Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2022-05-25 CC Packet CITY OF CENTERVILLE CITY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA Wednesday, May 25, 2022 6:30 p.m. Meeting Live Streamed at: https://northmetrotv.com/centerville-stream/ COUNCIL MEETING (6:30 PM) I. CALL TO ORDER 1. Roll Call II. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE III. APPROVAL OF AGENDA IV. APPOINTMENTS/PRESENTATIONS 1. Mr. Matt Montain, Centennial Fire District (AED Grant) V. PUBLIC HEARING 1.None VI. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. April 27, 2022 City Council Work Session & Meeting Minutes VII. CONSENT AGENDA 1.City of Centerville Claims through May 25, 2022 (Check #35099-35117), (1887E- 1888E) & Voided Check #33309 2.Centennial Lake Police Department Claims through May 19, 2022 (Check #14319- 14332), (Payroll Checks #14326-14327) & (E2022034-2022038) 3.Centennial Fire District Claims through May 10, 2022 (Check #9302-9321) & (E2022006) 4.Encroachment Agreement – 7037 Eagle Trail – Driveway Pad in Encroachment 5.Church of St. Genevieve Requests a. Special Event Permit/Private Property – (Annual Festival) b. Temporary on Sale Liquor License c. Charitable Gambling License – (Raffle) 6. Granting of Pedestrian Trail Easement Along Main Street VIII. OLD BUSINESS 1.City Hall Campus and Thin Overlay Program Engineering Proposals IX. NEW BUSINESS 1.Resolution 22-0XX Approving Land Use Applications and Documents for the Fairview Second Addition Plat (Project Banjo) X. COUNCIL/ADMINISTRATOR ANNOUNCEMENTS 1.Administrator/Engineer Report 2.Council Reports a.Lakso Parks & Recreation Anoka County Fire Protection Council b.Koski Planning & Zoning Commission Fire Steering Committee c.King Economic Development Authority Fire Steering Committee d.Mosher Economic Development Authority Police Governing Board e.Love North Metro Telecommunications Commission Police Governing Board Other Mayoral Reports XI. ADJOURNMENT INFORMATIONAL MATERIAL Preliminary 2023 Municipal Wasterwater Charge (Met. Council) REMINDERS All meetings begin at 6:30 PM unless otherwise noted Planning and Zoning Commission – Tuesday, June 7, 2022 Fete des Lacs Committee – Wednesday, June 1, 2022 (5:00 PM) Parks and Recreation Committee – Wednesday, June 1, 2022 City Council – Wednesday, June 8, 2022 EDA – Wednesday, June 15, 2022 CITY OF CENTERVILLE WORK SESSION & CITY COUNCIL MEETING April 27, 2022 6:30 p.m. Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, the City of Centerville held their regularly scheduled City Council Work Session and City Council meeting on April 27, 2022 in Council Chambers of City Hall and the meeting was also live streamed by North Metro TV. COUNCIL WORK SESSION MEETING I. CALL TO ORDER Mayor Love called the meeting to order at 5:01 p.m. ROLL CALL Not Approved PRESENT: Mayor D. Love Council Member Steve King Council Member Russ Koski (Via Zoom) Council Member Michelle Lakso Council Member Darrin Mosher ABSENT: Jr. Council Member Danny Peterson (Non-Voting) STAFF: City Administrator Mark Statz Assistant City Administrator Athanasia Lewis Finance Director Bruce DeJong II. ITEMS OF DISCUSSION 1. 2022-2023 Draft Strategic Plan Administrator Statz reviewed the submitted Request for Council Action contained in Council’s packet. He stated that revisions had been completed following Council’s feedback from the last meeting. Additional discussion was had. 2. Energy Cost Budget Impacts Finance Director DeJong reviewed a Memorandum contained in Council’s packet regarding proposed energy bill increases (Xcel, CenterPoint and Connexus Energy) and how same would have implications on the 2022 and 2023 budgets. 3. Capital Projects Funding Discussion Items #1 and #2 were lengthy discussions and to allow for a five (5) minute break prior to the Regular Council meeting it was determine to discuss this item at the May 25, 2022 Council Work Session prior to their Regularly Scheduled Council Meeting. City of Centerville Council Meeting Minutes April 27, 2022 III. ADJOURNMENT Mayor Love recessed the City Council Work Session at 6:24 p.m. allowing for a five (5) minute break prior to starting the regular City Council Meeting. COUNCIL MEETING I. CALL TO ORDER Mayor D. Love called the meeting to order at 6:30 p.m. ROLL CALL PRESENT: Mayor D. Love Council Member Steve King Council Member Michelle Lakso Council Member Darrin Mosher Council Member Russ Koski ABSENT: Jr. Council Member Danny Peterson (Non-Voting) STAFF: City Administrator Mark Statz Assistant City Administrator Athanasia Lewis Finance Director Bruce DeJong II. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE III. APPROVAL OF AGENDA Mayor Love provided an opportunity for others to add or delete any items. Hearing none. Motion by Council Member Lakso, seconded by Council Member King to Approve the Agenda as Amended. All in favor. Motion carried. IV.APPOINTMENTS/PRESENTATIONS 1. None. V.PUBLIC HEARINGS 1.SWPPP/MS4 Page 2 of 7 City of Centerville Council Meeting Minutes April 27, 2022 Administrator Statz stated that he had noted that the City failed to complete this action last year and that the City was currently being audited this year. He stated that he would provide a review of the presented materials contained in Council’s packet and then Council would open the public hearing to receive public input. Discussion ensued regarding ponds being connected to an overflow which runs either to creeks/streams, curb, ditches, lake(s), etc., ponds, private ponds, funding, obtaining easements over private ponds, mapping, community planning/communication with residents regarding financial responsibilities associated with private ponds, adopt a drain program, public education, audit and consultants, possible financial savings due to the City Administrator also being an Engineer, healthy rain gardens, the City’s proactive actions regarding stormwater/water quality, definition of public versus private and maintenance responsibilities, more private ponds in the Industrial district, etc. Motion by Council Member Koski, seconded by Council Member King to opening the Public Hearing at 7:13 p.m. All in favor. Motion carried. Mayor Love provide an opportunity for public input. No public was present or provided input. Motion by Council Member Koski, seconded by Council Member Mosher to Close the Public Hearing at 7:15 p.m. All in favor. Motion carried. VI.APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES 1.April 13, 2022 City Council Work Session and Meeting Minutes Mayor Love provided an opportunity for others to add or delete any items. Mayor Love requested a typographical change on page 10, changing “that” to “thank” regarding the students in the audience. Motion by Council Member Mosher, seconded by Council Member Lakso to Approve the April 13, 2022 City Council Work Session & Meeting Minutes with the Requested Modification. Council Member King abstained. Motion carried. VII. CONSENT AGENDA 1.City of Centerville Claims through April 27, 2022 (Check #35025-35052) & (1869E- 1873E) 2.Centennial Lake Police Department Claims through April 21, 2022 (Check #14289- 14293), (Check #14296-14305), Payroll (Check #14289-14293) & (E2022028- E2022031) w/Voided E2022015 3.Centennial Fire District Claims through April 26, 2022 (Check #9295-9301) 4.Encroachment Agreement – 6871 Beaver Pond Way (Fence) 5.Charitable Gambling Permit – Centerville Lions Mayor Love provided an opportunity for others to add or delete any items. Page 3 of 7 City of Centerville Council Meeting Minutes April 27, 2022 Motion by Council Member Koski, seconded by Council Member King to Approve the Consent Agenda as presented. All in favor. Motion carried. VIII.OLD BUSINESS 1. American Rescue Plan Act Funding Elections Finance Director DeJong briefly reviewed the information contained in Council’s packet and stated that staff recommends the adoption of the Standard Allowance for ARPA Revenue Loss. Discussion ensued regarding non-use of funds for paying down debt or rainy day funds, additional reporting requirements identifying expenditures, utilizing some funding for parking lot improvements, processes being improved for grants/funding/etc. for all municipalities along with abuse of previous funding by certain entities. Motion by Council Member Lakso, seconded by Council Member Mosher to Adopt Res. #22- 011 – Elect the Standard Allowance for ARPA Revenue Loss as Presented. All in favor. Motion carried. 2. 2022 – 2023 City Strategic Plan Adoption Administrator Statz stated that staff was willing to incorporate the minor suggested modifications from the Work Session earlier or Council could table the item. Council Member Lakso had concerns for adoption in April rather than the beginning of the year. Administrator Statz stated that the process seems to start at the beginning of the year and he does not feel that the City is unique in this process and the plan could be there until a replacement is adopted. Motion by Council Member Lakso, seconded by Council Member King to Adopt the 2022- 2023 City Strategic Plan with IX.NEW BUSINESS 1. None. X.COUNCIL/ADMINISTRATOR ANNOUNCEMENTS 1. Administrator/Engineer Report Administrator Statz noted that the Administrator’s Report was included in the packet and highlighted that volunteers are still needed for the 5/8K runs event though a Race Coordinator has been contracted, a vacancy remains on the Parks & Recreation Committee, ballfield repairs are under way, Local Board of Appeal has been completed, the contract for the website redesign/CivicPlus would be coming shortly. He reported that the EDA is diligently working with Page 4 of 7 City of Centerville Council Meeting Minutes April 27, 2022 community partners, that Anoka County’s Economic Development staff individual has accepted another position. He reminded Council of the upcoming Senior Expo happening on May 19, 10- 2 at St. Gen’s Parish Community Center. He noted that Sutton transport has received their building permit, Rehbein dirt pile will be moving across the street (south of Dairy Queen). He stated that Kwik Trip has inquired about a permit with construction associated with the turn lane commencing shortly. He noted that NorBella Senior Living of Centerville was moving along nicely, that American Building Supply contractors were currently working on the interior of the building and awaiting for their RCWD permit, Max Storage anticipated a building permit following the completion of all of their documents. He reported that there was a Public Hearing scheduled for Project Banjo before the Planning & Zoning Commission on May 3, 2022 and then before Council at the May 25, 2022 meeting. He stated that their representatives has been very receptive and easy to work with. Mayor Love asked that Administrator Statz report on the current work the Assessors are completing regarding parcel inspections in the north and east of Main Street quadrant of the City. He stated that a visual inspection is required every five (5) years of properties. He stated that they would be badged and if concerns arise, please feel free to contact the Centennial Lakes Police Department. Assistant City Administrator Lewis – Assistant City Administrator Lewis had nothing to report. Finance Director DeJong – Finance Director DeJong stated that he had attended the Parks & Recreation Committee meeting, he stated that he felt that the Committee was very well-rounded, passionate and educated and that Council appointed great members and that he was very impressed. Attorney Glaser – Attorney Glaser gave no report due to his absence. Junior Council Member Peterson – Mr. Peterson gave no report due to his absence. 2.Council Reports a. Lakso – Parks & Recreation Committee – Council Member Lakso stated that the Parks & Recreation Committee held a Work Session where they discussed their strategic planning and a donation policy. She also stated that there was a vacancy on the Committee. Anoka County Fire Protection Council – No report was given. b. Koski – Council Member Koski asked if the City was going to provide additional information to the public regarding Project Banjo. Administrator Statz stated that it was decided not to enlarge the Legal Notice requirement mailing area of 350’ from the project but that Staff would be all social media avenues shortly but that the newsletter would not be timely for the hearing. Planning & Zoning Commission – Council Member Koski stated that the Public Hearing for Project Banjo would be held on May 3, 2022 at 6:30 p.m. Page 5 of 7 City of Centerville Council Meeting Minutes April 27, 2022 Fire Steering Committee – Council Member Koski stated the Committee increased the retirement benefit from $6,000/year per year of service to $7,500/year per year of service which would assist in recruitment, retention and being competitive. He reported that the budget was a 44% for salaries and there was hope that the line item would stabilize throughout the year. He also stated that the Committee discussed and adopted a vehicle take home policy and thanked Battalion Chief Matt Montain for his diligence in applying for grants. He reported that Chief Ratka is acting as Interim until the position can be filled. He stated that a retirement party would be held on Friday at the SBM Station #3 in Blaine for retiring Chief Smith. Administrator Statz stated that a MOU was signed for the EMT Training Program from the Centennial Fire District. He stated that both the Police Department and Fire District staff would receive training free of charge. Mayor Love had concern with the budget overage for salaries for the first quarter and was there a reason and was it anticipated that it would decrease. Administrator Statz stated that it was due to Duty Crews and in this case our own paid-on-call staff and plan is to have four (4) personnel and three (3) are from the Spring Lake Park, Blaine, Moundsview Department at 25% of the salary and what is over, are individuals filling the fourth position at 30- 35 hours a week with the shifts being filled. He stated that there has been difficulty filling these positions in the past, but that attitude has changed and the Committee will be looking at reducing that through the upcoming quarters. c. King – Economic Development Authority – Council Member King stated that discussion was had regarding slightly modifying the Business Loan/Grant Policy regardingfunding of signageand release of reimbursement, that they discussed a new tool called Opportunity Fund that would be discussed with Council, Holiday decorations for the downtown light poles and lighting for City Hall and the tree in front of City Hall, purchasing “Swag Bags” similar to last year, a request from the Parks & Recreation Committee was brought forward by Committee Member Akpan to partner in an event sponsored by the Centennial Community Education Department called “Trunk and Treat” 5K Halloween Run. Fire Steering Committee – Council Member King stated that Council Member Koski would provide the report for this item. d. Mosher – Economic Development Authority – Council Member Mosher stated that Main Street Market has interest and continues to expand. Mayor Love asked about the CenterStage Program. Assistant City Administrator Lewis stated that Ms. Michelle Koch, Main Street Marketers would be attending the next meeting to discuss the program and input from Page 6 of 7 City of Centerville Council Meeting Minutes April 27, 2022 businesses. She also reported that the paper would not be charging for space if it is not utilized for this program. Police Governing Board – No report was given. e. Love – North Metro Telecommunications Commission – No report was given. XI. ADJOURNMENT Motion by Council Member Lakso, seconded by Mayor Mosher to Adjourn the Regularly Scheduled Council Meeting at 8:04 p.m. All in favor. Motion carried. Respectfully submitted by Teresa Bender, City Clerk Page 7 of 7 05/19/22 2:23 PM CITY OF CENTERVILLE Page 1 Check Detail - May 25, 2022 Check DateCheck #Vender NameCommentsAmount 15/13/2022001887EMINNESOTA DEPT OF REVENUECOMMWATERSALESTAX - APRIL 2022$62.00 15/13/2022001887EMINNESOTA DEPT OF REVENUEWATERMETERSALESTAX - APRIL 2022$206.00 15/13/2022001887EMINNESOTA DEPT OF REVENUESOLID WASTE TAX - GARBAGE - APRIL 2022$1,398.00 Check Nbr 001887 MINNESOTA DEPT OF REVENUE$1,666.00 15/17/2022001888EPSNUTILITIESACHCHARGES - SERV THRU4-30-22$186.02 15/17/2022001888EPSNUTILITIESACHCHARGES - SERV THRU4-30-22$186.03 15/17/2022001888EPSNPERMIT&FEES ACHCHARGES - SERVTHRU4-30-22$205.77 15/17/2022001888EPSNMISC.ACHCHARGES - SERV THRU 4-30-22$23.50 Check Nbr 001888 PSN$601.32 15/25/2022035099 AFLACAFLAC INS - SERVTHRU MAY 2022$198.42 Check Nbr 035099 AFLAC$198.42 15/25/2022035100 AMERICAN ENVIRONMENTAL LLCHYDROJET/VACTOR (4) LIFT STATIONS$2,065.00 Check Nbr 035100 AMERICAN ENVIRONMENTAL LLC$2,065.00 15/25/2022035101 BBKG, LLCPROSECUTION-SERVTHRU 2ND 2021$11,989.81 15/25/2022035101 BBKG, LLCPROSECUTION-SERVTHRU 3RD QTR 2021$12,549.75 15/25/2022035101 BBKG, LLCPROSECUTION-SERVTHRU 4TH QTR 2021$11,621.00 15/25/2022035101 BBKG, LLC2050 MAIN -DEVEREAUX FAMILY - SERVTHRU4THQTR2021$218.50 15/25/2022035101 BBKG, LLC7064 CENTERVILLE RD- SERV THRU4THQTR2021$228.00 15/25/2022035101 BBKG, LLCALEX'S LANDSCAPING-SERV THRU 4THQTR 2021$85.50 15/25/2022035101 BBKG, LLCBANJO-SERVTHRU 4THQTR 2021$152.00 15/25/2022035101 BBKG, LLC$180.50 CENTRA HOMES-SERVTHRU 4TH QTR 2021 15/25/2022035101 BBKG, LLCGENERAL CIVILMATTERS - SERV THRU 4THQTR2021$5,603.50 15/25/2022035101 BBKG, LLCKELLYMATTER-SERV THRU 4TH QTR2021$28.50 15/25/2022035101 BBKG, LLCKWIK TRIP-SERVTHRU 4TH QTR 2021$152.00 15/25/2022035101 BBKG, LLCNORBELLA SENIOR LIVING - SERV THRU4THQTR2021$484.50 15/25/2022035101 BBKG, LLCREHBEIN COMMERCIAL - SERV THRU 4TH QTR2021$2,469.64 15/25/2022035101 BBKG, LLCREHBEIN INDUSTRIAL - SERV THRU 4TH QTR2021$2,356.00 15/25/2022035101 BBKG, LLCSHINGLECREEKCAPITAL - SERV THRU4THQTR 2021$1,710.00 Check Nbr 035101 BBKG, LLC$49,829.20 15/25/2022035102 BENDER, TERESAREPLACE CK#33309 FOR REIMBURSEMENT FOR MILEAGE$4.29 15/25/2022035102 BENDER, TERESAREPLACE CK#33309 FOR REIMBURSEMENT FOR MILEAGE$31.60 Check Nbr 035102 BENDER, TERESA$35.89 15/25/2022035103 CANON FINANCIAL SERVICES INC.P.W. COPIER- SERVTHRU5-31-22$33.13 15/25/2022035103 CANON FINANCIAL SERVICES INC.$33.13 REPLACEMENTCKFOR INV#21915627 - CK LOST(VOIDCK#3 Check Nbr 035103 CANON FINANCIAL SERVICES INC.$66.26 15/25/2022035104 CIVIC PLUSWEBSITE$26,700.00 Check Nbr 035104 CIVIC PLUS$26,700.00 15/25/2022035105 DELTA DENTALDENTAL INS - THRU JUNE30, 2022$367.32 Check Nbr 035105 DELTA DENTAL$367.32 15/25/2022035106 IMAGE PRINTING & GRAPHICSDISPLAY BOARDSFOR HISTORY NICHEIN COUNCILCHAMBE$292.00 15/25/2022035106 IMAGE PRINTING & GRAPHICSHEADER& PHOTOFOAMBOARD FORHISTORYNICHEIN COU$28.00 15/25/2022035106 IMAGE PRINTING & GRAPHICSCENTERVILLESUMMER$24.00 15/25/2022035106 IMAGE PRINTING & GRAPHICSCENTERVILLESUMMER$12.00 Check Nbr 035106 IMAGE PRINTING & GRAPHICS$356.00 15/25/2022035107 LEWIS, ATHANASIAOFFICE SUPPLIES -REIMBURSEMENT$23.57 15/25/2022035107 LEWIS, ATHANASIAMILEAGEREIMBURSEMENT FOR CONFERENCEINNISSWA$168.48 15/25/2022035107 LEWIS, ATHANASIAHOTELEXPENSE FOR MCMA CONFERNCEINNISSWA$268.62 Check Nbr 035107 LEWIS, ATHANASIA$460.67 15/25/2022035108 LINCOLN NATIONAL LIFE INSURANCLONGTERM DISABILITY INSURANCE - SERV THRU6-30-22$372.96 Check Nbr 035108 LINCOLN NATIONAL LIFE INSURANC$372.96 15/25/2022035109 MAMAAPRIL MAMAMEETING$25.00 Check Nbr 035109 MAMA$25.00 05/19/22 2:23 PM CITY OF CENTERVILLE Page 2 Check Detail - May 25, 2022 Check DateCheck #Vender NameCommentsAmount 15/25/2022035110 MARCO, INC.STANDARD PAYMENT - MAY 2022$202.42 Check Nbr 035110 MARCO, INC.$202.42 15/25/2022035111 MCMAM STATZ MEMBERSHIP DUES THRU 4-30-2023$150.00 Check Nbr 035111 MCMA$150.00 15/25/2022035112 MET. COUNCIL ENV. SERV. (SDS)WASTEWATER CHARGES - JUNE 2022$21,340.32 Check Nbr 035112 MET. COUNCIL ENV. SERV. (SDS)$21,340.32 15/25/2022035113 NATIONWIDE RETIREMENT SOLUTIONDEF. COMP. PAYPERIOD 11$1,125.00 Check Nbr 035113 NATIONWIDE RETIREMENT SOLUTION$1,125.00 15/25/2022035114 R.J.S PROPERTY MAINTENANCE$2,058.00 Check Nbr 035114 R.J.S PROPERTY MAINTENANCE$2,058.00 15/25/2022035115 SUN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANYSHORTTERMLIFEINS. - THRU 6-30-22$197.38 15/25/2022035115 SUN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANYLIFE INSURANCE - THRU 6-30-22$103.26 Check Nbr 035115 SUN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY$300.64 15/25/2022035116 VERIZONCELL PHONE - SERV THRU 5-9-22$59.32 15/25/2022035116 VERIZONCELL PHONE - SERV THRU 5-9-22$49.32 15/25/2022035116 VERIZONCELL PHONE - SERV THRU 5-9-22$49.32 15/25/2022035116 VERIZONCELL PHONE - SERV THRU 5-9-22$49.32 15/25/2022035116 VERIZONTABLET - SERV THRU 5-9-22$40.01 Check Nbr 035116 VERIZON$247.29 15/25/2022035117 XCEL ENERGY7098 CENTERVILLE RD- SERVTHRU5-4-22$21.60 15/25/2022035117 XCEL ENERGY7285 MAIN ST-SERVTHRU 5-4-22$64.47 15/25/2022035117 XCEL ENERGY1600LAMOTTE DR - BALLFIELD LIGHTS - SERV THRU 5-3-22$213.02 15/25/2022035117 XCEL ENERGY1889 CENTERST -SEWER LIFT - SERV THRU 5-8-22$43.57 15/25/2022035117 XCEL ENERGY7300 MILL RD- SEWERLIFT- SERV THRU 5-4-22$238.21 15/25/2022035117 XCEL ENERGY1600 LAMOTTEDR-WARMING HOUSE - SERVTHRU5-4-22$25.00 15/25/2022035117 XCEL ENERGY1875 FOXRUN-PUMP-SERVTHRU 5-3-22$196.52 15/25/2022035117 XCEL ENERGY$2,560.25 STREETLIGHTS -SERVTHRU5-7-22 15/25/2022035117 XCEL ENERGY6970 LAMOTTEDR-SERV THRU 5-3-22$370.92 15/25/2022035117 XCEL ENERGY1601 LAMOTTEDR-SERV THRU 5-4-22$26.71 15/25/2022035117 XCEL ENERGY1880 MAIN ST-SERVTHRU 5-7-22$1,317.99 15/25/2022035117 XCEL ENERGY1880 MAIN ST-CITY HALL/FIRE STATION-SERVTHRU 5-7-2$735.59 Check Nbr 035117 XCEL ENERGY$5,813.85 $113,981.56 CENTENNIAL LAKES POLICE DEPTCheck Register - POLICEPage: 1 Check Issue Dates: 5/6/2022 - 5/12/2022May 13, 2022 12:25PM Report Criteria: Report type: Summary Check NumberCheck Issue DatePayeeAmount 1431905/12/2022DEPUTY REGISTRAR #15070.00 1432005/12/2022GEORGE'S INC245.00 1432105/12/2022KNOWLAN'S SUPER MARKETS8.75 1432205/12/2022METRO SALES, INC176.39 1432305/12/2022QUILL LLC249.42 1432405/12/2022CITY OF ROSEVILLE5,828.93 1432505/12/2022SIGNS NOW1,241.64 202203405/12/2022CENTURY LINK123.30 202203505/12/2022DEARBORN NATIONAL1,697.13 202203605/12/2022HEALTH PARTNERS11,722.27 202203705/12/2022WEX BANK4,718.95 Grand Totals: 26,081.78 M = Manual Check, V = Void Check CENTENNIAL FIRE DISTRICTCheck Register - FIREPage: 1 Check Issue Dates: 4/27/2022 - 5/10/2022May 10, 2022 01:01PM Report Criteria: Report type: Summary Check NumberInput DateCheck Issue DatePayeeAmount 930205/10/202205/10/2022ANCOM COMMUNICATIONS, INC926.09 930304/29/202204/29/2022LEAGUE OF MN CITIES INS TRUST37,524.00 930405/10/202205/10/2022ANOKA COUNTY TREASURY DEPT.112.50 930505/10/202205/10/2022Gilbert Mechanical Contractors, LLC325.00 930605/10/202205/10/2022LEAGUE OF MN CITIES INS TRUST5,402.00 930705/10/202205/10/2022PINNACLE ROOFING SYSTEMS1,121.50 930805/10/202205/10/2022CITY OF ROSEVILLE1,462.23 930905/10/202205/10/2022SASCS, LLC300.00 931005/10/202205/10/2022SPRING LAKE PARK FIRE DEPT,INC1,352.26 931105/10/202205/10/2022VERIZON WIRELESS130.84 931205/10/202205/10/2022WEX BANK1,045.20 202200605/10/202205/10/2022US BANK1,122.77 Grand Totals: 50,824.39 M = Manual Check, V = Void Check CITY OF CENTERVILLE REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION Agenda Item # Department: Requested Council Meeting Date: May 25, 2022 Engineering/Public Works VIII.1 TITLE OF ISSUE: City Hall Campus and Thin Overlay Program Engineering Proposals BACKGROUND AND SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION: Council has discussed various capital projects. There was general consensus on parking lot improvements, including lighting. Campus landscaping improvements were also discussed, but a scope of that work needs to be explored. The attached proposals move the parking lot and lighting work forward, and produce some landscaping concept sketches with associated budgets for further consideration. Additionally, staff is recommending an Overlay project for 2022. Attached are scope and fee proposals from the City's engineering consultant (with tasks and hourly breakdowns, as directed) for design work related to, : - City Hall Parking Lot Resurfacing and Thin Overlay Project for 2022 - Parking Lot Lighting Improvements - City Hall/Fire Station Landscaping Improvements COST AND SOURCE(S) OF FUNDING: $37,300 - Street Capital Fund; $6,100 General Fund; $5,000 General Fund REQUESTED COUNCIL ACTION: Motion to approve the attached proposals for design work associated with City Hall Campus Improvements and the Thin Overlay program. For Clerk’s Use: SUPPORTED DOCUMENTS ATTACHED Motion By: ____________________________________ Resolution Ordinance Contract Minutes Plan Map Second By: ____________________________________ Vote Record: Aye Nay _____ _____ Engineering Proposals Other (specify) ____________ _____ _____ _____ _____ _______________________________________________________________ _____ _____Ki _____ ____________________________________________________________________ Administration Department Use: Refer to: _________________________________ Consent Tabled Until: ______________________________ Regular Other: ___________________________________ PROJECT WORKPLAN (KEY TASKS/STAFF/BUDGET) Centerville City Hall - Landscape Development QC/Senior Landscape TOTAL Role/Responsibility:ArchitectLandscape Architect Todd WichmanMark Flicker Name: Hourly Rate:$187$153 Task Name Phase 1: City Hall Landscape Development - Schematic Design Task 1.1 - Project Intro/Define Goals Project Review/Goals/Site Layout2.52.5 Subtotal Hours- Task 1.12.52.5 Subtotal - Task 1.1$383$383 Task 1.2 - Design Development (Schematic) Layout 'A'0.588.5 Layout 'B'0.588.5 0.522.5 Opinion of Probable Cost (2 Layouts) 112.0 Owner Review Subtotal Hours - Task 1.22.51921.5 Subtotal - Task 1.2$468$2,907$3,375 Task 1.3 - Final Production Preferred Concept0.57.58.0 Subtotal Hours - Task 1.30.57.58.0 Subtotal - Task 1.3$94$1,148$1,241 Subtotal Fee (Phase 1)$4,998 Expenses (mileage and printing)$0 Total Project Hours32 Total Design Services Fee (including expenses)$4,998 PROJECT WORKPLAN (KEY TASKS/STAFF/BUDGET) Centerville City Hall - Parking Lot Lighting Electrical Engineer in TOTAL Electrical Engineer Role/Responsibility:QCTraining Chuck OehrleinMike FitzpatrickAnkita Bollu Name: Hourly Rate:$187$187$166 Task Name Phase 1: Design Services for Parking Lot Lighting Task 1.1 - Design and Meetings Site visit (1) and design meeting with City33 Internal design team meetings112 Lighting design134 Subtotal Hours- Task 1.1549 Subtotal - Task 1.1$935$664$1,599 Task 1.2 - Plans and Specifications Site Plan4812 Electrical Details123 