 x 40,000 sq ft = 80 spaces
Service Bays: 2/1000 x 10,000 sq ft = 20 spaces
Total Required = 125 spaces
Provided Parking
Parking Lot: = 93 spaces
Cab Parking = 30 spaces
Trailer Parking = 30 spaces
Total Provided = 153 spaces
The site plan envisions a future expansion of 16,560 sq ft of warehouse, which would require
another 34 parking spaces; 32 more spaces are shown as future cab and trailer parking. In
situations like this I rely on the experience of the business involved to know their parking needs,
which can be stipulated with conditions in the conditional Use permit.
July 13, 2021
Centerville Planning & Zoning Commission
Page 3 of 6
Landscaping
The proposed landscape plan has a mix of overstory, ornamentals, and shrubs, grasses and
ground covers. The Centerville code has the following landscape requirements:
Minimum 10% of lot in green space (plan meets this)
Minimum 3% landscaped area within the parking lot (plan meets this)
Minimum one tree per 3,000 sq ft of lot area (not met)
Minimum 1 shrub per 10 lineal feet of building and parking lot perimeter (not met)
Minimum 50-ft tree spacing at the boulevard (plan meets this)
green space and parking lot landscaped area but is short of the tree and shrub standards, and
the building/parking lineal feet standard. This shortage I believe is due to the very large lot and
building involved, almost 15 acres, compared to the 1 to 3 acre lots immediately adjacent to the
west. A ratio based on lot area will inevitably require many more trees around the site on a relative
basis than for a smaller lot. If the lot were half this size it would easily meet the tree standard. Also,
for a warehouse use with truck docks there cannot be foundation landscaping between the
building and the dock/parking area, like there is between the office building and its parking lot, so
the shrub lineal-foot standard cannot be easily met.
It may be more helpful to judge the landscape plan by considering the overall design and edges
The plan is generous, attractive, and well
designed and is more than adequate, in my opinion.
Lighting
A lighting plan was not submitted, but there are nine light poles noted on the site plan at the
outside edges of the parking areas. These lights must be downcast, cutoff type fixtures that do not
spoil light beyond the property line. There is no reference to lighting on the building itself, which
must also be downcast rather that wall packs or floodlights shining outward or upward.
Signage
A signage plan was not submitted, but there is reference to a monument sign. The Centerville Sign
to 200 sq ft, maximum 15 ft in height, and
setback at least 15 ft from any property line.
Wall signs are allowed, up to 10% of the wall surface area. A wall sign is shown above the office
entrance in the renderings, but a signage plan was not submitted. The sign above the office
entrance is much smaller than 10% of the façade.
July 13, 2021
Centerville Planning & Zoning Commission
Page 4 of 6
Building Materials
The Zoning Code building materials standards for the I-1 District includes the following:
brick, decorative block or approved textured masonry product. . . Buildings are required to
The building is proposed to be constructed of precast concrete panels in two tones of gray with a
contrasting red band (renderings below). The vertical line between panels will be visible on the
entire façade, breaking up the appearance. The design meets the intent of the code, in my
opinion.
July 13, 2021
Centerville Planning & Zoning Commission
Page 5 of 6
Outdoor Storage
The Industrial district code is ambiguous on the question of outdoor storage. Trucks and semi-
trailers used for the business are not considered outdoor storage unless the use is a conditional use
in the Industrial district, which this is. The location and scale of the parking for cabs and trailers on
the site plan is reasonable and appropriate for this use in the Industrial district, as well as being
reasonably screened with the proposed landscapin
warehouse is over 200 ft from Fairview Street and screened by several trees; the cab parking on
st
Avenue by clusters of balsam fir trees.
the east side is screened from 21
Trash Handling
Trash handling is presumed to be inside the building as no trash enclosure is shown on the site plan.
Hours of Operation
The application indicates the hours of operation will be 4:00 am to 10:00 pm, with most activity
between 7:00 am and 6:30 pm. These hours are typical for a truck terminal operation. The nearest
residential uses are over 500 ft to the south and over 700 ft to the west, with other industrial
buildings and uses in between. This kind of activity and hours for trucks loading and unloading is
typical for an industrial district and would not be likely to create noise levels that would violate
State standards.
RECOMMENDATIONS
Preliminary Plat
I recommend approval of the preliminary plat for Sutton Transport as submitted, with the
suggested findings below. The City Engineer has additional comments in a separate
memorandum.
1) The City has standards for the subdivision of land and dedication of right-of-way and
easements to ensure orderly development.
2) The proposed plat for Sutton Transport complies with City standards and is acceptable.
July 13, 2021
Centerville Planning & Zoning Commission
Page 6 of 6
Conditional Use Permit & Site Plan Review
I recommend approval of the conditional use permit and site plan for the Sutton Transport project
as submitted, with the following conditions and suggested findings:
Conditions of Approval
1) The applicant will confirm that the parking needs of the office, service bays, and
warehouse can be handled with the spaces provided on the site plan, including with the
future phase of development shown on the plans.
2) Landscaping on site will be maintained as proposed for the life of the project, replaced as
needed with the same material as proposed, or similar as approved by the City Engineer.
3) Lighting specifications will be provided to confirm that all fixtures are downcast, cutoff type
and will allow no more than 1 footcandle of light beyond the property line on all sides.
4) Signage plans will be submitted, to be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer,
showing that the monument sign meets size and setback requirements, and that wall
signage meets size requirements in the Centerville code.
5) Trash handling will be inside the building.
6) All requirements of the City Engineer will be followed.
1) The City has standards for parking, landscaping, lighting, building materials, and other
elements in the zoning code which are reasonable appropriate to encourage high quality
development in the City.
2) The proposed use by Sutton Transport provides for reasonable and adequate parking,
landscaping, building design, lighting, and screening of outdoor parking, and other issues.
3) The proposed plan meets the criteria for a conditional use permit and site plan.
DEADLINES FOR FINAL ACTION
The preliminary plat application was received on June 21. There is a separate 120-day deadline
for action on preliminary plats. Final deadline for action by the City Council is October 22, 2021.
The conditional use permit application was received on June 21, 2021. The 60-day deadline for
final action by the City Council is August 20, 2021.
CITY OF CENTERVILLEREQUEST
FOR ACTION
Agenda Item # Department: RequestedMeetingDate:
July 13, 2021
Planning and Zoning
IV.2
TITLE OF ISSUE:
Public Hearing - 1313 Mound Trail - Variance Request
BACKGROUND AND SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION:
An application for a variance has been submitted by the owner of 1313 Mound Trail to allow an accessory
structure in the "Front Yard". The applicant has provided a narrative, sketch and letters of support from
neighbors.
This application requires a Public Hearing.
COST AND SOURCE(S) OF FUNDING:
N/A
REQUESTED ACTION:
Open the Public Hearing; take public input and close the Public Hearing.
SUPPORTED DOCUMENTS ATTACHED
Motion By: ____________________________________
Resolution Ordinance Contract Minutes Plan Map
Second By: ____________________________________
X
Vote Record: Aye Nay
_____
_____
Project Narrative, Project Plans,
Other (specify) ____________
_____
_____
_____ _____
Staff Review Memo; Neighborhood Letters of Support
_______________________________________________________________
_____ _____
_____ ____________________________________________________________________
_____
_____
_____
_____
Refer to: _________________________________
Tabled Until: ______________________________
Consent
Other: ___________________________________
Regular
733 Marquette Avenue, Suite 1000, Minneapolis, MN 55402
Planning Report
DATE: July 13, 2021
TO: Centerville Planning & Zoning Commission
FROM: Phil Carlson, AICP, Stantec
REQUEST: Front Setback Variance
PID: 15-31-22-34-0023
ZONING: R-2
OWNER: Matthew and Michelle Beck
ADDRESS: 1313 Mound Trail
INTRODUCTION
the Becks own the single family home at 1313 Mound Trail, a
lakefront lot on Centerville Lake. They are building a new
home and want to build a new detached garage which
would be within the required front setback to Mound Trail,
which is 35 ft in the R-2 district. The survey submitted does not
indicate the dimension of the proposed garage to the lot
line, but it measures about 31 ft.
The Zoning Code in Sect. 156.107(A)(4) provides that
the area between the house and the street would be
setback, not the space around a house. The variance for the
proposed garage, therefore, is to the required 35 ft front
yard setback and not to its location in front of the house.