235 Specifications 112 QA/QC Subtotal Hours - Task 1.2391022 Subtotal - Task 1.2$561$1,683$1,660$3,904 Task 1.3 - Bidding/Quoting Assistance Contractor Questions/Addenda (as needed)2.52.5 Assist with quote evaluation0.50.5 Subtotal Hours - Task 1.333 Subtotal - Task 1.3$561$561 Subtotal Fee (Phase 1)$6,064 Expenses (mileage and printing)$40 Total Project Hours34.00 Total Design Services Fee (including expenses)$6,104 PROJECT WORKPLAN (KEY TASKS/STAFF/BUDGET) Centerville 2022 Thin Overlay/Parking Lot Improvements Project Principal inProjectEngineer inSurveyConstructionWetlandWetlandWetland TOTAL Role/Responsibility:Charge/QCManagerTrainingCrewAdminManager/QCSpecialistDelineatorSpecialist KellieBrandon1-PersonShirley Lee MannSchlegelJohnsonCrewLovellCraig LarsonJohn SmythBL 8BL 9 Name: Hourly Rate:$204$181$136$162$132$165$181$136$147 Task Name Phase 1: Feasibility Study/Survey: Task 1.1 - Preliminary Survey GSOC Coordination/Prelim Survey28111 Subtotal Hours- Task 1.128111 Subtotal - Task 1.1$272$1,296$132$1,700 Task 1.2 - Feasibility Study Project Management22 Meetings with City Staff/Site Visit (1)2226 920534 Feasibility Report/Figures/Cost Estimate/Printing 11 Assessment Roll Coord. (Provided by City) 224 City review coord/address comments 22 QA/QC Subtotal Hours - Task 1.2216245249 Subtotal - Task 1.2$408$2,896$3,264$660$330$7,558 Task 1.3 - Council Meeting to Present Report Attend Council Meeting to present report (1)33 Subtotal Hours - Task 1.333 Subtotal - Task 1.3$543$543 SubTotal Hours - Phase 1 2192686200063 $408$3,439$3,536$1,296$792$330$0$0$0$9,801 Sub Total Cost - Phase 1 Phase 2: Design and Bidding: Task 2.1: Design Project Management44 Meetings with City Staff (1)2226 Base Map Creation/Updates/60% Plans42226 Parking Lot Design (SW Corner)4812 County Coordination224 Subtotal Hours - Task 2.11634252 Subtotal - Task 2.1$2,896$4,624$330$7,850 Task 2.2 - Council Meeting 33 Attend Council Meeting to present plans (1) Subtotal Hours - Task 2.233 Subtotal - Task 2.2$543$543 Task 2.3 - Bidding Documents 1026844 Specifications/Bid Form 268 100% Plans Advertisement for Bids1113 448 QA/QC Subtotal Hours - Task 2.3413339463 Subtotal - Task 2.3$816$2,353$4,488$1,188$660$9,505 Task 2.4 - Permitting (Wetland Impacts) 55 Wetland Delineation 212620 Wetland Delineation Report/Figures 44 TEP Meeting Rice Creek Watershed District/USACOE Permit and 133218 Figures Subtotal Hours - Task 2.41524847 Subtotal - Task 2.4$2,715$3,264$1,176$7,155 Task 2.5 - Bidding Contractor Questions/Addenda1427 Bid Opening0.5112.5 Subtotal Hours - Task 2.51.5539.5 Subtotal - Task 2.5$272$680$396$1,348 Task 2.6 - Bid Tabulation Bid Tab/Bid Results Letter0.5112.5 Subtotal Hours - Task 2.60.5112.5 Subtotal - Task 2.6$91$136$132$359 Task 2.7 - Council Meeting Attend Council Meeting to discuss bids/award (1)33 Subtotal Hours - Task 2.733 Subtotal - Task 2.7$543$543 Sub Total Hours - Phase 2 43773013615248180 Sub Total Cost - Phase 2$816$6,697$9,928$0$1,716$990$2,715$3,264$1,176$27,302 Total Design Cost (Phase 1 and Phase 2)$37,103 Expenses (mileage and printing)$600 Total Project Hours243 Total Engineering Fee (including expenses)$37,703 CITY OF CENTERVILLE REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION Agenda Item # Department: Requested Council Meeting Date: May 25, 2022 Engineering/Public Works IX.1 TITLE OF ISSUE: Resolution 22-0XX Approving Land Use Applications & Documents for Fairview Second Addition (Proj. Banjo BACKGROUND AND SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION: See attached resolution and information. COST AND SOURCE(S) OF FUNDING: See attached summary of fees and estimate of future taxes. REQUESTED COUNCIL ACTION: Motion to Resolution 22-0XX Approving Land Use Applications and Documents for Fairview 2nd Addition (Project Banjo) For Clerk’s Use: SUPPORTED DOCUMENTS ATTACHED Motion By: ____________________________________ Resolution Ordinance Contract Minutes Plan Map Second By: ____________________________________ X XXX Vote Record: Aye Nay _____ _____ Staff Memo, Traffic Study, Noise Study Other (specify) ____________ _____ _____ _____ _____ _______________________________________________________________ _____ _____Ki _____ ____________________________________________________________________ Administration Department Use: Refer to: _________________________________ Consent Tabled Until: ______________________________ Regular Other: ___________________________________ CITY OF CENTERVILLE COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION #22-____ A RESOLUTION APPROVING LAND USE DOCUMENTS FOR THE FAIRVIEW SECOND ADDITION PLAT WHEREAS, the City of Centerville Planning and Zoning Commission reviewed and recommended approval of a number of land use applications for the development of the Fairview Second Addition Plat. The Commission recommends the Council approve: Preliminary Plat for Fairview Second Addition. Site Plan. Planned Unit Development and Conditional Use Permit for a Planned Unit Development for the Fairview Second Addition Plat. WHEREAS, the City of Centerville City Council, after review and consideration of these land use applications and documents for the development of the Fairview Second Addition Plat finds that it is in the best interest of the City to approve: Preliminary Plat for Fairview Second Addition. Final Plat for Fairview Second Addition. Site Plan. Ordinance 22-##, Planned Unit Development and Conditional Use Permit for a Planned Unit Development for the Fairview Second Addition Plat. Development & Subdivision Agreement for Fairview Second Addition. WHEREAS, given time pressure and the need to begin construction while favorable conditions exist for the supply of construction materials, the City Council waives a second reading of Ordinance 22-##. WHEREAS, the City Council authorizes the City Attorney to make amendments to these land use documents as necessary such that they do not change or alter the intent of the documents. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Centerville City Council does hereby, approve the aforementioned land use applications and documents. th PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED this 25 day of May 2022 by the City Council of the City of Centerville. ________________________________ D. Love, Mayor Attest: ____________________________________ Teresa Bender, City Clerk CITY OF CENTERVILLE COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA ORDINANCE #22-xx AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF CENTERVILLE, MINNESOTA, APPROVING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT FOR THE FAIRVIEW SECOND ADDITION PLAT WHEREAS, RYAN COMPANIES, (“Applicant”), with permission of the fee owners, and on behalf of, and as agent for BANJO \[NAME TO BE REVISED\],who is in contract to purchase these “Subject Parcels”, which are legally described in Exhibit A, attached. WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission held a series of meetings and hearings regarding the governance of the Plat, FAIRVIEW SECOND ADDITION. WHEREAS, at its meeting on April 5, 2022, the Planning and Zoning Commission determined that Plat development would proceed as a Planned Unit Development pursuant to Centerville Code of Ordinances, Section 156.222. WHEREAS, at a public hearing on May 3, 2022, the Planning and Zoning Commission made FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS with respect to the application for a Planned Unit Development, and for preliminary and final Plat. WHEREAS, the Applicant obtained the RECOMMENDATION of the Planning and Zoning Commission to GRANT variances pursuant to a Planned Unit Development and impose conditions in the form of a Conditional Use Permit governing the development of the parcel and the construction of improvements thereon. Those findings and recommendations are set forth in the memorandum from Phil Carlson, AICP, Stantec, dated May 25, 2022. This memorandum is attached as Exhibit B. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Centerville, Minnesota, that it adopts the aforementioned findings of fact related to the requested land use applications for the Subject Parcels, and DOES ORDAIN the adoption of each recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission approving a Conditional Use Permit for a Planned Unit Development for the Plat “FAIRVIEW SECOND ADDITION” to include the variances and conditions set forth in Exhibit C. Effective Date. This ordinance shall be effective immediately upon its passage and publication. th PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED this 25 day of May 2022 by the City Council of the City of Centerville. ________________________________ D. Love, Mayor Attest: ____________________________________ Mark Statz, City Administrator EXHIBIT A Legal Description of Subject Parcels The Subject Parcels are legally described as: Parcel 1: The South 662.45 feet of the Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 24, Township 31, Range 22, Anoka County, Minnesota, as measured at a right angle to the South line of said Northwest Quarter. Abstract Property Parcel 2: The Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 24, Township 31, Range 22, Anoka County, Minnesota, which lies northerly of the South 662.45 feet of said Northwest Quarter as measured at a right angle to the South line of said Northwest Quarter. Abstract Property Parcel 3: That part of the South Half of the North Half of the Southeast Quarter Section 23, Township 31, Range 22, lying easterly of the centerline of County Road No. 54, Anoka County, Minnesota. Torrens Property (Certificate of Title No. 94125) All parcels are subject to easements of record. EXHIBIT B Findings of Fact - Stantec Memorandum \[REMAINDER OF PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK\] EXHIBIT C Planned Unit Development and Conditional Use Permit \[REMAINDER OF PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK\] _____________________________________________________________________________________ CITY OF CENTERVILLE ANOKA COUNTY, MINNESOTA APPROVAL OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT _____________________________________________________________________________________ Subject to the terms and conditions set forth herein, the City of Centerville hereby grants approval of a CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT for the SUBJECT PROPERTY on behalf of the LANDOWNER. This Permit is granted as part of a planned unit development as approved by the City Council. The “Permit” allows the Landowner to: Develop, construct, and operate a Loading facility, Truck Terminal, and a facility for Outside Storage on the Subject Property. To construct a building of 44 feet in height on the Subject Property. This variance for building height is limited to the structure approved by the Commission at the time this Permit was granted. All, being subject to the conditions stated herein. This Permit governs the “Subject Property” legally described as: FAIRVIEW SECOND ADDITION Plat, located in the City of Centerville, County of Anoka, and the State of Minnesota. Prior to adoption of the Plat, the land was formerly described: Parcel 1: The South 662.45 feet of the Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 24, Township 31, Range 22, Anoka County, Minnesota, as measured at a right angle to the South line of said Northwest Quarter. Abstract Property Parcel 2: The Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 24, Township 31, Range 22, Anoka County, Minnesota, which lies northerly of the South 662.45 feet of said Northwest Quarter as measured at a right angle to the South line of said Northwest Quarter. Abstract Property Parcel 3: That part of the South Half of the North Half of the Southeast Quarter Section 23, Township 31, Range 22, lying easterly of the centerline of County Road No. 54, Anoka County, Minnesota. Torrens Property (Certificate of Title No. 94125) This Permit is granted to the “Landowner.” At the time of this application the Landowner is: BANJO – NAME TO BE INSERTED The Parties agree that this Permit shall operate and enjoin the City, the Subject Property, and the Landowner to the terms and conditions stated herein. The Ordinances of the City of Centerville and the State of Minnesota govern the Subject Property and the Landowner. The Landowner is responsible to enforce the conditions of this Permit upon any owner of the land or shareholder thereof, any person or entity entering upon the Subject Property, or any employee, partner, contractor, heir, or assignee of the Landowner. FINDINGS OF FACT FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT The Planning and Zoning Commission and the City Council made these Findings of Fact in support of the recommendation and approval of this Conditional Use Permit: 11)The proposed facility is a large, complex project which as submitted requires a conditional Use Permit for height of building over 35 feet, and does not meet the zoning standards for location of outside storage and location of loading facilities. It is therefore appropriate and reasonable to process the request as a planned unit development (PUD) which allows numerous site and building issues to be negotiated under one approval and development agreement. 12)The applicants have supplied information on traffic conditions at the proposed facility and have prepared a traffic study which identifies certain issues associated with the development. It is reasonable and appropriate to address these issues within the PUD process and to require the applicant to adhere to certain conditions and to pay for improvements identified in the traffic study that are necessary to mitigate these issues. 13)The project will have several hundred employees on site who will reasonably have a desire to walk or bike in the vicinity. Providing for a future trail adjacent to the project on Fairview Street or having the project contribute to the cost of this improvement is a reasonable and appropriate condition of approval. 14)The future trail identified above should reasonably connect to other trails in th Centerville on the west side of 20 Avenue, to expand the network of trails in the th vicinity. Being a busy county road, a safe crossing of 20 Avenue for pedestrians and bicyclists for this trail connection is needed. Therefore, it is reasonable and th appropriate to have the City and County cooperate on a study of the 20 Avenue intersections with Fairview Street and Center Street to arrive at a safe crossing facility, which would connect to the future trail on Fairview Street in front of the proposed project. 15)The City has standards in the Zoning Code for landscaping and the provision of trees and shrubs on site. The proposed landscape plan does not meet the required number of trees for this site, therefore it is reasonable to have the applicant pay the difference so that the City can use these funds to provide similar improvements elsewhere. 16)The proposed truck loading docks on the west side of the proposed building are th within about 500 feet of single family homes on the west side of 20 Avenue, on Center Street, Eagle Trail, and Cottonwood Court. The van loading area also opens to the west toward this residential area. The project will have truck deliveries in the nighttime hours between 10 pm and 7 am, and the van loading area will have several hundred vans moving through the area with their noise and activity during daytime hours. The nearby homes may be adversely affected by the noise of these trucks and loading activity and therefore some kind of noise mitigation is appropriate. Follow-up to the noise mitigation will need to be done within a reasonable period of time to determine if the noise modeling was accurate. 17)The several hundred vehicles on site will add exhaust and fumes if they idle for long periods of time, adding to air pollution. Reducing idling time is therefore desirable and reasonable. 18)The 44-ft height of the building, above the City’s 35-ft limit, requiring a conditional use permit, is acceptable given the significant setbacks of the building from all exterior edges of the property, the screening achieved by landscaping around all sides of the site, and the general character and use of the property. 19)The outside storage of semi-trailers in the truck loading area, requiring a conditional use permit, on the west side of the building is acceptable given that the number of trailers is limited and all goods and materials will be enclosed in the trailers. 20)The City has engineering standards for provision of utilities and construction standards which are reasonable for the health, safety and welfare of the people in Centerville. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT CONDITIONS The City of Centerville hereby grants the Subject Property and Landowner a CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT to develop, construct, maintain, and operate a truck terminal and a facility for outside storage, subject to the following conditions: 1)Limit delivery vehicle trips in/out of facility during AM/PM peak traffic (7 – 9 AM; 4 – 6 PM), to 180 or less combined total vehicles in and out per hour. Maintain technology and, when requested, deploy such technology which controls the routing of their delivery vehicles in order to mitigate traffic issues on surrounding roadways. 2)Construct a southbound left turn lane on 20th Avenue at Fairview Street on a mutually agreeable timeline in cooperation with Anoka County. 3)Escrow, or tender a letter of credit in the amount of $650,000 as a contribution to transportation related studies and improvements within the geographic area of the development’s traffic study, prepared by Transportation Collaborative and Consultants LLC dated 3-2-22, These improvements, which may include, but are not limited to those suggested in the applicant’s traffic study, must be identified within 10 years and constructed within 15 years, or the funds must be returned. 4)Contribute funds to the City’s Park Dedication Fund (in addition to the standard, required contribution) in an amount necessary to construct an 8’ wide bituminous trail to city standard specifications in the Fairview Street right-of-way, or another suitable location, between 20th Ave. and 21st Ave. This trail would not be constructed until the City and County complete a traffic study dealing with this issue. The City will accept this donation instead of requiring its immediate construction. The donation does not obligate the city to build the trail at any time, nor is there a sunset date on these funds, after which the City would give them back. 5)Contribute funds to the City’s Park Dedication Fund (in addition to the standard, required contribution) an amount equivalent to the cost of trees and shrubs normally required for this development, which have been eliminated from the site plan, due to their lack of public value, given their position on the site (being not visible from the public realm). A figure showing the required landscaping, highlighting the elements to be eliminated, shall be provided and approved by the city. This contribution will be verified by the City Engineer and contributed prior to approval of the final plat. th Avenue will 6)The existing volunteer vegetation on the west side of the site adjacent to 20 be maintained and replaced with equivalent material for the life of the project if it dies or is damaged, such replacement to be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer. 7)Anoka County and the City of Centerville find that the traffic-intense development of this site make it important to examine the 20th Avenue (CSAH 54 Corridor) through Centerville. The study of this corridor and the implementation of the study’s conclusions will undoubtedly take many years. Given the uncertainty of what the study will conclude with regard to the intersection at Fairview Street and 20th Avenue, and when any improvements here will be constructed, the project may move forward with their site plan as submitted. However, the land owner shall cooperate with the City of Centerville and Anoka County at such time that the two agencies may wish to improve the intersection of Fairview and 20th Avenue. This condition does not preclude the County and/or City from the need to follow standard, legal procedures for property acquisition, special assessments, or other such actions. The city and property owner endeavor to design such improvements, if necessary, with minimal impacts to the operational needs of the site user. 8)Snow removal operation shall utilize the snow storage locations as shown on the submitted plan, Revisions to the plan may be requested by the land owner and approved by the City Engineer. 9)The applicant will prepare, and share with the City, a noise study analyzing noise from the truck docks, van loading area, or other places on site where noise from facility operations are likely. Mitigation of this noise will be proposed to the satisfaction of City staff such that noise from the facility will not unduly disturb the expected quietude of residential areas west of the project site. The mitigation measures may include walls, fences, insulation, of other means. Noise from the site will be analyzed after one year of operation at the property owner’s cost and compared to the projected noise levels from the noise study. An escrow will be provided in an amount to be agreed to by the City Engineer to further mitigate from the facility should the results of the analysis after one year show that the original mitigation measures are not sufficient. 10)The fences around portions of the exterior of the site will be of a material to be reviewed th and approved by the City Engineer. The fence on the west side of the site paralleling 20 Avenue will be extended northward to the north edge of the van parking lot. 11)Construct an 8-inch public water main in the west right-of-way of 21st Ave., connecting the water mains in Fairview Street to those in Commerce Drive. 12)The applicant will enter into a development agreement for all aspects of site construction and engineering to be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer and City Attorney. 13)Final construction plans will be subject to review and approval of the City Engineer. 14)If and when the facility installs electric vehicle charging stations the owner will submit plans to the City for review which may require Site Plan review by the Planning & Zoning Commission. 15)Idling of any vehicle for more than three minutes is prohibited, except for limited circumstances that involve health and safety. 16)Users of the Subject Property will produce no noise, vibrations, air pollution, light pollution, fire hazards or noxious emissions which will disturb or endanger neighboring properties. 17)Users of the Subject Property will create no act of public nuisance or disorderly conduct, as defined pursuant to the City’s Code of Ordinances or pursuant to State Law. 18)Landowner will follow the applicable standards and requirements of the City of Centerville City Code, Rice Creek Watershed District, Anoka County, Army Corp of Engineers, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, and any other agency having jurisdiction over the Subject Property. 19)Landowner will obey all laws and regulation necessary to operate this truck terminal, and will obtain and maintain, in good standing, all licenses or permits necessary to operate this type of facility. 20)The Landowner is responsible for all the conditions set forth in this Permit. 21)In addition to all civil penalties and remedies for violation of this Permit, violation of this Permit is a misdemeanor criminal offense. CITY OF CENTERVILLE BY: _____________________________ D Love, Mayor Attest: _____________________________ Teresa Bender, City Clerk STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF ANOKA ) The foregoing was acknowledged before me this ___ day of _________________, 2022. by D Love, Mayor and Teresa Bender, Clerk of the City of Centerville, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to authority granted by its City Council. ____________________________________________ Notary Public \[REMAINDER OF PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK\] LANDOWNER By: \[INSERT OWNER TBD\] BY: _____________________________ \[INSERT OWNER TBD\] Its: \[INSERT OWNER TBD\] STATE OF ______________ ) ) ss. COUNTY OF _____________ ) The foregoing was acknowledged before me this ___ day of _________________, 2022, by \[INSERT OWNER TBD\]. ____________________________________________ Notary Public Drafted by: Kurt B. Glaser, Centerville City Attorney Berglund, Baumgartner, Kimball & Glaser, LLC 333 Washington Avenue North, Suite 405 Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401 612-333-6513 KGlaser@BBKGLaw.com \[REMAINDER OF PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK\] DEVELOPMENT & SUBDIVISION AGREEMENT BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF CENTERVILLE, MINNESOTA AND \[INSET NAME OF BANJO CLIENT HERE\] PREPARED BY: Kurt B. Glaser, City Attorney Berglund, Baumgartner, Kimball & Glaser, LLC 333 Washington Avenue North 405 Union Plaza Building Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401 612-333-6513 KGlaser@BBKGLaw.com DEVELOPMENT & SUBDIVISION AGREEMENT CENTERVILLE AND BANJO Draft Version 05/20/2022v3 – for Council Packet- Page 1 DEVELOPMENT & SUBDIVISION AGREEMENT FAIRVIEW SECONDADDITION THIS DEVELOPMENT & SUBDIVISION AGREEMENT (“Agreement”) effective May 25, 2022, by and between the CITY OF CENTERVILLE, a Minnesota municipal corporation (“City”); and \[TBD, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“Buyer”)\], \[_________________\] (the “Owner”). 1.REQUEST FOR PLAT AND DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL. Owner is under contract with Rehbein Properties, a Minnesota Partnership to acquire certain real property that is situated in the County of Anoka, State of Minnesota, and legally described on the attached Exhibit A, including easements described therein (the “Land”). Owner has asked the City to approve a final plat for FAIRVIEW SECOND ADDITION (referred to in this Agreement as the “Final Plat”) Owner seeks approval of the Final Plat for Owner’s intended development of an approximately 140,000 square foot office, truck terminal, and warehouse building, together with ancillary parking on the Land (the “Project”). The Project will consist of construction of the general infrastructure to serve the parcel and development of Fairview Street. 