SURVEY
It should be noted that there is a difference between the lot survey submitted and the lot lines as
they appear on the Anoka County property website. We assume the survey is accurate; the
County website does not claim to be accurate for survey purposes. The graphic on the next page
shows the survey overlaid on the Anoka County website aerial, noting the difference in the angle
of the front (north) lot lines. Also noted is the measured 31-ft setback of the proposed garage.
July 13, 2021
Centerville Planning & Zoning Commission
Page 2 of 6
July 13, 2021
Centerville Planning & Zoning Commission
Page 3 of 6
PLANNING ISSUES
The application narrative notes that a garage
for storing equipment would not be appropriate
on the lake side, or rear yard, which is
reasonable. Therefore, placing the new garage
in the front toward Mound Trail is appropriate.
Two other factors on this lot should be
considered:
There are two rows of existing evergreen
trees, one north of the existing garage
and south of the proposed garage, and
the other at the north edge of the lot
along Mound Trail, illustrated to the right.
The location of other homes and
garages along Mound Trail.
The two rows of evergreen trees are significant
positive site features to be maintained. Placing
the new garage between the rows of trees is
reasonable, but it places the structure toward
Mound Trail into the required setback. Placing
the garage further south to move out of the
setback would encroach on the southern row of
trees.
The northern row of trees, along with a similar
row on the neighboring lot to the east, provides
screening to Mound Trail, as the trees do for the
is also forward on the
lot toward Mound Trail.
An option for locating a new garage that would not require a variance is in the location of the
existing garage, shown in red on the graphic. It is not clear why the applicants did not choose this
location.
Along Mound Trail on either side t three detached garages on the
front (Mound Trail) side of the lot. Three homes appear to be at the 35-ft front setback and
another two at about 40 ft, but none as close as the 31 ft proposed, at least based on
measurements from the County website. This segment of Mound Trail and the approximate
setbacks to Mound Trail are illustrated on the next page.
July 13, 2021
Centerville Planning & Zoning Commission
Page 4 of 6
Setbacks (approx.) along Mound Trail
VARIANCE CRITERIA
The criteria in the Zoning Code for considering variances follow closely the requirements in State
statute and are listed below. The key considerations in this case, I believe, are reasonable use,
unique circumstances and the character of the locality.
Reasonable Use
g vehicles and equipment on a single family lot.
Locating it away from the lake is also reasonable.
Unique Circumstances
There are unique circumstances on the property that pose challenges to meeting the required
setback. The rows of existing trees should be preserved and placing a typical sized garage
between them is reasonable, rather than removing some of the trees in order to meet the
setbacks. The optional location suggested above may not require removal of any trees.
Character of the Locality
homes and garages built close to the front. The proposed garage would be a few feet closer but
screened by the existing row of trees. The optional location would have less impact.
July 13, 2021
Centerville Planning & Zoning Commission
Page 5 of 6
Variance criteria in Sect. 156.310(A):
1) The variance is in harmony with the purposes and intent of the zoning chapter of this code;
2) The variance is consistent with the comprehensive plan; and
3) The proposal puts the property to use in a reasonable manner; and
4) There are unique circumstances to the property not created by the landowner; and
5) The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality;
OPTIONS
The Planning & Zoning Commission could:
1) Recommend approval of the variance as submitted, with conditions and findings of fact.
Motion: I move that the Planning & Zoning Commission recommend approval of the
variance \[as submitted or modified\], \[with conditions\], \[with findings of fact for approval\].
2) Recommend denial of the variance, with findings of fact.
Motion: I move that the Planning & Zoning Commission recommend denial of the
variance, \[with findings of fact for denial\].
3) Continue the item for more information or further discussion.
Motion: I move that the Planning & Zoning Commission continue the item to \[date\] in order
to gather more information.
RECOMMENDATION
I recommend approval of the variance to the front yard setback at 1313 Mound Trail as
submitted, with the condition that the existing trees along Mound Trail and to the west toward the
neighboring property be maintained or replaced with similar landscaping to be reviewed and
approved by the City Engineer.
Findings of Fact for Approval
1) The proposed use of the property for a garage on a single family lot is reasonable.
2) Placing the garage on the lake side of the lot would not be reasonable or in keeping with
the character or wishes of the residents of the lakeshore environment.
July 13, 2021
Centerville Planning & Zoning Commission
Page 6 of 6
3) There is a row of trees on the north side of the lot that are valuable features to be
preserved. Placing the garage at the required setback would remove some of those trees.
4) The proposed garage is to be placed approximately 31 feet from the front lot line
compared to the required 35-foot setback, a variance of approximately 4 feet.
5) There is a row of existing trees on the north lot line that will screen the proposed garage,
softening the impact of the encroachment into the setback.
6) Several existing homes and garages along Mound Trail are at 35- to 40-foot setbacks. The
character of Mound Trail is one with many structures close to the street.
7) The request meets the criteria for granting a variance in the Centerville Code.
If the Planning & Zoning Commission decides to recommend denial of the variance, possible
findings of fact for denial could include the following:
Findings of Fact for Denial
1) The proposed garage could meet the required 35-ft setback by moving it south a few feet,
potentially removing some of the existing trees in that area. This tradeoff is preferable to
encroaching in the setback.
2) There are other options to building a new garage that would not require a variance,
including in the area where the existing garage is, without removing any trees.
3) There is an existing garage on the property, which is already a reasonable use of the
property. A new garage is not a necessity.
4) Building the garage within the required setback would alter the essential character of the
locality by being closer to Mound Trail than an of the other homes or garages along this
street.
5) There are not unique circumstances on the property that pose challenges to meeting the
required setback.
6) The request does not meet the criteria for granting a variance in the Centerville Code.
DEADLINE FOR FINAL ACTION
The variance application was received on June 10, 2021. The deadline for final action by the City
Council is August 10, 2021.
From:Tyler Brigl
To:Mark Statz
Cc:MattBeck@FICO.com
Subject:Beck"s detached garage - Requesting cities Support for Our Plans for a Detached Garage
Date:Tuesday, June 29, 2021 5:54:18 PM
Attachments:image002.png
image003.png
image004.png
image005.png
image007.png
Caution: This email originated outside our organization; please use caution.
Hey Mark,
I hope you are well and first let me start out by always thanking you and the rest of the individuals who
support our city operations. Often thankless, but very appreciated job you all do.
Matt has inquired through out neighborhood regarding the opportunity to build a detached garage
between his new home and the street. My wife and I live at 1295 mound trail and as you may know have
a detached garage between our house and the street; very similar to the size the Beck family wishes to
build.
The city ordinance of not allowing structures in the “front” generally makes sense; however, I didn’t even
realize that the yard between my house and the street is considered my “front” yard until Matt explained
this concern with me. I always thought my front yard to be the area between my home and the lake. In
fact, as you likely know, the road on Mound Trail originally was between my house and the lake…
meaning my backyard was between my house and the road… Obviously the road has been moved, but
maybe something that can help approve the variance to the existing ordinance for Mound Trail. I guess
my first point is to ask the city to reconsider how our front and back yard is defined for Mound Trail as well
as consider the logic/intent of ordinance to fairly determine if a variance is justified – I truly believe it is.
Secondly – I ask that the fact that several of us home owners on Mound Trail already have detached
garaged in our yard between our home and street. It would look very odd to put this structure between
their new home and the lake. It would cosmetically only be aligned with existing homes on Mound Trail to
grant the variance to be build between the road and the home.
Lastly – Matt and Michelle are great people. This is the home and detached garage Michelle and Matt
have worked so hard for and have dreamed of for a long time. It is not about being treated differently
than any other home in Centerville – it is about what makes logical sense. I hope the decision to grant a
variance is made based on the fact that many of us on Mound Trail have detached garages between our
home and street, between the street and home is the logical spot for a garage vs between the lake and
home and mainly it logically is the right thing to do in my opinion.
I truly do not see a downside for the city to approve this variance and see it in the best interest of our
neighborhood and city.
Again and always – thank you for what you do and I hope the city is able to find a way to approve this variance for
Matt and Michelle.
All the best Mark.
Tyler Brigl | Sourcing Finance & Market Intelligence Manager
3M Sourcing
3M Center, Building 220 | St. Paul, MN 55144-1000 | United States
Mobile: +1 612 270 7507
ttbrigl@mmm.com
For general accounts payable inquires or invoice/payment status: 3MAPGSCUS@mmm.com
For eCommerce questions: STPeCommerceAmericas@mmm.com
For business process questions contact: US_splr_readiness@mmm.com
For Corecentric questions contact: 3mglobalsupport@corcentric.com
For Ariba questions contact: 1-800-974-4899
Mark Statz
From:Kimberly Stensgard <sten0048@umn.edu>
Sent:Thursday, July 1, 2021 3:05 PM
To:Mark Statz
Cc:Matt Beck
Subject:
/ğǒƷźƚƓʹThisemailoriginatedoutsideourorganization;pleaseusecaution.