2. CONDITIONS OF PLAT AND DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL. At such time as the City approves the Final Plat, Planned Unit Development, land use documents such as a DEVELOPMENT & SUBDIVISION AGREEMENT CENTERVILLE AND BANJO Draft Version 05/20/2022v3 – for Council Packet- Page 2 Conditional Use Permit, or the Development Plans for the development (“Other Documents”), and the Owner receives the Right To Proceed as set forth below, the Owner may record the Final Plat and other land use documents with the County Recorder and/or the Registrar of Titles within one hundred (100) days after approval of the Final Plat. If the Final Plat or other land use documents are not recorded within the one hundred (100) days, the approval of the Final Plat or the Other Documents is void, unless a written request for an extension is submitted to the City Administrator before the one hundred (100) days expires. The extension will be approved or denied by the City Council by placement on their agenda within fifteen (15) days of request for same. Such Final Plat or Other Documents shall contain all land use permissions, use permits, easements, and other forms of permission and approvals as required for the construction and maintenance of improvements for the development. 3. RIGHT TO PROCEED. Within the Land, the Owner may not grade (except as authorized in a Permit issued by the City) or otherwise disturb the earth, remove trees, construct sewer lines, water lines, streets, utilities, public or private improvements, or any buildings until all the following conditions have been satisfied: 1) this Agreement has been fully executed or consented to by all parties to this Agreement and filed with the City Administrator and recorded against the Land, 2) the necessary Security (as defined in Section 19) has been received by the City, 3) the Final Plat has been approved by the City Council and is in a form ready for recording with the Anoka County Recorder’s Office, 4) the necessary easements, rights-of-ways, covenants or other land use documents have been recorded against the Land, and 5) the City Administrator has issued a letter that all conditions have been satisfied and that the Owner may proceed. The Final Plat will not be released to the Owner and may not be recorded until the necessary Security, as defined in Section 19 below, has been received and accepted by the City. The City DEVELOPMENT & SUBDIVISION AGREEMENT CENTERVILLE AND BANJO Draft Version 05/20/2022v3 – for Council Packet- Page 3 Administrator shall issue the Right to Proceed within two (2) business days after receipt and acceptance of the Security. 4. CHANGES IN OFFICIAL CONTROLS. For two (2) years from the date of this Agreement, no amendments to the City’s Comprehensive Plan or official controls shall apply to or affect the use, development density, lot size, lot layout or dedications of the approved Final Plat unless required by state or federal law or agreed to in writing by the City and the Owner. Thereafter, notwithstanding anything in this Agreement to the contrary, to the full extent permitted by state law the City may require compliance with any amendments to the City’s Comprehensive Plan, official controls, platting, or dedication requirements enacted after the date of this Agreement. 5. DEVELOPMENT PLANS. The Final Plat shall be developed in accordance with the following plans (“Plans” or “Development Plans”) which are on file with the City. The Development Plans shall not be attached to this Agreement. If the Plans vary from the written terms of this Agreement, the written terms shall control. The approved Plans are as follows: A.Project Narrative a.Dated March 4, 2022; Prepared by Ryan Companies. B.ALTA Survey a.Dated February 22, 2022; Prepared by Westwood Professional Services, Mathew J. Welinski, PLS. C.Final Plat – Fairview Second Addition a.Dated XXXXXX; Prepared by Westwood Professional Services, \[INSERT AUTHOR\]. D.Preliminary Plat a.Dated March 2, 2022; Prepared by Westwood Professional Services, \[INSERT AUTHOR\]. E.Architectural Plans a.Dated XXXXXX; Prepared by Ryan Companies, \[INSERT AUTHOR\] F.Civil Plans (Grading, Drainage, Erosion Control, Site Utilities) a.Dated XXXXXX; Prepared by Ryan Companies, Chad Lockwood, PE. G.Landscape Plans a.Dated XXXXXX; Prepared by Ryan Companies, David Patten, RLA. H.Electrical Plan (Lighting and Electrical Vehicle Charging) DEVELOPMENT & SUBDIVISION AGREEMENT CENTERVILLE AND BANJO Draft Version 05/20/2022v3 – for Council Packet- Page 4 a.Dated XXXXXX; Prepared by Ryan Companies. \[INSERT AUTHOR\]. I.Traffic Study a.Dated April 22, 2022; Prepared by TC2, Matt Pacyna, PE. J.Noise Study a.Dated May 17, 2022; Prepared by Kimley-Horn, \[INSERT AUTHOR\]. These Development Plans may include subsequent plan revisions, modifications, or amendments approved, in writing, by the City Engineer. All current and future site development of the Land shall be in accordance with the Plans and in accordance with the Final Plat, except for subsequent plan revisions, modifications, or amendments approved, in writing, by the City Engineer. 6. PUBLIC AND PRIVATE IMPROVEMENTS. The Owner shall install and pay for the following Public Improvements (“Public Improvements”) as required by the Development Plans. These Public Improvements are detailed in Exhibit D. All Public Improvements shall be installed in accordance with the approved Plans, the City’s subdivision ordinance; City standard specifications for utilities and street construction; and any other applicable law or ordinance. The Owner shall submit plans and specifications for the Public Improvements that have been prepared by a licensed registered professional civil engineer to the City for approval by the City Council. The Owner shall obtain all necessary permits from other agencies having jurisdiction over the Land before proceeding with construction of the Public Improvements. The Owner, at its sole expense, shall instruct its engineer to provide adequate field inspection personnel to assure an acceptable level of quality control to the extent that the Owner’s engineer will be able to certify, as a condition of City acceptance, that the construction work for the Public Improvements meet the approved City standards. The Owner, its contractors, and subcontractors, shall follow all instructions received from the City and Rice Creek Watershed inspectors, so long as in conformity with the Development Plans. The Owner’s engineer shall provide for on-site project management. The Owner or its DEVELOPMENT & SUBDIVISION AGREEMENT CENTERVILLE AND BANJO Draft Version 05/20/2022v3 – for Council Packet- Page 5 engineer shall schedule a pre-construction meeting at a mutually agreeable time and location with all parties concerned, including the City Engineer, inspector and/or consultants, to review the program for the construction of the Public Improvements. Prior to the pre-construction meeting, Owner shall supply a schedule of construction activities for the Public Improvements and shall amend the schedule from time to time as necessary. Before the Security for the completion of Public Improvements is released in total, iron monuments must be installed in accordance with Minn. Stat. Chapter 505. The Owner’s surveyor shall submit a written notice to the City certifying that the monuments have been installed. 7. PERMITS. The Owner shall obtain, or require its contractors and subcontractors to obtain, all necessary permits. Those permits obtained by Owner to begin work include, but are not limited to: A.Anoka County Permit for Work within the County Right-of-Way B.National Pollution Detection and Eliminations System (NDPES) Construction Site Stormwater Discharge Permit C.Rice Creek Watershed District Permit i.Wetland Impacts (if applicable) ii.Stormwater D.Department of Natural Resources (DNR) Dewatering Permit (if necessary) E.City of Centerville - Building Permit F.City of Centerville – Grading Permit for land disturbing activities. G.City of Centerville – Right-of-Way Permits for small utilities such as gas, phone, electric, cable TV. 8. TIME OF PERFORMANCE. The Owner shall install all required Public Improvements in the Development Plans with the exception of the final wear course of asphalt by December 31, 2022. Owner shall install the wear course by November 1, 2023. The Owner may, however, request an extension of time from the City. The City may exercise the power to delay installation of the wear course for a period no more than one year longer than the Owner’s deadline. If the deadline is extended Security posted by the Owner shall be updated to reflect cost increases and the extended completion date. The City may only exercise the power to delay installation of the wear course for good cause shown. DEVELOPMENT & SUBDIVISION AGREEMENT CENTERVILLE AND BANJO Draft Version 05/20/2022v3 – for Council Packet- Page 6 9. LICENSE. The Owner hereby grants the City, its agents, employees, officers, and contractors a license to enter the Land and any structures, trailers, and vehicles thereon, to perform all work and inspections deemed appropriate by the City in conjunction with the Final Plat development and the Public Improvements. 11. EROSION CONTROL. The erosion control shall be implemented by the Owner according to the approved Plans, and inspected and approved by the City. The City or Rice Creek Watershed District may impose additional erosion control requirements as required by law. The parties recognize that time is of the essence in controlling erosion. If the Owner does not comply with the erosion control plan and schedule or supplementary instructions received from the City or the Rice Creek Watershed District, the City may take such action as it deems appropriate to control erosion. The City will designate a contact person responsible for erosion control issues. The contact person will attend the pre-construction meeting. Except in case of emergency, the City will give 48 hours notice to the Owner in advance of any proposed action, but failure of the City to do so will not affect the Owner’s and City’s rights or obligations hereunder. If the Owner does not reimburse the City for any cost the City incurred for such work within thirty (30) days, the City may draw down on the Security to pay any costs. No development, utility or street construction will be allowed, and no building permits will be issued unless the Developer is in full compliance with the approved erosion control plans. The Owner shall require all contractors and subcontractors working on the Project to comply with the applicable law regarding erosion control. Those contractors and subcontractors are to be advised of the City standards as to how they may be required to post surety to secure performance. The City will work cooperatively with the Owner in securing Owner’s compliance with erosion control standards through the building permit process. 12. GRADING PLAN. The Final Plat shall be graded in accordance with the Grading Plan. Within thirty (30) days after completion of the grading and before the City releases any Security, the Owner shall provide the City with an “as constructed” grading plan certified by a registered land surveyor or engineer, with elevation shots showing that all ponds, swales, DEVELOPMENT & SUBDIVISION AGREEMENT CENTERVILLE AND BANJO Draft Version 05/20/2022v3 – for Council Packet- Page 7 emergency overflows and ditches have been constructed in accordance with the approved grading plan. Owner shall verify and submit to the City, lot corner elevations, pond depth, storm water ingress, and building pads. The City will withhold issuance of building permits until the approved certified grading plan is on file with the City and all erosion control measures are in place as determined by the City Engineer. The Owner shall be required to maintain all erosion control measures until written termination of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System permit. 13. DEWATERING. Due to the variable nature of groundwater levels and storm water flows, it will be the Owner’s and the Owner’s contractors and subcontractors responsibility to satisfy themselves with regard to the elevation of groundwater in the area and the level of effort needed to perform dewatering and storm flow routing operations. All dewatering shall be in accordance with all applicable county, state, and federal rules, and regulations. Department of Natural Resources regulations regarding appropriations permits shall also be strictly enforced. 14. CLEAN UP. The Owner shall daily clean dirt and debris from streets that has resulted from construction work by the Owner, its contractors, subcontractors, agents, or assigns. Prior to any construction on the Land, the Owner shall identify in writing a responsible party for erosion control, street cleaning, and street sweeping. During such times as construction is active, developer or his agent shall frequently inspect streets and make sure that they are swept of dirt and debris, and free from damage from transient vehicles attending to the site. 15. SITE PROVISIONS. A.Owner shall be responsible for security on the Land during construction. B.Owner shall maintain communication with the neighboring properties and address any concerns raised by the neighbors in a timely manner. C.Owner shall repair damage to the neighboring streets, curbs, trails, or other public infrastructure caused by construction of the Project, at their own expense. D.Owner shall provide traffic control for any work within the right-of-way. 16. OWNERSHIP OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS. Upon completion and acceptance of the work and construction required by this Agreement, the Public Improvements DEVELOPMENT & SUBDIVISION AGREEMENT CENTERVILLE AND BANJO Draft Version 05/20/2022v3 – for Council Packet- Page 8 lying within public right-of-way and easements shall become City Property without further notice or action. Those Public Improvements shall include those items identified in the Development Plans but may also include but is not limited to sanitary sewer, potable water system, storm sewer, roads, sidewalks, trails, draintile, signage and street lighting (unless owned by the utility). The extent of sewer and water service lines ownership is further defined in city code. The Owner shall retain ownership and maintain all ponds and other erosion control measures, and the Final Plat shall indicate an easement in favor of the Public for storm water use, access, and maintenance. However, the Owner shall maintain ponds and other erosion control measures until the development is complete in conformance with this Agreement, and provided that the engineer for Owner shall certify that the ponds have been cleaned and provide the designed holding capacity prior to the City certifying the ponds. All of the easements set forth in this Section must be reduced to writing and recorded on the Final Plat. 17. SUPERIOR RIGHT OF TITLE. The Owner agrees, and shall not cause any mortgage, lien, easement, covenant, or other encumbrance on title to the Land to be superior to any right or title the Owner grants to the City including but not limited to the Plat, Conditional Use Permit, this Agreement, easement, covenant, or any feature included on the Final Plat, including covenants for the maintenance of common open space, except by an express written authorization approved by the City Council. 18. ADMINISTRATION COSTS. The Owner shall reimburse the City for all of the City’s reasonable out-of-pocket expenses for this development including, but not limited to expenses incurred for legal, planning, engineering services, development agreement compliance and inspection services. The Owner shall deposit $20,000 and maintain with the City a minimum of $10,000 cash escrow for payment of these accrued or future costs in the amounts listed in city code. The City shall draw against the escrow to reimburse itself for all such costs and upon request shall provide the Owner with a detailed report itemizing all costs charged to the Owner by date, hourly rate (if applicable), time in tenths of hours spent, and description of the work or services performed. The Owner agrees that the City has the right to request additional deposits from time DEVELOPMENT & SUBDIVISION AGREEMENT CENTERVILLE AND BANJO Draft Version 05/20/2022v3 – for Council Packet- Page 9 to time based on the City’s estimates of future out-of-pocket costs and replenish such escrow. Unless excused by the City Council, the Owner shall maintain the escrow for a period of one-year after either the termination of this agreement or completion of all construction and the obligations set forth in this Agreement, whichever period is longer. These costs shall be detailed in invoices to the Owner. The City shall issue a schedule of fees for its known out-of-pocket costs and those of its consultants. The City’s annual, published fee schedule is available at CentervilleMN.com. Fees for professional services are stated below. Other costs shall be passed through to the Owner at cost. Professional Service Fees: Professional Fees City Staff Hourly Rate Public Works $75 Engineering$150 Stantec (planning, engineering, inspection) Phil Carlson, Planner $178 Craig Larson $166 Chad Johnson, Inspections $168 Brandon Johnson, EIT $136 Berglund, Baumgartner, Kimball & Glaser (legal services) Senior Attorney$300 Paralegal$110 Upon ten days written notice to Developer, the City may halt plat development and construction for any unpaid bills until they are paid in full, and the escrow replenished to its original amount. Owner that are not paid within thirty (30) days shall accrue interest at the rate of six percent (6%) per year until paid. City may at its option draw against the Security to reimburse itself for such costs. Before the City signs the Final Plat, Owner must pay or satisfy all of these costs, and any other unpaid governmental fees, assessments, judgments, or real estate taxes, plus any penalty and interest. DEVELOPMENT & SUBDIVISION AGREEMENT CENTERVILLE AND BANJO Draft Version 05/20/2022v3 – for Council Packet- Page 10 19.SECURITY. The amount of the Security is calculated as shown in Exhibit D. These calculations are for historical reference and are not a restriction on the use of the Security. Security shall be calculated in an amount for features as set forth in Code Chapter of 153, and “Site Security” as otherwise specified in this Agreement. The Security shall be for a term ending November 30, 2023, and automatically renewing annually thereafter unless notice of termination is provided to the City at least seventy-five (75) days prior to the end of the term or any renewal date. The notice given must comply with the formal Notice provisions of this Agreement. The City may make a claim against the Security, with a written notice and thirty (30) day right to cure by the Owner, for any violation of the terms of this Agreement or if the Security is to be allowed to lapse prior to the end of the required term or any renewal term. The notice and right to cure provisions shall be void if the Security will expire in less than thirty (30) days or upon discovery that the Security will not automatically renew (if such discovery is on or after the date that is thirty (30) days prior to expiration of the Security). If the required Public Improvements are not completed at least thirty (30) days prior to the expiration of the Security, the City may draw upon the Security. If the Security is drawn down, the proceeds shall be used to cure the default of this Agreement or held until the Owner has completed the Public Improvements. Upon the City’s receipt of proof to the City that Public Improvements and Owner’s obligations under this Agreement have been satisfactorily completed, financial obligations to the City and Owner’s contractors have been satisfied, and the required “as built” plans have been received by the City, the Security for the Public Improvements may be reduced from time to time pursuant to City policy regarding Security reductions. DEVELOPMENT & SUBDIVISION AGREEMENT CENTERVILLE AND BANJO Draft Version 05/20/2022v3 – for Council Packet- Page 11 Given the limited nature of the amount of Security based on the Public Improvements, Developer shall tender additional Security (“Site Security’) to the City in the amount of $500,000. Site Security may be used for the same purposes as Security. Developer shall tender no less than $50,000 of the Site Security to the City in the form of a letter of credit. Develop may tendered the remainder of the Site Security in the form of a performance bond. Site Security may be reduced after the later of the completion of construction of the Project or issuance of a temporary or final certificate of occupancy for the Project, and then only after all remaining conditions have been completed to the satisfaction of the City Building Official. The terms and conditions set forth in the Section are separate and distinct from security obligations to warranty improvements set forth elsewhere in this agreement. 20. CLAIMS & ACTIONS. In the event that the City receives notice of an audit or review from a governmental agency related to this Land or Final Plat, or the City receives notice of litigation regarding this Land or Final Plat, such claims will be forwarded to the Owner who shall promptly indemnify and hold the City harmless and make it whole. The Owner hereby authorizes the City to commence an Interpleader action pursuant to Rule 22, Minnesota Rules of Civil Procedure for the District Courts, and deposit the funds in compliance with the Rule, and upon such deposit, the Owner shall release, discharge, and dismiss the City from any further proceedings as it pertains to the Security deposited with the District Court, except that the Court shall retain jurisdiction to determine attorneys’ fees pursuant to this Agreement. 21. FEES. The following fees are required by law to be included in this Agreement and shall apply as a condition of plat approval. They must be paid in full before a building permit shall issue for the Land. These fees may be assigned, in whole or part, by Owner to the Buyer, for payment by the Buyer. These fee calculations are contained in Exhibit D. DEVELOPMENT & SUBDIVISION AGREEMENT CENTERVILLE AND BANJO Draft Version 05/20/2022v3 – for Council Packet- Page 12 A.Stormwater Area Charge (City) B. Park Dedication Fees (City) 22. FIXTURE INSTALLATION, ACCEPTANCE AND WARRANTY A. The Owner shall be responsible for the cost and installation of the Public Improvements consistent with the Development Plans and specifications approved by the City. Before the City signs the Final Plat, the Owner shall take responsibility for procurement and installation of same. The cost of the Public Improvements is set forth in the attached table, Exhibit D. B. Within 60 days after Owner delivers a complete set of reproducible “as constructed” plans and a set of electronic format “as constructed” plans for the Owner installed Public Improvements and a letter requesting acceptance by the City of such improvements, City shall review said Public Improvements and consent to and accept the improvements or provide Owner with a written notice of work that is unacceptable and what is required to make the work acceptable to the City. Upon completion of corrections to the unacceptable work, the developer shall, again, notify the City in writing and request acceptance of the work. The timeline above, then resets. If the City fails to provide a written notice of unacceptable work within 30 days, then the City shall be deemed to have accepted the Public Improvements identified in the Owner’s written request for acceptance. C. The Owner warrants all Public Improvements required to be constructed by it pursuant to this Agreement against poor material and faulty workmanship. The warranty period for underground utilities is two (2) years from the date of acceptance by the City. If all Public Improvements are installed by one contractor, the warranty period shall commence after the final wear course has been completed and the City has accepted the streets unless installation of the DEVELOPMENT & SUBDIVISION AGREEMENT CENTERVILLE AND BANJO Draft Version 05/20/2022v3 – for Council Packet- Page 13 wear course has been delayed by the City, in which case the two (2) year period shall commence on the later of November 1, 202##, or the requested extension date requested by Owner pursuant to Section 9 herein. If streets and underground utilities are installed by separate contractors, the two (2) year warranty period on underground utilities shall commence following their completion and acceptance by the City. The Owner or his contractor shall post security in the amount of thirty- five percent (35%) of final construction costs to secure the warranties. The Owner or his contractor may use the existing Security on file with the City, or a maintenance bond to satisfy this condition. The City standard specifications for utilities and street construction identify the procedures for final acceptance of streets and utilities. D. The Owner shall submit the Final Plat, construction plans and “as constructed” plans in electronic format. The electronic format shall be either AutoCAD, DWG file or a DXF file using Anoka County coordinates. The Owner shall also submit two (2) complete sets of the final plat and construction plans on paper (22 x 34 or 24 x 36). The Owner is responsible for supplying the county with appropriately formatted plat documents per the county’s requirements. 23. OWNER’S DEFAULT. In the event of default by the Owner as to any of the work to be performed by it hereunder, the City may, at its option, perform the work and the Owner shall promptly reimburse the City for any expense incurred by the City, provided the Owner, except in an emergency as reasonably determined by the City, is first given written notice of the work in default pursuant to the notice provisions of this Agreement, and given thirty (30) days to cure. This Agreement is a license for the City to act, and it shall not be necessary for the City to seek a Court order for permission to enter the Land. When the City does any such work, the City may, in addition to its other remedies, assess the cost in whole or in part. DEVELOPMENT & SUBDIVISION AGREEMENT CENTERVILLE AND BANJO Draft Version 05/20/2022v3 – for Council Packet- Page 14 Where neither the City or Owner can complete a requirement of this Agreement due to supply chain disruption or force majeure, such an event shall not constitute an actionable default or breach under this Agreement. The party claiming relief due to a supply chain disruption or force majeure shall give notice of this intent. In such an event, the applicable deadlines, provisions for holding Security, and provisions to cure a default shall be extended until such time as supply chain disruption or force majeure no longer exists, and thereafter for a reasonable period affording the Owner time to cure the default and the City to secure its remedies under this Agreement. 24. INSURANCE. Owner shall take out and maintain or cause to be taken out and maintained until six (6) months after the City has accepted the Public Improvements, public liability and property damage insurance covering personal injury, including death, and claims for property damage which may arise out of Owner’s work or the work of its subcontractors or by one directly or indirectly employed by any of them. Limits for bodily injury and death shall be not less than $500,000 for one person and $1,000,000 for each occurrence; limits for property damage shall be not less than $200,000.00 for each occurrence; or a combination single limit policy of $1,000,000 or more. The City shall be named as an additional insured on the policy, and the Owner shall file with the City a certificate evidencing coverage prior to the City approving this Development Agreement. The certificate shall provide that the City must be given ten (10) days advance written notice of the cancellation of the insurance. The certificate of insurance shall substantially comply with the form attached hereto as Exhibit C. 25. MISCELLANEOUS. A.The term “Agreement” as used herein, refers to the original terms and conditions of this Agreement between the Parties and any subsequent amendments or codicils to same. B.Third parties shall have no recourse against the City under this Agreement. DEVELOPMENT & SUBDIVISION AGREEMENT CENTERVILLE AND BANJO Draft Version 05/20/2022v3 – for Council Packet- Page 15 C.Upon a breach of this Agreement, and the breach has not been remedied within the applicable notice period, breach of the terms of this Agreement shall be grounds for denial of building permits, future phases of development, certification of occupancy, future planning or zoning applications, plats, or development contracts by or with Owner, assignees, owners of parcels within the Plat, or any party subject to this Agreement. D.If any portion, section, subsection, sentence, clause, paragraph, or phrase of this Agreement is for any reason held invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this Agreement. E.If building permits are issued prior to the completion and acceptance of Public Improvements, the Owner assumes all liability and costs resulting in delays in completion of Public Improvements and damage to Public Improvements caused by the Owner, its contractors, subcontractors, materialmen, employees, agents, or third parties. No sewer and water connection permits may be issued, and no one may occupy a unit or building for which a building permit is issued on a temporary or permanent basis until the streets needed for access are in a plowable and maintainable state and the utilities are accepted by the City. The building official, in consultation with public safety officials and the city engineer will make this determination. F.The action or inaction of the City shall not constitute a waiver or amendment to the provisions of this Agreement. To be binding, amendments or waivers shall be in writing, signed by the parties and approved by written resolution of the City Council. The City’s failure to promptly take legal action to enforce this Agreement shall not be a waiver or release. G.This Agreement shall run with the land and may be recorded against the title to the Land as shown on the Final Plat. The Owner covenants with the City, its successors, and assigns, that the Owner is well seized in fee title of the subject property and/or has obtained consents to DEVELOPMENT & SUBDIVISION AGREEMENT CENTERVILLE AND BANJO Draft Version 05/20/2022v3 – for Council Packet- Page 16 this Agreement, in the form attached hereto, from all parties who have an interest in the Land; that there are no unrecorded interests in the Land adverse the City and its interests; and that the Owner will indemnify and hold the City harmless for any breach of the foregoing covenants. H. Each right, power or remedy herein conferred upon the City is cumulative and in addition to every other right, power or remedy, express or implied, now or hereafter arising, available to City, at law or in equity, or under any other agreement, and each and every right, power and remedy herein set forth or otherwise so existing may be exercised from time to time as often and in such order as may be deemed expedient by the City and shall not be a waiver of the right to exercise at any time thereafter any other right, power or remedy. I.The Owner may not assign this Agreement without the written permission of the City Council, which shall not be unreasonably withheld by the City. J.The Owner shall hold the City and its officers, employees, and agents harmless from claims or audits made by it and third parties for damages sustained or costs incurred resulting from a violation of this Agreement. The Owner shall indemnify the City and its officers, employees, and agents for all costs, damages, or expenses that the City may pay or incur in consequence of such claims or audits, including attorneys’ fees. K.This Agreement shall terminate and be of no further force or effect on the date that all obligations of Owner (including warranty obligations) have expired, or upon such earlier date as agreed to by City and Owner. 26. SPECIAL PROVISIONS. This Agreement shall govern and effectuate the operation of conditions set forth by the Planning Commission for approval of the Final Plat by the City Council; and conditions set forth in the Planned Unit Development and Conditional Use Permit(s) issued by the City and recorded against the Land. DEVELOPMENT & SUBDIVISION AGREEMENT CENTERVILLE AND BANJO Draft Version 05/20/2022v3 – for Council Packet- Page 17 A.The future construction of public improvements contemplated by the Planned Unit Development and Conditional Use Permit(s) shall be governed in the same manner as Public Improvements and Development Plans as set forth in Section 5 and 6 of this Agreement. B.Funds held in escrow pursuant to this Section of the Agreement are separate and divisible from other funds held as Security pursuant to this Agreement. However, funds held in escrow pursuant to this Section shall be governed and used in the same manner as Security defined in Section 19 of this Agreement and as used elsewhere in the Agreement. C.Owner shall deposit $650,000 into escrow with the City. These funds are the Owner’s contribution towards transportation related improvements in the vicinity of the Land and shall be used for the purposes set forth in Section 26. These improvements include but are not limited to those improvements suggested in the Owner’s traffic study. These improvements must be identified within 10 years and constructed within 15 years. D.Owner shall donate $85,000.00 to the City’s Park Dedication Fund in lieu of constructing an eight-foot-wide bituminous trail. The City will accept this donation instead of requiring the immediate construction of the trail due to the complex nature of deciding whether this location and routing is appropriate. This contribution shall be in addition to the Park Dedication fee payment set forth in Section 21. The donation does not obligate the city to build the trail at any time, nor is there a sunset date on these funds, after which the City would return these funds. DEVELOPMENT & SUBDIVISION AGREEMENT CENTERVILLE AND BANJO Draft Version 05/20/2022v3 – for Council Packet- Page 18 E.Owner shall donate to the City’s Park Dedication Fund as compensation for any deficit in planting the legally required number of trees on the Land at a cost of $700.00 per tree. This contribution shall be in addition to the Park Dedication fee payment set forth in Section 21. This amount contribution will be verified by the City Engineer. F.Owner shall construct a sound wall and such other sound mitigation measures as reviewed and approved by the City Engineer. G.Anoka County and the City of Centerville find that the traffic-intense development of this site make it important to examine the 20th Avenue (CSAH 54 Corridor) through the City. The study of this corridor and the implementation of the study’s conclusions will undoubtedly take many years. Given the uncertainty of what the study will conclude regarding the intersection at Fairview Street and 20th Avenue, and when any improvements here will be constructed, Owner may move forward with their site plan as submitted. However, the Owner shall cooperate with the City of Centerville and Anoka County at such time that the two agencies may wish to improve the intersection of Fairview and 20th Avenue. This condition does not preclude the County and/or City from the need to follow standard, legal procedures for property acquisition, special assessments, or other such actions. The City and Owner endeavor to design such improvements, if necessary, with minimal impacts to the operational needs of the site user. H.Torrens Registration. As a condition of Plat approval, Owner shall either dedicate the sole Torrens parcel within the Plat to Anoka County, or obtain Torrens certification for all parcels within the Plat. The Torrens registration shall commence DEVELOPMENT & SUBDIVISION AGREEMENT CENTERVILLE AND BANJO Draft Version 05/20/2022v3 – for Council Packet- Page 19 within six months from the effective date of this Agreement. Owner shall conform the Plat once Torrens certification has been obtained for all parcels in the Plat. Owner may request the City Attorney to perform the Torrens registration. 27. NOTICES. Required notices to the Owner shall be in writing, and shall be either hand delivered to the Owner, its employees, or agents, or mailed to the Owner by certified mail at the following address: OWNER TBD ADDRESS & EMAIL With a copy to: LEGAL COUNSEL FOR OWNER ADDRESS & EMAIL Notices to the City shall be in writing and shall be either hand delivered to the City Administrator, or mailed to the City by certified mail in care of the City Administrator at the following address: City of Centerville City Administrator 1880 Main Street Centerville, MN 55038 With a copy to: Berglund, Baumgartner, Kimball & Glaser, LLC Attention: Kurt B. Glaser 333 Washington Avenue North, Suite 405 Minneapolis, Minnesota 55104 KGlaser@BBKGLaw.com \[REMAINDER OF PAGE LEFT BLANK\] DEVELOPMENT & SUBDIVISION AGREEMENT CENTERVILLE AND BANJO Draft Version 05/20/2022v3 – for Council Packet- Page 20 SIGNATURE PAGE TO SUBDIVISION AGREEMENT \[INSET NAME OF BANJO CLIENT HERE\] CITY OF CENTERVILLE BY: ____________________________________ D. Love, Mayor AND ___________________________________ Mark Statz, City Administrator STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF ANOKA ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this _____ day of ___________, 2022, by D. Love, Mayor, and by Mark Statz, City Administrator, of the City of Centerville, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. NOTARY PUBLIC \[REMAINDER OF PAGE LEFT BLANK\] DEVELOPMENT & SUBDIVISION AGREEMENT CENTERVILLE AND BANJO Draft Version 05/20/2022v3 – for Council Packet- Page 21 SIGNATURE PAGE TO SUBDIVISION AGREEMENT \[INSET NAME OF BANJO CLIENT HERE\] OWNER: BY:_____________________________________ \[INSERT NAME HERE\] ITS: \[INSERT TITLE HERE\] STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF __________ ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ______ day of __________, 2022, by \[INSERT NAME AND TITLE HERE\] of ________________________, on behalf of the________________. NOTARY PUBLIC \[REMAINDER OF PAGE LEFT BLANK\] DEVELOPMENT & SUBDIVISION AGREEMENT CENTERVILLE AND BANJO Draft Version 05/20/2022v3 – for Council Packet- Page 22 FEE OWNER CONSENT TO SUBDIVISION AGREEMENT ________________ the fee owner of the parcel as legally described in Exhibit A, the development of the subject property is governed by the foregoing Development and Subdivision Agreement, affirm and consent to the provisions thereof and agree to be bound by the provisions as the same may apply to that portion of the subject property owned by them. OWNER: Rehbein Properties, a Minnesota partnership BY:_____________________________________ Matthew Rehbein ITS: STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF __________ ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ______ day of __________, 2022, by ______________, __________________ of ____________________, a _________________________, on behalf of the ________________. NOTARY PUBLIC \[REMAINDER OF PAGE LEFT BLANK\] DEVELOPMENT & SUBDIVISION AGREEMENT CENTERVILLE AND BANJO Draft Version 05/20/2022v3 – for Council Packet- Page 23 EXHIBIT “A” TO SUBDIVISION AGREEMENT \[INSET NAME OF BANJO CLIENT HERE\] LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY BEING DEVELOPED, SITUATED IN ANOKA COUNTY, MINNESOTA: Parcel 1: The South 662.45 feet of the Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 24, Township 31, Range 22, Anoka County, Minnesota, as measured at a right angle to the South line of said Northwest Quarter. Abstract Property Parcel 2: The Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 24, Township 31, Range 22, Anoka County, Minnesota, which lies northerly of the South 662.45 feet of said Northwest Quarter as measured at a right angle to the South line of said Northwest Quarter. Abstract Property Parcel 3: That part of the South Half of the North Half of the Southeast Quarter Section 23, Township 31, Range 22, lying easterly of the centerline of County Road No. 54, Anoka County, Minnesota. Torrens Property (Certificate of Title No. 94125) \[REMAINDER OF PAGE LEFT BLANK\] DEVELOPMENT & SUBDIVISION AGREEMENT CENTERVILLE AND BANJO Draft Version 05/20/2022v3 – for Council Packet- Page 24 EXHIBIT “B” TO SUBDIVISION AGREEMENT \[INSET NAME OF BANJO CLIENT HERE\] SECURITY - IRREVOCABLE LETTER OF CREDIT DEVELOPMENT & SUBDIVISION AGREEMENT CENTERVILLE AND BANJO Draft Version 05/20/2022v3 – for Council Packet- Page 25 EXHIBIT “C” TO SUBDIVISION AGREEMENT \[INSET NAME OF BANJO CLIENT HERE\] CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE DEVELOPMENT & SUBDIVISION AGREEMENT CENTERVILLE AND BANJO Draft Version 05/20/2022v3 – for Council Packet- Page 26 EXHIBIT “D” TO SUBDIVISION AGREEMENT \[INSET NAME OF BANJO CLIENT HERE\] ESCROW FOR PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS & SUBDIVISION FEES DEVELOPMENT & SUBDIVISION AGREEMENT CENTERVILLE AND BANJO Draft Version 05/20/2022v3 – for Council Packet- Page 27 733 Marquette Avenue, Suite 1000, Minneapolis, MN 55402 Planning Report DATE: May 25, 2022 TO:Centerville City Council FROM: Phil Carlson, AICP, Stantec APPLICANT: Chad Lockwood, Ryan Companies REQUEST: “Banjo” Distribution Center, Planned Unit Development, Plat st ADDRESS: 6900 Block of 21 Avenue (Rehbein Black Dirt) PIDS: 24-31-22-32-0003 & 24-31-22-32-0002 OWNER: Rehbein Properties INTRODUCTION A national company proposes a 140,000-sq-ft distribution center on land owned by Rehbein Properties in the industrial park. The user is confidential for now; the project goes by the name “Banjo” and is represented by Ryan Companies. The site consists of three parcels thst and 21 Avenues, north of totaling about 40 acres, between 20 Fairview Street, south of Commerce Drive. The site is essentially vacant, being used for Rehbein’s large-scale black dirt operations. The site has street frontage on three sides: on the east thst and west along 20 and 21 Avenues, and south along Fairview Street. The northeast corner of the site touches the intersection of Commerce st Drive and 21 Avenue. Clearwater Creek angles across the northern quarter of the site, separating a 5-acre triangle of land, mostly wetland, from the rest of the site. Adjacent uses and zoning are industrial to the north and south in Centerville, as well as east across stth Avenue in Lino Lakes. To the west across 20 Avenue are commercial zoning and uses, 21 including the Creative Kids Academy daycare, Centerville Storage mini-storage, and Mechanical Air Systems. Land Use Plan and zoning map excerpts are included on the second page following. The project was discussed by the Planning & Zoning Commission on April 5, 2022, where they voted to process the request as a planned unit development (PUD), and then was considered at a public hearing on May 3, 2022, where the Commission recommended approval with conditions, which are detailed later in this report. May 25, 2022 Centerville City Council Page 2 of 18 RE: Banjo Distribution Center, PUD, Preliminary & Final Plat BACKGROUND Below is the originally submitted site plan, in schematic form. Some revisions to the plan are discussed throughout this memo. Originally Submitted Site Plan May 25, 2022 Centerville City Council Page 3 of 18 RE: Banjo Distribution Center, PUD, Preliminary & Final Plat USES Truck Terminal The proposed use involves bringing goods onto the site in trucks, unloading, sorting, repackaging them for distribution, and loading them into vans for delivery. The applicants describe the proposed uses as warehouse and office, noting the facility will distribute merchandise to customers. The zoning code table of uses lists “Warehouse/Distribution” as a permitted use in the Industrial district and notes “Truck Terminal” as a conditional use. There is no definition for truck terminal in the code, but the proposed Banjo facility meets a typical dictionary definition: TRUCK TERMINAL means a building, structure or place where trucks or transports are rented, leased, kept for hire, or stand or park for remuneration, or from which trucks or transports, stored or parked on the property, are dispatched for hire as common carriers or where goods are stored temporarily for further shipment. May 25, 2022 Centerville City Council Page 4 of 18 RE: Banjo Distribution Center, PUD, Preliminary & Final Plat Outside Storage Since the above truck terminal use is by CUP, parking of trucks and trailers also becomes an issue as “outside storage”. In 156.040(M), storage is regulated in the I-1 district (underline added): (M) Storage. For the purpose of this zoning district, car, vans and pickup trucks parked outside and used by employees and/or visitors in the normal course of the business operation will not be construed to be outdoor storage. Further, outside parked trucks and semi-trailers used in the normal business commerce will not be construed to be outdoor storage: (1) Provided that the total number of trucks and semi-trailers does not exceed the number of docks and/or bay doors; and (2) This use is not construed as an operation listed as a conditional use in any industrial zone. The proposed number of trailer parking spaces is less than the number of docks. Trucks and semi- trailers are part of a conditional use and therefore count as outside storage. It is implied that this outside storage of trucks and semi-trailers would be reviewed with a CUP. In Section 156.144 (M)(2), outside storage is also addressed, noting that “equipment . . . necessary to an approved business operation in a commercial or industrial district” is prohibited “except as specifically provided for in this chapter.” This outside storage “must be completely screened from adjacent properties and rights-of-way”. Together with the provisions in 156.040(M)(2), storing trucks and semi-trailers for the truck terminal use must be completely screened and reviewed as a CUP. Height Structures over 35 feet in height are only allowed by CUP, per Section 156.121(A). The proposed building would be 44 feet in height, so a CUP for that feature is needed as well. PROCESS The applicants originally applied only for a conditional use permit, site plan review, and preliminary and final plat. The truck terminal, outside storage and building height all need CUPs. The Planning & Zoning Commission chose the option of requiring a planned unit development (PUD) for the project as well, under Section 156.222: The Planning & Zoning Commission may require that any development be submitted as a PUD when in their opinion the proposed development could be best handled as a PUD. The key difference is that a CUP follows specific procedures and criteria outlined in the code and the project must still meet other standards, such as setbacks. A PUD may take into account other factors on and off the site and can vary from the strict standards in the code (without a formal variance) if there are benefits to the City or future users of the site. The Commission believed, and staff agrees, that the issues associated with this use and this site are best addressed with a PUD. May 25, 2022 Centerville City Council Page 5 of 18 RE: Banjo Distribution Center, PUD, Preliminary & Final Plat SITE ISSUES Loading Facilities/Screening The Zoning Code has standards for location of loading facilities in the Industrial District in 156.040(L): Loading facilities shall be on the side of rear yards. When adjacent to and/or visible from any public street, the facilities must be adequately screened. The Banjo facility has two “loading facilities” – the truck docks on the west side and the van st loading area on the south side of the building. The front of the lot is 21 Avenue, the rear is opposite the front by code, so the truck loading docks on the west are in the rear yard. They are th adjacent to 20 Avenue, however, so they still must be adequately screened. The van loading area on the south side of the building also qualifies as a “loading facility” – it is the area where 344 vans will be “loaded” with the packages from this facility for delivery. The south side of the building is a side yard, which does not allow a loading facility. There may be different ways to address this – enclose the van loading area completely within the building, rearrange the site to put it in the rear yard, or negotiate a satisfactory arrangement within a PUD. This is one example of how a PUD might be an easier and more useful tool in this process than a straight CUP. The landscape plan provides significant landscaping behind the loading docks in addition to th existing volunteer vegetation along 20 Avenue. An 8-ft chain link fence is proposed around the truck dock area. There is a 6-ft wooden fence proposed along the Fairview Street and part of the st 21 Avenue sides of the site, seen on the site plan and oblique view on the next page. There is also a 5-ft PVC-coated chain link fence between the van parking and the van loading areas. Another concern is noise from the van loading area that might be mitigated by enclosing this part of the operation. The City Code in Section 91.09(A)(3) stipulates: No person shall create loud and excessive noise in loading, unloading or unpacking any vehicle between the hours of 10:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. Potential noise issues will be reviewed in detail and negotiated within a PUD. The landscape plan proposes significant screening around and between all parts of the site which is reviewed within the PUD process. Traffic The facility will generate considerable traffic – 344 vans leaving in the morning and returning in the evening. The operation deliberately avoids the peak morning and evening rush hours: vans leave the site between 9:50-11:30 am, returning from 7:10-9:10 pm. Still, this traffic will have an impact on st Avenue. A traffic study has adjacent roads, especially the intersection of Main Street and 21 been prepared by the applicants’ consultant which is factored into the recommendations. May 25, 2022 Centerville City Council Page 6 of 18 RE: Banjo Distribution Center, PUD, Preliminary & Final Plat The study analyzed 7 different scenarios, including combinations of current traffic, 2025 and 2040 traffic, combined with or without the facilities traffic in both normal and peak seasons. A total of 10 intersections around the area were looked at, under each of the 7 scenarios. The major conclusions of the traffic study are: All intersections, during all scenarios continue to function at acceptable levels. The stacking capacity of turn lanes on 21st Avenue (north and south legs), will be st , in some of the future scenarios. These inadequate, blocking the closest driveways on 21 st Avenue. These inadequacies exist issues can be mitigated by constructing medians on 21 with or without project Banjo. Parks and Trails The project will include park dedication per the City’s ordinance. The City is not requesting land to be dedicated, but we recommend a future trail be included with the project on Fairview Street. The anticipated cost of the trail would be part of the park dedication for the project. This needs to be carefully considered, given roads and truck traffic in the area. There are trails in the western part of Centerville, th including one coming from the west to 20 Avenue south of Center Street, then extending th north on the west side of 20 Avenue. There are th no trails in this area east of 20 Avenue. thst Providing such a trail to connect 20 and 21 Avenues is a worthy goal, but only if there is a th safe crossing of 20 Avenue, which is a busy county road. This might best be accomplished with a crossing at a controlled intersection. That controlled intersection may take the form of a signal or roundabout at a realigned intersection th of Center Street and Fairview Street at 20 Avenue. The existing trails and possible future connection is illustrated above. The dark green trail would be st required as part of the Banjo PUD, to be built at a later date. The light green trail along 21 Avenue is a possible link at some point, shown on the Lino Lakes comprehensive plan. Together, these trail links would connect the rest of Centerville to destinations east, south and north. May 25, 2022 Centerville City Council Page 7 of 18 RE: Banjo Distribution Center, PUD, Preliminary & Final Plat Architecture & Building Materials The building is proposed to be 44 feet in height. Code allows buildings over 35 feet in height by CUP and with increased setbacks. This issue is dealt with in the PUD. The exterior materials of the building are proposed to be precast concrete panels painted gray, with a colored band at the top – see elevation and oblique site views below and on the next pages. There will be glass windows on the front (east) side where the offices are located. There are reveals in the concrete panels to lend interest, but what is proposed is essentially a very large gray box with a stripe around the top. The code in Section 156.040 (P) requires: Industrial buildings are required to be constructed of brick, decorative