HiMark,
Ihopeyouaredoingwell.sureyouarebusywithanumberofotherthings,butIwantedtoreachoutto
youinsupportofourfriendlynewneighbors.Ourunderstandingistheyarechallengedwithbeingableto
buildadetachedgarage(accessorystructure)intheoftheirnewhome.Itseemsthatthecode
wasperhapswrittenwithoutconsiderationofthelargelakepropertiesthatwouldbenefitfroma
Wepersonallywouldmuchprefertohavenicelybuiltstructuresthatcontain/storeitemsratherthan
junksittingallover(notthatMattandMichellewoulddothat).
Matt&MichelleBeckhavesharedtheirplanswithustoconstructadetachedgarageintheyardbetween
theirnewhomeandMoundTrail.Wehavereviewedtheproposedlocationanddesignofthedetached
garageandwefullysupporttheirplan.Theiroriginallysubmitteddetachedgaragedesignwhichmatchedthe
newhomeandincorporatesacoveredporchalongwiththegarageisentirelyacceptabletousaswell.
BestRegards,
KimGanzel
1
Mark Statz
From:Toni Peterson <tpeterson304@yahoo.com>
Sent:Thursday, July 8, 2021 10:21 AM
To:Mark Statz
Cc:Matt Beck
Subject:
Detached garage approval
/ğǒƷźƚƓʹThisemailoriginatedoutsideourorganization;pleaseusecaution.
MarkStatz,
WeareproudtowelcomeMattandMichelleBeckasourdirectneighborsonMoundTrail.Weallknow
thatlakelifeiswonderfulandmostfamilieswillacquiremanyitemsforthelake.Wefeelthatadequate,
withustheirplanstoconstructa
securestoragespaceisanecessity.MattandMichellehaveshared
detachedgarageintheyardbetweentheirbeautifulnewhomeandMoundTrail.MyhusbandandI
havereviewedtheproposedlocationanddesign.Weareinfullsupportoftheirplanoftheiroriginally
submitteddetachedgaragedesignwhichwillmatchthenewhouseandalsoincorporatesacovered
porchalongthegarage.Thisissomethingthatisabsolutelyacceptabletous.Welookforwardtothe
newbeautifulsightonMoundTrail!
Thankyou
ToniAbernathy
7635168115
SentfromYahooMailforiPhone
1
CITY OF CENTERVILLEREQUEST
FOR ACTION
Agenda Item # Department: RequestedMeetingDate:
July 13, 2021
Planning and Zoning
IV.3
TITLE OF ISSUE:
Public Hearing - Peterson Shores - Preliminary Plat
BACKGROUND AND SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION:
The City is in receipt of an application for a Preliminary Plat for Peterson Shores. The development is a plat of
one existing parcel, into two conforming parcels.
This application requires a Public Hearing.
COST AND SOURCE(S) OF FUNDING:
N/A
REQUESTED ACTION:
Open the Public Hearing; take public input and close the Public Hearing.
SUPPORTED DOCUMENTS ATTACHED
Motion By: ____________________________________
Resolution Ordinance Contract Minutes Plan Map
Second By: ____________________________________
X
Vote Record: Aye Nay
_____
_____
Project Plans,
Other (specify) ____________
_____
_____
_____ _____
Staff Review Memo;
_______________________________________________________________
_____ _____
_____ ____________________________________________________________________
_____
_____
_____
_____
Refer to: _________________________________
Tabled Until: ______________________________
Consent
Other: ___________________________________
Regular
Memorandum
Date: July 8, 2021
To: Planning and Zoning Commission
ity Administrator/Engineer
Item: Peterson Shores Preliminary Plat Review
The city is in receipt of a Preliminary
Peterson) for a proposed subdivision to be known as Peterson Shores. The proposal splits
the existing parcel at 7241 Main Street into two (2) conforming parcels within the
existing zoning district of R2 Low Density Residential. The proposed lots meet the
minimum setbacks, lot size, lot width and provide the required easements.
A few items for the applicant to address are:
The proposed plat seems to include property which is owned by the St. Paul
Regional Water Services. A plat may not include property which is not owned by
the applicant.
If the property along the lake is, indeed, not owned by the applicant, the revised
plat will need to again, meet minimum setbacks and lot size requirements.
The building pads of each lot may not encroach on the Sanitary Sewer easement
as shown on the plat (this is properly shown on the drawings; this comment is just
for emphasis).
A permit from Anoka County for the additional driveway will be required. The
new driveways shall not impact the regionaes or cross slope.
The city understands that the existing buildings will be demolished and no rights
to existing non-conformities will be retained.
The plat will be subject to Park Dedication Fees for the one additional lot created.
The plat will be subject to Sewer, Water and Stormwater connection fees as
Attachments: Preliminary Plat Drawings
cc: None
TOTAL SCORE:
CITY OF CENTERVILLE
PLANNING COMMISSIONER
ORAL INTERVIEW QUESTIONS
Applicant Name: _______________________ Interviewer Name:
The exam questions are intended to solicit information on the attributes identified as essential for the position. These attributes were
determined to be important for successful performance as Planning Commissioner.
Rating System:
1 = Poor 4 = Very Good
2 = Below Satisfactory 5 = Excellent
3 = Satisfactory
*Please add any additional comments after rating.
1. Please tell us what your qualifications are and why you want to become a member of the Planning
Commission.
Rating_____
2. The Planning Commission requires a commitment on the first Tuesday of each month plus potential
other workshops. Do you foresee any problems attending these meetings on a regular basis? Have you
ever attended a meeting? If so, when?
Rating______
3. The Planning Commission is often required to make recommendations on controversial applications.
Describe the steps you will go through, as a commissioner, to make decisions. Who will you listen to?
Where will you go for advice?
Rating______
4. How do you feel about your ability to provide objective recommendations on land use applications and
other ordinance issues?
Rating______
5. Please describe a time you worked as part of a team to reach a consensus. What was your role in
helping the team reach this consensus?
Rating______
6. Do you have any additional comments or questions for us?
CITY OF CENTERVILLEREQUEST
FOR ACTION
Agenda Item # Department: RequestedMeetingDate:
July 13, 2021
Planning and Zoning
V.2
TITLE OF ISSUE:
Block 7 Concept Plans - Centra Homes
BACKGROUND AND SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION:
Previously, the P&Z Commission reviewed several layouts for the Block 7 townhome proposal from Centra
Homes. The layout chosen required additional infrastructure, which financially impacted the project's
pro-forma (return on investment analysis). Centra Homes requested an additional $80k contribution from the
city to move forward with this layout. The city council directed Centra Homes and staff to go back to the
original layout, from the proposal. Attached is a layout similar to the original proposed layout, with the
addition of 2 homes (total of 26, now). The additional two homes will allow for some upgraded materials on
the street facing sides of the buildings (as seen in the attached elevation renderings).
COST AND SOURCE(S) OF FUNDING:
N/A
REQUESTED ACTION:
No official action from the Planning Commission is needed, but any input on the most recent proposal (layout
and architecture) would be welcomed.
SUPPORTED DOCUMENTS ATTACHED
Motion By: ____________________________________
Resolution Ordinance Contract Minutes Plan Map
Second By: ____________________________________
X
Vote Record: Aye Nay
_____
_____
Project Site Plan and Renderings
Other (specify) ____________
_____
_____
_____ _____
_______________________________________________________________
_____ _____
_____ ____________________________________________________________________
_____
_____
_____
_____
Refer to: _________________________________
Tabled Until: ______________________________
Consent
Other: ___________________________________
Regular
G87>HH8
G87>HH8
!/-01+
"#$
5953'9:'5;
"!,' *-./-01+2#345678"!,' )0..9*/-012#:/56781&1<92
$#=>?>=@AB5= $#>A?C5AB5=
#$,' )0..9*/-012;/5678#!=4@87AB5=
%&'(&)*+
"12!&3456738&96
'()*
!
"!,'*-./-01+2#"45678"!,')0..9*/-01+2345678#$,')0..9*/-01+2G456781&1<92"G45678%&F<%<F*+1<99+2<I%&-+1<99+21&1<92;"87>HH8
K"#
D*-1*%E099*%&<.
"G45678J$K
"! !"! !
"! !"! !#$ !
22!>?$
!