block or approved textured masonry product. Pole barn type buildings are not allowed. Buildings are required to have contrasting architectural features and must be designed to be aesthetically pleasing. The canopy over the van loading area is proposed with a standing seam metal roof to match the colors of the building. st Avenue) East Elevation (toward 21 Partial south Elevation (toward Fairview Street) May 25, 2022 Centerville City Council Page 8 of 18 RE: Banjo Distribution Center, PUD, Preliminary & Final Plat Similar building, photo provided by applicant Lighting Lighting is proposed on the building, under the van loading canopy, and around the parking areas on light poles. The lighting plan indicates the light poles will be 24’-8” or 37’-0” in height. All lighting is downcast cutoff type fixtures with less than 0.5 footcandle at all points on the perimeter of the site. The lighting under the van loading canopy is understandably brighter, but the photometric plan indicates that light levels fall off quickly to typical parking lot level of about 2 footcandles within a short distance out from the canopy. Signage Signage is proposed on the building and on two freestanding signs at the entrances. Signage will be reviewed in more detail in line with the City’s standards. Floodplain Much of the Banjo site south of Clearwater Creek is floodplain. This development would fill that floodplain and mitigate in areas north of the creek. This makes usable land out of the south area, while filling in the non-wetland areas north of the creek with floodplain, which would otherwise be small, awkward or undevelopable pieces of land. The result will be a larger complex of floodplain, wetlands, stormwater ponds between the creek and Commerce Drive. Having all of this area contiguous is better for wildlife habitat vs. numerous smaller disconnected areas. May 25, 2022 Centerville City Council Page 9 of 18 RE: Banjo Distribution Center, PUD, Preliminary & Final Plat PLANNING COMMISSION REQUESTS FOR FURTHER INFORMATION Embedded within the recommendations from the Planning and Zoning Commission were a number of issues on which they were requesting additional information or research be presented to the City Council, prior to final approval. Below, is information on those issues, based on the reports and figures provided by the applicant. Noise Concerns were raised at the Planning & Zoning Commission hearing about noise from the new facility that might impact nearby residential areas, mainly from the trucks and vans and their associated loading activities. The Commission recommended that a noise study be prepared by the applicants and potential noise mitigation studied. Kimley Horn prepared a technical noise memorandum for the applicant dated 5-17-22 which concluded that noise levels generated on the project site would likely add very little perceived increase in noise to the neighborhood and that mitigation (wall, fence, berm) would have very little effect and is not recommended. Estimated noise contours in the area from the memo are on the next page. I spoke with the memo’s author, Tad Hardy of Kimley-Horn Charlotte NC office, who offered the following: The memo estimates existing ambient noise as 45-50 dB(A). This is an estimate based on experience with similar suburban settings and did not involve actual measurements or noise monitoring on site. This existing ambient noise will be measured as a condition of approval to determine a baseline before construction begins. The memo estimates noise from the various sources at the Banjo project site as 44-48 dB(A). Not directly stated in the memo is the additive effect of the existing noise plus the project noise. Mr. Hardy said that adding the existing 45-50 dB(A) to the new 44-48 dB(A) amounts to an additional 1-3 dB(A) – the cumulative noise that would be experienced once the project is operational would likely be 46-53 dB(A), still below the city and state noise standards. Within the dB(A) noise measurement is the understanding that there will be occasional louder noises for very short periods of time. Background neighborhood noise levels will likely increase over time regardless of development on the Banjo site. Taken together, we conclude the following on the noise issue: 1)Existing noise levels in the neighborhood are modest. 2)New noise from various sources on the Banjo site would also be modest. 3)The combination of existing and new noise levels would be an additional 1-3 dB(A), a small increase. May 25, 2022 Centerville City Council Page 10 of 18 RE: Banjo Distribution Center, PUD, Preliminary & Final Plat 4)A wall, fence, or berm would not be effective in noticeably reducing noise from the site. 5)Existing noise levels should be measured before construction begins, then again after the site is operational to confirm the conclusions of the study, and to help the City decide if additional mitigation measures might be warranted. Noise contour maps form Kimley-Horn 5-17-22 memo Despite the conclusion of the noise study, there is the possibility that residents may find the intermittent noise throughout the night to be disruptive. The applicant has indicated a willingness to build a sound wall with the project, if that was something important to the community. May 25, 2022 Centerville City Council Page 11 of 18 RE: Banjo Distribution Center, PUD, Preliminary & Final Plat Site Configuration (Flipped Site Exploration) The Planning & Zoning Commission asked whether the site plan might be rearranged to “flip” the plan, putting the truck docks – likely the major source of noise – on the opposite side of the site. Ryan prepared a rearranged plan showing this, but it poses additional issues, including internal th traffic conflicts and stacking problems, increased traffic and potential stacking issues at 20 and Fairview, placing the building close to the street (vs. in the middle of the site in the original plan), placing the truck docks at a visible street corner, and drainage issues. We appreciate the effort to explore the rearrangement of the site but do not believe it is reasonable to require it. May 25, 2022 Centerville City Council Page 12 of 18 RE: Banjo Distribution Center, PUD, Preliminary & Final Plat th Realigned Fairview & 20 Avenue th The intersection of Fairview Street, Center Street and 20 Avenue is askew, with Center Street and Fairview Street being approximately 250 feet apart. With the relatively low volume of traffic on either side road, this intersection alignment has not caused major issues, to date. However, with the intensification of traffic on Fairview, combined with growing th Avenue traffic volumes on 20 (CSAH 54), the intersections alignment could become a problem. In particular, if a traffic signal or roundabout were ever warranted at this location, Fairview and Center Street would need to be aligned. With this in mind, the applicant has provided an alternative site plan (below, left). With this new site layout, the city and county would be able to realign Fairview Street, without the cost of reconfiguring Banjo’s parking lot. The new site layout allows for flexibility in Fairview’s alignment, whether for a signal or roundabout. With this proposal, Banjo would continue their commitment to a $650,000 contribution towards area transportation improvements, but th would not build the turn lane on 20 Avenue. Obviously, it would not make sense to construct a turn lane th on 20 Avenue, if ultimately, Fairview Street was realigned for either a signal or roundabout. City and County engineering staff have been discussing a Corridor Study which would help determine the appropriate intersection treatment here. The two agencies continue to work towards an agreement on the timing of any improvements. May 25, 2022 Centerville City Council Page 13 of 18 RE: Banjo Distribution Center, PUD, Preliminary & Final Plat PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION We recommend approval of the Banjo PUD and plat per Planning & Zoning Commission recommendations from May 5, 2022 (below), with modifications as noted in strike-thru (delete) and underline (add) fonts, respectively. Notes for discussion are in red italics. Planned Unit Development – Conditions of Approval 1)Peak Traffic Constraints - Limit delivery vehicle trips in/out of facility during AM/PM peak traffic (7 – 9 AM; 4 – 6 PM), to 285 or less combined total vehicles in and out per hour. Maintain technology and, when requested, deploy such technology which controls the routing of their delivery vehicles in order to mitigate traffic issues on surrounding roadways. 2)Construct a southbound left turn lane on 20th Avenue at Fairview Street on a mutually agreeable timeline in cooperation with Anoka County. \[this is eliminated in lieu of the revised site layout allowing the realignment of Fairview\] 3)Area-wide Transportation Improvements - Escrow, or tender a letter of credit in the amount of $650,000 as a contribution to transportation related studies and improvements within the geographic area of the development’s traffic study, prepared by Transportation Collaborative and Consultants LLC dated 3-2-22, These improvements, which may include, but are not limited to those suggested in the applicant’s traffic study, must be identified within 10 years and constructed within 15 years, or the funds must be returned. 4)Fairview Trail - Contribute funds to the City’s Park Dedication Fund (in addition to the standard, required contribution) in an amount necessary to construct an 8’ wide bituminous trail to city standard specifications in the Fairview Street right-of-way, or another suitable location, between 20th Ave. and 21st Ave. This trail would not be constructed until the City and County complete a traffic study dealing with this issue. The City will accept this donation instead of requiring its immediate construction. The donation does not obligate the city to build the trail at any time, nor is there a sunset date on these funds, after which the City would give them back. 5)Tree Mitigation - Contribute funds to the City’s Park Dedication Fund (in addition to the standard, required contribution) an amount equivalent to the cost of trees and shrubs normally required for this development, which have been eliminated from the site plan, due to their lack of public value, given their position on the site (being not visible from the public realm). A figure showing the required landscaping, highlighting the elements to be eliminated, shall be provided and approved by the city. This contribution will be verified by the City Engineer and contributed prior to approval of the final plat. th Avenue will 6)The existing volunteer vegetation on the west side of the site adjacent to 20 be maintained and replaced with equivalent material for the life of the project if it dies or is damaged, such replacement to be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer. \[this is eliminated because the property west of the lot has been dedicated to the county for May 25, 2022 Centerville City Council Page 14 of 18 RE: Banjo Distribution Center, PUD, Preliminary & Final Plat right-of-way. The future alignment of Fairview also affects whether this vegetation would be able to be maintained. These two conditions, make including this requirement problematic\] 7)Fairview Realignment - Anoka County and the City of Centerville find that the traffic- intense development of this site makes it important to examine the 20th Avenue (CSAH 54 Corridor) through Centerville. The study of this corridor and the implementation of the study’s conclusions will undoubtedly take many years. Given the uncertainty of what the study will conclude with regard to the intersection at Fairview Street and 20th Avenue, and when any improvements here will be constructed, project Banjo may move forward with their site plan as submitted (see revised site plan, allowing the realignment of Fairview). However, the land owner shall cooperate with the City of Centerville and Anoka County at such time that the two agencies may wish to improve the intersection of Fairview and 20th Avenue. If the intersection is improved within the 15 year time limit for the Area-wide Transportation Improvement funds’ usage, the city will construct the realignment and left turn lane with those funds and the property owner will sell the necessary land (up to one acre) to the city for $1. Such property sold from the property owner to the city shall not include property on which improvements have been made by the property owner in accordance with the approved plans. This condition does not preclude the County and/or City from the need to follow standard, legal procedures for property acquisition, special assessments, or other such actions. The city and property owner endeavor to design such improvements, if necessary, with minimal impacts to the operational needs of the site user. 8)Snow Removal - Snow removal operation shall utilize the snow storage locations as shown on the submitted plan, Revisions to the plan may be requested by the land owner and approved by the City Engineer. 9)Noise Abatement - The applicant will has prepared and shared with the City a noise study analyzing noise from the truck docks, van loading area, or other places on site where noise from facility operations are likely. Mitigation of this noise will be proposed to the satisfaction of City staff such that noise from the facility The study concluded that it will not unduly disturb the expected quietude of residential areas west of the project site. The mitigation measures may include walls, fences, insulation, of other means. Noise from the site will be analyzed after one year of operation at the property owner’s cost and compared to the projected noise levels from the noise study. If the monitoring shows levels to be at or below the model-predicted levels, no mitigation levels will be required. An escrow will be provided in an amount to be agreed to by the City Engineer to further mitigate from the facility should the results of the analysis after one year show that the original mitigation measures are not sufficient. In lieu of the noise monitoring, the applicant may construct a noise wall of a height and design which will eliminate noise increases to less then 1 db (A). 10)Fences – The opaque fences around portions of the exterior of the site will be of a durable composite, or high density polyethylene material to be reviewed and approved by the May 25, 2022 Centerville City Council Page 15 of 18 RE: Banjo Distribution Center, PUD, Preliminary & Final Plat th City Engineer. The fence on the west side of the site paralleling 20 Avenue will be extended northward to the north edge of the van parking lot. 11)Watermain - Construct an 8-inch public water main in the west right-of-way of 21st Ave., connecting the water mains in Fairview Street to those in Commerce Drive. 12)Development Agreement - The applicant will enter into a development agreement for all aspects of site construction and engineering to be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer and City Attorney. 13)Construction Plans - Final construction plans will be subject to review and approval of the City Engineer. 14)Electric Vehicle Charging Stations - If and when the facility installs electric vehicle charging stations the owner will submit plans to the City for review which may require Site Pan review by the Planning & Zoning Commission. 15)Air Polution - Idling of any vehicle for more than three minutes is prohibited, except for limited circumstances that involve health and safety. Findings of Fact for Approval of PUD 1)The proposed Banjo facility is a large, complex project which as submitted requires a conditional Use Permit for height of building over 35 feet, and does not meet the zoning standards for location of outside storage and location of loading facilities. It is therefore appropriate and reasonable to process the request as a planned unit development (PUD) which allows numerous site and building issues to be negotiated under one approval and development agreement. 2)The applicants have supplied information on traffic conditions at the proposed facility and have prepared a traffic study which identifies certain issues associated with the development. It is reasonable and appropriate to address these issues within the PUD process and to require the applicant to adhere to certain conditions and to pay for improvements identified in the traffic study that are necessary to mitigate these issues. 3)The project will have several hundred employees on site who will reasonably have a desire to walk or bike in the vicinity. Providing for a future trail adjacent to the project on Fairview Street or having the project contribute to the cost of this improvement is a reasonable and appropriate condition of approval. 4)The future trail identified above should reasonably connect to other trails in Centerville on th Avenue, to expand the network of trails in the vicinity. Being a busy the west side of 20 th county road, a safe crossing of 20 Avenue for pedestrians and bicyclists for this trail connection is needed. Therefore, it is reasonable and appropriate to have the City and May 25, 2022 Centerville City Council Page 16 of 18 RE: Banjo Distribution Center, PUD, Preliminary & Final Plat th County cooperate on a study of the 20 Avenue intersections with Fairview Street and Center Street to arrive at a safe crossing facility, which would connect to the future trail on Fairview Street in front of the proposed project. 5)The City has standards in the Zoning Code for landscaping and the provision of trees and shrubs on site. the proposed landscape plan does not meet this number requirement and it is therefore reasonable to have the applicant pay the difference so that the City can use these funds to provide similar improvements elsewhere. 6)The proposed truck loading docks on the west side of the proposed building are within th about 500 feet of single family homes on the west side of 20 Avenue, on Center Street, Eagle Trail, and Cottonwood Court. The van loading area also opens to the west toward this residential area. The project will have truck deliveries in the nighttime hours between 10 pm and 7 am, and the van loading area will have several hundred vans moving through the area with their noise and activity during daytime hours. The nearby homes may be adversely affected by the noise of these trucks and loading activity and therefore some kind of noise mitigation is appropriate. Follow-up to the noise mitigation will need to be done within a reasonable period of time to determine if the noise modeling was accurate. 7)The several hundred vehicles on site will add exhaust and fumes if they idle for long periods of time, adding to air pollution. Reducing idling time is therefore desirable and reasonable. 8)The 44-ft height of the building, above the City’s 35-ft limit, requiring a conditional use permit, is acceptable given the significant setbacks of the building from all exterior edges of the property, the screening achieved by landscaping around all sides of the site, and the general character and use of the property. 9)The outside storage of semi trailers in the truck loading area, requiring a conditional use permit, on the west side of the building is acceptable given that the number of trailers is limited and all goods and materials will be enclosed in the trailers. 10)The City has engineering standards for provision of utilities and construction standards which are reasonable for the health, safety and welfare of the people in Centerville. Preliminary & Final Plat We recommend approval of the preliminary and final plat for the Banjo facility property with the following conditions and findings: Conditions of Approval 1)As easement will be dedicated to the City over a portion of the southwest corner of the property, as illustrated in the Planner’s report of May 3, 2022, which would allow a realignment of Fairview Street in the future, should a future study conclude that it would be necessary. The applicant will work with the City Engineer and City Attorney on the legal May 25, 2022 Centerville City Council Page 17 of 18 RE: Banjo Distribution Center, PUD, Preliminary & Final Plat description, wording, and exact location of this easement. If the intersection at Fairview th and 20 Avenue is improved within the 15 year time limit for the Area-wide Transportation Improvement funds’ usage, the city will construct the realignment and left turn lane with those funds and the property owner will sell the necessary land (up to one acre) to the city for $1. Such property sold from the property owner to the city shall not include property on which improvements have been made by the property owner in accordance with the approved plans. \[With the revised site plan allowing the realignment of Fairview and an agreement to sell the property to the city, an easement is not necessary\] 2)The applicant will provide all other easements and dedications requested by the City Engineer. 3)Existing Parcel 3 of this property is now Torrens property. The applicant will register Parcel 3 as Abstract property, to be reviewed and approved by the City Attorney. \[This is no longer necessary. The Final Plat dedicates the Torrens parcel to the County for right-of-way\]. Findings of Fact for Approval of Plat th Avenue could benefit the area transportation network 1)Realigning Fairview Street at 20 and the provision of trail connections is an important part of the City’s park and trail network. Providing an easement for the potential future realignment of Fairview Street and th Center Street at 20 Avenue which can also include a trail connection is reasonable within the context of this development. 2)The City has engineering standards for provision of utilities and drainage, and securing easements for these facilities is reasonable and appropriate. 3)The City is interested in the orderly recording of property within the County’s system, which includes registering Torrens property in new plats as Abstract property. 60-DAY RULE The Site Plan application was submitted and fees paid March 9, 2022. The deadline for final action on the Site Plan was May 8, 2022. This has been extended as allowed by State statute to July 7, 2022, to allow for more time to process the request. The Conditional Use Permit (CUP) application for truck terminal, outside storage and building height was submitted and fees paid March 29, 2022. The deadline for final action on the CUP was May 28, 2022. This has been extended as allowed by State statute to July 27, 2022, to allow for more time to process the request. The Conditional Use Permit application for a Planned Unit Development (PUD) was submitted and fees paid April 12, 2022. The deadline for final action on the PUD was June 12, 2022. This has been extended as allowed by State statute to August 10, 2022, to allow for more time to process the request. May 25, 2022 Centerville City Council Page 18 of 18 RE: Banjo Distribution Center, PUD, Preliminary & Final Plat The Preliminary Plat application was submitted and fees paid March 9, 2022. The deadline for final action on the plat is 120 days, until July 8, 2022. ‚ ‚ ‚ ‚ ‚ ‚ ‚ ‚ ‚ ‚ ‚ p p p ‚ p p p ‚ ‚ ‚ ‚ ‚ DETAIL SEE EASEMENT 001TPGAMDNF 906.34 W " 82 75 ' . 33 1 4 ° 6 6 N W " 2 .7 3 9V 30 8N 'I 7 9. 16 ° 3 4 1 6 N FLOOD COMPENSATION AREA NAV NAV LAYOUT TOP OF SLOPE TOP OF SLOPE % 7 . 6 PROPOSED % 8 . 0 1 FFE=911.5 DOCK=907.5 141,360± GSF 577 VAN PARKING STALLS PROPOSED BUILDING 297 ASSOCIATE PARKING STALLS Project Banjo ¤ Fairview Relocation Exhibit ¤ 5.02.2022 CURRENT FLOOD COMPENSATION AREA PARKNI NOG TOP OF SLOPE N O P A R K I N G G N I K R A P O N TOP OF SLOPE 72T PN OM WR DN F 44.TOP OF SLOPE 20 9 TOP OFSLOPE TOP OF SLOPE SNART 9.309 33TP 08451PIDNF 897.07FNDIP.5PT26 3TPMICDNF 24.109 31.009 TOP OF SLOPE TOPCMP5 2TP08451PIDNF 895.6 43.998 TOP OF SLOPE MEETING VAN STALL REQUIREMENTWITH RETAINING WALLS DETAIL SEE EASEMENT 001TPGAMDNF 906.34 W " 82 75 ' . 33 1 4 ° 6 6 N W " 2 30 ' 7 9. 16 ° 3 4 1 6 N N O P A R K I N G G NI K R A P O N STORMWATERMANAGEMENT N GNIKRAPO FLOOD COMPENSATION AREA SLOPE ) TOP OF SLOPETOP OF TOP OF SLOPE UIRED Q 290 RE ( S TALL S G ONLY 141,360± GSF LAYOUT 577 VAN PARKING STALLS IATE PARKIN PROPOSED BUILDING 66 STALLS SHORT OF REQUIREMENT SSOC 224 ASSOCIATE PARKING STALLS (290 REQUIRED)224 A SITE VAN VAN STORMWATERMANAGEMENT FLOOD COMPENSATION AREA FLIPPED EXPLORATION Project Banjo • Concept Site Plan Rotated With Noted Challenges • 5.17.2022 EE SLOPSLOPSLOPE OFOF P TOP OF SLOPETTOP OF TOP OF SLOPETOP OF SLOPE STORMWATERMANAGEMENT 72T PN OM WR DN F 44.TOP OF SLOPE 20 9 TOP OFSLOPE TOP OF SLOPE SNART 9.309 33TP 08451PIDNF 897.07FNDIP.5PT26 3TPMICDNF 24.109 31.009 TOP OF SLOPE 5 2TP08451PIDNF 43.998 TOP OF SLOPE ALIGNMENT PENDING CORRIDOR STUDY -APPLIED TOWARD A MEDIAN AT THE SIGNAL TIMING REQUIRED$85,000 FOR FUTURE 8' TRAIL ALONG8" WATER MAIN EXTENSION REQUIRED BYCITY - BORING UNDER CREEK REQUIRED$700 PER TREE FOR CODE REQUIREDTREES TO BE USED BY PARK DEPARTMENT$650,000 FROM PROJECT BANJO FORWIDENING 21ST AVE TO 3 LANES, ORTHE TRAFFIC STUDY AREA THAT MAY BE FAIRVIEW RELOCATION - POTENTIAL FUTUREFUTURE WORK BY CITY AND COUNTYFAIRVIEW STREETBY CITYPOTENTIAL REGIONAL AREAOTHER REGIONAL IMPROVEMENTS WITHINNEEDED LONG TERM. IMPROVEMENTS. THIS AMOUNT CAN BEINTERSECTION OF 21ST AVE AND MAIN ST, DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT NOTES A BC DEF D FLOOD COMPENSATION AREA VAN VAN A % 7 . 