"!$ !<=
!
!
"
!"#$"!% &#% '(
+&%*9+1%**1
":
(*%01<F*+1%**1
"
"! !
:# :
":
#$ !"! !
"! !
G !
"$ !
"! !
.+/0"
!
!,
:G 3
@
"
1<
)*++,-
ÃÄ
À
ÁÀÂ
À
A
CITY OF CENTERVILLEREQUEST
FOR ACTION
Agenda Item # Department: RequestedMeetingDate:
July 13, 2021
Planning and Zoning
VII.1
TITLE OF ISSUE:
Rehbein Industrial (Sutton Transport) - Preliminary Plat, Conditional Use Permit & Site Plan Review
BACKGROUND AND SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION:
The city is in receipt of applications from Sutton Transportation for a Preliminary Plat, Conditional Use Permit
and Site Plan Review for a cross-dock/warehouse facility in the city's industrial-zoned area south of Fairview
and adjacent to 21st Avenue.
See attached staff memo for more information.
COST AND SOURCE(S) OF FUNDING:
N/A
REQUESTED ACTION:
Motion to recommend approval of the Preliminary Plat, Conditional Use Permit and Site Plan Review,
including the associated Findings of Fact, conditioned on the applicant addressing comments of the City
Planner, Engineer, Public Works Director and Public Safety Officials.
SUPPORTED DOCUMENTS ATTACHED
Motion By: ____________________________________
Resolution Ordinance Contract Minutes Plan Map
Second By: ____________________________________
X
Vote Record: Aye Nay
_____
_____
Project Narrative, Project Plans, Plat,
Other (specify) ____________
_____
_____
_____ _____
Staff Review Memo
_______________________________________________________________
_____ _____
_____ ____________________________________________________________________
_____
_____
_____
_____
Refer to: _________________________________
Tabled Until: ______________________________
Consent
Other: ___________________________________
Regular
CITY OF CENTERVILLEREQUEST
FOR ACTION
Agenda Item # Department: RequestedMeetingDate:
July 13, 2021
Planning and Zoning
VII.2
TITLE OF ISSUE:
1313 Mound Trail - Variance Request
BACKGROUND AND SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION:
An application for a variance has been submitted by the owner of 1313 Mound Trail to allow an accessory
structure in the "Front Yard". The applicant has provided a narrative, sketch and letters of support from
neighbors.
COST AND SOURCE(S) OF FUNDING:
N/A
REQUESTED ACTION:
Motion to recommend approval of the variance request as presented.
SUPPORTED DOCUMENTS ATTACHED
Motion By: ____________________________________
Resolution Ordinance Contract Minutes Plan Map
Second By: ____________________________________
X
Vote Record: Aye Nay
_____
_____
Project Narrative, Project Plans,
Other (specify) ____________
_____
_____
_____ _____
Staff Review Memo; Neighborhood Letters of Support
_______________________________________________________________
_____ _____
_____ ____________________________________________________________________
_____
_____
_____
_____
Refer to: _________________________________
Tabled Until: ______________________________
Consent
Other: ___________________________________
Regular
CITY OF CENTERVILLEREQUEST
FOR ACTION
Agenda Item # Department: RequestedMeetingDate:
July 13, 2021
Planning and Zoning
VII.3
TITLE OF ISSUE:
Peterson Shores - Preliminary Plat
BACKGROUND AND SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION:
The City is in receipt of an application for a Preliminary Plat for Peterson Shores. The development is a plat of
one existing parcel, into two conforming parcels.
See attached staff memo for more information
COST AND SOURCE(S) OF FUNDING:
N/A
REQUESTED ACTION:
Motion to recommend approval of the Preliminary Plat for Peterson Shores contingent upon addressing the
comments of the City Planner, Engineer, Public Works Director and Public Safety Officials.
SUPPORTED DOCUMENTS ATTACHED
Motion By: ____________________________________
Resolution Ordinance Contract Minutes Plan Map
Second By: ____________________________________
X
Vote Record: Aye Nay
_____
_____
Project Plans,
Other (specify) ____________
_____
_____
_____ _____
Staff Review Memo;
_______________________________________________________________
_____ _____
_____ ____________________________________________________________________
_____
_____
_____
_____
Refer to: _________________________________
Tabled Until: ______________________________
Consent
Other: ___________________________________
Regular