6 % 8 . FFE=911.5 0 DOCK=907.5 1 141,360± GSF 577 VAN PARKING STALLS PROPOSED BUILDING 297 ASSOCIATE PARKING STALLS FLOOD COMPENSATION AREA ONPARNKIG Project Banjo ¤ Development Agreement Exhibit ¤ 05.20.2022 N O AP R NKI G GNI KR AP ON B C NO P ARKNIG N O P A R K NI G G NI K R A P O N Sheet 1 of 4 sheets . COUNTY OF ANOKA CITY OF CENTERVILLE SEC. 23 & 24, T. 31, R. 22 day of, 20 .. regular meeting thereof held this d this for public record on thisfor public record on this sed Land Surveyor in the State of Minnesota; that this plat; that all monuments depicted on this plat have ion 505.01, Subd. 3, as of the date of this certificate are . , 20 by Mathew J. Welinski. , 20 day of on the land hereinbefore described have been paid. Also, pursuant to Minnesota . , 20 day of , Deputy, Deputy, Deputy .M. and was duly recorded as Document Number .M. and was duly recorded as Document Number o'clock o'clock County, Minnesota , at , at , and said plat is in compliance with the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Section 505.03, Subd. 2. , 20 (Signature)(Name Printed) day of , 20 , 20 MayorClerkDavid M. Zieglmeier, Anoka County SurveyorProperty Tax Administrator day of day of County Recorder/Registrar of TitlesCounty Recorder/Registrar of Titles I Mathew J. Welinski do hereby certify that this plat was prepared by me or under my direct supervision; that I am a duly Licenplat is a correct representation of the boundary survey; that all mathematical data and labels are correctly designated on thisbeen, or will be correctly set within one year; that all water boundaries and wet lands, as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Sectshown and labeled on this plat; and all public ways are shown and labeled on this plat.Dated this Mathew J. Welinski, Licensed Land SurveyorMinnesota License No. 53596STATE OF MINNESOTAThis instrument was acknowledged before me this Notary Public, My Commission Expires This plat of FAIRVIEW SECOND ADDITION was approved and accepted by the City Council of the City of Centerville, Minnesota at a day of I hereby certify that in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Section 505.021, Subd. 11, this plat has been reviewed and approve Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 505.021, Subd. 9, taxes payable in the year 20Statutes, Section 272.12, there are no delinquent taxes and transfer entered this ByI hereby certify that this plat of FAIRVIEW SECOND ADDITION was filed in the office of the County Recorder/Registrar of Titles ByI hereby certify that this plat of FAIRVIEW SECOND ADDITION was filed in the office of the County Recorder/Registrar of Titles By COUNTY OF CITY COUNCIL, CITY OF CENTERVILLE, MINNESOTACITY COUNCIL, CITY OF CENTERVILLE, MINNESOTACOUNTY SURVEYORCOUNTY AUDITOR/TREASURERCOUNTY RECORDER/REGISTRAR OF TITLESCounty of Anoka, State of MinnesotaCOUNTY RECORDER/REGISTRAR OF TITLESCounty of Anoka, State of Minnesota ,of day of , : e the public ways and the drainage and rly of the South 662.45 feet of said Northwest nesota, as measured at a right angle to the er this centerline of County Road No. 54, Anoka County, ghway No. 54 as shown on this plat. by , 20 , day of County, Minnesota (Signature)(Name Printed) . Abstract PropertyAbstract PropertyIn witness whereof said Rehbein Properties, a Minnesota partnership, has caused these presents to be signed by its proper partn20This instrument was acknowledged before me this Notary Public, My Commission Expires KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS: That Rehbein Properties, a Minnesota partnership, owner of the following described propertyParcel 1:South line of said Northwest Quarter.Parcel 2:Quarter as measured at a right angle to the South line of said Northwest Quarter.Parcel 3:Minnesota.Has caused the same to be surveyed and platted as FAIRVIEW SECOND ADDITION and does hereby dedicate to the public for public usutility easements as created by this plat. Also dedicating tho the County of Anoka the right of access onto County State Aid HiREHBEIN PROPERTIESBy Print Name TitleSTATE OF MINNESOTACOUNTY OF Rehbein Properties, a Minnesota partnership, on behalf of the partnership. The South 662.45 feet of the Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 24, Township 31, Range 22, Anoka County, MinThe Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 24, Township 31, Range 22, Anoka County, Minnesota, which lies northeThat part of the South Half of the North Half of the Southeast Quarter Section 23, Township 31, Range 22, lying easterly of theTorrens Property (Certificate of Title No. 94125) R2 E2 . N E R Sheet 2 of 4 sheets G O R C, 1 R 3 E . T P R AW T U , Q 4 2 T . S E C A " E E 4 5 S 5 E5 ' . F H5 9 O T5 7 ° 2 8 5 8 N KAL ONIL FO SE YTIC FO STIMIL YTIC 6 0 0 4 PK NAIL 77.3231 E"80'31 00S COUNTY OF ANOKA 47.793 CITY OF CENTERVILLE 63.993 SEC. 23 & 24, T. 31, R. 22 0 21ST AVENUE SOUTH 0 40 000 . 0 F2.5. E 20 2 20 HO . 5 T E 4 / .3821 E"80'31°00S G79 F 1 R 0 O 10 , 1 W1 0 R VRETNEC FO ELLI S 37 E . . E6 NTIMIL YTIC YTIC FO S P 3 H R 1 T W O T 2 F C , 5 W O14.04. 31.97 E4" 2 2 2 4 N 2 .3 /W ' "1 E43.78 1C9 2 E1 H 03 °E S5'7 . TW 2" 4 98 4 .6 N45°38'37"W6 N1 2 °0 N' 011 4 4 1N66°13'52"W 6 0 54 . N 2° 4 9 8 N DOC. NO. 2145628.003 DRAINAGE EASEMENT PER W DRAINAGE & UTILITY EASEMENT " 7NO. 2145628.001 3 JUDICIAL DITCH 3 0 1 .' 8 6 EASEMENT PER DOC. 2 9 ° LS CAP NO. 15480 3 7 N W " 3 9 1 2 .1 ' 48 1 . T 0 2 9 °N 1 2 1 6E 2 3 7 . M E NEE " S G 8 A R 1 E ' , 7 1 Y 0 3 T ° I . 6 L IP 7 T S W U T , & 4 E 2 . G C A E N S I A F R O D T E W E " F 359 535 . .' 4 21. O 312 ° N 16 9 6 7 H H N C T T I U D O S L E A I H C IT D F U O J 37.57 E K 10N W"61'22°N E I EL R H C T MATCHLINE R R EO SEE SHEET 3 OF 4 SHEETS T N A 2 2W . R E A GE L R ,C 1 3 . W " P 8 5 4 W .1 ' T 5 0 , 2 0 4 2° 2 6 . 7 C N E S F O 4 / 1 3 W 0 . S 4 E 1 H T 3 is assumed to bear N 00°09'30" W.Denotes found Anoka County Cast Iron Monument.Denotes set 1/2 inch by 14 inch iron rebar marked with plastic capinscribed LS 53596, which has been set or will be set in accordanceFound Monument (See Label)Set PK NailFound PK NailDenotes Right of Access dedicated to Anoka County The west line of the NW 1/4 of the SW 1/4 of Sec. 24, Twp. 31, Rge. 22with MS 505.021, Subd. 10. unless otherwise noted on survey. F 1 O E 4 / " 1 4 5 W3 ' 0 N. 5 4 E 5 6   H 2 T 8 1 8 F O N E N I L H T R O N LOT 1 4 3 . 4 BLOCK 1 8 5 E " W 4 " 94 7 ' 7 1 .7 ' 33 9 ° 3 5 8 2° 8 6 7 N N DRAINAGE & UTILITY EASEMENT SCALE IN FEET 1 INCH = 60 FEET 60120180 0 2 2 10S E"61'22° 2 2 . . 01 E03.4 E G G R R , , 1 1 3 3 . . E P P " W4 W W " 4 2 T6' T 8 ,8 87 ,. 3 . ' 4 3 34 6 3 2° 25 6 . 2 8 . 3° 8 C C 6 E E7N S S N F F O O 4 4 E /"1 / 7 4 1. 1 4 '9 4 7 E W3 S° S 3 E4 65.96 E N H H 0N T61'22°1 W" T F F O O 4 4 / / 1 1 E W N N E 01 5 EH 0 TT. H 9 NT F 6 E FO 1 DRAINAGE & UTILITY EASEMENT M O R E U E R" N EN4 4 OR N' 7 RO M 3 C O °DRAINAGE &UTILITY EASEMENT NRIGHT OF WAYMONUMENT C E8 O 8 N R W N I E N T H SE T SW 1/4 OF SEC. 24, TWP. 31, RGE. 22 A H W &" CT WEST LINE OF THE NW 1/4 OF THE 2 4 '0 92 . 54.061 LS CAP NO. 15480 01/2 INCH IRON PIPE 9 °2.77 8 8.4 6 221/2 INCH OPEN PIPE E"03'90°00S 23.683 7 N 73.566 W"03'90 00N 63.536 10.76 NE 1/4SE 1/4 10 10 10 NUOC ID YT1 N HCTHCNAR 74 .OB ,74 NARB , .ON 1 HC 24 21ST AVE. S. E C R . E T M . S MR D O 0 CW 1 E I SW 1/4 1 NW 1/4 V R I SITE A F CO. RD. NO. 54 110 100 NOT TO SCALE 49.24 LS CAP NO. 15480 1/2 INCH IRON PIPE S89 27'20"E W SEC. 23 & 24, TWP. 31, RGE. 22 " SE 1/4 4 NE 1/4 9 0 0 . ' 0 1 8 3 ° 2 9 5 R 28 E 2 N N 23 . RE OG R C , R 1 E 3 T . RP A W U T , Q 3 T 2 SW 1/4 S . NW 1/4 E C E WNORTH LINE OF THESOUTH 1/2 OF THE NORTH23, TWP. 31, RGE. 22 1/2 OF THE SE 1/4 OF SEC. S E F H O T Sheet 3 of 4 sheets 0 4 1 E"80'31°00S 77.323 21ST AVENUE SOUTH SW 1/4 OF SEC. 24, TWP. 31, RGE. 22 0 EAST LINE OF THE NW 1/4 OF THE 4 F2 E 2 COUNTY OF ANOKA H O . T CITY OF CENTERVILLE E 4 1 E"80'31°00S 79.382 / G 0 F 101 1 R O SEC. 23 & 24, T. 31, R. 22, W 1 R S 3 E . E N P H R T W O T F C , O E4 S 2 4 /. E 1 C H E T S W N 1 0 0 0 DRAINAGE & UTILITY EASEMENT . 5 8 3 2 2 . E G R , 1 3 . P T W T E , 4 E 2 . R C E T S S F O T E E F W 5 E 4 I . 2 6 V 6 5 R H I 5 T. U 5 A O 1 F S 3 E 1 H T F W " O 5 E 4 N ' I L 7 3 H ° T R 8 O 8 S N 0303 9 Y 0 T I 0 . MATCHLINE L I 6 T 6 SEE SHEET 2 OF 4 SHEETS U4 2 & 9 9 E 1 G . A O N IN 1 . A 5 RC. is assumed to bear N 00°09'30" W.Denotes found Anoka County Cast Iron Monument.Denotes set 1/2 inch by 14 inch iron rebar marked with plastic capinscribed LS 53596, which has been set or will be set in accordanceFound Monument (See Label)Set PK NailFound PK NailDenotes Right of Access dedicated to Anoka County The west line of the NW 1/4 of the SW 1/4 of Sec. 24, Twp. 31, Rge. 22with MS 505.021, Subd. 10. unless otherwise noted on survey.5 DO 7 , D 2 Y 1 R A E E W P " D T5 A4 ' N E7 O 3 R M ° E 8 S 8 A N E LOT 1 BLOCK 1 E 2 2 H . T E F G O R , 4 /1 13 . P W NW T E , H 4 T 2 . F C O E ES F N I O L 4 H / T 1 U OW SS 4.266 5 SCALE IN FEET T 1 INCH = 60 FEET 60120180 E E R T S W 0 E I V R I A F 0N "61'22°1 6.301 W 4 W " 4 0 4 '0 . 7 3 3 6 ° 8 8 S 1 0 W7 " 9 8. 02 ' 2 0 0 1 .2 0 1 ° 6 1E 3 0 03 " 7 4 N 4 ' 7 3 ° 8 8 DETAIL N DRAINAGE & UTILITY EASEMENT W " 4 2 4 SEE SHEET 4 OF 4 SHEETS ' 0 . 7 0 3 8 ° 8 54.0618 LS CAP NO. 15480 1/2 INCH IRON PIPESW 1/4 OF SEC. 24, TWP. 31, RGE. 22 WEST LINE OF THE NW 1/4 OF THE UTITLITY & DRAINAGE EASEMENTPER DOC. NO. 1354080.0 2.77S 1/2 INCH OPEN PIPE 0°00S E"03'9 73.566 0 124.94 10 10 110 63.536 E"03'90°00S 1 HCNA RB ,74 .ON HCTID YTN UOC 0 1 NE 1/4SE 1/4 0 L = 3 12 . 08 0 . 0 R 1= 24 00.692 E8 "00'40°00N615.45 0 1 0. ACCESS 8 0 0 = 9 0 5° 4 LIMITED0 4' .5 ." 0 0 20TH AVENUE SOUTH 1 3 ACCESS LIMITED 50.17 21ST AVE. S. E C R N89°23'31"W . E T M . 0 S 0 RSOUTH LINE OF THE SOUTH31, RGE. 22 M THE SE 1/4 OF SEC. 23, TWP. 1/2 OF THE NORTH 1/2 OF 1 0 D O 1 W1 C E I 49.24 SW 1/4 NW 1/4 N09°50'45"W V R I SITE A LS CAP NO. 15480 F 1/2 INCH IRON PIPE CO. RD. NO. 54 S89°27'20"E NOT TO SCALE 06 SEC. 23 & 24, TWP. 31, RGE. 22 NE 1/4SE 1/4 23 NORTH LINE OF THESOUTH 1/2 OF THE NORTH23, TWP. 31, RGE. 22 1/2 OF THE SE 1/4 OF SEC. SW 1/4 NW 1/4 Sheet 4 of 4 sheets COUNTY OF ANOKA CITY OF CENTERVILLE SEC. 23 & 24, T. 31, R. 22 SCALE IN FEET 1 INCH = 20 FEET 204060 DETAIL 0 00.03 00.03 1 0 T N E M E S. A T E S Y T I L I T W U E & I E G V A R N I I A R A D F LOT 1 5 5 1 . 5 . 5 5 1 7 DRAINAGE & UTILITY EASEMENT 3 2 1 1 E " 5 W 4 " ' 7 5 3 4 ° ' 8 7 8 3 N ° 8 PER DOC. NO. 1468569 UTILITY & DRAINAGE EASEMENT 8 UTILITY & DRAINAGE EASEMENTPER DOC. NO. 1354080.0 S N 0 °7 1 '0 1 "5 W 1 21 3. 5 SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT PERDOC. NOS. 1470492.0 & 1455073.0 W " 3 9 00.56 0 5' . 5 2 4 2 ° 96 80 . S DRAINAGE & UTILITY EASEMENT 5 5 40.0000.06 N89°23'31"W 15.45 W UTILITY & DRAINAGE EASEMENTPER DOC. NO. 1354080.0 " 4 90 ' 8 .7 84 ° 1 2 08 10 1S 63.536 E"03'90°00S 13.011 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 3 0 4 0 0 . 0 N 0 3 9 ° 5 0 4' 5 " W 5 0 1. 7 20TH AVENUE SOUTH 00.56 00.06 L 3= 12 08. =R 81 06 0. 8 00.521 = °9 45 54' " PER DOC. NO. 341326 SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT OF THE NORTH 1/2 OF THE SE 0SOUTH LINE OF THE SOUTH 1/2 1/4 OF SEC. 23, TWP. 31, RGE. 22 0 1 -------- DRAWINGS CONSTRUCTION RCD SUBMITTAL DWP04/22/22 DESIGN DEVELOPMENTRCWD/CITY SUBMITTAL -------- 03/04/202203/16/202204/06/202204/22/2022 ISSUE RECORD RYAN A+E, INC. 01 020304 -------- 2022 ISSUE #DATEDESCRIPTION WWW.RYANCOMPANIES.COM 4145804/06/2022© JOB NO.DATE CONSULTANTS CONSTRUCTION CENTERVILLE, MN I hereby certify that this plan, specification orreport was prepared by me or under my directsupervision and that I am a duly licensedLANDSCAPE ARCHITECT under the laws of thestate of Minnesota.DAVID W. PATTEN REGISTRATION NO.DATE 701235 SUBMITTAL RYAN A+E, INC.533 South Third Street, Suite 100Minneapolis, MN 55415612-492-4000 tel612-492-3000 fax PRELIMINARYNOT FOR PROJECT INFORMATION PROJECT BANJO DRAWN BYCHECKED BY DDQ RCWD/CITY LANDSCAPEPLANTING PLAN L400 THE PARKING LOT THAT IS 16 23 32104 717 2727214QTY2122QTYQTY79275840QTY52535453 1717172 B&BB&B8B&BB&B36B&BB&B20B&BB&BB&B15B&B9B&B18B&BB&B10 33.04 AC/1,439,393 SF NO DEFICINECY FOR SHRUBS TREES REQUIRED IS 480 TREES 2.5" Cal.2.5" Cal.2.5" Cal.2.5" Cal.2.5" Cal.2.5" Cal.2.5" Cal.2.5" Cal.2.5" Cal.2.5" Cal.2.5" Cal.2.5" Cal.2.5" Cal.6` Ht.B&B306` Ht.B&B6` Ht.B&B86` Ht.B&B6` Ht.B&B4#5Cont.99#3Cont.94#3Cont.119#3Con t.69#5Cont.52#3Cont.#7, Cont.#7, Cont.#7, Cont.#7, Cont.#1, Cont.#1, Cont.#1, Cont.#1, Cont. t e` z a a`locus t y ` es mn Bl u ll Fit auienna y h` e S m `F nii `A u ae r ommon Hone z e a m aC h len Mapl Elm gg ee rreemanii ` G ffe River Birc g ade sacc l mn Bl r ar Maplr x u gt leditsia triacanthos inermis ceuceuienna eritaeltis occidentalisommon Hackberrlmus x `Accoladecco Acer platanoides `Crimson Sentry`Crimson Sentry MapleAcer saccharum `Fall Fiesta`ASugar MapleSAcer x freemanii `Autumn Blaze`AAutumn BlazeAAcer x freemanii `Sienna`Acer x Sienna Glen MapleSCeltis occidentalisCCommon HackberryCThornless Common HoneylocustThornless Syringa reticulataJapanese Tree LilacTilia cordataAccolade ElmAAbies balsameaWhite SpruceWhite PineCornus alba `Prairie Fire`Spiraea x bumalda `Anthony Waterer`Anthony Waterer SpiraeaSpiraea x bumalda `Neon Flash`Viburnum lantana `Mohican`Juniperus chinensis `Sea Green`Sea Green JuniperJuniperus scopulorum 'Medora'Juniperus scopulorum 'Wichita Blue'Wichita Blue JuniperThuja occidentalis 'Holmstrup'Thuja occidentalis 'Techny'Techny ArborvitaeAndropogon gerardii 'Red October'Calamagrostis x acutiflora 'Stricta' Betula nigra `Heritage`Betula nigra `Heritage`Heritage River BirchHGleditsia triacanthos inermisGMalus x `Pink Spires`Pink Spires Crab ApplePrunus sargentii `JFS-KW58` TMPink Flair Sargent CherryLittleleaf LindenUlmus americana 'Princeton'Princeton American ElmUlmus x `Accolade`UBalsam FirPicea abiesNorway SprucePicea glaucaPicea glauca densataBlack Hills SprucePinus albaPrairie Fire DogwoodFothergilla major `Blue Shadow`Mountain WitchalderNeon Flash SpireaMohican ViburnumMedora JuniperHolmstrup ArborvitaeRed October Big BluestemKarl Foerster Feather Reed GrassMiscanthus sinensis 'Purpurescens'Flame GrassPanicum virgatum 'Northwind'Northwind Switch Grass F SRA N ACASFAARAAFAFTCABVLMJCSJSMJSWTHOTOTARO BNBCOCOGTGTMPPSSRUAPUAUPAPWHPGPWCAPFMBSBASBNCSMSPPN TREES REQUIRED IS 488 TREES.TREES PROPOSED IS 314 TREES.SHRUBS REQUIRED IS 668.SHRUBS PROPOSED IS 668. DECIDUOUS TREES: 229EVERGREEN TREES: 85 THE TOTAL QUANTITY OF THE TOTAL QUANTITY OF THE TOTAL QUANTITY OF THE TOTAL QUANTITY OF FOR VERIFYING THE PLANT COUNTS ON PLANISLANDS SHALL RECEIVE ROCK MULCH PER SPECIFICATIONS PLANT SCHEDULE GRASSESCODEBOTANICAL / COMMON NAMESIZECONTAINER DECIDUOUS TREESCODEBOTANICAL / COMMON NAMESIZECONTAINERQTYEVERGREEN TREESCODEBOTANICAL / COMMON NAMESIZECONTAINERDECIDUOUS SHRUBSCODEBOTANICAL / COMMON NAMESIZECONTAINEREVERGREEN SHRUBSCODEBOTANICAL / COMMON NAMESIZECONTAINER LANDSCAPE PLANTING PLAN NOTES 2.REFER TO L-500 FOR LANDSCAPE NOTES & DETAILS3.THE LANDSCAPE PLANT LIST IS FOR THE CONVENIENCE TO THE LANDSCAPE SUBCONTRACTOR. THE LANDSCAPE SUBCONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE4.ALL TREES AND SHRUBS SHALL RECEIVE 3" OF SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH IN AREAS OUTSIDE OF THE PARKING LOT ISLANDS, PARKING LOT5.THE TOTALS IN THE PLANT SCHEDULE ARE FOR THE ENTIRE SITE6.REFER TO SHEETS L-401, L402, L-403 & L-404 FOR TREE LABELING7.REFER TO SHEETS L-405 L-406 & L-407 FOR SHRUB LABELING TREE CANOPY AREA CALCULATIONS THE QUANTITY OF PROPOSED TREES AND SHRUBS HAS BEEN DETERMINED BY THE LANDSCAPE STANDARDS IN THE CITY CODE.TREE CALCULATIONS ARE BASED ON 1 TREE / 3000 SF OF THE DISTURBED SITE AREA (33.63 AC/1,464,923 SF).THE TOTAL QUANTITY OF SHRUBS REQUIRED IS BASED ON 1 SHRUB / 10 LF OF THE BUILDING PERIMETER OF 1,702.83 LF AND THE PERIMETER OF4,979 LF.PLANTING SCHEDULE 1.REFER TO GRADING PLAN FOR GRADING AND EROSION CONTROL INFORMATION 822432321124462212242 ACTCARAFSRSRARTCACAFAFGTPSSRGTTCAF MP UAPUAPUAP 80160 N 4242 4242 SCALEINFEET JCSFMBSBASBN JCS FMBSBASBN 0 EVERGREEN TREES: 85 DECIDUOUS TREES: 199 3 AF 12212 222 12 122SBASBNJCSFMB 222JCSVLMSBAFMB 12JCS 2122JCSSBASBNFMB 22VLMSBAFMB JCS JCSVLMFMBSBASBNFMB SBA FLOOD COMPENSATION AREA 3 CO 121 10SR GTMPPS 6 AC12 ASF 1 GT X 1 12211 21 SR 1JCS 1122JCSSBNUAP 2SBAFMBFMB 21SBNJCS 2112JCSSBAFMBFMB 1SBNJCS JCSSBAFMBFMB AR 1 TC 3 TC 3 1 VAN PWH PANAV DEFICIENT BY 196 TREES X THE NEW TOTAL QUANTITY OF TREES PROPOSED IS 284 TREES. 21 5 PWPG FENCE - 6FT TALL OPAQUE ARO TOP OF SLOPE 3 AB 5 PN 111 28422244876 JCSJCSVLMJCSVLM SBAFMBVLMFMBSBACAPSBNFMBSBA TOP OF SLOPE 1 2 22TC AB AB6 PG4 CS UAP X 6 X MSP SEE SHEET 404 & 407 SEE SHEET 402 & 405 1 AF X 4 CO 2 2AF 6 PA UA X 5 GT 10 X PA 2 6PWH BN X 21112344384383 SBAJCSFMBVLMSBNFMBSBAJCSVLMJCSCAPSBNSBAVLM 5 AR 6 PG 3 AF XX 25 ARO 6 X AR 6.7%X 25 PN 5 CO X 2 AF 24 CS 5 GT 1%8.0 X X 26 MSP3 141,360 GSF UAP 141,360± GSF X 21114242 JCSJCS SBAFMBVLMFMBSBASBN 3 TC X PROPOSED BUILDING X PROPOSED BUILDING 4242 JCSSBASBN FMB X 2 AF X X 2111 SBAJCSFMBVLM X XX FENCE - 6FT TALL OPAQUE 7 AB FLOOD COMPENSATION AREA X X 6 X 2 PG PA X 22 ARO XXX XXX 23 PN PARKI NONG X 21 5AB TOP OF SLOPE ACPWH 424434242 CAPJCSSBASBNJCSSBASBN FMBFMB 22 MSP N O 3 XXXPAF A XXX R K CS23 I N G G N I K R A X P O N 3 UAP TOP OF SLOPE SEE SHEET 401 4 TC SEE SHEET 403 & 405 TOP OF SLOPE TOP OFSLOPE TOP OF SLOPE SNART 9.309 TOP OF SLOPE 11112112241233313123211242312 BNBNBNAFBNPSAB14ARAFBNABBNARAR2AF GTUAUACOGTPGPAPGPAPWCOUA ASFASF PWHCO TOP OF SLOPE R:\\Projects\\701\\200\\701-235 Amazon - Centerville, MN AMZL\\02 LA\\01 CAD\\02 Sheet Files\\L400 LANDSCAPE PLANTING PLAN.dwgR:\\Projects\\701\\200\\701-235 Amazon - Centerville, MN AMZL\\02 LA\\01 CAD\\02 Sheet Files\\L400 LANDSCAPE PLANTING PLAN.dwg DRAFT REPORT To: Ryan Companies US, Inc. From: Matt Pacyna, PE, Principal Transportation Collaborative & Consultants, LLC Date:April 22, 2022 Subject:Project Banjo Traffic Study ‘ Regional Analysis Addendum INTRODUCTION TC2 has completed a traffic study addendum for the proposed logistics warehousedevelopment, referred to as Project Banjo, in the City of Centerville, MN. This addendumwas developed in response to agency feedback receivedregarding the draft Project Banjo Traffic Studysubmitted in early March 2022. This addendum incorporates previous studyfindings while also providing additional detail and analysis as requested. The development is generally located southwest of the Interstate 35E (I-35E)and Main Street/County Road 14(CR 14) interchange. The subject site shown in Figure 1is currently vacant th and bounded by Commerce Drive to the north, Fairview Street to the south, 20Avenue/County st Road 54(CR 54)to the west, and 21Avenue to the east. The main objectives of this study are to quantifyexisting operations within the study area, evaluate potential traffic impacts to the adjacent roadway network due to the proposed development, and identify potential improvements to support the proposed development to ensure safe and efficient operations for all users. The following study assumptions, methodology, and findings are offered for consideration. Figure 1 Subject Site |www.transportationcollaborative.com | Project BanjoTraffic Study ‘ Regional Analysis AddendumApril 22, 2022 Page 2 EXISTING CONDITIONS Existing conditions were reviewed within the study area to establish current operations to help determine impacts associated with the proposed development. The evaluation of existing conditions included collecting traffic volumes, observing roadway characteristics, and analyzing intersection capacity, which are described in the following sections. Traffic Volumes The following intersections were included as part of the studyprocess. th 20Avenue (CR 54) / Main Street (CR 14) th 20Avenue (CR 54) / Commerce Drive th 20Avenue (CR 54) / Fairview Street th 20Avenue (CR 54) / Cedar Street st 21Avenue / Main Street (CR 14) st 21Avenue / Commerce Drive st 21Avenue /Fairview Street (Future) Main Street (CR 14) / I-35E West Ramp Main Street (CR 14) / I-35E East Ramp Intersection turning movement and pedestrian/bicyclist counts were collected on Thursday, February 3, 2022,at the majority ofthe study intersections. The counts were collected from 7 to 11 a.m. and 4 to 6 p.m., which coincides with the peak activity of the adjacent roadways and/or the proposed development. Note that 14-hours of data (6 a.m. to 8 p.m.) was collected along Main thst Street at 20 Avenue and 21Avenue. At the Main Street (CR 14) intersections with I-35E, a combination of historical counts and newly collected data using ramp detector data provided by the MinnesotaDepartment of Transportation (MnDOT)were used to identify area travel patterns and traffic volumes. Average daily traffic (ADT) volumes were also obtained from MnDOT. Roadway Characteristics Observations were conducted within the study area to identify various roadway characteristics such as roadway geometry,functional classification, multimodal facilities, speed limits, and traffic controls. The following information provides a general overview of key roadways within the study area. Note that these are general characteristics. Main Street (CR 14) ‘ generally a four-lane divided minorarterial roadwaywith turn lanes at key intersections. There is a multi-purpose trail present on the southside of theroadway. The posted speed limit is 45-mphwithin the study area. th 20 Avenue (CR 54) ‘ generally a two-lane undivided minor arterial roadway, which widens near Main Street (CR 14)to includea median andturn lanes. There is a multi- purpose trail present on the west side of the roadwaybetween Main Street and Fairview Street. The posted speed limit is 50-mphsouth of and 55-mph north of Main Street. Project BanjoTraffic Study ‘ Regional Analysis AddendumApril 22, 2022 Page 3 st 21 Avenue ‘ a local roadway that varies between a 2-lane undivided facility from Main Street to Commerce Drive and a 3-lane facility with a shared two-way left-turn lanesouth of Commerce Drive.The facility terminates approximately 900 feet south of Fairview Street. No multimodal facilities are present. The posted speed limit is 30-mph. Commerce Drive‘ a 3-lane local roadway with a shared two-way left-turn lane. No multimodal facilities are present. The posted speed limit is 30-mph. Fairview Street‘ a two-lane undivided local roadway which currently terminates about thst 800 feet east of 20 Avenue. This roadway is expected to be extended to 21Avenue in 2022. No multimodal facilities are present. The posted speed limit is 30-mph. Cedar Street ‘ a two-lane undivided local roadway which primarily serves residential land uses.No multimodal facilities are present. The posted speed limit is 30-mph. thst From a traffic control perspective, intersections along Main Streetat 20Avenue, 21Avenue, and the I-35E West and East Ramps are signalized.All other study intersections are unsignalized with side-street stop control. Existing geometrics, traffic controls, and traffic volumes in the study area are shown inFigure 2. Intersection Capacity Intersection capacity was evaluated using Synchro/SimTrafficSoftware (version 11), which incorporates methods outlined in the Highway Capacity Manual, 6th Edition. The software is used to develop calibrated models that simulate observed traffic operations and identify key metrics such as intersection Level of Service (LOS) and queues. These models incorporate collected traffic, pedestrian, and bicyclist volumes, traffic controls, and driver behavior factors. Level of Service (LOS) quantifies how an intersection is operating. Intersections are graded from LOS A through LOS F, which corresponds to the average delay per vehicle values shown inTable 1. An overall intersection LOS A though LOS D is generally considered acceptable in the Twin Cities. LOS A indicates the best traffic operation, while LOS F indicates an intersection where demand exceeds capacity. Table 1 Level of Service Thresholds Average Delay / Vehicles Level of Stop, Yield, and RoundaboutSignalized Service IntersectionsIntersections A < 10 seconds< 10 seconds B 10 to 15 seconds10 to 20 seconds C 15 to 25 seconds20 to 35 seconds D 25 to 35 seconds35 to 55 seconds E 35 to 50 seconds55 to 80 seconds F > 50 seconds> 80 seconds ) ) ) )))00 5 55 1 56 0 7 ( 2 3381 (((6(( \] \]\]\] \] \] : 0050 0 - 5 338 4 4 7 \[ \[\[\[ \[ 4 \[ 50 \[25\] (100) 505 0 5 0 3 59250 \[18 5\] (450) 6 \[85\] (215) 6110 1 545 \[245\] (315) 1 1 90 \[65\] (140 ) (755) 840 \[410\] 405 \[240\] (700) 325 \[200\] (535) 25) \[50\] (1 20 \[20\] (55) 55 )) ) ) 0\] (560 290 \[180\] (370)430 \[23 00 0 240 \[125\] (200) 6 8 7 (( 25 \[15\] (25) 1 ( \] \]\] 5 05 7 32 \[ \[\[ 0 55 2 12 1 225 \[190\] (585) 1 33-81 ) ) ) 5 5 )) 5 ( 6 0 0 1 ( ( ( 9 \] \] \] 1 5 5 ( 0 \[ 2 \] \]2 \[ \[ 0 5 ) \[20\] (75 50 \[ 5 9 55 \[ 6 \] (650) 380 \[245 5 5 5 5 \[5\] (5 ) (50) \[15\] 40 1 5 \[5 \] (10) 5) \[10\] (1 5 !411 ) 0\] (595) 470 \[28) ) 5 5 5 ( 2 (20) 20 \[10\] 7 ( ( \] \] \] ) ) 0 5 0 5 5 \[ 1 ( 2 5 \[ \[ 2 ( 0 55 \] \] 3 5 5 \[ 1 1 \[ 0 5 5 1 ) ) 5 5 ( ( \] \] 5 5 \[ \[ 5 5 1 0) 0 \[0\] ( 0 \[0\] (0) ) ) 0 0 ( 0 2 ( \] \] 0 0 \[ 95\] (10) 5 \[ \[ ) ) 0 (0) 0 \[0\] 0 0 0 6 3 1 ) 5 \[5\] (0 1 0 \[0\] (0) ( ( \] \] 0 \[0 \] (0) 5 0 \[ 1 \[ 5 0 ) ) 0 0 ( 6 2 ( \] \] 0 5 \[ 1 1 \[ ) ) 0 5 5 0 5( ( 1 \] \] !811 5 46F 0 \[ \[ 0 0 1 ) ) Future 5 0 90\] (0) 0 \[ 2 ( 1 ( 0) 0 \[0\] ( ) ) \] \] 0 0 55( 2 \[ 8 ( \[ \] \] 5 5 0 0 \[ 4 1 10\] (15) 20 \[ \[ 1 5 0 (10) 10 \[10\] Legend ) ) 5 0 1 YYY 1 BN!Qfbl!Ipvs!Wpmvnf 4 ( 2 6 ( \\YYY^ Njeebz!Qfbl!Ipvs!Wpmvnf \] \] 3 5 5 )YYY* -QN!Qfbl!Ipvs!Wpmvnf \[ 0 6 1 Y-YYY Ftujnbufe!BEU!Wpmvnf \[ 0 U 5 5 N 1 Existing Conditions Figure 2 Project BanjoTraffic Study ‘ Regional Analysis AddendumApril 22, 2022 Page 5 For side-street stop-controlled intersections, special emphasis is given to providing an estimate for the level of service of the side-street approach. Traffic operations at an unsignalized intersection with side- street stop control can be described in twoways. First, consideration is given to the overall intersection level of service, which takes into account the total number of vehicles entering the intersection and the capability of the intersection to support the volumes. Second, it is important to consider the delay on the minor approach. Since the mainline does not have to stop, most delay is attributed to the side-street approaches. It is typical of intersections with higher mainline traffic volumes to experience high-levels of delay (i.e., poor levels of service) on the side- street approaches, but an acceptable overall intersection level of service during peak hour conditions. The existing intersection capacity analysis shown in Table 2indicates that all study intersections currently operate at an overall LOS B or better during the a.m., midday (10 to 11 a.m.),and p.m. peak hours. In addition, side-streetapproachesand/or driveways operate at LOS D or better during the peak hours. Peak queues within the study area are well within the existing turn lane storages provided. Thus, no significant intersection capacity issues are present within the study area. Analysis results showing the average delays and queue lengths is available upon request. Table 2 Existing Intersection Capacity Level of Service (Delay) Traffic Intersection MiddayPeak Control AM Peak HourPM Peak Hour Hour th 20Avenue / Main StreetSIGNALB (16 sec)B (10 sec)B (18 sec) th 20Avenue / Commerce DriveSSSA / B (11 sec)A / B (10 sec)A / B (11 sec) th 20Avenue / Fairview StreetSSSA / A (1 sec)A / A (1 sec)A / A (1 sec) th 20Avenue / Cedar StreetSSSA / B (10 sec)A / B (10 sec)A / B (11 sec) st 21Avenue / Main StreetSIGNALA (6 sec)A (5 sec)A (8 sec) st 21Avenue / Commerce DriveSSSA / A (9 sec)A / A (9 sec)A / A (9 sec) st 21Avenue / Fairview StreetFUTURE Main Street / I-35E West RampSIGNALA (8 sec)A (7 sec)A (8 sec) Main Street / I-35E East RampSIGNALB (10 sec)A (8 sec)B (12 sec) AWSC ‘ All-Way-Stop-Control SSS ‘ Side-Street-Stop Note that the Main Street / I-35E interchange was reconstructed during 2010 and 2011 to increase intersection and roadway capacity in anticipation of and to accommodate future development in the area. The south approach at the West Ramp intersection was added as part of the project, but subsequently removed in 2013 to further improve operations and safety once full access at the Main stst Street / 21Avenue intersection wasprovided.The Main Street / 21Avenue intersection was st signalized in 2013. 21Avenue, south of Commerce Drive, was constructed in 2017. Project BanjoTraffic Study ‘ Regional Analysis AddendumApril 22, 2022 Page 6 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT The proposed development, shown in Figure 3, includes construction of a 141,000 square foot industrial building generally bounded by Commerce Drive to the north, Fairview Street to the south, thst 20Avenue (CR 54) to the west, and 21Avenue to the east. The proposed development is assumed to be fully constructed and operational by the end of 2023 or early 2024. The facility will provide a combination of warehouse, logistics, and distribution operations. The building will be a delivery facility that primarily serves the northeast Twin Cities metropolitan area. Given the operating and logistical characteristics of the user, peak activity of the site is expected to occur between 10 a.m. and 11 a.m., with limited activity during traditional a.m. and p.m. peak hours (i.e., 7:15 to 8:15 a.m. and 4:30 to 5:30 p.m.). The operations have a direct correlation to the sorting equipment inside the building and the number of van loadingspaces. Further information regarding trip generationand peak seasonal activityis provided later in this report. The developer anticipates a total headcount of approximately 543 employees on site throughout the course of the day during typical conditions. This headcount represents the total amount of employees in the building throughout the day, regardless of position or responsibility. The development is expected to operate in six shifts. The anticipated shift timesand employment structure is shown in Table 3. Employees will primarily run the inside operations of the building. Outsideof these core shifts, there might be a limited amount of other people inside the building doing small taskssuch as equipment maintenance or janitorial services. Table 3 Employment Shift Summary ShiftTimeEmployee Count st 1Shift2:00 AM ‘ 12:30 PM102 nd 2Shift6:00 AM ‘ 2:30 PM33 rd 3Shift1:30 PM ‘ 10:00 PM33 th 4Shift2:00 PM ‘ 6:00 PM26 th 5Shift12:00 PM ‘ 10:30 PM5 th 6Shift9:20 AM ‘ 9:00 PM344 st Access to the site will be provided via Fairview Street and 21Avenue. Two driveways are planned along Fairview Street, which will primarily serve the van parking area. Three driveways are located st along 21Avenue; the northern driveway will be a truck only access, the central access will be the employee access, and the south access will be the primary exit for delivery vans.Up to a total of 874 parking stalls are proposed for the site, of which 297 spaces are designated for associate parking and 577spacesforvan parking. Additional discussion regarding site access and parking is provided within the site plan review section of this study. Project BanjoTraffic Study ‘ Regional Analysis AddendumApril 22, 2022 Page 8 TRAFFIC FORECASTS Traffic forecasts were developed for year 2025 and 2040conditions, which represents one (1) year after openingas well as a long-term regional transportation assessment. Theforecasts include information regarding area roadway changes, assumed adjacent developments,general background growth, and trip generation from the proposed development. Forecasts were developed for both no build and build conditions, with the build condition including theProject Banjo development. Roadway Changes st Fairview Street is plannedto be extended to 21Avenue in 2022. Given the minimal activity along st 21Avenueand the redundant Commerce Drive connection, there is not expected to be a noticeable change in area travel patterns once Fairview Street is completed (assuming no other development). Localized rerouting of existing traffic was completed to reflect this new roadway connection. st 21Avenue is expected to be extended to connect with Cedar Streetby 2025. A preliminary review of th the existing traffic volumes at the 20Avenue and Cedar Street intersection, as well as the amount of residential development in the area, indicates that approximately 500vehicles per day from the thst adjacent residential neighborhood may divert away from 20Avenue to 21Avenue if this extension st were implemented. Traffic volumesassociated with the 21 Avenue extension were rerouted accordingly and incorporated into the future condition operations analyses. Adjacent Developments Based on discussions with project staff, severaladjacent developments were identified that have been approved or are expected to be constructedby year 2025. Remaining area developmentswere assumed to be fully developed by year 2040 conditions, therefore representing a full-build out conditionof thestudy area. The purpose of looking at these conditions is to help understand future infrastructure needs and timing to helpagencies plan for and implementappropriate improvements to support the area as it develops over time. A summary of the adjacent development and transportation network assumptions areillustrated in Figure 4, including the corresponding directional distribution for various land use types.Using these agreed upon assumptions, trip generationestimates were developed for both year 2025 and 2040 th conditions using the ITE Trip Generation Manual, 11Edition. A summary of the total adjacent development trip generation by year is provided inTable 4; detailed adjacent development trip generation estimates are provided in the Appendix. Note that these estimates do not include any multi-use, modal, or pass-by reductions to provide a conservative analysis. Table 4 Adjacent Development Trip Generation Summary Peak Hour Scenario * Condition AM MiddayPM Daily InOutInOutInOut 2025 Adjacent Development Trips 2152131451572392425,662 2040 Adjacent Development Trips 123851661312722694,978 AM - 7:15 to 8:15 a.m. Midday - 10 to 11 a.m. PM - 4:30 to 5:30 p.m. Project BanjoTraffic Study ‘ Regional Analysis AddendumApril 22, 2022 Page 10 Background Growth To account for general background growth in the study area, an annual growth rate of 1.5percent was applied to the existing traffic volumes to develop year 2025 and 2040background traffic forecasts. This growth rate is based on a combination of historical average daily traffic (ADT) volumes published by MnDOTand traffic forecasts identified within the Anoka County Transportation Plan, Lino Lakes Comprehensive Plan, and the 2020 I-35E Corridor AUARUpdate. This growth rate is lower than the annual three (3) percent growth rates within these plans, but was reduced given this study directly accounts for adjacent developments as noted earlier. Trip Generation Given the proposed land use, the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) does not have a sufficient amount of comparable data. Therefore, trip generation data for the proposed development provided by the project teamwas used. The data provided reflects the operational characteristics of the site, including employee vehicles, trucks, and van activity. As noted earlier,peak activity of the site is expected to occur between 10 a.m. and 11 a.m., with limited activity during traditional a.m. and p.m. peak hours which are 7:15 to 8:15 a.m. and 4:30 to 5:30 p.m., respectively. Table 5 provides a summary of the existinga.m., midday (i.e., facility), and p.m. peak hour trip generation for the site, in addition to daily activity. The proposed developmentis expected to generate 10 a.m. peak hour trips, 430 midday peak hour trips, 120 p.m. peak hourtrips, and 1,935 daily trips. A detailed breakdown of the expected trip generation by time of day and vehicle typeis provided in the Appendix. Table 4 also provides atrip generation estimate during the seasonal peak of the proposed development, which generally occurs in November and December. It is important to notethat there are logistical capacity constraints within the development which limits the trip generationpotential of the facility. Thus,the peak trip generation of the facility, which occurs during the midday peak hour, does not increase during the seasonal peak. However, the seasonal peak trip generation spreads into other hours of the day, which is reflected in the increase in trip generation during the a.m. and p.m. peak hours of the adjacent roadways. Table 5 Trip Generation Summary Peak Hour Scenario Vehicle Land Use AM MiddayPM Daily Type InOutInOutInOut Vehicles4 4 2090 59591,200 141,000 SF Warehouse / Trucks1 1 1 1 1 1 45 Logistics Hub Vans0 0 0 2190 0 690 Total Site Trips 5 5 21022060601,935 Vehicles530 1890 1821171,955 141,000 SF Warehouse / Trucks2 2 1 1 3 3 100 Logistics Hub Vans0 1480 219550 930 Total Peak Seasonal Site Trips 551501902202401202,985 Project BanjoTraffic Study ‘ Regional Analysis AddendumApril 22, 2022 Page 11 Trip Distribution Trips generated were distributed throughout the study area based on the directional distribution shown inFigure 5, which was developed based on existing travel patterns, service area data provided the project team,and engineering judgement. The trip distribution also shows the site generated trips at each of the driveways serving the siteduring typical weekday conditions. The resulting year2025 and year 2040 no build and build condition traffic volumes, including the peak season,are shown inFigure 6throughFigure 11. Note that the no build conditions include trips generated from the assumed adjacent developments, as well as the background growth rate applied to existing traffic volumes routed for the future transportation connections noted. The build conditions represent the no build conditions, with the proposed development traffic added. FUTURE INTERSECTION CAPACITY ANALYSIS To understand how intersection capacity is expected to change as the area develops,including the proposed development, a detailed intersection capacity analysis was conducted for each of the traffic forecasts scenarios. This analysis again leveraged Synchro/SimTrafficSoftware (version 11). Results of the future intersection capacity analysis are summarized in Table 6by time period and scenario. Detailed informationshowing the average delays and queue length for each scenario are available upon request. The capacity analysisindicated that the study intersections can support the assumed adjacentand proposed developments under both year 2025 and 2040 conditions, including the peak season. With optimized signal timing(i.e., cycle lengths, phasing, and splits), all study intersections and movements are expected to operate at LOS D or better during the a.m., midday, and p.m. peak hours. However, st the primary area of concern is the Main Street and 21 Avenue intersection, where the following queuing issues were identified: st Northbound queuesalong 21Avenue from Main Streetareexpected to regularly extend beyond the north Gas Station drivewaylocatedabout 90 feet from Main Streetunder year 2025 build conditions; these queues lengthen under each successive traffic forecast scenario st Southbound left-turn queuesalong 21Avenue from Main Street are expected to extend between300 and 335feet starting under year 2040no build p.m. peak hour conditions; these queues extend beyond the Bank access approximately 250 feet to the north st A detailed summary of the Main Street and 21 Avenue intersection capacity analysis and pertinent queues by scenario is provided in Table 7. Detailed analysis resultsfor each scenario are available upon request. Potential infrastructure considerations to address theintersection capacity/queuingissues noted, as well as other long-term considerations are noted in the following section. It is important to note that the I-35E / Main Streetinterchange reconstruction completed in 2011, and subsequent Main Street / st 21Avenue intersection projects in 2013and 2014 added significant capacity within the area in anticipation of future development within the area. )) 57 15 4,750 (37)(38)(94) 11 (( \] \] 4 3 \[31\]\[55\]\[106\] 8 6 \[ \[ 62\[32\](116) 1 115\[89\](225) 7 3755106 290\[213\](491) 06 570 \[256\] (329)905\[449\](823) 205\[137\](358) 11 115\[76\] (142) 540 \[330\] (852) 4 01 \[252\] (6 28) 21\[21\](58) 89\[74\](166) 322\[207\](418) 480\[262\](620) 329 \[192\] (304) 34\[19\](28) (73)(86)(186) \[33\]\[27\]\[78\] 1828118 235 \[199\] (612) 26,250 15,25021,750 (69)(5)(169) (196)(2) 6,300 \[62\]\[5\]\[101\] 3,750 138\[90\] (206) \[105\]\[6\] 675184 392\[246\](654) 111\[57\](107) 7\[6\](11) 1927 6\[6\](7) 49\[46\](85) 350 465\[277\](601) 22\[13\](22) (27)(5)(162) \[13\]\[5\]\[66\] (281)(6) 8581 \[122\]\[7\] 1525 (5)(47)(7) \[5\]\[32\]\[9\] 5\[7\](19) 54221 3\[2\](6) 0\[1\](1) (203)(0) 175 \[105\]\[1\] 5\[5\](10) 2\[3\](3) 1899 5\[5\](0) 0\[1\](6) (10)(30) 1\[5\](6) \[0\]\[46\] 800 046 (281)(1) \[123\]\[0\](8)(45) 1571 \[8\]\[24\] 475 35E 729 (218)(6) 2\[3\](7) (2)(33)(0) 8\[0\](0) (5)(59) \[103\]\[7\] \[2\]\[16\]\[0\] 0\[0\](0) 1745 280 \[0\]\[38\] 0 7\[6\](6)\[0\](0) 12\[12\](12)0\[0\](0) 049 7\[1\](1) 0\[0\](0) Legend 10\[12\](22) XXX (17)(26)(0)AM Peak Hour Volume (271)(17) \[XXX\] Midday Peak Hour Volume (XXX) PM Peak Hour Volume \[17\]\[21\]\[0\] \[116\]\[6\] T 18340 6,100 16612 N 2025 No Build Figure 6 )) 47 25 4,850 (37)(41)(97) 11 (( \] \] 4 4 \[31\]\[37\]\[58\] 8 9 \[ \[ 62\[37\](119) 2 115\[89\](225) 7 3755106 291\[224\](494) 06 570 \[256\] (329)905\[470\](828) 207\[242\](387) 11 115\[76\] (142) 542 \[456\] (886) 4 02 \[307\] (6 42) 21\[21\](58) 90\[107\](175) 323\[218\](421) 480\[284\](625) 331 \[302\] (333) 34\[29\](31) (76)(89)(186) \[44\]\[33\]\[78\] 1828118 235 \[199\] (612) 26,450 15,45023,200 (69)(5)(169) (196)(8) 6,450 \[62\]\[5\]\[101\] 5,350 138\[90\] (206) \[107\]\[19\] 675184 392\[246\](654) 114\[214\](150) 7\[14\](17) 1927 6\[6\](7) 49\[46\](85) 500 465\[277\](601) 23\[30\](28) (33)(5)(205) \[29\]\[5\]\[231\] (281)(6) 9584 \[131\]\[7\] 1525 (5)(96)(7) \[5\]\[206\]\[9\] 5\[7\](19) 54621 3\[2\](6) 0\[1\](1) (203)(0) 275 \[105\]\[3\] 5\[5\](10) 2\[3\](3) 1899 5\[18\](6) 0\[10\](6) (13)(122) 2\[27\](12) \[8\]\[227\] 900 050 (281)(7) \[123\]\[21\](14)(45) 1572 \[11\]\[24\] 575 35E 829 (224)(6) 3\[23\](13) (2)(33)(0) 8\[0\](0) (5)(59) \[125\]\[7\] \[3\]\[19\]\[0\] 0\[0\](0) 1755 280 \[0\]\[38\] 0 7\[6\](6)\[0\](0) 12\[12\](12)0\[0\](0) 049 7\[1\](1) 0\[0\](0) Legend 10\[12\](22) XXX (17)(26)(0)AM Peak Hour Volume (277)(17) \[XXX\] Midday Peak Hour Volume (XXX) PM Peak Hour Volume \[17\]\[21\]\[0\] \[137\]\[6\] T 18340 6,300 16712 N 2025 Build Figure 7 )) 17 55 4,900 (37)(44)(100) 11 (( \] \] 4 1 \[31\]\[38\]\[56\] 8 9 \[ \[ 67\[38\](119) 1 115\[89\](225) 7 3758106 300\[226\](496) 06 570 \[256\] (329)910\[468\](847) 232\[232\](478) 11 115\[76\] (142) 572 \[444\] (996) 4 39 \[307\] (6 58) 21\[21\](58) 111\[107\](184) 325\[217\](430) 496\[284\](632) 404 \[302\] (367) 37\[28\](40) (80)(89)(186) \[42\]\[32\]\[78\] 2330118 235 \[199\] (612) 26,550 15,55024,000 (69)(5)(169) (205)(11) 6,525 \[62\]\[5\]\[101\] 6,225 138\[90\] (206) \[110\]\[16\] 675184 392\[246\](654) 151\[199\](287) 14\[15\](15) 19510 6\[6\](7) 49\[46\](85) 575 465\[277\](601) 25\[27\](40) (35)(5)(255) \[32\]\[5\]\[231\] (287)(6) 235194 \[127\]\[7\] 1525 (5)(245)(7) \[5\]\[188\]\[9\] 5\[7\](19) 58521 3\[2\](6) 0\[1\](1) (203)(9) 325 \[105\]\[6\] 5\[5\](10) 2\[3\](3) 18912 5\[15\](9) 0\[6\](12) (11)(174) 16\[22\](14) \[9\]\[230\] 950 7174 (281)(17) \[123\]\[7\](70)(49) 1575 \[33\]\[29\] 625 35E 1629 (226)(6) 4\[3\](7) (6)(33)(0) 8\[0\](0) (5)(67) \[120\]\[6\] \[7\]\[16\]\[0\] 0\[0\](0) 1895 280 \[0\]\[50\] 0 7\[6\](6)\[0\](0) 12\[17\](16)0\[0\](0) 051 9\[13\](9) 0\[0\](0) Legend 10\[12\](22) XXX (17)(26)(0)AM Peak Hour Volume (287)(25) \[XXX\] Midday Peak Hour Volume (XXX) PM Peak Hour Volume \[17\]\[21\]\[0\] \[123\]\[18\] T 18340 6,400 17014 N 2025 Build Peak Season Figure 8 ) ) 6 8 9 7 1 1 6,200( (46)(47)(128) ( \] \]5 80 \[39\]\[40\]\[73\] 91 \[\[ 81\[45\](157) 7 144\[111\](281) 9 4668137 367\[282\](648) 30 713 \[320\] (412)1144\[581\](1064) 276\[215\](517) 12 147\[109\] (210) 707 \[476\] (1169) 5 11 \[346\] (8 48) 26\[26\](72) 116\[108\](238) 415\[278\](556) 604\[343\](806) 422 \[276\] (450) 42\[23\](35) (90)(107)(263) \[41\]\[34\]\[116\] 2235159 235 \[248\] (765) 33,300 19,50030,400 (163)(7)(352) (277)(2) 8,400 \[110\]\[7\]\[188\] 5,000 219\[197\] (391) \[145\]\[8\] 947246 490\[307\](817) 135\[70\](139) 9\[8\](13) 2439 8\[8\](9) 88\[103\](177) 450 582\[346\](752) 29\[18\](31) (35)(7)(195) \[18\]\[7\]\[80\] (382)(8) 128105 \[171\]\[9\] 2007 (7)(47)(7) \[7\]\[37\]\[9\] 5\[7\](19) 74821 3\[2\](6) 0\[1\](1) (285)(0) 250 \[145\]\[1\] 7\[7\](13) 2\[3\](3) 24011 7\[7\](0) 0\[1\](8) (9)(88) 1\[7\](8) \[0\]\[56\] 1,050 057 (382)(1) \[172\]\[0\](10)(55) 2071 \[10\]\[28\] 625 35E 734 (305)(8) 2\[3\](7) (4)(40)(0) 10\[0\](0) (7)(71) \[143\]\[9\] \[3\]\[19\]\[0\] 0\[0\](0) 2217 4100 \[0\]\[47\] 0 9\[8\](8)\[0\](0) 17\[16\](17)0\[0\](0) 060 10\[3\](4) 0\[0\](0) Legend 13\[15\](27) XXX (21)(31)(0)AM Peak Hour Volume (369)(24) \[XXX\] Midday Peak Hour Volume (XXX) PM Peak Hour Volume \[21\]\[25\]\[0\] \[164\]\[10\] T 22410 8,100 21917 N 2040 No Build Figure 9 ) ) 6 7 9 8 1 1 6,300( (46)(50)(131) ( \] \] 5 9 0 2 \[39\]\[45\]\[79\] 1 1 \[ \[ 81\[50\](160) 8 144\[111\](281) 9 4668137 368\[293\](651) 30 713 \[320\] (412)1,144\[602\](1,069) 278\[320\](546) 12 147\[109\] (210) 709 \[602\] (1,203) 5 12 \[401\] (8 62) 26\[26\](72) 117\[141\](247) 416\[289\](559) 604\[365\](811) 424 \[377\] (479) 42\[33\](38) (93)(110)(263) \[52\]\[40\]\[116\] 2235159 235 \[248\] (765) 33,500 19,70031,850 (163)(7)(352) (277)(8) 8,550 \[110\]\[7\]\[188\] 6,600 219\[197\] (391) \[147\]\[21\] 947246 490\[307\](817) 138\[227\](182) 9\[16\](19) 2439 8\[8\](9) 88\[103\](177) 600 582\[346\](752) 30\[35\](37) (41)(7)(238) \[34\]\[7\]\[245\] (382)(8) 138108 \[180\]\[9\] 2007 (7)(106)(7) \[7\]\[211\]\[9\] 5\[7\](19) 75221 3\[2\](6) 0\[1\](1) (285)(0) 350 \[145\]\[0\] 7\[7\](13) 2\[3\](3) 24011 7\[20\](6) 0\[10\](8) (15)(137) 2\[29\](14) \[0\]\[237\] 1,150 061 (382)(7) \[172\]\[21\](16)(55) 2072 \[13\]\[28\] 725 35E 834 (311)(8) 3\[23\](13) (4)(40)(0) 10\[0\](0) (7)(71) \[165\]\[9\] \[3\]\[19\]\[0\] 0\[0\](0) 2227 4100 \[0\]\[47\] 0 9\[8\](8)\[0\](0) 17\[16\](17)0\[0\](0) 060 10\[3\](4) 0\[0\](0) Legend 13\[15\](27) XXX (21)(31)(0)AM Peak Hour Volume (375)(24) \[XXX\] Midday Peak Hour Volume (XXX) PM Peak Hour Volume \[21\]\[25\]\[0\] \[185\]\[10\] T 22410 8,300 22017 N 2040 Build Figure 10 ) ) 4 6 1 9 2 6,350 (46)(53)(134) 1 ( ( \]\] 65 20 \[39\]\[46\]\[77\] 11 \[\[ 86\[51\](160) 5 144\[111\](281) 9 4671137 377\[295\](653) 40 713 \[320\] (412)1,149\[600\](1,088) 303\[310\](637) 12 147\[109\] (210) 739 \[590\] (1,313) 5 49 \[401\] (8 78) 26\[26\](72) 138\[141\](256) 418\[288\](568) 620\[365\](818) 497 \[377\] (513) 45\[32\](47) (97)(110)(263) \[50\]\[39\]\[116\] 2737159 294 \[248\] (765) 33,600 19,80032,650 (163)(7)(352) (286)(11) 8,625 \[110\]\[7\]\[188\] 7,475 219\[197\] (391) \[150\]\[18\] 947246 490\[307\](817) 175\[212\](319) 16\[17\](17) 24612 8\[8\](9) 88\[103\](177) 725 582\[346\](752) 32\[32\](49) (43)(7)(288) \[37\]\[7\]\[245\] (388)(8) 278218 \[176\]\[9\] 2007 (7)(255)(7) \[7\]\[193\]\[9\] 5\[7\](19) 49121 3\[2\](6) 0\[1\](1) (285)(9) 400 \[145\]\[6\] 7\[7\](13) 2\[3\](3) 24014 10\[17\](9) 0\[6\](14) (13)(189) 16\[24\](16) \[9\]\[240\] 1,200 7185 (382)(17) \[172\]\[7\](72)(59) 2075 \[35\]\[33\] 75 35E 1634 (313)(8) 4\[3\](7) (8)(40)(0) 10\[0\](0) (7)(79) \[160\]\[9\] \[8\]\[19\]\[0\] 0\[0\](0) 2367 4100 \[0\]\[59\] 0 9\[8\](8)\[0\](0) 17\[21\](21)0\[0\](0) 062 12\[15\](12) 0\[0\](0) Legend 13\[15\](27) XXX (21)(31)(0)AM Peak Hour Volume (385)(32) \[XXX\] Midday Peak Hour Volume (XXX) PM Peak Hour Volume \[21\]\[25\]\[0\] \[171\]\[22\] T 22410 8,400 22319 N 2040 Build Peak Season Figure 11 Table 6 Intersection Capacity Analysis Summary AM Peak Hour Intersection Capacity Level of Service (Delay) Traffic Intersection 2025 Build - 2040 Build - Control Existing2025 No Build2025 Build2040 No Build2040 Build Peak SeasonPeak Season th SIGNALB (16)B (17)B (17)B (17)B (18)B (18)B (19) 20 Avenue / Main Street th SSSA / B (11)A / B (10)A / B (10)A / B (10)A / B (11)A / B (11)A / B (11) 20 Avenue / Commerce Drive th SSSA / A (1)A / B (11)A / B (11)A / B (12)A / B (12)A / B (12)A / B (13) 20 Avenue / Fairview Street th SSSA / B (10)A / B (11)A / B (11)A / B (11)A / B (12)A / B (12)A / B (12) 20 Avenue / Cedar Street st SIGNALA (6)B (10)B (10)B (12)B (13)B (13)B (15) 21 Avenue / Main Street st SSSA / A (9)A / A (9)A / B (10)A / B (10)A / B (10)A / B (10)A / B (11) 21 Avenue / Northern Lights Blvd st SSSA / A (9)A / B (10)A / B (10)A / B (11)A / B (10)A / B (10)A / B (11) 21 Avenue / Commerce Drive st SSSA / B (10)A / B (12)A / B (11)A / B (12) 21 Avenue / North Access st SSSA / A (9)A / A (1)A / A (9)A / A (1) 21 Avenue / Central Access st SSSA / A (1)A / B (10)A / A (1)A / B (10) 21 Avenue / South Access st SSSA / A (9)A / A (9)A / A (9)A / A (9)A / A (9)A / A (9) Avenue / Fairview Street 21 st SSSA / A (9)A / A (9)A / A (9)A / A (9)A / A (9)A / A (9) 21 Avenue / South Industrial Access st SSSA / B (10)A / B (10)A / B (10)A / B (10)A / B (10)A / B (10) 21 Avenue / Cedar Street Main Street / I-35E West RampSIGNALA (8)A (8)A (9)A (8)A (9)A (9)A (9) Main Street / I-35E East RampSIGNALB (10)B ( 10)A (9)A (8)B (10)B (10)B (11) Fairview Steet / West Site AccessSSSA / A (1)A / A (2)A / A (1)A / A (2) A (9)A / A (9)A / A (8)A / A (9)A / A (9) Fairview Steet / East Site Access / SuttonSSSA / A (8)A / Midday (10 to 11 AM) Peak Hour Intersection Capacity Level of Service (Delay) Traffic Intersection 2025 Build - 2040 Build - Control Existing2025 No Build2025 Build2040 No Build2040 Build Peak SeasonPeak Season th SIGNALB (10)B (10)B (11)B (11)B (11)B (12)B (12) 20 Avenue / Main Street th SSSA / B (10)A / B (10)A / B (10)A / B (10)A / B (10)A / B (10)A / B (10) 20 Avenue / Commerce Drive th SSSA / A (1)A / B (10)A / B (10)A / B (10)A / B (11)A / B (11)A / B (11) Avenue / Fairview Street 20 th SSSA / B (10)A / B (10)A / B (10)A / B (10)A / B (11)A / B (11)A / B (11) 20 Avenue / Cedar Street st SIGNALA (5)A (8)B (10)B (10)B (11)B (13)B (13) Avenue / Main Street 21 st SSSA / A (9)A / A (9)A / B (11)A / B (11)A / A (9)A / B (11)A / B (11) 21 Avenue / Northern Lights Blvd st SSSA / A (9)A / B (10)A / B (11)A / B (11)A / A (9)A / B (11)A / B (11) Avenue / Commerce Drive 21 st SSSA / B (12)A / B (12)A / C (15)A / C (15) 21 Avenue / North Access st SSSA / B (11)A / B (11)A / B (11)A / B (11) Avenue / Central Access 21 st SSSA / B (11)A / B (11)A / B (11)A / B (11) 21 Avenue / South Access st SSSA / A (9)A / A (9)A / A (9)A / A (9)A / A (9)A / A (9) Avenue / Fairview Street 21 st SSSA / A (9)A / A (9)A / A (9)A / A (9)A / A (9)A / A (9) 21 Avenue / South Industrial Access st SSSA / B (10)A / B (10)A / B (10)A / B (10)A / B (10)A / B (10) 21 Avenue / Cedar Street Main Street / I-35E West RampSIGNALA (7)A (7)A (7)A (7)A (7)A (7)A (7) Main Street / I-35E East RampSIGNALA (8)A8)A (8)A (8)B (8)B (8)B (8) ( Fairview Steet / West Site AccessSSSA / A (9)A / A (9)A / A (9)A / A (9) Fairview Steet / East Site Access / SuttonSSSA / A (9)A / A (9)A / A (9)A / A (9)A / A (9)A / A (9) PM Peak Hour Intersection Capacity Level of Service (Delay) Traffic Intersection 2025 Build - 2040 Build - Control 2040 No Build2040 Build Existing2025 No Build2025 Build Peak SeasonPeak Season th SIGNALB (18)B (19)B (19)C (20)C (20)C (20)C (21) 20 Avenue / Main Street th SSSA / B (11)A / B (11)A / B (11)A / B (11)A / B (13)A / B (12)A / B (13) 20 Avenue / Commerce Drive th SSSA / A (1)A / B (12)A / B (12)A / B (12)A / B (13)A / B (14)A / B (14) 20 Avenue / Fairview Street th SSSA / B (11)A / B (12)A / B (12)A / B (13)A / B (14)A / B (14)A / C (15) 20 Avenue / Cedar Street st SIGNALA (8)B (15)B (15)C (20)C (22)C (23)C (27) 21 Avenue / Main Street st SSSA / B (10)A / B (10)A / B (10)A / B (11)A / B (10)A / B (10)A / B (11) 21 Avenue / Northern Lights Blvd st SSSA / A (9)A / B (10)A / B (11)A / B (12)A / B (10)A / B (11)A / B (13) 21 Avenue / Commerce Drive st SSSA / B (12)A / B (14)A / B (12)A / C (15) 21 Avenue / North Access st SSSA / B (10)A / A (1)A / B (10)A / A (1) 21 Avenue / Central Access st SSSA / A (1)A / B (11)A / A (1)A / B (11) 21 Avenue / South Access st SSSA / B (10)A / B (10)A / B (10)A / B (10)A / B (10)A / B (10) 21 Avenue / Fairview Street st SSSA / A (9)A / A (9)A / A (9)A / A (9)A / A (9)A / A (9) 21 Avenue / South Industrial Access st SSSA / B (10)A / B (10)A / B (10)A / B (10)A / B (10)A / B (10) 21 Avenue / Cedar Street Main Street / I-35E West RampSIGNALA (8)A (8)A (8)B (10)A (9)B (11)B (12) Main Street / I-35E East RampSIGNALB (12)B (11)B (11)B (12)B (14)B (17)B (17) Fairview Steet / West Site AccessSSSA / A (1)A / A (4)A / A (1)A / A (4) Fairview Steet / East Site Access / SuttonSSSA / A (9)A / A (9)A / A (9)A / A (9)A / A (9)A / A (9) 170 feet210 feet185 feet175 feet 100 feet115 feet105 feet110 feet125 feet335 feet130 feet320 feet170 feet305 feet130 feet320 feet PM Peak Hour AM Peak Hour Midday Peak Hour WB LTNB RTSB LT 35 feet45 feet85 feet80 feet65 feet185 feet75 feet60 feet210 feet25 feet45 feet50 feet40 feet50 feet110 feet50 feet65 feet160 feet60 feet50 feet50 feet60 feet50 feet50 feet90 feet55 feet95 feet 390 feet90 feet300 feet**100 feet110 feet65 feet215 feet105 feet70 feet235 feet155 feet125 feet90 feet115 feet125 feet90 feet115 feet155 feet90 feet190 feet170 feet250 feet155 feet200 feet325 feet190 feet 95% Queuing Summary (Key Movements) Red indicates queues that extend beyond the available turn lane storage or impact an adjacent driveway. Storage A (8) Level of Service (Delay) A (5)B (12)C (33)B (11)A (7)B (10)C (22)B (10) A (5)B (12)C (30)B (10)A (4)B (12)C (23)A (8)A (7)B (10)C (22)B (10) EBWBNBSBOverall A (5)A (6)A (5)A (7)A (7) B (19)C (22)B (17)C (33)C (22) B (10)A (8)B (12)C (26)B (12)B (10)B (10)B (13)C (25)B (13)B (10)B (10)B (14)C (25)B (13)B (12)B (13)B (14)C (25)B (15)B (10)A (6)B (14)C (20)B (11)B (13)A (8)B (12)C (23)B (13)B (13)A (8)B (12)C (23)B (13)B (12)B (12)B (14)C (32)B (14)B (13)B (14)B (14)C (30)B (15) C (21)B (19)B (14)C (29)C (20)C (21)C (23)B (17)C (32)C (23)C (28)C (28)C (20)C (29)C (27) ue Intersection Capacity Summary Table 7 Main Street / 21st Aven ScenarioAM Peak Hour ExistingA (4)A (2)B (14)D (38)A (6)2025 No Build2025 Build2025 Build - Peak Season2040 No Build2040 Build2040 Build - Peak Season Midday Peak Hour ExistingA (3)A (2)B (18)C (24)A (5)2025 No Build2025 Build2025 Build - Peak Season *2040 No Build2040 Build2040 Build - Peak Season *PM Peak Hour ExistingA (6)A (6)B (14)D (35)2025 No Build2025 Build2025 Build - Peak Season2040 No Build2040 Build2040 Build - Peak Season2040 Build - Peak Season (Sensitiviy Routing)C (21)C (27)B (19)C (31)C (25)* Same as midday build due to limited internal logistic capacity to increase vehicle output.** Represents effective storage, there is an existing bank access approximately 225 feet north of Main Street Project BanjoTraffic Study ‘ Regional Analysis AddendumApril 22, 2022 Page 21 POTENTIALINFRASTRUCTURE CONSIDERATIONS Based on the future intersection capacity analysis and corresponding queues, as well as good transportation planning practices, the following potential considerationswere identified. These items are not needed from a capacity perspective, but could help improve safety, reduce conflicts/queues, and/or overall site efficiency. This information was shared during a coordination meeting with project th representatives (i.e., Lino Lakes, Centerville, Anoka County, and MnDOT) on April 7. 1)Near Term: Signal Timing Optimization ‘ the project team and agencies should coordinate with Anoka County and MnDOT to review the analysis and study findings anddevelop optimized signal timing plans for future conditions; includes modifications to cyclelengths, phasing, and splits. 2)Near Term: Site Plan Improvements ‘ A preliminary review of the proposed site plan does not indicate any major issues. However, the following items should be considered: a.Locate signage and landscaping to avoid creating any sight distance issues. st b.Convert the South Access along 21Avenue to exit onlyto help reduce potential internal van st conflicts, while also reducing potential conflicts along 21Avenue with the adjacent Distribution Alternative, Inc. driveway. c.Coordinate with City staff to identify any multimodal (i.e., sidewalk or trail) improvements along st Fairview Street or 21 Avenue adjacent to the site. st 3)Potential: Main Street/ 21Avenue (South Approach) ‘ with the projected increase in traffic along stst 21Avenue, the addition of a median along 21Avenue from Main Street to about150 feet to the south should be considered. This would restrict the Mobil Gas Station and ADL Auto Repair & Service driveways to right-in/right-out, but also help reduce potential conflicts and queues from impacting Main Street and would generally improve traffic flowin this area.Other potential design features, such as an extended right-turnturn lane and additional southbound width to accommodate future lanes could also be considered (example configuration shown in Figure 12). st 4)Potential: On-Street Parking ‘ no on-street parking is expected to be needed along 21Avenue or Fairview Street, although corresponding Žno-parking signage could be added for reinforcement. In addition to the near-term considerationsassociated withthe proposed development, long-term regional planning infrastructure needswerealsoidentified to support future assumed development within the study. The following improvements areoffered for considerationand planning purposes. st 5)Long-Term: Main Street / 21 Avenue (North Approach) ‘ continue to monitor operations and queuingas additional development occurs; potential improvements to minimize southbound left- turn queuing impacts that would require additional analysis beyond the scope of this study include: a.Signal timing ad justments b.Convert the thru lane to a left-turn lane (to provide dual lefts) and convert the right-turn lane to a shared right/thru lane or add a dedicated right-turn lane c.Convert the thru lane to a shared left/thrulane and implement split signal timing st 6)Long-Term: 21Avenue (Main Street to Commerce Drive) ‘ this segment is currently a 2-lane undivided roadway, while the segment south of Commerce Drive is a 3-lane facility.The segment between Main Street and Commerce Drive could be upgraded to a 3-lane facility to provide continuityand additional capacity to support remaining development opportunities in the area. Access management strategies could be included as opportunities arise as illustrated in Figure 12. Project BanjoTraffic Study ‘ Regional Analysis AddendumApril 22, 2022 Page 23 th 7)Long-Term: Southbound Left-Turn Lanesalong 20 Avenue ‘ the capacity analysis does not th indicate a need for southbound left-turn lanes along 20Avenue at Commerce Drive or Fairview st Steet since mostsite generated trips will use 21 Avenue to access I-35E. However, coordination with Anoka County should occur to review the analysis and study findingsand determine if these turn lanes should be incorporated from a safetyand reduced conflict perspective. TH 20AVENUE TURN LANE SENSITIVITY TEST Based on discussion with project representatives, there were concerns withbusiness impacts st associated with potential infrastructure and access changes along 21 Avenue south of Main Street; queuingand turn lane storagewere also noted as a concern. Although the capacity analysis did not indicate any major issues, an additional sensitivity test was conducted to understand how changes in development routing could impact infrastructure needs. Since the proposed development has a significant amount of control over their employee and van routing, thissensitivity testwas conducted th assuming proposed development related traffic was geo-coded/routed via 20Avenue to access the st site, as opposed to 21Avenue. The analysis focused on the 2040 Build Peak Season during the p.m. peak hour, which represents the highest traffic volume scenario evaluated. thst The change in routingshifts approximately 300 p.m. peak hour vehicles to 20 Avenue from 21 Avenue (i.e., 200 inbound and 100 outbound), via Main Street. This shift also adds about100 th southbound left-turning vehicles along 20 Avenue at Commerce Drive and Fairview Streets, respectively(assuming both Commerce Drive and Fairview Streets were allowed to be usedunder a geo-coded scenario). Although the capacity analysis shown in Table 8doesnot indicate any capacity issues from a level of services perspective, introducing 100-plus peak hour left-turning movements th would warrant constructing southbound left-turn lanes along 20Avenue at both Commerce Drive and Fairview Street(depending on the geo-coded routing desired). The specific configurationwould need to be further evaluated and include other considerations(i.e., road realignmentsand pedcrossings). Table 8 2040Build Peak Season Sensitivity Test 2040 Build Peak Season - PM Peak Hour Traffic Level of Service (Delay) Intersection Control Original RoutingGeo-Coded Routing th 20Avenue / Main StreetSIGNALC (21sec)C (25sec) th 20Avenue / Commerce DriveSSSA / B (13 sec)A / B (14 sec) th 20Avenue / Fairview StreetSSSA / B (14 sec)A / C (15 sec) st 21Avenue / Main StreetSIGNALC (27sec)C (25 sec) st 21Avenue / Commerce DriveSSSA / B (13 sec)A / B (10 sec) st Notethat the queueing issues at the 21Avenue / Main Street intersection are expected to continue, regardless of theproposed development traffic rerouting (see Table 7sensitivity test). The queues are reduced from the 2040 Build ‘ Peak Season analysis butare still expected to extend beyond the th gas station access as previously noted. The westbound left-turn lane at the 20Avenue/ Main Street intersection can accommodate the shift in volumes, but once again, the signal timing would need to be optimized. Therefore, based on this sensitivity test, the geo-controlling of employees and/or vans of the proposed development is a tool that could be leveraged to help mitigate issues, but is not considered a requirement to ensure safe and efficient transportation conditions in the area. Project BanjoTraffic Study ‘ Regional Analysis AddendumApril 22, 2022 Page 24 SUMMARY The following study conclusions and recommendationsare offered for consideration. 1)All study intersections currently operate at an overall LOS B or better during the a.m., midday (10 to 11 a.m.), and p.m. peak hours. 2)Traffic forecasts were developed foryear 2025 and 2040 no build and buildconditions, including peak seasonal conditions. These forecasts represent one (1) year after opening as well as a long- term regional transportation assessment.These forecasts include: st a.Existing travel pattern shifts associated with the Fairview Street connection to 21 Avenue and st the 21Avenue connection to Cedar Street. b.Adjacent developments thathave been approved or are expected to be constructedby year 2025and 2040, respectively. c.An annual growth rate of oneand a half (1.5) percent applied to the existing peak hour and daily traffic volumes to develop year 2024 background forecasts. d.The proposed development is expected to generate 10 a.m. peak hour trips, 430 midday peak hour trips, 120 p.m. peak hour trips, and 1,935 daily tripsduring typical weekday conditions. Under seasonal peak conditions, the development is expected to generate 205a.m. peak hour trips, 410midday peak hour trips, 360p.m. peak hour trips, and 2,985 daily trips 3)The capacity analysis indicated that the study intersections can support the assumed adjacent and proposed developments under both year 2025 and 2040 conditions, including the peak season. With optimized signaltiming (i.e., cycle lengths, phasing, and splits), all study intersections and movements are expected to operate at LOS D or better during the a.m., midday, and st p.m. peak hours.However, the primary area of concern is the Main Street and 21Avenue intersection, where the following queuing issues were identified: st a.Northbound queuesalong 21Avenue from Main Streetareexpected to regularly extend beyond the north Gas Station drivewaylocated about 90 feet from Main Streetunder year 2025 build conditions; these queues lengthen under each successive traffic forecast scenario. st b.Southbound left-turn queuesalong 21Avenue from Main Street are expected to extend between300 and 335feet starting under year 2040no build p.m. peak hour conditions; these queues extend beyond the Bank access approximately 250 feet to the north. 4)Based on the future intersection capacity analysis and corresponding queues, as well as good transportation planning practices, the following potential considerationswere identified. a.Near Term: Signal Timing Optimization ‘ the project team and agencies should coordinate with Anoka County and MnDOT to develop optimized signal timing plans for future conditions. b.Near Term: Site Plan Improvements Locate signage and landscaping to avoid creating any sight distance issues. Project BanjoTraffic Study ‘ Regional Analysis AddendumApril 22, 2022 Page 25 st Convert the South Access along 21Avenue to exit onlyto help reduce potential internal st van conflicts, while also reducing potential conflicts along 21Avenue with the adjacent Distribution Alternative, Inc. driveway. Coordinate with City staff to identify any multimodal (i.e., sidewalk or trail) improvements st along Fairview Street or 21Avenue adjacent to the site. stst c.Potential: Main Street / 21Avenue (South Approach) ‘ add a median along 21Avenue from Main Street to about 150 feet to the southto restrict the Mobil Gas Station and ADL Auto Repair & Service driveways to right-in/right-outand help reduce conflicts and queues; other potential accommodations, such as an extended right-turn turn lane and additional southbound width to accommodate future lanes could also be considered. st d.Potential: On-Street Parking ‘ add Žno-parking signage on21Avenue and Fairview Street. st e.Long-Term: Main Street / 21Avenue (North Approach) ‘ continue to monitor operations and queuing as additional development occurs; consider future potential improvements to minimize southbound left-turn queuing impacts such as: Signal timing adjustments Convert the thru lane to a left-turn lane (to provide dual lefts) and convert the right-turn lane to a shared right/thru lane or add a dedicated right-turn lane Convert the thru lane to a shared left/thru lane and implement split signal timing st f.Long-Term: 21Avenue (Main Street to Commerce Drive) ‘ upgradethis segmentto a 3-lane facility to provide continuity and additional capacity to support remaining development. th g.Long-Term: Southbound Left-Turn Lanes along 20Avenue ‘ coordinate with Anoka County to determine if these turn lanes should be incorporated from a safety perspective. Under a geo-coded/routing condition, where proposed development traffic is routed via thst 20Avenue (as opposed to 21Avenue), constructing southbound left-turn lanes along th 20 Avenue at Commerce Drive and/orFairview Streetshould be considered, depending on the specific routing desired for the development. st 5)The queueing issues at the 21Avenue / Main Street intersection are expected to continue, regardless of the proposed development traffic rerouting; therefore, the geo-controlling of employees and/or vans of the proposed development is a tool that could be leveraged to help mitigate issues butis not considered a requirement to ensure safe and efficient transportation conditions in the area. APPENDIX Daily PM Peak Hour (10 to 11 a.m.) Midday Peak Hour 354564130 InOutInOutInOut 14226111714402262215122718536211429224950818 AM Peak Hour Development North of Main StreetDevelopment South of Main Street Trips2152131451572392425662Trips123851661312722694978 Size 72 units41079108234 40 units 3,500 SF18151081913376 5,000 SF4,000 SF6464555573742120 100 units 20,000 SF3423605189901878 70,000 SF93444912035,000 SF50336750115116190615,000 SF 150,000 SF20688819256400,000 SF521621202052684 125 Homes2365253374441180 Total 2025 Development Total 2040 Development Type (ITE Code) Retail (822) Warehouse / Distribution (150)Warehouse / Distribution (150) Warehouse / Distribution (150)Senior Living (252)Gas Station / Convenience (945)General Retail (822)Grocery Store (850) FWatermark DevelopmentResidential - Remaining (210) CSpec Industrial (East)1Spec Commercial (Southeast)Restaurant (932)2Spec Commercial (Northeast)General 3General Retail4Future Grocery ASutton TransportBSpec Industrial (South) DChestnut Senior AppartmentsSenior Living (252)GSenior LivingHKwik Trip E-1Spec Commercial (Northeast)Hotel (312)E-2Spec Commercial (Northeast)Restaurant (932) ADJACENT DEVELOPMENT TRIP GENERATION Zone/IDName 2025 Developments2040 Developments 312 Business Hotel 251 Senior Adult - Multifamily 210 Single-Family Detached Housing , 11th Edition 150 Warehousing TotalInOutTotalInOutTotalInOutTotalInOut ƩźƦ DĻƓĻƩğƷźƚƓ ağƓǒğƌ 1:00 PM6.2%6.7%5.6%6.1%6.1%6.0%7.3%7.3%7.3%3.5%3.4%3.6%2:00 PM7.1%7.9%6.2%6.6%7.1%6.1%7.4%7.8%7.0%4.5%5.0%3.9%3:00 PM9.0%6.4%11.4%7.5%8.7%6.2%7.9%9.0%6.8%5.2%5.5%4.8%4:00 PM7.4%5.0%9.7%8.9%10.5%7.4%7 .8%9.4%6.2%5.7%6.1%5.2%5:00 PM6.8%4.7%8.8%8.7%10.0%7.3%7.8%9.4%6.1%6.9%7.5%6.3%6:00 PM3.8%1.9%5.6%7.2%8.5%5.9%6.3%7.2%5.3%7.0%7.3%6.6%7:00 PM1.3%1.0%1.5%5.1%6.1%4.2%3.9%5.1%2.7%7.8%9.3%6.2%8:00 PM0.8%0.8%0.9%4.6%6.1%3.1%2.9%4.4%1.5%6.5%7.8%5.1%9:00 PM2.3%0.7%3.8%3.3%4.4%2.3%2.1%3.1%1.2%5.6%7.3%3.8% 1:00 AM0.5%0.2%0.8%0.2%0.2%0.1%0.1%0.2%0.1%0.9%0.9%0.9%2:00 AM0.3%0.2%0.4%0.2%0.3%0.1%0.1%0.1%0.1%0.5%0.6%0.5%3:00 AM0.5%0.5%0.5%0.2%0.2%0.2%0.1%0.1%0.1%0.6%0.4%0.7%4:00 AM1.2%1.2%1.2%0.6%0.3%0.8%0.2 %0.1%0.4%1.2%1.1%1.4%5:00 AM3.0%3.9%2.2%1.2%0.5%2.0%0.7%0.2%1.2%2.1%1.6%2.5%6:00 AM5.9%9.0%2.8%3.7%1.6%5.8%2.3%1.0%3.7%3.8%2.9%4.8%7:00 AM6.5%8.6%4.6%6.5%3.1%10.0%5.4%2.8%8.0%7.1%4.8%9.4%8:00 AM6.2%7.6%4.9%6.2%3.8%8.5%6.4%3.9%8.8%5.5%3.6%7.6%9:00 AM7.2%8.8%5.7%4.6%3.3%5.8%6.8%5.2%8.4%4.7%3.1%6.3% Time 12:00 PM8.7%9.6%7.8%5.7%5.7%5.7%7.9%7.8%7.9%3.9%3.9%3.9%10:00 PM0.9%1.3%0.5%1.6%2.1%1.0%1.3%1.8%0.8%4.7%6.2%3.1%11:00 PM0.9%0.6%1.2%1.0%1.3%0.6%0.6%0.8%0.3%3.1%3.5%2.7% 12:00 AM0.3%0.2%0.4%0.3%0.5%0.2%0.2%0.3%0.1%1.5%1.7%1.2%10:00 AM6.0%6.0%6.0%4.9%4.2%5.6%7.1%6.1%8.1%4.1%2.8%5.4%11:00 AM7.3%7.2%7.4%5.3%5.4%5.1%7.5%7.1%7.9%3.7%3.4%3.9% Hourly Distribution of Entering and Exiting Vehicle Trips by Land Use Source: ITE Time 945 Convenience Store/Gas Station 932 gh-Turnover (Sit-Down) Restaura i 850 Supermarket 820 Shopping Center 0.1%0.0%0.1%0.1%0.0%0.2%0.5%0.3%0.8%0.9%0.9%0.9%12:00 AM0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.2%0.1%0.3%0.5%0.5%0.5%1:00 AM0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.3%0.3%0.2%0.5%0.4%0.5%2:00 AM0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.3%0.2%0 .4%0.5%0.5%0.6%3:00 AM0.1%0.1%0.0%0.2%0.2%0.1%0.3%0.2%0.3%1.0%1.0%1.1%4:00 AM0.1%0.1%0.1%0.3%0.5%0.1%0.5%0.7%0.2%2.3%2.3%2.2%5:00 AM0.7%0.9%0.5%0.3%0.6%0.0%1.3%1.7%0.9%4.6%4.7%4.5%6:00 AM1.6%1.9%1.2%1.5%1.5%1.4%2.3%2.7%1.8%6.2%6.2%6.1%7:00 AM2.4%2.9%1.8%3.8%4.3%3.3%3.2%3.4%3.1%5.9%5.8%5.9%8:00 AM4.0%4.9%3.2%4.7%5.1%4.4%3.7%4.0%3.4%5.0%5.0%5.1%9:00 AM6.1%7.0%5.3%5.9%6.4%5.4%4.9%5.5 %4.4%5.2%5.2%5.2%10:00 AM7.9%8.5%7.3%7.4%7.4%7.3%9.5%12.1%6.9%5.3%5.3%5.2%11:00 AM9.2%9.6%8.9%9.6%9.3%9.9%12.3%12.4%12.3%5.8%5.8%5.8%12:00 PM8.8%8.7%9.0%8.1%8.7%7.5%8.8%6.5%11.2%5.4%5.4%5.3%1:00 PM8.2%7.8%8.6%9.0%8.8%9.2%4.5%4.0%5.1%5.9%6.1%5.8%2:00 PM8.3%8.1%8.5%8.7%8.9%8.5%3.6%3.3%4.0%6.5%6.5%6.4%3:00 PM8.7%8.6%8.7%9.7%9.8%9.7%5.1%6.2%3.9%7.1%7.2%7.1%4:00 PM8.8%8.7%8.9%9.5%9.5%9.5%8.5%10. 2%6.8%6.9%7.0%6.9%5:00 PM7.7%7.7%7.8%8.5%7.8%9.3%9.4%10.1%8.7%6.5%6.5%6.6%6:00 PM6.8%6.5%7.0%6.1%5.6%6.6%8.2%7.2%9.2%5.3%5.3%5.3%7:00 PM5.3%4.3%6.3%4.0%3.8%4.2%5.7%4.3%7.1%4.4%4.3%4.5%8:00 PM3.3%1.9%4.6%2.3%1.9%2.8%3.7%2.6%4.8%3.7%3.7%3.7%9:00 PM1.0%0.8%1.2%0.2%0.0%0.4%2.2%1.4%2.9%2.8%2.7%2.8%10:00 PM0.5%0.3%0.7%0.1%0.0%0.2%0.9%0.5%1.4%1.9%1.8%1.9%11:00 PM TotalInOutTotalInOutTotalInOutTotalInOut ENTER SITE CODE in ENTER LOCATION - 2W4F SS AutosTrucksVansTotal Time InOutTotalInOutTotalInOutTotalInOutTotal Total 6036031,2062121423443446889689681936 01:00 10201022130001041105 02:00 000112000112 03:00 000112000112 04:00 000123000123 05:00 3303311200034135 06:00 000213000213 07:00 000011000011 07:30 000000000000 08:00 000000000000 08:30 000101000101 09:00 12001201120001211122 10:00 20602060110216216206217423 11:00 23023112012812824129153 12:00 01021020000000102102 13:00 5905900000059059 14:00 0333300000003333 15:00 000000000000 16:00 6006000000060060 16:30 0303010100013031 17:00 0303001100003131 17:30 000000000000 18:00 0262611200012728 19:00 05454213108010811055165 20:00 01941941121900190191195386 21:00 09696123460464798145 22:00 0383821300023941 23:00 000112000112 Total 6036031,2062121423443446889689681936 Typical Weekday Conditions 1st Shift:2:00 AM12:30 PM 102 Assoc. 2nd Shift:6:00 AM2:30 PMAssoc. 33 3rd Shift:1:30 PM10:00 PMAssoc. 33 PFSD Shift:2:00 PM6:00 PM 26 Assoc. RTS Shift:12:00 PM10:30 PMAssoc. 5 Drivers:9:20 AM9:00 PM 344 Drivers ENTER SITE CODE in ENTER LOCATION - 2W4F SS AutosTrucksVansTotal Time InOutTotalInOutTotalInOutTotalInOutTotal 0:00 000224000224 01:00 186182368224000188184372 02:00 000112000112 03:00 000224000224 04:00 000224000224 05:00 2602611200027128 06:00 96096224000982100 07:00 50050112072725173124 07:30 1010110727217374 08:00 000000033033 08:30 000101000101 09:00 12001202240001222124 10:00 18801880110216216188217405 11:00 17017112010310318104122 12:00 01861860000000186186 13:00 5205200000052052 14:00 0262600000002626 15:00 000000000000 16:00 6006010100061061 16:30 0303021318018203151 17:00 182842661233603621986305 17:30 03737112740747538113 18:00 082828210190192784111 19:00 0545471219108010811566181 20:00 01881884481780178182192374 21:00 07777347330333681117 22:00 0323222400023436 23:00 000224000224 Total 9789781956484896466466932149214922984 Seasonal Peak Conditions C0 Shift: 5:30 PM6:30 PM 182 Assoc. 2nd Shift: 2:00 AM12:30 PMAssoc. 186 2nd Shift: 6:00 AM2:30 PMAssoc. 26 3rd Shift: 1:30 PM10:00 PM 26 Assoc. PFSD Shift: 2:00 PM6:00 PMAssoc. 26 RTS Shift: 12:00 PM10:30 PM 6 Drivers Project BanjoNoise Evaluation Centerville, AnokaCounty, Minnesota Analysis Findings The site hascommercialland uses to the north, south, and west as well as residential land uses to the west. The closest residential land use is approximately 600 feet southof the truck court on the western façade of the Project Banjo building. Applicable noise limits from the Centerville Code of Ordinances vary based on the duration of the sound and the district in which the sound is received. Unmitigated hourly equivalent operational noise levels were estimated to range from approximately 44dB(A) to 48 dB(A) during the peak daytime and nighttime hours at the closest noise-sensitive uses westof the site. Noise abatementwas analyzed to be conservative butis not recommendedfor inclusion in the project design at this time. Project BanjoNoise Memo May 17, 2022-Page2 Project BanjoNoise Memo May 17, 2022-Page3 Project BanjoNoise Memo May 17, 2022-Page4 Project BanjoNoise Memo May 17, 2022-Page5 Residential/Mixed Use Commercial/Industrial Project BanjoNoise Memo May 17, 2022-Page6 Rooftop HVAC Units Passenger Vehicles/Vans Project BanjoNoise Memo May 17, 2022-Page7 Delivery Trucks Project BanjoNoise Memo May 17, 2022-Page8 Project BanjoNoise Memo May 17, 2022-Page9 Characteristics of Noise 9ƭƷźƒğƷĻ ƚŅ ğƌǒĻ ğƓķ ğǣĻƭ 3/8/2022 PROPOSED DISTRIBUTION WAREHOUSE PARCEL ID#s 24-31-22-32-0002 &24-31-22-32-0003 Style of Building: 1 level Distribution Warehouse withAttached Canopy Quality of Building: Good EstimatedLand Use: 39.41AC (1,716,700SF) Estimated LandValue: $5,097,300 Estimated Improvement Value: $14,664,000 EstimatedTotal Value(Using 2022 rates): $19,761,300 Classification Rate: (Commercial) 1.5%-$1-$150,000, 2.00% above$150,000 EstimatedTotalTaxes(Using proposed2022 tax rates): $681,118.41 www RevieRevieRevie landland e e etc. y thethe Cit ofof to streets, DeterminationDeterminationDeterminationDetermination priceprice const. deposit infrastructur infrastructur SACSACSACSAC Council thethe during adjacent Met escrow sewerwater withwith for rr CouncilCouncilCouncilCouncil site citycity from review to Engineer/Planner/AttorneyEngineer/Planner/AttorneyEngineer/Planner/Attorney MetMetMetMet includedincluded deposit forforfor majormajor due contractocontracto charge withwithwithwith areare forfor engineer perper EscrowsEscrowsEscrowsVerifyVerifyVerifyVerifyDirectPaysPaysCostsCosts2"2"Waived $0.00 $5,000.00 DepositNotesDeposit $20,000.00 $10,000.00For $20,000.00Damage Escrow $0.00$0.00$0.00 $250.00$500.00$100.00$850.00$25,000.00$940.00$360.00 $1,670.00 $2,970.00$30,000.00 $93,519.72$500.00$14,750.00$61,250.00$90,262.50 $62,125.00$57,500.00$46,250.00$90,262.50 $143,876.49$573,353.71$55,500.00 $252,146.21$500.00$227,125.00 FeesEscrowFees 25 0.574.850.94 18.8525.20 $7,361.49 $136,515.00 $29,500,000.00 Valuationrr Cost TotalSiteSiteREUREUsREUsREUs 11 1Site1mete1mete1Site 252525 PermitValuation 41.50Acres 300.00$450,000.00300.00$2,400,000.00300.00$450,000.00200.00$26,200,000.00 BuildingBuilding Valuation/SFofof 65% rr 0.05% Imperv.875,000 SiteSiteSiteREUREUREUREUN/AREUN/ASFacremetemetesite $1,000 EAPerSF/REU 1,500SF8,000SF1,500SF$4.791,5002,6508,0001,6501,5001,600$0.00 $0.07per $1,850per$8,100per$8,000per$2,175per $2,485per$2,300per 131,000SF 142,000SF 131,0006,950$940.00per$360.00per $250.00per$250.00per$250.00per $7,361.49$1,670.00per 2/17/2022 $143,876.49 $29,500,000.00 SF s t Fee foo Calculation: s Review Million (REU) r r $.07/sq. s $1 Plan @ s EscrowUnit SeweWate Summary w Fee over and Fee Escrow Calculation: ands Fee Calculation: Charge rEscro Fee Permit and Fee Value Fee Fee Site $1Million Fees ChargeCharge t Escrows Permit e in Review Area Permit ToFees Charges Mete Banjo Pla Equivalency Fees Dedication and REUs Valuation and Up Review Building Permit RoomRoom Way r Control $1,000BenefitBenefit Fees Water Planning Surcharg BuildingUtilityPark of Misc. REUs PlatFee Fees Dedication Dedication Review (MCES)(City) PlanEscrow per MeteIrrigation CentervilleProject ItemProperty OfficeCafeteriaWorkoutWarehouse/Industrial TotalPlanning SitePreliminaryFinal TotalBuilding BaseFeeSubtotalPlanState TotalResidential OfficeCafeteriaWorkoutWarehouseTotal RoundedUtility SACSACWACLateralLateralStorm TotalPark Park TotalMisc 2"2"ErosionRightProfessionalSite TotalTotals Community Map; see next pagefor details. City ofCenterville For 2023, the estimated wastewater service fee for your community is $271,022.70, a change of 5.83% from 2022. The table below details your wastewater flow, inmillions of gallons (mg), and allocated costof service: Community Allocation2023 20222021 Metered flow (mg)87.0794.5095.30 Unmetered flow (mg)-2.66-3.22-3.81 Total flow (mg)84.4191.2891.49 Percent of regional flow0.10%0.10%0.09% Municipal wastewater charge$271,023$256,084$226,767 Cost change from prior 5.83%12.93%-4.73% Your fee is based on the portion of wastewater flow discharged from your community to the regional system in the past year(2021) multiplied by themultiplied by themultiplied by the regionalwastewater chargefor the next year (2023). Year-to-year changes changes changes are affected by growth, water conservation, and inflow and infiltrationare affected by growth, water conservation, and inflow and infiltrationare affected by growth, water conservation, and inflow and infiltration. . . Region2023 2022202020222111 Regional allocated flow (mg)82,130.2889,095.42969696,,,967.05967.05967.05 Flow change from prior-7.82%-8.12%101010...3333%3%3% Regional wastewater charge$263,703,000$249,955955955,,,000000000$2$2$240,34240,34240,342,,,000000000 Cost change from prior5.5%4...000%%%222...000%%% Some wastewatermay enter or leaveyour community your community your community but not but not but not be be be included in the metered flow totalincluded in the metered flow totalincluded in the metered flow total. These unmetered flows are shown below. Assigned wastewater volumes per unitAssigned wastewater volumes per unitAssigned wastewater volumes per unit, , , such as singlesuch as singlesuch as single-family unit (SFU) or residential equivalent connection (REC), vary based on past flow response to wet weather, age of services, and other vary based on past flow response to wet weather, age of services, and other vary based on past flow response to wet weather, age of services, and other available data. Flow from Centerville = 0.00mg;added toadded toadded toallocated flowallocated flowallocated flow::: stndrdth To:Calculation/ DescriptionCalculation/ DescriptionCalculation/ Description1Q2Q3Q4QNotes Flow to Centerville = - 2.66mgmgmg;;;deducted from deducted from deducted from allocated flowallocated flowallocated flow: stndrdth From:Calculation/ DescriptionCalculation/ DescriptionCalculation/ Description1Q2Q3Q4QNotes Lino Lakes38 + 0 SFU x 70,00038 + 0 SFU x 70,00038 + 0 SFU x 70,000-0.66-0.66-0.67-0.67 Unmetered flow totalUnmetered flow totalUnmetered flow total = - = - = - 2.662.662.66mgmgmg May 10, 2022 City ofCenterville May 10, 2022